e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from _______ to _______.
Commission file number: 002-25577
DIODES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
95-2039518 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
15660 Dallas Parkway, Suite 850 |
|
|
Dallas, Texas
|
|
75248 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(972) 385-2810
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the registrants Common Stock outstanding as of November 3, 2010 was
44,374,675.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 Financial Statements
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
263,807 |
|
|
$ |
241,953 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,600 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
123,493 |
|
|
|
99,074 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
113,069 |
|
|
|
89,652 |
|
Deferred income taxes, current |
|
|
9,257 |
|
|
|
7,834 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
10,207 |
|
|
|
11,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
519,833 |
|
|
|
746,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net |
|
|
199,098 |
|
|
|
162,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
67,668 |
|
|
|
68,075 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
29,949 |
|
|
|
34,892 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,836 |
|
|
|
5,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
822,384 |
|
|
$ |
1,017,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
- 3 -
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (cont)
(In thousands, except share data)
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit and short-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
299,414 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
74,766 |
|
|
|
62,448 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
46,337 |
|
|
|
27,236 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
3,919 |
|
|
|
2,641 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
125,694 |
|
|
|
392,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes |
|
|
126,318 |
|
|
|
121,333 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
|
3,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS, net of current portion |
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
1,669 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES, non-current |
|
|
10,360 |
|
|
|
7,743 |
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES |
|
|
44,929 |
|
|
|
40,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
312,005 |
|
|
|
567,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diodes Incorporated stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock par value $1.00 per share;
1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock par value $0.66 2/3 per share;
70,000,000 shares authorized; 44,360,466 and
43,729,304 issued and outstanding at September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
29,574 |
|
|
|
29,153 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
223,745 |
|
|
|
211,618 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
300,941 |
|
|
|
248,174 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(55,930 |
) |
|
|
(48,311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Diodes Incorporated stockholders equity |
|
|
498,330 |
|
|
|
440,634 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
12,049 |
|
|
|
10,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
510,379 |
|
|
|
450,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
822,384 |
|
|
$ |
1,017,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
- 4 -
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
163,120 |
|
|
$ |
122,122 |
|
|
$ |
449,120 |
|
|
$ |
304,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
|
|
102,143 |
|
|
|
84,547 |
|
|
|
286,893 |
|
|
|
224,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
60,977 |
|
|
|
37,575 |
|
|
|
162,227 |
|
|
|
79,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
22,837 |
|
|
|
19,079 |
|
|
|
65,678 |
|
|
|
50,375 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
7,212 |
|
|
|
6,284 |
|
|
|
20,403 |
|
|
|
16,944 |
|
Amortization of acquisition related intangible assets |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
|
|
3,480 |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
31,147 |
|
|
|
26,343 |
|
|
|
89,529 |
|
|
|
70,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
29,830 |
|
|
|
11,232 |
|
|
|
72,698 |
|
|
|
9,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
2,587 |
|
|
|
3,907 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(939 |
) |
|
|
(1,784 |
) |
|
|
(4,317 |
) |
|
|
(5,709 |
) |
Amortization of debt discount |
|
|
(2,006 |
) |
|
|
(1,981 |
) |
|
|
(5,713 |
) |
|
|
(6,471 |
) |
Other |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
(1,062 |
) |
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses |
|
|
(2,415 |
) |
|
|
(4,022 |
) |
|
|
(5,694 |
) |
|
|
(9,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest |
|
|
27,415 |
|
|
|
7,210 |
|
|
|
67,004 |
|
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAX PROVISION (BENEFIT) |
|
|
5,346 |
|
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
11,705 |
|
|
|
4,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
22,069 |
|
|
|
7,839 |
|
|
|
55,299 |
|
|
|
(5,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: NET INCOME attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(907 |
) |
|
|
(819 |
) |
|
|
(2,532 |
) |
|
|
(1,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
21,162 |
|
|
$ |
7,020 |
|
|
$ |
52,767 |
|
|
$ |
(6,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in computation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
44,346 |
|
|
|
42,533 |
|
|
|
44,031 |
|
|
|
41,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
45,673 |
|
|
|
44,013 |
|
|
|
45,418 |
|
|
|
41,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
- 5 -
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
55,299 |
|
|
$ |
(5,192 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
34,452 |
|
|
|
31,599 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
3,308 |
|
|
|
3,480 |
|
Amortization of convertible bond issuance costs |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
Amortization of debt discount |
|
|
5,713 |
|
|
|
6,471 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
9,780 |
|
|
|
7,551 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(1,684 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
(1,193 |
) |
Investment loss (gain) recognized under equity method |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Changes in operating assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(19,917 |
) |
|
|
(25,655 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(23,578 |
) |
|
|
19,455 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
3,082 |
|
Changes in operating liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
12,182 |
|
|
|
7,724 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
9,549 |
|
|
|
(2,913 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
(3,524 |
) |
Income tax payable |
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
90,046 |
|
|
$ |
43,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments |
|
$ |
296,600 |
|
|
$ |
8,725 |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(66,342 |
) |
|
|
(12,948 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
$ |
232,015 |
|
|
$ |
(3,657 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances on line of credit and short-term debt |
|
$ |
3,762 |
|
|
$ |
15,680 |
|
Repayments on lines of credit |
|
|
(303,192 |
) |
|
|
(27,305 |
) |
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
2,763 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
Dividend distribution to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(700 |
) |
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(1,062 |
) |
|
|
(8,503 |
) |
Repayments of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
$ |
(298,631 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(1,576 |
) |
|
|
3,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
21,854 |
|
|
|
22,576 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
241,953 |
|
|
|
103,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
263,807 |
|
|
$ |
126,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment purchased on accounts payable |
|
$ |
(5,828 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,875 |
) |
Fair value of common stock issued for repayment of
long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(31,437 |
) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
- 6 -
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE A Nature of Operations, Basis of Presentation and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Nature of Operations
Diodes Incorporated and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) is a leading global
manufacturer and supplier of high-quality, application specific standard products within the broad
discrete, logic and analog semiconductor markets, serving the consumer electronics, computing,
communications, industrial and automotive markets. These products include diodes, rectifiers,
transistors, MOSFETs, protection devices, functional specific arrays, single gate logic, amplifiers
and comparators, Hall-effect and temperature sensors, power management devices including LED
drivers, DC-DC switching and linear voltage regulators and voltage references along with special
function devices including USB power switches, load switches, voltage supervisors and motor
controllers. These products are sold primarily throughout Asia, North America and Europe.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S.) (GAAP) for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. They do
not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position,
results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S. GAAP for complete financial
statements. These consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) considered necessary for a fair
presentation of the results of operations for the period presented have been included in the
interim period. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
The consolidated condensed financial data at December 31, 2009 is derived from audited financial
statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. As permitted under U.S.
GAAP, interim accounting for certain expenses, including income taxes, are based on full year
forecasts. Such amounts are expensed in full in the year incurred. For interim financial
reporting purposes, income taxes are recorded based upon estimated annual effective income tax
rates.
Certain prior years balances have been reclassified to conform to the current financial
statement presentation.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) No. 2010-13, Compensation Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating
the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in which the
Underlying Equity Security Trades. ASU No. 2010-13 clarifies that an employee share-based payment
award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion
of the entitys equity shares trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a
market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as
a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The provisions of ASU No. 2010-13 are effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15,
2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a
material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, Revenue Recognition Milestone Method (Topic
605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition (A consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).
ASU No. 2010-17 provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be
appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development
transactions. The amendments provide guidance on the criteria that should be met for determining
whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate. An entity can recognize
consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the
period in which the milestone was achieved only if the milestone meets all criteria to be
considered substantive. The provisions of ASU No. 2010-17 are effective on a prospective basis for
milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after
June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
- 7 -
NOTE B Functional Currencies, Foreign Currency Translation and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Functional Currencies and Foreign Currency Translation The functional currency for the
Companys China subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar, while other subsidiaries, including subsidiaries
in Taiwan and the United Kingdom (U.K.) use their local currency as their functional currency.
Transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated
in a currency other than the functional currency are recorded as other income (expense) in the
consolidated condensed statements of operations. The Company had foreign exchange transaction
losses of approximately $0.2 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively, and approximately $0.7 million and $4.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) U.S. GAAP generally requires that recognized revenues,
expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and
liabilities are reported as separate components of the equity section of the balance sheet, such
items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income or loss. As of September 30,
2010, the components of other comprehensive income or loss include foreign currency translation
adjustments and unrealized gain or loss on defined benefit plan.
