UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014

OR

For the transition period from             to             

Commission File Number 000-55090

 

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

(949) 202-4160

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed, since last year)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every interactive data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) (Check one):

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No   x

 

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

7,734,514 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, as of August 1, 2014

 

 

 

 

---

 

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

(i)

---

 

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

 

(See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements)

 

 

1

---

 

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

 

(See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements)

 

 

 

2

---

 

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME - UNAUDITED

(In thousands)

 

 

(See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements)

 

 

 

3

---

 

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UNAUDITED

(In thousands)

 

 

(See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements)

 

 

 

4

---

 

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 - UNAUDITED

 

NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The consolidated financial statements include First Foundation Inc. (“FFI”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries: First Foundation Advisors (“FFA”), First Foundation Bank (“FFB” or the “Bank”) and First Foundation Insurance Services (“FFIS”), a wholly owned subsidiary of FFB (collectively referred to as the “Company”). All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The results of operations reflect any interim adjustments, all of which are of a normal recurring nature and which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim period presented. The results for the 2014 interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period during or for the full year ending December 31, 2014.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and prevailing practices within the banking industry. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include all information and footnotes required for interim financial statement presentation. Those financial statements assume that readers of this Report have read the most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K which contains the latest available audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2014 presentation.

 

Accounting pronouncements: In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 660): Summary and Amendments that Create Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and Other Assets and Deferred Costs-Contracts with Customers (Subtopic 340-40).” The guidance in this update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the industry topics of the codification. For public companies, this update will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements, but does not expect the guidance to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In January 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-04, "Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure.” The objective of this guidance is to clarify when an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, that is, when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan receivable should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized. ASU No. 2014-04 states that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either (1) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or (2) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. Additionally, ASU No. 2014-04 requires interim and annual disclosure of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. ASU No. 2014-04 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014. The adoption of ASU No. 2014-04 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

---

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 – UNAUDITED

 

NOTE 2: FAIR VALUE

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Current accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The guidance describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments are as follows as of:

 

These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument for sale at one time, nor do they attempt to estimate the value of anticipated future business related to the instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of these estimates.

The following methods and assumptions were used by management to estimate the fair value of its financial instruments:

Cash and Cash Equivalents: The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values and are classified as Level 1.

6

---

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 – UNAUDITED

 

Securities Available-for-Sale: Fair values for securities available for sale are generally determined by matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2).

Loans: Fair values of loans, excluding loans held for sale, are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality resulting in a Level 3 classification. The methods utilized to estimate the fair value of loans do not necessarily represent an exit price.

Investment in FHLB Stock: The carrying amount approximates fair value, as the stock may be sold back to the FHLB at carrying value and no other market exists for the sale of this stock (Level 3).

Deposits: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits, including interest and non-interest demand accounts, savings, and certain types of money market accounts are, by definition, equal to the carrying amount at the reporting date resulting in a Level 1 classification. Fair values for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits resulting in a Level 2 classification.

Borrowings: The carrying value of overnight FHLB advances approximates fair values because of the short-term maturity of this instrument, resulting in a Level 2 classification. The $21.3 million term loan is a variable rate loan for which the rate adjusts quarterly, and as such, its fair value is based on its carrying value resulting in a Level 3 classification.

Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. Those estimates that are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision are included in Level 3. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the fair values presented.

The following table provides quantitative information about the Company’s nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements of its REO as of:

 

Appraisals are performed by certified general appraisers (for commercial properties) or certified residential appraisers (for residential properties) whose qualifications and licenses have been reviewed and verified by the Company. Once received, a member of the Appraisal Department reviews the assumptions and approaches utilized in the appraisal as well as the overall resulting fair value in comparison with independent data sources such as recent market data or industry-wide statistics. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available.

In certain cases we use discounted cash flow or similar internal modeling techniques to determine the fair value of our Level 3 assets and liabilities. Use of these techniques requires determination of relevant inputs and assumptions, some of which represent significant unobservable inputs. Accordingly, changes in these unobservable inputs may have a significant impact on fair value. Certain of these unobservable inputs will (in isolation) have a directionally consistent impact on the fair value of the instrument for a given change in that input. Alternatively, the fair value of the instrument may move in an opposite direction for a given change in another input. Where multiple inputs are used within the valuation technique of an asset or liability, a change in one input in a certain direction may be offset by an opposite change in another input having a potentially muted impact to the overall fair value of that particular instrument. Additionally, a change in one unobservable input may result in a change to another unobservable input (that is, changes in certain inputs are interrelated to one another), which may counteract or magnify the fair value impact.

 

7

---

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 – UNAUDITED

 

NOTE 3: SECURITIES

The following table provides a summary of the Company’s securities AFS portfolio as of:

 

The US Treasury securities are pledged as collateral to the State of California to meet regulatory requirements related to the Bank’s trust operations.

All unrealized losses had been in a continuous loss position less than 12 months as of June 30, 2014. Unrealized losses on FNMA and FHLB agency notes and agency mortgage-backed securities have not been recognized into income because the issuer bonds are of high credit quality, management does not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not that management would be required to sell the securities prior to their anticipated recovery, and the decline in fair value is largely due to changes in interest rates. The fair value is expected to recover as the bonds approach maturity.  

The scheduled maturities of securities AFS and the related weighted average yields were as follows as of June 30, 2014:

 

Agency mortgage backed securities are excluded from the above table because such securities are not due at a single maturity date. The weighted average yield of the agency mortgage backed securities as of June 30, 2014 was 2.49%.

 

8

---

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 – UNAUDITED

 

NOTE 4: LOANS

The following is a summary of our loans as of:

 

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the principal balances shown above are net of unaccreted discount related to loans acquired in an acquisition of $2.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively.

In 2012, the Company purchased loans, for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected. The carrying amount of these purchased credit impaired loans is as follows for the periods indicated:

 

Accretable yield, or income expected to be collected on purchased credit impaired loans, is as follows as of:

 

9

---

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 – UNAUDITED

 

The following table summarizes our delinquent and nonaccrual loans as of:

 

Accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when reasonable doubt exists as to the full, timely collection of interest or principal and, generally, when a loan becomes contractually past due for ninety days or more with respect to principal or interest. The accrual of interest may be continued on a well-secured loan contractually past due ninety days or more with respect to principal or interest if the loan is in the process of collection or collection of the principal and interest is deemed probable. The Bank considers a loan to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it believes it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The determination of past due, nonaccrual or impairment status of loans acquired in an acquisition, other than loans deemed purchased impaired, is the same as loans we originate.

