e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File
No. 001-33732
Northfield Bancorp,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
United States of America
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
42-1572539
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1410 St. Georges Avenue, Avenel, New Jersey
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
|
|
07001
Zip Code
|
(732) 499-7200
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC
|
|
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. YES þ NO o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). YES o NO þ.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). YES o NO þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by
reference to price at which the common equity was last sold on
June 30, 2010 was $230,793,136.
As of March 10, 2011, there were outstanding
43,104,421 shares of the Registrants common stock.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
the Registrant (Part III).
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC.
ANNUAL
REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PART I
Forward
Looking Statements
This Annual Report contains certain forward-looking
statements, which can be identified by the use of such
words as estimate, project, believe, intend, anticipate, plan,
seek, and similar expressions. These forward looking statements
include:
|
|
|
|
|
statements of our goals, intentions, and expectations;
|
|
|
|
statements regarding our business plans and prospects and growth
and operating strategies;
|
|
|
|
statements regarding the quality of our assets, including our
loan and investment portfolios; and
|
|
|
|
estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.
|
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant
risks, assumptions, and uncertainties, including, among other
things, the following important factors that could affect the
actual outcome of future events:
|
|
|
|
|
significantly increased competition among depository and other
financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that
reduce our interest margins or reduce the fair value of
financial instruments;
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market
areas, that are worse than expected;
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in the securities markets;
|
|
|
|
legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our
business;
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter new markets successfully and take advantage
of growth opportunities, and the possible dilutive effect of
potential acquisitions or de novo branches, if any;
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted
by bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB), or other promulgating authorities;
|
|
|
|
inability of third-party providers to perform their obligations
to us; and
|
|
|
|
changes in our organization, compensation, and benefit plans.
|
Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future
results may be materially different from the results indicated
by these forward-looking statements.
Northfield
Bancorp, MHC
Northfield Bancorp, MHC is a federally-chartered mutual holding
company and owns approximately 57% of the outstanding shares of
common stock of Northfield Bancorp, Inc., as of
December 31, 2010. Northfield Bancorp, MHC has not engaged
in any significant business activity other than owning the
common stock of Northfield Bancorp, Inc., and does not intend to
expand its business activities at this time. So long as
Northfield Bancorp, MHC exists, it is required to own a majority
of the voting stock of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. The home office
of Northfield Bancorp, MHC is located at 1731 Victory Boulevard,
Staten Island, New York, and its telephone number is
(718) 448-1000.
Northfield Bancorp, MHC is subject to comprehensive regulation
and examination by the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Northfield
Bancorp, Inc.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is a federal corporation that completed
its initial public stock offering on November 7, 2007.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s home office is located at 1410
St. Georges Avenue, Avenel, New Jersey 07001 and its telephone
number is
(732) 499-7200.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s significant business
1
activities have been holding the common stock of Northfield Bank
(the Bank) and investing the proceeds from its initial public
offering. Northfield Bancorp, Inc., as the holding company of
Northfield Bank, is authorized to pursue other business
activities permitted by applicable laws and regulations for
subsidiaries of federally-chartered mutual holding companies,
which may include the acquisition of banking and financial
services companies. In addition to the Bank, Northfield Bancorp,
Inc. also owns Northfield Investments, Inc., a New Jersey
investment company, which currently is inactive. When we use the
term Company, we, or our we
are referring to the activities of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and
its consolidated subsidiaries. When we refer to the holding
company we are referring to the stand-alone activities of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. When we refer to the Bank
we are referring to the activities of Northfield Bank and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
Holding Company cash flow depends on earnings on our investments
and from dividends received from Northfield Bank. Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. neither owns nor leases any property from outside
parties, but instead uses the premises, equipment, and furniture
of Northfield Bank. At the present time, we employ as officers
only certain persons who are also officers of Northfield Bank
and we use the support staff of Northfield Bank from time to
time. These persons are not separately compensated by Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. reimburses Northfield
Bank for significant costs incurred by the Bank on its behalf.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. may hire additional employees, as
appropriate, to the extent it expands its business in the future.
Northfield
Bank
Northfield Bank was organized in 1887 and is a federally
chartered savings bank. Northfield Bank conducts business
primarily from its home office located at 1731 Victory
Boulevard, Staten Island, New York, its operations center
located at 581 Main Street, Woodbridge, NJ, and its 19
additional branch offices located in New York and New Jersey.
The branch offices are located in the New York counties of
Richmond (Staten Island) and Kings (Brooklyn) and the New Jersey
counties of Union and Middlesex. The telephone number at
Northfield Banks home office is
(718) 448-1000.
Northfield Banks principal business consists of gathering
deposits, and to a lesser extent, borrowing funds, and using
such funds to originate multifamily real estate loans and
commercial real estate loans, purchase investment securities
including mortgage-backed securities and corporate bonds, as
well as deposit funds in other financial institutions.
Northfield Bank also offers construction and land loans,
commercial and industrial loans, one- to four-family residential
mortgage loans, and home equity loans and lines of credit.
Northfield Bank offers a variety of deposit accounts, including
certificates of deposit, passbook, statement, and money market
savings accounts, transaction deposit accounts (Negotiable
Orders of Withdrawal (NOW) accounts and non-interest bearing
demand accounts), individual retirement accounts, and to a
lesser extent when it is deemed cost effective, brokered
deposits. Deposits are Northfield Banks primary source of
funds for its lending and investing activities. Northfield Bank
also uses borrowed funds as a source of funds, principally from
the securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase
agreements) with third party financial institutions and Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York (FHLB) advances. In addition to
traditional banking services, Northfield Bank offers insurance
products through NSB Insurance Agency, Inc. Northfield Bank owns
100% of NSB Services Corp., which, in turn, owns 100% of the
voting common stock of a real estate investment trust, NSB
Realty Trust, which holds primarily mortgage loans and other
real estate related investments.
Available
Information
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is a public company, and files interim,
quarterly, and annual reports with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. These respective reports are on file and a matter of
public record with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
may be read and copied at the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains an Internet
site that contains reports, proxy and information statements,
and other information regarding issuers that file electronically
with the SEC
(http://www.sec.gov).
2
Our website address is www.eNorthfield.com. Information
on our website should not be considered a part of this annual
report.
Market
Area and Competition
We have been in business for over 123 years, offering a
variety of financial products and services to meet the needs of
the communities we serve. Our retail banking network consists of
multiple delivery channels including full-service banking
offices, automated teller machines, mobile, and telephone and
internet banking capabilities. We consider our competitive
products and pricing, branch network, reputation for superior
customer service and financial strength, as our major strengths
in attracting and retaining customers in our market areas.
We face intense competition in our market areas both in making
loans and attracting deposits. Our market areas have a high
concentration of financial institutions, including large money
center and regional banks, community banks, and credit unions.
We face additional competition for deposits from money market
funds, brokerage firms, mutual funds, and insurance companies.
Some of our competitors offer products and services that we do
not offer, such as trust services and private banking.
Our deposit sources are primarily concentrated in the
communities surrounding our banking offices in the New York
Counties of Richmond (Staten Island) and Kings (Brooklyn), and
Union and Middlesex Counties in New Jersey. As of June 30,
2010 (the latest date for which information is publicly
available), we ranked fifth in deposit market share, with a
10.59% market share in Staten Island, and a 0.16% market share
in Brooklyn, New York. In Middlesex and Union Counties in New
Jersey, as of June 30, 2010, we had a combined market share
of 0.82%.
While the disruption in the financial markets has negatively
impacted the banking industry, it has created other
opportunities for the Bank. With many lenders reducing their
lending, we continued lending to qualified borrowers and
increased the number of new customers and new loans. While our
lending has increased in the current environment, we remain
focused on maintaining our loan underwriting standards. We do
not originate or purchase
sub-prime
loans, negative amortization loans or option ARM loans. The slow
recovery of the economy could make it more difficult in the
future to maintain the loan growth we experienced during 2010.
Lending
Activities
Our principal lending activity is the origination of multifamily
real estate loans and, to a lesser extent, commercial real
estate loans. We also originate one- to four-family residential
real estate loans, construction and land loans, commercial and
industrial loans, and home equity loans and lines of credit. In
October 2009, we began to offer loans to finance premiums on
insurance policies, including commercial property and casualty
insurance, and professional liability insurance.
Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales, Participations, and
Servicing. All loans we originate for our
portfolio are underwritten pursuant to our policies and
procedures. In addition, all loans we originate under an
origination assistance agreement with PHH Mortgage (PHH),
conform to secondary market underwriting standards, whereby PHH
processes and underwrites one- to four-family residential real
estate loans, we fund the loans at origination, and elect to
either portfolio the loan or sell it to PHH. Prior to entering
into the origination assistance agreement with PHH in 2010, the
Bank was a participating seller/servicer with Freddie Mac, and
generally underwrote its one- to four-family residential real
estate loans to conform with Freddie Mac standards. We may,
based on proper approvals, approve loans with exceptions to our
policies and procedures. We originate both adjustable-rate and
fixed-rate loans. Our ability to originate fixed- or
adjustable-rate loans is dependent on the relative customer
demand for such loans, which is affected by various factors
including current market interest rates as well as anticipated
future market interest rates. Our loan origination and sales
activity may be adversely affected by a rising interest rate
environment that typically results in decreased loan demand. All
of our one- to four-family residential real estate loans are now
generated through the origination assistance agreement we have
in place with PHH. Our home equity loans and lines of credit
typically are generated through direct mail advertisements,
newspaper advertisements, and referrals from
3
branch personnel. A significant portion of our commercial real
estate loans and multifamily real estate loans are generated by
referrals from loan brokers, accountants, and other professional
contacts.
We generally retain in our portfolio all adjustable-rate loans
we originate, as well as shorter-term, fixed-rate residential
loans (terms of 10 years or less). Loans we sell consist
primarily of conforming, longer-term, fixed-rate residential
loans. We sold $5.7 million of one- to four-family
residential real estate loans (generally fixed-rate loans, with
terms of 15 years or longer) during the year ended
December 31, 2010, and had $1.2 million of loans
held-for-sale
at December 31, 2010.
We sell our loans without recourse, except for standard
representations and warranties provided in secondary market
transactions. Currently, we do not retain any servicing rights
on one- to four-family residential real estate loans we sell. At
December 31, 2010, we were servicing loans owned by others
which consisted of $52.1 million of one- to four-family
residential real estate loans. Historically, the origination of
loans held for sale and related servicing activity has not been
material to our operations. Loan servicing includes collecting
and remitting loan payments, accounting for principal and
interest, contacting delinquent borrowers, supervising
foreclosures and property dispositions in the event of
unremediated defaults, making certain insurance and tax payments
on behalf of the borrowers and generally administering the
loans. We retain a portion of the interest paid by the borrower
on the loans we service as consideration for our servicing
activities.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company purchased
approximately $35.4 million in insurance premium loans, and
began offering these loans.
Loan Approval Procedures and
Authority. Northfield Banks lending
activities follow written, non-discriminatory underwriting
standards established by the Banks board of directors. The
loan approval process is intended to assess the borrowers
ability to repay the loan and value of the collateral that will
secure the loan, if any. To assess the borrowers ability
to repay, we review the borrowers employment and credit
history, and information on the historical and projected income
and expenses of the borrower.
In underwriting a loan secured by real property, we require an
appraisal of the property by an independent licensed appraiser
approved by the Banks board of directors. The appraisals
of multifamily, mixed use, and commercial real estate properties
are also reviewed by an independent third party hired by the
Company. We review and inspect properties before disbursement of
funds during the term of a construction loan. Generally,
management obtains updated appraisals when a loan is deemed
impaired. These appraisals may be more limited than those
prepared for the underwriting of a new loan. In addition, when
the Company acquires other real estate owned, it generally
obtains a current appraisal to substantiate the net carrying
value of the asset.
The board of directors maintains a loan committee consisting of
five bank directors to periodically review and recommend for
approval the Companys policies related to lending
(collectively, the loan policies) as prepared by
management; approve or reject loan applicants meeting certain
criteria; monitor loan quality including concentrations, and
certain other aspects of the lending functions of the Company,
as applicable. Northfield Banks lending officers have
individual lending authority that is approved by the board of
directors.
4
Loan Portfolio Composition. The following
table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio, by type
of loan at the dates indicated, excluding loans held for sale of
$1.2 million, $0, $0, $270,000, and $125,000 at
December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
339,321
|
|
|
|
41.04
|
%
|
|
$
|
327,802
|
|
|
|
44.99
|
%
|
|
$
|
289,123
|
|
|
|
49.05
|
%
|
|
$
|
243,902
|
|
|
|
57.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
207,680
|
|
|
|
50.75
|
%
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
78,032
|
|
|
|
9.44
|
|
|
|
90,898
|
|
|
|
12.48
|
|
|
|
103,128
|
|
|
|
17.49
|
|
|
|
95,246
|
|
|
|
22.45
|
|
|
|
107,572
|
|
|
|
26.29
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
35,054
|
|
|
|
4.24
|
|
|
|
44,548
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
|
|
52,158
|
|
|
|
8.85
|
|
|
|
44,850
|
|
|
|
10.57
|
|
|
|
52,124
|
|
|
|
12.74
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
283,588
|
|
|
|
34.30
|
|
|
|
178,401
|
|
|
|
24.48
|
|
|
|
108,534
|
|
|
|
18.41
|
|
|
|
14,164
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
|
13,276
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
28,125
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
26,118
|
|
|
|
3.58
|
|
|
|
24,182
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
12,797
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
|
|
13,922
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
17,020
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
|
|
|
19,252
|
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
11,025
|
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
11,397
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
11,022
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
|
Insurance premium loans
|
|
|
44,517
|
|
|
|
5.39
|
|
|
|
40,382
|
|
|
|
5.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
3,597
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
826,719
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
728,700
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
589,489
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
424,198
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
409,193
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan costs (fees), net
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(21,819
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,414
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,778
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,636
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,030
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
held-for-investment
|
|
$
|
805,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
713,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
581,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
418,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
404,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Portfolio Maturities. The following table
summarizes the scheduled repayments of our loan portfolio at
December 31, 2010. Demand loans (loans having no stated
repayment schedule or maturity) and overdraft loans are reported
as being due in the year ending December 31, 2011.
Maturities are based on the final contractual payment date and
do not reflect the effect of prepayments and scheduled principal
amortization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate
|
|
|
One- to Four-Family Residential
|
|
|
Construction and Land
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Due during the years ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
11,132
|
|
|
|
6.38
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,773
|
|
|
|
6.99
|
%
|
|
$
|
24,679
|
|
|
|
6.39
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,619
|
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
2012
|
|
|
8,425
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
5.83
|
|
|
|
1,916
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
6.06
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,588
|
|
|
|
6.47
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
5.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,846
|
|
|
|
6.58
|
|
2014 to 2015
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
7.10
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
6.02
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
2,392
|
|
|
|
6.42
|
|
2016 to 2020
|
|
|
8,795
|
|
|
|
6.29
|
|
|
|
17,838
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
7.75
|
|
|
|
6,090
|
|
|
|
6.67
|
|
2021 to 2025
|
|
|
30,289
|
|
|
|
6.30
|
|
|
|
7,713
|
|
|
|
5.35
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
13,937
|
|
|
|
6.52
|
|
2026 and beyond
|
|
|
276,130
|
|
|
|
6.41
|
|
|
|
48,032
|
|
|
|
5.67
|
|
|
|
7,713
|
|
|
|
5.66
|
|
|
|
253,422
|
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
339,321
|
|
|
|
6.38
|
%
|
|
$
|
78,032
|
|
|
|
5.58
|
%
|
|
$
|
35,054
|
|
|
|
6.26
|
%
|
|
$
|
283,588
|
|
|
|
5.93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity and Lines of Credit
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
Insurance Premium
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Due during the years ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
4.94
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,155
|
|
|
|
6.29
|
%
|
|
$
|
43,521
|
|
|
|
6.54
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
%
|
|
$
|
94,953
|
|
|
|
6.38
|
%
|
2012
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
6.76
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
5.72
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
5.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,781
|
|
|
|
5.81
|
|
2013
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
5.55
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
4.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,643
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
|
2014 to 2015
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
|
6.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,882
|
|
|
|
6.29
|
|
2016 to 2020
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
5.56
|
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
|
|
7.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,763
|
|
|
|
5.87
|
|
2021 to 2025
|
|
|
6,956
|
|
|
|
5.46
|
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
|
|
7.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,384
|
|
|
|
6.22
|
|
2026 and beyond
|
|
|
14,016
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
599,313
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
28,125
|
|
|
|
5.10
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,020
|
|
|
|
6.68
|
%
|
|
$
|
44,517
|
|
|
|
6.51
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
%
|
|
$
|
826,719
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has a total of $599.3 million in loans due to
mature in 2026 and beyond, of which $30.8 million, or
5.14%, are fixed rate loans.
The following table sets forth the scheduled repayments of
fixed- and adjustable-rate loans at December 31, 2010, that
are contractually due after December 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due After December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
Adjustable Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
24,578
|
|
|
$
|
303,611
|
|
|
$
|
328,189
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
39,677
|
|
|
|
36,582
|
|
|
|
76,259
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
9,858
|
|
|
|
10,375
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
6,463
|
|
|
|
272,506
|
|
|
|
278,969
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
15,743
|
|
|
|
12,370
|
|
|
|
28,113
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
1,587
|
|
|
|
7,278
|
|
|
|
8,865
|
|
Insurance premium loans
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
89,561
|
|
|
$
|
642,205
|
|
|
$
|
731,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans. Commercial real
estate loans totaled $339.3 million, or 41.04% of our loan
portfolio as of December 31, 2010. Commercial real estate
loans at December 31, 2010 included $28.8 million
secured primarily by hotels and motels, $55.4 million
secured by office buildings, and $60.7 million secured by
manufacturing buildings. Approximately $152.7 million of
our commercial real estate loans are owner-occupied businesses.
At December 31, 2010, our commercial real estate loan
portfolio consisted of 349 loans with an average loan balance of
approximately $972,000, although there are a large number of
loans with balances substantially greater than this average. At
December 31, 2010, our largest commercial real estate loan
had a principal balance of $9.5 million, and was secured by
a hotel. At December 31, 2010, this loan was performing in
accordance with its original contractual terms.
Substantially all of our commercial real estate loans are
secured by properties located in our primary market areas.
6
The table below sets forth the property types collateralizing
our commercial real estate loans as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
$
|
60,685
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
Office Building
|
|
|
55,398
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
Warehousing
|
|
|
32,801
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
Mixed Use
|
|
|
32,505
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
Accomodations
|
|
|
28,793
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
22,945
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
Services
|
|
|
19,139
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Restaurant
|
|
|
12,095
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Schools/Day Care
|
|
|
10,422
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Recreational
|
|
|
4,458
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
2,864
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Other
|
|
|
57,216
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
339,321
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our commercial real estate loans typically amortize over 20- to
25-years
with interest rates that adjust after an initial five- or
10-year
period, and every five years thereafter. Margins generally range
from 275 basis points to 350 basis points above the
average yield on United States Treasury securities, adjusted to
a constant maturity of similar term, as published by the Federal
Reserve Board. Variable rate loans originated subsequent to 2008
have generally been indexed to the five year London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR) swaps rate as published in the Federal
Reserve Statistical Release adjusted for a negotiated margin. We
also originate, to a lesser extent, 10- to
15-year
fixed-rate, fully amortizing loans. In general, our commercial
real estate loans have interest rate floors equal to the
interest rate on the date the loan is originated, and generally
have prepayment penalties if the loan is repaid in the first
three to five years.
In the underwriting of commercial real estate loans, we
generally lend up to the lesser of 75% of the propertys
appraised value or purchase price. Certain single use property
types have lower loan to appraised value ratios. We base our
decision to lend primarily on the economic viability of the
property and the creditworthiness of the borrower. In evaluating
a proposed commercial real estate loan, we emphasize the ratio
of the propertys projected net cash flow to the
loans debt service requirement (generally requiring a
minimum ratio of 125%), computed after deduction for a vacancy
factor, where applicable, and property expenses we deem
appropriate. Personal guarantees are usually obtained from
commercial real estate borrowers. We require title insurance,
fire and extended coverage casualty insurance, and, if
appropriate, flood insurance, in order to protect our security
interest in the underlying property. Although a significant
portion of our commercial real estate loans are referred by
brokers, we underwrite all commercial real estate loans in
accordance with our underwriting standards.
Commercial real estate loans generally carry higher interest
rates and have shorter terms than one- to four-family
residential real estate loans. Commercial real estate loans
generally have greater credit risk compared to one- to
four-family residential real estate loans, as they typically
involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers
or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment of
loans secured by income-producing properties typically depends
on the successful operation of the property, as repayment of the
loan generally largely depends on sufficient income from the
property to cover operating expenses and debt service. Changes
in economic conditions that are not in the control of the
borrower or lender may affect the value of the collateral for
the loan or the future cash flow of the property. Additionally,
any decline in real estate values may be more pronounced for
commercial real estate than for residential properties.
7
Multifamily Real Estate Loans. In recent
years, the Company has focused on originating multifamily real
estate loans. Loans secured by multifamily and mixed use
properties totaled approximately $283.6 million, or 34.30%
of our total loan portfolio at December 31, 2010. Mixed use
properties classified as multifamily are defined by the Company
as having more than four residential family units and a business
or businesses. At December 31, 2010, we had 323 multifamily
real estate loans with an average loan balance of approximately
$878,000. At December 31, 2010, our largest multifamily
real estate loan had a principal balance of $7.7 million
and was performing in accordance with its original contractual
terms. Substantially all of our multifamily real estate loans
are secured by properties located in our market areas.
Our multifamily real estate loans typically amortize over 20- to
30-years
with interest rates that adjust after an initial five- or
10-year
period, and every five years thereafter. Margins generally range
from 275 basis points to 350 basis points above the
average yield on United States Treasury securities, adjusted to
a constant maturity of similar term, as published by the Federal
Reserve Board. Variable rate loans originated subsequent to 2008
generally have been indexed to the five year LIBOR swaps rate as
published in the Federal Reserve Statistical Release adjusted
for a negotiated margin. We also originate, to a lesser extent,
10- to
15-year
fixed-rate, fully amortizing loans. In general, our multifamily
real estate loans have interest rate floors equal to the
interest rate on the date the loan is originated, and have
prepayment penalties should the loan be prepaid in the first
three to five years.
In underwriting multifamily real estate loans, we consider a
number of factors, including the projected net cash flow to the
loans debt service requirement (generally requiring a
minimum ratio of 115%), the age and condition of the collateral,
the financial resources and income level of the borrower, and
the borrowers experience in owning or managing similar
properties. Multifamily real estate loans generally are
originated in amounts up to 75% of the appraised value of the
property securing the loan. Due to competitor considerations, we
typically do not obtain personal guarantees from multifamily
real estate borrowers.
Loans secured by multifamily real estate properties generally
have greater credit risk than one- to four-family residential
real estate loans. This increased credit risk is a result of
several factors, including the concentration of principal in a
limited number of loans and borrowers, the effects of general
economic conditions on income producing properties, and the
increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these types of
loans. Furthermore, the repayment of loans secured by
multifamily real estate properties typically depends on the
successful operation of the property. If the cash flow from the
project is reduced, the borrowers ability to repay the
loan may be impaired.
In a ruling that was contrary to a 1996 advisory opinion from
the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal
that owners of housing units who benefited from the receipt of
J-51 tax incentives under the Rent Stabilization Law
are eligible to decontrol apartments, the New York State Court
of Appeals ruled, on October 22, 2009, that residential
housing units located in two major housing complexes in New York
City had been illegally decontrolled by the current and previous
property owners. This ruling may subject other property owners
that have previously or are currently benefiting from a J-51 tax
incentive to litigation, possibly resulting in a significant
reduction to property cash flows. Based on managements
assessment of its multifamily loan portfolio, it believes that
only one loan may be affected by the recent ruling regarding
J-51. The loan has a principal balance of $7.7 million at
December 31, 2010, and is current to its original
contractual terms.
Construction and Land Loans. At
December 31, 2010, construction and land loans totaled
$35.1 million, or 4.24% of total loans receivable. At
December 31, 2010, the additional un-advanced portion of
these construction loans totaled $7.1 million. At
December 31, 2010, we had 33 construction and land loans
with an average loan balance of approximately $1.1 million.
At December 31, 2010, our largest construction and land
loan had a principal balance of $4.7 million and was for
the purpose of refinancing a land loan. This loan is performing
in accordance with its original contractual terms.
Our construction and land loans typically are interest only
loans with interest rates that are tied to a prime rate index as
published by the Wall Street Journal. Margins generally range
from zero basis points to 200 basis points above the prime
rate index. We also originate, to a lesser extent, 10- to
15-year
fixed-rate, fully
8
amortizing land loans. In general, our construction and land
loans have interest rate floors equal to the interest rate on
the date the loan is originated, and we do not typically charge
prepayment penalties.
We grant construction and land loans to experienced developers
for the construction of single-family residences including
condominiums, and commercial properties. Construction and land
loans also are made to individuals for the construction of their
personal residences. Advances on construction loans are made in
accordance with a schedule reflecting the cost of construction,
but are generally limited to a
loan-to-completed-appraised-value
ratio of 70%. Repayment of construction loans on residential
properties normally is expected from the sale of units to
individual purchasers, or in the case of individuals building
their own, with a permanent mortgage. In the case of
income-producing property, repayment usually is expected from
permanent financing upon completion of construction. We
typically offer the permanent mortgage financing on our
construction loans on income-producing properties.
Land loans also help finance the purchase of land intended for
future development, including single-family housing, multifamily
housing, and commercial property. In some cases, we may make an
acquisition loan before the borrower has received approval to
develop the land. In general, the maximum
loan-to-value
ratio for a land acquisition loan is 50% of the appraised value
of the property, and the maximum term of these loans is two
years. Generally, if the maturity of the loan exceeds two years,
the loan must be an amortizing loan.
Construction and land loans generally carry higher interest
rates and have shorter terms than one- to four- family
residential real estate loans. Construction and land loans have
greater credit risk than long-term financing on improved,
owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan
depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the
value of the real estate at completion of construction as
compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of
construction and other assumptions. If the estimate of
construction costs is inaccurate, we may decide to advance
additional funds beyond the amount originally committed in order
to protect the value of the real estate. However, if the
estimated value of the completed project is inaccurate, the
borrower may hold the real estate with a value that is
insufficient to assure full repayment of the construction loan
upon its sale. In the event we make a land acquisition loan on
real estate that is not yet approved for the planned
development, there is a risk that approvals will not be granted
or will be delayed. Construction loans also expose us to a risk
that improvements will not be completed on time in accordance
with specifications and projected costs. In addition, the
ultimate sale or rental of the real estate may not occur as
anticipated and the market value of collateral, when completed,
may be less that the outstanding loans against the real estate.
Substantially all of our construction and land loans are secured
by real estate located in our primary market areas.
Commercial and Industrial Loans. At
December 31, 2010, commercial and industrial loans totaled
$17.0 million, or 2.06% of the total loan portfolio. As of
December 31, 2010, we had 84 commercial and industrial
loans with an average loan balance of approximately $203,000,
although we originate these types of loans in amounts
substantially greater and smaller than this average. At
December 31, 2010, our largest commercial and industrial
loan had a principal balance of $2.9 million and was
performing in accordance with its original contractual terms.
Our commercial and industrial loans typically amortize over
10 years with interest rates that are tied to a prime rate
index as published in the Wall Street Journal. Margins generally
range from zero basis points to 300 basis points above the
prime rate index. We also originate, to a lesser extent,
10 year fixed-rate, fully amortizing loans. In general, our
commercial and industrial loans have interest rate floors equal
to the interest rate on the date the loan is originated and have
prepayment penalties.
We make various types of secured and unsecured commercial and
industrial loans to customers in our market area for the purpose
of working capital and other general business purposes. The
terms of these loans generally range from less than one year to
a maximum of 15 years. The loans either are negotiated on a
fixed-rate basis or carry adjustable interest rates indexed to a
market rate index.
Commercial credit decisions are based on our credit assessment
of the applicant. We evaluate the applicants ability to
repay in accordance with the proposed terms of the loan and
assess the risks involved.
9
Personal guarantees of the principals are typically obtained. In
addition to evaluating the loan applicants financial
statements, we consider the adequacy of the secondary sources of
repayment for the loan, such as pledged collateral and the
financial stability of the guarantors. Credit agency reports of
the guarantors personal credit history supplement our
analysis of the applicants creditworthiness. We also
attempt to confirm with other banks and conduct trade
investigations as part of our credit assessment of the borrower.
Collateral supporting a secured transaction also is analyzed to
determine its marketability.
Commercial and industrial loans generally carry higher interest
rates than one- to four- family residential real estate loans of
like maturity because they have a higher risk of default since
their repayment generally depends on the successful operation of
the borrowers business. Commercial and industrial loans
have greater credit risk than one- to four- family residential
real estate loans.
Insurance premium loans. At December 31,
2010, insurance premium loans totaled $44.5 million, or
5.39% of the total loan portfolio. As of December 31, 2010,
we had 5,479 insurance premium loans with an average loan
balance of approximately $8,000, although we originate these
types of loans in amounts substantially greater and smaller than
this average. At December 31, 2010, our largest insurance
premium loan had a principal balance of $1.4 million and
was performing in accordance with its original contractual terms.
Our insurance premium loans typically amortize over nine to
twelve months at fixed rates and typically require a down
payment of 15 to 20%. These loans are structured (down payment
and repayment term) such that the unpaid loan balance is
generally fully secured by the unearned premiums refundable by
insurance carriers. Insurance premium loan credit decisions
generally are based on our credit assessment of the insurance
carrier, and in some instances, the credit assessment of the
borrower. Because the agent or broker is the primary contact to
the ultimate borrowers who are located nationwide, and because
proceeds and our collateral may be handled by the agent or
brokers during the term of the loan, we may be more susceptible
to third party (i.e., agent or broker) fraud. The Company
performs ongoing credit and other reviews of the agents and
brokers, and performs various internal audit steps to mitigate
against the risk of any fraud.
One- to Four-Family Residential Real Estate
Loans. At December 31, 2010, we had 490 one-
to four-family residential real estate loans outstanding with an
aggregate balance of $78.0 million, or 9.44% of our total
loan portfolio. As of December 31, 2010, the average
balance of one- to four-family residential real estate loans was
approximately $159,000, although we have originated this type of
loan in amounts substantially greater and smaller than this
average. At December 31, 2010, our largest loan of this
type had a principal balance of $2.4 million and was
performing in accordance with its original contractual terms.
We offer first and second residential real estate loans secured
primarily by owner-occupied, one- to four-family residences
through an origination assistance agreement with an independent
lending institution, PHH Mortgage (PHH), whereby PHH processes
and underwrites one- to four-family loans, we fund the loans at
origination, and elect to either portfolio the loan or sell it
to PHH. PHH retains full servicing of all loans, regardless of
our ownership election. Prior to entering into an origination
assistance agreement with PHH in 2010, the Bank was a
participating seller/servicer with Freddie Mac, and generally
underwrote its one- to four-family residential mortgage loans to
conform with Freddie Mac standards.
For all one- to four-family loans originated through the
origination assistance agreement with PHH, upon receipt of a
completed loan application from a prospective borrower:
(1) a credit report is reviewed; (2) income, assets,
indebtedness and certain other information are reviewed;
(3) if necessary, additional financial information is
required of the borrower; and (4) an appraisal of the real
estate intended to secure the proposed loan is ordered by PHH
from an independent appraiser. One to four-family loans sold to
PHH under a Loan and Servicing Rights Purchase and Sale
Agreement totaled $5.7 million during the year ended
December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, the
Banks portfolio of one- to four-family mortgage loans
serviced for others totaled $52.1 million. The Bank does
not retain servicing on loans sold to PHH.
We do not offer interest only mortgage loans on one-
to four-family residential properties, where the borrower pays
interest for an initial period, after which the loan converts to
a fully amortizing loan. We also do not offer loans that provide
for negative amortization of principal, such as Option
ARM loans, where the borrower can pay less than the
interest owed on their loan, resulting in an increased principal
balance during the
10
life of the loan. We do not offer subprime loans
(loans that generally target borrowers with weakened credit
histories typically characterized by payment delinquencies,
previous charge-offs, judgments, bankruptcies, or borrowers with
questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by low credit
scores or high debt-burden ratios).
Home Equity Loans and Lines of Credit. At
December 31, 2010, we had 482 home equity loans and lines
of credit with an aggregate outstanding balance of
$28.1 million, or 3.40% of our total loan portfolio. Of
this total, there were outstanding home equity lines of credit
of $13.5 million, or 1.63% of our total loan portfolio. At
December 31, 2010, the average home equity loans and lines
of credit balance was approximately $58,000, although we
originate these types of loans in amounts substantially greater
and lower than this average. At December 31, 2010, our
largest home equity line of credit outstanding was
$1.5 million and our largest home equity loan was $307,000
and both were performing in accordance with their original
contractual terms.
We offer home equity loans and home equity lines of credit that
are secured by the borrowers primary residence or second
home. Home equity lines of credit are variable rate loans tied
to a prime rate index as published in the Wall Street Journal
adjusted for a margin, and have a maximum term of 20 years
during which time the borrower is required to make principal
payments based on a
20-year
amortization. Home equity lines generally have interest rate
floors and ceilings. The borrower is permitted to draw against
the line during the entire term. Our home equity loans typically
are fully amortizing with fixed terms to 20 years. Home
equity loans and lines of credit generally are underwritten with
the same criteria we use to underwrite fixed-rate, one- to
four-family residential real estate loans. Home equity loans and
lines of credit may be underwritten with a
loan-to-value
ratio of 80% when combined with the principal balance of the
existing mortgage loan. We appraise (or obtain an automated
valuation model for) the property securing the loan at the time
of the loan application to determine the value of the property.
At the time we close a home equity loan or line of credit, we
record a mortgage to perfect our security interest in the
underlying collateral.
Non-Performing
and Problem Assets
When a loan is over 15 days delinquent, we generally send
the borrower a late charge notice. When the loan is 30 days
past due, we generally mail the borrower a letter reminding the
borrower of the delinquency and, except for loans secured by
one- to four-family residential real estate, we attempt
personal, direct contact with the borrower to determine the
reason for the delinquency, to ensure that the borrower
correctly understands the terms of the loan, and to emphasize
the importance of making payments on or before the due date. If
necessary, additional late charges and delinquency notices are
issued and the account will be monitored periodically. After the
90th day of delinquency, we will send the borrower a final
demand for payment and generally refer the loan to legal counsel
to commence foreclosure and related legal proceedings. Our loan
officers can shorten these time frames in consultation with the
Chief Lending Officer.
Generally, loans are placed on non-accrual status when payment
of principal or interest is 90 days or more delinquent
unless the loan is considered well-secured and in the process of
collection. Loans also are placed on non-accrual status at any
time if the ultimate collection of principal or interest in full
is in doubt. When loans are placed on non-accrual status, unpaid
accrued interest is reversed, and further income is recognized
only to the extent received, and only if the principal balance
is deemed fully collectible. The loan may be returned to accrual
status if both principal and interest payments are brought
current and factors indicating doubtful collection no longer
exist, including performance by the borrower under the loan
terms for a six-month period. Our Chief Lending Officer reports
monitored loans, including all loans rated watch, special
mention, substandard, doubtful or loss, to the loan committee of
the board of directors on a monthly basis.
For economic reasons and to maximize the recovery of loans, the
Company works with borrowers experiencing financial
difficulties, and will consider modifications to a
borrowers existing loan terms and conditions that it would
not otherwise consider, commonly referred to as troubled debt
restructurings (TDR). The Company records an
impairment loss associated with TDRs, if any, based on the
present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the
original loans effective interest rate or the underlying
collateral value, less cost to sell, if the loan is collateral
dependent. Once an obligation has been restructured because of
such credit problems, it continues to be considered restructured
until paid in full or, if the obligation yields a market rate (a
rate equal to or greater than the rate the Company was willing
to accept at the time of the restructuring for
11
a new loan with comparable risk), until the year subsequent to
the year in which the restructuring takes place, provided the
borrower has performed under the modified terms for a six-month
period.
Non-Performing and Restructured Loans. The
table below sets forth the amounts and categories of our
non-performing assets at the dates indicated. At
December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, and 2006, we had
troubled debt restructurings of $20.0 million,
$10.7 million, $1.0 million, $1.3 million, and
$1.7 million, respectively, which are included in the
appropriate categories which appear within non-accrual loans.
Additionally, we had $11.2 million and $7.3 million of
troubled debt restructurings on accrual status at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which do not
appear in the table below. We had no troubled debt
restructurings on accrual status at December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006. Generally, the types of concession that we make
to troubled borrowers include reduction in interest rates and
payment extensions. At December 31, 2010, 69% of TDRs are
commercial real estate loans, 13% are construction loans, 12%
are multifamily loans, and 6% are one- to four-family
residential loans. At December 31, 2010,
$23.5 million, or 75.4% of loans subject to restructuring
agreements were performing in accordance with their restructured
terms. All of the $11.2 million of accruing troubled debt
restructurings, and $12.3 million of the $20.0 million
of non-accruing troubled debt restructurings, were performing in
accordance with their restructured terms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
46,388
|
|
|
$
|
28,802
|
|
|
$
|
4,416
|
|
|
$
|
4,792
|
|
|
$
|
5,167
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
5,122
|
|
|
|
6,843
|
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
3,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
4,863
|
|
|
|
2,118
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
Insurance premium loans
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
|
59,281
|
|
|
|
41,631
|
|
|
|
9,502
|
|
|
|
8,606
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans delinquent 90 days or more and still accruing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
Insurance premium loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans delinquent 90 days or more and still accruing
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
60,890
|
|
|
|
41,822
|
|
|
|
9,639
|
|
|
|
9,834
|
|
|
|
7,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
61,061
|
|
|
$
|
43,760
|
|
|
$
|
10,710
|
|
|
$
|
9,834
|
|
|
$
|
7,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans
held-for-investment,
net
|
|
|
7.36
|
%
|
|
|
5.73
|
%
|
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
|
2.32
|
%
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
2.72
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,247,167
|
|
|
$
|
2,002,274
|
|
|
$
|
1,757,761
|
|
|
$
|
1,386,918
|
|
|
$
|
1,294,747
|
|
Loans
held-for-investment,
net
|
|
|
827,591
|
|
|
|
729,269
|
|
|
|
589,984
|
|
|
|
424,329
|
|
|
|
409,189
|
|
12
The table below sets forth the property types collateralizing
non-accrual commercial real estate loans at December 31,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
$
|
17,341
|
|
|
|
37.4
|
%
|
Office building
|
|
|
8,589
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
Restaurant
|
|
|
4,802
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
3,994
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
Services
|
|
|
3,019
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
Warehouse
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Recreational
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,408
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
46,388
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned. Real estate acquired
by us as a result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of
foreclosure is classified as real estate owned. On the date
property is acquired it is recorded at the lower of cost or
estimated fair value, establishing a new cost basis. Estimated
fair value generally represents the sale price a buyer would be
willing to pay on the basis of current market conditions,
including normal terms from other financial institutions, less
the estimated costs to sell the property. Holding costs and
declines in estimated fair value result in charges to expense
after acquisition. At December 31, 2010, the Company owned
seven properties with a combined carrying value of $171,000. The
properties consist of seven single family and mixed use
properties located in Trenton, New Jersey. The Company currently
is renting certain of the properties and has contracted with a
third party to assist in disposing of all properties.
