Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement

May 11, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

March 29, 2018

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the annual meeting of stockholders to be held at the Company’s worldwide headquarters, 6401 N. Eldridge Parkway, Houston, Texas, on May 11, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. For those of you who cannot be present at this annual meeting, we urge that you participate by voting your proxy over the Internet, by telephone or mail at your earliest convenience.

This booklet includes the notice of the meeting and the proxy statement, which contains information about the Board of Directors and its committees and personal information about the nominee for the Board. Other matters on which action is expected to be taken during the meeting are also described.

It is important that your shares are represented at the meeting, whether or not you are able to attend personally. Accordingly, please vote your proxy over the Internet, by telephone or, if printed proxy materials are mailed to you, by signing, dating and mailing promptly the enclosed proxy in the envelope provided.

On behalf of the Board of Directors, thank you for your continued support.

Blake T. DeBerry

President and Chief Executive Officer

Notice Of Annual Meeting Of Stockholders

The Board of Directors has fixed March 19, 2018 as the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting or any reconvened meeting after an adjournment thereof, and only holders of common stock of record at the close of business on that date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting or any reconvened meeting after an adjournment.

You are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Even if you plan to attend the meeting, however, you are requested to vote your proxy over the Internet, by telephone or, if printed proxy materials are mailed to you, by marking, signing, dating and returning the accompanying proxy in the envelope provided as soon as possible.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Blake T. DeBerry

President and Chief Executive Officer

March 29, 2018

PROXY VOTING

Your vote is important. Please vote promptly so your shares can be represented, even if you plan to attend the annual meeting. You can vote by Internet at http://www.envisionreports.com/DRQ.com, by telephone at 1-800-652-8683 or by requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials and using the proxy card enclosed with the printed materials.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 11, 2018.

The Proxy Statement, our annual report to stockholders and other proxy materials

are available at http://www.edocumentview.com/DRQ.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT

INTRODUCTION

This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Dril-Quip, Inc., a Delaware corporation, of proxies from the holders of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, for use at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the time and place and for the purposes set forth in the accompanying notice. We are furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders primarily via the Internet, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each stockholder. We expect to provide notice and electronic delivery of this proxy statement and the accompanying proxy to stockholders on or about March 29, 2018. If you would prefer to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the notice.

In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, proxies may also be solicited by telephone or personal interview by our regular employees. We will pay all costs of soliciting proxies. We will also reimburse brokers or other persons holding stock in their names or in the names of their nominees for their reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of such stock.

RECORD DATE AND VOTING SECURITIES

As of the close of business on March 19, 2018, the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting, we had outstanding and entitled to vote 38,133,243 shares of common stock. Each share entitles the holder to one vote on each matter submitted to a vote of stockholders.

The requirement for a quorum at the annual meeting is the presence in person or by proxy of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Proxies indicating stockholder abstentions and shares represented by “broker non-votes” (i.e., shares held by brokers or nominees for which instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or persons entitled to vote and for which the broker or nominee does not have discretionary power to vote on a particular matter) will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum at the annual meeting. Votes cast by proxy or in person at the annual meeting will be counted by the persons appointed as election inspectors for the annual meeting.

Brokers holding shares must vote according to specific instructions they receive from the beneficial owners of those shares. If brokers do not receive specific instructions, brokers may in some cases vote the shares in their discretion. However, the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, precludes brokers from exercising voting discretion on certain proposals without specific instructions from the beneficial owner. Importantly, NYSE rules expressly prohibit brokers holding shares in “street name” for their beneficial holder clients from voting on behalf of those clients in uncontested director elections or on matters that relate to executive compensation without receiving specific voting instructions from those clients. Under NYSE rules, brokers will have discretion to vote only on Proposal 2 (approval of the appointment of independent registered public accounting firm). Brokers cannot vote on Proposal 1 (election of directors) or Proposal 3 (advisory vote to approve executive compensation) without instructions from the beneficial owners. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote on these matters, your broker will not vote for you.

All duly executed proxies received prior to the annual meeting will be voted in accordance with the choices specified thereon and, in connection with any other business that may properly come before the meeting, in the discretion of the persons named in the proxy. As to any matter for which no choice has been specified in a duly executed proxy, the shares represented thereby will be voted FOR the election as director of the nominee listed herein, FOR approval of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, FOR approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers and in the discretion of the persons named in the proxy in connection with any other business that may properly come before the annual meeting.

2018 Proxy Statement    1

A stockholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is voted at the annual meeting by filing with the Corporate Secretary at our executive offices a written instrument revoking it, by delivering a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by appearing at the annual meeting and voting in person. Our executive offices are located at 6401 N. Eldridge Parkway, Houston, Texas 77041. For a period of ten days prior to the annual meeting, a complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be available for inspection by stockholders of record during ordinary business hours for proper purposes at our executive offices.

2    2018 Proxy Statement

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned directly or indirectly as of March 19, 2018 or as otherwise indicated below by (i) each person who is known to us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each of our directors, director nominees and executive officers and (iii) all directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group.

2018 Proxy Statement    3

4    2018 Proxy Statement

PROPOSAL 1    Election of Directors

Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, Class I, Class II and Class III, with staggered terms of office ending in 2019, 2020 and 2018, respectively. The term for each class expires on the date of the third annual stockholders’ meeting for the election of directors following the most recent election of directors for such class. Each director holds office until the next annual meeting of stockholders for the election of directors of his class or until his successor has been duly appointed or elected and qualified.

Our Board of Directors has nominated Steven L. Newman for election as a director to serve a three-year term expiring on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2021 (or until his successor is duly appointed or elected and qualified). Mr. Newman currently serves as a member of our Board of Directors. In accordance with our bylaws, directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast at the meeting. This means that the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote. For additional information on the election of directors, see “Corporate Governance Matters — Majority Voting in Director Elections.”

Our Board of Directors has no reason to believe that Mr. Newman will not be a candidate for director at the time of the annual meeting or will be unable to serve as a director. If Mr. Newman becomes unavailable for election, our Board of Directors can name a substitute nominee, and proxies will be voted for the substitute nominee pursuant to discretionary authority, unless withheld.

Board Composition

2018 Proxy Statement    5

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the election of the nominee listed below. Properly dated and signed proxies will be so voted unless authority to vote in the election of directors is withheld.

Nominee for Class III Director for Three-Year Term to Expire in 2021

The following sets forth information concerning the nominee for election as a director at the annual meeting, including the nominee’s age as of March 19, 2018, position with us, business experience during the past five years and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused our Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board to determine that the nominee should serve as a director of the Company.

