We have provided you this booklet and proxy materials on or about March 31, 2011 because the Board of Directors of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation, doing business as Wabtec Corporation (“Wabtec”), is soliciting your proxy to vote at the company’s 2011 annual meeting of stockholders.

Who May Vote

Stockholders of Wabtec as reflected in our stock records at the close of business on March 16, 2011 may vote. You have one vote for each share of Wabtec common stock you own.

How to Vote

You may vote in person at the meeting or by proxy. We recommend you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the meeting. You can always change your vote at the meeting. Your vote is important.

If you are a stockholder whose shares are registered in your name, you may vote your shares in person at the meeting or by one of the three following methods:

If you vote by Internet or telephone, you do not need to request a proxy card.

Shares registered in your name are generally covered by one Notice. If you hold shares through someone else, such as a bank, stockbroker, or trustee you will get a Notice from them asking you to vote. Please follow the instructions on their Notice. Please vote with respect to each Notice you receive.

How a Proxy Works

Giving us a proxy means you authorize us to vote your shares in accordance with your directions. If you do not make any selections, your shares will be voted in favor of our director candidates, in favor of the approval of the advisory (non-binding) resolution approving the 2010 named executive officer compensation, in favor of an advisory (non-binding) vote advising the company to conduct a stockholder advisory vote on named executive officer compensation at each annual meeting, in favor of the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan and in favor of ratifying the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.

Changing Your Vote

You may revoke your proxy before it is voted by submitting a new proxy with a later date including a proxy given over the Internet or by telephone, by voting in person at the meeting or by a notification in writing to the Secretary of Wabtec at 1001 Air Brake Avenue, Wilmerding, PA 15148.

Common Stock Outstanding

As of the close of business on March 16, 2011, approximately 48,120,651 shares of Wabtec common stock were issued and outstanding.

Quorum and Voting Information

To conduct the business of the meeting, we must have a quorum. This means at least a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote must be present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting. You are considered a part of the quorum if you vote over the Internet, by telephone or by submitting a properly signed proxy card if you requested copies of the proxy materials.

Abstentions and broker non-votes (i.e., proxies submitted by brokers that do not indicate a vote for a proposal because they do not have discretionary voting authority and have not received instructions as to how to vote on the proposal) are counted as present in determining whether the quorum requirement for the annual meeting is satisfied.

To be elected, nominees for director must receive a plurality of the votes cast. This means that the two director nominees with the most votes are elected. With regard to the election of directors, votes may be cast in favor of or withheld from each nominee. Votes that are withheld will be excluded entirely from the vote and will have no effect. Broker non-votes and abstentions with respect to the election of directors will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors.

Approval of the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan requires, under the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, the favorable vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal. In addition, NYSE rules require that the total votes cast on this proposal represent over 50% of all shares entitled to vote on the proposal. Abstentions will be treated as a vote cast, but broker non-votes will not.

For approval, all other matters to be voted on require a favorable vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote on the applicable matter. An abstention will therefore have the same effect as a vote against the applicable proposal. Broker non-votes with respect to any such proposal will have no effect on the outcome of the vote with respect to that proposal.

Approval of any other matter that properly comes before the annual meeting requires the favorable vote of a majority of shares present and entitled to vote on the matter, unless the matter requires more than a majority vote under statute or our by-laws. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes with respect to any such proposal will have no effect on the outcome of the vote with respect to that proposal.

If your shares are held by a broker, the broker will ask you how you want your shares to be voted. If you give the broker instructions, your shares will be voted as you direct. If you do not give instructions, one of two things can happen, depending on the type of proposal. For the ratification of the independent auditor (Proposal 5), the broker may vote your shares in its discretion. For all other proposals, the broker may not vote your shares at all if you do not give instructions.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership of Wabtec stock. Directors and officers must furnish us

with copies of these reports. Based on these copies and directors’ and executive officers’ representations we believe all directors and executive officers complied with the requirements of Section 16(a) in 2010, except that William E. Kassling filed one late Form 4 covering the sale of stock on May 12, 2010. The relevant Form 4 was filed on February 9, 2011.

