United States

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017

OR

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____ to ____

Commission File Number: 1-12378

NVR, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

11700 Plaza America Drive, Suite 500

Reston, Virginia 20190

(703) 956-4000

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)

(Not Applicable)

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for companying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of July 24, 2017 there were 3,743,620 total shares of common stock outstanding.

---

 

---

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.Financial Statements

NVR, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)

 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

---

 

NVR, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

---

 

NVR, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

3

---

NVR, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars and shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

The accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NVR, Inc. (“NVR” or the “Company”) and its subsidiaries and certain other entities in which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary (see Notes 2 and 3 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements).  Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.  The statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.  Because the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP, they should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals except as otherwise noted herein) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

On January 1, 2017, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation:  Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.  In connection with the adoption of ASU 2016-09, the Company:

No other adjustments were made as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09.

The Company also adopted ASU 2015-11, Inventory – Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory effective January 1, 2017.  The standard requires inventory to be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value.  Under prior GAAP, impaired inventory was written down to net realizable value less a normal profit margin.  Under the new standard, impaired inventory will only be written down to the net realizable value. ASU 2015-11 was adopted prospectively and did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, comprehensive income equaled net income; therefore, a separate statement of comprehensive income is not included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

4

---

NVR, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars and shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

Fixed Price Finished Lot Purchase Agreements (“Lot Purchase Agreements”)

NVR generally does not engage in the land development business.  Instead, the Company typically acquires finished building lots at market prices from various development entities under Lot Purchase Agreements.  The Lot Purchase Agreements require deposits that may be forfeited if NVR fails to perform under the Lot Purchase Agreements.  The deposits required under the Lot Purchase Agreements are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts, and typically range up to 10% of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots.

NVR believes this lot acquisition strategy reduces the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and land development.  NVR may, at its option, choose for any reason and at any time not to perform under these Lot Purchase Agreements by delivering notice of its intent not to acquire the finished lots under contract.  NVR’s sole legal obligation and economic loss for failure to perform under these Lot Purchase Agreements is limited to the amount of the deposit pursuant to the liquidated damage provisions contained within the Lot Purchase Agreements.  In other words, if NVR does not perform under a Lot Purchase Agreement, NVR loses only its deposit.  None of the creditors of any of the development entities with which NVR enters Lot Purchase Agreements have recourse to the general credit of NVR.  NVR generally does not have any specific performance obligations to purchase a certain number or any of the lots, nor does NVR guarantee completion of the development by the developer or guarantee any of the developers’ financial or other liabilities.

NVR is not involved in the design or creation of the development entities from which the Company purchases lots under Lot Purchase Agreements.  The developer’s equity holders have the power to direct 100% of the operating activities of the development entity.  NVR has no voting rights in any of the development entities.  The sole purpose of the development entity’s activities is to generate positive cash flow returns for the equity holders.  Further, NVR does not share in any of the profit or loss generated by the project’s development.  The profits and losses are passed directly to the developer’s equity holders.

The deposit placed by NVR pursuant to the Lot Purchase Agreement is deemed to be a variable interest in the respective development entities.  Those development entities are deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIE”).  Therefore, the development entities with which NVR enters into Lot Purchase Agreements, including the joint venture limited liability corporations discussed below, are evaluated for possible consolidation by NVR.  An enterprise must consolidate a VIE when that enterprise has a controlling financial interest in the VIE.  An enterprise is deemed to have a controlling financial interest if it has (i) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance, and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could be significant to the VIE or the rights to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE.

NVR believes the activities that most significantly impact a development entity’s economic performance are the operating activities of the entity.  The development entity’s equity investors bear the full risk during the development process. Unless and until a development entity completes finished building lots through the development process, the entity does not earn any revenues.  The operating development activities are managed solely by the development entity’s equity investors.

The development entities with which NVR contracts to buy finished lots typically select the respective projects, obtain the necessary zoning approvals, obtain the financing required with no support or guarantees from NVR, select who will purchase the finished lots and at what price, and manage the completion of the infrastructure improvements, all for the purpose of generating a cash flow return to the development entity’s equity holders and all independent of NVR.  The Company possesses no more than limited protective legal rights through the Lot Purchase Agreement in the specific finished lots that it is purchasing, and NVR possesses no participative rights in the development entities.  Accordingly, NVR does not have the power to direct the activities of a developer that most significantly impact the developer’s economic performance.  For this reason, NVR has concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of the development entities with which the Company enters into Lot Purchase Agreements, and therefore, NVR does not consolidate any of these VIEs.

5

---

NVR, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars and shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

As of June 30, 2017, NVR controlled approximately 79,100 lots under Lot Purchase Agreements with third parties through deposits in cash and letters of credit totaling approximately $380,900 and $2,400, respectively.  As noted above, NVR’s sole legal obligation and economic loss for failure to perform under these Lot Purchase Agreements is limited to the amount of the deposit pursuant to the liquidated damage provisions contained in the Lot Purchase Agreements.

In addition, NVR has certain properties under contract with land owners that are expected to yield approximately 8,400 lots, which are not included in the number of total lots controlled.  Some of these properties may require rezoning or other approvals to achieve the expected yield. These properties are controlled with deposits in cash and letters of credit totaling approximately $11,600 and $200, respectively, as of June 30, 2017, of which approximately $5,500 is refundable if certain contractual conditions are not met.  NVR generally expects to assign the raw land contracts to a land developer and simultaneously enter into a Lot Purchase Agreement with the assignee if the project is determined to be feasible.

NVR’s total risk of loss related to contract land deposits as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was as follows:

 

 

 

 

On a limited basis, NVR obtains finished lots using joint venture limited liability corporations (“JVs”). The JVs are typically structured such that NVR is a non-controlling member and is at risk only for the amount the Company has invested, or has committed to invest, in addition to any deposits placed under Lot Purchase Agreements with the joint venture. NVR is not a borrower, guarantor or obligor on any debt of the JVs, as applicable. The Company enters into Lot Purchase Agreements to purchase lots from these JVs, and as a result has a variable interest in these JVs.