6    2018 Proxy Statement

Information Concerning Class I and Class II Directors

The following sets forth information concerning the Class I and Class II directors whose present terms of office will expire at the 2019 and 2020 annual meetings of stockholders, respectively, including each director’s age as of March 19, 2018, position with us, if any, business experience during the past five years and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused our Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board to determine that the nominees should serve as directors of the Company.

Class I

2018 Proxy Statement    7

Class II

8    2018 Proxy Statement

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

Board Leadership Structure

The offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are currently separate and have been separate since October 2011. At that time, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Lovoi as Chairman of the Board and Blake T. DeBerry as President and Chief Executive Officer.

The Board does not have a policy requiring either that the positions of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer should be separate or that they should be occupied by the same individual. The Board believes that this issue is properly addressed as part of the succession planning process and that it is in the best interests of the Company for the Board to make a determination on the matter when it elects a new chief executive officer or at other times consideration is warranted by circumstances. The Board believes that this structure enables it to fulfill its oversight role in determining the manner in which its leadership is configured with a view toward flexibility and maintaining a structure that best serves our Company and its stockholders.

The Board believes that the current separation of these two important roles is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders at this time. This structure permits the Chairman to direct board operations and lead the Board in its oversight of management and the Chief Executive Officer to develop and implement the Company’s board-approved strategic vision and manage its day-to-day business. The separation of duties also allows Mr. Lovoi and Mr. DeBerry to focus on their responsibilities as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, respectively. The Board believes that the independent board chairman helps provide an opportunity for Board members to provide more direct input to management in shaping our organization and strategy and strengthens the Board’s independent oversight of management. To that end, at each regularly scheduled Board meeting, our non-management directors hold executive sessions at which our management is not in attendance. Mr. Lovoi, as Chairman, presides at these sessions.

Board’s Role in the Oversight of Risk Management

The Board of Directors has ultimate oversight responsibility for our system of enterprise risk management. Management is responsible for developing and implementing our program of enterprise risk management. Pursuant to the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee has been designated to take the lead in overseeing our risk management process and overall risk management system at the Board level. Accordingly, the Audit Committee meets periodically with management to review our major risk exposures, including risks associated with information technology and cybersecurity, and the steps management has taken to monitor and control those exposures. The Audit Committee also monitors our risk management policies and guidelines concerning risk assessment and risk management. In this role, the Audit Committee receives reports from management and other advisors and analyzes our risk management process and system, the nature of the material risks we face and the adequacy of our policies and procedures designed to respond to and mitigate these risks.

In addition to the formal compliance program, the Board and the Audit Committee encourage management to promote a corporate culture that understands risk management and incorporates it into our overall corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations. Our risk management structure also includes an ongoing effort to assess and analyze the most likely areas of future risk for the Company. As a result, the Board and Audit Committee periodically ask our executives to discuss the most likely sources of material future risks and how the Company is addressing any significant potential vulnerability.

The Board believes that the administration of its risk oversight function has not affected its leadership structure. In reviewing our compensation program, the Compensation Committee has made an assessment of whether compensation policies and practices create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us and has concluded that they do not create such risks as presently constituted.

2018 Proxy Statement    9

Determinations of Director Independence

Under rules adopted by the NYSE, no board member qualifies as independent unless the Board of Directors affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with us. In evaluating each director’s independence, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances in making a determination of independence. In particular, when assessing the materiality of a director’s relationship with us, the Board considers the issue not merely from the standpoint of the director, but also from the standpoint of persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation.

As contemplated by the rules of the NYSE then in effect, the Board adopted categorical standards in 2004 to assist the Board of Directors in making independence determinations. Under the NYSE rules then in effect, immaterial relationships that fall within the guidelines were not required to be disclosed separately in proxy statements. As set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a relationship falls within the categorical standard if it:

In its determination of independence, the Board of Directors reviewed and considered all relationships and transactions between each director, his family members or any business, charity or other entity in which the director has an interest, on the one hand, and we, our affiliates, or our senior management has an interest, on the other. The Board considered the relationships and transactions in the context of the NYSE’s objective listing standards, the categorical standards noted above and the additional standards established for members of audit, compensation and governance committees.

In connection with its determination as to the independence of directors, the Board considered ordinary course transactions between the Company and Transocean Ltd. (“Transocean”). In particular, the Board considered that Mr. Newman was President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Transocean from March 2010 until February 2015 and that Transocean made payments for products purchased from the Company of approximately $144,471 in 2017. These payments represent approximately 0.03% of the Company’s consolidated gross revenues in 2017, and approximately 0.001% of Transocean’s consolidated gross revenues in 2017. The Board also considered that Transocean may order additional products from the Company in the future. The Board has concluded that these transactions and relationships do not adversely affect Mr. Newman’s ability or willingness to act in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders or otherwise compromise his independence, nor are similar transactions in the future expected to adversely affect Mr. Newman’s independence. The Board took note of the fact that these transactions were on standard terms and conditions and that neither company was afforded any special benefits. The Board further noted that Mr. Newman had no involvement in negotiating the terms of the purchases or interest in the transactions.

As a result of this review, the Board of Directors affirmatively determined that Messrs. Jupp, Lovoi, Shukis and Newman are independent from us and our management. In addition, the Board of Directors affirmatively determined that Messrs. Jupp, Lovoi, Shukis and Newman are independent under the additional standards for audit committee membership and compensation committee membership under rules of the SEC. The remaining director, Mr. DeBerry, is not independent because of his current service as a member of our senior management.

You can access our Independence Guidelines in our Corporate Governance Guidelines on the Investors section of our website at www.dril-quip.com.

10    2018 Proxy Statement

Code of Business Conduct and Ethical Practices

Pursuant to NYSE rules, we have adopted the Dril-Quip, Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethical Practices for our directors, officers and employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethical Practices, which also meets the requirements of a code of ethics under Item 406 of Regulation S-K, is posted on our website at www.dril-quip.com. Changes in and waivers to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethical Practices for our directors and executive officers will also be posted on our website.

Termination of Stockholder Rights Plan

The Board of Directors approved the termination of our stockholder rights plan effective February 26, 2018 ahead of its scheduled expiration date of November 24, 2018.

Majority Voting in Director Elections

Our amended and restated bylaws include a majority voting standard in uncontested director elections. This standard applies to the election of directors at this meeting. To be elected, a nominee must receive more votes cast “for” that nominee’s election than votes cast “against” that nominee’s election. In contested elections, the voting standard will be a plurality of votes cast. Under our bylaws, a contested election is one at which the number of candidates for election as directors exceeds the number of directors to be elected, as determined by our Corporate Secretary as of the tenth day preceding the date we mail or deliver a notice of meeting to stockholders.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include director resignation procedures. In brief, these procedures provide that:

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines can be found on the Investors section of our website at www.dril-quip.com.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors has appointed three committees: the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee.

