Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
Quanex Building Products Corp. | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION | January 26, 2018 | |
1800 West Loop South Suite 1500 Houston, Texas 77027 (713) 961-4600 |
Dear Fellow Stockholder: You are cordially invited to attend the Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 8:00 a.m., C.S.T., on Thursday, March 1, 2018, at the Company's principal executive offices at 1800 West Loop South, Suite 1500, Houston, Texas. |
|
This year you will be asked to vote in favor of the election of four directors, in favor of an advisory vote approving the Company's named executive officer compensation, and in favor of a resolution ratifying the Company's appointment of its independent auditor for the 2018 fiscal year. These proposals are more fully explained in the attached Proxy Statement, which you are encouraged to read. |
||
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE IN FAVOR OF EACH PROPOSAL OUTLINED IN THE ATTACHED PROXY. THE BOARD FURTHER URGES YOU TO VOTE AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING. |
||
Thank you for your continued support. |
||
Sincerely, |
||
William C. Griffiths | ||
Chairman of the Board |
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held March 1, 2018
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Quanex Building Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company" or "Quanex"), will be held at the principal executive offices of the Company, 1800 West Loop South, Suite 1500, Houston, Texas, 77027, on Thursday, March 1, 2018, at 8:00 a.m., C.S.T., for the following purposes:
Information with respect to the above matters is set forth in the Proxy Statement that accompanies this Notice.
The Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board of Directors" or "Board") has fixed the close of business on January 10, 2018, as the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. A complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be maintained at the Company's principal executive offices, will be open to the examination of any stockholder for any purpose germane to the meeting during ordinary business hours for a period of ten days prior to the meeting, and will be made available at the time and place of the meeting during the whole time thereof.
Please execute your vote promptly. Your designation of a proxy is revocable and will not affect your right to vote in person if you find it convenient to attend the meeting and wish to vote in person.
The Company's Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017, accompanies this Notice.
By order of the Board of Directors, | ||
Kevin P. Delaney Senior Vice PresidentGeneral Counsel and Secretary |
Houston,
Texas
January 26, 2018
PROXY STATEMENT
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To Be Held March 1, 2018
This Proxy Statement and the accompanying form of proxy are to be first mailed on or about January 26, 2018, to all holders of record on January 10, 2018 (the "Record Date"), of the common stock, $.01 par value (the "Common Stock"), of Quanex Building Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"). These materials are furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of the Company to be used at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the Company's principal executive offices, 1800 West Loop South, Suite 1500, Houston, Texas, 77027, at 8:00 a.m., C.S.T., on Thursday, March 1, 2018, and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof. Shares of Common Stock represented by any un-revoked proxy in the enclosed form, if such proxy is properly executed and is received prior to the meeting, will be voted in accordance with the specifications made on such proxy. Proxies on which no specifications have been made will be voted FOR the election as director of the nominees listed herein, FOR ratification of the appointment of the Company's independent auditor for fiscal 2018, and FOR each other proposal included herein. Proxies are revocable by written notice to the Secretary of the Company at the address of the Company set forth below, or by delivery of a later dated proxy, at any time prior to their exercise. Proxies may also be revoked by a stockholder attending and voting in person at the meeting.
The Common Stock is the only class of securities of the Company that is entitled to vote at the meeting. As of the close of business on the Record Date, the date for determining stockholders who are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting, there were 35,070,482 shares of Common Stock outstanding. Each share is entitled to one vote. The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of shares of Common Stock is necessary to constitute a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present in determining whether the quorum requirement is satisfied.
The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. Solicitation may be made personally or by mail, telephone or electronic data transfer by officers, directors and regular employees of the Company (who will not receive any additional compensation for any solicitation of proxies), or by the firm of Morrow Sodali, LLC, which has been retained by the Company to assist in the solicitation for a fee of approximately $7,500 plus expenses. The Company will also reimburse brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses for sending proxy materials to the beneficial owners of Common Stock. The mailing address of the Company's principal executive office is 1800 West Loop South, Suite 1500, Houston, Texas, 77027.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON MARCH 1, 2018:
Our Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report are available online at the following web address:
In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules, this website provides complete anonymity with respect to any stockholder accessing it.
1
MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE MEETING
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Four directors are to be elected at the meeting. Prior to March 2016, the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws provided that the Board of Directors would be divided into three classes as nearly equal in number as possible, with the terms of office of the classes expiring at different times. Class III directors will stand for election at the Company's annual stockholder meeting to be held in 2019, and Class I and Class II directors are standing for election at the annual meeting to which this proxy relates. However, in accordance with amendments approved at the Company's 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Board of Directors is currently in the process of declassifying, and each director will now be elected to a term of only one year.
Current directors Robert R. Buck, Susan F. Davis, Joseph D. Rupp and Curtis M. Stevens are the directors currently standing for election. Ms. Davis and Mr. Stevens were each elected by the stockholders in 2017 to a term ending in 2018, while Messrs. Buck and Rupp were each elected by the stockholders in 2015 to a term ending in 2018. Each of these directors are standing for re-election for a term expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting. Messrs. Griffiths and Nosbaum were elected to a term ending in 2019 at the 2016 Annual Meeting.
In reviewing the information contained in this Proxy Statement that relates to our directors and officers, it is important to note that Quanex Building Products Corporation was initially created on December 12, 2007, in connection with the April 2008 spin-off of the building products business of Quanex Corporation, and the related merger of Quanex Corporation with Gerdau S.A. In connection with these transactions, the directors and officers of Quanex Corporation became the directors and officers of Quanex Building Products Corporation. As such, we have listed these "carryover" directors and officers as beginning with the Company in 2007 despite the fact that they may have served in similar positions with Quanex Corporation prior to that time. For information related to the transaction, the origins of Quanex Building Products Corporation, and any pre-transaction service as a director or officer of Quanex Corporation, please see (a) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008, (b) the Information Statement attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 10, filed April 4, 2008 and effective April 9, 2008, and (c) Quanex Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by Form 10-K/A, for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007.
Nominees for election to a term that will expire at the 2019 Annual Meeting (formerly Class I and Class II Directors) |
Principal Occupation | Age | Director Since |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert R. Buck | Chairman of the Board of Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc., a leading distributor of roofing materials (Herndon, Virginia). | 70 | 2011 | |||
Susan F. Davis |
Retired Executive Vice PresidentAsia Pacific of Johnson Controls, Inc., a global leader in automotive systems, building efficiency and power solutions (Milwaukee, Wisconsin). |
64 |
2007 |
|||
Joseph D. Rupp |
Retired Chairman of the Board of Olin Corporation, a basic materials company concentrated in chemicals and ammunition (Clayton, Missouri). |
67 |
2007 |
|||
Curtis M. Stevens |
Retired Chief Executive Officer of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, a leading building materials manufacturer (Nashville, Tennessee). |
65 |
2010 |
2
Directors whose terms expire at the 2019 Annual Meeting (formerly Class III Directors) |
Principal Occupation | Age | Director Since |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
William C. Griffiths | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Quanex Building Products Corporation (Houston, Texas). | 66 | 2009 | |||
LeRoy D. Nosbaum |
Retired President and Chief Executive Officer of Itron, Inc., a leading technology provider to the global energy and water industries and a leading provider of intelligent metering, data collection and utility software solutions (Liberty Lake, Washington). |
71 |
2010 |
Director Biographies, Key Attributes, and Skills
Biography: Mr. Buck is the Chairman of the Board of Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc., a NASDAQ-traded roofing materials distributor with approximately $7 billion in revenue. Prior to becoming Chairman in early 2011, Mr. Buck served as Chairman and CEO of Beacon from 2007 to 2011; as Chairman, President, and CEO in 2007; and as President and CEO from 2003 to 2007. Prior to joining Beacon in 2003, Mr. Buck spent 21 years with Cintas Corporation in various executive positions. Mr. Buck holds a B.S. in Finance from the University of Cincinnati.
Key Attributes, Experience, and Skills: During his time at Beacon Roofing and Cintas Corporation, Mr. Buck developed extensive executive leadership, finance and accounting expertise. Mr. Buck also participated in numerous mergers and acquisitions and has strong corporate governance experience. In addition, Mr. Buck's tenure at Beacon Roofing has provided him substantial experience in the building products industry. Mr. Buck has also amassed a good deal of public company board experience through his service on the boards of Beacon Roofing Supply, Multi-Color Corporation, and Kendle International.
Other Directorships Since 2012: Mr. Buck currently serves on the boards of Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc., and Multi-Color Corporation. Mr. Buck also serves on the board of privately held Elkay Manufacturing Co.
Biography: Ms. Davis retired in 2016 from Johnson Controls, Inc., a global leader in automotive systems, building efficiency and power solutions. Prior to her retirement, Ms. Davis served as the Executive Vice PresidentAsia Pacific for Johnson Controls, beginning in 2015. Prior to her appointment to that position, Ms. Davis served as the chief human resources officer of Johnson Controls from 1994 to 2015, holding the positions of Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer from 2014 to 2015, Executive Vice President of Human Resources from 2006 to 2014, and Vice President of Human Resources from 1994 to 2006. Prior to that time, she served in various other positions with Johnson Controls, which she originally joined in 1983. Ms. Davis received an MBA degree from the University of Michigan, and received both Master's and Bachelor's degrees from Beloit College.
Key Attributes, Experience, and Skills: As the executive leader of Human Resources for Johnson Controls from 1994 to 2015, and through her role as Executive Vice PresidentAsia Pacific from 2015 to 2016, Ms. Davis acquired extensive management, corporate governance, public company, and international business expertise. She has also worked extensively with executive compensation and management development issues. Further, Ms. Davis' time as a director for Butler Manufacturing and Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, and Johnson Controls' status as a global leader in building efficiency
3
products and controls, has provided Ms. Davis with the opportunity to accumulate extensive experience in the building products industry and with manufacturing processes, both of which are very valuable in her service as a director of the Company. Ms. Davis also gained public company board experience as a result of her prior service as a director for Butler Manufacturing and Quanex Corporation.
Other Directorships Since 2012: Ms. Davis currently serves on the board of Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, which she joined in 2016.
Biography: Mr. Griffiths was named Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in July 2013, after serving as an independent director of the Company beginning in 2009. Prior to joining the Company as President and CEO, Mr. Griffiths served as the Managing Director and a member of the board of directors of Sealine (International) Ltd., a privately held manufacturer of yachts and other marine vessels based in the United Kingdom. Prior to joining Sealine in January 2012, Mr. Griffiths served as Chairman of the Board, President and CEO of Champion Enterprises, Inc., a NYSE-traded producer of modular and manufactured housing until 2010. He joined Champion as a Director, and as President and Chief Executive Officer, in August 2004, and was named Chairman of the Board in 2006. Champion filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on November 15, 2009. From 2001 to 2004, Mr. Griffiths was PresidentFluid Systems Division at SPX Corporation, a global multi-industry company located in Charlotte, North Carolina. Mr. Griffiths graduated from the University of London with a BS with Honors in Mining Engineering. In addition, Mr. Griffiths is a graduate of the Harvard Business School's PMD executive education program.
Key Attributes, Experience, and Skills: During his tenure as CEO of Champion Enterprises, Mr. Griffiths gained extensive experience with manufacturing processes, corporate governance, and public company issues. Champion also provided Mr. Griffiths with valuable expertise and insight into the building products industry, which he has continued to build during his tenure at Quanex Building Products Corporation. In addition, Mr. Griffiths' time as a senior leader at SPX Corporation provided him with extensive and wide-reaching expertise in international operations management and international business in general. It also allowed him to build a great deal of experience in mergers and acquisitions, both international and domestic.
Biography: Mr. Nosbaum is the retired Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Itron, Inc., a NASDAQ-traded leading technology provider to the global energy and water industries and a leading provider of intelligent metering, data collection and utility software solutions. Mr. Nosbaum joined Itron in 1996, was promoted to the role of President and CEO in 2000, and was elected as Chairman in 2002. He retired from Itron in 2009, but returned as President and Chief Executive Officer in 2011, before retiring again in December 2012. Prior to his employment with Itron, Mr. Nosbaum served in various positions at Metricom, Inc. from 1989 to 1996, and at Schlumberger Limited from 1977 to 1989. Mr. Nosbaum holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Valparaiso University.
Key Attributes, Experience, and Skills: Mr. Nosbaum brings to the board strong sales, marketing and technology expertise, which he gained during his service as the Executive VP of Marketing and Sales for Metricom, Inc. In his various roles at Itron, Mr. Nosbaum also built extensive public company, finance, strategic development, acquisition, technology and manufacturing process expertise. Further, Mr. Nosbaum gained international experience at Itron, which conducts operations throughout Europe, South America, and Asia. In addition, he has built corporate governance expertise both through his role as CEO of Itron, and through his service on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees of Esterline Technologies and Quanex Building Products Corporation.
4
Other Directorships Since 2012: Mr. Nosbaum served as director of Itron from 2000 to 2002 and as Chairman from 2002 to 2009. After a brief interval, Mr. Nosbaum again served as a director of Itron from 2011 until his retirement in December 2012.
Mr. Rupp is the retired Chairman of the Board of Olin Corporation, an NYSE traded basic materials company concentrated in chemicals and ammunition. Mr. Rupp served as the Chairman of the Board of Olin Corporation from May 2016 to April 2017. Prior to May 2016, Mr. Rupp served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Olin since 2005. Prior to his election as Chairman, Mr. Rupp was President and Chief Executive Officer of Olin from 2002 to 2005. Prior to 2002, Mr. Rupp served in various positions with Olin, which he originally joined in 1972. Mr. Rupp holds a bachelor's degree in metallurgical engineering from the University of Missouri, Rolla.
Key Attributes, Experience, and Skills: As the CEO of Olin, Mr. Rupp amassed strong corporate governance expertise, public company management experience, and solid financial acumen. He also brings a wealth of experience in operations management, lean manufacturing processes, and mergers and acquisitions. In addition, he has gained extensive public board experience as a director of Olin from 2002 to 2017 and as a director of Quanex Building Products since 2008.
Other Directorships Since 2012: Mr. Rupp served as a director of Olin Corporation from 2002 to 2005, and as Chairman of Olin's board from 2005 until his retirement in 2017. Mr. Rupp also currently serves on the Boards of Cass Information Systems and Owens-Illinois, Inc.
Biography: Mr. Stevens retired in June 2017 from Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, an NYSE traded building materials manufacturer. Prior to his retirement, Mr. Stevens served as the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Louisiana-Pacific from 2012 to June 2017. Prior to becoming CEO in May 2012, Mr. Stevens served as Louisiana-Pacific's Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President beginning in December 2011. Prior to assuming the role of Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Stevens served as Chief Financial Officer of Louisiana-Pacific since 1997, and as Executive Vice President, Administration, since 2002. Before joining Louisiana-Pacific, Mr. Stevens served for 14 years in various financial and operational positions at Planar Systems, a flat-panel display products manufacturer. Mr. Stevens holds a B.A. in Economics and an M.B.A with a concentration in Finance from the University of California at Los Angeles.
Key Attributes, Experience, and Skills: Through his various roles at Louisiana-Pacific, Mr. Stevens acquired broad experience in the building products industry. He also possesses a strong background in accounting and finance, as well as extensive expertise in information technology and supply chain management, strategy development, and public company issues. Further, Louisiana-Pacific's international operations have provided Mr. Stevens with strong international business experience.
Other Directorships Since 2012: Mr. Stevens served on the board of Louisiana-Pacific from 2012 until his retirement in 2017.
The Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that Ms. Davis and each of Messrs. Buck, Nosbaum, Rupp, and Stevens have no material relationship with the Company and have satisfied the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. In assessing director independence, the Board of Directors considered the relationships (as a customer or supplier or otherwise) of the Company with various companies with which such directors may be affiliated and has determined that there are no such relationships that, in the opinion of the Board, might impact any director's independence. In making this assessment, the Board took into account the level of transactions with such companies in relationship to the Company's and the other parties' aggregate sales, the level of
5
director involvement in such transactions and the ability of such directors to influence such transactions. Based on its review, the Board determined that no transactions occurred during the year that might affect any non-employee director's independence. During the fiscal year, the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee determined that there were no "related person" transactions, as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, each of such directors has met the definitions of "non-employee director" under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and "outside director" under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
There are no arrangements or understandings between any person and any of the directors pursuant to which such director was selected as a nominee for election at the Meeting, and there are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers of the Company. Ms. Davis and Messrs. Buck, Rupp and Stevens have each indicated a willingness to serve if elected. If a nominee should be unable to serve or will not serve for any reason, and if any other person is nominated, the persons designated on the accompanying form of proxy will have discretionary authority to vote or refrain from voting in accordance with their judgment on such other nominee unless authority to vote on such matter is withheld.
To be elected as a director, a director nominee must receive a majority of votes cast at the meeting with respect to such nominee (the number of shares voted "FOR" a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast "AGAINST" that nominee). Cumulative voting is not permitted in the election of directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be treated as a vote for or against any particular director nominee and will not affect the outcome of the election of directors.
Pursuant to the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, any current director that is nominated for election must tender his or her resignation as a director in the event that he or she receives more "AGAINST" votes than "FOR" votes. In such an event, the Governance Committee and subsequently the full Board would then review and determine whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation. The Board is required to publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within ninety days from the date of the certification of the election results.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote "FOR" the elections of Ms. Davis and Messrs. Buck, Rupp and Stevens. Unless you give contrary instructions in your proxy, your proxy will be voted "FOR" the elections of Ms. Davis and Messrs. Buck, Rupp and Stevens. If any nominee should become unable or unwilling to accept nomination or election, the person acting under the proxy will vote for the election of such other person as the Board of Directors may recommend. The Board has no reason, however, to believe that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected.
6
PROPOSAL NO. 2
ADVISORY VOTE APPROVING NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
At the meeting, the stockholders will vote on an advisory resolution approving the compensation of the Company's named executive officers, as required pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act.
