e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2011
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-14063
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
38-1886260 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
10560 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Street North, St. Petersburg, Florida 33716
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(727) 577-9749
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of March 30, 2011, there were 218,513,166 shares of the registrants Common Stock outstanding.
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1: |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2011 (Unaudited) |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
902,317 |
|
|
$ |
744,329 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $7,611 at February 28, 2011 and $13,939 at
August 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,051,482 |
|
|
|
1,408,319 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
2,160,275 |
|
|
|
2,094,135 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
600,816 |
|
|
|
349,165 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
38,213 |
|
|
|
35,560 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
19,152 |
|
|
|
22,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
4,772,255 |
|
|
|
4,654,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$1,257,927 at February 28, 2011 and $1,166,807 at August 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,547,394 |
|
|
|
1,451,392 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
49,094 |
|
|
|
28,455 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $116,088 at
February 28, 2011 and $112,687 at August 31, 2010 |
|
|
97,750 |
|
|
|
104,113 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
67,497 |
|
|
|
55,101 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
78,795 |
|
|
|
74,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,612,785 |
|
|
$ |
6,367,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current installments of notes payable and long-term debt |
|
$ |
137,508 |
|
|
$ |
167,566 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,672,382 |
|
|
|
2,741,719 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
699,002 |
|
|
|
672,252 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
33,275 |
|
|
|
19,236 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,814 |
|
|
|
4,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
3,546,981 |
|
|
|
3,605,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and long-term debt, less current installments |
|
|
1,100,547 |
|
|
|
1,018,930 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
62,711 |
|
|
|
63,058 |
|
Income tax liability |
|
|
91,889 |
|
|
|
86,351 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,260 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,804,388 |
|
|
|
4,774,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jabil Circuit, Inc. stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 500,000,000
shares; 223,439,475 and 219,532,908 shares issued and
213,723,960 and 210,496,989 shares outstanding at February
28, 2011 and August 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,595,848 |
|
|
|
1,541,507 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
253,664 |
|
|
|
123,303 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
161,219 |
|
|
|
122,062 |
|
Treasury stock at cost, 9,715,515 shares at February 28,
2011 and 9,035,919 shares at August 31, 2010 |
|
|
(218,768 |
) |
|
|
(209,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Jabil Circuit, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
1,792,186 |
|
|
|
1,578,046 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
16,211 |
|
|
|
14,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,808,397 |
|
|
|
1,592,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
6,612,785 |
|
|
$ |
6,367,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except for per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
3,928,663 |
|
|
$ |
3,004,644 |
|
|
$ |
8,010,844 |
|
|
$ |
6,092,900 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
3,632,263 |
|
|
|
2,781,898 |
|
|
|
7,403,853 |
|
|
|
5,638,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
296,400 |
|
|
|
222,746 |
|
|
|
606,991 |
|
|
|
454,522 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
141,807 |
|
|
|
146,264 |
|
|
|
284,256 |
|
|
|
277,817 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
6,540 |
|
|
|
7,425 |
|
|
|
12,281 |
|
|
|
15,122 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
5,665 |
|
|
|
6,643 |
|
|
|
11,634 |
|
|
|
13,748 |
|
Restructuring and impairment charges |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
4,070 |
|
Settlement of receivables and related charges |
|
|
13,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of subsidiaries |
|
|
23,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,944 |
|
|
|
15,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
104,641 |
|
|
|
61,779 |
|
|
|
260,641 |
|
|
|
128,043 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
(1,589 |
) |
|
|
(1,551 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
25,777 |
|
|
|
20,030 |
|
|
|
47,939 |
|
|
|
40,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax |
|
|
78,756 |
|
|
|
41,268 |
|
|
|
213,644 |
|
|
|
87,285 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
23,038 |
|
|
|
11,446 |
|
|
|
50,515 |
|
|
|
28,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
55,718 |
|
|
|
29,822 |
|
|
|
163,129 |
|
|
|
58,703 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of income tax expense |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
$ |
55,403 |
|
|
$ |
29,830 |
|
|
$ |
162,080 |
|
|
$ |
58,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to the stockholders of Jabil Circuit, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
215,170 |
|
|
|
213,625 |
|
|
|
214,781 |
|
|
|
214,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
221,022 |
|
|
|
214,760 |
|
|
|
219,469 |
|
|
|
215,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
55,718 |
|
|
$ |
29,822 |
|
|
$ |
163,129 |
|
|
$ |
58,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
25,265 |
|
|
|
(33,028 |
) |
|
|
35,996 |
|
|
|
(25,307 |
) |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments, net of tax |
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
(1,926 |
) |
|
|
2,529 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
Amortization of loss on hedge arrangements, net of tax |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
2,025 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
2,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
82,516 |
|
|
|
(3,107 |
) |
|
|
202,286 |
|
|
|
35,767 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
$ |
82,201 |
|
|
$ |
(3,099 |
) |
|
$ |
201,237 |
|
|
$ |
35,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments were $204.4 million at February 28,
2011 and $168.4 million at August 31, 2010. Foreign currency translation adjustments primarily
consist of adjustments to consolidate subsidiaries that use a foreign currency as their functional
currency.
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands, except for share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jabil Circuit, Inc. Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Par |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at August 31, 2010 |
|
|
210,496,989 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
1,541,507 |
|
|
$ |
123,303 |
|
|
$ |
122,062 |
|
|
$ |
(209,046 |
) |
|
$ |
14,726 |
|
|
$ |
1,592,772 |
|
Shares issued upon exercise of
stock options |
|
|
654,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,145 |
|
Shares issued under employee
stock purchase plan |
|
|
506,250 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,649 |
|
Issuance and vesting of
restricted stock awards |
|
|
2,745,143 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock under
employee stock plans |
|
|
(679,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,722 |
) |
Recognition of stock-based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,718 |
|
Tax (shortfall) of options
exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
Declared dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,719 |
) |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,080 |
|
|
|
39,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
202,286 |
|
Foreign currency adjustments
attributable to noncontrolling
interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at February 28, 2011 |
|
|
213,723,960 |
|
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
1,595,848 |
|
|
$ |
253,664 |
|
|
$ |
161,219 |
|
|
$ |
(218,768 |
) |
|
$ |
16,211 |
|
|
$ |
1,808,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
163,129 |
|
|
$ |
58,703 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
151,874 |
|
|
|
142,461 |
|
Recognition of deferred grant proceeds |
|
|
(977 |
) |
|
|
(979 |
) |
Amortization of loss on hedge arrangement |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
1,975 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount |
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
Recognition of stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
39,801 |
|
|
|
40,493 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(6,682 |
) |
|
|
(4,709 |
) |
Restructuring and impairment charges |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
4,070 |
|
Provision for allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
(264 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from options exercised |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
Loss on sale of property |
|
|
1,983 |
|
|
|
3,302 |
|
Settlement of receivables and related charges |
|
|
12,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of subsidiaries |
|
|
23,944 |
|
|
|
12,756 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities, exclusive of net assets acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
178,311 |
|
|
|
43,214 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(104,299 |
) |
|
|
(361,147 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(14,590 |
) |
|
|
(25,152 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(10,723 |
) |
|
|
4,027 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(84,673 |
) |
|
|
166,645 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
12,366 |
|
|
|
17,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
367,605 |
|
|
|
104,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for business and intangible asset acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(207,347 |
) |
|
|
(116,371 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
9,817 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
Cost of receivables acquired, net of cash collections |
|
|
(33,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds on disposal of available for sale investments |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(220,992 |
) |
|
|
(111,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under debt agreements |
|
|
3,149,528 |
|
|
|
1,948,926 |
|
Payments toward debt agreements |
|
|
(3,100,167 |
) |
|
|
(1,988,253 |
) |
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options and issuance of common stock under
employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
14,794 |
|
|
|
5,832 |
|
Treasury stock minimum tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock |
|
|
(9,722 |
) |
|
|
(3,288 |
) |
Dividends paid to stockholders |
|
|
(30,214 |
) |
|
|
(29,921 |
) |
Bond issuance costs |
|
|
(14,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from options exercised |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
9,744 |
|
|
|
(66,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
|
(9,302 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
157,988 |
|
|
|
(82,135 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
744,329 |
|
|
|
876,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
902,317 |
|
|
$ |
794,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) necessary to present fairly the information set forth therein have been included. The
accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction
with the Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Jabil Circuit, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010. Results for the
three month and six month periods ended February 28, 2011 are not necessarily an indication of the
results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending August 31, 2011.
Certain amounts in the prior periods financial statements have been reclassified to conform
to the current periods presentation.
Note 2. Inventories
The components of inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
1,535,767 |
|
|
$ |
1,509,886 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
386,028 |
|
|
|
390,069 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
238,480 |
|
|
|
194,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
2,160,275 |
|
|
$ |
2,094,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 3. Earnings Per Share and Dividends
a. Earnings Per Share
The Company calculates its basic earnings per share by dividing net income attributable to
Jabil Circuit, Inc. by the weighted average number of common shares and participating securities
outstanding during the period. In periods of a net loss, participating securities are not included
in the basic loss per share calculation as such participating securities are not contractually
obligated to fund losses. The Companys diluted earnings per share is calculated in a similar
manner, but includes the effect of dilutive securities. To the extent these securities are
anti-dilutive, they are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share. The following
table sets forth the calculations of basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to the
stockholders of Jabil Circuit, Inc. (in thousands, except earnings per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
$ |
55,403 |
|
|
$ |
29,830 |
|
|
$ |
162,080 |
|
|
$ |
58,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
213,285 |
|
|
|
209,182 |
|
|
|
212,374 |
|
|
|
208,769 |
|
Share-based payment awards classified as participating securities |
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
4,443 |
|
|
|
2,407 |
|
|
|
5,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share |
|
|
215,170 |
|
|
|
213,625 |
|
|
|
214,781 |
|
|
|
214,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive common shares issuable under the employee stock purchase
plan and upon exercise of stock options and stock appreciation
rights |
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Dilutive unvested restricted stock awards |
|
|
4,937 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share |
|
|
221,022 |
|
|
|
214,760 |
|
|
|
219,469 |
|
|
|
215,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to the stockholders of Jabil Circuit, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
For the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011, options to
purchase 4,154,857 and 4,190,297 shares of common stock, respectively, and 5,364,409 and 5,401,785
stock appreciation rights, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per
share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the three months and six months ended
February 28, 2010, options to purchase 5,328,227 and 6,646,807 shares of common stock,
respectively, and 7,997,232 and 7,997,567 stock appreciation rights, respectively, were excluded
from the computation of diluted earnings per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
b. Dividends
The following table sets forth certain information relating to the Companys cash dividends
declared to common stockholders of the Company during the six months ended February 28, 2011 and
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend |
|
Dividend |
|
Dividends |
|
Date of Record for |
|
Dividend Cash |
|
|
Declaration Date |
|
per Share |
|
Declared |
|
Dividend Payment |
|
Payment Date |
|
|
(in thousands, except for per share data) |
Fiscal year 2011: |
|
October 25, 2010 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,563 |
|
|
November 15, 2010 |
|
December 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 25, 2011 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,634 |
|
|
February 15, 2011 |
|
March 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2010: |
|
October 22, 2009 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,186 |
(1) |
|
November 16, 2009 |
|
December 1, 2009 |
|
|
January 22, 2010 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,238 |
|
|
February 16, 2010 |
|
March 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Of the $15.2 million in total dividends declared during the first quarter of fiscal
year 2010, $14.4 million was paid out of additional paid-in capital (which represents the
amount of dividends declared in excess of the Companys retained earnings balance as of the
date that the dividend was declared). |
Note 4. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense, reduced for estimated forfeitures, on
a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the
vesting period for outstanding stock awards. The Company recorded $20.3 million and $39.8 million
of stock-based compensation expense gross of tax effects, which is included in selling, general and
administrative expenses within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three
months and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively. The Company recorded tax effects
related to the stock-based compensation expense of $0.3 million and $0.8 million, which is included
in income tax expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three
months and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively. Included in the compensation expense
recognized by the Company are $1.3 million and $2.0 million related to the Companys employee stock
purchase plan (ESPP) during the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011,
respectively. The Company recorded $26.5 million and $40.5 million of gross stock-based
compensation expense, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses within the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and six months ended February
28, 2010, respectively. The Company recorded tax effects related to the stock-based compensation
expense of $0.3 million and $0.6 million, which is included in income tax expense within the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and six months ended February
28, 2010, respectively. Included in the compensation expense recognized by the Company are $1.3
million and $2.2 million related to the Companys ESPP during the three months and six months ended
February 28, 2010, respectively. The Company capitalizes stock-based compensation costs related to
awards granted to employees whose compensation costs are directly attributable to the cost of
inventory. At February 28, 2011 and August 31, 2010, $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively,
of stock-based compensation costs were classified as inventories on the Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
Cash received from exercises under all share-based payment arrangements,
including the Companys ESPP, for the six months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010 was $14.8 million
and $5.8 million, respectively. The proceeds for the six months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010
were offset by $9.7 million and $3.3 million, respectively, of restricted shares withheld by the
Company to satisfy the minimum amount of its income tax withholding requirements. The market value
of the restricted shares withheld was determined on the date that the restricted shares vested and
resulted in the withholding of 679,351 shares and 218,782 shares of the Companys common stock
during the six months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The shares have been
classified as treasury
stock on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company currently expects to satisfy
share-based awards with registered shares available to be issued.
9
A new stock award and incentive plan (the 2011 Plan) was adopted by the Board of Directors
in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 and approved by the stockholders in the second quarter of
fiscal year 2011. The 2011 Plan provides for the granting of restricted stock awards, restricted
stock unit awards and other stock-based awards. The maximum aggregate number of shares that may be
subject to awards under the 2011 Plan is 8,850,000. If any portion of an outstanding award that was
granted under the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2002 Plan), which was terminated immediately
upon the effectiveness of the 2011 Plan, for any reason expires or is terminated or canceled or
forfeited on or after the date of termination of the 2002 Plan, the shares allocable to the
expired, terminated, canceled, or forfeited portion of such 2002 Plan award shall be available for
issuance under the 2011 Plan.
The current ESPP was adopted by the Companys Board of Directors in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2002 and approved by the shareholders in the second quarter of fiscal year 2002.
Initially there were 2,000,000 shares reserved under the current ESPP. An additional 2,000,000
shares and 3,000,000 shares were authorized for issuance under the current ESPP and approved by
stockholders in the second quarter of fiscal years 2006 and 2009, respectively. A new ESPP was
adopted by the Companys Board of Directors in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 and approved
by the shareholders in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 with 6,000,000 shares authorized for
issuance. The new ESPP will begin issuing shares after the purchase period ending June 30, 2011.
The Company also adopted a tax advantaged sub-plan under the ESPP for its Indian employees. Shares
are issued under the Indian sub-plan from the authorized shares under the ESPP.
a. Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Right Plans
The Company applies a lattice valuation model for Options granted, excluding those granted
under the ESPP. The lattice valuation model is a more flexible analysis to value employee Options,
as compared to a Black-Scholes model, because of its ability to incorporate inputs that change over
time, such as volatility and interest rates, and to allow for actual exercise behavior of Option
holders.
There were no options granted during the six months ended February 28, 2011. The
weighted-average grant-date fair value per share of Options granted during the six months ended
February 28, 2010 was $6.36. The total intrinsic value of Options exercised during the six months
ended February 28, 2011 and 2010 was $3.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively. As of February
28, 2011, there was $3.0 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested Options
that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.0 year. The total fair value
of Options vested during the six months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010 was $4.9 million and $10.2
million, respectively.
Following are the grant date weighted-average and range assumptions, where applicable, used
for each respective period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
* |
|
|
0.1% to 3.4 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
0.1% to 3.4 |
% |
Weighted-average expected volatility |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
60.2 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
60.2 |
% |
Weighted-average expected life |
|
|
* |
|
|
5.6 years |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
5.6 years |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The Company did not grant Options during the three months and six months ended February 28,
2011. |
The following table summarizes Option activity from August 31, 2010 through February 28, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Available |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
for Grant |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life (years) |
|
Balance at August 31, 2010 |
|
|
10,480,001 |
|
|
|
13,154,272 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
24.10 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options authorized |
|
|
8,850,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expired |
|
|
(810,611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options canceled |
|
|
1,072,898 |
|
|
|
(1,072,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards(1) |
|
|
(4,753,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(663,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at February 28, 2011 |
|
|
14,838,734 |
|
|
|
11,417,734 |
|
|
$ |
14,585 |
|
|
$ |
24.10 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at February 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,979,767 |
|
|
$ |
14,070 |
|
|
$ |
24.26 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the maximum number of shares that can be issued based on the
achievement of certain performance criteria. |
b. Restricted Stock Awards
Certain key employees have been granted time-based, performance-based, and market-based
restricted stock awards. The time-based restricted awards granted generally vest on a graded
vesting schedule over three years. The performance-based restricted awards generally vest on a
cliff vesting schedule over three years and provide a range of vesting possibilities from 0% to
200%, depending on the level of achievement of the specified performance condition. The
market-based restricted awards have a vesting condition that is tied to the Standard and Poors 500
Composite Index.
The stock-based compensation expense for these restricted stock awards (including restricted
stock and restricted stock units) is measured at fair value on the date of grant based on the
number of shares expected to vest and the quoted market price of the Companys common stock. For
restricted stock awards with performance conditions, stock-based compensation expense is originally
based on the number of shares that would vest if the Company achieved 100% of the performance goal,
which was the probable outcome at the grant date. Throughout the requisite service period,
management monitors the probability of achievement of the performance condition. If it becomes
probable, based on the Companys performance, that more or less than the current estimate of the
awarded shares will vest, an adjustment to stock-based compensation expense will be recognized as a
change in accounting estimate. For restricted stock awards with market conditions, the market
conditions are considered in the grant date fair value of the award using a lattice model, which
utilizes multiple input variables to determine the probability of the Company achieving the
specified market conditions. Stock-based compensation expense related to an award with a market
condition will be recognized over the requisite service period regardless of whether the market
condition is satisfied, provided that the requisite service period has been completed.
At February 28, 2011, there was $99.8 million of total unrecognized stock-based compensation
expense related to restricted stock awards granted under the 2002 Plan and 2011 Plan. This expense
is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity from August 31, 2010 through February
28, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
Non-vested balance at August 31, 2010 |
|
|
12,189,271 |
|
|
|
$13.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares granted(1) |
|
|
6,102,534 |
|
|
|
$14.23 |
|
Shares vested |
|
|
(2,649,143 |
) |
|
|
$17.03 |
|
Shares forfeited |
|
|
(1,348,980 |
) |
|
|
$13.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested balance at February 28, 2011 |
|
|
14,293,682 |
|
|
|
$12.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the maximum number of shares that can vest based on the
achievement of certain performance criteria. |
c. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Employees are eligible to participate in the ESPP after 90 days of employment with the
Company. The ESPP permits eligible employees to purchase common stock through payroll deductions,
which may not exceed 10% of an employees compensation, as
defined in the ESPP, at a price equal to 85% of the fair value of the common stock at the
beginning or end of the offering period, whichever is lower. The ESPP is intended to qualify under
Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.
11
The maximum number of shares that a participant may purchase in an
offering period is determined in June and December. As such, there were 506,250 and 740,720 shares
purchased under the ESPP during the six months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At
February 28, 2011, a total of 6,297,969 shares had been issued under the ESPP.
The fair value of shares issued under the ESPP was estimated on the commencement date of each
offering period using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following weighted-average
assumptions were used in the model for each respective period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Weighted-average expected volatility |
|
|
49.7 |
% |
|
|
49.0 |
% |
|
|
49.7 |
% |
|
|
49.0 |
% |
Expected life |
|
.5 years |
|
.5 years |
|
.5 years |
|
.5 years |
Note 5. Concentration of Risk and Segment Data
a. Concentration of Risk
The Company operates in 24 countries worldwide. Sales to unaffiliated customers are based on
the Companys location that provides the comprehensive electronics design, production and product
management services. The following table sets forth external net revenue, net of intercompany
eliminations, and long-lived asset information where individual countries represent a material
portion of the total (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
External net revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
$ |
943,808 |
|
|
$ |
716,051 |
|
|
$ |
1,958,835 |
|
|
$ |
1,559,181 |
|
China |
|
|
791,137 |
|
|
|
520,147 |
|
|
|
1,595,142 |
|
|
|
1,137,750 |
|
United States |
|
|
591,461 |
|
|
|
509,953 |
|
|
|
1,144,807 |
|
|
|
938,834 |
|
Hungary |
|
|
416,137 |
|
|
|
282,061 |
|
|
|
839,016 |
|
|
|
522,103 |
|
Malaysia |
|
|
280,228 |
|
|
|
280,272 |
|
|
|
556,547 |
|
|
|
499,842 |
|
Brazil |
|
|
171,052 |
|
|
|
137,958 |
|
|
|
371,331 |
|
|
|
272,690 |
|
Other |
|
|
734,840 |
|
|
|
558,202 |
|
|
|
1,545,166 |
|
|
|
1,162,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,928,663 |
|
|
$ |
3,004,644 |
|
|
$ |
8,010,844 |
|
|
$ |
6,092,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Long-lived assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China |
|
$ |
513,366 |
|
|
$ |
483,181 |
|
United States |
|
|
257,839 |
|
|
|
255,108 |
|
Mexico |
|
|
203,294 |
|
|
|
212,409 |
|
Poland |
|
|
124,065 |
|
|
|
98,395 |
|
Taiwan |
|
|
116,465 |
|
|
|
110,237 |
|
Malaysia |
|
|
114,907 |
|
|
|
102,700 |
|
Other |
|
|
364,302 |
|
|
|
321,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,694,238 |
|
|
$ |
1,583,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign source net revenue represented 84.9% and 85.7% of net revenue for the three
months and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively, compared to 83.0% and 84.6% for the
three months and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively.
Sales of the Companys products are concentrated among specific customers. For the six months
ended February 28, 2011, the Companys five largest customers accounted for approximately 47% of
its net revenue and 49 customers accounted for approximately
90% of its net revenue. Sales to the above customers were reported in the Diversified
Manufacturing Services (DMS), Enterprise & Infrastructure (E&I) and High Velocity Systems
(HVS) segments.
12
Production levels for the HVS segment are subject to seasonal influences. The Company may
realize greater net revenue during its first fiscal quarter due to higher demand for consumer
related products manufactured in the HVS segment during the holiday selling season. Therefore,
quarterly results should not be relied upon as necessarily being indicative of results for the
entire fiscal year.
b. Segment Data
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise that engage in business
activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses; for which separate financial
information is available; and whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating
decision maker to assess the performance of the individual segment and make decisions about
resources to be allocated to the segment.
The Company derives its revenue from providing comprehensive electronics design, production
and product management services. Management, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief
Financial Officer and the Chief Operating Officer evaluates performance and allocates resources on
a segment basis. Prior to the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company managed its business
based on three segments, Electronic Manufacturing Services, Consumer and Aftermarket Services. On
September 1, 2010, the Company reorganized its reporting structure to align with the chief
operating decision makers management of resource allocation and performance assessment.
Accordingly, the Companys operating segments now consist of three segments DMS, E&I and HVS.
All prior period disclosures below have been restated to reflect this change.
