e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2009
Commission File Number: 001-32739
HealthSpring, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-1821898 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
9009 Carothers Parkway |
|
|
Suite 501 |
|
|
Franklin, Tennessee
|
|
37067 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(615) 291-7000
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2009 |
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 Per Share
|
|
57,578,469 Shares |
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1: |
|
Financial Statements |
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
295,010 |
|
|
$ |
282,240 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
139,741 |
|
|
|
74,398 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
3,259 |
|
Investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
24,812 |
|
|
|
24,750 |
|
Funds due for the benefit of members |
|
|
38,617 |
|
|
|
40,212 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
6,303 |
|
|
|
4,198 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
9,438 |
|
|
|
6,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
516,970 |
|
|
|
435,617 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
24,095 |
|
|
|
30,463 |
|
Investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
32,330 |
|
|
|
20,086 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
26,397 |
|
|
|
26,842 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
590,016 |
|
|
|
590,016 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
212,775 |
|
|
|
221,227 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
15,379 |
|
|
|
11,648 |
|
Risk corridor receivable from CMS |
|
|
21,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
17,592 |
|
|
|
8,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,457,393 |
|
|
$ |
1,344,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical claims liability |
|
$ |
221,459 |
|
|
$ |
190,144 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
25,800 |
|
|
|
35,050 |
|
Risk corridor payable to CMS |
|
|
2,656 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
28,724 |
|
|
|
32,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
278,639 |
|
|
|
258,890 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
85,406 |
|
|
|
89,615 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
222,611 |
|
|
|
235,736 |
|
Funds held for the benefit of members |
|
|
51,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
9,726 |
|
|
|
9,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
648,316 |
|
|
|
593,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 180,000,000 shares authorized,
58,106,776 shares issued and 54,911,801 outstanding at June 30,
2009, 57,811,927 shares issued and 54,619,488 outstanding at
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
509,579 |
|
|
|
504,367 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
347,673 |
|
|
|
295,170 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(1,423 |
) |
|
|
(1,955 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 3,194,975 shares at June 30, 2009 and
3,192,439 shares at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(47,333 |
) |
|
|
(47,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
809,077 |
|
|
|
750,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,457,393 |
|
|
$ |
1,344,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium revenue |
|
$ |
671,450 |
|
|
$ |
554,667 |
|
|
$ |
1,306,046 |
|
|
$ |
1,095,558 |
|
Management and other fees |
|
|
9,987 |
|
|
|
8,842 |
|
|
|
19,956 |
|
|
|
15,850 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
3,365 |
|
|
|
2,656 |
|
|
|
8,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
682,543 |
|
|
|
566,874 |
|
|
|
1,328,658 |
|
|
|
1,119,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical expense |
|
|
558,403 |
|
|
|
436,157 |
|
|
|
1,088,002 |
|
|
|
880,339 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
62,306 |
|
|
|
55,979 |
|
|
|
134,557 |
|
|
|
118,879 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,642 |
|
|
|
6,985 |
|
|
|
15,166 |
|
|
|
14,233 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,970 |
|
|
|
4,590 |
|
|
|
8,251 |
|
|
|
9,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
632,321 |
|
|
|
503,711 |
|
|
|
1,245,976 |
|
|
|
1,023,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
50,222 |
|
|
|
63,163 |
|
|
|
82,682 |
|
|
|
96,139 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(18,331 |
) |
|
|
(22,941 |
) |
|
|
(30,179 |
) |
|
|
(34,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
31,891 |
|
|
$ |
40,222 |
|
|
$ |
52,503 |
|
|
$ |
61,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
54,497,780 |
|
|
|
55,863,208 |
|
|
|
54,490,155 |
|
|
|
56,361,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
54,770,212 |
|
|
|
55,959,111 |
|
|
|
54,794,251 |
|
|
|
56,460,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
52,503 |
|
|
$ |
61,280 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,166 |
|
|
|
14,233 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
5,158 |
|
|
|
4,485 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing cost |
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
Deferred tax benefit |
|
|
(6,585 |
) |
|
|
(3,468 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in cash due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(75,159 |
) |
|
|
(122,813 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(2,734 |
) |
|
|
(446 |
) |
Medical claims liability |
|
|
31,315 |
|
|
|
41,504 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities |
|
|
(9,246 |
) |
|
|
15,837 |
|
Risk corridor payable to/receivable from CMS |
|
|
(20,602 |
) |
|
|
(17,930 |
) |
Other |
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
(995 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(8,430 |
) |
|
|
(7,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional consideration paid on acquisition |
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(5,502 |
) |
|
|
(3,838 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities |
|
|
(28,687 |
) |
|
|
(31,758 |
) |
Maturities of investment securities |
|
|
23,174 |
|
|
|
40,115 |
|
Purchases of restricted investments |
|
|
(10,123 |
) |
|
|
(4,510 |
) |
Maturities of restricted investments |
|
|
6,392 |
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
Distributions to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(15,656 |
) |
|
|
4,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds received for the benefit of the members |
|
|
325,004 |
|
|
|
249,014 |
|
Funds withdrawn for the benefit of members |
|
|
(271,476 |
) |
|
|
(219,838 |
) |
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(16,678 |
) |
|
|
(17,371 |
) |
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
36,856 |
|
|
|
(16,251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
12,770 |
|
|
|
(19,439 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
282,240 |
|
|
|
324,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
295,010 |
|
|
$ |
304,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
7,329 |
|
|
$ |
8,346 |
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
37,749 |
|
|
$ |
33,909 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
3
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) Organization and Basis of Presentation
HealthSpring, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), was organized in October 2004 and
began operations in March 2005 in connection with a recapitalization transaction accounted for as a
purchase. The Company is one of the countrys largest coordinated care plans whose primary focus is
on Medicare, the federal government sponsored health insurance program for United States citizens
aged 65 and older, qualifying disabled persons, and persons suffering from end-stage renal disease.
Through its health maintenance organization (HMO) and regulated insurance subsidiaries, the
Company operates Medicare Advantage health plans in the states of Alabama, Florida, Illinois,
Mississippi, Tennessee, and Texas and offers Medicare Part D prescription drug plans on a national basis. The Company also provides management services to health plans and physician
partnerships.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and should be read
in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of HealthSpring, Inc.
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) on February 25, 2009 (the 2008 Form 10-K).
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the Companys
financial position as of June 30, 2009, the Companys results of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Certain 2008 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Accordingly, certain information
and footnote disclosures normally included in complete financial statements prepared in accordance
with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations applicable to
interim financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (including normally recurring accruals)
necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position at June 30, 2009, and its results of
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and its cash flows for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
The results of operations for the 2009 interim period are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. Subsequent events
have been evaluated through August 4, 2009, the date of the issuance of the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements.
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements requires management of the
Company to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amount of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. The most
significant item subject to estimates and assumptions is the actuarial calculation for obligations
related to medical claims. Other significant items subject to estimates and assumptions include the
Companys estimated risk adjustment payments receivable from The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS), the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, the useful life of
definite-lived assets, the valuation of debt securities carried at fair value, and certain amounts
recorded related to the Part D program. Actual results could differ significantly from those
estimates. Illiquid credit markets and volatile equity markets, among other things, have increased the
uncertainty inherent in certain estimates and assumptions. As future events and their effects
cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these
estimates. Changes in estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will
be reflected in the financial statements in future periods.
The Companys HMO and regulated insurance subsidiaries are restricted from making
distributions without appropriate regulatory notifications and approvals or to the extent such
distributions would put them out of compliance with statutory net worth requirements or
requirements under the Companys credit facilities. At June 30, 2009, $337.0 million of the
Companys $394.7 million of cash, cash equivalents, investment securities and restricted
investments were held by the Companys HMO and regulated insurance subsidiaries and subject to
these dividend restrictions.
4
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(2) Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS
No. 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to GAAP requiring use of fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair
value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial assets and financial liabilities for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Issued in February 2008, FASB Staff Position
(FSP) 157-1 Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting
Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13 removed leasing transactions accounted for under Statement 13 and
related guidance from the scope of SFAS No. 157. FSP 157-2 Partial Deferral of the Effective Date
of Statement 157 (FSP 157-2), deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The
implementation of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities, effective January 1,
2008, did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results
of operations. The adoption of this statement for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
effective January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
No. 141(R)). SFAS No. 141(R) will significantly change the accounting for business combinations.
Under SFAS No. 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited
exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R) also includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS
No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008,
which is the year beginning January 1, 2009 for us. The adoption of this statement did not have a
material effect on the Companys financial statements. The provisions of SFAS No. 141(R) will only
impact the Company if it is party to a business combination that is consummated after January 1,
2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). This statement improves the
relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity
provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting
standards that require all entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries
as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Additionally, SFAS No. 160 requires that
entities provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests
of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 affects those entities
that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate
a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company adopted SFAS No. 160 effective January
1, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not impact the Companys financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entitys
derivative and hedging activities and is effective for the Company as of the first quarter of
fiscal 2009. The adoption of this statement as of January 1, 2009 required additional disclosures
related to renewal or extension assumptions, but did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets (FSP No. FAS 142-3), which amends the list of factors an entity should
consider in developing renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of
recognized intangible assets under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The new
guidance applies to (1) intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other
assets and (2) intangible assets acquired in both business combinations and asset acquisitions.
Under FSP No. FAS 142-3, companies estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset must
consider their historical experience in renewing or extending similar arrangements or, in the
absence of historical experience, must consider assumptions that market participants would use
about renewal or extension. For the Company, this FSP requires certain additional disclosures
beginning January 1, 2009 and application to useful life estimates prospectively for intangible
assets acquired after December 31, 2008. The adoption of this FSP did not have a material impact on
the Companys financial statements.
5
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1). FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 require
disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods as well as in
annual financial statements. The adoption of FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 as of the quarter ending June
30, 2009 required additional disclosures, but did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly, (FSP 157-4). FSP 157-4 provides additional guidance to
highlight and expand on the factors that should be considered in estimating fair value when there
has been a significant decrease in market activity for a financial asset. This FSP also requires
new disclosures relating to fair value measurement inputs and valuation techniques (including
changes in inputs and valuation techniques). The adoption of FSP 157-4, as of the quarter ending
June 30, 2009 did not impact the Companys financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP 115-2 and FAS 124-2). FSP 115-2 and FAS 124-2 amends
current other-than-temporary impairment guidance in GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance
more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments
on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This FSP does not amend existing
recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity
securities. The FSP applies to fixed maturity securities only and requires separate display of
losses related to credit deterioration and losses related to other market factors. The adoption of
FSP 115-2 and FAS 124-2, as of June 30, 2009 did not impact the Companys financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165). SFAS No.
165 establishes general standards for accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are available to be issued (subsequent
events). More specifically, SFAS No. 165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during
which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for
potential recognition in the financial statements, identifies the circumstances under which an
entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its
financial statements and the disclosures that should be made about events or transactions that
occur after the balance sheet date. See Note 1, Organization and Basis of Presentation for the
related disclosures. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 in the second quarter of 2009 did not impact the
Companys financial statements.
(3) Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Medicare premium receivables |
|
$ |
100,265 |
|
|
$ |
31,535 |
|
Rebates |
|
|
37,350 |
|
|
|
25,603 |
|
Due from providers |
|
|
13,468 |
|
|
|
17,409 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,004 |
|
|
|
1,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
153,087 |
|
|
$ |
76,418 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(3,530 |
) |
|
|
(2,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (including non-current receivables) |
|
$ |
149,557 |
|
|
$ |
74,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare premium receivables at June 30, 2009 include $94.0 million for receivables from CMS
related to the accrual of retroactive risk adjustment payments (including $9.8 million which will
not be paid until the second half of 2010 and which is classified as non-current and included in
other assets on the Companys balance sheet). Subsequent to June 30, 2009, the Company received
retroactive risk payments from CMS of $88.2 million, consisting of the Initial
CMS Settlement (as defined below) for
the 2009 plan year and Final CMS Settlement (as defined below) amounts for the 2008 plan year.
The Companys Medicare premium revenue is subject to adjustment based on the health risk of
its members. This process for adjusting premiums is referred to as the CMS risk adjustment payment
methodology. Under the risk adjustment payment
6
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
methodology, coordinated care plans must capture, collect, and report diagnosis code
information to CMS. After reviewing the respective submissions, CMS establishes the payments to
Medicare plans generally at the beginning of the calendar year, and then adjusts premiums on two
separate occasions on a retroactive basis.
The first retroactive risk premium adjustment for a given fiscal year generally occurs during
the third quarter of such fiscal year. This initial settlement (the Initial CMS Settlement)
represents the updating of risk scores for the current year based on updated diagnoses from the
prior year. CMS then issues a final retroactive risk premium adjustment settlement for that fiscal
year in the following year (the Final CMS Settlement).
All such estimated amounts are periodically updated as additional diagnosis code information
is reported to CMS and are adjusted to actual amounts when the ultimate settlements are known to
the Company.
During the 2009 second quarter, the Company updated its estimated Final CMS Settlement payment
amounts for 2008 as a result of receiving notification in July 2009 from CMS of Final CMS
Settlements for 2008. The change in estimate related to the 2008 plan year resulted in an
additional $7.9 million of premium revenue in the second quarter of 2009. The impact of the change
in estimate during 2009 relating to the 2008 plan year on net income, after the expense for risk
sharing with providers and income tax expense, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
was $2.6 million and $2.1 million, respectively. Similarly, the impact of the change in estimate
related to the 2007 plan year resulted in an additional $17.3 million and $29.3 million of premium
revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. The resulting impact of
such changes on net income, after the expense for risk sharing with providers and income tax
expense, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, was $8.1 million and $13.4 million,
respectively.
Rebates for drug costs represent estimated rebates owed to the Company from prescription drug
companies. The Company has entered into contracts with certain drug manufacturers which provide for
rebates to the Company based on the utilization of specific prescription drugs by the Companys
members. Accounts receivable relating to unpaid health plan enrollee premiums are recorded during
the period the Company is obligated to provide services to enrollees and do not bear interest. The
Company does not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to its health plan enrollees.
Due from providers primarily includes management fees receivable as well as amounts owed to the
Company for the refund of certain medical expenses paid by the Company under risk sharing
agreements.
(4) Investment Securities
There were no investment securities classified as trading as of June 30, 2009 or December 31,
2008.
Investment securities available for sale classified as current assets are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
3,021 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
$ |
3,195 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Investment securities available for sale classified as non-current assets are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
21,151 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
21,457 |
|
|
$ |
24,874 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
24,930 |
|
Corporate debt
securities |
|
|
2,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,638 |
|
|
|
5,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,789 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
24,095 |
|
|
$ |
30,407 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
30,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity classified as current assets are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
$ |
2,632 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,637 |
|
|
$ |
3,649 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,671 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
1,786 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,804 |
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,745 |
|
Government agencies |
|
|
11,077 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,139 |
|
|
|
10,761 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,895 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
9,317 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
9,390 |
|
|
|
8,602 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
8,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,812 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
24,970 |
|
|
$ |
24,750 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
24,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity classified as non-current assets are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
19,269 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
19,331 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
7,526 |
|
Government agencies |
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
|
|
3,081 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,324 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
9,665 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
9,864 |
|
|
|
9,505 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
9,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,330 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
32,607 |
|
|
$ |
20,086 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
20,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no realized gains or losses on maturities of investment securities for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Maturities of investments are as follows at June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
3,021 |
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
$ |
24,812 |
|
|
|
24,970 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
11,298 |
|
|
|
11,637 |
|
|
|
26,394 |
|
|
|
26,686 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
5,936 |
|
|
|
5,921 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
11,011 |
|
|
|
10,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,810 |
|
|
|
27,144 |
|
|
$ |
57,142 |
|
|
|
57,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Maturities of investments are as follows at December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
3,195 |
|
|
|
3,259 |
|
|
$ |
24,750 |
|
|
|
24,902 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
11,618 |
|
|
|
11,847 |
|
|
|
17,508 |
|
|
|
17,812 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
5,048 |
|
|
|
5,043 |
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
|
1,511 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
13,741 |
|
|
|
13,573 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,602 |
|
|
|
33,722 |
|
|
$ |
44,836 |
|
|
|
45,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized losses on investment securities and the fair value of the related
securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have
been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2009, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
|
7,514 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
8,510 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
|
9,808 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
11,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company reviews fixed maturities and equity
securities with a decline in fair value from cost for impairment based on criteria that include
duration and severity of decline; financial viability and outlook of the issuer; and changes in the
regulatory, economic and market environment of the issuers industry or geographic region.
Gross unrealized losses on investment securities and the fair value of the related
securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have
been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2008, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
|
5,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
5,894 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
10,959 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
11,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
|
16,853 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
17,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Bonds and Government Agencies: The unrealized gains/losses on investments in
municipal bonds were caused by an increase in investment yields as a result of a widening of credit
spreads. The contractual terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the
securities at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. For periods prior to April 1, 2009, the Company determined that it had
the ability and intent to hold these investments until recovery, thus these
investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired. For periods beginning on or after April 1, 2009, the Company determined that it did
not intend to sell these investments and that it was not more-likely-than-not that it would be required to sell these investments prior to their recovery,
thus these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.
9
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Corporate Debt Securities: The unrealized losses on corporate debt securities were caused by
an increase in investment yields as a result of a widening of credit spreads. The contractual terms
of the bonds do not allow the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the face value
of the bonds. For periods prior to April 1, 2009, the Company determined that it had
the ability and intent to hold these investments until recovery, thus these
investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired. For periods beginning on or after April 1, 2009, the Company determined that it did
not intend to sell these investments and that it was not
more-likely-than-not that it would be required to sell these investments prior to their recovery,
thus these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.
(5) Fair Value Measurements
The Companys 2009 second quarter condensed consolidated balance sheet includes the following
financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, investment securities,
restricted investments, accounts payable, medical claims liabilities, interest rate swap
agreements, funds due (held) from CMS for the benefit of members, and long-term debt. The carrying
amounts of accounts receivable, funds due (held) from CMS for the benefit of members, accounts
payable, and medical claims liabilities approximate their fair value because of the relatively short
period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization. The
fair value of the Companys long-term debt (including the current portion) was $237.5 million at
June 30, 2009 and consisted solely of non-tradable bank debt.
Cash and cash equivalents consist of such items as certificates of deposit, commercial paper,
and money market funds. The original cost of these assets approximates fair value due to their
short-term maturity. The fair value of the Companys interest rate swap agreements are derived from
a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the interest rate curve. In
addition, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its
own non-performance or credit risk and the counterparties non-performance or credit risk in the
fair value measurements. Credit risk under these swap arrangements is believed to be remote as the
counterparties to our interest rate swap agreements are major financial institutions and the
Company does not anticipate non-performance by the counterparties. The Company has designated its
interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges which are recorded in the Companys consolidated balance
sheet at fair value. The fair value of the Companys interest rate swaps at June 30, 2009 reflected
a liability of approximately $2.7 million and is included in other long term liabilities in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The fair values available for sale securities is
determined by pricing models developed using market data provided by a third party vendor.
The following are the levels of the hierarchy as defined by SFAS No. 157 and a brief
description of the type of valuation information (inputs) that qualifies a financial asset for
each level:
|
|
|
Level Input |
|
Input Definition |
Level I
|
|
Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets
at the measurement date. |
|
|
|
Level II
|
|
Inputs other than quoted prices included in
Level I that are observable for the asset or
liability through corroboration with market data
at the measurement date. |
|
|
|
Level III
|
|
Unobservable inputs that reflect
managements best estimate of what market
participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability at the measurement date. |
When quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are available, the Company uses
these quoted market prices to determine the fair value of financial assets and classifies these
assets as Level I. In other cases where a quoted market price for identical assets in an active
market is either not available or not observable, the Company obtains the fair value from a third
party vendor that uses pricing models, such as matrix pricing, to determine fair value. These
financial assets would then be classified as Level II. In the event quoted market prices were not
available, the Company would determine fair value using broker quotes or an internal analysis of
each investments financial statements and cash flow projections. In these instances, financial
assets would be classified based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the
valuation. Thus, financial assets might be classified in Level III even though there could be some
significant inputs that may be readily available.
