form10q.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[
X ]
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
or
[ ]
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission
file number: 000-23192
CELADON
GROUP, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
13-3361050
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(IRS
Employer
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
|
9503
East 33rd
Street
|
|
One
Celadon Drive
|
|
Indianapolis,
IN
|
46235-4207
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
|
(317)
972-7000
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
"accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated
filer [X]
|
Non-accelerated
filer [ ]
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12-b2 of the Exchange Act).
As of
October 30, 2008 (the latest practicable date), 22,092,994 shares of the
registrant's common stock, par value $0.033 per share, were
outstanding.
CELADON
GROUP, INC.
Index
to
September
30, 2008 Form 10-Q
Part
I.
|
Financial
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2008 (Unaudited) and June 30,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and
Procedures
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part
II.
|
Other
Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items
2-5.
|
|
Not
Applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part
I. Financial
Information
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September
30, 2008 and June 30, 2008
(Dollars
in thousands except per share and par value amounts)
|
|
September
30,
2008
|
|
|
June
30,
2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
2,325 |
|
Trade receivables, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,296 and $1,194 at September 30, 2008
and June 30, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
64,131 |
|
|
|
69,513 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets
|
|
|
16,796 |
|
|
|
16,697 |
|
Tires in
service
|
|
|
4,207 |
|
|
|
3,765 |
|
Income tax
receivable
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
5,846 |
|
Deferred income
taxes
|
|
|
4,068 |
|
|
|
3,035 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
90,193 |
|
|
|
101,181 |
|
Property
and equipment
|
|
|
267,896 |
|
|
|
270,832 |
|
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
70,556 |
|
|
|
64,633 |
|
Net
property and equipment
|
|
|
197,340 |
|
|
|
206,199 |
|
Tires
in service
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
1,483 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
19,137 |
|
|
|
19,137 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
309,544 |
|
|
$ |
329,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
9,165 |
|
|
$ |
6,910 |
|
Accrued salaries and
benefits
|
|
|
11,478 |
|
|
|
11,358 |
|
Accrued insurance and
claims
|
|
|
10,089 |
|
|
|
9,086 |
|
Accrued fuel
expense
|
|
|
10,083 |
|
|
|
12,170 |
|
Other accrued
expenses
|
|
|
10,792 |
|
|
|
11,916 |
|
Current maturities of
long-term debt
|
|
|
7,346 |
|
|
|
8,290 |
|
Current maturities of capital
lease obligations
|
|
|
6,505 |
|
|
|
6,454 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
65,458 |
|
|
|
66,184 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current
maturities
|
|
|
26,924 |
|
|
|
45,645 |
|
Capital lease obligations, net
of current maturities
|
|
|
40,420 |
|
|
|
42,117 |
|
Deferred income
taxes
|
|
|
30,664 |
|
|
|
31,512 |
|
Minority
interest
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.033 par
value, authorized 40,000,000 shares; issued 23,925,380 and 23,704,046
shares at September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2008,
respectively
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
Treasury stock at cost;
1,832,386 shares at September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2008
|
|
|
(12,633 |
) |
|
|
(12,633 |
) |
Additional paid-in
capital
|
|
|
95,790 |
|
|
|
95,173 |
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
63,650 |
|
|
|
60,881 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(1,544 |
) |
|
|
(351 |
) |
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
146,053 |
|
|
|
143,852 |
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$ |
309,544 |
|
|
$ |
329,335 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For
the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight revenue
|
|
$ |
109,289 |
|
|
$ |
113,854 |
|
Fuel surcharges
|
|
|
37,579 |
|
|
|
19,925 |
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
146,868 |
|
|
|
133,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, wages, and employee
benefits
|
|
|
41,329 |
|
|
|
38,327 |
|
Fuel
|
|
|
48,066 |
|
|
|
33,522 |
|
Operations and
maintenance
|
|
|
9,387 |
|
|
|
8,436 |
|
Insurance and
claims
|
|
|
3,619 |
|
|
|
3,541 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
8,032 |
|
|
|
7,865 |
|
Revenue equipment
rentals
|
|
|
6,063 |
|
|
|
6,972 |
|
Purchased
transportation
|
|
|
15,761 |
|
|
|
21,970 |
|
Cost of products and services
sold
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
Communications and
utilities
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
Operating taxes and
licenses
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
2,161 |
|
General and other
operating
|
|
|
2,489 |
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
139,917 |
|
|
|
127,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
6,951 |
|
|
|
5,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
(income) expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
1,314 |
|
Other (income) expense,
net
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Income
before income taxes
|
|
|
5,854 |
|
|
|
4,612 |
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
3,085 |
|
|
|
2,111 |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
2,769 |
|
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per
share
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Basic earnings per
share
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Average
shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
22,031 |
|
|
|
23,753 |
|
Basic
|
|
|
21,581 |
|
|
|
23,465 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For
the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
(Dollars
in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
2,769 |
|
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
9,065 |
|
|
|
7,705 |
|
(Gain)\Loss on sale of
equipment
|
|
|
(1,033 |
) |
|
|
160 |
|
Stock based
compensation
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
Deferred income
taxes
|
|
|
(1,881 |
) |
|
|
1,545 |
|
Provision for doubtful
accounts
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Changes in assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
|
|
5,338 |
|
|
|
(1,793 |
) |
Income tax
receivable
|
|
|
5,018 |
|
|
|
926 |
|
Tires in
service
|
|
|
(540 |
) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other
current
assets
|
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(4,240 |
) |
Other
assets
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
3,922 |
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
19,303 |
|
|
|
10,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and
equipment
|
|
|
(10,563 |
) |
|
|
(3,193 |
) |
Proceeds on sale of property and
equipment
|
|
|
10,409 |
|
|
|
7,815 |
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by
investing
activities
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
4,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuances of common
stock
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
883 |
|
Payments on long-term
debt
|
|
|
(19,666 |
) |
|
|
(15,635 |
) |
Principal payments under capital
lease
obligations
|
|
|
(1,645 |
) |
|
|
(1,604 |
) |
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(21,311 |
) |
|
|
(16,356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease
in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(2,162 |
) |
|
|
(1,149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of
period
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of
period
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
|
$ |
1,189 |
|
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
Income taxes
paid
|
|
$ |
--- |
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2008
(Unaudited)
1. Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Celadon
Group, Inc. and its majority owned subsidiaries (the "Company"). All
material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") in the United
States of America pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") for interim financial statements. Certain
information and footnote disclosures have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the accompanying
unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments (all of a normal
recurring nature), which are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial
condition and results of operations for these periods. The results of
operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results
for a full year. These condensed consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.
The
preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
2. New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements ("SFAS 157"). SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements required under other accounting pronouncements, but does
not change existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at
fair value. It also establishes a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes information used in developing assumptions when pricing an asset or
liability. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position
No. 157-2, which provides a one-year delayed application of SFAS 157 for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at
least annually). The Company must adopt these new requirements no
later than its first quarter of fiscal 2010. We are currently
assessing the potential impact that adoption of SFAS 157 will have on our
financial statements.
