def14a_051012.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________________
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A – 101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (AMENDMENT NO. __)
Filed by the Registrant [x]
Filed by a party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary proxy statement.
[ ] Confidential, for use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)).
[X] Definitive proxy statement.
[ ] Definitive additional materials.
[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to §240.14a-12.
CAPSTONE THERAPEUTICS CORP.
|
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
|
|
Payment of filing fee (check the appropriate box):
|
[ ]
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
_______________________________________________________________________________________
|
2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
_______________________________________________________________________________________
|
3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
_______________________________________________________________________________________
|
4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
_______________________________________________________________________________________
|
5)
|
Total fee paid:
_______________________________________________________________________________________
|
[ ]
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
[ ]
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
|
1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
_______________________________________________________________________________________
|
2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
_______________________________________________________________________________________
|
3)
|
Filing Party:
_______________________________________________________________________________________
|
4)
|
Date Filed:
_______________________________________________________________________________________
|
Capstone Therapeutics Corp.
(formerly OrthoLogic Corp.)
1275 West Washington Street, Suite 101
Tempe, Arizona 85281
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held Friday, June 15, 2012
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Capstone Therapeutics Corp., a Delaware corporation, formerly OrthoLogic Corp., (the “Company”), will be held on Friday, June 15, 2012 at 1:00 p.m. (local time) at the offices of the Company, 1275 West Washington Street, Suite 101, Tempe, AZ 85281, for the following purposes:
(1) To elect one director as a Class III director to serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in the year 2015 or until a successor is elected;
(2) To ratify the appointment of Moss Adams LLP, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012, and
(3) To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any
adjournment thereof.
The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice.
Stockholders of record at the close of business on May 1, 2012 are entitled to vote at the meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Shares can be voted at the meeting only if the holder is present or represented by proxy. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be open for inspection at the Company’s corporate headquarters for any purpose germane to the meeting during ordinary business hours for 10 days prior to the meeting.
A copy of the Company’s 2011 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes certified financial statements, is enclosed. All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person.
|
By order of the Board of Directors,
|
|
|
|
John M. Holliman, III
Executive Chairman
|
Tempe, Arizona
May 10, 2012
IMPORTANT: It is important that your stockholdings be represented at this meeting. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, please complete, date and sign the enclosed Proxy and mail it promptly in the enclosed envelope to assure representation of your shares. No postage need be affixed if mailed in the United States.
|
Capstone Therapeutics Corp.
PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held Monday, June 15, 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(formerly OrthoLogic Corp.)
1275 West Washington Street, Suite 101
Tempe, Arizona 85281
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held Friday, June 15, 2012
Proxies in the accompanying form are solicited on behalf, and at the direction, of the Board of Directors of Capstone Therapeutics Corp., formerly OrthoLogic Corp. (the “Company”) for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Friday, June 15, 2012, at 1:00 p.m., local time, or any adjournment thereof (the “Annual Meeting”) at the offices of the Company, 1275 West Washington Street, Suite 101, Tempe, AZ 85281. All shares represented by properly executed proxies, unless such proxies have previously been revoked, will be voted in accordance with the direction on the proxies. If no direction is indicated, the shares will be voted in favor of the proposal to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting described in this Proxy Statement. The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) is not aware of any other matter which may come before the meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the meeting for action, including a question of adjourning the meeting from time to time, the persons named in the proxies and acting thereunder will have discretion to vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.
When stock is in the name of more than one person, the proxy is valid if signed by any of such persons unless the Company receives written notice to the contrary. If the stockholder is a corporation, the proxy should be signed in the name of such corporation by an executive or other authorized officer. If signed as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, guardian or in any other representative capacity, the signer’s full title should be given and, if not previously furnished, a certificate or other evidence of appointment should be furnished.
This Proxy Statement and the Form of Proxy which is enclosed are being mailed to the Company’s stockholders commencing on or about May 10, 2012. The Proxy Statement and Form of Proxy, as well as the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K are available on the Company’s website, www.capstonethx.com.
A stockholder executing and returning a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time before it is voted. A stockholder who wishes to revoke a proxy can do so by executing a later-dated proxy relating to the same shares and delivering it to the Secretary of the Company prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting, by written notice of revocation received by the Secretary prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting or by appearing in person at the Annual Meeting, filing a written notice of revocation and voting in person the shares to which the proxy relates.
In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited by personal conversations or by telephone, telex, facsimile or telegram by the directors, officers and regular employees of the Company. Such persons will receive no additional compensation for such services. Arrangements will also be made with certain brokerage firms and certain other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for the forwarding of solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of Common Stock held of record by such persons, and such brokers, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries will be reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection therewith. The mailing address of the principal executive offices of the Company is 1275 West Washington Street, Suite 101, Tempe, Arizona 85281.
VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on May 1, 2012 (the “Record Date”) will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were issued and outstanding 40,885,411 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Each holder of Common Stock is entitled to one vote, exercisable in person or by proxy, for each share of the Company’s Common Stock held of record on the Record Date.
VOTING PROCEDURES
The presence of a majority of the shares of Common Stock entitled to vote, in person or by proxy, is required to constitute a quorum for the conduct of business at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are each included in the determination of the number of shares present for quorum purposes. The Inspector of Election appointed by the Chairman of the Board of Directors shall determine the shares represented at the meeting and the validity of proxies and ballots and shall count all proxies and ballots. The one nominee for director receiving the highest number of affirmative votes (whether or not a majority) cast by the shares represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon, a quorum being present, shall be elected as a director. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be taken into account in determining the outcome of the election.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company’s Common Stock at May 1, 2012 with respect to (i) each person known to the Company to own beneficially more than five percent of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock, (ii) each director of the Company, (iii) each of the named executive officers and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. At May 1, 2012 there were 40,885,411 shares of the Company’s Common Stock outstanding.
|
Common Stock
|
|
Beneficially Owned (1)
|
Beneficial Owner
|
Number
|
|
Percent of Class
|
Fredric J. Feldman (2)
|
380,564
|
|
*
|
John M. Holliman, III (3)
|
992,272
|
|
2.4
|
Elwood D. Howse, Jr. (4)
|
402,703
|
|
*
|
Randolph C. Steer (5)
|
520,298
|
|
1.3
|
Les M. Taeger (6)
|
461,988
|
|
1.1
|
Dana B. Shinbaum (7)
|
393,774
|
|
*
|
BVF Group (8)
|
7,755,688
|
|
19.0
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (9)
|
3,151,599
|
|
7.3
|
____________________________________
|
(1)
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. In accordance with SEC rules, shares, which may be acquired upon exercise of stock options which are currently exercisable or which become exercisable within 60 days of the date of the table, are deemed beneficially owned by the optionee. Except as indicated by footnote, and subject to community property laws where applicable, the persons or entities named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes 180,000 shares Dr. Feldman has a right to acquire upon exercise of stock options. Voting and investment power shared with spouse.
|
|
(3)
|
Includes 655,000 shares Mr. Holliman has a right to acquire upon exercise of stock options, 3,000 shares indirectly owned as trustee and 1,658 shares indirectly owned as trustee of Valley Ventures III, LP.
|
|
(4)
|
Includes 180,000 shares Mr. Howse has a right to acquire upon exercise of stock options.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes 475,000 shares Dr. Steer has a right to acquire upon exercise of stock options.
|
|
(6)
|
Includes 417,414 shares Mr. Taeger has a right to acquire upon exercise of stock options.
|
|
(7)
|
Includes 349,963 shares Mr. Shinbaum has a right to acquire upon exercise of stock options.
|
|
(8)
|
BVF Group (Biotechnology Value Fund, L.P., Biotechnology Value Fund II, L.P. BVF Investments,L.L.C., Investment 10, L.L.C., BVF Partners, L.P., BVF Inc.) is not a related party or otherwise affiliated with the Company, its directors or officers, and the principal business office of the Reporting Persons comprising the Group is located at 900 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 1100, Chicago, IL 60611.
|
|
(9)
|
Includes 2,257,377 shares directors and executive officers have a right to acquire upon exercise ofstock options.
|
The address of each of the listed stockholders, unless noted otherwise, is in care of Capstone Therapeutics Corp., 1275 West Washington Street, Suite 101, Tempe, AZ 85281.
