e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-33556
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
41-2232463 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
5400 Westheimer Court
Houston, Texas 77056
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
713-627-5400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
There were 48,852,175 Common Units, 21,638,730 Subordinated Units and 1,438,291 General Partner
Units outstanding as of July 31, 2008.
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
June 30, 2008
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
2
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This document includes forward-looking statements that are based on managements beliefs and
assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by terms and phrases such as
anticipate, believe, intend, estimate, expect, continue, should, could, may,
plan, project, predict, will, potential, forecast, and similar expressions.
Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to be
materially different from the results predicted. Factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those indicated in any forward-looking statement include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
state and federal legislative and regulatory initiatives that affect cost and investment
recovery, have an effect on rate structure, and affect the speed at and degree to which
competition enters the natural gas industries; |
|
|
|
|
outcomes of litigation and regulatory investigations, proceedings or inquiries; |
|
|
|
|
weather and other natural phenomena, including the economic, operational and other
effects of hurricanes and storms; |
|
|
|
|
the timing and extent of changes in interest rates; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions, including any potential effects arising from terrorist
attacks and any consequential hostilities or other hostilities; |
|
|
|
|
changes in environmental, safety and other laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
|
results of financing efforts, including the ability to obtain financing on favorable
terms, which can be affected by various factors, including credit ratings and general
economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
increases in the cost of goods and services required to complete capital projects; |
|
|
|
|
growth in opportunities, including the timing and success of efforts to develop domestic
pipeline, storage, and other infrastructure projects and the effects of competition; |
|
|
|
|
the performance of natural gas transmission and storage facilities; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by accounting
standard-setting bodies; |
|
|
|
|
conditions of the capital markets during the periods covered by the forward-looking
statements; and |
|
|
|
|
the ability to successfully complete merger, acquisition or divestiture plans; regulatory
or other limitations imposed as a result of a merger, acquisition or divestiture; and the
success of the business following a merger, acquisition or divestiture. |
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the
forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different
time than Spectra Energy Partners, LP has described. Spectra Energy Partners, LP undertakes no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In millions, except per-unit amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation of natural gas |
|
$ |
25.8 |
|
|
$ |
24.2 |
|
|
$ |
53.0 |
|
|
$ |
49.7 |
|
Storage of natural gas and other |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
|
|
61.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating, maintenance and other |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
Other income and expenses, net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and expenses |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
27.5 |
|
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
$ |
51.6 |
|
|
$ |
45.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of Limited Partners Interest in Net Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
27.5 |
|
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
$ |
51.6 |
|
|
$ |
45.0 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to predecessor operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
General partners interest in net income |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
26.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net income per limited partner unit |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Weighted average limited partners units outstanding basic and diluted |
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
30.4 |
|
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments and Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
525.8 |
|
|
|
495.1 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
118.3 |
|
|
|
118.3 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
94.9 |
|
|
|
154.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments and other assets |
|
|
739.0 |
|
|
|
768.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
951.2 |
|
|
|
930.0 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
146.2 |
|
|
|
133.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
805.0 |
|
|
|
796.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Assets and Deferred Debits |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,604.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,611.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
Taxes accrued |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Interest accrued |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Natural gas imbalance payables |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Note payable affiliates |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
78.8 |
|
|
|
73.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
390.0 |
|
|
|
400.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred credits and other liabilities |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.4 |
|
Common units
(48.9 million and 44.6 million units outstanding
at June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
794.4 |
|
|
|
699.3 |
|
Subordinated
units (21.6 million units outstanding) |
|
|
304.7 |
|
|
|
303.5 |
|
General
partner units (1.4 million units outstanding) |
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital |
|
|
1,124.3 |
|
|
|
1,123.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Partners Capital |
|
$ |
1,604.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,611.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
6
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
51.6 |
|
|
$ |
45.0 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(27.6 |
) |
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
74.0 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
Investment expenditures |
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Acquisition of Saltville and P-25 pipeline |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(700.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
760.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
702.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt |
|
|
(712.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions to partners |
|
|
(45.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
Transfers to parent, net |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(56.2 |
) |
|
|
(32.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
30.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
7
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS CAPITAL
(Unaudited)
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Capital |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor |
|
|
Limited Partners |
|
|
General |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
Partner |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
98.4 |
|
|
$ |
699.3 |
|
|
$ |
303.5 |
|
|
$ |
19.0 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,123.7 |
|
Net income |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.6 |
|
Net change in parent advances |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Acquisition of Saltville and
P-25 pipeline |
|
|
(99.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99.2 |
) |
Excess purchase price over net
acquired assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
Issuance of units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102.3 |
|
Attributed deferred tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Unrealized
mark-to-market net gain on hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Reclassification of cash flow
hedges into earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Distributions to partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
794.4 |
|
|
$ |
304.7 |
|
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,124.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
1,093.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,097.1 |
|
Net income attributable to
predecessor operations |
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
Reclassification of cash flow
hedges into earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Net change in parent advances |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
Dividends to parent |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,105.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,109.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
8
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. General
Nature of Operations. Spectra Energy Partners, LP, through its subsidiaries and equity
affiliates (collectively, Spectra Energy Partners) is engaged in the transportation of natural gas
through interstate pipeline systems that serve the southeastern United States, and the storage of
natural gas in underground facilities that are located in southeast Texas, south central Louisiana
and southwest Virginia. Spectra Energy Partners, LP is a Delaware master limited partnership formed
on March 19, 2007.
Initial Public Offering. On July 2, 2007, immediately prior to the closing of Spectra Energy
Partners initial public offering (IPO), Spectra Energy Corp (Spectra Energy) contributed to
Spectra Energy Partners, LP 100% of the ownership of East Tennessee Natural Gas LLC (East
Tennessee) less certain working capital balances retained as per the partnership agreements, 50% of
the ownership of Market Hub Partners Holding (Market Hub) and a 24.5% interest in Gulfstream
Natural Gas System, L.L.C. (Gulfstream).
On July 2, 2007, Spectra Energy Partners completed its IPO. Spectra Energy Partners issued
11.5 million common units to the public, representing 17% of its outstanding equity. Spectra Energy
retained an 83% equity interest in Spectra Energy Partners, including common units, subordinated
units and a 2% general partner interest. Spectra Energy also holds incentive distribution rights.
