e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: March 31, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 0-25092
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
86-0766246 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
1305 West Auto Drive, Tempe, Arizona 85284
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(480) 902-1001
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the issuers common stock as of June 29, 2007 of 49,100,749.
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
EXPLANATORY NOTE REGARDING RESTATEMENT OF OUR
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we have restated our consolidated statements of
earnings and of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Based on information provided by an independent committee of the Board of Directors (the
Options Subcommittee) resulting from its review of the Companys historical stock option granting
practices, we identified errors in the Companys accounting related to stock option compensation
expenses in prior periods. The Options Subcommittees review encompassed all options on Company
securities granted to directors, officers, or employees from the Companys initial public offering
in January 1995 through November 30, 2005 (the Relevant Period). During this period, the Company
made more than 28,000 individual option grants, involving options on more than 28 million
(split-adjusted) shares, on 957 separate grant dates. Additionally, the Company undertook an
analysis of the results of the Options Subcommittees review as well as all stock option activity
during the Relevant Period. We determined that corrections to our consolidated financial
statements were required to reflect additional material charges for stock-based compensation
expenses and related income tax effects.
Our consolidated retained earnings as of December 31, 2005 incorporates an aggregate of
approximately $30.9 million in incremental stock option-related compensation charges relating to
the period from January 24, 1995 through December 31, 2005. This charge is net of a $16.5 million
tax benefit related to the restatement adjustments. This additional compensation expense results
from our determination, based upon the Options Subcommittees review and the Companys analysis,
that for accounting purposes, the dates initially used to measure compensation expense for many
stock option grants to employees, executive officers and outside non-employee directors during the
period could not be relied upon. In particular, the Options Subcommittee identified various
categories of grants that had been made by the Company during the period under review including:
(a) discretionary grants of various types; (b) anniversary grants; (c) promotion grants; (d) new
hire grants; and (e) program grants. In general, the Options Subcommittee found: (x) a lack of
significant issues with respect to new hire grants; (y) that during a portion of the period under
review, the Company retrospectively selected dates for anniversary grants and promotion grants
based on the lowest price in a particular period; and (z) inadequate documentation surrounding
certain discretionary grants, including grants to officers that required approval by the
Compensation Committee. We determined that the revised measurement dates for accounting purposes
differed from the originally selected measurement dates due primarily to: (i) insufficient or
incomplete approvals; (ii) inadequate or incomplete establishment of the terms of the grants,
including the list of individual recipients; and (iii) the use of hindsight to select exercise
prices.
In those cases in which the Company had previously used a measurement date that we determined
could no longer be relied upon, we undertook to identify the most supportable measurement date from
the available evidence. For the grant dates specifically reviewed by the Options Subcommittee,
management analyzed the documents identified during the review performed by the Options
Subcommittee, the information contained in the Companys stock plan administration database
application (Equity Edge), minute books, personnel files, payroll records, Securities and
Exchange Commissions (SEC) filings, electronic files on the Companys computer network and human
resources systems to determine the appropriate measurement dates. We considered the information
available for each recipient included in each of the grant dates to determine the most supportable
measurement date for each individual grant within the grant date. For the remaining grants not specifically reviewed by the Options Subcommittee, management reviewed each grant date
and all available support contained in the Stock Plan Administration hard copy files, human
resources system data and Equity Edge information for each recipient included in each of the
individual grant dates to determine the type of grant and most supportable measurement date for
each individual grant within the grant date. The Company used the information contained in Equity
Edge to categorize the grants, if possible, into the various categories discussed above.
Individual grants categorized in Equity Edge as new hire or anniversary grants were separately
accumulated and analyzed. For more information on our restatement, see Managements Discussion
and
3
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 2 and Note 2 of our Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report.
In addition to the restatements for stock-based compensation, we recorded a pre-tax adjustment
for $1.0 million to record a legal settlement expense that was recorded in the first quarter of
2006, which should have been recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. The tax effect of this
adjustment was $0.4 million.
All financial information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q gives effect to the
restatements of our consolidated financial statements as described above. We have not amended, and
we do not intend to amend, our previously filed Annual Reports on Form 10-K or Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q for each of the fiscal years and fiscal quarters of 1995 through 2005, and for the first
six months of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. Financial information included in reports
previously filed or furnished by Insight Enterprises, Inc. for the periods from January 1, 1995
through June 30, 2006 should not be relied upon and were superseded by the information in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2006.
Management had determined that we had a material weakness in our internal control over
financial reporting relating to the implementation and administration of our equity compensation
programs and the accounting for awards thereunder as of December 31, 2006. As described in more
detail in Item 4 of this Quarterly Report, although the Company made its last stock option grant on
November 30, 2005, based on the findings of the Options Subcommittee, the problems uncovered during
the review have caused the Company to undertake remedial measures to ensure that similar problems
cannot occur in connection with its grants of restricted stock. We have identified and are
implementing measures designed to remedy this material weakness.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including statements in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part I,
Item 2 of this report, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may include: projections of
matters that affect net sales, gross profit, operating expenses, earnings from continuing
operations, non-operating income and expenses or net earnings; effects of acquisitions; projections
of capital expenditures and growth; hiring plans; plans for future operations; the availability of
financing and our needs or plans relating thereto; plans relating to our products and services; the
effect of new accounting principles or changes in accounting policies; the effect of guaranty and
indemnification obligations; statements of belief; and statements of assumptions underlying any of
the foregoing. Forward-looking statements are identified by such words as believe, anticipate,
expect, estimate, intend, plan, project, will, may and variations of such words and
similar expressions, and are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be
predicted or quantified. Future events and actual results could differ materially from those set
forth in, contemplated by, or underlying the forward-looking statements. Some of the important
factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in any
forward-looking statements, include but are not limited to, the following, which are discussed in
Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006:
|
|
|
changes in the information technology industry and/or the economic environment; |
|
|
|
|
our reliance on suppliers for product availability, marketing funds, purchasing
incentives and competitive products to sell; |
|
|
|
|
disruptions in our information technology and voice and data networks, including
migration of Software Spectrum to our information technology and voice and data networks; |
|
|
|
|
the integration and operation of Software Spectrum, including our ability to achieve the
expected benefits of the acquisition; |
|
|
|
|
actions of our competitors, including manufacturers of products we sell; |
|
|
|
|
the informal inquiry from the SEC and the fact that we could be subject to stockholder
litigation related to the investigation by the Options Subcommittee of our Board of
Directors into our historical stock option granting practices and the related restatement
of our consolidated financial statements; |
4
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
|
|
the recently enacted changes in securities laws and regulations, including potential
risk resulting from our evaluation of internal controls under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002; |
|
|
|
|
the risks associated with international operations; |
|
|
|
|
sales of software licenses are subject to seasonal changes in demand; |
|
|
|
|
increased debt and interest expense and lower availability on our financing facilities; |
|
|
|
|
increased exposure to currency exchange risks; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
risk that purchased goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired; |
|
|
|
|
our failure to comply with the terms and conditions of our public sector contracts; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with our very limited experience in outsourcing business functions to India; |
|
|
|
|
rapid changes in product standards; and |
|
|
|
|
intellectual property infringement claims. |
Additionally, there may be other risks that are otherwise described from time to time in the
reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
In addition, these forward-looking statements include statements regarding the informal
inquiry commenced by the SEC and a stockholders demand to inspect our books and records pursuant
to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. There can be no assurances that
forward-looking statements will be achieved, and actual results could differ materially from those
suggested by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially include: adjustments to the consolidated financial statements that may be
required related to the SEC informal inquiry; and risks of litigation and governmental or other
regulatory inquiry or proceedings arising out of or related to the Companys historical stock
option granting practices. Therefore, any forward-looking statements in this release should be
considered in light of various important factors, including the risks and uncertainties listed
above, as well as others.
We assume no obligation to update, and do not intend to update, any forward-looking
statements. We do not endorse any projections regarding future performance that may be made by
third parties.
5
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
32,160 |
|
|
$ |
54,697 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful
accounts of $23,287 and $23,211, respectively |
|
|
798,779 |
|
|
|
994,892 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
96,439 |
|
|
|
97,751 |
|
Inventories not available for sale |
|
|
28,132 |
|
|
|
31,112 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
15,908 |
|
|
|
15,583 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
30,261 |
|
|
|
32,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,001,679 |
|
|
|
1,226,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $91,757
and $89,968, respectively |
|
|
132,830 |
|
|
|
129,256 |
|
Buildings held for lease, net of accumulated depreciation of $4,739
and $4,543, respectively |
|
|
16,326 |
|
|
|
16,522 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
297,906 |
|
|
|
296,781 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $7,022 and
$3,796, respectively |
|
|
84,354 |
|
|
|
86,929 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
19,079 |
|
|
|
18,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,554,963 |
|
|
$ |
1,774,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
456,249 |
|
|
$ |
611,367 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
108,503 |
|
|
|
136,401 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
27,688 |
|
|
|
40,728 |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
615,440 |
|
|
|
818,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
178,500 |
|
|
|
224,250 |
|
Long-term deferred income taxes |
|
|
20,448 |
|
|
|
19,403 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
21,913 |
|
|
|
21,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 3,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000 shares authorized;
49,096 shares at March 31, 2007 and 48,868 shares at
December 31, 2006 issued and outstanding |
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
367,914 |
|
|
|
363,308 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
314,932 |
|
|
|
297,664 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
35,325 |
|
|
|
28,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
718,662 |
|
|
|
690,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,554,963 |
|
|
$ |
1,774,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,123,975 |
|
|
$ |
732,824 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
970,800 |
|
|
|
635,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
153,175 |
|
|
|
97,106 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
129,758 |
|
|
|
76,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
23,417 |
|
|
|
21,001 |
|
Non-operating (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(2,112 |
) |
|
|
(922 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
5,759 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
Net foreign currency exchange (gain) loss |
|
|
(654 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income
taxes |
|
|
20,207 |
|
|
|
20,933 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
7,911 |
|
|
|
7,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
12,296 |
|
|
|
13,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of taxes of
$111 and $865, respectively |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operation, net of taxes of
$3,135 in 2007 |
|
|
4,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
4,972 |
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
17,268 |
|
|
$ |
14,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
49,010 |
|
|
|
48,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
49,291 |
|
|
|
48,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
12,296 |
|
|
$ |
13,442 |
|
Plus: net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
4,972 |
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
17,268 |
|
|
|
14,824 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8,913 |
|
|
|
4,605 |
|
Provision for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
Write-downs of inventories |
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
2,041 |
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation |
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
3,172 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operation |
|
|
(7,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from employee gains on stock-based compensation |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(2,662 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(2,676 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accounts receivable |
|
|
182,155 |
|
|
|
62,973 |
|
(Increase) decrease in inventories |
|
|
(3,989 |
) |
|
|
35,765 |
|
Decrease (increase) in other current assets |
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
(835 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(5,993 |
) |
|
|
258 |
|
Decrease in accounts payable |
|
|
(117,725 |
) |
|
|
(6,934 |
) |
Decrease in inventories financing facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,281 |
) |
Decrease in deferred revenue |
|
|
(12,768 |
) |
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(24,991 |
) |
|
|
4,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
39,379 |
|
|
|
113,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operation |
|
|
28,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(8,376 |
) |
|
|
(9,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
20,318 |
|
|
|
(9,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on short-term financing facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,000 |
) |
Borrowings on long-term financing facility |
|
|
121,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on long-term financing facility |
|
|
(163,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in book overdrafts |
|
|
(31,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayments on term loan |
|
|
(3,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net repayments on line of credit |
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
|
(21,309 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of common stock under employee stock plans |
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
6,840 |
|
Excess tax benefit from employee gains on stock-based compensation |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
2,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(81,802 |
) |
|
|
(56,807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(322 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,070 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange effect on cash flow |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(22,537 |
) |
|
|
47,692 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
54,697 |
|
|
|
35,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
32,160 |
|
|
$ |
82,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
8
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
We are a leading provider of brand-name information technology (IT) hardware, software and
services to large enterprises, small- to medium-sized businesses and public sector institutions in
North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific. We operate in three reportable
geographic operating segments: North America; EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa); and APAC
(Asia-Pacific). Currently, our offerings in North America and the United Kingdom include
brand-name IT hardware, software and services. Our offerings in the remainder of our EMEA segment
and in APAC currently only include software and select software-related services.
On March 1, 2007, we completed the sale of PC Wholesale, a division of our North America
operating segment. The transaction generated net cash proceeds of $28.7 million for net assets
sold, which are subject to certain post-closing adjustments. Accordingly, PC Wholesales results
of operations for all periods presented are classified as a discontinued operation. See further
information in Note 11.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary
to present fairly our financial position as of March 31, 2007 and our results of operations and
cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. The consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2006 was derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet at such date. The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes have been prepared in accordance
with the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC and consequently do not include all of the
disclosures normally required by United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results
for the full year, due in part to the seasonal nature of the business. These unaudited
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated
financial statements, including the related notes thereto, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2006.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements. Additionally, these estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of
sales and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Insight Enterprises, Inc. and
its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. References to the Company, we, us, our and other similar
words refer to Insight Enterprises, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context
suggests otherwise.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), which provides
guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The standard also responds to
investors requests for more information about (1) the extent to which companies measure assets and
liabilities at fair value, (2) the information used to measure fair value, and (3) the effect that
fair-value measurements have on earnings. SFAS No. 157 will apply whenever another standard
requires (or permits) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not
expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. We are in the process of determining the effect that the adoption of SFAS No.