In
December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 141R (revised 2007),
Business Combinations ("SFAS 141R"), which replaces SFAS No. 141.
The statement retains the purchase method of accounting for acquisitions,
but requires a number of changes, including changes in the way assets and
liabilities are recognized in the purchase accounting. It also changes the
recognition of assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from
contingencies, requires the capitalization of in-process research and
development at fair value, and requires the expensing of acquisition-related
costs as incurred. The impact to the Company from the adoption of
SFAS 141R will depend on the acquisitions at the time. SFAS 141R is
effective for us beginning July 1, 2009 and will apply prospectively to
business combinations completed on or after that date.
In
December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements—an amendment of ARB 51 ("SFAS 160"), which changes the
accounting and reporting for minority interests. Minority interests
will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and will be reported as a
component of equity separate from the parent's equity, and purchases or sales of
equity interests that do not result in a change in control will be accounted for
as equity transactions. In addition, net income attributable to the
noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face
of the income statement and, upon a loss of control, the interest sold, as well
as any interest retained, will be recorded at fair value with any gain or loss
recognized in earnings. SFAS 160 is effective for us beginning July
1, 2009 and will apply prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure
requirements, which will apply retrospectively. We are currently
assessing the potential impact that adoption of SFAS 160 will have on our
financial statements.
CELADON
GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2008
(Unaudited)
In March
2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133 ("SFAS 161"). SFAS 161 requires
enhanced disclosures about an entity's derivative and hedging activities,
including (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments,
(ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for
under SFAS No. 133, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged
items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash
flows. This statement is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. Accordingly, the
Company will adopt SFAS 161 in fiscal year 2010.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("SFAS
162"). This standard reorganizes the GAAP Hierarchy in order to
improve financial reporting by providing a consistent framework for determining
what accounting principles should be used when preparing U.S. GAAP financial
statements. SFAS 162 shall be effective 60 days after the SEC's
approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's amendments to
Interim Auditing Standard, AU Section 411, The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. This new standard should have no impact on our balance sheet,
statement of operations, or cash flows.
3. Income
Taxes
Income
tax expense varies from the federal corporate income tax rate of 35%, primarily
due to state income taxes, net of federal income tax effect and our permanent
differences primarily related to per diem pay structure.
Effective
July 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
("FIN 48"). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of
a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. As of
September 30, 2008, the Company recorded a $0.7 million liability for
unrecognized tax benefits, a portion of which represents penalties and
interest.
As of September 30, 2008, we are subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations
for the tax years 2005 through 2007. We file tax returns in numerous
state jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations.
4. Earnings
Per Share
The difference in basic
and diluted weighted average shares is due to the assumed exercise of
outstanding stock options. A reconciliation of the basic and diluted
earnings per share calculation was as follows (amounts in thousands, except per
share amounts):
CELADON
GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
For
three months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
2,769 |
|
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
21,581 |
|
|
|
23,465 |
|
Equivalent
shares issuable upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
shares
|
|
|
22,031 |
|
|
|
23,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
5. Segment
Information and Significant Customers
The
Company operates in two segments, transportation and e-commerce. The
Company generates revenue in the transportation segment primarily by providing
truckload-hauling services through its subsidiaries, Celadon Trucking Services,
Inc. ("CTSI"), Celadon Logistics Services, Inc. ("CLSI"), Servicios de
Transportacion Jaguar, S.A. de C.V., ("Jaguar"), and Celadon Canada, Inc.
("CelCan"). The Company provides certain services over the Internet
through its e-commerce subsidiary TruckersB2B, Inc.
("TruckersB2B"). TruckersB2B is an Internet based
"business-to-business" membership program, owned by Celadon E-Commerce, Inc., a
wholly owned subsidiary of Celadon Group, Inc. The e-commerce segment
generates revenue by providing discounted fuel, tires, and other products and
services to small and medium-sized trucking companies. The Company
evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on operating income
(amounts below in thousands).
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
E-commerce
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Three
months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
revenue
|
|
$ |
144,612 |
|
|
$ |
2,256 |
|
|
$ |
146,868 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
6,622 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
6,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
revenue
|
|
$ |
131,294 |
|
|
$ |
2,485 |
|
|
$ |
133,779 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
5,566 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
5,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information as to the Company's
operating revenue by geographic area is summarized below (in
thousands). The Company allocates operating revenue based on country
of origin of the tractor hauling the freight:
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Three
months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
revenue
|
|
$ |
128,199 |
|
|
$ |
11,236 |
|
|
$ |
7,433 |
|
|
$ |
146,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
revenue
|
|
$ |
110,905 |
|
|
$ |
14,336 |
|
|
$ |
8,538 |
|
|
$ |
133,779 |
|
No customer accounted for more than 5%
of the Company's total revenue during any of its two most recent fiscal years or
the interim periods presented above.
CELADON
GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2008
(Unaudited)
6. Stock
Based Compensation
On July 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R), which requires that all
share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options,
be recognized in the financial statements based upon a grant-date fair value of
an award. In January 2006, stockholders approved the Company's 2006
Omnibus Incentive Plan ("2006 Plan"), which provides various vehicles to
compensate the Company's key employees. The 2006 Plan utilizes such
vehicles as stock options, restricted stock grants, and stock appreciation
rights ("SARs"). The 2006 Plan authorized the Company to grant
1,687,500 shares (adjusted for the 3-for-2 stock splits declared by the
Company's Board of Directors effective February 15, 2006 and June 15,
2006). In fiscal 2009, the Company granted 3,500 stock options and
222,084 shares of restricted stock pursuant to the 2006 Plan. The
Company is authorized to grant an additional 20,079 shares pursuant to the 2006
Plan.
The
following table summarizes the expense components of our stock based
compensation program:
|
|
For
three months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
options expense
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
Restricted
stock expense
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
Stock
appreciation rights expense
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
(577 |
) |
Total stock related
compensation expense
|
|
$ |
885 |
|
|
$ |
(283 |
) |
The Company has granted a number of
stock options under various plans. Options granted to employees have
been granted with an exercise price equal to the market price on the grant date
and expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant date. The majority
of options granted to employees vest 25 percent per year, commencing with the
first anniversary of the grant date. Options granted to non-employee
directors have been granted with an exercise price equal to the market price on
the grant date, vest over one to four years, commencing with the first
anniversary of the grant date, and expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant
date.
