Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20429
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number 0-29709
HARLEYSVILLE SAVINGS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Pennsylvania   23-3028464
     
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)   Identification No.)
271 Main Street, Harleysville, Pennsylvania 19438
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(215) 256-8828
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value, 3,731,991 shares outstanding as of May 13, 2011.
 
 

 

 


 

HARLEYSVILLE SAVINGS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Index
         
    PAGE(S)  
 
       
       
 
       
       
 
       
    1  
 
       
    2  
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6 - 26  
 
       
    26 - 30  
 
       
    30 - 31  
 
       
    32  
 
       
       
 
       
    33  
 
       
    33  
 
       
    33  
 
       
    33  
 
       
    33  
 
       
    33  
 
       
    33  
 
       
    34  
 
       
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32.0

 

 


Table of Contents

Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
                 
    March 31,     September 30,  
(In thousands, except share data)   2011     2010  
 
               
Assets
               
Cash and amounts due from depository institutions
  $ 4,476     $ 4,052  
Interest bearing deposits
    19,484       16,138  
 
           
Total cash and cash equivalents
    23,960       20,190  
 
               
Investments and mortgage-backed securities:
               
Available for sale (amortized cost — March 31, $10,774; September 30, $21,401)
    10,860       21,413  
Held to maturity (fair value — March 31, $275,116; September 30, $264,448)
    271,744       256,088  
Loans receivable (net of allowance for loan losses —
               
March 31, $2,795; September 30, $2,504)
    501,180       510,093  
Accrued interest receivable
    3,167       3,210  
Federal Home Loan Bank stock — at cost
    14,526       16,096  
Foreclosed real estate
    372       186  
Office properties and equipment, net
    12,070       12,158  
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    18,599       17,706  
 
           
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 856,478     $ 857,140  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
               
Liabilities:
               
Deposits
  $ 531,272     $ 528,100  
Long-term debt
    263,632       272,047  
Accrued interest payable
    1,333       1,407  
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance
    4,450       1,247  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    782       988  
 
           
Total liabilities
    801,469       803,789  
 
           
 
               
Commitments and contingencies
               
 
               
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Preferred Stock: $.01 par value;
7,500,000 shares authorized; none issued
           
Common stock: $.01 par value; 15,000,000 shares authorized;
3,921,177 shares issued; outstanding March 31, 2011 3,731,574 shares
September 30, 2010 3,687,409 shares
    39       39  
Additional paid-in capital
    8,224       8,126  
Treasury stock, at cost (March 31, 2011, 189,603 shares; September 30, 2010, 233,768 shares)
    (2,777 )     (3,383 )
Retained earnings — partially restricted
    49,466       48,562  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    57       7  
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    55,009       53,351  
 
           
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 856,478     $ 857,140  
 
           
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

page -1-


Table of Contents

Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    March 31,     March 31,  
(In thousands, except per share data)   2011     2010     2011     2010  
Interest Income:
                               
Interest on mortgage loans
  $ 4,688     $ 4,992     $ 9,491     $ 10,076  
Interest on commercial loans
    1,246       976       2,482       1,915  
Interest on mortgage-backed securities
    1,329       1,772       2,734       3,677  
Interest on consumer and other loans
    1,008       1,090       2,060       2,227  
Interest on other taxable investments
    803       851       1,534       1,760  
Interest on tax-exempt investments
    216       262       419       543  
Dividends on investment securities
    1       1       2       2  
 
                       
Total interest income
    9,291       9,944       18,722       20,200  
 
                       
 
                               
Interest Expense:
                               
Interest on deposits
    1,895       2,273       3,912       4,808  
Interest on borrowings
    2,869       3,152       5,827       6,486  
 
                       
Total interest expense
    4,764       5,425       9,739       11,294  
 
                       
 
                               
Net Interest Income
    4,527       4,519       8,983       8,906  
Provision for loan losses
    175       150       325       300  
 
                       
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses
    4,352       4,369       8,658       8,606  
 
                       
 
                               
Other Income:
                               
Customer service fees
    127       152       264       313  
Income on bank-owned life insurance
    121       121       244       243  
Other income
    184       185       425       404  
 
                       
Total other income
    432       458       933       960  
 
                       
 
                               
Other Expenses:
                               
Salaries and employee benefits
    1,895       1,762       3,624       3,431  
Occupancy and equipment
    368       336       714       629  
Deposit insurance premiums
    263       226       489       453  
Data processing
    163       169       330       322  
Other
    651       737       1,345       1,465  
 
                       
Total other expenses
    3,340       3,230       6,502       6,300  
 
                       
 
                               
Income before Income Taxes
    1,444       1,597       3,089       3,266  
 
                               
Income tax expense
    350       437       779       892  
 
                       
 
                               
Net Income
  $ 1,094     $ 1,160     $ 2,310     $ 2,374  
 
                       
 
                               
Basic Earnings Per Share
  $ 0.29     $ 0.32     $ 0.62     $ 0.65  
 
                       
Diluted Earnings Per Share
  $ 0.29     $ 0.32     $ 0.62     $ 0.65  
 
                       
 
                               
Dividends Per Share
  $ 0.19     $ 0.19     $ 0.38     $ 0.38  
 
                       
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

page -2-


Table of Contents

Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
(In thousands)   2011     2010  
Net Income
  $ 1,094     $ 1,160  
 
               
Other Comprehensive Income
               
 
               
Unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale, net of tax (benefit) expense 2011, ($10); 2010, $28 and reclassifications
    (20 )(1)     56 (1)
 
           
 
               
Total Comprehensive Income
  $ 1,074     $ 1,216  
 
           
                 
    2011     2010  
(1) Disclosure of reclassification amount, net of tax for the three months ended:
               
Net unrealized (loss) gain arising during the three months ended
  $ (30 )   $ 84  
Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income
           
 
           
 
               
 
    (30 )     84  
Tax benefit (expense)
    10       (28 )
 
           
Net unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale
  $ (20 )   $ 56  
 
           
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    March 31,  
(In thousands)   2011     2010  
 
               
Net Income
  $ 2,310     $ 2,374  
 
               
Other Comprehensive Income
               
 
               
Unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for sale, net of tax (benefit) expense 2011, $25; 2010, $29 and reclassifications
    (50 )(1)     57 (1)
 
           
 
               
Total Comprehensive Income
  $ 2,260     $ 2,431  
 
           
                 
    2011     2010  
(1) Disclosure of reclassification amount, net of tax for the three months ended:
               
Net unrealized gain arising during the three months ended
  $ 75     $ 86  
Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income
           
 
           
 
               
 
    75       86  
Tax expense
    (25 )     (29 )
 
           
Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale
  $ 50     $ 57  
 
           
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

page -3-


Table of Contents

Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
                                                         
    Common                     Retained     Accumulated                
    Stock             Additional     Earnings-     Other             Total  
    Shares     Common     Paid-in     Partially     Comprehensive     Treasury     Stockholders’  
(In thousands, except share and per share data)   Outstanding     Stock     Capital     Restricted     (Loss) / Income     Stock     Equity  
 
