UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

Commission file number 001-15749

ALLIANCE DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(972) 348-5100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of Class)

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes þ         No o

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes o         No þ

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes þ         No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K.    þ

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ         Accelerated filer o         Non-accelerated filer o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes o         No þ

     As of June 30, 2005, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, 83,175,616 shares of common stock were outstanding and the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on that date was approximately $2.8 billion (based upon the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2005 of $40.56 per share). Aggregate market value is estimated solely for the purposes of this report. This shall not be construed as an admission for the purposes of determining affiliate status.

     As of February 28, 2006, 80,478,288 shares of common stock were outstanding.

Documents Incorporated By Reference

     Certain information called for by Part III is incorporated by reference to certain sections of the Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of our stockholders which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2005.

ALLIANCE DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION

INDEX

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

      This Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference herein contain forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements may use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “predict,” “project” and similar expressions as they relate to us or our management. When we make forward-looking statements, we are basing them on our management’s beliefs and assumptions, using information currently available to us. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, these forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those discussed in the “Risk Factors” section in Item 1A of this Form 10-K and elsewhere in this Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K.

      If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what we projected. Any forward looking statements contained in this annual report or in the documents incorporated herein by reference reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, growth strategy and liquidity. We have no intention, and disclaim any obligation, to update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future results or otherwise.

PART I

Our Company

      We are a leading provider of transaction services, credit services and marketing services in North America. We partner with our clients to develop unique insight into consumer behavior. We use that insight to create and manage customized solutions that we believe change consumer behavior and enable our clients to build stronger, mutually-beneficial relationships with their customers. We focus on facilitating and managing interactions between our clients and their customers through multiple distribution channels including in-store, catalogs and on-line. Our credit and marketing services assist our clients in identifying and acquiring new customers, as well as in increasing the loyalty and profitability of their existing customers. We have a client base in excess of 450 companies, consisting mostly of specialty retailers, petroleum retailers, utilities, supermarkets and financial services companies. We generally have long-term relationships with our clients, with contracts typically ranging from three to five years in duration.

      We are the result of the 1996 merger of two entities acquired by Welsh Carson Anderson & Stowe: J.C. Penney’s transaction services business, BSI Business Services, Inc., and Limited Brands, Inc.’s credit card bank operation, World Financial Network National Bank. In June 2001, we concluded the initial public offering of our common stock, which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. During 2003, we completed two secondary public offerings whereby Limited Commerce Corp., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Limited Brands and was our second largest stockholder, sold all of our shares of common stock it beneficially owned.

      We continue to execute on our growth strategy through a combination of internal growth and acquisitions. In early 2005, we entered into long-term agreements to provide private label credit card services to Z Gallerie and to provide private label credit card and co-brand services to Hanover Direct. In April 2005, we signed an agreement with Blair Corporation to purchase Blair’s private label credit card portfolio and a ten-year agreement with Blair to provide a fully integrated private label credit card program. In April 2005, we expanded our existing commercial credit card relationship with Carter Lumber by signing a five-year agreement with Carter Lumber to provide an integrated commercial credit card and consumer private label credit card program. In May 2005, we signed a multi-year renewal with The Dress

Barn, Inc. and Maurices Incorporated to continue providing private label credit card services, and in July we entered into a multi-year agreement with Gander Mountain Company to provide a co-brand credit card program. In October 2005, we expanded our relationship with each of Spiegel Catalog and Newport News by entering into long-term agreements to provide co-brand credit card programs for both the Spiegel and Newport News brands. In November 2005, we extended our previous agreements with Limited Brands, one of our top-ten clients, to continue providing credit and programs across the following brands: Victoria’s Secret, The Limited, Express, Bath and Body Works and Henri Bendel.

      In May 2005, we signed a five-year extension with Hilton HHonors Worldwide, one of our top-fifteen clients, to continue to provide integrated relationship management services for the Hilton HHonors^® Guest Rewards Program. In July 2005, we expanded our relationship with Bank of America by signing a multi-year renewal to complete the construction of an enhanced consumer marketing database and to host and manage the system on behalf of Bank of America. In September 2005, we expanded our marketing capabilities with the acquisition of Bigfoot Interactive, Inc., now known as Epsilon Interactive, Inc., a leading full-service provider of strategic ROI-focused e-mail communications and marketing automation solutions.

      In 2005, we renewed the participation of several of the top-ten sponsors in our AIR MILES^® Reward Program in Canada. In July 2005, we signed multi-year renewals with the operating subsidiaries of Sobeys Inc. in Atlantic Canada and the Province of Quebec to continue as participating regional grocery sponsors. In October 2005, we signed a multi-year renewal with the Liquor Control Board of Ontario and a long-term renewal with Amex Bank of Canada, to continue to issue AIR MILES reward miles to Canadians holding its American Express AIR MILES Credit Cards. In December 2005, we signed a multi-year renewal with Canada Safeway Limited to continue as the Western Canada participating grocery sponsor in the AIR MILES Reward Program.

      In April 2005, we signed an agreement to provide project management and systems integration services to Cobb Energy, a large co-op electric utility. In May 2005, we acquired Atrana Solutions, Inc., a leading provider of point-of-sale technology solutions that gave us additional capabilities, product offerings and client relationships. In July 2005, we signed a long-term contract renewal with Pepco Energy Services, Inc. to continue providing customer information systems services and customer care solutions. In August 2005, we signed an agreement with Hampton Roads Sanitation District to provide consulting services and an agreement with Greenville Utilities Commission to provide customer care solutions. In November 2005, we signed a seven-year agreement with PNM Resources’ retail energy provider in Texas, First Choice Power, to provide a full-service customer care solution.

      Our corporate headquarters are located at 17655 Waterview Parkway, Dallas, Texas 75252, and our telephone number is 972-348-5100.

Our Market Opportunity and Growth Strategy

      Our services are applicable to the full spectrum of commerce opportunities involving companies that sell products and services to individual consumers. We are well positioned to benefit from trends favoring outsourcing and electronic transactions. Many companies lack the economies of scale and core competencies necessary to support their own transaction processing infrastructure and credit card and loyalty or database operations. Companies are also increasingly outsourcing the development and management of their marketing programs.

      Our growth strategy is to pursue initiatives to capitalize on our market position and core competencies. Key elements of our strategy are:

Products and Services

      Our products and services are centered around three core capabilities — Transaction Services, Credit Services and Marketing Services. We have traditionally marketed and sold our products and services on a stand-alone basis but increasingly market and sell them on an integrated basis. Our products and services and target markets are listed below. Financial information about our segments and geographic areas appears in Note 18 of our consolidated financial statements.

Transaction Services

      We facilitate and manage transactions between our clients and their customers through our scalable processing systems. Our largest clients within this segment include Limited Brands and its retail affiliates, representing approximately 13.6% of this segment’s 2005 revenue.

      Issuer Services. We assist clients in issuing private label credit cards with the retailers’ brand that can be used by customers at the clients’ store locations, catalogs or on-line. We also provide service and maintenance to our clients’ private label credit card programs and assist our clients in acquiring, retaining and managing valuable repeat customers. Our Transaction Services segment performs issuer services for our Credit Services segment in connection with that segment’s private label credit card programs. The inter-segment services accounted for 44.7% of Transaction Services revenue in 2005.

      We have developed a proprietary private label credit card system designed specifically for retailers with the flexibility to make changes to accommodate our clients’ specific needs. We have also built into the system marketing tools to assist our clients in increasing sales. We utilize our Quick Credit and On-Line Prescreen products to originate new private label credit card accounts. We believe that these products provide an effective marketing advantage over competing services.

      We use automated technology for bill preparation, printing and mailing. Commingling statements, presorting and bar coding allow us to take advantage of postal discounts. In addition, we also process customer payments using image processing technology to maximize efficiency. By doing so, we improve the funds availability for both our clients and for those private label credit card receivables that we own or securitize.

      Our customer care operations are influenced by our retail heritage. We focus our training programs in all areas on achieving the highest possible standards. We monitor our performance by conducting surveys with our clients and their customers. Our call centers are equipped to handle phone, mail, fax and on-line inquiries. We also provide collection activities on delinquent accounts to support our retail private label credit card programs.

      Utility Services. We believe that we are one of the largest independent service providers of customer information systems for utilities in North America. We provide a comprehensive single source business solution for customer care and billing solutions. We have solutions for the regulated, de-regulated and municipal marketplace. These solutions provide not only hosting of the customer information system, but also customer care, statement generation and payment processing, focusing on successful acquisition, value enhancement and retention of our clients’ customers.

      In both a regulated and de-regulated environment, providers will need more sophisticated and complex billing and customer information systems to effectively compete in the marketplace. We believe that our ability to integrate transaction and marketing services effectively provides a competitive advantage for us.

      Merchant Services. We are a provider of transaction processing services that based on transactions processed reflects an emphasis on the U.S. petroleum retail industry. We have built a network that enables us to process virtually all electronic payment types including credit card, debit card, prepaid card, electronic benefits and check transactions.

