SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11c or Section 240.14a-12
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) Total fee paid:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Filing Party:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Date Filed:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
#Royal Appliance Logo# #Dirt Devil Trademark#
March 14, 2003
Dear Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. Shareholder:
The board of directors of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. has unanimously agreed
to merge with TIC Acquisition Corp., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of
TechTronic Industries Co., Ltd. After undertaking a strategic review with the
objective of enhancing shareholder value, the board unanimously determined that
the merger is in the best interests of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. shareholders.
A special meeting of shareholders to vote on the merger and related matters
has been scheduled for April 22, 2003 at 9:00 a.m., Cleveland time, to be held
at The Forum Conference Center, One Cleveland Center, 1375 East Ninth Street,
Cleveland, Ohio. The merger cannot be completed unless shareholders holding
two-thirds of the outstanding shares vote to adopt the merger agreement.
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTICE OF MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT, WHICH IS FIRST
BEING MAILED ON OR ABOUT MARCH 14, 2003, EXPLAIN THE MERGER AND PROVIDE SPECIFIC
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE SPECIAL MEETING. PLEASE READ THESE MATERIALS
CAREFULLY.
Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares you own. To
be certain that your shares are voted at the special meeting, please mark, sign,
date and return promptly the enclosed proxy card, whether or not you plan to
attend the special meeting in person. If you attend the meeting and decide to
vote in person, you may withdraw your proxy at the meeting. If you do not vote,
it will have the same effect as voting against the merger.
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.'s board strongly supports the merger and is
recommending that you vote in favor of adopting the merger agreement.
Sincerely,
Michael J. Merriman
President and CEO
#Royal Applicance Logo# #Dirt Devil Trademark#
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
CLEVELAND, OHIO
NOTICE OF SPECIAL SHAREHOLDERS MEETING
TO BE HELD ON APRIL 22, 2003
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of shareholders of Royal
Appliance Mfg. Co., an Ohio corporation (the "Company"), will be held on April
22, 2003, at 9:00 a.m., local time at The Forum Conference Center, One Cleveland
Center, 1375 East Ninth Street, Cleveland, Ohio, for the following purposes, as
further described in the accompanying proxy statement:
(1) Adoption of Merger Agreement. To consider and vote on a proposal
to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 16, 2002
(the "Merger Agreement"), by and among the Company, TechTronic Industries
Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of Hong Kong,
("TechTronic"), RAMC Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly
owned subsidiary of TechTronic ("Acquiror"), and TIC Acquisition Corp, an
Ohio corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Acquiror ("Merger Sub"),
and the transactions contemplated thereby, including, without limitation,
the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company (the "Merger").
(2) Other Matters. To act upon other business as may properly come
before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, including, without
limitation, the right to adjourn or postpone the special meeting in order
to solicit additional votes from Royal shareholders.
Only shareholders of record of common stock of the Company at the close of
business on February 28, 2003 (the "Record Date") are entitled to notice of, and
to vote at, the special meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. A
list of shareholders of record as of the Record Date will be available for
inspection at the Company's offices at 7005 Cochran Road, Glenwillow, Ohio, at
least ten days prior to the special meeting.
As a result of the Merger, each Royal share (except shares held by
shareholders who properly perfect their dissenters' rights with respect to their
shares under Ohio law and treasury shares owned by the Company) will be
converted into the right to receive $7.37 in cash. The accompanying proxy
statement contains detailed information about the Merger Agreement, the Merger,
and the actions to be taken in connection with the Merger. The terms of the
Merger are more fully described in the Merger Agreement, which is attached as
Annex A to the accompanying proxy statement.
Shareholders who properly perfect dissenters' rights as set forth in
Section 1701.84 and Section 1701.85 of the Ohio Revised Code will be entitled,
if the Merger is completed, to receive payment of the fair cash value of their
shares as determined by an Ohio court. See the section entitled "Dissenters'
Rights" in the accompanying proxy statement and the full text of Section 1701.84
and Section 1701.85 of the Ohio Revised Code, which is attached as Annex C to
the accompanying proxy statement, for a description of the procedures that
shareholders must follow in order to exercise their dissenters' rights.
The Board of Directors of the Company, after careful consideration, has
unanimously determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated by, the Merger Agreement, including the Merger, are fair and in the
best interests of Royal shareholders. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY HAS
UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED THAT ROYAL SHAREHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" ADOPTING
THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND GRANTING DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO THE PROXIES WITH
RESPECT TO OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE SPECIAL MEETING.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Richard G. Vasek
Secretary
Glenwillow, Ohio
March 14, 2003
IMPORTANT
Your vote is important. ALL SHAREHOLDERS ARE INVITED TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS IN PERSON. HOWEVER, TO ASSURE THAT YOUR VOTE IS COUNTED
AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, PLEASE MARK, DATE AND SIGN YOUR PROXY AND RETURN IT
PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. Any shareholder attending the special meeting
may vote in person even if the shareholder returned a proxy. No postage is
required if mailed in the United States.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR STOCK CERTIFICATES AT THIS TIME. IF THE PROPOSED
MERGER IS COMPLETED, YOU WILL BE SENT INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING THE SURRENDER OF
YOUR CERTIFICATES.
If a properly executed proxy card is submitted and no instructions are
given, the shares represented by that proxy will be voted "FOR" adopting the
Merger Agreement and will provide discretionary authority to the proxies to vote
on such other matters as may be properly brought before the special meeting,
including in favor of a proposal to adjourn or postpone the meeting to solicit
additional votes.
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES
COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THE MERGER, PASSED UPON THE MERITS OR
FAIRNESS OF THE MERGER, OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE
DISCLOSURE IN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE
CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
This proxy statement incorporates by reference important business and
financial information about the Company from documents filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission that are available without charge from the Securities
and Exchange Commission's website at www.sec.gov. See "ADDITIONAL INFORMATION"
on page 43. Shareholders may request copies of these documents, without charge,
by writing to Royal Appliance Mfg. Co., 7005 Cochran Road, Glenwillow, Ohio
44139, Attention: Investor Relations Department, or by calling Royal Appliance
Mfg. Co. at (440) 996-2000.
This proxy statement is first being mailed to shareholders on or about
March 14, 2003.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
SUMMARY
The Parties............................................ 1
Effects of the Merger.................................. 2
The Special Meeting.................................... 2
Board of Directors' Recommendation..................... 4
Principal Shareholders' Voting Agreement............... 4
Opinion of the Financial Adviser....................... 4
Interests of Royal Directors and Officers in the
Transaction........................................... 5
Tax Consequences....................................... 5
The Merger Agreement................................... 5
Dissenters' Rights..................................... 7
PRICE RANGE OF SHARES; DIVIDENDS............................ 8
THE SPECIAL MEETING......................................... 8
Where and When the Special Meeting will be Held........ 8
What will be Voted Upon................................ 8
Required Votes......................................... 8
Voting Shares by Proxy................................. 9
Dissenting Holders..................................... 9
Exchanging Share Certificates.......................... 9
Plan Voting............................................ 10
Proxy Solicitation; Solicitation Costs................. 10
SPECIAL FACTORS............................................. 10
Background of the Merger............................... 10
Recommendation of the Board............................ 16
Reasons for the Royal Board's Favorable
Recommendation........................................ 16
Opinion of NatCity Investments......................... 18
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger............. 25
Governmental and Regulatory Matters.................... 27
Material Federal Income Tax Consequences of the
Merger................................................ 27
Recent Litigation and Other Developments............... 28
Dissenters' Rights of Royal Shareholders............... 28
Certain Relationships with TechTronic or the Company... 29
Fees and Expenses...................................... 30
Delisting and Deregistration of Shares................. 30
TECHTRONIC SHAREHOLDERS' APPROVAL........................... 30
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA.......................... 30
THE MERGER AGREEMENT........................................ 33
The Merger............................................. 33
Effective Time......................................... 33
Merger Consideration................................... 33
Payment Procedures..................................... 33
Stock Options and Phantom Stock Rights................. 33
No Further Ownership Rights in the Company............. 34
Directors and Officers................................. 34
i
PAGE
----
Representations and Warranties......................... 34
Conduct of the Company's Business Prior to the
Merger................................................ 35
Preparation of Proxy Statement......................... 36
Non-Solicitation....................................... 37
Confidentiality; Public Announcement................... 38
Access to Information.................................. 38
Agreement to Use Reasonable Commercial Efforts......... 38
Notification of Certain Matters........................ 38
Indemnification and Insurance.......................... 38
Closing Deliveries..................................... 39
Closing Conditions..................................... 39
Termination; Termination Fee........................... 40
Source and Amount of Funds............................. 41
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF ROYAL SHARES........................ 41
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners........ 41
Security Ownership of Management....................... 42
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION...................................... 43
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS... 44
OTHER MATTERS............................................... 44
ANNEX A Merger Agreement
ANNEX B Opinion of NatCity Investments, Inc.
ANNEX C Sections 1701.84 and 1701.85 of the Ohio Revised
Code -- Rights of Dissenting Shareholders
ANNEX D Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31,
2001
ANNEX E Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended
September 30, 2002
ii
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
7005 COCHRAN ROAD
GLENWILLOW, OHIO
---------------------
PROXY STATEMENT
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
---------------------
SUMMARY
This summary highlights important selected information contained in this
proxy statement relating to the proposed merger of TIC Acquisition Corp., an
Ohio corporation ("Merger Sub"), with and into Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. ("Royal"
or the "Company"). Merger Sub is a wholly owned subsidiary of RAMC Holdings,
Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Acquiror"), which is itself a wholly owned
subsidiary of TechTronic Industries Co., Ltd., a Hong Kong corporation
("TechTronic").
This summary does not contain all of the information that may be important
to you as a Royal shareholder and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the information contained elsewhere in, or incorporated by reference into, this
proxy statement. To more fully understand the proposed merger and for a more
complete description of the legal terms of the merger, you should read carefully
this entire proxy statement and all of its appendices before voting. We have
included page references parenthetically to direct you to more complete
descriptions of the topics presented in this summary.
THE PARTIES
- Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
7005 Cochran Road
Glenwillow, Ohio 44139
Telephone: (440) 996-2000
Royal primarily develops, assembles, sources, and markets vacuum cleaners
and other cleaning appliances for home and commercial use under the Dirt
Devil(R) and Royal(R) brand names, as well as the Telezapper(R), a device that
helps reduce computer-dialed telemarketing calls. The Company's web site
addresses are: www.royalappliance.com, www.dirtdevil.com, and
www.telezapper.com.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE COMPANY IS INCLUDED IN THE REPORTS
THE COMPANY PERIODICALLY FILES WITH THE SEC. SEE "ADDITIONAL INFORMATION"
BEGINNING ON PAGE 43.
Based on the closing price of Royal shares on the New York Stock Exchange
on March 6, 2003 ($7.28) and the number of Royal shares outstanding on that date
(12,861,052), the Company's market capitalization was approximately $94 million.
The outstanding shares do not include 2,713,940 shares issuable upon exercise of
outstanding stock options or phantom stock rights granted under the Company's
options and phantom stock plans.
- TechTronic Industries Co., Ltd.
24/F., CDW Building
388 Castle Peak Road
Tsuen Wan, N.T., Hong Kong
Telephone: 011-852-2402-6888
Founded in 1985, TechTronic is a manufacturer and marketer of home
improvement power products, floor care appliances and electronic measuring
products. TechTronic's brands include Ryobi(R) power tools, Homelite(R) outdoor
products, and Vax(R) floor care appliances. TechTronic's web site address is:
www.tti.com.hk
- RAMC Holdings, Inc.
c/o TechTronic Industries Co., Ltd.
24/F., CDW Building
388 Castle Peak Road
Tsuen Wan, N.T., Hong Kong
Telephone: 011-852-2402-6888
1
RAMC Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary
of TechTronic, and was formed in December 2002 to be the parent of Royal after
the merger. Except for entering into the merger agreement and the transactions
it contemplates, Acquiror has not carried on any business since its
incorporation.
- TIC Acquisition Corp.
c/o TechTronic Industries Co., Ltd.
24/F., CDW Building
388 Castle Peak Road
Tsuen Wan, N.T., Hong Kong
Telephone: 011-852-2402-6888
TIC Acquisition Corp., an Ohio corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Acquiror formed in December 2002 for the sole purpose of completing the merger.
Except for entering into the merger agreement and the transactions it
contemplates, Merger Sub has not carried on any business since its
incorporation.
EFFECTS OF THE MERGER
As a result of the Merger:
- Each Royal share (other than treasury shares owned by the Company and
shares held by any shareholder who properly perfects dissenters' rights
under Ohio law) will be converted into the right to receive $7.37 in
cash.
- Unexercised options to purchase Royal shares will be converted into a
right to receive cash in the amount of $7.37 (less the applicable
exercise price) for each Royal share issuable upon exercise of these
options.
- Phantom stock awards issued by the Company will be converted into a right
to receive cash in the amount of $7.37 for each share pertaining to these
awards.
- The Company will terminate the registration of Royal shares under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the listing of Royal shares on the
New York Stock Exchange, and there will be no public market for Royal
shares.
The specific terms and conditions of the merger agreement govern the rights
and obligations of the parties. Therefore, the information in this summary and
elsewhere in this proxy statement regarding the merger agreement and the merger
is qualified in its entirety by reference to the merger agreement itself, a copy
of which is attached as ANNEX A to this proxy statement.
THE SPECIAL MEETING (PAGES 8 TO 10)
TIME, DATE, AND PLACE
The special meeting of Royal shareholders will be held at 9:00 a.m.,
Cleveland time, on April 22, 2003 at:
FORUM CONFERENCE CENTER
ONE CLEVELAND CENTER
1375 EAST NINTH STREET
CLEVELAND, OHIO
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE SPECIAL MEETING? (PAGE 8)
At the special meeting, you will consider whether to adopt the Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated December 16, 2002 by and among the Company, TechTronic,
Acquiror and Merger Sub (the "Merger Agreement"), which is attached to this
proxy statement as ANNEX A. Adopting the Merger Agreement at the special meeting
would result in the merger of Merger Sub into the Company, with the Company
becoming an indirectly wholly owned subsidiary of TechTronic. In addition, each
Royal share would be converted into the right to receive $7.37 per share when
the merger closed.
If any other matters are properly brought before the special meeting,
including adjourning the meeting in order to solicit more votes, you may also
authorize the persons named on the enclosed proxy card to vote according to
their discretion.
2
RECORD DATE, SHARES ENTITLED TO VOTE, AND VOTING METHODS (PAGES 8 TO 10)
You have one vote for each Royal share that you owned on the close of
business on February 28, 2003, the record date for the special meeting. On that
date, 12,861,052 Royal shares were outstanding and entitled to vote, of which a
total of 4,594,842 shares were held by the Company's directors and executive
officers. Two shareholders who beneficially own approximately 31% of the
outstanding shares have executed a voting agreement requiring them to vote in
favor of adopting the Merger Agreement as long as the Board of Directors of the
Company (the "Royal Board") continues to support the merger.
You may choose one of the following ways to cast your vote:
- by completing the accompanying proxy card and returning it in the
enclosed envelope; or
- by appearing and voting in person at the special meeting.
If your shares are held in "street name," which means that your shares are
held in the name of a bank, broker or other financial institution instead of in
your own name, you must either direct the financial institution as to how to
vote your shares or obtain a proxy from the financial institution to vote at the
special meeting.
If you plan to attend the special meeting and wish to vote in person, we
will give you a ballot when you arrive. If your shares are held in "street
name," you must bring an account statement or letter from the brokerage firm or
bank showing that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on the record date
in order to be admitted to the meeting. If you want to vote shares that are not
in your name at the special meeting, you must present a "legal proxy" from the
holder of record.
Approximately 135,000 Royal shares are held for the benefit of plan
participants of the Company's 401(k) plan. This plan contains pass-through
voting provisions for its participants, so the trustees of the plan vote Royal
shares that are allocated to each participant's account according to the
instructions of that participant. Information relating to voting by participants
in this plan is set forth in the section entitled "The Special Meeting -- Plan
Voting" beginning on page .
QUORUM AT THE SPECIAL MEETING (PAGE 8)
A quorum must be present in order to transact business at the special
meeting, so a majority of the outstanding Royal shares must be present in person
or represented by proxy. If you submit a properly executed proxy card, you
shares will be counted for purposes of calculating whether a quorum is present,
even if you abstain from voting.
EFFECT OF ABSTENTIONS AND BROKER NON-VOTES
Both abstentions and "broker non-votes" will be counted in determining
whether a quorum is present at the special meeting. Since adoption of the Merger
Agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the
outstanding Royal shares, abstentions and "broker non-votes" are effectively
counted as votes against the Merger Agreement.
IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT ALL ROYAL SHAREHOLDERS VOTE THEIR SHARES, SO
PLEASE COMPLETE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD TODAY!
VOTE REQUIRED TO ADOPT THE MERGER AGREEMENT (PAGE 9)
For the merger to be approved, the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding
Royal shares must affirmatively vote to adopt the Merger Agreement.
CHANGING A VOTE AFTER SENDING IN PROXY CARD (PAGE 9)
You may change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted. If you are
a shareholder "of record," meaning your shares are registered in your name, you
may revoke a proxy by:
- sending another signed proxy card with a later date to the address
indicated on the proxy card; or
- sending a letter revoking your proxy to the Company's corporate
secretary; or
3
- attending the special meeting, notifying the inspector of elections that
your proxy is revoked, and voting in person.
A "beneficial holder" whose shares are registered in another name (for
example, in "street name") must follow the procedures required by the holder of
record, which is usually a brokerage firm or bank, to revoke a proxy. If you are
a beneficial holder, contact the holder of record of your shares directly for
more information on these procedures.
SHARE CERTIFICATES (PAGE 9)
At this time, please do not send your share certificates to the Company or
anyone else with regard to the merger. If the merger is completed, you will
receive written instructions explaining how to exchange your Royal share
certificates for cash.
CONTACTS TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS
If you have any questions about the Special Meeting or your ownership of
Royal shares, please contact our proxy solicitor, Morrow & Co., by telephone at
(212) 754-8000.
If you have any questions about the Merger and the related transactions,
please write to:
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
Corporate Secretary
7005 Cochran Road
Glenwillow, Ohio 44139
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RECOMMENDATION (PAGE 16)
The Royal Board evaluated the fairness and advisability of the Merger
Agreement and the merger. The Royal Board unanimously approved the Merger
Agreement and recommends that you vote for its adoption based on all the factors
it considered.
THE ROYAL BOARD BELIEVES THAT THE TERMS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT ARE FAIR TO
AND IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF ROYAL SHAREHOLDERS. THE ROYAL BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT
ROYAL SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR ADOPTING THE MERGER AGREEMENT AND APPROVING THE
MERGER.
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS' VOTING AGREEMENT
John P. Rochon and E. Patrick Nalley, the two largest beneficial owners of
Royal shares, are currently members of the Royal Board and beneficially own
approximately 31% of Royal's outstanding stock. As directors, they voted to
approve the Merger Agreement. Mr. Rochon, on behalf of Richmont Capital Partners
I, L.P. ("Richmont Capital"), and Mr. Nalley have entered into voting agreements
with TechTronic. Under the voting agreements, Richmont Capital and Mr. Nalley
agreed to vote their shares in favor of adopting the Merger Agreement. They also
agreed to vote against any action that would cause a breach of the merger
agreement. The voting agreement terminates if the Merger Agreement terminates in
accordance with its terms or on May 15, 2003 if the merger has not occurred by
that date.
OPINION OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISER (PAGES 18 TO 25)
The Royal Board considered the opinion of NatCity Investments, Inc.
("NatCity Investments") dated December 9, 2002, which was that as of that date
the consideration to be received by Royal shareholders pursuant to the Merger
Agreement was fair to Royal shareholders from a financial point of view. The
written opinion is attached as ANNEX B to this proxy statement and is based on
and subject to the assumptions, qualifications, and limitations described in the
opinion. You are urged to, and should, read the NatCity Investments opinion in
its entirety. The opinion is not a recommendation regarding how any Royal
shareholder should vote at the special meeting or any other action any Royal
shareholder should take regarding the merger.
4
INTERESTS OF ROYAL DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS IN THE TRANSACTION (PAGES 25 TO 27)
In considering the recommendation of the Royal Board in favor of the
merger, you should be aware that certain directors and executive officers of the
Company may have interests in the merger that are different from, or are in
addition to, the interests of Royal shareholders generally, including those
listed below:
- Fourteen officers of the Company, including the four executive officers,
are party to severance and employment agreements that are designed to
retain the executives and provide for continuity of management in the
event of any actual or threatened change in the control of the Company.
In exchange for the officers' agreement to terminate their existing
agreements and enter into new agreements with the Company, these fourteen
officers will receive payments totaling $2.4 million upon consummation of
the merger and, based on achieving certain levels of profitability in
2003, could earn an additional $3.5 million.
- Options to purchase Royal shares and phantom stock awards that are
outstanding but unvested before the merger will accelerate and vest when
the merger becomes effective. As of February 28, 2003 the current
directors and executive officers of the Company held options and awards
whose vesting will accelerate and that had a value of $3,136,325 (based
on $7.37 per share less the applicable exercise price, in the case of
options) before deducting withholding for taxes.
TAX CONSEQUENCES (PAGES 27 AND 28)
The receipt of cash by Royal shareholders in exchange for their shares will
be a taxable event for U.S. income tax purposes under the Internal Revenue Code
and may be a taxable event for foreign, state and local income tax purposes as
well. Shareholders will recognize gain or loss for U.S. income tax purposes that
is measured by the difference between the amount of cash they receive and their
tax basis in the Royal shares exchanged. You should consult your own tax
advisors regarding the tax consequences of the merger particular to you.
THE MERGER AGREEMENT (PAGES 33 TO 41 AND ANNEX A)
CONDITIONS TO THE CLOSING OF THE MERGER (PAGES 39 AND 40)
Before we can complete the merger, a number of conditions must be satisfied
or waived. These conditions include, but are not limited to:
- the adoption of the Merger Agreement by Royal shareholders and approval
of the merger by TechTronic shareholders;
- since the date of the Merger Agreement, the absence of any change,
effect, event, occurrence or state of facts that is, has had or is
reasonably likely to have a material and adverse effect on the business,
financial condition, results of operations, or prospects of the Company
and its subsidiaries taken as a whole, other than any change, effect,
event, or occurrence (i) relating to the economy or capital or securities
markets of the United States or any other region in general, (ii)
resulting from entering into, the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by, or the announcement of the Merger Agreement, or (iii)
relating to its business, financial condition or results of operations
that has been disclosed in writing to the other party prior to the date
of the Merger Agreement (which are referred to in the Merger Agreement as
a "Material Adverse Change" or "Material Adverse Effect").
- the accuracy in all material respects, as of the date the merger closes,
of the representations and warranties made by each party, and each
party's compliance with its covenants in the Merger Agreement;
- the absence of any effective judgment, order, decree, statute, law,
ordinance, rule or regulation entered, enacted, promulgated, enforced, or
issued by any court or other governmental entity of competent
jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition (collectively
referred to in the Merger Agreement as "Restraints") affecting or seeking
to prohibit the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement;
- the deposit with the Escrow Agent of funds equal to the aggregate sum due
all shareholders and all holders of options for Royal shares and phantom
stock awards and payment of an aggregate amount of $2.4 million to
officers of the Company whose existing employment and severance
agreements will be replaced with new agreements; and
5
- the holders of fewer than 10% of the outstanding Royal shares elect to
exercise their dissenters' rights.
We expect to consummate the merger as promptly as practicable after all of
the conditions to the merger have been satisfied or waived.
TERMINATING THE MERGER AGREEMENT (PAGES 40 AND 41)
The Merger Agreement may be terminated at any time before the merger
closes, whether before or after Royal shareholders have adopted it, in any of
the following cases:
(1) by mutual written consent of TechTronic and the Company;
(2) by TechTronic, if the Company has materially breached any
representation, warranty or covenant contained in the Merger Agreement
that would have a material adverse effect on the Company and the breach
cannot be timely cured;
(3) by the Company, if TechTronic has materially breached any
representation, warranty or covenant contained in the Merger Agreement
and the breach cannot be timely cured;
(4) by either the Company or TechTronic if (i) the merger is not
consummated by May 15, 2003, (ii) Royal shareholders do not adopt the
Merger Agreement, (iii) TechTronic shareholders do not adopt the merger
agreement at their meeting, or (iv) any Restraint is in effect and
final;
(5) by the Company upon entering into a binding agreement concerning a
Superior Proposal, as defined in the Merger Agreement (see "The Merger
Agreement -- Non-Solicitation" on page 37 of this proxy statement),
provided that the Company complied with the applicable provisions of
the Merger Agreement, including providing notice of the proposal to
TechTronic and paying TechTronic a termination fee of $5,300,000 plus
reimbursing up to $700,000 of TechTronic's reasonable out-of-pocket
fees and expenses incurred in connection with the merger;
(6) by the Company, if anything occurs or exists that would, or would be
reasonably likely to, cause or give rise to the failure of any of the
conditions to the obligations of TechTronic and that cannot be timely
cured;
(7) by TechTronic if anything occurs or exists that would, or would be
reasonably likely to, cause or give rise to the failure of any of the
conditions to the obligations of the Company and that cannot be timely
cured; and
(8) By TechTronic if (i) a third party commences an exchange offer or
tender offer for ownership or control of 50% or more of the Royal
shares, and the Royal Board fails to recommend against accepting this
offer, (ii) the Company or any of its subsidiaries authorizes,
recommends, proposes or publicly announces an agreement with a third
party regarding either a merger or the disposal of 20% or more of the
consolidated assets or 10% or more of the voting power of the Company,
(iii) a third party acquires beneficial ownership or the right to
acquire beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Royal shares, under
certain conditions, or (iv) the Royal Board withdraws or adversely
modifies its approval of the merger.
TERMINATION FEES AND EXPENSES IF THE MERGER IS NOT COMPLETED (PAGE 41)
TechTronic will be entitled to receive a termination fee in an amount equal
to $5,300,000 plus reimbursement of up to $700,000 of all reasonable
out-of-pocket fees and expenses incurred by TechTronic, if the Merger Agreement
is terminated for any of the reasons stated in items 5 or 8 above.
NO SOLICITATION (PAGES 37 TO 38)
Non-solicitation provisions in the Merger Agreement prohibit the Company
from soliciting a competing proposal to acquire all or a substantial part of the
Company, but the Company may respond under certain circumstances set forth in
the Merger Agreement if it receives a proposal for a transaction from a third
party.
6
DISSENTERS' RIGHTS (PAGES 28 AND 29)
If the merger is consummated, Royal shareholders will have certain rights
under the Ohio Revised Code to dissent and demand dissenters' rights and to
receive payment of the fair cash value of their Royal shares. Dissenting
shareholders may not vote in favor of adopting the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the merger, as part
of perfecting dissenters' rights under Ohio law. Royal shareholders who perfect
dissenters' rights by complying with the procedures set forth in Sections
1701.84 and 1701.85 of the Ohio Revised Code will have the fair cash value of
their Royal shares determined by an Ohio court and will be entitled to receive a
payment equal to the fair cash value of those shares from the corporation
surviving the merger. In addition, any dissenting Royal shareholders would be
entitled to receive payment of a fair rate of interest determined by the trial
court on what the court determines to be the fair cash value of their Royal
shares. In determining the fair cash value of Royal shares, the court is
required to take into account all relevant factors, excluding any appreciation
or depreciation in market value resulting from the merger. Accordingly, the
court's determination could be based upon considerations other than, or in
addition to, the market value of Royal shares, including, among other things,
asset values and earning capacity. Royal shares held by any person who wants to
dissent but fails to perfect or who effectively withdraws or loses the right to
dissent under Section 1701.85 of the Ohio Revised Code will be converted into,
as of the effective time (as defined in the Merger Agreement), the right to
receive the consideration offered to Royal shareholders according to the terms
of the Merger Agreement. Copies of Sections 1701.84 and 1701.85 of the Ohio
Revised Code are attached as ANNEX C to this proxy statement.
7
PRICE RANGE OF SHARES; DIVIDENDS
As of February 28, 2003, there were approximately 820 shareholders of
record and approximately 3400 beneficial owners of Royal shares. The following
table sets forth the closing high and low prices for Royal shares for the
periods indicated and is derived from data prepared by the New York Stock
Exchange.
2002 2001
----------- -----------
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
---- ---- ---- ----
First Quarter.............................................. 5.70 4.65 4.60 4.00
Second Quarter............................................. 7.13 5.40 6.08 3.20
Third Quarter.............................................. 6.40 3.90 6.55 3.75
Fourth Quarter............................................. 7.27 3.55 5.55 4.05
On December 16, 2002, the last full trading day prior to the announcement
of the Merger the last sale price per Royal share reported by the New York Stock
Exchange was $5.98.