Net revenue for the operating segments is attributed to the segment in which the product is
manufactured or service is performed. An operating segments performance is evaluated based on its
pre-tax operating contribution, or segment income. Segment income is defined as net revenue less
cost of revenue, segment selling, general and administrative expenses, segment research and
development expenses and an allocation of corporate manufacturing expenses and selling, general and
administrative expenses, and does not include stock-based compensation expense, amortization of
intangibles, restructuring and impairment charges, settlement of receivables and related charges,
loss on disposal of subsidiaries, other expense, interest income, interest expense, income tax
expense or adjustment for net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Total segment assets
are defined as trade accounts receivable, inventories, net customer-related machinery and
equipment, intangible assets net of accumulated amortization and goodwill. All other non-segment
assets are reviewed on a global basis by management.
The following table sets forth operating segment information (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DMS |
|
$ |
1,401,361 |
|
|
$ |
951,242 |
|
|
$ |
2,796,005 |
|
|
$ |
1,904,605 |
|
E&I |
|
|
1,236,805 |
|
|
|
1,038,261 |
|
|
|
2,400,917 |
|
|
|
1,941,246 |
|
HVS |
|
|
1,290,497 |
|
|
|
1,015,141 |
|
|
|
2,813,922 |
|
|
|
2,247,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,928,663 |
|
|
$ |
3,004,644 |
|
|
$ |
8,010,844 |
|
|
$ |
6,092,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income and reconciliation of income before income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
DMS |
|
$ |
85,908 |
|
|
$ |
40,888 |
|
|
$ |
181,184 |
|
|
$ |
99,382 |
|
E&I |
|
|
57,271 |
|
|
|
46,820 |
|
|
|
109,358 |
|
|
|
76,806 |
|
HVS |
|
|
25,175 |
|
|
|
7,861 |
|
|
|
59,713 |
|
|
|
25,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment income |
|
|
168,354 |
|
|
|
95,569 |
|
|
|
350,255 |
|
|
|
202,076 |
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
20,301 |
|
|
|
26,512 |
|
|
|
39,801 |
|
|
|
40,493 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
5,665 |
|
|
|
6,643 |
|
|
|
11,634 |
|
|
|
13,748 |
|
Restructuring and impairment charges |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
4,070 |
|
Settlement of receivables and related charges |
|
|
13,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of subsidiaries |
|
|
23,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,944 |
|
|
|
15,722 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
(1,589 |
) |
|
|
(1,551 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
25,777 |
|
|
|
20,030 |
|
|
|
47,939 |
|
|
|
40,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax |
|
$ |
78,756 |
|
|
$ |
41,268 |
|
|
$ |
213,644 |
|
|
$ |
87,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DMS |
|
$ |
2,176,440 |
|
|
$ |
2,194,998 |
|
E&I |
|
|
1,252,744 |
|
|
|
1,033,910 |
|
HVS |
|
|
1,108,403 |
|
|
|
1,469,476 |
|
Other non-allocated assets |
|
|
2,075,198 |
|
|
|
1,669,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,612,785 |
|
|
$ |
6,367,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6. Commitments and Contingencies
a. Legal Proceedings
The Company is party to certain lawsuits in the ordinary course of business. The Company does
not believe that these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
b. Warranty Provision
The Company maintains a provision for limited warranty repair of shipped products, which is
established under the terms of specific manufacturing contract agreements. The warranty liability
is included in accrued expenses on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The warranty period
varies by product and customer industry sector. The provision represents managements estimate of
probable liabilities, calculated as a function of sales volume and historical repair experience,
for each product under warranty. The estimate is re-evaluated periodically for accuracy. A
rollforward of the warranty liability for the six months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Balance at August 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
10,828 |
|
Accruals for warranties |
|
|
3,960 |
|
Warranty liabilities acquired |
|
|
3,986 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at February 28, 2011 |
|
$ |
18,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Balance at August 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
14,280 |
|
Accruals for warranties |
|
|
4,237 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
(4,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at February 28, 2010 |
|
$ |
14,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
14
Note 7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company performs a goodwill impairment analysis using the two-step method on an annual
basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. The recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level, which the
Company has determined to be consistent with its operating segments, by comparing the reporting
units carrying amount, including goodwill, to the fair value of the reporting unit. If the
carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered impaired and a
second step is performed to measure the amount of loss, if any.
The Company completed its annual impairment test for goodwill during the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2010 and determined the fair values of the reporting units were substantially in excess
of the carrying values and that no impairment existed as of the date of the impairment test. For
each annual impairment test the Company consistently determines the fair value of its reporting
units based on an average weighting of both projected discounted future results and the use of
comparative market multiples. On September 1, 2010, the Company reorganized its business into the
DMS, E&I and HVS segments. In doing so, the Company reassigned its goodwill to the new reporting
units (which are deemed to be consistent with the new segments) and was required to perform an
interim goodwill impairment test based on these new reporting units. Based on this interim goodwill
impairment test, the Company determined that the fair values of its new reporting units were
substantially in excess of the carrying values and that no impairment existed as of the date of the
interim impairment test.
The following table presents the changes in goodwill allocated to the Companys reportable
segments during the six months ended February 28, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
& |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segment |
|
Balance |
|
|
Impairment Balance |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Net Balance |
|
DMS |
|
$ |
583,423 |
|
|
$ |
(558,768 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
377 |
|
|
$ |
583,800 |
|
|
$ |
(558,768 |
) |
|
$ |
25,032 |
|
E&I |
|
|
335,584 |
|
|
|
(331,784 |
) |
|
|
20,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355,846 |
|
|
|
(331,784 |
) |
|
|
24,062 |
|
HVS |
|
|
132,269 |
|
|
|
(132,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,269 |
|
|
|
(132,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,051,276 |
|
|
$ |
(1,022,821 |
) |
|
$ |
20,262 |
|
|
$ |
377 |
|
|
$ |
1,071,915 |
|
|
$ |
(1,022,821 |
) |
|
$ |
49,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets consist primarily of contractual agreements and customer relationships,
which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 10 years, intellectual
property which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of up to five years and a
trade name which has an indefinite life. The Company completed its annual impairment test for its
indefinite-lived intangible asset during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010 and determined that
no impairment existed as of the date of the impairment test. Significant judgments inherent in this
analysis included assumptions regarding appropriate revenue growth rates, discount rates and
royalty rates. No significant residual value is estimated for the amortizable intangible assets.
The value of the Companys intangible assets purchased through business acquisitions is principally
determined based on valuations of the net assets acquired. The following tables present the
Companys total purchased intangible assets at February 28, 2011 and August 31, 2010 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
carrying |
|
February 28, 2011 |
|
amount |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
amount |
|
Contractual agreements and customer relationships |
|
$ |
84,746 |
|
|
$ |
(48,660 |
) |
|
$ |
36,086 |
|
Intellectual property |
|
|
77,535 |
|
|
|
(67,428 |
) |
|
|
10,107 |
|
Trade name |
|
|
51,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
213,838 |
|
|
$ |
(116,088 |
) |
|
$ |
97,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
carrying |
|
August 31, 2010 |
|
amount |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
amount |
|
Contractual agreements and customer relationships |
|
$ |
83,746 |
|
|
$ |
(43,698 |
) |
|
$ |
40,048 |
|
Intellectual property |
|
|
85,166 |
|
|
|
(68,989 |
) |
|
|
16,177 |
|
Trade name |
|
|
47,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
216,800 |
|
|
$ |
(112,687 |
) |
|
$ |
104,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
The weighted-average amortization period for aggregate net intangible assets at February
28, 2011 is 7.6 years, which includes a weighted-average amortization period of 9.5 years for net
contractual agreements and customer relationships and a weighted-average amortization period of 5.0
years for net intellectual property.
The estimated future amortization expense is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ending August 31, |
|
Amount |
|
2011 (remaining six months) |
|
$ |
10,222 |
|
2012 |
|
|
13,228 |
|
2013 |
|
|
8,837 |
|
2014 |
|
|
7,653 |
|
2015 |
|
|
4,748 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
46,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Trade Accounts Receivable Securitization and Sale Programs
The Company regularly sells designated pools of trade accounts receivable under two asset-backed
securitization programs, two trade accounts receivable sale programs and a factoring program.
a. Asset-Backed Securitization Program
In connection with the asset-backed securitization program, the Company regularly sells a
designated pool of trade accounts receivable to a wholly-owned subsidiary, which in turn sells 100%
of the eligible receivables to conduits, administered by unaffiliated financial institutions. This
wholly-owned subsidiary is a separate bankruptcy-remote entity and its assets would be available
first to satisfy the creditor claims of the conduits. As the receivables sold are collected, the
wholly-owned subsidiary is able to sell additional receivables up to the maximum permitted amount
under the program. Net cash proceeds of $300.0 million are available at any one time under the
securitization program.
Prior to September 1, 2010, the transactions in this program were accounted for as sales under
applicable accounting guidance. Effective September 1, 2010, the Company adopted new accounting
guidance that resulted in more stringent conditions for reporting the transfer of a financial asset
as a sale. As a result of the adoption of this new guidance, the accounts receivable transferred
under this program no longer qualified for sale treatment and as such were accounted for as secured
borrowings. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, this program was amended to again account
for the transfers of the applicable accounts receivable as sales. Under the amended program any
portion of the purchase price for the receivables which is not paid in cash upon the sale taking
place is recorded as a deferred purchase price receivable, which is paid by the conduits from
available cash as payments on the receivables are collected. The securitization program requires
compliance with several financial covenants including an interest coverage ratio and debt to EBITDA
ratio, as defined in the securitization agreements. The securitization agreement, as amended on
November 5, 2010, expires on November 4, 2011.
Net receivables sold under this program are excluded from trade accounts receivable on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reflected as cash provided by operating activities on
the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The wholly-owned subsidiary is assessed a fee
on the unused portion of the program of 0.50% per annum based on the average daily unused aggregate
receivables sold during the period and a usage fee on the utilized portion of the program is equal
to 0.95% per annum (inclusive of the unused fee) on the average daily outstanding aggregate
receivables sold during the immediately preceding calendar month. The securitization conduits and
the investors in the conduits have no recourse to the Companys assets for failure of debtors to
pay when due.
The Company continues servicing the receivables sold and in exchange receives a servicing fee.
Servicing fees recognized during the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010
were not material and are included in other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The Company does not record a servicing asset or liability as the Company estimates
the fee it receives in return for its obligation to service these receivables is at fair value.
The Company has sold $1.5 billion and $2.9 billion of eligible trade accounts receivable
during the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively. In exchange, the
Company has received cash proceeds of $1.2 billion and $2.7 billion during the three months and six
months ended February 28, 2011, respectively, and net deferred purchase price receivables. At
February 28,
16
2011, the deferred purchase price was approximately $218.4 million, which was recorded
initially at fair value as prepaid expenses
and other current assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The deferred purchase
price receivable was valued using unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs), primarily discounted cash
flows, and due to its credit quality and short-term maturity the fair value approximated book
value.
The Company had sold $1.3 billion and $2.5 billion of eligible trade accounts receivable
during the three months and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively. In exchange, the
Company had received cash proceeds of $1.1 billion and $2.3 billion during the three months and six
months ended February 28, 2010, respectively, and retained an interest in the receivables of
approximately $203.3 million at February 28, 2010. The Company recognized pretax losses on the
sales of receivables of approximately $0.9 million and $1.3 million during the three months and six
months ended February 28, 2011 compared to $1.0 million and $2.0 million during the three months
and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively, which are recorded to other expense within
the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prior to execution of the previously discussed
amendment, the Company recognized interest expense of approximately $0.5 million during the first
quarter of fiscal year 2011 associated with the secured borrowings.
b. Foreign Asset-Backed Securitization Program
In connection with the foreign asset-backed securitization program, certain of the Companys
foreign subsidiaries sell, on an ongoing basis, an undivided interest in designated pools of trade
accounts receivable to a special purpose entity, which in turn borrows up to $100.0 million from a
third party bank and grants a security interest in the accounts receivable as collateral for the
borrowings. The securitization program is accounted for as a borrowing. The Company has the power
to direct the activities of the special purpose entity and the obligation to absorb the majority of
the expected losses or the right to receive benefits from the transfer of trade accounts receivable
into the special purpose entity and, as such, is deemed the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, the
Company consolidates the special purpose entity. The loan balance is calculated based on the terms
of the securitization program agreements. The foreign asset-backed securitization program requires
compliance with several covenants including a limitation on certain corporate actions such as
mergers, consolidations and sale of substantially all assets. The Company pays interest at
designated commercial paper rates plus a spread. The securitization program expires on May 20,
2011.
The Company continues servicing the receivables in the program and in exchange receives a
servicing fee. Servicing fees recognized during the three months and six months ended February 28,
2011 and 2010 were not material and are included in interest expense within the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company does not record a servicing asset or liability
on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as the Company estimates the fee it receives in return
for its obligation to service these receivables is at fair value.
The Company had $58.0 million and $111.2 million of debt outstanding under the program at
February 28, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In addition, the Company incurred interest expense of
$0.4 million and $0.6 million recorded within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
during the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively, compared to $0.7
million and $1.4 million for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively.
c. Trade Accounts Receivable Factoring Agreement
In connection with a factoring agreement, the Company transfers ownership of eligible trade
accounts receivable of a foreign subsidiary without recourse to a third party purchaser in exchange
for cash. The factoring of trade accounts receivable under this agreement is accounted for as a
sale. Proceeds on the transfer reflect the face value of the account less a discount. The discount
is recorded as a loss to other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
in the period of the sale. In September 2010, the factoring agreement was extended through March
31, 2011, at which time it is expected to automatically renew for an additional six-month period.
The receivables sold pursuant to this factoring agreement are excluded from trade accounts
receivable on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reflected as cash provided by
operating activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company continues
to service, administer and collect the receivables sold under this program. Servicing fees
recognized during the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010 were not
material. The third party purchaser has no recourse to the Companys assets for failure of debtors
to pay when due.
The Company had sold $12.8 million and $18.1 million of trade accounts receivable at February
28, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and in exchange, received cash proceeds of $12.8 million and $18.1
million at February 28, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The resulting losses on the sales of trade
accounts receivables sold under this factoring agreement were recorded to other expense within the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
d. Trade Accounts Receivable Sale Programs
Under two separate uncommitted accounts receivable sale programs with banks, the Company and
certain of its subsidiaries can elect to sell and the banks can elect to purchase at a discount, on
an ongoing basis, up to a maximum of $200.0 million and $150.0 million of specific trade accounts
receivable at any one time. The programs are accounted for as sales. Net receivables sold under the
17
programs are excluded from trade accounts receivable on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
and are reflected as cash
provided by operating activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The
$200.0 million and $150.0 million sale programs expire on May 25, 2011 and August 24, 2011,
respectively.
The Company continues servicing the receivables in the program. Servicing fees recognized
during the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011 were not material and are included
in other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company does not
record a servicing asset or liability on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as the Company
estimates the fee it receives in return for its obligation to service these receivables is at fair
value.
For the three and six months ended February 28, 2011, the Company had sold $649.0 million and
$1.1 billion of trade accounts receivable under these programs, respectively. In exchange, the
Company received cash proceeds of $648.6 million and $1.1 billion, respectively. The resulting loss
on the sale of trade accounts receivable was $0.4 million and $0.7 million for the three months and
six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively, which was recorded to other expense within the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Note 9. Retirement Benefits
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans in several countries in which it operates.
The pension obligations relate primarily to the following: (a) a funded retirement plan in the
United Kingdom, which provides benefits based on average employee earnings over a three-year
service period preceding retirement and (b) primarily unfunded retirement plans mainly in Austria,
France, Germany, Japan, Poland, Taiwan and The Netherlands and which provide benefits based upon
years of service and compensation at retirement.
There are no domestic pension or postretirement benefit plans maintained by the Company.
The components of net periodic benefit cost (gain) for the Companys pension plans are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
$ |
760 |
|
|
$ |
788 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
2,985 |
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets |
|
|
(1,100 |
) |
|
|
(1,093 |
) |
|
|
(2,196 |
) |
|
|
(2,212 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
Recognized actuarial loss |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
Curtailment gain |
|
|
(1,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost (gain) |
|
$ |
(681 |
) |
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
501 |
|
|
$ |
2,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended February 28, 2011, the Company has made contributions
of approximately $1.8 million to its defined benefit pension plans. The Company presently
anticipates total fiscal year 2011 contributions to approximate $3.6 million to $4.2 million.
Note 10. Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt
Notes payable and long-term debt outstanding at February 28, 2011 and August 31, 2010 are
summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
7.750% Senior Notes due 2016 |
|
$ |
302,632 |
|
|
$ |
301,782 |
|
8.250% Senior Notes due 2018 |
|
|
397,328 |
|
|
|
397,140 |
|
5.625% Senior Notes due 2020 (a) |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit facilities |
|
|
77,150 |
|
|
|
73,750 |
|
Borrowings under loans (b) |
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
342,380 |
|
Securitization program obligations |
|
|
57,953 |
|
|
|
71,436 |
|
Miscellaneous borrowings |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Fair value adjustment (c) |
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
1,238,055 |
|
|
$ |
1,186,496 |
|
Less current installments of notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
137,508 |
|
|
|
167,566 |
|
Notes payable and long-term debt, less current installments |
|
$ |
1,100,547 |
|
|
$ |
1,018,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
The $400.0 million of 5.625% senior unsecured notes (the 5.625% Senior Notes), $312.0
million of 7.750% senior unsecured notes (the 7.750% Senior Notes) and $400.0 million of 8.250%
senior unsecured notes (the 8.250% Senior Notes) outstanding are carried at the principal amount
of each note, less any unamortized discount. The estimated fair value of these senior notes was
approximately $393.0 million, $353.3 million and $455.8 million, respectively, at February 28,
2011. The fair value estimates are based upon observable market data (Level 2 criteria).
a. 5.625% Senior Notes Offering
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company issued the ten-year publicly
registered 5.625% Senior Notes at par. The net proceeds from the offering of $400.0 million were
used to fully repay the term portion of its credit facility dated as of July 19, 2007 and partially
repay amounts outstanding under the Companys foreign asset-backed securitization program. The
5.625% Senior Notes mature on December 15, 2020. Interest on the 5.625% Senior Notes is payable
semiannually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on June 15, 2011. The 5.625% Senior
Notes are the Companys senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all other existing and
future senior unsecured debt obligations. The Company is subject to covenants such as limitations
on its and/or its subsidiaries ability to: consolidate or merge with, or convey, transfer or lease
all or substantially all of the Companys assets to, another person; create certain liens; enter
into sale and leaseback transactions; create, incur, issue, assume or guarantee any funded debt
(which only applies to the Companys restricted subsidiaries); and guarantee any of the Companys
indebtedness (which only applies to the Companys subsidiaries). The Company is also subject to a
covenant requiring its repurchase of the 5.625% Senior Notes upon a change of control repurchase
event.
b. Amended and Restated Credit Facility
On December 7, 2010, the Company amended and restated its five-year $800.0 million revolving
credit facility (the Amended and Restated Credit Facility). The Amended and Restated Credit
Facility provides for a revolving credit in the amount of $1.0 billion, subject to potential
increases up to $1.3 billion, and expires on December 7, 2015. Interest and fees on the Amended
and Restated Credit Facility advances are based on the Companys non-credit enhanced long-term
senior unsecured debt rating as determined by S&P and Moodys. Interest is charged at a rate equal
to either 0.40% to 1.50% above the base rate or 1.40% to 2.50% above the Eurocurrency rate, where
the base rate represents the greatest of Citibank, N.A.s prime rate, 0.50% above the federal funds
rate or 1.0% above one-month LIBOR, and the Eurocurrency rate represents the adjusted London
Interbank Offered Rate for the applicable interest period, each as more fully described in the
Agreement. Fees include a facility fee based on the revolving credit commitments of the lenders and
a letter of credit fee based on the amount of outstanding letters of credit. The Company, along
with its subsidiaries, are subject to the following financial covenants: (1) a maximum ratio of (a)
Debt (as defined in the credit agreement) to (b) Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit
agreement) and (2) a minimum ratio of (a) Consolidated EBITDA to (b) interest payable on, and
amortization of debt discount in respect of, debt and loss on sales of trade accounts receivables
pursuant to our securitization program. In addition, the Company is subject to other covenants,
such as: limitation upon liens; limitation upon mergers, etc.; limitation upon accounting changes;
limitation upon subsidiary debt; limitation upon sales, etc. of assets; limitation upon changes in
nature of business; payment restrictions affecting subsidiaries; compliance with laws, etc.;
payment of taxes, etc.; maintenance of insurance; preservation of corporate existence, etc.;
visitation rights; keeping of books; maintenance of properties, etc.; transactions with affiliates;
and reporting requirements.
c. Fair Value Adjustment
This amount represents the fair value hedge accounting adjustment related to the 7.750% Senior
Notes. For further discussion of the Companys fair value hedges, see Note 11 Derivative
Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 11. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company is directly and indirectly affected by changes in certain market conditions.
These changes in market conditions may adversely impact the Companys financial performance and are
referred to as market risks. The Company, where deemed appropriate, uses derivatives as a risk
management tool to mitigate the potential impact of certain market risks. The primary market risks
managed by the Company through the use of derivatives instruments are foreign currency fluctuation
risk and interest rate risk.
19
All derivative instruments are recorded gross on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets at their respective fair values. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a
derivative instrument depends on the intended use and designation of the derivative instrument. For
derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on
the derivative and the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk
are recognized in current earnings. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a
cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is
initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI), net of tax,
and is subsequently reclassified into the line item within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations in which the hedged items are recorded in the same period in which the hedged item
affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss is recognized immediately in current
earnings. For derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments, gains and
losses from changes in fair values are recognized currently in earnings.
For derivatives accounted for as hedging instruments, the Company formally designates and
documents, at inception, the financial instruments as a hedge of a specific underlying exposure,
the risk management objective and the strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. In addition,
the Company formally assesses, both at inception and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the
financial instruments used in hedging transactions are effective at offsetting changes in the cash
flows on the related underlying exposures.
a. Foreign Currency Risk Management
Forward contracts are put in place to manage the foreign currency risk associated with various
commitments arising from trade accounts receivable, trade accounts payable and fixed purchase
obligations. A hedging relationship existed that related to certain anticipated foreign currency
denominated revenues and expenses, with an aggregate notional amount outstanding of $137.0 million
and $123.2 million at February 28, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The related forward foreign
exchange contracts have been designated as hedging instruments and are accounted for as cash flow
hedges. The forward foreign exchange contract transactions will effectively lock in the value of
anticipated foreign currency denominated revenues and expenses against foreign currency
fluctuations. The anticipated foreign currency denominated revenues and expenses being hedged are
expected to occur between March 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011.
In addition to derivatives that are designated and qualify for hedge accounting, the Company
also enters into forward contracts to economically hedge transactional exposure associated with
commitments arising from trade accounts receivable, trade accounts payable, fixed purchase
obligations and intercompany transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional
currency of the respective operating entity. The aggregate notional amount of these outstanding
contracts at February 28, 2011 and 2010 was $654.3 million and $431.5 million, respectively.
The following table presents the Companys assets and liabilities related to forward foreign
exchange contracts measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of February 28, 2011, aggregated
by the level in the fair-value hierarchy within which those measurements fall (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,090 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,938 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,152 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys forward foreign exchange contracts are measured on a recurring basis
at fair value, based on foreign currency spot rates and forward rates quoted by banks or foreign
currency dealers.