Audit Committee

The current members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Shukis, who serves as Chairman, and Messrs. Jupp, Lovoi and Newman. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Shukis is an “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.

The Board of Directors has approved the Audit Committee Charter, which contains a detailed description of the Audit Committee’s duties and responsibilities. Under the charter, the Audit Committee has been appointed by the Board of Directors to assist the Board in overseeing (i) the integrity of our financial statements, (ii) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (iii) the independent auditor’s independence, qualifications and performance and (iv) the performance of our internal audit function. The Audit Committee also has direct responsibility for the appointment, compensation and retention of our independent auditors.

2018 Proxy Statement    11

Compensation Committee

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Mr. Jupp, who serves as Chairman, and Messrs. Lovoi, Newman and Shukis.

The Board of Directors has approved the Compensation Committee Charter, which contains a detailed description of the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities. Under the charter, the Compensation Committee assists the Board in establishing the compensation of our directors and executive officers in a manner consistent with our stated compensation strategy, internal equity considerations, competitive practice and the requirements of applicable law and regulations and rules of applicable regulatory bodies.

Compensation Matters

In fulfilling its compensation role, the Compensation Committee is authorized to:

In January 2017, the Compensation Committee decreased the salaries of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel by 10% based upon a proposal of the Chief Executive Officer, which was agreed to by each officer. In October 2017, the Compensation Committee awarded restricted stock and performance units to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel and a specified amount of restricted stock and performance units to be distributed among key employees at the discretion of Mr. DeBerry. Subject to certain limitations, our long-term incentive plan permits the Compensation Committee to delegate its duties under the plan to the Chairman of the Board and our senior officers.

The Compensation Committee also met in February 2018 to determine the annual cash incentive compensation earned during 2017 by our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel. Annual cash incentive compensation for 2017 was based on the Company’s actual performance compared to target performance and adjusted for each officer for the achievement of personal goals. Please see “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for information about the Company’s 2017 executive officer compensation.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The current members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Mr. Lovoi, who serves as Chairman, and Messrs. Jupp, Newman and Shukis.

12    2018 Proxy Statement

The Board of Directors has approved the Nominating and Governance Committee Charter, which contains a detailed description of the Nominating and Governance Committee’s responsibilities. Under the charter, the Nominating and Governance Committee identifies and recommends individuals qualified to become Board members, consistent with criteria approved by the Board, and assists the Board in determining the composition of the Board and its committees, in monitoring a process to assess Board and committee effectiveness and in developing and implementing our corporate governance guidelines, practices and procedures. The Nominating and Governance Committee has the authority to engage a third-party consultant at any time.

Selection of Nominees for the Board of Directors

Identifying Candidates

The Nominating and Governance Committee solicits ideas for potential Board candidates from a number of sources, including members of the Board of Directors, our executive officers, individuals personally known to the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee and research. The charter of the Nominating and Governance Committee was amended in October 2017 to specifically ensure that qualified women and minority candidates are included in director searches. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider candidates submitted by stockholders. Any such submissions should include the candidate’s name and qualifications for Board membership and should be directed to our Corporate Secretary at the address indicated on the first page of this proxy statement. Although the Board does not require the stockholder to submit any particular information regarding the qualifications of the stockholder’s candidate, the level of consideration that the Nominating and Governance Committee will give to the stockholder’s candidate will be commensurate with the quality and quantity of information about the candidate that the nominating stockholder makes available to the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee did not receive any candidate submissions from stockholders during 2017. The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider all candidates identified through the processes described above and will evaluate each of them on the same basis.

In addition, our bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual stockholders meeting whether or not such nominee is submitted to and evaluated by the Nominating and Governance Committee. To nominate a director using this process, the stockholder must follow certain procedures required by the Bylaws which are described under “Additional Information — Advance Notice Required for Stockholder Nominations and Proposals” below.

Evaluating Candidates

The members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are responsible for assessing the skills and characteristics that candidates for election to the Board should possess, as well as the composition of the Board as a whole. This assessment will include the qualifications under applicable independence standards and other standards applicable to the Board and its committees, as well as consideration of skills and experience in the context of the needs of the Board. The charter of the Nominating and Governance Committee requires the committee to evaluate each candidate for election to the Board in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending individuals that can best perpetuate the success of our business and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound business judgment using their diversity of experience in a number of areas. Each candidate must meet certain minimum qualifications, including:

The Nominating and Governance Committee may also consider the ability of the prospective candidate to work with the then-existing interpersonal dynamics of the Board and her or his ability to contribute to the collaborative culture among Board members.

2018 Proxy Statement    13

Based on this initial evaluation, the Nominating and Governance Committee will determine whether to interview the candidate, and, if warranted, will recommend that one or more of its members and senior management, as appropriate, interview the candidate in person or by telephone. After completing this evaluation and interview process, the Nominating and Governance Committee recommends to the Board a slate of director nominees for election at the next annual meeting of stockholders or for appointment to fill vacancies on the Board.

Information Regarding Meetings

During 2017, the Board of Directors held four meetings. The Audit Committee met four times, the Nominating and Governance Committee met twice and the Compensation Committee met twice. During 2017, all current directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and the total number of meetings of the committees of the Board of Directors held during the period of such director’s service.

We expect, but do not require, Board members to attend the annual meeting. Last year, all of our then-current Board members attended the annual meeting.

Stockholder Communications

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate directly with our independent directors by sending a written communication in an envelope addressed to “Board of Directors (Independent Members)” in care of the Corporate Secretary at the address indicated on the first page of this proxy statement.

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate directly with the Board of Directors by sending a written communication in an envelope addressed to “Board of Directors” in care of the Corporate Secretary at the address indicated on the first page of this proxy statement.

Website Availability of Governance Documents

You can access our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethical Practices, Audit Committee Charter, Nominating and Governance Committee Charter and Compensation Committee Charter on the Investors section of our website at www.dril-quip.com. Information contained on our website or any other website is not incorporated into this proxy statement and does not constitute a part of this proxy statement. Additionally, any stockholder who so requests may obtain a printed copy of the governance documents from the Corporate Secretary at the address indicated on the first page of this proxy statement.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee is comprised entirely of Messrs. Jupp, Lovoi, Shukis and Newman, each of whom is an independent director. None of the members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal year 2017 or as of the date of this proxy statement is or has been an officer or employee of Dril-Quip and no executive officer of Dril-Quip served on the compensation committee or board of any company that employed any member of Dril-Quip’s Compensation Committee or Board.

Policies and Procedures for Approval of Related Person Transactions

The Board has adopted a written policy implementing procedures for the review, approval or ratification of related person transactions. Under the policy, a “related person” is any director, executive officer or more than 5% stockholder. The policy applies to any transaction in which (1) we are a participant, (2) any related person has a direct or indirect material interest and (3) the amount involved exceeds $120,000, but excludes any transaction that does not require disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing, approving and ratifying any related person transaction. The Nominating and Governance Committee intends to approve only those related person transactions that are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of us and our stockholders.

