National Fuel Gas Company 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-3880
NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
13-1086010 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
6363 Main Street |
|
|
Williamsville, New York
|
|
14221 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(716) 857-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date:
Common stock, $1 par value, outstanding at July 31, 2007: 83,549,949 shares.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Frequently used abbreviations, acronyms, or terms used in this report:
|
|
|
National Fuel Gas Companies |
|
|
Company
|
|
The Registrant, the Registrant and its subsidiaries or the Registrants
subsidiaries as appropriate in the context of the disclosure |
Data-Track
|
|
Data-Track Account Services, Inc. |
Distribution Corporation
|
|
National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation |
Empire
|
|
Empire State Pipeline |
ESNE
|
|
Energy Systems North East, LLC |
Highland
|
|
Highland Forest Resources, Inc. |
Horizon
|
|
Horizon Energy Development, Inc. |
Horizon LFG
|
|
Horizon LFG, Inc. |
Horizon Power
|
|
Horizon Power, Inc. |
Leidy Hub
|
|
Leidy Hub, Inc. |
Model City
|
|
Model City Energy, LLC |
National Fuel
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company |
NFR
|
|
National Fuel Resources, Inc. |
Registrant
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company |
SECI
|
|
Seneca Energy Canada Inc. |
Seneca
|
|
Seneca Resources Corporation |
Seneca Energy
|
|
Seneca Energy II, LLC |
Supply Corporation
|
|
National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation |
|
|
|
Regulatory Agencies |
|
|
FASB
|
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC
|
|
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
NTSB
|
|
National Transportation Safety Board |
NYDEC
|
|
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation |
NYPSC
|
|
State of New York Public Service Commission |
PaPUC
|
|
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission |
SEC
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
2006 Form 10-K
|
|
The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006 |
Bbl
|
|
Barrel (of oil) |
Bcf
|
|
Billion cubic feet (of natural gas) |
Board foot
|
|
A measure of lumber and/or timber equal to 12 inches in length by 12
inches in width by one inch in thickness. |
Btu
|
|
British thermal unit; the amount of heat needed to raise the temperature
of one pound of water one degree Fahrenheit. |
Capital expenditure
|
|
Represents additions to property, plant, and equipment, or the amount of
money a company spends to buy capital assets or upgrade its existing
capital assets. |
Cashout revenues
|
|
A cash resolution of a gas imbalance whereby a customer pays Supply
Corporation for gas the customer receives in excess of amounts
delivered into Supply Corporations system by the customers shipper. |
Degree day
|
|
A measure of the coldness of the weather experienced, based on the
extent to which the daily average temperature falls below a reference
temperature, usually 65 degrees Fahrenheit. |
Derivative
|
|
A financial instrument or other contract, the terms of which include an
underlying variable (a price, interest rate, index rate, exchange rate, or
other variable) and a notional amount (number of units, barrels, cubic
feet, etc.). The terms also permit for the instrument or contract to be
settled net and no initial net investment is required to enter into the
financial instrument or contract. Examples include futures contracts,
options, no cost collars and swaps. |
Dth
|
|
Decatherm; one Dth of natural gas has a heating value of 1,000,000
British thermal units, approximately equal to the heating value of 1 Mcf
of natural gas. |
-2-
|
|
|
GLOSSARY OF
TERMS (Cont.) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Act
|
|
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
Expenditures for
long-lived assets
|
|
Includes capital expenditures, stock acquisitions and/or investments in
partnerships. |
FIN
|
|
FASB Interpretation Number |
FIN 48
|
|
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
- an interpretation of SFAS 109 |
Firm transportation
and/or storage
|
|
The transportation and/or storage service that a supplier of such service
is obligated by contract to provide and for which the customer is
obligated to pay whether or not the service is utilized. |
GAAP
|
|
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America |
Goodwill
|
|
An intangible asset representing the difference between the fair value of
a company and the price at which a company is purchased. |
Hedging
|
|
A method of minimizing the impact of price, interest rate, and/or foreign
currency exchange rate changes, often times through the use of
derivative financial instruments. |
Hub
|
|
Location where pipelines intersect enabling the trading, transportation,
storage, exchange, lending and borrowing of natural gas. |
Interruptible transportation
and/or storage
|
|
The transportation and/or storage service that, in accordance with
contractual arrangements, can be interrupted by the supplier of such
service, and for which the customer does not pay unless utilized. |
LIFO
|
|
Last-in, first-out |
Mbbl
|
|
Thousand barrels (of oil) |
Mcf
|
|
Thousand cubic feet (of natural gas) |
MD&A
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations |
MDth
|
|
Thousand decatherms (of natural gas) |
MMcf
|
|
Million cubic feet (of natural gas) |
Precedent Agreement
|
|
An agreement between a pipeline company and a potential customer to
sign a service agreement after specified events (called
conditions precedent) happen, usually within a specified time. |
Proved developed reserves
|
|
Reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells
with existing equipment and operating methods. |
Proved undeveloped
reserves
|
|
Reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled
acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major
expenditure is
required to make these reserves productive. |
Reserves
|
|
The unproduced but recoverable oil and/or gas in place in a formation
which has been proven by production. |
Restructuring
|
|
Generally referring to partial deregulation of the utility industry by a
statutory or regulatory process. Restructuring of federally regulated
natural gas pipelines has resulted in the separation (or unbundling)
of
gas commodity service from transportation service for wholesale and
large-volume retail markets. State restructuring programs attempt to
extend the same process to retail mass markets. |
SAR
|
|
Stock-settled stock appreciation right |
SFAS
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards |
SFAS 87
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, Employers
Accounting for Pensions |
SFAS 88
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 88, Employers
Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit
Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits |
SFAS 106
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106, Employers Accounting
for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions |
SFAS 109
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes |
SFAS 115
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities |
-3-
|
|
|
GLOSSARY OF
TERMS (Concl.) |
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS 123R
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment |
SFAS 132R
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 132R, Employers
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits |
SFAS 157
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements |
SFAS 158
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans, an amendment of SFAS 87, 88, 106, and 132R |
SFAS 159
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an
Amendment of SFAS 115 |
Stock acquisitions
|
|
Investments in corporations. |
Unbundled service
|
|
A service that has been separated from other services, with rates
charged that reflect only the cost of the separated service. |
WNC
|
|
Weather normalization clause; a clause in utility rates which adjusts
customer rates to allow a utility to recover its normal operating costs
calculated at normal temperatures. If temperatures during the
measured period are warmer than normal, customer rates are adjusted
upward in order to recover projected operating costs. If
temperatures
during the measured period are colder than normal, customer
rates
are adjusted downward so that only the projected operating costs
will
be recovered. |
-4-
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 - 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 - 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 - 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 - 43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 - 44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 - 45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 - 46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
|
|
§ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
|
|
§ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. Other Information |
|
|
§ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
EX-12 |
EX-31.1 |
EX-31.2 |
EX-32 |
EX-99 |
§ |
|
The Company has nothing to report under this item. |
Reference to the Company in this report means the Registrant or the Registrant and its
subsidiaries collectively, as appropriate in the context of the disclosure. All references to a
certain year in this report are to the Companys fiscal year ended September 30 of that year,
unless otherwise noted.
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements should be read with the cautionary
statements and important factors included in this Form 10-Q at Item 2 MD&A, under the heading
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements. Forward-looking statements are all statements other
than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, those statements that are
designated with an
asterisk (*) following the statement, as well as those statements that are identified by the use
of the words anticipates, estimates, expects, intends, plans, predicts, projects, and
similar expressions.
-5-
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Statements of Income and Earnings
Reinvested in the Business
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Common Share Amounts) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
$ |
463,145 |
|
|
$ |
415,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased Gas |
|
|
219,075 |
|
|
|
184,635 |
|
Operation and Maintenance |
|
|
96,782 |
|
|
|
96,117 |
|
Property, Franchise and Other Taxes |
|
|
17,804 |
|
|
|
16,845 |
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization |
|
|
41,100 |
|
|
|
46,943 |
|
Impairment of Oil and Gas Producing Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
374,761 |
|
|
|
406,911 |
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
88,384 |
|
|
|
8,541 |
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries |
|
|
926 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
Other Income |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
Interest Expense on Long-Term Debt |
|
|
(18,226 |
) |
|
|
(18,135 |
) |
Other Interest Expense |
|
|
(1,512 |
) |
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes |
|
|
72,008 |
|
|
|
(7,656 |
) |
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) |
|
|
25,210 |
|
|
|
(7,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
|
46,798 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS REINVESTED IN THE BUSINESS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 1 |
|
|
834,902 |
|
|
|
877,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
881,700 |
|
|
|
877,710 |
|
Share Repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,766 |
|
Dividends on Common Stock
(2007 - $0.31 per share; 2006 - $0.30 per share) |
|
|
25,897 |
|
|
|
24,993 |
|
|
Balance at June 30 |
|
$ |
855,803 |
|
|
$ |
807,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used in Basic Calculation |
|
|
83,483,718 |
|
|
|
84,013,556 |
|
|
Used in Diluted Calculation |
|
|
85,668,055 |
|
|
|
86,016,131 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-6-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Statements of Income and Earnings
Reinvested in the Business
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Common Share Amounts) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
$ |
1,779,541 |
|
|
$ |
2,017,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased Gas |
|
|
938,918 |
|
|
|
1,187,952 |
|
Operation and Maintenance |
|
|
321,695 |
|
|
|
320,821 |
|
Property, Franchise and Other Taxes |
|
|
55,149 |
|
|
|
54,147 |
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization |
|
|
125,986 |
|
|
|
134,267 |
|
Impairment of Oil and Gas Producing Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,441,748 |
|
|
|
1,759,558 |
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
337,793 |
|
|
|
257,631 |
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries |
|
|
3,099 |
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
3,897 |
|
|
|
4,301 |
|
Other Income |
|
|
4,028 |
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
Interest Expense on Long-Term Debt |
|
|
(52,158 |
) |
|
|
(54,502 |
) |
Other Interest Expense |
|
|
(4,877 |
) |
|
|
(4,266 |
) |
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
291,782 |
|
|
|
206,898 |
|
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
112,017 |
|
|
|
70,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
|
179,765 |
|
|
|
136,123 |
|
|
EARNINGS REINVESTED IN THE BUSINESS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 1 |
|
|
786,013 |
|
|
|
813,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
965,778 |
|
|
|
949,143 |
|
Share Repurchases |
|
|
34,351 |
|
|
|
67,384 |
|
Dividends on Common Stock
(2007 - $0.91; 2006 - $0.88) |
|
|
75,624 |
|
|
|
73,808 |
|
|
Balance at June 30 |
|
$ |
855,803 |
|
|
$ |
807,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
2.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
2.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used in Basic Calculation |
|
|
83,018,583 |
|
|
|
84,231,490 |
|
|
Used in Diluted Calculation |
|
|
85,192,777 |
|
|
|
86,150,927 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-7-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
$ |
4,928,627 |
|
|
$ |
4,703,040 |
|
Less Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion
and Amortization |
|
|
1,960,265 |
|
|
|
1,825,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,968,362 |
|
|
|
2,877,726 |
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments |
|
|
62,530 |
|
|
|
69,611 |
|
Hedging Collateral Deposits |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
19,676 |
|
Receivables Net of Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts of
$34,107 and $31,427, Respectively |
|
|
222,249 |
|
|
|
144,254 |
|
Unbilled Utility Revenue |
|
|
20,569 |
|
|
|
25,538 |
|
Gas Stored Underground |
|
|
30,829 |
|
|
|
59,461 |
|
Materials and Supplies at average cost |
|
|
30,621 |
|
|
|
36,693 |
|
Unrecovered Purchased Gas Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,970 |
|
Prepaid Pension and Post-Retirement Benefit Costs |
|
|
70,858 |
|
|
|
64,125 |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
26,324 |
|
|
|
63,723 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
21,271 |
|
|
|
23,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
488,651 |
|
|
|
519,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverable Future Taxes |
|
|
79,010 |
|
|
|
79,511 |
|
Unamortized Debt Expense |
|
|
12,555 |
|
|
|
15,492 |
|
Other Regulatory Assets |
|
|
84,325 |
|
|
|
76,917 |
|
Deferred Charges |
|
|
5,861 |
|
|
|
3,558 |
|
Other Investments |
|
|
83,444 |
|
|
|
88,414 |
|
Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries |
|
|
16,377 |
|
|
|
11,590 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
5,476 |
|
Intangible Assets |
|
|
29,757 |
|
|
|
31,498 |
|
Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
6,170 |
|
|
|
11,305 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
5,421 |
|
|
|
9,003 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,716 |
|
|
|
4,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
336,112 |
|
|
|
337,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
3,793,125 |
|
|
$ |
3,734,331 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-8-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1 Par Value
Authorized - 200,000,000 Shares; Issued
and Outstanding - 83,536,549 Shares and
83,402,670 Shares, Respectively |
|
$ |
83,537 |
|
|
$ |
83,403 |
|
Paid in Capital |
|
|
568,537 |
|
|
|
543,730 |
|
Earnings Reinvested in the Business |
|
|
855,803 |
|
|
|
786,013 |
|
|
Total Common Shareholder Equity Before
Items of Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
1,507,877 |
|
|
|
1,413,146 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
43,984 |
|
|
|
30,416 |
|
|
Total Comprehensive Shareholders Equity |
|
|
1,551,861 |
|
|
|
1,443,562 |
|
Long-Term Debt, Net of Current Portion |
|
|
799,000 |
|
|
|
1,095,675 |
|
|
Total Capitalization |
|
|
2,350,861 |
|
|
|
2,539,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Payable to Banks and Commercial Paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt |
|
|
200,050 |
|
|
|
22,925 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
120,978 |
|
|
|
133,034 |
|
Amounts Payable to Customers |
|
|
19,197 |
|
|
|
23,935 |
|
Dividends Payable |
|
|
25,897 |
|
|
|
25,008 |
|
Interest Payable on Long-Term Debt |
|
|
13,541 |
|
|
|
18,420 |
|
Other Accruals and Current Liabilities |
|
|
96,587 |
|
|
|
27,040 |
|
Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
17,133 |
|
|
|
39,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
493,383 |
|
|
|
290,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Credits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
566,133 |
|
|
|
544,502 |
|
Taxes Refundable to Customers |
|
|
10,437 |
|
|
|
10,426 |
|
Unamortized Investment Tax Credit |
|
|
5,568 |
|
|
|
6,094 |
|
Cost of Removal Regulatory Liability |
|
|
88,949 |
|
|
|
85,076 |
|
Other Regulatory Liabilities |
|
|
73,212 |
|
|
|
75,456 |
|
Post-Retirement Liabilities |
|
|
24,310 |
|
|
|
32,918 |
|
Asset Retirement Obligations |
|
|
80,739 |
|
|
|
77,392 |
|
Other Deferred Credits |
|
|
99,533 |
|
|
|
72,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
948,881 |
|
|
|
904,749 |
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capitalization and Liabilities |
|
$ |
3,793,125 |
|
|
$ |
3,734,331 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-9-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
179,765 |
|
|
$ |
136,123 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash
Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Oil and Gas Producing Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,371 |
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization |
|
|
125,986 |
|
|
|
134,267 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
27,107 |
|
|
|
(17,430 |
) |
Income from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Net of
Cash Distributions |
|
|
(1,486 |
) |
|
|
2,452 |
|
Excess Tax Benefits Associated with Stock-Based
Compensation Awards |
|
|
(13,689 |
) |
|
|
(6,515 |
) |
Other |
|
|
4,722 |
|
|
|
(6,493 |
) |
Change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Collateral Deposits |
|
|
16,276 |
|
|
|
63,100 |
|
Receivables and Unbilled Utility Revenue |
|
|
(73,150 |
) |
|
|
(72,496 |
) |
Gas Stored Underground and Materials and Supplies |
|
|
34,725 |
|
|
|