The Company has historically not paid dividends on its shares.
Shareholders should obtain current market quotations for Royal shares
before making any decision regarding the Merger or the other matters described
in this proxy statement.
In April 2001, the Royal Board authorized a Royal share repurchase program
that provided for the Company to purchase up to 3,400,000 of its outstanding
common shares in the open market and through negotiated transactions. The
Company repurchased a total of approximately 1,322,000 shares for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $6,900,000 under the program. The last shares
purchased under this program were acquired on August 6, 2002. In the Merger
Agreement, the Company agreed to suspend the program, and the program expired on
December 31, 2002.
THE SPECIAL MEETING
This proxy statement is being furnished in connection with the solicitation
of proxies from the holders of Royal shares by the Royal Board. The Royal Board
is soliciting your proxy with respect to the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger, and any other matters
to be voted upon at the special meeting, including the right to postpone or
adjourn the special meeting to solicit additional votes. We mailed this proxy
statement to holders of Royal shares beginning March 14, 2003. You should read
this proxy statement carefully before voting your shares.
WHERE AND WHEN THE SPECIAL MEETING WILL BE HELD
The Special Meeting will be held at The Forum Conference Center, One
Cleveland Center, 1375 East Ninth Street, Cleveland, Ohio, on April 22, 2003,
starting at 9:00 a.m. local time.
WHAT WILL BE VOTED UPON
At the Special Meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon the
following items:
- to adopt the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the Merger;
- other business as may properly come before the Special Meeting.
REQUIRED VOTES
The Royal Board has fixed the close of business on February 28, 2003 as the
record date (the "Record Date") for the determination of shareholders who are
entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting of shareholders or
any adjournment thereof. On the Record Date, there were issued and outstanding
12,861,052 Royal shares.
The presence at the Special Meeting, in person or by proxy, of a majority
of Royal shares outstanding on the Record Date will constitute a quorum for the
conduct of business. Each Royal share entitles the holder thereof to cast one
vote on the matters to be voted upon at the Special Meeting.
8
For the Merger to occur, the Merger Agreement must receive the affirmative
vote of the holders of two-thirds of Royal shares outstanding on the Record
Date.
Messrs. Rochon and Nalley, the two largest beneficial owners of Royal
shares, are currently members of the Royal Board and beneficially own
approximately 31% of Royal's outstanding stock. They have approved the Merger
Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Merger. Mr.
Rochon, on behalf of Richmont Capital, and Mr. Nalley have entered into voting
agreements with TechTronic. Under the voting agreements, Richmont Capital and
Mr. Nalley agreed to vote their shares in favor of adopting the Merger
Agreement. They also agreed to vote against any action that would cause a breach
of the Merger Agreement. The voting agreement terminates upon termination of the
Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms or on May 15, 2003 if the Merger
has not occurred by that date.
VOTING SHARES BY PROXY
When you return your proxy card you are giving your "proxy" to the
individuals we have designated in the proxy to vote your shares as you direct at
the meeting. If you sign the proxy card but do not make specific choices, these
individuals will vote your shares for adopting the Merger Agreement, as
recommended by the Royal Board. If any matter not specifically listed in the
notice of Special Meeting is presented at the Special Meeting, they will vote
your shares in accordance with their best judgment. On the date this proxy
statement was mailed to Royal shareholders, we knew of no matters that needed to
be acted on at the meeting other than those discussed in this proxy statement.
When a shareholder has specified a choice on his or her proxy with respect to
the Merger Agreement or other proposals or matters, that direction will be
followed. If no direction is given, all Royal shares represented by the proxy
will be voted for adopting the Merger Agreement or at the discretion of the
proxy holder in respect of other proposals or matters.
A proxy may be revoked at any time before it is exercised. For a
shareholder "of record" (meaning one whose shares are registered in his or her
own name) to revoke a proxy, the shareholder may either:
- send in another signed proxy card with a later date; or
- send a letter revoking the shareholder's proxy to our corporate secretary
at the Company's address: Royal Appliance Mfg. Co., 7005 Cochran Road,
Glenwillow, Ohio 44139; or
- attend the Special Meeting, notify us that the shareholder is revoking
his, her, or its proxy, and vote in person.
A "beneficial holder" whose shares are registered in another name (for
example in "street name") must follow the procedures required by the holder of
record, which is usually a brokerage firm or bank, to revoke a proxy. A
beneficial holder should contact the holder of record directly for more
information on these procedures.
If you do not provide your broker with instructions on how to vote your
"street name" shares, your broker will not be able to vote them on the Merger
Agreement, which will have the effect of voting against the Merger. You should
therefore instruct your broker how to vote your shares, following the directions
provided by your broker.
Shareholders who attend the Special Meeting and wish to vote in person will
be given a ballot at the meeting. If your shares are held in street name or are
otherwise not registered in name, and you want to attend the meeting, you must
either direct the financial institution as to how to vote your shares or obtain
a proxy from the financial institution to vote at the Special Meeting.
DISSENTING HOLDERS
Ohio law entitles shareholders who do not vote in favor of adopting the
Merger Agreement to demand a judicial appraisal of the fair value of their
shares. If you do not vote in favor of adopting the Merger Agreement and if you
follow the procedures set forth in ANNEX C, you may become a dissenting holder.
Failure to follow these procedures precisely will result in a loss of
dissenters' rights.
EXCHANGING SHARE CERTIFICATES
Holders of Royal shares should not send in their share certificates with
the proxy cards. If the Merger is completed, you will receive written
instructions for exchanging your share certificates for cash.
9
PLAN VOTING
Approximately 135,000 Royal shares are held for the benefit of plan
participants of the Company's 401(k) plan for employees (the "Plan"). The Plan
provides pass-through voting for its participants, so the trustees of the Plan
will vote Royal shares allocated to a plan participant's account in accordance
with the instructions of the plan participant.
Plan participants can vote Royal shares held in the Plan on their behalf
only by instructing the trustee on a trustee's voting instruction card provided
to participants for that purpose.
Any voting instructions given by a plan participant may be revoked at any
time prior to the deadline described below by which the Plan's voting
instructions must be received, by either:
- delivering a written notice bearing a date later than the date of the
first voting instruction card to the Plan trustee at the indicated
address; or
- signing and delivering a voting instruction card relating to the same
shares and bearing a later date than the date of the previous voting
instruction card.
In order to permit sufficient time to tabulate voting instruction cards, a
Plan participant's instructions must be received no later than April 21, 2003.
PROXY SOLICITATION; SOLICITATION COSTS
In addition to this mailing, directors and employees of the Company may
solicit proxies personally, electronically or by telephone, none of whom will
receive additional compensation for this solicitation.
The Company has requested banks, brokerage houses and other custodians,
nominees and fiduciaries to forward the Company's proxy solicitation materials
to the beneficial owners of Royal shares they hold of record. The Company will
reimburse these record holders for customary clerical and mailing expenses
incurred in forwarding these materials to their customers.
The Company has retained Morrow & Co., for proxy solicitation and
information agent services in connection with the Special Meeting. Morrow & Co.
will receive a fee of approximately $6,500 for its services and reimbursement of
out-of-pocket expenses in connection therewith. The Company also has agreed to
indemnify Morrow & Co. against certain liabilities arising out of or in
connection with the engagement. Morrow & Co. will solicit proxies from
individuals, brokers, banks, bank nominees and other institutional holders.
SPECIAL FACTORS
BACKGROUND OF THE MERGER
The Royal Board has periodically explored and assessed strategic options,
in response to outside inquiries and in light of the increasingly competitive
floor care industry, with the objective of enhancing shareholder value. In that
regard, the Company, in March 1999, hired an investment advisor for the purposes
of (i) responding to outside inquiries and conducting a limited solicitation of
other potential foreign and domestic, financial and strategic purchasers; (ii)
conducting a preliminary valuation of the Company; and, if necessary, (iii)
providing a fairness opinion with respect to possible offers.
It was during this 1999 process that TechTronic, one of the Company's
largest suppliers, as well as numerous other parties, including another
supplier, were initially contacted with respect to a possible transaction with
the Company. At that time, TechTronic elected not to participate in discussions
with respect to the purchase of the Company. In July 1999, the Company
terminated its exploration process, having failed to obtain a firm,
fully-financed offer that the Board believed reflected the full value of the
Company.
In the fall of 1999, management of Royal met with TechTronic
representatives in Hong Kong to discuss current and future product supply
projects. Management of the Company also met with other Asian suppliers.
In June 2000, John Rochon, a Company director and President of J.R.
Investment Corp., the General Partner of Richmont Capital, the owner at that
time of 19.8% of Royal, met with Horst Pudwill, Chief Executive Officer of
TechTronic, and Henry Sweetbaum, a TechTronic consultant, with respect to
Richmont's long-term intention
10
for its investment in Royal. On August 8, 2000, Richmont amended its Schedule
13D filing to note that "based on current market conditions and the position of
the Company, it would not consider selling its shares of the Company's Common
Stock at a price less than "low double digits."
In November 2000, management of Royal again traveled to Hong Kong and met
with several suppliers, including TechTronic, regarding product supply projects.
Subsequent to the extensive review of strategic options in 1999, the
Company has periodically been approached by, or initiated contact with, several
outside parties who expressed, or which the Company believed had, varying
degrees of interest in acquiring Royal or a significant stock position in Royal.
Some of these discussions included due diligence sessions. None of these
discussions, however, progressed to the submission of an offer, due to internal
business issues at the prospective bidders, their respective financing capacity,
a tight credit market, especially in the high yield debt market after 1999, and
the Company's desire for an "all cash" deal with no financing contingencies.
In late November 2001, one of Royal's global suppliers contacted Mr.
Merriman about seeking more business and a desire for a closer working
relationship that might lead to a possible combination down the road. Mr.
Merriman responded that the supplier's costs and quality had to improve and be
more competitive and that Royal was always willing to discuss possible
combinations that would bring premium value to Royal's shareholders. In order to
keep the same competitive pressure on TechTronic, Messrs. Michael Merriman,
Richard Farone, Richard Vasek and David Brickner, the Company's executive
officers, met in Cleveland on December 13, 2001 with Horst Pudwill, David Butts,
Vice President -- Marketing and Business Development of TechTronic, and Robert
Freitag, Vice President of Sales of Ryobi North America, a subsidiary of
TechTronic. Royal's management made it known that another global supplier was
offering more competitive pricing in order to win more business and had a desire
for a closer working relationship that might lead to a possible combination down
the road. Mr. Pudwill expressed that TechTronic would be more competitive on
pricing and had the same long-term desire for a possible combination, but was
currently digesting its recent acquisitions of Homelite and Ryobi and he did not
believe that TechTronic had the financial capability to do another acquisition
at that time. He suggested that since TechTronic's Chief Financial Officer,
Frank Chan, was visiting Ryobi in South Carolina that week, that Royal
management should meet with him to discuss the then current financial markets.
On December 18, 2001, Messrs. Merriman and Vasek met with Mr. Chan and
Philippe Buisson, Ryobi North America's Chief Financial Officer, to discuss the
current financing capability of TechTronic and Ryobi. It was concluded that
TechTronic did not have sufficient borrowing capacity to make an acquisition the
size of Royal at such time. No further discussions were held with TechTronic
until August 2002.
As a follow-up to the November 2001 call, Mr. Merriman and some of Royal
senior management met in March 2002 with the senior management of the other
global supplier. It was determined that this global supplier was in the midst of
restructuring its operations from a prior acquisition, did not have the
financial capacity for a significant acquisition in 2002, and needed to continue
to improve its quality in floorcare. There have been no further discussions, due
diligence or offer from this global supplier.
On July 30, 2002, Mr. Merriman received an unsolicited overture from
another consumer products' company relating to its interest in sourcing products
to Royal and a possible combination. In order to keep competitive pressure on
TechTronic, Messrs. Merriman, Vasek, Farone and Brickner met with Messrs.
Pudwill and Butts on August 15, 2002, at which meeting Mr. Merriman advised Mr.
Pudwill of the recent inquiry. Mr. Pudwill indicated that TechTronic would be
more competitive in supplying Royal and, as a result of a recent public
offering, had the financial strength and borrowing ability to explore an
acquisition of Royal. He suggested that TechTronic would be better prepared to
discuss the issue when Mr. Merriman visited Hong Kong in mid-October to discuss
current product sourcing projects. Mr. Merriman stated that he would discuss the
matter with the Royal Board prior to his October trip.
At the beginning of September 2002, the consumer product company that had
contacted the Company in July indicated that it was not interested in having
more detailed discussions about a potential acquisition, but was still
interested in exploring product sourcing opportunities.
About the same time, a representative of NatCity Investments received an
inquiry from a potential financial buyer as to whether NatCity Investments would
present to Royal its interest in pursuing a possible transaction with Royal.
Management of the Company, after consulting with several directors of the
Company, authorized NatCity Investments to continue contacts with the potential
buyer and also to advise TechTronic of the inquiry.
11
The representative of NatCity Investments who received the inquiry was
previously associated with the investment bank hired by the Company in 1999 and
had personally conducted the prior evaluation process on behalf of such firm.
Additionally, NatCity Investments contacted a consumer products company
that had earlier expressed an interest to determine whether it had any interest
at this time. Such entity expressed no current interest.
A confidentiality agreement was signed by the potential financial buyer on
September 10, 2002; a second confidentiality agreement was signed by David
Butts, on behalf of TechTronic, on October 2, 2002.
In light of these inquiries and the current discussions, at the regularly
scheduled October 14, 2002 Royal Board meeting the Company engaged NatCity
Investments to assist the Company in exploring a potential combination with
TechTronic, the financial buyer who had expressed an interest in September 2002,
and other possible buyers. At this meeting, Mr. Merriman advised the Royal Board
that he served on the board of National City Bank, an affiliate of NatCity
Investments. As a consequence, he abstained from voting on the engagement of
NatCity Investments. Also at this meeting, a representative of Kahn Kleinman,
the Company's legal counsel, reviewed a memorandum previously distributed to the
directors outlining the authority of directors, the duty of care and the duty of
loyalty expected of directors, the ability of the board to rely on appropriate
third parties, the application and basis of the business judgment rule, and the
directors' fiduciary obligation to the corporation, its shareholders, and other
constituencies.
The Royal Board discussed alternative processes ranging from a full auction
process to a more selective, limited process. The Board concluded that because
the Company and its investment banker had explored a range of buyers extensively
in 1999, and informally and selectively, over the prior three years, a full
auction process was both unnecessary and potentially detrimental to the Company,
due in part to the creation of uncertainty for the Company's employees,
customers, and suppliers. Because of the need for certainty in any transaction,
the Royal Board concluded that the Company's objectives of confidentiality and
certainty could be met if a potential buyer executed a definitive merger
agreement that (i) had no financial or other contingencies, other than routine
closing conditions, and (ii) contained a "fiduciary-out" provision with an
acceptable break-up fee. Such an approach would provide a "market check,"
allowing any other person to make an offer during the several months that would
naturally occur between the public announcement of a definitive agreement and
the shareholder vote.
On October 17, 2002, Mr. Merriman met in Hong Kong with Mr. Pudwill to
discuss TechTronic's interest in Royal. Mr. Merriman discussed Royal's current
financial projections for 2002 and 2003 that had been given to NatCity
Investments and the other potential financial buyer, and discussed possible
operating synergies, including utilizing available manufacturing capacity,
utilizing available engineering and product development resources of TechTronic,
and seeking economies in shipping and logistics with other TechTronic product
lines. The Company's actual results for 2002 as reported on February 13, 2003,
approximated the 2002 projections provided to TechTronic and the other financial
buyer. Management projected that 2003 net sales would increase to $421 million,
as compared to 2002 net sales of $390 million, gross margin percentages would
increase to 24.9%, earnings before interest and taxes would increase to $29.7
million or approximately 7% of net sales, and net income would increase to $18
million.
The forecasts provided to NatCity Investments and Techtronic were prepared
by Royal's management in October 2002 in connection with the proposed sale of
the Company. In general, management's internal financial forecasts are prepared
for internal use and not with a view towards public disclosure. The forecasts
were not prepared with a view towards compliance with published guidelines of
the SEC or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of prospective financial
information. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP neither examined nor compiled the
forecasts and, accordingly, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP did not and does not
express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. The
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP report incorporated by reference into this Proxy
Statement relates to the Company's historical financial information; such report
does not extend to the forecasts and should not be read to do so. The forecasts
are subjective in many respects, based on assumptions made by management with
respect to both Company and industry performance, and general business, market
and financial conditions, many of which are beyond Royal's control. Accordingly,
Royal can not offer any assurance that the assumptions made in preparing the
forecasts will prove accurate, and actual results may be materially greater or
less than those contained in the forecasts. Therefore, this information should
not be relied upon as being necessarily indicative of future results, and you
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the prospective financial
information. Except to the extent required under federal securities laws, Royal
does not intend to make publicly available any update
12
or other revisions to the forecasts to reflect circumstances existing after the
date of the preparation of the forecasts. See "Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward Looking Statements" on page 44 of this Proxy Statement.
On October 18, 2002, the Royal Board held a special telephonic meeting at
which Mr. Merriman updated the Royal Board on his discussions with Mr. Pudwill.
At this meeting, NatCity Investments furnished the Royal Board with a
preliminary financial presentation regarding the Company. NatCity Investments
also advised the Royal Board of recent communications with potential bidders,
including TechTronic.
On October 19, 2002, Messrs. Merriman and Brickner met with Messrs. Pudwill
and Butts. Mr. Pudwill advised Messrs. Merriman and Brickner that at the
previous day's TechTronic's board meeting, the TechTronic board had authorized
him to proceed with legal, accounting and other necessary due diligence in order
to make a cash offer for Royal. Mr. Merriman requested Mr. Pudwill to instruct
his negotiating team to work through NatCity Investments.
At the October 28, 2002 special meeting of the Royal Board, NatCity
Investments advised the Royal Board of the status of negotiations with
TechTronic and the financial buyer. NatCity Investments also advised the Board
that a third potential bidder was interested in taking a larger equity stake in
the Company but was not interested in making an offer to all of the Company's
shareholders. The Royal Board appointed a negotiating committee of Messrs. Jack
Kahl, E. Patrick Nalley and R. Louis Schneeberger to oversee the negotiation
process and minimize potential conflicts of interests that management may have
had. The Royal Board further authorized Royal's counsel to distribute an initial
draft of a merger agreement to TechTronic and to the financial buyer.
During the period October 31, 2002 through November 2, 2002, TechTronic's
legal advisors and accounting consultants reviewed confidential materials in an
off-site data room established by Royal. On November 1, 2002, Royal's senior
management met with TechTronic's representatives and responded to various due
diligence questions.
During the period from October 30, 2002 through December 12, 2002, Royal
and TechTronic, working together with their respective legal and financial
advisors, negotiated the terms of the definitive merger agreement, other than
the price terms, the amount of any "break-up fee" and reimbursement of buyer's
expenses, and the circumstances under which such fees and expenses would be
payable. During the negotiations, it was agreed that Royal's two principal
shareholders, Richmont Capital and E. Patrick Nalley, which in the aggregate
held approximately 31% of the outstanding shares of the Company, would agree to
vote in favor of the transaction if it were recommended by the Royal Board.
Accordingly, drafts of a proposed voting agreement with these parties were
circulated to TechTronic and these two principal shareholders and terms
finalized.
During November, one of the corporations that had participated in the 1999
process called NatCity Investments to express renewed interest in acquiring the
Company. NatCity Investments responded that Royal would furnish confidential
information to such entity, upon its receipt of evidence that the potential
bidder could finance an acquisition the size of Royal. The potential bidder
failed to provide such assurance, and no further discussion occurred with such
party.
On November 18, 2002, Mr. Sweetbaum called Mr. Merriman and advised him
that TechTronic was prepared to bid $92.8 million for the equity of Royal.
TechTronic conditioned its bid on the conditions that all severance agreements
relating to Royal employees be reduced to six months. Taking into account shares
issuable for outstanding stock options and phantom stock awards, the per share
bid was approximately $6.56 per share. Mr. Merriman advised Mr. Sweetbaum to
communicate the offer to NatCity Investments, which he did.
On November 19, 2002, Mr. Sweetbaum spoke to a representative of NatCity
Investments, who advised Mr. Sweetbaum that TechTronic's offer was inadequate.
After further conversations, Mr. Sweetbaum increased the offer by $8 million, to
an aggregate of $100.8 million, or effectively $7.07 per share. NatCity
Investments indicated it would take the offer to the Board's negotiating
committee.
A conference call was held on November 21, 2002 among NatCity Investments,
the Royal Board's negotiating committee and legal counsel. NatCity Investments
advised the Committee that the previously discussed financial buyer had elected
to suspend its negotiations pending a review of Royal's year-end results.
NatCity Investments also reviewed TechTronic's proposal. The Committee
authorized Mr. Merriman to call TechTronic's Chairman directly and determine
whether a higher bid was possible, as the current proposal of approximately
$7.07 per share was inadequate. The Committee also advised Mr. Merriman and the
officers to
13
obtain their own independent counsel to negotiate any new employment agreements
or changes to their existing severance agreements, so as to avoid any conflict
of interest.
On November 21, 2002, Mr. Merriman called Mr. Pudwill to discuss a higher
offer so that negotiations could proceed. Mr. Pudwill indicated that TechTronic
was willing to increase its offer, but only if Royal management would agree to
new employment agreements with a negotiated lump sum payment up front and a
reduced severance period of six months. Mr. Pudwill advised Mr. Merriman that
TechTronic's Board would decide on a final offer at its board meeting on
November 26-27, 2002.
On November 23-24, 2002, Mr. Merriman held discussions with Mr. Sweetbaum
and advised him that, were TechTronic to increase its offer to a level
acceptable to Royal's Board, (i) senior management was prepared to accept new
employment agreements providing six months severance in exchange for lump-sum
payments at closing equal to one-half of the three years of severance payment
due under the current contracts, (ii) he was prepared to recommend similar terms
to the other Royal employees with severance agreements, but (iii) the Company's
Change in Control Severance Compensation Plan covering the rank and file
employees would not be changed to reduce employee benefits post-merger.
On November 29, 2002, Mr. Sweetbaum advised Mr. Merriman that TechTronic's
board of directors had approved a proposal of (i) $7.37 for each outstanding
share, including shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and
pursuant to phantom stock awards (an aggregate purchase price of $105.5 million
for Royal's equity), (ii) an aggregate payment of $2.4 million to be divided
among the Royal's fourteen senior management employees with severance
agreements, provided that they agree to new employment agreements that included
only six months severance, (iii) up to an additional $3.5 million to such senior
management employees if Royal's 2003 earnings before income taxes, depreciation
and amortization ("EBITDA") exceeded $30 million from sales of products other
than Telezapper and $35 million overall, and (iv) no change was necessary to the
Company's Change in Control Severance Compensation Plan other than to ensure
that the plan terminated three years after the Closing of the Merger. Mr.
Sweetbaum also indicated that TechTronic stock options would be made available
to Royal's management, the amount and terms of which would be finalized during
Mr. Pudwill's trip to Ryobi's facility in South Carolina scheduled for December
10-12, 2002.
A conference call was held on December 2, 2002, among TechTronic, Royal and
their respective counsel to discuss the open items in the proposed Merger
Agreement. During the course of this call, TechTronic requested a "break-up fee"
of $10 million.
On December 2, 2002, the Royal Board met to consider the revised proposal.
Representatives of NatCity Investments summarized the negotiations that had
occurred to date with TechTronic, as well as conversations they had with
potential other bidders. Mr. Jack Kahl, a Royal Board member, indicated that he
had telephone conversations with the chief executive officer of another consumer
products company to determine whether that company had any interest in acquiring
Royal. NatCity Investments made a preliminary financial presentation setting
forth its financial analyses relating to the proposed transaction, which was
similar to its final presentation made at the December 9, 2002 meeting of the
Royal Board. Representatives of Kahn Kleinman reviewed the proposed terms of the
merger agreement and the voting agreement. The Royal Board discussed the
proposal and advised the committee on its position with respect to the open
issues, including the break-up fee and conditions to its payment, a definition
of "Material Adverse Change" that would permit TechTronic to terminate the
Agreement, and the terms of the voting agreement. The Board was also advised of
two additional open matters not requiring Board action: TechTronic's completion
of its due diligence regarding the physical condition of Royal's facilities and
TechTronic's negotiation of amendments to management's employment agreements.
Legal counsel furnished its advice on the appropriateness of break-up fees in
transactions similar to the Merger. In authorizing a break-up fee of $5.3
million, plus a maximum of $700,000 in expenses payable only if a competing
offer was received and, in general, not rejected by the Company, the Royal Board
relied on a presentation of NatCity Investments that reviewed all public company
transactions in 2001 and 2002 for which data was available, with an emphasis of
transactions with an enterprise value (included funded debt) of between $100-
$200 million. Including funded indebtedness, the estimated enterprise value of
the proposed transaction was $150 million. NatCity Investments confirmed that
the statistical average break-up fee for transactions of such size was 3.5% of
enterprise value. With respect to the definition of "Material Adverse Change,"
Royal's position was that general economic conditions and events arising as a
result of the announcement of the transaction were risks properly borne by
TechTronic. The Royal Board also insisted that the voting agreement with the
principal shareholders would terminate if the Company elected to terminate the
Merger Agreement.
14
The Royal Board's position on the open matters was communicated to
TechTronic on the evening of December 2, 2002. On December 3, 2002, TechTronic
indicated that it was prepared to accept Royal's proposals on the open contract
issues, provided that TechTronic was able to negotiate acceptable employment
agreements with Royal management and that its final due diligence items were
resolved.
On the evening of December 9, 2002, the Royal Board held a special meeting
to discuss the proposed business combination with TechTronic. Members of senior
management and representatives of the Company's advisors reviewed the activities
and discussions of the past weeks, and presented a summary of the proposed
transaction terms as reflected in the draft definitive agreements and the
strategic rationale that supported it. NatCity Investments updated the Royal
Board on their recent discussions with other potential third party bidders; Mr.
Merriman noted that further discussions with the consumer products company
identified by Mr. Kahl on December 2 had not materialized. The Board reviewed
Royal's performance and prospects and strategic alternatives, which included
remaining an independent public company, searching for other consumer products
companies to acquire, raising financing and "going private" by buying back all
of the Company's outstanding shares held by the public shareholders, or selling
the Company for cash at a premium to market to TechTronic. The Board determined
that due to a tight credit market, the Company's limited financing capacity, and
the volatile retail environment, a sale to TechTronic for cash, at a premium to
Royal's market price, was the best strategic alternative to maximize shareholder
value. Representatives of Kahn Kleinman reviewed in more detail the terms of the
proposed transaction, including the terms of the merger agreement and the
necessary changes required in the Company's Shareholder's Rights Agreement,
Change In Control Severance Compensation Plan, existing employment agreements
and other instruments, and described the Board's fiduciary duties under the
circumstances. NatCity Investments provided the Royal Board a detailed analysis
of the financial terms of the proposed combination and an oral opinion, which
was subsequently confirmed by delivery of a written opinion, dated December 9,
2002, that, as of that date and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth
in the opinion, the merger consideration was fair, from a financial point of
view, to the holders of Royal shares. Mr. Merriman then advised the Royal Board
of the contemplated terms of the employment arrangements that would be effective
upon completion of the merger. The Royal Board then discussed the proposal. At
the conclusion of this meeting, after consideration of the factors described
under "Recommendation of the Board and Reasons for the Merger" on page 16, the
Royal Board determined by a unanimous vote, that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby are fair to and in the best interests of Royal
and its shareholders, and approved the merger agreement, the amendment to the
Royal Shareholder Rights Plan, an amendment to the Change in Control Severance
Compensation Plan, the amendments to the existing executive employment
agreements, and the acceleration of the vesting of all unvested stock options
and phantom stock awards effective immediately prior to the Merger. The Royal
Board noted that its approval was still conditioned on agreement by TechTronic
and management of the final terms of the employment agreements.
On December 10, 2002, Messrs. Merriman, Farone, Vasek and Brickner met with
Mr. Pudwill and other TechTronic management in South Carolina to discuss the
employment agreements. During the period December 10-13, 2002, the final terms
of the employment agreements were negotiated.
The Royal Board held a brief telephonic meeting on December 11, 2002 at
which time it was advised of the current status of the open matters. Although an
agreement was not yet a certainty, the Royal Board requested that Mr. Rochon, on
behalf of Richmont Capital, and Mr. Nalley execute the voting agreement and
forward it to Royal's counsel to be held in escrow pending execution of the
definitive agreement.
On the morning of December 13, 2002, at a special meeting of the Royal
Board, management reported that all open issues had been resolved, that Messrs.