As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had one loan with a balance of $0.1 million classified as a troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”) which is included as nonaccrual in the table above. This loan was classified as a TDR as a result of a reduction in required principal payments and an extension of the maturity date of the loan.

 

10

---

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 – UNAUDITED

 

NOTE 5: ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The following is a roll forward of the Bank’s allowance for loan losses for the following periods:

 

11

---

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 – UNAUDITED

 

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by impairment method as of:

 

The column labeled “Unaccreted Credit Component Other Loans” represents the amount of unaccreted credit component discount for loans acquired in an acquisition that were not classified as purchased impaired or individually evaluated for impairment as of the dates indicated, and the stated principal balance of the related loans. The unaccreted credit component discount is equal to 1.06% and 1.23% of the stated principal balance of these loans as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. In addition to this unaccreted credit component discount, an additional $0.2 million of the ALLL has been provided for these loans as of June 30, 2014.

12

---

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 – UNAUDITED

 

The Bank categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, collateral adequacy, credit documentation, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Bank analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis typically includes larger, non-homogeneous loans such as loans secured by multifamily or commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans. This analysis is performed on an ongoing basis as new information is obtained. The Bank uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Pass: Loans classified as pass are strong credits with no existing or known potential weaknesses deserving of management’s close attention.

Special Mention: Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard: Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Impaired: A loan is considered impaired, when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.

Additionally, all loans classified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) are considered impaired. Purchased credit impaired loans are not considered impaired loans for these purposes.

Loans listed as pass include larger non-homogeneous loans not meeting the risk rating definitions above and smaller, homogeneous loans not assessed on an individual basis.

Based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows as of:

 

13

---

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 – UNAUDITED

 

Impaired loans evaluated individually and any related allowance is as follows as of:

 

The weighted average annualized average balance of the recorded investment for impaired loans, beginning from when the loan became impaired, and any interest income recorded on impaired loans after they became impaired is as follows for the:

 

There was no interest income recognized on a cash basis in either 2014 or 2013 on impaired loans.

 

NOTE 6: DEPOSITS

The following table summarizes the outstanding balance of deposits and average rates paid thereon as of:

 

14

---

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 – UNAUDITED

 

At June 30, 2014, of the $246.8 million of certificates of deposits of $100,000 or more, $233.6 million mature within one year and $13.2 million mature after one year. Of the $15.3 million of certificates of deposit of less than $100,000, $14.2 million mature within one year and $1.1 million mature after one year. At December 31, 2013, of the $229.9 million of certificates of deposits of $100,000 or more, $207.7 million mature within one year and $22.2 million mature after one year. Of the $15.9 million of certificates of deposit of less than $100,000, $13.6 million mature within one year and $2.3 million mature after one year.

 

NOTE 7: BORROWINGS

At June 30, 2014, our borrowings consisted of $187.0 million of overnight FHLB advances and a $21.3 million note payable by FFI. At December 31, 2013, our borrowings consisted of $134.0 million of overnight FHLB advances and a $7.1 million note payable by FFI. The FHLB advances were paid in full in the early part of July 2014 and January 2014, respectively, and bore interest rates of 0.18% and 0.06%, respectively. Because the Bank utilizes overnight borrowings, the balance of outstanding borrowings fluctuates on a daily basis.  

In the second quarter of 2013, FFI entered into a loan agreement to borrow $7.5 million for a term of five years. This note bears interest at a rate of ninety day Libor plus 4.0% per annum. In the first quarter of 2014, FFI entered into an amendment to this loan agreement pursuant to which we obtained an additional $15,000,000 of borrowings. As a result, as of June 30, 2014, the outstanding principal amount of the loan was $21,278,000. The First Amendment did not alter any of the terms of the Loan Agreement or the loan, other than the $15,000,000 increase in the principal amount of the loan and a corresponding increase in the amount of the monthly installments of principal and interest payable on the loan. The amended loan agreement requires us to make monthly payments of principal of $0.2 million plus interest, with a final payment of the unpaid principal balance, in the amount of approximately $12.1 million, plus accrued but unpaid interest, at the maturity date of the loan in May 2018. We have the right, in our discretion, to prepay the loan at any time in whole or, from time to time, in part, without any penalties or premium. We are required to meet certain financial covenants during the term of the loan, with which we were in compliance at June 30, 2014. As security for our repayment of the loan, we pledged all of the common stock of FFB to the lender.

 

 

NOTE 8: EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock that would then share in earnings. The following table sets forth the Company’s unaudited earnings per share calculations for the periods indicated:

 

 

Based on a weighted average basis, options to purchase 65,375 shares of common stock were excluded for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.  As of June 30, 2014, FFI had accrued $0.7 million related to contingent consideration to be paid to shareholders of an acquired company. Per the merger agreement, this contingent consideration is to be paid in shares of common stock of FFI based on an assigned value of $15.00 per share. Based on this per share price, the number of dilutive shares related to this contingent consideration is 43,333 as of June 30, 2014.

 

15

---

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 – UNAUDITED

 

 

Based on a weighted average basis, options to purchase 65,748 and 312,194 shares of common stock were excluded for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.  As of June 30, 2014, FFI had accrued $0.7 million related to contingent consideration to be paid to shareholders of an acquired company. Per the merger agreement, this contingent consideration is to be paid in shares of common stock of FFI based on an assigned value of $15.00 per share. Based on this per share price, the number of dilutive shares related to this contingent consideration is 43,333 as of June 30, 2014.