A summary
of the activity of the Company's stock option plans as of September 30, 2008 and
changes during the period then ended is presented below:
Options
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining Contractual Term
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at July 1, 2008
|
|
|
1,319,898 |
|
|
$ |
9.90 |
|
|
|
7.98 |
|
|
$ |
1,742,049 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
$ |
13.34 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
$ |
14.73 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Outstanding
at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,318,398 |
|
|
$ |
9.89 |
|
|
|
7.73 |
|
|
$ |
2,867,070 |
|
Exercisable
at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
413,687 |
|
|
$ |
9.67 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
|
|
$ |
1,131,118 |
|
CELADON GROUP,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2008
(Unaudited)
The fair
value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions:
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average grant date fair value
|
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
|
$ |
9.78 |
|
Dividend
yield
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
|
45.5 |
% |
|
|
48.8 |
% |
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
2.32 |
% |
|
|
4.71 |
% |
Expected
lives
|
|
4
years
|
|
|
4
years
|
|
Restricted
Shares
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested
at July 1, 2008
|
|
|
156,200 |
|
|
$ |
12.22 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
222,084 |
|
|
$ |
11.89 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(3,150 |
) |
|
$ |
15.65 |
|
Unvested
at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
375,134 |
|
|
$ |
12.00 |
|
Restricted
shares granted to employees have been granted with a fair value equal to the
market price on the grant date and the grants vest by 25 percent or 33 percent
per year, commencing with the first anniversary of the grant date. In
addition, for a portion of the shares certain financial targets must be met for
these shares to vest. Restricted shares granted to non-employee directors
have been granted with a fair value equal to the market price on the grant date
and vest on the date of the Company's next annual meeting.
As of
September 30, 2008, the Company had $2.7 million and $3.8 million of total
unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock,
respectively, that is expected to be recognized over the remaining period of
approximately 3.3 years for stock options and 3.9 years for restricted
stock.
Stock
Appreciation Rights
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested
at July 1, 2008
|
|
|
167,202 |
|
|
$ |
8.68 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Paid
|
|
|
(7,426 |
) |
|
$ |
9.37 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
$ |
8.64 |
|
Unvested
at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
159,552 |
|
|
$ |
8.25 |
|
SARs
granted to employees vest on a three or four year vesting
schedule. In addition, certain financial targets must be met for the
SARs to vest. During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company
gave SARs grantees the opportunity to enter into an alternative fixed
compensation arrangement whereby the grantee would forfeit all rights to SARs
compensation in exchange for a guaranteed quarterly payment for the remainder of
the underlying SARs term. This alternative arrangement is subject to
continued service to the Company or one of its subsidiaries. These fixed
payments will be accrued quarterly until March 31, 2009. The Company
offered this alternative arrangement to mitigate the volatility to earnings from
stock price variance on the SARs. The alternative arrangement awards
are not included in the figures presented in this footnote.
CELADON
GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2008
(Unaudited)
7. Stock
Repurchase Programs
On October 24, 2007, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a stock
repurchase program pursuant to which the Company purchased 2,000,000 shares of
the Company's common stock in open market transactions at an aggregate cost of
approximately $13.8 million. On December 5, 2007, the
Company's Board of Directors authorized an additional stock repurchase program
pursuant to which the Company may purchase up to 2,000,000 additional shares of
the Company's common stock in open market transactions through December 3,
2008. As of September 30, 2008 we had not purchased any of these
additional shares. We intend to hold repurchased shares in treasury
for general corporate purposes, including issuances under stock option
plans. We account for treasury stock using the cost
method.
8. Comprehensive
Income
Comprehensive income consisted of the following components for the first quarter
of fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively (in thousands):
|
|
Three
months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
2,769 |
|
|
$ |
2,501 |
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(1,193 |
) |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
1,576 |
|
|
$ |
2,869 |
|
9. Commitments
and Contingencies
The
Company has outstanding commitments to purchase approximately $159.2 million of
revenue equipment at September 30, 2008.
Standby
letters of credit, not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements, aggregated approximately $4.5 million at September 30,
2008.
The
Company has employment and consulting agreements with various key employees
providing for minimum combined annual compensation of $700,000 in fiscal
2009.
There are
various claims, lawsuits, and pending actions against the Company and its
subsidiaries in the normal course of the operation of their businesses with
respect to cargo, auto liability, or income taxes.
On August
8, 2007, the 384th District Court of the State of Texas situated in El Paso,
Texas, rendered a judgment against CTSI, for approximately $3.4 million in the
case of Martinez v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc., which was originally filed
on September 4, 2002. The case involves a workers' compensation claim
of a former employee of CTSI who suffered a back injury as a result of a traffic
accident. CTSI and the Company believe all actions taken were proper
and legal and contend that the proper and exclusive place for resolution of this
dispute was before the Indiana Worker's Compensation Board. While
there can be no certainty as to the outcome, the Company believes that the
ultimate resolution of this dispute will not have a materially adverse effect on
its consolidated financial position or results of operations. CTSI filed an
appeal of the decision to the Texas Court of Appeals in October
2007. Trial transcripts have been prepared for the Court of Appeals
and appellate briefing is in process.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Disclosure
Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report contains
certain statements that may be considered forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and
other factors which may cause the actual results, events, performance, or
achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results,
events, performance, or achievements expressed in or implied by such
forward-looking statements. Such statements may be identified by the
fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current
facts. These statements generally use words such as "believe,"
"expect," "anticipate," "project," "forecast," "should," "estimate," "plan,"
"outlook," "goal," and similar expressions. While it is impossible to
identify all factors that may cause actual results to differ from those
expressed in or implied by forward-looking statements, the risks and
uncertainties that may affect the Company's business, include, but are not
limited to, those discussed in the section entitled Item 1A. Risk Factors set
forth below.
All such forward-looking statements
speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. You are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The Company
expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any
updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to
reflect any change in the Company's expectations with regard thereto or any
change in the events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such statement
is based.
References to the "Company," "we,"
"us," "our," and words of similar import refer to Celadon Group, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
Business
Overview
We are one of North America's twenty largest truckload carriers as measured by
revenue. We generated $565.9 million in operating revenue during
our fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. We have grown significantly
since our incorporation in 1986 through internal growth and a series of
acquisitions since 1995. As a dry van truckload carrier, we generally
transport full trailer loads of freight from origin to destination without
intermediate stops or handling. Our customer base includes many
Fortune 500 shippers.
In
our international operations, we offer time-sensitive transportation in and
between the United States and two of its largest trading partners, Mexico and
Canada. We generated approximately one-half of our revenue in fiscal
2008 from international movements, and we believe our annual border crossings
make us the largest provider of international truckload movements in North
America. We believe that our strategically located terminals and
experience with the language, culture, and border crossing requirements of each
North American country provide a competitive advantage in the international
trucking marketplace.
We believe our international operations, particularly those involving Mexico,
offer an attractive business niche for several reasons. The
additional complexity of and need to establish cross-border business partners
and to develop strong organization and adequate infrastructure in Mexico affords
some barriers to competition that are not present in traditional U.S. truckload
services. In addition, the expected continued growth of Mexico's
economy, particularly exports to the U.S., positions us to capitalize on our
cross-border expertise.