21,098 |
|
Unrecovered Purchased Gas Costs |
|
|
12,970 |
|
|
|
14,817 |
|
Prepayments and Other Current Assets |
|
|
30,685 |
|
|
|
21,800 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
(12,560 |
) |
|
|
(24,650 |
) |
Amounts Payable to Customers |
|
|
(4,738 |
) |
|
|
30,418 |
|
Other Accruals and Current Liabilities |
|
|
77,842 |
|
|
|
49,950 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
(15,753 |
) |
Other Liabilities |
|
|
(821 |
) |
|
|
16,855 |
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
404,552 |
|
|
|
409,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
|
(206,509 |
) |
|
|
(218,658 |
) |
Investment in Partnership |
|
|
(3,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds from Sale of Oil and Gas Producing Properties |
|
|
5,137 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other |
|
|
(1,072 |
) |
|
|
(1,578 |
) |
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(205,744 |
) |
|
|
(220,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Tax Benefits Associated with Stock-Based
Compensation Awards |
|
|
13,689 |
|
|
|
6,515 |
|
Shares Repurchased under Repurchase Plan |
|
|
(43,344 |
) |
|
|
(76,540 |
) |
Reduction of Long-Term Debt |
|
|
(119,550 |
) |
|
|
(7,157 |
) |
Dividends Paid on Common Stock |
|
|
(74,748 |
) |
|
|
(73,275 |
) |
Net Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
16,819 |
|
|
|
23,399 |
|
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities |
|
|
(207,134 |
) |
|
|
(127,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash |
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Temporary Cash
Investments |
|
|
(7,081 |
) |
|
|
64,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments at October 1 |
|
|
69,611 |
|
|
|
57,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments at June 30 |
|
$ |
62,530 |
|
|
$ |
121,626 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-10-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
46,798 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
|
10,029 |
|
|
|
8,292 |
|
Unrealized Gain on Securities Available for Sale
Arising During the Period |
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Financial Instruments
Arising During the Period |
|
|
13,343 |
|
|
|
(2,340 |
) |
Reclassification Adjustment for Realized Losses on
Derivative Financial Instruments in Net Income |
|
|
5,581 |
|
|
|
14,687 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income, Before Tax |
|
|
30,523 |
|
|
|
21,765 |
|
|
Income Tax Expense Related to Unrealized Gain on
Securities Available for Sale Arising During the Period |
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) Related to Unrealized Gain (Loss)
On Derivative Financial Instruments Arising During the Period |
|
|
5,433 |
|
|
|
(931 |
) |
Reclassification Adjustment for Income Tax Benefit on
Realized Losses on Derivative Financial Instruments
In Net Income |
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
|
5,668 |
|
|
Income Taxes Net |
|
|
8,272 |
|
|
|
5,128 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
22,251 |
|
|
|
16,637 |
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
69,049 |
|
|
$ |
16,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
179,765 |
|
|
$ |
136,123 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
|
6,384 |
|
|
|
7,556 |
|
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gain on Securities Available for Sale
Arising During the Period |
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
3,388 |
|
Unrealized Gain on Derivative Financial Instruments
Arising During the Period |
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
60,275 |
|
Reclassification Adjustment for Realized Losses on
Derivative Financial Instruments in Net Income |
|
|
7,799 |
|
|
|
78,412 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income, Before Tax |
|
|
19,095 |
|
|
|
149,631 |
|
|
Income Tax Expense Related to Minimum Pension
Liability Adjustment |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense Related to Unrealized Gain on
Securities Available for Sale Arising During the Period |
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
Income Tax Expense Related to Unrealized Gain on
Derivative Financial Instruments Arising During the Period |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
23,178 |
|
Reclassification Adjustment for Income Tax Benefit on
Realized Losses on Derivative Financial Instruments
In Net Income |
|
|
3,933 |
|
|
|
30,253 |
|
|
Income Taxes Net |
|
|
5,527 |
|
|
|
54,614 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
13,568 |
|
|
|
95,017 |
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
193,333 |
|
|
$ |
231,140 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-11-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation. The Company consolidates its majority owned entities. The equity
method is used to account for minority owned entities. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions are eliminated.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Earnings for Interim Periods. The Company, in its opinion, has included all adjustments that are
necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for the reported periods. The
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included herein, should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 that
are included in the Companys 2006 Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements for the year
ended September 30, 2007 will be audited by the Companys independent registered public accounting
firm after the end of the fiscal year.
The earnings for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 should not be taken as a prediction of
earnings for the entire fiscal year ending September 30, 2007. Most of the business of the Utility
and Energy Marketing segments is seasonal in nature and is influenced by weather conditions. Due
to the seasonal nature of the heating business in the Utility and Energy Marketing segments,
earnings during the winter months normally represent a substantial part of the earnings that those
segments are expected to achieve for the entire fiscal year. The Companys business segments are
discussed more fully in Note 5 Business Segment Information.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. For purposes of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows,
the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of generally
three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Hedging Collateral Deposits. Cash held in margin accounts serve as collateral for open positions
on exchange-traded futures contracts, exchange-traded options and over-the-counter swaps and
collars.
Gas Stored Underground Current. In the Utility segment, gas stored underground current is
carried at lower of cost or market, on a LIFO method. Gas stored underground current normally
declines during the first and second quarters of the year and is replenished during the third and
fourth quarters. In the Utility segment, the current cost of replacing gas withdrawn from storage
is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income and a reserve for gas replacement is recorded
in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under the caption Other Accruals and Current Liabilities.
Such reserve, which amounted to $55.8 million at June 30, 2007, is reduced to zero by September 30
of each year as the inventory is replenished.
Property, Plant and Equipment. Oil and gas property acquisition, exploration and development costs
are capitalized under the full-cost method of accounting. All costs directly associated with
property acquisition, exploration and development activities are capitalized, up to certain
specified limits. If capitalized costs exceed these limits at the end of any quarter, a permanent
impairment is required to be charged to earnings in that quarter. The Companys capitalized costs
exceeded the full-cost ceiling for the Companys Canadian properties at June 30, 2006. As such,
the Company recognized an impairment of $62.4 million at June 30, 2006. No such impairment
occurred during the quarter or nine months ended June 30, 2007.
-12-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,
net of related tax effect, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2007 |
|
|
At September 30, 2006 |
|
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment |
|
$ |
(199 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Cumulative Foreign Currency
Translation Adjustment |
|
|
41,085 |
|
|
|
34,701 |
|
Net Unrealized Loss on Derivative
Financial Instruments |
|
|
(5,925 |
) |
|
|
(11,510 |
) |
Net Unrealized Gain on Securities
Available for Sale |
|
|
9,023 |
|
|
|
7,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
43,984 |
|
|
$ |
30,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Common Share. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing income
available for common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted earnings per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
For purposes of determining earnings per common share, the only potentially dilutive securities the
Company has outstanding are stock options and stock-settled SARs. The diluted weighted average
shares outstanding shown on the Consolidated Statements of Income reflects the potential dilution
as a result of these stock options and stock-settled SARs as determined using the Treasury Stock
Method. Stock options and stock-settled SARs that are antidilutive are excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per common share. For the quarter and nine months ended June 30,
2007, there were no stock options excluded as being antidilutive. There were 1,817 and 271
stock-settled SARs excluded as being antidilutive for the quarter and nine months ended June 30,
2007, respectively. For the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2006, 171,429 and 57,143 stock
options, respectively, were excluded as being antidilutive. There were no stock-settled SARs
excluded as being antidilutive for the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2006.
Share Repurchases. The Company considers all shares repurchased as cancelled shares restored to
the status of authorized but unissued shares, in accordance with New Jersey law. The repurchases
are accounted for on the date the share repurchase is settled as an adjustment to common stock (at
par value) with the excess repurchase price allocated between paid in capital and retained
earnings. Refer to Note 3 Capitalization for further discussion of the share repurchase program.
Stock-Based Compensation. For the nine months ended June 30, 2007, the Company granted 50,000
stock-settled SARs having a weighted average exercise price of $41.20 per share. The weighted
average grant date fair value of these stock-settled SARs was $7.81 per share for the nine months
ended June 30, 2007. There were no stock-settled SARs granted for the quarter ended June 30, 2007.
The accounting treatment for such stock-settled SARs is the same under SFAS 123R as the accounting
for stock options under SFAS 123R. During the nine months ended June 30, 2007, the Company granted
448,000 stock options having a weighted average exercise price of $39.48 per share. The weighted
average grant date fair value of such options was $7.27 per share for the nine months ended June
30, 2007. There were no stock options granted during the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The Company
also granted 25,000 restricted share awards (non-vested stock as defined in SFAS 123R) during the
nine months ended June 30, 2007. The weighted average fair values of such restricted shares were
$40.18 per share for the nine months ended June 30, 2007. There were no restricted share awards
granted during the quarter ended June 30, 2007.
New Accounting Pronouncements. In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum
probability threshold that a tax position must meet before a financial statement benefit is
recognized. The minimum threshold is defined in FIN 48 as a tax position that is more likely than
not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of
any related appeals or litigation
processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The cumulative effect of
applying FIN 48 at
-13-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
adoption, if any, is to be reported as an adjustment to opening retained earnings for the year of
adoption. FIN 48 is effective for the first quarter of the Companys 2008 fiscal year. The
Company is currently assessing the potential effect of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 provides
guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The pronouncement serves to
clarify the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information
used to measure fair value, and the effect that fair-value measurements have on earnings. SFAS 157
is to be applied whenever another standard requires or allows assets or liabilities to be measured
at fair value. The pronouncement is effective as of the Companys first quarter of fiscal 2009.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB also issued SFAS 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (an amendment of SFAS 87, SFAS 88, SFAS 106, and SFAS
132R). SFAS 158 requires that companies recognize a net liability or asset to report the
underfunded or overfunded status of their defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit
plans on their balance sheets, as well as recognize changes in the funded status of a defined
benefit post-retirement plan in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income.
The pronouncement also specifies that a plans assets and obligations that determine its funded
status be measured as of the end of the Companys fiscal year, with limited exceptions. The
Company is required to recognize the funded status of its benefit plans and the disclosure
requirements of SFAS 158 by the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. The requirement to measure the plan
assets and benefit obligations as of the Companys fiscal year-end date will be adopted by the
Company by the end of fiscal 2009. Currently, the Company measures its plan assets and benefit
obligations using a June 30th measurement date. If the Company recognized the funded
status of its pension and post-retirement benefit plans at September 30, 2006, the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheet would reflect a liability of $232.5 million instead of the prepaid
pension and post-retirement costs of $64.1 million and post-retirement liabilities of $32.9 million
that were presented on the balance sheet at September 30, 2006. The Company expects that it will
record a regulatory asset for the majority of this liability with the remainder reflected in
accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company will recalculate the funded status of its
pension and post-retirement benefit plans during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of SFAS 115. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose
to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not otherwise
required to be measured at fair value under GAAP. A company that elects the fair value option for
an eligible item will be required to recognize in current earnings any changes in that items fair
value in reporting periods subsequent to the date of adoption. SFAS 159 is effective as of the
Companys first quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any,
that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 2 Income Taxes
The components of federal, state and foreign income taxes included in the Consolidated
Statements of Income are as follows (in thousands):
-14-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
65,629 |
|
|
$ |
68,914 |
|
State |
|
|
19,259 |
|
|
|
17,079 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
18,221 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
State |
|
|
5,270 |
|
|
|
1,519 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
3,616 |
|
|
|
(21,376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,017 |
|
|
|
70,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Investment Tax Credit |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Taxes |
|
$ |
111,494 |
|
|
$ |
70,252 |
|
|
|
|
The U.S. and foreign components of income (loss) before income taxes are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
275,196 |
|
|
$ |
248,226 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
16,063 |
|
|
|
(41,851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
291,259 |
|
|
$ |
206,375 |
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes as reported differ from the amounts that were computed by applying the
federal income tax rate to income before income taxes. The following is a reconciliation of this
difference (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense, Computed at
Statutory Rate of 35% |
|
$ |
101,941 |
|
|
$ |
72,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Reduction) in Taxes Resulting From: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State Income Taxes |
|
|
15,944 |
|
|
|
12,089 |
|
Foreign Tax Differential |
|
|
(2,069 |
) |
|
|
(5,211 |
)(1) |
Reversal of Capital Loss Valuation Allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,877 |
) |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
(4,322 |
) |
|
|
(5,980 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Taxes |
|
$ |
111,494 |
|
|
$ |
70,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes a $5.1 million deferred tax benefit relating to additional future tax
deductions forecasted in the Exploration and Production segments Canadian division. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes a net reversal of $3.2 million relating to a tax contingency
reserve. |
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax liabilities and assets were as
follows (in thousands):
-15-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2007 |
|
At September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
$ |
600,801 |
|
|
$ |
569,677 |
|
Other |
|
|
34,750 |
|
|
|
37,865 |
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities |
|
|
635,551 |
|
|
|
607,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Loss Carryover |
|
|
(4,909 |
) |
|
|
(8,786 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(91,201 |
) |
|
|
(86,659 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets |
|
|
(96,110 |
) |
|
|
(95,445 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Net Deferred Income Taxes |
|
$ |
539,441 |
|
|
$ |
512,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presented as Follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Asset Current |
|
$ |
(21,271 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,402 |
) |
Net Deferred Tax Asset Non-Current |
|
|
(5,421 |
) |
|
|
(9,003 |
) |
Net Deferred Tax Liability Non-Current |
|
|
566,133 |
|
|
|
544,502 |
|
|
|
|
Total Net Deferred Income Taxes |
|
$ |
539,441 |
|
|
$ |
512,097 |
|
|
|
|
Regulatory liabilities representing the reduction of previously recorded deferred income taxes
with rate-regulated activities that are expected to be refundable to customers amounted to $10.4
million at both June 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006. Also, regulatory assets representing future
amounts collectible from customers, corresponding to additional deferred income taxes not
previously recorded because of prior ratemaking practices, amounted to $79.0 million and $79.5
million at June 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively.