The following table presents the fair value of the Companys derivative instruments located on
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets utilized for foreign currency risk management purposes at
February 28, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
|
|
At February 28, 2011 |
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
Location |
|
Value |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$1,517 |
|
Accrued expense |
|
$549 |
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
|
|
At February 28, 2011 |
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
Location |
|
Value |
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$3,573 |
|
Accrued expense |
|
$3,389 |
The following table presents the fair value of the Companys derivative instruments located on
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets utilized for foreign currency risk management purposes at
August 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
|
|
At August 31, 2010 |
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
Location |
|
Value |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ 669 |
|
Accrued expense |
|
$1,046 |
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$4,814 |
|
Accrued expense |
|
$3,268 |
The following table presents the impact that changes in fair value of derivatives utilized for
foreign currency risk management purposes and designated as hedging instruments had on AOCI and
earnings during the six months ended February 28, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
Derivatives in Cash |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain (Loss) |
|
(Loss) |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
Income on Derivative |
Flow Hedging |
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Reclassified from |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
Relationship for the |
|
in OCI on |
|
AOCI |
|
AOCI |
|
and Amount Excluded |
|
and Amount Excluded |
Six Months Ended |
|
Derivative |
|
into Income |
|
into Income |
|
from Effectiveness |
|
from Effectiveness |
February 28, 2011 |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
Forward foreign
exchange contracts |
|
$1,599 |
|
Revenue |
|
$1,302 |
|
Revenue |
|
$264 |
Forward foreign exchange
contracts |
|
$ 790 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ 39 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$397 |
Forward foreign exchange
contracts |
|
$ 140 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ (19) |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ 77 |
The following table presents the impact that changes in fair value of derivatives utilized for
foreign currency risk management purposes and designated as hedging instruments had on AOCI and
earnings during the six months ended February 28, 2010 (in thousands):
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
Derivatives in Cash |
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain (Loss) |
|
(Loss) |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
Income on Derivative |
Flow Hedging |
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Reclassified from |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
Relationship for the Six |
|
in OCI on |
|
AOCI |
|
AOCI |
|
and Amount Excluded |
|
and Amount Excluded |
Months Ended |
|
Derivative |
|
into Income |
|
into Income |
|
from Effectiveness |
|
from Effectiveness |
February 28, 2010 |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
Forward foreign
exchange contracts |
|
$ (4,508) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ (7,299) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ 44 |
Forward foreign exchange
contracts |
|
$ 4,369 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ 6,966 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$1,626 |
Forward foreign exchange
contracts |
|
$ (14) |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ (14) |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ 31 |
As of February 28, 2011, the Company estimates that it will reclassify into earnings during
the next 12 months existing gains related to foreign currency risk management hedging arrangements
of approximately $0.3 million from the amounts recorded in AOCI as the anticipated cash flows
occur.
The following table presents the impact that changes in fair value of derivatives utilized for
foreign currency risk management purposes and not designated as hedging instruments had on earnings
during the six months ended February 28, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in |
|
Income on Derivative for the Six months |
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
ended February 28, 2011 |
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$1,383 |
b. Interest Rate Risk Management
The Company periodically enters into interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk
associated with the Companys borrowings.
Fair Value Hedges
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company entered into a series of interest
rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $200.0 million designated as fair value hedges of a
portion of the Companys 7.750% Senior Notes. Under these interest rate swaps, the Company receives
fixed rate interest payments and pays interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR plus a spread. The
effect of these swaps is to convert fixed rate interest expense on a portion of the 7.750% Senior
Notes to floating rate
interest expense. Gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of the interest rate
swaps are recorded to interest expense and offset changes in the fair value of the hedged portion
of the underlying 7.750% Senior Notes. The fair value of the interest rate swaps, based on
observable market data (Level 2), was $0.6 million as of February 28, 2011 and was recorded to
other assets on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of February 28, 2010, the
Company had not entered into these interest rate swaps so there were no amounts outstanding. The
gains (losses) on the interest rate swaps and the underlying 7.750% Senior Notes recorded to
interest expense within the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/(Loss) for the Six Months |
|
Gain/(Loss) for the Six Months |
Instrument |
|
Ended February 28, 2011 |
|
Ended February 28, 2010 |
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
584.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.750% Senior Notes |
|
$ |
(584.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company entered into forward interest rate
swap transactions to hedge the fixed interest rate payments for an anticipated debt issuance, which
was the issuance of the 8.250% Senior Notes. The swaps were accounted for as a cash flow hedge and
had a notional amount of $400.0 million. Concurrently with the pricing of the 8.250% Senior Notes,
the Company settled the swaps by its payment of $43.1 million. The ineffective portion of the swaps
was immediately recorded
22
to interest expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The effective portion of the swaps is recorded on the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Balance Sheets as a component of AOCI and is being amortized to interest expense within the
Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations over the life of the 8.250% Senior Notes,
which is through March 15, 2018.
The following table presents the impact that changes in the fair value of the derivative
utilized for interest rate risk management and designated as a hedging instrument had on AOCI and
earnings for the six months ended February 28, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or |
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain (Loss) |
|
or (Loss) |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Reclassified from |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
|
in OCI on |
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
and Amount Excluded |
|
and Amount Excluded |
Hedging Relationship for the Six |
|
Derivative |
|
into Income |
|
into Income |
|
from Effectiveness |
|
from Effectiveness |
Months Ended February 28, 2011 |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
|
Interest expense |
|
$(1,954) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
The following table presents the impact that changes in the fair value of the derivative
utilized for interest rate risk management and designated as a hedging instrument had on AOCI and
earnings for the six months ended February 28, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or |
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
(Loss) Recognized in |
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
Location of Gain (Loss) |
|
or (Loss) |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Reclassified from |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion |
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
|
in OCI on |
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
and Amount Excluded |
|
and Amount Excluded |
Hedging Relationship for the Six |
|
Derivative |
|
into Income |
|
into Income |
|
from Effectiveness |
|
from Effectiveness |
Months Ended February 28, 2010 |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
Interest rate swap
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
Interest expense
|
|
$ |
(2,190 |
) |
|
Interest expense
|
|
$ |
As of February 28, 2011, the Company estimates that it will reclassify into earnings during
the next 12 months existing losses related to interest rate risk management hedging arrangements of
approximately $4.0 million from the amounts recorded in AOCI as the anticipated cash flows occur.
The following table presents the changes related to cash flow hedges included in AOCI net of
tax for the six months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, 2011 |
|
Accumulated comprehensive loss, August 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
(16,086 |
) |
Net gain for the period |
|
|
2,529 |
|
Net loss transferred to earnings |
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated comprehensive loss, February 28, 2011 |
|
$ |
(12,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, 2010 |
|
Accumulated comprehensive loss, August 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(18,861 |
) |
Net loss for the period |
|
|
(166 |
) |
Net loss transferred to earnings |
|
|
2,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated comprehensive loss, February 28, 2010 |
|
$ |
(16,490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Note 12. Income Taxes
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) completed its field examination of the Companys tax
returns for the fiscal years 2003 through 2005 and issued a Revenue Agents Report (RAR) on April
30, 2010 proposing adjustments primarily related to the IRS contentions that (1) certain corporate
expenses relate to services provided to foreign affiliates and therefore must be charged to those
affiliates, and (2) valuable intangible property was transferred to certain foreign affiliates
without charge. If the IRS ultimately prevails in its positions, the Companys income tax payment
due for the fiscal years 2003 through 2005 would be approximately an additional $69.3 million
before utilization of any tax attributes arising in periods subsequent to fiscal year 2005. In
addition, the IRS
23
will likely make similar claims in future audits with respect to these types of
transactions (at this time, determination of the additional income tax due for these later years is
not practicable). Also, the IRS has proposed interest and penalties on the Company with respect to
fiscal years 2003 through 2005, and the Company anticipates the IRS may seek to impose interest and
penalties in subsequent years with respect to the same types of issues.
The Company disagrees with the proposed adjustments and presently intends to vigorously
contest this matter through applicable IRS and judicial procedures, as appropriate. As the final
resolution of the proposed adjustments remains uncertain, the Company continues to provide for the
uncertain tax position based on the more likely than not standards. Accordingly, the Company did
not record any significant additional tax liabilities related to this RAR on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets for the six months ended February 28, 2011. While the resolution of the
issues may result in tax liabilities, interest and penalties, which are significantly higher than
the amounts provided for this matter, management currently believes that the resolution will not
have a material effect on the Companys financial position or liquidity. Despite this belief, an
unfavorable resolution, particularly if the IRS successfully asserts similar claims for later
years, could have a material effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition
(particularly in the quarter in which any adjustment is recorded or any tax is due or paid).
Note 13. Loss on Disposal of Subsidiaries
a. Jabil Circuit Automotive, SAS
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company sold its subsidiary, Jabil Circuit
Automotive, SAS, an automotive electronics manufacturing subsidiary located in Western Europe to an
unrelated third party. As a result of this sale, the Company recorded a loss on disposition of
$15.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, which included transaction-related costs of
approximately $4.2 million. These costs are recorded to loss on disposal of subsidiaries within the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, which is a component of operating income. Jabil
Circuit Automotive had net revenue and an operating loss of $15.5 million and $1.4 million,
respectively from the beginning of the 2010 fiscal year through the date of disposition.
b. French and Italian Subsidiaries
In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company sold F-I Holding Company, which
directly or indirectly wholly owns Competence France Holdings SAS, a French entity which wholly
owns Competence France SAS, and Competence EMEA S.r.l., an Italian entity which wholly owns
Competence Italia S.r.l. (Competence France Holdings SAS, Competence France SAS, Competence EMEA
S.r.l. and Competence Italia S.r.l. are collectively referred to as the Competence Sites
herein), to an unrelated third party. Divested operations, inclusive of four sites and
approximately 1,500 employees, had net revenues and an operating loss of $298.6 million and $39.6
million, respectively, from the beginning of the 2010 fiscal year through the date of disposition.
In connection with this transaction, the Company provided an aggregate $25.0 million
working capital loan to the disposed operations and agreed to provide for the aggregate potential
reimbursement of up to $10.0 million in restructuring costs dependent
upon the occurrence of certain future events. The working capital loan bears interest on a
quarterly basis at LIBOR plus 500 basis points and is repayable over approximately 44 months
dependent upon the achievement of certain specified quarterly financial results of the disposed
operations, which if not met, would result in the forgiveness of all or a portion of the loan.
Accordingly, dependent on the occurrence of such future events, the Company could have incurred up
to an additional $28.5 million of charges. As a result of this sale, the Company recorded a loss on
disposition of $8.9 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010, which included
transaction-related costs of $1.7 million and a charge of $6.5 million in order to record the
working capital loan at its respective fair value at August 31, 2010 based upon a discounted cash
flow analysis (Level 3). These costs were recorded to loss on disposal of subsidiaries within the
Consolidated Statements of Operations during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010, which is a
component of operating income.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company recorded an additional loss on
disposal of subsidiaries of $18.5 million within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
to fully write off the remaining balance of the working capital loan as it was deemed no longer
collectible by the Company. In addition, the Company recorded a charge of $5.4 million to loss on
disposal of subsidiaries within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations during the
second quarter of fiscal year 2011, as it was determined that a purchase price related receivable
that was due from the third party purchaser was no longer collectible. Refer to Note 14
Business Acquisitions for further discussion on the subsequent acquisition of the France and
Italian operations.
Note 14. Business Acquisitions
24
On February 21, 2011 the Company completed its acquisition of F-I Holding Company, which
directly or indirectly wholly owns the Competence Sites. The Competence Sites were former
operations of the Company and were previously disposed of in the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2010. Refer to Note 13 Loss on Disposal of Subsidiaries for further discussion of the previous
disposition. In order to reestablish viable operations, including the preservation of the
Companys relationship with certain global customers that the Company continued to serve outside of
its former French and Italian operations and jobs of former employees, the Company acquired the
entities owning the Competence Sites following multiple breaches by the third party purchaser. The
acquisition added approximately 1,500 employees to the Company.
In exchange for cash of approximately $0.5 million and certain mutual conditional
releases, the Company acquired a 100% equity interest in the Competence sites.
Simultaneously with this transaction, the Company recorded a settlement of pre-existing
receivables and other relationships with a fair value of $22.3 million that were outstanding
at the time of acquisition.
Immediately prior to the acquisition of the Competence Sites, the Company recognized a charge
of $12.7 million to record certain receivables and other relationships with the Competence Sites at
their respective fair values. This charge is included in settlement of receivables and related
charges within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months and six
months ended February 28, 2011. The fair values of these receivables and other obligations were
determined based on the probability evaluation of multiple scenarios under which the Competence
Sites could settle these liabilities.
Pursuant to the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations, the Company has
recognized acquisition costs and other related charges of $0.9 million to settlement of receivables
and related charges within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months
and six months ended February 28, 2011.
The acquisition of the Competence entities has been accounted for as a business combination
using the acquisition method. Assets acquired of $138.8 million and liabilities assumed of $116.0
million were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of
purchase price over the tangible assets and assumed liabilities of $20.3 million was recorded as
goodwill. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price was based upon a preliminary valuation
of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the Companys estimates and assumptions are
subject to change. The primary areas of the preliminary purchase price allocation that are not yet
finalized relate to the fair value of certain tangible assets and liabilities acquired and residual
goodwill. The Company expects to continue to obtain information to assist in determining the fair
value of the net assets acquired at the acquisition date and to finalize the purchase price
allocation in the third quarter of fiscal year 2011.
Note 15. New Accounting Guidance
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the
FASB) issued new accounting guidance for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. This
guidance impacts the determination of when the individual deliverables included in a
multiple-element arrangement may be treated as separate units of accounting. Additionally, this new
accounting guidance modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across
the separately identified deliverables by no longer permitting the residual method of allocating
arrangement consideration. The new guidance was effective for the Company prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year
2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Companys Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, the FASB amended its guidance on accounting for
variable interest entities (VIE). The new accounting guidance resulted in a change in the
Companys accounting policy effective September 1, 2010. Among other things, the new guidance
requires a qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of
a VIE, requires continuous assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a
VIE, enhances disclosures about an enterprises involvement with a VIE and amends certain guidance
for determining whether an entity is a VIE. Under the new guidance, a VIE must be consolidated if
the enterprise has both (a) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly
impact the entitys economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to
receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The adoption of
this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance on
accounting for transfers of financial assets. This new guidance became effective for the Company on
September 1, 2010. This guidance amends previous guidance by eliminating the concept of a
qualifying special-purpose entity, creating more stringent conditions for reporting a transfer of a
portion of a financial asset as a sale, clarifying other sale-accounting criteria and changing the
initial measurement of a transferors interest in transferred financial assets. Additionally, the
guidance requires extensive new disclosure regarding an entitys involvement in a transfer of
financial assets. As a result of the adoption of this new guidance, the accounts receivable
transferred under the asset-backed securitization program, prior to amendment on November 5, 2010,
no longer qualified for sale treatment and as such were accounted for as secured borrowings. During
the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, the program was amended to again be accounted for as a sale.
25
The amended program allows the Company to regularly sell a designated pool of trade accounts
receivable to a wholly-owned subsidiary, which in turn sells 100% of the eligible receivables to
conduits, administered by unaffiliated financial institutions. Refer to Note 8 Trade Accounts
Receivable Securitization and Sale Programs.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010, the FASB issued new disclosure guidance related to
the credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses. This new guidance
is effective for periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. This guidance requires companies to
provide more information about the credit quality of their financing receivables in the disclosures
to the financial statements including, but not limited to, significant purchases and sales of
financing receivables, aging information and credit quality indicators. This accounting guidance
did not have a significant impact on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 16. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events that occurred through the date of the filing of
the Companys second quarter of fiscal year 2011 Form 10-Q. No significant events occurred
subsequent to the balance sheet date and prior to the filing date of this report that would have a
material impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
26
JABIL CIRCUIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
References in this report to the Company, Jabil, we, our, or us
mean Jabil Circuit,
Inc. together with its subsidiaries, except where the context otherwise requires. This Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q contains certain statements that are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act) which are made in reliance upon the protections provided by such acts for forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements (such as when we describe what will, may, or
should occur, what we plan, intend, estimate, believe, expect or anticipate will
occur, and other similar statements) include, but are not limited to, statements regarding future
sales and operating results, future prospects, anticipated benefits of proposed (or future)
acquisitions, dispositions and new facilities, growth, the capabilities and capacities of business
operations, any financial or other guidance and all statements that are not based on historical
fact, but rather reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events. We make
certain assumptions when making forward-looking statements, any of which could prove inaccurate,
including, but not limited to, statements about our future operating results and business plans.
Therefore, we can give no assurance that the results implied by these forward-looking statements
will be realized. Furthermore, the inclusion of forward-looking information should not be regarded
as a representation by the Company or any other person that future events, plans or expectations
contemplated by the Company will be achieved. The ultimate correctness of these forward-looking
statements is dependent upon a number of known and unknown risks and events, and is subject to
various uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to be different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or
implied by these statements. The following important factors, among others, could affect future
results and events, causing those results and events to differ materially from those expressed or
implied in our forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
business conditions and growth or declines in our
customers industries, the electronic manufacturing
services industry and the general economy; |
|
|
|
|
variability of our operating results; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on a limited number of major customers; |
|
|
|
|
the potential consolidation of our customer base, and
the potential movement by some of our customers of a
portion of their manufacturing from us in order to
more fully utilize their excess internal
manufacturing capacity; |
|
|
|
|
availability of components; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on certain industries; |
|
|
|
|
our production levels are subject to the variability
of customer requirements, including seasonal
influences on the demand for certain end products; |
|
|
|
|
our substantial international operations, and the resulting risks related to our operating internationally; |
|
|
|
|
the current developing situation in Japan, as a result of the recent earthquake and tsunami, and its effects on our Japanese facility, supply chain, shipping costs,
customers and suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully negotiate definitive agreements and consummate dispositions and acquisitions, and to integrate operations following the consummation of
acquisitions; |
27
|
|
|
our ability to take advantage of our past, current and possible future restructuring efforts to improve utilization and realize savings and whether any such activity will
adversely affect our cost structure, our ability to service customers and our labor relations; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain our engineering, technological and manufacturing process expertise; |
|
|
|
|
other economic, business and competitive factors affecting our customers, our industry and our business generally; and |
|
|
|
|
other factors that we may not have currently identified or quantified. |
For a further list and description of various risks, relevant factors and uncertainties
that could cause future results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in
our forward-looking statements, see the Risk Factors and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections contained in this document, as well as our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010, any subsequent reports on
Form 10-Q and Form 8-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Given these
risks and uncertainties, the reader should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements.
All forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made
only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and we do not undertake any obligation
to publicly update or correct any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
that subsequently occur, or of which we hereafter become aware. You should read this document and
the documents that we incorporate by reference into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q completely
and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we
expect. We may not update these forward-looking statements, even if our situation changes in the
future. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified by these
cautionary statements.
|
|
|
Item 2: |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS |
Overview
We are one of the leading providers of worldwide electronic manufacturing services and
solutions. We provide comprehensive electronics design, production and product management services
to companies in the aerospace, automotive, computing, consumer, defense, industrial,
instrumentation, medical, networking, peripherals, solar, storage and telecommunications
industries. We serve our customers primarily with dedicated business units that combine highly
automated, continuous flow manufacturing with advanced electronic design and design for
manufacturability. We currently depend upon a relatively small number of customers for a
significant percentage of our revenue, net of estimated return costs (net revenue). Based on net
revenue, for the six months ended February 28, 2011 our largest customers currently include Apple
Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Ericsson, General Electric Company, Hewlett-Packard Company,
International Business Machines Corporation, NetApp, Inc., Pace plc, Research in Motion Limited and
Sony Corporation. For the six months ended February 28, 2011, we had net revenues of approximately
$8.0 billion and net income attributable to Jabil Circuit, Inc. of approximately $162.1 million.
We offer our customers comprehensive electronics design, production and product management
services that are responsive to their manufacturing and supply chain management needs. Our business
units are capable of providing our customers with varying combinations of the following services:
|
|
|
integrated design and engineering; |
|
|
|
|
component selection, sourcing and procurement; |
|
|
|
|
automated assembly; |
|
|
|
|
design and implementation of product testing; |
|
|
|
|
parallel global production; |
|
|
|
|
enclosure services; |
|
|
|
|
systems assembly, direct order fulfillment and configure to order; and |
|
|
|
|
aftermarket services. |
We currently conduct our operations in facilities that are located in Austria, Belgium,
Brazil, China, England, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico,
The Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Scotland, Singapore, Taiwan, Turkey,
28
Ukraine, the U.S. and
Vietnam. Our global manufacturing production sites allow customers to manufacture products
simultaneously in
the optimal locations for their products. Our services allow customers to improve supply-chain
management, reduce inventory obsolescence, lower transportation costs and reduce product
fulfillment time. We have identified our global presence as a key to assessing our business
opportunities.
On September 1, 2010, we reorganized our business into the following three segments:
Diversified Manufacturing Services (DMS), Enterprise & Infrastructure (E&I) and High Velocity
Systems (HVS). Our DMS segment is composed of dedicated resources to manage higher complexity
global products in regulated industries and bring materials and process technologies including
design and aftermarket services to our global customers. Our E&I and HVS segments offer integrated
global supply chain solutions designed to provide cost effective solutions for our customers. Our
E&I segment is focused on our customers primarily in the computing, storage, networking and
telecommunication sectors. Our HVS segment is focused on the particular needs of the consumer
products industry, including mobility, display, set-top boxes and peripheral products such as
printers and point of sale terminals.
The industry in which we operate is composed of companies that provide a range of
manufacturing and design services to companies that utilize electronics components. The industry
experienced rapid change and growth through the 1990s as an increasing number of companies chose to
outsource an increasing portion, and, in some cases, all of their manufacturing requirements. In
mid-2001, the industrys revenue declined as a result of significant cut-backs in customer
production requirements, which was consistent with the overall downturn in the technology sector at
the time. In response to this downturn in the technology sector, we implemented restructuring
programs to reduce our cost structure and further align our manufacturing capacity with the
geographic production demands of our customers. Industry revenues generally began to stabilize in
2003 and companies began to turn more to outsourcing versus internal manufacturing. In addition,
the number of industries serviced, as well as the market penetration in certain industries, by
electronic manufacturing service providers has increased over the past several years. In mid-2008,
the industrys revenue declined when a deteriorating macro-economic environment resulted in
illiquidity in the overall credit markets and a significant economic downturn in the North
American, European and Asian markets. In response to this downturn, we implemented additional
restructuring programs to reduce our cost structure and further align our manufacturing capacity
with the geographic production demands of our customers.
Though significant uncertainty remains regarding the extent and timing of the economic
recovery, we continue to see signs of stabilization as the overall credit markets have
significantly improved and it appears that the global economic stimulus programs put in place are
having a positive impact, particularly in China. We will continue to monitor the current economic
environment and its potential impact on both the customers that we serve as well as our end-markets
and closely manage our costs and capital resources so that we can respond appropriately as
circumstances continue to change. We will also continue to monitor the current developing situation
in Japan, as a result of the recent earthquake and tsunami, and its effects on our Japanese
facility, supply chain, shipping costs and suppliers.