10
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at June 30, 2009 for assets
and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
295,010 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
295,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities, available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,506 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities,
available for sale: |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,144 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,667 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) Medical Liabilities
The Companys medical liabilities at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Medicare medical liabilities |
|
$ |
160,879 |
|
|
$ |
126,762 |
|
Pharmacy liabilities |
|
|
60,580 |
|
|
|
63,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
221,459 |
|
|
$ |
190,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) Medicare Part D
Total Part D related net assets (excluding medical claims payable) of $38,793 at December 31,
2008 all relate to the 2008 CMS plan year. The Companys Part D related assets and liabilities
(excluding medical claims payable) at June 30, 2009 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to the |
|
|
Related to the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 plan year |
|
|
2009 plan year |
|
|
Total |
|
Current assets (liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds due for the benefit of members |
|
$ |
38,617 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
38,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk corridor payable to CMS |
|
$ |
(2,656 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets (liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk corridor receivable from CMS |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,839 |
|
|
$ |
21,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds held for the benefit of members |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(51,934 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,934 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances associated with risk corridor amounts are expected to be settled in the second half
of the year following the year to which they relate. Current year Part D amounts are routinely
updated in subsequent periods as a result of retroactivity.
(8) Derivatives
In October 2008, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements relating to the
floating interest rate component of the term loan agreement under its $400.0 million, five year
credit facility (collectively, the Credit Agreement). The total notional amount covered by the
agreements is $100.0 million of the currently $251.3 million outstanding under the term loan
agreement. Under the swap agreements, the Company is required to pay a fixed interest rate of 2.96%
and is entitled to receive LIBOR every month until
11
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
October 31, 2010. The actual interest rate payable under the Credit Agreement in each case
contains an applicable margin, which is not affected by the swap agreements. The interest rate swap
agreements are classified as cash flow hedges, as defined by SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. See Note 5 for a discussion of fair value
accounting related to the swap agreements.
The Company entered into the two interest rate swap derivatives to convert floating-rate debt
to fixed-rate debt. The Companys interest rate swap agreements involve agreements to pay a fixed
rate and receive a floating rate, at specified intervals, calculated on an agreed-upon notional
amount. The Companys objective in entering into these financial instruments is to mitigate its
exposure to significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings caused by volatility in interest rates.
The Company does not use any of these instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Derivative instruments used by the Company involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit
risk, in the event a counterparty should default, and market risk, as the instruments are subject
to interest rate fluctuations.
All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. To date, the two
derivatives entered into by the Company qualify for and are designated as cash flow hedges. To the
extent that the cash flow hedges are effective, changes in their fair value are recorded in other
comprehensive income (loss) until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows of the
hedged transaction (e.g. until periodic settlements of a variable asset or liability are recorded
in earnings). Any hedge ineffectiveness (which represents the amount by which the changes in the
fair value of the derivatives differ from changes in the fair value of the hedged instrument) is
recorded in current-period earnings. Also, on a quarterly basis, the Company measures hedge
effectiveness by completing a regression analysis comparing the present value of the cumulative
change in the expected future interest to be received on the variable leg of its swap against the
present value of the cumulative change in the expected future interest payments on its variable
rate debt.
A summary of the aggregate notional amounts, balance sheet location and estimated fair values
of derivative financial instruments at June 30, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
Hedging instruments |
|
Amount |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the effect of cash flow hedges on our financial statements is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statement |
|
|
Reclassified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax Hedge Gain |
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
from |
|
|
Ineffective Portion |
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Income Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Other |
|
|
from Accumulated |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Other Comprehensive |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Hedge Gain (Loss) |
|
Type of Cash Flow Hedge |
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
Recognized |
|
For the three
months ended June 30,
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
None |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months
ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
588 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
None |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(9) Stock-Based Compensation
Stock Options
The Company granted options to purchase 440,528 shares of common stock pursuant to the 2006
Equity Incentive Plan during the six months ended June 30, 2009. Options for the purchase of
4,044,790 shares of common stock were outstanding under this plan at June 30, 2009. The outstanding
options vest and become exercisable based on time, generally over a four-year period, and expire
ten years from their grant dates. Upon exercise, options are settled with authorized but unissued
Company common stock or treasury shares.
There were no options granted during the three month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
The fair value for all options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was
determined on the date of grant and was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with
the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
43.6 |
% |
|
|
36.2 |
% |
Expected term |
|
5 |
years |
|
5 |
years |
Risk-free interest rates |
|
|
1.88 |
% |
|
|
2.93 |
% |
The weighted average fair values of stock options granted during the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 were $6.12 and $7.13, respectively. The cash proceeds to the Company from stock
options exercised during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 were immaterial.
Total compensation expense related to unvested options not yet recognized was $12.1 million at
June 30, 2009. The Company expects to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average
period of 2.2 years.
Restricted Stock
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company granted -0- and 233,091
shares, respectively, of restricted stock to employees pursuant to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan,
the restrictions of which lapse 50%, 25%, and 25% on the second, third, and fourth anniversaries,
respectively, of the grant date. Additionally, in the first quarter of 2009, 67,809 shares were
purchased by certain executives pursuant to the Management Stock Purchase Program (the MSPP).
The restrictions on shares purchased under the MSPP lapse on the second anniversary of the
acquisition date.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company awarded 60,516 shares of restricted
stock to non-employee directors pursuant to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, all of which were
outstanding at June 30, 2009. The restrictions relating to the restricted stock awarded in the
current period lapse one year from the grant date. In the event a director resigns or is removed
prior to the lapsing of the restriction, or if the director fails to attend 75% of the board and
applicable committee meetings during the one-year period, shares would be forfeited unless
resignation or failure to attend is caused by disability.
Total compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized,
including awards made in previous periods, was $4.1 million at June 30, 2009. The Company expects
to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 2.8 years.
Unvested restricted stock at June 30, 2009 totaled 453,340 shares.
13
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Stock-based Compensation
Stock-based compensation is included in selling, general and administrative expense.
Stock-based compensation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Compensation Expense Related To: |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
Expense |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
387 |
|
|
$ |
1,867 |
|
|
$ |
2,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
4,143 |
|
|
|
5,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
3,782 |
|
|
|
4,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10) Net Income Per Common Share
The following table presents the calculation of the Companys net income per common share
basic and diluted (in thousands, except share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
31,891 |
|
|
$ |
40,222 |
|
|
$ |
52,503 |
|
|
$ |
61,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
basic |
|
|
54,497,780 |
|
|
|
55,863,208 |
|
|
|
54,490,155 |
|
|
|
56,361,007 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
71,278 |
|
|
|
80,498 |
|
|
|
74,652 |
|
|
|
83,931 |
|
Dilutive effect of unvested restricted shares |
|
|
201,154 |
|
|
|
15,405 |
|
|
|
229,444 |
|
|
|
15,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
diluted |
|
|
54,770,212 |
|
|
|
55,959,111 |
|
|
|
54,794,251 |
|
|
|
56,460,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share (EPS) reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
stock options or other share-based awards were exercised or converted into common stock. The
dilutive effect is computed using the treasury stock method, which assumes all share-based awards
are exercised and the hypothetical proceeds from exercise are used by the Company to purchase
common stock at the average market price during the period. The incremental shares (difference
between shares assumed to be issued versus purchased), to the extent they would have been dilutive,
are included in the denominator of the diluted EPS calculation. Options with respect to 4.1
million shares and 3.6 million shares were antidilutive and therefore excluded from the computation
of diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
In June 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to buy
back up to $50.0 million of the Companys common stock over the subsequent 12 months. In May 2008,
the Companys Board of Directors extended this program to June 30, 2009. On June 30, 2009 the
repurchase program expired in accordance with its terms. Over the life of the repurchase program,
the Company repurchased approximately 2.8 million shares of its common stock for approximately
$47.3 million, at an average cost of $16.65 per share.
14
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(11) Intangible Assets
A breakdown of the identifiable intangible assets and their assigned value and accumulated
amortization at June 30, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Trade name |
|
$ |
24,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,500 |
|
Noncompete agreements |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Provider network |
|
|
137,619 |
|
|
|
17,327 |
|
|
|
120,292 |
|
Medicare member network |
|
|
93,588 |
|
|
|
26,851 |
|
|
|
66,737 |
|
Management contract right |
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
258,061 |
|
|
$ |
45,286 |
|
|
$ |
212,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense on identifiable intangible assets for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 was approximately $4.6 million and $4.7 million, respectively. Amortization expense
on identifiable intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately
$9.2 million and $9.8 million, respectively.
(12) Comprehensive Income
The following table presents details supporting the determination of comprehensive income for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
31,891 |
|
|
$ |
40,222 |
|
|
$ |
52,503 |
|
|
$ |
61,280 |
|
Net unrealized (loss) gain on available
for sale investment securities, net of tax |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Net gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
$ |
32,135 |
|
|
$ |
40,084 |
|
|
$ |
53,035 |
|
|
$ |
61,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13) Segment Information
The Company reports its business in four segments: Medicare Advantage, stand-alone
Prescription Drug Plan, Commercial, and Corporate. Medicare Advantage (MA-PD) consists of
Medicare-eligible beneficiaries receiving healthcare benefits, including prescription drugs,
through a coordinated care plan qualifying under Part C and Part D of the Medicare Program.
Stand-alone Prescription Drug Plan (PDP) consists of Medicare-eligible beneficiaries receiving
prescription drug benefits on a stand-alone basis in accordance with Medicare Part D. Commercial
consists of the Companys commercial health plan business. The Commercial segment was insignificant
as of June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008. The Corporate segment consists primarily of corporate
expenses not allocated to the other reportable segments. The Company identifies its segments in
accordance with the aggregation provisions of SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, which aggregates products with similar economic
characteristics. These characteristics include the nature of customer groups as well as pricing and
benefits. These segment groupings are also consistent with information used by the Companys chief
executive officer in making operating decisions.
The accounting policies of each segment are the same and are described in Note 1 to the 2008
Form 10-K. The results of each segment are measured and evaluated by earnings before interest
expense, depreciation and amortization expense, and income taxes (EBITDA). The Company does not
allocate certain corporate overhead amounts (classified as selling, general and administrative
expenses) or interest expense to the segments. The Company evaluates interest expense, income
taxes, and asset and liability details
15
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
on a consolidated basis as these items are managed in a corporate shared service environment
and are not the responsibility of segment operating management.
Revenue includes premium revenue, management and other fee income, and investment income.
Asset and equity details by reportable segment have not been disclosed, as the Company does
not internally report such information.
Financial data by reportable segment for the three and six months ended June 30 is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MA-PD |
|
PDP |
|
Commercial |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
Three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
594,255 |
|
|
$ |
87,496 |
|
|
$ |
779 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
682,543 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
62,797 |
|
|
|
5,788 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(6,757 |
) |
|
|
61,834 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
6,366 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
7,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
494,179 |
|
|
$ |
71,574 |
|
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
566,874 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
82,757 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
(918 |
) |
|
|
(7,714 |
) |
|
|
74,738 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
5,961 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
6,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,147,004 |
|
|
$ |
180,114 |
|
|
$ |
1,515 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
1,328,658 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
111,882 |
|
|
|
7,913 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(13,688 |
) |
|
|
106,099 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
12,722 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
15,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
963,984 |
|
|
$ |
152,006 |
|
|
$ |
3,386 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
1,119,583 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
133,281 |
|
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
|
(604 |
) |
|
|
(13,857 |
) |
|
|
120,365 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
14,233 |
|
As of January 1, 2009, the Company revised its methodology for allocating the selling,
general, and administrative expenses, but only within its prescription drug operations, which
resulted in its allocating a greater share of such expenses to its MA-PD segment. As such, the MA-PD and PDP segment EBITDA amounts for the 2008 period include
reclassification adjustments between segments such that the periods presented are comparable.
A reconciliation of reportable segment EBITDA to net income included in the consolidated
statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
61,834 |
|
|
$ |
74,738 |
|
|
$ |
106,099 |
|
|
$ |
120,365 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(18,331 |
) |
|
|
(22,941 |
) |
|
|
(30,179 |
) |
|
|
(34,859 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,970 |
) |
|
|
(4,590 |
) |
|
|
(8,251 |
) |
|
|
(9,993 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(7,642 |
) |
|
|
(6,985 |
) |
|
|
(15,166 |
) |
|
|
(14,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
31,891 |
|
|
$ |
40,222 |
|
|
$ |
52,503 |
|
|
$ |
61,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company uses segment EBITDA as an analytical indicator for purposes of assessing segment
performance, as is common in the healthcare industry. Segment EBITDA should not be considered as a
measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles and segment EBITDA,
as presented, may not be comparable to other companies.
16
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(14) Related Parties
Renaissance Physician Organization (RPO) is a Texas non-profit corporation the members of
which are GulfQuest L.P., one of the Companys wholly owned HMO management subsidiaries, and 14
affiliated independent physician associations, comprised of over 1,000 physicians providing medical
services primarily in and around counties surrounding and including the Houston, Texas metropolitan
area. Texas HealthSpring, LLC, the Companys Texas HMO, has contracted with RPO to provide
professional medical and covered medical services and procedures to its members. Pursuant to that
agreement, RPO shares risk relating to the provision of such services, both upside and downside,
with the Company on a 50%/50% allocation. Another agreement the Company has with RPO delegates
responsibility to GulfQuest L.P. for medical management, claims processing, provider relations,
credentialing, finance, and reporting services for RPOs Medicare and commercial members. Pursuant
to that agreement, GulfQuest L.P. receives a management fee, calculated as a percentage of Medicare
premiums, plus a dollar amount per member per month for RPOs commercial members. In addition, RPO
pays GulfQuest, L.P. 25% of the profits from RPOs operations.
FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities an interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN46R), requires an entity to consolidate a
variable interest entity (VIE) if that entity holds a variable interest that will absorb a
majority of the VIEs expected losses, receive a majority of the VIEs expected residual returns,
or both. The entity required to consolidate a VIE is known as the primary beneficiary. The Company
has evaluated its interests in RPO and concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of RPO, and
as such is not required to consolidate RPO. The Company does not carry any investment in RPO on its
balance sheet but does record management and other fees as well as medical expenses (under the
contractual provisions discussed above) in its results from operations. Under FIN46R, VIEs are
reassessed for consolidation when reconsideration events occur. Reconsideration events include
changes to the VIEs governing documents that reallocate the expected losses/returns of the VIE
between the primary beneficiary and other variable interest holders or sales and purchases of
variable interests in the VIE.
17
|
|
|
Item 2: |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our condensed
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report and our
audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31,
2008, appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K that was filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on February 25, 2009 (the 2008 Form 10-K). Statements contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical fact are forward-looking statements that the
company intends to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements
contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are predictive
in nature, that depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as
anticipates, believes, could, estimates, expects, intends, may, plans, potential,
predicts, projects, should, will, would, and similar expressions are forward-looking
statements.
The company cautions that forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to
be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied
by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with
respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. Given
these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
In evaluating any forward-looking statement, you should specifically consider the information
set forth under the captions Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Item 1A. Risk
Factors in the 2008 Form 10-K and the information set forth under Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements in our earnings and other press releases, as well as other cautionary
statements contained elsewhere in this report, including the matters discussed in Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates and Item 1A. Risk Factors. We undertake no obligation beyond
that required by law to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new
information becomes available or other events occur in the future. You should read this report and
the documents that we reference in this report and have filed as exhibits to this report completely
and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we
expect.
Overview
General
HealthSpring, Inc. (the company or HealthSpring) is one of the countrys largest
coordinated care plans whose primary focus is Medicare, the federal government-sponsored health
insurance program for U.S. citizens aged 65 and older, qualifying disabled persons, and persons
suffering from end-stage renal disease.
We operate Medicare Advantage plans in Alabama, Florida, Illinois, Mississippi, Tennessee, and
Texas and offer Medicare Part D prescription drug plans on a national basis. We sometimes
refer to our Medicare Advantage plans, including plans providing prescription drug benefits, or
MA-PD, collectively as Medicare Advantage plans and our stand-alone prescription drug plan as
our PDP. For purposes of additional analysis, the company provides membership and certain
financial information, including premium revenue and medical expense, for our Medicare Advantage
(including MA-PD) and PDP plans.
We disclose our results by reportable segment in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information. We report our business in four segments: Medicare Advantage, PDP,
Commercial, and Corporate. The following discussion of our results of operations includes a
discussion of revenue and certain expenses by reportable segment. See Segment Information below
for additional information related thereto.
18
Results of Operations
The consolidated results of operations include the accounts of HealthSpring and its
subsidiaries. The following tables set forth the consolidated statements of income data expressed
in dollars (in thousands) and as a percentage of total revenue for each period indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium revenue |
|
$ |
671,450 |
|
|
|
98.4 |
% |
|
$ |
554,667 |
|
|
|
97.8 |
% |
Management and other fees |
|
|
9,987 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
8,842 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3,365 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
682,543 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
566,874 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical expense |
|
|
558,403 |
|
|
|
81.8 |
|
|
|
436,157 |
|
|
|
77.0 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
62,306 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
55,979 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,642 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
6,985 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,970 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4,590 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
632,321 |
|
|
|
92.6 |
|
|
|
503,711 |
|
|
|
88.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
50,222 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
63,163 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(18,331 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(22,941 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
31,891 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
$ |
40,222 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium revenue |
|
$ |
1,306,046 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
% |
|
$ |
1,095,558 |
|
|
|
97.9 |
% |
Management and other fees |
|
|
19,956 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
15,850 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
2,656 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
8,175 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
1,328,658 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
1,119,583 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical expense |
|
|
1,088,002 |
|
|
|
81.9 |
|
|
|
880,339 |
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
134,557 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
118,879 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,166 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
14,233 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
8,251 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
9,993 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
1,245,976 |
|
|
|
93.8 |
|
|
|
1,023,444 |
|
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
82,682 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
96,139 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(30,179 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(34,859 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
52,503 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
$ |
61,280 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Membership
Our primary source of revenue is monthly premium payments we receive based on membership
enrolled in Medicare. The following table summarizes our Medicare Advantage
(including MA-PD) and PDP membership as of the dates specified:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
Medicare Advantage Membership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
|
|
55,917 |
|
|
|
49,933 |
|
|
|
49,063 |
|
Texas |
|
|
50,348 |
|
|
|
43,889 |
|
|
|
39,142 |
|
Florida |
|
|
30,892 |
|
|
|
27,568 |
|
|
|
27,017 |
|
Alabama |
|
|
30,101 |
|
|
|
29,022 |
|
|
|
28,141 |
|
Illinois |
|
|
10,821 |
|
|
|
9,245 |
|
|
|
8,796 |
|
Mississippi |
|
|
4,152 |
|
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
182,231 |
|
|
|
162,082 |
|
|
|
153,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare PDP Membership |
|
|
294,753 |
|
|
|
282,429 |
|
|
|
265,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare Advantage. Our Medicare Advantage membership increased by 18.4% to 182,231 members
at June 30, 2009, as compared to 153,958 members at June 30, 2008, with membership gains in all our
health plans. Our Medicare Advantage net membership gain of 20,149 during the first half of 2009
reflects both focused sales and marketing efforts through the annual open enrollment and election
periods and better retention rates resulting from, we believe, the relative attractiveness of our
various plans benefits. We currently anticipate small but incremental membership growth
throughout the remainder of 2009 in our Medicare Advantage membership through the offering of
products to beneficiaries whose enrollment is not restricted by lock-in rules, including age-ins,
dual-eligibles, and beneficiaries eligible for one of our special needs plans (SNPs).
PDP. PDP membership increased by 11.0% to 294,753 members at June 30, 2009 as compared to
265,435 at June 30, 2008, primarily as a result of the auto-assignment of members at the beginning
of the year, despite reducing the CMS regions in which we receive auto-assignments from 31 in 2008
to 24 in 2009. We do not actively market our PDPs and have relied on CMS auto-assignments of
dual-eligible beneficiaries for membership. We have continued to receive assignments or otherwise
enroll dual-eligible beneficiaries in our PDP plans during lock-in and expect incremental growth
for the balance of the year.
Risk Adjustment Payments
The companys Medicare premium revenue is subject to adjustment based on the health risk of
its members. This process for adjusting premiums is referred to as the CMS risk adjustment payment
methodology. Under the risk adjustment payment methodology, coordinated care plans must capture,
collect, and report diagnosis code information to CMS. After reviewing the respective submissions,
CMS establishes the payments to Medicare plans generally at the beginning of the calendar year, and
then adjusts premiums on two separate occasions on a retroactive basis.
The first retroactive risk premium adjustment for a given fiscal year generally occurs during
the third quarter of such fiscal year. This initial settlement (the Initial CMS Settlement)
represents the updating of risk scores for the current year based on updated diagnoses from the
prior year. CMS then issues a final retroactive risk premium adjustment settlement for that fiscal
year in the following year (the Final CMS Settlement).
During the 2009 second quarter, the Company updated its estimated Final CMS Settlement payment
amounts for 2008 as a result of receiving notification from CMS in July 2009 of Final CMS
Settlement amounts for 2008. The change in estimate related to the 2008 plan year resulted in an
additional $7.9 million of premium revenue in the second quarter of 2009. The impact to net income of the change
in estimate during 2009 relating to the 2008 plan year, after the expense for risk
sharing with providers and income tax expense, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
was $2.6 million and $2.1 million, respectively. Similarly, the change in estimate related to the
2007 plan year resulted in an additional $17.3 million and $29.3 million of premium revenue for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. The resulting impact of such changes on
net income, after the expense for risk sharing
20
with providers and income tax expense, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, was
$8.1 million and $13.4 million, respectively.
Total Final CMS Settlement for the 2008 plan year was $31.8 million and represented 1.8% of
total Medicare Advantage premiums, as adjusted for risk payments, for the 2008 plan year. Total
Final CMS Settlement for the 2007 plan year was $57.9 million and represented 4.4% of total
Medicare Advantage premiums, as adjusted for risk payments, received for the 2007 plan year.
Comparison of the Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2009 to the Three-Month Period Ended June 30,
2008
Revenue
Total revenue was $682.5 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 as compared
with $566.9 million for the same period in 2008, representing an increase of $115.6 million, or
20.4%. The components of revenue were as follows:
Premium Revenue: Total premium revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $671.5
million as compared with $554.7 million in the same period in 2008, representing an increase of
$116.8 million, or 21.1%. The components of premium revenue and the primary reasons for changes
were as follows:
Medicare Advantage: Medicare Advantage (including MA-PD) premiums were $583.2 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $482.9 million in the second quarter of
2008, representing an increase of $100.3 million, or 20.8%. The increase in Medicare
Advantage premiums in 2009 is primarily attributable to increases in membership and in per
member per month, or PMPM, premium rates in substantially all of our plans. In addition,
the 2009 and 2008 second quarter results include $7.9 million and $17.3 million,
respectively, of additional Medicare Advantage premium revenue for final retroactive premium
settlements as a result of our adjusting estimated amounts to actual amounts (See Risk
Adjustment Payments above). PMPM premiums for the 2009 second quarter averaged $1,060.11,
which reflects an increase of 4.9% as compared to the 2008 second quarter, as adjusted to
exclude retroactive risk adjustments associated with prior years. The PMPM premium increase in the current quarter is the result
of rate increases in CMS-calculated base rates as well as rate increases related to risk
scores.
PDP: PDP premiums (after risk corridor adjustments) were $87.4 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to $70.7 million in the same period of 2008, an increase of
$16.7 million, or 23.6%. The increase in premiums for the 2009 second quarter is primarily
the result of increases in membership and PDP PMPM premium rates. Our average PMPM premiums
(after risk corridor adjustments) increased 11.2% to $99.99 in the 2009 second quarter, as
compared to $89.89 during the 2008 second quarter.
Fee Revenue. Fee revenue was $10.0 million in the second quarter of 2009 compared to $8.8
million for the second quarter of 2008, an increase of $1.2 million. The increase in the current
period is attributable to increased management fees as a result of new independent physician
associations (IPAs) under contract since the 2008 second quarter and higher membership in managed
IPAs compared to the same period last year.
Investment Income. Investment income was $1.1 million for the second quarter of 2009 as
compared to $3.4 million for the comparable period of 2008, reflecting a decrease of $2.3 million,
or 67.1%. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in the average yield on invested
and cash balances.
21
Medical Expense
Medicare Advantage. Medicare Advantage (including MA-PD) medical expense for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 increased $111.9 million, or 30.6%, to $478.0 million from $366.1 million for
the comparable period of 2008, which is primarily attributable to increases in PMPM medical expense
and membership increases in the 2009 period as compared to the 2008 period. For the three months
ended June 30, 2009, the Medicare Advantage medical loss ratio, or MLR, was 82.4% versus 77.7%
for the same period of 2008, as adjusted to exclude final CMS settlement adjustments associated
with prior years. (See Risk Adjustment Payments above.) The deterioration in the MLR for the
current period was primarily attributable to increased inpatient procedure costs in our Tennessee
health plan and increases in physician expenses in our Alabama, Tennessee, and Texas health plans.
The deterioration was partially offset by improvements in our Florida plans MLR attributable
primarily to hospital recontracting efforts.
Our Medicare Advantage medical expense calculated on a PMPM basis was $873.64 for the three
months ended June 30, 2009, compared with $784.94 for the comparable 2008 quarter, as adjusted to
exclude final CMS settlement adjustments associated with prior years.
PDP. PDP medical expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 increased $11.5 million to
$79.6 million, compared to $68.1 million in the same period last year. PDP MLR for the 2009 second
quarter was 91.1%, compared to 96.3% in the 2008 second quarter. The decrease in PDP MLR for the
current quarter was primarily attributable to higher PDP revenue.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expense
Selling, general, and administrative expense, or SG&A, for the three months ended June 30,
2009 was $62.3 million as compared with $56.0 million for the same prior year period, an increase
of $6.3 million, or 11.3%. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expense decreased approximately 80
basis points for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the prior year second quarter.
The decrease in SG&A as a percentage of revenue in the current quarter was primarily the result of
improved operating leverage, with increases in membership and revenue exceeding increased administrative costs. The $6.3 million increase in the 2009 second quarter as compared to
the same period of the prior year is the result of personnel cost increases, primarily related to
growth in headcount associated with the management of membership increases.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense was $7.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2009
as compared with $7.0 million in the same period of 2008, representing an increase of $0.6 million.
The increase in the current quarter was the result of incremental amortization expense associated
with intangible assets recorded as part of the acquisition in October 2008 by our Texas plan of
certain Medicare Advantage contracts from Valley Baptist Health Plans operating in the Rio Grande
Valley and incremental depreciation on property and equipment additions made in 2008 and 2009.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $4.0 million in the 2009 second quarter compared with $4.6 million in
the 2008 second quarter. The decrease in the current quarter was the result of lower effective
interest rates and lower average principal balances outstanding. The weighted average interest
rate incurred on our borrowings during the three month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was
6.1% and 6.3%, respectively (4.9% and 5.2%, respectively, exclusive of amortization of deferred
financing costs).
Income Tax Expense
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, income tax expense was $18.3 million, reflecting an
effective tax rate of 36.5%, as compared to $22.9 million, reflecting an effective tax rate of
36.3%, for the same period of 2008. The higher rate in 2009 is primarily attributable to the
estimated annual decrease in non-taxable investment income. The Company currently expects the effective tax
rate for the full 2009 year will approximate 36.5%.
22
Comparison of the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2009 to the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2008
Revenue
Total revenue was $1,328.7 million in the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 as compared
with $1,119.6 million for the same period in 2008, representing an increase of $209.1 million, or
18.7%. The components of revenue were as follows:
Premium Revenue: Total premium revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $1,306.0
million as compared with $1,095.6 million in the same period in 2008, representing an increase of
$210.5 million, or 19.2%. The components of premium revenue and the primary reasons for changes
were as follows:
Medicare Advantage: Medicare Advantage (including MA-PD) premiums were $1,124.6 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $942.2 million in the same period of 2008,
representing an increase of $182.4 million, or 19.4%. The increase in Medicare Advantage
premiums in 2009 is primarily attributable to increases in membership and in PMPM premium
rates in all of our plans. In addition, the 2009 and 2008 six month period results include
$6.5 million and $29.3 million, respectively, of additional Medicare Advantage premium
revenue for final retroactive premium settlements as a result of the company adjusting
estimated amounts to actual amounts (See Risk Adjustment Payments above). PMPM premiums
for the current six month period averaged $1,055.13, which reflects an increase of 6.0% as
compared to the 2008 comparable period, as adjusted to exclude retroactive risk adjustments
associated with prior years. The PMPM premium
increase in the current period is the result of rate increases in CMS-calculated
base rates as well as rate increases related to risk scores.
PDP: PDP premiums (after risk corridor adjustments) were $179.9 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to $150.0 million in the same period of 2008, an increase of
$29.9 million, or 19.9%. The increase in premiums for the current six month period is
primarily the result of increases in membership and PDP PMPM premium rates. Our average PMPM
premiums (after risk corridor adjustments) increased 8.0% to $104.24 in the current six month
period, as compared to $96.51 during the same 2008 period.
Fee Revenue. Fee revenue was $20.0 million in the current six month period of 2009 compared
to $15.9 million for the same period of 2008, an increase of $4.1 million. The increase in the
current period is attributable to increased management fees as a result of new IPAs under contract
since the same period in 2008 and higher membership in managed IPAs compared to the same period
last year.
Investment Income. Investment income was $2.7 million for the first six month period of 2009
as compared to $8.2 million for the comparable period of 2008, reflecting a decrease of $5.5
million, or 67.5%. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in the average yield on
invested and cash balances.
Medical Expense
Medicare Advantage. Medicare Advantage (including MA-PD) medical expense for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 increased $186.8 million, or 25.5%, to $918.3 million from $731.5 million for
the comparable period of 2008, which is primarily attributable to increases in PMPM medical expense
and membership increases in the 2009 period as compared to the 2008 period. For the six months
ended June 30, 2009, the Medicare Advantage MLR, was 81.8% as compared to 79.2% for the same period
of 2008, as adjusted to exclude favorable final CMS settlement adjustments associated with prior
years. (See Risk Adjustment Payments above.) The deterioration in the MLR for the current
period was primarily attributable to increased inpatient procedure costs in our Tennessee health
plan and increases in physician expenses in our Alabama, Tennessee, and Texas health plans. The
deterioration was partially offset by improvements in our Florida plans MLR attributable primarily
to hospital recontracting efforts. The comparative degradation in MA MLR in the 2009 period as
compared to the prior year period was also partially offset by MLR improvement in the drug benefit
component of our MA-PD plans in the current period.
Our Medicare Advantage medical expense calculated on a PMPM basis was $863.52 for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, compared with $788.90 for the comparable 2008 period, as adjusted to
exclude favorable retroactive risk adjustments associated with prior years.