Wabtec’s Board of Directors currently has 10 members and two vacant seats. The Board is divided into three classes whose terms of office end in successive years. Emilio A. Fernandez and Lee B. Foster, II, whose terms of office are expiring, have been nominated to serve for new terms ending in 2014. James V. Napier, whose term of office is also expiring, will resign from the Board upon expiration of his three-year term in May 2011, resulting in another vacant seat on the Board.¹ The Board may act at a future date to fill the remaining vacancies or reduce the size of the Board. All nominations were made by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as further described under “The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee” on page 10, and approved by the entire Board of Directors.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require our directors to possess qualities and skills necessary to oversee the management of Wabtec. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Charter establishes a commitment to find nominees for membership on the Board of Directors that are of the highest possible caliber and are able to provide insightful, intelligent and effective guidance to the management of Wabtec. As part of this process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Charter requires the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to ensure that the Board of Directors consists of individuals from diverse educational and professional experiences and backgrounds who, collectively, provide meaningful counsel to management. Under the Corporate Governance Guidelines, it is the responsibility of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to establish, and from time to time review with the Board, the requisite skills and characteristics for new Board members. In assessing potential nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will take into account the following criteria:

With respect to nomination of continuing directors for re-election, the committee also reviews and considers each nominee’s contributions to the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s process to recommend qualified director candidates is further described on page 10 under “The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.” As described above, and although the Board does not have a separate diversity policy, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers diversity as one of a number of factors in identifying nominees for director pursuant to its charter. The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe it is essential that the Board members represent diverse backgrounds. In considering nominees for director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts inquiries into the background and qualifications of possible candidates and actively recruits qualified individuals. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assesses the effectiveness of its approach as part of the annual review of its charter and the Corporate Governance Guidelines and as part of its annual review of the effectiveness of the Board and each committee of the Board.

The description of each director and each nominee set forth below includes biographical information, on a director by director basis, and highlights the specific experience, qualifications, attributes, background and education of each director and each nominee that led the Board to conclude that each director or nominee should serve on the Board. In addition to the qualifications described in the biographical information set forth below, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board also determined that each director and each nominee possesses certain intangible attributes and skills, which led to the conclusion that each director and each nominee meets the criteria set forth

in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and is qualified to serve as one of our directors. These intangible attributes and skills include, as to each nominee, integrity, the capacity to evaluate business issues and make practical and mature judgments, willingness to devote the necessary time and effort required to serve on our Board, the skills and personality to work effectively and collegially with other directors on a Board that is responsive to Wabtec’s needs, and the self-confidence and communication skills to participate effectively in Board discussions.

Vote Required

Your proxy will be voted “for” the election of these nominees unless you withhold authority to vote for any one or more of them. If any nominee is unable or unwilling to stand for election, your proxy authorizes us to vote for a replacement nominee if the Board names one.

Only votes “for” a candidate are counted in the election of directors. The two nominees who receive the most votes will be elected as directors.

The Board recommends you vote FOR each of the following candidates.

The Board and Committees

The Board met six times during 2010. With one exception, all directors attended all meetings of the Board and the committees on which they served in 2010. One director was unable to attend the Board and committee meetings held on April 13, 2010. The standing Board committees that help the Board fulfill its duties include the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. The Board also holds regularly scheduled meetings of non-employee directors. Mr. Fernandez presided at these meetings in 2010. Mr. Kassling, who became independent in January 2011, currently presides at these meetings.

In addition to the independence requirements set forth in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), the Board has adopted categorical standards to assist it in determining whether its members meet the independence requirements of the NYSE. These standards provide that the following relationships are deemed to be immaterial and would not in and of themselves impair a director’s independence:

The Board has reviewed the independence of its members considering these standards and any other commercial, legal, accounting and familial relationships between the directors and Wabtec and has determined that a majority of its members are independent. Specifically, none of the following directors, Mr. Brooks, Mr. Fernandez, Mr. Foster, Mr. Hehir, Mr. Howell, Mr. Kassling, Mr. Napier, Mr. Valade and Mr. Vande Steeg, has a material

relationship with Wabtec, and each such director meets the Board’s categorical independence standards and the independence requirements of the NYSE listing standards.