One director is to be elected at the Annual Meeting to serve as a Class III director until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in the year 2015 or until a successor is elected. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the Proxies received by them FOR the Company’s nominee, Elwood D. Howse, Jr. Mr. Howse is currently a director of the Company. The nominee for director receiving the highest number of affirmative votes (whether or not a majority) cast by the shares represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon, a quorum being present, shall be elected as a director. Only affirmative votes are relevant in the election of directors.
Pursuant to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, the Board of Directors is classified into three classes, with each class holding office for a three-year period. The Certificate of Incorporation restricts the removal of directors under certain circumstances. The number of directors may be increased to a maximum of nine. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders do not have the right to cumulate their votes in the election of directors. If any nominee of the Company is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who shall be designated by the present Board of Directors to fill the vacancy. It is not expected that any nominee will be unable or will decline to serve as a director.
The name of the nominee for director and of the directors, whose terms continue beyond the Annual Meeting, and certain information about them, are set forth below.
INFORMATION CONCERNING DIRECTORS
Nominee for Class III Director Whose Term Will Expire at the 2015 Annual Meeting
Elwood D. Howse (1) (2) (3) |
Director since 1987 |
Elwood D. Howse, Jr., 72, has served as a director of the Company since September 1987. In 1982, Mr. Howse founded Cable, Howse and Ragen, investment banking and stock brokerage firm, and in 1977, Mr. Howse co-founded Cable & Howse Ventures, an early stage venture capital firm focused on technology. In 1976, he served as Vice President, Corporate Finance, for Foster & Marshall, a northwest stock brokerage firm. In 1974 he was the Chief Financial Officer of Seattle Stevedore Company and the Miller Produce Company. Mr. Howse has served as a corporate director and advisor to various public, private and non-profit enterprises. He served on the board of the National Venture Capital Association and is past President of the Stanford Business School Alumni Association. He currently serves on the boards of directors of BSQUARE Corporation (BSQR), Formotus, Inc., BeneSol Corporation and not-for-profits, Junior Achievement Worldwide and Junior Achievement of Washington. Mr. Howse holds a BS in Engineering from Stanford University and an MBA from Stanford Graduate School of Business.
The Board believes Mr. Howse’s education and experience, particularly Mr. Howse’s financial experience, which qualifies him to be designated as our financial expert on our Audit Committee, brings important financial and business experience to the board and qualifies him to serve on our board.
Class I Director Whose Term Will Expire at the 2013 Annual Meeting
Fredric J. Feldman, Ph.D. (1) (2) (3) |
Director since 1991 |
Fredric J. Feldman, Ph.D., 70, has been the President of FJF Associates, a consultant to health care venture capital and emerging companies, since February 1992. From September 1995 to June 1996, he was the Chief Executive Officer of Biex, Inc., a women’s healthcare company. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Oncogenetics, Inc., a cancer genetics reference laboratory, from 1992 to 1995. Between 1988 and 1992, Dr. Feldman was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Microgenics Corporation, a medical diagnostics company.
Dr. Feldman received his Ph.D. in analytical chemistry from the University of Maryland. He has been a director of a number of public and private companies involved in the healthcare industry. The Board believes that Dr. Feldman’s over forty years of operating, scientific and business experience in the medical/biotech industry qualifies him for service on our board.
Class II Director Whose Term Will Expire at the 2014 Annual Meeting
John M. Holliman, III |
Director since 1987 |
John M. Holliman III, 58, has served as Executive Chairman and Principal Executive Officer of the Company since April 2006 and has served as a director of the Company since September 1987 and as Chairman of the Board of Directors since August 1997. Since February 1993 he has been a general partner of entities which are the general partners of Valley Ventures, LP (formerly known as Arizona Growth Partners, LP), Valley Ventures II, LP, Valley Ventures III, LP, Valley Ventures III Annex, LP, all of which are venture capital funds that invest principally in life science companies.
John M. Holliman, III has over thirty years of business experience, including service on the boards of over forty companies, commercial lending experience with a major financial institution, and has been active in venture capital financing for over twenty years, concentrating in the medical/biotech industries. Mr. Holliman earned a BBA in Finance and a MBA from Southern Methodist University and a Master of International Management from the Thunderbird School of Global Management. During his career Mr. Holliman has gained substantial executive and board level experience in business, finance and operations. The Board believes the experience and knowledge of Mr. Holliman qualifies him to serve on our board.
******
(1)
|
Member of the Audit Committee.
|
(2)
|
Member of the Compensation Committee.
|
(3)
|
Member of the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee
|
Board Meetings and Committees
On January 17, 2012, our Board of Directors (the “Board”) voted to reduce the size of our Board from six members to three members. Concurrent with this action, Robert J. Spiegel, MD, William M. Wardell, MD, Ph.D. and Augustus A. White III, MD, Ph.D. resigned from the Board.
The Board of Directors is composed of three directors, including two outside directors. The Board has determined that each director other than Mr. Holliman is independent for purposes of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2). The Board of Directors held a total of ten meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. No director attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board of Directors and any committee on which such director served during the period of such service. Currently, the Board of Directors does not have a policy regarding director attendance at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. All of the directors, except Dr. White, attended last year’s annual meeting of stockholders in person.
Independent directors regularly meet in executive sessions without the Executive Chairman or other members of management, to review the criteria upon which the performance of the Executive Chairman is based, the performance of the Executive Chairman against those criteria, to ratify the compensation of the Executive Chairman as approved by the Compensation Committee, and to discuss other relevant matters.
The Board presently has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee, which is a separately-designated standing committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), met five times in 2011 and consisted of Mr. Howse (Chairman), Dr. White and Dr. Spiegel. Effective January 17, 2012, Dr. Feldman joined the Committee and Dr. White and Dr. Spiegel resigned from the Committee. The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of financial reporting practices, including the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence, and the performance of the Company’s internal audit function. The Audit Committee appoints the Company’s independent auditor. The Audit Committee meets independently with representatives of the Company’s independent auditor and with representatives of senior management. The Committee reviews the general scope of the Company’s annual audit, the fee charged by the independent auditor and other matters relating to internal control systems. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for approving, reviewing and monitoring the performance of non-audit services by the Company’s auditor. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter that has been adopted by the Board of Directors, a copy of which is available on the Company’s website at www.capstonethx.com.
The Board of Directors has determined that the composition of the Audit Committee, the attributes of its members and the responsibilities of the Audit Committee, as reflected in its charter, are in accordance with applicable Nasdaq Marketplace Rules for audit committees. In particular, all Audit Committee members possess the required level of financial literacy, at least one member of the Audit Committee meets the current standard of requisite financial management expertise and the Board of Directors has determined that Elwood D. Howse, Jr., the Chairman of the Audit Committee, is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Additionally, all members of the Audit Committee are “independent directors” as defined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2).