We believe that our compensation practices and procedures are competitive, focused on pay-for-performance and strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. This advisory stockholder vote, commonly known as "Say-on-Pay," gives you as a stockholder the opportunity to express approval or withhold approval of the compensation we pay our named executive officers through voting for or against the following resolution:
"Resolved, that the stockholders approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K in the Company's 2018 Proxy Statement, which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other executive compensation tables and related discussion."
The Company and the Compensation & Management Development Committee (the "Compensation Committee") remain committed to the compensation philosophy, practices, and objectives outlined under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" located on page 14 of this Proxy Statement. As always, the Compensation Committee will continue to review all elements of the executive compensation program and take any steps it deems necessary to continue to fulfill the objectives of the program.
Stockholders are encouraged to carefully review the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this Proxy Statement for a detailed discussion of the Company's executive compensation program.
Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Company or the Board of Directors. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.
Unless the Board modifies its policy on the frequency on holding Say-on-Pay advisory votes, Say-on-Pay votes by our stockholders take place at each Annual Meeting, and the next such vote will occur at the annual meeting to which this Proxy Statement relates.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal is necessary to approve the Say-on-Pay proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the Say-on-Pay proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the Say-on-Pay proposal.
The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" the ratification of the advisory resolution approving the compensation of the Company's named executive officers.
7
PROPOSAL NO. 3
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDIT FIRM
The Audit Committee has selected Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, to audit the Company's consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2018. Grant Thornton LLP has been the Company's independent registered public accounting firm since April 2014, when it was retained by the Audit Committee after the completion of a competitive process to select an auditor for the Company's fiscal 2014 financial statements. We are asking the stockholders to ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2018. Grant Thornton LLP was appointed by the Audit Committee in accordance with its charter.
In the event stockholders fail to ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP, the Audit Committee may reconsider this appointment. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the Company's and its stockholders' best interests.
The Audit Committee has approved all services provided by Grant Thornton LLP. A representative of Grant Thornton LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions you may ask.
This vote requires approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal. Abstentions with respect to the approval of this proposal will have the effect of a vote "AGAINST" this proposal. Broker non-votes will not be counted for the purpose of determining the number of votes necessary for approval of this proposal.
The Board recommends that you vote "FOR" the ratification of appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2018.
8
Set forth below is certain information concerning the executive officers of the Company, each of whom serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. There is no family relationship between any of these individuals or between these individuals and any of the Company's directors. There are no arrangements or understandings between any person and any of the executive officers pursuant to which such executive officer was selected as an executive officer, except for arrangements or understandings with such executive officer acting solely in such executive officer's capacity as such.
Name and Age
|
Office and Length of Service | |
---|---|---|
William C. Griffiths, 66 | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer since 2013 | |
Brent L. Korb, 45 | Senior Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer since 2008 | |
Kevin P. Delaney, 56 | Senior Vice PresidentGeneral Counsel and Secretary since 2007 | |
George L. Wilson, 49 | Vice PresidentChief Operating Officer since 2017 | |
M. Dewayne Williams, 47 | Vice PresidentController since 2013 |
Mr. Griffiths was elected Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective July 9, 2013. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Griffiths served as the Managing Director and a member of the board of directors of Sealine (International) Ltd., a privately held manufacturer of yachts and other marine vessels based in the United Kingdom, from 2012 until it was sold in June 2013. Prior to joining Sealine in 2012, Mr. Griffiths served as Chairman of the Board, President and CEO of Champion Enterprises, Inc., a NYSE-traded producer of modular and manufactured housing until 2010. He joined Champion as a Director, and as President and Chief Executive Officer, in August 2004, and was named Chairman of the Board in 2006. Champion filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on November 15, 2009. From 2001 to 2004, Mr. Griffiths was PresidentFluid Systems Division at SPX Corporation, a global multi-industry company located in Charlotte, North Carolina. Mr. Griffiths graduated from the University of London with a B.S. with Honors in Mining Engineering. In addition, Mr. Griffiths is a graduate of the Harvard Business School's PMD executive education program.
Mr. Korb was named Senior Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company on August 1, 2008. Mr. Korb was named Vice PresidentController of Quanex Corporation in 2005, and was elected to the same position with the Company upon its creation on December 12, 2007. Prior to his election as Vice PresidentController of Quanex Corporation, Mr. Korb served as Assistant Controller of Quanex Corporation from 2003 to 2005. Prior to that time, Mr. Korb was Controller & Director of Business Analysis since 2003, and Manager of Business Analysis since 2001, of Resolution Performance Products, a manufacturer of specialty chemicals. From 1996 to 2001, Mr. Korb held various positions at Service Corporation International, a provider of funeral, cremation and cemetery services, including Director International Finance & Accounting, Manager International Finance & Accounting, Manager Corporate Development, Manager Strategic Planning, and Financial Analyst.
Mr. Delaney was named Senior Vice PresidentGeneral Counsel and Secretary of Quanex Corporation on February 24, 2005, and was elected to the same position with the Company upon its creation on December 12, 2007. Prior to that, he was Vice PresidentGeneral Counsel of Quanex Corporation since 2003, and Secretary since 2004. Prior to that he was Chief Counsel for Trane Residential Systems, a business of American Standard Companies, a global manufacturer with market leading positions in automotive, bath and kitchen, and air conditioning systems, since 2002; Assistant General Counsel for American Standard Companies since 2001; and Group Counsel for The Trane Company's North American Unitary Products Group since 1997. Prior to that time, Mr. Delaney was Vice PresidentGeneral Counsel with GS Roofing Products Company, Inc. from 1995 to 1997 and Senior Attorney with GTE Directories Corporation from 1991 to 1995.
Mr. Wilson was named Vice PresidentChief Operating Officer of the Company effective August 1, 2017. Prior to his appointment to that role, Mr. Wilson served as President and General
9
Manager of the Company's Insulating Glass Systems Division since 2011, and as General Manager of Edgetech I.G., Inc. beginning with its purchase by Quanex in March 2011 until it was consolidated with existing Quanex operations to create the Insulating Glass Systems Division. Prior to joining Quanex, Mr. Wilson served as the Vice President of Operations for Lauren Manufacturing from 2008 to 2010, and as the Vice President of Human Resources for its parent company Lauren International, a diversified manufacturer of polymers, rubbers and plastics, from 2010 to 2011. Prior to that time and beginning in 1993, Mr. Wilson served in various capacities of increasing responsibility for Federal Mogul, a Tier 1 manufacturer of various automobile components.
Mr. Williams was named Vice PresidentController of the Company effective July 1, 2013. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Williams served as the Vice PresidentAccounting, Corporate Controller, Chief Accounting Officer and Assistant Treasurer of Complete Production Services, Inc., a publicly held oilfield service provider, from 2009 until it was acquired by Superior Energy Services in 2012. In this role, Mr. Williams served as principal accounting officer and also provided cash management services, various treasury functions, and purchase accounting/transaction support. Prior to that, he served as Assistant Controller for Complete Production Services from 2005 to 2009. During the time from his 2012 departure from Complete Production Services until he joined the Company in 2013, Mr. Williams engaged in consulting work primarily related to purchase transaction accounting for several oilfield service companies.
10
DIRECTOR AND OFFICER COMPENSATION
Directors who are also employees of the Company do not receive any additional compensation for serving on the Board. In fiscal 2017, Mr. Griffiths was the only director who also served as an employee of the Company. As such, he did not receive any additional compensation for Board service, and has not since the date on which he became an employee.
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017, the Company's non-employee directors received the following compensation:
11
award granted to a newly appointed or elected director, is not eligible for any form of deferral or other payment timing election.
12
The table below shows the total compensation of our non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017.
Name
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) ($) |
Stock Unit Awards(2) ($) |
Option Awards(2) ($) |
Change in Pension Value & Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(3) ($) |
All Other Compensation(4) ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert R. Buck |
69,500 | 76,873 | | | 5,035 | 151,408 | |||||||||||||
Susan F. Davis |
71,250 | 76,873 | | | 6,584 | 154,707 | |||||||||||||
LeRoy D. Nosbaum |
75,750 | 76,873 | | | 2,567 | 155,190 | |||||||||||||
Joseph D. Rupp |
87,500 | 76,873 | | | 3,255 | 167,628 | |||||||||||||
Curtis M. Stevens |
76,250 | 76,873 | | | 4,674 | 157,797 |
The following table shows the grant date fair value of restricted stock units and option grants made during fiscal year 2017 as well as the aggregate number of restricted stock units and stock option awards outstanding for each non-employee director as of October 31, 2017:
|
Restricted Stock Units | Stock Options | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2017 Grants | |
2017 Grants | |
||||||||||||||
|
Total Units Outstanding as of October 31, 2017 (#) |
Total Stock Options Outstanding as of October 31, 2017 (#) |
||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Grant Date | Grant Date Fair Value ($) |
Grant Date | Grant Date Fair Value ($) |
||||||||||||||
Buck |
11/1/16 | 76,873 | 12,935 | n/a | | 20,876 | ||||||||||||
Davis |
11/1/16 | 76,873 | 20,346 | n/a | | 56,308 | ||||||||||||
Nosbaum |
11/1/16 | 76,873 | 16,046 | n/a | | 35,398 | ||||||||||||
Rupp |
11/1/16 | 76,873 | 20,346 | n/a | | 56,308 | ||||||||||||
Stevens |
11/1/16 | 76,873 | 16,046 | n/a | | 35,398 |
13
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This section of the proxy describes the compensation paid to the executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 37 of this Proxy Statement:
The compensation programs described, however, apply more broadly to other officers and management personnel at the Company, with changes as appropriate to reflect different levels and types of responsibility. The Company believes that this approach helps to align Quanex employees into a unified team committed to the Company's corporate objectives.
Business and Compensation Context
Strategic Repositioning and Fiscal 2017 Performance
Beginning in 2013, the Company embarked on a transformative strategy that began with the hiring of William Griffiths as CEO. Under Mr. Griffith's leadership, and with ongoing oversight from our Board of Directors, the Company's executive team began implementing a strategic transformation plan to improve profitability, increase free cash flow, and adjust the Company's portfolio of businesses and products to drive long-term shareholder value. These strategic actions included:
These strategic initiatives, including the decision to become a "pure play" building products company, further added to our EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, and free cash flow and reinforced our strategy of value driven business units.
In fiscal 2017, we consciously exited over $80 million in revenue. These reduced volumes, in combination with operational inefficiencies, dampened profitability and resulted in underperformance on key financial goals. Despite this initial decline, cash flow continued to be strong and allowed us to reduce debt (net of capital leases) by over $45 million for the second consecutive year. Additionally, Total Shareholder Return for the year was 36%. Managing cost structure, maintaining a strong balance sheet, and providing meaningful returns to our shareholders are important elements of our strategy. The actions taken in 2017 are intended to position Quanex to further improve its profitability and cash flow in 2018.
The following graphs illustrate critical scope and financial metrics over the prior four-year period. They are presented on a pro forma basis to include the results of Nichols Aluminum (excluding a one-time gain on the sale of Nichols) to provide an understanding of the Company's execution on its strategic goals.
14
Despite Falling Short on Targets in Fiscal 2017, the Strategic Actions taken Reflect our Focus on Investment for the Long Term.
Pro Forma Revenue and Pro Forma EBITDA Margin Performance |
Pro Forma EBITDA, Free Cash Flow, and Pro Forma EBITDA Margin Performance |
|
While revenue in fiscal 2017 ended below desired levels, EBITDA margin performance remained strong. | In combination with the decision to retire or redeploy assets in fiscal 2017, improvements in EBITDA and free cash flow fell short of Management's goals. |
Financial Metric(1)
|
Fiscal 2014(2) | Fiscal 2015(3) | Fiscal 2016 | Fiscal 2017 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue ($M) |
$ | 733 | $ | 646 | $ | 928 | $ | 867 | |||||
Pro Forma EBITDA ($M) |
$ | 47 | $ | 61 | $ | 103 | $ | 96 | |||||
Pro Forma EBITDA Margin |
6.4 | % | 9.4 | % | 11.1 | % | 11.1 | % | |||||
Free Cash Flow ($M) |
$ | (13 | ) | $ | 37 | $ | 49 | $ | 44 |
Despite underperformance on key financial metrics in 2017, since 2014, EBITDA has more than doubled (from $47 million to $96 million), and Free Cash Flow has grown significantly (from $(13) million to $44 million).
Realized Pay and Shareholder Alignment
The effect of the strategic repositioning has meaningfully reduced realized pay for our executives during this time frame. The following chart illustrates the relationship between the CEO's target and realized pay to the Company's total shareholder return between fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2017.
15
Note: Target pay includes base salary; target bonus; and the grant date value of options, restricted stock, cash-based performance units, and performance shares for the applicable period. Realized pay includes base salary, bonus payout, in-the-money value of stock options based on the October 31, 2017 stock price, the value of restricted stock granted during the period based on the October 31, 2017 stock price, and the value of cash-based performance units and performance shares paid out during the period. Revenue reflects the Company's fiscal year end revenue for each applicable year. Fiscal 2014 Revenue includes $137 million attributable to Nichols Aluminum.
The following table shows the payouts (as a percentage of target) for the Company's annual incentive award program ("AIA") and performance awards under the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan. Over the past five years, incentive plan payouts have been responsive to Company performanceon average, payouts under the AIA and long-term performance award have been approximately 51% of target and 42% of target, respectively.
|
Payout (as a % of target) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Award Type
|
FY2013 | FY2014 | FY2015 | FY2016 | FY2017 | |||||||||||
AIA |
0.0 | % | 78.5 | % | 92.8 | % | 81.4 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||
Perf. Award |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 66.8 | % | 100.0 | % | 41.0 | % |
In fiscal 2017, we did not earn a payout under the AIA and earned below target on the long-term performance award, consistent with our performance on goals during the year. Mr. Wilson earned a pro rata payout related to his prior service as a division president.
Responding to Shareholders: Changes for 2018
In line with our commitment to align pay and performance, we undertook careful analysis of the value drivers of our business in relation to our compensation arrangements. As a result, decisions were made to change our compensation programs for fiscal 2018. The Committee believes that the decisions
16
made to our program going forward demonstrate our ongoing commitment to align executive compensation with stockholder interests and encourage value creation at Quanex. Although these changes are discussed here, the full impact of these decisions will be reflected in 2018 pay and in next year's proxy statement. These recent changes include the following:
We use traditional compensation elements of base salary, annual incentives, long-term incentives, and employee benefits to deliver attractive and competitive compensation. We benchmark both compensation and Company performance in evaluating the appropriateness of pay. All of our executive pay programs are administered by an independent compensation committee, with assistance from an independent consultant. Some highlights to our executive compensation program include the following actions:
What We Do | What We Don't Do | |
---|---|---|
✓ Link annual incentive compensation to the achievement of an objective pre-established performance goal. ✓ Provide 50% of our long-term compensation in the form of Performance-Based Long-Term Incentives. ✓ Target the market median for all elements of compensation. ✓ Apply robust minimum stock ownership guidelines. ✓ Maintain a clawback policy. ✓ Use and review compensation tally sheets. ✓ Evaluate the risk of our compensation programs. ✓ Use an independent compensation consultant. ✓ Seek to optimize deductibility of performance-based compensation. |
✗ No tax gross ups for new executive officers. ✗ We do not allow hedging or pledging of Company stock. ✗ No "single-trigger" change in control cash payments. ✗ No excessive perquisites. |
We design our executive compensation program to further our corporate goal of paying for performance. Our compensation plan and pay strategy focus on and are intended to influence the
17
profit margins of our businesses, cash flow generation, returns to stockholders and efficient management of our operations.
Our specific objectives and related plan features include:
Objectives | How We Meet Our Objectives | |
---|---|---|
Attract and retain effective leadership | We provide a competitive
total pay package, taking into account base salary, incentives, benefits, and perquisites for each executive. We regularly benchmark our pay programs against the competitive market, comparing both fixed and variable, at-risk compensation that is tied to short- and
long-term performance; we use the results of this analysis as context in making pay adjustments. Our plans include
three-year performance cycles on long-term incentive awards, three-year vesting schedules on equity incentives, and career-weighted vesting on our supplemental retirement plan to motivate long-term retention. We compete effectively for the highest caliber people who will determine our long-term success. |
|
Motivate and reward executives for achieving specific financial goals |
We offer a compensation
program that focuses on variable, performance-based compensation (through Annual and Long-Term Incentive Awards). Specific financial performance measures used in the incentive programs include: Fiscal 2017 Annual Incentive Awards (AIA) used a corporate scorecard
based on 100% Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization and other, net (EBITDA), taking into account operational and strategic goals, provided the Company achieves the initial performance hurdle of positive operating income
(excluding any amounts attributable to corporate). Fiscal 2018 AIA replaces EBITDA with Modified Free Cash Flow. Performance Share awards use compounded Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth to motivate long-term focus on bottom-line performance, Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) to reward executives for performance compared to the market, and Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) to encourage effective capital deployment. |
|
Create a strong financial incentive to meet or exceed long-term financial goals and build long-term value |
We link a significant
part of total compensation to Quanex's financial and stock price performanceover 70% of our compensation mix is performance-based. We deliver 50% of
long-term incentives in the form of performance-based equity compensation. For SVPs and above, long-term compensation opportunities are weighted to deliver more than two times the target short-term incentive opportunity, resulting in a significant portion of our total compensation delivered in the form of long-term incentives. |
18
Objectives | How We Meet Our Objectives | |
---|---|---|
Align executive and shareholder interests |
In order to emphasize
long-term shareholder returns, we require significant Quanex stock ownership among executives through the use of stock ownership guidelines. The ultimate value of our annual equity grants is driven by stock price performance over the grant date value. |
Fiscal 2017
The Compensation Committee annually examines the level of competitiveness and continued appropriateness of our executive compensation program. For fiscal 2017, the Company examined the previous comparator group for benchmarking compensation and determined to transition from a reference group approach to a peer group approach comprised of the Company's direct industry peers. For fiscal 2017, Quanex used comparative compensation data from a group of sixteen direct industry companies, referred to in this CD&A as the "Peer Group," as a point of reference in designing and setting its compensation levels. The Peer Group consists of companies selected on criteria including size, complexity, revenue, market capitalization, risk profile, asset intensity, margins, and industrial application of the primary business. The Compensation Committee reviewed and approved the following companies to be included in the Company's fiscal 2017 peer group:
AAON Inc. American Woodmark Corp. Apogee Enterprises Inc. Continental Building Products Gibraltar Industries Inc. Griffon Corporation |
LCI Industries (formerly known as Drew Industries, Inc.) Louisiana-Pacific Corp. Masonite International NCI Building Systems Inc. Patrick Industries Inc. |
PGT, Inc. Ply Gem Holdings Inc. Simpson Manufacturing Inc. Trex Company, Inc. Universal Forest Products Inc. |
The following 18 companies were included in the fiscal 2016 Reference Group but removed from the fiscal 2017 Peer Group: A.M. Castle & Co., Actuant Corp., Albany International Corp., Astec Industries Inc., Builders FirstSource Inc., CLARCOR Inc., Compass Minerals International Inc., Eagle Materials Inc., Encore Wire Corp., EnPro Industries Inc., Graco Inc., H&E Equipment Services Inc., Headwaters Inc., Nordson Corp., Nortek Inc., Olympic Steel Inc., Superior Industries International, and Watts Water Technologies Inc.
Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. ("FW Cook"), an independent compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee, used the Peer Group pay information, along with manufacturing and general industry survey data, to develop the appropriate range of compensation for each executive position. FW Cook also prepared an independent analysis of our key performance indicators such as profitability, growth, capital efficiency, balance sheet strength, and total return to stockholders compared to our sixteen industry peers. These results were then reported to the Compensation Committee in order to provide a thorough picture of the competitiveness of pay in the context of our performance as compared with that of our peers. While the Compensation Committee uses this analysis to help frame its decisions on compensation, it uses its collective judgment in determining executive pay. The Compensation Committee exercises discretion in making compensation decisions based on the following inputs: its understanding of market conditions, its understanding of competitive pay analysis, recommendations from the CEO regarding his direct reports, the Committee's overall evaluation of the executive's performance, and our overall compensation strategy.
19
Changes for Fiscal 2018
For fiscal 2018, the Company added one company, Insteel Industries, to the peer group. The following seventeen companies comprise the fiscal 2018 peer group:
AAON Inc. American Woodmark Corp. Apogee Enterprises Inc. Continental Building Products Gibraltar Industries Inc. Griffon Corporation |
Insteel Industries LCI Industries Louisiana-Pacific Corp. Masonite International NCI Building Systems Inc. Patrick Industries Inc. |
PGT, Inc. Ply Gem Holdings Inc. Simpson Manufacturing Inc. Trex Company, Inc. Universal Forest Products Inc. |
Our executive compensation program is a traditional design structure that has been customized to suit the business and organizational objectives of the Company. It includes base salary, annual cash incentive compensation, long-term incentives and executive benefits. Our fiscal 2017 long-term incentive program consisted of stock option grants, restricted stock grants, and performance share awards. The amount of pay that is performance-based for an executive is directly related to the level of responsibility held by the position; accordingly, our highest ranked executive has the most performance-based pay as a percentage of total compensation. We attempt to set realistic but challenging goals in our annual incentive and performance share plans. In both cases, if we fail to meet the pre-determined standards, no plan-based compensation is earned by executives.
We evaluate the various components of compensation annually relative to the competitive market for prevalence and value. By setting each of the elements against the competitive market within the parameters of our compensation strategy, the relative weighting of each element of our total pay mix varies by individual. We do not set fixed percentages for each element of compensation. The mix may also change over time as the competitive market moves or other market conditions which affect us change. We do not have and do not anticipate establishing any policies for allocating between long-term and currently paid compensation, or between cash and non-cash compensation. We have a process of assessing the appropriate allocation between these elements of compensation on a periodic basis and adjusting our position based on market conditions and our business strategy.
Base Salary
Purpose: This pay element is intended to compensate executives for their qualifications and the value of their job in the competitive market.
Competitive Positioning: The Company's goal is to target the market median as our strategic target for base salary. We review each executive's salary and performance every year to determine whether base salary should be adjusted. Along with individual performance, we also consider movement of salary in the market, as well as our financial results from the prior year to determine appropriate salary adjustments.
While the Compensation Committee applies general compensation concepts when determining the competitiveness of our executives' salaries, the Compensation Committee generally considers base salaries as being competitive when they are within approximately 10% of the stated market target (in this case, the market 50th percentile). In the most recent analysis using both our comparator group and general industry data, the salaries for our named executive officers ranged from 82% to 107% of the market 50th percentile.
Fiscal 2017 Review: In December 2016, the Compensation Committee decided to maintain current base salaries based on the Company's relative position to the market and overall stockholder return.
20
Mr. Wilson's base salary was determined in connection with his promotion to COO in August 2017. The table below provides base salaries for fiscals 2016 and 2017:
Name and Principal Position
|
Fiscal 2016 Base Salary |
Fiscal 2017 Base Salary |
Base Salary Increase |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
William C. Griffiths |
$ | 815,000 | $ | 815,000 | 0 | % | ||||
George L. Wilson(1) |
$ |
327,000 |
$ |
450,000 |
38 |
% |
||||
Brent L. Korb |
$ |
418,000 |
$ |
418,000 |
0 |
% |
||||
Kevin P. Delaney |
$ |
375,000 |
$ |
375,000 |
0 |
% |
||||
M. Dewayne Williams |
$ |
232,000 |
$ |
232,000 |
0 |
% |
Changes for Fiscal 2018: In October 2017, the Compensation Committee decided to maintain current base salaries, as set forth above, based on the Company's relative position to market.
Annual Incentive Awards (AIA)
Purpose: This element of compensation is intended to reward executives for the achievement of annual goals related to key business drivers. It is also intended to emphasize to executives the key business goals of the Company from year to year.
Competitive Positioning: The Company's strategy is to target the market median for annual incentives for performance that meets expected levels. We have established the range of possible payouts under the plan so that our competitive position could be above or below our stated strategy based on performance outcomes. Our most recent analysis showed our named executive officers to be in a range of 81% to 108% of the market median on target total cash compensation.
Plan Mechanics: The Company's 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended in 2011 and 2014 (the "Omnibus Plan") serves as the governing plan document for our AIA. The AIA is a goal attainment incentive plan design that pays target award levels for expected performance results.
Fiscal 2017: The AIA emphasizes earnings and informed decision making with regard to the Company's operational and strategic goals. To integrate the goals of the AIA throughout the Company, the annual incentive program participation includes the top leaders of all of our domestic business divisions. We believe this is necessary in order to align managers throughout the organization with this incentive structure. The plan design requires the Company (excluding any amounts attributable to corporate) to have positive operating income in order for any Annual Incentive Awards to be paid out. If the performance hurdle is met, then the bonus pool for all Annual Incentive Awards is funded at the maximum bonus opportunity level.
Rigorous Goals: If funded, the Compensation Committee will assess performance against the fiscal 2017 corporate scorecard weighted 100% on EBITDA. The Company set rigorous performance expectations based on the forecasted results of the operating divisions and the projected markets for
21
building products. The Committee established performance goals for fiscal 2017 that require the Company to at least perform at last year's levels to earn a payout.
Target Award Levels: Based on competitive market practices for annual incentives, and our compensation strategy, we set a target award opportunity for each of our executives. This is the amount of incentive compensation the executive can earn when performance meets expected results, or "target." The table below reflects the payout percentage of a named executive's base salary at the threshold, target and maximum levels of performance for fiscal 2017.
Potential AIA Payout
Expressed as a % of Salary
Participant
|
Threshold | Target | Maximum | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEO |
50 | % | 100 | % | 200 | % | ||||
COO |
37.5 | % | 75 | % | 150 | % | ||||
CFO |
32.5 | % | 65 | % | 130 | % | ||||
GC |
30 | % | 60 | % | 120 | % | ||||
VP-Controller |
25 | % | 50 | % | 100 | % |
Fiscal 2017 Results: For fiscal 2017, the performance hurdle of positive operating income (excluding corporate) was met, with the Company having earned operating income of $34.4 million. Once the hurdle was met and the plan was funded, the Compensation Committee determined the incentive payouts. The primary metric for the AIA scorecard considered by the Compensation Committee was the Adjusted EBITDA target of $111.8 million. The Committee adjusted EBITDA results by factoring in the effect of foreign exchange rates, LIFO, stock based compensation, restructuring related costs, loss on sale, and transaction related costs. The Company achieved adjusted EBITDA of $98.5 million, which resulted in an AIA achievement of 0% of target payment for the officers. Mr. Wilson earned a payout equal to 81% of target, based on his role as Division President of IG Systems for the first nine months of the fiscal year, and a 0% of target payout based on his role as COO for the last three months of the fiscal year. The AIA achievement resulted in payments to participants as follows:
Participant
|
Target % (as a % of salary) |
Achieved % (as a % of salary) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEO |
100 | % | 0 | % | |||
COO |
60 | % | 30 | % | |||
CFO |
65 | % | 0 | % | |||
GC |
60 | % | 0 | % | |||
VP-Controller |
50 | % | 0 | % |
Fiscal 2018 Changes: For fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee replaced the EBITDA metric in the AIA with Modified Free Cash Flow. Modified Free Cash Flow is defined as EBITDA minus change in accounts receivable, inventory, and accounts payable minus capital expenditures.
The fiscal 2018 scorecard will be weighted 100% on Modified Free Cash Flow. We believe that the use of a single financial measure helps focus the management team on operational excellence and profitability. The plan will continue to use positive operating income (excluding any amounts attributable to corporate) as the initial performance hurdle.
AIA participant target payout percentages will remain the same for fiscal 2018.
22
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Purpose: We have a long-term incentive program designed to help align the interests of executive management with shareholders and reward executives for the achievement of long-term goals. Long-term incentives are also critical to the retention of key employees and provide executives an opportunity for personal capital accumulation. For these reasons we have placed more value on the long-term incentive element of compensation than on other elements. The result is that this element of compensation represents at least half of the named executive officers' total direct compensation.
Competitive Positioning: In 2016, we evaluated the long-term incentive philosophy and made modifications in order to target the 50th percentile of the market. In our most recent analysis versus the market, we found that the named executive officers' competitive positioning is within approximately 10% of the market 50th percentile. The individual performance of each named executive officer is not considered in the value of the long-term incentive awards granted. Since the goals are set prospectively, the Company's financial performance determines the ultimate value of the award.
Participation: Participation in the program includes the named executive officers and certain key contributors to the business and is determined based on competitive practices as well as our assessment of which positions contribute to long-term value creation.
Target Award Levels: In order to align with our market strategy of targeting the 50th percentile, we have maintained the dollar value of target awards for the CEO, CFO, and GC. Target awards for our VPs are determined based on a percent of salary. The following LTI targets were established for the executives for fiscal 2017:
Participant
|
LTI Target | |
---|---|---|
CEO |
$2,145,000 | |
VPCOO |
200% of base salary | |
CFO |
$700,000 | |
GC |
$594,000 | |
VPController |
70% of base salary |
Fiscal Year 2017 Long Term Incentive Program Design
Vehicles and Goals
The Company's fiscal 2017 program consisted of a combination of stock options, performance shares and restricted stock. The allocation between the long-term incentive vehicles is determined by the Compensation Committee based on market information provided by its compensation consultant, as well as input from senior management regarding the key business drivers that allow for the continuation of a results-oriented culture. The Omnibus Plan does not provide for any specific subjective individual performance component in determining the ultimate value of the award. The following chart illustrates the fiscal 2017 allocation of long-term incentives by vehicle type.
23
Stock Options
Options to purchase company stock comprised 25% of our long-term incentive target value for fiscal 2017 and provide executives the opportunity to share in the increase in stock value over time. They provide an element of compensation that varies along with changes in stock price over time. These awards also offer our executives the opportunity to accumulate value (if the Company's stock appreciates) since the growth in value occurs over a long period of time (up to 10 years), and gains from that growth are not taxed until such time as the options are exercised. Since we generally use ratable vesting over three years for each award, stock options also serve a meaningful role in the retention of our key employees.
Our stock options are granted at the fair market value closing price on the date of grant, have a term of ten years, and generally vest ratably over a three-year period.
Restricted Stock
Restricted stock represents 25% of the participant's long-term incentive value. We chose 25% of the total value because it provides meaningful retentive value to our key executives, helps smooth out market volatility, and is cost efficient. The restricted stock awards vest three years after the award is granted, so long as the participant remains employed by us. We believe restricted stock awards are an effective long-term compensation vehicle through which key employees can be retained, especially through volatile periods in the market.
Performance Shares
Performance shares represent 50% of each participant's long-term incentive value. Performance shares are payable 50% in cash and 50% in stock and are intended to motivate executives to achieve preset goals that are in line with critical business drivers. These awards also provide an incentive for executives to outperform peer companies as measured by relative total shareholder return.
We set target award values for each year. These target award values are used to calculate the number of performance shares granted to each executive. The final number of shares to vest is not determined until the end of a three-year performance cycle and is based on Earnings Per Share Growth (or "EPS Growth") and Relative Total Shareholder Return (or "Relative TSR"). Each goal is weighted 50% of the total performance share award. As part of our emphasis on performance-based long-term
24
incentives, new for 2017, the payouts under these metrics are subject to a modifier based on Return on Invested Capital ("ROIC") improvement.
EPS Growth is measured as the cumulative value of EPS over the three-year performance period, Relative TSR is expressed as the stock price appreciation plus dividends reinvested relative to appreciation of our peer group, and ROIC performance is measured as the Company's absolute improvement over the three-year performance period. ROIC is defined as net operating profit after taxes divided by average invested capital. Net operating profit after taxes is defined as earnings from continuing operations plus after-tax interest and amortization expense. Average invested capital is defined as the sum of the average debt and shareholders' equity for the year. ROIC excludes other comprehensive loss, goodwill impairments and non-economic accounting changes, as they are not reflective of our operating performance. Modifier payouts can range from 0% to 50% of target, but no modifier will be applied if the Company does not reach at least threshold performance on the EPS Growth and Relative TSR metrics. Performance shares will continue to be capped at 200% of target. The goals for EPS Growth and Relative TSR are listed below:
|
|
|
Performance Share Modifier | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3-Yr. Cumulative Compounded Annual EPS Growth % |
||||||||||||||
Milestones
|
Relative Total Shareholder Return Percentile |
R-TSR (50% Weighting) |
EPS (50% Weighting) |
Total | ||||||||||||
Maximum |
75 | % | 12 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 200 | % | ||||||
Target |
60 | % | 9 | % | 50 | % | 50 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Threshold |
30 | % | 6 | % | 37.5 | % | 37.5 | % | 75 | % |
To measure performance for the fiscal 2017 grant, the three-year cumulative compounded EPS growth will be applied to the starting value of $0.80 per share, which was derived from historical EPS, adjusted for the pro forma results of businesses acquired, restructuring and goodwill impairment charges, less certain transaction costs.
Fiscal 2017 Long-Term Incentive Grants
The number of long-term incentive awards granted during fiscal 2017 was determined by: (1) taking 25% of the participant's target award value and dividing it by the calculated Black-Scholes value of a Quanex stock option to determine the number of options, (2) taking 25% of the participant's target award value and dividing it by the 10-day average closing stock price between October 18, 2016 and October 31, 2016 to determine the number of restricted stock awards and (3) taking 50% of the participant's target award value and dividing it by the 10-day average closing stock price between October 18, 2016 and October 31, 2016 to determine the number of performance shares. The equity grant calculations apply an average stock price based on the last 10 trading days in October 2016. For more information related to long-term incentive awards granted during fiscal 2017, please see the table entitled "Grants of Plan Based Awards" located on page 40 of this Proxy Statement.
Previously Awarded Performance Shares
Fiscal 2015 Performance Shares
The performance shares awarded to our executives in December 2014 (the "Fiscal 2015 Performance Shares") became payable to executives in December 2017, with a final value determined by the Company's performance period for fiscal 2015 through fiscal 2017. Performance measures and goals for the Fiscal 2015 Performance Shares included EPS Growth and Relative TSR, each weighted 50% of the total performance share award. EPS Growth is measured as the cumulative value of EPS over the three-year performance period, and Relative TSR is expressed as the stock price appreciation plus dividends reinvested relative to appreciation of our peer group. Relative TSR is determined by calculating the change in the value of our stock plus the value of dividends and comparing that value
25
with that of our peer group. Our performance against these pre-established goals determined the payout to executives within a range from threshold to maximum. The pre-established goals and the actual performance to these goals are set forth below.
|
|
3 yr. EPS Growth(1) |
Performance Share Modifier | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Relative TSR Percentile |
R-TSR (50% weighting) |
EPS (50% weighting) |
|
|||||||||||||||
Milestones
|
Cum. | Percent | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Performance Measures: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Maximum |
75 | % | $ | 0.83 | 12 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 200 | % | |||||||
Target |
60 | % | $ | 0.79 | 9 | % | 50 | % | 50 | % | 100 | % | |||||||
Threshold |
30 | % | $ | 0.74 | 6 | % | 37.5 | % | 37.5 | % | 75 | % | |||||||
Actual Performance |
0 | % | $ | 0.75 | 6.7 | % | 0 | % | 41 | % | 41 | % |
For the Fiscal 2015 Performance Shares, the total actual payout was equal to 41% of target as a result of earning 82% of target associated with EPS Growth and 0% of target associated with relative TSR. Actual payout amounts for each named executive officer were as follows:
Officer
|
Fiscal 2015 Performance Shares Granted (#) |
EPS Growth Total Payout ($) |
EPS Growth Total Shares Granted (#) |
R-TSR Total Payout ($) |
R-TSR Total Shares Granted (#) |
Cash Paid for Accumulated Dividends during Performance Period ($) |
Total Payout ($) |
Total Shares Granted (#) |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Griffiths |
53,600 | 243,494 | 10,988 | | | 10,549 | 254,043 | 10,988 | |||||||||||||||||
Wilson |
7,000 | 31,800 | 1,435 | | | 1,377 | 33,177 | 1,435 | |||||||||||||||||
Korb |
17,500 | 79,499 | 3,588 | | | 3,444 | 82,943 | 3,588 | |||||||||||||||||
Delaney |
14,800 | 67,233 | 3,034 | | | 2,913 | 70,146 | 3,034 | |||||||||||||||||
Williams |
3,900 | 17,717 | 800 | | | 767 | 18,484 | 800 |
Fiscal 2018 Long-Term Incentive Grants
At the Compensation Committee's December 2017 meeting, the Compensation Committee elected to change the Company's LTI plan design from an LTI mix of 25% stock options, 25% restricted stock and 50% performance shares to 25% performance restricted stock units, 25% restricted stock and 50% performance shares. The new LTI design will be 75% performance-based. Other than the replacement of stock options with performance restricted stock units, the design of the LTI plan is the same as in fiscal 2017. The following charts illustrate the change in the allocation of long-term incentives by vehicle type for fiscal 2018.