Credit Services

      Through our Credit Services segment we are able to finance and operate private label credit card programs more effectively than a typical retailer can operate a stand alone program. We are able to use our expertise in loyalty and one-to-one marketing to help our retail partners develop deeper relationships with their customers and our cardholders. In addition, we are able to fund receivables through our securitization program to achieve lower borrowing costs while having the infrastructure to support and leverage a variety of portfolio types and a large number of account holders. Through our subsidiaries, World Financial Network National Bank and World Financial Capital Bank, we underwrite the accounts

and fund purchases for over 80 private label credit card and commercial credit clients, representing almost 100 million cardholders and over $3.7 billion of managed receivables as of December 31, 2005. Our clients are predominately specialty retailers, and the largest within this segment include Limited Brands and its retail affiliates, representing 30.5% of this segment’s 2005 revenue, and Redcats, representing 13.6% of this segment’s 2005 revenue.

      We believe that an effective risk management process is important in both account underwriting and servicing. We use a risk analysis in establishing initial credit limits with cardholders. Because we process a large number of credit applications each year, we use automated proprietary scoring technology and verification procedures to process these applications. Our underwriting process involves the purchase of credit bureau information for each credit applicant. We continuously validate, monitor and maintain the scorecards, and we use the resulting data to ensure optimal risk performance. These models help segment prospects into narrower ranges within each risk score provided by credit bureau services, allowing us to better evaluate individual credit risk and to tailor our risk-based pricing accordingly. We generally receive a merchant fee for processing sales transactions charged to a private label credit card program for which we provide receivables funding. Processing includes authorization and settlement of the funds to the retailer, net of our merchant fee.

      We utilize a securitization program as our primary funding vehicle for private label credit card receivables. Securitizations involve the packaging and selling of both current and future receivable balances of credit card accounts to a special purpose entity that then sells them to a master trust. Our Transaction Services segment retains rights to service the managed accounts. Our securitizations are treated as sales for accounting purposes and, accordingly, the receivable is removed from our balance sheet. We retain an ownership interest in the receivables, which is commonly referred to as a seller’s interest, and a residual interest in the trust, which is commonly referred to as an interest-only strip. The fair value of the interest-only strip is based on assumptions regarding future payments and credit losses and is subject to volatility that could materially affect our operating results. Both the amount and timing of estimated cash flows are dependent on the performance of the underlying credit card receivables, and actual cash flows may vary significantly from expectations. If payments from cardholders or defaults by cardholders exceed our estimates, we may be required to decrease the carrying value of the interest-only strips through a charge against earnings. Limited Brands and its retail affiliates and Redcats accounted for approximately 25.2% and 11.7%, respectively of the receivables in the trust portfolio as of December 31, 2005.

Marketing Services

      Our clients are focused on targeting, acquiring and retaining loyal and profitable customers. We create and manage marketing programs that result in securing more frequent and sustained customer purchasing. We utilize the information gathered through our loyalty and database marketing programs to help our clients design and implement effective marketing programs. Our largest service provided by this segment is coalition loyalty, which is branded as the AIR MILES Reward Program and which represents the substantial majority of this segment’s 2005 revenue. Our clients within this segment are financial services providers, supermarkets, petroleum retailers, specialty retailers and pharmaceutical companies. BMO Bank of Montreal, Canada Safeway, Shell Canada and Amex Bank of Canada were the four largest Marketing Services clients in 2005, and represented approximately 44.6% of our 2005 Marketing Services revenue. BMO Bank of Montreal represented approximately 24.6% of this segment’s 2005 revenue.

      Coalition Loyalty. We operate what we believe to be the largest coalition loyalty program in Canada. The AIR MILES Reward Program enables consumers to earn AIR MILES reward miles as they shop across a range of retailers and other sponsors participating in the AIR MILES Reward Program. The AIR MILES Reward Program has enabled sponsors to use this tool to increase their revenues by attracting new customers, retaining existing customers and increasing the amount spent by customers.

      We deal with three primary parties in connection with our AIR MILES Reward Program: sponsors, collectors and suppliers.

      A sponsor enters into an agreement with us to secure exclusive rights for its particular region and product or service category, to reward customers for changing their shopping behavior and to increase sales from collectors. Collectors can collect AIR MILES reward miles at over 12,000 retail and service locations operated by more than 100 brand name sponsors in every province across Canada, including BMO Bank of Montreal, Canada Safeway, Amex Bank of Canada, Shell Canada, A&P Canada and Sobeys.

      Members of the AIR MILES Reward Program, known as collectors, accumulate AIR MILES reward miles based on their purchasing behavior at sponsor locations. The AIR MILES Reward Program offers a reward structure that provides a quick and easy way for collectors to earn a broad selection of travel, entertainment and other lifestyle rewards by shopping at participating sponsors. Our active participants represent over two-thirds of all Canadian households. We have issued over seventeen billion AIR MILES reward miles since the program’s inception in 1992.

      We enter into supply agreements with suppliers of rewards to the program such as airlines, movie theaters and manufacturers of consumer electronics. We make more than 800 different reward opportunities available through over 300 suppliers.

      Marketing Services. Epsilon Data Management, Inc. and Epsilon Interactive, which were acquired by us during 2004 and 2005, respectively, are leaders in providing integrated direct marketing solutions that combine database marketing technology and analytics with a broad range of direct marketing services, including e-mail marketing campaigns. Epsilon leverages its deep technology, analytic and direct marketing capabilities to develop integrated marketing solutions for clients in a targeted group of industries including travel, financial services, pharmaceuticals, telecommunications, not-for-profit and insurance. Our integrated direct marketing services include the following:

      We provide design and management of integrated marketing databases; customer and prospect data integration and hygiene; campaign management and marketing application integration; loyalty management; web design and development; and e-mail marketing.

      We provide behavior-based, demographic and attitudinal segmentation; acquisition, attrition, cross-sell and upsell, retention, loyalty and value predictive modeling; and program evaluation, testing and measurement.

      We provide direct marketing program design, development and management; campaign design and execution; value proposition and business case development; concept development and creative media consulting; print, imaging and personalization services; data processing services; fulfillment services; and mailing services.

      We provide strategic, focused e-mail communication solutions and marketing technologies. Our end-to-end suite of industry specific products and services includes scalable e-mail campaign technology, delivery optimization, marketing automation tools, turnkey integration solutions, strategic consulting and creative expertise to produce e-mail programs that generate measurable results throughout the customer lifecycle.

Safeguards to Our Business; Disaster and Contingency Planning

      We have a number of safeguards to protect our company from the risks we face as a business. Given the significant amount of data that we manage, much of which is real-time data to support our clients’ commerce initiatives, we have established redundant capabilities within our data centers. We operate multiple data processing centers. In the event of a disaster we can restore our data centers’ systems at a third party-provided disaster recovery center for the majority of our clients’ data, and recover internally for the remaining critical systems. Our approach to disaster recovery is consistent with best practices in our industry and our clients’ needs.

Protection of Intellectual Property and Other Proprietary Rights

      We rely on a combination of copyright, trade secret and trademark laws, confidentiality procedures, contractual provisions and other similar measures to protect our proprietary information and technology used in each segment of our business. We currently have four patent applications with the U.S Patent and Trademark Office and one international application that has entered the national phase in two countries. We generally enter into confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, consultants and corporate partners, and generally control access to and distribution of our technology, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite the efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain the use of our products or technology that we consider proprietary and third parties may attempt to develop similar technology independently. We pursue registration and protection of our trademarks primarily in the United States and Canada, although we do have applications pending in Mexico, South America and Europe. Effective protection of intellectual property rights may be unavailable or limited in some countries. The laws of some countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as in the United States and Canada. We are the exclusive Canadian licensee of the AIR MILES family of trademarks pursuant to a license agreement with Air Miles International Trading B.V. We believe that the AIR MILES family of trademarks and our other trademarks are important for our branding and corporate identification and marketing of our services in each segment.

Competition

      The markets for our products and services are highly competitive. We compete with data processing companies, credit card issuers and marketing services companies, as well as with the in-house staffs of our current and potential clients.

      Transaction Services. We are a leading provider of transaction services. Our focus has been on industry segments characterized by companies with large customer bases, detail-rich data and high transaction volumes. Targeting these specific market sectors allows us to develop and deliver solutions that meet the needs of these sectors. This focus is consistent with our marketing strategy for all products and services. Additionally, we believe we effectively distinguish ourselves from other transaction processors by providing solutions that help our clients leverage investments they have made in payment systems by using these systems for electronic marketing programs. Competition in the area of utility services comes primarily from larger, more well-funded and well-established competitors and from companies developing in-house solutions and capabilities.