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee consisted of Dr. Feldman (Chairman), Mr. Howse and Dr. Spiegel in 2011. Effective January 17, 2012, Dr. Spiegel resigned from the Committee. The Committee met one time during 2011. Each member of the Compensation Committee is an “independent director” as defined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) and is an “outside director” as defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Compensation Committee reviews salaries and benefit programs designed for senior management, officers and directors and administers certain grants under the Company’s stock option plans with a view to ensure that the Company is attracting and retaining highly qualified managers through competitive salary and benefit programs and encouraging extraordinary effort through incentive rewards. The Compensation Committee does not have a written charter.
Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee
The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee examines and recommends nominations for the Board of Directors and officers of the Company. The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which is posted on our website at www.capstonethx.com. The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee has not established a formal policy on Board diversity (differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skills, race, gender, national origin, and other qualities and attributes that contribute to board heterogeneity), or minimum standards for Board nominees. However, the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee has developed the following outline of core Board skills as a framework for the nominee evaluation process and considers diversity to strengthen the Board where overlapping skills are present.
§
|
Operations Experience / Knowledge
|
o
|
Pharmaceutical Development
|
- Basic Research
- IND Process
- Clinical Trial Process
- NDA Process
§
|
Scientific Experience / Knowledge
|
o
|
Understanding of basic scientific principles in indications under development by the Company
|
§
|
Financial Experience / Knowledge
|
o
|
GAAP / Disclosure Controls / SEC Reporting
|
o
|
Business Transactions and Strategies
|
§
|
Business Experience / Knowledge
|
o
|
Organization Management / Corporate Governance
|
o
|
Product Market Analysis / Strategy
|
Accordingly, the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee generally seeks candidates with chief operating, executive or financial officer experience in complex Biotech/Pharmaceutical organizations; a commitment to give the time and attention to the duties required of them; and evidence of an independent and inquiring mind willing to question management’s assumptions. When a new director is needed, the Committee seeks recommendations from current directors, officers and business associates.
The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee in 2011 consisted of Dr. White (Chairman) and Dr. Wardell. Mr. Howse temporarily joined the Committee for its February 21, 2011 meeting to enable Dr. White to excuse himself from the Committee meeting during its vote on his nomination for election as a Class II director at the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders. Effective January 17, 2012, Dr. Feldman (Chairman) and Mr. Howse joined the Committee and Dr. White and Dr. Wardell resigned from the Committee. Each member of the Committee is an “independent director” as defined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605 (a)(2). The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee met one time during 2011.
Stockholder Nomination of Director Candidates
The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee will consider for nomination as a director of the Company any director candidate recommended or nominated by stockholders in accordance with the process outlined below. Director candidates recommended or nominated by stockholders are not evaluated differently from recommendations or nominations from other sources.
Stockholders wishing to recommend candidates for consideration by the Corporate Governance/ Nominating Committee may do so by providing the candidate’s name, contact details, biographical data, and qualifications in writing to the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee, c/o Secretary, Capstone Therapeutics Corp., 1275 West Washington Street, Suite 101, Tempe, Arizona 85281. The Board may change the process for the means by which stockholders may recommend director candidates to the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee. Please refer to the Company’s website at www.capstonethx.com and the Company’s SEC filings for any changes to this process.
Any stockholder entitled to vote for the election of directors at a meeting may nominate persons for election as directors only if written notice of such stockholder’s intent to make such nomination is given, either by personal delivery at 1275 West Washington Street, Suite 101, Tempe, Arizona or by United States mail, postage prepaid to Secretary, Capstone Therapeutics Corp., 1275 West Washington Street, Suite 101, Tempe, Arizona 85281, not later than: (i) with respect to the election to be held at an annual meeting of stockholders, 20 days in advance of such meeting; and (ii) with respect to any election to be held at a special meeting of stockholders for the election of directors, the close of business on the fifteenth (15th) day following the date on which notice of such meeting is first given to stockholders. Each such notice must set forth: (a) the name and address of the stockholder who intends to make the nomination and of the person or persons to be nominated; (b) a representation that such stockholder is a holder of record of stock of the corporation entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice; (c) a description of all arrangements or understandings between such stockholder and each nominee and any other person or persons
(naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by such stockholder; (d) such other information regarding each nominee proposed by such stockholder as would have been required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the SEC if such nominee had been nominated, or intended to be nominated, by the Board of Directors; and (e) the consent of each nominee to serve as a director of the Company if elected. The chairman of the stockholders’ meeting may refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure.
Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight
The Company believes that the value to an organization of a separation of the duties of the Chairman of the Board and Principal Executive Officer depends largely on the operating characteristics and organizational structure of the Company.
Currently, the Company’s operations are focused on pre-clinical studies and small early stage clinical trials. We have no products close to market and, accordingly, no product marketing, sales or manufacturing activities. We are a small organization of currently three full-time employees.
The Board believes the Company is at a stage where the Board can effectively perform its oversight responsibilities, including its responsibilities to oversee risk, without a separation of the Chairman and Principal Executive Officer position and that its leadership structure is currently the most efficient way to conduct its business. The Board administers these oversight responsibilities through review and approval of short and long term strategic plans, annual budgets, annual Company goals and objectives, executive management’s compensation structure, and all transactions, contracts or agreements that could have, in the Board’s opinion, a material effect on the Company. Additionally, the Board’s Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the Company’s financial reporting process as outlined in this Proxy Statement and the Audit Committee’s Charter.
The Company has a lead independent director (Elwood D. Howse, Jr.), who sets the agenda and leads the periodic meetings of non-executive independent directors. Under leadership of the lead independent director, the non-executive independent directors privately review and approve the Executive Chairman’s annual goals and objectives and related compensation structure, as well as address any other business matters on which a director believes private discussion is required.
Stockholder Communications with Board
Stockholders wishing to communicate with the Board of Directors or with a Board member should address communications to the Board or to the particular Board member, c/o Secretary, Capstone Therapeutics Corp., 1275 West Washington Street, Suite 101, Tempe, Arizona 85281. All communications sent in this manner to the Board members will be forwarded directly to the Board. From time to time, the Board may change the process for the means by which stockholders may communicate with the Board or its members. Please refer to the Company’s website at www.capstonethx.com for any changes to this process.
The following table sets forth compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the Company’s directors during the year ended December 31, 2011. Mr. John Holliman, III is not included in this table and his compensation as a director is included in the Summary Compensation Table in the Executive Compensation section in this Proxy Statement.
Name
|
Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($) (1)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
|
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
Fredric J. Feldman, Ph.D.
Director
|
64,000
|
-
|
3,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
67,000
|
Elwood D. Howse, Jr.
Director
|
64,000
|
-
|
3,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
67,000
|
Robert J. Spiegel, MD
Director
|
64,000
|
-
|
3,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
67,000
|
William M. Wardell, MD, Ph.D.
Director
|
64,000
|
-
|
3,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
67,000
|
Augustus A. White, III,
MD, Ph.D.
