e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009
of
AGCO CORPORATION
A Delaware Corporation
IRS Employer Identification No. 58-1960019
SEC File Number 1-12930
4205 River Green Parkway
Duluth, GA 30096
(770) 813-9200
AGCO Corporation (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
AGCO Corporation is not yet required to submit electronically and post on its corporate web
site Interactive Data Files required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of regulation
S-T.
As of July 31, 2009, AGCO Corporation had 92,449,535 shares of common stock outstanding. AGCO
Corporation is a large accelerated filer.
AGCO Corporation is a well-known seasoned issuer and is not a shell company.
AGCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AGCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited and in millions, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
190.2 |
|
|
$ |
512.2 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
916.7 |
|
|
|
815.6 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
1,443.0 |
|
|
|
1,389.9 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
40.5 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
185.5 |
|
|
|
197.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,783.2 |
|
|
|
3,005.2 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
878.9 |
|
|
|
811.1 |
|
Investment in affiliates |
|
|
306.6 |
|
|
|
275.1 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
69.6 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
172.0 |
|
|
|
176.9 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
610.1 |
|
|
|
587.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,886.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,954.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Convertible senior subordinated notes |
|
|
189.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
670.3 |
|
|
|
1,027.1 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
781.2 |
|
|
|
799.8 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
94.6 |
|
|
|
151.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,735.3 |
|
|
|
1,978.5 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
444.6 |
|
|
|
625.0 |
|
Pensions and postretirement health care benefits |
|
|
177.1 |
|
|
|
173.6 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
105.6 |
|
|
|
108.1 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
74.0 |
|
|
|
49.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,536.6 |
|
|
|
2,934.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity component of redeemable convertible senior subordinated notes |
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGCO Corporation stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, no
shares issued or outstanding in 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock; $0.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized,
92,449,535 and 91,844,193 shares issued and outstanding
at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,058.3 |
|
|
|
1,067.4 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,473.2 |
|
|
|
1,382.1 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(202.3 |
) |
|
|
(436.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AGCO Corporation stockholders equity |
|
|
2,330.1 |
|
|
|
2,014.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,337.6 |
|
|
|
2,020.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, temporary equity and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,886.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,954.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
AGCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited and in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,795.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,395.4 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
1,503.7 |
|
|
|
1,967.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
291.5 |
|
|
|
428.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
154.2 |
|
|
|
181.0 |
|
Engineering expenses |
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
|
Restructuring and other infrequent expenses |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
77.8 |
|
|
|
189.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and equity in net earnings of affiliates |
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
|
170.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
55.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in net earnings of affiliates |
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net earnings of affiliates |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
57.0 |
|
|
|
129.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to AGCO Corporation and subsidiaries |
|
$ |
57.4 |
|
|
$ |
129.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share attributable to AGCO Corporation and
subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
92.3 |
|
|
|
91.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
93.8 |
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
AGCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited and in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,374.2 |
|
|
$ |
4,182.0 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
2,810.4 |
|
|
|
3,438.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
563.8 |
|
|
|
743.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
315.8 |
|
|
|
351.6 |
|
Engineering expenses |
|
|
100.1 |
|
|
|
98.4 |
|
Restructuring and other infrequent expenses |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
136.4 |
|
|
|
283.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and equity in net earnings of affiliates |
|
|
98.2 |
|
|
|
250.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
85.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before equity in net earnings of affiliates |
|
|
69.4 |
|
|
|
164.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net earnings of affiliates |
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
91.3 |
|
|
|
188.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to AGCO Corporation and subsidiaries |
|
$ |
91.1 |
|
|
$ |
188.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share attributable to AGCO Corporation and
subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
92.1 |
|
|
|
91.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
92.9 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
AGCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited and in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to AGCO Corporation and subsidiaries |
|
$ |
91.1 |
|
|
$ |
188.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
58.2 |
|
|
|
63.5 |
|
Deferred debt issuance cost amortization |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
Amortization of debt discount |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Stock compensation |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
Equity in net earnings of affiliates, net of cash received |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.8 |
) |
Deferred income tax provision |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
17.2 |
|
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
Inventories, net |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
(320.4 |
) |
Other current and noncurrent assets |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(39.7 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(344.6 |
) |
|
|
85.9 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(28.1 |
) |
|
|
69.3 |
|
Other current and noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(358.6 |
) |
|
|
(127.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(267.5 |
) |
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(101.5 |
) |
|
|
(99.7 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Restricted cash and other |
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(71.3 |
) |
|
|
(98.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Repayment of) proceeds from debt obligations, net |
|
|
(19.4 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Payment of minimum tax withholdings on stock compensation |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
Payment of debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Investments by noncontrolling interests |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(23.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(322.0 |
) |
|
|
(23.9 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
512.2 |
|
|
|
582.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
190.2 |
|
|
$ |
558.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
AGCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The condensed consolidated financial statements of AGCO Corporation and its subsidiaries (the
Company or AGCO) included herein have been prepared in accordance with United States generally
accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the opinion of management, the
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which
are of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position,
results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the periods presented. These condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited
financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the
results for the year.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162
(SFAS No. 168), which stipulates that the FASB Accounting Standards Codification is the source of
authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities.
SFAS No. 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 168 for its third quarter ending
September 30, 2009. The implementation of this standard will not have an impact on the Companys
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(SFAS No. 167). SFAS No. 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities (FIN 46(R)), to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for
determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and requires a qualitative
analysis to determine whether an enterprises variable interest gives it a controlling financial
interest in a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 amends certain guidance in FIN 46(R) for
determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity. This standard also requires ongoing
reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity.
SFAS No. 167 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2009. Earlier adoption of SFAS No. 167 is prohibited. The adoption
of the standard could impact the consolidation or deconsolidation of certain of the Companys joint
ventures. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 167
on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
amendment to SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities (SFAS No. 166). SFAS No. 166 eliminates the concept of a
qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPE), changes the requirements for derecognizing financial
assets and requires additional disclosures in order to enhance information reported to users of
financial statements by providing greater transparency about transfers of financial assets,
including securitization transactions, and an entitys continuing involvement in and exposure to
the risks related to transferred financial assets. SFAS No. 166 is effective for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2009. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the
potential
5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 166 on its accounts receivable securitization facilities in
the United States, Canada and Europe, as well as other financing facilities around the world (as
are more fully described in Notes 13 and 16). Upon adoption of SFAS No. 166, the Company may be
required to recognize such receivables within its consolidated balance sheets with a corresponding
liability equivalent to the funded balance of the facilities.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165).
SFAS No. 165 provides guidance on managements assessment of subsequent events and incorporates
this guidance into accounting literature. SFAS No. 165 is effective prospectively for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard did not have an
impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations. The Company evaluated
subsequent events through August 7, 2009.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) SFAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair
Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP SFAS 157-4). FSP SFAS 157-4 provides
additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly
decreased in relation to normal market activity. Additionally, FSP SFAS 157-4 provides guidance on
identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. FSP SFAS 157-4 requires
interim disclosures of the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value reflecting
changes in the valuation techniques and related inputs. FSP SFAS 157-4 is effective for interim
and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and is to be applied prospectively. The
adoption of FSP SFAS 157-4 did not have an impact on the Companys results of operations or
financial position.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB)
No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB
28-1). This FSP amends SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(SFAS No. 107) and APB No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosures about fair
value of financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value in interim financial
statements as well as in annual financial statements. Prior to this FSP, fair value for these
assets and liabilities was only disclosed annually. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 applies to all
financial instruments within the scope of SFAS No. 107 and requires all entities to disclose the
methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments. FSP
FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. In periods
after initial adoption, this FSP requires comparative disclosures only for periods ending after
initial adoption. The adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 did not have an impact on the
Companys results of operations or financial position (Note 6).
In December 2008, the FASB affirmed FSP No. SFAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP FAS 132(R)-1). FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires additional
disclosures about assets held in an employers defined benefit pension or postretirement plan,
primarily related to categories and fair value measurements of plan assets. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 is
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The Company will adopt the disclosure
requirements for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB No. 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments
That May be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (including Partial Cash Settlement) (FSP APB 14-1).
The FSP requires that the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments that may
be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement), commonly referred to as an
Instrument C under Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 90-19, Convertible Bonds with
Issuer Options to Settle for Cash upon Conversion (EITF Issue No. 90-19), be separated to
account for
6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
the fair value
of the debt and equity components as of the date of issuance to reflect the issuers
nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. The FSP is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and is to be applied retrospectively to all periods
presented (retroactive restatement) pursuant to the guidance in SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes
and Error Corrections. The adoption of the FSP on January 1, 2009 impacted the accounting
treatment of the Companys 13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes due 2033 and its 11/4%
convertible senior subordinated notes due 2036 by reclassifying a portion of the convertible notes
balances to additional paid-in capital representing the estimated fair value of the conversion
feature as of the date of issuance and creating a discount on the convertible notes that will be
amortized through interest expense over the lives of the convertible notes. The resulting
amortization resulted in a significant increase in interest expense and, therefore, reduced net
income and basic and diluted earnings per share within the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations. On January 1, 2009, the Company reduced its Retained earnings and
convertible senior subordinated notes balance included within Long-term debt by approximately
$37.2 million and $57.0 million, respectively, and increased its Additional paid-in capital
balance by approximately $94.2 million. Due to a tax valuation allowance established in the United
States, there was no deferred tax impact upon adoption. In accordance with the provisions of FSP
APB 14-1, prior periods have been retroactively restated to reflect the adoption of the standard.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 is
intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by
requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an
entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 161 on January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary should be reported as equity in a companys consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated net income should include the net income for both the parent and the noncontrolling
interest, with disclosure of both amounts on a companys consolidated statements of operations.
The calculation of earnings per share will continue to be based on income amounts attributable to
the parent. The Company adopted SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009 (Note 2).
2. CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
The Company has analyzed the provisions of FIN 46(R) as they relate to the accounting for its
investments in joint ventures and determined that it is the primary beneficiary of two of its joint
ventures.
GIMA is a joint venture between AGCO and Claas Tractor SAS to cooperate in the field of
purchasing, design and manufacturing of components for agricultural tractors. Each party has a 50%
ownership interest in the joint venture and has an investment of approximately 4.2 million in the
joint venture. Both parties purchase all of the production output of the joint venture. In
analyzing the provisions of FIN 46(R), the Company determined that it was the primary beneficiary
of the joint venture due to the fact that the Company purchases a majority of the production
output, and thus absorbs a majority of the gains or losses associated with the joint venture.