Our success is dependent upon the success of our operations in Mexico and
Canada, and we are subject to risks of doing business internationally, including
fluctuations in foreign currencies, changes in the economic strength of the
countries in which we do business, difficulties in enforcing contractual
obligations and intellectual property rights, burdens of complying with a wide
variety of international and United States export and import laws, and social,
political, and economic instability. Additional risks associated with
our foreign operations, including restrictive trade policies and imposition of
duties, taxes, or government royalties by foreign governments, are present but
largely mitigated by the terms of NAFTA.
In addition to our international business, we offer a broad range of truckload
transportation services within the United States, including long-haul, regional,
dedicated, and logistics. With five different asset-based
acquisitions from 2003 to 2007, we expanded our operations and service offerings
within the United States and significantly improved our lane density, freight
mix, and customer diversity.
We also operate TruckersB2B, a profitable marketing business that affords volume
purchasing power for items such as fuel, tires, and equipment to approximately
21,200 trucking fleets representing approximately 482,000 tractors. TruckersB2B
represents a separate operating segment under generally accepted accounting
principles.
Recent
Results and Financial Condition
For the
first quarter of fiscal 2009, total revenue increased 9.8% to $146.9 million,
compared with $133.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal
2008. Freight revenue, which excludes revenue from fuel surcharges,
decreased 4.0% to $109.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2009, compared
with $113.9 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Net income
increased 12.0% to $2.8 million from $2.5 million, and diluted earnings per
share increased to $0.13 from $0.11.
At
September 30, 2008, our total balance sheet debt (including capital lease
obligations less cash) was $81.0 million, and our total stockholders' equity was
$146.1 million, for a total debt to capitalization ratio of 35.7%. At
September 30, 2008, we had $39.8 million of available borrowing capacity under
our revolving credit facility.
Revenue
We
generate substantially all of our revenue by transporting freight for our
customers. Generally, we are paid by the mile or by the load for our
services. We also derive revenue from fuel surcharges, loading and
unloading activities, equipment detention, other trucking related services, and
from TruckersB2B. We believe that eliminating the impact of the
sometimes volatile fuel surcharge revenue affords a more consistent basis for
comparing our results of operations from period to period. The main
factors that affect our revenue are the revenue per mile we receive from our
customers, the percentage of miles for which we are compensated, the number of
tractors operating, and the number of miles we generate with our
equipment. These factors relate to, among other things, the U.S. economy,
inventory levels, the level of truck capacity in our markets, specific customer
demand, the percentage of team-driven tractors in our fleet, driver
availability, and our average length of haul.
Expenses
and Profitability
The main
factors that impact our profitability on the expense side are the variable costs
of transporting freight for our customers. These costs include fuel
expense, driver-related expenses, such as wages, benefits, training, and
recruitment, and independent contractor costs, which we record as purchased
transportation. Expenses that have both fixed and variable components
include maintenance and tire expense and our total cost of insurance and
claims. These expenses generally vary with the miles we travel, but also
have a controllable component based on safety, fleet age, efficiency, and other
factors. Our main fixed cost is the acquisition and financing of long-term
assets, primarily revenue equipment. Other mostly fixed costs include our
non-driver personnel and facilities expenses. In discussing our expenses
as a percentage of revenue, we sometimes discuss changes as a percentage of
revenue before fuel surcharges, in addition to absolute dollar changes, because
we believe the high variable cost nature of our business makes a comparison of
changes in expenses as a percentage of revenue more meaningful at times than
absolute dollar changes.
The
trucking industry has experienced significant increases in expenses over the
past three years, in particular those relating to equipment costs, driver
compensation, insurance, and fuel. Until recently, many trucking companies
had been able to raise freight rates to cover the increased costs based
primarily on an industry-wide tight capacity of drivers. As freight demand
has softened, carriers have been willing to accept rate decreases to utilize
assets in service.
Revenue
Equipment and Related Financing
For the
remainder of fiscal 2009, we expect to obtain tractors and trailers primarily
for replacement, and we expect to maintain the average age of our tractor fleet
at approximately 1.8 years and the average age of our trailer fleet at
approximately 4.0 years. At September 30, 2008, we had future
operating lease obligations totaling $160.0 million, including residual value
guarantees of approximately $76.8 million.
|
|
September
30, 2008
|
|
|
September
30, 2007
|
|
|
|
Tractors
|
|
|
Trailers
|
|
|
Tractors
|
|
|
Trailers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned
equipment
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
Capital
leased equipment
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
3,726 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
3,742 |
|
Operating
leased equipment
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
2,989 |
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
Independent
contractors
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Total
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
8,894 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
8,134 |
|
Independent
contractors are utilized through a contract with us to supply one or more
tractors and drivers for our use. Independent contractors must pay their
own tractor expenses, fuel, maintenance, and driver costs and must meet our
specified guidelines with respect to safety. A lease-purchase program that
we offer provides independent contractors the opportunity to lease-to-own a
tractor from a third party. As of September 30, 2008, there were 191
independent contractors providing a combined 6.5% of our tractor
capacity.
Outlook
Looking
forward, our profitability goal is to achieve an operating ratio of
approximately 90%. We expect this to require improvements in rate per mile
and miles per tractor and decreased non-revenue miles, to overcome expected
additional cost increases. Because a large percentage of our costs are
variable, changes in revenue per mile affect our profitability to a greater
extent than changes in miles per tractor. For the remainder of fiscal
2009, the key factors that we expect to have the greatest effect on our
profitability are our freight revenue per tractor per week (which will be
affected by the general freight environment, including the balance of freight
demand and industry-wide trucking capacity), our compensation of drivers, our
cost of revenue equipment (particularly in light of the 2007 and 2010 EPA engine
requirements), our fuel costs, and our insurance and claims. To overcome
cost increases and improve our margins, we will need to achieve increases in
freight revenue per tractor. Operationally, we will seek improvements in
safety, driver recruiting, and retention. Our success in these areas
primarily will affect revenue, driver-related expenses, and insurance and claims
expense. Given the difficult freight market confronting our industry,
we believe achieving a profitability goal during fiscal 2009 is unlikely,
although we continue to strive toward that goal.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth the
percentage relationship of expense items to freight revenue for the periods
indicated:
|
|
For
the three months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight
revenue(1)
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, wages, and employee
benefits
|
|
|
37.8 |
% |
|
|
33.7 |
% |
Fuel(1)
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
Operations and
maintenance
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
Insurance and
claims
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
Revenue equipment
rentals
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
Purchased
transportation
|
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
Costs of products and services
sold
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Communications and
utilities
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Operating taxes and
licenses
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
General and other
operating
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
operating
expenses
|
|
|
93.6 |
% |
|
|
94.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before income
taxes
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Provision
for income
taxes
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
(1)
|
Freight
revenue is total revenue less fuel surcharges. In this table,
fuel surcharges are eliminated from revenue and subtracted from fuel
expense. Fuel surcharges were $37.6 million and $19.9 million
for the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
|
Comparison
of Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 to Three Months Ended September
30, 2007
Total revenue increased by $13.1 million, or 9.8%, to $146.9 million
for the first quarter of fiscal 2009, from $133.8 million for the first
quarter of fiscal 2008. Freight revenue excludes $37.6 million and
$19.9 million of fuel surcharge revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Freight revenue decreased by $4.6 million, or 4.0%, to $109.3 million for the
first quarter of fiscal 2009, from $113.9 million for the first quarter of
fiscal 2008. This decrease was primarily attributable to a difficult
freight market that resulted in a decrease of billed miles to 60.5 million for
the first quarter of fiscal 2009, from 62.6 million for the first quarter of
fiscal 2008, and a decrease in average miles per tractor per week from 1,992
miles to 1,967 miles, offset by a decrease in non-revenue miles from 10.6% to
9.8% of total miles in the first quarters of fiscal 2008 and 2009, respectively,
and a small increase in average freight revenue per loaded mile from $1.506 to
$1.511 as we closely managed freight selection. Average revenue per
tractor per week, which is our primary measure of asset productivity, remained
relatively constant at $2,680 in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, as compared
to $2,682 for the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
Revenue for TruckersB2B was $2.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal
2009, compared to $2.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal
2008. The decrease was primarily related to a decrease in fuel rebate
revenue and tire revenue, due to small
and mid size carriers being adversely affected by weak freight
demand.