A capital loss carryover of $14.0 million existed at June 30, 2007, which expires if not
utilized by September 30, 2008. Although realization is not assured, management determined that it
is more likely than not that the entire deferred tax asset associated with this carryover will be
realized during the carryover period, and as such, no valuation allowance has been provided.
A deferred tax asset of $5.4 million and $9.0 million relating to Canadian operations existed
at June 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively. Although realization is not assured,
management determined that it is more likely than not that future taxable income will be generated
in Canada to fully utilize this asset, and as such, no valuation allowance has been provided.
Note 3 Capitalization
Common Stock. During the nine months ended June 30, 2007, the Company issued 2,011,559 original
issue shares of common stock as a result of stock option exercises and 25,000 original issue shares
for restricted stock awards (non-vested stock as defined in SFAS 123R). The Company also issued
6,746 original issue shares of common stock to the non-employee directors of the Company as partial
consideration for the directors services during the nine months ended June 30, 2007. Holders of
stock options or restricted stock will often tender shares of common stock to the Company for
payment of option exercise prices and/or applicable withholding taxes. During the nine months
ended June 30, 2007, 714,098 shares of common stock were tendered to the Company for such purposes.
The Company considers all shares tendered as cancelled shares restored to the status of authorized
but unissued shares, in accordance with New Jersey law.
On December 8, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the Company to implement a
share repurchase program, whereby the Company may repurchase outstanding shares of common stock, up
to an aggregate amount of 8 million shares in the open market or through privately negotiated
transactions. During the nine months ended June 30, 2007, the Company repurchased 1,195,328 shares
for $43.3 million under this program, funded with cash provided by operating activities and/or
through the use of the Companys bi-lateral lines of credit. Since the repurchase program was
implemented, the Company has repurchased 3,721,878 shares for $128.5 million.
-16-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
Long-Term Debt. On December 8, 2006, the Company repaid $22.8 million of Empires secured debt.
Such amount was classified as Current Portion of Long-Term Debt on the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheet at September 30, 2006.
On April 30, 2007, the Company redeemed $96.3 million of 6.5% unsecured notes, plus accrued
interest. These notes were redeemable by the Company at par at any time after September 15, 2006.
Note 4 Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental Matters. The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws and
regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The Company has established procedures
for the ongoing evaluation of its operations to identify potential environmental exposures and
comply with regulatory policies and procedures. It is the Companys policy to accrue estimated
environmental clean-up costs (investigation and remediation) when such amounts can reasonably be
estimated and it is probable that the Company will be required to incur such costs.
As disclosed in Note H of the Companys 2006 Form 10-K, the Company received, in 1998 and
again in October 1999, notice that the NYDEC believes the Company is responsible for contamination
discovered at a former manufactured gas plant site in New York for which the Company had not been
named as a potentially responsible party. In February 2007, the NYDEC identified the Company as a
potentially responsible party for the site and issued a proposed remedial action plan. The NYDEC
estimated clean-up costs under its proposed remedy to be $8.9 million if implemented. Although the
Company commented to the NYDEC that the proposed remedial action plan contained a number of
material errors, omissions and procedural defects, the NYDEC, in a March 2007 Record of Decision,
selected the remedy it had previously proposed. In July 2007, the Company appealed the NYDECs
Record of Decision to the New York State Supreme Court, Albany County. The Company believes that a
negotiated resolution with the NYDEC regarding the site remains possible.
At June 30, 2007, the Company has estimated its remaining clean-up costs related to former
manufactured gas plant sites and third party waste disposal sites (including the former
manufactured gas plant site discussed above) will be in the range of $12.3 million to $16.0
million. The minimum estimated liability of $12.3 million has been recorded on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet at June 30, 2007. The Company expects to recover its environmental clean-up costs
from a combination of rate recovery and insurance proceeds.
The Company is currently not aware of any material additional exposure to environmental
liabilities. However, changes in environmental regulations or other factors could adversely impact
the Company.
Other. The Company is involved in other litigation and regulatory matters arising in the normal
course of business. These other matters may include, for example, negligence claims and tax,
regulatory or other governmental audits, inspections, investigations and other proceedings. These
matters may involve state and federal taxes, safety, compliance with regulations, rate base, cost
of service and purchased gas cost issues, among other things. While these normal-course matters
could have a material effect on earnings and cash flows in the quarterly and annual period in which
they are resolved, they are not expected to change materially the Companys present liquidity
position, nor to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.
-17-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
Note 5 Business Segment Information
The Company has five reportable segments: Utility, Pipeline and Storage, Exploration and
Production, Energy Marketing, and Timber. The division of the Companys operations into the
reportable segments is based upon a combination of factors including differences in products and
services, regulatory environment and geographic factors.
The data presented in the tables below reflect the reportable segments and reconciliations to
consolidated amounts. As stated in the 2006 Form 10-K, the Company evaluates segment performance
based on income before discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effects of
changes in accounting (where applicable). When these items are not applicable, the Company
evaluates performance based on net income. There have been no changes in the basis of segmentation
nor in the basis of measuring segment profit or loss from those used in the Companys 2006 Form
10-K. There have been no material changes in the amount of assets for any operating segment from
the amounts disclosed in the 2006 Form 10-K.
-18-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, 2007 (Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline |
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
And |
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
Total |
|
|
Utility |
|
Storage |
|
Production |
|
Marketing |
|
Timber |
|
Segments |
|
All Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from External
Customers |
|
$ |
210,604 |
|
|
$ |
30,128 |
|
|
$ |
94,394 |
|
|
$ |
113,380 |
|
|
$ |
13,131 |
|
|
$ |
461,637 |
|
|
$ |
1,308 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
463,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment Revenues |
|
$ |
2,586 |
|
|
$ |
20,332 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
22,918 |
|
|
$ |
2,253 |
|
|
$ |
(25,171 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
3,705 |
|
|
$ |
15,451 |
|
|
$ |
24,435 |
|
|
$ |
1,233 |
|
|
$ |
(364 |
) |
|
$ |
44,460 |
|
|
$ |
458 |
|
|
$ |
1,880 |
|
|
$ |
46,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2007 (Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline |
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
and |
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
Total |
|
|
Utility |
|
Storage |
|
Production |
|
Marketing |
|
Timber |
|
Segments |
|
All Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from External
Customers |
|
$ |
1,000,860 |
|
|
$ |
94,889 |
|
|
$ |
275,712 |
|
|
$ |
360,036 |
|
|
$ |
43,079 |
|
|
$ |
1,774,576 |
|
|
$ |
4,387 |
|
|
$ |
578 |
|
|
$ |
1,779,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment Revenues |
|
$ |
12,556 |
|
|
$ |
61,585 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
74,141 |
|
|
$ |
6,540 |
|
|
$ |
(80,681 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
54,322 |
|
|
$ |
43,075 |
|
|
$ |
64,958 |
|
|
$ |
8,431 |
|
|
$ |
3,053 |
|
|
$ |
173,839 |
|
|
$ |
1,911 |
|
|
$ |
4,015 |
|
|
$ |
179,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, 2006 (Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline |
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
and |
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
Total |
|
|
Utility |
|
Storage |
|
Production |
|
Marketing |
|
Timber |
|
Segments |
|
All Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from External
Customers |
|
$ |
186,661 |
|
|
$ |
30,750 |
|
|
$ |
86,600 |
|
|
$ |
94,747 |
|
|
$ |
15,311 |
|
|
$ |
414,069 |
|
|
$ |
1,192 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
415,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment Revenues |
|
$ |
2,514 |
|
|
$ |
20,298 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
22,816 |
|
|
$ |
1,354 |
|
|
$ |
(24,170 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
12,642 |
|
|
$ |
(15,127 |
) |
|
$ |
1,045 |
|
|
$ |
1,529 |
|
|
$ |
916 |
|
|
$ |
(212 |
) |
|
$ |
(593 |
) |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2006 (Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline |
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
and |
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
Total |
|
|
Utility |
|
Storage |
|
Production |
|
Marketing |
|
Timber |
|
Segments |
|
All Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from External
Customers |
|
$ |
1,154,375 |
|
|
$ |
104,835 |
|
|
$ |
257,406 |
|
|
$ |
446,367 |
|
|
$ |
51,377 |
|
|
$ |
2,014,360 |
|
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
$ |
579 |
|
|
$ |
2,017,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment Revenues |
|
$ |
12,317 |
|
|
$ |
61,304 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
73,625 |
|
|
$ |
7,938 |
|
|
$ |
(81,563 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
51,234 |
|
|
$ |
45,384 |
|
|
$ |
28,152 |
|
|
$ |
5,909 |
|
|
$ |
5,235 |
|
|
$ |
135,914 |
|
|
$ |
404 |
|
|
$ |
(195 |
) |
|
$ |
136,123 |
|
-19-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
Note 6 Intangible Assets
The components of the Companys intangible assets were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
At June 30, 2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
Net |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Carrying |
|
Carrying |
|
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Transportation Contracts |
|
$ |
8,580 |
|
|
$ |
(4,722 |
) |
|
$ |
3,858 |
|
|
$ |
4,660 |
|
Long-Term Gas Purchase Contracts |
|
|
31,864 |
|
|
|
(6,221 |
) |
|
|
25,643 |
|
|
|
26,838 |
|
Intangible Assets Not Subject to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plan Intangible Asset |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,700 |
|
|
$ |
(10,943 |
) |
|
$ |
29,757 |
|
|
$ |
31,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Amortization Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
1,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross carrying amount of intangible assets subject to amortization at June 30, 2007
remained unchanged from September 30, 2006. The only activity with regard to intangible assets
subject to amortization was amortization expense as shown in the table above. Amortization expense
for the long-term transportation contracts is estimated to be $0.3 million for the remainder of
2007 and $1.1 million and $0.5 million for 2008 and 2009, respectively. Amortization expense for
transportation contracts is estimated to be $0.4 million annually for 2010 and 2011. Amortization
expense for the long-term gas purchase contracts is estimated to be $0.4 million for the remainder
of 2007 and $1.6 million annually for 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011.
Note 7 Retirement Plan and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plan |
|
Other Post-Retirement Benefits |
Three months ended June 30, |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Service Cost |
|
$ |
3,225 |
|
|
$ |
4,104 |
|
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
|
$ |
2,007 |
|
Interest Cost |
|
|
11,087 |
|
|
|
10,049 |
|
|
|
6,800 |
|
|
|
6,701 |
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets |
|
|
(12,809 |
) |
|
|
(12,486 |
) |
|
|
(6,740 |
) |
|
|
(5,576 |
) |
Amortization of Prior Service Cost |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Amortization of Transition Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
Amortization of Losses |
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
5,777 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
5,850 |
|
Net Amortization and Deferral
For Regulatory Purposes (Including
Volumetric Adjustments) (1) |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
(2,232 |
) |
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
(3,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit Cost |
|
$ |
4,761 |
|
|
$ |
5,451 |
|
|
$ |
8,681 |
|
|
$ |
7,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-20-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plan |
|
Other Post-Retirement Benefits |
Nine months ended June 30, |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Service Cost |
|
$ |
9,674 |
|
|
$ |
12,312 |
|
|
$ |
4,210 |
|
|
$ |
6,022 |
|
Interest Cost |
|
|
33,263 |
|
|
|
30,147 |
|
|
|
20,399 |
|
|
|
20,103 |
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets |
|
|
(38,427 |
) |
|
|
(37,457 |
) |
|
|
(20,220 |
) |
|
|
(16,727 |
) |
Amortization of Prior Service Cost |
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Amortization of Transition Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,345 |
|
|
|
5,345 |
|
Amortization of Losses |
|
|
10,146 |
|
|
|
17,331 |
|
|
|
6,160 |
|
|
|
17,552 |
|
Net Amortization and Deferral
For Regulatory Purposes (Including
Volumetric Adjustments) (1) |
|
|
3,885 |
|
|
|
(1,853 |
) |
|
|
16,453 |
|
|
|
(3,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit Cost |
|
$ |
19,202 |
|
|
$ |
21,198 |
|
|
$ |
32,350 |
|
|
$ |
28,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys policy is to record retirement plan and other post-retirement
benefit costs in the Utility segment on a volumetric basis to reflect the fact that the
Utility segment experiences higher throughput of natural gas in the winter months and lower
throughput of natural gas in the summer months. |
Employer Contributions. During the nine months ended June 30, 2007, the Company contributed
$16.5 million to its retirement plan and $37.0 million to its other post-retirement benefit plan.
In the remainder of 2007, the Company expects to contribute $8.4 million to its retirement plan and
$5.2 million to its other post-retirement benefit plan.
-21-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
OVERVIEW
The Company is a diversified energy company consisting of five reportable business segments.
For the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the quarter and nine months ended
June 30, 2006, the Company has experienced an overall increase in earnings ($46.7 million and $43.6
million, respectively) primarily due to the non-recurrence of an impairment charge of $39.5 million
after-tax related to the Exploration and Production segments Canadian oil and gas assets during
the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The Companys earnings are discussed further in the Results of
Operations section that follows.
From a capital resources and liquidity perspective, the Company spent $206.5 million on
capital expenditures during the nine months ended June 30, 2007, with approximately 67% being spent
in the Exploration and Production segment. This is in line with the Companys expectations.
The Company took a significant step forward this quarter regarding the Empire Connector
project. In June 2007, Empire signed a firm transportation service agreement with KeySpan Gas East
Corporation, thereby obligating Empire to provide transportation service that will require
construction of the Empire Connector project. Construction is planned to begin in fall 2007 and be
completed by November 1, 2008.* The total cost of the Empire Connector project is estimated at
$177 million, after giving effect to an expected sales tax exemption.* The project is discussed
further in the Capital Resources and Liquidity and Rates and Regulatory Matters sections that
follow.
The Company also began repurchasing outstanding shares of common stock during fiscal 2006
under a share repurchase program authorized by the Companys Board of Directors. The program
authorizes the Company to repurchase up to an aggregate amount of 8 million shares. Through June
30, 2007, the Company had repurchased 3,721,878 shares for $128.5 million under this program,
including 1,195,328 shares for $43.3 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2007. These
matters are discussed further in the Capital Resources and Liquidity section that follows.
On January 29, 2007, the Company commenced a rate case in the New York rate jurisdiction of
the Utility segment by filing proposed tariff amendments and supporting testimony requesting
approval to increase its annual revenues by $52.0 million annually. The Company explained in the
filing that its request for rate relief is necessitated by decreased revenues resulting from
customer conservation efforts and increased customer uncollectibles, among other things. The rate
filing also includes a proposal for an aggressive efficiency and conservation initiative with a
revenue decoupling mechanism designed to render the Company indifferent to throughput reductions
resulting from conservation. This matter is discussed more fully in the Rate and Regulatory
Matters section that follows.