157 will have on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
9
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxesan interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), which clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 applies to all entities subject to income
taxes and covers all tax positions accounted for in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation requires that we recognize the effect of a tax
position in our consolidated financial statements if there is a greater likelihood than not of the
position being sustained upon audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions
of FIN 48 are effective January 1, 2007, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting
principle recorded as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings. We did not record an
adjustment to beginning retained earnings as a result of the implementation of FIN 48. See further
discussion regarding our implementation of FIN 48 in Note 6.
On
May 2, 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FIN
48-1, Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation
No. 48,
or FSP FIN 48-1, which amends FIN 48, to provide guidance about
how an enterprise should determine whether a tax position is
effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously
unrecognized tax benefits. Under FSP FIN 48-1, a tax position is
considered to be effectively settled if the taxing authority
completed its examination, the company does not plan to appeal, and
it is remote that the taxing authority would rexamine the tax
position in the future.
2. Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements
Background
We announced on October 19, 2006 that the Companys Board of Directors had appointed an
Options Subcommittee, comprised of independent directors, to conduct a review of the Companys
stock options. Certain present and former directors and executive officers of the Company were
named as defendants in a derivative lawsuit related to stock option practices from 1997 to 2002,
filed in Superior Court, County of Maricopa, Arizona on September 21, 2006. The Company had been
named as a nominal defendant in that action. On December 22, 2006, we filed a motion to dismiss
the complaint based on plaintiffs failure to make a pre-suit demand on the Companys Board of
Directors. Before the opposition to the motion was due, the plaintiff voluntarily asked the Court
to dismiss the lawsuit, and, on January 19, 2007, the Court granted the plaintiffs motion to
voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice. In addition, we announced on November 6, 2006
that on October 27, 2006, the Company received an informal inquiry from the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC) requesting certain documents and information relating to the Companys stock
option granting practices from January 1, 1996 to the present.
The Options Subcommittee was assisted by independent legal counsel and independent forensic
accounting consultants. At the conclusion of its review, the Options Subcommittee reported its
findings to the Companys Board of Directors and to KPMG LLP, the Companys independent registered
public accounting firm, on March 9, 2007 and March 13, 2007, respectively. Management, assisted by
its own independent legal counsel and independent forensic consultants, then undertook an analysis
of the results of the Options Subcommittees review, as well as all stock option activity during
the period after the Companys initial public offering on January 24, 1995 through November 30,
2005, the last date on which we granted stock options (the Relevant Period).
Based upon the investigation and determinations made by the Options Subcommittee of the Board
of Directors and managements undertaking of a review of historical stock option activity, the
Company identified errors in its accounting related to stock option compensation expense for each
of the fiscal years ended 1995 through 2005 and for the first quarter of the year ended December
31, 2006. In a Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2007, we reported that based on the findings of the
Options Subcommittee and the conclusions reached to date by management in its analysis, our
previously issued financial statements would require restatement and should no longer be relied
upon.
We determined, based upon the Options Subcommittees review and the Companys analysis, that
for accounting purposes, the dates initially used to measure compensation expense for various stock
option grants to employees, executive officers and outside non-employee directors during the period
could not be relied upon. The revised measurement dates identified for accounting purposes
differed from the originally selected measurement dates due primarily to: (i) insufficient or
incomplete approvals; (ii) inadequate or incomplete establishment of the terms of the grants,
including the list of individual recipients; and (iii) the use of hindsight to select exercise
prices. These restated consolidated financial statements reflect the corrections resulting from
our determination.
10
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
Restatement Adjustments
Our restated consolidated financial statements contained in this Form 10-Q incorporate
stock-based compensation expense, including the income tax impacts related to the restatement
adjustments. The restatement adjustments result in a $30.9 million reduction of retained earnings
as of December 31, 2005. The total restatement impact for the years ended December 31, 1995 through
December 31, 2005, of $30.9 million, net of related tax benefits of $16.5 million, has been
reflected as a prior period adjustment to beginning retained earnings as of January 1, 2006.
In addition to the restatements for stock-based compensation, we recorded a pre-tax adjustment
for $1.0 million to record a legal settlement expense that was recorded in the first quarter of
2006, which should have been recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. The tax effect of this
adjustment was $0.4 million.
The following table summarizes the effect of the restatement adjustments on beginning retained
earnings as of January 1, 2006, ending retained earnings as of March 31, 2006, and net earnings for
the three months ended March 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
January 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously reported |
|
$ |
14,214 |
|
|
$ |
266,533 |
|
|
$ |
252,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,399 |
) |
|
|
(47,399 |
) |
Other miscellaneous accounting
adjustments |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
16,537 |
|
|
|
16,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
(30,862 |
) |
|
|
(31,472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As restated |
|
$ |
14,824 |
|
|
$ |
235,671 |
|
|
$ |
220,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
The tables below present the decrease (increase) in net earnings resulting from the
individual restatement adjustments for each respective period presented and are explained in
further detail following the table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2000 |
|
Stock option compensation from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary Grants |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
3,510 |
|
|
$ |
11,716 |
|
|
$ |
4,190 |
|
|
$ |
5,830 |
|
Anniversary Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
Promotion Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
New Hire Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Program Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock compensation expense
from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other miscellaneous accounting
adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to record legal
settlement in appropriate period |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other miscellaneous
accounting adjustments |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
4,331 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations |
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
|
8,486 |
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
4,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock option compensation
expense from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
4,834 |
|
|
|
2,951 |
|
|
|
2,344 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to net earnings
from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
3,182 |
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to net earnings
before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
2,629 |
|
|
|
11,668 |
|
|
|
6,032 |
|
|
|
6,378 |
|
Total adjustments to cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total decrease (increase) in net
earnings |
|
$ |
(610 |
) |
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
2,629 |
|
|
$ |
11,668 |
|
|
$ |
6,032 |
|
|
$ |
6,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
1997 |
|
|
1996 |
|
|
1995 |
|
|
Total |
|
Stock option compensation from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary Grants |
|
$ |
1,341 |
|
|
$ |
1,654 |
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
29,026 |
|
Anniversary Grants |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,347 |
|
Promotion Grants |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551 |
|
New Hire Grants |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
Program Grants |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock compensation expense
from continuing operations |
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
35,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other miscellaneous accounting
adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to record legal
settlement in appropriate period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other miscellaneous
accounting adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
35,018 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
22,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock option compensation
expense from discontinued
operations |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12,381 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to net earnings
from discontinued operations |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to net earnings
before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
30,862 |
|
Total adjustments to cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total decrease (increase) in net
earnings |
|
$ |
1,889 |
|
|
$ |
1,596 |
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
30,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Compensation These adjustments are from our determination, based upon the
Options Subcommittees review and the Companys analysis, that for accounting purposes, the dates
initially used to measure compensation expense for numerous option grants to employees, executive
officers and outside non-employee directors during the period could not be relied upon for various
categories of option grants including: (i) discretionary grants of various types; (ii) anniversary
grants; (iii) promotion grants; (iv) new hire grants; and (v) program grants. The revised
measurement dates identified for accounting purposes differed from the originally selected
measurement dates due primarily to: (i) insufficient or incomplete approvals; (ii) inadequate or
incomplete establishment of the terms of the grants, including the list of individual recipients;
and (iii) the use of hindsight to select exercise prices.
Specifically, for each of the categories of option grants discussed in more detail under
Accounting Considerations below, we noted the following:
Stock option grants with insufficient or incomplete approvals. The Company determined that
the original recorded grant date could not be relied on because there was correspondence or other
evidence that indicated that not all required approvals had been obtained, including for certain
grants, Compensation Committee approval.
13
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
The Company remeasured these option grants with a revised measurement date supported by the
required level of approval, as described below, and accounted for these grants as fixed awards
under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB
No. 25).
Inadequate or incomplete establishment of the terms of the grants. The Company determined
that for certain stock option grants, the number of shares and the exercise price were not known
with finality at the original measurement date. The Company determined that the original recorded
grant date could not be relied on because there was correspondence or other evidence that indicated
that the Company had not finalized the number of stock options allocated to each individual
recipient and the related exercise price. Based on available supporting documentation, the Company
determined the date by which the number of stock options to be awarded to each recipient was
finalized and the other terms of the award were established and accounted for these grants as fixed
awards under APB No. 25.
The use of hindsight to select exercise prices. As noted below, the Company followed an
informal policy of awarding options to individual employees in recognition of the anniversary of
their employment with the Company or in conjunction with employee promotions using hindsight to
select the exercise price. In many instances, little or no documentation to support dates selected
for option grants could be located by the Company. Further, instances of favorable, retrospective
date selection of discretionary grants were identified. Also, as noted below, the investigation
noted instances of inadequate documentation, or retrospective date selection, relating to the award
of grants to the Companys top three executive officers, all of which required Compensation
Committee approval. Based on available supporting documentation, the Company determined a revised
measurement date and accounted for these grants as fixed awards under APB No. 25.
Income Tax Benefit The Company recorded a net income tax benefit of approximately $16.5 million
in connection with the stock-based compensation related expense during the period from fiscal year
1995 to December 31, 2005, net of estimated limitations under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m).
This tax benefit resulted in an increase of the Companys deferred tax assets for most U.S.
affected stock options prior to the exercise or forfeiture of the related options. With the
exception of UK employees exercising options after 2002, the Company recorded no tax benefit or
deferred tax asset for affected stock options granted to non-U.S. employees because the Company
determined that it could not receive tax benefits for these options. Further, the Company limited
the deferred tax assets recorded for affected stock options granted to certain highly paid officers
to reflect estimated limitations on tax deductibility under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m).
Upon exercise or forfeiture of the underlying options, the excess or deficiency in deferred tax
assets are written-off to paid-in capital in the period of exercise or forfeiture.
Accounting Considerations Stock-Based Compensation
We originally accounted for all employee, officer and director stock option grants as fixed
grants under APB 25, using a measurement date of the recorded grant date. We issued all grants with
an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the recorded grant date,
and therefore originally recorded no stock-based compensation expense.
As a result of the findings of the Options Subcommittee, and our own further review of our
stock option granting practices, we determined that the measurement dates for certain stock option
grants differed from the recorded grant dates for such grants. Based on the analysis described
below, the Company concluded that it was appropriate to revise the measurement dates for these
grants based upon its findings. The Company calculated stock-based compensation expense under APB
No. 25 based upon the intrinsic value as of the adjusted measurement dates of stock option awards
determined to be fixed under APB No. 25 and the vesting provisions of the underlying options.
The Company calculated the intrinsic value on the adjusted measurement date as the closing price of
its common stock on such date as reported on the NASDAQ National Market, now the NASDAQ Global
Select Market, less the exercise price per share of common stock as stated in the underlying stock
option agreement, multiplied by the number of shares subject to such stock option award. The
Company recognizes these
14
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
amounts as compensation expense over the vesting period of the underlying options in
accordance with the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 28, Accounting for Stock Appreciation
Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans. We also determined that variable accounting
treatment was appropriate under APB No. 25 for certain stock option grants for which evidence was
obtained that the terms of the options may have been communicated to those recipients and that
those terms were subsequently modified (stock option grants cancelled and repriced). When variable
accounting is applied to stock option grants, we remeasure, and report in our consolidated
statements of earnings, the intrinsic value of the options at the end of each reporting period
until the options are exercised, cancelled or expire unexercised.
The Company determined the most supportable measurement dates for each of the various
categories of options grants as follows:
Discretionary Grants. Discretionary grants included grants to the Companys outside
directors, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), President and Chief Financial Officer (the three
highest ranking executives of the Company), other Section 16 Officers, and all other Company
employees.
The Company determined that it had granted stock options to its outside directors pursuant to
the Companys stock plans or Board of Directors minutes in the majority of instances; however, in
a few instances, certain grants to these individuals require alternative measurement dates based on
the approval dates specified in plan documents or signed minutes. The Company recorded a pre-tax
adjustment to compensation expense totaling less than $0.1 million associated with all grants to
outside directors during the Relevant Period.
During the Relevant Period, the Company followed a practice of requiring Compensation
Committee approval of the stock option awards to the three highest ranking executives of the
Company. For some grants, the Compensation Committee minutes do not indicate approval of an award.
In other instances, the Company either did not locate minutes or the evidence was inconclusive
concerning when a specific meeting occurred. The Company determined that certain grants to these
individuals require alternative measurement dates. For example, due to inconclusive evidence
regarding the date of Compensation Committee approval, because the Board had approved the Proxy
Statement in which the award was specifically listed, the Proxy Statement filing date was selected
as the best evidence of a measurement date for the award. The Company recorded a pre-tax
adjustment to compensation expense totaling $13.3 million for all grants to the three highest
ranking executives of the Company during the Relevant Period.