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No.160 on January 1, 2009 and, thus, reclassified
the noncontrolling interest related to GIMA of approximately $6.0 million as of January 1, 2009
from Other noncurrent liabilities to a component of equity within the Companys Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements. The Companys other consolidated joint venture was established
in January 2009 and is immaterial to the Companys financial position and results of operations.
Refer to Note 12 for further
7
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
details of the Companys other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to AGCO Corporation
and the noncontrolling interests discussed above.
3. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER INFREQUENT EXPENSES
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company recorded restructuring and other infrequent
expenses of approximately $2.8 million. These charges primarily related to severance and other
related costs associated with the Companys rationalization of its operations in the United States, the
United Kingdom and Finland. The rationalization will result in the termination of approximately 246
employees. Approximately $2.0 million of severance and other related costs had been paid as of
June 30, 2009, and 138 of the employees had been terminated. The $0.8 million of severance and
other related costs accrued at June 30, 2009 are expected to be paid during 2009.
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company recorded and incurred employee relocation costs
of approximately $0.1 million associated with the closure of one of its German sales offices
initiated in 2006.
4. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company recorded stock compensation expense as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock compensation expense |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
$ |
15.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Incentive Plans
Under the 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan), up to 5.0 million shares of AGCO
common stock may be issued. The 2006 Plan allows the Company, under the direction of the Board of
Directors Compensation Committee, to make grants of performance shares, stock appreciation rights,
stock options and restricted stock awards to employees, officers and non-employee directors of the
Company.
Employee Plans
The weighted average grant-date fair value of performance awards granted under the 2006 Plan
during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $21.45 and $57.22, respectively.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company granted 1,222,000 awards for the
three-year performance period commencing in 2009 and ending in 2011, assuming the maximum target
level of performance is achieved. Performance award transactions during the six months ended June
30, 2009 were as follows and are presented as if the Company were to achieve its maximum levels of
performance under the plan:
8
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Shares awarded but not earned at January 1 |
|
|
1,446,168 |
|
Shares awarded |
|
|
1,222,000 |
|
Shares forfeited or unearned |
|
|
(55,112 |
) |
Shares earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares awarded but not earned at June 30 |
|
|
2,613,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009, the total compensation cost related to unearned performance awards not
yet recognized, assuming the Companys current projected assessment of the level of performance
that will be achieved and earned, was approximately $16.6 million, and the weighted average period
over which it is expected to be recognized is approximately one year.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded stock compensation
expense of approximately $0.7 million and $1.2 million, respectively, associated with stock settled
stock appreciation rights (SSAR) awards. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
the Company recorded stock compensation expense of approximately $0.4 million and $0.8 million,
respectively, associated with SSAR awards. The Company estimated the fair value of the grants
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company utilized the simplified method for
estimating the expected term of granted SSARs during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as afforded
by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107, Share-Based Payment (SAB Topic 14), and SAB No.
110, Share-Based Payment (SAB Topic 14.D.2). The expected term used to value a grant under the
simplified method is the mid-point between the vesting date and the contractual term of the SSAR.
As the Company has only been granting SSARs since April 2006, it does not believe it has sufficient
relevant experience regarding employee exercise behavior. The weighted average grant-date fair
value of SSARs granted and the weighted average assumptions under the Black-Scholes option model
were as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
7.39 |
|
|
$ |
17.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average assumptions under
Black-Scholes option model: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life of awards (years) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
45.2 |
% |
|
|
38.0 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
SSAR transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
SSARs outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
415,791 |
|
SSARs granted |
|
|
295,000 |
|
SSARs exercised |
|
|
|
|
SSARs canceled or forfeited |
|
|
(6,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
SSARs outstanding at June 30 |
|
|
704,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSAR price ranges per share: |
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
$ |
21.45 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
23.80-56.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average SSAR exercise prices per share: |
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
$ |
21.45 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
32.52 |
|
Outstanding at June 30 |
|
|
31.09 |
|
At June 30, 2009, the weighted average remaining contractual life of SSARs outstanding was
approximately five years. As of June 30, 2009, the total compensation cost related to unvested
SSARs not yet recognized was approximately $4.8 million, and the weighted-average period over which
it is expected to be recognized is approximately three years.
The following table sets forth the exercise price range, number of shares, weighted average
exercise price, and remaining contractual lives by groups of similar price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSARs Outstanding |
|
SSARs Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Weighted |
|
Exercisable |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
as of |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Contractual Life |
|
Exercise |
|
June 30, |
|
Exercise |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
(Years) |
|
Price |
|
2009 |
|
Price |
$21.45 $24.61
|
|
|
|
|
422,250 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
22.17 |
|
|
|
86,812 |
|
|
$ |
23.72 |
|
$26.00 $37.38
|
|
|
|
|
177,453 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
37.14 |
|
|
|
78,063 |
|
|
$ |
37.38 |
|
$51.82 $66.20
|
|
|
|
|
104,338 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
56.92 |
|
|
|
26,225 |
|
|
$ |
57.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
704,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,100 |
|
|
$ |
33.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of SSARs vested during the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $1.6
million. There were 512,941 SSARs that were not vested as of June 30, 2009. The total intrinsic
value of outstanding and exercisable SSARs as of June 30, 2009 was $2.9 million and $0.5 million,
respectively.
Director Restricted Stock Grants
The 2006 Plan provides for annual restricted stock grants of the Companys common stock to all
non-employee directors. The shares are restricted as to transferability for a period of three
years, but are not subject to forfeiture. In the event a director departs from the Companys Board
of Directors, the non-transferability period would expire immediately. The plan allows for the
director to have the option of forfeiting a portion of the shares awarded in lieu of a cash payment
contributed to the participants tax withholding to satisfy the statutory minimum federal, state
and employment taxes which would be payable at the time of grant. The April 23, 2009 grant equated
to 38,130 shares of common stock, of which 26,388 shares of common stock were issued, after shares
were withheld for withholding taxes. The Company recorded stock compensation expense of
approximately $0.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009 associated with these
grants.
10
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
As of June 30, 2009, of the 5.0 million shares reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan,
approximately 0.9 million shares were available for grant, assuming the maximum number of shares
are earned related to the performance award grants discussed above.
Stock Option Plan
There have been no grants under the Companys Option Plan since 2002, and the Company does not
intend to make any grants under the Option Plan in the future. All of the Companys outstanding
stock options are fully vested. Stock option transactions during the six months ended June 30,
2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding and exercisable at January 1 |
|
|
53,600 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
Options canceled or forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding and exercisable at June 30 |
|
|
52,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options available for grant at June 30 |
|
|
1,935,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option price ranges per share: |
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
$ |
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
11.00-15.12 |
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average option exercise prices per share: |
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
$ |
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
11.89 |
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30 |
|
|
14.82 |
|
At June 30, 2009, the outstanding and exercisable options had a weighted average remaining
contractual life of approximately two years and an aggregate intrinsic value of approximately $0.7
million.
The following table sets forth the exercise price range, number of shares, weighted average
exercise price and remaining contractual lives by groups of similar price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding and Exercisable |
|
|
as of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
Contractual Life |
|
Exercise |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Shares |
|
(Years) |
|
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$10.06 $11.63 |
|
|
13,900 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
11.51 |
|
$15.12 $20.85 |
|
|
38,425 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
16.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2009 was
less than $0.1 million. Cash received from stock option exercises was less than $0.1 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009. The Company realized an insignificant tax benefit from the exercise of
these options.
11
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
5. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Changes in the carrying amount of acquired intangible assets during the six months ended June
30, 2009 are summarized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Customer |
|
|
Patents and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames |
|
|
Relationships |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross carrying amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
33.2 |
|
|
$ |
88.4 |
|
|
$ |
52.9 |
|
|
$ |
174.5 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
33.3 |
|
|
$ |
96.5 |
|
|
$ |
53.2 |
|
|
$ |
183.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Customer |
|
|
Patents and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames |
|
|
Relationships |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
Total |
|
Accumulated amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
45.4 |
|
|
$ |
38.2 |
|
|
$ |
92.0 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
|
$ |
54.3 |
|
|
$ |
42.0 |
|
|
$ |
105.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks |
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
Tradenames |
|
Unamortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
94.4 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
94.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2009 are
summarized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
|
South |
|
|
Europe/Africa/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
America |
|
|
America |
|
|
Middle East |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
141.6 |
|
|
$ |
442.3 |
|
|
$ |
587.0 |
|
Adjustments related to income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
167.6 |
|
|
$ |
439.4 |
|
|
$ |
610.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis and more often if indications of
impairment exist. The Company conducts its annual impairment analyses as of October 1 each fiscal
year.
The Company amortizes certain acquired intangible assets primarily on a straight-line basis
over their estimated useful lives, which range from three to 30 years.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company reduced goodwill by approximately $4.6
million related to the realization of tax benefits associated with excess tax basis deductible
goodwill resulting from its acquisition of Valtra.
12
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
6. INDEBTEDNESS
Indebtedness consisted of the following at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
67/8% Senior subordinated notes due 2014 |
|
$ |
280.7 |
|
|
$ |
279.4 |
|
13/4% Convertible senior subordinated notes due 2033 |
|
|
189.1 |
|
|
|
185.3 |
|
11/4% Convertible senior subordinated notes due 2036 |
|
|
163.9 |
|
|
|
160.3 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633.8 |
|
|
|
625.1 |
|
Less: Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
13/4% Convertible senior subordinated notes due 2033 |
|
|
(189.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness, less current portion |
|
$ |
444.6 |
|
|
$ |
625.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys $201.3 million of 13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes due December 31,
2033 issued in June 2005 provide for (i) the settlement upon conversion in cash up to the principal
amount of the notes with any excess conversion value settled in shares of the Companys common
stock, and (ii) the conversion rate to be increased under certain circumstances if the new notes
are converted in connection with certain change of control transactions occurring prior to December
10, 2010. The notes are unsecured obligations and are convertible into cash and shares of the
Companys common stock upon satisfaction of certain conditions. Interest is payable on the notes
at 13/4% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on June 30 and December 31 of each year.
The notes are convertible into shares of the Companys common stock at an effective price of
$22.36 per share, subject to adjustment. This reflects an initial conversion rate for the notes of
44.7193 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes.
The Companys $201.3 million of 11/4% convertible senior subordinated notes due December 15,
2036 issued in December 2006 provide for (i) the settlement upon conversion in cash up to the
principal amount of the notes with any excess conversion value settled in shares of the Companys
common stock, and (ii) the conversion rate to be increased under certain circumstances if the notes
are converted in connection with certain change of control transactions occurring prior to December
15, 2013. The notes are unsecured obligations and are convertible into cash and shares of the
Companys common stock upon satisfaction of certain conditions. Interest is payable on the notes
at 11/4% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on June 15 and December 15 of each year.