                                                       
Balance at October 1, 2010
    3,687,409     $ 39     $ 8,126     $ 48,562     $ 7     $ (3,383 )   $ 53,351  
 
                                                       
Net income
                            2,310                       2,310  
Dividends — $.38 per share
                            (1,406 )                     (1,406 )
Stock option compensation
                    103                               103  
Treasury stock delivered under ESOP
    10,000               10                       137       147  
Treasury stock delivered under reinvestment plan
    20,380               26                       280       306  
Employee options exercised
    13,785               (41 )                     189       148  
Change in unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification and tax
                                    50               50  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Balance at March 31, 2011
    3,731,574     $ 39     $ 8,224     $ 49,466     $ 57     $ (2,777 )   $ 55,009  
 
                                         
                                                         
    Common                     Retained     Accumulated                
    Stock             Additional     Earnings-     Other             Total  
    Shares     Common     Paid-in     Partially     Comprehensive     Treasury     Stockholders’  
(In thousands, except share and per share data)   Outstanding     Stock     Capital     Restricted     (Loss) / Income     Stock     Equity  
 
                                                       
Balance at October 1, 2009
    3,627,696     $ 39     $ 8,002     $ 46,329     $ (29 )   $ (4,202 )   $ 50,139  
 
                                                       
Net income
                            2,374                       2,374  
Dividends — $.38 per share
                            (1,382 )                     (1,382 )
Stock option compensation
                    81                               81  
Treasury stock purchase
    (5,659 )                                     (77 )     (77 )
Treasury stock delivered under ESOP
    10,000                                       137       137  
Treasury stock delivered under reinvestment plan
    20,939               (6 )                     286       280  
Employee options exercised
    7,916               (38 )                     109       71  
Change in unrealized holding loss on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification and tax
                                    57               57  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Balance at March 31, 2010
    3,660,892     $ 39     $ 8,039     $ 47,321     $ 28     $ (3,747 )   $ 51,680  
 
                                         
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

page -4-


Table of Contents

Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
                 
    Six Months Ended March 31,  
(In thousands)   2011     2010  
Operating Activities:
               
Net Income
  $ 2,310     $ 2,374  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation
    309       259  
Provision for loan losses
    325       300  
Loss on sale of foreclosed real estate
          159  
Amortization of deferred loan fees
    126       58  
Net (accretion) amortization of premiums and discounts
    (86 )     65  
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance
    (244 )     (243 )
Compensation charge on stock options
    103       81  
Changes in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash:
               
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses
    (206 )     (489 )
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets
    (649 )     (3,277 )
Decrease in accrued interest receivable
    43       108  
Decrease in accrued interest payable
    (74 )     (149 )
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    1,957       (754 )
 
               
Investing Activities:
               
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities held to maturity
    (36,930 )     (1,571 )
Purchase of investment securities held to maturity
    (39,228 )     (50,953 )
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale
    (33,114 )     (30,900 )
Net redemption FHLB stock
    1,570        
Proceeds from the redemption of investment securities available-for-sale
    43,717       33,780  
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities held to maturity
    36,665       40,429  
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate
          588  
Principal collected on mortgage-backed securities held to maturity
    23,923       22,125  
Principal collected on long term loans
    60,948       55,161  
Long term loans originated or acquired
    (52,672 )     (68,623 )
Purchases of premises and equipment
    (221 )     (1,894 )
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    4,658       (1,858 )
 
               
Financing Activities:
               
Net increase in demand deposits, NOW accounts and savings accounts
    9,196       44,219  
Net decrease in certificates of deposit
    (6,024 )     (19,246 )
Cash dividends
    (1,090 )     (1,102 )
Repayment of long-term debt
    (8,415 )     (18,648 )
Acquisition of treasury stock
          (77 )
Treasury stock delivered under employee stock plans
    285       208  
Net increase in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance
    3,203       3,039  
 
           
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (2,845 )     8,393  
 
           
 
               
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    3,770       5,781  
 
               
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
    20,190       9,442  
 
           
 
               
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR
  $ 23,960     $ 15,223  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
               
Cash paid during the period for:
               
Interest (credited and paid)
  $ 9,813     $ 11,444  
Income taxes
    1,020       925  
Foreclosed real estate acquired in settlement of loans
    186        
 
               
Securities purchased and not settled
  $     $ 2,800  
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

page -5-


Table of Contents

Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation -The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Harleysville Savings Financial Corporation (the “Company”) and its subsidiary. Harleysville Savings Bank (the “Bank”) is the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Bank, and the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, HSB Inc, a Delaware corporation which was formed in order to hold certain assets, Freedom Financial LLC that allows the Company to offer non deposit products and HARL LLC that allows the Bank to invest in equity investments. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and therefore do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. However, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for the entire fiscal year ending September 30, 2011 or any other period. The financial information should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2010.
Use of Estimates in Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant of these estimates is the allowance for loan losses, the determination of other-than-temporary impairment on securities and the valuation of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior period’s financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s classifications. The reclassifications had no effect on net income.
Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date of March 31, 2011 for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these financial statements. The evaluation was conducted through the date these financial statements were issued.

 

page -6-


Table of Contents

Recent Accounting Pronouncements — In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) — Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. This Update amends the Accounting Standards (Codification) for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. The amendments in this Update improve financial reporting by eliminating the exceptions for qualifying special-purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale accounting for certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the transferred financial assets. In addition, the amendments require enhanced disclosures about the risks that a transferor continues to be exposed to because of its continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. Comparability and consistency in accounting for transferred financial assets will also be improved through clarifications of the requirements for isolation and limitations on portions of financial assets that are eligible for sale accounting. This Update is effective at the start of a reporting entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this new guidance did not have an impact on our financial position or result of operations.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17, Consolidations (Topic 810) — Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. This Update amends the Codification for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). The amendments in this Update replace the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which reporting entity, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which reporting entity has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. An approach that is expected to be primarily qualitative will be more effective for identifying which reporting entity has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The amendments in this Update also require additional disclosures about a reporting entity’s involvement in variable interest entities, which will enhance the information provided to users of financial statements. This Update is effective at the start of a reporting entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this new guidance did not have an impact on our financial position or result of operations.
The FASB has issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This ASU requires some new disclosures and clarifies some existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement as set forth in Codification Subtopic 820-10. The FASB’s objective is to improve these disclosures and, thus, increase the transparency in financial reporting. Specifically, ASU 2010-06 amends Codification Subtopic 820-10 to now require:
   
A reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers; and
   
In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements.
In addition, ASU 2010-06 clarifies the requirements of the following existing disclosures:
   
For purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities; and
   
A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements.

