e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-33556
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
41-2232463 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
5400 Westheimer Court
Houston, Texas 77056
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
713-627-5400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a
non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Yes o No þ
There were 44,640,245 Common Units, 21,638,730 Subordinated Units and 1,352,421 General Partner
Units outstanding as of November 1, 2007.
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
September 30, 2007
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
2
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This document includes forward-looking statements that are based on managements beliefs and
assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by terms and phrases such as
anticipate, believe, intend, estimate, expect, continue, should, could, may,
plan, project, predict, will, potential, forecast, and similar expressions.
Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to be
materially different from the results predicted. Factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those indicated in any forward-looking statement include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
state and federal legislative and regulatory initiatives that affect cost and
investment recovery, have an effect on rate structure, and affect the speed at and
degree to which competition enters the natural gas industries; |
|
|
|
|
the outcomes of litigation and regulatory investigations, proceedings or
inquiries; |
|
|
|
|
the weather and other natural phenomena, including the economic, operational
and other effects of hurricanes and storms; |
|
|
|
|
the timing and extent of changes in interest rates; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions, including any potential effects arising from
terrorist attacks and any consequential hostilities or other hostilities; |
|
|
|
|
changes in environmental, safety and other laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
|
the results of financing efforts, including the ability to obtain financing on
favorable terms, which can be affected by various factors, including credit ratings and
general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
growth in opportunities, including the timing and success of efforts to develop
domestic pipeline, storage, and other infrastructure projects and the effects of
competition; |
|
|
|
|
the performance of natural gas transmission and storage facilities; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by accounting
standard-setting bodies; |
|
|
|
|
conditions of the capital markets during the periods covered by the
forward-looking statements; and |
|
|
|
|
the ability to successfully complete merger, acquisition or divestiture plans;
regulatory or other limitations imposed as a result of a merger, acquisition or
divestiture; and the success of the business following a merger, acquisition or
divestiture. |
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the
forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different
time than Spectra Energy Partners, LP has described. Spectra Energy Partners, LP undertakes no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except per-unit amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation of natural gas |
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
|
$ |
18.6 |
|
|
$ |
72.4 |
|
|
$ |
58.0 |
|
Storage of liquefied natural gas and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
73.9 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating, maintenance and other |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of Gulfstream |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
Equity in earnings of Market Hub |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
Other income and expenses, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and expenses |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
53.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) |
|
|
(110.4 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(99.8 |
) |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
134.3 |
|
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
|
$ |
175.1 |
|
|
$ |
44.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of Limited Partners Interest in Net
Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(a) |
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
|
|
n/a |
(b) |
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
|
|
n/a |
(b) |
Less general partners interest in net income |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net income per limited partner unit |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Weighted average limited partners units outstanding
Basic and Diluted |
|
|
66.3 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
66.3 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflective of general and limited partners interest in net income since
the closing of the Companys initial
public offering. See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
(b) |
|
not applicable |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
17.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
184.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
Taxes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
216.5 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates |
|
|
490.8 |
|
|
|
442.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
118.3 |
|
|
|
118.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
813.7 |
|
|
|
800.0 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
123.2 |
|
|
|
108.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
690.5 |
|
|
|
691.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Assets and Deferred Debits |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,527.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,284.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except number of units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL / PARENT NET EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
7.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
Taxes accrued |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Interest accrued |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Natural gas imbalance payables |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
459.0 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
113.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred credits and other liabilities |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
119.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Capital / Parent Net Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units (44,640,245 units issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2007) |
|
|
703.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated units (21,638,730 units issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2007) |
|
|
306.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
General partner units (1,352,421 units issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2007) |
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Parent net investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
985.3 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital / parent net equity |
|
|
1,032.7 |
|
|
|
989.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Partners Capital / Parent Net Equity |
|
$ |
1,527.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,284.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
175.1 |
|
|
$ |
44.9 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(41.5 |
) |
|
|
(28.7 |
) |
Distributions received from equity investments |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(104.8 |
) |
|
|
10.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
59.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
|
|
(69.9 |
) |
Investment expenditures |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(1,132.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
948.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(218.2 |
) |
|
|
(69.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
319.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common units |
|
|
230.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Members dividends |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transfers from (to) parent |
|
|
(345.0 |
) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
181.5 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
17.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS CAPITAL / PARENT NET EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Capital |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Net |
|
|
Limited Partners |
|
|
General |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
Partner |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
985.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
989.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
the period January 1, 2007
through July 2, 2007 |
|
|
151.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151.3 |
|
Members distributions |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
Transfers to parent |
|
|
(348.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(348.8 |
) |
Conversion to Spectra Energy
Partners, LP |
|
|
(775.3 |
) |
|
|
457.7 |
|
|
|
298.9 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
230.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230.0 |
|
Net income attributable to
the period July 3, 2007
through September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
Reclassification of cash
flow hedges into earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30,
2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
703.4 |
|
|
$ |
306.5 |
|
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,032.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
891.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
895.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
Transfer from affiliate |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Transfers from parent, net |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Reclassification of cash
flow hedges into earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30,
2006 |
|
$ |
955.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
958.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
8
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. General
Nature of Operations. Spectra Energy Partners, LP, through its subsidiaries and equity
affiliates (collectively, the Company) is engaged in the transportation of natural gas through
interstate pipeline systems that serve the southeastern United States, and the storage of natural
gas in underground facilities that are located in southeast Texas and in south central Louisiana.
Spectra Energy Partners, LP is a Delaware master limited partnership formed on March 19, 2007.