14    2018 Proxy Statement

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

Employment Agreements with Executive Officers

On December 8, 2011, we entered into employment agreements with Blake T. DeBerry, President and Chief Executive Officer, James A. Gariepy, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Jerry M. Brooks, our former Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer, and James C. Webster, Vice President — General Counsel and Secretary. The following summary of the employment agreements does not purport to be complete and is qualified by reference to the form of the agreements, which have been filed with the SEC and may be obtained from the Corporate Secretary at the address indicated on the first page of this proxy statement.

Each employment agreement has an initial three-year term but automatically extends for one additional year on the third anniversary of the effective date and on each subsequent anniversary of the effective date. Pursuant to the employment agreements, each executive will receive an annual base salary at least equal to the annual base salary earned by such executive immediately prior to the effective date. In addition to an annual salary, each executive is eligible to receive an annual bonus to be determined each year in accordance with our normal bonus practices or under any annual bonus plan adopted by us after the effective date. Each executive is also entitled to paid vacation in accordance with the Company’s policies, to receive benefits consistent with our other senior executives, including medical, life and disability insurance, and to participate in our incentive, savings and retirement plans. Each employment agreement is subject to the right of the Company and each respective executive to terminate his employment at any time. The employment agreements provide certain benefits upon termination or change-in-control. For more information, see “Executive Compensation — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.”

In addition, each executive is subject to a perpetual covenant not to use or disclose our trade secrets or confidential information and, if the executive is terminated after the first anniversary of the effective date, non-competition and non-solicitation covenants during the term of his employment and for 12 months following his termination.

New Employment Agreements

On March 7, 2017, in connection with the appointment of Mr. Bird as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and Mr. Brooks, our former Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer, as Vice President of Investor Relations of the Company, we entered into (i) an employment agreement with Mr. Bird, effective March 13, 2017 (the “Bird Employment Agreement”), and (ii) an employment agreement with Mr. Brooks, effective March 13, 2017 with a one-year term until March 13, 2018 (the “New Brooks Employment Agreement”) that superseded his employment agreement dated December 8, 2011 described above. The following summaries of the Bird Employment Agreement and the New Brooks Employment Agreement do not purport to be complete and are qualified by reference to the forms of the agreements, which have been filed with the SEC and may be obtained from the Corporate Secretary at the address indicated on the first page of this proxy statement.

Bird Employment Agreement

The Bird Employment Agreement has an initial term until December 8, 2019 but automatically extends for one additional year on such date and on each subsequent anniversary of such date. Pursuant to the Bird Employment Agreement, Mr. Bird will receive an annual base salary, which is initially $450,000, which may be subject to increases (but not decreases), as determined by the Board. In addition to an annual salary, Mr. Bird is eligible to receive an annual bonus to be determined each year in accordance with our normal bonus practices or under any annual bonus plan adopted by us after the effective date. Mr. Bird is also entitled to 20 days paid vacation subject to the Company’s policies, to receive benefits consistent with our other senior executives, including medical, life and disability insurance, and to participate in our incentive, savings and retirement plans. Mr. Bird was also entitled to a cash sign-on bonus of $200,000 and an initial equity award with a grant date fair market value of $1,500,000 (the “Initial Equity Grant”) with (i) 50% of the Initial Equity Grant granted in the form of restricted stock that vests in one-third tranches on October 28th of each of 2017, 2018 and 2019,

2018 Proxy Statement    15

subject to continuous employment with the Company on such vesting dates, and (ii) the remaining 50% of the Initial Equity Grant in the form of performance-based stock units that vest on October 28, 2019 (based on the performance goals previously approved by the Compensation Committee for the performance period ending October 28, 2019), subject to continuous employment with the Company on such vesting date. The Bird Employment Agreement is subject to the right of the Company and Mr. Bird to terminate his employment at any time. If, prior to December 8, 2019, Mr. Bird’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by Mr. Bird for good reason (as defined in the Bird Employment Agreement), then with respect to the Initial Equity Grant, Mr. Bird will be entitled to (i) immediate vesting of all unvested shares of restricted stock and (ii) the vesting of the performance-based stock units based on actual results at the end of the relevant performance period and without any pro-rata adjustment for early termination, payable at the same time as if Mr. Bird had remained employed through the end of the applicable performance period.

In addition, Mr. Bird is subject to a perpetual covenant not to use or disclose our trade secrets or confidential information and, if Mr. Bird is terminated after the first anniversary of the effective date of the Bird Employment Agreement, non-competition and non-solicitation covenants during the term of his employment and for 12 months following his termination.

The Bird Employment Agreement provides certain benefits upon termination or change-in-control. For more information, see “Executive Compensation — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.”

New Brooks Employment Agreement

The New Brooks Employment Agreement was for a one-year term ending March 13, 2018, after which Mr. Brooks continued his employment with the Company as an “at will” employee until he retires on March 30, 2018. Pursuant to the New Brooks Employment Agreement, Mr. Brooks received an annual base salary of $305,000. In addition to an annual salary, Mr. Brooks received a bonus of $75,000 at the expiration of the one-year term of the New Brooks Employment Agreement. Mr. Brooks was also entitled to paid vacation in accordance with the Company’s policies, to receive benefits consistent with our other senior executives, including medical, life and disability insurance, and to participate in our savings and retirement plans.

In addition, Mr. Brooks is subject to a perpetual covenant not to use or disclose our trade secrets or confidential information and non-competition and non-solicitation covenants during the term of his employment and for 12 months following his termination.

The New Brooks Employment Agreement provided certain benefits upon termination or change-in-control, if such termination or change-in-control had occurred prior to the expiration of the term. For more information, see “Executive Compensation — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.”

16    2018 Proxy Statement

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Overview

The annual fee paid to the non-employee Chairman of the Board and the annual fee paid to the other non-employee directors were reduced by 10% from 2016, effective April 1, 2017. As a result, for the year ended December 31, 2017, the non-employee Chairman of the Board received an annual fee of $135,000 and the Company’s other non-employee directors received an annual fee of $67,500. In addition, the non-employee chairmen of the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee of the Board each received a supplemental annual fee of $10,000, and the non-employee chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board received a supplemental annual fee of $15,000. Further, the non-employee Chairman of the Board and the other non-employee directors received a fee of $1,000 for attendance at each Board of Directors meeting and $1,000 for each committee meeting. All directors are reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses and other expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board or its committees and for other expenses incurred in their capacity as directors.