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 is as follows (in thousands):
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
22,069 |
|
|
$ |
7,839 |
|
|
$ |
55,299 |
|
|
$ |
(5,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
7,361 |
|
|
|
(1,391 |
) |
|
|
(3,552 |
) |
|
|
12,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized income (loss) on defined benefit plan, net of tax |
|
|
1,802 |
|
|
|
10,246 |
|
|
|
(4,068 |
) |
|
|
(16,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency adjustments on forward contracts, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
31,232 |
|
|
|
17,135 |
|
|
|
47,679 |
|
|
|
(5,452 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
30,325 |
|
|
$ |
16,316 |
|
|
$ |
45,147 |
|
|
$ |
(6,959 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 8 -
NOTE C Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is
calculated similarly but includes potential dilution from the exercise of stock options and stock
awards, except when the effect would be anti-dilutive.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share is as follows (in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
BASIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
used in computing basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
44,346 |
|
|
|
42,533 |
|
|
|
44,031 |
|
|
|
41,761 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
21,162 |
|
|
$ |
7,020 |
|
|
$ |
52,767 |
|
|
$ |
(6,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
used in computing basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
|
44,346 |
|
|
|
42,533 |
|
|
|
44,031 |
|
|
|
41,761 |
|
Add: Assumed exercise of stock options and stock
awards |
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,673 |
|
|
|
44,013 |
|
|
|
45,418 |
|
|
|
41,761 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
21,162 |
|
|
$ |
7,020 |
|
|
$ |
52,767 |
|
|
$ |
(6,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no shares included in the earnings per share calculation related to the Companys
2.25% convertible senior notes (Notes) outstanding as our average stock price did not exceed the
conversion price and, therefore, there is no conversion spread.
NOTE D Short-Term Investments
On June 30, 2010, the Company put back its auction rate securities (ARS) portfolio to UBS AG
at par value pursuant to the previously disclosed settlement agreement with UBS AG. Upon exercise
of the put option, the Company liquidated its ARS, for cash and used the proceeds to fully repay
the related no net cost loan with UBS Bank.
NOTE E Inventories
Inventories stated at the lower of cost or market value are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
48,462 |
|
|
$ |
33,280 |
|
Work-in-progress |
|
|
31,720 |
|
|
|
24,029 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
32,887 |
|
|
|
32,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
113,069 |
|
|
$ |
89,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 9 -
NOTE F Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Changes in goodwill are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
68,075 |
|
Foreign currency exchange |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
67,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
48,658 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(13,558 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange |
|
|
(7,672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net value |
|
|
27,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets with indefinite lives: |
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
3,162 |
|
Foreign currency exchange |
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
29,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization was $1.1
million and $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and
$3.3 million and $3.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
- 10 -
NOTE G Income Tax Provision
Income tax expense of $5.3 million and $11.7 million was recorded for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. This resulted in an effective tax rate of 17.5% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to (1,837.7)% for the same period of last
year and compared to 11.7% for the full year of 2009. The Companys effective tax rate for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 was lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35%, as it was
impacted by higher income in lower-taxed jurisdictions and the non-cash tax benefit from reversing
valuation allowances on deferred tax assets from U.S. and U.K. loss carryforwards. In addition,
the Companys effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was impacted by the
non-cash income tax expense associated with repatriating earnings of foreign subsidiaries to the
U.S. parent.
Generally, income taxes are recorded based upon estimated annual effective income tax rates.
Other methods may be used in situations where small changes in the Companys estimated annual
income could produce large changes in the estimated effective income tax rates used for interim
financial reporting. Under these circumstances, the Company elected to use its actual year-to-date
effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company reported domestic and foreign
pre-tax income (loss) of approximately $(15.2) million and $82.2 million, respectively. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company reported domestic and foreign pre-tax income
(loss) of approximately $(35.7) million and $35.4 million, respectively.
The impact of tax holidays decreased the Companys tax expense by approximately $5.6 million
and $5.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The benefit
of the tax holidays on basic and diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 was approximately $0.13 and $0.12, respectively. The benefit of the tax holidays on both
basic and diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was approximately
$0.12.
Funds repatriated from foreign subsidiaries to the U.S. may be subject to federal and state
income taxes. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company repatriated approximately $28.5 million of
accumulated earnings from one of its Chinese subsidiaries, resulting in additional non-cash federal
and state income tax expense of approximately $5.3 million. The Company intends to permanently
reinvest overseas all of its earnings from its foreign subsidiaries.
In the third quarter of 2010, the Company reversed valuation allowances of $1.5 million
associated with federal net operating losses after determining they were fully utilizable. In
addition, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that a portion of its federal
foreign tax credit carryforwards would expire before they could be utilized. Accordingly, the
Company has recorded valuation allowances of $8.8 million and $11.3 million as of September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. jurisdiction and various state and foreign
jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities
for tax years before 2007. Although the outcome of tax audits is always uncertain, the Company
believes that adequate amounts of tax, interest and penalties, if any, have been provided for in
the Companys reserves for any adjustments that may result from future tax audits. The Company
recognizes accrued interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income
tax expense. As of September 30, 2010, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was
approximately $8.7 million.
It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized benefit with respect to certain
of the Companys unrecognized tax positions will significantly increase or decrease within the next
12 months. These changes may be the result of settlement of ongoing audits or competent authority
proceedings. At this time, an estimate of the range of the reasonably possible outcomes cannot be
determined.
NOTE H Share-Based Compensation
The following table shows the total compensation expensed for share-based compensation plans,
including stock options and share grants, recognized in the statements of operations (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
$ |
279 |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
|
2,824 |
|
|
|
2,409 |
|
|
|
8,510 |
|
|
|
6,391 |
|
Research and development expense |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation
expense |
|
$ |
3,266 |
|
|
$ |
2,867 |
|
|
$ |
9,780 |
|
|
$ |
7,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 11 -
Stock Options. Stock options generally vest in equal annual installments over a four-year
period and expire ten years after the grant date, and expense was estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The total net cash proceeds received from stock option exercises during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 was $2.8 million. Stock option expense was $1.0 million for both three months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and $3.1 million and $2.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
A summary of the stock option plans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
Stock Options |
|
Shares (000) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term (yrs) |
|
|
Value ($000) |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
3,980 |
|
|
$ |
12.50 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
34,989 |
|
Granted |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
19.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
7.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,478 |
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
27.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
3,994 |
|
|
$ |
13.60 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
20,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
3,073 |
|
|
$ |
11.98 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
19,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above is before applicable income taxes and
represents the amount option holders would have received if all options had been exercised on the
last business day of the period indicated, based on the Companys closing stock price.
As of September 30, 2010, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to
unvested stock options, net of forfeitures, was approximately $9.4 million, before income taxes,
and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.9 years.
Share Grants. Restricted stock awards and restricted stock units generally vest in equal
annual installments over a four-year period.
The total fair value of share grants vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2010
was approximately $7.5 million. Share grant expense was $2.2 million and $1.8 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $6.7 million and $5.0 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
A summary of the status of the Companys non-vested restricted stock units is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
Grants |
|
Shares (000) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value ($000) |
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
714 |
|
|
$ |
20.64 |
|
|
$ |
14,579 |
|
Granted |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
17.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
21.33 |
|
|
|
7,474 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
20.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at September 30, 2010 |
|
|
794 |
|
|
$ |
16.29 |
|
|
$ |
13,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above table does not include the restricted stock award agreement the Company entered into
with its President and Chief Executive Officer on September 22, 2009, which could grant up to
600,000 shares based on terms of the agreement.
- 12 -
As of September 30, 2010, total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to
unvested share grants, net of forfeitures, was approximately $23.5 million, before income taxes and
is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3.6 years.
NOTE I Segment Information and Enterprise-Wide Disclosure
For financial reporting purposes, the Company operates in a single segment, standard
semiconductor products, through the Companys various manufacturing and distribution facilities.
The Company aggregates its products because the products are similar and have similar economic
characteristics, and the products are similar in production process and share the same customer
type.
The Companys primary operations include the operations in Asia, North America and Europe.
Revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the location of subsidiaries producing
the revenues (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
Asia |
|
|
America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
133,116 |
|
|
$ |
42,769 |
|
|
$ |
45,129 |
|
|
$ |
221,014 |
|
Inter-company sales |
|
|
(15,961 |
) |
|
|
(14,898 |
) |
|
|
(27,035 |
) |
|
|
(57,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
117,155 |
|
|
$ |
27,871 |
|
|
$ |
18,094 |
|
|
$ |
163,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Asia |
|
|
America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
103,394 |
|
|
$ |
21,267 |
|
|
$ |
31,925 |
|
|
$ |
156,586 |
|
Inter-company sales |
|
|
(8,293 |
) |
|
|
(6,662 |
) |
|
|
(19,509 |
) |
|
|
(34,464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
95,101 |
|
|
$ |
14,605 |
|
|
$ |
12,416 |
|
|
$ |
122,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
Asia |
|
|
America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
364,347 |
|
|
$ |
112,380 |
|
|
$ |
127,772 |
|
|
$ |
604,499 |
|
Inter-company sales |
|
|
(38,054 |
) |
|
|
(40,094 |
) |
|
|
(77,231 |
) |
|
|
(155,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
326,293 |
|
|
$ |
72,286 |
|
|
$ |
50,541 |
|
|
$ |
449,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
137,604 |
|
|
$ |
30,116 |
|
|
$ |
31,378 |
|
|
$ |
199,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
439,303 |
|
|
$ |
169,801 |
|
|
$ |
213,280 |
|
|
$ |
822,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Asia |
|
|
America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Total sales |
|
$ |
247,127 |
|
|
$ |
58,049 |
|
|
$ |
80,456 |
|
|
$ |
385,632 |
|
Inter-company sales |
|
|
(17,983 |
) |
|
|
(16,782 |
) |
|
|
(46,797 |
) |
|
|
(81,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
229,144 |
|
|
$ |
41,267 |
|
|
$ |
33,659 |
|
|
$ |
304,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
95,672 |
|
|
$ |
30,591 |
|
|
$ |
37,258 |
|
|
$ |
163,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
350,442 |
|
|
$ |
269,070 |
|
|
$ |
295,102 |
|
|
$ |
914,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 13 -
Geographic Information
Revenues were derived from (billed to) customers located in the following countries. All
Others represents countries with less than 10% of the total revenues each (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the Three Months |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
China |
|
$ |
49,944 |
|
|
$ |
37,562 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
|
30.8 |
% |
United States |
|
|
41,641 |
|
|
|
19,025 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
Taiwan |
|
|
36,035 |
|
|
|
34,518 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
28.3 |
% |
Korea |
|
|
9,681 |
|
|
|
7,518 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
Germany |
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
|
4,606 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Singapore |
|
|
7,079 |
|
|
|
4,605 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
United Kingdom |
|
|
6,757 |
|
|
|
5,335 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
All Others |
|
|
4,723 |
|
|
|
8,953 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
163,120 |
|
|
$ |
122,122 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the Nine Months |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
China |
|
$ |
138,901 |
|
|
$ |
91,105 |
|
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
Taiwan |
|
|
103,841 |
|
|
|
87,247 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
28.7 |
% |
United States |
|
|
103,430 |
|
|
|
50,354 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
Korea |
|
|
26,569 |
|
|
|
19,303 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
Germany |
|
|
24,412 |
|
|
|
12,693 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Singapore |
|
|
18,448 |
|
|
|
9,553 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
United Kingdom |
|
|
13,432 |
|
|
|
12,436 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
All Others |
|
|
20,087 |
|
|
|
21,379 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
449,120 |
|
|
$ |
304,070 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 14 -
NOTE J Convertible Senior Notes
In October 2006, the Company issued and sold Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $230
million due 2026, which pay 2.25% interest per annum on the principal amount of the Notes, payable
semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning on April 1, 2007. On
each of October 1, 2011, October 1, 2016 and October 1, 2021, holders may require the Company to
purchase all or a portion of their Notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the Notes to be purchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the
purchase date.
The Notes can be converted into cash or, at the Companys option, cash and/or shares of the
Companys Common Stock based on an initial conversion rate, subject to adjustment, of 25.6419
shares (stock split adjusted) per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, which represents an initial
conversion price of $39.00 per share (stock split adjusted), in certain circumstances. In addition,
following a make-whole fundamental change that occurs prior to October 1, 2011, the Company will,
at its option, increase the conversion rate for a holder who elects to convert its Notes in
connection with such make-whole fundamental change, in certain circumstances.
In determining the liability and equity components, the Company determined the expected life
of the Notes to be five years as that is the earliest date in which the Notes can be put back to
the Company at par value. As of September 30, 2010, 12 months remain over which the discount of
the liability will be amortized. As of September 30, 2010, the liability and equity components are
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability |
|
|
|
Liability |
|
Liability |
|
Equity |
Component |
|
|
|
Component |
|
Component |
|
Component |
Principal |
|
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
Unamortized |
|
Carrying |
Amount |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Discount |
|
Amount |
$ |
134,293 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
126,318 |
|
|
$ |
7,975 |
|
|
$ |
35,515 |
|
The effective interest rate of the liability component is 8.5%, which is a comparable yield
for non-convertible notes with terms and conditions otherwise comparable to the Companys Notes as
of the date of issuance. The amount of interest expense, including amortization of debt discount
for the liability component and debt issuance costs is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Notes contractual interest expense |
|
$ |
769 |
|
|
$ |
857 |
|
|
$ |
2,321 |
|
|
$ |
2,801 |
|
Amortization of debt discount |
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
5,713 |
|
|
|
6,471 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,913 |
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,446 |
|
|
$ |
9,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE K Commitments
Purchase Commitments As of September 30, 2010, the Company had approximately $12.9 million
in non-cancelable purchase contracts related to capital expenditures, primarily for manufacturing
equipment in China.
NOTE L Employee Benefit Plans
Defined Benefit Plan
The Company has a contributory defined benefit plan that covers certain employees in the U.K.
and Germany. The net pension and supplemental retirement benefit obligations and the related
periodic costs are based on, among other things, assumptions regarding the discount rate, estimated
return on plan assets and mortality rates. These obligations and related periodic costs are
measured using actuarial techniques and assumptions. The projected unit credit method is the
actuarial cost method used to compute the pension liabilities and related expenses.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net period benefit costs associated with the
defined benefit plan were approximately $1.1 million.
- 15 -
The following tables set forth the benefit obligation, the fair value of plan assets, and the
funded status of the Companys plan (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan |
|
Change in benefit obligation: |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
117,539 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
230 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
4,724 |
|
Actuarial loss |
|
|
7,679 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(2,541 |
) |
Foreign currency changes |
|
|
(2,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
125,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets: |
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
88,235 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
6,240 |
|
Employer contribution |
|
|
1,458 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(2,541 |
) |
Foreign currency changes |
|
|
(2,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
91,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
Underfunded status at September 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
(33,776 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Based on an actuarial study performed as of September 30, 2010, the plan is underfunded and a
liability of approximately $33.8 million is reflected in the Companys consolidated financial
statements as a long-term liability. The amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was a net loss of $4.1 million and the
weighted-average discount rate assumption used to determine benefit obligations as of September 30,
2010 was 5.0%.
The following are weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
Expected long-term return on plan assets |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
The Company adopted a payment plan with the trustees of the defined benefit plan, in which the
Company will pay approximately ₤1.0 million GBP (approximately $1.6 million based on a USD:GBP
exchange rate of 1.6:1) every year from 2009 through 2012.
The Company also has pension plans in Asia for which the benefit obligation, fair value of the
plan assets and the funded status amounts are deemed immaterial and therefore, not included in the
figures or assumptions above.
Deferred Compensation
The Company maintains a Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the Deferred Compensation
Plan) for executive officers, key employees and members of the Board of Directors (the Board).
The Deferred Compensation Plan allows eligible participants to defer the receipt of eligible
compensation, including equity awards, until designated future dates. The Company offsets its
obligations under the Deferred Compensation Plan by investing in the actual underlying investments.
These investments are classified as trading securities and are carried at fair value. At September
30, 2010, these investments totaled approximately $3.2 million. All gains and losses in these
investments are equally offset by corresponding gains and losses in the Deferred Compensation Plan
liabilities.
- 16 -
NOTE M Related Parties
The Company conducts business with one related party company, Lite-On Semiconductor
Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, LSC), our largest stockholder,
owned approximately 18.9% of the Companys outstanding Common Stock as of
September 30, 2010. The Company also conducts business with Keylink International (B.V.I.) Inc.
and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, Keylink). Keylink is the Companys 5% joint
venture partner in the Companys Shanghai manufacturing subsidiaries.
The Audit Committee of the Companys Board reviews all related party transactions for
potential conflict of interest situations on an ongoing basis, in accordance with such procedures
that the Audit Committee may adopt from time to time.
Lite-On Semiconductor Corporation During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
the Company sold products to LSC totaling 1.3% and 2.2% of its net sales, respectively. Also, for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, 7.1% and 6.4%, respectively, of the Companys
net sales were from semiconductor products purchased from LSC for subsequent sale, making LSC the
Companys largest external supplier.
Net sales to, and purchases from, LSC are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,457 |
|
|
$ |
2,503 |
|
|
$ |
5,983 |
|
|
$ |
6,583 |
|
Purchases |
|
$ |
11,073 |
|
|
$ |
9,283 |
|
|
$ |
31,961 |
|
|
$ |
22,410 |
|
Keylink International (B.V.I.) Inc. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, the Company sold products to companies owned by Keylink totaling 2.7% and 2.9% of its net
sales, respectively. Also for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, 2.0% and 1.1%,
respectively, of the Companys net sales were from semiconductor products purchased from companies
owned by Keylink. In addition, the Companys subsidiaries in China lease their manufacturing
facilities from, and subcontract a portion of their manufacturing process (metal plating and
environmental services) to Keylink. The Company also pays a consulting fee to Keylink. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company paid Keylink an aggregate of $10.7
million and $7.5 million, respectively, with respect to these items.
Net sales to, and purchases from, companies owned by Keylink are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
4,235 |
|
|
$ |
3,156 |
|
|
$ |
11,977 |
|
|
$ |
8,712 |
|
Purchases |
|
$ |
3,059 |
|
|
$ |
1,575 |
|
|
$ |
8,232 |
|
|
$ |
3,950 |
|
Accounts receivable from, and accounts payable to, LSC and Keylink are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
LSC |
|
$ |
1,108 |
|
Keylink |
|
|
8,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
LSC |
|
$ |
8,900 |
|
Keylink |
|
|
6,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
- 17 -
Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters addressed in this Item 2
constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such
forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including those
discussed below under the heading Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the Companys
management. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Act) provides certain
safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements made in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made pursuant to the Act. The Company undertakes no
obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to its forward-looking statements that
may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence
of unexpected events. Unless the context otherwise requires, the words Diodes, the Company,
we, us and our refer to Diodes Incorporated and its subsidiaries.
This managements discussion should be read in conjunction with the managements discussion
included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,
previously filed with Securities and Exchange Commission.
Highlights
|
|
|
Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $163.1 million, an increase
of $41.0 million, or 33.6%, over the same period last year, and a sequential increase of
9.4% over the $149.2 million in the second quarter of 2010; |
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $449.1 million, an increase
of $145.0 million, or 47.7%, over the same period last year; |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $61.0 million, an
increase of $23.4 million, or 62.2%, over the same period last year, and a sequential
increase of 14.0% over the $53.5 million in the second quarter of 2010; |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $162.2 million, an
increase of $82.8 million, or 104.3%, over the same period last year; |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was 37.4%, compared to
30.8% for the same period last year, and 35.8% for the second quarter of 2010; |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was 36.1%, compared to
26.1% for the same period last year; |
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders for the three months ended September 30,
2010 was $21.2 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, compared to the same period last year
of $7.0 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, and second quarter 2010 of $16.6 million, or
$0.37 per diluted share; |
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 was $52.8 million, or $1.16 per diluted share, compared to the same period last year,
which had a net loss of $(6.7) million, or $(0.16) per share; and |
|
|
|
|
On June 30, 2010, we put our auction rate securities (ARS) back to UBS AG at par value
pursuant to the previously disclosed settlement agreement, which liquidated our ARS for
cash, and the proceeds were used to fully repay the related no net cost loan with UBS
Bank. |
Overview
We are a leading global manufacturer and supplier of high-quality, application specific
standard products within the broad discrete, logic and analog semiconductor markets, serving the
consumer electronics, computing, communications, industrial and automotive markets. These products
include diodes, rectifiers, transistors, MOSFETs, protection devices, functional specific arrays,
single gate logic, amplifiers and comparators, Hall-effect and temperature sensors, power
management devices including LED drivers, DC-DC switching and linear voltage regulators and voltage
references along with special function devices including USB power switches, load switches, voltage
supervisors and motor controllers. The products are sold primarily throughout Asia, North America
and Europe.
We design, manufacture and market these semiconductors for diverse end-use applications.
Semiconductors, which provide electronic signal amplification and switching functions, are basic
building-block electronic components that are incorporated into almost every electronic device. We
believe that our focus on standard semiconductor products provides us with a meaningful competitive
advantage relative to other semiconductor companies that provide a wider range of semiconductor
products.
During the first quarter of 2010, we saw an increase in our net sales due to strong demand in
all geographic regions led by North America and Europe. During the second and third quarters of
2010, we saw a further increase in net sales due to a strong demand for our products across all
markets with particular strength in North America and Europe. In addition, during the first,
second and third quarters, gross profit margin increased due to improved product mix in North
America and Europe, which includes a favorable mix of higher margin new products, as well as
increased capacity at our wafer fabrication facilities and generally stable
- 18 -
average selling prices (ASP). For the fourth quarter of 2010, as we see the market supply
shortage easing and demand for our products to level off, we expect net sales and gross profit to
be relatively the same as compared to the third quarter of 2010.
As described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,
the principal elements of our strategy include the following:
|
|
|
Continue to rapidly introduce innovative discrete, logic and analog semiconductor
products; |
|
|
|
|
Expand our available market opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
Maintain intense customer focus; |
|
|
|
|
Enhance cost competitiveness; and |
|
|
|
|
Pursue selective strategic acquisitions. |
In implementing these strategies, the following factors have affected, and, we believe, will
continue to affect, our results of operations:
|
|
|
For 2010, we have seen increased demand for our products as compared to 2009. We have
experienced pressure from our customers and competitors to reduce the selling price for our
standard products, and we expect future improvements in net income to result primarily from
increases in sales volume and improvements in product mix as well as manufacturing cost
reductions in order to offset any reduced ASP of our products. |
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our original equipment manufacturers
(OEM) and electronic manufacturing services (EMS) customers together accounted for
approximately 47% of our net sales, while our global network of distributors accounted for
approximately 53% of our net sales. |
|
|
|
|
Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $449.1 million compared to
$304.1 million in the same period last year. This increase in net sales primarily reflects
the increase in demand for our products in all geographic regions. |
|
|
|
|
Our gross profit margin was 36.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared
to 26.1% in the same period last year. Our gross margin percentage increased over the same
period last year due to improved product mix and higher capacity utilization at our
manufacturing and wafer fabrication facilities. Future gross profit margins will depend
primarily on our product mix, manufacturing cost savings, and the demand for our products. |
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our capital expenditures were
approximately 16.1% of our net sales, which is an increase from our historical 10% to 12%
of net sales model. We expect capital expenditures for fiscal 2010 to be higher than our
historical model as we increase capacity due to increased demand. |
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the percentage of our net sales derived
from our Asia subsidiaries was 72.7%, compared to 75.4% in the same period last year. The
decrease was due primarily to improvements in North America and Europe. We expect our net
sales to the Asia market to increase as a percentage of our total net sales as a result of
our customers continuing to shift their manufacturing of electronic products to Asia. In
addition, Europe accounted for approximately 11.3% of our net sales for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, compared to 10.4% in the same period last year. |
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010, we had invested approximately $278.0 million in our Asia
manufacturing facilities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we invested
approximately $64.0 million in these manufacturing facilities, and we expect to continue to
invest in our manufacturing facilities, although the amount to be invested will depend on
product demand and new product developments. |
|
|
|
|
We have increased our investment in research and development from $16.9 million, or 5.6%
of net sales, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $20.4 million, or 4.5% of net
sales, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. For the remainder of 2010, we expect
research and development to decrease slightly as a percentage of net sales compared to the
third quarter of 2010. |
- 19 -
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
The following table sets forth, the percentage that certain items in the statements of
operations bear to net sales and the percentage dollar increase (decrease) of such items from
period to period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Net Sales |
|
Percentage Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
'09 to '10 |
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
33.6 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
(62.6 |
) |
|
|
(69.2 |
) |
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
62.3 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
165.6 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(65.3 |
) |
Interest expense and amortization of debt discount |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(21.8 |
) |
Other income (expenses) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(123.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest |
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
280.2 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(949.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
181.5 |
|
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
201.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following discussion explains in greater detail our consolidated operating results and
financial condition for the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2009. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net Sales |
|
$ |
163,120 |
|
|
$ |
122,122 |
|
Net sales increased approximately $41.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010,
compared to the same period last year. The 33.6% increase in net sales represented an approximately
22.9% increase in units sold and an 8.7% increase in ASP. The revenue increase for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 was attributable to increase in demand for our products in all markets
with particular strength in North America and Europe. For the remainder of 2010, we expect net
sales to be relatively the same as compared to the third quarter of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
102,143 |
|
|
$ |
84,547 |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
60,977 |
|
|
$ |
37,575 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
37.4 |
% |
|
|
30.8 |
% |
Cost of goods sold increased approximately $17.6 million, or 20.1%, for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to the same period last year. As a percent of sales, cost of goods
sold decreased to 62.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 69.2% in the same
period last year, and our average unit cost (AUP) decreased approximately 1.7% due primarily to
product mix. The decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales was due to higher net
sales, which offset a portion of fixed costs.
- 20 -
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, gross profit increased by approximately $23.4
million, or 62.3%, compared to the same period last year. Gross margin increased to 37.4% for the
three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to 30.8% for the same period last year, primarily
due to higher capacity utilization of our manufacturing and wafer fabrication facilities and
improved product mix. For the remainder of 2010, we expect gross margin to be relatively the same
as compared to the third quarter of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) |
|
$ |
22,837 |
|
|
$ |
19,079 |
|
SG&A for the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased approximately $3.8 million, or
19.7%, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to higher sales commissions related to
increased sales, as well as to higher employee related costs including incentives and higher
general operating costs. SG&A as a percentage of sales, decreased to 14.0% for the three months
ended September 30, 2010, compared to 15.6% in the same period last year due to higher net sales.
For the remainder of 2010, we expect SG&A to be comparable to the third quarter of 2010 on a
percentage of net sales basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Research and development expenses (R&D) |
|
$ |
7,212 |
|
|
$ |
6,284 |
|
R&D for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $7.2 million, an increase of
approximately $0.9 million from the same period last year, primarily due to increased personnel
costs, engineering supplies and material purchases. R&D, as a percentage of sales, decreased to
4.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared to 5.1% in the same period last year
due to higher net sales. For the remainder of 2010, we expect R&D to be comparable to the third
quarter of 2010 on a percentage of net sales basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets
|
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets was approximately $1.1 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and approximately $1.3 million in the same period last year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Interest income |
|
$ |
279 |
|
|
$ |
805 |
|
Interest income decreased for the three months ended September 30, 2010 to $0.3 million,
compared to $0.8 million in the same period last year, due primarily to the absence of interest
income being earned on our ARS, which were put back to UBS at par value on June 30, 2010 in
accordance with the previously disclosed settlement agreement. For the remainder of 2010, we
expect interest income to be lower than 2009 since we are no longer earning interest on the ARS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
939 |
|
|
$ |
1,784 |
|
Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $1.0 million,
compared to $1.8 million in the same period last year. The $0.8 million decrease in interest
expense was due primarily to the repurchase and retirement of $95.7 million par value of Notes
since the fourth quarter of 2008 and due to the fact our no net cost loan was paid off on June
30, 2010 in connection with the previously disclosed settlement agreement with UBS. For the
remainder of 2010, we expect interest expense to be lower than 2009 since we are no longer being
charged interest for the no net cost loan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Amortization of debt discount |
|
$ |
2,006 |
|
|
$ |
1,981 |
|
Amortization of debt discount was approximately $2.0 million for both the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and the same period last year.
- 21 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Other income (expense) |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
(1,062 |
) |
Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $0.3 million, compared to other
expense of $1.1 million in the same period last year. Included in other expense for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 was a $1.4 million foreign currency transaction losses due
primarily to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus the British Pound, negatively affecting
foreign currency hedges acquired in connection with our acquisition of Zetex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
$ |
5,346 |
|
|
$ |
(629 |
) |
We recognized income tax expense of $5.3 million for the three months ended September 30,
2010, compared to a $(0.6) million income tax benefit in the same period last year. Income taxes
for the interim periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 have been included in the accompanying
financial statements on the basis of an estimated annual effective rate and actual year-to-date
effective income tax rate, respectively. The estimated effective tax rate is 19.5% for the three
months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to (8.7)% in the same period last year. Our effective
tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate
of 35%, as it was impacted by higher income in lower-taxed jurisdictions and the non-cash tax
benefit from reversing valuation allowances on deferred tax assets from U.S. loss carryforwards.
In addition, the Companys effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was
impacted by income in lower-taxed jurisdictions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
907 |
|
|
$ |
819 |
|
Noncontrolling interest represented the minority investors share of the earnings of our China
and Taiwan subsidiaries for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. The noncontrolling
interest in the subsidiaries and their equity balances are reported separately in the consolidation
of our financial statements, and the activities of these subsidiaries are included therein. Our
interests in these subsidiaries have not materially changed since December 31, 2009.
- 22 -
Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
The following table sets forth, the percentage that certain items in the statements of
operations bear to net sales and the percentage dollar increase (decrease) of such items from
period to period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Dollar |
|
|
Percent of Net Sales |
|
Increase |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
'09 to '10 |
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
47.7 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
(63.9 |
) |
|
|
(73.9 |
) |
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
104.2 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
700.7 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(33.8 |
) |
Interest expense and amortization of debt discount |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
Other income (expenses) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(262.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling
interest |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(25,101.5 |
) |
Income tax provision |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
137.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(1,165.1 |
) |
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
68.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(887.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following discussion explains in greater detail our consolidated operating results and
financial condition for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net Sales |
|
$ |
449,120 |
|
|
$ |
304,070 |
|
Net sales increased approximately $145.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
compared to the same period last year. The 47.7% increase in net sales represented an approximately
38.5% increase in units sold and a 6.6% increase in ASP. The revenue increase for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 was attributable to increase in demand for our products in all geographic
regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
286,893 |
|
|
$ |
224,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
162,227 |
|
|
$ |
79,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
36.1 |
% |
|
|
26.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold increased approximately $62.3 million, or 27.7%, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to the same period last year. As a percent of sales, cost of goods
sold decreased to 63.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 73.9% in the same
period last year, and our AUP decreased 7.8% due to product mix. The decrease in cost of goods
sold as a percentage of sales was due to higher net sales, which offset a portion of the fixed
costs.
- 23 -
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, gross profit increased by approximately $82.8
million, or 104.2%, compared to the same period last year. Gross margin increased to 36.1% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to 26.1% for the same period last year, primarily
due to higher capacity utilization of our manufacturing and wafer fabrication facilities and
improved product mix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
SG&A |
|
$ |
65,678 |
|
|
$ |
50,375 |
|
SG&A for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased approximately $15.3 million, or
30.4%, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to higher sales commissions related to
increased sales, as well as to higher employee related costs including incentives and higher
general operating costs. SG&A, as a percentage of sales, decreased to 14.7% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, compared to 16.6% in the same period last year due to higher net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
R&D |
|
$ |
20,403 |
|
|
$ |
16,944 |
|
R&D for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $20.4 million, an increase of
approximately $3.5 million from the same period last year, primarily due to increased personnel
costs, engineering supplies and material purchases. R&D, as a percentage of sales, decreased to
4.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to 5.6% in the same period last year
due to higher net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets |
|
$ |
3,304 |
|
|
$ |
3,480 |
|
Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets was approximately $3.3 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and approximately $3.5 million in the same period last year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Interest income |
|
$ |
2,587 |
|
|
$ |
3,907 |
|
Interest income decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $2.6 million,
compared to $3.9 million in the same period last year, due primarily to a decrease in interest
income earned on our ARS, which were put back to UBS at par value on June 30, 2010 in accordance
with the previously disclosed settlement agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
4,317 |
|
|
$ |
5,709 |
|
Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $4.3 million,
compared to $5.7 million in the same period last year. The $1.4 million decrease in interest
expense was due primarily to the repurchase and retirement of $95.7 million par value of Notes
since the fourth quarter of 2008 and due to the fact our no net cost loan was paid off on June
30, 2010 in connection with the previously disclosed settlement agreement with UBS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Amortization of debt discount |
|
$ |
5,713 |
|
|
$ |
6,471 |
|
Amortization of debt discount for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $5.7 million,
compared to $6.5 million in the same period last year. The $0.8 million decrease in amortization
of debt discount was due primarily to the repurchase and retirement of Notes during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Other income (expense) |
|
$ |
1,749 |
|
|
$ |
(1,074 |
) |
Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $1.7 million, compared to other
expense of $1.1 million in the same period last year. Included in other income for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 was a $1.7 million gain on sale of non-core intellectual property for
which no intangible assets were recorded. Included in other expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was foreign currency losses of $3.4 million, partially offset by a $1.5 million
gain on forgiveness of debt from government subsidies in China and a $1.4 million gain on
extinguishment of debt.
- 24 -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Income tax provision |
|
$ |
11,705 |
|
|
$ |
4,924 |
|
We recognized income tax expense of $11.7 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, compared to a $4.9 million in the same period last year. Income taxes for the interim
periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 have been included in the accompanying financial
statements on the basis of an estimated annual effective rate and actual year-to-date effective
income tax rate, respectively. The estimated effective tax rate is 17.5% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the effective tax rate for the same period last year of
(1837.7)%. Our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was lower than the
U.S. statutory tax rate of 35%, as it was impacted by higher income in lower-taxed jurisdictions
and the non-cash tax benefit from reversing valuation allowances on deferred tax assets from U.S.
and U.K. loss carryforwards. In addition, the Companys effective tax rate for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 was impacted by the non-cash income tax expense associated with
repatriating earnings of foreign subsidiaries to the U.S. parent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
2,532 |
|
|
$ |
1,507 |
|
Noncontrolling interest represented the minority investors share of the earnings of our China
and Taiwan subsidiaries for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. The noncontrolling
interest in the subsidiaries and their equity balances are reported separately in the consolidation
of our financial statements, and the activities of these subsidiaries are included therein. Our
interests in these subsidiaries have not materially changed since December 31, 2009.
- 25 -
Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, funds from operations and
borrowings under our credit facilities. We currently have a U.S. credit agreement for a $10
million revolving credit facility and a $10 million uncommitted facility with no outstanding
borrowings and have foreign credit facilities with borrowing capacities of approximately $25.0
million with no outstanding borrowings and $3.6 million used for import and export guarantees. Our
primary liquidity requirements have been to meet our inventory and capital expenditure needs and to
fund on-going operations. At December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2010, our working capital was
$354.3 million and $394.1 million, respectively. Our working capital increased in the first nine
months of 2010 primarily due to the increase in cash, accounts receivables and inventories,
partially offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. We expect cash
generated by our U.S. and international operations, together with existing cash, cash equivalents
and available credit facilities, to be sufficient to cover cash needs for working capital and
capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. Cash and cash equivalents, the conversion of
other working-capital items and borrowings are expected to be sufficient to fund on-going
operations.
During the third quarter of 2010, we did not renew revolving foreign credit facilities
totaling approximately $20 million. While our operational cash flow is sufficient to fund current
operations, we are in the process of renegotiating the terms for these revolving credit facilities.
On June 30, 2010, we put back our ARS portfolio to UBS AG at par value pursuant to the
previously disclosed settlement agreement with UBS AG. Upon exercise of the put option, we
liquidated our ARS, for cash and used the proceeds to fully repay the related no net cost loan
with UBS Bank.
On October 1, 2011 the holders of our 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (Notes) can
require us to purchase all or a portion of their Notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the Notes to be purchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but
excluding, the purchase date. Therefore, during the fourth quarter of 2010, we will reclassify our
Notes from long-term debt to current liabilities. Should the holders choose to require us to
purchase their Notes, we will be required to use available funds and/or seek alternative means to
service the debt.
Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were $72.2 million
and $15.8 million, respectively. Our capital expenditures for these periods were primarily related
to manufacturing expansion in our facilities in China. Capital expenditures in the first nine
months of 2010 were approximately 16.1% of our net sales, which is an increase from our historical
10% to 12% of net sales model. We expect capital expenditures for fiscal 2010 to be higher than
our historical model.
Discussion of Cash Flow
Cash and cash equivalents increased from $242.0 million at December 31, 2009, to $263.8
million at September 30, 2010 primarily from cash provided by operating and investing activities,
offset by cash used in financing activities.
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was
$90.0 million, resulting primarily from $55.3 million of net income, $37.8 million in depreciation
and amortization and $9.8 million in share-based compensation, offset by a greater increase in
operating assets than operating liabilities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $44.0
million for the same period last year. Net cash provided by operating activities increased $46.0
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to the same period last year. This
increase resulted primarily from a $60.5 million increase in net income, offset by changes in
operating assets and liabilities.
Investing Activities
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities was $232.0 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 compared to ($3.7) million for the same period last year. The $235.7
million increase in net cash provided by investing activities was due primarily to $296.6 million
in proceeds from the sale of short-term investments, offset partially by the $53.4 million increase
in purchases of property, plant and equipment.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $298.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to $21.1 million in the same period last year. This increase in usage
is primarily the result of an approximately $303.2 million repayment on lines of credit with the
proceeds from the sale of short-term investments.
- 26 -
Debt Instruments
There have been no material changes to our debt instruments as disclosed in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, filed on March 1, 2010, except for the
changes described below.
On June 30, 2010, we put back our ARS portfolio to UBS AG at par value pursuant to the
previously disclosed settlement agreement with UBS AG. Upon exercise of the put option, we
liquidated our ARS, for cash and used the proceeds to fully repay the related no net cost loan
with UBS Bank.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any transactions, arrangements and other relationships with unconsolidated
entities that will affect our liquidity or capital resources. We have no special purpose entities
that provide off-balance sheet financing, liquidity or market or credit risk support, nor do we
engage in swap agreements, or outsourcing of research and development services, that could expose
us to liability that is not reflected on the face of our financial statements.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes in any of our contractual obligations as disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, filed on March 1, 2010.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, which
are based upon historical experiences, market trends and financial forecasts and projections, and
upon various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances
and at that certain point in time. Actual results may differ, significantly at times, from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Our critical accounting policies, as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, relate to revenue recognition, inventories, accounting for
income taxes, allowance for doubtful accounts, goodwill and long-lived assets, share-based
compensation, fair value measurements, defined benefit plan, contingencies and convertible senior
notes. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies since December 31,
2009, except that we no longer use methods of fair value to value our ARS portfolio.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note A of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for detailed
information regarding the status of recently issued accounting pronouncements.
Available Information
Our Internet address is http://www.diodes.com. We make available, free of charge through our
Internet website, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports
on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) as soon as
reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). To support our global customer-base, particularly
in Asia and Europe, our website is language-selectable into English, Chinese, and Korean, giving us
an effective marketing tool for worldwide markets. With its extensive online Product (Parametric)
Catalog with advanced search capabilities, our website facilitates quick and easy product
selection. Our website provides easy access to worldwide sales contacts and customer support, and
incorporates a distributor-inventory check to provide component inventory availability and a small
order desk for overnight sample fulfillment. Our website also provides access to investor
financial information, including SEC filings and press releases, as well as stock quotes and
information on corporate governance compliance.
- 27 -
Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the Safe Harbor Provision of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters addressed in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. We generally identify forward-looking statements by the use of terminology such
as may, will, could, should, potential, continue, expect, intend, plan,
estimate, anticipate, believe, or similar phrases or the negatives of such terms. Such
forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including those
discussed under Risks Related To Our Business and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by our management. The
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Act) provides certain safe harbor
provisions for forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements made on this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q are made pursuant to the Act.
All forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are subject to,
in addition to the other matters described in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, a variety of
significant risks and uncertainties. The following discussion highlights some of these risks and
uncertainties. Further, from time to time, information provided by us or statements made by our
employees may contain forward-looking information. There can be no assurance that actual results
or business conditions will not differ materially from those set forth or suggested in such
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed below.
For more detailed discussion of these factors, see the Risk Factors discussion in Item 1A of
the Companys most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC and in Part II, Item 1A
of this report. The forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are
made only as of the date of this report, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update the
forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
Risk Factors
Risks Related To Our Business
|
Ø |
|
The success of our business depends on the strength of the global economy and the
stability of the financial markets, and any weaknesses in these areas may have a material
adverse effect on our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
During times of difficult market conditions, our fixed costs combined with lower
revenues may have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Downturns in the highly cyclical semiconductor industry or changes in end-market demand
could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
The semiconductor business is highly competitive, and increased competition may harm our
business, results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We receive a significant portion of our net sales from a single customer. In addition,
this customer is also our largest external supplier and is a related party. The loss of
this customer or supplier could harm our business, results of operations and financial
condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Delays in initiation of production at facilities, implementing new production techniques
or resolving problems associated with technical equipment malfunctions could adversely
affect our manufacturing efficiencies, results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We are and will continue to be under continuous pressure from our customers and
competitors to reduce the price of our products, which could adversely affect our growth
and profit margins. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Our customers require our products to undergo a lengthy and expensive qualification
process without any assurance of product sales, which could adversely affect our revenues,
results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Our customer orders are subject to cancellation or modification usually with no penalty.
High volumes of order cancellation or reductions in quantities ordered could adversely
affect our results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Production at our manufacturing facilities could be disrupted for a variety of reasons,
which could prevent us from producing enough of our products to maintain our sales and
satisfy our customers demands and could adversely affect our results of operations and
financial condition. |
- 28 -
|
Ø |
|
New technologies could result in the development of new products by our competitors and
a decrease in demand for our products, and we may not be able to develop new products to
satisfy changes in demand, which could adversely affect our net sales, market share,
results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We may be adversely affected by any disruption in our information technology systems,
which could adversely affect our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We may be subject to claims of infringement of third-party intellectual property rights
or demands that we license third-party technology, which could result in significant
expense and reduction in our intellectual property rights. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We depend on third-party suppliers for timely deliveries of raw materials, parts and
equipment, as well as finished products from other manufacturers, and our reputation with
customers, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected if we
are unable to obtain adequate supplies in a timely manner. |
|
|
Ø |
|
If we do not succeed in continuing to vertically integrate our business, we will not
realize the cost and other efficiencies we anticipate, which could adversely affect our
ability to compete, profit margins, results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Part of our growth strategy involves identifying and acquiring companies with
complementary product lines or customers. We may be unable to identify suitable acquisition
candidates or consummate desired acquisitions and, if we do make any acquisitions, we may
be unable to successfully integrate any acquired companies with our operations, which could
adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We are subject to many environmental laws and regulations that could result in
significant expenses and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and
financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Our products may be found to be defective and, as a result, product liability claims may
be asserted against us, which may harm our business, reputation with our customers, results
of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We may fail to attract or retain the qualified technical, sales, marketing and
management personnel required to operate our business successfully, which could adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We may not be able to maintain our growth or achieve future growth and such growth may
place a strain on our management and on our systems and resources, which could adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Obsolete inventories as a result of changes in demand for our products and change in
life cycles of our products could adversely affect our business, results of operations and
financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
If OEMs do not design our products into their applications, a portion of our net sales may be adversely affected. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We are subject to interest rate risk that could have an adverse effect on our cost of working capital and interest expenses. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We had a significant amount of debt following the offering of convertible notes. Our
substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our business, results of operations,
financial condition and our ability to meet our payment obligations under the notes and or
other debt. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Restrictions in our credit facilities may limit our business and financial activities,
including our ability to obtain additional capital in the future. |
|
|
Ø |
|
The value of our benefit plan assets and liabilities is based on estimates and
assumptions, which may prove inaccurate and the actual amount of expenses recorded in the
consolidated financial statements could differ materially from the assumptions used. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Due to the recent fluctuations in the United Kingdoms equity markets and bond markets,
changes in actuarial assumptions for our defined benefit plan could increase the volatility
of the plans asset value, require us to increase cash contributions to the plan and have a
negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
There are risks associated with previous and future acquisitions. We may ultimately not
be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection
with acquisitions. |
- 29 -
|
Ø |
|
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls or discover material
weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to report
our financial results accurately or detect fraud, which could harm our business and the
trading price of our Common Stock. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Terrorist attacks, or threats or occurrences of other terrorist activities, whether in
the United States or internationally, may affect the markets in which our Common Stock
trades, the markets in which we operate and our results of operations and financial
condition. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Certain of our customers and suppliers require us to agree and comply with their codes
of conducts, which may include certain regulations and restrictions that may substantially
increase the cost of our business as well as have an adverse effect on operating
efficiencies, our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
Risks Related To Our International Operations
|
Ø |
|
Our international operations subject us to risks that could adversely affect our
operations. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We have significant operations and assets in China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and England and,
as a result, will be subject to risks inherent in doing business in those jurisdictions,
which may adversely affect our financial performance. |
|
|
Ø |
|
A slowdown in the Chinese economy could limit the growth in demand for electronic
devices containing our products, which would have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and prospects. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Economic regulation in China could materially and adversely affect our business, results
of operations and prospects. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We could be adversely affected by violations of the United States Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We are subject to foreign currency risk as a result of our international operations. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We may not continue to receive preferential tax treatment in Asia, thereby increasing
our income tax expense and reducing our net income. |
|
|
Ø |
|
The distribution of any earnings of our foreign subsidiaries to the United States may be
subject to U.S. income taxes, thus reducing our net income. |
|
|
Ø |
|
The Peoples Republic of China is experiencing a rapid social, political and economic
change, which has increased labor costs and other related costs that could make doing
business in China less advantageous than in prior years. Increased labor costs in China
could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
Risks Related To Our Common Stock
|
Ø |
|
Variations in our quarterly operating results may cause our stock price to be volatile. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We may enter into future acquisitions and take certain actions in connection with such
acquisitions that could adversely affect the price of our Common Stock. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders hold a substantial
portion of our Common Stock, which may lead to conflicts with other stockholders over
corporate transactions and other corporate matters. |
|
|
Ø |
|
We were formed in 1959, and our early corporate records are incomplete. As a result, we
may have difficulty in assessing and defending against claims relating to rights to our
Common Stock purporting to arise during periods for which our records are incomplete. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Conversion of our convertible senior notes will dilute the ownership interest of
existing stockholders, including stockholders who had previously converted their notes. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Non-cash tender offers, debt equity swaps or equity exchanges to consummate our business
activities are likely to have the effect of diluting the ownership interest of existing
stockholders, including qualified stockholders who receive shares of our Common Stock in
such business activities. |
- 30 -
|
Ø |
|
The repurchase rights and the increased conversion rate triggered by a make-whole
fundamental change could discourage a potential acquirer. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Anti-takeover effects of certain provisions of Delaware law and our Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws, may hinder a take-over attempt. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Section 203 of Delaware General Corporation Law may deter a take-over attempt. |
|
|
Ø |
|
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaw provisions may deter a take-over attempt. |
- 31 -
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As a multinational corporation, we are subject to certain market risks relating to foreign
currency, interest rates, political, inflation and credit. We consider a variety of practices to
manage these market risks. There have been no material changes to our market risks as disclosed in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on March 1, 2010, except
for the changes to foreign currency risks as described below.
Foreign Currency Risk
We face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily in Asia
and Europe. Our foreign currency risk may change over time as the level of activity in foreign
markets grows and could have a material adverse impact upon our financial results. Certain of our
assets, including certain bank accounts and accounts receivable, and liabilities exist in non-U.S.
dollar denominated currencies, which are sensitive to foreign currency exchange fluctuations. These
currencies are principally the Chinese Yuan, the Taiwanese dollar and the British Pound Sterling
and, to a lesser extent, the Japanese Yen, the Euro and the Hong Kong dollar. In the future, we may
enter into hedging arrangements designed to mitigate foreign currency fluctuations. See Risk
Factors We are subject to foreign currency risk as a result of our international operations. in
Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report for additional information.
Effect on Reporting Income
Certain of our subsidiaries have a functional currency that differs from the currencies in
which some of their expenses are denominated. Our income and expenses are based on a mix of
currencies and a decline in one currency relative to the other currencies could adversely affect
our results of operations. Furthermore, our results of operations are reported in U.S. dollars,
which is our reporting currency. In the event the U.S. dollar weakens against a foreign currency,
we will experience a currency transaction loss, which could adversely affect our results of
operations. If a foreign currency were to weaken or (strengthen) by 1.0% against the U.S. dollar,
we would experience currency transaction gain or (loss) of approximately $0.2 million per quarter.
Foreign Currency Transaction Risk
We also are subject to foreign currency risk arising from intercompany transactions that are
expected to be settled in cash in the near term where the cash balances are held in denominations
other than our subsidiaries functional currency. If exchange rates weaken against the functional
currency, we would incur a remeasurement gain in the value of the cash balances, and if the
exchange rates strengthen against the functional currency, we would incur a remeasurement loss in
the value of the cash balances, assuming the net monetary asset balances remained constant. Our
ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to currency fluctuations will generally depend on the
size and type of transaction, the size and currencies of the net monetary assets and the changes in
the exchange rates associated with these currencies. If the Chinese Yuan, the Taiwanese dollar,
the Euro and the British Pound Sterling were to weaken or (strengthen) by 1.0% against the U.S.
dollar, we would experience currency transaction gain or (loss) of approximately $0.3 million. Net
foreign exchange transaction gains or (losses) are included in other income and expense.
Foreign Currency Translation Risk
When our foreign subsidiaries books are maintained in their functional currency, fluctuations
in foreign currencies impact the amount of total assets and liabilities that we report for our
foreign subsidiaries upon the translation of these amounts into U.S. dollars for reporting
purposes. All elements of the subsidiaries financial statements, except for stockholders equity
accounts, are translated using a currency exchange rate. Assets and liabilities denominated in
foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Income and
expense accounts denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the weighted-average exchange
rate during the period presented. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a separate
component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss within stockholders equity in the
consolidated balance sheets, which are accumulated in this account until sale or liquidation of the
foreign entity investment, at which time they are reported as adjustments to the gain or loss on
sale of investment.
Foreign Currency Denominated Defined Benefit Plans
We have a contributory defined benefit plan that covers certain employees in the U.K. and
Germany. The defined benefit plan is closed to new entrants and frozen with respect to future
benefit accruals. The retirement benefit is based on the final average compensation and service of
each eligible employee. December 31 is our annual measurement date and on measurement date, defined
benefit plan assets are determined based on fair value. Defined benefit plan assets consist
primarily of high quality corporate bonds that are denominated in the currency in which the
benefits will be paid and that have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the related
pension liability. The net pension and supplemental retirement benefit obligations and the related
periodic costs are based on, among other things, assumptions of the discount rate, estimated return
on plan assets and mortality rates. These obligations and
- 32 -
related periodic costs are measured using actuarial techniques and assumptions. The projected
unit credit method is the actuarial cost method used to compute the pension liabilities and related
expenses.
As of September 30, 2010, the plan is underfunded and a liability of $33.8 million is
reflected in our consolidated financial statements as a noncurrent liability. The amount recognized
in accumulated other comprehensive income was a net loss of $26.9 million. If the British Pound
Sterling were to (weaken) or strengthen by 1.0% against the U.S. dollar, we would experience
currency translation liability (decrease) or increase of approximately $0.3 million. The
weighted-average discount rate assumption used to determine benefit obligations as of September 30,
2010 was 5.7%. A 0.2% increase/(decrease) in the discount rate used to calculate the net period
benefit cost for the year would reduce annual benefit cost by $0.1 million. A 0.1%
increase/(decrease) in the discount rate used to calculate the year-end projected benefit
obligation would increase/(decrease) the year-end projected benefit obligation by approximately
$2.3 million. The expected return on plan assets is determined based on historical and expected
future returns of the various assets classes and as such, each 1.0% increase/(decrease) in the
expected rate of return assumption would increase/(decrease) the net period benefit cost by
approximately $0.8 million. The asset value of the defined benefit plan has been volatile in recent
months due primarily to wide fluctuations in the U.K. equity markets and bond markets. See Risk
Factors Due to the recent fluctuations in the United Kingdoms equity markets and bond markets,
changes in actuarial assumptions for our defined benefit plan could increase the volatility of the
plans asset value, require us to increase cash contributions to the plan and have a negative
impact on our results of operations and financial condition. in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on March 1, 2010 for additional
information.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer, Keh-Shew Lu, and Chief Financial Officer, Richard D. White, with
the participation of the Companys management, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer believe that, as of the end
of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective at the reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be included
in this report is:
|
|
|
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in
the Commissions rules and forms; and |
|
|
|
|
accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions for required
disclosure. |
Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and implemented, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving an entitys disclosure objectives. The likelihood of
achieving such objectives is affected by limitations inherent in disclosure controls and
procedures. These include the fact that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that
breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human failures such as simple errors, mistakes
or intentional circumvention of the established processes.
Changes in Controls over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting, known to the Chief
Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer that occurred during the last fiscal quarter
covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
- 33 -
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, the Company is involved in various routine legal proceedings incidental to
the conduct of its business. The Company is not currently a party to any pending litigation.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Risk Factors section
of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, filed on March 1,
2010, and such changes are reflected immediately below. The following risk factors as well as the
risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, are not the only risks facing our Company.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating
results.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
Certain of our customers and suppliers require us to agree and comply with their codes of conduct,
which may include certain regulations and restrictions that may substantially increase the cost of
our business as well as have an adverse effect on operating efficiencies, our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Certain of our customers and suppliers require us to agree to comply with their codes of
conduct, which may include detailed provisions on labor, human rights, health and safety,
environment, corporate ethics and management systems. Certain of these provisions are not
requirements under the laws of the countries in which we operate but may be burdensome to comply
with on a regular basis. Moreover, new provisions may be added or material changes may be made to
any these codes of conduct, and we will have to promptly agree and implement such new provisions or
changes, which may substantially further increase the cost of our business, be burdensome to
implement and adversely affect our operating efficiencies and results of operations. If we violate
any such code of conduct, we may lose business with the customer or supplier and, in addition, we
may be subject to fines from the customer or supplier. While we believe that we are currently in
compliance with our customers and suppliers codes of conduct, there can be no assurance that, from
time to time, if any one of our customers and suppliers audits our compliance with its code of
conduct that we would be found to be in full compliance. A loss of business from these customers
or suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial conditions.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
We are subject to foreign currency risk as a result of our international operations.
We face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates, principally the
Chinese Yuan, the Taiwanese dollar and the British Pound Sterling and, to a lesser extent, the
Japanese Yen, the Euro, the Hong Kong dollar. Our income and expenses are based on a mix of
currencies and a decline in one currency relative to the other currencies could adversely affect
our results of operations. Furthermore, our results of operations are reported in U.S. dollars,
which is our reporting currency. In the event the U.S. dollar weakens against a foreign currency,
we will experience a currency transaction loss, which could adversely affect our results of
operations. Also, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may have an adverse impact and
be increasingly influential to our overall sales, profits and results of operations as amounts that
are measured in foreign currency are translated back to U. S. dollars for reporting purposes. Our
foreign currency risk may change over time as the level of activity in foreign markets grows and
could have an adverse impact upon our financial results, especially as the portion of our sales
attributable to Europe increases. We do not usually employ hedging techniques designed to mitigate
foreign currency exposures and, therefore, we could experience currency losses as these currencies
fluctuate against the U.S. dollar.
The Peoples Republic of China is experiencing a rapid social, political and economic change, which
has increased labor costs and other related costs that could make doing business in China less
advantageous than in prior years. Increased labor costs in China could adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Historically, labor in China has been readily available at a lower cost compared to other
countries, and any increase in labor cost in China has been consistent with the projected annual
increase in the inflation index and the amount of past labor cost increases. However, because China
is experiencing rapid social, political and economic change, there can be no assurance that labor
will continue to be available in China at costs consistent with historical levels. Any future
increase in labor cost in China is likely to be higher than historical and projected amounts and
may occur multiple times in any given year. As a result of experiencing such rapid
- 34 -
social, political and economic change, China is also likely to enact new, and/or revise its
existing, labor laws and regulations on employee compensation and benefits. These changes in
Chinese labor laws and regulations will likely have an adverse effect on product manufacturing
costs in China. Furthermore, if China laborers go on strike to demand higher wages, our operations
could be disrupted. Many of our suppliers are currently dealing with labor shortages in China,
which may result in future supply delays and disruptions and may drive a substantial increase in
their labor costs that is likely to be shared by us in the form of price increases to us. New or
revised government labor laws or regulations, strikes or labor shortages could cause our product
costs to rise and/or could cause manufacturing partners on whom we rely to exit the business. These
events could have an adverse impact on our product availability and quality, which would affect our
business, results of operations and financial conditions.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
We may from time to time seek to repurchase our outstanding Notes in the open market, in
privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on
prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other
factors. The amounts involved may be material.
There have been no repurchases of our Notes or common stock during the third quarter of 2010.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
There are no matters to be reported under this heading.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
There are no matters to be reported under this heading.
- 35 -
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Attached |
Number |
|
Description |
|
Form |
|
Date of First Filing |
|
Number |
|
Herewith |
3.1 |
|
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended |
|
S-3 |
|
September 8, 2005 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Amended By-laws of the Company dated July 19, 2007 |
|
8-K |
|
July 23, 2007 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Form of Certificate for Common Stock, par value
$0.66 2/3 per share |
|
S-3 |
|
August 25, 2005 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Form of 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 |
|
S-3 |
|
October 4, 2006 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Form of Indenture for the 2.25% Convertible Senior
Notes due 2026 |
|
S-3 |
|
October 4, 2006 |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Second Floor of the Accommodation Building Lease
Agreement, dated September 1, 2010, between
Shanghai Kaihong Technology Company Limited and
Shanghai Ding Hong Electronic Company Limited. |
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Security Guards Transfer Memorandum of
Understanding, dated September 1, 2010, between
Diodes Shanghai Company Limited and Shanghai Yuan
Hao Electronic Company Limited. |
|
10-Q |
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Investment Cooperation Agreement effective as of
September 10, 2010, between Diodes Hong Kong
Holding Company Limited and the Management
Committee of the Chengdu Hi-Tech Industrial
Development Zone. |
|
8-K |
|
September 16, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Supplementary Agreement to the Investment
Cooperation Agreement effective as of September
10, 2010, between Diodes Hong Kong Holding Company
Limited and the Management Committee of the
Chengdu Hi-Tech Industrial Development Zone. |
|
8-K |
|
September 16, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1* |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2* |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS** |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH** |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL** |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB** |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE** |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 36 -
|
|
|
* |
|
A certification furnished pursuant to Item 601 of the Regulation S-K will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference. |
|
** |
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or
prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and otherwise are not subject to liability. |
PLEASE NOTE: It is inappropriate for investors to assume the accuracy of any covenants,
representations or warranties that may be contained in agreements or other documents filed as
exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In certain instances the disclosure schedules to
such agreements or documents contain information that modifies, qualifies and creates exceptions to
the representations, warranties and covenants. Moreover, some of the representations and warranties
may not be complete or accurate as of a particular date because they are subject to a contractual
standard of materiality that is different from those generally applicable to stockholders and/or
were used for the purpose of allocating risk among the parties rather than establishing certain
matters as facts. Accordingly, you should not rely on the representations and warranties as
characterizations of the actual state of facts at the time they were made or otherwise.
- 37 -
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
DIODES INCORPORATED (Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Richard D. White |
|
November 9, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
RICHARD D. WHITE
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and
Chief Accounting Officer) |
|
|
- 38 -