Merriman, Farone, Vasek and Brickner would be meeting with the other Royal
management personnel to advise them about the transaction and the need to modify
their existing agreements. Assuming that such individuals accepted the revised
terms, Royal sought to obtain signatures on both the amendments to the existing
agreements and the new employment agreements. The Royal Board was advised that
execution of the Merger Agreement would be scheduled for December 16th or 17th
following TechTronic's compliance with the regulations of the Hong Kong Stock
Exchange. NatCity Investments confirmed for the Royal Board that the increase in
the market price of Royal's common stock that had occurred over the prior week
did not materially change NatCity Investments' analysis or the basis for its
fairness opinion provided on December 9, 2002. Kahn Kleinman advised the Royal
Board of the projected timetable from execution of the definitive agreement to
closing. The Royal Board reviewed the draft of the press release.
15
On December 16, 2002, the definitive merger agreement was signed; execution
pages were exchanged and the press release issued the morning of December 17,
2002, following the close of the trading day for the Hong Kong Stock Exchange
and prior to the opening of the New York Stock Exchange.
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD
On December 9, 2002, the Royal Board unanimously approved the Merger and
the merger agreement and determined that the Merger is fair to, and in the best
interests of, Royal and its shareholders and recommended that all shareholders
adopt the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby at the
Special Meeting.
The following is a summary of the factors considered material by the Board
when making its determination: (i) the Royal Board's knowledge of the business,
operations, assets, financial condition and results of operations of Royal; (ii)
the opinion of NatCity Investments to the effect that, as of December 9, 2002,
and based on the assumptions made, matters considered and limits of the review
undertaken, as described in that opinion, the $7.37 per share consideration to
be received by holders of shares pursuant to the merger was fair, from a
financial point of view, to those holders; (iii) the lack of liquidity and float
of Royal's stock and the price of Royal's stock not being reflective of the
Royal Board's belief as to its value; (iv) the increasing legal, accounting,
insurance and other costs to a small cap company, such as Royal, of remaining a
publicly traded enterprise; and (v) that the terms of the merger agreement
permit the Royal Board properly to discharge its fiduciary duties, including
responding to inquiries and proposals from third parties interested in the
possible acquisition of Royal and providing information to, and entering into
discussions and negotiations with, such parties. Since the Special Meeting will
not occur until several months after the execution of the Merger Agreement, the
Royal Board believed that such period would be adequate to receive offers from
other parties, if any, having an interest in acquiring Royal. The Royal Board
further believes that the provisions of the merger agreement providing for a
termination fee to be paid to TechTronic in the event of, among other things, a
termination of the merger agreement due to a change in the Royal Board's
recommendation of the Merger, and the terms of the voting agreement requiring
the participating shareholders to vote their shares in favor of the merger if it
were recommended by the Royal Board, would not unreasonably discourage offers
from third parties. Other factors included the prospects of remaining
independent and the Royal Directors' belief that there was not another company
with whom Royal could effect a transaction with greater value to the
shareholders in the immediate future.
REASONS FOR THE ROYAL BOARD'S FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION
MATERIAL FACTORS
In reaching its decision to approve, and in making its recommendation that
Royal shareholders adopt, the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby, including the Merger, the Royal Board considered a number of factors,
both positive and negative, including the following material factors:
- the Royal Board's familiarity with, and presentations by NatCity
Investments regarding, the business, operations, properties and assets,
financial condition, competitive position, business strategy, and
prospects of the Company (as well as the risks involved in achieving
those prospects), the current environment for the consumer appliance
industry in which the Company competes, and current industry, economic,
and market conditions, both on an historical and on an on-going basis;
- the fact that the offer price of $7.37 per Royal share represented an
approximate 52% premium over the $4.85 per share closing price of Royal
shares on the last trading day prior to the December 9, 2002 Royal Board
meeting;
- the advice that the Royal Board received from legal counsel and NatCity
Investments in negotiating and evaluating the terms of the Merger
Agreement;
- the financial presentation made by NatCity Investments at the December 9,
2002 meeting of the Royal Board;
- the opinion of NatCity Investments dated December 9, 2002 and attached to
this proxy statement as ANNEX B, that, as of that date, the consideration
to be received by Royal shareholders pursuant to the Merger Agreement was
fair from a financial point of view to the holder of Royal shares;
16
- the current and historical market prices of Royal shares during the past
five years has not exceeded the offer price of $7.37 per share.
- the Royal Board's judgment that the current stock price does not reflect
the Company's value, in part due to the lack of liquidity and small
public float of Royal shares potentially limiting institutional investor
interest.
- the fact that the consideration offered to Royal shareholders is all
cash, which provides certainty of value to Royal shareholders. The
Company believes that the financing necessary to complete the proposed
transaction is assured due to the fact that TechTronic has cash reserves
greater than the purchase consideration.
- the increasing legal, accounting, insurance and other costs of remaining
a publicly traded company;
- the Royal Board's judgment, in view of the Company's prospects,
competitive industry trends and tight financing market, as well as
discussions with certain possible acquirers, that it is unlikely that one
or more strategic or financial acquirers would be willing and able to
pay, at the present time, a price for the Company or its assets that
would be as high as the consideration offered to Royal shareholders
pursuant to the Merger Agreement;
- the provisions of the Merger Agreement that allow the Company, under
certain circumstances, to furnish information to and conduct negotiations
with a third party, and terminate the Merger Agreement in connection with
a superior proposal for a business combination or acquisition of the
Company upon payment of a termination fee $5.3 million, which amount
represents approximately 3.5% of the Company's enterprise value, plus
expenses of up to $700,000; and
- the alternatives available to the Company, including the range of
potential values of the Company, and the Royal Board's perception that
the risk associated with consummating the sale to TechTronic at a known
cash premium to market was lower than the risks associated with achieving
a competitive value through the implementation of the Company's growth
strategy and remaining an independent corporation that would be subject
to significant uncertainties and risks beyond the Company's control,
including negative general business and economic conditions, a
consolidating retail environment, and tight financing markets.
PROCESS
The Royal Board's favorable recommendation followed an extensive process of
seeking business combination proposals conducted by the Company and NatCity
Investments, pursuant to which interested parties signed confidentiality
agreements, met with Company management, reviewed confidential information about
the Company and its business, and reviewed public disclosures by and about the
business, financial condition and current business strategy of Royal.
In considering TechTronic's proposal, the Royal Board took into account
discussions with other interested parties regarding the value and form of
consideration, expected tax treatment, termination fees payable in the event
that a more favorable transaction was presented to the Company following the
execution of a definitive agreement, and transaction risks related to timing and
the certainty that a transaction would be consummated considering regulatory
risks and closing conditions. Based on these considerations, the Royal Board
believed that acceptance of the TechTronic's proposal was in the best interest
of Royal shareholders.
The Board also considered the structure of the Merger and the terms and
conditions of the Merger Agreement, including:
- the ability of the Company, prior to the consummation of the Merger, to
consider and negotiate unsolicited third party business combination
proposals, subject to certain conditions;
- the right of the Royal Board, prior to the consummation of the Merger, to
terminate the Merger Agreement and accept a superior proposal, subject to
the satisfaction of certain conditions and the payment of a termination
fee to TechTronic; and
- the ability to consummate the Merger within a reasonable period of time,
including the likelihood of receiving necessary regulatory approvals.
17
NEGATIVE FACTORS
The Royal Board also identified and considered the following potentially
negative factors in its deliberations:
- The possible disruption to the Company's businesses that may result from
the announcement of the transaction and the resulting distraction of
management attention from the day-to-day operations of the Company's
businesses;
- The restrictions contained in the Merger Agreement on the operation of
the Company's businesses during the period between the signing of the
Merger Agreement and the completion of the Merger;
- The $5.3 million termination fee plus up to $700,000 of expenses to be
paid to TechTronic if the Merger Agreement is terminated under
circumstances specified in the Merger Agreement. See "The Merger
Agreement -- Termination; Termination Fee" on page 40;
- The possibility that the Merger might not be completed, which could cause
the Company's stock price to decline to its pre-merger announcement
level;
- The possibility that the Merger might not be completed, and the cost of
the failed transaction on the Company's operating results.
- The Company's ability to attract and retain key personnel could be
impaired due to the uncertainty involved with the proposed transaction
and employees' concerns regarding job security;
- The possibility of significant costs, delays and non-consummation of the
Merger Agreement resulting from seeking regulatory approvals necessary
for the consummation of the Merger Agreement; and
- Gains, if any, arising from receipt of the cash paid in the Merger would
be taxable to Royal shareholders for United States federal income tax
purposes.
The foregoing discussion of the factors considered by the Royal Board is
not intended to be exhaustive. In view of the variety of factors considered in
connection with their evaluation of the Merger Agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Merger, the Royal Board did
not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise assign relative
weights to the specific factors considered in reaching its determination,
considering all such factors as a whole. In addition, individual members of the
Royal Board may have given different weights to different factors.
THE ROYAL BOARD HAS UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE MERGER AGREEMENT WITH
TECHTRONIC IS FAIR TO AND IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF ROYAL SHAREHOLDERS AND
BELIEVES THAT THE MERGER AGREEMENT REPRESENTS AN OPPORTUNITY TO ENHANCE VALUE
FOR ROYAL SHAREHOLDERS.
ACCORDINGLY, THE ROYAL BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT ROYAL SHAREHOLDERS
VOTE FOR ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT.
In considering the recommendation of the Royal Board with respect to the
Merger Agreement, Royal shareholders should be aware that certain directors and
officers of the Company have arrangements that cause them to have interests in
the transaction that are different from, or are in addition to, the interests of
Royal shareholders generally. See "Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger"
beginning on page 25.
OPINION OF NATCITY INVESTMENTS
The Royal Board asked NatCity Investments to render an opinion to the Royal
Board as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration
to be paid to the holders of Royal shares pursuant to the Merger Agreement. On
December 9, 2002, NatCity Investments delivered an oral opinion, subsequently
confirmed in writing, to the effect that, as of the date of its opinion, and
based upon and subject to the assumptions, limitations and qualifications
contained in its opinion, the consideration to be received by Royal shareholders
pursuant to the Merger Agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to
the holders of Royal shares.
The full text of the written opinion of NatCity Investments is attached to
this document as ANNEX B and incorporated into this proxy statement by
reference. We urge you to read that opinion carefully and in its entirety for
the assumptions made, procedures followed, other matters considered and limits
of the review undertaken in arriving at that opinion.
18
NatCity Investments was retained to serve as an advisor to the Royal Board
and not as an advisor to or agent of any shareholder of the Company. NatCity
Investments' opinion was prepared for the Royal Board and is directed only to
the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the consideration to be paid to
Royal shareholders pursuant to the Merger and does not address the merits of the
decision by the Company to engage in the Merger or other business strategies
considered by the Company, nor does it address the Company's decision to proceed
with the Merger. NatCity Investments' opinion does not constitute a
recommendation to any of the Company's shareholder as to how that shareholder
should vote at the Special Meeting.
NatCity Investments did not determine the amount of the consideration to be
paid to Royal shareholders pursuant to the Merger. The amount of consideration
was determined in negotiations between the Company and TechTronic, in which
NatCity Investments advised the Royal Board. No restrictions or limitations were
imposed by the Royal Board on NatCity Investments with respect to the
investigations made or the procedures followed by NatCity Investments in
rendering its opinion.
In rendering its opinion, NatCity Investments reviewed, among other things:
- A draft of the Merger Agreement, dated December 6, 2002, which NatCity
Investments understood to be in substantially final form;
- A draft of the form of voting agreement, dated December 6, 2002, for
certain Royal shareholders, which NatCity Investments understood to be in
substantially final form;
- A draft of the form of employment agreement, dated December 7, 2002, for
certain executive officers of the Company, which NatCity Investments
understood to be in substantially final form;
- The Company's Annual Reports on Form 10-K for each of the fiscal years
ended December 31, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001, its Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, June 30 and September 30,
2002, and other publicly available information about the Company;
- Unaudited internal information, primarily financial in nature and
including projections, prepared and furnished to NatCity Investments by
the Company's management;
- Publicly available information concerning the trading of, and the trading
market for, Royal shares, as discussed in more detail in "-- Historical
Stock Trading Analyses" below;
- Publicly available information with respect to certain other companies
that NatCity Investments believed to be comparable to the Company and the
trading markets for those other companies' securities, as discussed in
more detail in "-- Comparable Public Company Analysis" below; and
- Publicly available information concerning the nature and terms of other
transactions that NatCity Investments considered relevant to its analysis
of this Merger, as discussed in more detail in "-- Comparable Merger &
Acquisition Analysis" below.
NatCity Investments also discussed past and current operations and the
financial condition and prospects of the Company, as well as other matters
NatCity Investments believed to be relevant to its analysis of the Merger, with
certain officers and employees of the Company, and conducted such other
financial studies, analyses and investigations, and considered such other
information, as NatCity Investments deemed necessary or appropriate.
You should note that in rendering its opinion, NatCity Investments relied
upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other information
provided to it or publicly available. NatCity Investments also assumed and
relied upon the representations and warranties of the Company and TechTronic
contained in the Merger Agreement. NatCity Investments was not engaged to, and
did not independently attempt to, verify any of that information. NatCity
Investments also relied upon the management of the Company as to the
reasonableness and achievability of the financial and operating projections
provided to it, and the assumptions underlying those projections. Management
represented to NatCity Investments that these projections and assumptions
reflected their best currently available estimates and judgments. NatCity
Investments was not engaged to assess the reasonableness or achievability of
those projections or the assumptions underlying them and expresses no view on
those matters. NatCity Investments did not conduct a physical inspection or
appraisal of any of the assets, properties or facilities of the Company, nor was
it furnished with any evaluation or appraisal.
19
NatCity Investments also assumed that the conditions to the Merger as set
forth in the Merger Agreement would be satisfied and that the Merger would be
completed on a timely basis in the manner contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
NatCity Investments' opinion is based on economic and market conditions and
other circumstances existing on, and information made available as of, the date
of its opinion. NatCity Investments' opinion does not address any matters after
the date of its opinion. Although subsequent developments may affect its
opinion, NatCity Investments does not have the obligation to update, revise or
reaffirm its opinion.
The following is a brief summary of the financial and comparative analyses
performed by NatCity Investments to arrive at its opinion. This summary is not
intended to be an exhaustive description of the analyses performed by NatCity
Investments but includes all material factors considered by NatCity Investments
in rendering its opinion. NatCity Investments drew no specific conclusions from
any of these analyses, but subjectively factored its observations from these
analyses into its qualitative assessment of the relevant facts and
circumstances.
Each analysis performed by NatCity Investments is a common methodology
utilized in determining valuations. Although other valuation techniques may
exist, NatCity Investments believes that the analyses described below, when
taken as a whole, provide the most appropriate analyses for NatCity Investments
to arrive at its opinion.
HISTORICAL STOCK TRADING ANALYSES
NatCity Investments reviewed the historical performance of the Royal shares
based on an historical analysis of closing prices and trading volumes for the
one month, three month, six month, twelve month, two year and five year periods
ended December 6, 2002. NatCity Investments noted that the average closing price
for the Royal shares over these periods ranged from $4.37 to $5.30, with the
lowest average closing price being the three month average and the highest
average closing price being the twelve month average.
The following chart summarizes these prices and volume of trading of the
Royal shares.
AVERAGE DAILY CLOSE
AVERAGE DAILY -------------
PERIOD CLOSE VOLUME HIGH LOW
------ ------- ------- ----- -----
Latest Month......................................... $4.75 8,773 $4.99 $4.30
Last 3 Months........................................ 4.37 11,563 4.99 3.55
Last 6 Months........................................ 5.05 14,157 6.99 3.55
Last 12 Months....................................... 5.30 18,370 7.13 3.55
Last 2 Years......................................... 5.05 15,580 7.13 3.20
Last 5 Years......................................... 5.16 35,212 7.13 2.50
NatCity Investments also reviewed the distribution of the closing prices of
the Royal shares for the prior one year period and five year period compared to
the $7.37 per share to be paid to Royal shareholders pursuant to the Merger
Agreement.
TRADING VOLUME AT TRADING DAYS AT
PRIOR PERIOD OR BELOW $7.37 OR BELOW $7.37
------------ ----------------- ---------------
One Year.............................................. 100% 100%
Five Years............................................ 100% 100%
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW ANALYSES
NatCity Investments analyzed various financial projections prepared by the
management of the Company for the five year period 2003 through 2007 and
performed a discounted cash flow analysis of the Company, as if the Company were
to continue on a stand-alone basis, based on these projections. A discounted
cash flow analysis is a methodology used to derive an implied equity value for a
corporate entity by discounting to the present its future, unlevered, after-tax
free cash flows and an estimated terminal value of the entity. NatCity
Investments calculated an implied equity value per share reference range for the
Company by discounting to the present the unlevered, after-tax free cash flows
that the Company is projected to generate over the five-year period 2003 through
2007 and the terminal value of the Company based on a range of multiples applied
to projected 2007
20
EBITDA. NatCity Investments then compared the implied equity value reference
range to the proposed offer price in the Merger. This analysis was repeated in a
similar fashion applying a discount to the financial projections as prepared by
the management of the Company.
NatCity Investments believed that a discount to management's projections
was appropriate due to several factors that have affected the Company's
profitability historically, and that are expected to affect its profitability in
the future. These factors include, among others, the continued need by the
Company to invest in new product development for both its core upright floor
care market as well as ancillary products it sells from time to time.
Management's projections assumed that the Company would continually be able to
introduce innovative, high margin products to replace maturing products. Because
there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to develop
new products that can be sold at historical revenue and profitability levels,
NatCity Investments focused on the core business and did not assume continual
innovation.
Furthermore, even after new products have been developed and successfully
introduced to consumers, the Company faces stiff competition in all of the
markets it serves. Its competitors often compete on price and through the
incorporation of additional features and benefits into competitive products.
This competition negatively impacts profits within the industry. This dynamic is
compounded by the fact that the Company relies on large retailers for much of
its business and these retailers are focused on providing its customers with low
prices. While the Company may be able to expand margins in the short term given
the introduction of new products, the Company has been challenged to maintain
these margins given this competitive response. NatCity Investments sees no
reason for these industry dynamics to change. To the contrary, these dynamics
may become more negative given the growing presence in the U.S. market of low
cost consumer goods manufactured in Asia and Mexico. While management's
projections account for these dynamics, NatCity Investments believed they would
have more of an impact on future results than assumed by management based on
NatCity Investments' experience with the Company and its industry, discussions
with other industry participants and parties interested in acquiring the
Company, management's difficulty in meeting past projections for the Company's
core business of floor care products, and NatCity Investments' generally
conservative approach in analyzing management projections. Taking these company
and industry dynamics into consideration, NatCity Investments concluded that a
30% discount to the free cash flows generated by the Company was appropriate in
the discounted analysis. With this discount, management's projections are more
in line with the historical performance of the Company's core floor care
business, which Nat City Investments considered to be the Company's principal
sustainable business.
For purposes of these analyses, NatCity Investments used discount rates of
11.7% to 13.7%, based on the projected weighted average cost of capital,
including funded debt, of the Company and terminal 2007 EBITDA multiples of 4.5x
to 5.5x, which were derived by reference to the implied public market trading
multiples of enterprise value to EBITDA of the selected companies in the
Comparable Public Company Analysis as discussed below.
These analyses indicated an implied equity value per share reference range
for the Company of approximately $9.84 to $10.89 and $6.20 to $6.93 in the
undiscounted and discounted analysis, respectively. NatCity Investments noted
that the proposed offer price of $7.37 per share was below the implied equity
value reference range for the Company in the undiscounted scenario, and above
the implied equity value reference range for the Company in the discounted
scenario.
COMPARABLE PUBLIC COMPANY ANALYSIS
NatCity Investments reviewed and compared selected financial data of the
Company to financial data of eight publicly traded companies that NatCity
Investments considered reasonably similar to the Company in that these companies
operate in the household appliances industry. NatCity Investments believed that
the companies it selected were comparable, in the aggregate, to the Company.
More direct comparisons to competitors in the floorcare industry was not
possible because such competitors were divisions or subsidiaries of larger
corporations, including some of those listed above, or were privately owned. No
single selected comparable company is exactly the same as the Company. For
example, any particular comparable company may differ from the Company based on,
among other things, the size of the company, the geographic coverage of the
company's
21
operations, and the particular markets on which the company focuses. The
selected comparable companies included:
- Applica Incorporated - National Presto Industries, Inc.
- Electrolux AB - Salton, Inc.
- Helen of Troy, Limited - Water Pik Technologies, Inc.
- Maytag Corporation - Whirlpool Corporation
NatCity Investments reviewed, among other things, enterprise values as a
multiple of actual latest twelve month sales, earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, commonly referred to as EBITDA, and earnings
before interest and taxes, commonly referred to as EBIT. NatCity Investments
calculated enterprise values as the market value of equity securities plus
indebtedness and minority interests less cash and cash equivalents, as of
December 5, 2002. Indebtedness includes any off-balance sheet securitizations.
NatCity Investments also reviewed equity values as a multiple of projected 2002
EPS and projected 2003 EPS. EPS projections for the selected companies were
based on publicly available median consensus research analyst estimates.
Projected financial data for the Company were based on projections provided by
the Company's management. Latest twelve month sales, EBITDA and EBIT data for
the Company were based on year-end 2002 projected financial statements provided
by the Company's management. NatCity Investments then compared the implied
multiples derived for the selected companies with the multiples implied in the
Merger based on the estimated transaction value of the Merger. For purposes of
determining the estimated transaction value of the Merger, NatCity assumed
consideration of $7.37 per Royal share to be paid pursuant to the Merger and
approximately $45.2 million net in funded debt, including a $22.0 million
off-balance sheet securitization, to be assumed by TechTronic. The following
table sets forth the implied multiples for the selected companies, as compared
to the implied multiples based on the estimated transaction value of the Merger:
MEDIAN IMPLIED
COMPARABLE TRANSACTION
COMPARABLE PUBLIC COMPANIES MULTIPLE MULTIPLE
--------------------------- ---------- -----------
Multiple of Sales........................................... 0.5x 0.4x
Multiple of EBITDA.......................................... 5.2x 5.6x
Multiple of EBIT............................................ 6.9x 13.6x
Multiple of 2002 Projected EPS.............................. 9.2x 18.6x
Multiple of 2003 Projected EPS.............................. 8.8x 5.9x
NatCity Investments noted that the implied multiples of the Company, based
on the transaction value of the Merger, were generally above the median
transaction multiples of the selected transactions, with the exception of the
Multiples of Sales and 2003 Projected EPS.
No company utilized in the comparable public company analysis is identical
to the Company. NatCity Investments made judgments and assumptions with regard
to industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial
conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of either the
Company or TechTronic. Mathematical analysis (such as determining the mean or
median) is not itself a meaningful method of using publicly traded comparable
company data.
COMPARABLE MERGER & ACQUISITION ANALYSIS
Using publicly available information, NatCity Investments reviewed certain
transactions in the household appliances industry completed since November 1999
that had targets with comparable EBITDA margins and enterprise values ranging
from approximately $50 million to approximately $500 million. These transactions
were chosen because they were business combination transactions that, for
purposes of the analysis, NatCity Investments considered reasonably similar to
the Merger in that these transactions involved companies in the household
appliances industry, were transactions of a comparable size and that occurred in
a recent period. NatCity Investments believed that the transactions it selected
were comparable, in the aggregate, to the Merger. However, no single selected
comparable transaction is exactly the same as the Merger. For example, any
particular selected comparable transaction may differ from the Merger based on,
among other things, the size of
22
the transaction, the form of consideration paid in the transaction, the
structure of the transaction, and the date on which the transaction was
consummated. The selected comparable transactions included:
TARGET ACQUIROR
------ --------
Allegheny Teledyne Consumer................................. Shareholders
Moulinex SA................................................. Elfi SA
Kenwood Appliances PLC...................................... De Longhi Pinguino SA
Pifco Holdings PLC.......................................... Salton, Inc.
Fisher & Paykel Appliances.................................. Shareholders
For each of these transactions, NatCity Investments calculated the ratio of
the enterprise value of the transaction to the target company's actual latest
twelve month sales, EBITDA and EBIT. NatCity Investments then compared the
implied multiples derived for the selected transactions with the multiples
implied in the Merger for the Company based on the estimated transaction value
of the Merger. All multiples for the selected transactions were based on
publicly available information at the time of the announcement of the particular
selected transaction. Latest twelve month sales, EBITDA and EBIT data for the
Company were based on year-end 2002 projected financial statements provided by
the Company's management. The following table sets forth the implied multiples
for the selected transactions, as compared to the implied multiples based on the
estimated transaction value of the Merger:
MEDIAN IMPLIED
TRANSACTION TRANSACTION
COMPARABLE M&A TRANSACTIONS MULTIPLE MULTIPLE
--------------------------- ----------- -----------
Multiple of Sales........................................... 0.5x 0.4x
Multiple of EBITDA.......................................... 5.5x 5.6x
Multiple of EBIT............................................ 10.6x 13.6x
NatCity Investments noted that the implied multiples of the Company, based
on the transaction value of the Merger, were generally above the median
transaction multiples of the selected transactions, with the exception of the
multiple of Sales.
LEVERAGED BUYOUT ANALYSES
NatCity Investments performed leveraged buyout analyses of the Company as a
means of establishing the value of the Company assuming its sale to a typical
financial buyer. A leveraged buyout involves the acquisition or recapitalization
of a company financed primarily by incurring indebtedness that is serviced by
the operating cash flow of the company after the leveraged buyout. NatCity
Investments analyzed two scenarios, one using management's projections and the
second using a 30% discount to management's EBITDA projections for the reasons
discussed above in "-- Discounted Cash Flow Analyses." Both scenarios assumed
that the Royal shares would be purchased by a financial buyer at a price
resulting in a rate of return in excess of 30% for equity investors, 20% for
subordinated debt investors, including warrants, and 6-7% for senior debt
investors. In both scenarios, NatCity Investments used terminal 2007 EBITDA
multiples of 4.5x to 5.5x, which were derived by reference to the implied public
market trading multiples of enterprise value to EBITDA of the selected companies
in the Comparable Public Company Analysis as discussed above. The first scenario
assumed that senior debt and total debt of the company after the leveraged
buyout would not exceed 2.28 times and 3.04 times EBITDA, respectively. The
second scenario assumed that senior debt and total debt of the company after the
leveraged buyout would not exceed 1.83 times and 2.44 times EBITDA,
respectively.
NatCity Investments determined that these rates of return and leverage
multiples were consistent with publicly-disclosed multiples of 38 recent
leveraged buyout transactions that occurred year-to-date as described in the
November 2002 issue of Standard & Poor's Leveraged Commentary & Data. In
Standard & Poor's statistical analysis, the average equity contribution to a
leveraged buyout was approximately 40%, with the remainder borrowed from senior
and subordinated lenders. Based on NatCity Investments' frequent interaction
with equity sponsors, subordinated lenders, and commercial bankers, NatCity
Investments determined that the expected rates of return on the various capital
sources were consistent with the then current market. These analyses implied an
equity value per share range of $6.31 to $6.67 in the first scenario, and $4.63
to $4.91 in the second scenario. NatCity Investments noted that the proposed
offer price of $7.37 per share was above the implied equity value reference
range for the Company in both scenarios.
23
PREMIUMS PAID ANALYSIS
Using publicly available information, NatCity Investments reviewed 37
publicly-disclosed control acquisitions where consideration was cash or cash
equivalents that were completed since January 1, 2001, and had equity values
above $50 million and below $200 million. These transactions were chosen based
on the comparable size of the transactions and the recent period in which the
transactions were completed. NatCity Investments believed that the transactions
selected were comparable, in the aggregate, to the Merger. However, no single
selected transaction is exactly the same as the Merger. For example, any
particular selected transaction may differ from the Merger based on, among other
things, the size of the transaction, the form of consideration paid in the
transaction, the structure of the transaction, the date on which the transaction
was consummated, and the industry in which the transaction occurred. NatCity
Investments excluded transactions that occurred in the technology and software
and financial services industries, which both exhibit industry dynamics that are
materially different from the Company's industry. Many technology and software
companies are, on average, not profitable or only marginally profitable, and
many are in an early or start-up phase of their lifespan relative to a
manufacturing company. These relatively young companies most often trade based
upon perceived value of their technology. Financial services companies are
highly regulated enterprises that often trade as a multiple of book value. In
addition, financial service companies are not in the business of manufacturing a
tangible product and, as a result, respond differently to changes in economic
conditions.