Prior to May 16, 2003, the CEO approved stock option awards to Section 16 Officers. Evidence
of CEO approval typically consisted of an email containing the grant terms. Effective with the May
16, 2003 Compensation Committee meeting, the Compensation Committee was required to approve grants
to the Section 16 Officers. Evidence of Compensation Committee approval included Compensation
Committee minutes or a signed Unanimous Written Consent (UWC). The Company determined that
certain grants to these individuals required alternative measurement dates based on the date of
approval identified in the supporting documentation. The Company recorded a pre-tax adjustment to
compensation expense totaling $9.5 million in connection with discretionary grants to Section 16
Officers, in addition to the $13.3 million pre-tax adjustment for grants to the three highest
ranking executives of the Company, during the Relevant Period.
Throughout most of the Relevant Period, the Companys option plans granted discretion to the
CEO to award option grants to any Company employee, other than the top three executives. The CEO
in turn authorized a defined number of options in connection with certain discretionary grants
during the Relevant Period that were allocated by certain senior executives amongst employees
within particular business units. In certain instances, the review revealed that lists of grantees
within specified business units had not been finalized as of the grant date. Where required, the
Company identified alternative measurement dates for these discretionary grants and recorded the
required pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense totaling $7.9 million during the Relevant
Period.
15
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
During the Relevant Period, the Company also granted annual performance-based options to
employees at the discretion of certain executives and managers within each business unit. Based on
the supporting documentation, the business units finalized the list of awards by person on
different dates. The Company reconciled each list to the actual awards contained in the Companys
stock plan administration database to determine the date by which each business units list was
finalized. The Company recorded a pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense totaling $6.5 million
for six grant dates during the Relevant Period that primarily related to annual performance
reviews.
Anniversary Grants. Throughout the Relevant Period, the Company followed an informal policy
of awarding options to individual employees in recognition of the anniversary of their employment
with the Company or in conjunction with employee promotions. The number of these options was
determined by the employees level within the Company, or, in the case of promotion grants, the
level to which the employee was promoted. The majority of these grants were modest in size,
generally 500 options or less. In the case of senior management, anniversary or promotion grants
could be much larger, at 5,000 or 7,500 options. Occasionally, very senior executives, other than
the top three executives, received larger grants for anniversaries or promotions, but these were
relatively few and were generally done on a case-by-case basis.
The Options Subcommittee review indicated that the Companys anniversary related options were
granted with measurement dates determined by three general methods, depending upon the time period
in the Relevant Period. From the beginning of the Relevant Period through the end of 1998,
anniversary grants were generally granted with a measurement date on an employees actual
anniversary date. For a period of time between 1999 and 2002, the grant dates generally were
selected retrospectively based on either the low price of a month or the low price of the quarter.
In the third quarter of 2002, the Company began a practice of awarding anniversary grants on the
15th day of each month for the balance of 2002, and in January 2003, the Company
essentially ceased making anniversary grants, except for minimal contractual grants to certain
United Kingdom employees which continued into 2005.
The Company used email correspondence or other documentation maintained in the Stock Plan
Administration files and information obtained from the Companys human resources system and payroll
records to determine each employees anniversary date based on the employees hire (and
corresponding anniversary) date. The general granting practice for anniversary awards in place at
the relevant point in time was used to determine the appropriate measurement date for each
employees anniversary award. For a limited number of grants, absent evidence of the
employees hire date, the date the employee record of the stock options was added to the Companys
stock plan administration database application was used as the measurement date for the awards
identified as anniversary grants. For periods where the Company issued anniversary grants using
quarterly or monthly lows, or other low prices, alternate measurement dates were required. The
Company recorded a pre-tax compensation expense adjustment totaling $6.6 million for anniversary
grants during the Relevant Period.
Promotion Grants. Promotion grants were generally handled in the same manner as anniversary
grants. In some instances, promotion grants were awarded on the promotion effective date and other
times at the low price of the month or quarter. The Companys analysis revealed that the Company
had a general practice of granting promotion options on the employees promotion effective dates
from 1998 through 2000. The Company selected either the promotion effective date, if available, or
the date the employee record of the stock options was added to the Companys stock plan
administration database application, if the promotion effective date was not available, as the
measurement date for the promotion grants issued from 1998 through 2000. For subsequent periods
where the Company issued promotion grants using quarterly or monthly lows, or other low prices,
alternate measurement dates were required. The Company recorded a pre-tax compensation expense
adjustment totaling $2.2 million for promotion grants during the Relevant Period.
New Hire Grants. Throughout the Relevant Period, the Company issued an option grant to each
new employee on the employees start date. The Company had a uniform practice of granting a
specific number of options depending on the incoming employees level within the Company. For
example, the lowest level
16
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
employees would receive 50 options on their start date, while certain managers might receive
2,500 options. Senior executive officers would typically receive much larger grants upon joining
the Company, and those grants were typically negotiated as part of a total compensation package
that were reflected in an employment agreement or offer letter. In general, the Company found a
lack of significant issues with respect to new hire grants. Compensation expense was required to
be recorded for administrative and error corrections and in a small number of cases where it was
determined that an employee received an award with an effective date earlier than their actual
start date, or where the amount of the grant was negotiated or otherwise selected after the
employee began working at the Company. Additionally, during certain limited periods, due to a
limited number of options being available to grant, the Company issued certain new hire grants at a
later date along with the periods anniversary grants at the low price of the month or quarter, in
which case the Company determined that alternate measurement dates were required. The Company
recorded a pre-tax compensation expense adjustment totaling $0.7 million for new hire grants during
the Relevant Period.
Program Grants. The Company had numerous routine grant programs under which options were
awarded to employees who participated on specific teams within the Company, completed certain
training programs or achieved certain goals in their jobs. These options (generally 50 to 250
options) were typically only granted to individual employees below a certain level. Although these
grants were routinely made on an annual or quarterly basis, no official written policies existed
describing the exact criteria or timing for each grant program. Not all of the grants awarded
pursuant to these programs could be identified due to incomplete or inconsistent documentation.
The Company typically determined the most supportable measurement date based on communication of
the list of recipients and the respective number of options to be granted to Stock Plan
Administration. In those instances where the review failed to reveal a specific date when lists
were received in Stock Plan Administration, the Company selected the date the employee record of
the stock options was added to the Companys stock plan administration database application as the
measurement date. The Company recorded a pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense totaling $0.6
million for these program grants during the Relevant Period.
For some grants, the Company identified no supporting documentation to determine the timing of
the approval of the terms of the grant. In these instances, the Company selected the date the
employee record of the stock options was added to the Companys stock plan administration database
application as the measurement date.
17
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
Effect of the Restatement Adjustments on our Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table presents the effect of the financial statement restatement adjustments on
the Companys previously reported consolidated statements of earnings for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Operations(B) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
806,038 |
|
|
$ |
(73,214 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
732,824 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
703,745 |
|
|
|
(68,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
635,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
102,293 |
|
|
|
(5,187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,106 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
80,045 |
|
|
|
(2,940 |
) |
|
|
(1,000 |
)(A) |
|
|
76,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
22,248 |
|
|
|
(2,247 |
) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
21,001 |
|
Non-operating (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(922 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
797 |
|
Net foreign currency exchange loss |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
22,179 |
|
|
|
(2,246 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
20,933 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
7,965 |
|
|
|
(864 |
) |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
7,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
|
14,214 |
|
|
|
(1,382 |
) |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
13,442 |
|
Net earnings from
discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
14,214 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
610 |
|
|
$ |
14,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued
operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued
operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
48,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
48,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
48,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Adjustment to record a legal settlement expense that was recorded in the first quarter of 2006, which should have been recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. |
|
(B) |
|
Adjustment to reclassify the operations of Direct Alliance and PC Wholesale to discontinued operations as described in Note 11. |
18
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
The following table presents the effect of the restatement adjustments on the Companys
previously reported cash flow amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Operations(C) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
14,214 |
|
|
$ |
(1,382 |
) |
|
$ |
610 |
(A) |
|
$ |
13,442 |
|
Plus: net earnings from discontinued
operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
14,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
14,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,480 |
|
|
|
(875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,605 |
|
Provisions for losses on accounts receivable |
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
863 |
|
Write-downs of inventories |
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,041 |
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
3,475 |
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,172 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from employee gains on
stock-based compensation |
|
|
(1,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
907 |
(B) |
|
|
(848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accounts receivable |
|
|
61,990 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,973 |
|
Decrease in inventories |
|
|
35,769 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,765 |
|
Increase in other current assets |
|
|
(950 |
) |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(835 |
) |
Decrease in other assets |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258 |
|
Decrease in accounts payable |
|
|
(7,625 |
) |
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,934 |
) |
Decrease in inventories financing facility |
|
|
(4,281 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,281 |
) |
Decrease in deferred revenue |
|
|
(1,018 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
5,766 |
|
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(610 |
)(A) |
|
|
4,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
114,189 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
115,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(10,725 |
) |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(10,725 |
) |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on short-term financing facility |
|
|
(45,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,000 |
) |
Net borrowings on line of credit |
|
|
(21,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,309 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of common stock under
employee stock plans |
|
|
6,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,840 |
|
Excess tax benefit from employee gains on
stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(907 |
)(B) |
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(57,714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(907 |
) |
|
|
(58,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Operations(C) |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
As Restated |
|
Cash flows from discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(322 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,070 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued operation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange effect on cash flow |
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
47,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,692 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of
the year |
|
|
35,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year |
|
$ |
82,837 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
Adjustment to record a legal settlement expense that was recorded in the first quarter of 2006, which should have been recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. |
|
(B) |
|
Adjustment to correct presentation of the excess tax benefit from employee gains on stock based compensation. |
|
(C) |
|
Adjustment to reclassify the operations of Direct Alliance and PC Wholesale to discontinued operations as described in Note 11. |
Related Proceedings
In October 2006, we received a letter of informal inquiry from the SEC requesting certain
documents relating to our stock option grants and practices. We cannot predict the outcome of this investigation.
3. Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net earnings from continuing operations available to common
stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each quarter.
Diluted EPS includes the effect of stock options assumed to be exercised and restricted stock using
the treasury stock method. A reconciliation of the denominators of the basic and diluted EPS
calculations is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
12,296 |
|
|
$ |
13,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used to compute basic EPS |
|
|
49,010 |
|
|
|
48,002 |
|
Dilutive potential common shares due to dilutive
options and restricted stock |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used to compute diluted
EPS |
|
|
49,291 |
|
|
|
48,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
20
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
The following weighted-average outstanding stock options during the three months ended March
31, 2007 and 2006 were not included in the diluted EPS calculations because the exercise prices of
these options were greater than the average market price of our common stock during the respective
periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Weighted-average outstanding stock
options excluded from the diluted
EPS calculation |
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for quarter ended March 31, 2007 are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
APAC |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
217,469 |
|
|
$ |
62,714 |
|
|
$ |
16,598 |
|
|
$ |
296,781 |
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
217,537 |
|
|
$ |
63,497 |
|
|
$ |
16,872 |
|
|
$ |
297,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values
assigned to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed from
previous acquisitions. In accordance with current accounting standards, goodwill is not amortized
and will be tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year.
5. Debt
Our long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Term loan |
|
$ |
67,500 |
|
|
$ |
71,250 |
|
Accounts receivable securitization financing facility |
|
|
126,000 |
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
193,500 |
|
|
|
239,250 |
|
Less: current portion of term loan |
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
178,500 |
|
|
$ |
224,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 7, 2006, we entered into a credit agreement with various financial institutions
that provides new credit facilities of up to $150,000,000 to finance, in part, the acquisition of
Software Spectrum and for general corporate purposes. The credit facilities are composed of a
five-year revolving credit facility in the amount of $75,000,000 and a five-year term loan facility
in the amount of $75,000,000. Additionally, we amended our accounts receivable securitization
financing facility to increase the maximum funding under the facility from $200,000,000 to
$225,000,000 and extend its maturity through September 7, 2009. The $67,500,000 outstanding under
the five-year term loan facility is payable in quarterly installments through September 2011.
Amounts outstanding under the term loan bear interest at a floating rate equal to the London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a spread of 0.625% to 1.375% (6.45% at March 31, 2007).
Deferred financing fees of $1,552,000 were capitalized in conjunction with the amendment to the
credit facility to finance the acquisition. Such fees are being amortized to interest expense over
the five-year term of the term loan facility using the effective interest method.
At March 31, 2007, $8,000,000 was outstanding under our $75,000,000 revolving line of credit.
Amounts outstanding under the revolving line of credit bear interest, payable quarterly, at a
floating rate equal to
21
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
the prime rate or, at our option, a LIBOR rate plus a pre-determined spread of 0.625% to
1.375% (8.25 and 6.44 per annum, respectively, at March 31, 2007). In addition, we pay a
commitment fee of 0.225% on the unused portion of the line. The credit facility expires on
September 7, 2009. Because we generally use this line for short-term borrowing needs, our
borrowings are generally at the prime rate and amounts outstanding are recorded as current
liabilities. The revolving line of credit also has a feature which allows us to increase the
availability on the line of credit by $37,500,000, upon request. We do not pay any fees on the
increased availability under the line until we activate the additional credit. At March 31, 2007,
$104,500,000 was available under the line of credit.