      Credit Services. Our credit services business competes primarily with financial institutions whose marketing focus has been on developing credit card programs with large revolving balances. These competitors further drive their businesses by cross selling their other financial products to their cardholders. Our focus has been on targeting retailers that understand the competitive advantage of developing loyal customers. Typically these retailers have customers that make more frequent and smaller transactions. This results in the effective capture of detail-rich data within our database marketing services, allowing us to mine and analyze this data to develop successful customer relationship management strategies for our clients. As an issuer of private label credit cards, we compete with other payment methods, primarily general purpose credit cards like Visa and MasterCard, which we also issue, and American Express, as well as cash, checks and debit cards.

      Marketing Services. As a provider of marketing services, we generally compete with advertising and other promotional and loyalty programs, both traditional and on-line, for a portion of a client’s total marketing budget. In addition, we compete against internally developed products and services created by our existing and potential clients. For each of our marketing services, we expect competition to intensify as more competitors enter our market. In addition, new competitors with our AIR MILES Reward Program may target our sponsors and collectors as well as draw rewards from our rewards suppliers. Our ability to generate significant revenue from clients and loyalty partners will depend on our ability to differentiate ourselves through the products and services we provide and the attractiveness of our loyalty and rewards programs to consumers. The continued attractiveness of our loyalty and rewards programs will depend in large part on our ability to remain affiliated with sponsors that are desirable to consumers and to offer rewards that are both attainable and attractive to consumers. Intensifying competition will make it more difficult for us to do this. For our database marketing services, our ability to continue to capture detailed transaction data on consumers is critical in providing effective customer relationship management strategies for our clients.

Regulation

      Federal and state laws and regulations extensively regulate the operations of our credit card services bank subsidiary, World Financial Network National Bank, as well as our industrial bank, World Financial Capital Bank. Many of these laws and regulations are intended to maintain the safety and soundness of World Financial Network National Bank and World Financial Capital Bank, and they impose significant restraints on them to which other non-regulated companies are not subject. Because World Financial Network National Bank is deemed a credit card bank and World Financial Capital Bank is an industrial bank within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act, we are not subject to regulation as a bank holding company. If we were subject to regulation as a bank holding company, we would be constrained in our operations to a limited number of activities that are closely related to banking or financial services in nature. Nevertheless, as a national bank, World Financial Network National Bank is still subject to overlapping supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; and, as an industrial bank, World Financial Capital Bank is still subject to overlapping supervision by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the State of Utah.

      World Financial Network National Bank and World Financial Capital Bank must maintain minimum amounts of regulatory capital. If World Financial Network National Bank or World Financial Capital Bank do not meet these capital requirements, their respective regulators have broad discretion to institute a number of corrective actions that could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s Order approving World Financial Capital Bank’s application for deposit insurance, World Financial Capital Bank must meet specific capital ratios and paid-in capital minimums, must maintain adequate allowances for loan losses, and must operate within its three-year business plan, among other restrictions. If World Financial Capital Bank fails to meet the terms of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations’ Order, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation may withdraw insurance coverage from World Financial Capital Bank and the State of Utah may withdraw its approval of World Financial Capital Bank. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulating framework for prompt corrective action, World Financial Network National Bank must meet specific guidelines that involve measures and ratios of its assets, liabilities, regulatory capital, interest rate exposure and certain off-balance sheet items under regulatory accounting standards, among other factors. Under the National Bank Act, if the capital stock of World Financial Network National Bank is impaired by losses or otherwise, we, as the sole shareholder, may be assessed the deficiency. To the extent necessary, if a deficiency in capital still exists, the FDIC may be appointed as a receiver to wind up World Financial Network National Bank’s affairs.

      Before World Financial Network National Bank can pay dividends to us, it must obtain prior regulatory approval if all dividends declared in any calendar year would exceed its net profits for that year plus its retained net profits for the preceding two calendar years, less any transfers to surplus. In addition,

World Financial Network National Bank may only pay dividends to the extent that retained net profits, including the portion transferred to surplus, exceed bad debts. Moreover, to pay any dividend, World Financial Network National Bank must maintain adequate capital above regulatory guidelines. Further, if a regulatory authority believes that World Financial Network National Bank is engaged in or is about to engage in an unsafe or unsound banking practice, which, depending on its financial condition, could include the payment of dividends, the authority may require, after notice and hearing, that World Financial Network National Bank cease and desist from the unsafe practice. Before World Financial Capital Bank can pay dividends to us, it must obtain prior written regulatory approval.

      As part of an acquisition in 2003 by World Financial Network National Bank, which required approval by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency required World Financial Network National Bank to enter into an operating agreement with it and a capital adequacy and liquidity maintenance agreement with us. The operating agreement requires World Financial Network National Bank to continue to operate in a manner consistent with its current practices, regulatory guidelines and applicable law, including those related to affiliate transactions, maintenance of capital and corporate governance. World Financial Network National Bank does not expect that the operating agreement will require any changes in World Financial Network National Bank’s current operations. The capital adequacy and liquidity maintenance agreement memorializes our current obligations to World Financial Network National Bank.

      We are limited under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act in the extent to which we can borrow or otherwise obtain credit from or engage in other “covered transactions” with World Financial Network National Bank or World Financial Capital Bank, which may have the effect of limiting the extent to which World Financial Network National Bank or World Financial Capital Bank can finance or otherwise supply funds to us. “Covered transactions” include loans or extensions of credit, purchases of or investments in securities, purchases of assets, including assets subject to an agreement to repurchase, acceptance of securities as collateral for a loan or extension of credit, or the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit. Although the applicable rules do not serve as an outright bar on engaging in “covered transactions,” they do require that we engage in covered transactions with World Financial Network National Bank or World Financial Capital Bank only on terms and under circumstances that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to World Financial Network National Bank or World Financial Capital Bank, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with nonaffiliated companies. Furthermore, with certain exceptions, each loan or extension of credit by World Financial Network National Bank or World Financial Capital Bank to us or our other affiliates must be secured by collateral with a market value ranging from 100% to 130% of the amount of the loan or extension of credit, depending on the type of collateral.

      We are required to monitor and report unusual or suspicious account activity as well as transactions involving amounts in excess of prescribed limits under the Bank Secrecy Act, IRS rules and other regulations. Congress, the IRS and the bank regulators have focused their attention on banks’ monitoring and reporting of suspicious activities. Additionally, Congress and the bank regulators have proposed, adopted or passed a number of new laws and regulations that may increase reporting obligations of banks.

      We are also subject to numerous laws and regulations that are intended to protect consumers, including state law, the Truth in Lending Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Fair Credit Reporting Act. These laws and regulations mandate various disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which we may interact with consumers. These and other laws also limit finance charges or other fees or charges earned in our activities. We conduct our operations in a manner that we believe excludes us from regulation as a consumer reporting agency under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. If we were deemed a consumer reporting agency, however, we would be subject to a number of additional complex regulatory requirements and restrictions.

      A number of privacy regulations have been implemented in the United States and Canada in recent years. These regulations place many new restrictions on our ability to collect and disseminate customer information.

      Under the Gramm Leach Bliley Act, we are required to maintain a comprehensive written information security program that includes administrative, technical and physical safeguards relating to customer information. We also were required to develop an initial privacy notice and we are required to provide annual privacy notices to customers that describe in general terms our information sharing practices. If we intend to share nonpublic personal information about customers with nonaffiliated third parties, we must provide our customers with a notice and a reasonable period of time for each customer to “opt out” of any such disclosure.

      In addition to the federal privacy laws with which we must comply, states also have adopted statutes, regulations or other measures governing the collection and distribution of personal information about customers. In some cases these state measures are preempted by federal law, but if not, we make efforts to monitor and comply with individual state privacy laws in the conduct of our business.

      We also have systems and processes to comply with the USA PATRIOT ACT of 2001, which is designed to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes.

      Canada has likewise enacted privacy legislation known as the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act. This act requires organizations to obtain a consumer’s consent to collect, use or disclose personal information. Under this act, which took effect on January 1, 2001, the nature of the required consent depends on the sensitivity of the personal information, and the act permits personal information to be used only for the purposes for which it was collected. Some provinces have enacted substantially similar privacy legislation. We believe we have taken appropriate steps with our AIR MILES Reward Program to comply with the law.

Employees

      As of December 31, 2005 we had approximately 8,000 employees in the United States and Canada. We believe our relations with our employees are good. We have no collective bargaining agreements with our employees.

Available Information

      We file or furnish annual, quarterly, current and special reports and proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document we file or furnish at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. Our SEC filings are also available to the public at the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov. Our web site is www.AllianceDataSystems.com. No information from this web site is incorporated by reference herein. You may also obtain copies of our annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and certain other information filed or furnished with the SEC, as well as amendments thereto, free of charge from our web site. These documents are posted to our web site as soon as reasonably practicable after we have filed or furnished these documents with the SEC. We post our audit committee, compensation committee, nominating and corporate governance committee, and executive committee charters, our corporate governance guidelines, and our code of ethics, code of ethics for Senior Financial Executives and Chief Executive Officer, and code of ethics for Board Members on our web site. These documents are available free of charge to any stockholder upon request.

      We submitted the certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, relating to our compliance with the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards, to the NYSE on June 8, 2005 with no qualification. In addition, we included the certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules, relating to the quality of our public disclosure, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2.