For each of the target companies involved in the transactions, NatCity
Investments examined the closing stock price one day, one week and one month
prior to announcement of the transaction. In addition, NatCity Investments
calculated the premium of the $7.37 per share that Royal shareholders would
receive to the closing prices for Royal shares for the periods one day, one week
and one month prior to an assumed announcement date of December 5, 2002, when
the Company's closing price per share was $4.84. The following table sets forth
the implied premiums for the selected control acquisitions, as compared to the
implied premiums based on the price per share offered pursuant to the Merger
Agreement:
CASH CONSIDERATION IMPLIED MERGER
PREMIUMS PAID TRANSACTIONS MEDIAN PREMIUM
------------- ------------------- --------------
One Day.............................................. 35.9% 52.3.%
One Week............................................. 45.1% 51.3%
One Month............................................ 49.3% 51.0%
NatCity Investments noted that the implied premiums for the Merger are greater
than the premiums paid in the selected control acquisitions.
CONCLUSION
The summary set forth above describes the principal elements of the
presentation made by NatCity Investments to the Royal Board on December 9, 2002.
The preparation of a fairness opinion involves various determinations as to the
most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application
of these methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, the opinion is
not readily susceptible to summary description. Each of the analyses conducted
by NatCity Investments was carried out in order to provide a different
perspective on the Merger and add to the total mix of information available.
NatCity Investments did not form a conclusion as to whether any individual
analysis, considered in isolation, supported or failed to support an opinion as
to fairness from a financial point of view. Rather, in reaching its conclusion,
NatCity Investments considered the results of the analyses in light of each
other and ultimately reached its opinion based upon the results of all analyses
taken as a whole. Except as indicated above, NatCity Investments did not place
particular reliance or weight on any individual analysis, but instead concluded
that its analyses, taken as a whole, support its determination. Accordingly,
notwithstanding the separate factors summarized above, NatCity Investments
believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting
portions of its analysis and the factors considered by it, without considering
all analyses and factors, could create an incomplete or misleading view of the
evaluation process underlying its opinion. In performing its analyses, NatCity
Investments made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance,
business and economic conditions and other matters. The analyses performed by
NatCity Investments are not necessarily indicative of actual value or future
results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by the
analyses.
24
MISCELLANEOUS
Pursuant to the terms of an engagement letter dated October 16, 2002, the
Company has paid to NatCity Investments a fixed fee for the fairness opinion
described herein. In addition, the Royal Board agreed to cause the Company to
pay NatCity Investments a fee of $1,250,000 for providing financial advisory
services to the Royal Board that is customary in transactions of this nature,
which is contingent upon consummation of the Merger, against which will be
credited the fixed fee of $250,000 for the fairness opinion described herein.
The Royal Board also agreed to cause the Company to reimburse NatCity
Investments for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, and to indemnify NatCity
Investments and related persons against liabilities in connection with its
engagement, including liabilities under federal securities laws. The terms of
the fee arrangement with NatCity Investments were negotiated at arm's-length
between the Royal Board and NatCity Investments.
NatCity Investments has, in the past, provided investment-banking services
to the Company for which NatCity Investments received customary compensation. In
the ordinary course of business, NatCity Investments may actively trade the
securities of the Company for its own account and for the accounts of its
customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in
those securities.
NatCity Investments, as part of its investment banking services, is
regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and securities in connection
with mergers, acquisitions, underwritings, sales and distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and other
purposes. The Royal Board selected NatCity Investments based on its experience
in transactions similar to the Merger and its reputation in the brokerage and
investment communities.
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE MERGER
In considering the recommendations of the Royal Board, you should be aware
that certain members of the Royal Board and management have interests that are
different from, or in addition to, your interests as a holder of Royal shares
generally. Each of the members of the Royal Board was aware of these interests
and considered them, among other matters, in approving the Merger Agreement and
the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Merger.
We refer you to the information under the headings "Beneficial Ownership of
Royal Shares -- Security Ownership of the Company Management" on page 42 for
information regarding our current officers and directors and their share
ownership in the Company. The Company's officers and directors who own Royal
shares at the Effective Time of the Merger will be entitled, as will all Royal
shareholders, to receive $7.37 per share as consideration for their Royal
shares.
In addition, the rights of holders, including participants in compensation
plans, of all unexercised options to purchase Royal shares and phantom stock
rights will be converted into a right to receive cash for each Royal share
issuable or in respect of which payment is due upon the exercise of these
options and rights, respectively, in the amount of $7.37 less the applicable
exercise price of these options and rights. All unvested options and phantom
stock rights outstanding at the Effective Time of the Merger will vest and
become immediately exercisable as a result of the transactions contemplated by
the Merger Agreement. The following table shows the dollar value of the payments
before taxes to be received by the directors and executive officers of the
Company with respect to their options and rights that would otherwise be
unvested as of March 31, 2003, and which would become vested as a result of the
Merger:
TOTAL
NAME PAYMENT
---- ----------
Michael J. Merriman......................................... $1,080,403
John P. Rochon.............................................. 36,850
E. Patrick Nalley........................................... 36,850
Joseph B. Richey, II........................................ 36,850
R. Louis Schneeberger....................................... 36,850
Jack Kahl, Jr............................................... 36,850
Richard C. Farone........................................... 658,062
Richard G. Vasek............................................ 609,930
David M. Brickner........................................... 603,680
----------
TOTAL..................................................... $3,136,325
25
Options and phantom stock awards that would otherwise be vested as of March
31, 2003 are included on the table "Beneficial Ownership of Royal
Shares -- Security Ownership of Management" on page 42 hereof.
Michael J. Merriman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and the Company are parties to an Employment Agreement dated March 14, 2002,
pursuant to which Mr. Merriman is entitled to a base salary of $400,000 per
year, and participates in the Company's annual management incentive plan
("MIP"). The term of Mr. Merriman's employment agreement is for one year, with
automatic renewals unless one party gives notice of its intent not to renew the
agreement. In the event of Mr. Merriman's termination without cause, termination
due to death or disability, termination for "good reason" (as defined in the
agreement), or if the Company gives notice of its intention not to renew the
agreement (collectively, a "Triggering Termination"), Mr. Merriman is entitled
to severance payments equal to: (a) three times the sum of his then current
annual base salary and the average annual bonus based on the prior three years
(paid in six semi-annual installments); (b) a prorated portion of his MIP award
for the year in which the termination occurs, if applicable; (c) a lump sum
severance payment determined annually by the Royal Board (currently $1.5
million); (d) forgiveness of all amounts due on his April 2001 $542,750 note
payable to the Company; and (e) continuation of his insurance and other employee
benefits for 36 months. If any of these payments or any other payment made by
the Company would precipitate an excise tax as a "parachute payment" under the
Internal Revenue Code, Mr. Merriman is entitled to receive an amount equal to
the amount of those excise taxes plus a tax "gross-up" payment. If a Triggering
Termination occurred following a change-in-control (as defined in the
agreement), Mr. Merriman's severance payments would be paid in a lump sum. The
agreement also contained a covenant by Mr. Merriman not to compete with the
Company for up to 36 months following the termination of his employment. In the
event of a Triggering Termination, any and all unvested stock options and
phantom stock rights held by Mr. Merriman would fully vest.
In connection with execution of the Merger Agreement and assuming the
Merger is consummated, Mr. Merriman's employment agreement has been amended. Mr.
Merriman has agreed to repay all amounts due on his $542,750 note payable to the
Company and forego the other benefits provided in clauses (a) through (e) above
in exchange for a lump-sum payment of $742,000, plus the contingent payment
described below. Moreover, in the event Mr. Merriman is terminated without
"cause", as defined in his new employment agreement, after the Merger, or
terminates his employment for "good reason", as defined in his new employment
agreement, his severance shall be one-half the sum of his then-current base
salary and the average of his annual bonus for the prior three years. The
contingent payment equals 34% of the 2003 EBITDA bonus pool, payable on or
before April 1, 2004. The 2003 EBITDA bonus pool shall be equal to 50% of the
amount by which the Company's EBITDA exceeds $35 million, up to $42 million for
fiscal year 2003, excluding bonuses and costs related to the Merger (including,
but not limited to, legal and professional fees related to the Merger, non-cash
write-offs, and severance costs related to 2003 terminations); provided,
however, that the EBITDA bonus pool shall not exceed $3.5 million; provided,
further, that, if the EBITDA attributable to the Company's business, excluding
EBITDA attributable to the Telezapper product for 2003, does not equal or exceed
$30 million, then no 2003 EBITDA bonus pool shall be created. All determinations
of EBITDA for purposes of determining the amount of the EBITDA bonus pool and
any entitlement to a contingent payment shall be made in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles applied in the United States and
consistent with the Company's recent historical practices. Under Mr. Merriman's
amended employment agreement, he is entitled to receive a stock option for
2,000,000 shares of TechTronic in May 2003, following release of TechTronic's
earnings for fiscal 2002.
The Company has entered into severance agreements with Messrs. Farone,
Vasek and Brickner that are designed to retain these executives and provide for
continuity of management in the event of any actual or threatened change in the
control of the Company. Each agreement only becomes operative upon a "change in
control" as defined in the agreements. For three years after a change in
control, if an executive's employment were terminated for reasons other than
"cause" (as defined in the agreements), the executive would be entitled to
receive a severance amount equal to three times of his then base salary. The
Company could make an additional payment to reimburse the executives for excise
tax payments, if any, triggered by the foregoing severance payments. All options
and stock rights held by the executives with respect to the Company's common
stock become immediately exercisable upon the date of termination of employment
and remain exercisable for a period of up to three years.
In connection with the execution of the Merger Agreement, Messrs. Farone,
Vasek and Brickner agreed to amend their severance agreements. In exchange for
lump sum payments of $311,000, $289,000 and $251,000, respectively, and the
contingent payments described below, Messrs. Farone, Vasek and Brickner each
agreed to
26
new one-year employment contracts that provide for severance payments in the
event of their termination of employment for reasons other than "cause" or for
"good reason", as defined in their new agreements. The severance payments equal
one-half the sum of the then current salary of the executive plus the average of
the annual bonus for the prior three years. The contingent payment for each
officer equals 12% of the 2003 EBITDA bonus pool, payable on or before April 1,
2004. Under their new employment agreements, Messrs. Farone, Vasek and Brickner
each are entitled to receive stock options for 1,000,000 shares of TechTronic in
May 2003, following release of TechTronic's earnings for fiscal 2002.
The Company has change-in-control agreements with several other officers of
the Company that provided severance payments to each such person equal to two or
three times his or her then base salary. These individuals have also entered
into new agreements that provide an aggregate lump sum payment of $1,349,000,
plus an aggregate contingent payment equal to 30% of the 2003 EBITDA bonus pool.
Payment of any monies from the 2003 EBITDA bonus pool is contingent on the
Company's 2003 EBITDA exceeding $35 million. The Company has not achieved $35
million in EBITDA in any of the last three years, and no contingent payments
would be made if these results were replicated. The 2003 projections provided to
TechTronic and utilized by NatCity Investments, which assume the Company no
longer has the cost of being a public company, estimated 2003 EBITDA at $42
million before the 2003 EBITDA bonus pool payments and merger-related costs.
Were the Company to achieve these results, the aggregate contingent payments
would be $3.5 million.
GOVERNMENTAL AND REGULATORY MATTERS
Under the Hart-Scott Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (the "HSR
Act") and rules promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission (the "FTC"), certain
acquisitions may not be consummated unless certain information has been
furnished to the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice
and the FTC and the applicable waiting period requirements have been satisfied.
The Merger is subject to these requirements.
Pursuant to the requirements of the HSR Act, TechTronic filed the required
Notification and Report Forms (the "Forms") with the Antitrust Division and the
FTC on February 6, 2003. Neither governmental agency requested additional
information, and TechTronic and the company received notice that their request
for early termination of the statutory waiting period applicable to the Merger
was granted on February 20, 2003.
The Antitrust Division and the FTC frequently scrutinize the legality of
transactions under the antitrust laws. At any time before or after the
consummation of any such transactions, the Antitrust Division or the FTC could,
notwithstanding termination of the waiting period, take such action under the
antitrust laws as it deems necessary or desirable in the public interest,
including seeking to enjoin the Merger or divestiture of assets of the Company
or TechTronic. Private parties and State Attorneys General may also bring legal
actions under the antitrust laws.
MATERIAL FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER
The following discussion summarizes the material U.S. Federal income tax
consequences of the Merger. This discussion is based upon the provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (referred to as the "Code" in this
proxy statement), the regulations promulgated under the Code, Internal Revenue
Service rulings, and judicial and administrative rulings in effect as of the
date of this proxy statement, all of which are subject to change, possibly with
retroactive effect. This discussion does not address all aspects of federal
income taxation that may be relevant to a holder of Royal shares in light of the
shareholder's particular circumstances or to those holders of Royal shares
subject to special rules, such as shareholders who are not citizens or residents
of the United States, shareholders who are financial institutions or
broker-dealers, tax-exempt organizations, insurance companies, dealers in
securities, foreign corporations, shareholders who acquired their Royal shares
through the exercise of options or similar derivative securities or shareholders
who hold their shares as part of a straddle or conversion transaction. This
discussion also does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to
holders of options to purchase Royal shares or phantom stock rights in respect
of Royal shares. This discussion assumes that holders of Royal shares hold their
respective shares as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the
Code. No ruling from the Internal Revenue Service will be applied for with
respect to the federal income tax consequences discussed herein and accordingly
there can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will agree with the
positions described in this proxy statement.
Cash payments received by Royal shareholders upon redemption of their Royal
shares will be treated as received in exchange for their shares, and gain or
loss will be recognized for federal income tax purposes on receipt of the cash
payment, measured by the difference between the amount of cash received and the
basis of
27
Royal shares redeemed. The gain or loss will be long term capital gain or loss
if Royal shares are considered to have been held for more than one year at the
time of the Merger.
If a Royal shareholder perfects dissenter's rights with respect to its
Royal shares, this holder should generally recognize capital gain or loss at the
Effective Time of the Merger in an amount equal to the difference between the
"amount realized" and the adjusted tax basis of its Royal shares. For this
purpose, although there is no authority directly on point, the amount realized
generally should equal the trading price of Royal shares at the Effective Time
of the Merger. This holder should also recognize capital gain or loss at the
time the appraised fair cash value is received, to the extent the payment
exceeds or is less than the amount realized at the Effective Time of the Merger.
In addition, a portion of the payment may be characterized as interest income.
Certain non-corporate holders of Royal shares may be subject to backup
withholding at a rate of 31% on cash payments received pursuant to the Merger.
Backup withholding will not apply, however, to a holder of Royal shares who
furnishes a taxpayer identification number and certifies that he or she is not
subject to backup withholding on the substitute Form W-9 included in the
transmittal letter, who provides a certificate of foreign status on Form W-8, or
who is otherwise exempt from backup withholding. A holder of Royal shares who
fails to provide the correct tax identification number on Form W-9 may be
subject to a $50.00 penalty imposed by the Internal Revenue Service.
THE ABOVE DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL TAX CONSEQUENCES MAY NOT APPLY TO CERTAIN
CATEGORIES OF SHAREHOLDERS SUBJECT TO SPECIAL TREATMENT UNDER THE INTERNAL
REVENUE CODE. THE COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX
ADVISERS TO DETERMINE THE SPECIFIC TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER, INCLUDING ANY
FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN OR OTHER TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER.
RECENT LITIGATION AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTS
Since November 13, 2002, when the Company filed its report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2002, the following developments, which
shareholders may deem important, have occurred:
The Company filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the Northern District of
Ohio against Euro-Pro Corporation and Sanyo North America Corporation (together
referred to as "Defendants") on November 15, 2002, under the patent, trademark
and unfair competition laws of the United States. The complaint asserts that
Defendants infringe certain patents relating to bagless technology held by the
Company. The Company seeks damages, injunction on future production and legal
fees.
On December 11, 2002, the Company announced that it had entered into a
cross license agreement with Matsushita Home Appliances ("Panasonic") with
respect to certain patents and related intellectual property rights. Panasonic
has received a license to continue to manufacture and market bagless upright
vacuum cleaner products under the Royal bagless upright patent portfolio. Royal
received a license to continue to manufacture and market vacuum cleansers under
patents for certain Panasonic technology. The agreement will result in ongoing
positive cash payments to Royal beginning in the fourth quarter of 2002.
Phone Zap, LLC ("Phone Zap") filed a lawsuit in United States District
Court, District of Columbia, against the Company and its subsidiary, Privacy
Technologies, Inc. on January 6, 2003, under the patent, trademark and unfair
competition laws of the United States. The complaint asserts trademark
infringement by the Company through the use of the Company's Telezapper(R)
trademark. The Company is vigorously defending the suit and believes it is
without merit. If Phone Zap were to prevail on all its claims, it could have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows of the Company.
DISSENTERS' RIGHTS OF ROYAL SHAREHOLDERS
In the Merger, Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company, with
the Company as the corporation surviving the Merger. Each Royal share
outstanding on the Record Date (except for treasury shares of the Company and
shares, if any, for which the holders perfect their dissenters' rights under
Ohio law) will be converted into the right to receive $7.37 per share.
If the Merger is completed, holders of Royal shares outstanding on the
Record Date will have certain rights under the Ohio Revised Code to dissent and
demand dissenters' rights and to receive payment in cash of the fair cash value
of their Royal shares. Royal shareholders who vote in favor of the Merger will
not be entitled to relief as dissenting shareholders. Holders of shares not
voted or voted against adopting the Merger Agreement will
28
retain their dissenters' rights. To perfect rights as a dissenting shareholder,
a Royal shareholder must deliver to the Company a written demand for payment of
the fair cash value of the shares for which relief is sought. This demand for
payment must be delivered no later than 10 days after the Royal shareholders
vote to adopt the Merger Agreement. If the Company then sends a dissenting
shareholder a request for the certificates representing Royal shares for which
relief is sought, the dissenting shareholder must return the certificates
requested to the Company so that they may be endorsed with a legend stating that
a demand for the fair cash value of the holder's Royal shares has been made.
Failure to deliver the certificates within 15 days from the date Company's sends
its request for them may, at the Company's option, result in a loss of all
dissenters' rights under Ohio law. Unless the Company and the dissenting
shareholder come to an agreement as to the fair cash value per Royal share for
which the dissenting shareholder seeks relief within three months after the
service of the demand for payment by the dissenting shareholder, either the
dissenting shareholder or the Company may file a complaint in court. Other
dissenting shareholders may join as plaintiffs or defendants in the resulting
proceeding at that time.
If the shareholder complies with the statutory procedures for exercising or
perfecting dissenters' rights in accordance with Sections 1701.84 and 1701.85 of
the Ohio Revised Code, then a judicial determination will be made as to the fair
cash value required to be paid to the objecting shareholder for the holder's
Royal shares. Any judicial determination of the fair cash value will be based on
the amount that a willing seller, under no compulsion to sell, would be willing
to accept, and a willing buyer, under no compulsion to purchase, would be
willing to pay. In determining the fair cash value of Royal shares, a court is
required to take into account all relevant factors, excluding any appreciation
or depreciation in market value resulting from the proposal of the Merger.
Accordingly, a determination could be based upon considerations other than, or
in addition to, the market value of Royal shares, including, among other things,
asset values and earning capacity. The value so determined may be more or less
than the price per Royal share to be paid in the Merger but in no event can the
value so determined exceed the amount specified in the demand of a particular
shareholder.
From the time written demand for payment of the fair cash value is given
until either the termination of the rights and obligations arising from the
demand or the purchase of the shares related thereto, all rights accruing to the
dissenting shareholder, including voting and dividend or distribution rights,
will be suspended. If any dividend or distribution is paid in money on Royal
shares during the suspension or if any dividend, distribution or interest is
paid in money upon any securities issued in extinguishment of or in substitution
for the shares, an amount equal to the dividend, distribution or interest that
would have been payable on the shares, but for the suspension, shall be paid to
the holder of record of the shares as a credit against the fair cash value of
the shares. If the right to receive the fair cash value is terminated other than
by the purchase of the shares, all rights will be restored to the objecting
shareholder and any distribution that would have been made to the holder of
record of the shares, but for the suspension, will be made at the time of
termination.
The foregoing summary of the rights of dissenting shareholders under Ohio
law does not purport to be a complete statement of the procedures to be followed
by shareholders desiring to exercise any available dissenters' rights and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Section 1701.84 and
Section 1701.85 of the Ohio Revised Code attached as ANNEX C and incorporated
herein by this reference. The preservation and exercise of dissenters' rights
are conditioned on strict adherence to the applicable provisions of the Ohio
Revised Code.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS WITH TECHTRONIC OR THE COMPANY
Except as set forth in this proxy statement, neither TechTronic nor the
Company, nor to their respective knowledge, any of their respective directors,
executive officers or other affiliates has any contract, arrangement,
understanding or relationship with any other person with respect to any
securities of the Company, including, but not limited to, any contract,
arrangement, understanding or relationship concerning the transfer or the voting
of any securities, joint ventures, loan or option arrangements, puts or calls,
guaranties of loans, guaranties against loss or the giving or withholding of
proxies.
TechTronic manufactures finished products bearing the Dirt Devil name for
the Company. During 2000, 2001 and 2002, the Company has purchased approximately
$30 million, $45 million and $54 million, respectively, of TechTronic products.
Further, in late 2002, TechTronic purchased a trade name of another line of
floor care products from a third party. Royal has agreed to handle customer
service for all existing products previously sold utilizing the trade name on a
cost plus 10% basis.
29
As of the date of this proxy statement, neither TechTronic nor any of its
subsidiaries own any Royal shares. To the best of TechTronic's knowledge, no
officers or directors of TechTronic own shares or have interests in the Company.
FEES AND EXPENSES
Except in the event the Merger Agreement is terminated under the
circumstances described in "The Merger Agreement -- Termination; Termination
Fee" beginning on page 40, all costs and expenses incurred in connection with
the Merger Agreement and the transaction it contemplates will be paid by the
party incurring these costs or expenses, whether or not the Merger is
consummated.
DELISTING AND DEREGISTRATION OF SHARES
Royal shares currently are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol "RAM". Upon the consummation of the Merger, Royal shares will be delisted
from the New York Stock Exchange and deregistered under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.
TECHTRONIC SHAREHOLDERS' APPROVAL
The Merger constitutes a major transaction for TechTronic under the Listing
Rules of The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the "Hong Kong Exchange") and
requires the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
TechTronic at an extraordinary general meeting ("EGM"). A circular, prepared in
accordance with the rules of the Hong Kong Exchange, containing details of the
Merger and notice convening the EGM on or about March 31, 2003 is expected to be
dispatched to TechTronic shareholders on or about March 5, 2003. The Board of
Directors of TechTronic has resolved to recommend the Merger to its
shareholders, and the executive members of the Board of Directors who are
TechTronic shareholders eligible to vote at the EGM have expressed their
respective intentions to vote their shares in favor of the Merger. Inasmuch as
such executive members hold approximately 31% of the outstanding shares,
approval of the Merger by the TechTronic shareholders is expected.
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data for the
Company for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2001, and
for the nine month period ended September 30, 2002. The results for the nine
months ended September 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of results for
the full year. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the presentation used in 2002. The data for the five years ended December 31,
2001, should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated financial
statements reported on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31,
2001, and the data for the period ended September 30, 2002 should be read in
conjunction with the Company's unaudited consolidated financial statements
reported on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
No pro forma data giving effect to the Merger is provided because the
Company does not believe pro forma information is material to shareholders in
evaluating the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement, including the Merger, since (1) the consideration offered to Royal
Shareholders is all cash and (2) if the Merger is completed, the Company's
public shareholders will no longer have any equity interest in the Company. The
Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2001, which have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent
accountants, are incorporated by reference in this proxy statement from the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2001, and
the Company's unaudited consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002 are incorporated in this proxy statement by reference to the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
30
period ended September 30, 2002. These two reports are attached to this proxy
statement as Annex D and E, respectively. Certain prior year amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the 2002 presentation.
NINE MONTHS
ENDED YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
SEPTEMBER 30, ----------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
------------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(UNAUDITED) (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS:
Net Sales...................... $272,259 $421,311 $401,515 $401,295 $278,014 $320,417
Cost of Sales.................. 216,481 325,746 315,849 304,452 208,861 229,469
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gross margin................. 55,778 95,565 85,666 96,843 69,153 90,948
Selling, general and
administrative expenses...... 51,261 77,587 72,986 71,160 63,640 68,319
Charging for tooling
obsolescence................. -- -- -- 2,621 -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income from operations....... 4,517 17,978 12,680 23,062 5,513 22,629
Interest expense, net.......... 1,042 2,415 3,503 1,401 1,521 1,412
Receivable securitization and
other expense (income),
net.......................... 589 1,181 1,713 1,369 (140) 1,033
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income before taxes.......... 2,886 14,382 7,464 20,292 4,132 20,184
Income tax expense............. 996 5,058 1,525 7,610 1,606 7,777
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net Income................... $ 1,890 $ 9,324 $ 5,939 $ 12,682 $ 2,526 $ 12,407
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding (in
thousands)................... 13,036 13,731 15,083 18,155 21,368 23,553
Earnings per share............. $ .14 $ .68 $ .39 $ .70 $ .12 $ .53
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Weighted average number of
common shares and equivalents
outstanding (in thousands)... 13,941 14,297 15,574 18,371 21,562 23,944
Earnings per share............. $ .14 $ .65 $ .38 $ .69 $ .12 $ .52
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA
(AT END OF MONTH PERIOD)
Working capital................ $ 48,245 $ 32,566 $ 39,885 $ 38,950 $ 30,240 $ 32,486
Total assets................... 148,573 140,444 138,552 151,892 117,480 134,947
Long-term debt................. 44,870 33,978 48,537 34,704 18,426 13,672
Shareholders' equity........... 37,716 38,622 31,053 44,669 46,723 60,219
31
On February 13, 2003, the Company announced its sales and income for the
quarter and year ended December 31, 2002, as follows:
THREE MONTHS ENDED TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2002 DECEMBER 31, 2002
------------------ -------------------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARES AND
PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS:
Net sales....................................... $117,467 $389,726
Cost of sales................................... 85,211 301,692
-------- --------
Gross margin.................................. 32,256 88,034
Selling, general and administrative expenses.... 23,423 74,684
-------- --------
Income from operations........................ 8,833 13,350
Interest expense, net........................... 371 1,413
Litigation settlement, receivable securitization
and other expense (income), net............... (3,561) (2,972)
-------- --------
Income before income taxes.................... 12,023 14,909
Income tax expense.............................. 4,348 5,344
-------- --------
Net income.................................... $ 7,675 $ 9,565
======== ========
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding (in thousands).................... 12,823 12,983
Earnings per share.............................. $ .60 $ .74
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Weighted average number of common shares and
equivalents outstanding (in thousands)........ 13,696 13,877
Earnings per share.............................. $ .56 $ .69
32
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material terms of the Merger Agreement.
The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Merger Agreement, a
copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as ANNEX A and is incorporated
herein by reference. You are urged to read the entire Merger Agreement as it is
the legal document that governs the Merger.
THE MERGER
The Merger Agreement provides that subject to the conditions summarized
below, Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company. Following the completion
of the Merger, Merger Sub will cease to exist as a separate entity, and the
Company will continue as the surviving corporation.
EFFECTIVE TIME
The Merger will become effective upon the filing of a Certificate of Merger
with the Secretary of State of the State of Ohio in accordance with the Ohio
Revised Code, or at another time as is agreed upon by the Company, TechTronic
and Merger Sub and specified in the certificate of Merger. The time at which the
Merger becomes effective is referred to as the "Effective Time" in this proxy
statement.
MERGER CONSIDERATION
At the Effective Time, each Royal share outstanding immediately before the
Effective Time will be cancelled and automatically converted into the right to
receive $7.37 in cash, without any other payment thereon, with the following
exceptions:
- treasury shares owned by the Company will be cancelled without any
payment thereon; and
- shareholders who have perfected their dissenters' rights will receive
payment in cash of the fair value of their shares in accordance with Ohio
law.
PAYMENT PROCEDURES
Before the Effective Time, Merger Sub will deposit the consideration to be
paid in the Merger with an exchange agent acceptable to the Company and
TechTronic. As soon as practicable after the Effective Time, TechTronic or the
exchange agent will send to each holder of Royal shares a letter of transmittal
and instructions to effect the surrender of the share certificates or other
documentation that represent Royal shares or options, phantom stock rights or
any other security entitled to receive payment under the Merger Agreement, if
any, in exchange for payment of the consideration offered in respect of these
shares or options, phantom stock rights or other security entitled to receive
payment under the Merger Agreement. You should not forward share certificates or
other documentation with the enclosed proxy card. You should surrender
certificates representing Royal shares only after receiving instructions from
the exchange agent or TechTronic.
Each Royal shareholder will be entitled to receive the consideration
offered Royal shareholders, after giving effect to any required tax
withholdings, only upon surrender to the exchange agent of the relevant share
certificates, together with a properly completed letter of transmittal.