At June 30, 2017, the Company had an aggregate investment totaling approximately $44,000 in six JVs that are expected to produce approximately 7,350 finished lots, of which approximately 4,050 lots were controlled by the Company and the remaining approximately 3,300 lots were either under contract with unrelated parties or not currently under contract. In addition, NVR had additional funding commitments totaling approximately $5,800 in the aggregate to three of the JVs at June 30, 2017. The Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of five of the JVs because either NVR and the other JV partner share power or the other JV partner has the controlling financial interest. The aggregate investment in unconsolidated JVs was approximately $43,600 and $49,000 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and is reported in the “Other assets” line item on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. For the remaining JV, NVR has concluded that it is the primary beneficiary because the Company has the controlling financial interest in the JV.

6

---

NVR, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars and shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

The condensed balance sheets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 of the consolidated JV were as follows:

 

 

The Company recognizes income from the JVs as a reduction to the lot cost of the lots purchased from the respective JVs when the homes are settled and is based on the expected total profitability and the total number of lots expected to be produced by the respective JVs. Distributions received from the unconsolidated JVs are allocated between return of capital and distributions of earnings based on the ratio of capital contributed by NVR to the total expected returns for the respective JVs, and are classified within the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of cash flows as cash flows from investing activities and operating activities, respectively.

 

On a limited basis, NVR directly acquires raw land parcels already zoned for its intended use to develop into finished lots.  Land under development includes the land acquisition costs, direct improvement costs, capitalized interest where applicable, and real estate taxes.

In January 2017, the Company purchased a raw land parcel for approximately $14,400.  The parcel is expected to produce approximately 90 lots.

As of June 30, 2017, NVR directly owned a total of four separate raw land parcels with a carrying value of $46,685 that are expected to produce approximately 550 finished lots. The Company also has additional funding commitments of approximately $10,000 under a joint development agreement related to one parcel, a portion of which the Company expects will be offset by development credits of approximately $5,400.

None of the raw parcels had any indicators of impairment as of June 30, 2017. Based on market conditions, NVR may on a limited basis continue to directly acquire additional raw parcels to develop into finished lots.

 

7

---

NVR, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars and shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

The Company capitalizes interest costs to land under development during the active development of finished lots.  In addition, the Company capitalizes interest costs to its joint venture investments while the investments are considered qualified assets pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification 835-20, Interest. Capitalized interest is transferred to sold or unsold inventory as the development of finished lots is completed, then charged to cost of sales upon the Company’s settlement of homes and the respective lots.  Interest incurred in excess of the interest capitalizable based on the level of qualified assets is expensed in the period incurred. NVR’s interest costs incurred, capitalized, expensed and charged to cost of sales during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:

 

 

 

 

The following weighted average shares and share equivalents were used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:

 

 

The following stock options and restricted share units issued under equity incentive plans were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

 

 

 

8

---

NVR, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars and shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

A summary of changes in shareholders’ equity is presented below:

 

 

 

The Company repurchased 84 shares of its common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2017. The Company settles stock option exercises and vesting of restricted share units by issuing shares of treasury stock.  Approximately 138 shares were issued from the treasury account during the six months ended June 30, 2017 in settlement of stock option exercises and vesting of restricted share units.  Shares are relieved from the treasury account based on the weighted average cost basis of treasury shares acquired.

 

 

The Company establishes warranty and product liability reserves (“Warranty Reserve”) to provide for estimated future expenses as a result of construction and product defects, product recalls and litigation incidental to NVR’s homebuilding business.  Liability estimates are determined based on management’s judgment, considering such factors as historical experience, the likely current cost of corrective action, manufacturers’ and subcontractors’ participation in sharing the cost of corrective action, consultations with third party experts such as engineers, and discussions with the Company’s general counsel and outside counsel retained to handle specific product liability cases.  The following table reflects the changes in the Company’s Warranty Reserve during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:

 

 

 

The following disclosure includes four homebuilding reportable segments that aggregate geographically the Company’s homebuilding operating segments, and the mortgage banking operations presented as a single reportable segment.  The homebuilding reportable segments are comprised of operating divisions in the following geographic areas:

 

9

---

NVR, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars and shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

Homebuilding profit before tax includes all revenues and income generated from the sale of homes, less the cost of homes sold, selling, general and administrative expenses and a corporate capital allocation charge.  The corporate capital allocation charge is eliminated in consolidation and is based on the segment’s average net assets employed.  The corporate capital allocation charged to the operating segment allows the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) to determine whether the operating segment’s results are providing the desired rate of return after covering the Company’s cost of capital.  In addition, certain assets, including goodwill and intangible assets and consolidation adjustments as discussed further below, are not allocated to the operating segments as those assets are neither included in the operating segment’s corporate capital allocation charge, nor in the CODM’s evaluation of the operating segment’s performance.  The Company records charges on contract land deposits when it is determined that it is probable that recovery of the deposit is impaired.  For segment reporting purposes, impairments on contract land deposits are charged to the operating segment upon the determination to terminate a Lot Purchase Agreement with the developer, or to restructure a Lot Purchase Agreement resulting in the forfeiture of the deposit.  Mortgage banking profit before tax consists of revenues generated from mortgage financing, title insurance and closing services, less the costs of such services and general and administrative costs.  Mortgage banking operations are not charged a corporate capital allocation charge.

In addition to the corporate capital allocation and contract land deposit impairments discussed above, the other reconciling items between segment profit and consolidated profit before tax include unallocated corporate overhead (including all management incentive compensation), equity-based compensation expense, consolidation adjustments and external corporate interest expense.  NVR’s overhead functions, such as accounting, treasury and human resources, are centrally performed and the costs are not allocated to the Company’s operating segments.  Consolidation adjustments consist of such items necessary to convert the reportable segments’ results, which are predominantly maintained on a cash basis, to a full accrual basis for external financial statement presentation purposes, and are not allocated to the Company’s operating segments.  External corporate interest expense primarily consists of interest charges on the Company’s 3.95% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “Senior Notes”) and is not charged to the operating segments because the charges are included in the corporate capital allocation discussed above.

The following tables present segment revenues, profit and assets, with reconciliations to the amounts reported for the consolidated enterprise, where applicable:

 

 

10

---

NVR, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars and shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

---

NVR, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars and shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

 

GAAP assigns a fair value hierarchy to the inputs used to measure fair value.  Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.  Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs.