Risk Factors

Risks Related to General Business Operations

      We depend on a limited number of large clients for a significant portion of our consolidated revenue. Our 10 largest clients represented approximately 43.1% of our consolidated revenue during the year ended December 31, 2005, with Limited Brands and its retail affiliates representing approximately 17.7% of our 2005 consolidated revenue. Our contract with Limited Brands and its retail affiliates expires in 2012. A decrease in revenue from any of our significant clients for any reason, including a decrease in pricing or activity, or a decision to either utilize another service provider or to no longer outsource some or all of the services we provide, could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated revenue.

      Transaction Services. Our 10 largest clients in this segment represented approximately 48.7% of our Transaction Services revenue in 2005. Limited Brands and its retail affiliates were the largest Transaction Services client in 2005, representing approximately 13.6% of this segment’s 2005 revenue. Our contracts with Limited Brands and its retail affiliates expire in 2012.

      Credit Services. Our two largest clients in this segment represented approximately 44.1% of our Credit Services revenue in 2005. Limited Brands and its retail affiliates represented approximately 30.5%, and Redcats represented approximately 13.6% of our Credit Services revenue in 2005. Our contracts with Limited Brands and its retail affiliates expire in 2012, and our contract with Redcats expires in 2013.

      Marketing Services. Our 10 largest clients in this segment represented approximately 61.1% of our Marketing Services revenue in 2005. BMO Bank of Montreal, Canada Safeway, Shell Canada and Amex Bank of Canada were the four largest Marketing Services clients in 2005, representing approximately 44.6% of our 2005 Marketing Services revenue. BMO Bank of Montreal represented approximately 24.6% of this segment’s 2005 revenue. Our contract with BMO Bank of Montreal expires in 2009.

      The markets for our products and services are highly competitive, and we expect competition to intensify in each of those markets. Many of our current competitors have longer operating histories, stronger brand names and greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against our current and potential competitors.

      Our growth and continued profitability depend on acceptance of the services that we offer. If demand for transaction, credit or marketing services decreases, the price of our common stock could fall and you could lose value in your investment. We cannot guarantee that retailers will continue to use loyalty and database marketing strategies. Changes in technology may enable merchants and retail companies to directly process transactions in a cost-efficient manner without the use of our services. Additionally, downturns in the economy or the performance of retailers may result in a decrease in the demand for our marketing strategies. Further, if our customers make fewer sales of their products and services, we will have fewer transactions to process, resulting in lower revenue. Any decrease in the demand for our services for the reasons discussed above or any other reasons could have a material adverse effect on our growth and revenue.

      Historically, we have completed several acquisitions each year. We expect to continue to seek selective acquisitions as an element of our growth strategy. If we are unable to successfully integrate completed or any future acquisitions, we may incur substantial costs and delays or other operational, technical or financial problems, any of which could harm our business and impact the trading price of our common stock. In addition, the failure to successfully integrate any future acquisition may divert management’s attention from our core operations or could harm our ability to timely meet the needs of our customers. To finance future acquisitions, we may need to raise funds either by issuing equity securities or incurring debt. If we issue additional equity securities, such sales could reduce the current value of our stock by diluting the ownership interest of our stockholders.

      An important feature of our marketing and credit services is our ability to develop and maintain individual consumer profiles. As part of our AIR MILES Reward Program, database marketing program and private label credit card program, we maintain marketing databases containing information on consumers’ account transactions. Although we have extensive security procedures, our databases may be subject to unauthorized access. If we experience a security breach, the integrity of our marketing databases could be affected. Security and privacy concerns may cause consumers to resist providing the personal data necessary to support our profiling capability. The use of our loyalty, database marketing or private label credit card programs could decline if any compromise of security occurred. Any public perception that we released consumer information without authorization could subject us to legal claims from consumers and adversely affect our client relationships.

      Our ability to protect our data centers against damage from fire, power loss, telecommunications failure and other disasters is critical. In order to provide many of our services, we must be able to store, retrieve, process and manage large databases and periodically expand and upgrade our capabilities. Any damage to our data centers, any failure of our telecommunication links that interrupts our operations or any impairment of our ability to use software used by or licensed to us could adversely affect our ability to meet our clients’ needs and their confidence in utilizing us for future services.

      A significant portion of our Marketing Services revenue is derived from our operations in Canada, which transacts business in Canadian dollars. Therefore, our reported financial information from quarter-to-quarter will be affected by changes in the exchange rate between the U.S. and Canadian dollars over the relevant periods. We do not hedge any of our net investment exposure in our Canadian subsidiary.

      In order to execute our hedging strategies, our securitization trusts have entered into interest rate derivative contracts with commercial banks. These banks are otherwise known as counterparties. It is our policy to enter into such contracts with counterparties that are deemed to be creditworthy. However, if macro- or micro-economic events were to negatively impact the respective banks, the banks might not be able to honor their obligations to the securitization trusts and we might suffer a loss related to our residual interest in the securitization trusts.

      Third parties may infringe or misappropriate our trademarks or other intellectual property rights, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results. The actions we take to protect our trademarks and other proprietary rights may not be adequate. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. We cannot assure you that we will be able to prevent infringement of our intellectual property rights or misappropriation of our proprietary information. Any infringement or misappropriation could harm any competitive advantage we currently derive or may derive from our proprietary rights. Third parties may assert infringement claims against us. Any claims and any resulting litigation could subject us to significant liability for damages. An adverse determination in any litigation of this type could require us to design around a third party’s patent or to license alternative technology from another party. In addition, litigation is time-consuming and expensive to defend and could result in the diversion of our time and resources. Any claims from third parties may also result in limitations on our ability to use the intellectual property subject to these claims.

      Transaction processing companies may be subject to state taxation of certain portions of their fees charged to merchants for their services. If we are required to pay such taxes and are unable to pass this tax expense through to our merchant clients, these taxes would negatively impact our profitability.

Risks Particular to Transaction Services

      Our Transaction Services segment performs card processing and servicing activities for cardholder accounts generated by our Credit Services segment. During 2005, our Transaction Services segment derived $313.0 million, or 44.7% of its revenues, from these services for our Credit Services segment. The financial performance of our Transaction Services segment, therefore, is linked to the activities of our Credit Services segment. If the Credit Services segment were to lose a significant client, our revenue and profitability attributable to the Transaction Services segment could be materially and adversely affected.

Risks Particular to Credit Services

      Since January 1996, we have sold substantially all of the credit card receivables originated by our private label credit card bank, World Financial Network National Bank, to WFN Credit Company, LLC and WFN Funding Company II, LLC, which in turn sold them to World Financial Network Credit Card Master Trust, World Financial Network Credit Card Master Note Trust and World Financial Network Credit Card Master Trust III, which we refer to as the WFN Trusts, as part of our securitization program. This securitization program is the primary vehicle through which World Financial Network National Bank finances our private label credit card receivables. We have approximately $450.0 million of asset-backed notes that will come due in 2006. If World Financial Network National Bank were not able to regularly securitize the receivables it originates, our ability to grow or even maintain our credit services business

would be materially impaired. World Financial Network National Bank’s ability to effect securitization transactions is impacted by the following factors, some of which are beyond our control:

      Once World Financial Network National Bank securitizes receivables, the agreement governing the transaction contains covenants that address the receivables’ performance and the continued solvency of the retailer where the underlying sales were generated. In the event such a covenant or other similar covenant is breached, an early amortization event could be declared, in which case the trustee for the securitization trust would retain World Financial Network National Bank’s interest in the related receivables, along with the excess interest income that would normally be paid to World Financial Network National Bank, until such time as the securitization investors are fully repaid. The occurrence of an early amortization event would significantly limit, or even negate, our ability to securitize additional receivables.

      The primary risk associated with unsecured consumer lending is the risk of default or bankruptcy of the borrower, resulting in the borrower’s balance being charged-off as uncollectible. We rely principally on the customer’s creditworthiness for repayment of the loan and therefore have no other recourse for collection. We may not be able to successfully identify and evaluate the creditworthiness of cardholders to minimize delinquencies and losses. An increase in defaults or net charge-offs beyond historical levels will reduce the net spread available to us from the securitization master trust and could result in a reduction in finance charge income or a write-down of the interest-only strip. General economic factors, such as the rate of inflation, unemployment levels and interest rates, may result in greater delinquencies that lead to greater credit losses among consumers. In addition to being affected by general economic conditions and the success of our collection and recovery efforts, our delinquency and net credit card receivable charge-off rates are affected by the credit risk of our private label credit card receivables and the average age of our various private label credit card account portfolios. The average age of our private label credit card receivables affects the stability of delinquency and loss rates of the portfolio. An older private label credit card portfolio generally drives a more stable performance in the portfolio. At December 31, 2005, 61.9% of the total number of our securitized accounts with outstanding balances and 58.0% of the amount of our outstanding securitized receivables were for accounts with origination dates greater than 24 months old. For 2005, our managed receivables net charge-off ratio was 6.5% compared to 6.8% for 2004 and 7.4% for 2003. We cannot assure you that our pricing strategy can offset the negative impact on profitability caused by increases in delinquencies and losses. Any material increases in delinquencies and losses beyond our current estimates could have a material adverse impact on us and the value of our net retained interests in loans that we sell through securitizations.