TechTronic will not pay interest on the consideration offered to Royal
shareholders. The exchange agent will not make payments to any person who is not
the registered holder of the certificates surrendered unless the certificate is
properly endorsed or otherwise in proper form for transfer. Further, the person
requesting this payment will be required to pay any transfer or other taxes
required as a result of this payment to a person other than the registered
holder of the certificate surrendered, or establish to the satisfaction of the
exchange agent that the tax has been paid or is not payable.
STOCK OPTIONS AND PHANTOM STOCK RIGHTS
The Merger Agreement provides that the Company will take such actions as
are required to adjust the terms of all outstanding options to purchase Royal
shares and all outstanding phantom stock awards in respect of Royal shares, so
that, at the Effective Time, (i) each outstanding option (whether or not then
exercisable or vested) will become fully exercisable and vested and each
outstanding right (whether or not then exercisable) will become fully
exercisable and vested, (ii) each option and right will be cancelled and (iii)
in consideration of such cancellation, each holder of options will receive, for
each Royal share issuable upon the exercise of such options,
33
cash in the amount of $7.37 less the applicable exercise price and each holder
of phantom stock awards will receive for each Royal share issuable in payment
for such award cash in the amount of $7.37. The Merger Agreement further
provides that the Company has agreed not to grant any new options to purchase
Royal shares or phantom stock awards.
NO FURTHER OWNERSHIP RIGHTS IN THE COMPANY
After the Effective Time, the holders of Royal shares will no longer have
any rights as a shareholder, except for the right to either exercise dissenters'
rights as permitted under the Ohio Revised Code or surrender his, her or its
certificates representing the Royal shares in exchange for the right to receive
the consideration offered to Royal shareholders represented by the delivered
certificates at the time of surrender. After the Effective Time, no transfer of
shares shall be made on the share transfer books of the Company except as
contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Any certificates representing Royal shares
presented after the Effective Time for transfer will be cancelled and exchanged
for the right to receive the consideration offered to Royal shareholders.
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
The Merger Agreement provides that the directors and officers of Merger Sub
immediately before the Effective Time will be the directors and officers of the
Company after the Merger.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
The Merger Agreement contains various representations and warranties made
by the Company to TechTronic, Acquiror, and Merger Sub, subject to identified
exceptions, including representations and warranties relating to:
- due incorporation or organization, valid existence, good standing and
requisite power of the Company;
- subsidiaries of the Company;
- capitalization of the Company;
- subject to adoption of the Merger Agreement by holder of two-thirds of
Royal shares outstanding on the Record Date, the authorization,
execution, and delivery of the Merger Agreement by the Company and the
enforceability of the Merger Agreement against the Company;
- absence of any conflict between execution and delivery of the Merger
Agreement and consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement, including the Merger, on the one hand, and the Company's and
its subsidiaries' organizational documents and any contracts and
documents applicable to the Company, its subsidiaries, or their assets,
on the other hand, except for conflicts that would not have a Material
Adverse Effect;
- required consents and approvals by third parties other than Royal
shareholders and including any governmental entities with certain
exceptions for filings that are required by securities and antitrust laws
or would not have a Material Adverse Effect;
- the Company has not incurred since September 30, 2002 any undisclosed
liabilities except for liabilities that would not have a Material Adverse
Effect;
- the accuracy of the information supplied by the Company in this proxy
statement and other documents required to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission in connection with the Merger;
- compliance with laws (including environmental matters) and litigation;
- labor, employment and matters related to the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended and other compliance and compensation
matters (including employee benefit plans);
- filing of tax returns and payment of taxes;
- intellectual property;
- problems with customers and suppliers, if any;
- brokers' and advisors' fees with respect to the Merger;
34
- the opinion of a financial advisor;
- the approval of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by
the Merger Agreement, including the Merger, by the Royal Board;
- the inapplicability of takeover statutes or regulations to the Merger;
- certain business practices;
- real property of the Company and its subsidiaries;
- the Company's properties and accounts;
- material licenses and permits;
- product liability and warranties;
- the enforceability and compliance with material contracts;
- insurance; and
- indebtedness for borrowed funds.
The Merger Agreement contains various representations and warranties made
by TechTronic, Acquiror, and Merger Sub to the Company, subject to identified
exceptions, including representations and warranties relating to:
- due organization, valid existence, good standing and requisite power of
TechTronic, Acquiror and Merger Sub;
- authorization, execution, delivery and enforceability of the Merger
Agreement;
- absence of any conflict between the Merger Agreement and TechTronic's,
Acquiror's and Merger Sub's organizational documents, applicable laws or
judgments, and any other contracts and documents;
- required consents and approvals, including the approval of TechTronic's
shareholders;
- the accuracy of the information supplied by TechTronic, Acquiror and
Merger Sub in this proxy statement and any other documents required to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the
Merger.
The representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement will not survive
beyond the Effective Time.
CONDUCT OF THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS PRIOR TO THE MERGER
From December 16, 2002 to the Effective Time, the Company and its
subsidiaries are required to comply with certain restrictions on their conduct
and operations. These restrictions are described below and apply before the
closing of the Merger, except as otherwise permitted under the Merger Agreement
or to the extent that TechTronic consents in writing, which consent cannot be
unreasonably withheld. In general, the Company will use its reasonable efforts
to conduct business in the Ordinary Course of Business (as defined in the Merger
Agreement) consistent with past practices and in compliance with all Legal
Requirements (as defined in the Merger Agreement).
The Company agreed to use all reasonable efforts to:
- Preserve intact its business organization and relationships.
- Keep its current officers and employees.
- Not make any provision for dividends, stock splits, recapitalizations,
issuances, purchases, or the creation of any lien (as defined in the
Merger Agreement) on or regarding any of its securities, except in
accordance with the Merger Agreement.
- Not amend its articles of incorporation, code of regulations, or other
organizational documents or merge or consolidate with a third party.
- Not acquire or dispose of any material assets, except for purchases in
accordance with a previously approved capital expenditure budget and the
sale of inventory, obsolete equipment for fair market value, and excess
equipment not to exceed $3,000,000 in the aggregate.
35
- Not sell, lease or otherwise encumber any of its properties or assets
other than in the ordinary course of business (as defined in the Merger
Agreement) consistent with past practice.
- Not take any action that would cause the representations and warranties
set forth in the Merger Agreement to no longer be true and correct.
- Not amend, modify or waiver any provision of the Company rights agreement
(as defined in the Merger Agreement) or redeem the rights issued
thereunder, unless the Royal Board has determined in good faith, after
consultation with outside counsel, to permit a Superior Proposal (as
defined in the Merger Agreement and on page below).
- Not make any change in accounting methods or cash management.
- Not increase the compensation of any officers, directors or key employees
(except in the case of non-officers and directors in the Ordinary Course
of Business), expand an existing benefit plan, enter into or modify any
employment or severance agreement with any officer or director or
employee of the Company or its subsidiaries, enter into a collective
bargaining agreement, or enter into a material transaction with any
director, executive officer, or key employee of the Company.
- Not materially modify, amend, or terminate any of the Company's material
contracts.
- Not create or suffer to exist any liens or restrictions with respect to
any of the assets or properties of the Company or its subsidiaries.
- Not make a material tax election or settle or compromise any material
income tax liability.
- Not materially waive or modify any confidentiality or standstill
agreement or make any payments that have not been reserved against in the
Company's most recent consolidated financial statements (or the notes
thereto).
- Not make any payment or incur any liability for the purpose of obtaining
a consent from a third party to the transactions contemplated by the
Merger Agreement.
- Keep in full force and effect the Company's current insurance coverage.
- Not materially accelerate the collection of receivables or defer the
payment of payables.
- Not permit any purchase of Royal shares by the Company or any of its
subsidiaries at a price higher than $7.37 per share.
- Not fail to inform TechTronic of any event that could reasonably be
expected to result in a breach of any representation or warranty in the
Merger Agreement and enter into an agreement or arrangement to do any of
the foregoing.
These restrictions do not apply to any transaction between the Company and any
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In addition, the Company, TechTronic,
and Acquiror have agreed not to take any action that would reasonably be
expected to result in the failure of any of the conditions to the Merger set
forth in the Merger Agreement. The Company and Acquiror will give prompt oral
and written notice to the other party of (i) any event likely to cause a
Material Adverse Change or any representation or warranty to be untrue or
inaccurate or (ii) any failure of the Company, Acquiror, or TechTronic to comply
with the Merger Agreement.
PREPARATION OF PROXY STATEMENT
The Company and TechTronic have agreed that the information provided by
each of them for use in this proxy statement related to the Merger will be true
and correct in all material respects and will not omit any material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make this information not
misleading on the date this proxy is first mailed to Royal shareholders and on
the date of the Special Meeting. Each of the Company, TechTronic, Acquiror, and
Merger Sub has also agreed to correct any information provided by it for use in
this proxy statement that has become false or misleading.
36
NON-SOLICITATION
The Merger Agreement provides that the Company will not, and will not
authorize or permit any of its subsidiaries, officers, directors or employees,
investment bankers, attorneys, accountants or other advisors or representatives,
to directly or indirectly:
- solicit, initiate or encourage the submission of, any Company Takeover
Proposal (as defined below), including by furnishing information; or
- participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding a Company
Takeover Proposal.
For purposes of the Merger Agreement and this proxy statement, a "Company
Takeover Proposal" means any inquiry, proposal or offer from any person relating
to a:
- direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of a business that constitutes
20% or more of the net revenues, net income, or the assets of the Company
and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
- direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of 20% or more of any class of
equity securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries whose
business constitutes 20% or more of the net revenues, net income, or
assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
- tender offer or exchange offer that if consummated would result in any
person beneficially owning 20% or more of any class of equity securities
of the Company or any of its subsidiaries whose business constitutes 20%
or more of the net revenues, net income, or assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole; or
- merger, consolidation, business combination, recapitalization,
liquidation, dissolution, or similar transaction involving the Company or
any of its subsidiaries whose business constitutes 50% or more of the net
revenues, net income, or assets of the Company and its subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, other than the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
After the Royal Board consults with its legal, financial and other advisors
to determine its fiduciary duties, the Company may, before the Special Meeting
and in response to a Superior Proposal that was not solicited and did not result
from a breach of the non-solicitation provision of the Merger Agreement:
- furnish information with respect to the Company and its subsidiaries to
the person making a Superior Proposal and its representatives pursuant to
a confidentiality agreement; and
- participate in discussions or negotiations with the person making a
Superior Proposal and its representatives regarding the Superior
Proposal.
"Superior Proposal" means any bona fide written offer for a Company
Takeover Proposal by a third party that, the Board of Directors of the Company
determines in good faith, has the good faith intent to proceed with negotiations
and the financial and other capabilities to consummate the Company Takeover
Proposal, taking into account, among other things, the legal, financial,
regulatory, and other aspects of such Company Takeover Proposal, (i) on terms
which the Board of Directors of the Company determines in its good faith
judgment (based on the advice of its legal and financial advisors) is more
favorable to the constituencies of the Company that may be considered by the
directors of the Company under Section 1701.59(E) of the Ohio General
Corporation Law, and (ii) that is reasonably capable of being completed.
Furthermore, the Merger Agreement provides that the Royal Board may not,
unless the Merger Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms:
- withdraw or adversely modify, or publicly propose to adversely withdraw
or modify, its approval or recommendation of the Merger Agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Merger;
- approve any letter of intent, agreement in principle, acquisition
agreement or similar agreement providing for any Company Takeover
Proposal; or
- approve or recommend, or publicly propose to approve or recommend, any
Company Takeover Proposal.
In addition, in the event of an unsolicited bona fide Company Takeover
Proposal as described above, the Merger Agreement provides that the Company must
promptly notify TechTronic of any request for information or
37
Company Takeover Proposal and of the material terms of the request or Company
Takeover Proposal. The Company also agreed to keep TechTronic reasonably
informed of the status and details of any request for information or Company
Takeover Proposal.
CONFIDENTIALITY; PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT
TechTronic and the Company have agreed that, except as provided in the
non-solicitation provision, they will not make any additional public disclosures
without the prior consent of the other (which consent may not be unreasonably
withheld) as to the content and timing of this disclosure. However, either party
may make these disclosures as may be required to comply with applicable law,
regulations or New York or Hong Kong Stock Exchange requirements, as long as the
other party is afforded (to the extent practicable) prior notice thereof.
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
The Company has agreed to give TechTronic and its authorized
representatives full access to the offices and other facilities, and to all
books and records, of the Company and its subsidiaries (including access to
perform environmental studies, if deemed necessary or appropriate by Acquiror).
This access is subject to the terms of a confidentiality agreement between
Acquiror and the Company and can only occur after reasonable notice and at
reasonable times without undue disruption to the Company's business. Any review
will be limited to confirming the accuracy of the representations and warranties
of the Company contained in the Merger Agreement.
AGREEMENT TO USE REASONABLE COMMERCIAL EFFORTS
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement (including the
limitations provided in the Merger Agreement regarding the fiduciary duties of
the Royal Board), the Company, TechTronic, Acquiror, and Merger Sub have agreed
to use their respective reasonable commercial efforts to take, or cause to be
taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to be done as promptly as practicable,
all things necessary, proper and advisable under applicable laws and regulations
to consummate and make effective as promptly as practicable the transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement and to cause the conditions to the closing
to be satisfied.
NOTIFICATION OF CERTAIN MATTERS
The Company, on the one hand, and TechTronic, Acquiror, and Merger Sub, on
the other hand, have agreed to promptly notify in writing the other party of:
- the occurrence or non-occurrence of any fact or event that would be
likely to cause:
- any representation or warranty contained in the Merger Agreement to be
untrue or inaccurate in any respect; or
- a Material Adverse Change; and
- any failure of the Company, TechTronic, or Acquiror to comply with or
satisfy any covenant or condition under the Merger Agreement.
It should be noted, however, that notification will not affect the
representations or warranties of, or the remedies available to, any party to the
Merger Agreement.
INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
TechTronic will, and will cause the surviving corporation to, indemnify and
hold harmless the current or former employees, directors, or officers of the
Company and its subsidiaries for all acts or omissions by them in their official
capacities or taken at the request of the Company that occur before the
Effective Time. This indemnity may be limited by Ohio law. Any indemnification
arrangements or agreements of the Company or its subsidiary will survive the
Merger and continue in full force and effect without amendment or modification
except as required by law.
Furthermore, for a period of six years following the Effective Time the
surviving corporation will maintain in effect the Company's current directors'
and officers' liability insurance policy or enter into a policy providing at
least comparable coverage. This coverage must apply to persons who are currently
covered by the Company's policy. However, the surviving corporation is not
required to expend in any one year an amount in excess of
38
200% of the estimated 2003 premium for this insurance. If the coverage can only
be obtained at an annual premium that exceeds this amount, the surviving
corporation will be obligated to obtain as much insurance as can be obtained for
an annual premium not exceeding this amount. This obligation will pass to any
successor of the surviving corporation.
CLOSING DELIVERIES
THE COMPANY
At the closing of the Merger, the Company has agreed to deliver the
following documents:
- a certificate executed on behalf of the Company by its Chief Executive
Officer to the effect that (i) the representations and warranties of the
Company contained in the Merger Agreement are true and correct in all
material respects when made and as of the time of the closing date, as if
again made by the Company at that time (except for representations and
warranties expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case as of that
earlier date), and (ii) the Company has performed and complied in all
material respects with all of its covenants under the Merger Agreement to
be performed by it on or prior to the closing date;
- a certificate of the Company's secretary dated as of the closing date as
to (i) any resolutions of the Company authorizing the execution of,
delivery or performance of the Merger Agreement or any other related
document and (ii) the Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations
of the Company, with any amendments thereto, in effect as of the date of
the Merger Agreement;
- good standing certificates for the Company issued by the Secretary of
State of Ohio;
- resignations of the current directors of the Company effective on the
Effective Time.
TECHTRONIC, ACQUIROR AND MERGER SUB
At the closing of the Merger, TechTronic and Merger Sub have agreed to
deliver the following documents:
- on or before the closing date but before the Effective Time, TechTronic,
Acquiror, or Merger Sub shall have deposited with the exchange agent all
consideration due under the Merger Agreement for Royal shares, options
for Royal shares and phantom stock awards (see "-- Payment Procedures" on
page 33).
- immediately before the Effective Time, TechTronic, Acquiror, or Merger
Sub shall have furnished cashiers checks or wire transfers of funds to
certain executives and officers in the aggregate amount of $2.4 million
(see "Special Factors -- Interest of Certain Persons in the Merger" on
page 25);
- a certificate executed on behalf of TechTronic by its chief executive
officer to the effect that (i) the representations and warranties of
TechTronic, Acquiror, and Merger Sub contained in the Merger Agreement
were accurate and correct in all material respects as of the date of the
Merger Agreement and as of the date of the closing (except for
representations and warranties expressly made as of an earlier date, in
which case as of that earlier date), and (ii) TechTronic, Acquiror, and
Merger Sub have performed in all material respects all of their covenants
under the Merger to be performed by them on or prior to the closing date.
CLOSING CONDITIONS
The closing of the Merger is conditioned upon the satisfaction or waiver by
TechTronic and the Company, on or before the date of the closing of the Merger,
of the following requirements:
- shareholders of the Company and TechTronic shall each have adopted the
Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement, including the Merger;
- all material consents, approvals and actions of, filings with and notices
to any governmental entity that is required to consummate the Merger and
the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement shall have
been obtained in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Acquiror;
- no Restraint affecting the consummation of the Merger or seeking to
prohibit the transactions contemplated under the Merger Agreement shall
be in effect; provided, however, that the party or parties asserting this
condition shall have used its or their commercially reasonable efforts to
prevent the entry of any Restraint and to appeal as promptly as possible
any Restraints that may be entered;
39
- the waiting period (including any extension thereof) applicable under the
HSR Act and any applicable laws of any non-U.S. jurisdiction relating to
anti-trust matters or competition shall have expired or been terminated.
This condition was satisfied on February 20, 2003.
TECHTRONIC
The obligations of TechTronic, Acquiror, and Merger Sub to consummate the
Merger under the Merger Agreement are subject to the satisfaction, at or before
the closing of the Merger, of the following conditions, any one or more of which
may be waived by TechTronic, Acquiror, or Merger Sub (to the extent permitted by
applicable law):
(1) The representations and warranties made by the Company in the Merger
Agreement must be accurate and correct in all material respects when
the Merger closes as if again made by the Company on the closing date
(except for representations and warranties that refer to a specific
date, in which case the representations and warranties must be accurate
and correct in all material respects as of that date);
(2) The Company must have performed or complied with, in all material
respects, all of its obligations required to be performed or complied
with on or before the closing date;
(3) There shall not have been any Material Adverse Change since December
16, 2002;
(4) Not more than 10% of the holders of Royal shares outstanding at the
close of business on the Record Date have demanded their dissenters'
rights for their shares in accordance with Ohio law; and
(5) Delivery of the closing documents by the Company as described under
"-- Closing Deliveries" above.
THE COMPANY
The obligations of the Company to consummate the Merger under the Merger
Agreement are subject to the satisfaction, at or before the closing of the
Merger, of the following conditions, any one or more of which may be waived by
the Company (to the extent permitted by applicable law):
(1) The representations and warranties made by TechTronic, Acquiror and
Merger Sub in the Merger Agreement must be accurate and correct in all
material respects when the Merger closes, as if again made on the
closing date (except for representations and warranties that refer to a
specific date, in which case the representations and warranties must be
accurate and correct in all material respects as of that date);
(2) TechTronic, Acquiror, and Merger Sub must have otherwise performed or
complied with in all material respects all of their obligations under
the Merger Agreement to be performed or complied with on or before the
closing date;
(3) The deposit of funds equal to the aggregate amount due to Royal
shareholders for their shares, due the option and phantom stock award
holders, and due to certain employees for termination of their existing
employment and severance agreements and execution of new employment
agreements; and
(4) Delivery of the closing documents by TechTronic, Acquiror and Merger
Sub as described under "-- Closing Deliveries" above.
TERMINATION; TERMINATION FEE
The Merger Agreement may be terminated at any time before the closing of
the Merger, whether before or after Royal shareholders have adopted it:
(1) By the mutual written consent of Acquiror and the Company;
(2) By Acquiror or the Company if all of the conditions relating to the
other party described above in "--Closing Conditions" above are not
satisfied or waived by Acquiror or the Company on or before May 15,
2003; except that no party has the right to terminate the Merger
Agreement if these conditions were not satisfied because that party
failed to fulfill or breached any of its obligations under the Merger
Agreement;
40
(3) By Acquiror or the Company if anything that would cause, or would be
reasonably likely to give rise to, the failure of any of the conditions
to the obligations of the other party described in "-- Closing
Conditions" above exists and cannot be or has not been cured within 30
days after written notice is given by the other party;
(4) By Acquiror if a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant, or
agreement by the Company results in a Material Adverse Effect and is
not cured within 30 days or cannot be cured;
(5) By the Company if a breach of any representation, warranty, covenant,
or agreement by TechTronic, Acquiror, or Merger Sub that includes
failure to fully fund the amounts described in paragraph 2 of
"-- Closing Conditions" above results in a Material Adverse Effect that
is not cured within 30 days or that cannot be cured;
(6) By either the Company or TechTronic, if Royal Shareholders do not adopt
the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement, including the Merger, upon a vote taken at the Special
Meeting (including any adjournment or postponement thereof) or if any
Restraint is in effect and final;
(7) By the Company in connection with entering into a binding agreement
concerning a Superior Proposal, provided the Company gives notice of
the Superior Proposal to Acquiror as described in "-- Non-
Solicitation" above and pays to TechTronic the termination fee of
$5,300,000 and up to $700,000 of all reasonable out-of-pocket fees and
expenses payable by Acquiror or Merger Sub in connection with the
Merger; or
(8) By Acquiror if (i) a third-party makes a tender offer for 50% or more
Royal shares and within 10 days the Royal Board does not recommend that
Royal shareholders reject this tender offer, (ii) the Company
recommends, authorizes, proposes, or publicly announces an agreement
with a third party to merge, to sell 20% of the consolidated assets of
the Company and its subsidiaries, or to issue, sell, or otherwise
dispose of securities representing 10% or more of the voting power of
the Company, (iii) a third party acquires beneficial ownership of 15%
or more outstanding Royal shares, or (iv) the Royal Board withdraws or
adverse and modifies its approval or recommendation of the Merger
Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement,
including the Merger, or indicates that it would withdraw or adversely
modify its recommendation but for Acquiror's right to then terminate
the Merger Agreement and/or obligate the Company to pay the termination
fee and expenses as described in Paragraph (7) above.
SOURCE AND AMOUNT OF FUNDS
Based on the number of outstanding Shares on the Record Date, as well as
anticipated payments to holders of options to purchase Royal shares and phantom
stock rights, TechTronic will require approximately $105.5 million in cash to
pay Royal shareholders and certain employees the aggregate amount owed under the
Merger Agreement. TechTronic intends to fund this payment through a combination
of its own cash reserves and indebtedness drawn down on the existing credit
facilities. The Company believes that the financing necessary is assured due to
the fact that TechTronic has cash reserves greater than the purchase
consideration.
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF ROYAL SHARES
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
To the Company's knowledge, except as set forth below, no person
beneficially owns more than five percent of outstanding Royal shares. The
following table sets forth each person or entity who, pursuant to SEC rules, had
41
beneficial ownership of 5% or more of the Common Shares of the Company on
February 28, 2003, based upon information furnished to the Company.
AMOUNT AND
NATURE OF
BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP OF PERCENT OF
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER ROYAL SHARES SHARES(1)
------------------------------------ ------------ ----------
Richmont Capital Partners I, L.P. .......................... 2,969,900 23.1%
2400 Dallas Parkway, Suite 230
Plano, Texas 75093
John P. Rochon.............................................. 2,991,400(2) 23.2%
2400 Dallas Parkway, Suite 230
Plano, Texas 75093
E. Patrick Nalley........................................... 1,070,000(3) 8.3%
7005 Cochran Road
Glenwillow, Ohio 44139
Dimensional Fund Advisors................................... 925,900(4) 7.2%
1299 Ocean Avenue
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Kestrel Investment Management Corporation................... 709,000(5) 5.5%
411 Borel Avenue
San Mateo, CA 94402
---------------
(1) Percent of class was calculated based on the number of outstanding Royal
shares as of February 28, 2003 (12,861,052) and the most recent information
provided by the beneficial owner in documents filed with the SEC.
(2) Mr. Rochon is President of the general partner of Richmont Capital Partners
I, L.P. Amount includes 2,969,900 shares owned by Richmond Capital Partners
I, L.P., and 20,000 shares that can be acquired by the exercise of stock
options.
(3) Includes 50,000 shares which can be acquired by the exercise of stock
options.
(4) As of December 31, 2002 pursuant to a Schedule 13(G) dated February 3, 2003,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(5) As of December 31, 2002 pursuant to a Schedule 13(G) dated February 13,
2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the amount of the Company's Common Shares
actually and beneficially owned by the Company's Directors, each of the named
officers, and all the Directors and Executive Officers as a group as of February
28, 2003.
VESTED OPTION
ACTUAL AND PHANTOM
OWNED STOCK AWARD TOTAL PERCENT
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER SHARES SHARES(1) SHARES OF TOTAL(2)
------------------------ --------- ------------- --------- -----------
Michael J. Merriman.................... 222,000 453,982(3) 675,982 5.1%
E. Patrick Nalley...................... 1,020,000 50,000(4) 1,070,000 8.3
Joseph B. Richey, III.................. 200,000 50,000(5) 250,000 1.9
John P. Rochon......................... 2,971,400 20,000(6) 2,991,400 23.2
R. Louis Schneeberger.................. 48,000 50,000(4) 98,000 *
Jack Kahl, Jr.......................... 120,000 20,000(6) 140,000 1.1
Richard C. Farone...................... 2,684 139,707(7) 142,391 1.1
Richard G. Vasek....................... 5,555 146,300(8) 151,855 1.2
David M. Brickner...................... 5,762 76,000(9) 81,762 *
All directors and executive officers as
a group (9 persons).................. 4,595,401 1,005,989(10) 5,601,390 40.4
42
---------------
* Less than 1%.
(1) Shares that can be acquired by the exercise of vested stock options or
receipt of vested phantom stock awards on or prior to March 31, 2003,
without regard to acceleration caused by the Merger.
(2) The percentage of Total is based on the Total Shares owned by the
individual divided by the sum of (i) total outstanding shares as of the
Record Date, plus (ii) the vested option and phantom stock award shares
held by such individual or individuals. The total does not include options
or phantom stock award shares held by any other person.
(3) The aggregate exercise price payable by Mr. Merriman for these shares is
$1,656,250.
(4) The aggregate exercise price payable by each of Messrs. Nalley and
Schneeberger for their respective shares is $183,050.
(5) The aggregate exercise price payable by Mr. Richey for these shares is
$176,250.
(6) The aggregate exercise price payable by each of Messrs. Rochon and Kahl for
their respective shares is $72,500.
(7) The aggregate exercise price payable by Mr. Farone for these shares is
$568,318.
(8) The aggregate exercise price payable by Mr. Vasek for these shares is
$581,688.
(9) The aggregate exercise price payable by Mr. Brickner for these shares is
$324,124.
(10) The aggregate exercise price payable by all directors and executive
officers is $3,817,731.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The SEC allows the Company to incorporate by reference information into
this proxy statement, which means that the Company can disclose important
information to shareholders by referring shareholders to another document filed
separately with the SEC. This proxy statement incorporates by reference the
documents listed below that the Company has previously filed with the SEC. These
documents contain important information about the Company and its respective
business, financial condition and results of operations.
- Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
- Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 is
enclosed with this proxy statement as Annex D. Our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 is also enclosed with this proxy
statement as Annex E. Any statement contained in a document incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement shall be deemed to be modified or superseded
for all purposes to the extent that a statement contained in this proxy
statement modifies or replaces the statement. Any statement so modified or
superseded shall not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to
constitute part of this proxy statement.
We undertake to provide by first class mail, without charge and without one
business day of receipt of any written or oral request, to any person to whom a
copy of this proxy statement has been delivered, a copy of any or all of the
documents referred to above which have been incorporated by reference in this
proxy statement, other than exhibits to the documents, unless the exhibits are
specifically incorporated by reference therein. Requests for copies should be
directed to Royal Appliance Mfg. Co., 7005 Cochran Road, Glenwillow, Ohio 44139,
Attention: Investor Relations Department. The Company will mail requested
documents to shareholders by first class mail, or another equally prompt means,
within one business day after receiving a request.