26
Fiscal 2018 Performance Restricted Stock Units
The fiscal 2018 performance restricted stock units (PRSU) can be earned based on absolute total shareholder return over the three-year performance period. The PRSUs will be settled 100% in equity. In order for executives to receive a target payout, the Company must have absolute TSR improvement of 20%. The table below illustrates the number of shares that will vest based on the Company's absolute TSR under the PRSU awards. Performance will be interpolated for any results in between threshold and target or target and maximum.
Milestones
|
Absolute Total Shareholder Return Performance |
Performance Restricted Stock Units Modifier |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maximum |
³ 50 | % | 150 | % | |||
Target |
20 | % | 100 | % | |||
Threshold |
20 | % | 50 | % |
Fiscal 2018 Performance Shares
The fiscal 2018 performance shares will continue to include EPS Growth and Relative TSR, each weighted 50%, with a modifier based on absolute ROIC improvement. Modifier payouts can range from 0% to 50% of target, but no modifier will be applied if the Company does not reach at least threshold performance on the EPS Growth and Relative TSR metrics. Performance shares will continue to be capped at 200% of target.
|
|
|
Performance Share Modifier | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3-Yr. Cumulative Compounded Annual EPS Growth % |
||||||||||||||
Milestones
|
Relative Total Shareholder Return Percentile |
R-TSR (50% Weighting) |
EPS (50% Weighting) |
Total | ||||||||||||
Maximum |
75 | % | 12 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 200 | % | ||||||
Target |
60 | % | 9 | % | 50 | % | 50 | % | 100 | % | ||||||
Threshold |
30 | % | 6 | % | 37.5 | % | 37.5 | % | 75 | % |
For fiscal 2018, the three-year cumulative compounded EPS growth will be applied to the starting value of $0.58 per share, which is the pro forma EPS for fiscal 2017, excluding transaction costs.
The foregoing goals are not intended to and do not reflect guidance by or expectations of the Company as to actual results. These goals are part of an overall compensation program designed,
27
among other things, to align executive compensation with the market's reasonable expectations of performance and shareholder returns.
LTI Targets
For fiscal 2018, we will continue to target the market median for long-term incentives. Our review of market conditions for fiscal 2018 indicated no change to target LTI values as compared to last year with the exception of the VP Controller. The Committee chose to raise the LTI value for the VP Controller to $175,000. In addition to holding target LTI values flat, we have maintained the dollar value of target awards for the VPs. This practice has been used for the CEO, CFO, and GC since fiscal 2016. The following table shows the LTI targets for the executives.
Participant
|
LTI Target | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
CEO |
$ | 2,145,000 | ||
VPCOO |
$ | 900,000 | ||
CFO |
$ | 700,000 | ||
GC |
$ | 594,000 | ||
VPController |
$ | 175,000 |
Processes and Procedures for Determining Executive Compensation
Guided by the principal objectives described above, the Compensation Committee approves the structure of the executive compensation program and administers the programs for our executive officers, including matters where approval by our independent Compensation Committee members is appropriate for tax or regulatory reasons. The following describes the roles of key participants in the process.
The Role of Executives
Our Chief Executive Officer is the only executive who works with the Compensation Committee and compensation consultant in establishing compensation levels and performance targets. Our Chief Executive Officer is responsible for reviewing the compensation and performance of the other executive officers and, as such, makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding adjustments in compensation to such executive officers. The Compensation Committee considers the Chief Executive Officer's recommendations along with the Committee's own evaluation of individual and business performance and the market data provided by its compensation consultant. In making recommendations, the Chief Executive Officer relies upon his evaluation of his direct reports' performance and competitive compensation information. The Chief Executive Officer does not recommend his own compensation. The Chief Executive Officer recommends AIA performance goals to the Compensation Committee. The Chief Executive Officer, with input from the compensation consultant, recommends performance goals for long-term incentive awards that are properly aligned with the business goals and compensation strategy.
Our Senior Vice PresidentGeneral Counsel and Secretary serves as the liaison between the compensation consultant, the Compensation Committee, and the Governance Committee. In this role, he interfaces with the compensation consultant to carry out the duties of the Compensation Committee and Governance Committee.
The Role of Independent External Advisors
To facilitate the formulation and administration of our compensation program, the Compensation Committee has retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. ("FW Cook") since July 2012 as its independent consultant on executive compensation matters. FW Cook helps the Compensation Committee assess the
28
competitiveness and appropriateness of compensation programs throughout the market, including our peers, and develop a compensation program that is consistent with our objectives and market conditions. FW Cook meets with our Compensation Committee in executive sessions and advises the Compensation Committee with respect to a wide range of issues related to executive compensation. The Compensation Committee authorizes the scope of services that it desires FW Cook to provide for the Company, including reviewing and analyzing market data, evaluating our comparator group composition, making recommendations for incentive system designs, providing market and regulatory updates, assisting with deliberations related to CEO compensation, reviewing any relevant information and reporting to the Compensation Committee on all aspects of our compensation programs. FW Cook reports directly to, and takes its charge from, the Compensation Committee. However, the Compensation Committee does not specifically direct the manner in which FW Cook performs the scope of services it provides to the Company. Additionally, the Compensation Committee makes all final decisions regarding compensation.
Independence of Advisors
The Compensation Committee reviewed the independence of FW Cook based on the NYSE rules for independence which include the following factors: (i) the provision of other services to the Company by FW Cook; (ii) the amount of fees from the Company paid to FW Cook as a percentage of FW Cook's total revenue; (iii) the policies and procedures of FW Cook that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest; (iv) any business or personal relationship of the individual compensation advisors who serve the Committee with any member of the Committee; (v) any stock of the Company owned by such individual compensation advisors, and (vi) any business or personal relationship of FW Cook or the individual compensation advisors who serve the Committee with an executive officer of the Company. The Compensation Committee also reviewed FW Cook's policies for avoiding conflicts of interest. The Compensation Committee has determined, based on its analysis of the factors listed above, that the work of FW Cook and the individual compensation consultants employed by FW Cook does not create any conflicts of interest and that FW Cook meets the NYSE standards for independence.
The Role of the Compensation & Management Development Committee
The Compensation Committee currently comprises three non-employee independent directors. The Compensation Committee's duties in administering executive compensation programs include the following:
The Compensation Committee determines the Chief Executive Officer's salary and incentive awards based upon an assessment of individual and Company performance, as well as market data provided by the compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee may form and delegate duties to subcommittees when appropriate. A more expansive list of the Compensation Committee's responsibilities can be found in its charter, which can be viewed on our website at www.quanex.com.
29
Post-Employment Compensation
Severance and change in control benefits are provided under the employment agreements of our executives, as well as under our incentive plans. These benefits are discussed at greater length in the section entitled "Employment Agreements and Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control" on page 31 of this Proxy Statement.
Since 2013, the Company has maintained a policy to no longer provide excise tax gross up benefits to any new executives in the event of a change in control termination.
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company has a nonqualified deferred compensation program that gives executives the opportunity to defer income. As with our various other plans and programs, this deferral opportunity is designed to attract and retain key executives.
The deferred compensation program is administered by the Compensation Committee. Before eligible employees can participate, they must first receive a recommendation from our senior managers and then final approval by the Compensation Committee. Participants in the program may choose to defer up to 100% of their annual and long-term incentive bonuses. Participants may choose from a variety of investment choices in which the Company will invest their deferrals over the defined deferral period.
Executive Benefits
Purpose: The role of executive benefits is to provide financial security, enhanced employee welfare, and competitive packages that are meaningful in the markets for which we compete for executive talent. These programs provide post retirement income, and in some cases, additional benefits in place of those that would otherwise be lost due to plan limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.
Competitive Positioning: Our executive benefits strategy is to provide meaningful yet cost-efficient benefits to executives at a level that aligns with our desired competitive positioning of the market median. We provide executives with health and welfare benefits that are consistent with our program for exempt personnel generally. Supplemental retirement and supplemental life benefits are also provided to our officers.
Program Elements:
30
planning, automobile allowances, and club memberships. The Compensation Committee eliminated tax gross-up payments on perquisites, effective December 31, 2009.
Clawback Provision (Recovery of Incentive Payments)
We have a policy to enable the Board, in its judgment and to the extent permitted by governing law, to require reimbursement of any cash bonus or performance shares paid to an executive where (a) the value of the award was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a material restatement, and (b) a lower payment would have been made to the executive based on the restated financial results. In each instance, the Company may seek to recover that portion of the affected executive's annual and/or long-term incentive payments that is higher than the payment that would have originally been paid. No reimbursement will be required if such material restatement was caused by or resulted from any change in accounting policy or rules. In addition, we have amended our performance based award agreements to facilitate a transition to new SEC and stock exchange requirements when they are finalized.
Risk Assessment
In fiscal 2017, the Compensation Committee discussed and analyzed risks associated with the Company's compensation policies and practices for executive officers and all employees generally. This discussion included, but was not limited to, topics such as eligibility, affordability, retention impact, corporate objectives, alignment with shareholder interests, governance, and possible unintended consequences. The Compensation Committee did not identify any risks arising from the Company's compensation programs or practices that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines
We encourage our executives to own our Common Stock because we believe such ownership provides strong alignment of interests between executives and shareholders. Our executive stock ownership guidelines provide that different levels of executives are expected to own a specific value of our Common Stock, expressed as a percentage of salary. The stock ownership requirement for the current CEO is effective five years after assuming his role. For other executives, the stock ownership requirement is effective three years after assuming their respective roles. The chart below shows the guidelines by executive level.
Level
|
Typical Executive Position |
Stock Ownership Goal |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
CEO | 4x Base Salary | ||
2 |
COO | 2.5x Base Salary | ||
3 |
SVP | 2x Base Salary | ||
4 |
VP | 1x Base Salary |
All of our named executives currently are in compliance with the executive stock ownership guidelines.
31
Timing of Certain Committee Actions
The Compensation Committee schedules actions related to executive pay to coincide with its regularly scheduled Board meetings in October and December:
Executive Compensation Element
|
Action Item | |
---|---|---|
Base Salaries | Review and/or adjust based on market review |
|
Short-Term Incentives |
Determine year-end results and approve payouts |
|
|
Set goals for upcoming year |
|
Long-Term Incentives |
Determine performance results and approve long-term plan's payouts |
|
|
Set goals for long-term plan's next three-year performance cycle |
|
|
Determine and approve equity awards, including stock options and restricted stock awards |
Compensation decisions related to promotions or new hire awards are addressed on an individual basis, at the time the executive is promoted or first joins the Company.
Accounting Considerations and Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation
In designing compensation programs, we consider the effects that accounting and taxation may have on us, the named executive officers or other employees as a group. We account for compensation arrangements in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. All share based payments to employees are measured at fair value on the date of grant and recognized in the statement of operations as compensation expense over their requisite service periods.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that we may not deduct for federal income tax purposes compensation of more than $1,000,000 paid in any year to the Chief Executive Officer or any of the three other most highly compensated executive officers, excluding the Chief Financial Officer, unless the compensation is paid solely on the attainment of one or more pre-established objective performance goals and certain other considerations are met. Under the terms of our annual cash bonus program and performance unit and performance share programs, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, adjust payouts to executives downward. Because the plans are intended to comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m), no upward discretion in determining payouts is permitted.
Tax reform legislation that was enacted in December 2017 will be considered as the Committee administers compensation arrangements in the future.
Influence of Say on Pay Results on Executive Compensation Decisions
Management and the Compensation Committee are attentive to the outcome of the shareholder "Say on Pay" vote. At the Company's 2017 annual shareholder meeting, the Company received significant support for its executive compensation program, with 98.8% of the votes in favor of the "Say on Pay" resolution. The Compensation Committee remains responsive to shareholder feedback and believes that the strong support from shareholders indicates satisfaction with the executive compensation program.
32
Employment Agreements and Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
The Company has entered into change in control agreements with its named executive officers. We believe that the change in control agreements help us attract and retain our named executive officers by reducing the personal uncertainty and anxiety that arises from the possibility of a future business combination. During a potential change in control, we do not want executives leaving to pursue other employment out of concern for the security of their jobs or being unable to concentrate on their work. To enable executives to focus on the best interest of our stockholders, we offer change in control agreements that generally provide benefits to executives whose employment terminates in connection with a change in control.
In addition, to attract certain of our named executive officers to accept employment with us, we agreed to provide those officers who previously were employed by Quanex Corporation with severance agreements that will provide them certain of the protections they would have been entitled to if they had remained with Quanex Corporation following the spin-off of Quanex Building Products Corporation from Quanex Corporation in April 2008. The Company also entered into a letter agreement with its President and CEO, effective July 9, 2013, which contains certain executive severance provisions. The Company entered into these arrangements because executives at this level generally require a longer timeframe to find comparable jobs as fewer jobs at this level exist in the market. In addition, executives often have a large percentage of their personal wealth dependent on the status of their employer, given the requirement to hold a multiple of their salary in stock and the fact that a large part of their compensation is stock-based. The amount and type of benefits were based on competitive market practices for executives at this level.
Provisions of the severance agreements and severance letter arrangement require a termination of employment before any benefits are paid. The change in control agreements require both a change in control and a termination of employment before any benefits are paid (a "double trigger"). If an executive officer who is covered by both a change in control agreement and a severance agreement or letter arrangement experiences both a change in control of the Company and a termination of employment, benefits are payable under only the change in control agreement; in no event will the executive be able to receive payment under both the severance agreement or letter arrangement and the change in control agreement.
Severance Agreements of Certain Executives
This section describes the severance agreements entered into by Quanex with the SVPFinance and CFO and the SVPGeneral Counsel and Secretary. As described above, benefits are payable under the severance agreements following a termination of employment that meets certain requirements. A termination of employment that triggers benefits under the severance agreements includes involuntary termination by the Company without Cause. "Cause" exists if the executive commits gross negligence or willful misconduct in connection with his employment; an act of fraud, embezzlement or theft in connection with his employment; intentional wrongful damage to Company property; intentional wrongful disclosure of our secret processes or confidential information; or an act leading to a conviction of a felony or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude.
If the executive is entitled to benefits under the severance agreement, the executive will receive the following:
33
President and CEO Severance Letter Agreement
This section describes the severance provisions contained in the letter agreement entered into by the Company and Mr. Griffiths upon his assumption of duties as the Company's Chairman, President and CEO. In the event that Mr. Griffiths' employment is terminated by the Board of Directors for any reason other than "Cause," as defined in the change in control agreement, or a material violation of the Company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the following benefits would be payable:
The letter agreement requires Mr. Griffiths to execute a mutually satisfactory release of all claims before the expiration of the 90th day following his termination, or he shall forfeit any and all payment, reimbursements, and benefits due under the letter agreement.
Change in Control Agreements
As described above, benefits are payable under the change in control agreements following the occurrence of both (i) a change in control of the Company and (ii) termination of the named executive officer's employment with the Company. Each of the following events generally constitutes a change in control of the Company for purposes of the change in control agreements:
Terminations of employment that meet the termination requirement under the change in control agreements will be similar to but broader than those required under the severance agreements. For these purposes, a termination of employment would include a termination by the Company without
34
Cause as well as the executive's resignation for "Good Reason." "Good Reason" under the change in control agreements will include (but will not be limited to):
If the executive officer is entitled to benefits under a change in control agreement, the executive officer would receive the following:
35
If an executive officer is entitled to benefits under a change in control agreement, the following would occur immediately upon the occurrence of a change in control (regardless of whether the named executive officer's employment is terminated as a result of the change in control):
As set forth above, a named executive officer is entitled to benefits under either the severance agreement or the change in control agreement; under no circumstances can a named executive officer receive payment under both agreements.
36
Post-Employment Compensation Table
The following table describes the potential payments or benefits upon termination, other post-employment scenarios or change in control for each of the Company's named executive officers. The amounts in the table below show only the value of amounts payable or benefits due to enhancements in connection with each scenario, and do not reflect amounts otherwise payable or benefits otherwise due as a result of employment. In each case, the termination is assumed to take place on October 31, 2017.