Acquisitions. On April 4, 2008, Spectra Energy Partners completed the acquisition of the
equity interests of Saltville Gas Storage Company L.L.C. (Saltville) and the P-25 pipeline from
Spectra Energy (collectively, hereafter referred to as the Saltville acquisition) at a purchase
price of $107.0 million, which included the issuance of 4,207,641 common units and 85,870 general
partner units, and a cash payment of $4.7 million to Spectra
Energy.
The Saltville acquisition represented a transfer of entities under common control.
Accordingly, the condensed consolidated financial statements and related information presented
herein have been recast to include the historical results of Saltville and the P-25 pipeline for
all periods presented. See Note 2 for further discussion.
Basis of Presentation. For periods prior to the closing of the IPO, the combined financial
statements were prepared from the separate records maintained by Spectra Energy for the entities
that were originally contributed to Spectra Energy Partners and for the operations included in the
Saltville acquisition, and are based on Spectra Energys historical ownership percentages of those
operations. The combined financial results of these entities are treated as the historical results
of Spectra Energy Partners for financial statement reporting purposes. Both the combined financial
statements of East Tennessee, Saltville, Market Hub and Gulfstream, as well as the consolidated
financial statements of Spectra Energy Partners for the periods post-IPO, are hereafter referred to
as the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The historical data for periods prior to the
closing of the IPO and for periods prior to the Saltville acquisition may not necessarily be
indicative of the actual results of operations had those entities been operated separately during
those periods. Because a direct ownership relationship did not exist among the entities comprising
Spectra Energy Partners prior to July 2, 2007 and prior to the Saltville acquisition on April 4,
2008, the net investment in Spectra Energy Partners is shown as Predecessor Equity in the
applicable Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Spectra Energy Partners generally accounts for investments in 20% to 50%-owned affiliates, and
investments in less than 20%-owned affiliates where it has the ability to exercise significant
influence, under the equity method. Accordingly, the consolidated historical financial statements
for Spectra Energy Partners reflect the consolidation of East Tennessee, operations associated with
the Saltville acquisition, and the investments in Market Hub and Gulfstream using the equity method
of accounting. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements included in Spectra Energy Partners Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007 and reflect all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of
management, necessary to fairly present Spectra Energy Partners results of operations and
financial position. Amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are not
necessarily indicative of amounts expected for the respective annual periods.
Use of Estimates. To conform with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the
United States, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements. Although these estimates are based on managements best available knowledge at the
time, actual results could differ.
9
2. Acquisitions
On April 4, 2008, Spectra Energy Partners completed the Saltville acquisition from Spectra
Energy at a purchase price of $107.0 million, which included the issuance of 4,207,641 common units
and 85,870 general partner units, and a cash payment of $4.7 million to Spectra Energy. Saltville
assets include three separate natural gas storage facilities adjacent to the East Tennessee system
in southwest Virginia with approximately 5.5 billion cubic feet of working capacity. The P-25
pipeline, now part of the operations of East Tennessee, is a 72-mile, eight-inch natural gas
pipeline with a capacity of 40 million cubic feet per day that runs parallel to the East Tennessee
system in Virginia. The Saltville storage assets and the P-25 pipeline are strategically integrated
with Spectra Energy Partners East Tennessee system. The completion of the Saltville acquisition
allows for a streamlined regulatory structure under Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
jurisdiction, an enhanced operational flexibility that will benefit both East Tennessee and
Saltville customers and a broader array of organic expansion opportunities for Spectra Energy
Partners pipeline and storage assets.
Spectra Energys ownership of Spectra Energy Partners increased from 83% to 84% as a result of
receipt of the new common and general partner units. The $7.8 million excess purchase price over
the book value of net assets acquired was recorded as a reduction to Partners Capital, and the
$102.3 million of common and general partner units issued were recorded as increases to Partners
Capital.
As discussed in Note 1, the Saltville acquisition represented a transfer of entities under
common control, which requires that the assets and liabilities acquired be recorded at historical
book value and that Spectra Energy Partners financial statements be presented on a basis similar
to the pooling method of accounting, whereby all historical periods are retroactively adjusted to
furnish comparative financial information as if the transaction had occurred immediately prior to
the earliest period presented.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The historical Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 have been recast
to retroactively reflect the Saltville acquisition, as presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Saltville |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Recast |
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Saltville |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Recast |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transportation of natural gas |
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24.2 |
|
|
$ |
48.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
49.7 |
|
Storage of natural gas and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
61.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating, maintenance and other |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
11.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Property and other taxes |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
Other income and expenses, net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and expenses |
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Before Income Taxes |
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
51.4 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
$ |
40.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
45.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The historical Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as
of December 31, 2007 has been recast to retroactively reflect the Saltville acquisition, as
presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Saltville |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Recast |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
16.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments and Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
495.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495.1 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
118.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118.3 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
154.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments and other assets |
|
|
768.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
768.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
821.4 |
|
|
|
108.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930.0 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
128.8 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
|
692.6 |
|
|
|
103.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
796.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Assets and Deferred Debits |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,507.6 |
|
|
$ |
107.1 |
|
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
|
$ |
1,611.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
Taxes accrued |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Interest accrued |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Natural gas imbalance payables |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
3.4 |
|
Note payable affiliates |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
73.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt |
|
|
400.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Credit and Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred credits and other liabilities |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.4 |
|
Common units |
|
|
699.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
699.3 |
|
Subordinated units |
|
|
303.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303.5 |
|
General partner units |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital |
|
|
1,025.3 |
|
|
|
98.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,123.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Partners Capital |
|
$ |
1,507.6 |
|
|
$ |
107.1 |
|
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
|
$ |
1,611.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The historical Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007 has been recast to retroactively
reflect the Saltville acquisition, as presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Saltville |
|
|
Recast |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
40.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
45.0 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Deferred
income tax expense |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
Investment expenditures |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to parent |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
Transfers to parent, net |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
|
|
(32.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Partners Capital. The historical Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Partners Capital for the six months ended June 30, 2007 has been recast to
retroactively reflect the Saltville acquisition, as presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Saltville |
|
|
Recast |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
989.1 |
|
|
$ |
108.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,097.1 |
|
Net income attributable to predecessor operations |
|
|
40.8 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
Reclassification of cash flow hedges into earnings |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Net change in parent advances |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
Dividends to parent |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,009.1 |
|
|
$ |
100.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,109.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
3. Income Taxes
Income taxes with respect to Spectra Energy Partners East Tennessee and Saltville operations
were calculated by Spectra Energy Partners in 2007 on the basis of their separate company income
and deductions related to East Tennessee and Saltville, respectively, in accordance with
established practices of Spectra Energy. Effective July 2, 2007, as a result of Spectra Energy
Partners master limited partnership (MLP) structure, Spectra Energy Partners is no longer subject
to federal income taxes, but is still subject to Tennessee state income tax.
On April 4, 2008, Spectra Energy Partners completed the Saltville acquisition, which was
treated as a transfer of entities under common control as discussed in Note 1. Accordingly, the
income tax effects associated with Saltvilles operations prior to the acquisition are reflected in
the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, in the second quarter of 2008, in
connection with the acquisition and the resulting change in tax status of Saltville, $2.5 million
of accumulated deferred income tax liabilities were eliminated and recorded as a benefit to Income
Tax Expense (Benefit) on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Market Hub and Gulfstream are not subject to federal income tax, but rather the taxable income
or loss of these entities is reported on the income tax returns of the respective members. Market
Hub is subject to Texas income (margin) taxes under a tax sharing agreement with Spectra Energy.
4. Business Segments
Prior to the Saltville acquisition, East Tennessee was considered the sole reportable segment
for Spectra Energy Partners. Effective upon completion of the acquisition, Spectra Energy Partners
created a new business segment, Gas Transportation and Storage, that aligns the operations of
Spectra Energy Partners with the chief operating decision makers view of the business. All prior
periods presented have been recast to conform the business segment disclosures to the new
segment structure. Spectra Energy Partners business segment is considered the sole reportable
segment under the guidance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.
Gas Transportation and Storage includes East Tennessee and Saltville. This segment provides
interstate transportation and storage of natural gas and the storage and redelivery of liquefied
natural gas (LNG) for customers in the southeastern United States. These operations are primarily
subject to the FERC and the Department of Transportations (DOT) rules and regulations.
The remainder of Spectra Energy Partners operations is presented as Other. While it is not
considered a business segment, Other primarily includes Spectra Energy Partners equity investments
in Gulfstream and Market Hub, other investments and certain unallocated corporate costs.
Gulfstream provides interstate natural gas pipeline transportation for customers in central
and southern Florida. Gulfstreams operations are subject to the rules and regulations of FERC and
DOT.
Market Hub owns and operates two natural gas storage facilities, Moss Bluff and Egan, which
are located in Southeast Texas and South Central Louisiana, respectively. Market Hubs operations
are subject to the rules and regulations of DOT. Moss Bluff is also subject to the rules and
regulations of the Texas Railroad Commission. Egan is also subject to the rules and regulations of
FERC.
13
Management evaluates segment performance based on earnings before interest and taxes
from continuing operations (EBIT). On a segment basis, EBIT represents all profits from continuing
operations (both operating and non-operating) before deducting interest and taxes.
Business Segment Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Transportation and Storage |
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
$ |
29.4 |
|
|
$ |
62.2 |
|
|
$ |
61.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
$ |
29.4 |
|
|
$ |
62.2 |
|
|
$ |
61.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment EBIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Transportation and Storage |
|
$ |
15.2 |
|
|
$ |
20.5 |
|
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
|
$ |
37.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total EBIT |
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
56.7 |
|
|
|
60.7 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
$ |
25.3 |
|
|
$ |
30.1 |
|
|
$ |
50.2 |
|
|
$ |
56.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Segment Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Transportation and Storage |
|
$ |
975.9 |
|
|
$ |
968.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
628.3 |
|
|
|
643.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,604.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,611.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Regulatory Matters
Saltville.
In April 2008, Saltville initiated a rate proceeding to satisfy
a certificate condition relating to a cost and revenue study, and to
reflect certain changes in costs and revenues from assumptions
underlying current rates. The
proposed rates were accepted by the FERC in April 2008, subject to a five-month suspension, to
become effective September 1, 2008, subject to refund pending conclusion of the rate proceeding. A
hearing is scheduled for January 27, 2009.
6. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes net income and all other non-owner changes in equity. Components
of comprehensive income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
27.5 |
|
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
$ |
51.6 |
|
|
$ |
45.0 |
|
Unrealized
mark-to-market net gain on hedges |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of cash flow hedges into earnings |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
27.8 |
|
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
|
$ |
51.8 |
|
|
$ |
44.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
7. Net Income Per Limited Partner Unit and Cash Distributions
Spectra Energy Partners calculates net income per limited partner unit in accordance with
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class
Method under FASB Statement No. 128. Undistributed earnings for a period are allocated to a
participating security based on the contractual participation rights of the security to share in
those earnings as if all of the earnings for the period had been distributed.
Net income per limited partner unit is computed by dividing the limited partners interest in
net income by the weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding. The limited
partners interest in net income is determined by first allocating net income to the general
partner based upon the general partners 2% ownership interest
and incentive distribution rights held. Although Spectra Energy
Partners has not reached the Available Cash levels that would require
incentive distributions to the general partner, in accordance with
EITF Issue No. 03-6, net income levels above the incentive
distribution level must be allocated to the general partner for
purposes of calculating net income per limited partner unit. Diluted net income per limited
partner unit reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other agreements to
issue common units, such as phantom unit awards, were exercised, settled or converted into common
units.
The following table presents Spectra Energy Partners net income per limited partner unit
calculations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
(in millions, except per-unit amounts) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
27.5 |
|
|
$ |
51.6 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to predecessor operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
General partners interest in net income 2% |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
General partners interest in net income
attributable to incentive distribution rights |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
26.4 |
|
|
$ |
48.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocable to common units |
|
$ |
18.3 |
|
|
$ |
33.2 |
|
Net income allocable to subordinated units |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
26.4 |
|
|
$ |
48.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding
basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units |
|
|
48.8 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
Subordinated units |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per limited partner unit basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
Subordinated units |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding, and basic and diluted net income per
limited partner unit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 are not presented since
Spectra Energy Partners was not formed until July 2, 2007.
The partnership agreement requires that, within 45 days after the end of each quarter, Spectra
Energy Partners distribute all of its Available Cash, as defined, to unitholders of record on the applicable
record date.
Available Cash. Available Cash, for any quarter, consists of all cash on hand at the end of
that quarter:
|
|
|
less the amount of cash reserves established by the general partner to: |
|
|
|
provide for the proper conduct of business, |
|
|
|
|
comply with applicable law, any debt instrument or other agreement, or |
|
|
|
|
provide funds for distributions to the unitholders and to the general
partner for any one or more of the next four quarters, |
|
|
|
plus, if the general partner so determines, all or a portion of cash on hand on
the date of determination of Available Cash for the quarter. |
15
Subordinated Units. All of the subordinated units are held by a wholly owned subsidiary of
Spectra Energy. The partnership agreement provides that, during the subordination period, the
common units have the right to receive distributions of Available Cash each quarter in an amount
equal to $0.30 per common unit (the Minimum Quarterly Distribution), plus any arrearages in the
payment of the Minimum Quarterly Distribution on the common units from prior quarters, before any
distributions of Available Cash may be made on the subordinated units. Furthermore, no arrearages
will be paid on the subordinated units. The practical effect of the subordinated units is to
increase the likelihood that during the subordination period there will be Available Cash to be
distributed on the common units. The subordination period will end, and the subordinated units will
convert to common units, on a one-for-one basis, when certain distribution requirements, as defined
in the partnership agreement, have been met. It is currently estimated that the subordination
period will not end during 2008.
Incentive Distribution Rights. The general partner holds incentive distribution rights in
accordance with the partnership agreement as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Quarterly |
|
Marginal Percentage |
|
|
Distribution |
|
Interest in Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
|
|
Target Amount |
|
Unitholders |
|
General Partner |
Minimum Quarterly Distribution |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
First Target Distribution |
|
up to $0.345 |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Second Target Distribution |
|
above $0.345 up to $0.375 |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Third Target Distribution |
|
above $0.375 up to $0.45 |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
Thereafter |
|
above $0.45 |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
To the extent these incentive distributions are made to the general partner, there will be
more Available Cash proportionately allocated to the general partner than to holders of common and
subordinated units.
8. Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
Spectra Energy Partners investments in unconsolidated affiliates consist of a 24.5% interest
in Gulfstream and a 50% interest in Market Hub. Spectra Energy Partners received distributions from
Gulfstream of $14.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008 and $3.7 million
during the same period in 2007. Spectra Energy Partners received
distributions from Market Hub of $21.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008 and none
during the same period in 2007.
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Gulfstream |
|
$ |
230.9 |
|
|
$ |
211.3 |
|
Market Hub |
|
|
294.9 |
|
|
|
283.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
525.8 |
|
|
$ |
495.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Gulfstream |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
Market Hub |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
|
$ |
27.6 |
|
|
$ |
23.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Summarized Financial Information of Unconsolidated Affiliates (Presented at 100%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(in millions) |
Gulfstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
51.6 |
|
|
$ |
46.2 |
|
|
$ |
92.4 |
|
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
62.7 |
|
|
|
57.6 |
|
Net income |
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Hub |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
25.2 |
|
|
$ |
23.5 |
|
|
$ |
47.1 |
|
|
$ |
44.3 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
31.0 |
|
Net income |
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
9. Debt and Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration |
|
Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving |
|
|
Credit Facility Summary |
|
Date |
|
Capacity |
|
Term Loan |
|
Loan |
|
Total |
|
|
(in millions) |
Spectra Energy Partners, LP |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
$ |
500.0 |
|
|
$ |
94.0 |
|
|
$ |
146.0 |
|
|
$ |
240.0 |
|
Spectra Energy Partners obligations under the revolving portion of its credit facility are
unsecured and the term borrowings are secured by qualifying investment-grade securities in an
amount equal to or greater than the outstanding principal amount of the loan. The terms of the
credit facility allow for liquidation of collateral to fund capital expenditures or certain
acquisitions provided that an equal amount of term loan is converted to a revolving loan.
Investments in marketable securities totaling $94.9 million at June 30, 2008
and $154.6 million at December 31, 2007 were pledged as collateral against
the term loan. These investments are classified as Investments and Other Assets Other Investments
on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The credit facility prohibits Spectra Energy Partners
from making distributions of Available Cash to unitholders if any default or event of default, as
defined, exists. In addition, the credit facility contains covenants, among others, limiting
Spectra Energy Partners ability to make other restricted distributions or dividends on account of
the purchase, redemption, retirement, acquisition, cancellation or termination of partnership
interests, and is also subject to certain financial covenants. As of June 30, 2008, Spectra Energy
Partners was in compliance with those covenants. The credit facility does not contain material
adverse change clauses.
Long-term debt includes East Tennessees 5.71% unsecured notes payable totaling $150.0 million
as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. East Tennessees debt agreement contains financial
covenants which limit the amount of debt that can be outstanding as a percentage of total capital.
Failure to maintain the covenants could require East Tennessee to immediately pay down the
outstanding balance. As of June 30, 2008, East Tennessee was in compliance with those covenants. In
addition, the debt agreement allows for acceleration of payments or termination of the agreements
due to nonpayment, or to the acceleration of other significant indebtedness of the borrower or some
of its subsidiaries, if any. The debt agreement does not contain material adverse change clauses.
17
10. Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, Spectra Energy Partners adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, for financial assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 requires entities to, among other things, maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or
paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the
asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
SFAS No. 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to
those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data
obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect Spectra Energy
Partners market assumptions. In accordance with SFAS No. 157, these two types
of inputs have created the following fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for
identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived
valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in
active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Model derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or
significant value drivers are unobservable. |
The following table presents for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, Spectra Energy
Partners assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2008. There
were no liabilities measured at fair value at June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description |
|
Balance Sheet Caption |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
Investments and other assets-other |
|
|
94.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
109.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Valuation Techniques
Fair values of Spectra Energy Partners available-for-sale securities, primarily fixed-income
debt instruments that are actively traded in the secondary market are determined based on
market-based prices. These valuations may include inputs such as quoted market prices of the exact
or similar instruments, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources that may
include models or matrix pricing tools, with reasonable levels of price transparency.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental. Spectra Energy Partners operating businesses are subject to federal, state and
local regulations regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal and other
environmental matters. Management believes there are no matters outstanding that will have a
material adverse effect on Spectra Energy Partners consolidated results of operations, financial
position or cash flows.
Litigation. Spectra Energy Partners is involved in legal, tax and regulatory proceedings in
various forums, including matters regarding contracts, performance and other matters, arising in
the ordinary course of business, some of which involve substantial monetary amounts. Spectra Energy
Partners has insurance coverage for certain of these losses should they be incurred. Management
believes that the final disposition of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on
Spectra Energy Partners consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
12. Interest Rate Hedges
In June 2008, Spectra Energy Partners entered into a series of two and three-year interest
rate swap agreements with Spectra Energy to mitigate Spectra Energy Partners exposure to variable
interest rates on $140 million of loans outstanding under the revolving loan facility. These
interest rate swaps were designated as effective cash flow hedges. For the period ended June 30,
2008, these hedges resulted in no ineffectiveness, and unrealized net gains on the agreements have
been deferred in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI) in the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets. It is estimated that $0.6 million of the amount
reported in AOCI at June 30, 2008
will be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months.
At inception, Spectra Energy Partners prepares documentation of hedges in accordance with SFAS
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instrument and Hedging Activities, as amended. Spectra Energy
Partners documents hedging activity by transaction type and risk management strategy. Changes in
the fair value of a derivative designated and qualified as a cash flow hedge, to the extent
effective, are included in AOCI until earnings are affected by the hedged transaction. Hedge
accounting is discontinued prospectively when it is determined that a derivative no longer
qualifies as an effective hedge, or when it is no longer probable that the hedged forecasted
transaction will occur. When hedge accounting is discontinued because the derivative no longer
qualifies as an effective hedge, the derivative is subject to the mark-to-market model of
accounting prospectively.
18
13. New Accounting Pronouncements
The following new accounting pronouncements were adopted during the six months ended June 30,
2008:
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the
FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB
Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for
Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13. Also in February 2008, the
FASB issued FSP No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delays the effective
date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statement on a recurring basis (at least annually). The adoption of SFAS No. 157 and FSP
No. FAS 157-1 by Spectra Energy Partners effective January 1, 2008 did not have a material impact
on Spectra Energy Partners consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
See Note 10 for further discussion. Spectra Energy Partners has elected to defer the adoption of
SFAS No. 157 for its goodwill impairment test until 2009 as permitted.
SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, which permits entities to choose to measure certain
financial instruments at fair value. Spectra Energy Partners has determined it will not elect fair
value measurements for financial assets and financial liabilities included in the scope of SFAS No.
159.
The following new accounting pronouncements have been issued, but have not yet been adopted as
of June 30, 2008:
SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations. In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R which
replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141R requires the acquiring entity in a
business combination to recognize all and only the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the
transaction, establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all
assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and
other users all of the information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial
effect of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and cannot be early adopted.
SFAS
No. 161 Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 which amends and expands
the disclosure requirements for SFAS No. 133 with the intent to
provide users of financial statements an enhanced understanding of
how and why derivative instruments are used, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for
under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations and how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is
effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning on or after November 15, 2008.
EITF 07-04, Application of the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings per
Share, to Master Limited Partnerships. In March 2008, the FASB ratified a consensus reached by the
EITF that addresses the application of the two-class method for MLPs when incentive distribution
rights (IDRs) are present and entitle the IDR holder to a portion of distributions. The final consensus states that when
earnings exceed
distributions, the computation of earnings per unit (EPU) should be based on the terms of the
partnership agreement. Accordingly, any contractual limitations on the distributions to IDR holders
(e.g., limitations that only entitle IDR holders to available cash) would need to be determined
for each reporting period. The guidance in EITF 07-4 is effective for periods that begin after
December 15, 2008, and would be accounted for as a change in accounting principle through
retrospective application. Early application is not permitted. No change to Spectra Energy
Partners current practice of computing net income per limited partner unit is anticipated until
such time that Spectra Energy Partners reaches its IDR thresholds.
FSP No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets. In April 2008,
the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3 which amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FSP No. FAS 142-3 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. Spectra Energy Partners does not expect the adoption of FSP No. FAS
142-3 to have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations, financial position or
cash flows.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
INTRODUCTION
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should
be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Executive Overview
As discussed in Note 2 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, on April 4,
2008, Spectra Energy Partners completed the acquisition of the equity interests of Saltville and
the P-25 pipeline from Spectra Energy for a purchase price of $107 million. The Saltville
acquisition represented a transaction among entities under common control. Accordingly, the
condensed consolidated financial statements and related information presented herein have been
recast to include the historical results of Saltville and the P-25 pipeline for all periods
presented.
Effective upon the completion of the Saltville acquisition, Spectra Energy Partners created a
new business segment, Gas Transportation and Storage, which includes East Tennessee and Saltville,
and aligns the operations of Spectra Energy Partners with the chief operating decision makers view
of the business. All prior period information discussed herein has been recast to reflect the
new segment structure.
19
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, Spectra Energy Partners reported net income of $27.5
million compared to net income of $23.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. For the
six months ended June 30, 2008, Spectra Energy Partners reported net income of $51.6 million
compared to net income of $45.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increases
resulted primarily from higher demand for transportation and storage services, and the absence of
federal income tax expense due to the formation of the MLP in 2007, partially offset by lower net
pipeline fuel recoveries recognized, and general and administrative costs associated with managing
Spectra Energy Partners post-IPO.
The consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial position for periods prior to
Spectra Energy Partners IPO on July 2, 2007 and for periods prior to the Saltville acquisition may
not necessarily be indicative of the actual results of operations, cash flows and financial
position had those entities operated separately during those periods.
Spectra Energy Partners continues to deliver on its primary business objective of increasing
cash distributions per unit. A cash distribution to unitholders of $0.32 per unit was paid in the
first quarter of 2008, representing a 7% increase over the cash distribution paid in the previous
quarter, and a cash distribution of $0.33 per unit was paid in April 2008, representing a 3%
increase over the previous distribution. A cash distribution of $0.34 per unit was declared in
July 2008, representing a 3% increase over the previous distribution and the third consecutive
quarterly increase.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
29.7 |
|
|
$ |
29.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
62.2 |
|
|
$ |
61.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Operating, maintenance and other expense |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Other income and expenses, net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
27.5 |
|
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
51.6 |
|
|
$ |
45.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA (a) |
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
|
$ |
25.8 |
|
|
$ |
(6.3 |
) |
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
48.5 |
|
|
$ |
(6.7 |
) |
Cash Available for Distribution (a) |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
58.3 |
|
|
|
66.1 |
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For a reconciliation of this measure to its most directly comparable financial measures
calculated and presented in
accordance with GAAP, see Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures. |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to June 30, 2007
Operating
Revenues. The $0.3 million increase was driven primarily by
a $1.4 million increase from new firm
transportation contracts on East Tennessees Patriot system, partially offset by the absence of
$1.1 million of salt sales during the second quarter of 2008 due to the sale of the
salt plant in the second quarter of 2007.
Operating, Maintenance and Other Expense. The $6.6 million increase was driven primarily by:
|
|
|
a $6.3 million net increase from lower net pipeline fuel recoveries recognized by East
Tennessee in the 2008 period compared to the 2007 period which included an
adjustment of estimated fuel recoveries, and |
|
|
|
|
a $1.5 million increase in general and administrative costs as a result of new
corporate functions associated with managing Spectra Energy Partners post-IPO, partially
offset by, |
|
|
|
|
an $0.8 million decrease from lower labor and outside services costs related to the
timing of various pipeline operations activities, and |
|
|
|
|
a $0.6 million decrease due to the capitalization of previously expensed project
development costs. |
20
Depreciation and Amortization. The $0.9 million increase was driven primarily by the Jewell
Ridge expansion project.
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates. The $3.4 million increase consisted of a $2.7
million increase in equity earnings from Gulfstream and a $0.7 million increase from Market Hub.
The following discussion explains the factors affecting the equity earnings of Gulfstream and
Market Hub, each representing 100% of the earnings drivers of those entities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Gulfstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
51.6 |
|
|
$ |
46.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
Operating, maintenance and other expense |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Other income and expenses, net |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spectra Energy Partners 24.5% share |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulfstream Owned 24.5%
Gulfstreams net income increased by $9.8 million to $27.3 million for three-month period in
2008 compared to $17.5 million for the same period in 2007. The increase was driven primarily by:
|
|
|
a $5.4 million increase in revenues driven by a higher demand for interruptible and
short-term firm transportation from generation customers caused by warmer weather and the
favorable gas-to-fuel-oil price differential compared to the prior period, |
|
|
|
|
a $2.0 million increase in other income and expenses, net driven primarily by a $1.9
million increase in allowance for funds used during construction
(AFUDC) as a result of capital expenditures for Gulfstreams Phase III and Phase IV expansion projects, |
|
|
|
|
a $1.2 million decrease in operating, maintenance and other expense due primarily to a
$1.8 million reduction in project development expenses compared to the prior-year period,
partially offset by higher pipeline operations costs associated with overhauls in 2008, and |
|
|
|
|
a $0.9 million decrease in interest expense resulting from higher interest costs
capitalized as a result of capital expenditures for Gulfstreams Phase III and Phase IV
expansion projects. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Market Hub |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
25.2 |
|
|
$ |
23.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
Operating, maintenance and other expense |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16.8 |
|
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spectra Energy Partners 50% share |
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Hub Owned 50%
Market Hubs net income increased by $2.1 million to $16.8 million for the three-month period
in 2008 compared to $14.7 million for the same period in 2007. The increase was driven primarily
by:
|
|
|
a $1.7 million increase in revenues driven by an increase of $3.6 million in firm
storage revenues due to the completion of the Egan Cavern 4 expansion, partially offset by
a decrease in interruptible services of $1.9 million driven by market demand, |
|
|
|
|
a $0.7 million increase in interest income due to notes receivable with affiliates
issued in the third quarter of 2007, and |
21
|
|
|
a $0.7 million decrease in interest expense primarily due to lower interest rates
associated with collateral held from affiliates, partially offset by |
|
|
|
|
a $0.5 million increase in operating, maintenance and other expense due primarily to
lower fuel recoveries comparing 2008 to 2007, and |
|
|
|
|
a $0.5 million increase in depreciation expense primarily due to the Egan expansion. |
Interest Income. The $0.8 million increase was due to interest earned on marketable securities
purchased with a portion of the IPO proceeds in July 2007. These securities are pledged as
collateral to secure the term loan portion of Spectra Energy Partners credit facility entered into
on July 2, 2007.
Interest Expense. The $1.7 million increase was due to the term and revolver borrowings
entered into on July 2, 2007.
Income
Tax Expense (Benefit). Spectra Energy Partners income tax
benefit for the three months ended June
30, 2008 was $2.2 million compared to income tax expense of $6.2 million in the same period in
2007. Effective July 2, 2007, as a result of Spectra Energy Partners MLP structure, Spectra Energy
Partners is no longer subject to federal income taxes. In addition, a tax benefit of $2.5 million
was recognized in 2008 due to the elimination of accumulated deferred
income tax liabilities associated with the
Saltville entities change in tax status as a result of the acquisition by Spectra Energy Partners.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to June 30, 2007
Operating
Revenues. The $0.4 million increase was driven primarily by
a $2.9 million increase from new firm
transportation contracts on East Tennessees Jewell Ridge lateral and Patriot systems, partially
offset by the absence of $2.5 million of salt sales during 2008
due to the sale of the salt plant in the second quarter of 2007.
Operating, Maintenance and Other Expense. The $7.1 million increase was driven primarily by:
|
|
|
a $4.7 million increase from lower net pipeline fuel recoveries recognized by East
Tennessee in the 2008 period compared to the 2007 period, and |
|
|
|
|
a $2.6 million increase in general and administrative costs as a result of new
corporate functions associated with managing Spectra Energy Partners post-IPO. |
Depreciation and Amortization. The $1.9 million increase was driven primarily by the Jewell
Ridge expansion project.
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates. The $4.6 million increase consisted of a $3.3
million increase in equity earnings from Gulfstream and a $1.3 million increase from Market Hub.
The following discussion explains the factors affecting the equity earnings of Gulfstream and
Market Hub, each representing 100% of the earnings drivers of those entities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Gulfstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
92.4 |
|
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
Operating, maintenance and other expense |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Other income and expenses, net |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
46.2 |
|
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spectra Energy Partners 24.5% share |
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Gulfstream Owned 24.5%
Gulfstreams net income increased by $11.6 million to $46.2 million for the six-month period
in 2008 compared to $34.6 million for the same period in 2007. The increase was driven primarily
by:
|
|
|
an $8.2 million increase in revenues driven by a higher demand for interruptible and
short-term firm transportation from generation customers caused by warmer weather and the
favorable gas-to-fuel-oil price differential compared to the prior period, |
|
|
|
|
a $5.0 million increase in other income and expenses, net driven primarily by a $3.1
million increase in AFUDC as a result of capital expenditures for Gulfstreams
Phase III and Phase IV expansion projects, and a $1.0 million
increase related to the favorable resolution of a sales and use tax matter during the
second quarter of 2008, and |
|
|
|
|
a $1.5 million decrease in interest expense resulting from higher interest costs
capitalized as a result of capital expenditures for Gulfstreams Phase III and Phase IV
expansion projects, partially offset by |
|
|
|
|
a $3.6 million increase in operating, maintenance and other expense primarily resulting
from a $6.0 million increase in ad valorem tax expense due to the impact of a favorable
valuation in the first quarter of 2007 and $1.8 million of higher pipeline operations costs
associated with overhauls in 2008, partially offset by a $3.8 million reduction in project
development expenses compared to the prior-year period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Market Hub |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
47.1 |
|
|
$ |
44.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
Operating, maintenance and other expense |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Other income and expenses, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
32.5 |
|
|
$ |
29.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spectra Energy Partners 50% share |
|
$ |
15.8 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Hub Owned 50%
Market Hubs net income increased by $3.4 million to $32.5 million for the six-month period in
2008 compared to $29.1 million for the same period in 2007. The increase was driven primarily by:
|
|
|
a $2.8 million increase in revenues driven by an increase of $4.2 million in firm
storage revenues due to the completion of the Egan Cavern 4 expansion, partially offset by
a decrease in interruptible services of $1.5 million driven by
market demand, |
|
|
|
|
a $1.7 million increase in interest income due to notes receivable with affiliates
issued in the third quarter of 2007, and |
|
|
|
|
a $1.3 million decrease in interest expense primarily due to lower interest rates
associated with collateral held from affiliates, partially offset by |
|
|
|
|
a $1.2 million increase in operating, maintenance and other expense resulting primarily
from $0.7 million of lower fuel recoveries and a $0.4 million increase in ad valorem tax
expense primarily due to a reduction in the first quarter 2007 related to a favorable
valuation, and |
|
|
|
|
a $1.0 million increase in depreciation expense primarily due to the Egan expansion. |
Interest
Income. The $2.3 million increase was due to interest earned on marketable securities
purchased with a portion of the IPO proceeds in July 2007. These securities are pledged as
collateral to secure the term loan portion of Spectra Energy Partners credit facility entered into
on July 2, 2007.
Interest Expense. The $4.5 million increase was due to the term and revolver borrowings
entered into on July 2, 2007.
Income
Tax Expense (Benefit). Spectra Energy Partners income tax benefit for the six months ended June
30, 2008 was $1.4 million compared to income tax expense of $11.4 million in the same period in
2007. Effective July 2, 2007, as a result of Spectra Energy Partners MLP
structure, Spectra Energy Partners is no longer subject to federal income taxes. In
addition, a tax benefit of $2.5 million was recognized in 2008
due to the elimination of accumulated deferred
income tax liabilities associated with the Saltville entities change in tax status as a result of the
acquisition by Spectra Energy Partners.
23
Spectra Energy Partners Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Available for Distribution
Adjusted EBITDA
Spectra Energy Partners defines its Adjusted Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA) as Net Income plus Interest Expense, Income Taxes and Depreciation and
Amortization less Equity in Earnings of Gulfstream and Market Hub, Interest Income, and Other
Income and Expenses, Net, which primarily consists of non-cash AFUDC. Spectra Energy Partners
Adjusted EBITDA is not a presentation made in accordance with GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA
excludes some, but not all, items that affect net income and is defined differently by companies in
Spectra Energy Partners industry, Spectra Energy Partners definition of Adjusted EBITDA may not
be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
Adjusted EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial measure by Spectra Energy Partners
management and by external users of Spectra Energy Partners financial statements to assess:
|
|
|
the financial performance of assets without regard to financing methods, capital
structure or historical cost basis; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to generate cash sufficient to pay interest on indebtedness and to make
distributions to partners; and |
|
|
|
|
operating performance and return on invested capital as compared to those of other
publicly traded limited partnerships that own energy infrastructure assets, without regard
to financing methods and capital structure. |
Significant drivers of variances in Adjusted EBITDA between the periods presented are
substantially the same as those previously discussed under Results of Operations. Other drivers
include the timing of certain cash outflows, such as capital expenditures for maintenance and the
scheduled payments of interest.
Cash Available for Distribution
Spectra Energy Partners defines its Cash Available for Distribution as Spectra Energy
Partners Adjusted EBITDA plus Cash Available for Distribution from Gulfstream and Market Hub, less
cash paid for interest expense, net, and maintenance capital expenditures. Cash Available for
Distribution does not reflect changes in working capital balances. Cash Available for Distribution
for 2008 reflects the incremental general and administrative expenses associated with being a
publicly-traded partnership.
For Gulfstream and Market Hub, Spectra Energy Partners defines their Cash Available for
Distribution as their Adjusted EBITDA less cash paid for interest expense, net, and maintenance
capital expenditures. Cash Available for Distribution does not reflect changes in their working
capital balances.
Cash Available for Distribution should not be viewed as indicative of the actual amount of
cash available for distribution or that Spectra Energy Partners plans to distribute for a given
period.
Cash Available for Distribution should not be considered an alternative to net income,
operating income, cash from operations or any other measure of financial performance or liquidity
presented in accordance with GAAP. Cash Available for Distribution excludes some, but not all,
items that affect net income and operating income and these measures may vary among other
companies. Therefore, Cash Available for Distribution as presented may not be comparable to
similarly titled measures of other companies.
Significant drivers of variances in Cash Available for Distribution between the periods
presented are substantially the same as those previously discussed under Results of Operations.
Other drivers include the timing of certain cash outflows, such as capital expenditures for
maintenance and the scheduled payments of interest.
24
Spectra Energy Partners
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Available for Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
27.5 |
|
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
$ |
51.6 |
|
|
$ |
45.0 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
11.4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of Gulfstream |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Equity in earnings of Market Hub |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
48.5 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Available for Distribution from Gulfstream |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Cash Available for Distribution from Market Hub |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest expense, net |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Maintenance capital expenditures |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Available for Distribution |
|
$ |
21.8 |
|
|
$ |
27.4 |
|
|
$ |
58.3 |
|
|
$ |
66.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spectra Energy Partners
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Available for Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
36.0 |
|
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
$ |
74.0 |
|
|
$ |
37.9 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Income tax expense current |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Distributions received from Gulfstream and
Market Hub |
|
|
(15.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
Changes in operating working capital and other |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
48.5 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Available for Distribution from Gulfstream |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Cash Available for Distribution from Market Hub |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest expense, net |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Maintenance capital expenditures |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Available for Distribution |
|
$ |
21.8 |
|
|
$ |
27.4 |
|
|
$ |
58.3 |
|
|
$ |
66.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Gulfstream
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Available for Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
$ |
46.2 |
|
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA 100% |
|
|
43.1 |
|
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
77.4 |
|
|
|
72.8 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest expense, net |
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
Maintenance capital expenditures |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Available for Distribution 100% |
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
$ |
52.0 |
|
|
$ |
48.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA 24.5% |
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
19.0 |
|
|
$ |
17.8 |
|
Cash Available for Distribution 24.5% |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Market Hub
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Available for Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
16.8 |
|
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
|
$ |
32.5 |
|
|
$ |
29.1 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA 100% |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Available for Distribution 100% |
|
$ |
18.8 |
|
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
36.2 |
|
|
$ |
32.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA 50% |
|
$ |
9.5 |
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
18.4 |
|
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
Cash Available for Distribution 50% |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
26
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Operating Cash Flows
Net
cash provided by operating activities increased $36.1 million to
$74.0 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This increase was driven by a $32.1
million increase in distributions received from equity affiliates, primarily Market Hub. Effective
with the IPO of Spectra Energy Partners, Market Hub is required to make distributions of its
Available Cash to its partners, including Spectra Energy Partners.
Net
working capital was negative $28.8 million as of June 30,
2008 compared to negative $37.3
million as of December 31, 2007, both of which included the $50.0 million note payable on demand to
Market Hub. Spectra Energy Partners does not expect Market Hub to demand payment on this note
during 2008. Spectra Energy Partners will rely primarily upon cash flows from operations and
additional financing transactions to fund its liquidity and capital requirements for the next 12
months. Future additional sources of liquidity include borrowings under the credit facility, cash
realized from the liquidation of securities that are currently pledged under the credit facility,
issuances of additional partnership units and/or debt offerings.
Investing Cash Flows
Cash flows used by investing activities totaled $2.3 million in the first six months of 2008
compared to $5.8 million during the same period in 2007. The change was driven primarily by:
|
|
|
net proceeds totaling $59.7 million in 2008 from the liquidation of available-for-sale
securities that were held as collateral for the term loan. As permitted by the terms of the
credit facility, proceeds were used for capital and investment
expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
a $38.5 million increase in investment expenditures representing capital contributions to
Gulfstream and Market Hub in 2008 used to fund their expansion projects, |
|
|
|
|
the $4.7 million cash portion of the acquisition of Saltville in the 2008 second quarter,
and |
|
|
|
|
proceeds from sales of assets in 2007 of $8.3 million. |
Capital and investment expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2008 totaled $57.3
million and included $50.2 million for expansion projects, primarily at Gulfstream and Market Hub,
and $7.1 million for East Tennessee maintenance projects. Spectra Energy Partners estimates total
2008 capital and investment expenditures of approximately
$135 million, of which $40 million is
expected to be used for expansion projects, $10 million for maintenance and other projects, and $85 million in
projected capital contributions to Gulfstream and Market Hub.
In response to increased Appalachian production activity, East Tennessee held the Greenway
Project open season in February 2008 and received overwhelming demand for new capacity. These open
season results provide opportunities for large multi-year projects. In addition, East Tennessee has
smaller project opportunities from this open season that can be completed within the existing
right-of-ways, like Greenway/Nora, the first project arising from the Greenway open season.
Construction has begun and it is expected that this project will be in service by year-end 2008.
East Tennessee continues to evaluate additional opportunities arising from the Greenway open season
and is finalizing plans for a multi-year program.
Given Spectra Energy Partners objective of growth through acquisitions and expansions of
existing assets, Spectra Energy Partners anticipates that it will continue to invest significant
amounts of capital to grow and acquire assets. Expansion capital expenditures may vary
significantly based on investment opportunities.
Financing Cash Flows
Net
cash used in financing activities totaled $56.2 million in the first six months of 2008
compared to $32.1 million provided in the same prior-year period. 2008 activity includes $45.4
million of distributions to partners, compared to dividends and net transfers to parent totaling
$32.1 million in the 2007 period. Also included in 2008 was a $10.0 million net reduction in
long-term debt. During the first half of 2008, in connection with the liquidation of the securities
held as collateral for the term debt, $59.0 million of term loan debt was converted into revolving
loan debt. Increases and decreases of revolving loan debt are presented gross in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Prior to the completion of the IPO, all of Spectra Energy Partners excess cash flow was
distributed as dividends and net transfers to Spectra Energy. As a result, the changes in cash
provided by operating activities and cash used in investing activities were offset by cash flows of
financing activities.
Available Credit Facility and Restrictive Debt Covenants. See Note 9 of Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the available credit facility and related
financial and other covenants.
Cash Distributions. As previously discussed, a cash distribution to unitholders of $0.32 per
unit was paid in the first quarter of 2008 and another distribution of $0.33 per unit was paid in
the second quarter of 2008. A cash distribution of $0.34 per unit was declared on July 24, 2008,
payable on August 14, 2008 to unitholders of record at the close of business on August 5, 2008.
27
OTHER ISSUES
New Accounting Pronouncements
See
Note 13 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Spectra Energy Partners exposure to market risk is described in Item 7A of its Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Except as
related to the interest rate swap agreements entered into in June 2008 as
described in Note 12 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,
management believes the exposure to market risk
has not changed materially at June 30, 2008.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by Spectra Energy Partners in the reports it files
or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls
and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed by Spectra Energy Partners in the reports it
files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management of Spectra Energy Partners
General Partner, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Spectra Energy
Partners has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2008, and, based
upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that
these controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
On May 14, 2008, Spectra Energy Partners announced the retirement of Lon C. Mitchell, Jr. as
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner
of Spectra Energy Partners, and also announced that Spectra Energy Partners board of directors
appointed Laura Buss Sayavedra to replace Mr. Mitchell as Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, effective July 1, 2008.
Under the supervision and with the participation of the management of Spectra Energy Partners
General Partner, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Spectra Energy
Partners has evaluated changes in internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2008 and found no change that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, careful consideration should be
given to the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in Spectra Energy Partners
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which could materially affect
Spectra Energy Partners financial condition or future results. There were no changes to those risk
factors at June 30, 2008.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
28
Item 6. Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
* 31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* 31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* 32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* 32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
its general partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
its general partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 12, 2008 |
|
/s/ C. Gregory Harper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Gregory Harper |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 12, 2008 |
|
/s/ Laura Buss Sayavedra |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laura Buss Sayavedra |
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC |
|
|
29
Index to Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
* 31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* 31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* 32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* 32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |