Edgar Filing: OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period ended March 31, 2013

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-12043

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		98-0080034
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

85 Broad Street

New York, New York 10004

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(212) 668-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

None

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares of the Company’s Class A non-voting common stock and Class B voting common stock (being the only classes of common stock of the Company) outstanding on April 30, 2013 was 13,508,318 and 99,680 shares, respectively.

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

INDEX


		Page No.

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012		2

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012		4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012		5

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012		6

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012		8

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		9

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		45

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		60

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		60

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		61

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		68

Item 6.	Exhibits		68
	Signatures		69

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)


	March 31,		December 31,
(Expressed in thousands of dollars)	2013		2012
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	98,778	$	135,366
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes		37,164		33,000
Deposits with clearing organizations		24,576		25,954
Receivable from brokers and clearing organizations		290,955		479,699
Receivable from customers, net of allowance for credit losses of $2,239 ($2,256 in 2012)		881,514		817,941
Income tax receivable		13,980		451
Securities owned, including amounts pledged of $391,900 ($569,995 in 2012), at fair value		848,329		759,742
Notes receivable, net		45,030		47,324
Office facilities, net		30,938		28,332
Deferred tax assets, net		1,780		16,340
Intangible assets, net		31,700		31,700
Goodwill		137,889		137,889
Other assets		186,534		164,282

	$	2,629,167	$	2,678,020

(Continued on next page)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)


	March 31,		December 31,
(Expressed in thousands of dollars)	2013		2012
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Drafts payable	$	44,927	$	56,586
Bank call loans		204,000		128,300
Payable to brokers and clearing organizations		215,612		204,218
Payable to customers		607,034		692,378
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		544,136		392,391
Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value		63,046		173,450
Accrued compensation		97,887		150,434
Accounts payable and other liabilities		148,617		180,262
Senior secured notes		195,000		195,000

	$	2,120,259	$	2,173,019

Stockholders’ equity
Share capital
Class A non-voting common stock (13,508,318 shares issued and outstanding)		62,048		62,048
Class B voting common stock (99,680 shares issued and outstanding)		133		133

		62,181		62,181
Contributed capital		40,291		39,231
Retained earnings		401,287		399,121
Accumulated other comprehensive income		658		207

Total Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. stockholders’ equity		504,417		500,740
Non-controlling interest		4,491		4,261

		508,908		505,001

	$	2,629,167	$	2,678,020

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)


	Three Months Ended
(Expressed in thousands of dollars, except share and per share amounts)	March 31, 2013		March 31, 2012
REVENUE
Commissions	$	119,580	$	125,634
Principal transactions, net		15,717		12,555
Interest		12,371		13,393
Investment banking		18,448		20,087
Advisory fees		56,720		50,077
Other		16,310		16,468

		239,146		238,214

EXPENSES
Compensation and related expenses		159,209		158,651
Clearing and exchange fees		6,042		6,031
Communications and technology		15,864		16,138
Occupancy and equipment costs		17,565		24,344
Interest		6,862		8,792
Other		26,891		30,747

		232,433		244,703

Income (loss) before income taxes		6,713		(6,489	)
Income tax provision (benefit)		2,820		(2,606	)

Net income (loss) for the period		3,893		(3,883	)
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest, net of tax		230		774

Net income (loss) attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	$	3,663	$	(4,657	)

Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.
Basic	$	0.27	$	(0.34	)
Diluted	$	0.26	$	(0.34	)
Weighted average shares
Basic		13,607,998		13,597,330
Diluted		14,028,715		13,597,330

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (unaudited)

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,


(Expressed in thousands of dollars)	2013		2012
Net income (loss) for the period	$	3,893	$	(3,883	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) Currency translation adjustment		451		(366	)

Comprehensive income (loss) for the period	$	4,344	$	(4,249	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,


(Expressed in thousands of dollars)	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss) for the period	$	3,893		$	(3,883	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities
Non-cash items included in net income (loss):
Depreciation and amortization of office facilities and leasehold improvements		2,514			2,845
Deferred income taxes		14,560			(6,666	)
Amortization of notes receivable		4,739			4,870
Amortization of debt issuance costs		160			99
Amortization of intangible assets		—			3,212
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses		(17	)		178
Share-based compensation		1,879			1,259
Decrease (increase) in operating assets:
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes		(4,164	)		(2,283	)
Deposits with clearing organizations		1,378			(20,321	)
Receivable from brokers and clearing organizations		188,744			(53,117	)
Receivable from customers		(63,556	)		(34,376	)
Income tax receivable		(13,529	)		4,016
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		—			847,199
Securities owned		(88,587	)		(21,883	)
Notes receivable		(2,445	)		(4,412	)
Other assets		(21,961	)		72,769
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Drafts payable		(11,659	)		(10,656	)
Payable to brokers and clearing organizations		11,394			38,458
Payable to customers		(85,344	)		63,897
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		151,745			(860,700	)
Securities sold, but not yet purchased		(110,404	)		20,993
Accrued compensation		(53,366	)		(51,436	)
Accounts payable and other liabilities		(31,645	)		(30,965	)

Cash used in operating activities		(105,671	)		(40,903	)

(Continued on next page)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,


(Expressed in thousands of dollars)	2013			2012
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of office facilities	$	(5,120	)	$	(4,711	)

Cash used in investing activities		(5,120	)		(4,711	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Cash dividends paid on Class A non-voting and Class B voting common stock		(1,497	)		(1,495	)
Repurchase of Class A non-voting common stock for cancellation		—			(1,551	)
Tax benefit from share-based awards		—			41
Increase in bank call loans, net		75,700			65,100

Cash provided by financing activities		74,203			62,095

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(36,588	)		16,481
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		135,366			70,329

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	98,778		$	86,810

Schedule of non-cash financing activities
Employee share plan issuance	$	—		$	224
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	2,171		$	4,038
Cash paid (refunded) during the period for income taxes	$	1,725		$	(20	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (unaudited)

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,


(Expressed in thousands of dollars)	2013			2012
Share capital
Balance at beginning of period	$	62,181		$	62,726
Issuance of Class a non-voting common stock		—			224
Repurchase of Class A non-voting common stock for cancellation		—			(1,551	)

Balance at end of period	$	62,181		$	61,399

Contributed capital
Balance at beginning of period	$	39,231		$	36,832
Tax benefit from share-based awards		—			41
Share-based expense		1,060			974
Vested employee share plan awards		—			(180	)

Balance at end of period	$	40,291		$	37,667

Retained earnings
Balance at beginning of period	$	399,121		$	408,720
Net income (loss) attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.		3,663			(4,657	)
Dividends paid ($0.11 per share)		(1,497	)		(1,495	)

Balance at end of period	$	401,287		$	402,568

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance at beginning of period	$	207		$	(208	)
Currency translation adjustment		451			(366	)

Balance at end of period	$	658		$	(574	)

Stockholders’ equity of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	$	504,417		$	501,060
Non-controlling interest
Balance at beginning of period	$	4,261		$	5,333
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest, net of tax		230			774

Balance at end of period	$	4,491		$	6,107

Total Stockholders’ Equity	$	508,908		$	507,167

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Basis of Presentation

Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (“OPY”) is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OPY and its subsidiaries (together, the “Company”). The principal subsidiaries of OPY are Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. (“Oppenheimer”), a registered broker dealer in securities, Oppenheimer Asset Management Inc. (“OAM”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Oppenheimer Investment Management Inc. (“OIM”), both registered investment advisors under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940, Oppenheimer Trust Company (“Oppenheimer Trust”), a limited purpose trust company chartered by the State of New Jersey to provide fiduciary services such as trust and estate administration and investment management, Oppenheimer Multifamily Housing and Healthcare Finance, Inc. (“OMHHF”), which is engaged in mortgage brokerage and servicing, and OPY Credit Corp., which offers syndication as well as trading of issued corporate loans. Oppenheimer Europe Ltd., based in the United Kingdom, with an office in the Isle of Jersey, provides institutional equities and fixed income brokerage and corporate financial services and is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Oppenheimer Investments Asia Limited, based in Hong Kong, China, provides assistance in accessing the U.S. equities markets and limited mergers and acquisitions advisory services to Asia-based companies.

Oppenheimer provides its services from 94 offices in 26 states located throughout the United States and in 6 foreign jurisdictions. Oppenheimer owns Freedom Investments, Inc. (“Freedom”), a registered broker dealer in securities, which also operates as the BUYandHOLD division of Freedom, offering on-line discount brokerage and dollar-based investing services, and Oppenheimer Israel (OPCO) Ltd., which is engaged in offering investment services in the State of Israel. Freedom has been approved to operate as a representative office in Beijing, China. Oppenheimer holds a trading permit on the New York Stock Exchange and is a member of several other regional exchanges in the United States.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Form 10-K”). The accompanying December 31, 2012 condensed consolidated statement of balance sheet data was derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statement purposes and reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts that are reported in the financial statements and the accompanying disclosures. Although these estimates are based on management’s knowledge of current events and actions that the Company may undertake in the future, actual results may differ materially from the estimates. The consolidated results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2013 is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future interim or annual period.

Accounting standards require the Company to present non-controlling interests as a separate component of stockholders’ equity on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet. On September 28, 2012, the Company purchased additional shares of OMHHF for $3 million, representing 16.32% of OMHHF. As of March 31, 2013, the Company owned 83.68% of OMHHF and the non-controlling interest recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheet was $4.5 million.

2. New accounting pronouncements

Recently Adopted

On July 27, 2012, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2012-02, “Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment,” which gives entities the option of performing a qualitative assessment before the quantitative analysis. If entities determine the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not less than the carrying amount, the impairment needs to be assessed. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012 and early adoption is permitted. The Company evaluated this ASU and decided to continue to perform quantitative analysis for indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment.

On December 31, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities”, which requires new disclosures about balance sheet offsetting and related arrangements. For derivatives and financial assets and liabilities, the ASU requires disclosure of gross asset and liability amounts, amounts offset on the balance sheet, and amounts subject to the offsetting requirements but not offset on the balance sheet. In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, “Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures About Offsetting Assets and Liabilities”. The ASU clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements established by ASU No. 2011-11. The ASU limits the scope of the new balance sheet offsetting disclosures in ASU No. 2011-11 to derivatives, repurchase agreements, and securities lending transactions. The effective date of the ASU coincides with the effective date of the disclosure requirements in ASU No. 2011-11. The Company adopted this guidance in the period ended March 31, 2013. See Note 5, Financial Instruments.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”. The ASU requires an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety from accumulated other comprehensive income to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The Company adopted this guidance in the period ended March 31, 2013.

3. Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share was computed by dividing net income attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. by the weighted average number of shares of Class A non-voting common stock (“Class A Stock”) and Class B voting common stock (“Class B Stock”) Stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share includes the weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B Stock outstanding and the effects of the warrants using the treasury method and options to purchase the Class A Stock and restricted stock awards of Class A Stock using the treasury stock method.

Earnings per share has been calculated as follows:


	Three months ended March 31,
(expressed in thousands of dollars, except share and per share amounts)	2013		2012
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding		13,607,998		13,597,330
Net dilutive effect of warrant, treasury method (1)		—		—
Net dilutive effect of share-based awards, treasury method (2)		420,717		—

Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding		14,028,715		13,597,330

Net income (loss) for the period	$	3,893	$	(3,883	)
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest, net of tax		230		774

Net income (loss) attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	$	3,663	$	(4,657	)

Basic profit (loss) per share	$	0.27	$	(0.34	)
Diluted profit (loss) per share	$	0.26	$	(0.34	)

(1)

As part of the consideration for the 2008 acquisition of certain businesses from CIBC World Markets Corp., the Company issued a warrant to CIBC to purchase 1 million shares of Class A Stock of the Company at $48.62 per share exercisable five years from the January 14, 2008 acquisition date. The warrants expire on April 13, 2013. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the effect of the warrants is anti-dilutive.

(2)

For the three months ended March 31, 2013, the diluted earnings per share computation does not include the anti-dilutive effect of 1,057,573 shares of Class A Stock granted under share-based compensation arrangements together with the warrant described in (1) above (1,058,048 shares for the three months ended March 31, 2012).

4. Receivable from and Payable to Brokers and Clearing Organizations


	March 31,		December 31,
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	2013		2012
Receivable from brokers and clearing organizations consist of:
Deposits paid for securities borrowed	$	186,361	$	365,642
Receivable from brokers		45,507		41,091
Securities failed to deliver		30,191		10,031
Clearing organizations		—		399
Omnibus accounts		28,358		28,212
Other		538		34,324

	$	290,955	$	479,699

Payable to brokers and clearing organiations consist of:
Deposits received for securities loaned	$	175,601	$	190,387
Securities failed to receive		32,061		11,315
Clearing organizations and other		7,950		2,516

	$	215,612	$	204,218

5. Financial instruments

Securities owned and securities sold but not yet purchased, investments and derivative contracts are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings each period. The Company’s other financial instruments are generally short-term in nature or have variable interest rates and as such their carrying values approximate fair value, with the exception of notes receivable from employees which are carried at cost.

Securities Owned and Securities Sold, But Not Yet Purchased at Fair Value


	March 31, 2013				December 31, 2012
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Owned		Sold		Owned		Sold
U.S. Government, agency & sovereign obligations	$	612,310	$	12,320	$	525,255	$	131,930
Corporate debt and other obligations		20,577		6,811		14,428		1,858
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities		3,385		25		2,920		18
Municipal obligations		61,551		556		59,010		467
Convertible bonds		43,871		8,819		49,130		8,868
Corporate equities		42,091		34,401		43,708		29,884
Other		64,544		114		65,291		425

Total	$	848,329	$	63,046	$	759,742	$	173,450

Securities owned and securities sold, but not yet purchased, consist of trading and investment securities at fair values. Included in securities owned at March 31, 2013 are corporate equities with estimated fair values of approximately $13.3 million ($14.0 million at December 31, 2012), which are related to deferred compensation liabilities to certain employees included in accrued compensation on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of March 31, 2013, the Company did not have any exposure to European sovereign debt.

Valuation Techniques

A description of the valuation techniques applied and inputs used in measuring the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments is as follows:

U.S. Treasury Obligations

U.S. Treasury securities are valued using quoted market prices obtained from active market makers and inter-dealer brokers and, accordingly, are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

U.S. Agency Obligations

U.S. agency securities consist of agency issued debt securities and mortgage pass-through securities. Non-callable agency issued debt securities are generally valued using quoted market prices. Callable agency issued debt securities are valued by benchmarking model-derived prices to quoted market prices and trade data for identical or comparable securities. The fair value of mortgage pass-through securities are model driven with respect to spreads of the comparable To-be-announced (“TBA”) security. Actively traded non-callable agency issued debt securities are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Callable agency issued debt securities and mortgage pass-through securities are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Sovereign Obligations

The fair value of sovereign obligations is determined based on quoted market prices when available or a valuation model that generally utilizes interest rate yield curves and credit spreads as inputs. Sovereign obligations are categorized in Level 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Corporate Debt and Other Obligations

The fair value of corporate bonds is estimated using recent transactions, broker quotations and bond spread information. Corporate bonds are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Mortgage and Other Asset-Backed Securities

The Company holds non-agency securities collateralized by home equity and various other types of collateral which are valued based on external pricing and spread data provided by independent pricing services and are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. When specific external pricing is not observable, the valuation is based on yields and spreads for comparable bonds and, consequently, the positions are categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Municipal Obligations

The fair value of municipal obligations is estimated using recently executed transactions, broker quotations, and bond spread information. These obligations are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; in instances where significant inputs are unobservable, they are categorized in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Convertible Bonds

The fair value of convertible bonds is estimated using recently executed transactions and dollar-neutral price quotations, where observable. When observable price quotations are not available, fair value is determined based on cash flow models using yield curves and bond spreads as key inputs. Convertible bonds are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; in instances where significant inputs are unobservable, they are categorized in Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Corporate Equities

Equity securities and options are generally valued based on quoted prices from the exchange or market where traded and categorized as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. To the extent quoted prices are not available, prices are generally derived using bid/ask spreads, and these securities are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Other

In February 2010, Oppenheimer finalized settlements with each of the New York Attorney General’s office (“NYAG”) and the Massachusetts Securities Division (“MSD” and, together with the NYAG, the “Regulators”) concluding investigations and administrative proceedings by the Regulators concerning Oppenheimer’s marketing and sale of Auction Rate Securities (“ARS”). Pursuant to those settlements and legal settlements, as of March 31, 2013, the Company purchased and holds approximately $78.2 million in ARS from its clients pursuant to several purchase offers and legal settlements. The Company’s purchases of ARS from its clients will, subject to the terms and conditions of the settlements with the Regulators, continue on a periodic basis pursuant to the settlements with the Regulators. In addition, the Company is committed to purchase another $39.3 million in ARS from clients through 2016. The ultimate amount of ARS to be repurchased by the Company cannot be predicted with any certainty and will be impacted by redemptions by issuers and legal and other actions by clients during the relevant period, which cannot be predicted. The Company also held $150,000 in ARS in its proprietary trading account as of March 31, 2013 as a result of the failed auctions in February 2008. These ARS positions primarily represent Auction Rate Preferred Securities issued by closed-end funds and, to a lesser extent, Municipal Auction Rate Securities which are municipal bonds wrapped by municipal bond insurance and Student Loan Auction Rate Securities which are asset-backed securities backed by student loans.