Financial Instruments

The estimated fair value of NVR’s Senior Notes as of June 30, 2017 was $630,000.  The estimated fair value is based on recent market prices of similar transactions, which is classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.  The carrying value of the Senior Notes was $596,760 at June 30, 2017.  Except as otherwise noted below, NVR believes that insignificant differences exist between the carrying value and the fair value of its financial instruments, which consist of cash equivalents, due to their short term nature.

Derivative Instruments and Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

In the normal course of business, NVR’s wholly-owned mortgage subsidiary, NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. (“NVRM”), enters into contractual commitments to extend credit to NVR’s homebuyers with fixed expiration dates.  The commitments become effective when the borrowers "lock-in" a specified interest rate within time frames established by NVRM.  All mortgagors are evaluated for credit worthiness prior to the extension of the commitment.  Market risk arises if interest rates move adversely between the time of the "lock-in" of rates by the borrower and the sale date of the loan to a broker/dealer.  To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock commitments to borrowers, NVRM enters into optional or mandatory delivery forward sale contracts to sell whole loans and mortgage-backed securities to broker/dealers.  The forward sales contracts lock in an interest rate and price for the sale of loans similar to the specific rate lock commitments.  NVRM does not engage in speculative or trading derivative activities.  Both the rate lock commitments to borrowers and the forward sale contracts to broker/dealers are undesignated derivatives and, accordingly, are marked to fair value through earnings.  At June 30, 2017, there were contractual commitments to extend credit to borrowers aggregating $655,409 and open forward delivery contracts aggregating $777,148, which hedge both the rate lock loan commitments and closed loans held for sale.

The fair value of NVRM’s rate lock commitments to borrowers and the related input levels include, as applicable:

The assumed gain/loss considers the excess servicing to be received or buydown fees to be paid upon securitization of the loan.  The excess servicing and buydown fees are calculated pursuant to contractual terms with investors.  To calculate the effects of interest rate movements, NVRM utilizes applicable published mortgage-backed security prices, and multiplies the price movement between the rate lock date and the balance sheet date by the notional loan commitment amount.  NVRM sells all of its loans on a servicing released basis, and receives a servicing released premium upon sale.  Thus, the value of the servicing rights, which averaged 111 basis points of the loan amount as of June 30, 2017, is included in the fair value measurement and is based upon contractual terms with investors and varies depending on the loan type.  NVRM assumes an approximate 15% fallout rate when measuring the fair value of rate lock commitments.  Fallout is defined as locked loan commitments for which NVRM does not close a mortgage loan and is based on historical experience.

The fair value of NVRM’s forward sales contracts to broker/dealers solely considers the market price movement of the same type of security between the trade date and the balance sheet date (Level 2).  The market price changes are multiplied by the notional amount of the forward sales contracts to measure the fair value.

Mortgage loans held for sale are recorded at fair value when closed, and thereafter are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, net of deferred origination costs, until sold.  Fair value is measured using Level 2 inputs.  The fair value of

12

---

NVR, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars and shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

loans held for sale of $241,398 included on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet has been increased by $1,057 from the aggregate principal balance of $240,341.

The undesignated derivative instruments are included on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet, as of June 30, 2017, as follows:

 

 

The fair value measurement as of June 30, 2017 was as follows:

 

 

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, NVRM recorded a fair value adjustment to income of $3,376 and $1,359, respectively.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, NVRM recorded a fair value adjustment to income of $589 and a fair value adjustment to expense of $67, respectively.  Unrealized gains/losses from the change in the fair value measurements are included in earnings as a component of mortgage banking fees in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.  The fair value measurement will be impacted in the future by the change in the value of the servicing rights, interest rate movements, security price fluctuations, and the volume and product mix of NVRM’s closed loans and locked loan commitments.

 

 

Senior Notes

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had Senior Notes outstanding with a principal balance of $600,000. The Senior Notes mature on September 15, 2022 and bear interest at 3.95%, payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15. The Senior Notes were issued at a discount to yield 3.97% and have been reflected net of the unamortized discount and unamortized debt issuance costs in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Credit Agreement

NVR has an unsecured Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), which provides for aggregate revolving loan commitments of $200,000 (the “Facility”). Under the Credit Agreement, the Company may request increases of up to $300,000 to the Facility in the form of revolving loan commitments or term loans to the extent that new or existing lenders agree to provide additional revolving loan or term loan commitments.  The Credit Agreement provides for a $100,000 sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit, of which approximately $8,600 was outstanding at June 30, 2017, and a $25,000 sublimit for a swing line commitment. The Credit Agreement termination date is July 15, 2021. There was no debt outstanding under the Facility at June 30, 2017.

13

---

NVR, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars and shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

Repurchase Agreement

NVRM provides for its mortgage origination and other operating activities using cash generated from its operations, borrowings from its parent company, NVR, as well as a revolving mortgage repurchase agreement (the “Repurchase Agreement”), which is non-recourse to NVR.  The Repurchase Agreement provides for loan purchases up to $150,000, subject to certain sub-limits, and provides for an incremental commitment pursuant to which NVRM may from time to time request increases in the total commitment available under the Repurchase Agreement by up to $50,000 in the aggregate. Amounts outstanding under the Repurchase Agreement are collateralized by the Company’s mortgage loans held for sale. The Repurchase Agreement was renewed in July 2017 with materially consistent terms and conditions and expires on July 25, 2018. At June 30, 2017, there were no borrowing base limitations reducing the amount available under the Repurchase Agreement. There was no debt outstanding under the Repurchase Agreement at June 30, 2017.

 

 

In June 2010, the Company received a Request for Information from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) pursuant to Section 308 of the Clean Water Act. The request sought information about storm water discharge practices in connection with homebuilding projects completed or underway by the Company in New York and New Jersey. The Company cooperated with this request, and provided information to the EPA. The Company was subsequently informed by the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) that the EPA forwarded the information on the matter to the DOJ. The Company has entered a consent decree with the EPA and DOJ to settle this matter. The consent decree includes injunctive relief and payment of a civil penalty, which was accrued as of June 30, 2017. The consent decree has been submitted for approval in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The Company believes the disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on its results of operations and liquidity or on its financial condition.