 

page -7-


Table of Contents

ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.
ASU 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, will help investors assess the credit risk of a company’s receivables portfolio and the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses held against the portfolios by expanding credit risk disclosures.
This ASU requires more information about the credit quality of financing receivables in the disclosures to financial statements, such as aging information and credit quality indicators. Both new and existing disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment or class. The disaggregation of information is based on how a company develops its allowance for credit losses and how it manages its credit exposure.
The amendments in this update apply to all public and nonpublic entities with financing receivables. Financing receivables include loans and trade accounts receivable. However, short-term trade accounts receivable, receivables measured at fair value or lower of cost or fair value, and debt securities are exempt from these disclosure amendments.
The effective date of ASU 2010-20 differs for public and nonpublic companies. For public companies, the amendments that require disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The amendments that require disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. For nonpublic companies, the amendments are effective for annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2011. The Company has provided the required credit quality disclosures as of the end of the reporting periods December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2011 and disclosures about the activity for the three months ended March 31, 2011.
ASU 2011 — 01 Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20. The amendments in this Update temporarily delay the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings in Update 2010-20 for public entities. Under the existing effective date in Update 2010-20, public-entity creditors would have provided disclosures about troubled debt restructurings for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The delay was intended to allow FASB time to complete its deliberations on what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. FASB issued this new standard as discussed in the following paragraph. The effective date of the new disclosures about troubled debt restructurings for public entities is coordinated with the adoption of this new standard.
In April 2011 the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2011-02, Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring, to clarify the accounting principles applied to loan modifications. ASU No. 2011-02 was issued to address the recording of an impairment loss in FASB ASC 310, Receivables. ASU No. 2011-02 adds text to the scope guidance Section 310-40-15 that is meant to help determine when a lender has granted a concession on their terms of a loan. The added material also provides criteria that should be used to help determine when the loan restructuring delays a payment by a length of time that is considered insignificant and when the borrower is having financial problems. For public companies the effective date is for fiscal quarters and years that start June 15, 2011, or later with the retrospective application to the beginning of the fiscal year for loans that are restructured during the year in which the changes are adopted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the adoption of this update will have on their financial condition or statement of operations.

 

page -8-


Table of Contents

2. INVESTMENT AND MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of the Company’s securities gross unrealized gains and losses, as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 are as follows:
Available for sale securities:
                                 
    March 31, 2011  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
(In Thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
Equity securities
  $ 355     $ 72     $ (31 )   $ 396  
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    785       45             830  
U.S. Government money market funds
    9,634                   9,634  
 
                       
Total Available for Sale Securities
  $ 10,774     $ 117     $ (31 )   $ 10,860  
 
                       
                                 
    September 30, 2010  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
(In Thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
Equity securities
  $ 355     $ 42     $ (54 )   $ 343  
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    785       24             809  
U.S. Government money market funds
    20,261                   20,261  
 
                       
Total Available for Sale Securities
  $ 21,401     $ 66     $ (54 )   $ 21,413  
 
                       
Held to maturity securities:
                                 
    March 31, 2011  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
(In Thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
 
Mortgage-backed securities- U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE’s)
  $ 118,632     $ 5,559     $ (48 )   $ 124,143  
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    25,224       199       (4 )     25,419  
Municipal bonds
    20,067       487       (110 )     20,444  
 
U.S. Government Agencies
    107,821       198       (2,909 )     105,110  
 
                       
Total Held to Maturity Securities
  $ 271,744     $ 6,443     $ (3,071 )   $ 275,116  
 
                       
                                 
    September 30, 2010  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
(In Thousands)   Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
Mortgage-backed securities- U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE’s)
  $ 110,732     $ 6,755     $     $ 117,487  
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    20,087       193       (37 )     20,243  
Municipal bonds
    16,462       773       (47 )     17,188  
U.S. Government Agencies
    108,807       768       (45 )     109,530  
 
                       
Total Held to Maturity Securities
  $ 256,088     $ 8,489     $ (129 )   $ 264,448  
 
                       

 

page -9-


Table of Contents

A summary of securities with unrealized losses, aggregated by category, at March 31, 2011 is as follows:
                                                 
                                    Total  
    Less than 12 Months     12 Months or Longer             Total  
            Unrealized             Unrealized     Total     Unrealized  
(In Thousands)   Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses  
Collateralized mortgage obligations
  $ 7,571     $ (4 )   $     $     $ 7,571     $ (4 )
Municipal bonds
    2,944       (23 )     1,451       (87 )     4,395       (110 )
U.S. Government Agencies and GSE’s
    102,496       (2,957 )                 102,496       (2,957 )
 
                                   
Subtotal debt securities
    113,011       (2,984 )     1,451       (87 )     114,462       (3,071 )
Equity securities
    24             181       (31 )     205       (31 )
 
                                   
Total temporarily impaired securities
  $ 113,035     $ (2,984 )   $ 1,632     $ (118 )   $ 114,667     $ (3,102 )
 
                                   
At March 31, 2011, debt securities in a gross unrealized loss position consisted of 45 securities that at such date had an aggregate depreciation of 2.61% from the Company’s amortized cost basis. Management believes that the estimated fair value of the securities disclosed above is primarily dependent upon the movement in market interest rates. Management evaluated the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost; the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer. The Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities until maturity and the Company does not believe it will be required to sell such securities prior to the recovery of the amortized cost basis. Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss as of March 31, 2011 represents an other-than-temporary impairment.
As of March 31, 2011, there were three equity securities in an unrealized loss position. Management evaluated the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been less than cost; the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer such as changes in technology that may impair the earnings potential of the investment or the discontinuance of a segment of the business that may effect the future earnings potential. The Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities until the anticipated recovery of fair value occurs. Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss of March 31, 2011 represents an other-than-temporary impairment.
A summary of securities with unrealized losses, aggregated by category, at September 30, 2010 is as follows:
                                                 
                                    Total  
    Less than 12 Months     12 Months or Longer             Total  
            Unrealized             Unrealized     Total     Unrealized  
(In Thousands)   Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses  
Collateralized mortgage obligations
  $ 8,262     $ (4 )   $ 1,530     $ (33 )   $ 9,792     $ (37 )
Municipal bonds
    378             1,494       (47 )     1,872       (47 )
U.S. Government Agencies and GSE’s
    6,955       (45 )                 6,955       (45 )
 
                                   
Subtotal debt securities
    15,595       (49 )     3,024       (80 )     18,619       (129 )
Equity Securities
    55       (3 )     160       (51 )     215       (54 )
 
                                   
Total temporarily impaired securities
  $ 15,650     $ (52 )   $ 3,184     $ (131 )   $ 18,834     $ (183 )
 
                                   

 

page -10-


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the stated maturities of the investment and mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 2011. Money market funds and equity securities are not included in the table based on lack of maturity.
                 