Initial Public Offering. On July 2, 2007, immediately prior to the closing of the Companys
initial public offering (IPO), Spectra Energy Corp (Spectra Energy) contributed to Spectra Energy
Partners, LP 100% of the ownership of East Tennessee Natural Gas LLC (East Tennessee), 50% of the
ownership of Market Hub Partners Holding, LLC (Market Hub) and a 24.5% interest in Gulfstream
Natural Gas System, L.L.C. (Gulfstream). Spectra Energy indirectly owned 100% of Spectra Energy
Partners, LP prior to the closing of the IPO.
On July 2, 2007, the Company completed its IPO. The Company issued 11.5 million common units
to the public, representing 17% of its outstanding equity. Net cash of approximately $230.0 million
was received by the Company upon closing of the IPO. Spectra Energy retained an 83% equity interest
in the Company, including its common units, subordinated units and a 2% general partner interest.
Approximately $26.0 million of these proceeds was distributed to Spectra Energy, $194.0 million was
used to purchase qualifying investment-grade securities, and $10.0 million was retained by the
Company to meet working capital requirements. Also on July 2, 2007, the Company borrowed $194.0
million in term debt using the investment-grade securities as collateral and borrowed an additional
$125.0 million of revolving debt. Proceeds from these borrowings, totaling $319.0 million, were
distributed to Spectra Energy.
Basis of Presentation. For periods prior to the closing of the IPO on July 2, 2007, the
consolidated financial statements presented herein were prepared from the separate records
maintained by East Tennessee, Market Hub and Gulfstream, the entities that were contributed to the
Company by Spectra Energy and which are herein referred to as Spectra Energy Partners Predecessor,
and are based on Spectra Energys historical ownership percentages of the operations that were
contributed. Spectra Energy Partners Predecessor is treated as the predecessor entity to the
Company for financial statement reporting purposes. The financial statements covering periods
prior to the closing of the IPO may not necessarily be indicative of the actual results of
operations had those contributed entities been operated separately during those periods. Because a
direct ownership relationship did not exist among the entities comprising the Company prior to July
2, 2007, the net investment in the Company is shown as Parent Net Investment in lieu of owners
equity in the consolidated financial statements for those periods.
The Company accounts for investments in 20% to 50% owned affiliates, and investments in less
than 20% owned affiliates where the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence,
under the equity method. Accordingly, the consolidated historical financial statements for the
Company reflect the inclusion of East Tennessee, and investments in Market Hub and Gulfstream using
the equity method of accounting. All intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Spectra Energy Partners
Predecessor financial statements included in the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, as
amended, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 22, 2007. These interim
financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of
management, necessary to fairly present the Companys results of operations and financial position.
Amounts reported in the interim Consolidated Statements of Operations are not necessarily
indicative of amounts expected for the respective annual periods.
9
Use of Estimates. To conform to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United
States, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Although these
estimates are based on managements best available knowledge at the time, actual results could
differ.
2. Transactions with Affiliates
In the normal course of business, the Company provides natural gas transportation, storage and
other services to Spectra Energy and its affiliates. In addition, pursuant to an agreement with
Spectra Energy, Spectra Energy and its affiliates perform centralized corporate functions for the
Company, including legal, accounting, compliance, treasury, information technology and other areas.
The Company reimburses Spectra Energy for the expenses to provide these services as well as other
expenses it incurs on the Companys behalf, such as salaries of personnel performing services for
the Companys benefit and the cost of employee benefits and general and administrative expenses
associated with such personnel, capital expenditures, maintenance and repair costs, taxes and
direct expenses, including operating expenses and certain allocated operating expenses associated
with the ownership and operation of the contributed assets. Spectra Energy and its affiliates
charge such expenses based on the cost of actual services provided or using various allocation
methodologies based on the Companys percentage of assets, employees, earnings or other measures,
as compared to Spectras other affiliates. Management believes the allocation methodologies are
reasonable.
Transactions with affiliates are summarized in the tables below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Operating, maintenance and other |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Receivables |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
Taxes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Taxes accrued |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Natural gas imbalance payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
In March 2006, Spectra Energy Gas Services (SEGS), formerly Duke Energy Gas Services, an
affiliated company, contributed to East Tennessee approximately 34 miles of 10-inch diameter
pipeline running from Lee County, Virginia to an interconnection with the Companys Hawkins County
Lateral in Rogersville, Tennessee at a net book value of $8.5 million by a non-cash, equity
transfer between the affiliated companies. Associated deferred taxes of $3.0 million related to
such assets were transferred to the Company from SEGS. These assets were part of SEGS Stone
Mountain system. The remaining Stone Mountain system assets were sold by SEGS to an unrelated third
party.
3. Income Taxes
The Companys East Tennessee operations were subject to corporate income tax under tax sharing
agreements with Spectra Energy in 2007 and with Duke Energy Corporation (Duke Energy) in 2006 prior
to the spin-off of Spectra Energy from Duke Energy on January 2, 2007. During those periods,
income taxes were calculated by the Company on the basis of its separate company income and
deductions related to East Tennessee in accordance with respective established practices of Spectra
Energy and Duke Energy.
10
In conjunction with the contribution by Spectra Energy of the ownership of East Tennessee to
the Company immediately prior to the IPO, $110.5 million of accumulated deferred federal income tax
liabilities outstanding at June 30, 2007 were eliminated and recorded as a benefit to Income Tax
Expense (Benefit) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Effective July 2, 2007, as a
result of the Companys master limited partnership structure, the Company is no longer subject to
federal income taxes, but is still subject to Tennessee state income
tax.
Market Hub and Gulfstream are not subject to income tax. These entities taxable income or
loss are reported on the respective income tax returns of the respective members. Accordingly,
there is no tax provision related to those entities in these consolidated financial statements.
The Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109, (FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. The implementation of FIN 48 had no material
impact on the consolidated financial statements. No material increases or decreases related to
uncertain tax benefits were recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
4. Business Segments
The Companys operations are organized into one business segment: East Tennessee. The
Companys business segment is considered the sole reportable segment under the guidance of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information.