 

 

NOTE 9: SEGMENT REPORTING

For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company had two reportable business segments: Banking (FFB) and Wealth Management (FFA). The results of FFI and any elimination entries are included in the column labeled Other. The following tables show key operating results for each of our business segments used to arrive at our consolidated totals for the following periods:

 

 

16

---

FIRST FOUNDATION INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 – UNAUDITED

 

 

 

 

 

17

---

 

The following discussion and analysis is intended to facilitate the understanding and assessment of significant changes and trends in our results of operations in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to our results of operations in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013; and our financial condition at June 30, 2014 as compared to our financial condition at December 31, 2013. This discussion and analysis is based on and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report and our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013, and the notes thereto, which are set forth in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K (our “2013 10-K”) which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (or SEC) on March 25, 2014.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this report that are not historical facts or that discuss our expectations, beliefs or views regarding our future financial performance or future financial condition, or financial or other trends in our business or in the markets in which we operate, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts.  Often, they include words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “forecast” or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” or “may.”  Such forward-looking statements are based on current information that is available to us, and on assumptions that we make, about future events or economic or financial conditions or trends over which we do not have control.  In addition, our businesses and the markets in which we operate are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties.  Those risks and uncertainties, and unexpected future events, could cause our financial condition or actual operating results in the future to differ, possibly significantly, from our expected financial condition and operating results that are set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this report.

The principal risks and uncertainties to which our businesses are subject are discussed in Item 1A in our 2013 10-K and in this Item 2 below.  Therefore, you are urged to read not only the information contained in this Item 2, but also the risk factors and other cautionary information contained in Item 1A of our 2013 10-K, which qualify the forward-looking statements contained in this report.

Due to these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this report and not to make predictions about our future financial performance based solely on our historical financial performance. We also disclaim any obligation to update forward-looking statements contained in this Report or in our 2013 10-K or any other of our filings previously made with the SEC, except as may otherwise be required by applicable law or government regulations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and accounting practices in the banking industry. Certain of those accounting policies are considered critical accounting policies, because they require us to make estimates and assumptions regarding circumstances or trends that could materially affect the value of those assets, such as economic conditions or trends that could impact our ability to fully collect our loans or ultimately realize the carrying value of certain of our other assets. Those estimates and assumptions are made based on current information available to us regarding those economic conditions or trends or other circumstances. If changes were to occur in the events, trends or other circumstances on which our estimates or assumptions were based, or other unanticipated events were to occur that might affect our operations, we may be required under GAAP to adjust our earlier estimates and to reduce the carrying values of the affected assets on our balance sheet, generally by means of charges against income, which could also affect our results of operations in the fiscal periods when those charges are recognized.

Utilization and Valuation of Deferred Income Tax Benefits. We record as a “deferred tax asset” on our balance sheet an amount equal to the tax credit and tax loss carryforwards and tax deductions (collectively “tax benefits”) that we believe will be available to us to offset or reduce income taxes in future periods. Under applicable federal and state income tax laws and regulations, tax benefits related to tax loss carryforwards will expire if they cannot be used within specified periods of time. Accordingly, the ability to fully use our deferred tax asset related to tax loss carryforwards to reduce income taxes in the future depends on the amount of taxable income that we generate during those time periods. At least once each year, or more frequently, if warranted, we make estimates of future taxable income that we believe we are likely to generate during those future periods. If we conclude, on the basis of those estimates and the amount of the tax benefits available to us, that it is more likely, than not, that we will be able to fully utilize those tax benefits prior to their expiration, we recognize the deferred tax asset in full on our balance sheet. On the other hand, if we conclude on the basis of those estimates and the amount of the tax benefits available to us that it has become more likely, than not, that we will be unable to utilize those tax benefits in full prior to their expiration, then, we would establish a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax asset on our balance sheet to the amount with respect to which we believe it is still more likely, than not, that we will be able to use to offset or reduce taxes in the future. The establishment of such a valuation allowance, or any increase in an existing

18

---

 

valuation allowance, would be effectuated through a charge to the provision for income taxes or a reduction in any income tax credit for the period in which such valuation allowance is established or increased.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses. Our ALLL is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense and may be reduced by a recapture of previously established loss reserves, which are also reflected in the statement of income. Loans are charged against the ALLL when management believes that collectability of the principal is unlikely. The ALLL is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb estimated losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible based on an evaluation of the collectability of loans and prior loan loss experience. This evaluation also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, current economic conditions and certain other subjective factors that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay. While we use the best information available to make this evaluation, future adjustments to our ALLL may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic or other conditions that can affect the collectability in full of loans in our loan portfolio.

Adoption of new or revised accounting standards. We have elected to take advantage of the extended transition period afforded by the Jumpstart our Business Startups Act of 2012 (or “JOBS Act”), for the implementation of new or revised accounting standards. As a result, we will not be required to comply with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies or we cease to be an “emerging growth” company as defined in the JOBS Act. As a result of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to the financials statements of companies that comply with public company effective dates.

We have two business segments, “Banking” and “Investment Management, Wealth Planning and Consulting” (“Wealth Management”). Banking includes the operations of FFB and FFIS and Wealth Management includes the operations of FFA. The financial position and operating results of the stand-alone holding company, FFI, are included under the caption “Other” in certain of the tables that follow, along with any consolidation elimination entries.

Recent Developments and Overview

In the second quarter of 2013, we entered into a loan agreement to borrow $7.5 million for a term of five years. This note bears interest at a rate of ninety day Libor plus 4.0% per annum. In the first quarter of 2014, we entered into an amendment to this loan agreement pursuant to which we obtained an additional $15,000,000 of borrowings. As a result, as of June 30, 2014, the outstanding principal amount of the loan was $21,278,000. This amendment did not alter any of the terms of the loan agreement or the loan, other than the $15,000,000 increase in the principal amount of the loan and a corresponding increase in the amount of the monthly installments of principal and interest payable on the loan. The amended loan agreement requires us to make monthly payments of principal of $0.2 million plus interest, with a final payment of the unpaid principal balance, in the amount of approximately $12.1 million, plus accrued but unpaid interest, at the maturity date of the loan in May 2018. We have the right, in our discretion, to prepay the loan at any time in whole or, from time to time, in part, without any penalties or premium. We are required to meet certain financial covenants during the term of the loan. As security for our repayment of the loan, we pledged all of the common stock of FFB to the lender.