      The estimated fair value of interest-only strips depends upon the anticipated cash flows of the related credit card receivables. A significant factor affecting the anticipated cash flows is the rate at which the underlying principal of the securitized credit card receivables is reduced. Other assumptions used in estimating the value of the interest-only strips include estimated future credit losses and a discount rate commensurate with the risks involved. The rate of cardholder payments or defaults on credit card balances may be affected by a variety of economic factors, including interest rates and the availability of alternative financing, most of which are not within our control. A decrease in interest rates could cause cardholder

payments to increase, thereby requiring a write down of the interest-only strips. If payments from cardholders or defaults by cardholders exceed our estimates, we may be required to decrease the estimated value of the interest-only strips through a charge against earnings.

      An increase in market interest rates could reduce the amount we realize from the spread between the yield on our assets and our cost of funding. A rise in market interest rates may indirectly impact the payment performance of consumers or the value of, or the amount we could realize from the sale of interest-only strips. At December 31, 2005, we had $4.1 billion of debt, including $3.3 billion of off-balance sheet debt from our securitization program.

      Assuming we do not take any counteractive measures, a 1.0% increase in interest rates would result in an annual decrease to pretax income of approximately $5.6 million related to our on-balance sheet debt. The foregoing sensitivity analysis is limited to the potential impact of an interest rate increase of 1.0% on cash flows and fair values, and does not address default or credit risk.

      We expect an important source of growth in our private label credit card operations to come from the acquisition of existing private label credit card programs and initiating private label credit card programs with retailers who do not currently offer a private label credit card. Although we believe our pricing and models for determining credit risk are designed to evaluate the credit risk of existing programs and the credit risk we are willing to assume for acquired and start-up programs, we cannot assure you that the loss experience on acquired and start-up programs will be consistent with our more established programs. The failure to successfully underwrite these private label credit card programs may result in defaults greater than our expectations and could have a material adverse impact on us and the value of our net retained interests in loans securitized.

      Various Federal and state laws and regulations significantly limit the credit services activities in which we are permitted to engage. Such laws and regulations, among other things, limit the fees and other charges that we can impose on consumers, limit or prescribe certain other terms of our products and services, require specified disclosures to consumers, or require that we maintain certain licenses, qualifications and minimum capital levels. In some cases, the precise application of these statutes and regulations is not clear. In addition, numerous legislative and regulatory proposals are advanced each year which, if adopted, could have a material adverse effect on our profitability or further restrict the manner in which we conduct our activities. The failure to comply with, or adverse changes in, the laws or regulations to which our business is subject, or adverse changes in their interpretation, could have a material adverse

effect on our ability to collect our receivables and generate fees on the receivables, thereby adversely affecting our profitability.

      If either of our depository institution subsidiaries failed to meet the criteria for the exemption from the definition of “bank” in the Bank Holding Company Act under which it operates (which exemptions are described below), and if we did not divest such depository institution upon such an occurrence, we would become subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act. This would require us to cease certain of our activities that are not permissible for companies that are subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act.

      One of our depository institution subsidiaries, World Financial Network National Bank, is a limited-purpose national credit card bank located in Ohio. World Financial Network National Bank is not a “bank” as defined under the Bank Holding Company Act because it is in compliance with the following requirements:

      Our other depository institution subsidiary, World Financial Capital Bank, is a Utah industrial bank that is authorized to do business by the State of Utah and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. World Financial Capital Bank is not a “bank” as defined under the Bank Holding Company Act because it is an industrial bank in compliance with the following requirements:

      While the consequences of being subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act would be severe, we believe that the risk of becoming subject to such regulation is minimal as a result of the precautions we have taken in structuring our business.

      Our industrial bank, World Financial Capital Bank, is authorized to do business by the State of Utah and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. World Financial Capital Bank is subject to capital ratios and paid-in capital minimums and must maintain adequate allowances for loan losses and operate within its three-year business plan. While the consequence of losing the World Financial Capital Bank authority to do business would be significant, we believe that the risk of such loss is minimal as a result of the precautions we have taken and the management team we have in place.

Risks Particular to Marketing Services

      A portion of our revenue is based on our estimate of the number of AIR MILES reward miles that will go unused by the collector base. The percentage of unredeemed reward miles is known as “breakage” in the loyalty industry. AIR MILES reward miles currently do not expire. We experience breakage when reward miles are not redeemed by collectors for a number of reasons, including:

      If actual redemptions are greater than our estimates, our profitability could be adversely affected due to the cost of the excess redemptions.

      As a result of increased competition in the loyalty market, including from Aeroplan, Air Canada’s frequent flyer program, we may experience greater competition in attracting and retaining sponsors in our AIR MILES Reward Program.

      Our most active AIR MILES reward miles collectors affect a disproportionately large percentage of our AIR MILES Reward Program revenue. We estimate that over half of the AIR MILES Reward Program revenues for 2006 will be associated with our AIR MILES collectors who participate most actively. The loss of a significant portion of these collectors, for any reason, could impact our ability to generate significant revenue from sponsors and loyalty partners. The continued attractiveness of our loyalty and rewards programs will depend in large part on our ability to remain affiliated with sponsors that are desirable to consumers and to offer rewards that are both attainable and attractive.

      Air travel is one of the appeals of the AIR MILES Reward Program to collectors. As a result of airline insolvencies and restructurings, we may experience service disruptions that prevent us from fulfilling collectors’ flight redemption requests. If one of our existing airline suppliers sharply reduces its fleet capacity and route network, we may not be able to satisfy our collectors’ demands for airline tickets. Tickets from other airlines, if available, could be more expensive than a comparable ticket under our current supply agreements with existing suppliers, and the routes offered by the other airlines may be inadequate, inconvenient or undesirable to the redeeming collectors. As a result, we may experience higher air travel redemption costs and collector satisfaction with the AIR MILES Reward Program might be adversely affected.

      As a result of airline or travel industry disruptions, or as might result from political instability, terrorist acts or war, some collectors could determine that air travel is too dangerous or, given new airport regulations, too burdensome. Consequently, collectors might forego redeeming reward miles for air travel and therefore might not participate in the AIR MILES Reward Program to the extent they previously did, which could adversely affect our revenue from the program. A reduction in collector use of the program could impact our ability to attract new sponsors and loyalty partners and to generate revenue from current sponsors and loyalty partners.

      The enactment of legislation or industry regulations arising from public concern over consumer privacy issues could have a material adverse impact on our marketing services. Any such legislation or industry regulations could place restrictions upon the collection and use of information that is currently legally available, which could materially increase our cost of collecting some data. Legislation or industry regulation could also prohibit us from collecting or disseminating certain types of data, which could adversely affect our ability to meet our clients’ requirements.

      In the United States, the federal Gramm Leach Bliley Act makes it more difficult to collect and use information that has been legally available and may increase our costs of collecting some data. Regulations under this act give cardholders the ability to “opt out” of having information generated by their credit card purchases shared with other parties or the public. Our ability to gather and utilize this data will be adversely affected if a significant percentage of the consumers whose purchasing behavior we track elect to “opt out,” thereby precluding us from using their data. Under the regulations, we generally are required to refrain from sharing data generated by our new cardholders until such cardholders are given the opportunity to “opt out.”

      In the United States, the federal Do-Not-Call Implementation Act makes it more difficult to telephonically communicate with customers. Regulations under this act give consumers the ability to “opt out,” through a national do-not-call list, a state do-not-call list or an internal do-not-call list which is required by the regulation, of having telephone calls placed to them by telemarketers who do not have an existing business relationship with the consumer. This act could limit our ability to provide services and information to our clients. Failure to comply with the terms of this act could have a negative impact to our reputation and subject us to significant penalties.

      In the United States, the federal Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act restricts our ability to send commercial electronic mail messages to customers. The act requires that a customer provide consent prior to a commercial electronic mail message being sent to the customer and further restricts the transmission information (header/subject line) and content of the electronic mail message. Under the regulation, we generally are prohibited from issuing electronic mail or obtaining a benefit from an electronic mail message until such time as the customer has affirmatively granted permission for us to do so. Failure to comply with the terms of this act could have a negative impact to our reputation and subject us to significant penalties.

      In Canada, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act requires organizations to obtain a consumer’s consent to collect, use or disclose personal information. Under this act, which took effect on January 1, 2001, the nature of the required consent depends on the sensitivity of the personal information, and the act permits personal information to be used only for the purposes for which it was collected. We allow our customers to voluntarily “opt out” from receiving either one or both promotional and marketing mail or promotional and marketing electronic mail. Heightened consumer awareness of, and concern about, privacy may result in customers “opting out” at higher rates than they have historically. This would mean that a reduced number of customers would receive bonus mile offers and therefore would collect fewer AIR MILES reward miles.