Summary of Results
Net revenues for the second quarter of fiscal year 2011 increased approximately 30.8% to $3.9
billion compared to $3.0 billion for the same period of fiscal year 2010. These increases are
primarily due to increased revenue from existing customers, including new program wins with these
customers, as our customers confidence in their markets strengthen and their end-customers demand
levels increase.
The following table sets forth, for the three month and six month periods indicated, certain
key operating results and other financial information (in thousands, except per share data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Net revenue |
|
$ |
3,928,663 |
|
|
$ |
3,004,644 |
|
|
$ |
8,010,844 |
|
|
$ |
6,092,900 |
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
296,400 |
|
|
$ |
222,746 |
|
|
$ |
606,991 |
|
|
$ |
454,522 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
104,641 |
|
|
$ |
61,779 |
|
|
$ |
260,641 |
|
|
$ |
128,043 |
|
Net income attributable to Jabil Circuit, Inc |
|
$ |
55,403 |
|
|
$ |
29,830 |
|
|
$ |
162,080 |
|
|
$ |
58,118 |
|
Income per share basic |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
Income per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
Cash dividend per share declared |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
29
Key Performance Indicators
Management regularly reviews financial and non-financial performance indicators to assess the
Companys operating results. The following table sets forth, for the quarterly periods indicated,
certain of managements key financial performance indicators:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
February 28, |
|
November 30, |
|
August 31, |
|
May 31, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
Sales cycle |
|
11 days |
|
16 days |
|
17 days |
|
16 days |
Inventory turns |
|
7 turns |
|
7 turns |
|
7 turns |
|
7 turns |
Days in trade accounts receivable |
|
24 days |
|
26 days |
|
33 days |
|
33 days |
Days in inventory |
|
53 days |
|
52 days |
|
53 days |
|
50 days |
Days in accounts payable |
|
66 days |
|
62 days |
|
69 days |
|
67 days |
The sales cycle is calculated as the sum of days in trade accounts receivable and days in
inventory, less the days in accounts payable; accordingly, the variance in the sales cycle quarter
over quarter is a direct result of changes in these indicators. During the three months ended
February 28, 2011, days in trade accounts receivable decreased two days to 24 days as compared to
the prior sequential quarter as a result of increased use of our trade accounts receivable
securitization and sale programs, the timing of sales, focused efforts on cash collections during
the quarter and related seasonality factors. During the three months ended February 28, 2011, days
in inventory increased one day to 53 days as compared to the prior sequential quarter largely due
to the acquisition of operations in France and Italy. Inventory turns remained constant at seven
turns as compared to the prior sequential quarter. During the three months ended February 28, 2011,
days in accounts payable increased four days to 66 days as compared to the prior sequential
quarter, as a result of the timing of purchases and cash payments during the quarter, as well as
incremental accounts payable acquired in conjunction with our acquisition of operations in France
and Italy.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) requires management to
make estimates and judgments that affect our reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues
and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis,
we evaluate our estimates and assumptions based upon historical experience and various other
factors and circumstances. Management believes that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable
under the circumstances; however, actual results may vary from these estimates and assumptions
under different future circumstances. We have identified the following critical accounting policies
that affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements. For further discussion of our significant accounting policies,
refer to Note 1 Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2010.
Revenue Recognition
We derive revenue principally from manufacturing services related to electronic equipment
built to customer specifications. We also derive revenue to a lesser extent from aftermarket
services, design services and excess inventory sales. Revenue from product sales and excess
inventory sales is generally recognized, net of estimated product return costs, when goods are
shipped; title and risk of ownership have passed; the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable;
and recoverability is reasonably assured. Aftermarket service related revenue is recognized upon
completion of the services. Design service related revenue is generally recognized upon completion
and acceptance by the respective customer. We assume no significant obligations after product
shipment.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts related to receivables not expected to be
collected from our customers. This allowance is based on managements assessment of specific
customer balances, considering the age of receivables and financial stability of the customer. If
there is an adverse change in the financial condition and circumstances of our customers, or if
actual defaults are higher than provided for, an addition to the allowance may be necessary.
Inventory Valuation
We purchase inventory based on forecasted demand and record inventory at the lower of cost or
market. Management regularly assesses inventory valuation based on current and forecasted usage,
customer inventory-related contractual obligations and other lower of cost or market
considerations. If actual market conditions or our customers product demands are less favorable
than those projected, additional valuation adjustments may be necessary.
30
Long-Lived Assets
We review property, plant and equipment and amortizable intangible assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. Recoverability of property, plant and equipment is measured by comparing its
carrying value to the undiscounted projected cash flows that the asset(s) or asset group(s) are
expected to generate. If the carrying amount of an asset or an asset group is not recoverable, we
recognize an impairment loss based on the excess
of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset over its respective fair value, which is
generally determined as either the present value of estimated future cash flows or the appraised
value. The impairment analysis is based on significant assumptions of future results made by
management, including revenue and cash flow projections. Circumstances that may lead to impairment
of property, plant and equipment include unforeseen decreases in future performance or industry
demand and the restructuring of our operations resulting from a change in our business strategy or
adverse economic conditions.
We have recorded intangible assets, including goodwill, in connection with business
acquisitions. Estimated useful lives of amortizable intangible assets are determined by management
based on an assessment of the period over which the asset is expected to contribute to future cash
flows. The fair value of acquired amortizable intangible assets impacts the amounts recorded as
goodwill.
We perform a goodwill impairment analysis using the two-step method on an annual basis and
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. The recoverability of goodwill is measured at the reporting unit level, which we have
determined to be consistent with our operating segments, by comparing the reporting units carrying
amount, including goodwill, to the fair value of the reporting unit. We determine the fair value of
our reporting units based on an average weighting of both projected discounted future results and
the use of comparative market multiples. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its
fair value, goodwill is considered impaired and a second test is performed to measure the amount of
loss, if any.
We completed our annual impairment test for goodwill during the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2010 and determined that the fair values of our reporting units are substantially in excess of the
carrying values and that no impairment existed as of the date of the impairment test. In addition,
on September 1, 2010, we reorganized our business into the DMS, E&I and HVS segments. In doing so,
we reassigned goodwill to the new reporting units (which are deemed to be consistent with our
segments) and were required to perform an interim goodwill impairment test based on these new
reporting units. Based on this interim goodwill impairment test, we determined that the fair
values of our new reporting units are substantially in excess of the carrying values and no
impairment existed as of the date of the interim impairment test.
Restructuring and Impairment Charges
We have recognized restructuring and impairment charges related to reductions in workforce,
re-sizing and closure of certain facilities and the transition of production from certain
facilities into other new and existing facilities. These charges were recorded pursuant to formal
plans developed and approved by management and our Board of Directors. The recognition of
restructuring and impairment charges requires that we make certain judgments and estimates
regarding the nature, timing and amount of costs associated with these plans. The estimates of
future liabilities may change, requiring additional restructuring and impairment charges or the
reduction of liabilities already recorded. At the end of each reporting period, we evaluate the
remaining accrued balances to ensure that no excess accruals are retained and the utilization of
the provisions are for their intended purpose in accordance with the restructuring programs.
Retirement Benefits
We have pension and postretirement benefit costs and liabilities in certain foreign locations
that are developed from actuarial valuations. Actuarial valuations require management to make
certain judgments and estimates of discount rates, compensation rate increases and return on plan
assets. We evaluate these assumptions on a regular basis taking into consideration current market
conditions and historical market data. The discount rate is used to state expected future cash
flows at a present value on the measurement date. This rate represents the market rate for
high-quality fixed income investments. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit
obligations and increases pension expense. When considering the expected long-term rate of return
on pension plan assets, we take into account current and expected asset allocations, as well as
historical and expected returns on plan assets. Other assumptions include demographic factors such
as retirement, mortality and turnover. For further discussion of our pension and postretirement
benefits, refer to Note 9 Retirement Benefits to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Income Taxes
We estimate our income tax provision in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate, a
process that includes estimating exposures related to examinations by taxing authorities. We must
also make judgments regarding the ability to realize the deferred tax assets. The carrying value of
our net deferred tax assets is based on our belief that it is more likely than not that we will
generate sufficient future taxable income in certain jurisdictions to realize these deferred tax
assets. A valuation allowance has been established for deferred tax assets that we do not believe
meet the more likely than not criteria. We assess whether an uncertain tax position
31
taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return meets the threshold for recognition and measurement in the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Our judgments regarding future taxable income as well
as tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return may change due to changes in market
conditions, changes in tax laws or other factors. If our assumptions and consequently our estimates
change in the future, the valuation allowances and/or tax reserves established may be increased or
decreased, resulting in a respective increase or decrease in income tax expense.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) completed its field examination of our tax returns for
the fiscal years 2003 through 2005 and issued a Revenue Agents Report (RAR) on April 30, 2010
proposing adjustments primarily related to the IRS contentions that (1) certain corporate expenses
relate to services provided to foreign affiliates and therefore must be charged to those
affiliates, and (2) valuable intangible property was transferred to certain foreign affiliates
without charge. If the IRS ultimately prevails in its positions, our income tax payment due for the
fiscal years 2003 through 2005 would be approximately an additional $69.3 million before
utilization of any tax attributes arising in periods subsequent to fiscal year 2005. In addition,
the IRS will likely make similar claims in future audits with respect to these types of
transactions (at this time, determination of the additional income tax due for these later years is
not practicable). Also, the IRS has proposed interest and penalties on us with respect to fiscal
years 2003 through 2005, and we anticipate the IRS may seek to impose interest and penalties in
subsequent years with respect to the same types of issues.
We disagree with the proposed adjustments and presently intend to vigorously contest this
matter through applicable IRS and judicial procedures, as appropriate. As the final resolution of
the proposed adjustments remains uncertain, we continue to provide for the uncertain tax position
based on the more likely than not standards. Accordingly, we did not record any significant
additional tax liabilities related to this RAR on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for the
six months ended February 28, 2011. While the resolution of the issues may result in tax
liabilities, interest and penalties, which are significantly higher than the amounts provided for
this matter, management currently believes that the resolution will not have a material effect on
our financial position or liquidity. Despite this belief, an unfavorable resolution, particularly
if the IRS successfully asserts similar claims for later years, could have a material effect on our
results of operations and financial condition (particularly in the quarter in which any adjustment
is recorded or any tax is due or paid). For further discussion related to our income taxes, refer
to Note 12 Income Taxes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Risk Factors
We are subject to the risk of increased taxes and Note 4 Income Taxes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010.
Stock-Based Compensation
We recognize stock-based compensation expense within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations related to stock appreciation rights using a lattice model to determine the fair value.
Option pricing models require the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected life of
the option or stock appreciation right, risk-free rate, expected dividend yield and the price
volatility of the underlying stock. Judgment is also required in estimating the number of stock
awards that are expected to vest as a result of satisfaction of time-based vesting schedules or the
achievement of certain performance or market conditions. If actual results or future changes in
estimates differ significantly from our current estimates, stock-based compensation expense could
increase or decrease. For further discussion of our stock-based compensation, refer to Note 4 -
Stock-Based Compensation to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recent Accounting Guidance
See Note 15 New Accounting Guidance to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
a discussion of recent accounting guidance.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain statements of operations
data expressed as a percentage of net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Net revenue |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of revenue |
|
|
92.5 |
% |
|
|
92.6 |
% |
|
|
92.4 |
% |
|
|
92.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Restructuring and impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Settlement of receivables and related charges |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of subsidiaries |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
Other (income) expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests,
net of income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months and Six Months Ended February 28, 2011 Compared to the Three Months and
Six Months Ended February 28, 2010
Net Revenue. Our net revenue for the three months ended February 28, 2011 increased 30.8% to
$3.9 billion up from $3.0 billion for the three months ended February 28, 2010. Specific increases
include an 86% increase in the sale of specialized services products; a 36% increase in the sale of
instrumentation and healthcare products; a 27% increase in the sale of HVS products; a 20% increase
in the sale of industrial and CleanTech products; and a 19% increase in the sale of E&I products.
Our net revenue for the six months ended February 28, 2011 increased 31.5% to $8.0 billion up
from $6.1 billion for the six months ended February 28, 2010. Specific increases include a 69%
increase in the sale of specialized services products; a 50% increase in the sale of
instrumentation and healthcare products; a 25% increase in the sale of HVS products; a 24% increase
in the sale of industrial and CleanTech products; and a 24% increase in the sale of E&I products.
These increases for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011 are primarily due
to increased revenue from existing customers, including new program wins with these customers, as
our customers confidence in their markets strengthen and their end-customers demand levels
increase. These drivers of the net revenue increases may be negatively impacted by the current
developing situation in Japan (resulting from the recent earthquake and tsunami), and its effects
on our Japanese facility, supply chain, shipping costs, customers and suppliers.
Generally, we assess revenue on a global customer basis regardless of whether the growth is
associated with organic growth or as a result of an acquisition. Accordingly, we do not
differentiate or report separately revenue increases generated by acquisitions as opposed to
existing business. In addition, the added cost structures associated with our acquisitions have
historically been relatively insignificant when compared to our overall cost structure.
The distribution of revenue across our sectors has fluctuated, and will continue to fluctuate,
as a result of numerous factors, including but not limited to the following: fluctuations in
customer demand as a result of recent recessionary conditions; efforts to de-emphasize the economic
performance of certain sectors, most specifically, our former automotive sector; seasonality in our
business; and business growth from new and existing customers. As discussed in the Overview
section, on September 1, 2010, we reorganized our business into the following three segments: DMS,
E&I and HVS. In conjunction with this reorganization, there have been certain reclassifications
made within the reported sectors.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, revenue by segment expressed as a
percentage of net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
DMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialized Services |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
Industrial & CleanTech |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
Instrumentation & Healthcare |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
February 28, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Total DMS |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total E&I |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total HVS |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign source revenue represented 84.9% and 85.7% of net revenue for the three months
and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively. This is compared to 83.0% and 84.6% of net
revenue for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively. We currently
expect our foreign source revenue to slightly increase as compared to current levels over the
course of the next twelve months.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased to $296.4 million (7.5% of net revenue) and $607.0
million (7.6% of net revenue) for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011,
respectively, from $222.7 million (7.4% of net revenue) and $454.5 million (7.5% of net revenue)
for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively. The increase in gross
profit on an absolute basis and as a percentage of net revenue for the three months and six months
ended February 28, 2011 versus the same period in the prior fiscal year was primarily due to
increased revenue from existing customers, including new program wins with these customers, as our
customers confidence in their markets strengthen and their end-customers demand levels increase
which allow us to better utilize capacity and absorb fixed costs, an increased focus on controlling
costs and improving productivity and additional growth in the DMS segment, which typically has
higher margins than the E&I and HVS segments.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to
$141.8 million (3.6% of net revenue) for the three months ended February 28, 2011 from $146.3
million (4.9% of net revenue) for the three months ended February 28, 2010. This decrease was
largely due to $6.2 million in incremental stock-based compensation expense that was recognized in
the three months ended February 28, 2010 which resulted primarily from the modification of existing
equity awards to include retirement eligibility provisions, offset by additional salary expense
associated with increased headcount.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased to $284.3 million (3.5% of net revenue)
for the six months ended February 28, 2011 from $277.8 million (4.6% of net revenue) for the six
months ended February 28, 2010. This increase is largely due to additional salary expense
associated with increased headcount.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses decreased to $6.5 million (0.2% of
net revenue) and $12.3 million (0.2% of net revenue) for the three months and six months ended
February 28, 2011, respectively, from $7.4 million (0.2% of net revenue) and $15.1 million (0.2% of
net revenue) for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively. The
decrease is primarily due to the completion of certain research and development projects which were
moved into the production phase.
Amortization of Intangibles. We recorded $5.7 million and $11.6 million of amortization of
intangible assets for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively,
compared to $6.6 million and $13.7 million for the three months and six months ended February 28,
2010, respectively. The decrease is primarily attributable to certain intangible assets that became
fully amortized since February 28, 2010. For additional information regarding purchased
intangibles, see Note 7 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Restructuring and Impairment Charges.
a. 2009 Restructuring Plan
Upon the approval by our Board of Directors, we initiated a restructuring plan in the second
quarter of fiscal year 2009 (the 2009 Restructuring Plan). We have substantially completed
restructuring activities under this plan and expect to incur the remaining costs over the remainder
of fiscal year 2011.
During the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011, we reversed $0.2 million
and $0.1 million of previously recognized restructuring and impairment costs, respectively,
compared to charges of $0.3 million and $3.9 million of restructuring and impairment costs incurred
during the three months and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively. The reversal of
previously recognized restructuring and impairment costs during the three months and six months
ended February 28, 2011 are primarily related to revised estimates for lease commitment costs.
34
At February 28, 2011, accrued liabilities of approximately $0.1 million related to the
2009 Restructuring Plan are expected to be paid over the next fiscal quarter.
As of February 28, 2011, the 2009 Restructuring Plan is expected to yield annualized cost
savings of approximately $55.6 million, which we have now fully realized. The majority of these
annual cost savings are expected to be reflected as a reduction in cost of revenue, with a small
portion being reflected as a reduction of selling, general and administrative expense. These
expected annualized cost savings reflect a reduction in employee expense of approximately $42.4
million, a reduction in depreciation expense of approximately $5.9 million, a reduction in lease
commitment costs of approximately $0.1 million, a reduction of other manufacturing costs of
approximately $3.8 million and a reduction of selling, general and administrative expenses of
approximately $3.4 million.
As part of the 2009 Restructuring Plan, we have determined that it was more likely than not
that certain deferred tax assets would not be realized as a result of the contemplated
restructuring activities. Therefore, we recorded a valuation allowance of $14.8 million on net
deferred tax assets related to the 2009 Restructuring Plan. The valuation allowance is excluded
from the restructuring and impairment charges incurred through February 28, 2011 as it was recorded
to income tax expense within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
b. 2006 Restructuring Plan
Upon the approval by our Board of Directors, we initiated a restructuring plan in the fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2006 (the 2006 Restructuring Plan). We have substantially completed
restructuring activities under this plan and expect to incur the remaining costs over the remainder
of fiscal year 2011.
During the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011, we recorded approximately $0.4
million and $0.7 million of restructuring and impairment charges, respectively, compared to charges
of $0.3 million and $0.2 million of restructuring and impairment charges recognized for the three
months and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively. The restructuring and impairment costs
for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011 are primarily related to lease
commitment costs.
At February 28, 2011, liabilities of approximately $2.1 million related to the 2006
Restructuring Plan are expected to be paid out over the next twelve months. The remaining liability
of $0.6 million relates primarily to the charge for employee severance and termination benefits
payments.
Settlement of Receivables and Related Charges. We recorded a loss on settlement of
receivables and related charges of $13.6 million for the three months and six months ended February
28, 2011. On February 21, 2011 we completed our acquisition of F-I Holding Company, which directly
or indirectly wholly owns Competence France Holdings SAS, a French entity which wholly owns
Competence France SAS, and Competence EMEA S.r.l., an Italian entity which wholly owns Competence
Italia S.r.l. (Competence France Holdings SAS, Competence France SAS, Competence EMEA S.r.l. and
Competence Italia S.r.l. are collectively referred to as the Competence Sites herein). The
Competence Sites were our former operations and were previously disposed of on July 16, 2010.
Refer to Note 13 Loss on Disposal of Subsidiaries to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for further details.
Immediately prior to the acquisition of the Competence Sites, we recognized a charge of
$12.7 million to settlement of receivables and related charges within the Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011 in order to
record $35.0 million in receivables and other relationships with the Competence Sites at their
respective fair values. In addition, we recognized acquisition costs and other related charges of
$0.9 million to the settlement of receivables and related charges line within the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011.
Refer to Note 14 Business Acquisitions to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
further details.
Loss on Disposal of Subsidiaries. We recorded a loss on disposal of subsidiaries of $23.9
million for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011 and $15.7 million for the six
months ended February 28, 2010.
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, we sold the operations of Jabil Circuit Automotive,
SAS, an automotive electronic manufacturing subsidiary located in Western Europe to an unrelated
third party. In connection with this sale, we recorded a loss on disposition of approximately $15.7
million, which includes approximately $4.2 million in transaction costs incurred in connection with
the sale during the three months ended November 30, 2009.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010, we sold F-I Holding Company, which directly or
indirectly wholly owns the Competence Sites, to an unrelated third party. In connection with this
transaction, we provided an aggregate $25.0 million working capital loan to the disposed operations
and agreed to provide for the aggregate potential reimbursement of up to $10.0 million in
restructuring costs dependent upon the occurrence of certain future events. During the three months
ended February 28, 2011, we recorded a charge of $18.5 million to loss on disposal of subsidiaries
within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations to
35
fully write-off the remaining balance
of the working capital loan as we deemed it no longer collectible. In addition, during the three
months ended February 28, 2011, we recorded a charge of $5.4 million to loss on disposal of
subsidiaries within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations to write off a purchase
price related receivable that we were due from the third party purchaser as it was deemed no longer
collectible. Refer to Note 13 Loss on Disposal of Subsidiaries to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for further discussion.
Other Expense. We recorded other expense of $0.8 million and $0.6 million during the three
months and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively, as compared to $1.1 million and $2.2
million for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively. The decrease in
other expense was primarily due to an incremental gain that we recognized during the three months
and six months ended February 28, 2011 which was comprised of $0.6 million and $1.2 million,
respectively, associated with the purchase of receivables from an unrelated third party and an
incremental gain of $0.4 million associated with the sale of an available-for-sale security during
the six months ended February 28, 2011. In addition, for a portion of the six months ended February
28, 2011, $0.5 million related to the loss under the non-foreign asset-backed securitization
program was recorded to interest expense instead of other expense as the program was accounted for
as a secured borrowing during a portion of that time. This incremental gain was offset by
incremental expense of $0.4 million and $0.7 million recognized for the three months and six months
ended February 28, 2011, respectively, under trade accounts receivable programs that were entered
into during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2010. For further discussion of our trade
accounts receivable securitization and sales programs, see Note 8 Trade Accounts Receivable
Securitization and Sale Programs to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Interest Income. Interest income remained consistent at $0.7 million and $1.6 million for the
three months and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively, from $0.6 million and $1.6
million for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2010.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased to $25.8 million and $47.9 million for the three
months and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively, from $20.0 million and $40.1 million
for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively. The increase was
primarily due to interest associated with the issuance of our 5.625% Senior Notes during the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 and the refinancing of the credit
facility dated as of July 19, 2007 (the Old Credit Facility) at market rates during the second
quarter of fiscal year 2011.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense reflects an effective tax rate of 29.3% and 23.6% for the
three months and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively, compared to an effective tax
rate of 27.7% and 32.7% for the three months and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively.
The effective tax rate for the three months ended February 28, 2011 differs from the effective tax
rate for the three months ended February 28, 2010 due to the acquisition of previously divested
operations in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011. The effective tax rate for the six months
ended February 28, 2011 differs from the effective tax rate for the six months ended February 28,
2010 due to the sale of a French subsidiary in fiscal year 2010, offset by the acquisition of
previously divested operations in the second quarter of fiscal year 2011. Also, the tax rate is
predominantly a function of the mix of tax rates in the various jurisdictions in which we do
business. Most of our international operations have historically been taxed at a lower rate than in
the U.S., primarily due to tax incentives granted to our sites in Brazil, China, Hungary, Malaysia,
Poland, Singapore and Vietnam. The material tax incentives expire at various dates through 2020.