    March 31, 2011  
    Amortized        
(In Thousands)   Cost     Fair Value  
 
Available for sale:
               
Due in one year or less
  $ 785     $ 830  
Due after one year through five years
           
Due after five years through ten years
           
Due after ten years
           
 
           
Total
  $ 785     $ 830  
 
           
 
               
Held to maturity:
               
Due in one year or less
  $ 138,568     $ 136,400  
Due after one year through five years
    117,678       123,117  
Due after five years through ten years
    14,672       14,658  
Due after ten years
    826       941  
 
           
Total
  $ 271,744     $ 275,116  
 
           
Certain of the Company’s investment securities, totaling $9.3 million and $10.3 at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively, were pledged as collateral to secure deposit sweep accounts and public deposits as required or permitted by law.
3. LOANS RECEIVABLE
Loans receivable consists of the following:
                 
(In Thousands)   March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
Residential Mortgages
  $ 332,219     $ 339,874  
Construction
    6,129       4,752  
Home Equity
    85,958       90,511  
Commercial Mortgages
    79,203       75,450  
Commercial Business Loans
    6,442       4,327  
Consumer Non-Real Estate
    1,125       1,980  
 
           
 
               
Total
    511,076       516,894  
Undisbursed portion of loans in process
    (6,129 )     (3,426 )
Deferred loan fees
    (972 )     (871 )
Allowance for loan losses
    (2,795 )     (2,504 )
 
           
 
               
Loans Receivable — net
  $ 501,180     $ 510,093  
 
           
The total amount of loans being serviced for the benefit of others was approximately $1.74 million and $1.76 million at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively.

 

page -11-


Table of Contents

The loans receivable portfolio is segmented into consumer and commercial loans. Consumer loans consist of the following classes: residential mortgage loans, construction loans, home equity loans and other consumer loans. Commercial loans consist of the following classes: commercial mortgages and commercial business loans. For all classes of loans receivable, the accrual of interest is discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past due or management has serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest, even though the loan is currently performing. A loan may remain on accrual status if it is in the process of collection and is either guaranteed or well secured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest credited to income in the current year is reversed and unpaid interest accrued in prior years is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Interest received on nonaccrual loans including impaired loans generally is either applied against principal or reported as interest income, according to management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time (generally six months) and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt. The past due status of all classes of loans receivable is determined based on contractual due dates for loan payments.
The allowance for credit losses consists of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments. The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and is recorded as a reduction to loans. The reserve for unfunded lending commitments represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in its unfunded loan commitments and is recorded in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The allowance for credit losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. All, or part, of the principal balance of loans receivable are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely. Because all identified losses are immediately charged off, no portion of the allowance for loan losses is restricted to any individual loan or groups of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.
The allowance for credit losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is based on the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers pools of loans by loan class. These pools of loans are evaluated for loss exposure based upon historical loss rates for each of these categories of loans, adjusted for qualitative factors. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary lending areas, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are reevaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current economic environment.
Residential mortgage lending generally entails a lower risk of default than other types of lending. Other consumer loans and commercial real estate loans generally involve more risk of collectability because of the type and nature of the collateral and, in certain cases, the absence of collateral. It is the Company’s policy to establish specific reserves for losses on delinquent consumer loans and commercial loans when it determines that losses are probable.

 

page -12-


Table of Contents

An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent
An allowance for loan losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Company’s impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the loan’s collateral.
For residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and commercial loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily through third-party appraisals. When a real estate secured loan becomes impaired, a decision is made regarding whether an updated certified appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This decision is based on various considerations, including the age of the most recent appraisal, the loan-to-value ratio based on the original appraisal and the condition of the property. Appraised values are discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include estimated costs to sell the property.
For commercial business loans secured by non-real estate collateral, such as accounts receivable, inventory and equipment, estimated fair values are determined based on the borrower’s financial statements, inventory reports, accounts receivable aging or equipment appraisals or invoices. Indications of value from these sources are generally discounted based on the age of the financial information or the quality of the assets.
The allowance calculation methodology includes further segregation of loan classes into risk rating categories. The borrower’s overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated annually for commercial loans or when credit deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments, for commercial and consumer loans. Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Loans criticized special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Loan not classified are rated pass.
In addition, Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to management. Based on management’s comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, management believes the current level of the allowance for loan losses is adequate.

 

page -13-


Table of Contents

The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aggregate pass rating and the classified ratings of special mention, substandard and doubtful within the Company’s internal risk rating system as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
March 31, 2011
                                         
            Special                    
(In Thousands)   Pass     Mention     Substandard     Doubtful     Total  
 
                                       
Residential Mortgages
  $ 329,425     $     $ 2,428     $ 366     $ 332,219  
Construction
    6,129                         6,129  
Home Equity
    85,746             147       65       85,958  
Commercial Mortgages
    76,760       2,211             232       79,203  
Commercial Business Loans
    6,342       100                   6,442  
Consumer Non-Real Estate
    1,120                   5       1,125  
 
                             
Total
  $ 505,522     $ 2,311     $ 2,575     $ 668     $ 511,076  
 
                             
December 31, 2010
                                         
            Special                    
(In Thousands)   Pass     Mention     Substandard     Doubtful     Total  
 
Residential Mortgages
  $ 330,283     $     $ 1,974     $ 641     $ 332,898  
Construction
    5,420                         5,420  
Home Equity
    88,759             103       65       88,927  
Commercial Mortgages
    76,096       2,214             312       78,622  
Commercial Business Loans
    6,498       100                   6,598  
Consumer Non-Real Estate
    1,194                   6       1,200  
 
                             
Total
  $ 508,250     $ 2,314     $ 2,077     $ 1,024     $ 513,665  
 
                             

 

page -14-


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes information in regards to impaired loans by loan portfolio class as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and for the three months then ended:
March 31, 2011
                                         
            Unpaid             Average     Interest  
    Recorded     Principal     Related     Recorded     Income  
(In Thousands)   Investment     Balance     Allowance     Investment     Recognized  
With no related allowance recorded:
                                       
Residential Mortgages
  $ 1,130     $ 1,130     $     $ 846     $ 9  
Construction
                             
Home Equity
    65       65             65        
Commercial Mortgages
                             
Commercial Business Loans
                             
Consumer Non—Real Estate
                             
 
                                       
With an allowance recorded:
                                       
Residential Mortgages
  $ 1,664     $ 1,664     $ (317 )   $ 1,653     $ 2  
Construction
                             
Home Equity
    147       147       (147 )     118        
Commercial Mortgages
    232       232       (105 )     259        
Commercial Business Loans
                             
Consumer Non—Real Estate
    5       5       (5 )     5        
 
                                       
Total:
                                       
Residential Mortgages
  $ 2,794     $ 2,794     $ (317 )   $ 2,499     $ 11  
Construction
                             
Home Equity
    212       212       (147 )     183        
Commercial Mortgages
    232       232       (105 )     259        
Commercial Business Loans
                             
Consumer Non—Real Estate
    5       5       (5 )     5        

 

page -15-


Table of Contents

December 31, 2010
                                         
            Unpaid             Average     Interest  
    Recorded     Principal     Related     Recorded     Income  
(In Thousands)   Investment     Balance     Allowance     Investment     Recognized  
With no related allowance recorded:
                                       
Residential Mortgages
  $ 1,047     $ 1,047     $     $ 1,050     $ 10  
Construction
                             
Home Equity
    65       65             65        
Commercial Mortgages
                             
Commercial Business Loans
                             
Consumer Non-Real Estate
                             
 
                                       