It is the company’s policy that all directors attend the annual meeting of stockholders if reasonably possible. All directors then serving attended the 2010 annual meeting of stockholders.

Board Leadership Structure

We separate the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board in recognition of the differences between the two roles. The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for setting the strategic direction for Wabtec and the day to day leadership and performance of the company, while the Chairman of the Board provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer, sets the agenda for Board meetings and presides over meetings of the full Board. Because Mr. Kassling, our Chairman, was not independent under the rules of the NYSE and the Board’s categorical independence standards until January 2011, our Board of Directors appointed the Chairman of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Emilio A. Fernandez, as “lead director” to preside at all 2010 executive sessions of “non-management” directors, as defined under the rules of the NYSE. As Mr. Kassling is now independent, our Board appointed him as “lead director” to preside at all such 2011 executive sessions. The Board generally holds executive sessions five times a year. At least one executive session each year is required to be attended only by independent directors.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing and monitoring the material risks facing the company.

In its oversight role, the Board of Directors annually reviews Wabtec’s strategic plan, which addresses, among other things, the risks and opportunities facing the company. The Board also has overall responsibility for executive officer succession planning and reviews succession plans each year. The Board has delegated certain risk management oversight responsibility to the Board committees. As part of its responsibilities set forth in its charter, the

Audit Committee is responsible for discussing with management Wabtec’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control those exposures, including the company’s risk assessment and risk management policies. In this regard, Wabtec’s management prepares a comprehensive risk assessment report and reviews that report with the Audit Committee each Board meeting. This report identifies the material business risks (including strategic, operational, financial reporting and compliance risks) for the company as a whole, as well as for each business unit and for corporate common services, and identifies the controls that respond to and mitigate those risks. Wabtec’s management regularly evaluates these controls, and periodically reports to the Audit Committee regarding the controls design and effectiveness. The Audit Committee also receives annual reports from management on Wabtec’s ethics program and on environmental compliance. The Compensation Committee extensively reviewed the elements of compensation to determine whether any portion of compensation encouraged excessive risk taking and concluded:

Furthermore, as described in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation decisions include subjective considerations, which restrain the influence of objective factors on excessive risk taking.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews Wabtec’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and their implementation. Each committee reports to the full Board.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee approved continued use of its written charter at its February 15, 2011 meeting. A current copy of the charter is available on Wabtec’s website at http://www.wabtec.com.

The principal functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are to:

The Committee met two times during 2010. The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in 2010 were Mr. Brooks, Mr. Fernandez, Mr. Howell and Mr. Vande Steeg, who were each independent, as independence for such members is defined in the listing standards of the NYSE. Mr. Fernandez is the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The composition of the current Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee remains the same.

The Committee will consider director nominees recommended by stockholders. Stockholders wishing to recommend a director candidate for consideration by the Committee can do so by writing the Secretary of Wabtec at 1001 Air Brake Avenue, Wilmerding, PA 15148 and giving the candidate’s name, biographical data and qualifications. Any such recommendation should be accompanied by a written statement from the individual of his or her consent to be named as a candidate and, if nominated and elected, to serve as a director. No candidates for Board membership have been put forward by stockholders for election at the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders.

In evaluating candidates for the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the entirety of each candidate’s credentials. The Committee is guided by the objective set forth in its charter of ensuring that the Board consists of

individuals from diverse educational and professional experiences and backgrounds who collectively provide meaningful counsel to management. The Committee considers the candidate’s character, integrity, experience, understanding of strategy and policy-setting and reputation for working well with others. In connection with this evaluation, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines whether to interview the prospective nominee and, if warranted, one or more members of the committee, and others as appropriate, interview prospective nominees. After completing this evaluation and interview, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee makes a recommendation to the full Board as to the persons who should be nominated by the Board, and the Board determines the nominees after considering the recommendation and report of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. If candidates are recommended by the company’s stockholders, such candidates will be evaluated using the same criteria. With respect to nomination of continuing directors for re-election, the individual’s contributions to the Board are also considered.