Interest rates on ARS typically reset through periodic auctions. Due to the auction mechanism and generally liquid markets, ARS have historically been categorized as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Beginning in February 2008, uncertainties in the credit markets resulted in substantially all of the ARS market experiencing failed auctions. Once the auctions failed, the ARS could no longer be valued using observable prices set in the auctions. The Company has used less observable determinants of the fair value of ARS, including the strength in the underlying credits, announced issuer redemptions, completed issuer redemptions, and announcements from issuers regarding their intentions with respect to their outstanding ARS. The Company has also developed an internal methodology to discount for the lack of liquidity and non-performance risk of the failed auctions. Key inputs include spreads on comparable Treasury yields to derive a discount rate, an estimate of the ARS duration, and yields based on current auctions in comparable securities that have not failed. Additional information regarding the valuation technique and inputs used is as follows:

(expressed in thousands of dollars)

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2013

Product

Principal

Valuation
Adjustment

Fair Value

Valuation Technique

Unobservable
Input

Range

Auction Rate Securities⁽¹⁾

117,541

7,882

109,659

Discounted Cash Flow

Discount Rate

0.85% to 2.64%

Duration

5 to 8 Years

Current Yield⁽²⁾

0.20% to 1.33%

(1)	Includes ARS owned by the Company of $78.2 million included in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2013 as well as additional commitments to purchase ARS from clients of $39.3 million which is disclosed in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

(2)	Based on current auctions in comparable securities that have not failed.

The fair value of ARS is particularly sensitive to movements in interest rates. Increases in short-term interest rates would increase the discount rate input used in the ARS valuation and thus reduce the fair value of the ARS (increase the valuation adjustment). Conversely, decreases in short-term interest rates would decrease the discount rate and thus increase the fair value of ARS (decrease the valuation adjustment). However, an increase (decrease) in the discount rate input would be partially mitigated by an increase (decrease) in the current yield earned on the underlying ARS asset increasing the cash flows and thus the fair value. Furthermore, movements in short term interest rates would likely impact the ARS duration (i.e., sensitivity of the price to a change in interest rates), which would also have a mitigating affect on interest rate movements. For example, as interest rates increase, issuers of ARS have an incentive to redeem outstanding securities as servicing the interest payments gets prohibitively expensive which would lower the duration assumption thereby increasing the ARS fair value. Alternatively, ARS issuers are less likely to redeem ARS in a lower interest rate environment as it is a relatively inexpensive source of financing which would increase the duration assumption thereby decreasing the ARS fair value.

Due to the less observable nature of these inputs, the Company categorizes ARS in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had a valuation adjustment (unrealized loss) of $7.9 million for ARS.

Investments

In its role as general partner in certain hedge funds and private equity funds, the Company, through its subsidiaries, holds direct investments in such funds. The Company uses the net asset value of the underlying fund as a basis for estimating the fair value of its investment. Due to the illiquid nature of these investments and difficulties in obtaining observable inputs, these investments are included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following table provides information about the Company’s investments in Company-sponsored funds at March 31, 2013:


(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Fair Value		Unfunded Commitments		Redemption Frequency	Redemption Notice Period
Hedge funds (1)	$	623	$	—	Quarterly - Annually	30 - 120 Days
Private equity funds (2)		3,771		927	N/A	N/A
Distressed opportunities investment trust (3)		7,525		—	N/A	N/A

	$	11,919	$	927

(1)	Includes investments in hedge funds and hedge fund of funds that pursue long/short, event-driven, and activist strategies.

(2)	Includes private equity funds and private equity fund of funds with a focus on diversified portfolios, real estate and global natural resources.

(3)	Special purpose vehicle that holds the interest in securities formerly held by one of the Company’s funds which utilized Lehman Brothers International (Europe) as a prime broker.

Derivative Contracts

From time to time, the Company transacts in exchange-traded and over-the-counter derivative transactions to manage its interest rate risk. Exchange-traded derivatives, namely U.S. Treasury futures, Federal funds futures and Eurodollar futures, are valued based on quoted prices from the exchange and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Over-the-counter derivatives, namely interest rate swap and interest rate cap contracts, are valued using a discounted cash flow model and the Black-Scholes model, respectively, using observable interest rate inputs and are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

As described below in “Credit Concentrations”, the Company participates in loan syndications and operates as underwriting agent in leveraged financing transactions where it utilizes a warehouse facility provided by a commercial bank to extend financing commitments to third-party borrowers identified by the Company. The Company uses broker quotations on loans trading in the secondary market as a proxy to determine the fair value of the underlying loan commitment which is categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company also purchases and sells loans in its proprietary trading book. The Company uses broker quotations to determine the fair value of loan positions held which are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company from time to time enters into securities financing transactions that mature on the same date as the underlying collateral (referred to as “repo-to-maturity” transactions). Such transactions are treated as a sale of financial assets and a forward repurchase commitment, or conversely as a purchase of financial assets and a forward reverse repurchase commitment. The forward repurchase and reverse repurchase commitments are valued based on the spread between the market value of the government security and the underlying collateral and are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. As of March 31, 2013, the Company did not have any repo-to-maturity transactions.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company’s assets and liabilities, recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, have been categorized based upon the above fair value hierarchy as follows:

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2013


	Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2013
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Cash equivalents	$	50,909	$	—	$	—	$	50,909
Securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes		17,092		—		—		17,092
Deposits with clearing organizations		3,499		—		—		3,499
Securities owned
U.S Treasury securities		571,923		—		—		571,923
U.S. Agency securities		10,859		28,725		—		39,584
Sovereign obligations		—		803		—		803
Corporate debt and other obligations		2,574		18,003		—		20,577
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities		—		3,333		52		3,385
Municipal obligations		—		51,248		10,303		61,551
Convertible bonds		—		43,871		—		43,871
Corporate equities		30,333		11,758		—		42,091
Other		2,055		—		62,489		64,544

Securities owned, at fair value		617,744		157,741		72,844		848,329
Investments ⁽¹⁾		936		41,822		12,779		55,537
TBAs		—		3,111		—		3,111

Total	$	690,180	$	202,674	$	85,623	$	978,477

Liabilities
Securities sold, but not yet purchased
U.S Treasury securities	$	12,290	$	—	$	—	$	12,290
U.S. Agency securities		—		30		—		30
Corporate debt and other obligations		—		6,811		—		6,811
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities		—		25		—		25
Municipal obligations		—		556		—		556
Convertible bonds		—		8,819		—		8,819
Corporate equities		17,852		16,549		—		34,401
Other		14		—		100		114

Securities sold, but not yet purchased at fair value		30,156		32,790		100		63,046
Investments		270		—		—		270
Derivative contracts		360		71		2,094		2,525
TBAs		—		281		—		281

Total	$	30,786	$	33,142	$	2,194	$	66,122

(1)	Included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Cash equivalents	$	58,945	$	—	$	—	$	58,945
Securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes		11,499		—		—		11,499
Deposits with clearing organizations		9,095		—		—		9,095
Securities owned
U.S Treasury securities		497,546		—		—		497,546
U.S. Agency securities		—		27,690		—		27,690
Sovereign obligations		—		19		—		19
Corporate debt and other obligations		2,459		11,969		—		14,428
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities		—		2,880		40		2,920
Municipal obligations		—		49,616		9,394		59,010
Convertible bonds		—		49,130		—		49,130
Corporate equities		31,958		11,750		—		43,708
Other		2,328		—		62,963		65,291

Securities owned, at fair value		534,291		153,054		72,397		759,742
Investments ⁽¹⁾		10,477		37,088		12,954		60,519
TBAs		—		3,188		—		3,188

	$	624,307	$	193,330	$	85,351	$	902,988

Liabilities
Securities sold, but not yet purchased
U.S Treasury securities	$	131,899	$	—	$	—	$	131,899
U.S. Agency securities		—		31		—		31
Corporate debt and other obligations		—		1,858		—		1,858
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities		—		18		—		18
Municipal obligations		—		467		—		467
Convertible bonds		—		8,868		—		8,868
Corporate equities		20,946		8,938		—		29,884
Other		325		—		100		425

Securities sold, but not yet purchased at fair value		153,170		20,180		100		173,450
Investments		258		—		—		258
Derivative contracts		286		124		2,647		3,057
TBAs		—		175		—		175

	$	153,714	$	20,479	$	2,747	$	176,940

(1)	Included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

There were no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 assets and liabilities in the three months ended March 31, 2013.

The following tables present changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:


	Level 3 Assets and Liabilities
	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Beginning Balance		Total Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) ⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾			Purchases and Issuances		Sales and Settlements			Transfers In (Out)		Ending Balance
Assets
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities ⁽¹⁾	$	40	$	7		$	23	$	(18	)	$	—	$	52
Municipals		9,394		(141	)		1,200		(150	)		—		10,303
Other ⁽²⁾		62,963		(549	)		3,050		(2,975	)		—		62,489
Investments ⁽³⁾		12,954		329			—		(504	)		—		12,779
Liabilities
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities ⁽¹⁾		—		—			—		—			—		—
Other ⁽²⁾		100		—			—		—			—		100
Derivative contracts		2,647		553			—		—			—		2,094

(1)	Represents private placements of non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations.

(2)	Represents auction rate securities that failed in the auction rate market.

(3)	Primarily represents general partner ownership interests in hedge funds and private equity funds sponsored by the Company.

(4)	Included in principal transactions on the condensed consolidated statement of operations, except for investments which are included in other income on the condensed consolidated statement of operations.

(5)	Unrealized gains (losses) are attributable to assets or liabilities that are still held at the reporting date.


	Level 3 Assets and Liabilities
	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Beginning Balance		Total Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) ⁽⁴⁾⁽⁵⁾			Purchases and Issuances			Sales and Settlements			Transfers In (Out)		Ending Balance
Assets
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities ⁽¹⁾	$	16	$	17		$	80		$	(15	)	$	—	$	98
Municipals		3,562		(1,078	)		9,305			—			—		11,789
Other ⁽²⁾		65,001		(1,499	)		10,300			(6,971	)		—		66,831
Investments ⁽³⁾		12,482		515			124			—			11		13,132
Liabilities
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities ⁽¹⁾		—		—			—			—			—		—
Other ⁽²⁾		50		—			(50	)		—			—		—
Derivative contracts		2,347		—			1,560			—			—		3,907

(1)	Represents private placements of non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations.

(2)	Represents auction rate securities that failed in the auction rate market.

(3)	Primarily represents general partner ownership interests in hedge funds and private equity funds sponsored by the Company.

(4)	Included in principal transactions on the condensed consolidated statement of operations, except for investments which are included in other income on the condensed consolidated statement of operations.

(5)	Unrealized gains (losses) are attributable to assets or liabilities that are still held at the reporting date.

Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value

The table below presents the carrying value, fair value and fair value hierarchy category of certain financial instruments that are not measured at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The table below excludes non-financial assets and liabilities (e.g., fixed assets and accrued compensation).

The carrying value of financial instruments not measured at fair value categorized in the fair value hierarchy as Level 1 or Level 2 (e.g., cash and receivables from customers) approximates fair value because of the relatively short period of time between their origination and expected maturity. The fair value of the Senior Secured Note (“Notes”), categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, is based on quoted prices from the market in which the Notes trade.

The fair value of Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSRs”) is based on observable and unobservable inputs and thus categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of MSRs is based on a discounted cash flow valuation methodology on a loan level basis that determines the present value of future cash flows expected to be realized. The fair value considers estimated future servicing fees and ancillary revenue, offset by the estimated costs to service the loans. The discounted cash flow model considers portfolio characteristics, contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment speed assumptions, delinquency rates, costs to service, late charges, and other ancillary revenue, and other economic factors such as interest rates. The fair value of MSRs is sensitive to changes in interest rates, including the effect on prepayment speeds. MSRs typically decrease in value when interest rates decline as declining interest rates tend to increase prepayments and therefore reduce the expected life of the net servicing cash flows that make up the MSR asset.

Assets and liabilities not measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2013


					Fair Value Measurement: Assets
	As of March 31, 2013				As of March 31, 2013
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash	$	47,869	$	47,869	$	47,869	$	—	$	—	$	47,869
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes		20,072		20,072		20,072		—		—		20,072
Deposits with clearing organization		21,077		21,077		21,077		—		—		21,077
Receivable from brokers and clearing organizations
Deposits paid for securities borrowed		186,361		186,361		—		186,361		—		186,361
Receivables from brokers		45,507		45,507		—		45,507		—		45,507
Securities failed to deliver		30,191		30,191		—		30,191		—		30,191
Omnibus accounts		28,358		28,358		—		28,358		—		28,358
Other		538		538		—		538		—		538

		290,955		290,955		—		290,955		—		290,955
Receivable from customers		881,514		881,514		—		881,514		—		881,514
Notes receivable		45,030		45,030		—		—		45,030		45,030
Other assets
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)		27,187		34,350		—		—		34,350		34,350
Mortgage receivable ⁽¹⁾		25,685		25,685		—		25,685		—		25,685
Loan receivable ⁽²⁾		7,126		7,126		—		—		7,126		7,126
Escrow deposit ⁽³⁾		25,000		25,000		25,000		—		—		25,000

(1)	Mortgage receivable balance represents loan amounts outstanding after funding but prior to GNMA securitization. Amount funded by warehouse facility (warehouse payable) which is included in Accounts payable and other liabilities on condensed consolidated balance sheet (see note 4 below).

Residual amount between asset and liability is funded with internally generated funds.

(2)	Loan receivable represents outstanding loan purchased out of GNMA pool on property that is in default. Amount funded by third- party and is included in Accounts payable and other liabilities on condensed consolidated balance sheet (see note 5 below).

(3)	Represent escrow monies deposited with commercial bank. Offsets with payable to third party in Accounts payable and other liabilities on condensed consolidated balance sheet (see note 6 below).


					Fair Value Measurement: Liabilities
	As of March 31, 2013				As of March 31, 2013
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Drafts payable	$	44,927	$	44,927	$	44,927	$	—	$	—	$	44,927
Bank call loans		204,000		204,000		204,000		—		—		204,000
Payables to brokers and clearing organizations
Deposits received for securities loaned		175,601		175,601		—		175,601		—		175,601
Securities failed to receive		32,061		32,061		—		32,061		—		32,061
Clearing organizations and other		7,950		7,950		—		7,950		—		7,950

		215,612		215,612		—		215,612		—		215,612
Payables to customers		607,034		607,034		—		607,034		—		607,034
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		544,136		544,136		—		544,136		—		544,136
Accounts payable and other liabilities
Warehouse payable ⁽⁴⁾		24,374		24,374		—		24,374		—		24,374
Loan payable ⁽⁵⁾		7,126		7,126		—		—		7,126		7,126
Payable to third party ⁽⁶⁾		25,000		25,000		25,000		—		—		25,000
Senior secured note		195,000		209,742		—		209,742		—		209,742

(4)	Warehouse payable represents loans outstanding under warehouse facility, provided by commercial bank, prior to GNMA securitization. Used to fund Mortgage receivable in Other assets on condensed consolidated balance sheet (see note 1 above).

(5)	Loan payable represents amount funded by third-party for loan purchased out of GNMA pool on property that is in default. Offsets with Loan receivable in Other assets on condensed consolidated balance sheet (see note 2 above).

(6)	Offsets with Escrow deposit in Other assets on condensed consolidated balance sheet (see note 3 above).

Fair Value Option

The Company has the option to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings each period. The Company may make a fair value option election on an instrument-by-instrument basis at initial recognition of an asset or liability or upon an event that gives rise to a new basis of accounting for that instrument. The Company has elected to apply the fair value option to its loan trading portfolio which resides in OPY Credit Corp. and is included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Management has elected this treatment as it is consistent with the manner in which the business is managed as well as the way that financial instruments in other parts of the business are recorded. There were no loan positions held in the secondary loan trading portfolio at March 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

The Company also elected the fair value option for those securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“repurchase agreements”) and securities purchased under agreements to resell (“reverse repurchase agreements”) that do not settle overnight or have an open settlement date or that are not accounted for as purchase and sale agreements (such as repo-to-maturity transactions). The Company has elected the fair value option for these instruments to more accurately reflect market and economic events in its earnings and to mitigate a potential imbalance in earnings caused by using different measurement attributes (i.e. fair value versus carrying value) for certain assets and liabilities. At March 31, 2013, the fair value of the reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements were $nil and $nil, respectively.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

The Company transacts, on a limited basis, in exchange traded and over-the-counter derivatives for both asset and liability management as well as for trading and investment purposes. Risks managed using derivative instruments include interest rate risk and, to a lesser extent, foreign exchange risk. Interest rate swaps and interest rate caps are entered into to manage the Company’s interest rate risk associated with floating-rate borrowings. All derivative instruments are measured at fair value and are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The Company designates interest rate swaps and interest rate caps as cash flow hedges of floating-rate borrowings.

Cash flow hedges used for asset and liability management

For derivative instruments that were designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative was reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains or losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings.

On January 20, 2009, the Company entered into an interest rate cap contract, incorporating a series of purchased caplets with fixed maturity dates ending December 31, 2012, to hedge the interest payments associated with its floating rate Subordinated Note, which was subject to change due to changes in 3-Month LIBOR. With the repayment of the Subordinated Note in the second quarter of 2011, this cap was no longer designated as a cash flow hedge. The cap expired worthless on December 31, 2012. The Company recorded $19,200 in interest expense with respect to the interest rate cap for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Foreign exchange hedges

From time to time, the Company also utilizes forward and options contracts to hedge the foreign currency risk associated with compensation obligations to Oppenheimer Israel (OPCO) Ltd. employees denominated in New Israeli Shekels. Such hedges have not been designated as accounting hedges. At March 31, 2013, there were no forward or option contracts outstanding.

“To-be-announced” securities

The Company also transacts in pass-through mortgage-backed securities eligible to be sold in the “To-Be-Announced” or TBA market. TBAs provide for the forward or delayed delivery of the underlying instrument with settlement up to 180 days. The contractual or notional amounts related to these financial instruments reflect the volume of activity and do not reflect the amounts at risk. Unrealized gains and losses on TBAs are recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets in receivable from brokers and clearing organizations and payable to brokers and clearing organizations, respectively, and in the condensed consolidated statement of operations as principal transactions revenue.

