UNITED STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER
REPORT
OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-05379
Name of Registrant: Royce Focus Trust, Inc.
Address of Registrant: 745
Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10151
Name and address of agent for service: | John E. Denneen, Esq. | |
745 Fifth Avenue | ||
New York, NY 10151 |
Registrants telephone
number, including area code: (212) 508-4500
Date of fiscal year end: December
31, 2013
Date of reporting period: January 1, 2014 June 30, 2014
Item 1. Reports to Shareholders.
SEMIANNUAL
REVIEW AND REPORT
TO STOCKHOLDERS
Royce Value Trust Royce Micro-Cap Trust Royce Focus Trust Royce Global Value Trust |
||
www.roycefunds.com |
A Few Words on Closed-End Funds | |
Royce & Associates, LLC manages four closed-end funds: Royce Value Trust, a small-cap value closed-end fund
offering; Royce Micro-Cap Trust, a micro-cap closed-end fund; Royce Focus Trust, a closed-end fund that invests
in a limited number of primarily small-cap companies; and Royce Global Value Trust, a global closed-end offering
that invests in a broadly diversified portfolio of both U.S. and non-U.S. small-cap stocks. |
A closed-end fund is an investment company whose shares are listed and traded on a stock exchange. Like all investment
companies, including open-end mutual funds, the assets of a closed-end fund are professionally managed in accordance with
the investment objectives and policies approved by the Funds Board of Directors. A closed-end fund raises cash for investment
by issuing a fixed number of shares through initial and other public offerings that may include shelf offerings and periodic
rights offerings. Proceeds from the offerings are invested in an actively managed portfolio of securities. Investors wanting to buy
or sell shares of a publicly traded closed-end fund after the offerings must do so on a stock exchange, as with any publicly traded
stock. Shares of closed-end funds frequently trade at a discount to their net asset value. This is in contrast to open-end mutual
funds, in which the fund sells and redeems its shares on a continuous basis. |
A Closed-End Fund Offers Several Distinct Advantages Not Available from an Open-End Fund Structure |
Since a closed-end fund does not issue redeemable securities
or offer its securities on a continuous basis, it does not need to
liquidate securities or hold uninvested assets to meet investor
demands for cash redemptions, as an open-end fund must. |
|
In a closed-end fund, not having to meet investor
redemption requests or invest at inopportune times is ideal
for value managers who attempt to buy stocks when prices
are depressed and sell securities when prices are high. |
|
A closed-end fund may invest more freely in less liquid
portfolio securities because it is not subject to potential
stockholder redemption demands. This is particularly
beneficial for Royce-managed closed-end funds, which
invest in small- and micro-cap securities. |
|
The fixed capital structure allows permanent leverage to be
employed as a means to enhance capital appreciation potential. |
|
Unlike Royces open-end funds, our closed-end funds are
able to distribute capital gains on a quarterly basis. Each of
the Funds other than Royce Global Value Trust has adopted
a quarterly distribution policy for its common stock. Please
see pages 18-20 for more details. |
|
We believe that the closed-end fund structure is very suitable
for the long-term investor who understands the benefits of a
stable pool of capital. |
|
Why Dividend Reinvestment is Important |
A very important component of an investors total return comes from the reinvestment of distributions. By reinvesting
distributions, our investors can maintain an undiluted investment in a Fund. To get a fair idea of the impact of reinvested
distributions, please see the charts on pages 11, 13, and 15. For additional information on the Funds Distribution Reinvestment
and Cash Purchase Options and the benefits for stockholders, please see page 20 or visit our website at www.roycefunds.com. |
The Board of Directors for each of Royce Value Trust, Royce Micro-Cap Trust and Royce Focus Trust has authorized a managed
distribution policy (MDP) paying quarterly distributions at an annual rate of 7% (for Royce Value and Micro-Cap Trust)
and 5% (for Royce Focus Trust) of the average of the prior four quarter-end net asset values. With each distribution, these
Funds will issue a notice to stockholders and an accompanying press release which will provide detailed information regarding
the amount and composition of the distribution and other information required by a Funds MDP. You should not draw any
conclusions about a Funds investment performance from the amount of distributions or from the terms of a Funds MDP. A
Funds Board of Directors may amend or terminate the MDP at any time without prior notice to stockholders; however, at this
time, there are no reasonably foreseeable circumstances that might cause the termination of any of the MDPs. |
This page is not part of the 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Table of Contents | |
Semiannual Review | |
Performance Table | 2 |
Letter to Our Stockholders | 3 |
Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 9 |
For more than 40 years, we have used a value-oriented approach to invest in small-cap securities. We focus primarily on the
quality of a companys balance sheet, its ability to generate free cash flow, and other measures of profitability or sound financial
condition. We then use these factors to assess the companys current worth, basing the assessment on either what we believe
a knowledgeable buyer might pay to acquire the entire company or what we think the value of the company should be in the
stock market. |
|
This page is not part of the 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 1 |
Performance Table | |
NAV Average Annual Total Returns | Through June 30, 2014 |
Royce | Royce | Royce | Royce Global | Russell | Russell | Russell | Russell Global | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value Trust | Micro-Cap Trust | Focus Trust | Value Trust | 2000 Index | Microcap Index | 2500 Index | Small Cap Index | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year-to-Date1 | 3.00 | % | 3.06 | % | 12.74 | % | 5.57 | % | 3.19 | % | 1.56 | % | 5.95 | % | 5.72 | % | ||||||||||||||||
One-Year | 22.90 | 31.32 | 31.56 | n.a. | 23.64 | 24.98 | 25.58 | 23.60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three-Year | 10.81 | 16.09 | 9.08 | n.a. | 14.57 | 15.94 | 15.51 | 9.22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Five-Year | 19.30 | 20.67 | 16.50 | n.a. | 20.21 | 20.03 | 21.63 | 15.93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
10-Year | 8.28 | 9.09 | 9.59 | n.a. | 8.70 | 6.67 | 9.78 | 9.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15-Year | 9.91 | 11.65 | 11.18 | n.a. | 8.01 | n.a. | 9.34 | 8.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
20-Year | 11.09 | 12.04 | n.a. | n.a. | 9.81 | n.a. | 11.42 | n.a. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
25-Year | 11.04 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 9.74 | n.a. | 11.22 | n.a. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Since Inception | 11.03 | 11.78 | 11.02 | 8.49 | 2 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Inception Date | 11/26/86 | 12/14/93 | 11/1/963 | 10/17/13 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | Not annualized, cumulative Year-to-Date. |
2 | Not annualized, cumulative since inception on 10/17/13. |
3 | Date Royce & Associates, LLC assumed investment management responsibility for the Fund. |
All performance information in this Review and Report reflects past performance, is presented on a total return basis, and reflects the reinvestment of
distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate, so that shares may be
worth more or less than their original cost when sold. Current performance may be higher or lower than performance quoted. Current month-end performance
may be obtained at www.roycefunds.com. The Funds are closed-end registered investment companies whose respective shares of common stock may trade at a
discount to the net asset value. Shares of each Funds common stock are also subject to the market risk of investing in the underlying portfolio securities held by each
Fund. Certain immaterial adjustments were made to the net assets of Royce Global Value Trust at 6/30/14 for financial reporting purposes, and as a result the net
asset value originally calculated on that date and the total return based on that net asset value differs from the adjusted net asset value and total return reported in the
Financial Highlights. The Funds are closed-end registered investment companies whose shares of common stock trade at a discount to their net asset value. Shares of
each Funds common stock are also subject to the market risks of investing in the underlying portfolio securities held by each Fund, respectively. All indexes referenced
are unmanaged and capitalization-weighted. Each indexs returns include net reinvested dividends and/or interest income. Russell Investment Group is the source and
owner of the trademarks, service marks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Russell® is a trademark of Russell Investment Group. The Russell 2000 Index
is an index of domestic small-cap stocks that measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest publicly traded U.S. companies in the Russell 3000 Index. The Russell
Microcap Index includes 1,000 of the smallest securities in the small-cap Russell 2000 Index, along with the next smallest eligible securities as determined by Russell.
The Russell 2500 Index is an index of the 2,500 smallest publicly traded U.S. companies in the Russell 3000 Index. The Russell Global Small Cap Index is an
unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of global small-cap stocks. The performance of an index does not represent exactly any particular investment, as you
cannot invest directly in an index. Index returns include net reinvested dividends and/or interest income. Royce Value, Micro-Cap and Global Value Trust shares of
common stock trade on the NYSE. Royce Focus Trust shares of common stock trade on the NASDAQ. Royce Fund Services, Inc (RFS) is a member of FINRA
and has filed this Review and Report with FINRA on behalf of each Fund. RFS is not an underwriter or distributor of any of the Funds. |
2 | This page is not part of the 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Letter to Our Stockholders | ||
No Drama |
||
Whatever other opinions we may all hold about the stock markets behavior over the
last six years, we think everyone can agree that it has certainly been dramatic. The action
began in earnest in the fall of 2008, although it is important to recall that small-cap stock
prices had actually been falling for more than a year prior to thatthe peak for the Russell
2000 Index having been established on July 13, 2007. Yet the full effects of the bear were
unleashed by the events of the Financial Crisis, which keyed the dangerously precipitous
nosedive of share prices in the fall of 2008. The tumult lasted until small-caps finally hit
a bottom on March 9, 2009. The fear and anxiety the descent created, however, reached
into the next several years. The feeling of extraordinary fragility that characterized the
early days of the recovery in the spring of 2009 did not magically evaporate when markets
began to find their feet again. In fact, one could argue that these emotions dominated the
behavior of investors at least until the end of 2012.
The three years from 2010 through 2012 were eventful, even if the stress and excitement they generated did not equal that of the first six months of 2009. In fact, much of the markets most extreme moves in that entire four-year span (2009-2012) took place in the first six months of those years, driven in large part by events both actual and potential. The recession in the U.S., debt issues in Europe, and slow growth in China were all very real, while a double-dip recession here at home, default in Europe, and implosion in China fortunately failed to materialize. By the end of 2012, with the stock market climbing and the economy expanding, investors seemed to recognize that, in spite of high volatility and political uncertainty, equity returns had been solidly positive since the March 2009 bottom. This improved confidence helped to spur a different kind |
This page is not part of the 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 3 |
Charles M. Royce, President The long-running, and probably unresolvable, debate about active versus passive investment strategies has taken on new life in the years since the onset of the Financial Crisis, often to the detriment of active approaches. To take one example, Morningstar compiled data showing that inflows into equity mutual funds have been dwarfed by those into equity ETFs (exchange traded funds) measuring from the momentous year of 2008. For the six calendar years from 2008-2013, traditional equity funds have taken in $5.52 billion while ETFs have attracted $389.08 billion. Thats quite a disparity. It seems to be no secret that many active managers have struggled to keep pace with their respective equity indexes in these often eventful years. These years have also seen a raft of studies purporting to show that most investment managers are unable to consistently beat the market, i.e., regularly outperform a relevant index such as the Russell 2000 or S&P 500 Indexes. Perhaps unsurprisingly, we would offer two caveats before one embraces uncritically the notion that passive Continued on page 6... |
Letter to Our Stockholders of dramatic arc. The long, slow recovery entered a new phase in 2013a heady, and
virtually correction-free, bull run in which returns for each of the major domestic stock
indexes topped 30%. The curtain opened on 2014, then, on the heels of one of the better calendar-year performances in the history of domestic equities, which followed four consecutive years of mostly rising stock prices in an uncertain economy. So the question now is, what is the next act for equities? Some argue that the economy is not strong enough to really take flight. They worry about the rich valuations sported by large numbers of stocks. Others see the relative absence of volatility as a sign of complacency and fret that stocks are about to enter a destructive bear phase. There are those who point to increasingly unsettled international situations, such as in Ukraine, Syria, and Iraq, and argue that the market cannot continue to pretend that events in these nations take place far offstage, not in an increasingly intertwined global economy. We, however, are in accord with the more widespread consensus that sees the U.S. economy as gradually normalizing. As evidence we would point to the following: The deficit continues to fall, the Fed continues to wind down the rate of its monthly bond purchases, and interest rates, though they remain close to zero, look likely to rise again in the near future, as they did last year between May and December. Inflation is tame, commodity prices stable. Volatility, as measured by the VIX, finished the first half of 2014 at low levels not seen since 2007. Add an increasingly robust M&A market, and it seems to us that the recipe for ongoing growthand bullishness, however mild, at least compared to last yearseems almost complete. And this process of normalization looks likely to accelerate as the Feds role recedes further and further into the background, setting the stage for a more dynamic pace of growth. So while there remain voices who insist that stocks are overvalued, we think the case for additional gains, which could include a correction along the way, remains persuasive. It seems to us that the relatively lower returns of the first half of 2014 indicate not an end to a bull phase, but a chance for the market to catch its breath and assess its surroundings. It may be that investors need a break from all the drama, a respite from the unrelenting pace of the last six years. So the desire to stand back for a moment and evaluate what is happening seems eminently reasonable. How many investors have enjoyed more than a few moments of true calm since before the recession began back in 2007? Ultimately, we suspect that both the expanding economy and slower pace of returns will result in more fundamentally focused investors. Indeed, the indications that the strength of companies and the businesses they manage are beginning to matter more than indexes and the macro events that move them go back to the spring of 2012, when quality stocksthose with high returns on invested capitalenjoyed a brief run of outperformance. This nascent phenomenon re-startedagain, brieflyin May 2013 when the 10-year Treasury rate reached a bottom. Quality companies, particularly those in our chosen small-cap space, have not yet emerged as leaders, but they have inched closer over the last two years. Correlation levels throughout the market are falling. These are excellent conditions, in our view, for disciplined active management approaches, especially those with a long-term investment horizon. |
||
4 | This page is not part of the 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
No Direction Home |
||||
U.S. stocks turned in a respectable performance in the first half of 2014. If results were not as lofty as they were in the first half of 2013 (and they were not), they were achieved in a more tranquil domestic environment than in the first halves of 2010, 2011, or 2012. One consequence of the more relaxed atmosphere of the first half was that stocks did not seem to know quite what to do with themselves. While the overvalued/not-quite-overvalued-yet argument goes on, the market has not established a clear direction so far in 2014. The bull has so far remained in place during the current cycle; he simply slowed his run to a brisk walk in the first half. For the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2014, the major domestic indexes remained in the black. The small-cap Russell 2000 Index gained 3.2%, taking a back seat to the more tech-oriented Nasdaq Composite, which advanced 5.5% in the first half, and the large-cap S&P 500 and Russell 1000 Indexes, which scored respective gains of 7.1% and 7.3% for the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2014. |
Quality companies, particularly those in our chosen small-cap space, have not yet emerged as leaders, but they have inched closer over the last two years. Correlation levels through-out the market are falling. These are excellent conditions, in our view, for disciplined active management approaches, especially those with a long-term investment horizon. |
|||
The year began on a more moderate note following a red-hot second half
of 2013. Nevertheless, 2014s opening quarter was the seventh consecutive
quarter of positive performance for the Russell 2000, which rose 1.1%.
Large-caps led for the quarterthe S&P 500 and Russell 1000 gained 1.8%
and 2.0%, respectively, while the Nasdaq Composite rose 0.5%. Small-caps reached a first-half high on March 4, and the only correction so far this year was the
9.1% drop for the Russell 2000 from that date through May 15, 2014. April was thus the
cruelest month, but a series of mini-rallies from mid-May through the end of June made
the second quarter mostly positive. The Russell 2000 posted its eighth consecutive positive
quarter, up 2.0%. Once again, large-cap outperformed, with the S&P 500 advancing
5.2% and the Russell 1000 up 5.1% for the second quarter. The Nasdaq bounced back
strong as well, climbing 5.0% in the second quarter and leaving only the small-cap index
out of the five-percent club. |
||||
Small-cap held onto leadership outside the U.S. In the first quarter, the Russell
Global ex-U.S. Small Cap Index was up 3.2% while the Russell Global ex-U.S.
Large Cap Index rose 0.8%. Results were stronger in the second quarter and, as in
the first, closer to their domestic counterparts than we have seen in a while. For the
second quarter, the Russell Global ex-U.S. Small Cap was up 4.2% versus 5.0% for the
Russell Global ex-U.S. Large Cap. Year-to-date, non-U.S. small-caps had the edge, with
the Russell Global ex-U.S. Small Cap returning 7.5% versus a gain of 5.8%
for the Russell Global ex-U.S. Large Cap. After a challenging first quarter,
many Asian equities bounced back in the second and finished closer to the
European indexes, most of which had been on a tear prior to cooling off in
the second quarter. Moving back to the U.S., mid-cap and micro-caps were equally solid in the first quarter. The Russell Midcap Index was up 3.5% versus a gain of 3.0% for the Russell Microcap Index in 2014s first three months. This pattern broke down around the time of the March 4 small-cap high and can be seen in the second-quarter results for each index. The Russell Midcap continued its notable 2014 |
U.S. stocks turned in a respectable performance in the first half of 2014. If results were not as lofty as they were in the first half of 2013 (and they were not), they were achieved in a more tranquil domestic environment than in the first halves of 2010, 2011, or 2012. |
This page is not part of the 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 5 |
investing is always better: First, a
number of managers have consistently outperformed the market over long-term periods and especially within the small-cap asset category. In fact, we believe strongly in the idea that it is not necessary for all managers to beat the market in order for active management to be validated as an approach. Our second note of caution relates to time periods. While it would be nice to outperform an index every year, it is just as unrealistic to expect that as it would be to expect an index to outperform active management every year. It is also unrealistic to expect a high degree of outperformance in the long term without experiencing some short-term underperformance periods. A willingness to stick to ones approach, regardless of market movements and trends, is critical to long-term outperformance in our opinion. This is especially important during market extremes because there are active managers who exhibit style drift or other changes in their discipline when their investment style falls out of favor or is stressed, such as during the tech bubble. Successful active management also entails a willingness to think independently in terms of sector and industry weightings. It is not unusual for the most successful managers to be significantly out of sync relative to a Continued on page 8... |
|||
Letter to Our Stockholders | ||
2014 YEAR-TO-DATE NAV AND MARKET PRICE TOTAL RETURNS FOR ROYCES CLOSED-END FUNDS VS. RUSSELL 2000, RUSSELL MICROCAP, RUSSELL 2500 AND THE RUSSELL GLOBAL SMALL-CAP INDEXES as of 6/30/14 | ||
1 |
Certain immaterial adjustments were made to the net assets of Royce Global Value Trust at 6/30/2014 for financial reporting purposes, and as a
result the net asset value originally calculated on that date and the total returns based on that net asset value differs from that adjusted net asset
value and total return reported in the Financial Highlights. |
|
performance, rising 5.0% in the second quarter. This gave mid-caps an impressive 8.7%
advance on a year-to-date basis. In contrast, micro-caps struggled in the second quarter,
suffering more in the brief downturn than their larger cousins. The Russell Microcap
Index fell 1.4% for the quarter and was up only 1.6% for the year-to-date period ended
June 30, 2014. Many mid-cap stocks have demonstrated strong records of growth over the last few years, and their success throughout the entire post-Financial Crisis cycle has not been a surprise to us. In fact, mid-caps have been an area of significant interest to us for years now. The small- and micro-cap spaces have, by contrast, high numbers of very speculative companies and are typically more volatilesometimes much more so in the case of micro-caps. They have also enjoyed very strong results over the last several years. The three- and five-year annualized returns through the end of June for the Russell 2000 and Russell Microcap Indexes were terrific on an absolute basis. With equity investors acting more cautiously, if not always consistently, so far in 2014, the relative breather for small- and micro-cap stocksand we do not think its any more than a breatherwas also not a surprise. |
||
No Excuses Each of our four closed-end funds enjoyed strong absolute performance in the first half. We were pleased with both the year-to-date and one-year results for the three portfolios with sufficient history, though we recognize fully that more needs to be done with regard to relative performance, especially over more intermediate-term periods. Two portfolios outpaced their respective benchmarks on both an NAV (net asset value) and market price basis for the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2014Royce Micro-Cap Trust and Focus Trust. These same two funds also beat their respective benchmarks for the one-year period ended June 30, 2014. This was welcome news because, with a few exceptions, shorter-term performance advantages have been elusive over the last few years. Of course short-term outperformance must always be kept in perspective as exactly thatshort term. We are hopeful, however, having seen Royce Value Trust and Focus Trust narrow the gap in their respective one-, three-, and five-year results versus their respective benchmarks over |
6 | This page is not part of the 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
the last three to four quarters. In addition, Royce Micro-Cap Trust held an edge over its
benchmark in those periods. Finally, our three closed-end funds with more than 15 years
of history have also generally held their relative edge for periods of a decade or longer.
Yet we still have work to do. As encouraged as we have been about the recent short spates of leadership for quality stocks and the likelihood that a strengthening, less Fed-dependent economy will benefit active small-cap approaches, lower quality small-caps again assumed leadership when prices were rallying in June. Investors are still working out their preferences. Profitable companiesas well those with high returns on invested capitalled through the downturn before falling behind in the up phase. The market thus remained a peculiar place in the first half. This may be because we still have a very active Fed at work in an economy that arguably has not needed the extra help in at least a year. No Worries We are very bullish about the prospects for active small-cap management. We have an obvious bias in favor of active approaches here at Royce, but we think that over the last 14 monthsdating back to the low for the 10-year Treasury in May of last yearwe have reached a point at which active management in small-cap stocks simply makes more sense, especially for long-term investors. Since that May 2013 low, company fundamentals have gradually become more important as drivers of share-price success. Rather than invest in a small-cap index vehicle in which approximately 25% of the companies are losing money (as was the case for the Russell 2000 for the 12 months ended May 31, 2014), we think it is smarter for investors to consider portfolios that look for well-run, financially strong companies with attractive long-term prospects. So while quality has not yet seized small-cap leadership, we suspect that the reign of low-quality stocks is coming to an end. In our view, the next phase will be one in which companies with attractive characteristics such as strong balance sheets and high returns on invested capital should begin to lead. In spite of not showing as much strength when the market was recovering in May and June, many did well enough to lead the small-cap pack from the 2014 high in March through the end of the first half. We would expect something like this pattern to continue at least through the end of the year as the market continues to adjust to the growing normalization of the economy. With diverse small-cap sectors such as Consumer Discretionary, Health Care, and Information Technology showing sizable declines since the end of February, we have been looking closely there (and elsewhere) for what we think are attractively priced, fundamentally strong small-cap businesses. As always, volatility in the small-cap market is something that we seek to use to our advantage, even when it is in short supply. Know This We feel somewhat fortunate in that we do not need to choose a side in the overvalued versus ongoing bull market debate. Rather than trying to make a correct market call, our attention has been focused on those potential opportunities that can materialize even in a widespread bull market. Corrections can arrive at any time, of course, and it has been a while since we have seen one of any significance. The last downturn of more |
We are very bullish about the prospects for active small-cap management... we have reached a point at which active management in small-cap stocks simply makes more sense, especially for long-term investors. |
This page is not part of the 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 7 |
benchmark index with respect to industry and sector weightings (commonly referred to as tracking error). In addition, active managers are not required to invest cash inflows at the time of receipt when market conditions or prices may not be conducive. They may screen for quality and use buy/sell triggers as a means of reducing risk. While a passive manager must own everything, an active manager has the freedom to look for attractive stocks across a targeted universe. All of this helps to explain why we remain so fond of small-caps and so confident in the effectiveness and value of active approaches in the asset class. Active small-cap managers can capture valuation opportunities beyond their respective indexesan opportunity that would be lost if one were limited to owning only the constituents that make up an index. For example, the Russell 2000, while quite broad, only includes about 2,000 of the more than 4,100 companies1 that make up the domestic small-cap universe (those with market caps up to $2.5 billion). While self-serving, we nevertheless think that the small-cap asset class is ideally suited for active management given its enormous size, lack of institutional focus, and limited research availability. |
Letter to Our Stockholders than 10% for the Russell 2000 occurred in the fall of 2012. And share prices recovered so
quickly from the 9.1% March-May decline this year that the down phase barely registered.
This might lead one to argue that the market is being set up for at least a decent-sized
pullback. Our sense, however, is that we are more likely to see smaller ones in the 5-10%
range as part of the ongoing bull phase. Against the backdrop of an economy that looks
poised for faster growth, a Fed tapering at a healthy clip, and an interest-rate environment
in which a steady rate of increase is much more of a when than an if, less severe
downturns look more likely.
Small-cap valuations on the whole are above average, though not unreasonably so given near-zero interest rates and low inflation. A number of anomalies remain in the market, and in many cases we see a wide disparity between what look to us like expensive stocks and those that look inexpensive on an absolute basis. The market seems to be in the process of sorting that outcertainly those areas of the market that do not interest us, and that did well in 2012 and 2013, have been more volatile so far in 2014. In addition, we are still seeing companies that look attractively valued to us based on their fundamentals. All in all, it is looking more and more like a stock-pickers market to us. We could see the second half of the year being pretty similar to the first in terms of the overall returns for stocks. More important, we think there are still enough opportunities out there to keep returns in positive territory through the end of 2014. This could make the markets next act a very happy one for active small-cap managers. Sincerely, |
|||||||||
1 Source: Reuters as of 6/30/14 | Charles M. Royce President |
Christopher D. Clark Co-Chief Investment Officer, Royce & Associates |
Francis D. Gannon Co-Chief Investment Officer Royce & Associates |
|||||||
July 31, 2014 |
8 | This page is not part of the 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Table of Contents | ||
Semiannual Report to Stockholders | ||
Managers Discussions of Fund Performance | ||
Royce Value Trust | 10 | |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | 12 | |
Royce Focus Trust | 14 | |
Royce Global Value Trust | 16 | |
History Since Inception | 18 | |
Distribution Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Options | 20 | |
Schedules of Investments and Other Financial Statements | ||
Royce Value Trust | 21 | |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | 37 | |
Royce Focus Trust | 51 | |
Royce Global Value Trust | 60 | |
Directors and Officers | 69 | |
Board Approval of Investment Advisory Agreements | 70 | |
Notes to Performance and Other Important Information | Inside Back Cover | |
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 9 |
Royce Value Trust |
AVERAGE ANNUAL NAV TOTAL RETURNS Through 6/30/14 |
|||||||||||
JanuaryJune 20141 | 3.00 | % | |||||||||
One-Year | 22.90 | ||||||||||
Three-Year | 10.81 | ||||||||||
Five-Year | 19.30 | ||||||||||
10-Year | 8.28 | ||||||||||
15-Year | 9.91 | ||||||||||
20-Year | 11.09 | ||||||||||
25-Year | 11.04 | ||||||||||
Since Inception (11/26/86) | 11.03 | ||||||||||
1 Not Annualized | |||||||||||
CALENDAR YEAR NAV TOTAL RETURNS | |||||||||||
Year | RVT | Year | RVT | ||||||||
2013 | 34.1 | % | 2005 | 8.4 | % | ||||||
2012 | 15.4 | 2004 | 21.4 | ||||||||
2011 | -10.1 | 2003 | 40.8 | ||||||||
2010 | 30.3 | 2002 | -15.6 | ||||||||
2009 | 44.6 | 2001 | 15.2 | ||||||||
2008 | -45.6 | 2000 | 16.6 | ||||||||
2007 | 5.0 | 1999 | 11.7 | ||||||||
2006 | 19.5 | 1998 | 3.3 | ||||||||
TOP 10 POSITIONS % of Net Assets | |||||||||||
HEICO Corporation | 1.3 | % | |||||||||
On Assignment | 0.9 | ||||||||||
Ash Grove Cement Cl. B | 0.9 | ||||||||||
Federated Investors Cl. B | 0.9 | ||||||||||
Reliance Steel & Aluminum | 0.9 | ||||||||||
Tejon Ranch | 0.8 | ||||||||||
E-L Financial | 0.8 | ||||||||||
Woodward | 0.8 | ||||||||||
Coherent | 0.8 | ||||||||||
Forward Air | 0.8 | ||||||||||
PORTFOLIO SECTOR BREAKDOWN % of Net Assets | |||||||||||
Industrials | 29.3 | % | |||||||||
Information Technology | 18.9 | ||||||||||
Financials | 13.7 | ||||||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 11.2 | ||||||||||
Materials | 7.5 | ||||||||||
Health Care | 5.3 | ||||||||||
Energy | 4.6 | ||||||||||
Consumer Staples | 1.6 | ||||||||||
Telecommunication Services | 0.7 | ||||||||||
Utilities | 0.1 | ||||||||||
Diversified Investment Companies | 0.0 | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous | 4.8 | ||||||||||
Preferred Stock | 0.1 | ||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Net of Outstanding Line of Credit |
2.2 | ||||||||||
Managers Discussion
Royce Value Trust (RVT) put up a solid absolute and relative showing in the first half of 2014. The Fund gained 3.0% on an NAV (net asset value) basis and 3.9% on a market price basis for the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2014 versus the 3.2% gain for each of its unleveraged small-cap benchmarks, the Russell 2000 Index and the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, for the same period. While the bull market ran into 2014 after a magnificent run in 2013, the pace of returns was more subdued. This was also the case for RVT. Harsh winter weather, geopolitical concerns, and a new Federal Reserve chair all gave investors much to ponder. The Fund was up 0.5% on an NAV basis and 0.2% on a market price basis in the first quarter. Volatility returned to the market in March and April, with RVT outperforming the Russell 2000 in the down phase from the Russell 2000s 2014 high on March 4 through May 15. Small-cap stocks then made a strong comeback through the end of June to finish the second quarter in the black. For the second quarter, RVT outperformed its benchmark on both an NAV and market price basis, advancing 2.5% and 3.7%, respectively, versus a gain of 2.0% for the Russell 2000 and 2.1% for the S&P SmallCap 600. We were reasonably pleased with the Funds relative performance during a period where the economy is beginning to slowly but surely normalize. On an NAV basis, RVT outperformed the Russell 2000 for the 15-, 20-, 25-year, and since inception (11/26/86) periods ended June 30, 2014 while the Fund outpaced the Russell 2000 on a market price basis for each of those periods and the five-year span. The Funds average annual NAV total return since inception was 11.0%. We take great pride in RVTs long-term performance record. Nine of the Funds 11 equity sectors were positive contributors to first-half performance. Health Care made the largest positive impact, with Energy, Financials, and Materials also posting respectable net gains. Industrials was the RVTs largest detractor at the sector level, followed by a modest net loss in the Consumer Discretionary sector. The portfolios largest contributor to performance at the industry level was biotechnology, largely as a result of net gains from two of the Funds top-five contributing stocks. Idenix Pharmaceuticals focuses on the development of drugs for the treatment of infections caused by HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C. Its stock price was fairly volatile through much of the first half before more than tripling in early June after news that pharmaceutical giant Merck would be acquiring the company at a healthy premium. We began selling after the announcement and had sold our shares by mid-June. Myriad Genetics specializes in molecular diagnostics with a specialty in genetic testing for cancer. The company faced a lot of skepticism after the Supreme Court ruled in June 2013 that human genes could not be patented. We believed that neither the Courts ruling nor |
GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED
Top Contributors to Performance Year-to-Date through 6/30/141 |
|||||||||||
Idenix Pharmaceuticals | 0.45% | ||||||||||
Helmerich & Payne | 0.24 | ||||||||||
Cimarex Energy | 0.19 | ||||||||||
Myriad Genetics | 0.18 | ||||||||||
Harman International Industries | 0.15 | ||||||||||
1 Includes dividends. | |||||||||||
Important Performance and Risk Information
All performance information reflects past performance, is presented on a total return basis, and reflects the reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than performance quoted. Returns as of the most recent month-end may be obtained at www.roycefunds.com. The market price of the Funds shares will fluctuate, so that shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when sold. The Fund invests primarily in securities of small- and micro-cap companies, which may involve considerably more risk than investing in a more diversified portfolio of larger-cap companies. Regarding the two Good Ideas tables shown above, the sum of all contributors to, and all detractors from, performance for all securities in the portfolio would approximate the Funds year-to-date performance for 2014. |
10 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Performance and Portfolio Review
increased business competition would hurt the firms long-term health, and were pleased
that Myriad has been able to continue executing successfully. We were also happy to see the
company acquire Crescendo Bioscience in the first half, a strategic acquisition that adds to
Myriads already promising pipeline.