We have continued to grow both our Banking and Wealth Management operations. Comparing the first six months of 2014 to the first six months of 2013, we have increased our revenues (net interest income and noninterest income) by 15%. This growth in revenues is the result of the growth in Banking’s total interest-earning assets and the growth in Wealth Management’s assets under management (or “AUM”). During the first six months of 2014, total loans and total deposits in Banking increased 12% and 7%, respectively, while the AUM in Wealth Management increased by $352 million or 14% and totaled $2.95 billion as of June 30, 2014. The growth in AUM includes the addition of $258 million of net new accounts and $158 million of gains realized in client accounts during the first six months of 2014.

The results of operations for Banking and Wealth Management reflect the benefits of this growth. Income before taxes for Banking increased $1.6 million from $6.4 million in the first six months of 2013 to $8.0 million in the first six months of 2014. Income before taxes for Wealth Management increased $0.6 million from a loss before taxes of $0.5 million in the first six months of 2013 to income before taxes of $0.1 million in the first six months of 2014. On a consolidated basis, our earnings before taxes increased from $4.7 million in the first six months of 2013 to $4.9 million in the first six months of 2014. During the second quarter of 2014, we expensed $1.0 million of costs related to an initial public offering (“IPO”) that we cancelled. If that IPO had been completed, rather than cancelled, these costs would have been netted against the gross proceeds of the offering and not recorded as an expense.

Results of Operations

Our net income for the quarter and and six months ending June 30, 2014 was $1.3 million and $2.7 million, respectively as compared to $1.9 million and $2.9 million for the corresponding periods in 2013. Income before taxes for the quarter and six months ending June 30, 2014 was $2.4 million and $4.9 million, respectively as compared to $3.0 million and $4.7 million for the

19

---

 

corresponding periods in 2013. The effective tax rate increased to 44.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to 38.0% in the corresponding period in 2013 due in large part to the elimination of certain credits under California tax laws.

The primary sources of revenue for Banking are net interest income, fees from its deposits, trust and insurance services, and certain loan fees. The primary sources of revenue for Wealth Management are asset management fees assessed on the balance of AUM and fees charged for consulting and administrative services. Compensation and benefit costs, which represent the largest component of noninterest expense accounted for 60% and 77%, respectively, of the total noninterest expense for Banking and Wealth Management in the first six months of 2014.

The following table shows key operating results for each of our business segments for the quarter ended June 30:

 

General. Consolidated income before taxes for the second quarter of 2014 was $2.4 million as compared to $3.0 million for the second quarter of 2013. This decrease was due to a $1.6 million increase in corporate interest and noninterest expenses, which was partially offset by increases in income before taxes of Banking and Wealth Management of $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The $0.7 million increase in income before taxes for Banking was due to higher net interest income, higher noninterest income and a lower provision for loan losses, which were partially offset by higher noninterest expenses. The $0.3 million increase in income before taxes for Wealth Management was primarily due to higher noninterest income.

The increase in corporate interest and noninterest expenses in the second quarter of 2014 as compared to the second quarter of 2013 was primarily due to a $0.2 million increase in interest costs related to the higher balance of the term note, the expensing of $1.0 million in IPO costs and $0.2 million of increased allocations of executive compensation related to the time spent on the IPO.

 

The following table shows key operating results for each of our business segments for the six months ended June 30:

 

20

---

 

 

General. Consolidated income before taxes for the first six months of 2014 was $4.9 million as compared to $4.7 million for the first six months of 2013. This increase was due to increases in income before taxes for Banking and Wealth Management of $1.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively, which were partially offset by a $2.0 million increase in corporate interest and noninterest expenses. The $1.6 million increase in income before taxes for Banking was due to higher net interest income, higher noninterest income and a lower provision for loan losses, which were partially offset by higher noninterest expenses. For Wealth Management, a $0.5 million loss before taxes in the first six months of 2013 improved to income before taxes of $0.1 million for the first six months of 2014 due to higher noninterest income which was partially offset by higher noninterest expenses.

The increase in corporate interest and noninterest expenses in the first six months of 2014 as compared to the corresponding period in 2013 was primarily due to a $0.3 million increase in interest costs related to the higher balance of the term loan, the expensing of $1.0 million in IPO costs and $0.3 million of increased allocations of executive compensation related to the time spent on the IPO.

Net Interest Income. The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, information regarding (i) the total dollar amount of interest income from interest-earning assets and the resultant average yields on those assets; (ii) the total dollar amount of interest expense and the average rate of interest on our interest-bearing liabilities; (iii) net interest income; (iv) net interest rate spread; and (v) net yield on interest-earning assets:

 

 

21

---

 

 

Net interest income is impacted by the volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), interest rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume) and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table provides a breakdown of the changes in net interest income due to volume and rate changes for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, as compared to corresponding periods in 2013:

 

22

---

 

 

Net interest income increased 3% from $9.5 million in the second quarter of 2013, to $9.8 million in the second quarter of 2014 because of a 28% increase in interest-earning assets, which was partially offset by a decrease in our net interest rate spread and by $0.8 million of interest income we realized in the second quarter of 2013 on the net recovery of mark to mark adjustments related to payoffs of acquired loans. Excluding this net recovery, the yield on interest earnings assets for the second quarter of 2013 would have been 4.43%, the net interest rate spread would have been 3.87% and the net yield on interest earnings assets would have been 4.02%. Excluding the net recovery in 2013, the decrease in the net interest rate spread from 3.87% for the second quarter of 2013 to 3.42% for the second quarter of 2014 was due to a decrease in yield on total interest earning assets. Excluding the net recovery in 2013, the decrease in yield on interest earning assets from 4.43% to 3.97% was due to an increase in the proportion of lower yielding securities to total interest earning assets and a decrease in the yield on loans. The decrease in yield on loans was due to prepayments of higher yielding loans and the addition of loans at current market rates which are lower than the current yield on our loan portfolio. The rate on interest bearing liabilities did not change as a decrease in the rates paid on interest bearing deposits was offset by an increase in the rates paid on borrowings. The decrease in rates paid on deposits was due to lower market rates while the increase in the rates paid on borrowings was primarily due to the higher proportion of borrowings being from the term loan which bears interest at ninety day Libor plus 4.0% per annum as compared to the FHLB weighted average borrowing rate of 0.13% during the second quarter of 2014.