The following table summarizes the notional and fair values of the TBAs as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


	March 31, 2013				December 31, 2012
	Notional				Notional
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Sale of TBAs ⁽¹⁾	$	345,168	$	3,111	$	449,065	$	3,188

Purchase of TBAs	$	44,749	$	281	$	117,573	$	175
Funding Commitments		264,035				304,390

	$	308,784			$	421,963

(1)

TBAs are used to offset exposures related to commitments to provide funding for Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) loans at OMHHF. At March 31, 2013, the loan commitments balance was $264.0 million ($304.4 million at December 31, 2012). In addition, at March 31, 2013, OMHHF had a loan receivable balance (included in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheet) of $25.7 million ($22.9 million at December 31, 2012) which relates to prior loan commitments that have been funded but have not yet been securitized. The “when issued” securitizations of these loans have been sold to market counter-parties.

Derivatives used for trading and investment purposes

Futures contracts represent commitments to purchase or sell securities or other commodities at a future date and at a specified price. Market risk exists with respect to these instruments. Notional or contractual amounts are used to express the volume of these transactions, and do not represent the amounts potentially subject to market risk. The futures contracts the Company used include U.S. Treasury notes, Federal Funds and Eurodollar contracts. At March 31, 2013, the Company had 388 open short contracts for 10-year U.S. Treasury notes with a fair value of $360,000 used primarily as an economic hedge of interest rate risk associated with a portfolio of fixed income investments. At March 31, 2013, the Company had 1,466 open contracts for Federal Funds futures with a fair value of approximately $71,000 used primarily as an economic hedge of interest rate risk associated with government trading activities.

From time-to-time, the Company enters into securities financing transactions that mature on the same date as the underlying collateral (referred to as “repo-to-maturity” transactions). These transactions are treated as a sale of financial assets and a forward repurchase commitment, or conversely as a purchase of financial assets and a forward reverse repurchase commitment. As of March 31, 2013, the Company did not have any repo-to-maturity transactions.

The notional amounts and fair values of the Company’s derivatives at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 by product were as follows:


	Fair Value of Derivative Instruments at March 31, 2013
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Description	Notional		Fair Value
Liabilities
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments ⁽¹⁾
Commodity contracts	U.S. Treasury Futures ⁽²⁾	$	57,600	$	360
	Federal Funds Futures ⁽²⁾		7,330,000		71
Other contracts	Auction rate securities purchase commitments ⁽³⁾		39,301		2,094

		$	7,426,901	$	2,525

(1)	See “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” above for description of derivative financial instruments.

(2)	Included in payable to brokers and clearing organizations on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

(3)	Included in other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.


	Fair Value of Derivative Instruments at December 31, 2012
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Description	Notional		Fair Value
Liabilities
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments ⁽¹⁾
Commodity contracts	U.S. Treasury Futures ⁽²⁾	$	56,000	$	286
	Federal Funds Futures ⁽²⁾		6,070,000		120
	Euro Dollars Futures ⁽²⁾		15,000		4
Other contracts	Auction rate securities purchase commitments ⁽³⁾		38,343		2,647

		$	6,179,343	$	3,057

(1)	See “Fair Value of Derivative Instruments” above for description of derivative financial instruments.

(2)	Included in payable to brokers and clearing organizations on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

(3)	Included in other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The following table presents the location and fair value amounts of the Company’s derivative instruments and their effect on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of

Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013

(expressed in thousands of dollars)

Recognized in Income on Derivatives (pre-tax)

Reclassified from
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income into Income
Effective Portion (1)
(after-tax)

Types

Description

Location

Gain (Loss)

Location

Gain (Loss)

Commodity contracts

U.S. Treasury Futures

Principal transaction revenue

(119

)

None

—

Federal Funds Futures

Principal transaction revenue

None

—

Other contracts

Auction rate securities purchase Commitment

Principal transaction revenue

1,794

None

—

1,730

—

(1)	There is no ineffective portion included in income for the period ended March 31, 2013.

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of

Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

(expressed in thousands of dollars)

Recognized in Income on Derivatives
(pre-tax)

Reclassified from
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income into Income
Effective Portion (1)
(after-tax)

Types

Description

Location

Gain (Loss)

Location

Gain (Loss)

Interest rate contracts

Caps (2)

Interest expense

(11

)

None

—

Commodity contracts

U.S. Treasury Futures

Principal transaction revenue

257

None

—

Federal Funds Futures

Principal transaction revenue

188

None

—

Other contracts

Auction rate securities purchase Commitment

Principal transaction revenue

(1,560

)

None

—

(1,126

)

—

(1)	There is no ineffective portion included in income for the period ended March 31, 2012.

(2)

As noted above in “Cash flow hedges used for asset and liability management”, interest rate caps are used to hedge interest rate risk associated with the Subordinated Note. With the repayment of the Subordinated Note in the second quarter of 2011, this cap is no longer designated as a cash flow hedge. The cap expired worthless on December 31, 2012.

Collateralized Transactions

The Company enters into collateralized borrowing and lending transactions in order to meet customers’ needs and earn residual interest rate spreads, obtain securities for settlement and finance trading inventory positions. Under these transactions, the Company either receives or provides collateral, including U.S. government and agency, asset-backed, corporate debt, equity, and non-U.S. government and agency securities.

The Company obtains short-term borrowings primarily through bank call loans. Bank call loans are generally payable on demand and bear interest at various rates but not exceeding the broker call rate. At March 31, 2013, bank call loans were $204.0 million ($128.3 million at December 31, 2012).

At March 31, 2013, the Company had collateralized loans, collateralized by firm and customer securities with market values of approximately $141.5 million and $278.2 million, respectively, with commercial banks. At March 31, 2013, the Company had approximately $1.2 billion of customer securities under customer margin loans that are available to be pledged, of which the Company has re-pledged approximately $154.6 million under securities loan agreements.

At March 31, 2013, the Company had deposited $336.2 million of customer securities directly with the Options Clearing Corporation to secure obligations and margin requirements under option contracts written by customers.

At March 31, 2013, the Company had no outstanding letters of credit.

The Company enters into reverse repurchase agreements, repurchase agreements, securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions to, among other things, acquire securities to cover short positions and settle other securities obligations, to accommodate customers’ needs and to finance the Company’s inventory positions. Except as described below, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, principally involving government and agency securities, are carried at amounts at which the securities subsequently will be resold or reacquired as specified in the respective agreements and include accrued interest. Repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are presented on a net-by-counterparty basis, when the repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are executed with the same counterparty, have the same explicit settlement date, are executed in accordance with a master netting arrangement, the securities underlying the repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements exist in “book entry” form and certain other requirements are met.

The following tables present the gross amounts and the offsetting amounts of reverse repurchase agreements, repurchase agreements, securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


As of March 31, 2013

	Gross		Gross Amounts Offset in the		Net Amounts of Assets		Gross Amounts Not Offset on the Balance Sheet
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Amounts of Recognized Assets		Statement of Financial Position		Presented on the Balance Sheet		Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount
Reverse repurchase agreements	$	3,862,697	$	3,862,697	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Securities borrowed ⁽¹⁾		186,361		—		186,361		(186,361	)		—		—

Total	$	4,049,058	$	3,862,697	$	186,361	$	(186,361)		$	—	$	—

(1)	Included in receivable from brokers and clearing organizations on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.


	Gross		Gross Amounts Offset in the		Net Amounts of Liabilities		Gross Amounts Not Offset on the Balance Sheet
	Amounts of Recognized Liabilities		Statement of Financial Position		Presented on the Balance Sheet		Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount
Repurchase agreements	$	4,406,833	$	3,862,697	$	544,136	$	(544,136	)	$	—	$	—
Securities loaned ⁽²⁾		175,601		—		175,601		(175,601	)		—		—

Total	$	4,582,434	$	3,862,697	$	719,737	$	(719,737	)	$	—	$	—

(2)	Included in payable to brokers and clearing organizations on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

As of December 31, 2012


	Gross		Gross Amounts Offset in the		Net Amounts of Assets		Gross Amounts Not Offset on the Balance Sheet
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Amounts of Recognized Assets		Statement of Financial Position		Presented on the Balance Sheet		Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount
Reverse repurchase agreements	$	1,160,239	$	1,160,239	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Securities borrowed ⁽¹⁾		365,642		—		365,642		(365,642	)		—		—

Total	$	1,525,881	$	1,160,239	$	365,642	$	(365,642)		$	—	$	—

(1)	Included in receivable from brokers and clearing organizations on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.


	Gross		Gross Amounts Offset in the		Net Amounts of Liabilities		Gross Amounts Not Offset on the Balance Sheet
	Amounts of Recognized Liabilities		Statement of Financial Position		Presented on the Balance Sheet		Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount
Repurchase agreements	$	1,552,630		1,160,239		392,391		(392,391	)		—	$	—
Securities loaned ⁽²⁾		190,387		—		190,387		(190,387	)		—		—

Total	$	1,743,017	$	1,160,239	$	582,778	$	(582,778	)	$	—	$	—

(2)	Included in payable to brokers and clearing organizations on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Certain of the Company’s repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements are carried at fair value as a result of the Company’s fair value option election. The Company elected the fair value option for those repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements that do not settle overnight or have an open settlement date or that are not accounted for as purchase and sale agreements (such as repo-to-maturity transactions described above). The Company has elected the fair value option for these instruments to more accurately reflect market and economic events in its earnings and to mitigate a potential imbalance in earnings caused by using different measurement attributes (i.e. fair value versus carrying value) for certain assets and liabilities. At March 31, 2013, the fair value of the reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements was $nil and $nil, respectively.

The Company receives collateral in connection with securities borrowed and reverse repurchase agreement transactions and customer margin loans. Under many agreements, the Company is permitted to sell or re-pledge the securities received (e.g., use the securities to enter into securities lending transactions, or deliver to counterparties to cover short positions). At March 31, 2013, the fair value of securities received as collateral under securities borrowed transactions and reverse repurchase agreements was $181.3 million ($354.0 million at December 31, 2012) and $3.9 billion ($1.2 billion at December 31, 2012), respectively, of which the Company has sold and re-pledged approximately $14.7 million ($14.3 million at December 31, 2012) under securities loaned transactions and $3.9 billion under repurchase agreements ($1.2 billion at December 31, 2012).

The Company pledges certain of its securities owned for securities lending and repurchase agreements and to collateralize bank call loan transactions. The carrying value of pledged securities owned that can be sold or re-pledged by the counterparty was $391.9 million, as presented on the face of the condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2013 ($570.0 million at December 31, 2012). The carrying value of securities owned by the Company that have been loaned or pledged to counterparties where those counterparties do not have the right to sell or re-pledge the collateral was $141.8 million at March 31, 2013 ($159.4 million at December 31, 2012).

The Company manages credit exposure arising from repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements by, in appropriate circumstances, entering into master netting agreements and collateral arrangements with counterparties that provide the Company, in the event of a customer default, the right to liquidate and the right to offset a counterparty’s rights and obligations. The Company also monitors the market value of collateral held and the market value of securities receivable from others. It is the Company’s policy to request and obtain additional collateral when exposure to loss exists. In the event the counterparty is unable to meet its contractual obligation to return the securities, the Company may be exposed to off-balance sheet risk of acquiring securities at prevailing market prices.

As of December 31, 2011, the interest in securities formerly held by one of the Company’s funds which utilized Lehman Brothers International (Europe) as a prime broker was transferred to an investment trust. As of March 31, 2013, the fair value of the Company’s investment in the securities held by Lehman Brothers International (Europe) that were segregated and not re-hypothecated was $7.5 million. This investment has been included in the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company.

Credit Concentrations

Credit concentrations may arise from trading, investing, underwriting and financing activities and may be impacted by changes in economic, industry or political factors. In the normal course of business, the Company may be exposed to risk in the event customers, counterparties including other brokers and dealers, issuers, banks, depositories or clearing organizations are unable to fulfill their contractual obligations. The Company seeks to mitigate these risks by actively monitoring exposures and obtaining collateral as deemed appropriate. Included in receivable from brokers and clearing organizations as of March 31, 2013 are receivables from three major U.S. broker-dealer totaling approximately $104.3 million.

Warehouse Facilities

Through OPY Credit Corp., the Company utilized a warehouse facility provided by CIBC to extend financing commitments to third party borrowers identified by the Company. This warehouse arrangement terminated on July 15, 2012. However, the Company will remain contingently liable for some minimal expenses in relation to this facility related to commitments made by CIBC to borrowers introduced by the Company until such borrowings are repaid by the borrower or until 2016, whichever is the sooner to occur. All such owed amounts will continue to be reflected in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations as incurred.

The Company reached an agreement with RBS Citizens, NA (“Citizens”) that was announced in July 2012, whereby the Company, through OPY Credit Corp., will introduce lending opportunities to Citizens, which Citizens can elect to accept and in which the Company will participate in the fees earned from any related commitment by Citizens. The Company can also in certain circumstances assume a portion of Citizen’s syndication and lending risk under such loans, and if it does so it shall be obligated to secure such obligations via a cash deposit determined through risk based formulas. Neither the Company nor Citizens is obligated to make any specific loan or to commit any minimum amount of lending capacity to the relationship. The agreement also calls for Citizens and the Company at their option to jointly participate in the arrangement of various loan syndications. At March 31, 2013, there were no loans in place.

The Company is obligated to settle transactions with brokers and other financial institutions even if its clients fail to meet their obligations to the Company. Clients are required to complete their transactions on settlement date, generally one to three business days after trade date. If clients do not fulfill their contractual obligations, the Company may incur losses. The Company has clearing/participating arrangements with the National Securities Clearing Corporation (“NSCC”), the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”), R.J. O’Brien & Associates (commodities transactions) and others. With respect to its business in reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements, substantially all open contracts at March 31, 2013 are with the FICC. In addition, the Company recently began clearing its non-U.S. international equities business carried on by Oppenheimer Europe Ltd. and Oppenheimer Investments Asia Ltd. through BNP Paribas Securities Services. The clearing corporations have the right to charge the Company for losses that result from a client’s failure to fulfill its contractual obligations. Accordingly, the Company has credit exposures with these clearing brokers. The clearing brokers can re-hypothecate the securities held on behalf of the Company. As the right to charge the Company has no maximum amount and applies to all trades executed through the clearing brokers, the Company believes there is no maximum amount assignable to this right. At March 31, 2013, the Company had recorded no liabilities with regard to this right. The Company’s policy is to monitor the credit standing of the clearing brokers and banks with which it conducts business.

OMHHF, which is engaged in mortgage brokerage and servicing, has obtained an uncommitted warehouse facility line through PNC Bank (“PNC”) under which OMHHF pledges Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”)—guaranteed mortgages for a period of up to 10 business days and PNC table funds the principal payment to the mortgagee. OMHHF repays PNC upon the securitization of the mortgage by the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) and the delivery of the security to the counter- party for payment pursuant to a contemporaneous sale on the date the mortgage is funded. At March 31, 2013, OMHHF had $2.8 million outstanding under the warehouse facility line at a variable interest rate of 1 month LIBOR plus 1.85%. Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $219,600 ($243,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012).

As discussed in Note 5, Financial Instruments, the Company enters into TBA transactions to offset exposures related to commitments to provide funding for FHA loans at OMHHF. In the normal course of business, the Company may be exposed to the risk that counterparties to these TBAs are unable to fulfill their contractual obligations.

Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”)

The Company’s policy is to consolidate all subsidiaries in which it has a controlling financial interest, as well as any VIEs where the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, when it has the power to make the decisions that most significantly affect the economic performance of the VIE and has the obligation to absorb significant losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company reviews factors, including the rights of the equity holders and obligations of equity holders to absorb losses or receive expected residual returns, to determine if the investment is a VIE. In evaluating whether the Company is the primary beneficiary, the Company evaluates its economic interests in the entity held either directly or indirectly by the Company. The consolidation analysis is generally performed qualitatively. This analysis, which requires judgment, is performed at each reporting date. Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-10, “Amendments for Certain Investment Funds,” defers the application of the revised consolidation rules for a reporting entity’s interest in an entity if certain conditions are met. An entity that qualifies for the deferral will continue to be assessed for consolidation under the overall guidance on VIEs, before its amendment, and other applicable consolidation guidance. Generally, the Company would consolidate those entities when it absorbs a majority of the expected losses or a majority of the expected residual returns, or both, of the entities.

For entities that the Company has concluded are not VIEs, the Company then evaluates whether the fund is a partnership or similar entity. If the fund is a partnership or similar entity, the Company evaluates the fund under the partnership consolidation guidance. Pursuant to that guidance, the Company consolidates funds in which it is the general partner and/or manages through a contract, unless presumption of control by the Company can be overcome. This presumption is overcome only when unrelated investors in the fund have the substantive ability to liquidate the fund or otherwise remove the Company as the general partner without cause, based on a simple majority vote of unaffiliated investors, or have other substantive participating rights. If the presumption of control can be overcome, the Company accounts for its interest in the fund pursuant to the equity method of accounting.

A subsidiary of the Company serves as general partner of hedge funds and private equity funds that were established for the purpose of providing investment alternatives to both its institutional and qualified retail clients. The Company holds variable interests in these funds as a result of its right to receive management and incentive fees. The Company’s investment in and additional capital commitments to these hedge funds and private equity funds are also considered variable interests. The Company’s additional capital commitments are subject to call at a later date and are limited in amount.

The Company assesses whether it is the primary beneficiary of the hedge funds and private equity funds in which it holds a variable interest in the context of the total general and limited partner interests held in these funds by all parties. In each instance, the Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary and therefore need not consolidate the hedge funds or private equity funds. The subsidiaries’ general partnership interests, additional capital commitments, and management fees receivable represent its maximum exposure to loss. The subsidiaries’ general partnership interests and management fees receivable are included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The following tables set forth the total VIE assets, the carrying value of the subsidiaries’ variable interests, and the Company’s maximum exposure to loss in Company-sponsored non-consolidated VIEs in which the Company holds variable interests and other non-consolidated VIEs in which the Company holds variable interests at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


	March 31, 2013
									Maximum
									Exposure
			Carrying Value of the						to Loss in
	Total		Company’s Variable Interest				Capital		Non-consolidated
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	VIE Assets (1)		Assets (2)		Liabilities		Commitments		VIEs
Hedge funds	$	1,879,864	$	320	$	—	$	—	$	320
Private equity funds		130,128		32		—		8		40

Total	$	2,009,992	$	352	$	—	$	8	$	360

(1)	Represents the total assets of the VIEs and does not represent the Company’s interests in the VIEs.

