e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
    Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarter ended: September 26, 2009
Commission File Number: 1-14041
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Massachusetts   04-2882273
(State or other jurisdiction   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
of incorporation or organization)    
400 Wood Road, Braintree, MA 02184
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (781) 848-7100
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1.) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) (2.) has been subject to the filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.
Yes þ       No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)
Yes o     No þ
The number of shares of $.01 par value common stock outstanding as of September 26, 2009: 25,611,257
 
 

 


 

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
INDEX
         
    PAGE  
       
 
       
       
    2  
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    23  
 
       
    34  
 
       
    35  
 
       
    36  
 
       
    37  
 
       
    38  
 EX-10.Z 2005 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
 EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 EX-32.2 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

1


Table of Contents

ITEM 1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited in thousands, except per share data)
                                 
    Three months ended     Six months ended  
    September 26,     September 27,     September 26,     September 27,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Net revenues
  $ 157,070     $ 145,919     $ 311,158     $ 290,035  
Cost of goods sold
    76,103       71,230       147,248       142,309  
 
                       
Gross profit
    80,967       74,689       163,910       147,726  
 
                       
 
                               
Operating expenses:
                               
 
                               
Research, development and engineering
    6,475       5,217       13,252       11,061  
Selling, general and administrative
    47,469       45,863       97,308       93,722  
 
                       
Total operating expenses
    53,944       51,080       110,560       104,783  
 
                       
 
                               
Operating income
    27,023       23,609       53,350       42,943  
Interest expense
    (255 )     (16 )     (463 )     (40 )
Interest income
    103       506       253       1,160  
Other expense, net
    (801 )     (1,290 )     (1,135 )     (915 )
 
                       
Income before provision for income taxes
    26,070       22,809       52,005       43,148  
Provision for income taxes
    8,020       8,002       15,882       14,000  
 
                       
 
                               
Net income
  $ 18,050     $ 14,807     $ 36,123     $ 29,148  
 
                       
 
                               
Basic income per common share
                               
Net income
  $ 0.70     $ 0.59     $ 1.41     $ 1.15  
 
                               
Income per common share assuming dilution
                               
Net income
  $ 0.69     $ 0.57     $ 1.37     $ 1.11  
 
                               
Weighted average shares outstanding
                               
Basic
    25,685       25,038       25,671       25,323  
Diluted
    26,321       25,917       26,273       26,218  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

2


Table of Contents

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share data)
                 
    September 26, 2009     March 28, 2009  
    (Unaudited)          
ASSETS
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 178,322     $ 156,721  
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $2,968 at September 26, 2009 and $2,312 at March 28, 2009
    118,668       113,598  
Inventories, net
    77,136       76,522  
Deferred tax asset, net
    10,485       7,190  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    21,514       28,362  
 
           
Total current assets
    406,125       382,393  
Property, plant and equipment:
               
Land, building and building improvements
    45,009       42,540  
Plant equipment and machinery
    109,384       108,572  
Office equipment and information technology
    71,242       52,461  
Haemonetics equipment
    208,904       194,290  
 
           
Total property, plant and equipment
    434,539       397,863  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    (281,585 )     (260,056 )
 
           
Net property, plant and equipment
    152,954       137,807  
Other assets:
               
Other intangibles, less amortization of $29,202 at September 26, 2009 and $25,508 at March 28, 2009
    74,872       65,261  
Goodwill
    72,157       56,426  
Deferred tax asset, long term
    2,551       3,007  
Other long-term assets
    5,635       4,799  
 
           
Total other assets
    155,215       129,493  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 714,294     $ 649,693  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt
  $ 15,181     $ 695  
Accounts payable
    24,804       20,652  
Accrued payroll and related costs
    24,197       30,771  
Accrued income taxes
    7,135       2,833  
Deferred tax liability
    111        
Other liabilities
    41,395       37,912  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    112,823       92,863  
 
               
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
    4,974       5,343  
Long-term deferred tax liability
    3,702       3,129  
Other long-term liabilities
    13,363       8,474  
 
               
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
               
Stockholders’ equity:
               
 
               
Common stock, $0.01 par value; Authorized - 150,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding— 25,611,257 shares at September 26, 2009 and 25,622,449 shares at March 28, 2009
    256       256  
Additional paid-in capital
    235,792       226,829  
Retained earnings
    339,323       309,516  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    4,061       3,283  
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    579,432       539,884  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 714,294     $ 649,693  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited in thousands)
                                                         
                                    Accumulated              
                    Additional             Other     Total        
    Common Stock     Paid-in     Retained     Comprehensive     Stockholders’     Comprehensive  
    Shares     $’s     Capital     Earnings     Income / (Loss)     Equity     Income  
Balance, March 28, 2009
    25,622     $ 256     $ 226,829     $ 309,516     $ 3,283     $ 539,884          
             
 
                                                       
Employee stock purchase plan
    33             1,484                   1,484          
Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit
    95             3,750                   3,750          
Shares repurchased
    (140 )           (1,263 )     (6,316 )           (7,579 )        
Stock Compensation expense
                4,992                   4,992          
Net income
                      36,123             36,123     $ 36,123  
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                            6,055       6,055       6,055  
Unrealized loss on hedges, net of tax
                            (4,263 )     (4,263 )     (4,263 )
Reclassification of hedge gain to earnings, net of tax
                            (1,014 )     (1,014 )     (1,014 )
 
                                                     
Comprehensive income
                                      $ 36,901  
             
 
                                                       
Balance, September 26, 2009
    25,611     $ 256     $ 235,792     $ 339,323     $ 4,061     $ 579,432          
             
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

HAEMONETICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited in thousands)
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    September 26,     September 27,  
    2009     2008  
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
               
Net income
  $ 36,123     $ 29,148  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Non cash items:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    20,699       18,083  
Stock compensation expense
    4,992       4,542  
Loss on sales of plant, property and equipment
    147       1,102  
Unrealized (gain)/loss from hedging activities
    (2,145 )     3,706  
Accretion of interest expense on contingent consideration
    408        
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Decrease/(increase) in accounts receivable, net
    1,786       (7,350 )
Decrease/(increase) in inventories
    2,071       (7,847 )
Decrease/(increase) in prepaid income taxes
    5,907       (267 )
Increase in other assets and other long-term liabilities
    (1,204 )     (11,105 )
Tax benefit of exercise of stock options
    177       2,131  
(Decrease)/increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses
    (7,482 )     9,634  
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    61,479       41,777  
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
               
Capital expenditures on property, plant and equipment
    (32,880 )     (28,775 )
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
    383       2,497  
Acquisition of SEBRA
    (12,845 )      
Acquisition of Neoteric
    (6,613 )      
Acquisition of Medicell
    (307 )     (2,459 )
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (52,261 )     (28,737 )
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
               
Payments on long-term real estate mortgage
    (369 )     (340 )
Net increase in short-term revolving credit agreements
    13,578       2,100  
Employee stock purchase plan
    1,484       1,396  
Exercise of stock options
    3,388       17,598  
Excess tax benefit on exercise of stock options
    157       5,419  
Share repurchase
    (6,331 )     (59,998 )
 
           
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities
    11,907       (33,825 )
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
    476       (1,437 )
 
           
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
    21,601       (22,222 )
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year
    156,721       133,553  
 
           
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
  $ 178,322     $ 111,331  
 
           
 
               
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities:
               
Transfers from inventory to fixed assets for placements of Haemonetics equipment
  $ 2,809     $ 4,984  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
               
Interest paid
  $ 283     $ 275  
 
           
Income taxes paid
  $ 6,360     $ 7,394  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

5


Table of Contents

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of our management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications were made to prior year balances to conform with the presentation of the financial statements for the six months ended September 26, 2009. Operating results for the six month period ended September 26, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending April 3, 2010, or any other interim period. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2009.
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to the last day of March. Fiscal year 2010 includes 53 weeks with each of the first three quarters having 13 weeks and the fourth quarter having 14 weeks. Fiscal year 2009 included 52 weeks with all four quarters having 13 weeks.
Revenue Recognition
Our revenue recognition policy is to recognize revenues from product sales, software and services in accordance with ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition (formerly known as SAB No. 104, Revenue Recognition, and as EITF 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables), and ASC Topic 985-605, Software (formerly known as Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended). These standards require that revenues are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, product delivery, including customer acceptance, has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. When more than one element such as equipment, disposables and services are contained in a single arrangement, we allocate revenue between the elements based on each element’s relative fair value, provided that each element meets the criteria for treatment as a separate unit of accounting. An item is considered a separate unit of accounting if it has value to the customer on a stand alone basis and there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered items. The fair value of the undelivered elements is determined by the price charged when the element is sold separately, or in cases when the item is not sold separately, by using vendor specific objective evidenced under ASC Topic 985-605 or other objective evidence as defined in ASC Topic 605.
Product Revenues
Product sales consist of the sale of our equipment devices and the related disposables used with these devices. On product sales to end customers, revenue is recognized when both the title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer as determined by the shipping terms and all obligations have been completed. Examples of common post delivery obligations are installation and training. For product sales to distributors, we recognize revenue for both equipment and disposables upon shipment of these products to our distributors. Our standard contracts with our distributors state that title to the equipment passes to the distributors at point of shipment to a distributor’s location. The distributors are responsible for shipment to the end customer along with installation, training and acceptance of the equipment by the end customer. All shipments to distributors are at contract prices and payment is not contingent upon resale of the product.
Software Solutions Revenues
At this time, our software solutions business principally provides support to our plasma and blood collection customers and hospitals. Through our Haemonetics Software Solutions unit, we provide information technology platforms and technical support for donor recruitment, blood and plasma testing laboratories, and for efficient and compliant operations of blood and plasma collection centers. For plasma customers, we also provide information technology platforms for managing distribution of plasma from collection centers to plasma fractionation facilities. Software license revenues are generally billed periodically, monthly or quarterly and recognized for the period for which the service is provided. Our software solutions business model includes the provision of services, including in some instances hosting, technical support, and maintenance, for the payment of periodic, monthly or quarterly fees. We recognize these fees and charges as earned, typically as these services are provided during the contract period.