Director
|
62,500
|
-
|
3,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
65,500
|
(1) Fair value of the grants at the date of the grants was determined using the Black-Scholes model as described in Note 5 to the Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2012.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company paid directors an annual retainer of $24,000, payable quarterly in advance, $2,500 for each board meeting attended in person and $1,000 for each board meeting attended by telephone. All directors are eligible for a grant of nonqualified stock options pursuant to the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. On June 10, 2005, the Board of Directors approved an annual award to each director of a non-qualified stock option to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The Company granted to each director non-qualified options to acquire 10,000 shares at a price of $0.58 per share on January 1, 2011 (fair value of $3,000). These options vested immediately and were granted at the closing market price on the date of grant. All options have been granted with ten-year terms.
On June 10, 2005 the Board of Directors also approved an annual award to each director of $25,000 of restricted stock. The shares granted vest one year from the date of issuance. On January 1, 2011 the Board paid each director $25,000 in lieu of the annual stock award.
Director Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
Name
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Unearned
Options (#)
|
Options
Exercise
Price
($)
|
Option
Expiration Date
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
John M. Holliman, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
1.75
|
5/12/2016
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
1.02
|
2/21/2018
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
0.45
|
2/3/2019
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
0.82
|
2/4/2020
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
0.70
|
10/30/2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Spiegel, MD
|
50,000
|
|
|
0.82
|
5/21/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William M. Wardell, MD, Ph.D.
|
10,000
|
|
|
5.33
|
2/11/2016
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
0.82
|
5/21/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) (2) (3) (5)
|
10,000
|
|
|
3.61
|
12/31/2012
|
(1) (2) (3) (5)
|
10,000
|
|
|
6.13
|
12/31/2013
|
(1) (2) (3) (5)
|
30,000
|
|
|
7.40
|
1/23/2014
|
(1) (2) (3) (5)
|
10,000
|
|
|
6.25
|
12/31/2014
|
(1) (2) (3) (5)
|
10,000
|
|
|
4.90
|
1/2/2016
|
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
|
25,000
|
|
|
1.75
|
5/12/2016
|
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
|
10,000
|
|
|
1.43
|
1/1/2017
|
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
|
10,000
|
|
|
1.35
|
1/1/2018
|
(1) (3) (4) (5) *
|
19,792
|
5,208
|
|
0.70
|
10/30/2018
|
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
|
10,000
|
|
|
0.42
|
1/1/2019
|
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
|
10,000
|
|
|
0.72
|
1/1/2020
|
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)
|
10,000
|
|
|
0.58
|
1/1/2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feldman, Fred (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holliman, John (2)
|
* Vest monthly over a four-year period ending 10/30/2012
|
|
Howse, Elwood (3)
|
All other directors options were fully vested on 12/31/2011
|
|
Wardell, William (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
White, Augustus (5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spiegel, Robert (6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director/Officer Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
|
Number of Shares
or Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested (#)
|
Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested ($)
|
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested (#)
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)
|
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
(i)
|
(j)
|
|
|
|
|
|
John M. Holliman, III
|
50,000
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 17, 2011, Mr. Holliman was awarded 50,000 shares of restricted stock which fully vested on January 17, 2012.
The employment of Mr. Holliman, Dr. Steer and Mr. Shinbaum was terminated effective October 31, 2011. They continue to perform certain of their previous duties and responsibilities under consulting agreements.
The following table sets forth information regarding our executive officers:
Name
|
Age
|
Title
|
John M. Holliman, III
|
58
|
Executive Chairman and Principal Executive Officer
|
Randolph C. Steer, MD, Ph.D.
|
62
|
President
|
Les M. Taeger
|
61
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
|
Dana B. Shinbaum
|
49
|
Vice President, Business Development
|
John M. Holliman, III, became Executive Chairman and Principal Executive Officer of the Company on April 5, 2006 and has served as a director of the Company since September 1987 and as Chairman of the Board of Directors since August 1997. Since February 1993 he has been a general partner of entities, which are the general partners of Valley Ventures, LP (formerly known as Arizona Growth Partners, LP), Valley Ventures II, LP, Valley Ventures III Annex, LP, all of which are venture capital funds that invest principally in life science companies.
Randolph C. Steer, MD, Ph.D. became President of the Company on April 5, 2006. Dr. Steer has been an independent pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical devices consultant since 1989, and has provided consulting services to the Company since 2002. He has a broad scientific, medical and business background, including extensive experience in pre-clinical, clinical and regulatory affairs, having held key management positions in leading corporations and having served as an advisor to many companies in the United States and abroad. Dr. Steer has also advised numerous venture capital firms, investment banks and independent investors on the commercial development of drugs, biologics, diagnostics and medical devices. He has served as Associate Director of Medical Affairs at Marion Laboratories; Medical Director at Ciba Consumer Pharmaceuticals (Ciba-Geigy Corporation);
Vice President, Senior Vice President and Member of the Executive Committee at Physicians World Communications Group; Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Advanced Therapeutics Communications International, a global drug regulatory group, and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Vicus.com, Inc. He is a member of the Board of Directors of Techne Corporation, and was a member of the Board of Directors of BioCryst Pharmaceuticals from 1994 to 2009. Dr. Steer received his MD degree from the Mayo Medical School and his Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota, where he also completed a residency and subspecialty fellowship in clinical and chemical pathology. He is a Fellow of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
Les M. Taeger joined the Company as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on January 16, 2006. Mr. Taeger most recently served as Chief Financial Officer of CardioTech International, Inc. (“CardioTech”). CardioTech is a publicly-traded, medical device company that developed, manufactured and sold advanced products for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. From September 2000 to February 2004, when Mr. Taeger became Chief Financial Officer of CardioTech, Mr. Taeger served as Chief Financial Officer of Gish Biomedical, Inc. (“Gish”). Gish, which became a subsidiary of CardioTech pursuant to a merger transaction involving the companies in April 2003, specializes in the manufacture and sale of products used in open-heart surgery, vascular access and orthopedic surgery. Prior to his employment with CardioTech and Gish, Mr. Taeger was employed for over five years as Chief Financial Officer of Cartwright Electronics, Inc., a division of Meggitt, PLC. Mr. Taeger is a Certified Public Accountant, with a Bachelor’s degree in accounting.
Dana B. Shinbaum joined the Company as Vice President of Business Development in October 2005. Previously he served as Vice President, Product Planning and Market Analytics at Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and has over twenty years of experience in the pharmaceutical/biotechnology industry. While at Savient his responsibilities included creating and developing new business opportunities, leading global project teams and managing product launches. He played key strategic planning roles in Savient’s acquisition of Rosemont Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and the divestiture of Bio-Technology General Ltd., Savient’s global biologics business. Prior to joining Savient, Mr. Shinbaum was at Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, where he held market planning and marketing roles of increasing responsibility, including Product Manager for the PREMARIN® franchise. Mr. Shinbaum received a Master of Business Administration, summa cum laude, from Drexel University in Philadelphia and a Bachelor of Arts degree from Lafayette College in Easton, Pennsylvania.
Compensation Philosophy
The objectives of the Company’s executive compensation policies are to attract, retain and reward executive officers who contribute to the Company’s success, to align the financial interests of executive officers with the performance of the Company, to strengthen the relationship between executive pay and shareholder value, to motivate executive officers to achieve the Company’s business objectives and to reward individual performance. Prior to October 13, 2011, the Company used base salary, cash bonuses, stock awards and stock options to achieve these objectives.