(2)	Represents the Company’s interests in the VIEs and is included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.


	December 31, 2012
									Maximum
									Exposure
			Carrying Value of the						to Loss in
	Total		Company’s Variable Interest				Capital		Non-consolidated
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	VIE Assets (1)		Assets (2)		Liabilities		Commitments		VIEs
Hedge funds	$	1,868,178	$	372	$	—	$	—	$	372
Private equity funds		171,169		32		—		8		40

Total	$	2,039,347	$	404	$	—	$	8	$	412

(1)	Represents the total assets of the VIEs and does not represent the Company’s interests in the VIEs.

(2)	Represents the Company’s interests in the VIEs and is included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

6. Commercial mortgage banking

OMHHF is engaged in the business of originating and servicing Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) insured multifamily and healthcare facility loans and securitizing these loans into Ginnie Mae (“GNMA”) mortgage backed securities. OMHHF also offers mortgage services to developers of commercial properties including apartments, elderly housing and nursing homes that satisfy FHA criteria. OMHHF maintains a mortgage servicing portfolio for which it provides a full array of services, including the collection of mortgage payments from mortgagees which are passed on to the mortgage holders, construction loan management and asset management.

The Company owns an 83.68% controlling interest in OMHHF. The 16.32% non-controlling interest belongs to one related third party who is the President of OMHHF.

Loan Origination Fees

OMHHF receives origination fees and incurs other direct origination costs when it originates mortgage loans. Due to the nature of its business and pre-selling loans to third parties, OMHHF recognizes origination fees and other direct origination costs at the time of the origination. As an inducement to have customers refinance, OMHHF absorbs the cost of customer’s prepayment penalties. Prepayment penalties are recorded as contra-revenue. The prepayment penalties were $3.0 million and $1.1 million for the period ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively.

Funding Commitments

OMHHF provides its clients with commitments to fund FHA-insured permanent or constructions loans. Upon providing these commitments to fund, OMHHF enters into TBA transactions directly, or indirectly through its affiliate, Oppenheimer, with counterparties to offset its exposures related to these funding commitments. See Note 5, Financial Instruments, for more information.

Mortgage Receivables

OMHHF advances funds from its own cash reserves in addition to obtaining financing through warehouse facilities in order to fund initial loan closing and subsequent construction loan draws. Prior to the GNMA securitization of a loan, a loan receivable is recorded in other assets with an equal and offsetting liability for the warehouse facility payable, which is recorded in other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Escrows Held in Trust

Custodial escrow accounts relating to loans serviced by OMHHF totaled $228.3 million at March 31, 2013 ($242.7 million at December 31, 2012). These amounts are not included on the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition as such amounts are not OMHHF’s assets. Certain cash deposits at financial institutions exceeded the FDIC insured limits. The combined uninsured balance with relation to escrow accounts at March 31, 2013 is approximately $122.4 million. OMHHF places these deposits with major financial institutions where they believe the risk is minimal, and that meet or exceed GNMA required credit ratings.

Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSR’s”)

OMHHF purchases or originates mortgage loans that are sold and securitized into GNMA mortgage backed securities. OMHHF retains the servicing responsibilities for the loans securitized and recognizes either a MSR asset or a MSR liability for that servicing contract. OMHHF receives annual servicing fees equal to a percentage of the outstanding principal balance of the loans being serviced.

OMHHF estimates the initial fair value of the servicing rights based on the present value of future net servicing income, adjusted for factors such as discount rate and prepayment. OMHHF uses the amortization method for subsequent measurement, subject to annual impairment. The fair value of the servicing rights on the loan portfolio was $34.4 million and $33.0 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively (carrying value of $27.2 million and $27.0 million at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively). The following tables summarize the changes in MSR’s for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012:


(expressed in thousands of dollars)
Balance, as of December 31, 2012	$	26,983
Originations ⁽¹⁾		1,540
Purchases		186
Disposals ⁽¹⁾		(882	)
Amortization expense		(640	)

Balance, as of March 31, 2013	$	27,187

(1)	Includes refinancing.


(expressed in thousands of dollars)
Balance, as of December 31, 2011	$	22,795
Originations ⁽¹⁾		1,299
Purchases		1,252
Disposals ⁽¹⁾		(448	)
Amortization expense		(672	)

Balance, as of March 31, 2012	$	24,226

(1)	Includes refinancing.

Servicing rights are amortized using the straight-line method over 10 years. Amortization expense for the next five years is as follows:


(expressed in thousands of dollars)
2013	$	3,309
2014		3,291
2015		3,291
2016		3,286
2017		3,259
Thereafter		10,751

	$	27,187

The Company receives fees during the course of servicing the mortgage loans. The amount of these fees for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:


	For the Three months ended March 31,
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	2013		2012
Servicing fees	$	1,208	$	927
Late fees		62		23
Ancillary fees		57		97

Total MSR fees	$	1,327	$	1,047

7. Long-term debt

(expressed in thousands of dollars)

Issued

Maturity Date

March 31, 2013

December 31, 2012

Senior Secured Notes

4/15/2018

$195,000

195,000

On April 12, 2011, the Company completed the private placement of $200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.75 percent Senior Secured Notes due April 15, 2018 at par (the “Notes”). The interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on April 15^th and October 15^th. Proceeds from the private placement were used to retire the Senior Secured Credit Note due 2013 ($22.4 million) and the Subordinated Note due 2014 ($100.0 million) and for other general corporate purposes. The private placement resulted in the fixing of the interest rate over the term of the Notes compared to the variable rate debt that was retired and an extension of the debt maturity dates as described above. The cost to issue the Notes was approximately $4.6 million which was capitalized in the second quarter of 2011 and is amortized over the period of the Notes.

The indenture for the Notes contains covenants which place restrictions on the incurrence of indebtedness, the payment of dividends, sale of assets, mergers and acquisitions and the granting of liens. The Notes provide for events of default including nonpayment, misrepresentation, breach of covenants and bankruptcy. The Company’s obligations under the Notes are guaranteed, subject to certain limitations, by the same subsidiaries that guaranteed the obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Note and the Subordinated Note which were retired. These guarantees may be shared, on a senior basis, under certain circumstances, with newly incurred debt outstanding in the future. At March 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all of its covenants.

On July 12, 2011, the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed to register the exchange of the Notes for fully registered Notes was declared effective by the SEC. The Exchange Offer was completed in its entirety on August 9, 2011.

In November 2011, the Company repurchased $5.0 million of its Notes at a cost of $4.7 million resulting in the recording of a gain of $300,000 during the fourth quarter of 2011. The Company continued to hold these Notes at March 31, 2013.

On April 4, 2012, the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed to enable the Company to act as a market maker in connection with the Notes was declared effective by the SEC.

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 on the Notes was $4.3 million ($4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012).

At March 31, 2013, the Notes were trading at $107.56 per $100.

8. Share capital

The Company’s authorized share capital consists of (a) 50,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share; (b) 50,000,000 shares of Class A non-voting common stock, par value $0.001 per share ; and (c) 99,680 shares of Class B voting common stock, par value $0.001 per share . No Preferred Stock has been issued. 99,680 shares of Class B Stock have been issued and are outstanding.

The Class A and the Class B Stock are equal in all respects except that the Class A Stock is non-voting.

The following table reflects changes in the number of shares of Class A Stock outstanding for the periods indicated:


	Three months ended March 31,
	2013		2012
Class A Stock outstanding, beginning of period		13,508,318		13,572,265
Issued pursuant to shared-based compensation plans		—		16,797
Repuchsed and cancelled pursuant to the stock buy-back		—		(99,900	)

Class A Stock outstanding, end of period		13,508,318		13,489,162

Stock buy-back

On October 7, 2011, the Company announced its intention to purchase up to 675,000 shares of its Class A Stock in compliance with the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC and the terms of its senior secured debt. The 675,000 shares represented approximately 5% of its then 13,572,265 issued and outstanding shares of Class A Stock. Any such purchases will be made by the Company in the open market at the prevailing open market price using cash on hand. All shares purchased will be cancelled. The repurchase program is expected to continue indefinitely. The repurchase program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any dollar amount or number of shares of Class A Stock. Depending on market conditions and other factors, these repurchases may be commenced or suspended from time to time without prior notice.

9. Contingencies

Many aspects of the Company’s business involve substantial risks of liability. In the normal course of business, the Company has been named as defendant or co-defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions, and other litigation, creating substantial exposure. Certain of the actual or threatened legal matters include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. These proceedings arise primarily from securities brokerage, asset management and investment banking activities. The Company is also involved, from time to time, in other reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental and self-regulatory agencies regarding the Company’s business which may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief. The investigations include, among other things, inquiries from the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and various state regulators. The Company is named as a respondent in a number of arbitrations by its current or former clients as well as lawsuits related to its sale of ARS.

The Company accrues for estimated loss contingencies related to legal and regulatory matters when available information indicates that it is probable a liability had been incurred at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the Company can reasonably estimate the amount of that loss. In many proceedings, however, it is inherently difficult to determine whether any loss is probable or even possible or to estimate the amount of any loss. In addition, even where loss is possible or an exposure to loss exists in excess of the liability already accrued with respect to a previously recognized loss contingency, it is often not possible to reasonably estimate the size of the possible loss or range of loss or additional losses or range of additional losses.

For certain legal and regulatory proceedings, the Company cannot reasonably estimate such losses, particularly for proceedings that are in their early stages of development or where plaintiffs seek substantial, indeterminate or special damages. Numerous issues may need to be reviewed, analyzed or resolved, including through potentially lengthy discovery and determination of important factual matters, and by addressing novel or unsettled legal questions relevant to the proceedings in question, before a loss or additional loss or range of loss or additional loss can be reasonably estimated for any proceeding. Even after lengthy review and analysis, the Company, in many legal and regulatory proceedings, may not be able to reasonably estimate possible losses or range of losses.

For certain other legal and regulatory proceedings, the Company can estimate possible losses, or, ranges of loss in excess of amounts accrued, but does not believe, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that such losses individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as a whole.

For legal proceedings where there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may be incurred, the Company estimates a range of aggregate loss in excess of amounts accrued of $0 to approximately $125.5 million. This estimated aggregate range is based upon currently available information for those legal proceedings in which the Company is involved, where an estimate for such losses can be made. For certain cases, the Company does not believe that an estimate can currently be made. The foregoing estimate is based on various factors, including the varying stages of the proceedings (including the fact that many are currently in preliminary stages), the numerous yet-unresolved issues in many of the proceedings and the attendant uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings. Accordingly, the Company’s estimate will change from time to time, and actual losses may be more than the current estimate.

10. Regulatory requirements

The Company’s U.S. broker dealer subsidiaries, Oppenheimer and Freedom, are subject to the uniform net capital requirements of the SEC under Rule 15c3-1 (the “Rule”) promulgated under Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Oppenheimer computes its net capital requirements under the alternative method provided for in the Rule which requires that Oppenheimer maintain net capital equal to two percent of aggregate customer-related debit items, as defined in SEC Rule 15c3-3. At March 31, 2013, the net capital of Oppenheimer as calculated under the Rule was $154.2 million or 12.4% of Oppenheimer’s aggregate debit items. This was $129.3 million in excess of the minimum required net capital at that date. Freedom computes its net capital requirement under the basic method provided for in the Rule, which requires that Freedom maintain net capital equal to the greater of $250,000 or 6-2/3% of aggregate indebtedness, as defined. At March 31, 2013, Freedom had net capital of $4.7 million, which was $4.4 million in excess of the $250,000 required to be maintained at that date.

At March 31, 2013, Oppenheimer and Freedom had $20.1 million and $16.1 million, respectively, in cash and U.S. Treasury securities segregated under Federal and other regulations.

At March 31, 2013, the regulatory capital of Oppenheimer Europe Ltd. was $5.7 million which was $2.3 million in excess of the $3.4 million required to be maintained at that date. Oppenheimer Europe Ltd. computes its regulatory capital pursuant to the Fixed Overhead Method prescribed by the Financial Services Authority of the United Kingdom.

At March 31, 2013, the regulatory capital of Oppenheimer Investments Asia Ltd. was $917,000, which was $531,000 in excess of the $386,000 required to be maintained on that date. Oppenheimer Investments Asia Ltd. computes its regulatory capital pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong.

In accordance with the SEC’s No-Action Letter dated November 3, 1998, the Company has computed a reserve requirement for the proprietary accounts of introducing firms as of March 31, 2013. The Company had no deposit requirements as of March 31, 2013.

11. Related party transactions

The Company does not make loans to its officers and directors except under normal commercial terms pursuant to client margin account agreements. These loans are fully collateralized by employee-owned securities.

12. Segment information

The Company has determined its reportable segments based on the Company’s method of internal reporting, which disaggregates its retail business by branch and its proprietary and investment banking businesses by product. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them based upon profitability.

Due to the recent growth in the Company’s commercial loan origination and servicing business operated out of OMHHF, the Company has broken out the results of this business in a reportable segment titled “Commercial Mortgage Banking.” This operating segment engages in business activities in which it earns revenues and incurs expenses that are distinct from the Company’s other reportable segments, its operating results are reviewed by the Company’s CEO who makes decisions about resources to be allocated to this business, and separate financial information is available for the legal entity from which it operates. The Commercial Mortgage Banking segment not only meets these qualitative criteria but, as a result of its recent growth, also meets one of the quantitative thresholds for segment reporting. Previously reported segment information has been revised to reflect this new operating segment.

The Company’s segments are:

Private Client—includes commission and fee income earned on client transactions, net interest earnings on client margin loans and cash balances, fees from money market funds, net contributions from stock loan activities and financing activities, and direct expenses associated with this segment;

Asset Management—includes fees from investment management services of Oppenheimer Asset Management Inc. and Oppenheimer’s asset management divisions employing various programs to professionally manage client assets either in individual accounts or in funds, and direct expenses associated with this segment;

Capital Markets—includes investment banking, institutional equities sales, trading, and research, taxable fixed income sales, trading, and research, public finance and municipal trading, as well as the Company’s operations in the United Kingdom, Hong Kong, and Israel, and direct expenses associated with this segment; and

Commercial Mortgage Banking—includes loan origination and servicing fees from the Company’s subsidiary, OMHHF. The Company has added this business segment due to the significant growth and profitability of this line of business over the last several quarters. In prior periods, this business had been part of the Capital Markets business segment.

The Company does not allocate costs associated with certain infrastructure support groups that are centrally managed to its operating segments. These areas include, but are not limited to, legal, compliance, operations, accounting, and internal audit. Costs associated with these groups are separately reported in a Corporate/Other category and include, for example, compensation and benefits, rent expense, information technology, legal and professional.

The table below presents information about the reported revenue and net income before taxes of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. Asset information by reportable segment is not reported, since the Company does not produce such information for internal use.


	Three months ended March 31,
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	2013			2012
Revenue
Private client division	$	143,369		$	144,263
Asset management		20,956			19,044
Capital markets		65,131			69,329
Commercial mortgage banking		8,066			8,054
Corporate/Other		1,624			(2,476	)

Total	$	239,146		$	238,214

Income (loss) before income taxes
Private client division	$	17,327		$	14,962
Asset management		6,543			4,990
Capital markets		3,533			(1,655	)
Commercial mortgage banking		2,878			3,830
Corporate/Other		(23,568	)		(28,616	)

Total	$	6,713		$	(6,489	)

Revenue, classified by the major geographic areas in which it was earned for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, was as follows:


	Three months ended March 31,
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	2013		2012
United States	$	228,693	$	225,635
Europe/Middle East		8,403		9,913
Asia		825		190
South America		1,225		2,476

Total	$	239,146	$	238,214

13. Subsequent events

On April 25, 2013, the Company announced a quarterly dividend in the amount of $0.11 per share, payable on May 24, 2013 to holders of Class A non-voting and Class B voting common stock of record on May 10, 2013.

14. Supplemental guarantor condensed consolidated financial statements

The Company’s Notes (see Note 7) are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by E.A. Viner International Co. and Viner Finance Inc. (together, the “Guarantors”), unless released as described below. Each of the Guarantors is 100% owned by the Company. The following consolidating financial statements present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company (referred to as “Parent” for purposes of this note only), the Guarantor subsidiaries, the Non-Guarantor subsidiaries and elimination entries necessary to consolidate the Company. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for using the equity method for purposes of the consolidated presentation.

Each Guarantor will be automatically and unconditionally released and discharged upon: the sale, exchange or transfer of the capital stock of a Guarantor and the Guarantor ceases to be a direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company if such sale does not constitute an asset sale under the indenture for the Notes or does not constitute an asset sale effected in compliance with the asset sale and merger covenants of the debenture for the Notes; a Guarantor being dissolved or liquidated; a Guarantor being designated unrestricted in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Notes; or the exercise by the Company of its legal defeasance option or covenant defeasance option or the discharge of the Company’s obligations under the indenture for the Notes in accordance with the terms of such indenture.