Salaries, wages, and employee benefits were $41.3 million, or 37.8% of
freight revenue, for the first quarter of fiscal 2009, compared to
$38.3 million, or 33.7% of freight revenue, for the first quarter of fiscal
2008. These increases in salaries, wages, and employee benefits are
largely due to increased driver payroll related to an increase in company driver
miles, in correlation with a corresponding decrease in independent contractor
miles, and additional expenses related to equity compensation.
Fuel expenses, net of fuel surcharge revenue of $37.6 million and $19.9 million
for the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively, decreased to
$10.5 million, or 9.6% of freight revenue, for the first quarter of fiscal
2009, compared to $13.6 million, or 11.9% of freight revenue, for the first
quarter of fiscal 2008. These decreases were attributable to a
decrease in non-revenue miles, for which we do not receive fuel surcharges, and
a new company wide fuel use reduction plan. This plan involves
purchasing new, more fuel efficient equipment, adjusting the specifications to
allow for less idle time and reduced speed to obtain greater fuel efficiency,
and counseling drivers on their idle time, which has decreased
10.4%. These efforts were offset by a 44.8% increase in average fuel
prices to $4.01 per gallon in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, from $2.77 per
gallon in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, and an increase in company miles as
a percentage of all miles.
Operations and maintenance increased to $9.4 million, or 8.6% of freight
revenue, for the first quarter of fiscal 2009, from $8.4 million, or 7.4% of
freight revenue, for the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Operations and
maintenance consist of direct operating expense, maintenance, and tire
expense. These increases in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 are
primarily related to an increase in costs associated with various direct
expenses such as tolls expense, border drayage expense, and facility maintenance
and repair expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the first
quarter of fiscal 2008.
Insurance and claims expense increased to $3.6 million, or 3.3% of freight
revenue, for the first quarter of fiscal 2009, from $3.5 million, or 3.1%
of freight revenue, for the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Insurance
consists of premiums for liability, physical damage, cargo damage, and workers
compensation insurance, in addition to claims expense. These
increases resulted primarily from increases in our liability claims
expense. Our insurance program involves self-insurance at various
risk retention levels. Claims in excess of these risk levels are
covered by insurance in amounts we consider to be adequate. We accrue
for the uninsured portion of claims based on known claims and historical
experience. We continually revise and change our insurance program to
maintain a balance between premium expense and the risk retention we are willing
to assume. Insurance and claims expense will vary based primarily on
the frequency and severity of claims, the level of self-retention, and the
premium expense.
Depreciation and amortization,
consisting primarily of depreciation of revenue equipment, increased to $8.0
million, or 7.3% of freight revenue, for the first quarter of fiscal 2009,
compared to $7.9 million, or 6.9% of freight revenue, for the first quarter
of fiscal 2008. The majority of this increase is related to the net
addition of approximately 440 owned tractors, which has increased our tractor
depreciation. These increases were partially offset by gains on sales
of equipment in the quarter. Revenue equipment held under operating
leases is not reflected on our balance sheet and the expenses related to such
equipment are reflected on our statements of operations in revenue equipment
rentals, rather than in depreciation and amortization and interest expense, as
is the case for revenue equipment that is financed with borrowings or capital
leases.
Revenue equipment rentals decreased to $6.1 million, or 5.5% of freight
revenue, for the first quarter of fiscal 2009, compared to $7.0 million or 6.1%
of freight revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2008. These
decreases were attributable to a decrease in our tractor fleet financed under
operating leases as discussed under depreciation and amortization, offset by an
increase in our trailer fleet financed under operating leases. At
September 30, 2008, 1,121 tractors, or 40.7% of our company tractors, were held
under operating leases, compared to 1,405 tractors, or 54.0% of our company
tractors, at September 30, 2007. At September 30, 2008, 2,989
trailers, or 33.6%, of our trailer fleet were held under operating leases,
compared to 1,922, or 23.6% of our trailer fleet, at September 30,
2007. Given that we expect to begin to use operating leases for the
acquisition of some tractors in fiscal 2009, we expect our revenue equipment
rental to begin to increase as a percentage of freight revenue going
forward.
Purchased transportation decreased to $15.8 million, or 14.4% of freight
revenue, for the first quarter of fiscal 2009, from $22.0 million, or 19.3%
of freight revenue, for the first quarter of fiscal 2008. These
decreases are primarily related to a decrease in independent contractor expense
due to the 50.4% decrease in independent contractors and related expenses to 191
at September 30, 2008, from 385 at September 30, 2007. Independent
contractors are drivers who cover all their operating expenses (fuel, driver
salaries, maintenance, and equipment costs) for a fixed payment per
mile. The number of independent contractors has significantly
declined over the past year, as the challenging freight environment and
increased fuel costs have had a negative impact on their
profitability.
All of our other operating expenses are relatively minor in amount, and there
were no significant changes in such expenses. Accordingly, we have
not provided a detailed discussion of such expenses.
Our pretax margin, which we believe is a useful measure of our operating
performance because it is neutral with regard to the method of revenue equipment
financing that a company uses, increased 130 basis points to 5.4% of freight
revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2009, from 4.1% of freight revenue for
the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
In addition to other factors described
above, Canadian exchange rate fluctuations principally impact salaries, wages,
and employee benefits and purchased transportation and, therefore, impact our
pretax margin and results of operations.
Income taxes increased to $3.1 million, with an effective tax rate of
52.7%, for the first quarter of fiscal 2009, from $2.1 million, with an
effective tax rate of 45.8%, for the first quarter of fiscal
2008. Income tax expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2009
included an adjustment of approximately $300,000 related to per diem
calculations for prior years. As per diem is a partially
non-deductible expense, our effective tax rate will fluctuate as net income
fluctuates in the future.