Risks Related to Our Company

      As of February 28, 2006, the affiliated entities of Welsh Carson beneficially owned approximately 17.3% of our outstanding common stock. Welsh Carson is able to exercise significant influence over matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, changes to our charter

documents and significant corporate transactions. Welsh Carson may have interests that conflict with our interests or those of other stockholders. Welsh Carson’s continued concentrated ownership will make it difficult for another company to acquire us and for you to receive any related takeover premium for your shares unless Welsh Carson approves the acquisition.

      Delaware law, as well as provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, could discourage unsolicited proposals to acquire us, even though such proposals may be beneficial to you. These provisions include:

      These provisions of our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law could discourage tender offers or other transactions that might otherwise result in our stockholders receiving a premium over the market price for our common stock.

      As of February 28, 2006, we had an aggregate of 98,951,592 shares of our common stock authorized but unissued and not reserved for specific purposes. In general, we may issue all of these shares without any action or approval by our stockholders. We have reserved 21,003,000 shares of our common stock for issuance under our employee stock purchase plan and our long term incentive plans, of which 7,965,192 shares are issuable upon vesting of restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, and upon exercise of options granted as of February 28, 2006, including options to purchase approximately 3,921,897 shares exercisable as of February 28, 2006 or that will become exercisable within 60 days after February 28, 2006. We have reserved for issuance 1,500,000 shares of our common stock, all of which remain issuable, under our 401(k) and Retirement Savings Plan. In addition, we may pursue acquisitions of competitors and related businesses and may issue shares of our common stock in connection with these acquisitions. Sales or issuances of a substantial number of shares of common stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock, and any sale or issuance of our common stock will dilute the percentage ownership held by our stockholders. Further, sales of a substantial number of shares of common stock by our largest stockholder, Welsh Carson, or the perception that such sales could occur, could also adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock.

      None.

      As of December 31, 2005, we leased over 35 general office properties throughout the United States and Canada, comprising over 2.1 million square feet. These facilities are used to carry out our operational, sales and administrative functions. Our principal facilities are as follows:

      We believe our current and proposed facilities are suitable to our businesses and that we will be able to lease, purchase or newly construct additional facilities as needed.

      From time to time, we are involved in various claims and lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of our business that we believe will not have a material adverse affect on our business or financial condition, including claims and lawsuits alleging breaches of contractual obligations.

      There were no matters submitted to a vote of the security holders during the fourth quarter of 2005.

PART II

Market Information

      Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and trades under the symbol “ADS.” The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low composite per share closing sales prices as reported by the New York Stock Exchange.

Holders

      As of February 28, 2006, the closing price of our common stock was $43.26 per share, there were 80,478,288 shares of our common stock outstanding, and there were approximately 160 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

      We have never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance operations and the expansion of our business. Any future determination to pay cash dividends on our common stock will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements and other factors that our board deems relevant. In addition, under the terms of our credit facilities, we cannot declare or pay dividends or return capital to our common stockholders, and we are restricted in the amount of any other distribution, payment or delivery of property or cash to our common stockholders.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

      On June 8, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to acquire up to an aggregate of $80.0 million of our outstanding common stock through June 2006. On October 27, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase program to acquire up to an additional $220.0 million of our outstanding common stock through October 2006. At December 31, 2005, we had repurchased 3,942,100 shares of our common stock for approximately $148.8 million under these programs. Additionally, the administrator of our 401(k) and Retirement Savings Plan purchased shares of our common stock for the benefit of the employees who participated in that portion of the plan during the fourth quarter of 2005. The following table presents information with respect to those purchases of our common stock made during the three months ended December 31, 2005:

Equity Compensation Plan Information

      The following table provides information as of December 31, 2005 with respect to shares of our common stock that may be issued under the 2003 Long Term Incentive Plan, the Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, the 2005 Long Term Incentive Plan, the Executive Annual Incentive Plan or the Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan:

SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING INFORMATION

      The following table sets forth our summary historical financial information for the periods ended and as of the dates indicated. You should read the following historical financial information along with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in this Form 10-K and the financial statements and related notes that are incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. The fiscal year financial information included in the table below is derived from audited financial statements.

Overview

      We are a leading provider of transaction services, credit services and marketing services in North America. We partner with our clients to develop unique insight into consumer behavior. We use that insight to create and manage customized solutions that we believe change consumer behavior and enable our clients to build stronger, mutually-beneficial relationships with their customers. We focus on facilitating and managing interactions between our clients and their customers. We operate in three business segments: Transaction Services, Credit Services and Marketing Services.

      Transaction Services. Transaction Services is our largest segment. The Transaction Services segment primarily generates revenue based on the number of statements generated, customer calls handled and transactions processed. Statements generated is the primary driver of revenue for this segment and represents the majority of revenue.

      Transaction Services primarily is affected by increased outsourcing in our targeted industry verticals. Companies are increasingly outsourcing their non-core processes such as customer information systems, billing and customer care. We are impacted by this trend with our clients in utility services and issuer services.

      Credit Services. The Credit Services segment primarily generates revenue from servicing fees from our securitization trusts, merchant discount fees, and securitization income. Private label credit sales and average managed receivables are the two primary drivers of revenue for this segment.

      Credit Services is affected by industry trends similar to Transaction Services. The growing trend of outsourcing of private label credit card programs leads to increased accounts and balances to finance. We focus our sales efforts on prime borrowers and do not target sub-prime borrowers. Additionally, economic trends can impact this segment. Interest expense is a significant component of operating costs for the securitized trusts. Over the last three years we have experienced a historically low interest rate environment. We have refinanced our recent bond maturities with instruments that lock in our effective interest rate for up to five year terms and in some cases entered into declining swap rates. Interest rates in 2005 were similar to the rates in 2004. A low interest rate environment is usually indicative of a slower economic environment, which can negatively impact our net charge-offs, a significant cost of financing receivables. In the last five years, our net charge-offs decreased from a peak of 8.4% in 2001 to our current 2005 rate of 6.5%. During the fourth quarter of 2005, Congress enacted new bankruptcy legislation with a two-fold impact. First, an acceleration of bankruptcies occurred in October and November as the

result of cardholders filing under the previous bankruptcy legislation, which was more lenient. Second, future filings under the new legislation will make it more difficult for cardholders to dispose of their obligations. Our expectation for 2006 is that we will experience similar or better levels of net charge-offs and cost of funds as we experienced during 2005.

      Marketing Services. Marketing Services has historically been represented primarily by our AIR MILES Reward Program, which we believe to be the largest coalition loyalty program in Canada. We primarily collect fees from our clients based on the number of AIR MILES reward miles issued and in limited circumstances the number of AIR MILES reward miles redeemed. All of the fees collected for AIR MILES reward miles issued are deferred and recognized over time. AIR MILES reward miles issued and AIR MILES reward miles redeemed are the two primary drivers of revenue for this segment, and as a result they are both indicators of the success of the program. These two drivers are also important in the revenue recognition process.

      Our AIR MILES Reward Program tends not to be significantly impacted by economic swings as the majority of the sponsors are in non-discretionary categories such as grocery, petroleum and financial institutions. Additionally, we target the sponsors’ most loyal customers, who are unlikely to change their spending patterns. We are impacted by changes in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Canadian dollar. The Canadian dollar appreciated this year, which benefited our operating results. Our expectation is that the Canadian dollar/ U.S. dollar exchange rate will be more stable in 2006 than in 2005 and remain at its current relative levels. Beginning in late 2004, with the acquisition of Epsilon, we began an expansion of our marketing services in the U.S. We continued our U.S. expansion in 2005 with the acquisition of Bigfoot Interactive, now known as Epsilon Interactive. Epsilon Interactive gives us a significant presence in e-mail communication solutions.

Year in Review Highlights

      Our 2005 results included significant new and renewed agreements with significant clients and continued selective execution of our acquisition strategy.

Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies

      Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting policies that are described in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We continually evaluate our judgments and estimates in determination of our financial condition and operating results. Estimates are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements and, accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates, sometimes materially. Critical accounting policies and estimates are defined as those that are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and operating results and require management’s most subjective judgments. The most critical accounting policies and estimates are described below.

      Securitization of credit card receivables. We utilize a securitization program to finance substantially all of the credit card receivables that we underwrite. Our securitization trusts allow us to sell credit card receivables to the trusts on a daily basis. We use our off-balance sheet securitization program to lower our cost of funds and more efficiently use capital. In a securitization transaction, we sell credit card receivables originated by our Credit Services segment to a trust and retain servicing rights to those receivables, an equity interest in the trust, and an interest in the receivables. The securitization trusts are deemed to be qualifying special purpose entities under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and are appropriately not included in our Consolidated Financial Statements. Our interest in the trusts is represented on our consolidated balance sheets as seller’s interest (our interest in the receivables) and due from securitizations (our retained interests and credit enhancement components).