Under the Company’s 2004 Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2004 Incentive Plan”), which was replaced by the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2017 Incentive Plan”), and the 2017 Incentive Plan, non-employee directors may be granted awards in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, cash awards or performance awards.

Stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors were adopted in May 2012. Under these guidelines, each non-employee director is expected to own Dril-Quip common stock valued at five times the then current annual cash retainer paid to such non-employee director. If, however, at any time the Chairman of the Board is a non-employee and is receiving a retainer greater than that paid to the non-employee directors who are not Chairman of the Board, the Chairman of the Board is generally expected to own common stock valued at five times the then current annual cash retainer paid to non-employee directors who are not Chairman of the Board. New directors are expected to attain the specified level of ownership within five years of becoming a director.

The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation paid to our non-employee directors for 2017:

2018 Proxy Statement    17

Assumptions used in the calculation of this amount are included in footnote 16 to our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2018.

Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board granted 2,698 shares of restricted stock to each of Messrs. Lovoi, Shukis, Jupp and Newman in October 2017 under the 2017 Incentive Plan.

Director Stock Compensation Program

In June 2014, the Board of Directors authorized a stock compensation program for non-employee directors pursuant to the 2004 Incentive Plan. This program continues under the 2017 Incentive Plan. Under this program, non-employee directors have the option to receive all or a portion of their board and committee fees (but not expenses) in the form of restricted stock awards in an amount equal to 125% of such fees in lieu of cash. Each director may elect to take fees in the form of restricted stock prior to the beginning of the subject calendar year. Each director taking fees in the form of restricted stock receives his award attributable to a calendar quarter on or about the first business day of the next calendar quarter in an amount equal to 125% of the cash equivalent of his fees, with the number of shares determined by the stock price on the last trading day of the calendar quarter for which the fees are being determined. These awards fully vest on the first day of the second calendar year following issuance. The director stock compensation program is intended to encourage non-employee directors to acquire and hold common stock of the Company to align the interests of directors and the Company’s other stockholders. Messrs. Lovoi, Shukis, Jupp and Newman each elected to take all or a portion of their Board fees in the form of restricted stock during 2017, and each has elected to do so again in 2018.

18    2018 Proxy Statement

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

The primary objectives of our compensation programs are to attract and retain talented executive officers and to deliver rewards for superior corporate performance. We had five named executive officers in 2017: Mr. DeBerry, our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Gariepy, our Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Bird, our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Webster, our General Counsel, and Mr. Brooks, who served as our Chief Financial Officer until stepping down from that position on March 13, 2017. The compensation of our named executive officers was at the discretion of the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) and was governed in part by employment agreements entered into with those executives. The employment agreements are described under “Related Person Transactions — Employment Agreements with Executive Officers,” “Related Person Transactions — New Employment Agreements” and “— Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.”

Purpose of the Executive Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program has been designed to accomplish the following objectives:

Administration of Executive Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program is administered by the Committee. The specific duties and responsibilities of the Committee are described in this proxy statement under “Corporate Governance Matters — Committees of the Board of Directors — Compensation Committee.” The Committee normally meets each February to set cash bonuses earned during the prior year and to establish performance targets for the annual incentive compensation plan. The Committee also normally meets in October to determine base salaries for our executive officers and award equity-based compensation. The Committee also meets at other times during the year and acts by written consent when necessary or appropriate.

Our Chief Executive Officer provides recommendations on the base salaries of our other executive officers. Our Chief Executive Officer also periodically reviews and recommends specific performance metrics to be used for determining our annual cash incentive payments. These recommendations are then presented to the Committee for its consideration and approval. Our Chief Executive Officer bases his recommendations on a variety of factors such as his appraisal of the executive’s job performance and contribution to the Company, improvement in organizational and employee development and accomplishment of strategic priorities. Our Chief Executive Officer does not make any recommendations regarding his own compensation.

2017 Compensation Highlights

Compensation determinations made for 2017 reflect our pay-for-performance philosophy and the Company’s intent to align compensation paid to our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. The key compensation determinations made with respect to our named executive officers for 2017 are summarized as follows:

2018 Proxy Statement    19

The ultimate value realized by our long-term compensation grants is heavily influenced by the performance of our stock, both on an absolute basis and relative to the Philadelphia Oil Service Index. The following chart compares the realizable value (as defined below) of long-term compensation grants made during the three-year period beginning on October 1, 2014 and ending on September 30, 2017 to the original grant date fair market value of such grants for each named executive officer.

20    2018 Proxy Statement

2018 Compensation Highlights

The Committee made significant adjustments to the annual cash incentives program for 2018 to better align compensation with the Company’s objectives for 2018. The main changes are as follows:

These changes are discussed in more detail below under “—  Elements of Compensation — Annual Cash Incentive Compensation.”

Role of Consultants

The Committee has the authority to engage a third-party consultant at any time. Since October 2011, the Committee has engaged a third-party consultant, Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”), to provide independent advice on executive compensation and evaluate and recommend appropriate modifications to our compensation program consistent with our program’s objectives. Meridian reports directly to the Committee, which pre-approves the scope of work and the fees charged. The Committee reviewed and assessed Meridian’s independence and performance in order to confirm that it was independent and met all applicable regulatory requirements. No other services were provided to us by Meridian in 2017.

In October 2017, at the direction of the Committee, Meridian evaluated the base salary and short-term and long-term incentive compensation of our named executive officers. As it had done in prior years for the Committee, Meridian used publicly available data from a peer group of oilfield service companies to assist in that analysis.

The peer group data used in October 2017 in relation to compensation for the Company’s named executive officers for 2017 was the same peer group used by Meridian in its October 2016 report to the Committee except that TETRA Technologies, Inc. replaced Gulfmark Offshore, Inc. With that change, the peer group consisted of the following 12 publicly traded oilfield services and equipment companies:

This peer group of companies represents a group of companies in the oilfield services industry of comparable size to Dril-Quip based on measures such as enterprise value, revenues, market capitalization and assets. We believe that the use of this group as a reference for evaluating our compensation policies helps align us with our peers and competitors and ensure our compensation program remains competitive when compared to our competition for executive talent. We also believe this group of companies provides a sufficiently large data set that is generally not subject to wide changes in compensation data.

2018 Proxy Statement    21

Pursuant to Meridian’s recommendations and its own analysis, the Committee has implemented the compensation program for our named executive officers as further described below.

Elements of Compensation

General

Our executive compensation program generally consists of the following elements:

We primarily seek to reward achievement of our short-term goals with base salary and annual cash incentive compensation, while long-term interests are rewarded through long-term equity awards. We believe that base salaries should be at levels competitive with peer companies that compete with us for business opportunities and executive talent, and annual cash bonuses and long-term stock-based incentive awards should be at levels which reflect progress toward our corporate goals and individual performance. In general, salary level and annual and long-term incentive compensation for each named executive officer are based on market data for the officer’s position. Compensation levels can vary compared to the market due to a variety of factors such as experience, scope of responsibilities, tenure and individual performance.