Net interest income increased 11% from $17.7 million in the first six months of 2013, to $19.6 million in the first six months of 2014 because of a 30% increase in interest-earning assets, which was partially offset by a decrease in our net interest rate spread and by $0.8 million of interest income we realized in the second quarter of 2013 on the net recovery of mark to mark adjustments related to payoffs of acquired loans. Excluding this net recovery, the yield on interest earnings assets for the first six months of 2013 would have been 4.50%, the net interest rate spread would have been 3.94% and the net yield on interest earnings assets would have been 4.09%. Excluding the net recovery in 2013, the decrease in the net interest rate spread from 3.94% for the first six months of 2013 to 3.52% for the first six months of 2014 was due to a decrease in yield on total interest earning assets which was partially offset by a decrease in rates paid on interest bearing liabilities. Excluding the net recovery in 2013, the decrease in yield on interest earning assets from 4.50% to 4.04% was due to an increase in the proportion of lower yielding securities to total interest earning assets and a decrease in the yield on loans. The decrease in yield on loans was due to prepayments of higher yielding loans and the addition of loans at current market rates which are lower than the current yield on our loan portfolio. The rate on interest bearing liabilities decreased as a decrease in the rate on interest bearing deposits was partially offset by an increase in the rate on borrowings. The decrease in rates paid on deposits was due to lower market rates while the increase in the rates paid on borrowings was primarily due to the higher proportion of borrowings being from the term loan which bears interest at ninety day Libor plus 4.0% per annum as compared to the FHLB weighted average borrowing rate of 0.13% during the first six months of 2014.

Provision for loan losses. The provision for loan losses represents our determination of the amount necessary to be charged against the current period’s earnings to maintain the ALLL at a level that is considered adequate in relation to the estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The provision for loan losses is impacted by changes in loan balances as well as changes in estimated loss assumptions and charge-offs and recoveries. The amount of our provision also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, current economic conditions and certain other subjective factors that may affect the ability of borrowers to meet their repayment obligations to us. We did not record a provision for loan losses in the second quarter of 2014 and the provision for loan losses was $0.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $0.7 million and $1.3 million in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. The lower provision for loan losses in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2013 reflects reductions in estimated loss assumptions and the lower amount of chargeoffs. We did not recognize any chargeoffs in the first six months of 2014, as compared to the $0.7 million of chargeoffs we recognized in the first six months of 2013.

23

---

 

Noninterest income. Noninterest income for Banking includes fees charged to clients for trust services and deposit services, prepayment and late fees charged on loans and insurance commissions. The following table provides a breakdown of noninterest income for Banking for the quarter and six months ended June 30:

 

The $0.8 million increase in noninterest income for Banking in the second quarter of 2014 as compared to the second quarter of 2013 was due primarily to a $0.7 million gain on sale of REO realized in the second quarter of 2014. The $1.1 million increase in noninterest income for Banking in the first six months of 2014 as compared to the corresponding period in 2013 was due primarily to the $0.7 million gain on sale of REO and a $0.3 million increase in insurance commissions. The increase in insurance commissions reflects a higher level of large dollar cases closed in the first six months of 2014 as compared to the corresponding period in 2013.

Noninterest income for Wealth Management includes fees charged to high net-worth clients for managing their assets and for providing financial planning consulting services, as well as fees for administration services provided to family foundations and private charitable organizations. The following table provides a breakdown of noninterest income for Wealth Management for the quarter and six months ended June 30:

 

 

The $0.4 million increase in noninterest income in Wealth Management in the second quarter of 2014 as compared to the second quarter of 2013 was primarily due to increases in asset management fees of 14%. The $1.2 million increase in noninterest income in Wealth Management in the first six months of 2014 as compared to the corresponding period in 2013 was primarily due to increases in asset management fees of 18%. These increases in asset management fees were primarily due to 18% and 17% increases in the AUM balances used for computing the asset management fees in the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2014, respectively, as compared to AUM balances used for computing the asset management fees in the corresponding periods in 2013.

24

---

 

Noninterest Expense. The following table provides a breakdown of noninterest expense for Banking and Wealth Management for the quarter and six months ended June 30:

 

 

The $1.4 million increase in noninterest expense in Banking in the second quarter of 2014 as compared to the second quarter of 2013 was due primarily to increases in staffing and costs associated with FFB’s higher balances of loans and deposits and our continuing expansion. Compensation and benefits for Banking increased $0.6 million during in the second quarter of 2014 as compared to the second quarter of 2013 as the number of full-time equivalent employees, (“FTE”) in Banking increased to 140.5 during the second quarter of 2014 from 121.5 during the second quarter of 2013. The $0.2 million increase in occupancy and depreciation costs for Banking in the second quarter of 2014 as compared to the second quarter of 2013 was due to one additional office being open during the second quarter of 2014 as compared to the second quarter of 2013 and the expansion into additional space at the administrative office in the second quarter of 2013. The combined $0.5 million increase in professional services and marketing and other expenses in the second quarter of 2014 as compared to the second quarter of 2013, was primarily due to a $0.7 million provision related to contingent consideration to the former shareholders of an acquired company recorded during the second quarter of 2014, which was partially offset by the lack of a provision for REO losses in the second quarter of 2014 as compared to a $0.2 million provision for REO losses in the second quarter of 2013.    

 

The $2.7 million increase in noninterest expense in Banking in the first six months of 2014 as compared to the corresponding period in 2013 was due primarily to increases in staffing and costs associated with FFB’s higher balances of loans and deposits and our continuing expansion. Compensation and benefits for Banking increased $1.3 million during in the first six months of 2014 as compared to the corresponding period in 2013 as the number of FTE in Banking increased to 138.4 during the first six months of 2014 from 117.2 during the corresponding period in 2013. The $0.6 million increase in occupancy and depreciation costs for Banking in the first six months of 2014 as compared to the corresponding period in 2013 was due to one additional office being open during the first six months of 2014 as compared to the corresponding period in 2013 and the expansion into additional space at the administrative office in the second quarter of 2013. The combined $0.8 million increase in professional services and marketing and other expenses in the first six months of 2014 as compared to the corresponding period in 2013 was primarily due to the $0.7 million provision related to contingent consideration to be paid to the shareholders of an acquired company and increased costs related to our larger loan and deposit balances, increased staffing and increased number of wealth management offices which was partially offset by the lack of a provision for REO losses in the first six months of 2014 as compared to a $0.2 million provision for REO losses in the first six months of 2013.     

Noninterest expense in Wealth Management only increased $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2014 as compared to the second quarter of 2013 as there were no significant changes in staffing levels, the primary component of noninterest expenses for Wealth Management. Noninterest expenses in Wealth Management increased $0.6 million in the first six months of 2014 as compared to the corresponding period in 2013 primarily due to increases in staffing and costs associated with our continuing expansion and growth. Compensation and benefits for Wealth Management increased $0.5 million in the first six months of 2014 as compared to the corresponding period in 2013 as the number of FTE in Wealth Management increased to 54.0 during the first six months of 2014 from 51.8 during the corresponding period in 2013.

25

---

 

Financial Condition

The following table shows the financial position for each of our business segments, and of FFI and elimination entries used to arrive at our consolidated totals which are included in the column labeled Other, as of:

 

Our consolidated balance sheet is primarily affected by changes occurring in our Banking operations as our Wealth Management operations do not maintain significant levels of assets. Banking has experienced and is expected to continue to experience increases in its total assets as a result of our growth strategy.

During the first six months of 2014, total assets for the Company and FFB increased by $127.0 million. For FFB, during the first six months of 2014, loans and deposits increased $104.3 million and $57.0 million, respectively, cash and cash equivalents decreased by $37.5 million, securities AFS increased by $59.2 million and FHLB advances increased by $53.0 million. Borrowings at FFI increased by $14.2 million during the first six months of 2014.

Cash and cash equivalents, certificates of deposit and securities. Cash and cash equivalents, which primarily consist of funds held at the Federal Reserve Bank or at correspondent banks, including fed funds, decreased $37.5 million during the first six months of 2014. Changes in cash equivalents are primarily affected by the funding of loans, investments in securities, and changes in our sources of funding: deposits, FHLB advances and FFI borrowings. As the Company has increased its securities portfolio for liquidity purposes, it has been able to reduce the amount of cash held on its balance sheet.

26

---

 

Securities available for sale. The following table provides a summary of the Company’s AFS securities portfolio as of:

 

The US Treasury securities are pledged as collateral to the State of California to meet regulatory requirements related to FFB’s trust operations.

The $59.2 million increase in AFS securities during in the first six months of 2014 reflected our actions to increase our on-balance sheet sources of liquidity.

The scheduled maturities of securities AFS, other than agency mortgage-backed securities, and the related weighted average yield is as follows as of June 30, 2014:

 

Agency mortgage backed securities are excluded from the above table because such securities are not due at a single maturity date. The weighted average yield of the agency mortgage backed securities as of June 30, 2014 was 2.49%.

Loans. The following table sets forth our loans, by loan category, as of:

 

The $104.2 million increase in loans during the first six months of 2014 was the result of loan originations and funding of existing credit commitments of $239.5 million, offset by $135.3 million of payoffs and scheduled principal payments.

27

---

 

The scheduled maturities, as of December 31, 2013, of the performing loans categorized as land loans and as commercial and industrial loans, are as follows:

 

Deposits. The following table sets forth information with respect to our deposits and the average rates paid on deposits, as of:

 

The $55.1 million increase in deposits during the first six months of 2014 reflects the organic growth of our Banking operations.

As market interest rates have continued to decline, FFB has been able to lower the cost of its deposit products. As a result, the weighted average rate of interest-bearing deposits has decreased from 0.65% at December 31, 2012 to 0.55% at December 31, 2013, to 0.53% at June 30, 2014, while the weighted average interest rates of both interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposits have decreased from 0.52% at December 31, 2012 to 0.40% at both December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014.

The maturities of our certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more were as follows as of June 30, 2014:

 

FFB utilizes a third party program called CDARs which allows FFB to transfer funds of its clients in excess of the FDIC insurance limit (currently $250,000) to other institutions in exchange for an equal amount of funds from clients of these other institutions. This has allowed FFB to provide FDIC insurance coverage to its clients. As of June 30, 2014, FFB held $85.7 million of CDARs deposits. Under certain regulatory guidelines, these deposits are considered brokered deposits. As of June 30, 2014, FFB did not have any other brokered certificates of deposit.

Borrowings. At June 30, 2014, our borrowings consisted of $187.0 million of overnight FHLB advances at FFB and a $21.3 million term loan at FFI. At December 31, 2013, our borrowings consisted of $134.0 million of overnight FHLB advances at FFB and a $7.1 million term loan at FFI. The FHLB advances were paid in full in the early parts of July 2014 and January 2014, respectively. Because FFB utilizes overnight borrowings, the balance of outstanding borrowings fluctuates on a daily basis. The average balance of overnight borrowings during the first six months of 2014 was $150.3 million, as compared to $79.2 million during 2013. The weighted average interest rate on these overnight borrowings was 0.13% for the second quarter of 2014, as compared to 0.15% during 2013. The maximum amount of overnight borrowings outstanding at any month-end during the first six months of 2014 and during 2013, was $195.0 million and $134.0 million, respectively.

28

---

 

Term Loan. In the second quarter of 2013, we entered into a loan agreement to borrow $7.5 million for a term of five years. This note bears interest at a rate of ninety day Libor plus 4.0% per annum. In the first quarter of 2014, we entered into an amendment to this loan agreement pursuant to which we obtained an additional $15.0 million of borrowings. As a result, as of June 30, 2014, the outstanding principal amount of the loan was $21.3 million. This amendment did not alter any of the terms of the loan agreement or the loan, other than the $15.0 million increase in the principal amount of the loan and a corresponding increase in the amount of the monthly installments of principal and interest payable on the Loan. The amended loan agreement requires us to make monthly payments of principal of $0.2 million plus interest, with a final payment of the unpaid principal balance, in the amount of approximately $12.1 million, plus accrued but unpaid interest, at the maturity date of the loan in May 2018. We have the right, in our discretion, to prepay all or a portion of the loan at any time, without any penalties or premium. We have pledged all of the common stock of FFB to the lender as security for the performance of our payment and other obligations under the loan agreement. The loan agreement obligates us to meet certain financial covenants, including the following:

As of June 30, 2014, we were in compliance with all of those financial covenants.

The loan agreement also prohibits FFI (but not FFB or FFA) from doing any of the following without the lender’s prior approval: (i) paying any cash dividends to our shareholders, (ii) incurring any other indebtedness, (iii) granting any security interests or permitting the imposition of any liens, other than certain permitted liens, on any of FFI’s assets, or (iv) entering into significant merger or acquisition transactions outside of our banking operations. The loan agreement provides that if we fail to pay principal or interest when due, or we commit a breach of any of our other obligations or covenants in the loan agreement, or certain events occur that adversely affect us, then, unless we are able to cure such a breach, we will be deemed to be in default of the loan agreement and the lender will become entitled to require us to immediately pay in full the then principal amount of and all unpaid interest on the loan. If in any such event we fail to repay the loan and all accrued but unpaid interest, then the lender would become entitled to sell our FFB shares which we pledged as security for the loan in order to recover the amounts owed to it.

29

---

 

Delinquent Loans, Nonperforming Assets and Provision for Credit Losses

Loans are considered past due following the date when either interest or principal is contractually due and unpaid. Loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued are designated as nonaccrual loans. Accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when reasonable doubt exists as to the full, timely collection of interest or principal and, generally, when a loan becomes contractually past due for 90 days or more with respect to principal or interest. However, the accrual of interest may be continued on a well-secured loan contractually past due 90 days or more with respect to principal or interest if the loan is in the process of collection or collection of the principal and interest is deemed probable. The following tables provide a summary of past due and nonaccrual loans as of:

 

As of June 30, 2014, the Company had $0.1 million of loans classified as troubled debt restructurings, which are included as nonaccrual loans in the table above.

30

---

 

The following is a breakdown of our loan portfolio by the risk category of loans as of:

 

As of June 30, 2014, $5.9 million of the loans classified as substandard and $1.0 million of the loans classified as impaired were loans acquired in an acquisition.

We consider a loan to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, we believe that it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. We measure impairment using either the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or the fair value of the properties collateralizing the loan. Impairment losses are included in the allowance for loan losses through a charge to provision for loan losses. Adjustments to impairment losses due to changes in the fair value of the property collateralizing an impaired loan are considered in computing the provision for loan losses. Loans collectively reviewed for impairment include all loans except for loans which are individually reviewed based on specific criteria, such as delinquency, debt coverage, adequacy of collateral and condition of property collateralizing the loans. Impaired loans include nonaccrual loans (excluding those collectively reviewed for impairment), certain restructured loans and certain performing loans less than ninety days delinquent (“other impaired loans”) which we believe are not likely to be collected in accordance with contractual terms of the loans.

In 2012, we purchased loans, for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected. The carrying amount of these purchased credit impaired loans is as follows as of:

 

31

---

 

 Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table summarizes the activity in our ALLL for the periods indicated:

 

Excluding the loans acquired in an acquisition, our ALLL as a percentage of total loans was 1.03%, and 1.16% as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

The amount of the ALLL is adjusted periodically by charges to operations (referred to in our income statement as the “provision for loan losses”) (i) to replenish the ALLL after it has been reduced due to loan write-downs or charge-offs, (ii) to reflect increases in the volume of outstanding loans, and (iii) to take account of changes in the risk of potential loan losses due to a deterioration in the condition of borrowers or in the value of property securing non–performing loans or adverse changes in economic conditions. The amounts of the provisions we make for loan losses are based on our estimate of losses in our loan portfolio. In estimating such losses, we use economic and loss migration models that are based on bank regulatory guidelines and industry standards, and our historical charge-off experience and loan delinquency rates, local and national economic conditions, a borrower’s ability to repay its borrowings, and the value of any property collateralizing the loan, as well as a number of subjective factors. However, these determinations involve judgments about changes and trends in current economic conditions and other events that can affect the ability of borrowers to meet their loan obligations to us and a weighting among the quantitative and qualitative factors we consider in determining the sufficiency of the ALLL. Moreover, the duration and anticipated effects of prevailing economic conditions or trends can be uncertain and can be affected by a number of risks and circumstances that are outside of our control. If changes in economic or market conditions or unexpected subsequent events were to occur, or if changes were made to bank regulatory guidelines or industry standards that are used to assess the sufficiency of the ALLL, it could become necessary for us to incur additional, and possibly significant, charges to increase the ALLL, which would have the effect of reducing our income.

In addition, the FDIC and the California Department of Business Oversight (or “DBO”), as an integral part of their examination processes, periodically review the adequacy of our ALLL. These agencies may require us to make additional provisions for loan losses, over and above the provisions that we have already made, the effect of which would be to reduce our income.

32

---

 

The following table presents the balance in the ALLL and the recorded investment in loans by impairment method as of:

 

 

The column labeled “Unaccreted Credit Component Other Loans” represents the amount of unaccreted credit component discount for loans acquired in an acquisition  that were not classified as purchased impaired or individually evaluated for impairment as of the dates indicated, and the stated principal balance of the related loans. The unaccreted credit component discount is equal to 1.06% and 1.23% of the stated principal balance of these loans as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. In addition to this unaccreted credit component discount, an additional $0.2 million of the ALLL has been provided for these loans as of June 30, 2014.

Liquidity

Liquidity management focuses on our ability to generate, on a timely and cost-effective basis, cash sufficient to meet the funding needs of current loan demand, deposit withdrawals, principal and interest payments with respect to outstanding borrowings and to pay operating expenses. Our liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of funds management. Liquid assets are generally invested in marketable securities or held as cash at the FRB or other financial institutions.

33

---

 

We monitor our liquidity in accordance with guidelines established by our Board of Directors and applicable regulatory requirements. Our need for liquidity is affected by our loan activity, net changes in deposit levels and the maturities of our borrowings. The principal sources of our liquidity consist of deposits, loan interest and principal payments and prepayments, investment management and consulting fees, FHLB advances and proceeds from borrowings and sales of shares by FFI. The remaining balances of the Company’s lines of credit available to draw down totaled $193.4 million at June 30, 2014.