      In turn, the trusts issue bonds in the capital markets and notes in private transactions. The proceeds from the debt are used to fund the receivables, while cash collected from cardholders is used to finance new receivables and repay borrowings and related borrowing costs. The excess spread is remitted to us as securitization income.

      Our retained interest, often referred to as an interest-only strip, is recorded at fair value. Our interest-only strip has historically been valued between 1.75% and 2.50% of average securitized receivables. The fair value of our interest-only strip represents the present value of the anticipated cash flows we will receive over the estimated life of the receivables, or 7.5 months. This anticipated excess cash flow consists of the excess of finance charges and past-due fees net of the sum of the return paid to bond holders, estimated contractual servicing fees and credit losses. Because there is not a highly liquid market for these assets, we estimated the fair value of the interest-only strip primarily based upon discount, payment and default rates, which is the method we assume that another market participant would use to purchase the interest-only strip. The fair value of the interest-only strip, and the corresponding gain or loss, will be impacted by the estimated excess spread over the next two or three quarters. The excess spread is impacted primarily by finance and late fees collected, net charge-offs and interest rates.

      Changes in the fair value of the interest-only strip are reflected in our consolidated financial statements as additional gains related to new receivables originated and securitized or other comprehensive income related to mark to market changes.

      In recording and accounting for interest-only strips, we make assumptions about rates of payments and defaults that we believe reasonably reflect economic and other relevant conditions that affect fair value. Due to subsequent changes in economic and other relevant conditions, the actual rates of payments and defaults generally differ from our initial estimates, and these differences could sometimes be material. If actual payment and default rates are higher than previously assumed, the value of the interest-only strip could be impaired and the decline in the fair value recorded in earnings. Further sensitivity information is provided in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

      We recognize the implicit forward contract to sell new receivables during a revolving period at its fair value at the time of sale. The implicit forward contract is entered into at the market rate and thus, its initial measure is zero at inception. In addition, we do not mark the forward contract to fair value in accounting periods following the securitization as we do not believe the fair value of the implicit forward contract in subsequent periods to be material.

      AIR MILES Reward Program. Because management has determined that the earnings process is not complete at the time an AIR MILES reward mile is issued, the recognition of revenue on all fees received based on issuance is deferred. We allocate the proceeds from issuances of AIR MILES reward miles into two components based on the relative fair value of the related element:

      Under certain of our contracts, a portion of the proceeds is paid to us at the issuance of AIR MILES reward miles and a portion is paid at the time of redemption. Under such contracts the proceeds received at issuance are initially deferred as service revenue and the revenue and earnings are recognized pro rata over the estimated life of an AIR MILES reward mile.

      The amount of revenue recognized in a period is subject to the estimated life of an AIR MILES reward mile. Based on our historical analysis, we make a determination as to average life of an AIR MILES reward mile. The estimated life of an AIR MILES reward mile of 42 months and breakage of one-third has remained constant. Breakage and the life of an AIR MILES reward mile is based on management’s estimate after viewing and analyzing various historical trends including vintage analysis,

current run rates and other pertinent analysis. During 2005, we engaged a nationally recognized accounting firm to perform an independent analysis of our breakage assumptions. Their conclusion supports management’s breakage estimate of one-third. The estimated life of an AIR MILES reward mile and breakage is actively monitored by management and subject to external influences that may cause actual performance to differ from estimates.

      We believe that the issuance and redemption of AIR MILES reward miles is influenced by the nature and volume of sponsors, the type of rewards offered, the overall health of the Canadian economy, the nature and extent of AIR MILES promotional activity in the marketplace and the extent of competing loyalty programs. These influences will primarily affect the average life of an AIR MILES reward mile. We do not believe that the estimated life will vary significantly over time, consistent with historical trends. The shortening of the life of an AIR MILES reward mile will accelerate the recognition of revenue and may affect the breakage rate. As of December 31, 2005, we had $610.5 million in deferred revenue related to the AIR MILES Reward Program that will be recognized in the future. Further information is provided in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Inter-Segment Sales

      Our Transaction Services segment performs card processing and servicing activities related to our Credit Services segment. For this, our Transaction Services segment receives a fee equal to its direct costs before corporate overhead plus a margin. The margin is based on current estimated market rates for similar services. This fee represents an operating cost to the Credit Services segment and a corresponding revenue for our Transaction Services segment. Inter-segment sales are eliminated upon consolidation. Revenues earned by our Transaction Services segment from servicing our Credit Services segment, and consequently paid by our Credit Services segment to our Transaction Services segment, are set forth opposite “Other/eliminations” in the tables presented in the annual comparisons in our “Results of Operations.”

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

      Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, plus stock compensation expense, provision for income taxes, interest expense, net, fair value loss on interest rate derivative, depreciation and other amortization and amortization of purchased intangibles. Operating EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to adjusted EBITDA plus the change in deferred revenue plus the change in redemption settlement assets. We have presented operating EBITDA because we use the financial measure as part of our monitoring of compliance with the financial covenants in our credit facilities. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2005, senior debt-to-operating EBITDA was 1.1x compared to a maximum ratio of 2.5x permitted in the credit facilities and operating EBITDA to interest expense was 22.0x compared to a minimum ratio of 3.5x permitted in the credit facilities. As discussed in more detail in the liquidity section of the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, our credit facilities together with cash flow from operations are the two main sources of funding for our acquisition strategy and for our future working capital needs and capital expenditures. As of December 31, 2005, we had borrowings of $441.0 million outstanding under these credit facilities and had approximately $74.0 million in unused borrowing capacity. During January 2006, we increased our borrowing capacity by an incremental $300.0 million through entering into an additional credit agreement. We were in compliance with our covenants at December 31, 2005, and we expect to be in compliance with these covenants during the year ending December 31, 2006.

      We use adjusted EBITDA as an integral part of our internal reporting to measure the performance of our reportable segments and to evaluate the performance of our senior management. Adjusted EBITDA is considered an important indicator of the operational strength of our businesses. Adjusted EBITDA eliminates the uneven effect across all business segments of considerable amounts of non-cash depreciation of tangible assets and amortization of certain intangible assets that were recognized in business combinations. A limitation of this measure, however, is that it does not reflect the periodic costs of certain capitalized tangible and intangible assets used in generating revenues in our businesses. Management evaluates the costs of such tangible and intangible assets, the impact of related impairments, as well as asset sales through other financial measures, such as capital expenditures, investment spending and return on capital. Adjusted EBITDA also eliminates the non-cash effect of stock compensation expense. Stock compensation expense is not included in the measurement of segment adjusted EBITDA provided to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of assessing segment performance and decision making with respect to resource allocations. Therefore, we believe that adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to our investors regarding our performance and overall results of operations. Adjusted EBITDA and operating EBITDA are not intended to be performance measures that should be regarded as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, either operating income or net income as an indicator of operating performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. In addition, adjusted EBITDA and operating EBITDA are not intended to represent funds available for dividends, reinvestment or other discretionary uses, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The adjusted EBITDA and operating EBITDA measures presented

in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies, and may not be identical to corresponding measures used in our various agreements.

Results of Operations

      Revenue. Total revenue increased $295.0 million, or 23.5%, to $1,552.4 million for 2005 from $1,257.4 million for 2004. The increase was due to a 2.7% increase in Transaction Services revenue, a 9.2% increase in Credit Services revenue and a 60.8% increase in Marketing Services revenue as follows:

      Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses, excluding depreciation, amortization and stock compensation expense increased $223.8 million, or 22.9%, to $1,202.0 million for 2005 from $978.2 million for 2004. Total adjusted EBITDA margin increased to 22.6% for 2005 from 22.2% for 2004. The increase in adjusted EBITDA margin is due to increases in Marketing Services and Credit Services margins, partially offset by a decrease in Transaction Services.

      Operating Income. Operating income increased $64.5 million, or 37.5%, to $236.6 million for 2005 from $172.1 million for 2004. Operating income increased primarily from revenue gains and an increase in adjusted EBITDA margins partially offset by an increase in depreciation and amortization and stock compensation expense.

      Interest Expense, net. Interest expense, net, increased $7.5 million, or 107.1%, to $14.5 million for 2005 from $7.0 million for 2004 due to higher average balances under our credit facilities and certificates of deposit.

      Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes increased $21.5 million to $83.4 million in 2005 from $61.9 million in 2004 primarily due to an increase in taxable income. The effective rate remained relatively flat, decreasing to 37.5% in 2005 from 37.7% in 2004.

      Revenue. Total revenue increased $210.9 million, or 20.2%, to $1,257.4 million for 2004 from $1,046.5 million for 2003. The increase was due to the following:

      Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses, excluding depreciation, amortization and stock compensation expense increased $142.9 million, or 17.1%, to $978.2 million for 2004 from $835.3 million for 2003. Total adjusted EBITDA margin increased to 22.2% for 2004 from 20.2% for 2003. The increase in adjusted EBITDA margin is due to increases in Marketing Services and Credit Services margins.