Lastly, the Company recently received bids for the sale of SECI, Senecas wholly owned
subsidiary that operates in Canada, and is currently negotiating with
the highest bidder. The Company expects that it may complete a sale
by September 30, 2007.*
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
For a complete discussion of critical accounting estimates, refer to Critical Accounting
Estimates in Item 7 of the 2006 Form 10-K. There have been no subsequent changes to that
disclosure.
-22-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings
The Companys earnings were $46.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 compared to
earnings of $0.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The increase in earnings of $46.7
million is primarily the result of higher earnings in the Exploration and Production, Utility, and
Pipeline and Storage segments and the Corporate and All Other categories, slightly offset by lower
earnings in the Timber segment, as shown in the table below. Earnings for the quarter ended June
30, 2006 include a $62.4 million impairment charge before tax ($39.5 million after-tax) for the
Exploration and Production segments Canadian oil and gas producing properties under the full cost
method of accounting using natural gas pricing at June 30, 2006. No such impairment was recognized
in the quarter ended June 30, 2007. The Exploration and Production segment also recognized a $6.1
million benefit to earnings related to income taxes recognized during the quarter ended June 30,
2006. In the Pipeline and Storage segment, a $4.8 million benefit to earnings was recognized for
the quarter ended June 30, 2007 due to the reversal of a reserve established for all costs incurred
related to the Empire Connector project.
The Companys earnings were $179.8 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 compared to
earnings of $136.1 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2006. The increase in earnings is
primarily the result of higher earnings in the Exploration and Production, Utility, and Energy
Marketing segments and the Corporate and All Other categories, offset slightly by lower earnings in
the Pipeline and Storage and Timber segments, as shown in the table below. Earnings for the nine
months ended June 30, 2007 include a $4.8 million benefit to earnings related to the reversal of a
reserve established for all costs incurred related to the Empire Connector project. Earnings for
the nine months ended June 30, 2006 include a $62.4 million impairment charge before tax ($39.5
million after-tax) for the Companys Canadian oil and gas producing properties in the Exploration
and Production segment that did not recur, as noted above, and a $11.2 million benefit to earnings
related to income taxes, also in the Exploration and Production segment.
Additional discussion of earnings in each of the business segments can be found in the
business segment information that follows. Note that all amounts used in the earnings discussions
are after tax amounts, unless otherwise noted.
Earnings (Loss) by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
(Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Utility |
|
$ |
3,705 |
|
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
2,878 |
|
|
$ |
54,322 |
|
|
$ |
51,234 |
|
|
$ |
3,088 |
|
Pipeline and Storage |
|
|
15,451 |
|
|
|
12,642 |
|
|
|
2,809 |
|
|
|
43,075 |
|
|
|
45,384 |
|
|
|
(2,309 |
) |
Exploration and Production |
|
|
24,435 |
|
|
|
(15,127 |
) |
|
|
39,562 |
|
|
|
64,958 |
|
|
|
28,152 |
|
|
|
36,806 |
|
Energy Marketing |
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
8,431 |
|
|
|
5,909 |
|
|
|
2,522 |
|
Timber |
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
(1,893 |
) |
|
|
3,053 |
|
|
|
5,235 |
|
|
|
(2,182 |
) |
|
Total Reportable Segments |
|
|
44,460 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
43,544 |
|
|
|
173,839 |
|
|
|
135,914 |
|
|
|
37,925 |
|
All Other |
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
1,911 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
Corporate (1) |
|
|
1,880 |
|
|
|
(593 |
) |
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
Total Consolidated |
|
$ |
46,798 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
46,687 |
|
|
$ |
179,765 |
|
|
$ |
136,123 |
|
|
$ |
43,642 |
|
|
(1) Includes earnings from the former International segments activity.
-23-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Cont.)
Utility
Utility Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
(Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Retail Sales Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
$ |
158,922 |
|
|
$ |
144,690 |
|
|
$ |
14,232 |
|
|
$ |
778,572 |
|
|
$ |
912,058 |
|
|
$ |
(133,486 |
) |
Commercial |
|
|
24,380 |
|
|
|
22,362 |
|
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
127,485 |
|
|
|
155,010 |
|
|
|
(27,525 |
) |
Industrial |
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
7,081 |
|
|
|
12,372 |
|
|
|
(5,291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
184,734 |
|
|
|
168,700 |
|
|
|
16,034 |
|
|
|
913,138 |
|
|
|
1,079,440 |
|
|
|
(166,302 |
) |
|
Transportation |
|
|
21,017 |
|
|
|
16,930 |
|
|
|
4,087 |
|
|
|
86,358 |
|
|
|
76,205 |
|
|
|
10,153 |
|
Off-System Sales |
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,712 |
|
|
|
3,545 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
10,193 |
|
|
|
11,047 |
|
|
|
(854 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
213,190 |
|
|
$ |
189,175 |
|
|
$ |
24,015 |
|
|
$ |
1,013,416 |
|
|
$ |
1,166,692 |
|
|
$ |
(153,276 |
) |
|
Utility Throughput
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
(MMcf) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Retail Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
10,679 |
|
|
|
8,740 |
|
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
56,729 |
|
|
|
55,071 |
|
|
|
1,658 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
1,836 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
10,132 |
|
|
|
9,940 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
12,628 |
|
|
|
10,313 |
|
|
|
2,315 |
|
|
|
67,489 |
|
|
|
65,911 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
Transportation |
|
|
12,981 |
|
|
|
12,185 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
53,556 |
|
|
|
48,646 |
|
|
|
4,910 |
|
Off-System Sales |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
|
|
26,076 |
|
|
|
22,498 |
|
|
|
3,578 |
|
|
|
121,512 |
|
|
|
114,557 |
|
|
|
6,955 |
|
|
Degree Days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent Colder |
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Warmer) Than |
June 30 |
|
Normal |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Normal |
|
Prior Year |
|
Buffalo |
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
26.0 |
|
Erie |
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
Nine Months
Ended
June 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buffalo |
|
|
6,514 |
|
|
|
6,195 |
|
|
|
5,816 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
6.5 |
|
Erie |
|
|
6,108 |
|
|
|
5,930 |
|
|
|
5,565 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues for the Utility segment increased $24.0 million for the quarter ended June
30, 2007 as compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The increase for the quarter is
primarily attributable to higher retail gas sales revenue, higher transportation revenue and higher
off-system sales revenue. The $16.0 million increase in retail gas sales revenues was a function
of higher throughput volumes that reflect an increase in normalized usage per account, as well as
the $2.8 million impact of a
base rate increase in the Pennsylvania jurisdiction, which became effective January 2007. The
$4.1 million increase in transportation revenues is primarily attributable to the migration of
retail customers to transportation service.
-24-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Cont.)
Operating revenues for the Utility segment decreased $153.3 million for the nine months ended
June 30, 2007 as compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2006. The decrease is primarily
attributable to lower retail gas sales revenues. The decrease in retail gas sales revenues of
$166.3 million was largely a function of the recovery of lower gas costs, which more than offset
the revenue effect of higher retail sales volumes, as shown in the table above. Slightly
offsetting the decrease, in the Pennsylvania jurisdiction, the impact of a base rate increase,
which became effective in January 2007, increased operating revenues for the nine-month period by
$7.5 million. The increase in transportation revenues was primarily due a 4.9 Bcf increase in
transportation throughput, largely due to the migration of retail sales customers to transportation
service. The corresponding $10.2 million increase in transportation revenues would have been
greater if not for a $3.9 million out-of-period adjustment recorded in the first quarter of fiscal
2006 to correct Distribution Corporations calculation of the symmetrical sharing component of New
Yorks gas adjustment rate.
The Utility segments earnings for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 were $3.7 million, an
increase of $2.9 million compared to earnings of $0.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
In the Pennsylvania jurisdiction, earnings increased by $2.0 million due primarily to the impact of
a base rate increase ($1.8 million), and increased usage per account ($0.6 million), discussed
above. These increases were partly offset by higher interest expense ($0.3 million) and higher
operating costs ($0.2 million). In the New York jurisdiction, earnings increased $0.9 million due
primarily to an increase in usage per account ($2.3 million). Higher operating costs ($0.4
million), the negative impact of a higher effective tax rate ($0.6 million), and higher interest
expense ($0.3 million) partially offset this increase.
The impact of weather variations on earnings in the New York jurisdiction is mitigated by that
jurisdictions WNC. The WNC in New York, which covers the eight-month period from October through
May, has had a stabilizing effect on earnings for the New York jurisdiction. For the quarter ended
June 30, 2007, the WNC did not have a significant impact on earnings as the weather was close to
normal. For the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the WNC preserved earnings of approximately $1.5
million, as the weather was warmer than normal.
The Utility segments earnings for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 were $54.3 million, an
increase of $3.1 million when compared with earnings of $51.2 million for the nine months ended
June 30, 2006. In the Pennsylvania jurisdiction, earnings increased $7.8 million due primarily to
a base rate increase ($4.9 million) that became effective in January 2007, as discussed above,
colder weather ($2.3 million), the positive impact associated with a lower effective tax rate ($1.5
million), and the positive impact associated with higher usage per account ($0.6 million). Higher
intercompany and other interest expense of $0.9 million partly offset these increases. In the New
York jurisdiction, earnings decreased $4.7 million due primarily to the out-of-period symmetrical
sharing adjustment discussed above ($2.6 million), higher bad debt and other operating costs ($3.1
million), higher property taxes ($0.7 million), and higher interest expense ($0.4 million).
Increased usage per account ($1.9 million) partly offset these decreases.
For the nine months ended June 30, 2007, the WNC preserved earnings of approximately $2.3
million, as the weather was warmer than normal. For the nine months ended June 30, 2006, the WNC
preserved earnings of approximately $6.2 million, as the weather was warmer than normal.
-25-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Cont.)
Pipeline and Storage
Pipeline and Storage Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
(Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Firm Transportation |
|
$ |
28,556 |
|
|
$ |
27,756 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
$ |
89,819 |
|
|
$ |
90,579 |
|
|
$ |
(760 |
) |
Interruptible Transportation |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
3,571 |
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
29,726 |
|
|
|
28,888 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
92,890 |
|
|
|
94,150 |
|
|
|
(1,260 |
) |
|
Firm Storage Service |
|
|
17,002 |
|
|
|
17,149 |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
50,194 |
|
|
|
49,804 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,732 |
|
|
|
5,011 |
|
|
|
(1,279 |
) |
|
|
13,390 |
|
|
|
22,185 |
|
|
|
(8,795 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
50,460 |
|
|
$ |
51,048 |
|
|
$ |
(588 |
) |
|
$ |
156,474 |
|
|
$ |
166,139 |
|
|
$ |
(9,665 |
) |
|
Pipeline and Storage Throughput
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(MMcf) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Decrease |
|
Firm Transportation |
|
|
78,455 |
|
|
|
70,620 |
|
|
|
7,835 |
|
|
|
273,513 |
|
|
|
288,270 |
|
|
|
(14,757 |
) |
Interruptible Transportation |
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
2,220 |
|
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
3,597 |
|
|
|
7,774 |
|
|
|
(4,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
80,125 |
|
|
|
72,840 |
|
|
|
7,285 |
|
|
|
277,110 |
|
|
|
296,044 |
|
|
|
(18,934 |
) |
|
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues for the Pipeline and Storage segment decreased $0.6 million for the quarter
ended June 30, 2007 as compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The decrease was primarily
due to decreased efficiency gas revenues ($1.8 million), reported as part of other revenues in the
table above. This decrease was due primarily to the Companys recent settlement with the FERC,
which decreased the efficiency gas retainage allowances. The decrease was partially offset by a
$0.8 million increase in transportation revenue primarily caused by an increase in firm storage
transportation contracts at the maximum rate.
Operating revenues for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 decreased $9.7 million as compared
with the nine months ended June 30, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to decreased efficiency
gas revenues ($10.7 million), reported as part of other revenues in the table above. This decrease
was due primarily to the Companys recent settlement with the FERC, which decreased the efficiency
gas retainage allowances, coupled with lower gas prices during the nine months ended June 30, 2007
as compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2006. In addition, there was a $0.9 million decrease
to transportation/storage revenue caused by the Utility segments reduction in their firm contract
volumes in fiscal 2007, coupled with the impact on revenues associated with non-recurring market
conditions that arose from the effect of hurricane damage to production and pipeline infrastructure
in the Gulf of Mexico during the fall of 2005. Offsetting these decreases, there was a $1.4
million increase to other revenues attributable to the lease termination fee adjustment in 2006 (an
intercompany transaction) for the Companys former headquarters, which did not recur in 2007.
The Pipeline and Storage segments earnings for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 were $15.5
million, an increase of $2.9 million when compared to the earnings of $12.6 million for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006. The increase in earnings primarily reflects the reversal of a reserve for
preliminary survey costs ($4.8 million) related to the Empire Connector project. Based on the
signing of a service agreement with KeySpan Gas East Corporation during the quarter ended June 30,
2007, management determined that it was probable that the project would go forward and that such
preliminary survey costs were properly capitalizable in accordance with the FERCs Uniform System
of Accounts. Additionally, there was a $0.8 million reduction in depreciation expense as a
result of the most recent settlement with the FERC, which
-26-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
reduced depreciation rates. These positive earnings impacts were partially offset by a $1.2
million decrease in efficiency gas revenues, and a $0.8 million increase in operating costs
(primarily post-retirement benefit costs). The decrease in efficiency gas revenues and the
increase in post-retirement benefit costs are due to the recent FERC settlement. In addition,
there was a $1.0 million increase in interest expense causing a reduction in earnings.
The Pipeline and Storage segments earnings for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 were $43.1
million, a decrease of $2.3 million when compared to the earnings of $45.4 million for the nine
months ended June 30, 2006. The main factors contributing to this decrease were lower efficiency
gas revenues ($7.0 million), higher interest expense ($2.4 million) and higher operating costs
(primarily post-retirement benefit costs) of $1.0 million. These were partially offset by the
favorable earnings impact associated with the reversal of the reserve for preliminary survey costs
discussed above ($4.8 million). In addition, there was a $1.8 million reduction in depreciation
expense as a result of the most recent settlement with the FERC, which reduced depreciation rates.
There was also a $1.9 million positive earnings impact associated with the discontinuance of hedge
accounting for Empires interest rate collar. On December 8, 2006, Empire repaid $22.8 million of
secured debt. The interest costs of this secured debt were hedged by the interest rate collar.
Since the hedged transaction was settled and there will be no future cash flows associated with the
secured debt, the unrealized gain in accumulated other comprehensive income associated with the
interest rate collar was reclassified to the income statement.
Exploration and Production
Exploration and Production Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
(Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Gas (after Hedging) |
|
$ |
45,761 |
|
|
$ |
42,786 |
|
|
$ |
2,975 |
|
|
$ |
140,931 |
|
|
$ |
141,560 |
|
|
$ |
(629 |
) |
Oil (after Hedging) |
|
|
45,583 |
|
|
|
41,282 |
|
|
|
4,301 |
|
|
|
125,507 |
|
|
|
106,938 |
|
|
|
18,569 |
|
Gas Processing Plant |
|
|
10,466 |
|
|
|
8,904 |
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
28,212 |
|
|
|
32,986 |
|
|
|
(4,774 |
) |
Other |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
(638 |
) |
Intrasegment Elimination (1) |
|
|
(7,436 |
) |
|
|
(5,966 |
) |
|
|
(1,470 |
) |
|
|
(19,729 |
) |
|
|
(25,507 |
) |
|
|
5,778 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
94,394 |
|
|
$ |
86,600 |
|
|
$ |
7,794 |
|
|
$ |
275,712 |
|
|
$ |
257,406 |
|
|
$ |
18,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the elimination of certain West Coast gas production revenue included
in Gas (after Hedging) in the table above that was sold to the gas processing plant shown in
the table above. An elimination for the same dollar amount was made to reduce the gas
processing plants Purchased Gas expense. |
Production Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Gas Production (MMcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
|
2,317 |
|
|
|
2,109 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
7,934 |
|
|
|
6,529 |
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
West Coast |
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
Appalachia |
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
1,267 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
3,998 |
|
|
|
3,766 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
Canada |
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
2,158 |
|
|
|
(519 |
) |
|
|
5,216 |
|
|
|
5,830 |
|
|
|
(614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
6,241 |
|
|
|
6,517 |
|
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
20,031 |
|
|
|
19,058 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Production
(Mbbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
West Coast |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
1,962 |
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
Appalachia |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Canada |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
|
2,703 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
-27-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Average Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Average Gas Price/Mcf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
$ |
7.37 |
|
|
$ |
6.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
6.74 |
|
|
$ |
8.56 |
|
|
$ |
(1.82 |
) |
West Coast |
|
$ |
7.20 |
|
|
$ |
6.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
6.76 |
|
|
$ |
8.42 |
|
|
$ |
(1.66 |
) |
Appalachia |
|
$ |
8.59 |
|
|
$ |
7.26 |
|
|
$ |
1.33 |
|
|
$ |
7.71 |
|
|
$ |
10.29 |
|
|
$ |
(2.58 |
) |
Canada |
|
$ |
6.82 |
|
|
$ |
5.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
6.34 |
|
|
$ |
7.75 |
|
|
$ |
(1.41 |
) |
Weighted Average |
|
$ |
7.45 |
|
|
$ |
6.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
6.83 |
|
|
$ |
8.64 |
|
|
$ |
(1.81 |
) |
Weighted Average After
Hedging |
|
$ |
7.33 |
|
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
7.04 |
|
|
$ |
7.43 |
|
|
$ |
(0.39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Oil Price/bbl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
$ |
65.17 |
|
|
$ |
67.52 |
|
|
$ |
(2.35 |
) |
|
$ |
59.37 |
|
|
$ |
62.04 |
|
|
$ |
(2.67 |
) |
West Coast |
|
$ |
57.77 |
|
|
$ |
61.51 |
|
|
$ |
(3.74 |
) |
|
$ |
52.96 |
|
|
$ |
55.40 |
|
|
$ |
(2.44 |
) |
Appalachia |
|
$ |
60.43 |
|
|
$ |
63.15 |
|
|
$ |
(2.72 |
) |
|
$ |
59.35 |
|
|
$ |
61.92 |
|
|
$ |
(2.57 |
) |
Canada |
|
$ |
51.58 |
|
|
$ |
57.88 |
|
|
$ |
(6.30 |
) |
|
$ |
48.16 |
|
|
$ |
49.25 |
|
|
$ |
(1.09 |
) |
Weighted Average |
|
$ |
58.87 |
|
|
$ |
62.54 |
|
|
$ |
(3.67 |
) |
|
$ |
54.20 |
|
|
$ |
56.17 |
|
|
$ |
(1.97 |
) |
Weighted Average After
Hedging |
|
$ |
53.40 |
|
|
$ |
45.13 |
|
|
$ |
8.27 |
|
|
$ |
48.37 |
|
|
$ |
39.56 |
|
|
$ |
8.81 |
|
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues for the Exploration and Production segment increased $7.8 million for the
quarter ended June 30, 2007 as compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2006. Oil production
revenue after hedging increased $4.3 million due to a $8.27 per barrel increase in weighted average
prices after hedging. Gas production revenue after hedging increased $3.0 million. An increase in
the weighted average price of gas after hedging ($0.76 per Mcf) more than offset a decrease in gas
production of 276 MMcf. The decrease in gas production occurred mainly in this segments Canadian
region (519 MMcf), as shown in the table above, and is primarily attributable to the shutting-in of
the Sukunka properties for one month of the quarter ended June 30, 2007, due to a work-over of the
processing plant used for this production. While oil prices actually decreased quarter over
quarter, many of the lower priced hedges during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 had expired and
were not replaced, resulting in an increase to the weighted average oil price (after hedging)
received for this segments oil production during the quarter ended June 30, 2007.
Operating revenues for the Exploration and Production segment increased $18.3 million for the
nine months ended June 30, 2007 as compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2006. Oil
production revenue after hedging increased $18.6 million due to an $8.81 per barrel increase in
weighted average prices after hedging. Gas production revenue after hedging decreased $0.6
million. A decrease in the weighted average price of gas after hedging ($0.39 per Mcf) more than
offset an increase in gas production of 973 MMcf. The increase in gas production occurred
primarily in the Gulf Coast region (1,405 MMcf). During the quarter ended December 31, 2005, Seneca
experienced significant production delays due largely to the impact of hurricane damage to pipeline
infrastructure in the Gulf of Mexico. Seneca had substantially all of its pre-hurricane Gulf of
Mexico production back on line at the beginning of fiscal 2007. This increase in production was
partially offset by lower gas production in the Canadian region, as discussed above.
The Exploration and Production segments earnings for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 were
$24.4 million, an increase of $39.5 million when compared with a loss of $15.1 million for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006. The increase is primarily attributable to an impairment charge of
$39.5 million on this segments Canadian oil and gas producing properties, recognized during the
quarter ended June 30, 2006. Higher crude oil and natural gas prices increased earnings by $4.6
million and $3.1 million, respectively, and lower depletion expense increased earnings by
$2.7 million. Earnings were also
-28-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
positively impacted by a lower effective tax rate ($1.6 million). Earnings were negatively
impacted by the non-recurrence of $6.1 million of tax benefits recognized during the quarter ended
June 30, 2006 and higher lease operating expense of $2.6 million. Lower crude oil and natural gas
production also decreased earnings by $1.8 million and $1.2 million, respectively. The $6.1
million of tax benefits recognized during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 is discussed below under
Income Tax Expense (Benefit).
The Exploration and Production segments earnings for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 were
$65.0 million, an increase of $36.8 million when compared with earnings of $28.2 million for the
nine months ended June 30, 2006. The increase is primarily attributable to the impairment charge
of $39.5 million recognized during the quarter ended June 30, 2006, discussed above. Higher crude
oil prices and higher natural gas production also increased earnings by $14.9 million and $4.7
million, respectively, and lower depletion expense increased earnings by $2.5 million. These
increases were partly offset by the non-recurrence of $6.1 million and $5.1 million of tax benefits
recognized during the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006, respectively, as well as by
higher lease operating expense of $3.5 million. Lower natural gas prices and lower crude oil
production also decreased earnings by $5.1 million and $2.8 million, respectively. Earnings were
also negatively impacted by a higher effective tax rate ($2.5 million), largely due to higher New
York State taxes. The Company files a combined New York State tax return and allocates such state
tax among all subsidiaries. The $6.1 million and $5.1 million of tax benefits recognized during
the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006, respectively, are discussed below under
Income Tax Expense (Benefit).
Energy Marketing
Energy Marketing Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
(Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Natural Gas (after Hedging) |
|
$ |
113,351 |
|
|
$ |
94,516 |
|
|
$ |
18,835 |
|
|
$ |
359,895 |
|
|
$ |
446,095 |
|
|
$ |
(86,200 |
) |
Other |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
113,380 |
|
|
$ |
94,747 |
|
|
$ |
18,633 |
|
|
$ |
360,036 |
|
|
$ |
446,367 |
|
|
$ |
(86,331 |
) |
|
Energy Marketing Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Increase |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Increase |
|
Natural Gas (MMcf) |
|
|
13,014 |
|
|
|
11,190 |
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
44,063 |
|
|
|
38,496 |
|
|
|
5,567 |
|
|
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues for the Energy Marketing segment increased $18.6 million for the quarter
ended June 30, 2007 as compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The increase is primarily
due to higher gas sales revenue due to an increase in throughput and, to a lesser extent, an
increase in the price of natural gas. The increase in throughput is attributable to the addition
of certain large, low-margin
commercial and industrial customers, an increase in sales to existing wholesale customers, and
colder weather.
For the nine months ended June 30, 2007, operating revenues for the Energy Marketing segment
decreased $86.3 million as compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2006. The decrease
primarily reflects lower gas sales revenue due to a decrease in natural gas commodity prices
for the period that
-29-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
were recovered through revenues, offset in part by an increase in throughput. The increase in
throughput was due to the addition of certain large, low-margin commercial and industrial
customers, an increase in sales to existing wholesale customers, and colder weather.
Earnings in the Energy Marketing segment increased $0.2 million and $2.5 million,
respectively, for the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2007 as compared with the quarter and
nine months ended June 30, 2006. For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, despite higher operating
revenues and volumes, margins did not change significantly due to lower average margins per Mcf.
For the nine months ended June 30, 2007, higher margins of $2.6 million are responsible for the
increase in earnings. The increase in margin is mainly the result of a $2.3 million reversal of an
accrual for purchased gas expense related to the resolution of a contingency during the quarter
ended March 31, 2007. The increase in throughput noted above, as well as greater financial
benefits recognized from increased storage capacity utilization and price differentials also
contributed to the increase in margin.
Timber
Timber Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
(Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Log Sales |
|
$ |
3,504 |
|
|
$ |
4,063 |
|
|
$ |
(559 |
) |
|
$ |
16,950 |
|
|
$ |
18,586 |
|
|
$ |
(1,636 |
) |
Green Lumber Sales |
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
2,097 |
|
|
|
(779 |
) |
|
|
3,582 |
|
|
|
5,527 |
|
|
|
(1,945 |
) |
Kiln-dried Lumber Sales |
|
|
7,247 |
|
|
|
8,733 |
|
|
|
(1,486 |
) |
|
|
20,742 |
|
|
|
25,618 |
|
|
|
(4,876 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
$ |
13,131 |
|
|
$ |
15,315 |
|
|
$ |
(2,184 |
) |
|
$ |
43,079 |
|
|
$ |
51,381 |
|
|
$ |
(8,302 |
) |
|
Timber Board Feet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Decrease |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Decrease |
|
Log Sales |
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
6,458 |
|
|
|
7,540 |
|
|
|
(1,082 |
) |
Green Lumber Sales |
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
3,126 |
|
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
6,619 |
|
|
|
8,082 |
|
|
|
(1,463 |
) |
Kiln-dried Lumber Sales |
|
|
4,001 |
|
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
10,953 |
|
|
|
13,239 |
|
|
|
(2,286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
8,434 |
|
|
|
9,133 |
|
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
24,030 |
|
|
|
28,861 |
|
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
|
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues for the Timber segment decreased $2.2 million for the quarter ended June
30, 2007 as compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The decrease for the quarter can
largely be attributed to lower kiln-dried lumber sales of $1.5 million primarily due to a decrease in
the market price of kiln-dried cherry lumber. Also contributing to the decrease was a decline in
both log and green lumber sales revenue of $0.6 million and $0.8 million, respectively. The
decrease in log sales revenue is due to a decline in cherry veneer log volumes of 101,000 board
feet, which command the highest price in the
overall mix of harvested timber and have the largest impact on overall log sales revenue. Log
volumes were down as a result of poor weather conditions in April 2007 that limited harvesting.
The decline in green lumber sales revenue reflects a decline in processing volumes of 417,000 board
feet, particularly from hard and soft maple green lumber, due to the limited availability of logs
being harvested, as well as a decline in the market price of green lumber. With the addition of
two new kilns placed into service in June 2007 that allow for greater processing capacity, the
Company plans to reduce green lumber sales and increase kiln-dried lumber sales as kiln-dried lumber
commands a much higher price than green lumber.*
-30-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Operating revenues for the Timber segment decreased $8.3 million for the nine months ended
June 30, 2007 as compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2006. This decrease can be
attributed to unfavorable weather conditions primarily during the fall of 2006 and the spring of
2007 that greatly diminished the harvesting of logs. These conditions consisted of warm, wet
weather that made it difficult to bring logging trucks into the forests. Weather conditions were
significantly more favorable throughout the nine months ended June 30, 2006. These unfavorable
conditions for harvesting resulted in a decline in log sales of $1.6 million or 1.1 million board
feet. There was also a decline in both green lumber and kiln-dried lumber sales of $1.9 million and
$4.9 million, respectively, since there were fewer logs available for processing. Additionally,
the processing of a greater amount of lumber species other than cherry has contributed to the
decrease in kiln-dried lumber sales. These lumber species are sold at a lower price than kiln-dried
cherry lumber.
The Timber segment recorded a loss of $0.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, a
decrease of $1.9 million when compared with earnings of $1.5 million for the quarter ended June 30,
2006. The decrease is largely attributable to lower margins from lumber and log sales ($2.0
million) as a result of the decline in revenues noted above. Partially offsetting this decrease
was a decline in depletion expense of $0.3 million. The decrease in depletion expense reflects the
cutting of more low cost or no cost basis timber from Company owned land as well as the overall
decrease in logs harvested.
The Timber segments earnings for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 were $3.1 million, a
decrease of $2.1 million when compared with earnings of $5.2 million for the nine months ended June
30, 2006. The decrease was primarily due to lower margins from lumber and log sales ($3.1 million)
as a result of the decline in revenues noted above. Partially offsetting this decrease was a
decline in depletion expense of $1.2 million. The decrease in depletion expense reflects the
cutting of more low cost or no cost basis timber from Company owned land as well as the overall
decrease in logs harvested.
Corporate and All Other
2007 Compared with 2006
Corporate and All Other recorded earnings of $2.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
compared with a loss of $0.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. This increase was
partially due to an increase in interest income of $0.8 million (primarily intercompany interest).
On a consolidated basis, all significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated.
Also contributing to the increase in earnings was lower interest expense on long-term debt of $0.6
million, higher income from unconsolidated subsidiaries of $0.5 million in the All Other category,
lower operating costs of $0.3 million, the positive impact of a lower effective tax rate ($0.6
million), and higher margins by Horizon LFG ($0.2 million).
