UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JULY 25, 2009. |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
Commission File No. 0-20572
PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota | 41-0886515 | |
(State of incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1031 Mendota Heights Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55120
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(651) 686-1600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer | x | Accelerated Filer | ¨ | |||
Non-Accelerated Filer | ¨ | Smaller Reporting Company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No ¨
Patterson Companies, Inc. had outstanding 122,316,585 shares of common stock as of September 1, 2009.
INDEX
Safe Harbor Statement Under The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Of 1995:
This Form 10-Q for the period ended July 25, 2009, contains certain forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, expect, anticipate, estimate, believe, goal, or continue, or comparable terminology that involves risks and uncertainties that are qualified in their entirety by cautionary language set forth herein under the caption Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results, in the Companys 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed June 24, 2009 and other documents previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
July 25, 2009 |
April 25, 2009 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 175,377 | $ | 158,065 | ||||
Receivables, net |
484,128 | 476,156 | ||||||
Inventory |
299,481 | 269,934 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
40,823 | 33,440 | ||||||
Total current assets |
999,809 | 937,595 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
170,863 | 166,500 | ||||||
Long-term receivables, net |
57,587 | 51,572 | ||||||
Goodwill |
781,058 | 747,104 | ||||||
Identifiable intangibles, net |
219,889 | 220,932 | ||||||
Other |
19,360 | 9,917 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,248,566 | $ | 2,133,620 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 199,381 | $ | 180,933 | ||||
Accrued payroll expense |
34,495 | 45,105 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
95,545 | 84,855 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
20,034 | 1,407 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
14,000 | 22,000 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
363,455 | 334,300 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
525,000 | 525,000 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
100,352 | 88,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
988,807 | 947,300 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Common stock |
$ | 1,223 | $ | 1,220 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital |
25,772 | 20,320 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
14,060 | (8,867 | ) | |||||
Retained earnings |
1,338,666 | 1,293,609 | ||||||
Notes receivable from ESOP |
(119,962 | ) | (119,962 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,259,759 | 1,186,320 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 2,248,566 | $ | 2,133,620 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
July 25, 2009 |
July 26, 2008 |
|||||||
Net sales |
$ | 789,579 | $ | 743,859 | ||||
Cost of sales |
530,895 | 492,129 | ||||||
Gross profit |
258,684 | 251,730 | ||||||
Operating expenses |
181,894 | 172,136 | ||||||
Operating income |
76,790 | 79,594 | ||||||
Other income and (expense): |
||||||||
Interest income |
2,460 | 1,922 | ||||||
Interest expense |
(6,619 | ) | (8,052 | ) | ||||
Other (loss) gain |
(199 | ) | 218 | |||||
Income before taxes |
72,432 | 73,682 | ||||||
Income taxes |
27,375 | 27,718 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 45,057 | $ | 45,964 | ||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.38 | $ | 0.39 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.38 | $ | 0.39 | ||||
Weighted average common shares: |
||||||||
Basic |
118,119 | 117,890 | ||||||
Diluted |
118,643 | 118,712 | ||||||
See accompanying notes.
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
July 25, 2009 |
July 26, 2008 |
|||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 45,057 | $ | 45,964 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
5,754 | 4,965 | ||||||
Amortization |
3,103 | 1,418 | ||||||
Share-based compensation |
2,230 | 1,962 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
(105 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||
Bad debt expense |
992 | 538 | ||||||
Change in assets and liabilities, net of acquired |
(10,195 | ) | (22,201 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
46,836 | 32,596 | ||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Additions to property and equipment, net |
(8,008 | ) | (11,479 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions, net |
(28,113 | ) | (513 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(36,121 | ) | (11,992 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Payments and retirement of long-term debt and obligations under capital leases |
| (2 | ) | |||||
(Payments on) borrowings from credit facility |
(8,000 | ) | | |||||
Common stock issued, net |
3,120 | 2,359 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
105 | 50 | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(4,775 | ) | 2,407 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
11,372 | (25 | ) | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
17,312 | 22,986 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
158,065 | 308,164 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 175,377 | $ | 331,150 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
5
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
(Unaudited)
July 25, 2009
NOTE 1 GENERAL
Basis of Presentation
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of July 25, 2009 and the results of operations and the cash flows for the periods ended July 25, 2009 and July 26, 2008. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the periods ended July 25, 2009 and July 26, 2008, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on June 24, 2009.