The Company and its subsidiaries are also involved in various other litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, and based on advice of legal counsel, this litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. Legal costs incurred in connection with outstanding litigation are expensed as incurred.

 

The Company’s effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 was 29.2% and 26.5%, respectively.  For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company’s effective tax rate was 36.7%.  The 2017 effective tax rate was reduced as a result of the Company’s adoption of ASU 2016-09, which requires the excess tax benefit from stock option exercises to be recorded as a reduction to income tax expense in the period stock options are exercised.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized $16,464 and $36,364, respectively, in excess tax benefits. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, excess tax benefits of $2,394 and $8,678, respectively, were recorded to additional paid-in capital within shareholders’ equity.

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers.  The standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective. The standard is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2018. The Company plans to adopt the standard using the cumulative effect transition method. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires lessees to recognize most leases on-balance sheet with a liability equal to the present value of lease payments over the lease term and a right-of-use asset for the right to use the underlying asset over the lease term. Lessees will recognize expenses on their income statements in

14

---

NVR, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(dollars and shares in thousands)

(unaudited)

 

a manner similar to current GAAP. The standard also requires additional disclosures of key information about leasing arrangements. The standard is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2019. The Company believes that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on both assets and liabilities presented on the balance sheet, and is further evaluating the impact of its adoption.

In June 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), which significantly changes the way impairment of financial assets is recognized. The standard will require immediate recognition of estimated credit losses expected to occur over the remaining life of many financial assets, which will generally result in earlier recognition of allowances for credit losses on loans and other financial instruments. The standard’s provisions will be applied as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings as of the effective date. The standard is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The objective of the standard is to address the diversity in practice of how certain cash receipts and payments are presented on the statement of cash flows. The standard requires that the guidance be applied retrospectively in the first interim and annual periods in which an entity adopts the guidance. The standard is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2018. The Company expects the standard to affect the presentation of the distributions from joint ventures in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

In November 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Restricted Cash. The amendments in the standard require that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. As a result, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total cash amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2018. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of cash flows and related disclosures.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The standard’s objective is to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating the second step from the goodwill impairment test. Under the amendments in the standard, an entity would perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge would then be recognized, not to exceed the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2020, and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In May 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Scope of Modification Accounting.  The amendments in the standard clarify when changes in a share-based payment award must be accounted for as a modification, and will allow entities to make certain changes to share-based payment awards without accounting for them as modifications.  Under the new guidance, entities will only apply modification accounting if there are substantive changes made to share-based payment awards.  If a change made to a share-based payment award does not affect the fair value, vesting conditions and classification as either an equity or liability instrument, modification accounting will not need to be applied.  The standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

 

 

 

 

15

---

 

Item 2.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as statements made by us in periodic press releases or other public communications, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Certain, but not necessarily all, of such forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology.  All statements other than of historical facts are forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements contained in this document may include those regarding market trends, NVR’s financial position, business strategy, the outcome of pending litigation, investigations or similar contingencies, projected plans and objectives of management for future operations.  Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results or performance of NVR to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.  Such risk factors include, but are not limited to the following: general economic and business conditions (on both a national and regional level); interest rate changes; access to suitable financing by NVR and NVR’s customers; increased regulation in the mortgage banking industry; the ability of our mortgage banking subsidiary to sell loans it originates into the secondary market; competition; the availability and cost of land and other raw materials used by NVR in its homebuilding operations; shortages of labor; weather related slow-downs; building moratoriums; governmental regulation; fluctuation and volatility of stock and other financial markets; mortgage financing availability; and other factors over which NVR has little or no control.  NVR undertakes no obligation to update such forward-looking statements except as required by law.  For additional information regarding risk factors, see Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Part I, Item 1A of NVR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “NVR,” “we,” “us,” or “our” include NVR and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

Overview

Business

Our primary business is the construction and sale of single-family detached homes, townhomes and condominiums, all of which are primarily constructed on a pre-sold basis.  To fully serve customers of our homebuilding operations, we also operate a mortgage banking and title services business.  We primarily conduct our operations in mature markets. Additionally, we generally grow our business through market share gains in our existing markets and by expanding into markets contiguous to our current active markets.  Our four homebuilding reportable segments consist of the following regions:

 

Our lot acquisition strategy is predicated upon avoiding the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and development.  We generally do not engage in land development (see discussion below of our land development activities). Instead, we typically acquire finished lots at market prices from various third party land developers pursuant to fixed price finished lot purchase agreements (“Lot Purchase Agreements”).  These Lot Purchase Agreements require deposits, typically ranging up to 10% of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots, in the form of cash or letters of credit that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the Lot Purchase Agreement.  This strategy has allowed us to maximize inventory turnover, which we believe enables us to minimize market risk and to operate with less capital, thereby enhancing rates of return on equity and total capital.

16

---

 

In addition to constructing homes primarily on a pre-sold basis and utilizing what we believe is a conservative lot acquisition strategy, we focus on obtaining and maintaining a leading market position in each market we serve.  This strategy allows us to gain valuable efficiencies and competitive advantages in our markets, which we believe contributes to minimizing the adverse effects of regional economic cycles and provides growth opportunities within these markets.  Our continued success is contingent upon our ability to control an adequate supply of finished lots on which to build.

In certain specific strategic circumstances, we deviate from our historical lot acquisition strategy and engage in joint venture arrangements with land developers or directly acquire raw ground already zoned for its intended use for development.  Once we acquire control of raw ground, we determine whether to sell the raw parcel to a developer and enter into a Lot Purchase Agreement with the developer to purchase the finished lots or to hire a developer to develop the land on our behalf.  While joint venture arrangements and direct land development activity are not our preferred method of acquiring finished building lots, we may enter into additional transactions in the future on a limited basis where there exists a compelling strategic or prudent financial reason to do so.  We expect, however, to continue to acquire substantially all our finished lot inventory using Lot Purchase Agreements with forfeitable deposits.

As of June 30, 2017, we controlled lots as described below.