Potential Problem Loans and Classification of
Assets. The current economic environment
continues to negatively affect certain borrowers. Our loan
officers continue to monitor their loan portfolios, including
evaluation of borrowers business operations, current
financial condition, underlying values of any collateral, and
assessment of their financial prospects in the current and
deteriorating economic environment. Based on this evaluation, we
determine an appropriate strategy to assist borrowers, with the
objective of maximizing the recovery of the related loan
balances.
Our policies, consistent with regulatory guidelines, provide for
the classification of loans and other assets that are considered
to be of lesser quality as substandard, doubtful, or loss
assets. An asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately
protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the
obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets
include those assets characterized by the distinct possibility
that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not
corrected. Assets classified as doubtful have all of the
weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the
added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection
or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing
facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and
improbable. Assets (or portions of assets) classified as loss
are those considered uncollectible and of such little value that
their continuance as assets is not warranted. Assets that do not
expose us to risk sufficient to warrant classification in one of
the aforementioned categories, but which possess potential
weaknesses that deserve our close attention, are designated as
special mention. On the basis of our review of our assets at
December 31, 2010, classified assets (which are not
reported as non-performing assets in the preceding table)
consisted of substandard assets of $29.6 million and no
doubtful or loss assets. We also had $10.9 million of
assets designated as special mention.
Our determination as to the classification of our assets (and
the amount of our loss allowances) will be subject to review by
our principal federal regulator, the Office of Thrift
Supervision, which can require that we adjust our classification
and related loss allowances. We regularly review our asset
portfolio to determine whether any assets require classification
in accordance with applicable regulations.
13
Allowance
for Loan Losses
We provide for loan losses based on the consistent application
of our documented allowance for loan loss methodology. Loan
losses are charged to the allowance for loans losses and
recoveries are credited to it. Additions to the allowance for
loan losses are provided by charges against income based on
various factors which, in our judgment, deserve current
recognition in estimating probable losses. We regularly review
the loan portfolio and make adjustments for loan losses in order
to maintain the allowance for loan losses in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). The allowance for loan losses consists
primarily of the following two components:
(1) Allowances are established for impaired loans
(generally defined by the company as non-accrual loans with an
outstanding balance of $500,000 or greater). The amount of
impairment provided for as an allowance is represented by the
deficiency, if any, between the present value of expected future
cash flows discounted at the original loans effective
interest rate or the underlying collateral value (less estimated
costs to sell,) if the loan is collateral dependent, and the
carrying value of the loan. Impaired loans that have no
impairment losses are not considered for general valuation
allowances described below.
(2) General allowances are established for loan losses on a
portfolio basis for loans that do not meet the definition of
impaired. The portfolio is grouped into similar risk
characteristics, primarily loan type,
loan-to-value,
if collateral dependent, and internal credit risk rating. We
apply an estimated loss rate to each loan group. The loss rates
applied are based on our cumulative prior two year loss
experience adjusted, as appropriate, for the environmental
factors discussed below. This evaluation is inherently
subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be
susceptible to significant revisions based upon changes in
economic and real estate market conditions. Actual loan losses
may be significantly more than the allowance for loan losses we
have established, which could have a material negative effect on
our financial results.
The adjustments to our loss experience are based on our
evaluation of several environmental factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in local, regional, national, and international economic
and business conditions and developments that affect the
collectibility of our portfolio, including the condition of
various market segments;
|
|
|
|
changes in the nature and volume of our portfolio and in the
terms of our loans;
|
|
|
|
changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending
management and other relevant staff;
|
|
|
|
changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume
of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely
classified or graded loans;
|
|
|
|
changes in the quality of our loan review system;
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of underlying collateral for
collateral-dependent loans;
|
|
|
|
the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and
changes in the level of such concentrations; and
|
|
|
|
the effect of other external factors such as competition and
legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated
credit losses in our existing portfolio.
|
In evaluating the estimated loss factors to be utilized for each
loan group, management also reviews actual loss history over an
extended period of time as reported by the OTS and FDIC for
institutions both nationally and in our market area for periods
that are believed to have been under similar economic conditions.
We evaluate the allowance for loan losses based on the combined
total of the impaired and general components. Generally when the
loan portfolio increases, absent other factors, our allowance
for loan loss methodology results in a higher dollar amount of
estimated probable losses than would be the case without the
increase. Generally when the loan portfolio decreases, absent
other factors, our allowance for loan loss
14
methodology results in a lower dollar amount of estimated
probable losses than would be the case without the decrease.
Each quarter we evaluate the allowance for loan losses and
adjust the allowance as appropriate through a provision or
recovery for loan losses. While we use the best information
available to make evaluations, future adjustments to the
allowance may be necessary if conditions differ substantially
from the information used in making the evaluations. In
addition, as an integral part of their examination process, the
Office of Thrift Supervision will periodically review the
allowance for loan losses. The Office of Thrift Supervision may
require us to adjust the allowance based on their analysis of
information available to them at the time of their examination.
Our last regulatory examination was as of September 30,
2010.
The Company also maintains an unallocated component related to
the general loss allocation. Management does not target a
specific unallocated percentage of the total general allocation,
or total allowance for loan losses. The primary purpose of the
unallocated component is to account for the inherent imprecision
of the loss estimation process related primarily to periodic
updating of appraisals on impaired loans, as well as periodic
updating of commercial loan credit risk ratings by loan officers
and the Companys internal credit audit process. Generally,
management will establish higher levels of unallocated reserves
between independent credit audits, and between appraisal reviews
for larger impaired loans. Adjustments to the provision for
loans due to the receipt of updated appraisals is mitigated by
managements quarterly review of real estate market index
changes, and reviews of property valuation trends noted in
current appraisals being received on other impaired and
unimpaired loans. These changes in indicators of value are
applied to impaired loans that are awaiting updated appraisals.
The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for
loan losses for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
15,414
|
|
|
$
|
8,778
|
|
|
$
|
5,636
|
|
|
$
|
5,030
|
|
|
$
|
4,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
(987
|
)
|
|
|
(1,348
|
)
|
|
|
(1,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(686
|
)
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
(2,132
|
)
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premium finance loans
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(814
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
|
(3,699
|
)
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premium finance loans
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
|
|
|
(3,679
|
)
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
10,084
|
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
21,819
|
|
|
$
|
15,414
|
|
|
$
|
8,778
|
|
|
$
|
5,636
|
|
|
$
|
5,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding
|
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
|
|
0.37
|
%
|
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans at end of year
|
|
|
35.83
|
|
|
|
36.86
|
|
|
|
91.07
|
|
|
|
57.31
|
|
|
|
70.70
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans held-for- investment, net at
end of year
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
|
|
1.23
|
|
15
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The
following tables set forth the allowance for loan losses
allocated by loan category and the percent of loans in each
category to total loans at the dates indicated. The allowance
for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily
indicative of future losses in any particular category and does
not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other
categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Loans in Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each
|
|
|
|
Loan
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
41.04
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,403
|
|
|
|
44.99
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,176
|
|
|
|
49.05
|
%
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
9.44
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
12.48
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
17.49
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
1,855
|
|
|
|
4.24
|
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
|
|
8.85
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
5,137
|
|
|
|
34.30
|
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
24.48
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
18.41
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
3.58
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
Insurance premium loans
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
5.39
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
5.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated allowance
|
|
|
21,316
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
15,063
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
8,778
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Each Category to
|
|
|
|
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
3,456
|
|
|
|
57.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
50.75
|
%
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
22.45
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
26.29
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
10.57
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
12.74
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
|
Insurance premium finance loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated allowance
|
|
|
5,636
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
4,988
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
We conduct investment transactions in accordance with our board
approved investment policy which is reviewed at least annually
by the risk committee, and any changes to the policy are subject
to ratification by the full board of directors. This policy
dictates that investment decisions give consideration to the
safety of the investment, liquidity requirements, potential
returns, the ability to provide collateral for pledging
requirements, and consistency with our interest rate risk
management strategy. Our Treasurer executes our securities
portfolio transactions, within policy requirements, with the
approval of either the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief
Financial Officer. NSB Services Corp.s and NSB Realty
Trusts Investment Officers execute security portfolio
16
transactions in accordance with investment policies that
substantially mirror the Banks investment policy. All
purchase and sale transactions are reviewed by the risk
committee at least quarterly.
Our current investment policy permits investments in
mortgage-backed securities, including pass-through securities
and real estate mortgage investment conduits
(REMICs). The investment policy also permits, with
certain limitations, investments in debt securities issued by
the United States Government, agencies of the United States
Government or United States Government-sponsored enterprises
(GSEs), asset-backed securities, money market mutual funds,
federal funds, investment grade corporate bonds, reverse
repurchase agreements, and certificates of deposit.
The Banks investment policy does not permit investment in
municipal bonds, preferred and common stock of other entities
including U.S. Government sponsored enterprises or equity
securities other than our required investment in the common
stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, or as permitted
for community reinvestment purposes or for the purposes of
funding the Banks deferred compensation plan. Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. may invest in equity securities of other financial
institutions up to certain limitations. As of December 31,
2010, we held no asset-backed securities other than
mortgage-backed securities. Our board of directors may change
these limitations in the future.
Our current investment policy does not permit hedging through
the use of such instruments as financial futures, interest rate
options, and swaps.
At the time of purchase, the Company must designate a security
as either
held-to-maturity,
available-for-sale,
or trading, based upon our ability and intent to hold such
securities. Trading securities and securities
available-for-sale
are reported at estimated fair value, and securities
held-to-maturity
are reported at amortized cost. A periodic review and evaluation
of the
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
securities portfolios is conducted to determine if the estimated
fair value of any security has declined below its carrying value
and whether such impairment is
other-than-temporary.
If such impairment is deemed to be
other-than-temporary,
the security is written down to a new cost basis and the
resulting loss is charged against earnings. The estimated fair
values of our securities are obtained from an independent
nationally recognized pricing service (see Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Critical
Accounting Policies for further discussion). At
December 31, 2010, our investment portfolio consisted
primarily of mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by GSEs and
to a lesser extent private label mortgage-backed securities,
mutual funds, corporate securities, and agency bonds. The market
for these securities primarily consists of other financial
institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment
trusts, and mutual funds.
We purchase mortgage-backed securities insued or guaranteed
primarily by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae, and to a
lesser extent, we acquire securities issued by private companies
(private label). We invest in mortgage-backed securities to
achieve positive interest rate spreads with minimal
administrative expense, and to lower our credit risk as a result
of the guarantees provided by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie
Mae. In September 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency
placed Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into conservatorship. The
U.S. Treasury Department has established financing
agreements to ensure that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae meet their
obligations to holders of mortgage-backed securities that they
have issued or guaranteed.
Mortgage-backed securities are securities sold in the secondary
market that are collateralized by pools of mortgages. Certain
types of mortgage-backed securities are commonly referred to as
pass-through certificates because the principal and
interest of the underlying loans is passed through
pro rata to investors, net of certain costs, including servicing
and guarantee fees, in proportion to an investors
ownership in the entire pool. The issuers of such securities
pool mortgages and resell the participation interests in the
form of securities to investors. The interest rate of the
security is lower than the interest rates of the underlying
loans to allow for payment of servicing and guaranty fees.
Ginnie Mae, a United States Government agency, and GSEs, such as
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, may guarantee the payments or
guarantee the timely payment of principal and interest to
investors.
17
Mortgage-backed securities are more liquid than individual
mortgage loans since there is a more active market for such
securities. In addition, mortgage-backed securities may be used
to collateralize our specific liabilities and obligations.
Investments in mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed
by GSEs involve a risk that actual payments will be greater or
less than estimated at the time of purchase, which may require
adjustments to the amortization of any premium or accretion of
any discount relating to such interests, thereby affecting the
net yield on our securities. We periodically review current
prepayment speeds to determine whether prepayment estimates
require modification that could cause adjustment of amortization
or accretion.
REMICs are a type of mortgage-backed security issued by
special-purpose entities that aggregate pools of mortgages and
mortgage-backed securities and create different classes of
securities with varying maturities and amortization schedules,
as well as a residual interest, with each class possessing
different risk characteristics. The cash flows from the
underlying collateral are generally divided into
tranches or classes that have descending priorities
with respect to the distribution of principal and interest cash
flows, while cash flows on pass-through mortgage-backed
securities are distributed pro rata to all security holders.
The timely payment of principal and interest on these REMICs is
generally supported (credit enhanced) in varying degrees by
either insurance issued by a financial guarantee insurer,
letters of credit, over collateralization, or subordination
techniques. Substantially all of these securities are rated
AAA by Standard & Poors or
Moodys at the time of purchase. Privately issued REMICs
and pass-throughs can be subject to certain credit-related risks
normally not associated with U.S. Government agency and
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed
securities. The loss protection generally provided by the
various forms of credit enhancements is limited, and losses in
excess of certain levels are not protected. Furthermore, the
credit enhancement itself may be subject to the creditworthiness
of the credit enhancer. Thus, in the event a credit enhancer
does not fulfill its obligations, the holder could be subject to
risk of loss similar to a purchaser of a whole loan pool.
Management believes that the credit enhancements are adequate to
protect us from material losses on our privately issued
mortgage-backed securities.
At December 31, 2010, our corporate bond portfolio
consisted of investment grade securities with maturities
generally shorter than three years. Our investment policy
provides that we may invest up to 15% of our tier-one risk-based
capital in corporate bonds from individual issuers which, at the
time of purchase, are within the three highest investment-grade
ratings from Standard & Poors or Moodys.
The maturity of these bonds may not exceed 10 years, and
there is no aggregate limit for this security type. Corporate
bonds from individual issuers with investment-grade ratings, at
the time of purchase, below the top three ratings are limited to
the lesser of 1% of our total assets or 15% of our tier-one
risk-based capital and must have a maturity of less than one
year. Aggregate holdings of this security type cannot exceed 5%
of our total assets. Bonds that subsequently experience a
decline in credit rating below investment grade are monitored at
least monthly.
18
The following table sets forth the amortized cost and estimated
fair value of our
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
securities portfolios (excluding Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York common stock) at the dates indicated. As of
December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, we also had a trading
portfolio with a market value of $4.1 million,
$3.4 million, and $2.5 million, respectively,
consisting of mutual funds quoted in actively traded markets.
These securities are utilized to fund non-qualified deferred
compensation obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
$
|
342,316
|
|
|
$
|
355,795
|
|
|
$
|
404,128
|
|
|
$
|
418,060
|
|
|
$
|
532,870
|
|
|
$
|
546,244
|
|
Non-GSEs
|
|
|
27,801
|
|
|
|
27,878
|
|
|
|
65,363
|
|
|
|
62,466
|
|
|
|
65,040
|
|
|
|
55,778
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
|
622,582
|
|
|
|
622,077
|
|
|
|
344,150
|
|
|
|
349,088
|
|
|
|
242,557
|
|
|
|
245,492
|
|
Non-GSEs
|
|
|
65,766
|
|
|
|
69,389
|
|
|
|
111,756
|
|
|
|
114,194
|
|
|
|
90,446
|
|
|
|
83,695
|
|
Equity investments(1)
|
|
|
12,437
|
|
|
|
12,353
|
|
|
|
21,820
|
|
|
|
21,872
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
GSE bonds bonds
|
|
|
34,988
|
|
|
|
35,033
|
|
|
|
28,994
|
|
|
|
28,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
119,765
|
|
|
|
121,788
|
|
|
|
134,595
|
|
|
|
137,140
|
|
|
|
17,319
|
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
1,225,655
|
|
|
$
|
1,244,313
|
|
|
$
|
1,110,806
|
|
|
$
|
1,131,803
|
|
|
$
|
957,257
|
|
|
$
|
957,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
$
|
899
|
|
|
$
|
874
|
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
|
$
|
6,132
|
|
|
$
|
6,273
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
|
4,206
|
|
|
|
4,374
|
|
|
|
5,866
|
|
|
|
6,029
|
|
|
|
8,347
|
|
|
|
8,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
5,060
|
|
|
$
|
5,273
|
|
|
$
|
6,740
|
|
|
$
|
6,930
|
|
|
$
|
14,479
|
|
|
$
|
14,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the amortized cost and estimated
fair value of securities as of December 31, 2010, that
exceeded 10% of our stockholders equity as of that date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freddie Mac
|
|
$
|
556,982
|
|
|
$
|
559,951
|
|
Fannie Mae
|
|
$
|
396,159
|
|
|
$
|
405,929
|
|
JP Morgan Chase
|
|
$
|
45,317
|
|
|
$
|
47,436
|
|
19
Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The
composition and maturities of the investment securities
portfolio at December 31, 2009, are summarized in the
following table. Maturities are based on the final contractual
payment dates, and do not reflect the effect of scheduled
principal repayments, prepayments, or early redemptions that may
occur. All of our securities at December 31, 20110, were
taxable securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year or Less
|
|
|
More than One Year through Five Years
|
|
|
More than Five Years through Ten Years
|
|
|
More than Ten Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
86,561
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
$
|
155,039
|
|
|
|
4.47
|
%
|
|
$
|
100,716
|
|
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
|
$
|
342,316
|
|
|
$
|
355,795
|
|
|
|
4.21
|
%
|
Non-GSEs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
16,938
|
|
|
|
5.05
|
%
|
|
|
10,863
|
|
|
|
5.53
|
%
|
|
|
27,801
|
|
|
|
27,878
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
%
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
|
2,494
|
|
|
|
3.67
|
%
|
|
|
133,392
|
|
|
|
1.55
|
%
|
|
|
191,507
|
|
|
|
2.17
|
%
|
|
|
295,189
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
%
|
|
|
622,582
|
|
|
|
622,077
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
Non-GSEs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
61,992
|
|
|
|
4.97
|
%
|
|
|
3,774
|
|
|
|
3.05
|
%
|
|
|
65,766
|
|
|
|
69,389
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
Equity investments
|
|
|
12,437
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
12,437
|
|
|
|
12,353
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
%
|
GSE bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
34,988
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
34,988
|
|
|
|
35,033
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
%
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
64,393
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
%
|
|
|
55,372
|
|
|
|
2.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
119,765
|
|
|
|
121,788
|
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
79,324
|
|
|
|
2.91
|
%
|
|
$
|
310,313
|
|
|
|
2.59
|
%
|
|
$
|
425,476
|
|
|
|
3.53
|
%
|
|
$
|
410,542
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,225,655
|
|
|
$
|
1,244,313
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
%
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
$
|
899
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
%
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
4,206
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
%
|
|
|
4,206
|
|
|
|
4,374
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,060
|
|
|
|
4.06
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,060
|
|
|
$
|
5,273
|
|
|
|
4.06
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources
of Funds
General. Deposits traditionally have been our
primary source of funds for our securities and lending
activities. We also borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
New York and other financial institutions to supplement cash
flow needs, to lengthen the maturities of liabilities for
interest rate risk management purposes, and to manage our cost
of funds. Our additional sources of funds are the proceeds of
loan sales, scheduled loan payments, maturing investments, loan
prepayments, and retained income on other earning assets.
Deposits. We accept deposits primarily from
the areas in which our offices are located. We rely on our
convenient locations, customer service, and competitive products
and pricing to attract and retain deposits. We offer a variety
of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and terms.
Our deposit accounts consist of transaction accounts (NOW and
non-interest bearing checking accounts), savings accounts (money
market, passbook, and statement savings), and certificates of
deposit, including individual retirement accounts. We accept
brokered deposits on a limited basis, when it is deemed cost
effective. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had brokered
certificates of deposits totaling $68.4 million and
$54.8 million, respectively.
Interest rates offered generally are established weekly, while
maturity terms, service fees, and withdrawal penalties are
reviewed on a periodic basis. Deposit rates and terms are based
primarily on current operating strategies and market interest
rates, liquidity requirements, and our deposit growth goals.
At December 31, 2010, we had a total of $553.0 million
in certificates of deposit, of which $474.0 million had
remaining maturities of one year or less. Based on our
experience and current pricing strategy, we believe we will
retain a significant portion of these accounts at maturity.
20
The following tables set forth the distribution of our average
total deposit accounts, by account type, for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand
|
|
$
|
114,450
|
|
|
|
8.28
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
99,950
|
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
NOW
|
|
|
71,130
|
|
|
|
5.15
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
|
|
51,336
|
|
|
|
4.36
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
243,612
|
|
|
|
17.64
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
157,620
|
|
|
|
13.40
|
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
361,592
|
|
|
|
26.18
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
357,938
|
|
|
|
30.43
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
590,445
|
|
|
|
42.75
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
509,610
|
|
|
|
43.31
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
1,381,229
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,176,454
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand
|
|
$
|
94,499
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
NOW
|
|
|
63,512
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
64,444
|
|
|
|
7.10
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
317,426
|
|
|
|
34.97
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
367,806
|
|
|
|
40.52
|
|
|
|
3.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
907,687
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
2.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, the aggregate amount of our
outstanding certificates of deposit in amounts greater than or
equal to $100,000 was $280.8 million. The following table
sets forth the maturity of these certificates at
December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
94,776
|
|
Over three months through six months
|
|
|
66,510
|
|
Over six months through one year
|
|
|
77,398
|
|
Over one year to three years
|
|
|
6,818
|
|
Over three years
|
|
|
35,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
280,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings. Our borrowings consist primarily
of securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase
agreements) with third party financial institutions, as well as
advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and the
Federal Reserve Bank. As of December 31, 2010, our
repurchase agreements totaled $243.0 million, or 13.1% of
total liabilities, capitalized lease obligations totaled
$1.9 million, or 0.10% of total liabilities, and our
Federal Home Loan Bank advances totaled $146.3 million, or
7.9% of total liabilities. At December 31, 2010, the
Company has the ability to obtain additional funding from the
FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank discount window of approximately
$398.2 million, utilizing unencumbered securities of
$442.4 million at December 31, 2010. Repurchase
agreements are primarily secured by mortgage-backed securities.
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York are secured
by our investment in
21
the common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York as
well as by pledged mortgage-backed securities.
The following table sets forth information concerning balances
and interest rates on our borrowings at and for the years
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
391,237
|
|
|
$
|
279,424
|
|
|
$
|
332,084
|
|
Average balance during year
|
|
$
|
330,693
|
|
|
$
|
297,365
|
|
|
$
|
277,227
|
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end
|
|
$
|
391,237
|
|
|
$
|
345,506
|
|
|
$
|
382,107
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of year
|
|
|
2.97
|
%
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
|
|
3.70
|
%
|
Average interest rate during year
|
|
|
3.28
|
%
|
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
|
|
3.51
|
%
|
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, we had 225 full-time
employees and 36 part-time employees. Our employees are not
represented by any collective bargaining group. Management
believes that we have a good working relationship with our
employees.
Subsidiary
Activities
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. owns 100% of Northfield Investments,
Inc., an inactive New Jersey investment company, and 100% of
Northfield Bank. Northfield Bank owns 100% of NSB Services
Corp., a Delaware corporation, which in turn owns 100% of the
voting common stock of NSB Realty Trust. NSB Realty Trust is a
Maryland real estate investment trust that holds mortgage loans,
mortgage-backed securities and other investments. These entities
enable us to segregate certain assets for management purposes,
and promote our ability to raise regulatory capital in the
future through the sale of preferred stock or other
capital-enhancing securities or borrow against assets or stock
of these entities for liquidity purposes. At December 31,
2010, Northfield Banks investment in NSB Services Corp.
was $586.4 million, and NSB Services Corp. had assets of
$586.6 million and liabilities of $132,000 at that date. At
December 31, 2010, NSB Services Corp.s investment in
NSB Realty Trust was $587.7 million, and NSB Realty Trust
had $587.7 million in assets, and liabilities of $14,000 at
that date. NSB Insurance Agency, Inc. is a New York corporation
that receives nominal commissions from the sale of life
insurance by employees of Northfield Bank. At December 31,
2010, Northfield Banks investment in NSB Insurance Agency
was $1,000.
SUPERVISION
AND REGULATION
General
Northfield Bank is regulated and supervised by the Office of
Thrift Supervision and also is subject to examination by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. This regulation and
supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities
in which an institution may engage and is intended primarily for
the protection of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporations deposit insurance fund and the
institutions depositors. Under this system of federal
regulation, financial institutions are periodically examined to
ensure that they satisfy applicable standards with respect to
capital adequacy, asset quality, management, earnings,
liquidity, and sensitivity to market risk. Following completion
of its examination, the federal agency critiques the
institutions operations and assigns its rating (known as
an institutions CAMELS rating). In addition, the Office of
Thrift Supervision formally evaluated risk and risk management
practices of the institution. Under federal law, an institution
may not disclose its CAMELS rating to the public. Northfield
Bank also is regulated to a lesser extent by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, governing reserves to
be maintained against deposits and other matters. The Office of
Thrift Supervision periodically examines Northfield Bank and
prepares reports of its findings for the consideration of its
board of directors. Northfield Banks relationship with its
depositors and borrowers also is regulated to a great extent by
federal law and, to
22
a much lesser extent, state law, especially in matters
concerning the ownership of deposit accounts and the form and
content of Northfield Banks loan documents.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bancorp, MHC, are
savings and loan holding companies, and are required to file
certain reports with, be examined by, and otherwise comply with
the rules and regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. also is subject to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
federal securities laws.
Any change in the laws or regulations applicable to Northfield
Bank, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. or Northfield Bancorp, MHC,
whether by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office
of Thrift Supervision, or Congress, could have a material
adverse effect on their operations.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of
2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act) made extensive
changes in the regulation of federal savings banks such as
Northfield Bank. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Office of Thrift
Supervision will be eliminated. Responsibility for the
supervision and regulation of federal savings banks will be
transferred to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency,
which is the agency that is currently primarily responsible for
the regulation and supervision of national banks. The Office of
the Comptroller of the Currency will assume responsibility for
implementing and enforcing many of the laws and regulations
applicable to federal savings banks. The transfer of regulatory
functions will take place over a transition period of up to one
year from the Dodd-Frank Act enactment date of July 21,
2010, subject to a possible six-month extension. At the same
time, responsibility for the regulation and supervision of
savings and loan holding companies, such as Northfield Bancorp,
MHC and Northfield Bancorp, Inc. will be transferred to the
Federal Reserve Board, which currently supervises bank holding
companies. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act created the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau as an independent bureau of the
Federal Reserve Board. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
will assume responsibility for the implementation of the federal
financial consumer protection and fair lending laws and
regulations, a function currently assigned to prudential
regulators, and will have authority to impose new requirements.
However, institutions of less than $10 billion in assets,
such as Northfield Bank, will continue to be examined for
compliance with consumer protection and fair lending laws and
regulations by, and be subject to the primary enforcement
authority of, their prudential regulator rather than the
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Certain of the regulatory requirements that are or will be
applicable to Northfield Bank, Northfield Bancorp, Inc., and
Northfield Bancorp, MHC are described below. This description of
statutes and regulations is not intended to be a complete
explanation of such statutes and regulations and their effect on
Northfield Bank, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield
Bancorp, MHC and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the actual statutes and regulations.
Federal
Banking Regulation
Business Activities. A federal savings bank
derives its lending and other investment powers from the Home
Owners Loan Act, as amended, and the regulations of the
Office of Thrift Supervision. Under these laws and regulations,
Northfield Bank may invest in mortgage loans secured by one- to
four-residential real estate without limitation as a percentage
of assets, and may invest in non-residential real estate loans
up to 400% of capital in the aggregate, commercial business
loans up to 20% of assets in the aggregate and consumer loans up
to 35% of assets in the aggregate, and in certain types of debt
securities and certain other assets. Northfield Bank also may
establish subsidiaries that may engage in activities not
otherwise permissible for Northfield Bank, including real estate
investment, and securities and insurance brokerage.
Capital Requirements. Office of Thrift
Supervision regulations requires savings banks to meet three
minimum capital standards: a 1.5% tangible capital ratio, a 4%
(core) capital ratio, and an 8% total risk-based capital ratio.
The risk-based capital standard for savings banks requires the
maintenance of total capital (which is defined as core capital
and supplementary capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least
8%. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all
assets, including certain off-balance sheet obligations, are
multiplied by a risk-weight factor assigned by the Office of
Thrift Supervision, based on the risks believed inherent in the
type
23
of asset. Core capital is defined as common stockholders
equity (including retained earnings), certain noncumulative
perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority
interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less
intangibles other than certain mortgage servicing rights and
credit card relationships. The components of supplementary
capital currently include cumulative preferred stock, long-term
perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities,
subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock, the
allowance for loan and lease losses (limited to a maximum of
1.25% of risk-weighted assets) and up to 45% of net unrealized
gains on
available-for-sale
equity securities with readily determinable fair values.
Overall, the amount of supplementary capital included as part of
total capital cannot exceed 100% of core capital. Additionally,
a savings bank that retains credit risk in connection with an
asset sale may be required to maintain additional regulatory
capital because of the possible recourse to the savings bank.
At December 31, 2010, Northfield Banks capital
exceeded all applicable requirements. The Office of Thrift
Supervision currently does not mandate capital standards for
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. or Northfield Bancorp, MHC.
Loans-to-One
Borrower. Generally, a federal savings bank may
not make a loan or extend credit to a single or related group of
borrowers in excess of 15% of unimpaired capital and surplus. An
additional amount may be loaned, equal to 10% of unimpaired
capital and surplus, if the loan is secured by readily
marketable collateral, which generally does not include real
estate. As of December 31, 2010, Northfield Banks
largest lending relationship with a single or related group of
borrowers totaled $17.5 million, which represented 5.6% of
unimpaired capital and surplus. Therefore, Northfield Bank was
in compliance with the
loans-to-one
borrower limitations at December 31, 2010.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. As a federal
savings bank, Northfield Bank must satisfy the qualified thrift
lender, or QTL, test. Under the QTL test, Northfield
Bank must maintain at least 65% of its portfolio
assets in qualified thrift investments
(primarily residential mortgages and related investments,
including mortgage-backed securities) in at least nine months of
the most recent
12-month
period. Portfolio assets generally means total
assets of a savings bank, less the sum of specified liquid
assets up to 20% of total assets, goodwill, and other intangible
assets, and the value of property used in the conduct of the
savings banks business.
A savings bank that fails the qualified thrift lender test is
subject to certain restrictions on operations. The Dodd-Frank
Act made noncompliance with the QTL Test potentially subject to
agency enforcement action for a violation of law. At
December 31, 2010, Northfield Bank maintained approximately
79.6% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments
and, therefore, satisfied the QTL test.
Capital Distributions. Office of Thrift
Supervision regulations govern capital distributions by a
federal savings bank, including cash dividends, stock
repurchases, and other transactions charged to the capital
account. A savings bank must file an application for approval of
a capital distribution if:
|
|
|
|
|
the total capital distributions for the applicable calendar year
exceed the sum of the savings banks net income for that
year to date plus the savings banks retained net income
for the preceding two years;
|
|
|
|
the savings bank would not be at least adequately capitalized
following the distribution;
|
|
|
|
the distribution would violate any applicable statute,
regulation, agreement, or Office of Thrift Supervision-imposed
condition; or
|
|
|
|
the savings bank is not eligible for expedited treatment of its
application or notice filings.
|
Even if an application is not otherwise required, every savings
bank that is a subsidiary of a holding company must file a
notice with the Office of Thrift Supervision at least
30 days before the board of directors declares a dividend
or approves a capital distribution.
The Office of Thrift Supervision may disapprove a notice or
application if:
|
|
|
|
|
the savings bank would be undercapitalized following the
distribution;
|
|
|
|
the proposed capital distribution raises safety and soundness
concerns; or
|
|
|
|
the capital distribution would violate a prohibition contained
in any statute, regulation, or agreement.
|
24
In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act provides that an
insured depository institution shall not make a capital
distribution if, after making the distribution, the institution
would be undercapitalized.
Liquidity. A federal savings bank is required
to maintain a sufficient amount of liquidity to ensure its safe
and sound operation. We seek to maintain a ratio of liquid
assets not subject to pledge as a percentage of deposits and
borrowings not subject to pledge of 35% or greater. At
December 31, 2010, this ratio was 67.9%.
Assessments. The Office of Thrift Supervision
charges assessments to recover the costs of regulating and
supervising savings banks and their affiliates. These
assessments are based on three components: the size of the
savings bank on which the basic assessment is based; the savings
banks supervisory condition, which results in an
additional assessment based on a percentage of the basic
assessment for any savings bank with a composite rating of 3, 4,
or 5 in its most recent safety and soundness examination; and
the complexity of the banks operations. For 2010, the
Companys total assessment was approximately $390,000.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which will assume
the primary regulation of savings banks as part of the
Dodd-Frank Act regulatory restructuring, also supports its
operations through assessments on regulated institutions.
Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending
Laws. All Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
insured institutions have a responsibility under the Community
Reinvestment Act and related regulations of the Office of Thrift
Supervision to help meet the credit needs of their communities,
including low- and moderate-income areas. Further, in connection
with its examination of a federal savings bank, the Office of
Thrift Supervision is required to assess the savings banks
record of compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. In
addition, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing
Act prohibit lenders from discriminating in their lending
practices on the basis of characteristics specified in those
statutes. A savings banks failure to comply with the
provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act could, at a
minimum, result in denial of certain corporate applications such
as branches or mergers, or in restrictions on its activities.
The failure to comply with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and
the Fair Housing Act could result in enforcement actions by the
Office of Thrift Supervision, as well as other federal
regulatory agencies including the Department of Justice.
Northfield Bank received a satisfactory Community Reinvestment
Act rating in its most recent examination conducted by the
Office of Thrift Supervision.
Transactions with Related Parties. A federal
savings banks authority to engage in transactions with its
affiliates is limited by Office of Thrift Supervision
regulations and by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal
Reserve Act and its implementing Regulation W. An affiliate
is a company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with an insured depository institution such as
Northfield Bank. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield
Bancorp, MHC are affiliates of Northfield Bank. In general, loan
transactions between an insured depository institution and its
affiliates are subject to certain quantitative and collateral
requirements. In this regard, transactions between an insured
depository institution and its affiliates are limited to 10% of
the institutions unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus
for transactions with any one affiliate and 20% of unimpaired
capital and unimpaired surplus for transactions in the aggregate
with all affiliates. Collateral in specified amounts ranging
from 100% to 130% of the amount of the transaction must usually
be provided by affiliates in order to receive loans from the
savings bank. In addition, Office of Thrift Supervision
regulations prohibit a savings bank from lending to any of its
affiliates that are engaged in activities that are not
permissible for bank holding companies, and from purchasing the
securities of any affiliate, other than a subsidiary. Finally,
transactions with affiliates must be consistent with safe and
sound banking practices, not involve low-quality assets, and be
on terms that are as favorable to the institution as comparable
transactions with non-affiliates. The Office of Thrift
Supervision requires savings banks to maintain detailed records
of all transactions with affiliates.
Northfield Banks authority to extend credit to its
directors, executive officers, and principal stockholders, as
well as to entities controlled by such persons, is governed by
the requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h)
25
of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O of the Federal
Reserve Board. Among other things, these provisions require that
extensions of credit to insiders:
(i) be made on terms that are substantially the same as,
and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less
stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions
with unaffiliated persons, and that do not involve more than the
normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features
(except for extensions of credit made pursuant to lending
programs are widely available to the employees of the
institution and do not give preference to insiders); and
(ii) not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit
extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate,
which limits are based, in part, on the amount of Northfield
Banks capital.
In addition, extensions of credit in excess of certain limits to
any director, executive officer, or principal stockholder must
be approved by Northfield Banks board of directors.
Section 402 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
prohibits the extension of personal loans to directors and
executive officers of issuers (as defined by in Sarbanes-Oxley).
The prohibition, however, does not apply to any loans made or
maintained by an insured depository institution, such as
Northfield Bank, that is subject to the insider lending
restrictions of the Federal Reserve Act and other applicable
rules and regulations.
Enforcement. The Office of Thrift Supervision
has primary enforcement responsibility over federal savings
banks and has the authority to bring enforcement action against
all institution-affiliated parties, including
stockholders, attorneys, appraisers, and accountants who
knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful actions likely
to have an adverse effect on an insured institution. Formal
enforcement action by the Office of Thrift Supervision may range
from the issuance of a capital directive or cease and desist
order, to removal of officers or directors of the institution
and the appointment of a receiver or conservator. Civil
penalties cover a wide range of violations and actions, and
range up to $25,000 per day, unless a finding of reckless
disregard is made, in which case penalties may be as high as
$1 million per day. The Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation also has the authority to terminate deposit
insurance or to recommend to the Director of the Office of
Thrift Supervision that enforcement action be taken with respect
to a particular savings institution. If action is not taken by
the Director, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has
authority to take actions under specified circumstances.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency will assume the
Office of Thrift Supervisions enforcement authority over
federal savings banks as part of the Dodd-Frank Act regulatory
restructuring.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. Federal
law requires each federal banking agency to prescribe certain
standards for all insured depository institutions. These
standards relate to, among other things, internal controls,
information systems and audit systems, loan documentation,
credit underwriting, interest rate risk exposure, asset growth,
compensation, and other operational and managerial standards as
the agency deems appropriate. The federal banking agencies
adopted Interagency Guidelines Prescribing Standards for Safety
and Soundness to implement the safety and soundness standards
required under federal law. The guidelines set forth the safety
and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to
identify and address problems at insured depository institutions
before capital becomes impaired. If the appropriate federal
banking agency determines that an institution fails to meet any
standard prescribed by the guidelines, the agency may require
the institution to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to
achieve compliance with the standard. If an institution fails to
meet these standards, the appropriate federal banking agency may
require the institution to submit a compliance plan.