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

AS OF MARCH 31, 2013


(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Parent		Guarantor subsidiaries			Non-guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	40	$	31,394		$	67,344		$	—		$	98,778
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes		—		—			37,164			—			37,164
Deposits with clearing organizations		—		—			24,576			—			24,576
Receivable from brokers and clearing organizations		—		—			290,955			—			290,955
Receivable from customers, net of allowance for credit losses of $2,239		—		—			881,514			—			881,514
Income tax receivable		15,094		31,100			(684	)		(31,530	)		13,980
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		—		—			—			—			—
Securities owned, including amounts pledged of $391,900, at fair value		—		2,574			845,755			—			848,329
Subordinated loan receivable		—		112,558			—			(112,558	)		—
Notes receivable, net		—		—			45,030			—			45,030
Office facilities, net		—		17,626			13,312			—			30,938
Deferred tax assets, net		—		309			36,595			(35,124	)		1,780
Intangible assets, net		—		—			31,700			—			31,700
Goodwill		—		—			137,889			—			137,889
Other		3,332		25,276			157,926			—			186,534
Investment in subsidiaries		514,028		875,266			(182,562	)		(1,206,732	)		—
Intercompany receivables		177,650		(70,560	)		(41,213	)		(65,877	)		—

	$	710,144	$	1,025,543		$	2,345,301		$	(1,451,821	)	$	2,629,167

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Drafts payable	$	—	$	—		$	44,927		$	—		$	44,927
Bank call loans		—		—			204,000			—			204,000
Payable to brokers and clearing organizations		—		—			215,612			—			215,612
Payable to customers		—		—			607,034			—			607,034
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		—		—			544,136			—			544,136
Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value		—		—			63,046			—			63,046
Accrued compensation		—		—			97,887			—			97,887
Accounts payable and other liabilities		8,287		60,255			80,567			(492	)		148,617
Income tax payable		2,440		22,189			5,296			(29,925	)		—
Senior secured notes		195,000		—			—			—			195,000
Subordinated indebtedness		—		—			112,558			(112,558	)		—
Deferred tax liabilities, net		—		—			36,728			(36,728	)		—
Excess of fair value of acquired assets over cost		—		—			—			—			—
Intercompany payables		—		65,875			—			(65,875	)		—

		205,727		148,319			2,011,791			(245,578	)		2,120,259
Stockholders’ equity
Stockholders’ equity attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.		504,417		877,224			329,019			(1,206,243	)		504,417
Noncontrolling interest		—		—			4,491			—			4,491

		504,417		877,224			333,510			(1,206,243	)		508,908

	$	710,144	$	1,025,543		$	2,345,301		$	(1,451,821	)	$	2,629,167

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2012


(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Parent			Guarantor subsidiaries			Non-guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	35		$	40,658		$	94,673		$	—		$	135,366
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes		—			—			33,000			—			33,000
Deposits with clearing organizations		—			—			25,954			—			25,954
Receivable from brokers and clearing organizations		—			—			479,699			—			479,699
Receivable from customers, net of allowance for credit losses of $2,256		—			—			817,941			—			817,941
Income tax receivable		13,207			30,568			(450	)		(42,874	)		451
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		—			—			—			—			—
Securities owned, including amounts pledged of $569,995, at fair value		—			2,459			757,283			—			759,742
Subordinated loan receivable		—			112,558			—			(112,558	)		—
Notes receivable, net		—			—			47,324			—			47,324
Office facilities, net		—			15,547			12,785			—			28,332
Deferred tax assets, net		(143	)		309			52,350			(36,176	)		16,340
Intangible assets, net		—			—			31,700			—			31,700
Goodwill		—			—			137,889			—			137,889
Other		3,418			1,437			159,427			—			164,282
Investment in subsidiaries		506,679			880,609			(195,045	)		(1,192,243	)		—
Intercompany receivables		178,743			(114,449	)		(27,686	)		(36,608	)		—

	$	701,939		$	969,696		$	2,426,844		$	(1,420,459	)	$	2,678,020

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Drafts payable	$	—		$	—		$	56,586		$	—		$	56,586
Bank call loans		—			—			128,300			—			128,300
Payable to brokers and clearing organizations		—			—			204,218			—			204,218
Payable to customers		—			—			692,378			—			692,378
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		—			—			392,391			—			392,391
Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value		—			—			173,450			—			173,450
Accrued compensation		—			—			150,434			—			150,434
Accounts payable and other liabilities		3,759			43,350			133,646			(493	)		180,262
Income tax payable		2,440			22,189			18,687			(43,316	)		—
Senior secured notes		195,000			—			—			—			195,000
Subordinated indebtedness		—			—			112,558			(112,558	)		—
Deferred tax liabilities, net		—			(943	)		36,677			(35,734	)		—
Excess of fair value of acquired assets over cost		—			—			—			—			—
Intercompany payables		—			36,605			—			(36,605	)		—

		201,199			101,201			2,099,325			(228,706	)		2,173,019
Stockholders’ equity
Stockholders’ equity attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.		500,740			868,495			323,258			(1,191,753	)		500,740
Noncontrolling interest		—			—			4,261			—			4,261

		500,740			868,495			327,519			(1,191,753	)		505,001

	$	701,939		$	969,696		$	2,426,844		$	(1,420,459	)	$	2,678,020

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013


(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Parent			Guarantor subsidiaries		Non-guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
REVENUES
Commissions	$	—		$	—	$	119,580	$	—		$	119,580
Principal transactions, net		—			73		15,644		—			15,717
Interest		5			2,788		12,296		(2,718	)		12,371
Investment banking		—			—		18,448		—			18,448
Advisory fees		—			—		57,360		(640	)		56,720
Other		—			42		16,310		(42	)		16,310

		5			2,903		239,638		(3,400	)		239,146

EXPENSES
Compensation and related expenses		441			—		158,768		—			159,209
Clearing and exchange fees		—			—		6,042		—			6,042
Communications and technology		23			—		15,841		—			15,864
Occupancy and equipment costs		—			—		17,607		(42	)		17,565
Interest		4,375			—		5,205		(2,718	)		6,862
Other		437			3		27,091		(640	)		26,891

		5,276			3		230,554		(3,400	)		232,433

Income (loss) before income taxes		(5,271	)		2,900		9,084		—			6,713
Income tax provision (benefit)		(2,032	)		679		4,173		—			2,820

Net income (loss) for the period		(3,239	)		2,221		4,911		—			3,893
Less net income attributable to non- controlling interest, net of tax		—			—		230		—			230
Equity in subsidiaries		6,902			—		—		(6,902	)		—

Net income (loss) attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	$	3,663		$	2,221	$	4,681	$	(6,902	)	$	3,663

Comprehensive income	$	—		$	—	$	451	$	—		$	451

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012


(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Parent			Guarantor subsidiaries			Non-guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
REVENUES
Commissions	$	—		$	—		$	125,634		$	—		$	125,634
Principal transactions, net		—			488			12,067			—			12,555
Interest		—			3,097			12,996			(2,700	)		13,393
Investment banking		—			—			20,087			—			20,087
Advisory fees		—			—			50,714			(637	)		50,077
Other		—			—			16,468			—			16,468

		—			3,585			237,966			(3,337	)		238,214

EXPENSES
Compensation and related expenses		128			—			158,523			—			158,651
Clearing and exchange fees		—			—			6,031			—			6,031
Communications and technology		—			—			16,138			—			16,138
Occupancy and equipment costs		—			(42	)		24,386			—			24,344
Interest		4,374			66			7,052			(2,700	)		8,792
Other		343			18			31,023			(637	)		30,747

		4,845			42			243,153			(3,337	)		244,703

Income (loss) before income taxes		(4,845	)		3,543			(5,187	)		—			(6,489	)
Income tax provision (benefit)		(1,832	)		1,233			(2,007	)		—			(2,606	)

Net income (loss) for the period		(3,013	)		2,310			(3,180	)		—			(3,883	)
Less net income attributable to non- controlling interest, net of tax		—			—			774			—			774
Equity in subsidiaries		(1,644	)		—			—			1,644			—

Net income (loss) attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	$	(4,657	)	$	2,310		$	(3,954	)	$	1,644		$	(4,657	)

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	2		$	—		$	(368	)	$	—		$	(366	)

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013


(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Parent			Guarantor subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations		Consolidated
Cash flows from operations:
Net income (loss) for the period	$	(3,239	)	$	2,221		$	4,911		$	—	$	3,893
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		—			—			2,514			—		2,514
Deferred income tax		—			—			14,560			—		14,560
Amortization of notes receivable		—			—			4,739			—		4,739
Amortization of debt issuance costs		160			—			—			—		160
Provision for credit losses		—			—			(17	)		—		(17	)
Share-based compensation expense		—			—			1,879			—		1,879
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		4,581			(11,485	)		(126,495	)		—		(133,399	)

Cash provided by (used in) continuing operations		1,502			(9,264	)		(97,909	)		—		(105,671	)

Cash flows from Investment activities
Purchase of office facilities		—			—			(5,120	)		—		(5,120	)

Cash used in investing activities		—			—			(5,120	)		—		(5,120	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Cash dividends paid on Class A non-voting and Class B voting common stock		(1,497	)		—			—			—		(1,497	)
Other financing activities		—			—			75,700			—		75,700

Cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities		(1,497	)		—			75,700			—		74,203

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		5			(9,264	)		(27,329	)		—		(36,588	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period		35			40,658			94,673			—		135,366

Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period	$	40		$	31,394		$	67,344		$	—	$	98,778

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012


(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Parent			Guarantor subsidiaries		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations		Consolidated
Cash flows from operations:
Net income (loss) for the period	$	(3,013	)	$	2,310	$	(3,180	)	$	—	$	(3,883	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		—			—		2,845			—		2,845
Deferred income tax		—			—		(6,666	)		—		(6,666	)
Amortization of notes receivable		—			—		4,870			—		4,870
Amortization of debt issuance costs		—			—		99			—		99
Amortization of intangible assets		—			—		3,212			—		3,212
Provision for credit losses		—			—		178			—		178
Share-based compensation expense		—			—		1,259			—		1,259
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		4,130			18,008		(64,955	)		—		(42,817	)

Cash provided by (used in) continuing operations		1,117			20,318		(62,338	)		—		(40,903	)

Cash flows from Investment activities
Purchase of office facilities		—			—		(4,711	)		—		(4,711	)

Cash used in investing activities		—			—		(4,711	)		—		(4,711	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Cash dividends paid on Class A non-voting and Class B voting common stock		(1,495	)		—		—			—		(1,495	)
Repurchase of Class A non-voting common stock		(1,551	)		—		—			—		(1,551	)
Other financing activities		41			—		65,100			—		65,141

Cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities		(3,005	)		—		65,100			—		62,095

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(1,888	)		20,318		(1,949	)		—		16,481
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period		2,555			11,882		55,892			—		70,329

Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period	$	667		$	32,200	$	53,943		$	—	$	86,810

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Reference is also made to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto found in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The Company engages in a broad range of activities in the securities industry, including retail securities brokerage, institutional sales and trading, investment banking (both corporate and public finance), research, market-making, trust services and investment advisory and asset management services. Its principal subsidiaries are Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. (“Oppenheimer”) and Oppenheimer Asset Management (“OAM”). As at March 31, 2013, the Company provided its services from 94 offices in 26 states located throughout the United States, offices in Tel Aviv, Israel, Hong Kong and Beijing, China, and London, England, St. Heleier, Isle of Jersey and two offices in Latin America, and through registration as an exempt international dealer in certain provinces in Canada. Client assets entrusted to the Company as at March 31, 2013 totaled approximately $84.9 billion. The Company provides investment advisory services through OAM and OIM and Oppenheimer’s Fahnestock Asset Management, Alpha and OMEGA Group divisions. The Company provides trust services and products through Oppenheimer Trust Company. The Company provides discount brokerage services through Freedom Investments, Inc. (“Freedom”) and through BUYandHOLD, a division of Freedom. Through OPY Credit Corp., the Company offers syndication as well as trading of issued corporate loans. Oppenheimer Multifamily Housing & Healthcare Finance, Inc. (“OMHHF”) is engaged in mortgage brokerage and servicing. At March 31, 2013, client assets under management by the asset management groups totaled approximately $22.4 billion. At March 31, 2013, the Company employed 3,498 employees (3,428 full time and 70 part time), of whom approximately 1,405 were financial advisers.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The Company’s accounting policies are essential to understanding and interpreting the financial results reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements. The significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements are summarized in note 1 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto found in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Certain of those policies are considered to be particularly important to the presentation of the Company’s financial results because they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, often as a result of matters that are inherently uncertain. The following is a discussion of these policies.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, there were no material changes to matters discussed under the heading “Critical Accounting Estimates” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Business Environment

The securities industry is directly affected by general economic and market conditions, including fluctuations in volume and price levels of securities and changes in interest rates, inflation, political events, investor participation levels, legal and regulatory, accounting, tax and compliance requirements and competition, all of which have an impact on commissions, firm trading, fees from accounts under investment management as well as fees for investment banking services, and investment income as well as on liquidity. Substantial fluctuations can occur in revenue and net income due to these and other factors.

Against a backdrop of continuing economic and credit problems across Europe, budgetary and “fiscal cliff” issues in the United States and a weakening Japanese yen, the domestic economy continued to grow in fits and starts propelled by continued accommodative policies by the Federal Reserve. Record low interest rates and purchases of record amounts of government and agency securities through the Federal Reserve’s QE-3 policy provided the liquidity to drive the stock market to record levels and to continue to provide the underpinnings for a recovery in housing prices across the U.S. While equity prices moved higher during the recent quarter, it was on decidedly less volume than in the comparable period of 2012.

For a number of years, the Company has offered auction rate securities (“ARS”) to its clients. A significant portion of the market in ARS has ‘failed’ because, in the tight credit market, the dealers are no longer willing or able to purchase the imbalance between supply and demand for ARS. These securities have auctions scheduled on either a 7, 28 or 35 day cycle. Clients of the Company own a significant amount of ARS in their individual accounts. The absence of a liquid market for these securities presents a significant problem to clients and, as a result, to the Company. It should be noted that this is a failure of liquidity and not a default. These securities in almost all cases have not failed to pay interest or principal when due. These securities are fully collateralized for the most part and, for the most part, remain good credits. The Company has not acted as an auction agent for ARS.

Interest rates on ARS typically reset through periodic auctions. Due to the auction mechanism and generally liquid markets, ARS have historically been categorized as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Beginning in February 2008, uncertainties in the credit markets resulted in substantially all of the ARS market experiencing failed auctions. Once the auctions failed, the ARS could no longer be valued using observable prices set in the auctions. The Company has used less observable determinants of the fair value of ARS, including the strength in the underlying credits, announced issuer redemptions, completed issuer redemptions, and announcements from issuers regarding their intentions with respect to their outstanding ARS. The Company has also developed an internal methodology to discount for the lack of liquidity and non-performance risk of the failed auctions. Key inputs include spreads on comparable Treasury yields to derive a discount rate, an estimate of the ARS duration, and yields based on current auctions in comparable securities that have not failed. Due to the less observable nature of these inputs, the Company categorizes ARS in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had a valuation adjustment (unrealized loss) of $7.9 million for ARS.

The Company has sought, with limited success, financing from a number of sources to try to find a means for all its clients to find liquidity from their ARS holdings and will continue to do so. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in finding a liquidity solution for all its clients’ ARS. See “Risk Factors – The Company may continue to be adversely affected by the failure of the Auction Rate Securities Market” appearing in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and “Factors Affecting ‘Forward-Looking Statements’”.

Recent events have caused increased review and scrutiny of the methods utilized by financial service companies to finance their short term requirements for liquidity. The Company utilizes commercial bank loans, securities lending, and repurchase agreements (through overnight and term) to finance its short term liquidity needs (See “Liquidity”). All repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements are collateralized by short term U.S. Government obligations and U.S. Government Agency obligations.

The Company is focused on growing its private client and asset management businesses through strategic additions of experienced financial advisers in its existing branch system and employment of experienced money management personnel in its asset management business. In addition, the Company is committed to the improvement of its technology capability to support client service and the expansion of its capital markets capabilities while addressing the issue of managing its expenses to better align them with the current investment environment. The Company will continue to nurture the growth of OMHHF as well as its business in non-U.S. markets.

Regulatory and Legal Environment

The brokerage business is subject to regulation by, among others, the SEC and FINRA (formerly the NYSE and NASD) in the United States, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) in the United Kingdom, the Jersey Financial Services Commission (“JFSC”), in the Isle of Jersey, the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong (“SFC”), certain provincial securities regulators in Canada, and various state securities regulators in the United States. Events of a decade ago surrounding corporate accounting and other activities leading to investor losses resulted in the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and have caused increased regulation of public companies. The financial crisis of 2008-9 accelerated this trend. New regulations and new interpretations and enforcement of existing regulations are creating increased costs of compliance and increased investment in systems and procedures to comply with these more complex and onerous requirements. Increasingly, the various states are imposing their own regulations that make the uniformity of regulation a thing of the past, and make compliance more difficult and more expensive to monitor.

In July 2010, Congress enacted extensive legislation entitled the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd Frank”) in which it mandated that the SEC and other regulators conduct comprehensive studies and issue new regulations based on their findings to control the activities of financial institutions in order to protect the financial system, the investing public and consumers from issues and failures that occurred in the recent financial crisis. All relevant studies have not yet been completed, but they are widely expected to extensively impact the regulation and practices of financial institutions including the Company. The changes are likely to significantly reduce leverage available to financial institutions and to increase transparency to regulators and investors of risks taken by such institutions. It is impossible to presently predict the nature of such rulemaking. Rules adopted in the U.S. and Europe would create a new regulator for certain activities, regulate and/or prohibit proprietary trading for certain deposit taking institutions, control the amount and timing of compensation to “highly paid” employees, create new regulations around financial transactions with consumers requiring the adoption of a uniform fiduciary standard of care of broker-dealers and investment advisers providing personalized investment advice about securities to retail customers, and increase the disclosures provided to clients, and create a tax on securities transactions. In December 2012, France began applying a 0.2% transaction tax on financial transactions in American Depository Receipts of French companies that trade on U.S. exchanges. Italy implemented its own financial transaction tax in March 2013. The imposition of financial transaction taxes are likely to impact the jurisdiction in which securities are traded and the “spreads” demanded by market participants in order to make up for the cost of any such tax. It appears increasingly likely that such a tax will be implemented throughout the European Union. If and when enacted, such regulations will likely increase compliance costs and reduce returns earned by financial service providers and intensify compliance overall. It is difficult to predict the nature of the final regulations and their impact on the business of the Company.

Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships with, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds (the “Volcker Rule”) was published by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board as required by Dodd-Frank in 2011. The Volcker Rule is intended to restrict U.S. banks and other financial institutions that accept deposits from conducting proprietary trading activities, as well as investing in hedge funds and private equity funds for their own account. The intent of the Volcker Rule is to reduce risk to the capital of such institutions through reducing speculation and risk-taking with bank capital. The draft form of the proposed rule was exposed for comment until January 13, 2012 and is scheduled to become effective on July 21, 2014. It seems likely that additional comments will be permitted surrounding the impact of the Volcker Rule on market liquidity and importantly on the liquidity of issued sovereign debt in Europe and Asia. While it is widely expected that the impact of the Volcker Rule may significantly impact the liquidity in various capital markets, the effect cannot be predicted with any certainty. The Company believes that the Volcker Rule will not directly affect its operations, but indirect effects cannot be predicted with any certainty. Additionally, the Federal Reserve in conjunction with other U.S regulatory organizations has analyzed the U.S. financial system and the impact that might result from the failure of one or more “Strategically Important Financial Institutions” (“SIFI”). To date, less than 25 such institutions have been identified and will be made subject to special regulations including the requirement to create a plan for their orderly demise in the event of a failure. The identification process has not been completed and is subject to appeal by the affected institutions. The Company has no reason to believe that it will be identified as a SIFI. Recent revelations concerning the potential manipulation of the LIBOR (“London Interbank Offered Rate”) during the period from 2008-2010 make it likely that more regulation surrounding the fixing of interest rates on commercial bank loans and reference rates on derivatives is likely.

The impact of the rules and requirements that were created by the passage of the Patriot Act, and the anti-money laundering regulations (AML) in the U.S. and similar laws in other countries that are related thereto have created significant costs of compliance and can be expected to continue to do so.

Pursuant to FINRA Rule 3130 (formerly NASD Rule 3013 and NYSE Rule 342), the chief executive officers (“CEOs”) of regulated broker-dealers (including the CEO of Oppenheimer) are required to certify that their companies have processes in place to establish and test supervisory policies and procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance with federal securities laws and regulations, including applicable regulations of self-regulatory organizations. The CEO of the Company is required to make such a certification on an annual basis and did so in March 2013.

Other Regulatory Matters

For several quarters, Oppenheimer has been responding to information requests from the Enforcement Staff of FINRA regarding Oppenheimer’s policies and procedures in relation to, and the activities of several financial advisers concerning, the sale of low-priced securities. The Company has responded to numerous document requests and there has been on-the-record testimony given by financial advisers and supervisory personnel who work in several of Oppenheimer’s branch offices in connection with this inquiry.

On June 23, 2011, Oppenheimer received notice of an investigation by the SEC pursuant to which the SEC requested information from the Company regarding the sale of a number of low-priced securities effected primarily through one of Oppenheimer’s financial advisers. Oppenheimer is continuing to respond to information requests as part of the investigation.

Oppenheimer is continuing to cooperate with the investigating entities and will continue to closely monitor the activities of its financial advisers and their supervisors in relation to the sale of low-priced securities.

In February 2010, Oppenheimer finalized settlements with each of the New York Attorney General’s office (“NYAG”) and the Massachusetts Securities Division (“MSD” and, together with the NYAG, the “Regulators”) concluding investigations and administrative proceedings by the Regulators concerning Oppenheimer’s marketing and sale of ARS. Pursuant to those settlements and legal settlements, as of March 31, 2013, the Company purchased and holds approximately $78.2 million in ARS from its clients pursuant to several purchase offers and legal settlements. The Company’s purchases of ARS from its clients will, subject to the terms and conditions of the settlements with the Regulators, continue on a periodic basis thereafter pursuant to the settlements with the Regulators. In addition, the Company is committed to purchase another $39.3 million in ARS from clients through 2016. The ultimate amount of ARS to be repurchased by the Company cannot be predicted with any certainty and will be impacted by redemptions by issuers and legal and other actions by clients during the relevant period, which cannot be predicted. The Company also held $150,000 in ARS in its proprietary trading account as of March 31, 2013 as a result of the failed auctions in February 2008. These ARS positions primarily represent Auction Rate Preferred Securities issued by closed-end funds and, to a lesser extent, Municipal Auction Rate Securities which are municipal bonds wrapped by municipal bond insurance and Student Loan Auction Rate Securities which are asset-backed securities backed by student loans.

The Company’s clients held at Oppenheimer approximately $205.5 million of ARS at March 31, 2013, exclusive of amounts that 1) were owned by Qualified Institutional Buyers (“QIBs”), 2) were transferred to the Company after February 2008, 3) were purchased by clients after February 2008, or 4) were transferred from the Company to other securities firms after February 2008. See “Risk Factors – The Company may continue to be adversely affected by the failure of the Auction Rate Securities Market” appearing in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and “Legal Proceedings” herein.

Other Matters

The Company operates in all state jurisdictions in the United States and is thus subject to regulation and enforcement under the laws and regulations of each of these jurisdictions. The Company has been and expects that it will continue to be subject to investigations and some or all of these may result in enforcement proceedings as a result of its business conducted in the various states.

As part of its ongoing business, the Company records reserves for legal expenses, judgments, fines and/or awards attributable to litigation and regulatory matters. In connection therewith, the Company has maintained its legal reserves at levels it believes will resolve outstanding matters, but may increase or decrease such reserves as matters warrant. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company establishes reserves for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. When loss contingencies are not both probable and reasonably estimable, the Company does not establish reserves. In some of the matters described under “Legal Proceedings”, loss contingencies are not probable and reasonably estimable in the view of management and, accordingly, reserves have not been established for those matters. See “Legal Proceedings” herein.

Business Continuity

The Company is committed to an on-going investment in its technology and communications infrastructure including extensive business continuity planning and investment. These costs are on-going and the Company believes that current and future costs will exceed historic levels due to business and regulatory requirements. This investment increased in 2008 and 2009 as a result of the January 2008 acquisition of certain businesses from CIBC and the Company’s need to build out its platform to accommodate these businesses. The Company made infrastructure investments for technology in 2010 when it built a new data center both to accommodate its existing and future business and to restructure its disaster recovery planning. The move to new headquarters has required additional outlays for this purpose although considerable savings have begun to be realized by the availability of independent electric generating capacity for the entire building which will support the Company’s infrastructure and occupancy.

The fourth quarter of 2012 was impacted by Superstorm Sandy which occurred on October 29^th causing the Company to vacate its two principal offices in downtown Manhattan and displaced 800 of the Company’s employees including substantially all of its capital markets, operations and headquarters staff for in excess of 30 days. During the displacement period the Company successfully implemented its business continuity plan by relocating personnel from both of its downtown Manhattan locations into other branch offices and back-up facilities in the region. Other than the closure of the financial markets for two business days, the Company was able to successfully clear and settle open trades that took place prior to the storm and to get its trading, operations, technology, and other support functions mobilized to process business once the financial markets reopened. The Company continues to review both internally and with its landlords and vendors the infrastructure necessary to withstand a similar event in light of the issues arising in the fall of 2012. The Company cannot predict when such review and planning may be complete as it continues to re-build and relocate its necessary infrastructure at its headquarters.

Outlook

The Company’s long-term plan is to continue to expand existing offices by hiring experienced professionals as well as through the purchase of operating branch offices from other broker dealers or the opening of new branch offices in attractive locations, thus maximizing the potential of each office and the development of existing trading, investment banking, investment advisory and other activities. Equally important is the search for viable acquisition candidates. As opportunities are presented, it is the long-term intention of the Company to pursue growth by acquisition where a comfortable match can be found in terms of corporate goals and personnel at a price that would provide the Company’s stockholders with incremental value. The Company may review potential acquisition opportunities, and will continue to focus its attention on the management of its existing business. In addition, the Company is committed to improving its technology capabilities to support client service and the expansion of its capital markets capabilities.

Results of Operations

The Company reported net income of $3.7 million or $0.27 per share for the first quarter of 2013 compared with a net loss of $4.7 million or $(0.34) per share for the first quarter of 2012. Revenue for the first quarter of 2013 was $239.1 million compared with $238.2 million in the first quarter of 2012, an increase of 0.4%.

The following table and discussion summarizes the changes in the major revenue and expense categories for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012:



(expressed in thousands of dollars)	Amount Change			% Change
Revenue
Commissions	$	(6,054	)		-4.8
Principal transactions, net		3,162			25.2
Interest		(1,022	)		-7.6
Investment banking		(1,639	)		-8.2
Advisory fees		6,643			13.3
Other		(158	)		-1.0

Total revenue		932			0.4

Expenses
Compensation and related expenses		558			0.4
Clearing and exchange fees		11			0.2
Communications and technology		(274	)		-1.7
Occupancy and equipment costs		(6,779	)		-27.8
Interest		(1,930	)		-22.0
Other		(3,856	)		-12.5

Total expenses		(12,270	)		-5.0

Income before income taxes		13,202			*
Income tax provision		5,426			*

Net income		7,776			*
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest, net of tax		(544	)		-70.3

Net income attributable to the Company	$	8,320			*

*	Not comparable

Commission revenue was $119.6 million for the first quarter of 2013, a decrease of 4.8% compared with $125.6 million for the first quarter of 2012, primarily attributable to lower transaction volumes and participation by retail investors.

Principal transaction revenue was $15.7 million for the first quarter of 2013, an increase of 25.2% compared with $12.6 million for the first quarter of 2012. The increase is primarily due to a lower valuation adjustment against the Company’s holdings of and commitments to purchase client auction rate securities of $138,000 for the first quarter of 2013 compared to $4.1 million for the same period in 2012 as well as receipt of a $1.8 million monetary recovery from a position previously deemed worthless held by the Company. These increases were offset by lower income from corporate/sovereign bond trading of $1.3 million and agencies trading of $1.4 million.

Interest revenue was $12.4 million for the first quarter of 2013, a decrease of 7.6% compared with $13.4 million for the first quarter of 2012, primarily as a result of a reduction in interest revenue associated with government and agency positions.

Investment banking revenue was down 8.2% to $18.4 million compared with $20.1 million for the first quarter of 2012. The decrease is primarily attributable to lower fees earned on equity underwritings which declined $1.8 million for the first quarter of 2013. While the Company participated in more issues (24 in the first quarter of 2013 versus 19 in the first quarter of 2012), its revenue declined.

Advisory fees were $56.7 million for the first quarter of 2013, an increase of 13.3% compared with $50.1 million for the first quarter of 2012, primarily as a result of an increase in assets under management (“AUM”) during the fourth quarter of 2012. AUM increased 12.4% from $18.6 billion to $20.9 billion from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012, which contributed to the aforementioned advisory fee increase as these fees are booked in advance.

Other revenue was $16.3 million for the first quarter of 2013, remained relatively flat compared with $16.5 million for the first quarter of 2012.

Compensation and benefits (including salaries, production and incentive compensation, share-based compensation, deferred compensation, and other benefit-related items) totaled $159.2 million during the 2013 period, an increase of 0.4% over the first quarter of 2012. Compensation as a percentage of revenue was 66.7% for both the first quarter of 2013 and 2012. Higher healthcare costs were largely responsible for the increase.

Non-compensation expenses decreased to $73.2 million during the 2013 period from $86.1 million during the same period last year, a decrease of $12.9 million or 14.9%. A significant driver for the decrease was related to additional costs of $6.3 million incurred in the first quarter of 2012 in connection with the Company’s New York City real estate consolidation in the form of overlapping rent expense, accelerated amortization of fixed and intangible assets, and relocation costs. Also, contributing substantially to the decrease was a $5 million reduction in legal costs during the 2013 first quarter.


	For the 3-Months Ended
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	3/31/13			3/31/12			% Change
Revenue
Private Client	$	143,369		$	144,263			-0.6
Asset Management		20,956			19,044			10.0
Capital Markets		65,131			69,329			-6.1
Commercial Mortgage Banking		8,066			8,054			0.2
Corporate/Other		1,624			(2,476	)		*

		239,146			238,214			0.4

Pre-Tax Income (Loss)
Private Client		17,327			14,962			15.8
Asset Management		6,543			4,990			31.1
Capital Markets		3,533			(1,655	)		*
Commercial Mortgage Banking		2,878			3,830			-24.9
Corporate/Other		(23,568	)		(28,616	)		17.6

	$	6,713		$	(6,489	)		*

*	Not comparable

Private Client

Private Client reported revenue of $143.4 million for the first quarter of 2013, 0.6% lower than the first quarter of 2012. Pre-tax income was $17.3 million, an increase of 15.8% compared with the first quarter of 2012, primarily due to decreased legal costs of $3.6 million during the first quarter of 2013 compared with 2012.

•

Client assets under administration reached record levels of $84.9 billion at March 31, 2013, an increase of 9% from March 31, 2012.

•

Financial Advisor headcount was 1,405 at the end of the quarter, down from 1,435 from the prior year period.

•

Retail commissions were $82.1 million for the quarter, a decrease of 5.8% over the prior year quarter.

•

Advisory fee revenue on traditional and alternative managed products was $35.9 million for the first quarter of 2013, an increase of 16.3% over the prior year quarter (see Asset Management below for further information).

•

Money market fee waivers were $7.2 million during the first quarter of 2013 versus $6.0 million during the first quarter of 2012.

Asset Management

Asset Management reported revenue of $21.0 million for the first quarter of 2013, 10.0% higher than the first quarter of 2012. Pre-tax income was $6.5 million, an increase of 31.1% compared with the first quarter of 2012, as a result of increased fees earned on managed products as well as lower compensation costs.

•

Advisory fee revenue on traditional and alternative managed products was $18.5 million for the first quarter of 2013, an increase of 11.2% over the prior year quarter. Asset management fees are calculated based on client assets under management (“AUM”) at the end of the prior quarter which totaled $20.9 billion at December 31, 2012 ($18.6 billion at December 31, 2011) and are allocated to the Private Client and Asset Management Divisions.

•

AUM increased 11.4% to $22.4 billion at March 31, 2013, a record for the Company, from $20.1 billion at March 31, 2012, which is the basis for advisory fee billings for the second quarter of 2013. The increase in AUM was comprised of asset appreciation of $1.6 billion and net new assets of $0.7 billion.

Capital Markets

Capital Markets reported revenue of $65.1 million for the first quarter of 2013, 6.1% lower than the first quarter of 2012. Pre-tax income was $3.5 million during the first quarter of 2013 compared with a loss of $1.7 million during the first quarter of 2012, which arose primarily from overlapping rent expense and accelerated amortization of intangible assets during the earlier period.

•

Institutional equities commissions were $25.2 million for the first quarter of 2013, a decrease of 12.3% compared with the prior period.

•

Advisory fees from investment banking activities decreased 14.5% to $5.8 million in the first quarter of 2013.

•

Equity underwriting fees declined $1.8 million to $8.6 million for the first quarter of 2013. While the Company participated in more issues (24 in the first quarter of 2013 versus 19 in the first quarter of 2012) its revenue declined.

•

Revenue from Taxable Fixed Income decreased 2.2% to $20.8 million for the 2013 first quarter.

•

Public Finance and Municipal Trading revenue was up 65.9% to $5.5 million for the first quarter of 2013.

Commercial Mortgage Banking

Commercial Mortgage Banking reported revenue of $8.1 million for the first quarter of 2013, 0.2% higher than the first quarter of 2012. Pre-tax income was $2.9 million, a decrease of $952,000 or 24.9% compared with the first quarter of 2012, primarily due to increased compensation costs associated with a higher headcount in 2013 compared to the prior year.

•

Loan origination fees for the period were $1.6 million as the Company originated 20 commercial loans with principal loan balances of $151.0 million.

•

Net servicing revenue for the period was $1.2 million compared with $927,000 for the comparable period in 2012.

•

Principal loan balances related to servicing activities totaled $3.5 billion during the 2013 period, up 25% from the first quarter of 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Total assets at March 31, 2013 decreased by 1.9% from December 31, 2012 due to lower outstanding receivables for securities borrowed. The Company satisfies its need for short-term funds from internally generated funds and collateralized and uncollateralized borrowings, consisting primarily of bank loans, stock loans, uncommitted lines of credit, and warehouse facilities. The Company finances its trading in government securities through the use of repurchase agreements. The Company’s longer-term capital needs are met through the issuance of the Notes (see “Refinancing” below). The amount of Oppenheimer’s bank borrowings fluctuates in response to changes in the level of the Company’s securities inventories and customer margin debt, changes in notes receivable from employees, investment in office facilities, and changes in stock loan balances and financing through repurchase agreements. Oppenheimer has arrangements with banks for borrowings on a fully-collateralized basis. At March 31, 2013, the Company had $204.0 million of such borrowings outstanding compared to outstanding borrowings of $128.3 million at December 31, 2012. The Company also has some availability of short-term bank financing on an unsecured basis.

Volatility in the financial markets, and the continuance of credit and sovereign debt issues throughout the world, has had an adverse affect on the availability of credit through traditional sources. As a result of concerns around financial markets generally and the strength of counterparties specifically, lenders have reduced and, in some cases, ceased to provide funding on both a secured and unsecured basis to financial service providers. As of March 31, 2013, the Company did not have any exposure to European sovereign debt.

On August 5, 2011, Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) lowered its long term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America from AAA to AA+. Credit agencies have also reduced the credit ratings of various sovereign nations in recent months. While the ultimate impact of such action is inherently unpredictable, these downgrades could have a material adverse impact on financial markets and economic conditions throughout the world, including, specifically, the United States. Moreover, the market’s anticipation of these impacts could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and liquidity. The negative impact that may result from these downgrades or any future downgrade could adversely affect our credit ratings, as well as those of our clients and/or counterparties and could require us to post additional collateral on loans collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities. The unprecedented nature of these and any future negative credit rating actions with respect to U.S. government obligations and the credit ratings of other sovereign nations may have an impact on our business, financial condition and liquidity. See Item 1A “Risk Factors- The recent downgrade of U.S. long term sovereign debt obligations and issues affecting the sovereign debt of European nations may adversely affect markets and our business” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

In February 2010, Oppenheimer finalized settlements with each of the New York Attorney General’s office (“NYAG”) and the Massachusetts Securities Division (“MSD” and, together with the NYAG, the “Regulators”) concluding investigations and administrative proceedings by the Regulators concerning Oppenheimer’s marketing and sale of ARS. Pursuant to those settlements and legal settlements, as of March 31, 2013, the Company purchased and holds approximately $78.2 million in ARS from its clients pursuant to several purchase offers and legal settlements. The Company’s purchases of ARS from its clients will, subject to the terms and conditions of the settlements with the Regulators, continue on a periodic basis thereafter pursuant to the settlements with the Regulators. In addition, the Company is committed to purchase another $39.3 million in ARS from clients through 2016. The ultimate amount of ARS to be repurchased by the Company cannot be predicted with any certainty and will be impacted by redemptions by issuers and legal and other actions by clients during the relevant period, which cannot be predicted. The Company also held $150,000 on in ARS in its proprietary trading account as of March 31, 2013 as a result of the failed auctions in February 2008. These ARS positions primarily represent Auction Rate Preferred Securities issued by closed-end funds and, to a lesser extent, Municipal Auction Rate Securities which are municipal bonds wrapped by municipal bond insurance and Student Loan Auction Rate Securities which are asset-backed securities backed by student loans.