Such tax incentives are subject to conditions with which we expect to continue to comply. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates Income Taxes, Risk Factors We are subject to the risk of
increased taxes and Note 4 Income Taxes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010 for further discussion.
Non-U.S. GAAP Core Financial Measures
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
include certain non-U.S. GAAP financial measures as identified in the reconciliation below. The
non-U.S. GAAP financial measures disclosed herein do not have standard meaning and may vary from
the non-U.S. GAAP financial measures used by other companies or how we may calculate those measures
in other instances from time to time. Non-U.S. GAAP financial measures should not be considered a
substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with U.S.
GAAP. Also, our core financial measures should not be construed as an inference by us that our
future results will be unaffected by those items which are excluded from our core financial
measures.
Management believes that the non-U.S. GAAP core financial measures set forth below are
useful to facilitate evaluating the past and future performance of our ongoing manufacturing
operations over multiple periods on a comparable basis by excluding the effects of the amortization
of intangibles, restructuring and impairment charges, loss on disposal of subsidiaries and
stock-based compensation expense and related charges. Among other uses, management uses non-U.S.
GAAP core financial measures as a factor in determining employee performance when determining
incentive compensation.
36
We are reporting core operating income and core earnings to provide investors with an
additional method for assessing operating income and earnings, presenting what we believe are our
core manufacturing operations. Most of the items that are excluded for purposes of calculating
core operating income and core earnings also impacted certain balance sheet assets, resulting
in all or a portion of an asset being written off without a corresponding recovery of cash we may
have previously spent with respect to the asset. In the case of restructuring charges, we may be
making associated cash payments in the future. In addition, although, for purposes of calculating
core operating income and core earnings, we exclude stock-based compensation expense (which we
anticipate continuing to incur in the future) because it is a non-cash expense, the associated
stock issued may result in an increase in our outstanding shares of stock, which may result in the
dilution of our stockholders ownership interest. We encourage you to evaluate these items and the
limitations for purposes of analysis in excluding them.
Included in the table below is a reconciliation of the non-U.S. GAAP financial measures to the
most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures as provided in our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Operating income (U.S. GAAP) |
|
$ |
104,641 |
|
|
$ |
61,779 |
|
|
$ |
260,641 |
|
|
$ |
128,043 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
5,665 |
|
|
|
6,643 |
|
|
|
11,634 |
|
|
|
13,748 |
|
Stock-based compensation and related charges |
|
|
20,301 |
|
|
|
26,512 |
|
|
|
39,801 |
|
|
|
40,493 |
|
Restructuring and impairment charges |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
4,070 |
|
Settlement of receivables and related
charges |
|
|
13,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of subsidiaries |
|
|
23,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,944 |
|
|
|
15,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core operating income (Non-U.S. GAAP) |
|
$ |
168,354 |
|
|
$ |
95,569 |
|
|
$ |
350,255 |
|
|
$ |
202,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Jabil Circuit,
Inc. (U.S. GAAP) |
|
$ |
55,403 |
|
|
$ |
29,830 |
|
|
$ |
162,080 |
|
|
$ |
58,118 |
|
Amortization of intangibles, net of tax |
|
|
5,653 |
|
|
|
6,635 |
|
|
|
11,611 |
|
|
|
13,728 |
|
Stock-based compensation and related
charges, net of tax |
|
|
20,006 |
|
|
|
26,178 |
|
|
|
39,011 |
|
|
|
39,888 |
|
Restructuring and impairment charges, net
of tax |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
4,084 |
|
Settlement of receivables and related
charges |
|
|
13,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of subsidiaries, net of tax |
|
|
23,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,944 |
|
|
|
15,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core earnings (Non-U.S. GAAP) |
|
$ |
118,809 |
|
|
$ |
63,289 |
|
|
$ |
250,881 |
|
|
$ |
131,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: (U.S. GAAP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core earnings per share: (Non-U.S. GAAP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares used in the calculations of
earnings per share (U.S. GAAP & Non-U.S.
GAAP): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
215,170 |
|
|
|
213,625 |
|
|
|
214,781 |
|
|
|
214,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
221,022 |
|
|
|
214,760 |
|
|
|
219,469 |
|
|
|
215,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Core operating income for the three months ended February 28, 2011 increased 76.2% to $168.4
million compared to $95.6 million for the three months ended February 28, 2010. Core operating
income for the six months ended February 28, 2011 increased 73.3% to $350.3 million compared to
$202.1 million for the six months ended February 28, 2010. Core earnings for the three months
ended February 28, 2011 increased 87.7% to $118.8 million compared to $63.3 million for the three
months ended February 28, 2010. Core earnings for the six months ended February 28, 2011 increased
90.7% to $250.9 million compared to $131.5 million for the six months ended February 28, 2010.
These increases were the result of the same factors described above in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations For the Three Months and Six Months
Ended February 28, 2011 Compared to the Three Months and Six Months Ended February 28, 2010
Gross Profit.
Acquisitions and Expansion
As discussed in Note 13 Loss on Disposal of Subsidiaries and Note 14 Business
Acquisitions to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, on February 21, 2011 we completed
our acquisition of the Competence Sites in France and Italy. The Competence Sites were our former
operations and were previously disposed of on July 16, 2010. Refer to Note 13 Loss on Disposal
of Subsidiaries and Note 14 Business Acquisitions to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for further discussion. This acquisition, along with acquisitions in prior years, were
accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements include the operating results of each business from the date of acquisition. See Risk
Factors We have on occasion not achieved, and may not in the future achieve, expected
profitability from our acquisitions.
Seasonality
Production levels for the HVS segment are subject to seasonal influences. We may realize
greater net revenue during our first fiscal quarter due to higher demand for consumer related
products manufactured in the HVS segment during the holiday selling season. Therefore, quarterly
results should not be relied upon as necessarily being indicative of results for the entire fiscal
year.
Dividends
The following table sets forth certain information relating to our cash dividends declared to
common stockholders during fiscal years 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend |
|
Dividend |
|
Dividends |
|
Date of Record for |
|
Dividend Cash |
|
|
Declaration Date |
|
per Share |
|
Declared |
|
Dividend Payment |
|
Payment Date |
|
|
(in thousands, except for per share data) |
Fiscal year 2011: |
|
October 25, 2010 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,563 |
|
|
November 15, 2010 |
|
December 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 25, 2011 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,634 |
|
|
February 15, 2011 |
|
March 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2010: |
|
October 22, 2009 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,186 |
(1) |
|
November 16, 2009 |
|
December 1, 2009 |
|
|
January 22, 2010 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,238 |
|
|
February 16, 2010 |
|
March 1, 2010 |
|
|
April 14, 2010 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,221 |
|
|
May 17, 2010 |
|
June 1, 2010 |
|
|
July 22, 2010 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
15,247 |
|
|
August 16, 2010 |
|
September 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Of the $15.2 million in total dividends declared during the first quarter of fiscal
year 2010, $14.4 million was paid out of additional paid-in capital (which represents the
amount of dividends declared in excess of the Companys retained earnings balance at the
date that the dividends were declared). |
We currently expect to continue to declare and pay quarterly dividends of an amount similar to
our past declarations. However, the declaration and payment of future dividends are discretionary
and will be subject to determination by our Board of Directors each quarter following its review of
our financial performance.
38
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At February 28, 2011, our principle sources of liquidity consisted of cash, available
borrowings under our credit facilities and the accounts receivable securitization and uncommitted
sale programs.
The following table sets forth, for the six months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, selected
consolidated cash flow information (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
367,605 |
|
|
$ |
104,792 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(220,992 |
) |
|
|
(111,046 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
9,744 |
|
|
|
(66,579 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
|
(9,302 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
157,988 |
|
|
$ |
(82,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended February 28, 2011 was
approximately $367.6 million. This resulted primarily from net income of $163.1 million, a $178.3
million decrease in trade accounts receivable, $151.9 million in non-cash depreciation and
amortization expense and $39.8 million in non-cash stock-based compensation; which were partially
offset by a $104.3 million increase in inventories and an $84.7 million decrease in accounts
payable and accrued expenses. The decrease in trade accounts receivable was primarily driven by
improved cash collections partially offset by increased sales levels. The increase in inventories
was primarily due to the ramp up of inventory levels to support new business wins and higher
revenue levels. While we continue to monitor the current developing situation in Japan, as a result
of the recent earthquake and tsunami, and its effects on our supply chain, our inventories may
increase to an amount higher than planned due to the potential resulting components shortages.
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended February 28, 2011 was $221.0
million. This consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $207.3 million principally for
machinery and equipment for new business, including new process technology within our DMS segment,
maintenance levels of machinery and equipment and information technology infrastructure upgrades
and $33.2 million for the cost of receivables purchased from an unrelated third party, net of
collections; which were partially offset by $5.8 million of proceeds from the disposal of an
available for sale investment, $9.8 million of proceeds from the sale of property and equipment and
$4.0 million of net proceeds primarily from our acquisition of F-I Holding Company, which directly
or indirectly wholly owns the Competence Sites.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended February 28, 2011 was $9.7
million. This resulted from our receipt of approximately $3.1 billion of proceeds from borrowings
under existing debt agreements, which primarily included an aggregate of $2.6 billion of borrowings
under the Companys five year unsecured credit facility amended as of December 7, 2010 (the
Amended and Restated Credit Facility) and $400.0 million in borrowings as we completed the
offering of $400.0 million in aggregate principal amount of publicly-registered 5.625% senior
unsecured notes (the 5.625% Senior Notes). This was offset by repayments in an aggregate amount
of approximately $3.1 billion during the six months ended February 28, 2011, which primarily
included an aggregate of $2.6 billion of repayments under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility
and $340.0 million under the term portion of the Old Credit Facility. In addition, we paid $30.2
million of dividends to stockholders during fiscal year 2011.
We may need to finance day-to-day working capital needs, as well as future growth and any
corresponding working capital needs, with additional borrowings under the Amended and Restated
Credit Facility and our other revolving credit facilities described below, as well as additional
public and private offerings of our debt and equity. Currently, we have a shelf registration
statement with the SEC registering the potential sale of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity
securities in the future, from time to time, to augment our liquidity and capital resources.
In connection with our non-foreign asset-backed securitization program, we regularly sell a
designated pool of trade accounts receivable to a wholly-owned subsidiary, which in turn sells 100%
of the eligible receivables to conduits, administered by unaffiliated financial institutions. This
wholly-owned subsidiary is a separate bankruptcy-remote entity and its assets would be available
first to satisfy the creditor claims of the conduits. As the receivables sold are collected, the
wholly-owned subsidiary is able to sell additional receivables up to the maximum permitted amount
under the program. Net cash proceeds of $300.0 million are available at any one time under this
securitization program. Prior to September 1, 2010, the transactions in this program were accounted
for as sales under applicable accounting guidance. Effective September 1, 2010, we adopted new
accounting guidance that resulted in more stringent conditions for reporting the transfer of a
financial asset as a sale. As a result of the adoption of this new guidance, the accounts
receivable transferred under this program no longer qualified for sale treatment and as such were
accounted for as secured borrowings. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, this program was
amended to again account for the transfers of the applicable accounts receivable as sales. Under
the amended program any portion of the purchase price for the receivables which is not paid in cash
upon
39
the sale taking place is recorded as a deferred purchase price receivable, which is paid by
the conduits from available cash as payments on the receivables are collected. The securitization
program requires compliance with several financial covenants including an interest coverage ratio
and debt to EBITDA ratio, as defined in the securitization agreements. Net receivables sold under
this program are excluded from trade accounts receivable on our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets and are reflected as cash provided by operating activities on our Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows. We pay a fee on the unused portion of the program of 0.50% per annum
based on the average daily unused aggregate receivables sold during the period and a usage fee on
the utilized portion of the program equal to 0.95% per annum (inclusive of the unused fee) on the
average daily outstanding aggregate receivables sold during the immediately preceding calendar
month. The securitization conduits and the investors in the conduits have no recourse to our assets
for failure of debtors to pay when due. We continue to service, administer and collect the
receivables sold under this program and in exchange receive a servicing fee. Servicing fees
recognized during the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010 were not
material and are included in other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations. We do not record a servicing asset or liability as we estimate the fee we receive in
return for our obligation to service these receivables is at fair value. We sold $1.5 billion and
$2.9 billion of eligible trade accounts receivable during the three months and six months ended
February 28, 2011, respectively. In exchange, we received cash proceeds of $1.2 billion and $2.7
billion during the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively, and net
deferred purchase price receivables. At February 28, 2011, the deferred purchase price receivable
was approximately $218.4 million, which was recorded initially at fair value
as prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The
deferred purchase price receivable was valued using unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs), primarily
discounted cash flows, and due to its credit quality and short-term maturity the fair value
approximated book value. We sold $1.3 billion and $2.5 billion of eligible trade accounts
receivable during the three months and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively. In
exchange, we received cash proceeds of $1.1 billion and $2.3 billion during the three months and
six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively, and retained an interest in the receivables of
approximately $203.3 million at February 28, 2010. In connection with this securitization program,
we recognized pretax losses on the sales of receivables of approximately $0.9 million and $1.3
million during the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively, and
approximately $1.0 million and $2.0 million during the three months and six months ended February
28, 2010, respectively, which are recorded to other expense within the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations. Prior to execution of the previously discussed amendment, we recognized
interest expense of approximately $0.5 million during the first quarter of fiscal year 2011
associated with the secured borrowings. See Note 8 Trade Accounts Receivable Securitization
and Sale Programs and Note 15 New Accounting Guidance to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In connection with our factoring agreement, we transfer ownership of eligible trade accounts
receivable of a foreign subsidiary without recourse to a third party purchaser in exchange for
cash. The factoring of trade accounts receivable under this agreement is accounted for as a sale.
Proceeds on the transfer reflect the face value of the account less a discount. The discount is
recorded as a loss to other expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations in
the period of the sale. In March 2011, the factoring agreement was extended through September 30,
2011, at which time it is expected to automatically renew for an additional six-month period. The
receivables sold pursuant to this factoring agreement are excluded from trade accounts receivable
on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reflected as cash provided by operating
activities on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. We continue to service,
administer and collect the receivables sold under this program. Servicing fees recognized during
the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010 were not material. The third
party purchaser has no recourse to our assets for failure of debtors to pay when due. We had sold
$12.8 million and $18.1 million of trade accounts receivable at February 28, 2011 and 2010,
respectively, and in exchange, received cash proceeds of $12.8 million and $18.1 million at
February 28, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The resulting losses on the sales of trade accounts
receivables sold under this factoring agreement were recorded to other expense within the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Under two separate uncommitted accounts receivable sale programs with banks we, and certain of
our subsidiaries, can elect to sell and the banks can elect to purchase at a discount, on an
ongoing basis, up to a maximum of $200.0 million and $150.0 million of specific trade accounts
receivable at any one time. The programs are accounted for as sales. Net receivables sold under the
programs are excluded from trade accounts receivable on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
and are reflected as cash provided by operating activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows. The $200.0 million and $150.0 million sale programs expire on May 25, 2011 and
August 24, 2011, respectively.
We continue to service the receivables sold under each trade accounts receivable sales program
in exchange for a servicing fee. Servicing fees recognized during the three months and six months
ended February 28, 2011 were not material and are included in other expense within the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations. We do not record a servicing asset or liability on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as we estimate the fee we receive in return for our
obligation to service these receivables is at fair value. For the three months and six months ended
February 28, 2011, we had sold $649.0 million and $1.1 billion, respectively, of trade accounts
receivable pursuant to the agreements discussed in the immediately preceding paragraph. In
exchange, we received cash proceeds of $648.6 million and $1.1 billion, respectively. The resulting
losses on the sale of trade accounts receivable sold under this sales program was $0.4 million and
$0.7 million for three months and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively, which was
recorded to other expense within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Notes payable and long-term debt outstanding at February 28, 2011 and August 31, 2010 are
summarized below (in thousands):
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 28, |
|
|
August 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
7.750% Senior Notes due 2016 (a) |
|
$ |
302,632 |
|
|
$ |
301,782 |
|
8.250% Senior Notes due 2018 (b) |
|
|
397,328 |
|
|
|
397,140 |
|
5.625% Senior Notes due 2020 (c) |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit facilities (d) |
|
|
77,150 |
|
|
|
73,750 |
|
Borrowings under loans (e) |
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
342,380 |
|
Securitization program obligations (f) |
|
|
57,953 |
|
|
|
71,436 |
|
Miscellaneous borrowings |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Fair value adjustment (g) |
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
1,238,055 |
|
|
$ |
1,186,496 |
|
Less current installments of notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
137,508 |
|
|
|
167,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and long-term debt, less current installments |
|
$ |
1,100,547 |
|
|
$ |
1,018,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, we issued a total of $312.0 million,
seven-year, publicly-registered senior unsecured notes (the 7.750% Senior Notes) at 96.1% of
par, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $300.0 million. The 7.750% Senior Notes mature
on July 15, 2016 and pay interest semiannually on January 15 and July 15. Also, the 7.750%
Senior Notes are our senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all other existing and
future senior unsecured debt obligations. We are subject to covenants such as limitations on
our and/or our subsidiaries ability to: consolidate or merge with, or convey, transfer or
lease all or substantially all of our assets to, another person; create certain liens; enter
into sale and leaseback transactions; create, incur, issue, assume or guarantee funded debt
(which only applies to our restricted subsidiaries); and guarantee any of our indebtedness
(which only applies to our subsidiaries). We are also subject to a covenant requiring our
repurchase of the 7.750% Senior Notes upon a change of control repurchase event. |
|
(b) |
|
During the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2008, we issued $250.0 million and $150.0
million, respectively, of ten-year, unregistered 8.250% notes at 99.965% of par and 97.5% of
par, respectively, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $245.7 million and $148.5
million, respectively. On July 18, 2008, we completed an exchange whereby all of the
outstanding unregistered 8.250% Notes were exchanged for registered 8.250% Notes (collectively
the 8.250% Senior Notes) that are substantially identical to the unregistered notes except
that the 8.250% Senior Notes are registered under the Securities Act and do not have any
transfer restrictions, registration rights or rights to additional special interest. |
|
|
|
The 8.250% Senior Notes mature on March 15, 2018 and pay interest semiannually on March 15 and
September 15. The interest rate payable on the 8.250% Senior Notes is subject to adjustment
from time to time if the credit ratings assigned to the 8.250% Senior Notes increase or
decrease, as provided in the 8.250% Senior Notes. The 8.250% Senior Notes are our senior
unsecured obligations and rank equally with all other existing and future senior unsecured debt
obligations. |
|
|
|
We are subject to covenants such as limitations on our and/or our subsidiaries ability to:
consolidate or merge with, or convey, transfer or lease all or substantially all of our assets
to, another person; create certain liens; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; create,
incur, issue, assume or guarantee any funded debt (which only applies to our restricted
subsidiaries); and guarantee any of our indebtedness (which only applies to our subsidiaries).
We are also subject to a covenant requiring our repurchase of the 8.250% Senior Notes upon a
change of control repurchase event. |
|
(c) |
|
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, we issued the 5.625% Senior Notes at par. The
net proceeds from the offering of $400.0 million were used to fully repay the term portion of
the Old Credit Facility and partially repay amounts outstanding under our foreign asset-backed
securitization program. The 5.625% Senior Notes mature on December 15, 2020. Interest on the
5.625% Senior Notes is payable semiannually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning
on June 15, 2011. The 5.625% Senior Notes are our senior unsecured obligations and rank
equally with all other existing and future senior unsecured debt obligations. We are subject
to covenants such as limitations on our and/or our subsidiaries ability to: consolidate or
merge with, or convey, transfer or lease all or substantially all of our assets to, another
person; create certain liens; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; create, incur,
issue, assume or guarantee any funded debt (which only applies to our restricted
subsidiaries); and guarantee any of our indebtedness (which only applies to our
subsidiaries). We are also subject to a covenant requiring our repurchase of the 5.625% Senior
Notes upon a change of control repurchase event. |
|
(d) |
|
As of February 28, 2011, three of our foreign subsidiaries have entered into credit
facilities to finance their future growth and any corresponding working capital needs. The
credit facilities are denominated in U.S. dollars. The credit facilities incur interest at
fixed and variable rates ranging from 1.82% to 4.02%. |
41
|
|
|
(e) |
|
On December 7, 2010, we amended and restated the five-year Old Credit Facility (the
Amended and Restated Credit Facility). The Amended and Restated Credit Facility provides
for a revolving credit in the amount of $1.0 billion, subject to potential increases up to
$1.3 billion, and expires on December 7, 2015. Some or all of the lenders under the Amended
and Restated Credit Facility and their affiliates have various other relationships with us and
our subsidiaries involving the provision of financial services, including cash management,
loans, letter of credit and bank guarantee facilities, investment banking and trust services.
We, along with some of our subsidiaries, have entered into foreign exchange contracts and
other derivative arrangements with certain of the lenders and their affiliates. In addition,
many if not most of the agents and lenders under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility held
positions as agent and/or lender under our Old Credit Facility. Interest and fees on the
Amended and Restated Credit Facility advances are based on our non-credit enhanced long-term
senior unsecured debt rating as determined by S&P and Moodys. Interest is charged at a rate
equal to either 0.40% to 1.50% above the base rate or 1.40% to 2.50% above the Eurocurrency
rate, where the base rate represents the greatest of Citibank, N.A.s prime rate, 0.50% above
the federal funds rate or 1.0% above one-month LIBOR, and the Eurocurrency rate represents
adjusted London Interbank Offered Rate for the applicable interest period, each as more fully
described in this credit agreement. Fees include a facility fee based on the revolving credit
commitments of the lenders and a letter of credit fee based on the amount of outstanding
letters of credit. We, along with our subsidiaries, are subject to the following financial
covenants: (1) a maximum ratio of (a) Debt (as defined in the credit agreement) to (b)
Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) and (2) a minimum ratio of (a)
Consolidated EBITDA to (b) interest payable on, and amortization of debt discount in respect
of, all Debt (as defined in the credit agreement) and loss on sale of trade accounts
receivables pursuant to any of our, or our subsidiaries, securitization programs. In addition,
we are subject to other covenants, such as: limitation upon liens; limitation upon mergers,
etc.; limitation upon accounting changes; limitation upon subsidiary debt; limitation upon
sales, etc. of assets; limitation upon changes in nature of business; payment restrictions
affecting subsidiaries; compliance with laws, etc.; payment of taxes, etc.; maintenance of
insurance; preservation of corporate existence, etc.; visitation rights; keeping of books;
maintenance of properties, etc.; transactions with affiliates; and reporting requirements. |
|
|
|
During the three months ended February 28, 2011, we borrowed and repaid $1.4 billion against the
Amended and Restated Credit Facility under multiple draws. These borrowings were repaid in full
during the second quarter of fiscal year 2011. A draw in the amount of $400.0 million was made
under the term portion of the Old Credit Facility in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, and
was repaid in full during the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. |
|
|
|
In addition to the loans described above, at February 28, 2011, we have additional loans
outstanding to fund working capital needs. These additional loans total approximately $2.4
million and are denominated in Euros. The loans are due and payable within 12 months and are
classified as short-term on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
(f) |
|
In connection with the securitization program, certain of our foreign subsidiaries sell, on
an ongoing basis, an undivided interest in designated pools of trade accounts receivable to a
special purpose entity, which in turn borrows up to $100.0 million from a third party bank and
grants a security interest in the accounts receivable as collateral for the borrowings. The
securitization program is accounted for as a borrowing. We have the power to direct the
activities of the special purpose entity and the obligation to absorb the majority of the
expected losses or the right to receive benefits from the transfer of trade accounts
receivable into the special purpose entity and, as such, are deemed the primary beneficiary.