The Audit Committee

The Audit Committee acts under a written charter. The Audit Committee reviewed and approved the continued use of its written charter at its February 15, 2011 meeting. A current copy of the charter is available on Wabtec’s website at http://www.wabtec.com.

The Audit Committee provides assistance to the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility to stockholders, the investment community and others relating to the integrity of Wabtec’s financial statements, its financial reporting process, its systems of internal accounting and financial controls, the performance of Wabtec’s internal audit function and independent registered public accountants, the independent registered public accountant’s qualifications and independence, and Wabtec’s compliance with ethics policies and legal and regulatory requirements. The Committee is directly responsible for appointing, compensating, retaining and overseeing the work of the independent registered public accounting firm engaged by Wabtec. The Audit Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by Wabtec regarding accounting,

internal controls or auditing matters and the confidential anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

The Audit Committee met six times in 2010. The members of the Audit Committee in 2010 were Mr. Brooks, Mr. Foster, Mr. Hehir, Mr. Howell and Mr. Valade, who are each independent, as independence is defined in the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and in the listing standards of the NYSE. The Board has determined that Mr. Valade, the Audit Committee’s Chairman, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The composition of the current Audit Committee remains the same.

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing Wabtec’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management of the company has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal controls. In the performance of our oversight function, we meet with management periodically to consider the adequacy of the company’s internal controls and the objectivity of its financial reporting. We meet privately with the independent registered public accountants, who have unrestricted access to the audit committee. Specifically, we have reviewed and discussed with management and the independent registered public accountants the company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

We have also discussed with the independent registered public accountants the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1 AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.

Furthermore, we have received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accountants required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and have

discussed with the independent registered public accountants their independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board of Directors that Wabtec’s audited financial statements, as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, be included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2010, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Respectfully submitted,

Gary C. Valade, Chairman

Robert J. Brooks

Lee B. Foster, II

Brian P. Hehir

Michael W. D. Howell

The Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee provides assistance to the Board relating to the compensation of Wabtec’s officers and directors. The Compensation Committee has authority, pursuant to its charter, to make recommendations to the Board, which then establishes compensation. The Compensation Committee’s principal responsibilities include:

The Compensation Committee members in 2010 were Mr. Foster, Mr. Hehir, Mr. Napier and Mr. Vande Steeg, who were each independent, as independence for such members is defined in the listing standards of the NYSE. Mr. Foster served as the Compensation Committee’s Chairman. The composition of the current Compensation Committee remains the same. The Nominating and Governance Committee recommends the Compensation Committee members who are approved by the full Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee met four times in 2010. The Compensation Committee approved continued use of its written charter at its February 15, 2011 meeting. A copy of the written charter is available on Wabtec’s website at http://www.wabtec.com.

The Compensation Committee recommends executive compensation to the Board, which then establishes these items. Base salaries are established at the beginning of the fiscal year and bonuses are awarded after fiscal year results are available. Base salaries depend mainly on the executive officer’s position and responsibility, while bonuses are based on pre-established performance factors. These factors are established at the beginning of the year and include (i) a financial performance factor measuring either earnings per share or earnings before interest and taxes and working capital management and (ii) a personal performance factor which measures whether the individual executive attained certain quantitative and measureable goals established for that executive.

Executive officers also receive long-term incentive compensation. With respect to the long-term incentive portion of executive compensation, the Compensation Committee has discretion to grant long-term incentive awards under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended. The Company is proposing the adoption of a 2011 Stock Incentive Plan to replace the existing plan and, if such new plan is approved by stockholders, future long-term incentive awards will be made under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan. Such awards take the form of stock options, performance units and restricted share awards. The Compensation Committee bases the amount of the award upon the executive’s job level, as well as other factors. These factors include benchmarking the total compensation an executive may earn to ensure it is competitive, compensating executives in a “pay for performance” manner and aligning the interests of the executives with the interests of the shareholders. The Committee also reviews the ratio of total compensation to total target cash compensation to ensure that the mix of long term compensation is appropriate for each executive.