Review of Current Compensation Components of Executive Chairman and other Executive Officers
The Compensation Committee reviews all components of the Executive Chairman’s and other executive officers’ compensation, including salary, bonus, stock awards, accumulated vested and unvested stock options, the dollar value to the executive and cost to the company of all perquisites and other personal benefits, as well as the actual projected payout obligations under several potential severance and change-in-control scenarios and any limitations on the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of all compensation. The Compensation Committee considers the following:
Each executive has individual performance goals for the fiscal year. The Compensation Committee reviews the performance goals and expectations for individual executive positions. Based on recommendations from the Executive Chairman and the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the performance achievement of
these goals, the Compensation Committee determines the resulting changes to compensation components for the executive officers. The Executive Chairman also recommends individual performance objectives for himself for each fiscal year. The Compensation Committee approves the performance objectives of the Executive Chairman and evaluates the Executive Chairman’s performance measured against these objectives and evaluates and formulates any potential changes in compensation accordingly.
The Company’s performance is compared against the goals for the fiscal year. Strategic, high level performance expectations are identified each fiscal year for the Company. The Executive Chairman provides documentation to the Compensation Committee regarding the expectations and corresponding results of operations.
The level of compensation for executives in similar positions for companies of similar size and development structure is considered in determining executive compensation. To enable the Company to continue to attract and retain executives in the competitive marketplace, executive compensation for similar companies is reviewed. The Company typically obtains this data through a review of publicly available executive compensation information for comparable public companies.
The Compensation Committee’s Conclusion
Based on the review detailed above, the Compensation Committee, at its meeting held at the beginning of the fiscal year, formulates its recommendations regarding what areas of the compensation components will be adjusted for the upcoming year and what the performance bonus for the prior year will be.
Board Approval
At the first Compensation Committee meeting of the year, the Compensation Committee reviews the Executive Chairman and other executive officers’ compensation and bonuses and presents its recommendations to the Board of Directors. The final total compensation package decision regarding the Executive Chairman is made by the Independent Directors in an Executive Session without the Executive Chairman or other members of management present, and the final decisions on other executives’ total compensation packages are made by the full Board of Directors.
The following discussion is provided to facilitate stockholder understanding of the named executive officer compensation information included in this Proxy Statement. Overall our compensation decisions are framed by the nature of our business as a development stage pharmaceutical company with the need for highly specialized and talented individuals. Our compensation policies are designed to take into account the fact that the competition for executives is with all sizes of pharmaceutical and biotech firms and must factor in not just comparable compensation, including health care, retirement or other traditional executive benefits, but issues such as location and position stability. We operate in Tempe, Arizona, a relatively small market for biotechnology, and in a field with substantial product development risks, with no current revenue and limited funds.
Annual Base Compensation and Cash Bonus
As previously mentioned, each executive officer receives a base salary and a cash bonus which is based on performance against both Company and individual performance goals. We have established base salaries which we believe are comparable to other biotechnology firms and with the potential cash bonus, provide for a reasonable level of cash-based compensation to the executives. Base compensation in 2011 ranged from $325,000 for Dr. Steer, to $200,000 for Mr. Holliman. Executive officers did not receive an increase in base pay in 2011. No executive salary increases are planned for 2012. In 2011 the bonus potential was 40% of base salary for Mr. Holliman, Dr. Steer, Mr. Taeger and Mr. Shinbaum. The bonus plan placed 25-30% of the executive’s cash compensation at risk, which we believe is a reasonable level of risk for cash-based compensation. In 2011, performance for the bonus plan was weighted 70% towards Company goals and 30% towards individual goals. Company and individual goals included a combination of operating, such as timely completion of clinical or pre-clinical tasks and performance against our strategic plan, financial, such as performance to budget or generation of unbudgeted cost savings, and administrative, such as maintaining compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules, regulations and reporting requirements. We believe that the cash compensation at risk and the performance goals of the 2011 bonus plan serve to align our executives’ interests with our interests and focus their efforts where we believe they have the potential to achieve performance we have identified as important to accomplishing objectives necessary to advance our development efforts.
Interim Change in Officer Compensation
On October 13, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) adopted a plan to preserve cash during ongoing partnering efforts. Included in the actions taken was the termination of the employment of John M. Holliman, III, Executive Chairman, Randolph C. Steer, MD, Ph.D., President and Dana B. Shinbaum, Vice President, Business Development. Each of these individuals continued in their prior roles as consultants, rather than as employees, at consulting rates which would equate to approximately $100,000 per year for Mr. Holliman and $120,000 per year for Dr. Steer and Mr. Shinbaum. Effective April 1, 2012, Mr. Shinbaum is consulting on an as needed, hourly rate, basis. As employees, their base compensation had been $200,000 for Mr. Holliman, $325,000 for Dr. Steer and $242,000 for Mr. Shinbaum. Les M. Taeger, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President will continue as an employee, but his base compensation has been reduced from $242,000 per year to $120,000 per year. All of these officers had also been eligible for an annual bonus based on individual and Company performance goals of up to 40% of their base compensation. The Board’s actions included cancellation of the Company’s bonus plan. The vested outstanding stock options held by each executive will continue to be exercisable while such executive is serving as a consultant to the Company.
The above changes in employment and compensation trigger severance clauses in the executives’ employment agreements that entitle each executive to a payment equal to one year of base salary.
Equity Based Compensation
As previously discussed, we provide a certain level of cash compensation to each executive as both a short-term reward and to focus executive performance on short-term goals that are part of our long-term strategies. Additionally, we use a combination of stock option grants and common stock awards, both during the employment offer process and annually, to generate a commitment to and a long-term investment in our Company. Grants and awards connected with employment offers were determined based on the position and competitive factors at the time of the offers. Grants and awards are targeted such that an annual $1 increase in market price, currently an annual $41,000,000 increase in shareholder value, would provide approximately 10% to 20% of the executive’s compensation. We believe grants at these levels serve to gradually increase our executives’ commitment to the Company and align their interests with other stockholders of the Company.
Stock Option Grants
On January 17, 2011, the Company granted options to employees to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with the exercise price determined by the closing market price on the date of grant ($0.67). This grant included grants to the named executives (Steer 50,000 shares, Taeger 25,000 shares and Shinbaum 25,000 shares).
Common Stock Awards
We believe common stock awards can be an important element in our compensation plan. On January 17, 2011, Mr. Holliman was awarded 50,000 shares of restricted stock with a fair value of $34,000 on the date of award.
Fringe Benefits, Perquisites and Retirement Benefits.
Our executives participate in group health, dental, life, and disability programs and participate in our 401(k) plan on the same basis as other employees. No perquisites are provided to executives that in aggregate exceed $10,000 per year.
The following table sets forth, with respect to the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and each of the two most highly compensated executive officers other than the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, who were serving as executive officers at the end of the last completed fiscal year (the “named executive officers”).