Tulsa-based Helmerich & Payne is a contract driller with a specialty in high-tech drilling rigs. Its a long-time Royce favorite that we have owned continuously in RVTs portfolio since 1998. Accelerated growth in its order book for new rigs further confirmed that the companys technologically superior rigs are driving market share gains as E&P (exploration & production) companies eager to reduce drilling costs upgrade to Helmerich & Paynes more efficient rigs. We reduced our position as its stock price gushed. Headquartered in Denver, Cimarex Energy is a comparatively new addition whose shares we first purchased in 2002. An E&P business operating primarily in Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico, we have long liked its balance sheet and sizable margins. During the first half its shares seemed to benefit from ongoing production growth in a few different properties. As for positions that detracted from performance, the largest was Advisory Board (The), a research and consulting firm that offers services to the healthcare industry. Organic and subscription revenue growth remains healthy. However, investors seemed to tire of its recently fast-paced M&A activity (five deals in the last 20 months, with more likely ahead), and the near-term negative impact these acquisitions have had on profit margins. Our take is that these acquisitions have generally been of smaller companies that provide footholds and capabilities in other fast-growing healthcare information areas, thus enhancing the firms long-term growth opportunities. We held our shares through the first half. We also opted to hold our position in Preformed Line Products, a company whose shares we have owned since 1986. The company makes products primarily to support, protect, connect, terminate, and secure cables and wires for the energy, communications, cable provider, and information industries. A weaker global market for infrastructure projects first led its shares to plummet in November 2013. The lack of any sustained earnings recovery continued to hurt its stock. |
GOOD
IDEAS AT THE TIME
|
|
Advisory Board (The) | -0.14% |
Preformed Line Products | -0.14 |
Ethan Allen Interiors | -0.13 |
LKQ Corporation | -0.13 |
KBR | -0.12 |
1 Net of dividends. | |
MARKET PRICE PERFORMANCE HISTORY SINCE INCEPTION (11/26/86) through 6/30/14 | |
2 Reflects the actual market price of one share as it traded on the NYSE. |
FUND INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS | |||
Fund Total Net Assets | $1,317 million | ||
Number of Holdings | 547 | ||
Turnover Rate | 20% | ||
Symbol | |||
Market Price | RVT | ||
NAV | XRVTX | ||
Average Market Capitalization1 | $1,574 million | ||
Weighted Average P/E Ratio2,3 | 21.0x | ||
Weighted Average P/B Ratio2 | 2.0x | ||
U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets) | 83.4% | ||
Non-U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets) | 14.4% | ||
1 Geometric Average. This weighted calculation uses each portfolio holdings market cap in a way designed to not skew the effect of very large or small holdings; instead, it aims to better identify the portfolios center, which Royce believes offers a more accurate measure of average market cap than a simple mean or median. |
|||
2 Harmonic Average. This weighted calculation evaluates a portfolio as if it were a single stock and measures it overall. It compares the total market value of the portfolio to the portfolios share in the earnings or book value, as the case may be, of its underlying stocks. |
|||
3 The Funds P/E ratio calculation excludes companies with zero or negative earnings (12% of portfolio holdings as of 6/30/14). |
|||
DOWN MARKET PERFORMANCE COMPARISON |
|||
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 11 |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
AVERAGE ANNUAL NAV TOTAL RETURNS Through 6/30/14 |
||||||||||
JanuaryJune 20141 | 3.06 | % | ||||||||
One-Year | 31.32 | |||||||||
Three-Year | 16.09 | |||||||||
Five-Year | 20.67 | |||||||||
10-Year | 9.09 | |||||||||
15-Year | 11.65 | |||||||||
20-Year | 12.04 | |||||||||
Since Inception (12/14/93) | 11.78 | |||||||||
1 Not Annualized | ||||||||||
CALENDAR YEAR NAV TOTAL RETURNS | ||||||||||
Year | RMT | Year | RMT | |||||||
2013 | 44.5 | % | 2005 | 6.8 | % | |||||
2012 | 17.3 | 2004 | 18.7 | |||||||
2011 | -7.7 | 2003 | 55.5 | |||||||
2010 | 28.5 | 2002 | -13.8 | |||||||
2009 | 46.5 | 2001 | 23.4 | |||||||
2008 | -45.5 | 2000 | 10.9 | |||||||
2007 | 0.6 | 1999 | 12.7 | |||||||
2006 | 22.5 | 1998 | -4.1 | |||||||
TOP 10 POSITIONS % of Net Assets | ||||||||||
Integrated Electrical Services | 1.4 | % | ||||||||
MVC Capital | 1.1 | |||||||||
Tennant Company | 1.0 | |||||||||
Universal Electronics | 1.0 | |||||||||
Mesa Laboratories | 1.0 | |||||||||
Exactech | 1.0 | |||||||||
Seneca Foods | 1.0 | |||||||||
Drew Industries | 1.0 | |||||||||
NN | 1.0 | |||||||||
Flexsteel Industries | 1.0 | |||||||||
PORTFOLIO SECTOR BREAKDOWN % of Net Assets | ||||||||||
Industrials | 25.5 | % | ||||||||
Information Technology | 19.2 | |||||||||
Financials | 16.0 | |||||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 15.3 | |||||||||
Health Care | 8.3 | |||||||||
Materials | 7.5 | |||||||||
Energy | 2.6 | |||||||||
Consumer Staples | 1.6 | |||||||||
Utilities | 0.1 | |||||||||
Miscellaneous | 3.7 | |||||||||
Preferred Stock | 0.3 | |||||||||
Outstanding Line of Credit, Net of Cash and Cash Equivalents | -0.1 | |||||||||
Managers Discussion
Royce Micro-Cap Trust (RMT) gained 3.1% on an NAV (net asset value) basis and 3.9% on a market price basis for the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2014 compared to its unleveraged benchmarks, the Russell 2000 Index and Russell Microcap Index, which had respective gains of 3.2% and 1.6%, for the same period. We were pleased with the Funds results in the first half, which remained solid on both an absolute and relative basis after a particularly good year in 2013 for both the Fund and micro-cap stocks more generally. 2014 began with many share prices accelerating at a much slower pace than they did in the torrid second half of 2013. For the first quarter of 2014, RMT stayed in step on an NAV basis, though it fell out of step with the market as a wholeand micro-caps more specificallyduring the more moderate market that ushered in the year. The Fund advanced 1.3% in the first quarter on an NAV basis while falling 1.2% based on market price compared to a gain of 3.0% for the Russell Microcap and 1.1% for the Russell 2000. The Funds results improved in the second quarter, which saw the years only small-cap correction so far. Investors seemed to be trying to determine the effects on the market of a new Fed chair, a miserable winter, and potentially dangerous international situations in Ukraine and Syria. The verdict was apparently that the first of these was a positive (or at least not a negative), the second temporary, and the third not worth selling stocks over. Small-caps rallied from mid-May through the end of June, which helped RMT to post positive results on both an NAV (+1.7%) and market price basis (+5.1%) for the second quarter. These results helped the Fund to post strong long-term results on both an absolute and relative basis. On an NAV basis the Fund bested the Russell 2000 for the one-, three-, five-, 10-, 15-, 20-year, and since inception (12/14/93) periods ended June 30, 2014. (RMT) beat the small-cap index on a market price basis for each of those aforementioned periods except the 10-year span. The Fund also outpaced the Russell Microcap on both an NAV and market price basis for the one-, three-, five-, and 10-year periods ended June 30, 2014. (Data for the Russell Microcap only goes back to June 2000.) RMTs average annual NAV total return for the since inception period was 11.8%. We remain proud of the Funds 20-plus years of history. Seven of the Funds 10 equity sectors produced net gains in the first half. Health Care led by a wide margin, followed by Financials, Energy, and Materials. Net losses, which were mostly modest at the sector level, came from Industrials and Information |
GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED
Top Contributors to Performance Year-to-Date through 6/30/141 |
|||||||||||
Idenix Pharmaceuticals | 0.66% | ||||||||||
Medical Action Industries | 0.56 | ||||||||||
Rentrak Corporation | 0.45 | ||||||||||
Achillion Pharmaceuticals | 0.35 | ||||||||||
Furiex Pharmaceuticals | 0.34 | ||||||||||
1 Includes dividends. | |||||||||||
Important Performance and Risk Information
All performance information reflects past performance, is presented on a total return basis, and reflects the reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than performance quoted. Returns as of the most recent month-end may be obtained at www.roycefunds.com. Certain immaterial adjustments were made to the net assets of Royce Micro-Cap Trust at 12/31/12 for financial reporting purposes, and as a result the net asset value originally calculated on that date and the total return based on that net asset value differs from the adjusted net asset value and total return reported in the Financial Highlights. The market price of the Funds shares will fluctuate, so that shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when sold. The Fund normally invests in micro-cap companies, which may involve considerably more risk than investing in a more diversified portfolio of larger-cap companies. Regarding the two Good Ideas tables shown above, the sum of all contributors to, and all detractors from, performance for all securities in the portfolio would approximate the Funds year-to-date performance for 2014. |
12 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Performance and Portfolio Review
Technology. The same was true at the industry level, where the leading detractors were
specialty retail, electrical equipment, road & rail, software, and consumer finance. The
most significant net gainers at the industry level were biotechnology, which was out
in front by a considerable margin, machinery, media, and the electronic equipment,
instruments & components group.
Four of the Funds five largest contributors came from the Health Care sector and two of those were slotted in the biotechnology group, including RMTs top performer in the first half, Idenix Pharmaceuticals. The company develops drugs that treat infections caused by HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C. Its stock price was somewhat volatile through much of the first half before more than tripling in early June on the news that pharmaceutical giant Merck would be acquiring the company at a healthy premium. We began selling after the announcement and had sold our shares by mid-June. We also sold our shares of Medical Action Industries, which makes custom procedure trays and minor procedure kits, shortly after the news came out that Owens & Minor would be acquiring the company at a whopping 95% premium. Another example of the urge to merge came with Furiex Pharmaceuticals, which first saw strong results in phase III clinical trials for an IBS treatment before being acquired at a healthy premium. The announcement in April led us to sell our shares. Just the possibility of being acquired, along with restarted trials of a hepatitis C product, were the primary drivers of the rapidly rising share price of Achillion Pharmaceuticals. These developments prompted us to greatly reduce our position in June. As for those positions that detracted, Regional Management extends fixed-rate loans primarily to people with limited access to bank credit, credit cards, and other traditional lenders. Its shares plunged on news of an investigation into possible breaches of its fiduciary duty. We held a small position at the end of June. We also held a small position in PMFG, which provides custom-engineered systems and products primarily for the oil and natural gas industries. Falling revenues and earnings kept investors selling. |
GOOD
IDEAS AT THE TIME
|
|
Regional Management | -0.21% |
PMFG | -0.19 |
Cache | -0.19 |
Patriot Transportation Holding | -0.17 |
Universal Truckload Services | -0.17 |
1 Net of dividends. | |
MARKET PRICE PERFORMANCE HISTORY SINCE INCEPTION (12/14/93) through 6/30/14 | |
2 Reflects the actual market price of one share as it traded on the NYSE and, prior to 12/1/03, on the Nasdaq. |
FUND INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS | |||
Fund Total Net Assets | $437 million | ||
Number of Holdings | 398 | ||
Turnover Rate | 20% | ||
Symbol | |||
Market Price | RMT | ||
NAV | XOTCX | ||
Average Market Capitalization1 | $365 million | ||
Weighted Average P/E Ratio2,3 | 21.8x | ||
Weighted Average P/B Ratio2 | 1.7x | ||
U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets) | 90.4% | ||
Non-U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets) | 9.7% | ||
1 Geometric Average. This weighted calculation uses each portfolio holdings market cap in a way designed to not skew the effect of very large or small holdings; instead, it aims to better identify the portfolios center, which Royce believes offers a more accurate measure of average market cap than a simple mean or median. |
|||
2 Harmonic Average. This weighted calculation evaluates a portfolio as if it were a single stock and measures it overall. It compares the total market value of the portfolio to the portfolios share in the earnings or book value, as the case may be, of its underlying stocks. |
|||
3 The Funds P/E ratio calculation excludes companies with zero or negative earnings (24% of portfolio holdings as of 6/30/14). |
|||
DOWN MARKET PERFORMANCE COMPARISON |
|||
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 13 |
Royce Focus Trust |
AVERAGE ANNUAL NAV TOTAL RETURNS Through 6/30/14 |
||||||||||
JanuaryJune 20141 | 12.74 | % | ||||||||
One-Year | 31.56 | |||||||||
Three-Year | 9.08 | |||||||||
Five-Year | 16.50 | |||||||||
10-Year | 9.59 | |||||||||
15-Year | 11.18 | |||||||||
Since Inception (11/1/96)2 | 11.02 | |||||||||
1 Not Annualized | ||||||||||
CALENDAR YEAR NAV TOTAL RETURNS | ||||||||||
Year | FUND | Year | FUND | |||||||
2013 | 19.7 | % | 2005 | 13.3 | % | |||||
2012 | 11.4 | 2004 | 29.3 | |||||||
2011 | -10.5 | 2003 | 54.3 | |||||||
2010 | 21.8 | 2002 | -12.5 | |||||||
2009 | 54.0 | 2001 | 10.0 | |||||||
2008 | -42.7 | 2000 | 20.9 | |||||||
2007 | 12.2 | 1999 | 8.7 | |||||||
2006 | 15.8 | 1998 | -6.8 | |||||||
TOP 10 POSITIONS % of Net Assets | ||||||||||
Western Digital | 4.5 | % | ||||||||
Myriad Genetics | 4.4 | |||||||||
Apple | 3.7 | |||||||||
Franklin Resources | 3.5 | |||||||||
Berkshire Hathaway Cl. B | 3.0 | |||||||||
SanDisk Corporation | 2.9 | |||||||||
Cirrus Logic | 2.9 | |||||||||
Exxon Mobil | 2.8 | |||||||||
Thor Industries | 2.8 | |||||||||
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings | 2.6 | |||||||||
PORTFOLIO SECTOR BREAKDOWN % of Net Assets | ||||||||||
Materials | 20.6 | % | ||||||||
Information Technology | 18.4 | |||||||||
Financials | 16.5 | |||||||||
Energy | 13.4 | |||||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 8.1 | |||||||||
Industrials | 7.8 | |||||||||
Consumer Staples | 6.6 | |||||||||
Health Care | 5.7 | |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 2.9 | |||||||||
Managers Discussion
We were very pleased with the strong first half enjoyed by Royce Focus Trust (FUND) on both an absolute and relative basis. The Fund gained an impressive 12.7% on an NAV (net asset value) basis and 15.0% based on market price for the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2014, in both cases more than doubling the 5.9% advance for its benchmark, the Russell 2500 Index, for the same period. The Fund got off to a strong start that slackened only briefly when stocks were enduring their only bout with volatility thus far during parts of March, April, and May. Otherwise, the waters were mostly calm. After a magnificently bullish 2013, the pace of equity returns slowed as 2014 got under way. In the first quarter FUND was up 5.2% on an NAV basis and 5.8% on a market price basis. Many investors paused prior to the end of the first quarter, perhaps wondering what the effects might be of a bitter winter, a new Federal Reserve chair, and worrisome geopolitical happenings. For the most part, stocks rallied, with results largely positive from mid-May through the end of June. For the second quarter, which included the bulk of the brief corrective phase, FUND advanced 7.1% based on its NAV and 8.7% based on its market price while the Russell 2500 rose 3.6%. We were happy to see the Fund rebound at a time when the economy is both growing and returning to something like the Old Normal with the role of the Fed gradually diminishing. Such an environment looks promising in our view for active and disciplined managers who emphasize long-term time horizons and absolute returns. FUND outpaced the Russell 2500 for the one-, 15-year, and since inception of our management (11/1/96) periods ended June 30, 2014. The Funds average annual NAV total return since inception was 11.0%. We remain proud of FUNDs long-term performance record. Over the last five years, we have been building positions in several economically sensitive, cyclical sectors, including Energy, Industrials, Materials, and Information Technology. Going back as far as 2009 in some instances, many stocks in these areas looked strong to us on both an absolute and relative basis, in particular on the level of balance sheet strength, returns on invested capital, and P/E ratios. Through the first half of 2013, many of the companies that we liked in these sectors, such as Canadian energy services businesses, had not yet seen much, if any, share price recovery. This began to turn around in the second half of last year. Coupled with declining correlation levels across all equity asset classes, these developments left us feeling very confident in the ongoing prospects for many of our holdings in cyclical sectors. Three of the four sectors mentioned aboveEnergy, Information Technology, and Materialsmade the greatest net contributions to results for the year-to-date period. Energy led by a good-sized margin, driven by robust results for several long-term holdings in the |
GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED
Top Contributors to Performance Year-to-Date through 6/30/141 |
|||||||||||
Myriad Genetics | 2.66% | ||||||||||
Helmerich & Payne | 1.28 | ||||||||||
SanDisk Corporation | 1.08 | ||||||||||
Trican Well Service | 0.72 | ||||||||||
Pason Systems | 0.71 | ||||||||||
1 Includes dividends. | |||||||||||
Important Performance and Risk Information
All performance information reflects past performance, is presented on a total return basis, and reflects the reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than performance quoted. Returns as of the most recent month-end may be obtained at www.roycefunds.com. The market price of the Funds shares will fluctuate, so that shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when sold. The Fund normally invests primarily in small-cap companies, which may involve considerably more risk than investing in a more diversified portfolio of larger-cap companies. Regarding the two Good Ideas tables shown above, the sum of all contributors to, and all detractors from, performance for all securities in the portfolio would approximate the Funds year-to-date performance for 2014. |
14 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Performance and Portfolio Review
energy equipment & services industry, where the bulk of the portfolios positions in that
sector are slotted. Renewed demand helped Helmerich & Payne, a company we have long
admired for its status as a leader in manufacturing technologically superior rigs and related
equipment. Other energy businesses are seeing the benefit in using Helmerichs wares, as
upgrading to its more efficient rigs helps to drive down drilling costs. Trican Well Service is
the largest pressure pumping service provider in Canada and a leading fracturing company
in Russia. FUNDs twelfth largest holding at the end of June, the company benefited from a
recovery in the demand for its services in Canada and the U.S. for fracking and other well-related
services.
Outside of the Energy sector, we were very pleased with the comeback of Myriad Genetics. A molecular diagnostic company that specializes in genetic testing for cancer, its share price fell rapidly in the wake of a mixed ruling from the Supreme Court in June 2013, which held that human genes cannot be patented. Many investors were concerned that the company would struggle to compete or be profitable in the light of this decision. The stock began to recover in the first quarter of 2014. Though its price was a bit volatile during the second quarter, we remain confident. It remains a leader in genetic testing with a variety of industry-standard tools for detecting hereditary cancer risk. Fiscal third-quarter revenues, announced in May, were up, helping to make fiscal 2014 nicely profitable. Top-six position SanDisk Corporation provides data storage products and solutions, including flash memory, proprietary controller and firmware technologies, as well as USB drives, digital media players, and other components. Capacity concerns have abated and global demand has been growing, both of which helped its shares to rise in the first half. As for those holdings that struggled, we also remain confident in the long-term prospects for personal skin care product maker and distributor Nu Skin Enterprises. The company resolved some distribution issues in China, which accounts for about a third of its growing global business, by paying a small fine. |
GOOD
IDEAS AT THE TIME
|
|
Nu Skin Enterprises Cl. A | -1.05% |
Buckle (The) | -0.41 |
GameStop Corporation Cl. A | -0.38 |
Patriot Transportation Holding | -0.37 |
Medicines Company (The) | -0.33 |
1 Net of dividends. | |
MARKET PRICE PERFORMANCE HISTORY SINCE INCEPTION (11/1/96)3 through 6/30/14 | |
1 Reflects the cumulative total return experience of a continuous common stockholder who reinvested all distributions
and fully participated in the primary subscription of the 2005 rights offering. |
|||
2 Reflects the actual market price of one share as it traded on Nasdaq. |
|||
3 Royce & Associates assumed investment management responsibility for the Fund on 11/1/96. |
FUND INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS | |||
Fund Total Net Assets | $213 million | ||
Number of Holdings | 50 | ||
Turnover Rate | 13% | ||
Symbol | |||
Market Price | FUND | ||
NAV | XFUNX | ||
Average Market Capitalization1 | $6,634 million | ||
Weighted Average P/E Ratio2,3 | 18.1x | ||
Weighted Average P/B Ratio2 | 2.4x | ||
U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets) | 66.2% | ||
Non-U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets) | 30.9% | ||
1 Geometric Average. This weighted calculation uses each portfolio holdings market cap in a way designed to not skew the effect of very large or small holdings; instead, it aims to better identify the portfolios center, which Royce believes offers a more accurate measure of average market cap than a simple mean or median. |
|||
2 Harmonic Average. This weighted calculation evaluates a portfolio as if it were a single stock and measures it overall. It compares the total market value of the portfolio to the portfolios share in the earnings, or book value, as the case may be, of its underlying stocks. |
|||
3 The Funds P/E ratio calculation excludes companies with zero or negative earnings (16% of portfolio holdings as of 6/30/14). |
|||
DOWN MARKET PERFORMANCE COMPARISON |
|||
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 15 |
Royce Global Value Trust |
CUMULATIVE NAV TOTAL RETURN Through 6/30/14 |
||||||||||
JanuaryJune 2014 | 5.57 | % | ||||||||
Since Inception (10/17/13) | 8.49 | |||||||||
TOP 10 POSITIONS % of Net Assets | ||||||||||
Consort Medical | 1.5 | % | ||||||||
Television Broadcasts | 1.5 | |||||||||
Lazard Cl. A | 1.5 | |||||||||
Midland Holdings | 1.4 | |||||||||
CETIP - Mercados Organizados | 1.4 | |||||||||
Stallergenes | 1.4 | |||||||||
Pico Far East Holdings | 1.4 | |||||||||
Ashmore Group | 1.4 | |||||||||
Mayr-Melnhof Karton | 1.4 | |||||||||
Gaztransport Et Technigaz | 1.3 | |||||||||
PORTFOLIO SECTOR BREAKDOWN % of Net Assets | ||||||||||
Industrials | 20.1 | % | ||||||||
Financials | 18.7 | |||||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 18.0 | |||||||||
Materials | 16.4 | |||||||||
Information Technology | 13.5 | |||||||||
Health Care | 7.1 | |||||||||
Energy | 2.7 | |||||||||
Consumer Staples | 2.6 | |||||||||
Diversified Investment Companies | 0.8 | |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 0.1 | |||||||||
Managers Discussion
For the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2014 Royce Global Value Trust Fund (RGT) climbed 5.6% on an NAV (net asset value basis) and 5.9% on a market price basis, essentially sandwiching its benchmark, the Russell Global Small Cap Index, which was up 5.7% for the same period. We were pleased with the Funds performance. While slightly shy of its benchmark on an NAV basis, first-half results nonetheless bolstered our confidence in RGTs prospects for strong absolute results going forward. The Fund came into existence as a spin-off from Royce Value Trust (RVT) at the rate of one share of Global Trust common stock for every seven shares of RVT common stock owned. RGTs investment goal is long-term growth of capital. The Fund invests in a broadly diversified portfolio of both U.S. and non-U.S. small-cap stocks. Chuck Royce manages the Fund while Royce veterans Chris Flynn and David Nadel serve as assistant portfolio managers. Although most non-U.S. markets did not match the feverish pace of their small-cap stateside cousins in 2013, they did fine on an NAV basis before going on to enjoy a stronger first half of 2014. For the first quarter, the Fund rose 1.4% on an absolute basis and 1.0% on market price basis. A strengthening Europe helped to compensate for a generally less robust Asia during the first few months of 2014. There were notable contributions from portfolio holdings in Canada, France, and Italy in the first quarter as well as trouble spots for positions headquartered in Hong Kong and the U.S. For the second quarter, returns were stronger both here in the U.S. and abroad, the latter helped by a recovery for many Asian companies. This was most noticeable for positions headquartered in Japan, which overcame first-quarter net losses to post a significant contribution for both the second quarter and semiannual period. Portfolio holdings in Canada also enjoyed a strong second quarter, helped by net gains in a number of industries. RGT was thus able to take advantage of the markets growing strength, increasing 4.1% for the second quarter on an NAV basis and 4.8% on a market price basis. (The Russell Global Small Cap Index grew 3.3% for the same period.) The Funds cumulative NAV return from inception (10/17/13) through June 30, 2014 was 8.5%. All of the Funds nine equity sectors finished the first half in positive territory, with Financials, Information Technology, and Materials making the largest positive contributions. At the industry level, second-quarter strength was apparent, with the capital markets, auto |
GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED
Top Contributors to Performance Year-to-Date through 6/30/141 |
|||||||||||
CETIP - Mercados Organizados | 0.46% | ||||||||||
DeLonghi | 0.43 | ||||||||||
BBVA Banco Frances ADR | 0.42 | ||||||||||
China XD Plastics | 0.40 | ||||||||||
Franco-Nevada Corporation | 0.34 | ||||||||||
1 Includes dividends. | |||||||||||
Important Performance and Risk Information
All performance information reflects past performance, is presented on a total return basis, and reflects the reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than performance quoted. Returns as of the most recent month-end may be obtained at www.roycefunds.com. Certain immaterial adjustments were made to the net assets of Royce Global Value Trust at 6/30/14 for financial reporting purposes, and as a result the net asset value originally calculated on that date and the total return based on that net asset value differs from the adjusted net asset value and total return reported in the Financial Highlights. The market price of the Funds shares will fluctuate, so that shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when sold. The Fund invests primarily in securities of small- and micro-cap companies, which may involve considerably more risk than investments in securities of larger-cap companies. The Funds broadly diversified portfolio does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss. From time to time, the Fund may invest a significant portion of its net assets in foreign securities, which may involve political, economic, currency and other risks not encountered in U.S. investments. The market price of the Funds shares will fluctuate, so that shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when sold. Regarding the two Good Ideas tables shown above, the sum of all contributors to, and all detractors from, performance for all securities in the portfolio would approximate the Funds year-to-date performance for 2014. |
16 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Performance and Portfolio Review
components, household durables, and semiconductors & semiconductor equipment groups
leading in the first half. Detracting most from first-half results at the industry level were air
freight & logistics companies, media stocks, and multiline retailers. Coming from the first
of these three groups, New Jersey-based UTi Worldwide is a global supply chain logistics
services and solutions company that operates on multiple platforms helping a variety of
industries. Its business was hurt by lower freight-forwarding volumes and pricing as well
as by delays in collecting receivables. All of this caused the company to violate its debt
covenants, resulting in an expensive and dilutive recapitalization. We chose to hold shares
in the hope of a turnaround. We built our position in Pico Far East Holdings, a Hong
Kong-based business that makes displays for companies presenting at conventions. We like
that major global brands such as Mercedes Benz, Lexus, and Citibank trust the company
to accurately portray their brand images. The slowdown in Chinas economy hurt Pico Far
East Holdings business, but management keeps a close eye on costs and focuses on the long
term, traits that inspire our confidence.