We are subject to the informational filing requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and, in accordance therewith, are required to
file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the
Securities and Exchange Commission related to our business, financial condition
and other matters. Information as of particular dates concerning our directors
and officers, their remuneration, stock options granted to them, the principal
holders of our securities and any material interest of such persons in
transactions with us is required to be disclosed in proxy statements distributed
to our shareholders and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such
reports, proxy statements and other information should be available for
inspection at the public reference facilities maintained by the Securities and
Exchange Commission at Room 1024, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
20549. Please all the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on
the public reference rooms. Copies of such materials may also be obtained by
mail, upon payment of the
43
Securities and Exchange Commission's customary fees, by writing to its principal
office at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. These materials filed
by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission are also available at the
website of the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.
YOU SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED OR INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE IN THIS DOCUMENT IN DETERMINING HOW TO VOTE. THE COMPANY HAS NOT
AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM THE
INFORMATION CONTAINED IN, ATTACHED TO, OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO, THIS
DOCUMENT. THIS DOCUMENT IS DATED MARCH 14, 2003. YOU SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT THE
INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS ACCURATE AS OF ANY DATE OTHER THAN
THAT DATE, AND THE MAILING OF THIS DOCUMENT SHALL NOT CREATE ANY IMPLICATION TO
THE CONTRARY.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We have made certain forward-looking statements in this proxy statement
(and in documents that are incorporated by reference) that are subject to risks
and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance.
You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements include the information concerning possible or
assumed results of operations. Also, when we use words such as "believe,"
"expect," "anticipate," "plan" or "intend" or similar expressions, we are making
forward-looking statements. You should note that many factors could affect our
future financial results and could cause these results to differ materially from
those expressed in our forward-looking statements. These factors include the
following: (i) the failure of TechTronic or Royal shareholders to adopt the
Merger Agreement and other reasons that could cause the Merger Agreement to
terminate in accordance with its terms; (ii) competition from other consumer
appliance companies; and (iii) seasonality or an economic downturn that could
limit consumer spending.
Further, the Company operates in an industry sector where securities values
may be volatile and may be influenced by economic and other factors beyond the
Company's control. In the context of the forward-looking information provided in
this proxy statement and in other reports, please refer to the discussions
detailed in the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and
Results of Operations included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2001 and its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2002.
OTHER MATTERS
AS OF THE DATE OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT, THE ROYAL BOARD IS NOT AWARE OF ANY
MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED AT THE SPECIAL MEETING OTHER THAN THOSE DESCRIBED IN
THIS PROXY STATEMENT. IF OTHER MATTERS SHOULD PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE SPECIAL
MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENTS OR POSTPONEMENTS THEREOF AND BE VOTED UPON, THE
ENCLOSED PROXIES WILL BE DEEMED TO CONFER DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY ON THE
INDIVIDUALS NAMED AS PROXIES THEREIN TO VOTE THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THE
PROXIES AS TO ANY MATTERS. THE INDIVIDUALS NAMED AS PROXIES MAY ALSO VOTE TO
ADJOURN OR POSTPONE THE SPECIAL MEETING IN ORDER TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL VOTES
FROM SHAREHOLDERS.
Proxies may confer discretionary authority to vote on any matter of which
we receive notice after March 14, 2003, without the matter being described in
the proxy statement for the Special Meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
/s/ RICHARD G. VASEK
--------------------------------------
Richard G. Vasek
Secretary
March 14, 2003
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HOPES THAT SHAREHOLDERS WILL ATTEND THE MEETING.
WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND, YOU ARE URGED TO COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND
RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY IN THE ACCOMPANYING ENVELOPE. A PROMPT RESPONSE WILL
FACILITATE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE MEETING. YOUR PARTICIPATION IS APPRECIATED.
44
ANNEX A
AS AMENDED
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
DATED AS OF
DECEMBER 16, 2002
BY AND AMONG
TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD.,
RAMC HOLDINGS, INC.,
TIC ACQUISITION CORP.,
AND
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
ARTICLE I THE MERGER.............................................................. 1
SECTION 1.1 The Merger.................................................. 1
SECTION 1.2 Closing..................................................... 2
SECTION 1.3 Effective Time.............................................. 2
SECTION 1.4 Effects of the Merger....................................... 2
SECTION 1.5 Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations........... 2
SECTION 1.6 Directors and Officers of the Surviving Corporation......... 2
ARTICLE II CANCELLATION AND CONVERSION OF SHARES; CONSIDERATION................... 2
SECTION 2.1 Effect on Capital Stock..................................... 2
SECTION 2.2 Company Stock Option Plans.................................. 3
SECTION 2.3 Exchange of Certificates; Exchange Agent.................... 3
SECTION 2.4 Certain Adjustments......................................... 4
SECTION 2.5 Dissenters' Rights.......................................... 5
SECTION 2.6 Further Assurances.......................................... 5
ARTICLE III REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES........................................ 5
SECTION 3.1 Representations and Warranties of the Company............... 5
SECTION 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Acquiror, Parent and
Merger Sub.................................................. 17
ARTICLE IV PRE-CLOSING COVENANTS.................................................. 18
SECTION 4.1 Conduct of Business......................................... 18
SECTION 4.2 Other Actions............................................... 20
SECTION 4.3 Advice of Changes........................................... 20
SECTION 4.4 No Solicitation by the Company.............................. 20
SECTION 4.5 Continued Availability of Funds; Evidence of Funds.......... 21
ARTICLE V ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS................................................... 21
SECTION 5.1 Preparation of the Proxy Statement; Shareholders Meeting.... 21
SECTION 5.2 Access to Information; Confidentiality...................... 22
SECTION 5.3 Commercially Reasonable Efforts; Cooperation................ 22
SECTION 5.4 Director, Officer and Employee Indemnification.............. 23
SECTION 5.5 Public Announcements........................................ 24
SECTION 5.6 2002 Year-End Benefits...................................... 24
SECTION 5.7 Delisting................................................... 24
ARTICLE VI CONDITIONS PRECEDENT................................................... 24
SECTION 6.1 Conditions To Each Party's Obligation To Effect The
Merger...................................................... 24
SECTION 6.2 Conditions to Obligations of Acquiror, Parent and Merger
Sub......................................................... 25
SECTION 6.3 Conditions to Obligations of the Company.................... 25
SECTION 6.4 Frustration of Closing Conditions........................... 26
ARTICLE VII TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER..................................... 26
SECTION 7.1 Termination................................................. 26
SECTION 7.2 Effect of Termination....................................... 27
SECTION 7.3 Fees and Expenses........................................... 27
ARTICLE VIII GENERAL PROVISIONS................................................... 28
SECTION 8.1 Survival of Representations and Warranties.................. 28
SECTION 8.2 Notices..................................................... 28
SECTION 8.3 Counterparts................................................ 28
SECTION 8.4 Specific Performance........................................ 29
i
PAGE
----
SECTION 8.5 Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries.............. 29
SECTION 8.6 Governing Law............................................... 29
SECTION 8.7 Assignment.................................................. 29
SECTION 8.8 Consent to Jurisdiction..................................... 29
SECTION 8.9 Interpretation.............................................. 29
SECTION 8.10 Headings.................................................... 29
SECTION 8.11 Severability................................................ 29
SECTION 8.12 Amendment................................................... 29
SECTION 8.13 Extension; Waiver........................................... 30
SECTION 8.14 Schedules................................................... 30
Appendix A -- Definitions
Exhibit 1 -- Voting Agreement
Exhibit 2 -- Form of Company Closing Certificate
Exhibit 3 -- Form of Parent Closing Certificate
ii
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this "Agreement"), dated as of December 16,
2002, among ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO., an Ohio corporation (the "Company"),
TechTronic Industries Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of Hong
Kong ("Parent"), RAMC HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Acquiror"), and
TIC ACQUISITION CORP., an Ohio corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of
Acquiror ("Merger Sub").
RECITALS
A. The respective Boards of Directors of the Company, Acquiror, Parent,
and Merger Sub have approved the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company
(the "Merger"), upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
Agreement, whereby each issued and outstanding common share, without par value,
of the Company ("Company Common Stock"), other than (i) Dissenting Shares, (ii)
any shares owned by any direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company and any
Company Common Stock held in the treasury of the Company, or (iii) owned by
Acquiror or an Affiliate of Acquiror will be converted into the right to receive
the Merger Consideration;
B. The respective Boards of Directors of the Company, Acquiror, Parent,
and Merger Sub have each determined that the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated hereby are consistent with, and in furtherance of, their respective
business strategies and goals;
C. The Company, Acquiror, Parent, and Merger Sub desire to make certain
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in connection with the
Merger and also to prescribe various conditions to the Merger;
D. The Board of Directors of the Company has resolved to recommend the
Merger to the holders of the Company Common Stock, has determined that the
consideration to be paid for each share of Company Common Stock in the Merger is
fair to the holders of such Company Common Stock, and has resolved to recommend
that the holders of such Company Common Stock accept the Merger Consideration
and approve this Agreement and each of the transactions contemplated hereby upon
the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein;
E. Concurrently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement, as a
condition and inducement to Acquiror's, Parent's and Merger Sub's willingness to
enter into this Agreement, certain shareholders of the Company (the "Major
Shareholders") have entered into Voting Agreements, dated as of the date of this
Agreement, in the form attached hereto as EXHIBIT 1 (the "Voting Agreements")
pursuant to which each such Major Shareholder has, among other things, agreed to
vote the Company Common Stock held by such Major Shareholder for the Merger;
F. The Board of Directors of Parent has resolved to recommend the Merger
to the holders of shares of Parent Common Stock and the executive members of the
Board of Directors of Parent have expressed their respective intentions to vote
their shares of Parent Common Stock in favor of the Merger; and
G. Currently with the execution and delivery of this Agreement, as a
condition and inducement to Acquiror's, Merger Sub's and Parent's willingness to
enter into this Agreement, the Company has entered into new employment
agreements with each of the individuals listed on Section 6.3(d) of the Company
Disclosure Schedule, which agreements are effective as of the Effective Time and
which terminate each of those individuals' current employment and severance
agreements. In exchange for the individuals' agreement to terminate their
existing agreements and enter into the new agreements, such individuals will
receive at the Effective Time, in the aggregate, $2.4 million.
Accordingly, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be
legally bound, hereby agree as follows. Capitalized terms used herein shall have
the meanings referred to or set forth in Appendix A hereto.
ARTICLE I
THE MERGER
SECTION 1.1 The Merger. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in this Agreement, and in accordance with the Ohio Statutes, Merger Sub
shall be merged with and into the Company at the Effective
1
Time and the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub shall thereupon cease.
Following the Effective Time, the Company shall be the surviving corporation
(the "Surviving Corporation").
SECTION 1.2 Closing. The closing of the Merger (the "Closing") will take
place at 10:00 a.m. on a date to be specified by the parties, which shall be no
later than the second business day after satisfaction or waiver (subject to
applicable law) of the conditions (excluding conditions that, by their terms,
cannot be satisfied until the Closing Date) set forth in ARTICLE VI, unless
another time or date is agreed to by the parties hereto. The Closing will be
held at the offices of Kahn Kleinman, a legal professional association, 2600
Erieview Tower, 1301 East Ninth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44114, or such other
location as the parties hereto shall agree to in writing. The date on which the
Closing occurs is hereinafter referred to as the "Closing Date."
SECTION 1.3 Effective Time. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement,
as soon as practicable or prior to the Closing Date, the parties shall (i) file
a Certificate of Merger (the "Certificate of Merger") in such form as is
required by and executed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Ohio
Statutes and (ii) make all other filings or recordings required under the Ohio
Statutes. The Merger shall become effective at such time as the Certificate of
Merger is duly filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Ohio, or at
such later date or time as the Company and Acquiror shall agree and specify in
the Certificate of Merger (the date and time the Merger becomes effective being
the "Effective Time").
SECTION 1.4 Effects of the Merger. The Merger shall have the effects set
forth in the Ohio Statutes. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
and subject thereto, at the Effective Time all the property, rights, privileges,
powers and franchises of the Company and Merger Sub shall be vested in the
Surviving Corporation, and all debts, liabilities and duties of the Company and
Merger Sub shall become the debts, liabilities and duties of the Surviving
Corporation.
SECTION 1.5 Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations. Subject to
Section 5.4, the articles of incorporation and code of regulations of Merger Sub
shall be the articles of incorporation and code of regulations, respectively, of
the Surviving Corporation until thereafter changed or amended as provided
therein or by applicable law; provided, however, that the name of the Surviving
Corporation shall be "Royal Appliance Mfg. Co."
SECTION 1.6 Directors and Officers of the Surviving Corporation. The
directors of Merger Sub immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the
directors of the Surviving Corporation and the officers of the Company
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be the officers of the Surviving
Corporation, in each case, until the earlier of their death, resignation or
removal or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified, as
the case may be.
ARTICLE II
CANCELLATION AND CONVERSION OF SHARES; CONSIDERATION
SECTION 2.1 Effect on Capital Stock. As of the Effective Time, by virtue
of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder of any shares of
capital stock of the Company or Merger Sub:
(a) Cancellation of Treasury Stock and Company-Owned Stock. Each
share of Company Common Stock that is (i) owned by any direct or indirect
subsidiary of the Company, (ii) owned by Acquiror or an Affiliate of
Acquiror, or (iii) held in the treasury of the Company shall automatically
be canceled and retired and shall cease to exist, and no consideration
shall be delivered in exchange therefor.
(b) Conversion of Company Common Stock. Subject to SECTION 2.5
(Dissenters' Rights), each issued and outstanding share of Company Common
Stock shall be converted into the right to receive $7.37 in cash (the
"Merger Consideration").
(c) Capital Stock of Merger Sub. At the Effective Time, each share of
common stock, no par value, of Merger Sub issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be converted into one share
of common stock of the Surviving Corporation.
(d) Cancellation and Retirement of Company Common Stock. As of the
Effective Time, all shares of Company Common Stock (other than shares to be
canceled in accordance with SECTION 2.1(A) and Dissenting Shares) shall no
longer be outstanding and shall automatically be canceled and retired and
shall cease to exist, and each holder of a certificate representing any
such shares of Company Common Stock
2
shall cease to have any rights with respect thereto, except the right to
receive the Merger Consideration, without interest, upon surrender of such
certificate in accordance with SECTION 2.3.
SECTION 2.2 Company Stock Option Plans. For purposes of this Agreement,
the term "Option" means each unexercised option, warrant, phantom stock award or
other security (including, without limitation, any "Company Stock Option," as
hereafter defined). The Company shall take all actions necessary to ensure that,
as of the Effective Time, each outstanding Company Stock Option, vested or
unvested, exercisable or non-exercisable, shall be extinguished and converted
into the right to receive a cash amount equal to the product of (x) the excess,
if any, of the Merger Consideration minus the exercise price, if any, of each
such Company Stock Option (the "Option Shares Merger Consideration"), multiplied
by (y) the aggregate number of shares of the Company Common Stock issuable upon
the exercise in full of such Option at the Effective Time. The Company Stock
Option Plans shall terminate as of the Effective Time and the provisions in any
other plan, program or arrangement providing for the issuance or grant of any
other interest in respect of the capital stock of the Company or any Subsidiary
shall be terminated as of the Effective Time. In addition, the Company shall
take all action necessary to ensure that following the Effective Time no
participant in the Company Stock Option Plans or other plans, programs or
arrangements shall have any right thereunder to acquire or participate in
changes in value of equity securities of the Company, the Surviving Corporation,
Merger Sub or any of their respective subsidiaries and to terminate all such
plans effective as of the Effective Time.
SECTION 2.3 Exchange of Certificates; Exchange Agent.
(a) The Parties agree that National City Bank, or such other bank or trust
company which the Parties may designate, shall act as agent (the "Exchange
Agent") of Acquiror for purposes of, among other things, mailing and receiving
transmittal letters and distributing to the Company shareholders (or holders of
Company Stock Options) the proceeds payable to such holders under SECTION 2.1(B)
(Conversion of Company Common Stock) or SECTION 2.2 (Company Stock Option Plans)
above. Immediately prior to the Effective Time, Merger Sub (or the Company, as
the Surviving Corporation) shall deposit, or shall cause to be deposited, with
or for the account of the Exchange Agent, for the benefit of the holders of
Certificates (as defined herein) cash in an aggregate amount (the "Exchange
Fund") equal to the sum of (x) the product of (A) the Merger Consideration
multiplied by (B) the number of shares of Company Common Stock issued and
outstanding at the Effective Time plus (y) the Option Shares Merger
Consideration for all outstanding Options as of the Effective Time.
(b) Exchange Procedures. As soon as reasonably practicable after the
Effective Time, the Exchange Agent shall mail or deliver to each holder of
record of a certificate or certificates or Options grant which immediately prior
to the Effective Time represented outstanding shares of Company Common Stock or
Options (the "Certificates") whose shares or options were converted into the
right to receive the Merger Consideration or Option Shares Merger Consideration
pursuant to SECTION 2.1(B) (Conversion of Company Common Stock) or SECTION 2.2
(Company Stock Option Plans), as applicable, (i) a letter of transmittal (which
shall specify that delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title to the
Certificates shall pass, only upon delivery of the Certificates to the Exchange
Agent and shall be in such form and have such other provisions as the Company
and Acquiror may reasonably specify) and (ii) instructions for use in
surrendering the Certificates in exchange for the Merger Consideration or Option
Shares Merger Consideration, as applicable. Upon surrender of a Certificate for
cancellation to the Exchange Agent, together with such letter of transmittal,
duly executed, and such other documents as may reasonably be required by the
Exchange Agent, the holder of such Certificate shall be entitled to receive in
exchange therefor a check representing the amount of cash such holder has the
right to receive pursuant to the provisions of this ARTICLE II, and the
Certificate so surrendered shall forthwith be canceled. In the event of a
transfer of ownership of Company Common Stock which is not registered in the
transfer records of the Company, a certificate representing the proper number of
shares of Company Common Stock may be issued to a Person other than the Person
in whose name the Certificate so surrendered is registered if such Certificate
is properly endorsed or otherwise in proper form for transfer and the Person
requesting such issuance pays any transfer or other taxes required by reason of
the payment of the Merger Consideration or Option Shares Merger Consideration,
as applicable, to a Person other than the registered holder of such Certificate
or establishes to the satisfaction of Acquiror that such tax has been paid or is
not applicable. Until surrendered as contemplated by this SECTION 2.3, each
Certificate shall be deemed at any time after the Effective Time to represent
only the right to receive upon such surrender the Merger Consideration or Option
Shares Merger Consideration, as applicable, that the holder thereof has the
right to receive in respect of such Certificate pursuant to the provisions of
this ARTICLE II. No interest shall be paid or will accrue on any cash payable to
holders of Certificates pursuant to the provisions of this ARTICLE II.
3
(c) No Further Ownership Rights in Company Common Stock. The Merger
Consideration or Option Shares Merger Consideration, as applicable, shall be
deemed to have been paid in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to the
shares of Company Common Stock, theretofore represented by such Certificates,
and there shall be no further registration of transfers on the stock transfer
books of the Surviving Corporation of the shares of Company Common Stock which
were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after the
Effective Time, Certificates are presented to the Surviving Corporation or the
Exchange Agent for any reason, they shall be canceled and exchanged as provided
in this ARTICLE II, except as otherwise provided by law.
(d) Termination of Exchange Fund. Any portion of the Exchange Fund which
remains undistributed (including interest thereon) to the holders of the
Certificates for six months after the Effective Time shall to the extent
permitted by law, become the property of the Surviving Corporation. Any holders
of the Certificates who have not theretofore complied with this ARTICLE II shall
thereafter look only to the Surviving Corporation, and only as a general
creditor, for payment of their claim for Merger Consideration or Option Shares
Merger Consideration, as applicable, and without interest. If any certificates
representing any Company Common Stock shall not have been surrendered prior to
five years after the Effective Time (or immediately prior to such earlier date
on which any payment in respect thereof would otherwise escheat to or become the
property of any Governmental Entity), the payment in respect of such
certificates shall, to the extent permitted by applicable law, become the
property of the Surviving Corporation, free and clear of all claims or interest
of any person previously entitled thereto.
(e) No Liability. None of the Parties shall be liable to any Person in
respect of any Merger Consideration from the Exchange Fund, delivered to a
public official pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or
similar law.
(f) Investment of Exchange Fund. The Exchange Agent shall invest the
Exchange Fund, as directed by the Surviving Corporation, in (i) direct
obligations of the United States of America, (ii) obligations for which the full
faith and credit of the United States of America is pledged to provide for the
payment of principal and interest, (iii) commercial paper rated the highest
quality by either Moody's Investors Services, Inc. or Standard & Poor's
Corporation, or (iv) certificates of deposit, bank repurchase agreements or
bankers acceptances, of commercial banks with capital exceeding $500 million,
and any net earnings with respect thereto shall be paid to the Surviving
Corporation as and when requested by the Surviving Corporation; provided, that
any such investment or any such payment of earnings shall not delay the receipt
by holders of Certificates of the Merger Consideration or Option Shares Merger
Consideration, as the case may be, or otherwise impair such holders' respective
rights hereunder.
(g) Lost Certificates. If any Certificate shall have been lost, stolen or
destroyed, upon (i) the making of an affidavit of that fact by the Person
claiming such Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed, (ii) evidence that
such Person is the beneficial owner of the Certificate claimed by such Person to
be lost, stolen or destroyed, and (iii) if required by the Surviving
Corporation, the posting by such Person of a bond in such reasonable amount as
the Surviving Corporation may direct as indemnity against any claim that may be
made against it with respect to such Certificate, the Exchange Agent shall issue
in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed Certificate the Merger
Consideration or Option Shares Merger Consideration, as applicable.
(h) Withholding Rights. The Exchange Agent shall be entitled to deduct and
withhold from the consideration otherwise payable pursuant to this Agreement to
any holder of Company Common Stock or Company Stock Options such amounts (each a
"Withholding Amount") as the Exchange Agent, Surviving Corporation, or Acquiror
is required to deduct and withhold with respect to the making of such payment
under the Code (as hereinafter defined), or any provision of state, local or
foreign tax law, including, without limitation, withholdings required in
connection with payments with respect to Company Stock Options held by employees
of the Company. To the extent that amounts are so withheld by the Exchange
Agent, Surviving Corporation, or Acquiror, such withheld amounts shall be
treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to the holder in
respect of which such deduction and withholding was made.
SECTION 2.4 Certain Adjustments. If after the date hereof and on or prior
to the Effective Time, the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock shall be
changed into a different number of shares by reason of any reclassification,
recapitalization, split-up, combination or exchange of shares, or any dividend
payable in stock or other securities shall be declared thereon with a record
date within such period, or any similar event shall occur (any such action, an
"Adjustment Event"), the Merger Consideration shall be adjusted accordingly to
4
provide to the holders of Company Common Stock the same economic effect as
contemplated by this Agreement prior to such reclassification, recapitalization,
split-up, combination, exchange or dividend or similar event.
SECTION 2.5 Dissenters' Rights.
(a) Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, any
shares of Company Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the Effective
Time and held by persons who shall have properly demanded payment of the fair
cash value of such shares of Company Common Stock in accordance with Section
1701.85 of the Ohio Statutes (collectively, the "Dissenting Shares") shall not
be converted into or represent the right to receive the Merger Consideration as
provided in SECTION 2.1(B). Such persons shall be entitled only to such rights
as are granted under Section 1701.85 of the Ohio Statutes, except that all
Dissenting Shares held by persons who fail to perfect or who effectively
withdraw or lose their rights as dissenting shareholders in respect of such
shares under 1701.85 of the Ohio Statutes shall thereupon be deemed to have been
converted into, as of the Effective Time, the right to receive the applicable
portion of the Merger Consideration, without interest thereon, upon surrender of
the certificate therefor in the manner provided in SECTION 2.3.
(b) The Surviving Corporation or the Company shall give Acquiror (i)
prompt notice of any demands by dissenting shareholders received by the Company
or the Surviving Corporation, withdrawals of such demands and any other
instruments served on the Company or the Surviving Corporation and any material
correspondence received by the Surviving Corporation or the Company in
connection with such demands and (ii) the opportunity to participate in all
negotiations and proceedings with respect to such demands. The Surviving
Corporation shall not, except with the prior written consent of Acquiror, make
any payment with respect to any demands for appraisal or offer to settle or
settle any such demands. Any funds paid to dissenting shareholders shall be paid
out of the Exchange Fund to the extent such payment is equal to or less than the
Merger Consideration and, if greater, the excess shall be paid out of the assets
of the Surviving Corporation.
SECTION 2.6 Further Assurances. At and after the Effective Time, the
officers and directors of the Surviving Corporation will be authorized, to
execute and deliver, in the name and on behalf of the Company or Merger Sub, any
deeds, bills of sale, assignments or assurances and (ii) to take and do, in the
name and on behalf of the Company or Merger Sub, any other actions and things to
vest, perfect or confirm of record in the Surviving Corporation any and all
right, title and interest in, to and under any of the rights, properties or
assets acquired or to be acquired by the Surviving Corporation as a result of,
or in connection with, the Merger.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
SECTION 3.1 Representations and Warranties of the Company. Except as set
forth in the disclosure schedule delivered by the Company to Acquiror
simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement (the "Company Disclosure
Schedule"), the Company hereby represents and warrants to Acquiror, Parent, and
Merger Sub as follows:
(a) Organization, Standing and Corporate Power. The Company is a
corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the
laws of the State of Ohio and it has the requisite corporate power and
authority to carry on its business as now being conducted. The Company is
duly qualified or licensed to do business and is in good standing in each
jurisdiction in which the nature of its business or the ownership, leasing
or operation of its properties makes such qualification or licensing
necessary, except for those jurisdictions where the failure to be so
qualified or licensed or to be in good standing individually or in the
aggregate would not have a Material Adverse Effect. The Company has made
available to Acquiror prior to the execution of this Agreement complete and
correct copies of its charter documents, each as amended to date.
(b) Subsidiaries. SECTION 3.1(B) of the Company Disclosure Schedule
contains a list of all the Subsidiaries of the Company. Except as set forth
on SCHEDULE 3.1(B) of the Company Disclosure Schedule, the Company does not
own any stock of, or equity participation in, any Person. Each of the
Company's Subsidiaries is a corporation duly organized, validly existing
and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction in which it is
organized and it has the requisite corporate power and authority to carry
on its business as now being conducted. Each such Subsidiary is duly
qualified or licensed to do business and is in good standing in each
jurisdiction in which the nature of its business or the ownership, leasing
or operation
5
of its properties makes such qualification or licensing necessary, except
for those jurisdictions where the failure to be so qualified or licensed or
to be in good standing individually or in the aggregate would not have a
Material Adverse Effect. The Company has made available to Acquiror prior
to the execution of this Agreement complete and correct copies of its
Subsidiaries' charter documents, each as amended to date. All the
outstanding shares of capital stock of, or other equity interests in, each
Subsidiary (i) have been validly issued and are fully paid and
nonassessable, (ii) are owned directly or indirectly by the Company, free
and clear of all pledges, claims, liens, taxes, charges, community property
interests, conditions, equitable interests, liens, options, rights of first
refusal, encumbrances and security interests of any kind or nature
whatsoever (collectively, "Liens") and (iii) are free of any other
restriction (including any restriction on the right to vote, sell, transfer
or otherwise dispose of such capital stock or other ownership interests),
except in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii) for any Liens or restrictions
that arise under federal or state securities laws or would not,
individually or in the aggregate, have a Material Adverse Effect. There are
no outstanding or authorized options, warrants, calls, subscriptions,
rights or other agreements evidencing the right to purchase or subscribe
for any shares of capital stock of a Subsidiary or obligating such
Subsidiary to issue additional shares.
(c) Capital Structure. The authorized capital stock of the Company
consists of (i) 101,000,000 shares of Company Common Stock and (ii)
1,000,000 shares of preferred stock ("Company Preferred Stock"). At the
close of business on December 13, 2002 (the "Stock Reference Date"): (i)
12,816,452 shares of Company Common Stock were issued and outstanding; (ii)
13,102,800 shares of Company Common Stock were held by the Company in its
treasury; and (iii) 2,758,540 shares of Company Common Stock were subject
to outstanding employee, consultants and directors stock options to
purchase Company Common Stock or rights to receive Company Common Stock
upon exercise of phantom stock awards (collectively, the "Company Stock
Options") granted pursuant to the Company's incentive plans (collectively,
the "Company Stock Plans"). On the Stock Reference Date, no shares of the
Company Preferred Stock were issued or outstanding. All outstanding shares
of capital stock of the Company are, and all shares which may be issued
will be, when issued, duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable and not subject to preemptive rights. Except (i) for changes
since the Stock Reference Date resulting from the issuance of shares of
Company Common Stock pursuant to the Company Stock Options and (ii) for
outstanding rights issued pursuant to the Company Rights Agreement as
defined herein, there are not issued, reserved for issuance or outstanding
(A) shares of capital stock or other voting securities of the Company, (B)
securities of the Company convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable
for shares of capital stock or voting securities of the Company or (C)
warrants, calls, options or other rights to acquire from the Company or any
Subsidiary any capital stock or voting securities of the Company or any
Subsidiary. There are no outstanding obligations of the Company or any
Subsidiary to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any such securities.
Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is a party to any voting agreement
with respect to the voting of any such securities. Except as shown in
SECTION 3.1(C) of the Company Disclosure Schedule, there are no outstanding
(A) securities of the Company or any Subsidiary convertible into or
exchangeable or exercisable for shares of capital stock or other voting
securities or ownership interests in any Subsidiary, (B) warrants, calls,
options or other rights to acquire from the Company or any Subsidiary, and
no obligation of the Company or any Subsidiary to issue, any capital stock,
voting securities or other ownership interests in, or any securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any capital stock,
voting securities or ownership interests in, any Subsidiary or (C)
obligations of the Company or any Subsidiary to repurchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire any such outstanding securities of Subsidiaries or to
issue, deliver or sell, or cause to be issued, delivered or sold, any such
securities.
(d) Authority; No Conflict. The Company has all requisite corporate
power and authority to enter into this Agreement and, subject to the
Company Shareholder Approval (as defined in SECTION 3.1(S)), to consummate
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The execution and delivery
of this Agreement by the Company and the consummation by the Company of the
transactions contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all necessary
corporate action on the part of the Company, subject to the Company
Shareholder Approval. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered
by the Company and, assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by
Acquiror, Parent, and Merger Sub, constitutes a legal, valid and binding
obligation of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance
with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer,
reorganization, moratorium and similar laws of general applicability
relating to or affecting the rights of creditors and to general principles
of equity. Except as shown on SECTION 3.1(D) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule, the execution and delivery of this
6
Agreement does not, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement and compliance with the provisions of this Agreement will
not, conflict with, or result in any violation of, or default (with or
without notice or passage of time, or both) under, or give rise to a right
of termination, cancellation or acceleration of any obligation or loss of a
benefit under, or result in the creation of any Lien upon any of the
properties or assets of the Company or any of its subsidiaries under (i)
the articles of incorporation or code of regulations of the Company or the
comparable organizational documents of any of its Subsidiaries, (ii) any
loan or credit agreement, note, bond, mortgage, indenture, lease or other
agreement, instrument, permit, concession, franchise, license or similar
authorization applicable to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or their
respective properties or assets or (iii) subject to the governmental
filings and other matters referred to in SECTION 3.1(E) applicable to the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or their respective properties or
assets, other than, in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii), any such
conflicts, violations, defaults, rights, losses or Liens that individually
or in the aggregate would not have a Material Adverse Effect.
(e) Consents. No Consent or approval of any Third Party is required
in connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the
Company or the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated
hereby, except the Company Shareholder Approval. No consent, approval,
order or authorization of, action by or in respect of, or registration,
declaration or filing with, any federal, state, local, municipal or foreign
government, any court, administrative, regulatory or other governmental
agency, commission or authority or any non-governmental U.S. or foreign
self-regulatory agency, commission or authority or any arbitral tribunal
(each, a "Governmental Entity") or other Legal Requirement is required by
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries in connection with the execution and
delivery of this Agreement by the Company or the consummation by the
Company of the transactions contemplated hereby, except for: (1) the filing
with the SEC of (A) a proxy statement relating to the Company Shareholders
Meeting (the "Proxy Statement"), and (B) such reports under Sections 13(a),
13(d), 13(e), 15(d) or 16(a) of the Exchange Act, as may be required in
connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby;
(2) the filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of
the State of Ohio; (3) the filing of a pre-merger notification and report
form by the Company under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act
of 1976, as amended ("HSR Act"); (4) such filings, consents, approvals,
orders or authorizations, if any, required to be made or obtained pursuant
to the laws of any non-U.S. jurisdiction relating to antitrust matters or
competition ("Foreign Antitrust Laws"); and (5) such consents, approvals,
orders or authorizations the failure of which to be made or obtained
individually or in the aggregate would not (x) have a Material Adverse
Effect or (y) reasonably be expected to materially impair or delay the
ability of Company to perform its obligations under this Agreement.
(f) Reports; Undisclosed Liabilities.
(i) The Company has filed all required reports, schedules, forms,
statements and other documents (including exhibits and all other
information incorporated therein) with the SEC since January 1, 2001
(the "Company SEC Documents"). As of their respective dates, the Company
SEC Documents complied in all material respects with the requirements of
the Securities Act, or the Exchange Act, as the case may be, and the
rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder applicable to
such Company SEC Documents, and none of the Company SEC Documents when
filed, declared effective or mailed (as the case may be) contained any
untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading. The financial statements of the Company (including
the related schedules and notes thereto) included in the Company SEC
Documents (or incorporated therein by reference) comply as to form, as
of their respective dates of filing with the SEC, in all material
respects with applicable accounting requirements and the published rules
and regulations of the SEC with respect thereto, have been prepared in
accordance with GAAP (except, in the case of unaudited statements, as
permitted by Form 10-Q of the SEC) applied on a consistent basis during
the periods involved (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto)
and fairly present in all material respects the consolidated financial
position of the Company and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of the
dates thereof and the consolidated statement of operations, cash flows
and shareholders' equity for the periods then ended (subject, in the
case of unaudited statements, to normal year-end audit adjustments).
(ii) As of September 30, 2002, the Company has no Indebtedness or
other liabilities, except for liabilities, including Indebtedness: (a)
reflected or reserved for on the Balance Sheet as of such date or
7
disclosed in the notes thereto (or in the notes of the Company's audited
financial statements as of December 31, 2001 if GAAP does not require
such notes in interim financial statements), (b) relating to performance
obligations, under Contracts in accordance with the terms and conditions
thereof which are not required by GAAP to be reflected on such Balance
Sheet, (c) arising since September 30, 2002, which are both: (x)
consistent with the past practices of the Company and is taken in the
ordinary course of the normal day-to-day operations of the Company; and
(y) similar in nature and magnitude to liabilities customarily incurred,
without specific authorization of the Board of Directors, in the
ordinary course of the normal day-to-day operations of other Persons
that are in the same line of business as the Company (in the "Ordinary
Course of Business"), or (d) which, individually or in the aggregate,
would not have a Material Adverse Effect.
(g) Company Proxy Materials. All of the information supplied by the
Company for inclusion in the Definitive Proxy Statement referred to in
SECTION 5.1(a) will not, on the date when the Definitive Proxy Statement is
first mailed to the Company's shareholders and the Definitive Proxy
Statement, as then amended or supplemented, will not, on the date of the
Company Shareholders Meeting referred to in SECTION 5.1(b) hereof or on the
Closing Date, contain any statement which is false or misleading with
respect to any material fact or omit to state any material fact required to
be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The
Company makes no representation or warranty regarding information furnished
by Acquiror, Parent, or Merger Sub for inclusion in the Definitive Proxy
Statement (or any amendment or supplement thereto). The Definitive Proxy
Statement will comply as to form and, with respect to information supplied
or to be supplied in writing by or on behalf of the Company for inclusion
in the Definitive Proxy Statement, substance, in all material respects,
with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the applicable rules and
regulations of the SEC thereunder.
(h) Absence of Certain Changes or Events. Except for liabilities
incurred in connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated
hereby or disclosed in the Company Disclosure Schedule, the Company and its
Subsidiaries have since December 31, 2001 conducted their business only in
the ordinary course, and there has not been (1) any declaration, setting
aside or payment of any dividend or other distribution (whether in cash,
stock or property) with respect to any of the Company's capital stock; (2)
any split, combination or reclassification of any of the Company's capital
stock or any issuance or the authorization of any issuance of any other
securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for shares of the
Company's capital stock, except for issuances of Company Common Stock upon
the exercise of Company Stock Options in accordance with their present
terms or Company Stock Options issued in accordance with the terms of the
Company Stock Plans; (3)(A) any granting by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries after December 31, 2001 to any current or former director,
executive officer or other key employee of the Company or its Subsidiaries
of any increase in compensation, bonus or other benefits, except for normal
increases in the Ordinary Course of Business or as was required under any
employment agreements in effect as of December 31, 2001, (B) any granting
by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries after December 31, 2001 to any
such current or former director, executive officer or key employee of any
increase in severance or termination pay, or (C) any entry by the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries after December 31, 2001 into, or any amendment
of, any employment, deferred compensation, consulting, severance,
termination or indemnification agreement with any such current or former
director, executive officer or key employee; (4) except insofar as may have
been disclosed in the Company Disclosure Schedule or required by a change
in GAAP, any change in accounting methods, principles or practices by the
Company materially affecting its assets, liabilities, prospects or
business; (5) any tax election that individually or in the aggregate would
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect or any settlement
or compromise of any material income tax liability; (6) any change in the
business, assets, financial condition or results of operations of the
Company or its Subsidiaries or any other event which in any such case has
had or could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; (7)
any damage, destruction or loss, whether covered by insurance or not, with
respect to any of the assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
having a Material Adverse Effect; (8) an entry into any agreement,
commitment or transaction by the Company or any Subsidiary which is
material to the Company and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole; (9) any
change in the terms and conditions of the Company Stock Option Plans; (10)
any redemption or other acquisition of Company Common Stock by the Company
or any of the Subsidiaries or any declaration or payment of any dividend or
other distribution in cash, stock or property with respect to Common Stock,
except for purchases heretofore made pursuant to the terms of the Company's
employee
8
benefit plans; (11) any revaluation by the Company of any asset (including,
without limitation, any writing down of the value of inventory or writing
off of notes or accounts receivable), other than in the Ordinary Course of
Business; (12) (A) any settlement or compromise by the Company or any
Subsidiary of any claim, litigation or other legal proceeding, other than
in the Ordinary Course of Business and in an amount less than $100,000 or
(B) any payment, discharge or satisfaction by the Company or any Subsidiary
of any other claims, liabilities or obligations (absolute, accrued,
asserted or unasserted, contingent or otherwise), other than in the
Ordinary Course of Business and consistent with past practice or with
respect to any other such claims, liabilities or obligations reflected or
reserved against in, or contemplated by, the consolidated financial
statements (or the notes thereto) of the Company; or (13) any agreement or
commitment, whether in writing or otherwise, to take any action of the type
described in this SECTION 3.1(h). Since December 31, 2001, the Company and
the Subsidiaries have conducted their respective businesses in all material
respects only in the Ordinary Course of Business, consistent with past
custom and practice.
(i) Compliance with Applicable Laws; Litigation. The Company and its
Subsidiaries hold all permits, licenses, variances, exemptions, orders,
registrations and approvals of all Governmental Entities which are required
for the ownership or lease of the Real Property or the operation of the
businesses of the Company and its Subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company
Permits"), except where the failure to have any such Company Permits
individually or in the aggregate would not have or reasonably be expected
to have a Material Adverse Effect. The Company and its Subsidiaries are and
since January 1, 2002 have been in compliance with the terms of the Company
Permits and all Legal Requirements, except where the failure so to comply
individually or in the aggregate would not have a Material Adverse Effect.
The Company has not received any notice or other communication (whether
oral or written) from any Governmental Entity or any other Person regarding
(1) any actual, alleged, possible, or potential violation of, or failure to
comply with, any Legal Requirement or Company Permit, or (2) any actual,
alleged, possible, or potential obligation on the part of the Company to
undertake, or to bear all or any portion of the cost of, any remedial
action of any nature, nor to the Company's Knowledge is there any basis for
any such notice or other communication, other than, in each case, those the
outcome of which individually or in the aggregate would not reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
(j) Labor Matters.
(i) Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to
any collective bargaining or other labor union contract applicable to
Persons employed by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and no
collective bargaining agreement is being negotiated by the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries. As of the date of this Agreement, there is no
labor dispute, strike or work stoppage against the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened
which may interfere with the respective business activities of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries. As of the date of this Agreement,
(x) neither the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, nor any of their
respective representatives or employees, has committed any unfair labor
practice in connection with the operation of the respective businesses
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, and (y) there is no charge or
complaint against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries by the National
Labor Relations Board or any comparable governmental agency pending or,
to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened in writing.
(ii) SECTION 3.1(j) of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth
all employee benefit plans ("Company Benefit Plans") as defined in
Section 3(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
("ERISA") and all other employee benefit arrangements or payroll
practices, including, without limitation, any such arrangements or
payroll practices providing severance pay, sick leave, vacation pay,
salary continuation for disability, retirement benefits, deferred
compensation, bonus pay, incentive pay, stock options or other
stock-based compensation, hospitalization insurance, medical insurance,
life insurance, scholarships or tuition reimbursements, maintained by
the Company or to which the Company is obligated to contribute for
employees, individuals other than Employees, or former employees. Each
of the employee benefit plans, practices and arrangements set forth on
SECTION 3.1(j) of the Company Disclosure Schedule shall hereafter be
referred to as a "Plan" or "Plans" as the context may require.
(iii) Copies of the following documents, with respect to each of
the Plans, as applicable, have been delivered to Acquiror by the
Company: (i) all plan and related trust documents, and amendments
9
thereto; (ii) the most recent IRS Form 5500; (iii) the last IRS
determination letter; (iv) summary plan descriptions; and (v) the most
recent actuarial report.
(iv) Neither the Company nor any trade or business (whether or not
incorporated) which has been under common control or treated as a single
employer with the Company under Section 414(b), (c) or (m) of the Code
(an "ERISA Affiliate") has incurred, or is reasonably likely to incur,
any liability under Title IV of ERISA or Section 412 of the Code and
none of the Plans is a Multiemployer Plan, as defined in Section 3(37)
of ERISA. Neither the Company nor any ERISA Affiliate has incurred any
Liability resulting from a complete or partial withdrawal from any
Multiemployer Plan, and none of them has incurred, or is reasonably
likely to incur, any liability due to the termination or reorganization
of a Multiemployer Plan which has not been satisfied in full, and to the
Company's Knowledge, no event has occurred that would subject the
Company or any ERISA Affiliate to any such liability.
(v) Each Plan complies with, and has been established, operated and
administered in accordance with its terms and the requirements of,
ERISA, the Code and other Legal Requirements and, there are no material
pending or, to Company's Knowledge, threatened claims by, on behalf of
or involving any plan administrator or any plan trustee (other than
routine claims for benefits).
(vi) Neither the Company nor any ERISA Affiliate has incurred any
liability for any tax or penalty imposed by Section 4975 of the Code or
Section 502(i) of ERISA with respect to any Plan.
(vii) Each Plan which is intended to qualify under Section 401(a)
of the Code has received an IRS determination letter concluding that
such Plan so qualifies in form, and no event has occurred and no
condition exists that, to the Company's Knowledge, would cause such Plan
to lose its qualified status.
(viii) Except as set forth on SECTION 3.1(j) of the Company
Disclosure Schedule or as may be required under Section 4980B of the
Code, or Section 601 of ERISA, the Company does not have any liability
for post-retirement medical or life insurance benefits or coverage for
any employee or former employee or any dependent of any such employee or
former employee.
(ix) Except as set forth on SECTION 3.1 of the Company Disclosure
Schedule, the consummation of the Merger will not result in any increase
in the amount of compensation or benefits or accelerate the vesting or
timing of payment of any compensation or benefits payable by the Company
to or in respect of any employee or former employee or the beneficiary
or dependent of any such employee or former employee under any Plan or
Contract.
(x) Except as set forth in SECTION 3.1(j) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule, and assuming, with the permission of the Parent, Acquiror and
Merger Sub, for the purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code only, that
none of Acquiror, Parent or Merger Sub, prior to January 1, 2004, will
issue any class of common equity securities required to be registered
under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, no
amount payable to any Employee or former Employee will fail to be
deductible for Federal income tax purposes by reason of Section 162(m)
or Section 280G of the Code.
(xi) The Company has no separate Plans for the benefit of the
Company's non-United States employees or United States employees located
in a foreign jurisdiction.
(k) Taxes.
(i) Except as otherwise disclosed on Section 3.1(k) of the Company
Disclosure: (1) the Company has filed (or joined in the filing of) when
due all reports, returns, information returns, forms, declarations,
claims for refund, statements or other information (including any
amendments thereto and including any schedule or statement thereto)
filed or maintained, or required to be filed or maintained, in
connection with the calculation, determination, assessment or collection
of any Tax and shall include any amended returns required as a result of
examination adjustments made by the Internal Revenue Service or other
Governmental Entity (each, "Tax Return") required by applicable Legal
Requirements to be filed with respect to the Company and all Taxes shown
to be due on such Tax Returns have been paid; (2) all such Tax Returns
were true, correct and complete as of the time of each such filing; (3)
all Taxes relating to periods ending on or before the date hereof owed
by the Company (whether or not shown on any Tax Return) and required to
have been paid, have been paid (except for Taxes which are being
contested in good faith in appropriate proceedings diligently
conducted); (4) any liability of the Company for Taxes not yet due and
payable, or which are being contested in good faith in appropriate
10
proceedings diligently conducted, has been provided for on the financial
statements of the Company in accordance with GAAP; (5) there is no
action, suit, proceeding, investigation, audit or claim now pending
against, or with respect to, the Company in respect of any Tax or
assessment, nor is any claim for additional Tax or assessment asserted
by any Governmental Entity; (6) since January 1, 1999, no claim has been
made by any Governmental Entity in a jurisdiction where the Company does
not currently file a Tax Return that it is or may be subject to Tax by
such jurisdiction, nor to the Company's Knowledge is any such assertion
threatened; (7) there is no outstanding request for any extension of
time within which to pay any Taxes or file any Tax Returns; (8) there
has been no waiver or extension of any applicable statutes of limitation
for the assessment or collection of any Taxes of the Company; (9) the
Company is not a party to any agreement, whether written or unwritten,
providing for the payment of Taxes, payment for Tax losses, entitlements
to refunds or similar Tax matters; (10) no ruling with respect to Taxes
(other than a request for determination of the status of a qualified
pension plan) has been requested by or on behalf of the Company; (11)
the Company has withheld and paid all material Taxes required to be
withheld in connection with any amounts paid or owing to any employee,
creditor, independent contractor or other third party; (12) no property
of the Company is "tax-exempt use property" within the meaning of
Section 168(h) of the Code; (13) the Company is not a party to any lease
made pursuant to former Section 168(f)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1954; (14) the Company has not filed any agreement or consent under
Section 341(f) of the Code; and (15) the Company has not been a United
States real property holding corporation within the meaning of Section
897(c)(2) of the Code during the applicable period specified in Section
897(c)(1)(A)(ii) of the Code.
(ii) Except as disclosed in 3.1(k) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule and assuming, with the permission of the Parent, Acquiror and
Merger Sub, for the purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code only, that
none of Acquiror, Parent or Merger Sub, prior to January 1, 2004, will
issue any class of common equity securities required to be registered
under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: (1)
any amount that could be received (whether in cash or property or the
vesting of property) as a result of the Transactions by any employee,
officer or director of the Company who is a "disqualified individual"
(as such term is defined in proposed Treasury Regulation sec. 1.280G-1)
under any employment, severance or termination agreement, other
compensation arrangement or benefit plan currently in effect would not
be characterized as an "excess parachute payment" (as such term is
defined in Section 280(G)(b)(1) of the Code); and (2) the disallowance
of a deduction under Section 162(m) of the Code for employee
remuneration will not apply to any amount paid or payable by the Company
under any Contract, benefit plan, program, arrangement or understanding
currently in effect.
(l) Environmental Matters. Except as disclosed in SECTION 3.1(l) of
the Company Disclosure Schedule, (i) the Company and its Subsidiaries and,
to the Knowledge of the Company, all real property owned, leased or
operated by the Company and its Subsidiaries are in compliance with
Environmental Laws, except as would not have or would not reasonably be
likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect; (ii) the Company and its Subsidiaries have obtained and currently
possess and maintain all permits required by Environmental Laws
(collectively, "Company Environmental Permits") for each of their
respective operations, all such Company Environmental Permits are in good
standing, and the Company and its Subsidiaries are in compliance with the
terms and conditions of such Company Environmental Permits, except in each
such case as would not have or would not reasonably be likely to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect; (iii) neither
the Company and its Subsidiaries nor any real property currently or, to the
Knowledge of the Company, formerly owned, leased or operated by the Company
or its Subsidiaries is subject to any pending or, to the Knowledge of the
Company, threatened Environmental Claim; (iv) neither the Company nor any
of its Subsidiaries has generated, arranged for the disposal of or
otherwise caused to be disposed of any Hazardous Material at any off-site
location at which the Company and its Subsidiaries would reasonably be
expected to be liable for undertaking or paying for any investigation or
any other action to respond to the release or, to the Knowledge of the
Company, threatened release of any Hazardous Material or would reasonably
be expected to be required to pay natural resource damages, except in any
such case as would not have or would not reasonably be likely to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect; (v) no Company
property or any property currently or, to the Knowledge of the Company,
formerly owned, leased or operated by the Company and its Subsidiaries has
been the subject of any treatment, storage, disposal,
11
accumulation, generation, or release of Hazardous Materials in any manner
which would reasonably be expected to give rise to liability under
Environmental Laws or need to undertake any action to respond to such
Hazardous Materials, except as would not have or would not reasonably be
likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect; (vi) there are no wetlands at any of the Company properties nor is
any Company property subject to any current or, to the Knowledge of the
Company, threatened environmental deed restriction, use restriction,
institutional or engineering control, except as would not have or would not
reasonably be likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect; (vii) the Company has neither expressly, nor by operation
of law, assumed or undertaken any liability arising under or related to any
Environmental Claim; (viii) the Company is not required to give notice of
or record or deliver to any Governmental Agency an environmental disclosure
document or statement by virtue of the transactions set forth herein and
contemplated hereby; (ix) the Company and its Subsidiaries have made
available to Parent all environmental audits, reports and other material
environmental documents in their possession relating to their current and,
to the extent the Company or its Subsidiaries have Knowledge that they are
potentially liable, their formerly owned or operated properties, facilities
or operations; (viii) no capital expenditures are presently required to
maintain or achieve compliance with Environmental Laws, except as would not
have or would not reasonably be likely to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on the Company; and (ix) to the
Knowledge of the Company, there are no underground storage tanks,
polychlorinated biphenyls ("PCB") or PCB-containing equipment, except for
PCB or PCB-containing equipment owned by utility companies, or asbestos or
asbestos-containing materials at any Company property, except as would not
have or would not reasonably be likely to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
As used in this Agreement:
"Environmental Claims" means any and all administrative,
regulatory, judicial or third-party claims, demands, notices of
violation or non-compliance, directives, proceedings, investigations,
orders, decrees, judgments or other allegations of noncompliance with or
liability or potential liability relating in any way to any
Environmental Law or any Company Environmental Permit.
"Environmental Laws" means all applicable federal, state, and local
Laws, rules and regulations, orders, judgments, decrees and other legal
requirements including, without limitation, common law relating to
pollution or the regulation and protection of human health, safety, the
environment or natural resources, including, but not limited to, the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980, as amended (42 U.S.C. Sec. 9601 et seq.); the Hazardous Materials
Transportation Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. Sec. 180 et seq.); the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. Sec.
136 et seq.); the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended (42
U.S.C. Sec. 6901 et seq.); the Toxic Substances Control Act, as amended
(42 U.S.C. Sec. 7401 et seq.); the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C.
Sec. 740 et seq.); the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended
(33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.); the Occupational Safety and Health Act,
as amended (29 U.S.C. Sec. 651 et seq.); the Safe Drinking Water Act, as
amended (42 U.S.C. Sec. 300f et seq.); and their state and local
counterparts or equivalents and any transfer of ownership notification
or approval statute.
"Hazardous Material" means all substances, pollutants, chemicals,
compounds, wastes, including, without limitation, petroleum and any
fraction thereof, and bacteria, mold, fungi or other toxic growth,
either regulated under Environmental Laws or otherwise potentially
injurious to human health and the environment.
(m) Opinion of Financial Advisor. The Company has received the
opinion of its Financial Advisor, to the effect that, as of the date of its
opinion, the Merger Consideration is fair from a financial point of view to
the holders of shares of Company Common Stock.
(n) Takeover Statutes. The Company's Board of Directors, at a meeting
duly called and held, has approved, for purposes of Chapter 1704 of the
Ohio Revised Code, the Merger and the acquisition by Acquiror of the shares
of common stock of the Surviving Corporation pursuant to the Merger. As of
the date of this Agreement, except for Chapter 1704 of the Ohio Revised
Code and Section 1701.831 of the Ohio Law, no "fair price," "business
combination," "moratorium," "control share acquisition" or other anti-
takeover statute or similar statute or regulation enacted by any state
apply to the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
12
(o) Finders' or Advisors' Fees. Except for its Financial Advisor,
there is no investment banker, broker, finder or other intermediary which
has been retained by or is authorized to act on behalf of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries who might be entitled to any fee or commission in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(p) Intellectual Property; Software.
(i) Except in each case where the failure would not, individually
or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect, (1) the Company and its Subsidiaries own all right, title and
interest in or have valid and enforceable rights to use, by license or
other agreements, all of the Intellectual Property that is currently
used in the conduct of the Company's or any of its Subsidiary's
business, free of all liens, pledges, charges, options, rights of first
refusal, security interests or other encumbrances of any kind, (2) no
action, claim, arbitration, proceeding, audit, hearing, investigation,
litigation or suit (whether civil, criminal, administrative,
investigative or informal) has commenced, been brought or heard by or
before any Governmental Entity or arbitrator or is pending or is
threatened in writing by any third Person with respect to any
Intellectual Property owned by such third Person or the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries in connection with the business as currently
conducted, including any claim or suit that alleges that any such
Intellectual Property owned by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
infringes, impairs, dilutes or otherwise violates the rights of others,
and the Company and its Subsidiaries are not subject to any outstanding
injunction, judgment, order, decree, ruling, charge, settlement, or
other dispute involving any third Person's Intellectual Property, (3)
neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has threatened or
initiated any claim or action against any third party with respect to
any Intellectual Property, and (4) the Company has no Knowledge of any
material conflicts with or infringements of any Intellectual Property of
any third Person.
(ii) For purposes of this Agreement, "Intellectual Property" means
all (1) inventions, discoveries, processes, designs, techniques,
developments, technology, and related improvements, whether or not
patentable; (2) United States and foreign issued patents and
applications therefor and all divisionals, reissues, renewals,
registrations, confirmations, re-examinations, certificates of
inventorship, extensions, continuations and continuations-in-part
thereof and all rights of priority therein; (3) United States, state and
foreign trademarks, trade dress, service marks, service names, trade
names, brand names, logo or business symbols, whether registered or
unregistered, and pending applications (including intent to use
applications) to register the foregoing, including all extensions and
renewals thereof and all goodwill associated therewith; (4) United
States and foreign copyrights and moral rights in writings, designs,
software, mask works or other works, whether registered or unregistered,
and pending applications to register the same, (5) technical,
scientific, and other know-how, trade secrets, methods, processes,
practices, formulas and techniques, computer software programs and
software systems, including all databases, compilations, tool sets,
compilers, higher level or "proprietary" languages, related
documentation and materials, whether in interpretive code, source code,
object code or human readable form; (6) rights of publicity and privacy,
"name and likeness" rights and other similar rights; (7) books and
records kept in the ordinary course of the business describing or used
in connection with any of the foregoing; and (8) claims or causes of
action arising out of or related to past, present or future infringement
or misappropriation of any of the foregoing. Without limiting the
foregoing, the Intellectual Property shall include the United States and
foreign issued patents, patent applications, trademark registrations,
trademark applications, copyright registrations and copyright
applications, and the right to register the domain names as set forth in
the Company Disclosure Schedule
(q) Problems with Customers and Suppliers.
(i) Section 3.1(q) of the Company Disclosure Schedule lists each of
the Company's customers whose purchases from the Company constituted
greater than 10% of the Company's revenue for the year ended December
31, 2001 and the nine months ended September 30, 2002 (each a "Major
Customer") and the dollar amount of business done with each Major
Customer in each such period. Section 3.1(q) of the Company Disclosure
Schedule further lists each of the Company's vendors and suppliers, the
dollar value of purchases constituted greater than 10% of the Company's
revenue for the year ended December 31, 2001 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2002 (each a "Major Supplier"), and the dollar amount of
business done with each Major Supplier in each such period. The Company
has furnished Acquiror, Parent and Merger Sub with complete and accurate
copies or
13
descriptions of all current agreements (written or unwritten) with such
Major Customers and Major Suppliers. Except as set forth on Section
3.1(q) or the Company Disclosure Schedule, (1) the Company is not
engaged in a material dispute with any Major Customer or Major Supplier,
(2) there has been no material adverse change in the business
relationship of the Company with any Major Customer or Major Supplier
since September 30, 2002, and (3) no Major Customer or Major Supplier
has indicated in writing or otherwise any material modification or
change in the business relationship with the Company, including but not
limited to, a reduction in the volume of business transacted by such
Major Customer or Major Supplier, as the case may be, below historical
levels.