Prompt Corrective Action Regulations. Under
the prompt corrective action regulations, the Office of Thrift
Supervision is required and authorized to take supervisory
actions against undercapitalized savings banks. For this
purpose, a savings bank is placed in one of the following five
categories based on the savings banks capital:
|
|
|
|
|
well-capitalized (at least 5% (core) capital, 6% Tier 1
risk-based capital and 10% total risk-based capital);
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
adequately capitalized (at least 4% leverage capital, 4%
Tier 1 risk-based capital and 8% total risk-based capital);
|
|
|
|
undercapitalized (less than 3% leverage capital, 4% Tier 1
risk-based capital or 8% total risk-based capital);
|
|
|
|
significantly undercapitalized (less than 3% leverage capital,
3% Tier 1 risk-based capital or 6% total risk-based
capital); and
|
|
|
|
critically undercapitalized (less than 2% tangible capital).
|
Generally, the banking regulator is required to appoint a
receiver or conservator for a savings bank that is
critically undercapitalized within specific time
frames. The regulations also provide that a capital restoration
plan must be filed with the Office of Thrift Supervision within
45 days of the date a savings bank receives notice that it
is undercapitalized, significantly
undercapitalized, or critically
undercapitalized. The criteria for an acceptable capital
restoration plan include, among other things, the establishment
of the methodology and assumptions for attaining adequately
capitalized status on an annual basis, procedures for ensuring
compliance with restrictions imposed by applicable federal
regulations, the identification of the types and levels of
activities the savings bank will engage in while the capital
restoration plan is in effect, and assurances that the capital
restoration plan will not appreciably increase the current risk
profile of the savings bank. Any holding company for the savings
bank required to submit a capital restoration plan must
guarantee the lesser of an amount equal to 5% of the savings
banks assets at the time it was notified or deemed to be
undercapitalized by the Office of Thrift Supervision, or the
amount necessary to restore the savings bank to adequately
capitalized status. This guarantee remains in place until the
Office of Thrift Supervision notifies the savings bank that it
has maintained adequately capitalized status for each of four
consecutive calendar quarters, and the Office of Thrift
Supervision has the authority to require payment and collect
payment under the guarantee. Failure by a holding company to
provide the required guarantee will result in certain operating
restrictions on the savings bank, such as restrictions on the
ability to declare and pay dividends, pay executive compensation
and management fees, and increase assets or expand operations.
The Office of Thrift Supervision may also take any one of a
number of discretionary supervisory actions against
undercapitalized associations, including the issuance of a
capital directive and the replacement of senior executive
officers and directors.
At December 31, 2010, Northfield Bank met the criteria for
being considered well-capitalized.
Federal Reserve System. The Federal Reserve
System requires all depository institutions to maintain
noninterest-bearing reserves at specified levels against
transaction accounts and non-personal time deposits. The
balances maintained to meet the reserve requirements imposed by
the Federal Reserve System may be used to satisfy the Office of
Thrift Supervision liquidity requirements.
Savings institutions have authority to borrow from the Federal
Reserve System discount window. Northfield Bank
maintains a primary credit facility at the Federal
Reserves discount window. Northfield Bank had no
borrowings from the Federal Reserves discount window as of
December 31, 2010.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. Northfield
Banks deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the
Deposit Insurance Fund of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation. The Deposit Insurance Fund is the successor to the
Bank Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund,
which were merged in 2006.
Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations
risk-based assessment system, insured institutions are assigned
to one of four risk categories based on supervisory evaluations,
regulatory capital levels, and certain other factors, with less
risky institutions paying lower assessments. An
institutions assessment rate depends upon the category to
which it is assigned and certain adjustments specified by
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation regulations. Assessment
rates currently range from seven to 77.5 basis points of
assessable deposits. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
may adjust the scale uniformly, except that no adjustment can
deviate more than three basis points from the base scale without
notice and comment. No institution may pay a dividend if in
default of the federal deposit insurance assessment.
27
The Dodd-Frank Act requires the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation to amend its procedures to base assessments on total
average assets less average tangible equity rather than
deposits. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has
finalized the rule on February 7, 2011, and it will be
effective for the second quarter 2011, assessment.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation imposed on all insured
institutions a special emergency assessment of five basis points
of total assets minus Tier 1 capital, as of June 30,
2009 (capped at ten basis points of an institutions
deposit assessment base), in order to cover losses to the
Deposit Insurance Fund. That special assessment was collected on
September 30, 2009. The Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation provided for similar assessments during the final
two quarters of 2009, if deemed necessary. In lieu of further
special assessments, however, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation required insured institutions to prepay estimated
quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009
through the fourth quarter of 2012. That pre-payment, which
included an assumed assessment base increase of 5%, was due on
December 30, 2009. The prepayment was recorded as a prepaid
expense (an asset) as of December 30, 2009. As of
December 31, 2009 and each quarter thereafter, a charge to
earnings is recorded for each regular assessment with an
offsetting credit to the prepaid expense.
Due to the recent difficult economic conditions, deposit
insurance per account owner has been raised to $250,000 for all
types of accounts. That coverage was made permanent by the
Dodd-Frank Act. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation adopted an optional Temporary Liquidity Guarantee
Program by which, for a fee, noninterest bearing transaction
accounts would receive unlimited insurance coverage until
June 30, 2010, subsequently extended to December 31,
2010, and certain senior unsecured debt issued by institutions
and their holding companies between October 13, 2008 and
December 31, 2009 would be guaranteed by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation through June 30, 2012, or in
some cases, December 31, 2012. Northfield Bank opted not to
participate in the unlimited coverage for noninterest bearing
transaction accounts and Northfield Bank, Northfield Bancorp,
Inc. and Northfield Bancorp, MHC also did not participate in the
debt guarantee program. The Dodd-Frank Act adopted unlimited
coverage for certain non-interest bearing transactions accounts
for January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012, with no
opt out option.
In addition to the assessment for deposit insurance,
institutions are required to make payments on bonds issued in
the late 1980s by the Financing Corporation to recapitalize a
predecessor deposit insurance fund. That payment is established
quarterly and during the four quarters ended December 31,
2010, averaged 1.045 basis points of assessable deposits.
The Dodd-Frank Act increased the minimum target Deposit
Insurance Fund ratio from 1.15% of estimated insured deposits to
1.35% of estimated insured deposits. The Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation must seek to achieve the 1.35% ratio by
September 30, 2020. Insured institutions with assets of
$10 billion or more are targeted to fund the increase. The
Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the 1.5% maximum fund ratio, instead
leaving it to the discretion of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has
recently exercised that discretion by establishing a long range
fund ratio of 2%.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has authority to
increase insurance assessments. A significant increase in
insurance premiums would likely have an adverse effect on the
operating expenses and results of operations of Northfield Bank.
We cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the
future.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation upon a finding that the institution has
engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or
unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any
applicable law, regulation, rule, order or regulatory condition
imposed in writing. We do not know of any practice, condition,
or violation that might lead to termination of Northfield
Banks deposit insurance.
Federal
Home Loan Bank System
Northfield Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank
System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks.
The Federal Home Loan Bank System provides a central credit
facility primarily for member institutions. As a member of the
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, Northfield Bank is
28
required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. As of December 31,
2010, Northfield Bank was in compliance with its ownership
requirement, holding $9.8 million of Federal Home Loan Bank
of New York stock.
Other
Regulations
Some interest and other charges collected or contracted by
Northfield Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws
concerning interest rates and charges. Northfield Banks
operations also are subject to federal laws applicable to credit
transactions, such as the:
|
|
|
|
|
Truth-In-Lending
Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, requiring that borrowers
for mortgage loans for one- to four-family residential real
estate receive various disclosures, including good faith
estimates of settlement costs, lender servicing and escrow
account practices, and prohibiting certain practices that
increase the cost of settlement services;
|
|
|
|
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, requiring financial institutions
to provide information to enable the public and public officials
to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its
obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it
serves;
|
|
|
|
Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the
basis of race, creed, or other prohibited factors in extending
credit;
|
|
|
|
Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the use and provision of
information to credit reporting agencies;
|
|
|
|
Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer
debts may be collected by collection agencies; and
|
|
|
|
Rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged
with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws.
|
The operations of Northfield Bank also are subject to the:
|
|
|
|
|
Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain
confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes
procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of
financial records;
|
|
|
|
Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated
thereunder, that govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals
from deposit accounts and customers rights and liabilities
arising from the use of automated teller machines and other
electronic banking services;
|
|
|
|
Title III of The Uniting and Strengthening America by
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct
Terrorism Act of 2001 (referred to as the USA PATRIOT
Act), which significantly expanded the responsibilities of
financial institutions, in preventing the use of the United
States financial system to fund terrorist activities. Among
other things, the USA PATRIOT Act and the related regulations of
the Office of Thrift Supervision require savings banks operating
in the United States to develop anti-money laundering compliance
programs, due diligence policies and controls to ensure the
detection and reporting of money laundering. Such required
compliance programs are intended to supplement existing
compliance requirements, also applicable to financial
institutions, under the Bank Secrecy Act and the Office of
Foreign Assets Control Regulations; and
|
|
|
|
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which places limitations on the
sharing of consumer financial information by financial
institutions with unaffiliated third parties. Specifically, the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions
offering financial products or services to retail customers to
provide such customers with the financial institutions
privacy policy and provide such customers the opportunity to
opt out of the sharing of certain personal financial
information with unaffiliated third parties, if the financial
institution customarily shares such information.
|
29
Holding
Company Regulation
General. Northfield Bancorp, MHC and
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. are non-diversified savings and loan
holding companies within the meaning of the Home Owners
Loan Act. As such, Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. are registered with the Office of Thrift
Supervision and subject to Office of Thrift Supervision
regulations, examinations, supervision, and reporting
requirements. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision has
enforcement authority over Northfield Bancorp, MHC and
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and their subsidiaries. Among other
things, this authority permits the Office of Thrift Supervision
to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a
serious risk to the subsidiary savings institution. As federal
corporations, Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bancorp,
Inc. generally are not subject to state business organization
laws.
The Dodd-Frank Act transfers to the Federal Reserve Board the
responsibility for regulating, and supervising savings and loan
holding companies. The Federal Reserve Board will assume the
regulation and supervision of Northfield Bancorp, MHC, and
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. on July 21, 2011 (subject to a
possible six-month extension).
Permitted Activities. Pursuant to
Section 10(o) of the Home Owners Loan Act and Office
of Thrift Supervision regulations and policy, a mutual holding
company and a federally chartered mid-tier holding company, such
as Northfield Bancorp, Inc., may, with appropriate regulatory
approvals, engage in the following activities:
(i) investing in the stock of a savings bank;
(ii) acquiring a mutual association through the merger of
such association into a savings bank subsidiary of such holding
company or an interim savings bank subsidiary of such holding
company;
(iii) merging with or acquiring another holding company,
one of whose subsidiaries is a savings bank;
(iv) investing in a corporation, the capital stock of which
is available for purchase by a savings bank under federal law or
under the law of any state where the subsidiary savings bank or
association share their home offices;
(v) furnishing or performing management services for a
savings bank subsidiary of such company;
(vi) holding, managing, or liquidating assets owned or
acquired from a savings bank subsidiary of such company;
(vii) holding or managing properties used or occupied by a
savings bank subsidiary of such company;
(viii) acting as trustee under deeds of trust;
(ix) any other activity:
(a) that the Federal Reserve Board, by regulation, has
determined to be permissible for bank holding companies under
Section 4(c) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956,
unless the Director, by regulation, prohibits or limits any such
activity for savings and loan holding companies;
(b) in which multiple savings and loan holding companies
were authorized (by regulation) to directly engage on
March 5, 1987; or
(x) any activity permissible for financial holding
companies under Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company
Act, including securities and insurance underwriting, provided
that the mutual holding company meets the qualitative criteria
applicable to financial holding companies and otherwise complies
with the requirements that would apply to a financial holding
companys conduct of the activity involved, and
(xi) purchasing, holding, or disposing of stock acquired in
connection with a qualified stock issuance if the purchase of
such stock by such savings and loan holding company is approved
by the Director.
30
(xii) If a mutual holding company acquires or merges with
another holding company, the holding company acquired or the
holding company resulting from such merger or acquisition may
only invest in assets and engage in activities listed in
(i) through (x) above, and has a period of two years
to cease any nonconforming activities and divest any
nonconforming investments.
The Home Owners Loan Act prohibits a savings and loan
holding company, including Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and
Northfield Bancorp, MHC, directly or indirectly, or through one
or more subsidiaries, from acquiring more than 5% of another
savings institution or savings and loan holding company, without
prior written approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision. It
also prohibits the acquisition or retention of, with certain
exceptions, more than 5% of a nonsubsidiary company engaged in
activities other than those permitted by the Home Owners
Loan Act or acquiring or retaining control of an institution
that is not federally insured. In evaluating applications by
holding companies to acquire savings institutions, the Office of
Thrift Supervision must consider such things as the financial
and managerial resources, future prospects of the company and
institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk
to the federal deposit insurance fund, the convenience and needs
of the community and competitive factors.
The Office of Thrift Supervision is prohibited from approving
any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings and loan
holding company controlling savings institutions in more than
one state, subject to two exceptions:
(i) the approval of interstate supervisory acquisitions by
savings and loan holding companies; and
(ii) the acquisition of a savings institution in another
state if the laws of the state of the target savings institution
specifically permit such acquisition.
The states vary in the extent to which they permit interstate
savings and loan holding company acquisitions.
Waivers of Dividends by Northfield Bancorp,
MHC. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations
require Northfield Bancorp, MHC to notify the Office of Thrift
Supervision of any proposed waiver of its receipt of dividends
from Northfield Bancorp, Inc. The Office of Thrift Supervision
reviews dividend waiver notices on a
case-by-case
basis, and, in general, does not object to any such waiver if:
(i) the waiver would not be detrimental to the safe and
sound operation of the subsidiary savings bank; and
(ii) the mutual holding companys board of directors
determines that such waiver is consistent with such
directors fiduciary duties to the mutual holding
companys members. Northfield Bancorp, MHC waived
approximately $4.7 million in dividends declared in 2010.
Recently, the Office of Thrift Supervision has required a mutual
holding company seeking a dividend waiver to have at least
$50,000 in liquid assets.
The Dodd-Frank Act addressed the issue of dividend waivers in
the context of the transfer of the supervision of savings and
loan holding companies from the Office of Thrift Supervision to
the Federal Reserve Board. The Dodd-Frank Act specified that
dividends may be waived if certain conditions are met, including
that the Federal Reserve Board does not object after being given
written notice of the dividend and proposed waiver. The
Dodd-Frank Act indicates that the Federal Reserve Board may not
object to such a waiver (i) if the mutual holding company
involved has, prior to December 1, 2009, reorganized into a
mutual holding company structure, engaged in a minority stock
offering and waived dividends; (ii) the board of directors
of the mutual holding company expressly determines that a waiver
of the dividend is consistent with its fiduciary duties to
members and (iii) the waiver would not be detrimental to
the safe and sound operation of the savings association
subsidiaries of the holding company. The Federal Reserve Board
has not previously permitted dividend waivers by mutual bank
holding companies and may object to dividend waivers involving
mutual savings and loan holding companies, notwithstanding the
referenced language in the Dodd-Frank Act. Northfield Bancorp,
MHC was formed, engaged in a minority stock offering (through
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.), and waived dividends prior to
December 1, 2009.
31
Capital. Savings and loan holding companies
are not currently subject to specific regulatory capital
requirements. The Dodd-Frank Act, however, requires the Federal
Reserve Board to promulgate consolidated capital requirements
for depository institution holding companies that are no less
stringent, both quantitatively and in terms of components of
capital, than those applicable to institutions themselves. That
will eliminate the inclusion of certain instruments, such as
trust preferred securities, from tier 1 capital.
Instruments issued by mutual holding companies before
May 19, 2010 will be grandfathered. There is a five year
transition period from the July 21, 2010 date of enactment
of the Dodd-Frank Act before the capital requirements will apply
to savings and loan holding companies.
Source of Strength. The Dodd-Frank Act also
extends the source of strength doctrine to savings
and loan holding companies. The regulatory agencies must
promulgate regulations implementing the source of
strength policy that requires holding companies act as a
source of strength to their subsidiary depository institutions
by providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of
financial stress.
Conversion of Northfield Bancorp, MHC to Stock
Form. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations
permit Northfield Bancorp, MHC to convert from the mutual form
of organization to the capital stock form of organization. There
can be no assurance when, if ever, a conversion transaction will
occur, and the board of directors has no current intention or
plan to undertake a conversion transaction. In a conversion
transaction, a new stock holding company would be formed as the
successor to Northfield Bancorp, Inc., Northfield Bancorp,
MHCs corporate existence would end, and certain depositors
of Northfield Bank would receive the right to subscribe for
additional shares of the new holding company. In a conversion
transaction, each share of common stock held by stockholders
other than Northfield Bancorp, MHC would be automatically
converted into a number of shares of common stock of the new
holding company determined pursuant to an exchange ratio that
ensures that stockholders other than Northfield Bancorp, MHC own
the same percentage of common stock in the new holding company
as they owned in Northfield Bancorp, Inc. immediately prior to
the conversion transaction, subject to adjustment for any assets
held by Northfield Bancorp, MHC. Any such transaction would
require the approval of our stockholders, including, under
current Office of Thrift Supervision regulations, stockholders
other than Northfield Bancorp, Inc., as well as depositors of
Northfield Bank.
The Dodd-Frank Act provides that waived dividends will not be
considered in determining the appropriate exchange ratio after
the transfer of responsibilities to the Federal Reserve Board,
provided that the mutual holding company involved was formed,
engaged in a minority offering and waived dividends prior to
December 1, 2009. Northfield Bancorp, MHC was formed,
engaged in a minority stock offering (through Northfield
Bancorp, Inc.), and waived dividends prior to December 1,
2009.
Liquidation Rights. Each depositor of
Northfield Bank has both a deposit account in Northfield Bank
and a pro rata ownership interest in the net worth of Northfield
Bancorp, MHC based on the deposit balance in his or her account.
This ownership interest is tied to the depositors account
and has no tangible market value separate from the deposit
account. This interest may only be realized in the unlikely
event of a complete liquidation of Northfield Bank. Any
depositor who opens a deposit account obtains a pro rata
ownership interest in Northfield Bancorp, MHC without any
additional payment beyond the amount of the deposit. A depositor
who reduces or closes his or her account receives a portion or
all, respectively, of the balance in the deposit account but
nothing for his or her ownership interest in the net worth of
Northfield Bancorp, MHC, which is lost to the extent that the
balance in the account is reduced or closed.
In the unlikely event of a complete liquidation of Northfield
Bank, all claims of creditors of Northfield Bank, including
those of depositors of Northfield Bank (to the extent of their
deposit balances), would be paid first. Thereafter, if there
were any assets of Northfield Bank remaining, these assets would
be distributed to Northfield Bancorp, Inc. as Northfield
Banks sole stockholder. Then, if there were any assets of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. remaining, depositors of Northfield
Bank would receive those remaining assets, pro rata, based upon
the deposit balances in their deposit account in Northfield Bank
immediately prior to liquidation.
32
Regulatory
Restructuring Legislation
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act
into law. In addition to eliminating the Office of Thrift
Supervision and creating the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau, the Dodd-Frank Act, among other things, directs changes
in the way that institutions are assessed for deposit insurance,
mandates the imposition of consolidated capital requirements on
savings and loan holding companies, requires originators of
securitized loans to retain a percentage of the risk for the
transferred loans, regulatory rate-setting for certain debit
card interchange fees, repeals restrictions on the payment of
interest on commercial demand deposits and contains a number of
reforms related to mortgage originations. Many of the provisions
of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to delayed effective dates
and/or
require the issuance of implementing regulations. Their impact
on operations cannot yet be fully assessed. However, there is
significant possibility that the Dodd-Frank Act will, at a
minimum, result in increased regulatory burden, compliance
costs, and interest expense for Northfield Bank, Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bancorp, MHC.
Federal
Securities Laws
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s common stock is registered with
the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is
subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading
restrictions, and other requirements under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 addresses, among other issues,
corporate governance, auditing and accounting, executive
compensation, and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate
information. As directed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are required to
certify that our quarterly and annual reports do not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact. The rules adopted by the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
have several requirements, including having these officers
certify that: (i) they are responsible for establishing,
maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting; (ii) they have
made certain disclosures to our auditors and the audit committee
of the board of directors about our internal control over
financial reporting; and (iii) they have included
information in our quarterly and annual reports about their
evaluation and whether there have been changes in our internal
control over financial reporting or in other factors that could
materially affect internal control over financial reporting.
33
TAXATION
Federal
Taxation
General. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and
Northfield Bank are subject to federal income taxation in the
same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions
discussed below. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bank
are part of a consolidated tax group and file consolidated tax
returns including Northfield Banks wholly-owned
subsidiaries. Northfield Bancorp, MHC does not own at least 80%
of the common stock of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and therefore
files a separate federal tax return.
Northfield Bancorp, Incs consolidated federal tax returns
are not currently under audit, and have not been audited during
the past five years. The following discussion of federal
taxation is intended only to summarize certain pertinent federal
income tax matters and is not a comprehensive description of the
tax rules applicable to Northfield Bancorp, MHC, Northfield
Bancorp, Inc., or Northfield Bank.
Method of Accounting. For federal income tax
purposes, Northfield Bancorp, MHC reports its income and
expenses on the accrual method of accounting and uses a tax year
ending December 31 for filing its federal and state income tax
returns.
Bad Debt Reserves. Historically, Northfield
Bank was subject to special provisions in the tax law applicable
to qualifying savings banks regarding allowable tax bad debt
deductions and related reserves. Tax law changes were enacted in
1996 that eliminated the ability of savings banks to use the
percentage of taxable income method for computing tax bad debt
reserves for tax years after 1995, and required recapture into
taxable income over a six-year period of all bad debt reserves
accumulated after a savings banks last tax year beginning
before January 1, 1988. Northfield Bank recaptured its post
December 31, 1987, bad-debt reserve balance over the
six-year period ended December 31, 2004.
The State of New York passed legislation in August of 2010 to
conform the bad debt deduction allowed under Article 32 of
the New York State tax law to the bad debt deduction allowed for
federal income tax purposes. As a result, Northfield Bank no
longer establishes, or maintains, a New York reserve for losses
on loans, and is required to claim a deduction for bad debts in
an amount equal to its actual loan loss experience. In addition,
this legislation eliminated the potential recapture of the New
York tax bad debt reserve that could have otherwise occurred in
certain circumstances under New York State tax law prior to
August of 2010. As a result of this new legislation, the Company
reversed approximately $738,000 in deferred tax liabilities
during the third quarter of 2010.
Taxable Distributions and Recapture. Prior to
1996, bad debt reserves created prior to 1988 were subject to
recapture into taxable income if Northfield Bank failed to meet
certain thrift asset and definitional tests or made certain
distributions. Tax law changes in 1996 eliminated thrift-related
recapture rules. However, under current law, pre-1988 tax bad
debt reserves remain subject to recapture if Northfield Bank
makes certain non-dividend distributions, repurchases any of its
common stock, pays dividends in excess of earnings and profits,
or fails to qualify as a bank for tax purposes.
At December 31, 2010, the total federal pre-base year bad
debt reserve of Northfield Bank was approximately
$5.9 million.
Alternative Minimum Tax. The Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, imposes an alternative minimum tax at
a rate of 20% on a base of regular taxable income plus certain
tax preferences, less any available exemption. The alternative
minimum tax is imposed to the extent it exceeds the regular
income tax. Net operating losses can offset no more than 90% of
alternative taxable income. Certain payments of alternative
minimum tax may be used as credits against regular tax
liabilities in future years. Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s
consolidated group has not been subject to the alternative
minimum tax and has no such amounts available as credits for
carryover.
Net Operating Loss Carryovers. A financial
institution may carry back net operating losses to the preceding
two taxable years and forward to the succeeding 20 taxable
years. At December 31, 2010, Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
consolidated group had no net operating loss carryforwards for
federal income tax purposes.
34
Corporate Dividends-Received
Deduction. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. may exclude
from its federal taxable income 100% of dividends received from
Northfield Bank as a wholly-owned subsidiary by filing
consolidated tax returns. The corporate dividends-received
deduction is 80% when the corporation receiving the dividend
owns at least 20% of the stock of the distributing corporation.
The dividends-received deduction is 70% when the corporation
receiving the dividend owns less than 20% of the distributing
corporation.
State/City
Taxation
Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bank report income on a
calendar year basis to New York State. New York State franchise
tax on corporations is imposed in an amount equal to the greater
of (a) 7.1% (for 2007 and forward) of entire net
income allocable to New York State, (b) 3% of
alternative entire net income allocable to New York
State, or (c) 0.01% of the average value of assets
allocable to New York State plus nominal minimum tax of $250 per
company. Entire net income is based on federal taxable income,
subject to certain modifications. Alternative entire net income
is equal to entire net income without certain modifications.
Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bank report income on a
calendar year basis to New York City. New York City franchise
tax on corporations is imposed in an amount equal to the greater
of (a) 9.0% of entire net income allocable to
New York State, (b) 3% of alternative entire net
income allocable to New York City, or (c) 0.01% of
the average value of assets allocable to New York City plus
nominal minimum tax of $250 per company. Entire net income is
based on federal taxable income, subject to certain
modifications. Alternative entire net income is equal to entire
net income without certain modifications.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bank file New Jersey
Corporation Business Tax returns on a calendar year basis.
Generally, the income derived from New Jersey sources is subject
to New Jersey tax. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bank
pay the greater of the corporate business tax (CBT)
at 9% of taxable income or the minimum tax of $1,200 per entity.
At December 31, 2005, Northfield Bank did not meet the
definition of a domestic building and loan association for New
York State and City tax purposes. As a result, we were required
to recognize a $2.2 million deferred tax liability for
state and city thrift-related base-year bad debt reserves
accumulated after December 31, 1987.
Our state tax returns are not currently under audit or have not
been subject to an audit during the past five years, except as
follows. Our New York state tax returns for the years ended
December 31, 2000, through December 31, 2006, were
subject to an audit by the State of New York with respect to our
operation of NSB Services Corp. as a Delaware corporation not
subject to New York State taxation. In 2007, the Company
concluded the audit by the State of New York with respect to the
Companys combined state tax returns for years 2000 through
2006.
The material risks and uncertainties that management believes
affect us are described below. You should carefully consider the
risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of
the other information included or incorporated by reference
herein. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the
only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties that
management is not aware of or focused on or that management
currently deems immaterial may also impair our business
operations. This report is qualified in its entirety by these
risk factors. See also, Forward-Looking Statements.
Our
Concentration in Multifamily Loans, Commercial Real Estate
Loans, and Construction and Land Lending Could Expose Us to
Increased Lending Risks and Related Loan Losses
Our current business strategy is to continue to emphasize
multifamily loans and to a lesser extent commercial real estate
loans. At December 31, 2010, $658.0 million, or 79.6%
of our total loan portfolio, consisted of multifamily,
commercial real estate, and construction and land loans. As a
result, our credit risk profile may be higher than traditional
thrift institutions that have higher concentrations of one- to
four-family
35
residential mortgage loans. In addition, at December 31,
2010, our largest industry concentration of commercial real
estate loans was hotels and motels, which totaled
$28.8 million, or 8.5% of commercial real estate loans at
that date.
A
Significant Portion of Our Loan Portfolio is
Unseasoned
Our loan portfolio has grown to $826.7 million at
December 31, 2010, from $409.2 million at
December 31, 2006. It is difficult to assess the future
performance of these recently originated loans because of our
relatively limited history in commercial real estate,
multifamily, and construction lending. These loans may
experience higher delinquency or charge-off levels above our
historical experience, which could adversely affect our future
performance.
If Our
Allowance for Loan Losses is Not Sufficient to Cover Actual Loan
Losses, Our Earnings Could Decrease
We make various assumptions and judgments about the
collectibility of our loan portfolio, including the
creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real
estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment
of many of our loans. In determining the amount of the allowance
for loan losses, we review our loans and our loss and
delinquency experience, as well as the experience of other
similarly situated institutions, and we evaluate other factors
including, among other things, current economic conditions. If
our assumptions are incorrect, our allowance for loan losses may
not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan
portfolio, which would require additions to our allowance.
Material additions to our allowance would materially decrease
our net income. In addition, bank regulators periodically review
our allowance for loan losses and, based on information
available to them at the time of their review, may require us to
increase our allowance for loan losses or recognize further loan
charge-offs. An increase in our allowance for loan losses or
loan charge-offs as required by these regulatory authorities may
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operations.
Because
Most of Our Borrowers are Located in the New York Metropolitan
Area, a Prolonged Downturn in the Local Economy, and a Decline
in Local Real Estate Values Could Cause an Increase in
Nonperforming Loans, or a Decrease in Loan Demand, Which Would
Reduce our Profits
Substantially all loans are secured by real estate located in
our primary market areas. Continued weakness in our economy and
our real estate markets could adversely affect the ability of
our borrowers to repay their loans and the value of the
collateral securing our loans. Real estate values are affected
by various other factors, including supply and demand, changes
in general or regional economic conditions, interest rates,
governmental rules or policies, natural disasters, and terrorist
attacks. Continued negative economic conditions also could
result in reduced loan demand and a decline in loan originations.
Declines
in Real Estate Values Could Decrease Our Loan Originations and
Increase Delinquencies and Defaults
Declines in real estate values in our market area could
adversely affect our results from operations. Like all financial
institutions, we are subject to the effects of any economic
downturn. In particular, a significant decline in real estate
values would likely lead to a decrease in new multifamily,
commercial real estate, and home equity loan originations and
increased delinquencies and defaults in our real estate loan
portfolio. Declines in the average sale prices of real estate in
our primary markets could lead to higher loan losses.
Continued
Increases in Loan Delinquencies and Defaults Could Result in
Further Deterioration of Our Asset Quality Ratios
If delinquencies do not improve, and non-accrual and
non-performing loans continue to increase, our asset quality
ratios, such as non-performing loans to total loans
held-for-investment,
net, could deteriorate.
36
We Could
Record Future Losses on Our Securities Portfolio
During the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized
total
other-than-temporary
impairment on our securities portfolio of $962,000, of which
$154,000 was considered to be credit-related and, therefore,
recorded as a loss through a reduction of non-interest income. A
number of factors or combinations of factors could require us to
conclude in one or more future reporting periods that an
unrealized loss that exists with respect to our securities
portfolio constitutes additional impairment that is other than
temporary, which could result in material losses to us. These
factors include, but are not limited to, a continued failure by
an issuer to make scheduled interest payments, an increase in
the severity of the unrealized loss on a particular security, an
increase in the continuous duration of the unrealized loss
without an improvement in value or changes in market conditions
and/or
industry or issuer specific factors that would render us unable
to forecast a full recovery in value. In addition, the fair
values of securities could decline if the overall economy and
the financial condition of some of the issuers continue to
deteriorate and there remains limited liquidity for these
securities.
If the
Companys Investment in the Common Stock of the Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York is Classified as
Other-Than-Temporarily
Impaired or as Permanently Impaired, Earnings and
Stockholders Equity Could Decrease
The Company owns stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
(FHLB-NY), which is part of the Federal Home Loan Bank System.
The FHLB-NY common stock is held to qualify for membership in
the FHLB-NY and to be eligible to borrow funds under the
FHLB-NYs advance programs. The aggregate cost of our
FHLB-NY common stock as of December 31, 2010, was
$9.8 million based on its par value. There is no market for
FHLB-NY common stock.
Although the FHLB-NY is not reporting current operating
difficulties, recent published reports indicate that certain
member banks of the Federal Home Loan Bank System may be subject
to accounting rules and asset quality risks that could result in
materially lower regulatory capital levels. In an extreme
situation, it is possible that the capital of the Federal Home
Loan Bank System, including the FHLB-NY, could be substantially
diminished. Consequently, there is a risk that the
Companys investment in FHLB-NY common stock could be
deemed
other-than-temporarily
impaired at some time in the future, and if this occurs, it
would cause earnings and stockholders equity to decrease
by the impairment charge.
A
Significant Amount of Our Securities Portfolio is Guaranteed or
Issued by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac
Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are under conservatorship with
the Federal Housing Finance Agency. On February 11, 2011,
the Obama administration presented the U.S. Congress with a
report of its proposals for reforming Americas housing
finance market with the goal of scaling back the role of the
U.S. government in, and promoting the return of private
capital to, the mortgage markets and ultimately winding down
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Without mentioning a specific time
frame, the report calls for the reduction of the role of Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac in the mortgage markets by, among other
things, reducing conforming loan limits, increasing guarantee
fees, and requiring larger down payments by borrowers. The
report presents three options for the long-term structure of
housing finance, all of which call for the unwinding of Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac and a reduced role of the government in the
mortgage market: (1) a system with U.S. government
insurance limited to a narrowly targeted group of borrowers;
(2) a system similar to (1) above except with an
expanded guarantee during times of crisis; and (3) a system
where the U.S. government offers catastrophic reinsurance
for the securities of a targeted range of mortgages behind
significant private capital. We cannot be certain if or when
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be wound down, if or when reform
of the housing finance market will be implemented or what the
future role of the U.S. government will be in the mortgage
market, and, accordingly, we will not be able to determine the
effect that any such reform may have on us until a definitive
reform plan is adopted.
37
Changes
in Our Accounting Policies or in Accounting Standards Could
Materially Affect How We Report Our Financial Results and
Condition
Our accounting policies are essential to understanding our
financial results and condition. Some of these policies require
the use of estimates and assumptions that may affect the value
of our assets or liabilities and financial results. Some of our
accounting policies are critical because they require management
to make difficult, subjective, and complex judgments about
matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely
that materially different amounts would be reported under
different conditions or using different assumptions. If such
estimates or assumptions underlying our financial statements are
incorrect, we may experience material losses.
From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) and the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) change the
financial accounting and reporting standards or the
interpretation of those standards that govern the preparation of
our external financial statements. These changes are beyond our
control, can be hard to predict and could materially impact how
we report our results of operations and financial condition. We
could be required to apply a new or revised standard
retroactively, resulting in our restating prior period financial
statements in material amounts.
The Need
to Account for Certain Assets at Estimated Fair Value May
Adversely Affect Our Results of Operations
We report certain assets, including securities, at fair value.
Generally, for assets that are reported at fair value, we use
quoted market prices or valuation models that utilize observable
market inputs to estimate fair value. Because we carry these
assets on our books at their estimated fair value, we may incur
losses even if the asset in question presents minimal credit
risk. Elevated delinquencies, defaults, and estimated losses
from the disposition of collateral in our private-label
mortgage-backed securities portfolio may require us to recognize
additional
other-than-temporary
impairments in future periods with respect to our securities
portfolio. The amount and timing of any impairment recognized
will depend on the severity and duration of the decline in the
estimated fair value of the securities and our estimation of the
anticipated recovery period.
We Hold
Certain Intangible Assets that Could Be Classified as Impaired
in The Future. If These Assets Are Considered To Be Either
Partially or Fully Impaired in the Future, Our Earnings and the
Book Values of These Assets Would Decrease
We are required to test our goodwill for impairment on a
periodic basis. The impairment testing process considers a
variety of factors, including the current market price of our
common shares, the estimated net present value of our assets and
liabilities and information concerning the terminal valuation of
similarly situated insured depository institutions. It is
possible that future impairment testing could result in a
partial or full impairment of the value of our goodwill. If an
impairment determination is made in a future reporting period,
our earnings and the book value of goodwill will be reduced by
the amount of the impairment. If an impairment loss is recorded,
it will have little or no impact on the tangible book value of
our shares of common stock or our regulatory capital levels.
Because
the Nature of the Financial Services Business Involves a High
Volume of Transactions, We Face Significant Operational
Risks
We operate in diverse markets and rely on the ability of our
employees and systems to process a high number of transactions.
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from our
operations, including but not limited to, the risk of fraud by
employees or persons outside our company, the execution of
unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to
transaction processing and technology, breaches of the internal
control system and compliance requirements, and business
continuation and disaster recovery. Insurance coverage may not
be available for such losses, or where available, such losses
may exceed insurance limits. This risk of loss also includes the
potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an
operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with
applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or
their implementation, and customer attrition due to potential
negative publicity. In the event of a breakdown in
38
the internal control system, improper operation of systems or
improper employee actions, we could suffer financial loss, face
regulatory action, and suffer damage to our reputation.
Northfield
Bank is Required to Maintain a Significant Percentage of its
Total Assets in Residential Mortgage Loans and Investments
Secured by Residential Mortgage Loans, Which Restricts Our
Ability to Diversify Our Loan Portfolio
A federal savings bank or thrift differs from a commercial bank
in that it is required to maintain at least 65% of its total
assets in qualified thrift investments which
generally include loans and investments, for the purchase,
refinance, construction, improvement, or repair of residential
real estate, as well as home equity loans, education loans and
small business loans. To maintain our federal savings bank
charter we have to be a qualified thrift lender or
QTL in nine out of each 12 immediately preceding
months. The QTL requirement limits the extent to which we can
grow our commercial loan portfolio, and as a result of
Dodd-Frank, failing the QTL test can result in an enforcement
action. However, a loan that does not exceed $2 million
(including a group of loans to one borrower) that is for
commercial, corporate, business, or agricultural purposes is
included in our qualified thrift investments. Because of the QTL
requirement, we may be limited in our ability to change our
asset mix and increase the yield on our earning assets by
growing our commercial loan portfolio.
In addition, if we continue to grow our commercial loan
portfolio and our single-family residential mortgage loan
portfolio decreases, it is possible that in order to maintain
our QTL status, we could be forced to buy mortgage-backed
securities or other qualifying assets at times when the terms of
such investments may not be attractive. Alternatively, we may
find it necessary to pursue different structures, including
converting Northfield Banks savings bank charter to a
commercial bank charter.
Risks
Associated with System Failures, Interruptions, or Breaches of
Security Could Negatively Affect Our Earnings
Information technology systems are critical to our business. We
use various technology systems to manage our customer
relationships, general ledger, securities, deposits, and loans.
We have established policies and procedures to prevent or limit
the impact of system failures, interruptions, and security
breaches, but there can be no assurance that such events will
not occur or that they will be adequately addressed if they do.
In addition any compromise of our systems could deter customers
from using our products and services. Although we rely on
security systems to provide security and authentication
necessary to effect the secure transmission of data, these
precautions may not protect our systems from compromises or
breaches of security.
In addition, we outsource a majority of our data processing to
certain third-party providers. If these third-party providers
encounter difficulties, or if we have difficulty communicating
with them, our ability to adequately process and account for
transactions could be affected, and our business operations
could be adversely affected. Threats to information security
also exist in the processing of customer information through
various other vendors and their personnel.