The Funds top contributing stock was top-five position CETIP-Mercados Organizados, which organizes the over-the-counter (OTC) markets in Brazil. The company offers an electronic platform for conducting online transactions, such as auctions and government bond trading, corporate bonds, and fixed income securities. CETIP also provides central securities depository, outsourcing, market data, and risk management services. Its shares rose on what we suspect was a flight to company quality in Brazils first-half bear market. DeLonghi is an Italian company which owns a collection of consumer brands in the domestic appliance market, such as coffee makers, food processors, electric ovens, kettles, toasters, and more. Its stock performance in the first half of 2014 was largely generated in the first quarter after reporting solid earnings for 2013. It also benefited from investors generally increased risk appetite for Italian stocks. We trimmed our stake throughout the first half. The oldest private bank in Argentina and the nations third largest, BBVA Banco Frances ADR has posted both strong earnings and given an improved outlook so far in 2014, both of which seemed to attract more investors to its shares. We began to sell our shares of specialty chemical company China XD Plastics in May when improved revenues and earnings led to a spike in its stock, which then corrected amid questions about the veracity of its reported results. |
GOOD
IDEAS AT THE TIME
|
|
UTi Worldwide | -0.50% |
Pico Far East Holdings | -0.46 |
New World Department Store China | -0.38 |
LPS Brasil Consultoria de Imoveis | -0.23 |
LPKF Laser & Electronics | -0.22 |
1 Net of dividends. | |
FUND INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS | |||
Fund Total Net Assets | $108 million | ||
Number of Holdings | 167 | ||
Turnover Rate | 21% | ||
Symbol | |||
Market Price | RGT | ||
NAV | XRGTX | ||
Average Market Capitalization1 | $1,136 million | ||
Weighted Average P/E Ratio2,3 | 15.3x | ||
Weighted Average P/B Ratio2 | 1.9x | ||
1 Geometric Average. This weighted calculation uses each portfolio holdings market cap in a way designed to not skew the effect of very large or small holdings; instead, it aims to better identify the portfolios center, which Royce believes offers a more accurate measure of average market cap than a simple mean or median. |
|||
2 Harmonic Average. This weighted calculation evaluates a portfolio as if it were a single stock and measures it overall. It compares the total market value of the portfolio to the portfolios share in the earnings or book value, as the case may be, of its underlying stocks. |
|||
3 The Funds P/E ratio calculation excludes companies with zero or negative earnings (13% of portfolio holdings as of 6/30/14). |
|||
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 17 |
History Since Inception |
The following table details the share accumulations by an initial investor in the Funds who reinvested all distributions and participated fully in primary subscriptions for each of the rights offerings. Full participation in distribution reinvestments and rights offerings can maximize the returns available to a long-term investor. This table should be read in conjunction with the Performance and Portfolio Reviews of the Funds.
Amount | Purchase | NAV | Market | ||||||||||||||||||||
History | Invested | Price1 | Shares | Value2 | Value2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Royce Value Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||||
11/26/86 | Initial Purchase | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10.000 | 1,000 | $ | 9,280 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||||||||
10/15/87 | Distribution $0.30 | 7.000 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/87 | Distribution $0.22 | 7.125 | 32 | 8,578 | 7,250 | ||||||||||||||||||
12/27/88 | Distribution $0.51 | 8.625 | 63 | 10,529 | 9,238 | ||||||||||||||||||
9/22/89 | Rights Offering | 405 | 9.000 | 45 | |||||||||||||||||||
12/29/89 | Distribution $0.52 | 9.125 | 67 | 12,942 | 11,866 | ||||||||||||||||||
9/24/90 | Rights Offering | 457 | 7.375 | 62 | |||||||||||||||||||
12/31/90 | Distribution $0.32 | 8.000 | 52 | 11,713 | 11,074 | ||||||||||||||||||
9/23/91 | Rights Offering | 638 | 9.375 | 68 | |||||||||||||||||||
12/31/91 | Distribution $0.61 | 10.625 | 82 | 17,919 | 15,697 | ||||||||||||||||||
9/25/92 | Rights Offering | 825 | 11.000 | 75 | |||||||||||||||||||
12/31/92 | Distribution $0.90 | 12.500 | 114 | 21,999 | 20,874 | ||||||||||||||||||
9/27/93 | Rights Offering | 1,469 | 13.000 | 113 | |||||||||||||||||||
12/31/93 | Distribution $1.15 | 13.000 | 160 | 26,603 | 25,428 | ||||||||||||||||||
10/28/94 | Rights Offering | 1,103 | 11.250 | 98 | |||||||||||||||||||
12/19/94 | Distribution $1.05 | 11.375 | 191 | 27,939 | 24,905 | ||||||||||||||||||
11/3/95 | Rights Offering | 1,425 | 12.500 | 114 | |||||||||||||||||||
12/7/95 | Distribution $1.29 | 12.125 | 253 | 35,676 | 31,243 | ||||||||||||||||||
12/6/96 | Distribution $1.15 | 12.250 | 247 | 41,213 | 36,335 | ||||||||||||||||||
1997 | Annual distribution total $1.21 | 15.374 | 230 | 52,556 | 46,814 | ||||||||||||||||||
1998 | Annual distribution total $1.54 | 14.311 | 347 | 54,313 | 47,506 | ||||||||||||||||||
1999 | Annual distribution total $1.37 | 12.616 | 391 | 60,653 | 50,239 | ||||||||||||||||||
2000 | Annual distribution total $1.48 | 13.972 | 424 | 70,711 | 61,648 | ||||||||||||||||||
2001 | Annual distribution total $1.49 | 15.072 | 437 | 81,478 | 73,994 | ||||||||||||||||||
2002 | Annual distribution total $1.51 | 14.903 | 494 | 68,770 | 68,927 | ||||||||||||||||||
1/28/03 | Rights Offering | 5,600 | 10.770 | 520 | |||||||||||||||||||
2003 | Annual distribution total $1.30 | 14.582 | 516 | 106,216 | 107,339 | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | Annual distribution total $1.55 | 17.604 | 568 | 128,955 | 139,094 | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 | Annual distribution total $1.61 | 18.739 | 604 | 139,808 | 148,773 | ||||||||||||||||||
2006 | Annual distribution total $1.78 | 19.696 | 693 | 167,063 | 179,945 | ||||||||||||||||||
2007 | Annual distribution total $1.85 | 19.687 | 787 | 175,469 | 165,158 | ||||||||||||||||||
2008 | Annual distribution total $1.723 | 12.307 | 1,294 | 95,415 | 85,435 | ||||||||||||||||||
3/11/09 | Distribution $0.323 | 6.071 | 537 | 137,966 | 115,669 | ||||||||||||||||||
12/2/10 | Distribution $0.03 | 13.850 | 23 | 179,730 | 156,203 | ||||||||||||||||||
2011 | Annual distribution total $0.783 | 13.043 | 656 | 161,638 | 139,866 | ||||||||||||||||||
2012 | Annual distribution total $0.80 | 13.063 | 714 | 186,540 | 162,556 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | Annual distribution total $2.194 | 16.647 | 1,658 | 250,219 | 220,474 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | Year-to-Date distribution total $0.62 | 15.792 | 546 | ||||||||||||||||||||
6/30/14 | $ | 21,922 | 14,317 | $ | 257,706 | $ | 229,072 | ||||||||||||||||
18 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
The following table details the share accumulations by an initial investor in the Funds who reinvested all distributions and participated fully in primary subscriptions for each of the rights offerings. Full participation in distribution reinvestments and rights offerings can maximize the returns available to a long-term investor. This table should be read in conjunction with the Performance and Portfolio Reviews of the Funds.
Amount | Purchase | NAV | Market | |||||||||||||||||||
History | Invested | Price1 | Shares | Value2 | Value2 | |||||||||||||||||
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | ||||||||||||||||||||||
12/14/93 | Initial Purchase | $ | 7,500 | $ | 7.500 | 1,000 | $ | 7,250 | $ | 7,500 | ||||||||||||
10/28/94 | Rights Offering | 1,400 | 7.000 | 200 | ||||||||||||||||||
12/19/94 | Distribution $0.05 | 6.750 | 9 | 9,163 | 8,462 | |||||||||||||||||
12/7/95 | Distribution $0.36 | 7.500 | 58 | 11,264 | 10,136 | |||||||||||||||||
12/6/96 | Distribution $0.80 | 7.625 | 133 | 13,132 | 11,550 | |||||||||||||||||
12/5/97 | Distribution $1.00 | 10.000 | 140 | 16,694 | 15,593 | |||||||||||||||||
12/7/98 | Distribution $0.29 | 8.625 | 52 | 16,016 | 14,129 | |||||||||||||||||
12/6/99 | Distribution $0.27 | 8.781 | 49 | 18,051 | 14,769 | |||||||||||||||||
12/6/00 | Distribution $1.72 | 8.469 | 333 | 20,016 | 17,026 | |||||||||||||||||
12/6/01 | Distribution $0.57 | 9.880 | 114 | 24,701 | 21,924 | |||||||||||||||||
2002 | Annual distribution total $0.80 | 9.518 | 180 | 21,297 | 19,142 | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | Annual distribution total $0.92 | 10.004 | 217 | 33,125 | 31,311 | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | Annual distribution total $1.33 | 13.350 | 257 | 39,320 | 41,788 | |||||||||||||||||
2005 | Annual distribution total $1.85 | 13.848 | 383 | 41,969 | 45,500 | |||||||||||||||||
2006 | Annual distribution total $1.55 | 14.246 | 354 | 51,385 | 57,647 | |||||||||||||||||
2007 | Annual distribution total $1.35 | 13.584 | 357 | 51,709 | 45,802 | |||||||||||||||||
2008 | Annual distribution total $1.193 | 8.237 | 578 | 28,205 | 24,807 | |||||||||||||||||
3/11/09 | Distribution $0.223 | 4.260 | 228 | 41,314 | 34,212 | |||||||||||||||||
12/2/10 | Distribution $0.08 | 9.400 | 40 | 53,094 | 45,884 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | Annual distribution total $0.533 | 8.773 | 289 | 49,014 | 43,596 | |||||||||||||||||
2012 | Annual distribution total $0.51 | 9.084 | 285 | 57,501 | 49,669 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | Annual distribution total $1.38 | 11.864 | 630 | 83,110 | 74,222 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | Year-to-Date distribution total $0.47 | 12.466 | 244 | |||||||||||||||||||
6/30/14 | $ | 8,900 | 6,110 | $ | 85,662 | $ | 77,102 | |||||||||||||||
Royce Focus Trust | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10/31/96 | Initial Purchase | $ | 4,375 | $ | 4.375 | 1,000 | $ | 5,280 | $ | 4,375 | ||||||||||||
12/31/96 | 5,520 | 4,594 | ||||||||||||||||||||
12/5/97 | Distribution $0.53 | 5.250 | 101 | 6,650 | 5,574 | |||||||||||||||||
12/31/98 | 6,199 | 5,367 | ||||||||||||||||||||
12/6/99 | Distribution $0.145 | 4.750 | 34 | 6,742 | 5,356 | |||||||||||||||||
12/6/00 | Distribution $0.34 | 5.563 | 69 | 8,151 | 6,848 | |||||||||||||||||
12/6/01 | Distribution $0.14 | 6.010 | 28 | 8,969 | 8,193 | |||||||||||||||||
12/6/02 | Distribution $0.09 | 5.640 | 19 | 7,844 | 6,956 | |||||||||||||||||
12/8/03 | Distribution $0.62 | 8.250 | 94 | 12,105 | 11,406 | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | Annual distribution total $1.74 | 9.325 | 259 | 15,639 | 16,794 | |||||||||||||||||
5/6/05 | Rights offering | 2,669 | 8.340 | 320 | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 | Annual distribution total $1.21 | 9.470 | 249 | 21,208 | 20,709 | |||||||||||||||||
2006 | Annual distribution total $1.57 | 9.860 | 357 | 24,668 | 27,020 | |||||||||||||||||
2007 | Annual distribution total $2.01 | 9.159 | 573 | 27,679 | 27,834 | |||||||||||||||||
2008 | Annual distribution total $0.473 | 6.535 | 228 | 15,856 | 15,323 | |||||||||||||||||
3/11/09 | Distribution $0.093 | 3.830 | 78 | 24,408 | 21,579 | |||||||||||||||||
12/31/10 | 29,726 | 25,806 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | Annual distribution total $0.413 | 6.894 | 207 | 26,614 | 22,784 | |||||||||||||||||
2012 | Annual distribution total $0.46 | 6.686 | 255 | 29,652 | 25,549 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | Annual distribution total $0.40 | 7.222 | 219 | 35,501 | 31,166 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | Year-to-Date distribution total $0.20 | 8.150 | 101 | |||||||||||||||||||
6/30/14 | $ | 7,044 | 4,191 | $ | 40,024 | $ | 35,833 | |||||||||||||||
Royce Global Value Trust | ||||||||||||||||||||||
10/17/13 | Initial Purchase | $ | 8,975 | $ | 8.975 | 1,000 | $ | 9,780 | $ | 8,975 | ||||||||||||
12/31/13 | 10,050 | 8,890 | ||||||||||||||||||||
6/30/14 | $ | 8,975 | 1,000 | $ | 10,610 | $ | 9,410 | |||||||||||||||
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 19 |
Distribution Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Options Why should I reinvest my distributions?
By reinvesting distributions, a stockholder can maintain an undiluted investment in the Fund. The regular reinvestment of distributions has a significant impact on stockholder returns. In contrast, the stockholder who takes distributions in cash is penalized when shares are issued below net asset value to other stockholders. How does the reinvestment of distributions from the Royce closed-end funds work? The Funds automatically issue shares in payment of distributions unless you indicate otherwise. The shares are generally issued at the lower of the market price or net asset value on the valuation date. How does this apply to registered stockholders? If your shares are registered directly with a Fund, your distributions are automatically reinvested unless you have otherwise instructed the Funds transfer agent, Computershare, in writing, in which case you will receive your distribution in cash. A registered stockholder also may have the option to receive the distribution in the form of a stock certificate. What if my shares are held by a brokerage firm or a bank? If your shares are held by a brokerage firm, bank, or other intermediary as the stockholder of record, you should contact your brokerage firm or bank to be certain that it is automatically reinvesting distributions on your behalf. If they are unable to reinvest distributions on behalf, you should have your shares registered in your name in order to participate. What other features are available for registered stockholders? The Distribution Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plans also allow registered stockholders to make optional cash purchases of shares of a Funds common stock directly through Computershare on a monthly basis, and to deposit certificates representing your RVT, RMT and FUND shares with Computershare for safekeeping. (RGT does not issue shares in certificated form). Plan participants are subject to a $0.75 service fee for each voluntary cash purchase under the Plans. The Funds investment adviser is absorbing all commissions on optional cash purchases under the Plans through June 30, 2014. How do the Plans work for registered stockholders? Computershare maintains the accounts for registered stockholders in the Plans and sends written confirmation of all transactions in the account. Shares in the account of each participant will be held by Computershare in non-certificated form in the name of the participant, and each participant will be able to vote those shares at a stockholder meeting or by proxy. A participant may also send stock certificates for RVT, RMT and FUND held by them to Computershare to be held in non-certificated form. RGT does not issue shares in certificated form. There is no service fee charged to participants for reinvesting distributions. If a participant elects to sell shares from a Plan account, Computershare will deduct a $2.50 service fee from the sale transaction. The Funds investment adviser is absorbing all commissions on optional sales under the Plans through June 30, 2014. If a nominee is the registered owner of your shares, the nominee will maintain the accounts on your behalf. How can I get more information on the Plans? You can call an Investor Services Representative at (800) 221-4268 or you can request a copy of the Plan for your Fund from Computershare. All correspondence (including notifications) should be directed to: [Name of Fund] Distribution Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan, c/o Computershare, PO Box 43078, Providence, RI 02940-3078, telephone (800) 426-5523 (from 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.). |
20 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Royce Value Trust | June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | |||||||
COMMON STOCKS 97.7% | ||||||||
Consumer Discretionary 11.2% | ||||||||
Auto Components - 0.6% | ||||||||
Drew Industries |
11,191 | $ | 559,662 | |||||
Gentex Corporation 1 |
111,000 | 3,228,990 | ||||||
Selamat Sempurna |
8,267,600 | 3,099,914 | ||||||
Standard Motor Products |
20,852 | 931,459 | ||||||
7,820,025 | ||||||||
Automobiles - 0.9% | ||||||||
Thor Industries 1 |
107,630 | 6,120,918 | ||||||
Winnebago Industries 2 |
211,400 | 5,323,052 | ||||||
11,443,970 | ||||||||
Distributors - 0.9% | ||||||||
Core-Mark Holding Company |
11,200 | 511,056 | ||||||
Genuine Parts |
5,300 | 465,340 | ||||||
LKQ Corporation 2 |
297,200 | 7,932,268 | ||||||
Weyco Group |
97,992 | 2,685,961 | ||||||
11,594,625 | ||||||||
Diversified Consumer Services - 1.1% | ||||||||
Benesse Holdings |
40,000 | 1,735,354 | ||||||
Career Education 2 |
20,000 | 93,600 | ||||||
Collectors Universe |
72,300 | 1,416,357 | ||||||
MegaStudy |
15,000 | 895,434 | ||||||
233,800 | 3,291,904 | |||||||
Sothebys 1 |
118,700 | 4,984,213 | ||||||
Universal Technical Institute |
140,432 | 1,704,844 | ||||||
14,121,706 | ||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure - 0.0% | ||||||||
Ambassadors Group 2 |
32,100 | 147,981 | ||||||
6,000 | 105,600 | |||||||
253,581 | ||||||||
Household Durables - 2.8% | ||||||||
DeLonghi |
45,000 | 973,572 | ||||||
Ekornes |
80,000 | 1,066,214 | ||||||
Ethan Allen Interiors |
320,800 | 7,936,592 | ||||||
Forbo Holding |
900 | 959,574 | ||||||
Garmin |
8,062 | 490,976 | ||||||
Harman International Industries |
57,200 | 6,144,996 | ||||||
Lifetime Brands |
54,426 | 855,577 | ||||||
53,400 | 7,387,356 | |||||||
Natuzzi ADR 2 |
2,096,300 | 5,387,491 | ||||||
NVR 2 |
2,700 | 3,106,620 | ||||||
1,012,235 | 2,712,790 | |||||||
37,021,758 | ||||||||
Internet & Catalog Retail - 0.1% | ||||||||
Manutan International |
20,000 | 1,279,748 | ||||||
Takkt |
35,000 | 641,723 | ||||||
1,921,471 | ||||||||
Leisure Products - 0.8% | ||||||||
Beneteau 2 |
45,000 | 820,450 | ||||||
LeapFrog Enterprises Cl. A 2 |
30,000 | 220,500 | ||||||
Nautilus 2 |
803,900 | 8,915,251 | ||||||
Shimano |
13,400 | 1,486,758 | ||||||
11,442,959 | ||||||||
Media - 1.2% | ||||||||
E.W. Scripps Company Cl. A 2 |
55,900 | 1,182,844 | ||||||
Media Chinese International |
6,650,000 | 1,988,166 | ||||||
Morningstar |
84,600 | 6,075,126 | ||||||
Pico Far East Holdings |
6,575,000 | 1,527,018 | ||||||
RLJ Entertainment 2 |
35,600 | 135,992 | ||||||
Television Broadcasts |
278,400 | 1,806,812 | ||||||
Wiley (John) & Sons Cl. A |
48,200 | 2,920,438 | ||||||
15,636,396 | ||||||||
Multiline Retail - 0.2% | ||||||||
Dollar Tree 2 |
8,450 | 460,187 | ||||||
New World Department Store China |
5,377,200 | 2,164,645 | ||||||
2,624,832 | ||||||||
Specialty Retail - 1.5% | ||||||||
Advance Auto Parts |
7,500 | 1,011,900 | ||||||
Aeropostale 2 |
10,000 | 34,900 | ||||||
224,100 | 3,832,110 | |||||||
Finish Line (The) Cl. A |
34,700 | 1,031,978 | ||||||
Genesco 2 |
39,500 | 3,244,135 | ||||||
I.T |
557,000 | 195,479 | ||||||
Lewis Group |
250,000 | 1,523,272 | ||||||
Oriental Watch Holdings |
543,000 | 127,511 | ||||||
Ross Stores |
4,730 | 312,795 | ||||||
Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores 2 |
10,400 | 223,288 | ||||||
Signet Jewelers |
10,000 | 1,105,900 | ||||||
Stein Mart |
167,800 | 2,330,742 | ||||||
Systemax 2 |
194,000 | 2,787,780 | ||||||
TravelCenters of America LLC 2 |
49,100 | 436,008 | ||||||
West Marine 2 |
131,100 | 1,345,086 | ||||||
Wet Seal (The) Cl. A 2 |
63,200 | 57,512 | ||||||
19,600,396 | ||||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods - 1.1% | ||||||||
Asia Brands |
117,100 | 136,027 | ||||||
Culp |
55,500 | 966,255 | ||||||
Daphne International Holdings |
3,912,800 | 1,534,748 | ||||||
Grendene |
200,000 | 1,250,057 | ||||||
Handsome |
5,700 | 155,767 | ||||||
Huvis Corporation |
15,000 | 169,006 | ||||||
J.G. Boswell Company 4 |
2,292 | 2,324,088 | ||||||
Movado Group |
57,081 | 2,378,565 | ||||||
Pacific Textiles Holdings |
750,000 | 941,564 | ||||||
Stella International Holdings |
400,000 | 1,088,976 | ||||||
Van de Velde |
22,500 | 1,196,940 | ||||||
Wolverine World Wide 1 |
95,000 | 2,475,700 | ||||||
14,617,693 | ||||||||
Total (Cost $111,207,330) | 148,099,412 | |||||||
Consumer Staples 1.6% | ||||||||
Beverages - 0.0% | ||||||||
11,876 | 107,359 | |||||||
Food & Staples Retailing - 0.1% | ||||||||
FamilyMart |
32,500 | 1,400,351 | ||||||
Food Products - 1.2% | ||||||||
Alico |
27,000 | 1,012,230 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 21 |
Royce Value Trust |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | |||||||
Consumer Staples (continued) | ||||||||
Food Products (continued) | ||||||||
Asian Plantations 2 |
50,000 | $ | 179,697 | |||||
Cal-Maine Foods |
21,948 | 1,631,175 | ||||||
Farmer Bros. 2 |
43,900 | 948,679 | ||||||
Industrias Bachoco ADR |
39,700 | 2,134,669 | ||||||
McLeod Russel India |
95,500 | 504,850 | ||||||
Seneca Foods Cl. A 2 |
163,474 | 5,002,305 | ||||||
Seneca Foods Cl. B 2 |
13,840 | 412,432 | ||||||
Sipef |
5,200 | 444,311 | ||||||
Tootsie Roll Industries |
124,135 | 3,654,534 | ||||||
598,676 | 227,497 | |||||||
16,152,379 | ||||||||
Personal Products - 0.3% | ||||||||
Nu Skin Enterprises Cl. A |
50,800 | 3,757,168 | ||||||
Total (Cost $17,355,001) | 21,417,257 | |||||||
Diversified Investment Companies 0.0% | ||||||||
Closed-End Funds - 0.0% | ||||||||
RIT Capital Partners |
13,500 | 304,047 | ||||||
Total (Cost $244,255) | 304,047 | |||||||
Energy 4.6% | ||||||||
Energy Equipment & Services - 3.5% | ||||||||
Cal Dive International 2 |
456,250 | 602,250 | ||||||
Helmerich & Payne |
34,000 | 3,947,740 | ||||||
ION Geophysical 2 |
361,500 | 1,525,530 | ||||||
Oceaneering International |
4,000 | 312,520 | ||||||
Oil States International 2 |
57,023 | 3,654,604 | ||||||
Pason Systems |
229,000 | 6,438,311 | ||||||
SEACOR Holdings 2 |
88,575 | 7,285,294 | ||||||
156,880 | 5,490,800 | |||||||
Superior Energy Services 1 |
18,000 | 650,520 | ||||||
TGS-NOPEC Geophysical |
141,100 | 4,510,986 | ||||||
Tidewater |
88,300 | 4,958,045 | ||||||
Trican Well Service |
65,200 | 1,052,805 | ||||||
Unit Corporation 2 |
77,000 | 5,299,910 | ||||||
45,729,315 | ||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels - 1.1% | ||||||||
Cimarex Energy |
61,300 | 8,794,098 | ||||||
Contango Oil & Gas 2 |
7,000 | 296,170 | ||||||
Hallador Energy |
38,000 | 360,620 | ||||||
Harvest Natural Resources 2 |
13,000 | 64,870 | ||||||
243,134 | 2,100,678 | |||||||
World Fuel Services |
9,700 | 477,531 | ||||||
WPX Energy 2 |
110,000 | 2,630,100 | ||||||
14,724,067 | ||||||||
Total (Cost $46,196,643) | 60,453,382 | |||||||
Financials 13.7% | ||||||||
Banks - 1.8% | ||||||||
Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son |
1,784,161 | 3,550,480 | ||||||
BCB Holdings 2 |
209,426 | 47,490 | ||||||
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach 4 |
1,200 | 6,933,600 | ||||||
Fauquier Bankshares |
160,800 | 2,563,152 | ||||||
First Citizens BancShares Cl. A |
30,527 | 7,479,115 | ||||||
Mechanics Bank 4 |
200 | 3,042,000 | ||||||
23,615,837 | ||||||||
Capital Markets - 6.0% | ||||||||
Affiliated Managers Group 2 |
34,700 | 7,127,380 | ||||||
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. 1 |
142,000 | 3,674,960 | ||||||
Artisan Partners Asset Management Cl. A |
51,300 | 2,907,684 | ||||||
ASA Gold and Precious Metals |
188,601 | 2,763,005 | ||||||
Ashmore Group |
681,000 | 4,312,214 | ||||||
Aurelius |
9,300 | 339,756 | ||||||
CETIP - Mercados Organizados |
430,000 | 6,120,615 | ||||||
Citadel Capital 2 |
1,000,000 | 527,269 | ||||||
Cowen Group 2 |
801,158 | 3,380,887 | ||||||
81,000 | 3,060,990 | |||||||
Federated Investors Cl. B 1 |
369,400 | 11,421,848 | ||||||
GAMCO Investors Cl. A |
28,900 | 2,400,145 | ||||||
Jupiter Fund Management |
230,000 | 1,572,520 | ||||||
Lazard Cl. A |
110,100 | 5,676,756 | ||||||
MVC Capital |
274,200 | 3,550,890 | ||||||
Paris Orleans |
33,513 | 789,297 | ||||||
RHJ International 2 |
565,000 | 2,751,890 | ||||||
SEI Investments |
233,500 | 7,651,795 | ||||||
Sprott |
590,000 | 1,675,367 | ||||||
U.S. Global Investors Cl. A |
661,751 | 2,329,364 | ||||||
Value Partners Group |
5,103,000 | 3,417,187 | ||||||
Westwood Holdings Group |
23,460 | 1,408,538 | ||||||
78,860,357 | ||||||||
Consumer Finance - 0.1% | ||||||||
EZCORP Cl. A 2 |
147,200 | 1,700,160 | ||||||
Diversified Financial Services - 1.1% | ||||||||
Banca Finnat Euramerica |
1,060,000 | 675,944 | ||||||
HF2 Financial Management Cl. A 2 |
292,300 | 3,010,690 | ||||||
MarketAxess Holdings |
100,000 | 5,406,000 | ||||||
PICO Holdings 2 |
100,400 | 2,385,504 | ||||||
Sofina |
19,000 | 2,207,778 | ||||||
13,685,916 | ||||||||
Insurance - 2.3% | ||||||||
Alleghany Corporation 2 |
6,499 | 2,847,342 | ||||||
E-L Financial |
16,500 | 10,839,698 | ||||||
Erie Indemnity Cl. A 1 |
50,000 | 3,763,000 | ||||||
Greenlight Capital Re Cl. A 2 |
21,061 | 693,749 | ||||||
Independence Holding Company |
349,423 | 4,937,347 | ||||||
Lancashire Holdings |
100,000 | 1,119,256 | ||||||
Platinum Underwriters Holdings |
44,000 | 2,853,400 | ||||||
Primerica |
78,000 | 3,732,300 | ||||||