The condensed consolidated financial statements of Patterson Companies, Inc. include the assets and liabilities of PDC Funding Company, LLC (PDC Funding) and PDC Funding Company II, LLC (PDC Funding II), wholly owned subsidiaries and separate legal entities under Minnesota law. PDC Funding and PDC Funding II are fully consolidated special purpose entities of the Company established to sell customer installment sale contracts to outside financial institutions in the normal course of business. The assets of PDC Funding and PDC Funding II would be available first and foremost to satisfy the claims of its creditors. There are no known creditors of PDC Funding or PDC Funding II.
Fiscal Year End
The fiscal year end of the Company is the last Saturday in April. The first quarter of fiscal 2010 and 2009 represent the 13 weeks ended July 25, 2009 and July 26, 2008, respectively.
Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income was $67,984 and $45,648 for the three months ended July 25, 2009 and July 26, 2008, respectively. Other than net income, comprehensive income also includes foreign currency translation adjustments. Foreign currency translation adjustments do not include a provision for income tax because earnings from foreign operations are considered to be indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S. During the three months ended July 25, 2009, comprehensive income was positively affected by approximately $23 million due to the effect of changes in exchange rates on foreign currency translations.
6
Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (shares in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||
July 25, 2009 |
July 26, 2008 | |||
Denominator: |
||||
Denominator for basic earnings per shareweighted-average shares |
118,119 | 117,890 | ||
Effect of dilutive securitiesstock options, restricted stock, and stock purchase plans |
524 | 822 | ||
Denominator for diluted earnings per shareadjusted weighted average shares |
118,643 | 118,712 | ||
Options to purchase 1,368 and 695 shares of common stock during the three months ended July 25, 2009 and July 26, 2008, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. Unvested restricted stock awards excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share were 231 and 0 shares during the three months ended July 25, 2009 and July 26, 2008, respectively, because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
7
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurement (SFAS No. 157). In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position FAS 157-2, which deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 for its financial assets and liabilities at the beginning of fiscal year 2009. Effective at the beginning of fiscal year 2010, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157 for its nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The adoption had no impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)). SFAS No. 141(R) significantly changes the accounting for business combinations in a number of areas including the treatment of contingent consideration, preacquisition contingencies, transaction costs, in-process research and development and restructuring costs. In addition, under SFAS No. 141(R), changes in an acquired entitys deferred tax assets and uncertain tax positions after the measurement period will impact income tax expense. The Company adopted SFAS No. 141(R) effective at the beginning of fiscal 2010. The adoption will have an impact on our consolidated financial statements, but the nature and magnitude of the specific effects are dependent upon the nature, terms and size of the acquisitions consummated after the effective date. In addition, changes that may occur in the income tax liabilities for income tax uncertainty of acquisitions completed prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 141(R) would be recorded as adjustments to income tax expense.
In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165). SFAS No. 165 provides guidance to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 also requires entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events were evaluated as well as the rationale for why that date was selected. The Company adopted SFAS No. 165 in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have any impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Subsequent events have been evaluated through the time of filing of this Form 10-Q on September 3, 2009.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets-an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS No. 166) and Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS No. 167). SFAS No. 166 will require more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where companies have continuing exposure to risks related to transferred financial assets. It eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. SFAS No. 167 changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. Both SFAS No. 166 and SFAS No. 167 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company is evaluating the impact SFAS No. 166 and SFAS No. 167 will have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and establishes only two levels of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), authoritative and nonauthoritative. The FASB
8
Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) will become the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS No. 168 is effective for annual or interim periods ending after September 15, 2009. As SFAS No. 168 is not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it is not expected to impact our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company will adjust historical GAAP references in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to reflect accounting guidance references included in the Codification.
NOTE 2 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The goodwill balances and related activity by business segment as of April 25, 2009 and July 25, 2009 are as follows:
Balance at April 25, 2009 |
Acquisition Activity |
Translation And Other Activity |
Balance at July 25, 2009 | ||||||||||
Dental Supply |
$ | 127,127 | $ | 9,627 | $ | 1,253 | $ | 138,007 | |||||
Rehabilitation Supply |
498,730 | 25,590 | | 524,320 | |||||||||
Veterinary Supply |
121,247 | | (2,516 | ) | 118,731 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 747,104 | 35,217 | (1,263 | ) | $ | 781,058 | ||||||
The increase in the goodwill balance during the three month period ended July 25, 2009 primarily reflects the preliminary purchase price allocations of acquisitions. The purchase price allocations of certain acquisitions are preliminary and are subject to adjustment for changes in the preliminary assumptions pending additional information, including final asset valuations from a third party valuation firm.