We have an agreement to sell receivables periodically to a special purpose accounts receivable
and financing entity (the SPE), which is exclusively engaged in purchasing receivables from us.
The SPE is a wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote entity that we have included in our consolidated
financial statements. The SPE funds its purchases by selling undivided interests in up to
$225,000,000 of eligible trade accounts receivable to a multi-seller conduit administered by an
independent financial institution. The sales to the conduit do not qualify for sale treatment
under SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment
of Liabilities, as we maintain effective control over the receivables that are sold. Accordingly,
the receivables remain recorded on our consolidated balance sheets. At March 31, 2007, the SPE
owned $361,466,000 of receivables recorded at fair value and included in our consolidated balance
sheet, of which $179,684,000 was eligible for funding. The financing facility expires September 7,
2009. Interest is payable monthly, and the interest rate at March 31, 2007 on borrowed funds was
5.98% per annum, including the 0.65% commitment fee on the total $225,000,000 facility. We also
pay a 0.25% usage fee on the unused balance. During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
2006, our weighted average interest rate per annum and weighted average borrowings under the
facility were 6.3% and $163,710,000 and 4.5% and $38,778,000, respectively. At March 31, 2007,
$126,000,000 was outstanding and $53,684,000 was available under the facility.
Our financing facilities contain various covenants, including the requirement that we comply
with leverage and minimum fixed charge ratio requirements. In addition, our credit facilities
prohibit the payment of cash dividends without the lenders consent and the requirement that we
provide annual and quarterly financial information which is reported on by our independent
registered public accounting firm to the lenders within a certain time period after the annual or
quarterly period ends. If we fail to comply with these covenants, the lenders would be able to
demand payment within a specified period of time. Because we were not current with our reporting
obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 beginning on September 30, 2006 and ending on
July 25, 2007, we would have been in violation of our financial reporting covenants had we not
obtained agreements with our lenders regarding the delivery of substitute financial information to
them. The agreements with our lenders waived our obligation to provide the filed reports and
waived any events of default occurring under the facility as a result of our failure to comply with
the financial reporting covenants. We intend to provide all late reports and current financial
statements to our lenders upon becoming current in our filings.
6. Income Taxes
Our effective tax rates from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007
and 2006 were 39.1% and 35.8%, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, our
effective tax rate was higher than the United States federal statutory rate of 35.0% due primarily
to state income taxes, net of federal tax, as well as non-deductible expenses related to executive
compensation and an increase in tax reserves in the three months ended March 31, 2007. For the
three months ended March 31, 2006, our effective tax rate differed from the United States federal
statutory rate of 35.0% due primarily to state income taxes, net of federal tax, offset partially
by lower tax rates on earnings in the United Kingdom and Canada. In addition, for the three months
ended March 31, 2006, our rate increases were offset by a benefit from the release of a reserve due
to the closing of an audit.
22
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
FIN 48 requires that companies recognize the effect of a tax position in their consolidated
financial statements if there is a greater likelihood than not of the position being sustained upon
audit based on the technical merits of the position. We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 effective
January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in no cumulative effect adjustment to our
retained earnings. However, in order to conform to the balance sheet presentation requirements of
FIN 48, we reclassified certain unrecognized tax benefits on our balance sheet from current assets
to non-current assets.
As of January 1, 2007 (the date we adopted FIN 48) and March 31, 2007 the Company had
approximately $10,300,000 and $10,800,000, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits. Of these
amounts, approximately $1,500,000 and $1,700,000, respectively, relates to accrued interest.
Our policy to classify interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions as a
component of income tax expense in our consolidated statement of earnings did not change as a
result of implementing the provisions of FIN 48.
As of January 1, 2007, if recognized, $1,100,000 of the liability associated with uncertain
tax positions would affect the Companys effective tax rate. The remaining $9,200,000 balance
arose from business combinations that, if recognized, ultimately would be recorded as an adjustment
to goodwill or a receivable with no effect on the Companys effective tax rate.
Several of our subsidiaries are currently under audit for the 2002 through 2005 tax years. It
is reasonably possible that the examination phase of these audits may conclude in the next twelve
months, and the related unrecognized tax benefits for certain tax positions will significantly
decrease. However, based on the status of the examination, an estimate of the range of reasonably
possible outcomes cannot be made at this time.
We, including our subsidiaries, file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and
many state and local and non-U.S. jurisdictions. In the U.S., federal income tax returns for 2003
through 2006 remain open to examination. For U.S. state and local as well as non-U.S.
jurisdictions, the statute of limitations generally varies between three and ten years.
7. Restructuring and Acquisition Integration Activities
Acquisition-Related Cost Capitalized in 2006 as a Cost of Acquisition of Software Spectrum
We recorded $11,414,000 of employee termination benefits and facility based costs in
connection with the integration of Software Spectrum. These costs were accounted for under EITF
Issue No. 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with Purchase Business Combinations, and
were based on the integration plans that have been committed to by management. Accordingly, these
costs were recognized as a liability assumed in the purchase business combination and included in
the allocation of the cost to acquire Software Spectrum.
The employee termination benefits relate to severance payments for Software Spectrum teammates
in North America and EMEA who have been or will be terminated in connection with integration plans.
The facilities based costs relate to future lease payments or lease termination costs associated
with vacating Software Spectrum facilities.
23
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
The following table details the changes in these liabilities during the three months ended
March 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
$ |
9,528 |
|
|
$ |
10,525 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(998 |
) |
|
|
(998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
$ |
8,640 |
|
|
$ |
9,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and restructuring activities expensed in 2005
During the year ended December 31, 2005, our EMEA operations moved into a new facility in the
United Kingdom and recorded restructuring costs of $7,458,000, of which $6,447,000 represented the
present value of the remaining lease obligations on the previous lease and $1,011,000 represented
duplicate rent expense for the new facility for the last half of 2005. At December 31, 2006, the
balance of these restructuring accruals was $6,468,000. During the three months ended March 31,
2007, adjustments of $85,000 and $15,000 were recorded to reflect the accretion of interest for the
present value of the remaining lease obligations and fluctuations in the British pound sterling
exchange rates, respectively. Cash payments of $164,000 were made during the three months ended
March 31, 2007, resulting in an accrual balance of $6,404,000 at March 31, 2007. In the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2007, approximately $5,554,000 is expected to
be paid in 2007 and is therefore included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and
$850,000 is expected to be paid through 2008 and is therefore included in long-term liabilities.
8. Stock-Based Compensation
On January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised
2004), Share Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which requires stock-based compensation to be
measured based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant and the corresponding expense to
be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange
for the award. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based
Payment (SAB No. 107), relating to SFAS No. 123R. We have applied the provisions of SAB No. 107
in our adoption of SFAS No. 123R. Prior to January 1, 2006, we issued stock options and restricted
stock shares. After January 1, 2006, we have elected to issue service-based and performance-based
restricted stock units (RSUs) instead of stock options and restricted stock shares.
We recorded the following pre-tax amounts for stock-based compensation, by operating segment,
in our consolidated financial statements (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
1,886 |
|
|
$ |
2,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMEA |
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APAC |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Continuing Operations |
|
$ |
2,265 |
|
|
$ |
3,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
Accounting for Stock Options After SFAS No. 123R Implementation
There were no stock options granted during the quarters ended March 31, 2007 or 2006, and
we do not currently plan to grant any stock options in 2007. The current expense for all
outstanding stock options granted prior to January 1, 2006, net of estimated forfeitures, has been
recognized in our consolidated statements of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
2006. Forfeitures were estimated and will be revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if
actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, we recorded in continuing operations
stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, net of forfeitures, of $1,267,000 and
$2,504,000, respectively. As of March 31, 2007, total compensation cost related to nonvested stock
options not yet recognized is $2,877,000, which is expected to be recognized over the next 0.65
years on a weighted-average basis.
We used the criteria in SFAS No. 123R to calculate and establish the beginning balance of the
additional paid-in capital pool (APIC pool) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based
compensation and to determine the subsequent effect on the APIC pool and consolidated statements of
cash flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that were outstanding
upon adoption of SFAS No. 123R.
The following table summarizes our stock option activity during the three months
ended March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
(in-the-money options) |
|
|
Life (in years) |
|
Outstanding at the beginning of period |
|
|
5,283,463 |
|
|
$ |
19.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(61,580 |
) |
|
$ |
14.45 |
|
|
$ |
257,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(125,794 |
) |
|
$ |
22.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(19,698 |
) |
|
$ |
19.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the end of period |
|
|
5,076,391 |
|
|
$ |
19.39 |
|
|
$ |
3,299,059 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the end of period |
|
|
3,748,799 |
|
|
$ |
19.52 |
|
|
$ |
2,939,452 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest |
|
|
5,005,042 |
|
|
$ |
19.40 |
|
|
$ |
3,283,393 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total pre-tax
intrinsic value, based on our closing stock price of $17.98 as of March 31, 2007, which would have
been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised options and sold the
underlying shares on that date.
The following table summarizes the status of outstanding stock options as of March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Range of |
|
Number of |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Exercise |
|
Options |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price Per |
|
Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life (in years) |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Share |
|
$5.14 18.35 |
|
|
1,109,225 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
|
|
$ |
15.03 |
|
|
|
948,713 |
|
|
$ |
14.90 |
|
18.36 19.24 |
|
|
1,033,169 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
$ |
18.60 |
|
|
|
499,934 |
|
|
$ |
18.65 |
|
19.25 19.93 |
|
|
1,030,925 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
|
|
$ |
19.75 |
|
|
|
655,458 |
|
|
$ |
19.74 |
|
20.00 21.25 |
|
|
1,124,251 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
$ |
21.01 |
|
|
|
865,873 |
|
|
$ |
21.03 |
|
21.30 41.00 |
|
|
778,821 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
|
|
$ |
23.87 |
|
|
|
778,821 |
|
|
$ |
23.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,076,391 |
|
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
$ |
19.39 |
|
|
|
3,748,799 |
|
|
$ |
19.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
Accounting for Restricted Stock
We have issued shares of restricted common stock and RSUs as incentives to certain
officers and teammates and plan to do so in the future. We recognize compensation expense
associated with the issuance of such shares and RSUs over the vesting period for each respective
share and RSU. The total compensation expense associated with restricted stock represents the
value based upon the number of shares or RSUs awarded multiplied by the closing price on the date
of grant. Recipients of restricted stock shares are entitled to receive any dividends declared on
our common stock and have voting rights, regardless of whether such shares have vested. Recipients
of RSUs do not have voting or dividend rights until the vesting conditions are satisfied and shares
are released.
Starting in 2006, we have elected to issue service-based and performance-based RSUs instead of
stock options and restricted stock shares. The number of RSUs ultimately awarded under the
performance-based RSUs will vary based on whether we achieve certain financial results. We will
record compensation expense each period based on our estimate of the most probable number of RSUs
that will be issued under the grants of performance-based RSUs. Additionally, the compensation
expense will be reduced for our estimate of forfeitures.
For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, we recorded in continuing
operations stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures, related to restricted stock shares
and RSUs of $998,000 and $668,000, respectively. As of March 31, 2007, total compensation cost
related to nonvested restricted stock shares and RSUs was $20,924,000, which is expected to be
recognized over the next 1.6 years on a weighted-average basis.
The following table summarizes our restricted stock activity, including restricted
stock shares and RSUs, during the three months ended March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested at the beginning of period |
|
|
760,531 |
|
|
$ |
20.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
649,186 |
|
|
$ |
20.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(190,952 |
) |
|
$ |
20.98 |
|
|
$ |
3,831,824 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(17,060 |
) |
|
$ |
19.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at the end of period |
|
|
1,201,705 |
|
|
$ |
20.12 |
|
|
$ |
21,606,655 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected to vest |
|
|
1,003,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,046,490 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The fair value of vested restricted stock shares and RSUs
represents the total pre-tax fair value, based on the closing stock price on the day of vesting, which would have been received by holders of restricted
stock shares and RSUs had all such holders sold their underlying shares on that date. |
|
(b) |
|
The aggregate fair value of the nonvested restricted stock shares and the
RSUs expected to vest represents the total pre-tax fair value, based on our closing stock price of
$17.98 as of March 31, 2007, which would have been received by holders of restricted stock shares
and RSUs had all such holders sold their underlying shares on that date. |
9. Share Repurchase Program
In January 2006, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50,000,000 of our
common stock. As of March 31, 2007, we have not purchased any shares under this authorization.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
There have been no significant changes from our description of commitments and contingencies
in Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
26
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
Legal Proceedings
We are party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business,
including asserted preference payment claims in client bankruptcy proceedings, claims of alleged
infringement of patents, trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property rights and claims
of alleged non-compliance with contract provisions.
In accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies (SFAS No. 5), we make a
provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the
amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly
and are adjusted to reflect the effects of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal
counsel and other information and events pertaining to a particular claim. Although litigation is
inherently unpredictable, we believe that we have adequate provisions for any probable and
estimable losses. It is possible, nevertheless, that the results of our operations or cash flows
could be materially and adversely affected in any particular period by the resolution of a legal
proceeding. Legal expenses related to defense, negotiations, settlements, rulings and advice of
outside legal counsel are expensed as incurred.
11. Discontinued Operations
PC Wholesale
On March 1, 2007, we completed the sale of PC Wholesale, a division of our North America
operating segment that sells to other resellers. The transaction generated proceeds of $28.7
million including net assets sold that are subject to certain post-closing adjustments. We expect
to have resolution of the post-closing adjustments by the end of August 2007. Any post-closing
adjustments will adjust the gain recorded on the sale. The sale of PC Wholesale is consistent with
our strategic plan as we concluded that selling IT products to other resellers is not a core
element of our growth strategy.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (SFAS No. 144), we have accounted for PC Wholesale as a discontinued operation and we
have reported the results of operations of PC Wholesale as a discontinued operation in the
consolidated statements of earnings for all periods presented. We did not allocate interest,
general corporate overhead expense or non-specific vendor funding to the discontinued operation.
PC Wholesales accounts receivable and inventory was approximately $15 million and $6 million,
respectively at December 31, 2006. Other assets and liabilities of PC Wholesale included in the
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 were not material.
The following amounts represent PC Wholesales results of operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The following amounts have been segregated from
continuing operations and reflected in discontinued operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
30,142 |
|
|
$ |
56,079 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
29,092 |
|
|
|
54,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
1,947 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations before income taxes |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
Direct Alliance
On June 30, 2006, we completed the sale of 100% of the outstanding stock of Direct Alliance
for a purchase price of $46,500,000, subject to a working capital adjustment. The purchase price
did not include real estate and intercompany receivables, which had an estimated fair value of
$49,400,000 (book value of $43,237,000) and were distributed to us immediately prior to closing.
In addition to payment of the purchase price, the buyer is obligated to make a one-time bonus
payment to us if Direct Alliance achieves certain gross profit levels for the year ending December
31, 2006 (Earn Out). Additionally, the buyer is entitled to a claw back of the purchase price of
up to $5,000,000 if certain Direct Alliance client contracts are not renewed on terms prescribed in
the sale agreement. As of July 25, 2007, the company is in the process of negotiating the final
resolution of the Earn Out and the claw back. Additionally, we paid $2,696,000 to the holders of
1,997,500 exercised Direct Alliance stock options. This amount will be further adjusted for the
above described working capital adjustment, Earn Out and claw back. Adjustments for the above
described working capital adjustment, Earn Out, claw back and payments to holders of exercised
Direct Alliance stock options will also adjust the gain recorded on the sale.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we have reported the results of operations of Direct Alliance
as a discontinued operation in the consolidated statements of earnings for all periods presented.
We did not allocate interest or general corporate overhead expense to the discontinued operation.
The following amounts represent Direct Alliances results of operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2006. The following amounts have been segregated from continuing operations and
reflected in discontinued operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
17,135 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
13,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
3,240 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations before income taxes |
|
|
1,685 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
1,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
On June 30, 2006, in connection with the sale of Direct Alliance, we entered into a lease
agreement with Direct Alliance pursuant to which Direct Alliance will lease from us the facilities
it used prior to the sale. The initial lease term is for eighteen months starting July 1, 2006.
Accordingly, we have separately presented the value of the land and buildings as buildings held
for lease on the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2007. Lease income related to these
buildings was $435,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and is classified as net sales.
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, depreciation expense related to the buildings is
$187,000 and is classified as costs of goods sold.
12. Segment Information
We operate in three reportable geographic operating segments: North America; EMEA; and APAC.
Currently, our offerings in North America and the United Kingdom include brand-name IT hardware,
software and services. Our offerings in the remainder of our EMEA segment and in APAC currently
only include software and select software-related services.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosure About Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, (SFAS No. 131) requires disclosures of certain information
regarding operating segments, products and services, geographic areas of operation and major
clients. The method for determining
28
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
what information to report under SFAS No. 131 is based upon the management approach, or the way
that management organizes the operating segments within a company, for which separate financial
information is evaluated regularly by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) in deciding how
to allocate resources. Our CODM is our Chief Executive Officer.
All intercompany transactions are eliminated upon consolidation, and there are no differences
between the accounting policies used to measure profit and loss for our segments and on a
consolidated basis. Net sales are defined as net sales to external clients. None of our clients
exceeded ten percent of consolidated net sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
A portion of our operating segments selling and administrative expenses arise from shared
services and infrastructure that we have historically provided to them in order to realize
economies of scale and to efficiently use resources. These expenses, collectively identified as
corporate charges, include senior management expenses, legal, tax, insurance services, treasury and
other corporate infrastructure expenses. Charges are allocated to our operating segments, and the
allocations have been determined on a basis that we considered to be a reasonable reflection of the
utilization of services provided to or benefits received by the operating segments. Corporate
charges of $185,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, previously allocated to our discontinued
operation, Direct Alliance, have been reallocated to our North America segment.
The tables below present information about our reportable operating segments as of
and for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
APAC |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
777,201 |
|
|
$ |
327,376 |
|
|
$ |
19,398 |
|
|
$ |
1,123,975 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
665,285 |
|
|
|
288,905 |
|
|
|
16,610 |
|
|
|
970,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
111,916 |
|
|
|
38,471 |
|
|
|
2,788 |
|
|
|
153,175 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
94,770 |
|
|
|
32,011 |
|
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
129,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
17,146 |
|
|
$ |
6,460 |
|
|
$ |
(189 |
) |
|
|
23,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,207 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,296 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,974,243 |
|
|
$ |
420,658 |
|
|
$ |
32,201 |
|
|
$ |
1,554,963 |
a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a |
|
Consolidated total assets are shown net of intercompany eliminations and include corporate assets and assets of discontinued operations of $872,139 at March 31, 2007. |
29
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
APACb |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
612,879 |
|
|
$ |
119,945 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
732,824 |
|
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
533,371 |
|
|
|
102,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
635,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
79,508 |
|
|
|
17,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,106 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
62,055 |
|
|
|
14,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
$ |
17,453 |
|
|
$ |
3,548 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
21,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,933 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,442 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets As Restated (1) |
|
$ |
1,085,253 |
|
|
$ |
163,299 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
877,345 |
a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements and Note 11 Discontinued Operations. |
|
a |
|
Consolidated total assets are shown net of intercompany eliminations and include corporate assets and assets of discontinued operations of $ $371,207 at March 31, 2006. |
|
b |
|
Our APAC segment was added as a result of the acquisition of Software Spectrum on September 7, 2006.
|
30
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements
Background
We announced on October 19, 2006 that the Companys Board of Directors had appointed an
Options Subcommittee, comprised of independent directors, to conduct a review of the Companys
stock options. Certain present and former directors and executive officers of the Company were
named as defendants in a derivative lawsuit related to stock option practices from 1997 to 2002,
filed in Superior Court, County of Maricopa, Arizona on September 21, 2006. The Company had been
named as a nominal defendant in that action. On December 22, 2006, we filed a motion to dismiss
the complaint based on plaintiffs failure to make a pre-suit demand on the Companys Board of
Directors. Before the opposition to the motion was due, the plaintiff voluntarily asked the Court
to dismiss the lawsuit, and, on January 19, 2007, the Court granted the plaintiffs motion to
voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice. In addition, we announced on November 6, 2006
that on October 27, 2006, the Company received an informal inquiry from the SEC requesting certain
documents and information relating to the Companys stock option granting practices from January 1,
1996 to the present.
The Options Subcommittee was assisted by independent legal counsel and independent forensic
accounting consultants. At the conclusion of its review, the Options Subcommittee reported its
findings to the Companys Board of Directors and to KPMG LLP, the Companys independent registered
public accounting firm, on March 9, 2007 and March 13, 2007, respectively. Management, assisted by
its own independent legal counsel and independent forensic consultants, then undertook an analysis
of the results of the Options Subcommittees review, as well as all stock option activity during
the period after the Companys initial public offering on January 24, 1995 through November 30,
2005, the last date on which we granted stock options (the Relevant Period).
In a Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2007, we reported that based on the findings of the Options
Subcommittee and the conclusions reached to date by management in its analysis, our previously
issued financial statements would require restatement and should no longer be relied upon.
We determined, based upon the Options Subcommittees review and the Companys analysis, that
for accounting purposes, the dates initially used to measure compensation expense for various stock
option grants to employees, executive officers and outside non-employee directors during the period
could not be relied upon. The revised measurement dates identified for accounting purposes differed
from the originally selected measurement dates due primarily to (i) insufficient or incomplete
approvals, (ii) inadequate or incomplete establishment of the terms of the grants, including the
list of individual recipients, and (iii) the use of hindsight to select exercise prices. The
restated consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006 and in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reflect the corrections resulting
from our determination.
We have incurred substantial expenses related to the Options Subcommittees review and the
Companys analysis. We have incurred approximately $11.8 million in costs for legal fees, external
audit firm fees and external consulting fees through June 30, 2007 and anticipate approximately $3
million in additional fees will be incurred through August 2007 in the completion of financial
statement restatement and related matters.
In addition to the restatements for stock-based compensation, we recorded a pre-tax adjustment
for $1.0 million to record a legal settlement expense that was recorded in the first quarter of
2006, which should have been recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. The tax effect of this
adjustment was $0.4 million.
31
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
Restatement Adjustments
Our restated consolidated financial statements contained in this Form 10-Q incorporate
stock-based compensation expense, including the income tax impacts related to the restatement
adjustments. The restatement adjustments result in a $30.9 million reduction of retained earnings
as of December 31, 2005. The total restatement impact for the years ended December 31, 1995 through
December 31, 2005, of $30.9 million, net of related tax benefits of $16.5 million, has been
reflected as a prior period adjustment to beginning retained earnings as of January 1, 2006.
In addition to the restatements for stock-based compensation, we recorded a pre-tax adjustment
for $1.0 million to record a legal settlement expense that was recorded in the first quarter of
2006, which should have been recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. The tax effect of this
adjustment was $0.4 million.
32
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
The tables below present the decrease (increase) in net earnings resulting from the individual
restatement adjustments for each respective period presented and are explained in further detail
following the table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2000 |
|
Stock option compensation from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary Grants |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
3,510 |
|
|
$ |
11,716 |
|
|
$ |
4,190 |
|
|
$ |
5,830 |
|
Anniversary Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
Promotion Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
New Hire Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Program Grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock compensation expense
from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other miscellaneous accounting
adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to record legal
settlement in appropriate period |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other miscellaneous
accounting adjustments |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
4,331 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations |
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
|
8,486 |
|
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
|
4,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock option compensation
expense from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
4,834 |
|
|
|
2,951 |
|
|
|
2,344 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to net earnings
from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
3,182 |
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to net earnings
before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
2,629 |
|
|
|
11,668 |
|
|
|
6,032 |
|
|
|
6,378 |
|
Total adjustments to cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total decrease (increase) in net
earnings |
|
$ |
(610 |
) |
|
$ |
684 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
2,629 |
|
|
$ |
11,668 |
|
|
$ |
6,032 |
|
|
$ |
6,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
1997 |
|
|
1996 |
|
|
1995 |
|
|
Total |
|
Stock option compensation from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary Grants |
|
$ |
1,341 |
|
|
$ |
1,654 |
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
29,026 |
|
Anniversary Grants |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,347 |
|
Promotion Grants |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
551 |
|
New Hire Grants |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
Program Grants |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock compensation expense
from continuing operations |
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
35,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other miscellaneous accounting
adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to record legal
settlement in appropriate period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other miscellaneous
accounting adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
35,018 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to earnings
from continuing operations |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
22,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock option compensation
expense from discontinued
operations |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12,381 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to net earnings
from discontinued operations |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments to net earnings
before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle |
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
30,862 |
|
Total adjustments to cumulative
effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total decrease (increase) in net
earnings |
|
$ |
1,889 |
|
|
$ |
1,596 |
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
30,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Compensation These adjustments are from our determination, based upon the
Options Subcommittees review and the Companys analysis, that, for accounting purposes, the dates
initially used to measure compensation expense for numerous option grants to employees, executive
officers and outside non-employee directors during the period could not be relied upon for various
categories of option grants including: (i) discretionary grants of various types; (ii) anniversary
grants; (iii) promotion grants; (iv) new hire grants; and (v) program grants. The revised
measurement dates identified for accounting purposes differed from the originally selected
measurement dates due primarily to: (i) insufficient or incomplete approvals; (ii) inadequate or
incomplete establishment of the terms of the grants, including the list of individual recipients;
and (iii) the use of hindsight to select exercise prices.
Specifically, for each of the categories of option grants discussed in more detail under
Accounting Considerations below, we noted the following:
Stock option grants with insufficient or incomplete approvals. The Company determined that
the original recorded grant date could not be relied on because there was correspondence or other
evidence that indicated that not all required approvals had been obtained, including for certain
grants, Compensation Committee approval. The Company remeasured these option grants with a revised
measurement date supported by the required level of
34
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
approval, as described below, and accounted for these grants as fixed awards under Accounting
Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.
Inadequate or incomplete establishment of the terms of the grants. The Company determined
that for certain stock option grants, the number of shares and the exercise price were not known
with finality at the original measurement date. The Company determined that the original recorded
grant date could not be relied on because there was correspondence or other evidence that indicated
that the Company had not finalized the number of stock options allocated to each individual
recipient and the related exercise price. Based on available supporting documentation, the Company
determined the date by which the number of stock options to be awarded to each recipient was
finalized and the other terms of the award were established and accounted for these grants as fixed
awards under APB 25.
The use of hindsight to select exercise prices. As noted below, the Company followed an
informal policy of awarding options to individual employees in recognition of the anniversary of
their employment with the Company or in conjunction with employee promotions using hindsight to
select the exercise price. In many instances, little or no documentation to support dates selected
for option grants could be located by the Company. Further, instances of favorable, retrospective
date selection of discretionary grants were identified. Also, as noted below, the investigation
noted instances of inadequate documentation, or retrospective date selection, relating to the award
of grants to the Companys top three executive officers, all of which required Compensation
Committee approval. Based on available supporting documentation, the Company determined a revised
measurement date and accounted for these grants as fixed awards under APB 25.
Other Miscellaneous Accounting Adjustments In addition to the restatements for stock-based
compensation, we recorded a pre-tax adjustment for $1.0 million to record a legal settlement
expense that was recorded in the first quarter of 2006, which should have been recorded in the
fourth quarter of 2005. The tax effect of this adjustment was $0.4 million.
Income Tax Benefit We recorded a net income tax benefit of approximately $16.5 million in
connection with the stock option-related compensation charges during the period from fiscal year
1995 to December 31, 2005. This tax benefit has resulted in an increase of our deferred tax assets
for most U.S. affected stock options prior to the exercise or forfeiture of the related options.
With the exception of UK employees exercising options after 2002, the Company recorded no tax
benefit or deferred tax asset for affected stock options granted to non-U.S. employees because we
determined that we could not receive tax benefits for these options. Further, we limited the
deferred tax assets recorded for affected stock options granted to certain highly paid officers to
reflect estimated limitations on tax deductibility under Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). Upon
exercise or forfeiture of the underlying options, the excess or deficiency in deferred tax assets
is written-off to paid-in capital in the period of exercise or forfeiture.
Payroll taxes, interest and penalties Management is considering possible ways to address the
impact that Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code may have as a result of the exercise price of
stock options being less than the fair market value of our common stock on the revised measurement
date. Section 409A imposes additional taxes to our employees on stock options granted with an
exercise price lower than the fair market value on the date of grant that vest after December 31,
2004. The Internal Revenue Service has issued transition rules under Section 409A that allows for
a correction, or cure, for options subject to Section 409A. We may offer the holders of
outstanding options the opportunity to affect a cure of all affected stock options. In connection
with this cure, we may make cash bonus payments in an aggregate amount of up to $200,000 in 2008 to
our non-officer employees.
Accounting Considerations Stock-Based Compensation
We originally accounted for all employee, officer and director stock option grants as fixed
grants under APB 25, using a measurement date of the recorded grant date. We issued all grants with
an exercise price equal to
35
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
the fair market value of our common stock on the recorded grant date, and therefore originally
recorded no stock-based compensation expense.
As a result of the findings of the Options Subcommittee, and our own further review of our
stock option granting practices, we determined that the measurement dates for certain stock option
grants differed from the recorded grant dates for such grants. Based on the analysis described
below, the Company concluded that it was appropriate to revise the measurement dates for these
grants based upon its findings. The Company calculated stock-based compensation expense under APB
25 based upon the intrinsic value as of the adjusted measurement dates of stock option awards
determined to be fixed under APB 25 and the vesting provisions of the underlying options. The
Company calculated the intrinsic value on the adjusted measurement date as the closing price of its
common stock on such date as reported on the NASDAQ National Market, now the NASDAQ Global Select
Market, less the exercise price per share of common stock as stated in the underlying stock option
agreement, multiplied by the number of shares subject to such stock option award. The Company
recognizes these amounts as compensation expense over the vesting period of the underlying options
in accordance with the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 28, Accounting for Stock Appreciation
Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans. We also determined that variable accounting
treatment was appropriate under APB 25 for certain stock option grants for which evidence was
obtained that the terms of the options may have been communicated to those recipients and that
those terms were subsequently modified (stock option grants cancelled and repriced). When variable
accounting is applied to stock option grants, we remeasure, and report in our consolidated
statements of earnings, the intrinsic value of the options at the end of each reporting period
until the options are exercised, cancelled or expire unexercised.
The Company determined the most supportable measurement dates for each of the various
categories of options grants as follows:
Discretionary Grants. Discretionary grants included grants to the Companys outside
directors, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), President and Chief Financial Officer (the three
highest ranking executives of the Company), other Section 16 Officers, and all other Company
employees.
The Company determined that it had granted stock options to its outside directors pursuant to
the Companys stock plans or Board of Directors minutes in the majority of instances; however, in
a few instances, certain grants to these individuals require alternative measurement dates based on
the approval dates specified in plan documents or signed minutes. The Company recorded a pre-tax
adjustment to compensation expense totaling less than $0.1 million associated with all grants to
outside directors during the Relevant Period.
During the Relevant Period, the Company followed a practice of requiring Compensation
Committee approval of the stock option awards to the three highest ranking executives of the
Company. For some grants, the Compensation Committee minutes do not indicate approval of an award.
In other instances, the Company either did not locate minutes or the evidence was inconclusive
concerning when a specific meeting occurred. The Company determined that certain grants to these
individuals require alternative measurement dates. For example, due to inconclusive evidence
regarding the date of Compensation Committee approval, because the Board had approved the Proxy
Statement in which the award was specifically listed, the Proxy Statement filing date was selected
as the best evidence of a measurement date for the award. The Company recorded a pre-tax
adjustment to compensation expense totaling $13.3 million for all grants to the three highest
ranking executives of the Company during the Relevant Period. Alternatively, for those grants
where the Proxy Statement filing date was selected, had we used the highest or lowest closing price
of our common stock between the grant date and the Proxy Statement filing date as the revised
measurement date (as a measurement date could have occurred on any date between those two dates),
the pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense would have been $3.2 million higher using the
highest price and $6.9 million lower using the lowest price.
36
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
Prior to May 16, 2003, the CEO approved stock option awards to Section 16 Officers. Evidence
of CEO approval typically consisted of an email containing the grant terms. Effective with the May
16, 2003 Compensation Committee meeting, the Compensation Committee was required to approve grants
to the Section 16 Officers. Evidence of Compensation Committee approval included Compensation
Committee minutes or a signed Unanimous Written Consent (UWC). The Company determined that
certain grants to these individuals require alternative measurement dates based on the date of
approval identified in the supporting documentation. The Company recorded a pre-tax adjustment to
compensation expense totaling $9.5 million in connection with discretionary grants to Section 16
Officers, in addition to the $13.3 million pre-tax adjustment for grants to the three highest
ranking executives of the Company, during the Relevant Period.
Throughout most of the Relevant Period, the Companys option plans granted discretion to the
CEO to award option grants to any Company employee, other than the top three executives. The CEO
in turn authorized a defined number of options in connection with certain discretionary grants
during the Relevant Period that were allocated by certain senior executives amongst employees
within particular business units. In certain instances, the review revealed that lists of grantees
within specified business units had not been finalized as of the grant date. Where required, the
Company identified alternative measurement dates for these discretionary grants and recorded the
required pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense totaling $7.9 million during the Relevant
Period.
During the Relevant Period, the Company also granted annual performance-based options to
employees at the discretion of certain executives and managers within each business unit. Based on
the supporting documentation, the business units finalized the list of awards by person on
different dates. The Company reconciled each list to the actual awards contained in the Companys
stock plan administration database to determine the date by which each business units list was
finalized. The Company recorded a pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense totaling $6.5 million
for six grant dates during the Relevant Period that primarily related to annual performance
reviews.
Anniversary Grants. Throughout the Relevant Period, the Company followed an informal policy
of awarding options to individual employees in recognition of the anniversary of their employment
with the Company or in conjunction with employee promotions. The number of these options was
determined by the employees level within the Company, or, in the case of promotion grants, the
level to which the employee was promoted. The majority of these grants were modest in size,
generally 500 options or less. In the case of senior management, anniversary or promotion grants
could be much larger, at 5,000 or 7,500 options. Occasionally, very senior executives, other than
the top three executives, received larger grants for anniversaries or promotions, but these were
relatively few and were generally done on a case-by-case basis.
The Options Subcommittee review indicated that the Companys anniversary related options were
granted with measurement dates determined by three general methods, depending upon the time period
in the Relevant Period. From the beginning of the Relevant Period through the end of 1998,
anniversary grants were generally granted with a measurement date on an employees actual
anniversary date. For a period of time between 1999 and 2002, the grant dates generally were
selected retrospectively based on either the low price of a month or the low price of the quarter.
In the third quarter of 2002, the Company began a practice of awarding anniversary grants on the
15th day of each month for the balance of 2002, and in January 2003, the Company
essentially ceased making anniversary grants, except for minimal contractual grants to certain
United Kingdom employees which continued into 2005.
The Company used email correspondence or other documentation maintained in the Stock Plan
Administration files and information obtained from the Companys human resources system and payroll
records to determine each employees anniversary date based on the employees hire (and
corresponding anniversary) date. The general granting practice for anniversary awards in place at
the relevant point in time was used to determine the appropriate measurement date for each
employees anniversary award. For a limited number of grants, absent evidence of the
employees hire date, the date the employee record of the stock options was added to
37
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
the Companys stock plan administration database application was used as the measurement date
for the awards identified as anniversary grants. For periods where the Company issued anniversary
grants using quarterly or monthly lows, or other low prices, alternate measurement dates were
required. The Company recorded a pre-tax compensation expense adjustment totaling $6.6 million for
anniversary grants during the Relevant Period.
Promotion Grants. Promotion grants were generally handled in the same manner as anniversary
grants. In some instances, promotion grants were awarded on the promotion effective date and other
times at the low price of the month or quarter. The Companys analysis revealed that the Company
had a general practice of granting promotion options on the employees promotion effective dates
from 1998 through 2000. The Company selected either the promotion effective date, if available, or
the date the employee record of the stock options was added to the Companys stock plan
administration database application, if the promotion effective date was not available, as the
measurement date for the promotion grants issued from 1998 through 2000. For subsequent periods
where the Company issued promotion grants using quarterly or monthly lows, or other low prices,
alternate measurement dates were required. The Company recorded a pre-tax compensation expense
adjustment totaling $2.2 million for promotion grants during the Relevant Period.
New Hire Grants. Throughout the Relevant Period, the Company issued an option grant to each
new employee on the employees start date. The Company had a uniform practice of granting a
specific number of options depending on the incoming employees level within the Company. For
example, the lowest level employees would receive 50 options on their start date, while certain
managers might receive 2,500 options. Senior executive officers would typically receive much
larger grants upon joining the Company, and those grants were typically negotiated as part of a
total compensation package that were reflected in an employment agreement or offer letter. In
general, the Company found a lack of significant issues with respect to new hire grants.
Compensation expense was required to be recorded for administrative and error corrections and in a
small number of cases where it was determined that an employee received an award with an effective
date earlier than their actual start date, or where the amount of the grant was negotiated or
otherwise selected after the employee began working at the Company. Additionally, during certain
limited periods, due to a limited number of options being available to grant, the Company issued
certain new hire grants at a later date along with the periods anniversary grants at the low price
of the month or quarter, in which case the Company determined that alternate measurement dates were
required. The Company recorded a pre-tax compensation expense adjustment totaling $0.7 million for
new hire grants during the Relevant Period.
Program Grants. The Company had numerous routine grant programs under which options were
awarded to employees who participated on specific teams within the Company, completed certain
training programs or achieved certain goals in their jobs. These options (generally 50 to 250
options) were typically only granted to individual employees below a certain level. Although these
grants were routinely made on an annual or quarterly basis, no official written policies existed
describing the exact criteria or timing for each grant program. Not all of the grants awarded
pursuant to these programs could be identified due to incomplete or inconsistent documentation.
The Company typically determined the most supportable measurement date based on communication of
the list of recipients and the respective number of options to be granted to Stock Plan
Administration. In those instances where the review failed to reveal a specific date when lists
were received in Stock Plan Administration, the Company selected the date the employee record of
the stock options was added to the Companys stock plan administration database application as the
measurement date. The Company recorded a pre-tax adjustment to compensation expense totaling $0.6
million for these program grants during the Relevant Period.
For some grants, the Company identified no supporting documentation to determine the timing of
the approval of the terms of the grant. In these instances, the Company selected the date the
employee record of the stock options was added to the Companys stock plan administration database
application as the measurement date.