Lot Purchase Agreements

We controlled approximately 79,100 lots under Lot Purchase Agreements with third parties through deposits in cash and letters of credit totaling approximately $380,900 and $2,400, respectively. Included in the number of controlled lots are approximately 3,900 lots for which we have recorded a contract land deposit impairment reserve of approximately $34,100 as of June 30, 2017.

Joint Venture Limited Liability Corporations (“JVs”)

We had an aggregate investment totaling approximately $44,000 in six JVs, expected to produce approximately 7,350 lots. Of the lots to be produced by the JVs, approximately 4,050 lots were controlled by us and approximately 3,300 were either under contract with unrelated parties or currently not under contract.

Land Under Development

We directly owned four separate raw land parcels, zoned for their intended use, with a current cost basis, including development costs, of approximately $46,700 that we intend to develop into approximately 550 finished lots.  We had additional funding commitments of approximately $10,000 under a joint development agreement related to one parcel, a portion of which we expect will be offset by development credits of approximately $5,400. During January 2017, we purchased one land parcel under development for approximately $14,400. The parcel is expected to produce approximately 90 lots.

See Notes 2, 3 and 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included herein for additional information regarding Lot Purchase Agreements, JVs and land under development, respectively.

Raw Land Purchase Agreements

In addition to the lots we currently control as discussed above, we have certain properties under contract with land owners that are expected to yield approximately 8,400 lots.  Some of these properties may require rezoning or other approvals to achieve the expected yield.  These properties are controlled with deposits in cash and letters of credit totaling approximately $11,600 and $200, respectively, as of June 30, 2017, of which approximately $5,500 is refundable if certain contractual conditions are not met.  We generally expect to assign the raw land contracts to a land developer and simultaneously enter into a Lot Purchase Agreement with the assignee if the project is determined to be feasible.

Current Business Environment and Key Financial Results

During the first six months of 2017 we continued to experience steady new home demand, consistent with that seen during 2016.  However, new home prices continued to be constrained due to the competitive market environment.

Our consolidated revenues for the second quarter of 2017 totaled $1,544,492, an 11% increase from the second quarter of 2016.  Net income for the second quarter ended June 30, 2017 was $147,877, or $35.19 per diluted share, increases of 61% and 60% when compared to net income and diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of 2016, respectively.  Our homebuilding gross profit margin percentage increased to 19.5% in the second quarter of 2017 from 17.3% in the second quarter of 2016. New orders, net of cancellations (“New Orders”) increased 8% in the second quarter

17

---

 

of 2017 compared to the second quarter of 2016. The average sales price for New Orders in the second quarter of 2017 of $377.0 decreased 2% compared to the second quarter of 2016.

Net income and diluted earnings per share were favorably impacted by the reduction in our effective tax rate in the second quarter of 2017 to 29.2% from 36.7% in the second quarter of 2016.  The reduction in the effective tax rate was primarily due to our January 1, 2017 adoption of Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.  See additional discussion regarding the income tax impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 in the “Effective Tax Rate” section below.

We believe that a continuation of the housing market recovery is dependent upon a sustained overall economic recovery, driven by continued improvements in job and wage growth and household formation.  We expect to continue to face gross margin pressure currently impacted by modest pricing power and our ability to manage higher land and construction costs. We also expect to face pressure on mortgage banking profit due to the competitive pricing pressures in the mortgage market. We believe that we are well positioned to take advantage of opportunities that may arise from future economic and homebuilding market volatility due to the strength of our balance sheet.

Homebuilding Operations

The following table summarizes the results of operations and other data for the consolidated homebuilding operations:

 

 

Consolidated Homebuilding - Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

Homebuilding revenues increased 11% for the second quarter of 2017 from the same period in 2016, as a result of a 9% increase in the number of units settled and a 2% increase in the average settlement price quarter over quarter. The increases in the number of units settled and the average settlement price were primarily attributable to a 9% higher backlog unit balance and a 4% higher average sales price of units in backlog, respectively, entering the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.

Gross profit margin percentage in the second quarter of 2017 increased 220 basis points to 19.5% compared to the second quarter of 2016, due to the modest improvement in pricing, moderating construction costs, and the increase in the number of units settled, which allowed us to better leverage certain operating costs.

The number of New Orders increased 8% while the average sales price of New Orders decreased 2% in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the second quarter of 2016.  The number of New Orders increased in each of our market segments due to more favorable market conditions in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.  Additionally, the increase in New Orders was favorably impacted by a 2% increase in the average number of active communities quarter over quarter.  The decrease in the average sales price of New Orders was primarily attributable to a shift in New Orders to lower priced markets.  

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses in the second quarter of 2017 were relatively flat compared to the same period in 2016, but as a percentage of revenue decreased to 6.6% in the second quarter of 2017 from 7.3% in

18

---

 

the second quarter of 2016.  SG&A as a percentage of revenue were favorably impacted by the 11% increase in homebuilding revenues coupled with relatively flat headcount quarter over quarter.

 

Consolidated Homebuilding - Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

Homebuilding revenues increased 11% for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from the same period in 2016, as a result of a 9% increase in the number of units settled and a 3% increase in the average settlement price year over year.  The increases in the number of units settled and the average settlement price were primarily attributable to an 11% higher backlog unit balance and a 3% higher average sales price of units in backlog, respectively, entering 2017 compared to backlog entering 2016.

Gross profit margin percentage in the first six months of 2017 increased 134 basis points to 18.7% compared to 17.4% in 2016, due primarily to the modest improvement in pricing and the increase in the number of units settled, which allowed us to better leverage certain operating costs.  These favorable impacts on gross profit margin and segment profit were partially offset by slightly higher construction costs year over year.

The number of New Orders and the average sales price of New Orders increased 8% and 1%, respectively, in the first six months of 2017 when compared to the first six months of 2016.  New Orders increased in each of our market segments due to more favorable market conditions in the first six months of 2017 compared to the first six months of 2016.  Additionally, the increase in New Orders was favorably impacted by a 2% increase in the average number of active communities year over year.

SG&A expenses in the first six months of 2017 were relatively flat compared to the first six months of 2016, but as a percentage of revenue decreased to 7.2% in the first half of 2017 from 8.0% in the first half of 2016.  SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenue were favorably impacted by the 11% increase in revenues coupled with relatively flat headcount year over year.