As a result of the factors described
above, net income increased to $2.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal
2009, from $2.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Trucking
is a capital-intensive business. We require cash to fund our operating
expenses (other than depreciation and amortization), to make capital
expenditures and acquisitions, and to repay debt, including principal and
interest payments. Other than ordinary operating expenses, we anticipate
that capital expenditures for the acquisition of revenue equipment will
constitute our primary cash requirement over the next twelve months. We
frequently consider potential acquisitions, and if we were to consummate an
acquisition, our cash requirements would increase and we may have to modify our
expected financing sources for the purchase of tractors. Subject to any
required lender approval, we may make acquisitions in the future. Our
principal sources of liquidity are cash generated from operations, bank
borrowings, capital and operating lease financing of revenue equipment, and
proceeds from the sale of used revenue equipment.
As of
September 30, 2008, we had on order 1,625 tractors and 200 trailers for delivery
through fiscal 2010. These revenue equipment orders represent a capital
commitment of approximately $159.2 million, before considering the proceeds of
equipment dispositions. We are using a mixture of cash and off
balance sheet debt to purchase our new tractors and are using off balance sheet
debt to acquire most of the new trailers. At September 30, 2008,
our total balance sheet debt, including capital lease obligations and current
maturities less cash, was $81.0 million, compared to $77.4 million at September
30, 2007. Our debt-to-capitalization ratio (total balance sheet debt as a
percentage of total balance sheet debt plus total stockholders’ equity) was
35.7% at September 30, 2008, and 51.1% at September 30, 2007.
We
believe we will be able to fund our operating expenses, as well as our current
commitments for the acquisition of revenue equipment over the next twelve
months, with a combination of cash generated from operations, borrowings
available under our primary credit facility, and lease financing
arrangements. We will continue to have significant capital
requirements over the long term, and the availability of the needed capital will
depend upon our financial condition and operating results and numerous other
factors over which we have limited or no control, including prevailing market
conditions and the market price of our common stock. However, based on our
operating results, anticipated future cash flows, current availability under our
credit facility, and sources of equipment lease financing that we expect will be
available to us, we do not expect to experience significant liquidity
constraints in the foreseeable future.
Cash
Flows
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, net cash provided by operations
was $19.3 million, compared to cash provided by operations of $10.6 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2007. Cash provided by
operations increased primarily due to a decrease in trade receivables and a
decrease in net income tax receivable.
Net cash
used in investing activities was $0.2 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of
$4.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Cash used
in investing activities includes the net cash effect of acquisitions and
dispositions of revenue equipment during each period. Capital
expenditures for equipment totaled $10.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008, and $3.2 million for the three months ended September 30,
2007, a portion of which was attributable to the increase in tractors purchased
with cash. We generated proceeds from the sale of property and
equipment of $10.4 million and $7.8 million for the three months ended September
30, 2008, and September 30, 2007, respectively.
Net cash used in financing activities was $21.3 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008, compared to $16.4 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. The increase in cash used was primarily due to an
increase in payments of long-term debt. Financing activity represents
borrowings (new borrowings, net of repayment) and payments of the principal
component of capital lease obligations.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Operating
leases have been an important source of financing for our revenue equipment.
Our operating leases include some under which we do not guarantee the
value of the asset at the end of the lease term ("walk-away leases") and some
under which we do guarantee the value of the asset at the end of the lease term
("residual value"). Therefore, we are subject to the risk that equipment
value may decline, in which case we would suffer a loss upon disposition and be
required to make cash payments because of the residual value guarantees.
We were obligated for residual value guarantees related to operating leases of
$76.8 million at September 30, 2008 compared to $62.7 million at
September 30, 2007. We believe that any residual payment obligations
that are not covered by the manufacturer will be satisfied by the value of
the related equipment at the end of the lease. To the extent the expected
value at the lease termination date is lower than the residual value guarantee;
we would accrue for the difference over the remaining lease term. We
anticipate that going forward we will use a combination of cash generated from
operations and operating leases to finance tractor purchases and operating
leases to finance trailer purchases.
Primary Credit Agreement
On September 26, 2005, Celadon Group, Inc., Celadon Trucking Services, Inc., and
TruckersB2B entered into an unsecured Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement")
with LaSalle Bank National Association, as administrative agent, and LaSalle
Bank National Association, Fifth Third Bank (Central Indiana), and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as lenders. The Credit Agreement was amended on
December 23, 2005, by the First Amendment to Credit Agreement, pursuant to which
Celadon Logistics Services, Inc. was added as a borrower to the Credit
Agreement. The Credit Agreement, as amended by the Third Amendment on
January 22, 2008, matures on January 23, 2013. The Credit Agreement
is intended to provide for ongoing working capital needs and general corporate
purposes. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are based, at the
option of the Company, on a base rate equal to the greater of the federal funds
rate plus 0.5% and the administrative agent's prime rate or LIBOR plus an
applicable margin between 0.75% and 1.125% that is adjusted quarterly based on
cash flow coverage. The Credit Agreement is guaranteed by Celadon
E-Commerce, Inc., CelCan, and Jaguar, each of which is a subsidiary of the
Company.
The Credit Agreement, as amended by the
Third Amendment, has a maximum revolving borrowing limit of $70.0 million, and
the Company may increase the revolving borrowing limit by an additional $20.0
million, to a total of $90.0 million. Letters of credit are limited
to an aggregate commitment of $15.0 million and a swing line facility has a
limit of $5.0 million. A commitment fee that is adjusted quarterly
between 0.15% and 0.225% per annum based on cash flow coverage is due on the
daily unused portion of the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement
contains certain restrictions and covenants relating to, among other things,
dividends, tangible net worth, cash flow, mergers, consolidations, acquisitions
and dispositions, and total indebtedness. We were in compliance with
these covenants at September 30, 2008, and expect to remain in compliance for
the foreseeable future. At September 30, 2008, $25.7 million of our
credit facility was utilized as outstanding borrowings and $4.5 million was
utilized for standby letters of credit.