On February 15, 2011, the Compensation Committee adopted a resolution that provided guidelines as to the acceleration of the vesting of stock options and restricted stock upon the normal retirement or early retirement of an employee to whom such options or restricted stock were granted under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. The general policy of the Compensation Committee is to consent to the acceleration of vesting upon normal retirement or early retirement of an employee in circumstances where the employee is in good standing with the company and the employee’s retirement is not

inconsistent with the desires of the company. Acceleration of vesting shall be in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.

The Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President of Human Resources suggest guidelines in discussions with the Compensation Committee regarding executive compensation. They provide recommendations and information regarding the competitiveness of the industry, key employees, performance of individuals, succession planning and other relevant data to the committee. The Chief Executive Officer is not present during any discussions concerning his compensation. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to retain compensation consultants as it deems necessary and has the sole authority to approve such consultants’ fees.

During 2009, the Compensation Committee agreed to a management recommendation to change the compensation pay structure for the non-employee directors effective January 2010. Wabtec monitored and benchmarked the directors’ pay to ensure that Wabtec was competitive. The company used surveys by the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD), surveys from the Conference Board and recent proxy filings to ensure competitiveness. In addition, the company created an independent index of similar sized publicly held manufacturing companies. These companies include: Tecumseh Products, Briggs and Stratton, Thomas and Betts, Regal Beloit, Woodward Governor, IDEX Corp., Sauer-Danfross, Kennametal, Trinity Industries, Flowserve and Greenbrier Companies. As a result, the Compensation Committee agreed with management recommendations to change the stock retainer to a fixed total value of stock ($100,000) versus the current practice of giving a fixed number of shares. In addition, non-employee directors will no longer receive annual stock option grants as part of their compensation package. These changes came into effect January 1, 2010. The benchmarking study also noted that the trend in director compensation reflected significant increases in compensation over the past few years, and Wabtec’s practice of paying both a cash and a stock retainer is considered a best practice by the NACD.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2010, Wabtec had no interlocking relationships in which (i) an executive officer of

Wabtec served as a member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee of Wabtec; (ii) an executive officer of Wabtec served as a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee of Wabtec; or (iii) an executive officer of Wabtec served as a member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director of Wabtec. No member of the Compensation Committee was at any time during the 2010 fiscal year or at any other time an officer or employee of the company, and no member had any relationship with us requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included on pages 13 through 18 of this proxy statement with management.

Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommends to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Respectfully submitted,

Lee B. Foster, II, Chairman

Brian P. Hehir

James V. Napier

Nickolas W. Vande Steeg

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview. This compensation discussion describes the material elements of compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each of our executive officers who served as named executive officers during 2010. This discussion focuses primarily on the fiscal year 2010 information contained in the following tables and related footnotes and narrative. We discuss compensation actions taken prior to 2010 or in 2011

if we believe it provides relevant information or where required.

The principal elements of our executive compensation program are base salary, annual cash incentives, and long-term equity incentives in the form of restricted stock, stock options and performance units. Our other benefits and perquisites consist of life and health insurance benefits, social and health club dues, automobile allowances for certain executive officers, tax gross-up payments and a qualified 401(k) savings or comparable foreign plan (including company matching contributions). Our philosophy is to position the aggregate of these elements at the average of that paid to executives with similar responsibilities. To ensure that the company is able to attract and retain high potential executives, the company benchmarks executive compensation using compensation surveys of similar sized companies and also uses an index average of similar sized manufacturing companies. This index includes: Tecumseh Products, Briggs and Stratton, Thomas and Betts, Regal Beloit, Woodward Governor, IDEX Corp., Sauer-Danfross, Kennametal, Trinity Industries, Flowserve and Greenbrier Companies.