East Tennessee provides interstate transportation of natural gas and the storage and
redelivery of liquefied natural gas (LNG) for customers in the southeastern United States. These
operations are primarily subject to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the U.S.
Department of Transportations (DOT) rules and regulations.
The remainder of the Companys operations is presented as Other. While it is not considered
a business segment, Other primarily includes the Companys equity investments in Gulfstream and
Market Hub, and certain unallocated corporate costs.
Market Hub owns and operates two natural gas storage facilities, Moss Bluff and Egan, which
are located in Southeast Texas and South Central Louisiana, respectively. Market Hubs operations
are subject to the rules and regulations of FERC, the Texas Railroad Commission and DOT. Gulfstream
provides interstate natural gas pipeline transportation for customers in central and southern
Florida. Gulfstreams operations are subject to the rules and regulations of FERC and DOT.
Management evaluates segment performance primarily based on earnings before interest and taxes
from continuing operations (EBIT). On a segment basis, EBIT represents all profits from continuing
operations (both operating and non-operating) before deducting interest and taxes.
11
Business Segment Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Operating
revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Tennessee |
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
|
$ |
18.6 |
|
|
$ |
73.9 |
|
|
$ |
59.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
|
$ |
18.6 |
|
|
$ |
73.9 |
|
|
$ |
59.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
EBIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Tennessee |
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
42.8 |
|
|
$ |
31.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
40.5 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total EBIT |
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
83.3 |
|
|
|
59.9 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
75.3 |
|
|
$ |
53.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Tennessee |
|
$ |
834.3 |
|
|
$ |
841.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
693.5 |
|
|
|
442.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,527.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,284.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes net income and all other non-owner changes in equity. Components
of comprehensive income are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
134.3 |
|
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
|
$ |
175.1 |
|
|
$ |
44.9 |
|
Reclassification of cash flow hedges into earnings |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
134.2 |
|
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
|
$ |
174.9 |
|
|
$ |
44.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Earnings per Limited Partner Unit and Cash
Distributions
The Company calculates net income per limited partner unit in accordance with Emerging Issues
Task Force Issue No. 03-6
(EITF
No. 03-6), Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under
FASB Statement No. 128. Undistributed earnings for a period are allocated to a participating
security based on the contractual participation rights of the security to share in those earnings
as if all of the earnings for the period had been distributed.
Earnings per limited partner unit is computed by dividing the limited partners interest in
net income by the weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding. The limited
partners interest in net income is determined by first allocating net income (post-close of the
IPO) to the general partner based upon the general partners ownership interest of 2%. Diluted
earnings per limited partner unit reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or
other agreements to issue common units, such as phantom
12
unit awards, were exercised, settled or converted into common units. The weighted-average
number of units used to calculate diluted earnings per limited partner unit for the three months
ended September 30, 2007 includes the effect of 19,731 phantom units.
The following table presents the Companys earnings per limited partner unit calculations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three and Nine |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
(In millions, except per-unit amounts) |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
Net income (post-close of the IPO) |
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
Less general partners interest in net income |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocable to common units |
|
$ |
15.7 |
|
Net income allocable to subordinated units |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding -
basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
Common units |
|
|
44.7 |
|
Subordinated units |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
66.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per limited partner unit basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
Common units |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
Subordinated units |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
Earnings per limited partner unit data is only presented for periods since the Companys IPO
on July 2, 2007. See Note 1 for further discussion of the IPO. The net income impact of the third
quarter 2007 elimination of $110.5 million of accumulated deferred federal income tax liabilities
as discussed in Note 3 is excluded from the calculation of earnings per limited partner unit since
the elimination occurred immediately prior to the closing of the Companys IPO.
The partnership agreement requires that, within 45 days after the end of each quarter, the
Company distribute all of its available cash to unitholders of record on the applicable record
date. As further discussed in Note 14, the first quarterly cash distribution was declared in October 2007.
Available Cash. Available cash, for any quarter, consists of all cash on hand at the end of
that quarter:
|
|
|
less the amount of cash reserves established by the general partner to: |
|
|
|
provide for the proper conduct of business, |
|
|
|
|
comply with applicable law, any debt instrument or other agreement, or |
|
|
|
|
provide funds for distributions to the unitholders and to the general partner for
any one or more of the next four quarters, |
|
|
|
plus, if the general partner so determines, all or a portion of cash on hand on the
date of determination of available cash for the quarter. |
13
Subordinated Units. All of the subordinated units are held by a wholly owned subsidiary of
Spectra Energy. The partnership agreement provides that, during the subordination period, the
common units have the right to receive distributions of available cash each quarter in an amount
equal to $0.30 per common unit (the Minimum Quarterly Distribution), plus any arrearages in the
payment of the Minimum Quarterly Distribution on the common units from prior quarters, before any
distributions of available cash may be made on the subordinated units. Furthermore, no arrearages
will be paid on the subordinated units. The practical effect of the subordinated units is to
increase the likelihood that during the subordination period there will be available cash to be
distributed on the common units. The subordination period will end, and the subordinated units will
convert to common units, on a one-for-one basis, when certain distribution requirements, as defined
in the partnership agreement, have been met. The earliest date at which the subordination period
may end is June 30, 2008.
Incentive
Distribution Rights. The general partner holds incentive distribution rights in accordance with the partnership
agreement as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marginal Percentage |
|
|
Total Quarterly Distribution |
|
Interest in Distributions |
|
|
|
|
Common and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
|
|
Target Amount |
|
Unitholders |
|
General Partner |
Minimum Quarterly
Distribution |
|
$0.30 |
|
98% |
|
2% |
First Target Distribution |
|
up to $0.345 |
|
98% |
|
2% |
Second Target Distribution |
|
above $0.345 up to $0.375 |
|
85% |
|
15% |
Third Target Distribution |
|
above $0.375 up to $0.45 |
|
75% |
|
25% |
Thereafter |
|
above $0.45 |
|
50% |
|
50% |
To the extent
these incentive distributions are made to the general partner, there will be more net income proportionately
allocated to the general partner than to holders of common and subordinated units.