Contractual
Obligations
As of September 30, 2008, our
operating leases, capitalized leases, other debts, and future commitments have
stated maturities or minimum annual payments as follows:
|
|
Annual
Cash Requirements
as
of September 30, 2008
(in
thousands)
Payments
Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less
than
1 year
|
|
|
1-3
Years
|
|
|
3-5
Years
|
|
|
More
than
5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
leases
|
|
$ |
83,213 |
|
|
$ |
22,759 |
|
|
$ |
32,012 |
|
|
$ |
16,497 |
|
|
$ |
11,945 |
|
Lease
residual value guarantees
|
|
|
76,760 |
|
|
|
19,285 |
|
|
|
22,244 |
|
|
|
16,215 |
|
|
|
19,016 |
|
Capital
leases(1)
|
|
|
52,280 |
|
|
|
8,528 |
|
|
|
25,692 |
|
|
|
18,060 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Long-term
debt(1)
|
|
|
35,935 |
|
|
|
8,948 |
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
25,665 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Sub-total
|
|
$ |
248,188 |
|
|
$ |
59,520 |
|
|
$ |
81,270 |
|
|
$ |
76,437 |
|
|
$ |
30,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
purchase of revenue equipment
|
|
$ |
159,155 |
|
|
$ |
30,758 |
|
|
$ |
81,889 |
|
|
$ |
43,732 |
|
|
$ |
2,776 |
|
Employment
and consulting agreements(2)
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
Standby
Letters of
Credit
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
412,543 |
|
|
$ |
95,478 |
|
|
$ |
163,159 |
|
|
$ |
120,169 |
|
|
$ |
33,737 |
|
(1)
|
Includes
interest.
|
(2)
|
The
amounts reflected in the table do not include amounts that could become
payable to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
under certain circumstances if their employment by the Company is
terminated.
|
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
preparation of our financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions
that impact the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Therefore, the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues, expenses, and associated disclosures of contingent assets
and liabilities are affected by these estimates and assumptions. We
evaluate these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, utilizing
historical experience, consultation with experts, and other methods considered
reasonable in the particular circumstances. Nevertheless, actual results
may differ significantly from our estimates and assumptions, and it is possible
that materially different amounts would be reported using differing estimates or
assumptions. We consider our critical accounting policies to be those that
require us to make more significant judgments and estimates when we prepare our
financial statements. Our critical accounting policies include the
following:
Depreciation of Property and
Equipment. We depreciate our property and equipment using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset. We
generally use estimated useful lives of two to seven years for tractors and
trailers, and estimated salvage values for tractors and trailers generally range
from 35% to 50% of the capitalized cost. Gains and losses on the disposal
of revenue equipment are included in depreciation expense in our statements of
operations.
We review
the reasonableness of our estimates regarding useful lives and salvage values of
our revenue equipment and other long-lived assets based upon, among other
things, our experience with similar assets, conditions in the used equipment
market, and prevailing industry practice. Changes in our useful life or
salvage value estimates or fluctuations in market values that are not reflected
in our estimates, could have a material effect on our results of
operations.
Revenue
equipment and other long-lived assets are tested for impairment whenever an
event occurs that indicates an impairment may exist. Expected future cash
flows are used to analyze whether an impairment has occurred. If the sum
of expected undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the
long-lived asset, then an impairment loss is recognized. We measure the
impairment loss by comparing the fair value of the asset to its carrying
value. Fair value is determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis
or the appraised or estimated market value of the asset, as
appropriate.
Operating leases. We have financed a substantial percentage of
our tractors and trailers with operating leases. These leases
generally contain residual value guarantees, which provide that the value of
equipment returned to the lessor at the end of the lease term will be no lower
than a negotiated amount. To the extent that the value of the equipment is
below the negotiated amount, we are liable to the lessor for the shortage at the
expiration of the lease. For all equipment, we are required to
recognize additional rental expense to the extent we believe the fair market
value at the lease termination will be less than our obligation to the
lessor.
In accordance with SFAS 13, Accounting for Leases,
property and equipment held under operating leases, and liabilities related
thereto, are not reflected on our balance sheet. All expenses related to
revenue equipment operating leases are reflected on our statements of operations
in the line item entitled "Revenue equipment rentals." As such, financing
revenue equipment with operating leases instead of bank borrowings or capital
leases effectively moves the interest component of the financing arrangement
into operating expenses on our statements of operations.
Claims
Reserves and Estimates. The primary claims
arising for us consist of cargo liability, personal injury, property damage,
collision and comprehensive, workers' compensation, and employee medical
expenses. We maintain self-insurance levels for these various areas of
risk and have established reserves to cover these self-insured
liabilities. We also maintain insurance to cover liabilities in excess of
these self-insurance amounts. Claims reserves represent accruals for the
estimated uninsured portion of reported claims, including adverse development of
reported claims, as well as estimates of incurred but not reported claims.
Reported claims and related loss reserves are estimated by third party
administrators, and we refer to these estimates in establishing our
reserves. Claims incurred but not reported are estimated based on our
historical experience and industry trends, which are continually monitored, and
accruals are adjusted when warranted by changes in facts and
circumstances. In establishing our reserves we must take into account and
estimate various factors, including, but not limited to, assumptions concerning
the nature and severity of the claim, the effect of the jurisdiction on any
award or settlement, the length of time until ultimate resolution, inflation
rates in health care, and in general interest rates, legal expenses, and other
factors. Our actual experience may be different than our estimates,
sometimes significantly. Changes in assumptions as well as changes in
actual experience could cause these estimates to change in the near term.
Insurance and claims expense will vary from period to period based on the
severity and frequency of claims incurred in a given period.
Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes represent a
substantial liability on our consolidated balance sheet. Deferred income
taxes are determined in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the expected future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards.
We evaluate our tax assets and liabilities on a periodic basis and adjust
these balances as appropriate. We believe that we have adequately provided
for our future tax consequences based upon current facts and circumstances and
current tax law. However, should our tax positions be challenged and not
prevail, different outcomes could result and have a significant impact on the
amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements.
The
carrying value of our deferred tax assets (tax benefits expected to be realized
in the future) assumes that we will be able to generate, based on certain
estimates and assumptions, sufficient future taxable income in certain tax
jurisdictions to utilize these deferred tax benefits. If these estimates
and related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to reduce the
value of the deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax
expense. We believe that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax
assets, net of valuation allowance, will be realized, based on forecasted
income. However, there can be no assurance that we will meet our forecasts
of future income. We evaluate the deferred tax assets on a periodic basis
and assess the need for additional valuation allowances.
Federal
income taxes are provided on that portion of the income of foreign subsidiaries
that is expected to be remitted to the United States.
Seasonality
We have substantial operations in the Midwestern and Eastern United States and
Canada. In those geographic regions, our tractor productivity may be
adversely affected during the winter season because inclement weather may impede
our operations. Moreover, some shippers reduce their shipments during
holiday periods as a result of curtailed operations or vacation
shutdowns. At the same time, operating expenses generally increase,
with fuel efficiency declining because of engine idling and harsh weather
creating higher accident frequency, increased claims, and more equipment
repairs.
Inflation
Many of our operating expenses, including fuel costs, revenue equipment, and
driver compensation, are sensitive to the effects of inflation, which result in
higher operating costs and reduced operating income. The effects of
inflation on our business during the past three years were most significant in
fuel. The effects of inflation on revenue were not material in the
past three years. We have limited the effects of inflation through
increases in freight rates and fuel surcharges.
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We experience various market risks, including changes in interest rates, foreign
currency exchange rates, and fuel prices. We do not enter into
derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes,
nor when there are no underlying related exposures.