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, operating activities provided net cash of $3.4 million, comprised primarily of our net income of $2.7 million and $1.8 million of non-cash charges, including provisions for loan losses, stock based compensation expense and depreciation and amortization and deferred taxes recognized in our net income. These were partially offset by a $0.7 million gain on sale of a REO property recognized in our net income. During the year ended December 31, 2013 operating activities provided net cash of $11.2 million, comprised primarily of our net income of $7.9 million and $4.3 million of non-cash charges, including provisions for loan losses, REO losses, stock based compensation expense and depreciation and amortization, offset by $1.3 million non-cash deferred tax benefit recognized in our net income.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, investing activities used net cash of $163.3 million, primarily to fund a $105.7 million net increase in loans and a $58.2 million net increase in securities AFS. During the year ended December 31, 2013, investing activities used net cash of $217.0 million, primarily to fund a $160.8 million net increase in loans and a $56.1 million net increase in securities AFS.

Cash Flow Provided by Financing Activities. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, financing activities provided net cash of $122.3 million, consisting primarily of a net increase of $55.1 million in deposits, a $15.0 million borrowing under a term note, and a $53.0 million increase in FHLB advances. During the year ended December 31, 2013, financing activities provided net cash of $199.7 million, consisting primarily of a net increase of $152.3 million in deposits, a net increase of $41.1 million in borrowings and $6.3 million received from the sale of shares in a private offering.

Ratio of Loans to Deposits. The relationship between gross loans and total deposits can provide a useful measure of a bank’s liquidity. Since repayment of loans tends to be less predictable than the maturity of investments and other liquid resources, the higher the loan-to-deposit ratio the less liquid are our assets. On the other hand, since we realize greater yields on loans than we do on other interest-earning assets, a lower loan-to-deposit ratio can adversely affect interest income and earnings. As a result, our goal is to achieve a loan-to-deposit ratio that appropriately balances the requirements of liquidity and the need to generate a fair return on our assets. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the loan-to-deposit ratios at FFB were 115.1% and 110.4%, respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The following table provides the off-balance sheet arrangements of the Company as of June 30, 2014:

 

Some of the commitments to fund existing loans, lines of credit and letters of credit are expected to expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. As of June 30, 2014, FFB was obligated on $68.5 million of letters of credit to the FHLB which were being used as collateral for public fund deposits, including $56.0 million of deposits from the State of California.

Capital Resources and Dividend Policy

Under federal banking regulations that apply to all United States based bank holding companies and federally insured banks, the Company (on a consolidated basis) and FFB (on a stand-alone basis) must meet specific capital adequacy requirements that, for the most part, involve quantitative measures, primarily in terms of the ratios of their capital to their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items, calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Under those regulations, which are based primarily on those quantitative measures, each bank holding company must meet a minimum capital ratio and each federally insured bank is determined by its primary federal bank regulatory agency to come within one of the following capital adequacy categories on the basis of its capital ratios: (i) well capitalized; (ii) adequately capitalized; (iii) undercapitalized; (iv) significantly undercapitalized; or (v) critically undercapitalized.

Certain qualitative assessments also are made by a banking institution’s primary federal regulatory agency that could lead the agency to determine that the banking institution should be assigned to a lower capital category than the one indicated by the quantitative measures used to assess the institution’s capital adequacy. At each successive lower capital category, a banking institution is subject to greater operating restrictions and increased regulatory supervision by its federal bank regulatory agency.

34

---

 

The following table sets forth the capital and capital ratios of FFI (on a consolidated basis) and FFB as of the respective dates indicated below, as compared to the respective regulatory requirements applicable to them:

 

As of each of the dates set forth in the above table, the Company (on a consolidated basis) exceeded the minimum required capital ratios applicable to it and FFB (on a stand-alone basis) qualified as a well-capitalized depository institution under the capital adequacy guidelines described above. As a condition of approval of an acquisition by the FDIC, FFB is required to maintain a Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of 8.5% through August 15, 2014.

As of June 30, 2014, the amount of capital at FFB in excess of amounts required to be Well Capitalized was $43.4 million for the Tier 1 Leverage Ratio, $53.7 million for the Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and $32.9 million for the Total risk-based capital ratio. No conditions or events have occurred since June 30, 2014 which we believe have changed FFI’s or FFB’s capital adequacy classifications from those set forth in the above table.

The Federal Reserve Board and  the FDIC have adopted a final rule that revises their risk-based and leverage capital requirements (referred to as the Basel III rule).  A key goal of the Basel III rule is to strengthen the capital resources of banking organizations during normal and challenging business environments.  The Basel III final rule implements a revised definition of regulatory capital, a new common equity Tier 1 minimum capital requirement and a higher minimum Tier 1 capital requirement.  In the case of the Company and the Bank, compliance with the standardized approach for determining risk-weighted assets and compliance with the transition period for the revised minimum regulatory capital ratios will begin on January 1, 2015.  The transition period for the capital conservation buffer will begin on January 1, 2016 and the fully implemented regulatory capital ratios will become effective on January 1, 2019.  Important elements of the Basel III rule include the following:

35

---

 

Based on the final Basel III rule, we expect that our capital ratios and those of the Bank will exceed the requirements of the Basel III rules that will become applicable to them on January 1, 2015.

During the first six months of 2014, and during 2013, FFI made capital contributions to FFB of $10.0 million and $8.5 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2014, FFI had $10.1 million of available capital and, therefore, has the ability and financial resources to contribute additional capital to FFB, if needed.

Due to the adoption in June 2013 of the Basel III capital guidelines by the FRB and the FDIC, effective beginning on January 1, 2015, FFI and FFB will be required to meet higher and more stringent capital requirements than those that currently exist.

We did not pay dividends in 2014 or 2013 and we have no plans to pay dividends at least for the foreseeable future. Instead, it is our intention to retain internally generated cash flow to support our growth. Moreover, the payment of dividends is subject to certain regulatory restrictions. In addition, the agreement governing the term loan obtained by FFI in April 2013 provides that we must obtain the prior consent of the lender to pay dividends to our shareholders.

We had no material commitments for capital expenditures as of June 30, 2014.

 

 

 

36

---

 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any system of controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

In accordance with SEC rules, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness, as of June 30 2014, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2014, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

 

There have been no material changes in the risk factors that were disclosed in Item 1A, under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, which we filed with the Commission on March 25, 2014.

 

None.

 

 

 

37

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

38

---

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

S-1

---

 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

 

 

 

E-1