Name
|
Severance Payment ($) |
Pro- rated Bonus ($) |
Options (Un- vested)(1)(10) ($) |
Restricted Stock (Un- vested)(1)(10) ($) |
Performance Shares(1) ($) |
Health & Welfare Benefits(2) ($) |
NQ Deferred Comp. (Unvested) ($) |
Retirement (SERP & Restoration)(3) ($) |
Tax Gross- Up(4) ($) |
Total Benefit ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
William C. Griffiths |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enhanced Retirement(5) |
| | | | 1,333,814 | (11) | | | | n/a | 1,333,814 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Death/Disability |
| | | 1,193,625 | 1,333,814 | (11) | | | | n/a | 2,527,440 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Involuntary w/o Cause(6) |
1,630,000 | | (9) | | | | 21,475 | | | n/a | 1,651,475 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Change in Control(7) |
| 815,000 | | 1,938,185 | 2,040,447 | | | | n/a | 4,793,632 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Termination after Change in Control(8) |
4,873,700 | 815,000 | | 1,938,185 | 2,040,447 | 49,151 | | | n/a | 9,716,482 | |||||||||||||||||||||
George L. Wilson |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enhanced Retirement(5) |
n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||
Death/Disability |
| 109,108 | 71,601 | 178,918 | 288,338 | (11) | | | | n/a | 647,966 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Involuntary w/o Cause(6) |
| | | | | | | | n/a | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change in Control(7) |
| 219,263 | 71,601 | 302,910 | 380,608 | | | | n/a | 974,382 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Termination after Change in Control(8) |
1,017,898 | (12) | 219,263 | 71,601 | 302,910 | 380,608 | 54,631 | | | n/a | 2,046,910 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Brent L. Korb |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enhanced Retirement(5) |
n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||
Death/Disability |
| | 141,327 | 387,836 | 596,418 | (11) | | | 2,953,493 | (13) | n/a | 4,079,073 | |||||||||||||||||||
Involuntary w/o Cause(6) |
627,000 | 271,700 | | | | 31,257 | | | n/a | 929,957 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change in Control(7) |
| 271,700 | 141,327 | 629,965 | 827,128 | | | | | 1,870,120 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Termination after Change in Control(8) |
2,069,100 | 271,700 | 141,327 | 629,965 | 827,128 | 73,474 | | 4,537,465 | 2,989,348 | 11,539,506 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Kevin P. Delaney |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enhanced Retirement(5) |
| | | | 368,818 | (11) | | | | n/a | 368,818 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Death/Disability |
| | | 329,731 | 368,818 | (11) | | | n/a | (14) | n/a | 698,549 | |||||||||||||||||||
Involuntary w/o Cause(6) |
562,500 | 225,000 | | | | 31,257 | | | n/a | 818,757 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change in Control(7) |
| 225,000 | | 535,580 | 563,933 | | | | | 1,324,513 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Termination after Change in Control(8) |
1,800,000 | 225,000 | | 535,580 | 563,933 | 79,328 | | 1,182,594 | 1,668,082 | 6,054,517 | |||||||||||||||||||||
M. Dewayne Williams |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Enhanced Retirement(5) |
n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||
Death/Disability |
| | 32,641 | 90,299 | 136,753 | (11) | | | | n/a | 259,693 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Involuntary w/o Cause(6) |
| | | | | | | | n/a | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change in Control(7) |
| 116,000 | 32,641 | 147,065 | 188,168 | | | | n/a | 483,873 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Termination after Change in Control(8) |
696,000 | 116,000 | 32,641 | 147,065 | 188,168 | 74,202 | | | n/a | 1,254,076 |
37
The following table provides information about the compensation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer, its Chief Financial Officer, and the three most highly compensated officers during the fiscal year ending October 31, 2017. George L. Wilson became Chief Operating Officer on August 1, 2017, and served as President of the Company's Insulating Glass Systems division since fiscal 2011. Amounts presented below for Mr. Wilson for fiscal 2017 include service in these capacities. No amounts are presented for Mr. Wilson for the periods prior to assuming an executive officer role.
Name/Principal Position
|
Year | Salary ($) |
Bonus ($) |
Stock Awards(1) ($) |
Option Awards(1) ($) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2) ($) |
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(3) ($) |
All Other Compensation(4) ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
William C. Griffiths |
2017 | 815,000 | | 1,398,744 | 569,905 | 254,043 | 109,202 | 41,907 | 3,188,801 | |||||||||||||||||||
Chairman of the Board, |
2016 | 813,654 | | 1,103,567 | 575,904 | 1,192,359 | 113,099 | 31,982 | 3,830,565 | |||||||||||||||||||
President & Chief |
2015 | 780,000 | | 1,163,790 | 448,224 | 1,077,821 | 86,016 | 37,209 | 3,593,060 | |||||||||||||||||||
Executive Officer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
George L. Wilson |
2017 |
352,546 |
|
233,641 |
95,589 |
142,285 |
40,684 |
30,768 |
895,513 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Vice PresidentChief |
2016 | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating Officer |
2015 | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Brent L. Korb |
2017 |
418,000 |
|
455,688 |
221,445 |
82,943 |
165,149 |
36,939 |
1,380,164 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice |
2016 | 417,308 | | 359,166 | 188,160 | 393,986 | 457,552 | 35,688 | 1,851,860 | |||||||||||||||||||
PresidentFinance & |
2015 | 400,000 | | 378,955 | 146,624 | 431,274 | | 34,483 | 1,391,336 | |||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kevin P. Delaney |
2017 |
375,000 |
|
386,566 |
188,195 |
70,146 |
206,398 |
46,758 |
1,273,063 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President |
2016 | 374,423 | | 305,098 | 159,264 | 329,790 | 555,736 | 44,182 | 1,768,493 | |||||||||||||||||||
General Counsel & |
2015 | 360,000 | | 321,345 | 129,042 | 350,443 | | 44,532 | 1,205,362 | |||||||||||||||||||
Secretary |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
M. Dewayne Williams |
2017 |
232,000 |
|
106,201 |
51,205 |
18,484 |
19,919 |
25,789 |
453,598 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Vice President |
2016 | 231,731 | | 83,999 | 43,680 | 114,803 | 24,258 | 23,171 | 521,642 | |||||||||||||||||||
Controller |
2015 | 225,000 | | 85,693 | 33,705 | 84,166 | 18,315 | 22,727 | 469,606 |
38
|
|
Annual Incentive | Performance Unit Payout |
Performance Share Payout |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Year | Total ($) |
Deferred ($) |
Total ($) |
Deferred ($) |
Total ($) |
Deferred ($) |
Total ($) |
Deferred ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Griffiths |
2017 | | | | | 254,043 | | 254,043 | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2016 | 663,018 | | | | 529,341 | | 1,192,359 | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2015 | 723,821 | | 354,000 | | | | 1,077,821 | | |||||||||||||||||||
Wilson |
2017 |
109,108 |
|
|
|
33,177 |
|
142,285 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2016 | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2015 | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Korb |
2017 |
|
|
|
|
82,943 |
|
82,943 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2016 | 221,033 | | | | 172,953 | | 393,986 | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2015 | 241,274 | | 190,000 | | | | 431,274 | | |||||||||||||||||||
Delaney |
2017 |
|
|
|
|
70,146 |
|
70 146 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2016 | 183,042 | | | | 146,748 | | 329,790 | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2015 | 200,443 | | 150,000 | | | | 350,443 | | |||||||||||||||||||
Williams |
2017 |
|
|
|
|
18,484 |
|
18,484 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2016 | 75,495 | | | | 39,308 | | 114,803 | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2015 | 84,166 | | | | | | 84,166 | |
39
|
Year | Life Insurance ($) |
Financial Planning ($) |
Auto- mobile ($) |
Annual Club Membership ($) |
Relocation Reimbursement ($) |
401K Match ($) |
ESPP 15% Stock Match ($) |
Unvested Restricted Stock and RSU Dividends* ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Griffiths |
2017 | 17,520 | 1,790 | | | | 6,304 | | 16,293 | 41,907 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016 | 8,862 | 1,830 | | | | 6,625 | | 14,665 | 31,982 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015 | 8,870 | | | | | 6,250 | | 22,089 | 37,209 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Wilson |
2017 |
965 |
|
12,000 |
|
7,701 |
6,388 |
1,350 |
2,364 |
30,768 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016 | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015 | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Korb |
2017 |
3,826 |
789 |
14,400 |
6,186 |
|
6,750 |
|
4,988 |
36,939 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016 | 3,518 | 650 | 14,400 | 6,031 | | 6,625 | | 4,464 | 35,688 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015 | 3,519 | 600 | 14,954 | 4,776 | | 6,154 | | 4,480 | 34,483 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Delaney |
2017 |
7,519 |
7,500 |
14,400 |
6,349 |
|
6,750 |
|
4,240 |
46,758 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016 | 6,273 | 6,892 | 14,400 | 6,200 | | 6,625 | | 3,792 | 44,182 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015 | 6,276 | 6,766 | 14,954 | 6,561 | | 6,231 | | 3,744 | 44,532 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Williams |
2017 |
4,460 |
|
14,814 |
|
|
5,355 |
|
1,160 |
25,789 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016 | 4,439 | | 12,361 | | | 5,347 | | 1,024 | 23,171 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
2015 | 4,437 | | 12,642 | | | 4,816 | | 832 | 22,727 |
The following table discloses the estimated range of payouts that were possible for the fiscal year 2017 Annual Incentive Awards along with the potential estimated range of payouts that will be possible with respect to Performance Shares granted in December 2016. The table also shows the actual number of stock options and restricted stock awards granted during fiscal 2017 and their respective grant date fair value, as well as the number of Performance Shares granted in fiscal 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(4) (#) |
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options(4) (#) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) (#) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards(5) ($) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Option Awards(5) ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Grant Date | Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Griffiths |
2017 | | 407,500 | (2) | 815,000 | (2) | 1,630,000 | (2) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
11/30/16 | 32,950 | 284,565 | (3) | 758,839 | (3) | 1,517,678 | (3) | 65,850 | 102,100 | $ | 19.45 | 1,398,744 | 569,905 | |||||||||||||||||
Wilson |
2017 | | 109,631 | (2) | 219,263 | (2) | 438,525 | (2) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
11/30/16 | 5,500 | 47,500 | (3) | 126,666 | (3) | 253,332 | (3) | 11,000 | 17,100 | $ | 19.45 | 233,641 | 95,589 | |||||||||||||||||
Korb |
2017 | | 135,850 | (2) | 271,700 | (2) | 543,400 | (2) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
11/30/16 | 10,750 | 92,840 | (3) | 247,573 | (3) | 495,146 | (3) | 21,450 | 33,300 | $ | 19.45 | 455,688 | 221,445 | |||||||||||||||||
Delaney |
2017 | | 112,500 | (2) | 225,000 | (2) | 450,000 | (2) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
11/30/16 | 9,100 | 78,589 | (3) | 209,571 | (3) | 419,142 | (3) | 18,200 | 28,300 | $ | 19.45 | 386,566 | 188,195 | |||||||||||||||||
Williams |
2017 | | 58,000 | (2) | 116,000 | (2) | 232,000 | (2) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
11/30/16 | 2,500 | 21,591 | (3) | 57,576 | (3) | 115,152 | (3) | 5,000 | 7,700 | $ | 19.45 | 106,201 | 51,205 |
40
earn from 0% to 200% of the awards granted (Threshold75%; Target100%; Maximum200%). Threshold can be achieved for each of the performance measures independently. Therefore, threshold as presented above is calculated at 37.5% (50% of 75% of Target). The award includes an enhancement based upon achievement of a designated return on invested capital (ROIC), but the maximum cannot exceed 200% (even if the enhancement is achieved). Achievement of the enhancement was not assumed for purposes of this presentation. The figures presented in this item represent the non-equity portion (amount expected to settle in cash). The portion expected to settle in shares has been included in item (4). This presentation assumes that the shares will settle at 100% (Target).
Please see the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section for more information regarding this program, performance shares granted thereunder, the related performance measures and the actual performance results.
Please see the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section for more information regarding this program, performance shares granted thereunder, and the related performance measures.
41
The following table provides information about the outstanding equity awards held by the named executive officers as of October 31, 2017:
Outstanding Equity Awards at October 31, 2017
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(18) ($) |
|||||||||||||
Griffiths |
| 102,100 | (1) | 19.45 | 11/30/2026 | 65,850 | (15) | 1,445,408 | |||||||||||
|
28,567 | 57,133 | (2) | 19.31 | 12/02/2025 | 57,150 | (16) | 1,254,443 | |||||||||||
|
32,200 | 16,100 | (3) | 20.28 | 12/03/2024 | 53,600 | (17) | 1,176,520 | |||||||||||
|
55,800 | | (4) | 17.63 | 12/05/2023 | | | ||||||||||||
|
175,500 | | (5) | 16.72 | 7/09/2023 | | | ||||||||||||
|
5,987 | | (6) | 19.77 | 10/31/2022 | | | ||||||||||||
|
8,132 | | (6) | 14.75 | 10/31/2021 | | | ||||||||||||
|
6,390 | | (6) | 18.02 | 10/29/2020 | | | ||||||||||||
|
5,000 | | (6) | 15.58 | 2/26/2020 | | | ||||||||||||
|
5,489 | | (6) | 14.87 | 10/30/2019 | | | ||||||||||||
Wilson |
| 17,100 | (1) | 19.45 | 11/30/2026 | 11,000 | (15) | 241,450 | |||||||||||
|
4,800 | 9,600 | (2) | 19.31 | 12/02/2025 | 9,600 | (16) | 210,720 | |||||||||||
|
4,200 | 2,100 | (3) | 20.28 | 12/03/2024 | 7,000 | (17) | 153,650 | |||||||||||
|
7,300 | | (4) | 17.63 | 12/05/2023 | | | ||||||||||||
|
14,900 | | (7) | 21.11 | 12/05/2022 | | | ||||||||||||
|
17,600 | | (8) | 15.08 | 11/30/2021 | | | ||||||||||||
|
15,000 | | (9) | 20.27 | 12/1/2020 | | | ||||||||||||
Korb |
| 33,300 | (1) | 19.45 | 11/30/2026 | 21,450 | (15) | 470,828 | |||||||||||
|
9,333 | 18,667 | (2) | 19.31 | 12/02/2025 | 18,600 | (16) | 408,270 | |||||||||||
|
10,533 | 5,267 | (3) | 20.28 | 12/03/2024 | 17,450 | (17) | 383,028 | |||||||||||
|
18,200 | | (4) | 17.63 | 12/05/2023 | | | ||||||||||||
|
43,700 | | (7) | 21.11 | 12/05/2022 | | | ||||||||||||
|
54,700 | | (8) | 15.08 | 11/30/2021 | | | ||||||||||||
|
41,900 | | (10) | 16.90 | 12/1/2020 | | | ||||||||||||
|
37,500 | | (11) | 16.21 | 12/2/2019 | | | ||||||||||||
|
61,800 | | (12) | 7.83 | 12/3/2018 | | | ||||||||||||
|
100,000 | | (13) | 15.32 | 8/1/2018 | | | ||||||||||||
Delaney |
| 28,300 | (1) | 19.45 | 11/30/2026 | 18,200 | (15) | 399,490 | |||||||||||
|
7,900 | 15,800 | (2) | 19.31 | 12/02/2025 | 15,800 | (16) | 346,810 | |||||||||||
|
8,933 | 4,467 | (3) | 20.28 | 12/03/2024 | 14,800 | (17) | 324,860 | |||||||||||
|
15,500 | | (4) | 17.63 | 12/05/2023 | | | ||||||||||||
|
35,400 | | (7) | 21.11 | 12/05/2022 | | | ||||||||||||
|
46,100 | | (8) | 15.08 | 11/30/2021 | | | ||||||||||||
|
35,300 | | (10) | 16.90 | 12/1/2020 | | | ||||||||||||
|
32,400 | | (11) | 16.21 | 12/2/2019 | | | ||||||||||||
|
50,400 | | (12) | 7.83 | 12/3/2018 | | | ||||||||||||
Williams |
| 7,700 | (1) | 19.45 | 11/30/2026 | 5,000 | (15) | 109,750 | |||||||||||
|
2,167 | 4,333 | (2) | 19.31 | 12/02/2025 | 4,350 | (16) | 95,483 | |||||||||||
|
2,333 | 1,167 | (3) | 20.28 | 12/03/2024 | 3,950 | (17) | 86,703 | |||||||||||
|
4,100 | | (4) | 17.63 | 12/05/2023 | | | ||||||||||||
|
4,000 | | (14) | 16.94 | 7/01/2023 | | |
42
43
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2017
The following table provides information regarding the value realized by the named executive officers upon the exercise of options, the vesting of restricted stock awards and the vesting of the equity portion of performance shares during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017.
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized on Exercise(1) ($) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) |
Value Realized on Vesting(2) ($) |
|||||||||
Griffiths |
| | 60,600 | 1,228,665 | |||||||||
Wilson |
| | 7,850 | 159,170 | |||||||||
Korb |
| | 19,800 | 401,445 | |||||||||
Delaney |
104,809 | 656,815 | 16,800 | 340,620 | |||||||||
Williams |
| | 4,450 | 90,235 |
Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in our Salaried and Nonunion Employee Pension Plan, described below, that is generally available to all our salaried and nonunion hourly employees except for employees of certain recent acquisitions. The named executive officers are also eligible to participate in certain plans, also described below, which are only available to a select group of management and highly compensated employees.
Salaried and Nonunion Employee Pension Plan
We have established the Salaried and Nonunion Employee Pension Plan (the "Pension Plan"), a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan intended to be a tax-qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, for the benefit of substantially all of our salaried and nonunion hourly employees with the exception of those employed by the Company's cabinet components division. With some exceptions, an employee hired prior to January 1, 2018, is eligible to participate in the Pension Plan once that employee has completed one hour of service. Employees hired after January 1, 2018, are eligible to participate after reaching age 21 and completing one year of service.
Under the Pension Plan, two main types of benefits are available to participants, depending upon when they began participating in the Pension Plan or the Quanex Corporation Salaried Employees' Pension Plan (the "Quanex Corporation Pension Plan"). The employees who participated in the Quanex Corporation Pension Plan on or before December 31, 2006, are generally referred to as "Traditional Participants," while employees who began participating in the Quanex Corporation Pension Plan or the Pension Plan after such date are generally referred to as "Cash Balance Participants".