Interest
Rate Risk. We are exposed to interest rate risk principally
from our primary credit facility. The credit facility carries a
maximum variable interest rate of either the bank's base rate or LIBOR plus
1.125%. At September 30, 2008 the interest rate for revolving
borrowings under our credit facility was LIBOR plus 0.875%, an effective rate of
4.584%. At September 30, 2008, we had $25.7 million variable rate
term loan borrowings outstanding under the credit facility. A
hypothetical 10% increase in the bank's base rate and LIBOR would be immaterial
to our net income.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk. We are subject to foreign
currency exchange rate risk, specifically in connection with our Canadian
operations. While virtually all of the expenses associated with our
Canadian operations, such as independent contractor costs, Company driver
compensation, and administrative costs, are paid in Canadian dollars, a
significant portion of our revenue generated from those operations is billed in
U.S. dollars because many of our customers are U.S. shippers transporting goods
to or from Canada. As a result, increases in the Canadian dollar
exchange rate adversely affect the profitability of our Canadian
operations. Assuming revenue and expenses for our Canadian operations
identical to that in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 (both in terms of amount
and currency mix), we estimate that a $0.01 decrease in the Canadian dollar
exchange rate would reduce our annual net income by approximately
$33,000.
We
generally do not face the same magnitude of foreign currency exchange rate risk
in connection with our intra-Mexico operations conducted through our Mexican
subsidiary, Jaguar, because our foreign currency revenues are generally
proportionate to our foreign currency expenses for those
operations. For purposes of consolidation, however, the operating
results earned by our subsidiaries, including Jaguar, in foreign currencies are
converted into United States dollars. As a result, a decrease in the
value of the Mexican peso could adversely affect our consolidated results of
operations. Assuming revenue and expenses for our Mexican operations
identical to that in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 (both in terms of amount
and currency mix), we estimate that a $0.01 decrease in the Mexican peso
exchange rate would reduce our annual net income by approximately
$17,000.
Commodity Price
Risk. Shortages of fuel, increases in prices, or rationing of
petroleum products can have a materially adverse effect on our operations and
profitability. Fuel is subject to economic, political, and market
factors that are outside of our control. Historically, we have sought
to recover a portion of short-term increases in fuel prices from customers
through the collection of fuel surcharges. However, fuel surcharges
do not always fully offset increases in fuel prices. In addition,
from time-to-time we may enter into derivative financial instruments to reduce
our exposure to fuel price fluctuations. In accordance with SFAS 133
and SFAS 138, we adjust any such derivative instruments to fair value through
earnings on a monthly basis. As of September 30, 2008, we had no
derivative financial instruments in place to reduce our exposure to fuel price
fluctuations.
As required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), the Company has carried out an evaluation
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. This evaluation was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. Based
upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the
end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q. There were no changes in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the first quarter of fiscal 2009 that
have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's
reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and
forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Disclosure controls
and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in Company reports filed under the Exchange
Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding disclosures.
The Company has confidence in its disclosure controls and
procedures. Nevertheless, the Company's management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our
disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors or intentional
fraud. An internal control system, no matter how well conceived and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of such internal controls are met. Further, the design of
an internal control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all internal control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been
detected.
Part
II. Other
Information
There are various claims, lawsuits, and pending actions against the Company and
its subsidiaries which arose in the normal course of the operations of its
business. The Company believes many of these proceedings are covered
in whole or in part by insurance and that none of these matters will have a
material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position or results of
operations in any given period.
On August
8, 2007, the 384th District Court of the State of Texas situated in El Paso,
Texas, rendered a judgment against CTSI, for approximately $3.4 million in the
case of Martinez v. Celadon Trucking Services, Inc., which was originally filed
on September 4, 2002. The case involves a workers' compensation claim
of a former employee of CTSI who suffered a back injury as a result of a traffic
accident. CTSI and the Company believe all actions taken were proper
and legal and contend that the proper and exclusive place for resolution of this
dispute was before the Indiana Worker's Compensation Board. While
there can be no certainty as to the outcome, the Company believes that the
ultimate resolution of this dispute will not have a materially adverse effect on
its consolidated financial position or results of operations. CTSI
filed an appeal of the decision to the Texas Court of Appeals in October
2007. Trial transcripts have been prepared for the Court of Appeals
and appellate briefing is in process.
While we attempt to identify, manage, and mitigate risks and uncertainties
associated with our business, some level of risk and uncertainty will always be
present. Our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008, in the
section entitled Item 1A. Risk Factors, describes some of the risks and
uncertainties associated with our business. These risks and
uncertainties have the potential to materially affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations, cash flows, projected results, and future
prospects.
Our business is subject to certain credit factors affecting the trucking
industry that are largely out of our control and that could have a material
adverse effect on our operating results.
Recently, there has been widespread concern over the instability of the credit
markets and the current credit market effects on the economy. If the
economy and credit markets continue to weaken, our business, financial results,
and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, especially
if consumer confidence declines and domestic spending
decreases. Additionally, the stresses in the credit market have
caused uncertainty in the equity markets, which may result in volatility of the
market price for our securities.
If the
credit markets continue to erode, we also may not be able to access our current
sources of credit and our lenders may not have the capital to fund those
sources. We may need to incur additional indebtedness or issue debt or
equity securities in the future to refinance existing debt, fund working capital
requirements, make investments, or for general corporate purposes. As
a result of contractions in the credit market, as well as other economic trends
in the credit market industry, we may not be able to secure financing for future
activities on satisfactory terms, or at all. If we are not successful
in obtaining sufficient financing because we are unable to access the capital
markets on financially economical or feasible terms, it could impact our ability
to provide services to our customers and may materially and adversely affect our
business, financial results, results of operations, and potential
investments.
3.1
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, effective
January 12, 2006. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending
December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on January 30,
2006.)
|
3.2
|
Certificate
of Designation for Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000, filed with
the SEC on September 28, 2000.)
|
3.3
|
Amended
and Restated By-laws of the Company. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on July 3, 2006.)
|
4.1
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, effective
January 12, 2006. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ending December 31, 2005, filed with the SEC on January 30,
2006.)
|
4.2
|
Certificate
of Designation for Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000, filed with
the SEC on September 28, 2000.)
|
4.3
|
Rights
Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2000, between Celadon Group, Inc. and
Fleet National Bank, as Rights Agent. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
8-A, filed with the SEC on July 20, 2000.)
|
4.4
|
Amended
and Restated By-laws of the Company. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on July 3, 2006.)
|
|
Certification
pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Stephen Russell, the
Company's Chief Executive Officer.*
|
|
Certification
pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Paul Will, the Company's
Chief Financial Officer.*
|
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, by Stephen Russell, the Company's Chief
Executive Officer.*
|
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Paul Will, the Company's Chief
Financial Officer.*
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Celadon
Group, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stephen Russell |
|
Stephen
Russell
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paul Will |
|
Paul
Will
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,
Treasurer,
and Assistant Secretary
|
|
|
Date: October
30, 2008
|
|