38
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
Related Proceedings
In October 2006, we received a letter of informal inquiry from the SEC requesting certain
documents relating to our stock option grants and practices. We have cooperated with the SEC and
will continue to do so. We cannot predict the outcome of this investigation.
Quarterly Overview
We are a leading provider of brand-name information technology (IT) hardware, software
and services to large enterprises, small to medium-sized businesses (SMB) and public sector
institutions in North America; EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa); and APAC (Asia-Pacific).
Currently, our offerings in North America and the United Kingdom include brand-name IT
hardware, software and services. Our offerings in the remainder of our EMEA segment and in APAC
currently only include software and select software-related services.
On March 1, 2007, we completed the sale of PC Wholesale, a division of our North America
operating segment that sells to other resellers. The transaction generated proceeds of $28.7
million, including net assets that are subject to certain post-closing adjustments. The sale is
consistent with our strategic plan as we concluded that selling IT products to other resellers is
not a core element of our growth strategy.
Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2007 increased 53% to $1,124.0 million from
$733.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Net earnings for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 increased 17% to $17.3 million from $14.8 million for the three months ended March
31, 2006. Net earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2007 include the gain on sale of PC Wholesale of $7.9
million, $4.8 million net of tax, and expenses of $5.7 million, $3.5 million net of tax, for legal
and professional fees associated with the ongoing stock option review.
Overviews of each of our operating segments are discussed below and reconciliations of segment
results of operations to consolidated results of operations can be found in Note 12 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements provided in Item 1 of this report.
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is intended to
assist in the understanding of our consolidated financial statements, the changes in certain key
items in those consolidated financial statements from year to year and the primary factors that
contributed to those changes, as well as how certain critical accounting estimates affect our
consolidated financial statements.
Our North America net sales increased 27% from $777.2 million in the three months ended March
31, 2007 from $612.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2006, due primarily to the
acquisition of Software Spectrum. Within North America, the highlight of the quarter was a strong
gross profit performance, evidenced by growth of 41% over the prior year, driven by contributions
from hardware, software, and services. We were particularly pleased to see our services business
continue to post strong growth, increasing net sales by 72% for the three months ended March 31,
2007 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006. This growth was driven primarily by strong
sales of field services and third party warranties but was also due to the acquisition of Software
Spectrum. Also included in our North America segment results was $5.2 million of legal and
professional fees associated with the ongoing stock option review. Overall North America earnings
from operations decreased 2% from $17.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 to $17.1
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Our EMEA operations, which included only the United Kingdom in the three months ended March
31, 2006, recognized net sales that were up 173% from $119.9 million in three months ended March
31, 2006 to
39
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
$327.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2007 due primarily to the acquisition of
Software Spectrum. Within EMEA, our software category performed well across all regions, and
within the UK our hardware and services categories performed very well, and we believe grew faster
than the market for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Also included in our EMEA segment
results was $455,000 of legal and professional fees associated with the ongoing stock option
review. Overall EMEA earnings from operations increased 82% from $3.5 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 to $6.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Our APAC segment continues to perform very well as we believe it grew faster than the market
and contributed net sales of $19.4 million and gross profit of $2.8 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2007. Although this operating segment represents a small percentage of our
consolidated results, we are excited about the growth opportunities this region brings.
Critical Accounting Estimates
General
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The preparation of these consolidated financial
statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, net sales, costs of goods sold and expenses. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Members of our senior
management have discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the
Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. Actual results, however, may differ from estimates we
have made.
In addition to the to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting estimates in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, we adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007.
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for uncertainties in income tax law. This
interpretation prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition,
measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken
in income tax returns.
40
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth for the periods presented certain financial data as a
percentage of net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Costs of goods sold |
|
|
86.4 |
|
|
|
86.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Non-operating (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations
before
income taxes |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from continuing operations |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operation,
net
of taxes |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operation,
net
of taxes |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings from discontinued operation |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Item 1, Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Net Sales. Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2007 increased 53% to $1.12 billion
from $732.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The increase in sales is mainly due
to the acquisition of Software Spectrum on September 7, 2006. Our net sales by operating segment
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
% Change |
|
North America |
|
$ |
777,201 |
|
|
$ |
612,879 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
EMEA |
|
|
327,376 |
|
|
|
119,945 |
|
|
|
173 |
% |
APAC |
|
|
19,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
1,123,975 |
|
|
$ |
732,824 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Americas net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2007 increased 27% to
$777.2 million from $612.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, due primarily to the
acquisition of Software Spectrum. North America had 1,274 account executives at March 31, 2007, an
increase from 1,053 at March 31, 2006 due primarily to the acquisition of Software Spectrum. Net
sales per account executive in North America increased 7% to $614,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 from $576,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The average tenure of our
account executives in North America has increased from 3.9 years at March 31, 2006 to 4.4 years at
March 31, 2007. The increase is due primarily the addition of more tenured account executives with
the acquisition of Software Spectrum.
41
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
EMEAs net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2007 increased 173% to $327.4 million
from $119.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Overall, our growth in EMEA was due
to the acquisition of Software Spectrum, however, the EMEA segment performed well across all
regions. Within the United Kingdom, our hardware and software categories performed well and we
believe grew faster than the market. EMEA had 478 account executives at March 31, 2007, an
increase from 251 at March 31, 2006 due primarily to the acquisition of Software Spectrum. Net
sales per account executives in EMEA increased 48% to $686,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2007 compared to $464,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The average tenure of our
account executives in EMEA has increased from 2.4 years at March 31, 2006 to 2.9 years at March 31,
2007. The increase is due primarily to a decrease in account executive turnover and to the
addition of more tenured account executives with the acquisition of Software Spectrum.
APACs net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2007 were $19.4 million. We were
pleased with the results of our APAC segment as we believe that we grew faster than the market, and
we continue to be encouraged by the growth opportunities in this region.
Percentage of net sales by category for North America, EMEA and APAC were as follows for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
EMEA |
|
APAC |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
Sales Mix |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Notebooks and PDAs |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Desktops and Servers |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Network and Connectivity |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Storage Devices |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Supplies and Accessories |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Monitors and Video |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Printers |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Memory and Processors |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
NA |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hardware |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
NA |
Software |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
NA |
Services |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
<1 |
% |
|
|
<1 |
% |
|
|
<1 |
% |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In general, we continue to experience declines in average selling prices for most of our
hardware product categories, which requires us to sell more units in order to maintain or increase
the level of sales. With the acquisition of Software Spectrum, our product mix changed
significantly as noted above, with software representing a much greater percentage of our net
sales.
Gross Profit. The increase in sales of software licenses for which we receive only an
agency fee, as well as sales of software maintenance contracts and third-party warranties for which
only the gross profit is recorded as net sales, makes period-to-period comparability of net sales
and costs of goods sold more difficult. As a result, we believe that gross profit is a more
reliable measure of business performance and is more useful in comparing period-to-period trends
than net sales. Gross profit increased 58% to $153.2 million for the three months ended March 31,
2007 from $97.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, due primarily to the acquisition
of Software Spectrum. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit increased to 13.6% for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 from 13.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Our gross profit
and gross profit as a percent of net sales by operating segment for the three months ended March
31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows (in thousands):
42
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
Sales |
|
North America |
|
$ |
111,916 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
$ |
79,508 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
EMEA |
|
|
38,471 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
17,598 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
APAC |
|
|
2,788 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
153,175 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
$ |
97,106 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Americas gross profit increased for the three months ended March 31, 2007 by 41%
to $111.9 million from $79.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Gross profit per
account executive increased 18% from $74,800 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 to $88,400
for the three months ended March 31, 2007. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit increased to
14.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from 13.0% for the three months ended March 31,
2006 due primarily to increases in agency fees for Microsoft enterprise software agreement
renewals, increases in the sales of services and decreases in inventory write-downs due to
improvements in the aging of inventories. These increases were offset partially by decreases in
product margins, which includes vendor funding, and decreases in freight margins.
EMEAs gross profit increased for the three months ended March 31, 2007 by 119% to $38.5
million from $17.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Gross profit per account
executive increased 19% from $68,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006 to $80,700 for the
three months ended March 31, 2007. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit decreased to 11.8%
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from 14.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
The decrease in gross margin from the first quarter of 2006 was due primarily to decreases in
product margin, which includes vendor funding, and decreases in supplier discounts. These
decreases in gross margin were offset partially by increases in agency fees for Microsoft
enterprise software agreement renewals and decreases in inventory write-downs due to due to
improvements in the aging of inventories.
APAC reported a gross profit of $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007. As a
percentage of net sales, gross profit was 14.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Gross
profit per account executive was $52,100 for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Operating Expenses.
Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses increased to $129.8
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from $76.1 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and increased as a percent of net sales to 11.5% for the three months ended March
31, 2007 from 10.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2006, due primarily to the acquisition of
Software Spectrum. Selling and administrative expenses as a percent of net sales by operating
segment for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
% of Net |
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
94,770 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
$ |
62,055 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
EMEA |
|
|
32,011 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
14,050 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
APAC |
|
|
2,977 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
129,758 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
$ |
76,105 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Americas selling and administrative expenses increased for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 by 53% to $94.8 million from $62.1 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses increased to 12.2% for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 from 10.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Selling
and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2007 has
increased over the three months ended March 31, 2006 due to:
|
|
|
$5.2 million in legal and other professional fees associated with the stock option
review; |
43
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
|
|
|
increases in salaries and wages of approximately $16.0 million due mainly to the
acquisition of Software Spectrum, increases in sales incentive programs and increases in
bonus expenses due to increased overall financial performance; |
|
|
|
|
amortization of intangible assets acquired with the acquisition of Software Spectrum of
$1.8 million; and |
|
|
|
|
other integration-related expenses, such as travel, legal and accounting fees. |
EMEAs selling and administrative expenses increased 128% to $32.0 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 from $14.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. As a
percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses decreased to 9.8% for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 from 11.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The decrease in selling
and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2007
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006 was due primarily to increases in net sales
partially offset by:
|
|
|
increases in salaries and wages of approximately $13.0 million due mainly to the
acquisition of Software Spectrum and increases in bonus expenses due to increased overall
financial performance; |
|
|
|
|
amortization of intangible assets acquired with the acquisition of Software Spectrum of $1.0 million; |
|
|
|
|
other integration-related expenses, such as travel, legal and accounting fees; and |
|
|
|
|
$455,000 in legal and other professional fees associated with the stock option review. |
APACs selling and administrative expenses were $3.0 million for the three months ended March
31, 2007. As a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses were 15.3% for the
three months ended March 31, 2007.
Interest Income. Interest income of $2.1 million and $922,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, was generated through short-term investments. The increase
in interest income is due to a generally higher level of cash available to be invested in
short-term investments and increases in short term interest rates earned on those investments
during the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Interest Expense. Interest expense of $5.8 million and $797,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, primarily relates to borrowings under our financing
facilities. The increase in interest expense is due to increased borrowings outstanding in the
three months ended March 31, 2007 due to the acquisition of Software Spectrum and increases in
interest rates.
Net Foreign Currency Exchange Gain (Loss). Net foreign currency exchange gain was $654,000 for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to a net foreign currency exchange loss of $31,000
for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The gain for the three months ended March 31, 2007
consists primarily of foreign currency transaction gains or losses, including those for
intercompany balances that are not considered long-term in nature and gains or losses on
translation of foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities. The loss for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 is primarily related to transaction losses.
Other Expense, Net. Other expense, net, was $217,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2007 compared to $162,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006. These amounts consist
primarily of bank fees associated with our financing facilities and cash management and the
amortization of deferred financing fees.
Income Tax Expense. Our effective tax rate from continuing operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 was 39.1% compared to 35.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The
increase in the effective tax rate from continuing operations was due primarily to a decrease in
tax reserves in the first quarter of 2006 due to the closing of an audit, as well as an increase in
non-deductible expenses related to executive compensation and an increase in tax reserves in the
first quarter of 2007.
Earnings from Discontinued Operations. On March 1, 2007, we completed the sale of PC
Wholesale, and on June 30, 2006, we completed the sale of Direct Alliance. Accordingly, the
results of operations
44
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
attributable to PC Wholesale and Direct Alliance for all periods presented have been classified as
discontinued operations. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this
report for further discussion.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table sets forth for the periods presented certain consolidated cash
flow information for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Restated (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
39,379 |
|
|
$ |
113,604 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
20,318 |
|
|
|
(9,655 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(81,802 |
) |
|
|
56,807 |
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,392 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange effect on cash flow |
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(22,537 |
) |
|
|
47,692 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
54,697 |
|
|
|
35,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
32,160 |
|
|
$ |
82,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 2 Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Cash and Cash Flow
Our primary uses of cash in the past few years have been to fund our working capital
requirements, capital expenditures, repurchases of our common stock and repayments of debt incurred
to fund acquisitions.