Backlog units and dollars were 8,813 units and $3,444,964, respectively, as of June 30, 2017 compared to 8,103 units and $3,122,534, respectively, as of June 30, 2016.  The 9% increase in backlog units was primarily attributable to the aforementioned 8% increase in New Orders. Backlog dollars were favorably impacted by the increase in backlog units.

Backlog, which represents homes sold but not yet settled with the customer, may be impacted by customer cancellations for various reasons that are beyond our control, such as failure to obtain mortgage financing, inability to sell an existing home, job loss, or a variety of other reasons.  In any period, a portion of the cancellations that we experience are related to new sales that occurred during the same period, and a portion are related to sales that occurred in prior periods and therefore appeared in the opening backlog for the current period.  Expressed as the total of all cancellations during the period as a percentage of gross sales during the period, our cancellation rate was approximately 14.2% and 14.0% in the first six months of 2017 and 2016, respectively.  During the most recent four quarters, approximately 6% of a reporting quarter’s opening backlog cancelled during the fiscal quarter. We can provide no assurance that our historical cancellation rates are indicative of the actual cancellation rate that may occur during the remainder of 2017 or future years.

The backlog turnover rate is impacted by various factors, including, but not limited to, changes in New Order activity, internal production capacity, external subcontractor capacity and other external factors over which we do not exercise control.

Reportable Segments

Homebuilding profit before tax includes all revenues and income generated from the sale of homes, less the cost of homes sold, SG&A expenses, and a corporate capital allocation charge determined at the corporate headquarters.  The corporate capital allocation charge eliminates in consolidation and is based on the segment’s average net assets employed.  The corporate capital allocation charged to the operating segment allows the Chief Operating Decision Maker to determine whether the operating segment’s results are providing the desired rate of return after covering our cost of capital.

We record charges on contract land deposits when we determine that it is probable that recovery of the deposit is impaired.  For segment reporting purposes, impairments on contract land deposits are generally charged to the operating segment upon the determination to terminate a Lot Purchase Agreement with the developer or to restructure a Lot

19

---

 

Purchase Agreement resulting in the forfeiture of the deposit.  We evaluate our entire net contract land deposit portfolio for impairment each quarter.  For presentation purposes below, the contract land deposit reserve at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 has been allocated to the respective year’s reportable segments to show contract land deposits on a net basis.  The net contract land deposit balances below also include approximately $2,600 and $2,400 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, of letters of credit issued as deposits in lieu of cash.

The following tables summarize certain homebuilding operating activity by reportable segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Selected Segment Financial Data:

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Activity:

 

20

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

Homebuilding Inventory:

 

 

 

21

---

 

 

 

 

Lots Controlled and Land Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

Mid Atlantic

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

The Mid Atlantic segment had an approximate $36,900, or 58%, increase in segment profit in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the second quarter of 2016.  The increase in segment profit was driven by an increase of approximately $100,000, or 13%, in revenues and improved gross profit margins quarter over quarter. Segment revenues increased primarily due to a 12% increase in the number of units settled.  The increase in the number of units settled was favorably

22

---

 

impacted by an 8% higher backlog unit balance entering the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016, coupled with a higher backlog turnover rate quarter over quarter. The Mid Atlantic segment’s gross profit margin percentage increased to 19.1% in the second quarter of 2017 from 16.6% in the second quarter of 2016, due primarily to the modest improvement in pricing, moderating construction costs, and the increase in the number of units settled, which allowed us to better leverage certain operating costs.

Segment New Orders increased 1% while the average sales price of New Orders decreased 2% in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the second quarter of 2016. The decrease in the average sales price of New Orders was primarily attributable to a shift in New Orders in the current year quarter to lower priced markets, as well as a shift from our NVHomes product, which typically sells at higher price points within the segment.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

The Mid Atlantic segment had an approximate $54,800, or 50%, increase in segment profit in the first six months of 2017 compared to the first six months of 2016.  The increase in segment profit was driven by an increase of segment revenues of approximately $188,700, or 13%, and improved gross profit margins year over year.  Segment revenues increased due primarily to a 13% increase in the number of units settled.  The increase in the number of units settled was favorably impacted by a 13% higher backlog unit balance entering 2017 compared to the backlog entering 2016.  The Mid Atlantic segment’s gross profit margin percentage increased to 18.5% in 2017 from 16.7% in 2016, due primarily to the modest improvement in pricing, moderating construction costs, and the increase in the number of units settled, which allowed us to better leverage certain operating costs.

Segment New Orders and the average sales price of New Order increased 3% and 1%, respectively, in the first six months of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The increase in New Orders was attributable to a 3% increase in the average number of active communities year over year.

North East

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

The North East segment had an approximate $8,500, or 153%, increase in segment profit in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the second quarter of 2016 due to an increase in segment revenues of approximately $18,800, or 17%, and improved gross profit margins, quarter over quarter. The increase in segment revenues was due primarily to a 14% increase in the number of units settled and a 3% increase in the average price of units settled quarter over quarter. The increase in the number of units settled was primarily attributable to a 16% higher backlog unit balance entering the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The increase in the average settlement price was attributable to an 11% higher average sales price of units in backlog entering the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016, partially offset by a shift in units settled to lower priced markets quarter over quarter. The North East segment’s gross profit margin percentage increased to 19.7% in the second quarter of 2017 from 15.7% in the second quarter of 2016. Gross profit margin and segment profit were favorably impacted by the modest improvement in pricing, flat construction costs, and the increase in the number of units settled, which allowed us to better leverage certain operating costs.  These favorable impacts on gross profit margin and segment profit were partially offset by higher lot costs quarter over quarter.

Segment New Orders and the average sales price of New Orders increased 15% and 4%, respectively, in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the second quarter of 2016. The increase in New Orders was attributable to a 5% increase in the average number of active communities quarter over quarter and more favorable market conditions in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016, which led to higher absorption rates. The increase in the average sales price of New Orders quarter over quarter, was attributable to a shift in New Orders to higher priced markets within the segment and a shift to higher priced communities within certain markets.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

The North East segment had an approximate $13,600, or 141%, increase in segment profit in the first six months of 2017 compared to the first six months of 2016 due to an increase in segment revenues of approximately $27,900, or 14%, and improved gross profit margins, year over year. The increase in segment revenues was due to a 5% increase in the number of units settled and an 8% increase in the average settlement price year over year. The increase in the number of units settled was primarily attributable to a 13% higher backlog unit balance entering 2017 compared to the backlog unit

23

---

 

balance entering 2016, partially offset by a lower backlog turnover rate year over year. The increase in the average settlement price was attributable to a 9% higher average sales price of units in backlog entering 2017 compared to the same period in 2016, driven by a shift to higher priced markets within the segment and a shift to higher priced communities within certain markets. The North East segment’s gross profit margin percentage increased to 19.3% in the first six months of 2017 from 16.0% in the first six months of 2016. Gross profit margin and segment profit were favorably impacted by the improvement in pricing and the increase in the number of units settled, which allowed us to better leverage certain operating costs.  These favorable impacts on gross profit margin and segment profit were partially offset by higher construction and lot costs year over year.

Segment New Orders and the average sales price of New Orders each increased 10% in the first six months of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. New Orders were favorably impacted by an 8% increase in the average number of active communities year over year. The increase in the average New Order sales year over year, was attributable to a shift in New Orders to higher priced markets within the segment and a shift to higher priced communities within certain markets.

Mid East

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

The Mid East segment had an approximate $5,900, or 20%, increase in segment profit in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the second quarter of 2016. The increase in segment profit was driven by an increase of approximately $7,000, or 2%, in revenues and improved gross profit margins quarter over quarter. The increase in revenues was due to 1% increases in both the number of units settled and the average price of units settled quarter over quarter. The segment’s gross profit margin percentage increased to 19.1% in the second quarter of 2017 from 17.8% in the second quarter of 2016.  Gross profit margins were favorably impacted by the modest improvements in pricing and construction costs quarter over quarter.

Segment New Orders and the average sales price of New Orders increased 14% and 2%, respectively, in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.  New Orders increased despite an 8% decrease in the average number of active communities quarter over quarter as more favorable market conditions in the second quarter of 2017 led to higher absorption rates within the segment.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

The Mid East segment had an approximate $5,400, or 10%, increase in segment profit in the first six months of 2017 compared to the first six months of 2016.  The increase in segment profit was driven by an increase of approximately $5,700, or 1%, in revenues and improved gross profit margins year over year.  The increase in revenues was due to a 2% increase in the average price of units settled, which was attributable to a 3% higher average sales price of homes in backlog entering 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The segment’s gross profit margin percentage increased to 18.7% in the first six months of 2017 from 18.0% in the same period of 2016, primarily attributable to the modest improvement in pricing, partially offset by higher construction costs year over year.

Segment New Orders and the average sales price of New Orders increased 11% and 2%, respectively, in the first six months of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.  New Orders increased despite a 9% decrease in the average number of active communities year over year as more favorable market conditions in 2017 led to higher absorption rates within the segment.

South East

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

The South East segment had an approximate $7,100, or 45%, increase in segment profit in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the second quarter of 2016. The increase in segment profit was primarily driven by an increase of approximately $25,200, or 14%, in revenues and improved gross profit margins quarter over quarter.  The increase in revenues was due to a 12% increase in the number of units settled and a 3% increase in the average settlement price quarter over quarter. The increases in the number of units settled and the average settlement price were primarily attributable to a 15% higher backlog unit balance and a 3% higher average sales price of units in backlog, respectively, entering the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The South East segment’s gross profit margin

24

---

 

percentage increased to 20.7% in the second quarter of 2017 from 18.4% in the second quarter of 2016, primarily due to the modest improvement in pricing, partially offset by higher construction costs.

Segment New Orders and the average sales price of New Orders increased 19% and 1%, respectively, in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.  New Orders were favorably impacted by a 14% increase in the average number of active communities in the second quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 and more favorable market conditions quarter over quarter.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

The South East segment had an approximate $8,900, or 31%, increase in segment profit in the first six months of 2017 compared to the first six months of 2016.  The increase in segment profit was primarily driven by an increase of approximately $54,800, or 17%, in revenues and improved gross profit margins.  The increase in revenues was attributable to a 15% increase in the number of units settled and a 2% increase in the average settlement price.  The increase in settlements was attributable to a 17% higher backlog unit balance entering 2017 compared to backlog entering 2016. The South East segment’s gross profit margin percentage increased to 19.5% in the first six months of 2017 from 18.6% in the first six months of 2016 primarily due to the modest improvement in pricing, partially offset by higher construction costs year over year.

Segment New Orders and the average sales price of New Orders increased 16% and 1%, respectively, in the first six months of 2017 compared to 2016.  New Orders were favorably impacted by a 13% increase in the average number of active communities in the first six months of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 and more favorable market conditions year over year.

Homebuilding Segment Reconciliations to Consolidated Homebuilding Operations

In addition to the corporate capital allocation and contract land deposit impairments discussed above, the other reconciling items between homebuilding segment profit and homebuilding consolidated profit before tax include unallocated corporate overhead (which includes all management incentive compensation), equity-based compensation expense, consolidation adjustments and external corporate interest expense. Our overhead functions, such as accounting, treasury and human resources, are centrally performed and the costs are not allocated to our operating segments. Consolidation adjustments consist of such items to convert the reportable segments’ results, which are predominantly maintained on a cash basis, to a full accrual basis for external financial statement presentation purposes, and are not allocated to our operating segments. External corporate interest expense primarily consists of interest charges on our 3.95% Senior Notes due 2022, and is not charged to the operating segments because the charges are included in the corporate capital allocation discussed above.

 

25

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

---

 

Mortgage Banking Segment

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

We conduct our mortgage banking activity through NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc. (“NVRM”), a wholly owned subsidiary. NVRM focuses exclusively on serving the homebuilding segment customer base. NVRM sells all of the mortgage loans it closes to investors in the secondary markets on a servicing-released basis, typically within 30 days from the loan closing. The following table summarizes the results of our mortgage banking operations and certain statistical data for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:

 

  

Loan closing volume for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased by approximately $99,200, or 11%, and $188,700, or 11%, respectively, from the same periods in 2016. The increase in loan closing volume was primarily attributable to the 9% increase in the homebuilding segment’s number of units settled during both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 when compared to the same periods in 2016.

Segment profit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased by approximately $4,000, or 29%, and $9,600, or 39%, respectively, from the same periods in 2016. The increases were primarily attributable to an increase in mortgage banking fees, partially offset by an increase in general and administrative expenses. Mortgage banking fees increased by approximately $5,300 and $12,300 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, resulting from the aforementioned increase in loan closing volume and an increase in secondary marketing gains on sales of loans. General and administrative expenses increased by approximately $1,500 and $2,900 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, resulting from an increase in personnel costs.

 

Effective Tax Rate

Our effective tax rate during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 was 29.2% and 26.5%, respectively.  For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, our effective tax rate was 36.7%. The 2017 effective tax rate was reduced as a result of our January 1, 2017 adoption of ASU 2016-09, which requires the excess tax benefit from stock option exercises to be recorded as a reduction to income tax expense in the period stock options are exercised.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, we recognized $16,464, or $3.92 per diluted share, and $36,364, or $8.75 per diluted share, respectively, in excess tax benefits.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, excess tax benefits of $2,394 and $8,678, respectively, were recorded to additional paid-in capital within shareholders’ equity. We expect to experience volatility in our effective tax rate in future quarters as the amount of the excess tax benefit from

27

---

 

equity-based awards is dependent on our stock price when awards are exercised as well as on the timing of exercises, which historically has varied from quarter to quarter.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Lines of Credit and Notes Payable

Our homebuilding business segment funds its operations from cash flows provided by operating activities, a short-term unsecured working capital revolving credit facility and capital raised in the public debt and equity markets. The unsecured Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) provides for aggregate revolving loan commitments of $200,000. Under the Credit Agreement, we may request increases of up to $300,000 to the facility in the form of revolving loan commitments or term loans to the extent that new or existing lenders agree to provide additional revolving loan or term loan commitments.  The Credit Agreement provides for a $100,000 sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit of which there was approximately $8,600 outstanding at June 30, 2017, and a $25,000 sublimit for a swing line commitment. The Credit Agreement termination date is July 15, 2021. There was no debt outstanding under the Credit Agreement at June 30, 2017.

Our mortgage banking subsidiary, NVRM, provides for its mortgage origination and other operating activities using cash generated from its operations, borrowings from its parent company, NVR, as well as a $150,000 revolving mortgage repurchase facility (the “Repurchase Agreement”), which is non-recourse to NVR.  The Repurchase Agreement provides for an incremental commitment pursuant to which we may request increases in the total commitment available under the Repurchase Agreement by up to $50,000 in the aggregate.  The Repurchase Agreement was renewed in July 2017 with materially consistent terms and conditions and expires on July 25, 2018.  At June 30, 2017, there were no borrowing base limitations reducing the amount available under the Repurchase Agreement.  There was no debt outstanding under the Repurchase Agreement at June 30, 2017.

There have been no material changes in our lines of credit and notes payable during the six months ended June 30, 2017.  For additional information regarding lines of credit and notes payable, see Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Cash Flows

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, cash and cash equivalents increased by $132,694.  Cash provided by operating activities was $179,731.  Cash was provided by earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and net proceeds of $163,686 from mortgage loan activity.  Cash was primarily used to fund the increase in homebuilding inventory of $272,851 which was primarily attributable to an increase in the number of units under construction at June 30, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016.

Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 of $5,497 included cash used for purchases of property, plant and equipment of $9,784, partially offset by the receipt of capital distributions from our unconsolidated JVs totaling $4,270.

Net cash used in financing activities was $41,540 for the six months ended June 30, 2017.  Cash was used to repurchase 83,762 shares of our common stock at an aggregate purchase price of $159,506 under our ongoing common stock repurchase program, discussed below. Cash was provided from stock option exercise proceeds totaling $117,966.

Equity Repurchases

In addition to funding growth in our homebuilding and mortgage banking operations, we historically have used a substantial portion of our excess liquidity to repurchase outstanding shares of our common stock in open market and privately negotiated transactions.  This ongoing repurchase activity is conducted pursuant to publicly announced Board authorizations, and is typically executed in accordance with the safe-harbor provisions of Rule 10b-18 promulgated under the Exchange Act.  In addition, the Board resolutions authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock specifically prohibit us from purchasing shares from our officers, directors, Profit Sharing/401(k) Plan Trust or Employee Stock Ownership Plan Trust.  The repurchase program assists us in accomplishing our primary objective of creating increases in shareholder value.  See Part II, Item 2, Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further discussion of repurchase activity during the second quarter of 2017.

28

---

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 14 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements applicable to us.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies as previously disclosed in Part II, Item 7, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

There have been no material changes in our market risks during the six months ended June 30, 2017. For additional information regarding our market risks, see Part II, Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Item 4.Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15.  Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.  There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting in the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.Legal Proceedings

In June 2010, we received a Request for Information from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) pursuant to Section 308 of the Clean Water Act. The request sought information about storm water discharge practices in connection with homebuilding projects completed or underway by us in New York and New Jersey. We cooperated with this request, and provided information to the EPA. We were subsequently informed by the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) that the EPA forwarded the information on the matter to the DOJ.  We have entered a consent decree with the EPA and DOJ to settle this matter.  The consent decree includes injunctive relief and payment of a civil penalty, which was accrued as of June 30, 2017.  The consent decree has been submitted for approval in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. We believe the disposition of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and liquidity or on our financial condition.

We are also involved in various other litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, and based on advice of legal counsel, this litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Legal costs incurred in connection with outstanding litigation are expensed as incurred.

Item 1A.Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

29

---

 

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

            (dollars in thousands, except per share data)

We had two share repurchase authorizations outstanding during the quarter ended June 30, 2017. On November 2, 2016, and February 15, 2017, we publicly announced that our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of our outstanding common stock in one or more open market and/or privately negotiated transactions, up to an aggregate of $300,000 per authorization.  The repurchase authorizations do not have expiration dates.  We repurchased the following shares of our common stock during the second quarter of 2017:

 

30

---

 

 

31

---

 

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

32

---

 

Exhibit Index

 

 

33