6


Table of Contents

Subsequent Events
The company has evaluated subsequent events through November 4, 2009 (the date the unaudited financial statements were issued) and has determined that there were no recognized and no non-recognized events to be disclosed.
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, an amendment to FASB ASC topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and Update No. 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, an amendment to FASB ASC subtopic 985-605, Software — Revenue Recognition, (the “Updates”). The Updates provide guidance on arrangements that include software elements, including tangible products that have software components that are essential to the functionality of the tangible product and will no longer be within the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance, and software-enabled products that will now be subject to other relevant revenue recognition guidance. The Updates provide authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables that are outside the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance. Under the new guidance, when vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence for deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined, a best estimate of the selling price is required to separate deliverables and allocate arrangement consideration using the relative selling price method. The Updates also include new disclosure requirements on how the application of the relative selling price method affects the timing and amount of revenue recognition. The Updates must be adopted in the same period using the same transition method and are effective prospectively, with retrospective adoption permitted, for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is also permitted; however, early adoption during an interim period requires retrospective application from the beginning of the fiscal year. The Company is currently assessing the timing and method of adoption, as well as the possible impact of this guidance on its financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued requirements under FASB Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. FASB Statement No. 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This statement became effective during our second quarter of fiscal year 2010 and its impact is reflected in our financial position and results of operation for the six months ended September 26, 2009.
Under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (formerly known as FASB Statement No. 141(R), Business Combinations), the FASB requires that all business combinations use the acquisition method (formerly the purchase method) and that an acquiring entity be identified in all business combinations. ASC Topic 805 also requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. This statement became effective for our fiscal year 2010 and its impact is reflected in our financial position and results of operations for the six months ended September 26, 2009. The Company’s acquisition of L’Attitude Medical Systems, Inc. (“Neoteric”) and asset acquisition of the blood collection and processing business unit (“SEBRA”) of Engineering and Research Associates, Inc. during the first six months of fiscal year 2010 were both accounted for in accordance to the requirements of ASC Topic 805 — see Note 9.

7


Table of Contents

3. EARNINGS PER SHARE (“EPS”)
The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by weighted average shares outstanding. Diluted EPS includes the effect of potentially dilutive common shares.
                 
    For the Three Months Ended  
    September 26,     September 27,  
    2009     2008  
    (in thousands, except per share amounts)  
Basic EPS
               
Net income
  $ 18,050     $ 14,807  
 
               
Weighted average shares
    25,685       25,038  
 
           
Basic income per share
  $ 0.70     $ 0.59  
 
           
 
               
Diluted EPS
               
Net income
  $ 18,050     $ 14,807  
 
               
Basic weighted average shares
    25,685       25,038  
Net effect of common stock equivalents
    636       879  
 
           
Diluted weighted average shares
    26,321       25,917  
 
               
Diluted income per share
  $ 0.69     $ 0.57  
 
           
                 
    For the Six Months Ended  
    September 26,     September 27,  
    2009     2008  
    (in thousands, except per share amounts)  
Basic EPS
               
Net income
  $ 36,123     $ 29,148  
 
               
Weighted average shares
    25,671       25,323  
 
           
Basic income per share
  $ 1.41     $ 1.15  
 
           
 
               
Diluted EPS
               
Net income
  $ 36,123     $ 29,148  
 
               
Basic weighted average shares
    25,671       25,323  
Net effect of common stock equivalents
    601       895  
 
           
Diluted weighted average shares
    26,273       26,218  
 
               
Diluted income per share
  $ 1.37     $ 1.11  
 
           
Weighted average shares outstanding, assuming dilution, excludes the impact of 0.8 million stock options for both the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2010 and 0.4 million stock options for both the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2009 because these securities were anti-dilutive during the noted periods.
4. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based compensation expense of $5.0 and $4.5 million was recognized for the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively. The related income tax benefit recognized was $1.5 and $1.3 million for the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively. We recognize stock-based compensation on a straight line basis.

8


Table of Contents

For a more detailed description of our stock-based compensation plans, see Note 11—Capital Stock to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 28, 2009. Our stock-based compensation plans currently consist of stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and an employee stock purchase plan. Options become exercisable in the manner specified by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. All options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units granted to employees in the six months ended September 26, 2009 vest over a four year period of time and the options expire not more than 7 years from the date of grant.
Cash flows relating to the benefits of tax deductions in excess of compensation cost recognized are reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow. This excess tax benefit was $0.1 million and $4.1 million for the three months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively, and $0.2 million and $5.4 million for the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively.
A summary of information related to stock options is as follows:
                                 
            Weighted     Weighted     Aggregate  
            Average     Average     Intrinsic  
    Options     Exercise     Remaining     Value  
    Outstanding     Price     Life (Years)     ($000’s)  
Outstanding at March 28, 2009
    3,054,724     $ 42.54       4.23     $ 37,601  
 
                           
 
                               
Granted
    32,845       55.37                  
Exercised
    (32,462 )     28.00                  
Forfeited
    (6,716 )     49.75                  
 
                           
 
                               
Outstanding at June 27, 2009
    3,048,391     $ 42.82       4.03     $ 43,917  
 
                           
 
                               
Granted
    52,594       59.27                  
Exercised
    (62,728 )     39.13                  
Forfeited
    (24,516 )     51.83                  
 
                           
 
                               
Outstanding at September 26, 2009
    3,013,741     $ 43.11       3.75     $ 38,595  
 
                           
 
                               
Exercisable at September 26, 2009
    2,152,545     $ 39.05       3.13     $ 36,133  
 
                           
 
                               
Vested or expected to vest at September 26, 2009
    2,830,088     $ 42.48       3.66     $ 38,006  
 
                           
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three month periods ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, was $1.0 million and $16.4 million, respectively, and $1.6 million and $22.6 million for the six month periods ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively.
As of September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, there was $9.1 million and $11.0 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non vested stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.3 years and 1.9 years, respectively. The total fair value of shares fully vested during the six months ended September 26, 2009 was $18.0 million and during the six months ended September 27, 2008 was $26.6 million.

9


Table of Contents

The weighted average fair value for our options granted in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 and 2009 was $17.54 and $18.07, respectively. The assumptions utilized for option grants during the periods presented are as follows:
                 
    Six Months Ended
    September 26,   September 27,
    2009   2008
Stock Options Black-Scholes assumptions (weighted average):
               
Volatility
    28.29 %     29.07 %
Expected life (years)
    4.9       4.9  
Risk-free interest rate
    2.71 %     3.26 %
Dividend yield
    0.00 %     0.00 %
As of September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, there was $0.2 and $0.4 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non vested restricted stock awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years and 2.2 years, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock awards vested was $0.0 million for the six months ended September 26, 2009 and $0.1 million for the six months ended September 27, 2008.
A summary of information related to restricted stock awards is as follows:
                 
            Weighted  
            Average  
            Grant Date  
    Shares     Fair Value  
Nonvested at March 28, 2009
    10,956     $ 50.97  
 
           
 
               
Released
    (2,500 )   $ 48.09  
 
           
 
               
Nonvested at June 27, 2009
    8,456     $ 51.82  
 
           
 
               
Canceled
    (3,456 )   $ 57.22  
 
           
 
               
Nonvested at September 26, 2009
    5,000     $ 48.09  
 
           
As of September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, there was $3.6 million and $2.1 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non vested restricted stock units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.3 years and 3.0 years, respectively. The total fair value of shares fully vested was $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively.

10


Table of Contents

A summary of information related to restricted stock units is as follows:
                         
            Weighted          
            Average          
            Market Value          
    Shares     at Grant Date          
Nonvested at March 28, 2009
    102,302     $ 53.48  
 
           
 
               
Granted
    2,501     $ 54.09  
Vested
    (289 )   $ 52.69  
Forfeited
    (598 )   $ 52.66  
 
           
 
               
Nonvested at June 27, 2009
    103,916     $ 53.50  
 
           
 
               
Granted
    6,716     $ 58.98  
Vested
    (3,324 )   $ 59.11  
Forfeited
    (2,639 )   $ 51.89  
 
           
 
               
Nonvested at September 26, 2009
    104,669     $ 53.88  
 
           
As of September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, there was $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) shares. That cost is expected to be recognized over the remainder of fiscal year 2010 and fiscal year 2009, respectively.
During the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, there were 33,183 and 31,474 shares purchased under the ESPP, respectively. They were purchased at $43.89 and $44.35 per share under the ESPP, respectively.
5. ACCOUNTING FOR SHIPPING AND HANDLING COSTS
Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of goods sold with the exception of $5.9 million and $4.4 million for the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively, that are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses. Freight is classified in cost of goods sold when the customer is charged for freight and in selling, general and administration when the customer is not explicitly charged for freight.
6. PRODUCT WARRANTIES
We provide a warranty on parts and labor for one year after the sale and installation of each device. We also warrant our disposables products through their use or expiration. We estimate our potential warranty expense based on our historical warranty experience, and we periodically assess the adequacy of our warranty accrual and make adjustments as necessary.

11


Table of Contents

                 
    For the three months ended  
    September 26,     September 27,  
    2009     2008  
    (in thousands)  
Warranty accrual as of the beginning of the period
  $ 1,875     $ 960  
Warranty provision
    242       341  
Warranty spending
    (392 )     (309 )
 
           
Warranty accrual as of the end of the period
  $ 1,725     $ 992  
 
           
                 
    For the six months ended  
    September 26,     September 27,  
    2009     2008  
    (in thousands)  
Warranty accrual as of the beginning of the period
  $ 1,835     $ 929  
Warranty provision
    633       876  
Warranty spending
    (743 )     (813 )
 
           
Warranty accrual as of the end of the period
  $ 1,725     $ 992  
 
           
7. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income is the total of net income and all other non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity. Other non-owner changes are primarily foreign currency translation, the change in our net minimum pension liability, and the changes in fair value of the effective portion of our outstanding cash flow hedge contracts.
A summary of the components of other comprehensive income is as follows:
                 
    For the three months ended  
(In thousands)   September 26, 2009     September 27, 2008  
Net income
  $ 18,050     $ 14,807  
 
           
 
               
Other comprehensive income:
               
Foreign currency translation
    3,424       (4,153 )
Unrealized (loss)/gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax
    (3,255 )     1,783  
Reclassifications into earnings of cash flow hedge losses, net of tax
    106       1,345  
 
           
Total comprehensive income
  $ 18,325     $ 13,782  
 
           
                 
    For the six months ended  
(In thousands)   September 26, 2009     September 27, 2008  
Net income
  $ 36,123     $ 29,148  
 
           
 
               
Other comprehensive income:
               
Foreign currency translation
    6,055       (5,655 )
Unrealized (loss)/gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax
    (4,263 )     4,690  
Reclassifications into earnings of cash flow hedge (gains)/losses, net of tax
    (1,014 )     3,938  
 
           
Total comprehensive income
  $ 36,901     $ 32,121  
 
           
8. INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and include the cost of material, labor and manufacturing overhead. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out method.

12


Table of Contents

                 
    September 26, 2009     March 28, 2009  
    (in thousands)  
Raw materials
  $ 25,993     $ 23,778  
Work-in-process
    4,902       8,732  
Finished goods
    46,241       44,012  
 
           
 
  $ 77,136     $ 76,522  
 
           

13


Table of Contents

9. GOODWILL, OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, AND ACQUISITIONS
Goodwill
The change in the carrying amount of our goodwill during the six months ended September 26, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
         
Carrying amount as of March 28, 2009
  $ 56,426  
SEBRA (a)
    5,272  
L’Attitude Medical Systems Inc. (Neoteric) (b)
    8,409  
Altivation Software Inc. (c)
    523  
Medicell Ltd. (d)
    583  
Effect of change in rates used for translation
    944  
 
     
Carrying amount as of September 26, 2009
  $ 72,157  
 
     
 
(a)   A description of the acquisition of SEBRA®, which occurred on September 4, 2009, is included later in this footnote.
 
(b)   A description of the acquisition of L’Attitude Medical Systems, Inc. (“Neoteric”), which occurred on April 16, 2009, is included later in this footnote.
 
(c)   See Note 3, Acquisitions, in our fiscal year 2009 Form 10-K for a full description of the acquisition of Altivation Software (“Altivation”), which occurred on March 27, 2009.
 
(d)   See Note 3, Acqusitions, in our fiscal year 2009 Form 10-K for a full description of the acquisition of Medicell Ltd. (“Medicell”), which occurred on April 4, 2008.
Other Intangible Assets
                         
                    Weighted  
    Gross Carrying     Accumulated     Average  
    Amount     Amortization     Useful Life  
As of September 26, 2009   (in thousands)     (in thousands)     (in years)  
Patents
  $ 12,107     $ 5,455       11  
Capitalized software
    21,487       749       6  
Other technology
    39,016       12,729       10  
Customer contracts and related relationships
    30,350       9,859       12  
Trade names
    1,114       410       7  
 
                   
Total intangibles
  $ 104,074     $ 29,202       10  
 
                   
                         
                  Weighted  
    Gross Carrying     Accumulated     Average  
    Amount     Amortization     Useful Life  
As of March 28, 2009   (in thousands)     (in thousands)     (in years)  
Patents
  $ 12,008     $ 4,945       11  
Capitalized software
    18,994       572       6  
Other technology
    28,784       11,501       10  
Customer contracts and related relationships
    29,886       8,240       12  
Trade names
    1,097       250       7  
 
                   
Total intangibles
  $ 90,769     $ 25,508       11  
 
                   
On September 4, 2009, Haemonetics acquired the assets of the blood collection and processing business unit (“SEBRA”) of Engineering and Research Associates, Inc., a leading provider of blood and medical manufacturing technologies. SEBRA products, which include tubing sealers, blood shakers, sterile connection systems, mobile lounges and ancillary products used

14


Table of Contents

in blood collection and processing, complement Haemonetics’ portfolio and add even greater depth to Haemonetics Blood Bank and Plasma product lines. The acquisition will give Haemonetics entry into the whole blood collection market, an important strategic position as Haemonetics prepares to enter this market with an automated whole blood collection system in early calendar 2011. The purchase price was $12.8 million.
The purchase price was allocated to other intangible assets of $5.3 million, trade accounts receivables of $1.0 million, inventory of $1.2 million, and goodwill of $5.3 million. The Company is still in the process of evaluating the information necessary to determine the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired. The preliminary purchase price allocation will be finalized once the Company has completed this evaluation, which will occur not later than one year from the acquisition date. The results of the SEBRA operations are included in our consolidated results for periods after the acquisition.
On April 16, 2009, Haemonetics acquired the outstanding shares of L’Attitude Medical Systems Inc. (“Neoteric”). Neoteric is a medical information management company that markets a full end-to-end suite of products to track, allocate, release, and dispense hospital blood units while controlling inventory and recording the disposition of blood. The acquisition strategically broadened Haemonetics’ blood management solutions. The purchase price was $6.7 million plus contingent consideration.
The contingent consideration is based upon annual revenue growth for the three years following the acquisition, at established profitability thresholds. Using projected revenues for fiscal years 2010, 2011, and 2012, an analysis was performed that probability weighted three performance outcomes for the noted years. The performance outcomes were then discounted using a discount rate commensurate with the risks associated with Neoteric to arrive at a recorded $5.0 million fair value for the contingent consideration.
The contingent consideration is based upon future operating performance and is not contractually limited. The purchase price was allocated to other intangible assets of $5.0 million, deferred tax liabilities of $1.6 million, and goodwill of $8.4 million. The Company is still in the process of evaluating the information necessary to determine the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired. The preliminary purchase price allocation will be finalized once the Company has completed this evaluation, which will occur not later than one year from the acquisition date. The results of the Neoteric operations are included in our consolidated results for periods after the acquisition and $0.4 million of interest expense has been recorded relating to the accretion of the noted contingent consideration for the first six months of fiscal year 2010.
In addition to the acquisition of SEBRA and Neoteric discussed above, changes to the net carrying value of our intangible assets from March 28, 2009 to September 26, 2009, reflect the capitalization of software costs associated with our devices and software products (see Note 16), amortization expense and the effect of exchange rate changes in the translation of our intangible assets held by our international subsidiaries.
Amortization expense for amortized intangible assets was $1.8 million and $1.5 million for the three months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively, and $3.6 and $3.0 for the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively. Annual amortization expense is expected to approximate $8.1 million for fiscal year 2010, $8.1 million for fiscal year 2011, $7.6 million for fiscal year 2012, $7.5 million for fiscal year 2013, and $8.1 million for fiscal year 2014.
10. DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
We manufacture, market and sell our products globally. Approximately 52% of our sales are generated outside the U.S. in local currencies. We also incur certain manufacturing, marketing and selling costs in international markets in local currency. Accordingly, our earnings and cash flows are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar, our reporting currency.
We have a program in place that is designed to mitigate our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. That program includes the use of derivative financial instruments to minimize for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results from changes in foreign exchange rates. We utilize forward foreign currency contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from transactions denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen and the Euro, and to lesser extent the Great British Pound Sterling and the Canadian Dollar. This does not eliminate the volatility of foreign exchange rates, but because we generally enter into forward contracts one year out, rates are fixed for a one-year period, thereby facilitating financial planning and resource allocation.

15


Table of Contents

Designated Foreign Currency Hedge Contracts
All of our designated foreign currency hedge contracts as of September 26, 2009 and March 28, 2009 were cash flow hedges under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (formerly known as FASB Statement No. 133). We record the effective portion of any change in the fair value of designated foreign currency hedge contracts in other comprehensive income (OCI) in the Statement of Stockholders’ Equity until the related third-party transaction occurs. Once the related third-party transaction occurs, we reclassify the effective portion of any related gain or loss on the designated foreign currency hedge contracts to earnings. In the event the hedged forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, we would reclassify the amount of any gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge to earnings at that time. We had designated foreign currency hedge contracts outstanding in the contract amount of $131.6 million as of September 26, 2009 and $117.4 million as of March 28, 2009.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, we recognized net gains of $1.0 million in earnings on our cash flow hedges. All currency cash flow hedges outstanding as of September 26, 2009 mature within twelve months. For the quarter ended September 26, 2009, $4.3 million of losses, net of tax, were recorded in OCI to recognize the effective portion of the fair value of any designated foreign currency hedge contracts that are, or previously were, designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges, as compared to net gains of $4.7 million as of September 27, 2008. For the quarter ended September 26, 2009, $4.3 million of losses, net of tax, may be reclassified to earnings within the next twelve months.
Non-designated Foreign Currency Contracts
We manage our exposure to changes in foreign currency on a consolidated basis to take advantage of offsetting transactions and balances. We use currency forward contracts as a part of our strategy to manage exposure related to foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. These currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges under ASC Topic 815. These forward contracts are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded to earnings; and are entered into for periods consistent with currency transaction exposures, generally one month. We had non-designated foreign currency hedge contracts under Statement No. 133 outstanding in the contract amount of $37.8 million as of September 26, 2009 and $51.6 million as of March 28, 2009.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The following table presents the effect of our derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges and those not designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815 in our consolidated statement of income for the six months ended September 26, 2009.
                                         
            Amount of Gain                      
    Amount of Loss     Reclassified             Amount        
    Recognized     from OCI into     Location in     Excluded from     Location in  
    in OCI     Earnings     Statement of     Effectiveness     Statement of  
Derivative Instruments   (Effective Portion)     (Effective Portion)     Operations     Testing (*)     Operations  
(in thousands)                                        
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts
  $ (4,263 )   $ 1,014     Net revenues   $ 410     Other income
Non-designated foreign currency hedge contracts
                        (2,385 )   Other expense
 
                                     
                             
 
  $ (4,263 )   $ 1,014             $ (1,975 )        
 
                                     
                             
 
(*)   We exclude the difference between the spot rate and hedge forward rate from our effectiveness testing.
We did not have fair value hedges or net investment hedges outstanding as of September 26, 2009 or March 28, 2009.
ASC Topic 815 requires all derivative instruments to be recognized at their fair values as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet. We determine the fair value of our derivative instruments using the framework prescribed by ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly known as FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements), by considering the estimated amount we would receive or pay to sell or transfer these instruments at the reporting date and by taking into account current interest rates, currency exchange rates, the creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets, and our creditworthiness for liabilities. In certain instances, we may utilize financial models to measure fair value. Generally, we use inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; other observable inputs for the asset or liability; and inputs derived principally

16


Table of Contents

from, or corroborated by, observable market data by correlation or other means. As of September 26, 2009, we have classified our derivative assets and liabilities within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy prescribed by ASC Topic 815, as discussed below, because these observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of our derivative instruments.
The following tables present the fair value of our derivative instruments as they appear in our consolidated balance sheets as of September 26, 2009 by type of contract and whether it is a qualifying hedge under Statement No. 133.
                         
    Location in     Balance as of     Balance as of  
(in thousands)   Balance Sheet     September 26, 2009     March 28, 2009  
Derivative Assets:
                       
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts
  Other current assets   $ 1,494     $ 3,936  
 
                   
 
          $ 1,494     $ 3,936  
 
                   
 
                       
Derivative Liabilities:
                       
Designated foreign currency hedge contracts
  Other accrued liabilities   $ 7,099     $ 2,914  
 
                   
 
          $ 7,099     $ 2,914  
 
                   
Other Fair Value Measurements
We adopted ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly known as FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurement) as of March 30, 2008. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC Topic 820 does not require any new fair value measurements; rather, it applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. In accordance with ASC Topic 820, for the six months ended September 26, 2009, we applied the requirements under ASC Topic 820 to our non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities. As we did not have an impairment of any non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities, there was no disclosure required relating to our non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities.
On a recurring basis, we measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value, including our money market funds, foreign currency derivative contracts, and contingent consideration. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. We base fair value upon quoted market prices, where available. Where quoted market prices or other observable inputs are not available, we apply valuation techniques to estimate fair value.
ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The categorization of assets and liabilities within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement of fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are defined as follows:
    Level 1 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities.
 
    Level 2 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are other observable inputs, including quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities and market-corroborated inputs.
 
    Level 3 — Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable inputs based on management’s best estimate of inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date, including assumptions about risk.
Our money market funds carried at fair value are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.
We recognize all derivative financial instruments in our consolidated financial statements at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (formerly known as FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities). We determine the fair value of these instruments using the framework prescribed by ASC Topic 820 by considering the estimated amount we would receive or pay to terminate these agreements at the reporting date and by taking into account current spot rates, the creditworthiness of the counterparty for assets, and our

17


Table of Contents

creditworthiness for liabilities. We have classified our foreign currency hedge contracts within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because these observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of our derivative instruments. For the quarter ended September 26, 2009, we have classified our other liabilities — contingent consideration relating to our acquisition of Neoteric within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because the value is determined using significant unobservable inputs.
Fair Value Measured on a Recurring Basis
Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of the following as of September 26, 2009:
                                 
    Quoted Market     Significant Other     Significant        
    Prices for     Observable     Unobservable        
    Identical Assets     Inputs     Inputs        
(in thousands)   (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total  
Assets
                               
Money market funds
  $ 152,376     $     $     $ 152,376  
Forward currency exchange contracts
          1,494             1,494  
     
 
  $ 152,376     $ 1,494     $     $ 153,870  
     
 
                               
Liabilities
                               
Forward currency exchange contracts
  $     $ 7,099     $     $ 7,099  
Other liabilities — contingent consideration
                5,396       5,396  
     
 
  $     $ 7,099     $ 5,396     $ 12,495  
     
A description of the methods used to determine the fair value of the Level 3 liabilities (other liabilities — contingent consideration) is included within Note 9 — Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets, and Acquisitions. The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending Level 3 liabilities for the six months ended September 26, 2009.
         
    Fair Value  
    Measurements  
    Using Significant  
    Unobservable  
    Inputs  
(in thousands)   (Level 3)  
Beginning balance
  $  
Transfers into Level 3
    4,988  
Change in value
    408  
 
     
Ending balance
  $ 5,396  
 
     
Statement No. 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments (formerly known as FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115) which allows an entity to elect to record financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value upon their initial recognition on a contract-by-contract basis. We adopted ASC Topic 825 as of March 30, 2008 and did not elect the fair value option for our eligible financial assets and financial liabilities.
Other Fair Value Disclosures
The fair value of our long-term debt obligations was $5.6 million and $6.5 million at September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively.

18


Table of Contents

11. INCOME TAXES
Our reported tax rate includes two principal components: an expected effective annual tax rate and discrete items resulting in additional provisions or benefits that are recorded in the quarter that an event arises. Events or items that give rise to discrete recognition include finalizing audit examinations for open tax years or a statute of limitation’s expiration.
The reported tax rate was 30.8% for the three months ended September 26, 2009. The reported tax rate includes:
  Our expected annual effective tax rate of 31.1%, comprised of the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35.0% reduced by tax benefits from foreign taxes (including our Swiss principal) and a domestic manufacturing deduction, plus the state tax provision, and stock compensation expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions; and
The following discrete items:
  A $0.7 million benefit (on an annual basis) from the remittance of Japanese earnings.
 
  A $0.1 million cost from foreign tax assessments.
The reported tax rate was 35.1% for the three months ended September 27, 2008. The reported tax rate equaled the expected effective annual tax rate which reflected tax benefits from foreign taxes and a domestic manufacturing deduction, offset in part by the state tax provision, and stock compensation expense not deductible in all jurisdictions.
The reported tax rate was 30.5% for the six months ended September 26, 2009. The reported tax rate includes:
  Our expected annual effective tax rate of 31.1%, comprised of the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35.0% reduced by tax benefits from foreign taxes (including our Swiss principal) and a domestic manufacturing deduction, plus the state tax provision, and stock compensation expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions; and
The following discrete items:
  A $0.7 million benefit (on an annual basis) from the remittance of Japanese earnings.
  A $0.1 million cost from foreign tax assessments.
The reported tax rate was 32.4% for the six months ended September 27, 2008. The reported tax rate included:
  A 35.1% expected effective annual tax rate which reflects tax benefits from foreign taxes and a domestic manufacturing deduction, offset in part by the state tax provision, and stock compensation expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions. The reported tax rate also included a $1.1 million reversal of previously accrued income taxes because of the expiration of the statute of limitations.
We conduct business globally and, as a result, file consolidated federal and separate state and foreign income tax returns in multiple jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world in jurisdictions including the U.S., Japan, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or foreign income tax examinations for years before 2006.
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are presently engaged in various legal actions, and although ultimate liability cannot be determined at the present time, we believe, based on consultation with counsel, that any such liability will not materially affect our consolidated financial position or our results of operations.
13. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS
Certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all full time employees at those subsidiaries. Net periodic benefit costs for the plans in the aggregate include the following components:

19


Table of Contents

                 
    For the three months ended  
    September 26, 2009     September 27, 2008  
    (in thousands)  
Service cost
  $ 124     $ 150  
Interest cost on benefit obligation
    61       66  
Expected return on plan assets
    (15 )     (19 )
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost, unrecognized
               
gain and unrecognized initial obligation
    (10 )     (4 )
 
           
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 160     $ 193  
 
           
                 
    For the six months ended  
    September 26, 2009     September 27, 2008  
    (in thousands)  
Service cost
  $ 248     $ 300  
Interest cost on benefit obligation
    122       132  
Expected return on plan assets
    (30 )     (38 )
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost, unrecognized
               
gain and unrecognized initial obligation
    (20 )     (8 )
 
           
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 320     $ 386  
 
           
14. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Segment Definition Criteria
We manage our business on the basis of one operating segment: the design, manufacture and marketing of automated blood processing systems. Our chief operating decision-maker uses consolidated results to make operating and strategic decisions. Manufacturing processes, as well as the regulatory environment in which we operate, are largely the same for all product lines.
Enterprise Wide Disclosures about Product and Services
We have three families of products: (1) disposables, (2) software solutions and (3) equipment & other.
Disposables include the plasma, blood bank, and hospital product lines. Plasma consists of the disposables used to perform apheresis for the separation of whole blood components and subsequent collection of plasma. Blood bank consists of disposables which separate whole blood for the subsequent collection of platelets, red cells, or a combination of red cells and plasma. Hospital consists of surgical disposables (principally the Cell Saver® autologous blood recovery system and cardioPAT® cardiovascular perioperative autotransfusion system), OrthoPAT® orthopedic perioperative autotransfusion system, and diagnostics products (principally the TEG® Thrombelastograph® hemostasis analyzer).
Software solutions include information technology platforms that assist blood banks, plasma centers, and hospitals more effectively manage regulatory compliance and operational efficiency.
Equipment & other revenues include revenue from equipment sales, repairs performed under preventive maintenance contracts or emergency service visits, spare part sales, and various service and training programs.

20


Table of Contents

Revenues from External Customers:
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    September 26, 2009     September 27, 2008  
    (in thousands)  
Disposable revenues
               
Plasma disposables
  $ 59,423     $ 49,924  
 
               
Blood bank disposables
               
Platelet
    37,250       36,294  
Red cell
    11,484       11,758  
 
           
 
    48,734       48,052  
 
           
Hospital disposables
               
Surgical
    16,631       15,984  
OrthoPAT
    8,678       8,393  
Diagnostics
    4,282       4,763  
 
           
 
    29,591       29,140  
 
           
 
               
Disposables revenue
    137,748       127,116  
 
               
Software solutions
    9,100       7,079  
Equipment & other
    10,222       11,724  
 
           
Total revenues
  $ 157,070     $ 145,919  
 
           
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    September 26, 2009     September 27, 2008  
    (in thousands)  
Disposable revenues
               
Plasma disposables
  $ 118,293     $ 96,792  
 
               
Blood bank disposables
               
Platelet
    71,557       71,953  
Red cell
    23,263       23,600  
 
           
 
    94,820       95,553  
 
           
Hospital disposables
               
Surgical
    34,056       33,253  
OrthoPAT
    17,262       17,189  
Diagnostics
    9,279       9,857  
 
           
 
    60,597       60,299  
 
           
 
               
Disposables revenue
    273,710       252,644  
 
               
Software solutions
    17,554       14,337  
Equipment & other
    19,894       23,054  
 
           
Total revenues
  $ 311,158     $ 290,035  
 
           
15. REORGANIZATION
During the last two years, the Company has transformed aspects of its international businesses, and more recently, its U.S. domestic Technical Operations organizations. The following summarizes the restructuring activity for the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively:

21


Table of Contents

                                         
    Six Months Ended September 26, 2009  
                                    Restructuring  
                                    Accrual  
    Balance at                     Asset     Balance at  
(Dollars in thousands)   March 28, 2009     Cost Incurred     Payments     Write down     September 26, 2009  
Employee-related costs
  $ 2,730     $     $ (967 )   $     $ 1,763  
Facility related costs
    42             (42 )            
Other exit & termination costs
    78             (78 )            
 
                             
 
  $ 2,850     $     $ (1,087 )   $     $ 1,763  
 
                             
                                         
  Six Months Ended September 27, 2008  
                                    Restructuring  
                                    Accrual  
    Balance at                     Asset     Balance at  
(Dollars in thousands)   March 29, 2008     Cost Incurred     Payments     Write down     September 27, 2008  
Employee-related costs
  $ 521     $ 1,988     $ (1,498 )   $     $ 1,011  
Facility related costs
    42       71       (71 )           42  
Other exit & termination costs
    78                         78  
 
                             
 
  $ 641     $ 2,059     $ (1,569 )   $     $ 1,131  
 
                             
16. CAPITALIZATION OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COSTS
The Company implemented an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system over the last three years.
The cost of software that is developed or obtained for internal use is accounted for pursuant to ASC Topic 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (formerly known as AICPA Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use). Pursuant to ASC Topic 350, the Company capitalizes costs incurred during the application development stage of software developed for internal use, and expenses costs incurred during the preliminary project and the post-implementation operation stages of development. The Company capitalized $4.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively, during the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, in costs incurred for acquisition of the software license and related software development costs for new internal software that was in the application development stage. The total capitalized costs incurred to date include $1.8 million for the cost of the software license and $26.2 million in third party development costs and internal personnel costs.
The Company successfully completed the final major go-live milestone implementations in the ERP system during the first six months ended September 26, 2009.
In connection with the development of the software for our next generation Blood Bank apheresis platform, the Company capitalized $0.0 million and $0.7 million in software development costs during the six months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively, in accordance with ASC Topic 985-20, Software (formerly known as SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Cost of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed). Since the start of the project, a total of $12.0 million in total software development costs has been capitalized in connection with the next generation Blood Bank apheresis platform. All costs capitalized were incurred after a detailed design of the software was developed and research and development activities on the underlying device were completed. Work on the apheresis platform has been temporarily suspended while the Company focuses on completing another project, which is expected to be completed during fiscal year 2010. We will begin to amortize these costs when the device is released for sale.
Additionally, the Company capitalized $2.5 million and $1.6 million in other software development costs for ongoing initiatives during the six-months ended September 26, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively. At September 26, 2009, we have a total of $8.4 million of costs capitalized related to other in process software development initiatives. We will begin to amortize these costs when the products are released for sale.

22


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with both our interim consolidated financial statements and notes thereto which appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our annual consolidated financial statements, notes thereto, and the MD&A contained in our fiscal year 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on May 22, 2009. The following discussion may contain forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with the “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” beginning on page 33.
Our Business
Haemonetics is a blood management solutions company for our customers. Anchored by our reputable medical device systems, we also provide information technology platforms and value added services to provide customers with business solutions which support improved clinical outcomes for patients and efficiency in the blood supply chain.
Our Plasma and Blood Bank systems automate the collection and processing of donated blood, allowing users to collect only the blood component(s) they target — plasma, platelets, or red blood cells — increasing donor and patient safety as well as collection efficiencies. Our Diagnostics systems measure a surgical patient’s clotting ability thereby aiding surgeons in assessing the likelihood for patient blood loss. Our Surgical systems salvage and process surgical patient blood so the patient’s own blood is recovered and can be transfused back to the patient. These systems include devices and single-use, proprietary disposable sets (“disposables”) that operate only with our specialized devices. Our information technology platforms are used by blood and plasma collectors to improve the safety and efficiency of blood collection logistics by eliminating previously manual functions at not-for-profit blood banks and commercial plasma centers. Our business services products include consulting, Six Sigma, LEAN manufacturing and ImpactTM Opportunity Model offerings that support our customers’ needs for regulatory compliance and operational efficiency in the blood supply chain.
We either sell our devices to customers (resulting in equipment revenue) or place our devices with customers subject to certain conditions. When the device is placed and remains our property, the customer has the right to use it for a period of time as long as the customer meets certain conditions we have established, which among other things, generally include one or more of the following:
    Purchase and consumption of a minimum level of disposables products;
 
    Payment of monthly rental fees; and/or
 
    An asset utilization performance metric, such as performing a minimum level of procedures per month per device.
Our disposables revenue stream (including sales of disposables and fees for the use of our equipment) accounted for approximately 88% and 87% of our total revenues for both second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively.

23


Table of Contents

Financial Summary
                                                 
    For the three months ended           For the six months ended    
    September 26,   September 27,   % Increase/   September 26,   September 27,   % Increase/
(in thousands, except per share data)   2009   2008   (Decrease)   2009   2008   (Decrease)
Net revenues
  $ 157,070     $ 145,919       7.6 %   $ 311,158     $ 290,035       7.3 %
Gross profit
  $ 80,967     $ 74,689       8.4 %   $ 163,910     $ 147,726       11.0 %
% of net revenues
    51.5 %     51.2 %             52.7 %     50.9 %        
 
                                               
Operating expenses
  $ 53,944     $ 51,080       5.6 %   $ 110,560     $ 104,783       5.5 %
Operating income
  $ 27,023     $ 23,609       14.5 %   $ 53,350     $ 42,943       24.2 %
% of net revenues
    17.2 %     16.2 %             17.1 %     14.8 %        
 
                                               
Interest expense
  $ (255 )   $ (16 )     1493.8 %   $ (463 )   $ (40 )     1057.5 %
Interest income
  $ 103     $ 506       (79.6 %)   $ 253     $ 1,160       (78.2 %)
Other income, net
  $ (801 )   $ (1,290 )     (37.9 %)   $ (1,135 )   $ (915 )     24.0 %
 
                                               
Income before taxes
  $ 26,070     $ 22,809       14.3 %   $ 52,005     $ 43,148       20.5 %
 
                                               
Provision for income tax
  $ 8,020     $ 8,002       0.2 %   $ 15,882     $ 14,000       13.4 %
% of pre-tax income
    30.8 %     35.1 %             30.5 %     32.4 %        
 
                                               
Net income
  $ 18,050     $ 14,807       21.9 %   $ 36,123     $ 29,148       23.9 %
% of net revenues
    11.5 %     10.1 %             11.6 %     10.0 %        
 
                                               
Earnings per share-diluted
  $ 0.69     $ 0.57       20.1 %   $ 1.37     $ 1.11       23.7 %
 
Net revenues increased 7.6% and 7.3% for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2010 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2009. The effects of foreign exchange accounted for an increase of 2.1% and 1.4% for the second quarter and six months, respectively. The remaining increase of 5.5% for the quarter and 5.9% for the six months is mainly due to increases in our plasma disposables revenue and software solutions revenue.
Gross profit increased 8.4% and 11.0% as compared to the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2009. The favorable effects of foreign exchange accounted for an increase of 3.4% and 5.8% for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2010, respectively. The remaining increase of 5.0% for the quarter and 5.2% for the six months was due primarily to increased sales and manufacturing efficiencies. This was partly offset by changes in product mix driven by higher sales of our lower margin plasma products.
Operating expenses increased 5.6% and 5.5% for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2010 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2009. The favorable effects of foreign exchange accounted for a decrease in operating expenses of 0.5% for the quarter and 1.7% for the six months, respectively. Without the effects of foreign exchange, operating expenses increased 6.1% in the second quarter and 7.2% in the first six months of fiscal year 2010. The higher operating expenses are primarily related to increased investment in research and development, the expenses from recent acquisitions, expenses associated with our ERP Phase II go-live, and higher expenses due to the introduction of blood management solutions. The noted increases in operating expenses were partly offset by a lack of restructuring costs in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009.
Operating income increased 14.5% and 24.2% for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2010 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2009. The effects of foreign exchange accounted for an increase of 11.8% and 23.7% for the second quarter and six months, respectively. Without the effects of foreign exchange operating income increased 2.7% for the quarter and 0.5% for the six months as a result of noted changes in gross profit and operating expenses.

24


Table of Contents

Net income increased 21.9% and 23.7% for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2010 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2009. The main factors that affected net income were the increase in operating income and the reduction in tax rate.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Revenues by Geography
                                                 
    For the three months ended             For the six months ended        
    September 26,     September 27,             September 26,     September 27,        
(in thousands)   2009     2008     % Increase     2009     2008     % Increase  
United States
  $ 74,856     $ 66,511       12.5 %   $ 149,869     $ 132,300       13.3 %
 
                                               
International
    82,214       79,408       3.5 %     161,289       157,735       2.3 %
 
                                   
 
                                               
Net revenues
  $ 157,070     $ 145,919       7.6 %   $ 311,158     $ 290,035       7.3 %
 
                                   
International Operations and the Impact of Foreign Exchange
Our principal operations are in the U.S., Europe, Japan and other parts of Asia. Our products are marketed in more than 80 countries around the world via a direct sales force as well as independent distributors and agents.
Our revenues generated outside the U.S. approximated 52% for both the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 and 54% for both the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2009. Revenues in Japan accounted for approximately 17.0% and 16.6% of total revenues for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively and 16.4% and 15.9% of total revenues for the first six months of fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively. Revenues in Europe accounted for approximately 27.3% and 29.6% of total revenues for the second quarters of fiscal year 2010 and 2009 and 27.6% and 30.5% of total revenues for the first six months of fiscal year 2010 and 2009, respectively. International sales are primarily conducted in local currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen and the Euro. As discussed above, our results of operations are impacted by changes in the value of the Yen and the Euro relative to the U.S. dollar.
Please see section entitled “Foreign Exchange” in this discussion for a more complete explanation of how foreign currency affects our business and our strategy for managing this exposure.
Net Revenues by Product Type
                                                 
    For the three months ended             For the six months ended        
    September 26,     September 27,     % Increase/     September 26,     September 27,     % Increase/  
(in thousands)   2009     2008     (Decrease)     2009     2008     (Decrease)  
Disposables
  $ 137,748     $ 127,116       8.4 %   $ 273,710     $ 252,644       8.3 %
Software solutions
    9,100       7,079       28.5 %     17,554       14,337       22.4 %
Equipment & other
    10,222       11,724       (12.8 %)     19,894       23,054       (13.7 %)
 
                                   
Net revenues
  $ 157,070     $ 145,919       7.6 %   $ 311,158     $ 290,035       7.3 %
 
                                   

25


Table of Contents

Disposables Revenues by Product Type
                                                 
    For the three months ended             For the six months ended        
    September 26,     September 27,     % Increase/     September 26,     September 27,     % Increase/  
(in thousands)   2009     2008     (Decrease)     2009     2008     (Decrease)  
Plasma disposables
  $ 59,423     $ 49,924       19.0 %   $ 118,293     $ 96,792       22.2 %
 
                                               
Blood bank disposables
                                               
Platelet
    37,250       36,294       2.6 %     71,557       71,953       (0.6 %)
Red cell
    11,484       11,758       (2.3 %)     23,263       23,600       (1.4 %)
                         
 
    48,734       48,052       1.4 %     94,820       95,553       (0.8 %)
                         
 
                                               
Hospital disposables
                                               
Surgical
    16,631       15,984       4.0 %     34,056       33,253       2.4 %
OrthoPAT
    8,678       8,393       3.4 %     17,262       17,189       0.4 %
Diagnostics
    4,282       4,763       (10.1 %)     9,279       9,857       (5.9 %)
                         
 
    29,591       29,140       1.5 %     60,597       60,299       0.5 %
                         
 
                                               
Total disposables revenue
  $ 137,748     $ 127,116       8.4 %   $ 273,710     $ 252,644       8.3 %
                         
Disposables
Disposables include the Plasma, Blood Bank, and Hospital product lines. Disposables revenue increased 8.4% and 8.3% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 over the comparable periods of fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange resulted in a 1.8% and 1.2% increase for the quarter and six months. The remaining increase of 6.6% and 7.1% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 were driven by increases in the Plasma product line, as discussed below.
Plasma
Plasma disposables revenue increased 19.0% and 22.2% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange resulted in a 2.0% and 1.2% increase for the quarter and six months, respectively. For both the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2010 as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2009, higher collections in both the U.S. and Europe, share gains, and, to a lesser extent, pricing were the main reasons for the remaining increase.
As supply-demand balance has been achieved between source plasma collected and used in pharmaceutical production, we are seeing a moderation in collections. The fractionation companies will continue to balance collections to support the underlying growth in demand for plasma drugs which we believe to be in the 7% range. With contractual price increases, new products, and market share gains, we anticipate that plasma disposable revenue growth will moderate, but continue to outpace collection market growth in the near term.
Blood Bank
Blood bank consists of platelet and red cell disposables.
Platelet disposables revenue increased 2.6% for the second quarter and decreased 0.6% for the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2009. Comparing the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 to that of 2009, foreign exchange accounted for an increase of 2.3% and 2.1%, respectively. For the quarter, the remaining increase of 0.3% was the result of growth in China and Taiwan offset by share loss in Japan. Without the effect of currency, revenues decreased 2.7% in the first six months. The decrease was driven by the first quarter challenges in South Korea associated with the significant devaluation of South Korea’s currency, the Won, and by the reasons noted for the second quarter growth.
Red cell disposables decreased 2.3% and 1.4% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2009. Comparing the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 to that of 2009, foreign exchange accounted for a decrease of 1.1% and 0.7%, respectively. The remaining decrease of 1.2% for the quarter and 0.7% for the six months was driven by lower demand for red cells, as a result of (i) fewer surgeries, thus a

26


Table of Contents

reduced demand for blood and (ii) 5% more donors due to the entry of 16 year olds to the blood donor population, which combined resulted in a reliance on a higher percentage of whole blood collections.
Hospital
Hospital consists of surgical, OrthoPAT, and diagnostics products.
Revenues from our surgical disposables increased 4.0% and 2.4% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2009. Surgical disposables revenue consists principally of the Cell Saver and cardioPAT products. Foreign exchange resulted in an increase in surgical disposables revenue of 1.9% for the quarter and 2.1% for the six months. Without the effect of currency, surgical disposables increased 2.1% and 0.3% for the second quarter and the first six months, respectively. The increase was primarily the result of increases in sales of cardioPAT products, as more hospitals adopt the cardioPAT products.
Revenues from our OrthoPAT disposables increased 3.4% and 0.4% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange had a minimal impact, a 0.5% increase, on OrthoPAT disposables revenue for the quarter and no impact on revenue for the first six months. The increase was primarily the result of market share gains.
Revenues from our diagnostics products decreased 10.1% and 5.9% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2009. Diagnostics product revenue consists principally of the TEG products. Comparing the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 to that of 2009, foreign exchange accounted for an increase of 3.9% and 0.4%, respectively. Without the effect of currency, diagnostic product revenues decreased of 15.0% for the quarter and 6.3% for the six months. Diagnostics product revenue is unique, compared to revenue from other products, in that it includes TEG disposable and equipment sales. The revenue decline in the quarter and year-to-date are due to a decline in TEG equipment sales. The noted decrease was partly offset by an 11.1% and 10.0% increase in TEG disposables for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010.
Software Solutions
Our software solutions revenues include revenue from software sales. Software solutions revenues increased 28.5% and 22.4% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 over the comparable period of fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange resulted in a 1.4% and 1.1% increase for the quarter and six months. The remaining increase of 27.1% and 21.3% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 was driven by increased sales to commercial plasma customers and revenues associated with two recent acquisitions.
Equipment & Other
Our equipment & other revenues include revenue from equipment sales, repairs performed under preventive maintenance contracts or emergency service visits, spare part sales, and various service and training programs. Equipment & other revenues decreased 12.8% and 13.7% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 over the comparable period of fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange resulted in a 7.8% and 4.7% increase for the quarter and six months. Without the effect of currency, the decrease of 20.6% and 18.4% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 is primarily the result of fewer equipment sales, particularly to distributor customers due to macro economic trends impacting health care funding.
Gross Profit
                                                 
    For the three months ended             For the six months ended        
    September 26,     September 27,             September 26,     September 27,        
(in thousands)   2009     2008     % Increase     2009     2008     % Increase  
Gross profit
  $ 80,967     $ 74,689       8.4 %   $ 163,910     $ 147,726       11.0 %
% of net revenues
    51.5 %     51.2 %             52.7 %     50.9 %        
Gross profit increased 8.4% and 11.0% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 as compared to the same periods of fiscal year 2009. Our gross profit margin improved 30 basis points for the second quarter and 180 basis points for the first six months of fiscal year 2010. The improvement was attributable to foreign exchange and improved

27


Table of Contents

manufacturing efficiencies, particularly for our plasma business. Product mix partly offset these improvements due to increased sales of our lower margin plasma products.
Operating Expenses
                                                 
    For the three months ended           For the six months ended    
    September 26,   September 27,           September 26,   September 27,    
(in thousands)   2009   2008   % Increase   2009   2008   % Increase
Research, development and engineering
  $ 6,475     $ 5,217       24.1 %   $ 13,252     $ 11,061       19.8 %
% of net revenues
    4.1 %     3.6 %             4.3 %     3.8 %        
 
                                               
Selling, general and administrative
  $ 47,469     $ 45,863       3.5 %   $ 97,308     $ 93,722       3.8 %
% of net revenues
    30.2 %     31.4 %             31.3 %     32.3 %        
 
                                               
Total operating expenses
  $ 53,944     $ 51,080             $ 110,560     $ 104,783          
% of net revenues
    34.3 %     35.0 %             35.5 %     36.1 %        
Research, Development and Engineering
Research, development and engineering expenses increased 24.1% and 19.8% for the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010 as compared to the same periods of fiscal year 2009. The increase is a result of increased spending in the whole blood and Arryx blood diagnostics technologies.
Selling, General and Administrative
During the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2010, selling, general and administrative expenses increased 3.5% and 3.8%, respectively. Foreign exchange resulted in a 0.3% and 1.7% decrease in selling, general and administrative during the quarter. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange, selling, general and administrative expense increased 3.8% and 5.5% for the second quarter and six months. The increase was due primarily to (i) expenses brought on from recent acquisitions that had not been reflected in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, (ii) expenses associated with our ERP Phase II go-live, and (iii) general selling, marketing and handling costs necessary to support the increase in sales and the introduction of blood management solutions. The noted increases were partly offset by a lack of restructuring costs in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the first six months of fiscal year 2009.
Operating Income
                                                 
    For the three months ended           For the six months ended    
    September 26,   September 27,           September 26,   September 27,    
(in thousands)   2009   2008   % Increase   2009   2008   % Increase
Operating income
  $ 27,023     $ 23,609       14.5 %   $ 53,350     $ 42,943       24.2 %
% of net revenues
    17.2 %     16.2 %             17.1 %     14.8 %        
Operating income increased 14.5% and 24.2% for the second quarter and first six months of fiscal year 2010 as compared to the same periods of fiscal year 2009. Foreign exchange resulted in increases of 11.8% and 23.7% in operating income during the quarter and first six months, respectively. Without the effects of foreign currency, operating income increased 2.7% for the quarter and 0.5% for the first six months due to the net of sales and gross profit growth offset by increases in operating expenses.

28


Table of Contents

Other (expense)/income,
net
                                                 
    For the three months ended             For the six months ended        
    September 26,     September 27,     %     September 26,     September 27,     %  
(in thousands)   2009     2008     Increase     2009     2008     Decrease  
Interest expense
  $ (255 )   $ (16 )           $ (463 )   $ (40 )        
Interest income
    103       506               253       1,160          
Other expense, net
    (801 )     (1,290 )             (1,135 )     (915 )        
 
                                       
Total other (expense)/income, net
  $ (953 )   $ (800 )     19.1 %   $ (1,345 )   $ 205       n.m.  
 
                                       
Total other expense, net increased 19.1% for the second quarter and total other income, net decreased more than 100% for first six months of fiscal year 2010 as compared to the same periods of fiscal year 2009. The main reasons for the decrease is the net of (i) the increase in interest expense due to the accounting relating to the contingent consideration on a recent acquisition and (ii) the decrease in interest income due to significantly reduced investment yield.
Income Taxes
                                                 
    For the three months ended             For the six months ended        
    September 26,     September 27,             September 26,     September 27,     %  
(in thousands)   2009     2008     % Decrease     2009     2008     Decrease  
Reported income tax rate
    30.8 %     35.1 %     (4.3 %)     30.5 %     32.4 %     (1.9 %)
Our reported tax rate includes two principal components: an expected effective annual tax rate and discrete items resulting in additional provisions or benefits that are recorded in the quarter that an event arises. Events or items that give rise to discrete recognition include finalizing audit examinations for open tax years or a statute of limitation’s expiration.
The reported tax rate was 30.8% for the three months ended September 26, 2009. The reported tax rate includes:
  Our expected annual effective tax rate of 31.1%, comprised of the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35.0% reduced by tax benefits from foreign taxes (including our Swiss principal) and a domestic manufacturing deduction, plus the state tax provision, and stock compensation expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions; and
The following discrete items:
  A $0.7 million benefit (on an annual basis) from the remittance of Japanese earnings.
 
  A $0.1 million cost from foreign tax assessments.
The reported tax rate was 35.1% for the three months ended September 27, 2008. The reported tax rate equaled the expected effective annual tax rate which reflected tax benefits from foreign taxes and a domestic manufacturing deduction, offset in part by the state tax provision, and stock compensation expense not deductible in all jurisdictions.
The reported tax rate was 30.5% for the six months ended September 26, 2009. The reported tax rate includes:
  Our expected annual effective tax rate of 31.1%, comprised of the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35.0% reduced by tax benefits from foreign taxes (including our Swiss principal) and a domestic manufacturing deduction, plus the state tax provision, and stock compensation expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions; and
The following discrete items:
  A $0.7 million benefit (on an annual basis) from the remittance of Japanese earnings.
 
  A $0.1 million cost from foreign tax assessments.

29


Table of Contents

The reported tax rate was 32.4% for the six months ended September 27, 2008. The reported tax rate included:
  A 35.1% expected effective annual tax rate which reflects tax benefits from foreign taxes and a domestic manufacturing deduction, offset in part by the state tax provision, and stock compensation expenses not deductible in all jurisdictions. The reported tax rate also included a $1.1 million reversal of previously accrued income taxes because of the expiration of the statute of limitations.
We conduct business globally and, as a result, file consolidated federal and separate state and foreign income tax returns in multiple jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world in jurisdictions including the U.S., Japan, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or foreign income tax examinations for years before 2006.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table contains certain key performance indicators we believe depict our liquidity and cash flow position:
                 
(dollars in thousands)   September 26, 2009     March 28, 2009  
Cash & cash equivalents
  $ 178,322     $ 156,721  
Working capital
  $ 293,302     $ 289,530  
Current ratio
    3.6       4.1  
Net cash position (1)
  $ 158,167     $ 150,683  
Days sales outstanding (DSO)
    68       67  
Disposables finished goods inventory turnover
    6.8       7.1  
 
(1)   Net cash position is the sum of cash and cash equivalents less total debt.
Our primary sources of capital include cash and cash equivalents, internally generated cash flows, bank borrowings and option exercises. We believe these sources to be sufficient to fund our requirements, which are primarily capital expenditures and acquisitions, new business and product development, and working capital for at least the next twelve months.
                         
    For the six months ended     Increase/  
(in thousands)   September 26, 2009     September 27, 2008     (Decrease)  
Net cash provided by (used in):
                       
Operating activities
  $ 61,479     $ 41,777     $ 19,702  
Investing activities
    (52,261 )     (28,737 )     (23,524 )
Financing activities
    11,907       (33,825 )     45,732  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (1)
    476       (1,437 )     1,913  
 
                 
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  $ 21,601     $ (22,222 )   $ 43,823  
 
                 
 
(1)   The balance sheet is affected by spot exchange rates used to translate local currency amounts into U.S. dollars. In accordance with GAAP, we have removed the effect of foreign currency throughout our cash flow statement, except for its effect on our cash and cash equivalents.
In May 2009, Board of Directors approved a $40 million share repurchase. Through September 26, 2009, the Company repurchased 139,722 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $7.6 million. Of the shares repurchased, 22,413 shares at an aggregate purchase price of $1.2 million had not yet settled as of September 26, 2009. At September 26, 2009, we had $32.4 million remaining on the $40 million share repurchase limit set by the Board of Directors.
Cash Flow Overview:
Six Month Comparison

30


Table of Contents

Operating Activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $19.7 million in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 as compared to the first six months of 2009 due primarily to:
    $7.0 million increase in net income;
 
    $9.1 million reduced investment in accounts receivable due to improved collections over the same period last year;
 
    $9.9 million reduced investment in inventories;
 
    $6.2 million reduced investment in prepaid income taxes; and
 
    $9.9 million reduced investment in other assets and other long-term liabilities
     partially offset by
    the $5.9 million change in unrealized gain from hedging activities and
 
    a $17.1 million increase in payments of accounts payable and accrued expenses that was primarily the result of a $13.7 million payment of (i) the fiscal year 2009 employee performance bonuses worldwide and (ii) the discretionary bonus for extraordinary performance to all employees other than the Chief Executive Officer and certain other executives during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.
Investing Activities:
Net cash used in investing activities increased during the first six months of fiscal year 2010 as compared to the first six months of 2009 due primarily to the $12.8 million acquisition of SEBRA, the $6.6 million paid relating to the acquisition of Neoteric, and the $4.1 million increased spending in capital expenditures on property, plant, and equipment.
Financing Activities:
Net cash used in financing activities decreased by $45.7 million in the first six months of fiscal year 2010 as compared to the first six months of 2009 due primarily to:
    $53.7 million decrease in cash paid out relating to stock repurchases and
 
    $11.5 million increase in net borrowings under short-term revolving credit agreements
     partially offset by
    $19.5 million decrease in exercise of stock options and related tax benefits.
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation had a significant impact on our results of operations for the periods presented. Historically, we believe we have been able to mitigate the effects of inflation by improving our manufacturing and purchasing efficiencies, by increasing employee productivity, and by adjusting the selling prices of products. We continue to monitor inflation pressures generally and raw materials indices that may affect our procurement and production costs. Increases in the price of petroleum derivatives could result in corresponding increases in our costs to procure plastic raw materials.
Foreign Exchange
Our revenues generated outside the U.S. in local currencies approximated 52% for both the second quarter and the first six months of fiscal year 2010, yet our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Foreign exchange risk arises because we engage in business in foreign countries in local currency. Exposure is partially mitigated by producing and sourcing product in local

31


Table of Contents

currency and expenses incurred by local sales offices. However, whenever the U.S. dollar strengthens relative to the other major currencies, there is an adverse affect on our results of operations and alternatively, whenever the U.S. dollar weakens relative to the other major currencies there is a positive effect on our results of operations.
Our primary foreign currency exposures in relation to the U.S. dollar are the Euro and the Japanese Yen. In response to the global economic turmoil and sharply increased volatility in the foreign exchange rates, we entered into forward contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from forecasted Great British Pound and Canadian Dollar denominated expenses.
It is our policy to minimize for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates by using derivative financial instruments known as forward contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from forecasted foreign currency denominated sales. Hedging through the use of forward contracts does not eliminate the volatility of foreign exchange rates, but because we generally enter into forward contracts one year in advance of the foreign currency denominated cash flows, rates are fixed for a one-year period, thereby facilitating financial planning and resource allocation. We enter into forward contracts that mature one month prior to the anticipated timing of the forecasted foreign currency denominated sales. These contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and are intended to lock in the expected cash flows of forecasted foreign currency denominated sales at the available spot rate. Actual spot rate gains and losses on these contracts are recorded in sales, at the same time the underlying transactions being hedged are recorded. The final impact of currency fluctuations on the results of operations is dependent on the local currency amounts hedged and the actual local currency results.
Presented below are the spot rates for our Euro and Japanese Yen cash flow hedges that settled in fiscal year 2009, settled the first six months of fiscal year 2010, or are presently outstanding. These hedges cover our long foreign currency positions that result from our sales in Europe and Japan. The table also shows the relative strengthening or weakening of the spot rates associated with those hedge contracts versus the spot rates in the contracts that settled in the prior comparable period.
                                                                 
    First   Strengthen   Second   Strengthen   Third   Strengthen   Fourth   Strengthen
    Quarter   / (Weaken)   Quarter   / (Weaken)   Quarter   / (Weaken)   Quarter   / (Weaken)
Euro — Hedge Spot Rate (US$  per Euro)                                        
FY09
    1.3453               1.3704               1.4396               1.4908          
FY10
    1.5681       16.6 %     1.4890       8.6 %     1.3192       (8.4 %)     1.2812       (14.1 %)
FY11
    1.3582       (13.4 %)     1.4272       (4.2 %)                                
 
                                                               
Japanese Yen — Hedge Spot Rate (JPY per US$)                                        
FY09
    120.6432               116.7411               112.8810               106.2511          
FY10
    105.2792       12.7 %     105.1132       10.0 %     96.3791       14.6 %     93.4950       12.0 %
FY11
    98.1677       6.8 %     97.1902       7.5 %                                
 
*   We generally place our cash flow hedge contracts on a rolling twelve month basis. Accordingly, the only hedge contracts placed for fiscal year 2011 are for the first and second quarters.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, an amendment to FASB ASC topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and Update No. 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, an amendment to FASB ASC subtopic 985-605, Software — Revenue Recognition, (the “Updates”). The Updates provide guidance on arrangements that include software elements, including tangible products that have software components that are essential to the functionality of the tangible product and will no longer be within the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance, and software-enabled products that will now be subject to other relevant revenue recognition guidance. The Updates provide authoritative guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables that are outside the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance. Under the new guidance, when vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence for deliverables in an arrangement cannot be determined, a best estimate of the selling price is required to separate deliverables and allocate arrangement consideration using the relative selling price method. The Updates also include new disclosure requirements on how the application of the relative selling price method affects the timing and amount of revenue recognition. The Updates must be adopted in the same period using the same transition method and are effective prospectively, with retrospective adoption permitted, for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is also permitted; however, early adoption during an interim period requires retrospective application from the beginning of the fiscal year. The

32


Table of Contents

Company is currently assessing the timing and method of adoption, as well as the possible impact of this guidance on its financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued requirements under FASB Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. FASB Statement No. 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This statement became effective during our second quarter of fiscal year 2010 and its impact is reflected in our financial position and results of operation for the six months ended September 26, 2009.
Under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations (formerly known as FASB Statement No. 141(R), Business Combinations), the FASB requires that all business combinations use the acquisition method (formerly the purchase method) and that an acquiring entity be identified in all business combinations. ASC Topic 805 also requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. This statement became effective for our fiscal year 2010 and its impact is reflected in our financial position and results of operations for the six months ended September 26, 2009. The Company’s acquisition of L’Attitude Medical Systems, Inc. (“Neoteric”) and asset acquisition of the blood collection and processing business unit (“SEBRA”) of Engineering and Research Associates, Inc. during the first six months of fiscal year 2010 were both accounted for in accordance to the requirements of ASC Topic 805 — see Note 9.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Statements contained in this report, as well as oral statements we make which are prefaced with the words “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “designed,” and similar expressions, are intended to identify forward looking statements regarding events, conditions, and financial trends that may affect our future plans of operations, business strategy, results of operations, and financial position. These statements are based on our current expectations and estimates as to prospective events and circumstances about which we can give no firm assurance. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made. As it is not possible to predict every new factor that may emerge, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as a prediction of our actual future financial condition or results. These forward-looking statements, like any forward-looking statements, involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Such risks and uncertainties include technological advances in the medical field, and our standards for transfusion medicine and our ability to successfully implement products that incorporate such advances and standards, product demand and market acceptance of our products, regulatory uncertainties, the effect of economic and political conditions, the impact of competitive products and pricing, price volatility in petroleum products (plastics are the principal component of our disposables, which are the main source of our revenues), the impact of industry consolidation, foreign currency exchange rates, changes in customers’ ordering patterns, the effect of industry consolidation as seen in the Plasma market, the effect of communicable diseases and the effect of uncertainties in markets outside the U.S. (including Europe and Asia) in which we operate. The foregoing list should not be construed as exhaustive.

33


Table of Contents

ITEM 3. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
The Company’s exposures relative to market risk are due to foreign exchange risk and interest rate risk.
Foreign exchange risk
See the section entitled Foreign Exchange for a discussion of how foreign currency affects our business. It is our policy to minimize for a period of time, the unforeseen impact on our financial results of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates by using derivative financial instruments known as forward contracts to hedge anticipated cash flows from forecasted foreign currency denominated sales. We do not use the financial instruments for speculative or trading activities. At September 26, 2009, we had the following significant foreign exchange contracts to hedge the anticipated cash flows from forecasted foreign currency denominated sales outstanding:
                                         
    (BUY) / SELL     Weighted Spot     Weighted Forward     Fair Value        
Hedged Currency   Local Currency     Contract Rate     Contract Rate     Gain / (Loss)     Maturity  
Euro
    7,828,000       1.299       1.292     $ (1,413,761 )   Oct 2009 - Nov 2009
Euro
    10,584,808       1.281       1.282     $ (1,985,965 )   Dec 2009 - Feb 2010
Euro
    9,582,063       1.358       1.357     $ (1,079,106 )   Mar 2010 - May 2010
Euro
    8,816,747       1.427       1.428     $ (387,977 )   Jun 2010 - Aug 2010
Japanese Yen
    1,134,426,068     94.36 per US$   93.53 per US$   $ (296,028 )   Oct 2009 - Nov 2009
Japanese Yen
    1,394,096,500     93.50 per US$   92.58 per US$   $ (215,647 )   Dec 2009 - Feb 2010
Japanese Yen
    1,369,475,624     98.17 per US$   97.50 per US$   $ (941,142 )   Mar 2010 - May 2010
Japanese Yen
    1,392,004,698     94.91 per US$   94.35 per US$   $ (519,603 )   Jun 2010 - Aug 2010
GBP
    (711,970 )     1.399       1.399     $ 167,372     Oct 2010
GBP
    (2,274,093 )     1.405       1.406     $ 512,921     Nov 2009 - Jan 2010
GBP
    (2,276,051 )     1.471       1.472     $ 359,711     Feb 2010 - Apr 2010
GBP
    (2,727,724 )     1.653       1.652     $ (40,838 )   May 2010 - Jul 2010
GBP
    (818,502 )     1.633       1.631     $ 3,609     Aug - 2010
CAD
    (3,247,851 )   1.113 per US$   1.111 per US$   $ 96,026     Oct 2009 - Dec 2009
CAD
    (3,761,190 )   1.088 per US$   1.086 per US$   $ 32,844     Jan 2010 - Mar 2010
CAD
    (2,985,642 )   1.096 per US$   1.095 per US$   $ 47,610     Apr 2010 - Jun 2010
CAD
    (2,138,628 )   1.108 per US$   1.108 per US$   $ 55,301     Jul 2010 - Aug 2010
 
                                     
 
                          $ (5,604,674 )        
 
                                     
We estimate the change in the fair value of all forward contracts assuming both a 10% strengthening and weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to all other major currencies. In the event of a 10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar, the change in fair value of all forward contracts would result in a $11.6 million increase in the fair value of the forward contracts; whereas a 10% weakening of the US dollar would result in a $13.2 million decrease in the fair value of the forward contracts.
Interest Rate Risk
All of our long-term debt is at fixed rates. Accordingly, a change in interest rates has an insignificant effect on our interest expense amounts. The fair value of our long-term debt, however, does change in response to interest rate movements due to its fixed rate nature. These changes reflect the premium (when market interest rates decline below the contract fixed interest rates) or discount (when market interest rates rise above the fixed interest rate) that an investor in these long term obligations would pay in the market interest rate environment.
At September 26, 2009, the fair value of our long-term debt was approximately $0.7 million higher than the value of the debt reflected on our financial statements. This higher fair market is entirely related to the $5.0 million remaining principal balance of the original $10.0 million, 8.41% real estate mortgage due January, 2016.
Using scenario analysis, if the interest rate on all long-term maturities changed by 10% from the rate levels that existed at September 26, 2009, the fair value of our long-term debt would change by approximately $0.1 million.

34


Table of Contents

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation, as of September 26, 2009, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively) regarding the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the three months ended September 26, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

35


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.   Legal Proceedings
In December 2005, we filed a lawsuit against Baxter Healthcare SA and Fenwal Inc. in Massachusetts federal district court, seeking an injunction and damages on account of Baxter’s infringement of a Haemonetics patent, through the sale of Baxter’s ALYX brand automated red cell collection system, a competitor of our automated red cell collection systems. In March 2007, Baxter sold the Transfusion Technologies Division (which markets the ALYX product) to private investors, TPG, and Maverick Capital, Ltd. The new company which resulted from the sale was renamed Fenwal. In January 2009, a jury found that the Fenwal ALYX system infringed Haemonetics’ patent and awarded us $15.7 million in damages for past infringement. On June 2, 2009, the court ruled that, in addition to paying the damages awarded by the jury, Fenwal must stop selling the ALYX consumable by December 1, 2010 and must pay Haemonetics a 10% royalty on ALYX consumable net sales from January 30, 2009 until December 1, 2010 when the injunction takes effect. In addition, the court awarded pre-judgment interest at 5% on the unpaid damages awarded. On August 19, 2009, an amended judgment was issued under which Haemonetics was awarded $11.3 million for lost profits suffered as a result of the infringement, $4.4 million in royalty damages suffered as a result of the infringement, and prejudgment interest of $2.3 million for a total award of $18.0 million. These rulings may be appealed by Fenwal or Baxter.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, careful consideration should be given to the factors discussed in Part 1, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 28, 2009, which could materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or that it currently deems to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect its business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Through September 26, 2009, the Company repurchased 139,722 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $7.6 million. Of the shares repurchased, 22,413 shares at an aggregate purchase price of $1.2 million had not yet settled as of September 26, 2009. We reflect stock repurchases in our financial statements on a “trade date” basis and as Authorized Unissued (Haemonetics is a Massachusetts company and under Massachusetts law repurchased shares are treated as authorized but unissued). In April 2 2009, the Board of Directors set a $40.0 million share repurchase expenditure limit which was publicly announced. At September 26, 2009 we had $32.4 million remaining on the $40.0 million share repurchase limit set by the Board of Directors.
All of the purchases during the quarter were made under the publicly announced program. All purchases were made in the open market.
                                 
                    Total Dollar Value     Maximum Dollar  
            Average Price     of Shares Purchased     Value of Shares that  
    Total Number     Paid per Share     as Part of Publicly     May Yet be  
    of Shares     including     Announced Plans     Purchased Under the  
Period   Repurchased     Commissions     or Programs     Plans or Programs  
Aug. 23, 2009 to Sept. 26, 2009
    139,722     $ 54.83     $ 7,579,989     $ 32,420,011  
 
                       
 
                               
Total
    139,722     $ 54.83     $ 7,579,989     $ 32,420,011  
 
                       
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
     Not applicable.

36


Table of Contents

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On July 30, 2009 the Company held its annual meeting of stockholders. At the meeting, Ronald Gelbman and Brad Nutter were re-elected as Directors for a term ending in 2012. The voting results were as follows:
Ronald Gelbman                For: 24,207,111                      Withheld: 373,408
Brad Nutter                        For: 23,819,968                       Withheld: 760,551
The other members of the Board of Directors whose terms continued after the meeting were:
Serving a Term Ending in 2010 — Susan Bartlett Foote, Pedro P. Granadillo, and Mark W. Kroll, Ph.D.
Serving a Term Ending in 2011 — Lawrence Best, Brian Concannon, and Ronald Merriman
At the meeting, the stockholders ratified the selection by the Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as independent public accountants for the current fiscal year. The vote was as follows:
For: 23,158,297                  Against: 1,417,607                  Abstain: 4,614                     Broker Non-Vote: —
Item 5. Other Information
     None
Item 6. Exhibits
     
10Z
  2005 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan effective July 27, 2005, as amended July 31, 2008 and July 29, 2009
 
   
31.1
  Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
 
   
31.2
  Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002, of Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President Business Development of the Company
 
   
32.1
  Certification Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
 
   
32.2
  Certification Pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President Business Development of the Company

37


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  HAEMONETICS CORPORATION
 
 
Date: November 4, 2009  By:   /s/ Brian Concannon    
    Brian Concannon, President and Chief Executive Officer   
    (Principal Executive Officer)   
 
     
Date: November 4, 2009  By:   /s/ Christopher Lindop    
    Christopher Lindop, Chief Financial Officer and Vice   
    President Business Development (Principal Financial Officer)   
 

38