With an allowance recorded:
                                       
Residential Mortgages
  $ 1,568     $ 1,568     $ (269 )   $ 1,568     $ 2  
Construction
                             
Home Equity
    103       103       (103 )     104        
Commercial Mortgages
    312       312       (127 )     312        
Commercial Business Loans
                             
Consumer Non-Real Estate
    6       6       (6 )     6        
 
                                       
Total:
                                       
Residential Mortgages
  $ 2,615     $ 2,615     $ (269 )   $ 2,618     $ 12  
Construction
                             
Home Equity
    168       168       (103 )     169        
Commercial Mortgages
    312       312       (127 )     312        
Commercial Business Loans
                             
Consumer Non-Real Estate
    6       6       (6 )     6        

 

page -16-


Table of Contents

The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by the analyzing the age of the loans receivable as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
March 31, 2011
                                                 
                                            Loans  
                                            Receivable  
            Greater                             > 90 Days  
    30-89 Days Past     than 90     Total             Total Loans     and  
(In Thousands)   Due     Days     Past Due     Current     Receivables     Accruing  
 
                                               
Residential Mortgages
  $ 4,448     $ 2,962     $ 7,410     $ 324,809     $ 332,219     $ 380  
Construction
                      6,129       6,129        
Home Equity
    10       44       54       85,904       85,958       44  
Commercial Mortgages
    2,009       232       2,241       76,962       79,203        
Commercial Business Loans
                      6,442       6,442        
Consumer Non—Real Estate
    64       5       69       1,056       1,125        
 
                                   
 
                                               
Total
  $ 6,531     $ 3,243     $ 9,774     $ 501,302     $ 511,076     $ 424  
 
                                   
December 31, 2010
                                                 
                                            Loans  
                                            Receivable  
            Greater                             > 90 Days  
    30-89 Days Past     than 90     Total             Total Loans     and  
(In Thousands)   Due     Days     Past Due     Current     Receivables     Accruing  
 
Residential Mortgages
  $ 2,691     $ 2,447     $ 5,138     $ 327,760     $ 332,898     $ 380  
Construction
                      5,420       5,420        
Home Equity
    57       12       69       88,858       88,927       12  
Commercial Mortgages
          312       312       78,310       78,622        
Commercial Business Loans
                      6,598       6,598        
Consumer Non-Real Estate
    31       6       37       1,163       1,200        
 
                                   
 
                                               
Total
  $ 2,779     $ 2,777     $ 5,556     $ 508,109     $ 513,665     $ 392  
 
                                   

 

page -17-


Table of Contents

The following table provides the activity in the allowance for loan losses by loan class for the three-months ended March 31, 2011 and the balance in the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2011 disaggregated on the basis of the Company’s impairment method by loan class along with the balance of loans receivable by class disaggregated on the basis of the Company’s impairment methodology.
                                                                 
    At and for the Three-Months Ended March 31, 2011  
                            Commercial     Consumer              
    Residential           Home     Commercial     Business     Non-Real              
    Mortgages     Construction     Equity     Mortgages     Loans     Estate     Unallocated     Totals  
 
Beginning Balance, December 31, 2010
  $ 947     $ 8     $ 457     $ 983     $ 130     $ 10     $ 104     $ 2,639  
Charge-offs
    (15 )                             (6 )           (21 )
Recoveries
                                  2             2  
Provisions
    60       1       43       (23 )     (13 )     4       103       175  
 
                                               
 
                                                               
Ending balance, March 31, 2011
  $ 992     $ 9     $ 500     $ 960     $ 117     $ 10     $ 207     $ 2,795  
 
                                               
 
                                                               
Ending balance:
                                                               
Individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 317     $     $ 147     $ 105     $     $ 5     $     $ 574  
 
                                                               
Ending balance:
                                                               
Collectively evaluated for impairment
  $ 675     $ 9     $ 353     $ 855     $ 117     $ 5     $ 207     $ 2,221  
 
                                                               
Loans:
                                                               
Ending balance:
  $ 332,219     $ 6,129     $ 85,958     $ 79,203     $ 6,442     $ 1,125     $     $ 511,076  
 
                                                               
Ending balance:
                                                               
Individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 2,794     $     $ 212     $ 232     $     $ 5     $     $ 3,243  
 
                                                               
Ending balance:
                                                               
Collectively evaluated for impairment
  $ 329,425     $ 6,129     $ 85,746     $ 78,971     $ 6,442     $ 1,120     $     $ 507,833  

 

page -18-


Table of Contents

The following table presents nonaccrual loans by classes of the loan portfolio as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
                 
    (In Thousands)  
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Residential Mortgages
  $ 2,582     $ 2,392  
Construction
           
Home Equity
           
Commercial Mortgages
    232       312  
Commercial Business Loans
           
Consumer Non-Real Estate
    5       6  
 
           
Total
  $ 2,819     $ 2,710  
 
           
4. Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
Federal law requires a member institution of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) to hold stock of its district FHLB according to a predetermined formula. The restricted stock is carried at cost. In December 2008, the FHLB of Pittsburgh notified member banks that it was suspending dividend payments and the repurchase of capital stock. During 2010 and 2011, the FHLB allowed certain redemptions.
Management’s determination of whether these investments are impaired is based on their assessment of the ultimate recoverability of their cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the FHLB.
Management believes no impairment charge is necessary related to the FHLB restricted stock as of March 31, 2011.
5. DEPOSITS
Deposits are summarized as follows:
                 
    (In Thousands)  
    March 31,     September 31,  
    2011     2010  
Non-interest bearing checking accounts
  $ 18,171     $ 17,015  
Now accounts
    28,000       21,320  
Interest bearing checking accounts
    35,527       32,577  
Money market deposit accounts
    134,216       136,079  
Passbook and club accounts
    4,012       3,739  
Certificate of deposits
    311,346       317,370  
 
           
Total Deposits
  $ 531,272     $ 528,100  
 
           
The aggregate amount of certificate accounts in denominations of $100,000 or more at March 31, 2011 and September 31, 2010 amounted to approximately $64.4 million and $59.2 million, respectively.

 

page -19-


Table of Contents

6. COMMITMENTS
At March 31, 2011, the following commitments were outstanding:
         
    (In thousands)  
Letters of credit
  $ 405  
Commitments to originate loans
    23,265  
Unused portion of home equity lines of credits
    55,095  
Unused portion of commercial lines of credits
    6,641  
Undisbursed portion of construction loans in process
    2,933  
 
     
Total
  $ 88,339  
 
     
Outstanding letters of credit written are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The majority of these standby letters of credit expire within the next twelve months. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending other loan commitments. The Company requires collateral supporting these letters of credit as deemed necessary. Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of such collateral would be sufficient to cover the maximum potential amount of future payments required under the corresponding guarantees. The current amount of the liability as of March 31, 2011 for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued is not material.
7. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following shares were used for the computation of earnings per share:
                                 
    For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
    March 31,     March 31,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
Basic
    3,723,236       3,654,047       3,708,140       3,643,583  
Diluted
    3,758,260       3,670,280       3,741,864       3,658,087  
The difference between the number of shares used for computation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share represents the dilutive effect of stock options. There were 226,653 stock options that were anti-dilutive for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2011, respectively. There were 229,583 stock options that were anti-dilutive for the three and six months periods ended March 31, 2010, respectively.