Accordingly, we consolidate the special purpose entity. The loan balance is calculated based
on the terms of the securitization program agreements. The securitization program requires
compliance with several covenants including a limitation on certain corporate actions such as
mergers, consolidations and sale of substantially all assets. We pay interest at designated
commercial paper rates plus a spread. The securitization program expires on May 20, 2011.
We continue servicing the receivables in the program and in exchange receive a servicing
fee. Servicing fees recognized during the three months and six months ended February 28, 2011
and 2010 were not material and are included in interest expense within the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations. We do not record a servicing asset or liability on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as we estimate the fee we receive in return for our
obligation to service these receivables is at fair value. We had $58.0 million and $111.2
million of debt outstanding under the program at February 28, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In
addition, we incurred interest expense of $0.4 million and $0.6 million recorded within the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations during the three months and six months ended
February 28, 2011, respectively, compared to $0.7 million and $1.4 million for the three
months and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively. |
|
(g) |
|
This amount represents the fair value hedge accounting adjustment related to the 7.750%
Senior Notes. For further discussion of our fair value hedges, see Note 11 Derivative
Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
At February 28, 2011 and 2010, we were in compliance with all covenants under the Amended and
Restated Credit Facility and our securitization programs.
42
Our working capital requirements and capital expenditures could continue to increase in order
to support future expansions of our operations through construction of greenfield operations or
acquisitions. It is possible that future expansions may be significant and may require the payment
of cash. Future liquidity needs will also depend on fluctuations in levels of inventory and
shipments, changes in customer order volumes and timing of expenditures for new equipment.
For discussion of our cash management and risk management policies, see Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We currently anticipate that during the next 12 months, our capital expenditures will be in
the range of $375.0 million to $425.0 million, principally for machinery and equipment for new
business, including new process technology within our DMS segment, maintenance levels of machinery
and equipment and information technology infrastructure upgrades. We believe that our level of
resources, which include cash on hand, available borrowings under our revolving credit facilities,
additional proceeds available under our trade accounts receivable securitization programs and
potentially available under our uncommitted trade accounts receivable sale programs and funds
provided by operations, will be adequate to fund these capital expenditures, the payment of any
declared quarterly dividends, payments for current and future restructuring activities and our
working capital requirements for the next 12 months. Our $300.0 million asset-backed securitization
program expires in November 2011, our $100.0 million foreign asset-backed securitization program
expires in May 2011 and our $200.0 million and $150.0 million uncommitted trade accounts receivable
sale programs expire in May 2011 and August 2011, respectively, and we may be unable to renew any
or all of them.
Should we desire to consummate significant additional acquisition opportunities or undertake
significant additional expansion activities, our capital needs would increase and could possibly
result in our need to increase available borrowings under our revolving credit facilities or access
public or private debt and equity markets. There can be no assurance, however, that we would be
successful in raising additional debt or equity on terms that we would consider acceptable.
Our contractual obligations for short and long-term debt arrangements, future interest on
notes payable and long-term debt, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating
lease arrangements, estimated future benefit payments to plan and capital commitments as of
February 28, 2011 are summarized below. We do not participate in, or secure financing for, any
unconsolidated limited purpose entities. We generally do not enter into non-cancelable purchase
orders for materials until we receive a corresponding purchase commitment from our customer.
Non-cancelable purchase orders do not typically extend beyond the normal lead time of several weeks
at most. Purchase orders beyond this time frame are typically cancelable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period (in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
4-5 years |
|
|
years |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,238,055 |
|
|
$ |
137,508 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,100,545 |
|
Future interest on notes payable and long-term debt (a) |
|
|
589,980 |
|
|
|
80,787 |
|
|
|
161,131 |
|
|
|
161,352 |
|
|
|
186,710 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
181,259 |
|
|
|
46,613 |
|
|
|
66,651 |
|
|
|
39,456 |
|
|
|
28,539 |
|
Estimated future benefit payments to plan |
|
|
51,478 |
|
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
|
9,341 |
|
|
|
10,263 |
|
|
|
27,309 |
|
Capital commitments (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations (c) |
|
$ |
2,060,772 |
|
|
$ |
269,473 |
|
|
$ |
237,125 |
|
|
$ |
211,071 |
|
|
$ |
1,343,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
At February 28, 2011, our notes payable and long-term debt pay interest at predominately
fixed rates. |
|
(b) |
|
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, we committed $10.0 million to an independent
private equity limited partnership which invests in companies that address resource limits in
energy, water and materials (commonly referred to as the CleanTech sector). Of that amount,
we have invested $5.2 million as of February 28, 2011. The remaining commitment of $4.8
million is callable over the next 30 months by the general partner. As the capital calls have
no specified timing, this commitment has been excluded from the above table as we cannot
currently determine when such commitment calls will occur. |
|
(c) |
|
At February 28, 2011, we have $2.4 million and $91.9 million recorded as a current and a
long-term liability, respectively, for uncertain tax positions. We are not able to reasonably
estimate the timing of payments, or the amount by which our liability for these uncertain tax
positions will increase or decrease over time, and accordingly, this liability has been
excluded from the above table. |
43
Item 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency Exchange Risks
We transact business in various foreign countries and are, therefore, subject to risk of
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. We enter into forward contracts to economically hedge
transactional exposure associated with commitments arising from trade accounts receivable, trade
accounts payable, intercompany transactions and fixed purchase obligations denominated in a
currency other than the functional currency of the respective operating entity. We do not intend to
use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. All derivative instruments are
recorded on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at their respective fair values. At February
28, 2011, except for certain foreign currency contracts, with a notional amount outstanding of
$137.0 million and a fair value of $1.5 million recorded in prepaid and other current assets and
$0.5 million recorded in accrued expenses, we have elected not to prepare and maintain the
documentation required for the transactions to qualify as accounting hedges and, therefore, changes
in fair value are recorded within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The aggregate notional amount of outstanding contracts at February 28, 2011 that do not
qualify as accounting hedges was $654.3 million. The fair value of these contracts amounted to a
$3.6 million asset recorded in prepaid and other current assets and a $3.4 million liability
recorded to accrued expenses on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The forward contracts
will generally expire in less than four months, with ten months being the maximum term of the
contracts outstanding at February 28, 2011. Upon expiration of the contracts, the change in fair
value will be reflected in cost of revenue within our Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The forward contracts are denominated in Brazilian real, British pounds, Chinese yuan
renminbis, Euros, Hungarian forints, Indian rupees, Japanese yen, Malaysian ringgits, Mexican
pesos, Polish zlotys, Russian rubles, Singapore dollars and U.S. dollars.
Interest Rate Risk
A portion of our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to our domestic
investment portfolio. We do not, and do not intend to, use derivative financial instruments for
speculative purposes. We place cash and cash equivalents with various major financial institutions.
We protect our invested principal funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment
risk. We mitigate these risks by generally investing in investment grade securities and by
frequently positioning the portfolio to try to respond appropriately to a reduction in credit
rating of any investment issuer, guarantor or depository to levels below the credit ratings
dictated by our investment policy. The portfolio typically includes only marketable securities with
active secondary or resale markets to ensure portfolio liquidity. At February 28, 2011, there were
no significant outstanding investments.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, we entered into interest rate swap transactions
with a notional amount of $200.0 million designated as fair value hedges of a portion of our 7.750%
Senior Notes. Under these interest rate swaps, we receive fixed rate interest payments and pay
interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR plus a spread. The effect of these swaps is to convert
fixed rate interest expense on a portion of the 7.750% Senior Notes to floating rate interest
expense. Gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are
included in interest expense and offset changes in the fair value of the hedged portion of the
underlying hedged 7.750% Senior Notes. The fair value of the interest rate swaps was $0.6 million
as of February 28, 2011 and was recorded in other assets on our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet. There were no amounts outstanding at February 28, 2010.
We pay interest on several of our outstanding borrowings at interest rates that fluctuate
based upon changes in various base interest rates. There were $135.1 million in borrowings
outstanding under these facilities at February 28, 2011. See Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources and Note 10
Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information regarding our outstanding debt obligations.
Item 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act (the
Evaluation), under the supervision and with the participation of our President and Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act
(Disclosure Controls) as of February 28, 2011. Based on the Evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded
that the design and operation of our Disclosure Controls were effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and
(ii) accumulated and communicated to our senior management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
44
For our fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2011, we did not identify any modifications to our
internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Our internal control over financial reporting, including our internal control documentation
and testing efforts, remain ongoing to ensure continued compliance with the Exchange Act. For our
fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2011, we identified certain internal controls that management
believed should be modified to improve them. These improvements include further formalization of
policies and procedures, improved segregation of duties, additional information technology system
controls and additional monitoring controls. We are making improvements to our internal control
over financial reporting as a result of our review efforts. We have reached our conclusions set
forth above, notwithstanding those improvements and modifications.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls and Other Matters
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and
internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system,
no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must
reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of
fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of
simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls may be circumvented by the individual acts of some
persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Notwithstanding the foregoing limitations on the effectiveness of controls, we have
nonetheless reached the conclusions set forth above on our disclosure controls and procedures and
our internal control over financial reporting.
On February 21, 2011, we entered into an agreement to acquire F-I Holding Company, which
directly or indirectly wholly owns the Competence Sites. The scope of our evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2011 did not include the internal control over
financial reporting of the acquired Competence Sites. From the date that we acquired F-I Holding
Company to February 28, 2011, the processes and systems of the acquired Competence Sites were
discrete and did not significantly impact our internal control over financial reporting.
CEO and CFO Certifications
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are the Certifications of the CEO and the CFO, respectively. The
Certifications are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the
Section 302 Certifications). This Item of this report, which you are currently reading is the
information concerning the Evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and this
information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete
understanding of the topics presented.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are party to certain lawsuits in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that
these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
45
Item 1A: Risk Factors
As referenced, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes certain forward-looking statements
regarding various matters. The ultimate correctness of those forward-looking statements is
dependent upon a number of known and unknown risks and events, and is subject to various
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to
be different from those expressed or implied by those statements. Undue reliance should not be
placed on those forward-looking statements. The following important factors, among others, as well
as those factors set forth in our other SEC filings from time to time, could affect future results
and events, causing results and events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our
forward-looking statements.
Our operating results may fluctuate due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our
control.
Our annual and quarterly operating results are affected by a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
adverse changes in current macro-economic conditions, both in the U.S. and
internationally; |
|
|
|
|
the current developing situation in Japan, as a result of the recent earthquake and
tsunami, and its effects on our Japanese facility, supply chain, shipping costs,
customers and suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
the level and timing of customer orders; |
|
|
|
|
the level of capacity utilization of our manufacturing facilities and associated
fixed costs; |
|
|
|
|
the composition of the costs of revenue between materials, labor and manufacturing
overhead; |
|
|
|
|
price competition; |
|
|
|
|
changes in demand for our products or services; |
|
|
|
|
changes in demand in our customers end markets; |
|
|
|
|
our exposure to financially troubled customers; |
|
|
|
|
our level of experience in manufacturing a particular product; |
|
|
|
|
the degree of automation used in our assembly process; |
|
|
|
|
the efficiencies achieved in managing inventories and fixed assets; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in materials costs and availability of materials; |
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in political conditions, both in the U.S. and internationally,
including among other things, adverse changes in tax laws and rates (and the governments
interpretations thereof), adverse changes in trade policies and adverse changes in fiscal
and monetary policies; |
|
|
|
|
seasonality in customers product requirements; and |
|
|
|
|
the timing of expenditures in anticipation of increased sales, customer product
delivery requirements and shortages of components or labor. |
The volume and timing of orders placed by our customers vary due to variation in demand for
our customers products; our customers attempts to manage their inventory; electronic design
changes; changes in our customers manufacturing strategies; and acquisitions of or consolidations
among our customers. In addition, our sales associated with consumer related products are subject
to seasonal influences. We may realize greater revenue during our first fiscal quarter due to high
demand for consumer related products during the holiday selling season. In the past, changes in
customer orders that reduce net revenue have had a significant effect on our results of operations
as a result of our overhead remaining relatively fixed while our net revenue decreased. Any one or
a combination of these factors could adversely affect our annual and quarterly results of
operations in the future. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations Results of Operations.
Because we depend on a limited number of customers, a reduction in sales to any one of our
customers could cause a significant decline in our revenue.
For the six months ended February 28, 2011, our five largest customers accounted for
approximately 47% of our net revenue and our top 49 customers accounted for approximately 90% of
our net revenue. We currently depend, and expect to continue to depend, upon a relatively small
number of customers for a significant percentage of our net revenue and upon their growth,
viability and financial stability. If any of our customers experience a decline in the demand for
their products due to economic or other forces, they may reduce their purchases from us or
terminate their relationship with us. Our customers industries have experienced rapid
technological change, shortening of product life cycles, consolidation, and pricing and margin
pressures. Consolidation among our customers may further reduce the number of customers that generate a significant percentage of
our net revenue and exposes us to
46
increased risks relating to dependence on a small number of
customers. A significant reduction in sales to any of our customers or a customer exerting
significant pricing and margin pressures on us could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations. In the past, some of our customers have terminated their manufacturing arrangements
with us or have significantly reduced or delayed the volume of design, production or product
management services ordered from us, including moving a portion of their manufacturing from us in
order to more fully utilize their excess internal manufacturing capacity.
Our revenues declined in 2009 as consumers and businesses postponed spending in response to
tighter credit, negative financial news, declines in income or asset values or general uncertainty
about global economic conditions. These economic conditions had a negative impact on our results of
operations over this period and similar conditions may exist in the future. In addition, some of
our customers have moved a portion of their manufacturing from us in order to more fully utilize
their excess internal manufacturing capacity. We cannot assure you that present or future customers
will not terminate their design, production and product management services arrangements with us or
significantly change, reduce or delay the amount of services ordered from us. If they do, it could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, we generate significant
accounts receivable in connection with providing design, production and product management services
to our customers. If one or more of our customers were to become insolvent (which two of our
customers experienced in fiscal year 2009) or otherwise were unable to pay for the services
provided by us on a timely basis, or at all, our operating results and financial condition could be
adversely affected. In addition, our operating results and financial condition could be adversely
affected by the potential recovery by the bankruptcy estate of amounts previously paid to us by a
customer that later became insolvent that are deemed a preference under bankruptcy law. Such
adverse effects could include one or more of the following: a decline in revenue, a charge for bad
debts, a charge for inventory write-offs, a decrease in inventory turns, an increase in days in
inventory and an increase in days in trade accounts receivable.
Certain of the industries to which we provide services, have recently experienced
significant financial difficulty, with some of the participants filing for bankruptcy. Such
significant financial difficulty has negatively affected our business and, if further experienced
by one or more of our customers, may further negatively affect our business due to the decreased
demand of these financially distressed customers, the potential inability of these companies to
make full payment on amounts owed to us, or both. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Risk Factors We face certain risks in
collecting our trade accounts receivable.
Consolidation in industries that utilize electronics components may adversely affect our business.
Consolidation in industries that utilize electronics components may further increase as
companies combine to achieve further economies of scale and other synergies, which could result in
an increase in excess manufacturing capacity as companies seek to divest manufacturing operations
or eliminate duplicative product lines. Excess manufacturing capacity may increase pricing and
competitive pressures for our industry as a whole and for us in particular. Consolidation could
also result in an increasing number of very large companies offering products in multiple
industries. The significant purchasing power and market power of these large companies could
increase pricing and competitive pressures for us. If one of our customers is acquired by another
company that does not rely on us to provide services and has its own production facilities or
relies on another provider of similar services, we may lose that customers business. Such
consolidation among our customers may further reduce the number of customers that generate a
significant percentage of our net revenue and exposes us to increased risks relating to dependence
on a small number of customers. Any of the foregoing results of industry consolidation could
adversely affect our business.
Our customers face numerous competitive challenges, such as decreasing demand from their customers,
rapid technological change and short life cycles for their products, which may materially adversely
affect their business, and also ours.
Factors affecting the industries that utilize electronics components in general, and our
customers specifically, could seriously harm our customers and, as a result, us. These factors
include:
|
|
|
recessionary periods in our customers markets; |
|
|
|
|
the inability of our customers to adapt to rapidly changing technology and evolving
industry standards, which contributes to short product life cycles; |
|
|
|
|
the inability of our customers to develop and market their products, some of which
are new and untested; |
|
|
|
|
the potential that our customers products become obsolete; |
|
|
|
|
the failure of our customers products to gain widespread commercial
acceptance; |
|
|
|
|
increased competition among our customers and their respective competitors which
may result in a loss of business, or a reduction in pricing power, for our customers; and |
|
|
|
|
new product offerings by our customers competitors may prove to be more successful
than our customers product offerings. |
47
At times our customers have been, and may be in the future, unsuccessful in addressing these
competitive challenges, or any others that they may face, and their business has been, and may be
in the future, materially adversely affected. As a result, the demand for our services has at times
declined and may decline in the future. Even if our customers are successful in responding to these
challenges, their responses may have consequences which affect our business relationships with our
customers (and possibly our results of operations) by altering our production cycles and inventory
management.
The success of our business is dependent on both our ability to independently keep pace with
technological changes and competitive conditions in our industry, and also our ability to
effectively adapt our services in response to our customers keeping pace with technological changes
and competitive conditions in their respective industries.
If we are unable to offer technologically advanced, cost effective, quick response
manufacturing services, demand for our services will decline. In addition, if we are unable to
offer services in response to our customers changing requirements, then demand for our services
will also decline. A substantial portion of our net revenue is derived from our offering of
complete service solutions for our customers. For example, if we fail to maintain high-quality
design and engineering services, our net revenue may significantly decline.
Most of our customers do not commit to long-term production schedules, which makes it difficult for
us to schedule production and capital expenditures, and to maximize the efficiency of our
manufacturing capacity.
The volume and timing of sales to our customers may vary due to:
|
|
|
variation in demand for our customers products; |
|
|
|
|
our customers attempts to manage their inventory; |
|
|
|
|
electronic design changes; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our customers manufacturing strategy; and |
|
|
|
|
acquisitions of or consolidations among customers. |
Due in part to these factors, most of our customers do not commit to firm production schedules
for more than one quarter. Our inability to forecast the level of customer orders with certainty
makes it difficult to schedule production and maximize utilization of manufacturing capacity. In
the past, we have been required to increase staffing and other expenses in order to meet the
anticipated demand of our customers. Anticipated orders from many of our customers have, in the
past, failed to materialize or delivery schedules have been deferred as a result of changes in our
customers business needs, thereby adversely affecting our results of operations. On other
occasions, our customers have required rapid increases in production, which have placed an
excessive burden on our resources. Such customer order fluctuations and deferrals have had a
material adverse effect on us in the past, including the most recent several fiscal quarters, and
we may experience such effects in the future. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
In addition to our difficulty in forecasting customer orders, we sometimes experience
difficulty forecasting the timing of our receipt of revenue and earnings following commencement of
manufacturing an additional product for new or existing customers. The necessary process to begin
this commencement of manufacturing can take from several months to more than a year before
production begins. Delays in the completion of this process can delay the timing of our sales and
related earnings. In addition, because we make capital expenditures during this ramping process
and do not typically recognize revenue until after we produce and ship the customers products, any
delays or unanticipated costs in the ramping process may have a significant adverse effect on our
cash flows and our results of operations.
Our customers may cancel their orders, change production quantities, delay production or change
their sourcing strategy.
Our industry must provide increasingly rapid product turnaround for its customers. We
generally do not obtain firm, long-term purchase commitments from our customers and we continue to
experience reduced lead-times in customer orders. Customers have previously canceled their orders,
changed production quantities, delayed production and changed their sourcing strategy for a number
of reasons, and may do one or more of these in the future. Such changes, delays and cancellations
have led to, and may lead in the future to a decline in our production and our possession of excess
or obsolete inventory which we may not be able to sell to the customer or a third party. This has
resulted in, and could result in future additional, write downs of inventories that have become
obsolete or exceed anticipated demand or net realizable value.
The success of our customers products in the market affects our business. Cancellations,
reductions, delays or changes in sourcing strategy by a significant customer or by a group of
customers have negatively impacted, and could further negatively impact in the future, our
operating results by reducing the number of products that we sell, delaying the payment to us for
inventory that we purchased and reducing the use of our manufacturing facilities which have
associated fixed costs not dependent on our level of revenue.
48
In addition, we make significant decisions, including determining the levels of business that
we will seek and accept, production schedules, component procurement commitments, personnel needs
and other resource requirements, based on our estimate of customer requirements. The following
factors, among others, reduce our ability to accurately estimate future customer requirements: the
short-term nature of our customers commitments; their uncertainty about, among other things,
future economic conditions and other events such as the current developing situation in Japan (as a
result of the recent earthquake and tsunami); and the possibility of rapid changes in demand for
their products. In addition, uncertainty about future economic conditions makes it difficult to
forecast operating results and make production planning decisions about future periods.
On occasion, customers may require rapid increases in production, which can stress our
resources and reduce operating margins. In addition, because many of our costs and operating
expenses are relatively fixed, a reduction in customer demand can harm our gross profits and
operating results.
We depend on a limited number of suppliers for components that are critical to our manufacturing
processes. A shortage of these components or an increase in their price could interrupt our
operations and reduce our profits, increase our inventory carrying costs, increase our risk of
exposure to inventory obsolescence and cause us to purchase components of a lesser quality.
Most of our significant long-term customer contracts permit quarterly or other periodic
adjustments to pricing based on decreases and increases in component prices and other factors;
however, we typically bear the risk of component price increases that occur between any such
re-pricings or, if such re-pricing is not permitted, during the balance of the term of the
particular customer contract. Accordingly, certain component price increases could adversely affect
our gross profit margins. Almost all of the products we manufacture require one or more components
that are only available from a single source. Some of these components are allocated from time to
time in response to supply shortages. In some cases, supply shortages will substantially curtail
production of all assemblies using a particular component. A supply shortage can also increase our
cost of goods sold, as a result of our having to pay higher prices for components in limited
supply, and cause us to have to redesign or reconfigure products to accommodate a substitute
component. In addition, at various times industry-wide shortages of electronic components have
occurred, particularly of semiconductor, relay and capacitor products. We believe these past
shortages were due to increased economic activity following recessionary conditions. We are
currently evaluating whether the recent earthquake and tsunami in Japan will result in component
shortages. In the past, such circumstances have produced insignificant levels of short-term
interruption of our operations, but could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations in the future. Our production of a customers product could be negatively impacted by
any quality or reliability issues with any of our component suppliers. The financial condition of
our suppliers could affect their ability to supply us with components which could have a material
adverse effect on our operations.
In addition, if a component shortage is threatened or we anticipate one, we may purchase such
component early to avoid a delay or interruption in our operations. A possible result of such an
early purchase is that we may incur additional inventory carrying costs, for which we may not be
compensated, and have a heightened risk of exposure to inventory obsolescence, the cost of which
may not be recoverable from our customers. Such costs would adversely affect our gross profit and
net income. A component shortage may also require us to look to second tier vendors or to procure
components through brokers with whom we are not familiar. These components may be of lesser quality
than those weve historically purchased and could cause us to incur costs to bring such components
up to our typical quality levels or to replace defective ones. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Business Components Procurement
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010.
Introducing programs requiring implementation of new competencies, including new process technology
within our mechanical operations, could affect our operations and financial results.
The introduction of programs requiring implementation of new competencies, including new
process technology within our mechanical operations, presents challenges in addition to
opportunities. Deployment of such programs may require us to invest significant resources and
capital in facilities, equipment and/or personnel. We may not meet our customers expectations or
otherwise execute properly or in a cost-efficient manner, which could damage our customer
relationships and result in remedial costs or the loss of our invested capital and anticipated
revenues and profits. In addition, there are risks of market acceptance and product performance
that could result in less demand than anticipated and our having excess capacity. The failure to
ensure that our agreed terms appropriately reflect the anticipated costs, risks, and rewards of
such an opportunity could adversely affect our profitability. If we do not meet one or more of
these challenges, our operations and financial results could be adversely affected.
Customer relationships with emerging companies may present more risks than with established
companies.
Customer relationships with emerging companies present special risks because such companies do
not have an extensive product history. As a result, there is less demonstration of market
acceptance of their products making it harder for us to anticipate needs and requirements than with
established customers. In addition, due to the current economic environment, additional funding for
49
such companies may be more difficult to obtain and these customer relationships may not
continue or materialize to the extent we planned or we previously experienced. This tightening of
financing for start-up customers, together with many start-up customers lack of prior operations
and unproven product markets increase our credit risk, especially in trade accounts receivable and
inventories. Although we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and adjust our
allowance for doubtful accounts receivable for all customers, including start-up customers, based
on the information available, these allowances may not be adequate. This risk may exist for any new
emerging company customers in the future.
We compete with numerous other electronic manufacturing services and design providers and others,
including our current and potential customers who may decide to manufacture some or all of their
products internally.
Our business is highly competitive. We compete against numerous domestic and foreign
electronic manufacturing services and design providers, including Benchmark Electronics, Inc.,
Celestica, Inc., Flextronics International Ltd., Hon-Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., Plexus Corp.
and Sanmina-SCI Corporation. In addition, past consolidation in our industry has resulted in larger
and more geographically diverse competitors who have significant combined resources with which to
compete against us. Also, we may in the future encounter competition from other large electronic
manufacturers, and manufacturers that are focused solely on design and manufacturing services, that
are selling, or may begin to sell electronics manufacturing services. Most of our competitors have
international operations and significant financial resources and some have substantially greater
manufacturing, R&D and marketing resources than us. These competitors may:
|
|
|
respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies; |
|
|
|
|
have greater name recognition, critical mass and geographic market presence; |
|
|
|
|
be better able to take advantage of acquisition opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
adapt more quickly to changes in customer requirements; |
|
|
|
|
devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their services; |
|
|
|
|
be better positioned to compete on price for their services, as a result of any
combination of lower labor costs, lower components costs, lower facilities costs or lower
operating costs; and |
|
|
|
|
have excess capacity, and be better able to utilize such excess capacity which may
reduce the cost of their product or service. |
We also face competition from the manufacturing operations of our current and potential
customers, who are continually evaluating the merits of manufacturing products internally against
the advantages of outsourcing. Recently, some of our customers have moved a portion of their
manufacturing from us in order to more fully utilize their excess internal manufacturing capacity.
We may be operating at a cost disadvantage compared to competitors who have greater direct
buying power from component suppliers, distributors and raw material suppliers or who have lower
cost structures as a result of their geographic location or the services they provide or who are
willing to make sales or provide services at lower margins than us (including relationships where
our competitors are willing to accept a lower margin from certain of their customers for whom they
perform other higher margin business). As a result, competitors may procure a competitive advantage
and obtain business from our customers. Our manufacturing processes are generally not subject to
significant proprietary protection. In addition, companies with greater resources or a greater
market presence may enter our market or increase their competition with us. We also expect our
competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products or services, to reduce
the sales prices of their current products or services and to introduce new products or services
that may offer greater performance and improved pricing. Any of these developments could cause a
decline in our sales, loss of market acceptance of our products or services, compression of our
profits or loss of our market share.
The economies of the U.S., Europe and certain countries in Asia are, or have recently been, in a
recession.
There was an erosion of global consumer confidence amidst concerns over declining asset
values, inflation, volatility in energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of
credit, high unemployment, and the stability and solvency of financial institutions, financial
markets, businesses, and sovereign nations. These concerns slowed global economic growth and
resulted in recessions in many countries, including in the U.S., Europe and certain countries in
Asia. Even though we have seen signs of an overall economic recovery beginning to take place and
the National Bureau of Economic Research declared that the U.S. recession ended in June 2009, such
recovery may be weak and/or short-lived. Recessionary conditions may return. If any of these
potential negative, or less than positive, economic conditions occur, a number of negative effects
on our business could result, including customers or potential customers reducing or delaying
orders, increased pricing pressures, the insolvency of key suppliers, which could result in
production delays, the inability of customers to obtain credit, and the insolvency of one or more
customers. Thus, these economic conditions (1) could negatively impact our ability to (a) forecast
customer demand, (b) effectively manage inventory levels and (c) collect receivables; (2) could
increase our need for cash; and (3) have decreased our net revenue and profitability and negatively
impacted the value of certain of our properties and other assets. Depending on the length of time
that these conditions exist, they may cause future additional negative effects, including some of
those listed above.
50
The financial markets have recently experienced significant turmoil, which may adversely affect
financial arrangements we may need to enter into, refinance or repay.
The effects of the recent credit market turmoil could negatively impact the counterparties to
our forward exchange contracts and trade accounts receivable securitization and sale programs; our
lenders under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility; and our lenders under various foreign
subsidiary credit facilities. These potential negative impacts could potentially limit our ability
to borrow under these financing agreements, contracts, facilities and programs. In addition, if we
attempt to obtain future additional financing, such as renewing or refinancing our $300.0 million
asset-backed securitization program expiring on November 4, 2011, our $100.0 million foreign
asset-backed securitization program expiring on May 20, 2011 or our $200.0 million and $150.0
million uncommitted trade accounts receivable sale programs expiring on May 25, 2011 and August 24,
2011, respectively, the effects of the recent credit market turmoil could negatively impact our
ability to obtain such financing. Finally, the credit market turmoil has negatively impacted
certain of our customers and certain of their customers. These impacts could have several
consequences which could have a negative effect on our results of operations, including one or more
of the following: a negative impact on our liquidity; a decrease in demand for our services; a
decrease in demand for our customers products; and bad debt charges or inventory write-offs.
Our business could be adversely affected by any delays, or increased costs, resulting from issues
that our common carriers are dealing with in transporting our materials, our products, or both.
We rely on a variety of common carriers to transport our materials from our suppliers to us,
and to transport our products from us to our customers. Problems suffered by any of these common
carriers, whether due to a natural disaster, labor problem, increased energy prices or some other
issue, could result in shipping delays, increased costs, or some other supply chain disruption, and
could therefore have a material adverse effect on our operations.
We derive a majority of our revenue from our international operations, which may be subject to a
number of risks and often require more management time and expense to achieve profitability than
our domestic operations.
We derived 84.9% and 85.7% of net revenue from international operations for the three months
and six months ended February 28, 2011, respectively, compared to 83.0% and 84.6% for the three
months and six months ended February 28, 2010, respectively. We currently expect our foreign source
revenue to slightly increase as compared to current levels over the course of the next 12 months.
At February 28, 2011, we operate outside the U.S. in Vienna, Austria; Hasselt, Belgium; Belo
Horizonte, Manaus and Sorocaba, Brazil; Beijing, Huangpu, Nanjing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Suzhou,
Tianjin, Wuxi and Yantai, China; Coventry, England; Brest, Gallargues, France; Jena, Germany;
Szombathely and Tiszaujvaros, Hungary; Pune, Mumbai and Ranjangaon, India; Dublin, Ireland;
Bergamo, Cassina de Pecchi and Marcianise Italy; Gotemba, Hachiouji and Tokyo, Japan; Penang,
Malaysia; Chihuahua, Guadalajara, Nogales and Reynosa, Mexico; Amsterdam, Eindhoven and Venray, The
Netherlands; Bydgoszcz and Kwidzyn, Poland; Tver, Russia; Ayr and Livingston, Scotland; Alexandra,
Tampines and Toa Payoh, Singapore; Hsinchu, Taichung and Taipei, Taiwan; Ankara, Turkey; Uzhgorod,
Ukraine and Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. We continually consider additional opportunities to make
foreign acquisitions and construct and open new foreign facilities. Our international operations
are, have been and may be subject to a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations; |
|
|
|
|
less flexible employee relationships which can be difficult and expensive to
terminate; |
|
|
|
|
labor unrest and dissatisfaction, including increased scrutiny of the labor
practices (including but not limited to working conditions, compliance with employment
and labor laws and compensation) of us and others in our industry by the media and other
third parties, which may result in further scrutiny and allegations of violations, more
stringent and burdensome labor laws and regulations, higher labor costs, and/or loss of
revenues if our customers become dissatisfied with our labor practices and diminish or
terminate their relationship with us; |
|
|
|
|
political and economic instability (including acts of terrorism, widespread
criminal activities and outbreaks of war); |
|
|
|
|
inadequate infrastructure for our operations (e.g., lack of adequate power, water,
transportation and raw materials); |
|
|
|
|
health concerns and related government actions; |
|
|
|
|
coordinating our communications and logistics across geographic distances and
multiple time zones; |
|
|
|
|
risk of governmental expropriation of our property; |
|
|
|
|
less favorable, or relatively undefined, intellectual property laws; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements and laws or government or judicial
interpretations of such regulatory requirements and laws; |
|
|
|
|
longer customer payment cycles and difficulty collecting trade accounts receivable; |
51
|
|
|
domestic and foreign export control laws, including the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations and the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), regulation by the
United States Department of Commerces Bureau of Industry and Security under the EAR, as
well as additional export duties, import controls and trade barriers (including quotas); |
|
|
|
|
adverse trade policies, and adverse changes to any of the policies of either the
U.S. or any of the foreign jurisdictions in which we operate; |
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in tax rates; |
|
|
|
|
adverse changes to the manner in which the U.S. taxes U.S.-based multinational
companies or interprets its tax laws; |
|
|
|
|
legal or political constraints on our ability to maintain or increase prices; |
|
|
|
|
governmental restrictions on the transfer of funds to us from our operations
outside the U.S.; |
|
|
|
|
burdens of complying with a wide variety of labor practices and foreign laws,
including those relating to export and import duties, environmental policies and privacy
issues; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which could affect local payroll and other
expenses; |
|
|
|
|
inability to utilize net operating losses incurred by our foreign operations
against future income in the same jurisdiction; and |
|
|
|
|
economies that are emerging or developing , that may be subject to greater
currency volatility, negative growth, high inflation, limited availability of foreign
exchange and other risks. |
These factors may harm our results of operations, and any measures that we may implement
to reduce the effect of volatile currencies and other risks of our international operations may not
be effective. In our experience, entry into new international markets requires considerable
management time as well as start-up expenses for market development, hiring and establishing
facilities before any significant revenue is generated. As a result, initial operations in a new
market may operate at low margins or may be unprofitable. See Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Another significant legal risk resulting from our international operations is compliance with
the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). In many foreign countries, particularly in those
with developing economies, it may be a local custom that businesses operating in such countries
engage in business practices that are prohibited by the FCPA or other U.S. laws and regulations.
Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to cause compliance with the FCPA and
similar laws, there can be no assurance that all of our employees, and agents, as well as those
companies to which we outsource certain of our business operations, will not take actions in
violation of our policies. Any such violation, even if prohibited by our policies, could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
If we do not manage our growth effectively, our profitability could decline.
Areas of our business at times experience periods of rapid growth which can place considerable
additional demands upon our management team and our operational, financial and management
information systems. Our ability to manage growth effectively requires us to continue to implement
and improve these systems; avoid cost overruns; maintain customer, supplier and other favorable
business relationships during possible transition periods; continue to develop the management
skills of our managers and supervisors; and continue to train, motivate and manage our employees.
Our failure to effectively manage growth could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
We have on occasion not achieved, and may not in the future achieve, expected profitability from
our acquisitions.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully integrate the operations and
management of our recent acquisitions. Similarly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to (1)
identify future strategic acquisitions, (2) consummate these potential acquisitions on favorable
terms, if at all, or (3) if consummated, successfully integrate the operations and management of
future acquisitions. Acquisitions involve significant risks, which could have a material adverse
effect on us (some of which recently came to fruition in our recent acquisition of F-I Holding
Company and the Competence Sites), including:
|
|
|
Financial risks, such as (1) the payment of a purchase price that exceeds the
future value that we may realize from the acquired operations and businesses; (2) an
increase in our expenses and working capital requirements, which could reduce our return
on invested capital; (3) potential known and unknown liabilities of the acquired
businesses; (4) costs associated with integrating acquired operations and businesses; (5)
the dilutive effect of the issuance of any additional equity securities we issue as
consideration for, or to finance, the acquisition; (6) the incurrence of additional debt;
(7) the financial impact of incorrectly valuing goodwill and other intangible assets
involved in any acquisitions, potential future impairment write-downs of goodwill and
indefinite life intangibles and the amortization of other intangible assets; (8) possible
adverse tax and accounting effects; and (9) the risk that we spend substantial amounts
purchasing these |
52
|
|
|
manufacturing facilities and assume significant contractual and other obligations with no
guaranteed levels of revenue or that we may have to close or sell acquired facilities at
our cost, which may include substantial employee severance costs and asset write-offs,
which have resulted, and may result, in our incurring significant losses. |
|
|
|
|
Operating risks, such as (1) the diversion of managements attention to the
assimilation of the acquired businesses; (2) the risk that the acquired businesses will
fail to maintain the quality of services that we have historically provided; (3) the need
to implement financial and other systems and add management resources; (4) the need to
maintain customer, supplier or other favorable business relationships of acquired
operations and restructure or terminate unfavorable relationships; (5) the potential for
deficiencies in internal controls of the acquired operations; (6) we may not be able to
attract and retain the employees necessary to support the acquired businesses; (7)
unforeseen difficulties (including any unanticipated liabilities) in the acquired
operations; and (8) the impact on us of any unionized work force we may acquire or any
labor disruptions that might occur. |
Most of our acquisitions involve operations outside of the U.S. which are subject to various
risks including those described in Risk Factors We derive a majority of our revenue from our
international operations, which may be subject to a number of risks and often require more
management time and expense to achieve profitability than our domestic operations.
We have acquired and may continue to pursue the acquisition of manufacturing and supply chain
management operations from our customers (or potential customers). In these acquisitions, the
divesting company will typically enter into a supply arrangement with the acquirer. Therefore, our
competitors often also pursue these acquisitions. In addition, certain divesting companies may
choose not to offer to sell their operations to us because of our current supply arrangements with
other companies or may require terms and conditions that may impact our profitability. If we are
unable to attract and consummate some of these acquisition opportunities at favorable terms, our
growth and profitability could be adversely impacted.
In addition to those risks listed above, arrangements entered into with these divesting
companies typically involve certain other risks, including the following:
|
|
|
the integration into our business of the acquired assets and facilities may be
time-consuming and costly; |
|
|
|
|
we, rather than the divesting company, may bear the risk of excess capacity; |
|
|
|
|
we may not achieve anticipated cost reductions and efficiencies; |
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to meet the expectations of the divesting company as to volume,
product quality, timeliness, pricing requirements and cost reductions; and |
|
|
|
|
if demand for the divesting companys products declines, it may reduce their volume
of purchases and we may not be able to sufficiently reduce the expenses of operating the
facility we acquired from them or use such facility to provide services to other
customers. |
In addition, when acquiring manufacturing operations, we may receive limited commitments to
firm production schedules. Accordingly, in these circumstances, we may spend substantial amounts
purchasing these manufacturing facilities and assume significant contractual and other obligations
with no or insufficient guaranteed levels of revenue. We may also not achieve expected
profitability from these arrangements. As a result of these and other risks, these outsourcing
opportunities may not be profitable.
We have expanded the primary scope of our acquisitions strategy beyond acquiring the
manufacturing assets of our customers and potential customers to include manufacturing service
providers with business plans similar to ours and companies with certain key technologies and
capabilities that complement and support our other current business activities. The amount and
scope of the risks associated with acquisitions of this type extend beyond those that we have
traditionally faced in making acquisitions. These extended risks include greater uncertainties in
the financial benefits and potential liabilities associated with this expanded base of
acquisitions.
We face risks arising from the restructuring of our operations.
Over the past few years, we have undertaken initiatives to restructure our business operations
with the intention of improving utilization and realizing cost savings in the future. These
initiatives have included changing the number and location of our production facilities, largely to
align our capacity and infrastructure with current and anticipated customer demand. This alignment
includes transferring programs from higher cost geographies to lower cost geographies. The process
of restructuring entails, among other activities, moving production between facilities, closing
facilities, reducing the level of staff, realigning our business processes and reorganizing our
management.
We continuously evaluate our operations and cost structure relative to general economic
conditions, market demands, cost competitiveness and our geographic footprint as it relates to our
customers production requirements. As a result of this ongoing evaluation, we initiated the 2006
Restructuring Plan and the 2009 Restructuring Plan. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Results of Operations Restructuring and
Impairment Charges for further details. If we incur unexpected restructuring charges related to
the 2006 Restructuring Plan, the 2009 Restructuring Plan, or both, or in
53
connection with any potential future restructuring program, our financial condition and
results of operations may suffer. We expect that in the future we may continue to transfer certain
of our operations to lower cost geographies, which may require us to take additional restructuring
charges. We also may decide to transfer certain operations to other geographies based on changes in
our customers requirements, the tax rates in the jurisdictions in which we operate or other
factors. Restructurings present significant potential risks of events occurring that could
adversely affect us, including a decrease in employee morale, delays encountered in finalizing the
scope of, and implementing, the restructurings (including extensive consultations concerning
potential workforce reductions, particularly in locations outside of the U.S.), the failure to
achieve targeted cost savings and the failure to meet operational targets and customer requirements
due to the loss of employees and any work stoppages that might occur. These risks are further
complicated by our extensive international operations, which subject us to different legal and
regulatory requirements that govern the extent and speed, of our ability to reduce our
manufacturing capacity and workforce. In addition, the current global economic conditions may
change how governments regulate restructuring as the recent global recession has impacted local
economies. Finally, we may have to obtain agreements from our affected customers for the
re-location of our facilities in certain instances. Obtaining these agreements, along with the
volatility in our customers demand, can further delay restructuring activities.
We may not be able to maintain our engineering, technological and manufacturing process expertise.
The markets for our manufacturing and engineering services are characterized by rapidly
changing technology and evolving process development. The continued success of our business will
depend upon our ability to:
|
|
|
hire, retain and expand our qualified engineering and technical personnel; |
|
|
|
|
maintain technological leadership; |
|
|
|
|
develop and market manufacturing services that meet changing customer needs; and |
|
|
|
|
successfully anticipate or respond to technological changes in manufacturing
processes on a cost-effective and timely basis. |
Although we believe that our operations use the assembly and testing technologies, equipment
and processes that are currently required by our customers, we cannot be certain that we will
develop the capabilities required by our customers in the future. The emergence of new technology,
industry standards or customer requirements may render our equipment, inventory or processes
obsolete or noncompetitive. In addition, we may have to acquire new assembly and testing
technologies and equipment to remain competitive. The acquisition and implementation of new
technologies and equipment may require significant expense or capital investment, which could
reduce our operating margins and our operating results. In facilities that we establish or acquire,
we may not be able to maintain our engineering, technological and manufacturing process expertise.
Our failure to anticipate and adapt to our customers changing technological needs and requirements
or to hire and retain a sufficient number of engineers and maintain our engineering, technological
and manufacturing expertise, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
If our manufacturing processes and services do not comply with applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements, or if we manufacture products containing design or manufacturing defects, demand for
our services may decline and we may be subject to liability claims.
We manufacture and design products to our customers specifications, and, in some cases, our
manufacturing processes and facilities may need to comply with applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements. For example, medical devices that we manufacture or design, as well as the facilities
and manufacturing processes that we use to produce them, are regulated by the Food and Drug
Administration and non-U.S. counterparts of this agency. Similarly, items we manufacture for
customers in the defense and aerospace industries, as well as the processes we use to produce them,
are regulated by the Department of Defense and the Federal Aviation Authority. In addition, our
customers products and the manufacturing processes that we use to produce them often are highly
complex. As a result, products that we manufacture may at times contain manufacturing or design
defects, and our manufacturing processes may be subject to errors or not be in compliance with
applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. Defects in the products we manufacture or design,
whether caused by a design, manufacturing or component failure or error, or deficiencies in our
manufacturing processes, may result in delayed shipments to customers or reduced or canceled
customer orders. If these defects or deficiencies are significant, our business reputation may also
be damaged. The failure of the products that we manufacture or our manufacturing processes and
facilities to comply with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements may subject us to legal
fines or penalties and, in some cases, require us to shut down or incur considerable expense to
correct a manufacturing process or facility. In addition, these defects may result in liability
claims against us or expose us to liability to pay for the recall of a product. The magnitude of
such claims may increase as we expand our medical and aerospace and defense manufacturing services,
as defects in medical devices and aerospace and defense systems could seriously harm or kill users
of these products and others. Even if our customers are responsible for the defects, they may not,
or may not have resources to, assume responsibility for any costs or liabilities arising from these
defects, which could expose us to additional liability claims.
Our regular manufacturing processes and services may result in exposure to intellectual property
infringement and other claims.
54
Providing manufacturing services can expose us to potential claims that the product design or
manufacturing processes infringe third party intellectual property rights. Even though many of our
manufacturing services contracts generally require our customers to indemnify us for infringement
claims relating to their products, including associated product specifications and designs, a
particular customer may not, or may not have the resources to assume responsibility for such
claims. In addition, we may be responsible for claims that our manufacturing processes or
components used in manufacturing infringe third party intellectual property rights. Infringement
claims could subject us to significant liability for damages, and potentially injunctive action, or
hamper our normal operations such as by interfering with the availability of components and,
regardless of merits, could be time-consuming and expensive to resolve.
Our design services and turnkey solutions offerings may result in additional exposure to product
liability, intellectual property infringement and other claims, in addition to the business risk of
being unable to produce the revenues necessary to profit from these services.
We continue our efforts to offer certain design services, primarily those relating to products
that we manufacture for our customers, and we also continue to offer design services related to
collaborative design manufacturing. We also offer turnkey solutions for the design and manufacture
of end-user products and components as well as related services. Providing such products and
services can expose us to different or greater potential liabilities than those we face when
providing our regular manufacturing services, including an increase in exposure to potential
product liability claims resulting from injuries caused by defects in products we design, as well
as potential claims that products we design or process, or components we use, infringe third party
intellectual property rights. Such claims could subject us to significant liability for damages,
subject the infringing portion of our business to injunction and, regardless of their merits, could
be time-consuming and expensive to resolve. We also may have greater potential exposure from
warranty claims and from product recalls due to problems caused by product design. Costs associated
with possible product liability claims, intellectual property infringement claims and product
recalls could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. When providing
collaborative design manufacturing or turnkey solutions, we may not be guaranteed revenue needed to
recoup or profit from the investment in the resources necessary to design and develop products or
provide services. No revenue may be generated from these efforts, particularly if our customers do
not approve the designs in a timely manner or at all, or if they do not then purchase anticipated
levels of products. Furthermore, contracts may allow the customer to delay or cancel deliveries and
may not obligate the customer to any volume of purchases, or may provide for penalties or
cancellation of orders if we are late in delivering designs or products. We may also have the
responsibility to ensure that products we design or offer satisfy safety and regulatory standards
and to obtain any necessary certifications. Failure to timely obtain the necessary approvals or
certifications could prevent us from selling these products, which in turn could harm our sales,
profitability and reputation.
In our contracts with turnkey solutions customers, we generally provide them with a warranty
against defects in our designs. If a turnkey solutions product or component that we design is found
to be defective in its design, this may lead to increased warranty claims. Warranty claims may also
extend to defects caused by components or materials used in the products but which are provided to
us by our suppliers. Although we have product liability insurance coverage, it may not be
available on acceptable terms, in sufficient amounts, or at all. A successful product liability
claim in excess of our insurance coverage or any material claim for which insurance coverage was
denied or limited and for which indemnification was not available could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, even if the claim
relates to a defect caused by a supplier, we may not be able to get an adequate remedy from the
supplier.
The success of our turnkey solution activities depends in part on our ability to obtain, protect
and leverage intellectual property rights to our designs.
We strive to obtain and protect certain intellectual property rights to our turnkey solutions
designs. We believe that having a significant level of protected proprietary technology gives us a
competitive advantage in marketing our services. However, we cannot be certain that the measures
that we employ will result in protected intellectual property rights or will result in the
prevention of unauthorized use of our technology. If we are unable to obtain and protect
intellectual property rights embodied within our designs, this could reduce or eliminate the
competitive advantages of our proprietary technology, which would harm our business.
Intellectual property infringement claims against our customers, our suppliers or us could harm our
business.
Our turnkey solutions products and services and those of our customers may compete against the
products of other companies, many of whom may own the intellectual property rights underlying those
products. Such products and services may also infringe the intellectual property rights of third
parties that may hold key intellectual property rights in areas in which we operate but which such
third parties do not actively provide products or services. Patent clearance or licensing
activities, if any, may be inadequate to anticipate and avoid third party claims. As a result, in
addition to the risk that we could become subject to claims of intellectual property infringement,
our customers or suppliers could become subject to infringement claims. Additionally, customers for
our turnkey solutions, or collaborative designs in which we have significant technology
contributions, typically require that we indemnify them against the risk of intellectual property
infringement. If any claims are brought against us or against our customers for such infringement,
regardless of their merits, we could be required to expend significant resources in the defense or
settlement of such
55
claims, or in the defense or settlement of related indemnification claims from our customers.
In the event of a claim, we may be required to spend a significant amount of money to develop
non-infringing alternatives or obtain licenses. We may not be successful in developing such
alternatives or obtaining such a license on reasonable terms or at all. Our customers may be
required to or decide to discontinue products which are alleged to be infringing rather than face
continued costs of defending the infringement claims, and such discontinuance may result in a
significant decrease in our business.
We depend on our officers, managers and skilled personnel.
Our success depends to a large extent upon the continued services of our executive officers
and other skilled personnel. Generally our employees are not bound by employment or non-competition
agreements, and we cannot assure you that we will retain our executive officers and other key
employees. We could be seriously harmed by the loss of any of our executive officers. In order to
manage our growth, we will need to internally develop and recruit and retain additional skilled
management personnel and if we are not able to do so, our business and our ability to continue to
grow could be harmed.
Any delay in the implementation of our information systems could disrupt our operations and cause
unanticipated increases in our costs.
We have completed the installation of an Enterprise Resource Planning system in most of our
manufacturing sites, excluding certain of the sites we acquired in the Taiwan Green Point
Enterprises Co., Ltd. (Green Point) acquisition transaction, and in our corporate location. We
are in the process of installing this system in certain of our remaining facilities, including
additional Green Point sites, which will replace the current Manufacturing Resource Planning
system, and financial information systems. Any delay in the implementation of these information
systems could result in material adverse consequences, including disruption of operations, loss of
information and unanticipated increases in costs.
Compliance or the failure to comply with current and future environmental, product stewardship and
producer responsibility laws or regulations could cause us significant expense.
We are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign environmental, product
stewardship and producer responsibility laws and regulations, including those relating to the use,
storage, discharge and disposal of hazardous chemicals used during our manufacturing process, those
requiring design changes or conformity assessments or those relating to the recycling of products
we manufacture. If we fail to comply with any present and future regulations, we could become
subject to future liabilities, and we could face the suspension of production, or prohibitions on
sales of products we manufacture. In addition, such regulations could restrict our ability to
expand our facilities or could require us to acquire costly equipment, or to incur other
significant expenses, including expenses associated with the recall of any non-compliant product or
with changes in our procurement and inventory management activities.
Certain environmental laws impose liability for the costs of investigation, removal or
remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on an owner, occupier or operator of real estate, even
if such person or company was unaware of or not responsible for the presence of such substances.
Soil and groundwater contamination may have occurred at some of our facilities. From time to time
we investigate, remediate and monitor soil and groundwater contamination at certain of our
operating sites. In certain instances where contamination existed prior to our ownership or
occupation of a site, landlords or former owners have retained some contractual responsibility for
contamination and remediation. However, failure of such persons to perform those obligations could
result in us being required to remediate such contamination. As a result, we may incur clean-up
costs in such potential removal or remediation efforts. In other instances, we may be solely
responsible for clean-up costs associated with remediation efforts.
From time to time new regulations are enacted, or existing requirements are changed, and
it is difficult to anticipate how such regulations and changes will be implemented and enforced. We
continue to evaluate the necessary steps for compliance with regulations as they are enacted.
Over the last several years, we have become subject to certain legal requirements, principally
in Europe, regarding the use of certain hazardous substances in, and the collection, reuse and
recycling of waste from, certain products that use or generate electricity. Similar requirements
are being developed or imposed in other areas of the world where we manufacture or sell products,
including China and the U.S. We believe that we comply, and will be able to continue to comply,
with such emerging requirements. We may experience negative consequences from these emerging
requirements however, including, but not limited to, supply shortages or delays, increased raw
material and component costs, accelerated obsolescence of certain of our raw materials, components
and products and the need to modify or create new designs for our existing and future products.
Our failure to comply with any applicable regulatory requirements or with related contractual
obligations could result in our being directly or indirectly liable for costs (including product
recall and/or replacement costs), fines or penalties and third party claims, and could jeopardize
our ability to conduct business in the jurisdictions implementing them.
56
In addition, as global warming issues become more prevalent, the U.S. and foreign governments
are beginning to respond to these issues. This increasing governmental focus on global warming may
result in new environmental regulations that may negatively affect us, our suppliers and our
customers. This could cause us to incur additional direct costs in complying with any new
environmental regulations, as well as increased indirect costs resulting from our customers,
suppliers or both incurring additional compliance costs that get passed on to us. These costs may
adversely impact our operations and financial condition.
We and our customers are increasingly concerned with environmental issues, such as waste
management (including recycling) and climate change (including reducing carbon outputs). We expect
these concerns to grow and require increased investments of time and resources.
We are subject to the risk of increased taxes.
We base our tax position upon the anticipated nature and conduct of our business and upon our
understanding of the tax laws of the various countries in which we have assets or conduct
activities. Our tax position, however, is subject to review and possible challenge by taxing
authorities and to possible changes in law (including adverse changes to the manner in which the
U.S. taxes U.S. based multinational companies). We cannot determine in advance the extent to which
some jurisdictions may assess additional tax or interest and penalties on such additional taxes.
For example, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) completed its field examination of our tax
returns for the fiscal years 2003 through 2005 and issued a Revenue Agents Report (RAR) on April
30, 2010 proposing adjustments primarily related to the IRS contentions that (1) certain corporate
expenses relate to services provided to foreign affiliates and therefore must be charged to those
affiliates, and (2) valuable intangible property was transferred to certain foreign affiliates
without charge. If the IRS ultimately prevails in its positions, our income tax payment due for the
fiscal years 2003 through 2005 would be approximately an additional $69.3 million before
utilization of any tax attributes arising in periods subsequent to fiscal year 2005. In addition,
the IRS will likely make similar claims in future audits with respect to these types of
transactions (at this time, determination of the additional income tax due for these later years is
not practicable). Also, the IRS has proposed interest and penalties on us with respect to fiscal
years 2003 through 2005, and we anticipate the IRS may seek to impose interest and penalties in
subsequent years with respect to the same types of issues. We disagree with the proposed
adjustments and presently intend to vigorously contest this matter through applicable IRS and
judicial procedures, as appropriate. While we currently believe that the resolution of these issues
will not have a material effect on our financial position or liquidity, an unfavorable resolution,
particularly if the IRS successfully asserts similar claims for later years, could have a material
effect on our results of operations and financial condition (particularly in the quarter in which
any adjustment is recorded or any tax is due or paid). For further discussion related to our
income taxes, refer to Note 12 Income Taxes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Income Taxes and Note 4 Income Taxes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2010.
In addition, our effective tax rate may be increased by the generation of higher income in
countries with higher tax rates, or changes in local tax rates. For example, China enacted a
unified enterprise income tax law, effective January 1, 2008, which has resulted in a higher tax
rate on operations in China as the rate increase is phased in over several years.
Several countries in which we are located allow for tax incentives to attract and retain
business. We have obtained incentives where available and practicable. Our taxes could increase if
certain tax incentives are retracted (which in some cases could occur if we fail to satisfy the
conditions on which such incentives are based), or if they are not renewed upon expiration, or tax
rates applicable to us in such jurisdictions are otherwise increased. It is anticipated that tax
incentives with respect to certain operations will expire within the next year. However, due to the
possibility of changes in existing tax law and our operations, we are unable to predict how these
expirations will impact us in the future. In addition, acquisitions may cause our effective tax
rate to increase, depending on the jurisdictions in which the acquired operations are located.
Our credit rating may be downgraded.
Our credit is rated by credit rating agencies. Our 7.750% Senior Notes, our 8.250% Senior
Notes and our 5.625% Senior Notes are currently rated BBB- by Fitch Ratings (Fitch), Ba1 by
Moodys and BB+ by S&P, and are considered to be below investment grade debt by Moodys and S&P
and investment grade debt by Fitch. Any potential future negative change in our credit rating may
make it more expensive for us to raise additional capital in the future on terms that are
acceptable to us, if at all; negatively impact the price of our common stock; increase our interest
payments under existing debt agreements; and have other negative implications on our business, many
of which are beyond our control. In addition, as discussed in Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources, the interest
rate payable on the 8.250% Senior Notes and under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility is
subject to adjustment from time to time if our credit ratings change. Thus, any potential future
negative change in our credit rating may increase the interest rate payable on the 8.250% Senior
Notes, the Amended and Restated Credit Facility and certain of our other borrowings.
57
Our amount of debt could significantly increase in the future.
As of February 28, 2011, our debt obligations consisted of $400.0 million under our 8.250%
Senior Notes, $312.0 million under our 7.750% Senior Notes and $400.0 million under our 5.625%
Senior Notes. As of February 28, 2011, there was $137.5 million outstanding under various bank
loans to certain of our foreign subsidiaries and under various other debt obligations. Refer to
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity
and Capital Resources and Note 10 Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.
We have the ability to borrow up to $1.0 billion under the Amended and Restated Credit
Facility. In addition, the Amended and Restated Credit Facility contemplates a potential increase
of up to an additional $300.0 million, if we and the lenders later agree to such increase. We could
incur additional indebtedness in the future in the form of bank loans, notes or convertible
securities.
Should we desire to consummate significant additional acquisition opportunities, undertake
significant additional expansion activities or make substantial investments in our infrastructure,
our capital needs would increase and could possibly result in our need to increase available
borrowings under our revolving credit facilities or access public or private debt and equity
markets. There can be no assurance, however, that we would be successful in raising additional debt
or equity on terms that we would consider acceptable. An increase in the level of our indebtedness,
among other things, could:
|
|
|
make it difficult for us to obtain any necessary financing in the future for other
acquisitions, working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or other
purposes; |
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to changes in, our business; |
|
|
|
|
make us more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in our business; and |
|
|
|
|
impact certain financial covenants that we are subject to in connection with our
debt and securitization programs, including, among others, the maximum ratio of debt to
consolidated EBITDA (as defined in our debt agreements and securitization programs). |
There can be no assurance that we will be able to meet future debt service obligations.
We are subject to risks of currency fluctuations and related hedging operations.
More than an insignificant portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar. Changes in exchange rates among other currencies and the U.S. dollar will affect our
cost of sales, operating margins and net revenue. We cannot predict the impact of future exchange
rate fluctuations. We use financial instruments, primarily forward contracts, to economically hedge
U.S. dollar and other currency commitments arising from trade accounts receivable, trade accounts
payable, fixed purchase obligations and other foreign currency obligations. Based on our
calculations and current forecasts, we believe that our hedging activities enable us to largely
protect ourselves from future exchange rate fluctuations. If, however, these hedging activities are
not successful or if we change or reduce these hedging activities in the future, we may experience
significant unexpected expenses from fluctuations in exchange rates.
An adverse change in the interest rates for our borrowings could adversely affect our financial
condition.
We pay interest on outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and certain
other long term debt obligations at interest rates that fluctuate based upon changes in various
base interest rates. An adverse change in the base rates upon which our interest rates are
determined could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
We face certain risks in collecting our trade accounts receivable.
Most of our customer sales are paid for after the goods and services have been delivered. If
any of our customers has any liquidity issues (the risk of which could be relatively high, relative
to historical conditions, due to current economic conditions), then we could encounter delays or
defaults in payments owed to us which could have a significant adverse impact on our financial
condition and results of operations. For example, two of our customers each filed a petition in
fiscal year 2009 for reorganization under bankruptcy law. We have analyzed our financial exposure
resulting from both of these customers bankruptcy filings and as a result have recorded an
allowance for doubtful accounts based upon our anticipated exposure associated with these events.
Our allowance for doubtful trade accounts receivable was $7.6 million as of February 28, 2011
(which represented approximately 1% of our gross trade accounts receivable balance) and $13.9
million as of August 31, 2010 (which represented approximately 1% of our gross trade accounts
receivable balance).
Certain of our existing stockholders have significant control.
At February 28, 2011, our executive officers, directors and certain of their family members
collectively beneficially owned 11.2% of our outstanding common stock, of which William D. Morean,
our Chairman of the Board, beneficially owned 6.7%. As a
58
result, our executive officers, directors
and certain of their family members have significant influence over (1) the election of our Board
of Directors, (2) the approval or disapproval of any other matters requiring stockholder approval
and (3) the affairs and policies of Jabil.
Our stock price may be volatile.
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE). The market price of
our common stock has fluctuated substantially in the past and could fluctuate substantially in the
future, based on a variety of factors, including future announcements covering us or our key
customers or competitors, government regulations, litigation, changes in earnings estimates by
analysts, fluctuations in quarterly operating results, or general conditions in our industry and
the aerospace, automotive, computing, consumer, defense, industrial, instrumentation, medical,
networking, peripherals, solar, storage and telecommunications industries. Furthermore, stock
prices for many companies and high technology companies in particular, fluctuate widely for reasons
that may be unrelated to their operating results. Those fluctuations and general economic,
political and market conditions, such as recessions or international currency fluctuations and
demand for our services, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Provisions in our charter documents and state law may make it harder for others to obtain control
of us even though some shareholders might consider such a development to be favorable.
Our shareholder rights plan, provisions of our amended certificate of incorporation and the
Delaware Corporation Laws may delay, inhibit or prevent someone from gaining control of us through
a tender offer, business combination, proxy contest or some other method. These provisions may
adversely impact our shareholders because they may decrease the possibility of a transaction in
which our shareholders receive an amount of consideration in exchange for their shares that is at a
significant premium to the then current market price of our shares. These provisions include:
|
|
|
a poison pill shareholder rights plan; |
|
|
|
|
a restriction in our bylaws on the ability of shareholders to take action by less
than unanimous written consent; and |
|
|
|
|
a statutory restriction on business combinations with some types of interested
shareholders. |
Changes in the securities laws and regulations have increased, and may continue to increase, our
costs; and any future changes would likely increase our costs.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related rules promulgated by the SEC and the NYSE,
required changes in some of our corporate governance, securities disclosure and compliance
practices. Compliance with these rules has increased our legal and financial accounting costs for
several years following the announcement and effectiveness of these new rules. While these costs
are no longer increasing, they may in fact increase in the future. In addition, given the recent
turmoil in the securities and credit markets, as well as the global economy, many U.S. and
international governmental, regulatory and supervisory authorities including, but not limited to,
the SEC and the NYSE, have recently enacted additional changes in their laws, regulations and rules
(such as the recent Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act) and may be
contemplating additional changes. These changes, and any such future changes, may cause our legal
and financial accounting costs to increase.
Due to inherent limitations, there can be no assurance that our system of disclosure and internal
controls and procedures will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud, or in informing
management of all material information in a timely manner.
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure controls and
internal controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter
how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system reflects that
there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
company have been or will be detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that
judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur simply because of error or
mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.
If we receive other than an unqualified opinion on the adequacy of our internal control over
financial reporting as of August 31, 2011 or any future year-ends, investors could lose confidence
in the reliability of our financial statements, which could result in a decrease in the value of
your shares.
59
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, public companies are required to
include an annual report on internal control over financial reporting in their annual reports on
Form 10-K that contains an assessment by management of the effectiveness of the companys internal
control over financial reporting. Our former independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG
LLP, issued an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of August 31, 2010. While we continuously conduct a rigorous review of our internal
control over financial reporting in order to assure compliance with the Section 404 requirements,
if our independent registered public accounting firm interprets the Section 404 requirements and
the related rules and regulations differently from us or if our independent registered public
accounting firm is not satisfied with our internal control over financial reporting or with the
level at which it is documented, operated or reviewed, they may issue an adverse opinion. An
adverse opinion could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of
confidence in the reliability of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In addition, we have spent a significant amount of resources in complying with Section 404s
requirements. For the foreseeable future, we will likely continue to spend substantial amounts
complying with Section 404s requirements, as well as improving and enhancing our internal control
over financial reporting.
There are inherent uncertainties involved in estimates, judgments and assumptions used in the
preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (U.S. GAAP). Any changes in U.S. GAAP or in estimates, judgments and assumptions could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in the periodic reports we file with
the SEC are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in
accordance with U.S. GAAP involves making estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect reported
amounts of assets, liabilities and related reserves, revenues, expenses and income. Estimates,
judgments and assumptions are inherently subject to change in the future, and any such changes
could result in corresponding changes to the amounts of assets, liabilities and related reserves,
revenues, expenses and income. Any such changes could have a material adverse effect on our
financial position and results of operations. In addition, the principles of U.S. GAAP are subject
to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants, the SEC and various bodies formed to create appropriate accounting policies,
and interpret such policies. A change in those policies can have a significant effect on our
accounting methods. For example, although not yet currently required, the SEC could require us to
adopt the International Financial Reporting Standards in the next few years, which could have a
significant effect on certain of our accounting methods.
We are subject to risks associated with natural disasters and global events.
Our operations may be subject to natural disasters (such as the recent earthquake and tsunami
in Japan) or other business disruptions, which could seriously harm our results of operation and
increase our costs and expenses. We are susceptible to losses and interruptions caused by
hurricanes (including in Florida, where our headquarters are located), earthquakes, power
shortages, telecommunications failures, water shortages, tsunamis, floods, typhoons, fire, extreme
weather conditions, geopolitical events such as terrorist acts or widespread criminal activities
and other natural or manmade disasters. Our insurance coverage with respect to natural disasters is
limited and is subject to deductibles and coverage limits. Such coverage may not be adequate, or
may not continue to be available at commercially reasonable rates and terms.
Energy price increases may negatively impact our results of operations.
Certain of the components that we use in our manufacturing activities are petroleum-based. In
addition, we, along with our suppliers and customers, rely on various energy sources (including
oil) in our transportation activities. While significant uncertainty currently exists about the
future levels of energy prices, which have recently increased, a further significant increase is
possible. Increased energy prices could cause an increase to our raw material costs and
transportation costs. In addition, increased transportation costs of certain of our suppliers and
customers could be passed along to us. We may not be able to increase our product prices enough to
offset these increased costs. In addition, any increase in our product prices may reduce our future
customer orders and profitability.
Item 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table provides information relating to the Companys repurchase of common stock
for the second quarter of fiscal year 2011.
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Shares that May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
Yet Be |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Under the |
|
Period |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Program |
|
|
Program |
|
December 1, 2010 December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2011 January 31, 2011 |
|
|
4,429 |
|
|
$ |
20.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2011 February 28, 2011 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
$ |
16.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,453 |
|
|
$ |
20.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The number of shares reported above as purchased are attributable to shares surrendered to
us by employees in payment of the exercise price related to Option exercises or minimum tax
obligations related to vesting of restricted shares. |
Item 3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
Item 4: (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
Item 5: OTHER INFORMATION
None.
61
Item 6: EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
3.1(1)
|
|
|
|
The Registrants Certificate of Incorporation, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2(2)
|
|
|
|
The Registrants Bylaws, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1(3)
|
|
|
|
Form of Certificate for Shares of the Registrants Common Stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2(4)
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2001, between the Registrant and EquiServe Trust Company,
N.A., which includes the form of the Certificate of Designation as Exhibit A, form of the Rights
Certificate as Exhibit B, and the Summary of Rights as Exhibit C. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.5(5)
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated January 16, 2008 by the Registrant and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company,
N.A. (formerly known as The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.), as trustee. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.6(6)
|
|
|
|
Form of 8.250% Registered Senior Notes issued on July 18, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7(7)
|
|
|
|
Form of 7.750% Registered Senior Notes issued on August 11, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.8(7)
|
|
|
|
Officers Certificate of the Registrant pursuant to the Indenture, dated August 11, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
4. 9(8)
|
|
|
|
Form of 5.625% Registered Senior Notes issued on November 2, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.10(8)
|
|
|
|
Officers Certificate of the Registrant pursuant to the Indenture, dated November 2, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1(9)
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Senior Unsecured Five-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2010, among
the Registrant; the initial lenders named therein; Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent; JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent; and The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and Bank of America, N.A.,
as documentation agents. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification by the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS(10)
|
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH(10)
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL(10)
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB(10)
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE(10)
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF(10)
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 29, 2000. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the
Registrant on October 29, 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1 filed by the Registrant on March 17, 1993 (File No. 33-58974). |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Form 8-A (File No. 001-14063) filed October 19,
2001. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the
Registrant on January 17, 2008. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended August 31, 2008. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the
Registrant on August 12, 2009. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the
Registrant on November 2, 2010. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended November 30, 2010. |
62
|
|
|
(10) |
|
These interactive data files shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections. |
63
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jabil Circuit, Inc.
Registrant
|
|
Date: April 8, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ TIMOTHY L. MAIN
|
|
|
|
Timothy L. Main |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: April 8, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ FORBES I.J. ALEXANDER
|
|
|
|
Forbes I.J. Alexander |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
64
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
|
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by the President and Chief Executive Officer of Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification by the President and Chief Executive Officer of Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of Jabil Circuit, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document. |
65