Net cash provided by operating activities. Cash flows from operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 resulted primarily from net earnings from continuing operations before
depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation expense as well as decreases in accounts
receivable. These increases in operating cash flows were partially offset by decreases in accounts
payable. The decreases in accounts receivable and accounts payable are due to the seasonal
decrease in net sales. Cash flows from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006
resulted primarily from net earnings before depreciation and stock-based compensation, decreases in
accounts receivable and inventories. Accounts receivable decreased due to the seasonal decrease in
net sales. Inventories decreased due primarily to improvements in our supply chain activities and
fewer opportunistic purchases of inventory.
Our consolidated cash flow operating metrics for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Days sales outstanding in ending accounts receivable (DSOs) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Annualized inventory turns (excluding inventories available for sale) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Days purchases outstanding in ending accounts payable (DPOs) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
The increase in DSOs is due primarily to an increase in sales of software maintenance
contracts and third-party warranties where we bill the client the entire sales price but only
record the gross profit on the transaction in net sales. Additionally, we have seen an increase in
net sales with terms longer than 30 days, primarily related to our large enterprise and public
sector clients. The increase in inventory turns is primarily due to the decrease in inventories
primarily related to our operational improvements and decreases in opportunistic purchases. The
$28.1 million of inventories not available for sale at March 31, 2007 represents inventories
segregated pursuant to binding client contracts, which will be recorded as net sales when the
criteria for sales recognition are met. We
45
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
anticipate that our DSOs will continue to increase due to the purchase of Software Spectrum
which sells a large percentage to larger enterprise clients who generally have longer payment
terms. The increase in DPOs is due primarily to the timing of payments.
Assuming net sales continue to increase in the future, we expect that cash flow from
operations will be used, at least partially, to fund working capital as we typically pay our
suppliers on average terms that are shorter than the average terms granted to our clients in order
to take advantage of supplier discounts.
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities. Cash flows provided by investing
activities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was $20.3 million, which consisted of proceeds
of $28.7 million from our sale of PC Wholesale, a discontinued operation, offset partially by
capital expenditures of $9.1 million. Capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31,
2007 primarily related to investments to upgrade our IT systems to mySAP, including capitalized
costs of software developed for internal use, IT equipment and software licenses. Cash flows used
in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was $9.7 million due mainly to
purchases to capitalized costs of computer software developed for internal use and IT equipment.
We expect total capital expenditures in 2007 to be between $30.0 million and $35.0 million.
Net cash used in financing activities. Cash flows used in financing activities for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 were $81.8 million and
$56.8 million, respectively. During
the three months ended March 31, 2007, cash used in financing activities was primarily for net
repayments of outstanding debt of $52.8 million and decreases in book overdrafts of $31.5 million.
During the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, cash of $2.4 million and $6.8 million,
respectively, was provided by cash received from common stock issuances as a result of stock option
exercises.
In January 2006, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program that allows us to
purchase up to an additional $50.0 million of our common stock; however, no repurchases have been
made under this program since its inception.
We anticipate that cash flow from operations, together with the funds available under our
financing facilities, will be adequate to support our presently anticipated cash and working
capital requirements for operations over the next twelve months. Additionally, we expect to use
any excess cash primarily to reduce outstanding debt incurred in connection with the acquisition of
Software Spectrum.
Cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to U.S. income
taxation upon repatriation to the United States. For foreign entities not treated as branches for
U.S. tax purposes, we do not provide for U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of these
subsidiaries as earnings are reinvested and, in the opinion of management, will continue to be
reinvested indefinitely outside of the U.S.
As part of our long-term growth strategy, we intend to consider additional acquisition
opportunities from time to time, which may require additional debt or equity financing.
See Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part 1, Item 1 of this report for a
description of our financing facilities, including terms, amounts outstanding, amounts available
and weighted average borrowings and interest rates during the period.
Our financing facilities contain various covenants, including the requirement that we comply with
leverage and minimum fixed charge ratio requirements. In addition, our credit facilities prohibit
the payment of cash dividends without the lenders consent and the requirement that we provide
annual and quarterly financial information which is reported on by our independent registered
public accounting firm to the lenders within a certain time period after the annual or quarterly
period ends. If we fail to comply with these covenants, the lenders would be able to demand
payment within a specified period of time. Because we were not current with our reporting
obligations under the SEC Exchange Act of 1934 beginning on September 30, 2006 and ending on
46
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
July 25, 2007, we were not able to obtain reports from our independent registered public accounting
firm and, therefore, were in violation of our financial reporting covenant. We were able to obtain
a waiver letter from the lender which waived our obligation to provide the affected report from our
independent registered public accounting firm and waived any events of default occurring under the
facility as a result of our failure to comply with the covenant. We intend to provide all late
reports and current financial statements to our lenders upon becoming current in our filings.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have entered into off-balance sheet arrangements, which include guaranties and
indemnifications, as defined by the SECs Final Rule 67, Disclosure in Managements Discussion and
Analysis about Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations. The
guaranties and indemnifications are discussed in Item 8 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006. We believe that none of our off-balance sheet arrangements have, or
is reasonably likely to have, a material current or future effect on our financial condition, sales
or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report for a
description of recent accounting pronouncements, including our expected dates of adoption and the
anticipated effects on our financial statements and disclosures.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Interest Risk
We have interest rate exposure arising from our financing facilities, which have variable
interest rates. These variable interest rates are affected by changes in short-term interest
rates. We manage interest rate exposure by maintaining a conservative debt to equity ratio.
Although the credit agreement we entered into to finance in part the acquisition of Software
Spectrum increased our exposure to market risk from changes in interest rates, we believe that the
effect of reasonably possible near-term changes in interest rates on our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows will not be material. Our financing facilities expose net
earnings to changes in short-term interest rates since interest rates on the underlying obligations
are variable. We had $67.5 million outstanding under our term loan, $8.0 million outstanding under
our revolving line of credit and $126.0 million outstanding under our accounts receivable
securitization financing facility at March 31, 2007. The interest rates attributable to the term
loan, the line of credit and the financing facility were 6.45%, 8.25% and 5.98%, respectively, per
annum at December 31, 2006. A change in annual net earnings from continuing operations resulting
from a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in interest rates, without regard to the effects of
other possible occurrences, such as actions to mitigate this result, would approximate $1.0
million.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We have operation centers in the U.S., Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, France and
Australia, as well as sales offices in Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the
United Kingdom and the U.S., and sales presence in Austria, Ireland, Japan, New Zealand and Russia.
In each of these countries, the majority of sales, expenses and capital purchasing activities are
transacted in the respective functional currencies. Therefore, we have foreign currency
translation exposure for changes in exchange rates for these currencies. Changes in exchange rates
between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar may adversely affect our operating margins. For
example, if these foreign currencies appreciate against the U.S. dollar, it will become more
expensive in terms of U.S. dollars to pay expenses with foreign currencies. Because we operate in
numerous functional currencies, we
47
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
cannot predict the effect of future exchange-rate fluctuations on business and operating
results and significant rate fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on results of
operations and financial condition.
In addition, although our foreign subsidiaries have intercompany accounts that eliminate upon
consolidation, such accounts expose us to foreign currency rate movements. Exchange rate
fluctuations on short-term intercompany accounts are recorded in our consolidated statements of
earnings under Net foreign exchange (gain) loss, while exchange rate fluctuations on long-term
intercompany accounts are recorded in our consolidated balance sheets under accumulated other
comprehensive loss in stockholders equity. We also maintain cash accounts denominated in
currencies other than the local currency which expose us to foreign exchange rate movements.
We monitor our foreign currency exposure and may from time to time enter into hedging
transactions to manage this exposure. There were no hedging transactions during the quarter ended
March 31, 2007, and there were no hedging instruments outstanding at March 31, 2007.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as of the end of the period of this report, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) and
determined that, as a result of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting
described below, as of March 31, 2007 our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
SEC rules and forms.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Boards Auditing Standard No. 2 defines a material
weakness as a significant deficiency, or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in
there being a more than remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The Company identified a material weakness
in its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, arising from the combined
effect of the following control deficiencies in Companys accounting for equity based awards:
|
|
|
Inadequate policies and procedures to determine the grant date and
exercise price of equity awards; |
|
|
|
|
Inadequate supervision and training for personnel involved in the stock option
granting process; and |
|
|
|
|
Inadequate documentation and monitoring of the application of accounting
policies and procedures regarding equity awards. |
As a result of financial statement errors attributable to the material weakness described
above, we have filed a comprehensive Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 in which
we restated our consolidated statements of earnings, of stockholders equity and comprehensive
income and of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, our consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2005 and selected consolidated financial data for the years ended December
31, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and for each of the quarters in the year ended December 31, 2005 and
the quarters ended March 31, and June 30, 2006.
48
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined
in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31, 2007
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal
control over financial reporting.
Subsequent to December 31, 2006, we have begun taking several steps to remediate the material
weakness described in (a) above. We have implemented or are in the process of implementing
internal control improvements in the following areas:
|
|
|
implementing new policies and procedures to ensure compliance with accounting
principles applicable to equity compensation, including restricted stock grants, and
through training and additions to the staff; |
|
|
|
|
developing an equity compensation training program for all teammates involved
in the award of and accounting for equity compensation; |
|
|
|
|
restructuring reporting responsibility for the administration of our equity
compensation programs; and |
|
|
|
|
adopting a written policy governing the award of equity compensation,
including standardizing documentation of approvals of all relevant terms of equity
compensation awards. |
The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors, which was newly constituted in May 2007,
has already revised some of its policies and will now only approve equity compensation grants at
meetings and not by written consent. The Compensation Committee also has improved the process for
documenting its actions and ensuring the timely reporting of its actions to the Board of Directors.
(c) Inherent Limitations of Disclosure Controls and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Part II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business,
including asserted preference payment claims in client bankruptcy proceedings, claims of alleged
infringement of patents, trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property rights and claims
of alleged non-compliance with contract provisions.
In accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies (SFAS No. 5), we make a
provision for a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the
amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly
and are adjusted to reflect the effects of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal
counsel and other information and events pertaining to a particular claim. Although litigation is
inherently unpredictable, we believe that we have adequate provisions for any probable and
estimable losses. It is possible, nevertheless, that the results of our operations or cash flows
could be materially and adversely affected in any particular period by the resolution of a legal
proceeding. Legal expenses related to defense, negotiations, settlements, rulings and advice of
outside legal counsel are expensed as incurred.
49
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
In June 2006, our subsidiary, Software Spectrum, Inc. was named as a defendant in a civil
lawsuit, Allocco v. Gardner (Superior Court, County of San Diego), regarding certain software
resale transactions with Peregrine Systems, Inc. The subsidiary was named as successor to
Corporate Software & Technology, Inc. (CS&T) and alleges that during October 2000 CS&T
participated in or aided and abetted a fraudulent scheme by Peregrine to inflate Peregrines stock
price. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement by which we acquired Software Spectrum, Inc. from
Level 3 Communications, Inc. (Level 3, the former corporate parent of Software Spectrum, Inc.),
Level 3 has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold us harmless for this matter. The discovery
process is on-going, and we strongly dispute any allegations of participation in fraudulent
behavior. On our behalf Level 3 is vigorously defending this matter.
In October 2006, we received a letter of informal inquiry from the SEC requesting certain
documents relating to our stock option grants and practices. We have cooperated with the SEC and
will continue to do so. We cannot predict the outcome of this investigation.
Software Spectrum, as successor to CST, is party to litigation brought in the Belgian courts
regarding a dispute over the terms of a tender awarded by the Belgian Ministry of Defence (MOD)
in November 2000. In February 2001, CST brought a breach of contract suit against MOD in the Court
of First Instance in Brussels and claimed breach of contract damages in the amount of approximately
$150,000. MOD counterclaimed against CST for cost to cover in the amount of approximately
$2,700,000, and, in July 2002, CST added a Belgian subsidiary of Microsoft as a defendant. We
believe that MODs counterclaims are unfounded, and we are vigorously defending the claim.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks
facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainty not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the three months ended March 31,
2007.
We have never paid a cash dividend on our common stock, and our financing facilities prohibit
the payment of cash dividends without the lenders consent.
50
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
|
of Shares That May Yet be |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Publicly Announced |
|
|
Purchased Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
|
or Programs1 |
|
January 1, 2007 through
January 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,000,000 |
|
February 1, 2007 through
February 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000,000 |
|
March 31, 2007 through
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
On January 26, 2006, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of
up to $50,000,000 of our common stock. We made no repurchases under this program during the three months ended March 31, 2007. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
51
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
Item 6. Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits. (Unless otherwise noted, exhibits are filed herewith.)
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Insight Enterprises, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005 filed on February 17, 2006, File No. 0-25092). |
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
of Insight Enterprises, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, filed on
August 5, 2005, File No. 0-25092). |
3.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Insight Enterprises, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2007,
File No. 0-25092). |
4.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of
our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-86142) declared effective January
24, 1995). |
4.2
|
|
Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Current Report
on Form 8-K filed on March 17, 1999, File No. 0-25092). |
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. |
52
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: July 25, 2007 |
|
INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Richard A. Fennessy |
|
|
|
|
Richard A. Fennessy |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Stanley Laybourne |
|
|
|
|
Stanley Laybourne |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal financial officer) |
53