 

page -20-


Table of Contents

8. LONG-TERM DEBT
Advances consists of the following:
                                 
    March 31,     September 30,  
    2011     2010  
    (In thousands)  
            Weighted             Weighted  
            Interest             Interest  
Maturing Period   Amount     Rate     Amount     Rate  
 
                               
1 to 12 months
  $ 30,688       4.43 %   $ 15,923       4.37 %
13 to 24 months
    42,909       4.34 %     54,440       4.50 %
25 to 36 months
    52,651       4.15 %     35,022       4.03 %
37 to 48 months
    3,009       3.58 %     28,729       4.10 %
49 to 60 months
    15,000       3.89 %     18,356       3.83 %
61 to 72 months
    35,000       4.86 %     10,000       4.71 %
73 to 84 months
    55,000       4.43 %     45,000       4.52 %
85 to 120 months
    29,375       4.05 %     64,577       4.38 %
 
                       
 
                               
Total
  $ 263,632       4.33 %   $ 272,047       4.33 %
 
                       
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances are collateralized by Federal Home Loan Bank stock and substantially all first mortgage loans. The Company has a line of credit with the FHLB of which $0 out of $75.0 million was used at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively. Included in the table above at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 are convertible advances whereby the FHLB has the option at a predetermined strike rate to convert the fixed interest rate to an adjustable rate tied to London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The Company then has the option to repay these advances if the FHLB converts the interest rate. These advances are included in the periods in which they mature. The Company has a total FHLB borrowing capacity of $500.3 million of which $213.6 was used as of March 31, 2011. In addition, there are four long-term advances from other financial institutions totaling $50 million that are secured by investment and mortgage-backed securities.
9. REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory — and possibly additional discretionary — actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to assets (as defined). Management believes, as of March 31, 2011, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

 

page -21-


Table of Contents

As of March 31, 2011, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Company and Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.
The Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the table. The Company’s capital ratios are not significantly different than the Bank’s disclosed below.
                                                 
                                    To Be Considered Well  
                                    Capitalized Under  
                    For Capital     Prompt Corrective  
    Actual     Adequacy Purposes     Action Provisions  
(Dollars in Thousands)   Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio  
 
At March 31, 2011
                                               
Tier 1 Capital (to assets)
  $ 54,973       6.45 %   $ 34,112       4.00 %   $ 42,641       5.00 %
Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets)
    54,973       11.75 %     18,719       4.00 %     28,079       6.00 %
Total Capital (to risk weighted assets)
    57,786       12.35 %     37,439       8.00 %     46,799       10.00 %
 
                                               
At September 30, 2010
                                               
Tier 1 Capital (to assets)
  $ 53,330       6.19 %   $ 34,440       4.00 %   $ 43,050       5.00 %
Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets)
    55,330       11.35 %     18,799       4.00 %     28,199       6.00 %
Total Capital (to risk weighted assets)
    55,834       11.88 %     37,599       8.00 %     46,999       10.00 %
10. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DISCLOSURES
The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with accounting guidance, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumption used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.
The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is determined at a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

 

page -22-


Table of Contents

The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under are as follows:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity).
An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
                                 
            (Level 1)     (Level 2)        
            Quoted Prices in     Significant     (Level 3)  
            Active Markets     Other     Significant  
    March 31,     for Identical     Observable     Unobservable  
Description   2011     Assets     Inputs     Inputs  
 
Equity securities
  $ 396     $ 396     $     $  
U.S. Government money market funds
    9,634       9,634              
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    830             830        
 
                       
Total available for sale securities
  $ 10,860     $ 10,030     $ 830     $  
 
                       
                                 
            (Level 1)              
            Quoted Prices in     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
            Active Markets     Significant Other     Significant  
    September 30,     for Identical     Observable     Unobservable  
Description   2010     Assets     Inputs     Inputs  
 
Equity securities
  $ 343     $ 343     $     $  
U.S. Government money market funds
    20,261       20,261              
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    809             809        
 
                       
Total available for sale securities
  $ 21,413     $ 20,604     $ 809     $  
 
                       
There were no transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

 

page -23-


Table of Contents

For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 are as follows:
For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 are as follows:
                                 
            (Level 1)              
            Quoted Prices in     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
            Active Markets     Significant Other     Significant  
    March 31,     for Identical     Observable     Unobservable  
Description   2011     Assets     Inputs     Inputs  
 
                               
Impaired Loans
  $ 1,474     $     $     $ 1,474  
 
                       
                                 
            (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
            Quoted Prices in     Significant Other     Significant  
    September 30,     Active Markets for     Observable     Unobservable  
Description   2010     Identical Assets     Inputs     Inputs  
 
                               
Impaired Loans
  $ 186     $     $     $ 186  
 
                       
The following valuation techniques were used to measure fair value of the Company’s financial instruments in the tables above and below:
Cash and Cash Equivalents (Carried at Cost)
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents approximate those assets’ fair values.
Securities
The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) and held to maturity (carried at amortized cost) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.
Loans Receivable (Carried at Cost)
The fair values of loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans. Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal. Generally, for variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.
Impaired loans are those loans which the Company has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock (Carried at Cost)
The carrying amount of this restricted investment in bank stock approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.

 

page -24-


Table of Contents

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable (Carried at Cost)
The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.
Deposit Liabilities (Carried at Cost)
The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of a aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Borrowings (Carried at Cost)
Fair values of borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity. These prices obtained from this active market represent a market value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments (Disclosed at Cost)
Fair values for the Company’s off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments and letters of credit) are based on fees currently charged in the market to enter into similar agreements, taking into account, the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. The fair value of these off-balance sheet financial instruments are not considered material as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010.
The estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessarily required to interpret the data to develop the estimates.
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments as of March 31, 2011 and September 30, 2010 are as follows.

 

page -25-


Table of Contents

                                 
    March 31, 2011     September 30, 2010  
    Carrying     Estimated Fair     Carrying     Estimated Fair  
(In Thousands)   Amount     Value     Amount     Value  
Assets:
                               
 
                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 23,960     $ 23,960     $ 20,190     $ 20,190  
Securities held to maturity
    271,744       275,116       256,088       264,448  
Securities available-for-sale
    10,860       10,860       21,413       21,413  
Loans receivable — net
    501,180       519,914       510,093       530,294  
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
    14,526       14,526       16,096       16,096  
Accrued interest receivable
    3,167       3,167       3,210       3,210  
 
                               
Liabilities:
                               
Checking, passbook, club and NOW deposit accounts
    85,710       85,710       74,651       74,651  
Money Market deposit accounts
    134,216       134,216       136,079       136,079  
Certificate of deposit accounts
    311,346       320,146       317,370       325,881  
Borrowings
    263,632       282,827       272,047       291,857  
Accrued interest payable
    1,333       1,333       1,407       1,407  
 
                               
Off balance sheet financial instruments
                       
Limitations
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on many judgments. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
Fair value estimates are based on existing on and off-balance-sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments include deferred income taxes and premises and equipment. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been and have not been considered in the estimate.
Item 2.  
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This report contains certain forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company that are based on the beliefs of management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management. In addition, in those and other portions of this document, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “should” and similar expressions, or the negative thereof, as they relate to the Company or the Company’s management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current views of the Company with respect to future-looking events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected or intended. The Company does not intend to update these forward-looking statements.

 

page -26-


Table of Contents

The Company’s business consists of attracting deposits from the general public through a variety of deposit programs and investing such deposits principally in first mortgage loans secured by residential properties, commercial loans and commercial lines of credit in the Company’s primary market area. The Company also originates a variety of consumer loans, predominately home equity loans and lines of credit also secured by residential properties in the Company’s primary lending area. The Company serves its customers through its full-service branch network as well as through remote ATM locations, the internet and telephone banking.
Critical Accounting Policies and Judgments
The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared based on the application of certain accounting policies. Certain of these policies require numerous estimates and strategic or economic assumptions that may prove inaccurate or subject to variations and may significantly affect the Company’s reported results and financial position for the period or in future periods. Changes in underlying factors, assumptions, or estimates in any of these areas could have a material impact on the Company’s future financial condition and results of operations. The Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements: allowance for loan losses, other-than-temporary security impairment and deferred income taxes.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses — The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The Company evaluates the need to establish allowances against losses on loans on a monthly basis. When additional allowances are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings.
Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses consists of three key elements: (1) specific allowances for certain impaired loans; (2) a general valuation allowance on certain identified problem loans; and (3) a general valuation allowance on the remainder of the loan portfolio. Although we determine the amount of each element of the allowance separately, the entire allowance for loan losses is available for the entire portfolio.
Specific Allowance Required for Certain Impaired Loans: We establish an allowance for certain impaired loans for the amounts by which the collateral value, present value of future cash flows or observable market price are lower than the carrying value of the loan. Under current accounting guidelines, a loan is defined as impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
General Valuation Allowance on Certain Identified Problem Loans — We also establish a general allowance for classified loans that do not have an individual allowance. We segregate these loans by loan category and assign allowance percentages to each category based on inherent losses associated with each type of lending and consideration that these loans, in the aggregate, represent an above-average credit risk and that more of these loans will prove to be uncollectible compared to loans in the general portfolio.
General Valuation Allowance on the Remainder of the Loan Portfolio — We establish another general allowance for loans that are not classified to recognize the inherent losses associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, has not been allocated to particular problem assets. This general valuation allowance is determined by segregating the loans by loan category and assigning allowance percentages based on our historical loss experience, delinquency trends and management’s evaluation of the collectibility of the loan portfolio. The allowance may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, affect the collectability of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary lending areas, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are reevaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current economic environment.

 

page -27-


Table of Contents

Other-than-Temporary Impairment of Investment Securities
Securities are evaluated periodically to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. Management utilizes criteria such as the magnitude and duration of the decline, in addition to the reasons underlying the decline, to determine whether the loss in value is other-than-temporary. The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment.
In evaluating our ability to recover deferred tax assets, management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including our past operating results and our forecast of future taxable income. In determining future taxable income, management makes assumptions for the amount of taxable income, the reversal of temporary differences and the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require us to make judgments about our future taxable income and are consistent with the plans and estimates we use to manage our business. Any reduction in estimated future taxable income may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. An increase in the valuation allowance would result in additional income tax expense in the period and could have a significant impact on our future earnings.
Changes in Financial Position for the Six-Month Period Ended March 31, 2011
Total assets at March 31, 2011 were $856.5 million, a decrease of $662,000 for the six-month period then ended. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in loans receivable of approximately $8.9 million, investments available for sale of $10.6 million and repurchase of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock of $1.6 million. The decrease in assets was partially offset by an increase in cash and investments held to maturity of $19.4 million.
There was a growth in deposits during the six-month period ended March 31, 2011. Total deposits increased $3.2 million to $531.3 million. Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance also increased by $3.2 million due to the timing of property tax payments. The increase was primarily offset by a decrease in borrowings of $8.4 million due to normal repayments for the period.
Comparisons of Results of Operations for the Three Month and Six Month Period Ended March 31, 2011 with the Three Month and Six Month Period Ended March 31, 2010
Net Income
Net income for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 was $1.1 million compared to $1.2 millions for the comparable period in 2010. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the period ending March 31, 2011 was $0.29. Net income for the six-month period ended March 31, 2011 was $2.3 million compared to $2.4 million for the comparable period in 2010. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the six-month period ended March 31, 2011 was $0.62 compared to $0.65 for the comparable period in 2010.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income was $4.5 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to $4.5 million for the comparable period in 2010. Net interest income increased to $9.0 million for the six-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to $8.9 million for the comparable period in 2010 due to a reduction in the cost of funds on interest-bearing liabilities.

 

page -28-


Table of Contents

Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income slightly decreased to $432,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 from $458,000 for the comparable period in 2010. Non-interest income decreased to $933,000 for the six-month period ended March 31, 2010 from $960,000 for the comparable period in 2010. The decreases are primarily due to reduction in income on non-deposit products.
Non-Interest Expenses
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2011, non-interest expenses increased by $110,000 or 3.41% to $3.3 million compared to $3.2 million for the same period in 2010. For the six month period ended March 31, 2011, non-interest expenses increased by $202,000 or 3.21% to $6.5 million compared to $6.3 million for the same period in 2010. Salary and employee benefits increased $133,000 to $1.9 million and $193,000 to $3.6 million for the three and six month period ended March 31, 2011. These increases are primarily due to salary increases and additional employee benefits expense. Occupancy and equipment also increased $32,000 and $85,000 for the three and six month period due to building maintenance and depreciation expense for our Souderton Branch which opened in March 2010. FDIC insurance expense increased to $263,000 and $489,000 for the three and six month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to $226,000 and $453,000 for the same periods in 2010 due to an increase in deposits. Other expenses decreased by $86,000 and $120,000 for the three and six month period ended March 31, 2011. The decrease was primarily due to prior year’s expense relating to the sale of REO properties. The annualized ratio of non-interest expenses to average assets for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were 1.56%, 1.52% and 1.54%, 1.48%, respectively.
Income Taxes
The Company made provisions for income taxes of $350,000 and $779,000 for the three-month and six-month period ended March 31, 2011, compared to $437,000 and $892,000 for the comparable periods in 2010. These provisions are based on the levels of pre-tax income, adjusted primarily for tax-exempt interest income on investments.
Liquidity and Capital Recourses
For a financial institution, liquidity is a measure of the ability to fund customers’ needs for loans and deposit withdrawals. Harleysville Savings Bank regularly evaluates economic conditions in order to maintain a strong liquidity position. One of the most significant factors considered by management when evaluating liquidity requirements is the stability of the Bank’s core deposit base. In addition to cash, the Bank maintains a portfolio of short-term investments to meet its liquidity requirements.
Harleysville Savings also relies upon cash flow from operations and other financing activities, generally short-term and long-term debt. Liquidity is also provided by investing activities including the repayment and maturity of loans and investment securities as well as the management of asset sales when considered necessary. The Bank also has access to and sufficient assets to secure lines of credit and other borrowings in amounts adequate to fund any unexpected cash requirements.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had $88.3 million in commitments to fund loan originations, disburse loans in process and meet other obligations. Management anticipates that the majority of these commitments will be funded within the next six months by means of normal cash flows and new deposits.

 

page -29-


Table of Contents

The Company invests excess funds in overnight deposits and other short-term interest-earning assets, which provide liquidity to meet lending requirements. The Company also has available borrowings with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh up to the Company’s maximum borrowing capacity, which was $500.3 million at March 31, 2011 of which $213.6 was outstanding at March 31, 2011.
The Bank’s net income for the six months ended March 31, 2011 is $2.3 million compared to $2.4 million for the comparable period 2010. This increased the Bank’s stockholder’s equity to $55.0 million or 6.42% of total assets. This amount is well in excess of the Bank’s minimum regulatory capital requirement.
Item 3.  
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company has instituted programs designed to decrease the sensitivity of its earnings to material and prolonged increases in interest rates. The principal determinant of the exposure of the Company’s earnings to interest rate risk is the timing difference between the repricing or maturity of the Company’s interest-earning assets and the repricing or maturity of its interest-bearing liabilities. If the maturities of such assets and liabilities were perfectly matched, and if the interest rates borne by its assets and liabilities were equally flexible and moved concurrently, neither of which is the case, the impact on net interest income of rapid increases or decreases in interest rates would be minimized. The Company’s asset and liability management policies seek to decrease the interest rate sensitivity by shortening the repricing intervals and the maturities of the Company’s interest-earning assets. Although management of the Company believes that the steps taken have reduced the Company’s overall vulnerability to increases in interest rates, the Company remains vulnerable to material and prolonged increases in interest rates during periods in which its interest rate sensitive liabilities exceed its interest rate sensitive assets. The authority and responsibility for interest rate management is vested in the Company’s Board of Directors. The Chief Executive Officer implements the Board of Directors’ policies during the day-to-day operations of the Company.
Each month, the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) presents the Board of Directors with a report, which outlines the Company’s asset and liability “gap” position in various time periods. The “gap” is the difference between interest- earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities which mature or reprice over a given time period.
The CFO also meets weekly with the Company’s other senior officers to review and establish policies and strategies designed to regulate the Company’s flow of funds and coordinate the sources, uses and pricing of such funds. The first priority in structuring and pricing the Company’s assets and liabilities is to maintain an acceptable interest rate spread while reducing the effects of changes in interest rates and maintaining the quality of the Company’s assets.
The following table summarizes the amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities outstanding as of March 31, 2011, which are expected to mature, prepay or reprice in each of the future time periods shown. Except as stated below, the amounts of assets or liabilities shown which mature or reprice during a particular period were determined in accordance with the contractual terms of the asset or liability. Adjustable and floating-rate assets are included in the period in which interest rates are next scheduled to adjust rather than in the period in which they are due and fixed-rate loans and mortgage-backed securities are included in the periods in which they are anticipated to be repaid.
The passbook accounts, negotiable order of withdrawal (“NOW”) accounts, interest bearing accounts, and money market deposit accounts, are included in the “Over 5 Years” categories based on management’s beliefs that these funds are core deposits having significantly longer effective maturities based on the Company’s retention of such deposits in changing interest rate environments.

 

page -30-


Table of Contents

Generally, during a period of rising interest rates, a positive gap would result in an increase in net interest income while a negative gap would adversely affect net interest income. Conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, a positive gap would result in a decrease in net interest income while a negative gap would positively affect net interest income. However, the following table does not necessarily indicate the impact of general interest rate movements on the Company’s’ net interest income because the repricing of certain categories of assets and liabilities is discretionary and is subject to competitive and other pressures. As a result, certain assets and liabilities indicated as repricing within a stated period may in fact reprice at different rate levels.
                                         
    1 Year     1 to 3     3 to 5     Over 5        
(In thousands)   or less     Years     Years     Years     Total  
Interest-earning assets:
                                       
Mortgage loans
  $ 53,937     $ 55,660     $ 44,584     $ 178,038     $ 332,219  
Commercial loans
    36,883       9,268       25,247       14,247       85,645  
Mortgage-backed securities
    57,825       44,298       21,708       20,855       144,686  
Consumer and other loans
    65,794       11,061       5,217       11,140       93,212  
Investment securities and other investments
    60,901       28,021       46,839       36,167       171,928  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total interest-earning assets
    275,340       148,308       143,595       260,447       827,690  
 
                             
 
                                       
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                       
Passbook and Club accounts
    379                   3,633       4,012  
NOW and checking accounts
    6,353                   57,174       63,527  
Consumer Money Market Deposit accounts
    55,074                   56,718       111,792  
Business Money Market Deposit accounts
    16,818                   5,606       22,424  
Certificate accounts
    170,460       95,636       45,250             311,346  
Borrowed money
    36,404       93,369       16,762       117,097       263,632  
 
                             
 
                                       
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    285,488       189,005       62,012       240,228       776,733  
 
                             
 
                                       
Repricing GAP during the period
  $ (10,148 )   $ (40,697 )   $ 81,583     $ 20,219     $ 50,957  
 
                             
 
                                       
Cumulative GAP
  $ (10,148 )   $ (50,845 )   $ 30,738     $ 50,957          
 
                               
 
                                       
Ratio of GAP during the period to total assets
    -1.18 %     -4.75 %     9.53 %     2.36 %        
 
                               
 
Ratio of cumulative GAP to total assets
    -1.18 %     -5.94 %     3.59 %     5.95 %        
 
                               

 

page -31-


Table of Contents

Item 4.  
Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and regulations and are operating in an effective manner.
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

page -32-


Table of Contents

Part II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.  
Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. It is the opinion of management that these matters will not materially affect the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Item 1A.  
Risk Factors
Not applicable.
Item 2.  
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3.  
Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4.  
(Removed and Reserved)
Item 5.  
Other information.
Not applicable.
Item 6.  
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
         
No.
  31.1    
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
  31.2    
Certification of Chief Operating and Finance Officer
  32.0    
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating and Finance Officer

 

page -33-


Table of Contents

Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  HARLEYSVILLE SAVINGS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 
 
Date: May 13, 2011  By:   /s/ Ronald B. Geib    
    Ronald B. Geib   
    Chief Executive Officer   
 
Date: May 13, 2011  By:   /s/ Brendan J. McGill    
    Brendan J. McGill   
    Executive Vice President
Chief Operating and Financial Officer
 
 

 

page -34-