Relative Size of Major Compensation Elements

The relative sizes of the components of an executive’s compensation are determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, often with reference to recommendations by third-party consultants. Pursuant to their employment agreements, however, the Committee may not reduce the salary of our named executive officers without their consent.

Factors taken into account in determining compensation for all executive officers are our performance and the executive’s responsibilities, experience, leadership, potential future contributions and demonstrated individual performance. The Committee seeks to achieve the appropriate balance between immediate cash rewards for the achievement of company-wide and personal objectives and long-term incentives that align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. In setting executive compensation, the Committee considers the aggregate compensation payable to an executive officer and the form of the compensation. The Committee also considered the results of the 2017 advisory vote on executive compensation and, based upon the strong stockholder support, believes that its approach to executive compensation is appropriate.

22    2018 Proxy Statement

The following charts summarize the relative size of base salary and incentive compensation for 2017 for each of our named executive officers:

Base Salary

We evaluate base salaries for our named executive officers annually or as warranted by circumstances. The base salaries for our Chief Executive Officer and our other executive officers are reviewed and approved by the Committee. Our Chief Executive Officer provides recommendations on adjustments to the base salary of our other executive officers. Base salary recognizes the job being performed and the value of that job in the competitive market. Base salary must be sufficient to attract and retain the executive talent necessary for our continued success and provide an element of compensation that is not at risk in order to avoid fluctuations in compensation that could distract our executives from the performance of their responsibilities.

Base salaries for our named executive officers are based on a review of numerous factors, including our financial and operating performance during the relevant period and the executive officer’s experience level and contribution to our success. Salary determinations are subjective and are not based on any formula. The Committee and the Chief Executive Officer, as applicable, make an assessment of our actual financial results compared to our overall annual budget based on the financial statements as a whole, taking into account market and economic conditions unknown during the preparation of the relevant annual budgets. Among other items, the Committee and the Chief Executive Officer compare our actual revenues and expenses, operating income, net income and earnings per share to the budgeted amounts for these items. In addition, annual adjustments to base salary also reflect changes or responses to changes in market data.

In October 2016, the Committee met to review the overall compensation of the named executive officers based on their positions and performance, and in relation to the compensation provided to executives at the Company’s peers. In connection with that review, the Committee decided to leave the salaries of Messrs. DeBerry, Gariepy, Brooks and Webster unchanged at the 2015 levels of $680,000, $625,000, $395,000 and $355,000, respectively, to reflect the continued softening of the industry environment and the Company’s business outlook.

2018 Proxy Statement    23

In January 2017, each named executive officer voluntarily agreed to a 10% reduction in his base salary to $612,000, $562,500, $355,500, $319,500 for Messrs. DeBerry, Gariepy, Brooks and Webster, respectively, effective January 30, 2017, based upon a proposal of the Chief Executive Officer, which was approved by the Committee. The reduction was made as part of an overall reduction of wages for employees worldwide in an effort to reduce the Company’s operating costs to fit the current market conditions and the Company’s decreased revenue as operators continue to defer projects. In March 2017, Mr. Bird was appointed as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with a base salary of $450,000, and Mr. Brooks was appointed Vice President of Investor Relations with a base salary of $305,000. In October 2017, the Committee decided to leave the salaries of Messrs. DeBerry, Gariepy, Bird, Brooks and Webster unchanged at the 2017 levels.

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation

Our annual incentive compensation award provides an annual cash award that is designed to link each employee’s annual compensation to the achievement of annual performance objectives for the Company, as well as to recognize the employee’s performance during the year.

2017 Awards. In February 2017, the Committee approved cash bonus criteria under our STIP for executive officers for their performance in 2017 (the “2017 Bonus Criteria”). Under the terms of the 2017 Bonus Criteria, each executive’s bonus award for 2017 performance was calculated based on

To focus more on cash flow, the Committee changed the EBIT Element table for 2016 to an EBITDA Element table for 2017. In addition, the Committee increased the minimum threshold for payout in the EBITDA Element to 95%, which had been 85% in the EBIT Element table used in 2016. The maximum payout under the 2017 Bonus Criteria was 180% of target for all of our named executive officers.

To further focus management on generating positive cash flow, the Committee added Free Cash Flow as a third performance criteria in 2017 and set an aggressive target by providing a threshold of 90% of the budgeted amount of Free Cash Flow. At the beginning of 2017, our Chief Executive Officer proposed, and the Committee approved, our budget for 2017, including EBITDA, Book to Bill Ratio and Free Cash Flow. In addition, certain personal objectives were established for our executive officers. EBITDA, Book to Bill Ratio and Free Cash Flow were chosen by the Committee as the relevant Company performance metrics for the 2017 annual cash incentive awards. Our EBITDA, Book to Bill Ratio and Free Cash Flow for 2017 were calculated by our Chief Financial Officer, based upon our audited financial statements, and presented to the Committee in early 2018. The Committee reviewed the calculations as prepared by our Chief Financial Officer and

24    2018 Proxy Statement

determined the applicable performance percentages for purposes of determining the amount of the bonus in accordance with the following pre-determined threshold, target and maximum amounts:

The bonus amounts were determined by multiplying the dollar amount of each executive officer’s incentive target by (i) the appropriate EBITDA Bonus Target Multiplier, and then multiplying that product by 40% (“2017 EBITDA Payout”), (ii) the appropriate Book to Bill Target Multiplier, and then multiplying that product by 30% (“2017 Book to Bill Payout”), and (iii) the appropriate Free Cash Flow Multiplier, and then multiplying that product by 30% (“2017 Free Cash Flow Payout”). Interpolation was used for determining the EBITDA Bonus Target Multiplier but not for determining the Book to Bill Multiplier or the Free Cash Flow Multiplier. The sum of the 2017 EBITDA Payout, the 2017 Book to Bill Payout and the 2017 Free Cash Flow Payout was then subject to reduction by up to 30% for personal objectives that were not satisfied. The determination of whether personal objectives was satisfied was at the discretion of our Chief Executive Officer and the Committee for our Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel, and at the discretion of the Committee for our Chief Executive Officer.

Based on our performance in 2017, the Committee determined the Free Cash Flow Multiplier to be 200% based upon the Company’s actual Free Cash Flow for 2017 being over 400% of its targeted Free Cash Flow for 2017. The Company failed to meet the threshold for any payout on the EBITDA Element and the Book to Bill Ratio Element. After any adjustment for the performance of our executive officers based on the achievement of their personal objectives in 2017, in February 2018, the Committee awarded bonuses to Messrs. DeBerry, Gariepy, Bird and Webster in the amounts of $367,200, $317,300, $256,000 and $143,800, respectively, for their performance in 2017. Mr. Bird’s bonus is comprised of $197,300 calculated on a pro rata basis since his appointment as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective March 13, 2017, plus an additional discretionary amount of $58,700 based on his performance during 2017 in the achievement of certain Company initiatives. Mr. Brooks was not eligible to receive an annual incentive compensation award for 2017, but received a cash bonus of $75,000 at the expiration of the one-year term of the New Brooks Employment Agreement in March 2018.