Name
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compen-
sation
($)
|
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
(i)
|
(j)
|
John M. Holliman, III
Executive Chairman
(Principal
Executive
Officer)
|
2011
2010
2009
|
179,000 (1)
200,000
200,000
|
-
-
-
|
19,000(3)
-
-
|
3,000
50,000(1)
42,000(1)
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
|
264,000(1)(2)
64,000(1)
62,000(1)
|
465,000
314,000
304,000
|
Randolph C. Steer, MD, Ph.D.
former President
|
2011
2010
2009
|
276,000
325,000
325,000
|
-
88,000
75,000
|
-
-
-
|
19,000
23,000
18,000
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
-
|
325,000 (2)
-
-
|
620,000
436,000
418,000
|
Les M. Taeger
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
2011
2010
2009
|
237,000
242,000
242,000
|
-
68,000
56,000
|
-
-
-
|
10,000
16,000
12,000
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
|
242,000 (2)
-
-
|
489,000
326,000
310,000
|
Dana B. Shinbaum former
VP Business Development
|
2011
2010
2009
|
232,000
242,000
242,000
|
-
68,000
51,000
|
-
-
-
|
10,000
16,000
12,000
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
|
242,000 (2)
-
-
|
484,000
326,000
305,000
|
1.
|
Mr. Holliman is a member of the Board of Directors and as a director, received compensation of $64,000, $64,000 and $62,000, in cash, in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and an annual grant of an option to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Mr. Holliman received total director’s compensation (Board fees, stock awards and option grants) of $67,000, $68,000 and $74,000 in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as more fully described in the Compensation of Directors section of this Proxy Statement. Fair value of the grants at the date of the grants was determined using the Black-Scholes model as described, for 2011, in Note 5 to the Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2012; for 2010, in Note 5 to our Annual Report on form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2011, and for 2009, in Note 6 to the Annual Report on form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2010.
|
2.
|
On October 31, 2011, the employment of Mr. Holliman, Dr. Steer and Mr. Shinbaum was terminated and Mr. Taeger’s salary was reduced from $242,000 per year to $120,000. These actions triggered severance clauses in their employment agreements requiring the payment of severance of one year’s base salary to each executive officer. For a description of the employment agreements with our named executive offers, please see “Employment Contract, Termination of Employment, and Change-in-Control Arrangements” below.
|
3.
|
On January 17, 2011, Mr. Holliman was awarded 50,000 shares of restricted stock which fully vested on January 17, 2012.
|
The following table sets forth information about stock option grants and stock awards during the last completed fiscal year to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table.
Grants of Plan-based Awards
Name
|
Grant
Date
|
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
|
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
|
Exercise or
Base Price
of Option
Awards
($/Share)
|
Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock
and Option
Awards (1)
($)
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(i)
|
(j)
|
(k)
|
(l)
|
John M. Holliman, III
Executive Chairman
|
1/1/11
1/17/11
|
-
50,000
|
10,000
|
0.58
|
3,000
19,000
|
Randolph C. Steer, MD, Ph.D.
President
|
1/17/11
|
-
|
50,000
|
0.67
|
19,000
|
Les M. Taeger
Chief Financial Officer
|
1/17/11
|
-
|
25,000
|
0.67
|
10,000
|
Dana B. Shinbaum
VP Business Development
|
1/17/11
|
-
|
25,000
|
0.67
|
10 ,000
|
Fair value of the grants at the date of the grants was determined using the Black-Scholes model as described in Note 5 to the Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2012.
Name
|
Option Awards
|
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
|
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
|
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
John M. Holliman, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
-
|
3.61
|
12/31/2012
|
|
10,000
|
-
|
6.13
|
12/31/2013
|
|
30,000
|
-
|
7.40
|
1/23/2014
|
|
10,000
|
-
|
6.25
|
12/31/2014
|
|
10,000
|
-
|
4.90
|
1/2/2016
|
|
25,000
|
-
|
1.75
|
5/12/2016
|
|
200,000
|
-
|
1.75
|
5/12/2016
|
|
10,000
|
-
|
1.43
|
12/31/2017
|
|
10,000
|
-
|
1.35
|
12/31/2018
|
|
50,000
|
-
|
1.02
|
2/21/2018
|
|
25,000
|
-
|
0.70
|
10/30/2018
|
|
10,000
|
-
|
0.42
|
1/1/2019
|
|
125,000
|
-
|
0.45
|
2/3/2019
|
|
10,000
|
-
|
0.72
|
1/1/2020
|
|
100,000
|
|
0.82
|
2/4/2020
|
|
10,000
|
-
|
0.58
|
1/1/2021
|
Randolph C. Steer, MD, Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
-
|
1.75
|
5/12/2016
|
|
50,000
|
-
|
1.53
|
5/21/2017
|
|
50,000
|
-
|
1.02
|
2/21/2018
|
|
75,000
|
-
|
0.45
|
2/3/2019
|
|
50,000
|
-
|
0.82
|
2/4/2020
|
|
50,000
|
-
|
0.67
|
1/17/2021
|
Les M. Taeger
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
-
|
5.15
|
1/16/2016
|
|
150,000
|
-
|
1.70
|
6/2/2016
|
***
|
14,093
|
613
|
1.02
|
2/21/2018
|
|
50,000
|
-
|
0.45
|
2/3/2019
|
**
|
32,083
|
2,917
|
0.82
|
2/4/2020
|
**
|
11,458
|
13,542
|
0.67
|
1/17/2021
|
Dana B. Shinbaum
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
-
|
3.27
|
10/29/2015
|
|
35,000
|
-
|
5.39
|
1/30/2016
|
|
150,000
|
-
|
1.70
|
6/2/2016
|
***
|
11,745
|
500
|
1.02
|
2/21/2018
|
|
50,000
|
-
|
0.45
|
2/3/2019
|
**
|
32,083
|
2,917
|
0.82
|
2/4/2020
|
**
|
11,458
|
13,542
|
0.67
|
1/17/2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
** Vesting over two years monthly
|
|
|
|
|
*** Vesting over four years monthly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS, TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT, AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
Effective April 5, 2006, Mr. John M. Holliman, III, became Executive Chairman and Principal Executive Officer. On May 12, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement to compensate Mr. Holliman for his services as the Company’s Executive Chairman and principal executive officer (the “Holliman Agreement”).
Under the Holliman Agreement, Mr. Holliman’s services to the Company may be terminated by the Company at any time, with or without cause. In the event of termination without cause under the Holliman Agreement, Mr. Holliman will receive severance equal to twelve months of his current monthly base compensation. The Holliman Agreement provides for annual base cash compensation of $200,000, payable in accordance with the Company’s standard payroll practices and a target bonus of 40% of base compensation upon the achievement of individual and corporate performance objectives. In addition, the Holliman Agreement included other terms and conditions consistent with agreements entered into with other Company executives.
Effective October 31, 2011, the employment of Mr. Holliman was terminated which resulted in the acceleration of the vesting of the options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock held by Mr. Holliman, so that his options became exercisable, and payment of his severance benefit. Subsequent to October 31, 2011, Mr. Holliman will continue his role as Executive Chairman under a consulting agreement, which provides for compensation at an annual rate of $100,000. Mr. Holliman did not receive a bonus for 2011 performance as the Company’s bonus plan was terminated in October 2011.
Effective April 5, 2006, Randolph C. Steer, MD, Ph.D., became President of the Company. Dr. Steer has performed consulting services for the Company since 2002. On May 12, 2006, the Company also entered into an agreement with Randolph C. Steer, MD, Ph.D., to compensate Dr. Steer for his services as the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer (the “Steer Agreement”). Under the Steer Agreement, Dr. Steer’s services to the Company may be terminated by the Company at any time, with or without cause. If the event of termination is without cause, under the Steer Agreement, Dr. Steer will receive severance equal to twelve months of his current monthly base compensation. Dr. Steer’s annual base cash compensation is $325,000, payable in accordance with the Company’s standard payroll practices. Dr. Steer is also eligible for a target bonus of 40% of base compensation upon the achievement of individual and corporate performance objectives. In addition, the Steer Agreement includes other terms and conditions consistent with agreements entered into with other Company executives.