Refinancing

On April 12, 2011, the Company completed the private placement of $200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.75 percent Senior Secured Notes (“Notes”) due April 15, 2018 at par. The interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on April 15^th and October 15^th. Proceeds from the private placement were used to retire the Senior Secured Credit Note due 2013 ($22.4 million) and the Subordinated Note due 2014 ($100.0 million) and for other general corporate purposes. The private placement resulted in the fixing of the interest rate over the term of the Notes compared to the variable rate debt that was retired and an extension of the debt maturity dates as described above. The cost to issue the Notes was approximately $4.6 million which was capitalized in the second quarter of 2011 and will be amortized over the period of the Notes.

On July 12, 2011, the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, filed to register the exchange of the Notes for fully registered Notes, was declared effective by the SEC. The Exchange Offer was completed in its entirety on August 9, 2011.

On April 4, 2012, the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed to enable the Company to act as a market maker in connection with the Notes was declared effective by the SEC.

On March 22, 2013, S&P lowered its rating on the Company and on the Notes to ‘B’ from ‘B+’ with a stable outlook citing recent weak operating results and ongoing legal and litigation costs related to ARS. The downgrade could negatively impact the Company’s business.

Interest expense on the Notes for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $4.3 million ($4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012).

Liquidity

For the most part, the Company’s assets consist of cash and assets which can be readily converted into cash. Receivable from dealers and clearing organizations represents deposits for securities borrowed transactions, margin deposits or current transactions awaiting settlement. Receivable from customers represents margin balances and amounts due on transactions awaiting settlement. Our receivables are, for the most part, collateralized by marketable securities. The Company’s collateral maintenance policies and procedures are designed to limit the Company’s exposure to credit risk. Securities owned, with the exception of the ARS, are mainly comprised of actively trading, readily marketable securities. The Company advanced $2.7 million in forgivable notes, to financial advisers (which are inherently illiquid) for the three months ended March 31, 2013 ($5.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012) as upfront or backend inducements. The amount of funds allocated to such inducements will vary with market conditions and available opportunities.

The Company satisfies its need for short-term liquidity from internally generated funds, collateralized and uncollateralized bank borrowings, stock loans and repurchase agreements and warehouse facilities. Bank borrowings are collateralized by firm and customer securities. In addition, letters of credit are issued in the normal course of business to satisfy certain collateral requirements in lieu of depositing cash or securities.

The Company does not repatriate the earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. Foreign earnings are permanently reinvested for the use of the foreign subsidiaries and therefore these foreign earnings are not available to satisfy the domestic liquidity requirements of the Company.

The Company obtains short-term borrowings primarily through bank call loans. Bank call loans are generally payable on demand and bear interest at various rates not exceeding the broker call rate. At March 31, 2013, bank call loans were $204.0 million ($128.3 million at December 31, 2012 and $92.6 million at March 31, 2012). The average bank loan outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $223.2 million ($69.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012). The largest bank loan outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $392.3 million ($157.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012). The average weighted interest rate on bank call loans applicable on March 31, 2013 was 1.25%.

At March 31, 2013, securities loaned balances totaled $175.6 million ($190.4 million at December 31, 2012 and $349.9 million at March 31, 2012). The average daily stock loan balance for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $193.1 million ($342.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012). The largest stock loan balance for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $227.2 million ($400.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012).

The Company finances its government trading operations through the use of securities purchased under agreements to resell (“reverse repurchase agreements”) and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“repurchase agreements”). Except as described below, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, principally involving government and agency securities, are carried at amounts at which securities subsequently will be resold or reacquired as specified in the respective agreements and include accrued interest. Repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are presented on a net-by-counterparty basis, when the repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are executed with the same counterparty, have the same explicit settlement date, are executed in accordance with a master netting arrangement, the securities underlying the repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements exist in “book entry” form and certain other requirements are met.

At March 31, 2013, the gross balances of reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements were $3.9 billion and $4.4 billion, respectively. The average daily balance of reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements on a gross basis for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $2.7 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively ($7.2 billion and $8.2 billion, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2012). The largest amount of reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements outstanding on a gross basis during the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $8.9 billion and $9.5 billion, respectively ($8.8 billion and $9.6 billion, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2012).

At March 31, 2013, the notional value of the repo-to-maturity was $nil. The average balance for the repo-to-maturity for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $nil. At March 31, 2013, the gross leverage ratio was 5.2.

On January 31, 2013, a FINRA arbitration panel rendered a decision in the previously disclosed U.S. Airways case, filed in February 2009, resulting in an award against Oppenheimer in the amount of $30 million including interest and costs on a claim of approximately $140 million (adjusted down from $253 million). The effect of the award resulted in a fourth quarter after-tax charge of $17.9 million. The Company, the ultimate parent of Oppenheimer, has contributed capital into Oppenheimer in an amount equal to the net after tax effect of the award. Accordingly, the Net Capital of Oppenheimer did not change as a result of the award. Oppenheimer paid its respective share of the award on February 25, 2013.

Liquidity Management

The Company manages its need for liquidity on a daily basis to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. The Company’s liquidity needs may be affected by market conditions, increased inventory positions, business expansion and other unanticipated occurrences. In the event that existing financial resources do not satisfy the Company’s needs, the Company may have to seek additional external financing. The availability of such additional external financing may depend on market factors outside the Company’s control.

Funding Risk


	For the three months ended March 31,
(expressed in thousands of dollars)	2013			2012
Cash used in operating activities	$	(105,671	)	$	(40,903	)
Cash used in investing activities		(5,120	)		(4,711	)
Cash provided by financing activities		74,203			62,095

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	(36,588	)	$	16,481

Management believes that funds from operations, combined with the Company’s capital base and available credit facilities, are sufficient for the Company’s liquidity needs in the foreseeable future. (See Factors Affecting “Forward-Looking Statements”).

Other Matters

On February 22, 2013, the Company paid cash dividends of $0.11 per share of Class A and Class B Stock totaling approximately $1.5 million from available cash on hand.

On April 25, 2013, the Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.11 per share of Class A and Class B Stock payable on May 24, 2013 to stockholders of record on May 10, 2013.

The book value of the Company’s Class A and Class B Stock was $37.07 at March 31, 2013 compared to $36.87 at March 21, 2012, based on total outstanding shares of 13,607,998 and 13,588,842, respectively.

The diluted weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B Stock outstanding for the period ended March 31, 2013 was 14,028,715 compared to 13,597,330 outstanding for the same period in 2012.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Information concerning the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements is included in note 5 to the condensed consolidated financial statements appearing in Item 1 herein.

Contractual and Contingent Obligations

The Company has contractual obligations to make payments to CIBC in connection with the acquisition in the form of an earn-out to be paid in 2013. The amount due of $25 million which is in dispute has been placed in escrow pending the outcome of the dispute. On April 12, 2011, the Company repaid the remaining debt assumed upon the acquisition from the proceeds of Notes issued in the amount of $200.0 million. See note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements appearing in Item 1 herein.

The following table sets forth the Company’s contractual and contingent commitments as at March 31, 2013:


(expressed in millions of dollars)	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years
Minimum rentals⁽¹⁾	$	315	$	32	$	73	$	56	$	154
Committed capital		5		5		—		—		—
Earn-out⁽²⁾		25		25		—		—		—
Senior Secured Notes⁽³⁾		195		—		—		—		195
ARS purchase offers⁽⁴⁾		39		15		23		1		—

Total	$	579	$	77	$	96	$	57	$	349

(1)	On July 15, 2011, the Company signed a lease to occupy seven floors at 85 Broad Street in New York City for a term of 15 years. The commitment of $185.4 million related to this lease has been included in the table.

(2)	As noted above in the Liquidity section, this amount has been placed in escrow pending the outcome of legal proceedings against CIBC

(3)	The Senior Secured Credit Note and the Subordinated Note were retired on April 12, 2011 and the Company issued $200 million in 8.75% Senior Secured Notes due April 15, 2018 and bought back $5.0 million of such Notes in November 2011.

(4)	Represents payments to be made pursuant to the ARS settlements entered into with Regulators in February 2010 as well as commitments to purchase ARS as a result of legal settlements.

Inflation

Because the assets of the Company’s brokerage subsidiaries are highly liquid, and because securities inventories are carried at current market values, the impact of inflation generally is reflected in the financial statements. However, the rate of inflation affects the Company’s costs relating to employee compensation, rent, communications and certain other operating costs, and such costs may not be recoverable in the level of commissions or fees charged. To the extent inflation results in rising interest rates and has other adverse effects upon the securities markets, it may adversely affect the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

Factors Affecting “Forward-Looking Statements”

From time to time, the Company may publish “Forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act or make oral statements that constitute forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may relate to such matters as anticipated financial performance, future revenues or earnings, business prospects, projected ventures, new products, anticipated market performance, and similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company cautions readers that a variety of factors could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, include, but are not limited to: (i) transaction volume in the securities markets, (ii) the volatility of the securities markets, (iii) fluctuations in interest rates, (iv) changes in regulatory requirements which could affect the cost and method of doing business and reduce returns, (v) fluctuations in currency rates, (vi) general economic conditions, both domestic and international, (vii) changes in the rate of inflation and the related impact on the securities markets, (viii) competition from existing financial institutions and other participants in the securities markets, (ix) legal developments affecting the litigation experience of the securities industry and the Company, including developments arising from the failure of the Auction Rate Securities markets and the results of pending litigation involving the Company, (x) changes in federal and state tax laws which could affect the popularity of products sold by the Company or impose taxes on securities transactions, (xi) the effectiveness of efforts to reduce costs and eliminate overlap, (xii) war and nuclear confrontation as well as political unrest and regime changes, (xiii) the Company’s ability to achieve its business plan, (xiv) corporate governance issues, (xv) the impact of the credit crisis and tight credit markets on business operations, (xvi) the effect of bailout, financial reform and related legislation including, without limitation, the Dodd-Frank Act and the proposed Volcker Rule, (xvii) the consolidation of the banking and financial services industry, (xviii) the effects of the economy on the Company’s ability to find and maintain financing options and liquidity, (xix) credit, operations, legal and regulatory risks, (xx) risks related to foreign operations, (xxi) risks related to the downgrade of U.S. long-term sovereign debt obligations and the sovereign debt of European nations, (xxii) risks related to the manipulation of LIBOR, (xxiii) the effects of Hurricane Sandy and the relocation of critical Company personnel, and (xxiv) risks related to the lowering by S&P of its rating on the Company and on the Notes. There can be no assurance that the Company has correctly or completely identified and assessed all of the factors affecting the Company’s business. The Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. See Item 1A – “Risk Factors” appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, there were no material changes to the information contained in Part II, Item 7A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a–15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures or its internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include, but are not limited to, the realities that judgments in decision–making can be faulty and that break-downs can occur because of a simple error or omission. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost–effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. The Company confirms that its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the three months ended March 31, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Many aspects of the Company’s business involve substantial risks of liability. In the normal course of business, the Company has been the subject of customer complaints and has been named as a defendant or co-defendant in various lawsuits or arbitrations creating substantial exposure. The incidences of these types of claims have increased since the onset of the credit crisis in 2008 and the resulting market disruptions. The Company is also involved from time to time in certain governmental and self-regulatory agency investigations and proceedings. These proceedings arise primarily from securities brokerage, asset management and investment banking activities. There has been an increased incidence of regulatory investigations in the financial services industry in recent years, including customer claims, which seek substantial penalties, fines or other monetary relief.

While the ultimate resolution of routine pending litigation and other matters cannot be currently determined, in the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the Company does not believe that the resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition. However, the Company’s results of operations could be materially affected during any period if liabilities in that period differ from prior estimates.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, an adverse result in any of the matters set forth below or multiple adverse results in arbitrations and litigations currently filed or to be filed against the Company, including arbitrations and litigations relating to auction rate securities, would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition, including its cash position.

The materiality of legal matters to the Company’s future operating results depends on the level of future results of operations as well as the timing and ultimate outcome of such legal matters. See “Risk Factors – The Company may continue to be adversely affected by the failure of the Auction Rate Securities Market” as well as “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Regulatory and Legal Environment – Other Regulatory Matters and – Other Matters” as well as “Factors Affecting ‘Forward-Looking Statements’” herein.

In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company establishes reserves for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. When loss contingencies are not both probable and reasonably estimable, the Company does not establish reserves. In some of the matters described below under “Legal Proceedings”, loss contingencies are not probable and reasonably estimable in the view of management and, accordingly, reserves have not been established for those matters. For legal proceedings set forth below where there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may be incurred, the Company estimates a range of aggregate loss in excess of amounts accrued of $0 to approximately $125.5 million. This estimated aggregate range is based upon currently available information for those legal proceedings in which the Company is involved, where an estimate for such losses can be made. For certain cases, the Company does not believe that an estimate can currently be made. The foregoing estimate is based on various factors, including the varying stages of the proceedings (including the fact that many are currently in preliminary stages), the numerous yet-unresolved issues in many of the proceedings and the attendant uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings. Accordingly, the Company’s estimate will change from time to time, and actual losses may be more than the current estimate.

Auction Rate Securities Matters

For a number of years, the Company offered auction rate securities (“ARS”) to its clients. A significant portion of the market in ARS ‘failed’ in February 2008 due to credit market conditions, and dealers were no longer willing or able to purchase the imbalance between supply and demand for ARS. See “Risk Factors – The Company may continue to be adversely affected by the failure of the Auction Rate Securities Market” as well as “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Business Environment – Other Regulatory Matters and – Other Matters” herein.

Oppenheimer offered ARS to its clients in the same manner as dozens of other “downstream” firms in the ARS marketplace—as an available cash management option for clients seeking to increase their yields on short-term investments similar to a money market fund. The Company believes that Oppenheimer’s participation therefore differs dramatically from that of the larger broker-dealers who underwrote and provided supporting bids in the auctions and who subsequently entered into settlements with state and federal regulators, agreeing to purchase billions of dollars of their clients’ ARS holdings. Unlike these other broker-dealers, Oppenheimer did not act as the lead or sole lead managing underwriter or dealer in any ARS auctions during the relevant time period, did not enter support bids to ensure that any ARS auctions cleared, and played no role in any decision by the lead underwriters or broker-dealers to discontinue entering support bids and allowing auctions to fail.

As previously disclosed, Oppenheimer entered into a Consent Order (the “Order”) pursuant to the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act on February 26, 2010 settling a pending administrative proceeding against the respondents related to Oppenheimer’s sales of ARS to retail and other investors in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Oppenheimer did not admit or deny any of the findings or allegations contained in the underlying administrative complaint. Oppenheimer agreed to pay, and has paid, the external costs incurred by the Massachusetts Securities Division (the “MSD”) related to the investigation and the administrative proceeding in the amount of $250,000.

As previously disclosed, on February 23, 2010, the New York Attorney General (“NYAG”) accepted Oppenheimer’s offer of settlement and entered an Assurance of Discontinuance (“AOD”) pursuant to New York State Executive Law Section 63(15) in connection with Oppenheimer’s marketing and sale of ARS. Oppenheimer did not admit or deny any of the findings or allegations contained in the AOD and no fine was imposed.

Pursuant to the terms of the Order, Oppenheimer commenced and closed three offers to purchase Eligible ARS (as defined in the Order) from Customer Accounts (as defined in the Order) during 2010 and 2011 with the final offer closing on April 7, 2011. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the AOD, the Company has made five offers to purchase ARS from Eligible Investors between the periods May 21, 2010 and October 22, 2012. The Company commenced a sixth offer to purchase on March 21, 2013 which will expire on June 4, 2013. The Company’s purchases of ARS from clients have continued and will, subject to the terms and conditions of the settlements with the Regulators, continue on a periodic basis pursuant to the settlements with the Regulators. Accounts were, and will continue to be, aggregated on a “household” basis for purposes of these offers. As at March 31, 2013, the Company had purchased and holds approximately $78.2 million of ARS from repurchases from clients and legal settlements.

The Company’s purchases of ARS from clients will continue on a periodic basis pursuant to the settlements with the Regulators. Oppenheimer has agreed with the NYAG that it will offer to purchase Eligible ARS from Eligible Investors who did not receive an initial purchase offer, periodically, as excess funds become available to Oppenheimer after giving effect to the financial and regulatory capital constraints applicable to Oppenheimer, until Oppenheimer has extended a purchase offer to all Eligible Investors. Such offers will remain open for a period of seventy-five days from the date on which each such offer to purchase is sent. The ultimate amount of ARS to be repurchased by the Company cannot be predicted with any certainty and will be impacted by redemptions by issuers and client actions during the period, which also cannot be predicted.

In addition, Oppenheimer has agreed to work with issuers and other interested parties, including regulatory and other authorities and industry participants, to provide liquidity solutions for other Massachusetts clients not covered by the offers to purchase. In that regard, on May 21, 2010, Oppenheimer offered such clients a margin loan against marginable collateral with respect to such account holders’ holdings of Eligible ARS. As of March 31, 2013, Oppenheimer had extended margin loans to six holders of Eligible ARS from Massachusetts.