Objectives and Philosophy. The overall objectives of our executive compensation program are to (i) enable us to attract, motivate and retain key executive talent essential to the achievement of our short-term and long-term business objectives; (ii) provide compensation competitive with others in our industry; (iii) reward senior executive officers in a “pay for performance” manner for accomplishment of pre-defined business goals and objectives; and (iv) align the interests of our executives with our stockholders. A significant portion of total executive compensation is variable compensation linked to corporate, business unit and individual performance. Our objective is to provide a significant portion of an executive’s total compensation in a form that is contingent upon achieving established performance goals. In regard to compensation based on performance, our objective is to provide a significant portion of such compensation in the form of equity awards.

In setting base salaries at the beginning of the year, the Compensation Committee generally reviews information about compensation practices and levels in Wabtec’s industry and the position and responsibility of the particular executive. The company uses benchmarking to establish base salaries as discussed below. The annual incentive award for 2010 is a cash award determined by the Compensation Committee based on pre-established performance factors. These factors are established at the beginning of the year and include (i) a financial performance factor measuring earnings before interest and taxes and working capital management and (ii) a personal performance factor which measures whether the individual executive attained pre-determined goals and objectives established for that executive which are tied to the overall company strategic objectives for that year. Long-term incentives in the form of stock options, restricted stock and performance units are granted to provide the opportunity for long-term compensation based upon the performance of Wabtec and its ability to meet its long term goals and objectives.

Compensation Process.

Compensation Committee. Executive officer compensation is administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee recommends base salaries and bonuses of executive officers to the Board, which then approves these items. The Committee approved the 2010 compensation arrangements described in this compensation discussion and analysis and recommended them to the full Board, which then approved them. Our Board of Directors delegates to the Compensation Committee the direct responsibility for, among other matters:

Role of Compensation Experts. Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee is authorized to engage compensation consultants to assist it with its duties. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any outside counsel or other experts or consultants to assist it in the evaluation of compensation of our directors and executive officers, including the sole authority to approve such consultants’ fees and other retention terms. The company utilized a compensation consultant in conjunction with determining long-term goals and objectives as part of the company’s long-term incentive compensation plan for the 2006–2008 performance period. The same methodology has been utilized by Wabtec to determine goals for subsequent performance periods. The Compensation Committee may also obtain advice from legal, accounting, human resources and other advisors as it deems necessary.

Role of Our Executive Officers in the Compensation Process. The Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President of Human Resources suggest guidelines in discussions with the Compensation Committee regarding executive compensation. They provide recommendations and information regarding the competitiveness of the industry, key employees, performance of individuals, succession and other relevant data to the committee. The Chief Executive Officer is not present during any discussions concerning his compensation.

Components of Compensation.

Our 2010 compensation program elements were primarily structured to reward our executive officers for achieving certain financial and business objectives.

Base Salaries. Base salaries for our executive officers are reviewed annually and depend mainly on the executive’s office and responsibility and are based on the competitive average for executives with similar responsibilities in peer group companies. In this regard, the company uses two different benchmarks, one a broader benchmark study based on manufacturing companies that are between $1.0 billion and $1.9 billion in revenue and a second study that is an index average of specific manufacturing companies that are similar to the company in size, geography, and industry. In this context, similar companies are defined as those that are comparable to us in size and scope, and in the nature of their businesses. This specific index includes the following companies: Tecumseh Products, Briggs and Stratton, Thomas and Betts, Regal Beloit, Woodward Governor, IDEX Corp., Sauer-Danfross, Kennametal, Trinity Industries, Flowserve and Greenbrier Companies. Individual salaries may be above or below the competitive average based on the individual’s contribution to business results, capabilities and qualifications, potential and the importance of the individual’s position to our success.

For fiscal year 2010, the base salary increases of our named executive officers ranged from 0% to 4.2% as a result of this process. These increases are discussed further in connection with the “Summary Compensation Table” which follows.