Effective October 31, 2011, the employment of Dr. Steer was terminated which resulted in the acceleration of the vesting of the options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock held by Dr. Steer, so that his options became exercisable, and payment of his severance benefits. Subsequent to October 31, 2011, Dr. Steer will continue his role as President under a consulting agreement, which provides for compensation at an annual rate of $120,000. Dr. Steer did not receive a bonus for 2011 performance as the Company’s bonus plan was terminated in October 2011
On January 10, 2006, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Les M. Taeger, dated as of January 10, 2006, effective as of January 16, 2006 (the “Taeger Employment Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Taeger serves as the Company’s Senior Vice President / Chief Financial Officer. Under the Taeger Employment Agreement, Mr. Taeger may be terminated at any time, with or without cause, at the option of either the Company or Mr. Taeger. If the Company terminates Mr. Taeger without cause, provided Mr. Taeger first executes a Severance Agreement in the form then used by the Company, the Company shall pay to Mr. Taeger twelve months of his current monthly base compensation in effect at the time of termination. Should such termination occur as a result of a Change in Control, the Company shall also pay Mr. Taeger a pro-rata share of his bonus at the time of termination. Mr. Taeger’s annual base salary is $242,000. Mr. Taeger is eligible to participate in the Company’s discretionary bonus program, which provides for a bonus of up to 40% of his base salary, and Mr. Taeger will receive medical, dental and other fringe benefits generally granted to the Company’s senior management.
Effective October 31, 2011, Mr. Taeger’s annual base salary was reduced to $120,000 and the Company’s bonus plan was terminated. Mr. Taeger did not receive a bonus for 2011 performance. The salary reduction triggered payment of his severance benefit.
On October 17, 2005, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Dana B. Shinbaum (the “Shinbaum Employment Agreement”), pursuant to which Mr. Shinbaum serves as the Company’s Vice President of Business Development and Strategic Marketing. Under the Shinbaum Employment Agreement, Mr. Shinbaum may be terminated at any time, with or without cause, at the option of either the Company or Mr. Shinbaum. If the Company terminates Mr. Shinbaum without cause, provided Mr. Shinbaum first executes a Severance Agreement in the form then used by the Company, the Company shall pay to Mr. Shinbaum twelve months of his current monthly base compensation in effect at the time of termination for a period of one year following the date of termination, at the time and in the manner dictated by the Company’s standard payroll policies. Should such termination occur as a result of a Change in Control, the Company shall also pay Mr. Shinbaum a pro-rata share of his bonus at the time of termination. Mr. Shinbaum’s annual base salary is $242,000. Mr. Shinbaum is eligible to participate in the Company’s discretionary bonus program, which provides for a bonus of up to 40% of his base salary, and Mr. Shinbaum will receive medical, dental and other fringe benefits generally granted to the Company’s senior management.
Effective October 31, 2011, the employment of Mr. Shinbaum was terminated resulting in payment of his severance benefit. Subsequent to October 31, 2011, Mr. Shinbaum continued his role as Vice President of Business Development under a consulting agreement, which provided for compensation at an annual rate of $120,000 through March 31, 2012. Effective April 1, 2012. Mr. Shinbaum is consulting on an as needed, hourly rate, basis. Mr. Shinbaum did not receive a bonus for 2011 performance as the Company’s bonus plan was terminated in October 2011.
Under the Company’s stock option plans, upon the occurrence of a merger in which the Company is not the surviving entity, a sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company, an acquisition by a third party of 100% of the Company’s outstanding equity securities or a similar reorganization of the Company, 75% of all unvested options will vest, with the balance vesting equally over 12 months or according to the individual’s vesting schedule, whichever is earlier. If the option holder loses his position with the Company as a result of the merger or sale, 100% of his options will immediately vest. Additionally, the Company’s 1997 Stock Option Plan and 2005 Equity Incentive Plan provide that, upon a merger, consolidation or reorganization with another corporation in which the Company is not the surviving corporation, outstanding options shall be substituted on an equitable basis for options for appropriate shares of the surviving corporation, or optionees shall receive cash in exchange for cancellation of outstanding options.
At December 31, 2011, unvested options held by named executive officers had no intrinsic value and accordingly, accelerated vesting clauses if triggered at December 31, 2011, would have provided no additional compensation to the named executive officers.
On October 31, 2011, the stock options held by Mr. Holliman and Dr. Steer subject to accelerated vesting and had no intrinsic value.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The role of the Audit Committee (the “Audit Committee”) is to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight of the Company’s financial reporting process. Management of the Company is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s accounting and financial reporting principles and internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The Company’s independent registered public accountant is responsible for auditing the Company’s financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Among other matters, the Audit Committee monitors and oversees the activities and performance of the external independent registered public accountant, including the audit scope, external audit fees, and auditor independence matters. The Audit Committee also is responsible for approving non-audit services proposed to be performed by the independent auditor. The Audit Committee has responsibility to appoint and dismiss the Company’s independent auditor. Management and independent auditor presentations to and discussions with the Audit Committee also cover various topics and events that may have significant financial impact or are the subject of discussions between management and the independent auditor.
In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and the independent registered public accountant. The Audit Committee has also discussed with the independent registered public accountant the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional standards, Vol. 1, AU Section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in rule 3200T. Finally, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accountant required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public accountant the independent registered public accountant’s independence. The Audit Committee met five times in 2010, each time meeting separately with the independent registered public accountant without the presence of management.
Based upon the above review and discussions described in this report, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Audit Committee during 2011:
Elwood D. Howse, Jr. (Chairman)
Augustus A. White, III, MD, Ph.D. (resigned from the Committee on January 17, 2012)
Robert J. Spiegel. MD (resigned from the Committee on January 17, 2012)
(Fredric J. Feldman, Ph.D. joined the Committee on January 17, 2012)
The foregoing report of the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors shall not be deemed soliciting material or otherwise deemed filed and shall not be subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or deemed to be incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any other filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate the Report by reference therein.
CODE OF ETHICS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
In March 2004, the Company adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of its employees and has particular sections that apply only to its principal executive officer and senior financial officers. The Company has posted the text of its code of ethics on its website (www.capstonethx.com), under the “Investors” section under the link “Corporate Governance” and “Code of Ethics.” In addition, the Company will promptly disclose on its website (1) the nature of any amendment to its code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer and senior financial officers, and (2) the nature of any waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of its code of ethics that is granted to one of these specified officers, the name of such officer who is granted the waiver and the date of the waiver.
The full Board of Directors addresses all matters regarding corporate governance (that is, the relationships of the Board, the stockholders and management in determining the direction and performance of the Company) and the procedural rules regarding the operation of the Board itself. As such, the Board reviews all proposals submitted by stockholders for action at the annual stockholders’ meeting with regards to each such proposal.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Board of Directors reviews transactions with related parties, but has no formal policies in place with respect to such reviews or the approval of such transactions. During 2011 there were no reported related party transactions with directors, executive officers or other related parties, which might have required disclosure under SEC rules or which were otherwise material to the Company.
The Company has entered into indemnity agreements with all of its directors and officers for the indemnification of and advancing of expenses to such persons to the fullest extent permitted by law.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Under the securities laws of the United States, the Company’s directors, its executive officers and any persons holding more than 10% of the Company’s Common Stock are required to report their initial ownership of the Company’s Common Stock and any subsequent changes in that ownership to the SEC. Specific due dates for these reports have been established, and the Company is required to disclose any failure to file by these dates. The Company believes that all of these filing requirements were satisfied during the year ended December 31, 2011.
In making these disclosures, the Company has relied solely on written representations of those persons it knows to be subject to the reporting requirements and copies of the reports that they have filed with the SEC.