2018 Awards. In February 2018, the Committee approved cash bonus criteria under our STIP for executive officers for their performance in 2018 (the “2018 Bonus Criteria”). Under the terms of the 2018 Bonus Criteria, each executive’s bonus award for 2018 performance will be calculated based on

2018 Proxy Statement    25

The Committee made no changes to the executive officers’ annual cash bonus target amounts for 2018.

To focus more on bookings, the Committee increased the percentage that the Book to Bill Ratio Element comprises of the 2018 Bonus Criteria from 30% to 60%. In addition, the Committee removed Free Cash Flow as a performance criteria because the Company improved its cash management processes in 2017, which in turn caused it to achieve its cash flow objectives by reducing inventory and collecting on accounts receivable. In addition, the EBITDA Element will allow for continued focus on cash flow. The maximum payout under the 2018 Bonus Criteria is 180% of target for all of our named executive officers.

At the beginning of 2018, our Chief Executive Officer proposed, and the Committee approved, our budget for 2018, including EBITDA and Book to Bill Ratio. In addition, certain personal objectives have been established for our executive officers. EBITDA and Book to Bill Ratio were chosen by the Committee as the relevant Company performance metrics for the 2018 annual cash incentive awards. Our EBITDA and Book to Bill Ratio for 2018 will be calculated by our Chief Financial Officer and presented to the Committee in early 2019. The Committee will review the calculations as prepared by our Chief Financial Officer and determine the applicable performance percentages for purposes of determining the amount of the bonus in accordance with the following threshold, target and maximum amounts:

The bonus amounts will be determined by multiplying the dollar amount of each executive officer’s incentive target by (i) the appropriate EBITDA Bonus Target Multiplier, and then multiplying that product by 40% (“2018 EBITDA Payout”) and (ii) the appropriate Book to Bill Target Multiplier, and then multiplying that product by 60% (“2018 Book to Bill Payout”). Interpolation will be used for determining the EBITDA Bonus Target Multiplier and the Book to Bill Multiplier. The sum of the 2018 EBITDA Payout and the 2018 Book to Bill Payout is then subject to reduction by up to 30% for personal objectives that are not satisfied. Our Committee may use its discretion to reduce the 2018 EBITDA Payout or the 2018 Book to Bill Payout prior to the determination of the extent to which any personal objectives have been met. The determination of whether personal objectives are satisfied will be at the discretion of our Chief Executive Officer and the Committee for our Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel, and at the discretion of the Committee for our Chief Executive Officer.

26    2018 Proxy Statement

Long-Term Stock-Based Incentive Compensation

In 2017, the division of awards under our 2017 Incentive Plan between restricted stock and performance units at target was as follows:

Restricted Stock Grants. The Committee is responsible for restricted stock grants under our 2017 Incentive Plan. The Committee approves the grant of restricted stock at meetings of the Committee, and generally does not grant restricted stock by written consent. The Committee establishes an award for our named executive officers and a total number of awards for non-executive employees and delegates to the Chief Executive Officer the distribution of such awards to our non-executive employees. Historically, our grants of equity compensation have been made on October 28, the anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering.

In determining the amount, if any, of restricted stock granted to our named executive officers and our other key employees, the Committee considers numerous factors, including, among others, the following:

Based on these considerations, the Committee awarded Mr. DeBerry with 31,325 shares of restricted stock, Mr. Gariepy with 28,313 shares of restricted stock, Mr. Bird with 10,843 shares of restricted stock and Mr. Webster with 10,843 shares of restricted stock in October 2017. Mr. Brooks was not eligible for restricted stock grants pursuant to the New Brooks Employment Agreement.

Performance Units. The Committee also elected to grant to our current named executive officers shares of performance units in October 2017 under the 2017 Incentive Plan. The Committee believes that the performance unit awards better align executive performance with stockholder interests and focus the officers on long-term performance as the performance units vest over three-year intervals. Under the plan, participants may earn from 0% to 200% of their target number of shares based upon the Company’s relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) to the 15 component companies of the Philadelphia Oil Service Index. The TSR is calculated over a 3-year period from October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2020.

The Committee considered the same factors enumerated above for its grant of performance units. Based on these considerations, the Committee awarded Mr. DeBerry with 31,325 performance units, Mr. Gariepy with 28,313 performance units, Mr. Bird with 10,843 performance units and Mr. Webster with 10,843 performance units. The Committee determined that it was appropriate to grant each executive officer awards in an equal number of performance units and restricted stock shares to balance the objectives of retention and performance. Mr. Brooks is not eligible for performance unit awards pursuant to the New Brooks Employment Agreement.

2018 Proxy Statement    27

Stock Options. The Committee last awarded stock options to named executive officers in October 2011. At that time, the Committee engaged Meridian to evaluate and recommend appropriate modifications to our compensation program consistent with our program’s objectives. Meridian completed its report in November 2011 and, pursuant to Meridian’s recommendations and after internal deliberation, the Committee elected to discontinue the use of stock options as an incentive tool in favor of restricted stock and performance unit awards, which more closely aligns the Company with its market peers.

Other Benefits

We provide our executive officers with other personal benefits that we believe are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program.

The employment agreements of our named executive officers provide certain benefits upon termination which are described under “— Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control.” We believe these benefits are consistent with those awarded by our peer group and are beneficial in retaining executives. These benefits are also intended to help ensure each named executive officer’s continued full attention to our business needs in the event we were to become the subject of the types of change in control transactions described in the agreements.

We seek to provide benefit plans, such as medical, life and disability insurance, in line with market conditions. Executive officers are eligible for the same benefit plans provided to other employees, including insurance plans and supplemental plans chosen and paid for by employees who wish additional coverage. We do not have any special insurance plans for executive officers.

Post-Employment Benefits

We make contributions to the Dril-Quip, Inc. 401(k) Plan, which is a voluntary and contributory plan for eligible employees. Our contributions, which are based on a percentage of matching employee contributions, totaled approximately $2.95 million in 2017, which includes an aggregate of $49,897 for our named executive officers’ benefit.

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

To align the interests of our executive officers and stockholders, executive officers should have a significant financial stake in the Company. To further that goal, the Board adopted, effective as of May 10, 2012, the stock ownership guidelines described below for our executive officers. These guidelines were implemented following evaluation of peer group proxy disclosure data and review by the Compensation Committee and its compensation consultant. Under the guidelines, our Chief Executive Officer should own Dril-Quip common stock having a market value of five times base salary, our senior vice presidents should own Dril-Quip common stock having a market value of four times base salary and our other executive officers should own Dril-Quip common stock having a market value of three times their respective base salaries.

For purposes of the guidelines, the ownership requirement is determined based on the executive’s current base salary. The base salary multiple amount is converted to a fixed number of shares using the average closing price of our common stock for the prior calendar year.

In addition to shares owned outright, equivalent shares held in our retirement plan, unvested restricted stock awards, the target number of unvested performance stock units, and shares held by immediate family members of the executive officer residing in the same household are counted towards the guidelines. Newly hired or recently promoted officers are given a period of five years from such hiring or promotion to comply with these guidelines. The Compensation Committee reviews our executive officers’ stock holdings annually to monitor compliance with these guidelines. As of the date hereof, each of our executive officers is in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines.

28    2018 Proxy Statement

Hedging and Pledging Policy

We have also adopted a policy, effective as of February 19, 2015, prohibiting directors and executive officers from entering into speculative transactions in our common stock. The hedging policy prohibits the purchase or sale of puts, calls, options or other derivative securities based on our common stock by directors or executive officers. We also prohibit hedging or monetization transactions, such as forward sale contracts, in which the director or executive officer continues to own the underlying common stock without all the risks or rewards of ownership, and the pledging by directors or executive officers of our common stock as collateral for a loan or for any other purpose.

Impact of Accounting and Tax Treatments

Accounting Treatment

Under ASC 718, we recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of those awards. Restricted stock awards are measured based on the fair value of the stock at the date of grant. We valued the performance unit awards using a Monte Carlo simulation model based on probable achievement level of the underlying performance conditions as of the grant date.

Tax Treatment

Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the Chief Executive Officer and certain other executive officers (“covered employees”). However, for 2017 and prior years, any compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and covered employees that met the requirements of qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) was not subject to this deduction limitation. Following the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”), beginning with the 2018 calendar year, the $1 million annual deduction limitation under Section 162(m) applies to compensation paid to any individual who serves as the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer or qualifies as one of the other three most highly compensated executive officers in 2017 or any later calendar year; there is no longer any exception for qualified performance-based compensation. Our 2017 annual cash bonus awards and 2017 performance unit awards (along with our 2016 and 2015 performance unit awards) are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). Although we can provide no assurance given the current lack of guidance from the Internal Revenue Service on the matter, we believe the TCJA transition rules for binding contracts in effect on November 2, 2017 should continue to allow our performance unit awards that will be paid after 2017 to maintain their exemption from the $1 million annual deduction limitation for so long as such grants are not materially modified (“grandfathered amounts”). Our general policy, where consistent with business objectives, has been to preserve the deductibility of compensation to executive officers, but we could authorize forms of compensation that might not be deductible if we believe they are in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders. Our time-vested restricted stock awards are not considered performance-based under Section 162(m) and, accordingly, are subject to the $1 million limit on deductibility. All or a portion of the value, when vested, of these restricted stock awards may not be deductible.

For periods after 2017, without the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m), it is expected that any compensation deductions (other than grandfathered amounts) for any individual who is our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or one of our other three most highly compensated executive officers in 2017 or any later year will be subject to a $1 million annual deduction limitation. Although the deductibility of compensation is a consideration evaluated by the Committee, the Committee believes that the lost deduction on compensation payable in excess of the $1 million limitation for the named executive officers is not material relative to the benefit of being able to attract and retain talented management. Accordingly, the Committee will continue to retain the discretion to pay compensation that is subject to the $1 million deductibility limit.

2018 Proxy Statement    29

Stockholder Advisory “Say-on-Pay” Vote

At our 2018 annual meeting, we are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” vote. This vote provides our stockholders the opportunity to express their views regarding the compensation program for our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. As an advisory vote, the say-on-pay vote at our 2018 annual meeting will not be binding upon the Company or the Board of Directors. However, the Board of Directors values the opinions expressed by our stockholders, and the Committee will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers. For additional information, please refer to “Proposal 3: Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation” beginning on page 47.

The advisory vote at our 2018 annual meeting will be our eighth “say-on-pay” vote. We conducted a say-on-pay vote at our 2017 annual meeting at which an advisory resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in our proxy statement for such annual meeting, was approved by approximately 96% of the shares that were voted either for or against the resolution (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes). We have considered the favorable results of this vote, and the Committee has not made any changes to our overall executive compensation program as a direct result of the vote.

At our 2017 annual meeting, we also conducted an advisory vote on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation, at which the Board of Directors recommended that our stockholders vote in favor of holding annual say-on-pay votes instead of the other options presented. At our 2017 annual meeting, approximately 93% of the shares that were voted in favor of one of the three available frequency recommendations (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes) voted in favor of an annual frequency, a minimal number of shares were voted in favor of holding future votes once every two years, and approximately 7% voted in favor of holding future votes once every three years. In May 2017, we disclosed that, in accordance with the results of the advisory vote, we intend to hold future say-on-pay votes annually until we next hold an advisory vote on the frequency of say-on-pay votes as required under SEC rules.

30    2018 Proxy Statement

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of the Board has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

2018 Proxy Statement    31

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation of Mr. DeBerry, our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Gariepy, our Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Bird, our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Webster, our General Counsel, and Mr. Brooks, who served as our Chief Financial Officer until stepping down from that position on March 13, 2017 (collectively, the “named executive officers”), for services rendered in all capacities during 2015, 2016 and 2017:

32    2018 Proxy Statement

CEO Pay Ratio

The table below sets forth comparative information regarding:

For purposes of determining the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries, excluding our Chief Executive Officer, for the year ended December 31, 2017, the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules require us to identify the median employee, by using either annual total compensation for all such employees or another consistently applied compensation measure. In identifying the median employee, we:

2018 Proxy Statement    33

After identifying the median employee based on the process described above, we calculated annual total compensation for that employee using the same methodology we used for determining total compensation for 2017 for our named executive officers as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.

Given the global distribution of our employee population, we use a variety of pay elements to structure the compensation arrangements of our employees. We believe that the sum of annual base salary, bonus and the aggregate grant date fair value of equity-based incentive compensation awards is an appropriate, consistently applied compensation measure that provides a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Securities and Exchange Commission rules based on our payroll and finance records and the methodology described above. Because the Securities and Exchange Commission rules for identifying the median employee allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

34    2018 Proxy Statement

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table contains information with respect to the grant of plan-based awards during 2017.

2018 Proxy Statement    35

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information concerning the outstanding stock option, restricted stock and performance unit awards made to each named executive officer as of December 31, 2017: