Document
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016
Commission file number 1-9924
Citigroup Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
52-1568099
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
388 Greenwich Street, New York, NY
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
10013
(Zip code)
(212) 559-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x    No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x  No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x
 
Accelerated filer o
 
Non-accelerated filer o
 (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No x
Number of shares of Citigroup Inc. common stock outstanding on September 30, 2016: 2,849,730,248

Available on the web at www.citigroup.com
 




CITIGROUP’S THIRD QUARTER 2016—FORM 10-Q
OVERVIEW
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND
  ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
  RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Executive Summary
Summary of Selected Financial Data
SEGMENT AND BUSINESS—INCOME (LOSS)
  AND REVENUES
SEGMENT BALANCE SHEET
CITICORP
Global Consumer Banking (GCB)
North America GCB
Latin America GCB
Asia GCB
Institutional Clients Group
Corporate/Other
CITI HOLDINGS
OFF-BALANCE SHEET
  ARRANGEMENTS
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Managing Global Risk Table of Contents
MANAGING GLOBAL RISK
INCOME TAXES
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND
  PROCEDURES
DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO SECTION 219 OF THE IRAN THREAT REDUCTION AND SYRIA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
  TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
  STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES, PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES, DIVIDENDS


1



OVERVIEW

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Citigroup’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, including the historical audited consolidated financial statements of Citigroup reflecting certain realignments and reclassifications set forth in Citigroup’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 17, 2016 (2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K), and Citigroup’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 (First Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q) and June 30, 2016 (Second Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q). Additional information about Citigroup is available on Citi’s website at www.citigroup.com. Citigroup’s recent annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, proxy statements, as well as other filings with the SEC, are available free of charge through Citi’s website by clicking on the “Investors” page and selecting “All SEC Filings.” The SEC’s website also contains current reports, information statements, and other information regarding Citi at www.sec.gov.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods’ financial statements and disclosures to conform to the current period’s presentation. For additional information on certain recent reclassifications, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Throughout this report, “Citigroup,” “Citi” and “the Company” refer to Citigroup Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.



2



Citigroup is managed pursuant to the following segments:citisegments3q2016.jpg
The following are the four regions in which Citigroup operates. The regional results are fully reflected in the segment results above.
citigroupregionsa06.jpg
(1)
Asia GCB includes the results of operations of GCB activities in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.
(2)
North America includes the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico, Latin America includes Mexico and Asia includes Japan.

3



MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Third Quarter of 2016—Solid Performance Across the Franchise
As described further throughout this Executive Summary, Citi reported solid operating results in the third quarter of 2016, reflecting underlying momentum across the franchise, notably in several businesses where Citi has been making investments.
In North America Global Consumer Banking (GCB), Citi’s ongoing investments in Citi-branded cards generated revenue growth, primarily reflecting the first full quarter of revenues from the acquisition of the Costco portfolio but also modest growth in average loans and purchase sales in the remainder of the portfolio. International GCB generated positive operating leverage driven by year-over-year growth in Mexico and Asia (excluding the impact of foreign currency translation into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes (FX translation) and the impact of a previously disclosed $160 million gain (excluding FX translation, $180 million as reported) related to the sale of Citi’s merchant acquiring business in Mexico in the third quarter of 2015). In Institutional Clients Group (ICG), Citi continued to support its clients around the world, generating year-over-year revenue growth in treasury and trade solutions, despite the continued low-interest rate environment, investment banking and fixed income markets, particularly in rates and currencies and spread products.
In Citicorp, loans increased 6% and deposits increased 5%. Excluding FX translation, Citicorp loans increased 7% and deposits increased 5%. (Citi’s results of operations excluding the impact of FX translation are non-GAAP financial measures.) Citi Holdings’ impact on Citi’s results of operations and financial condition decreased further with Citi Holdings constituting less than 2% of Citigroup’s net income in the current quarter and 3% of Citigroup’s GAAP assets as of the end of the third quarter of 2016. While Citi’s deferred tax assets (DTAs) were unchanged during the current quarter (for additional information, see “Income Taxes” below), year-to-date, Citi has utilized approximately $2.4 billion of its DTAs which contributed to a net increase of $3.2 billion of regulatory capital as fewer DTAs were deducted from regulatory capital.
In the third quarter of 2016, Citi began implementing its $10.4 billion capital plan (see “Executive Summary” in Citi’s Second Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q) and returned $3.0 billion of capital to common shareholders in the form of dividends and the repurchase of 56 million common shares. Outstanding common shares declined 2% from the prior-quarter and 4% from the prior-year period. Despite the increased return of capital to its shareholders, each of Citigroup’s key regulatory capital metrics remained strong as of the end of the third quarter of 2016 (see “Capital” below).
During the remainder of 2016, Citi expects that many of the uncertainties that have impacted the operating environment and macroeconomic conditions year-to-date will continue, including significant uncertainties arising from the vote in
 
favor of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union as well as the outlook for future rate increases in the U.S. For a more detailed discussion of these risks and uncertainties, see each respective business’ results of operations and “Forward-Looking Statements” below as well as the “Risk Factors” section in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Third Quarter of 2016 Summary Results

Citigroup
Citigroup reported net income of $3.8 billion, or $1.24 per share, compared to $4.3 billion, or $1.35 per share, in the prior-year period. Results in the third quarter of 2015 included $196 million ($127 million after-tax) of CVA/DVA.
Excluding the impact of CVA/DVA in the prior-year period, Citigroup reported net income of $3.8 billion in the third quarter of 2016, or $1.24 per share, compared to $4.2 billion, or $1.31 per share, in the prior-year period. (Citi’s results of operations excluding the impact of CVA/DVA are non-GAAP financial measures.) The 8% decrease from the prior-year period was primarily driven by lower revenues, partially offset by lower cost of credit and lower expenses.
Citi’s revenues were $17.8 billion in the third quarter of 2016, a decrease of 5% from the prior-year period driven by a 1% decline in Citicorp and a 48% decline in Citi Holdings. Excluding CVA/DVA in the third quarter of 2015, revenues were down 4% from the prior-year period, as a 49% decrease in Citi Holdings revenues was partially offset by a 1% increase in Citicorp revenues. Excluding CVA/DVA in the third quarter of 2015 and the impact of FX translation (which increased the reported decline in revenues versus the prior-year period by approximately $223 million), Citigroup revenues decreased 3% from the prior-year period, driven by a 49% decrease in Citi Holdings, partially offset by a 2% increase in Citicorp revenues versus the prior-year period.

Expenses
Citigroup expenses decreased 2% versus the prior-year period as lower expenses in Citi Holdings and a benefit from the impact of FX translation were partially offset by volume growth and ongoing investments in Citicorp (including those referenced above). FX translation increased the reported decline in expenses versus the prior-year period by approximately $194 million.
Citicorp expenses increased 3% reflecting volume growth as well as the ongoing investments in the franchise, partially offset by efficiency savings and the benefit from the impact of FX translation.
Citi Holdings’ expenses were $826 million, down 40% from the prior-year period, primarily driven by the ongoing decline in Citi Holdings assets.

Credit Costs
Citi’s total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims of $1.7 billion decreased 5% from the prior-year


4



period. The decrease was driven by a lower provision for benefits and claims due to lower insurance-related assets within Citi Holdings and a decrease in net credit losses, partially offset by a net loan loss reserve build, largely driven by North America cards within Citicorp, compared to a net loan loss reserve release in the prior-year period.
Net credit losses of $1.5 billion declined 8% versus the prior-year period. Consumer net credit losses declined 8% to $1.5 billion, mostly reflecting continued improvement in the North America mortgage portfolio and ongoing divestiture activity within Citi Holdings, partially offset by higher net credit losses in North America cards in Citicorp due to volume growth. Corporate net credit losses decreased 20% to $40 million and were largely offset by the release of previously established loan loss reserves (for additional information, see “Institutional Clients Group” and “Credit Risk—Corporate Credit” below).
The net build of allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments was $176 million in the third quarter of 2016, compared to a $16 million release in the prior-year period. Citicorp’s net reserve build was $298 million, compared to a net reserve build of $174 million in the prior-year period. The larger net reserve build in the third quarter of 2016 was primarily related to the North America cards franchise, driven by the impact of the Costco portfolio acquisition, volume growth and the estimated impact of newly proposed regulatory guidelines on third party debt collections (see “Global Consumer BankingNorth America GCB” below), partially offset by a net reserve release in ICG. The net reserve release in ICG largely reflected ratings upgrades, reductions in certain exposures and improved valuations. Citi’s credit quality largely remained favorable across the franchise during the current quarter.
Citi Holdings’ net reserve release decreased $68 million from the prior-year period to $122 million, primarily reflecting the impact of asset sales.
For additional information on Citi’s consumer (including commercial) and corporate credit costs and allowance for loan losses, see “Credit Risk” below.

Capital
Citigroup’s Tier 1 Capital and Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratios, on a fully implemented basis, were 14.2% and 12.6% as of September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to 12.9% and 11.7% as of September 30, 2015 (all based on the Basel III Advanced Approaches for determining risk-weighted assets). Citigroup’s Supplementary Leverage ratio as of September 30, 2016, on a fully implemented basis, was 7.4%, compared to 6.9% as of September 30, 2015. For additional information on Citi’s capital ratios and related components, including the impact of Citi’s DTAs on its capital ratios, see “Capital Resources” below.

Citicorp
Citicorp net income decreased 12% from the prior-year period to $3.8 billion. CVA/DVA, recorded in ICG, was $221 million ($143 million after-tax) in third quarter of 2015 (for a summary of CVA/DVA by business within ICG, see “Institutional Clients Group” below). Excluding CVA/DVA in
 
the third quarter of 2015, Citicorp’s net income decreased 9% from the prior-year period, primarily driven by the higher expenses and higher cost of credit, partially offset by higher revenues.
Citicorp revenues decreased 1% from the prior-year period to $16.9 billion, driven by lower revenues in Corporate/Other, partially offset by a 1% increase in GCB revenues. Excluding CVA/DVA in the third quarter of 2015, Citicorp revenues increased 1% from the prior-year period, driven by a 1% increase in GCB revenues and a 2% increase in ICG revenues. As referenced above, excluding CVA/DVA in the prior-year period and the impact of FX translation, Citicorp’s revenues increased 2% versus the prior-year period, as growth in the GCB and ICG franchises was partially offset by lower revenues in Corporate/Other.
GCB revenues of $8.2 billion increased 1% versus the prior-year period. Excluding the impact of FX translation, GCB revenues increased 3%, driven by an increase in North America GCB, partially offset by a decrease in international GCB revenues. North America GCB revenues increased 7% to $5.2 billion, with higher revenues in each of Citi-branded cards, Citi retail services and retail banking. Citi-branded cards revenues of $2.2 billion increased 15% versus the prior-year period, reflecting the addition of the Costco portfolio as well as modest revenue growth in the remainder of the portfolio driven by higher volumes. Citi retail services revenues of $1.6 billion increased 1% versus the prior-year period, as higher average loan growth in the portfolio was largely offset by the impact of previously disclosed renewals and extension of several partnerships as well as the absence of revenues from portfolio exits. Retail banking revenues increased 2% from the prior-year period to $1.4 billion, on higher average loans and checking deposits.
North America GCB average deposits of $184 billion grew 1% year-over-year and average retail banking loans of $55 billion grew 9%. Average Citi retail services loans of $44 billion increased 1% versus the prior-year period while retail services purchase sales of $20 billion declined 1% versus the prior-year period. Average Citi-branded card loans of $79 billion increased 24%, while Citi-branded card purchase sales of $73 billion increased 57% versus the prior-year period, each including the impact of the Costco portfolio acquisition. For additional information on the results of operations of North America GCB for the third quarter of 2016, including the impact of the Costco acquisition to North America GCB’s loans and purchase sales, see “Global Consumer BankingNorth America GCB” below.
International GCB revenues (consisting of Latin America GCB and Asia GCB (which includes GCB activities in certain EMEA countries)) decreased 7% versus the prior-year period to $3.0 billion driven by a decline in Latin America GCB (19%) partially offset by an increase in Asia GCB (4%). Excluding the impact of FX translation, international GCB revenues decreased 2% versus the prior-year period. Latin America GCB revenues decreased 7% versus the prior-year period, reflecting the absence of a previously disclosed $160 million gain (excluding the impact of FX translation, $180 million as reported) related to the sale of Citi’s merchant acquiring business in Mexico in the third quarter of 2015.


5



Excluding this gain, revenues would have increased 5% in Latin America GCB, driven by growth in retail banking loans and deposits, partially offset by a decline in cards revenues driven by the continued impact of higher payment rates.
Asia GCB revenues increased 3% versus the prior-year period, driven by growth in wealth management and cards revenues, partially offset by product repositioning away from lower-return mortgage loans in the retail lending portfolio. For additional information on the results of operations of Latin America GCB and Asia GCB for the third quarter of 2016, including the impact of FX translation, see “Global Consumer Banking” below. Excluding the impact of FX translation, international GCB average deposits of $119 billion increased 7%, average retail loans of $87 billion decreased 2%, investment sales of $14 billion increased 2%, average card loans of $23 billion increased 2% and card purchase sales of $23 billion increased 2%.
ICG revenues were $8.6 billion in the third quarter of 2016, unchanged from the prior-year period as a 6% increase in Markets and securities services was offset by a 6% decrease in Banking revenues (including the impact of a $218 million mark-to-market loss on hedges related to accrual loans within corporate lending, compared to a gain of $352 million in the prior year period). Excluding CVA/DVA in the third quarter of 2015 and the impact of mark-to-market gains/(losses) on loan hedges, ICG revenues increased 9% driven by an 11% increase in Markets and securities services revenues and a 7% increase in Banking revenues.
Banking revenues of $4.3 billion (excluding CVA/DVA in the third quarter of 2015 and the impact of mark-to-market gains/(losses) on loan hedges) increased 7% compared to the prior-year period, primarily driven by growth in treasury and trade solutions and debt underwriting revenues within investment banking. Investment banking revenues of $1.1 billion increased 15% versus the prior-year period. Advisory revenues were largely unchanged at $239 million. Equity underwriting revenues decreased 16% to $146 million, reflecting a decline in wallet share resulting from continued share fragmentation. Debt underwriting revenues increased 32% to $701 million, largely reflecting strong industry-wide underwriting activity.
Private bank revenues increased 5% (4% excluding CVA/DVA in the third quarter of 2015) to $746 million from the prior-year period, primarily driven by loan growth, improved spreads and higher managed investment revenues. Corporate lending revenues decreased 70% to $232 million. Excluding the impact of mark-to-market gains/(losses) on loan hedges, corporate lending revenues increased 4% versus the prior-year period, mostly reflecting higher average loans. Treasury and trade solutions revenues of $2.0 billion increased 5% from the prior-year period. Excluding the impact of FX translation, treasury and trade solutions revenues increased 8% reflecting continued growth in transaction volumes.
Markets and securities services revenues of $4.5 billion (excluding CVA/DVA in the third quarter of 2015) increased 11% from the prior-year period. Fixed income markets
 
revenues of $3.5 billion increased 26% (35% excluding CVA/DVA in the third quarter of 2015) from the prior-year period, driven by improvement in both rates and currencies and spread products. Equity markets revenues of $663 million decreased 37% (34% excluding CVA/DVA in the third quarter of 2015) versus the prior-year period. The third quarter of 2015 included a previously disclosed positive valuation adjustment of approximately $140 million related to certain financing transactions. Excluding this adjustment, equity markets revenues decreased 23% driven by lower market activity as well as the comparison to strong performance in Asia in the prior-year period. Securities services revenues of $536 million increased 4% versus the prior-year period. Excluding the impact of FX translation, securities services revenues increased 6% as increased client activity, higher deposit volumes and improved spreads more than offset the absence of revenues from divested businesses. For additional information on the results of operations of ICG for the third quarter of 2016, see “Institutional Clients Group” below.
Corporate/Other revenues were $28 million, down 87% from the prior-year period, mainly reflecting the absence of the equity contribution related to Citi’s stake in China Guangfa Bank, which was divested in the third quarter of 2016. For additional information on the results of operations of Corporate/Other for the third quarter of 2016, see “Corporate/Other” below.
Citicorp end-of-period loans increased 6% to $599 billion from the prior-year period, driven by a 7% increase in consumer loans and a 5% increase in corporate loans. Excluding the impact of FX translation, Citicorp loans grew 7%, with 7% growth in consumer loans and 6% growth in corporate loans.

Citi Holdings
Citi Holdings’ net income was $74 million in the third quarter of 2016, compared to a net loss of $1 million in the prior-year period. CVA/DVA was negative $25 million (negative $16 million after-tax) in the third quarter of 2015. Excluding the impact of CVA/DVA in the prior-year period, Citi Holdings’ net income was $74 million, compared to $15 million in the prior-year period, primarily reflecting lower expenses and lower credit costs, partially offset by lower revenues.
Citi Holdings’ revenues were $877 million, down 48% from the prior-year period. Excluding CVA/DVA in the third quarter of 2015, Citi Holdings’ revenues decreased 49% from the prior-year period, mainly reflecting continued reductions in Citi Holdings assets. For additional information on the results of operations of Citi Holdings for the third quarter of 2016, see “Citi Holdings” below.
At the end of the current quarter, Citi Holdings’ assets were $61 billion, 48% below the prior-year period. Citi Holdings’ risk-weighted assets were $114 billion as of September 30, 2016, a decrease of 30% from the prior-year period, and represented 9% of Citi’s risk-weighted assets under Basel III (based on the Advanced Approaches for determining risk-weighted assets).



6



RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—PAGE 1
Citigroup Inc. and Consolidated Subsidiaries
 
Third Quarter
 
Nine Months
 
In millions of dollars, except per-share amounts and ratios
2016
2015
% Change
2016
2015
% Change
Net interest revenue
$
11,479

$
11,773

(2
)%
$
33,942

$
35,167

(3
)%
Non-interest revenue
6,281

6,919

(9
)
18,921

22,731

(17
)
Revenues, net of interest expense
$
17,760

$
18,692

(5
)%
$
52,863

$
57,898

(9
)%
Operating expenses
10,404

10,669

(2
)
31,296

32,481

(4
)
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
1,736

1,836

(5
)
5,190

5,399

(4
)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
$
5,620

$
6,187

(9
)%
$
16,377

$
20,018

(18
)%
Income taxes
1,733

1,881

(8
)
4,935

6,037

(18
)
Income from continuing operations
$
3,887

$
4,306

(10
)%
$
11,442

$
13,981

(18
)%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
  net of taxes(1)
(30
)
(10
)
NM

(55
)
(9
)
NM

Net income before attribution of noncontrolling
  interests
$
3,857

$
4,296

(10
)%
$
11,387

$
13,972

(19
)%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
17

5

NM

48

65

(26
)
Citigroup’s net income
$
3,840

$
4,291

(11
)%
$
11,339

$
13,907

(18
)%
Less:
 
 


 
 
 
Preferred dividends—Basic
$
225

$
174

29
 %
$
757

$
504

50
 %
Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to employee restricted and deferred shares that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends, applicable to basic EPS
53

56

(5
)
145

182

(20
)
Income allocated to unrestricted common shareholders
  for basic and diluted EPS
$
3,562

$
4,061

(12
)%
$
10,437

$
13,221

(21
)%
Earnings per share
 
 


 
 

 
Basic
 
 


 
 

 
Income from continuing operations
$
1.25

$
1.36

(8
)
$
3.60

$
4.39

(18
)
Net income
1.24

1.36

(9
)
3.58

4.38

(18
)
Diluted
 
 


 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
$
1.25

$
1.36

(8
)%
$
3.60

$
4.38

(18
)%
Net income
1.24

1.35

(8
)
3.58

4.38

(18
)
Dividends declared per common share
0.16

0.05

NM

0.26

0.11

NM


Statement continues on the next page, including notes to the table.

7



SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—PAGE 2
 
Citigroup Inc. and Consolidated Subsidiaries
 
Third Quarter
 
Nine Months
 
In millions of dollars, except per-share amounts, ratios and
  direct staff
2016
2015
% Change
2016
2015
% Change
At September 30:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
$
1,818,117

$
1,808,356

1
 %
 
 
 
Total deposits
940,252

904,243

4

 
 
 
Long-term debt
209,051

213,533

(2
)
 
 
 
Citigroup common stockholders’ equity
212,322

205,630

3

 
 
 
Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity
231,575

220,848

5

 
 
 
Direct staff (in thousands)
220

239

(8
)
 
 
 
Performance metrics
 
 


 
 
 
Return on average assets
0.83
%
0.94
%


0.84
%
1.01
%
 
Return on average common stockholders’ equity(2)
6.8

8.0



6.7

8.8

 
Return on average total stockholders’ equity(2)
6.6

7.7



6.6

8.6

 
Efficiency ratio (Total operating expenses/Total revenues)
59

57



59

56

 
Basel III ratios—full implementation
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital(3)
12.63
%
11.67
%
 
 
 
 
Tier 1 Capital(3)
14.23

12.91

 
 
 
 
Total Capital(3)
16.34

14.60

 
 
 
 
Supplementary Leverage ratio(4)
7.40

6.85

 
 
 
 
Citigroup common stockholders’ equity to assets
11.68
%
11.37
%
 


 
 
Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity to assets
12.74

12.21

 


 
 
Dividend payout ratio(5)
12.9

3.7

 
7.3
%
2.5
%
 
Book value per common share
$
74.51

$
69.03

8
 %


 
 
Tangible book value (TBV) per share(6)
$
64.71

$
60.07

8
 %
 
 
 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
2.61x

2.92x

 
2.60x

3.04x

 
(1)
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on Citi’s discontinued operations.
(2)
The return on average common stockholders’ equity is calculated using net income less preferred stock dividends divided by average common stockholders’ equity. The return on average total Citigroup stockholders’ equity is calculated using net income divided by average Citigroup stockholders’ equity.
(3)
Citi’s regulatory capital ratios reflect full implementation of the U.S. Basel III rules. Risk-weighted assets are based on the Basel III Advanced Approaches for determining total risk-weighted assets.
(4)
Citi’s Supplementary Leverage ratio reflects full implementation of the U.S. Basel III rules.
(5)
Dividends declared per common share as a percentage of net income per diluted share.
(6)
For information on TBV, see “Capital Resources—Tangible Common Equity, Tangible Book Value Per Share and Book Value Per Share” below.




8



SEGMENT AND BUSINESS—INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES
CITIGROUP INCOME
 
Third Quarter
 
Nine Months
 
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
% Change
2016
2015
% Change
Income (loss) from continuing operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
CITICORP
 
 
 
 
 
 
Global Consumer Banking
 
 
 
 
 
 
North America
$
811

$
1,080

(25
)%
$
2,513

$
3,318

(24
)%
Latin America
167

306

(45
)
507

716

(29
)
Asia(1)
310

305

2

822

980

(16
)
Total
$
1,288

$
1,691

(24
)%
$
3,842

$
5,014

(23
)%
Institutional Clients Group


 




 


North America
$
1,119

$
991

13
 %
$
2,762

$
3,097

(11
)%
EMEA
680

499

36

1,799

2,129

(16
)
Latin America
396

389

2

1,129

1,194

(5
)
Asia
577

554

4

1,756

1,847

(5
)
Total
$
2,772

$
2,433

14
 %
$
7,446

$
8,267

(10
)%
Corporate/Other
(247
)
183

NM

(365
)
395

NM

Total Citicorp
$
3,813

$
4,307

(11
)%
$
10,923

$
13,676

(20
)%
Citi Holdings
$
74

$
(1
)
NM

$
519

$
305

70
 %
Income from continuing operations
$
3,887

$
4,306

(10
)%
$
11,442

$
13,981

(18
)%
Discontinued operations
$
(30
)
$
(10
)
NM

$
(55
)
$
(9
)
NM

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
17

5

NM

48

65

(26
)%
Citigroup’s net income
$
3,840

$
4,291

(11
)%
$
11,339

$
13,907

(18
)%

(1)
Asia GCB includes the results of operations of GCB activities in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.
NM Not meaningful

9



CITIGROUP REVENUES
 
Third Quarter
 
Nine Months
 
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
% Change
2016
2015
% Change
CITICORP
 
 
 
 
 
 
Global Consumer Banking
 
 
 
 
 
 
North America
$
5,212

$
4,893

7
 %
$
14,842

$
14,848

 %
Latin America
1,257

1,545

(19
)
3,746

4,409

(15
)
Asia(1)
1,758

1,696

4

5,142

5,363

(4
)
Total
$
8,227

$
8,134

1
 %
$
23,730

$
24,620

(4
)%
Institutional Clients Group


 


 
 


North America
$
3,276

$
3,440

(5
)%
$
9,800

$
10,354

(5
)%
EMEA
2,554

2,393

7

7,376

7,858

(6
)
Latin America
1,009

1,049

(4
)
3,017

3,067

(2
)
Asia
1,789

1,777

1

5,317

5,403

(2
)
Total
$
8,628

$
8,659

 %
$
25,510

$
26,682

(4
)%
Corporate/Other
28

218

(87
)
428

801

(47
)
Total Citicorp
$
16,883

$
17,011

(1
)%
$
49,668

$
52,103

(5
)%
Citi Holdings
$
877

$
1,681

(48
)%
$
3,195

$
5,795

(45
)%
Total Citigroup Net Revenues
$
17,760

$
18,692

(5
)%
$
52,863

$
57,898

(9
)%
(1)
Asia GCB includes the results of operations of GCB activities in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.




10



SEGMENT BALANCE SHEET(1) 
In millions of dollars
Global
Consumer
Banking
Institutional
Clients
Group
Corporate/Other
and
consolidating
eliminations(2)
Subtotal
Citicorp
Citi
Holdings
Citigroup
Parent
company-
issued
long-term
debt and
stockholders’
equity(3)
Total
Citigroup
consolidated
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and deposits with banks
$
10,063

$
69,676

$
75,301

$
155,040

$
950

$

$
155,990

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
282

235,138


235,420

625


236,045

Trading account assets
6,466

253,487

329

260,282

3,070


263,352

Investments
9,444

114,457

225,947

349,848

5,092


354,940

Loans, net of unearned income and
 
 
 
 
 
 

allowance for loan losses
281,789

306,872


588,661

37,335


625,996

Other assets
42,267

86,073

41,867

170,207

11,587


181,794

Liquidity assets(4)
61,200

236,419

(300,234
)
(2,615
)
2,615



Total assets
$
411,511

$
1,302,122

$
43,210

$
1,756,843

$
61,274

$

$
1,818,117

Liabilities and equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total deposits
$
306,541

$
617,209

$
10,566

$
934,316

$
5,936

$

$
940,252

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
3,481

149,627


153,108

16


153,124

Trading account liabilities
11

130,891

354

131,256

393


131,649

Short-term borrowings
45

19,434

10,047

29,526

1


29,527

Long-term debt(3)
1,296

33,980

20,602

55,878

4,131

149,042

209,051

Other liabilities
19,234

82,910

14,951

117,095

4,729


121,824

Net inter-segment funding (lending)(3)
80,903

268,071

(14,425
)
334,549

46,068

(380,617
)

Total liabilities
$
411,511

$
1,302,122

$
42,095

$
1,755,728

$
61,274

$
(231,575
)
$
1,585,427

Total equity(5)


1,115

1,115


231,575

232,690

Total liabilities and equity
$
411,511

$
1,302,122

$
43,210

$
1,756,843

$
61,274

$

$
1,818,117


(1)
The supplemental information presented in the table above reflects Citigroup’s consolidated GAAP balance sheet by reporting segment as of September 30, 2016. The respective segment information depicts the assets and liabilities managed by each segment as of such date.
(2)
Consolidating eliminations for total Citigroup and Citigroup parent company assets and liabilities are recorded within the Corporate/Other segment.
(3)
The total stockholders’ equity and the majority of long-term debt of Citigroup reside in the Citigroup parent company Consolidated Balance Sheet. Citigroup allocates stockholders’ equity and long-term debt to its businesses through inter-segment allocations as shown above.
(4)
Represents the attribution of Citigroup’s liquidity assets (primarily consisting of cash and available-for-sale securities) to the various businesses based on Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) assumptions.
(5)
Citicorp equity represents noncontrolling interests.



11



CITICORP
Citicorp is Citigroup’s global bank for consumers and businesses and represents Citi’s core franchises. Citicorp is focused on providing best-in-class products and services to customers and leveraging Citigroup’s unparalleled global network, including many of the world’s emerging economies. Citicorp is physically present in 97 countries and jurisdictions, many for over 100 years, and offers services in over 160 countries and jurisdictions. Citi believes this global network provides a strong foundation for servicing the broad financial services needs of its large multinational clients and for meeting the needs of retail, private banking, commercial, public sector and institutional clients around the world.
Citicorp consists of the following operating businesses: Global Consumer Banking (which consists of consumer banking businesses in North America, Latin America (consisting of Citi’s consumer banking businesses in Mexico) and Asia) and Institutional Clients Group (which includes Banking and Markets and securities services). Citicorp also includes Corporate/Other. At September 30, 2016, Citicorp had approximately $1.8 trillion of assets and $934 billion of deposits, representing approximately 97% of Citi’s total assets and 99% of Citi’s total deposits.

 
Third Quarter
 
Nine Months
 
In millions of dollars except as otherwise noted
2016
2015
% Change
2016
2015
% Change
Net interest revenue
$
10,997

$
10,622

4
 %
$
32,314

$
31,557

2
 %
Non-interest revenue
5,886

6,389

(8
)
17,354

20,546

(16
)
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
16,883

$
17,011

(1
)%
$
49,668

$
52,103

(5
)%
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims


 


 
 


Net credit losses
$
1,396

$
1,391

 %
$
4,491

$
4,465

1
 %
Credit reserve build (release)
343

90

NM

534

(160
)
NM

Provision for loan losses
$
1,739

$
1,481

17
 %
$
5,025

$
4,305

17
 %
Provision for benefits and claims
25

28

(11
)
73

77

(5
)
Provision for unfunded lending commitments
(45
)
84

NM

3

2

50

Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$
1,719

$
1,593

8
 %
$
5,101

$
4,384

16
 %
Total operating expenses
$
9,578

$
9,295

3
 %
$
28,784

$
28,360

1
 %
Income from continuing operations before taxes
$
5,586

$
6,123

(9
)%
$
15,783

$
19,359

(18
)%
Income taxes
1,773

1,816

(2
)
4,860

5,683

(14
)
Income from continuing operations
$
3,813

$
4,307

(11
)%
$
10,923

$
13,676

(20
)%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes
(30
)
(10
)
NM

(55
)
(9
)
NM

Noncontrolling interests
17

5

NM

42

64

(34
)
Net income
$
3,766

$
4,292

(12
)%
$
10,826

$
13,603

(20
)%
Balance sheet data (in billions of dollars)


 


 
 


Total end-of-period (EOP) assets
$
1,757

$
1,691

4
 %
 




Average assets
$
1,766

$
1,698

4

$
1,734

$
1,710

1

Return on average assets
0.85
%
1.00
%


0.83
%
1.06
%


Efficiency ratio
57
%
55
%


58
%
54
%


Total EOP loans
$
599

$
563

6

 




Total EOP deposits
$
934

$
894

5

 
 


NM Not meaningful

12



GLOBAL CONSUMER BANKING
Global Consumer Banking (GCB) provides traditional banking services to retail customers through retail banking, including commercial banking, and Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services (for additional information on these businesses, see “Citigroup Segments” above). GCB is focused on its priority markets in the U.S., Mexico and Asia with 2,679 branches in 19 countries as of September 30, 2016. At September 30, 2016, GCB had approximately $412 billion of assets and $307 billion of deposits.
GCB’s overall strategy is to leverage Citi’s global footprint and seek to be the preeminent bank for the emerging affluent and affluent consumers in large urban centers. In credit cards and in certain retail markets, Citi serves customers in a somewhat broader set of segments and geographies.

 
Third Quarter
 
Nine Months
 
In millions of dollars except as otherwise noted
2016
2015
% Change
2016
2015
% Change
Net interest revenue
$
6,770

$
6,519

4
 %
$
19,540

$
19,437

1
 %
Non-interest revenue
1,457

1,615

(10
)
4,190

5,183

(19
)
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
8,227

$
8,134

1
 %
$
23,730

$
24,620

(4
)%
Total operating expenses
$
4,440

$
4,231

5
 %
$
13,152

$
12,874

2
 %
Net credit losses
$
1,351

$
1,354

 %
$
4,094

$
4,347

(6
)%
Credit reserve build (release)
436

(103
)
NM

545

(349
)
NM

Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments
(3
)
1

NM

7

(3
)
NM

Provision for benefits and claims
25

28

(11
)
73

77

(5
)
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$
1,809

$
1,280

41
 %
$
4,719

$
4,072

16
 %
Income from continuing operations before taxes
$
1,978

$
2,623

(25
)%
$
5,859

$
7,674

(24
)%
Income taxes
690

932

(26
)
2,017

2,660

(24
)
Income from continuing operations
$
1,288

$
1,691

(24
)%
$
3,842

$
5,014

(23
)%
Noncontrolling interests
3

8

(63
)
6

9

(33
)
Net income
$
1,285

$
1,683

(24
)%
$
3,836

$
5,005

(23
)%
Balance Sheet data (in billions of dollars)


 


 
 


Average assets
$
410

$
375

9
 %
$
392

$
379

3
 %
Return on average assets
1.25
%
1.78
%


1.31
%
1.77
%


Efficiency ratio
54
%
52
%


55
%
52
%


Total EOP assets
$
412

$
377

9

 
 


Average deposits
$
303

$
295

3

$
299

$
297

1

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans
1.87
%
1.99
%


1.97
%
2.14
%


Revenue by business


 


 
 


Retail banking
$
3,361

$
3,514

(4
)%
$
9,849

$
10,585

(7
)%
Cards(1)
4,866

4,620

5

13,881

14,035

(1
)
Total
$
8,227

$
8,134

1
 %
$
23,730

$
24,620

(4
)%
Income from continuing operations by business


 


 
 


Retail banking
$
478

$
574

(17
)%
$
1,284

$
1,702

(25
)%
Cards(1)
810

1,117

(27
)
2,558

3,312

(23
)
Total
$
1,288

$
1,691

(24
)%
$
3,842

$
5,014

(23
)%
Table continues on next page.


13



Foreign currency (FX) translation impact
 
 


 
 
 
Total revenue—as reported
$
8,227

$
8,134

1
 %
$
23,730

$
24,620

(4
)%
Impact of FX translation(2)

(174
)



(769
)


Total revenues—ex-FX(3)
$
8,227

$
7,960

3
 %
$
23,730

$
23,851

(1
)%
Total operating expenses—as reported
$
4,440

$
4,231

5
 %
$
13,152

$
12,874

2
 %
Impact of FX translation(2)

(70
)



(356
)


Total operating expenses—ex-FX(3)
$
4,440

$
4,161

7
 %
$
13,152

$
12,518

5
 %
Total provisions for LLR & PBC—as reported
$
1,809

$
1,280

41
 %
$
4,719

$
4,072

16
 %
Impact of FX translation(2)

(41
)



(159
)


Total provisions for LLR & PBC—ex-FX(3)
$
1,809

$
1,239

46
 %
$
4,719

$
3,913

21
 %
Net income—as reported
$
1,285

$
1,683

(24
)%
$
3,836

$
5,005

(23
)%
Impact of FX translation(2)

(49
)



(182
)


Net income—ex-FX(3)
$
1,285

$
1,634

(21
)%
$
3,836

$
4,823

(20
)%
(1)
Includes both Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services.
(2)
Reflects the impact of FX translation into U.S. dollars at the third quarter of 2016 average exchange rates for all periods presented.
(3)
Presentation of this metric excluding FX translation is a non-GAAP financial measure.
NM Not meaningful


14



NORTH AMERICA GCB
North America GCB provides traditional retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services card products to retail customers and small to mid-size businesses, as applicable, in the U.S. North America GCB’s U.S. cards product portfolio includes its proprietary portfolio (including the Citi Double Cash, Thank You and Value cards) and co-branded cards (including, among others, American Airlines, Costco and Hilton Worldwide) within Citi-branded cards as well as its co-brand and private label relationships within Citi retail services.
As of September 30, 2016, North America GCB’s 727 retail bank branches are concentrated in the six key metropolitan areas of New York, Chicago, Miami, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and San Francisco. Also as of September 30, 2016, North America GCB had approximately 10.6 million retail banking customer accounts, $54.8 billion of retail banking loans and $185.6 billion of deposits. In addition, North America GCB had approximately 120.8 million Citi-branded and Citi retail services credit card accounts with $125.2 billion in outstanding card loan balances.

 
Third Quarter
% Change
Nine Months
% Change
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted
2016
2015
2016
2015
Net interest revenue
$
4,748

$
4,455

7
 %
$
13,567

$
13,103

4
 %
Non-interest revenue
464

438

6

1,275

1,745

(27
)
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
5,212

$
4,893

7
 %
$
14,842

$
14,848

 %
Total operating expenses
$
2,600

$
2,319

12
 %
$
7,538

$
6,976

8
 %
Net credit losses
$
929

$
878

6
 %
$
2,814

$
2,837

(1
)%
Credit reserve build (release)
408

(61
)
NM

537

(268
)
NM

Provision for unfunded lending commitments


NM

8

1

NM

Provisions for benefits and claims
7

11

(36
)
24

30

(20
)
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$
1,344

$
828

62
 %
$
3,383

$
2,600

30
 %
Income from continuing operations before taxes
$
1,268

$
1,746

(27
)%
$
3,921

$
5,272

(26
)%
Income taxes
457

666

(31
)
1,408

1,954

(28
)
Income from continuing operations
$
811

$
1,080

(25
)%
$
2,513

$
3,318

(24
)%
Noncontrolling interests

1

(100
)
(1
)
2

NM

Net income
$
811

$
1,079

(25
)%
$
2,514

$
3,316

(24
)%
Balance Sheet data (in billions of dollars)


 


 
 



Average assets
$
239

$
209

14
 %
$
223

$
208

7
 %
Return on average assets
1.35
%
2.05
%


1.51
%
2.13
%


Efficiency ratio
50
%
47
%


51
%
47
%


Average deposits
$
183.9

$
181.4

1

$
182.2

$
180.6

1

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans
2.08
%
2.21
%


2.24
%
2.43
%


Revenue by business


 


 
 



Retail banking
$
1,374

$
1,347

2
 %
$
4,011

$
4,140

(3
)%
Citi-branded cards
2,213

1,930

15

6,000

5,872

2

Citi retail services
1,625

1,616

1

4,831

4,836


Total
$
5,212

$
4,893

7
 %
$
14,842

$
14,848

 %
Income from continuing operations by business


 


 
 



Retail banking
$
196

$
161

22
 %
$
472

$
578

(18
)%
Citi-branded cards
336

522

(36
)
1,036

1,560

(34
)
Citi retail services
279

397

(30
)
1,005

1,180

(15
)
Total
$
811

$
1,080

(25
)%
$
2,513

$
3,318

(24
)%


NM Not meaningful


15



3Q16 vs. 3Q15
Net income decreased by 25% due to significantly higher cost of credit and higher expenses, partially offset by higher revenues.
Revenues increased 7%, reflecting higher revenues in each of retail banking, Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services.
Retail banking revenues increased 2%. The increase was primarily driven by continued volume growth in consumer and commercial banking, including growth in average loans (9%) and average checking deposits (10%), as well as an increase in mortgage gain on sale revenues due to higher margins, although North America GCB expects a seasonal decline in mortgage activity during the fourth quarter of 2016. The increase in revenues was partially offset by lower spreads and lower mortgage servicing revenues.
Cards revenues increased 8%. In Citi-branded cards, revenues increased 15%, primarily reflecting the first full quarter of revenues from the acquisition of the Costco portfolio (completed June 17, 2016). Excluding Costco, revenues increased modestly (1%) as the impact of investment-related acquisition costs abated and a portion of new loan balances matured to full rate. Average loans grew 24% (3% excluding Costco) and purchase sales grew 57% (7% excluding Costco).
Citi retail services revenues increased 1% as higher average loan growth was largely offset by the impact of the previously disclosed renewal and extension of several partnerships within the portfolio as well as the absence of revenues associated with two portfolios sold in the first quarter of 2016. Average loans increased 1%, while purchase sales decreased 1%.
Expenses increased 12%, primarily due to the Costco portfolio acquisition, volume growth and continued marketing investments, partially offset by ongoing efficiency savings. North America GCB expects to continue to incur elevated expenses in the fourth quarter of 2016 reflecting seasonally higher marketing expenses as well as ongoing investment spending, including within retail banking as the business invests in its digital and mobile banking capabilities, among other initiatives.
Provisions increased 62%, driven by a net loan loss reserve build ($408 million), compared to a loan loss reserve release in the prior-year period ($61 million), and higher net credit losses (6%).
The net loan loss reserve build mostly reflected a reserve build in the cards portfolios and was driven, largely in equal amounts, by the impact of the acquisition of the Costco portfolio, volume growth and seasoning of the portfolios, as well as the estimated impact of newly proposed regulatory guidelines on third party debt collections. This build was partially offset by a release related to the commercial banking portfolio (for information on Citi’s energy and energy-related exposures within commercial banking within North America GCB, see “Credit Risk—Commercial Credit” below).
The increase in net credit losses was primarily driven by an increase in Citi retail services of 6% to $427 million, primarily due to portfolio growth and seasoning. In retail banking, net credit losses grew 59% to $54 million, primarily
 
due to an increase related to the commercial portfolio which was fully offset by the reserve release described above. In Citi-branded cards, net credit losses increased 1% to $448 million, despite a 24% increase in average loans, as the Costco portfolio did not incur losses in the third quarter of 2016. North America GCB expects net credit losses in both cards portfolios to increase in the near term due to portfolio growth and seasoning, the normalization of losses in the Costco portfolio and the newly proposed regulatory guidelines described above.

2016 YTD vs. 2015 YTD
Year-to-date, North America GCB has experienced similar trends to those described above. Net income decreased 24% due to higher expenses and a net loan loss reserve build, while revenues were largely unchanged.
Revenues were unchanged, reflecting lower revenues in retail banking, offset by higher revenues in Citi-branded cards. Retail banking revenues decreased 3%. Excluding the previously disclosed $110 million gain on sale of branches in Texas in the first quarter of 2015, revenues were largely unchanged as volume growth in consumer and commercial banking was offset by lower mortgage gain on sale revenues due to lower mortgage originations. Cards revenues increased 1%. In Citi-branded cards, revenues increased 2%, driven by the acquisition of the Costco portfolio, partially offset by higher acquisition and rewards costs related to the investment spending. Citi retail services revenues were largely unchanged, primarily due to portfolio growth and gains on sales of two cards portfolios in the first quarter of 2016, offset by the impact of the partnership renewals and extensions.
Expenses increased 8%, primarily due to the continued investment spending as well as higher repositioning charges, volume-related expenses and regulatory and compliance costs, partially offset by ongoing cost reduction initiatives, including as a result of the retail business’ branch rationalization strategy.
Provisions increased 30%, largely due to a net loan loss reserve build ($537 million), compared to a net loan loss reserve release in the prior-year period ($268 million), partially offset by modestly lower net credit losses (1%). The net loan loss reserve build was driven by the impact of the Costco portfolio, volume growth and the estimated impact of the newly proposed regulatory guidelines described above, partially offset by a release related to energy and energy-related exposures in the commercial banking portfolio within retail banking. The decline in net credit losses was driven by a 5% decrease in Citi-branded cards, mostly offset by increases in retail banking (13%) and Citi retail services (2%).






16



LATIN AMERICA GCB
Latin America GCB provides traditional retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded card products to retail customers and small to mid-size businesses in Mexico through Citibanamex (previously known as Banco Nacional de Mexico, or Banamex), Mexico’s second-largest bank.
At September 30, 2016, Latin America GCB had 1,494 retail branches in Mexico, with approximately 28.8 million retail banking customer accounts, $19.0 billion in retail banking loans and $27.4 billion in deposits. In addition, the business had approximately 5.8 million Citi-branded card accounts with $4.9 billion in outstanding loan balances.

 
Third Quarter
% Change
Nine Months
% Change
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted
2016
2015
2016
2015
Net interest revenue
$
886

$
959

(8
)%
$
2,620

$
2,940

(11
)%
Non-interest revenue
371

586

(37
)
1,126

1,469

(23
)
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
1,257

$
1,545

(19
)%
$
3,746

$
4,409

(15
)%
Total operating expenses
$
713

$
795

(10
)%
$
2,159

$
2,438

(11
)%
Net credit losses
$
254

$
301

(16
)%
$
792

$
973

(19
)%
Credit reserve build (release)
32

19

68

47

30

57

Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments

1

(100
)
2

(2
)
NM

Provision for benefits and claims
18

17

6

49

47

4

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims (LLR & PBC)
$
304

$
338

(10
)%
$
890

$
1,048

(15
)%
Income from continuing operations before taxes
$
240

$
412

(42
)%
$
697

$
923

(24
)%
Income taxes
73

106

(31
)
190

207

(8
)
Income from continuing operations
$
167

$
306

(45
)%
$
507

$
716

(29
)%
Noncontrolling interests
2

1

100

4

3

33

Net income
$
165

$
305

(46
)%
$
503

$
713

(29
)%
Balance Sheet data (in billions of dollars)


 


 
 



Average assets
$
50

$
50

 %
$
50

$
54

(7
)%
Return on average assets
1.31
%
2.42
%


1.34
%
1.77
%


Efficiency ratio
57
%
51
%


58
%
55
%


Average deposits
$
27.2

$
27.1


$
27.5

$
28.4

(3
)
Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans
4.12
%
4.65
%


4.30
%
4.85
%


Revenue by business


 


 
 


Retail banking
$
893

$
1,100

(19
)%
$
2,626

$
3,047

(14
)%
Citi-branded cards
364

445

(18
)
1,120

1,362

(18
)
Total
$
1,257

$
1,545

(19
)%
$
3,746

$
4,409

(15
)%
Income from continuing operations by business


 


 
 



Retail banking
$
91

$
228

(60
)%
$
297

$
497

(40
)%
Citi-branded cards
76

78

(3
)
210

219

(4
)
Total
$
167

$
306

(45
)%
$
507

$
716

(29
)%
FX translation impact


 


 
 



Total revenues—as reported
$
1,257

$
1,545

(19
)%
$
3,746

$
4,409

(15
)%
Impact of FX translation(1)

(193
)



(646
)


Total revenues—ex-FX(2)
$
1,257

$
1,352

(7
)%
$
3,746

$
3,763

 %
Total operating expenses—as reported
$
713

$
795

(10
)%
$
2,159

$
2,438

(11
)%
Impact of FX translation(1)

(79
)



(260
)


Total operating expenses—ex-FX(2)
$
713

$
716

 %
$
2,159

$
2,178

(1
)%
Provisions for LLR & PBC—as reported
$
304

$
338

(10
)%
$
890

$
1,048

(15
)%
Impact of FX translation(1)

(43
)



(148
)


Provisions for LLR & PBC—ex-FX(2)
$
304

$
295

3
 %
$
890

$
900

(1
)%
Net income—as reported
$
165

$
305

(46
)%
$
503

$
713

(29
)%
Impact of FX translation(1)

(54
)



(182
)


Net income—ex-FX(2)
$
165

$
251

(34
)%
$
503

$
531

(5
)%
(1)
Reflects the impact of FX translation into U.S. dollars at the third quarter of 2016 average exchange rates for all periods presented.
(2)
Presentation of this metric excluding FX translation is a non-GAAP financial measure.

17



NM Not Meaningful


The discussion of the results of operations for Latin America GCB below excludes the impact of FX translation for all periods presented. Presentations of the results of operations, excluding the impact of FX translation, are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of certain of these metrics to the reported results, see the table above.

3Q16 vs. 3Q15
Net income decreased 34%, driven by lower revenues and higher cost of credit.
Revenues decreased 7%, driven by the absence of a previously disclosed $160 million gain on sale (excluding the impact of FX translation, $180 million as reported) related to the sale of the merchant acquiring business in Mexico in the prior-year period. Excluding this gain, revenues would have increased 5%, primarily due to higher revenues in retail banking, partially offset by lower revenues in cards.
Retail banking revenues decreased 8%. Excluding the gain on sale related to the merchant acquiring business, revenues would have increased 11%, driven by volume growth, including an increase in average loans (8%), driven by higher personal loans, and higher average deposits (12%), partially offset by a decline in loan spreads. Cards revenues decreased 6%, driven by the continued impact of higher payment rates and the absence of certain episodic fee revenues in the prior-year period, partially offset by higher volumes (average loans up 3%) and increased purchase sales (9%). Excluding the fee revenues in the prior-year period, cards revenues would have declined 3%, largely reflecting the continued impact of the higher payment rates resulting from the business’ focus on higher credit quality customers.
Expenses were unchanged as ongoing efficiency savings and lower marketing expenses were offset by technology investments. As previously announced, Citi intends to invest more than $1 billion in Citibanamex over the next several years, including initiatives within Latin America GCB to enhance the branch network, digital capabilities and service offerings.
Provisions increased 3%, driven by a higher net loan loss reserve build, partially offset by lower net credit losses. The net loan loss reserve build increased $14 million, primarily due to volume growth within the personal loan and commercial banking portfolios, partially offset by a release related to cards. Net credit losses decreased 3%, largely reflecting continued lower net credit losses in the cards portfolio due to a focus on higher credit quality customers. Despite this decrease, Latin America GCB expects net credit losses within its loan portfolios could increase in the near term consistent with continued portfolio growth and seasoning.


 

2016 YTD vs. 2015 YTD
Net income decreased 5%, driven by a higher tax rate due to the absence of certain tax benefits, partially offset by modestly lower expenses and cost of credit.
Revenues were largely unchanged. Excluding the gain on sale related to the merchant acquiring business, revenues would have increased 4%, primarily due to higher revenues in retail banking, partially offset by lower revenues in cards. Retail banking revenues increased 1%. Excluding the gain on sale related to the merchant acquiring business, revenues would have increased 8%, driven by the same factors described above as well as the impact of lower revenues due to business divestitures. Cards revenues decreased 4%, driven by the continued higher payment rates.
Expenses decreased 1%, primarily due to lower legal and related expenses, the impact of business divestitures and ongoing efficiency savings, partially offset by repositioning charges, higher marketing costs and ongoing investment spending.
Provisions decreased 1% as lower net credit losses were partially offset by a higher net loan loss reserve build. Net credit losses decreased 6%, largely reflecting lower net credit losses in the cards and personal loan portfolios due to the focus on higher credit quality customers. The net loan loss reserve build increased $24 million, primarily due to a net loan loss reserve build for the personal loan and the commercial banking portfolios, partially offset by a release related to cards portfolio.




18



ASIA GCB
Asia GCB provides traditional retail banking, including commercial banking, and its Citi-branded card products to retail customers and small to mid-size businesses, as applicable. As of September 30, 2016, Citi’s most significant revenues in the region were from Singapore, Hong Kong, Korea, India, Australia, Taiwan, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia and the Philippines. Included within Asia GCB, traditional retail banking and Citi-branded card products are also provided to retail customers in certain EMEA countries, primarily in Poland, Russia and the United Arab Emirates.
At September 30, 2016, on a combined basis, the businesses had 458 retail branches, approximately 16.9 million retail banking customer accounts, $68.1 billion in retail banking loans and $93.6 billion in deposits. In addition, the businesses had approximately 16.4 million Citi-branded card accounts with $17.7 billion in outstanding loan balances.

 
Third Quarter
% Change
Nine Months
% Change
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted (1)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Net interest revenue
$
1,136

$
1,105

3
 %
$
3,353

$
3,394

(1
)%
Non-interest revenue
622

591

5

1,789

1,969

(9
)
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
1,758

$
1,696

4
 %
$
5,142

$
5,363

(4
)%
Total operating expenses
$
1,127

$
1,117

1
 %
$
3,455

$
3,460

 %
Net credit losses
$
168

$
175

(4
)%
$
488

$
537

(9
)%
Credit reserve build (release)
(4
)
(61
)
93

(39
)
(111
)
65

Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments
(3
)

NM

(3
)
(2
)
(50
)
Provisions for credit losses
$
161

$
114

41
 %
$
446

$
424

5
 %
Income from continuing operations before taxes
$
470

$
465

1
 %
$
1,241

$
1,479

(16
)%
Income taxes
160

160


419

499

(16
)
Income from continuing operations
$
310

$
305

2
 %
$
822

$
980

(16
)%
Noncontrolling interests
1

6

(83
)
3

4

(25
)
Net income
$
309

$
299

3
 %
$
819

$
976

(16
)%
Balance Sheet data (in billions of dollars)






 
 



Average assets
$
121

$
116

4
 %
$
119

$
117

2
 %
Return on average assets
1.02
%
1.02
%


0.92
%
1.12
%


Efficiency ratio
64
%
66
%
 
67
%
65
%


Average deposits
$
91.6

$
86.4

6

$
89.4

$
88.0

2

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans
0.78
%
0.80
%


0.77
%
0.80
%


Revenue by business
 
 
 
 
 


Retail banking
$
1,094

$
1,067

3
 %
$
3,212

$
3,398

(5
)%
Citi-branded cards
664

629

6

1,930

1,965

(2
)
Total
$
1,758

$
1,696

4
 %
$
5,142

$
5,363

(4
)%
Income from continuing operations by business






 
 


Retail banking
$
191

$
185

3
 %
$
515

$
627

(18
)%
Citi-branded cards
119

120

(1
)
307

353

(13
)
Total
$
310

$
305

2
 %
$
822

$
980

(16
)%

19



FX translation impact



 
 


Total revenues—as reported
$
1,758

$
1,696

4
 %
$
5,142

$
5,363

(4
)%
Impact of FX translation(2)

19




(123
)


Total revenues—ex-FX(3)
$
1,758

$
1,715

3
 %
$
5,142

$
5,240

(2
)%
Total operating expenses—as reported
$
1,127

$
1,117

1
 %
$
3,455

$
3,460

 %
Impact of FX translation(2)

9




(96
)


Total operating expenses—ex-FX(3)
$
1,127

$
1,126

 %
$
3,455

$
3,364

3
 %
Provisions for loan losses—as reported
$
161

$
114

41
 %
$
446

$
424

5
 %
Impact of FX translation(2)

2




(11
)


Provisions for loan losses—ex-FX(3)
$
161

$
116

39
 %
$
446

$
413

8
 %
Net income—as reported
$
309

$
299

3
 %
$
819

$
976

(16
)%
Impact of FX translation(2)

5







Net income—ex-FX(3)
$
309

$
304

2
 %
$
819

$
976

(16
)%

(1)
Asia GCB includes the results of operations of GCB activities in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.
(2)
Reflects the impact of FX translation into U.S. dollars at the third quarter of 2016 average exchange rates for all periods presented.
(3)
Presentation of this metric excluding FX translation is a non-GAAP financial measure.
NM
Not meaningful

The discussion of the results of operations for Asia GCB below excludes the impact of FX translation for all periods presented. Presentations of the results of operations, excluding the impact of FX translation, are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of certain of these metrics to the reported results, see the table above.

3Q16 vs. 3Q15
Net income increased 2%, reflecting higher revenues, largely offset by higher cost of credit.
Revenues increased 3%, reflecting both higher retail banking and cards revenues. Retail banking revenues increased 2%, mainly due to an 11% increase in wealth management revenues due to improving investment sentiment, particularly in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Indonesia, as well as an increase in assets under management. Retail banking revenues excluding wealth management decreased 1%, primarily due to lower average loans (decrease of 4%), largely offset by growth in deposit volumes (5% increase in average deposits) and higher insurance revenues. The lower average loans was due to the product repositioning of the portfolio away from lower return mortgage loans as well as de-risking in the commercial portfolio.
Cards revenues increased 4%, driven by modest volume growth, continued improvement in yields and abating regulatory headwinds. The volume growth was driven by a 2% increase in average loans, stabilizing payment rates and a 1% increase in purchase sales.
Expenses were largely unchanged as investment spending and higher regulatory and compliance costs were offset by efficiency savings.
Provisions increased 39%, primarily due to higher net loan loss reserve releases in the prior-year period, partially offset by lower net credit losses.


 
2016 YTD vs. 2015 YTD
Net income decreased 16% due to lower revenues, higher expenses and higher cost of credit.
Revenues decreased 2%, primarily due to the slowdown in wealth management revenues in the first half of the year and lower retail lending revenues, partially offset by higher cards revenues. Retail banking revenues decreased 3%, driven by the lower wealth management revenues and lower average loans, partially offset by growth in deposit volumes and higher insurance revenues. Cards revenues increased 1%, primarily due to the same factors described above.
Expenses increased 3%, driven by higher repositioning costs and higher regulatory and compliance costs, partially offset by efficiency savings.
Provisions increased 8%, primarily due to a lower net loan loss reserve release, partially offset by lower net credit losses.















20


INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS GROUP

Institutional Clients Group (ICG) provides corporate, institutional, public sector and high-net-worth clients around the world with a full range of wholesale banking products and services, including fixed income and equity sales and trading, foreign exchange, prime brokerage, derivative services, equity and fixed income research, corporate lending, investment banking and advisory services, private banking, cash management, trade finance and securities services. ICG transacts with clients in both cash instruments and derivatives, including fixed income, foreign currency, equity and commodity products.
ICG revenue is generated primarily from fees and spreads associated with these activities. ICG earns fee income for assisting clients in clearing transactions, providing brokerage and investment banking services and other such activities. Revenue generated from these activities is recorded in Commissions and fees and Investment banking. In addition, as a market maker, ICG facilitates transactions, including holding product inventory to meet client demand, and earns the differential between the price at which it buys and sells the products. These price differentials and the unrealized gains and losses on the inventory are recorded in Principal transactions. Other primarily includes mark-to-market gains and losses on certain credit derivatives, gains and losses on available-for-sale (AFS) securities and other non-recurring gains and losses. Interest income earned on inventory and loans held less interest paid to customers on deposits and long-term and short-term debt is recorded as Net interest revenue. Revenue is also generated from transaction processing and assets under custody and administration.
ICG’s international presence is supported by trading floors in approximately 80 countries and a proprietary network in over 100 countries and jurisdictions. At September 30, 2016, ICG had approximately $1.3 trillion of assets and $617 billion of deposits, while two of its businesses, securities services and issuer services, managed approximately $15.4 trillion of assets under custody compared to $14.9 trillion at the end of the prior-year period.
 
Third Quarter
% Change
Nine Months
% Change
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted
2016
2015
2016
2015
Commissions and fees
$
928

$
958

(3
)%
$
2,886

$
2,945

(2
)%
Administration and other fiduciary fees
610

594

3

1,845

1,870

(1
)
Investment banking
917

828

11

2,686

3,082

(13
)
Principal transactions
2,063

1,209

71

5,548

5,199

7

Other(1)
(126
)
903

NM

(88
)
1,353

NM

Total non-interest revenue
$
4,392

$
4,492

(2
)%
$
12,877

$
14,449

(11
)%
Net interest revenue (including dividends)
4,236

4,167

2

12,633

12,233

3

Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
8,628

$
8,659

 %
$
25,510

$
26,682

(4
)%
Total operating expenses
$
4,680

$
4,715

(1
)%
$
14,309

$
14,209

1
 %
Net credit losses
$
45

$
37

22
 %
$
397

$
118

NM

Credit reserve build (release)
(93
)
193

NM

(11
)
189

NM

Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments
(42
)
83

NM

(4
)
5

NM

Provisions for credit losses
$
(90
)
$
313

NM

$
382

$
312

22
 %
Income from continuing operations before taxes
$
4,038

$
3,631

11
 %
$
10,819

$
12,161

(11
)%
Income taxes
1,266

1,198

6

3,373

3,894

(13
)
Income from continuing operations
$
2,772

$
2,433

14
 %
$
7,446

$
8,267

(10
)%
Noncontrolling interests
19

(6
)
NM

46

44

5

Net income
$
2,753

$
2,439

13
 %
$
7,400

$
8,223

(10
)%
Average assets (in billions of dollars)
$
1,309

$
1,264

4
 %
$
1,293

$
1,276

1
 %
Return on average assets
0.84
%
0.77
%


0.76
%
0.86
%


Efficiency ratio
54
%
54
%


56
%
53
%


CVA/DVA-after-tax
$

$
143

(100
)%
$

$
289

(100
)%
Net income ex-CVA/DVA (2)
$
2,753

$
2,296

20
 %
$
7,400

$
7,934

(7
)%
Revenues by region
 
 


 
 


North America
$
3,276

$
3,440

(5
)%
$
9,800

$
10,354

(5
)%
EMEA
2,554

2,393

7

7,376

7,858

(6
)
Latin America
1,009

1,049

(4
)
3,017

3,067

(2
)
Asia
1,789

1,777

1

5,317

5,403

(2
)
Total
$
8,628

$
8,659

 %
$
25,510

$
26,682

(4
)%

21


Income from continuing operations by region
 
 


 
 



North America
$
1,119

$
991

13
 %
$
2,762

$
3,097

(11
)%
EMEA
680

499

36

1,799

2,129

(16
)
Latin America
396

389

2

1,129

1,194

(5
)
Asia
577

554

4

1,756

1,847

(5
)
Total
$
2,772

$
2,433

14
 %
$
7,446

$
8,267

(10
)%
Average loans by region (in billions of dollars)
 
 


 
 



North America
$
135

$
126

7
 %
$
132

$
122

8
 %
EMEA
68

63

8

66

62

6

Latin America
43

40

8

43

40

8

Asia
60

62

(3
)
60

62

(3
)
Total
$
306

$
291

5
 %
$
301

$
286

5
 %
EOP deposits by business (in billions of dollars)
 
 
 
 
 


Treasury and trade solutions
$
415

$
399

4
 %
 
 


All other ICG businesses
202

196

3







Total
$
617

$
595

4
 %







(1)
First quarter of 2016 includes a previously disclosed charge of approximately $180 million primarily reflecting the write down of Citi’s net investment in Venezuela as a result of changes in the exchange rate during the quarter.
(2)
Excludes CVA/DVA in the third quarter and nine months of 2015, consistent with current period presentation. For additional information, see Notes 1 and 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
NM Not Meaningful
ICG Revenue Details—Excluding CVA/DVA and Gain/(Loss) on Loan Hedges(1) 
 
Third Quarter
% Change
Nine Months
% Change
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Investment banking revenue details
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advisory
$
239

$
239

 %
$
704

$
791

(11
)%
Equity underwriting
146

173

(16
)
438

700

(37
)
Debt underwriting
701

532

32

2,036

1,945

5

Total investment banking
$
1,086

$
944

15
 %
$
3,178

$
3,436

(8
)%
Treasury and trade solutions
2,039

1,933

5

6,038

5,778

4

Corporate lending—excluding gain (loss)
  on loan hedges(2)
450

433

4

1,294

1,385

(7
)
Private bank
746

715

4

2,230

2,171

3

Total banking revenues (ex-CVA/DVA and gain (loss)
  on loan hedges)(1)
$
4,321

$
4,025

7
 %
$
12,740

$
12,770

 %
Corporate lending—gain/(loss) on loan hedges(2)
$
(218
)
$
352

NM

$
(487
)
$
338

NM

Total banking revenues (ex-CVA/DVA and including
  gain (loss) on loan hedges)(1)
$
4,103

$
4,377

(6
)%
$
12,253

$
13,108

(7
)%
Fixed income markets
$
3,466

$
2,566

35
 %
$
10,019

$
9,097

10
 %
Equity markets
663

1,002

(34
)
2,157

2,518

(14
)
Securities services
536

513

4

1,629

1,626


Other(3)
(140
)
(20
)
NM

(548
)
(122
)
NM

Total Markets and securities services (ex-CVA/DVA)(1)
$
4,525

$
4,061

11
 %
$
13,257

$
13,119

1
 %
Total ICG (ex-CVA/DVA)
$
8,628

$
8,438

2
 %
$
25,510

$
26,227

(3
)%
CVA/DVA (excluded as applicable in lines above)

221

NM


455

NM

     Fixed income markets

180

NM


392

NM

     Equity markets

44

NM


63

NM

     Private bank

(3
)
NM



NM

Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
8,628

$
8,659

 %
$
25,510

$
26,682

(4
)%


22


(1)
Excludes CVA/DVA in the third quarter and nine months of 2015, consistent with current period presentation. For additional information, see Notes 1 and 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)
Hedges on accrual loans reflect the mark-to-market on credit derivatives used to economically hedge the corporate loan accrual portfolio. The fixed premium costs of these hedges are netted against the corporate lending revenues to reflect the cost of credit protection.
(3)
First quarter of 2016 includes the previously disclosed charge of approximately $180 million, primarily reflecting the write down of Citi’s net investment in Venezuela as a result of changes in the exchange rate during the quarter.
NM Not meaningful


The discussion of the results of operations for ICG below excludes the impact of CVA/DVA for the third quarter and year-to-date 2015. Presentations of the results of operations, excluding the impact of CVA/DVA and the impact of gains/(losses) on hedges on accrual loans, are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of these metrics to the reported results, see the table above.

3Q16 vs. 3Q15
Net income increased 20%, primarily driven by higher revenues, lower expenses and lower cost of credit.

Revenues increased 2%, reflecting higher revenues in Markets and securities services (increase of 11%), driven by fixed income markets, offset by lower revenues in Banking (decrease of 6% including the gains/(losses) on hedges on accrual loans). Excluding the impact of the gains/(losses) on loan hedges, Banking revenues increased 7%, driven by debt underwriting in investment banking and treasury and trade solutions. Citi expects revenues in ICG will likely continue to reflect the overall market environment during the remainder of 2016, including a normal seasonal decline in Markets and securities services revenues.

Within Banking:

Investment banking revenues increased 15%, largely reflecting increased industry-wide debt underwriting activity during the current quarter. Advisory revenues were largely unchanged, despite a lower overall M&A market. Equity underwriting revenues decreased 16%, driven by North America, primarily reflecting a decrease in wallet share resulting from continued share fragmentation. Debt underwriting revenues increased 32%, driven by North America and EMEA, primarily due to the higher market activity.
Treasury and trade solutions revenues increased 5%. Excluding the impact of FX translation, revenues increased 8% due to continued growth in transaction volumes with new and existing clients, continued growth in deposit balances, particularly in North America and EMEA, improved spreads, and overall growth in the trade business, driven by Latin America. End-of-period deposit balances increased 4%, while average trade loans decreased 1% (unchanged excluding the impact of FX translation).
Corporate lending revenues decreased 70%. Excluding the impact of gains/(losses) on hedges on accrual loans, revenues increased 4%, mostly reflecting higher average loans, partially offset by higher hedging costs.
Private bank revenues increased 4%, driven by North America, reflecting loan growth, improved banking spreads and higher managed investment revenues.


 

Within Markets and securities services:

Fixed income markets revenues increased 35%, with higher revenues in all regions. The increase in fixed income markets revenues was driven by higher rates and currencies revenues and higher spread products revenues. Rates and currencies revenues increased 34%, driven by overall strength in North America and EMEA, primarily due to increased client activity and strong trading results in G10 rates, as well as strength in local markets revenues, particularly in EMEA and Latin America. The increase in spread products revenues was driven by higher credit markets and securitized markets revenues, particularly in North America, as the businesses continued to recover from the lower levels experienced in late 2015, as well as higher municipals revenues in North America.
Equity markets revenues decreased 34%. The prior-year period included a positive valuation adjustment ($140 million) related to certain financing transactions (see “Executive Summary” above). Excluding the adjustment, revenues decreased 23%, driven by lower client activity, a less favorable environment, particularly in derivatives, as well as a comparison to strong performance in Asia in the prior-year period.
Securities services revenues increased 4%. Excluding the impact of FX translation, revenues increased 6%, driven by EMEA and Asia, primarily reflecting increased client activity, higher deposit volumes and improved spreads, partially offset by the absence of revenues from divestitures.

Expenses decreased 1% as a benefit from FX translation, efficiency savings and lower legal and related costs were partially offset by higher compensation expense and higher repositioning charges.
Provisions decreased $403 million to a benefit of $90 million in the current quarter reflecting a net loan loss reserve release of $135 million (compared to a net build of $276 million in the prior-year period) and net credit losses of $45 million ($37 million in the prior-year period), which were largely offset by previously established loan loss reserves. While, in total, the corporate credit portfolio experienced a net reserve release from ratings upgrades, reductions in exposures and improved valuations during the current quarter, the business remains cautious as to the energy sector and potential price volatility. For additional information on Citi’s corporate energy and energy-related exposures, see “Credit Risk—Corporate Credit” below.


23



2016 YTD vs. 2015 YTD
Net income decreased 7%, primarily driven by lower revenues, higher cost of credit and higher expenses.

Revenues decreased 3%, reflecting lower revenues in Banking (decrease of 7% including the gains/(losses) on hedges on accrual loans), partially offset by higher revenues in Markets and securities services (increase of 1%). Excluding the impact of the gains/(losses) on hedges on accrual loans, Banking revenues were largely unchanged.

Within Banking:

Investment banking revenues decreased 8%, largely reflecting the overall industry-wide slowdown in activity levels during the first half of 2016. Advisory revenues decreased 11%, particularly in North America, reflecting strong performance in the prior-year period as well as the lower market activity. Equity underwriting revenues decreased 37%, primarily due to the decline in market activity. Debt underwriting revenues increased 5%, primarily due to increased market activity and a higher wallet share.
Treasury and trade solutions revenues increased 4%. Excluding the impact of FX translation, revenues increased 8%, reflecting growth across all regions. The increase was primarily due to continued growth in transaction volumes, continued growth in deposit balances, improved spreads, particularly in Latin America and North America, and overall growth in trade revenues.
Corporate lending revenues decreased 53%. Excluding the impact of gains/(losses) on hedges on accrual loans, revenues decreased 7%, driven by a lease financing adjustment in the second quarter of 2016 and higher hedging costs, partially offset by continued growth in average loan balances.
Private bank revenues increased 3%, reflecting growth in loan volumes and deposit balances, partially offset by lower capital markets activity and managed investments.

Within Markets and securities services:

Fixed income markets revenues increased 10%, due to strength in North America, Latin America and Asia. The increase in fixed income markets revenues was driven by growth in rates and currencies, partially offset by a decrease in spread products and commodities revenues. Rates and currencies revenues increased 20%, primarily driven by overall G10 products, due to strength in North America, EMEA and Asia. Spread products revenues declined modestly due to a decline in securitized markets revenues, particularly in North America and EMEA, largely offset by an increase in municipals revenues and credit markets revenues. The decline in spread products revenues was primarily due to lower activity levels and a less favorable environment in the early part of 2016.
 
Equity markets revenues decreased 14%, reflecting the impact of lower client volumes in cash equities and derivatives and the strong trading performance in Asia in the prior-year period, partially offset by increased prime finance revenues.
Securities services revenues were largely unchanged as increased client activity and a modest gain on sale of a private equity fund services business in the first quarter of 2016 were offset by the absence of revenues from divestitures and lower assets under custody due to lower market valuations.

Expenses increased 1% as higher repositioning charges and higher compensation expense were largely offset by a benefit from FX translation, efficiency savings and lower legal and related costs.
Provisions increased 22%, primarily reflecting net credit losses of $397 million ($118 million in the prior-year period) and a net loan loss reserve release of $15 million (build of $194 million in the prior-year period). This higher cost of credit included approximately $215 million of net credit losses and an approximately $118 million net loan loss reserve build related to energy and energy-related exposures in the year-to-date period, largely due to low oil prices as well as the impact of regulatory guidance in the first quarter of 2016.





24



CORPORATE/OTHER
Corporate/Other includes certain unallocated costs of global staff functions (including finance, risk, human resources, legal and compliance), other corporate expenses and unallocated global operations and technology expenses, Corporate Treasury and discontinued operations. At September 30, 2016, Corporate/Other had $43 billion of assets, or 2% of Citigroup’s total assets.

 
Third Quarter
% Change
Nine Months
% Change
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Net interest revenue
$
(9
)
$
(64
)
86
 %
$
141

$
(113
)
NM

Non-interest revenue
37

282

(87
)%
287

914

(69
)%
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
28

$
218

(87
)%
$
428

$
801

(47
)%
Total operating expenses
$
458

$
349

31
 %
$
1,323

$
1,277

4
 %
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims






Loss from continuing operations before taxes
$
(430
)
$
(131
)
NM

$
(895
)
$
(476
)
(88
)%
Income taxes (benefits)
(183
)
(314
)
42
 %
(530
)
(871
)
39
 %
Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
(247
)
$
183

NM

$
(365
)
$
395

NM

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes
(30
)
(10
)
NM

(55
)
(9
)
NM

Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
(277
)
$
173

NM

$
(420
)
$
386

NM

Noncontrolling interests
(5
)
3

NM

(10
)
11

NM

Net income (loss)
$
(272
)
$
170

NM

$
(410
)
$
375

NM

NM Not meaningful

3Q16 vs. 3Q15
The net loss was $272 million, compared to net income of $170 million in the prior-year period, due to lower revenues and higher expenses and a higher effective tax rate due to the absence of certain tax benefits in the current quarter.
Revenues decreased 87%, primarily due to the absence of the equity contribution related to China Guangfa Bank (see “Executive Summary” above).
Expenses increased 31%, largely driven by higher expenses related to Citi’s sponsorship of the U.S. Olympic team and higher consulting costs related to the timing of Citi’s resolution plan submission towards the end of the current quarter.

 

2016 YTD vs. 2015 YTD
Year-to-date, Corporate/Other has experienced similar trends to those described above. The net loss was $410 million, compared to net income of $375 million in the prior-year period, reflecting lower revenues, the higher effective tax rate and the absence of the favorable tax impact reflecting the resolution of state and local audits in the second quarter of 2015 and higher expenses.
Revenues decreased 47%, primarily due to the absence of gains on real estate sales, lower gains on debt buybacks and the absence of the equity contribution related to China Guangfa Bank, partially offset by higher investment income.
Expenses increased 4%, largely driven by the higher expenses related to the Olympic sponsorship, the higher consulting costs described above and higher repositioning charges, partially offset by lower legal and related expenses.





25



CITI HOLDINGS
Citi Holdings contains the remaining businesses and portfolios of assets that Citigroup has determined are not central to its core Citicorp businesses. As of September 30, 2016, Citi Holdings assets were approximately $61 billion, a decrease of 48% year-over-year and 8% from June 30, 2016. The decline in assets of $5 billion from June 30, 2016 primarily consisted of divestitures and run-off. As of October 31, 2016, Citi had signed agreements to reduce Citi Holdings GAAP assets by an additional $10 billion, including Citi’s consumer banking businesses in Argentina and Brazil, subject to regulatory approvals and other closing conditions.
Also as of September 30, 2016, consumer assets in Citi Holdings were approximately $54 billion, or approximately 89% of Citi Holdings assets. Of the consumer assets, approximately $31 billion, or 57%, consisted of North America mortgages (residential first mortgages and home equity loans). As of September 30, 2016, Citi Holdings represented approximately 3% of Citi’s GAAP assets and 9% of its risk-weighted assets under Basel III (based on the Advanced Approaches for determining risk-weighted assets).

 
Third Quarter
% Change
Nine Months
% Change
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted
2016
2015
2016
2015
Net interest revenue
$
482

$
1,151

(58
)%
$
1,628

$
3,610

(55
)%
Non-interest revenue
395

530

(25
)
1,567

2,185

(28
)
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
877

$
1,681

(48
)%
$
3,195

$
5,795

(45
)%
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
 
 


 
 


Net credit losses
$
129

$
272

(53
)%
$
374

$
1,075

(65
)%
Credit reserve release
(122
)
(171
)
29

(377
)
(528
)
29

Provision for loan losses
$
7

$
101

(93
)%
$
(3
)
$
547

NM

Provision for benefits and claims
10

161

(94
)
99

490

(80
)
Release for unfunded lending commitments

(19
)
100

(7
)
(22
)
68

Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$
17

$
243

(93
)%
$
89

$
1,015

(91
)%
Total operating expenses
$
826

$
1,374

(40
)%
$
2,512

$
4,121

(39
)%
Income from continuing operations before taxes
$
34

$
64

(47
)%
$
594

$
659

(10
)%
Income taxes (benefits)
(40
)
65

NM

75

354

(79
)%
Income from continuing operations
$
74

$
(1
)
NM

$
519

$
305

70
 %
Noncontrolling interests



$
6

$
1

NM

Net income (loss)
$
74

$
(1
)
NM

$
513

$
304

69
 %
Total revenues, net of interest expense (excluding CVA/DVA)(1)






 
 


Total revenues—as reported
$
877

$
1,681

(48
)%
$
3,195

$
5,795

(45
)%
     CVA/DVA

(25
)
NM


(20
)
NM

Total revenues-excluding CVA/DVA(1)
$
877

$
1,706

(49
)%
$
3,195

$
5,815

(45
)%
Balance sheet data (in billions of dollars)
 
 
 
 
 


Average assets
$
64

$
120

(47
)%
$
71

$
127

(44
)%
Return on average assets
0.46
%
 %
 
0.97
%
0.32
%


Efficiency ratio
94
%
82
 %
 
79
%
71
%


Total EOP assets
$
61

$
117

(48
)
 
 


Total EOP loans
39

60

(35
)
 
 


Total EOP deposits
6

11

(44
)
 
 



(1)
Excludes CVA/DVA in the third quarter and nine months of 2015, consistent with current period presentation. For additional information, see Notes 1 and 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
NM Not meaningful

26



The discussion of the results of operations for Citi Holdings below excludes the impact of CVA/DVA for the third quarter and year-to-date 2015. Presentations of the results of operations, excluding the impact of CVA/DVA, are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of these metrics to the reported results, see the table above.

3Q16 vs. 3Q15
Net income was $74 million, compared to net income of $15 million in the prior-year period, primarily due to lower expenses and lower cost of credit, partially offset by lower revenues.
Revenues decreased 49%, primarily driven by the overall wind-down of the portfolio.
Expenses declined 40%, primarily due to the ongoing decline in assets and modestly lower legal and related and repositioning costs.
Provisions decreased 93% to $17 million, driven by lower net credit losses and a lower provision for benefits and claims reflecting lower insurance-related assets, partially offset by a lower net loan loss reserve release. Net credit losses declined 53%, primarily due to divestiture activity and continued improvements in North America mortgages. The net reserve release decreased 36% to $122 million, primarily due to the impact of asset sales.

 
2016 YTD vs. 2015 YTD
Year-to-date, Citi Holdings has experienced similar trends to
those described above. Net income increased 62% to $513 million, primarily due to lower expenses and lower cost of credit, partially offset by lower revenues.
Revenues decreased 45%, primarily driven by the overall wind-down of the portfolio, partially offset by higher net gains on asset sales.
Expenses declined 39%, primarily due to the ongoing decline in assets and lower legal and related costs, partially offset by higher repositioning costs.
Provisions decreased 91%, driven by the same factors described above. Net credit losses declined 65%, primarily due to overall lower asset levels as well as continued improvements in North America mortgages. The net reserve release decreased 30% to $384 million, primarily due to the impact of asset sales.

Payment Protection Insurance (PPI)
For background information on PPI, see “Citi Holdings” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In August 2016, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued a new consultation paper that included, among other things, a deadline for PPI complaints of June 2019 (a 2018 deadline was proposed previously). Final rules are expected by year-end 2016, with an effective date in March 2017.
During the current quarter, Citi increased its PPI reserves by approximately $70 million ($34 million of which was recorded in Citi Holdings and $36 million of which was recorded in discontinued operations), largely driven by the new proposed deadline for PPI complaints as well as the ongoing level of claims. Citi’s PPI reserve as of the end of the current quarter was $256 million, compared to $262 million as of the end of 2015. Additional reserving actions, if any, during the remainder of 2016 will largely depend on the timing and requirements of the FCA’s final rules.

 



27



OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The table below shows where a discussion of Citi’s various off-balance sheet arrangements may be found in this Form 10-Q. For additional information on Citi’s off-balance sheet arrangements, see “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” and Notes 1, 22 and 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citigroup’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Types of Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Disclosures in this Form 10-Q
Variable interests and other obligations, including contingent obligations, arising from variable interests in nonconsolidated VIEs
See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Letters of credit, and lending and other commitments
See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Guarantees
See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


28



CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Capital is used principally to support assets in Citi’s businesses and to absorb credit, market, and operational losses. Citi primarily generates capital through earnings from its operating businesses. Citi may augment its capital through issuances of common stock, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans, among other issuances.
Further, Citi’s capital levels may also be affected by changes in accounting and regulatory standards as well as the impact of future events on Citi’s business results, such as corporate and asset dispositions.
During the third quarter of 2016, Citi returned a total of approximately $3.0 billion of capital to common shareholders in the form of share repurchases (approximately 56 million common shares) and dividends.
 
Capital Management
Citi’s capital management framework is designed to ensure that Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with each entity’s respective risk profile, management targets, and all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines. For additional information regarding Citi’s capital management, see “Capital Resources—Capital Management” in Citigroup’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Capital Planning and Stress Testing
Citi is subject to an annual assessment by the Federal Reserve Board as to whether Citi has effective capital planning processes as well as sufficient regulatory capital to absorb losses during stressful economic and financial conditions, while also meeting obligations to creditors and counterparties and continuing to serve as a credit intermediary. This annual assessment includes two related programs: the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and Dodd-Frank Act Stress Testing (DFAST). For additional information regarding Citi’s capital planning and stress testing, including potential changes in Citi’s regulatory capital requirements and future CCAR processes, see “Forward-Looking Statements” below and “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards— Capital Planning and Stress Testing” and “Risk Factors—Regulatory Risks” in Citigroup’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In September 2016, the Federal Reserve Board proposed certain revisions to its capital planning and stress testing rules which, if adopted, would become effective with the 2017 CCAR cycle. Among the proposed revisions would be a reduction in the amount of capital a banking organization subject to the quantitative requirements of CCAR may request to distribute in excess of the amount otherwise previously approved under its capital plan. The so-called “de minimis exception” threshold would be lowered from the current 1.0% to 0.25% of Tier 1 Capital, and would be available to these banking organizations,
 
subject to compliance with certain conditions, including 15 days prior notification as to planned execution of the exception and no objection by the Federal Reserve Board within that timeframe.

Current Regulatory Capital Standards
Citi is subject to regulatory capital standards issued by the Federal Reserve Board which constitute the U.S. Basel III rules. These rules establish an integrated capital adequacy framework, encompassing both risk-based capital ratios and leverage ratios. For additional information regarding the risk-based capital ratios, Tier 1 Leverage ratio, and Supplementary Leverage ratio, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards” in Citigroup’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

GSIB Surcharge
The Federal Reserve Board also adopted a rule which imposes a risk-based capital surcharge upon U.S. bank holding companies that are identified as global systemically important bank holding companies (GSIBs), including Citi. GSIB surcharges under the rule initially range from 1.0% to 4.5% of total risk-weighted assets. Citi’s initial GSIB surcharge effective January 1, 2016 is 3.5%. However, Citi expects that its efforts in addressing quantitative measures of its systemic importance have resulted in a reduction of Citi’s GSIB surcharge to 3%, effective January 1, 2017. For additional information regarding the identification of a GSIB and the methodology for annually determining the GSIB surcharge, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards—GSIB Surcharge” in Citigroup’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Transition Provisions
The U.S. Basel III rules contain several differing, largely multi-year transition provisions (i.e., “phase-ins” and “phase-outs”). Citi considers all of these transition provisions as being fully implemented on January 1, 2019 (full implementation). For additional information regarding the transition provisions under the U.S. Basel III rules, including with respect to the GSIB surcharge, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards—Transition Provisions” in Citigroup’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


29



Citigroup’s Capital Resources Under Current Regulatory Standards
During 2015 and thereafter, Citi is required to maintain stated minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios of 4.5%, 6% and 8%, respectively. Citi’s effective minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios during 2016, inclusive of the 25% phase-in of both the 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer and 3.5% GSIB surcharge (all of which is to be composed of Common Equity Tier 1 Capital), are 6%, 7.5%, and 9.5%, respectively. Citi’s effective and stated minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios during 2015 were equivalent at 4.5%, 6%, and 8%, respectively.
 
Furthermore, to be “well capitalized” under current federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a bank holding
company must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital ratio of at least 10%, and not be subject to a Federal Reserve Board directive to maintain higher capital levels.
The following table sets forth the capital tiers, total risk-weighted assets, risk-based capital ratios, quarterly adjusted average total assets, Total Leverage Exposure and leverage ratios under current regulatory standards (reflecting Basel III Transition Arrangements) for Citi as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.


Citigroup Capital Components and Ratios Under Current Regulatory Standards (Basel III Transition Arrangements)
 
September 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars, except ratios
Advanced Approaches
Standardized Approach
 
Advanced Approaches
Standardized Approach
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
$
172,046

$
172,046

 
$
173,862

$
173,862

Tier 1 Capital
182,171

182,171

 
176,420

176,420

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)(1)
208,053

221,024

 
198,746

211,115

Total Risk-Weighted Assets
1,204,384

1,143,625

 
1,190,853

1,138,711

Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio(2)
14.28
%
15.04
%
 
14.60
%
15.27
%
Tier 1 Capital ratio(2)
15.13

15.93

 
14.81

15.49

Total Capital ratio(2)
17.27

19.33

 
16.69

18.54

In millions of dollars, except ratios
September 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Quarterly Adjusted Average Total Assets(3)
 
$
1,777,662

 
 
$
1,732,933

Total Leverage Exposure(4) 
 
2,366,219

 
 
2,326,072

Tier 1 Leverage ratio
 
10.25
%
 
 
10.18
%
Supplementary Leverage ratio
 
7.70

 
 
7.58


(1)
Under the Advanced Approaches framework eligible credit reserves that exceed expected credit losses are eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital to the extent the excess reserves do not exceed 0.6% of credit risk-weighted assets, which differs from the Standardized Approach in which the allowance for credit losses is eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital up to 1.25% of credit risk-weighted assets, with any excess allowance for credit losses being deducted in arriving at credit risk-weighted assets.
(2)
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, Citi’s reportable Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital, and Total Capital ratios were the lower derived under the Basel III Advanced Approaches framework.
(3)
Tier 1 Leverage ratio denominator.
(4)
Supplementary Leverage ratio denominator.

As indicated in the table above, Citigroup’s capital ratios at September 30, 2016 were in excess of the stated and effective minimum requirements under the U.S. Basel III rules. In addition, Citi was also “well capitalized” under current federal bank regulatory agency definitions as of September 30, 2016.





30



Components of Citigroup Capital Under Current Regulatory Standards
(Basel III Advanced Approaches with Transition Arrangements)
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2016
December 31, 2015
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
 
 
Citigroup common stockholders’ equity(1)
$
212,506

$
205,286

Add: Qualifying noncontrolling interests
275

369

Regulatory Capital Adjustments and Deductions:
 
 
Less: Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale (AFS), net of tax(2)(3)
649

(544
)
Less: Defined benefit plans liability adjustment, net of tax(3)
(2,238
)
(3,070
)
Less: Accumulated net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax(4)
(232
)
(617
)
Less: Cumulative unrealized net gain related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities
   attributable to own creditworthiness, net of tax(3)(5)
201

176

Less: Intangible assets:
 
 
Goodwill, net of related deferred tax liabilities (DTLs)(6)
21,763

21,980

Identifiable intangible assets other than mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), net of related
   DTLs(3)(7)
3,106

1,434

Less: Defined benefit pension plan net assets(3)
535

318

Less: Deferred tax assets (DTAs) arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general
   business credit carry-forwards(3)(8)
13,502

9,464

Less: Excess over 10%/15% limitations for other DTAs, certain common stock investments,
  and MSRs(3)(8)(9)
3,449

2,652

Total Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
$
172,046

$
173,862

Additional Tier 1 Capital
 
 
Qualifying perpetual preferred stock(1)
$
19,069

$
16,571

Qualifying trust preferred securities(10)
1,369

1,707

Qualifying noncontrolling interests
18

12

Regulatory Capital Adjustment and Deductions:
 
 
Less: Cumulative unrealized net gain related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities
   attributable to own creditworthiness, net of tax(3)(5)
134

265

Less: Defined benefit pension plan net assets(3)
356

476

Less: DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general
   business credit carry-forwards(3)(8)
9,001

14,195

Less: Permitted ownership interests in covered funds(11)
759

567

Less: Minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries(12)
81

229

Total Additional Tier 1 Capital
$
10,125

$
2,558

Total Tier 1 Capital (Common Equity Tier 1 Capital + Additional Tier 1 Capital)
$
182,171

$
176,420

Tier 2 Capital
 
 
Qualifying subordinated debt(13)(14)
$
25,007

$
21,370

Qualifying trust preferred securities(10)
324


Qualifying noncontrolling interests
24

17

Excess of eligible credit reserves over expected credit losses(15)
605

1,163

Regulatory Capital Adjustment and Deduction:
 
 
Add: Unrealized gains on AFS equity exposures includable in Tier 2 Capital
3

5

Less: Minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries(12)
81

229

Total Tier 2 Capital
$
25,882

$
22,326

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)
$
208,053

$
198,746


31



Citigroup Risk-Weighted Assets Under Current Regulatory Standards
(Basel III Advanced Approaches with Transition Arrangements)
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2016
December 31, 2015
Credit Risk(16)
$
796,200

$
791,036

Market Risk
71,070

74,817

Operational Risk
337,114

325,000

Total Risk-Weighted Assets
$
1,204,384

$
1,190,853


(1)
Issuance costs of $184 million and $147 million related to preferred stock outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, are excluded from common stockholders’ equity and netted against preferred stock in accordance with Federal Reserve Board regulatory reporting requirements, which differ from those under U.S. GAAP.
(2)
In addition, includes the net amount of unamortized loss on HTM securities. This amount relates to securities that were previously transferred from AFS to HTM, and non-credit related factors such as changes in interest rates and liquidity spreads for HTM securities with other-than-temporary impairment.
(3)
The transition arrangements for significant regulatory capital adjustments and deductions impacting Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and/or Additional Tier 1 Capital are set forth in the chart entitled “Basel III Transition Arrangements: Significant Regulatory Capital Adjustments and Deductions”, as presented in Citigroup’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(4)
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital is adjusted for accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges included in AOCI that relate to the hedging of items not recognized at fair value on the balance sheet.
(5)
The cumulative impact of changes in Citigroup’s own creditworthiness in valuing liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected and own-credit valuation adjustments on derivatives are excluded from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, in accordance with the U.S. Basel III rules.
(6)
Includes goodwill “embedded” in the valuation of significant common stock investments in unconsolidated financial institutions.
(7)
Identifiable intangible assets other than MSRs increased by approximately $2.2 billion as a result of the acquisition of the Costco cards portfolio, as well as the renewal and extension of the co-branded credit card program agreement with American Airlines. For additional information, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(8)
Of Citi’s approximately $45.4 billion of net DTAs at September 30, 2016, approximately $21.2 billion of such assets were includable in regulatory capital pursuant to the U.S. Basel III rules, while approximately $24.2 billion of such assets were excluded in arriving at regulatory capital. Comprising the excluded net DTAs was an aggregate of approximately $26.0 billion of net DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general business credit carry-forwards as well as temporary differences, of which $17.0 billion were deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and $9.0 billion were deducted from Additional Tier 1 Capital. Serving to reduce the approximately $26.0 billion of aggregate excluded net DTAs was approximately $1.8 billion of net DTLs primarily associated with goodwill and certain other intangible assets. Separately, under the U.S. Basel III rules, goodwill and these other intangible assets are deducted net of associated DTLs in arriving at Common Equity Tier 1 Capital.
(9)
Assets subject to 10%/15% limitations include MSRs, DTAs arising from temporary differences and significant common stock investments in unconsolidated financial institutions. At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the deduction related only to DTAs arising from temporary differences that exceeded the 10% limitation.
(10)
Represents Citigroup Capital XIII trust preferred securities, which are permanently grandfathered as Tier 1 Capital under the U.S. Basel III rules, as well as non-grandfathered trust preferred securities which are eligible for inclusion in Tier 1 Capital during 2015 in an amount up to 25% of the aggregate outstanding principal amounts of such issuances as of January 1, 2014. The remaining 75% of non-grandfathered trust preferred securities are eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital during 2015 in accordance with the transition arrangements for non-qualifying capital instruments under the U.S. Basel III rules. As of December 31, 2015, however, the entire amount of non-grandfathered trust preferred securities was included within Tier 1 Capital, as the amounts outstanding did not exceed the respective threshold for exclusion from Tier 1 Capital. Effective January 1, 2016, non-grandfathered trust preferred securities are not eligible for inclusion in Tier 1 Capital, but are eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital subject to full phase-out by January 1, 2022. During 2016, non-grandfathered trust preferred securities are eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital in an amount up to 60% of the aggregate outstanding principal amounts of such issuances as of January 1, 2014.
(11)
Effective July 2015, banking entities are required to be in compliance with the Volcker Rule of the Dodd-Frank Act that prohibits conducting certain proprietary investment activities and limits their ownership of, and relationships with, covered funds. Accordingly, Citi is required by the Volcker Rule to deduct from Tier 1 Capital all permitted ownership interests in covered funds that were acquired after December 31, 2013.
(12)
50% of the minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries must be deducted from each of Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital.
(13)
Under the transition arrangements of the U.S. Basel III rules, non-qualifying subordinated debt issuances which consist of those with a fixed-to-floating rate step-up feature where the call/step-up date has not passed are eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital during 2015 up to 25% of the aggregate outstanding principal amounts of such issuances as of January 1, 2014. Effective January 1, 2016, non-qualifying subordinated debt issuances are not eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital.
(14)
At the beginning of each of the last five years of the life of each qualifying subordinated debt instrument, the carrying amount that is eligible to be included in Tier 2 Capital is reduced by 20% of the original amount of the instrument (net of redemptions), in accordance with the U.S. Basel III rules.
(15)
Advanced Approaches banking organizations are permitted to include in Tier 2 Capital eligible credit reserves that exceed expected credit losses to the extent that the excess reserves do not exceed 0.6% of credit risk-weighted assets.
(16)
Under the U.S. Basel III rules, credit risk-weighted assets during the transition period reflect the effects of transitional arrangements related to regulatory capital adjustments and deductions and, as a result, will differ from credit risk-weighted assets derived under full implementation of the rules.

32



Citigroup Capital Rollforward Under Current Regulatory Standards
(Basel III Advanced Approaches with Transition Arrangements)
In millions of dollars
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
Nine Months Ended  
  September 30, 2016
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
$
171,594

$
173,862

Net income
3,840

11,339

Common and preferred stock dividends declared
(689
)
(1,517
)
Net increase in treasury stock
(2,530
)
(4,392
)
Net change in common stock and additional paid-in capital(1)
144

(376
)
Net decrease in foreign currency translation adjustment net of hedges, net of tax
(375
)
(273
)
Net change in unrealized gains/losses on securities AFS, net of tax
(259
)
1,336

Net change in defined benefit plans liability adjustment, net of tax
7

(1,312
)
Net change in adjustment related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities
    attributable to own creditworthiness, net of tax
(57
)
(20
)
Net decrease in goodwill, net of related deferred tax liabilities (DTLs)
91

217

Net change in identifiable intangible assets other than mortgage servicing rights
    (MSRs), net of related DTLs
109

(1,672
)
Net change in defined benefit pension plan net assets
43

(217
)
Net change in deferred tax assets (DTAs) arising from net operating loss, foreign
    tax credit and general business credit carry-forwards
263

(4,038
)
Net increase in excess over 10%/15% limitations for other DTAs, certain common
    stock investments and MSRs
(133
)
(797
)
Other
(2
)
(94
)
Net change in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
$
452

$
(1,816
)
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Balance, end of period
$
172,046

$
172,046

Additional Tier 1 Capital
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
$
9,688

$
2,558

Net increase in qualifying perpetual preferred stock(1)

2,498

Net change in qualifying trust preferred securities
1

(338
)
Net change in adjustment related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities
    attributable to own creditworthiness, net of tax
96

131

Net decrease in defined benefit pension plan net assets
30

120

Net decrease in DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general
    business credit carry-forwards
176

5,194

Net change in permitted ownership interests in covered funds
30

(192
)
Other
104

154

Net increase in Additional Tier 1 Capital
$
437

$
7,567

Tier 1 Capital Balance, end of period
$
182,171

$
182,171

Tier 2 Capital
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
$
24,862

$
22,326

Net increase in qualifying subordinated debt
1,325

3,637

Net change in qualifying trust preferred securities
(4
)
324

Net decrease in excess of eligible credit reserves over expected credit losses
(406
)
(558
)
Other
105

153

Net increase in Tier 2 Capital
$
1,020

$
3,556

Tier 2 Capital Balance, end of period
$
25,882

$
25,882

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)
$
208,053

$
208,053


(1)
During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, Citi issued approximately $2.5 billion of qualifying perpetual preferred stock with issuance costs of $37 million. In accordance with Federal Reserve Board regulatory reporting requirements, which differ from those under U.S. GAAP, such issuance costs are excluded from common stockholders’ equity and netted against preferred stock.



 


33



Citigroup Risk-Weighted Assets Rollforward Under Current Regulatory Standards
(Basel III Advanced Approaches with Transition Arrangements)
In millions of dollars
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
Nine Months Ended  
  September 30, 2016
 Total Risk-Weighted Assets, beginning of period
$
1,204,408

$
1,190,853

Changes in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets
 
 
Net decrease in retail exposures(1)
(5,468
)
(14,660
)
Net decrease in wholesale exposures(2)
(4,246
)
(522
)
Net decrease in repo-style transactions(3)
(3,995
)
(3,360
)
Net increase in securitization exposures
694

405

Net decrease in equity exposures(4)
(2,089
)
(1,687
)
Net change in over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives(5)
(2,145
)
7,541

Net increase in derivatives CVA(6)
4,278

17,052

Net increase in other exposures(7)
449

1,068

Net decrease in supervisory 6% multiplier(8)
(1,008
)
(673
)
Net change in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets
$
(13,530
)
$
5,164

Changes in Market Risk-Weighted Assets
 
 
Net increase in risk levels(9)
$
2,850

$
413

Net decrease due to model and methodology updates(10)
(1,458
)
(4,160
)
Net change in Market Risk-Weighted Assets
$
1,392

$
(3,747
)
Net increase in Operational Risk-Weighted Assets(11)
$
12,114

$
12,114

Total Risk-Weighted Assets, end of period
$
1,204,384

$
1,204,384


(1)
Retail exposures decreased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, in part, due to residential mortgage loan sales and repayments, and divestitures of certain Citi Holdings portfolios. The decrease in retail exposures during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was partially offset by the acquisition of the Costco cards portfolio.
(2)
Wholesale exposures decreased during the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to decreases in commercial loans and loan commitments. Wholesale exposures decreased during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to decreases in loan commitments, partially offset by increases in securities AFS and commercial loans.
(3)
Repo-style transactions decreased during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to exposure decreases and model enhancements.
(4)
Equity exposures decreased during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the sale of Citi’s investment in China Guangfa Bank.
(5)
OTC derivatives decreased during the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to changes in fair value. OTC derivatives increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily driven by increased trade volume and model enhancements.
(6)
Derivatives CVA increased during the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily driven by volatility and rating changes. Derivatives CVA increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily driven by increased volatility, trade volume and model enhancements.
(7)
Other exposures include cleared transactions, unsettled transactions, assets other than those reportable in specific exposure categories and non-material portfolios.
(8)
Supervisory 6% multiplier does not apply to derivatives CVA.
(9)
Risk levels increased during the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to an increase in positions subject to standard specific risk charges as well as securitization charges, partially offset by a reduction in positions subject to de minimis charges.
(10)
Risk-weighted assets declined during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to changes in model inputs regarding volatility and the correlation between market risk factors.
(11)
During the third quarter of 2016, operational risk-weighted assets increased by $12.1 billion due to the implementation of certain enhancements to Citi’s Advanced Measurement Approaches model.
  


34



Capital Resources of Citigroup’s Subsidiary U.S. Depository Institutions Under Current Regulatory Standards
Citigroup’s subsidiary U.S. depository institutions are also subject to regulatory capital standards issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the standards of the Federal Reserve Board.
During 2016, Citi’s primary subsidiary U.S. depository institution, Citibank, N.A. (Citibank), is subject to effective minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios, inclusive of the 25% phase-in of the 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer, of 5.125%, 6.625%
 
and 8.625%, respectively. Citibank’s effective and stated minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios during 2015 were equivalent at 4.5%, 6%, and 8%, respectively.
The following table sets forth the capital tiers, total risk-weighted assets, risk-based capital ratios, quarterly adjusted average total assets, Total Leverage Exposure and leverage ratios under current regulatory standards (reflecting Basel III Transition Arrangements) for Citibank, Citi’s primary subsidiary U.S. depository institution, as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Citibank Capital Components and Ratios Under Current Regulatory Standards (Basel III Transition Arrangements)
 
September 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars, except ratios
Advanced Approaches
Standardized Approach
 
Advanced Approaches
Standardized Approach
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
$
129,444

$
129,444

 
$
127,323

$
127,323

Tier 1 Capital
129,493

129,493

 
127,323

127,323

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)(1)
140,425

152,005

 
138,762

149,749

Total Risk-Weighted Assets
991,276

999,542

 
898,769

999,014

Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio(2)(3)
13.06
%
12.95
%
 
14.17
%
12.74
%
Tier 1 Capital ratio(2)(3)
13.06

12.96

 
14.17

12.74

Total Capital ratio(2)(3)
14.17

15.21

 
15.44

14.99

In millions of dollars, except ratios
September 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Quarterly Adjusted Average Total Assets(4)
 
$
1,345,604

 
 
$
1,298,560

Total Leverage Exposure(5) 
 
1,885,412

 
 
1,838,941

Tier 1 Leverage ratio(3)
 
9.62
%
 
 
9.80
%
Supplementary Leverage ratio
 
6.87

 
 
6.92


(1)
Under the Advanced Approaches framework eligible credit reserves that exceed expected credit losses are eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital to the extent the excess reserves do not exceed 0.6% of credit risk-weighted assets, which differs from the Standardized Approach in which the allowance for credit losses is eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital up to 1.25% of credit risk-weighted assets, with any excess allowance for credit losses being deducted in arriving at credit risk-weighted assets.
(2)
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, Citibank’s reportable Common Equity Tier 1 Capital and Tier 1 Capital ratios were the lower derived under the Basel III Standardized Approach framework. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, Citibank’s reportable Total Capital ratio was the lower derived under the Basel III Advanced Approaches framework and the Basel III Standardized Approach framework, respectively.
(3)
Beginning January 1, 2015, Citibank must maintain minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital, Total Capital, and Tier 1 Leverage ratios of 6.5%, 8%, 10% and 5%, respectively, to be considered “well capitalized” under the revised Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) regulations applicable to insured depository institutions as established by the U.S. Basel III rules. For additional information, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards—Prompt Corrective Action Framework” in Citigroup’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(4)
Tier 1 Leverage ratio denominator.
(5)
Supplementary Leverage ratio denominator.

As indicated in the table above, Citibank’s capital ratios at September 30, 2016 were in excess of the stated and effective minimum requirements under the U.S. Basel III rules. In addition, Citibank was also “well capitalized” as of September 30, 2016 under the revised PCA regulations which became effective January 1, 2015.



35



Impact of Changes on Citigroup and Citibank Capital Ratios Under Current Regulatory Capital Standards
The following tables present the estimated sensitivity of Citigroup’s and Citibank’s capital ratios to changes of $100 million in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital (numerator), and changes of $1 billion in
Advanced Approaches and Standardized Approach risk-weighted assets, quarterly adjusted average total assets, as well as Total Leverage Exposure (denominator), under current regulatory capital standards (reflecting Basel III Transition Arrangements), as of September 30, 2016.
 
This information is provided for the purpose of analyzing the impact that a change in Citigroup’s or Citibank’s financial position or results of operations could have on these ratios. These sensitivities only consider a single change to either a component of capital, risk-weighted assets, quarterly adjusted average total assets, or Total Leverage Exposure. Accordingly, an event that affects more than one factor may have a larger basis point impact than is reflected in these tables.



Impact of Changes on Citigroup and Citibank Risk-Based Capital Ratios (Basel III Transition Arrangements)
 
Common Equity
Tier 1 Capital ratio
Tier 1 Capital ratio
Total Capital ratio
In basis points
Impact of
$100 million
change in
Common Equity
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of
$1 billion
change in risk-
weighted assets
Impact of
$100 million
change in
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of
$1 billion
change in risk-
weighted assets
Impact of
$100 million
change in
Total Capital
Impact of
$1 billion
change in risk-
weighted assets
Citigroup
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advanced Approaches
0.8
1.2
0.8
1.3
0.8
1.4
Standardized Approach
0.9
1.3
0.9
1.4
0.9
1.7
Citibank
 
 
 
 
 
 
Advanced Approaches
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.4
Standardized Approach
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.5

Impact of Changes on Citigroup and Citibank Leverage Ratios (Basel III Transition Arrangements)
 
Tier 1 Leverage ratio
Supplementary Leverage ratio
In basis points
Impact of
$100 million
change in
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of
$1 billion
change in quarterly adjusted average total assets
Impact of
$100 million
change in
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of
$1 billion
change in Total Leverage Exposure
Citigroup
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.3
Citibank
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.4

Citigroup Broker-Dealer Subsidiaries
At September 30, 2016, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., a U.S. broker-dealer registered with the SEC that is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, had net capital, computed in accordance with the SEC’s net capital rule, of approximately $8.5 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement by approximately $6.8 billion.
Moreover, Citigroup Global Markets Limited, a broker-dealer registered with the United Kingdom’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) that is also an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, had total capital of $17.0 billion at September 30, 2016, which exceeded the PRA's minimum regulatory capital requirements.




 
In addition, certain of Citi’s other broker-dealer
subsidiaries are subject to regulation in the countries in which they do business, including requirements to maintain specified levels of net capital or its equivalent. Citigroup’s other broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with
their capital requirements at September 30, 2016.












36



Basel III (Full Implementation)

Citigroup’s Capital Resources Under Basel III
(Full Implementation)
Citi currently estimates that its effective minimum Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratio requirements under the U.S. Basel III rules, on a fully implemented basis, inclusive of the 2.5% Capital Conservation Buffer and the Countercyclical Capital Buffer at its current level of 0%, as well as assuming a 3% GSIB surcharge, may be 10%, 11.5% and 13.5%, respectively.
Further, under the U.S. Basel III rules, Citi must also comply with a 4% minimum Tier 1 Leverage ratio requirement and an effective 5% minimum Supplementary Leverage ratio requirement.
The following table sets forth the capital tiers, total risk-weighted assets, risk-based capital ratios, quarterly adjusted average total assets, Total Leverage Exposure and leverage ratios, assuming full implementation under the U.S. Basel III rules, for Citi as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Citigroup Capital Components and Ratios Under Basel III (Full Implementation)
 
September 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars, except ratios
Advanced Approaches
Standardized Approach
 
Advanced Approaches
Standardized Approach
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
$
155,132

$
155,132

 
$
146,865

$
146,865

Tier 1 Capital
174,760

174,760

 
164,036

164,036

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)(1)
200,654

213,833

 
186,097

198,655

Total Risk-Weighted Assets
1,228,283

1,166,379

 
1,216,277

1,162,884

Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio(2)(3)
12.63
%
13.30
%
 
12.07
%
12.63
%
Tier 1 Capital ratio(2)(3)
14.23

14.98

 
13.49

14.11

Total Capital ratio(2)(3)
16.34

18.33

 
15.30

17.08

In millions of dollars, except ratios
September 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Quarterly Adjusted Average Total Assets(4)
 
$
1,771,963

 
 
$
1,724,710

Total Leverage Exposure(5) 
 
2,360,520

 
 
2,317,849

Tier 1 Leverage ratio(3)
 
9.86
%
 
 
9.51
%
Supplementary Leverage ratio(3)
 
7.40

 
 
7.08


(1)
Under the Advanced Approaches framework eligible credit reserves that exceed expected credit losses are eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital to the extent the excess reserves do not exceed 0.6% of credit risk-weighted assets, which differs from the Standardized Approach in which the allowance for credit losses is eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital up to 1.25% of credit risk-weighted assets, with any excess allowance for credit losses being deducted in arriving at credit risk-weighted assets.
(2)
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, Tier 1 Capital, and Total Capital ratios were the lower derived under the Basel III Advanced Approaches framework.
(3)
Citi’s Basel III capital ratios and related components, on a fully implemented basis, are non-GAAP financial measures.
(4)
Tier 1 Leverage ratio denominator.
(5)
Supplementary Leverage ratio denominator.



37



Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio
Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio was 12.6% at September 30, 2016, compared to 12.5% at June 30, 2016 and 12.1% at December 31, 2015 (all based on application of the Advanced Approaches for determining total risk-weighted assets). The quarter-over-quarter increase in the ratio was primarily due to quarterly net income of $3.8 billion and a decrease in credit risk-weighted assets, offset in part by the return of approximately $3.0 billion of capital to common shareholders and an increase in operational risk-weighted assets resulting from the implementation of certain enhancements to Citi’s Advanced Measurement Approaches model. The increase in Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio from year-end 2015 reflected continued growth in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital resulting from net income of $11.3 billion and the favorable effects of $3.2 billion attributable to DTA utilization, offset in part by the return of approximately $5.9 billion of capital to common shareholders and the noted increase in operational risk-weighted assets.


38



Components of Citigroup Capital Under Basel III (Advanced Approaches with Full Implementation)
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2016
December 31, 2015
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
 
 
Citigroup common stockholders’ equity(1)
$
212,506

$
205,286

Add: Qualifying noncontrolling interests
140

145

Regulatory Capital Adjustments and Deductions:
 
 
Less: Accumulated net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax(2)
(232
)
(617
)
Less: Cumulative unrealized net gain related to changes in fair value of
   financial liabilities attributable to own creditworthiness, net of tax(3)
335

441

Less: Intangible assets:
 
 
Goodwill, net of related deferred tax liabilities (DTLs)(4)
21,763

21,980

Identifiable intangible assets other than mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), net of related DTLs(5)
5,177

3,586

Less: Defined benefit pension plan net assets
891

794

Less: Deferred tax assets (DTAs) arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general
   business credit carry-forwards(6)
22,503

23,659

Less: Excess over 10%/15% limitations for other DTAs, certain common stock investments,
  and MSRs(6)(7)
7,077

8,723

Total Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
$
155,132

$
146,865

Additional Tier 1 Capital
 
 
Qualifying perpetual preferred stock(1)
$
19,069

$
16,571

Qualifying trust preferred securities(8)
1,369

1,365

Qualifying noncontrolling interests
30

31

Regulatory Capital Deductions:
 
 
Less: Permitted ownership interests in covered funds(9)
759

567

Less: Minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries(10)
81

229

Total Additional Tier 1 Capital
$
19,628

$
17,171

Total Tier 1 Capital (Common Equity Tier 1 Capital + Additional Tier 1 Capital)
$
174,760

$
164,036

Tier 2 Capital
 
 
Qualifying subordinated debt(11)
$
25,007

$
20,744

Qualifying trust preferred securities(12)
324

342

Qualifying noncontrolling interests
39

41

Excess of eligible credit reserves over expected credit losses(13)
605

1,163

Regulatory Capital Deduction:
 
 
Less: Minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries(10)
81

229

Total Tier 2 Capital
$
25,894

$
22,061

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)(14)
$
200,654

$
186,097


(1)
Issuance costs of $184 million and $147 million related to preferred stock outstanding at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, are excluded from common stockholders’ equity and netted against preferred stock in accordance with Federal Reserve Board regulatory reporting requirements, which differ from those under U.S. GAAP.
(2)
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital is adjusted for accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges included in AOCI that relate to the hedging of items not recognized at fair value on the balance sheet.
(3)
The cumulative impact of changes in Citigroup’s own creditworthiness in valuing liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected and own-credit valuation adjustments on derivatives are excluded from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, in accordance with the U.S. Basel III rules.
(4)
Includes goodwill “embedded” in the valuation of significant common stock investments in unconsolidated financial institutions.
(5)
Identifiable intangible assets other than MSRs increased by approximately $2.2 billion as a result of the acquisition of the Costco cards portfolio, as well as the renewal and extension of the co-branded credit card program agreement with American Airlines. For additional information, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(6)
Of Citi’s approximately $45.4 billion of net DTAs at September 30, 2016, approximately $17.6 billion of such assets were includable in regulatory capital pursuant to the U.S. Basel III rules, while approximately $27.8 billion of such assets were excluded in arriving at Common Equity Tier 1 Capital. Comprising the excluded net DTAs was an aggregate of approximately $29.6 billion of net DTAs arising from net operating loss, foreign tax credit and general business credit carry-forwards as well as temporary differences that were deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital. Serving to reduce the approximately $29.6 billion of aggregate excluded net DTAs was approximately $1.8 billion of net DTLs primarily associated with goodwill and certain other intangible assets. Separately, under the U.S. Basel III rules, goodwill and these other intangible assets are deducted net of associated DTLs in arriving at Common Equity Tier 1 Capital.

39



(7)
Assets subject to 10%/15% limitations include MSRs, DTAs arising from temporary differences and significant common stock investments in unconsolidated financial institutions. At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the deduction related only to DTAs arising from temporary differences that exceeded the 10% limitation.
(8)
Represents Citigroup Capital XIII trust preferred securities, which are permanently grandfathered as Tier 1 Capital under the U.S. Basel III rules.
(9)
Effective July 2015, banking entities are required to be in compliance with the Volcker Rule of the Dodd-Frank Act that prohibits conducting certain proprietary investment activities and limits their ownership of, and relationships with, covered funds. Accordingly, Citi is required by the Volcker Rule to deduct from Tier 1 Capital all permitted ownership interests in covered funds that were acquired after December 31, 2013.
(10)
50% of the minimum regulatory capital requirements of insurance underwriting subsidiaries must be deducted from each of Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital.
(11)
At the beginning of each of the last five years of the life of each qualifying subordinated debt instrument, the carrying amount that is eligible to be included in Tier 2 Capital is reduced by 20% of the original amount of the instrument (net of redemptions), in accordance with the U.S. Basel III rules.
(12)
Represents the amount of non-grandfathered trust preferred securities eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 Capital under the U.S. Basel III rules, which will be fully phased-out of Tier 2 Capital by January 1, 2022.
(13)
Advanced Approaches banking organizations are permitted to include in Tier 2 Capital eligible credit reserves that exceed expected credit losses to the extent that the excess reserves do not exceed 0.6% of credit risk-weighted assets.
(14)
Total Capital as calculated under Advanced Approaches, which differs from the Standardized Approach in the treatment of the amount of eligible credit reserves includable in Tier 2 Capital.









40



Citigroup Capital Rollforward Under Basel III (Advanced Approaches with Full Implementation)
In millions of dollars
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
Nine Months Ended  
  September 30, 2016
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
$
154,534

$
146,865

Net income
3,840

11,339

Common and preferred stock dividends declared
(689
)
(1,517
)
Net increase in treasury stock
(2,530
)
(4,392
)
Net change in common stock and additional paid-in capital(1)
144

(376
)
Net decrease in foreign currency translation adjustment net of hedges, net of tax
(375
)
(273
)
Net change in unrealized gains/losses on securities AFS, net of tax
(432
)
2,529

Net change in defined benefit plans liability adjustment, net of tax
12

(480
)
Net change in adjustment related to changes in fair value of financial liabilities
    attributable to own creditworthiness, net of tax
39

111

Net decrease in goodwill, net of related deferred tax liabilities (DTLs)
91

217

Net change in identifiable intangible assets other than mortgage servicing rights (MSRs),
    net of related DTLs
181

(1,591
)
Net change in defined benefit pension plan net assets
73

(97
)
Net decrease in deferred tax assets (DTAs) arising from net operating loss, foreign
    tax credit and general business credit carry-forwards
439

1,156

Net change in excess over 10%/15% limitations for other DTAs, certain common stock
    investments and MSRs
(201
)
1,646

Other
6

(5
)
Net increase in Common Equity Tier 1 Capital
$
598

$
8,267

Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Balance, end of period
$
155,132

$
155,132

Additional Tier 1 Capital
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
$
19,493

$
17,171

Net increase in qualifying perpetual preferred stock(1)

2,498

Net increase in qualifying trust preferred securities
1

4

Net change in permitted ownership interests in covered funds
30

(192
)
Other
104

147

Net increase in Additional Tier 1 Capital
$
135

$
2,457

Tier 1 Capital Balance, end of period
$
174,760

$
174,760

Tier 2 Capital
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
$
24,893

$
22,061

Net increase in qualifying subordinated debt
1,306

4,263

Net decrease in excess of eligible credit reserves over expected credit losses
(406
)
(558
)
Other
101

128

Net increase in Tier 2 Capital
$
1,001

$
3,833

Tier 2 Capital Balance, end of period
$
25,894

$
25,894

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)
$
200,654

$
200,654


(1)
During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, Citi issued approximately $2.5 billion of qualifying perpetual preferred stock with issuance costs of $37 million. In accordance with Federal Reserve Board regulatory reporting requirements, which differ from those under U.S. GAAP, such issuance costs are excluded from common stockholders’ equity and netted against preferred stock.
 









41



Citigroup Risk-Weighted Assets Under Basel III (Full Implementation) at September 30, 2016
 
Advanced Approaches
 
Standardized Approach
In millions of dollars
Citicorp
Citi Holdings
Total
 
Citicorp
Citi Holdings
Total
Credit Risk
$
756,110

$
63,989

$
820,099

 
$
1,032,872

$
61,845

$
1,094,717

Market Risk
69,838

1,232

71,070

 
70,294

1,368

71,662

Operational Risk
288,035

49,079

337,114

 



Total Risk-Weighted Assets
$
1,113,983

$
114,300

$
1,228,283

 
$
1,103,166

$
63,213

$
1,166,379


 
Citigroup Risk-Weighted Assets Under Basel III (Full Implementation) at December 31, 2015
 
Advanced Approaches
 
Standardized Approach
In millions of dollars
Citicorp
Citi Holdings
Total
 
Citicorp
Citi Holdings
Total
Credit Risk
$
731,515

$
84,945

$
816,460

 
$
1,008,951

$
78,748

$
1,087,699

Market Risk
70,701

4,116

74,817

 
71,015

4,170

75,185

Operational Risk
275,921

49,079

325,000

 



Total Risk-Weighted Assets
$
1,078,137

$
138,140

$
1,216,277

 
$
1,079,966

$
82,918

$
1,162,884


Total risk-weighted assets under the Basel III Advanced Approaches increased from year-end 2015 substantially due to $12.1 billion in additional operational risk-weighted assets resulting from the implementation of certain enhancements to Citi’s Advanced Measurement Approaches model during the third quarter of 2016.
Moreover, while credit risk-weighted assets under both the Basel III Advanced Approaches and Standardized Approach grew during the first nine months of 2016, although to a varying extent, these increases were partially offset by a relatively comparable decline in market risk-weighted assets. Credit risk-weighted assets increased on a net basis under both approaches over this period due to several factors, including higher derivative exposures and the acquisition of the Costco cards portfolio, partially offset by divestitures of certain consumer businesses in Citi Holdings and dispositions of other non-strategic assets. Further contributing significantly to the increase in Basel III Advanced Approaches risk-weighted assets during the first nine months of 2016 was an increase in derivatives CVA.



42



Citigroup Risk-Weighted Assets Rollforward (Basel III Advanced Approaches with Full Implementation)
In millions of dollars
Three Months Ended 
 September 30, 2016
Nine Months Ended  
  September 30, 2016
 Total Risk-Weighted Assets, beginning of period
$
1,232,856

$
1,216,277

Changes in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets
 
 
Net decrease in retail exposures(1)
(5,468
)
(14,660
)
Net decrease in wholesale exposures(2)
(4,246
)
(522
)
Net decrease in repo-style transactions(3)
(3,995
)
(3,360
)
Net increase in securitization exposures
694

405

Net decrease in equity exposures(4)
(6,424
)
(5,875
)
Net change in over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives(5)
(2,145
)
7,541

Net increase in derivatives CVA(6)
4,278

17,052

Net increase in other exposures(7)
493

3,817

Net decrease in supervisory 6% multiplier(8)
(1,266
)
(759
)
Net change in Credit Risk-Weighted Assets
$
(18,079
)
$
3,639

Changes in Market Risk-Weighted Assets
 
 
Net increase in risk levels(9)
$
2,850

$
413

Net decrease due to model and methodology updates(10)
(1,458
)
(4,160
)
Net change in Market Risk-Weighted Assets
$
1,392

$
(3,747
)
Net increase in Operational Risk-Weighted Assets(11)
$
12,114

$
12,114

Total Risk-Weighted Assets, end of period
$
1,228,283

$
1,228,283


(1)
Retail exposures decreased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, in part, due to residential mortgage loan sales and repayments, and divestitures of certain Citi Holdings portfolios. The decrease in retail exposures during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was partially offset by the acquisition of the Costco cards portfolio.
(2)
Wholesale exposures decreased during the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to decreases in commercial loans and loan commitments. Wholesale exposures decreased during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to decreases in loan commitments, partially offset by increases in securities AFS and commercial loans.
(3)
Repo-style transactions decreased during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to exposure decreases and model enhancements.
(4)
Equity exposures decreased during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the sale of Citi’s investment in China Guangfa Bank.
(5)
OTC derivatives decreased during the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to changes in fair value. OTC derivatives increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily driven by increased trade volume and model enhancements.
(6)
Derivatives CVA increased during the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily driven by volatility and rating changes. Derivatives CVA increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily driven by increased volatility, trade volume and model enhancements.
(7)
Other exposures include cleared transactions, unsettled transactions, assets other than those reportable in specific exposure categories and non-material portfolios.
(8)
Supervisory 6% multiplier does not apply to derivatives CVA.
(9)
Risk levels increased during the three months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to an increase in positions subject to standard specific risk charges as well as securitization charges, partially offset by a reduction in positions subject to de minimis charges.
(10)
Risk-weighted assets declined during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to changes in model inputs regarding volatility and the correlation between market risk factors.
(11)
During the third quarter of 2016, operational risk-weighted assets increased by $12.1 billion due to the implementation of certain enhancements to Citi’s Advanced Measurement Approaches model.

  















  


43



Supplementary Leverage Ratio
Citigroup’s Supplementary Leverage ratio was 7.4% for the third quarter of 2016, compared to 7.5% for the second quarter of 2016 and 7.1% for the fourth quarter of 2015. While Tier 1 Capital increased on a net basis quarter-over-quarter, nonetheless the decrease in the ratio was principally driven by an overall increase in Total Leverage Exposure, which was largely attributable to the growth in average on-balance sheet assets as well as increases in the potential future exposure on derivative contracts and unconditionally cancellable commitments. The increase in the ratio from the fourth quarter of 2015 was principally
 
driven by an increase in Tier 1 Capital attributable largely to net income of $11.3 billion and $2.5 billion of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock issuances, offset in part by the return of capital to common shareholders and an overall increase in Total Leverage Exposure.
The following table sets forth Citi’s Supplementary Leverage ratio and related components, assuming full implementation under the U.S. Basel III rules, for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.




Citigroup Basel III Supplementary Leverage Ratio and Related Components (Full Implementation)
In millions of dollars, except ratios
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
Tier 1 Capital
$
174,760

$
164,036

Total Leverage Exposure (TLE)
 
 
On-balance sheet assets(1)
$
1,830,215

$
1,784,248

Certain off-balance sheet exposures:(2)
 
 
   Potential future exposure (PFE) on derivative contracts
213,263

206,128

   Effective notional of sold credit derivatives, net(3)
68,440

76,923

   Counterparty credit risk for repo-style transactions(4)
21,372

25,939

   Unconditionally cancellable commitments
67,161

58,699

   Other off-balance sheet exposures
218,320

225,450

Total of certain off-balance sheet exposures
$
588,556

$
593,139

Less: Tier 1 Capital deductions
58,251

59,538

Total Leverage Exposure
$
2,360,520

$
2,317,849

Supplementary Leverage ratio
7.40
%
7.08
%

(1)
Represents the daily average of on-balance sheet assets for the quarter.
(2)
Represents the average of certain off-balance sheet exposures calculated as of the last day of each month in the quarter.
(3)
Under the U.S. Basel III rules, banking organizations are required to include in TLE the effective notional amount of sold credit derivatives, with netting of exposures permitted if certain conditions are met.
(4)
Repo-style transactions include repurchase or reverse repurchase transactions and securities borrowing or securities lending transactions.

Citibank’s Supplementary Leverage ratio, assuming full implementation under the U.S. Basel III rules, was 6.7% for the third quarter of 2016, compared to 6.8% for the second quarter of 2016 and 6.7% for the fourth quarter of 2015. The ratio decreased quarter-over-quarter, as quarterly net income of $3.1 billion was more than offset by an overall increase in Total Leverage Exposure, as well as cash dividends paid by Citibank to its parent, Citicorp, and which were subsequently remitted to Citigroup. The ratio remained unchanged from the fourth quarter of 2015, as the Tier 1 Capital benefits associated with net income and beneficial net movements in AOCI were offset by an increase in Total Leverage Exposure and cash dividends paid by Citibank to its parent, Citicorp, and which were subsequently remitted to Citigroup.


44



Regulatory Capital Standards Developments
For additional information regarding other recent regulatory capital standards developments, see “Capital Resources—Regulatory Capital Standards Developments” in Citigroup’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, First Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q and Second Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q.

Policy Statement on U.S. Countercyclical Capital Buffer
In September 2016, the Federal Reserve Board released a final policy statement which sets forth the framework to be followed in setting the amount of the U.S. Countercyclical
Capital Buffer applicable to Advanced Approaches banking organizations. Although substantially unchanged from the proposed policy statement released in December 2015, the final policy statement clarifies that the Countercyclical Capital Buffer would be increased above 0% when the Federal Reserve Board assesses that financial system vulnerabilities are above normal and are either already at, or expected to build to, levels sufficient to generate material unexpected losses in the event of an unfavorable development in financial markets or the economy. Moreover, the Federal Reserve Board expects to remove or reduce the Countercyclical Capital Buffer when the conditions that led to its activation abate or lessen, and when the release of capital would promote financial stability.
The Federal Reserve Board also stated that it would generally expect to provide notice to the public and seek comment on the proposed level of the Countercyclical Capital Buffer as part of making any final determination to change the Countercyclical Capital Buffer.
Separately, in October 2016, the Federal Reserve Board voted to affirm the Countercyclical Capital Buffer amount at the current level of 0%. In arriving at this determination, the Federal Reserve Board followed the framework detailed in the aforementioned policy statement.

Regulatory Treatment of Accounting for Expected Credit Losses
In October 2016, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee) issued a consultative document and a discussion paper related to the regulatory treatment of accounting for expected credit losses under the Basel III regulatory capital framework. Both the International Accounting Standards Board and more recently the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new accounting pronouncements related to impairment of financial assets that require the use of expected credit loss models rather than incurred loss models. Measuring impairment using expected credit loss models may result in higher accounting provisions for credit losses and consequently increased volatility in regulatory capital.
In the consultative document, the Basel Committee proposes to retain, for an interim period, the current regulatory treatment of accounting provisions for credit losses. The discussion paper considers various policy options for the long-term regulatory treatment of accounting provisions for credit losses.
 
The U.S. banking agencies may revise the regulatory treatment of accounting provisions for credit losses under the U.S. Basel III rules in the future, based on any revisions adopted by the Basel Committee.
Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) Holdings
In October 2016, the Basel Committee issued a final rule which amends the Basel III definition of regulatory capital to include a Tier 2 Capital deduction for investments by an internationally active bank (both GSIBs and non-GSIBs) in TLAC and certain other debt instruments issued by GSIBs that do not otherwise qualify as regulatory capital (i.e., TLAC holdings). Under the final rule, a Tier 2 Capital deduction is required under certain circumstances for investments in TLAC holdings which exceed certain thresholds, based on Common Equity Tier 1 Capital, as adjusted. Moreover, the final rule clarifies that any Common Equity Tier 1 Capital that is being used to meet the TLAC requirement cannot also be used to meet the regulatory capital buffers, including the GSIB surcharge.
The final rule becomes effective at the same time as the minimum TLAC requirements for each GSIB, that is January 1, 2019 for investments in most GSIBs, but may be later for certain others.
The Federal Reserve Board previously issued a proposed TLAC rule in November 2015 that includes an amendment to the U.S. Basel III definition of regulatory capital which would require a Tier 2 Capital deduction for investments in certain unsecured debt of GSIBs. In this regard, the Federal Reserve Board’s proposed TLAC rule is largely similar to the Basel Committee’s final rule on TLAC holdings.




45



Tangible Common Equity, Tangible Book Value Per Share and Book Value Per Share
Tangible common equity (TCE), as defined by Citi, represents common equity less goodwill and other intangible assets (other than MSRs). Other companies may calculate TCE in a different manner. TCE and tangible book value per share are non-GAAP financial measures.
 








In millions of dollars or shares, except per share amounts
September 30,
2016
December 31, 2015
Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity
$
231,575

$
221,857

Less: Preferred stock
19,253

16,718

Common equity
$
212,322

$
205,139

Less:
 
 
    Goodwill
22,539

22,349

    Intangible assets (other than MSRs)(1)
5,358

3,721

    Goodwill and intangible assets (other than MSRs) related to assets held-for-sale
30

68

Tangible common equity (TCE)
$
184,395

$
179,001

 
 
 
Common shares outstanding (CSO)
2,849.7

2,953.3

Tangible book value per share (TCE/CSO)
$
64.71

$
60.61

Book value per share (Common equity/CSO)
$
74.51

$
69.46


(1)
Identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs) increased by approximately $2.2 billion as a result of the acquisition of the Costco cards portfolio, as well as the renewal and extension of the co-branded credit card program agreement with American Airlines. For additional information, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


46



Managing Global Risk Table of Contents

MANAGING GLOBAL RISK
 

CREDIT RISK(1)
 

  Consumer Credit
 

  GCB Commercial Banking Exposure to the Energy and Energy-Related Sector
 

  Corporate Credit
 

  Additional Consumer and Corporate Credit Details
 

 Loans Outstanding
 

       Details of Credit Loss Experience
 

       Allowance for Loan Losses
 
61

       Non-Accrual Loans and Assets and Renegotiated Loans
 

LIQUIDITY RISK
 

       High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA)
 

       Loans
 
68

       Deposits
 
68

       Long-Term Debt
 
69

       Secured Funding Transactions and Short-Term Borrowings
 
71

       Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
 
72

       Credit Ratings
 
73

MARKET RISK(1)
 

  Market Risk of Non-Trading Portfolios
 

  Market Risk of Trading Portfolios
 

COUNTRY RISK
 


(1)
For additional information regarding certain credit risk, market risk and other quantitative and qualitative information, refer to Citi’s Pillar 3 Basel III Advanced Approaches Disclosures, as required by the rules of the Federal Reserve Board, on Citi’s Investor Relations website.


47



MANAGING GLOBAL RISK

For Citi, effective risk management is of primary importance to its overall operations. Accordingly, Citi’s risk management process has been designed to monitor, evaluate and manage the principal risks it assumes in conducting its activities. Specifically, the activities that Citi engages in, and the risks those activities generate, must be consistent with Citi’s mission and value proposition, the key principles that guide it, and Citi's risk appetite.
For more information on Citi’s management of global risk, including its three lines of defense, see “Managing Global Risk” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 





48



CREDIT RISK

For additional information on credit risk, including Citi’s credit risk management, measurement and stress testing, see “Credit Risk” and “Risk Factors” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

CONSUMER CREDIT

North America Consumer Mortgage Lending

Overview
Citi’s North America consumer mortgage portfolio consists of both residential first mortgages and home equity loans. At September 30, 2016, Citi’s North America consumer mortgage portfolio was $74.7 billion (compared to $76.9 billion at June 30, 2016), of which the residential first mortgage portfolio was $54.7 billion (compared to $55.8 billion at June 30, 2016), and the home equity loan portfolio was $20.0 billion (compared to $21.1 billion at June 30, 2016). For additional information on Citi’s North America consumer mortgage portfolio, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and “Credit Risk—North America Consumer Mortgage Lending” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

North America Consumer Mortgage—Residential First Mortgages
The following charts detail the quarterly outstanding loans and credit trends for Citi’s residential first mortgage portfolio in North America.
North America Residential First Mortgage - EOP Loans
In billions of dollars
narfmeop2016q3.jpg
 
North America Residential First Mortgage - Net Credit Losses
In millions of dollars
narfmnclq32016.jpg

Note: CMI refers to loans originated by CitiMortgage. CFNA refers to loans originated by CitiFinancial. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
(1)
Decrease in 4Q’15 EOP loans primarily reflected the transfer of CFNA residential first mortgages to held-for-sale and classification as Other assets at year-end 2015. This transfer did not impact net credit losses in 4Q’15.
(2)
Decrease in 1Q’16 net credit losses primarily reflected the transfer of CFNA residential first mortgage to held-for-sale and classification as Other assets at year-end 2015.
(3)
2Q’16 excludes a $23 million recovery of prior net credit losses related to the sale of CMI residential first mortgages during the quarter.
(4)
Year-over-year change in the S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index.
(5)
Year-over-year change as of July 2016.

North America Residential First Mortgage Delinquencies-Citi Holdings
In billions of dollars
narfmdch2016q3.jpg

Note: Days past due excludes (i) U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored agencies because the potential loss predominantly resides with the U.S. agencies, and (ii) loans recorded at fair value. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
(1)
Decrease in 4Q’15 delinquencies primarily reflected the transfer of CFNA residential first mortgages to held-for-sale and classification as Other assets at year-end 2015.

Overall changes in net credit losses and delinquencies in Citi’s North America residential first mortgage portfolio during the current quarter were driven by, and will continue to be driven by, continued asset sales or transfers to held-for-sale as well as overall trends in HPI and interest rates.



49



North America Residential First Mortgages—State Delinquency Trends
The following tables set forth the six U.S. states and/or regions with the highest concentration of Citi’s residential first mortgages.

In billions of dollars
September 30, 2016
June 30, 2016
State(1)
ENR(2)
ENR
Distribution
90+DPD
%
%
LTV >
100%(3)
Refreshed
FICO
ENR(2)
ENR
Distribution
90+DPD
%
%
LTV >
100%(3)
Refreshed
FICO
CA
$
19.5

39
%
%
%
758

$
19.6

38
%
0.2
%
%
756

NY/NJ/CT(4)
13.2

26

0.6

1

753

13.2

26

0.7

1

753

IL(4)
2.3

4

0.9

1

738

2.3

4

0.9

3

737

FL(4)

2.2

4

0.7

1

728

2.2

4

0.7

2

727

VA/MD

2.1

4

1.1

1

722

2.2

4

1.0

3

722

TX
1.7

3

0.8


716

1.8

3

0.9


716

Other
9.5

19

1.2

1

715

10.0

20

1.2

2

714

Total
$
50.6

100
%
0.6
%
1
%
743

$
51.3

100
%
0.6
%
1
%
742


Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
(1)
Certain of the states are included as part of a region based on Citi’s view of similar HPI within the region.
(2)
Ending net receivables. Excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico, loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to long term standby commitments (LTSCs). Excludes balances for which FICO or LTV data are unavailable.
(3)
LTV ratios (loan balance divided by appraised value) are calculated at origination and updated by applying market price data.
(4)
New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida and Illinois are judicial states.
 
Foreclosures
A substantial majority of Citi’s foreclosure inventory consists of residential first mortgages. At September 30, 2016, Citi’s foreclosure inventory was approximately $0.1 billion, or 0.2%, of the total residential first mortgage portfolio, unchanged from June 30, 2016, based on the dollar amount of ending net receivables of loans in foreclosure inventory, excluding loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government agencies and loans subject to LTSCs.

North America Consumer Mortgage—Home Equity Loans
Citi’s home equity loan portfolio consists of both fixed-rate home equity loans and loans extended under home equity lines of credit. Fixed-rate home equity loans are fully amortizing. Home equity lines of credit allow for amounts to be drawn for a period of time with the payment of interest only and then, at the end of the draw period, the then-outstanding amount is converted to an amortizing loan (the interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for this product across the industry). After conversion, the home equity loans typically have a 20-year amortization period. As of September 30, 2016, Citi’s home equity loan portfolio of $20.0 billion consisted of $5.5 billion of fixed-rate home equity loans and $14.5 billion of loans extended under home equity lines of credit (Revolving HELOCs).

 

Revolving HELOCs
Citi’s $14.5 billion of Revolving HELOCs as of September 30, 2016 consisted of $5.6 billion of loans that had commenced amortization (compared to $5.2 billion at June 30, 2016) and $8.9 billion of loans still within their revolving period that had not commenced amortization, or “reset” (compared to $10.0 billion at June 30, 2016). The following chart indicates the FICO and combined loan-to-value (CLTV) characteristics of Citi’s Revolving HELOCs portfolio and the year in which they reset:
North America Home Equity Lines of Credit Amortization – Citigroup
Total ENR by Reset Year
In billions of dollars as of September 30, 2016
naheloca3q16.jpg
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.

Approximately 39% of Citi’s total Revolving HELOCs portfolio had commenced amortization as of September 30, 2016 (compared to 34% as of June 30, 2016). Of the remaining Revolving HELOCs portfolio, approximately 50% will commence amortization during the remainder of 2016–2017. Before commencing amortization, Revolving HELOC borrowers are required to pay only interest on their loans. Upon amortization, these borrowers will be required to pay both interest, usually at a variable rate, and principal that


50



amortizes typically over 20 years, rather than the typical 30-year amortization. As a result, Citi’s customers with Revolving HELOCs that reset could experience “payment shock” due to the higher required payments on the loans.
While it is not certain what ultimate impact this payment shock could have on Citi’s delinquency rates and net credit losses, Citi currently estimates that the monthly loan payment for its Revolving HELOCs that reset during the remainder of 2016–2017 could increase on average by approximately $370, or 155%. Increases in interest rates could further increase these payments given the variable nature of the interest rates on these loans post-reset. Of the Revolving HELOCs that will commence amortization during the remainder of 2016–2017, approximately $0.3 billion, or 5%, of the loans have a CLTV greater than 100% as of September 30, 2016. Borrowers’ high loan-to-value positions, as well as the cost and availability of refinancing options, could limit borrowers’ ability to refinance their Revolving HELOCs as these loans begin to reset.
Approximately 6.5% of the Revolving HELOCs that have begun amortization as of September 30, 2016 were 30+ days past due, compared to 3.7% of the total outstanding home equity loan portfolio (amortizing and non-amortizing). This compared to 6.5% and 3.5%, respectively, as of June 30, 2016. As newly amortizing loans continue to season, the delinquency rate of the amortizing Revolving HELOC portfolio and total home equity loan portfolio is expected to increase. Delinquencies on newly amortizing loans have tended to peak between four and six months after reset. Resets to date have generally occurred during a period of historically low interest rates, improving HPI and a favorable economic environment, which Citi believes has likely reduced the overall “payment shock” to the borrower.
Citi continues to monitor this reset risk closely and will continue to consider any potential impact in determining its allowance for loan loss reserves. In addition, management continues to review and take additional actions to offset potential reset risk, such as a borrower outreach program to provide reset risk education and proactively working with high-risk borrowers through a specialized single point of contact unit. For further information on reset risk, see “Risk Factors—Credit and Market Risks” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Net Credit Losses and Delinquencies
The following charts detail the quarterly outstanding loans and credit trends for Citi’s home equity loan portfolio in North America:
North America Home Equity - EOP Loans
In billions of dollars
naheeopl3q16.jpg

North America Home Equity - Net Credit Losses
In millions of dollars
nahenclq3.jpg

Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
(1)
2Q’16 excludes a non-recurring benefit to net credit losses of approximately $13 million associated with certain previously charged-off loans.


North America Home Equity Loan Delinquencies - Citi Holdings
In billions of dollars
naheldch.jpg
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.

Given the limited market in which to sell delinquent home equity loans to date, as well as the relatively smaller number of home equity loan modifications and modification programs (see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), Citi’s ability to reduce delinquencies or net credit losses in its home equity loan portfolio in Citi Holdings, whether pursuant to deterioration of the underlying credit performance of these loans, the reset of the Revolving HELOCs (as discussed above) or otherwise, is more limited as compared to residential first mortgages.


51



North America Home Equity Loans—State Delinquency Trends
The following tables set forth the six U.S. states and/or regions with the highest concentration of Citi’s home equity loans:
In billions of dollars
September 30, 2016
June 30, 2016
State(1)
ENR(2)
ENR
Distribution
90+DPD
%
%
CLTV >
100%(3)
Refreshed
FICO
ENR(2)
ENR
Distribution
90+DPD
%
%
CLTV >
100%(3)
Refreshed
FICO
CA
$
5.4

29
%
2.1
%
4
%
732

$
5.7

29
%
1.9
%
4
%
731

NY/NJ/CT(4)
5.4

29

2.8

6

727

5.6

28

2.7

9

726

FL(4)
1.2

7

2.5

14

716

1.4

7

2.1

16

715

VA/MD
1.1

6

2.1

17

715

1.2

6

2.1

24

714

IL(4)
0.9

4

1.7

19

724

0.9

4

1.7

30

722

IN/OH/MI(4)
0.5

2

1.6

13

704

0.5

3

1.7

25

704

Other
4.2

23

2.0

7

713

4.5

23

1.9

10

712

Total
$
18.8

100
%
2.3
%
8
%
723

$
19.8

100
%
2.1
%
11
%
722


Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
(1)
Certain of the states are included as part of a region based on Citi’s view of similar HPI within the region.
(2)
Ending net receivables. Excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico and loans subject to LTSCs. Excludes balances for which FICO or LTV data are unavailable.
(3)
Represents combined loan-to-value (CLTV) for both residential first mortgages and home equity loans. CLTV ratios (loan balance divided by appraised value) are calculated at origination and updated by applying market price data.
(4)
New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Indiana, Ohio, Florida and Illinois are judicial states.    


GCB Commercial Banking Exposure to the Energy and Energy-Related Sector
In addition to the total corporate credit exposure to the energy and energy-related sector described under “Corporate Credit” below, Citi’s commercial banking business, reported within GCB retail banking, had total credit exposure to the energy and energy-related sector of approximately $2.0 billion as of September 30, 2016, with approximately $1.4 billion of direct outstanding funded loans, or 4%, of the total outstanding commercial banking loans. This was unchanged from June 30, 2016. In addition, as of September 30, 2016, approximately 89% of commercial banking’s total credit exposure to the energy and energy-related sector was in the U.S., relatively unchanged from June 30, 2016. Approximately 39% of commercial banking’s total energy and energy-related exposure was rated investment grade at September 30, 2016, compared to approximately 29% as of June 30, 2016. During the third quarter of 2016, Citi released additional energy and energy-related loan loss reserves by approximately $32 million, and incurred net credit losses of approximately $19 million on this commercial banking portfolio. As of September 30, 2016, Citi held loan loss reserves against its funded energy and energy-related commercial banking loans equal to approximately 8.7% of these loans (compared to approximately 9.8% as of June 30, 2016).




52



Additional Consumer Credit Details

Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts and Ratios
 
EOP
loans(1)
90+ days past due(2)
30–89 days past due(2)
In millions of dollars,
except EOP loan amounts in billions
September 30,
2016
September 30,
2016
June 30,
2016
September 30,
2015
September 30,
2016
June 30,
2016
September 30,
2015
Citicorp(3)(4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
$
289.7

$
2,169

$
1,965

$
1,981

$
2,552

$
2,318

$
2,427

Ratio
 
0.75
%
0.69
%
0.74
%
0.88
%
0.82
%
0.90
%
Retail banking
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
$
141.9

$
579

$
515

$
529

$
722

$
735

$
764

Ratio
 
0.41
%
0.37
%
0.38
%
0.51
%
0.52
%
0.55
%
North America
54.8

256

180

138

198

192

198

Ratio
 
0.47
%
0.33
%
0.28
%
0.37
%
0.36
%
0.40
%
Latin America
19.0

160

157

212

196

197

239

Ratio
 
0.84
%
0.81
%
1.07
%
1.03
%
1.01
%
1.21
%
Asia(5)
68.1

163

178

179

328

346

327

Ratio
 
0.24
%
0.26
%
0.26
%
0.48
%
0.51
%
0.48
%
Cards
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
$
147.8

$
1,590

$
1,450

$
1,452

$
1,830

$
1,583

$
1,663

Ratio
 
1.08
%
1.01
%
1.11
%
1.24
%
1.10
%
1.28
%
North America—Citi-branded
81.3

607

510

491

710

550

504

Ratio
 
0.75
%
0.66
%
0.76
%
0.87
%
0.71
%
0.78
%
North America—Citi retail services
43.9

664

619

621

750

669

758

Ratio
 
1.51
%
1.43
%
1.44
%
1.71
%
1.55
%
1.76
%
Latin America
4.9

131

145

169

131

137

181

Ratio
 
2.67
%
2.90
%
3.13
%
2.67
%
2.74
%
3.35
%
Asia(5)
17.7

188

176

171

239

227

220

Ratio
 
1.06
%
1.00
%
1.01
%
1.35
%
1.29
%
1.29
%
Citi Holdings(6)(7)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
$
38.9

$
857

$
878

$
1,528

$
849

$
858

$
1,423

Ratio
 
2.29
%
2.23
%
2.69
%
2.27
%
2.18
%
2.51
%
International
5.5

164

170

174

135

138

193

Ratio
 
2.98
%
3.09
%
2.00
%
2.45
%
2.51
%
2.22
%
North America
33.4

693

708

1,354

714

720

1,230

Ratio
 
2.17
%
2.09
%
2.81
%
2.24
%
2.12
%
2.56
%
Other (8)
0.1

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Citigroup
$
328.7

$
3,026

$
2,843

$
3,509

$
3,401

$
3,176

$
3,850

Ratio
 
0.93
%
0.88
%
1.08
%
1.04
%
0.98
%
1.18
%
(1)
End-of-period (EOP) loans include interest and fees on credit cards.
(2)
The ratios of 90+ days past due and 30–89 days past due are calculated based on EOP loans, net of unearned income.
(3)
The 90+ days past due balances for North America—Citi-branded and North America—Citi retail services are generally still accruing interest. Citigroup’s policy is generally to accrue interest on credit card loans until 180 days past due, unless notification of bankruptcy filing has been received earlier.
(4)
The 90+ days and 30–89 days past due and related ratios for Citicorp North America exclude U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities since the potential loss predominantly resides within the U.S. government-sponsored entities. The amounts excluded for loans 90+ days past due and (EOP loans) were $305 million ($0.7 billion), $408 million ($0.9 billion) and $498 million ($0.9 billion) at September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016, and September 30, 2015, respectively. The amounts excluded for loans 30–89 days past due (EOP loans have the same adjustment as above) were $58 million, $91 million and $79 million at September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016, and September 30, 2015, respectively.
(5)
Asia includes delinquencies and loans in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.
(6)
The 90+ days and 30–89 days past due and related ratios for Citi Holdings North America exclude U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities since the potential loss predominantly resides within the U.S. government-sponsored entities. The amounts excluded for loans 90+ days past

53



due (and EOP loans) were $1.0 billion ($1.5 billion), $1.2 billion ($1.8 billion) and $1.7 billion ($2.6 billion) at September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016, and September 30, 2015, respectively. The amounts excluded for loans 30–89 days past due (EOP loans have the same adjustment as above) for each period were $0.1 billion, $0.2 billion and $0.3 billion at September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016, and September 30, 2015, respectively.
(7)
The September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016, and September 30, 2015 loans 90+ days past due and 30–89 days past due and related ratios for North America exclude $9 million, $9 million and $12 million, respectively, of loans that are carried at fair value.
(8)
Represents loans classified as Consumer loans on the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are not included in the Citi Holdings consumer credit metrics.

Consumer Loan Net Credit Losses and Ratios
 
Average
loans(1)
Net credit losses(2)(3)
In millions of dollars, except average loan amounts in billions
3Q16
3Q16
2Q16
3Q15
Citicorp
 
 
 
 
Total
$
287.8

$
1,351

$
1,373

$
1,354

Ratio
 
1.87
%
2.02
%
1.99
%
Retail banking
 
 
 
 
Total
$
142.3

$
259

$
242

$
247

Ratio
 
0.72
%
0.69
%
0.70
%
North America
55.0

54

44

34

Ratio
 
0.39
%
0.33
%
0.27
%
Latin America
19.4

132

137

138

Ratio
 
2.71
%
2.83
%
2.72
%
Asia(4)
67.9

73

61

75

Ratio
 
0.43
%
0.36
%
0.43
%
Cards
 
 
 
 
Total
$
145.5

$
1,092

$
1,131

$
1,107

Ratio
 
2.99
%
3.45
%
3.39
%
North America—Citi-branded
79.2

448

467

443

Ratio
 
2.25
%
2.82
%
2.75
%
North America—Retail services
43.6

427

442

401

Ratio
 
3.90
%
4.16
%
3.69
%
Latin America
5.1

122

123

163

Ratio
 
9.52
%
9.70
%
11.55
%
Asia(4)
17.6

95

99

100

Ratio
 
2.15
%
2.29
%
2.32
%
Citi Holdings(3)
 
 
 
 
Total
$
40.8

$
134

$
101

$
259

Ratio
 
1.31
%
0.94
%
1.67
%
International
5.4

82

77

93

Ratio
 
6.04
%
5.08
%
4.19
%
North America
35.4

52

24

166

Ratio
 
0.58
%
0.26
%
1.25
%
Total Citigroup
$
328.6

$
1,485

$
1,474

$
1,613

Ratio
 
1.80
%
1.87
%
1.93
%
(1)
Average loans include interest and fees on credit cards.
(2)
The ratios of net credit losses are calculated based on average loans, net of unearned income.
(3)
As a result of the entry into an agreement to sell OneMain Financial (OneMain), OneMain was classified as held-for-sale (HFS) beginning March 31, 2015. As a result of HFS accounting treatment, approximately $116 million of net credit losses (NCLs) were recorded as a reduction in revenue (Other revenue) during the third quarter of 2015. Accordingly, these NCLs are not included in this table. Loans HFS are excluded from this table as they are recorded in Other assets.
(4)
Asia includes NCLs and average loans in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.




54



CORPORATE CREDIT
Consistent with its overall strategy, Citi’s corporate clients are typically large, multi-national corporations which value Citi’s global network. Citi aims to establish relationships with these clients that encompass multiple products, consistent with client needs, including cash management and trade services, foreign exchange, lending, capital markets and M&A advisory.

Corporate Credit Portfolio
The following table sets forth Citi’s corporate credit portfolio within ICG (excluding private bank), before consideration of collateral or hedges, by remaining tenor for the periods indicated:

 
At September 30, 2016
At June 30, 2016
At December 31, 2015
In billions of dollars
Due
within
1 year
Greater
than 1 year
but within
5 years
Greater
than
5 years
Total
exposure
Due
within
1 year
Greater
than 1 year
but within
5 years
Greater
than
5 years
Total
exposure
Due
within
1 year
Greater
than 1 year
but within
5 years
Greater
than
5 years
Total
exposure
Direct outstandings (on-balance sheet)(1)
$
109

$
102

$
24

$
235

$
111

$
99

$
24

$
234

$
98

$
97

$
25

$
220

Unfunded lending commitments (off-balance sheet)(2)
102

209

27

338

101

209

32

342

99

231

26

356

Total exposure
$
211

$
311

$
51

$
573

$
212

$
308

$
56

$
576

$
197

$
328

$
51

$
576


(1)
Includes drawn loans, overdrafts, bankers’ acceptances and leases.
(2)
Includes unused commitments to lend, letters of credit and financial guarantees.

Portfolio Mix—Geography, Counterparty and Industry
Citi’s corporate credit portfolio is diverse across geography and counterparty. The following table shows the percentage by region based on Citi’s internal management geography:
 
September 30,
2016
June 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
North America
54
%
54
%
56
%
EMEA
26

26

25

Asia
12

12

12

Latin America
8

8

7

Total
100
%
100
%
100
%

The maintenance of accurate and consistent risk ratings across the corporate credit portfolio facilitates the comparison of credit exposure across all lines of business, geographic regions and products. Counterparty risk ratings reflect an estimated probability of default for a counterparty and are derived primarily through the use of validated statistical models, scorecard models and external agency ratings (under defined circumstances), in combination with consideration of factors specific to the obligor or market, such as management experience, competitive position, regulatory environment and commodity prices. Facility risk ratings are assigned that reflect the probability of default of



 

the obligor and factors that affect the loss-given-default of the facility, such as support or collateral. Internal obligor ratings that generally correspond to BBB and above are
considered investment grade, while those below are considered non-investment grade.
Citigroup also has incorporated climate risk assessment and reporting criteria for certain obligors, as necessary. Factors evaluated include consideration of climate risk to an
obligor’s business and physical assets and, when relevant, consideration of cost-effective options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The following table presents the corporate credit portfolio by facility risk rating as a percentage of the total corporate credit portfolio:
 
Total Exposure
 
September 30,
2016
June 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
AAA/AA/A
49
%
49
%
48
%
BBB
34

34

35

BB/B
15

15

15

CCC or below
2

2

2

Unrated



Total
100
%
100
%
100
%

Note: Total exposure includes direct outstandings and unfunded lending commitments.


55



Citi’s corporate credit portfolio is also diversified by industry. The following table shows the allocation of Citi’s total corporate credit portfolio by industry:
 
Total Exposure
 
September 30,
2016
June 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
Transportation and industrial
21
%
21
%
20
%
Consumer retail and health
16

17

16

Power, chemicals, commodities and metals and mining
11

11

11

Technology, media and telecom
11

11

12

Energy (1)
8

9

9

Real estate
7

6

6

Banks/broker-dealers
6

7

7

Public sector
5

5

5

Insurance and special purpose entities
5

5

5

Hedge funds
5

5

5

Other industries
5

3

4

Total
100
%
100
%
100
%

Note: Total exposure includes direct outstandings and unfunded lending commitments.
(1) In addition to this exposure, Citi has energy-related exposure within the “Public sector” (e.g., energy-related state-owned entities) and “Transportation and industrial” sector (e.g., off-shore drilling entities) included in the table above. As of September 30, 2016, Citi’s total exposure to these energy-related entities remained largely consistent with the prior quarter, at approximately $7 billion, of which approximately $4 billion consisted of direct outstanding funded loans.

Exposure to the Energy and Energy-Related Sector
As of September 30, 2016, Citi’s total corporate credit exposure to the energy and energy-related sector (see footnote 1 to the table above) was $55.0 billion, with $20.6 billion consisting of direct outstanding funded loans, or 3%, of Citi’s total outstanding loans. This compared to $56.9 billion of total exposure and $22.1 billion of funded loans as of June 30, 2016. In addition, as of September 30, 2016, approximately 72% of ICG’s total corporate credit energy and energy-related exposure was in the United States, United Kingdom and Canada (unchanged from June 30, 2016). Also as of September 30, 2016, approximately 74% of Citi’s total energy and energy-related exposures were rated investment grade (compared to approximately 73% at June 30, 2016).
During the third quarter of 2016, Citi released approximately $35 million of energy and energy-related loan loss reserves and recognized a $1 million recovery in the energy and energy-related loan portfolio. As of September 30, 2016, Citi held loan loss reserves against its funded energy and energy-related loans equal to approximately 4.0% of these loans (up slightly from 3.9% at June 30, 2016), with a funded reserve ratio of approximately
 
10.6% on the non-investment grade portion of the portfolio (up slightly from 10.2% as of June 30, 2016).
For information on Citi’s energy and energy-related exposures within GCB’s commercial banking business within retail banking, see “Commercial Credit—GCB Commercial Banking Exposure to the Energy and Energy-Related Sector” above.

Exposure to Banks, Broker-Dealers and Finance Companies
As of September 30, 2016, Citi’s total corporate credit exposure to banks, broker-dealers and finance companies was approximately $36 billion, of which $25 billion represented direct outstanding funded loans, or 4% of Citi’s total outstanding loans. Also as of September 30, 2016, approximately 80% of Citi’s bank, broker-dealers and finance companies total corporate credit exposure was rated investment grade. Included in the amounts noted above, as of September 30, 2016, Citi’s total corporate credit exposure to banks was approximately $22 billion, with approximately $17 billion consisting of direct outstanding funded loans, or 3% of Citi’s total outstanding loans. Of the approximately $22 billion as of September 30, 2016, approximately 31% related to Asia, 31% related to EMEA, 16% related to North America and 22% related to Latin America. Approximately two-thirds of Citi’s total corporate credit exposure to banks had a tenor of less than 12 months as of September 30, 2016.
In addition to the corporate lending exposures described
above, Citi has additional exposure to banks, broker-dealers
and finance companies in the form of derivatives and
securities financing transactions, which are typically
executed as repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements or
securities loaned or borrowed arrangements. As of September 30, 2016, Citi had net derivative credit exposure to banks, broker-dealers and finance companies of approximately $9 billion after the application of netting arrangements, legally enforceable margin agreements and other collateral arrangements. The collateral considered as part of the net derivative credit exposure was represented primarily by high quality, liquid assets. As of September 30, 2016, Citi had net credit exposure to banks, broker-dealers and finance companies in the form of securities financing transactions of $5 billion after the application of netting and collateral arrangements. The collateral considered in the net exposure for the securities financing transactions exposure was primarily cash and highly liquid investment grade securities.





56



Credit Risk Mitigation
As part of its overall risk management activities, Citigroup uses credit derivatives and other risk mitigants to hedge portions of the credit risk in its corporate credit portfolio, in addition to outright asset sales. The results of the mark-to-market and any realized gains or losses on credit derivatives are reflected primarily in Other revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
At September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, $37.8 billion, $37.6 billion and $34.5 billion, respectively, of the corporate credit portfolio was economically hedged. Citigroup’s expected loss model used in the calculation of its loan loss reserve does not include the favorable impact of credit derivatives and other mitigants that are marked to market. In addition, the reported amounts of direct outstandings and unfunded lending commitments in the tables above do not reflect the impact of these hedging transactions. The credit protection was economically hedging underlying corporate credit portfolio exposures with the following risk rating distribution:

Rating of Hedged Exposure
 
September 30,
2016
June 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
AAA/AA/A
20
%
20
%
21
%
BBB
53

51

48

BB/B
24

25

27

CCC or below
3

4

4

Total
100
%
100
%
100
%
 
The credit protection was economically hedging underlying corporate credit portfolio exposures with the following industry distribution:

Industry of Hedged Exposure
 
September 30,
2016
June 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
Transportation and industrial
28
%
26
%
28
%
Consumer retail and health
16

16

17

Energy
16

15

13

Technology, media and telecom
14

15

16

Power, chemicals, commodities and metals and mining

12

12

12

Public Sector
4

5

4

Insurance and special purpose entities
3

5

5

Banks/broker-dealers
3

5

4

Other industries
4

1

1

Total
100
%
100
%
100
%




57



ADDITIONAL CONSUMER AND CORPORATE CREDIT DETAILS

Loans Outstanding
 
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
1st Qtr.
4th Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
In millions of dollars
2016
2016
2016
2015
2015
Consumer loans





In U.S. offices





Mortgage and real estate(1)
$
75,057

$
77,242

$
79,128

$
80,281

$
89,155

Installment, revolving credit, and other
3,465

3,486

3,504

3,480

4,999

Cards
124,637

120,113

106,892

112,800

107,244

Commercial and industrial
6,989

7,041

6,793

6,407

6,437


$
210,148

$
207,882

$
196,317

$
202,968

$
207,835

In offices outside the U.S.
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage and real estate(1)
$
45,751

$
46,049

$
47,831

$
47,062

$
47,295

Installment, revolving credit, and other
28,217

27,830

28,778

29,480

29,702

Cards
25,833

25,844

26,312

27,342

26,865

Commercial and industrial
17,828

17,857

17,697

17,741

17,841

Lease financing
113

140

139

362

368


$
117,742

$
117,720

$
120,757

$
121,987

$
122,071

Total consumer loans
$
327,890

$
325,602

$
317,074

$
324,955

$
329,906

Unearned income(2)
812

817

826

830

(687
)
Consumer loans, net of unearned income
$
328,702

$
326,419

$
317,900

$
325,785

$
329,219

Corporate loans





In U.S. offices





Commercial and industrial
$
50,156

$
50,286

$
44,104

$
41,147

$
40,435

Loans to financial institutions
35,801

32,001

36,865

36,396

38,034

Mortgage and real estate(1)
41,078

40,175

38,697

37,565

37,019

Installment, revolving credit, and other
32,571

32,491

33,273

33,374

32,129

Lease financing
1,532

1,546

1,597

1,780

1,718


$
161,138

$
156,499

$
154,536

$
150,262

$
149,335

In offices outside the U.S.





Commercial and industrial
$
84,162

$
87,125

$
85,491

$
82,358

$
85,628

Loans to financial institutions
27,305

27,856

28,652

28,704

28,090

Mortgage and real estate(1)
5,595

5,455

5,769

5,106

6,602

Installment, revolving credit, and other
25,462

24,825

21,583

20,853

19,352

Lease financing
243

255

280

303

329

Governments and official institutions
6,506

5,757

5,303

4,911

4,503


$
149,273

$
151,273

$
147,078

$
142,235

$
144,504

Total corporate loans
$
310,411

$
307,772

$
301,614

$
292,497

$
293,839

Unearned income(3)
(678
)
(676
)
(690
)
(665
)
(614
)
Corporate loans, net of unearned income
$
309,733

$
307,096

$
300,924

$
291,832

$
293,225

Total loans—net of unearned income
$
638,435

$
633,515

$
618,824

$
617,617

$
622,444

Allowance for loan losses—on drawn exposures
(12,439
)
(12,304
)
(12,712
)
(12,626
)
(13,626
)
Total loans—net of unearned income 
and allowance for credit losses
$
625,996

$
621,211

$
606,112

$
604,991

$
608,818

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans—
net of unearned income
(4)
1.97
%
1.96
%
2.07
%
2.06
%
2.21
%
Allowance for consumer loan losses as a percentage of
total consumer loans—net of unearned income
(4)
2.94
%
2.89
%
3.09
%
3.02
%
3.35
%
Allowance for corporate loan losses as a percentage of
total corporate loans—net of unearned income
(4)
0.91
%
0.95
%
0.98
%
0.97
%
0.90
%
(1)
Loans secured primarily by real estate.
(2)
Unearned income on consumer loans primarily represents unamortized origination fees, costs, premiums and discounts. Prior to December 31, 2015, these items were more than offset by prepaid interest on loans outstanding issued by OneMain Financial. The sale of OneMain Financial was completed on November 16, 2015.
(3)
Unearned income on corporate loans primarily represents interest received in advance but not yet earned on loans originated on a discount basis.
(4)
All periods exclude loans that are carried at fair value.

58



Details of Credit Loss Experience
 
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
1st Qtr.
4th Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
In millions of dollars
2016
2016
2015
2015
2015
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period
$
12,304

$
12,712

$
12,626

$
13,626

$
14,075

Provision for loan losses
 
 
 
 
 
Consumer
$
1,817

$
1,275

$
1,570

$
1,684

$
1,338

Corporate
(71
)
115

316

572

244

 
$
1,746

$
1,390

$
1,886

$
2,256

$
1,582

Gross credit losses
 
 
 
 
 
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
1,183

$
1,212

$
1,230

$
1,267

$
1,244

In offices outside the U.S. 
702

678

689

794

746

Corporate
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
27

63

190

75

30

In offices outside the U.S. 
36

95

34

44

48

 
$
1,948

$
2,048

$
2,143

$
2,180

$
2,068

Credit recoveries(1)
 
 
 
 
 
Consumer
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
227

$
262

$
256

$
229

$
222

In offices outside the U.S. 
173

154

150

164

155

Corporate
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
16

3

4

9

11

In offices outside the U.S. 
7

13

9

16

17

 
$
423

$
432

$
419

$
418

$
405

Net credit losses
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
967

$
1,010

$
1,160

$
1,104

$
1,041

In offices outside the U.S. 
558

606

564

658

622

Total
$
1,525

$
1,616

$
1,724

$
1,762

$
1,663

Other—net(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
$
(86
)
$
(182
)
$
(76
)
$
(1,494
)
$
(368
)
Allowance for loan losses at end of period
$
12,439

$
12,304

$
12,712

$
12,626

$
13,626

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans(9)
1.97
%
1.96
%
2.07
%
2.06
%
2.21
%
Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(7)(10)
$
1,388

$
1,432

$
1,473

$
1,402

$
1,036

Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments
$
13,827

$
13,736

$
14,185

$
14,028

$
14,662

Net consumer credit losses
$
1,485

$
1,474

$
1,513

$
1,668

$
1,613

As a percentage of average consumer loans
1.80
%
1.87
%
1.90
%
2.00
%
1.93
%
Net corporate credit losses
$
40

$
142

$
211

$
94

$
50

As a percentage of average corporate loans
0.05
%
0.19
%
0.29
%
0.13
%
0.07
%
Allowance for loan losses at end of period(11)
 
 
 
 
 
Citicorp
$
10,735

$
10,433

$
10,544

$
10,331

$
10,213

Citi Holdings
1,704

1,871

2,168

2,295

3,413

Total Citigroup
$
12,439

$
12,304

$
12,712

$
12,626

$
13,626

Allowance by type
 
 
 
 
 
Consumer
$
9,673

$
9,432

$
9,807

$
9,835

$
11,030

Corporate
2,766

2,872

2,905

2,791

2,596

Total Citigroup
$
12,439

$
12,304

$
12,712

$
12,626

$
13,626

(1)
Recoveries have been reduced by certain collection costs that are incurred only if collection efforts are successful.
(2)
Includes all adjustments to the allowance for credit losses, such as changes in the allowance from acquisitions, dispositions, securitizations, FX translation, purchase accounting adjustments, etc.
(3)
The third quarter of 2016 includes a reduction of approximately $58 million related to the sale or transfers to held-for-sale (HFS) of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $50 million related to the transfers of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the third quarter includes a reduction of approximately $46 million related to FX translation.

59



(4)
The second quarter of 2016 includes a reduction of approximately $101 million related to the sale or transfers to HFS of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $24 million related to the transfers of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the second quarter includes a reduction of approximately $75 million related to FX translation.
(5)
The first quarter of 2016 includes a reduction of approximately $148 million related to the sale or transfers to HFS of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $29 million related to the transfers of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the first quarter includes an increase of approximately $63 million related to FX translation.
(6)
The fourth quarter of 2015 includes a reduction of approximately $1.1 billion related to the sale or transfers to HFS of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $1.1 billion related to the transfers of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the fourth quarter includes a reduction of approximately $35 million related to FX translation.
(7)
The fourth quarter of 2015 includes a reclassification of $271 million of Allowance for loan losses to allowance for unfunded lending commitments, included in the Other line item. This reclassification reflects the re-attribution of $271 million in allowance for credit losses between the funded and unfunded portions of the corporate credit portfolios and does not reflect a change in the underlying credit performance of these portfolios.
(8)
The third quarter of 2015 includes a reduction of approximately $110 million related to the sale or transfers to HFS of various loan portfolios, including a reduction of $14 million related to a transfer of a real estate loan portfolio to HFS. Additionally, the third quarter includes a reduction of approximately $255 million related to FX translation.
(9)
September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016, March 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, and September 30, 2015 exclude $4.0 billion, $4.1 billion, $4.8 billion, $5.0 billion and $5.5 billion, respectively, of loans which are carried at fair value.
(10)
Represents additional credit reserves recorded as Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(11)
Allowance for loan losses represents management’s best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio, as well as probable losses related to large individually evaluated impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings. See “Significant Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates” and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes only and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the overall portfolio.

60



Allowance for Loan Losses
 
September 30, 2016
In billions of dollars
Allowance for
loan losses
Loans, net of
unearned income
Allowance as a
percentage of loans(1)
North America cards(2)
$
5.0

$
125.3

4.0
%
North America mortgages(3)
1.2

74.7

1.6

North America other
0.5

13.5

3.7

International cards
1.4

25.1

5.6

International other(4)
1.6

90.1

1.8

Total consumer
$
9.7

$
328.7

3.0
%
Total corporate
2.7

309.7

0.9

Total Citigroup
$
12.4

$
638.4

2.0
%
(1)
Allowance as a percentage of loans excludes loans that are carried at fair value.
(2)
Includes both Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services. The $5.0 billion of loan loss reserves represented approximately 17 months of coincident net credit loss coverage.
(3)
Of the $1.2 billion, approximately $1.1 billion was allocated to North America mortgages in Citi Holdings. Of the $1.2 billion, approximately $0.5 billion and $0.7 billion are determined in accordance with ASC 450-20 and ASC 310-10-35 (troubled debt restructurings), respectively. Of the $74.7 billion in loans, approximately $69.2 billion and $5.3 billion of the loans are evaluated in accordance with ASC 450-20 and ASC 310-10-35 (troubled debt restructurings), respectively. For additional information, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)
Includes mortgages and other retail loans.

 
December 31, 2015
In billions of dollars
Allowance for
loan losses
Loans, net of
unearned income
Allowance as a
percentage of loans(1)
North America cards(2)
$
4.5

$
113.4

4.0
%
North America mortgages(3)
1.7

79.6

2.1

North America other
0.5

13.0

3.8

International cards
1.6

26.7

6.0

International other(4)
1.5

93.1

1.6

Total consumer
$
9.8

$
325.8

3.0
%
Total corporate
2.8

291.8

1.0

Total Citigroup
$
12.6

$
617.6

2.1
%
(1)
Allowance as a percentage of loans excludes loans that are carried at fair value.
(2)
Includes both Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services. The $4.5 billion of loan loss reserves represented approximately 15 months of coincident net credit loss coverage.
(3)
Of the $1.7 billion, approximately $1.6 billion was allocated to North America mortgages in Citi Holdings. Of the $1.7 billion, approximately $0.6 billion and $1.1 billion are determined in accordance with ASC 450-20 and ASC 310-10-35 (troubled debt restructurings), respectively. Of the $79.6 billion in loans, approximately $72.3 billion and $7.1 billion of the loans are evaluated in accordance with ASC 450-20 and ASC 310-10-35 (troubled debt restructurings), respectively. For additional information, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)
Includes mortgages and other retail loans.

61



Non-Accrual Loans and Assets and Renegotiated Loans
There is a certain amount of overlap among non-accrual loans and assets and renegotiated loans. The following summary provides a general description of each category:

Non-Accrual Loans and Assets:
Corporate and consumer (commercial market) non-accrual status is based on the determination that payment of interest or principal is doubtful.
A corporate loan may be classified as non-accrual and still be performing under the terms of the loan structure. Payments received on corporate non-accrual loans are generally applied to loan principal and not reflected as interest income. Approximately 67% of Citi’s corporate non-accrual loans were performing at September 30, 2016, compared to 66% at June 30, 2016.
Consumer non-accrual status is generally based on aging, i.e., the borrower has fallen behind on payments.
Mortgage loans in regulated bank entities discharged through Chapter 7 bankruptcy, other than FHA insured loans, are classified as non-accrual. Non-bank mortgage loans discharged through Chapter 7 bankruptcy are classified as non-accrual at 90 days or more past due. In addition, home equity loans in regulated bank entities are classified as non-accrual if the related residential first mortgage loan is 90 days or more past due.
North America Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services are not included because, under industry standards, credit card loans accrue interest until such loans are charged off, which typically occurs at 180 days contractual delinquency.
Renegotiated Loans:
Includes both corporate and consumer loans whose terms have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring (TDR).
Includes both accrual and non-accrual TDRs.



62



Non-Accrual Loans and Assets
The table below summarizes Citigroup’s non-accrual loans as of the periods indicated. Non-accrual loans may still be current on interest payments. In situations where Citi reasonably expects that only a portion of the principal owed will ultimately be collected, all payments received are reflected as a reduction of principal and not as interest income. For all other non-accrual loans, cash interest receipts are generally recorded as revenue.
 
As set forth in the tables below, Citi’s corporate non-accrual loans within Citicorp decreased during the third quarter of 2016 by 2% or approximately $45 million, driven primarily by energy and energy-related exposures in North America last quarter (for additional information on these exposures, see “Corporate Credit” above).


 
Sept. 30,
Jun. 30,
Mar. 31,
Dec. 31,
Sept. 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2016
2016
2015
2015
Citicorp
$
3,977

$
4,101

$
3,718

$
2,991

$
2,921

Citi Holdings
1,990

2,064

2,210

2,263

3,486

Total non-accrual loans
$
5,967

$
6,165

$
5,928

$
5,254

$
6,407

Corporate non-accrual loans(1)(2)





North America
$
1,057

$
1,280

$
1,331

$
818

$
833

EMEA
857

762

469

347

386

Latin America
380

267

410

303

230

Asia
121

151

117

128

129

Total corporate non-accrual loans
$
2,415

$
2,460

$
2,327

$
1,596

$
1,578

Citicorp
$
2,365

$
2,410

$
2,275

$
1,543

$
1,525

Citi Holdings
50

50

52

53

53

Total corporate non-accrual loans
$
2,415

$
2,460

$
2,327

$
1,596

$
1,578

Consumer non-accrual loans(1)(3)
 
 
 
 
 
North America
$
2,429

$
2,520

$
2,519

$
2,515

$
3,622

Latin America
841

884

817

874

935

Asia(4)
282

301

265

269

272

Total consumer non-accrual loans
$
3,552

$
3,705

$
3,601

$
3,658

$
4,829

Citicorp
$
1,612

$
1,691

$
1,443

$
1,448

$
1,396

Citi Holdings
1,940

2,014

2,158

2,210

3,433

Total consumer non-accrual loans          
$
3,552

$
3,705

$
3,601

$
3,658

$
4,829

(1)
Excludes purchased distressed loans, as they are generally accreting interest. The carrying value of these loans was $194 million at September 30, 2016, $212 million at June 30, 2016, $236 million at March 31, 2016, $250 million at December 31, 2015 and $320 million at September 30, 2015.
(2)
The increases in corporate non-accrual loans in the first quarter of 2016 primarily related to Citi’s North America and EMEA energy and energy-related corporate credit exposure.
(3) The December 31, 2015 decline includes the impact related to the transfer of approximately $8 billion of mortgage loans to Loans, held-for-sale (HFS) (included within Other assets).
(4) Asia GCB includes balances in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.


63



The changes in Citigroup’s non-accrual loans were as follows:

 
Three months ended
Three months ended
 
September 30, 2016
September 30, 2015
In millions of dollars
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Non-accrual loans at beginning of period
$
2,460

$
3,705

$
6,165

$
1,223

$
5,261

$
6,484

Additions
469

1,131

1,600

626

1,094

1,720

Sales and transfers to held-for-sale
(4
)
(102
)
(106
)
(39
)
(275
)
(314
)
Returned to performing
(58
)
(149
)
(207
)
(39
)
(258
)
(297
)
Paydowns/settlements
(433
)
(562
)
(995
)
(95
)
(323
)
(418
)
Charge-offs
(24
)
(455
)
(479
)
(34
)
(573
)
(607
)
Other
5

(16
)
(11
)
(64
)
(97
)
(161
)
Ending balance
$
2,415

$
3,552

$
5,967

$
1,578

$
4,829

$
6,407


 
Nine months ended
Nine months ended
 
September 30, 2016
September 30, 2015
In millions of dollars
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Non-accrual loans at beginning of period
$
1,596

$
3,658

$
5,254

$
1,202

$
5,905

$
7,107

Additions
2,346

3,371

5,717

1,114

4,027

5,141

Sales and transfers to held-for-sale
(13
)
(473
)
(486
)
(215
)
(1,030
)
(1,245
)
Returned to performing
(141
)
(434
)
(575
)
(60
)
(865
)
(925
)
Paydowns/settlements
(1,022
)
(1,203
)
(2,225
)
(337
)
(939
)
(1,276
)
Charge-offs
(277
)
(1,353
)
(1,630
)
(92
)
(2,059
)
(2,151
)
Other
(74
)
(14
)
(88
)
(34
)
(210
)
(244
)
Ending balance
$
2,415

$
3,552

$
5,967

$
1,578

$
4,829

$
6,407



64



The table below summarizes Citigroup’s other real estate owned (OREO) assets as of the periods indicated. This represents the carrying value of all real estate property acquired by foreclosure or other legal proceedings when Citi has taken possession of the collateral:
 
Sept. 30,
Jun. 30,
Mar. 31,
Dec. 31,
Sept. 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2016
2015
2015
2015
OREO
 
 
 
 
 
Citicorp
$
57

$
54

$
74

$
70

$
83

Citi Holdings
104

121

131

139

144

Total OREO
$
161

$
175

$
205

$
209

$
227

North America
$
132

$
151

$
159

$
166

$
177

EMEA
1


1

1

1

Latin America
18

19

35

38

44

Asia
10

5

10

4

5

Total OREO
$
161

$
175

$
205

$
209

$
227

Non-accrual assets—Total Citigroup 





Corporate non-accrual loans
$
2,415

$
2,460

$
2,327

$
1,596

$
1,578

Consumer non-accrual loans
3,552

3,705

3,601

3,658

4,829

Non-accrual loans (NAL)
$
5,967

$
6,165

$
5,928

$
5,254

$
6,407

OREO
$
161

$
175

$
205

$
209

$
227

Non-accrual assets (NAA)
$
6,128

$
6,340

$
6,133

$
5,463

$
6,634

NAL as a percentage of total loans
0.94
%
0.97
%
0.96
%
0.85
%
1.03
%
NAA as a percentage of total assets
0.34

0.35

0.34

0.32

0.37

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1)
208

200

214

240

213


 
Sept. 30,
Jun. 30,
Mar. 31,
Dec. 31,
Sept. 30,
Non-accrual assets—Total Citicorp
2016
2016
2015
2015
2015
Non-accrual loans (NAL)
$
3,977

$
4,101

$
3,718

$
2,991

$
2,921

OREO
57

54

74

70

83

Non-accrual assets (NAA)
$
4,034

$
4,155

$
3,792

$
3,061

$
3,004

NAA as a percentage of total assets
0.23
%
0.24
%
0.22
%
0.19
%
0.18
%
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1)
270

254

284

345

350

Non-accrual assets—Total Citi Holdings





Non-accrual loans (NAL)(2)
$
1,990

$
2,064

$
2,210

$
2,263

$
3,486

OREO
104

121

131

139

144

Non-accrual assets (NAA)
$
2,094

$
2,185

$
2,341

$
2,402

$
3,630

NAA as a percentage of total assets
3.43
%
3.31
%
3.21
%
2.97
%
3.10
%
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1)
86

91

98

101

98


(1)
The allowance for loan losses includes the allowance for Citi’s credit card portfolios and purchased distressed loans, while the non-accrual loans exclude credit card balances (with the exception of certain international portfolios) and purchased distressed loans as these continue to accrue interest until charge-off.
(2)
The December 31, 2015 decline includes the impact related to the transfer of approximately $8 billion of mortgage loans to Loans, held-for-sale (HFS) (included within Other assets).




65



Renegotiated Loans
The following table presents Citi’s loans modified in TDRs.
In millions of dollars
Sep. 30, 2016
Dec. 31, 2015
Corporate renegotiated loans(1)
 
 
In U.S. offices
 
 
Commercial and industrial(2)
$
81

$
25

Mortgage and real estate(3)
78

104

Loans to financial institutions
10

5

Other
255

273

 
$
424

$
407

In offices outside the U.S.
 
 
Commercial and industrial(2)
$
313

$
111

Mortgage and real estate(3)
2

33

Other
36

45

 
$
351

$
189

Total corporate renegotiated loans
$
775

$
596

Consumer renegotiated loans(4)(5)(6)
 
 
In U.S. offices
 
 
Mortgage and real estate(7)
$
5,206

$
7,058

Cards
1,292

1,396

Installment and other
88

79

 
$
6,586

$
8,533

In offices outside the U.S.
 
 
Mortgage and real estate
$
496

$
517

Cards
539

555

Installment and other
470

471

 
$
1,505

$
1,543

Total consumer renegotiated loans
$
8,091

$
10,076

(1)
Includes $476 million and $258 million of non-accrual loans included in the non-accrual assets table above at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The remaining loans are accruing interest.
(2)
In addition to modifications reflected as TDRs at September 30, 2016, Citi also modified $252 million commercial loans risk rated “Substandard Non-Performing” or worse (asset category defined by banking regulators) all within offices in the U.S. These modifications were not considered TDRs because the modifications did not involve a concession (a required element of a TDR for accounting purposes).
(3)
In addition to modifications reflected as TDRs at September 30, 2016, Citi also modified $13 million of commercial real estate loans risk rated “Substandard Non-Performing” or worse (asset category defined by banking regulators) in offices inside the U.S. These modifications were not considered TDRs because the modifications did not involve a concession (a required element of a TDR for accounting purposes).
(4)
Includes $1,691 million and $1,852 million of non-accrual loans included in the non-accrual assets table above at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The remaining loans are accruing interest.
(5)
Includes $78 million and $96 million of commercial real estate loans at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
(6)
Includes $78 million and $85 million of other commercial loans at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
(7)
Reduction in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 includes $1,366 million related to TDRs sold or transferred to held-for-sale.



66



LIQUIDITY RISK

For additional information on funding and liquidity at Citigroup, including its objectives, management and measurement, see “Liquidity Risk” and “Risk Factors” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
 





High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA)
 
Citibank
Non-Bank and Other(1)
Total
In billions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2016
Jun. 30, 2016
Sept. 30, 2015
Sept. 30, 2016
Jun. 30, 2016
Sept. 30, 2015
Sept. 30, 2016
Jun. 30, 2016
Sept. 30, 2015
Available cash
$
71.1

$
61.3

$
68.9

$
19.2

$
23.2

$
21.5

$
90.2

$
84.5

$
90.4

U.S. sovereign
122.3

115.0

119.6

21.8

19.6

22.4

144.1

134.6

142.0

U.S. agency/agency MBS
62.6

69.2

60.1

0.2

0.3

1.0

62.8

69.5

61.1

Foreign government debt(2)
89.2

86.7

87.6

15.5

16.8

15.5

104.7

103.5

103.1

Other investment grade
1.0

1.2

0.8

1.5

1.5

1.5

2.5

2.7

2.3

Total HQLA (EOP)
$
346.2

$
333.4

$
337.0

$
58.2

$
61.4

$
61.9

$
404.3

$
394.8

$
398.9

Total HQLA (AVG)
$
344.0

$
342.5

$

$
59.8

$
68.5

$

$
403.8

$
411.0

$


Note: Except as indicated, amounts set forth in the table above are as of period end and may increase or decrease intra-period in the ordinary course of business. For securities, the amounts represent the liquidity value that potentially could be realized, and thus exclude any securities that are encumbered, as well as the haircuts that would be required for securities financing transactions. As previously disclosed (see “Liquidity Risk” in the First Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q), the Federal Reserve Board has proposed requiring disclosure of HQLA, the Liquidity Coverage Ratio and related components on an average basis each quarter, as compared to end-of-period. Citi has presented the average information on these metrics currently available, which includes average total HQLA, average LCR and average net outflows under the LCR for the periods 3Q’16 and 2Q’16; 3Q’15 and other component information is not currently available.
(1)
“Non-Bank and Other” includes the parent holding company (Citigroup), Citi’s broker-dealer subsidiaries and other non-bank subsidiaries that are consolidated into Citigroup as well as Citibanamex and Citibank (Switzerland) AG. Citibanamex and Citibank (Switzerland) AG account for approximately $7 billion of the “Non-Bank and Other” HQLA balance as of September 30, 2016.
(2)
Foreign government debt includes securities issued or guaranteed by foreign sovereigns, agencies and multilateral development banks. Foreign government debt securities are held largely to support local liquidity requirements and Citi’s local franchises, and principally include government bonds from Hong Kong, Korea, Singapore, India, Brazil and Mexico.

As set forth in the table above, sequentially, Citi’s total HQLA increased on an end-of-period basis but declined on an average basis. The end-of-period increase was primarily driven by an increase in available cash at Citibank due to an increase in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings (see “Secured Funding Transactions and Short-Term Borrowings” below), while the reduction in the average was mainly attributable to higher average loan and non-HQLA trading asset growth.
Citi’s HQLA as set forth above does not include Citi’s additional available borrowing capacity from the FHLBs of which Citi is a member, which was approximately $24 billion as of September 30, 2016 (compared to $37 billion as of June 30, 2016 and $36 billion as of September 30, 2015) and maintained by eligible collateral pledged to such banks. The HQLA also does not include Citi’s borrowing capacity at the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank discount window or other central banks, which would be in addition to the resources noted above.
In general, Citi’s liquidity is fungible across legal entities within its bank group. Citi’s bank subsidiaries, including Citibank, can lend to the Citi parent and broker-dealer entities in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. As of September 30, 2016, the capacity available for lending to these entities under Section 23A was approximately $15 billion, unchanged from June 30, 2016 and compared to $17
 

billion as of September 30, 2015, subject to certain eligible non-cash collateral requirements.



67



Loans
The table below sets forth the end-of-period loans, by business and/or segment, and the total average loans for each of the periods indicated:
In billions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2016
Jun. 30, 2016
Sept. 30, 2015
Global Consumer Banking
 
 
 
North America
$
180.0

$
175.6

$
158.9

Latin America
23.9

24.5

25.2

Asia(1)
85.8

85.1

85.6

Total
$
289.7

$
285.2

$
269.7

Institutional Clients Group
 
 
 
Corporate lending
120.8

123.9

120.4

Treasury and trade solutions (TTS)
72.3

73.6

73.5

Private bank, markets and securities services and other
116.5

109.4

99.1

Total
$
309.6

$
306.9

$
293.0

Total Citicorp
599.3

592.1

562.7

Total Citi Holdings
39.1

41.4

59.7

Total Citigroup loans (EOP)
$
638.4

$
633.5

$
622.4

Total Citigroup loans (AVG)
$
634.9

$
620.6

$
623.2


(1)
Includes loans in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.

As set forth on the table above, end-of-period loans increased 3% year-over-year and 1% quarter-over-quarter, both on a reported basis and excluding the impact of FX translation, as growth in Citicorp offset continued reductions in Citi Holdings.
Excluding the impact of FX translation, Citicorp loans increased 7% year-over-year. GCB loans grew 7% year-over-year, driven by 13% growth in North America. Within North America, Citi-branded cards increased 25% year-over-year, primarily due to the acquisition of the Costco portfolio towards the end of the second quarter of 2016. International GCB loans declined 1%, as continued growth in Mexico was more than offset by a 4% decline in Asia reflecting the product repositioning of the retail portfolio in this region away from lower return mortgage loans. ICG loans increased 6% year-over-year. Within ICG, corporate loans increased 1% primarily driven by the funding of transaction-related commitments to target market clients, partially offset by loan sale activity. On an average basis, the corporate lending portfolio increased 4%. Treasury and trade solutions loans declined 2% as the business continued to support its clients while distributing trade loan originations to optimize the balance sheet in a continued low rate environment. Private bank and markets and securities services loans grew 19% year-over-year. Private bank growth was primarily driven by real estate and investment-related lending to target clients as Citi sought to deepen client relationships at attractive return levels. Markets growth included lending to target clients in advance of capital markets issuance.
 
Citi Holdings loans decreased 35% year-over-year driven by $17 billion of reductions in North America mortgages, including transfers to held-for-sale (see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Deposits
The table below sets forth the end-of-period deposits, by business and/or segment, and the total average deposits for each of the periods indicated:
In billions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2016
Jun. 30, 2016
Sept. 30, 2015
Global Consumer Banking
 
 
 
North America
$
185.6

$
183.3

$
180.0

Latin America
27.4

28.2

26.2

Asia(1)
93.6

90.5

87.0

Total
$
306.6

$
302.0

$
293.2

Institutional Clients Group
 
 
 
Treasury and trade solutions (TTS)
415.0

405.0

398.5

Banking ex-TTS
118.9

116.4

117.5

Markets and securities services
83.3

85.4

79.1

Total
$
617.2

$
606.8

$
595.1

Corporate/Other
10.6

22.7

5.3

Total Citicorp
$
934.4

$
931.5

$
893.6

Total Citi Holdings
5.9

6.4

10.6

Total Citigroup deposits (EOP)
$
940.3

$
937.9

$
904.2

Total Citigroup deposits (AVG)
$
944.2

$
935.6

$
903.1

(1)
Includes deposits in certain EMEA countries for all periods presented.

End-of-period deposits increased 4% year-over-year and remained relatively unchanged quarter-over-quarter, both on a reported basis and excluding the impact of FX translation.
Excluding the impact of FX translation, Citicorp deposits grew 5% year-over-year. Within Citicorp, GCB deposits increased 5% year-over-year, driven by broad-based growth across all regions. ICG deposits increased 4% year-over-year, driven primarily by treasury and trade solutions, as the business continued to support client activity.



68



Long-Term Debt
The weighted-average maturities of unsecured long-term debt issued by Citigroup and its affiliates (including Citibank) with a remaining life greater than one year (excluding remaining trust preferred securities outstanding) was approximately 7.0 years as of September 30, 2016, unchanged sequentially and an increase from 6.8 years in the prior-year period. The increase year-over-year was due primarily to the issuance of longer-dated debt securities during the third quarter of 2016, including in response to proposed total loss-absorbing capacity, or TLAC, requirements (for additional information on TLAC, see “Liquidity Risk—Long-Term Debt—Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC)” and “Risk Factors—Liquidity Risks” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K).
Citi’s long-term debt outstanding at the parent includes senior and subordinated debt and what Citi refers to as customer-related debt, consisting of structured notes, such as equity- and credit-linked notes, as well as non-structured notes. Citi’s issuance of customer-related debt is generally driven by customer demand and supplements benchmark debt issuance as a source of funding for Citi’s parent entities. Citi’s long-term debt at the bank also includes FHLB advances and securitizations.

 
Long-Term Debt Outstanding
The following table sets forth Citi’s total long-term debt outstanding for the periods indicated:
In billions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2016
Jun. 30, 2016
Sept. 30, 2015
Parent and other(1)






Benchmark debt:
 
 
 
Senior debt
$
97.1

$
96.1

$
99.5

Subordinated debt
28.8

28.8

26.8

Trust preferred
1.7

1.7

1.7

Customer-related debt:



Structured debt
23.6

22.5

23.1

Non-structured debt
3.5

3.3

3.6

Local country and other(2)
2.7

2.3

2.1

Total parent and other
$
157.4

$
154.8

$
156.8

Bank






FHLB borrowings
$
21.6

$
19.6

$
17.3

Securitizations(3)
24.4

27.3

32.0

Local country and other(2)
5.8

5.8

7.4

Total bank
$
51.7

$
52.6

$
56.7

Total long-term debt
$
209.1

$
207.4

$
213.5

Note: Amounts represent the current value of long-term debt on Citi’s Consolidated Balance Sheet which, for certain debt instruments, includes consideration of fair value, hedging impacts and unamortized discounts and premiums.
(1)
“Parent and other” includes long-term debt issued to third parties by the parent holding company (Citigroup) and Citi’s non-bank subsidiaries (including broker-dealer subsidiaries) that are consolidated into Citigroup. As of September 30, 2016 “parent and other” included $8.3 billion of long-term debt issued by Citi’s broker-dealer subsidiaries.
(2)
Local country debt includes debt issued by Citi’s affiliates in support of their local operations.
(3)
Predominantly credit card securitizations, primarily backed by Citi-branded credit card receivables.

Year-over-year, Citi’s total long-term debt outstanding decreased primarily due to continued reductions in securitizations at the bank entities.
As part of its liability management and to assist it in meeting regulatory changes and requirements, Citi has considered, and may continue to consider, opportunities to repurchase its long-term debt pursuant to open market purchases, tender offers or other means. Such repurchases help reduce Citi’s overall funding costs. During the third quarter of 2016, Citi repurchased an aggregate of approximately $1.6 billion of its outstanding long-term debt.






69



Long-Term Debt Issuances and Maturities
The table below details Citi’s long-term debt issuances and maturities (including repurchases and redemptions) during the periods presented:
 
3Q16
2Q16
3Q15
In billions of dollars
Maturities
Issuances
Maturities
Issuances
Maturities
Issuances
Parent and other












Benchmark debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior debt
$
3.3

$
4.5

$
5.1

$
6.6

$
2.8

$
3.4

Subordinated debt
1.3

1.5

1.7

1.0

0.7

2.0

Trust preferred






Customer-related debt:


 
 
 
 
Structured debt
2.2

3.0

3.4

2.0

1.5

1.6

Non-structured debt
0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.8

0.1

Local country and other
0.1

0.4

1.9


0.1

0.5

Total parent and other
$
6.9

$
9.6

$
12.2

$
9.7

$
5.9

$
7.6

Bank












FHLB borrowings
$
2.8

$
5.8

$
1.0

$
2.5

$
0.5

$
1.0

Securitizations
3.0


1.3


0.7

0.8

Local country and other
0.9

0.9

1.1

1.0

0.6

0.2

Total bank
$
6.7

$
6.7

$
3.4

$
3.5

$
1.8

$
2.0

Total
$
13.6

$
16.3

$
15.6

$
13.2

$
7.7

$
9.6


The table below shows Citi’s aggregate long-term debt maturities (including repurchases and redemptions) year-to-date in 2016, as well as its aggregate expected annual long-term debt maturities as of September 30, 2016:
 
Maturities
2016 YTD
 
 
In billions of dollars
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Total
Parent and other


















Benchmark debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Senior debt
$
12.7

$
1.8

$
14.3

$
18.4

$
14.6

$
6.6

$
11.2

$
30.3

$
97.1

Subordinated debt
3.0


1.2

1.0

1.3



25.3

28.8

Trust preferred







1.7

1.7

Customer-related debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Structured debt
7.7

1.2

3.5

2.7

2.1

2.3

1.9

9.9

23.6

Non-structured debt
0.4

0.2

0.5

0.6

0.2

0.2

0.1

1.6

3.5

Local country and other
2.0


0.3

0.2

0.1

0.1


1.9

2.7

Total parent and other
$
25.8

$
3.2

$
19.9

$
22.9

$
18.3

$
9.2

$
13.2

$
70.7

$
157.4

Bank


















FHLB borrowings
$
5.5

$
4.1

$
8.8

$
8.8

$

$

$

$

$
21.6

Securitizations
6.6

5.1

5.3

8.4

1.9

0.1

2.5

1.0

24.4

Local country and other
2.7

1.1

1.9

1.0

0.4

1.0

0.2

0.2

5.8

Total bank
$
14.7

$
10.3

$
16.0

$
18.2

$
2.4

$
1.2

$
2.6

$
1.2

$
51.7

Total long-term debt
$
40.6

$
13.5

$
35.8

$
41.1

$
20.7

$
10.3

$
15.8

$
71.8

$
209.1




70



Resolution Plan
Under Title I of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act), Citigroup has developed a “single point of entry” resolution strategy and plan under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Resolution Plan). Under Citi’s Resolution Plan, only Citigroup, the parent holding company, would enter into bankruptcy, while Citigroup’s key operating subsidiaries, including Citibank, N.A., among others, would remain operational and outside of any resolution or insolvency proceedings. Citigroup believes its Resolution Plan has been designed to minimize the risk of systemic impact to the U.S. and global financial systems, while maximizing the value of the bankruptcy estate for the benefit of Citigroup’s creditors, including its unsecured long-term debt holders. In addition, in line with the Federal Reserve Board’s TLAC proposal, Citigroup believes it has developed the Resolution Plan so that Citigroup’s shareholders and unsecured creditors - including its unsecured long-term debt holders - bear any losses resulting from Citigroup’s bankruptcy. For additional information on the Federal Reserve Board’s TLAC proposal, see “Risk Factors - Liquidity Risks” and “Liquidity Risk-Long-Term Debt-Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC)” in Citigroup’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In response to feedback received from the Federal Reserve Board and FDIC (the Agencies) on Citi’s 2015 Resolution Plan, Citi currently expects to take the following actions in connection with its 2017 Resolution Plan submission (to be submitted by July 1, 2017):

(i)
Citicorp, an existing wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup and current parent company of Citibank, N.A., would be established as an intermediate holding company (an IHC) for some or all of Citigroup’s key operating subsidiaries;
(ii)
subject to final approval of the Board of Directors of Citigroup, Citigroup would execute an inter-affiliate agreement with Citicorp, Citigroup’s key operating subsidiaries and certain other affiliated entities pursuant to which Citicorp would be required to provide liquidity and capital support to Citigroup’s key operating subsidiaries in the event Citigroup were to enter bankruptcy proceedings (Citi Support Agreement);
(iii)
pursuant to the Citi Support Agreement:
upon execution, Citigroup would make an initial contribution of assets, including certain HQLA and inter-affiliate loans (Contributable Assets), to Citicorp, and Citicorp would then become the business as usual funding vehicle for certain of Citigroup’s key operating subsidiaries;
Citigroup would be obligated to continue to transfer Contributable Assets to Citicorp over time, subject to certain amounts retained by Citigroup to, among other things, meet Citigroup’s near-term cash needs;
in the event of a Citigroup bankruptcy, Citigroup would be required to contribute most of its remaining assets to Citicorp; and
 
(iv)
the obligations of both Citigroup and Citicorp under the Citi Support Agreement, as well as the Contributable Assets, would be secured pursuant to a security agreement.

Citigroup also expects that the Citi Support Agreement will provide two mechanisms, besides Citicorp’s issuing of dividends to Citigroup, pursuant to which Citicorp would be required to transfer cash to Citigroup during business as usual so that Citigroup can fund its debt service as well as other operating needs: (i) one or more funding notes issued by Citicorp to Citigroup; and (ii) a committed line of credit under which Citicorp may make loans to Citigroup.

Secured Funding Transactions and Short-Term Borrowings
Citi supplements its primary sources of funding with short-term borrowings. Short-term borrowings generally include (i) secured funding transactions (securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, or repos) and (ii) to a lesser extent, short-term borrowings consisting of commercial paper and borrowings from the FHLB and other market participants. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on Citigroup’s and its affiliates’ outstanding short-term borrowings.
Outside of secured funding transactions, Citi’s short-term borrowings increased both year-over-year (a 25% increase) and sequentially (a 60% increase) driven by an increase in FHLB borrowing, as Citi purposefully replaced corporate CDs to optimize liquidity across its legal vehicles.

Secured Funding
Secured funding is primarily accessed through Citi’s broker-dealer subsidiaries to fund efficiently both secured lending activity and a portion of securities inventory held in the context of market making and customer activities. Citi also executes a smaller portion of its secured funding transactions through its bank entities, which is typically collateralized by foreign government debt securities. Generally, daily changes in the level of Citi’s secured funding are primarily due to fluctuations in secured lending activity in the matched book (as described below) and securities inventory.
Secured funding of $153 billion as of September 30, 2016 declined 9% from the prior-year period and 3% sequentially. Excluding the impact of FX translation, secured funding decreased 7% from the prior-year period and 3% sequentially, both driven by normal business activity. Average balances for secured funding were approximately $158 billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2016.
The portion of secured funding in the broker-dealer subsidiaries that funds secured lending is commonly referred to as “matched book” activity. The majority of this activity is secured by high quality, liquid securities such as U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. agency securities and foreign government debt securities. Other secured funding is secured by less liquid securities, including equity securities, corporate bonds and asset-backed securities. The tenor of Citi’s matched book liabilities is generally equal to or longer than the tenor of the corresponding matched book assets.


71



The remainder of the secured funding activity in the broker-dealer subsidiaries serves to fund securities inventory held in the context of market making and customer activities. To maintain reliable funding under a wide range of market conditions, including under periods of stress, Citi manages these activities by taking into consideration the quality of the underlying collateral, and stipulating financing tenor. The weighted average maturity of Citi’s secured funding of less liquid securities inventory was greater than 110 days as of September 30, 2016.
Citi manages the risks in its secured funding by conducting daily stress tests to account for changes in capacity, tenors, haircut, collateral profile and client actions. Additionally, Citi maintains counterparty diversification by establishing concentration triggers and assessing counterparty reliability and stability under stress. Citi generally sources secured funding from more than 150 counterparties.

Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
In addition to internal measures that Citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario, Citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the LCR, as calculated pursuant to the U.S. LCR rules (for additional information, see “Liquidity Risk” in each of Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K and First Quarter 2016 Form 10-Q). The table below sets forth the components of Citi’s LCR calculation and HQLA in excess of net outflows as of the periods indicated:
In billions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2016
Jun. 30, 2016

Sept. 30, 2015
HQLA
$
403.8

$
411.0

$
398.9

Net outflows
335.3

339.8

355.6

LCR
120
%
121
%
112
%
HQLA in excess of net outflows
$
68.5

$
71.2

$
43.3

Note: Amounts for 3Q’16 and 2Q’16 set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis; amounts for 3Q’15 are presented end-of-period. Accordingly, data in 3Q’16 and 2Q’16 is not directly comparable to data in 3Q’15.
As set forth in the table above, sequentially, Citi’s LCR decreased slightly, reflecting both the decrease in average HQLA (as described above) and a slight decline in average net outflows due primarily to a reduction in average unsecured long-term debt maturing within 30 days.
















72



Credit Ratings
The table below sets forth the ratings for Citigroup and Citibank as of September 30, 2016. While not included in the table below, the long-term and short-term ratings of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (CGMI) were A/A-1 at Standard & Poor’s and A+/F1 at Fitch as of September 30, 2016. The long-term and short-term ratings of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI) were BBB+/A-2 at Standard & Poor’s and A/F1 at Fitch as of September 30, 2016.
 



 
Citigroup Inc.
Citibank, N.A.
 
Senior
debt
Commercial
paper
Outlook
Long-
term
Short-
term
Outlook
Fitch Ratings (Fitch)
A
F1
Stable
A+
F1
Stable
Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s)
Baa1
P-2
Stable
A1
P-1
Stable
Standard & Poor’s (S&P)
BBB+
A-2
Stable
A
A-1
Watch Positive

Potential Impacts of Ratings Downgrades
Ratings downgrades by Moody’s, Fitch or S&P could negatively impact Citigroup’s and/or Citibank’s funding and liquidity due to reduced funding capacity, including derivative triggers, which could take the form of cash obligations and collateral requirements.
The following information is provided for the purpose of analyzing the potential funding and liquidity impact to Citigroup and Citibank of a hypothetical, simultaneous
ratings downgrade across all three major rating agencies. This analysis is subject to certain estimates, estimation methodologies, and judgments and uncertainties. Uncertainties include potential ratings limitations that certain entities may have with respect to permissible counterparties, as well as general subjective counterparty behavior. For example, certain corporate customers and markets counterparties could re-evaluate their business relationships with Citi and limit transactions in certain contracts or market instruments with Citi. Changes in counterparty behavior could impact Citi’s funding and liquidity, as well as the results of operations of certain of its businesses. The actual impact to Citigroup or Citibank is unpredictable and may differ materially from the potential funding and liquidity impacts described below. For additional information on the impact of credit rating changes on Citi and its applicable subsidiaries, see “Risk Factors— Liquidity Risks” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Citigroup Inc. and Citibank—Potential Derivative Triggers
As of September 30, 2016, Citi estimates that a hypothetical one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc. across all three major rating agencies could impact Citigroup’s funding and liquidity due to derivative triggers by approximately $0.5 billion, compared to $1.2 billion as of June 30, 2016. The decline sequentially was primarily due to reduced market volatility in the current quarter as compared to the elevated levels in the second quarter of 2016 resulting from the U.K.’s vote to leave the European Union in June 2016. Other funding sources, such as securities financing transactions and other margin requirements, for which there are no explicit triggers, could also be adversely affected.
As of September 30, 2016, Citi estimates that a hypothetical one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citibank across all three major rating agencies could impact Citibank’s funding and liquidity by approximately $1.3 billion, compared to $2.1 billion as of June 30, 2016, due to derivative triggers. The sequential decline was also due to the reduced market volatility in the current quarter, as referenced above.
In total, Citi estimates that a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup and Citibank, across all three major rating agencies, could result in aggregate cash obligations and collateral requirements of approximately $1.8 billion, compared to $3.3 billion as of June 30, 2016 (see also Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). As set forth under “High-Quality Liquid Assets” above, the liquidity resources of Citibank were approximately $344 billion and the liquidity resources of Citi’s non-bank and other entities were approximately $60 billion, for a total of approximately $404 billion as of September 30, 2016. These liquidity resources are available in part as a contingency for the potential events described above.
In addition, a broad range of mitigating actions are currently included in Citigroup’s and Citibank’s contingency funding plans. For Citigroup, these mitigating factors include, but are not limited to, accessing surplus funding capacity from existing clients, tailoring levels of secured lending, and


73



adjusting the size of select trading books and collateralized borrowings from certain Citibank subsidiaries. Mitigating actions available to Citibank include, but are not limited to, selling or financing highly liquid government securities, tailoring levels of secured lending, adjusting the size of select trading assets, reducing loan originations and renewals, raising additional deposits, or borrowing from the FHLB or central banks. Citi believes these mitigating actions could substantially reduce the funding and liquidity risk, if any, of the potential downgrades described above.
 
Citibank—Additional Potential Impacts
In addition to the above derivative triggers, Citi believes that a potential one-notch downgrade of Citibank’s senior debt/long-term rating by S&P could also have an adverse impact on the commercial paper/short-term rating of Citibank. As of September 30, 2016, Citibank had liquidity commitments of approximately $10.1 billion to consolidated asset-backed commercial paper conduits, compared to $10.0 billion as of June 30, 2016 (as referenced in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
In addition to the above-referenced liquidity resources of certain Citibank and Citibanamex entities, Citibank could reduce the funding and liquidity risk, if any, of the potential downgrades described above through mitigating actions, including repricing or reducing certain commitments to commercial paper conduits. In the event of the potential downgrades described above, Citi believes that certain corporate customers could re-evaluate their deposit relationships with Citibank. This re-evaluation could result in clients adjusting their discretionary deposit levels or changing their depository institution, which could potentially reduce certain deposit levels at Citibank. However, Citi could choose to adjust pricing, offer alternative deposit products to its existing customers or seek to attract deposits from new customers, in addition to the mitigating actions referenced above.


74



MARKET RISK

Market risk emanates from both Citi’s trading and non-trading portfolios. Trading portfolios comprise all assets and liabilities marked-to-market, with results reflected in earnings. Non-trading portfolios include all other assets and liabilities.
For additional information, see “Market Risk” and “Risk Factors” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 
Market Risk of Non-Trading Portfolios
For additional information on Citi’s net interest revenue (for interest rate exposure purposes), interest rate risk and interest rate risk measurement, see “Market Risk of Non-Trading Portfolios” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following table sets forth the estimated impact to Citi’s net interest revenue, AOCI and the Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (on a fully implemented basis), each assuming an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100 basis point increase in interest rates.
In millions of dollars (unless otherwise noted)
Sept. 30, 2016
Jun. 30, 2016
Sept. 30, 2015
Estimated annualized impact to net interest revenue
 
 
 
U.S. dollar(1)
$
1,405

$
1,394

$
1,533

All other currencies
574

590

616

Total
$
1,979

$
1,984

$
2,149

As a percentage of average interest-earning assets
0.12
%
0.12
%
0.13
%
Estimated initial impact to AOCI (after-tax)(2)
$
(4,868
)
$
(4,628
)
$
(4,450
)
Estimated initial impact on Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (bps)(3)
(53
)
(52
)
(50
)
(1)
Certain trading-oriented businesses within Citi have accrual-accounted positions that are excluded from the estimated impact to net interest revenue in the table since these exposures are managed economically in combination with mark-to-market positions. The U.S. dollar interest rate exposure associated with these businesses was $(238) million for a 100 basis point instantaneous increase in interest rates as of September 30, 2016.
(2)
Includes the effect of changes in interest rates on AOCI related to investment securities, cash flow hedges and pension liability adjustments.
(3)
The estimated initial impact to the Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio considers the effect of Citi’s DTA position and is based on only the estimated initial AOCI impact above.
The slight sequential decrease in the estimated impact to net interest revenue primarily reflected changes in balance sheet composition, including changes in Citi Treasury’s interest rate derivative positioning, which was largely offset by the increase and seasoning of Citi’s deposit balances, primarily in treasury and trade solutions. The sequential increase in the estimated impact to AOCI primarily reflected the changes to the positioning of Citi Treasury’s interest rate derivatives portfolio, as referenced above.
In the event of an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100 basis point increase in interest rates, Citi expects the negative impact to AOCI would be offset in stockholders’ equity through the combination of expected incremental net interest revenue and the expected recovery of the impact on AOCI through accretion of Citi’s investment portfolio over a period
 
of time. As of September 30, 2016, Citi expects that the negative $4.9 billion impact to AOCI in such a scenario could potentially be offset over approximately 30 months.
The following table sets forth the estimated impact to Citi’s net interest revenue, AOCI and the Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (on a fully implemented basis) under four different changes in interest rate scenarios for the U.S. dollar and Citi’s other currencies. While Citi also monitors the impact of a parallel decrease in interest rates, a 100 basis point decrease in short-term interest rates is not meaningful, as it would imply negative interest rates in many of Citi's markets.



In millions of dollars (unless otherwise noted)
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Scenario 4
Overnight rate change (bps)
100

100



10-year rate change (bps)
100


100

(100
)
Estimated annualized impact to net interest revenue 
 
 
 
 
U.S. dollar
$
1,405

$
1,325

$
124

$
(167
)
All other currencies
574

561

34

(34
)
Total
$
1,979

$
1,886

$
158

$
(201
)
Estimated initial impact to AOCI (after-tax)(1)
$
(4,868
)
$
(3,035
)
$
(1,930
)
$
1,495

Estimated initial impact to Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (bps)(2)
(53
)
(33
)
(22
)
16

Note: Each scenario in the table above assumes that the rate change will occur instantaneously. Changes in interest rates for maturities between the overnight rate and the 10-year rate are interpolated.
(1)
Includes the effect of changes in interest rates on AOCI related to investment securities, cash flow hedges and pension liability adjustments.

75



(2)
The estimated initial impact to the Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio considers the effect of Citi’s deferred tax asset position and is based on only the estimated AOCI impact above.
As shown in the table above, the magnitude of the impact to Citi’s net interest revenue and AOCI is greater under scenario 2 as compared to scenario 3. This is because the combination of changes to Citi’s investment portfolio, partially offset by changes related to Citi’s pension liabilities, results in a net position that is more sensitive to rates at shorter and intermediate term maturities.
Over the past year, a number of central banks, including the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan and the Swiss National Bank, have implemented negative interest rates, and additional governmental entities could do so in the future. While negative interest rates can adversely impact net interest revenue (as well as net interest margin), Citi has, to date, been able to partially offset the impact of negative rates in these jurisdictions through a combination of business and Citi Treasury interest rate risk mitigation activities, including applying negative rates to client accounts (for additional information on Citi Treasury’s ongoing interest rate mitigation activities, see “Market Risk—Market Risk of Non-Trading Portfolios” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Reporting on Form 10-K).

Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates—Impacts on AOCI and Capital
As of September 30, 2016, Citi estimates that an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 5% appreciation of the U.S. dollar against all of the other currencies in which Citi has invested capital could reduce Citi’s tangible common equity (TCE) by approximately $1.6 billion, or 0.9% of TCE, as a result of changes to Citi’s foreign currency translation adjustment in AOCI, net of hedges. This impact would be primarily due to changes in the value of the Mexican peso, the Euro and the Japanese Yen.
 
This impact is also before any mitigating actions Citi may take, including ongoing management of its foreign currency translation exposure. Specifically, as currency movements change the value of Citi’s net investments in foreign-currency-denominated capital, these movements also change the value of Citi’s risk-weighted assets denominated in those currencies. This, coupled with Citi’s foreign currency hedging strategies, such as foreign currency borrowings, foreign currency forwards and other currency hedging instruments, lessens the impact of foreign currency movements on Citi’s Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio. Changes in these hedging strategies, as well as hedging costs, divestitures and tax impacts, can further impact the actual impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on Citi’s capital as compared to an unanticipated parallel shock, as described above.
The effect of Citi’s ongoing management strategies with respect to changes in foreign exchange rates and the impact of these changes on Citi’s TCE and Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio are shown in the table below. For additional information on the changes in AOCI, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.













 
For the quarter ended
In millions of dollars (unless otherwise noted)
Sept. 30, 2016
Jun. 30, 2016
Sept. 30, 2015
Change in FX spot rate(1)
(0.2
)%
(0.9
)%
(6.0
)%
Change in TCE due to FX translation, net of hedges
$
(412
)
$
(441
)
$
(2,010
)
As a percentage of TCE
(0.2
)%
(0.2
)%
(1.1
)%
Estimated impact to Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio (on a fully implemented basis) due
  to changes in FX translation, net of hedges (bps)
(2
)
2

(5
)

(1)
FX spot rate change is a weighted average based upon Citi’s quarterly average GAAP capital exposure to foreign countries.




76



Interest Revenue/Expense and Net Interest Margin
abs3q16png.jpg
 
3rd Qtr.
 
2nd Qtr.
 
3rd Qtr.
 
Change
In millions of dollars, except as otherwise noted
2016
 
2016
 
2015
 
3Q16 vs. 3Q15
Interest revenue(1)
$
14,767

 
$
14,473

 
$
14,832

 
 %
 
Interest expense
3,174

 
3,120

 
2,941

 
8

 
Net interest revenue(1)(2)
$
11,593

 
$
11,353

 
$
11,891

 
(3
)%
 
Interest revenue—average rate
3.65
%
 
3.65
%
 
3.67
%
 
(2
)
bps
Interest expense—average rate
1.03

 
1.04

 
0.93

 
10

bps
Net interest margin
2.86

 
2.86

 
2.94

 
(8
)
bps
Interest-rate benchmarks
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Two-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate
0.73
%
 
0.77
%
 
0.69
%
 
4

bps
10-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate
1.56

 
1.75

 
2.22

 
(66
)
bps
10-year vs. two-year spread
83

bps
98

bps
153

bps
 

 
Note: All interest expense amounts include FDIC deposit insurance assessments including, beginning in the third quarter of 2016, the previously disclosed surcharge of 4.5 basis points per annum. For additional information, see “Interest Revenue/Expense and Net Interest Margin” in Citi’s First Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q.
(1)
Net interest revenue includes the taxable equivalent adjustments related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $114 million, $117 million, and $118 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively.
(2)
Excludes expenses associated with certain hybrid financial instruments, which are classified as Long-term debt and accounted for at fair value.


Citi’s net interest margin (NIM) is calculated by dividing gross interest revenue less gross interest expense by average interest earning assets. Citi’s NIM was 2.86% in the third quarter of 2016, as the benefit from the impact of the Costco portfolio acquisition and other loan growth was offset by lower trading NIM, higher than anticipated cash balances during the quarter and the impact of higher FDIC deposit insurance assessments (see the Note to the table above).
 




77



Additional Interest Rate Details
Average Balances and Interest Rates—Assets(1)(2)(3)(4) 
Taxable Equivalent Basis
 
Average volume
Interest revenue
% Average rate
 
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
In millions of dollars, except rates
2016
2016
2015
2016
2016
2015
2016
2016
2015
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits with banks(5)
$
131,571

$
135,245

$
139,349

$
247

$
237

$
187

0.75
%
0.70
%
0.53
%
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)
 
 
 
 
 
 





In U.S. offices
$
146,581

$
148,511

$
150,455

$
387

$
362

$
313

1.05
%
0.98
%
0.83
%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)
88,415

84,018

83,376

249

302

343

1.12
%
1.45
%
1.63
%
Total
$
234,996

$
232,529

$
233,831

$
636

$
664

$
656

1.08
%
1.15
%
1.11
%
Trading account assets(7)(8)
 
 
 
 
 
 





In U.S. offices
$
109,039

$
108,602

$
114,360

$
912

$
970

$
1,024

3.33
%
3.59
%
3.55
%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)
100,825

101,075

95,827

559

603

507

2.21
%
2.40
%
2.10
%
Total
$
209,864

$
209,677

$
210,187

$
1,471

$
1,573

$
1,531

2.79
%
3.02
%
2.89
%
Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 





In U.S. offices
 
 
 
 
 
 





Taxable
$
228,337

$
225,279

$
211,722

$
990

$
991

$
941

1.72
%
1.77
%
1.76
%
Exempt from U.S. income tax
19,102

19,010

19,745

162

170

101

3.37
%
3.60
%
2.03
%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)
107,350

107,235

103,656

794

837

760

2.94
%
3.14
%
2.91
%
Total
$
354,789

$
351,524

$
335,123

$
1,946

$
1,998

$
1,802

2.18
%
2.29
%
2.13
%
Loans (net of unearned income)(9)
 
 
 
 
 
 





In U.S. offices
$
368,372

$
353,422

$
354,572

$
6,272

$
5,793

$
6,472

6.77
%
6.59
%
7.24
%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)
267,399

267,226

268,633

3,974

3,972

3,523

5.91
%
5.98
%
5.20
%
Total
$
635,771

$
620,648

$
623,205

$
10,246

$
9,765

$
9,995

6.41
%
6.33
%
6.36
%
Other interest-earning assets(10)
$
44,010

$
45,639

$
60,459

$
221

$
236

$
661

2.00
%
2.08
%
4.34
%
Total interest-earning assets
$
1,611,001

$
1,595,262

$
1,602,154

$
14,767

$
14,473

$
14,832

3.65
%
3.65
%
3.67
%
Non-interest-earning assets(7)
$
219,213

$
212,050

$
216,136

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
$
1,830,214

$
1,807,312

$
1,818,290

 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Net interest revenue includes the taxable equivalent adjustments related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $114 million, $117 million, and $118 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively.
(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset categories.
(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.
(4)
Detailed average volume, Interest revenue and Interest expense exclude Discontinued operations. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(5)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.
(6)
Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to ASC 210-20-45. However, Interest revenue excludes the impact of ASC 210-20-45.
(7)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative contracts are reported net, pursuant to ASC 815-10-45, in Non-interest-earning assets and Other non-interest-bearing liabilities.
(8)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.
(9)
Includes cash-basis loans.
(10)
Includes brokerage receivables.

78



Average Balances and Interest Rates—Liabilities and Equity, and Net Interest Revenue(1)(2)(3)(4) 
Taxable Equivalent Basis
 
Average volume
Interest expense
% Average rate
 
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
In millions of dollars, except rates
2016
2016
2015
2016
2016
2015
2016
2016
2015
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices(5)
$
296,999

$
286,653

$
271,141

$
470

$
371

$
311

0.63
%
0.52
%
0.46
%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)
434,232

435,242

425,741

973

935

904

0.89
%
0.86
%
0.84
%
Total
$
731,231

$
721,895

$
696,882

$
1,443

$
1,306

$
1,215

0.79
%
0.73
%
0.69
%
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)
 
 
 
 
 
 






In U.S. offices
$
99,924

$
103,517

$
111,629

$
267

$
260

$
177

1.06
%
1.01
%
0.63
%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)
58,060

57,685

62,616

192

267

202

1.32
%
1.86
%
1.28
%
Total
$
157,984

$
161,202

$
174,245

$
459

$
527

$
379

1.16
%
1.31
%
0.86
%
Trading account liabilities(8)(9)
 
 
 
 
 
 






In U.S. offices
$
33,600

$
27,420

$
24,673

$
65

$
64

$
29

0.77
%
0.94
%
0.47
%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)
42,637

45,960

45,797

37

32

28

0.35
%
0.28
%
0.24
%
Total
$
76,237

$
73,380

$
70,470

$
102

$
96

$
57

0.53
%
0.53
%
0.32
%
Short-term borrowings(10)
 
 
 
 
 
 






In U.S. offices
$
61,019

$
54,825

$
65,368

$
51

$
43

$
100

0.33
%
0.32
%
0.61
%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)
20,285

10,253

66,653

39

66

59

0.76
%
2.59
%
0.35
%
Total
$
81,304

$
65,078

$
132,021

$
90

$
109

$
159

0.44
%
0.67
%
0.48
%
Long-term debt(11)
 
 
 
 
 
 






In U.S. offices
$
175,427

$
175,506

$
179,575

$
1,028

$
1,009

$
1,080

2.33
%
2.31
%
2.39
%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)
6,506

6,714

8,061

52

73

51

3.18
%
4.37
%
2.51
%
Total
$
181,933

$
182,220

$
187,636

$
1,080

$
1,082

$
1,131

2.36
%
2.39
%
2.39
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
$
1,228,689

$
1,203,775

$
1,261,254

$
3,174

$
3,120

$
2,941

1.03
%
1.04
%
0.93
%
Demand deposits in U.S. offices
$
40,466

$
38,979

$
27,781

 
 
 
 
 
 
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8)
328,405

335,243

308,167

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total liabilities
$
1,597,560

$
1,577,997

$
1,597,202

 
 
 
 
 
 
Citigroup stockholders’ equity(12)
$
231,574

$
228,149

$
219,839

 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncontrolling interest
1,080

1,166

1,249

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total equity(12)
$
232,654

$
229,315

$
221,088

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
1,830,214

$
1,807,312

$
1,818,290

 
 
 
 
 
 
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(13)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
871,431

$
854,825

$
940,283

$
7,092

$
6,816

$
7,252

3.24
%
3.21
%
3.06
%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)
739,570

740,437

661,871

4,501

4,537

4,639

2.42

2.46

2.78

Total
$
1,611,001

$
1,595,262

$
1,602,154

$
11,593

$
11,353

$
11,891

2.86
%
2.86
%
2.94
%
(1)
Net interest revenue includes the taxable equivalent adjustments related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $114 million, $117 million, and $118 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively.
(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective liability categories.
(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.
(4)
Detailed average volume, Interest revenue and Interest expense exclude Discontinued operations. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(5)
Consists of other time deposits and savings deposits. Savings deposits are made up of insured money market accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The interest expense on savings deposits includes FDIC deposit insurance assessments.
(6)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.
(7)
Average volumes of securities sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to ASC 210-20-45. However, Interest expense excludes the impact of ASC 210-20-45.
(8)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative contracts are reported net, pursuant to ASC 815-10-45, in Non-interest-earning assets and Other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

79



(9)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.
(10)
Includes brokerage payables.
(11)
Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified as Long-term debt, as these obligations are accounted for in changes in fair value recorded in Principal transactions.
(12)
Includes stockholders’ equity from discontinued operations.
(13)
Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.

Average Balances and Interest Rates—Assets(1)(2)(3)(4) 
Taxable Equivalent Basis
 
Average volume
Interest revenue
% Average rate
 
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
In millions of dollars, except rates
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits with banks(5)
$
128,194

$
137,721

$
703

$
538

0.73
%
0.52
%
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
148,379

$
150,370

$
1,123

$
903

1.01
%
0.80
%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)
83,668

86,645

824

1,059

1.32
%
1.63
%
Total
$
232,047

$
237,015

$
1,947

$
1,962

1.12
%
1.11
%
Trading account assets(7)(8)
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
107,541

$
116,735

$
2,835

$
2,927

3.52
%
3.35
%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)
100,339

105,942

1,680

1,694

2.24
%
2.14
%
Total
$
207,880

$
222,677

$
4,515

$
4,621

2.90
%
2.77
%
Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
 
 
 
 
 
 
Taxable
$
227,532

$
213,107

$
2,981

$
2,854

1.75
%
1.79
%
Exempt from U.S. income tax
19,171

20,101

501

283

3.49
%
1.88
%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)
106,116

101,623

2,385

2,289

3.00
%
3.01
%
Total
$
352,819

$
334,831

$
5,867

$
5,426

2.22
%
2.17
%
Loans (net of unearned income)(9)
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
357,300

$
353,434

$
17,938

$
19,132

6.71
%
7.24
%
In offices outside the U.S.(5)
265,586

274,931

11,847

11,439

5.96
%
5.56
%
Total
$
622,886

$
628,365

$
29,785

$
30,571

6.39
%
6.50
%
Other interest-earning assets(10)
$
45,805

$
56,205

$
709

$
1,432

2.07
%
3.41
%
Total interest-earning assets
$
1,589,631

$
1,616,814

$
43,526

$
44,550

3.66
%
3.68
%
Non-interest-earning assets(7)
$
215,402

$
220,217

 

 

 

 

Total assets
$
1,805,033

$
1,837,031

 

 

 

 

(1)
Net interest revenue includes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $350 million and $363 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.
(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.
(4)
Detailed average volume, Interest revenue and Interest expense exclude Discontinued operations. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(5)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.
(6)
Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to FIN 41 (ASC 210-20-45). However, Interest revenue excludes the impact of FIN 41 (ASC 210-20-45).
(7)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative contracts are reported in Non-interest-earning assets and Other non-interest-bearing liabilities.
(8)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.
(9)
Includes cash-basis loans.
(10)
Includes brokerage receivables.


80



Average Balances and Interest Rates—Liabilities and Equity, and Net Interest Revenue(1)(2)(3)(4) 
Taxable Equivalent Basis
 
Average volume
Interest expense
% Average rate
 
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
Nine Months
In millions of dollars, except rates
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices(5)
$
287,100

$
274,111

$
1,157

$
997

0.54
%
0.49
%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)
431,176

424,641

2,796

2,831

0.87
%
0.89
%
Total
$
718,276

$
698,752

$
3,953

$
3,828

0.74
%
0.73
%
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
102,321

$
110,238

$
787

$
523

1.03
%
0.63
%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)
58,379

67,979

701

675

1.60
%
1.33
%
Total
$
160,700

$
178,217

$
1,488

$
1,198

1.24
%
0.90
%
Trading account liabilities(8)(9)
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
28,219

$
26,240

$
181

$
79

0.86
%
0.40
%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)
43,424

45,976

105

79

0.32
%
0.23
%
Total
$
71,643

$
72,216

$
286

$
158

0.53
%
0.29
%
Short-term borrowings(10)
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
57,559

$
67,708

$
123

$
194

0.29
%
0.38
%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)
17,727

57,438

177

242

1.33
%
0.56
%
Total
$
75,286

$
125,146

$
300

$
436

0.53
%
0.47
%
Long-term debt(11)
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
174,454

$
183,882

$
3,031

$
3,247

2.32
%
2.36
%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)
6,691

7,487

176

153

3.51
%
2.73
%
Total
$
181,145

$
191,369

$
3,207

$
3,400

2.36
%
2.38
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
$
1,207,050

$
1,265,700

$
9,234

$
9,020

1.02
%
0.95
%
Demand deposits in U.S. offices
$
36,927

$
25,490

 

 

 

 
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8)
331,906

327,998

 

 

 

 
Total liabilities
$
1,575,883

$
1,619,188

 

 

 

 
Citigroup stockholders’ equity(12)
$
228,014

$
216,498

 

 

 

 
Noncontrolling interest
1,136

1,345

 

 

 

 
Total equity(12)
$
229,150

$
217,843

 

 

 

 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
1,805,033

$
1,837,031

 

 

 

 
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
859,924

$
922,720

$
20,894

$
21,342

3.25
%
3.09
%
In offices outside the U.S.(6)
729,707

694,094

13,398

14,188

2.45
%
2.73
%
Total
$
1,589,631

$
1,616,814

$
34,292

$
35,530

2.88
%
2.94
%
(1)
Net interest revenue includes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $350 million and $363 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.
(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.
(4)
Detailed average volume, Interest revenue and Interest expense exclude Discontinued operations. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(5)
Consists of other time deposits and savings deposits. Savings deposits are made up of insured money market accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The interest expense on savings deposits includes FDIC deposit insurance fees and charges.
(6)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.
(7)
Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to FIN 41 (ASC 210-20-45). However, Interest expense excludes the impact of FIN 41 (ASC 210-20-45).
(8)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative contracts are reported in Non-interest-earning assets and Other non-interest-bearing liabilities.
(9)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.
(10)
Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified as Long-term debt, as these obligations are accounted for in changes in fair value recorded in Principal transactions.
(11)
Includes stockholders' equity from discontinued operations.
(12)
Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.

81



Analysis of Changes in Interest Revenue(1)(2)(3) 
 
3rd Qtr. 2016 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2016
3rd Qtr. 2016 vs. 3rd Qtr. 2015
 
Increase (decrease)
due to change in:
Increase (decrease)
due to change in:
In millions of dollars
Average
volume
Average
rate
Net
change
Average
volume
Average
rate
Net
change
Deposits with banks(4)
$
(7
)
$
17

$
10

$
(11
)
$
71

$
60

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or
  purchased under agreements to resell
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
(5
)
$
30

$
25

$
(8
)
$
82

$
74

In offices outside the U.S.(4)
15

(68
)
(53
)
20

(114
)
(94
)
Total
$
10

$
(38
)
$
(28
)
$
12

$
(32
)
$
(20
)
Trading account assets(5)
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
4

$
(62
)
$
(58
)
$
(46
)
$
(66
)
$
(112
)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)
(1
)
(43
)
(44
)
27

25

52

Total
$
3

$
(105
)
$
(102
)
$
(19
)
$
(41
)
$
(60
)
Investments(1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
15

$
(24
)
$
(9
)
$
74

$
36

$
110

In offices outside the U.S.(4)
1

(44
)
(43
)
27

7

34

Total
$
16

$
(68
)
$
(52
)
$
101

$
43

$
144

Loans (net of unearned income)(6)
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
250

$
229

$
479

$
246

$
(446
)
$
(200
)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)
3

(1
)
2

(16
)
467

451

Total
$
253

$
228

$
481

$
230

$
21

$
251

Other interest-earning assets(7)
$
(8
)
$
(7
)
$
(15
)
$
(147
)
$
(293
)
$
(440
)
Total interest revenue
$
267

$
27

$
294

$
166

$
(231
)
$
(65
)
(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is included in this presentation.
(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.
(3)
Detailed average volume, Interest revenue and Interest expense exclude Discontinued operations. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.
(5)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.
(6)
Includes cash-basis loans.
(7)
Includes brokerage receivables.

82



Analysis of Changes in Interest Expense and Net Interest Revenue(1)(2)(3) 
 
3rd Qtr. 2016 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2016
3rd Qtr. 2016 vs. 3rd Qtr. 2015
 
Increase (decrease)
due to change in:
Increase (decrease)
due to change in:
In millions of dollars
Average
volume
Average
rate
Net
change
Average
volume
Average
rate
Net
change
Deposits
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
14

$
85

$
99

$
32

$
127

$
159

In offices outside the U.S.(4)
(2
)
40

38

18

51

69

Total
$
12

$
125

$
137

$
50

$
178

$
228

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
(9
)
$
16

$
7

$
(20
)
$
110

$
90

In offices outside the U.S.(4)
2

(77
)
(75
)
(15
)
5

(10
)
Total
$
(7
)
$
(61
)
$
(68
)
$
(35
)
$
115

$
80

Trading account liabilities(5)
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
13

$
(12
)
$
1

$
13

$
23

$
36

In offices outside the U.S.(4)
(2
)
7

5

(2
)
11

9

Total
$
11

$
(5
)
$
6

$
11

$
34

$
45

Short-term borrowings(6)
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
5

$
3

$
8

$
(6
)
$
(43
)
$
(49
)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)
38

(65
)
(27
)
(59
)
39

(20
)
Total
$
43

$
(62
)
$
(19
)
$
(65
)
$
(4
)
$
(69
)
Long-term debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$

$
19

$
19

$
(25
)
$
(27
)
$
(52
)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)
(2
)
(19
)
(21
)
(11
)
12

1

Total
$
(2
)
$

$
(2
)
$
(36
)
$
(15
)
$
(51
)
Total interest expense
$
55

$
(1
)
$
54

$
(75
)
$
308

$
233

Net interest revenue
$
212

$
28

$
240

$
241

$
(539
)
$
(298
)
(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is related to the tax-exempt bond portfolio based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is included in this presentation.
(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.
(3)
Detailed average volume, Interest revenue and Interest expense exclude Discontinued operations. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.
(5)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest on Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.
(6)
Includes brokerage payables.


83



Analysis of Changes in Interest Revenue, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Revenue(1)(2)(3) 
 
Nine Months 2016 vs. Nine Months 2015
 
Increase (decrease)
due to change in:
In millions of dollars
Average
volume
Average
rate
Net
change(2)
Deposits at interest with banks(4)
$
(39
)
$
204

$
165

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
(12
)
$
232

$
220

In offices outside the U.S.(4)
(35
)
(200
)
(235
)
Total
$
(47
)
$
32

$
(15
)
Trading account assets(5)
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
(238
)
$
146

$
(92
)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)
(92
)
78

(14
)
Total
$
(330
)
$
224

$
(106
)
Investments(1)
 
 

In U.S. offices
$
186

$
159

$
345

In offices outside the U.S.(4)
101

(5
)
96

Total
$
287

$
154

$
441

Loans (net of unearned income)(6)
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
207

$
(1,401
)
$
(1,194
)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)
(398
)
806

408

Total
$
(191
)
$
(595
)
$
(786
)
Other interest-earning assets
$
(232
)
$
(491
)
$
(723
)
Total interest revenue
$
(552
)
$
(472
)
$
(1,024
)
Deposits (7)
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
49

$
111

$
160

In offices outside the U.S.(4)
43

(78
)
(35
)
Total
$
92

$
33

$
125

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
(40
)
$
304

$
264

In offices outside the U.S.(4)
(103
)
129

26

Total
$
(143
)
$
433

$
290

Trading account liabilities(5)
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
6

$
96

$
102

In offices outside the U.S.(4)
(5
)
31

26

Total
$
1

$
127

$
128

Short-term borrowings
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
(26
)
$
(45
)
$
(71
)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)
(244
)
179

(65
)
Total
$
(270
)
$
134

$
(136
)
Long-term debt
 
 
 
In U.S. offices
$
(164
)
$
(52
)
$
(216
)
In offices outside the U.S.(4)
(18
)
41

23

Total
$
(182
)
$
(11
)
$
(193
)
Total interest expense
$
(502
)
$
716

$
214

Net interest revenue
$
(50
)
$
(1,188
)
$
(1,238
)
(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is included in this presentation.
(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.
(3)
Detailed average volume, Interest revenue and Interest expense exclude Discontinued operations.
(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.
(5)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in Trading account assets and Trading account liabilities, respectively.
(6)
Includes cash-basis loans.
(7)
The interest expense on deposits includes the FDIC assessment and deposit insurance fees and charges of $838 million and $849 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

84


Market Risk of Trading Portfolios
For additional information on Citi’s market risk of trading portfolios, see “Market Risk—Market Risk of Trading Portfolios” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Value at Risk
As of September 30, 2016, Citi estimates that the conservative features of its VAR calibration contribute an approximate 22% add-on (compared to 16% at June 30, 2016) to what would be a VAR estimated under the assumption of stable and perfectly normal distributed markets.
 

As set forth in the table below, Citi's average trading VAR as of September 30, 2016 was materially unchanged from the prior quarter. While average foreign exchange risk was higher in the third quarter of 2016 from currency volatility following the U.K.’s vote to exit the European Union in June 2016, the impact on the total trading VAR was muted due to diversification benefits from the overall portfolio. Average trading and credit portfolio VAR as of September 30, 2016 decreased slightly, mainly from lower spread volatilities affecting the credit portfolio.





 
 
Third Quarter
 
Second Quarter
 
Third Quarter
In millions of dollars
September 30, 2016
2016 Average
June 30, 2016
2016 Average
September 30, 2015
2015 Average
Interest rate
$
30

$
34

$
32

$
32

$
59

$
40

Credit spread
73

62

61

60

64

$
67

Covariance adjustment(1)
(28
)
(31
)
(30
)
(26
)
(28
)
(22
)
Fully diversified interest rate and credit spread
$
75

$
65

$
63

$
66

$
95

$
85

Foreign exchange
16

26

26

20

43

36

Equity
9

12

11

15

18

17

Commodity
22

23

23

20

17

17

Covariance adjustment(1)
(53
)
(62
)
(59
)
(56
)
(62
)
(61
)
Total trading VAR—all market risk factors, including general and specific risk (excluding credit portfolios)(2)
$
69

$
64

$
64

$
65

$
111

$
94

Specific risk-only component(3)
$
7

$
6

$
9

$
9

$
6

$
5

Total trading VAR—general market risk factors only (excluding credit portfolios)(2)
$
62

$
58

$
55

$
56

$
105

$
89

Incremental impact of the credit portfolio(4)
$
21

$
21

$
22

$
23

$
29

$
22

Total trading and credit portfolio VAR
$
90

$
85

$
86

$
88

$
140

$
116


(1)
Covariance adjustment (also known as diversification benefit) equals the difference between the total VAR and the sum of the VARs tied to each individual risk type. The benefit reflects the fact that the risks within each and across risk types are not perfectly correlated and, consequently, the total VAR on a given day will be lower than the sum of the VARs relating to each individual risk type. The determination of the primary drivers of changes to the covariance adjustment is made by an examination of the impact of both model parameter and position changes.    
(2) The total Trading VAR includes mark-to-market and certain fair value option trading positions in ICG and Citi Holdings, with the exception of hedges to the loan portfolio, fair value option loans and all CVA exposures. Available-for-sale and accrual exposures are not included.
(3)
The specific risk-only component represents the level of equity and fixed income issuer-specific risk embedded in VAR.
(4)
The credit portfolio is composed of mark-to-market positions associated with non-trading business units including Citi Treasury, the CVA relating to derivative counterparties and all associated CVA hedges. FVA and DVA are not included. The credit portfolio also includes hedges to the loan portfolio, fair value option loans and hedges to the leveraged finance pipeline within capital markets origination in ICG.

 

85


The table below provides the range of market factor VARs associated with Citi’s total trading VAR, inclusive of specific risk:
 
Third Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
 
2016
2016
2015
In millions of dollars
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Interest rate
$
27

$
47

$
26

$
40

$
30

$
59

Credit spread
55

73

56

64

61

73

Fully diversified interest rate and credit spread
$
59

$
75

$
60

$
74

$
72

$
99

Foreign exchange
15

46

14

29

22

54

Equity
6

22

10

26

11

35

Commodity
19

31

16

25

12

22

Total trading
$
53

$
72

$
55

$
76

$
78

$
111

Total trading and credit portfolio
72

97

79

98

95

140

Note: No covariance adjustment can be inferred from the above table as the high and low for each market factor will be from different close of business dates.

The following table provides the VAR for ICG, excluding the CVA relating to derivative counterparties, hedges of CVA, fair value option loans and hedges to the loan portfolio:
In millions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2016
Total—all market risk factors, including general and specific risk
$
67

Average—during quarter
$
63

High—during quarter
76

Low—during quarter
51


Regulatory VAR Back-testing
In accordance with Basel III, Citi is required to perform back-testing to evaluate the effectiveness of its Regulatory VAR model. Regulatory VAR back-testing is the process in which the daily one-day VAR, at a 99% confidence interval, is compared to the buy-and-hold profit and loss (i.e., the profit and loss impact if the portfolio is held constant at the end of the day and re-priced the following day). Buy-and-hold profit and loss represents the daily mark-to-market
 
profit and loss attributable to price movements in covered positions from the close of the previous business day. Buy-and-hold profit and loss excludes realized trading revenue, net interest, fees and commissions, intra-day trading profit and loss, and changes in reserves.
Based on a 99% confidence level, Citi would expect two to three days in any one year where buy-and-hold losses exceeded the Regulatory VAR. Given the conservative calibration of Citi’s VAR model (as a result of taking the greater of short- and long-term volatilities and fat-tail scaling of volatilities), Citi would expect fewer exceptions under normal and stable market conditions. Periods of unstable market conditions could increase the number of back-testing exceptions.
As of September 30, 2016, there was one back-testing exception observed for Citi’s Regulatory VAR for the prior 12 months. Trading losses on June 3, 2016 exceeded the VAR estimate at the Citigroup level, driven by higher volatility in the interest rate and foreign exchange markets following the release of weak non-farm payroll data.








86



COUNTRY RISK

For additional information on country risk at Citi, see “Country Risk” and “Risk Factors” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Top 25 Country Exposures
The following table presents Citi’s top 25 exposures by
country (excluding the U.S.) as of September 30, 2016. For
purposes of the table, loan amounts are reflected in the country
where the loan is booked, which is generally based on the
domicile of the borrower. For example, a loan to a Chinese
subsidiary of a Switzerland-based corporation will generally
be categorized as a loan in China. In addition, Citi has
developed regional booking centers in certain countries, most
significantly in the United Kingdom (U.K.) and Ireland, in
 
order to more efficiently serve its corporate customers. As an
example, with respect to the U.K., only 25% of corporate
loans presented in the table below are to U.K. domiciled
entities (23% for unfunded commitments), with the balance of
the loans predominately to European domiciled counterparties.
Approximately 84% of the total U.K. funded loans and 88% of
the total U.K. unfunded commitments were investment grade
as of September 30, 2016. Trading account assets and investment securities are generally categorized based on the domicile of the issuer of the security of the underlying reference entity. For additional information on the assets included in the table, see the footnotes to the table below.
For a discussion of uncertainties arising from the results of the U.K. referendum to leave the European Union, see “Country Risk” in Citi’s Second Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q.


 
In billions of dollars
ICG
loans(1)
GCB loans(2)
Other funded(3)
Unfunded(4)
Net MTM on Derivatives/Repos(5)
Total hedges (on loans and CVA)
Investment securities(6)
Trading account assets(7)
Total
as of
3Q16
Total
as of
2Q16
Total
as of
4Q15
United Kingdom
$
33.0

$

$
3.0

$
56.2

$
13.0

$
(2.9
)
$
10.8

$
(0.9
)
$
112.2

$
108.4

$
110.4

Mexico
7.6

23.9

0.4

5.3

0.8

(0.7
)
15.1

3.7

56.1

57.0

60.4

Korea
2.7

20.1

0.4

4.2

1.8

(0.8
)
8.9

1.8

39.1

37.2

39.3

Singapore
12.2

13.0


5.2

0.7

(0.3
)
6.1

1.2

38.1

37.3

36.7

Hong Kong
12.0

10.3

0.7

5.0

0.5

(0.7
)
5.9

1.5

35.2

35.3

35.2

Brazil
14.4

1.9

0.3

3.9

5.2

(2.8
)
4.3

4.1

31.3

28.6

23.2

India
9.7

6.5

0.7

5.0

0.5

(1.4
)
7.8

1.8

30.6

31.0

33.0

Australia
4.6

10.2

0.1

5.1

1.4

(1.0
)
4.5

(0.5
)
24.4

22.6

24.5

Ireland
7.5


0.6

15.2

0.3



0.6

24.2

24.1

22.0

Germany
0.2



4.0

4.3

(3.6
)
11.0

2.8

18.7

17.3

18.8

Japan
2.6


0.3

6.9

3.5

(1.3
)
3.6

2.0

17.6

15.6

9.1

Canada
2.2

0.6

2.3

6.5

2.2

(0.9
)
3.9

0.2

17.0

18.1

16.5

China
6.6

4.4

0.2

1.5

0.7

(0.8
)
2.8

0.8

16.2

22.4

23.0

Taiwan
3.8

8.2

0.1

1.0

0.3

(0.3
)
1.2

1.6

15.9

15.4

14.8

Poland
3.0

1.7


3.3

0.1

(0.3
)
4.0

0.3

12.1

12.2

13.1

Malaysia
1.8

4.7

0.2

1.8

0.2

(0.2
)
0.6

1.4

10.5

11.3

9.2

Netherlands




1.7

(0.9
)
5.6

0.3

6.7

7.1

7.1

Italy
0.3



2.6

7.8

(6.1
)
0.2

1.9

6.7

4.6

6.6

Thailand
0.8

1.9


1.1

0.1


1.6

0.8

6.3

6.5

5.4

United Arab
  Emirates
3.2

1.4

0.1

1.6

0.5

(0.4
)

(0.2
)
6.2

6.4

6.4

Luxembourg


0.1


0.8

(0.2
)
5.2

0.1

6.0

5.7

4.9

Colombia
2.4

1.8


1.0

0.2

(0.1
)
0.3


5.6

5.1

5.7

Indonesia
1.8

1.1

0.1

1.1

0.1

(0.1
)
1.0

0.5

5.6

5.2

4.4

Russia
2.3

0.9


0.9

0.1

(0.4
)
0.5

0.3

4.6

4.8

5.0

Turkey
3.1


0.5

0.5

0.2

(0.1
)
0.2

(0.1
)
4.3

4.6

4.0


(1)
ICG loans reflect funded corporate loans and private bank loans, net of unearned income. As of September 30, 2016, private bank loans in the table above totaled $17.4 billion, concentrated in the U.K. ($4.6 billion), Singapore ($6.6 billion) and Hong Kong ($5.1 billion).                    
(2)
GCB loans include funded loans in Brazil and Colombia related to businesses that were transferred to Citi Holdings as of January 1, 2016.    
(3)
Other funded includes other direct exposure such as accounts receivable, loans held-for-sale, other loans in Citi Holdings and investments accounted for under the equity method.                                        
(4)
Unfunded exposure includes unfunded corporate lending commitments, letters of credit and other contingencies.            

87



(5)
Net mark-to-market (MTM) on derivatives and securities lending / borrowing transactions (repos). Exposures are shown net of collateral and inclusive of CVA. Includes margin loans.                                        
(6)
Investment securities include securities available-for-sale, recorded at fair market value, and securities held-to-maturity, recorded at historical cost.                                        
(7)
Trading account assets are shown on a net basis and include derivative exposure where the underlying reference entity is located in that country.    
 

Venezuela
For historical information on foreign exchange controls in Venezuela as well as additional information on Citi’s exposures and discontinuation of certain businesses in Venezuela, see “Country Risk-Venezuela” in each of Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, First Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q and Second Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q.
As of September 30, 2016, Citi’s net investment in its Venezuelan operations was approximately $55 million (compared to $54 million as of June 30, 2016), with de minimis foreign exchange exposure remaining. Citi also had cumulative translation losses related to its investment in Venezuela of approximately $20 million, which would not be reclassified into earnings unless a change of control, liquidation or similar event to Citi’s Venezuela operations were to occur. If any such event were to occur, Citi estimates its net exposure to Venezuela could be approximately $70 million as of September 30, 2016, although the actual amount could fluctuate slightly depending upon the facts and circumstances of such event.


 





88



INCOME TAXES

Deferred Tax Assets
For additional information on Citi’s deferred tax assets (DTAs), see “Risk Factors—Operational Risks,” “Significant Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates—Income Taxes” and Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
At September 30, 2016, Citigroup had recorded net DTAs of approximately $45.4 billion, unchanged from June 30, 2016, as the continued generation of U.S. taxable earnings in the current quarter was offset by losses in AOCI.
The following table summarizes Citi’s net DTAs balance as of the periods presented. Of Citi’s net DTAs as of September 30, 2016, those arising from net operating losses, foreign tax credit and general business credit carry-forwards are 100% deducted in calculating Citi’s regulatory capital, while DTAs arising from temporary differences are deducted from regulatory capital if in excess of the 10%/15% limitations (see “Capital Resources” above). Approximately $17.6 billion of the net DTA was not deducted in calculating regulatory capital pursuant to full Basel III implementation standards as of September 30, 2016.
Jurisdiction/Component
DTAs balance
In billions of dollars
Sept 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
Total U.S.
$
43.2

$
45.2

Total foreign
2.2

2.6

Total
$
45.4

$
47.8



Effective Tax Rate
Citi’s effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2016 was 30.8%, slightly higher than the 30.2% effective tax rate in the third quarter of 2015 (excluding CVA/DVA).





89



DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Citi’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, including without limitation that information required to be disclosed by Citi in its SEC filings is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Citi’s Disclosure Committee assists the CEO and CFO in their responsibilities to design, establish, maintain and evaluate the effectiveness of Citi’s disclosure controls and procedures. The Disclosure Committee is responsible for, among other things, the oversight, maintenance and implementation of the disclosure controls and procedures, subject to the supervision and oversight of the CEO and CFO.
Citi’s management, with the participation of its CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of Citigroup’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of September 30, 2016 and, based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that at that date Citigroup’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO SECTION 219 OF THE IRAN THREAT REDUCTION AND SYRIA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

Pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, which added Section 13(r) to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, Citi is required to disclose in its annual or quarterly reports, as applicable, whether it or any of its affiliates knowingly engaged in certain activities, transactions or dealings relating to Iran or with individuals or entities that are subject to sanctions under U.S. law. Disclosure is generally required even where the activities, transactions or dealings were conducted in compliance with applicable law. Citi did not have any reportable activities to disclose in the first quarter of 2016 but disclosed reportable activities pursuant to Section 219 in the second quarter of 2016 in the Second Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q.
In addition to Citi’s prior disclosures, Citi processed three funds transfers involving three different Iranian Embassies during the third quarter of 2016.  In two of these transfers, Citibank, London acted as an intermediary bank to process a domestic Irish payment from an individual to the Iranian Embassy in Ireland and payment from a hotel in Iceland for a cancellation refund for the Iranian Embassy in Norway.  The value of these funds transfers was EUR 75 (approximately $82) and EUR 418 (approximately $457) respectively, for a total of EUR 493 (approximately $539).  In addition, Bank Handlowy w Warszawie S.A., a subsidiary of Citi, acted as a remitting bank for a payment related to a visa fee for the Iranian Embassy in Poland.  The value of this funds transfer was EUR 130 (approximately $142).  All three of these funds transfers were for transactions ordinarily incident to travel
 
which are exempt under Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations.  The total value for all of these funds transfers was EUR 623 (approximately $681) and resulted in nominal revenue for Citibank and Bank Handlowy w Warszawie S.A.





90



FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this Form 10-Q, including but not limited to statements included within the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In addition, Citigroup also may make forward-looking statements in its other documents filed or furnished with the SEC, and its management may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others.
Generally, forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but instead represent Citigroup’s and its management’s beliefs regarding future events. Such statements may be identified by words such as believe, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, may increase, may fluctuate, and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as will, should, would and could.
Such statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Actual results and capital and other financial conditions may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors, including without limitation: (i) the precautionary statements included within each individual business’ discussion and analysis of its results of operations above and in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K, First Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q and Second Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q; (ii) the factors listed and described under “Risk Factors” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K; and (iii) the risks and uncertainties summarized below:

changes to the calculation of risk-weighted assets proposed or adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and/or the U.S. banking agencies, such as those related to credit risk, market risk (including as a result of the so-called “fundamental review of the trading book”) and operational risk, and the potential impact any such changes could have on Citi’s regulatory capital ratios;
the potential impact of any changes to the CCAR stress testing requirements or process, such as the inclusion of Citi’s GSIB surcharge in the Federal Reserve Board’s CCAR post-stress minimum capital requirements or the introduction of additional macroprudential considerations (such as funding and liquidity shocks) in the stress testing process;
the potential incorporation of a variable “stress capital buffer” as part of Citi’s ongoing regulatory capital requirements;
Citi’s ability to adequately address the shortcomings identified by the Federal Reserve Board and FDIC as a result of their review of Citi’s 2015 annual resolution plan submission;
 
the ongoing regulatory changes and uncertainties faced by financial institutions, including Citi, in the U.S. and globally, including regulatory changes relating to debt collection practices within Citi’s North America cards businesses, and the potential impact these changes and uncertainties could have on Citi’s businesses, results of operations, financial condition, strategy or organizational structure and compliance risks and costs;
the potential impact to Citi’s delinquency rates, loan loss reserves, net credit losses and overall results of operations as Citi’s revolving home equity lines of credit continue to “reset” (Revolving HELOCs), particularly if interest rates increase;
the potential impact to Citi’s businesses, credit costs and overall results of operations and financial condition as a result of macroeconomic and geopolitical challenges and uncertainties, including those relating to the outcome of the U.S. elections or if energy or other commodity prices deteriorate;
the extensive uncertainties arising as a result of the vote in the United Kingdom to withdraw from the European Union, including the timing and terms of the withdrawal, and the potential impact to macroeconomic conditions as well as Citi’s legal entity structure and overall results of operations or financial condition;
the various risks faced by Citi as a result of its significant presence in the emerging markets, including among others sociopolitical instability, nationalization or loss of licenses, business restrictions, sanctions or asset freezes, closure of branches or subsidiaries, confiscation of assets and foreign exchange controls as well as the increased compliance and regulatory risks and costs;
the potential impact of concentrations of risk, such as market risk arising from Citi’s volume of transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, could have on Citi’s hedging strategies and results of operations;
the uncertainties and potential operational difficulties to Citi and its liquidity planning arising from the Federal Reserve Board’s total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) proposal, including uncertainties relating to any potential “grandfathering” of outstanding long-term debt and the potential impact on Citi’s estimated liquidity needs;
the potential impacts on Citi’s liquidity and/or costs of funding as a result of external factors, including among others market disruptions and governmental fiscal and monetary policies as well as regulatory changes, such as the TLAC proposal;
the impact of ratings downgrades of Citi or one or more of its more significant subsidiaries or issuing entities on Citi’s funding and liquidity as well as the results of operations of certain of its businesses;
the potential negative impact to Citi’s co-branding and private label credit card relationships or Citi’s results of operations or financial condition due to, among other things, operational difficulties of a particular retailer or merchant or early termination of a particular relationship;


91



the potential impact to Citi from an increasing risk of continually evolving cybersecurity or other technological and similar risks, including fraud, theft, loss, misuse or disclosure of confidential client, customer, corporate or network information or assets, damage to Citi’s reputation, additional costs (including credit costs) to Citi, regulatory penalties, legal exposure and financial losses;
Citi’s ability to continue to utilize its DTAs (including the foreign tax credit component of its DTAs) and thus reduce the negative impact of the DTAs on Citi’s regulatory capital, including as a result of movements in Citi’s AOCI;
the potential impact to Citi if its interpretation or application of the extensive tax laws to which it is subject, such as withholding tax obligations or business valuations, differs from those of the relevant governmental authorities;
the impact on the value of Citi’s DTAs and its results of operations if corporate tax rates in the U.S. or certain state, local or foreign jurisdictions decline, or if other changes are made to the U.S. tax system;
the potential impact to Citi’s results of operations and/or regulatory capital and capital ratios if Citi’s risk models, including its Basel III risk-weighted asset models, are ineffective, require modification or enhancement or approval is withdrawn by Citi’s U.S. banking regulators;
Citi’s ability to manage its overall level of expenses while at the same time continuing to successfully invest in identified areas of its businesses or operations;
Citi’s ability to continue to wind-down Citi Holdings, and thus reduce the negative impact on Citi’s regulatory capital, as well as maintain Citi Holdings at “break even” during 2016;
the potential impact on Citi’s performance, including its competitive position and ability to effectively manage its businesses and continue to execute its strategy, if Citi is unable to hire and retain highly qualified employees for any reason;
the impact of ongoing changes to financial accounting and reporting standards or interpretations, such as the FASB’s credit impairment standard, on how Citi records and reports its financial condition and results of operations as well as the potential impact of incorrect assumptions or estimates in Citi’s financial statements;
the heightened compliance requirements and risks to which Citi is subject, including reputational and legal risks, as well as the impact of increased compliance costs on Citi’s expense management and investments initiatives;
legal, regulatory and reputational risks arising from the heightened scrutiny of “conduct risk” or perceived deficiencies in the culture of financial institutions, including Citi, that are viewed as harmful to clients, counterparties, investors or the markets, such as improperly creating, selling, marketing or managing products and services or improper incentive compensation programs with respect thereto; and
 
the potential outcomes of the extensive legal and regulatory proceedings, investigations and other inquiries to which Citi is or may be subject at any given time, particularly given the increased severity of the remedies sought and potential collateral consequences to Citi arising from such outcomes.

Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of Citigroup speak only as to the date they are made, and Citi does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statements were made.

















































92



























This page intentionally left blank.

93



FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited)—
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income(Unaudited)—For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Balance Sheet—September 30, 2016 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2015
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity(Unaudited)—For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)—
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
 
Note 1—Basis of Presentation and Accounting Changes
Note 2—Discontinued Operations and Significant Disposals
Note 3—Business Segments
Note 4—Interest Revenue and Expense
Note 5—Commissions and Fees
Note 6—Principal Transactions
Note 7—Incentive Plans
Note 8—Retirement Benefits
Note 9—Earnings per Share
Note 10—Federal Funds, Securities Borrowed, Loaned and
Subject to Repurchase Agreements
Note 11—Brokerage Receivables and Brokerage Payables
Note 12—Investments
 


 
 
Note 13—Loans
Note 14—Allowance for Credit Losses
Note 15—Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Note 16—Debt
Note 17—Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Note 18—Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities
Note 19—Derivatives Activities
Note 20—Fair Value Measurement
Note 21—Fair Value Elections
Note 22—Guarantees and Commitments
Note 23—Contingencies
Note 24—Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements




94



CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
 
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts
2016
2015
2016
2015
Revenues
 
 
 

 

Interest revenue
$
14,653

$
14,714

$
43,176

$
44,187

Interest expense
3,174

2,941

9,234

9,020

Net interest revenue
$
11,479

$
11,773

$
33,942

$
35,167

Commissions and fees
$
2,644

$
2,732

$
7,832

$
9,096

Principal transactions
2,238

1,327

5,894

5,471

Administration and other fiduciary fees
862

870

2,551

2,827

Realized gains on sales of investments, net
287

151

673

641

Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments
 
 
 

 

Gross impairment losses
(32
)
(80
)
(615
)
(195
)
Less: Impairments recognized in AOCI




Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
$
(32
)
$
(80
)
$
(615
)
$
(195
)
Insurance premiums
$
184

$
464

$
665

$
1,443

Other revenue
98

1,455

1,921

3,448

Total non-interest revenues
$
6,281

$
6,919

$
18,921

$
22,731

Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
17,760

$
18,692

$
52,863

$
57,898

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
 
 
 

 

Provision for loan losses
$
1,746

$
1,582

$
5,022

$
4,852

Policyholder benefits and claims
35

189

172

567

Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments
(45
)
65

(4
)
(20
)
Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$
1,736

$
1,836

$
5,190

$
5,399

Operating expenses
 
 
 

 

Compensation and benefits
$
5,203

$
5,321

$
15,988

$
16,324

Premises and equipment
624

722

1,917

2,168

Technology/communication
1,694

1,628

5,000

4,884

Advertising and marketing
403

391

1,226

1,176

Other operating
2,480

2,607

7,165

7,929

Total operating expenses
$
10,404

$
10,669

$
31,296

$
32,481

Income from continuing operations before income taxes
$
5,620

$
6,187

$
16,377

$
20,018

Provision for income taxes
1,733

1,881

4,935

6,037

Income from continuing operations
$
3,887

$
4,306

$
11,442

$
13,981

Discontinued operations
 
 
 

 

Loss from discontinued operations
$
(37
)
$
(15
)
$
(76
)
$
(14
)
Benefit for income taxes
(7
)
(5
)
(21
)
(5
)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
$
(30
)
$
(10
)
$
(55
)
$
(9
)
Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
3,857

$
4,296

$
11,387

$
13,972

Noncontrolling interests
17

5

48

65

Citigroup’s net income
$
3,840

$
4,291

$
11,339

$
13,907

Basic earnings per share(1)
 
 
 

 

Income from continuing operations
$
1.25

$
1.36

$
3.60

$
4.39

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
(0.01
)

(0.02
)

Net income
$
1.24

$
1.36

$
3.58

$
4.38

Weighted average common shares outstanding
2,879.9

2,993.3

2,912.9

3,015.8


95



Diluted earnings per share(1)
 
 
 

 

Income from continuing operations
$
1.25

$
1.36

$
3.60

$
4.38

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
(0.01
)

(0.02
)

Net income
$
1.24

$
1.35

$
3.58

$
4.38

Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding
2,880.1

2,996.9

2,913.0

3,020.4

(1) Due to rounding, earnings per share on continuing operations and discontinued operations may not sum to earnings per share on net income.
The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
3,857

$
4,296

$
11,387

$
13,972

Add: Citigroup’s other comprehensive income (loss)


  





Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of taxes
$
(432
)
$
511

$
2,529

$
167

Net change in debt valuation adjustment (DVA), net of taxes (1)
(200
)

5


Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes
(83
)
189

385

367

Benefit plans liability adjustment, net of taxes
12

(360
)
(480
)
128

Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes and hedges
(375
)
(2,493
)
(273
)
(4,703
)
Citigroup’s total other comprehensive income (loss)
$
(1,078
)
$
(2,153
)
$
2,166

$
(4,041
)
Total comprehensive income before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
2,779

$
2,143

$
13,553

$
9,931

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
17

5

48

65

Citigroup’s comprehensive income
$
2,762

$
2,138

$
13,505

$
9,866

(1)
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.

The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.


96



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
 
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
 
September 30,
 
 
2016
December 31,
In millions of dollars
(Unaudited)
2015
Assets
 

 

Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits)
$
23,419

$
20,900

Deposits with banks
132,571

112,197

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (including $143,618 and $137,964 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, at fair value)
236,045

219,675

Brokerage receivables
36,112

27,683

Trading account assets (including $97,370 and $92,123 pledged to creditors at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)
263,352

249,956

Investments:
 
 
  Available for sale (including $8,413 and $10,698 pledged to creditors as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)
308,117

299,136

Held to maturity (including $1,216 and $3,630 pledged to creditors as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)
38,588

36,215

Non-marketable equity securities (including $1,977 and $2,088 at fair value as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)
8,235

7,604

Total investments
$
354,940

$
342,955

Loans:
 

 

Consumer (including $31 and $34 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, at fair value)
328,702

325,785

Corporate (including $3,939 and $4,971 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, at fair value)
309,733

291,832

Loans, net of unearned income
$
638,435

$
617,617

Allowance for loan losses
(12,439
)
(12,626
)
Total loans, net
$
625,996

$
604,991

Goodwill
22,539

22,349

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)
5,358

3,721

Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)
1,270

1,781

Other assets (including $6,460 and $6,121 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, at fair value)
116,515

125,002

Total assets
$
1,818,117

$
1,731,210


The following table presents certain assets of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs), which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The assets in the table below include those assets that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs, presented on the following page, and are in excess of those obligations. Additionally, the assets in the table below include third-party assets of consolidated VIEs only and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation.
 
September 30,
 
 
2016
December 31,
In millions of dollars
(Unaudited)
2015
Assets of consolidated VIEs to be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs
 

 

Cash and due from banks
$
262

$
153

Trading account assets
585

583

Investments
5,057

5,263

Loans, net of unearned income
 

 

Consumer
52,837

58,772

Corporate
20,849

22,008

Loans, net of unearned income
$
73,686

$
80,780

Allowance for loan losses
(1,800
)
(2,135
)
Total loans, net
$
71,886

$
78,645

Other assets
166

150

Total assets of consolidated VIEs to be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs
$
77,956

$
84,794

Statement continues on the next page.

97



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET                             Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
(Continued)
 
September 30,
 
 
2016
December 31,
In millions of dollars, except shares and per share amounts
(Unaudited)
2015
Liabilities
 

 

Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices
$
141,899

$
139,249

Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices (including $479 and $923 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, at fair value)
288,094

280,234

Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S.
75,956

71,577

Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. (including $941 and $667 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, at fair value)
434,303

416,827

Total deposits
$
940,252

$
907,887

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (including $42,939 and $36,843 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, at fair value)
153,124

146,496

Brokerage payables
61,921

53,722

Trading account liabilities
131,649

117,512

Short-term borrowings (including $2,599 and $1,207 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, at fair value)
29,527

21,079

Long-term debt (including $27,535 and $25,293 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, at fair value)
209,051

201,275

Other liabilities (including $2,369 and $1,624 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, at fair value)
59,903

60,147

Total liabilities
$
1,585,427

$
1,508,118

Stockholders’ equity
 

 

Preferred stock ($1.00 par value; authorized shares: 30 million), issued shares: 770,120 as of  September 30, 2016 and 668,720 as of December 31, 2015, at aggregate liquidation value
$
19,253

$
16,718

Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized shares: 6 billion), issued shares: 3,099,482,042 as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015
31

31

Additional paid-in capital
107,875

108,288

Retained earnings
143,678

133,841

Treasury stock, at cost: September 30, 2016—249,751,794 shares and December 31, 2015—146,203,311 shares
(12,069
)
(7,677
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(27,193
)
(29,344
)
Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity
$
231,575

$
221,857

Noncontrolling interest
1,115

1,235

Total equity
$
232,690

$
223,092

Total liabilities and equity
$
1,818,117

$
1,731,210


The following table presents certain liabilities of consolidated VIEs, which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The liabilities in the table below include third-party liabilities of consolidated VIEs only and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. The liabilities also exclude amounts where creditors or beneficial interest holders have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup.
 
September 30,
 
 
2016
December 31,
In millions of dollars
(Unaudited)
2015
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders
  do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup
 

 

Short-term borrowings
$
11,205

$
11,965

Long-term debt
24,780

31,273

Other liabilities
1,433

2,099

Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest
  holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup
$
37,418

$
45,337

The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

98



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands
2016
2015
Preferred stock at aggregate liquidation value
 

 

Balance, beginning of period
$
16,718

$
10,468

Issuance of new preferred stock
2,535

4,750

Balance, end of period
$
19,253

$
15,218

Common stock and additional paid-in capital
 

 

Balance, beginning of period
$
108,319

$
108,010

Employee benefit plans
(371
)
325

Preferred stock issuance expense
(37
)
(19
)
Other
(5
)
(24
)
Balance, end of period
$
107,906

$
108,292

Retained earnings
 

 

Balance, beginning of period
$
133,841

$
118,201

Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)(2)
15

(349
)
Adjusted balance, beginning of period
$
133,856

$
117,852

Citigroup’s net income
11,339

13,907

Common dividends(3)
(760
)
(334
)
Preferred dividends
(757
)
(504
)
Tax benefit


Balance, end of period
$
143,678

$
130,921

Treasury stock, at cost
 

 

Balance, beginning of period
$
(7,677
)
$
(2,929
)
Employee benefit plans(4)
775

405

Treasury stock acquired(5)
(5,167
)
(3,802
)
Balance, end of period
$
(12,069
)
$
(6,326
)
Citigroup’s accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
 

 

Balance, beginning of period
$
(29,344
)
$
(23,216
)
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)
(15
)

Adjusted balance, beginning of period
$
(29,359
)
$
(23,216
)
Net change in Citigroup’s Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
2,166

(4,041
)
Balance, end of period
$
(27,193
)
$
(27,257
)
Total Citigroup common stockholders’ equity
$
212,322

$
205,630

Total Citigroup stockholders’ equity
$
231,575

$
220,848

Noncontrolling interests
 

 

Balance, beginning of period
$
1,235

$
1,511

Transactions between noncontrolling-interest shareholders and the related consolidated subsidiary
(11
)

Transactions between Citigroup and the noncontrolling-interest shareholders
(69
)
(144
)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling-interest shareholders
48

65

Dividends paid to noncontrolling-interest shareholders
(42
)
(78
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to
   noncontrolling-interest shareholders
(13
)
(67
)
Other
(33
)
2

Net change in noncontrolling interests
$
(120
)
$
(222
)
Balance, end of period
$
1,115

$
1,289

Total equity
$
232,690

$
222,137


(1)
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
(2)
Citi adopted ASU 2014-01 Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Affordable Housing, in the first quarter of 2015 on a retrospective basis. This adjustment to opening Retained earnings represents the impact to periods prior to January 1, 2013 and is shown as an adjustment to the opening balance since 2015 is the earliest period presented in this statement. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 for additional information.

99



(3)
Common dividends declared were $0.05 per share in the first and second quarters and $0.16 per share in the third quarter of 2016 and $0.01 per share in the first quarter and $0.05 per share in the second and third quarters of 2015.
(4)
Includes treasury stock related to (i) certain activity on employee stock option program exercises where the employee delivers existing shares to cover the option exercise, or (ii) under Citi’s employee restricted or deferred stock programs where shares are withheld to satisfy tax requirements.
(5)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, primarily consists of open market purchases under Citi’s Board of Directors-approved common stock repurchase program.

The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

100



CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
 
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations
 

 

Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
11,387

$
13,972

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
48

65

Citigroup’s net income
$
11,339

$
13,907

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
(55
)
(9
)
Income from continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests
$
11,394

$
13,916

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations
 

 

Gains on significant disposals(1)
(422
)

Depreciation and amortization
2,714

2,632

Provision for loan losses
5,022

4,852

Realized gains from sales of investments
(673
)
(641
)
Net impairment losses on investments, goodwill and intangible assets
616

231

Change in trading account assets
(13,396
)
29,840

Change in trading account liabilities
14,137

(13,055
)
Change in brokerage receivables net of brokerage payables
(230
)
(2,079
)
Change in loans held-for-sale (HFS)
3,958

(814
)
Change in other assets
(2,009
)
1,037

Change in other liabilities
1,398

1,999

Other, net
5,825

3,446

Total adjustments
$
16,940

$
27,448

Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations
$
28,334

$
41,364

Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
 

 

   Change in deposits with banks
$
(20,374
)
$
(10,250
)
   Change in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
(16,370
)
10,875

   Change in loans
(42,163
)
(7,158
)
   Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans
12,676

8,127

   Purchases of investments
(155,804
)
(195,421
)
   Proceeds from sales of investments(2)
99,172

113,953

   Proceeds from maturities of investments
52,607

64,850

   Proceeds from significant disposals(1)
265


   Capital expenditures on premises and equipment and capitalized software
(2,092
)
(2,472
)
   Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates,
      and repossessed assets
467

471

Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations
$
(71,616
)
$
(17,025
)
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
 

 

   Dividends paid
$
(1,517
)
$
(838
)
   Issuance of preferred stock
2,498

4,731

   Treasury stock acquired
(5,167
)
(3,800
)
   Stock tendered for payment of withholding taxes
(313
)
(425
)
   Change in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
6,628

(4,834
)
   Issuance of long-term debt
43,464

35,678

   Payments and redemptions of long-term debt
(40,461
)
(33,637
)
   Change in deposits
32,365

4,911

   Change in short-term borrowings
8,448

(35,756
)

101



Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations
$
45,945

$
(33,970
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
$
(144
)
$
(751
)
Change in cash and due from banks
$
2,519

$
(10,382
)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period
20,900

32,108

Cash and due from banks at end of period
$
23,419

$
21,726

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations
 

 

Cash paid during the period for income taxes
$
2,855

$
4,043

Cash paid during the period for interest
9,760

8,441

Non-cash investing activities
 

 

Decrease in net loans associated with significant disposals reclassified to HFS

(9,063
)
Decrease in investments associated with significant disposals reclassified to HFS

(1,402
)
Decrease in goodwill associated with significant disposals reclassified to HFS

(216
)
Decrease in deposits with banks with significant disposals reclassified to HFS

(404
)
Transfers to loans HFS from loans
7,900

17,900

Transfers to OREO and other repossessed assets
138

225

Non-cash financing activities
 
 
Decrease in long-term debt associated with significant disposals reclassified to HFS
$

$
(6,179
)

(1)    See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on significant disposals.
(2)    Proceeds for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 includes approximately $3.3 billion from the sale of Citi’s investment in China Guangfa Bank.

The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.



102



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING CHANGES

Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2016 and for the three- and nine- month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 include the accounts of Citigroup Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation have been reflected. The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Citigroup’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, including the historical audited consolidated financial statements of Citigroup reflecting the certain realignments and reclassifications set forth in Citigroup’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 17, 2016 (2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K), and Citigroup’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 (First Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q) and June 30, 2016 (Second Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q).
Certain financial information that is normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), but is not required for interim reporting purposes, has been condensed or omitted.
Management must make estimates and assumptions that affect the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related footnote disclosures. While management uses its best judgment, actual results could differ from those estimates. Current market conditions increase the risk and complexity of the judgments in these estimates.
As noted above, the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited.
Throughout these Notes, “Citigroup,” “Citi” and the “Company” refer to Citigroup Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods’ financial statements and notes to conform to the current period’s presentation.

ACCOUNTING CHANGES

Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments.
This ASU requires entities to present separately in OCI the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability
 
resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. It will also require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income, thus eliminating eligibility for the current available-for-sale category. However, Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock as well as exchange seats will continue to be presented at cost.
Citi early-adopted only the provisions of this ASU related to presentation of the change in fair value of liabilities for which the fair value option was elected related to changes in Citigroup’s own credit spreads in OCI effective January 1, 2016. Accordingly, beginning in the first quarter 2016, these amounts of are reflected as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI), whereas, these amounts were previously recognized in Citigroup’s revenues and net income. The impact of adopting this amendment resulted in a cumulative catch-up reclassification from retained earnings to AOCI of an accumulated after tax loss of approximately $15 million at January 1, 2016. Financial statements for periods prior to 2016 were not subject to restatement under the provisions of this ASU. For additional information, see Note 17, Note 20 and Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company is evaluating the effect that the other provisions of ASU 2016-01 will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Income Tax Impact of Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes - Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which will require an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. The ASU is effective on January 1, 2018 with early adoption permitted.  The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-16 will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounting for Financial Instruments-Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326). The ASU introduces a new accounting model, the Current Expected Credit Losses model (CECL), which requires earlier recognition of credit losses, while also providing additional transparency about credit risk.
The FASB’s CECL model utilizes a lifetime “expected credit loss” measurement objective for the recognition of credit losses for loans, held-to-maturity securities and other receivables at the time the financial asset is originated or acquired. The expected credit losses are adjusted each period for changes in expected lifetime credit losses. For


103



available-for-sale securities where fair value is less than cost, credit-related impairment, if any, will be recognized in an allowance for credit losses and adjusted each period for changes in expected credit risk. This model replaces the multiple existing impairment models in current GAAP, which generally require that a loss be incurred before it is recognized.
The CECL model represents a significant departure from existing GAAP, and may result in material changes to the Company’s accounting for financial instruments. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-13 will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures. The ASU will be effective for Citi as of January 1, 2020. Early application is permitted for annual periods beginning January 1, 2019.

Revenue Recognition
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective on January 1, 2018. The ASU is not applicable to financial instruments and, therefore, is not expected to impact a majority of the Company’s revenue, including net interest income. The Company plans to adopt the new revenue recognition guidance in the first quarter of 2018. The Company does not expect a material change in timing of revenue recognition and is evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on the presentation of its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures and its adoption method.

Lease Accounting
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which is intended to increase transparency and comparability of accounting for lease transactions. The ASU will require lessees to recognize all leases on the balance sheet as lease assets and lease liabilities and will require both quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding key information about leasing arrangements. Lessor accounting is largely unchanged. The guidance is effective beginning January 1, 2019 with an option to early adopt. The Company is evaluating whether to early adopt and the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements, regulatory capital and related disclosures.


104



2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT DISPOSALS

Discontinued Operations
The following sales are reported as Discontinued operations within the Corporate/Other segment.

Sale of Brazil Credicard Business
Citi sold its non-Citibank-branded cards and consumer finance business in Brazil (Credicard) in 2013. Residual costs and resolution of certain contingencies from the disposal resulted in income from Discontinued operations, net of taxes, of $0 million and $0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $0 million and $6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Sale of Egg Banking plc Credit Card Business
Citi sold the Egg Banking plc credit card business in 2011. Residual costs from the disposal resulted in losses from Discontinued operations, net of taxes, of $24 million and $10 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $46 million and $16 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Combined Results for Discontinued Operations
The following is summarized financial information for previous Discontinued operations for which Citi continues to have minimal residual costs associated with the sales:
 
Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Total revenues, net of interest expense(1)
$

$

$

$

Income (loss) from discontinued operations
$
(37
)
$
(15
)
$
(76
)
$
(14
)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(7
)
(5
)
(21
)
(5
)
Income (loss), from discontinued operations, net of taxes
$
(30
)
$
(10
)
$
(55
)
$
(9
)

(1) Total revenues include gain or loss on sale, if applicable.

Cash flows for the Discontinued operations were not material for all periods presented.

 

Significant Disposals
The following sales completed during 2016 and 2015 were identified as significant disposals. The major classes of assets and liabilities derecognized from the Consolidated Balance Sheet at closing and the income related to each business until the disposal date are presented below.
Novation of the 80% Primerica Coinsurance Agreement
During the first quarter of 2016, Citi completed a novation (an arrangement that extinguishes Citi’s rights and obligations under a contract) of the Primerica 80% Coinsurance Agreement to a third-party re-insurer, resulting in revenue of $422 million recorded in Other revenue ($274 million after tax) during the first quarter of 2016. Furthermore, the novation resulted in derecognition of $1.5 billion of available for-sale securities and cash, $0.95 billion of deferred acquisition costs and $2.7 billion of insurance liabilities.
Income before taxes, excluding the revenue upon novation, was as follows:

Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Income before taxes
$

$
33

$

$
103


Sale of OneMain Financial Business
During the fourth quarter of 2015, Citi sold OneMain Financial (OneMain), which was reported in Citi Holdings, including 1,100 retail branches, 5,500 employees, and approximately 1.3 million customer accounts. OneMain had approximately $10.2 billion of assets, including $7.8 billion of loans (net of allowance), and $1.4 billion of available-for-sale securities. OneMain also had $8.4 billion of liabilities, including $6.2 billion of long-term debt and $1.1 billion of short-term borrowings. The transaction generated a pretax gain on sale of $2.6 billion, recorded in Other revenue ($1.6 billion after-tax) during the fourth quarter of 2015. However, when combined with the loss on redemption of certain long-term debt supporting remaining Citi Holdings’ assets during the fourth quarter of 2015, the resulting net after-tax gain was $0.8 billion.
Income before taxes was as follows:

Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Income before taxes
$

$
216

$

$
570











105



3. BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Citigroup’s activities are conducted through the Global Consumer Banking (GCB), Institutional Clients Group (ICG), Corporate/Other and Citi Holdings business segments.
For additional information regarding Citigroup’s business segments, including certain reclassifications effective January 1, 2016, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following tables present information regarding the Company’s continuing operations by segment:

 
Revenues,
net of interest expense
(1)
Provision (benefits)
for income taxes
Income (loss) from
continuing operations
(2)
Identifiable assets
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
 
In millions of dollars, except identifiable assets in billions
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
Global Consumer Banking
$
8,227

$
8,134

$
690

$
932

$
1,288

$
1,691

$
412

$
381

Institutional Clients Group
8,628

8,659

1,266

1,198

2,772

2,433

1,302

1,217

Corporate/Other
28

218

(183
)
(314
)
(247
)
183

43

52

Total Citicorp
$
16,883

$
17,011

$
1,773

$
1,816

$
3,813

$
4,307

$
1,757

$
1,650

Citi Holdings
877

1,681

(40
)
65

74

(1
)
61

81

Total
$
17,760

$
18,692

$
1,733

$
1,881

$
3,887

$
4,306

$
1,818

$
1,731

 
Revenues,
net of interest expense
(1)
Provision (benefits)
for income taxes
Income (loss) from
continuing operations
(2)
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
Global Consumer Banking
$
23,730

$
24,620

$
2,017

$
2,660

$
3,842

$
5,014

Institutional Clients Group
25,510

26,682

3,373

3,894

7,446

8,267

Corporate/Other
428

801

(530
)
(871
)
(365
)
395

Total Citicorp
$
49,668

$
52,103

$
4,860

$
5,683

$
10,923

$
13,676

Citi Holdings
3,195

5,795

75

354

519

305

Total
$
52,863

$
57,898

$
4,935

$
6,037

$
11,442

$
13,981

(1)
Includes Citicorp (excluding Corporate/Other) total revenues, net of interest expense, in North America of $8.5 billion and $8.3 billion; in EMEA of $2.6 billion and $2.4 billion; in Latin America of $2.3 billion and $2.6 billion; and in Asia of $3.5 billion and $3.5 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Regional numbers exclude Citi Holdings and Corporate/Other, which largely operate within the U.S. Includes Citicorp (excluding Corporate/Other) total revenues, net of interest expense, in North America of $24.5 billion and $25.1 billion; in EMEA of $7.4 billion and $7.9 billion; in Latin America of $6.8 billion and $7.5 billion; and in Asia of $10.5 billion and $10.8 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
(2)
Includes pretax provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims in the GCB results of $1.8 billion and $1.3 billion; in the ICG results of $(90) million and $313 million; and in Citi Holdings results of $0.0 billion and $0.2 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Includes pretax provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims in the GCB results of $4.7 billion and $4.1 billion; in the ICG results of $382 million and $312 million; and in Citi Holdings results of $0.1 billion and $1.0 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

106



4.  INTEREST REVENUE AND EXPENSE
Interest revenue and Interest expense consisted of the following:
 
Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Interest revenue
 
 
 
 
Loan interest, including fees
$
10,229

$
9,985

$
29,739

$
30,544

Deposits with banks
247

187

703

538

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
636

656

1,947

1,962

Investments, including dividends
1,887

1,727

5,679

5,194

Trading account assets(1)
1,433

1,498

4,399

4,517

Other interest(2)
221

661

709

1,432

Total interest revenue
$
14,653

$
14,714

$
43,176

$
44,187

Interest expense
 
 
 
 
Deposits(3)
$
1,443

$
1,215

$
3,953

$
3,828

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
459

379

1,488

1,198

Trading account liabilities(1)
102

57

286

158

Short-term borrowings
90

159

300

436

Long-term debt
1,080

1,131

3,207

3,400

Total interest expense
$
3,174

$
2,941

$
9,234

$
9,020

Net interest revenue
$
11,479

$
11,773

$
33,942

$
35,167

Provision for loan losses
1,746

1,582

5,022

4,852

Net interest revenue after provision for loan losses
$
9,733

$
10,191

$
28,920

$
30,315

(1)
Interest expense on Trading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of interest revenue from Trading account assets.
(2)
During 2015, interest earned related to assets of significant disposals (primarily OneMain Financial) were reclassified into Other interest.
(3)
Includes deposit insurance fees and charges of $336 million and $264 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $838 million and $849 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.




107



5.  COMMISSIONS AND FEES

The primary components of Citi’s Commissions and fees revenue are investment banking fees, trading-related fees, fees related to trade and securities services in ICG and credit card and bank card fees. For additional information regarding
 
certain components of Commissions and fees revenue, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following table presents Commissions and fees revenue:

 
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Investment banking
$
726

$
692

$
2,053

$
2,590

Trading-related
519

566

1,664

1,816

Trade and securities services
384

428

1,176

1,311

Credit cards and bank cards
372

415

987

1,413

Corporate finance(1)
164

113

528

384

Other consumer(2)
173

160

497

522

Checking-related
140

128

360

374

Loan servicing
71

103

235

317

Other
95

127

332

369

Total commissions and fees
$
2,644

$
2,732

$
7,832

$
9,096

(1)
Consists primarily of fees earned from structuring and underwriting loan syndications.
(2)
Primarily consists of fees for investment fund administration and management, third-party collections, commercial demand deposit accounts and certain credit card services.

6. PRINCIPAL TRANSACTIONS
Citi’s Principal transactions revenue consists of realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading activities. For additional information regarding Principal transactions revenue, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
 
in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following table presents Principal transactions revenue:

 
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Global Consumer Banking
$
163

$
144

$
473

$
444

Institutional Clients Group
2,063

1,209

5,548

5,199

Corporate/Other
(37
)
(26
)
(183
)
(265
)
Subtotal Citicorp
$
2,189

$
1,327

$
5,838

$
5,378

Citi Holdings
49


56

93

Total Citigroup
$
2,238

$
1,327

$
5,894

$
5,471

Interest rate risks(1)
$
1,282

$
907

$
3,229

$
3,497

Foreign exchange risks(2)
466

432

1,481

1,236

Equity risks(3)
81

(183
)
76

(254
)
Commodity and other risks(4)
171

180

436

614

Credit products and risks(5)
238

(9
)
672

378

Total
$
2,238

$
1,327

$
5,894

$
5,471

(1)
Includes revenues from government securities and corporate debt, municipal securities, mortgage securities and other debt instruments. Also includes spot and forward trading of currencies and exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) currency options, options on fixed income securities, interest rate swaps, currency swaps, swap options, caps and floors, financial futures, OTC options and forward contracts on fixed income securities.
(2)
Includes revenues from foreign exchange spot, forward, option and swap contracts, as well as foreign currency translation (FX translation) gains and losses.
(3)
Includes revenues from common, preferred and convertible preferred stock, convertible corporate debt, equity-linked notes and exchange-traded and OTC equity options and warrants.
(4)
Primarily includes revenues from crude oil, refined oil products, natural gas and other commodities trades.
(5)
Includes revenues from structured credit products.

108



7. INCENTIVE PLANS
 
For additional information on Citi’s incentive plans, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


8. RETIREMENT BENEFITS

For additional information on Citi’s retirement benefits, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Net (Benefit) Expense
The following tables summarize the components of net (benefit) expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the Company’s pension and postretirement plans, for Significant Plans and All Other Plans:
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Pension plans
 
Postretirement benefit plans
 
U.S. plans
 
Non-U.S. plans
 
U.S. plans
 
Non-U.S. plans
In millions of dollars
2016
2015

2016
2015

2016
2015

2016
2015
Qualified plans
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

Benefits earned during the period
$
1

$
1

 
$
39

$
42

 
$

$

 
$
1

$
3

Interest cost on benefit obligation
126

143

 
70

77

 
6

8

 
24

25

Expected return on plan assets
(224
)
(223
)
 
(71
)
(81
)
 
(2
)

 
(22
)
(25
)
Amortization of unrecognized
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

Prior service benefit


 


 


 
(1
)
(3
)
Net actuarial loss
43

31

 
19

17

 


 
8

10

Curtailment loss(1)
10

2

 


 


 


Settlement (gain)(1)


 
(2
)

 


 


Net qualified plans (benefit) expense
$
(44
)
$
(46
)

$
55

$
55

 
$
4

$
8

 
$
10

$
10

Nonqualified plans expense
12

11

 


 


 


Total net (benefit) expense
$
(32
)
$
(35
)
 
$
55

$
55

 
$
4

$
8

 
$
10

$
10


 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
Pension plans
 
Postretirement benefit plans
 
U.S. plans
 
Non-U.S. plans
 
U.S. plans
 
Non-U.S. plans
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
 
2016
2015
 
2016
2015
 
2016
2015
Qualified plans
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

Benefits earned during the period
$
2

$
3

 
$
116

$
129

 
$

$

 
$
7

$
10

Interest cost on benefit obligation
399

411

 
216

237

 
19

24

 
72

82

Expected return on plan assets
(660
)
(668
)
 
(217
)
(248
)
 
(7
)

 
(65
)
(81
)
Amortization of unrecognized




 
 

 

 
 
 

 
 

 

Prior service benefit

(2
)
 
(1
)

 


 
(7
)
(9
)
Net actuarial loss (gain)
118

106

 
58

56

 
(1
)

 
24

33

Curtailment loss (gain) (1)
10

12

 
(3
)

 


 


Settlement loss(1)


 
2


 


 


Net qualified plans (benefit) expense
$
(131
)
$
(138
)
 
$
171

$
174

 
$
11

$
24

 
$
31

$
35

Nonqualified plans expense
31

33

 


 


 


Total net (benefit) expense
$
(100
)
$
(105
)
 
$
171

$
174

 
$
11

$
24

 
$
31

$
35


(1) Losses and gains due to curtailment and settlement relate to repositioning and divestiture activities.

109



Funded Status and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI)
The following tables summarize the funded status and amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the Company’s Significant Plans:
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2016
 
Pension plans
 
Postretirement benefit plans
In millions of dollars
U.S. plans
 
Non-U.S. plans
 
U.S. plans
 
Non-U.S. plans
Change in projected benefit obligation (PBO)
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
$
13,943

 
$
6,534

 
$
817

 
$
1,291

Plans measured annually

 
(1,819
)
 

 
(282
)
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year—Significant Plans
$
13,943

 
$
4,715

 
$
817

 
$
1,009

First quarter activity
574

 
199

 
22

 
30

Second quarter activity
395

 
94

 
(106
)
 
(32
)
Projected benefit obligation at June 30, 2016—Significant Plans
$
14,912

 
$
5,008

 
$
733

 
$
1,007

Benefits earned during the period
1

 
25

 

 
2

Interest cost on benefit obligation
132

 
57

 
6

 
20

Actuarial loss (gain)
76

 
354

 
(2
)
 
(6
)
Benefits paid, net of participants’ contributions
(191
)
 
(76
)
 
(8
)
 
(12
)
Curtailment loss(1)
10

 

 

 

Foreign exchange impact and other
(123
)
 
(104
)
 

 
(47
)
Projected benefit obligation at period end—Significant Plans
$
14,817

 
$
5,264


$
729

 
$
964


(1) Losses due to curtailment relate to repositioning activities.

110



 
Nine months ended September 30, 2016
 
Pension plans
 
Postretirement benefit plans
In millions of dollars
U.S. plans
 
Non-U.S. plans
 
U.S. plans
 
Non-U.S. plans
Change in plan assets
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year
$
12,137

 
$
6,104

 
$
166

 
$
1,133

Plans measured annually

 
(1,175
)
 

 
(8
)
Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year—Significant Plans
$
12,137

 
$
4,929

 
$
166

 
$
1,125

First quarter activity
(72
)
 
233

 
$

 
39

Second quarter activity
190

 
101

 
$
(21
)
 
(56
)
Plan assets at fair value at June 30, 2016Significant Plans
$
12,255

 
$
5,263

 
$
145

 
$
1,108

Actual return on plan assets
235

 
370

 
8

 
61

Company contributions, net of reimbursements
513

 
12

 
(7
)
 

Plan participants’ contributions

 
1

 

 

Benefits paid, net of government subsidy
(191
)
 
(76
)
 
(8
)
 
(12
)
Foreign exchange impact and other
(125
)
 
(157
)
 

 
(53
)
Plan assets at fair value at period end—Significant Plans
$
12,687

 
$
5,413

 
$
138

 
$
1,104

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Funded status of the Significant plans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Qualified plans(1)
$
(1,387
)
 
$
150

 
$
(591
)
 
$
140

Nonqualified plans
(743
)
 

 

 

Funded status of the plans at period end—Significant Plans
$
(2,130
)
 
$
150

 
$
(591
)
 
$
140

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net amount recognized
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Benefit asset
$

 
$
728

 
$

 
$
140

Benefit liability
(2,130
)
 
(578
)
 
(591
)
 

Net amount recognized on the balance sheet—Significant Plans
$
(2,130
)
 
$
150

 
$
(591
)
 
$
140

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amounts recognized in AOCI
 
 

 
 

 
 

Prior service benefit

 
38

 

 
93

Net actuarial gain (loss)
(7,341
)
 
(991
)
 
70

 
(383
)
Net amount recognized in equity (pretax)—Significant Plans
$
(7,341
)
 
$
(953
)
 
$
70

 
$
(290
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated benefit obligation at period end—Significant Plans
$
14,810

 
$
4,935

 
$
729

 
$
964

(1)
The U.S. qualified pension plan is fully funded under specified Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), funding rules as of January 1, 2016 and no minimum required funding is expected for 2016.

The following table shows the change in AOCI related to the Company’s Significant Plans and All Other Plans:
In millions of dollars
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Beginning of period balance, net of tax(1)(2)
$
(5,608
)
 
$
(5,116
)
Actuarial assumptions changes and plan experience
(415
)
 
(1,962
)
Net asset gain due to difference between actual and expected returns
367

 
1,038

Net amortization
64

 
179

Prior service cost

 
33

Curtailment/settlement gain(3)
(2
)
 
(2
)
Foreign exchange impact and other
(3
)
 
(33
)
Change in deferred taxes, net
1

 
267

Change, net of tax
$
12

 
$
(480
)
End of period balance, net of tax(1)(2)
$
(5,596
)
 
$
(5,596
)
(1)
See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of net AOCI balance.
(2)
Includes net-of-tax amounts for certain profit sharing plans outside the U.S.
(3)
Gains due to curtailment and settlement relate to repositioning and divestiture activities.

111



Plan Assumptions
The discount rates utilized during the period in determining the pension and postretirement net (benefit) expense for the Significant Plans are as follows:
Net benefit (expense) assumed discount rates during the period
Three Months Ended
Sept. 30, 2016
Jun. 30, 2016
U.S. plans
 
 
Qualified pension
3.65%
3.95%
Nonqualified pension
3.55
3.90
Postretirement
3.40
3.75
Non-U.S. plans
 
 
Pension
0.20 - 11.85
0.35 to 12.30
Weighted average
4.80
5.14
Postretirement
8.20
8.45

The discount rates utilized at period-end in determining the pension and postretirement benefit obligations for the Significant Plans are as follows:
Plan obligations assumed discount rates at period ended
Sept. 30, 2016
Jun. 30, 2016
Mar. 31,
2016
U.S. plans
 
 
Qualified pension
3.55%
3.65%
3.95%
Nonqualified pension
3.45
3.55
3.90
Postretirement
3.30
3.40
3.75
Non-U.S. plans
 
 
 
Pension
0.20-11.55
0.20-11.85
0.35 to 12.30
Weighted average
4.42
4.80
5.14
Postretirement
8.25
8.20
8.45
    
Sensitivities of Certain Key Assumptions
The following table summarizes the estimated effect on the Company’s Significant Plans quarterly expense of a
one-percentage-point change in the discount rate:
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
One-percentage-point increase
One-percentage-point decrease
Pension
 
 
   U.S. plans
$
9

$
(13
)
   Non-U.S. plans
(6
)
6

Postretirement
 
 
   U.S. plans
$

$
(1
)
   Non-U.S. plans
(2
)
2










 




112



Contributions
For the U.S. pension plans, there were no required minimum cash contributions during the first nine months of 2016. The Company made a discretionary contribution of $500 million to the U.S. qualified defined benefit plan during the third quarter of 2016.
 
The following table summarizes the Company’s actual contributions for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, as well as estimated expected Company contributions for the remainder of 2016 and the actual contributions made in the fourth quarter of 2015:



 
Pension plans 
 
Postretirement plans 
 
U.S. plans (1)
 
Non-U.S. plans
 
U.S. plans
 
Non-U.S. plans
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
 
2016
2015
 
2016
2015
 
2016
2015
Company contributions(2) for the nine months ended September 30
$
541

$
33

 
$
48

$
85

 
$
4

$
217

 
$
4

$
7

Company contributions made or expected to be made during the remainder of the year
12

19

 
29

49

 

18

 
3

2


(1)
The U.S. pension plans include benefits paid directly by the Company for the nonqualified pension plans.
(2)
Company contributions are composed of cash contributions made to the plans and benefits paid directly by the Company.

Defined Contribution Plans
The following table summarizes the Company’s contributions for the defined contribution plans:
.
 
Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
   U.S. plans
$
88

$
94

$
281

$
295

   Non-U.S. plans
67

67

207

212


Postemployment Plans
The following table summarizes the components of net expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the Company’s U.S. postemployment plans:

 
Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Service related expense

 
 
 
 
Interest cost on benefit obligation

$

$
1

$
2

$
3

Amortization of unrecognized
 
 
 
 
     Prior service benefit
(7
)
(8
)
(23
)
(23
)
     Net actuarial loss
1

3

3

9

Total service-related benefit
$
(6
)
$
(4
)
$
(18
)
$
(11
)
Non-service-related expense
$
10

$
9

$
23

$
15

Total net expense
$
4

$
5

$
5

$
4

 











113



9.     EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table reconciles the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) computations:
 
Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions, except per-share amounts
2016
2015
2016
2015
Income from continuing operations before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
3,887

$
4,306

$
11,442

$
13,981

Less: Noncontrolling interests from continuing operations
17

5

48

65

Net income from continuing operations (for EPS purposes)
$
3,870

$
4,301

$
11,394

$
13,916

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes
(30
)
(10
)
(55
)
(9
)
Citigroup's net income
$
3,840

$
4,291

$
11,339

$
13,907

Less: Preferred dividends(1)
225

174

757

504

Net income available to common shareholders
$
3,615

$
4,117

$
10,582

$
13,403

Less: Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to employee restricted and deferred shares with nonforfeitable rights to dividends, applicable to basic EPS
53

56

145

182

Net income allocated to common shareholders for basic EPS
$
3,562

$
4,061

$
10,437

$
13,221

Net income allocated to common shareholders for diluted EPS
$
3,562

$
4,061

$
10,437

$
13,221

Weighted-average common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS
2,879.9

2,993.3

2,912.9

3,015.8

Effect of dilutive securities(2)
 
 
 

 
Options(3)
0.1

3.4

0.1

4.4

Other employee plans
0.1

0.2

0.1

0.2

Adjusted weighted-average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS(4)
2,880.1

2,996.9

2,913.0

3,020.4

Basic earnings per share(5)
 
 
 

  
Income from continuing operations
$
1.25

$
1.36

$
3.60

$
4.39

Discontinued operations
(0.01
)

(0.02
)

Net income
$
1.24

$
1.36

$
3.58

$
4.38

Diluted earnings per share(5)
 
 
 
  
Income from continuing operations
$
1.25

$
1.36

$
3.60

$
4.38

Discontinued operations
(0.01
)

(0.02
)

Net income
$
1.24

$
1.35

$
3.58

$
4.38

(1)
During the third quarter of 2016, Citi distributed $225 million in dividends on its outstanding preferred stock. As of September 30, 2016, Citi estimates it will distribute preferred dividends of approximately $320 million during the remainder of 2016, in each case assuming such dividends are declared by the Citi Board of Directors.
(2)
Warrants issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and the loss-sharing agreement (all of which were subsequently sold to the public in January 2011), with exercise prices of $178.50 and $106.10 per share for approximately 21.0 million and 25.5 million shares of Citigroup common stock, respectively. Both warrants were not included in the computation of earnings per share in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 because they were anti-dilutive.
(3)
During the third quarters of 2016 and 2015, weighted-average options to purchase 3.6 million and 0.9 million shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of earnings per share because the weighted-average exercise prices of $85.92 and $201.01 per share, respectively, were anti-dilutive.
(4)
Due to rounding, common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS and the effect of dilutive securities may not sum to common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS.
(5)
Due to rounding, earnings per share on continuing operations and discontinued operations may not sum to earnings per share on net income.


114



10. FEDERAL FUNDS, SECURITIES BORROWED, LOANED AND SUBJECT TO REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
For additional information on the Company’s resale and repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and lending agreements, see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell, at their respective carrying values, consisted of the following:
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2016
December 31, 2015
Federal funds sold
$
41

$
25

Securities purchased under agreements to resell
135,967

119,777

Deposits paid for securities borrowed
100,037

99,873

Total
$
236,045

$
219,675

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase, at their respective carrying values, consisted of the following:
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2016
December 31, 2015
Federal funds purchased
$
372

$
189

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
135,907

131,650

Deposits received for securities loaned
16,845

14,657

Total
$
153,124

$
146,496

It is the Company’s policy to take possession of the underlying collateral, monitor its market value relative to the amounts due under the agreements and, when necessary,
 
require prompt transfer of additional collateral in order to maintain contractual margin protection. For resale and repurchase agreements, when necessary, the Company posts additional collateral in order to maintain contractual margin protection.
A substantial portion of the resale and repurchase agreements is recorded at fair value, as described in Notes 20 and 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The remaining portion is carried at the amount of cash initially advanced or received, plus accrued interest, as specified in the respective agreements.
A substantial portion of securities borrowing and lending agreements is recorded at the amount of cash advanced or received. The remaining portion is recorded at fair value as the Company elected the fair value option for certain securities borrowed and loaned portfolios, as described in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. With respect to securities loaned, the Company receives cash collateral in an amount generally in excess of the market value of the securities loaned. The Company monitors the market value of securities borrowed and securities loaned on a daily basis and obtains or posts additional collateral in order to maintain contractual margin protection.

The following tables present the gross and net resale and repurchase agreements and securities borrowing and lending
agreements and the related offsetting amount permitted under ASC-210-20-45. The tables also include amounts related to financial instruments that are not permitted to be offset under ASC-210-20-45 but would be eligible for offsetting to the extent that an event of default occurred and a legal opinion supporting enforceability of the offsetting rights has been obtained. Remaining exposures continue to be secured by financial collateral, but the Company may not have sought or been able to obtain a legal opinion evidencing enforceability of the offsetting right.

 
As of September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Gross amounts
of recognized
assets
Gross amounts
offset on the
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(1)
Net amounts of
assets included on
the Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(2)
Amounts
not offset on the
Consolidated Balance
Sheet but eligible for
offsetting upon
counterparty default
(3)
Net
amounts
(4)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
$
194,788

$
58,821

$
135,967

$
105,941

$
30,026

Deposits paid for securities borrowed
100,037


100,037

15,835

84,202

Total
$
294,825

$
58,821

$
236,004

$
121,776

$
114,228


In millions of dollars
Gross amounts
of recognized
liabilities
Gross amounts
offset on the
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(1)
Net amounts of
liabilities included on
the Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(2)
Amounts
not offset on the
Consolidated Balance
Sheet but eligible for
offsetting upon
counterparty default
(3)
Net
amounts
(4)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
$
194,728

$
58,821

$
135,907

$
65,748

$
70,159

Deposits received for securities loaned
16,845


16,845

2,871

13,974

Total
$
211,573

$
58,821

$
152,752

$
68,619

$
84,133


115




 
As of December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Gross amounts
of recognized
assets
Gross amounts
offset on the
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(1)
Net amounts of
assets included on
the Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(2)
Amounts
not offset on the
Consolidated Balance
Sheet but eligible for
offsetting upon
counterparty default
(3)
Net
amounts
(4)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
$
176,167

$
56,390

$
119,777

$
92,039

$
27,738

Deposits paid for securities borrowed
99,873


99,873

16,619

83,254

Total
$
276,040

$
56,390

$
219,650

$
108,658

$
110,992

In millions of dollars
Gross amounts
of recognized
liabilities
Gross amounts
offset on the
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(1)
Net amounts of
liabilities included on
the Consolidated
Balance Sheet
(2)
Amounts
not offset on the
Consolidated Balance
Sheet but eligible for
offsetting upon
counterparty default
(3)
Net
amounts
(4)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
$
188,040

$
56,390

$
131,650

$
60,641

$
71,009

Deposits received for securities loaned
14,657


14,657

3,226

11,431

Total
$
202,697

$
56,390

$
146,307

$
63,867

$
82,440

(1)
Includes financial instruments subject to enforceable master netting agreements that are permitted to be offset under ASC 210-20-45.
(2)
The total of this column for each period excludes Federal funds sold/purchased. See tables above.
(3)
Includes financial instruments subject to enforceable master netting agreements that are not permitted to be offset under ASC 210-20-45, but would be eligible for offsetting to the extent that an event of default has occurred and a legal opinion supporting enforceability of the offsetting right has been obtained.
(4)
Remaining exposures continue to be secured by financial collateral, but the Company may not have sought or been able to obtain a legal opinion evidencing enforceability of the offsetting right.

The following tables present the gross amount of liabilities associated with repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements, by remaining contractual maturity:

 
As of September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Open and overnight
Up to 30 days
31–90 days
Greater than 90 days
Total
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
$
98,771

$
53,335

$
19,329

$
23,293

$
194,728

Deposits received for securities loaned
10,805

2,964

1,114

1,962

16,845

Total
$
109,576

$
56,299

$
20,443

$
25,255

$
211,573



 
As of December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Open and overnight
Up to 30 days
31–90 days
Greater than 90 days
Total
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
$
89,732

$
54,336

$
21,541

$
22,431

$
188,040

Deposits received for securities loaned
9,096

1,823

2,324

1,414

14,657

Total
$
98,828

$
56,159

$
23,865

$
23,845

$
202,697




116



The following tables present the gross amount of liabilities associated with repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements, by class of underlying collateral:

 
As of September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Repurchase agreements
Securities lending agreements
Total
U.S. Treasury and federal agency
$
73,237

$
349

$
73,586

State and municipal
381


381

Foreign government
63,382

958

64,340

Corporate bonds
18,638

725

19,363

Equity securities
10,707

14,171

24,878

Mortgage-backed securities
19,459


19,459

Asset-backed securities
4,998


4,998

Other
3,926

642

4,568

Total
$
194,728

$
16,845

$
211,573


 
As of December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Repurchase agreements
Securities lending agreements
Total
U.S. Treasury and federal agency
$
67,005

$

$
67,005

State and municipal
403


403

Foreign government
66,633

789

67,422

Corporate bonds
15,355

1,085

16,440

Equity securities
10,297

12,484

22,781

Mortgage-backed securities
19,913


19,913

Asset-backed securities
4,572


4,572

Other
3,862

299

4,161

Total
$
188,040

$
14,657

$
202,697



117



11. BROKERAGE RECEIVABLES AND BROKERAGE
PAYABLES

The Company has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers, dealers and customers, which arise in the ordinary course of business. For additional information on these receivables and payables, see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Brokerage receivables and Brokerage payables consisted of the following:
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2016
December 31, 2015
Receivables from customers
$
11,004

$
10,435

Receivables from brokers, dealers, and clearing organizations
25,108

17,248

Total brokerage receivables(1)
$
36,112

$
27,683

Payables to customers
$
42,619

$
35,653

Payables to brokers, dealers, and clearing organizations
19,302

18,069

Total brokerage payables(1)
$
61,921

$
53,722


(1)
Brokerage receivables and payables are accounted for in accordance with the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Brokers and Dealers in Securities as codified in ASC 940-320.



12.   INVESTMENTS

For additional information regarding Citi’s investments portfolios, including evaluating investments for other-than-temporary impairment, see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview
The following table presents Citi’s investments by category:
 
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
In millions of dollars
Securities available-for-sale (AFS)
$
308,117

$
299,136

Debt securities held-to-maturity (HTM)(1)
38,588

36,215

Non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value(2)
1,977

2,088

Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost(3)
6,258

5,516

Total investments
$
354,940

$
342,955

(1)
Carried at adjusted amortized cost basis, net of any credit-related impairment.
(2)
Unrealized gains and losses for non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value are recognized in earnings.
(3)
Primarily consists of shares issued by the Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Home Loan Banks, foreign central banks and various clearing houses of which Citigroup is a member.

The following table presents interest and dividend income on investments:
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Taxable interest
$
1,741

$
1,596

$
5,219

$
4,773

Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax
111

44

345

116

Dividend income
35

87

115

305

Total interest and dividend income
$
1,887

$
1,727

$
5,679

$
5,194


118



The following table presents realized gains and losses on the sale of investments, which excludes losses from other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI):
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Gross realized investment gains
$
483

$
213

$
1,105

$
926

Gross realized investment losses
(196
)
(62
)
(432
)
(285
)
Net realized gains on sale of investments
$
287

$
151

$
673

$
641


 



Securities Available-for-Sale
The amortized cost and fair value of AFS securities were as follows:
 
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Amortized
cost
Gross
unrealized
gains
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Amortized
cost
Gross
unrealized
gains
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Debt securities AFS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities(1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
42,465

$
808

$
71

$
43,202

$
39,584

$
367

$
237

$
39,714

Prime
5



5

2



2

Alt-A
45

5


50

50

5


55

Non-U.S. residential
4,437

19

10

4,446

5,909

31

11

5,929

Commercial
351

4

1

354

573

2

4

571

Total mortgage-backed securities
$
47,303

$
836

$
82

$
48,057

$
46,118

$
405

$
252

$
46,271

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury
$
108,857

$
1,979

$
33

$
110,803

$
113,096

$
254

$
515

$
112,835

Agency obligations
10,801

108

6

10,903

10,095

22

37

10,080

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
119,658

$
2,087

$
39

$
121,706

$
123,191

$
276

$
552

$
122,915

State and municipal
$
11,703

$
201

$
713

$
11,191

$
12,099

$
132

$
772

$
11,459

Foreign government
97,633

708

201

98,140

88,751

402

479

88,674

Corporate
18,982

230

132

19,080

19,492

129

291

19,330

Asset-backed securities(1)
7,452

6

32

7,426

9,261

5

92

9,174

Other debt securities
1,192



1,192

688



688

Total debt securities AFS
$
303,923

$
4,068

$
1,199

$
306,792

$
299,600

$
1,349

$
2,438

$
298,511

Marketable equity securities AFS
$
1,309

$
18

$
2

$
1,325

$
602

$
26

$
3

$
625

Total securities AFS
$
305,232

$
4,086

$
1,201

$
308,117

$
300,202

$
1,375

$
2,441

$
299,136

(1)
The Company invests in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. These securitizations are generally considered VIEs. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss from these VIEs is equal to the carrying amount of the securities, which is reflected in the table above. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations in which the Company has other involvement, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.






 






119



The following shows the fair value of AFS securities that have been in an unrealized loss position:
 
Less than 12 months
12 months or longer
Total
In millions of dollars
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrealized
losses
September 30, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities AFS
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
2,325

$
10

$
1,925

$
61

$
4,250

$
71

Non-U.S. residential
45


1,899

10

1,944

10

Commercial
38


44

1

82

1

Total mortgage-backed securities
$
2,408

$
10

$
3,868

$
72

$
6,276

$
82

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury
$
7,895

$
33

$
175

$

$
8,070

$
33

Agency obligations
1,450

3

131

3

1,581

6

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
9,345

$
36

$
306

$
3

$
9,651

$
39

State and municipal
$
302

$
14

$
3,632

$
699

$
3,934

$
713

Foreign government
23,678

116

8,230

85

31,908

201

Corporate
2,625

84

1,831

48

4,456

132

Asset-backed securities
522


4,917

32

5,439

32

Other debt securities
25




25


Marketable equity securities AFS
12

2

13


25

2

Total securities AFS
$
38,917

$
262

$
22,797

$
939

$
61,714

$
1,201

December 31, 2015
 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities AFS
 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
17,816

$
141

$
2,618

$
96

$
20,434

$
237

Prime


1


1


Non-U.S. residential
2,217

7

825

4

3,042

11

Commercial
291

3

55

1

346

4

Total mortgage-backed securities
$
20,324

$
151

$
3,499

$
101

$
23,823

$
252

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury
$
59,384

$
505

$
1,204

$
10

$
60,588

$
515

Agency obligations
6,716

30

196

7

6,912

37

Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
66,100

$
535

$
1,400

$
17

$
67,500

$
552

State and municipal
$
635

$
26

$
4,450

$
746

$
5,085

$
772

Foreign government
34,053

371

4,021

108

38,074

479

Corporate
7,024

190

1,919

101

8,943

291

Asset-backed securities
5,311

58

2,247

34

7,558

92

Other debt securities
27




27


Marketable equity securities AFS
132

3

1


133

3

Total securities AFS
$
133,606

$
1,334

$
17,537

$
1,107

$
151,143

$
2,441


120



The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of AFS debt securities by contractual maturity dates:
 
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Amortized
cost
Fair
value
Amortized
cost
Fair
value
Mortgage-backed securities(1)
 
 
 
 
Due within 1 year
$
176

$
176

$
114

$
114

After 1 but within 5 years
843

850

1,408

1,411

After 5 but within 10 years
2,246

2,300

1,750

1,751

After 10 years(2)
44,038

44,731

42,846

42,995

Total
$
47,303

$
48,057

$
46,118

$
46,271

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
 
 
 
 
Due within 1 year
$
3,020

$
3,022

$
3,016

$
3,014

After 1 but within 5 years
104,323

105,934

107,034

106,878

After 5 but within 10 years
12,217

12,655

12,786

12,684

After 10 years(2)
98

95

355

339

Total
$
119,658

$
121,706

$
123,191

$
122,915

State and municipal
 
 
 
 
Due within 1 year
$
2,157

$
2,155

$
3,289

$
3,287

After 1 but within 5 years
2,685

2,693

1,781

1,781

After 5 but within 10 years
459

469

502

516

After 10 years(2)
6,402

5,874

6,527

5,875

Total
$
11,703

$
11,191

$
12,099

$
11,459

Foreign government
 
 
 
 
Due within 1 year
$
28,878

$
28,898

$
25,898

$
25,905

After 1 but within 5 years
53,253

53,089

43,514

43,464

After 5 but within 10 years
12,952

13,479

17,013

16,968

After 10 years(2)
2,550

2,674

2,326

2,337

Total
$
97,633

$
98,140

$
88,751

$
88,674

All other(3)
 
 
 
 
Due within 1 year
$
3,065

$
3,068

$
2,354

$
2,355

After 1 but within 5 years
13,637

13,758

14,035

14,054

After 5 but within 10 years
7,833

7,818

9,789

9,593

After 10 years(2)
3,091

3,054

3,263

3,190

Total
$
27,626

$
27,698

$
29,441

$
29,192

Total debt securities AFS
$
303,923

$
306,792

$
299,600

$
298,511

(1)
Includes mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government-sponsored agencies.
(2)
Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.
(3)
Includes corporate, asset-backed and other debt securities.


121



Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity

The carrying value and fair value of debt securities HTM were as follows:
In millions of dollars
Amortized
cost basis(1)
Net unrealized gains
(losses)
recognized in
AOCI
Carrying
value(2)
Gross
unrealized
gains
Gross
unrealized
(losses)
Fair
value
September 30, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities held-to-maturity
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities(3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government agency guaranteed
$
16,888

$
125

$
17,013

$
414

$
(3
)
$
17,424

Prime
41

(8
)
33

3


36

Alt-A
343

(28
)
315

85

(1
)
399

Subprime






Non-U.S. residential
2,058

(53
)
2,005

45

(6
)
2,044

Total mortgage-backed securities
$
19,330

$
36

$
19,366

$
547

$
(10
)
$
19,903

State and municipal
$
8,304

$
(380
)
$
7,924

$
402

$
(77
)
$
8,249

Foreign government
2,120


2,120


(9
)
2,111

Asset-backed securities(3)
9,184

(6
)
9,178

25

(10
)
9,193

Total debt securities held-to-maturity
$
38,938

$
(350
)
$
38,588

$
974

$
(106
)
$
39,456

December 31, 2015
 
 

 

 

 

 

Debt securities held-to-maturity
 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities(3)
 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government agency guaranteed
$
17,648

$
138

$
17,786

$
71

$
(100
)
$
17,757

Prime
121

(78
)
43

3

(1
)
45

Alt-A
433

(1
)
432

259

(162
)
529

Subprime
2


2

13


15

Non-U.S. residential
1,330

(60
)
1,270

37


1,307

Total mortgage-backed securities
$
19,534

$
(1
)
$
19,533

$
383

$
(263
)
$
19,653

State and municipal
$
8,581

$
(438
)
$
8,143

$
245

$
(87
)
$
8,301

Foreign government
4,068


4,068

28

(3
)
4,093

Asset-backed securities(3)
4,485

(14
)
4,471

34

(41
)
4,464

Total debt securities held-to-maturity
$
36,668

$
(453
)
$
36,215

$
690

$
(394
)
$
36,511

(1)
For securities transferred to HTM from Trading account assets, amortized cost basis is defined as the fair value of the securities at the date of transfer plus any accretion income and less any impairments recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer. For securities transferred to HTM from AFS, amortized cost is defined as the original purchase cost, adjusted for the cumulative accretion or amortization of any purchase discount or premium, plus or minus any cumulative fair value hedge adjustments, net of accretion or amortization, and less any other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings.
(2)
HTM securities are carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at amortized cost basis, plus or minus any unamortized unrealized gains and losses and fair value hedge adjustments recognized in AOCI prior to reclassifying the securities from AFS to HTM. Changes in the values of these securities are not reported in the financial statements, except for the amortization of any difference between the carrying value at the transfer date and par value of the securities, and the recognition of any non-credit fair value adjustments in AOCI in connection with the recognition of any credit impairment in earnings related to securities the Company continues to intend to hold until maturity.
(3)
The Company invests in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. These securitizations are generally considered VIEs. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss from these VIEs is equal to the carrying amount of the securities, which is reflected in the table above. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations in which the Company has other involvement, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.









 





122



The table below shows the fair value of debt securities HTM that have been in an unrecognized loss position:
 
Less than 12 months
12 months or longer
Total
In millions of dollars
Fair
value
Gross
unrecognized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrecognized
losses
Fair
value
Gross
unrecognized
losses
September 30, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities held-to-maturity
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
$
695

$
3

$
553

$
7

$
1,248

$
10

State and municipal
365

4

1,435

73

1,800

77

Foreign government
1,853

9



1,853

9

Asset-backed securities
10

1

2,213

9

2,223

10

Total debt securities held-to-maturity
$
2,923

$
17

$
4,201

$
89

$
7,124

$
106

December 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities held-to-maturity
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
$
935

$
1

$
10,301

$
262

$
11,236

$
263

State and municipal
881

20

1,826

67

2,707

87

Foreign government
180

3



180

3

Asset-backed securities
132

13

3,232

28

3,364

41

Total debt securities held-to-maturity
$
2,128

$
37

$
15,359

$
357

$
17,487

$
394

Note: Excluded from the gross unrecognized losses presented in the above table are $(350) million and $(453) million of net unrealized losses recorded in AOCI as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, primarily related to the difference between the amortized cost and carrying value of HTM securities that were reclassified from AFS. Substantially all of these net unrecognized losses relate to securities that have been in a loss position for 12 months or longer at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

123



The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of HTM debt securities by contractual maturity dates:
 
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Carrying value
Fair value
Carrying value
Fair value
Mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 
Due within 1 year
$

$

$

$

After 1 but within 5 years
766

788

172

172

After 5 but within 10 years
57

59

660

663

After 10 years(1)
18,543

19,056

18,701

18,818

Total
$
19,366

$
19,903

$
19,533

$
19,653

State and municipal
 
 
 
 
Due within 1 year
$
535

$
534

$
309

$
305

After 1 but within 5 years
139

140

336

335

After 5 but within 10 years
234

247

262

270

After 10 years(1)
7,016

7,328

7,236

7,391

Total
$
7,924

$
8,249

$
8,143

$
8,301

Foreign government
 
 
 
 
Due within 1 year
$
1,571

$
1,572

$

$

After 1 but within 5 years
549

539

4,068

4,093

After 5 but within 10 years




After 10 years(1)




Total
$
2,120

$
2,111

$
4,068

$
4,093

All other(2)
 
 
 
 
Due within 1 year
$

$

$

$

After 1 but within 5 years




After 5 but within 10 years
508

508



After 10 years(1)
8,670

8,685

4,471

4,464

Total
$
9,178

$
9,193

$
4,471

$
4,464

Total debt securities held-to-maturity
$
38,588

$
39,456

$
36,215

$
36,511

(1)
Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.
(2)
Includes corporate and asset-backed securities.

 



Recognition and Measurement of OTTI
The following tables present total OTTI recognized in earnings:
OTTI on Investments and Other Assets
Three Months Ended 
 September 30, 2016
Nine Months Ended  
  September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
AFS(1)
HTM
Other
Assets
Total
AFS(1)(2)
HTM
Other
Assets(3)
Total
Impairment losses related to securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total OTTI losses recognized during the period
$

$

$

$

$
3

$
1

$

$
4

Less: portion of impairment loss recognized in AOCI (before taxes)








Net impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell
$

$

$

$

$
3

$
1

$

$
4

Impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company intends to sell, would be more likely than not required to sell or will be subject to an issuer call deemed probable of exercise and FX losses
20

12


32

243

36

332

611

Total impairment losses recognized in earnings
$
20

$
12

$

$
32

$
246

$
37

$
332

$
615

(1)
Includes OTTI on non-marketable equity securities.
(2)
Includes a $160 million impairment related to AFS securities affected by changes in the Venezuela exchange rate during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

124



(3)
The impairment charge is related to the carrying value of an equity investment.

OTTI on Investments and Other Assets
Three Months Ended 
 September 30, 2015
Nine Months Ended 
  September 30, 2015
In millions of dollars
AFS(1)
HTM
Other
Assets
Total
AFS(1)
HTM
Other
assets
Total
Impairment losses related to securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total OTTI losses recognized during the period
$
1

$

$

$
1

$
1

$

$

$
1

Less: portion of impairment loss recognized in AOCI (before taxes)








Net impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell
$
1

$

$

$
1

$
1

$

$

$
1

Impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company intends to sell, would be more likely than not required to sell or will be subject to an issuer call deemed probable of exercise and FX losses
64

14

1

79

152

36

6

194

Total impairment losses recognized in earnings
$
65

$
14

$
1

$
80

$
153

$
36

$
6

$
195


(1)
Includes OTTI on non-marketable equity securities.


The following are three-month rollforwards of the credit-related impairments recognized in earnings for AFS and HTM debt securities held that the Company does not intend to sell nor likely will be required to sell:

 
Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on securities still held
In millions of dollars
Jun. 30, 2016 balance
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities not
previously
impaired
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities that
have
been previously
impaired
Reductions due to
credit-impaired
securities sold,
transferred or
matured
September 30, 2016 balance
AFS debt securities
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
$
294

$

$

$

$
294

State and municipal





Foreign government securities
170



(5
)
165

Corporate
110



(1
)
109

All other debt securities
144



(20
)
124

Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities
$
718

$

$

$
(26
)
$
692

HTM debt securities
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities(1)
$
532

$

$

$
(2
)
$
530

State and municipal
1




1

All other debt securities
131




131

Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities
$
664

$

$

$
(2
)
$
662

(1)
Primarily consists of Alt-A securities.


125



 
Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on securities still held
In millions of dollars
Jun. 30, 2015 balance
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities not
previously
impaired
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities that
have
been previously
impaired
Reductions due to
credit-impaired
securities sold,
transferred or
matured
Sep. 30, 2015 balance
AFS debt securities
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
$
295

$

$

$

$
295

State and municipal





Foreign government securities
170




170

Corporate
112

1



113

All other debt securities
149




149

Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities
$
726

$
1

$

$

$
727

HTM debt securities
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities(1)
$
650

$

$

$
(30
)
$
620

All other debt securities
133



(1
)
132

Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities
$
783

$

$

$
(31
)
$
752

(1)
Primarily consists of Alt-A securities.

The following are nine-month rollforwards of the credit-related impairments recognized in earnings for AFS and HTM debt securities held that the Company does not intend to sell nor likely will be required to sell:

 
Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on securities still held
In millions of dollars
Dec. 31, 2015 balance
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities not
previously
impaired
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities that
have
been previously
impaired
Reductions due to
credit-impaired
securities sold,
transferred or
matured
September 30, 2016 balance
AFS debt securities
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
$
294

$
1

$

$
(1
)
$
294

State and municipal
8



(8
)

Foreign government securities
170



(5
)
165

Corporate
112

1

2

(6
)
109

All other debt securities
148



(24
)
124

Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities
$
732

$
2

$
2

$
(44
)
$
692

HTM debt securities
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities(1)
$
556

$

$

$
(26
)
$
530

State and municipal

1



1

All other debt securities
132



(1
)
131

Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities
$
688

$
1

$

$
(27
)
$
662

(1)
Primarily consists of Alt-A securities.


126



 
Cumulative OTTI credit losses recognized in earnings on securities still held
In millions of dollars
Dec. 31, 2014 balance
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities not
previously
impaired
Credit
impairments
recognized in
earnings on
securities that
have
been previously
impaired
Reductions due to
credit-impaired
securities sold,
transferred or
matured
September 30, 2015 balance
AFS debt securities
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
$
295

$

$

$

$
295

State and municipal





Foreign government securities
171



(1
)
170

Corporate
118

1


(6
)
113

All other debt securities
149




149

Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities
$
733

$
1

$

$
(7
)
$
727

HTM debt securities
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities(1)
$
670

$

$

$
(50
)
$
620

All other debt securities
133



(1
)
132

Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities
$
803

$

$

$
(51
)
$
752

(1)
Primarily consists of Alt-A securities.

Investments in Alternative Investment Funds That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share
The Company holds investments in certain alternative investment funds that calculate net asset value (NAV), including hedge funds, private equity funds, funds of funds and real estate funds. Investments in such funds are generally classified as nonmarketable equity securities carried at fair value. The fair values of these investments are estimated using the NAV of the Company’s ownership interest in the funds. These investments include co-investments in funds that are managed by the Company and investments in funds that are
 
managed by third parties. Some of these investments are in “covered funds” for purposes of the Volcker Rule, which prohibits certain proprietary investment activities and limits the ownership of, and relationships with, covered funds. The deadline for compliance with the Volcker Rule is July 2017, by which date Citi is required to sell those of its investments in covered funds prohibited by the rule. Subject to market demand, the Company may receive value that is lower than the reported NAV for these investments.


 
Fair value
Unfunded
commitments
Redemption frequency
(if currently eligible)
monthly, quarterly, annually
Redemption 
notice
period
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2016
December 31, 2015
September 30,
2016
December 31, 2015
 
 
Hedge funds
$
3

$
3

$

$

Generally quarterly
10–95 days
Private equity funds(1)(2)
675

762

129

173

Real estate funds (2)(3)
69

130

22

21

Total(4)
$
747

$
895

$
151

$
194

(1)
Private equity funds include funds that invest in infrastructure, leveraged buyout transactions, emerging markets and venture capital.
(2)
With respect to the Company’s investments in private equity funds and real estate funds, distributions from each fund will be received as the underlying assets held by these funds are liquidated. It is estimated that the underlying assets of these funds will be liquidated over a period of several years as market conditions allow. Private equity and real estate funds do not allow redemption of investments by their investors. Investors are permitted to sell or transfer their investments, subject to the approval of the general partner or investment manager of these funds, which generally may not be unreasonably withheld.
(3)
Includes several real estate funds that invest primarily in commercial real estate in the U.S., Europe and Asia.
(4)
The fair value of investments above is based on NAVs provided by third-party asset managers.

127



13.   LOANS

Citigroup loans are reported in two categories—consumer and corporate. These categories are classified primarily according to the segment and subsegment that manage the loans. For additional information regarding Citi’s consumer and corporate loans, including related accounting policies, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Consumer Loans
Consumer loans represent loans and leases managed primarily by GCB in Citicorp and in Citi Holdings. The following table provides Citi’s consumer loans by loan type:

In millions of dollars
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
In U.S. offices
 
 
Mortgage and real estate(1)
$
75,057

$
80,281

Installment, revolving credit, and other
3,465

3,480

Cards(2)
124,637

112,800

Commercial and industrial
6,989

6,407

 
$
210,148

$
202,968

In offices outside the U.S.
 
 
Mortgage and real estate(1)
$
45,751

$
47,062

Installment, revolving credit, and other
28,217

29,480

Cards
25,833

27,342

Commercial and industrial
17,828

17,741

Lease financing
113

362

 
$
117,742

$
121,987

Total consumer loans
$
327,890

$
324,955

Net unearned income
$
812

830

Consumer loans, net of unearned income
$
328,702

$
325,785


(1)
Loans secured primarily by real estate.
(2)
September 30, 2016 balance includes loans related to the acquisition of the Costco U.S. co-branded credit card portfolio, completed on June 17, 2016 in addition to subsequent activity.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company sold and/or reclassified to held-for-sale $1.3 billion and $6.0 billion, and $1.5 billion and $16.3 billion respectively, of consumer loans.

 










128



Consumer Loan Delinquency and Non-Accrual Details at September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Total
current(1)(2)
30–89 days
past due(3)
≥ 90 days
past due(3)
Past due
government
guaranteed(4)
Total
loans(2)
Total
non-accrual
90 days past due
and accruing
In North America offices
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
$
52,266

$
564

$
336

$
1,499

$
54,665

$
1,225

$
1,267

Home equity loans(5)
19,324

261

434


20,019

728


Credit cards
122,592

1,460

1,271


125,323


1,271

Installment and other
4,647

64

38


4,749

69


Commercial banking loans
8,627

23

141


8,791

407

12

Total
$
207,456

$
2,372

$
2,220

$
1,499

$
213,547

$
2,429

$
2,550

In offices outside North America
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
$
38,433

$
244

$
158

$

$
38,835

$
392

$

Credit cards
24,270

438

391


25,099

258

260

Installment and other
25,632

334

140


26,106

314


Commercial banking loans
24,981

13

117


25,111

158


Total
$
113,316

$
1,029

$
806

$

$
115,151

$
1,122

$
260

Total GCB and Citi Holdings consumer
$
320,772

$
3,401

$
3,026

$
1,499

$
328,698

$
3,551

$
2,810

Other(6)
4




4

1


Total Citigroup
$
320,776

$
3,401

$
3,026

$
1,499

$
328,702

$
3,552

$
2,810

(1)
Loans less than 30 days past due are presented as current.
(2)
Includes $31 million of residential first mortgages recorded at fair value.
(3)
Excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities.
(4)
Consists of residential first mortgages that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities that are 30–89 days past due of $0.2 billion and 90 days or more past due of $1.3 billion.
(5)
Fixed-rate home equity loans and loans extended under home equity lines of credit, which are typically in junior lien positions.
(6)
Represents loans classified as consumer loans on the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are not included in the Citi Holdings consumer credit metrics.
Consumer Loan Delinquency and Non-Accrual Details at December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Total
current(1)(2)
30–89 days
past due(3)
≥ 90 days
past due(3)
Past due
government
guaranteed(4)
Total
loans(2)
Total
non-accrual
90 days past due
and accruing
In North America offices
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
$
53,146

$
846

$
564

$
2,318

$
56,874

$
1,216

$
1,997

Home equity loans(5)
22,335

136

277


22,748

1,017


Credit cards
110,814

1,296

1,243


113,353


1,243

Installment and other
4,576

80

33


4,689

56

2

Commercial banking loans
8,241

16

61


8,318

222

17

Total
$
199,112

$
2,374

$
2,178

$
2,318

$
205,982

$
2,511

$
3,259

In offices outside North America
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
$
39,551

$
240

$
175

$

$
39,966

$
388

$

Credit cards
25,698

477

442


26,617

261

278

Installment and other
27,664

317

220


28,201

226


Commercial banking loans
24,764

46

31


24,841

247


Total
$
117,677

$
1,080

$
868

$

$
119,625

$
1,122

$
278

Total GCB and Citi Holdings
$
316,789

$
3,454

$
3,046

$
2,318

$
325,607

$
3,633

$
3,537

Other(6)
164

7

7


178

25


Total Citigroup
$
316,953

$
3,461

$
3,053

$
2,318

$
325,785

$
3,658

$
3,537

(1)
Loans less than 30 days past due are presented as current.
(2)
Includes $34 million of residential first mortgages recorded at fair value.
(3)
Excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities.
(4)
Consists of residential first mortgages that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities that are 30–89 days past due of $0.3 billion and 90 days or more past due of $2.0 billion.
(5)
Fixed-rate home equity loans and loans extended under home equity lines of credit, which are typically in junior lien positions.

129



(6)
Represents loans classified as consumer loans on the Consolidated Balance Sheet that are not included in the Citi Holdings consumer credit metrics.

Consumer Credit Scores (FICO)
The following tables provide details on the FICO scores for Citi’s U.S. consumer loan portfolio (commercial banking loans are excluded since they are business based and FICO scores are not a primary driver in their credit evaluation). FICO scores are updated monthly for substantially all of the portfolio or, otherwise, on a quarterly basis for the remaining portfolio.
FICO score distribution in U.S. portfolio(1)(2)
September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Less than
620
≥ 620 but less
than 660
Equal to or
greater
than 660
Residential first mortgages
$
2,817

$
2,615

$
45,203

Home equity loans
1,751

1,502

15,600

Credit cards
7,660

10,484

103,781

Installment and other
326

269

2,649

Total
$
12,554

$
14,870

$
167,233

FICO score distribution in U.S. portfolio(1)(2)
December 31, 2015

In millions of dollars
Less than
620
≥ 620 but less
than 660
Equal to or
greater
than 660
Residential first mortgages
$
3,483

$
3,036

$
45,047

Home equity loans
2,067

1,782

17,837

Credit cards
7,341

10,072

93,194

Installment and other
337

270

2,662

Total
$
13,228

$
15,160

$
158,740

(1)
Excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government entities, loans subject to LTSCs with U.S. government-sponsored entities and loans recorded at fair value.
(2)
Excludes balances where FICO was not available. Such amounts are not material.

 

Loan to Value (LTV) Ratios
The following tables provide details on the LTV ratios (loan balance divided by appraised value) for Citi’s U.S. consumer mortgage portfolios. LTV ratios are updated monthly using the most recent Core Logic Home Price Index data available for substantially all of the portfolio applied at the Metropolitan Statistical Area level, if available, or the state level if not. The remainder of the portfolio is updated in a similar manner using the Federal Housing Finance Agency indices.
LTV distribution in U.S. portfolio(1)(2)
September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Less than or
equal to 80%
> 80% but less
than or equal to
100%
Greater
than
100%
Residential first mortgages
$
47,092

$
3,299

$
315

Home equity loans
13,358

3,974

1,425

Total
$
60,450

$
7,273

$
1,740

LTV distribution in U.S. portfolio(1)(2)
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Less than or
equal to 80%
> 80% but less
than or equal to
100%
Greater
than
100%
Residential first mortgages
$
46,559

$
4,478

$
626

Home equity loans
13,904

5,147

2,527

Total
$
60,463

$
9,625

$
3,153

(1)
Excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government entities, loans subject to LTSCs with U.S. government-sponsored entities and loans recorded at fair value.
(2)
Excludes balances where LTV was not available. Such amounts are not material.



130



Impaired Consumer Loans
The following tables present information about impaired consumer loans and interest income recognized on impaired consumer loans:
 
 
 
 
 
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
 
Balance at September 30, 2016
2016
2015
2016
2015
In millions of dollars
Recorded
investment(1)(2)
Unpaid
principal balance
Related
specific allowance(3)
Average
carrying value (4)
Interest income
recognized
(5)
Interest income
recognized
(5)
Interest income
recognized(5)
Interest income
recognized(5)
Mortgage and real estate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
$
4,314

$
4,752

$
578

$
5,195

$
31

$
107

$
135

$
359

Home equity loans
1,311

1,830

200

1,351

8

16

26

50

Credit cards
1,830

1,865

580

1,882

42

47

122

135

Installment and other
 
 
 
 

 


Individual installment and other
480

516

236

478

8

8

22

47

Commercial banking loans
589

918

113

498

7

4

11

10

Total
$
8,524

$
9,881

$
1,707

$
9,404

$
96

$
182

$
316

$
601

(1)
Recorded investment in a loan includes net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount and direct write-downs and includes accrued interest only on credit card loans.
(2)
$1,068 million of residential first mortgages, $416 million of home equity loans and $98 million of commercial market loans do not have a specific allowance.
(3) Included in the Allowance for loan losses.
(4) Average carrying value represents the average recorded investment ending balance for the last four quarters and does not include the related specific allowance.
(5) Includes amounts recognized on both an accrual and cash basis.


 
Balance, December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Recorded
investment(1)(2)
Unpaid
principal balance
Related
specific allowance(3)
Average
carrying value(4)
Mortgage and real estate
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
$
6,038

$
6,610

$
739

$
8,932

Home equity loans
1,399

1,972

406

1,778

Credit cards
1,950

1,986

604

2,079

Installment and other
 
 
 
 
Individual installment and other
464

519

197

449

Commercial banking loans
341

572

100

361

Total
$
10,192

$
11,659

$
2,046

$
13,599

(1)
Recorded investment in a loan includes net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount and direct write-downs and includes accrued interest only on credit card loans.
(2)
$1,151 million of residential first mortgages, $459 million of home equity loans and $86 million of commercial market loans do not have a specific allowance.
(3)
Included in the Allowance for loan losses.
(4)
Average carrying value represents the average recorded investment ending balance for the last four quarters and does not include the related specific allowance.





131



Consumer Troubled Debt Restructurings

 
At and for the three months ended September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars except number of loans modified
Number of
loans modified
Post-
modification
recorded
investment
(1)(2)
Deferred
principal
(3)
Contingent
principal
forgiveness
(4)
Principal
forgiveness
(5)
Average
interest rate
reduction
North America
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
1,165

$
165

$
1

$

$
1

1
%
Home equity loans
1,117

61




2

Credit cards
51,260

199




18

Installment and other revolving
1,421

12




14

Commercial markets(6)
30

36





Total(8)
54,993

$
473

$
1

$

$
1

 

International
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
973

24




%
Credit cards
28,530

94



2

12

Installment and other revolving
12,283

69



2

8

Commercial markets(6)
44

39





Total(8)
41,830

$
226

$

$

$
4

 

 
At and for the three months ended September 30, 2015
In millions of dollars except number of loans modified
Number of
loans modified
Post-
modification
recorded
investment(1)(7)
Deferred
principal(3)
Contingent
principal
forgiveness(4)
Principal
forgiveness(5)
Average
interest rate
reduction
North America
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
2,282

$
305

$
2

$
1

$
7

1
%
Home equity loans
1,021

36




2

Credit cards
44,972

186




16

Installment and other revolving
1,035

9




13

Commercial markets(6)
89

10





Total(8)
49,399

$
546

$
2

$
1

$
7

 

International
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
1,322

30




%
Credit cards
32,774

87



2

13

Installment and other revolving
19,283

76



1

5

Commercial markets(6)
37

11





Total(8)
53,416

$
204

$

$

$
3

 


(1)
Post-modification balances include past due amounts that are capitalized at the modification date.
(2)
Post-modification balances in North America include $17 million of residential first mortgages and $5 million of home equity loans to borrowers who have gone through Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the three months ended September 30, 2016. These amounts include $11 million of residential first mortgages and $5 million of home equity loans that were newly classified as TDRs in the three months ended September 30, 2016, based on previously received OCC guidance.
(3)
Represents portion of contractual loan principal that is non-interest bearing but still due from the borrower. Such deferred principal is charged off at the time of permanent modification to the extent that the related loan balance exceeds the underlying collateral value.
(4)
Represents portion of contractual loan principal that is non-interest bearing and, depending upon borrower performance, eligible for forgiveness.
(5)
Represents portion of contractual loan principal that was forgiven at the time of permanent modification.
(6) Commercial banking loans are generally borrower-specific modifications and incorporate changes in the amount and/or timing of principal and/or interest.
(7) Post-modification balances in North America include $54 million of residential first mortgages and $17 million of home equity loans to borrowers who have gone through Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the three months ended September 30, 2015. These amounts include $34 million of residential first mortgages and $14 million of home equity loans that were newly classified as TDRs in the three months ended September 30, 2015, based on previously received OCC guidance.
(8) The above tables reflect activity for loans outstanding as of the end of the reporting period that were considered TDRs.

132



 
At and for the nine months ended September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars except number of loans modified
Number of
loans modified
Post-
modification
recorded
investment(1)(2)
Deferred
principal(3)
Contingent
principal
forgiveness(4)
Principal
forgiveness(5)
Average
interest rate
reduction
North America
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
3,979

$
582

$
4

$

$
3

1
%
Home equity loans
2,789

121

1



2

Credit cards
143,161

552




17

Installment and other revolving
4,187

35




14

Commercial banking(6)
94

47





Total(8)
154,210

$
1,337

$
5

$

$
3

 
International
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
2,005

$
62

$

$

$

%
Credit cards
109,365

307



7

12

Installment and other revolving
45,125

208



6

7

Commercial banking(6)
117

90





Total(8)
156,612

$
667

$

$

$
13

 

 
At and for the nine months ended September 30, 2015
In millions of dollars except number of loans modified
Number of
loans modified
Post-
modification
recorded
investment(1)(7)
Deferred
principal(3)
Contingent
principal
forgiveness(4)
Principal
forgiveness(5)
Average
interest rate
reduction
North America
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
8,084

$
1,078

$
7

$
3

$
23

1
%
Home equity loans
3,571

126

1


3

2

Credit cards
140,130

582




16

Installment and other revolving
3,111

27




13

Commercial banking(6)
245

39





Total(8)
155,141

$
1,852

$
8

$
3

$
26

 
International
 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
2,963

$
80

$

$

$

%
Credit cards
110,792

288



5

13

Installment and other revolving
48,397

207



5

5

Commercial banking(6)
163

61




1

Total(8)
162,315

$
636

$

$

$
10

 

(1)
Post-modification balances include past due amounts that are capitalized at the modification date.
(2)
Post-modification balances in North America include $58 million of residential first mortgages and $14 million of home equity loans to borrowers who have gone through Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the nine months ended September 30, 2016. These amounts include $38 million of residential first mortgages and $14 million of home equity loans that were newly classified as TDRs in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, based on previously received OCC guidance.
(3)
Represents portion of contractual loan principal that is non-interest bearing but still due from the borrower. Such deferred principal is charged off at the time of permanent modification to the extent that the related loan balance exceeds the underlying collateral value.
(4)
Represents portion of contractual loan principal that is non-interest bearing and, depending upon borrower performance, eligible for forgiveness.
(5)
Represents portion of contractual loan principal that was forgiven at the time of permanent modification.
(6) Commercial banking loans are generally borrower-specific modifications and incorporate changes in the amount and/or timing of principal and/or interest.
(7) Post-modification balances in North America include $181 million of residential first mortgages and $46 million of home equity loans to borrowers who have gone through Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the nine months ended September 30, 2015. These amounts include $107 million of residential first mortgages and $39 million of home equity loans that were newly classified as TDRs in the nine months ended September 30, 2015, based on previously received OCC guidance.
(8) The above tables reflect activity for loans outstanding as of the end of the reporting period that were considered TDRs.



133



The following table presents consumer TDRs that defaulted for which the payment default occurred within one year of a permanent modification. Default is defined as 60 days past due, except for classifiably managed commercial banking loans, where default is defined as 90 days past due.
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
North America
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
$
49

$
101

$
188

$
329

Home equity loans
6

9

20

30

Credit cards
43

47

139

139

Installment and other revolving
3

2

7

6

Commercial banking
12

1

14

5

Total
$
113

$
160

$
368

$
509

International
 
 
 
 
Residential first mortgages
$
3

$
5

$
9

$
17

Credit cards
41

34

115

106

Installment and other revolving
24

20

70

66

Commercial banking
21

7

36

16

Total
$
89

$
66

$
230

$
205




134



Corporate Loans
Corporate loans represent loans and leases managed by ICG. The following table presents Citi’s corporate loans
by loan type:
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
In U.S. offices
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
50,156

$
41,147

Financial institutions
35,801

36,396

Mortgage and real estate(1)
41,078

37,565

Installment, revolving credit and other
32,571

33,374

Lease financing
1,532

1,780

 
$
161,138

$
150,262

In offices outside the U.S.
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
84,162

$
82,358

Financial institutions
27,305

28,704

Mortgage and real estate(1)
5,595

5,106

Installment, revolving credit and other
25,462

20,853

Lease financing
243

303

Governments and official institutions
6,506

4,911

 
$
149,273

$
142,235

Total corporate loans
$
310,411

$
292,497

Net unearned income
(678
)
(665
)
Corporate loans, net of unearned income
$
309,733

$
291,832

(1)
Loans secured primarily by real estate.
 
The Company sold and/or reclassified to held-for-sale $1.3 billion and $2.6 billion of corporate loans during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively and $0.5 billion and $1.6 billion during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The Company did not have significant purchases of corporate loans classified as held-for-investment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 or 2015.




135



Corporate Loan Delinquency and Non-Accrual Details at September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
30–89 days
past due
and accruing(1)
≥ 90 days
past due and
accruing(1)
Total past due
and accruing
Total
non-accrual(2)
Total
current(3)
Total
loans (4)
Commercial and industrial
$
208

$
4

$
212

$
1,940

$
129,531

$
131,683

Financial institutions



189

62,283

62,472

Mortgage and real estate
351


351

169

46,051

46,571

Leases
131

48

179

58

1,537

1,774

Other
269

1

270

59

62,965

63,294

Loans at fair value










3,939

Purchased distressed loans











Total
$
959

$
53

$
1,012

$
2,415

$
302,367

$
309,733

Corporate Loan Delinquency and Non-Accrual Details at December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
30–89 days
past due
and accruing(1)
≥ 90 days
past due and
accruing(1)
Total past due
and accruing
Total
non-accrual(2)
Total
current(3)
Total
loans (4)
Commercial and industrial
$
87

$
4

$
91

$
1,071

$
118,465

$
119,627

Financial institutions
16


16

173

64,128

64,317

Mortgage and real estate
137

7

144

232

42,095

42,471

Leases



76

2,006

2,082

Other
29


29

44

58,286

58,359

Loans at fair value










4,971

Purchased distressed loans










5

Total
$
269

$
11

$
280

$
1,596

$
284,980

$
291,832

(1)
Corporate loans that are 90 days past due are generally classified as non-accrual. Corporate loans are considered past due when principal or interest is contractually due but unpaid.
(2)
Non-accrual loans generally include those loans that are ≥ 90 days past due or those loans for which Citi believes, based on actual experience and a forward-looking assessment of the collectability of the loan in full, that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful.
(3)
Corporate loans are past due when principal or interest is contractually due but unpaid. Loans less than 30 days past due are presented as current.
(4)
Total loans include loans at fair value, which are not included in the various delinquency columns.






136



Corporate Loans Credit Quality Indicators
 
Recorded investment in loans(1)
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
Investment grade(2)
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
88,871

$
85,828

Financial institutions
50,485

53,522

Mortgage and real estate
21,477

18,869

Leases
1,283

1,725

Other
55,215

51,449

Total investment grade
$
217,331

$
211,393

Non-investment grade(2)
 
 
Accrual
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
40,871

$
32,726

Financial institutions
11,799

10,622

Mortgage and real estate
2,145

2,800

Leases
434

282

Other
8,019

6,867

Non-accrual
 
 
Commercial and industrial
1,940

1,071

Financial institutions
189

173

Mortgage and real estate
169

232

Leases
58

76

Other
59

44

Total non-investment grade
$
65,683

$
54,893

Private bank loans managed on a delinquency basis(2)
$
22,780

$
20,575

Loans at fair value
3,939

4,971

Corporate loans, net of unearned income
$
309,733

$
291,832

(1)
Recorded investment in a loan includes net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount, less any direct write-downs.
(2)
Held-for-investment loans are accounted for on an amortized cost basis.
 













137



Non-Accrual Corporate Loans
The following tables present non-accrual corporate loans and interest income recognized on non-accrual corporate loans:
 
September 30, 2016
Three Months
Ended
September 30, 2016
Nine Months
Ended
September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Recorded
investment(1)
Unpaid
principal balance
Related specific
allowance
Average
carrying value(2)
Interest income recognized(3)
Interest income recognized(3)
Non-accrual corporate loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
1,940

$
2,216

$
427

$
1,709

$
5

$
22

Financial institutions
189

196

8

180


3

Mortgage and real estate
169

288

18

197

3

6

Lease financing
58

58

1

49



Other
59

142

27

65

2

5

Total non-accrual corporate loans
$
2,415

$
2,900

$
481

$
2,200

$
10

$
36

 
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Recorded
investment(1)
Unpaid
principal balance
Related specific
allowance
Average
carrying value(2)
Non-accrual corporate loans
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
1,071

$
1,224

$
246

$
859

Financial institutions
173

196

10

194

Mortgage and real estate
232

336

21

240

Lease financing
76

76

54

62

Other
44

114

32

39

Total non-accrual corporate loans
$
1,596

$
1,946

$
363

$
1,394

 
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Recorded
investment(1)
Related specific
allowance
Recorded
investment(1)
Related specific
allowance
Non-accrual corporate loans with valuation allowances
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
1,616

$
427

$
571

$
246

Financial institutions
37

8

18

10

Mortgage and real estate
50

18

60

21

Lease financing
58

1

75

54

Other
53

27

40

32

Total non-accrual corporate loans with specific allowance
$
1,814

$
481

$
764

$
363

Non-accrual corporate loans without specific allowance
 
 
 
 
Commercial and industrial
$
324

 

$
500

 

Financial institutions
152

 

155

 

Mortgage and real estate
119

 

172

 

Lease financing

 

1

 

Other
6

 

4

 

Total non-accrual corporate loans without specific allowance
$
601

N/A

$
832

N/A

(1)
Recorded investment in a loan includes net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount, less any direct write-downs.
(2)
Average carrying value represents the average recorded investment balance and does not include related specific allowance.
(3)
Interest income recognized for the three- and six-month periods ended September 30, 2015 was $2 million and $7 million, respectively.


138




Corporate Troubled Debt Restructurings

At and for the three months ended September 30, 2016:
In millions of dollars
Carrying
Value
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
principal payments(1)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
interest payments(2)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
both principal and
interest payments
Commercial and industrial
$
112

$
103

$
2

$
7

Financial institutions
10

10



Mortgage and real estate
2

1


1

Other




Total
$
124

$
114

$
2

$
8


At and for the three months ended September 30, 2015:
In millions of dollars
Carrying
Value
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
principal payments(1)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
interest payments(2)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
both principal and
interest payments
Commercial and industrial
$
13

$
12

$

$
1

Mortgage and real estate
35

1


34

Total
$
48

$
13

$

$
35

At and for the nine months ended September 30, 2016:
In millions of dollars
Carrying
Value
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
principal payments(1)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
interest payments(2)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
both principal and
interest payments
Commercial and industrial
$
316

$
176

$
34

$
106

Financial institutions
10

10



Mortgage and real estate
7

1


6

Other
142


142


Total
$
475

$
187

$
176

$
112

At and for the nine months ended September 30, 2015:
In millions of dollars
Carrying
Value
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
principal payments(1)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
interest payments(2)
TDRs
involving changes
in the amount
and/or timing of
both principal and
interest payments
Commercial and industrial
$
79

$
45

$

$
34

Mortgage and real estate
47

3


44

Total
$
126

$
48

$

$
78

(1)
TDRs involving changes in the amount or timing of principal payments may involve principal forgiveness or deferral of periodic and/or final principal payments. Because forgiveness of principal is rare for commercial loans, modifications typically have little to no impact on the loans’ projected cash flows and thus little to no impact on the allowance established for the loans.  Charge-offs for amounts deemed uncollectable may be recorded at the time of the restructuring or may have already been recorded in prior periods such that no charge-off is required at the time of the modification.
(2)
TDRs involving changes in the amount or timing of interest payments may involve a below-market interest rate.



139



The following table presents total corporate loans modified in a TDR as well as those TDRs that defaulted and for which the payment default occurred within one year of a permanent modification. Default is defined as 60 days past due, except for classifiably managed commercial banking loans, where default is defined as 90 days past due.
In millions of dollars
TDR balances at September 30, 2016
TDR loans in payment default during the three months ended
September 30, 2016
TDR loans in payment default nine months ended
September 30, 2016
TDR balances at
September 30, 2015
TDR loans in payment default during the three months ended
September 30, 2015
TDR loans in payment default nine months ended
September 30, 2015
Commercial and industrial
$
394

$

$
7

$
126

$

$

Loans to financial institutions
10



1


1

Mortgage and real estate
80



144



Other
291



316



Total(1)
$
775

$

$
7

$
587

$

$
1


(1)
The above tables reflect activity for loans outstanding as of the end of the reporting period that were considered TDRs.




140



14. ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period
$
12,304

$
14,075

$
12,626

$
15,994

Gross credit losses
(1,948
)
(2,068
)
(6,139
)
(6,861
)
Gross recoveries(1)
423

405

1,274

1,321

Net credit losses (NCLs)(2)
$
(1,525
)
$
(1,663
)
$
(4,865
)
$
(5,540
)
NCLs
$
1,525

$
1,663

$
4,865

$
5,540

Net reserve builds (releases)
258

43

210

(247
)
Net specific reserve releases
(37
)
(124
)
(53
)
(441
)
Total provision for loan losses
$
1,746

$
1,582

$
5,022

$
4,852

Other, net (see table below)
(86
)
(368
)
(344
)
(1,680
)
Allowance for loan losses at end of period
$
12,439

$
13,626

$
12,439

$
13,626

Allowance for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments at beginning of period
$
1,432

$
973

$
1,402

$
1,063

Provision (release) for unfunded lending commitments
(45
)
65

(4
)
(20
)
Other, net
1

(2
)
(10
)
(7
)
Allowance for credit losses on unfunded lending commitments at end of period(3)
$
1,388

$
1,036

$
1,388

$
1,036

Total allowance for loans, leases, and unfunded lending commitments
$
13,827

$
14,662

$
13,827

$
14,662

 
 
 
 
 
Other, net details
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Sales or transfers of various Consumer loan portfolios to held-for-sale
 
 
 
 
Transfer of real estate loan portfolios
$
(50
)
$
(14
)
$
(103
)
$
(329
)
Transfer of other loan portfolios
(8
)
(96
)
(204
)
(901
)
Sales or transfers of various Consumer loan portfolios to held-for-sale
$
(58
)
$
(110
)
$
(307
)
$
(1,230
)
FX translation, Consumer
(46
)
(255
)
(58
)
(439
)
Other, Corporate
18

(3
)
21

(11
)
Other, net
$
(86
)
$
(368
)
$
(344
)
$
(1,680
)

(1)
Recoveries have been reduced by certain collection costs that are incurred only if collection efforts are successful.
(2)
As a result of the entry into an agreement in March 2015 to sell OneMain, OneMain was classified as held-for-sale (HFS) at the end of the first quarter of 2015. As a result of HFS accounting treatment, approximately $160 million and $116 million of net credit losses were recorded as a reduction in revenue (Other revenue) during the second and third quarters of 2015, respectively.
(3)
Represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded lending commitments and letters of credit recorded in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Allowance for Credit Losses and Investment in Loans
 
Three Months Ended
 
September 30, 2016
September 30, 2015
In millions of dollars
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period
$
2,872

$
9,432

$
12,304

$
2,406

$
11,669

$
14,075

Charge-offs
(63
)
(1,885
)
(1,948
)
(78
)
(1,990
)
(2,068
)
Recoveries
23

400

423

28

377

405

Replenishment of net charge-offs
40

1,485

1,525

50

1,613

1,663

Net reserve builds (releases)
(110
)
368

258

116

(73
)
43

Net specific reserve builds (releases)
(1
)
(36
)
(37
)
78

(202
)
(124
)
Other
5

(91
)
(86
)
(4
)
(364
)
(368
)
Ending balance
$
2,766

$
9,673

$
12,439

$
2,596

$
11,030

$
13,626


141



 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30, 2016
September 30, 2015
In millions of dollars
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period
$
2,791

$
9,835

$
12,626

$
2,447

$
13,547

$
15,994

Charge-offs
(445
)
(5,694
)
(6,139
)
(230
)
(6,631
)
(6,861
)
Recoveries
52

1,222

1,274

80

1,241

1,321

Replenishment of net charge-offs
393

4,472

4,865

150

5,390

5,540

Net reserve builds (releases)
(122
)
332

210

196

(443
)
(247
)
Net specific reserve builds (releases)
89

(142
)
(53
)
(38
)
(403
)
(441
)
Other
8

(352
)
(344
)
(9
)
(1,671
)
(1,680
)
Ending balance
$
2,766

$
9,673

$
12,439

$
2,596

$
11,030

$
13,626


 
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Corporate
Consumer
Total
Allowance for loan losses
 

 

 

 
 
 
Determined in accordance with ASC 450
$
2,285

$
7,960

$
10,245

$
2,408

$
7,776

$
10,184

Determined in accordance with ASC 310-10-35
481

1,707

2,188

380

2,046

2,426

Determined in accordance with ASC 310-30

6

6

3

13

16

Total allowance for loan losses
$
2,766

$
9,673

$
12,439

$
2,791

$
9,835

$
12,626

Loans, net of unearned income
 
 
 
 
 


Loans collectively evaluated for impairment in accordance with ASC 450
$
303,179

$
319,953

$
623,132

$
285,053

$
315,314

$
600,367

Loans individually evaluated for impairment in accordance with ASC 310-10-35
2,615

8,524

11,139

1,803

10,192

11,995

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality in accordance with ASC 310-30

194

194

5

245

250

Loans held at fair value
3,939

31

3,970

4,971

34

5,005

Total loans, net of unearned income
$
309,733

$
328,702

$
638,435

$
291,832

$
325,785

$
617,617







142



15.   GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
For additional information regarding Citi’s goodwill impairment testing process, see Notes 1 and 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Goodwill
The changes in Goodwill were as follows:
In millions of dollars
 
Balance, December 31, 2015
$
22,349

Foreign exchange translation and other
239

Divestitures
(13
)
Balance at March 31, 2016
$
22,575

Foreign exchange translation and other
(79
)
Balance at June 30, 2016
$
22,496

Foreign exchange translation and other

$
43

Balance at September 30, 2016

$
22,539


For additional information on transfers of Goodwill balances between reporting units, see Note 16 in Citi’s First Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q. There were no other triggering events during the second and third quarters of 2016.
The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test as of July 1, 2016. The fair values of the Company’s reporting units exceeded their carrying values and did not indicate a risk of impairment.
The following table shows reporting units with goodwill balances as of September 30, 2016 and the fair value as a percentage of allocated book value as of the annual impairment test:
In millions of dollars
 
 
Reporting unit(1)(2)
Goodwill
Fair value as a % of allocated book value

North America Global Consumer Banking
$
6,763

148
%
Asia Global Consumer Banking (3)
5,092

157

Latin America Global Consumer Banking (4)
1,142

180

ICG—Banking
2,791

194

ICG—Markets and Securities Services
6,671

115

Citi HoldingsConsumer Latin America
80

127

Total as of September 30, 2016
$
22,539




(1)
Citi Holdings—Other and Citi Holdings—ICG are excluded from the table as there is no goodwill allocated to them.
(2)
Citi Holdings—Consumer EMEA, is excluded from the table as the entire reporting unit, together with allocated goodwill, is classified as held-for-sale as of September 30, 2016.
(3)
Asia Global Consumer Banking includes the consumer businesses in UK, Russia, Poland, UAE and Bahrain beginning in the first quarter of 2016.
(4)
Latin America Global Consumer Banking contains only the consumer business in Mexico beginning in the first quarter of 2016.





143



Intangible Assets
The components of intangible assets were as follows:
 
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Gross
carrying
amount
Accumulated
amortization
Net
carrying
amount
Gross
carrying
amount
Accumulated
amortization
Net
carrying
amount
Purchased credit card relationships
$
8,396

$
6,596

$
1,800

$
7,606

$
6,520

$
1,086

Credit card contract related intangibles
5,255

2,249

3,006

3,922

2,021

1,901

Core deposit intangibles
854

811

43

1,050

969

81

Other customer relationships
536

298

238

471

252

219

Present value of future profits
33

28

5

37

31

6

Indefinite-lived intangible assets
228


228

284


284

Other
515

477

38

737

593

144

Intangible assets (excluding MSRs)
$
15,817

$
10,459

$
5,358

$
14,107

$
10,386

$
3,721

Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)
1,270


1,270

1,781


1,781

Total intangible assets
$
17,087

$
10,459

$
6,628

$
15,888

$
10,386

$
5,502


 


The changes in intangible assets were as follows:
 
Net carrying
amount at
 
 
 
 
Net carrying
amount at
In millions of dollars
December 31, 2015
Acquisitions/
divestitures (1)
Amortization
Impairments
FX translation and other
September 30,
2016
Purchased credit card relationships
$
1,086

$
848

$
(149
)
$

$
15

$
1,800

Credit card contract related intangibles
1,901

1,314

(227
)

18

3,006

Core deposit intangibles
81

(13
)
(22
)

(3
)
43

Other customer relationships
219


(19
)

38

238

Present value of future profits
6




(1
)
5

Indefinite-lived intangible assets
284

(18
)

(1
)
(37
)
228

Other
144

(106
)
(7
)

7

38

Intangible assets (excluding MSRs)
$
3,721

$
2,025

$
(424
)
$
(1
)
$
37

$
5,358

Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)(2)
1,781

 
 
 
 
1,270

Total intangible assets
$
5,502

 
 
 
 
$
6,628

(1)
Reflects the recognition during the second quarter of 2016 of additional purchased credit card relationships and contract-related intangible assets as a result of the acquisition of the Costco cards portfolio, as well as the renewal and extension of the co-branded credit card program agreement with American Airlines.
(2)
For additional information on Citi’s MSRs, including the roll-forward for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.



144



16.   DEBT
For additional information regarding Citi’s short-term borrowings and long-term debt, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Short-Term Borrowings
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
 
Balance
Balance
Commercial paper
$
10,109

$
9,995

Other borrowings(1)
19,418

11,084

Total
$
29,527

$
21,079


(1)
Includes borrowings from Federal Home Loan Banks and other market participants. At September 30, 2016, collateralized short-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Banks were $10.0 billion. At December 31, 2015, no amounts were outstanding.

 

Long-Term Debt
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2016
December 31, 2015
Citigroup Inc.(1)
$
149,042

$
142,157

Bank(2)
51,688

55,131

Broker-dealer(3)
8,321

3,987

Total
$
209,051

$
201,275


(1)
Represents the parent holding company.
(2)
Represents Citibank entities as well as other bank entities. At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, collateralized long-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Banks were $21.6 billion and $17.8 billion, respectively.
(3)
Represents broker-dealer subsidiaries that are consolidated into Citigroup Inc., the parent holding company.

Long-term debt outstanding includes trust preferred securities with a balance sheet carrying value of $1.7 billion at both September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.



The following table presents Citi’s outstanding trust preferred securities at September 30, 2016:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Junior subordinated debentures owned by trust
Trust
Issuance
date
Securities
issued
Liquidation
value(1)
Coupon
rate(2)
Common
shares
issued
to parent
Amount
Maturity
Redeemable
by issuer
beginning
 In millions of dollars, except share amounts









Citigroup Capital III
Dec. 1996
194,053

$
194

7.625
%
6,003

$
200

Dec. 1, 2036
Not redeemable
Citigroup Capital XIII
Sept. 2010
89,840,000

2,246

3 mo LIBOR + 637 bps

1,000

2,246

Oct. 30, 2040
Oct. 30, 2015
Citigroup Capital XVIII
June 2007
99,901

130

6.829

50

130

June 28, 2067
June 28, 2017
Total obligated
 
 

$
2,570

 
 
$
2,576

 
 

Note: Distributions on the trust preferred securities and interest on the subordinated debentures are payable semiannually for Citigroup Capital III and Citigroup Capital XVIII and quarterly for Citigroup Capital XIII.
(1)
Represents the notional value received by investors from the trusts at the time of issuance.
(2)
In each case, the coupon rate on the subordinated debentures is the same as that on the trust preferred securities.

145



17.   CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Changes in each component of Citigroup’s Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Net
unrealized
gains (losses)
on investment securities
Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)(1)
Cash flow hedges(2)
Benefit plans(3)
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustment (CTA), net of hedges
(4)
Accumulated
other
comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, June 30, 2016
$
2,054

$
190

$
(149
)
$
(5,608
)
$
(22,602
)
$
(26,115
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
(270
)
(197
)
(136
)
(28
)
(375
)
(1,006
)
Increase (decrease) due to amounts reclassified from AOCI
(162
)
(3
)
53

40


(72
)
Change, net of taxes
$
(432
)
$
(200
)
$
(83
)
$
12

$
(375
)
$
(1,078
)
Balance at September 30, 2016
$
1,622

$
(10
)
$
(232
)
$
(5,596
)
$
(22,977
)
$
(27,193
)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016:
Balance, December 31, 2015
$
(907
)
$

$
(617
)
$
(5,116
)
$
(22,704
)
$
(29,344
)
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)

(15
)



(15
)
Adjusted balance, beginning of period
$
(907
)
$
(15
)
$
(617
)
$
(5,116
)
$
(22,704
)
$
(29,359
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
2,781

11

270

(594
)
(273
)
2,195

Increase (decrease) due to amounts reclassified from AOCI
(252
)
(6
)
115

114


(29
)
Change, net of taxes 
$
2,529

$
5

$
385

$
(480
)
$
(273
)
$
2,166

Balance at September 30, 2016
$
1,622

$
(10
)
$
(232
)
$
(5,596
)
$
(22,977
)
$
(27,193
)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
In millions of dollars
Net
unrealized
gains (losses)
on investment securities
Cash flow hedges(2)
Benefit plans(3)
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustment (CTA), net of hedges
(4)
Accumulated
other
comprehensive income (loss)
Balance, June 30, 2015
$
(287
)
$
(731
)
$
(4,671
)
$
(19,415
)
$
(25,104
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
556

149

(400
)
(2,493
)
(2,188
)
Increase (decrease) due to amounts reclassified from AOCI
(45
)
40

40


35

Change, net of taxes 
$
511

$
189

$
(360
)
$
(2,493
)
$
(2,153
)
Balance, September 30, 2015
$
224

$
(542
)
$
(5,031
)
$
(21,908
)
$
(27,257
)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015:
Balance, December 31, 2014
$
57

$
(909
)
$
(5,159
)
$
(17,205
)
$
(23,216
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
453

203

7

(4,703
)
(4,040
)
Increase (decrease) due to amounts reclassified from
  AOCI
(286
)
164

121


(1
)
Change, net of taxes
$
167

$
367

$
128

$
(4,703
)
$
(4,041
)
Balance, September 30, 2015
$
224

$
(542
)
$
(5,031
)
$
(21,908
)
$
(27,257
)

146



(1)
Beginning in the first quarter of 2016, changes in DVA are reflected as a component of AOCI, pursuant to the adoption of only the provisions of ASU 2016-01 relating to the presentation of DVA on fair value option liabilities. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding this change.
(2)
Primarily driven by Citigroup’s pay fixed/receive floating interest rate swap programs that hedge the floating rates on liabilities.
(3)
Primarily reflects adjustments based on the quarterly actuarial valuations of the Company’s significant pension and postretirement plans, annual actuarial valuations of all other plans, and amortization of amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income.
(4)
Primarily reflects the movements in (by order of impact) the Mexican peso, Korean Won, Japanese Yen, and Australian Dollar against the U.S. dollar, and changes in related tax effects and hedges for the quarter ended September 30, 2016. Primarily reflects the movements in (by order of impact) the Mexican peso, Japanese Yen, Brazilian Real and Korean Won against the U.S. dollar, and changes in related tax effects and hedges for nine months ended September 30, 2016. Primarily reflects the movements in (by order of impact) the Mexican peso, Brazilian real, Korean won and British pound against the U.S. dollar, and changes in related tax effects and hedges for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. Primarily reflects the movements in (by order of impact) the Mexican peso, Brazilian real, Korean won and Australian dollar against the U.S. dollar, and changes in related tax effects and hedges for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

The pretax and after-tax changes in each component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Pretax
Tax effect
After-tax
Balance, June 30, 2016
$
(33,714
)
$
7,599

$
(26,115
)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities
(686
)
254

(432
)
Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)
(319
)
119

(200
)
Cash flow hedges
(131
)
48

(83
)
Benefit plans
11

1

12

Foreign currency translation adjustment
(313
)
(62
)
(375
)
Change
$
(1,438
)
$
360

$
(1,078
)
Balance, September 30, 2016
$
(35,152
)
$
7,959

$
(27,193
)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Pretax
Tax effect
After-tax
Balance, December 31, 2015
$
(38,440
)
$
9,096

$
(29,344
)
Adjustment to opening balance (1)
(26
)
11

(15
)
Adjusted balance, beginning of period
$
(38,466
)
$
9,107

$
(29,359
)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities
4,020

(1,491
)
2,529

Debt valuation adjustment (DVA)
8

(3
)
5

Cash flow hedges
607

(222
)
385

Benefit plans
(747
)
267

(480
)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(574
)
301

(273
)
Change
$
3,314

$
(1,148
)
$
2,166

Balance, September 30, 2016
$
(35,152
)
$
7,959

$
(27,193
)
(1)
Represents the ($15) million adjustment related to the initial adoption of ASU 2016-01. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


147



Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
In millions of dollars
Pretax
Tax effect
After-tax
Balance, June 30, 2015
$
(33,148
)
$
8,044

$
(25,104
)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities
821

(310
)
511

Cash flow hedges
322

(133
)
189

Benefit plans
(545
)
185

(360
)
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(2,792
)
299

(2,493
)
Change
$
(2,194
)
$
41

$
(2,153
)
Balance, June 30, 2015
$
(35,342
)
$
8,085

$
(27,257
)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
In millions of dollars
Pretax
Tax effect
After-tax
Balance, December 31, 2014
$
(31,060
)
$
7,844

$
(23,216
)
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities
353

(186
)
167

Cash flow hedges
596

(229
)
367

Benefit plans
144

(16
)
128

Foreign currency translation adjustment
(5,375
)
672

(4,703
)
Change
$
(4,282
)
$
241

$
(4,041
)
Balance, September 30, 2015
$
(35,342
)
$
8,085

$
(27,257
)

148



The Company recognized pretax gain (loss) related to amounts in AOCI reclassified in the Consolidated Statement of Income as follows:
 
Increase (decrease) in AOCI due to amounts reclassified to Consolidated Statement of Income
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2016
Realized (gains) losses on sales of investments
$
(287
)
$
(673
)
OTTI gross impairment losses
32

283

Subtotal, pretax
$
(255
)
$
(390
)
Tax effect
93

138

Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities, after-tax(1)
$
(162
)
$
(252
)
Realized DVA (gains) losses on fair value option liabilities
$
(5
)
$
(10
)
Subtotal, pretax
$
(5
)
$
(10
)
Tax effect
2

4

Net realized debt valuation adjustment, after-tax
$
(3
)
$
(6
)
Interest rate contracts
$
39

$
96

Foreign exchange contracts
46

89

Subtotal, pretax
$
85

$
185

Tax effect
(32
)
(70
)
Amortization of cash flow hedges, after-tax(2)
$
53

$
115

Amortization of unrecognized
 
 
Prior service cost (benefit)
$
(10
)
$
(31
)
Net actuarial loss
73

208

Curtailment/settlement impact(3)
8

9

Subtotal, pretax
$
71

$
186

Tax effect
(31
)
(72
)
Amortization of benefit plans, after-tax(3)
$
40

$
114

Foreign currency translation adjustment
$

$

Total amounts reclassified out of AOCI, pretax
$
(104
)
$
(29
)
Total tax effect
32


Total amounts reclassified out of AOCI, after-tax
$
(72
)
$
(29
)
(1)
The pretax amount is reclassified to Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments, net and Gross impairment losses on the Consolidated Statement of Income. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
(2)
See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
(3)
See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.





















149



The Company recognized pretax gain (loss) related to amounts in AOCI reclassified in the Consolidated Statement of Income as follows:
 
Increase (decrease) in AOCI due to amounts reclassified to Consolidated Statement of Income
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2015
2015
Realized (gains) losses on sales of investments
$
(151
)
$
(641
)
OTTI gross impairment losses
80

195

Subtotal, pretax
$
(71
)
$
(446
)
Tax effect
26

160

Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities, after-tax(1)
$
(45
)
$
(286
)
Interest rate contracts
$
28

$
148

Foreign exchange contracts
35

112

Subtotal, pretax
$
63

$
260

Tax effect
(23
)
(96
)
Amortization of cash flow hedges, after-tax(2)
$
40

$
164

Amortization of unrecognized
 
 
Prior service cost (benefit)
$
(11
)
$
(32
)
Net actuarial loss
64

211

Curtailment/settlement impact(3)
2

12

Subtotal, pretax
$
55

$
191

Tax effect
(15
)
(70
)
Amortization of benefit plans, after-tax(3)
$
40

$
121

Foreign currency translation adjustment
$

$

Total amounts reclassified out of AOCI, pretax
$
47

$
5

Total tax effect
(12
)
(6
)
Total amounts reclassified out of AOCI, after-tax
$
35

$
(1
)

(1)
The pretax amount is reclassified to Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments, net and Gross impairment losses on the Consolidated Statement of Income. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
(2)
See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
(3)
See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.


150



18. SECURITIZATIONS AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
 
For additional information regarding Citi’s use of special purpose entities (SPEs) and variable interest entities (VIEs), see Notes 22 and 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K and First Quarter of 2016 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, respectively.

Citigroup’s involvement with consolidated and unconsolidated VIEs with which the Company holds significant variable interests or has continuing involvement through servicing a majority of the assets in a VIE is presented below:
 
As of September 30, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs(1)
 
 
 
 
Funded exposures(2)
Unfunded exposures
 
In millions of dollars
Total
involvement
with SPE
assets
Consolidated
VIE / SPE assets
Significant
unconsolidated
VIE assets(3)
Debt
investments
Equity
investments
Funding
commitments
Guarantees
and
derivatives
Total
Credit card securitizations
$
50,416

$
50,416

$

$

$

$

$

$

Mortgage securitizations(4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. agency-sponsored
217,482


217,482

3,678



82

3,760

Non-agency-sponsored
15,257

1,244

14,013

232

38


1

271

Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)
20,324

20,324







Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)
18,592


18,592

4,752



83

4,835

Asset-based financing
58,084

1,231

56,853

19,508

456

5,193

437

25,594

Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)
7,289

2,980

4,309

161


2,672


2,833

Municipal investments
17,371

17

17,354

2,306

3,272

2,321


7,899

Client intermediation
517

337

180

53




53

Investment funds
2,744

788

1,956

35

156

59

3

253

Other
1,346

619

727

149


119

45

313

Total(5)
$
409,422

$
77,956

$
331,466

$
30,874

$
3,922

$
10,364

$
651

$
45,811

 
As of December 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs(1)
 
 
 
 
Funded exposures(2)
Unfunded exposures
 
In millions of dollars
Total
involvement
with SPE
assets
Consolidated
VIE / SPE assets
Significant
unconsolidated
VIE assets(3)
Debt
investments
Equity
investments
Funding
commitments
Guarantees
and
derivatives
Total
Credit card securitizations
$
54,916

$
54,916

$

$

$

$

$

$

Mortgage securitizations(4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. agency-sponsored
217,291


217,291

3,571



95

3,666

Non-agency-sponsored
13,036

1,586

11,450

527



1

528

Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)
21,280

21,280







Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)
16,719


16,719

3,150



86

3,236

Asset-based financing
58,862

1,364

57,498

21,270

269

3,616

436

25,591

Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)
8,572

3,830

4,742

2


3,100


3,102

Municipal investments
20,290

44

20,246

2,196

2,487

2,335


7,018

Client intermediation
434

335

99

49




49

Investment funds
1,730

842

888

13

138

102


253

Other
4,915

597

4,318

292

554


52

898

Total(5)
$
418,045

$
84,794

$
333,251

$
31,070

$
3,448

$
9,153

$
670

$
44,341


Note: Certain adjustments have been made to the December 31, 2015 information to conform to the current period’s presentation.
(1)    The definition of maximum exposure to loss is included in the text that follows this table.
(2)
Included on Citigroup’s September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

151



(3)
A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity where the Company has any variable interest or continuing involvement considered to be significant, regardless of the likelihood of loss.
(4)
Citigroup mortgage securitizations also include agency and non-agency (private-label) re-securitization activities. These SPEs are not consolidated. See “Re-securitizations” below for further discussion.
(5)
Citi’s total involvement with Citicorp SPE assets was $390.9 billion and $383.2 billion as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, with the remainder related to Citi Holdings.


The previous tables do not include:

certain venture capital investments made by some of the Company’s private equity subsidiaries, as the Company accounts for these investments in accordance with the Investment Company Audit Guide (codified in ASC 946);
certain investment funds for which the Company provides investment management services and personal estate trusts for which the Company provides administrative, trustee and/or investment management services;
certain VIEs structured by third parties where the Company holds securities in inventory, as these investments are made on arm’s-length terms;
certain positions in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities held by the Company, which are classified as Trading account assets or Investments, where the Company has no other involvement with the related securitization entity deemed to be significant (for more information on these positions, see Notes 20 and 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements);
certain representations and warranties exposures in legacy ICG-sponsored mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations, where the Company has no variable interest or continuing involvement as servicer. The outstanding balance of mortgage loans securitized during 2005 to 2008 where the Company has no variable interest or continuing involvement as servicer was approximately $10 billion and $12 billion at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively;
certain representations and warranties exposures in Citigroup residential mortgage securitizations, where the original mortgage loan balances are no longer outstanding; and
VIEs such as trust preferred securities trusts used in connection with the Company’s funding activities. The Company does not have a variable interest in these trusts.

 

The asset balances for consolidated VIEs represent the carrying amounts of the assets consolidated by the Company. The carrying amount may represent the amortized cost or the current fair value of the assets depending on the legal form of the asset (e.g., loan or security) and the Company’s standard accounting policies for the asset type and line of business.
The asset balances for unconsolidated VIEs where the Company has significant involvement represent the most current information available to the Company. In most cases, the asset balances represent an amortized cost basis without regard to impairments, unless fair value information is readily available to the Company. For VIEs that obtain asset exposures synthetically through derivative instruments, the tables generally include the full original notional amount of the derivative as an asset balance.
The maximum funded exposure represents the balance sheet carrying amount of the Company’s investment in the VIE. It reflects the initial amount of cash invested in the VIE adjusted for any accrued interest and cash principal payments received. The carrying amount may also be adjusted for increases or declines in fair value or any impairment in value recognized in earnings. The maximum exposure of unfunded positions represents the remaining undrawn committed amount, including liquidity and credit facilities provided by the Company, or the notional amount of a derivative instrument considered to be a variable interest. In certain transactions, the Company has entered into derivative instruments or other arrangements that are not considered variable interests in the VIE (e.g., interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps, or where the Company is the purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Company pays the total return on certain assets to the SPE). Receivables under such arrangements are not included in the maximum exposure amounts.


152



Funding Commitments for Significant Unconsolidated VIEs—Liquidity Facilities and Loan Commitments
The following table presents the notional amount of liquidity facilities and loan commitments that are classified as funding commitments in the VIE tables above:
 
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Liquidity
facilities
Loan / equity
commitments
Liquidity
facilities
Loan / equity
commitments
Asset-based financing
$
5

$
5,188

$
5

$
3,611

Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)
2,672


3,100


Municipal investments

2,321


2,335

Investment funds

59


102

Other

119



Total funding commitments
$
2,677

$
7,687

$
3,105

$
6,048

Significant Interests in Unconsolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification
The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of significant variable interests in unconsolidated VIEs:
In billions of dollars
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
Cash
$
0.1

$
0.1

Trading account assets
7.6

6.2

Investments
4.1

3.0

Total loans, net of allowance
21.8

23.6

Other
1.2

1.7

Total assets
$
34.8

$
34.6

Credit Card Securitizations
Substantially all of the Company’s credit card securitization activity is through two trusts—Citibank Credit Card Master Trust (Master Trust) and the Citibank Omni Master Trust
 
(Omni Trust), with the substantial majority through the Master Trust. These trusts are consolidated entities.
The following table reflects amounts related to the Company’s securitized credit card receivables:

In billions of dollars
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
Ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables
   Sold to investors via trust-issued securities
$
23.4

$
29.7

   Retained by Citigroup as trust-issued securities
7.8

9.4

   Retained by Citigroup via non-certificated interests
18.7

16.5

Total
$
49.9

$
55.6


The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to Citigroup’s credit card securitizations:
 
Three months ended September 30,
In billions of dollars
2016
2015
Proceeds from new securitizations
$

$

Pay down of maturing notes
(2.8
)
(0.7
)
 
Nine months ended September 30,
In billions of dollars
2016
2015
Proceeds from new securitizations
$

$

Pay down of maturing notes
(6.3
)
(6.5
)

The weighted average maturity of the third-party term notes issued by the Master Trust was 2.2 years as of September 30, 2016 and 2.4 years as of December 31, 2015.



 

Master Trust Liabilities (at Par Value)
In billions of dollars
September 30, 2016
Dec. 31, 2015
Term notes issued to third parties
$
22.1

$
28.4

Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates
5.9

7.5

Total Master Trust liabilities
$
28.0

$
35.9


The weighted average maturity of the third-party term notes issued by the Omni Trust was 0.1 years as of September 30, 2016 and 0.9 years as of December 31, 2015.

Omni Trust Liabilities (at Par Value)
In billions of dollars
September 30, 2016
Dec. 31, 2015
Term notes issued to third parties
$
1.3

$
1.3

Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates
1.9

1.9

Total Omni Trust liabilities
$
3.2

$
3.2



153



Mortgage Securitizations

The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to Citigroup mortgage securitizations:
 
Three months ended September 30,
 
2016
2015
In billions of dollars
U.S. agency-
sponsored
mortgages
Non-agency-
sponsored
mortgages
U.S. agency-
sponsored
mortgages
Non-agency-
sponsored
mortgages
Proceeds from new securitizations
$
11.7

$
1.4

$
6.8

$
3.1

Contractual servicing fees received
0.1


0.1


 
Nine months ended September 30,
 
2016
2015
In billions of dollars
U.S. agency-
sponsored
mortgages
Non-agency-
sponsored
mortgages
U.S. agency-
sponsored
mortgages
Non-agency-
sponsored
mortgages
Proceeds from new securitizations(1)
$
32.5

$
8.0

$
19.8

$
9.2

Contractual servicing fees received
0.3


0.4



(1) The proceeds from new securitizations in 2016 include $0.5 billion related to personal loan securitizations.

Gains recognized on the securitization of U.S. agency-sponsored mortgages were $36 million and $81 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, gains recognized on the securitization of non-agency sponsored mortgages were $37 million and $65 million, respectively.


 
Gains recognized on the securitization of U.S. agency-sponsored mortgages were $25 million and $115 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, gains recognized on the securitization of non-agency sponsored mortgages were $7 million and $38 million, respectively.


Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization of mortgage receivables were as follows:
 
Three months ended September 30, 2016
 
 
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
 
U.S. agency- 
sponsored mortgages
Senior 
interests
Subordinated 
interests
Discount rate
1.5% to 13.0%



   Weighted average discount rate
10.0
%


Constant prepayment rate
7.7% to 30.9%



   Weighted average constant prepayment rate
13.7
%


Anticipated net credit losses(2)
   NM



   Weighted average anticipated net credit losses
   NM



Weighted average life
2.0 to 9.8 years




Note: Citi held no retained interests in non-agency-sponsored mortgages securitized during the third quarter of 2016.

154



 
Three months ended September 30, 2015
 
 
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
 
U.S. agency-
sponsored mortgages
Senior
interests
Subordinated
interests
Discount rate
2.3% to 10.7%

3.2
%
   Weighted average discount rate
8.1
%
3.2
%
Constant prepayment rate
8.4% to 16.6%


   Weighted average constant prepayment rate
11.8
%

Anticipated net credit losses(2)
   NM

40.0
%
   Weighted average anticipated net credit losses
   NM

40.0
%
Weighted average life
6.3 to 9.3 years

9.8 years

 
Nine months ended September 30, 2016
 
 
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
 
U.S. agency-
sponsored mortgages
Senior
interests
Subordinated
interests
Discount rate
0.8% to 13.0%



   Weighted average discount rate
9.1
%


Constant prepayment rate
7.7% to 30.9%



   Weighted average constant prepayment rate
12.8
%


Anticipated net credit losses(2)
   NM



   Weighted average anticipated net credit losses
   NM



Weighted average life
0.5 to 17.5 years




Note: Citi held no retained interests in non-agency-sponsored mortgages securitized during 2016.
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2015
 
 
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
 
U.S. agency-
sponsored mortgages
Senior
interests
Subordinated
interests
Discount rate
0.0% to 10.7%

2.8% to 3.2%

4.4% to 12.1%

   Weighted average discount rate
6.4
%
2.9
%
7.2
%
Constant prepayment rate
5.7% to 34.9%

0.0
%
3.3% to 8.0%

   Weighted average constant prepayment rate
12.6
%
0.0
%
4.2
%
Anticipated net credit losses(2)
   NM

40.0
%
38.1% to 55.9%

   Weighted average anticipated net credit losses
   NM

40.0
%
52.0
%
Weighted average life
3.5 to 12.8 years

9.7 to 9.8 years

0.0 to 12.9 years


(1)
Disclosure of non-agency-sponsored mortgages as senior and subordinated interests is indicative of the interests’ position in the capital structure of the securitization.
(2)
Anticipated net credit losses represent estimated loss severity associated with defaulted mortgage loans underlying the mortgage securitizations disclosed above. Anticipated net credit losses, in this instance, do not represent total credit losses incurred to date, nor do they represent credit losses expected on retained interests in mortgage securitizations.
NM
Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.


155



The interests retained by the Company range from highly rated and/or senior in the capital structure to unrated and/or residual interests.
The key assumptions used to value retained interests, and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions, are set forth in the tables
 
below. The negative effect of each change is calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.

 
September 30, 2016
 
 
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
 
U.S. agency- 
sponsored mortgages
Senior 
interests
Subordinated 
interests
Discount rate
   0.3% to 31.3%

   4.8% to 7.8%

   5.2% to 32.7%

   Weighted average discount rate
7.0
%
6.5
%
13.3
%
Constant prepayment rate
7.7% to 36.0%

   4.2% to 9.8%

   0.5% to 37.5%

   Weighted average constant prepayment rate
16.4
%
5.6
%
10.8
%
Anticipated net credit losses(2)
   NM

   51.5% to 85.6%

   8.0% to 94.4%

   Weighted average anticipated net credit losses
   NM

76.1
%
47.5
%
Weighted average life
0.3 to 17.6 years

   6.5 to 16.9 years

   1.2 to 17.6 years

 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
 
U.S. agency- 
sponsored mortgages
Senior 
interests
Subordinated 
interests
Discount rate
   0.0% to 27.0%

   1.6% to 67.6%

   2.0% to 24.9%

   Weighted average discount rate
4.9
%
7.6
%
8.4
%
Constant prepayment rate
5.7% to 27.8%

   4.2% to 100.0%

   0.5% to 20.8%

   Weighted average constant prepayment rate
12.3
%
14.0
%
7.5
%
Anticipated net credit losses(2)
   NM

   0.2% to 89.1%

   3.8% to 92.0%

   Weighted average anticipated net credit losses
   NM

48.9
%
54.4
%
Weighted average life
1.3 to 21.0 years

   0.3 to 18.1 years

   0.9 to 19.0 years


(1)
Disclosure of non-agency-sponsored mortgages as senior and subordinated interests is indicative of the interests’ position in the capital structure of the securitization.
(2)
Anticipated net credit losses represent estimated loss severity associated with defaulted mortgage loans underlying the mortgage securitizations disclosed above. Anticipated net credit losses, in this instance, do not represent total credit losses incurred to date, nor do they represent credit losses expected on retained interests in mortgage securitizations.
NM
Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.

156



 
September 30, 2016
 
 
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
In millions of dollars
U.S. agency- 
sponsored mortgages
Senior 
interests
Subordinated 
interests
Carrying value of retained interests
$
2,261

$
20

$
166

Discount rates
 
 
 
   Adverse change of 10%
$
(54
)
$
(6
)
$
(8
)
   Adverse change of 20%
(105
)
(12
)
(16
)
Constant prepayment rate
 
 
 
   Adverse change of 10%
(91
)
(1
)
(4
)
   Adverse change of 20%
(189
)
(3
)
(9
)
Anticipated net credit losses
 
 
 
   Adverse change of 10%
NM

(6
)
(2
)
   Adverse change of 20%
NM

(12
)
(3
)


 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Non-agency-sponsored mortgages(1)
In millions of dollars
U.S. agency- 
sponsored mortgages
Senior 
interests
Subordinated 
interests
Carrying value of retained interests
$
3,546

$
179

$
533

Discount rates
 
 
 
   Adverse change of 10%
$
(79
)
$
(8
)
$
(25
)
   Adverse change of 20%
(155
)
(15
)
(49
)
Constant prepayment rate
 
 
 
   Adverse change of 10%
(111
)
(3
)
(9
)
   Adverse change of 20%
(213
)
(6
)
(18
)
Anticipated net credit losses
 
 
 
   Adverse change of 10%
NM

(6
)
(7
)
   Adverse change of 20%
NM

(11
)
(14
)

Note: There were no subordinated interests in mortgage securitizations in Citi Holdings as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
(1)
Disclosure of non-agency-sponsored mortgages as senior and subordinated interests is indicative of the interests’ position in the capital structure of the securitization.
NM
Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.

Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs)
The fair value of Citi’s capitalized MSRs was $1.3 billion and $1.8 billion at September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The MSRs correspond to principal loan balances of $173 billion and $203 billion as of September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The following tables summarize the changes in capitalized MSRs:
 
Three months ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
Balance, as of June 30
$
1,324

$
1,924

Originations
43

57

Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions
13

(140
)
Other changes(1)
(78
)
(79
)
Sale of MSRs(2)
(32
)
4

Balance, as of September 30
$
1,270

$
1,766

 
 
Nine months ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
Balance, beginning of year
$
1,781

$
1,845

Originations
111

168

Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions
(349
)
51

Other changes(1)
(255
)
(261
)
Sale of MSRs(2)
(18
)
(37
)
Balance, as of September 30
$
1,270

$
1,766




(1)
Represents changes due to customer payments and passage of time.
(2)
Amount includes sales of credit challenged MSRs for which Citi paid the new servicer.



157



The Company receives fees during the course of servicing previously securitized mortgages. The amounts of these fees were as follows:
 
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Servicing fees
$
117

$
135

$
371

$
416

Late fees
3

4

11

12

Ancillary fees
4

6

13

28

Total MSR fees
$
124

$
145

$
395

$
456


In the Consolidated Statement of Income these fees are primarily classified as Commissions and fees, and changes in MSR fair values are classified as Other revenue.

Re-securitizations
The Company engages in re-securitization transactions in which debt securities are transferred to a VIE in exchange for new beneficial interests. Citi did not transfer non-agency (private-label) securities to re-securitization entities during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, Citi transferred non-agency (private-label) securities with an original par value of $141 million and $790 million, respectively, to re-securitization entities. These securities are backed by either residential or commercial mortgages and are often structured on behalf of clients.
As of September 30, 2016, the fair value of Citi-retained interests in private-label re-securitization transactions structured by Citi totaled approximately $133 million (all related to re-securitization transactions executed prior to 2016), which has been recorded in Trading account assets. Of this amount, substantially all was related to subordinated beneficial interests. As of December 31, 2015, the fair value of Citi-retained interests in private-label re-securitization transactions structured by Citi totaled approximately $428 million (including $132 million related to re-securitization transactions executed in 2015). Of this amount, approximately $18 million was related to senior beneficial interests, and approximately $410 million was related to subordinated beneficial interests. The original par value of private-label re-securitization transactions in which Citi holds a retained interest as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was approximately $1.5 billion and $3.7 billion, respectively.
The Company also re-securitizes U.S. government-agency guaranteed mortgage-backed (agency) securities. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, Citi transferred agency securities with a fair value of approximately $7.1 billion and $21.3 billion, respectively, to re-securitization entities compared to approximately $3.5 billion and $12.4 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.
As of September 30, 2016, the fair value of Citi-retained interests in agency re-securitization transactions structured by Citi totaled approximately $2.4 billion (including $670 million related to re-securitization transactions executed in 2016) compared to $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2015 (including $1.5 billion related to re-securitization transactions executed in 2015), which is recorded in Trading account assets. The original fair value of agency re-securitization transactions in
 
which Citi holds a retained interest as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was approximately $69.9 billion and $65.0 billion, respectively.
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company did not consolidate any private-label or agency re-securitization entities.

Citi-Administered Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Conduits
At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the commercial paper conduits administered by Citi had approximately $20.3 billion and $21.3 billion of purchased assets outstanding, respectively, and had incremental funding commitments with clients of approximately $13.5 billion and $11.6 billion, respectively.
Substantially all of the funding of the conduits is in the form of short-term commercial paper. At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the weighted average remaining lives of the commercial paper issued by the conduits were approximately 60 and 56 days, respectively.
The primary credit enhancement provided to the conduit investors is in the form of transaction-specific credit enhancements described above. In addition to the transaction-specific credit enhancements, the conduits, other than the government guaranteed loan conduit, have obtained a letter of credit from the Company, which is equal to at least 8% to 10% of the conduit’s assets with a minimum of $200 million. The letters of credit provided by the Company to the conduits total approximately $1.8 billion as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The net result across multi-seller conduits administered by the Company, other than the government guaranteed loan conduit, is that, in the event defaulted assets exceed the transaction-specific credit enhancements described above, any losses in each conduit are allocated first to the Company and then the commercial paper investors.
At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company owned $10.2 billion and $11.4 billion, respectively, of the commercial paper issued by its administered conduits. The Company's investments were not driven by market illiquidity and the Company is not obligated under any agreement to purchase the commercial paper issued by the conduits.

Collateralized Loan Obligations
Key Assumptions and Retained Interests
The key assumptions used to value retained interests in CLOs, and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% are set forth in the tables below:

Sept. 30, 2016
Dec. 31, 2015
Discount rate
   1.1% to 1.5%
1.4% to 49.6%
In millions of dollars
Sept. 30, 2016
Dec. 31, 2015
Carrying value of retained interests
$
909

$
918

Discount rates
 
 
   Adverse change of 10%
$
(4
)
$
(5
)
   Adverse change of 20%
(9
)
(10
)



158



Asset-Based Financing
The primary types of Citi’s asset-based financings, total assets of the unconsolidated VIEs with significant involvement, and Citi’s maximum exposure to loss are shown below. For Citi to realize the maximum loss, the VIE (borrower) would have to default with no recovery from the assets held by the VIE.
 
September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Total 
unconsolidated 
VIE assets
Maximum 
exposure to 
unconsolidated VIEs
Type
 
 
Commercial and other real estate
$
12,608

$
4,811

Corporate loans
1,082

2,381

Hedge funds and equities
374

57

Airplanes, ships and other assets
42,789

18,345

Total
$
56,853

$
25,594

 
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Total 
unconsolidated 
VIE assets
Maximum 
exposure to 
unconsolidated VIEs
Type
 
 
Commercial and other real estate
$
17,459

$
6,528

Corporate loans
1,274

1,871

Hedge funds and equities
385

55

Airplanes, ships and other assets
38,380

17,137

Total
$
57,498

$
25,591


 
Municipal Securities Tender Option Bond (TOB) Trusts
At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company held $193 million and $2 million, respectively, of Floaters related to customer and non-customer TOB trusts.
At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, approximately $82 million of the municipal bonds owned by non-customer TOB trusts are subject to a credit guarantee provided by the Company.
At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, liquidity agreements provided with respect to customer TOB trusts totaled $2.8 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively, of which $2.1 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively, were offset by reimbursement agreements. For the remaining exposure related to TOB transactions, where the Residual owned by the customer was at least 25% of the bond value at the inception of the transaction, no reimbursement agreement was executed.
The Company also provides other liquidity agreements or letters of credit to customer-sponsored municipal investment funds, which are not variable interest entities, and municipality-related issuers that totaled $9.6 billion and $8.1 billion as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. These liquidity agreements and letters of credit are offset by reimbursement agreements with various term-out provisions.

Client Intermediation
The proceeds from new securitizations related to the Company’s client intermediation transactions for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 totaled approximately $0.5 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively, compared to $0.4 billion and $1.2 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.





159



19.   DERIVATIVES ACTIVITIES
In the ordinary course of business, Citigroup enters into various types of derivative transactions. For additional information regarding Citi’s use of and accounting for derivatives, see Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Information pertaining to Citigroup’s derivative activity, based on notional amounts is presented in the table below. Derivative notional amounts are reference amounts from which contractual payments are derived and do not represent a complete and accurate measure of Citi’s exposure to derivative transactions. Rather, Citi’s derivative exposure arises primarily from market fluctuations (i.e., market risk), counterparty failure (i.e., credit risk) and/or periods of high volatility or financial stress (i.e., liquidity risk), as well as any market valuation adjustments that may be required on the transactions. Moreover, notional amounts do not reflect the netting of offsetting trades. For example, if Citi enters into an interest rate swap with $100 million notional, and offsets this risk with an identical but opposite position with a different counterparty, $200 million in derivative notionals is reported, although these offsetting positions may result in de minimis overall market risk. Aggregate derivative notional amounts can fluctuate from period to period in the normal course of business based on Citi’s market share, levels of client activity and other factors.

 




























160



Derivative Notionals
 
Hedging instruments under
ASC 815(1)(2)
Other derivative instruments
 


Trading derivatives
Management hedges(3)
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
Interest rate contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
Swaps
$
213,863

$
166,576

$
20,853,766

$
22,208,794

$
39,537

$
28,969

Futures and forwards
414


6,451,502

6,868,340

34,147

38,421

Written options


3,138,417

3,033,617

4,653

2,606

Purchased options


2,940,738

2,887,605

3,350

4,575

Total interest rate contract notionals
$
214,277

$
166,576

$
33,384,423

$
34,998,356

$
81,687

$
74,571

Foreign exchange contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
Swaps
$
21,410

$
23,007

$
5,954,717

$
4,765,687

$
22,272

$
23,960

Futures, forwards and spot
65,417

72,124

3,410,229

2,563,649

3,080

3,034

Written options

448

1,271,307

1,125,664



Purchased options

819

1,310,990

1,131,816



Total foreign exchange contract notionals
$
86,827

$
96,398

$
11,947,243

$
9,586,816

$
25,352

$
26,994

Equity contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
Swaps
$

$

$
195,000

$
180,963

$

$

Futures and forwards


39,964

33,735



Written options


364,514

298,876



Purchased options


325,200

265,062



Total equity contract notionals
$

$

$
924,678

$
778,636

$

$

Commodity and other contracts
 
 
 
 
 
 
Swaps
$

$

$
61,882

$
70,561

$

$

Futures and forwards
891

789

149,604

106,474



Written options


73,673

72,648



Purchased options


68,829

66,051



Total commodity and other contract notionals
$
891

$
789

$
353,988

$
315,734

$

$

Credit derivatives(4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Protection sold
$

$

$
1,021,118

$
950,922

$

$

Protection purchased


1,051,146

981,586

27,800

23,628

Total credit derivatives
$

$

$
2,072,264

$
1,932,508

$
27,800

$
23,628

Total derivative notionals
$
301,995

$
263,763

$
48,682,596

$
47,612,050

$
134,839

$
125,193

(1)
The notional amounts presented in this table do not include hedge accounting relationships under ASC 815 where Citigroup is hedging the foreign currency risk of a net investment in a foreign operation by issuing a foreign-currency-denominated debt instrument. The notional amount of such debt was $1,991 million and $2,102 million at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
(2)
Derivatives in hedge accounting relationships accounted for under ASC 815 are recorded in either Other assets/Other liabilities or Trading account assets/Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(3)
Management hedges represent derivative instruments used to mitigate certain economic risks, but for which hedge accounting is not applied. These derivatives are recorded in either Other assets/Other liabilities or Trading account assets/Trading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(4)
Credit derivatives are arrangements designed to allow one party (protection buyer) to transfer the credit risk of a “reference asset” to another party (protection seller). These arrangements allow a protection seller to assume the credit risk associated with the reference asset without directly purchasing that asset. The Company enters into credit derivative positions for purposes such as risk management, yield enhancement, reduction of credit concentrations and diversification of overall risk.



161



The following tables present the gross and net fair values of the Company’s derivative transactions, and the related offsetting amounts as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Gross positive fair values are offset against gross negative fair values by counterparty pursuant to enforceable master netting agreements. Under ASC 815-10-45, payables and receivables in respect of cash collateral received from or paid to a given counterparty pursuant to a credit support annex are included in the offsetting amount if a legal opinion supporting enforceability of netting and collateral rights has been obtained. GAAP does not permit similar offsetting for security collateral. The tables also include amounts that are not permitted to be offset, such as security collateral posted or cash collateral posted at third-party custodians, but which would be eligible for offsetting to the extent an event of default occurred and a legal opinion supporting enforceability of the netting and collateral rights has been obtained.


162



Derivative Mark-to-Market (MTM) Receivables/Payables
In millions of dollars at September 30, 2016
Derivatives classified
in Trading account
assets / liabilities(1)(2)(3)
Derivatives classified
in Other
assets / liabilities(2)(3)
Derivatives instruments designated as ASC 815 hedges
Assets
Liabilities
Assets
Liabilities
Over-the-counter
$
773

$
180

$
2,384

$
27

Cleared
6,692

1,730


225

Interest rate contracts
$
7,465

$
1,910

$
2,384

$
252

Over-the-counter
$
1,485

$
1,132

$
45

$
819

Foreign exchange contracts
$
1,485

$
1,132

$
45

$
819

Total derivative instruments designated as ASC 815 hedges
$
8,950

$
3,042

$
2,429

$
1,071

Derivatives instruments not designated as ASC 815 hedges




Over-the-counter
$
336,753

$
313,154

$
209

$

Cleared
175,410

182,785

581

593

Exchange traded
75

56



Interest rate contracts
$
512,238

$
495,995

$
790

$
593

Over-the-counter
$
114,573

$
113,454

$

$
45

Cleared
579

493



Exchange traded
69

56



Foreign exchange contracts
$
115,221

$
114,003

$

$
45

Over-the-counter
$
16,202

$
19,998

$

$

Cleared
876

9



Exchange traded
9,315

9,645



Equity contracts
$
26,393

$
29,652

$

$

Over-the-counter
$
10,757

$
13,271

$

$

Exchange traded
774

1,065



Commodity and other contracts
$
11,531

$
14,336

$

$

Over-the-counter
$
23,925

$
24,602

$
213

$
83

Cleared
5,848

5,987

85

557

Credit derivatives(4)
$
29,773

$
30,589

$
298

$
640

Total derivatives instruments not designated as ASC 815 hedges
$
695,156

$
684,575

$
1,088

$
1,278

Total derivatives
$
704,106

$
687,617

$
3,517

$
2,349

Cash collateral paid/received(5)(6)
$
8,348

$
16,459

$
6

$
50

Less: Netting agreements(7)
(596,599
)
(596,599
)


Less: Netting cash collateral received/paid(8)
(55,239
)
(53,460
)
(1,682
)
(29
)
Net receivables/payables included on the consolidated balance sheet(9)
$
60,616

$
54,017

$
1,841

$
2,370

Additional amounts subject to an enforceable master netting agreement but not offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
 
 
 
Less: Cash collateral received/paid
$
(1,254
)
$
(26
)
$

$

Less: Non-cash collateral received/paid
(12,808
)
(6,724
)
(737
)

Total net receivables/payables(9)
$
46,554

$
47,267

$
1,104

$
2,370

(1)
The trading derivatives fair values are presented in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)
Derivative mark-to-market receivables/payables related to management hedges are recorded in either Other assets/Other liabilities or Trading account assets/Trading account liabilities.
(3)
Over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives are derivatives executed and settled bilaterally with counterparties without the use of an organized exchange or central clearing house. Cleared derivatives include derivatives executed bilaterally with a counterparty in the OTC market but then novated to a central clearing house, whereby the central clearing house becomes the counterparty to both of the original counterparties. Exchange traded derivatives include derivatives executed directly on an organized exchange that provides pre-trade price transparency.
(4)
The credit derivatives trading assets comprise $11,245 million related to protection purchased and $18,528 million related to protection sold as of September 30, 2016. The credit derivatives trading liabilities comprise $19,566 million related to protection purchased and $11,023 million related to protection sold as of September 30, 2016.
(5)
For the trading account assets/liabilities, reflects the net amount of the $61,808 million and $71,698 million of gross cash collateral paid and received, respectively. Of the gross cash collateral paid, $53,460 million was used to offset trading derivative liabilities and, of the gross cash collateral received, $55,239 million was used to offset trading derivative assets.

163



(6)
For cash collateral paid with respect to non-trading derivative assets, reflects the net amount of $35 million of gross cash collateral paid, of which $29 million is netted against non-trading derivative positions within Other liabilities. For cash collateral received with respect to non-trading derivative liabilities, reflects the net amount of $1,732 million of gross cash collateral received, of which $1,682 million is netted against OTC non-trading derivative positions within Other assets.
(7)
Represents the netting of derivative receivable and payable balances with the same counterparty under enforceable netting agreements. Approximately $405 billion, $183 billion and $9 billion of the netting against trading account asset/liability balances is attributable to each of the OTC, cleared and exchange-traded derivatives, respectively.
(8)
Represents the netting of cash collateral paid and received by counterparty under enforceable credit support agreements. Substantially all cash collateral received and paid is netted against OTC derivative assets and liabilities, respectively.
(9)
The net receivables/payables include approximately $9 billion of derivative asset and $9 billion of derivative liability fair values not subject to enforceable master netting agreements, respectively.

In millions of dollars at December 31, 2015
Derivatives classified in Trading
account assets / liabilities(1)(2)(3)
Derivatives classified in Other assets / liabilities(2)(3)
Derivatives instruments designated as ASC 815 hedges
Assets
Liabilities
Assets
Liabilities
Over-the-counter
$
262

$
105

$
2,328

$
106

Cleared
4,607

1,471

5


Interest rate contracts
$
4,869

$
1,576

$
2,333

$
106

Over-the-counter
$
2,688

$
364

$
95

$
677

Foreign exchange contracts
$
2,688

$
364

$
95

$
677

Total derivative instruments designated as ASC 815 hedges
$
7,557

$
1,940

$
2,428

$
783

Derivatives instruments not designated as ASC 815 hedges




Over-the-counter
$
289,124

$
267,761

$
182

$
12

Cleared
120,848

126,532

244

216

Exchange traded
53

35



Interest rate contracts
$
410,025

$
394,328

$
426

$
228

Over-the-counter
$
126,474

$
133,361

$

$
66

Cleared
134

152



Exchange traded
21

36



Foreign exchange contracts
$
126,629

$
133,549

$

$
66

Over-the-counter
$
14,560

$
20,107

$

$

Cleared
28

3



Exchange traded
7,297

6,406



Equity contracts
$
21,885

$
26,516

$

$

Over-the-counter
$
16,794

$
18,641

$

$

Exchange traded
1,216

1,912



Commodity and other contracts
$
18,010

$
20,553

$

$

Over-the-counter
$
31,072

$
30,608

$
711

$
245

Cleared
3,803

3,560

131

318

Credit derivatives(4)
$
34,875

$
34,168

$
842

$
563

Total derivatives instruments not designated as ASC 815 hedges
$
611,424

$
609,114

$
1,268

$
857

Total derivatives
$
618,981

$
611,054

$
3,696

$
1,640

Cash collateral paid/received(5)(6)
$
4,911

$
13,628

$
8

$
37

Less: Netting agreements(7)
(524,481
)
(524,481
)


Less: Netting cash collateral received/paid(8)
(43,227
)
(42,609
)
(1,949
)
(53
)
Net receivables/payables included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(9)
$
56,184

$
57,592

$
1,755

$
1,624

Additional amounts subject to an enforceable master netting agreement but not offset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
 
 
 
 
Less: Cash collateral received/paid
$
(779
)
$
(2
)
$

$

Less: Non-cash collateral received/paid
(9,855
)
(5,131
)
(270
)

Total net receivables/payables(9)
$
45,550

$
52,459

$
1,485

$
1,624

(1)
The trading derivatives fair values are presented in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)
Derivative mark-to-market receivables/payables related to management hedges are recorded in either Other assets/Other liabilities or Trading account assets/Trading account liabilities.
(3)
Over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives include derivatives executed and settled bilaterally with counterparties without the use of an organized exchange or central clearing house. Cleared derivatives include derivatives executed bilaterally with a counterparty in the OTC market but then novated to a central clearing house,

164



whereby the central clearing house becomes the counterparty to both of the original counterparties. Exchange traded derivatives include derivatives executed directly on an organized exchange that provides pre-trade price transparency.
(4)
The credit derivatives trading assets comprise $17,957 million related to protection purchased and $16,918 million related to protection sold as of December 31, 2015. The credit derivatives trading liabilities comprise $16,968 million related to protection purchased and $17,200 million related to protection sold as of December 31, 2015.
(5)
For the trading account assets/liabilities, reflects the net amount of the $47,520 million and $56,855 million of gross cash collateral paid and received, respectively. Of the gross cash collateral paid, $42,609 million was used to offset derivative liabilities and, of the gross cash collateral received, $43,227 million was used to offset derivative assets.
(6)
For cash collateral paid with respect to non-trading derivative assets, reflects the net amount of $61 million of the gross cash collateral received, of which $53 million is netted against non-trading derivative positions within Other liabilities. For cash collateral received with respect to non-trading derivative liabilities, reflects the net amount of $1,986 million of gross cash collateral received, of which $1,949 million is netted against non-trading derivative positions within Other assets.
(7)
Represents the netting of derivative receivable and payable balances with the same counterparty under enforceable netting agreements. Approximately $391 billion, $126 billion and $7 billion of the netting against trading account asset/liability balances is attributable to each of the OTC, cleared and exchange-traded derivatives, respectively.
(8)
Represents the netting of cash collateral paid and received by counterparty under enforceable credit support agreements. Substantially all cash collateral received and paid is netted against OTC derivative assets and liabilities, respectively.
(9)
The net receivables/payables include approximately $10 billion of derivative asset and $10 billion of liability fair values not subject to enforceable master netting agreements, respectively.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the amounts recognized in Principal transactions in the Consolidated Statement of Income related to derivatives not designated in a qualifying hedging relationship, as well as the underlying non-derivative instruments, are presented in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Citigroup presents this disclosure by business classification, showing derivative gains and losses related to its trading activities together with gains and losses related to non-derivative instruments within the same trading portfolios, as this represents the way these portfolios are risk managed.
The amounts recognized in Other revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income related to derivatives not designated in a qualifying hedging relationship are shown below. The table below does not include any offsetting gains/losses on the economically hedged items to the extent such amounts are also recorded in Other revenue.
 

















 
Gains (losses) included in
Other revenue

Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Interest rate contracts
$
(28
)
$
163

$
(2
)
$
127

Foreign exchange
11

(19
)
26

(65
)
Credit derivatives
(399
)
536

(960
)
607

Total Citigroup
$
(416
)
$
680

$
(936
)
$
669




 



165



The following table presents the gains (losses) on the Company’s fair value hedges:
 
Gains (losses) on fair value hedges(1)
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Gain (loss) on the derivatives in designated and qualifying fair value hedges
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
(450
)
$
1,111

$
2,747

$
72

Foreign exchange contracts
(602
)
(311
)
(2,360
)
1,093

Commodity contracts
(57
)
(110
)
381

(69
)
Total gain (loss) on the derivatives in designated and qualifying fair value hedges
$
(1,109
)
$
690

$
768

$
1,096

Gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges
 
 
 
 
Interest rate hedges
$
442

$
(1,113
)
$
(2,701
)
$
(115
)
Foreign exchange hedges
664

304

2,425

(1,081
)
Commodity hedges
59

109

(374
)
81

Total gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges
$
1,165

$
(700
)
$
(650
)
$
(1,115
)
Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges
 
 
 
 
Interest rate hedges
$
(11
)
$
(1
)
$
48

$
(42
)
Foreign exchange hedges
(3
)
(24
)
(53
)
(41
)
Total hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges
$
(14
)
$
(25
)
$
(5
)
$
(83
)
Net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
3

$
(1
)
$
(2
)
$
(1
)
Foreign exchange contracts(2)
65

17

118

53

Commodity hedges(2)
2

(1
)
7

12

Total net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges
$
70

$
15

$
123

$
64

(1)
Amounts are included in Other revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The accrued interest income on fair value hedges is recorded in Net interest revenue and is excluded from this table.
(2)
Amounts relate to the premium associated with forward contracts (differential between spot and contractual forward rates). These amounts are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and are reflected directly in earnings.

166



Cash Flow Hedges
The amount of hedge ineffectiveness on the cash flow hedges recognized in earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, and 2015 is not significant. The pretax change in AOCI from cash flow hedges is presented below:

 
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
(187
)
$
357

$
448

$
594

Foreign exchange contracts
(29
)
(98
)
(26
)
(258
)
Total effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI
$
(216
)
$
259

$
422

$
336

Effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to earnings


 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
(39
)
$
(28
)
$
(96
)
$
(148
)
Foreign exchange contracts
(46
)
(35
)
(89
)
(112
)
Total effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to earnings(1)
$
(85
)
$
(63
)
$
(185
)
$
(260
)
(1)
Included primarily in Other revenue and Net interest revenue on the Consolidated Income Statement.
For cash flow hedges, the changes in the fair value of the hedging derivative remaining in AOCI on the Consolidated Balance Sheet will be included in the earnings of future periods to offset the variability of the hedged cash flows when such cash flows affect earnings. The net loss associated with cash flow hedges expected to be reclassified from AOCI within 12 months of September 30, 2016 is approximately $39 million. The maximum length of time over which forecasted cash flows are hedged is 10 years.
The after-tax impact of cash flow hedges on AOCI is shown in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net Investment Hedges
The pretax gain (loss) recorded in the Foreign currency translation adjustment account within AOCI, related to the effective portion of the net investment hedges, is $(371) million and $(1,791) million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and $1,842 million and $2,599 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.




167



Credit Derivatives

The following tables summarize the key characteristics of Citi’s credit derivatives portfolio by counterparty and derivative form:
 
Fair values
Notionals
In millions of dollars at September 30, 2016
Receivable(1)
Payable(2)
Protection
purchased
Protection
sold
By industry/counterparty




Banks
$
14,728

$
13,202

$
501,904

$
515,590

Broker-dealers
4,240

4,822

132,959

134,774

Non-financial
89

104

3,497

1,279

Insurance and other financial institutions
11,014

13,101

440,586

369,475

Total by industry/counterparty
$
30,071

$
31,229

$
1,078,946

$
1,021,118

By instrument




Credit default swaps and options
$
28,457

$
28,652

$
1,049,969

$
1,006,236

Total return swaps and other
1,614

2,577

28,977

14,882

Total by instrument
$
30,071

$
31,229

$
1,078,946

$
1,021,118

By rating




Investment grade
$
10,860

$
10,914

$
809,822

$
767,629

Non-investment grade
19,211

20,315

269,124

253,489

Total by rating
$
30,071

$
31,229

$
1,078,946

$
1,021,118

By maturity




Within 1 year
$
4,759

$
5,642

$
314,629

$
301,906

From 1 to 5 years
21,143

21,382

661,648

626,205

After 5 years
4,169

4,205

102,669

93,007

Total by maturity
$
30,071

$
31,229

$
1,078,946

$
1,021,118


(1)
The fair value amount receivable is composed of $11,567 million under protection purchased and $18,504 million under protection sold.
(2)
The fair value amount payable is composed of $20,248 million under protection purchased and $10,981 million under protection sold.
 
Fair values
Notionals
In millions of dollars at December 31, 2015
Receivable(1)
Payable(2)
Protection
purchased
Protection
sold
By industry/counterparty




Banks
$
18,377

$
16,988

$
513,335

$
508,459

Broker-dealers
5,895

6,697

155,195

152,604

Non-financial
128

123

3,969

2,087

Insurance and other financial institutions
11,317

10,923

332,715

287,772

Total by industry/counterparty
$
35,717

$
34,731

$
1,005,214

$
950,922

By instrument




Credit default swaps and options
$
34,849

$
34,158

$
981,999

$
940,650

Total return swaps and other
868

573

23,215

10,272

Total by instrument
$
35,717

$
34,731

$
1,005,214

$
950,922

By rating




Investment grade
$
12,694

$
13,142

$
764,040

$
720,521

Non-investment grade
23,023

21,589

241,174

230,401

Total by rating
$
35,717

$
34,731

$
1,005,214

$
950,922

By maturity




Within 1 year
$
3,871

$
3,559

$
265,632

$
254,225

From 1 to 5 years
27,991

27,488

669,834

639,460

After 5 years
3,855

3,684

69,748

57,237

Total by maturity
$
35,717

$
34,731

$
1,005,214

$
950,922



168



(1)
The fair value amount receivable is composed of $18,799 million under protection purchased and $16,918 million under protection sold.
(2)
The fair value amount payable is composed of $17,531 million under protection purchased and $17,200 million under protection sold.

Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features in Derivatives
Certain derivative instruments contain provisions that require the Company to either post additional collateral or immediately settle any outstanding liability balances upon the occurrence of a specified event related to the credit risk of the Company. These events, which are defined by the existing derivative contracts, are primarily downgrades in the credit ratings of the Company and its affiliates. The fair value (excluding CVA) of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position at both September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $27 billion and $22 billion, respectively. The Company had posted $24 billion and $19 billion as collateral for this exposure in the normal course of business as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
A downgrade could trigger additional collateral or cash settlement requirements for the Company and certain affiliates. In the event that Citigroup and Citibank were downgraded a single notch by all three major rating agencies as of September 30, 2016, the Company could be required to post an additional $1.7 billion as either collateral or settlement of the derivative transactions. Additionally, the Company could be required to segregate with third-party custodians collateral previously received from existing derivative counterparties in the amount of $0.1 billion upon the single notch downgrade, resulting in aggregate cash obligations and collateral requirements of approximately $1.8 billion.

Derivatives Accompanied by Financial Asset Transfers
For transfers of financial assets accounted for by the Company as a sale, where the Company has retained substantially all of the economic exposure to the transferred asset through a total return swap executed in contemplation of the initial sale with the same counterparty and still outstanding as of September 30, 2016, both the asset carrying amounts derecognized and gross cash proceeds received as of the date of derecognition were $1.5 billion. At September 30, 2016, the fair value of these previously derecognized assets was $1.5 billion and the fair value of the total return swaps was $13 million recorded as gross derivative assets and $6 million recorded as gross derivative liabilities. The balances for the total return swaps are on a gross basis, before the application of counterparty and cash collateral netting, and are included primarily as equity derivatives in the tabular disclosures in this Note.



169



20.   FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
For additional information regarding fair value measurement at Citi, see Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Market Valuation Adjustments
The table below summarizes the credit valuation adjustments (CVA) and funding valuation adjustments (FVA) applied to the fair value of derivative instruments at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
 
Credit and funding valuation adjustments
contra-liability (contra-asset)
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
Counterparty CVA
$
(1,849
)
$
(1,470
)
Asset FVA
(642
)
(584
)
Citigroup (own-credit) CVA
542

471

Liability FVA
94

106

Total CVA—derivative instruments(1)
$
(1,855
)
$
(1,477
)

(1)
FVA is included with CVA for presentation purposes.

The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses) related to changes in CVA on derivative instruments, net of hedges, FVA on derivatives and debt valuation adjustments (DVA) reflecting the change in Citi’s own credit spreads on fair value option (FVO) liabilities for the periods indicated:
 
Credit/funding/debt valuation
adjustments gain (loss)
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Counterparty CVA
$
112

$
(32
)
$
19

$
(191
)
Asset FVA
37

(177
)
(59
)
(125
)
Own-credit CVA
(60
)
97

65

81

Liability FVA
(59
)
44

(11
)
89

Total CVA—derivative instruments(1)
$
30

$
(68
)
$
14

$
(146
)
DVA related to own FVO liabilities (2)
$
(319
)
$
264

$
8

$
582


(1)
FVA is included with CVA for presentation purposes.
(2)
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.





170



Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present for each of the fair value hierarchy levels the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The Company may hedge positions that have been classified in the Level 3 category with other financial instruments (hedging instruments) that may be
 
classified as Level 3, but also with financial instruments classified as Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The effects of these hedges are presented gross in the following tables:



Fair Value Levels
In millions of dollars at September 30, 2016
Level 1(1)
Level 2(1)
Level 3
Gross
inventory
Netting(2)
Net
balance
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
$

$
178,462

$
1,313

$
179,775

$
(36,157
)
$
143,618

Trading non-derivative assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed

25,921

228

26,149


26,149

Residential

335

441

776


776

Commercial

1,072

444

1,516


1,516

Total trading mortgage-backed securities
$

$
27,328

$
1,113

$
28,441

$

$
28,441

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
20,537

$
2,929

$
1

$
23,467

$

$
23,467

State and municipal

3,803

157

3,960


3,960

Foreign government
38,147

19,388

63

57,598


57,598

Corporate
545

16,585

685

17,815


17,815

Equity securities
50,741

1,443

3,560

55,744


55,744

Asset-backed securities

850

2,749

3,599


3,599

Other trading assets(9)
6

9,526

2,580

12,112


12,112

Total trading non-derivative assets
$
109,976

$
81,852

$
10,908

$
202,736

$

$
202,736

Trading derivatives




 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
39

$
516,241

$
3,423

$
519,703

 
 
Foreign exchange contracts
57

115,889

760

116,706

 
 
Equity contracts
2,932

22,156

1,305

26,393

 
 
Commodity contracts
215

10,716

600

11,531

 
 
Credit derivatives

27,815

1,958

29,773

 
 
Total trading derivatives
$
3,243

$
692,817

$
8,046

$
704,106

 
 
Cash collateral paid(3)
 
 
 
$
8,348

 
 
Netting agreements
 
 
 
 
$
(596,599
)
 
Netting of cash collateral received
 
 
 
 
(55,239
)
 
Total trading derivatives
$
3,243

$
692,817

$
8,046

$
712,454

$
(651,838
)
$
60,616

Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$

$
43,113

$
89

$
43,202

$

$
43,202

Residential

4,448

53

4,501


4,501

Commercial

354


354


354

Total investment mortgage-backed securities
$

$
47,915

$
142

$
48,057

$

$
48,057

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
109,926

$
11,778

$
2

$
121,706

$

$
121,706

State and municipal

9,535

1,656

11,191


11,191

Foreign government
50,131

47,864

145

98,140


98,140

Corporate
4,949

13,607

524

19,080


19,080

Equity securities
1,274

41

10

1,325


1,325

Asset-backed securities

6,744

682

7,426


7,426

Other debt securities

1,181

11

1,192


1,192

Non-marketable equity securities(4)

49

1,181

1,230


1,230

Total investments
$
166,280

$
138,714

$
4,353

$
309,347

$

$
309,347


171



In millions of dollars at September 30, 2016
Level 1(1)
Level 2(1)
Level 3
Gross
inventory
Netting(2)
Net
balance
Loans
$

$
2,888

$
1,082

$
3,970

$

$
3,970

Mortgage servicing rights


1,270

1,270


1,270

Non-trading derivatives and other financial assets measured on a recurring basis, gross
$

$
8,070

$
66

$
8,136

 
 
Cash collateral paid(5)
 
 
 
6

 
 
Netting of cash collateral received
 
 
 
 
$
(1,682
)
 
Non-trading derivatives and other financial assets measured on a recurring basis
$

$
8,070

$
66

$
8,142

$
(1,682
)
$
6,460

Total assets
$
279,499

$
1,102,803

$
27,038

$
1,417,694

$
(689,677
)
$
728,017

Total as a percentage of gross assets(6)
19.8
%
78.2
%
1.9
%






Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits
$

$
1,160

$
260

$
1,420

$

$
1,420

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

78,173

923

79,096

(36,157
)
42,939

Trading account liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities sold, not yet purchased
67,655

9,712

159

77,526


77,526

Other trading liabilities

105

1

106


106

Total trading liabilities
$
67,655

$
9,817

$
160

$
77,632

$

$
77,632

Trading derivatives
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
36

$
493,883

$
3,986

$
497,905

 
 
Foreign exchange contracts
1

114,463

671

115,135

 
 
Equity contracts
2,764

24,616

2,272

29,652

 
 
Commodity contracts
192

11,245

2,899

14,336

 
 
Credit derivatives

27,612

2,977

30,589

 
 
Total trading derivatives
$
2,993

$
671,819

$
12,805

$
687,617

 
 
Cash collateral received(7)
 
 
 
$
16,459

 
 
Netting agreements
 
 
 
 
$
(596,599
)
 
Netting of cash collateral paid
 
 
 
 
(53,460
)
 
Total trading derivatives
$
2,993

$
671,819

$
12,805

$
704,076

$
(650,059
)
$
54,017

Short-term borrowings
$

$
2,567

$
32

$
2,599

$

$
2,599

Long-term debt

18,353

9,182

27,535


27,535

Non-trading derivatives and other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis, gross
$

$
2,316

$
32

$
2,348

 
 
Cash collateral received(8)
 
 
 
50

 
 
Netting of cash collateral paid
 
 
 
 
$
(29
)
 
Total non-trading derivatives and other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis
$

$
2,316

$
32

$
2,398

$
(29
)
$
2,369

Total liabilities
$
70,648

$
784,205

$
23,394

$
894,756

$
(686,245
)
$
208,511

Total as a percentage of gross liabilities(6)
8.0
%
89.3
%
2.7
%
 
 
 

(1)
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company transferred assets of approximately $0.1 billion and $1.1 billion from Level 1 to Level 2, respectively, primarily related to foreign government securities and equity securities not traded in active markets. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company transferred assets of approximately $1.4 billion and $3.7 billion from Level 2 to Level 1, respectively, primarily related to foreign government bonds traded with sufficient frequency to constitute an active market. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company transferred liabilities of approximately $0.2 billion and $0.3 billion from Level 2 to Level 1, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, there were no material transfers of liabilities from Level 1 to Level 2.
(2)
Represents netting of: (i) the amounts due under securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase; and (ii) derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement and cash collateral offsetting.
(3)
Reflects the net amount of $61,808 million of gross cash collateral paid, of which $53,460 million was used to offset trading derivative liabilities.
(4)
Amounts exclude $0.7 billion investments measured at Net Asset Value (NAV) in accordance with ASU No. 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).
(5)
Reflects the net amount of $35 million of gross cash collateral paid, of which $29 million was used to offset non-trading derivative liabilities.
(6)
Because the amount of the cash collateral paid/received has not been allocated to the Level 1, 2 and 3 subtotals, these percentages are calculated based on total assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding the cash collateral paid/received on derivatives.
(7)
Reflects the net amount of $71,698 million of gross cash collateral received, of which $55,239 million was used to offset trading derivative assets.
(8)
Reflects the net amount of $1,732 million of gross cash collateral received, of which $1,682 million was used to offset non-trading derivative assets.

172




(9)
Includes positions related to investments in unallocated precious metals, as discussed in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Also includes physical commodities accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value and unfunded credit products.

Fair Value Levels
In millions of dollars at December 31, 2015
Level 1(1)
Level 2(1)
Level 3
Gross
inventory
Netting(2)
Net
balance
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
$

$
177,538

$
1,337

$
178,875

$
(40,911
)
$
137,964

Trading non-derivative assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed

24,023

744

24,767


24,767

Residential

1,059

1,326

2,385


2,385

Commercial

2,338

517

2,855


2,855

Total trading mortgage-backed securities
$

$
27,420

$
2,587

$
30,007

$

$
30,007

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
14,208

$
3,587

$
1

$
17,796

$

$
17,796

State and municipal

2,345

351

2,696


2,696

Foreign government
35,715

20,555

197

56,467


56,467

Corporate
302

13,901

376

14,579


14,579

Equity securities
50,429

2,382

3,684

56,495


56,495

Asset-backed securities

1,217

2,739

3,956


3,956

Other trading assets(9)

9,293

2,483

11,776


11,776

Total trading non-derivative assets
$
100,654

$
80,700

$
12,418

$
193,772

$

$
193,772

Trading derivatives
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
9

$
412,802

$
2,083

$
414,894

 
 
Foreign exchange contracts
5

128,189

1,123

129,317

 
 
Equity contracts
2,422

17,866

1,597

21,885

 
 
Commodity contracts
204

16,706

1,100

18,010

 
 
Credit derivatives

31,082

3,793

34,875

 
 
Total trading derivatives
$
2,640

$
606,645

$
9,696

$
618,981

 
 
Cash collateral paid(3)
 
 
 
$
4,911

 
 
Netting agreements
 
 
 
 
$
(524,481
)
 
Netting of cash collateral received
 
 
 
 
(43,227
)
 
Total trading derivatives
$
2,640

$
606,645

$
9,696

$
623,892

$
(567,708
)
$
56,184

Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$

$
39,575

$
139

$
39,714

$

$
39,714

Residential

5,982

4

5,986


5,986

Commercial

569

2

571


571

Total investment mortgage-backed securities
$

$
46,126

$
145

$
46,271

$

$
46,271

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
111,536

$
11,375

$
4

$
122,915

$

$
122,915

State and municipal

9,267

2,192

11,459


11,459

Foreign government
42,073

46,341

260

88,674


88,674

Corporate
3,605

15,122

603

19,330


19,330

Equity securities
430

71

124

625


625

Asset-backed securities

8,578

596

9,174


9,174

Other debt securities

688


688


688

Non-marketable equity securities(4)

58

1,135

1,193


1,193

Total investments
$
157,644

$
137,626

$
5,059

$
300,329

$

$
300,329


173



In millions of dollars at December 31, 2015
Level 1(1)
Level 2(1)
Level 3
Gross
inventory
Netting(2)
Net
balance
Loans
$

$
2,839

$
2,166

$
5,005

$

$
5,005

Mortgage servicing rights


1,781

1,781


1,781

Non-trading derivatives and other financial assets measured on a recurring basis, gross
$

$
7,882

$
180

$
8,062

 
 
Cash collateral paid(5)
 
 
 
8

 
 
Netting of cash collateral received
 
 
 
 
$
(1,949
)
 
Non-trading derivatives and other financial assets measured on a recurring basis
$

$
7,882

$
180

$
8,070

$
(1,949
)
$
6,121

Total assets
$
260,938

$
1,013,230

$
32,637

$
1,311,724

$
(610,568
)
$
701,156

Total as a percentage of gross assets(6)
20.0
%
77.5
%
2.5
%
 
 
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits
$

$
1,156

$
434

$
1,590

$

$
1,590

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

76,507

1,247

77,754

(40,911
)
36,843

Trading account liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities sold, not yet purchased
48,452

9,176

199

57,827


57,827

Other trading liabilities

2,093


2,093


2,093

Total trading liabilities
$
48,452

$
11,269

$
199

$
59,920

$

$
59,920

Trading account derivatives
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
5

$
393,321

$
2,578

$
395,904

 
 
Foreign exchange contracts
6

133,404

503

133,913

 
 
Equity contracts
2,244

21,875

2,397

26,516

 
 
Commodity contracts
263

17,329

2,961

20,553

 
 
Credit derivatives

30,682

3,486

34,168

 
 
Total trading derivatives
$
2,518

$
596,611

$
11,925

$
611,054

 
 
Cash collateral received(7)
 
 
 
$
13,628

 
 
Netting agreements
 
 
 
 
$
(524,481
)
 
Netting of cash collateral paid
 
 
 
 
(42,609
)
 
Total trading derivatives
$
2,518

$
596,611

$
11,925

$
624,682

$
(567,090
)
$
57,592

Short-term borrowings
$

$
1,198

$
9

$
1,207

$

$
1,207

Long-term debt

17,750

7,543

25,293


25,293

Non-trading derivatives and other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis, gross
$

$
1,626

$
14

$
1,640

 
 
Cash collateral received(8)
 
 
 
37

 
 
Netting of cash collateral paid
 
 
 
 
$
(53
)
 
Non-trading derivatives and other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis
$

$
1,626

$
14

$
1,677

$
(53
)
$
1,624

Total liabilities
$
50,970

$
706,117

$
21,371

$
792,123

$
(608,054
)
$
184,069

Total as a percentage of gross liabilities(6)
6.5
%
90.7
%
2.7
%
 
 
 

(1)
In 2015, the Company transferred assets of approximately $3.3 billion from Level 1 to Level 2, respectively, primarily related to foreign government securities and equity securities not traded in active markets. In 2015, the Company transferred assets of approximately $4.4 billion from Level 2 to Level 1, respectively, primarily related to foreign government bonds and equity securities traded with sufficient frequency to constitute a liquid market. In 2015, the Company transferred liabilities of approximately $0.6 billion from Level 2 to Level 1. In 2015, the Company transferred liabilities of approximately $0.4 billion from Level 1 to Level 2.
(2)
Represents netting of: (i) the amounts due under securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase; and (ii) derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement and cash collateral offsetting.
(3)
Reflects the net amount of $47,520 million of gross cash collateral paid, of which $42,609 million was used to offset trading derivative liabilities.
(4)
Amounts exclude $0.9 billion investments measured at Net Asset Value (NAV) in accordance with ASU No. 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).
(5)
Reflects the net amount of $61 million of gross cash collateral paid, of which $53 million was used to offset non-trading derivative liabilities.
(6)
Because the amount of the cash collateral paid/received has not been allocated to the Level 1, 2 and 3 subtotals, these percentages are calculated based on total assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding the cash collateral paid/received on derivatives.
(7)
Reflects the net amount of $56,855 million of gross cash collateral received, of which $43,227 million was used to offset trading derivative assets.
(8)
Reflects the net amount of $1,986 million of gross cash collateral received, of which $1,949 million was used to offset non-trading derivative assets.
(9)
Includes positions related to investments in unallocated precious metals, as discussed in Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Also includes physical commodities accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value and unfunded credit products.

174



Changes in Level 3 Fair Value Category
The following tables present the changes in the Level 3 fair value category for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. The gains and losses presented below include changes in the fair value related to both observable and unobservable inputs.
The Company often hedges positions with offsetting positions that are classified in a different level. For example, the gains and losses for assets and liabilities in the Level 3
 
category presented in the tables below do not reflect the effect of offsetting losses and gains on hedging instruments that may be classified in the Level 1 or Level 2 categories. In addition, the Company hedges items classified in the Level 3 category with instruments also classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The hedged items and related hedges are presented gross in the following tables:


Level 3 Fair Value Rollforward
 
 
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Jun. 30, 2016
Principal
transactions
Other(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2016
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
$
1,819

$
(6
)
$

$

$

$
5

$

$

$
(505
)
$
1,313

$
(3
)
Trading non-derivative assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
730

1


67

(387
)
96


(286
)
7

228


Residential
801

116


5

(66
)
18


(433
)

441

(58
)
Commercial
390

2


1

(107
)
309


(151
)

444

6

Total trading mortgage-backed securities
$
1,921

$
119

$

$
73

$
(560
)
$
423

$

$
(870
)
$
7

$
1,113

$
(52
)
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
3

$

$

$

$

$

$

$
(2
)
$

$
1

$

State and municipal
117

18


118

(37
)
56


(115
)

157

(1
)
Foreign government
81

(19
)



24


(23
)

63

1

Corporate
405

39


49

(26
)
414


(208
)
12

685

(31
)
Equity securities
3,970

348


12

(811
)
102


(61
)

3,560

(371
)
Asset-backed securities
2,670

47


38

(42
)
783


(747
)

2,749

(58
)
Other trading assets
2,839

12


296

(897
)
966

9

(628
)
(17
)
2,580

(63
)
Total trading non-derivative assets
$
12,006

$
564

$

$
586

$
(2,373
)
$
2,768

$
9

$
(2,654
)
$
2

$
10,908

$
(575
)
Trading derivatives, net(4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
(374
)
$
(82
)
$

$
(59
)
$
77

$
5

$

$
(37
)
$
(93
)
$
(563
)
$
(143
)
Foreign exchange contracts
(29
)
10


69

(13
)
52


(50
)
50

89

149

Equity contracts
(1,071
)
29


14

123

17


(28
)
(51
)
(967
)
(189
)
Commodity contracts
(2,017
)
(76
)

(379
)
74

3


5

91

(2,299
)
(285
)
Credit derivatives
(754
)
(651
)

32

26

(4
)

(35
)
367

(1,019
)
450

Total trading derivatives, net(4)
$
(4,245
)
$
(770
)
$

$
(323
)
$
287

$
73

$

$
(145
)
$
364

$
(4,759
)
$
(18
)

175



 
 
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Jun. 30, 2016
Principal
transactions
Other(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2016
Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
94

$

$
(4
)
$
3

$
(10
)
$
6

$

$

$

$
89

$
(1
)
Residential
25


1

49


1


(23
)

53


Commercial
5


(1
)

(4
)






Total investment mortgage-backed securities
$
124

$

$
(4
)
$
52

$
(14
)
$
7

$

$
(23
)
$

$
142

$
(1
)
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
3

$

$

$

$

$

$

$
(1
)
$

$
2

$

State and municipal
2,016


(54
)
5

(338
)
60


(33
)

1,656

40

Foreign government
141


(14
)
5


42


(29
)

145

(5
)
Corporate
460


42

1

(18
)
412


(8
)
(365
)
524

(1
)
Equity securities
128


11





(129
)

10


Asset-backed securities
597


(88
)
3

(25
)
121


(7
)
81

682

88

Other debt securities
5



10


1


(5
)

11


Non-marketable equity securities
1,139


54

53

(23
)
1


(14
)
(29
)
1,181

(9
)
Total investments
$
4,613

$

$
(53
)
$
129

$
(418
)
$
644

$

$
(249
)
$
(313
)
$
4,353

$
112

Loans
$
1,234

$

$
89

$
24

$
(196
)
$
93

$

$
(137
)
$
(25
)
$
1,082

$
(179
)
Mortgage servicing rights
1,324


13




43

(32
)
(78
)
1,270

15

Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis
111


31

1

(41
)
1

72

(4
)
(105
)
66

(69
)
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits
$
433

$

$
41

$

$
(100
)
$

$

$

$
(32
)
$
260

$
42

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
1,107

10



(150
)


11

(35
)
923

8

Trading account liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities sold, not yet purchased
12

(30
)

21

(42
)
(9
)

142

5

159

(30
)
Other trading liabilities



1






1


Short-term borrowings
53

(9
)

1

(32
)

15


(14
)
32

2

Long-term debt
9,138

(191
)

947

(1,550
)

1,719


(1,263
)
9,182

(191
)
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis
5


(26
)
2


(1
)



32

(2
)





176



 
 
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Dec. 31, 2015
Principal
transactions
Other(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2016
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
$
1,337

$
2

$

$

$
(28
)
$
508

$

$

$
(506
)
$
1,313

$
3

Trading non-derivative assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
744

13


485

(969
)
857


(920
)
18

228

4

Residential
1,326

104


134

(153
)
275


(1,239
)
(6
)
441

23

Commercial
517

15


180

(209
)
661


(720
)

444

(23
)
Total trading mortgage-backed securities
$
2,587

$
132

$

$
799

$
(1,331
)
$
1,793

$

$
(2,879
)
$
12

$
1,113

$
4

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
1

$

$

$
2

$

$

$

$
(2
)
$

$
1

$

State and municipal
351

26


136

(253
)
224


(327
)

157


Foreign government
197

(27
)

2

(17
)
99


(191
)

63

(2
)
Corporate
376

323


129

(102
)
748


(796
)
7

685

58

Equity securities
3,684

(187
)

279

(871
)
851


(196
)

3,560

(125
)
Asset-backed securities
2,739

181


195

(237
)
1,969


(2,098
)

2,749

87

Other trading assets
2,483

(104
)

1,754

(2,379
)
2,323

7

(1,468
)
(36
)
2,580

136

Total trading non-derivative assets
$
12,418

$
344

$

$
3,296

$
(5,190
)
$
8,007

$
7

$
(7,957
)
$
(17
)
$
10,908

$
158

Trading derivatives, net(4)






















Interest rate contracts
(495
)
(408
)

250

116

147

(18
)
(140
)
(15
)
(563
)
84

Foreign exchange contracts
620

(667
)

73

(73
)
158


(141
)
119

89

(428
)
Equity contracts
(800
)
137


78

(305
)
63

38

(99
)
(79
)
(967
)
191

Commodity contracts
(1,861
)
(357
)

(428
)
48

359


(347
)
287

(2,299
)
11

Credit derivatives
307

(1,803
)

(82
)
3

38


(35
)
553

(1,019
)
(1,272
)
Total trading derivatives, net(4)
$
(2,229
)
$
(3,098
)
$

$
(109
)
$
(211
)
$
765

$
20

$
(762
)
$
865

$
(4,759
)
$
(1,414
)

177



 
 
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Dec. 31, 2015
Principal
transactions
Other(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2016
Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
139

$

$
(29
)
$
15

$
(72
)
$
46

$

$
(9
)
$
(1
)
$
89

$
49

Residential
4


2

49


26


(28
)

53

1

Commercial
2


(1
)
6

(7
)






Total investment mortgage-backed securities
$
145

$

$
(28
)
$
70

$
(79
)
$
72

$

$
(37
)
$
(1
)
$
142

$
50

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
4

$

$

$

$

$

$

$
(2
)
$

$
2

$

State and municipal
2,192


108

396

(1,121
)
300


(219
)

1,656

45

Foreign government
260


5

38


145


(300
)
(3
)
145

1

Corporate
603


87

6

(63
)
506


(250
)
(365
)
524

1

Equity securities
124


11

4




(129
)

10


Asset-backed securities
596


(53
)
3

(48
)
325


(222
)
81

682

(35
)
Other debt securities



10


6


(5
)

11


Non-marketable equity securities
1,135


78

104

(23
)
19


(14
)
(118
)
1,181

29

Total investments
$
5,059

$

$
208

$
631

$
(1,334
)
$
1,373

$

$
(1,178
)
$
(406
)
$
4,353

$
91

Loans
$
2,166

$

$
31

$
113

$
(734
)
$
663

$
219

$
(812
)
$
(564
)
$
1,082

$
383

Mortgage servicing rights
$
1,781

$

$
(349
)
$

$

$

$
111

$
(18
)
$
(255
)
$
1,270

$
(154
)
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis
$
180

$

$
64

$
41

$
(46
)
$
1

$
202

$
(128
)
$
(248
)
$
66

$
(260
)
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits
$
434

$

$
76

$
322

$
(309
)
$

$
5

$

$
(116
)
$
260

$
42

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
1,247

(11
)


(150
)


27

(212
)
923

(24
)
Trading account liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities sold, not yet purchased
199

(16
)

118

(85
)
(70
)
(41
)
212

(190
)
159

(61
)
Other trading liabilities



1






1


Short-term borrowings
9

(36
)

18

(36
)

56


(51
)
32

2

Long-term debt
7,543

(217
)

2,168

(3,393
)

4,591

61

(2,005
)
9,182

(277
)
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis
14


(33
)
2

(10
)
(7
)
2


(2
)
32

(7
)

(1)
Changes in fair value for available-for-sale investments are recorded in AOCI, unless related to other-than-temporary impairment, while gains and losses from sales are recorded in Realized gains (losses) from sales of investments on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
(2)
Unrealized gains (losses) on MSRs are recorded in Other revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
(3)
Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period, included in earnings (and AOCI for changes in fair value of available-for-sale investments), attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at September 30, 2016.
(4)
Total Level 3 trading derivative assets and liabilities have been netted in these tables for presentation purposes only.


178



 
 
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Jun. 30, 2015
Principal
transactions
Other(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2015
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
$
1,070

$
66

$

$
279

$

$

$

$

$

$
1,415

$
1

Trading non-derivative assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
611

$
1

$

$
208

$
(212
)
$
166

$

$
(131
)
$
9

$
652

$
2

Residential
2,206

37


57

(119
)
294


(450
)

2,025

1

Commercial
368

3


20

(60
)
30


(139
)

222

1

Total trading mortgage-backed securities
$
3,185

$
41

$

$
285

$
(391
)
$
490

$

$
(720
)
$
9

$
2,899

$
4

U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$

$

$

$
1

$

$
2

$

$

$

$
3

$

State and municipal
249

9


8

(22
)
39


(6
)

277


Foreign government
82

(1
)

25


19


(40
)

85

(1
)
Corporate
708

(19
)

53

(177
)
94


(268
)

391

(6
)
Equity securities
2,741

75


148

(52
)
438


(66
)

3,284

16

Asset-backed securities
4,236

66


53

(109
)
827


(1,696
)

3,377

11

Other trading assets
3,098

(45
)

124

(816
)
457

9

(520
)
(19
)
2,288

27

Total trading non-derivative assets
$
14,299

$
126

$

$
697

$
(1,567
)
$
2,366

$
9

$
(3,316
)
$
(10
)
$
12,604

$
51

Trading derivatives, net(4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
(423
)
(205
)

(1
)
2

(5
)


(8
)
(640
)
(61
)
Foreign exchange contracts
391

206


(4
)
106

102


(92
)
(42
)
667

83

Equity contracts
(355
)
272


(31
)
(108
)
172


(184
)
(218
)
(452
)
187

Commodity contracts
(1,727
)
(166
)

31

(21
)



36

(1,847
)
(196
)
Credit derivatives
(574
)
457


52

64




90

89

196

Total trading derivatives, net(4)
$
(2,688
)
$
564

$

$
47

$
43

$
269

$

$
(276
)
$
(142
)
$
(2,183
)
$
209

Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
96

$

$
(4
)
$
29

$
(68
)
$
62

$

$
(1
)
$

$
114

$
(4
)
Residential
10







(10
)



Commercial



2






2


Total investment mortgage-backed securities
$
106

$

$
(4
)
$
31

$
(68
)
$
62

$

$
(11
)
$

$
116

$
(4
)
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
5

$

$

$

$

$
6

$

$
(1
)
$

$
10

$

State and municipal
2,153


11

305

(268
)
253


(189
)
(100
)
2,165

(4
)
Foreign government
493


(7
)
3

(156
)
74


(164
)

243


Corporate
698


(38
)
4


53


(75
)
(1
)
641

(35
)
Equity securities
483


31

5


7


(81
)

445

10

Asset-backed securities
503


(8
)
45


18




558

(5
)
Other debt securities





10




10


Non-marketable equity securities
1,238


14

1


1



(12
)
1,242

18

Total investments
$
5,679

$

$
(1
)
$
394

$
(492
)
$
484

$

$
(521
)
$
(113
)
$
5,430

$
(20
)

179



 
 
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Jun. 30, 2015
Principal
transactions
Other(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2015
Loans
$
3,840

$

$
(125
)
$

$
(720
)
$
162

$
69

$
(121
)
$
(450
)
$
2,655

$
(7
)
Mortgage servicing rights
1,924


(131
)



55

4

(86
)
1,766

(129
)
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis
139


78

7

(11
)
1

67

(7
)
(82
)
192

(12
)
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits
$
347

$

$
(108
)
$

$

$

$
12

$

$
(9
)
$
458

$
(204
)
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
965

(1
)





292

1

1,259

(1
)
Trading account liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities sold, not yet purchased
257

63


66

(9
)


103

(120
)
234

(9
)
Other trading liabilities











Short-term borrowings
133

(9
)

4

(3
)

10


(51
)
102

(12
)
Long-term debt
7,665

194


995

(736
)

679


(214
)
8,195

(180
)
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis
4


(1
)
2


(1
)
1

2

(4
)
5

1


180



 
 
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Dec. 31, 2014
Principal
transactions
Other(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2015
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
$
3,398

$
(69
)
$

$
279

$
(2,856
)
$
784

$

$

$
(121
)
$
1,415

$
1

Trading non-derivative assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
1,085

30


690

(1,062
)
505


(619
)
23

652

1

Residential
2,680

243


235

(401
)
1,423


(2,155
)

2,025

(97
)
Commercial
440

16


176

(138
)
442


(714
)

222

(9
)
Total trading mortgage-backed securities
$
4,205

$
289

$

$
1,101

$
(1,601
)
$
2,370

$

$
(3,488
)
$
23

$
2,899

$
(105
)
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$

$

$

$
1

$

$
2

$

$

$

$
3

$

State and municipal
241

(1
)

35

(29
)
48


(17
)

277

2

Foreign government
206

(4
)

52

(100
)
124


(139
)
(54
)
85

2

Corporate
820

185


107

(262
)
605


(1,053
)
(11
)
391

24

Equity securities
2,219

29


310

(240
)
1,180


(214
)

3,284

93

Asset-backed securities
3,294

299


623

(224
)
3,586


(4,201
)

3,377

74

Other trading assets
4,372

15


441

(2,744
)
2,089

41

(1,887
)
(39
)
2,288

34

Total trading non-derivative assets
$
15,357

$
812

$

$
2,670

$
(5,200
)
$
10,004

$
41

$
(10,999
)
$
(81
)
$
12,604

$
124

Trading derivatives, net(4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts
$
(211
)
$
(633
)
$

$
(137
)
$
(37
)
$
13

$

$
166

$
199

$
(640
)
$
117

Foreign exchange contracts
778

(218
)

(5
)
25

276


(270
)
81

667

95

Equity contracts
(863
)
594


(54
)
8

322


(324
)
(135
)
(452
)
47

Commodity contracts
(1,622
)
(556
)

214

(11
)



128

(1,847
)
(361
)
Credit derivatives
(743
)
335


83

72



(3
)
345

89

219

Total trading derivatives, net(4)
$
(2,661
)
$
(478
)
$

$
101

$
57

$
611

$

$
(431
)
$
618

$
(2,183
)
$
117

Investments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed
$
38

$

$
(4
)
$
133

$
(113
)
$
62

$

$
(2
)
$

$
114

$
(4
)
Residential
8


(1
)


11


(18
)



Commercial
1



4

(3
)




2


Total investment mortgage-backed securities
$
47

$

$
(5
)
$
137

$
(116
)
$
73

$

$
(20
)
$

$
116

$
(4
)
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities
$
6

$

$

$

$

$
6

$

$
(2
)
$

$
10

$

State and municipal
2,180


4

464

(506
)
652


(529
)
(100
)
2,165

(35
)
Foreign government
678


41

(5
)
(261
)
558


(498
)
(270
)
243


Corporate
672


8

6

(44
)
122


(88
)
(35
)
641

(38
)
Equity securities
681


(55
)
12

(10
)
7


(190
)

445

10

Asset-backed securities
549


(28
)
45

(58
)
51


(1
)

558

(6
)
Other debt securities





10




10


Non-marketable equity securities
1,460


4

76

6

5


(53
)
(256
)
1,242

74

Total investments
$
6,273

$

$
(31
)
$
735

$
(989
)
$
1,484

$

$
(1,381
)
$
(661
)
$
5,430

$
1


181



 
 
Net realized/unrealized
gains (losses) incl. in
Transfers
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized
gains
(losses)
still held
(3)
In millions of dollars
Dec. 31, 2014
Principal
transactions
Other(1)(2)
into
Level 3
out of
Level 3
Purchases
Issuances
Sales
Settlements
Sept. 30, 2015
Loans
$
3,108

$

$
(199
)
$
689

$
(805
)
$
736

$
432

$
(496
)
$
(810
)
$
2,655

$
16

Mortgage servicing rights
1,845


62




165

(37
)
(269
)
1,766

(390
)
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis
78


94

87

(18
)
4

165

(21
)
(197
)
192

453

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits
$
486

$

$
(7
)
$

$

$

$
12

$

$
(47
)
$
458

$
(250
)
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
1,043

(24
)





285

(93
)
1,259


Trading account liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities sold, not yet purchased
424

41


263

(196
)


260

(476
)
234

(22
)
Other trading liabilities











Short-term borrowings
344

1


21

(18
)

59


(303
)
102

(15
)
Long-term debt
7,290

562


2,081

(2,774
)

3,080


(920
)
8,195

(230
)
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis
7


(8
)
2

(4
)
(3
)
3

2

(10
)
5


(1)
Changes in fair value of available-for-sale investments are recorded in AOCI, unless related to other-than-temporary impairment, while gains and losses from sales are recorded in Realized gains (losses) from sales of investments on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
(2)
Unrealized gains (losses) on MSRs are recorded in Other revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
(3)
Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period, included in earnings (and AOCI for changes in fair value of available-for-sale investments), attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at September 30, 2015.
(4)
Total Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities have been netted in these tables for presentation purposes only.
Level 3 Fair Value Rollforward
The following were the significant Level 3 transfers for the period June 30, 2016 to September 30, 2016:

Transfers of Other trading assets of $0.3 billion from Level 2 to Level 3, and of $0.9 billion from Level 3 to Level 2, related to trading loans, reflecting changes in the volume of market quotations.
Transfers of Long-term debt of $0.9 billion from Level 2 to Level 3, and of $1.6 billion from Level 3 to Level 2, mainly related to structured debt, reflecting changes in the significance of unobservable inputs as well as certain underlying market inputs becoming less or more observable.

The following were the significant Level 3 transfers for the period December 31, 2015 to September 30, 2016:

Transfers of Trading mortgage-backed securities of $0.5 billion from Level 2 to Level 3, and of $1.0 billion from Level 3 to Level 2, related to Agency Guaranteed MBS securities, reflecting changes in the volume of market quotations.
Transfers of Other trading assets of $1.8 billion from Level 2 to Level 3, and of $2.4 billion from Level 3 to Level 2, related to trading loans, reflecting changes in the volume of market quotations.
Transfers of Long-term debt of $2.2 billion from Level 2 to Level 3, and of $3.4 billion from Level 3 to Level 2, mainly related to structured debt, reflecting changes in the significance of unobservable inputs as well as certain
 
underlying market inputs becoming less or more observable.
Transfers of State and municipal of $1.1 billion from Level 3 to Level 2, mainly related to changes in the volume of market quotations.

There were no significant Level 3 transfers for the period from June 30, 2015 to September 30, 2015.

The following were the significant Level 3 transfers for the period December 31, 2014 to September 30, 2015:

Transfers of Federal Funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell of $2.9 billion from Level 3 to Level 2 related to shortening of the remaining tenor of certain reverse repos. There is more transparency and observability for repo curves used in the valuation of structured reverse repos with tenors up to five years; thus, these positions are generally classified as Level 2.
Transfers of U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed MBS in Trading account assets of $1 billion from Level 3 to Level 2 primarily related to increased observability due to an increase in market trading activity.
Transfers of Other trading assets of $2.7 billion from Level 3 to Level 2 primarily related to trading loans for which there was increased volume of and transparency into market quotations.
Transfers of Long-term debt of $2.1 billion from Level 2 to Level 3, and of $2.8 billion from Level 3 to Level 2, mainly related to structured debt, reflecting certain


182



unobservable inputs becoming less significant and certain underlying market inputs being more observable.


183



Valuation Techniques and Inputs for Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present the valuation techniques covering the majority of Level 3 inventory and the most significant unobservable inputs used in Level 3 fair value measurements.
 
Differences between this table and amounts presented in the Level 3 Fair Value Rollforward table represent individually immaterial items that have been measured using a variety of valuation techniques other than those listed.

As of September 30, 2016
Fair value(1)
 (in millions)
Methodology
Input
Low(2)(3)
High(2)(3)
Weighted
average(4)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
$
1,313

Model-based
Interest rate
(0.47
)%
1.40
%
(0.39
)%
 
 
 
IR normal volatility
32.32
 %
80.41
%
68.61
 %
Mortgage-backed securities
$
659

Price-based
Price
$
6.65

$
118.45

$
75.90

 
547

Yield analysis
Yield
0.11
 %
16.08
%
4.19
 %
State and municipal, foreign government, corporate and other debt securities
$
3,595

Price-based
Price
$
7.00

$
106.00

$
93.73

 
1,699

Cash flow
Credit spread
35 bps

600 bps

228 bps

Equity securities(5)
$
3,404

Model-based
WAL
4 years

4 years

4 years

Asset-backed securities
$
3,285

Price-based
Price
$
6.25

$
100.00

$
73.98

Non-marketable equity
$
603

Comparables analysis
EBITDA multiples
7.00
x
10.40
x
8.66
x
 
539

Price-based
Discount to price
 %
73.80
%
11.23
 %
 
 
 
Price-to-book ratio
0.32
 %
2.10
%
1.11
 %
 
 
 
Price
$

$
113.23

$
39.02

Derivatives—gross(6)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts (gross)
$
7,228

Model-based
IR normal volatility
15.10
 %
75.30
%
56.39
 %
 
 
 
Mean reversion
1.00
 %
20.00
%
10.50
 %
Foreign exchange contracts (gross)
$
1,237

Model-based
Foreign exchange (FX) volatility
3.61
 %
25.47
%
9.84
 %
 
174

Cash flow
IR-IR correlation
40.00
 %
40.00
%
40.00
 %
 
 
 
IR-FX correlation
40.00
 %
60.00
%
50.00
 %
 
 
 
Credit spread
15 bps

537 bps

179 bps

Equity contracts (gross)(7)
$
3,562

Model-based
Equity volatility
0.37
 %
59.43
%
18.82
 %
 
 
 
Equity forward
66.94
 %
111.91
%
90.91
 %
 
 
 
Forward price
22.38
 %
104.46
%
98.37
 %
 
 
 
WAL
4 years

4 years

4 years

 
 
 
Equity-IR correlation
(35.00
)%
71.00
%
(11.50
)%
Commodity contracts (gross)
$
3,499

Model-based
Forward price
42.00
 %
387.95
%
133.57
 %
 
 
 
Commodity volatility
2.00
 %
49.32
%
21.38
 %
 
 
 
Commodity correlation
(43.68
)%
92.17
%
20.00
 %
Credit derivatives (gross)
$
3,482

Model-based
Recovery rate
15.27
 %
75.00
%
37.56
 %
 
1,449

Price-based
Credit correlation
5.00
 %
65.00
%
35.53
 %
 
 
 
Upfront points
10.11
 %
99.95
%
67.49
 %
 
 
 
Price
$
1.00

$
621.00

$
86.26

 
 
 
Credit spread
5 bps

1,613 bps

285 bps

Nontrading derivatives and other financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis (gross)(6)
$
99

Model-based
Redemption rate
5.05
 %
99.50
%
73.31
 %
 
 
 
Interest rate
0.36
 %
0.38
%
0.37
 %
Loans
$
455

Model-based
Price
$

$
111.68

$
11.12

 
395

Price-based
Credit spread
4 bps

500 bps

76 bps

 
222

Yield Analysis
Yield
1.75
 %
4.40
%
2.92
 %
Mortgage servicing rights
$
1,178

Cash flow
Yield
1.62
 %
18.52
%
8.64
 %
 


 
WAL
3.17 years

6.07 years

4.77 years


184



As of September 30, 2016
Fair value(1)
 (in millions)
Methodology
Input
Low(2)(3)
High(2)(3)
Weighted
average(4)
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits
$
260

Model-based
Mean reversion
1.00
 %
20.00
%
10.50
 %
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
$
923

Model-based
Interest rate
0.15
 %
1.40
%
1.11
 %
Trading account liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities sold, not yet purchased
$
195

Price-based
Price
$

$
621.00

$
86.97

 
 
 
Forward price
42.00
 %
387.95
%
131.84
 %
 
 
 
Commodity correlation
(43.68
)%
92.17
%
20.00
 %
 
 
 
Commodity volatility
2.00
 %
49.32
%
21.30
 %
Short-term borrowings and long-term debt
$
9,241

Model-based
Equity volatility
7.55
 %
41.94
%
19.85
 %
 
 
 
Mean Reversion
1.00
 %
20.00
%
10.49
 %
 
 
 
Forward price
88.11
 %
198.89
%
113.04
 %
 
 
 
Commodity correlation
(43.68
)%
92.17
%
20.00
 %
 
 
 
Commodity volatility
2.00
 %
49.32
%
21.38
 %
As of December 31, 2015
Fair value(1)
 (in millions)
Methodology
Input
Low(2)(3)
High(2)(3)
Weighted
average(4)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
$
1,337

Model-based
IR log-normal volatility
29.02
 %
137.02
%
37.90
 %
 
 
 
Interest rate
 %
2.03
%
0.27
 %
Mortgage-backed securities
$
1,287

Price-based
Price
$
3.45

$
109.21

$
78.25

 
1,377

Yield analysis
Yield
0.50
 %
14.07
%
4.83
 %
State and municipal, foreign government, corporate and other debt securities
$
3,761

Price-based
Price
$

$
217.00

$
79.41

 
1,719

Cash flow
Credit spread
20 bps

600 bps

251 bps

Equity securities(5)
$
3,499

Model-based
WAL
1.5 years

1.5 years

1.5 years

 
 
 
Redemption rate
41.21
 %
41.21
%
41.21
 %
Asset-backed securities
$
3,075

Price-based
Price
$
5.55

$
100.21

$
71.57

Non-marketable equity
$
633

Comparables analysis
EBITDA multiples
6.80
x
10.80
x
9.05
x
 
473

Price-based
Discount to price
 %
90.00
%
10.89
 %
 
 
 
Price-to-book ratio
0.19
x
1.09
x
0.60
x
 
 
 
Price
$

$
132.78

$
46.66

Derivatives—gross(6)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate contracts (gross)
$
4,553

Model-based
IR log-normal volatility
17.41
 %
137.02
%
37.60
 %
 
 
 
Mean reversion
(5.52
)%
20.00
%
0.71
 %
Foreign exchange contracts (gross)
$
1,326

Model-based
Foreign exchange (FX) volatility
0.38
 %
25.73
%
11.63
 %
 
275

Cash flow
Interest rate
7.50
 %
7.50
%
7.50
 %
 
 
 
Forward price
1.48
 %
138.09
%
56.80
 %
 
 
 
Credit spread
3 bps

515 bps

235 bps

 
 
 
IR-IR correlation
(51.00
)%
77.94
%
32.91
 %
 
 
 
IR-FX correlation
(20.30
)%
60.00
%
48.85
 %
Equity contracts (gross)(7)
$
3,976

Model-based
Equity volatility
11.87
 %
49.57
%
27.33
 %
 
 
 
Equity-FX correlation
(88.17
)%
65.00
%
(21.09
)%
 
 
 
Equity forward
82.72
 %
100.53
%
95.20
 %
 
 
 
Equity-equity correlation
(80.54
)%
100.00
%
49.54
 %
Commodity contracts (gross)
$
4,061

Model-based
Forward price
35.09
 %
299.32
%
112.98
 %

185



As of December 31, 2015
Fair value(1)
 (in millions)
Methodology
Input
Low(2)(3)
High(2)(3)
Weighted
average(4)
 
 
 
Commodity volatility
5.00
 %
83.00
%
24.00
 %
 
 
 
Commodity correlation
(57.00
)%
91.00
%
30.00
 %
Credit derivatives (gross)
$
5,849

Model-based
Recovery rate
1.00
 %
75.00
%
32.49
 %
 
1,424

Price-based
Credit correlation
5.00
 %
90.00
%
43.48
 %
 
 
 
Price
$
0.33

$
101.00

$
61.52

 
 
 
Credit spread
1 bps

967 bps

133 bps

 
 
 
Upfront points
7.00
 %
99.92
%
66.75
 %
Nontrading derivatives and other financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis (gross)(6)
$
194

Model-based
Recovery rate
7.00
 %
40.00
%
10.72
 %
 
 
 
Redemption rate
27.00
 %
99.50
%
74.80
 %
 
 
 
Interest rate
5.26
 %
5.28
%
5.27
 %
Loans
$
750

Price-based
Yield
1.50
 %
4.50
%
2.52
 %
 
892

Model-based
Price
$

$
106.98

$
40.69

 
524

Cash flow
Credit spread
29 bps

500 bps

105 bps

Mortgage servicing rights
$
1,690

Cash flow
Yield
 %
23.32
%
6.83
 %
 
 
 
WAL
3.38 years

7.48 years

5.5 years

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits
$
434

Model-based
Equity-IR correlation
23.00
 %
39.00
%
34.51
 %
 
 
 
Forward price
35.09
 %
299.32
%
112.72
 %
 
 
 
Commodity correlation
(57.00
)%
91.00
%
30.00
 %
 
 
 
Commodity volatility
5.00
 %
83.00
%
24.00
 %
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
$
1,245

Model-based
Interest rate
1.27
 %
2.02
%
1.92
 %
Trading account liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Securities sold, not yet purchased
$
152

Price-based
Price
$

$
217.00

$
87.78

Short-term borrowings and long-term debt
$
7,004

Model-based
Mean reversion
(5.52
)%
20.00
%
7.80
 %
 
 
 
Equity volatility
9.55
 %
42.56
%
22.26
 %
 
 
 
Equity forward
82.72
 %
100.80
%
94.48
 %
 
 
 
Equity-equity correlation
(80.54
)%
100.00
%
49.16
 %
 
 
 
Forward price
35.09
 %
299.32
%
106.32
 %
 
 
 
Equity-FX correlation
(88.20
)%
56.85
%
(31.76
)%
(1)
The fair value amounts presented in these tables represent the primary valuation technique or techniques for each class of assets or liabilities.
(2)
Some inputs are shown as zero due to rounding.
(3)
When the low and high inputs are the same, there is either a constant input applied to all positions, or the methodology involving the input applies to only one large position.
(4)
Weighted averages are calculated based on the fair values of the instruments.
(5)
For equity securities, the price and fund NAV inputs are expressed on an absolute basis, not as a percentage of the notional amount.
(6)
Both trading and nontrading account derivatives—assets and liabilities—are presented on a gross absolute value basis.
(7)
Includes hybrid products.