The occurrence of any system failures, interruption, or breach
of security could damage our reputation and result in a loss of
customers and business thereby subjecting us to additional
regulatory scrutiny, or could expose us to litigation and
possible financial liability. Any of these events could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations.
We Are
Subject to Extensive Regulatory Oversight
We are subject to extensive supervision, regulation, and
examination by the OTS and by the FDIC. As a result, we are
limited in the manner in which we conduct our business,
undertake new investments and activities, and obtain financing.
This regulatory structure is designed primarily for the
protection of the Deposit Insurance Fund and our depositors, and
not to benefit our stockholders. This regulatory structure also
gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in
connection with their supervisory and enforcement actions and
examination policies, including policies with respect to capital
levels, the timing, and amount of dividend payments, the
classification of assets, adequacy of our community reinvestment
activities, and the
39
establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory
purposes. In addition, we must comply with significant
anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism laws. Government
agencies have the authority to impose monetary penalties and
other sanctions on institutions which fail to comply with these
laws and regulations.
Legislative
or Regulatory Responses to Perceived Financial and Market
Problems Could Impair Our Rights Against Borrowers
Current and future proposals made by members of Congress would
reduce the amount distressed borrowers are otherwise
contractually obligated to pay under their mortgage loans, and
may limit the ability of lenders to foreclose on mortgage
collateral. If proposals such as these, or other proposals
limiting the banks rights as creditor, were to be
implemented, we could experience increased credit losses on our
loans and mortgage-backed securities, or increased expense in
pursuing our remedies as a creditor.
Financial
Reform Legislation Recently Enacted by Congress Will, Among
Other Things, Eliminate the Office of Thrift Supervision,
Tighten Capital Standards, Create a New Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau and Result in New Laws and Regulations that
are Expected to Increase Our Costs of Operations
The President signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act)
which will significantly change the current bank regulatory
structure and affect the lending, investment, trading, and
operating activities of financial institutions and their holding
companies. The Dodd-Frank Act will eliminate our current primary
federal regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, and require
Northfield Bank to be regulated by the Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency (the primary federal regulator for national
banks). The Dodd-Frank Act also authorizes the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System to supervise and
regulate all savings and loan holding companies, in addition to
bank holding companies which it currently regulates. As a
result, the Federal Reserve Boards current regulations
applicable to bank holding companies, including holding company
capital requirements, will apply to savings and loan holding
companies like Northfield Bancorp, Inc. These capital
requirements are substantially similar to the capital
requirements currently applicable to Northfield Bank, as
described in Supervision and Regulation
Federal Banking Regulation Capital
Requirements. The Dodd-Frank Act also requires the Federal
Reserve Board to set minimum capital levels for bank holding
companies that are as stringent as those required for the
insured depository subsidiaries, and the components of
Tier 1 capital would be restricted to capital instruments
that are currently considered to be Tier 1 capital for
insured depository institutions. Bank holding companies with
assets of less than $500 million are exempt from these
capital requirements. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the proceeds of
trust preferred securities are excluded from Tier 1 capital
unless such securities were issued prior to May 19, 2010 by
bank or savings and loan holding companies with less than
$15 billion of assets. The legislation also establishes a
floor for capital of insured depository institutions that cannot
be lower than the standards in effect today, and directs the
federal banking regulators to implement new leverage and capital
requirements within 18 months that take into account
off-balance sheet activities and other risks, including risks
relating to securitized products and derivatives.
The Dodd-Frank Act also creates a new Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau with broad powers to supervise and enforce
consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of
consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings
institutions such as Northfield Bank, including the authority to
prohibit unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts and
practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has
examination and enforcement authority over all banks and savings
institutions with more than $10 billion in assets. Banks
and savings institutions with $10 billion or less in assets
will be examined by their applicable bank regulators. The new
legislation also weakens the federal preemption available for
national banks and federal savings associations, and gives state
attorneys general the ability to enforce applicable federal
consumer protection laws.
The legislation also broadens the base for Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation insurance assessments. Assessments will
now be based on the average consolidated total assets less
tangible equity capital of a financial institution. The
Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increases the maximum amount of
deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit
unions to $250,000 per depositor, retroactive to January 1,
2009, and non-interest bearing transaction accounts have
unlimited deposit insurance through December 31,
40
2013. Lastly, the Dodd-Frank Act will increase stockholder
influence over boards of directors by requiring companies to
give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation
and so-called golden parachute payments, and by
authorizing the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate
rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own
candidates using a companys proxy materials. The
legislation also directs the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate
rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding
company executives, regardless of whether the company is
publicly traded or not.
The Value
of Our Deferred Tax Assets (DTAs) Could be Reduced if Corporate
Tax Rates in the United States are Decreased.
There have been recent discussions in Congress and by the Obama
Administration regarding potentially decreasing the United
States corporate tax rate. While we may benefit in some respects
from any decreases in these corporate tax rates, any reduction
in the United States corporate tax rate would result in a
decrease to the value of our DTAs, which could be significant.
Recent
Health Care Legislation Could Increase Our Expenses or Require
us to Pass Further Costs on to Our Employees, Which Could
Adversely Affect Our Operations, Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Legislation enacted in 2010 requires companies to provide
expanded health care coverage to their employees, such as
affordable coverage to part-time employees and coverage to
dependent adult children of employees. Companies will also be
required to enroll new employees automatically into one of their
health plans. Compliance with these and other new requirements
of the health care legislation will increase our employee
benefits expense, and may require us to pass these costs on to
our employees, which could give us a competitive disadvantage in
hiring and retaining qualified employees.
We Have
Been Negatively Affected by Current Market and Economic
Conditions. A Continuation or Worsening of These Conditions
Could Adversely Affect Our Operations, Financial Condition, and
Earnings
The severe economic recession of 2008 and 2009 and the weak
economic recovery since then have resulted in continued
uncertainty in the financial markets and the expectation of weak
general economic conditions, including high levels of
unemployment, continuing through 2010. The resulting economic
pressure on consumers and businesses has adversely affected our
business, financial condition, and results of operations. The
credit quality of loan and investment securities portfolios has
deteriorated at many financial institutions and the values of
real estate collateral supporting many commercial loans and home
mortgages have declined and may continue to decline. Our
commercial and multi-family real estate loan customers have
experienced increases in vacancy rates and declines in rental
rates for both multi-family and commercial properties. Financial
companies stock prices have been negatively affected, as
has the ability of banks and bank holding companies to raise
capital or borrow in the debt markets. A continuation or
worsening of these conditions could result in reduced loan
demand and further increases in loan delinquencies, loan losses,
loan loss provisions, costs associated with monitoring
delinquent loans and disposing of foreclosed property, and
otherwise negatively affect our operations, financial condition,
and earnings.
Current
Market and Economic Conditions and Related Government Responses
May Significantly Affect Our Operations, Financial Condition,
and Earnings
The severe economic recession of 2008 and 2009 and the weak
economic recovery since then have resulted in continued
uncertainty in the financial markets and the expectation of weak
general economic conditions, including high levels of
unemployment, continuing through 2011. The resulting economic
pressure on consumers and businesses could adversely affect our
business, financial condition, and results of operations. The
credit quality of loan and investment securities portfolios has
deteriorated at many financial institutions and the values of
real estate collateral supporting many commercial loans and home
mortgages have declined and may continue to decline. Financial
companies stock prices have been negatively affected, as
has the ability of banks and bank holding companies to raise
capital or borrow in the debt markets.
41
In addition, deflationary pressures, while possibly lowering our
operating costs, could have a significant negative effect on our
borrowers, especially our business borrowers, and the values of
underlying collateral securing loans, which could negatively
affect our financial performance.
Strong
Competition Within Our Market Areas May Limit Our Growth and
Profitability
Competition in the banking and financial services industry is
intense. In our market areas, we compete with commercial banks,
savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions,
finance companies, mutual funds, money market funds, insurance
companies, and brokerage and investment banking firms operating
locally and elsewhere. Some of our competitors have greater name
recognition and market presence which benefit them in attracting
business and offer certain services that we do not or cannot
provide. In addition, larger competitors may be able to price
loans and deposits more aggressively than we do.
In addition, the recent crises in the financial services
industry have resulted in a number of financial services
companies such as investment banks and automobile and real
estate finance companies electing to become bank holding
companies. These financial services companies traditionally have
generated funds from sources other than insured bank deposits.
Many of the alternative funding sources traditionally utilized
by these companies are no longer available. This has resulted in
these companies relying more on insured bank deposits to fund
their operations, which has increased competition for deposits
and the related costs of such deposits. Our profitability
depends on our continued ability to compete successfully in our
market areas. For additional information, see
Business Northfield Bank Market
Area and Competition.
Changes
in Market Interest Rates Could Adversely Affect Our Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Our financial condition and results of operations are
significantly affected by changes in market interest rates. Our
results of operations substantially depend on our net interest
income, which is the difference between the interest income we
earn on our interest-earning assets and the interest expense we
pay on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our interest-bearing
liabilities generally reprice or mature more quickly than our
interest-earning assets. If rates increase rapidly, we may have
to increase the rates we pay on our deposits and borrowed funds
more quickly than any changes in interest rates earned on our
loans and investments, resulting in a negative effect on
interest spreads and net interest income. In addition, the
effect of rising rates could be compounded if deposit customers
move funds from savings accounts to higher rate certificate of
deposit accounts. Conversely, should market interest rates fall
below current levels, our net interest margin could also be
negatively affected if competitive pressures keep us from
further reducing rates on our deposits, while the yields on our
assets decrease more rapidly through loan prepayments and
interest rate adjustments.
We also are subject to reinvestment risk associated with changes
in interest rates. Changes in interest rates may affect the
average life of loans and mortgage-related securities. Decreases
in interest rates often result in increased prepayments of loans
and mortgage-related securities, as borrowers refinance their
loans to reduce borrowings costs. Under these circumstances, we
are subject to reinvestment risk to the extent we are unable to
reinvest the cash received from such prepayments in loans or
other investments that have interest rates that are comparable
to the interest rates on existing loans and securities.
Additionally, increases in interest rates may decrease loan
demand
and/or may
make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable rate
loans. Changes in interest rates also affect the value of our
interest earning assets and in particular our securities
portfolio. Generally, the value of securities fluctuates
inversely with changes in interest rates.
Our
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Could be
Negatively Affected if We Fail to Grow or Fail to Manage our
Growth Effectively
Our business strategy includes significant growth plans. We
intend to continue pursuing a profitable growth strategy. Our
prospects must be considered carefully in light of risks,
expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in
significant growth strategies. We cannot assure you that we will
be able to expand our market presence in our existing markets or
that any such expansion will not adversely affect our results of
operations. Failure to effectively grow could have a material
adverse effect on our
42
business, future prospects, financial condition, or results of
operations and could adversely affect our ability to
successfully implement our business strategy. In addition, if we
grow more slowly than anticipated, our operating results could
be adversely affected.
Our ability to grow successfully will depend on a variety of
factors including the continued availability of desirable
business opportunities, the competitive responses from other
financial institutions in our market areas and our ability to
manage our growth. While we believe we have the management
resources and internal systems in place to successfully manage
our future growth, there can be no assurance growth
opportunities will be available or growth will be successfully
managed.
Acquisitions
may Disrupt our Business and Dilute Shareholder Value
We regularly evaluate merger and acquisition opportunities and
conduct due diligence activities related to possible
transactions with other financial institutions and financial
services companies. As a result, negotiations may take place and
future mergers or acquisitions involving cash, debt, or equity
securities may occur at any time. We seek merger or acquisition
partners that are culturally similar, have experienced
management, and possess either significant market presence or
have potential for improved profitability through financial
management, economies of scale, or expanded services.
Acquiring other banks, businesses, or branches involves
potential adverse impact to our financial results and various
other risks commonly associated with acquisitions, including,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulty in estimating the value of the target company;
|
|
|
|
payment of a premium over book and market values that may dilute
our tangible book value and earnings per share in the short and
long term;
|
|
|
|
potential exposure to unknown or contingent liabilities of the
target company;
|
|
|
|
exposure to potential asset quality issues of the target company;
|
|
|
|
there may be volatility in reported income as goodwill
impairment losses could occur irregularly and in varying amounts;
|
|
|
|
difficulty and expense of integrating the operations and
personnel of the target company;
|
|
|
|
inability to realize the expected revenue increases, cost
savings, increases in geographic or product presence,
and/or other
projected benefits;
|
|
|
|
potential disruption to our business;
|
|
|
|
potential diversion of our managements time and attention;
|
|
|
|
the possible loss of key employees and customers of the target
company; and
|
|
|
|
potential changes in banking or tax laws or regulations that may
affect the target company.
|
We may
Eliminate Dividends on Our Common Stock
Although we have been paying a quarterly cash dividend to our
stockholders, stockholders are not entitled to receive
dividends. Downturns in domestic and global economies or the
inability to waive dividends to Northfield Bancorp, MHC, could
cause our board of directors to consider, among other things,
the elimination of dividends paid on our common stock.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
No unresolved staff comments.
43
The Bank operates from our home office in Staten Island, New
York, our operations center located at 581 Main Street,
Woodbridge, NJ, and our additional 19 branch offices located in
New York and New Jersey. Our branch offices are located in the
New York Counties of Richmond, and Kings and the New Jersey
Counties of Middlesex and Union. The Bank also has a customer
service center in Norcross, Georgia related to insurance premium
financing. The net book value of our premises, land, and
equipment was $16.1 million at December 31, 2010.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
In the normal course of business, we may be party to various
outstanding legal proceedings and claims. In the opinion of
management, the consolidated financial statements will not be
materially affected by the outcome of such legal proceedings and
claims as of December 31, 2010.
44
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED
STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
|
(a) Our shares of common stock are traded on the NASDAQ
Global Select Market under the symbol NFBK. The
approximate number of holders of record of Northfield Bancorp,
Inc.s common stock as of December 31, 2010, was
4,599. Certain shares of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. are held in
nominee or street name and accordingly,
the number of beneficial owners of such shares is not known or
included in the foregoing number. The following table presents
quarterly market information for Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s
common stock for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
The following information was provided by the NASDAQ Global
Stock Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
13.49
|
|
|
$
|
10.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
13.81
|
|
|
$
|
10.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
15.30
|
|
|
$
|
12.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
|
$
|
12.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
13.94
|
|
|
$
|
12.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
13.10
|
|
|
$
|
11.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
12.19
|
|
|
$
|
10.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
11.25
|
|
|
$
|
8.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
The sources of funds for the payment of a cash dividend are the
retained proceeds from the initial sale of shares of common
stock and earnings on those proceeds, interest, and principal
payments on Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s investments,
including its loan to Northfield Banks Employee Stock
Ownership Plan, and dividends from Northfield Bank.
For a discussion of Northfield Banks ability to pay
dividends, see Supervision and Regulation
Federal Banking Regulation.
45
Stock
Performance Graph
Set forth below is a stock performance graph (Source: SNL
Financial) comparing (a) the cumulative total return on the
Companys Common Stock for the period November 8,
2007, through December 31, 2010, (b) the cumulative
total return of the stocks included in the NASDAQ Composite
Index over such period, and, (c) the cumulative total
return on stocks included in the NASDAQ Bank Index over such
period. Cumulative return assumes the reinvestment of dividends,
and is expressed in dollars based on an assumed investment of
$100.
Total
Return Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ending
|
Index
|
|
|
11/08/07
|
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
|
06/30/08
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
06/30/09
|
|
|
12/31/09
|
|
|
06/30/10
|
|
|
12/31/10
|
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
103.54
|
|
|
|
|
102.87
|
|
|
|
|
108.02
|
|
|
|
|
112.40
|
|
|
|
|
131.61
|
|
|
|
|
127.19
|
|
|
|
|
131.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASDAQ Composite Index
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
98.50
|
|
|
|
|
85.52
|
|
|
|
|
59.12
|
|
|
|
|
69.16
|
|
|
|
|
85.93
|
|
|
|
|
80.25
|
|
|
|
|
101.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASDAQ Bank Index
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
97.42
|
|
|
|
|
76.23
|
|
|
|
|
76.44
|
|
|
|
|
59.16
|
|
|
|
|
63.97
|
|
|
|
|
65.78
|
|
|
|
|
73.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had in effect at December 31, 2010, 2009, and
2008, the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan which was approved by
stockholders on December 17, 2008. The 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of up to 3,073,488
equity awards. On January 30, 2009, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors awarded 832,450 shares
of restricted stock, and 2,102,600 stock options with tandem
stock appreciation rights. In addition, on May 29, 2009, an
employee was granted 3,800 stock options and 4,200 restricted
stock awards, and on January 30, 2010, an employee was
granted 3,000 stock options and 4,400 restricted stock awards.
46
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table shows the Companys repurchase of its
common stock for each calendar month in the three months ended
December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
of Shares that May Yet
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid per
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
Be Purchased Under
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
or Programs(1)
|
|
|
Plans or Programs(1)
|
|
|
October 1, 2010, through October 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,177,033
|
|
November 1, 2010, through November 30, 2010
|
|
|
96,700
|
|
|
|
12.47
|
|
|
|
96,700
|
|
|
|
2,080,333
|
|
December 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010
|
|
|
127,867
|
|
|
|
12.98
|
|
|
|
127,867
|
|
|
|
1,952,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
224,567
|
|
|
|
12.76
|
|
|
|
224,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On October 27, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company
authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the
Company intends to repurchase up to 2,177,033 shares,
representing approximately 5% of its then outstanding shares.
The timing of the repurchases will depend on certain factors,
including but not limited to, market conditions and prices, the
Companys liquidity and capital requirements, and
alternative uses of capital. Any repurchased shares will be held
as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate
purposes. The Company is conducting such repurchases in
accordance with a
Rule 10b5-1
trading plan. |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, the Company has repurchased (under
its current and prior repurchase plans) 2,308,511 shares of
its stock at an average price of $12.06 per share. |
47
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The summary information presented below at the dates or for each
of the years presented is derived in part from our consolidated
financial statements. The following information is only a
summary, and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and notes included in this Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Selected Financial Condition Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,247,167
|
|
|
$
|
2,002,274
|
|
|
$
|
1,757,761
|
|
|
$
|
1,386,918
|
|
|
$
|
1,294,747
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
43,852
|
|
|
|
42,544
|
|
|
|
50,128
|
|
|
|
25,088
|
|
|
|
60,624
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,653
|
|
|
|
24,500
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
4,095
|
|
|
|
3,403
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale,
at estimated market value
|
|
|
1,244,313
|
|
|
|
1,131,803
|
|
|
|
957,585
|
|
|
|
802,417
|
|
|
|
713,098
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
5,060
|
|
|
|
6,740
|
|
|
|
14,479
|
|
|
|
19,686
|
|
|
|
26,169
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Loans
held-for-investment,
net
|
|
|
827,591
|
|
|
|
729,269
|
|
|
|
589,984
|
|
|
|
424,329
|
|
|
|
409,189
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(21,819
|
)
|
|
|
(15,414
|
)
|
|
|
(8,778
|
)
|
|
|
(5,636
|
)
|
|
|
(5,030
|
)
|
Net loans
held-for-investment
|
|
|
805,772
|
|
|
|
713,855
|
|
|
|
581,206
|
|
|
|
418,693
|
|
|
|
404,159
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
74,805
|
|
|
|
43,751
|
|
|
|
42,001
|
|
|
|
41,560
|
|
|
|
32,866
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost
|
|
|
9,784
|
|
|
|
6,421
|
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
|
|
6,702
|
|
|
|
7,186
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,372,842
|
|
|
|
1,316,885
|
|
|
|
1,024,439
|
|
|
|
877,225
|
|
|
|
989,789
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
391,237
|
|
|
|
279,424
|
|
|
|
332,084
|
|
|
|
124,420
|
|
|
|
128,534
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,850,450
|
|
|
|
1,610,734
|
|
|
|
1,371,183
|
|
|
|
1,019,578
|
|
|
|
1,130,753
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
396,717
|
|
|
|
391,540
|
|
|
|
386,578
|
|
|
|
367,340
|
|
|
|
163,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Selected Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
86,495
|
|
|
$
|
85,568
|
|
|
$
|
75,049
|
|
|
$
|
65,702
|
|
|
$
|
64,867
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
24,406
|
|
|
|
28,977
|
|
|
|
28,256
|
|
|
|
28,836
|
|
|
|
28,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income before provision for loan losses
|
|
|
62,089
|
|
|
|
56,591
|
|
|
|
46,793
|
|
|
|
36,866
|
|
|
|
36,461
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
10,084
|
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
52,005
|
|
|
|
47,553
|
|
|
|
41,711
|
|
|
|
35,424
|
|
|
|
36,226
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
6,842
|
|
|
|
5,393
|
|
|
|
6,153
|
|
|
|
9,478
|
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
38,684
|
|
|
|
34,254
|
|
|
|
24,852
|
|
|
|
35,950
|
|
|
|
23,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
20,163
|
|
|
|
18,692
|
|
|
|
23,012
|
|
|
|
8,952
|
|
|
|
17,008
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
6,370
|
|
|
|
6,618
|
|
|
|
7,181
|
|
|
|
(1,555
|
)
|
|
|
6,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
13,793
|
|
|
$
|
12,074
|
|
|
$
|
15,831
|
|
|
$
|
10,507
|
|
|
$
|
10,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share basic and diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding(1)
|
|
|
41,387,106
|
|
|
|
42,405,774
|
|
|
|
43,133,856
|
|
|
|
43,076,586
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
41,669,006
|
|
|
|
42,532,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net loss per share in 2007 is calculated for the period that the
Companys shares of common stock were outstanding
(November 8, 2007, through December 31, 2007). The net
loss for this period was $1,500,000. |
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on assets (ratio of net income to average total assets)(1)
|
|
|
0.65
|
%
|
|
|
0.64
|
%
|
|
|
1.01
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
0.80
|
%
|
Return on equity (ratio of net income to average equity)(1)
|
|
|
3.46
|
%
|
|
|
3.09
|
%
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
|
5.27
|
%
|
|
|
7.01
|
%
|
Interest rate spread(1)(3)
|
|
|
2.78
|
%
|
|
|
2.66
|
%
|
|
|
2.37
|
%
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
|
|
2.40
|
%
|
Net interest margin(1)(2)
|
|
|
3.10
|
%
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
|
|
3.13
|
%
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
|
|
2.81
|
%
|
Dividend payout ratio(6)
|
|
|
23.98
|
%
|
|
|
24.54
|
%
|
|
|
4.66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio(1)(4)
|
|
|
56.12
|
%
|
|
|
55.26
|
%
|
|
|
46.94
|
%
|
|
|
77.57
|
%
|
|
|
58.01
|
%
|
Non-interest expense to average total assets(1)
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
|
|
2.66
|
%
|
|
|
1.77
|
%
|
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing
liabilities
|
|
|
125.52
|
%
|
|
|
130.44
|
%
|
|
|
136.94
|
%
|
|
|
123.33
|
%
|
|
|
118.89
|
%
|
Average equity to average total assets
|
|
|
18.81
|
%
|
|
|
20.82
|
%
|
|
|
23.84
|
%
|
|
|
14.73
|
%
|
|
|
11.47
|
%
|
Asset Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
2.72
|
%
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
Non-performing loans to total loans
|
|
|
7.36
|
%
|
|
|
5.73
|
%
|
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
|
2.32
|
%
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
35.83
|
%
|
|
|
36.86
|
%
|
|
|
91.07
|
%
|
|
|
57.31
|
%
|
|
|
70.70
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
2.64
|
%
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
|
|
1.49
|
%
|
|
|
1.33
|
%
|
|
|
1.23
|
%
|
Capital Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)(5)
|
|
|
27.39
|
%
|
|
|
28.52
|
%
|
|
|
34.81
|
%
|
|
|
38.07
|
%
|
|
|
25.03
|
%
|
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)(5)
|
|
|
26.12
|
%
|
|
|
27.24
|
%
|
|
|
33.68
|
%
|
|
|
37.23
|
%
|
|
|
24.25
|
%
|
Tier I capital (to adjusted assets (OTS), average assets
FDIC)(5)
|
|
|
13.43
|
%
|
|
|
14.35
|
%
|
|
|
15.98
|
%
|
|
|
18.84
|
%
|
|
|
12.38
|
%
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of full service offices
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Full time equivalent employees
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
2010 performance ratios include a $1.8 million charge
($1.2 million after-tax) related to costs associated with
the Companys postponed second-step offering, and a
$738,000 benefit related to the elimination of deferred tax
liabilities associated with a change in New York state tax law.
2009 performance ratios include a $770,000 expense ($462,000
after-tax) related to a special FDIC deposit insurance
assessment. 2008 performance ratios include a $2.5 million
tax-exempt gain from the death of an officer and $463,000
($292,000, net of tax) in costs associated with the Banks
conversion to a new core processing system that was completed in
January 2009. 2007 performance ratios include the after-tax
effect of: a charge of $7.8 million due to the
Companys contribution to the Northfield Bank Foundation; a
gain of $2.4 million as a result of the sale of two branch
locations, and associated deposit relationships; net interest
income of approximately $800,000 (after-tax), for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as it relates to short-term investment
returns earned on subscription proceeds (net of interest paid
during the stock offering); and the reversal of state and local
tax liabilities of approximately $4.5 million, net of
federal taxes. 2006 performance ratios include a $931,000
(after-tax) charge related to a supplemental retirement
agreement entered into by the Company with its former president. |
|
(2) |
|
The net interest margin represents net interest income as a
percent of average interest-earning assets for the period. |
|
(3) |
|
The interest rate spread represents the difference between the
weighted-average yield on interest earning assets and the
weighted-average costs of interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
The efficiency ratio represents non-interest expense divided by
the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. |
|
(5) |
|
Capital ratios are presented for Northfield Bank only. Ratios
for 2006 were determined pursuant to Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation regulations. Beginning November 6, 2007,
Northfield Bank became subject to the capital requirements under
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations, while the capital
regulations of these two agencies are substantially similar,
they are not identical. |
|
(6) |
|
Dividend payout ratio is calculated as total dividends declared
for the year (excluding dividends waived by Northfield Bancorp,
MHC) divided by net income for the year. |
49
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
and the Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report
(collectively, the Financial Statements).
Overview
On November 7, 2007, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. completed its
initial stock offering whereby the Company sold
19,265,316 shares of common stock, for a price of $10.00
per share. The transaction closed at the adjusted maximum level
of shares permitted by the offering. The shares sold represented
43.0% of the shares of the Companys common stock
outstanding following the stock offering. The Company also
contributed 2.0% of the shares of our outstanding common stock,
or 896,061 shares, and $3.0 million in cash, to the
Northfield Bank Foundation, a charitable foundation established
by Northfield Bank. Northfield Bancorp, MHC, the Companys
federally chartered mutual holding company parent, owns 57% of
the Companys outstanding common stock as of
December 31, 2010.
Net income amounted to $13.8 million for 2010, as compared
to $12.1 million for 2009. For 2010, our return on average
assets and average shareholders equity were 0.65% and
3.46%, respectively, as compared to 0.64% and 3.09% for 2009.
The increases in our return on average equity and average assets
were due primarily to the increase in our net income during 2010
as compared to 2009. Net income for 2010 included an after-tax
charge of $1.2 million related to costs associated with the
Companys postponed, second-step offering, and a $738,000
benefit related to the elimination of deferred tax liabilities
associated with a change in New York State tax laws. Net income
in 2009 included a $462,000 after-tax charge related to a
special FDIC deposit insurance assessment.
We grew our assets by 12.2% to $2.247 billion at
December 31, 2010, from $2.002 billion at
December 31, 2009. The increase in total assets reflected
increases in securities of $111.5 million, 9.8%, and loans
held for investment, net, of $98.3 million, or 13.5%. In
addition, bank owned life insurance increased
$31.1 million, primarily resulting from the purchase of
$28.8 million of insurance policies during the year ended
December 31, 2010, coupled with $2.3 million of income
earned on bank owned life insurance for the year ended
December 31, 2010. The increase in our total assets during
2010 was funded primarily by an increase in customer deposits
and borrowings. Deposits increased $56.0 million to
$1.373 billion at December 31, 2010, from
$1.317 billion at December 31, 2009. The increase in
deposits was attributable to growth in transaction and savings
accounts. Borrowed funds increased $111.8 million to
$391.2 million at December 31, 2010, from
$279.4 million at December 31, 2009.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that involve
significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially
result in materially different results under different
assumptions and conditions. We believe that the most critical
accounting policies upon which our financial condition and
results of operation depend, and which involve the most complex
subjective decisions or assessments, are the following:
Allowance for Loan Losses, Impaired Loans, and Other Real
Estate Owned. The allowance for loan losses is
the estimated amount considered necessary to cover probable and
reasonably estimable credit losses inherent in the loan
portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is
established through the provision for loan losses that is
charged against income. In determining the allowance for loan
losses, we make significant estimates and judgments. The
determination of the allowance for loan losses is considered a
critical accounting policy by management because of the high
degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions
used, and the potential for changes in the economic environment
that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded
allowance for loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses has been determined in accordance
with GAAP. We are responsible for the timely and periodic
determination of the amount of the allowance required. We
believe that our
50
allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover identifiable
losses, as well as estimated losses inherent in our portfolio
for which certain losses are probable but not specifically
identifiable.
Management performs a formal quarterly evaluation of the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. The analysis of the
allowance for loan losses has a component for impaired loan
losses, and a component for general loan losses, including
unallocated reserves. Management has defined an impaired loan to
be a loan for which it is probable, based on current
information, that the Company will not collect all amounts due
in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
We have defined the population of impaired loans to be all
non-accrual loans with an outstanding balance of $500,000 or
greater, and all loans subject to a troubled debt restructuring.
Impaired loans are individually assessed to determine that the
loans carrying value is not in excess of the estimated
fair value of the collateral (less cost to sell), if the loan is
collateral dependent, or the present value of the expected
future cash flows, if the loan is not collateral dependent.
Management performs a detailed evaluation of each impaired loan
and generally obtains updated appraisals as part of the
evaluation. In addition, management adjusts estimated fair
values down to appropriately consider recent market conditions,
our willingness to accept lower sales price to effect a quick
sale, and costs to dispose of any supporting collateral.
Determining the estimated fair value of underlying collateral
(and related costs to sell) can be difficult in illiquid real
estate markets and is subject to significant assumptions and
estimates. Management employs an independent third party expert
in appraisal preparation and review to ascertain the
reasonableness of updated appraisals. Projecting the expected
cash flows under troubled debt restructurings is inherently
subjective and requires, among other things, an evaluation of
the borrowers current and projected financial condition.
Actual results may be significantly different than our
projections, and our established allowance for loan losses on
these loans, and could have a material effect on our financial
results.
The second component of the allowance for loan losses is the
general loss allocation. This assessment is performed on a
portfolio basis, excluding impaired and trouble debt
restructured loans, with loans being grouped into similar risk
characteristics, primarily loan type,
loan-to-value
(if collateral dependent) and internal credit risk rating. We
apply an estimated loss rate to each loan group. The loss rates
applied are based on our loss experience as adjusted for our
qualitative assessment of relevant changes related to:
underwriting standards; delinquency trends; collection,
charge-off and recovery practices; the nature or volume of the
loan group; lending staff; concentration of loan type; current
economic conditions; and other relevant factors considered
appropriate by management. In evaluating the estimated loss
factors to be utilized for each loan group, management also
reviews actual loss history over an extended period of time as
reported by the OTS and FDIC for institutions both nationally
and in our market area, for periods that are believed to have
been under similar economic conditions. This evaluation is
inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may
be susceptible to significant revisions based on changes in
economic and real estate market conditions. Actual loan losses
may be significantly different than the allowance for loan
losses we have established, and could have a material effect on
our financial results. The Company also maintains an unallocated
component related to the general loss allocation. Management
does not target a specific unallocated percentage of the total
general allocation, or total allowance for loan losses. The
primary purpose of the unallocated component is to account for
the inherent imprecision of the loss estimation process related
primarily to periodic updating of appraisals on impaired loans,
as well as periodic updating of commercial loan credit risk
ratings by loan officers and the Companys internal credit
audit process. Generally, management will establish higher
levels of unallocated reserves between independent credit
audits, and between appraisal reviews for larger impaired loans.
Adjustments to the provision for loans due to the receipt of
updated appraisals is mitigated by managements quarterly
review of real estate market index changes, and reviews of
property valuation trends noted in current appraisals being
received on other impaired and unimpaired loans. These changes
in indicators of value are applied to impaired loans that are
awaiting updated appraisals.
This quarterly process is performed by the accounting
department, in conjunction with the credit administration
department, and approved by the Senior Vice President (SVP) and
Controller. The Chief Financial Officer performs a final review
of the calculation. All supporting documentation with regard to
51
the evaluation process is maintained by the accounting
department. Each quarter a summary of the allowance for loan
losses is presented by the SVP and Controller to the audit
committee of the board of directors.
We have a concentration of loans secured by real property
located in New York and New Jersey. As a substantial amount of
our loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate, appraisals
of the underlying value of property securing loans are critical
in determining the amount of the allowance required for specific
loans. Assumptions for appraisal valuations are instrumental in
determining the value of properties. Overly optimistic
assumptions or negative changes to assumptions could
significantly impact the valuation of a property securing a loan
and the related allowance determined. The assumptions supporting
such appraisals are reviewed by management and an independent
third party appraiser to determine that the resulting values
reasonably reflect amounts realizable on the collateral. Based
on the composition of our loan portfolio, we believe the primary
risks are increases in interest rates, a decline in the economy
generally, and a decline in real estate market values in New
York or New Jersey. Any one or a combination of these events may
adversely affect our loan portfolio resulting in delinquencies,
increased loan losses, and future loan loss provisions.
Although we believe we have established and maintained the
allowance for loan losses at adequate levels, changes may be
necessary if future economic or other conditions differ
substantially from our estimation of the current operating
environment. Although management uses the information available,
the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate
that is subject to significant judgment and short-term change.
In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision, as an integral
part of their examination process, will periodically review our
allowance for loan losses. Such agency may require us to
recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments
about information available to them at the time of their
examination.
We also maintain an allowance for estimated losses on
off-balance sheet credit risks related to loan commitments and
standby letters of credit. Management utilizes a methodology
similar to its allowance for loan loss methodology to estimate
losses on these items. The allowance for estimated credit losses
on these items is included in other liabilities and any changes
to the allowance are recorded as a component of other
non-interest expense.
Real estate acquired by us as a result of foreclosure or by deed
in lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned. When
the Company acquires other real estate owned, it generally
obtains a current appraisal to substantiate the net carrying
value of the asset. The asset is recorded at the lower of cost
or estimated fair value, establishing a new cost basis. Holding
costs and declines in estimated fair value result in charges to
expense after acquisition.
Goodwill. Business combinations accounted for
under the acquisition method require us to record as assets on
our financial statements goodwill, an unidentifiable intangible
asset which is equal to the excess of the purchase price which
we pay for another company over the estimated fair value of the
net assets acquired. Net assets acquired include identifiable
intangible assets such as core deposit intangibles and
non-compete agreements. We evaluate goodwill for impairment
annually on December 31, and more often if circumstances
warrant, and we will reduce its carrying value through a charge
to earnings if impairment exists. Future events or changes in
the estimates that we use to determine the carrying value of our
goodwill or which otherwise adversely affect its value could
have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. As
of December 31, 2010, goodwill had a carrying value of
$16.2 million.
Securities Valuation and Impairment. Our
securities portfolio is comprised of mortgage-backed securities
and to a lesser extent corporate bonds, agency bonds, and mutual
funds. Our
available-for-sale
securities portfolio is carried at estimated fair value, with
any unrealized gains or losses, net of taxes, reported as
accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in
stockholders equity. Our trading securities portfolio is
reported at estimated fair value. Our
held-to-maturity
securities portfolio, consisting of debt securities for which we
have a positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, is
carried at amortized cost. We conduct a quarterly review and
evaluation of the
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
securities portfolios to determine if the estimated fair value
of any security has declined below its
52
amortized cost, and whether such decline is
other-than-temporary.
If such decline is deemed
other-than-temporary,
we adjust the cost basis of the security by writing down the
security to estimated fair value through a charge to current
period operations. The estimated fair values of our securities
are primarily affected by changes in interest rates, credit
quality, and market liquidity.
Management is responsible for determining the estimated fair
value of the Companys securities. In determining estimated
fair values, management utilizes the services of an independent
third party recognized as a specialist in pricing securities.
The independent pricing service utilizes market prices of same
or similar securities whenever such prices are available. Prices
involving distressed sellers are not utilized in determining
fair value. Where necessary, the independent third party pricing
service estimates fair value using models employing techniques
such as discounted cash flow analyses. The assumptions used in
these models typically include assumptions for interest rates,
credit losses, and prepayments, utilizing observable market
data, where available. Where the market price of the same or
similar securities is not available, the valuation becomes more
subjective and involves a high degree of judgment. On a
quarterly basis, we review the pricing methodologies utilized by
the independent third party pricing service for each security
type. In addition, we compare securities prices to a second
independent pricing service that is utilized as part of our
asset liability risk management process. At December 31,
2010, and for each quarter end in 2010, all securities were
priced by an independent third party pricing service, and
management made no adjustment to the prices received.
Determining that a securitys decline in estimated fair
value is
other-than-temporary
is inherently subjective, and becomes increasing difficult as it
relates to mortgage-backed securities that are not guaranteed by
the U.S. Government, or a U.S. Government Sponsored
Enterprise (e.g., Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac). In performing our
evaluation of securities in an unrealized loss position, we
consider among other things, the severity, and duration of time
that the security has been in an unrealized loss position and
the credit quality of the issuer. As it relates to
mortgage-backed securities not guaranteed by the
U.S. Government, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac, we perform a
review of the key underlying loan collateral risk
characteristics including, among other things, origination
dates, interest rate levels, composition of variable and fixed
rates, reset dates (including related pricing indices), current
loan to original collateral values, locations of collateral,
delinquency status of loans, and current credit support. In
addition, for securities experiencing declines in estimated fair
values of over 10%, as compared to its amortized cost,
management also reviews published historical and expected
prepayment speeds, underlying loan collateral default rates, and
related historical and expected losses on the disposal of the
underlying collateral on defaulted loans. This evaluation is
inherently subjective as it requires estimates of future events,
many of which are difficult to predict. Actual results could be
significantly different than our estimates and could have a
material effect on our financial results.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock Impairment
Assessment. Northfield Bank is a member of the
Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of 12 regional
Federal Home Loan Banks. As a member of the Federal Home Loan
Bank of New York (FHLB-NY), Northfield Bank is required to
acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB-NY in an
amount determined by a membership investment
component and an activity-based investment
component. As of December 31, 2010, Northfield Bank was in
compliance with its ownership requirement. At December 31,
2010, Northfield Bank held $9.8 million of FHLB-NY common
stock. In performing our evaluation of our investment in FHLB-NY
stock, on a quarterly basis, management reviews the most recent
financial statements of the FHLB of New York and determines
whether there have been any adverse changes to its capital
position as compared to the trailing period. In addition,
management reviews the FHLB-NYs most recent
Presidents Report in order to determine whether or not a
dividend has been declared for the current reporting period.
Furthermore, management obtains the credit rating of the FHLB-NY
from an accredited credit rating industry to ensure that no
downgrades have occurred. At December 31, 2010, it was
determined by management that the Banks investment in FHLB
stock was not impaired.
Deferred Income Taxes. We use the asset and
liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
53
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. If it is
determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax
assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is
established. We consider the determination of this valuation
allowance to be a critical accounting policy because of the need
to exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and
timing of recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets,
including projections of future taxable income. These judgments
and estimates are reviewed quarterly as regulatory and business
factors change. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
may be required if the amounts of taxes recoverable through loss
carry backs decline, or if we project lower levels of future
taxable income. Such a valuation allowance would be established
and any subsequent changes to such allowance would require an
adjustment to income tax expense that could adversely affect our
operating results.
Stock Based Compensation. We recognize the
cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of
equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value.
We estimate the per share fair value of options on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using
assumptions for the expected dividend yield, expected stock
price volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option
term. These assumptions are based on our judgments regarding
future option exercise experience and market conditions. These
assumptions are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties,
and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. The
Black-Scholes option pricing model also contains certain
inherent limitations when applied to options that are not traded
on public markets.
The per share fair value of options is highly sensitive to
changes in assumptions. In general, the per share fair value of
options will move in the same direction as changes in the
expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and
expected option term, and in the opposite direction of changes
in the expected dividend yield. For example, the per share fair
value of options will generally increase as expected stock price
volatility increases, risk-free interest rate increases,
expected option term increases and expected dividend yield
decreases. The use of different assumptions or different option
pricing models could result in materially different per share
fair values of options.
As our Companys stock does not have a significant amount
of historical price volatility, we utilized the historical stock
price volatility of a peer group when pricing stock options.
Comparison
of Financial Condition at December 31, 2010 and
2009
Total assets increased $244.9 million, or 12.2%, to
$2.2 billion at December 31, 2010, from
$2.0 billion at December 31, 2009. The increase in
total assets reflected increases in loans held for investment,
net, of $98.3 million, or 13.5%, and securities of
$111.5 million, or 9.8%. In addition, bank owned life
insurance increased $31.1 million, primarily resulting from
the purchase of $28.8 million of insurance policies during
the year ended December 31, 2010, coupled with
$2.3 million of income earned on bank owned life insurance
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Cash and cash equivalents increased modestly, up
$1.3 million, or 3.1%, to $43.9 million at
December 31, 2010, from $42.5 million at
December 31, 2009. We continue to deploy funds into higher
yielding investments such as loans and securities with risk and
return characteristics that we deem acceptable.
Securities
available-for-sale
increased $112.5 million, or 9.9%, to $1.2 billion at
December 31, 2010, from $1.1 billion at
December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable
to purchases of $916.5 million, partially offset by a
decrease of $2.3 million in net unrealized gains,
maturities and paydowns of $581.5 million, and sales of
$221.2 million. The Company routinely sells securities when
market pricing presents, in managements assessment, an
economic benefit that outweighs holding such security, and when
smaller balance securities become cost prohibitive to carry. The
securities purchases were funded primarily by increased
deposits, pay-downs, sales, and maturities of securities.
54
Securities
held-to-maturity
decreased $1.7 million, or 24.9%, to $5.1 million at
December 31, 2010, from $6.7 million at
December 31, 2009. The decrease was attributable to
maturities and paydowns during the year ended December 31,
2010.
The Companys securities portfolio totaled
$1.3 billion at December 31, 2010, as compared to
$1.1 billion at December 31, 2009, an increase of
$111.5 million, or 9.8%. At December 31, 2010,
$982.9 million of the portfolio consisted of residential
mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae,
Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae. The Company also held residential
mortgage-backed securities not guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie
Mac, or Ginnie Mae, referred to as private label
securities. The private label securities had an amortized
cost of $93.6 million and an estimated fair value of
$97.3 million at December 31, 2010. These private
label securities were in a net unrealized gain position of
$3.7 million at December 31, 2010, consisting of gross
unrealized gains of $4.5 million and gross unrealized
losses of $788,000. In addition to the above mortgage-backed
securities, the Company held $121.8 million in securities
issued by corporate entities which were all rated investment
grade (A- or better) at December 31, 2010.
Of the $97.3 million of private label securities, two
securities with an estimated fair value of $10.1 million
(amortized cost of $10.9 million) were rated less than AAA
at December 31, 2010. Of the two securities, one had an
estimated fair value of $4.4 million (amortized cost of
$4.4 million) and was rated CC, and the other had an
estimated fair value of $5.7 million (amortized cost of
$6.5 million) and was rated Caa2. The ratings of the
securities detailed above represent the lowest rating for each
security received from the rating agencies of Moodys,
Standard & Poors, and Fitch. During the quarter
ended September 30, 2010, the Company recognized
other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $962,000 on the $5.7 million security
that was rated Caa2. Since management does not have the intent
to sell the security, and believes it is more likely than not
that the Company will not be required to sell the security,
before its anticipated recovery, the credit component of
$154,000 was recognized in earnings for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, and the non-credit component of
$808,000 was recorded as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income, net of tax. The Company continues to
receive principal and interest payments in accordance with the
contractual terms of each of these securities. Management has
evaluated, among other things, delinquency status, location of
collateral, estimated prepayment speeds, and the estimated
default rates and loss severity in liquidating the underlying
collateral for each of these securities. As a result of
managements evaluation of these securities, the Company
believes that unrealized losses at December 31, 2010, are
temporary, and as such, are recorded as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax.
Loans
held-for-investment,
net of deferred loan fees, increased $98.3 million, or
13.5%, to $827.6 million at December 31, 2010, from
$729.3 million at December 31, 2009. We continue to
focus on originating multifamily loans to the extent such loan
demand exists while meeting our underwriting standards.
Multi-family real estate loans increased $105.2 million, or
59.0%, to $283.6 million, from $178.4 million at
December 31, 2009. Commercial real estate loans increased
$11.5 million, or 3.5%, to $339.3 million, insurance
premium loans increased $4.1 million, or 10.2%, to
$44.5 million, and home equity loans increased
$2.0 million, or 7.7%, to $28.1 million at
December 31, 2010. These increases were partially offset by
decreases in residential, construction and land, and commercial
and industrial loans.
Bank owned life insurance increased $31.1 million, or
71.0%, to $74.8 million at December 31, 2010. The
increase resulted from the purchase of $28.8 million of
insurance policies during the year ended December 31, 2010,
coupled with $2.3 million of income earned on bank owned
life insurance for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost, increased
$3.4 million, or 52.4%, to $9.8 million at
December 31, 2010, from $6.4 million at
December 31, 2009. This increase was attributable to an
increase in borrowings outstanding with the Federal Home Loan
Bank of New York over the same time period.
Premises and equipment, net, increased $3.4 million, or
26.7%, to $16.1 million at December 31, 2010, from
$12.7 million at December 31, 2009. This increase was
primarily attributable to leasehold improvements made to new
branches and the renovation of existing branches.
55
Other real estate owned decreased $1.8 million, or 91.2%,
to $171,000 at December 31, 2010, from $1.9 million at
December 31, 2009. This decrease was attributable to
downward valuation adjustments of $146,000 recorded against the
carrying balances of the properties during 2010, reflecting
deterioration in estimated fair values, coupled with the sale of
other real estate owned properties.
Other assets increased $3.1 million, or 20.9%, to
$18.1 million at December 31, 2010, from
$14.9 million at December 31, 2009. The increase in
other assets was primarily attributable to an increase in net
deferred tax assets, partially offset by amortization of prepaid
FDIC assessment.
Deposits increased $56.0 million, or 4.3%, to
$1.4 billion at December 31, 2010, from
$1.3 billion at December 31, 2009. The increase in
deposits for the year ended December 31, 2010, was due in
part to an increase of $13.7 million in short-term
certificates of deposit originated through the
CDARS®
Network. We utilize this funding supply as a cost effective
alternative to other short-term funding sources. In addition,
money market deposits and transaction accounts increased
$98.9 million and $14.7 million, respectively, from
December 31, 2009, to December 31, 2010. These
increases were partially offset by a decrease of
$31.4 million in savings accounts and a decrease of
$40.0 million in certificates of deposit (issued by the
Bank) over the same time period. The Company continues to focus
on its marketing and pricing of its products, which it believes
promotes longer-term customer relationships.
Borrowings, consisting primarily of Federal Home Loan Bank
advances and repurchase agreements, increased
$111.8 million, or 40.0%, to $391.2 million at
December 31, 2010, from $279.4 million at
December 31, 2009. The increase in borrowings was primarily
the result of the Company increasing longer-term borrowings,
taking advantage of, and locking in, lower interest rates,
partially offset by maturities during the year ended
December 31, 2010.
Accrued expenses and other liabilities increased
$72.0 million, to $85.7 million at December 31,
2010, from $13.7 million at December 31, 2009. The
increase was primarily a result of $70.7 million of due to
securities brokers which resulted from securities purchases
occurring prior to December 31, 2010, and settling shortly
after the year end.
Total stockholders equity increased to $396.7 million
at December 31, 2010, from $391.5 million at
December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable
to net income of $13.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010, and an increase of $3.4 million in
additional paid-in capital primarily related to the recognition
of compensation expense associated with equity awards. These
increases were partially offset by $8.2 million in stock
repurchases, net of stock options exercised, consisting of
614,322 shares at an average cost of $13.37 per share, the
declaration and payment of approximately $3.3 million in
cash dividends, and a decrease in accumulated other
comprehensive income of $1.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
On October 27, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company
authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the
Company intends to repurchase up to 2,177,033 shares,
representing approximately 5% of its then-outstanding shares.
The timing of the repurchases will depend on certain factors,
including but not limited to, market conditions and prices, the
Companys liquidity and capital requirements, and
alternative uses of capital. Any repurchased shares will be held
as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate
purposes. The Company is conducting such repurchases in
accordance with a
Rule 10b5-1
trading plan. Through December 31, 2010, the Company had
repurchased 224,567 shares of common stock at an average
cost of $12.76 per share under this plan. As of
December 31, 2010, the Company has repurchased (under its
current and prior repurchase plans) 2,308,511 shares of its
stock at an average price of $12.06 per share.
Comparison
of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2010
and 2009
Net Income. Net income increased
$1.7 million or 14.2%, to $13.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010, from $12.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009, due primarily to an increase
of $5.5 million in net interest income, an increase of
$1.4 million in non-interest income, and a decrease of
$248,000 in income tax expense, partially offset by an increase
of $4.4 million in non-interest expense, and an increase of
$1.0 million in provision for loan losses.
56
Interest Income. Interest income increased by
$927,000, or 1.1%, to $86.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010, as compared to $85.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase was
primarily the result of an increase in average interest-earning
assets of $213.0 million, or 11.9%. The increase in average
interest-earning assets was primarily attributable to an
increase in average loans of $121.7 million, or 18.6%, an
increase in average mortgage-backed securities of
$16.2 million, or 1.8%, and an increase in securities
(other than mortgage-backed securities) of $112.9 million,
or 88.9%, partially offset by a decrease in average
interest-earning deposits of $37.2 million, or 44.7%. The
effect of the increase in average interest-earning assets was
partially offset by a decrease in the yield earned to 4.31% for
the year ended December 31, 2010, from 4.77% for the year
ended December 31, 2009. The rates earned on all asset
categories, other than loans, decreased due to the general
decline in market interest rates for these asset types. The rate
earned on loans increased from 5.95% for the year ended
December 31, 2009, to 6.02% for the year ended
December 31, 2010, primarily as a result of fewer loans
migrating to non-accrual status during the 2010, as compared to
the amount of loans that migrated to non-accrual status during
2009.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$4.6 million, or 15.8%, to $24.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010, from $29.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was attributable
to a decrease in interest expense on deposits of
$4.6 million, or 25.5%, partially offset by a modest
increase in interest expense on borrowings of $70,000, or 0.7%.
The decrease in interest expense on deposits was attributable to
a decrease in the cost of interest-bearing deposits of
62 basis points, or 36.7%, to 1.07% for the year ended
December 31, 2010, from 1.69% for the year ended
December 31, 2009, reflecting lower market interest rates
for short-term deposits. The decrease in the cost of deposits
was partially offset by an increase of $190.3 million, or
17.7%, in average interest-bearing deposits outstanding. The
increase in interest expense on borrowings was primarily
attributable to an increase of $33.3 million, or 11.2%, in
average borrowings outstanding, partially offset by a decrease
of 34 basis points, or 9.4%, in the cost of borrowings,
reflecting lower market interest rates for borrowed funds.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income
increased $5.5 million, or 9.7%, due primarily to interest
earning assets increasing $213.0 million, or 11.9%,
partially offset by a decrease in the net interest margin of six
basis points, or 1.9%, over the prior year. The net interest
margin decreased for the year ended December 31, 2010, as
the average yield earned on interest earning assets decreased,
which was partially offset by a decrease in the average rate
paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The general decline in
yields was due to the overall low interest rate environment and
was driven by decreases in yields earned on mortgage-backed
securities, as principal repayments were reinvested into lower
yielding securities. The decline in yield on interest-earning
assets was also due to declining yields on other securities and
interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions. These
decreases were partially offset by an increase in yield earned
on loans due primarily to fewer loans migrating to non-accrual
status during 2010, as compared to the amount of loans that
migrated to non-accrual status during 2009. The increase in
average interest earning assets was due primarily to an increase
in average loans outstanding of $121.7 million, other
securities of $112.9 million, and mortgage-backed
securities of $16.2 million, being partially offset by
decreases in interest-earning assets in other financial
institutions. Other securities consist primarily of
investment-grade corporate bonds, and government-sponsored
enterprise bonds.
Provision for Loan Losses. We recorded a
provision for loan losses of $10.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $1.1 million,
or 11.6%, from the $9.0 million provision recorded for the
year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in the provision
for loan losses was due primarily to increases in total loans,
the change in the composition of our loan portfolio, and
increases in general loss factors, due primarily to higher
levels of charge-offs. The increases in the general loss factors
utilized in managements estimate of credit losses inherent
in the loan portfolio were also the result of continued
deterioration of the local economy. Net charge-offs for the year
ended December 31, 2010, were $3.7 million, as
compared to $2.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income
increased $1.4 million, or 26.9%, primarily as a result of
an increase of $962,000 in gains on securities transactions, net
for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the
year ended December 31, 2009. The Company recognized
$1.9 million in gains on securities transactions during the
year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $891,000 in
gains on securities
57
transactions during the year ended December 31, 2009.
Securities gains during the year ended December 31, 2010,
included gross realized gains of $1.3 million primarily from the
sale of mortgage-backed securities, coupled with securities
gains of $597,000 related to the Companys trading
portfolio. During the year ended December 31, 2009,
securities gains included gross realized gains of $299,000
primarily from the sale of mortgage-backed securities, coupled
with securities gains of $592,000 related to the Companys
trading portfolio. The trading portfolio is utilized to fund the
Companys deferred compensation obligation to certain
employees and directors of the Company. The participants of this
plan, at their election, defer a portion of their compensation.
Gains and losses on trading securities have no effect on net
income since participants benefit from, and bear the full risk
of, changes in the trading securities market values. Therefore,
the Company records an equal and offsetting amount in
non-interest expense, reflecting the change in the
Companys obligations under the plan. The Company routinely
sells securities when market pricing presents, in
managements assessment, an economic benefit that outweighs
holding such security, and when smaller balance securities
become cost prohibitive to carry.
Non-interest income also was positively affected by a $524,000,
or 29.9%, increase in income on bank owned life insurance for
the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2009, due to the purchase of
$28.8 million of insurance policies during the year ended
December 31, 2010. The Company also recognized
approximately $197,000 of income on the sale of fixed assets
during the year ended December 31, 2010.
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense
increased $4.4 million, or 12.9%, for the year ended
December 31, 2010, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2009, due primarily to the expensing of
approximately $1.8 million in costs incurred on the
Companys postponed, second-step stock offering, and an
increase of $2.2 million, or 12.8%, in compensation and
employee benefits expense. Compensation and employee benefits
expense increased primarily due to increases in full-time
equivalent employees related to additional branch and operations
personnel, as well as incremental personnel from our insurance
premium finance division formed in October 2009. Occupancy
expense increased $547,000, or 11.9%, over the same time period,
primarily due to increases in rent and amortization of leasehold
improvements relating to new branches and the renovation of
existing branches. In addition, other non-interest expense also
increased $536,000, or 15.7%, from the year ended
December 31, 2009 to the year ended December 31, 2010.
This increase is primarily attributable to operating expenses of
the insurance premium finance division. These increases in
non-interest expense were partially offset by a decrease of
$515,000 in FDIC insurance expense. FDIC insurance expense for
the year ended December 31, 2009 included $770,000 related
to an FDIC special assessment.
Income Tax Expense. The Company recorded a
provision for income taxes of $6.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010, as compared to $6.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009. The effective tax
rate for the year ended December 31, 2010, was 31.6%, as
compared to 35.4% for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily the result of
the reversal of deferred tax liabilities related to state bad
debt reserves of approximately $738,000 resulting from the
enactment of new State of New York tax laws during the year
ended December 31, 2010, and higher levels of tax exempt
income from bank owned life insurance.
Comparison
of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2009
and 2008
Net Income. Net income decreased
$3.8 million or 23.7%, to $12.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from $15.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. Included in 2008 net
income was a $2.5 million tax-exempt gain from the death of
an officer and $463,000 ($292,000, net of tax) in costs
associated with the Banks conversion to a new core
processing system that was completed in January 2009.
Interest Income. Interest income increased by
$10.5 million, or 14.0%, to $85.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $75.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase was
primarily the result of an increase in average interest-earning
assets of $298.9 million, or 20.0%, partially offset by a
decrease in the average rate earned of 26 basis points, or
5.2%, to 4.77% for the year ended December 31, 2009, from
5.03% for the year ended December 31, 2008.
58
Interest income on loans increased $7.3 million, or 23.0%,
to $38.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
from $31.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2008. The average balance of loans increased
$149.9 million, or 29.7%, to $653.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009, from $503.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008, reflecting our current
efforts to grow our multifamily and commercial real estate loan
portfolios, and the purchase of an insurance premium loan
portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2009. The yield on our
loan portfolio decreased 32 basis points, or 5.1%, to 5.95%
for the year ended December 31, 2009, from 6.27% for the
year ended December 31, 2008, primarily as a result of
decreases in interest rates on new originations and on our
adjustable-rate loans, due to the lower interest rate
environment in 2009, and the effect of non-accrual loans.
Interest income on mortgage-backed securities increased
$4.2 million, or 11.0%, to $42.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from $38.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The increase resulted from an
increase in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities of
$76.4 million, or 9.0%, to $920.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from $844.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The increase is due primarily
to the implementation of leveraging strategies within board
approved risk parameters. The yield we earned on mortgage-backed
securities increased eight basis points, or 1.8%, to 4.59% for
the year ended December 31, 2009, from 4.51% for the year
ended December 31, 2008. The increase in rate earned was
due primarily to paydowns on lower yielding securities and the
purchase of higher yielding private-label mortgage-backed
securities.
Interest income on other securities increased $1.9 million,
or 139.1%, to $3.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, from $1.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008. The increase resulted from an
increase in the average balance of other securities, primarily
corporate bonds, of $91.0 million, or 252.9%, to
$127.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
from $36.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2008, partially offset by a 121 basis point decrease in the
yield on this portfolio, to 2.54% for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The increase in other securities related
primarily to the purchase of shorter-term bonds with relatively
low interest rates due to the interest rate environment in 2009.
Interest income on deposits in other financial institutions
decreased $2.6 million, or 76.2%, to $801,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from $3.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The average balance of
deposits in other financial institutions decreased
$14.1 million, or 14.5%, to $83.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from $97.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The yield on deposits in
other financial institutions decreased 250 basis points for
the year ended December 31, 2009, from 3.46% for the year
ended December 31, 2008, primarily due to the continued
general decline in the interest rate environment in 2009.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased
$721,000, or 2.6%, to $29.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, from $28.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008. The increase resulted from an
increase of $283.5 million, or 26.0%, in the average
balance of interest-bearing liabilities being partially offset
by a decrease in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities
of 48 basis points, or 18.5%, to 2.11% for the year ended
December 31, 2009, from 2.59% for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits decreased
$308,000, or 1.7%, to $18.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as compared to $18.5 million, for
the year ended December 31, 2008. This decrease was a
result of a 59 basis point, or 25.9%, decline in the
average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits, to 1.69% for the
year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2.28% for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The rate paid on certificates
of deposit decreased 105 basis points, or 30.5%, to 2.39%
for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 3.44%,
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The rate paid on
savings, NOW, and money market accounts also decreased
25 basis points, or 18.9%, to 1.07% for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as compared to 1.32%, for the year
ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in the cost of
deposits was partially offset by an increase of
$263.3 million, or 32.4%, in the average balance of
deposits outstanding, to $1.077 billion at
December 31, 2009.
Interest expense on borrowings (repurchase agreements and other
borrowings) increased $1.0 million, or 10.6%, to
$10.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
from $9.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2008. The average balance of borrowings increased
$20.1 million, or 7.3%, to $297.4 million
59
for the year ended December 31, 2009, from
$277.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The average balance of borrowings increased due to the Company
implementing shorter-term securities leverage strategies within
board approved risk parameters in 2009. The average rate paid on
borrowings also increased 11 basis points to 3.62%, or
3.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2009, from 3.51% for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
Net Interest Income. The increase in net
interest income of $9.8 million, or 20.9%, for the year
ended December 31, 2009, was primarily the result of an
increase in average interest-earning assets of
$298.9 million, or 20.0%, and the expansion in the net
interest margin of three basis points for the reasons detailed
above.
Provision for Loan Losses. We recorded a
provision for loan losses of $9.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, and $5.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008. We had net charge-offs of
$2.4 million and $1.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in
net charge-offs in 2009 was primarily attributable to an
increase of $346,000 in charge-offs related to commercial real
estate loans and an increase of $164,000 in net charge-offs
related to multifamily real estate loans. The increased
provisioning and net charge-offs during the year ended
December 31, 2009, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2008, resulted in an allowance for loans
losses of $15.4 million, or 2.11% of total loans receivable
at December 31, 2009, compared to $8.8 million, or
1.49% of total loans receivable at December 31, 2008. The
increase in the provision for loan losses in 2009 was due to a
number of factors including an increase in total loans
outstanding, changes in composition, increases in non-accrual
loans and delinquencies, impairment losses on specific loans,
and increases in general loss factors utilized in
managements estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan
portfolio in recognition of the recessionary economic
environment and real estate market.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income
decreased $760,000, or 12.4%, to $5.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from $6.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease was due
primarily to the absence of a previously recognized
$2.5 million, nontaxable, death benefit realized on bank
owned life insurance during the year ended December 31,
2008. This was partially offset by an increase of
$2.2 million, or 167.6%, in gains on securities
transactions, net, from a loss of $1.3 million during the
year ended December 31, 2008, to a gain of $891,000
recognized during the year ended December 31, 2009. The
Company recorded net securities gains during 2009 of $299,000,
which primarily resulted from the sale of smaller balance
mortgage-backed securities. The Company routinely sells these
smaller balance securities as the cost of servicing becomes
prohibitive. Securities gains during 2009 also included $592,000
related to the Companys trading portfolio which is
utilized to fund the Companys deferred compensation
obligation to certain employees and directors in the plan. The
Company recorded securities losses of $1.3 million in 2008
in its trading portfolio. The participants of this plan, at
their election, defer a portion of their compensation. Gains and
losses on trading securities have no effect on net income since
participants benefit from, and bear the full risk of, changes in
the trading securities market values. Therefore, the
Company records an equal and offsetting amount in non-interest
expense, reflecting the change in the Companys obligations
under the plan.
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense
increased $9.4 million, or 37.8%, to $34.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, from $24.9 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008. This includes a
$2.1 million increase in FDIC deposit insurance expense for
the year ended December 31, 2009, of which approximately
$770,000 related to the FDICs special assessment
recognized in the second quarter of 2009. Non-interest expense
also increased in 2009 due to an increase of $5.2 million
in compensation and employee benefits expense, which included
$2.1 million for equity awards. The remaining increase in
employee compensation and benefits costs pertained to an
increase of approximately $1.9 million related to the
deferred compensation plan (explained in the prior paragraph),
coupled with increases in personnel, higher health care costs,
and merit and market salary adjustments effective
January 1, 2009. Non-interest expense also increased in
2009 due to higher levels of professional fees associated with
loan restructurings and collection efforts, increases in
personnel, and higher premises and equipment costs associated
with additional operations center leasehold improvements, branch
improvements, and lease payments on future branch locations.
Income Tax Expense. The Company recorded a
provision for income taxes of $6.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $7.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The effective
60
tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2009, was 35.4%,
as compared to 31.2% for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The increase in the effective tax rate was the result of a
higher percentage of pre-tax income being subject to taxation in
2009, as compared to 2008. Income on bank owned life insurance
in 2008 included a $2.5 million, nontaxable, death benefit.
Average Balances and Yields. The following
tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and
costs, and certain other information for the years indicated. No
tax-equivalent yield adjustments have been made, as we had no
tax-free interest-earning assets during the years. All average
balances are daily average balances based upon amortized costs.
Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average
balances. The yields set forth below include the effect of
deferred fees, discounts, and premiums that are amortized or
accreted to interest income or interest expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
775,404
|
|
|
$
|
46,681
|
|
|
|
6.02
|
%
|
|
$
|
653,748
|
|
|
$
|
38,889
|
|
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
|
$
|
503,897
|
|
|
$
|
31,617
|
|
|
|
6.27
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
936,991
|
|
|
|
33,306
|
|
|
|
3.55
|
|
|
|
920,785
|
|
|
|
42,256
|
|
|
|
4.59
|
|
|
|
844,435
|
|
|
|
38,072
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
239,872
|
|
|
|
6,011
|
|
|
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
126,954
|
|
|
|
3,223
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
35,977
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock
|
|
|
6,866
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
5.16
|
|
|
|
7,428
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
5.37
|
|
|
|
11,653
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
Interest-earning deposits
|
|
|
45,951
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
83,159
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
|
|
97,223
|
|
|
|
3,360
|
|
|
|
3.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
2,005,084
|
|
|
|
86,495
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
1,792,074
|
|
|
|
85,568
|
|
|
|
4.77
|
|
|
|
1,493,185
|
|
|
|
75,049
|
|
|
|
5.03
|
|
Non-interest-earning assets
|
|
|
115,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,120,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,879,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,573,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings, NOW, and money market accounts
|
|
$
|
676,334
|
|
|
|
5,119
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
566,894
|
|
|
|
6,046
|
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
|
$
|
445,382
|
|
|
|
5,866
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
590,445
|
|
|
|
8,454
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
509,610
|
|
|
|
12,168
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
367,806
|
|
|
|
12,656
|
|
|
|
3.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
1,266,779
|
|
|
|
13,573
|
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
|
|
1,076,504
|
|
|
|
18,214
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
|
|
|
813,188
|
|
|
|
18,522
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
330,693
|
|
|
|
10,833
|
|
|
|
3.28
|
|
|
|
297,365
|
|
|
|
10,763
|
|
|
|
3.62
|
|
|
|
277,227
|
|
|
|
9,734
|
|
|
|
3.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
1,597,472
|
|
|
|
24,406
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
|
|
1,373,869
|
|
|
|
28,977
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
1,090,415
|
|
|
|
28,256
|
|
|
|
2.59
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
114,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
9,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,721,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,487,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,198,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
398,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,120,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,879,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,573,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
62,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.44
|
|
Net interest-earning assets(2)
|
|
$
|
407,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
418,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
402,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.13
|
%
|
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
125.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130.44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136.94
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the
weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the
weighted average rate of interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(2) |
|
Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning
assets less total interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by
average total interest-earning assets. |
61
Rate/Volume
Analysis
The following table presents the effects of changing rates and
volumes on our net interest income for the years indicated. The
rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate
(changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column
shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in
volume multiplied by prior rate). The total column represents
the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table,
changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be
segregated, have been allocated proportionately, based on the
changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010 vs. 2009
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due to
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due to
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
7,319
|
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
|
$
|
7,792
|
|
|
$
|
8,811
|
|
|
$
|
(1,539
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,272
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
(9,708
|
)
|
|
|
(8,950
|
)
|
|
|
3,494
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
4,184
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
2,149
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
Interest-earning deposits
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
(2,132
|
)
|
|
|
(2,559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
10,615
|
|
|
|
(9,688
|
)
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
13,799
|
|
|
|
(3,280
|
)
|
|
|
10,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings, NOW and money market accounts
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
(2,767
|
)
|
|
|
(927
|
)
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
|
|
180
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
2,437
|
|
|
|
(6,151
|
)
|
|
|
(3,714
|
)
|
|
|
4,043
|
|
|
|
(4,531
|
)
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
4,277
|
|
|
|
(8,918
|
)
|
|
|
(4,641
|
)
|
|
|
4,638
|
|
|
|
(4,946
|
)
|
|
|
(308
|
)
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
4,735
|
|
|
|
(9,306
|
)
|
|
|
(4,571
|
)
|
|
|
5,360
|
|
|
|
(4,639
|
)
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income
|
|
$
|
5,880
|
|
|
$
|
(382
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,498
|
|
|
$
|
8,439
|
|
|
$
|
1,359
|
|
|
$
|
9,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
Quality
General. Maintaining loan quality historically
has been, and will continue to be, a key element of our business
strategy. We employ conservative underwriting standards for new
loan originations and maintain sound credit administration
practices while the loans are outstanding. In addition,
substantially all of our loans are secured, predominantly by
real estate. However, during the current economic recession, we
have experienced increases in delinquent and non-performing
loans. At December 31, 2010, our non-performing loans
totaled $60.9 million or 7.4% of total loans. At the same
time charge-offs have remained relatively low at 0.47% of
average loans outstanding for the year ended December 31,
2010, 0.37% for the year ended December 31, 2009, and 0.38%
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
62
Delinquent Loans and Non-performing
Loans. Non-performing loans increased
$19.1 million, or 45.6%, from $41.8 million at
December 31, 2009, to $60.9 million at
December 31, 2010. The following table details
non-performing loans at December 31, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
46,388
|
|
|
$
|
28,802
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
5,122
|
|
|
|
6,843
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
4,863
|
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
Insurance premium loans
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans:
|
|
|
59,281
|
|
|
|
41,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans delinquent 90 days or more and still accruing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to four-family residential
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans delinquent 90 days or more and still accruing:
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
$
|
60,890
|
|
|
$
|
41,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generally, loans are placed on non-accruing status when they
become 90 days or more delinquent, and remain on
non-accrual status until they are brought current, have six
months of performance under the loan terms, and factors
indicating reasonable doubt about the timely collection of
payments no longer exist. Therefore, loans may be current in
accordance with their loan terms, or may be less than
90 days delinquent and still be on a non-accruing status.
The following table details the delinquency status of
non-accruing loans at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days Past Due
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 to 29
|
|
|
30 to 89
|
|
|
90 or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
13,679
|
|
|
$
|
15,050
|
|
|
$
|
17,659
|
|
|
$
|
46,388
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
5,122
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
4,863
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
1,056
|
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
Insurance premium loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accruing loans
|
|
$
|
17,790
|
|
|
$
|
18,874
|
|
|
$
|
22,617
|
|
|
$
|
59,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in non-accrual loans was primarily attributable to
the following types being placed on non-accrual status during
the year ended December 31, 2010: $20.9 million of
commercial real estate loans, $3.9 million of multifamily
loans, $837,000 of commercial and industrial loans, $785,000 of
construction and
63
land loans, $401,000 of one- to four-family residential loans,
and $119,000 of home equity loans. These increases were
partially offset by the following payoffs during the year ended
December 31, 2010: $504,000 of a commercial real estate
loan, $557,000 of a multifamily loan, and $328,000 of three one-
to four-family residential loans. In addition, during the year
ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded an additional
$977,000 in charge-offs on existing non-accrual loans, recorded
paydowns of approximately $2.5 million, and returned two
loan relationships totaling $4.4 million back to accruing
status.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had $19.8 million of
accruing loans that were 30 to 89 days delinquent, as
compared to $28.3 million at December 31, 2009. The
following table sets forth the total amounts of delinquencies
for accruing loans that were 30 to 89 days past due by type
and by amount at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
8,970
|
|
|
$
|
11,573
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
4,716
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
6,194
|
|
|
|
7,086
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
1,555
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
Insurance premium loans
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
19,798
|
|
|
$
|
28,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accruing loans subject to restructuring agreements increased
to $20.0 million at December 31, 2010, from
$10.7 million at December 31, 2009. Loans subject to
restructuring agreements, and still accruing totaled
$11.2 million and $7.3 million at December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. During the year ended
December 31, 2010, the Company entered into ten troubled
debt restructuring agreements, of which $4.0 million and
$11.1 million were classified as accruing and non-accruing,
respectively, at December 31, 2010. At December 31,
2010, $23.5 million, or 75.4% of loans subject to
restructuring agreements were performing in accordance with
their restructured terms. All of the $11.2 million of
accruing troubled debt restructurings, and $12.3 million of
the $20.0 million of non-accruing troubled debt
restructurings, were performing in accordance with their
restructured terms. Generally, the types of concession that we
make to troubled borrowers include reduction in interest rates
and payment extensions. At December 31, 2010, 69% of TDRs
are commercial real estate loans, 13% are construction loans,
12% are multifamily loans, and 6% are one- to four-family
residential loans.
During 2010, the Company restructured one multifamily real
estate loan into two separate (A and B) notes. The A note
was underwritten in accordance with the Companys
underwriting standards, at a current market interest rate,
placed on non-accrual status, and included in the Companys
impaired loan balance at year-end. The remaining balance (the B
note) was fully charge-off during 2010. If the borrower
continues to perform under the restructured terms, the A note
could be returned to accrual status during 2011.
64
The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of the
troubled debt restructurings as of December 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Non-Accruing
|
|
|
Accruing
|
|
|
Non-Accruing
|
|
|
Accruing
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
13,138
|
|
|
$
|
7,879
|
|
|
$
|
3,960
|
|
|
$
|
5,499
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
4,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,726
|
|
|
|
1,751
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,978
|
|
|
$
|
11,198
|
|
|
$
|
10,717
|
|
|
$
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in non-accruing loans has been directly related to
the current economic downturn. As a result of decreasing real
estate values and sustained, high unemployment rates,
non-accrual loans have risen from December 31, 2009 to
December 31, 2010. These factors have contributed to the
increase in the Companys allowance for loan losses as
detailed below.
The allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans decreased
from 36.86% at December 31, 2009 to 35.83% at
December 31, 2010. This decrease was primarily attributable
to an increase in non-performing loans of $19.1 million,
from $41.8 million at December 31, 2009, to
$60.9 million at December 31, 2010, partially offset
by an increase of $6.4 million, or 41.6%, in the allowance
for loan losses over the same time period. As previously
discussed, the increase in non-accrual loans was primarily
attributable to increases in commercial real estate, and to a
lesser extent, multifamily loans during the same time period. At
December 31, 2010, 92.2% (balance of impaired loans) of the
appraisals utilized for our impairment analysis were completed
within the last 9 months, 3.0% (balance of impaired loans)
were completed with the last 18 months, with remaining 4.8%
(balance of impaired loans) being older than 18 months. All
appraisals older than 12 months were reviewed by management
and appropriate adjustments were made utilizing current market
indices. Generally loans are charged down to the appraised value
less costs to sell, which reduces the coverage ratio of the
allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans. Downward
adjustments to appraisal values, primarily to reflect
quick sale discounts, are generally recorded as
specific reserves within the allowance for loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses to loans
held-for-investment,
net, increased to 2.64% at December 31, 2010, from 2.11% at
December 31, 2009. This increase was attributable to an
increase of $6.4 million, or 41.6%, in the allowance for
loan losses from December 31, 2009, to December 31,
2010, partially offset by an increase in the loan portfolio over
the same time period. The increase in the Companys
allowance for loan losses during the year is primarily
attributable to specific reserves on impaired loans, and in
general loss factors related to increases in non-accrual loans,
fluctuations in loan delinquencies, and continued declines in
general economic conditions and real estate values.
Specific reserves on impaired loans increased $255,000, or
10.6%, from $2.4 million, for the year ended
December 31, 2009, to $2.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, the Company
had 44 loans classified as impaired and recorded a total of
$2.7 million of specific reserves on 13 of the 44 impaired
loans. At December 31, 2009, the Company had 30 loans
classified as impaired and recorded a total of $2.4 million
of specific reserves on 11 of the 30 impaired loans. The
increase in specific reserves recorded on impaired loans was
attributable to an increase in impaired loans coupled with
decreasing values of the underlying loan collateral.
65
The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for
loan losses, by loan type, for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
four Family
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Lines of
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Loan
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
and Land
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
3,456
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,636
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(1,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
5,176
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,778
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(1,348
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(686
|
)
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
8,403
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
15,414
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
5,238
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
5,403
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(1,122
|
)
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
10,084
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(987
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(2,132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
1,855
|
|
|
|
5,137
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
$
|
21,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company
recorded net charge-offs of $3.7 million, an increase of
$1.3 million, or 53.2%, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2009. The increase in net charge-offs was
primarily attributable to a $2.0 million increase in net
charge-offs related to multifamily real estate loans, partially
offset by a $361,000 decrease in net charge-offs related to
commercial real estate loans. As a result of higher net
charge-offs, an increase in non-accrual multifamily real estate
loans, coupled with the general decline in real estate values
and the current economic downturn, the Companys historical
and general loss factors have increased, thus increasing the
allowance for loan losses allocated to multifamily real estate
loans by $3.3 million, or 175.3%, from $1.9 million at
December 31, 2009, to $5.1 million at
December 31, 2010. In addition, the Company continued to
experience net charge-offs of commercial real estate loans,
charging off $987,000 during the year ended December 31,
2010, as compared to $1.3 million during the year ended
December 31, 2009. As a result of the net charge-offs
incurred, as well as increased levels of commercial real estate
loans on non-accrual status, coupled with the general decline in
real estate values and the current economic downturn, the
Companys historical and general loss factors have
increased, thus increasing the allowance for loan losses
allocated to commercial real estate loans by $4.3 million,
or 50.6%, from $8.4 million at December 31, 2009, to
$12.7 million at December 31, 2010. The allowance for
loan losses allocated to commercial and industrial loans and
construction and land loans decreased $1.2 million and
$554,000, respectively, from December 31, 2009, to
December 31, 2010. These decreases were primarily
attributable to a decrease in historical loss factors, coupled
with decreased levels of non-accrual loans, and loans that are
30 to 89 days past due. Particular to commercial and
industrial loans, the Company has experienced higher levels of
net charge-offs in 2008 as it entered this lending category.
Those charge-off levels decreased significantly as the
Companys experience in underwriting commercial and
industrial loans increased. The Company could experience an
increase in its allowance for loan losses in future periods if
charge-offs and non-performing loans continue to increase.
Management
of Market Risk
General. A majority of our assets and
liabilities are monetary in nature. Consequently, our most
significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. Our
assets, consisting primarily of mortgage-related assets and
loans, generally have longer maturities than our liabilities,
which consist primarily of deposits and wholesale funding. As a
result, a principal part of our business strategy involves
managing interest rate risk and limiting the exposure of our net
interest income to changes in market interest rates.
Accordingly, our board of directors has established a management
risk committee, comprised of our Treasurer, who chairs this
66
Committee, our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial
Officer, our Chief Lending Officer, and our Executive Vice
President of Operations. This committee is responsible for,
among other things, evaluating the interest rate risk inherent
in our assets and liabilities, for recommending to the risk
committee of our board of directors the level of risk that
is appropriate given our business strategy, operating
environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and
for managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved
by the board of directors.
We seek to manage our interest rate risk in order to minimize
the exposure of our earnings and capital to changes in interest
rates. As part of our ongoing asset-liability management, we
currently use the following strategies to manage our interest
rate risk:
|
|
|
|
|
originate commercial real estate loans and multifamily real
estate loans that generally have interest rates that reset every
five years;
|
|
|
|
invest in shorter maturity investment grade corporate securities
and mortgage-related securities; and
|
|
|
|
obtain general financing through lower cost deposits and
wholesale funding and repurchase agreements.
|
Net Portfolio Value Analysis. We compute the
net present value of our interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities (net portfolio value or
NPV) over a range of assumed market interest rates.
Our simulation model uses a discounted cash flow analysis to
measure the net portfolio value. We estimate the economic value
of these assets and liabilities under the assumption that
interest rates experience an instantaneous, parallel, and
sustained increase of 100, 200, 300, or 400 basis points,
or a decrease of 100 and 200 which is based on the current
interest rate environment. A basis point equals one-hundredth of
one percent, and 100 basis points equals one percent. An
increase in interest rates from 3% to 4% would mean, for
example, a 100 basis point increase in the Change in
Interest Rates column below.
Net Interest Income Analysis. We also analyze
our sensitivity to changes in interest rates through our net
interest income model. Net interest income is the difference
between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning
assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest we pay on
our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and
borrowings. We estimate what our net interest income would be
for a twelve-month period. We then calculate what the net
interest income would be for the same period under the
assumption that interest rates experience an instantaneous and
sustained increase of 100, 200, 300, or 400 basis points or
a decrease of 100 and 200 which is based on the current interest
rate environment.
The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2010, our
calculation of the estimated changes in our net portfolio value,
net present value ratio, and percent change in net interest
income that would result from the designated instantaneous and
sustained changes in interest rates. Computations of prospective
effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on
numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market
interest rates, loan prepayments and deposit decay, and should
not be relied on as indicative of actual results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Present
|
|
|
Present
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
NPV/Present
|
|
|
Net Interest
|
|
Interest Rates
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Income Percent
|
|
(Basis Points)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
NPV
|
|
|
NPV
|
|
|
Assets Ratio
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+400
|
|
|
$
|
2,043,868
|
|
|
$
|
1,712,552
|
|
|
$
|
331,316
|
|
|
$
|
(101,259
|
)
|
|
|
16.21
|
%
|
|
|
(17.06
|
)%
|
|
+300
|
|
|
|
2,088,974
|
|
|
|
1,739,123
|
|
|
|
349,851
|
|
|
|
(82,724
|
)
|
|
|
16.75
|
%
|
|
|
(12.67
|
)%
|
|
+200
|
|
|
|
2,143,522
|
|
|
|
1,766,592
|
|
|
|
376,930
|
|
|
|
(55,645
|
)
|
|
|
17.58
|
%
|
|
|
(7.83
|
)%
|
|
+100
|
|
|
|
2,199,053
|
|
|
|
1,795,001
|
|
|
|
404,052
|
|
|
|
(28,523
|
)
|
|
|
18.37
|
%
|
|
|
(3.27
|
)%
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,256,969
|
|
|
|
1,824,394
|
|
|
|
432,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
−100
|
|
|
|
2,302,356
|
|
|
|
1,853,958
|
|
|
|
448,398
|
|
|
|
15,823
|
|
|
|
19.48
|
%
|
|
|
0.72
|
%
|
|
−200
|
|
|
|
2,326,914
|
|
|
|
1,874,885
|
|
|
|
452,029
|
|
|
|
19,454
|
|
|
|
19.43
|
%
|
|
|
(3.38
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes an instantaneous and sustained uniform change in
interest rates at all maturities. |
|
(2) |
|
NPV includes non-interest earning assets and liabilities. |
67
The table above indicates that at December 31, 2010, in the
event of a 200 basis point decrease in interest rates, we
would experience a 4.50% increase in estimated net portfolio
value and a 3.38% decrease in net interest income. In the event
of a 400 basis point increase in interest rates, we would
experience a 23.41% decrease in net portfolio value and a 17.06%
decrease in net interest income. Our policies provide that, in
the event of a 400 basis point increase/decrease or less in
interest rates, our net present value ratio should decrease by
no more than 300 basis points and in the event of a
200 basis point increase/decrease, our projected net
interest income should decrease by no more than 20%.
Additionally, our policy states that our net portfolio value
should be at least 8.5% of total assets before and after such
shock at December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, we
were in compliance with all board approved policies with respect
to interest rate risk management.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodologies used in
determining interest rate risk through changes in net portfolio
value and net interest income. Our model requires us to make
certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in
which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market
interest rates. In this regard, the net portfolio value and net
interest income information presented assume that the
composition of our interest-sensitive assets and liabilities
existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the
period being measured and assume that a particular change in
interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve
regardless of the duration or repricing of specific assets and
liabilities. Accordingly, although interest rate risk
calculations provide an indication of our interest rate risk
exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are
not intended to and do not provide a precise forecast of the
effect of changes in market interest rates on our net interest
income and will differ from actual results.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to fund assets and meet obligations as
they come due. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit
inflows, loan repayments, borrowings through repurchase
agreements and advances from money center banks and the Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York, and repayments, maturities and sales
of securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of
loans and securities are reasonably predictable sources of
funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly
influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and
competition. Our board asset and liability management committee
is responsible for establishing and monitoring our liquidity
targets and strategies in order to ensure that sufficient
liquidity exists for meeting the borrowing needs and deposit
withdrawals of our customers as well as unanticipated
contingencies. We seek to maintain a ratio of liquid assets (not
subject to pledge) as a percentage of deposits and borrowings of
35% or greater. At December 31, 2010, this ratio was
67.86%. We believe that we had sufficient sources of liquidity
to satisfy our short- and long-term liquidity needs.
We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon
our assessment of:
|
|
|
|
|
expected loan demand;
|
|
|
|
expected deposit flows;
|
|
|
|
yields available on interest-earning deposits and
securities; and
|
|
|
|
the objectives of our asset/liability management program.
|
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents, and
unpledged mortgage-related securities issued or guaranteed by
the U.S. Government, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac, that we
can either borrow against or sell. We also have the ability to
surrender bank owned life insurance contracts. The surrender of
these contracts would subject the Company to income taxes and
penalties for increases in the cash surrender values over the
original premium payments.
68
The Company had the following primary sources of liquidity at
December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
43,852
|
|
Unpledged mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
442,407
|
|
(Issued or guaranteed by the
U.S. Government, Fannie Mae,
or Freddie Mac)
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, we had $29.5 million in
outstanding loan commitments. In addition, we had
$32.7 million in unused lines of credit to borrowers.
Certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31,
2010, totaled $474.0 million, or 34.5% of total deposits.
If these deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to
seek other sources of funds, including loan sales, other deposit
products, including replacement certificates of deposit,
securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase
agreements), and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York and other borrowing sources. Depending on market
conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such
deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the
certificates of deposit due on or before December 31, 2010.
We believe, based on past experience, that a significant portion
of such deposits will remain with us, and we have the ability to
attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates
offered.
The Company has a detailed contingency funding plan that is
reviewed and reported to the board risk committee on at least a
quarterly basis. This plan includes monitoring cash on a daily
basis to determine the liquidity needs of the Bank.
Additionally, management performs a stress test on the
Banks retail deposits and wholesale funding sources in
several scenarios on a quarterly basis. The stress scenarios
include deposit attrition of up to 50%, and selling our
securities
available-for-sale
portfolio at a discount of 20% to its current estimated fair
value. The Bank continues to maintain significant liquidity
under all stress scenarios.
Northfield Bank is subject to various regulatory capital
requirements, including a risk-based capital measure. The
risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of
capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by
assigning assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk
categories. At December 31, 2010, Northfield Bank exceeded
all regulatory capital requirements and is considered well
capitalized under regulatory guidelines. See
Supervision and Regulation Federal Banking
Regulation Capital Requirements and
Note 12 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual
Obligations
Commitments. As a financial services provider,
we routinely are a party to various financial instruments with
off-balance-sheet risks, such as commitments to extend credit,
and unused lines of credit. While these contractual obligations
represent our potential future cash requirements, a significant
portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being
drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit
policies and approval process applicable to loans we originate.
In addition, we routinely enter into commitments to sell
mortgage loans; such amounts are not significant to our
operations. For additional information, see Note 11 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary
course of our operations we enter into certain contractual
obligations. Such obligations include leases for premises and
equipment, agreements with respect to borrowed funds and deposit
liabilities, and agreements with respect to investments.
The following table summarizes our significant fixed and
determinable contractual obligations and other funding needs by
payment date at December 31, 2010. The payment amounts
represent those amounts due to
69
the recipient and do not include any unamortized premiums or
discounts or other similar carrying amount adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
One to Three
|
|
|
Three to Five
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
80,307
|
|
|
$
|
137,300
|
|
|
$
|
167,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,000
|
|
|
$
|
390,607
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
4,309
|
|
|
|
4,203
|
|
|
|
21,752
|
|
|
|
32,555
|
|
Capitalized leases
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
2,648
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
473,989
|
|
|
|
21,614
|
|
|
|
57,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
556,963
|
|
|
$
|
164,009
|
|
|
$
|
229,315
|
|
|
$
|
28,558
|
|
|
$
|
978,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit(2)
|
|
$
|
62,407
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
62,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes repurchase agreements, Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York advances, and accrued interest payable at December 31,
2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes unused lines of credit which are assumed to be funded
within the year. |
As of December 31, 2010, we serviced $52.1 million of
loans for Freddie Mac. These one- to four-family residential
mortgage real estate loans were underwritten to Freddie Mac
guidelines and to comply with applicable federal, state, and
local laws. At the time of the closing of these loans the
Company owned the loans and subsequently sold them to Freddie
Mac providing normal and customary representations and
warranties, including representations and warranties related to
compliance with Freddie Mac underwriting standards. At the time
of sale, the loans were free from encumbrances except for the
mortgages filed by the Company which, with other underwriting
documents, were subsequently assigned and delivered to Freddie
Mac. At December 31, 2010, substantially all of the loans
serviced for Freddie Mac were performing in accordance with
their contractual terms and management believes that it has no
material repurchase obligations associated with these loans.
Impact of
Recent Accounting Standards and Interpretations
ASC 810, Consolidation, replaces the quantitative-based
risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise,
if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which
enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable
interest entity that most significantly affect the entitys
economic performance and (i) the obligation to absorb
losses of the entity or (ii) the right to receive benefits
from the entity. The pronouncement was effective January 1,
2010, and did not have a significant effect on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, improves the
information a reporting entity provides in its financial
statements about a transfer of financial assets, including the
effect of a transfer on an entitys financial position,
financial performance and cash flows and the transferors
continuing involvement in the transferred assets. ASC 860
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity
and changes the guidance for evaluation for consolidation. This
pronouncement was effective January 1, 2010, and did not
have a significant effect on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
Accounting Standards Update
No. 2010-06
under ASC 820 requires new disclosures and clarifies
certain existing disclosure requirements about fair value
measurement. Specifically, the update requires an entity to
disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and
out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and
describe the reasons for such transfers. A reporting entity is
required to present separately information about purchases,
sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair
value measurements using Level 3 inputs. In addition, the
update clarifies the following requirements of the existing
disclosure: (i) for the purposes of reporting fair value
measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a
reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the
appropriate classes of assets; and (ii) a reporting entity
is required to include disclosures about the valuation
techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both
70
recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The
amendments were effective for interim and annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the
separate disclosures of purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim
periods within those fiscal years. We adopted these requirements
on January 1, 2010, and have provided the applicable
disclosures.
Accounting Standards Update
No. 2010-20
under ASC 310 requires new disclosures that provide
financial statement users with greater transparency about an
entitys allowance for credit losses and the credit quality
of its financing receivables. The update requires that an entity
provide disclosures on a disaggregated basis. This update
defines the two levels of disaggregation as portfolio segment
and class of financing receivable. A portfolio segment is
defined as the level at which an entity develops and documents a
systematic method for determining its allowance for credit
losses. Classes of financing receivables generally are a
disaggregation of a portfolio segment. This update also requires
an entity to disclose credit quality indicators, past due
information, and modifications of its financing receivables.
These disclosures, as of the end of a reporting period and about
activity that occurs during a reporting period, are effective
for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after
December 15, 2010. We adopted these requirements as of
December 31, 2010, and have provided the applicable
disclosures.
Accounting Standards Update
No. 2010-28
under ASC 350 details when to perform Step 2 of the
goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or
negative carrying amounts. Under Topic 350 on goodwill and other
intangible assets, testing for goodwill impairment is a two-step
test. When a goodwill impairment test is performed (either on an
annual or interim basis), an entity must assess whether the
carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value (Step
1). If it does, an entity must perform an additional test to
determine whether goodwill has been impaired and to calculate
the amount of that impairment (Step 2). The amendments in this
update modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for
reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For
those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2
of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not
that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is
more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an
entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative
factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The amendments
in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those years, beginning after December 15,
2010, and did not have a significant effect on the
Companys consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
Accounting Standards Update
No. 2011-01
temporarily delays the effective date of the disclosures about
troubled debt restructurings in Update
2010-20 for
public entities. The delay is intended to allow the FASB time to
complete its deliberations on what constitutes a troubled debt
restructuring. The effective date of the new disclosures about
troubled debt restructurings for public entities and the
guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt
restructuring will then be coordinated. Currently, that guidance
is anticipated to be effective for interim and annual periods
ending after June 15, 2011.
Impact of
Inflation and Changing Prices
Our consolidated financial statements and related notes have
been prepared in accordance with GAAP. GAAP generally requires
the measurement of financial position and operating results in
terms of historical dollars without consideration for changes in
the relative purchasing power of money over time due to
inflation. The effect of inflation is reflected in the increased
cost of our operations. Unlike industrial companies, our assets
and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature. As a result,
changes in market interest rates have a greater effect on our
performance than inflation.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
For information regarding market risk see
Item 7-
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Conditions and Results of Operations Management of
Market Risk.
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
71
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc, and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2010. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of evaluating
other-than-temporary
impairments of debt securities due to the adoption of new
accounting requirements issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board, as of April 1, 2009.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 15, 2011
expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Short Hills, New Jersey
March 15, 2011
72
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries:
We have audited Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In
addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and our
report dated March 15, 2011 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Short Hills, New Jersey
March 15, 2011
73
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS:
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
9,862
|
|
|
|
10,183
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
33,990
|
|
|
|
32,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
43,852
|
|
|
|
42,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
4,095
|
|
|
|
3,403
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale,
at estimated fair value (encumbered $275,694 in 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and $219,446 in 2009)
|
|
|
1,244,313
|
|
|
|
1,131,803
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity,
at amortized cost (estimated fair value of $5,273 and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$6,930 in 2010 and 2009, respectively) (encumbered $0 in 2010
and 2009)
|
|
|
5,060
|
|
|
|
6,740
|
|
Loans
held-for-sale
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
held-for-investment,
net
|
|
|
827,591
|
|
|
|
729,269
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(21,819
|
)
|
|
|
(15,414
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
held-for-investment
|
|
|
805,772
|
|
|
|
713,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
7,873
|
|
|
|
8,054
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
74,805
|
|
|
|
43,751
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost
|
|
|
9,784
|
|
|
|
6,421
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
16,057
|
|
|
|
12,676
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
16,159
|
|
|
|
16,159
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
18,056
|
|
|
|
14,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,247,167
|
|
|
|
2,002,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
1,372,842
|
|
|
|
1,316,885
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
243,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
148,237
|
|
|
|
79,424
|
|
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
85,678
|
|
|
|
13,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,850,450
|
|
|
|
1,610,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 90,000,000 shares
authorized, 45,632,611 and 45,628,211 shares issued at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, 43,316,021 and
43,912,148 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
205,863
|
|
|
|
202,479
|
|
Unallocated common stock held by employee stock ownership plan
|
|
|
(15,188
|
)
|
|
|
(15,807
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
222,655
|
|
|
|
212,196
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
10,910
|
|
|
|
12,145
|
|
Treasury stock at cost; 2,316,590 and 1,716,063 shares at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively
|
|
|
(27,979
|
)
|
|
|
(19,929
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
396,717
|
|
|
|
391,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,247,167
|
|
|
|
2,002,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
74
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
46,681
|
|
|
|
38,889
|
|
|
|
31,617
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
33,306
|
|
|
|
42,256
|
|
|
|
38,072
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
6,011
|
|
|
|
3,223
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York dividends
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
Deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
3,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
86,495
|
|
|
|
85,568
|
|
|
|
75,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
13,573
|
|
|
|
18,214
|
|
|
|
18,522
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
10,833
|
|
|
|
10,763
|
|
|
|
9,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
24,406
|
|
|
|
28,977
|
|
|
|
28,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
62,089
|
|
|
|
56,591
|
|
|
|
46,793
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
10,084
|
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
52,005
|
|
|
|
47,553
|
|
|
|
41,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees and service charges for customer services
|
|
|
2,582
|
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
|
|
3,133
|
|
Income on bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
4,235
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities transactions, net
|
|
|
1,853
|
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
(1,318
|
)
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment losses on securities
|
|
|
(962
|
)
|
|
|
(1,365
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Portion recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes)
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses on securities recognized in earnings
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
|
6,842
|
|
|
|
5,393
|
|
|
|
6,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits
|
|
|
19,056
|
|
|
|
16,896
|
|
|
|
11,723
|
|
Director compensation
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
5,149
|
|
|
|
4,602
|
|
|
|
3,864
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
2,521
|
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
|
|
3,021
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
3,613
|
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
FDIC insurance
|
|
|
1,805
|
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,954
|
|
|
|
3,418
|
|
|
|
2,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
|
|
38,684
|
|
|
|
34,254
|
|
|
|
24,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
20,163
|
|
|
|
18,692
|
|
|
|
23,012
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
6,370
|
|
|
|
6,618
|
|
|
|
7,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
13,793
|
|
|
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
41,387,106
|
|
|
|
42,405,774
|
|
|
|
43,133,856
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
41,669,006
|
|
|
|
42,532,568
|
|
|
|
43,133,856
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
75
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Held by the
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
Paid-ln
|
|
|
Employee Stock
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Income (loss),
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Ownership Plan
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except share data)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
44,803,061
|
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
|
199,395
|
|
|
|
(16,977
|
)
|
|
|
187,992
|
|
|
|
(3,518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains on securities arising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the year (net of tax of $2,434)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,479
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in net income (net of tax of $6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Post retirement benefits adjustment (net of tax $28)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared ($0.04 per common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
44,803,061
|
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
|
199,453
|
|
|
|
(16,391
|
)
|
|
|
203,085
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,074
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains on securities arising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the year (net of tax of $8,438)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,075
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in net income (net of tax of $35)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
Post retirement benefits adjustment (net of tax $26)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in net income (net of tax of $70)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,942
|
|
Cash dividends declared ($0.16 per common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,963
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,963
|
)
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
825,150
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Treasury stock (average cost of $11.61 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,929
|
)
|
|
|
(19,929
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
45,628,211
|
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
|
|
202,479
|
|
|
|
(15,807
|
)
|
|
|
212,196
|
|
|
|
12,145
|
|
|
|
(19,929
|
)
|
|
|
391,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,793
|
|
Net unrealized holding losses on securities arising during the
year (net of tax of $577)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(682
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(682
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income
(net of tax of $585)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(670
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(670
|
)
|
Post retirement benefits adjustment (net of tax $11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI impairment included in net
income (net of tax of $72)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,020
|
|
Additional tax benefit on equity awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
Cash dividends declared ($0.19 per common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,308
|
)
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock (average cost of $13.37 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,213
|
)
|
|
|
(8,213
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
45,632,611
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
205,863
|
|
|
|
(15,188
|
)
|
|
|
222,655
|
|
|
|
10,910
|
|
|
|
(27,979
|
)
|
|
|
396,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
76
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
13,793
|
|
|
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
10,084
|
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
1,679
|
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
Amortization (accretion) of premium and discounts on securities,
and deferred loan fees and costs
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
(1,486
|
)
|
|
|
(1,098
|
)
|
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Income on bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
(2,273
|
)
|
|
|
(1,750
|
)
|
|
|
(4,235
|
)
|
Net gain on sale of loans
held-for-sale
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of loans
held-for-sale
|
|
|
5,713
|
|
|
|
7,509
|
|
|
|
4,092
|
|
Origination of loans
held-for-sale
|
|
|
(6,849
|
)
|
|
|
(7,371
|
)
|
|
|
(3,793
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on securities transactions, net
|
|
|
(1,853
|
)
|
|
|
(891
|
)
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
Net impairment losses on securities recognized in earnings
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net purchases of trading securities
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(313
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
(2,719
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
(5,283
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) prepaid FDIC assessment
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
|
|
(5,736
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released and stock
compensation expense
|
|
|
3,819
|
|
|
|
3,618
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(2,905
|
)
|
|
|
(4,938
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
(6,253
|
)
|
Amortization of core deposit intangible
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
25,575
|
|
|
|
15,164
|
|
|
|
5,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in loans receivable
|
|
|
(103,037
|
)
|
|
|
(108,385
|
)
|
|
|
(163,643
|
)
|
Purchases of loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(Purchases) redemptions of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
stock, net
|
|
|
(3,363
|
)
|
|
|
2,989
|
|
|
|
(2,708
|
)
|
Purchases of securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
(845,781
|
)
|
|
|
(655,765
|
)
|
|
|
(421,696
|
)
|
Principal payments and maturities on securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
581,525
|
|
|
|
500,518
|
|
|
|
270,091
|
|
Principal payments and maturities on securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
5,214
|
|
Proceeds from sale of securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
221,187
|
|
|
|
3,293
|
|
|
|
3,350
|
|
Proceeds from sale of securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of certificates of deposit in other financial
institutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(118,653
|
)
|
Proceeds from maturities of certificates of deposit in other
financial institutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,716
|
|
|
|
89,500
|
|
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
(28,781
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from bank owned life insurance contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,794
|
|
Purchases and improvements of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(5,369
|
)
|
|
|
(5,456
|
)
|
|
|
(2,662
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(180,820
|
)
|
|
|
(236,576
|
)
|
|
|
(337,413
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits
|
|
|
55,957
|
|
|
|
292,446
|
|
|
|
147,214
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(3,308
|
)
|
|
|
(2,963
|
)
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(8,213
|
)
|
|
|
(19,929
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Additional tax benefit on equity awards
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes
and insurance
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(3,066
|
)
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
Repayments under capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
Proceeds from securities sold under agreements to repurchase and
other borrowings
|
|
|
378,501
|
|
|
|
138,600
|
|
|
|
410,800
|
|
Repayments related to securities sold under agreements to
repurchase and other borrowings
|
|
|
(266,501
|
)
|
|
|
(191,100
|
)
|
|
|
(203,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
156,553
|
|
|
|
213,828
|
|
|
|
357,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
(7,584
|
)
|
|
|
25,040
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
42,544
|
|
|
|
50,128
|
|
|
|
25,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
43,852
|
|
|
|
42,544
|
|
|
|
50,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
24,463
|
|
|
|
29,334
|
|
|
|
27,322
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
9,776
|
|
|
|
10,351
|
|
|
|
11,316
|
|
Non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged-off, net
|
|
|
3,679
|
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
Other real estate owned charged-off
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan to finance sale of other real estate owned
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to broker for purchases of securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
70,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
77
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008
|
|
(1)
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
The following significant accounting and reporting policies of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, the
Company), conform to U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, or (GAAP), and are used in
preparing and presenting these consolidated financial statements.
|
|
(a)
|
Basis
of Presentation
|
The consolidated financial statements are comprised of the
accounts of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned
subsidiaries, Northfield Investment, Inc. and Northfield Bank
(the Bank) and the Banks wholly-owned
significant subsidiaries, NSB Services Corp. and NSB Realty
Trust. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
In 1995, the Bank completed a Plan of Mutual Holding Company
Reorganization, utilizing a single-tier mutual holding company
structure. In a series of steps, the Bank formed a New
York-chartered mutual holding company (NSB Holding Corp.) which
owned 100% of the common stock of the Bank. In 2002, NSB Holding
Corp. formed Northfield Holdings Corp., a New York-chartered
stock corporation, and contributed 100% of the common stock of
the Bank into Northfield Holdings Corp. which owned 100% of the
common stock of Northfield Holdings Corp. In 2006, Northfield
Holdings Corp.s name was changed to Northfield Bancorp,
Inc. and Northfield Savings Banks name was changed to
Northfield Bank. In 2007, NSB Holdings Corp.s name was
changed to Northfield Bancorp, MHC.
As part of the stock issuance plan announced in April 2007,
Northfield Bank converted to a federally-charted savings bank
from a New York-chartered savings bank effective
November 6, 2007. On November 7, 2007, the Company
completed its initial public stock offering. The Company sold
19,265,316 shares, or 43.0% of its outstanding common
stock, to subscribers in the offering, including
1,756,279 shares purchased by the Northfield Bank Employee
Stock Ownership Plan. Northfield Bancorp, MHC, the
Companys federally chartered mutual holding company parent
originally held 24,641,684 shares, or 55.0% of the
Companys outstanding common stock. Additionally, the
Company contributed $3.0 million in cash, and issued
896,061 shares of common stock, or 2.0% of the
Companys outstanding common stock to the Northfield Bank
Charitable Foundation. The Northfield Bank Charitable Foundation
purchased the common stock at par value.
Northfield Banks primary federal regulator is the Office
of Thrift Supervision (the OTS) and was the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) prior to
our November 2007 conversion. Simultaneously with Northfield
Banks conversion, Northfield Bancorp, MHC, and Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. converted to federal-chartered holding companies
from New York-chartered holding companies.
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Reform Act.
The Reform Act, among other things, effectively merges the OTS
into the OCC, with the OCC assuming all functions and authority
from the OTS relating to federally chartered savings banks, and
the FRB assuming all functions and authority from the OTS
relating to savings and loan holding companies. Pursuant to the
Reform Act, the OTS will be merged into the OCC as early as July
2011 at which time Northfield Bank will be regulated by the OCC
and the Company will be regulated by the FRB.
The Boards of Directors of Northfield Bancorp, MHC, and the
Company adopted a Plan of Conversion and Reorganization on
June 4, 2010. On September 30, 2010, Northfield
Bancorp, Inc., a federal corporation and the stock holding
company for Northfield Bank, announced due to the current market
conditions that Northfield Bancorp, Inc., the recently formed
Delaware corporation and proposed new holding company for
Northfield Bank, had postponed its stock offering in connection
with the second-step conversion of Northfield Bancorp, MHC.
78
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management
is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the
balance sheets and revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results may differ significantly from those
estimates and assumptions. A material estimate that is
particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term
is the allowance for loan losses. In connection with the
determination of this allowance, management generally obtains
independent appraisals for significant properties. Judgments
related to goodwill, securities valuation and impairment, and
deferred income taxes, involve a higher degree of complexity and
subjectivity and require estimates and assumptions about highly
uncertain matters. Actual results may differ from the estimates
and assumptions.
Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to
the current year presentation.
The Company, through its principal subsidiary, the Bank,
provides a full range of banking services primarily to
individuals and corporate customers in Richmond and Kings
Counties in New York, and Union and Middlesex Counties in New
Jersey. The Company also finances insurance premiums for
commercial customers throughout the continental United States.
The Company is subject to competition from other financial
institutions and to the regulations of certain federal and state
agencies, and undergoes periodic examinations by those
regulatory authorities.
Cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, due from banks,
federal funds sold, and interest-bearing deposits in other
financial institutions with an original term of three months or
less.
Securities are classified at the time of purchase, based on
managements intention, as securities held-to-maturity,
securities
available-for-sale,
or trading account securities. Securities
held-to-maturity
are those that management has the positive intent and ability to
hold until maturity. Securities
held-to-maturity
are carried at amortized cost, adjusted for amortization of
premiums and accretion of discounts using the level-yield method
over the contractual term of the securities, adjusted for actual
prepayments. Trading securities are securities that are bought
and may be held for the purpose of selling them in the near
term. Trading securities are reported at estimated fair value,
with unrealized holding gains and losses reported as a component
of gain (loss) on securities transactions, net in non-interest
income. Securities
available-for-sale
represents all securities not classified as either
held-to-maturity
or trading. Securities
available-for-sale
are carried at estimated fair value with unrealized holding
gains and losses (net of related tax effects) on such securities
excluded from earnings, but included as a separate component of
stockholders equity, titled Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss). The cost of securities sold
is determined using the specific-identification method. Security
transactions are recorded on a trade-date basis.
Our evaluation of
other-than-temporary
impairment considers the duration and severity of the
impairment, our intent and ability to hold the securities, and
our assessments of the reason for the decline in value and the
likelihood of a near-term recovery. If a determination is made
that a debt security is
other-than-temporarily
impaired, the Company will estimate the amount of the unrealized
loss that is attributable to credit and all other non-credit
related factors. The credit related component will be recognized
as an
other-than-temporary
impairment charge in non-interest income. The non-credit related
component will be recorded as an adjustment to accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. The estimated fair
value of debt securities, including mortgage-backed securities
and corporate debt obligations is furnished by an independent
third party pricing service. The third party pricing service
primarily utilizes pricing models and methodologies that
incorporate observable market inputs, including among other
things, benchmark yields, reported trades, and
79
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
projected prepayment and default rates. Management reviews the
data and assumptions used in pricing the securities by its third
party provider for reasonableness.
Net loans
held-for-investment
are stated at unpaid principal balance, adjusted by unamortized
premiums and unearned discounts, deferred origination fees and
certain direct origination costs, and the allowance for loan
losses. Interest income on loans is accrued and credited to
income as earned. Net loan origination fees/costs are deferred
and accreted/amortized to interest income over the loans
contractual life using the level-yield method, adjusted for
actual prepayments. Loans
held-for-sale
are designated at time of origination and generally consist of
residential loans and are recorded at the lower of cost or
estimated fair value in the aggregate. Gains are recognized on a
settlement-date basis and are determined by the difference
between the net sales proceeds and the carrying value of the
loans, including any net deferred fees or costs.
The Company defines an impaired loan as a loan for which it is
probable, based on current information, that the Company will
not collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual
terms of the loan agreement. The Company has defined the
population of impaired loans to be all non-accrual loans with an
outstanding balance of $500,000 or greater. Impaired loans are
individually assessed to determine that the loans carrying
value is not in excess of the expected future cash flows,
discounted at the loans original effective interest rate, or the
underlying collateral (less estimated costs to sell) if the loan
is collateral dependent. Impairments are recognized through a
charge to the provision for loan losses for the amount that the
loans carrying value exceeds the discounted cash flow
analysis or estimated fair value of collateral (less estimated
costs to sell) if the loan is collateral dependent. Homogeneous
loans with balances less than $500,000 are collectively
evaluated for impairment.
The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for
loan losses charged against income and is decreased by
charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loan losses are charged-off in
the period the loans, or portion thereof, are deemed
uncollectible. Generally, the Company will record a loan
charge-off (including a partial charge-off) to reduce a loan to
the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, less cost
to sell, if it is determined that it is probable that recovery
will come primarily from the sale of such collateral. The
provision for loan losses is based on managements
evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance which considers,
among other things, impaired loans, past loan loss experience,
known and inherent risks in the portfolio, existing adverse
situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay,
and estimated value of any underlying collateral securing loans.
Additionally, management evaluates changes, if any, in
underwriting standards, collection, charge-off and recovery
practices, the nature or volume of the portfolio, lending staff,
concentration of loans, as well as current economic conditions,
and other relevant factors. Management believes the allowance
for loan losses is adequate to provide for probable and
reasonably estimable losses at the date of the consolidated
balance sheets. The Company also maintains an allowance for
estimated losses on off-balance sheet credit risks related to
loan commitments and standby letters of credit. Management
utilizes a methodology similar to its allowance for loan loss
adequacy methodology to estimate losses on these commitments.
The allowance for estimated credit losses on off-balance sheet
commitments is included in other liabilities and any changes to
the allowance are recorded as a component of other non-interest
expense.
While management uses available information to recognize
probable and reasonably estimable losses on loans, future
additions may be necessary based on changes in conditions,
including changes in economic conditions, particularly in
Richmond and Kings Counties in New York, and Union and Middlesex
Counties in New Jersey. Accordingly, as with most financial
institutions in the market area, the ultimate collectibility of
a substantial portion of the Companys loan portfolio is
susceptible to changes in conditions in the Companys
marketplace. In addition, future changes in laws and regulations
could make it more difficult for the Company to collect all
contractual amounts due on its loans and mortgage-backed
securities.
80
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of
their examination process, periodically review the
Companys allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may
require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance
based on their judgments about information available to them at
the time of their examination.
Troubled debt restructured loans are those loans whose terms
have been modified because of deterioration in the financial
condition of the borrower. Modifications could include extension
of the terms of the loan, reduced interest rates, and
forgiveness of accrued interest
and/or
principal. Once an obligation has been restructured because of
such credit problems, it continues to be considered restructured
until paid in full or, if the obligation yields a market rate (a
rate equal to or greater than the rate the Company was willing
to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with
comparable risk), until the year subsequent to the year in which
the restructuring takes place, provided the borrower has
performed under the modified terms for a six-month period. The
Company records an impairment charge equal to the difference
between the present value of estimated future cash flows under
the restructured terms discounted at the original loans
effective interest rate, or the underlying collateral value less
costs to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent. Changes in
present values attributable to the passage of time are recorded
as a component of the provision for loan losses.
A loan is considered past due when it is not paid in accordance
with its contractual terms. The accrual of income on loans,
including impaired loans, and other loans in the process of
foreclosure, is generally discontinued when a loan becomes
90 days or more delinquent, or when certain factors
indicate that the ultimate collection of principal and interest
is in doubt. Loans on which the accrual of income has been
discontinued are designated as non-accrual loans. All previously
accrued interest is reversed against interest income, and income
is recognized subsequently only in the period that cash is
received, provided no principal payments are due and the
remaining principal balance outstanding is deemed collectible. A
non-accrual loan is not returned to accrual status until both
principal and interest payments are brought current and factors
indicating doubtful collection no longer exist, including
performance by the borrower under the loan terms for a six-month
period.
|
|
(f)
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank Stock
|
The Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
(the FHLB), is required to hold shares of capital
stock in the FHLB as a condition to both becoming a member and
engaging in certain transactions with the FHLB. The minimum
investment requirement is determined by a membership
investment component and an activity-based
investment component. The membership investment component is the
greater of 0.20% of the Banks mortgage-related assets, as
defined by the FHLB, or $1,000. The activity-based investment
component is equal to 4.5% of the Banks outstanding
advances with the FHLB. The activity-based investment component
also considers other transactions, including assets originated
for or sold to the FHLB, and delivery commitments issued by the
FHLB. The Company currently does not enter into these other
types of transactions with the FHLB.
On a quarterly basis, we perform our
other-than-temporary
impairment analysis of FHLB stock, we evaluate, among other
things, (i) its earnings performance, including the
significance of any decline in net assets of the FHLB as
compared to the regulatory capital amount of the FHLB,
(ii) the commitment by the FHLB to continue dividend
payments, and (iii) the liquidity position of the FHLB. We
do not consider our investment in FHLB stock to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired at December 31, 2010.
|
|
(g)
|
Premises
and Equipment, Net
|
Premises and equipment, including leasehold improvements, are
carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment,
including capital leases, are computed on a straight-line basis
over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The
estimated useful lives of significant classes of assets are
generally as follows: buildings forty years;
furniture and
81
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
equipment five to seven years; and purchased
computer software three years. Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the shorter of the term of the
related lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.
Major improvements are capitalized, while repairs and
maintenance costs are charged to operations as incurred. Upon
retirement or sale, any gain or loss is credited or charged to
operations.
|
|
(h)
|
Bank
Owned Life Insurance
|
The Company has purchased bank owned life insurance contracts to
help fund its obligations for certain employee benefit costs.
The Companys investment in such insurance contracts has
been reported in the consolidated balance sheets at their cash
surrender values. Changes in cash surrender values and death
benefit proceeds received in excess of the related cash
surrender values are recorded as non-interest income.
Goodwill is presumed to have an indefinite useful life and is
not amortized, but rather is tested, at least annually, for
impairment at the reporting unit level. For purposes of the
Companys goodwill impairment testing, management has
identified a single reporting unit. The Company uses the quoted
market price of its common stock on the impairment testing date
as the basis for estimating the fair value of the Companys
reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds
its carrying amount, further evaluation is not necessary.
However, if the fair value of the reporting unit is less than
its carrying amount, further evaluation is required to compare
the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill to
its carrying amount to determine if a write-down of goodwill is
required. As of December 31, 2010, the carrying value of
goodwill totaled $16.2 million. The Company performed its
annual goodwill impairment test, as of December 31, 2010,
and determined the fair value of the Companys one
reporting unit to be in excess of its carrying value.
Accordingly, as of the annual impairment test date, there was no
indication of goodwill impairment. The Company will test
goodwill for impairment between annual test dates if an event
occurs or circumstances change that would indicate the fair
value of the reporting unit is below its carrying amount. No
events have occurred and no circumstances have changed since the
annual impairment test date that would indicate the fair value
of the reporting unit is below its carrying amount.
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the estimated future tax consequences attributable to temporary
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted
tax rates expected to apply in the year in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. When
applicable, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation
allowance for any portions determined not likely to be realized.
The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in
tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date.
The Company accounts for income taxes as required by the income
taxes topic of the FASB Accounting Standards. The topic
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an enterprises financial statements and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also
provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and
transition.
|
|
(k)
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
|
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
the asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be
held and used is
82
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to
future undiscounted (and without interest) net cash flows
expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are
considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is
measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the
assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be
disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or
fair value less costs to sell.
|
|
(l)
|
Securities
Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other
Borrowings
|
The Company enters into sales of securities under agreements to
repurchase (Repurchase Agreements) and collateral pledge
agreements (Pledge Agreements) with selected dealers and banks.
Such agreements are accounted for as secured financing
transactions since the Company maintains effective control over
the transferred or pledged securities and the transfer meets the
other accounting and recognition criteria as required by the
transfer and servicing topic of the FASB Accounting Standards.
Obligations under these agreements are reflected as a liability
in the consolidated balance sheets. Securities underlying the
agreements are maintained at selected dealers and banks as
collateral for each transaction executed and may be sold or
pledged by the counterparty. Collateral underlying Repurchase
Agreements which permit the counterparty to sell or pledge the
underlying collateral is disclosed on the consolidated balance
sheets as encumbered. The Company retains the right
under all Repurchase Agreements and Pledge Agreements to
substitute acceptable collateral throughout the terms of the
agreement.
Comprehensive income includes net income and the change in
unrealized holding gains and losses on securities
available-for-sale,
change in actuarial gains and losses on other post retirement
benefits, and change in service cost on other postretirement
benefits, net of taxes. Comprehensive income is presented in the
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity.
The Company sponsors a defined postretirement benefit plan that
provides for medical and life insurance coverage to a limited
number of retirees, as well as life insurance to all qualifying
employees of the Company. The estimated cost of postretirement
benefits earned is accrued during an individuals estimated
service period to the Company. The Company recognizes in its
balance sheet the over-funded or under-funded status of a
defined benefit postretirement plan measured as the difference
between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation
at the end of our calendar year. The actuarial gains and losses
and the prior service costs and credits that arise during the
period are recognized as a component of other comprehensive
income, net of tax.
Funds borrowed by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) from
the Company to purchase the Companys common stock are
being repaid from the Banks contributions over a period of
up to 30 years. The Companys common stock not yet
allocated to participants is recorded as a reduction of
stockholders equity at cost. The Company records
compensation expense related to the ESOP at an amount equal to
the shares committed to be released by the ESOP multiplied by
the average fair value of our common stock during the reporting
period.
The Company recognizes the grant-date fair value of stock based
awards issued to employees as compensation cost in the
consolidated statements of income. The fair value of common
stock awards is based on the closing price of our common stock
as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market on the grant date. The
expense related to stock options is based on the estimated fair
value of the options at the date of the grant using the
Black-Scholes pricing model. The awards are fixed in nature and
compensation cost related to stock based awards is recognized on
a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods.
83
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Bank has a 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees.
Contributions to the plan are expensed as incurred.
As a community-focused financial institution, substantially all
of the Companys operations involve the delivery of loan
and deposit products to customers. Management makes operating
decisions and assesses performance based on an ongoing review of
these community banking operations, which constitute the
Companys only operating segment for financial reporting
purposes.
|
|
(p)
|
Net
Income per Common Share
|
Net income per common share-basic is computed for the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, by dividing the
net income available to common stockholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding, excluding
unallocated ESOP shares and unearned common stock award shares.
The weighted average common shares outstanding includes the
average number of shares of common stock outstanding, including
shares held by Northfield Bancorp, MHC and allocated or
committed to be released ESOP shares.
Net income per common share-diluted is computed using the same
method as basic earnings per share, but reflects the potential
dilution that could occur if stock options and unvested shares
of restricted stock were exercised and converted into common
stock. These potentially dilutive shares are included in the
weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period
using the treasury stock method. When applying the treasury
stock method, we add: (1) the assumed proceeds from option
exercises; (2) the tax benefit, if any, that would have
been credited to additional paid-in capital assuming exercise of
non-qualified stock options and vesting of shares of restricted
stock; and (3) the average unamortized compensation costs
related to unvested shares of restricted stock and stock
options. We then divide this sum by our average stock price for
the period to calculate assumed shares repurchased. The excess
of the number of shares issuable over the number of shares
assumed to be repurchased is added to basic weighted average
common shares to calculate diluted earnings per share. At
December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, there were 281,900,
126,794, and 0 dilutive shares outstanding, respectively.
|
|
(q)
|
Other
Real Estate Owned
|
Assets acquired through loan foreclosure, or
deed-in-lieu
of, are held for sale and are initially recorded at estimated
fair value less estimated selling costs when acquired, thus
establishing a new cost basis. Costs after acquisition are
generally expensed. If the estimated fair value of the asset
declines, a write-down is recorded through other non-interest
expense.
84
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(2)
|
Securities
Available-for-Sale
|
The following is a comparative summary of mortgage-backed
securities and other securities available-for- sale at December
31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government sponsored enterprises (GSE)
|
|
$
|
342,316
|
|
|
|
13,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355,795
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
27,801
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
27,878
|
|
Real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
622,582
|
|
|
|
3,020
|
|
|
|
3,525
|
|
|
|
622,077
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
65,766
|
|
|
|
3,674
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
69,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058,465
|
|
|
|
20,987
|
|
|
|
4,313
|
|
|
|
1,075,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments mutual funds
|
|
|
12,437
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
12,353
|
|
GSE bonds
|
|
|
34,988
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,033
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
119,765
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
121,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,190
|
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
169,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
1,225,655
|
|
|
|
23,209
|
|
|
|
4,551
|
|
|
|
1,244,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
404,128
|
|
|
|
13,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418,060
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
65,363
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
62,466
|
|
REMICs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
344,150
|
|
|
|
5,368
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
349,088
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
111,756
|
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
114,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
925,397
|
|
|
|
22,726
|
|
|
|
4,315
|
|
|
|
943,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments mutual funds
|
|
|
21,820
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,872
|
|
GSE bonds
|
|
|
28,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
28,983
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
134,595
|
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
137,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,409
|
|
|
|
2,647
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
187,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
1,110,806
|
|
|
|
25,373
|
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
|
|
1,131,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following is a summary of the expected maturity distribution
of debt securities
available-for-sale
other than mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2010
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
cost
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
64,393
|
|
|
|
65,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
90,360
|
|
|
|
91,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
154,753
|
|
|
|
156,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturities on mortgage-backed securities will differ
from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to
call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.
Certain securities
available-for-sale
are pledged to secure borrowings under Pledge Agreements and
Repurchase Agreements and for other purposes required by law. At
December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009, securities
available-for-sale
with a carrying value of $5,725,000 and $6,537,000,
respectively, were pledged to secure deposits. See note 7
for further discussion regarding securities pledged for
borrowings.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company had gross
proceeds of $221,187,000 on sales of securities
available-for-sale
with gross realized gains and gross realized losses of
approximately $1,260,000 and $4,000, respectively. For the year
ended December 31, 2009, the Company had gross proceeds of
$3,293,000 on sales of securities
available-for-sale
with gross realized gains and gross realized losses of
approximately $89,000 and $0, respectively. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, the Company had gross proceeds of
$3,350,000 on sales of securities
available-for-sale
with gross realized gains and gross realized losses of
approximately $15,000 and $0, respectively. The Company
routinely sells securities when market pricing presents, in
managements assessment, an economic benefit that outweighs
holding such security, and when smaller balance securities
become cost prohibitive to carry.
The Company recognized
other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $962,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2010, related to one private label
mortgage-backed security. The Company recognized the credit
component of $154,000 in earnings and the non-credit component
of $808,000 as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of tax. The Company recognized
other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $1.4 million during the year ended
December 31, 2009 related to one private label
mortgage-backed security. The company recognized the credit
component of $176,000 in earnings and the non-credit component
of $1.2 million as a part of accumulated other
comprehensive income, net of tax. The Company did not record
other-than-temporary
impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2008.
The following is a rollforward of 2010, 2009, and 2008 activity
related to the credit component of
other-than-temporary
impairment recognized on debt securities in pre-tax earnings,
for which a portion of
other-than-temporary
impairment was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to the credit component on debt securities in which
other- than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative pre-tax credit losses, end of year
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities, equity
securities, agency bonds, and corporate bonds
available-for-sale,
and the estimated fair value of the related securities,
aggregated by security category
86
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
and length of time that individual securities have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2010
and 2009, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
10,126
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
10,126
|
|
REMICs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
3,525
|
|
|
|
344,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,525
|
|
|
|
344,971
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
13,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
13,880
|
|
Equity Investments mutual funds
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
4,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
4,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,763
|
|
|
|
363,735
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
11,364
|
|
|
|
4,551
|
|
|
|
375,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
3,695
|
|
|
|
27,832
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
29,294
|
|
REMICs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
116,478
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
16,507
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
132,985
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
6,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
6,970
|
|
GSE bonds
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4,019
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
16,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
16,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
680
|
|
|
|
144,946
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
44,339
|
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
|
|
189,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the above
available-for-sale
security amounts at December 31, 2010, were two
pass-through non-GSE mortgage-backed securities in a continuous
unrealized loss position of greater than twelve months, that
were rated less than AAA at December 31, 2010. Of these two
securities, one had an estimated fair value of $4.4 million
(amortized cost of $4.4 million), was rated CC, and was
supported by collateral entirely originated in 2006. The second
security had an estimated fair value of $5.7 million
(amortized cost of $6.5 million), was rated Caa2, and had
the following underlying collateral characteristics: 82%
originated in 2004, and 18% originated in 2005. The ratings of
the securities detailed above represent the lowest rating for
each security received from the rating agencies of Moodys,
Standard & Poors, and Fitch. The Company
continues to receive principal and interest payments in
accordance with the contractual terms of each of these
securities. Management has evaluated, among other things,
delinquency status, location of collateral, estimated prepayment
speeds, and the estimated default rates and loss severity in
liquidating the underlying collateral for these two securities.
As a result of managements evaluation of these securities,
the Company recognized, during the quarter ended
September 30, 2010,
other-than-temporary
impairment of $962,000 on the $5.7 million security that
was rated Caa2. Since management does not have the intent to
sell the security, and believes it is more likely than not that
the Company will not be required to sell the security, before
its anticipated recovery
87
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(which may be at maturity), the credit component of $154,000 was
recognized in earnings, and the non-credit component of $808,000
was recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of tax.
In evaluating the range of likely cash flows for the impaired
private label security, the Company applied security specific
and market assumptions, based on the credit characteristics of
the security to a cash flow model. Under certain stress
scenarios estimated future losses may arise. For the security in
which the Company recorded
other-than-temporary
impairment in the third quarter of 2010, the average portfolio
FICO score at origination was 724 and the weighted average loan
to value ratio was 68.7%. Cash flow assumptions incorporated an
expected constant default rate of 6.3% and an ultimate loss on
disposition of underlying collateral of 52.6%. The
securitys cash flows were discounted at the
securitys effective interest rate (the yield expected to
be earned at date of purchase). Although management recognized
other-than-temporary
impairment charges on this security, the security continues to
receive principal and interest payments in accordance with its
contractual terms. For the pass-through non-GSE mortgage-backed
security in which the Company recorded
other-than-temporary
impairment in the third quarter of 2009, the average portfolio
FICO score at origination was 740 and the weighted average loan
to value ratio was 70.3%. In evaluating the likely cash flows of
this security, the Company applied security specific assumptions
that included an expected constant default rate of 6.8% and an
ultimate loss on disposition of underlying collateral of 47.4%.
The securitys cash flows were discounted at the
securitys effective interest rate (the yield expected to
be earned at date of purchase).
The Company held one REMIC non-GSE mortgage-backed security that
was in a continuous unrealized loss position of greater than
twelve months, and one corporate bond, one equity security, and
sixteen REMIC mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by
GSEs that were in an unrealized loss position of less than
twelve months, and rated investment grade at December 31,
2010. The declines in value relate to the general interest rate
environment and are considered temporary. The securities cannot
be prepaid in a manner that would result in the Company not
receiving substantially all of its amortized cost. The Company
neither has an intent to sell, nor is it more likely than not
that the Company will be required to sell, the securities before
the recovery of their amortized cost basis or, if necessary,
maturity.
The fair values of our investment securities could decline in
the future if the underlying performance of the collateral for
the collateralized mortgage obligations or other securities
deteriorates and our credit enhancement levels do not provide
sufficient protections to our contractual principal and
interest. As a result, there is a risk that significant
other-than-temporary
impairments may occur in the future given the current economic
environment.
|
|
(3)
|
Securities
Held-to-Maturity
|
The following is a comparative summary of mortgage-backed
securities
held-to-maturity
at December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
854
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
4,206
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
5,060
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
874
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
5,866
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
6,740
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company had gross
proceeds of $3,371,000 on sales of securities
held-to-maturity
with gross realized gains and gross realized losses of
approximately $210,000 and $0, respectively, which primarily
resulted from the sale of smaller balance (less than 15% of
original purchased principal) mortgage-backed securities. The
Company sells these smaller balance securities as the cost of
servicing becomes prohibitive. The Company did not sell any
held-to-maturity
securities during the years ended December 31, 2010 and
2008.
The fair values of our investment securities could decline in
the future if the underlying performance of the collateral for
the collateralized mortgage obligation or other securities
deteriorates and our credit enhancement levels do not provide
sufficient protections to our contractual principal and
interest. As a result, there is a risk that significant
other-than-temporary
impairments may occur in the future given the current economic
environment.
Loans
held-for-investment,
net, consists of the following at December 31, 2010 and
2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
339,321
|
|
|
|
327,802
|
|
One -to- four family residential
|
|
|
78,032
|
|
|
|
90,898
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
35,054
|
|
|
|
44,548
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
283,588
|
|
|
|
178,401
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
28,125
|
|
|
|
26,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
|
764,120
|
|
|
|
667,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
17,020
|
|
|
|
19,252
|
|
Insurance premium finance loans
|
|
|
44,517
|
|
|
|
40,382
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
held-for-investment
|
|
|
826,719
|
|
|
|
728,700
|
|
Deferred loan costs, net
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
held-for-investment,
net
|
|
|
827,591
|
|
|
|
729,269
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(21,819
|
)
|
|
|
(15,414
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
held-for-investment
|
|
$
|
805,772
|
|
|
|
713,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company had $1.2 million in loans
held-for-sale
at December 31, 2010. All loans held for sale are one -to-
four family residential mortgage loans. The Company did not have
any loans
held-for-sale
at December 31, 2009.
The Company does not have any lending programs commonly referred
to as subprime lending. Subprime lending generally targets
borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized
by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments,
bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity
as evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios.
The Company, through its principal subsidiary, the Bank,
serviced $52,071,000 and $73,800,000 of loans at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for Freddie Mac.
These one- to four-family residential mortgage real estate loans
were underwritten to Freddie Mac guidelines and to comply with
applicable federal, state, and local laws. At the time of the
closing of these loans the Company owned the loans and
subsequently sold them to Freddie Mac providing normal and
customary representations and warranties, including
representations and warranties related to compliance with
Freddie Mac underwriting standards. At the time of sale, the
loans were free from encumbrances except for the mortgages filed
for by the Company which, with other underwriting documents,
were subsequently assigned and delivered to Freddie Mac. At
December 31, 2010, substantially all of the loans serviced
for Freddie Mac were performing in accordance with their
contractual terms and management believes that it has no
material repurchase obligations associated with these loans.
Servicing of loans for others does not have a significant effect
on our financial position or results of operations.
We provide for loan losses based on the consistent application
of our documented allowance for loan loss methodology. Loan
losses are charged to the allowance for loans losses and
recoveries are credited to it. Additions to the allowance for
loan losses are provided by charges against income based on
various factors which, in our judgment, deserve current
recognition in estimating probable losses. Loan losses are
charged-off in the period the loans, or portion thereof, are
deemed uncollectible. Generally, the Company will record a loan
charge-off (including a partial charge-off) to reduce a loan to
the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, less cost
to sell, for collateral dependent loans. We regularly review the
loan portfolio and make adjustments for loan losses in order to
maintain the allowance for loan losses in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). The allowance for loan losses consists
primarily of the following two components:
(1) Allowances are established for impaired loans
(generally defined by the company as non-accrual loans with an
outstanding balance of $500,000 or greater). The amount of
impairment provided for as an allowance is represented by the
deficiency, if any, between the present value of expected future
cash flows discounted at the original loans effective
interest rate or the underlying collateral value (less estimated
costs to sell,) if the loan is collateral dependent, and the
carrying value of the loan. Impaired loans that have no
impairment losses are not considered for general valuation
allowances described below.
(2) General allowances are established for loan losses on a
portfolio basis for loans that do not meet the definition of
impaired. The portfolio is grouped into similar risk
characteristics, primarily loan type,
loan-to-value,
if collateral dependent, and internal credit risk ratings. We
apply an estimated loss rate to each loan group. The loss rates
applied are based on our cumulative prior two year loss
experience adjusted, as appropriate, for the environmental
factors discussed below. This evaluation is inherently
subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be
susceptible to significant revisions based upon changes in
economic and real estate market conditions. Actual loan losses
may be significantly more than the allowance for loan losses we
have established, which could have a material negative effect on
our financial results. Within general allowances is an
unallocated reserve established to recognize losses related to
the inherent subjective nature of the appraisal process and the
internal credit risk rating process.
90
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In underwriting a loan secured by real property, we require an
appraisal (or an automated valuation model) of the property by
an independent licensed appraiser approved by the Companys
board of directors. The appraisal is subject to review by an
independent third party hired by the Company. We review and
inspect properties before disbursement of funds during the term
of a construction loan. Generally, management obtains updated
appraisals when a loan is deemed impaired. These appraisals may
be more limited than those prepared for the underwriting of a
new loan. In addition, when the Company acquires other real
estate owned, it generally obtains a current appraisal to
substantiate the net carrying value of the asset.
The adjustments to our loss experience are based on our
evaluation of several environmental factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in local, regional, national, and international economic
and business conditions and developments that affect the
collectibility of our portfolio, including the condition of
various market segments;
|
|
|
|
changes in the nature and volume of our portfolio and in the
terms of our loans;
|
|
|
|
changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending
management and other relevant staff;
|
|
|
|
changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume
of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely
classified or graded loans;
|
|
|
|
changes in the quality of our loan review system;
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of underlying collateral for
collateral-dependent loans;
|
|
|
|
the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and
changes in the level of such concentrations; and
|
|
|
|
the effect of other external factors such as competition and
legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated
credit losses in our existing portfolio.
|
In evaluating the estimated loss factors to be utilized for each
loan group, management also reviews actual loss history over an
extended period of time as reported by the OTS and FDIC for
institutions both in our market area and nationally for periods
that are believed to have experienced similar economic
conditions.
We evaluate the allowance for loan losses based on the combined
total of the impaired and general components. Generally when the
loan portfolio increases, absent other factors, our allowance
for loan loss methodology results in a higher dollar amount of
estimated probable losses. Conversely, when the loan portfolio
decreases, absent other factors, our allowance for loan loss
methodology results in a lower dollar amount of estimated
probable losses.
Each quarter we evaluate the allowance for loan losses and
adjust the allowance as appropriate through a provision for loan
losses. While we use the best information available to make
evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance may be
necessary if conditions differ substantially from the
information used in making the evaluations. In addition, as an
integral part of their examination process, the Office of Thrift
Supervision will periodically review the allowance for loan
losses. The Office of Thrift Supervision may require us to
adjust the allowance based on their analysis of information
available to them at the time of their examination. Our last
examination was as of September 30, 2010.
91
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
A summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
15,414
|
|
|
|
8,778
|
|
|
|
5,636
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
10,084
|
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(3,699
|
)
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
21,819
|
|
|
|
15,414
|
|
|
|
8,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for
loan losses, by loan type, for the year ended December 31,
2010. The following table also details the amount of loans
receivable, net of deferred loan fees and costs, that are
evaluated individually, and collectively, for impairment, and
the related portion of allowance for loan losses that is
allocated to each loan portfolio segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One -to-
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Lines of
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Four Family
|
|
|
and Land
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
8,403
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
$
|
15,414
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(987
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(2,132
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,699
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
5,238
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
5,403
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(1,122
|
)
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
10,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
1,855
|
|
|
|
5,137
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
$
|
21,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
10,525
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
1,819
|
|
|
|
5,016
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
$
|
19,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
339,259
|
|
|
|
78,109
|
|
|
|
35,077
|
|
|
|
284,199
|
|
|
|
28,337
|
|
|
|
17,032
|
|
|
|
44,517
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
827,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
51,324
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
4,562
|
|
|
|
5,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
63,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
287,935
|
|
|
|
76,359
|
|
|
|
30,515
|
|
|
|
279,116
|
|
|
|
28,337
|
|
|
|
16,532
|
|
|
|
44,517
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
764,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company continuously monitors the credit quality of its loan
receivables in an ongoing manner. Credit quality is monitored by
reviewing certain credit quality indicators. Management has
determined that
loan-to-value
ratios (at period end) and internally assigned credit risk
ratings by loan type are the key credit quality indicators that
best help management monitor the credit quality of the
Companys loan receivables.
Loan-to-value
(LTV) ratios used by management in monitoring credit quality are
based on current period loan balances and original values at
time of origination (unless a current appraisal has been
obtained as a result of the loan being deemed impaired). In
calculating the provision for loan losses, management has
determined that
92
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
commercial real estate loans and multifamily loans having
loan-to-value
ratios of less than 35%, and one -to- four family loans having
loan-to-value
ratios of less than 60%, require no allowance for loan losses at
each period end. If any such loans were to default, requiring
the Company to repossess the collateral, no loss would be
expected as the Company would be well secured.
The Company has also adopted a credit risk rating system as part
of the risk assessment of its loan portfolio. The Companys
lending officers are required to assign a credit risk rating to
each loan in their portfolio at origination. When the lender
learns of important financial developments, the risk rating is
reviewed accordingly, and adjusted if necessary. Monthly,
management presents monitored assets to the loan committee. In
addition, the Company engages a third party independent loan
reviewer that performs semi-annual reviews of a sample of loans,
validating the credit risk ratings assigned to such loans. The
credit risk ratings play an important role in the establishment
of the loan loss provision and to confirm the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses. After determining the general reserve
loss factor for each portfolio segment, the portfolio segment
balance collectively evaluated for impairment is multiplied by
the general reserve loss factor for the respective portfolio
segment in order to determine the general reserve. Loans that
have an internal credit rating of special mention or substandard
are multiplied by a multiple of the general reserve loss factors
for each portfolio segment, in order to determine the general
reserve.
When assigning a risk rating to a loan, management utilizes the
Banks internal nine-point credit risk rating system.
1. Strong
2. Good
3. Acceptable
4. Adequate
5. Watch
6. Special Mention
7. Substandard
8. Doubtful
9. Loss
Loans rated 1 5 are considered pass ratings. An
asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected
by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or
of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets have well
defined weaknesses based on objective evidence, and are
characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will
sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets
classified as doubtful have all of the weaknesses inherent in
those classified substandard with the added characteristic that
the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full
highly questionable and improbable based on current
circumstances. Assets classified as loss are those considered
uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as
assets is not warranted. Assets which do not currently expose
the Company to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one
of the aforementioned categories, but possess weaknesses, are
required to be designated special mention.
93
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following table details the recorded investment of loans
receivable, net of deferred fees and costs, by loan type and
credit quality indicator at December 31, 2010 (in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
1-4 Family
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
and Lines of
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<35%LTV
|
|
|
=> 35% LTV
|
|
|
< 60% LTV
|
|
|
=> 60% LTV
|
|
|
and Land
|
|
|
< 35% LTV
|
|
|
=> 35% LTV
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
and Industrial
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Internal Risk Rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
24,826
|
|
|
|
248,759
|
|
|
|
49,928
|
|
|
|
22,247
|
|
|
|
24,767
|
|
|
|
18,880
|
|
|
|
256,948
|
|
|
|
28,042
|
|
|
|
14,110
|
|
|
|
44,149
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
733,717
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
12,108
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,233
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,108
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
50,568
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
2,355
|
|
|
|
9,182
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans Receivable, net
|
|
|
27,824
|
|
|
|
311,435
|
|
|
|
51,757
|
|
|
|
26,352
|
|
|
|
35,077
|
|
|
|
19,384
|
|
|
|
264,815
|
|
|
|
28,337
|
|
|
|
17,032
|
|
|
|
44,517
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
827,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in loans receivable are loans for which the accrual of
interest income has been discontinued due to deterioration in
the financial condition of the borrowers. The recorded
investment of these nonaccrual loans was $59.3 million and
$41.6 million at December 31, 2010, and
December 31, 2009, respectively. Generally, loans are
placed on non-accruing status when they become 90 days or
more delinquent, and remain on non-accrual status until they are
brought current, have six months of performance under the loan
terms, and factors indicating reasonable doubt about the timely
collection of payments no longer exist. Therefore, loans may be
current in accordance with their loan terms, or may be less than
90 days delinquent and still be on a non-accruing status.
These non-accrual amounts included loans deemed to be impaired
of $52.0 million and $36.8 million at
December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009,
respectively. Loans on non-accrual status with principal
balances less than $500,000, and therefore not meeting the
Companys definition of an impaired loan, amounted to
$7.3 million and $4.8 million at December 31,
2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively. Loans past due
ninety days or more and still accruing interest were
$1.6 million and $191,000 at December 31, 2010, and
December 31, 2009, respectively, and consisted of loans
that are well secured or in the process of renewal.
94
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following table sets forth the detail, and delinquency
status, of non-performing loans (non-accrual loans and loans
past due ninety days or more and still accruing), net of
deferred fees and costs, at December 31, 2010 (in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Accruing Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> 90 Days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
Total Non-
|
|
|
|
0-29 Days
|
|
|
30-89 Days
|
|
|
³
90 Days
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Performing
|
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Accruing
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
LTV > 35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
13,650
|
|
|
|
15,050
|
|
|
|
17,659
|
|
|
|
46,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13,650
|
|
|
|
15,050
|
|
|
|
17,659
|
|
|
|
46,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial
|
|
|
13,679
|
|
|
|
15,050
|
|
|
|
17,659
|
|
|
|
46,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 60%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
LTV > 60%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
one-to-four
family residential
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
2,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
5,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction and land
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
5,122
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
5,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
LTV > 35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
4,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total multifamily
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
4,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit Substandard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
1,056
|
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premium loans Substandard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total insurance premium loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Performing Loans
|
|
$
|
17,790
|
|
|
|
18,874
|
|
|
|
22,617
|
|
|
|
59,281
|
|
|
|
1,609
|
|
|
|
60,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following table sets forth the detail and delinquency status
of loans receivable, net of deferred fees and costs, by
performing and non-performing loans at December 31, 2010
(in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing (Accruing) Loans
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-29 Days Past
|
|
|
30-89 Days
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
|
Due
|
|
|
Past Due
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Receivable, net
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
24,823
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
24,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,826
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
25,891
|
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
|
|
27,795
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
27,824
|
|
LTV > 35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
242,131
|
|
|
|
6,628
|
|
|
|
248,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,759
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
11,670
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
12,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,108
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
4,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,209
|
|
|
|
46,359
|
|
|
|
50,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
258,010
|
|
|
|
7,066
|
|
|
|
265,076
|
|
|
|
46,359
|
|
|
|
311,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial
|
|
|
283,901
|
|
|
|
8,970
|
|
|
|
292,871
|
|
|
|
46,388
|
|
|
|
339,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 60%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
48,930
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
49,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,928
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
49,013
|
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
|
50,770
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
51,757
|
|
LTV > 60%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
21,429
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
22,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,247
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
2,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
24,138
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
24,956
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
26,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
one-to-four
family residential
|
|
|
73,151
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
75,726
|
|
|
|
2,383
|
|
|
|
78,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
24,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,767
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
4,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,060
|
|
|
|
5,122
|
|
|
|
9,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction and land
|
|
|
29,052
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
29,551
|
|
|
|
5,526
|
|
|
|
35,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
18,656
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
18,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,880
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18,656
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
18,880
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
19,384
|
|
LTV > 35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
251,129
|
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
|
256,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,948
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
3,258
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
3,409
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
5,233
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
254,486
|
|
|
|
5,970
|
|
|
|
260,456
|
|
|
|
4,359
|
|
|
|
264,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total multifamily
|
|
|
273,142
|
|
|
|
6,194
|
|
|
|
279,336
|
|
|
|
4,863
|
|
|
|
284,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
27,780
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
28,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,042
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
27,835
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
28,097
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
28,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
13,626
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
14,072
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
14,110
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
15,135
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
15,671
|
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
17,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premium loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
43,728
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
44,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,149
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total insurance premium loans
|
|
|
43,728
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
44,388
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
44,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other loans
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
746,903
|
|
|
|
19,798
|
|
|
|
766,701
|
|
|
|
60,890
|
|
|
|
827,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following table summarizes impaired loans as of
December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
With No Allowance Recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV > 35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
4,807
|
|
|
|
4,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
25,590
|
|
|
|
26,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV < 35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV > 35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
3,392
|
|
|
|
5,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
With a Related Allowance Recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV > 35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
20,766
|
|
|
|
21,782
|
|
|
|
(2,129
|
)
|
One-to-four
family residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV > 60%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
3,079
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTV > 35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
1,632
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
51,824
|
|
|
|
54,120
|
|
|
|
(2,129
|
)
|
One-to-four
family residential
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
4,562
|
|
|
|
5,495
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
5,083
|
|
|
|
7,378
|
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
63,219
|
|
|
|
68,743
|
|
|
|
(2,655
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, the recorded investment of impaired
loans was $44.1 million, with related allowances of
$2.4 million.
Included in the table above at December 31, 2010, are loans
with carrying balances of $24.8 million that were not
written down by either charge-offs or specific reserves in our
allowance for loan losses. Included in the $44.1 million of
impaired loans at December 31, 2009, are loans with
carrying balances of $12.7 million that were not written
down either by charge-offs or specific reserves in our allowance
for loan losses. Loans not written down by charge-offs or
specific reserves at December 31, 2010, and 2009, have
sufficient collateral values, less costs to sell, supporting the
carrying balances of the loans.
The average recorded balance of impaired loans for the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 was approximately
$54.3 million, $27.2 million, and $7.0 million,
respectively. The Company recorded $2.8 million and
$624,000 of interest income on impaired loans for the years
ended December 31, 2010 and
97
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
2009, respectively. The Company did not record any interest
income on impaired loans for the year ended December 31,
2008.
As of December 31, 2010, we serviced $52.1 million of
loans for Freddie Mac. These one- to four-family residential
mortgage real estate loans were underwritten to Freddie Mac
guidelines and to comply with applicable federal, state, and
local laws. At the time of the closing of these loans the
Company owned the loans and subsequently sold them to Freddie
Mac providing normal and customary representations and
warranties, including representations and warranties related to
compliance with Freddie Mac underwriting standards. At the time
of sale, the loans were free from encumbrances except for the
mortgages filed by the Company which, with other underwriting
documents, were subsequently assigned and delivered to Freddie
Mac. At December 31, 2010, substantially all of the loans
serviced for Freddie Mac were performing in accordance with
their contractual terms and management believes that it has no
material repurchase obligations associated with these loans.
|
|
(5)
|
Premises
and Equipment, Net
|
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, premises and equipment, less
accumulated depreciation and amortization, consists of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
436
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
3,270
|
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
|
|
13,724
|
|
|
|
12,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
14,807
|
|
|
|
10,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,837
|
|
|
|
29,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(18,780
|
)
|
|
|
(17,249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
16,057
|
|
|
|
12,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009, and 2008 was $1,791,000, $1,679,000, and $1,490,000,
respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company
recognized a gain of approximately $197,000 as a result of the
sale of premises and equipment. The Company had no sales of
premises and equipment in 2009 and 2008.
98
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Deposit account balances at December 31, 2010 and 2009, are
summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negotiable orders of withdrawal
|
|
$
|
76,251
|
|
|
|
1.03
|
%
|
|
$
|
62,904
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
Non-interest bearing checking
|
|
|
111,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total transaction
|
|
|
187,664
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
172,919
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market
|
|
|
294,003
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
195,055
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
338,140
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
369,538
|
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total savings
|
|
|
632,143
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
564,593
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under $100,000
|
|
|
272,266
|
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
302,869
|
|
|
|
2.02
|
|
$100,000 or more
|
|
|
280,769
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
276,504
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certificates of deposit
|
|
|
553,035
|
|
|
|
1.29
|
|
|
|
579,373
|
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
1,372,842
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,316,885
|
|
|
|
1.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had brokered deposits (classified as certificates of
deposit in the above table) of $68.4 million and
$54.8 million, at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit at
December 31, 2010, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
473,989
|
|
2012
|
|
|
15,964
|
|
2013
|
|
|
5,650
|
|
2014
|
|
|
24,243
|
|
2015 and after
|
|
|
33,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
553,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on deposits for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 is summarized as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Negotiable orders of withdrawal and money market
|
|
$
|
3,546
|
|
|
|
3,213
|
|
|
|
3,147
|
|
Savings-passbook, statement, and tiered
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
|
|
2,833
|
|
|
|
2,719
|
|
Certificates of deposits
|
|
|
8,454
|
|
|
|
12,168
|
|
|
|
12,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,573
|
|
|
|
18,214
|
|
|
|
18,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
(7)
|
Securities
Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other
Borrowings
|
Borrowings consisted of Securities Sold under Agreements to
Repurchase, FHLB advances, and obligations under capital leases
and are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
$
|
243,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
146,300
|
|
|
|
71,300
|
|
Over-night borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
391,237
|
|
|
|
279,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances are secured by a blanket lien on unencumbered
securities and the Companys investment in FHLB capital
stock.
Repurchase agreements and FHLB advances have contractual
maturities at December 31, 2010, as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
FHLB
|
|
|
Repurchase
|
|
|
|
Advances
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
59,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
2012
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
2013
|
|
|
19,300
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
2015 and after
|
|
|
52,500
|
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
146,300
|
|
|
|
243,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Banks repurchase agreements have a weighted average
rate of 2.14%. The Bank has $40.0 million of repurchase
agreements that mature in less than 30 days,
$15.0 million that mature in 30 to 90 days, with the
remaining $91.3 million maturing in more than 90 days.
The repurchase agreements are secured primarily by
mortgage-backed securities with an amortized cost of
$266.2 million, and a market value of $275.7 million,
at December 31, 2010.
The Company has the ability to obtain additional funding from
the FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank discount window of
approximately $402.2 million, utilizing unencumbered
securities of $442.4 million at December 31, 2010. The
Company expects to have sufficient funds available to meet
current commitments in the normal course of business.
100
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Interest expense on borrowings for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 are summarized as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Repurchase Agreements
|
|
$
|
9,116
|
|
|
|
7,158
|
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
3,358
|
|
|
|
6,655
|
|
Over-night borrowings
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,833
|
|
|
|
10,763
|
|
|
|
9,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 consists of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Federal tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
8,114
|
|
|
|
9,434
|
|
|
|
6,130
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(1,315
|
)
|
|
|
(3,758
|
)
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,799
|
|
|
|
5,676
|
|
|
|
6,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(1,590
|
)
|
|
|
(1,180
|
)
|
|
|
(456
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(429
|
)
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
$
|
6,370
|
|
|
|
6,618
|
|
|
|
7,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has recognized deferred income tax (benefit) expense
related to changes in unrealized gains and losses on securities
available-for-sale
of ($1,090,000), $8,473,000, and $2,428,000, in 2010, 2009, and
2008, respectively. Such amounts are recorded as a component of
comprehensive income in the consolidated statements of changes
in stockholders equity.
The Company has also recognized an income tax expense related to
net actuarial losses from other postretirement benefits of
$26,000, $26,000, and $28,000 in 2010, 2009, and 2008,
respectively. Such amounts are recorded as a component of
accumulated comprehensive income in the consolidated statements
of changes in stockholders equity.
101
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Reconciliation between the amount of reported total income tax
expense and the amount computed by multiplying the applicable
statutory income tax rate for the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009, and 2008 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Tax expense at statutory rate of 35%
|
|
$
|
7,057
|
|
|
|
6,542
|
|
|
|
8,054
|
|
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State tax, net of federal income tax
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
(796
|
)
|
|
|
(613
|
)
|
|
|
(1,482
|
)
|
Incentive stock options
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$
|
6,370
|
|
|
|
6,618
|
|
|
|
7,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax
liabilities at December 31, 2010 and 2009, are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
8,838
|
|
|
|
6,346
|
|
Deferred loan fees
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Capitalized leases
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
886
|
|
Charitable deduction carryforward
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
Accrued salaries
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
Equity awards
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
Unrealized actuarial losses on post retirement benefits
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Straight-line leases adjustment
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Reserve for accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
1,304
|
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
Reserve for loan commitments
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
New Jersey NOL
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
19,070
|
|
|
|
16,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Unrealized gains on securities AFS
|
|
|
7,468
|
|
|
|
8,558
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Step up to fair market value of acquired loans
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
Step up to fair market value of acquired investment
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
7,916
|
|
|
|
9,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
10,116
|
|
|
|
6,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has determined that a valuation allowance should be
established for certain state and local tax benefits related to
the Companys contribution to the Northfield Bank
Foundation. The Company has determined that it is not required
to establish a valuation reserve for the remaining net deferred
tax asset account since it is more likely than not
that the net deferred tax assets will be realized through future
reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future
taxable income and tax planning strategies. The conclusion that
it is more likely than not that the remaining net
deferred tax assets will be realized is based on the history of
earnings and the prospects for continued profitability.
Management will continue to review the tax criteria related to
the recognition of deferred tax assets.
Certain amendments to the Federal, New York State, and New York
City tax laws regarding bad debt deductions were enacted in July
1996, August 1996, and March 1997, respectively. The Federal
amendments
103
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
include elimination of the
percentage-of-taxable-income
method for tax years beginning after December 31, 1995, and
imposition of a requirement to recapture into taxable income
(over a six-year period) the bad debt reserves in excess of the
base-year amounts. The New York State and City amendments
redesignated the Companys state and city bad debt reserves
at December 31, 1995, as the base-year amount and also
provided for future additions to the base-year reserve using the
percentage-of-taxable-income
method.
The Companys Federal, state, and city base-year reserves
were approximately $5,900,000, respectively, at
December 31, 2010 and 2009. Under the tax laws as amended,
events that would result in taxation of certain of these
reserves include the following: (a) the Companys
retained earnings represented by this reserve are used for
purposes other than to absorb losses from bad debts, including
excess dividends or distributions in liquidation; (b) the
Company redeems its stock; (c) the Company fails to meet
the definition of a bank for Federal purposes or a thrift for
state and city purposes; or (d) there is a change in the
federal, state, or city tax laws. At December 31, 2005, the
Companys unrecognized deferred tax liabilities with
respect to its base-year reserves for Federal, state, and city
taxes totaled approximately $2,800,000. Deferred tax liabilities
have not been recognized with respect to the 1987 base-year
reserves, since the Company does not expect that these amounts
will become taxable in the foreseeable future.
At December 31, 2005, the Company did not meet the
definition of a thrift for New York State and City purposes, and
as a result, recorded a state and local tax expense of
approximately $2,200,000 pertaining to the recapture of the
state and city base-year reserves accumulated after
December 31, 1987.
The Company did not have any uncertain tax positions for the
years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
The Company records interest accrued related to uncertain tax
benefits as tax expense. During the year ended December 31,
2008, the Company accrued $62,000 in interest on uncertain tax
positions. The Company records any penalties accrued as other
expenses. The Company has not incurred any tax penalties.
The State of New York passed legislation in August of 2010 to
conform the bad debt deduction allowed under Article 32 of
the New York State tax law to the bad debt deduction allowed for
federal income tax purposes. As a result, Northfield Bank no
longer establishes, or maintains, a New York reserve for losses
on loans, and is required to claim a deduction for bad debts in
an amount equal to its actual loan loss experience. In addition,
this legislation eliminated the potential recapture of the New
York tax bad debt reserve that could have otherwise occurred in
certain circumstances under New York State tax law prior to
August of 2010. As a result of this new legislation, the Company
reversed approximately $738,000 in deferred tax liabilities
during the third quarter of 2010.
The Company has a 401(k) plan for its employees, which grants
eligible employees (those salaried employees with at least one
year of service) the opportunity to invest from 2% to 15% of
their base compensation in certain investment alternatives. The
Company contributes an amount equal to 25% of employee
contributions on the first 6% of base compensation contributed
by eligible employees for the first three years of
participation. Subsequent years of participation in excess of
three years will increase the Company matching contribution from
25% to 50% of an employees contributions, on the first 6%
of base compensation contributed by eligible employees. A member
becomes fully vested in the Companys contributions upon
(a) completion of five years of service, or (b) normal
retirement, early retirement, permanent disability, or death.
The Companys contribution to this plan amounted to
approximately $166,000, $156,000, and $166,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
The Company also maintains a profit-sharing plan in which the
Company can contribute to the participants 401(k) account,
at its discretion, up to the legal limit of the Internal Revenue
Code. The Company did not contribute to the profit sharing plan
during 2010, 2009 and 2008.
104
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The Company maintains the Northfield Bank Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (the ESOP). The ESOP is a tax-qualified plan
designed to invest primarily in the Companys common stock.
The ESOP provides employees with the opportunity to receive a
funded retirement benefit from the Bank, based primarily on the
value of the Companys common stock. The ESOP was
authorized to, and did purchase, 1,756,279 shares of the
Companys common stock in the Companys initial public
offering at a price of $10.00 per share. This purchase was
funded with a loan from Northfield Bancorp, Inc. to the ESOP.
The first payment on the loan from the ESOP to the Company was
due and paid on December 31, 2007, and the outstanding
balance at December 31, 2010 and 2009, was
$15.4 million and $15.8 million, respectively. The
shares of the Companys common stock purchased in the
initial public offering are pledged as collateral for the loan.
Shares are released for allocation to participants as loan
payments are made. A total of 60,570 and 58,539 shares were
released and allocated to participants for the ESOP year ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. ESOP compensation
expense for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and
2008 was $774,000, $676,000, and $644,000, respectively. Cash
dividends on unallocated shares are utilized to satisfy required
debt payments. Dividends on allocated shares are utilized to
prepay debt which releases additional shares to participants.
The Company maintains a Supplemental Employee Stock Ownership
Plan (the SESOP), a non-qualified plan, that provides
supplemental benefits to certain executives who are prevented
from receiving the full benefits contemplated by the ESOPs
benefit formula due to tax law limits for tax-qualified plans.
The supplemental payments for the SESOP consist of cash payments
representing the value of Company shares that cannot be
allocated to participants under the ESOP due to legal
limitations imposed on tax-qualified plans. The Company made a
contribution to the SESOP plan of $33,000, $41,000, and $54,000
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008,
respectively.
The Company provides post retirement medical and life insurance
to a limited number of retired individuals. The Company also
provides retiree life insurance benefits to all qualified
employees, up to certain limits. The following tables set forth
the funded status and components of postretirement benefit costs
at December 31 measurement dates (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,670
|
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation end of year
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
1,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liability (included in accrued expenses and other
liabilities)
|
|
$
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
1,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following table sets forth the amounts recognized in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
471
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net loss, transition obligation, and prior service
cost that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) into net periodic cost in 2011 are $25,182,
$16,711, and $15,575, respectively.
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic
postretirement benefit costs for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Amortization of transition obligation
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Amortization of prior service costs
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized loss
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement benefit cost included in compensation and
employee benefits
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumed discount rate related to plan obligations reflects
the weighted average of published market rates for high-quality
corporate bonds with terms similar to those of the plans
expected benefit payments, rounded to the nearest quarter
percentage point. The Companys discount rate and rate of
compensation increase used in accounting for the plan are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at period end:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
Rate of increase in compensation
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the
year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
Rate of increase in compensation
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
At December 31, 2010, a medical cost trend rate of 8.75%
for 2010, decreasing 0.50% per year thereafter until an ultimate
rate of 4.75% is reached, was used in the plans valuation.
At December 31, 2009, a medical cost trend rate of 9.00%
for 2009, decreasing 0.50% per year thereafter until an ultimate
rate of 5.00% is reached, was used in the plans valuation.
The Companys healthcare cost trend rates are based, among
other things, on the Companys own experience and third
party analysis of recent and projected healthcare cost trends.
106
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
A one percentage-point change in assumed heath care cost trends
would have the following effects (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Percentage Point Increase
|
|
One Percentage Point Decrease
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Effect on benefits earned and interest cost
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
A one percentage-point change in assumed heath care cost trends
would have the following effects (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Percentage
|
|
|
One Percentage
|
|
|
|
Point Increase
|
|
|
Point Decrease
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Aggregate of service and interest components of net periodic
cost (benefit)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Benefit payments of approximately $108,000, $97,000, and $88,000
were made in 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. The benefits
expected to be paid under the postretirement health benefits
plan for the next five years are as follows: $118,000 in 2011;
$123,000 in 2012; $127,000 in 2013; $131,000 in 2014; and
$133,000 in 2015. The benefit payments expected to be paid in
the aggregate for the years 2016 through 2020 are $661,000. The
expected benefits are based on the same assumptions used to
measure the Companys benefit obligation at
December 31, 2010, and include estimated future employee
service.
The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization
Act of 2003, or Medicare Act, introduced both a Medicare
prescription-drug benefit and a federal subsidy to sponsors of
retiree health-care plans that provide a benefit at least
actuarially equivalent to the Medicare benefit. The
Company has evaluated the estimated potential subsidy available
under the Medicare Act and the related costs associated with
qualifying for the subsidy. Due to the limited number of
participants in the plan, the Company has concluded that it is
not cost beneficial to apply for the subsidy. Therefore, the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation information and
related net periodic postretirement benefit costs do not reflect
the effect of any potential subsidy.
On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed into law the
comprehensive reform legislation, the Protection and Affordable
Care Act (PPACA). Based on the Companys participant group
and coverage currently provided to participants, the legislation
had not material effect on the actuarial calculations related to
the Companys plan liabilities and related expenses.
The Company maintains a nonqualified plan to provide for the
elective deferral of all or a portion of director fees by
members of the participating board of directors, deferral of all
or a portion of the compensation
and/or
annual incentive compensation payable to eligible employees of
the Company, and to provide to certain officers of the Company
benefits in excess of those permitted to be paid by the
Companys savings plan, ESOP, and profit-sharing plan under
the applicable Internal Revenue Code. The plan obligation was
approximately $4,095,000 and $3,403,000 at December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively, and is included in accrued expenses
and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Expense (income) under this plan was $597,000, $592,000, and
$(1,331,000) for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009,
and 2008, respectively. The Company invests to fund this future
obligation, in various mutual funds designated as trading
securities. The securities are
marked-to-market
through current period earnings as a component of non-interest
income. Accrued obligations under this plan are credited or
charged with the return on the trading securities portfolio as a
component of compensation and benefits expense.
The Company entered into a supplemental retirement agreement
with its former president and current director on July 18,
2006. The agreement provides for 120 monthly payments of
$17,450. The present value
107
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
of the obligation, of approximately $1,625,000, was recorded in
compensation and benefits expense in 2006. The present value of
the obligation as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, was
approximately $1,039,000 and $1,190,000, respectively.
|
|
(10)
|
Equity
Incentive Plan
|
The Company maintains the Northfield Bancorp, Inc. 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan to grant common stock or options to purchase
common stock at specific prices to directors and employees of
the Company. The Plan provides for the issuance or delivery of
up to 3,073,488 shares of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. common
stock subject to certain Plan limitations. On January 30,
2009, certain officers and employees of the Company were granted
an aggregate of 1,478,900 stock options and 582,700 shares
of restricted stock, and non-employee directors received an
aggregate of 623,700 stock options and 249,750 shares of
restricted stock. On May 29, 2009, an employee was granted
3,800 stock options and 4,200 restricted stock awards. On
January 30, 2010, an employee was granted 3,000 stock
options and 4,400 restricted stock awards. All stock options and
restricted stock granted to date vests in equal installments
over a five year period beginning one year from the date of
grant. The vesting of options and restricted stock awards may
accelerate in accordance with terms of the plan. Stock options
were granted at an exercise price equal to the fair value of the
Companys common stock on the grant date based on quoted
market prices and all have an expiration period of ten years.
The fair value of stock options granted on January 30,
2009, was estimated utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing
model using the following assumptions: an expected life of
6.5 years utilizing the simplified method, risk-free rate
of return of 2.17%, volatility of 35.33% and a dividend yield of
1.61%. The fair value of stock options granted on May 29,
2009, was estimated utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing
model using the following assumptions: an expected life of
6.5 years utilizing the simplified method, risk-free rate
of return of 2.88%, volatility of 38.39% and a dividend yield of
1.50%. The fair value of stock options granted on
January 30, 2010, was estimated utilizing the Black-Scholes
option pricing model using the following assumptions: an
expected life of 6.5 years utilizing the simplified method,
risk-free rate of return of 2.90%, volatility of 38.29% and a
dividend yield of 1.81%. The Company is expensing the grant date
fair value of all employee and director share-based compensation
over the requisite service periods on a straight-line basis.
During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the
Company recorded $3.0 million and $2.9 million,
respectively, of stock-based compensation. There was no stock
based compensation during the year ended December 31, 2008.
The following table is a summary of the Companys
non-vested stock options as of December 31, 2010, and
changes therein during the year then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Outstanding- December 31, 2009
|
|
|
2,083,400
|
|
|
$
|
3.22
|
|
|
$
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
9.08
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
4.66
|
|
|
|
13.24
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(13,860
|
)
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding- December 31, 2010
|
|
|
2,072,540
|
|
|
$
|
3.22
|
|
|
$
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
8.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable- December 31, 2010
|
|
|
424,020
|
|
|
$
|
3.22
|
|
|
$
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
8.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected future stock option expense related to the non-vested
options outstanding as of December 31, 2010, is
$4.1 million over an average period of 3.1 years.
108
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following is a summary of the status of the Companys
restricted shares as of December 31, 2010, and changes
therein during the year then ended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Awarded
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
825,150
|
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
|
|
13.24
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(175,670
|
)
|
|
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
653,880
|
|
|
$
|
9.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected future stock award expense related to the non-vested
restricted awards as of December 31, 2010, is
$5.0 million over an average period of 3.1 years.
Upon the exercise of stock options, management expects to
utilize treasury stock as the source of issuance for these
shares.
|
|
(11)
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Company, in the normal course of business, is party to
commitments that involve, to varying degrees, elements of risk
in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated
financial statements. These commitments include unused lines of
credit and commitments to extend credit.
At December 31, 2010, the following commitment and
contingent liabilities existed that are not reflected in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
$
|
29,467
|
|
Unused lines of credit
|
|
|
32,759
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
181
|
|
The Companys maximum exposure to credit losses in the
event of nonperformance by the other party to these commitments
is represented by the contractual amount. The Company uses the
same credit policies in granting commitments and conditional
obligations as it does for amounts recorded in the consolidated
balance sheets. These commitments and obligations do not
necessarily represent future cash flow requirements. The Company
evaluates each customers creditworthiness on a
case-by-case
basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary,
is based on managements assessment of risk. Standby
letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the
Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third
party. The guarantees generally extend for a term of up to one
year and are fully collateralized. For each guarantee issued, if
the customer defaults on a payment to the third party, the
Company would have to perform under the guarantee. The
unamortized fee on standby letters of credit approximates their
fair value; such fees were insignificant at December 31,
2010. The Company maintains an allowance for estimated losses on
commitments to extend credit. At December 31, 2010 and
2009, the allowance was $366,000 and $266,000, respectively, and
is recorded as a component of other non-interest expense.
The Company, through its principal subsidiary, the Bank,
serviced $52,071,000 and $73,800,000 of loans at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for Freddie Mac.
These one- to four-family residential mortgage real estate loans
were underwritten to Freddie Mac guidelines and to comply with
applicable federal, state, and local laws. At the time of the
closing of these loans the Company owned the loans and
subsequently sold them to Freddie Mac providing normal and
customary representations and warranties, including
representations and warranties related to compliance with
Freddie Mac underwriting standards. At the time of sale, the
loans were free from encumbrances except for the mortgages filed
for by the Company which, with other underwriting documents,
were subsequently assigned and delivered to Freddie Mac. At
December 31, 2010,
109
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
substantially all of the loans serviced for Freddie Mac were
performing in accordance with their contractual terms and
management believes that it has no material repurchase
obligations associated with these loans.
At December 31, 2010, the Company was obligated under
non-cancelable operating leases and capitalized leases on
property used for banking purposes. Most leases contain
escalation clauses and renewal options which provide for
increased rentals as well as for increases in certain property
costs including real estate taxes, common area maintenance, and
insurance.
The projected minimum annual rental payments and receipts under
the capitalized leases and operating leases, are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Receipts
|
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Year ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
376
|
|
|
|
2,291
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
2012
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
2013
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
2014
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
2,094
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
2015
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
21,752
|
|
|
|
1,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
2,648
|
|
|
|
32,555
|
|
|
|
2,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net rental expense included in occupancy expense was
approximately $2,353,000, $2,128,000, and $1,466,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
In the normal course of business, the Company may be a party to
various outstanding legal proceedings and claims. In the opinion
of management, the consolidated financial statements will not be
materially affected by the outcome of such legal proceedings and
claims.
The Bank is required by regulation to maintain a certain level
of cash balances on hand
and/or on
deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. As of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Bank was required to
maintain balances of $700,000 and $483,000, respectively.
The Bank has entered into employment agreements with its Chief
Executive Officer and the other executive officers of the Bank
to ensure the continuity of executive leadership, to clarify the
roles and responsibilities of executives, and to make explicit
the terms and conditions of executive employment. These
agreements are for a term of three-years subject to review and
annual renewal, and provide for certain levels of base annual
salary and in the event of a change in control, as defined, or
in the event of termination, as defined, certain levels of base
salary, bonus payments, and benefits for a period of up to
three-years.
|
|
(12)
|
Regulatory
Requirements
|
The OTS requires banks to maintain a minimum tangible capital
ratio to tangible assets of 1.5%, a minimum core capital ratio
to total adjusted assets of 4.0%, and a minimum ratio of total
risk-adjusted total assets of 8.0%.
Under prompt corrective action regulations, the OTS is required
to take certain supervisory actions (and may take additional
discretionary actions) with respect to an undercapitalized
institution. Such actions could have a direct material effect on
the institutions financial statements. The regulations
establish a framework for the classification of savings
institutions into five categories: well capitalized, adequately
capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized,
and critically undercapitalized. Generally, an institution is
considered
110
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
well capitalized if it has a core capital ratio of at least 5%,
a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6%, and a
total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%.
The foregoing capital ratios are based in part on specific
quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain
off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory
accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications also
are subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about
capital components, risk weighting, and other factors.
Management believes that as of December 31, 2010, the Bank
met all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
Further, the most recent OTS notification categorized the Bank
as a well-capitalized institution under the prompt corrective
action regulations. There have been no conditions or events
since that notification that management believes have changed
the Banks capital classification.
Currently, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is regulated, supervised,
and examined by the OTS as a savings and loan holding company
and, as such, is not subject to regulatory capital requirements.
The Reform Act will require the federal banking agencies to
establish consolidated risk-based and leverage capital
requirements for insured depository institutions, depository
institution holding companies and systemically important nonbank
financial companies. These requirements must be no less than
those to which insured depository institutions are currently
subject. As a result, on the fifth anniversary of the effective
date of the Reform Act, we will become subject to consolidated
capital requirements which we have not been subject to
previously.
The following is a summary of Northfield Banks regulatory
capital amounts and ratios compared to the OTS requirements as
of December 31, 2010 and 2009, for classification as a
well-capitalized institution and minimum capital (dollars in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTS Requirements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For well
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequacy
|
|
|
Under Prompt Corrective
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Purposes
|
|
|
Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible capital to tangible assets
|
|
$
|
292,981
|
|
|
|
13.43
|
%
|
|
$
|
32,723
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital (core) (to adjusted total assets)
|
|
|
292,981
|
|
|
|
13.43
|
|
|
|
87,263
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
109,078
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Total capital (to risk- weighted assets)
|
|
|
307,375
|
|
|
|
27.39
|
|
|
|
89,751
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
112,188
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
As of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible capital to tangible assets
|
|
$
|
274,236
|
|
|
|
14.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
28,666
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital (core) (to adjusted total assets)
|
|
|
274,236
|
|
|
|
14.35
|
|
|
|
76,442
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
95,553
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Total capital (to risk- weighted assets)
|
|
|
287,085
|
|
|
|
28.52
|
|
|
|
80,529
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
100,661
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
Fair
Value of Measurement
|
The following table presents the assets reported on the
consolidated balance sheet at their estimated fair value as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, by level within the Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification. Financial assets and liabilities are
classified in their entirety based on the level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value
hierarchy is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs Unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement
date.
|
111
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs Inputs other than quoted prices
included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets,
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices
that are observable for the asset or liability (for example,
interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss
severities, credit risks and default rates) or inputs that are
derived principally from or corroborated by observable market
data by correlations or other means.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs Significant unobservable inputs
that reflect the Companys own assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.
|
The following tables summarize financial assets and financial
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, segregated by the level of the
valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to
measure fair value (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Measured on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
977,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
977,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
97,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
121,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE bonds
|
|
|
35,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
12,353
|
|
|
|
12,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
available-for-sale
|
|
|
1,244,313
|
|
|
|
12,353
|
|
|
|
1,231,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
4,095
|
|
|
|
4,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,248,408
|
|
|
|
16,448
|
|
|
|
1,231,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured on a non-recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage (CRE)
|
|
$
|
26,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,951
|
|
One- to- four family residential mortgage
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
4,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,526
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
2,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
|
35,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned (CRE)
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
35,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Measured on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
767,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
767,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
176,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
137,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE bonds
|
|
|
28,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
21,872
|
|
|
|
21,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
available-for-sale
|
|
|
1,131,803
|
|
|
|
21,872
|
|
|
|
1,109,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
3,403
|
|
|
|
3,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,135,206
|
|
|
|
25,275
|
|
|
|
1,109,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured on a non-recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
$
|
21,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,295
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
6,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,910
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
|
29,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned (CRE)
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
30,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available -for- Sale Securities: The estimated
fair values for mortgage-backed securities, GSE bonds, and
corporate securities are obtained from a nationally recognized
third-party pricing service. The estimated fair values are
derived primarily from cash flow models, which include
assumptions for interest rates, credit losses, and prepayment
speeds. Broker/dealer quotes are utilized as well when such
quotes are available and deemed representative of the market.
The significant inputs utilized in the cash flow models are
based on market data obtained from sources independent of the
Company (observable inputs,) and are therefore classified as
Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair
value of equity securities classified as Level 1, are
derived from quoted market prices in active markets. Equity
securities consist primarily of money market mutual funds. There
were no transfers of securities between Level 1 and
Level 2 during the year ended December 31, 2010.
Trading Securities: Fair values are derived
from quoted market prices in active markets. The assets consist
of publicly traded mutual funds.
In addition, the Company may be required, from time to time, to
measure the fair value of certain other financial assets on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. The
113
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of
lower-of-cost-or-market
accounting or write downs of individual assets.
Impaired Loans: At December 31, 2010, and
December 31, 2009, the Company had impaired loans with
outstanding principal balances of $38.4 million and
$31.4 million that were recorded at their estimated fair
value of $35.7 million and $29.0 million,
respectively. The Company recorded impairment charges of
$2.7 million and $2.4 million for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and charge-offs
of $3.7 million and $2.4 million for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, utilizing
Level 3 inputs. For purposes of estimating fair value of
impaired loans, management utilizes independent appraisals, if
the loan is collateral dependent, adjusted downward by
management, as necessary, for changes in relevant valuation
factors subsequent to the appraisal date, or the present value
of expected future cash flows for non-collateral dependent loans
and troubled debt restructurings.
Other Real Estate Owned: At December 31,
2010 and 2009, the Company had assets acquired through
foreclosure of $171,000 and $1.9 million, respectively,
recorded at estimated fair value, less estimated selling costs
when acquired, thus establishing a new cost basis. Fair value is
generally based on independent appraisals. These appraisals
include adjustments to comparable assets based on the
appraisers market knowledge and experience, and are
considered level 3 inputs. When an asset is acquired, the
excess of the loan balance over fair value, less estimated
selling costs, is charged to the allowance for loan losses. If
the estimated fair value of the asset declines, a write-down is
recorded through expense. The valuation of foreclosed assets is
subjective in nature and may be adjusted in the future because
of changes in the economic conditions.
Subsequent valuation adjustments to other real estate owned
(REO) totaled $146,000, for the year ended December 31,
2010, reflecting continued deterioration in estimated fair
values. The remaining reduction to REO was a result of sales.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company
transferred a loan with a principal balance of $1.9 million
and an estimated fair value, less costs to sell, of
$1.4 million to other real estate owned. During the year
ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded impairment
charges of $489,000 prior to the transfer of the loan to OREO
utilizing Level 3 inputs. Subsequent valuation adjustments
to other real estate owned totaled $516,000 and $0 for the years
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, reflective
of continued deterioration in estimated fair values. Operating
costs after acquisition are expensed.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The FASB Accounting Standards Topic for Financial Instruments
requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and
financial liabilities, including those financial assets and
financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair
value on a recurring or non-recurring basis. The methodologies
for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial
liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or
non-recurring basis are discussed above. The following methods
and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of other
financial assets and financial liabilities not already discussed
above:
|
|
(a)
|
Cash,
Cash Equivalents, and Certificates of Deposit
|
Cash and cash equivalents are short-term in nature with original
maturities of three months or less; the carrying amount
approximates fair value. Certificates of deposits having
original terms of six-months or less; carrying value generally
approximates fair value. Certificate of deposits with an
original maturity of six months or greater the fair value is
derived from discounted cash flows.
114
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
(b)
|
Securities
(Held to Maturity)
|
The fair values for substantially all of our securities are
obtained from an independent nationally recognized pricing
service. The independent pricing service utilizes market prices
of same or similar securities whenever such prices are
available. Prices involving distressed sellers are not utilized
in determining fair value. Where necessary, the independent
third-party pricing service estimates fair value using models
employing techniques such as discounted cash flow analyses. The
assumptions used in these models typically include assumptions
for interest rates, credit losses, and prepayments, utilizing
market observable data where available.
|
|
(c)
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York Stock
|
The fair value for Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock is
its carrying value, since this is the amount for which it could
be redeemed and there is no active market for this stock.
Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar
financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as
residential mortgage, construction, land, multifamily,
commercial and consumer. Each loan category is further segmented
into amortizing and
non-amortizing
and fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing
and nonperforming categories. The fair value of loans is
estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current
prepayment assumptions and current rates at which similar loans
would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for
the same remaining maturities. This method of estimating fair
value does not incorporate the exit price concept of fair value
prescribed by the FASB ASC Topic for Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures.
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as
non-interest-bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW and money
market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand. The
fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted
value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated
using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar
remaining maturities.
|
|
(f)
|
Commitments
to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit
|
The fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby
letters of credit are estimated using the fees currently charged
to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the
remaining terms of the agreements and the present
creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan
commitments, fair value also considers the difference between
current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The
fair value of off-balance-sheet commitments is insignificant and
therefore not included in the following table.
The fair value of borrowings is estimated by discounting future
cash flows based on rates currently available for debt with
similar terms and remaining maturity.
|
|
(h)
|
Advance
Payments by Borrowers
|
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance have no
stated maturity; the fair value is equal to the amount currently
payable.
115
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The estimated fair values of the Companys significant
financial instruments at December 31, 2010, and 2009, are
presented in the following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
43,852
|
|
|
|
43,852
|
|
|
|
42,544
|
|
|
|
42,544
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
4,095
|
|
|
|
4,095
|
|
|
|
3,403
|
|
|
|
3,403
|
|
Securities available-for sale
|
|
|
1,244,313
|
|
|
|
1,244,313
|
|
|
|
1,131,803
|
|
|
|
1,131,803
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
5,060
|
|
|
|
5,273
|
|
|
|
6,740
|
|
|
|
6,930
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost
|
|
|
9,784
|
|
|
|
9,784
|
|
|
|
6,421
|
|
|
|
6,421
|
|
Net loans
held-for-investment
|
|
|
805,772
|
|
|
|
818,295
|
|
|
|
713,855
|
|
|
|
726,475
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
1,372,842
|
|
|
|
1,377,068
|
|
|
|
1,316,885
|
|
|
|
1,319,612
|
|
Repurchase Agreements and other borrowings
|
|
|
391,237
|
|
|
|
403,920
|
|
|
|
279,424
|
|
|
|
288,737
|
|
Advance payments by borrowers
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
Limitations
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based
on relevant market information and information about the
financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium
or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time
the Companys entire holdings of a particular financial
instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion
of the Companys financial instruments, fair value
estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss
experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of
various financial instruments, and other factors. These
estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and
matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be
determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could
significantly affect the estimates.
Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and
off-balance-sheet financial instruments without attempting to
estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value
of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial
instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the
realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a
significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been
considered in the estimates.
|
|
(14)
|
Stock
Repurchase Program
|
On October 27, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company
authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the
Company intends to repurchase up to 2,177,033 shares,
representing approximately 5% of its then outstanding shares.
The timing of the repurchases will depend on certain factors,
including but not limited to, market conditions and prices, the
Companys liquidity and capital requirements, and
alternative uses of capital. Any repurchased shares will be held
as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate
purposes. The Company is conducting such repurchases in
accordance with a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. As of
December 31, 2010, a total of 224,567 shares were
purchased under this repurchase plan at a weighted average cost
of $12.76 per share.
116
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The Companys previous stock repurchase program that
commenced on February 13, 2009, was terminated on
June 4, 2010, in connection with the Companys
announcement that it intended to convert to a fully public
company. Under that program, the Company repurchased
367,881 shares of common stock at an average cost of $13.74
per share during 2010, and a total of 2,083,944 shares of
common stock at an average cost of $11.99 per share during the
life of the repurchase program.
The following is a summary of the Companys earnings per
share calculations and reconciliation of basic to diluted
earnings per share for the periods indicated (in thousands,
except share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
13,793
|
|
|
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic
|
|
|
41,387,106
|
|
|
|
42,405,774
|
|
|
|
43,133,856
|
|
Effect of non-vested restricted stock and stock options
outstanding
|
|
|
281,900
|
|
|
|
126,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted
|
|
|
41,669,006
|
|
|
|
42,532,568
|
|
|
|
43,133,856
|
|
Earnings per share-basic
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
Earnings per share-diluted
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
(16)
|
Postponement
of Plan of Conversion and Reorganization
|
The Boards of Directors of Northfield Bancorp, MHC and the
Company adopted a Plan of Conversion and Reorganization on
June 4, 2010. On September 30, 2010, Northfield
Bancorp, Inc., a federal corporation and the stock holding
company for Northfield Bank, announced due to the current market
conditions that Northfield Bancorp, Inc., the recently formed
Delaware corporation and proposed new holding company for
Northfield Bank, had postponed its stock offering in connection
with the second-step conversion of Northfield Bancorp, MHC.
In connection with the postponement of the offering, the
directors and executive officers of the Company were released
from the agreements they had executed with Sandler
ONeill & Partners, the Companys marketing
agent in connection with the offering, which restricted those
individuals from purchasing and selling the Companys
shares of common stock for a period of 90 days after the
completion of the offering. Such agreements would be reinstated
should the Company determine to re-commence the stock offering
in the future.
The Company expensed approximately $1.8 million in costs
incurred for the Companys postponed, second-step offering.
117
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
(17)
|
Parent-only
Financial Information
|
The following condensed parent company only financial
information reflects Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s investment
in its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary, Northfield Bank,
using the equity method of accounting.
Northfield
Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash in Northfield Bank
|
|
$
|
20,929
|
|
|
|
18,095
|
|
Interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
1,793
|
|
Investment in Northfield Bank
|
|
|
319,603
|
|
|
|
302,260
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
(corporate bonds)
|
|
|
37,472
|
|
|
|
50,511
|
|
ESOP loan receivable
|
|
|
15,392
|
|
|
|
15,798
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,392
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
396,951
|
|
|
|
391,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
396,717
|
|
|
|
391,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
396,951
|
|
|
|
391,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northfield
Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed
Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest on ESOP loan
|
|
$
|
513
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
Interest income on deposit in Northfield Bank
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
Interest income on deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
Interest income on corporate bonds
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Gain on securities transactions, net
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings of Northfield Bank
|
|
|
14,320
|
|
|
|
11,521
|
|
|
|
14,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income
|
|
|
16,249
|
|
|
|
13,513
|
|
|
|
17,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
13,793
|
|
|
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Northfield
Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
13,793
|
|
|
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
(846
|
)
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
1,064
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Increase in due to Northfield Bank
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
Decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
|
|
(1,154
|
)
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
Amortization of premium on corporate bond
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Gain on securities transactions, net
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Undistributed earnings of Northfield Bank
|
|
|
(14,320
|
)
|
|
|
(11,521
|
)
|
|
|
(14,103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
|
2,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend from Northfield Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of corporate bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,323
|
)
|
|
|
(4,468
|
)
|
Maturities of corporate bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of corporate bonds
|
|
|
12,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on ESOP loan receivable
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
Maturities (purchases) of certificate of deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,153
|
|
|
|
(23,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
12,494
|
|
|
|
(1,499
|
)
|
|
|
(27,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(8,213
|
)
|
|
|
(19,929
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(3,308
|
)
|
|
|
(2,963
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(11,521
|
)
|
|
|
(22,892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,699
|
|
|
|
(22,667
|
)
|
|
|
(25,869
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
19,888
|
|
|
|
42,555
|
|
|
|
68,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
21,587
|
|
|
|
19,888
|
|
|
|
42,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following tables are a summary of certain quarterly
financial data for the years ended December 31, 2010 and
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Selected Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
21,007
|
|
|
|
22,032
|
|
|
|
21,682
|
|
|
|
21,774
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6,458
|
|
|
|
6,115
|
|
|
|
6,004
|
|
|
|
5,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
14,549
|
|
|
|
15,917
|
|
|
|
15,678
|
|
|
|
15,945
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
2,798
|
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
1,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
12,619
|
|
|
|
13,119
|
|
|
|
12,280
|
|
|
|
13,987
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,723
|
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
9,121
|
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
11,171
|
|
|
|
9,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
5,221
|
|
|
|
6,528
|
|
|
|
2,610
|
|
|
|
5,804
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
2,342
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
3,381
|
|
|
|
4,186
|
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
3,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share- basis and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
20,482
|
|
|
|
21,013
|
|
|
|
21,855
|
|
|
|
22,218
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,721
|
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
7,078
|
|
|
|
7,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
12,761
|
|
|
|
13,837
|
|
|
|
14,777
|
|
|
|
15,216
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,644
|
|
|
|
3,099
|
|
|
|
2,723
|
|
|
|
1,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
11,117
|
|
|
|
10,738
|
|
|
|
12,054
|
|
|
|
13,644
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
7,782
|
|
|
|
9,061
|
|
|
|
8,429
|
|
|
|
8,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
4,304
|
|
|
|
3,201
|
|
|
|
4,982
|
|
|
|
6,205
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
3,187
|
|
|
|
4,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share- basis and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
120
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
John W. Alexander, our Chief Executive Officer, and Steven M.
Klein, our Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) the
Exchange Act as of December 31, 2010. Based
upon their evaluation, they each found that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file
and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported as and when required and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2010 that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting and we
identified no material weaknesses requiring corrective action
with respect to those controls.
Management
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
as such term is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
in the Exchange Act. The Companys internal control system
is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to the
Companys management and board of directors regarding the
preparation and fair presentation of published financial
statements.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies
and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that,
in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions
and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and the directors of the Company;
and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on our
financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have
inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined
to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Companys management assessed the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, we used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework. Based on our assessment we believe that, as of
December 31, 2010, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
The Companys independent registered public accounting firm
that audited the consolidated financial statements has issued an
audit report on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,
and it is included in Item 8, under Part II of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
This report appears on page 73 of the document.
121
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
The sections of the Companys definitive proxy statement
for the Companys 2011 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders
(the 2011 Proxy Statement) entitled
Proposal I-Election
of Directors, Other Information-Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance, Corporate
Governance and Board Matters -Codes of Conduct and Ethics,
Stockholder Communications, and Board of
Directors, Leadership Structure, Role in Risk Oversight,
Meetings and Standing Committees-Audit Committee are
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The sections of the Companys 2011 Proxy Statement entitled
Corporate Governance and Board
Matters-Director
Compensation, and Executive Compensation are
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The sections of the Companys 2011 Proxy Statement entitled
Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof,
Corporate Governance and Board Matters Equity
Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders and
Proposal I-Election
of Directors are incorporated herein by reference
Set forth below is information as of December 31, 2010,
with respect to compensation plans (other than our employee
stock ownership plan) under which equity securities of the
Company are authorized for issuance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Stock-Based
|
|
|
|
be Issued Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
of Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights(1)
|
|
|
Reflected in First Column)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
2,726,420
|
|
|
$
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
123,038
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,726,420
|
|
|
$
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
123,038
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the weighted average exercise price of 2,072,540
outstanding options at December 31, 2010. |
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND
DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The section of the Companys 2011 Proxy Statement entitled
Corporate Governance and Board Matters-Transactions with
Certain Related Persons is incorporated herein by reference
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
The sections of the Companys 2011 Proxy Statement entitled
Audit-Related Matters-Policy for Approval of Audit and
Permitted Non-audit Services and Auditor Fees and
Services are incorporated herein by reference.
122
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The following documents are filed as part of this
Form 10-K.
(A) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(B) Consolidated Balance Sheets at
December 31, 2010, and 2009
(C) Consolidated Statements of Income Years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008
(D) Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Stockholders Equity Years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008
(E) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Years
ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008
(F) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
None.
(a)(3) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Charter of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Bylaws of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Amendments to Bylaws of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement with Kenneth J. Doherty(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement with Steven M. Klein(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Albert J.
Regen(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Northfield Bank 2011 Management Cash Incentive Compensation
Plan(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Short Term Disability and Long Term Disability for Senior
Management(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Northfield Bank Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Northfield Bank Non Qualified Supplemental Employee Stock
Ownership Plan(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement with John W. Alexander(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement with Michael J. Widmer(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Amendment to Northfield Bank Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Amendment to Northfield Bank Non Qualified Supplemental Employee
Stock Ownership Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Form of Director Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement
under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Form of Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2008
Equity Incentive Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Form of Employee Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement
under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Employee Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement under
the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Form of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2008
Equity Incentive Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. Management Cash Incentive Plan(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Group Term Replacement Plan(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Addendum to Employment Agreement with Steven M. Klein(2)
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Addendum to Employment Agreement with Kenneth J. Doherty(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002*
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (File
No. 333-143643),
originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 11, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated January 3, 2011, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on January 4, 2011 (File Number
001-33732). |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
dated December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 31, 2008 (File Number
001-33732). |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated December 22, 2010, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 27, 2010 (File Number
001-33732). |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2008
(File Number
001-33732). |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
dated December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 16, 2009 (File Number
001-33732). |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Appendix A of Northfield
Bancorp Inc.s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2009
Annual Meeting of Stockholders (File
No. 001-33732)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 23, 2009). |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated March 25, 2009, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 27, 2009 (File Number
001-33732). |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated April 28, 2010, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 29, 2010 (File Number
001-33732). |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Current Report on Form
8-K, dated
June 23, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 25, 2010 (File Number
001-33732). |
124
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ John
W. Alexander
|
John W. Alexander
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Representative)
Date: March 15, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
W. Alexander
John
W. Alexander
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven
M. Klein
Steven
M. Klein
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
R. Bowen
John
R. Bowen
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Annette
Catino
Annette
Catino
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gil
Chapman
Gil
Chapman
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
P. Connors, Jr.
John
P. Connors, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
J. DePierro
John
J. DePierro
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Susan
Lamberti
Susan
Lamberti
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Albert
J. Regen
Albert
J. Regen
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick
E. Scura, Jr.
Patrick
E. Scura, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2011
|
125