7. Marketable Securities
In
the third quarter of 2007, the Company invested a portion of the
proceeds from its IPO in highly liquid financial instruments,
such as variable rate debt securities that frequently have stated
maturities of 20 years or more. As of September 30, 2007, $184.3
million of investment-grade securities were pledged as collateral
against the Companys term loan. The Company has classified these
securities as available-for-sale under SFAS No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities, as management does not intend to hold them to
maturity. The carrying value of these instruments approximates fair value. Purchases and
sales of available-for-sale securities are presented on a gross basis
within Cash Flows from Investing Activities in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
8. Goodwill
The Company has completed its annual goodwill impairment test as of August 31, 2007 and no
impairments were identified. The Company primarily uses a discounted cash flow analysis to
determine fair value for each reporting unit. Key assumptions in the determination of fair value
include the use of an appropriate discount rate and estimated future cash flows. In estimating
cash flows, the Company incorporates expected long-term growth rates, regulatory stability and the
ability to renew contracts, as well as other factors that affect its revenue, expense and capital
expenditure projections.
9. Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates and Related Transactions
The Companys investments in unconsolidated affiliates consist of a 50% interest in Market Hub
and a 24.5% interest in Gulfstream. Periodically, the Company receives distributions from these
unconsolidated affiliates. The Company received distributions from Gulfstream of $9.1 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and $17.9 million during the same period in 2006 which are
reflected in Distributions Received From Equity Investments within Cash Flows from Operating
Activities on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. No distributions from Market
Hub were received in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 or 2006.
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Gulfstream |
|
$ |
203.0 |
|
|
$ |
186.4 |
|
Market Hub |
|
|
287.8 |
|
|
|
256.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
490.8 |
|
|
$ |
442.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Gulfstream |
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
18.4 |
|
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
Market Hub |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
18.5 |
|
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
$ |
41.5 |
|
|
$ |
28.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summarized Financial Information of Unconsolidated Affiliates
(Presented at the 100% Ownership Level)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Gulfstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
56.9 |
|
|
$ |
51.6 |
|
|
$ |
141.1 |
|
|
$ |
139.0 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
51.6 |
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
109.2 |
|
|
|
86.3 |
|
Net income |
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
74.8 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
Hub |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
24.8 |
|
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
|
$ |
69.1 |
|
|
$ |
57.4 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
Net income |
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
10. Debt and Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
Outstanding as of September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving |
|
|
Credit Facility Summary |
|
Expiration
Date |
|
Capacity |
|
Term Loan |
|
Loan |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
Spectra Energy Partners, LP
|
|
May 2012
|
|
$ |
500.0 |
|
|
$ |
182.0 |
(a) |
|
$ |
127.0 |
|
|
$ |
309.0 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Contains a covenant requiring the borrower to collateralize the term loan with qualifying investment
grade securities in an amount equal to or greater than the
outstanding principal amount of the loan. The terms of the credit facility allow for liquidation of collateral to fund capital expenditures
or certain acquisitions provided that an equal amount of term loan is converted to a revolving
loan. |
Effective as of July 2, 2007, the Company entered into a five-year $500.0 million credit
agreement that includes both term and revolving borrowing capacity, of which the Company borrowed
$194.0 million of term borrowings and $125.0 million of revolving borrowings upon the closing of
the IPO.
The Companys obligations under the revolving portion of its credit facility are unsecured and
the term borrowings are secured by qualifying investment grade securities in an amount equal to or
greater than the outstanding principal amount of the loan. As of September 30, 2007, $184.3 million
of investment grade securities were pledged as collateral against the aforementioned term debt. The
revolving credit facility bears interest based on the London InterBank Offering Rate (LIBOR). The
credit facility prohibits the Company from making distributions of available cash to unitholders if
any default or event of default, as defined, exists. In addition, the credit facility contains
covenants, among others, limiting the Companys ability to make other restricted distributions or
dividends on account of the purchase, redemption, retirement, acquisition, cancellation or
termination of partnership interests, and is also subject to certain financial covenants. As of
September 30, 2007, the Company believes it was in compliance with those covenants.
15
East Tennessee Long-term Debt. Long-term debt of East Tennessee consists of its 5.71% notes
payable totaling $150.0 million as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. This debt is due in
one installment in 2012. East Tennessees debt agreement contains financial covenants which limit
the amount of debt that can be outstanding as a percentage of total capital. Failure to maintain
the covenants could require East Tennessee to immediately pay down the outstanding balance. The
covenant calculations are performed by East Tennessee on a quarterly basis to establish that they
are in compliance with the covenants. As of September 30, 2007, East Tennessee believes it was in
compliance with those covenants. In addition, the debt agreement allows for acceleration of
payments or termination of the agreements due to nonpayment, or to the acceleration of other
significant indebtedness of the borrower or some of its subsidiaries, if any. The debt agreement
does not contain material adverse change clauses.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental. The Company is subject to federal, state and local regulations regarding air
and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal and other environmental matters. Management
believes there are no matters outstanding that will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Litigation and Legal Proceedings. The Company is involved in legal, tax and regulatory
proceedings in various forums, including matters regarding contracts, performance and other
matters, arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve substantial monetary
amounts. Management believes that the final disposition of these proceedings will not have a
material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated results of operations, financial position or
cash flows.
12. Equity-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for equity-based awards under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment, which establishes accounting for equity-based awards exchanged for employee
and certain non-employee services. Accordingly, for employee awards, equity-based compensation cost
is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense
over the requisite service period.
The Company awarded 120,250 common phantom units at a price of $28.30 (fair value of
approximately $3.4 million) to certain employees of Spectra Energy during the three months ended
September 30, 2007. These units were granted under the Spectra Energy Partners, LP Long Term
Incentive Plan and will vest over three years.
Total compensation expense during the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $0.2 million.
The Company expects to recognize approximately $3 million of future compensation cost related to
the common phantom units over a weighted-average period of three years.
13. New Accounting Pronouncements
The following new accounting pronouncements were adopted by the Company during the periods
presented subsequent to September 30, 2006:
FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxesan Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109. In July 2006, the FASB
issued FIN 48, which provides guidance on accounting for income tax positions. FIN 48 prescribes a
minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet. Tax positions are defined very
broadly and include not only tax deductions and credits but also decisions not to file in a
particular jurisdiction, as well as the taxability of transactions. The Company implemented FIN 48
on January 1, 2007. The implementation had no material impact on the consolidated financial
statements. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company reflects interest expense
related to taxes as Interest Expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition,
subsequent accounting for FIN 48 (after January 1, 2007) will involve an evaluation to determine if
any changes have occurred that would impact any existing uncertain tax
16
positions as well as determining whether any new tax positions are uncertain. Any impacts
resulting from the evaluation of existing uncertain tax positions or from the recognition of new
uncertain tax positions would impact Income Tax Expense and Interest Expense.
FASB Staff Position (FSP) FIN 48-1 Definition of Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48.
In May 2007, the FASB issued
FSP FIN 48-1 to provide guidance on how an enterprise should determine
whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously
unrecognized tax benefits. The guidance in this FSP was effective for the Company as of January 1,
2007. The adoption of FSP FIN 48-1 did not have a material impact on consolidated results of
operations, financial position or cash flows.
The following new accounting pronouncements have been issued, but have not yet been adopted by
the Company as of September 30, 2007:
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value
measurements. However, in some cases, the application of SFAS No. 157 may change the Companys
current practice for measuring and disclosing fair values under other accounting pronouncements
that require or permit fair value measurements. For the Company, SFAS No. 157 is effective as of
January 1, 2008 and will be applied prospectively. The adoption of SFAS 157 is not expected to
materially affect consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, which permits entities to choose to measure certain
financial instruments at fair value. For the Company, SFAS No. 159 is effective as of January 1,
2008 and will have no impact on amounts presented for periods prior to the effective date. The
Company cannot currently estimate the impact that SFAS No. 159 will have on its consolidated
results of operations, financial position or cash flows and has not yet determined whether it will
choose to measure items subject to SFAS No. 159 at fair value.
14. Subsequent Event
On October 24, 2007, the Company announced that the board of directors of its general partner
declared a third quarter cash distribution to the Companys unitholders of $0.30 per unit for the
period beginning with the closing of its IPO on July 2, 2007 through September 30, 2007. The cash
distribution is payable on November 14, 2007 to unitholders of record at the close of business on
November 2, 2007.
17
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
INTRODUCTION
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should
be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Executive Overview
On July 2, 2007, the Company completed its IPO. The Company issued 11.5 million common units
to the public, representing 17% of its outstanding equity. Spectra Energy retained an 83% equity
interest in the Company, including its common units, subordinated units and a 2% general partner
interest. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
For the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Company reported net income of $134.3
million as compared to net income of $13.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company reported net income of $175.1 million
compared to net income of $44.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increase
in net income for both periods was primarily due to growth at both East Tennessee and Market Hub
from additional pipeline and storage facilities placed in service during the second half of 2006 in
addition to the $110.5 million deferred federal income tax liabilities that were eliminated just prior to the IPO.
The consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial
position for periods prior to the Companys IPO are not
necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations, cash
flows and financial position that might have resulted if the Company had been operated separately during
those periods.
On October 24, 2007, the Company announced that the board of directors of its general partner
declared a third quarter cash distribution to the Companys unitholders of $0.30 per unit, payable
on November 14, 2007 to unitholders of record at the close of business on November 2, 2007.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
|
$ |
18.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
73.9 |
|
|
$ |
59.2 |
|
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
Operating, maintenance and other |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
Other income and expenses, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
53.7 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(110.4 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(111.9 |
) |
|
|
(99.8 |
) |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
(108.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
134.3 |
|
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
|
$ |
120.7 |
|
|
$ |
175.1 |
|
|
$ |
44.9 |
|
|
$ |
130.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA (a,b) |
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
58.9 |
|
|
$ |
44.3 |
|
|
$ |
14.6 |
|
Cash Available for Distribution (b,c) |
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
69.7 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income plus interest expense, income
taxes, and depreciation and amortization, less equity in earnings of
Gulfstream and Market Hub, interest income, and other income and
expenses, net, which primarily includes non-cash allowance for funds
used during construction (AFUDC). |
|
(b) |
|
For a reconciliation of this measure to its most directly comparable
financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP,
see Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures. |
|
(c) |
|
Cash Available for Distribution is defined as Adjusted EBITDA plus
Cash Available for Distribution from Gulfstream and Market Hub, less
net cash paid for interest expense (income), net and maintenance
capital expenditures. Cash Available for Distribution does not reflect
changes in working capital balances. |
18
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 as Compared to September 30, 2006
Operating Revenues. The $5.2 million increase was primarily due to net increases from new firm
transportation contracts from East Tennessees Jewell Ridge expansion project that
was placed into service during the fourth quarter of 2006 and additional firm transportation
contracts on the Patriot pipeline lateral.
Operating
Maintenance and Other. The $0.5 million decrease was primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
a $1.5 million increase due to lower capitalization of certain corporate overhead
expenses as a result of lower capital spending related to the Jewell Ridge expansion project
in 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006, and |
|
|
|
|
a $1.0 million increase in general and administrative costs associated with managing the
Company post-IPO, partially offset by |
|
|
|
|
a $1.5 million net decrease from higher net pipeline fuel recoveries by East Tennessee in
the 2007 period compared to the 2006 period, and |
|
|
|
|
a $1.0 million decrease in ad valorem taxes primarily as a result of favorable
valuations. |
Depreciation and Amortization. The $2.8 million increase is primarily due to the Jewell Ridge
expansion project placed in service in 2006.
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates. The $7.8 million increase consisted of a $4.9
million increase in equity earnings from Gulfstream and a $2.9 million increase in equity earnings
from Market Hub. The following discussion explains the factors affecting the equity earnings of
Gulfstream and Market Hub, each representing 100% of the earnings drivers of those entities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Gulfstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
56.9 |
|
|
$ |
51.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
Operating, maintenance and other |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Other income
and expenses, net |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
40.2 |
|
|
$ |
20.4 |
|
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys 24.5% share |
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulfstream Owned 24.5%
Gulfstreams net income increased by $19.8 million to $40.2 million for the three-month period
in 2007 compared to $20.4 million for the same period in 2006. The increase was primarily due
to:
|
|
|
a $5.3 million increase in revenues driven by a higher demand for interruptible
services as a result of warmer weather compared to the 2006 third quarter, and |
|
|
|
|
a $14.0 million decrease in expenses primarily resulting from $7.0 million of
capitalization of previously expensed project development costs of Phase IV in the third
quarter of 2007 as compared to $4.0 million of project development costs expensed in the
third quarter of 2006, and $2.5 million in decreased ad valorem taxes primarily due to
favorable 2007 tax rates. |
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Market Hub |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
24.8 |
|
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
Operating, maintenance and other |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Other income and expenses, net |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys 50% share |
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Hub Owned 50%
Market Hubs net income
increased by $5.9 million to $17.1 million for the three-month period
in 2007 compared to $11.2 million for the same period in 2006. The increase was primarily due
to:
|
|
|
a $3.8 million increase in revenues driven by an increase in short-term interruptible
storage revenues due to higher demand, |
|
|
|
|
a $1.6 million decrease in operating expenses primarily due to lower corporate costs, and |
|
|
|
|
a $0.9 million increase in interest income on higher cash balances, partially offset by |
|
|
|
|
a $0.5 million increase in depreciation primarily due to an Egan expansion project
placed in service in 2006. |
Interest Income. The $2.8 million increase is due to interest earned on marketable securities
purchased with a portion of the IPO proceeds. These securities are pledged as collateral to secure
the term loan portion of the Companys credit facility entered into on July 2, 2007.
Interest Expense. The $4.4 million increase is due to the term and revolver borrowings entered
into on July 2, 2007.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). The income tax benefit for the three months ended September 30, 2007
was $110.4 million compared to income tax expense of $1.5 million in the same period in 2006. In
the third quarter of 2007, the Company recorded a one-time benefit of $110.5 million from the
reversal of deferred federal income tax liabilities. Effective July 2, 2007, as a result of the Companys master
limited partnership structure, the Company is no longer subject to federal income taxes.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 as Compared to September 30, 2006
Operating Revenues. The $14.7 million increase was primarily due to increases from new firm
transportation contracts from the Jewell Ridge expansion project that
was placed
into service during the fourth quarter of 2006 and additional firm transportation contracts on the
Patriot lateral pipeline.
Operating, Maintenance and Other. The
$0.1 million increase was primarily due to:
|
|
|
a $5.7 million increase due to the capitalization of previously expensed project
development costs for Jewell Ridge in the second quarter of 2006, |
|
|
|
|
a $2.6 million increase due to lower capitalization of certain corporate overhead
expenses as a result of lower capital spending comparing 2007 to 2006, and |
|
|
|
|
a $1.9 million increase in pipeline integrity costs in the 2007 period, partially offset
by |
|
|
|
|
a $10.2 million decrease from higher net pipeline fuel recoveries by East Tennessee in
the 2007 period compared to the 2006 period. |
20
Depreciation and
Amortization. The $3.3 million increase is primarily due to the Jewell Ridge
expansion project placed in service in 2006.
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates. The $12.8 million increase consisted of a $6.5
million increase in earnings from Market Hub and a $6.3 million increase in earnings from
Gulfstream. The following discussion explains the factors affecting the equity earnings of
Gulfstream and Market Hub, each representing 100% of the earnings drivers of those entities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Gulfstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
141.1 |
|
|
$ |
139.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
Operating, maintenance and other |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Gain (loss) on sales of other assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Other income and expenses, net |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
74.8 |
|
|
$ |
49.5 |
|
|
$ |
25.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys 24.5% share |
|
$ |
18.4 |
|
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulfstream Owned 24.5%
Gulfstreams net income increased $25.3 million to $74.8 million for the nine month period in
2007 compared to $49.5 million for the same period in 2006. The increase was primarily due to:
|
|
|
a $2.1 million increase in revenues related to short-term firm transportation, |
|
|
|
|
a $20.8 million decrease in expenses primarily resulting from $2.8 million of
net capitalization of previously expensed project development costs of Phase IV in 2007
compared to $8.1 million in project development costs expensed in 2006, and a $10.5
million decrease in ad valorem taxes primarily as a result of favorable valuations, and |
|
|
|
|
a $2.0 million increase in other income and expenses, net primarily due to a first
quarter 2006 charge related to a sales and use tax matter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Market Hub |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
69.1 |
|
|
$ |
57.4 |
|
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
Operating, maintenance and other |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Other income and expenses, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
46.2 |
|
|
$ |
33.2 |
|
|
$ |
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys 50% share |
|
$ |
23.1 |
|
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Market Hub Owned 50%
Market Hubs net income increased $13.0 million to $46.2 million for the nine-month period in
2007 compared to $33.2 million for the same period in 2006. The increase was primarily due to:
|
|
|
an $11.7 million increase in revenues primarily due to a $7.1 million increase in the
demand for short-term interruptible storage services and a $4.4 million increase related
to new firm storage revenues associated with the additional Egan storage capacity that
was placed in service during the third quarter 2006, and |
|
|
|
|
a $2.5 million decrease in operating expenses, primarily driven by a $2.2 million
increase in fuel recovery and a $1.0 million reduction in property and other taxes due
to the favorable resolution of ad valorem tax matters in 2007, partially offset by a
$0.5 million increase related to the expansion project placed into service in the fourth
quarter of 2006, partially offset by |
|
|
|
|
a $0.9 million increase in depreciation primarily due to an Egan expansion project
placed in service in 2006. |
Interest Income. The $2.8 million increase is due to interest earned on marketable securities
purchased with a portion of the IPO proceeds.
Interest Expense. The $4.6 million increase is due mainly to the term and revolver borrowings
entered into on July 2, 2007.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). The
Companys income tax benefit for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was $99.8 million compared to income tax expense of $8.8 million in the same
period in 2006. In the third quarter of 2007, the Company recorded a one-time benefit of $110.5
million from the reversal of deferred federal income tax liabilities. This tax benefit is partially offset by
higher earnings of East Tennessee in the 2007 period. Effective July 2, 2007, as a result of the
Companys master limited partnership structure, the Company is no longer subject to federal income
taxes.
Cash Available for Distribution
Cash Available for Distribution and Adjusted EBITDA are used as supplemental financial
measures by management and external users of the Companys financial statements, including
investors. Cash Available for Distribution is defined as Adjusted EBITDA plus Cash Available for
Distribution from Gulfstream and Market Hub, less net cash paid for interest expense (income), net
and maintenance capital expenditures. Cash Available for Distribution does not reflect changes in
working capital balances. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income plus interest expense, income
taxes, and depreciation and amortization, less equity in earnings of Gulfstream and Market Hub,
interest income, and other income and expenses, net, which primarily includes the non-cash
allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC).
For Gulfstream and Market Hub, Cash Available for Distribution is defined as the Companys
share of Adjusted EBITDA less net cash paid for interest expense and maintenance capital
expenditures. Cash Available for Distribution does not reflect changes in working capital balances.
Cash Available for Distribution should not be viewed as indicative of the actual amount of
cash that the Company has available for distributions or that the Company plans to distribute for a
given period.
Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Available for Distribution should not be considered alternatives to
net income, operating income, cash from operations or any other measure of financial performance or
liquidity presented in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as a substitute for
analysis of the Companys results as reported under GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Available for
Distribution exclude some, but not all, items that affect net income and operating income and these
measures may vary among other companies. Therefore, Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Available for
Distribution as presented may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
22
Significant drivers of variances in Cash Available for Distribution and Adjusted EBITDA
between the periods presented are substantially the same as those previously discussed under
Results of Operations. Other drivers include the timing of certain cash outflows, such as capital
expenditures for maintenance and the scheduled payments of interest.
Calculation and Reconciliation of
Non-GAAP Cash Available for Distribution and Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
134.3 |
|
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
|
$ |
175.1 |
|
|
$ |
44.9 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Income tax
expense (benefit) |
|
|
(110.4 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(99.8 |
) |
|
|
8.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of Gulfstream |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
Equity in earnings of Market Hub |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
58.9 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Available for Distribution from Gulfstream |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
Cash Available for Distribution from Market Hub |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest expense, net |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Maintenance capital expenditures |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Available for Distribution |
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
|
$ |
24.1 |
|
|
$ |
97.1 |
|
|
$ |
69.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Reconciliation
of Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Available for
Distribution to GAAP Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
$ |
54.0 |
|
|
$ |
59.7 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Income tax expense current |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
Distributions received from Gulfstream |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
Changes in operating working capital and other |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
58.9 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Available for Distribution from Gulfstream |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
Cash Available for Distribution from Market Hub |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest expense, net |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Maintenance capital expenditures |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Available for Distribution |
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
|
$ |
24.1 |
|
|
$ |
97.1 |
|
|
$ |
69.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Gulfstream Calculation and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Cash Available for Distribution and
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Gulfstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
40.2 |
|
|
$ |
20.4 |
|
|
$ |
74.8 |
|
|
$ |
49.5 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses), net |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA 100% |
|
|
59.1 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
131.9 |
|
|
|
109.1 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest expense, net |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
Maintenance capital expenditures |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Available for Distribution 100% |
|
$ |
57.3 |
|
|
$ |
38.8 |
|
|
$ |
105.7 |
|
|
$ |
81.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA 24.5% |
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
|
$ |
26.7 |
|
Cash Available for Distribution 24.5% |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
Market Hub Calculation and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Cash Available for Distribution and
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Market Hub |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17.1 |
|
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
$ |
46.2 |
|
|
$ |
33.2 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses), net |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA 100% |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
40.5 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Available for Distribution 100% |
|
$ |
19.3 |
|
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
$ |
51.8 |
|
|
$ |
35.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA 50% |
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
27.4 |
|
|
$ |
20.3 |
|
Cash Available for Distribution 50% |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
25
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Companys ability to finance operations, fund capital expenditures and acquisitions, meet
indebtedness obligations and refinance indebtedness will depend on the Companys ability to
generate cash in the future. Historically, the Companys sources of liquidity included cash
generated from operations, cash received from Gulfstream, external debt and funding from Spectra
Energy. Market Hub was formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of Spectra Energy and did not make
distributions to Spectra Energy, but it will now be required to make distributions of its available
cash to its partners.