23
PDP. PDP medical expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased $23.4 million to
$168.2 million, compared to $144.8 million in the same period last year. PDP MLR for the 2009 six
month period was 93.5%, compared to 96.6% in the same period in 2008. The decrease in PDP MLR for
the current period was primarily attributable to higher PDP revenue.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expense
SG&A for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $134.6 million as compared with $118.9 million
for the same prior year period, an increase of $15.7 million, or 13.2%. As a percentage of
revenue, SG&A expense decreased approximately 50 basis points for the six months ended June 30,
2009 compared to the prior year same period, primarily as a result of improved operating leverage.
The $15.7 million increase in the 2009 period as compared to the same period of the prior year is
the result of personnel cost increases, primarily related to growth in headcount and increases in
commissions associated with the growth in membership in the current period.
Consistent with historical trends, the company expects the majority of its sales and marketing
expenses to be incurred in the first and fourth quarters of each year in connection with the annual
Medicare enrollment cycle.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense was $15.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009
as compared with $14.2 million in the same period of 2008, representing an increase of $1.0
million, or 6.6%. The increase in the current period was the result of incremental amortization
expense associated with the acquisition in October 2008 of certain Medicare Advantage contracts
from Valley Baptist Health Plans operating in the Rio Grande Valley and incremental depreciation on
property and equipment additions.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $8.3 million in the 2009 six month period, compared with $10.0 million in
the 2008 same period. The decrease in the current period was the result of lower effective
interest rates and lower average principal balances outstanding. The weighted average interest
rate incurred on our borrowings during the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was 6.2%
and 6.8%, respectively (5.1% and 5.7%, respectively, exclusive of amortization of deferred
financing costs).
Income Tax Expense
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, income tax expense was $30.2 million, reflecting an
effective tax rate of 36.5%, versus $34.9 million, reflecting an effective tax rate of 36.3%, for
the same period of 2008. The higher rate in 2009 is primarily attributable to the estimated annual
decrease in non-taxable investment income.
Segment Information
We report our business in four segments: Medicare Advantage, stand-alone Prescription Drug
Plan, Commercial, and Corporate. Medicare Advantage (MA-PD) consists of Medicare-eligible
beneficiaries receiving healthcare benefits, including prescription drugs, through a coordinated
care plan qualifying under Part C and Part D of the Medicare Program. Stand-alone Prescription Drug
Plan (PDP) consists of Medicare-eligible beneficiaries receiving prescription drug benefits on a
stand-alone basis in accordance with Medicare Part D. Commercial consists of our commercial health
plan business. The Commercial segment was insignificant as of June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008.
The Corporate segment consists primarily of corporate expenses not allocated to the other
reportable segments. These segment groupings are also consistent with information used by our chief
executive officer in making operating decisions.
The results of each segment are measured and evaluated by earnings before interest expense,
depreciation and amortization expense, and income taxes (EBITDA). We do not allocate certain
corporate overhead amounts (classified as SG&A expense) or interest expense to our segments. We
evaluate interest expense, income taxes, and asset and liability details on a consolidated basis as
these items are managed in a corporate shared service environment and are not the responsibility of
segment operating management.
Revenue includes premium revenue, management and other fee income, and investment income.
24
Financial data by reportable segment for the three and six months ended June 30 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MA-PD |
|
PDP |
|
Commercial |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
Three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
594,255 |
|
|
$ |
87,496 |
|
|
$ |
779 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
682,543 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
62,797 |
|
|
|
5,788 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(6,757 |
) |
|
|
61,834 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
6,366 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
7,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
494,179 |
|
|
$ |
71,574 |
|
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
566,874 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
82,757 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
(918 |
) |
|
|
(7,714 |
) |
|
|
74,738 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
5,961 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
6,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,147,004 |
|
|
$ |
180,114 |
|
|
$ |
1,515 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
1,328,658 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
111,882 |
|
|
|
7,913 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(13,688 |
) |
|
|
106,099 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
12,722 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
15,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
963,984 |
|
|
$ |
152,006 |
|
|
$ |
3,386 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
1,119,583 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
133,281 |
|
|
|
1,545 |
|
|
|
(604 |
) |
|
|
(13,857 |
) |
|
|
120,365 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
14,233 |
|
As of January 1, 2009, the company revised its methodology for allocating the selling SG&A
expense, but only within its prescription drug operations, which resulted in allocating a greater
share of such expenses to the companys MA-PD segment. As such, the MA-PD
and PDP segments EBITDA amounts for the 2008 period include reclassification adjustments between
segments such that the periods presented are comparable.
A reconciliation of reportable segment EBITDA to net income included in the consolidated
statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
61,834 |
|
|
$ |
74,738 |
|
|
$ |
106,099 |
|
|
$ |
120,365 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(18,331 |
) |
|
|
(22,941 |
) |
|
|
(30,179 |
) |
|
|
(34,859 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,970 |
) |
|
|
(4,590 |
) |
|
|
(8,251 |
) |
|
|
(9,993 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(7,642 |
) |
|
|
(6,985 |
) |
|
|
(15,166 |
) |
|
|
(14,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
31,891 |
|
|
$ |
40,222 |
|
|
$ |
52,503 |
|
|
$ |
61,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use segment EBITDA as an analytical indicator for purposes of assessing segment
performance, as is common in the healthcare industry. Segment EBITDA should not be considered as a
measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles and segment EBITDA,
as presented, may not be comparable to other companies.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We finance our operations primarily through internally generated funds. All of our outstanding
funded indebtedness was incurred in connection with the acquisition of the LMC Health Plans in
October 2007. See Indebtedness below.
We generate cash primarily from premium revenue and our primary use of cash is the payment of
medical and SG&A expenses and principal and interest on indebtedness. We anticipate that our
current level of cash on hand, internally generated cash flows, and borrowings available under our
revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund our working capital needs, our debt service,
and anticipated capital expenditures over at least the next twelve months.
25
The reported changes in cash and cash equivalents for the six month period ended June 30,
2009, compared to the comparable period of 2008, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(8,430 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,272 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(15,656 |
) |
|
|
4,084 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
36,856 |
|
|
|
(16,251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
12,770 |
|
|
$ |
(19,439 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We received risk premium settlement payments from CMS of approximately $88.2 million in the
2009 third quarter.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flow provided by our operations and available cash
on hand. To date, we have not borrowed under our $100.0 million revolving credit facility. We used
cash from operating activities of $8.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared
to using cash of $7.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008. Additionally, current
period cash flows from operations were negatively impacted by the timing of incentive compensation
and income tax payments in 2009.
Cash Flows from Investing and Financing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the primary investing activities consisted of expenditures of $38.8 million to purchase investment
securities, the receipt of $29.6 million in proceeds from the maturity of investment securities,
$5.5 million
in property and equipment additions, and the expenditure of $0.9 million in additional consideration paid for the Valley Baptist Health
Plans acquisition. The investing activity in the prior year period consisted primarily of $36.3
million used to purchase investments, $44.1 million in proceeds from the maturity of investment
securities, and $3.8 million in property and equipment additions. During the six months ended June
30, 2009, the companys financing activities consisted primarily of $53.5 million of funds received
in excess of funds withdrawn from CMS for the benefit of members, and $16.7 million for the
repayment of long-term debt. The financing activity in the prior year period consisted primarily
of $29.2 million of funds received in excess of funds withdrawn from CMS for the benefit of
members, $28.3 million used for the purchase of treasury stock and $17.4 million for the repayment
of long-term debt. Funds due from CMS (received for the benefit) of members are recorded on our
balance sheet at June 30, 2009 and at December 31, 2008. We anticipate settling approximately
$36.0 million of such Part D related amounts (including risk corridor settlements) relating to 2008
with CMS during the second half of 2009 as part of the final settlement of Part D payments for the
2008 plan year.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
At June 30, 2009, the companys cash and cash equivalents were $295.0 million, $57.7 million
of which was held at unregulated subsidiaries. Approximately $51.9 million of the cash balance
relates to amounts held by the company for the benefit of its Part D members. We expect CMS to
settle this amount, related to the 2009 plan year, during the second half of 2010.
The volatility and uncertainty in the current credit and stock markets have not had a material
effect on the companys financial condition or results of operations and, at least as currently
foreseeable by management of the company, such conditions are not expected to adversely affect the
companys liquidity or operations. Substantially all of the companys sources of liquidity are in
the form of cash and cash equivalents ($295.0 million at June 30, 2009), the majority of which
($237.3 million at June 30, 2009) is held by the companys regulated insurance subsidiaries, which
amounts are required by law and by our credit agreement to be invested in low-risk, short-term,
highly-liquid investments (such as government securities, money market funds, deposit accounts, and
overnight repurchase agreements). The company also invests in securities ($99.7 million at June
30, 2009), primarily corporate and government debt securities, that it generally intends, and has
the ability, to hold to maturity. Because the company is not relying on these debt instruments for
liquidity, short term fluctuations in market pricing generally do not affect the companys ability
to meet its liquidity needs. To date, the company has not experienced any material issuer defaults
on its debt investments. As of June 30, 2009, the
26
company had approximately $9.8 million of investments that are collateralized by mortgages, no
material amount of which are collateralized by subprime mortgages.
Statutory Capital Requirements
Our HMO and regulated insurance subsidiaries are required to maintain satisfactory minimum net
worth requirements established by their respective state departments of insurance. At June 30,
2009, our Texas (200% of authorized control level was $29.4 million; actual $57.7 million),
Tennessee (minimum $17.5 million; actual $92.7 million), Florida (minimum $9.9 million; actual
$21.4 million) and Alabama (minimum $1.1 million; actual $43.1 million) HMO subsidiaries as well as
our life and health insurance subsidiary (minimum $1.4 million; actual $10.5 million) were in
compliance with statutory minimum net worth requirements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the state
departments of insurance can require our HMO and regulated insurance subsidiaries to maintain
minimum levels of statutory capital in excess of amounts required under the applicable state law if
they determine that maintaining additional statutory capital is in the best interest of our
members. In addition, as a condition to its approval of the LMC Health Plans acquisition, the
Florida Office of Insurance Regulation has required the Florida plan to maintain 115% of the
statutory surplus otherwise required by Florida law until September 2010.
The HMOs and regulated insurance subsidiaries are restricted from making distributions without
appropriate regulatory notifications and approvals or to the extent such distributions would put
them out of compliance with statutory net worth requirements. During the six months ended June 30,
2009, our Alabama and Texas HMO subsidiaries distributed $8.0 million and $15.0 million in cash,
respectively, to the parent company.
Effective July 31, 2009, we novated our PDP members and transferred the related assets and
liabilities of the PDP business from the Companys Tennessee insurance subsidiary to our life and
health insurance subsidiary. In anticipation of the novation, we were required to infuse $2.5
million of capital into our life and health subsidiary in the second quarter and agree to other financial measures
relating to such subsidiarys net worth and capital in order to comply with various state
regulatory requirements. As a result of the novation and corresponding asset transfer, our
Tennessee HMOs statutory capital requirements will no longer be impacted by the PDP business
segments operating results and financial position.
Indebtedness
Long-term debt at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Senior secured term loan |
|
$ |
251,335 |
|
|
$ |
268,013 |
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(28,724 |
) |
|
|
(32,277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt less current portion |
|
$ |
222,611 |
|
|
$ |
235,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with funding the acquisition of LMC Health Plans, on October 1, 2007, we entered
into agreements with respect to a $400.0 million, five-year credit facility (collectively, the
Credit Agreement) which, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, provides for
$300.0 million in term loans and a $100.0 million revolving credit facility. The $100.0 million
revolving credit facility, which is available for working capital and general corporate purposes
including capital expenditures and permitted acquisitions, is undrawn as of the date of this
report. Due to Credit Agreement covenants restricting the companys leverage, available borrowings
under the revolving credit facility at June 30, 2009 were limited to $34.0 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At June 30, 2009, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangement requiring disclosure.
Commitments and Contingencies
We did not experience any material changes to contractual obligations outside the ordinary
course of business during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
27
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires our management to make a
number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amount of assets and liabilities and
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. We base our
estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable
under the circumstances. Changes in estimates are recorded if and when better information becomes
available. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results
could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in estimates resulting from continuing
changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statements in future
periods.
We believe that the accounting policies discussed below are those that are most important to
the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and that require our
managements most difficult, subjective, and complex judgments. For a more complete discussion of
these and other critical accounting policies and estimates of the company, see our 2008 Form 10-K.
Medical Expense and Medical Claims Liability
Medical expense is recognized in the period in which services are provided and includes an
estimate of the cost of medical expense that has been incurred but not yet reported, or IBNR.
Medical expense includes claim payments, capitation payments, risk sharing payments and pharmacy
costs, net of rebates, as well as estimates of future payments of claims incurred, net of
reinsurance. Capitation payments represent monthly contractual fees disbursed to physicians and
other providers who are responsible for providing medical care to members. Pharmacy costs represent
payments for members prescription drug benefits, net of rebates from drug manufacturers. Rebates
are recognized when earned, according to the contractual arrangements with the respective vendors.
Premiums we pay to reinsurers are reported as medical expense and related reinsurance recoveries
are reported as deductions from medical expense.
Medical claims liability includes medical claims reported to the plans but not yet paid as
well as an actuarially determined estimate of claims that have been incurred but not yet reported.
The IBNR component of total medical claims liability is based on our historical claims data,
current enrollment, health service utilization statistics, and other related information.
Estimating IBNR is complex and involves a significant amount of judgment. Accordingly, it
represents our most critical accounting estimate. The development of the IBNR includes the use of
standard actuarial developmental methodologies, including completion factors and claims trends,
which take into account the potential for adverse claims developments, and considers favorable and
unfavorable prior period developments. Actual claims payments will differ, however, from our
estimates. A worsening or improvement of our claims trend or changes in completion factors from
those that we assumed in estimating medical claims liabilities at June 30, 2009 would cause these
estimates to change in the near term and such a change could be material.
As discussed above, actual claim payments will differ from our estimates. The period between
incurrence of the expense and payment is, as with most health insurance companies, relatively
short, however, with over 90% of claims typically paid within 60 days of the month in which the
claim is incurred. Although there is a risk of material variances in the amounts of estimated and
actual claims, the variance is known quickly. Accordingly, we expect that substantially all of the
estimated medical claims payable as of the end of any fiscal period (whether a quarter or year end)
will be known and paid during the next fiscal period.
Our policy is to record the best estimate of medical expense IBNR. Using actuarial models, we
calculate a minimum amount and maximum amount of the IBNR component. To most accurately determine
the best estimate, our actuaries determine the point estimate within their minimum and maximum
range by similar medical expense categories within lines of business. The medical expense
categories we use are: in-patient facility, outpatient facility, all professional expense, and
pharmacy. The lines of business are Medicare and commercial.
We apply different estimation methods depending on the month of service for which incurred
claims are being estimated. For the more recent months, which account for the majority of the
amount of IBNR, we estimate our claims incurred by applying the observed trend factors to the
trailing twelve-month PMPM costs. For prior months, costs have been estimated using completion
factors. In order to estimate the PMPMs for the most recent months, we validate our estimates of
the most recent months utilization levels to the utilization levels in older months using
actuarial techniques that incorporate a historical analysis of claim payments, including trends in
cost of care provided, and timeliness of submission and processing of claims.
28
Actuarial standards of practice generally require the actuarially developed medical claims
liability estimates to be sufficient, taking into account an assumption of moderately adverse
conditions. As such, we previously recognized in our medical claims liability a separate provision
for adverse claims development, which was intended to account for moderately adverse conditions in
claims payment patterns, historical trends, and environmental factors. In periods prior to the
fourth quarter of 2008, we believed that a separate provision for adverse claims development was
appropriate to cover additional unknown adverse claims not anticipated by the standard assumptions
used to produce the IBNR estimates that were incurred prior to, but paid after, a period end. When
determining our estimate of IBNR at December 31, 2008, however, we determined that a separate
provision for adverse claims development was no longer necessary, primarily as a result of the
growth and stabilizing trends experienced in our Medicare business, continued favorable development
of prior period IBNR estimates, and the declining significance of our commercial line of business.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the completion and claims trend factors and
the impact on our operating results caused by changes in these factors that management believes are
reasonably likely based on our historical experience and June 30, 2009 data (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion Factor (a) |
|
Claims Trend Factor (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) |
Increase |
|
in Medical |
|
Increase |
|
in Medical |
(Decrease) |
|
Claims |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Claims |
in Factor |
|
Liability |
|
in Factor |
|
Liability |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
(4,749 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
$ |
(2,590 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(3,202 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1,724 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1,619 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Impact due to change in completion factor for the most recent three months. Completion
factors indicate how complete claims paid to date are in relation to estimates for a given
reporting period. Accordingly, an increase in completion factor results in a decrease in the
remaining estimated liability for medical claims. |
|
(b) |
|
Impact due to change in annualized medical cost trends used to estimate PMPM costs for the
most recent three months. |
Each month, we re-examine the previously established medical claims liability estimates based
on actual claim submissions and other relevant changes in facts and circumstances. As the liability
estimates recorded in prior periods become more exact, we increase or decrease the amount of the
estimates, and include the changes in medical expenses in the period in which the change is
identified. In every reporting period, our operating results include the effects of more completely
developed medical claims liability estimates associated with prior periods.
In establishing medical claims liability, we also consider premium deficiency situations and
evaluate the necessity for additional related liabilities. There were no required premium
deficiency accruals at June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.
Premium Revenue Recognition
We generate revenues primarily from premiums we receive from CMS to provide healthcare
benefits to our members. We receive premium payments on a PMPM basis from CMS to provide healthcare
benefits to our Medicare members, which premiums are fixed (subject to retroactive risk adjustment)
on an annual basis by contracts with CMS. Although the amount we receive from CMS for each member
is fixed, the amount varies among Medicare plans according to, among other things, plan benefits,
demographics, geographic location, age, gender, and the relative risk score of the membership.
We generally receive premiums on a monthly basis in advance of providing services. Premiums
collected in advance are deferred and reported as deferred revenue. We recognize premium revenue
during the period in which we are obligated to provide services to our members. Any amounts that
have not been received are recorded on the balance sheet as accounts receivable.
29
Our Medicare premium revenue is subject to periodic adjustment under what is referred to as
CMSs risk adjustment payment methodology based on the health risk of our members. Risk adjustment
uses health status indicators to correlate the payments to the health acuity of the member, and
consequently establishes incentives for plans to enroll and treat less healthy Medicare
beneficiaries. Under the risk adjustment payment methodology, coordinated care plans must capture,
collect, and report diagnosis code information to CMS. After reviewing the respective submissions,
CMS establishes the payments to Medicare plans generally at the beginning of the calendar year, and
then adjusts premium levels on two separate occasions on a retroactive basis. The first retroactive
risk premium adjustment for a given fiscal year generally occurs during the third quarter of such
fiscal year. This initial settlement (the Initial CMS Settlement) represents the updating of risk
scores for the current year based on the prior years dates of service. CMS then issues a final
retroactive risk premium adjustment settlement for that fiscal year in the following year (the
Final CMS Settlement). As of January 2008, we estimate and record on a monthly basis both the
Initial CMS Settlement and the Final CMS Settlement.
We develop our estimates for risk premium adjustment settlement utilizing historical
experience and predictive actuarial models as sufficient member risk score data becomes available
over the course of each CMS plan year. Our actuarial models are populated with available risk score
data on our members. Risk premium adjustments are based on member risk score data from the previous
year. Risk score data for members who entered our plans during the current plan year, however, is
not available for use in our models; therefore, we make assumptions regarding the risk scores of
this subset of our member population.
All such estimated amounts are periodically updated as additional diagnosis code information
is reported to CMS and adjusted to actual amounts when the ultimate adjustment settlements are
either received from CMS or the company receives notification from CMS of such settlement amounts.
We have refined our process of estimating risk settlements by increasing the frequency of risk data
submissions to CMS which results in a more timely and complete data set used to populate our
actuarial models.
As a result of the variability of factors, including plan risk scores, that determine such
estimations, the actual amount of CMSs retroactive risk premium settlement adjustments could be
materially more or less than our estimates. Consequently, our estimate of our plans risk scores
for any period and our accrual of settlement premiums related thereto, may result in favorable or
unfavorable adjustments to our Medicare premium revenue and, accordingly, our profitability. There
can be no assurances that any such differences will not have a material effect on any future
quarterly or annual results of operations.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the Final CMS Settlements and the impact on
premium revenue caused by differences between actual and estimated settlement amounts that
management believes are reasonably likely, based on our historical experience and premium revenue
for the six months ending June 30, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
Increase |
|
(Decrease) |
(Decrease) |
|
In Settlement |
in Estimate |
|
Receivable |
|
1.5 |
% |
|
$ |
16,619 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
11,079 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
5,540 |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(5,540 |
) |
30
Goodwill and Indefinite-Life Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of assets of businesses acquired.
Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have
an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment at least
annually. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the
assets fair value. This determination is made at the reporting unit level and consists of two
steps. First, the company determines the fair value of the reporting unit and compares it to its
carrying amount. Second, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an
impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the units goodwill over the
implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating
the fair value of the reporting units in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, in
accordance with SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations. The residual fair value after
this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill. We currently have four
reporting units Alabama, Florida, Tennessee and Texas.
Goodwill valuations have been determined using an income approach based on the present value
of future cash flows of each reporting unit. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill, we
consider historical results, current operating trends and results, and we make estimates and
assumptions about premiums, medical cost trends, margins and discount rates based on our budgets,
business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and regulatory data. Each of
these factors contains inherent uncertainties and management exercises substantial judgment and
discretion in evaluating and applying these factors.
Although we believe we have sufficient current and historical information available to us to
test for impairment, it is possible that actual cash flows could differ from the estimated cash
flows used in our impairment tests. We could also be required to evaluate the recoverability of
goodwill prior to the annual assessment if we experience various triggering events, including
significant declines in margins or sustained and significant market capitalization declines. These
types of events and the resulting analyses could result in goodwill impairment charges in the
future. Impairment charges, although non-cash in nature, could adversely affect our financial
results in the periods of such charges. In addition, impairment charges may limit our ability to
obtain financing in the future.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS No. 166). This statement amends SFAS No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,
by: eliminating the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPE); clarifying and
amending the derecognition criteria for a transfer to be accounted for as a sale; amending and
clarifying the unit of account eligible for sale accounting; and requiring that a transferor
initially measure at fair value and recognize all assets obtained (for example beneficial
interests) and liabilities incurred as a result of a transfer of an entire financial asset or group
of financial assets accounted for as a sale. Additionally, on and after the effective date,
existing QSPEs must be evaluated for consolidation by reporting entities in accordance with the
applicable consolidation guidance. SFAS No. 166 requires enhanced disclosures about, among other
things, a transferors continuing involvement with transfers of financial assets accounted for as
sales, the risks inherent in the transferred financial assets that have been retained, and the
nature and financial effect of restrictions on the transferors assets that continue to be reported
in the statement of financial position. SFAS No. 166 will be effective as of January 1, 2010. We
are currently evaluating the impact that this statement will have on our financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(SFAS No. 167). SFAS No. 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Variable Interest Entities
for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity (VIE) and requires an enterprise
to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises variable interest or interests give it
a controlling financial interest in a VIE. Under SFAS No. 167, an enterprise has a controlling
financial interest when it has a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance and b) the obligation to absorb losses of
the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant
to the VIE. SFAS No. 167 also requires an enterprise to assess whether it has an implicit financial
responsibility to ensure that a VIE operates as designed when determining whether it has power to
direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance.
SFAS No. 167 also requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary
of a VIE, requires enhanced disclosures and eliminates the scope exclusion for qualifying
special-purpose entities. SFAS No. 167 will be effective as of January 1, 2010. We are currently
evaluating the impact that this statement will have on our financial statements.
31
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
No material changes have occurred in our exposure to interest rate risk since the information
previously reported under the caption Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk in our 2008 Form 10-K, other than an increase in our cash and cash equivalents in the
ordinary course of business, the sensitivity of which to changes in interest rates we would not
consider material to our business.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had approximately $9.8 million of investments that are
collateralized by mortgages, no material amounts of which are collateralized by subprime mortgages.
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
Our senior management carried out the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange
Act, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and
Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as
defined in Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act (Disclosure Controls). Based on the
evaluation, our senior management, including our CEO and CFO, concluded that, as of June 30, 2009,
our Disclosure Controls were effective.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and
internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of
the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that
there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, with the Company
have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error and mistake.
Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of
two or more people, or by management override of controls.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.
32
Part II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1: |
|
Legal Proceedings |
We are not currently involved in any pending legal proceeding that we believe is material to
our financial condition or results of operations. We are, however, involved from time to time in
routine legal matters and other claims incidental to our business, including employment-related
claims, claims relating to our health plans contractual relationships with providers and members,
and claims relating to marketing practices of sales agents and agencies that are employed by, or
independent contractors to, our health plans. The Company believes that the resolution of existing
routine matters and other incidental claims will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition or results of operations.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should consider carefully
the risks and uncertainties previously reported and described under the captions Part I Item
1A. Risk Factors in the 2008 Form 10-K, the occurrence of any of which could materially and
adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results. The risks
previously reported and described in our 2008 Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our business.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently consider to be
immaterial also could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition,
and operating results.
The following risk factor is updated or otherwise revised from our 2008 Form 10-K to reflect
new or additional risks and uncertainties:
Reductions or Less Than Expected Increases in Funding for Medicare Programs and other Healthcare
Reform Initiatives Could Significantly Reduce Our Profitability.
Medicare premiums, including premiums paid to our PDP, account for substantially all of our
revenue. As a consequence, our profitability is dependent on government funding levels for
Medicare programs. The President and both houses of Congress are currently engaged in active debate
concerning the reformation of the structure and funding for the U.S. healthcare system, including
the Medicare program. Although none of the bills currently being considered have become law,
various proposals contain items that would have a material adverse impact on Medicare Advantage
members and Medicare Advantage plans, generally, and our members and plans, specifically,
including, without limitation, provisions reducing Medicare funding, requiring competitive
bidding against a reduced plan benefit design, legally-imposed minimum medical loss ratios, and
further limitations on Medicare Advantage marketing and enrollment periods. We are not able to
predict with any certainty what provisions will become law, if any, or the potential impact on the
profitability or viability of any of our Medicare Advantage plans.
As currently structured, the premium rates paid to Medicare health plans like ours are
established by contract, although the rates differ depending on a combination of factors, including
upper payment limits established by CMS, a members health profile and status, age, gender, county
or region, benefit mix, member eligibility categories, and a members risk score.
In April 2009, CMS published its 2010 Medicare Advantage plan capitation rates, which included
a risk scoring coding intensity adjustment, applicable to all Medicare Advantage members that
substantially reduced previously-anticipated 2010 Medicare Advantage premium rates. Before taking
into account premium changes relating to changes in our plan members specific risk scores, we
estimate that CMSs plan-wide reduction in members risk scores and other rate changes will result
in a decrease by 4-5% in 2010 premium rates payable to our health plans as compared to 2009 premium
rates. In June 2009 we submitted our 2010 Medicare Advantage plan bids to CMS that took into
account the rate reductions by, among other things, adjusting plan benefits, member premiums, and
co-pays from those currently being offered to our Medicare Advantage plan members. We believe that
our proposed 2010 plan benefits, although reduced from 2009 levels, are competitive and will be
relatively attractive to our existing and prospective members. Moreover, we believe our 2010 plan
bids are structured to be consistent with our historical MLR targets and profit margins. There can
be no assurance, however, that the reduction in government capitation rates and our plans bids in
response thereto will not have a material adverse impact on our member growth expectations and
profitability.
33
The 2008 Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA) provides for reduced
federal spending on the Medicare Advantage program by a total of $48.7 billion over the 2008-2018
period, and MIPPA requires the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, or MedPac, to report on both
the quality of care provided under Medicare Advantage plans and the cost to the Medicare program of
such plans. In June 2009, MedPac released its report concluding that, in 2009, the
Medicare program will pay substantially more for Medicare Advantage enrollees than if such
enrollees were in traditional fee-for-service Medicare and recommending lower payments to, and
quality performance standards, for Medicare Advantage plans. There can be no assurance that Congress will not adopt into law some or all of MedPacs
recommendations, which, if so adopted, could adversely affect plan revenues.
|
|
|
Item 2: |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our ability to purchase common stock and to pay cash dividends is limited by our Credit
Agreement. As a holding company, our ability to repurchase common stock and to pay cash dividends
are dependent to a large extent on the availability of cash dividends from our regulated HMO
subsidiaries, which are restricted by the laws of the states in which we operate and by CMS
regulations.
During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company did not repurchase any
shares of its common stock.
In June 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to
repurchase up to $50.0 million of the Companys common stock over the succeeding 12 months. In May
2008, the Companys Board of Directors extended the expiration date of the program to June 30,
2009. Pursuant to the open market repurchase program, which expired in accordance with its terms
on June 30, 2009, the Company repurchased a total of 2,841,182 shares of its common stock for
approximately $47.3 million, or at an average cost of $16.65 per share.
|
|
|
Item 3: |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
Inapplicable.
|
|
|
Item 4: |
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
The Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) on May 19, 2009. At
the Annual Meeting, the stockholders voted on the election of three Class I Directors to three-year
terms and the ratification of the selection of KPMG, LLP as the Companys independent accounting
firm for the year ending December 31, 2009. Proxies were solicited pursuant to and in accordance
with Section 14(a) and Regulation 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act).
The three Class I Directors elected at the Annual Meeting were Bruce M. Fried, with 46,371,513
votes cast for his election and 1,616,077 votes withheld, Herbert A. Fritch, with 45,133,085 votes
cast for his election and 2,854,505 votes withheld, and Joseph P. Nolan, with 46,435,345 votes cast
for his election and 1,552,245 votes withheld. The other directors, whose terms of office as
directors continued after the Annual Meeting, are Robert Z. Hensley, Benjamin Leon, Jr., Sharad
Mansukani, Russell K. Mayerfeld, and Martin S. Rash.
The selection of KPMG as the Companys independent accounting firm for the year ending
December 31, 2009 was approved at the Annual Meeting with 47,435,583 votes cast in favor, 549,123
votes cast against, and 2,884 votes abstaining.
|
|
|
Item 5: |
|
Other Information |
Inapplicable.
See Exhibit Index following signature page.
34
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEALTHSPRING, INC.
|
|
Date: August 4, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Karey L. Witty
|
|
|
|
Karey L. Witty |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
35
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Severance and Noncompetition Agreement between Karey L. Witty and HealthSpring, Inc.* |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Severance and Noncompetition Agreement between Michael G. Mirt and HealthSpring,
Inc.* |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates management contract or compensatory plan, contract, or arrangement. |
36