186



Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above. These include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during the periods as a result of an impairment. In addition, these assets include loans held-for-sale and other real estate owned that are measured at the lower of cost or market.
The following table presents the carrying amounts of all assets that were still held for which a nonrecurring fair value measurement was recorded during the three months ended:
In millions of dollars
Fair value
Level 2
Level 3
September 30, 2016
 
 
 
Loans held-for-sale
$
8,665

$
6,677

$
1,988

Other real estate owned
80

17

63

Loans(1)
983

519

464

Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
$
9,728

$
7,213

$
2,515

In millions of dollars
Fair value
Level 2
Level 3
December 31, 2015
 
 
 
Loans held-for-sale
$
10,326

$
6,752

$
3,574

Other real estate owned
107

15

92

Loans(1)
1,173

836

337

Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
$
11,606

$
7,603

$
4,003

(1)
Represents impaired loans held for investment whose carrying amount is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, primarily real estate secured loans.




187



Valuation Techniques and Inputs for Level 3 Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present the valuation techniques covering the majority of Level 3 nonrecurring fair value measurements and the most significant unobservable inputs used in those measurements:
As of September 30, 2016
Fair value(1)
 (in millions)
Methodology
Input
Low(5)
High
Weighted
average(2)
Loans held-for-sale
$
1,988

Price-based
Price
$

$
100.00

$
93.47

Other real estate owned
$
62

Price-based
Discount to price(4)
0.34
%
13.00
%
2.96
%
 
 
 
Price
58.91

68.50

59.42

Loans(3)
$
347

Cashflow
Price
$
3.00

$
105.00

$
55.67

 
278

Price-based
Discount to price(4)
13.00
%
13.00
%
13.00
%
(1)
The fair value amounts presented in this table represent the primary valuation technique or techniques for each class of assets or liabilities.
(2)
Weighted averages are calculated based on the fair values of the instruments.
(3)
Represents loans held for investment whose carrying amounts are based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.
(4)
Includes estimated costs to sell.
(5)
Some inputs are shown as zero due to rounding.

As of December 31, 2015
Fair value(1)
 (in millions)
Methodology
Input
Low(5)
High
Weighted
average(2)
Loans held-for-sale
$
3,486

Price-based
Price
$

$
100.00

$
81.05

Other real estate owned
$
90

Price-based
Discount to price(4)
0.34
%
13.00
%
2.86
%
 
2

 
Appraised value
$

$
8,518,230

$
3,813,045

Loans(3)
$
157

Recovery analysis
Recovery rate
11.79
%
60.00
%
23.49
%
 
87

Price-based
Discount to price(4)
13.00
%
34.00
%
7.99
%

(1)
The fair value amounts presented in this table represent the primary valuation technique or techniques for each class of assets or liabilities.
(2)
Weighted averages are calculated based on the fair values of the instruments.
(3)
Represents loans held for investment whose carrying amounts are based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.
(4)
Includes estimated costs to sell.
(5)
Some inputs are shown as zero due to rounding.


Nonrecurring Fair Value Changes
The following table presents total nonrecurring fair value measurements for the period, included in earnings, attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets that were still held:
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
Loans held-for-sale
$
(17
)
$
(7
)
Other real estate owned
(4
)
(5
)
Loans(1)
(42
)
(72
)
Total nonrecurring fair value gains (losses)
$
(63
)
$
(84
)
(1)
Represents loans held for investment whose carrying amount is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, primarily real estate loans.

 

 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
Loans held-for-sale
$
(15
)
$
(7
)
Other real estate owned
(6
)
(12
)
Loans(1)
(110
)
(220
)
Total nonrecurring fair value gains (losses)
$
(131
)
$
(239
)
(1)
Represents loans held for investment whose carrying amount is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral, primarily real estate loans.
(2)
Represents net impairment losses related to an equity investment.


188



Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value
The table below presents the carrying value and fair value of Citigroup’s financial instruments that are not carried at fair value. The table below therefore excludes items measured at fair value on a recurring basis presented in the tables above.


 
September 30, 2016
Estimated fair value
 
Carrying
value
Estimated
fair value
 
 
 
In billions of dollars
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
Investments
$
44.8

$
46.1

$
1.6

$
42.6

$
1.9

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
92.4

92.4


86.2

6.2

Loans(1)(2)
620.1

617.9


8.4

609.5

Other financial assets(2)(3)
214.6

214.6

7.2

148.8

58.6

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
$
938.8

$
937.3

$

$
781.9

$
155.4

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
110.2

110.2


109.6

0.6

Long-term debt(4)
181.5

186.3


156.1

30.2

Other financial liabilities(5)
115.3

115.3


15.7

99.6


 
December 31, 2015
Estimated fair value
 
Carrying
value
Estimated
fair value
 
 
 
In billions of dollars
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
Investments
$
41.7

$
42.7

$
3.5

$
36.4

$
2.8

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
81.7

81.7


77.4

4.3

Loans(1)(2)
597.5

599.4


6.0

593.4

Other financial assets(2)(3)
186.5

186.5

6.9

126.2

53.4

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
Deposits
$
906.3

$
896.7

$

$
749.4

$
147.3

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
109.7

109.7


109.4

0.3

Long-term debt(4)
176.0

180.8


153.8

27.0

Other financial liabilities(5)
97.6

97.6


18.0

79.6

(1)
The carrying value of loans is net of the Allowance for loan losses of $12.4 billion for September 30, 2016 and $12.6 billion for December 31, 2015. In addition, the carrying values exclude $1.9 billion and $2.4 billion of lease finance receivables at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
(2)
Includes items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
(3)
Includes cash and due from banks, deposits with banks, brokerage receivables, reinsurance recoverable and other financial instruments included in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for all of which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
(4)
The carrying value includes long-term debt balances under qualifying fair value hedges.
(5)
Includes brokerage payables, separate and variable accounts, short-term borrowings (carried at cost) and other financial instruments included in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for all of which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s corporate unfunded lending commitments at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were liabilities of $4.4 billion and $7.0 billion, respectively, substantially all of which are classified as Level 3. The Company does not estimate the fair values of consumer unfunded lending commitments, which are generally cancellable by providing notice to the borrower.



189



21.   FAIR VALUE ELECTIONS
The Company may elect to report most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in earnings, other than DVA (see below). The election is made upon the initial recognition of an eligible financial asset, financial liability or firm commitment or when certain specified reconsideration events occur. The fair value election may not be revoked once made. The changes in fair value are
 
recorded in current earnings, other than DVA, which from January 1, 2016 is reported in AOCI. Additional discussion regarding the applicable areas in which fair value elections were made is presented in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company has elected fair value accounting for its mortgage servicing rights. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of MSRs.


The following table presents the changes in fair value of those items for which the fair value option has been elected:
 
Changes in fair value gains (losses) for the
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars
2016
2015
2016
2015
Assets
 
 
 
 
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
     selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements
     to resell and securities borrowed
$
(54
)
$
1

$
(7
)
$
(92
)
Trading account assets
571

(676
)
509

(449
)
Investments
(4
)
3

(25
)
52

Loans
 
 


Certain corporate loans(1)
5

(164
)
65

(173
)
Certain consumer loans(1)
1



2

Total loans
$
6

$
(164
)
$
65

$
(171
)
Other assets
 
 


MSRs
$
13

$
(140
)
$
(349
)
$
51

Certain mortgage loans held for sale(2)
100

95

271

267

Other assets
6


376


Total other assets
$
119

$
(45
)
$
298

$
318

Total assets
$
638

$
(881
)
$
840

$
(342
)
Liabilities
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits
$
(16
)
$
(107
)
$
(84
)
$
(74
)
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase
selected portfolios of securities sold under agreements to repurchase and securities loaned
32

(5
)
24

(3
)
Trading account liabilities
4

(51
)
101

(66
)
Short-term borrowings
(173
)
14

(207
)
(54
)
Long-term debt
(305
)
246

(845
)
701

Total liabilities
$
(458
)
$
97

$
(1,011
)
$
504

(1)
Includes mortgage loans held by mortgage loan securitization VIEs consolidated upon the adoption of ASC 810, Consolidation (SFAS 167), on January 1, 2010.
(2)
Includes gains (losses) associated with interest rate lock-commitments for those loans that have been originated and elected under the fair value option.

190



Own Debt Valuation Adjustments (DVA)
Own debt valuation adjustments are recognized on Citi’s liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected by reference to Citi’s credit spreads observed in the bond market. Among other variables, the fair value of liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected (other than non-recourse and similar liabilities) is impacted by the narrowing or widening of the Company’s credit spreads.
The estimated change in the fair value of these liabilities due to such changes in the Company’s own credit spread (or instrument-specific credit risk) was a loss of $319 million and a gain of $264 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, and gains of $8 million and $582 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Changes in fair value resulting from changes in instrument-specific credit risk were estimated by incorporating the Company’s current credit spreads observable in the bond market into the relevant valuation technique used to value each liability as described above. Effective January 1, 2016, changes in fair value of fair value option liabilities related to changes in Citigroup’s own credit spreads (DVA) are reflected as a component of AOCI; previously these amounts were recognized in Citigroup’s Revenues and Net income along with all other changes in fair value. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

Selected Portfolios of Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell, Securities Borrowed, Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase, Securities Loaned and Certain Non-Collateralized Short-Term Borrowings
The Company elected the fair value option for certain portfolios of fixed-income securities purchased under agreements to resell and fixed-income securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities borrowed, securities loaned, and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings held primarily by broker-dealer entities in the United States, United Kingdom and Japan. In each case, the election was made because the related interest-rate risk is managed on a portfolio basis, primarily with offsetting derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings.
 
Changes in fair value for transactions in these portfolios are recorded in Principal transactions. The related interest revenue and interest expense are measured based on the contractual rates specified in the transactions and are reported as interest revenue and expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Certain Loans and Other Credit Products
Citigroup has also elected the fair value option for certain other originated and purchased loans, including certain unfunded loan products, such as guarantees and letters of credit, executed by Citigroup’s lending and trading businesses. None of these credit products are highly leveraged financing commitments. Significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term, or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments, such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the Company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party. Citigroup has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. Fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the Company.

The following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value:
 
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Trading assets
Loans
Trading assets
Loans
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
$
9,561

$
3,970

$
9,314

$
5,005

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value
700

47

980

280

Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

1

5

2

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

1

13

1

In addition to the amounts reported above, $1,463 million and $2,113 million of unfunded commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair value accounting were
 
outstanding as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.


191



Changes in the fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in Principal transactions in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as Interest revenue on Trading account assets or loan interest depending on the balance sheet classifications of the credit products. The changes in fair value for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a gain of $83 million and loss of $203 million, respectively.

Certain Investments in Unallocated Precious Metals
Citigroup invests in unallocated precious metals accounts (gold, silver, platinum and palladium) as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities or to economically hedge certain exposures from issuing structured liabilities. Under ASC 815, the investment is bifurcated into a debt host contract and a commodity forward derivative instrument. Citigroup elects the fair value option for the debt host contract, and reports the debt host contract within Trading account assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. The total carrying amount of debt host contracts across unallocated precious metals accounts was approximately $0.7 billion and $0.6 billion at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The amounts are expected to fluctuate based on trading activity in future periods.
As part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities, Citi trades unallocated precious metals investments and executes forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts with trading counterparties. When Citi sells an unallocated precious metals investment, Citi’s receivable from its depository bank is repaid and Citi derecognizes its investment in the unallocated precious metal. The forward purchase or sale contract with the trading counterparty indexed to unallocated precious metals is accounted for as a derivative, at fair value through earnings. As of September 30, 2016, there were approximately $18.2 billion and $14.6 billion notional amounts of such forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts outstanding, respectively.

 
Certain Investments in Private Equity and Real Estate Ventures and Certain Equity Method and Other Investments
Citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation. The Company has elected the fair value option for certain of these ventures, because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in Citi’s investment companies, which are reported at fair value. The fair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of these investments. All investments (debt and equity) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value. These investments are classified as Investments on Citigroup’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in Other revenue in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income.
Citigroup also elects the fair value option for certain non-marketable equity securities whose risk is managed with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. These securities are classified as Trading account assets on Citigroup’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in the fair value of these securities and the related derivative instruments are recorded in Principal transactions.

Certain Mortgage Loans Held for Sale (HFS)
Citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans HFS. These loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments. The Company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications.


The following table provides information about certain mortgage loans HFS carried at fair value:
In millions of dollars
September 30,
2016
December 31, 2015
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
$
1,031

$
745

Aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance
39

20

Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due


Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due


The changes in the fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in Other revenue in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. There was no net change in fair value during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 due to instrument-specific credit risk. Related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as Interest revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income.


192



Certain Structured Liabilities
The Company has elected the fair value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation, currency, equity, referenced credit or commodity risks. The Company elected the fair value option, because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair value basis. These positions will continue to be classified as debt, deposits or derivatives (Trading account liabilities) on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form.

The following table provides information about the carrying value of structured notes, disaggregated by type of embedded derivative instrument:
In billions of dollars
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
Interest rate linked
$
11.0

$
9.6

Foreign exchange linked
0.2

0.3

Equity linked
12.1

9.9

Commodity linked
1.1

1.4

Credit linked
0.9

1.6

Total
$
25.3

$
22.8

Prior to 2016, the total change in the fair value of these structured liabilities was reported in Principal transactions in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. Beginning in the first quarter of 2016, the portion of the changes in fair value attributable to changes in Citigroup’s own credit spreads (DVA) are reflected as a component of AOCI while all other changes in fair value will continue to be reported in Principal transactions. Changes in the fair value of these structured liabilities include accrued interest, which is also included in the change in fair value reported in Principal transactions.

 
Certain Non-Structured Liabilities
The Company has elected the fair value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates. The Company has elected the fair value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities may be economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings. The elections have been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications. These positions are reported in Short-term borrowings and Long-term debt on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. Prior to 2016, the total change in the fair value of these non-structured liabilities was reported in Principal transactions in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. Beginning in the first quarter of 2016, the portion of the changes in fair value attributable to changes in Citigroup’s own credit spreads (DVA) are reflected as a component of AOCI while all other changes in fair value will continue to be reported in Principal transactions.
Interest expense on non-structured liabilities is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.


The following table provides information about long-term debt carried at fair value:
In millions of dollars
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
$
27,535

$
25,293

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of (less than) fair value
(148
)
1,569

The following table provides information about short-term borrowings carried at fair value:
In millions of dollars
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet
$
2,599

$
1,207

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of (less than) fair value
(52
)
130


193



22.   GUARANTEES AND COMMITMENTS
Citi provides a variety of guarantees and indemnifications to its customers to enhance their credit standing and enable them to complete a wide variety of business transactions. For
certain contracts meeting the definition of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize, at inception, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee.
In addition, the guarantor must disclose the maximum potential amount of future payments that the guarantor could be required to make under the guarantee, if there were a total
default by the guaranteed parties. The determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible
 
recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. As such, Citi believes such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees. For additional information regarding Citi’s guarantees and indemnifications included in the tables below, as well as its other guarantees and indemnifications excluded from the tables below, see Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following tables present information about Citi’s guarantees at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:


 
Maximum potential amount of future payments
 
In billions of dollars at September 30, 2016 except carrying value in millions
Expire within
1 year
Expire after
1 year
Total amount
outstanding
Carrying value
 (in millions of dollars)
Financial standby letters of credit
$
25.8

$
69.3

$
95.1

$
170

Performance guarantees
7.7

3.8

11.5

19

Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees
4.5

78.4

82.9

954

Loans sold with recourse

0.2

0.2

13

Securities lending indemnifications(1)
83.9


83.9


Credit card merchant processing(1)(2)
83.3


83.3


Credit card arrangements with partners

1.5

1.5

206

Custody indemnifications and other
0.1

47.1

47.2

58

Total
$
205.3

$
200.3

$
405.6

$
1,420

 
Maximum potential amount of future payments
 
In billions of dollars at December 31, 2015 except carrying value in millions
Expire within
1 year
Expire after
1 year
Total amount
outstanding
Carrying value
 (in millions of dollars)
Financial standby letters of credit
$
23.8

$
73.0

$
96.8

$
152

Performance guarantees
7.4

4.1

11.5

23

Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees
3.6

74.9

78.5

1,779

Loans sold with recourse

0.2

0.2

17

Securities lending indemnifications(1)
79.0


79.0


Credit card merchant processing(1)(2)
84.2


84.2


Custody indemnifications and other

51.7

51.7

56

Total
$
198.0

$
203.9

$
401.9

$
2,027

(1)
The carrying values of securities lending indemnifications and credit card merchant processing were not material for either period presented, as the probability of potential liabilities arising from these guarantees is minimal.
(2)
At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, this maximum potential exposure was estimated to be $83 billion and $84 billion, respectively. However, Citi believes that the maximum exposure is not representative of the actual potential loss exposure based on its historical experience. This contingent liability is unlikely to arise, as most products and services are delivered when purchased and amounts are refunded when items are returned to merchants.











 













194



Loans sold with recourse
Loans sold with recourse represent Citi’s obligations to
reimburse the buyers for loan losses under certain
circumstances. Recourse refers to the clause in a sales
agreement under which a seller/lender will fully reimburse
the buyer/investor for any losses resulting from the
purchased loans. This may be accomplished by the seller’s
taking back any loans that become delinquent.
In addition to the amounts shown in the tables above,
Citi has recorded a repurchase reserve for its potential
repurchases or make-whole liability regarding residential
mortgage representation and warranty claims related to its
whole loan sales to the U.S. government-sponsored
enterprises (GSEs) and, to a lesser extent, private investors.
The repurchase reserve was approximately $114 million and
$152 million at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015,
respectively, and these amounts are included in Other
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Credit card arrangements with partners
Citi, in certain of its credit card partner arrangements,
provides guarantees to the partner regarding the volume of
certain customer originations during the term of the
agreement. To the extent such origination targets are not met,
the guarantees serve to compensate the partner for certain
payments that otherwise would have been generated in
connection with such originations.

Other guarantees and indemnifications

Credit Card Protection Programs
Citi, through its credit card businesses, provides various
cardholder protection programs on several of its card
products, including programs that provide insurance
coverage for rental cars, coverage for certain losses
associated with purchased products, price protection for
certain purchases and protection for lost luggage. These
guarantees are not included in the table, since the total
outstanding amount of the guarantees and Citi’s maximum
exposure to loss cannot be quantified. The protection is
limited to certain types of purchases and losses, and it is not
possible to quantify the purchases that would qualify for
these benefits at any given time. Citi assesses the probability
and amount of its potential liability related to these programs
based on the extent and nature of its historical loss
experience. At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the actual and estimated losses incurred and the carrying value of Citi’s obligations related to these programs were
immaterial.

Value-Transfer Networks
Citi is a member of, or shareholder in, hundreds of value transfer networks (VTNs) (payment, clearing and settlement
systems as well as exchanges) around the world. As a
condition of membership, many of these VTNs require that
members stand ready to pay a pro rata share of the losses
incurred by the organization due to another member’s default
on its obligations. Citi’s potential obligations may be limited
to its membership interests in the VTNs, contributions to the
 
VTN’s funds, or, in limited cases, the obligation may be unlimited. The maximum exposure cannot be estimated as
this would require an assessment of future claims that have
not yet occurred. Citi believes the risk of loss is remote
given historical experience with the VTNs. Accordingly,
Citi’s participation in VTNs is not reported in the guarantees
tables above, and there are no amounts reflected on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2016 or
December 31, 2015 for potential obligations that could arise
from Citi’s involvement with VTN associations.

Long-Term Care Insurance Indemnification
In the sale of an insurance subsidiary, the Company provided
an indemnification to an insurance company for policyholder
claims and other liabilities relating to a book of long-term
care (LTC) business (for the entire term of the LTC policies)
that is fully reinsured by another insurance company. The
reinsurer has funded two trusts with securities whose fair
value (approximately $7.4 billion at September 30, 2016,
compared to $6.3 billion at December 31, 2015) is designed
to cover the insurance company’s statutory liabilities for the
LTC policies. The assets in these trusts are evaluated and
adjusted periodically to ensure that the fair value of the
assets continues to cover the estimated statutory liabilities
related to the LTC policies, as those statutory liabilities
change over time.
If the reinsurer fails to perform under the reinsurance
agreement for any reason, including insolvency, and the
assets in the two trusts are insufficient or unavailable to the
ceding insurance company, then Citi must indemnify the
ceding insurance company for any losses actually incurred in
connection with the LTC policies. Since both events would
have to occur before Citi would become responsible for any
payment to the ceding insurance company pursuant to its
indemnification obligation, and the likelihood of such events
occurring is currently not probable, there is no liability
reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 related to this indemnification. Citi continues to closely monitor its potential exposure under this indemnification obligation.

Futures and over-the-counter derivatives clearing
Citi provides clearing services for clients executing
exchange-traded futures and over-the-counter (OTC)
derivatives contracts with central counterparties (CCPs).
Based on all relevant facts and circumstances, Citi has
concluded that it acts as an agent for accounting purposes in
its role as clearing member for these client transactions. As
such, Citi does not reflect the underlying exchange-traded
futures or OTC derivatives contracts in its Consolidated
Financial Statements. See Note 19 for a discussion of Citi’s
derivatives activities that are reflected in its Consolidated
Financial Statements.
As a clearing member, Citi collects and remits cash and securities collateral (margin) between its clients and the
respective CCP. There are two types of margin: initial
margin and variation margin. Where Citi obtains benefits
from or controls cash initial margin (e.g., retains an interest
spread), cash initial margin collected from clients and


195



remitted to the CCP is reflected within Brokerage Payables (payables to customers) and Brokerage Receivables
(receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing
organizations), respectively. However, for OTC derivatives
contracts where Citi has contractually agreed with the client
that (a) Citi will pass through to the client all interest paid by
the CCP on cash initial margin; (b) Citi will not utilize its
right as a clearing member to transform cash margin into
other assets; and (c) Citi does not guarantee and is not liable
to the client for the performance of the CCP, cash initial
margin collected from clients and remitted to the CCP is not
reflected on Citi’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. The total
amount of cash initial margin collected and remitted in this
manner was approximately $6.0 billion and $4.3 billion as of
September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.
Variation margin due from clients to the respective CCP, or from the CCP to clients, reflects changes in the value of the client’s derivative contracts for each trading day. As a clearing member, Citi is exposed to the risk of nonperformance by clients (e.g., failure of a client to post
variation margin to the CCP for negative changes in the
value of the client’s derivative contracts). In the event of
non-performance by a client, Citi would move to close out
the client’s positions. The CCP would typically utilize initial
margin posted by the client and held by the CCP, with any
remaining shortfalls required to be paid by Citi as clearing
member. Citi generally holds incremental cash or securities
margin posted by the client, which would typically be
expected to be sufficient to mitigate Citi’s credit risk in the
event the client fails to perform.
As required by ASC 860-30-25-5, securities collateral posted by clients is not recognized on Citi’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.



 
Carrying Value—Guarantees and Indemnifications
At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the total carrying amounts of the liabilities related to the guarantees and indemnifications included in the tables above amounted
to approximately $1.4 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively. The carrying value of financial and performance guarantees is included in Other liabilities. For loans sold with recourse,
the carrying value of the liability is included in Other
liabilities.

Collateral
Cash collateral available to Citi to reimburse losses realized under these guarantees and indemnifications amounted to $52 billion at both September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Securities and other marketable assets held as collateral amounted to $37 billion and $33 billion at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The majority of collateral is held to reimburse losses realized under securities lending indemnifications. Additionally, letters of credit in favor of Citi held as collateral amounted to $4.1 billion and $4.2 billion at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Other property may also be available to Citi to cover losses under certain guarantees and indemnifications; however, the value of such property has not been determined.

Performance risk
Presented in the tables below are the maximum potential amounts of future payments that are classified based upon internal and external credit ratings as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. As such, Citi believes such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.




 
Maximum potential amount of future payments
In billions of dollars at September 30, 2016
Investment
grade
Non-investment
grade
Not
rated
Total
Financial standby letters of credit
$
68.4

$
14.1

$
12.6

$
95.1

Performance guarantees
6.5

4.1

0.9

11.5

Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees


82.9

82.9

Loans sold with recourse


0.2

0.2

Securities lending indemnifications


83.9

83.9

Credit card merchant processing


83.3

83.3

Credit card arrangements with partners


1.5

1.5

Custody indemnifications and other
47.1

0.1


47.2

Total
$
122.0

$
18.3

$
265.3

$
405.6



196



 
Maximum potential amount of future payments
In billions of dollars at December 31, 2015
Investment
grade
Non-investment
grade
Not
rated
Total
Financial standby letters of credit
$
69.2

$
15.4

$
12.2

$
96.8

Performance guarantees
6.6

4.1

0.8

11.5

Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees


78.5

78.5

Loans sold with recourse


0.2

0.2

Securities lending indemnifications


79.0

79.0

Credit card merchant processing


84.2

84.2

Custody indemnifications and other
51.6

0.1


51.7

Total
$
127.4

$
19.6

$
254.9

$
401.9



Credit Commitments and Lines of Credit
In millions of dollars
U.S.
Outside of 
U.S.
September 30,
2016
December 31,
2015
Commercial and similar letters of credit
$
1,268

$
4,209

$
5,477

$
6,102

One- to four-family residential mortgages
1,644

1,810

3,454

3,196

Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties
11,939

1,621

13,560

14,726

Commercial real estate, construction and land development
8,414

1,593

10,007

10,522

Credit card lines
571,251

99,088

670,339

573,057

Commercial and other consumer loan commitments
161,524

91,791

253,315

271,076

Other commitments and contingencies
2,477

9,021

11,498

9,982

Total
$
758,517

$
209,133

$
967,650

$
888,661


The majority of unused commitments are contingent upon customers’ maintaining specific credit standards.
Commercial commitments generally have floating interest rates and fixed expiration dates and may require payment of fees. Such fees (net of certain direct costs) are deferred and, upon exercise of the commitment, amortized over the life of the loan or, if exercise is deemed remote, amortized over the commitment period.




197



23.   CONTINGENCIES

The following information supplements and amends, as applicable, the disclosures in Note 28 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of each of Citigroup’s First Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q and Second Quarter of 2016 Form 10-Q. For purposes of this Note, Citigroup, its affiliates and subsidiaries and current and former officers, directors and employees, are sometimes collectively referred to as Citigroup and Related Parties.
In accordance with ASC 450, Citigroup establishes accruals for contingencies, including the litigation and regulatory matters disclosed herein, when Citigroup believes it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, accruals are adjusted from time to time, as appropriate, in light of additional information. The amount of loss ultimately incurred in relation to those matters may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those matters.
If Citigroup has not accrued for a matter because the matter does not meet the criteria for accrual (as set forth above), or Citigroup believes an exposure to loss exists in excess of the amount accrued for a particular matter, in each case assuming a material loss is reasonably possible, Citigroup discloses the matter. In addition, for such matters, Citigroup discloses an estimate of the aggregate reasonably possible loss or range of loss in excess of the amounts accrued for those matters as to which an estimate can be made. At September 30, 2016, Citigroup’s estimate was materially unchanged from its estimate of approximately $3.0 billion in the aggregate as of June 30, 2016.
As available information changes, the matters for which Citigroup is able to estimate will change, and the estimates themselves will change. In addition, while many estimates presented in financial statements and other financial disclosures involve significant judgment and may be subject to significant uncertainty, estimates of the range of reasonably possible loss arising from litigation and regulatory proceedings are subject to particular uncertainties. For example, at the time of making an estimate, Citigroup may have only preliminary, incomplete or inaccurate information about the facts underlying the claim; its assumptions about the future rulings of the court or other tribunal on significant issues, or the behavior and incentives of adverse parties or regulators, may prove to be wrong; and the outcomes it is attempting to predict are often not amenable to the use of statistical or other quantitative analytical tools. In addition, from time to time an outcome may occur that Citigroup had not accounted for in its estimates because it had deemed such an outcome to be remote. For all these reasons, the amount of loss in excess of accruals ultimately incurred for the matters as to which an estimate has been made could be substantially higher or lower than the range of loss included in the estimate.
Subject to the foregoing, it is the opinion of Citigroup's management, based on current knowledge and after taking into account its current legal accruals, that the eventual outcome of all matters described in this Note would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition
 
of Citigroup. Nonetheless, given the substantial or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters and the inherent unpredictability of such matters, an adverse outcome in certain of these matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on Citigroup’s consolidated results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.
For further information on ASC 450 and Citigroup's accounting and disclosure framework for contingencies, including for litigation and regulatory matters disclosed herein, see Note 28 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Credit Crisis-Related Litigation and Other Matters
Mortgage Related Litigation and Other Matters
Mortgage Backed Security Repurchase Claims: The final payment of the settlement of representation and warranty claims reached with the trustees of 68 trusts established by Citigroup’s legacy Securities and Banking business during 2005–2008 was made in October 2016. Additional information concerning this proceeding is publicly available in court filings under docket number 653902/2014 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.) (Friedman, J.). 
Mortgage Backed Securities Trustee Actions: On August 5, 2016, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in the New York State Supreme Court action captioned FIXED INCOME SHARES: SERIES M, ET AL. v. CITIBANK N.A., which Citibank moved to dismiss on September 9, 2016. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 653891/2015 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.) (Ramos, J.).
On September 7, 2016, plaintiffs in the federal district court action captioned FIXED INCOME SHARES: SERIES M ET AL. v. CITIBANK N.A. submitted a stipulation of voluntary dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims as they relate to two of the three trusts in the action. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 14-cv-9373 (S.D.N.Y. (Furman, J.).
On September 30, 2016, Citibank’s motion to dismiss the action captioned FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE  CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR GUARANTY BANK v. CITIBANK N.A. was granted for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 15-cv-6574 (S.D.N.Y.) (Carter, J.).
Derivative Actions and Related Proceedings: On October 5, 2016, the court dismissed with prejudice plaintiff’s derivative complaint in IRA FOR THE BENEFIT OF VICTORIA SHAEV v. CORBAT, ET AL. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 652066/2016 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.) (Bransten, J.).

Lehman Brothers Bankruptcy Proceedings
On July 1, 2016, the bankruptcy court entered an order approving the parties’ settlement in LEHMAN BROTHERS FINANCE AG v. CITIBANK, N.A., ET AL. A stipulation of dismissal with prejudice was filed on July 26, 2016.  Additional information concerning this action is publicly


198



available in court filings under the docket numbers 14-02050 and 09-10583 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.) (Chapman, J.).

Tribune Company Bankruptcy
On September 9, 2016, Tribune noteholders filed a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court with respect to the order of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirming the dismissal of their state-law constructive fraudulent conveyance claims against various defendants, including certain Citigroup affiliates. Additional information concerning these actions is publicly available in court filings under the docket numbers 13-3992, 13-3875, 13-4178, and 13-4196 (2d Cir.).

Depositary Receipts Conversion Litigation 
Citigroup, Citibank and CGMI were sued by a purported class of persons or entities who, from January 2000 to the present, are or were holders of depositary receipts for which Citi served as the depositary bank and converted foreign-currency dividends or other distributions into U.S. dollars. Plaintiffs allege, among other things, that Citibank breached its deposit agreements by charging a spread for such conversions. Citi’s motion to dismiss was granted in part and denied in part on August 15, 2016, and only the breach of contract claim against Citibank survived the motion. Plaintiffs are seeking disgorgement of Citi’s profits, as well as compensatory, consequential and general damages. An appeal of the decision as it relates to standing and statute of limitations was filed on October 7, 2016. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 15 Civ. 9185 (S.D.N.Y.) (McMahon, C.).

Foreign Exchange Matters
Antitrust and Other Litigation: On October 5, 2016, a preliminary approval hearing was held with respect to the plaintiffs’ proposed plan of distribution and notice in the consolidated foreign exchange case. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 13 Civ. 7789 (S.D.N.Y.) (Schofield, J.).
On September 2, 2016, in NYPL v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., ET AL., Citigroup and Related Parties, along with other defendant banks, moved to dismiss the second amended complaint. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 15 Civ. 9300 (S.D.N.Y.) (Schofield, J.).
On September 20, 2016, in ALLEN v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL., plaintiffs and settling defendants in IN RE FOREIGN EXCHANGE BENCHMARK RATES ANTITRUST LITIGATION filed a joint stipulation dismissing plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket numbers 13 Civ. 7789 (S.D.N.Y.) (Schofield, J.) and 15 Civ. 4285 (S.D.N.Y.) (Schofield, J.).
On August 11, 2016, in WAH ET AL. v. HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC. ET AL., the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss. On September 28, 2016, the court permitted plaintiffs to move for leave to amend the
 
complaint by October 28, 2016. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 15 Civ. 8974 (S.D.N.Y.) (Schofield, J.).
On September 26, 2016, investors in exchange-traded funds (ETFs) commenced a suit captioned BAKER ET AL. v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION ET AL. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Citigroup, Citibank and CGMI, as well as various other banks. The complaint asserts claims under the Sherman Act, New York state antitrust law, and California state antitrust law and unfair competition law, based on alleged foreign exchange market collusion affecting ETF investments. The plaintiffs seek to certify nationwide, California and New York classes, and request damages and injunctive relief under the relevant statutes, including treble damages where applicable. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 16 Civ. 7512 (S.D.N.Y.) (Schofield, J.).
Derivative Actions and Related Proceedings: On August 15, 2016, plaintiffs in OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM, ET AL. v. CORBAT, ET AL. filed an amended complaint, which the defendants moved to dismiss on September 30, 2016. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number C.A. No. 12151-VCG (Del. Ch.) (Glasscock, Ch.).

Interbank Offered Rates-Related Litigation and Other Matters
Antitrust and Other Litigation: On July 6, 2016, in IN RE LIBOR-BASED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Citibank and Citigroup along with the other defendants moved to dismiss all antitrust claims based on the efficient enforcer doctrine. Additional information concerning these actions is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 11 MD 2262 (S.D.N.Y.) (Buchwald, J.).
On August 16, 2016, a complaint was filed against Citigroup, Citibank, and 16 other banks in an action captioned DENNIS, ET AL. v. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., ET AL. asserting common law claims, as well as violations of the Sherman Act, the Commodity Exchange Act, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. These claims are based on allegations that the banks conspired to manipulate the Bank Bill Swap Reference Rate. The plaintiffs are seeking injunctive relief, disgorgement, and damages, including treble damages where applicable. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 16 Civ. 06496 (S.D.N.Y.) (Kaplan, J.).

Interest Rate Swaps Matters
Regulatory Actions: The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission is conducting an investigation into the trading and clearing of interest rate swaps by investment banks. Citigroup is cooperating with the investigation.





199



Oceanografia Fraud and Related Matters
Other Litigation: On August 23, 2016, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in lieu of opposing Citigroup’s motion to dismiss the original complaint. In addition to re-alleging the claims that were asserted in the original complaint, the amended complaint also asserts common law claims for fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, and conspiracy on behalf of all plaintiffs. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 16-20725 (S.D. Fla.) (Gayles, J.).

Sovereign Securities Matters
Antitrust and Other Litigation: On October 12, 2016, a putative class action captioned LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION ET AL. was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Citigroup, Citibank, CGMI and CGML and various other banks. The plaintiff asserts claims under the Sherman Act based on the defendants' alleged manipulation of the supranational, sub-sovereign, and agency bond market, and seeks disgorgement and treble damages. Additional information concerning this action is publicly available in court filings under the docket number 16 Civ. 07991 (S.D.N.Y.) (Ramos, J.).

Settlement Payments
Payments required in settlement agreements described above have been made or are covered by existing litigation accruals.







 

24.   CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Citigroup amended its Registration Statement on Form S-3 on file with the SEC (File No. 33-192302) to add its wholly owned subsidiary, Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), as a co-registrant. Any securities issued by CGMHI under the Form S-3 will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.
The following are the Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 for Citigroup Inc., the parent holding company (Citigroup parent company), CGMHI, other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations and total consolidating adjustments. “Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations” includes all other subsidiaries of Citigroup, intercompany eliminations and income (loss) from discontinued operations. “Consolidating adjustments” includes Citigroup parent company elimination of distributed and undistributed income of subsidiaries and investment in subsidiaries.
These Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements have been prepared and presented in accordance with SEC Regulation S-X Rule 3-10, “Financial Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being Registered.”
These Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements schedules are presented for purposes of additional analysis, but should be considered in relation to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup taken as a whole.



























200



Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
 
CGMHI
 
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
 
Consolidating adjustments
 
Citigroup consolidated
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends from subsidiaries
$
4,000

 
$

 
$

 
$
(4,000
)
 
$

Interest revenue
2

 
1,158

 
13,493

 

 
14,653

Interest revenue—intercompany
695

 
148

 
(843
)
 

 

Interest expense
1,102

 
345

 
1,727

 

 
3,174

Interest expense—intercompany
61

 
401

 
(462
)
 

 

Net interest revenue
$
(466
)
 
$
560

 
$
11,385

 
$

 
$
11,479

Commissions and fees
$

 
$
1,062

 
$
1,582

 
$

 
$
2,644

Commissions and fees—intercompany

 
63

 
(63
)
 

 

Principal transactions
(1,103
)
 
1,600

 
1,741

 

 
2,238

Principal transactions—intercompany
977

 
(470
)
 
(507
)
 

 

Other income
482

 
51

 
866

 

 
1,399

Other income—intercompany
(501
)
 
51

 
450

 

 

Total non-interest revenues
$
(145
)
 
$
2,357

 
$
4,069

 
$

 
$
6,281

Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
3,389

 
$
2,917

 
$
15,454

 
$
(4,000
)
 
$
17,760

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$

 
$

 
$
1,736

 
$

 
$
1,736

Operating expenses

 

 
0
 

 

Compensation and benefits
$
26

 
$
1,150

 
$
4,027

 
$

 
$
5,203

Compensation and benefits—intercompany
8

 

 
(8
)
 

 

Other operating
(103
)
 
444

 
4,860

 

 
5,201

Other operating—intercompany
133

 
379

 
(512
)
 

 

Total operating expenses
$
64

 
$
1,973

 
$
8,367

 
$

 
$
10,404

Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
$
3,325

 
$
944

 
$
5,351

 
$
(4,000
)
 
$
5,620

Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(395
)
 
345

 
1,783

 

 
1,733

Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
120

 

 

 
(120
)
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
3,840

 
$
599

 
$
3,568

 
$
(4,120
)
 
$
3,887

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 
(30
)
 

 
(30
)
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
3,840

 
$
599

 
$
3,538

 
$
(4,120
)
 
$
3,857

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 
(9
)
 
26

 

 
17

Net income (loss) after attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
3,840

 
$
608

 
$
3,512

 
$
(4,120
)
 
$
3,840

Comprehensive income


 


 
$

 


 


Other comprehensive income (loss)
$
(1,078
)
 
$
(86
)
 
$
(1,019
)
 
$
1,105

 
$
(1,078
)
Comprehensive income
$
2,762

 
$
522

 
$
2,493

 
$
(3,015
)
 
$
2,762


201



Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
 
CGMHI
 
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
 
Consolidating adjustments
 
Citigroup consolidated
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends from subsidiaries
$
3,600

 
$

 
$

 
$
(3,600
)
 
$

Interest revenue
2

 
1,116

 
13,596

 

 
14,714

Interest revenue—intercompany
739

 
60

 
(799
)
 

 

Interest expense
1,121

 
236

 
1,584

 

 
2,941

Interest expense—intercompany
(80
)
 
334

 
(254
)
 

 

Net interest revenue
$
(300
)
 
$
606

 
$
11,467

 
$

 
$
11,773

Commissions and fees
$

 
$
1,043

 
$
1,689

 
$

 
$
2,732

Commissions and fees—intercompany

 
29

 
(29
)
 

 

Principal transactions
735

 
4,707

 
(4,115
)
 

 
1,327

Principal transactions—intercompany
(774
)
 
(4,418
)
 
5,192

 

 

Other income
(713
)
 
299

 
3,274

 

 
2,860

Other income—intercompany
1,012

 
464

 
(1,476
)
 

 

Total non-interest revenues
$
260

 
$
2,124

 
$
4,535

 
$

 
$
6,919

Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
3,560

 
$
2,730

 
$
16,002

 
$
(3,600
)
 
$
18,692

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$

 
$

 
$
1,836

 
$

 
$
1,836

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

Compensation and benefits
$
(70
)
 
$
1,253

 
$
4,138

 
$

 
$
5,321

Compensation and benefits—intercompany
24

 

 
(24
)
 

 

Other operating
70

 
514

 
4,764

 

 
5,348

Other operating—intercompany
36

 
298

 
(334
)
 

 

Total operating expenses
$
60

 
$
2,065

 
$
8,544

 
$

 
$
10,669

Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
$
3,500

 
$
665

 
$
5,622

 
$
(3,600
)
 
$
6,187

Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(60
)
 
293

 
1,648

 

 
1,881

Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
731

 

 

 
(731
)
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
4,291

 
$
372

 
$
3,974

 
$
(4,331
)
 
$
4,306

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 
(10
)
 

 
(10
)
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
4,291

 
$
372

 
$
3,964

 
$
(4,331
)
 
$
4,296

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 
9

 
(4
)
 

 
5

Net income (loss) after attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
4,291

 
$
363

 
$
3,968

 
$
(4,331
)
 
$
4,291

Comprehensive income


 


 


 


 


Other comprehensive income (loss)
$
(2,153
)
 
$
12

 
$
5,323

 
$
(5,335
)
 
$
(2,153
)
Comprehensive income
$
2,138

 
$
375

 
$
9,291

 
$
(9,666
)
 
$
2,138



202



Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
 
CGMHI
 
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
 
Consolidating adjustments
 
Citigroup consolidated
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends from subsidiaries
$
9,700

 
$

 
$

 
$
(9,700
)
 
$

Interest revenue
5

 
3,555

 
39,616

 

 
43,176

Interest revenue—intercompany
2,235

 
423

 
(2,658
)
 

 

Interest expense
3,266

 
1,110

 
4,858

 

 
9,234

Interest expense—intercompany
140

 
1,246

 
(1,386
)
 

 

Net interest revenue
$
(1,166
)
 
$
1,622

 
$
33,486

 
$

 
$
33,942

Commissions and fees
$

 
$
3,141

 
$
4,691

 
$

 
$
7,832

Commissions and fees—intercompany
(19
)
 
33

 
(14
)
 

 

Principal transactions
(1,498
)
 
3,857

 
3,535

 

 
5,894

Principal transactions—intercompany
1,018

 
(1,513
)
 
495

 

 

Other income
(3,197
)
 
178

 
8,214

 

 
5,195

Other income—intercompany
3,495

 
250

 
(3,745
)
 

 

Total non-interest revenues
$
(201
)
 
$
5,946

 
$
13,176

 
$

 
$
18,921

Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
8,333

 
$
7,568

 
$
46,662

 
$
(9,700
)
 
$
52,863

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$

 
$

 
$
5,190

 
$

 
$
5,190

Operating expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Compensation and benefits
$
18

 
$
3,641

 
$
12,329

 
$

 
$
15,988

Compensation and benefits—intercompany
34

 

 
(34
)
 

 

Other operating
377

 
1,242

 
13,689

 

 
15,308

Other operating—intercompany
213

 
1,008

 
(1,221
)
 

 

Total operating expenses
$
642

 
$
5,891

 
$
24,763

 
$

 
$
31,296

Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
$
7,691

 
$
1,677

 
$
16,709

 
$
(9,700
)
 
$
16,377

Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(875
)
 
539

 
5,271

 

 
4,935

Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
2,773

 

 

 
(2,773
)
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
11,339

 
$
1,138

 
$
11,438

 
$
(12,473
)
 
$
11,442

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 
(55
)
 

 
(55
)
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
11,339

 
$
1,138

 
$
11,383

 
$
(12,473
)
 
$
11,387

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 
(10
)
 
58

 

 
48

Net income (loss) after attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
11,339

 
$
1,148

 
$
11,325

 
$
(12,473
)
 
$
11,339

Comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss)
$
2,166

 
$
(28
)
 
$
2,589

 
$
(2,561
)
 
$
2,166

Comprehensive income
$
13,505

 
$
1,120

 
$
13,914

 
$
(15,034
)
 
$
13,505


203



Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2015
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
 
CGMHI
 
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
 
Consolidating adjustments
 
Citigroup consolidated
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends from subsidiaries
$
8,200

 
$

 
$

 
$
(8,200
)
 
$

Interest revenue
7

 
3,363

 
40,817

 

 
44,187

Interest revenue—intercompany
2,122

 
180

 
(2,302
)
 

 

Interest expense
3,430

 
741

 
4,849

 

 
9,020

Interest expense—intercompany
(411
)
 
935

 
(524
)
 

 

Net interest revenue
$
(890
)
 
$
1,867

 
$
34,190

 
$

 
$
35,167

Commissions and fees
$

 
$
3,707

 
$
5,389

 
$

 
$
9,096

Commissions and fees—intercompany

 
132

 
(132
)
 

 

Principal transactions
1,192

 
6,896

 
(2,617
)
 

 
5,471

Principal transactions—intercompany
(1,443
)
 
(5,252
)
 
6,695

 

 

Other income
2,463

 
326

 
5,375

 

 
8,164

Other income—intercompany
(1,602
)
 
1,004

 
598

 

 

Total non-interest revenues
$
610

 
$
6,813

 
$
15,308

 
$

 
$
22,731

Total revenues, net of interest expense
$
7,920

 
$
8,680

 
$
49,498

 
$
(8,200
)
 
$
57,898

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims
$

 
$

 
$
5,399

 
$

 
$
5,399

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

Compensation and benefits
$
(22
)
 
$
3,764

 
$
12,582

 
$

 
$
16,324

Compensation and benefits—intercompany
54

 

 
(54
)
 

 

Other operating
30

 
1,462

 
14,665

 

 
16,157

Other operating—intercompany
166

 
903

 
(1,069
)
 

 

Total operating expenses
$
228

 
$
6,129

 
$
26,124

 
$

 
$
32,481

Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
$
7,692

 
$
2,551

 
$
17,975

 
$
(8,200
)
 
$
20,018

Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(786
)
 
562

 
6,261

 

 
6,037

Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries
5,429

 

 

 
(5,429
)
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations
$
13,907

 
$
1,989

 
$
11,714

 
$
(13,629
)
 
$
13,981

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 
(9
)
 

 
(9
)
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
13,907

 
$
1,989

 
$
11,705

 
$
(13,629
)
 
$
13,972

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 
6

 
59

 

 
65

Net income (loss) after attribution of noncontrolling interests
$
13,907

 
$
1,983

 
$
11,646

 
$
(13,629
)
 
$
13,907

Comprehensive income


 


 


 


 


Other comprehensive income (loss)
$
(4,041
)
 
$
(74
)
 
$
(2,285
)
 
$
2,359

 
$
(4,041
)
Comprehensive income
$
9,866

 
$
1,909

 
$
9,361

 
$
(11,270
)
 
$
9,866




204



Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 
September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
 
CGMHI
 
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
 
Consolidating adjustments
 
Citigroup consolidated
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
$

 
$
593

 
$
22,826

 
$

 
$
23,419

Cash and due from banks—intercompany
131

 
2,241

 
(2,372
)
 

 

Federal funds sold and resale agreements

 
197,446

 
38,599

 

 
236,045

Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany

 
8,164

 
(8,164
)
 

 

Trading account assets
(97
)
 
141,187

 
122,262

 

 
263,352

Trading account assets—intercompany
656

 
1,148

 
(1,804
)
 

 

Investments
193

 
353

 
354,394

 

 
354,940

Loans, net of unearned income

 
749

 
637,686

 

 
638,435

Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

 
(12,439
)
 

 
(12,439
)
Total loans, net
$

 
$
749

 
$
625,247

 
$

 
$
625,996

Advances to subsidiaries
$
115,107

 
$

 
$
(115,107
)
 
$

 
$

Investments in subsidiaries
232,108

 

 

 
(232,108
)
 

Other assets (1)
24,243

 
40,433

 
249,689

 

 
314,365

Other assets—intercompany
55,500

 
32,526

 
(88,026
)
 

 

Total assets
$
427,841

 
$
424,840

 
$
1,197,544

 
$
(232,108
)
 
$
1,818,117

Liabilities and equity


 

 

 

 

Deposits
$

 
$

 
$
940,252

 
$

 
$
940,252

Deposits—intercompany

 

 

 

 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold

 
133,214

 
19,910

 

 
153,124

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany

 
23,538

 
(23,538
)
 

 

Trading account liabilities

 
84,252

 
47,397

 

 
131,649

Trading account liabilities—intercompany
563

 
1,303

 
(1,866
)
 

 

Short-term borrowings
1

 
1,439

 
28,087

 

 
29,527

Short-term borrowings—intercompany

 
34,190

 
(34,190
)
 

 

Long-term debt
149,042

 
6,993

 
53,016

 

 
209,051

Long-term debt—intercompany

 
38,573

 
(38,573
)
 

 

Advances from subsidiaries
34,135

 

 
(34,135
)
 

 

Other liabilities
3,547

 
68,047

 
50,230

 

 
121,824

Other liabilities—intercompany
8,978

 
704

 
(9,682
)
 

 

Stockholders’ equity
231,575

 
32,587

 
200,636

 
(232,108
)
 
232,690

Total liabilities and equity
$
427,841

 
$
424,840

 
$
1,197,544

 
$
(232,108
)
 
$
1,818,117


(1)
Other assets for Citigroup parent company at September 30, 2016 included $18.2 billion of placements to Citibank and its branches, of which $8.3 billion had a remaining term of less than 30 days.




205



Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
 
December 31, 2015
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
 
CGMHI
 
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
 
Consolidating adjustments
 
Citigroup consolidated
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and due from banks
$

 
$
592

 
$
20,308

 
$

 
$
20,900

Cash and due from banks—intercompany
124

 
1,403

 
(1,527
)
 

 

Federal funds sold and resale agreements

 
178,178

 
41,497

 

 
219,675

Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany

 
15,035

 
(15,035
)
 

 

Trading account assets
(8
)
 
124,731

 
125,233

 

 
249,956

Trading account assets—intercompany
1,032

 
1,765

 
(2,797
)
 

 

Investments
484

 
402

 
342,069

 

 
342,955

Loans, net of unearned income

 
1,068

 
616,549

 

 
617,617

Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses

 
(3
)
 
(12,623
)
 

 
(12,626
)
Total loans, net
$

 
$
1,065

 
$
603,926

 
$

 
$
604,991

Advances to subsidiaries
$
104,405

 
$

 
$
(104,405
)
 
$

 
$

Investments in subsidiaries
221,362

 

 

 
(221,362
)
 

Other assets(1)
25,819

 
36,860

 
230,054

 

 
292,733

Other assets—intercompany
58,207

 
30,737

 
(88,944
)
 

 

Total assets
$
411,425

 
$
390,768

 
$
1,150,379

 
$
(221,362
)
 
$
1,731,210

Liabilities and equity

 

 

 

 


Deposits
$

 
$

 
$
907,887

 
$

 
$
907,887

Deposits—intercompany

 

 

 

 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold

 
122,459

 
24,037

 

 
146,496

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany
185

 
22,042

 
(22,227
)
 

 

Trading account liabilities

 
62,386

 
55,126

 

 
117,512

Trading account liabilities—intercompany
1,036

 
2,045

 
(3,081
)
 

 

Short-term borrowings
146

 
188

 
20,745

 

 
21,079

Short-term borrowings—intercompany

 
34,916

 
(34,916
)
 

 

Long-term debt
141,914

 
2,530

 
56,831

 

 
201,275

Long-term debt—intercompany

 
51,171

 
(51,171
)
 

 

Advances from subsidiaries
36,453

 

 
(36,453
)
 

 

Other liabilities
3,560

 
55,482

 
54,827

 

 
113,869

Other liabilities—intercompany
6,274

 
10,967

 
(17,241
)
 

 

Stockholders’ equity
221,857

 
26,582

 
196,015

 
(221,362
)
 
223,092

Total liabilities and equity
$
411,425

 
$
390,768

 
$
1,150,379

 
$
(221,362
)
 
$
1,731,210


(1)
Other assets for Citigroup parent company at December 31, 2015 included $21.8 billion of placements to Citibank and its branches, of which $13.9 billion had a remaining term of less than 30 days.



206



Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2016
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
 
CGMHI
 
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
 
Consolidating adjustments
 
Citigroup consolidated
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations
$
16,685

 
$
5,285

 
$
6,364

 
$

 
$
28,334

Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases of investments
$

 
$

 
$
(155,804
)
 
$

 
$
(155,804
)
Proceeds from sales of investments
229

 

 
98,943

 

 
99,172

Proceeds from maturities of investments
61

 

 
52,546

 

 
52,607

Change in deposits with banks

 
(1,464
)
 
(18,910
)
 

 
(20,374
)
Change in loans

 

 
(42,163
)
 

 
(42,163
)
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

 

 
12,676

 

 
12,676

Proceeds from significant disposals

 

 
265

 

 
265

Change in federal funds sold and resales

 
(12,398
)
 
(3,972
)
 

 
(16,370
)
Changes in investments and advances—intercompany
(14,378
)
 
(23
)
 
14,401

 

 

Other investing activities
2,962

 

 
(4,587
)
 

 
(1,625
)
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations
$
(11,126
)
 
$
(13,885
)
 
$
(46,605
)
 
$

 
$
(71,616
)
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends paid
$
(1,517
)
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(1,517
)
Issuance of preferred stock
2,498

 

 

 

 
2,498

Treasury stock acquired
(5,167
)
 

 

 

 
(5,167
)
Proceeds (repayments) from issuance of long-term debt, net
1,613

 
4,196

 
(2,806
)
 

 
3,003

Proceeds (repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—intercompany, net

 
(12,533
)
 
12,533

 

 

Change in deposits

 

 
32,365

 

 
32,365

Change in federal funds purchased and repos

 
12,251

 
(5,623
)
 

 
6,628

Change in short-term borrowings
(163
)
 
1,251

 
7,360

 

 
8,448

Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany
(2,503
)
 
(726
)
 
3,229

 

 

Capital contributions from parent

 
5,000

 
(5,000
)
 

 

Other financing activities
(313
)
 

 

 

 
(313
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations
$
(5,552
)
 
$
9,439

 
$
42,058

 
$

 
$
45,945

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks
$

 
$

 
$
(144
)
 
$

 
$
(144
)
Change in cash and due from banks
$
7

 
$
839

 
$
1,673

 
$

 
$
2,519

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period
124

 
1,995

 
18,781

 

 
20,900

Cash and due from banks at end of period
$
131

 
$
2,834

 
$
20,454

 
$

 
$
23,419

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations


 


 


 


 


Cash paid (refund) during the year for income taxes
$
(265
)
 
$
81

 
$
3,039

 
$

 
$
2,855

Cash paid during the year for interest
3,402

 
2,378

 
3,980

 

 
9,760

Non-cash investing activities


 


 


 


 


Transfers to loans HFS from loans

 

 
7,900

 

 
7,900

Transfers to OREO and other repossessed assets

 

 
138

 

 
138


207



Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2015
In millions of dollars
Citigroup parent company
 
CGMHI
 
Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations
 
Consolidating adjustments
 
Citigroup consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations
$
14,915

 
$
(1,849
)
 
$
28,298

 
$

 
$
41,364

Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases of investments
$

 
$
(4
)
 
$
(195,417
)
 
$

 
$
(195,421
)
Proceeds from sales of investments

 
53

 
113,900

 

 
113,953

Proceeds from maturities of investments
210

 

 
64,640

 

 
64,850

Change in deposits with banks

 
(10,267
)
 
17

 

 
(10,250
)
Change in loans

 

 
(7,158
)
 

 
(7,158
)
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

 

 
8,127

 

 
8,127

Change in federal funds sold and resales

 
4,628

 
6,247

 

 
10,875

Changes in investments and advances—intercompany
(22,517
)
 
2,207

 
20,310

 

 

Other investing activities
1

 
(63
)
 
(1,939
)
 

 
(2,001
)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations
$
(22,306
)
 
$
(3,446
)
 
$
8,727

 
$

 
$
(17,025
)
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends paid
$
(838
)
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(838
)
Issuance of preferred stock
4,731

 

 

 

 
4,731

Treasury stock acquired
(3,800
)
 

 

 

 
(3,800
)
Proceeds (repayments) from issuance of long-term debt, net
8,683

 
(98
)
 
(6,544
)
 

 
2,041

Proceeds (repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—intercompany, net

 
12,514

 
(12,514
)
 

 

Change in deposits

 

 
4,911

 

 
4,911

Change in federal funds purchased and repos

 
(5,956
)
 
1,122

 

 
(4,834
)
Change in short-term borrowings
(529
)
 
(1,752
)
 
(33,475
)
 

 
(35,756
)
Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany
(434
)
 
335

 
99

 

 

Other financing activities
(425
)
 

 

 

 
(425
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations
$
7,388

 
$
5,043

 
$
(46,401
)
 
$

 
$
(33,970
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks
$

 
$

 
$
(751
)
 
$

 
$
(751
)
Change in cash and due from banks
$
(3
)
 
$
(252
)
 
$
(10,127
)
 
$

 
$
(10,382
)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period
125

 
1,751

 
30,232

 

 
32,108

Cash and due from banks at end of period
$
122

 
$
1,499

 
$
20,105

 
$

 
$
21,726

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations


 


 


 


 


Cash paid (refund) during the year for income taxes
$
88

 
$
157

 
$
3,798

 
$

 
$
4,043

Cash paid during the year for interest
3,759

 
1,704

 
2,978

 

 
8,441

Non-cash investing activities


 


 


 


 


Decrease in net loans associated with significant disposals reclassified to HFS
$

 
$

 
$
(9,063
)
 
$

 
$
(9,063
)
Decrease in investments associated with significant disposals reclassified to HFS

 

 
(1,402
)
 

 
(1,402
)
Decrease in goodwill and intangible assets associated with significant disposals reclassified to HFS

 

 
(216
)
 

 
(216
)
Decrease in deposits with banks associated with significant disposals reclassified to HFS

 

 
(404
)
 

 
(404
)
Transfers to loans HFS from loans

 

 
17,900

 

 
17,900

Transfers to OREO and other repossessed assets

 

 
225

 

 
225

Non-cash financing activities


 


 


 


 


Decrease in long-term debt associated with significant disposals reclassified to HFS

$

 
$

 
$
(6,179
)
 
$

 
$
(6,179
)

208



UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES, PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES, DIVIDENDS

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
None.

Equity Security Repurchases
The following table summarizes Citi’s equity security repurchases, which consisted entirely of common stock repurchases:

In millions, except per share amounts
Total shares
purchased
Average
price paid
per share
Approximate dollar
value of shares that
may yet be purchased
under the plan or
programs
July 2016
 
 
 
Open market repurchases(1)
16.2

$
43.02

$
7,937

Employee transactions(2)


N/A

August 2016
 
 
 
Open market repurchases(1)
15.2

45.73

7,244

Employee transactions(2)


N/A

September 2016
 
 
 
Open market repurchases(1)
24.3

46.96

6,103

Employee transactions(2)


N/A

Total
55.7

$
45.48

$
6,103

(1)
Represents repurchases under the $8.6 billion 2016 common stock repurchase program (2016 Repurchase Program) that was approved by Citigroup’s Board of Directors and announced on June 29, 2016, which was part of the planned capital actions included by Citi in its 2016 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). Shares repurchased under the 2016 Repurchase Program were added to treasury stock.
(2)
Consisted of shares added to treasury stock related to (i) certain activity on employee stock option program exercises where the employee delivers existing shares to cover the option exercise, or (ii) under Citi’s employee restricted stock programs where shares are withheld to satisfy tax requirements.
N/A Not applicable

Dividends
In addition to Board of Directors’ approval, Citi’s ability to pay common stock dividends substantially depends on regulatory approval, including an annual regulatory review of the results of the CCAR process required by the Federal Reserve Board and the supervisory stress tests required under the Dodd-Frank Act. For additional information regarding Citi’s capital planning and stress testing, see “Capital Resources—Current Regulatory Capital Standards—Capital Planning and Stress Testing” and “Risk Factors—Regulatory Risks” in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any dividend on Citi’s outstanding common stock would also need to be made in compliance with Citi’s obligations to its outstanding preferred stock.
For information on the ability of Citigroup’s subsidiary depository institutions to pay dividends, see Note 19 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Citi’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.



209



SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 31st day of October, 2016.



CITIGROUP INC.
(Registrant)





By    /s/ John C. Gerspach
John C. Gerspach
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)



By    /s/ Jeffrey R. Walsh
Jeffrey R. Walsh
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)




210



EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit
 
 
Number
 
Description of Exhibit
3.01
 
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as in effect on the date hereof, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 (File No. 1-9924).
 
 
 
12.01+
 
Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges.
 
 
 
12.02+
 
Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges Including Preferred Stock Dividends.
 
 
 
31.01+
 
Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
31.02+
 
Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
32.01+
 
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
 
101.01+
 
Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, filed on October 31, 2016, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statement of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheet, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 

The total amount of securities authorized pursuant to any instrument defining rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company will furnish copies of any such instrument to the SEC upon request.
 
+ Filed herewith.    




211