The Companys cash receipts were historically deposited in Spectra Energys bank accounts and
cash disbursements were made from those accounts. Consequently, the Companys historical financial
statements reflect no cash balances. Cash transactions processed on the Companys behalf by Spectra
Energy were reflected in parent net investment as intercompany advances between the Company and
Spectra Energy. The Company now maintains bank accounts but will continue to rely on Spectra Energy
personnel to manage cash and investments through the Companys management arrangements with Spectra
Energy.
The Companys future sources of liquidity include cash generated from operations, cash
distributions received from Gulfstream and Market Hub, borrowings
under the new $500 million credit
facility, cash realized from the liquidation of securities that are currently pledged under the new
credit facility, issuances of additional partnership units and debt offerings.
Operating Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $5.7 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. This decrease was driven primarily by
lower distributions received from Gulfstream as a result of its Phase IV expansion cash
requirements in periods prior to the Companys IPO.
Net working capital
was $191.0 million as of September 30, 2007 (which includes $184.3 million
of short-term investments pledged as collateral) as compared to negative $4.8 million as of
December 31, 2006. The Company will rely upon cash flows from operations and financing transactions
to fund its liquidity and capital requirements for the next 12 months.
Investing Cash Flows
Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $218.2 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 compared to $69.7 million during the same period in 2006. This $148.5 million
increase was driven primarily by:
|
|
net purchases of investment-grade securities totaling $184.3 million that are held as
collateral for the term portion of the $500.0 million credit facility and |
|
|
|
a $14.8 million increase in investment expenditures from infusions of capital to Gulfstream
and Market Hub in 2007, partially offset by |
|
|
|
a $50.8 million reduction in expansion capital expenditures in the 2007 period, primarily
the result of the completion of the Jewell Ridge expansion project in the fourth quarter of
2006. |
Capital
and investment expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 totaled
$33.9 million and included $25.5 million for expansion projects and $8.4 million for maintenance
projects. Since the completion of the Companys IPO in July 2007, through September 30, 2007,
capital and investment expenditures totaled $20.0 million and included $17.8 million
for expansion projects and $2.2 million for maintenance projects.
The Company projects total 2007 capital and investment expenditures of approximately
$42.1 million, of which $33.5 million is expected to be invested in expansion projects and $8.6
million for maintenance and other projects. Given the Companys objective of growth through
acquisitions and expansions of existing assets, the Company anticipates continuing to invest
significant amounts of capital to grow and acquire assets. Expansion capital expenditures may vary
significantly based on investment opportunities.
26
Financing Cash Flows
Prior to the completion of the IPO, all of the Companys excess cash flow was distributed as
dividends and net transfers to Spectra Energy. As a result, the changes in cash provided by
operating activities and cash used in investing activities were offset by cash flows of financing
activities. Cash flows provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 totaled $181.5 million compared to $10.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
This $171.5 million increase was driven primarily by:
|
|
$309.0 million in issuances of long-term debt, net of redemptions in 2007, and |
|
|
|
$230.0 million of net cash received upon issuance of common units to the public in the IPO,
partially offset by |
|
|
|
a cash distribution of $345.0 million to Spectra Energy on July 2, 2007 compared to
transfers from Spectra Energy of $10.0 million in 2006, and |
|
|
|
members dividends of $12.5 million in 2007. |
Credit Facility. Effective as of July 2, 2007, the Company, as guarantor, and Spectra Energy
Partners OLP, LP, a subsidiary of Spectra Energy, entered into a five-year $500 million credit
agreement that includes both term and revolving borrowing capacity, of which the Company borrowed
$194.0 million of term borrowings and $125.0 million of revolving borrowings upon the closing of
the IPO. See Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Cash Distributions. On October 24, 2007, the Company announced that the board of directors of
its general partner declared a third quarter cash distribution to the Companys unitholders of
$0.30 per unit for the period beginning with the closing of its IPO on July 2, 2007 through
September 30, 2007. The cash distribution is payable on November 14, 2007 to unitholders of record
at the close of business on November 2, 2007.
OTHER ISSUES
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures about Market Risk.
The Companys exposure to market risk is described in Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk in its Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, filed with
the SEC on June 22, 2007. Management believes the exposure to market risk has not changed
materially at September 30, 2007.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized, and
reported, within the time periods specified by the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or
submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
27
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure
controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange
Act) as of September 30, 2007, and, based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated changes in internal control over
financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange
Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 and found no change that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial
reporting.
As discussed in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and in the Liquidity
and Capital Resources section, certain management arrangements exist between the Company and
Spectra Energy under which Spectra Energy provides administrative services to the Company,
including services related to internal controls over financial reporting. In connection with the
spin-off of Spectra Energy from Duke Energy, Spectra Energy created new corporate functions,
including those that affect internal control over financial reporting. During 2007, as part of its
analysis of internal control over financial reporting, Spectra Energy will maintain internal
controls over corporate and other functions created as a result of the spin-off, including those
for which Spectra Energy provides services to the Company, and will, to the extent necessary,
evaluate Duke Energy processes that impact Spectra Energys internal control over financial
reporting.
28
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, careful consideration should be
given to the factors discussed in Risk Factors in the Companys Registration Statement on Form
S-1, as amended, filed with the SEC on June 22, 2007, which could materially affect the Companys
financial condition or future results. There were no changes to those risk factors at September 30,
2007.
Item 4. Submission of
Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 6.
Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 30,
2007, by and among Spectra Energy Partners OLP, LP, as the
Borrower, Spectra Energy Partners, LP, as Parent Guarantor and
Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and
the other lenders party thereto (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1
to Spectra Energy Partners, LPs Form 8-K dated October 11, 2007). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
By: Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP,
its general partner
By: Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC,
its general partner
|
|
Date: November 14, 2007 |
/s/ C. Gregory Harper
|
|
|
C. Gregory Harper |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 14, 2007 |
/s/ Lon C. Mitchell, Jr.
|
|
|
Lon C. Mitchell, Jr. |
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC |
|
|
30