      Operating Income. Operating income increased $41.3 million, or 31.6%, to $172.1 million for 2004 from $130.8 million for 2003. Operating income increased primarily from revenue gains, an increase in adjusted EBITDA margins offset by an increase in depreciation and amortization and stock compensation expense.

      Interest Expense, net. Interest expense, net, decreased $7.7 million, or 52.4%, to $7.0 million for 2004 from $14.7 million for 2003 due to lower average debt outstanding.

      Fair Value Loss on Derivatives. During 2004, we incurred a $0.8 million fair value loss on an interest rate swap compared to a $2.9 million loss in 2003. Part of the fair value loss was associated with cash payments we made to counterparties of $5.5 million and $11.1 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended, fair value changes in derivative instruments that do not meet the accounting criteria for hedge treatment are recorded as part of earnings. The related derivative was a $200.0 million notional amount interest rate swap that swapped a LIBOR based variable interest rate for a fixed interest rate, and expired in May 2004.

      Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes increased $20.2 million to $61.9 million in 2004 from $41.7 million in 2003 primarily due to an increase in taxable income. The effective rate remained relatively flat, decreasing to 37.7% in 2004 from 38.3% in 2003.

Asset Quality

      Our delinquency and net charge-off rates reflect, among other factors, the credit risk of our private label credit card receivables, the average age of our various private label credit card account portfolios, the success of our collection and recovery efforts, and general economic conditions. The average age of our private label credit card portfolio affects the stability of delinquency and loss rates of the portfolio. We continue to focus our resources on refining our credit underwriting standards for new accounts and on collections and post charge-off recovery efforts to minimize net losses.

      An older private label credit card portfolio generally drives a more stable performance in the portfolio. At December 31, 2005, 61.9% of securitized accounts with balances and 58.0% of securitized receivables were for accounts with origination dates greater than 24 months old. As of December 31, 2005, our allowance for doubtful accounts related to on-balance sheet private label credit card receivables was $38.4 million compared to $11.7 million as of December 31, 2004. The increase is primarily related to the acquisition of the Blair portfolio and secondarily on-balance sheet receivable growth and the related allowance for doubtful accounts.

      Delinquencies. A credit card account is contractually delinquent if we do not receive the minimum payment by the specified due date on the cardholder’s statement. It is our policy to continue to accrue interest and fee income on all credit card accounts, except in limited circumstances, until the account balance and all related interest and other fees are charged off or paid, beyond 90 days delinquent. When an account becomes delinquent, we print a message on the cardholder’s billing statement requesting payment. After an account becomes 30 days past due, a proprietary collection scoring algorithm automatically scores the risk of the account rolling to a more delinquent status. The collection system then recommends a collection strategy for the past due account based on the collection score and account balance and dictates the contact schedule and collections priority for the account. Our proprietary system will zero out a customer’s credit limit when charging privileges are removed from the account. If we are unable to make a collection after exhausting all in-house efforts, we engage collection agencies and outside attorneys to continue those efforts.

      The following table presents the delinquency trends of our managed credit card portfolio:

      Net Charge-Offs. Net charge-offs comprise the principal amount of losses from cardholders unwilling or unable to pay their account balances, as well as bankrupt and deceased cardholders, less current period recoveries. The following table presents our net charge-offs for the periods indicated on a managed basis. Average managed receivables represents the average balance of the cardholder receivables, excluding those which we do not bear the risk of loss, at the beginning of each month in the year indicated.

      We believe, consistent with our statistical models and other credit analyses, that our net charge-off ratio will continue to fluctuate.

      Age of Portfolio. The median age of the portfolio is 36 months. The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2005, the number of securitized accounts with balances and the related balances outstanding, based upon the age of the securitized accounts:

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Operating Activities. We have historically generated cash flows from operations, although that amount may vary based on fluctuations in working capital and the timing of merchant settlement activity. Our operating cash flow is seasonal, with cash utilization peaking at the end of December due to increased activity in our Credit Services segment related to holiday retail sales.

      Net change in credit card portfolio activity represents the difference in portfolios purchased from new clients and their subsequent sale to our securitization trusts. There is typically a several month lag between the purchase and sale of credit card portfolios. During late 2005, we purchased credit card portfolios from Blair that have not been securitized. We securitized no portfolios in 2005. Merchant settlement activity is driven by the number of days of float at the end of the period. For these purposes, “float” means the difference between the number of days we hold cash before remitting the cash to our merchants and the number of days the card associations hold cash before remitting the cash to us. Merchant settlement activity fluctuates significantly depending on the day in which the period ends.

      We generated cash flow from operating activities before changes in credit card portfolio activity and merchant settlement activity of $293.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to $259.6 million for the comparable period in 2004 or a 13.2% increase. The increase in operating cash flows before changes in credit card portfolio activity and merchant settlement activity is primarily related to our increased earnings. We utilize our cash flow from operations for ongoing business operations, acquisitions and capital expenditures.

      Investing Activities. We use a significant portion of our cash flows from operations for acquisitions and capital expenditures. We utilized cash flow for investing activities of $331.0 million for the year ended

December 31, 2005 compared to $399.9 million for the comparable period in 2004. Significant components of investing activities are as follows:

      Financing Activities. Our cash flows provided by financing activities were $278.6 million in 2005 compared to $66.4 million used in financing activities in 2004. Our financing activities for 2005 relate to borrowings and repayments of debt in the normal course of business, an increase in borrowings of certificates of deposit related to the higher level of credit card receivables held on our balance sheet, $145.0 million from the repurchase of our common stock on the open market, and proceeds from the exercise of stock options.

      Liquidity Sources. In addition to cash generated by operating activities, we have four main sources of liquidity: our securitization program; certificates of deposit issued by World Financial Network National Bank; our credit facilities; and issuances of equity securities. We believe that internally generated funds and existing sources of liquidity are sufficient to meet current and anticipated financing requirements during the next 12 months.

      Securitization Program and Off-Balance Sheet Transactions. Since January 1996, we have sold, sometimes through WFN Credit Company, LLC and WFN Funding Company II, LLC, substantially all of the credit card receivables owned by our credit card bank, World Financial Network National Bank, to the WFN Trusts as part of our securitization program. This securitization program is the primary vehicle through which we finance our private label credit card receivables. The following table shows expected maturities for borrowing commitments of the WFN Trusts under our securitization program by year:

      As of December 31, 2005, the WFN Trusts had over $3.4 billion of securitized credit card receivables. Securitizations require credit enhancements in the form of cash, spread deposits and additional

receivables. The credit enhancement is principally based on the outstanding balances of the series issued by the WFN Trusts and by the performance of the private label credit cards in the securitization trust. During the period from November to January, the WFN Trusts are required to maintain a credit enhancement level of between 6% and 10% of securitized credit card receivables. Certain of the WFN Trusts are required to maintain a level of between 4% and 9% for the remainder of the year. Accordingly, at December 31, 2005 the WFN Trusts typically have their highest balance of credit enhancement assets as a result of the increased balances during the holiday season. We intend to utilize our securitization program for the foreseeable future.

      If World Financial Network National Bank were not able to regularly securitize the receivables it originates, our ability to grow or even maintain our credit services business would be materially impaired as we would be severely limited in our financing ability. World Financial Network National Bank’s ability to effect securitization transactions is impacted by the following factors, some of which are beyond our control:

      We believe that the conditions to securitize private label credit card receivables are favorable for us. We plan to continue using our securitization program as our primary financing vehicle.

      Once World Financial Network National Bank securitizes receivables, the agreement governing the transaction contains covenants that address the receivables’ performance and the continued solvency of the retailer where the underlying sales were generated. In the event one of those or other similar covenants is breached, an early amortization event could be declared, in which case the trustee for the securitization trust would retain World Financial Network National Bank’s interest in the related receivables, along with the excess interest income that would normally be paid to World Financial Network National Bank, until such time as the securitization investors are fully repaid. The occurrence of an early amortization event would significantly limit, or even negate, our ability to securitize additional receivables.

      Certificates of Deposit. We utilize certificates of deposit to finance the operating activities and fund securitization enhancement requirements of our credit card bank subsidiaries, World Financial Network National Bank and World Financial Capital Bank. World Financial Network National Bank and World Financial Capital Bank issue certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 in various maturities ranging between three months and two years and with effective annual fixed rates ranging from 3.9% to 5.0%. As of December 31, 2005, we had $379.1 million of certificates of deposit outstanding. Certificate of deposit borrowings are subject to regulatory capital requirements.

      Credit Facilities. On April 7, 2005, we entered into amendments to our three credit facilities. The amendment to the 3-year credit facility extended the maturity date from April 10, 2006 to April 3, 2008. The amendment to the 364-day credit facility extended the maturity date from April 7, 2005 to April 6, 2006. The amendment to the Canadian credit facility extended the maturity date from April 10, 2006 to April 3, 2008 and reduced the aggregate amount of the commitments permitted thereunder by $15.0 million from $50.0 million to $35.0 million.