For the nine months ended June 30, 2007, Corporate and All Other had earnings of $5.9 million
compared with earnings of $0.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2006. This improvement
was largely due to an increase in interest income of $3.7 million (primarily intercompany
interest). A death benefit gain on life insurance proceeds ($1.9 million) was recognized in the
Corporate category as noted below under Other Income, but was largely offset by an out-of-period
pension expense adjustment associated with the Companys Non-Qualified defined benefit plan of $1.6
million. In the All Other category, Horizon LFGs earnings benefited from higher margins of $0.9
million in the nine months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2006,
and Horizon Powers income from
unconsolidated subsidiaries increased $0.6 million, also contributing to the increase in
earnings. The Corporate and All Other categories also had a positive earnings benefit associated
with a lower effective tax rate ($1.3 million). Partially offsetting these increases, the
Corporate and All Other categories experienced higher interest expense of $0.3 million and higher
operating costs of $0.3 million.
-31-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Other Income
Other income increased $0.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively, for the quarter and nine
months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2006. For the
nine months ended June 30, 2007, the increase can be attributed to a death benefit gain on life
insurance proceeds of $1.9 million recognized in the Corporate category.
Interest Charges
Interest on long-term debt increased $0.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as
compared with the quarter ended June 30, 2006. For the nine months ended June 30, 2007, interest
on long-term debt decreased $2.3 million as compared with the nine months ended June 30, 2006 due
to a $1.9 million benefit to interest expense as a result of the discontinuance of hedge accounting
for Empires interest rate collar, as discussed above under Pipeline and Storage. The underlying
long-term debt associated with this interest rate collar was repaid in December 2006 and the
unrealized gain recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income associated with the interest
rate collar was reclassified to interest expense during the quarter ended December 31, 2006.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
The Companys effective income tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 was approximately
35%, compared to approximately 101% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. For the quarter ended
June 30, 2006, while the Company experienced a loss of $7.7 million, it recognized a tax benefit of
$7.8 million. The significant change in the effective income tax rate was a result of the income
tax benefit of $6.1 million that was recognized in the Exploration and Production segment in the
quarter ended June 30, 2006 that did not recur in 2007. This benefit resulted from the reversal of
a valuation allowance ($2.9 million) associated with the capital loss carryforward that resulted
from the 2003 sale of certain of Senecas oil properties. During the quarter ended June 30, 2006,
the Company made the determination that it expected to be in a position to fully utilize the loss
carryforward and so a valuation allowance was no longer necessary. A tax benefit of $3.2 million
also resulted from the favorable resolution of certain open tax issues.
The Companys effective income tax rate for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 was
approximately 38%, compared to approximately 34% for the nine months ended June 30, 2006. The
change in the effective income tax rate was a result of the $6.1 million income tax benefit
recorded during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 that did not recur in 2007, as discussed above. It
also reflected a $5.1 million income tax benefit recorded during the quarter ended March 31, 2006
that did not recur in 2007. The $5.1 million benefit was an adjustment to a deferred income tax
balance. Under GAAP, a company may recognize the benefit of certain expected future income tax
deductions as a deferred tax asset only if it anticipates sufficient future taxable income to
utilize those deductions. As a result of higher commodity prices, the Company increased its
forecast of future taxable income in the Exploration and Production segments Canadian division
and, as a result, recorded a deferred tax asset during the quarter ended March 31, 2006 for certain
drilling costs that it expected to deduct on future income tax returns.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
The Companys primary source of cash during the nine-month period ended June 30, 2007
consisted of cash provided by operating activities. This source of cash was supplemented by issues
of new shares of common stock as a result of stock option exercises. During the nine months ended
June 30, 2007, the common stock used to fulfill the requirements of the Companys 401(k) plans and
Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan was obtained via open market purchases.
During fiscal 2006, the Company began repurchasing outstanding shares of its common stock under a
share repurchase program, which is discussed below under Financing Cash Flow.
-32-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Operating Cash Flow
Internally generated cash from operating activities consists of net income available for
common stock, adjusted for non-cash expenses, non-cash income and changes in operating assets and
liabilities. Non-cash items include depreciation, depletion and amortization, impairment of oil and
gas producing properties, deferred income taxes, and income or loss from unconsolidated
subsidiaries net of cash distributions.
Cash provided by operating activities in the Utility and the Pipeline and Storage segments may
vary from period to period because of the impact of rate cases. In the Utility segment, supplier
refunds, over- or under-recovered purchased gas costs and weather may also significantly impact
cash flow. The impact of weather on cash flow is tempered in the Utility segments New York rate
jurisdiction by its WNC and in the Pipeline and Storage segment by Supply Corporations straight
fixed-variable rate design.
Because of the seasonal nature of the heating business in the Utility and Energy Marketing
segments, revenues in these segments are relatively high during the heating season, primarily the
first and second quarters of the fiscal year, and receivable balances historically increase during
these periods from the balances receivable at September 30.
The storage gas inventory normally declines during the first and second quarters of the fiscal
year and is replenished during the third and fourth quarters. For storage gas inventory accounted
for under the LIFO method, the current cost of replacing gas withdrawn from storage is recorded in
the Consolidated Statements of Income and a reserve for gas replacement is recorded in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets under the caption Other Accruals and Current Liabilities. Such
reserve is reduced as the inventory is replenished.
Cash provided by operating activities in the Exploration and Production segment may vary from
period to period as a result of changes in the commodity prices of natural gas and crude oil. The
Company uses various derivative financial instruments, including price swap agreements and no cost
collars, options and futures contracts in an attempt to manage this energy commodity price risk.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $404.6 million for the nine months ended
June 30, 2007, a decrease of $5.3 million compared with $409.9 million provided by operating
activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2006. Higher working capital requirements in the
Exploration and Production segment were partially offset by lower working capital requirements in
the Energy Marketing segment.
Investing Cash Flow
Expenditures for Long-Lived Assets
The Companys expenditures for long-lived assets totaled $206.5 million during the nine months
ended June 30, 2007. The table below presents these expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2007 (in millions of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Capital |
|
Investment |
|
Expenditures for |
|
|
Expenditures |
|
in Partnership |
|
Long-Lived Assets |
|
Utility |
|
$ |
39.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
39.9 |
|
Pipeline and Storage |
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
Exploration and Production |
|
|
138.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138.3 |
|
Timber |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Corporate and All Other |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
206.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
209.8 |
|
|
-33-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Utility
The majority of the Utility capital expenditures for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 were
made for replacement of mains and main extensions, as well as for the replacement of service lines.
Pipeline and Storage
The majority of the Pipeline and Storage capital expenditures for the nine months ended June
30, 2007 were made for additions, improvements, and replacements to this segments transmission and
storage systems.
The Company continues to explore various opportunities to expand its capabilities to transport
gas to the East Coast, either through the Supply Corporation or Empire systems or in partnership
with others. In October 2005, Empire filed an application with the FERC for the authority to build
and operate the Empire Connector project to expand its natural gas pipeline operations to serve new
markets in New York and elsewhere in the Northeast by extending the Empire Pipeline. The
application also asked that Empires existing business and facilities be brought under FERC
jurisdiction, and that the FERC approve rates for Empires existing and proposed services. The
Empire Connector will provide an upstream supply link for the Millennium Pipeline, which began
construction in June 2007, and will transport Canadian and other natural gas supplies to downstream
customers.* The Empire Connector will be designed to move up to approximately 250 MDth of natural
gas per day.* The planned in-service date is November 2008.* The FERC issued on December 21, 2006
an order granting a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity authorizing the construction
and operation of the Empire Connector and various other related pipeline projects by other
unaffiliated companies, which has been accepted by Empire and the other applicants. In June 2007,
Empire and KeySpan Gas East Corporation (KeySpan) executed a binding firm transportation service
agreement for 150.75 MDth per day, obligating Empire to provide transportation service that will
require construction of the Empire Connector project. Refer to the Rate and Regulatory Matters
section that follows for further discussion of this matter. The total cost of the Empire Connector
project is estimated at $177 million, after giving effect to an expected sales tax exemption worth
approximately $3.7 million.* The Company anticipates financing this project with cash on hand
and/or through the use of the Companys bi-lateral lines of credit.* As of June 30, 2007, the
Company had incurred approximately $9.5 million in costs related to this project. Of this amount,
approximately $7.4 million had been reserved through March 31, 2007. During the quarter ended June
30, 2007, the Company reversed this reserve following the execution of the KeySpan service
agreement and has discontinued reserving for Empire Connector project costs. As of June 30, 2007,
the Company capitalized all of the costs incurred to date related to this project as Construction
Work in Progress, as per the accounting guidance in the FERCs Uniform System of Accounts.
Supply Corporation continues to view its potential Tuscarora Extension project as an important
link to Millennium and potential storage development in the Corning, New York area.* This new
pipeline, which would expand the Supply Corporation system from its Tuscarora storage field to the
intersection of the proposed Millennium and Empire Connector pipelines, will be designed initially
to transport up to approximately 130 MDth of natural gas per day. It may also provide Supply
Corporation with the
opportunity to increase the deliverability of the existing Tuscarora storage field.* Supply
Corporation is evaluating the results of an Open Season seeking customers for new capacity from
the Rockies Express Project, Appalachian production, storage and other points to Leidy and to
interconnections with Millennium and Empire at Corning which, if successful, could include the
Tuscarora Extension. The project timeline depends on market development, and should the market
mature, the Company anticipates financing the Tuscarora Extension with cash on hand and/or through
the use of the Companys bi-lateral lines of credit.* There have been no costs incurred by the
Company related to this project as of June 30, 2007. The Company has not yet filed an application
with the FERC for the authority to build and operate the Tuscarora Extension.
-34-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Exploration and Production
The Exploration and Production segment capital expenditures for the nine months ended June 30,
2007 included approximately $25.5 million for Canada, $54.1 million for the Gulf Coast region
($53.7 million for the off-shore program in the Gulf of Mexico), $30.7 million for the West Coast
region and $28.0 million for the Appalachian region. The significant amount spent in the Gulf
Coast region is related to high commodity prices, which has improved the economics of investment in
the area, plus projected royalty relief. These amounts included approximately $18.6 million spent
to develop proved undeveloped reserves.
Timber
The majority of the Timber segment capital expenditures for the nine months ended June 30,
2007 were for the construction of two new dry kilns that were placed into service during the
quarter ended June 30, 2007, as well as construction of a lumber sorter for Highlands sawmill
operations, which is expected to be placed into service by the end of the current fiscal year.*
Corporate and All Other
The majority of the Corporate and All Other category expenditures for long-lived assets for
the nine months ended June 30, 2007 consisted of a $3.3 million capital contribution to Seneca
Energy by Horizon Power, $1.65 million in each of the first and second quarters of fiscal 2007.
Seneca Energy generates and sells electricity using methane gas obtained from landfills owned by
outside parties. Seneca Energy is in the process of expanding its generating capacity from 11.2
megawatts to 17.6 megawatts. Horizon Power has funded its capital contributions with short-term
borrowings.
The Company continuously evaluates capital expenditures and investments in corporations,
partnerships, and other business entities. The amounts are subject to modification for
opportunities such as the acquisition of attractive oil and gas properties, timber or natural gas
storage facilities and the expansion of transmission line capacities. While the majority of
capital expenditures in the Utility segment are necessitated by the continued need for replacement
and upgrading of mains and service lines, the magnitude of future capital expenditures or other
investments in the Companys other business segments depends, to a large degree, upon market
conditions.*
Financing Cash Flow
The Company did not have any outstanding short-term notes payable to banks or commercial paper
at June 30, 2007. However, the Company continues to consider short-term debt (consisting of
short-term notes payable to banks and commercial paper) an important source of cash for temporarily
financing capital expenditures and investments in corporations and/or partnerships, gas-in-storage
inventory, unrecovered purchased gas costs, margin calls on derivative financial instruments,
exploration and development expenditures, repurchases of stock, and other working capital needs.
Fluctuations in
these items can have a significant impact on the amount and timing of short-term debt. As for bank
loans, the Company maintains a number of individual (bi-lateral) uncommitted or discretionary lines
of credit with certain financial institutions for general corporate purposes. Borrowings under
these lines of credit are made at competitive market rates. These credit lines, which aggregate to
$455.0 million, are revocable at the option of the financial institutions and are reviewed on an
annual basis. The Company anticipates that these lines of credit will continue to be renewed, or
replaced by similar lines.* The total amount available to be issued under the Companys
commercial paper program is $300.0 million. The commercial paper program is backed by a syndicated
committed credit facility which totals $300.0 million and extends through September 30, 2010.
Under the Companys committed credit facility, the Company has agreed that its debt to
capitalization ratio will not exceed .65 at the last day of any fiscal quarter from September 30,
2005 through September 30, 2010. At June 30, 2007, the Companys debt to capitalization ratio (as
calculated under the facility) was .39. The constraints specified in the committed credit facility
would permit an additional $1.88 billion in short-term and/or long-term debt to be
outstanding (further limited by the
-35-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
indenture covenants discussed below) before the Companys debt to capitalization ratio would exceed .65. If a downgrade in any of the Companys credit ratings were to occur, access to the commercial
paper markets might not be possible.* However, the Company expects that it could borrow under its
uncommitted bank lines of credit or rely upon other liquidity sources, including cash provided by
operations.*
Under the Companys existing indenture covenants, at June 30, 2007, the Company would have
been permitted to issue up to a maximum of $1.3 billion in additional long-term unsecured
indebtedness at then-current market interest rates in addition to being able to issue new
indebtedness to replace maturing debt. The Companys present liquidity position is believed to be
adequate to satisfy known demands.*
The Companys 1974 indenture pursuant to which $399.0 million (or 40%) of the Companys
long-term debt (as of June 30, 2007) was issued contains a cross-default provision whereby the
failure by the Company to perform certain obligations under other borrowing arrangements could
trigger an obligation to repay the debt outstanding under the indenture. In particular, a
repayment obligation could be triggered if the Company fails (i) to pay any scheduled principal or
interest on any debt under any other indenture or agreement or (ii) to perform any other term in
any other such indenture or agreement, and the effect of the failure causes, or would permit the
holders of the debt to cause, the debt under such indenture or agreement to become due prior to its
stated maturity, unless cured or waived.
The Companys $300.0 million committed credit facility also contains a cross-default provision
whereby the failure by the Company or its significant subsidiaries to make payments under other
borrowing arrangements, or the occurrence of certain events affecting those other borrowing
arrangements, could trigger an obligation to repay any amounts outstanding under the committed
credit facility. In particular, a repayment obligation could be triggered if (i) the Company or
any of its significant subsidiaries fail to make a payment when due of any principal or interest on
any other indebtedness aggregating $20.0 million or more or (ii) an event occurs that causes, or
would permit the holders of any other indebtedness aggregating $20.0 million or more to cause, such
indebtedness to become due prior to its stated maturity. As of June 30, 2007, the Company had no
debt outstanding under the committed credit facility.