9
Balances of other intangible assets excluding goodwill are as follows:
July 25, 2009 |
April 25, 2009 |
|||||||
Unamortized - indefinite lived: |
||||||||
Copyrights, trade names and trademarks |
$ | 77,847 | $ | 77,847 | ||||
Amortized: |
||||||||
Distribution agreement, customer lists and other |
193,199 | 190,975 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated amortization |
(51,157 | ) | (47,890 | ) | ||||
Net amortized other intangiable assets |
142,042 | 143,085 | ||||||
Total identifiable intangible assets, net |
$ | 219,889 | $ | 220,932 | ||||
NOTE 3 DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company is a party to certain offsetting and identical interest rate cap agreements. The cap agreements are not designated for hedge accounting treatment and were entered into to fulfill certain covenants of a sale agreement between a commercial paper conduit managed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and PDC Funding. The cap agreements provide a credit enhancement feature for the financing contracts sold by PDC Funding to the commercial paper conduit, and replace a minimum interest rate margin previously required under the sale agreement.
The cap agreements are cancelled and new agreements entered into periodically to maintain consistency with the dollar maximum of the sale agreements and the maturity of the underlying financing contracts. PDC Funding has purchased two interest rate caps from banks with combined amortizing notional amounts of $367 million and a maturity date of March 2014. Patterson Companies, Inc. has sold two identical interest rate caps to the same banks. Similarly to the above agreements, PDC Funding II and Patterson Companies, Inc. entered into offsetting and identical interest rate swap agreements in fiscal 2008. These agreements have an amortizing notional of $110 million and a maturity date of September 2013.
In addition to the identical purchased and sold interest rate contracts described above, the Company has entered into two interest rate swap agreements with banks to economically hedge the interest rate risk associated with our finance contracts. As of July 25, 2009, the agreements have notional amounts of approximately $28 million and $43 million, respectively, and maturity dates of November 2011 and February 2012, respectively.
None of the Companys interest rate contracts qualify for hedge accounting treatment and, accordingly, the Company records the fair value of the agreements as an asset or liability and the change in any period as income or expense of the period in which the change occurs.
10
The following presents the fair value of the interest rate contracts included in the consolidated balance sheets:
Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value At | Fair Value At | |||||||||||||||
Derivative type |
Location | July 25, 2009 |
April 25, 2009 |
Location | July 25, 2009 |
April 25, 2009 | ||||||||||
Interest rate contracts |
Other noncurrent assets |
$ | 12.6 | $ | 2.6 | Other noncurrent liabilities |
$ | 14.2 | $ | 4.3 |
The following presents the effect of interest rate contracts on the consolidated statements of income:
Derivative type |
Location of gain(loss) recognized on derivative |
Three Months Ended July 25, 2009 |
||||
Interest rate contracts |
Other income(expense), net | $ | (0.4 | ) |
NOTE 4 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 157 at the beginning of fiscal 2009. SFAS 157 establishes the following hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value from market based assumptions to entity specific assumptions as follows:
Level 1 - | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities at the measurement date. | |
Level 2 - | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. | |
Level 3 - | Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data available. These inputs reflect managements assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
The Companys hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 25, 2009 is as follows:
Total | Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash equivalents |
$ | 8.4 | $ | 8.4 | | | ||||||
Derivative instruments |
12.6 | | $ | 12.6 | | |||||||
Total assets |
$ | 21.0 | $ | 8.4 | $ | 12.6 | $ | | ||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Derivative instruments |
$ | 14.2 | $ | | $ | 14.2 | $ | | ||||
11
Cash equivalents The Company values cash equivalents at transaction price. The carrying value of cash equivalents, including government securities and money market funds, approximates fair value. Maturities of cash equivalents are less than three months.
Derivative instruments The Companys derivative instruments consist of interest rate contracts. These instruments are valued using inputs such as interest rates and credit spreads.
NOTE 5 CUSTOMER FINANCING
As a convenience to its customers, the Company offers several different financing alternatives including both a Company sponsored program and a third party program. For the third party program, the Company acts as a facilitator between the customer and the third party financing entity with no on-going involvement in the financing transaction. Under the Company sponsored program, equipment purchases by customers with strong credit are financed to a maximum of $0.4 million for any one customer. The Company generally sells the customers financing contracts to outside financial institutions in the normal course of its business. The Company currently has two arrangements under which it sells these contracts.
In fiscal 2003, the Company initiated an agreement to sell its equipment finance contracts to a commercial paper conduit managed by JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. To participate in the commercial paper conduit, the Company was required to establish a special purpose entity (SPE), PDC Funding Company, LLC, a consolidated, wholly owned subsidiary. The Company transfers financing contracts to the SPE and in turn, the SPE sells the contracts to the commercial paper conduit. The SPE does not issue any debt. While there is no recourse to the Company by the commercial paper conduit on the sale of contracts, the Company receives only 90% of the principal amount of the contracts upon the sale. The remaining 10% of the proceeds is held by the conduit as security against the eventual performance of the portfolio. The holdback receivable from the conduit is recorded as a non-current asset, which is carried at its estimated fair market value. The capacity of this arrangement with the conduit is a maximum of $367 million.
The Company also maintains an agreement with U.S. Bank National Association, as agent, whereby the U.S. Bank group purchases customers financing contracts. The Company has established another SPE, PDC Funding LLC II (PDC II), as a consolidated, wholly owned subsidiary, which sells financing contracts to the U.S. Bank group. The Company receives 94% of the principal amounts of the contracts upon sale with the remaining 6% of the proceeds held by the banks as security against the eventual performance of the portfolio. The holdback receivable from the banks is recorded as a non-current asset, which is carried at its estimated fair market value. The capacity under the agreement is $110 million.
These financing arrangements are accounted for as a sale of assets under the provisions of SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. The Company sold approximately $43.6 million and $42.8 million of its contracts under these arrangements during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company retains servicing responsibilities under both agreements, for which it is paid a servicing fee. The servicing fees received by the Company are considered adequate compensation for services rendered. Accordingly, no servicing asset or liability has been recorded. The agreements require the Company to maintain a minimum current ratio and maximum leverage ratio. The Company was in compliance with the covenants at July 25, 2009.
12
Included in current receivables in the condensed consolidated balance sheets are approximately $149.8 million and $136.1 million as of July 25, 2009 and April 25, 2009, respectively, of finance contracts not yet sold by the Company. A total of $360.9 million of finance contracts receivable sold under the agreements were outstanding at July 25, 2009. The residual receivable under the arrangements was approximately $50.8 million and $45.1 million as of July 25, 2009 and April 25, 2009, respectively. Since the internal financing program began in 1994, bad debt write-offs have amounted to less than one-percent of the loans originated.
NOTE 6 SEGMENT REPORTING
Patterson Companies, Inc. is comprised of three reportable segments: dental, veterinary, and rehabilitation supply. The Companys reportable business segments are strategic business units that offer similar products and services to different customer bases. The dental supply segment provides a virtually complete range of consumable dental products, clinical and laboratory equipment and value-added services to dentists, dental laboratories, institutions and other dental healthcare providers throughout North America. The veterinary supply segment provides consumable supplies, equipment, diagnostic products, biologicals (vaccines) and pharmaceuticals to companion-pet veterinary clinics in the majority of regions throughout the United States. The rehabilitation supply segment provides a comprehensive range of distributed and self-manufactured rehabilitation medical supplies and non-wheelchair assistive products to acute care hospitals, long-term care facilities, rehabilitation clinics, dealers and schools.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies set forth in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Companys 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed June 24, 2009. The Company evaluates segment performance based on operating income. The corporate office general and administrative expenses are included in the dental supply segment and consist of home office support costs in areas such as informational technology, finance, human resources and facilities. The cost to operate the distribution centers are allocated to the operating units based on the through-put of the unit.
13
The following table presents information about the Companys reportable segments:
Three Months Ended | ||||||
July 25, 2009 |
July 26, 2008 | |||||
Net sales |
||||||
Dental supply |
$ | 510,991 | $ | 519,885 | ||
Rehabilitation supply |
109,407 | 100,700 | ||||
Veterinary supply |
169,181 | 123,274 | ||||
Consolidated net sales |
$ | 789,579 | $ | 743,859 | ||
Operating income |
||||||
Dental supply |
$ | 55,983 | $ | 59,624 | ||
Rehabilitation supply |
13,287 | 14,029 | ||||
Veterinary supply |
7,520 | 5,941 | ||||
Consolidated operating income |
$ | 76,790 | $ | 79,594 | ||
The following table presents sales information by product for the Company:
Three Months Ended | ||||||
July 25, 2009 |
July 26, 2008 | |||||
Net Sales |
||||||
Consumable and printed products |
$ | 546,740 | $ | 498,183 | ||
Equipment and software |
177,654 | 181,292 | ||||
Other |
65,185 | 64,384 | ||||
Total |
$ | 789,579 | $ | 743,859 | ||
14
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) should be read in conjunction with the MD&A included in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed June 24, 2009, for important background information regarding, among other things, an overview of the markets in which we operate and our business strategies.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of net sales represented by certain operational data.
Three Months Ended | ||||||
July 25, 2009 |
July 26, 2008 |
|||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||
Cost of sales |
67.2 | % | 66.2 | % | ||
Gross margin |
32.8 | % | 33.8 | % | ||
Operating expenses |
23.0 | % | 23.1 | % | ||
Operating income |
9.7 | % | 10.7 | % | ||
Other (expense) income, net |
(0.6 | )% | (0.8 | )% | ||
Income before taxes |
9.2 | % | 9.9 | % | ||
Net income |
5.7 | % | 6.2 | % | ||
QUARTER ENDED JULY 25, 2009 COMPARED TO QUARTER ENDED JULY 26, 2008.
Net Sales. Consolidated net sales for the three months ended July 25, 2009 (Current Quarter) were $789.6 million, an increase of 6.1% compared to $743.9 million for the three months ended July 26, 2008 (Prior Quarter). The contribution from acquisitions added 7.2% to sales growth, while changes in foreign currency translation rates reduced sales by 1.4%. Current Quarter sales of all three of the Companys business units were negatively affected by the general economic environment.
Dental segment sales declined 1.7% in the Current Quarter to $511.0. The 1.3% negative impact of foreign currency translation was partly offset by a positive contribution from acquisitions of 0.8%. Consumable sales were down 2.2%, including a 1.3% negative impact of foreign currency translations and a contribution from acquisitions of 0.4%. Consumable sales were affected by the deferral of high-level and discretionary services by patients for economic related reasons.
Dental equipment and software sales decreased 1.8% compared to the Prior Quarter. Sales of basic dental equipment such as chairs, units and lights were impacted by the economic recession and declined 16% in the Current Quarter. However, dental practitioners continued to invest in new technology equipment including CEREC dental restorative systems and digital x-ray systems, which had
15
sales growth of 84% and 16%, respectively. The Company believes the recession is causing many dentists to limit their investments to equipment with rapid rates of return, which is characteristic of these technology investments.
Sales of other services and products in the Dental segment rose 1.4% in the Current Quarter.
Veterinary segment sales of $169.2 million were 37.2% higher than $123.3 million in the Prior Quarter due primarily to the October 2008 acquisition of the Columbus Serum Company. Excluding acquisitions, sales grew 7.8%, reflecting higher volumes of veterinary care for companion pets following several quarters of reduced patient activity.
Current Quarter Rehabilitation segment sales rose 8.6%, from $100.7 million to $109.4 million. Acquisitions contributed 12.6% to sales growth and unfavorable changes in foreign currency translation rates reduced Current Quarter sales by 3.4%. The majority of the acquisition contribution came from the April 2009 acquisition of Mobilis Health Care Group in the United Kingdom.
Gross Margins. Consolidated gross margin of 32.8% declined 100 basis points from the Prior Quarter as a result of the relative growth of the Veterinary segment, which generates a lower gross margin than the other two segments. The gross margins of the Dental and Rehabilitation segments were essentially unchanged in the Current Quarter.
Gross margin of the Veterinary segment decreased 120 basis points in the Current Quarter due primarily to the effect of the Columbus Serum acquisition. A portion of the Columbus Serum sales was generated from distributed nutritional products and production animal business, both of which carry a lower gross margin than the Veterinary segments core companion animal business.
Operating Expenses. The consolidated operating expense ratio improved 10 basis points to 23.0% from 23.1% in the Prior Quarter. The Company did gain operating leverage in the Current Quarter due to expense control measures, and the relative growth of the Veterinary segment, which carries a lower level of operating expenses as compared to the other two business units, however, the improvement was offset by expenses related to the integration of several acquisitions. Such integration activities are underway and the impact of the acquisitions on operating expenses is expected to dissipate as we progress through fiscal 2010.
The operating expense ratio of the Dental segment was 50 basis points higher than in the Prior Quarter, reflecting increased fixed costs on a relative basis against lower sales volume and acquisition-related costs. The Veterinary segments operating expense ratio decreased 80 basis points from the Prior Quarter as a result of leverage on higher revenues. Operating expenses as a percent of sales at the Rehabilitation segment were 170 basis points higher than in the Current Quarter due to the cost structure of acquisitions.
Operating Income. Operating income was $76.8 million, or 9.7% of net sales in the Current Quarter. In the Prior Quarter, operating income was $79.6 million, or 10.7% of net sales. As discussed above, the lower operating margin was due mostly to the consolidated gross margin decline of 100 basis points in the Current Quarter.
16
Other (Expense) Income, Net. Net other expense was $4.4 million in the Current Quarter compared to net other expense of $5.9 million in the Prior Quarter. Interest expense was $1.4 million less in the Current Quarter due to the scheduled payment of $130 million of debt in November 2008.
Income Taxes. The effective income tax rate for the Current Quarter was 37.8%. In the Prior Quarter, the rate was 37.6%. This change is predominately due to the change in the mix of income in the jurisdictions where the Company operates.
Earnings Per Share. Earnings per share was $0.38 in the Current Quarter compared to $0.39 in the Prior Quarter.
17
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
During the Current Quarter, the Company generated $46.8 million of cash flow from operating activities, compared to $32.6 million in the Prior Quarter. The increase in operating cash flows in the Current Quarter is due mostly to an increase in accounts payable, resulting from routine timing of purchases and payments. In the second half of fiscal 2009, the Company invested in a financing program to support marketing efforts directed at the CEREC product line. This promotion, which ended at the close of fiscal 2009, generated approximately $98 million of finance contracts that the Company could not immediately sell to our funding sources due to certain requirements in those funding arrangements. The Company expects to fully liquidate these contracts in fiscal 2010, resulting in an incremental $98 million of cash flow in the year. The majority of these contracts are expected to be liquidated in the second half of fiscal 2010.
Net cash used in investing activities in the Current Period was $36.1 million compared to $12.0 million in the Prior Period. Current Period activity is primarily related to acquisitions for which cash used was $28.1 million, including Empi Therapy Solutions, a rehabilitation equipment and supply distributor, and Global Medical and Dental, a dental equipment and supply distributor. Current Period capital expenditures of $8.0 million include a project to expand an existing distribution facility in Florida. The Company expects fiscal 2010 capital expenditures to approximate $25 million.
Net cash used in financing activities was $4.8 million in the Current Period compared to $2.4 million of net cash provided by financing activities in the Prior Period. The difference between periods is mostly due to the repayment of $8 million on a revolving credit facility in the Current Period. Funds provided by financing activities are generally from the proceeds on the sale shares of Company stock under various employee based programs. With respect to the $300 million revolving credit facility, which is available until November 2012, the Company has an outstanding balance of $14 million and an additional $286 million of available funding as of July 25, 2009.
During the Current Period, foreign currencies of the Companys Canadian and overseas operations strengthened against the U.S. Dollar. The effect of these exchange rate changes on cash was to increase cash balances by $11.4 million in the Current Period.
The Company expects funds generated by operations, existing cash balances and availability under existing debt facilities will be sufficient to meet the Companys working capital needs and finance anticipated expansion plans and strategic initiatives over the next twelve months.
18
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
There have been no material changes in the Companys Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates, as disclosed in its 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed June 24, 2009.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurement (SFAS No. 157). In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position FAS 157-2, which deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 for its financial assets and liabilities at the beginning of fiscal year 2009. Effective at the beginning of fiscal year 2010, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157 for its nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The adoption had no impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141(R)). SFAS No. 141(R) significantly changes the accounting for business combinations in a number of areas including the treatment of contingent consideration, preacquisition contingencies, transaction costs, in-process research and development and restructuring costs. In addition, under SFAS No. 141(R), changes in an acquired entitys deferred tax assets and uncertain tax positions after the measurement period will impact income tax expense. The Company adopted SFAS No. 141(R) effective at the beginning of fiscal 2010. The adoption will have an impact on our consolidated financial statements, but the nature and magnitude of the specific effects are dependent upon the nature, terms and size of the acquisitions consummated after the effective date. In addition, changes that may occur in the income tax liabilities for income tax uncertainty of acquisitions completed prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 141(R) would be recorded as adjustments to income tax expense.
In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165). SFAS No. 165 provides guidance to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 also requires entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events were evaluated as well as the rationale for why that date was selected. The Company adopted SFAS No. 165 in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have any impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Subsequent events have been evaluated through the time of filing of this Form 10-Q on September 3, 2009.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets-an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS No. 166) and Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS No. 167). SFAS No. 166 will require more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and where companies have continuing exposure to risks related to transferred financial assets. It eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. SFAS No. 167 changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. Both SFAS No. 166 and SFAS No. 167 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company is evaluating the impact SFAS No. 166 and SFAS No. 167 will have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
19
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and establishes only two levels of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), authoritative and nonauthoritative. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) will become the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS No. 168 is effective for annual or interim periods ending after September 15, 2009. As SFAS No. 168 is not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it is not expected to impact our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company will adjust historical GAAP references in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to reflect accounting guidance references included in the Codification.
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS
Certain information of a non-historical nature contains forward-looking statements. Words such as believes, expects, plans, estimates, intends and variations of such words are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guaranties of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties or assumptions that are difficult to predict; therefore, the Company cautions shareholders and prospective investors that the following important factors, among others, could cause the Companys actual operating results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The statements under this caption are intended to serve as cautionary statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The following information is not intended to limit in any way the characterization of other statements or information under other captions as cautionary statements for such purpose. The order in which such factors appear below should not be construed to indicate their relative importance or priority. The Company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
| Economic conditions and volatility in the financial markets could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. |
| The Companys ability to meet increased competition from national, regional and local full-service distributors and mail-order distributors of dental, veterinary and rehabilitation and assistive living products, while maintaining current or improved profit margins. |
| The ability of the Company to effectuate modifications to the business models of its three operating units to address changes in the individual markets of those business units. |
| The ability of the Company to consolidate the distribution, information systems, human resources, financial and other administrative functions of its three business units into jointly shared services which meet the needs of the individual business units. |
| The ability of the Company to manage rapidly changing energy and commodity prices. |
| The ability of the Company to retain its base of customers and to increase its market share. |
20
| The ability of the Company to provide for an orderly management succession, including the ability to recruit skilled personnel for the business, and then identify and train our personnel for their transition into key roles to support the long-term growth of the business. |
| The ability of the Company to maintain satisfactory relationships with qualified and motivated sales personnel. |
| The continued ability of the Company to maintain satisfactory relationships with key vendors and the ability of the Company to create relationships with additional manufacturers of quality, innovative products. |
| Changes in the economics of dentistry affecting dental practice growth and the demand for dental products, including the ability and willingness of dentists to invest in high-technology diagnostic and therapeutic products. |
| Reduced growth in expenditures for dental services by private dental insurance plans. |
| The accuracy of the Companys assumptions concerning future per capita expenditures for dental services, including assumptions as to population growth and the demand for preventive dental services such as periodontic, endodontic and orthodontic procedures. |
| The rate of growth in demand for infection control products currently used for prevention of the spread of communicable diseases such as AIDS, hepatitis and herpes. |
| Changes in the economics of the veterinary supply market, including reduced growth in per capita expenditures for veterinary services and reduced growth in the number of households owning pets. |
| The effects of healthcare related legislation and regulation, which may affect expenditures or reimbursements for rehabilitation and assistive products. |
21
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
There have been no material changes since April 25, 2009 in the Companys market risk. For further information on market risk, refer to Item 7A in the Companys 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed June 24, 2009.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and its Chief Financial Officer (CFO), management evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of July 25, 2009. Based upon their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the CEO and CFO concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of July 25, 2009.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended July 25, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
22
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
(c) In September 2004, the Companys Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program under which the Company could have repurchased up to six million shares of common stock. In December 2007, the Companys Board of Directors expanded this authorization to allow for the purchase of up to twenty five million shares of common stock. As of July 25, 2009, 5,905,430 shares remain available for purchase under the authorization, which expires on December 31, 2012.
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
The exhibits listed in the accompanying exhibit index are filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
All other items under Part II have been omitted because they are inapplicable or the answers are negative, or were previously reported in the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed June 24, 2009.
23
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC. | ||||||
(Registrant) | ||||||
Dated: September 3, 2009 | ||||||
By: | /s/ R. Stephen Armstrong | |||||
R. Stephen Armstrong | ||||||
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
24
Exhibit |
Exhibit Description | |
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32 | Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
25