A list of directors, executive officers and persons holding more than 10% of the Company’s Common Stock is included in the section “Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof” under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in this Proxy Statement.
The following provides tabular disclosure of the number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, the weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, and the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2011, aggregated into two categories - plans that have been approved by stockholders and plans that have not. See Note 5 to the financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2012, for additional information on our equity compensation plans.
|
Number of securities to
|
Weighted average
|
Number of securities remaining
|
|
be issued upon exercise
|
exercise price of
|
available for future issuance
|
|
of outstanding options,
|
outstanding options,
|
under equity compensation plans
|
|
warrants and rights
|
warrants and rights
|
(excluding securities reflected in
|
|
|
|
column (a))
|
Plan Category:
|
(c)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
approved by Security Holders
|
3,372,501
|
$2.08
|
258,024
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
not approved by Security Holders
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Total
|
3,372,501
|
$2.08
|
258,024
|
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM – MOSS ADAMS LLP
The Board of Directors is submitting the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2012, for stockholder ratification at the 2012 Annual Meeting and recommends that stockholders vote FOR ratification of such appointment.
In the event the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will consider it a direction to consider other accounting firms for the subsequent year. Moss Adams LLP representatives are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF MOSS ADAMS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE 2012 FISCAL YEAR.
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 by our principal accounting firms Moss Adams LLP and Ernst and Young LLP.
Type of Fee
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees (1)
|
|
$ |
59,000 |
|
|
$ |
177,000 |
|
Audit-Related Fees (2)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total Audit and Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
59,000 |
|
|
|
177,000 |
|
Tax Fees (3)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
All Other Fees (4)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total Fees
|
|
$ |
59,000 |
|
|
$ |
177,000 |
|
(1)
|
Audit fees include fees for services rendered in connection with the audits of the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q during the applicable fiscal year.
|
(2)
|
Audit-related fees would include fees for services rendered for matters such as a business combination, sales of shares of the Company’s common stock, and responses to accounting and reporting-related matters.
|
(3)
|
Tax fees would include fees for services rendered for tax compliance, preparation of original and amended tax returns, claims for refunds and other tax services.
|
(4)
|
Our principal accounting firms did not perform nor bill the Company for any other services during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 that are appropriately classified as “All Other Fees.”
|
The Audit Committee has concluded that the services provided by the principal accounting firms that were not related to the audit of the Company’s financial statements were at all times compatible with maintaining that firm’s independence.
Consistent with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding auditor independence, the Audit Committee has responsibility for appointing, setting compensation for, and overseeing the work of, the independent auditor. In recognition of this responsibility, the Audit Committee has included in its charter the responsibility to pre-approve “all auditing services and permitted non-auditing services proposed to be performed by the independent auditor, subject to the de minimis exceptions for non-audit services that were not recognized as non-audit services at the time of engagement and which are subsequently approved by the committee prior to completion of the audit.” No fees were paid to the independent auditor pursuant to the “de minimis” exception to the foregoing pre-approval policy in 2011.
The Company knows of no other matters to be submitted at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter properly comes before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed proxy card to vote the shares they represent as the Board of Directors may recommend.
Proposals of stockholders of the Company which are intended to be presented by such stockholders at the Company’s Annual Meeting for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 must be received by the Company no later than February 15, 2013 in order that they may be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting. Additionally, if a stockholder wishes to present to the Company an item for consideration as an agenda item for a meeting without inclusion in the proxy statement, he, she or it must timely give notice to the Secretary and give a brief description of the business desired to be discussed. To be timely for next year’s Annual Meeting, our bylaws require that such notice must have been delivered to or mailed to and received by the Company between 60 and 90 days prior to that Annual Meeting. If we do not publicly announce our meeting date or give notice of our meeting date at least 70 days before next year’s Annual Meeting, stockholders
may submit items for consideration as agenda items until 5:00 pm on the 15th day after the public disclosure or notice.
A copy of the Company’s 2011 Annual Report to Stockholders is enclosed. The Annual Report to Stockholders is not a part of the proxy soliciting material enclosed herewith. The Proxy Statement and Form of Proxy, as well as the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, are available on the Company’s website www.capstonethx.com. Upon the written request of any stockholder entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, the Company will furnish, without charge, a copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of exhibits to the Annual Report on Form 10-K are also available upon specific request and payment of 25 cents per page for reproduction plus $3.00 for postage and handling. All requests should be directed to the Secretary of the Company at 1275 West Washington Street, Suite 101, Tempe, Arizona 85281.
We have adopted the “householding” procedure approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission that allows the Company to deliver one Proxy Statement and Annual Report to a household of stockholders instead of delivering a set of documents to each stockholder in the household. This procedure is more cost effective because it reduces the number of materials to be printed and mailed. If they have elected, stockholders who share the same last name and address will receive one Proxy Statement and Annual Report per address unless the Company receives, or has previously received, contrary instructions. Stockholders will continue to receive separate proxy cards/voting instruction forms to vote their shares.
If you would like to receive a separate copy of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report for this year, please write or call the Company at the following address or telephone number: Capstone Therapeutics Corp. , Corporate Secretary, 1275 West Washington Street, Suite 101, Tempe, Arizona 85281; (800) 937-5520. Upon receipt of your request, the Company will promptly deliver the requested materials to you.
If you and other Capstone stockholders of record with whom you share an address currently receive multiple sets of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report, and you would like to receive only a single copy of each in the future, or if you and other Capstone stockholders of record with whom you share an address currently receive a single copy of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report, and you would like to receive a separate copy of each in the future, please contact our distribution agent, Broadridge, by calling (800) 542-1061 or writing to Broadridge, Attention Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. If you hold your shares in street name (that is, through a bank, brokerage account or other record holder), please contact your bank, broker or the other record holder to request information about householding.
May 10, 2012
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
CAPSTONE THERAPEUTICS CORP.
PROXY
2012 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints John M. Holliman, III and Les M. Taeger, and each or either of them, as Proxies, with full power of substitution, to represent and to vote, as designated below, all shares of Common Stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Capstone Therapeutics Corp. to be held on June 15, 2012, or any adjournment thereof, hereby revoking any proxy previously given.
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSAL NOS. 1 AND 2.
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed on the reverse side.)
|
CAPSTONE THERAPEUTICS CORP.
P.O. BOX 11365
NEW YORK, N.Y. 10203-0365
|
1.
|
PROPOSAL TO ELECT ONE CLASS III DIRECTOR FOR TERM EXPIRING IN YEAR 2015
|
FOR the nominee listed below [ ]
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for the nominee listed below [ ]
Nominee: Elwood D. Howse, Jr.
2.
|
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF MOSS ADAMS LLP, AS THE COMPANY’SINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2012
|
|
FOR [ ]
|
AGAINST [ ]
|
ABSTAIN [ ]
|
3.
|
In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof as set forth in the Notice and Proxy Statement relating to this meeting, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged.
|
Change of Address and/or
Comments Mark Here [ ]
|
Please sign exactly as name appears to the left. Where shares are held by more than one owner, all should sign. When signing as an attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, partnership, limited liability entity, or any other entity, please sign in the name of the entity by the president or other authorized officer.
|
|
Dated: _______________________________, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Votes must be indicated in Black or Blue ink.
Please sign, date and return this proxy in the enclosed postage prepaid envelope. The Proxy Statement and Form of Proxy, as well as the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K are available on the Company’s website www.capstonethx.com.