The Company has an effective registration statement on file with the SEC under which it has
available capacity to issue an additional $550.0 million of debt and equity securities under the
Securities Act of 1933. The Company may sell all or a portion of the remaining registered
securities if warranted by market conditions and the Companys capital requirements. Any offer and
sale of the above mentioned $550.0 million of debt and equity securities will be made only by means
of a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the rules and
regulations thereunder.
The amounts and timing of the issuance and sale of debt or equity securities will depend on
market conditions, indenture requirements, regulatory authorizations and the capital requirements
of the Company.
On April 30, 2007, the Company redeemed $96.3 million of 6.5% unsecured notes, plus accrued
interest. These notes were redeemable by the Company at par at any time after September 15, 2006.
On December 8, 2006, the Company repaid $22.8 million of Empires secured debt. Such amount was
classified as Current Portion of Long-Term Debt on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet at
September 30, 2006.
On December 8, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the Company to implement a
share repurchase program, whereby the Company may repurchase outstanding shares of common stock, up
to an aggregate amount of 8 million shares in the open market or through privately negotiated
transactions. As of June 30, 2007, the Company has repurchased 3,721,878 shares for $128.5
million under this program, including 1,195,328 shares for $43.3 million during the nine months
ended June 30, 2007. There were no shares repurchased during the quarter ended June 30, 2007 under
this program. These share repurchases were funded with cash provided by operating activities
and/or through the use of the Companys bi-lateral lines of credit. In the future, it is expected
that this share repurchase program will
-36-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
continue to be funded with cash provided by operating activities and/or through the use of the
Companys bi-lateral lines of credit.* It is expected that open market repurchases will continue
from time to time depending on market conditions.*
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company has entered into certain off-balance sheet financing arrangements. These
financing arrangements are primarily operating and capital leases. The Companys consolidated
subsidiaries have operating leases, the majority of which are with the Utility and the Pipeline and
Storage segments, having a remaining lease commitment of approximately $37.8 million. These leases
have been entered into for the use of buildings, vehicles, construction tools, meters, computer
equipment and other items and are accounted for as operating leases. The Companys unconsolidated
subsidiaries, which are accounted for under the equity method, have capital leases of electric
generating equipment having a remaining lease commitment of approximately $5.4 million. The Company
has guaranteed 50% or $2.7 million of these capital lease commitments.
OTHER MATTERS
In addition to the legal proceedings disclosed in Part II, Item 1 of this report, the Company
is involved in other litigation and regulatory matters arising in the normal course of business.
These other matters may include, for example, negligence claims and tax, regulatory or other
governmental audits, inspections, investigations or other proceedings. These matters may involve
state and federal taxes, safety, compliance with regulations, rate base, cost of service and
purchased gas cost issues, among other things. While these normal-course matters could have a
material effect on earnings and cash flows in the quarterly and annual period in which they are
resolved, they are not expected to change materially the Companys present liquidity position, nor
to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.*
Market Risk Sensitive Instruments
For a complete discussion of market risk sensitive instruments, refer to Market Risk
Sensitive Instruments in Item 7 of the Companys 2006 Form 10-K. There have been no subsequent
material changes to the Companys exposure to market risk sensitive instruments.
Rate and Regulatory Matters
Utility Operation
Base rate adjustments in both the New York and Pennsylvania rate jurisdictions do not reflect
the recovery of purchased gas costs. Such costs are recovered through operation of the purchased
gas adjustment clauses of the appropriate regulatory authorities.
New York Jurisdiction
On August 27, 2004, Distribution Corporation commenced a rate case by filing proposed tariff
amendments and supporting testimony requesting approval to increase its annual revenues beginning
October 1, 2004. Various parties opposed the filing. On April 15, 2005, Distribution Corporation,
the parties and others executed an agreement settling all outstanding issues. In an order issued
July 22, 2005, the NYPSC approved the April 15, 2005 settlement agreement, substantially as filed,
for an effective date of August 1, 2005. The settlement agreement provided for a rate increase of
$21 million by means of the elimination of bill credits ($5.8 million) and an increase in base
rates ($15.2 million). For the two-year term of the agreement and until new rates should go into
effect, the return on equity level above which earnings must be shared with rate payers is 11.5%.
-37-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
On January 29, 2007, Distribution Corporation commenced a rate case by filing proposed tariff
amendments and supporting testimony requesting approval to increase its annual revenues by $52.0
million. Following standard procedure, the NYPSC suspended the proposed tariff amendments to
enable its staff and intervenors to conduct a routine investigation and hold hearings.
Distribution Corporation explained in the filing that its request for rate relief is necessitated
by decreased revenues resulting from customer conservation efforts and increased customer
uncollectibles, among other things. The rate filing also includes a proposal for an aggressive
efficiency and conservation initiative with a revenue decoupling mechanism designed to render the
Company indifferent to throughput reductions resulting from conservation. The NYPSC may accept,
reject or modify the Companys filing. Assuming standard procedure, rates would become effective
in late December 2007. The outcome of the proceeding cannot be ascertained at this time. In an
unrelated action, on April 30, 2007, the NYPSC adopted a generic order finding that energy
efficiency and conservation programs can create significant cost savings for customers. The
order further states that existing rate designs still may discourage utilities from actively
promoting energy efficiency. To address these disincentives, the order directs utilities,
including Distribution Corporation, to develop proposals for true-up based delivery service revenue
decoupling mechanisms, among other things. Distribution Corporation believes that the conservation
initiative and revenue decoupling mechanism submitted with its rate case is generally consistent
with the requirements of the April 30, 2007 directive.
Pennsylvania Jurisdiction
On June 1, 2006, Distribution Corporation filed proposed tariff amendments with PaPUC to
increase annual revenues by $25.9 million to cover increases in the cost of service to be effective
July 30, 2006. The rate request was filed to address increased costs associated with Distribution
Corporations ongoing construction program as well as increases in operating costs, particularly
uncollectible accounts. Following standard regulatory procedure, the PaPUC issued an order on July
20, 2006 instituting a rate proceeding and suspending the proposed tariff amendments until March 2,
2007. On October 2, 2006, the parties, including Distribution Corporation, Staff of the PaPUC and
intervenors, executed an agreement (Settlement) proposing to settle all issues in the rate
proceeding. The Settlement includes an increase in annual revenues of $14.3 million to non-gas
revenues, an agreement not to file a rate case until January 28, 2008 at the earliest and an early
implementation date. The Settlement was approved by the PaPUC at its meeting on November 30, 2006,
and the new rates became effective January 1, 2007.
On June 8, 2006, the NTSB issued safety recommendations to Distribution Corporation, the PaPUC
and certain other parties as a result of an investigation of a natural gas explosion that occurred
on Distribution Corporations system in Dubois, Pennsylvania in August 2004. The explosion
destroyed a
residence, resulting in the death of two people who lived there, and damaged a number of other
houses in the immediate vicinity.
The NTSB and Distribution Corporation differ in their assessment of the probable cause of the
explosion. The NTSB determined that the probable cause was the fracture of a defective
butt-fusion joint which had joined two sections of plastic pipe, and the failure of Distribution
Corporation to have an adequate program to inspect butt-fusion joints and replace those joints not
meeting its inspection criteria. Based on the report of its third-party plastic pipe expert and
other relevant evidence, Distribution Corporation believes that the probable cause was the improper
excavation and backfill operations of a third party that had worked in the vicinity of Distribution
Corporations pipeline. The NTSB has noted Distribution Corporations disagreement with the NTSBs
finding of probable cause and has forwarded to its pipeline staff the information provided by
Distribution Corporation.
The NTSBs safety recommendations to Distribution Corporation involved revisions to its
butt-fusion procedures for joining plastic pipe, and revisions to its procedures for qualifying
personnel who perform plastic fusions. Although not required by law to do so, Distribution
Corporation implemented those recommendations. In December 2006, the NTSB classified its
recommendations as closed after determining that Distribution Corporation took acceptable action
with respect to the recommendations.
-38-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
The NTSBs recommendation to the PaPUC was to require an analysis of the integrity of
butt-fusion joints in Distribution Corporations system and replacement of those joints that are
determined to have unacceptable characteristics. Distribution Corporation is working cooperatively
with the Staff of the PaPUC to permit the PaPUC to undertake the analysis recommended by the NTSB.
Specifically, Distribution has done the following, in agreement with the PaPUC Staff:
|
(i) |
|
Distribution Corporation uncovered a limited number of butt-fusions at two
locations designated by the PaPUC Staff; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Commencing July 6, 2006, Distribution Corporation has uncovered additional
butt- fusions throughout its Pennsylvania service area as it has uncovered
facilities for other purposes; when a butt-fusion has been uncovered, Distribution
Corporation has notified the designated PaPUC Staff representative to permit
inspection of the quality of the fusion. Distribution Corporation has removed a
number of fusions for further evaluation. |
Distribution Corporation met with the PaPUC Staff in August 2006 to review findings to date
and to discuss further procedures to facilitate the analysis. Distribution Corporation and the
PaPUC Staff agreed to submit several of the butt-fusion specimens removed during the inspection
process to an independent testing laboratory to assess the integrity of the fusions (and to provide
an evaluation of the sampling procedure employed). Distribution Corporation and the PaPUC Staff
have agreed upon procedures to test the butt-fusion specimens. Distribution Corporation
anticipates that it will continue to meet with the PaPUC Staff to review findings pertaining to
this matter and address any integrity concerns that may be identified.* At this time, Distribution
Corporation is unable to predict the outcome of the analysis or of any negotiations or proceedings
that may result from it. Distribution Corporations response to the actions of the PaPUC will
depend on its assessment of the validity of the PaPUCs analysis and conclusions.
Without admitting liability, Distribution Corporation has settled all significant third-party
claims against it related to the explosion. Distribution Corporation has been committed to
providing safe and reliable service throughout its service territory and firmly believes, based on
information presently known, that its system continues to be safe and reliable. According to the
Plastics Pipe Institute, plastic pipe today accounts for over 90% of the pipe installed for the
natural gas distribution industry in the United States and Canada. Distribution Corporation, along
with many other natural gas utilities operating in the
United States, has relied extensively upon the use of plastic pipe in its natural gas distribution
system since the 1970s.
Pipeline and Storage
Supply Corporation currently does not have a rate case on file with the FERC. The rate
settlement approved by the FERC on February 9, 2007 requires Supply Corporation to make a general
rate filing to be effective December 1, 2011, and bars Supply Corporation from making a general
rate filing before then, with some exceptions specified in the settlement.
Empire currently does not have a rate case on file with the NYPSC. Among the issues resolved
in connection with Empires FERC application to build the Empire Connector are the rates and terms
of service that will become applicable to all of Empires business, effective upon Empire
constructing and placing its new facilities into service (currently expected for November 2008).*
At that time, Empire would become an interstate pipeline subject to FERC regulation.*
The FERC issued on December 21, 2006 an order granting a Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity authorizing the construction and operation of the Empire Connector and various other
related pipeline projects by other unaffiliated companies. The Empire Certificate contains various
environmental and other conditions. Empire has accepted that Certificate. Additional environmental
permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and state environmental agencies have been received.
Empire has also received, from all six upstate New York counties in which it would build the Empire
Connector project, final approval (but not yet final documentation) of sales tax exemptions and
temporary partial property tax abatements necessary to enable the Empire Connector to generate
a fair return. In
-39-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
June 2007, Empire signed a firm transportation service agreement with KeySpan Gas East Corporation,
under which Empire is obligated to provide transportation service that will require construction of
this project. Construction is planned to begin in fall 2007 and be complete by November 1, 2008.*
Environmental Matters
The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to
the protection of the environment. The Company has established procedures for the ongoing
evaluation of its operations to identify potential environmental exposures and comply with
regulatory policies and procedures. It is the Companys policy to accrue estimated environmental
clean-up costs (investigation and remediation) when such amounts can reasonably be estimated and it
is probable that the Company will be required to incur such costs.
The Company received, in 1998 and again in October 1999, notice that the NYDEC believes the
Company is responsible for contamination discovered at a former manufactured gas plant site in New
York for which the Company had not been named as a potentially responsible party. In February
2007, the NYDEC identified the Company as a potentially responsible party for the site and issued
a proposed remedial action plan. The NYDEC estimated clean-up costs under its proposed remedy to
be $8.9 million if implemented. Although the Company commented to the NYDEC that the proposed
remedial action plan contained a number of material errors, omissions and procedural defects, the
NYDEC, in a March 2007 Record of Decision, selected the remedy it had previously proposed. In
July 2007, the Company appealed the NYDECs Record of Decision to the New York State Supreme
Court, Albany County. The Company believes that a negotiated resolution with the NYDEC regarding
the site remains possible.
At June 30, 2007, the Company has estimated its remaining clean-up costs related to former
manufactured gas plant sites and third party waste disposal sites (including the former
manufactured gas plant site discussed above) will be in the range of $12.3 million to $16.0
million.* The minimum estimated liability of $12.3 million has been recorded on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet at June 30, 2007. The Company expects to recover its environmental clean-up costs
from a combination of rate recovery and insurance proceeds.*
The Company is currently not aware of any material additional exposure to environmental
liabilities. However, changes in environmental regulations or other factors could adversely
impact the Company.*
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by
prescribing a minimum probability threshold that a tax position must meet before a financial
statement benefit is recognized. The minimum threshold is defined in FIN 48 as a tax position that
is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority,
including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits
of the position. The cumulative effect of applying FIN 48 at adoption, if any, is to be reported
as an adjustment to opening retained earnings for the year of adoption. FIN 48 is effective for
the first quarter of the Companys 2008 fiscal year. The Company is currently assessing the
potential effect of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157. SFAS 157 provides guidance for using fair value
to measure assets and liabilities. The pronouncement serves to clarify the extent to which
companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value,
and the effect that fair-value measurements have on earnings. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on its consolidated financial statements. SFAS
157 is to be applied whenever another standard requires or allows assets or liabilities to be
measured at fair value. The pronouncement is effective as of the Companys first quarter of fiscal
2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on
its consolidated financial statements.
-40-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158, an amendment of SFAS 87, SFAS 88, SFAS 106, and
SFAS 132R. SFAS 158 requires that companies recognize a net liability or asset to report the
underfunded or overfunded status of their defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit
plans on their balance sheets, as well as recognize changes in the funded status of a defined
benefit post-retirement plan in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income.
The pronouncement also specifies that a plans assets and obligations that determine its funded
status be measured as of the end of Companys fiscal year, with limited exceptions. The Company is
required to recognize the funded status of its benefit plans and the disclosure requirements of
SFAS 158 by the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. The requirement to measure the plan assets and
benefit obligations as of the Companys fiscal year-end date will be adopted by the Company by the
end of fiscal 2009. Currently, the Company measures its plan assets and benefit obligations using
a June 30th measurement date. If the Company recognized the funded status of its
pension and post-retirement benefit plans at September 30, 2006, the Companys Consolidated Balance
Sheet would reflect a liability of $232.5 million instead of the prepaid pension and
post-retirement costs of $64.1 million and post-retirement liabilities of $32.9 million that were
presented on the balance sheet at September 30, 2006. The Company expects that it will record a
regulatory asset for the majority of this liability with the remainder reflected in accumulated
other comprehensive income. The Company will recalculate the funded status of its pension and
post-retirement benefit plans during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. The difference between
what the Company currently records on its Consolidated Balance Sheet for its pension and
post-retirement benefit obligations and what it will be required to record under SFAS 158 is due to
certain unrecognized actuarial gains and losses and unrecognized prior service costs for both the
pension and other post-retirement benefit plans as well as an unrecognized transition obligation
for the other post-retirement benefit plan. These amounts are not required to be recorded on the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet under the current accounting standards, but were instead
amortized over a period of time.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not otherwise required to
be measured at fair value under GAAP. A company that elects the fair value option for an eligible
item will
be required to recognize in current earnings any changes in that items fair value in
reporting periods subsequent to the date of adoption. SFAS 159 is effective as of the Companys
first quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the
adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements
The Company is including the following cautionary statement in this Form 10-Q to make
applicable and take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 for any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company.
Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, projections,
strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements which are
other than statements of historical facts. From time to time, the Company may publish or otherwise
make available forward-looking statements of this nature. All such subsequent forward-looking
statements, whether written or oral and whether made by or on behalf of the Company, are also
expressly qualified by these cautionary statements. Certain statements contained in this report,
including, without limitation, those which are designated with an asterisk (*) and those which
are identified by the use of the words anticipates, estimates, expects, intends, plans,
predicts, projects, and similar expressions, are forward-looking statements as defined in the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and accordingly involve risks and uncertainties
which could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in the
forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are based on various
assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions. The Companys
expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith and are believed by the Company
to have a reasonable basis, including, without limitation, managements examination of historical
operating trends, data contained in the Companys records and other data available from third
parties, but there can be no assurance that managements expectations, beliefs or projections will
result or be achieved or accomplished. In addition to other factors and matters discussed
elsewhere herein, the following are important factors that, in the view of the Company, could cause
actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements:
-41-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
|
1. |
|
Changes in laws and regulations to which the Company is subject, including changes in tax,
environmental, safety and employment laws and regulations; |
|
|
2. |
|
Changes in economic conditions, including economic disruptions caused by terrorist
activities, acts of war or major accidents; |
|
|
3. |
|
Changes in demographic patterns and weather conditions, including the occurrence of severe
weather such as hurricanes; |
|
|
4. |
|
Changes in the availability and/or price of natural gas or oil and the effect of such
changes on the accounting treatment or valuation of derivative financial instruments or the
Companys natural gas and oil reserves; |
|
|
5. |
|
Impairments under the SECs full cost ceiling test for natural gas and oil reserves; |
|
|
6. |
|
Changes in the availability and/or price of derivative financial instruments; |
|
|
7. |
|
Changes in the price differentials between various types of oil; |
|
|
8. |
|
Inability to obtain new customers or retain existing ones; |
|
|
9. |
|
Significant changes in competitive factors affecting the Company; |
|
|
10. |
|
Governmental/regulatory actions, initiatives and proceedings, including those involving
acquisitions, financings, rate cases (which address, among other things, allowed rates of
return, rate design and retained gas), affiliate relationships, industry structure, franchise
renewal, and environmental/safety requirements; |
|
|
11. |
|
Unanticipated impacts of restructuring initiatives in the natural gas and electric
industries; |
|
|
12. |
|
Significant changes from expectations in actual capital expenditures and operating expenses
and unanticipated project delays or changes in project costs or plans; |
|
|
13. |
|
The nature and projected profitability of pending and potential projects and other
investments, and the ability to obtain necessary governmental approvals and permits; |
|
|
14. |
|
Occurrences affecting the Companys ability to obtain funds from operations or from issuances
of short-term notes or debt or equity securities to finance needed capital expenditures and
other investments, including any downgrades in the Companys credit ratings; |
|
|
15. |
|
Uncertainty of oil and gas reserve estimates; |
|
|
16. |
|
Ability to successfully identify and finance acquisitions or other investments and ability to
operate and integrate existing and any subsequently acquired business or properties; |
|
|
17. |
|
Ability to successfully identify, drill for and produce economically viable natural gas and
oil reserves; |
|
|
18. |
|
Significant changes from expectations in the Companys actual production levels for natural
gas or oil; |
|
|
19. |
|
Regarding foreign operations, changes in trade and monetary policies, inflation and exchange
rates, taxes, operating conditions, laws and regulations related to foreign operations, and
political and governmental changes; |
|
|
20. |
|
Significant changes in tax rates or policies or in rates of inflation or interest; |
-42-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (Concl.)
21. |
|
Significant changes in the Companys relationship with its employees or contractors and the
potential adverse effects if labor disputes, grievances or shortages were to occur; |
|
22. |
|
Changes in accounting principles or the application of such principles to the Company; |
|
23. |
|
The cost and effects of legal and administrative claims against the Company; |
|
24. |
|
Changes in actuarial assumptions and the return on assets with respect to the Companys
retirement plan and post-retirement benefit plans; |
|
25. |
|
Increasing health care costs and the resulting effect on health insurance premiums and on the
obligation to provide post-retirement benefits; or |
|
26. |
|
Increasing costs of insurance, changes in coverage and the ability to obtain insurance. |
The Company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect
events or circumstances after the date hereof.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Refer to the Market Risk Sensitive Instruments section in Item 2 MD&A.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The term disclosure controls and procedures is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act. These rules refer to the controls and other procedures of a company that
are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that
it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
required time periods. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls
and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and
communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial
officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Companys
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of June 30, 2007.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended June 30, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In an action instituted in the New York State Supreme Court, Kings County on February 18, 2003
against Distribution Corporation and Paul J. Hissin, an unaffiliated third party, plaintiff Donna
Fordham-Coleman, as administratrix of the estate of Velma Arlene Fordham, alleges that Distribution
Corporations failure to initiate natural gas service, despite an attempt to do so, at an apartment
leased to the plaintiffs decedent, Velma Arlene Fordham, caused the decedents death in February
2001. The plaintiff sought damages for wrongful death and pain and suffering, plus punitive
damages. Distribution Corporation denied plaintiffs material allegations, asserted seven
affirmative defenses and asserted a cross-claim
-43-
Item 1. Legal Proceedings (Concl.)
against the co-defendant. Distribution Corporation believes, and has vigorously asserted, that
plaintiffs allegations lack merit. The court changed venue of the action to New York State
Supreme Court, Erie County. Discovery closed in October 2005, and Distribution Corporation filed a
motion for summary judgment in November 2005. In February 2006, the court granted Distribution
Corporations motion for summary judgment to dismiss plaintiffs claims for wrongful death and
punitive damages. The court denied Distribution Corporations motion for summary judgment to
dismiss plaintiffs negligence claim seeking recovery for conscious pain and suffering. Also in
February 2006, the court dismissed all claims (including Distribution Corporations cross-claim)
against defendant Hissin. In March 2006, the plaintiff appealed the courts dismissal of the
wrongful death and punitive damages claims, and Distribution Corporation appealed the courts
denial of its motion to dismiss the negligence claim for pain and suffering. In April 2007, the
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department, of the New York State Supreme Court reinstated the
plaintiffs wrongful death and punitive damages claims and denied Distribution Corporations
appeal. A trial is scheduled to begin October 15, 2007.
On June 8, 2006, the NTSB issued safety recommendations to Distribution Corporation, the PaPUC
and certain others as a result of its investigation of a natural gas explosion that occurred on
Distribution Corporations system in Dubois, Pennsylvania in August 2004. For a discussion of this
matter, refer to Part I, Item 2 MD&A of this report under the heading Other Matters Rate and
Regulatory Matters.
The Company believes, based on the information presently known, that the ultimate resolution
of the above matters will not be material to the consolidated financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flow of the Company.* No assurances can be given, however, as to the ultimate
outcome of these matters, and it is possible that the outcome could be material to results of
operations or cash flow for a particular quarter or annual
period.*
For a discussion of various environmental and other matters, refer to Part I, Item 1 at Note 4
Commitments and Contingencies, and Part I, Item 2 MD&A of this report under the heading Other
Matters Environmental Matters.
In addition to the matters disclosed above, the Company is involved in other litigation and
regulatory matters arising in the normal course of business. These other matters may include, for
example, negligence claims and tax, regulatory or other governmental audits, inspections,
investigations or other proceedings. These matters may involve state and federal taxes, safety,
compliance with regulations, rate base, cost of service, and purchased gas cost issues, among other
things. While these normal-course matters could have a material effect on earnings and cash flows
in the quarterly and annual period in which they are resolved, they are not expected to change
materially the Companys present liquidity position, nor to have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition of the Company.*
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The risk factors in Item 1A of the Companys 2006 Form 10-K, as amended by Item 1A of the
Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, have not materially changed other than
as set forth below. The information presented below supersedes the risk factor having the same
caption in the 2006 Form 10-K and should otherwise be read in conjunction with all of the risk
factors disclosed in that Form 10-K and the December 31, 2006 Form 10-Q.
The nature of National Fuels operations presents inherent risks of loss that could adversely
affect its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
National Fuels operations in its various segments are subject to inherent hazards and risks
such as: fires; natural disasters; explosions; geological formations with abnormal pressures;
blowouts during well drilling; collapses of wellbore casing or other tubulars; pipeline ruptures;
spills; and other hazards and risks that may cause personal injury, death, property damage,
environmental damage or business interruption losses. Additionally, National Fuels facilities,
machinery, and equipment may be subject to sabotage. Any of these events could cause a loss of
hydrocarbons, environmental pollution, claims for
-44-
Item 1A. Risk Factors (Concl.)
personal injury, death, property damage or business interruption, or governmental investigations,
recommendations, claims, fines or penalties. As protection against operational hazards, National
Fuel maintains insurance coverage against some, but not all, potential losses. In addition, many
of the agreements that National Fuel executes with contractors provide for the division of
responsibilities between the contractor and National Fuel, and National Fuel seeks to obtain an
indemnification from the contractor for certain of these risks. National Fuel is not always able,
however, to secure written agreements with its contractors that contain indemnification, and
sometimes National Fuel is required to indemnify others.
Insurance or indemnification agreements when obtained may not adequately protect National Fuel
against liability from all of the consequences of the hazards described above. The occurrence of
an event not fully insured or indemnified against, the imposition of fines, penalties or mandated
programs by governmental authorities, the failure of a contractor to meet its indemnification
obligations, or the failure of an insurance company to pay valid claims could result in substantial
losses to National Fuel. In addition, insurance may not be available, or if available may not be
adequate, to cover any or all of these risks. It is also possible that insurance premiums or other
costs may rise significantly in the future, so as to make such insurance prohibitively expensive.
Due to large insurance losses caused by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005, the insurance
industry significantly increased premiums for insurance on Gulf of Mexico properties, and reduced
the limits typically available for windstorm damage. As a result, National Fuel determined that it
was not economical to purchase insurance to fully cover its exposures in the Gulf of Mexico in the
event of a
named windstorm. National Fuel has procured named windstorm coverage in an amount equal to
approximately five times the estimated physical damage loss sustained by National Fuel as a result
of named windstorms during the 2005 hurricane season, subject to a deductible of $2.5 million per
occurrence. No assurance can be given, however, that such amount will be sufficient to cover
losses that may occur in the future.
Hazards and risks faced by National Fuel, and insurance and indemnification obtained or
provided by National Fuel, may subject National Fuel to litigation or administrative proceedings
from time to time. Such litigation or proceedings could result in substantial monetary judgments,
fines or penalties against National Fuel or be resolved on unfavorable terms, the result of which
could have a material adverse effect on National Fuels results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On April 2, 2007, the Company issued a total of 2,400 unregistered shares of Company common
stock to the eight non-employee directors of the Company serving on the Board of Directors, 300
shares to each such director. All of these unregistered shares were issued as partial
consideration for the directors services during the quarter ended June 30, 2007, pursuant to the
Companys Retainer Policy for Non-Employee Directors. These transactions were exempt from
registration by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as transactions not involving a public
offering.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Announced Share |
|
Under Share |
|
|
Shares |
|
Average Price |
|
Repurchase Plans |
|
Repurchase Plans |
Period |
|
Purchased(a) |
|
Paid per Share |
|
or Programs |
|
or Programs (b) |
|
Apr. 1 - 30, 2007 |
|
|
333,354 |
|
|
$ |
45.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,278,122 |
|
May 1 - 31, 2007 |
|
|
7,526 |
|
|
$ |
46.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,278,122 |
|
June 1 - 30, 2007 |
|
|
28,154 |
|
|
$ |
44.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,278,122 |
|
Total |
|
|
369,034 |
|
|
$ |
45.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,278,122 |
|
-45-
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds (Concl.)
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents (i) shares of common stock of the Company purchased on the open
market with Company matching contributions for the accounts of participants in the Companys
401(k) plans, and (ii) shares of common stock of the Company tendered to the Company by
holders of stock options or shares of restricted stock for the payment of option exercise
prices or applicable withholding taxes. During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, the Company
did not purchase any shares of its common stock pursuant to its publicly announced share
repurchase program. Of the 369,034 shares purchased other than through a publicly announced
share repurchase program, 23,592 were purchased for the Companys 401(k) plans and 345,442
were purchased as a result of shares tendered to the Company by holders of stock options or
shares of restricted stock. |
|
(b) |
|
On December 8, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of
up to eight million shares of the Companys common stock. Repurchases may be made from time
to time in the open market or through private transactions. |
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
3(ii)
|
|
By-Laws: |
|
|
|
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company By-Laws as amended June 7, 2007
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1, Form 8-K dated June 8,
2007). |
|
|
|
4
|
|
Instruments defining the rights of security holders: |
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2007,
between National Fuel Gas Company and HSBC Bank USA, National
Association, as rights agent (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.1, Form 8-K dated June 8, 2007). |
|
|
|
12
|
|
Statements regarding Computation of Ratios: |
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the Twelve Months Ended June
30, 2007 and the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2002 through 2006. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Written statements of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Written statements of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
99
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company Consolidated Statement of Income for
the Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. |
-46-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY
(Registrant)
|
|
|
/s/ R. J. Tanski
|
|
|
R. J. Tanski |
|
|
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ K. M. Camiolo
|
|
|
K. M. Camiolo |
|
|
Controller and Principal Accounting Officer |
|
|
Date: August 3, 2007
-47-