Annual Cash Incentive Awards. Our annual incentive award plan is intended to: (i) compensate participants directly if strategic and financial performance targets are achieved and (ii) reward participants for performance on those activities that are most directly under their control and for which they are held accountable. Corporate, business unit and individual

performance goals under the annual incentive plan are linked to the annual business plan and budget. Bonuses are a function of the company’s overall financial performance, the participant’s individual performance and Board approval. Bonuses are based upon the success of two factors: a financial performance factor or “FPF” (ranging from 0 to 1.5 maximum), that measures either earnings per share or earnings before interest and taxes or earnings per share and working capital management; and a personal performance factor or “PPF” (ranging from 0 to 1.5 maximum) that measures whether the executive has attained certain goals agreed to by the executive, the executive’s supervisor, and the Board. The bonus formula is based on the product of the participant’s base salary, the participant’s target bonus percentage, the FPF and the PPF. To qualify for a minimum payout under the bonus plan, the business unit or company, as applicable to the particular participant, must achieve at least 80% of its plan’s EBIT and 80% of its working capital plan target for the year. We believe that this philosophy encourages Wabtec and our executives to establish ambitious goals and that it promotes teamwork, productivity and profitability. Overall, total cash compensation (the sum of salary and bonus) for our executive officers is competitive with market practice for similar executive positions in similar companies when performance goals under the annual bonus plan are achieved. Target bonuses and performance factors were approved by the Compensation Committee at its meeting in February 2010. For 2010, the company achieved a financial performance factor of 1.1976 based on EBIT and working capital plan targets. If both the financial performance factor and the applicable personal performance factor were achieved, the named executive officers would earn 100% of their target bonus.

Mr. Neupaver, Mr. Garcia-Tunon, Mr. Kovac, Mr. Betler and Mr. Mathes participated in the annual incentive plan and each of them, due to the

company’s performance and their individual performance achieved greater than their target bonus. The bonuses received as a result are reflected in

the non-equity incentive plan compensation column of the “Summary Compensation Table” below.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation. We currently administer our long-term incentive compensation through the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, under which we grant stock options, restricted stock and performance units. As of December 31, 2010, a total of 789,493 shares of common stock are available for issuance under the plan. The plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. During 2010, 142,125 shares of restricted stock, 158,150 performance units and 120,125 stock options were granted under the plan of which 62,000, 72,000, and 54,000, respectively, were granted to our named executive officers. Options and restricted stock are generally granted to employees, including our executive officers, each February as part of their long term compensation and were actually granted in February 2010. We vary the relative amounts of options and restricted stock granted in a given year based on a number of factors including the overall performance of the company, the stock price and retention of key management. Performance units are generally awarded each year for a three-year performance period and were actually granted in February 2010. The primary purposes of the long-term incentive program are to align the interests of executive officers and other key employees with those of our stockholders, to attract and retain key executive talent and to provide an incentive to meet and exceed long-term financial goals. Employees eligible for the long-term incentive program include those who are determined by the Compensation Committee to be in key policy-setting and decision-making roles, and to have responsibilities that contribute significantly to achieving our earnings goals. The size of an individual’s long-term incentive award is based primarily on individual performance, the individual’s responsibilities and position with our company. Long-term incentive award values are competitive with market practice for comparable executive positions in similar companies.

Any awards made under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan will be recovered (a “clawback”) by the company if between the date of grant and the third anniversary of any exercise, payment or vesting of the award, the participant:

The clawback does not apply following the occurrence of a change of control event unless the award agreement specifically so provides.

Wabtec is proposing the adoption of a 2011 Stock Incentive Plan to replace the existing plan and, if such new plan is approved by stockholders, future long-term incentive awards will be made under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan. Under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, the company will be able to grant 1,900,000 shares plus any shares which remain eligible for grant under the existing plan on the date the shareholders approve the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan. We expect to make grants under and administer the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan in the same manner as we do with the existing plan.

Stock options and restricted stock are a part of our long-term incentive compensation program that seeks to align the interests of our executives with our stockholders. We have typically granted stock options and restricted stock in February of the applicable year. We have historically awarded options to purchase our common stock to executive officers at the fair market value (average of the high and low price) of our common stock at the grant date. We have not back-dated any option awards. The

vesting schedule for each grant of options and restricted stock is determined by the Compensation Committee and has typically been in 25% increments over a four-year period. In February of 2010, we granted both restricted stock and stock options to all named executive officers as part of their long term compensation with the company.

In addition, in 2004, the company implemented a three-year long-term incentive program. This program is designed to reward executives on meeting or exceeding economic profit growth goals. Economic profit is a measure of the extent to which the company produces financial results in excess of its cost of capital. The program is structured as a rolling three-year plan; each year starts a new three-year performance cycle with the most recent cycle being 2010-2012. For each executive selected to participate in this program, we establish a target grant of performance units at the beginning of each three-year performance cycle. A performance unit is equal to a share of Wabtec common stock. If Wabtec achieves its three-year cumulative economic profit goal, then participants will earn the target grant of performance units. In general, the goals increase each year taking into account expected market conditions, and are intended to reflect a superior performance by management. If Wabtec achieves the maximum three-year cumulative economic profit goal, a participant will earn a maximum number (equal to two times the target level) of performance units. If Wabtec achieves the threshold three-year cumulative economic profit goal, a participant will earn a threshold number (equal to one-quarter of the target level) of performance units. No performance units will be earned for performance below the three-year cumulative economic profit threshold and no additional performance units will be earned for performance exceeding the three-year cumulative economic profit maximum. This program is intended to encourage the long-term stability of Wabtec’s management by establishing ambitious goals designed to promote the long-term productivity and profitability of the company. If a program participant leaves the company voluntarily, or is terminated for cause, he or she is not eligible to receive any performance units he or she may have earned under the program. If a program participant otherwise leaves the company, his or her payout may be pro-rated in accordance with the amount of time he or she participated in the program relative to the performance period. For the 2010–2012 performance

cycle, the Compensation Committee approved target goals based on cumulative economic profit for the performance period. These goals were based on a range of considerations including expected demand in Wabtec’s key end user markets, investor expectations and management’s business plan which includes year over year growth.

During 2010, Wabtec achieved 50.25% of its target three-year cumulative economic profit goal of $304,585,000 for the 2008–2010 performance cycle, which resulted in the following payouts in March 2011 to the named executive officers:

Executive Officers as a group received 37,688 shares of Wabtec common stock with a value at payout of $2,106,194.

Stock Ownership Requirements. In February 2007, Wabtec approved stock ownership guidelines for executive management and for non-employee board members. These guidelines were established to encourage our key employees and Board members to own and retain shares of stock. The guidelines are as follows: President and CEO to accumulate shares equal to seven times base salary; members of the executive office to accumulate shares equal to three times base salary; general managers and equivalent to accumulate shares equal to two times base salary; and non-employee Board members to accumulate shares equal to four times their retainer and board fees. These ownership guidelines are to be achieved within three to five years and are defined as a multiple of base salary for executives and a multiple of cash compensation for the non-employee board members. As of March 16, 2011, our directors and executive officers as a group owned approximately 6.05% of our common stock.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits. Supplemental benefits are offered to selected executive officers with the goal of attracting and

retaining key executive talent. Those perquisites may include: life and health insurance benefits, social and health club dues, automobile allowances for certain executive officers, and tax gross-up payments.

Post-Termination Compensation.

The company does not generally provide employment agreements to its executive officers. On June 30, 2009, the Board of Directors entered into employment continuation agreements with eight senior executive officers, including the following named executive officers: Albert J. Neupaver, Alvaro Garcia-Tunon, Charles F. Kovac, Richard A. Mathes and Raymond T. Betler. These agreements are discussed below generally, and as applicable in the

event of a change of control of Wabtec. Also discussed below, certain of our benefit plans contain provisions that address termination of an individual or a change in control of the company.

Tax Implications of Executive Compensation. Our aggregate deductions for each named executive officer’s compensation are potentially limited by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to the extent the aggregate amount paid to an executive officer exceeds $1.0 million, unless it is paid under a predetermined objective performance plan meeting certain requirements, or satisfies one of various other exceptions specified in the Internal Revenue Code.