44
Under the Pension Plan, a Traditional Participant is entitled to receive a monthly single life annuity, payable following termination of employment at or after age 65, equal to the sum of (i) and (ii), less (iii), where:
(i) is the greater of (x) 1.5% of the Traditional Participant's average monthly compensation for the five consecutive calendar years that lead to the highest monthly average multiplied by his whole and fractional years of benefit service earned with Quanex Corporation prior to November 1, 1985, or (y) the product of $9.00 and his years of benefit service earned with Quanex Corporation prior to November 1, 1985;
(ii) is the greater of (x) the sum of 1% of the Traditional Participant's average monthly compensation for the five consecutive calendar years that lead to the highest monthly average up to but not in excess of 1/12 of the average of the Social Security taxable wage bases in effect for each calendar year during the 35-year period ending with the last day of the calendar year in which the Traditional Participant attains Social Security retirement age (referred to as Social Security covered compensation) and 1.5% of the Traditional Member's average monthly compensation for the five consecutive calendar years that lead to the highest monthly average in excess of 1/12 of the Traditional Member's Social Security covered compensation, the total of which is then multiplied by his whole and fractional years of benefit service earned with Quanex Corporation and the Company from and after November 1, 1985 or (y) the product of $9.00 and the Traditional Member's whole and fractional years of benefit service earned with Quanex Corporation and the Company from and after November 1, 1985; and
(iii) is the Traditional Participant's monthly accrued benefit under any qualified defined benefit plan that was maintained at any time by Quanex Corporation or the Company to the extent that the Traditional Participant's service taken into account for benefit accrual purposes under such other plan is taken into account as benefit service under the Pension Plan.
Traditional Participants are eligible for early retirement benefits when they attain age 55 with five years of service. The early retirement benefit is calculated as (x) minus (y), where (x) is the sum of items (i) and (ii) immediately above, reduced by 5/9 of 1% for each of the first 60 months that the early retirement benefit payment commencement date precedes the Traditional Participant's normal retirement date and further reduced by 5/18 of 1% for each of the months in excess of 60 that the payment commencement date precedes the Traditional Participant's normal retirement date, and (y) is item (iii) immediately above, but determined as if the Traditional Participant's benefit under such Quanex Corporation or Company qualified defined benefit plan commences to be paid at the same time as the Pension Plan benefit, using the reduction factors used in connection with such other qualified defined benefit plan.
Under the Pension Plan, upon termination of employment with the Company, a Cash Balance Participant receives the following after at least three years of vesting:
The sum of the notional company contributions accrued under the Pension Plan through the date on which the Cash Balance Participant terminates employment, where such contribution generally equals 4% of the Cash Balance Participant's compensation for the applicable year; plus
The sum of the interest credits on those notional company contributions accrued under the Pension Plan through the date on which the Cash Balance Participant terminates employment with us, where such contribution generally equals the interest rate on the 30-year Treasury security for the fifth month prior to the first day of the applicable year.
For purposes of both Traditional Participants' benefits and Cash Balance Participants' benefits, the compensation taken into account under the Pension Plan generally comprises salary and bonus compensation for the applicable year.
45
Pension Plan benefits for unmarried participants are generally payable as a single life annuity and for married participants as a 50% joint and survivor annuity, unless the participant and his spouse, if applicable, elect to receive the benefit under another optional form of payment available under the Pension Plan. If the participant receives a benefit other than a single life annuity, the benefit will be adjusted to provide the actuarial equivalence of the participant's benefit under the Pension Plan. This adjustment is designed so Pension Plan benefits will be equivalent as if the option had not been chosen.
Mr. Delaney is presently eligible to receive early retirement benefits under the Pension Plan as a Traditional Participant, and Mr. Griffiths is presently eligible to receive retirement benefits under the Pension Plan as a Cash Balance Participant.
Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan
We provide additional retirement benefits to certain of our named executive officers under the Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan (the "SERP"). Eligibility to participate in the SERP is determined by the Board of Directors. Currently the SVPFinance and CFO, and the SVPGeneral Counsel and Secretary are the only participants in the SERP.
Under the SERP, an eligible participant receives a monthly single life annuity (or actuarially equivalent optional form of payment) payable at age 65 equal to:
The eligible executive is required to remain employed until he or she has accumulated five years of service in order to receive a benefit under the SERP. SERP participants are eligible for early retirement benefits when they attain age 55 with five years of service. The early retirement benefit is calculated based on average compensation and service at early retirement, and reduced by 5% for each year benefit commencement precedes age 65. Mr. Delaney is presently eligible to receive early retirement benefits under the SERP.
Upon an eligible executive's termination of employment after a change in control, he or she will be eligible to receive a lump sum payment in lieu of any other benefit payable from the SERP. The lump sum is equal to the present value of the SERP life annuity, which is payable immediately without reduction for early payment, based on the executive's years of service and compensation at date of termination. The SERP is administered in a manner that is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
Restoration Plan
We provide additional retirement benefits to our executive officers who do not participate in the SERP under the Restoration Plan (the "Restoration Plan"). Eligibility to participate in the Restoration Plan is determined by a committee appointed by the Company's Board of Directors. Currently, the CEO, the VPController, the Company's VPInvestor Relations & Treasurer, the Company's divisional leaders, certain key employees, and certain former officers and divisional leaders are the only participants in the Restoration Plan.
46
Under the Restoration Plan, an eligible participant will receive a lump sum actuarial equivalent of a monthly benefit for life payable at age 65 equal to:
The specific elements of an executive's compensation taken into account for purposes of the Restoration Plan are the same as those items of compensation taken into account for purposes of the Pension Plan, described above.
The eligible executive must remain employed until he or she has accumulated five years of service in order to receive a benefit under the Restoration Plan. Restoration Plan participants are eligible for early retirement benefits when they attain age 55 with five years of service. The early retirement benefit is the actuarial equivalent of the participant's lump sum benefit under the Restoration Plan, determined as of his or her early retirement date. Mr. Griffiths is currently eligible to receive retirement benefits under the Restoration Plan. The Restoration Plan is administered in a manner that is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
Pension Benefits Table
The following table discloses the years of credited service of, present single-sum value of the accrued benefits as of October 31, 2017 for, and payments during fiscal year 2017 for the named executive officers under the SERP, the Pension Plan, and the Restoration Plan. For information related to the valuation method and material assumptions applied in quantifying the present value of the current accrued benefit, please see Note 9, "Retirement Plans" included in the financial statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017.
Name
|
Plan Name | Number of Years Credited Service (#) |
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit ($) |
Payments During Last Fiscal Year ($) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
William C. Griffiths |
Restoration Plan(3) | 4.32 | 325,137 | | ||||||||
|
Pension Plan(2) | 4.32 | 72,651 | | ||||||||
George L. Wilson |
Restoration Plan(3) | 9.16 | 99,968 | | ||||||||
|
Pension Plan(2) | 9.16 | 113,558 | | ||||||||
Brent L. Korb |
SERP(1) | 13.95 | 1,414,176 | | ||||||||
|
Pension Plan(2) | 13.95 | 253,011 | | ||||||||
Kevin P. Delaney |
SERP(1) | 14.29 | 1,597,039 | | ||||||||
|
Pension Plan(2) | 14.29 | 504,229 | | ||||||||
M. Dewayne Williams |
Restoration Plan(3) | 4.33 | 11,181 | | ||||||||
|
Pension Plan(2) | 4.33 | 70,976 | |
47
the executive's number of years of service and the denominator of which is 20. The definition of "compensation" under the SERP includes W-2 wages modified by excluding reimbursements or other expense allowances, fringe benefits (cash and noncash), moving expenses, deferred compensation, welfare benefits, performance shares, performance RSUs, restricted stock awards and stock options; and modified further by including elective contributions under a Company cafeteria plan and the 401(k) Plan.
Vesting in the SERP is based on five years of service. Early retirement under the SERP requires a participant to attain age 55 with five years of service. Mr. Delaney is currently eligible to receive an early retirement benefit under the SERP. If a participant retires prior to age 65, the accrued benefit is reduced 5% for each year (and fractional year) that the participant's benefit commencement precedes age 65.
Benefits under the SERP are paid under the following options:
The SERP also pays a death benefit to the designated beneficiary if the participant has retired or terminated employment, but has not commenced payment. In addition, the SERP pays a disability benefit. Should a participant with six months of service terminate due to disability prior to early retirement, the SERP will pay a disability benefit until age 65 equal to 50% of the sum of his monthly earnings in effect at the date of his disability and the monthly equivalent of the average of his incentive awards for the prior three plan years, less the sum of (1) the participant's Pension Plan benefit; (2) the participant's Social Security benefit; (3) the participant's benefit under the Company's group long-term disability insurance plan; (4) the participant's benefit under an individual disability policy provided by the Company; and (5) the participant's benefit under the Company's wage continuation policy plan. Benefits payable from the SERP are equal to the actuarial equivalent of the accrued benefit at date of distribution employing the actuarial equivalent definition from the Pension Plan. The Company has no policy for granting additional service under the SERP. Mr. Griffiths is not participating in the SERP, and therefore participates in the Restoration Plan, described below.
48
Traditional Participants and 3 years of vesting service for Cash Balance Participants. Early retirement under the Pension Plan requires a Traditional Participant to have attained age 55 with 5 years of service. Mr. Delaney is currently eligible to receive an early retirement benefit under the Pension Plan. Benefits commencing prior to age 65 are reduced 5/9ths of 1% for each of the first 60 months, and an additional 5/18ths of 1% for each month in excess of 60 that benefits commence prior to age 65. The Company has no policy for granting additional service under the Pension Plan. Mr. Delaney is a Traditional Participant, and Messrs. Griffiths, Wilson, Korb and Williams are Cash Balance Participants.
Qualified Defined Contribution Plans
Salaried and Nonunion Employee 401(k) Plan
We have established the Salaried and Nonunion Employee 401(k) Plan (the "401(k) Plan"), a defined contribution plan intended to be a tax-qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, for the benefit of substantially all of our salaried and nonunion hourly employees. An employee is eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan on the later of (i) the date the Company or an affiliate which employs the employee adopts the 401(k) Plan or (ii) the date the employee completes one hour of service for the Company. Effective January 1, 2017, employees of the Company's cabinet components division became eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan.
Participants in the 401(k) Plan may contribute from 1% of compensation per payroll period up to a maximum percentage per payroll period to be determined by the administrative committee of the Company's plans appointed by the Board of Directors (the "Benefits Committee"). Effective January 1, 2017, certain highly compensated employees became subject to a maximum payroll contribution of 7% per payroll period. In addition, any new participants who do not affirmatively elect otherwise have 3% of their compensation per payroll period automatically contributed to the 401(k) Plan. To the extent permitted by the Benefits Committee, participants may also make after-tax contributions to the 401(k) Plan. Effective January 1, 2017, participants are also allowed to make Roth contributions to the 401(k) Plan.
Effective January 1, 2018, the Company makes matching contributions to each participant's account equal to 50% of the pre-tax contributions the participant makes to the 401(k) Plan, up to 5% of the participant's eligible compensation. Prior to January 1, 2018, participants employed by the Company's cabinet components division received matching contributions equal to 35% of pre-tax
49
contributions, up to 5% of the participant's eligible compensation. The Company may, at its discretion, make profit-sharing contributions to the participants' accounts.
Participants will always be 100% vested in their pre-tax and after-tax contributions to the 401(k) Plan. Company matching and profit-sharing contributions vest 20% per year and are 100% vested after five years. In addition, a participant will be 100% vested in all amounts under the 401(k) Plan in the event of (i) disability prior to termination of employment, (ii) retirement or (iii) death prior to termination of employment.
All distributions from the 401(k) Plan will be made in a single lump sum payment.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Stock Purchase Plan") is designed to provide our eligible employees the opportunity to invest in our Common Stock through voluntary payroll deductions. In addition, participating employees receive a percentage match from the Company, thereby encouraging employees to share in the Company's success and to remain in its service. The Stock Purchase Plan is not intended to meet the requirements of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.
The Stock Purchase Plan is administered by Wells Fargo Shareowner Services (the "Bank"), who may be removed at management's election. On July 12, 2017, Wells Fargo Bank N.A. announced that it had entered into an agreement to sell the Bank to Equiniti Group plc ("Equiniti Group"). In connection with the sale of the Bank and provided that the sale closes, administration of the Stock Purchase Plan will be transferred to Equiniti Trust Company ("EQ"). Accordingly, following the closing of the sale, EQ will serve as the transfer agent and registrar for Quanex Common Stock and as administrator of the Stock Purchase Plan.
Regular full time employees of the Company or any of the Company's subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the Stock Purchase Plan. Participation in the Stock Purchase Plan is voluntary.
Contributions to the Stock Purchase Plan
Contributions to the Stock Purchase Plan consist of employees' payroll deductions and an amount from the Company equal to 15% of those deductions. The Bank establishes an account under the Stock Purchase Plan as agent for each eligible employee electing to participate in the Stock Purchase Plan and credits the following sources of cash to each employee's account for the purchase of full and fractional shares of Common Stock ("Plan Shares"):
Participants generally may not add shares of Common Stock held in their name to their accounts. All shares are held in the name of the Bank or its nominee as Plan Shares subject to the terms and conditions of the Stock Purchase Plan.
50
Purchase of Plan Shares
The Bank applies cash credited to each participant's account to the purchase of full and fractional Plan Shares and credits such Plan Shares to such participants' accounts. The price at which the Bank is deemed to have acquired Plan Shares for accounts is the average price, excluding brokerage and other costs of purchase, of all Plan Shares purchased by the Bank for all participants in the Stock Purchase Plan during the calendar month. The Bank purchases Plan Shares in negotiated transactions or on any securities exchange where the Company's Common Stock is traded. The purchases are on terms as to price, delivery and other matters, and are executed through those brokers or dealers, as the Bank may determine.
Stock Certificates
The Bank holds the Plan Shares of all participants in its name or in the name of its nominee evidenced by as many or as few certificates as the Bank determines. No certificates representing Plan Shares purchased for participants' accounts are issued to any participant unless the participant makes a request in writing or until the participant's account is terminated and the participant makes the election described below under "Termination and Withdrawal by Participants." Certificates are not issued for fewer than ten shares unless the participant's account is terminated.
Voting of Plan Shares
The Bank will vote each participant's Plan Shares as instructed by the participant on a form to be furnished by and returned to the Bank at least five days (or such shorter period as the law may require) before the meeting at which the Plan Shares are to be voted. The Bank will not vote Plan Shares for which no instructions are received.
Assignment or Sale
Except as otherwise described herein, participants cannot sell, pledge, or otherwise assign or transfer their accounts, any interest in their accounts or any cash or Plan Shares credited to their accounts. Any attempt to do so will be void.
Subject to the restrictions set forth below under "Restrictions on Resale," each participant may request that the Bank sell:
If a participant elects to sell all of his or her Plan Shares, such participant will be deemed to have terminated participation in the Stock Purchase Plan.
Termination and Withdrawal by a Participant
Participants may terminate their participation in the Stock Purchase Plan at any time by giving proper notice. Upon receipt of such notice, unless the participant has made a contrary election in written response to the Bank's notice relating to such participant's account, the Bank will send the participant a certificate or certificates representing the full Plan Shares accumulated in the participant's account and a check for the net proceeds of any fractional share in the participant's account. After the participant's withdrawal, the sale by the participant of any shares of Common Stock issued to the
51
participant upon such withdrawal is subject to the restrictions below under "Restrictions on Resale." If a participant elects to terminate his or her participation in the Stock Purchase Plan, he or she may rejoin the Stock Purchase Plan at any time with respect to future offering periods.
Restrictions on Resale
The Company's officers, directors and affiliates (as defined by the relevant securities laws) are subject to certain restrictions on resale that apply to sales by (i) the Bank on their behalf of shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Stock Purchase Plan and (ii) the participant, after he or she withdraws from the Stock Purchase Plan, of shares of Common Stock issued to the participant upon his or her withdrawal from the Stock Purchase Plan.
Nonqualified Defined Benefit and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans
The Company's directors, executive officers, key management and highly compensated employees are eligible to participate in certain non-tax qualified plans described below.
2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended
The Company recognizes the importance of aligning the interests of its directors, officers, and employees with those of its stockholders. This alignment of interests is reflected in the Omnibus Plan, which provides those persons who have substantial responsibility for the management and growth of the Company and its affiliates with additional performance incentives and an opportunity to obtain or increase their proprietary interest in the Company, thereby encouraging them to continue in their employment or affiliation with the Company and its affiliates.
The Omnibus Plan provides for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance share awards, performance unit awards, annual incentive awards, other stock-based awards and cash-based awards. Certain awards under the Omnibus Plan may be paid in cash or in Common Stock. Eligibility will be determined by the Compensation Committee, which has exclusive authority to select the officer and employee participants to whom awards may be granted, and may determine the type, size and terms of each award. The Compensation Committee will also make all determinations that it decides are necessary or desirable in the interpretation and administration of the Omnibus Plan.
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company maintains the Quanex Building Products Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Deferred Compensation Plan"), a plan not intended to be qualified under section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, which allows certain highly compensated management personnel and directors to defer all or a portion of their directors' fees, certain compensation under the Omnibus Plan and compensation under the Management Incentive Plan (the "MIP").
None of the named executive officers maintained a deferred compensation plan account balance during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017, and, therefore, there were no related contributions, earnings or withdrawals during fiscal 2017.
Eligibility and Participation
The individuals who are eligible to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan are all participants in the Omnibus Plan or the MIP, and all of the Company's directors, subject to additional eligibility requirements for participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan as the Compensation Committee may determine from time to time.
52
Deferral Elections
A participant may elect, during the designated election periods, (1) the percentage of his bonus awarded under the MIP (an "Incentive Bonus") earned during the applicable year to be deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan; (2) the percentage of his compensation earned under the Omnibus Plan during the applicable year ("Omnibus Compensation") to be deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan; (3) the percentage of his director fees earned during the applicable year to be deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan; (4) the percentage to be deferred in the form of deemed shares of Common Stock or other investment funds provided under the Deferred Compensation Plan; (5) the length of the period for deferral; and (6) the form of payment at the end of the period for deferral (either a lump sum, or quarterly or annual installment payments over a period of time of not less than three nor more than 20 years). All elections made are irrevocable once they are made for a given plan year, except for the election as to how the distribution is to be made or as otherwise permitted under applicable Internal Revenue Service guidance. That election can be changed if the change is made at least 12 months prior to the end of the deferral period, is not effective for at least 12 months and the scheduled payment is no earlier than five years after the date on which the payment would have otherwise have been made or commenced. If the election of the form of distribution is changed and an event causing distribution occurs within one year, the change in election will be ineffective and the original election will remain in effect.
The deferrals in the form of deemed shares of Common Stock elected by all participants in any plan year will not be allowed to exceed 3% of the shares of Common Stock outstanding on the first day of the plan year.
Company Match
Previously, if a participant elected to defer a portion of his Incentive Bonus, Omnibus Compensation or director fees under the Deferred Compensation Plan in the form of deemed shares of the Company's Common Stock for a period of three full years or more, the Company provided a matching award of additional deemed shares of Common Stock equal to 20% of the amount deferred, excluding deferrals of long-term incentives, in the form of deemed shares of our Common Stock. The Company suspended its matching award effective April 1, 2009.
The Participant's Account
Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, an account is established for each participant, which the Company maintains. The account reflects the amount of the obligation to the participant at any given time (comprising the amount of compensation deferred for the participant under the Deferred Compensation Plan, the Company match, if any, and the amount of income credited on each of these amounts). If the participant elects his deferral to be in the form of deemed shares of our Common Stock, the number of shares credited to his account as Common Stock will be the number of shares of our Common Stock that could have been purchased with the dollar amount deferred, without taking into account any brokerage fees, taxes or other expenses that might be incurred in such a transaction, based upon the closing quotation on the NYSE on the date the amount would have been paid had it not been deferred. In addition to the option to hold the account as deemed shares of Common Stock, the participant may choose from a variety of investment choices.
Dividends and Distributions Associated with Company Common Stock.
When dividends or other distributions are declared and paid on the Company's Common Stock, those dividends and other distributions will be accrued in a participant's account based upon the shares of Common Stock deemed credited to the participant's account. Such amounts credited to a participant's account will vest at the same time the underlying deemed shares of Common Stock vest
53
and will be subject to the same forfeiture restrictions. The dividends or other distributions, whether stock, property, cash or other rights, are credited to the account as additional deemed shares of the Company's Common Stock. For this purpose, all dividends and distributions not in the form of deemed shares of the Company's Common Stock or cash are valued at the fair market value as determined by the Compensation Committee.
Common Stock Conversion Election
At any time during a period commencing three years prior to the earliest time a participant could retire under the Pension Plan and ending on the participant's normal retirement date as established under the Pension Plan, the participant is allowed to elect a retirement date under the Pension Plan and may elect to have all deemed shares of Common Stock in his account converted to cash and deemed to be invested in the participant's selected investment options. At any time which is at least three years after deemed Common Stock is credited to a participant's account, the participant is allowed to elect to have such deemed Common Stock converted to cash and deemed to be invested in the participant's selected investment options.
Vesting
All deferrals of the Incentive Bonus, Omnibus Compensation and director fees are 100% vested at all times, except in the event of forfeiture as described below. Company matching contributions and dividends are 100% vested after the earliest of (i) three years after the applicable deemed share of Common Stock is credited to the participant's account, (ii) the participant's death, (iii) the participant's termination of employment due to disability or (iv) the participant's retirement.
If the Compensation Committee finds that the participant was discharged by the Company for fraud, embezzlement, theft, commission of a felony, proven dishonesty in the course of his employment by the Company that damaged the Company, for disclosing its trade secrets, or for competing directly or indirectly with the Company at any time during the first two years following his termination of employment, the entire amount credited to his account, exclusive of the total deferrals of the participant, will be forfeited. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such forfeitures will not apply to a participant discharged during the plan year in which a change of control occurs.
Distributions under the Deferred Compensation Plan
Upon a distribution or withdrawal, the balance of all amounts deemed invested in investment funds and the number of deemed shares of Common Stock credited to the participant and required to be distributed is distributed in cash, whether the distribution or withdrawal is in a lump sum or in installments. The value per deemed share of common stock will be calculated based on the closing quotation for the Company's Common Stock on the NYSE. Distributions are made with respect to a participant's interest in the Deferred Compensation Plan upon the expiration of the term of deferral as was previously elected by the participant or upon the participant's earlier death or disability. A withdrawal may be made by the participant prior to an event causing distribution, in an amount needed to satisfy an emergency or in certain unforeseeable events of hardship beyond the control of the participant, as approved by the Compensation Committee.
The Deferred Compensation Plan is administered in a manner that is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
54
The following table sets forth, as of the Record Date, the number and percentage of beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock, Restricted Stock Units, shares of Phantom Common Stock credited under the Deferred Compensation Plan, and the amount of shares obtainable upon conversion of options exercisable (or exercisable within 60 days) for each current director and nominee for director of the Company, the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 37 of this Proxy Statement, and all officers and directors as a group. Each of the directors and executive officers has sole voting and investment authority with respect to the securities listed by their name below. Unless otherwise indicated, the directors and current executive officers have not pledged as security any of the shares beneficially owned by them.
|
Common Stock Owned of Record |
Restricted Stock Units |
Phantom Common Stock Credited Under DC Plan |
Common Stock Underlying Exercisable Options(1) |
Total | Percent | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
William C. Griffiths |
186,350 | 5,954 | 0 | 401,764 | 594,068 | 1.69 | % | ||||||||||||
George L. Wilson |
36,686 | 0 | 0 | 76,400 | 113,086 | * | |||||||||||||
Brent L. Korb |
102,805 | 0 | 0 | 403,366 | 506,171 | 1.44 | % | ||||||||||||
Kevin P. Delaney |
109,127 | 0 | 0 | 203,333 | 312,460 | * | |||||||||||||
M. Dewayne Williams |
12,672 | 0 | 0 | 17,700 | 30,372 | * | |||||||||||||
Robert R. Buck |
0 | 16,545 | 20,839 | 20,876 | 58,260 | * | |||||||||||||
Susan F. Davis |
25,182 | 23,956 | 20,940 | 46,308 | 116,386 | * | |||||||||||||
LeRoy D. Nosbaum |
2,500 | 19,656 | 0 | 35,398 | 57,554 | * | |||||||||||||
Joseph D. Rupp |
0 | 23,956 | 0 | 56,308 | 80,264 | * | |||||||||||||
Curtis M. Stevens |
0 | 19,656 | 14,438 | 35,398 | 69,492 | * | |||||||||||||
All Officers and Directors as a group(2) |
485,332 | 109,723 | 56,217 | 1,307,950 | 1,959,222 | 5.59 | % |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Under SEC rules, the Company's directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Company's equity securities are required to file certain reports of their ownership, and changes in that ownership, with the SEC. Based solely on its review of copies of these reports and representations of such reporting persons, the Company believes that all such SEC filing requirements were satisfied during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017.
55
The following sections of this Proxy Statement provide an overview of the Company's corporate governance structure, including our Board leadership structure, certain responsibilities and activities of the Board and its Committees and independence and other criteria we use in selecting Director nominees. We also discuss how our stockholders and other stakeholders can communicate with the Board of Directors.
Ongoing Governance InitiativeBoard Declassification
The Company takes good corporate governance extremely seriously and is committed to evolving to meetand exceedcorporate governance best practices. To this end, following a careful review of the Company's practices, the Board adopted a number of governance reforms in 2015 and 2016, including a phased declassification of the Board to be achieved over three years. Director nominees at the 2017 Annual Meeting were nominated for terms of only one year, and the same is true for director nominees at the upcoming 2018 Annual Meeting. All future director terms will also be for terms of only one year. As a result, the Board will be fully declassified beginning with the Company's Annual Meeting to be held in 2019.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The following corporate governance guidelines have been adopted by the Board of Directors as the framework within which directors and management can effectively pursue the Company's objectives of adding to stockholder value. These guidelines reflect the practices and principles by which the Company operates. The Board periodically reviews and may update these guidelines and other corporate governance matters.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board
Board Committees
56
Board Procedure
Board Resources
57
Director Qualifications
58
other public company boards, as specifically set out in the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines; and
Director Responsibilities
Director Compensation
59
Role of Lead Director
60
Officer Responsibilities
Incentive Recoupment
Hedging Prohibition
61
associates are prohibited from engaging in any of the following activities with respect to Company securities:
Amendment and Waiver
Communications with the Company
Quanex invites inquiries to the Company and its Board of Directors. Interested persons may contact the appropriate individual or department by choosing one of the options below.
General
Investor Information:
For Investor Relations matters or to obtain a printed copy of the Company Code of Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines or charters for the Audit, Compensation & Management Development, and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees of the Board of Directors, send a request to the Company's principal address below or by email to inquiry@quanex.com. This material may also be obtained from the Company website at www.quanex.com in the "Investor Relations" section. The Company has also adopted a Code of Business Conduct & Ethics for Senior Financial Executives that applies to the Company's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting
62
officer or controller and persons performing similar functions. This Code can be obtained without charge in the same manner as the other material described in this paragraph.
The Company's required Securities Exchange Act filings such as annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the Company's website, as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "1934 Act" or the "Exchange Act"). Forms 3, 4 and 5 filed with respect to equity securities under Section 16(a) of the 1934 Act are also available on the Company's website. All of these materials are located in the "Investor Relations" section of the Company's website at www.quanex.com. They can also be obtained free of charge upon request to the Company's principal address or telephone number below, or by email to inquiry@quanex.com.
Communications with the Company's Board of Directors:
Persons wishing to communicate to the Company's Board of Directors or a specified individual director may do so by sending communications in care of the Chairman of the Board of Directors at the Company's principal address below, or by sending an email to chairman@quanex.com. The Chairman reviews all such messages received. If the communication is from a stockholder about a matter of stockholder interest and is addressed to a specified individual director(s), the Chairman will forward the communication as soon as practicable to such specified director(s). However, because other appropriate avenues of communication exist for matters that are not of stockholder interest, such as general business complaints or employee grievances, communications that do not relate to matters of stockholder interest may not be forwarded to specified Board members or the Board as whole. The Chairman or his delegate has the right, but not the obligation, to forward such other communications to appropriate channels within the Company.
As noted in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Lead Director shall preside at each executive session of non-management directors. Any stockholder wishing to send communications to such presiding director, or non-management directors as a group, may do so by sending them in the care of Lead Director, Quanex Building Products Corporation Board of Directors, at the Company's principal executive offices.
Alert Line
Accounting Issues:
Persons who have concerns or complaints regarding questionable accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters may submit them to the Senior Vice PresidentFinance and Chief Financial Officer at the Company's principal address or by contacting the Company's Alert Line by calling (888) 475-0633 or visiting https://quanex.alertline.com.
Such communications will be kept confidential to the fullest extent possible. If the individual is not satisfied with the response, he or she may contact the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company by sending a communication in care of the Audit Committee Chairman at the Company's principal address below. If concerns or complaints require confidentiality, then this confidentiality will be protected, subject to applicable laws.
Reporting Illegal or Unethical Behavior:
Employees, officers and directors who suspect or know of violations of the Company Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, or illegal or unethical business or workplace conduct by employees, officers or directors have an obligation to report it. If the individuals to whom such information is
63
conveyed are not responsive, or if there is reason to believe that reporting to such individuals is inappropriate in particular cases, then the employee, officer or director may contact the Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Internal Audit, or any corporate officer in person, by telephone, by letter to the Company's principal address, or online as set forth below. Quanex also encourages persons who are not affiliated with the Company to report any suspected illegal or unethical behavior.
1) By Letter
Quanex
Building Products Corporation
1800 West Loop South, Suite 1500
Houston, Texas 77027
2) By Telephone
Toll Free ALERT LINE: (888) 475-0633
3) Via Internet
https://quanex.alertline.com
Such communications will be kept confidential to the fullest extent possible. If the individual is not satisfied with the response, he or she may contact the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. If concerns or complaints require confidentiality, then this confidentiality will be protected, subject to applicable laws.
64
STRUCTURE AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Company's Board consists of six directors. All directors other than Mr. Griffiths are independent in accordance with the independence requirements set forth in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Company's independent directors sit on all of the three primary committees. Therefore the Audit, Compensation & Management Development, and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees are all comprised solely of independent directors. In addition, the Board selects a separate independent Lead Director. Currently, Mr. Rupp serves as the independent Lead Director.
The Board believes that its leadership structure is best for the Company at the current time. The Board believes that a number of advantages are gained by combining the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer along with an appropriately empowered Lead Director. By vesting chairmanship duties in the Chief Executive Officer, the Board is effectively providing a leadership role to the director who is most familiar with the Company's business and industry, most capable of effectively identifying strategic priorities, and most effective at leading the strategic discussions that will drive the Company's future. By allowing the Chief Executive Officer to lead meetings and discussions, the Board ensures that its focus remains on those items that are most important to the business and its strategic direction, while allowing independent directors to provide advice and oversight based on their own valuable experience and expertise. It also allows for a more effective flow of information between the Board and management, improving efficiency and reducing confusion about the Company's strategic and operational directions. Further, combining the roles provides for strong and stable leadership vested in a single person, thereby avoiding confusion and providing appropriate accountability for the Company's leader. The Board and the Lead Director ensure this accountability by providing oversight of the Chairman and CEO, both directly by the Lead Director through personal conversations with the Chairman and CEO, and also by the Board through its annual CEO performance reviews and periodic director performance reviews.
The Company's independent directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions at each of the Company's regular Board meetings, without management present and with the Lead Director presiding. The Lead Director is actively engaged in facilitating communication with the individual directors and the CEO, and provides guidance and counsel to the CEO on behalf of the independent directors.
In addition, the Lead Director is responsible for chairing the Board in the absence of the Chairman; acting as liaison between the Board and the Chairman; assisting the Chairman in setting the agenda for Board meetings; ensuring that there are adequate opportunities for executive sessions of the directors and communicating the results of all such sessions; participating in one-on-one discussions with individual directors as requested by the Governance Committee; and working with the Chairman to form Special Committees of the Board, if necessary.
During fiscal 2017, the Board of Directors met eight times, and the independent directors met five times in executive session with the Lead Director presiding. In addition, the Audit Committee met five times, the Compensation & Management Development Committee met three times, and the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee met twice. The Executive Committee did not meet. All directors attended more than 75% of the combined number of Board meetings and meetings of committees of which they are members. The Company's Board of Directors holds a meeting immediately following each year's annual meeting of stockholders. Therefore, members of the Company's Board of Directors generally attend the Company's annual meetings of stockholders. All Board members attended the 2017 stockholders' meeting, with Ms. Davis attending telephonically.
The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Buck, Nosbaum, and Stevens (Chairman), each of whom satisfies the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and the 1934 Act
65
and meets the definitions of "non-employee director" under Rule 16b-3 of the 1934 Act and "outside director" under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. In addition, all members of the Audit Committee have been designated "audit committee financial experts" within the meaning of Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.
The Audit Committee's responsibilities to the Board are detailed in the written Audit Committee Charter adopted by the Company's Board of Directors, which is posted on the Company's website at www.quanex.com and incorporated in this Proxy Statement by reference. The Audit Committee's primary functions include monitoring the integrity of the Company's financial reporting process, reviewing the Company's system of internal financial and disclosure controls and the performance of the Company's internal audit function, oversight of the Company's annual independent audit and its public accountant's qualifications and independence, and reviewing compliance with applicable laws and regulations which may represent material financial exposure to the Company. Interested Stockholders may also obtain a copy of the Audit Committee Charter, free of charge, by contacting the Company at the address or phone number listed in the section entitled "Communications with the Company".
Audit Committee Report to Stockholders
We have reviewed and discussed the Company's audited financial statements for the year ended October 31, 2017, with senior management and with Grant Thornton LLP, certified public accountants and the Company's independent registered public accounting firm. In addition, we have reviewed and discussed with senior management the design and effectiveness of the Company's internal controls over financial reporting and have further reviewed and discussed the opinion and audit of Grant Thornton LLP regarding those controls. We have also discussed various other matters with Grant Thornton LLP related to the Company's consolidated financial statements, including critical accounting policies and practices used, potential alternative treatments for material items that have been discussed with the Company, and all other material written communications between the independent registered public accounting firm and the Company.
We have reviewed and discussed with Grant Thornton LLP all communications required by auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"), including those described in PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16, "Communications with Audit Committees", and the SEC's Rule 2-07, "Communication with Audit Committees" of Regulation S-X. In addition, we have received and reviewed the written disclosures and the written letter from Grant Thornton LLP regarding its independence, as required by applicable standards of the PCAOB and the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. We have also discussed with Grant Thornton LLP its independence in connection with its audit of the Company's most recent financial statements, and we have reviewed and approved the non-audit services rendered by Grant Thornton LLP and approved all fees paid for audit and non-audit services. Following this review, we are satisfied with Grant Thornton LLP's independence from the Company.
Based on the various reviews and discussions mentioned above, the Audit Committee recommended to the board of directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
66
The information in the foregoing three paragraphs shall not be deemed to be soliciting material, or be filed with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Act, nor shall they be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate these paragraphs by reference.
Dated January 26, 2018
Audit Committee
Curtis
M. Stevens, Chairman
Robert R. Buck
LeRoy D. Nosbaum
Audit and Related Fees
The following table reflects fees for professional audit services rendered by Grant Thornton LLP, for (i) the audit of the Company's financial statements for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2017 and 2016; and (ii) fees billed for other services rendered by Grant Thornton LLP during these periods.
|
FY 2017 | FY 2016 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audit Fees(1) |
$ | 1,576,964 | $ | 1,744,196 | |||
Audit Related Fees(2) |
| 135,726 | |||||
Tax Fees(3) |
55,267 | 134,337 | |||||
All Other Fees(4) |
15,900 | | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total |
$ | 1,648,131 | $ | 2,014,259 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Procedures for Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services
Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving, in advance, any audit and any permissible non-audit engagement between the Company and its independent auditors. Grant Thornton LLP's engagement to conduct the audit of Quanex Building Products Corporation for fiscal 2017 was approved by the Audit Committee on January 19, 2017.
67
Additionally, each permissible audit and non-audit engagement or relationship between the Company and Grant Thornton LLP entered into during fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017 was reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee, as provided in its charter.
We have been advised by Grant Thornton LLP that substantially all of the work done in conjunction with its audit of the Company's financial statements for the most recently completed fiscal year was performed by full-time employees and partners of Grant Thornton LLP. The Audit Committee has determined that the provision of services rendered for all other fees, as described above, is compatible with maintaining independence of Grant Thornton LLP.
Compensation & Management Development Committee
The current members of the Compensation & Management Development Committee are Messrs. Rupp and Nosbaum and Ms. Davis (Chairwoman). The Compensation & Management Development Committee's responsibilities to the Board are detailed in the Compensation & Management Development Committee Charter, which is available on the Company's website at www.quanex.com and incorporated in this Proxy Statement by reference. In addition to oversight of compensation related matters, the committee oversees performance, development and succession planning with respect to officers and key executives. Interested Stockholders may also obtain a copy of the Compensation & Management Development Committee Charter, free of charge, by contacting the Company at the address and phone number listed in the section entitled "Communications with the Company".
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017, each of Ms. Davis and Messrs. Rupp and Nosbaum satisfied the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and met the definitions of "non-employee director" under Rule 16b-3 under the 1934 Act and "outside director" under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of our employees, officers or former officers serve (or served during the last fiscal year) as a member of our compensation committee. None of our executive officers serve (or served during the last fiscal year) as a member of the board of directors of any other company of which any member of our compensation committee or Board of Directors is an executive officer.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation and Management Development Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation and Management Development Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included herein and incorporated by reference into the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2017.
The information in the foregoing paragraph shall not be deemed to be soliciting material, or be filed with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this paragraph by reference.
Dated November 30, 2017
Compensation and Management Development Committee
Susan
F. Davis, Chairwoman
LeRoy D. Nosbaum
Joseph D. Rupp
68
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
All directors other than Mr. Griffiths serve as members of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee, with Mr. Rupp acting as Chairman. Each member of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee satisfies the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC.
The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee's responsibilities to the Board are detailed in the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Charter available on the Company's website at www.quanex.com and incorporated herein by reference. Interested Stockholders may also obtain a copy of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Charter, free of charge, by contacting the Company at the address or phone number listed in the section entitled "Communications with the Company" on page 60.
The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee develops and maintains qualification criteria and procedures for the identification and recruitment of candidates for election to serve as directors of the Company. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee relies on the knowledge and relationships of the Company and its officers and directors, as well as third parties when it deems necessary, to identify and evaluate nominees for director, including nominees recommended by stockholders. Although the Company has no formal policy on diversity for board members, the board considers diversity of experience and background in an effort to ensure that the composition of our directors creates a strong and effective board.
The Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth age limitations for directors and require that a majority of our directors be independent in accordance with the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and SEC. In addition, the Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth the minimum qualifications for a director and provide that the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee will be responsible for establishing additional qualifications for directors, taking into account the composition and skills of the entire Board. In general, persons considered for Board positions must have demonstrated leadership capabilities, be of sound mind and high moral character, have no personal or financial interest that would conflict with the interests of the Company, possess certain key attributes that benefit the Company, and be willing and able to commit the necessary time for Board and committee service.
Subject to certain exceptions as set out in its charter, the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and pre-approving any financial arrangement, transaction or relationship (including indebtedness or guarantees of indebtedness), or series of similar transactions within a fiscal year, in which the Company is a participant, any related party has a direct or indirect material interest, and the amount involved is $100,000 or more. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee is further responsible for providing advance approval of any charitable contribution made on behalf of a related party or to an organization where a related party is an officer or director, if the amount involved is $10,000 or more within a fiscal year, and the Company is a direct or indirect participant.
Nomination of Directors
The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee will consider director nominees recommended by stockholders of the Company in accordance with the rules and procedures set forth in the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee's charter and the Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws. Under its charter, the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee will consider nominees for director recommended by stockholders of the Company, provided such recommendations are addressed to the chairman of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee at the Company's principal executive office and received by the Chairman of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee in accordance with the time limits set forth in the Company's Bylaws. The
69
Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws in turn provide that, subject to certain limitations discussed below, any stockholder entitled to vote in the election of directors generally may nominate one or more persons for election as director at the meeting. The Company's Bylaws also provide that a stockholder must give written notice of such stockholder's intent to make such nomination or nominations, either by personal delivery or by United States mail, postage prepaid, which must be delivered to or mailed and received at the Company's principal executive offices not later than the close of business on the 90th day nor earlier than 120 days prior to the first anniversary date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the Annual Meeting is more than 60 days later than the anniversary date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting, the notice must be received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the earlier of the date on which a written statement setting forth the date of the Annual Meeting was mailed to stockholders or the date on which it is first disclosed to the public. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the number of directors to be elected to the Board at an annual meeting is increased and there is no public announcement by the Company naming all of the nominees for director or specifying the size of the increased board of directors at least 100 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting, a stockholder's notice shall also be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if it shall be delivered to the Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which such public announcement is first made by the Company. From time to time, the Company may engage outside director search firms to assist in identifying and recruiting appropriate director nominees.
There are no differences in the manner in which the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee evaluates nominees for director based on whether the nominee is recommended by the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee or by a stockholder.
The current members of the Executive Committee are Messrs. Rupp, Stevens and Griffiths, who is Chairman. When necessary, the Executive Committee acts on behalf of the Board between regularly scheduled meetings of the Board of Directors. Mr. Rupp currently serves as the Board's Lead Director.
Our Board is responsible for oversight of the Company's risk assessment and management process. The Board delegated to the Compensation & Management Development Committee basic responsibility for oversight of management's compensation risk assessment, and the Committee reports to the Board on its review. The Board also delegated tasks related to risk process oversight to the Audit Committee, which reports the results of its review to the Board. In addition to the reports from the Audit and Compensation & Management Development Committees, our Board periodically discusses risk oversight. The Company's Vice President of Internal Audit reports directly to the Audit Committee and has direct and unrestricted access to the Committee. In addition, the Audit Committee meets in executive session at each of its meetings with the Director of Internal Audit, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, and a representative of the Company's outside auditor. The Company's General Counsel also updates the Board at each of its meetings.
70
The following table contains information regarding the beneficial ownership of each person or entity that is known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company's outstanding Common Stock as of the Record Date. Such information is based solely upon information provided to the Company by such owners' required SEC filings, including Schedules 13F, 13G and 13D. Beneficial ownership is measured against the Company's total shares outstanding as of the Record Date.
Name and Address
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
Percent (%) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BlackRock Inc. |
5,120,523 | (1) | 14.60 | ||||
55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055 |
|||||||
Praesidium Investment |
3,419,624 |
(2) |
9.75 |
||||
1411 Broadway, 29th Floor, New York, NY 10018 |
|||||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. |
3,138,076 |
(3) |
8.95 |
||||
P.O. Box 2600, V26, Valley Forge, PA 19482-2600 |
|||||||
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP |
2,891,182 |
(4) |
8.24 |
||||
6300 Bee Cave Road, Building 1, Austin, TX 78746-5833 |
|||||||
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. |
2,564,515 |
(5) |
7.31 |
||||
P.O. Box 89000, Baltimore, MD 21289 |
|||||||
Cook & Bieler LP |
2,329,147 |
(6) |
6.64 |
||||
1700 Market Street, Suite 3222, Philadelphia, PA 19103-3991 |
|||||||
Victory Capital Management, Inc. |
1,964,708 |
(7) |
5.60 |
||||
4900 Tiedeman Road, 4th Floor, Brooklyn, OH 44144-2338 |
71
Other Matters, Stockholder Nominations, and Stockholder Proposals
At the date of this Proxy Statement, management is not aware of any matters to be presented for action at the meeting other than those described above. However, if any other matters should come before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card to vote in accordance with their judgment on such matters.
To be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy relating to our next Annual Meeting of Stockholders, stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act must be received at 1800 West Loop South, Suite 1500, Houston, Texas 77027, Attn: Corporate Secretary, no later than September 28, 2018. We have not yet determined when we will hold our next Annual Meeting of Stockholders. If we determine to hold such meeting more than 30 days from the first anniversary of the date of the Annual Meeting, we will publicly announce such date to stockholders as soon as reasonably practicable.
The Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws provide that, for business to be properly brought before an Annual Meeting by a stockholder (including director nominations by stockholders or stockholder proposals outside the processes of Rule 14a-8), the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Company. To be timely, a stockholder's notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the Company, not less than 90 days (which for the 2018 meeting would be December 1, 2018) nor more than 120 days (which for the 2018 meeting would be November 1, 2018) prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the Annual Meeting is more than 60 days (which for the 2018 meeting would be April 30, 2019) later than the anniversary date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the earlier of the date on which a written statement setting forth the date of the Annual Meeting was mailed to stockholders or the date on which it is first disclosed to the public.
To be in proper form, a stockholder's notice must set forth the following items:
(i) If the stockholder proposes to nominate a person for election as a director, the notice must set forth (A) all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to and in accordance with Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (or any subsequent provisions replacing such Act, rules or regulations), (B) such person's written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected, and (C) a completed and signed questionnaire, representation and agreement as required by the Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws.
(ii) If the stockholder proposes to bring any other matter before the Annual Meeting, the notice must set forth (A) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the Annual Meeting, (B) the reasons for conducting such business at the Annual Meeting, (C) the text of the proposal or business (including the text of any resolutions proposed for consideration and in the event that such business includes a proposal to amend the Bylaws of the Company, the language of the proposed amendment), (D) any material interest in such business of such stockholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made, and (E) a description of all agreements, arrangements and understandings between such stockholder and beneficial owner, if any, and any other person or persons (including their names) in connection with the proposal of such business by such stockholder.
72
(iii) In either case, the notice must also set forth, as to the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made, (A) the name and address, as they appear on the Company's books, of such stockholder proposing such proposal, and of such beneficial owner, if any; (B)(1) the class and number of shares of the Company which are directly or indirectly owned beneficially or of record by such stockholder and by such beneficial owner, (2) the existence and material terms of any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding, or relationship pursuant to which such stockholder or beneficial owner, if any, has a right to vote any shares of any security of the Company (including, if applicable, any contract, arrangement, understanding or relationship pursuant to which any economic interest in the capital stock to be voted is beneficially owned by a person or persons other than the stockholder of record as of the record date), (3) any short interest in any security of the Company (as such term is defined in Section 3.4 of the Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws), in each case with respect to the information required to be included in the notice pursuant to (1) through (3) above, as of the date of such notice and including, without limitation, any such interests held by members of such stockholder's or such beneficial owner's immediate family sharing the same household; (C) any other information relating to such stockholder and beneficial owner, if any, that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitation of proxies for election of directors in a contested election pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder (or any subsequent provisions replacing such Act, rules or regulations); (D) a representation that the person is a holder of record or otherwise has the right to vote shares of stock of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to propose such business or nomination; (E) if the person does not own any stock of record, a representation as to who owns the shares of stock the person intends to vote of record and the basis upon which the person has the right to vote the shares of stock; and (F) a representation whether the stockholder or the beneficial owner, if any, intends or is part of a group that intends (1) to deliver a proxy statement or form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the Company's outstanding capital stock required to approve or adopt the proposal or elect the nominees or (2) otherwise to solicit proxies from stockholders in support of such proposal or nomination.
Copies of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017 (including the financial statements, the financial statement schedules, and any exhibits), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, portions of which are incorporated by reference as provided in this Proxy Statement, are available at no charge to stockholders of record upon written request to the address set forth above in the section entitled "Communications with the Company".
Houston,
Texas
January 26, 2018
73
ANNEX A
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE RECONCILIATION
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
Reconciliation of Pro Forma EBITDA to Consolidated Net Income as reported
EBITDA (defined as net income or loss before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and other, net) is a non-GAAP financial measure that Quanex's management uses to measure its operational performance and assist with financial decision making. Consolidated Pro Forma EBITDA as presented in this Proxy Statement includes the results of Nichols Aluminum, excluding a gain on the sale of Nichols. The Company believes the non-GAAP measure EBITDA provides a consistent basis for comparison between periods, and will assist investors in understanding our financial performance when comparing our results to other investment opportunities. As used in this Proxy Statement, the Company also believes that EBITDA (including the presentation of Consolidated Pro Forma EBITDA) will assist investors in understanding the effect of certain strategic decisions on the Company's decisions related to its executive pay and compensation structure. The measures of EBITDA as presented by the Company may not be the same as that used by other companies. The Company does not intend for this information to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for other measures prepared in accordance with US GAAP.
|
FY 2014 | FY 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Consolidated Pro Forma EBITDA |
$ | 47.0 | $ | 60.7 | $ | 102.7 | $ | 96.4 | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Pro Forma EBITDAdiscontinued operations |
(1.6 | ) | 0.8 | | | ||||||||
Consolidated Pro Forma EBITDAcontinuing operations |
$ | 48.6 | $ | 59.9 | $ | 102.7 | $ | 96.4 | |||||
Consolidated Pro Forma EBITDAcontinuing operations |
$ |
48.6 |
$ |
59.9 |
$ |
102.7 |
$ |
96.4 |
|||||
Restructuring |
| | 0.5 | 4.5 | |||||||||
Depreciation & Amortization |
33.8 | 35.2 | 53.2 | 57.5 | |||||||||
Impairment |
0.5 | | 12.6 | | |||||||||
Interest |
0.6 | 1.0 | 36.5 | 9.6 | |||||||||
Other, net |
(0.1 | ) | 0.5 | 5.5 | (0.7 | ) | |||||||
Tax |
5.5 | 7.6 | (3.7 | ) | 6.8 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss)continuing operations |
$ | 8.3 | $ | 15.6 | $ | (1.9 | ) | $ | 18.7 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Pro Forma EBITDAdiscontinued operations |
$ | (1.6 | ) | $ | 0.8 | | | ||||||
Depreciation & Amortization |
3.0 | | | | |||||||||
Impairment |
0.5 | | | | |||||||||
Tax |
(2.0 | ) | 0.3 | | | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) incomediscontinued operations (before gain on sale) |
$ | (3.1 | ) | $ | 0.5 | | | ||||||
Gain on sale of Nichols (net of tax) |
24.0 | | | | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net incomediscontinued operations |
$ | 20.9 | $ | 0.5 | | | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss)as reported |
$ | 29.2 | $ | 16.1 | $ | (1.9 | ) | $ | 18.7 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of Free Cash Flow to Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Free Cash Flow (defined as cash provided by operations less capital expenditures) is a non-GAAP financial measure that Quanex's management uses to measure its operational and cash management performance, and to assist with financial decision making. The Company believes this non-GAAP
A-1
measure will assist investors in understanding our financial and cash management performance. The measure of Free Cash Flow as presented by the Company may not be the same as that used by other companies. The Company does not intend for this information to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for other measures prepared in accordance with US GAAP.
|
FY 2014 | FY 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Free Cash Flow |
$ | (13.0 | ) | $ | 37.1 | $ | 49.2 | $ | 44.0 | ||||
Capital Expenditures |
33.8 | 30.0 | 37.2 | 34.6 | |||||||||
Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
$ | 20.8 | $ | 67.1 | $ | 86.4 | $ | 78.6 |
A-2
Shareowner Services P.O. Box 64945 St. Paul, MN 55164-0945 Vote by Internet, Telephone or Mail 24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week Your phone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card. Q INTERNET/MOBILE www.proxypush.com/nx Use the Internet to vote your proxy until 11:59 p.m. (CT) on February 28, 2018. if PHONE 1-866-883-3382 Use a touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy until 11:59 p.m. (CT) on February 28, 2018. MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and [8) return it in the postage-paid envelope provided. If you vote your proxy by Internet or by Telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your Proxy Card. The Board of Directors recommends a for vote for Items 1, 2 and 3. To elect four directors to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2019: 1. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 01 Robert R. Buck 03 Joseph D. Rupp 02 Susan F. Davis 04 Curtis M. Stevens 2. To approve an advisory resolution approving the compensation of the Companys named executive officers; To approve a resolution ratifying the appointment of the Companys independent auditor for fiscal 2018; and Abstain Abstain For Against 3. For Against 4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof. Information with respect to the above matters is set forth in the Proxy Statement that accompanies this Proxy Card. THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED AS THE BOARD RECOMMENDS. Address Change? Mark box, sign, and indicate changes below: Date Signature(s) in Box Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on Proxy. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the Proxy.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Quanex Building Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), will be held at the principal executive offices of the Company, 1800 West Loop South, Suite 1500, Houston, Texas, on March 1, 2018, at 8:00 a.m., C.S.T. Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials: You can access and review the Annual Report and Proxy Statement on the Internet by going to the following Quanex Building Products Corporation website: www.quanex.com/2017AR Quanex Building Products Corporation 1800 West Loop South, Suite 1500 Houston, TX 77027 proxy This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting on March 1, 2018. The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on January 10, 2018, as the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. A complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be maintained at the Companys principal executive offices, will be open to the examination of any stockholder for any purpose germane to the meeting during ordinary business hours for a period of ten days prior to the meeting, and will be made available at the time and place of the meeting during the whole time thereof. By signing the proxy, you revoke all prior proxies and appoint Bill Griffiths and LeRoy Nosbaum, and each of them with full power of substitution, to vote your shares on the matters shown on the reverse side and any other matters which may come before the Annual Meeting and all adjournments. Please execute your vote promptly. Your designation of a proxy is revocable and will not affect your right to vote in person if you find it convenient to attend the meeting and wish to vote in person. The Companys Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017, accompanies this Proxy Card. See reverse for voting instructions.