Further, Oppenheimer has agreed to (1) no later than 75 days after Oppenheimer has completed extending a purchase offer to all Eligible Investors (as defined in the AOD), use its best efforts to identify any Eligible Investors who purchased Eligible ARS (as defined in the AOD) and subsequently sold those securities below par between February 13, 2008 and February 23, 2010 and pay the investor the difference between par and the price at which the Eligible Investor sold the Eligible ARS, plus reasonable interest thereon (the “ARS Losses”); (2) no later than 75 days after Oppenheimer has completed extending a Purchase Offer to all Eligible Investors, use its best efforts to identify Eligible Investors who took out loans from Oppenheimer after February 13, 2008 that were secured by Eligible ARS that were not successfully auctioning at the time the loan was taken out from Oppenheimer and who paid interest associated with the ARS-based portion of those loans in excess of the total interest and dividends received on the Eligible ARS during the duration of the loan (the “Loan Cost Excess”) and reimburse such investors for the Loan Cost Excess plus reasonable interest thereon; (3) upon providing liquidity to all Eligible Investors, participate in a special arbitration process for the exclusive purpose of arbitrating any Eligible Investor’s claim for consequential damages against Oppenheimer related to the investor’s inability to sell Eligible ARS; and (4) work with issuers and other interested parties, including regulatory and governmental entities, to expeditiously provide liquidity solutions for institutional investors not within the definition of Small Businesses and Institutions (as defined in the AOD) that held ARS in Oppenheimer brokerage accounts on February 13, 2008. Oppenheimer believes that because Items (1) through (3) above will occur only after it has provided liquidity to all Eligible Investors, it will take an extended period of time before the requirements of Items (1) through (3) will take effect.

Each of the AOD and the Order provides that in the event that Oppenheimer enters into another agreement that provides any form of benefit to any Oppenheimer ARS customer on terms more favorable than those set forth in the AOD or the Order, Oppenheimer will immediately extend the more favorable terms contained in such other agreement to all eligible investors. In the case of the Order, it is limited to more favorable agreements entered into subsequent to the February 26, 2010 Order while, in the case of the AOD, it covers more favorable agreements entered into prior and subsequent to the February 23, 2010 AOD. The AOD further provides that if Oppenheimer pays (or makes any pledge or commitment to pay) to any governmental entity or regulator pursuant to any other agreement costs or a fine or penalty or any other monetary amount, then an equivalent payment, pledge or commitment will become immediately owed to the State of New York for the benefit of New York residents.

If Oppenheimer fails to comply with any of the terms set forth in the Order, the MSD may institute an action to have the Order declared null and void and reinstitute the previously pending administrative proceedings. If Oppenheimer defaults on any obligation under the AOD, the NYAG may terminate the AOD, at his sole discretion, upon 10 days written notice to Oppenheimer.

Reference is made to the Order between the MSD and Oppenheimer et al, described in Item 3 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and attached as Exhibit 10.24 thereto, as well as the disclosures related thereto in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010, September 30, 2010, 2011 and 2012 and in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2010, and 2011 and 2012 for additional details of the agreements with the MSD. Reference is also made to the AOD between the NYAG and Oppenheimer, described in Item 3 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and attached as Exhibit 10.22 thereto, as well as the disclosures related thereto in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010, September 30, 2010, 2011 and. 2012 and in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012, for additional details of the agreements with the NYAG.

Since October 2011, Oppenheimer and OAM have been responding to information requests from the SEC and the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (“MA AG”) regarding an alleged overvaluation in the fall of 2009 of a single portfolio holding in the Oppenheimer Global Resource Private Equity Fund L.P. (“OGRPE”) as well as certain marketing practices associated with OGRPE that occurred during the same time period. Oppenheimer and OAM have responded to document requests and there has been on-the-record testimony given by members of OAM’s private equity group as well as supervisory personnel.

On March 11, 2013, OAM and its affiliate, Oppenheimer Alternative Investment Management, LLC (“OAIM”), without admitting or denying the findings, consented to the issuance of an administrative order (the “Order”) with the SEC. Also on March 11, 2013, OAM entered into an Assurance of Discontinuance (“AOD”) with the MA AG based on the same conduct that was the subject of the Order. The Order and the AOD concerned misrepresentations and omissions to investors and prospective investors about the asset value of one of the assets in a fund of private equity funds. The Order and the AOD found that while the written policies and procedures of OAM and OAIM required the compliance department to review and approve marketing materials, those procedures did not require a review of portfolio manager valuations and accordingly were not reasonably designed to ensure that valuations were determined in a manner consistent with written representations to investors. The SEC found that OAM and OAIM willfully violated, and were censured and ordered to cease and desist from future violations of Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and Section 206(4)-7 and Section 206(4)-8 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”) and Rules 206(4)-7 and 206(4)-8 thereunder. The MA AG found that OAM and OAIM violated M.G.L.c. 93A. The Order and the AOD further provide that OAM and OAIM will pay a total of $2,269,098 in disgorgement to investors who invested in the fund between October 2009 through June 2010, pay a civil penalty of $617,579 to the SEC, pay a penalty of $132,421 to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and retain an independent consultant to conduct a review of their valuation policies and procedures.

On February 24, 2012, Oppenheimer and OAM received notice from the United States Attorney’s Office for Massachusetts (Boston) that it intends to seek information from Oppenheimer and OAM regarding the foregoing matters. Neither Oppenheimer nor OAM has received any further notice from this office.

The Company is continuing to cooperate with investigating entities from states other than Massachusetts and New York.

In February 2009, Oppenheimer received notification of a filing of an arbitration claim before FINRA captioned U.S. Airways v. Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., et. al seeking an award compelling Oppenheimer to purchase approximately $250 million in ARS previously purchased by U.S. Airways through Oppenheimer (which was subsequently reduced to a $110 million liquidated damages claim) or, alternatively, an award rescinding such sale. Claimant sought an award of punitive damages from Oppenheimer as well as interest on such award. Claimant based its claims on numerous causes of action including, but not limited to, fraud, gross negligence, misrepresentation and suitability. On January 31, 2013, the arbitration panel issued an order awarding US Airways $30 million in damages, including interest and costs, on a claim of approximately $140 million (including interest and costs). The Company has incorporated the financial impact of the award, an after-tax charge of $17.9 million, into its 2012 financial results. Oppenheimer paid the award on February 25, 2013.

In connection with the U.S. Airways matter, on July 10, 2009, Oppenheimer asserted a third party statement of claim against Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. (“DBSI”) and Deutsche Bank A.G. (“Deutsche AG”). Deutsche AG challenged Oppenheimer’s efforts to compel that entity to appear at a FINRA arbitration since, Deutsche AG argued, it is not a FINRA member. Subsequently, Oppenheimer deferred further action against Deutsche AG and proceeded prosecuting its third party claim against DBSI. At the same time, Oppenheimer filed its answer denying any liability to U.S. Airways. DBSI subsequently filed a motion to sever the arbitration into a separate proceeding which motion was granted on July 28, 2010. To the extent there has been a determination by an arbitration panel that U.S. Airways has been harmed, Oppenheimer’s third party statement of claim against DBSI alleges that DBSI is liable to U.S. Airways because of its role in the process of creating, marketing and procuring ratings for certain auction rate credit-linked notes purchased by U.S. Airways. No date has yet been set for the arbitration with the DBSI. On January 28, 2011, DBSI filed a motion to stay the DBSI arbitration. Oppenheimer filed its opposition to the DBSI motion to stay on February 25, 2011. On May 25, 2011, the arbitration panel granted DBSI’s motion to stay the DBSI arbitration. On June 10, 2011, Oppenheimer filed a motion for reconsideration of the arbitration panel’s decision to stay the arbitration which motion for reconsideration was denied on July 14, 2011. As a result of the award in favor of US Airways, Oppenheimer took steps to lift the stay of the arbitration and to prosecute its claim in arbitration against DBSI in an effort to, among other things, recover in full the amount paid to US Airways pursuant to the order described above plus all associated costs. No date yet has been set for the commencement of the arbitration. There can be no assurance Oppenheimer will prevail in the arbitration against DBSI or that it will recover any or all of the amounts paid by Oppenheimer to US Airways.

In addition to the ARS case discussed above, as of March 31, 2013, Oppenheimer and certain affiliated parties are currently named as a defendant or respondent in approximately seven arbitration claims before FINRA, as well as one court action brought by individuals and entities who purchased ARS through Oppenheimer in amounts ranging from $65,000 to $20 million, seeking awards compelling Oppenheimer to repurchase such ARS or, alternatively, awards rescinding such sales, based on a variety of causes of action similar to those described above. The Company has filed, or is in the process of filing, its responses to such claims and has participated in or is awaiting hearings regarding such claims before FINRA or in the court actions. As of March 31, 2013, ten ARS matters were concluded in either court or arbitration with Oppenheimer prevailing in four of those matters and the claimants prevailing in six of those matters. The Company has purchased approximately $7.6 million in ARS from the prevailing claimants in those six actions. In addition, the Company has made cash payments of approximately $12.5 million as a result of legal settlements with clients. Oppenheimer believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims in the pending arbitrations and court actions and intends to vigorously defend against these claims. Oppenheimer may also implead third parties, including underwriters where it believes such action is appropriate. It is possible that other individuals or entities that purchased ARS from Oppenheimer may bring additional claims against Oppenheimer in the future for repurchase or rescission.

See Item 1A, “Risk Factors – The Company may continue to be adversely affected by the failure of the Auction Rate Securities Market,” and note 13 to the consolidated financial statements appearing in Item 1 herein as well as “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Regulatory and Legal Environment – Other Regulatory Matters and – Other Matters” herein.

Other Pending Matters

In addition to the ARS case discussed above, on or about March 13, 2008, Oppenheimer was served in a matter pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Georgia, captioned William Perkins, Trustee for International Management Associates v. Lehman Brothers, Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., JB Oxford & Co., Bank of America Securities LLC and TD Ameritrade Inc. The Trustee seeks to set aside as fraudulent transfers in excess of $25 million in funds embezzled by the sole portfolio manager for International Management Associates, a hedge fund. Said portfolio manager purportedly used the broker dealer defendants, including Oppenheimer, as conduits for his embezzlement. Oppenheimer filed its answer to the complaint on June 18, 2010. Oppenheimer filed a motion for summary judgment, which was argued on March 31, 2011. Immediately thereafter, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed all of the Trustee’s claims against all defendants including Oppenheimer. In June 2011, the Trustee filed an appeal with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. In addition, on June 10, 2011, the Trustee filed a petition for permission to appeal the dismissal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. On July 27, 2011, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied the Trustee’s Petition. The Trustee then appealed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (U.S.N.D. GA). On March 30, 2012, the U.S.N.D. GA affirmed in part and reversed in part the ruling from the Bankruptcy Court and remanded the matter to the Bankruptcy Court. The parties are actively engaged in discovery. Oppenheimer believes that as a result of the foregoing the claimed damages against Oppenheimer have been substantially reduced and that it has meritorious defenses to the remaining claims made against it and intends to defend itself vigorously.

In March 2010, the Company received a notice from counsel representing a receiver appointed by a state district court in Oklahoma (the “Receiver”) to oversee a liquidation proceeding of Providence Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Providence”), an Oklahoma insurance company. That notice demanded the return of Providence’s municipal bond portfolio of approximately $55 million that had been custodied at Oppenheimer beginning in January 2009. In January 2009, the municipal bond portfolio had been transferred to an insurance holding company, Park Avenue Insurance LLC (“Park Avenue”), as part of a purchase and sale transaction. Park Avenue used the portfolio as collateral for a margin loan used to fund the purchase of Providence from Providence’s parent. On October 19, 2010, Oppenheimer was named as a co-defendant in a complaint filed by the Receiver in state district court for Oklahoma County, Oklahoma captioned State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Kim Holland, Insurance Commissioner, as Receiver for Park Avenue Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Providence Holdings, Inc., Falcon Holdings, LLC et. al alleging, that all defendants conspired to unlawfully transfer the assets of Providence to Park Avenue. In addition to Oppenheimer, the complaint names as defendants nine individuals alleging they were members of the board of directors of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. during the time period at issue. In fact, for the time period alleged, six of these individuals were not members of such board. The complaint was subsequently amended to name three individuals including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, who is the only individual who has been served, who were directors of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. at the time of the events in question. The complaint alleges causes of action for negligence, breach of fiduciary duty and trespass to chattel and/or conversion and seeks actual damages of $102 million, punitive damages, interest and costs, including attorneys’ fees. Oppenheimer moved to remove the matter to the United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma on December 2, 2010. Thereafter, the Receiver moved to remand the matter to the District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. Oppenheimer filed its opposition to this motion on February 3, 2011; the motion to remand was granted on February 24, 2011. On January 18, 2011 and March 28, 2011, motions to dismiss the complaint were filed on behalf of Oppenheimer and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, respectively. On June 17, 2011, the motion to dismiss Oppenheimer was deferred and the motion to dismiss the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer was granted in its entirety. The motion to dismiss the Receiver’s action against Oppenheimer, which was refiled in state court after remand from the Federal court, was denied on August 2, 2011. On July 20, 2012, Providence Holding, Inc. (“Providence Holding”), the seller of Providence to Park Avenue in the transaction referenced above, filed a motion in the Oklahoma proceeding for permission to assert a tardy cross-claim against Oppenheimer and Oppenheimer Trust Company alleging breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, breach of contract, and interference with prospective business advantage. Providence Holding’s motion was mooted by the Receiver’s service of an amended complaint on December 20, 2012, which refreshed Providence Holding’s right to serve cross-claims. Oppenheimer answered the amended complaint on January 23, 2013 and the other Oppenheimer entities named as defendants filed motions to dismiss the amended complaint, which motions were denied on March 8, 2013. On January 14, 2013, Providence Holdings, Inc. served an answer to the amended complaint and interposed cross-claims against Oppenheimer, Oppenheimer Trust Company and three other Oppenheimer companies: the Company, Oppenheimer Asset Management, Inc. and Oppenheimer Investment Management. All Oppenheimer entities served motions to dismiss the Providence Holdings, Inc. cross claims on February 7, 2013 which motions were denied on March 8, 2013. On September 7, 2012, the court entered a scheduling order requiring that all discovery be completed by December 4, 2013. Discovery is ongoing. On October 1, 2012, a 13-count indictment was unsealed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York charging three individuals, including a former registered representative of Oppenheimer, with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with Park Avenue’s acquisition of Providence. Oppenheimer is not named in the indictment, and there are no indications that it is a target of any investigation. Oppenheimer believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims raised in the Oklahoma proceedings and intends to defend against these claims vigorously.

On June 24, 2011, Oppenheimer was served with a petition in a matter pending in state court in Collin County, Texas captioned Jerry Lancaster, Providence Holdings, Inc., Falcon Holdings, LLC and Derek Lancaster v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., Oppenheimer Trust Company, Charles Antonuicci, Alan Reichman, John Carley, Park Avenue Insurance, LLC and Park Avenue Bank. The action requests unspecified damages, including exemplary damages, for Oppenheimer’s alleged breach of fiduciary duty, negligent hiring, fraud, conversion, conspiracy, breach of contract, unjust enrichment and violation of the Texas Business and Commerce Code. The first amended petition alleges that Oppenheimer held itself out as having expertise in the insurance industry generally and managing insurance companies’ investment portfolios but inappropriately allowed plaintiffs’ bond portfolios to be used by Park Avenue Insurance Company to secure the sale of Providence Property and Casualty Insurance Company to Park Avenue Insurance Company. On July 22, 2011, defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, and subsequently moved to dismiss or transfer the action. On October 5, 2011 plaintiffs filed a voluntary dismissal without prejudice. On the same date, Oppenheimer and Oppenheimer Trust Company agreed to suspend the running of any applicable statute of limitations defense for one year. Just prior to the expiration of the one-year tolling agreement, on October 3, 2012, Providence Holding filed a new action in the United States District Court for the Eastern Division of Texas against Oppenheimer, Oppenheimer Trust Company, and two individuals, re-asserting basically the same claims. On December 18, 2012, Oppenheimer and Oppenheimer Trust Company filed motions (i) to dismiss the new complaint and (ii) to stay the action pending resolution of all claims among the parties in the action pending in Oklahoma styled State of Oklahoma ex rel. Holland v. Providence Holdings Inc. discussed above. In response to the motions, plaintiffs’ counsel voluntarily agreed to stay their action until the resolution of all claims among the parties in the Oklahoma action. On March 18, 2013, the Texas court issued an order formally approving the parties’ stipulation to stay the action. Oppenheimer believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims raised and intends to defend against these claims vigorously including seeking dismissal of the claims against it.

On March 15, 2013, the Company filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York a breach of contract action against Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (“CIBC”) in connection with the Company’s 2008 acquisition of CIBC’s U.S. capital markets businesses for an amount of damages to be proved at trial. As part of the transaction, the parties provided for a deferred purchase price based on an agreed formula or a minimum payment of $25.0 million. The Company has deposited the $25.0 million in escrow pending the outcome of the legal proceedings. The deferred purchase price amount would have been otherwise due in April 2013 absent the breach of the agreements governing the sale of the business asserted by the Company in its complaint. The agreed upon formula did not result in any additional payments and thus the minimum payment amount of $25.0 million is in dispute. The expense related to the deferred purchase price was charged to earnings by the Company over the life of the agreement and was fully accrued for at the end of December 2012.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, there were no material changes to the information contained in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Item 6. Exhibits

(d) Exhibits


31.1		Certification of Albert G. Lowenthal

31.2		Certification of Jeffrey J. Alfano

32		Certification of Albert G. Lowenthal and Jeffrey J. Alfano

101		Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, and (vi) the notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.*

*	This information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, in the City of New York, New York on this 6^th day of May, 2013.

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

By: /s/ Albert G. Lowenthal

Albert G. Lowenthal, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

By: /s/ Jeffrey J. Alfano

Jeffrey J. Alfano, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)