The notes are convertible into shares of the Companys common stock at an effective price of
$40.73 per share, subject to adjustment. This reflects an initial conversion rate for the notes of
24.5525 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes.
In accordance with the provisions of FSP APB 14-1, prior periods have been retroactively
restated, which resulted in an adjustment of the following amounts (in millions, except per share
amounts):
13
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet |
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
as of December 31, 2008 |
|
Reported |
|
Adjustment |
|
As adjusted |
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
$ |
682.0 |
|
|
$ |
(57.0 |
) |
|
$ |
625.0 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
$ |
973.2 |
|
|
$ |
94.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,067.4 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
$ |
1,419.3 |
|
|
$ |
(37.2 |
) |
|
$ |
1,382.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
Net income attributable to AGCO
and subsidiaries |
|
$ |
133.1 |
|
|
$ |
(3.5 |
) |
|
$ |
129.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share
attributable to AGCO and subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
Net income attributable to AGCO
and subsidiaries |
|
$ |
195.4 |
|
|
$ |
(7.0 |
) |
|
$ |
188.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share
attributable to AGCO and subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.97 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
The following table sets forth as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 the carrying amount of the
equity component, the principal amount of the liability component, the unamortized discount and the
net carrying amount of the Companys 13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes and its 11/4%
convertible senior subordinated notes (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
13/4% Convertible senior subordinated notes due 2033: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount of the equity component |
|
$ |
39.9 |
|
|
$ |
39.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount of the liability component |
|
$ |
201.3 |
|
|
$ |
201.3 |
|
Less: unamortized discount |
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
189.1 |
|
|
$ |
185.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/4% Convertible senior subordinated notes due 2036: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount of the equity component |
|
$ |
54.3 |
|
|
$ |
54.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount of the liability component |
|
$ |
201.3 |
|
|
$ |
201.3 |
|
Less: unamortized discount |
|
|
(37.4 |
) |
|
|
(41.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
163.9 |
|
|
$ |
160.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
The following table sets forth the interest expense recognized relating to both the
contractual interest coupon and the amortization of the discount on the liability component for the
13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes and 11/4% convertible senior subordinated notes (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
13/4% Convertible senior subordinated notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/4% Convertible senior subordinated notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective interest rate on the liability component for the 13/4% convertible senior
subordinated notes and the 11/4% convertible senior subordinated notes for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was 6.1% for both notes. The unamortized discount for the 13/4%
convertible senior subordinated notes and the 11/4% convertible senior subordinated notes will be
amortized through December 2010 and December 2013, respectively, as these are the earliest dates
the notes holders can require the Company to repurchase the notes.
Holders of the Companys 13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes and its 11/4% convertible
senior subordinated notes may convert the notes, if, during any fiscal quarter, the closing sales
price of the Companys common stock exceeds 120% of the conversion price of $22.36 per share for
the 13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes and $40.73 per share for the 11/4% convertible senior
subordinated notes for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the
last trading day of the preceding fiscal quarter. As of June 30, 2009, the closing sales price of
the Companys common stock had exceeded 120% of the conversion price of the 13/4% convertible senior
subordinated notes for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading days ending June 30,
2009, and, therefore, the Company classified the notes as a current liability. In association with
FSP APB 14-1, and in accordance with FASB Topic No. D-98, Classification and Measurement of
Redeemable Securities, the Company also classified the equity component of the 13/4% convertible
senior subordinated notes as temporary equity. The amount classified as temporary equity was
measured as the excess of (a) the amount of cash that would be required to be paid upon conversion
over (b) the current carrying amount of the liability-classified component. Future classification
of both notes between current and long-term debt and classification of the equity component of both
notes as temporary equity is dependent on the closing sales price of the Companys common stock
during future quarters. The Company believes it is unlikely the holders of the notes would convert
the notes under the provisions of the indenture agreement, thereby requiring the Company to repay
the principal portion in cash. In the event the notes were converted, the Company believes it
could repay the notes with available cash on hand, funds from the Companys $300.0 million
multi-currency revolving credit facility, or a combination of these sources.
At June 30, 2009,
the estimated fair values of the Companys 67/8% senior subordinated notes,
13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes and 11/4% convertible senior subordinated notes, based on
their listed market values, were $275.8 million, $277.7 million and $177.1 million, respectively,
compared to their carrying values of $280.7 million, $189.1 million and $163.9 million,
respectively. At December 31, 2008, the estimated fair values of the Companys 67/8% senior
subordinated notes, 13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes and 11/4% convertible senior
subordinated notes, based on their listed market values, were $171.5 million, $230.4 million and
$145.4 million, respectively, compared to their carrying values of $279.4 million, $185.3 million
and $160.3 million, respectively.
The Company is selling certain export accounts receivables in Brazil to various financial
institutions under a special export financing program. These facilities do not meet the criteria
for off-balance sheet
15
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
treatment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities a Replacement of FASB Statement
No. 125 (SFAS No. 140). The amounts received and outstanding from these facilities as of June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were approximately $41.5 million and $42.4 million, respectively,
and are included in Other current liabilities within the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
7. INVENTORIES
Inventories at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
650.9 |
|
|
$ |
484.9 |
|
Repair and replacement parts |
|
|
385.4 |
|
|
|
396.1 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
116.7 |
|
|
|
130.5 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
290.0 |
|
|
|
378.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
1,443.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,389.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. PRODUCT WARRANTY
The warranty reserve activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
179.1 |
|
|
$ |
188.7 |
|
|
$ |
183.4 |
|
|
$ |
167.1 |
|
Accruals for warranties issued during the period |
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
|
|
|
89.0 |
|
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period |
|
|
(33.9 |
) |
|
|
(29.5 |
) |
|
|
(63.0 |
) |
|
|
(59.8 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30 |
|
$ |
190.4 |
|
|
$ |
206.8 |
|
|
$ |
190.4 |
|
|
$ |
206.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys agricultural equipment products are generally warranted against defects in
material and workmanship for a period of one to four years. The Company accrues for future
warranty costs at the time of sale based on historical warranty experience. Approximately $169.5
million and $164.3 million of warranty reserves are included in Accrued expenses in the Companys
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Approximately $20.9 million and $19.1 million of warranty reserves are included in Other
noncurrent liabilities in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively.
9. NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
The computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for earnings per share are presented
in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per common share is computed
by dividing net income attributable to AGCO Corporation and its subsidiaries by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per common share
assumes exercise of outstanding stock options, vesting of performance share awards, vesting of
restricted stock and the appreciation of the excess conversion value of the contingently
convertible senior subordinated notes using the treasury stock method when the effects of such
assumptions are dilutive.
Dilution of weighted shares outstanding will depend on the Companys stock price for the
excess conversion value of the convertible senior subordinated notes using the treasury stock
method.
16
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
A reconciliation of net income attributable to AGCO Corporation and its subsidiaries and weighted
average common shares outstanding for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (in millions, except per
share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Basic net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to AGCO
Corporation and subsidiaries |
|
$ |
57.4 |
|
|
$ |
129.6 |
|
|
$ |
91.1 |
|
|
$ |
188.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding |
|
|
92.3 |
|
|
|
91.7 |
|
|
|
92.1 |
|
|
|
91.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share attributable to
AGCO Corporation and subsidiaries |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to AGCO
Corporation and subsidiaries for
purposes of computing diluted
net income per share |
|
$ |
57.4 |
|
|
$ |
129.6 |
|
|
$ |
91.1 |
|
|
$ |
188.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding |
|
|
92.3 |
|
|
|
91.7 |
|
|
|
92.1 |
|
|
|
91.7 |
|
Dilutive stock options, performance
share awards and restricted stock
awards |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Weighted average assumed conversion of
contingently convertible senior
subordinated notes |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common and
common equivalent shares outstanding
for purposes of computing diluted
earnings per share |
|
|
93.8 |
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
|
|
92.9 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share attributable to
AGCO Corporation and subsidiaries |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were SSARs to purchase approximately 0.6 million shares of the Companys common stock
for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and approximately 0.1 million shares of the
Companys common stock for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 that were excluded
from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they had an antidilutive impact.
10. INCOME TAXES
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had approximately $22.9 million and $20.1
million, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits, all of which would impact the Companys
effective tax rate if recognized. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had
approximately $10.2 million and $7.6 million, respectively, of current accrued taxes related to
uncertain income tax positions connected with ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions. The
Company accrues interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its provision for
income taxes. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had accrued interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits of $2.2 million and $1.8 million, respectively.
17
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
The tax years 2002 through 2008 remain open to examination by taxing authorities in the United
States and certain other foreign taxing jurisdictions.
11. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company applies the provisions of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133), as amended by SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain
Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.
All derivatives are recognized on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair
value. On the date the derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the derivative
as either (1) a fair value hedge of a recognized liability, (2) a cash flow hedge of a forecasted
transaction, (3) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, or (4) a non-designated
derivative instrument.
The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items,
as well as the risk management objectives and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions.
The Company formally assesses, both at the hedges inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the
derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in
fair values or cash flow of hedged items. When it is determined that a derivative is no longer
highly effective as a hedge, hedge accounting is discontinued on a prospective basis.
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company has significant manufacturing operations in the United States, France, Germany,
Finland and Brazil, and it purchases a portion of its tractors, combines and components from
third-party foreign suppliers, primarily in various European countries and in Japan. The Company
also sells products in over 140 countries throughout the world. The Companys most significant
transactional foreign currency exposures are the Euro, Brazilian real, and the Canadian dollar in
relation to the United States dollar and the Euro in relation to the British pound.
The Company attempts to manage its transactional foreign exchange exposure by hedging foreign
currency cash flow forecasts and commitments arising from the anticipated settlement of receivables
and payables and from future purchases and sales. Where naturally offsetting currency positions do
not occur, the Company hedges certain, but not all, of its exposures through the use of foreign
currency option and forward contracts. The Companys translation exposure resulting from
translating the financial statements of foreign subsidiaries into United States dollars is not
hedged. When practical, the translation impact is reduced by financing local operations with local
borrowings.
The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge receivables and payables on the
Company and its subsidiaries balance sheets that are denominated in foreign currencies other than
the functional currency. These forward contracts are classified as non-designated derivative
instruments.
The foreign currency option and forward contracts fair value measurements fall within the
Level 2 fair value hierarchy under SFAS No. 157. Level 2 fair value measurements are generally
based upon quoted market prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for
identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in
which all significant inputs or significant value-drivers are observable in active markets. The
fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is based on a valuation model that discounts cash
flows resulting from the differential between the contract price and the market-based forward rate.
The fair value of foreign currency option contracts is based on a valuation model that utilizes
spot and forward exchange rates, interest rates and currency pair volatility.
18
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
The Companys senior management establishes the Companys foreign currency and interest rate
risk management policies. These policies are reviewed periodically by the Audit Committee of the
Companys Board of Directors. The policy allows for the use of derivative instruments to hedge
exposures to movements in foreign currency and interest rates. The Companys policy prohibits the
use of derivative instruments for speculative purposes.
Cash Flow Hedges
During 2009 and 2008, the Company designated certain foreign currency option and forward
contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted sales. The effective portion of the fair
value gains or losses on these cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss)
and subsequently reclassified into cost of goods sold during the period the sales are recognized.
These amounts offset the effect of the changes in foreign exchange
rates on the related sale transactions. There was no ineffective portion of outstanding derivatives as of June 30,
2009. The amount of the (loss) gain recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) that was
reclassified to cost of goods sold during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was
approximately ($13.5) million and $11.1 million, respectively, on an after-tax basis. The
outstanding contracts as of June 30, 2009 range in maturity through December 2009.
The following table summarizes activity in accumulated other comprehensive income related to
derivatives held by the Company during the six months ended June 30, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before-Tax |
|
|
Income |
|
|
After-Tax |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Amount |
|
Accumulated derivative net losses as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
(54.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(17.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(36.7 |
) |
Net changes in fair value of derivatives |
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
Net losses reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) into income |
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated derivative net losses as of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
(6.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had outstanding foreign exchange contracts with a notional
amount of approximately $153.0 million that were entered into to hedge forecasted sale
transactions.
Derivative Transactions Not Designated as Hedging Instruments Under SFAS No. 133
During 2009 and 2008, the Company entered into forward contracts to hedge receivables and
payables on the Company and its subsidiaries balance sheets that are denominated in foreign
currencies other than the functional currency. These forward contracts were not designated as
hedging instruments under SFAS No. 133 and were classified as non-designated derivative
instruments.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts with a
notional amount of approximately $891.5 million that were entered into to hedge receivables and
payables that are denominated in foreign currencies other than the functional currency. These
contracts were classified as non-designated derivative instruments and changes in the fair value of
these contracts are reported in other expense, net. For the three months and six months ended June
30, 2009, the Company recorded a net loss of approximately $40.6 million and $97.6 million,
respectively, related to these forward contracts. Gains and losses on such contracts are
historically substantially offset by losses and gains on the remeasurement of the underlying asset
or liability being hedged.
19
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
The table below sets forth the fair value of derivative instruments as of June 30, 2009 (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
|
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
Derivative instruments designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS No. 133: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS No. 133: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty Risk
The Company generally has not required collateral from counterparties, nor has the Company
historically been asked to post collateral with respect to hedging transactions, with the following
exception. During 2009 and 2008, the Company deposited cash with a financial institution as
security against outstanding foreign exchange contracts that mature throughout 2009. As of June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the amount deposited was approximately $7.3 million and $33.8
million, respectively, and was classified as Restricted cash in the Companys Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amount posted as security will either increase or decrease in the
future depending on the value of the outstanding amount of contracts secured under the arrangement
and the relative impact on gains (losses) on the outstanding contracts.
The Company does not have any agreements with contingent features that require the Company to
post collateral if there is a change in the credit rating of the Company by the credit rating
agencies.
The Company monitors the counterparty risk and credit ratings of all the counterparties
regularly. The Company believes that its exposures are appropriately diversified across
counterparties and that these counterparties are creditworthy financial institutions. If the
Company perceives any risk with a counterparty, then the Company would cease to do business with
that counterparty. There have been no negative impacts to the Company from any non-performance of
any counterparties.
20
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
12. CHANGES IN EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The
following table sets forth changes in equity attributed to AGCO
Corporation and its
subsidiaries and to noncontrolling interests for the six months ended June 30, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGCO Corporation and subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,067.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,382.1 |
|
|
$ |
(436.1 |
) |
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,020.0 |
|
Stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
Issuance of performance award stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
Reclassification to temporary equity
Equity component of convertible senior
subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
Investments by noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
91.3 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
198.7 |
|
Defined benefit pension plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives held by
affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,058.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,473.2 |
|
|
$ |
(202.3 |
) |
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,337.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGCO Corporation and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
subsidiaries |
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
57.4 |
|
|
$ |
129.6 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
242.9 |
|
|
|
81.6 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit pension plans |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives held
by affiliates |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
322.0 |
|
|
$ |
218.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGCO Corporation and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
subsidiaries |
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
91.1 |
|
|
$ |
188.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
198.4 |
|
|
|
161.7 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Defined benefit pension plans |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives |
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives held
by affiliates |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
324.9 |
|
|
$ |
360.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
13. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SECURITIZATION
At June 30, 2009, the Company had accounts receivable securitization facilities in the United
States, Canada and Europe totaling approximately $490.4 million. Under the securitization
facilities, wholesale accounts receivable are sold on a revolving basis to commercial paper
conduits either through a wholly-owned special purpose United States subsidiary or a QSPE in the
United Kingdom. The Company accounts for its securitization facilities and its wholly-owned
special purpose United States subsidiary in accordance with SFAS No. 140 and FIN 46(R). Due to the
fact that the receivables sold to the commercial paper conduits are an insignificant portion of the
conduits total asset portfolios and such receivables are not siloed, consolidation is not
appropriate under FIN 46(R), as the Company does not absorb a majority of losses under such
transactions. In Europe, the commercial paper conduit that purchases a majority of the receivables
is deemed to be the majority beneficial interest holder of the QSPE, and, thus, consolidation by
the Company is not appropriate under FIN 46(R), as the Company does not absorb a majority of losses
under such transactions. In addition, these facilities are accounted for as off-balance sheet
transactions in accordance with SFAS No. 140.
Outstanding funding under these facilities totaled approximately $482.2 million at June 30,
2009 and $483.2 million at December 31, 2008. The funded balance has the effect of reducing
accounts receivable and short-term liabilities by the same amount. Losses on sales of receivables
primarily from securitization facilities included in other expense, net were $5.2 million and $8.3
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $10.2 million and
$14.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The losses are
determined by calculating the estimated present value of receivables sold compared to their
carrying amount. The present value is based on historical collection experience and a discount
rate representing the spread over LIBOR as prescribed under the terms of the agreements.
The Company continues to service the receivables sold and maintains a retained interest in the
receivables. No servicing asset or liability has been recorded as the estimated fair value of the
servicing of the receivables approximates the servicing income. The retained interest in the
receivables sold is included in the caption Accounts and notes receivable, net within the
Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Companys risk of loss under the
securitization facilities is limited to a portion of the unfunded balance of receivables sold,
which is approximately 15% of the funded amount.
The Company maintains reserves for the portion of the residual interest it estimates is
uncollectible. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the fair value of the retained interest was
approximately $167.6 million and $81.4 million, respectively. The retained interest fair value measurement falls
within the Level 3 fair value hierarchy under SFAS No. 157. Level 3 measurements are model-derived
valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value-drivers are unobservable.
The fair value was based upon calculating the estimated present value of the retained interest
using a discount rate representing a spread over LIBOR and other key assumptions, such as
historical collection experience. The following table summarizes the activity with respect to the
fair value of the Companys retained interest in receivables sold during the six months ended June
30, 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
81.4 |
|
Realized losses |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Purchases, issuances and settlements |
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
167.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
22
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
14. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Net pension and postretirement cost for the Companys defined pension and postretirement
benefit plans for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are set forth below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Pension benefits |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
Interest cost |
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial
loss and prior service cost |
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension cost |
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement cost |
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension and postretirement cost for the Companys defined pension and postretirement
benefit plans for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are set forth below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Pension benefits |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
Interest cost |
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(13.8 |
) |
|
|
(22.6 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial
loss and prior service cost |
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension cost |
$ |
11.5 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement cost |
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, approximately $14.1 million of contributions had
been made to the Companys defined benefit pension plans. The Company currently estimates its
minimum contributions for 2009 to its defined benefit pension plans will aggregate approximately
$29.4 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company made approximately $0.9
million of contributions to its U.S.-based postretirement health care and life insurance benefit
plans. The Company currently estimates that it will make approximately $2.0 million of
contributions to its U.S.-based postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans during
2009.
23
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
15. SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company has four reportable segments: North America; South America; Europe/Africa/Middle
East; and Asia/Pacific. Each regional segment distributes a full range of agricultural equipment
and related replacement parts. The Company evaluates segment performance primarily based on income
from operations. Sales for each regional segment are based on the location of the third-party
customer. The Companys selling, general and administrative expenses and engineering expenses are
charged to each segment based on the region and division where the expenses are incurred. As a
result, the components of income from operations for one segment may not be comparable to another
segment. Segment results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and assets as
of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe/Africa/ |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
North |
|
South |
|
Middle |
|
Asia/ |
|
|
June 30, |
|
America |
|
America |
|
East |
|
Pacific |
|
Consolidated |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
445.8 |
|
|
$ |
226.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,069.5 |
|
|
$ |
53.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,795.2 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
81.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
110.6 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
465.7 |
|
|
$ |
381.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,484.8 |
|
|
$ |
63.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,395.4 |
|
(Loss) income from operations |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
175.4 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
218.5 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe/Africa/ |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
North |
|
South |
|
Middle |
|
Asia/ |
|
|
June 30, |
|
America |
|
America |
|
East |
|
Pacific |
|
Consolidated |
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
839.1 |
|
|
$ |
406.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,035.4 |
|
|
$ |
93.3 |
|
|
$ |
3,374.2 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
158.7 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
201.3 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
58.2 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
69.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
833.4 |
|
|
$ |
702.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,530.3 |
|
|
$ |
115.8 |
|
|
$ |
4,182.0 |
|
(Loss) income from operations |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
70.9 |
|
|
|
272.8 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
343.1 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
63.5 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
789.6 |
|
|
$ |
522.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,779.1 |
|
|
$ |
139.9 |
|
|
$ |
3,231.3 |
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
685.0 |
|
|
|
489.2 |
|
|
|
1,751.0 |
|
|
|
86.6 |
|
|
|
3,011.8 |
|
A reconciliation from the segment information to the consolidated balances for income from
operations and total assets is set forth below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Segment income from operations |
|
$ |
110.6 |
|
|
$ |
218.5 |
|
|
$ |
201.3 |
|
|
$ |
343.1 |
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
|
|
(15.9 |
) |
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
|
(34.9 |
) |
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
Restructuring and other infrequent expenses |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income from operations |
|
$ |
77.8 |
|
|
$ |
189.1 |
|
|
$ |
136.4 |
|
|
$ |
283.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Segment assets |
|
$ |
3,231.3 |
|
|
$ |
3,011.8 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
190.2 |
|
|
|
512.2 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
Receivables from affiliates |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
306.6 |
|
|
|
275.1 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
84.6 |
|
|
|
86.5 |
|
Other current and noncurrent assets |
|
|
277.0 |
|
|
|
266.7 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
172.0 |
|
|
|
176.9 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
610.1 |
|
|
|
587.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets |
|
$ |
4,886.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,954.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Guarantees
At June 30, 2009, the Company was obligated under certain circumstances to purchase through
the year 2010 up to $0.9 million of equipment upon expiration of certain operating leases between
AGCO Finance LLC and AGCO Finance Canada Ltd., the Companys retail finance joint ventures in North
America, and end users. The Company also maintains a remarketing agreement with these joint
ventures, whereby the Company is obligated to repurchase repossessed inventory at market values.
The Company has an agreement with AGCO Finance LLC which limits the Companys purchase obligations
under this arrangement to $6.0 million in the aggregate per calendar year. The Company believes
that any losses that might be incurred on the resale of this equipment will not materially impact
the Companys financial position or results of operations, due to the fair value of the underlying
equipment.
At June 30, 2009, the Company guaranteed indebtedness owed to third parties of approximately
$51.1 million, primarily related to dealer and end user financing of equipment. Such guarantees
generally obligate the Company to repay outstanding finance obligations owed to financial
institutions if dealers or end users default on such loans through 2014. The Company believes the
credit risk associated with these guarantees is not material to its financial position. Losses
under such guarantees have historically been insignificant. In addition, the Company would be able
to recover any amounts paid under such guarantees from the sale of the underlying financed farm
equipment, as the fair value of such equipment would be sufficient to offset a substantial portion
of the amounts paid.
Other
Outstanding funding under the Companys accounts receivable securitization facilities totaled
approximately $482.2 million at June 30, 2009 and $483.2 million at December 31, 2008. The
funded balance has the effect of reducing accounts receivable and short-term liabilities by the
same amount and are therefore accounted for as off-balance sheet transactions in accordance with SFAS
No. 140 (Note 13).
The Company sells certain trade receivables under factoring arrangements to financial
institutions throughout the world. The Company evaluates the sale of such receivables pursuant to
the guidelines of SFAS No. 140 and has determined that these facilities should be accounted for as
off-balance sheet transactions in accordance with SFAS No. 140.
25
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Continued
(unaudited)
Legal Claims and Other Matters
As a result of Brazilian tax legislation impacting value added taxes (VAT), the Company has
recorded a reserve of approximately $12.1 million and $13.9 million against its outstanding balance
of Brazilian VAT taxes receivable as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, due to
the uncertainty of the Companys ability to collect the amounts outstanding.
As disclosed in Item 3 of the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, in
February 2006, the Company received a subpoena from the SEC in connection with a non-public,
fact-finding inquiry entitled In the Matter of Certain Participants in the Oil for Food Program.
This subpoena requested documents concerning transactions in Iraq by the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries under the United Nations Oil for Food Program. Subsequently, the Company was
contacted by the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding the same transactions, although no
subpoena or other formal process has been initiated by the DOJ. Other inquiries have been
initiated by the Brazilian, Danish, French and U.K. governments regarding subsidiaries of the
Company. The inquiries arose from sales of approximately $58.0 million in farm equipment to the
Iraq ministry of agriculture between 2000 and 2002. The SECs staff has asserted that certain
aspects of those transactions were not properly recorded in the Companys books and records. The
Company is cooperating fully in these inquiries, and is in discussions with the SEC and DOJ
regarding settlement. Based upon discussions to date, the Company does not expect a settlement
with the SEC and DOJ to have a material impact on its business or financial condition. It is not
possible at this time to predict the outcome of remaining inquiries or their impact, if any, on the
Company; although if the outcomes were adverse, the Company could be required to pay fines and make
other payments as well as take appropriate remedial actions.
On June 27, 2008, the Republic of Iraq filed a civil action in a federal court in New York,
Case No. 08 CIV 59617, naming as defendants three of the Companys foreign subsidiaries that
participated in the United Nations Oil for Food Program. Ninety-one other entities or companies
were also named as defendants in the civil action due to their participation in the United Nations
Oil for Food Program. The complaint purports to assert claims against each of the defendants
seeking damages in an unspecified amount. Although the Companys subsidiaries intend to vigorously
defend against this action, it is not possible at this time to predict the outcome of this action
or its impact, if any, on the Company; although if the outcomes were adverse, the Company could be
required to pay damages.
In August 2008, as part of a routine audit, the Brazilian taxing authorities disallowed
deductions relating to the amortization of certain goodwill recognized in connection with a
reorganization of the Companys Brazilian operations and the related transfer of certain assets to
the Companys Brazilian subsidiaries. The amount of the tax disallowance through June 30, 2009,
not including interest and penalties, was approximately 90.6 million Brazilian reais (or
approximately $46.5 million). The amount ultimately in dispute will be greater because of
interest, penalties and future deductions. The Company has been advised by its legal and tax
advisors that its position with respect to the deductions is allowable under the tax laws of
Brazil. The Company is contesting the disallowance and believes that it is not likely that the
assessment, interest or penalties will be required to be paid. However, the ultimate outcome will
not be determined until the Brazilian tax appeal process is complete, which could take several
years.
The Company is a party to various other legal claims and actions incidental to its business. The
Company believes that none of these claims or actions, either individually or in the aggregate, is
material to its business or financial condition.
26
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
Our operations are subject to the cyclical nature of the agricultural industry. Sales of our
equipment have been and are expected to continue to be affected by changes in net cash farm income,
farm land values, weather conditions, demand for agricultural commodities, commodity prices and
general economic conditions. We record sales when we sell equipment and replacement parts to our
independent dealers, distributors or other customers. To the extent possible, we attempt to sell
products to our dealers and distributors on a level basis throughout the year to reduce the effect
of seasonal demands on manufacturing operations and to minimize our investment in inventory.
Retail sales by dealers to farmers are highly seasonal and are a function of the timing of the
planting and harvesting seasons. As a result, our net sales have historically been the lowest in
the first quarter and have increased in subsequent quarters.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, we generated net income of $57.4 million, or $0.61
per share, compared to net income of $129.6 million, or $1.31 per share, for the same period in
2008. For the first six months of 2009, we generated net income of $91.1 million, or $0.98 per
share, compared to net income of $188.4 million, or $1.90 per share, for the same period in 2008.
Net sales during the second quarter and first six months of 2009 were $1,795.2 million and
$3,374.2 million, respectively, which were approximately 25.1% and 19.3% lower than the second
quarter and first six months of 2008, respectively, primarily due to sales decreases in most of our
geographical segments as well as the unfavorable impact of currency translation.
Income from operations during the second quarter of 2009 was $77.8 million compared to
$189.1 million in the second quarter of 2008. Income from operations was $136.4 million for the
first six months of 2009 compared to $283.3 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease in
income from operations during the second quarter and first six months of 2009 was primarily due to
decreased net sales, lower gross margins and unfavorable currency translation impacts.
Income from operations decreased in our Europe/Africa/Middle East region in the second quarter
and first six months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008 primarily due to decreased net
sales, lower production levels, unfavorable currency translation impacts and increased engineering
expenses. In the South America region, income from operations decreased in the second quarter and
first six months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008 primarily due to lower net sales,
significantly lower production levels, unfavorable currency translation impacts and a shift in
sales mix from higher horsepower tractors to lower horsepower tractors in Brazil. Income from
operations in North America was higher in the second quarter and first six months of 2009 compared
to the same periods in 2008 primarily due to the introduction of new products, reduced warranty
expense, cost control initiatives and positive currency translation impacts on imported products
sold in North America, partially offset by
higher levels of engineering costs. Income from operations in our Asia/Pacific region
decreased in the second quarter and first six months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008
due to lower gross margins and unfavorable currency translation impacts.
27
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
Retail Sales
In North America, industry unit retail sales of tractors for the first six months of 2009
decreased approximately 22% compared to the first six months of 2008 resulting from decreases in
industry unit retail sales of compact, utility and high horsepower tractors. Weakened conditions
in residential construction and livestock production have significantly reduced demand for compact
and utility tractors. Industry unit retail sales of combines for the first six months of 2009 were
approximately 30% higher than the prior year period. Our North American unit retail sales of
tractors and combines were lower in the first six months of 2009 compared to the first six months
of 2008.
In Europe, industry unit retail sales of tractors for the first six months of 2009 decreased
approximately 13% compared to the first six months of 2008 due to lower retail volumes in all major
European markets, except France. Industry unit retail sales were weakest in Central and Eastern
Europe, Russia, Scandinavia and Spain. The tightened credit environment, especially in the markets
of Eastern Europe and Russia, and decreased farm incomes in Western Europe contributed to decreased
industry demand. Our European unit retail sales of tractors for the first six months of 2009 were
lower when compared to the first six months of 2008.
South American industry unit retail sales of tractors in the first six months of 2009
decreased approximately 25% over the prior year period. Industry unit retail sales of combines for
the first six months of 2009 were approximately 48% lower than the prior year period. Dry weather
conditions and limited credit availability in South America and their impact on planted acreage and
crop production contributed to the overall decrease in South American industry demand. Industry
unit retail sales of tractors in the major market of Brazil decreased approximately 6% during the
first six months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. A Brazilian government-funded
financing program for small tractors has increased small tractor sales which have partially offset
significant declines in sales of high horsepower tractors in the professional farming segment.
Industry unit retail sales of tractors in Argentina decreased approximately 58% during the first
six months of 2009 compared to the prior year period. Our South American unit retail sales of
tractors and combines were lower in the first six months of 2009 compared to the same period in
2008.
Outside of North America, Europe and South America, our net sales for the first six months of
2009 increased approximately 1.7% compared to the prior year period. Stronger sales in Australia
and Africa, which both benefited from increased rainfall, were partially offset by lower sales in
Asia.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Net sales for the second quarter of 2009 were $1,795.2 million compared to $2,395.4 million
for the same period in 2008. Net sales for the first six months of 2009 were $3,374.2 million
compared to $4,182.0 million for the prior year period. Foreign currency translation negatively
impacted net sales by approximately $259.6 million, or 10.8%, in the second quarter of 2009 and by
$518.8 million, or 12.4%, in the first six months of 2009. The following table sets forth, for the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, the impact to net sales of currency translation by geographical segment (in
millions, except percentages):
28
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change due to currency |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
translation |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
North America |
|
$ |
445.8 |
|
|
$ |
465.7 |
|
|
$ |
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
)% |
|
$ |
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
)% |
South America |
|
|
226.9 |
|
|
|
381.1 |
|
|
|
(154.2 |
) |
|
|
(40.5 |
)% |
|
|
(55.2 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
)% |
Europe/Africa/Middle
East |
|
|
1,069.5 |
|
|
|
1,484.8 |
|
|
|
(415.3 |
) |
|
|
(28.0 |
)% |
|
|
(176.1 |
) |
|
|
(11.9 |
)% |
Asia/Pacific |
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
|
63.8 |
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
(16.8 |
)% |
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
(16.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,795.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,395.4 |
|
|
$ |
(600.2 |
) |
|
|
(25.1 |
)% |
|
$ |
(259.6 |
) |
|
|
(10.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change due to currency |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
translation |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
North America |
|
$ |
839.1 |
|
|
$ |
833.4 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
$ |
(38.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
)% |
South America |
|
|
406.4 |
|
|
|
702.5 |
|
|
|
(296.1 |
) |
|
|
(42.2 |
)% |
|
|
(111.7 |
) |
|
|
(15.9 |
)% |
Europe/Africa/Middle
East |
|
|
2,035.4 |
|
|
|
2,530.3 |
|
|
|
(494.9 |
) |
|
|
(19.6 |
)% |
|
|
(346.8 |
) |
|
|
(13.7 |
)% |
Asia/Pacific |
|
|
93.3 |
|
|
|
115.8 |
|
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
|
|
(19.4 |
)% |
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
|
|
(18.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,374.2 |
|
|
$ |
4,182.0 |
|
|
$ |
(807.8 |
) |
|
|
(19.3 |
)% |
|
$ |
(518.8 |
) |
|
|
(12.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regionally, net sales in North America decreased during the second quarter of 2009 and
increased during the first six months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. Increased
sales of high horsepower tractors, balers and implements were offset by weaker sales of lower
horsepower tractors. In the Europe/Africa/Middle East region, net sales decreased in the second
quarter and first six months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008 primarily due to
decreased sales in Eastern and Central Europe, Russia, Scandinavia and Spain, partially offset by
modest growth in Germany and France. Net sales in South America decreased during the second
quarter and first six months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008 as a result of weaker
market conditions and a shift in sales mix to lower horsepower tractors in the region. In the
Asia/Pacific region, net sales decreased in the second quarter and first six months of 2009
compared to the same periods in 2008 primarily due to sales declines in Asia. We estimate that
worldwide average price increases during the second quarter and the first six months of 2009 were
approximately 3.4% and 4.1%, respectively. Consolidated net sales of tractors and combines, which
comprised approximately 71% and 70% of our net sales in the second quarter and first six months of
2009, respectively, decreased approximately 27% and 22% in the second quarter and first six months
of 2009, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2008. Unit sales of tractors and combines
decreased approximately 24% and 17% during the second quarter and first six months of 2009,
respectively, compared to the same periods in 2008. The difference between the unit sales decrease
and the decrease in net sales was primarily the result of foreign currency translation, pricing and
sales mix changes.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage relationship to net
sales of certain items in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in millions, except
percentages):
29
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net sales(1) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net sales |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
291.5 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
$ |
428.2 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
154.2 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
181.0 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
Engineering expenses |
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Restructuring and other infrequent expenses |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
77.8 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
$ |
189.1 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net sales(1) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net sales |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
563.8 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
$ |
743.4 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
315.8 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
351.6 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
Engineering expenses |
|
|
100.1 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
98.4 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Restructuring and other infrequent expenses |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
136.4 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
283.3 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rounding may impact summation of certain amounts. |
Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased during the second quarter and the first
six months of 2009 compared to the prior year primarily due to lower production volumes and a
weaker sales mix, partially offset by reduced workforce levels and cost control initiatives. Sales
mix impacted margins primarily in South America due to a shift in demand to low horsepower tractors
away from high horsepower tractors and combines. Unit production of tractors and combines during
the second quarter and first six months of 2009 was approximately 35% and 21% lower, respectively,
than the comparable periods in 2008. Production in the second half of the year is expected to
remain significantly below 2008 levels, which will negatively impact sales and gross margins for
the remainder of the year compared to 2008. We recorded approximately $0.0 million and $0.5
million of stock compensation expense, within cost of goods sold, during the second quarter and
first six months of 2009, respectively, compared to $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of
stock compensation expense for the comparable periods in 2008, as is more fully explained in Note 4
to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses as a percentage of net sales increased
during the second quarter and first six months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008
primarily due to the decline in net sales. Engineering expenses increased during the first six
months of 2009 compared to the prior year period primarily due to higher spending to fund new
products and product improvements. We recorded approximately $2.3 million and $8.2 million of
stock compensation expense, within SG&A, during the second quarter and first six months of 2009, respectively, compared to $8.4 million
and $14.8 million, respectively, of stock compensation expense for the comparable periods in 2008,
as is more fully explained in Note 4 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
We recorded restructuring and other infrequent expenses of approximately $2.8 million during
the first six months of 2009, primarily related to severance and other related costs associated
with the rationalization of our operations in the United States, the United Kingdom and Finland. We
recorded
30
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
restructuring and other infrequent expenses of approximately $0.2 million during the first
six months of 2008, primarily related to severance costs associated with the rationalization of our
Valtra sales office located in France. See Note 3 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for further discussion of restructuring activities.
Interest expense, net was $11.7 million and $23.4 million for the second quarter and first six
months of 2009, respectively, compared to $9.0 million and $17.6 million, respectively, for the
comparable periods in 2008. The increase was primarily due to increased utilization of export
financing lines in Brazil.
Other expense, net was $8.3 million and $14.8 million during the second quarter and first six
months of 2009, respectively, compared to $9.6 million and $15.6 million, respectively, for the
same periods in 2008. Losses on sales of receivables, primarily under our securitization
facilities, were $5.2 million and $10.2 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2009,
respectively, compared to $8.3 million and $14.5 million, respectively, for the same periods in
2008. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in interest rates in 2009 compared to 2008.
In addition, there were foreign exchange losses in the second quarter and first six months of 2009
compared to foreign exchange gains in the same periods in 2008.
We recorded an income tax provision of $14.4 million and $28.8 million for the second quarter
and first six months of 2009, respectively, compared to $55.5 million and $85.3 million,
respectively, for the comparable periods in 2008. The effective tax rate was 24.9% and 29.3% for
the second quarter and first six months of 2009, respectively, compared to 32.6% and 34.1%,
respectively, in the comparable prior year periods. Our effective tax rate was lower in the second
quarter and first six months of 2009, primarily due to improvement in the performance of our
operations in the United States in 2009 for which no tax provision or benefit is being recorded.
Equity in net earnings of affiliates was $13.6 million for the second quarter of 2009 compared
to $14.6 million for the comparable period in 2008. For the first six months of 2009, equity in
net earnings from affiliates was approximately $21.9 million compared to $23.6 million for the same
period in 2008.
RETAIL FINANCE JOINT VENTURES
Our AGCO Finance retail finance joint ventures provide retail financing and wholesale
financing to our dealers in the United States, Canada, Brazil, Germany, France, the United Kingdom,
Australia, Ireland, Austria and Argentina. The joint ventures are owned 49% by AGCO and 51% by a
wholly owned subsidiary of Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. (Rabobank), a AAA
rated financial institution based in the Netherlands. The majority of the assets of the retail
finance joint ventures represent finance receivables. The majority of the liabilities represent
notes payable and accrued interest. Under the various joint venture agreements, Rabobank or its
affiliates are obligated to provide financing to the joint venture companies, primarily through
lines of credit. We do not guarantee the debt obligations of the retail finance joint ventures
other than a portion of the retail portfolio in Brazil that is held outside the joint venture by
Rabobank Brazil, which was approximately $3.9 million as of
December 31, 2008, and will gradually be eliminated over time. As of June 30, 2009, our capital
investment in the retail finance joint ventures, which is included in Investment in affiliates on
our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, was approximately $215.2 million compared to $187.8
million as of December 31, 2008. The total finance portfolio in our retail finance joint ventures
was approximately $5.3 billion and $4.8 billion as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. The total finance portfolio as of June 30, 2009 included approximately $5.0 billion
of retail receivables and $0.3 billion of wholesale receivables from AGCO dealers. The total
finance portfolio as of
December 31, 2008 included approximately $4.6 billion of retail receivables and $0.2 billion of
wholesale
31
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
receivables from AGCO dealers. The wholesale receivables were either transferred to AGCO
Finance without recourse from our operating companies or AGCO Finance provided the financing
directly to the dealers. For the first six months of 2009, our share in the earnings of the retail
finance joint ventures, included in Equity in net earnings of affiliates on our Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations, was $17.8 million compared to $15.8 million for the same
period of 2008.
The retail finance portfolio in our AGCO Finance joint venture in Brazil was $1.3 billion as
of
June 30, 2009 compared to $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2008. As a result of weak market
conditions in Brazil in 2005 and 2006, a substantial portion of this portfolio has been included in
a payment deferral program directed by the Brazilian government. The impact of the deferral
program has resulted in higher delinquencies and lower collateral coverage for the portfolio.
While the joint venture currently considers its reserves for loan losses adequate, it continually
monitors its reserves considering borrower payment history, the value of the underlying equipment
financed and further payment deferral programs implemented by the Brazilian government. To date,
our retail finance joint ventures in markets outside of Brazil have not experienced any significant
changes in the credit quality of their finance portfolios as a result of the recent global economic
challenges. However, there can be no assurance that the portfolio credit quality will not
deteriorate, and, given the size of the portfolio relative to the joint ventures levels of equity,
a significant adverse change in the joint ventures performance would have a material impact on the
joint ventures and on our operating results.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our financing requirements are subject to variations due to seasonal changes in inventory and
receivable levels. Internally generated funds are supplemented when necessary from external
sources, primarily our revolving credit facility and accounts receivable securitization facilities.
We believe that these facilities, together with available cash and internally generated funds,
will be sufficient to support our working capital, capital expenditures and debt service
requirements for the
foreseeable future:
|
|
|
Our $300 million multi-currency revolving credit facility expires in May 2013 (no
amounts were outstanding as of June 30, 2009). |
|
|
|
|
Our 200.0 million (or approximately $280.7 million) 67/8% senior subordinated notes
mature in 2014. |
|
|
|
|
Our $201.3 million 13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes may be required to be
repurchased on December 31, 2010 (see further discussion below). Our $201.3 million 11/4%
convertible senior subordinated notes may be required to be repurchased on December 15,
2013. |
|
|
|
|
Our $490.4 million securitization facilities (with aggregate outstanding funding of
$482.2 million as of June 30, 2009) expire in December 2013 (our U.S. and Canadian
securitization facilities) and in October 2011 (our European securitization facility). The
securitization facilities are also subject to annual renewal. |
In addition, although we are in complete compliance with the financial covenants contained in
these facilities and do not foresee any difficulty in continuing to meet the financial covenants,
should we ever encounter difficulties, our historical relationship with our lenders has been strong
and we anticipate their continued long-term support of our business. However, it is impossible to
predict the length or severity of the current tightened credit environment, which may impact our
ability to obtain additional financing sources or our ability to renew or extend the maturity of
our existing financing sources.
32
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
Current Facilities
Our $201.3 million of 13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes due December 31, 2033 issued
in June 2005 provide for (i) the settlement upon conversion in cash up to the principal amount of
the converted notes with any excess conversion value settled in shares of our common stock, and
(ii) the conversion rate to be increased under certain circumstances if the notes are converted in
connection with certain change of control transactions occurring prior to December 10, 2010. The
notes are unsecured obligations and are convertible into cash and shares of our common stock upon
satisfaction of certain conditions. Interest is payable on the notes at 13/4% per annum, payable
semi-annually in arrears in cash on June 30 and December 31 of each year. The notes are
convertible into shares of our common stock at an effective price of $22.36 per share, subject to
adjustment. This reflects an initial conversion rate for the notes of 44.7193 shares of common
stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes. Beginning January 1, 2011, we may redeem any of the
notes at a redemption price of 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued interest. Holders of
the notes may require us to repurchase the notes at a repurchase price of 100% of their principal
amount, plus accrued interest, on December 31, 2010, 2013, 2018, 2023 and 2028. Refer to the
Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for a full description of these notes.
Our $201.3 million of 11/4% convertible senior subordinated notes due December 15, 2036 issued
in December 2006 provide for (i) the settlement upon conversion in cash up to the principal amount
of the notes with any excess conversion value settled in shares of our common stock, and (ii) the
conversion rate
to be increased under certain circumstances if the notes are converted in connection with
certain change of control transactions occurring prior to December 15, 2013. Interest is payable
on the notes at 11/4% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on June 15 and December 15
of each year. The notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at an effective price of
$40.73 per share, subject to adjustment. This reflects an initial conversion rate for the notes of
24.5525 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes. Beginning December 15, 2013,
we may redeem any of the notes at a redemption price of 100% of their principal amount, plus
accrued interest. Holders of the notes may require us to repurchase the notes at a repurchase
price of 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued interest, on December 15, 2013, 2016, 2021,
2026 and 2031. Refer to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for a full
description of these notes.
Holders may also require us to repurchase all or a portion of our convertible senior
subordinated notes upon a fundamental change, as defined in the indentures, at a repurchase price
equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid
interest. The notes are senior subordinated obligations and are subordinated to all of our
existing and future senior indebtedness and effectively subordinated to all debt and other
liabilities of our subsidiaries. The notes are equal in right of payment with our 67/8% senior
subordinated notes due 2014.
As of June 30, 2009 the closing sales price of our common stock had exceeded 120% of the
conversion price of $22.36 per share for our 13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes for at least
20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading days ending June 30, 2009, and, therefore, we
classified the notes as a current liability. We believe it is unlikely the holders of the notes
would convert the notes under the provisions of the indenture agreement, as typically convertible
securities are not converted prior to expiration unless called for redemption, thereby requiring us
to repay the principal portion in cash. In the event the notes were converted, we believe we could
repay the notes with available cash on hand, funds from our $300.0 million multi-currency revolving
credit facility or a combination of these sources.
Future classification of the 13/4% convertible senior subordinated notes and 11/4% convertible senior
subordinated notes between current and long-term debt is dependent on the closing sales price of
our common stock during future quarters.
33
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
The 1
3/4% convertible senior subordinated notes and the 11/4% convertible senior subordinated
notes will impact the diluted weighted average shares outstanding in future periods depending on
our stock price for the excess conversion value using the treasury stock method. Refer to Notes 1,
6 and 9 of the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Our $300.0 million unsecured multi-currency revolving credit facility matures on May 16, 2013.
Interest accrues on amounts outstanding under the facility, at our option, at either (1) LIBOR
plus a margin ranging between 1.00% and 1.75% based upon our total debt ratio or (2) the higher of
the administrative agents base lending rate or one-half of one percent over the federal funds rate
plus a margin ranging between 0.0% and 0.50% based upon our total debt ratio. The facility
contains covenants restricting, among other things, the incurrence of indebtedness and the making
of certain payments, including dividends, and is subject to acceleration in the event of a default,
as defined in the facility. We also must fulfill financial covenants in respect of a total debt to
EBITDA ratio and an interest coverage ratio, as defined in the facility. As of June 30, 2009, we
had no outstanding borrowings under the facility. As of June 30, 2009, we had availability to
borrow approximately $290.6 million under the facility.
Our
200.0 million 67/8% senior subordinated notes due 2014 are unsecured obligations and are
subordinated in right of payment to any existing or future senior indebtedness. Interest is
payable on the notes semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year. Beginning April 15,
2009, we may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, initially at 103.438% of their principal
amount, plus accrued interest, declining to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued interest,
at any time on or after April 15, 2012. The notes include covenants restricting the incurrence
of indebtedness and the making of certain restricted payments, including dividends.
Under our securitization facilities, we sell accounts receivable in the United States, Canada
and Europe on a revolving basis to commercial paper conduits through a wholly-owned special purpose
U.S. subsidiary and a qualifying special purpose entity in the United Kingdom. The United States
and Canadian securitization facilities expire in December 2013 and the European facility expires in
October 2011, but each is subject to annual renewal. As of June 30, 2009, the aggregate amount of
these facilities was $490.4 million. The outstanding funded balance of $482.2 million as of June
30, 2009 has the effect of reducing accounts receivable and short-term liabilities by the same
amount. Our risk of loss under the securitization facilities is limited to a portion of the
unfunded balance of receivables sold, which is approximately 15% of the funded amount. We maintain
reserves for doubtful accounts associated with this risk. If the facilities were terminated, we
would not be required to repurchase previously sold receivables but would be prevented from selling
additional receivables to the commercial paper conduit.
The securitization facilities allow us to sell accounts receivable through financing conduits
which obtain funding from commercial paper markets. Future funding under our securitization
facilities depends upon the adequacy of receivables, a sufficient demand for the underlying
commercial paper and the maintenance of certain covenants concerning the quality of the receivables
and our financial condition. In the event commercial paper demand is not adequate, our
securitization facilities provide for liquidity backing from various financial institutions,
including Rabobank. These liquidity commitments would provide us with interim funding to allow us
to find alternative sources of working capital financing, if necessary.
We sell certain trade receivables under factoring arrangements to financial institutions
throughout the world. The Company evaluates the sale of such receivables pursuant to the
guidelines of SFAS No. 140 and has determined that these facilities should be accounted for as
off-balance sheet transactions in accordance with SFAS No. 140.
34
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
Cash Flows
Cash flows used in operating activities were $267.5 million for the first six months of 2009
compared to cash provided by operating activities of $61.3 million for the first six months of
2008. The use of cash during the first six months of 2009 was primarily due to lower net income,
seasonal increases in working capital and decreases in accounts payable driven by reduced
production levels.
Our working capital requirements are seasonal, with investments in working capital typically
building in the first half of the year and then reducing in the second half of the year. We
had $1,047.9 million in working capital at June 30, 2009, as compared with $1,026.7 million at
December 31, 2008 and $926.6 million at June 30, 2008. Accounts receivable and inventories,
combined, at June 30, 2009 were $154.2 million higher than at December 31, 2008 and relatively flat
compared to June 30, 2008. In order to reduce inventory levels from that of June 30, 2009,
production levels are expected to be lower during the second half of 2009 compared to the
comparable prior year period.
Capital expenditures for the first six months of 2009 were $101.5 million compared to $99.7
million for the first six months of 2008. We anticipate that capital expenditures for the full
year of 2009 will range from approximately $250.0 million to $275.0 million and will primarily be
used to support our manufacturing operations, systems initiatives, and to support the development
and enhancement of new and existing products.
Our debt to capitalization ratio, which is total long-term debt divided by the sum of total
long-term debt and stockholders equity, was 22.7% at June 30, 2009, compared to 24.8% at December
31, 2008.
COMMITMENTS AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Guarantees
At June 30, 2009, we were obligated under certain circumstances to purchase, through the year
2010, up to $0.9 million of equipment upon expiration of certain operating leases between AGCO
Finance LLC and AGCO Finance Canada, Ltd., our retail finance joint ventures in North America, and
end users. We also maintain a remarketing agreement with these joint ventures whereby we are
obligated to repurchase repossessed inventory at market values, limited to $6.0 million in the
aggregate per calendar year. We believe that any losses, which might be incurred on the resale of
this equipment, will not materially impact our consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
We sell certain trade receivables under factoring arrangements to financial institutions
throughout the world. We evaluate the sale of such receivables pursuant to the guidelines of SFAS
No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 125 (SFAS No. 140), and have determined that
these facilities should be accounted for as off-balance sheet transactions in accordance with SFAS
No. 140.
At June 30, 2009, we guaranteed indebtedness owed to third parties of approximately $51.1
million, primarily related to dealer and end-user financing of equipment. We believe the credit
risk associated with these guarantees is not material to our financial position.
Other
At
June 30, 2009, we had outstanding foreign exchange contracts
with a notional amount of approximately $1,044.5 million.
The outstanding contracts as
35
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
of
June 30, 2009 range in maturity through December 2009.
Gains and Losses on such contracts are historically substantially
offset by losses and gains on the exposures being hedged. See Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk Foreign Currency Risk Management for further information.
Contingencies
As a result of Brazilian tax legislation impacting value added taxes (VAT), we have recorded
a reserve of approximately $12.1 million and $13.9 million against our outstanding balance of
Brazilian VAT taxes receivable as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, due to the
uncertainty as to our ability to collect the amounts outstanding.
As disclosed in Item 3 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, in February
2006, we received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) in connection
with a non-public, fact-finding inquiry entitled In the Matter of Certain Participants in the Oil
for Food Program. Similar investigations are being conducted by others. In June 2008, the
Republic of Iraq filed a civil action against three of our foreign subsidiaries that participated
in the United Nations Oil for Food Program. In August 2008, as part of a routine audit, the
Brazilian taxing authorities disallowed deductions relating to the amortization of certain goodwill
recognized in connection with a reorganization of our Brazilian operations and the related transfer
of certain assets to our Brazilian subsidiaries. See Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings for
further discussion of these matters.
OUTLOOK
The unstable global economy has created significant uncertainty about market conditions, and
worldwide industry demand for farm equipment is expected to remain weak for the remainder of 2009.
In North America, market demand is expected to decline with the largest reduction in compact and
utility tractors. In South America, dry weather conditions and a reduction in planted acreage and
crop production are expected to produce significantly lower industry retail volumes. Lower farm
income in Europe is expected to drive reduced industry retail sales in 2009, with the weakest
markets being Central and Eastern Europe and Russia.
For the full year of 2009, we expect a decline in earnings compared to the full year of 2008
primarily due to lower sales and production volumes and increased engineering expenses for new
product development and Tier 4 emission requirements. The impacts from production cuts and working
capital reduction will decrease our earnings in the second half of 2009.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based
upon our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements
requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities.
On an ongoing basis, management evaluates estimates, including those related to reserves,
intangible assets, income taxes, pension and other postretirement benefit obligations, derivative
financial instruments, and contingencies. Management bases these estimates on historical experience
and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. A
description of critical accounting policies and related judgments and estimates that affect the
preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements is set forth
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
36
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking, including
certain statements set forth under the headings General, Statements of Operations, Retail
Finance Joint Ventures, Liquidity and Capital Resources, Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements and Outlook. Forward-looking statements reflect assumptions, expectations,
projections, intentions or beliefs about future events. These statements, which may relate to such
matters as industry demand, market and weather conditions, farm incomes, land values, general
economic outlook, commodity prices, planted acreage, crop production, availability of financing,
production levels, gross margins, engineering expenses, earnings, net sales, guarantees of
indebtedness, compliance with loan covenants, equipment resales, future capital expenditures and
indebtedness requirements and working capital needs are forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements do not relate strictly to historical or
current facts, and you can identify certain of these statements, but not necessarily all, by the
use of the words anticipate, assumed, indicate, estimate, believe, predict, forecast,
rely, expect, continue, grow and other words of similar meaning. Although we believe that
the expectations and assumptions reflected in these statements are reasonable in view of the
information currently available to us, there can be no assurance that these expectations will prove
to be correct.
These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, and actual
results may differ materially from the results discussed in or implied by the forward-looking
statements. Adverse changes in any of the following factors could cause actual results to differ
materially from the forward-looking statements:
|
|
general economic and capital market conditions; |
|
|
|
availability of credit to our customers; |
|
|
|
the worldwide demand for agricultural products; |
|
|
|
grain stock levels and the levels of new and used field inventories; |
|
|
|
cost of steel and other raw materials; |
|
|
|
performance of the accounts receivable originated or owned by AGCO or AGCO Finance; |
|
|
|
government policies and subsidies; |
|
|
|
weather conditions; |
|
|
|
interest and foreign currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
pricing and product actions taken by competitors; |
|
|
|
commodity prices, acreage planted and crop yields; |
|
|
|
farm income, land values, debt levels and access to credit; |
|
|
|
pervasive livestock diseases; |
|
|
|
production disruptions; |
|
|
|
supply and capacity constraints; |
|
|
|
our cost reduction and control initiatives; |
|
|
|
our research and development efforts; |
|
|
|
dealer and distributor actions; |
37
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)
|
|
technological difficulties; and |
|
|
|
political and economic uncertainty in various areas of the world. |
Any forward-looking statement should be considered in light of such important factors. For
additional factors and additional information regarding these factors, please see Risk Factors in
our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
New factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described above
emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of such factors or the
extent to which any such factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ from
those contained in any forward-looking statement. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of
the date on which such statement is made, and we disclaim any obligation to update the information
contained in such statement to reflect subsequent developments or information except as required by
law.
38
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK MANAGEMENT
We have significant manufacturing operations in the United States, France, Germany, Finland
and Brazil, and we purchase a portion of our tractors, combines and components from third-party
foreign suppliers, primarily in various European countries and in Japan. We also sell products in
over 140 countries throughout the world. The majority of our net sales outside the United States
are denominated in the currency of the customer location with the exception of sales in the Middle
East, Africa and Asia, where net sales are primarily denominated in Euros or United States dollars
(See Segment Reporting in Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year
ended December 31, 2008 for sales by customer location). Our most significant transactional
foreign currency exposures are the Euro, the Brazilian real, and the Canadian dollar in relation to
the United States dollar and the Euro in relation to the British pound. Fluctuations in the value
of foreign currencies create exposures, which can adversely affect our results of operations.
We attempt to manage our transactional foreign exchange exposure by hedging foreign currency
cash flow forecasts and commitments arising from the anticipated settlement of receivables and
payables and from future purchases and sales. Where naturally offsetting currency positions do not
occur, we hedge certain, but not all, of our exposures through the use of foreign currency option
and forward contracts. Our translation exposure resulting from translating the financial
statements of foreign subsidiaries into United States dollars is not hedged. Our most significant
translation exposures are the Euro, the British pound and the Brazilian real in relation to the
United States dollar. When practical, this translation impact is reduced by financing local
operations with local borrowings. Our hedging policy prohibits use of foreign currency option or
forward contracts for speculative trading purposes.
All derivatives are recognized on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. On
the date a derivative contract is entered into, we designate the derivative as either (1) a fair
value hedge of a recognized liability, (2) a cash flow hedge of a forecasted transaction, (3) a
hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, or (4) a non-designated derivative instrument.
We currently engage in derivatives that are cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions as well as
non-designated derivative instruments. Changes in the fair value of non-designated derivative
contracts are reported in current earnings. During 2009 and 2008, we designated certain foreign
currency option and forward contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted sales. The
effective portion of the fair value gains or losses on these cash flow hedges are recorded in other
comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into cost of goods sold during the period the
sales are recognized. These amounts offset the effect of the changes in foreign exchange rates on
the related sale transactions. The amount of the (loss) gain recorded in other
comprehensive income (loss) that was reclassified to cost of goods sold during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $(13.5) million and $11.1 million, respectively, on an
after-tax basis. The outstanding contracts as of June 30, 2009 range in maturity through December
2009.
Generally, we have not required collateral from counterparties, nor have we historically been
asked to post collateral with respect to hedging transactions, with the following exception.
During 2009 and 2008, we deposited cash with a financial institution as security against
outstanding foreign exchange contracts that mature throughout 2009. As of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the amount deposited was approximately $7.3 million and $33.8 million,
respectively, and was classified as Restricted cash in the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The amount posted as security will either increase or decrease in the future
depending on the value of the outstanding amount of contracts secured under the arrangement and the
relative impact on gains (losses) on the outstanding contracts.
39
In previous years, we provided a table that summarized all of our foreign currency derivative
contracts used to hedge foreign currency exposures, which included disclosure of notional amounts
as well as fair value gains and losses on such hedges denoted by foreign currency. Effective first
quarter of 2009 and prospectively, we are disclosing market risk, as it relates to our foreign
currency exchange rate risk, using a sensitivity model, where we analyze the impact on all
outstanding foreign currency derivative contracts of a 10% weakening of the applicable functional
currency relative to other foreign currencies. We believe this provides better clarity of risk
related to our foreign currency derivative instruments.
Assuming a 10% weakening of the functional currency relative to other foreign currencies, the
fair value loss on the foreign currency derivative instruments would have increased by
approximately $68.7 million as of June 30, 2009. Using the same sensitivity analysis as of June
30, 2008, the fair value loss on such instruments would have increased by approximately $2.8
million. Due to the fact that these instruments are primarily entered into for hedging purposes,
the gains or losses on the derivative contracts would be largely offset by losses and gains on the
underlying firm commitment or forecasted transaction.
Interest Rates
We manage interest rate risk through the use of fixed rate debt and may in the future utilize
interest rate swap contracts. We have fixed rate debt from our senior subordinated notes and our
convertible senior subordinated notes. Our floating rate exposure is related to our credit
facility and our securitization facilities, which are tied to changes in United States and European
LIBOR rates. Assuming a 10% increase in interest rates, interest expense, net and the cost of our
securitization facilities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 would have increased by
approximately $1.2 million.
We had no interest rate swap contracts outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
40
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended) as of June 30, 2009, have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange
Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuers management, including its principal executive
and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer, does not expect that the Companys disclosure controls or the Companys internal controls
will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control
system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are
resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.
Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.
Because of the inherent limitations in a cost effective control system, misstatements due to error
or fraud may occur and not be detected. We will conduct periodic evaluations of our internal
controls to enhance, where necessary, our procedures and controls.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation described above that occurred during the six months ended June 30,
2009 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal
control over financial reporting.
41
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are a party to various other legal claims and actions incidental to our business. These
items are more fully discussed in Note 16 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The Companys annual meeting of stockholders was held on April 23, 2009. The following
matters were voted upon and the results of the voting were as follows:
|
(1) |
|
To elect three directors to serve as Class II directors until the annual meeting in
2012 or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. The nominees, Messrs.
Benson, Shaheen and Visser, were elected to the Companys board of directors. The results
follow: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee |
|
Affirmative Votes |
|
Withheld Votes |
|
P. George Benson |
|
|
73,613,231 |
|
|
|
6,704,893 |
|
Gerald L. Shaheen |
|
|
52,091,230 |
|
|
|
28,226,894 |
|
Hendrikus Visser |
|
|
73,469,824 |
|
|
|
6,848,300 |
|
|
(2) |
|
To ratify the appointment of the Companys independent registered public accounting
firm for 2009. The results follow: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
79,784,514
|
|
|
513,542 |
|
|
|
20,068 |
|
42
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The filings referenced for |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
incorporation by reference are |
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
AGCO Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Martin Richenhagen
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Andrew H. Beck
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
Certification of Martin Richenhagen and Andrew H. Beck
|
|
Furnished herewith |
43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGCO CORPORATION
Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 7, 2009
|
|
/s/ Andrew H. Beck
Andrew H. Beck
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
44