30,786,092 | ||||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) - 0.0% | ||||||||
BRT Realty Trust 2 |
1,650 | 12,177 | ||||||
Real Estate Management & Development - 2.0% | ||||||||
Brasil Brokers Participacoes |
91,400 | 145,197 | ||||||
Consolidated-Tomoka Land |
60,564 | 2,779,888 | ||||||
E-House (China) Holdings ADR |
119,200 | 1,031,080 | ||||||
102,000 | 1,947,180 |
22 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
June 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
SHARES | VALUE | |||||||
Financials (continued) | ||||||||
Real Estate Management & Development (continued) | ||||||||
Hopefluent Group Holdings |
850,000 | $ | 245,665 | |||||
Jones Lang LaSalle |
4,910 | 620,575 | ||||||
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings |
98,200 | 2,633,724 | ||||||
Midland Holdings 2 |
2,500,000 | 1,257,999 | ||||||
167,000 | 4,246,810 | |||||||
Tejon Ranch 2 |
342,600 | 11,028,294 | ||||||
Tejon Ranch (Warrants) 2 |
52,082 | 152,600 | ||||||
26,089,012 | ||||||||
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance - 0.4% | ||||||||
PennyMac Financial Services Cl. A 2 |
50,000 | 759,500 | ||||||
Timberland Bancorp 5 |
444,200 | 4,681,868 | ||||||
Vestin Realty Mortgage II 2 |
53,557 | 224,939 | ||||||
5,666,307 | ||||||||
Total (Cost $146,477,380) | 180,415,858 | |||||||
Health Care 5.3% | ||||||||
Biotechnology - 0.6% | ||||||||
Amicus Therapeutics 2 |
92,300 | 308,282 | ||||||
ARIAD Pharmaceuticals 2 |
185,250 | 1,180,043 | ||||||
ArQule 2 |
130,000 | 201,500 | ||||||
Coronado Biosciences 2 |
170,000 | 292,400 | ||||||
Genomic Health 2 |
33,000 | 904,200 | ||||||
Green Cross |
7,500 | 919,154 | ||||||
84,108 | 3,273,483 | |||||||
Rigel Pharmaceuticals 2 |
63,000 | 228,690 | ||||||
Synthetic Biologics 2 |
50,000 | 86,000 | ||||||
58,000 | 233,740 | |||||||
7,627,492 | ||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies - 2.1% | ||||||||
Allied Healthcare Products 2 |
140,225 | 337,942 | ||||||
Analogic Corporation |
42,435 | 3,320,114 | ||||||
69,073 | 1,127,962 | |||||||
Atrion Corporation |
16,235 | 5,292,610 | ||||||
bioMerieux |
8,500 | 915,994 | ||||||
CONMED Corporation |
81,500 | 3,598,225 | ||||||
DENTSPLY International |
21,618 | 1,023,612 | ||||||
Derma Sciences 2 |
25,000 | 289,000 | ||||||
DiaSorin |
25,000 | 1,047,515 | ||||||
67,311 | 8,990,730 | |||||||
Invacare Corporation |
73,400 | 1,348,358 | ||||||
278,690 | 863,939 | |||||||
142,648 | 24,250 | |||||||
28,180,251 | ||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services - 0.4% | ||||||||
16,200 | 489,564 | |||||||
Landauer 1 |
75,500 | 3,171,000 | ||||||
10,000 | 1,419,900 | |||||||
5,080,464 | ||||||||
Health Care Technology - 0.1% | ||||||||
Medidata Solutions 2 |
40,000 | 1,712,400 | ||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services - 1.3% | ||||||||
Bio-Rad Laboratories Cl. A 2 |
22,388 | 2,680,067 | ||||||
PAREXEL International 2 |
165,800 | 8,760,872 | ||||||
PerkinElmer 1 |
39,000 | 1,826,760 | ||||||
Techne Corporation |
37,843 | 3,503,127 | ||||||
16,770,826 | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals - 0.8% | ||||||||
Adcock Ingram Holdings 2 |
28,300 | 141,407 | ||||||
Biodel 2 |
20,100 | 43,416 | ||||||
Boiron |
10,500 | 913,125 | ||||||
Medicines Company (The) 2 |
125,808 | 3,655,981 | ||||||
Recordati |
50,000 | 840,750 | ||||||
Santen Pharmaceutical |
20,000 | 1,125,315 | ||||||
Stallergenes |
18,000 | 1,387,402 | ||||||
Vetoquinol |
25,000 | 1,238,532 | ||||||
Virbac |
4,500 | 1,039,504 | ||||||
10,385,432 | ||||||||
Total (Cost $40,807,166) | 69,756,865 | |||||||
Industrials 29.3% | ||||||||
Aerospace & Defense - 2.1% | ||||||||
Cubic Corporation |
16,354 | 727,916 | ||||||
Curtiss-Wright |
7,250 | 475,310 | ||||||
Ducommun 2 |
117,200 | 3,062,436 | ||||||
HEICO Corporation |
262,938 | 13,657,000 | ||||||
HEICO Corporation Cl. A |
80,808 | 3,280,805 | ||||||
Hexcel Corporation 2 |
47,500 | 1,942,750 | ||||||
Magellan Aerospace |
118,600 | 1,309,318 | ||||||
Moog Cl. A 2 |
25,000 | 1,822,250 | ||||||
Teledyne Technologies 2 |
20,600 | 2,001,702 | ||||||
28,279,487 | ||||||||
Air Freight & Logistics - 2.4% | ||||||||
Expeditors International of Washington |
158,900 | 7,017,024 | ||||||
Forward Air |
209,750 | 10,036,538 | ||||||
149,400 | 7,529,760 | |||||||
UTi Worldwide 2 |
635,400 | 6,570,036 | ||||||
31,153,358 | ||||||||
Building Products - 1.1% | ||||||||
American Woodmark 2 |
117,135 | 3,733,093 | ||||||
Burnham Holdings Cl. B 4 |
36,000 | 655,200 | ||||||
Simpson Manufacturing |
275,300 | 10,009,908 | ||||||
14,398,201 | ||||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies - 2.7% | ||||||||
Brady Corporation Cl. A |
95,900 | 2,864,533 | ||||||
Brinks Company (The) |
206,320 | 5,822,350 | ||||||
CompX International Cl. A |
211,100 | 2,205,995 | ||||||
Copart 2 |
178,360 | 6,413,825 | ||||||
Heritage-Crystal Clean 2 |
88,241 | 1,732,171 | ||||||
Kaba Holding |
2,500 | 1,236,186 | ||||||
Kimball International Cl. B |
286,180 | 4,784,930 | ||||||
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers |
400,384 | 9,869,466 | ||||||
UniFirst Corporation |
2,700 | 286,200 | ||||||
35,215,656 | ||||||||
Construction & Engineering - 1.6% | ||||||||
EMCOR Group |
149,400 | 6,652,782 | ||||||
Integrated Electrical Services 2 |
351,960 | 2,301,818 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 23 |
Royce Value Trust | ||
Schedule of Investments | ||
SHARES | VALUE | |||||||
Industrials (continued) | ||||||||
Construction & Engineering (continued) | ||||||||
81,400 | $ | 4,336,992 | ||||||
KBR |
347,900 | 8,297,415 | ||||||
21,589,007 | ||||||||
Electrical Equipment - 3.0% | ||||||||
Elektrobudowa |
17,500 | 502,947 | ||||||
EnerSys |
47,200 | 3,246,888 | ||||||
Franklin Electric |
209,200 | 8,437,036 | ||||||
Global Power Equipment Group |
217,484 | 3,514,541 | ||||||
GrafTech International 2 |
344,838 | 3,607,006 | ||||||
Powell Industries |
101,700 | 6,649,146 | ||||||
Preformed Line Products |
91,600 | 4,930,828 | ||||||
Regal-Beloit |
100,000 | 7,856,000 | ||||||
Vicor 2 |
78,000 | 653,640 | ||||||
39,398,032 | ||||||||
Industrial Conglomerates - 0.7% | ||||||||
Carlisle Companies 1 |
32,200 | 2,789,164 | ||||||
Raven Industries |
192,400 | 6,376,136 | ||||||
9,165,300 | ||||||||
Machinery - 9.8% | ||||||||
AGCO Corporation |
7,800 | 438,516 | ||||||
Astec Industries |
10,800 | 473,904 | ||||||
Burckhardt Compression Holding |
8,400 | 4,527,740 | ||||||
CB Industrial Product Holding |
116,200 | 158,504 | ||||||
Chen Hsong Holdings |
1,159,000 | 333,476 | ||||||
CIRCOR International |
53,900 | 4,157,307 | ||||||
CLARCOR 1 |
92,500 | 5,721,125 | ||||||
Columbus McKinnon |
86,800 | 2,347,940 | ||||||
Donaldson Company |
199,959 | 8,462,265 | ||||||
Graco |
116,376 | 9,086,638 | ||||||
Hurco Companies |
25,952 | 731,846 | ||||||
IDEX Corporation |
67,400 | 5,441,876 | ||||||
John Bean Technologies |
155,536 | 4,820,061 | ||||||
Kennametal |
197,300 | 9,131,044 | ||||||
Lincoln Electric Holdings |
46,360 | 3,239,637 | ||||||
Lindsay Corporation |
25,000 | 2,111,750 | ||||||
Middleby Corporation 2 |
58,500 | 4,839,120 | ||||||
Mueller Industries |
17,000 | 499,970 | ||||||
Mueller Water Products Cl. A |
35,900 | 310,176 | ||||||
NN |
197,100 | 5,041,818 | ||||||
Nordson Corporation |
24,296 | 1,948,296 | ||||||
Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology |
5,000 | 551,349 | ||||||
PMFG 2 |
388,352 | 2,046,615 | ||||||
Rational |
2,000 | 646,447 | ||||||
RBC Bearings |
47,000 | 3,010,350 | ||||||
Rotork |
20,000 | 913,887 | ||||||
Sarine Technologies |
311,300 | 641,624 | ||||||
Semperit AG Holding |
39,540 | 2,422,860 | ||||||
Spirax-Sarco Engineering |
19,000 | 888,679 | ||||||
Tecumseh Products 2 |
32,800 | 166,952 | ||||||
Tennant Company |
41,900 | 3,197,808 | ||||||
Timken Company (The) |
42,800 | 2,903,552 | ||||||
Valmont Industries |
65,700 | 9,983,115 | ||||||
WABCO Holdings 2 |
93,400 | 9,976,988 | ||||||
Wabtec Corporation |
84,550 | 6,982,984 | ||||||
Woodward |
208,400 | 10,457,512 | ||||||
128,613,731 | ||||||||
Marine - 0.4% | ||||||||
50,100 | 5,868,714 | |||||||
Professional Services - 3.5% | ||||||||
Acacia Research |
55,341 | 982,303 | ||||||
150,277 | 7,784,349 | |||||||
CRA International 2 |
18,638 | 429,606 | ||||||
Exponent |
12,700 | 941,197 | ||||||
Heidrick & Struggles International |
223,731 | 4,139,023 | ||||||
Huron Consulting Group 2 |
3,816 | 270,249 | ||||||
ICF International 2 |
65,821 | 2,327,431 | ||||||
ManpowerGroup |
91,158 | 7,734,756 | ||||||
On Assignment 2 |
350,400 | 12,463,728 | ||||||
Robert Half International |
33,772 | 1,612,275 | ||||||
RPX Corporation 2 |
30,500 | 541,375 | ||||||
Towers Watson & Co. Cl. A |
69,200 | 7,212,716 | ||||||
TrueBlue 2 |
6,660 | 183,616 | ||||||
46,622,624 | ||||||||
Road & Rail - 1.2% | ||||||||
Landstar System 1 |
99,400 | 6,361,600 | ||||||
Patriot Transportation Holding 2 |
212,958 | 7,447,141 | ||||||
Trancom |
8,000 | 314,299 | ||||||
Universal Truckload Services |
78,916 | 2,001,310 | ||||||
16,124,350 | ||||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors - 0.7% | ||||||||
Aceto Corporation |
52,100 | 945,094 | ||||||
Kloeckner & Co 2 |
20,300 | 306,043 | ||||||
MISUMI Group |
25,000 | 687,774 | ||||||
MSC Industrial Direct Cl. A 1 |
71,508 | 6,839,025 | ||||||
8,777,936 | ||||||||
Transportation Infrastructure - 0.1% | ||||||||
Wesco Aircraft Holdings 2 |
68,400 | 1,365,264 | ||||||
Total (Cost $205,692,668) | 386,571,660 | |||||||
Information Technology 18.9% | ||||||||
Communications Equipment - 0.8% | ||||||||
ADTRAN 1 |
339,373 | 7,656,255 | ||||||
Bel Fuse Cl. B |
28,126 | 721,994 | ||||||
Comba Telecom Systems Holdings 2 |
1,041,000 | 333,103 | ||||||
Comtech Telecommunications 1 |
30,000 | 1,119,900 | ||||||
Ellies Holdings 2 |
415,300 | 144,486 | ||||||
EVS Broadcast Equipment |
15,000 | 745,173 | ||||||
Plantronics |
2,111 | 101,434 | ||||||
Sonus Networks 2 |
74,000 | 265,660 | ||||||
11,088,005 | ||||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components - 8.2% | ||||||||
Agilysys 2 |
165,125 | 2,324,960 | ||||||
Anixter International 1 |
61,795 | 6,183,826 | ||||||
Avnet |
16,400 | 726,684 | ||||||
AVX Corporation |
57,300 | 760,944 | ||||||
156,900 | 3,997,812 | |||||||
Cognex Corporation 2 |
139,600 | 5,360,640 |
24 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | ||
SHARES | VALUE | |||||||
Information Technology (continued) | ||||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components (continued) | ||||||||
Coherent 2 |
152,916 | $ | 10,118,452 | |||||
66,700 | 2,881,440 | |||||||
Domino Printing Sciences |
90,000 | 924,156 | ||||||
DTS 2 |
207,000 | 3,810,870 | ||||||
FEI Company |
88,900 | 8,065,897 | ||||||
FLIR Systems |
262,600 | 9,120,098 | ||||||
Hollysys Automation Technologies 2 |
49,482 | 1,211,814 | ||||||
72,920 | 5,016,896 | |||||||
Maxwell Technologies 2 |
24,977 | 377,902 | ||||||
National Instruments |
251,850 | 8,157,421 | ||||||
Newport Corporation 2 |
523,500 | 9,684,750 | ||||||
Perceptron |
357,700 | 4,560,675 | ||||||
Plexus Corporation 2 |
176,100 | 7,623,369 | ||||||
Richardson Electronics |
479,832 | 5,023,841 | ||||||
Rofin-Sinar Technologies 2 |
243,281 | 5,848,475 | ||||||
Rogers Corporation 2 |
31,666 | 2,101,039 | ||||||
211,400 | 1,733,480 | |||||||
Vaisala Cl. A |
30,320 | 994,337 | ||||||
Vishay Precision Group 2 |
74,826 | 1,231,636 | ||||||
107,841,414 | ||||||||
Internet Software & Services - 1.0% | ||||||||
Conversant 2 |
137,800 | 3,500,120 | ||||||
j2 Global |
31,000 | 1,576,660 | ||||||
Move 2 |
44,200 | 653,718 | ||||||
QuinStreet 2 |
532,215 | 2,932,505 | ||||||
RealNetworks 2 |
183,750 | 1,402,013 | ||||||
Spark Networks 2 |
27,400 | 155,358 | ||||||
Support.com 2 |
338,499 | 917,332 | ||||||
Trulia 2 |
10,000 | 473,800 | ||||||
United Online 2 |
24,571 | 255,538 | ||||||
24,000 | 971,040 | |||||||
12,838,084 | ||||||||
IT Services - 3.0% | ||||||||
Computer Task Group |
75,000 | 1,234,500 | ||||||
Convergys Corporation |
121,000 | 2,594,240 | ||||||
eClerx Services |
66,400 | 1,282,846 | ||||||
Euronet Worldwide 2 |
15,000 | 723,600 | ||||||
Fiserv 2 |
9,080 | 547,706 | ||||||
Hackett Group (The) |
1,336,596 | 7,979,478 | ||||||
Innodata 2 |
171,501 | 552,233 | ||||||
ManTech International Cl. A |
35,400 | 1,045,008 | ||||||
MAXIMUS |
179,000 | 7,700,580 | ||||||
Metrofile Holdings |
1,661,228 | 749,778 | ||||||
NeuStar Cl. A 2 |
29,287 | 762,048 | ||||||
Sapient Corporation 2 |
553,102 | 8,987,907 | ||||||
Sykes Enterprises 2 |
134,824 | 2,929,726 | ||||||
Teradata Corporation 2 |
6,400 | 257,280 | ||||||
Unisys Corporation 2 |
94,000 | 2,325,560 | ||||||
39,672,490 | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment - 3.2% |
||||||||
311,000 | 3,803,530 | |||||||
Brooks Automation |
166,200 | 1,789,974 | ||||||
Cabot Microelectronics 2 |
21,809 | 973,772 | ||||||
CEVA 2 |
38,000 | 561,260 | ||||||
Diodes 2 |
230,950 | 6,688,312 | ||||||
Entropic Communications 2 |
105,000 | 349,650 | ||||||
Exar Corporation 2 |
157,576 | 1,780,609 | ||||||
Integrated Silicon Solution 2 |
135,900 | 2,007,243 | ||||||
International Rectifier 2 |
95,000 | 2,650,500 | ||||||
Kopin Corporation 2 |
162,200 | 528,772 | ||||||
Lam Research |
7,500 | 506,850 | ||||||
Microsemi Corporation 2 |
25,000 | 669,000 | ||||||
Miraial |
48,900 | 888,169 | ||||||
MKS Instruments |
137,000 | 4,279,880 | ||||||
Nanometrics 2 |
132,000 | 2,409,000 | ||||||
Power Integrations 1 |
49,000 | 2,819,460 | ||||||
Regent Manner International Holdings |
750,000 | 163,540 | ||||||
Skyworks Solutions |
12,800 | 601,088 | ||||||
STR Holdings 2 |
90,000 | 121,500 | ||||||
Teradyne 1 |
228,000 | 4,468,800 | ||||||
Tessera Technologies |
44,000 | 971,520 | ||||||
100,500 | 3,744,630 | |||||||
42,777,059 | ||||||||
Software - 1.6% | ||||||||
American Software Cl. A |
204,990 | 2,025,301 | ||||||
95,000 | 7,202,900 | |||||||
Aspen Technology 2 |
42,100 | 1,953,440 | ||||||
Aware 2 |
12,800 | 83,968 | ||||||
Blackbaud 1 |
31,400 | 1,122,236 | ||||||
Computer Modelling Group |
10,000 | 277,588 | ||||||
Envivio 2 |
238,000 | 571,200 | ||||||
ePlus 2 |
18,300 | 1,065,060 | ||||||
Mentor Graphics |
16,753 | 361,362 | ||||||
MICROS Systems 2 |
19,500 | 1,324,050 | ||||||
SeaChange International 2 |
440,391 | 3,527,532 | ||||||
SimCorp |
18,000 | 619,852 | ||||||
TeleNav 2 |
48,797 | 277,655 | ||||||
20,412,144 | ||||||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals - 1.1% | ||||||||
BlackBerry 2 |
8,000 | 81,920 | ||||||
Diebold |
249,100 | 10,006,347 | ||||||
Intevac 2 |
188,800 | 1,512,288 | ||||||
Silicon Graphics International 2 |
115,400 | 1,110,148 | ||||||
Western Digital 1 |
17,690 | 1,632,787 | ||||||
14,343,490 | ||||||||
Total (Cost $174,653,931) | 248,972,686 | |||||||
Materials 7.5% | ||||||||
Chemicals - 2.2% | ||||||||
84,609 | 4,906,476 | |||||||
Fufeng Group |
341,300 | 128,146 | ||||||
Hawkins |
86,178 | 3,200,651 | ||||||
Innospec |
101,083 | 4,363,753 | ||||||
140,000 | 2,346,400 | |||||||
KMG Chemicals |
71,700 | 1,289,166 | ||||||
Minerals Technologies 1 |
58,223 | 3,818,264 | ||||||
OM Group |
45,000 | 1,459,350 | ||||||
Quaker Chemical |
32,779 | 2,517,100 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 25 |
Royce Value Trust |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | |||||||
Materials (continued) | ||||||||
Chemicals (continued) | ||||||||
Rockwood Holdings |
39,100 | $ | 2,971,209 | |||||
Sensient Technologies |
11,993 | 668,250 | ||||||
Stepan Company |
5,800 | 306,588 | ||||||
Valspar Corporation (The) |
1,200 | 91,428 | ||||||
Westlake Chemical |
11,740 | 983,342 | ||||||
29,050,123 | ||||||||
Construction Materials - 1.0% | ||||||||
Ash Grove Cement Cl. B 4 |
50,518 | 11,619,140 | ||||||
Mardin Cimento Sanayii |
491,700 | 1,183,645 | ||||||
12,802,785 | ||||||||
Containers & Packaging - 0.8% | ||||||||
Greif Cl. A |
112,344 | 6,129,489 | ||||||
Mayr-Melnhof Karton |
38,000 | 4,527,427 | ||||||
10,656,916 | ||||||||
Metals & Mining - 3.3% | ||||||||
AuRico Gold |
132,000 | 562,320 | ||||||
Central Steel & Wire 4 |
4,862 | 3,622,190 | ||||||
Exeter Resource 2 |
475,000 | 337,250 | ||||||
Fresnillo |
22,500 | 335,777 | ||||||
Globe Specialty Metals |
20,000 | 415,600 | ||||||
Grupo SIMEC Ser. B 2 |
35,100 | 162,683 | ||||||
Hecla Mining |
960,000 | 3,312,000 | ||||||
IAMGOLD Corporation 2 |
510,000 | 2,101,200 | ||||||
Imdex 2 |
1,391,766 | 826,790 | ||||||
Kinross Gold 2 |
24,600 | 101,844 | ||||||
Kirkland Lake Gold 2 |
90,000 | 299,424 | ||||||
Maharashtra Seamless |
250,000 | 1,293,333 | ||||||
Major Drilling Group International |
168,000 | 1,223,335 | ||||||
Medusa Mining 2 |
75,600 | 131,524 | ||||||
Pan American Silver |
225,430 | 3,460,350 | ||||||
Pretium Resources 2 |
196,000 | 1,621,930 | ||||||
Reliance Steel & Aluminum |
154,420 | 11,382,298 | ||||||
Saracen Mineral Holdings 2 |
237,072 | 91,654 | ||||||
Schnitzer Steel Industries Cl. A 1 |
100,000 | 2,607,000 | ||||||
Sims Metal Management 2 |
16,000 | 146,044 | ||||||
Synalloy Corporation |
178,800 | 2,935,896 | ||||||
Victoria Gold 2 |
550,000 | 69,584 | ||||||
Vista Gold 2 |
124,000 | 62,000 | ||||||
Worthington Industries |
148,000 | 6,369,920 | ||||||
43,471,946 | ||||||||
Paper & Forest Products - 0.2% | ||||||||
Glatfelter |
28,400 | 753,452 | ||||||
3,296,000 | 42,527 | |||||||
Schweitzer-Mauduit International |
33,718 | 1,472,128 | ||||||
2,268,107 | ||||||||
Total (Cost $73,975,880) | 98,249,877 | |||||||
Telecommunication Services 0.7% | ||||||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services - 0.7% | ||||||||
Telephone and Data Systems |
338,270 | 8,832,230 | ||||||
USA Mobility |
28,300 | 435,820 | ||||||
Total (Cost $8,707,596) | 9,268,050 | |||||||
Utilities 0.1% | ||||||||
Gas Utilities - 0.1% | ||||||||
UGI Corporation |
15,500 | 782,750 | ||||||
Total (Cost $583,805) | 782,750 | |||||||
Miscellaneous 7 4.8% | ||||||||
Total (Cost $59,657,804) | 63,035,627 | |||||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | ||||||||
(Cost $885,559,459) |
1,287,327,471 | |||||||
PREFERRED STOCK 0.1% | ||||||||
(Cost $724,062) |
50,000 | 1,377,000 | ||||||
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT 6.0% | ||||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, | ||||||||
0.00% dated 6/30/14, due 7/1/14, |
||||||||
maturity value $78,623,000 (collateralized |
||||||||
by obligations of various U.S. Government |
||||||||
Agencies, 2.00% due 9/30/20, valued at |
||||||||
$80,198,125) |
||||||||
(Cost $78,623,000) |
78,623,000 | |||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 103.8% | ||||||||
(Cost $964,906,521) |
1,367,327,471 | |||||||
LIABILITIES LESS CASH | ||||||||
AND OTHER ASSETS (3.8)% |
(49,862,940 | ) | ||||||
NET ASSETS 100.0% | $ | 1,317,464,531 | ||||||
26 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
June 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 27 |
Royce Value Trust | June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
ASSETS: | |||||
Investments at value | |||||
Non-Affiliated Companies (cost $878,099,796) |
$ | 1,281,309,813 | |||
Affiliated Companies (cost $8,183,725) |
7,394,658 | ||||
Total investments at value | 1,288,704,471 | ||||
Repurchase agreements (at cost and value) | 78,623,000 | ||||
Cash and foreign currency | 5,080,620 | ||||
Receivable for investments sold | 3,105,568 | ||||
Receivable for dividends and interest | 755,213 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 501,371 | ||||
Total Assets |
1,376,770,243 | ||||
LIABILITIES: | |||||
Revolving credit agreement | 45,000,000 | ||||
Payable for investments purchased | 13,402,640 | ||||
Payable for investment advisory fee | 468,151 | ||||
Payable for interest expense | 5,923 | ||||
Accrued expenses | 274,191 | ||||
Deferred capital gains tax | 154,807 | ||||
Total Liabilities |
59,305,712 | ||||
Net Assets |
$ | 1,317,464,531 | |||
ANALYSIS OF NET ASSETS: | |||||
Paid-in capital - $0.001 par value per share; 73,209,898 shares outstanding (150,000,000 shares authorized) | $ | 849,652,899 | |||
Undistributed net investment income (loss) | 10,361,803 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 100,011,276 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency | 402,270,557 | ||||
Quarterly distributions | (44,832,004 | ) | |||
Net Assets (net asset value per share - $18.00) |
$ | 1,317,464,531 | |||
Investments at identified cost |
$ | 886,283,521 | |||
28 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Value Trust | Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | |
Statement of Operations | ||
INVESTMENT INCOME: | |||||
Income: | |||||
Dividends |
|||||
Non-Affiliated Companies |
$ | 7,989,091 | |||
Affiliated Companies |
35,536 | ||||
Foreign withholding tax |
(298,413 | ) | |||
Rehypothecation income |
159,190 | ||||
Total income | 7,885,404 | ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Investment advisory fees |
2,929,462 | ||||
Interest expense |
430,429 | ||||
Stockholder reports |
233,523 | ||||
Custody and transfer agent fees |
140,507 | ||||
Directors fees |
78,527 | ||||
Administrative and office facilities |
68,039 | ||||
Professional fees |
34,630 | ||||
Other expenses |
62,426 | ||||
Total expenses | 3,977,543 | ||||
Compensating balance credits | (153 | ) | |||
Net expenses | 3,977,390 | ||||
Net investment income (loss) | 3,908,014 | ||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND FOREIGN CURRENCY: | |||||
Net realized gain (loss): | |||||
Investments |
65,782,568 | ||||
Foreign currency transactions |
(148,329 | ) | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation): | |||||
Investments and foreign currency translations |
(34,399,364 | ) | |||
Other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency |
(155,924 | ) | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 31,078,951 | ||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS | $ | 34,986,965 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 29 |
Royce Value Trust |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
Six months ended | |||||||||
6/30/14 | Year ended | ||||||||
(unaudited) | 12/31/13 | ||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | |||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | $ | 3,908,014 | $ | 8,567,535 | |||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 65,634,239 | 171,436,021 | |||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency | (34,555,288 | ) | 191,177,592 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from investment operations | 34,986,965 | 371,181,148 | |||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS: | |||||||||
Net investment income | | (7,723,525 | ) | ||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency | | (148,307,278 | ) | ||||||
Quarterly distributions1 | (44,832,004 | ) | | ||||||
Total distributions | (44,832,004 | ) | (156,030,803 | ) | |||||
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: | |||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 19,480,281 | 26,224,892 | |||||||
Depreciation of securities contributed to Royce Global Value Trust spinoff | | (15,972,444 | ) | ||||||
Total capital stock transactions | 19,480,281 | 10,252,448 | |||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS | 9,635,242 | 225,402,793 | |||||||
NET ASSETS: | |||||||||
Beginning of period |
1,307,829,289 | 1,082,426,496 | |||||||
End of period (including undistributed net investment income (loss) of $10,361,803 at 6/30/14 and $6,453,789 at 12/31/13) |
$ | 1,317,464,531 | $ | 1,307,829,289 |
1 | To be allocated to net investment income, net realized gains and/or return of capital at year end. |
30 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Value Trust |
Statement of Cash Flows |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from investment operations | $ | 34,986,965 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||
Purchases of long-term investments |
(276,197,697 | ) | |||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of long-term investments |
253,920,405 | ||||
Net purchases, sales and maturities of short-term investments |
113,286,000 | ||||
Net (increase) decrease in dividends and interest receivable and other assets |
848,639 | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in interest expense payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
(195,179 | ) | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
34,399,364 | ||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
(65,634,239 | ) | |||
Cash provided by operating activities | 95,414,258 | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in revolving credit agreement | (65,000,000 | ) | |||
Distributions | (44,832,004 | ) | |||
Reinvestment of distributions | 19,480,281 | ||||
Cash used for financing activities | (90,351,723 | ) | |||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH: | 5,062,535 | ||||
Cash and foreign currency at beginning of period |
18,085 | ||||
Cash and foreign currency at end of period |
$ | 5,080,620 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 31 |
Royce Value Trust |
Financial Highlights |
This table is presented to show selected data for a share of Common Stock outstanding throughout each period, and to assist stockholders in evaluating the Funds performance for the periods presented.
Six months ended | Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | $ | 18.17 | $ | 15.40 | $ | 14.18 | $ | 16.73 | $ | 12.87 | $ | 9.37 | |||||||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
0.05 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.17 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency |
0.44 | 4.89 | 2.02 | (1.62 | ) | 3.85 | 3.87 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total investment operations |
0.49 | 5.01 | 2.25 | (1.52 | ) | 4.09 | 4.04 | ||||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
| | (0.04 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.20 | ) | (0.18 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
| | (0.13 | ) | (0.16 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Return of capital |
| | | | | (0.02 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to preferred stockholders |
| | (0.17 | ) | (0.19 | ) | (0.20 | ) | (0.20 | ) | |||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
0.49 | 5.01 | 2.08 | (1.71 | ) | 3.89 | 3.84 | ||||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
| (0.11 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.03 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
| (2.08 | ) | (0.63 | ) | (0.43 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||
Return of capital |
| | | (0.27 | ) | | (0.32 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Quarterly distributions1 |
(0.62 | ) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to common stockholders |
(0.62 | ) | (2.19 | ) | (0.80 | ) | (0.78 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.32 | ) | |||||||||||||
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of reinvestment of distributions by Common Stockholders |
(0.04 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.00 | ) | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total capital stock transactions |
(0.04 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.00 | ) | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 18.00 | $ | 18.17 | $ | 15.40 | $ | 14.18 | $ | 16.73 | $ | 12.87 | |||||||||||||
MARKET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 16.00 | $ | 16.01 | $ | 13.42 | $ | 12.27 | $ | 14.54 | $ | 10.79 | |||||||||||||
TOTAL RETURN:2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Market Value | 3.90 | %3 | 35.63 | % | 16.22 | % | (10.46 | )% | 35.05 | % | 35.39 | % | |||||||||||||
Net Asset Value | 3.00 | %3 | 34.14 | % | 15.41 | % | (10.06 | )% | 30.27 | % | 44.59 | % | |||||||||||||
RATIOS BASED ON AVERAGE NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment advisory fee expense4 |
0.46 | %5 | 0.54 | % | 0.56 | % | 0.86 | % | 0.11 | % | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
0.16 | %5 | 0.25 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.12 | % | 0.12 | % | 0.16 | % | |||||||||||||
Total expenses (net)6 | 0.62 | %5 | 0.79 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.98 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.16 | % | |||||||||||||
Expenses net of fee waivers and excluding interest expense | 0.56 | %5 | 0.65 | % | 0.68 | % | 0.98 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.16 | % | |||||||||||||
Expenses prior to fee waivers and balance credits | 0.62 | %5 | 0.79 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.98 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.16 | % | |||||||||||||
Expenses prior to fee waivers | 0.62 | %5 | 0.79 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.98 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.16 | % | |||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | 0.61 | %5 | 0.70 | % | 1.57 | % | 0.63 | % | 1.69 | % | 1.66 | % | |||||||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period (in thousands) |
$ | 1,317,465 | $ | 1,307,829 | $ | 1,082,426 | $ | 966,640 | $ | 1,105,879 | $ | 849,777 | |||||||||||||
Liquidation Value of Preferred Stock, End of Period (in thousands) |
$ | 220,000 | $ | 220,000 | $ | 220,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 20 | % | 33 | % | 25 | % | 26 | % | 30 | % | 31 | % | |||||||||||||
PREFERRED STOCK: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total shares outstanding | 8,800,000 | 8,800,000 | 8,800,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per share | $ | 134.88 | $ | 150.67 | $ | 121.57 | |||||||||||||||||||
Liquidation preference per share | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average month-end market value per share | $ | 25.37 | $ | 25.06 | $ | 23.18 | |||||||||||||||||||
REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage | 3028 | % | 1289 | % | 822 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per $1,000 | $ | 30,277 | $ | 12,889 | $ | 8,216 | |||||||||||||||||||
32 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Value Trust |
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Royce Value
Trust, Inc. (the Fund), is a diversified closed-end investment company that was
incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland on July 1, 1986. The Fund commenced
operations on November 26, 1986.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds investments, as noted above. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels below: |
|||
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. |
|||
Level 2 other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, foreign securities that may be fair valued and repurchase agreements). The table below includes all Level 2 securities. Level 2 securities with values based on quoted prices for similar securities are noted in the Schedule of Investments. |
|||
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs (including last trade price before trading was suspended, or at a discount thereto for lack of marketability or otherwise, market price information regarding other securities, information received from the company and/or published documents, including SEC filings and financial statements, or other publicly available information). |
|||
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. |
|||
The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the Funds investments as of June 30, 2014. For a detailed breakout of common stocks by sector classification, please refer to the Schedule of Investments. |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 1,253,133,220 | $ | 33,924,227 | $ | 270,024 | $ | 1,287,327,471 | ||||
Preferred Stocks | | | 1,377,000 | 1,377,000 | ||||||||
Cash Equivalents | | 78,623,000 | | 78,623,000 | ||||||||
Level 3 Reconciliation: |
Balance as of 12/31/13 | Sales | Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)1 |
Balance as of 6/30/14 | ||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 131,709 | $ | | $ | 138,315 | $ | 270,024 | |||||
Preferred Stocks | 1,578,555 | 72,406 | (129,149 | ) | 1,377,000 |
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 33 |
Royce Value Trust |
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued)
Repurchase Agreements:
The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements
with institutions that the Funds investment adviser has determined are creditworthy.
The Fund restricts repurchase agreements to maturities of no more than seven days.
Securities pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements, which are held until
maturity of the repurchase agreements, are marked-to-market daily and maintained
at a value at least equal to the principal amount of the repurchase agreement (including
accrued interest). Repurchase agreements could involve certain risks in the event
of default or insolvency of the counter-party, including possible delays or restrictions
upon the ability of the Fund to dispose of its underlying securities.
Foreign Currency:
Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses
arise from sales and maturities of short-term securities, sales of foreign currencies,
expiration of currency forward contracts, currency gains or losses realized between
the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between
the amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the
Funds books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received
or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in
the value of assets and liabilities, including investments in securities at the
end of the reporting period, as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates.
Taxes:
As a qualified regulated investment company
under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, the Fund is not subject to income
taxes to the extent that it distributes substantially all of its taxable income
for its fiscal year. The Schedule of Investments includes information regarding
income taxes under the caption Tax Information.
Capital Gains Taxes:
The Fund is subject to a tax imposed on
short-term capital gains on securities of issuers domiciled in certain countries.
The Fund records an estimated deferred tax liability for these securities that have
been held for less than one year. This amount, if any, is reported as deferred capital
gains tax in the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities, assuming those
positions were disposed of at the end of the period, and accounted for as a reduction
in the market value of the security.
Distributions:
The Fund pays quarterly distributions on
the Funds Common Stock at the annual rate of 7% of the rolling average of
the prior four calendar quarter-end NAVs of the Funds Common Stock, with the
fourth quarter distribution being the greater of 1.75% of the rolling average or
the distribution required by IRS regulations. The Board of Directors approved an
increase in the annual rate of distributions under its managed distribution policy
for Common Stockholders from 5% to 7%, effective for 2014. Prior to November 15,
2012, distributions to Preferred Stockholders were accrued daily and paid quarterly.
Distributions to Common Stockholders are recorded on ex-dividend date. Distributable
capital gains and/or net investment income were first allocated to Preferred Stockholder
distributions, with any excess allocable to Common Stockholders. If capital gains
and/or net investment income were allocated to both Preferred and Common Stockholders,
the tax character of such allocations was proportional. To the extent that distributions
are not paid from long-term capital gains, net investment income or net short-term
capital gains, they will represent a return of capital. Distributions are determined
in accordance with income tax regulations that may differ from accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Permanent book and tax differences
relating to stockholder distributions will result in reclassifications within the
capital accounts. Undistributed net investment income may include temporary book
and tax basis differences, which will reverse in a subsequent period. Any taxable
income or gain remaining undistributed at fiscal year end is distributed in the
following year.
On June 19, 2013, the Fund purchased 10,160
common shares of Royce Global Value Trust, Inc. (RGT) for $100,076.
On October 18, 2013, the Fund contributed $99,899,924 in cash and securities in
exchange for shares of RGT, and on the same date distributed all shares of RGT valued
at $100,000,000 to Fund stockholders of record as of October 10, 2013, at the rate
of one share of RGT for every seven shares of the Funds Common Stock outstanding.
In connection with the spinoff of RGT, the securities contributed included $15,972,444
in unrealized depreciation.
Investment Transactions and Related Investment
Income:
Investment transactions are accounted for
on the trade date. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Non-cash
dividend income is recorded at the fair market value of the securities received.
Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis. Premium and discounts on debt securities
are amortized using the effective yield-to-maturity method. Realized gains and losses
from investment transactions are determined on the basis of identified cost for
book and tax purposes.
Expenses:
The Fund incurs direct and indirect expenses.
Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged to the Funds operations,
while expenses applicable to more than one of the Royce Funds are allocated equitably.
Certain personnel, occupancy costs and other administrative expenses related to
the Royce Funds are allocated by Royce & Associates, LLC (Royce)
under an administration agreement and are included in administrative and office
facilities and professional fees. The Fund has adopted a deferred fee agreement
that allows the Directors to defer the receipt of all or a portion of directors fees otherwise payable. The deferred fees are invested in certain Royce Funds
until distributed in accordance with the agreement.
34 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Royce Value Trust |
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued)
Compensating Balance Credits:
The Fund has
an arrangement with its custodian bank, whereby a portion of the custodians
fee is paid indirectly by credits earned on the Funds cash on deposit with
the bank. This deposit arrangement is an alternative to purchasing overnight investments.
Conversely, the Fund pays interest to the custodian on any cash overdrafts, to the
extent they are not offset by credits earned on positive cash balances.
Capital Stock:
The Fund issued
1,235,634 and 1,699,025 shares of Common Stock as reinvestment of distributions
for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively.
Borrowings:
The Fund had
entered into a $150,000,000 revolving credit agreement (the credit agreement) with
BNP Paribas Prime Brokerage Inc. (BNPP) on November 14, 2012 and reduced this line
to $45,000,000 on June 26, 2014. The Fund pays a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum
on the unused portion of the credit agreement. The credit agreement has a 360-day
rolling term that resets daily; however, if the Fund exceeds certain net asset value
triggers, the credit agreement may convert to a 60-day rolling term that resets
daily. The Fund is required to pledge portfolio securities as collateral in an amount
up to two times the loan balance outstanding and has granted a security interest
in the securities pledged to, and in favor of, BNPP as security for the loan balance
outstanding. If the Fund fails to meet certain requirements, or maintain other financial
covenants required under the credit agreement, the Fund may be required to repay
immediately, in part or in full, the loan balance outstanding under the credit agreement
necessitating the sale of portfolio securities at potentially inopportune times.
The credit agreement also permits, subject to certain conditions, BNPP to rehypothecate
portfolio securities pledged by the Fund up to the amount of the loan balance outstanding.
The Fund continues to receive payments in lieu of dividends and interest on rehypothecated
securities. The Fund also has the right under the credit agreement to recall the
rehypothecated securities from BNPP on demand. If BNPP fails to deliver the recalled
security in a timely manner, the Fund will be compensated by BNPP for any fees or
losses related to the failed delivery or, in the event a recalled security will
not be returned by BNPP, the Fund, upon notice to BNPP, may reduce the loan balance
outstanding by the amount of the recalled security failed to be returned. The Fund
will receive a portion of the fees earned by BNPP in connection with the rehypothecation
of portfolio securities.
As of June 30, 2014, the Fund
has outstanding borrowings of $45,000,000. During the six months ended June 30,
2014, the Fund borrowed an average daily balance of $72,403,315 at a weighted average
borrowing cost of 1.18%. As of June 30, 2014, the aggregate value of rehypothecated
securities was $42,949,178. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Fund
earned $159,190 in fees from rehypothecated securities.
Investment Advisory Agreement:
As compensation for its services under the
Investment Advisory Agreement, Royce receives a fee comprised of a Basic Fee (Basic
Fee) and an adjustment to the Basic Fee based on the investment performance
of the Fund in relation to the investment record of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index
(S&P 600).
The Basic Fee is a monthly fee equal to
1/12 of 1% (1% on an annualized basis) of the average of the Funds month-end
net assets applicable to Common Stockholders, plus the liquidation value of outstanding
Preferred Stock, for the rolling 60-month period ending with such month (the performance
period). The Basic Fee for each month is increased or decreased at the rate of
1/12 of .05% for each percentage point that the investment performance of the Fund
exceeds, or is exceeded by, the percentage change in the investment record of the
S&P 600 for the performance period by more than two percentage points. The
performance period for each such month is a rolling 60-month period ending with
such month. The maximum increase or decrease in the Basic Fee for any month may
not exceed 1/12 of .5%. Accordingly, for each month, the maximum monthly fee rate
as adjusted for performance is 1/12 of 1.5% and is payable if the investment performance
of the Fund exceeds the percentage change in the investment record of the S&P
600 by 12 or more percentage points for the performance period, and the minimum
monthly fee rate as adjusted for performance is 1/12 of .5% and is payable if the
percentage change in the investment record of the S&P 600 exceeds the investment
performance of the Fund by 12 or more percentage points for the performance period.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Royce is
not entitled to receive any fee for any month when the investment performance of
the Fund for the rolling 36-month period ending with such month is negative. In
the event that the Funds investment performance for such a performance period
is less than zero, Royce will not be required to refund to the Fund any fee earned
in respect of any prior performance period.
For the six rolling 60-month periods ended
June 2014, the Funds investment performance ranged from 8% to 32% below the
investment performance of the S&P 600. Accordingly, the net investment advisory
fee consisted of a Basic Fee of $5,500,946 and a net downward adjustment of $2,571,484
for the performance of the Fund relative to that of the S&P 600. For the six
months ended June 30, 2014, the Fund accrued and paid Royce investment advisory
fees totaling $2,929,462.
Purchases and Sales of Investment Securities:
For the six months ended June 30, 2014,
the costs of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities, other than
short-term securities, amounted to $286,608,878 and $248,950,479, respectively.
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 35 |
Royce Value Trust |
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued)
Transactions in Affiliated Companies:
An Affiliated Company as defined
in the Investment Company Act of 1940, is a company in which a fund owns 5% or more
of the companys outstanding voting securities at any time during the period.
The Fund effected the following transactions in shares of such companies for the
six months ended June 30, 2014:
Affiliated Company | Shares
12/31/13 |
Market
Value 12/31/13 |
Cost
of Purchases |
Cost
of Sales |
Realized
Gain (Loss) |
Dividend
Income |
Shares
6/30/14 |
Market
Value 6/30/14 |
||||||||
Stanley Furniture | 50,000 | $ 192,000 | $2,549,923 | | | | 1,012,235 | $2,712,790 | ||||||||
Timberland Bancorp | 444,200 | 4,273,204 | | | | $35,536 | 444,200 | 4,681,868 | ||||||||
$4,465,204 | $35,536 | $7,394,658 |
36 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | June 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | |||||
COMMON STOCKS 99.8% | ||||||
Consumer Discretionary 15.3% | ||||||
Auto Components - 1.8% | ||||||
China Zenix Auto International ADR 1 |
50,000 | $ | 112,000 | |||
Drew Industries |
85,600 | 4,280,856 | ||||
Fuel Systems Solutions 1 |
76,000 | 846,640 | ||||
Motorcar Parts of America 1 |
53,900 | 1,312,465 | ||||
Spartan Motors |
55,500 | 251,970 | ||||
Standard Motor Products |
26,000 | 1,161,420 | ||||
7,965,351 | ||||||
Automobiles - 0.0% | ||||||
Winnebago Industries 1 |
3,100 | 78,058 | ||||
Distributors - 0.6% | ||||||
Core-Mark Holding Company |
25,200 | 1,149,876 | ||||
Weyco Group |
59,600 | 1,633,636 | ||||
2,783,512 | ||||||
Diversified Consumer Services - 0.8% | ||||||
American Public Education 1 |
5,500 | 189,090 | ||||
Capella Education |
2,700 | 146,853 | ||||
Collectors Universe |
82,700 | 1,620,093 | ||||
Lincoln Educational Services |
342,200 | 1,536,478 | ||||
7 | 3,885 | |||||
3,496,399 | ||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure - 0.1% | ||||||
Monarch Casino & Resort 1 |
31,997 | 484,434 | ||||
Household Durables - 3.9% | ||||||
Cavco Industries 1 |
3,091 | 263,662 | ||||
Ethan Allen Interiors 3 |
81,600 | 2,018,784 | ||||
Flexsteel Industries |
125,700 | 4,192,095 | ||||
iRobot Corporation 1 |
15,000 | 614,250 | ||||
Koss Corporation |
73,400 | 231,944 | ||||
Lifetime Brands |
204,594 | 3,216,218 | ||||
Skyline Corporation 1 |
183,400 | 753,774 | ||||
Stanley Furniture 1 |
93,468 | 250,494 | ||||
97,300 | 899,052 | |||||
Universal Electronics 1 |
92,100 | 4,501,848 | ||||
16,942,121 | ||||||
Internet & Catalog Retail - 0.5% | ||||||
dELiA*s 1 |
23,300 | 17,946 | ||||
FTD Companies 1 |
69,700 | 2,215,763 | ||||
Geeknet 1 |
1,500 | 18,705 | ||||
2,252,414 | ||||||
Leisure Products - 0.9% | ||||||
Arctic Cat |
29,564 | 1,165,413 | ||||
67,100 | 493,185 | |||||
Nautilus 1 |
186,100 | 2,063,849 | ||||
Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation 1 |
20,700 | 300,978 | ||||
4,023,425 | ||||||
Media - 1.5% | ||||||
Rentrak Corporation 1 |
58,600 | 3,073,570 | ||||
Saga Communications Cl. A |
12,100 | 516,912 | ||||
Value Line |
169,000 | 2,840,890 | ||||
6,431,372 | ||||||
Multiline Retail - 0.3% | ||||||
Tuesday Morning 1 |
61,400 | 1,094,148 | ||||
Specialty Retail - 3.1% | ||||||
Aeropostale 1 |
65,000 | 226,850 | ||||
83,500 | 3,302,425 | |||||
Cache 1 |
340,800 | 548,688 | ||||
Destination Maternity |
80,100 | 1,823,877 | ||||
Kirklands 1 |
12,300 | 228,165 | ||||
Le Chateau Cl. A 1 |
685,000 | 1,129,844 | ||||
Lewis Group |
57,000 | 347,306 | ||||
Shoe Carnival 3 |
41,228 | 851,358 | ||||
Stage Stores 3 |
25,000 | 467,250 | ||||
Stein Mart 3 |
178,900 | 2,484,921 | ||||
44,000 | 632,280 | |||||
Tandy Leather Factory 1 |
44,233 | 402,520 | ||||
TravelCenters of America LLC 1 |
12,500 | 111,000 | ||||
West Marine 1 |
101,600 | 1,042,416 | ||||
13,598,900 | ||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods - 1.8% | ||||||
Crown Crafts |
255,759 | 1,992,363 | ||||
Culp |
44,500 | 774,745 | ||||
1,600 | 130,656 | |||||
J.G. Boswell Company 2 |
2,490 | 2,524,860 | ||||
Marimekko |
25,300 | 336,386 | ||||
Movado Group 3 |
44,374 | 1,849,065 | ||||
7,608,075 | ||||||
Total (Cost $48,134,182) | 66,758,209 | |||||
Consumer Staples 1.6% | ||||||
Beverages - 0.1% | ||||||
58,124 | 525,441 | |||||
Food Products - 1.3% | ||||||
Calavo Growers 3 |
1,800 | 60,894 | ||||
Farmer Bros. 1 |
62,400 | 1,348,464 | ||||
John B. Sanfilippo & Son |
3,500 | 92,645 | ||||
Seneca Foods Cl. A 1 |
51,400 | 1,572,840 | ||||
Seneca Foods Cl. B 1 |
42,500 | 1,266,500 | ||||
SunOpta 1 |
63,000 | 887,040 | ||||
806,207 | 306,359 | |||||
5,534,742 | ||||||
Household Products - 0.0% | ||||||
Orchids Paper Products |
2,000 | 64,080 | ||||
Personal Products - 0.2% | ||||||
Inter Parfums 3 |
24,800 | 732,840 | ||||
Total (Cost $4,195,360) | 6,857,103 | |||||
Energy 2.6% | ||||||
Energy Equipment & Services - 2.0% | ||||||
Dawson Geophysical |
53,213 | 1,524,553 | ||||
16,200 | 892,296 | |||||
35,000 | 1,400 | |||||
Gulf Island Fabrication |
29,116 | 626,576 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 37 |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | |||||
Energy (continued) | ||||||
Energy Equipment & Services (continued) | ||||||
12,100 | $ | 396,759 | ||||
Newpark Resources 1 |
64,500 | 803,670 | ||||
North American Energy Partners |
50,000 | 402,500 | ||||
10,000 | 201,100 | |||||
57,500 | 1,008,550 | |||||
Tesco Corporation 3 |
58,000 | 1,237,720 | ||||
Willbros Group 1 |
131,100 | 1,619,085 | ||||
8,714,209 | ||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels - 0.6% | ||||||
12,000 | 272,760 | |||||
Harvest Natural Resources 1 |
13,176 | 65,748 | ||||
102,100 | 882,144 | |||||
Sprott Resource 1 |
91,800 | 271,860 | ||||
StealthGas 1 |
74,500 | 826,950 | ||||
79,200 | 572,616 | |||||
2,892,078 | ||||||
Total (Cost $8,729,315) | 11,606,287 | |||||
Financials 16.0% | ||||||
Banks - 1.7% | ||||||
Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son |
438,100 | 871,819 | ||||
BCB Holdings 1 |
906,207 | 205,492 | ||||
Bryn Mawr Bank |
25,000 | 728,000 | ||||
Chemung Financial |
31,000 | 915,740 | ||||
Fauquier Bankshares |
140,200 | 2,234,788 | ||||
First Bancorp (The) |
40,200 | 701,892 | ||||
First Internet Bancorp |
28,500 | 587,100 | ||||
Peapack-Gladstone Financial |
53,606 | 1,136,983 | ||||
7,381,814 | ||||||
Capital Markets - 7.5% | ||||||
ASA Gold and Precious Metals |
206,150 | 3,020,098 | ||||
Cowen Group 1 |
353,900 | 1,493,458 | ||||
Diamond Hill Investment Group |
31,879 | 4,071,586 | ||||
Equity Trustees |
42,229 | 835,420 | ||||
Fiera Capital |
78,000 | 935,664 | ||||
26,310 | 524,095 | |||||
JZ Capital Partners |
253,999 | 1,919,173 | ||||
Manning & Napier Cl. A |
37,000 | 638,620 | ||||
MVC Capital |
387,400 | 5,016,830 | ||||
NGP Capital Resources |
185,034 | 1,152,762 | ||||
Queen City Investments 2 |
948 | 1,042,800 | ||||
RHJ International 1 |
348,000 | 1,694,969 | ||||
Silvercrest Asset Management Group Cl. A |
234,700 | 4,039,187 | ||||
Sprott |
622,200 | 1,766,802 | ||||
U.S. Global Investors Cl. A |
651,254 | 2,292,414 | ||||
Urbana Corporation |
237,600 | 405,259 | ||||
Westwood Holdings Group 3 |
31,600 | 1,897,264 | ||||
32,746,401 | ||||||
Consumer Finance - 1.1% | ||||||
EZCORP Cl. A 1 |
194,400 | 2,245,320 | ||||
JGWPT Holdings Cl. A 1 |
160,000 | 1,801,600 | ||||
Regional Management 1 |
51,400 | 795,158 | ||||
4,842,078 | ||||||
Diversified Financial Services - 1.1% | ||||||
Banca Finnat Euramerica |
1,310,000 | 835,365 | ||||
GAIN Capital Holdings |
25,000 | 196,750 | ||||
HF2 Financial Management Cl. A 1 |
207,700 | 2,139,310 | ||||
45,700 | 1,085,832 | |||||
Warsaw Stock Exchange |
52,900 | 677,950 | ||||
4,935,207 | ||||||
Insurance - 2.0% | ||||||
Hallmark Financial Services 1 |
138,000 | 1,483,500 | ||||
Independence Holding Company |
105,380 | 1,489,019 | ||||
8,033 | 2,003,511 | |||||
109,264 | 2,560,055 | |||||
United Fire Group 3 |
38,603 | 1,131,840 | ||||
8,667,925 | ||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) - 0.4% | ||||||
BRT Realty Trust 1 |
228,681 | 1,687,666 | ||||
Real Estate Management & Development - 2.1% | ||||||
AV Homes 1 |
36,400 | 595,140 | ||||
Consolidated-Tomoka Land |
50,146 | 2,301,702 | ||||
53,000 | 1,011,770 | |||||
Griffin Land & Nurseries |
47,746 | 1,408,507 | ||||
112,162 | 3,610,495 | |||||
Tejon Ranch (Warrants) 1 |
16,567 | 48,541 | ||||
ZipRealty 1 |
25,000 | 75,750 | ||||
9,051,905 | ||||||
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance - 0.1% | ||||||
Alliance Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania |
41,344 | 653,235 | ||||
Total (Cost $58,013,676) | 69,966,231 | |||||
Health Care 8.3% | ||||||
Biotechnology - 1.4% | ||||||
Achillion Pharmaceuticals 1 |
2,262 | 17,123 | ||||
Amicus Therapeutics 1 |
191,400 | 639,276 | ||||
ARIAD Pharmaceuticals 1 |
154,102 | 981,630 | ||||
ArQule 1 |
70,000 | 108,500 | ||||
Celsion Corporation 1 |
115,555 | 400,976 | ||||
ChemoCentryx 1 |
70,000 | 409,500 | ||||
Coronado Biosciences 1 |
360,000 | 619,200 | ||||
Infinity Pharmaceuticals 1 |
100,300 | 1,277,822 | ||||
Rigel Pharmaceuticals 1 |
152,392 | 553,183 | ||||
Synthetic Biologics 1 |
226,000 | 388,720 | ||||
210,000 | 846,300 | |||||
6,242,230 | ||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies - 4.4% | ||||||
Allied Healthcare Products 1 |
131,772 | 317,571 | ||||
104,800 | 1,711,384 | |||||
Atrion Corporation |
12,497 | 4,074,022 | ||||
CryoLife |
54,473 | 487,533 | ||||
Cynosure Cl. A 1 |
3,500 | 74,375 |
38 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
June 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
SHARES | VALUE | |||||
Health Care (continued) | ||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies (continued) | ||||||
Derma Sciences 1 |
30,000 | $ | 346,800 | |||
20,000 | 1,300 | |||||
Exactech 1 |
170,800 | 4,309,284 | ||||
Invacare Corporation 3 |
132,500 | 2,434,025 | ||||
STRATEC Biomedical |
14,000 | 722,621 | ||||
Symmetry Medical 1 |
11,900 | 105,434 | ||||
219,285 | 679,783 | |||||
Syneron Medical 1 |
69,200 | 714,144 | ||||
Trinity Biotech ADR Cl. A |
42,200 | 971,866 | ||||
Utah Medical Products |
42,300 | 2,175,912 | ||||
19,126,054 | ||||||
Health Care Providers & Services - 2.1% | ||||||
Addus HomeCare 1 |
59,400 | 1,335,312 | ||||
19,500 | 589,290 | |||||
40,000 | 1,807,200 | |||||
Cross Country Healthcare 1 |
277,900 | 1,811,908 | ||||
PDI 1 |
65,383 | 286,378 | ||||
40,000 | 1,143,600 | |||||
Psychemedics Corporation |
77,900 | 1,103,064 | ||||
U.S. Physical Therapy |
33,257 | 1,137,057 | ||||
9,213,809 | ||||||
Health Care Technology - 0.2% | ||||||
Computer Programs and Systems |
5,000 | 318,000 | ||||
HealthStream 1 |
24,227 | 588,716 | ||||
906,716 | ||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services - 0.2% | ||||||
Affymetrix 1 |
90,000 | 801,900 | ||||
Total (Cost $27,274,942) | 36,290,709 | |||||
Industrials 25.5% | ||||||
Aerospace & Defense - 2.1% | ||||||
Astronics Corporation 1 |
6,444 | 363,764 | ||||
420 | 23,604 | |||||
Breeze-Eastern Corporation 1 |
24,233 | 308,971 | ||||
CPI Aerostructures 1 |
96,709 | 1,225,303 | ||||
Ducommun 1 |
115,800 | 3,025,854 | ||||
Innovative Solutions and Support 1 |
142,828 | 1,062,640 | ||||
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions 1 |
72,324 | 564,127 | ||||
SIFCO Industries |
45,800 | 1,428,960 | ||||
Sparton Corporation 1 |
35,700 | 990,318 | ||||
8,993,541 | ||||||
Air Freight & Logistics - 0.2% | ||||||
Echo Global Logistics 1 |
36,800 | 705,456 | ||||
Building Products - 3.4% | ||||||
97,650 | 3,273,228 | |||||
64,800 | 2,065,176 | |||||
Apogee Enterprises |
57,900 | 2,018,394 | ||||
Burnham Holdings Cl. A 2 |
118,109 | 2,149,584 | ||||
Griffon Corporation 3 |
36,300 | 450,120 | ||||
Insteel Industries |
39,000 | 766,350 | ||||
51,400 | 1,481,348 | |||||
Water Furnace Renewable Energy |
100,000 | 2,840,541 | ||||
15,044,741 | ||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies - 1.5% | ||||||
CompX International Cl. A |
107,500 | 1,123,375 | ||||
Heritage-Crystal Clean 1 |
208,163 | 4,086,240 | ||||
35,000 | 1,435,700 | |||||
6,645,315 | ||||||
Construction & Engineering - 3.3% | ||||||
Ameresco Cl. A 1 |
295,700 | 2,078,771 | ||||
930,511 | 6,085,542 | |||||
82,500 | 1,097,250 | |||||
107,100 | 2,712,843 | |||||
Orbit Garant Drilling 1 |
1,512,500 | 2,055,316 | ||||
40,500 | 362,880 | |||||
14,392,602 | ||||||
Electrical Equipment - 1.9% | ||||||
AZZ |
16,494 | 760,043 | ||||
Encore Wire 3 |
15,000 | 735,600 | ||||
Global Power Equipment Group |
111,049 | 1,794,552 | ||||
Jinpan International |
35,000 | 235,900 | ||||
LSI Industries |
93,012 | 742,236 | ||||
Orion Energy Systems 1 |
100,000 | 407,000 | ||||
36,550 | 2,389,639 | |||||
Preformed Line Products |
18,143 | 976,638 | ||||
Vicor 1 |
30,000 | 251,400 | ||||
8,293,008 | ||||||
Industrial Conglomerates - 0.7% | ||||||
Raven Industries 3 |
93,400 | 3,095,276 | ||||
Machinery - 6.1% | ||||||
Alamo Group |
14,200 | 768,078 | ||||
CB Industrial Product Holding |
146,800 | 200,244 | ||||
CIRCOR International 3 |
15,100 | 1,164,663 | ||||
Columbus McKinnon |
9,650 | 261,033 | ||||
Douglas Dynamics |
50,000 | 881,000 | ||||
Eastern Company (The) |
39,750 | 613,740 | ||||
59,200 | 3,203,904 | |||||
Graham Corporation |
100,550 | 3,500,146 | ||||
Hurco Companies |
57,266 | 1,614,901 | ||||
Kadant |
27,900 | 1,072,755 | ||||
Luxfer Holdings ADR |
45,100 | 854,645 | ||||
NN |
164,300 | 4,202,794 | ||||
PMFG 1 |
223,245 | 1,176,501 | ||||
Sarine Technologies |
299,700 | 617,715 | ||||
Standex International 3 |
18,900 | 1,407,672 | ||||
Sun Hydraulics |
19,900 | 807,940 | ||||
59,000 | 4,502,880 | |||||
26,850,611 | ||||||
Marine - 0.2% | ||||||
Clarkson |
21,000 | 860,748 | ||||
Professional Services - 2.9% | ||||||
Acacia Research |
58,800 | 1,043,700 | ||||
CBIZ 1 |
47,000 | 424,410 | ||||
40,765 | 3,021,094 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 39 |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | |||||
Industrials (continued) | ||||||
Professional Services (continued) | ||||||
Franklin Covey 1 |
70,100 | $ | 1,411,113 | |||
25,385 | 656,964 | |||||
Heidrick & Struggles International |
112,468 | 2,080,658 | ||||
ICF International 1 |
15,700 | 555,152 | ||||
Kforce 3 |
69,600 | 1,506,840 | ||||
Mistras Group 1 |
4,100 | 100,532 | ||||
Resources Connection |
17,200 | 225,492 | ||||
RPX Corporation 1 |
104,900 | 1,861,975 | ||||
12,887,930 | ||||||
Road & Rail - 1.8% | ||||||
Contrans Group Cl. A |
35,000 | 468,722 | ||||
Marten Transport |
5,200 | 116,220 | ||||
Patriot Transportation Holding 1 |
111,681 | 3,905,485 | ||||
Universal Truckload Services |
134,200 | 3,403,312 | ||||
7,893,739 | ||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors - 1.1% | ||||||
Aceto Corporation |
72,219 | 1,310,052 | ||||
Houston Wire & Cable |
162,075 | 2,011,351 | ||||
Lawson Products 1 |
50,269 | 818,882 | ||||
MFC Industrial |
70,000 | 535,500 | ||||
4,675,785 | ||||||
Transportation Infrastructure - 0.3% | ||||||
Touax |
53,197 | 1,306,069 | ||||
Total (Cost $70,160,166) | 111,644,821 | |||||
Information Technology 19.2% | ||||||
Communications Equipment - 1.1% | ||||||
Bel Fuse Cl. A |
67,705 | 1,664,189 | ||||
CalAmp Corporation 1 |
28,800 | 623,808 | ||||
Ceragon Networks 1 |
29,700 | 75,438 | ||||
ClearOne 1 |
25,000 | 245,750 | ||||
Extreme Networks 1 |
245,000 | 1,087,800 | ||||
KVH Industries 1 |
8,900 | 115,967 | ||||
Oplink Communications 1 |
35,251 | 598,209 | ||||
PCTEL |
44,100 | 356,769 | ||||
Sandvine Corporation 1 |
22,700 | 76,585 | ||||
Sierra Wireless 1 |
4,700 | 94,799 | ||||
4,939,314 | ||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components - 6.4% | ||||||
Agilysys 1 |
170,587 | 2,401,865 | ||||
Deswell Industries |
544,371 | 1,121,404 | ||||
DTS 1 |
73,900 | 1,360,499 | ||||
Inficon Holding |
3,600 | 1,173,207 | ||||
LRAD Corporation 1 |
557,256 | 1,147,947 | ||||
Maxwell Technologies 1 |
17,594 | 266,197 | ||||
Mercury Systems 1 |
10,900 | 123,606 | ||||
Mesa Laboratories |
52,589 | 4,415,373 | ||||
115,400 | 2,134,900 | |||||
Orbotech 1 |
73,500 | 1,115,730 | ||||
PC Connection |
59,000 | 1,220,120 | ||||
Perceptron |
9,000 | 114,750 | ||||
Pulse Electronics 1 |
251,793 | 629,483 | ||||
Richardson Electronics |
330,900 | 3,464,523 | ||||
54,200 | 3,596,170 | |||||
139,400 | 1,143,080 | |||||
Vishay Precision Group 1 |
154,000 | 2,534,840 | ||||
27,963,694 | ||||||
Internet Software & Services - 2.8% | ||||||
GTT Communications 1 |
232,660 | 2,375,458 | ||||
Marchex Cl. B |
95,000 | 1,141,900 | ||||
75,000 | 48,750 | |||||
Move 1 |
51,700 | 764,643 | ||||
QuinStreet 1 |
218,600 | 1,204,486 | ||||
RealNetworks 1 |
225,200 | 1,718,276 | ||||
Reis |
25,000 | 527,000 | ||||
Stamps.com 1 |
3,100 | 104,439 | ||||
Support.com 1 |
631,563 | 1,711,536 | ||||
101,700 | 2,404,188 | |||||
United Online 1 |
19,400 | 201,760 | ||||
12,202,436 | ||||||
IT Services - 2.0% | ||||||
Cass Information Systems 3 |
29,150 | 1,442,342 | ||||
Computer Task Group 3 |
140,400 | 2,310,984 | ||||
CSE Global |
554,700 | 271,367 | ||||
eClerx Services |
1,100 | 21,252 | ||||
ExlService Holdings 1 |
2,800 | 82,460 | ||||
Forrester Research 3 |
61,700 | 2,337,196 | ||||
Hackett Group (The) |
145,500 | 868,635 | ||||
Higher One Holdings 1 |
17,500 | 66,675 | ||||
Innodata 1 |
362,139 | 1,166,087 | ||||
Sykes Enterprises 1 |
6,300 | 136,899 | ||||
8,703,897 | ||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment - 4.3% | ||||||
41,200 | 793,100 | |||||
Amtech Systems 1 |
155,900 | 1,906,657 | ||||
Audience 1 |
8,700 | 104,052 | ||||
Brooks Automation |
187,300 | 2,017,221 | ||||
CEVA 1 |
98,122 | 1,449,262 | ||||
Entropic Communications 1 |
235,247 | 783,373 | ||||
233,208 | 2,635,250 | |||||
Integrated Silicon Solution 1 |
26,967 | 398,303 | ||||
IXYS Corporation |
18,800 | 231,616 | ||||
Kulicke & Soffa Industries 1 |
67,900 | 968,254 | ||||
Miraial |
22,030 | 400,130 | ||||
MoSys 1 |
182,275 | 572,344 | ||||
Nanometrics 1 |
50,800 | 927,100 | ||||
PDF Solutions 1 |
6,050 | 128,381 | ||||
Photronics 1 |
145,000 | 1,247,000 | ||||
76,899 | 672,866 | |||||
52,500 | 518,700 | |||||
Silicon Image 1 |
160,600 | 809,424 | ||||
Silicon Motion Technology ADR |
62,900 | 1,285,047 | ||||
Ultra Clean Holdings 1 |
68,800 | 622,640 | ||||
Xcerra Corporation 1 |
22,400 | 203,840 | ||||
18,674,560 | ||||||
Software - 1.3% | ||||||
Actuate Corporation 1 |
140,800 | 671,616 |
40 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
June 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
SHARES | VALUE | |||||
Information Technology (continued) | ||||||
Software (continued) | ||||||
American Software Cl. A |
141,496 | $ | 1,397,981 | |||
BSQUARE Corporation 1 |
193,875 | 620,400 | ||||
Ellie Mae 1 |
10,300 | 320,639 | ||||
Envivio 1 |
470,000 | 1,128,000 | ||||
SeaChange International 1 |
224,000 | 1,794,240 | ||||
5,932,876 | ||||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals - 1.3% | ||||||
Intevac 1 |
262,200 | 2,100,222 | ||||
Qumu Corporation 1 |
202,200 | 2,828,778 | ||||
TransAct Technologies |
78,600 | 814,296 | ||||
5,743,296 | ||||||
Total (Cost $69,578,738) | 84,160,073 | |||||
Materials 7.5% | ||||||
Chemicals - 2.4% | ||||||
63,375 | 3,394,365 | |||||
Hawkins 3 |
29,697 | 1,102,946 | ||||
KMG Chemicals |
58,300 | 1,048,234 | ||||
Landec Corporation 1 |
75,610 | 944,369 | ||||
Quaker Chemical |
52,800 | 4,054,512 | ||||
10,544,426 | ||||||
Construction Materials - 0.7% | ||||||
Ash Grove Cement 2 |
8,000 | 1,840,000 | ||||
Monarch Cement |
52,303 | 1,370,339 | ||||
3,210,339 | ||||||
Containers & Packaging - 0.2% | ||||||
UFP Technologies 1 |
28,617 | 689,383 | ||||
Metals & Mining - 4.2% | ||||||
AuRico Gold |
91,250 | 388,725 | ||||
Central Steel & Wire 2 |
788 | 587,060 | ||||
Comstock Mining 1 |
375,000 | 626,250 | ||||
Exeter Resource 1 |
196,500 | 139,515 | ||||
Geodrill 1 |
252,300 | 193,886 | ||||
Haynes International 3 |
48,801 | 2,761,649 | ||||
Hecla Mining |
44,518 | 153,587 | ||||
53,488 | 976,691 | |||||
Imdex 1 |
633,900 | 376,573 | ||||
MAG Silver 1 |
74,750 | 707,135 | ||||
Major Drilling Group International |
316,000 | 2,301,036 | ||||
Materion Corporation |
50,000 | 1,849,500 | ||||
Midway Gold 1 |
345,000 | 310,500 | ||||
Olympic Steel |
103,100 | 2,551,725 | ||||
Pretium Resources 1 |
120,000 | 993,018 | ||||
25,000 | 664,750 | |||||
Universal Stainless & Alloy Products 1 |
80,900 | 2,627,632 | ||||
18,209,232 | ||||||
Paper & Forest Products - 0.0% | ||||||
1,500,000 | 19,354 | |||||
Total (Cost $24,371,602) | 32,672,734 | |||||
Utilities 0.1% | ||||||
Independent Power & Renewable Electricity Producer - 0.1% | ||||||
Alterra Power 1 |
450,000 | 147,603 | ||||
China Hydroelectric ADS 1 |
73,100 | 250,733 | ||||
Total (Cost $754,614) | 398,336 | |||||
Miscellaneous 7 3.7% | ||||||
Total (Cost $16,736,059) | 16,280,934 | |||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | ||||||
(Cost $327,948,654) |
436,635,437 | |||||
PREFERRED STOCK 0.3% | ||||||
(Cost $578,719) |
45,409 | 1,441,736 | ||||
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT 7.4% | ||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, | ||||||
0.00% dated 6/30/14, due 7/1/14, |
||||||
maturity value $32,127,000 (collateralized |
||||||
by obligations of various U.S. Government |
||||||
Agencies, 0.25% due 12/2/14-3/31/15, valued at |
||||||
$32,771,594) |
||||||
(Cost $32,127,000) |
32,127,000 | |||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 107.5% | ||||||
(Cost $360,654,373) |
470,204,173 | |||||
LIABILITIES LESS CASH | ||||||
AND OTHER ASSETS (7.5)% |
(32,876,895 | ) | ||||
NET ASSETS 100.0% | $ | 437,327,278 | ||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 41 |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | |
Schedule of Investments |
42 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
ASSETS: | ||||
Investments at value | ||||
Non-Affiliated Companies (cost $326,761,578) |
$ | 431,991,631 | ||
Affiliated Companies (cost $1,765,795) |
6,085,542 | |||
Total investments at value | 438,077,173 | |||
Repurchase agreements (at cost and value) | 32,127,000 | |||
Receivable for investments sold | 16,290,734 | |||
Receivable for dividends and interest | 249,184 | |||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 27,576 | |||
Total Assets |
486,771,667 | |||
LIABILITIES: | ||||
Revolving credit agreement | 45,000,000 | |||
Payable to custodian for cash overdrawn and foreign currency | 3,431,466 | |||
Payable for investments purchased | 581,062 | |||
Payable for investment advisory fee | 340,654 | |||
Payable for interest expense | 5,923 | |||
Accrued expenses | 85,284 | |||
Total Liabilities |
49,444,389 | |||
Net Assets |
$ | 437,327,278 | ||
ANALYSIS OF NET ASSETS: | ||||
Paid-in capital - $0.001 par value per share; 31,187,368 shares outstanding (150,000,000 shares authorized) | $ | 258,787,536 | ||
Undistributed net investment income (loss) | (940,300 | ) | ||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 84,411,789 | |||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency | 109,551,923 | |||
Quarterly distributions | (14,483,670 | ) | ||
Net Assets (net asset value per share - $14.02) |
$ | 437,327,278 | ||
Investments at identified cost |
$ | 328,527,373 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 43 |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | |
Statement of Operations |
INVESTMENT INCOME: | ||||
Income: | ||||
Dividends |
$ | 2,118,459 | ||
Foreign withholding tax |
(54,289 | ) | ||
Rehypothecation income |
71,576 | |||
Total income | 2,135,746 | |||
Expenses: | ||||
Investment advisory fees |
1,966,064 | |||
Interest expense |
267,440 | |||
Stockholder reports |
62,763 | |||
Custody and transfer agent fees |
52,470 | |||
Directors fees |
41,116 | |||
Professional fees |
24,022 | |||
Administrative and office facilities |
21,381 | |||
Other expenses |
28,494 | |||
Total expenses | 2,463,750 | |||
Compensating balance credits | (31 | ) | ||
Net expenses | 2,463,719 | |||
Net investment income (loss) | (327,973 | ) | ||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND FOREIGN CURRENCY: | ||||
Net realized gain (loss): | ||||
Investments in Non-Affiliated Companies |
61,203,329 | |||
Investments in Affiliated Companies |
17,045 | |||
Foreign currency transactions |
(13,573 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation): | ||||
Investments and foreign currency translations |
(48,527,434 | ) | ||
Other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency |
(1,678 | ) | ||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 12,677,689 | |||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS | $ | 12,349,716 |
44 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
Six months ended | |||||||
6/30/14 | Year ended | ||||||
(unaudited) | 12/31/13 | ||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | |||||||
Net investment income (loss) | $ | (327,973 | ) | $ | 290,965 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 61,206,801 | 56,051,091 | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency | (48,529,112 | ) | 80,679,878 | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from investment operations | 12,349,716 | 137,021,934 | |||||
DISTRIBUTIONS: | |||||||
Net investment income | | (933,371 | ) | ||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency | | (39,825,192 | ) | ||||
Quarterly distributions1 | (14,483,670 | ) | | ||||
Total distributions | (14,483,670 | ) | (40,758,563 | ) | |||
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: | |||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 6,340,052 | 18,312,849 | |||||
Total capital stock transactions | 6,340,052 | 18,312,849 | |||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS | 4,206,098 | 114,576,220 | |||||
NET ASSETS: | |||||||
Beginning of period |
433,121,180 | 318,544,960 | |||||
End of period (including undistributed net investment income (loss) of $(940,300) at 6/30/14 and |
|||||||
$(612,327) at 12/31/13) |
$ | 437,327,278 | $ | 433,121,180 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 45 |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
Statement of Cash Flows |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from investment operations | $ | 12,349,717 | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||
Purchases of long-term investments |
(89,209,122 | ) | ||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of long-term investments |
109,613,432 | |||
Net purchases, sales and maturities of short-term investments |
(15,726,000 | ) | ||
Net (increase) decrease in dividends and interest receivable and other assets |
347,471 | |||
Net increase (decrease) in interest expense payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
7,171 | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments |
48,527,434 | |||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
(61,206,801 | ) | ||
Cash provided by operating activities | 4,703,302 | |||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||
Distributions | (14,483,670 | ) | ||
Reinvestment of distributions | 6,340,052 | |||
Cash used for financing activities | (8,143,618 | ) | ||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH: | (3,440,316 | ) | ||
Cash and foreign currency at beginning of period |
8,850 | |||
Cash and foreign currency at end of period |
$ | (3,431,466 | ) |
46 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
Financial Highlights |
This table is presented to show selected data for a share of Common Stock outstanding throughout each period, and to assist stockholders in evaluating the Funds performance for the periods presented.
Six months ended | Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | $ | 14.12 | $ | 10.93 | $ | 9.86 | $ | 11.34 | $ | 8.90 | $ | 6.39 | |||||||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
(0.01 | ) | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency |
0.41 | 4.64 | 1.58 | (0.82 | ) | 2.58 | 2.88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total investment operations |
0.40 | 4.65 | 1.73 | (0.78 | ) | 2.66 | 2.88 | ||||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
| | (0.02 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.10 | ) | (0.04 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
| | (0.09 | ) | (0.11 | ) | (0.03 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Return of capital |
| | | | | (0.09 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to Preferred Stockholders |
| | (0.11 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.13 | ) | |||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
0.40 | 4.65 | 1.62 | (0.91 | ) | 2.53 | 2.75 | ||||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
| (0.03 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.06 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
| (1.35 | ) | (0.43 | ) | (0.24 | ) | (0.02 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Return of capital |
| | | (0.24 | ) | | (0.22 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Quarterly distributions1 |
(0.47 | ) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to Common Stockholders |
(0.47 | ) | (1.38 | ) | (0.51 | ) | (0.53 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.22 | ) | |||||||||||||
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of reinvestment of distributions by Common Stockholders |
(0.03 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total capital stock transactions |
(0.03 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 14.02 | $ | 14.12 | $ | 10.93 | $ | 9.86 | $ | 11.34 | $ | 8.90 | |||||||||||||
MARKET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 12.62 | $ | 12.61 | $ | 9.45 | $ | 8.77 | $ | 9.80 | $ | 7.37 | |||||||||||||
TOTAL RETURN: 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Market Value | 3.87 | %3 | 49.42 | % | 13.95 | % | (4.99 | )% | 34.10 | % | 37.91 | % | |||||||||||||
Net Asset Value | 3.06 | %3 | 44.66 | % | 17.23 | % | (7.69 | )% | 28.50 | % | 46.47 | % | |||||||||||||
RATIOS BASED ON AVERAGE NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment advisory fee expense4 |
0.93 | %5 | 0.82 | % | 1.12 | % | 0.97 | % | 0.97 | % | 1.38 | % | |||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
0.24 | %5 | 0.29 | % | 0.18 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.21 | % | |||||||||||||
Total expenses (net)6 | 1.17 | %5 | 1.11 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.12 | % | 1.12 | % | 1.59 | % | |||||||||||||
Expenses net of fee waivers and excluding interest expense |
1.04 | %5 | 0.96 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.12 | % | 1.12 | % | 1.59 | % | |||||||||||||
Expenses prior to fee waivers and balance credits | 1.17 | %5 | 1.11 | % | 1.32 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.74 | % | |||||||||||||
Expenses prior to fee waivers | 1.17 | %5 | 1.11 | % | 1.32 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.74 | % | |||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | (0.16 | )%5 | 0.08 | % | 1.46 | % | 0.40 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.02 | % | |||||||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period (in thousands) |
$ | 437,327 | $ | 433,121 | $ | 318,545 | $ | 279,292 | $ | 311,279 | $ | 243,156 | |||||||||||||
Liquidation Value of Preferred Stock, End of Period (in thousands) |
$ | 60,000 | $ | 60,000 | $ | 60,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 20 | % | 29 | % | 28 | % | 30 | % | 27 | % | 30 | % | |||||||||||||
PREFERRED STOCK: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total shares outstanding | 2,400,000 | 2,400,000 | 2,400,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per share | $ | 141.37 | $ | 154.70 | $ | 126.32 | |||||||||||||||||||
Liquidation preference per share | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average month-end market value per share | $ | 25.41 | $ | 25.11 | $ | 23.47 | |||||||||||||||||||
REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage | 1072 | % | 1062 | % | 808 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per $1,000 | $ | 10,718 | $ | 10,625 | $ | 8,079 | |||||||||||||||||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 47 |
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) |
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds investments, as noted above. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels below: | ||
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. |
||
Level 2 other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, foreign securities that may be fair valued and repurchase agreements). The table below includes all Level 2 securities. Level 2 securities with values based on quoted prices for similar securities are noted in the Schedule of Investments. |
||
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs (including last trade price before trading was suspended, or at a discount thereto for lack of marketability or otherwise, market price information regarding other securities, information received from the company and/or published documents, including SEC filings and financial statements, or other publicly available information). |
||
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. | ||
The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the Funds investments as of June 30, 2014. For a detailed breakout of common stocks by sector classification, please refer to the Schedule of Investments. |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 427,561,041 | $ | 8,748,683 | $ | 325,713 | $ | 436,635,437 | ||||||||
Preferred Stocks | | 1,441,736 | | 1,441,736 | ||||||||||||
Cash Equivalents | | 32,127,000 | | 32,127,000 | ||||||||||||
For the six months ended June 30, 2014, certain securities have transferred in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements as a result of the fair value pricing procedures for international equities. The Fund recognizes transfers between levels as of the end of the reporting period. At June 30, 2014, securities valued at $50,150 were transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Level 3 Reconciliation:
Balance as of 12/31/13 | Unrealized Gain (Loss)1 | Balance as of 6/30/14 | |||||
Common Stocks | $139,469 | $186,244 | $325,713 |
48 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 49
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
Shares | Market Value | Cost of | Cost of | Realized | Dividend | Shares | Market Value | |||||||||
Affiliated Company | 12/31/13 | 12/31/13 | Purchases | Sales | Gain (Loss) | Income | 6/30/14 | 6/30/14 | ||||||||
Integrated Electrical Services | 934,200 | $5,035,338 | | $6,825 | $17,045 | | 930,511 | $6,085,542 | ||||||||
$5,035,338 | $17,045 | $6,085,542 |
50 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders
Royce Focus Trust | June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | ||||||
COMMON STOCKS 97.1% | |||||||
Consumer Discretionary 8.1% | |||||||
Automobiles - 2.8% | |||||||
Thor Industries |
105,000 | $ | 5,971,350 | ||||
Household Durables - 1.1% | |||||||
Garmin |
40,000 | 2,436,000 | |||||
Specialty Retail - 4.2% | |||||||
Buckle (The) |
100,000 | 4,436,000 | |||||
GameStop Corporation Cl. A |
110,000 | 4,451,700 | |||||
8,887,700 | |||||||
Total (Cost $11,660,238) | 17,295,050 | ||||||
Consumer Staples 6.6% | |||||||
Food Products - 4.7% | |||||||
Cal-Maine Foods |
40,000 | 2,972,800 | |||||
Industrias Bachoco ADR |
85,000 | 4,570,450 | |||||
Sanderson Farms |
25,000 | 2,430,000 | |||||
9,973,250 | |||||||
Personal Products - 1.9% | |||||||
Nu Skin Enterprises Cl. A |
55,000 | 4,067,800 | |||||
Total (Cost $8,206,663) | 14,041,050 | ||||||
Energy 13.4% | |||||||
Energy Equipment & Services - 10.6% | |||||||
Helmerich & Payne |
40,000 | 4,644,400 | |||||
Pason Systems |
150,000 | 4,217,235 | |||||
TGS-NOPEC Geophysical |
160,000 | 5,115,221 | |||||
Trican Well Service |
320,000 | 5,167,143 | |||||
Unit Corporation 1 |
50,000 | 3,441,500 | |||||
22,585,499 | |||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels - 2.8% | |||||||
Exxon Mobil |
60,000 | 6,040,800 | |||||
Total (Cost $18,595,226) | 28,626,299 | ||||||
Financials 16.5% | |||||||
Capital Markets - 10.9% | |||||||
Ashmore Group |
800,000 | 5,065,743 | |||||
Federated Investors Cl. B |
95,000 | 2,937,400 | |||||
Franklin Resources |
130,000 | 7,519,200 | |||||
Sprott |
1,750,000 | 4,969,308 | |||||
Value Partners Group |
4,000,000 | 2,678,572 | |||||
23,170,223 | |||||||
Diversified Financial Services - 3.0% | |||||||
Berkshire Hathaway Cl. B 1 |
50,000 | 6,328,000 | |||||
Real Estate Management & Development - 2.6% | |||||||
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings |
210,000 | 5,632,200 | |||||
Total (Cost $24,450,949) | 35,130,423 | ||||||
Health Care 5.7% | |||||||
Biotechnology - 4.4% | |||||||
240,000 | 9,340,800 | ||||||
Pharmaceuticals - 1.3% | |||||||
Medicines Company (The) 1 |
100,000 | 2,906,000 | |||||
Total (Cost $8,982,808) | 12,246,800 | ||||||
Industrials 7.8% | |||||||
Construction & Engineering - 1.2% | |||||||
Jacobs Engineering Group 1 |
50,000 | 2,664,000 | |||||
Machinery - 4.2% | |||||||
AGCO Corporation |
40,000 | 2,248,800 | |||||
Lincoln Electric Holdings |
25,000 | 1,747,000 | |||||
Semperit AG Holding |
80,000 | 4,902,095 | |||||
8,897,895 | |||||||
Marine - 0.9% | |||||||
Clarkson |
50,000 | 2,049,401 | |||||
Road & Rail - 1.5% | |||||||
Patriot Transportation Holding 1 |
90,000 | 3,147,300 | |||||
Total (Cost $12,470,682) | 16,758,596 | ||||||
Information Technology 18.4% | |||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment - 4.9% | |||||||
Cirrus Logic 1 |
270,000 | 6,139,800 | |||||
MKS Instruments |
140,000 | 4,373,600 | |||||
10,513,400 | |||||||
Software - 2.4% | |||||||
Microsoft Corporation |
120,000 | 5,004,000 | |||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals - 11.1% | |||||||
Apple |
84,000 | 7,806,120 | |||||
SanDisk Corporation |
60,000 | 6,265,800 | |||||
Western Digital |
105,000 | 9,691,500 | |||||
23,763,420 | |||||||
Total (Cost $24,052,153) | 39,280,820 | ||||||
Materials 20.6% | |||||||
Chemicals - 4.1% | |||||||
Mosaic Company (The) |
90,000 | 4,450,500 | |||||
Westlake Chemical |
50,000 | 4,188,000 | |||||
8,638,500 | |||||||
Metals & Mining - 15.5% | |||||||
Alamos Gold |
160,000 | 1,617,919 | |||||
Franco-Nevada Corporation |
60,000 | 3,440,400 | |||||
Fresnillo |
200,000 | 2,984,681 | |||||
Globe Specialty Metals |
200,000 | 4,156,000 | |||||
400,000 | 1,093,584 | ||||||
Major Drilling Group International |
250,000 | 1,820,440 | |||||
Pan American Silver |
220,000 | 3,377,000 | |||||
Pretium Resources 1 |
200,000 | 1,655,030 | |||||
Randgold Resources ADR |
50,000 | 4,230,000 | |||||
Reliance Steel & Aluminum |
60,000 | 4,422,600 | |||||
Schnitzer Steel Industries Cl. A |
75,000 | 1,955,250 | |||||
Seabridge Gold 1 |
250,000 | 2,345,000 | |||||
33,097,904 | |||||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 51 |
Royce Focus Trust | June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | ||||||
Materials (continued) | |||||||
Paper & Forest Products - 1.0% | |||||||
Stella-Jones |
80,000 | $ | 2,196,710 | ||||
Total (Cost $39,961,072) | 43,933,114 | ||||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | |||||||
(Cost $148,379,791) |
207,312,152 | ||||||
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT 3.3% | |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, | |||||||
0.00% dated 6/30/14, due 7/1/14, |
|||||||
maturity value $7,026,000 (collateralized |
|||||||
by obligations of various U.S. Government |
|||||||
Agencies, 1.625% due 4/30/19, valued at |
|||||||
$7,170,675) |
|||||||
(Cost $7,026,000) |
7,026,000 | ||||||
COLLATERAL RECEIVED FOR SECURITIES | |||||||
LOANED 4.4% |
|||||||
Money Market Funds | |||||||
Federated Government Obligations Fund |
|||||||
(7 day yield-0.0099%) |
|||||||
(Cost $9,442,175) |
9,442,175 | ||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 104.8% | |||||||
(Cost $164,847,966) |
223,780,327 | ||||||
LIABILITIES LESS CASH | |||||||
AND OTHER ASSETS (4.8)% |
(10,292,155 | ) | |||||
NET ASSETS 100.0% | $ | 213,488,172 | |||||
52 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Focus Trust | June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
ASSETS: | |||||
Total investments at value (including collateral on loaned securities) | $ | 216,754,327 | |||
Repurchase agreements (at cost and value) | 7,026,000 | ||||
Cash and foreign currency | 683 | ||||
Receivable for investments sold | 871,903 | ||||
Receivable for dividends and interest | 197,209 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 18,227 | ||||
Total Assets | 224,868,349 | ||||
LIABILITIES: | |||||
Payable for collateral on loaned securities | 9,442,175 | ||||
Payable for investments purchased | 1,699,758 | ||||
Payable for investment advisory fee | 172,007 | ||||
Accrued expenses | 66,237 | ||||
Total Liabilities | 11,380,177 | ||||
Net Assets | $ | 213,488,172 | |||
ANALYSIS OF NET ASSETS: | |||||
Paid-in capital - $0.001 par value per share; 22,357,291 shares outstanding (150,000,000 shares authorized) | $ | 144,755,992 | |||
Undistributed net investment income (loss) | 1,059,426 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 13,168,934 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency | 58,931,054 | ||||
Quarterly distributions | (4,427,234 | ) | |||
Net Assets (net asset value per share - $9.55) | $ | 213,488,172 | |||
Investments at identified cost (including $9,442,175 of collateral on loaned securities) |
$ | 157,821,966 | |||
Market value of loaned securities |
9,245,018 | ||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 53 |
Royce Focus Trust | Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | |
Statement of Operations |
INVESTMENT INCOME: | |||||
Income: | |||||
Dividends |
$ | 2,044,849 | |||
Foreign withholding tax |
(121,335 | ) | |||
Securities lending |
237,059 | ||||
Total income | 2,160,573 | ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Investment advisory fees |
983,312 | ||||
Stockholder reports |
38,447 | ||||
Custody and transfer agent fees |
30,821 | ||||
Directors fees |
26,391 | ||||
Professional fees |
19,308 | ||||
Administrative and office facilities |
9,836 | ||||
Other expenses |
16,440 | ||||
Total expenses | 1,124,555 | ||||
Compensating balance credits | (18 | ) | |||
Net expenses | 1,124,537 | ||||
Net investment income (loss) | 1,036,036 | ||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND FOREIGN CURRENCY: | |||||
Net realized gain (loss): | |||||
Investments |
10,831,539 | ||||
Foreign currency transactions |
(15,534 | ) | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation): | |||||
Investments and foreign currency translations |
12,175,928 | ||||
Other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency |
(2,458 | ) | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 22,989,475 | ||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS | $ | 24,025,511 |
54 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Focus Trust | ||
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
Six months ended | ||||||||||
6/30/14 | Year ended | |||||||||
(unaudited) | 12/31/13 | |||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | ||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | $ | 1,036,036 | $ | 1,106,843 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 10,816,005 | 8,575,534 | ||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency | 12,173,470 | 21,821,027 | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from investment operations | 24,025,511 | 31,503,404 | ||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS: | ||||||||||
Net investment income | | (993,984 | ) | |||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency | | (7,656,872 | ) | |||||||
Quarterly distributions 1 | (4,427,234 | ) | | |||||||
Total distributions | (4,427,234 | ) | (8,650,856 | ) | ||||||
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: | ||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 2,454,269 | 4,994,934 | ||||||||
Total capital stock transactions | 2,454,269 | 4,994,934 | ||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS | 22,052,546 | 27,847,482 | ||||||||
NET ASSETS: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period |
191,435,626 | 163,588,144 | ||||||||
End of period (including undistributed net investment income (loss) of $1,059,426 at 6/30/14 and |
||||||||||
$23,390 at 12/31/13) |
$ | 213,488,172 | $ | 191,435,626 |
1 | To be allocated to net investment income, net realized gains and/or return of capital at year end. |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 55 |
Royce Focus Trust | ||
Financial Highlights |
This table is presented to show selected data for a share of Common Stock outstanding throughout each period, and to assist stockholders in evaluating the Funds performance for the periods presented.
Six months | Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | $ | 8.68 | $ | 7.66 | $ | 7.36 | $ | 8.72 | $ | 7.16 | $ | 4.76 | |||||||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.02 | (0.01 | ) | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency |
1.03 | 1.40 | 0.81 | (0.86 | ) | 1.65 | 2.54 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total investment operations | 1.08 | 1.45 | 0.87 | (0.84 | ) | 1.64 | 2.57 | ||||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
| | (0.01 | ) | | (0.05 | ) | (0.08 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
| | (0.06 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.03 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to Preferred Stockholders |
| | (0.07 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.08 | ) | |||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS | 1.08 | 1.45 | 0.80 | (0.91 | ) | 1.56 | 2.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
| (0.05 | ) | (0.04 | ) | | | (0.00 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
| (0.35 | ) | (0.42 | ) | (0.29 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||
Return of capital |
| | | (0.12 | ) | | (0.09 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Quarterly distributions 1 |
(0.20 | ) | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to Common Stockholders | (0.20 | ) | (0.40 | ) | (0.46 | ) | (0.41 | ) | | (0.09 | ) | ||||||||||||||
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of reinvestment of distributions by Common Stockholders |
(0.01 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.04 | ) | | (0.00 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total capital stock transactions |
(0.01 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.04 | ) | | (0.00 | ) | ||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 9.55 | $ | 8.68 | $ | 7.66 | $ | 7.36 | $ | 8.72 | $ | 7.16 | |||||||||||||
MARKET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 8.55 | $ | 7.62 | $ | 6.60 | $ | 6.30 | $ | 7.57 | $ | 6.33 | |||||||||||||
TOTAL RETURN: 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Market Value | 14.97 | %3 | 21.99 | % | 12.14 | % | (11.75 | )% | 19.59 | % | 40.84 | % | |||||||||||||
Net Asset Value | 12.74 | %3 | 19.73 | % | 11.42 | % | (10.51 | )% | 21.79 | % | 53.95 | % | |||||||||||||
RATIOS BASED ON AVERAGE NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment advisory fee expense |
1.00 | %4 | 1.00 | % | 1.14 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.16 | % | |||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
0.14 | %4 | 0.17 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.18 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.26 | % | |||||||||||||
Total expenses (net) 5 | 1.14 | %4 | 1.17 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.37 | % | 1.42 | % | |||||||||||||
Expenses prior to fee waivers and balance credits | 1.14 | %4 | 1.17 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.37 | % | 1.48 | % | |||||||||||||
Expenses prior to fee waivers | 1.14 | %4 | 1.17 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.37 | % | 1.48 | % | |||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | 1.05 | %4 | 0.63 | % | 0.74 | % | 0.27 | % | (0.15 | )% | 0.49 | % | |||||||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period (in thousands) |
$ | 213,488 | $ | 191,436 | $ | 163,588 | $ | 150,856 | $ | 172,291 | $ | 141,497 | |||||||||||||
Liquidation Value of Preferred Stock, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period (in thousands) | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 13 | % | 23 | % | 16 | % | 33 | % | 36 | % | 46 | % | |||||||||||||
PREFERRED STOCK: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total shares outstanding | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per share | $ | 175.86 | $ | 197.29 | $ | 166.48 | |||||||||||||||||||
Liquidation preference per share | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average month-end market value per share | $ | 25.65 | $ | 25.38 | $ | 23.56 | |||||||||||||||||||
56 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Focus Trust | ||
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 207,312,152 | $ | | $ | | $ | 207,312,152 | |||||||||
Cash Equivalents | 9,442,175 | 7,026,000 | | 16,468,175 |
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 57 |
Royce Focus Trust | ||
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
Gross Amount of Assets and | |||||||
Liabilities in the Statements of | Collateral Received | ||||||
Assets and Liabilities 1 | and Pledged | Net Amount | |||||
Securities on Loan/Collateral on Loaned Securities | $9,442,175 | $(9,442,175) | $ |
1 | Absent an event of default, assets and liabilities are presented gross and not offset in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
58 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Royce Focus Trust | ||
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 59 |
Royce Global Value Trust | ||
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | ||||||
COMMON STOCKS 99.9% | |||||||
Argentina 0.9% | |||||||
87,700 | $ | 1,020,828 | |||||
Total (Cost $562,740) | 1,020,828 | ||||||
Australia 1.0% | |||||||
Collection House |
135,000 | 239,321 | |||||
Imdex 1 |
940,000 | 558,415 | |||||
Programmed Maintenance Services |
72,400 | 191,837 | |||||
TFS Corporation |
85,000 | 132,249 | |||||
Total (Cost $1,346,177) | 1,121,822 | ||||||
Austria 2.6% | |||||||
Mayr-Melnhof Karton |
12,300 | 1,465,457 | |||||
Semperit AG Holding |
23,000 | 1,409,352 | |||||
Total (Cost $2,482,276) | 2,874,809 | ||||||
Belgium 1.3% | |||||||
EVS Broadcast Equipment |
1,800 | 89,421 | |||||
RHJ International 1 |
145,000 | 706,237 | |||||
Van de Velde |
10,936 | 581,766 | |||||
Total (Cost $3,168,215) | 1,377,424 | ||||||
Bermuda 1.6% | |||||||
Lazard Cl. A |
30,600 | 1,577,736 | |||||
Northern Offshore |
100,000 | 167,921 | |||||
Total (Cost $1,424,333) | 1,745,657 | ||||||
Brazil 4.1% | |||||||
Brasil Brokers Participacoes |
292,500 | 464,664 | |||||
Brasil Insurance Participacoes e |
|||||||
Administracao |
17,000 | 82,711 | |||||
CETIP - Mercados Organizados |
107,000 | 1,523,037 | |||||
LPS Brasil Consultoria de Imoveis |
179,000 | 810,138 | |||||
Totvs |
63,000 | 1,083,503 | |||||
Valid Solucoes |
25,000 | 433,130 | |||||
Total (Cost $4,454,031) | 4,397,183 | ||||||
Canada 8.0% | |||||||
Agnico Eagle Mines |
20,000 | 766,000 | |||||
AirBoss of America |
16,200 | 139,523 | |||||
Alamos Gold |
38,000 | 384,256 | |||||
COM DEV International |
24,200 | 96,841 | |||||
Contrans Group Cl. A |
15,000 | 200,881 | |||||
E-L Financial |
900 | 591,256 | |||||
Franco-Nevada Corporation |
16,000 | 917,440 | |||||
Magellan Aerospace |
41,000 | 452,631 | |||||
Major Drilling Group International |
196,500 | 1,430,865 | |||||
Pan American Silver |
79,600 | 1,221,860 | |||||
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers |
50,500 | 1,244,825 | |||||
Sprott |
430,600 | 1,222,734 | |||||
Total (Cost $9,513,317) | 8,669,112 | ||||||
China 2.8% | |||||||
ANTA Sports Products |
245,000 | 387,554 | |||||
75,000 | 629,250 | ||||||
Daphne International Holdings 2 |
3,154,900 | 1,237,471 | |||||
38,300 | 541,562 | ||||||
Pacific Online |
240,000 | 132,535 | |||||
Xtep International Holdings |
213,000 | 89,868 | |||||
Total (Cost $4,439,111) | 3,018,240 | ||||||
Cyprus 0.4% | |||||||
Globaltrans Investment GDR |
42,000 | 480,900 | |||||
Total (Cost $480,518) | 480,900 | ||||||
Denmark 0.6% | |||||||
Chr Hansen |
15,000 | 631,698 | |||||
Total (Cost $548,781) | 631,698 | ||||||
Finland 1.1% | |||||||
Vaisala Cl. A |
35,000 | 1,147,816 | |||||
Total (Cost $1,414,277) | 1,147,816 | ||||||
France 7.3% | |||||||
Gaztransport Et Technigaz |
22,300 | 1,453,790 | |||||
Manutan International |
12,700 | 812,640 | |||||
Neurones |
6,200 | 123,779 | |||||
Nexity |
23,000 | 1,055,518 | |||||
Paris Orleans |
36,155 | 851,521 | |||||
4,900 | 58,575 | ||||||
Stallergenes |
19,700 | 1,518,435 | |||||
Vetoquinol |
27,200 | 1,347,523 | |||||
Virbac |
3,000 | 693,003 | |||||
Total (Cost $7,586,178) | 7,914,784 | ||||||
Germany 2.0% | |||||||
Aixtron ADR 1 |
53,300 | 774,982 | |||||
LPKF Laser & Electronics |
46,800 | 966,375 | |||||
Nemetschek |
2,300 | 222,064 | |||||
RIB Software |
8,500 | 153,054 | |||||
Total (Cost $2,621,251) | 2,116,475 | ||||||
Greece 0.5% | |||||||
Hellenic Exchanges - Athens Stock |
|||||||
Exchange |
48,000 | 545,529 | |||||
Total (Cost $504,904) | 545,529 | ||||||
Hong Kong 10.3% | |||||||
China Metal International Holdings |
430,000 | 159,785 | |||||
280,000 | 89,595 | ||||||
First Pacific |
10,000 | 11,251 | |||||
Giordano International |
226,000 | 133,260 |
60 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
June 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
SHARES | VALUE | ||||||
Hong Kong (continued) | |||||||
Goldlion Holdings |
375,000 | $ | 151,928 | ||||
Great Eagle Holdings |
43,000 | 155,902 | |||||
I.T |
500,000 | 175,475 | |||||
Le Saunda Holdings |
234,000 | 117,447 | |||||
Luk Fook Holdings (International) |
120,100 | 351,759 | |||||
Lung Kee (Bermuda) Holdings |
250,000 | 89,673 | |||||
3,069,000 | 1,544,320 | ||||||
New World Department Store China |
3,159,700 | 1,271,968 | |||||
Oriental Watch Holdings |
2,223,000 | 522,019 | |||||
Pico Far East Holdings |
6,399,400 | 1,486,235 | |||||
Regent Manner International Holdings |
5,311,000 | 1,158,081 | |||||
Sitoy Group Holdings |
170,000 | 103,311 | |||||
Television Broadcasts |
246,000 | 1,596,537 | |||||
Texwinca Holdings |
1,052,000 | 1,042,444 | |||||
Value Partners Group |
1,546,700 | 1,035,737 | |||||
Total (Cost $12,949,125) | 11,196,727 | ||||||
Indonesia 1.5% | |||||||
Selamat Sempurna |
2,562,000 | 960,615 | |||||
Supra Boga Lestari |
12,541,000 | 634,719 | |||||
Total (Cost $1,450,036) | 1,595,334 | ||||||
Israel 0.1% | |||||||
Sarine Technologies |
70,000 | 144,278 | |||||
Total (Cost $116,988) | 144,278 | ||||||
Italy 1.2% | |||||||
Datalogic |
5,800 | 73,145 | |||||
DeLonghi |
54,500 | 1,179,105 | |||||
Total (Cost $909,321) | 1,252,250 | ||||||
Japan 10.6% | |||||||
BML |
4,400 | 170,258 | |||||
C. Uyemura & Co. |
4,800 | 244,489 | |||||
EPS Corporation |
111,600 | 1,433,213 | |||||
FamilyMart |
24,700 | 1,064,266 | |||||
Freund Corporation |
72,200 | 1,008,469 | |||||
Itoki Corporation |
15,500 | 119,496 | |||||
Miraial |
39,470 | 716,893 | |||||
MISUMI Group |
11,600 | 319,127 | |||||
Moshi Moshi Hotline |
100,000 | 985,144 | |||||
Nishikawa Rubber |
8,200 | 142,461 | |||||
Nitto Kohki |
9,100 | 186,572 | |||||
Obara Group |
5,100 | 221,006 | |||||
Relo Holdings |
22,000 | 1,418,094 | |||||
Santen Pharmaceutical |
13,500 | 759,587 | |||||
Shimano |
9,600 | 1,065,140 | |||||
Tokai Corporation/Gifu |
4,400 | 121,917 | |||||
Trancom |
25,200 | 990,040 | |||||
YAMADA Consulting Group |
6,400 | 164,004 | |||||
Zuiko Corporation |
5,500 | 311,090 | |||||
Total (Cost $10,808,602) | 11,441,266 | ||||||
Luxembourg 0.5% | |||||||
Ternium ADR |
20,000 | 558,600 | |||||
Total (Cost $593,431) | 558,600 | ||||||
Malaysia 1.3% | |||||||
CB Industrial Product Holding |
550,000 | 750,233 | |||||
Media Chinese International |
2,250,000 | 672,688 | |||||
Total (Cost $1,258,408) | 1,422,921 | ||||||
Mexico 1.8% | |||||||
Bolsa Mexicana de Valores |
480,000 | 1,017,089 | |||||
Fresnillo |
65,000 | 970,021 | |||||
Total (Cost $2,021,396) | 1,987,110 | ||||||
New Zealand 0.2% | |||||||
Trade Me |
83,000 | 255,926 | |||||
Total (Cost $280,441) | 255,926 | ||||||
Norway 1.7% | |||||||
Ekornes |
45,000 | 599,745 | |||||
Oslo Bors VPS Holding |
7,600 | 90,449 | |||||
TGS-NOPEC Geophysical |
36,500 | 1,166,910 | |||||
Total (Cost $1,902,454) | 1,857,104 | ||||||
Philippines 1.0% | |||||||
GMA Holdings PDR |
775,000 | 131,386 | |||||
Universal Robina |
270,000 | 954,433 | |||||
Total (Cost $930,693) |
1,085,819 | ||||||
Singapore 2.3% | |||||||
Hour Glass (The) |
486,000 | 699,631 | |||||
Pan-United Corporation |
800,000 | 689,710 | |||||
Parkson Retail Asia |
135,000 | 86,615 | |||||
Sheng Siong Group |
200,000 | 104,259 | |||||
Silverlake Axis |
900,000 | 866,148 | |||||
Total (Cost $2,093,827) | 2,446,363 | ||||||
South Africa 5.4% | |||||||
Blue Label Telecoms |
1,010,400 | 813,260 | |||||
Coronation Fund Managers |
110,000 | 987,880 | |||||
215,000 | 74,800 | ||||||
JSE |
67,500 | 608,674 | |||||
Lewis Group |
223,000 | 1,358,759 | |||||
Metrofile Holdings |
400,000 | 180,536 | |||||
Nampak |
200,000 | 691,867 | |||||
Raubex Group |
525,300 | 1,118,763 | |||||
Total (Cost $6,563,986) | 5,834,539 | ||||||
South Korea 0.5% | |||||||
Eugene Technology |
11,100 | 208,989 | |||||
Handsome |
3,400 | 92,913 | |||||
Huvis Corporation |
22,100 | 249,002 | |||||
Total (Cost $521,804) | 550,904 | ||||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 61 |
Royce Global Value Trust | June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | ||||||
Sweden 0.1% | |||||||
Nolato Cl. B |
4,400 | $ | 100,096 | ||||
Total (Cost $110,567) | 100,096 | ||||||
Switzerland 1.1% | |||||||
Forbo Holding |
1,150 | 1,226,122 | |||||
Total (Cost $986,998) | 1,226,122 | ||||||
Taiwan 0.2% | |||||||
Makalot Industrial |
20,000 | 108,179 | |||||
Silicon Motion Technology ADR |
4,600 | 93,978 | |||||
Total (Cost $174,941) | 202,157 | ||||||
Turkey 1.3% | |||||||
Mardin Cimento Sanayii |
575,000 | 1,384,169 | |||||
Total (Cost $2,021,684) | 1,384,169 | ||||||
United Arab Emirates 0.7% | |||||||
Aramex |
880,000 | 718,798 | |||||
Total (Cost $769,812) | 718,798 | ||||||
United Kingdom 8.3% | |||||||
Ashmore Group |
232,500 | 1,472,232 | |||||
Clarkson |
23,000 | 942,725 | |||||
Consort Medical |
99,900 | 1,631,043 | |||||
E2V Technologies |
305,000 | 871,701 | |||||
Elementis |
134,000 | 596,940 | |||||
Jupiter Fund Management |
93,600 | 639,947 | |||||
Kennedy Wilson Europe Real Estate 1 |
44,000 | 828,317 | |||||
Latchways |
7,700 | 141,661 | |||||
Luxfer Holdings ADR |
4,500 | 85,275 | |||||
57,000 | 243,874 | ||||||
Rotork |
8,900 | 406,680 | |||||
112,000 | 106,381 | ||||||
Spirax-Sarco Engineering |
21,350 | 998,594 | |||||
Total (Cost $8,338,740) | 8,965,370 | ||||||
United States 15.6% | |||||||
Artisan Partners Asset Management Cl. A |
5,000 | 283,400 | |||||
Bel Fuse Cl. A |
36,672 | 901,398 | |||||
Brooks Automation |
18,100 | 194,937 | |||||
Cabot Corporation |
10,200 | 591,498 | |||||
Commercial Metals |
42,000 | 727,020 | |||||
Diebold |
31,500 | 1,265,355 | |||||
EnerSys |
11,000 | 756,690 | |||||
Expeditors International of Washington |
28,400 | 1,254,144 | |||||
Fairchild Semiconductor International 1 |
49,200 | 767,520 | |||||
Globe Specialty Metals |
50,400 | 1,047,312 | |||||
GrafTech International 1 |
58,600 | 612,956 | |||||
Greif Cl. A |
17,800 | 971,168 | |||||
Hallador Energy |
18,600 | 176,514 | |||||
Innospec |
12,457 | 537,769 | |||||
International Rectifier 1 |
25,000 | 697,500 | |||||
KBR |
20,000 | 477,000 | |||||
Nanometrics 1 |
44,500 | 812,125 | |||||
Quaker Chemical |
8,400 | 645,036 | |||||
12,000 | 796,200 | ||||||
Schnitzer Steel Industries Cl. A |
19,100 | 497,937 | |||||
Sensient Technologies |
12,100 | 674,212 | |||||
Sun Hydraulics |
15,139 | 614,643 | |||||
69,900 | 355,791 | ||||||
Tennant Company |
7,700 | 587,664 | |||||
UTi Worldwide 1 |
64,500 | 666,930 | |||||
Total (Cost $17,448,746) | 16,912,719 | ||||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | |||||||
(Cost $112,798,109) |
108,200,849 | ||||||
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT 1.4% | |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, | |||||||
0.00% dated 6/30/14, due 7/1/14, |
|||||||
maturity value $1,560,000 (collateralized |
|||||||
by obligations of various U.S. Government |
|||||||
Agencies, 1.625% due 4/30/19, valued at |
|||||||
$1,592,925) |
|||||||
(Cost $1,560,000) |
1,560,000 | ||||||
COLLATERAL RECEIVED FOR SECURITIES | |||||||
LOANED 2.2% | |||||||
Money Market Funds | |||||||
Federated Government Obligations Fund |
|||||||
(7 day yield-0.0099%) |
|||||||
(Cost $2,429,725) |
2,429,725 | ||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 103.5% | |||||||
(Cost $116,787,834) |
112,190,574 | ||||||
LIABILITIES LESS CASH | |||||||
AND OTHER ASSETS (3.5)% |
(3,804,995 | ) | |||||
NET ASSETS 100.0% | $ | 108,385,579 | |||||
62 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Global Value Trust | June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
ASSETS: | |||||
Total investments at value (including collateral on loaned securities) | $ | 110,630,574 | |||
Repurchase agreements (at cost and value) | 1,560,000 | ||||
Cash and foreign currency | 8,290 | ||||
Receivable for investments sold | 435,515 | ||||
Receivable for dividends and interest | 77,887 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 18,034 | ||||
Total Assets |
112,730,300 | ||||
LIABILITIES: | |||||
Payable for collateral on loaned securities | 2,429,725 | ||||
Payable for investments purchased | 1,747,401 | ||||
Payable for investment advisory fee | 109,630 | ||||
Accrued expenses | 57,965 | ||||
Total Liabilities |
4,344,721 | ||||
Net Assets |
$ | 108,385,579 | |||
ANALYSIS OF NET ASSETS: | |||||
Paid-in capital - $0.001 par value per share; 10,220,251 shares outstanding (150,000,000 shares authorized) |
$ | 115,972,444 | |||
Undistributed net investment income (loss) | 879,572 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | (3,869,387 | ) | |||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency | (4,597,050 | ) | |||
Net Assets (net asset value per share - $10.60) |
$ | 108,385,579 | |||
Investments at identified cost (including $2,429,725 of collateral on loaned securities) |
$ | 115,227,834 | |||
Market value of loaned securities |
2,295,446 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 63 |
Royce Global Value Trust | Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 (unaudited) | |
Statement of Operations |
INVESTMENT INCOME: | |||||
Income: | |||||
Dividends |
$ | 1,838,433 | |||
Foreign withholding tax |
(183,373 | ) | |||
Total income | 1,655,060 | ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Investment advisory fees |
642,081 | ||||
Custody and transfer agent fees |
49,694 | ||||
Stockholder reports |
19,780 | ||||
Professional fees |
15,180 | ||||
Directors fees |
13,066 | ||||
Administrative and office facilities |
5,155 | ||||
Other expenses |
13,591 | ||||
Total expenses | 758,547 | ||||
Compensating balance credits | (47 | ) | |||
Net expenses | 758,500 | ||||
Net investment income (loss) | 896,560 | ||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND FOREIGN CURRENCY: | |||||
Net realized gain (loss): | |||||
Investments |
(3,545,504 | ) | |||
Foreign currency transactions |
(49,994 | ) | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation): | |||||
Investments and foreign currency translations |
8,399,033 | ||||
Other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency |
1,786 | ||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 4,805,321 | ||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS | $ | 5,701,881 |
64 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Global Value Trust | ||
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
Six months ended | |||||||||
6/30/14 | Period ended | ||||||||
(unaudited) | 12/31/131 | ||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | |||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | $ | 896,560 | $ | (26,704 | ) | ||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | (3,595,498 | ) | (264,173 | ) | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency | 8,400,819 | 2,974,575 | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from investment operations | 5,701,881 | 2,683,698 | |||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS: | |||||||||
Net investment income | | | |||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency | | | |||||||
Total distributions | | | |||||||
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: | |||||||||
Common shares issued in spinoff from Royce Value Trust | | 100,000,000 | |||||||
Total capital stock transactions | | 100,000,000 | |||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS | 5,701,881 | 102,683,698 | |||||||
NET ASSETS: | |||||||||
Beginning of period |
102,683,698 | | |||||||
End of period (including undistributed net investment income (loss) of $879,572 at 6/30/14 and $(16,988) at 12/31/13) |
$ | 108,385,579 | $ | 102,683,698 |
1 | The Fund commenced operations on October 18, 2013. |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 65 |
Royce Global Value Trust | ||
Financial Highlights |
This table is presented to show selected data for a share outstanding throughout each period, and to assist stockholders in evaluating the Funds performance for the periods presented.
Six months ended | |||||||||
June 30, 2014 | Period ended | ||||||||
(unaudited) | 12/31/131 | ||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | $ | 10.05 | $ | 9.78 | |||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | |||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
0.09 | (0.00 | ) | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and |
|||||||||
foreign currency |
0.46 | 0.27 | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from investment operations |
0.55 | 0.27 | |||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS: | |||||||||
Net investment income |
| | |||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
| | |||||||
Total distributions |
| | |||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 10.60 | $ | 10.05 | |||||
MARKET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 9.41 | $ | 8.89 | |||||
TOTAL RETURN:2 | |||||||||
Market Value | 5.85 | %3 | (0.95 | )%3 | |||||
Net Asset Value | 5.47 | %3 | 2.76 | %3 | |||||
RATIOS BASED ON AVERAGE NET ASSETS: | |||||||||
Investment advisory fee expense |
1.25 | %4 | 1.25 | %4 | |||||
Other operating expenses |
0.23 | %4 | 0.37 | %4 | |||||
Total expenses (net) | 1.48 | %4 | 1.62 | %4 | |||||
Expenses prior to fee waivers and balance credits | 1.48 | %4 | 1.62 | %4 | |||||
Expenses prior to fee waivers | 1.48 | %4 | 1.62 | %4 | |||||
Net investment income (loss) | 1.75 | %4 | (0.13 | )%4 | |||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | |||||||||
Net Assets End of Period (in thousands) | $ | 108,386 | $ | 102,684 | |||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 21 | % | 7 | % | |||||
1 | The Fund commenced operations on October 18, 2013. |
2 | The Market Value Total Return is calculated assuming a purchase of Common Stock on the opening of the first business day and a sale on the closing of the last business day of each period. Net Asset Value Total Return is calculated on the same basis, except that the Funds net asset value is used on the purchase and sale dates instead of market value. |
3 | Not annualized |
4 | Annualized |
66 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Global Value Trust |
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) |
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds investments, as noted above. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels below: | ||
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. | ||
Level 2 other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, foreign securities that may be fair valued and repurchase agreements). The table below includes all Level 2 securities. Any Level 2 securities with values based on quoted prices for similar securities would be noted in the Schedule of Investments. |
||
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs (including last trade price before trading was suspended, or at a discount thereto for lack of marketability or otherwise, market price information regarding other securities, information received from the company and/or published documents, including SEC filings and financial statements, or other publicly available information). |
||
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. | ||
The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the Funds investments as of June 30, 2014. For a detailed breakout of common stocks by country, please refer to the Schedule of Investments. |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 108,200,849 | $ | | $ | | $ | 108,200,849 | ||||||||
Cash Equivalents | 2,429,725 | 1,560,000 | | 3,989,725 |
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 67
Royce Global Value Trust |
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
Gross Amount of Assets and | ||||||||
Liabilities in the Statements of | ||||||||
Assets and Liabilities1 | Collateral Received and Pledged | Net Amount | ||||||
Securities on Loan/Collateral on Loaned Securities | $2,429,725 | $(2,429,725) | $ | |||||
1Absent an event of default, assets and liabilities are presented gross and not offset in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
68 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders
Directors and Officers |
All Directors and Officers may be reached c/o The Royce Funds, 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10151
Charles M. Royce, Director1, President
Age: 74 | Number of Funds Overseen: 34 | Tenure: Since 1982
Non-Royce Directorships:
Director of TICC Capital Corp.
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Board of Managers of Royce & Associates, LLC (Royce), The Royce Funds investment adviser.
W. Whitney George, Director1, Vice President
Age:
56 | Number of Funds Overseen: 34 | Tenure: Since 2013
Non-Royce Directorships: None
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Managing Director and Vice
President of Royce, having been employed by Royce since October 1991.
Patricia W. Chadwick, Director
Age: 65 | Number of Funds Overseen: 34 | Tenure: Since 2009
Non-Royce Directorships:
Trustee of ING Mutual Funds and Director of Wisconsin Energy Corp.
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years: Consultant and President of Ravengate Partners LLC (since 2000).
Richard M. Galkin, Director
Age: 76 |
Number of Funds Overseen: 34 | Tenure: Since 1982
Non-Royce Directorships: None
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Private investor. Mr. Galkins prior business experience includes having served as President of Richard M. Galkin Associates, Inc., telecommunications consultants, President of Manhattan Cable Television (a subsidiary of Time, Inc.), President of Haverhills Inc. (another Time, Inc. subsidiary), President of Rhode Island Cable Television, and Senior Vice President of Satellite Television Corp. (a subsidiary of Comsat).
Stephen L. Isaacs, Director
Age: 74 |
Number of Funds Overseen: 34 | Tenure: Since 1989
Non-Royce Directorships: None
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Attorney and President of Health Policy Associates, Inc., consultants. Mr. Isaacss prior business experience includes having served as President of the Center for Health and Social Policy (from 1996 to 2012); Director of Columbia University Development Law and Policy Program and Professor at Columbia University (until August 1996).
Arthur S. Mehlman, Director
Age: 72 |
Number of Funds Overseen: 52 | Tenure: Since 2004
Non-Royce Directorships: Director/Trustee
of registered investment companies constituting the 18 Legg Mason Funds.
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Director of The League for People with Disabilities, Inc.; Director of University of Maryland Foundation (non-profits). Formerly: Director of Municipal Mortgage & Equity, LLC (from October 2004 to April 1, 2011); Director of University of Maryland College Park Foundation (non-profit) (from 1998 to 2005); Partner, KPMG LLP (international accounting firm) (from 1972 to 2002); Director of Maryland Business Roundtable for Education (from July 1984 to June 2002).
David L. Meister, Director
Age: 74 |
Number of Funds Overseen: 34 | Tenure: Since 1982
Non-Royce Directorships: None
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Consultant. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Tennis Channel (from June 2000 to March 2005). Mr. Meisters prior business experience includes having served as Chief Executive Officer of Seniorlife.com, a consultant to the communications industry, President of Financial News Network, Senior Vice President of HBO, President of Time-Life Films, and Head of Broadcasting for Major League Baseball.
G. Peter OBrien, Director
Age:
68 | Number of Funds Overseen: 52 | Tenure: Since 2001
Non-Royce Directorships:
Director/Trustee of registered investment companies constituting the 18 Legg
Mason Funds; Director of TICC Capital Corp.
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Trustee Emeritus of Colgate
University (since 2005); Board Member of Hill House, Inc. (since 1999); Formerly:
Trustee of Colgate University (from 1996 to 2005), President of Hill House, Inc.
(from 2001 to 2005) and Managing Director/Equity Capital Markets Group of Merrill
Lynch & Co. (from 1971 to 1999).
John D. Diederich, Vice President and Treasurer
Age: 62 | Tenure: Since 2001
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Chief Operating Officer, Managing Director and member of the Board of Managers of Royce; Chief Financial Officer of Royce; Director of Administration of The Royce Funds; and President of Royce Fund Services, Inc. (RFS), having been employed by Royce since April 1993.
Jack E. Fockler, Jr., Vice President
Age: 55 | Tenure: Since 1995
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Managing Director and Vice President of Royce, and Vice President of RFS, having been employed by Royce since October 1989.
Daniel A. OByrne, Vice President and
Assistant Secretary
Age: 52 | Tenure: Since 1994
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Principal and Vice President of Royce, having been employed by Royce since October 1986.
John E. Denneen, Secretary and Chief Legal
Officer
Age: 47 | Tenure: 1996-2001 and Since April 2002
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: General Counsel, Principal, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer, and Secretary of Royce; Secretary and Chief Legal Officer of The Royce Funds.
Lisa Curcio, Chief Compliance Officer
Age: 54 | Tenure: Since 2004
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Chief Compliance Officer of The Royce Funds (since October 2004) and Compliance Officer of Royce (since June 2004).
Directors will hold office until their successors have been duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal.
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 69 |
Board Approval of Investment Advisory Agreements |
At meetings held on June 4-5, 2014, the Funds respective Boards of
Directors, including all of the non-interested directors, approved the
continuance of the Investment Advisory Agreements between Royce
& Associates, LLC (R&A) and each of Royce Value Trust, Inc., Royce
Micro-Cap Trust, Inc., and Royce Focus Trust, Inc. (each, a Fund and
collectively, the Funds). In reaching these decisions, each Board
reviewed the materials provided by R&A, which included, among other
things, information prepared internally by R&A and independently by
Morningstar Associates, LLC (Morningstar) containing detailed expense
ratio and investment performance comparisons for the Funds with other
funds in their respective peer groups, information regarding the past
performance of the Funds and other registered investment companies
managed by R&A and a memorandum outlining the legal duties of each
Board prepared by independent counsel to the non-interested directors.
R&A also provided the directors with an analysis of its profitability with
respect to providing investment advisory services to each of the Funds. In
addition, each Board took into account information furnished throughout
the year at regular Board meetings, including reports on investment
performance, stockholder services, regulatory compliance, brokerage
commissions and research, and brokerage and execution products and
services provided to the Funds. Each Board also considered other matters
it deemed important to the approval process, such as allocation of Fund
brokerage commissions, soft dollar research services R&A receives and
other direct and indirect benefits to R&A and its affiliates, from their
relationship with the relevant Fund. The directors also met throughout
the year with investment advisory personnel from R&A. Each Board, in its
deliberations, recognized that, for many of the Funds stockholders, the
decision to purchase Fund shares included a decision to select R&A as the
investment adviser and that there was a strong association in the minds
of Fund stockholders between R&A and each Fund. In considering factors
relating to the approval of the continuance of the Investment Advisory
Agreements, the non-interested directors received assistance and advice
from, and met separately with, their independent counsel. While the
Investment Advisory Agreements were considered at the same Board
meetings, the Boards dealt with each agreement separately. Among other
factors, the directors considered the following:
The nature, extent and quality of services provided by R&A:
Each Board considered the following factors to be of fundamental
importance to its consideration of whether to approve the continuance
of the relevant Funds Investment Advisory Agreement: (i) R&As more
than 40 years of value investing experience and track record; (ii) the
history of long-tenured R&A portfolio managers managing the Funds;
(iii) R&As focus on mid-cap, small-cap and micro-cap value investing;
(iv) the consistency of R&As approach to managing the Funds and open-end
mutual funds over more than 40 years; (v) the integrity and high
ethical standards adhered to at R&A; (vi) R&As specialized experience in
the area of trading small- and micro-cap securities; (vii) R&As historical
ability to attract and retain portfolio management talent and (viii) R&As
focus on stockholder interests as exemplified by expansive stockholder
reporting and communications. Each Board reviewed the services that
R&A provides to each Fund, including, but not limited to, managing each
Funds investments in accordance with the stated policies of each Fund.
Each Board considered the fact that R&A provided certain administrative
services to the Funds at cost pursuant to the Administration Agreement
between the Funds and R&A which went into effect on January 1, 2008.
Each Board determined that the services to be provided to each Fund by
R&A would be the same as those that it previously provided to the relevant
Fund. The Boards also took into consideration the histories, reputations
and backgrounds of R&As portfolio managers for the Funds, finding that
these would likely have an impact on the continued success of the Funds.
Lastly, each Board noted R&As ability to attract and retain quality and
experienced personnel. The directors concluded that the investment
advisory services provided by R&A to each Fund compared favorably to
services provided by R&A to other R&A client accounts, including other
funds, in both nature and quality, and that the scope of services provided
by R&A would continue to be suitable for the Funds.
Investment performance of the Funds and R&A:
In light of R&As risk-averse approach to investing, each Board believes
that risk-adjusted performance continues to be the most appropriate
measure of each Funds investment performance. One measure of risk-adjusted
performance the Boards have historically used in their review
of the Funds performance is the Sharpe Ratio. The Sharpe Ratio is a risk-adjusted
measure of performance developed by Nobel Laureate William
Sharpe. It is calculated by dividing a funds annualized excess returns by
its annualized standard deviation to determine reward per unit of risk.
The higher the Sharpe Ratio, the better a funds historical risk-adjusted
performance. Each Board attaches primary importance to risk-adjusted
performance over relatively long periods of time, typically 3 to 10
years. Using Morningstar data, the Sharpe Ratio for Royce Value Trust,
Inc. (RVT) placed in the 4th quartile within the Small Blend category
assigned by Morningstar for the 3- and 5-year periods and the 3rd quartile
for the 10-year period ended December 31, 2013, as RVTs past use of
leverage through preferred stock created higher volatility and worse down
market performance. Using Morningstar data, the Sharpe Ratio for Royce
Micro-Cap Trust, Inc. (RMT) placed in the 3rd quartile, 2nd quartile, and
3rd quartile within the Small Blend category assigned by Morningstar for
the 3-, 5- and 10-year periods ended December 31, 2013, respectively, as
RMTs past use of leverage through preferred stock created higher volatility
and worse down market performance. Finally, using Morningstar data, the
Board noted that the concentrated portfolio and recent overweighting of
companies from the metals and mining industry for Royce Focus Trust, Inc.
(RFT) led to its bottom quartile Sharpe Ratio performance in the Mid
Cap Growth category assigned by Morningstar for the 3-year, 5-year, and
10-year periods ended December 31, 2013.
In addition to each Funds riskadjusted performance, each Board also
reviewed and considered each Funds absolute total returns, down market
performance, and long-term performance records over periods of 10 years
or longer. Each Board also considered it important to look beyond the
current snapshot of performance as of December 31, 2013 and therefore
examined extended performance histories for each Fund using monthly
rolling average return periods through March 31, 2014.
Each Board noted that R&A manages a number of funds that invest
in small-cap and micro-cap issuers, many of which were outperforming
their benchmark indexes and their competitors. Although each Board
recognized that past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future
results, it found that R&A had the necessary qualifications, experience
and track record in managing small-cap and micro-cap securities to
70 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Board Approval of Investment Advisory Agreements (continued) |
manage the relevant Fund. The directors determined that R&A continued
to be an appropriate investment adviser for the Funds and concluded
that each Funds performance supported the renewal of its Investment
Advisory Agreement.
Cost of the services provided and profits realized by R&A
from its relationship with the Funds:
Each Board considered the cost of the services provided by R&A and
profits realized by R&A from its relationship with each Fund. As part of the
analysis, each Board discussed with R&A its methodology in allocating its
costs to each Fund and concluded that its allocations were reasonable.
Each Board concluded that R&As profits were reasonable in relation to the
nature and quality of services provided.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized
as the Funds grow and whether fee levels would reflect
such economies of scale:
Each Board considered whether there have been economies of scale
in respect of the management of each Fund, whether each Fund has
appropriately benefited from any economies of scale and whether there
is potential for realization of any further economies of scale. Each Board
noted the time and effort involved in managing portfolios of small- and
micro-cap stocks and that they did not involve the same efficiencies
as do portfolios of large-cap stocks. Each Board concluded that the
current fee structure for each Fund was reasonable, that stockholders
sufficiently participated in economies of scale and that no changes were
currently necessary.
Comparison of services to be rendered and fees to be paid
to those under other investment advisory contracts, such
as contracts of the same and other investment advisers or
other clients:
Each Board reviewed the investment advisory fee paid by each Fund and
compared both the services to be rendered and the fees to be paid under
the Investment Advisory Agreements to other contracts of R&A and to
contracts of other investment advisers to registered investment companies
investing in small- and micro-cap stocks, as provided by Morningstar. In
the case of RVT, its Board noted that it had a 1.00% basic fee that is subject
to adjustment up or down (up to 0.50% in either direction) based on its
performance versus the S&P 600 SmallCap Index over a rolling period
of 60 months. The fee is charged on average net assets over that rolling
period. As a result, in a rising market, the fee will be smaller than a fee
calculated on the current years average net assets, and vice versa. The
Board determined that the performance adjustment feature continued to
serve as an appropriate incentive to R&A to manage RVT for the benefit
of its long-term common stockholders. The Board also noted that the
fee arrangement, which also includes a provision for no fee in periods
where RVTs trailing three-year performance is negative, requires R&A to
measure RVTs performance monthly against the S&P 600, an unmanaged
index. Instead of receiving a set fee regardless of its performance, R&A is
penalized for poor performance. The Board noted that RVTs net expense
ratio placed it in the 1st percentile within its Morningstar peer group for
2013. In the case of RMT, the Board noted that it also had a 1.00% basic
fee subject to adjustment up or down based on its performance versus the
Russell 2000 Index over a rolling 36 month period. The fee is charged on
average net assets over that rolling period. As a result, in a rising market,
the fee will be smaller than a fee calculated on the current years average
net assets, and vice versa. The Board determined that the performance
adjustment feature continued to serve as an incentive to R&A to manage
RMT for the benefit of its long-term common stockholders. The Board noted
that RMTs net expense ratio placed it in the 1st quartile when compared
against its Morningstar peer group for 2013. Finally, in the case of RFT,
the Board noted that its net expense ratio based on average net assets fell
within the 3rd quartile of its Morningstar-assigned open-end peer group, 8
basis points above the Morningstar peer group median.
Each Board also considered fees charged by R&A to institutional and
other clients and noted that, given the greater levels of services that
R&A provides to registered investment companies such as the Funds as
compared to other accounts, the base advisory fee for RVT and RMT and
the advisory fee for RFT compared favorably to the advisory fees charged to
those other accounts.
It was noted that no single factor was cited as determinative to the
decision of the directors. Rather, after weighing all of the considerations
and conclusions discussed above, each entire Board, including all of the
non-interested directors, approved the continuation of the existing
Investment Advisory Agreement, concluding that a contract continuation
on the existing terms was in the best interest of the stockholders of each
Fund and that each investment advisory fee rate was reasonable in relation
to the services provided.
Investment Advisory Agreement for Royce Global
Value Trust:
At a meeting held on February 16, 2011, the Board of Directors of Royce
Global Value Trust, Inc. (the Board), including all of the non-interested
directors, approved the Investment Advisory Agreement between Royce &
Associates, LLC (R&A) and Royce Global Value Trust, Inc. (RGT or the
Fund). In reaching these decisions, the Board reviewed a memorandum
from R&A which discussed the management strategies and methodologies
to be employed by R&A and the proposed advisory fee. The Board also
reviewed a memorandum outlining the Boards legal duties prepared
by independent counsel to the non-interested directors. In connection
therewith, the Board considered: (i) R&As qualifications, (ii) the general
reputation and financial resources of R&A, (iii) the reasonableness of the
management fee, (iv) the controls on the Funds operating expenses, (v)
the nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided by R&A, (vi)
the investment performance of other funds managed by R&A, (vii) the cost
to R&A of providing the services and the profit to be realized by R&A and
(viii) a comparison of the services to be rendered and the fees to be paid by
other R&A accounts both that are, and that are not, registered investment
companies. The Board also considered the materials previously provided
by R&A in connection with this meeting and to the members of the Board
at meetings of the other funds managed by R&A during the preceding
year, which included, among other things, fee information for funds with
profiles similar to those of the Fund, prepared by R&A using data provided
by Morningstar Associates, LLC and information regarding the past
performance of funds managed by R&A. The non-interested directors also
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 71 |
Board Approval of Investment Advisory Agreements (continued) |
noted that they had met with investment advisory personnel from R&A.
The Board also considered factors relating to both the selection of the
investment adviser and the approval of the advisory fee when reviewing
the proposed Investment Advisory Agreement. In considering all of the
factors relating to the approval of the Investment Advisory Agreement,
the non-interested directors received assistance and advice from, and
met separately with, their independent counsel. Among other factors, the
directors considered the following:
The nature, extent and quality of services provided by R&A:
The non-interested directors reviewed the services that R&A would provide
to the Fund, including, but not limited to, generally managing the Funds
investments in accordance with the stated policies of the Fund. The non-interested
directors also discussed with officers of R&A and Charles M.
Royce the amount of time R&A would dedicate to the Fund. Additionally,
the non-interested directors considered the services provided by R&A to
the other R&A-managed Funds.
The non-interested directors determined that the services proposed for
RGT by R&A would be similar to those being provided to the other R&A-managed
funds. They also took into consideration the favorable history,
reputation and background of Charles M. Royce, who will serve as portfolio
manager for the Fund, finding that these would likely have an impact on
the success of the Fund. Lastly, the non-interested directors noted R&As
ability to attract quality and experienced personnel. The non-interested
directors concluded that the proposed services of R&A to the Fund
compared favorably to services provided by R&A for other R&A-managed
funds and other R&A client accounts in both nature and quality. The non-interested
directors concluded that the scope of services provided by R&A
would be suitable for RGT.
Investment performance of the Fund and R&A:
Because the Fund was just being formed, the non-interested directors did
not consider the investment performance of the Fund. The non-interested
directors reviewed R&As performance for other R&A-managed funds.
The non-interested directors recognized that past performance is not an
indicator of future performance, but found that R&A had the necessary
expertise to manage RGT. The non-interested directors determined that
R&A would be an appropriate investment adviser for the Fund.
Cost of the services to be provided and profits to be
realized by R&A from the relationship with the Fund:
The non-interested directors considered the anticipated cost of the services
to be provided by R&A. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, RGT
would pay 1.25% per annum of the Funds average net assets (including
any preferred stock).
Since the Fund is being formed by a spin-off of a portion of the
assets of Royce Value Trust, Inc. (RVT), the non-interested directors
considered the fee proposed to be paid by the Fund in comparison with
the fee paid by RVT. They noted that the proposed fee to be paid by the
Fund is 0.25% higher than the 1.00% base advisory fee rate paid by RVT to
R&A. They also noted that RVT has a fee determined by performance that
causes RVTs annual fee to adjust up to 0.50% either above or below the
base advisory fee. They also noted that pursuant to the RVT investment
advisory agreement, R&A is not entitled to receive any fee for any month
when the investment performance of RVT for the rolling 36-month period
ending with such month is negative. The non-interested directors noted
that for this reason, the annual advisory fee proposed for the Fund may be
higher or lower than that paid by RVT, and that for the three years ended
December 31, 2010, the proposed fee RGT would have been higher than
that paid by RVT. The non-interested directors considered the fact that R&A
is not proposing a fulcrum fee structure for the Fund like RVTs due to the
difficulty in selecting an appropriate international smaller-cap benchmark
and the absolute return focus of the Fund. They also noted that RGT will
be able to invest all of its assets in non-U.S. securities and that RVT can
invest only 25% of its assets in such securities, as well as the fact that
the proposed fee for RGT is consistent with the fee charged by R&A for the
open-end international and global funds that it manages.
In reviewing the proposed investment advisory fee for RGT, the non-interested
directors considered the advisory fees of other similar funds,
as provided by Morningstar. The non-interested directors noted that the
proposed investment advisory fee was higher than the median of similar
funds in the Morningstar materials. The non-interested directors further
noted that providing investment advisory services to the Fund that will
invest a significant portion of its portfolio in non-U.S., small-cap securities
is expected to be considerably more labor intensive and time consuming
than providing investment advisory services to funds that invest primarily
in non-U.S., larger capitalization securities. The non-interested directors
did not consider the profitability of RGT since it was recently formed and
had no operating history.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized
as the Fund grows and whether fee levels would reflect
such economies of scale:
The non-interested directors noted that R&A did not currently expect
the Fund to grow to a size that would allow it to experience significant
economies of scale.
Comparison of services to be rendered and fees to be paid
to those under other investment advisory contracts, such
as contracts of the same and other investment advisers or
other clients:
As discussed above, the non-interested directors compared both the
services to be rendered and the fees to be paid under the Investment
Advisory Agreement to other contracts of R&A and to contracts of other
investment advisers to registered investment companies investing in
smaller-cap securities.
It was noted that no single factor was determinative to the decision
of the Board. Rather, after weighing all of the factors above, the Board,
including the non-interested directors, unanimously determined to
approve the Funds Investment Advisory Agreement.
72 | 2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Notes to Performance and Other Important Information |
The thoughts expressed in this Review and Report concerning recent market
movements and future prospects for small company stocks are solely the
opinion of Royce at June 30, 2014, and, of course, historical market trends are
not necessarily indicative of future market movements. Statements regarding
the future prospects for particular securities held in the Funds portfolios and
Royces investment intentions with respect to those securities reflect Royces
opinions as of June 30, 2014 and are subject to change at any time without
notice. There can be no assurance that securities mentioned in this Review
and Report will be included in any Royce-managed portfolio in the future.
Investments in securities of micro-cap, small-cap and/or mid-cap companies
may involve considerably more risk than investments in securities of larger-cap
companies. All publicly released material information is always disclosed
by the Funds on the website at www.roycefunds.com.
Sector weightings are determined using the Global Industry Classification
Standard (GICS). GICS was developed by, and is the exclusive property of,
Standard & Poors Financial Services LLC (S&P) and MSCI Inc. (MSCI). GICS
is the trademark of S&P and MSCI. Global Industry Classification Standard
(GICS) and GICS Direct are service marks of S&P and MSCI.
All indexes referred to are unmanaged and capitalization weighted. Each
indexs returns include net reinvested dividends and/or interest income.
Russell Investment Group is the source and owner of the trademarks, service
marks, and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Russell® is a trademark
of Russell Investment Group. The Russell 2000 Index is an index of domestic
small-cap stocks. It measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest publicly
traded U.S. companies in the Russell 3000 Index. The Russell 2500 is an index
of 2,500 smallest publicly traded U.S. companies in the Russell 3000 Index. The
Russell Microcap Index includes 1,000 of the smallest securities in the Russell
2000 Index along with the next smallest eligible securities as determined by
Russell. The Russell 1000 Index is an index of domestic large-cap stocks. It
measures the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded companies in
the Russell 3000 Index. The Russell Midcap Index measures the performance
of the mid-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes approximately
800 of the smallest securities in the Russell 1000 Index. The Russell Global
Small Cap Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of global
small-cap stocks. The Russell Global ex-U.S. Large Cap Index is an index of
global large-cap stocks, excluding the United States. The Russell Global
ex-U.S. Small Cap Index is an index of global small-cap stocks, excluding the
United States. The CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) measures market expectations
of near-term volatility conveyed by S&P 500 stock index option prices. The
S&P 500 and SmallCap 600 are indexes of U.S. large- and small-cap stocks,
respectively, selected by Standard & Poors based on market size, liquidity,
and industry grouping, among other factors. The Nasdaq Composite is an
index of the more than 3,000 common equities listed on the Nasdaq stock
exchange. The performance of an index does not represent exactly any
particular investment, as you cannot invest directly in an index. Returns for
the market indexes used in this report were based on information supplied to
Royce by Russell Investments.
The Price-Earnings, or P/E, Ratio is calculated by dividing a companys
share price by its trailing 12-month earnings-per share (EPS). The Price-to-
Book, or P/B, Ratio is calculated by dividing a companys share price by its
book value per share. The Sharpe Ratio is calculated for a specified period
by dividing a funds annualized excess returns by its annualized standard
deviation. The higher the Sharpe Ratio, the better the funds historical risk-adjusted
performance. Standard deviation is a statistical measure within
which a funds total returns have varied over time. The greater the standard
deviation, the greater a funds volatility. The Royce Funds is a service mark of
The Royce Funds. Distributor: Royce Fund Services, Inc.
| the Funds future operating results |
| the prospects of the Funds portfolio companies |
| the impact of investments that the Funds have made or may make |
| the dependence of the Funds future success on the general economy and its impact on the companies and industries in which the Funds invest, and |
| the ability of the Funds portfolio companies to achieve their objectives. |
Authorized Share Transactions
Royce Value Trust, Royce Micro-Cap Trust, Royce Focus Trust and Royce Global
Value Trust may each repurchase up to 5% of the issued and outstanding shares
of its respective common stock during the year ending December 31, 2014. Any
such repurchases would take place at then prevailing prices in the open market
or in other transactions. Common stock repurchases would be effected at a price
per share that is less than the shares then current net asset value.
Royce Value Trust, Royce Micro-Cap Trust, Royce Focus Trust and Royce
Global Value Trust are also authorized to offer their common stockholders an
opportunity to subscribe for additional shares of their common stock through
rights offerings at a price per share that may be less than the shares then
current net asset value. The timing and terms of any such offerings are within
each Boards discretion.
Proxy Voting
A copy of the policies and procedures that The Royce Funds use to determine
how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities and information regarding
how each of The Royce Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities
during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available, without
charge, on The Royce Funds website at www.roycefunds.com, by calling
(800) 221-4268 (toll-free) and on the website of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), at www.sec.gov.
Form N-Q Filing
The Funds file their complete schedules of investments with the SEC for the
first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Funds Forms
N-Q are available on the SECs website at www.sec.gov. The Royce Funds
holdings are also on the Funds website approximately 15 to 20 days after
each calendar quarter end and remain available until the next quarters
holdings are posted. The Funds Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied
at the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. To find out more
about this public service, call the SEC at (800) 732-0330. The Funds complete
schedules of investments are updated quarterly, and are available at
www.roycefunds.com.
2014 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
About The Royce Funds
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Contact Us | |||||||||||||||||||
General Information Additional Report Copies and Prospectus Inquiries (800) 221-4268 |
RIA/BD Services Fund Materials and Performance Updates (800) 33-ROYCE (337-6923) |
Broker/Dealer Services Fund Materials and Performance Updates (800) 59-ROYCE (597-6923) |
Computershare Transfer Agent and Registrar (800) 426-5523 |
||||||||||||||||
Item 2. Code(s) of Ethics. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) See Item
1.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers. Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Principal Executive and Financial Officers concluded that the Registrants Disclosure Controls and Procedures are effective based on their evaluation of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no significant changes in Registrants internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect this control subsequent to the date of the evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report.
Item 12. Exhibits. Attached hereto.
(a)(1) Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
(a)(2) Separate certifications by the Registrants Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(a)(3) Not applicable
(b) Separate certifications by the Registrants Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ROYCE FOCUS TRUST, INC.
BY: /s/ Charles M. Royce
Charles
M. Royce
President
Date: August 26, 2014
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
ROYCE FOCUS TRUST, INC. | ROYCE FOCUS TRUST, INC. | |
BY: /s/ Charles M. Royce | BY: /s/ John D. Diederich | |
Charles M. Royce | John D. Diederich | |
President | Chief Financial Officer | |
Date: August 26, 2014 | Date: August 26, 2014 | |