(ii) Since January 1, 2002: (1) no supplier or customer of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries has canceled or otherwise terminated
its relationship with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, except for
such cancellations and terminations that, individually or in the
aggregate, have not had, or more likely than not are not expected to
have, a Material Adverse Effect; (2) to the Knowledge of the Company, no
supplier or customer of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has
provided written notice to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of its
intent either to terminate its relationship with the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries or to cancel any material agreement with the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries, except for such terminations and cancellations
that would not, individually or in the aggregate, have, or will have, a
Material Adverse Effect; (3) to the Knowledge of the Company, none of
the suppliers of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is unable to
continue to supply the products or services supplied to the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries by such supplier, except for such inabilities
that, individually or in the aggregate, have not had, or will have, a
Material Adverse Effect; and (4) the Company and its Subsidiaries have
no direct or indirect ownership interest in any supplier or customer of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that is material to the Company
and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole.
(r) Certain Business Practices. To the Knowledge of the Company,
within the past five years, none of the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or
any directors, officers, agents or employees of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries has, directly or indirectly, (i) used any funds for unlawful
contributions, gifts, kickbacks entertainment or other unlawful expenses
related to political activity, (ii) made any unlawful payment to foreign or
domestic government officials or employees or to foreign or domestic
political parties or campaigns or violated any provision of the Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, (iii) made any unlawful
contribution, gift, bribe, rebate, payoff, influence payment, kickback, or
other unlawful payment to any Person, private or public, regardless of
form, whether in money, property, or services (1) to obtain favorable
treatment in securing business, (2) to pay for favorable treatment for
business secured, (3) to obtain special concessions or for special
concessions already obtained, for or in respect of the Company, or (4) in
violation of any Legal Requirement, (iv) established or maintained any fund
or asset that has not been recorded in the books and records of the
Company, or (v) made any other unlawful payment.
(s) Real Estate.
(i) Section 3.1(s) of the Company Disclosure Schedule contains a
true correct and complete description of all owned and leased real
estate and all leases, subleases, licenses and other occupancy
agreements together with any amendments thereto, any option agreements
and any subordination, nondisturbance and attornment agreements (the
"Leases"), with respect to all real property leased or subleased by the
Company or its Subsidiaries (the "Leased Real Estate" and, together with
the owned real estate, the "Real Property"). Each Lease is in full force
and effect, the Company and/or the Subsidiaries, as applicable and any
other party thereto has performed all material obligations required to
be performed by it to date under each of the Leases and neither the
Company, the Subsidiary nor, to the Company's or Subsidiary's Knowledge,
any other party thereto is in material default under any of the Leases
(and no event has occurred which, with due notice or lapse of time or
both, would constitute such a lapse or default). No amount due under the
Leases remains unpaid, no material controversy, claim, dispute or
disagreement exists between the parties to any of the Leases. The
Company has delivered to Parent true correct and complete copies of each
Lease, and all amendments thereto, listed on Section 3.1(s) of the
Company Disclosure Schedule, except to the extent otherwise noted
therein.
(ii) The covenants, conditions, restrictions, encroachments,
encumbrances, easements, rights of way, licenses, grants, building or
use restrictions, exceptions, reservations, limitations or other
impediments affecting the Real Property do not and will not, with
respect to each Real Property,
14
materially impair the Company's ability to use any such Real Property in
the operation of the Company's business as presently conducted. There
are no pending or, to the Company's Knowledge, threatened condemnation
or similar proceedings affecting the Real Property
(iii) All brokerage commissions and other compensation and fees
payable by reason of the Leases have been paid in full except for such
commissions and other compensation related to options or extensions in
the Leases which are not yet exercised.
(iv) To the Company's Knowledge, all improvements on the Real
Property and the operations therein conducted conform in all material
respects to all applicable Legal Requirements, including without
limitation, health, fire, environmental, safety, zoning and building
laws, ordinances and administrative regulations, except for possible
nonconforming uses or violations which do not and will not expose any
person or property to injury or damage, materially and adversely affect
any insurance coverage, give rise to strict liability, penalties or
fines jeopardize any Permit or materially interfere with the present
use, operation or maintenance thereof by the Company and its
Subsidiaries as now used, operated or maintained, and which do not and
will not materially and adversely affect the value thereof. To the
Company's Knowledge, all buildings, structures, improvements and
fixtures owned, leased or used by the Company or its Subsidiaries in the
conduct of its business at the Real Property conform in all material
respects to all applicable codes and rules adopted by national and local
associations and boards of insurance underwriters; and all such
buildings, structures, improvements and fixtures are in good operating
condition and repair, free of leaks and other material defects and have
not suffered any casualty or other material damage that has not been
repaired in all material respects except to the extent that the same
does not materially affect the Company's use and enjoyment of the Real
Property.
(v) There are no outstanding requirements or recommendations by any
insurance company which has issued to the Company a policy covering the
Real Property, or by any board of fire underwriters or other body
exercising similar functions, requiring or recommending any repairs or
work to be done on such property.
(vi) Except as set forth in Section 3.1(s) of the Company
Disclosure Schedule, the Company has not assigned any of its interests
under any Lease, nor is any Real Property subject to any lease,
sublease, license or other agreement granting to any other Person any
right to the use, occupancy or enjoyment of such property or any portion
thereof. No option (to extend or reduce the term of any Lease, or reduce
or expand the space conveyed under any sublease or to purchase the
property leased under any such lease) has been exercised or has expired
under any of the Leases, except options whose exercise or expiration
have been evidenced by a written document, a true, complete and accurate
copy of which has been delivered to the Parent with the corresponding
Lease.
(vii) The Real Property is all of the real property used by the
Company or necessary for the conduct of its business as currently
conducted.
(t) Voting Requirements. The affirmative vote of the holders of
two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock at the Company
Shareholders Meeting to adopt this Agreement (the "Company Shareholder
Approval") is the only vote of the holders of any class or series of the
Company's capital stock necessary to adopt and approve this Agreement and
the Merger and the transactions contemplated hereby.
(u) Condition and Compliance of Property; Accounts.
(i) The assets of the Company: (1) in the aggregate are adequate to
conduct the operations of the Company in substantially the manner
currently conducted, (2) are suitable for the purposes for which they
are currently used, (3) have been maintained in accordance with the
Company's historical practices since December 31, 2001, and (4) are in
good condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted.
(ii) Section 3.1(u) of the Company Disclosure Schedule correctly
identifies each bank account, brokerage account and safety deposit box
maintained by or on behalf or for the benefit of the Company.
(v) Company Rights Agreement. The Rights Agreement dated as of
October 23, 1993 between the Company and National City Bank, Cleveland,
Ohio (the "Company Rights Agreement") has been amended to (i) render the
Company Rights Agreement inapplicable to the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (ii) ensure that (x) none of
Acquiror or its wholly owned Subsidiaries is an Acquiring Person (as
defined in the Company Rights Agreement) pursuant to the Company Rights
15
Agreement, (y) a Distribution Date, a Triggering Event or a Share
Acquisition Date (as such terms are defined in the Company Rights
Agreement) does not occur solely by reason of the execution of this
Agreement, the consummation of the Merger, or the consummation of the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and (z) ensure that the Company
Rights Agreement will expire or otherwise terminate immediately prior to
the Effective Time.
(w) Board Recommendation. As of the date hereof, the Board of
Directors of the Company has recommended that the shareholders of the
Company vote for adoption of this Agreement.
(x) Contracts. Except as disclosed in the Company SEC Documents,
neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is a party to or bound by (i) any
"material contract" (as such term is defined in Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K of the SEC) or any agreement, contract or commitment that
would be such a "material contract" but for the exception for contracts
entered into in the ordinary course of business, (ii) any non-competition
agreement or any other agreement or obligation which materially limits or
will materially limit the Company from engaging in any line of business,
(iii) any Lease, or (iv) any material agreement, contract or commitment to
which the Company is a party that is not in the Ordinary Course of Business
(collectively, "the Contracts"). With such exceptions as, individually or
in the aggregate, have not had, and would not be reasonably expected to
have, a Material Adverse Effect, (x) each of the contracts, agreements and
commitments of the Company is valid and in full force and effect and (y)
neither the Company nor a Subsidiary has violated any provision of, or
committed or failed to perform any act which, with or without notice, lapse
of time, or both, would constitute a default under the provisions of any
such contract, agreement or commitment. To the Knowledge of the Company, no
counterparty to any such contract, agreement or commitment has violated any
provision of, or committed or failed to perform any act which, with or
without notice, lapse of time, or both would constitute a default or other
breach under the provisions of, such contract, agreement or commitment,
except for defaults or breaches which, individually or in the aggregate,
have not had, or would not reasonably be expected to have, a Material
Adverse Effect. Neither Company nor any Subsidiary is a party to, or
otherwise a guarantor of or liable with respect to, any interest rate,
currency or other swap or derivative transaction. The Company has provided
or made available to Parent a copy of each agreement described in item (i),
(ii), (iii) or (iv) above.
(y) Insurance. SECTION 3.1(Y) of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets
forth a list of all insurance policies and all material fidelity bonds or
other insurance service contracts (the "Insurance Policies") providing
coverage for the properties or operations of the Company, the type and
amount of coverage, and the expiration dates of the Insurance Policies.
There is no claim by the Company pending under any of the Insurance
Policies as to which coverage has been questioned, denied or disputed by
the underwriters of such policies. All premiums payable under all Insurance
Policies have been paid, and the Company has otherwise complied in all
material respects with the terms and conditions of all the Insurance
Policies. The Insurance Policies are valid and enforceable in accordance
with their terms, are issued by an insurer that is financially sound and
reputable, are in full force and effect and insure against risk and
liabilities customary in the industry and as required by Legal Requirements
and the Contracts. The Company has not received notice from any insurance
carrier: (i) threatening a suspension, revocation, modification or
cancellation of any Insurance Policy or a material increase in any premium
in connection therewith, or (ii) informing Company that any coverage listed
on SECTION 3.1(W) of the Company Disclosure Schedule will or may not be
available in the future on substantially the same terms as now in effect.
(z) Product Liability; Warranty. Except as disclosed in SECTION
3.1(Z) of the Company Disclosure Schedule:
(i) there has not been during the past six (6) years from the date
of this Agreement and there is no notice, demand, claim, action, suit,
inquiry, hearing, proceeding, notice of violation or investigation of a
civil, criminal or administrative nature by any Governmental Entity
against or involving any product, substance or material (collectively, a
"Product"), or class of claims or lawsuits involving a Product
manufactured, produced, distributed or sold by or on behalf of the
Company which is pending or, to Company's Knowledge, threatened,
resulting from an alleged defect in design, manufacture, materials or
workmanship of any Product manufactured, produced, distributed or sold
by or on behalf of the Company, or any alleged failure to warn, or from
any breach of express or implied specifications or warranties or
representations (a "Product Claim");
16
(ii) there has not been, nor is there under consideration or
investigation by the Company, any Product recall, rework, retrofit or
post-sale warning (collectively, recalls, reworks, retrofits and
post-sale warnings are referred to in this Agreement as "Recalls")
conducted by or on behalf of the Company concerning any Products
manufactured, produced, distributed or sold by or on behalf of the
Company or, to the Company's Knowledge, any Recall conducted by or on
behalf of any entity as a result of any alleged defect in any Product
supplied by the Company, other than rework, refurbishments, or refits
arising in the Ordinary Course of Business; and
(iii) there is no Product Claim pending or, to the Company's
Knowledge threatened, on behalf of a customer of the Company or a
consumer that, individually or in the aggregate, has had or could
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
(aa) No Additional Representations or Warranties. Neither the Company
nor any other Person makes any other express or implied representation on
behalf of the Company other than as expressly set forth in this ARTICLE
III.
SECTION 3.2 Representations and Warranties of Acquiror, Parent and Merger
Sub. Acquiror, Parent and Merger Sub each hereby represents and warrants to the
Company as follows:
(a) No Prior Activities of Merger Sub. Merger Sub has not conducted
any business prior to the date hereof and has no, and prior to the
Effective Time will have no, assets, liabilities or obligations of any
nature other than those incident to its formation and pursuant to this
Agreement and the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
(b) Organization, Standing and Corporate Power. Each of Acquiror,
Parent and Merger Sub is a corporation or other legal entity duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the
jurisdiction in which it is organized and has the requisite corporate or
other power, as the case may be, and authority to carry on its business as
now being conducted.
(c) Authority; No Conflict. Each of Acquiror, Parent, and Merger Sub
has all requisite corporate power and authority to enter into this
Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, subject to approval by shareholders of Parent ("Parent
Shareholder Approval"). The execution and delivery of this Agreement by
Acquiror, Parent, and Merger Sub and the consummation by Acquiror, Parent,
and Merger Sub of the transactions contemplated hereby have been duly
authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of Acquiror,
Parent, and Merger Sub, subject to Parent Shareholder Approval. This
Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by Acquiror, Parent, and
Merger Sub and, assuming the due authorization, execution and delivery by
the Company, constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of Acquiror,
Parent, and Merger Sub, enforceable against Acquiror, Parent and Merger Sub
in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent
transfer, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws of general
applicability relating to or affecting the rights of creditors and to
general principles of equity. Except as set forth in SECTION 3.2(C) to the
Acquiror disclosure schedule attached hereto (the "Acquiror Disclosure
Schedule"), the execution and delivery of this Agreement does not, and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and
compliance with the provisions of this Agreement will not, conflict with,
or result in any violation of, or default (with or without notice or lapse
of time, or both) under, or give rise to a right of termination,
cancellation or acceleration of any obligation or loss of a benefit under,
(i) the certificate incorporation, articles of organization or other
charter documents of Acquiror or Parent or the articles of incorporation or
code of regulation of Merger Sub, (ii) any loan or credit agreement, note,
bond, mortgage, indenture, lease or other agreement, instrument, permit,
concession, franchise, license or similar authorization applicable to
Acquiror or Parent or their respective properties or assets or (iii)
subject to the governmental filings and other matters referred to in the
following sentence, any judgment, order, decree, statute, law, ordinance,
rule or regulation applicable to Acquiror or Parent or their respective
properties or assets, other than, in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii),
any such conflicts, violations, defaults, rights, losses or Liens that
individually or in the aggregate would not reasonably be expected to
materially impair or delay the ability of Acquiror, Parent, or Merger Sub
to perform their obligations under this Agreement. No consent, approval,
order or authorization of, action by, or in respect of, or registration,
declaration or filing with, any Governmental Entity is required by
Acquiror, Parent or Merger Sub in connection with the execution and
delivery of this Agreement by Acquiror or the consummation by Acquiror of
the transactions contemplated hereby, except: (1) the filing of the
Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Ohio; (2)
the filing of a pre-merger notification and report form by Acquiror and
17
Parent under the HSR Act; (3) such filings, consents, approvals, orders or
authorizations as may be required to be made or obtained pursuant to
Foreign Antitrust Laws; (4) such filings, consents, approvals, orders or
authorizations as may be required to be made or obtained pursuant to rules
and regulations of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong; and, (5) such consents,
approvals, orders or authorizations the failure of which to be made or
obtained individually or in the aggregate would not reasonably be expected
to materially impair or delay the ability of Acquiror, Parent or Merger Sub
to perform its respective obligations under this Agreement.
(d) Proxy Materials. All of the information to be furnished by
Acquiror, Parent or Merger Sub for inclusion in the Definitive Proxy
Statement (or any amendment or supplement thereto) will not, on the date it
is first mailed to the Company's shareholders, and the Definitive Proxy
Statement, as then amended or supplemented, on the date of the Company
Shareholders Meeting referred to in SECTION 5.1(A) (Proxy Statement) or on
the Closing Date, contain any statement which is false or misleading with
respect to any material fact or omit to state any material fact required to
be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Acquiror, Parent and Merger Sub make no
representation or warranty regarding information furnished by the Company
for inclusion in the Definitive Proxy Statement (or any amendment or
supplement thereto). The information supplied or to be supplied in writing
by or on behalf of Acquiror or Merger Sub for inclusion in the Definitive
Proxy Statement will comply as to form and substance in all material
respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the applicable rules
and regulations of the SEC thereunder.
(e) Brokers. Except as set forth in SECTION 3.2(E) of the Acquiror
Disclosure Statement, no broker, investment banker, financial advisor or
other Person is entitled to any broker's, finder's, financial advisor's or
other similar fee or commission in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement based upon arrangements made by or on behalf
of Acquiror or Merger Sub.
ARTICLE IV
PRE-CLOSING COVENANTS
SECTION 4.1 Conduct of Business. Except as (i) set forth in SECTION 4.1
of the Company Disclosure Schedule, (ii) as otherwise expressly contemplated by
this Agreement or (iii) consented to by Acquiror, such consent not to be
unreasonably withheld or delayed, during the period from the date of this
Agreement to the Effective Time, the Company shall, and shall cause its
Subsidiaries to, carry on their respective businesses in the Ordinary Course of
Business consistent with past practice and in compliance in all material
respects with all applicable Legal Requirements and, to the extent consistent
therewith, use all reasonable efforts to preserve intact their current business
organizations (other than internal organizational realignments), use all
reasonable efforts to keep available the services of their current officers and
other key employees and preserve their relationships with those Persons having
business dealings with them to the end that their goodwill and ongoing
businesses shall be unimpaired at the Effective Time. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing and except as subject to the above exceptions,
during the period from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time or
earlier termination of this Agreement, the Company shall not, and shall not
permit any of its Subsidiaries to:
(a) (x) declare, set aside or pay any dividends on, or make any other
distributions in respect of, any of its capital stock other than dividends
and distributions by a direct or indirect wholly owned Subsidiary of the
Company to its parent, (y) split, combine or reclassify any of its capital
stock or issue or authorize the issuance of any other securities in respect
of, in lieu of or in substitution for shares of its capital stock, except
for issuances of the Company Common Stock upon the exercise of the Company
Stock Options under the Company Stock Plans or in connection with other
awards under the Company Stock Plans, in each case, outstanding as of the
Stock Reference Date, and in accordance with their present terms or issued
pursuant to SECTION 4.1(B) or (z) except pursuant to agreements entered
into with respect to the Company Stock Plans that are in effect as of the
close of business on the Stock Reference Date or issued pursuant to SECTION
4.1(B), purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of capital stock
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any other securities thereof
or any rights, warrants or options to acquire any such shares or other
securities;
18
(b) issue, deliver, sell, pledge or otherwise encumber or subject to
any Lien any shares of its capital stock, any other voting securities or
any securities convertible into, or any rights, warrants or options to
acquire, any such shares, voting securities or convertible securities,
other than the issuance of Company Common Stock upon the exercise of the
Company Stock Options or in connection with other awards under the Company
Stock Plans (x) outstanding as the Stock Reference Date and in accordance
with their present terms or granted after the date thereof in the Ordinary
Course of Business consistent with past practice or (y) after consulting
with Acquiror, otherwise granted after the date hereof;
(c) amend its articles of incorporation, code of regulations or other
comparable organizational documents, or, in the case of the Company, merge
or consolidate with any Person;
(d) acquire or agree to acquire, or dispose of or agree to dispose of,
any material assets, either by purchase, merger, consolidation, sale of
shares in any of its Subsidiaries or otherwise, except for (w) purchases of
capital equipment in accordance with the previously approved capital
expenditure budget, a complete and correct copy of which has been furnished
to Acquiror, (x) purchase of inventory components and subsequent sale of
inventory in the Ordinary Course of Business, consistent with past
practice, (y) sale of obsolete equipment for fair market value, and (z) the
sale of excess equipment in an amount in any single transaction or series
of related transactions, not to exceed $3 million;
(e) sell, lease, license, mortgage or otherwise encumber or subject to
any Lien, abandon or otherwise dispose of any of its properties or assets
other than in the Ordinary Course of Business consistent with past
practice;
(f) take any action that would cause the representations and
warranties set forth in this Agreement to no longer be true and correct;
(g) amend, modify or waive any provision of the Company Rights
Agreement, and shall not take any action to redeem the rights issued
thereunder or render the rights issued thereunder inapplicable to a
transaction, other than to permit another transaction that the Board of
Directors of the Company has determined in good faith, after consultation
with outside counsel, is a Superior Proposal;
(h) make any change in accounting methods or cash management;
(i) (i) grant any increase in the compensation payable or to become
payable by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to any of its officers,
directors or key employees, except in the case of key employees (who are
not officers or directors) increases in the Ordinary Course of Business, or
pursuant to Contracts in effect as of the date of this Agreement; or (ii)
(A) adopt any new, (B) grant any award under, or (C) except as required by
applicable Legal Requirements, amend or otherwise increase, or accelerate
the payment or vesting of the amounts payable or to become payable under,
any existing Company Benefit Plan; or (iii) enter into or modify or amend
any employment or severance agreement with or, except as required by
applicable Legal Requirements, grant any severance or termination rights to
any officer, director or employee of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries; (iv) enter into any collective bargaining agreement or (v)
make any loan to, or enter into any material transaction of any other
nature with, any director, executive officer or key employee of the
Company;
(j) modify, amend or terminate in any material respect, any of its
material Contracts or waive, release or assign any material rights or
claims;
(k) (i) incur or assume any Indebtedness other than Indebtedness with
respect to working capital in amounts consistent with past practice; (ii)
materially modify any Indebtedness or other Liability; (iii) assume,
guarantee, endorse or otherwise become liable or responsible (whether
directly, contingently or otherwise) for the obligations of any other
Person (other than a Subsidiary), other than immaterial amounts in the
Ordinary Course of Business, and other than the endorsement of negotiable
instruments for collection in the Ordinary Course of Business; (iv) make
any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any
other person (other than to wholly owned Subsidiaries of the Company or
customary advances to employees in accordance with past practice); or (v)
enter into any material commitment or transaction;
(l) make any material tax election (unless required by law) or settle
or compromise any material income tax liability;
19
(m) (i) waive the benefits of, or agree to modify in any material
manner, any confidentiality, standstill or similar agreement to which the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party, or (ii) pay, discharge or
satisfy any proceeding, other than a payment, discharge or satisfaction (A)
involving payments by the Company or its Subsidiaries of less than $1
million, or (B) for which liabilities are reflected on or are reserved
against in the Company's most recent consolidated financial statements (or
the notes thereto) included in the Company SEC Reports, but not to exceed
the reserve therefor, in each case in complete satisfaction, and with a
complete release, of such matter with respect to all parties to such
matter, of actions, suits, proceedings or claims;
(n) make any payment or incur any liability or obligation for the
purpose of obtaining any consent from any third party to the transactions
contemplated hereby;
(o) fail to keep in full force and effect insurance comparable in
amount and scope to coverage maintained by it (or on behalf of it) on the
date hereof;
(p) accelerate the collection of receivables or defer the payment of
payables or modify the payment terms of any receivables or payables, other
than immaterial changes in a manner consistent with past practice, or sell,
securitize, factor or otherwise transfer any accounts receivable other than
consistent with past practice;
(q) permit any purchase of Common Stock by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries at a price higher than the Merger Consideration;
(r) fail to inform Parent of the occurrence of any event which to the
Knowledge of the Company could reasonably be expected to result in a breach
of any representation or warranty contained in Section 3.1; and
(s) shall enter into an agreement, contract, commitment or arrangement
to do any of the foregoing, or to authorize, recommend, propose or announce
an intention to do any of the foregoing;
provided that the limitations set forth in this SECTION 4.1 (other than clause
(c)) shall not apply to any transaction to which the only parties are the
Company and any wholly owned Subsidiary or Subsidiaries of the Company.
SECTION 4.2 Other Actions. Except as required by law, the Company, Parent
and Acquiror shall not, and neither shall permit any of their respective
Subsidiaries to, voluntarily take any action that would reasonably be expected
to result in any of the conditions to the Merger set forth in ARTICLE VI
(Conditions Precedent) not being satisfied.
SECTION 4.3 Advice of Changes. The Company and Acquiror shall give prompt
oral and written notice to the other party of (i) the occurrence, or
non-occurrence of any event whose occurrence, or non-occurrence would be likely
to cause either (A) a Material Adverse Change, (B) any representation or
warranty contained in this Agreement to be untrue or inaccurate in any respect
at any time from the date hereof to the Effective Time or (C) any failure of the
Company, Acquiror or Parent, or any of their respective officers, directors,
employees, agents or subsidiaries, to comply with or satisfy any covenant,
condition or agreement to be complied with or satisfied by it hereunder;
provided, however, that the delivery of any notice pursuant to this SECTION 4.3
shall not limit or otherwise affect the representations, warranties or remedies
available hereunder to any party hereto.
SECTION 4.4 No Solicitation by the Company.
(a) The Company shall not, nor shall it permit any of its Subsidiaries to,
nor shall it authorize or permit any of its directors, officers or employees or
any investment banker, financial advisor, attorney, accountant or other
representative retained by it or any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or
indirectly, through another Person, (i) solicit, initiate or encourage
(including by way of furnishing information), or take any other action designed
to facilitate, any inquiries or the making of any proposal which constitutes any
Company Takeover Proposal or (ii) participate in any discussions or negotiations
regarding any Company Takeover Proposal; provided, however, that if, at any
time, the Board of Directors of the Company determines in good faith, after
consultation with such legal, financial and other advisors as it deems
appropriate, that it is necessary to do so in order to act in a manner
consistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law, the Company may,
prior to the date of the Shareholders Meeting and in response to a Superior
Proposal that was not solicited by it or that did not otherwise result from a
breach of this SECTION 4.4(A), (x) furnish non-public information with respect
to the Company and its Subsidiaries to any Person making or proposing to make a
Superior Proposal pursuant to a confidentiality agreement and (y) participate in
discussions or negotiations regarding such Superior Proposal.
20
(b) In addition to the obligations of the Company set forth in paragraph
(a) of this SECTION 4.4, the Company shall immediately advise Acquiror orally
and in writing of any request for information or of any Company Takeover
Proposal and the material terms and conditions of such request or Company
Takeover Proposal. The Company will keep Acquiror reasonably informed of the
status and details (including amendments and proposed amendments) of any such
request or Company Takeover Proposal.
(c) Nothing contained in this SECTION 4.4 shall prohibit the Company from
taking and disclosing to its shareholders a position contemplated by Rule
14e-2(a) promulgated under the Exchange Act or from making any disclosure to the
Company's shareholders if, in the good faith judgment of the Board of Directors
of the Company, after consultation with outside counsel, failure so to disclose
would be inconsistent with its obligations under applicable law.
(d) Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this SECTION 4.4, the
Company (i) may file this Agreement and any press release announcing this
Agreement as exhibits to a Current Report on Form 8-K, and (ii) may, in private
communications with third parties and in other public disclosures, make a
statement to the effect that, consistent with its fiduciary obligations and
subject to the terms of this Agreement, the Board of Directors of the Company
has preserved its ability to respond to third parties, where appropriate.
SECTION 4.5 Continued Availability of Funds; Evidence of Funds.
(a) The Parent, directly or indirectly through the Acquiror or Merger Sub,
shall at all times prior to the Closing Date, maintain on hand sufficient funds
to pay the Merger Consideration (the "Financing").
(b) The Parent shall provide to the Company upon execution of this
Agreement and thereafter, as the Company may reasonably request, continuing
financial and accounting evidence of their financial capacity to make the
investments contemplated by this Agreement.
ARTICLE V
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
SECTION 5.1 Preparation of the Proxy Statement; Shareholders Meeting.
(a) Proxy Statement. In connection with the Company Shareholders Meeting
contemplated by SECTION 5.1(B) below, the Company will prepare and file (after
consultations with Acquiror) a preliminary proxy statement relating to the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement (the "Preliminary Proxy Statement")
and will use its commercially reasonable efforts to respond to the comments of
the SEC thereon, and to cause a final proxy statement (such proxy statement the
"Definitive Proxy Statement") to be mailed to the Company's shareholders, in
each case as soon as reasonably practicable after providing Acquiror with
reasonable opportunity to comment thereon. Each party to this Agreement will
notify the other parties promptly of the receipt of the comments of the SEC, if
any, and of any request by the SEC for amendments or supplements to the
Preliminary Proxy Statement or the Definitive Proxy Statement or for additional
information, and will supply the others with copies of all correspondence
between such party or its representatives, on the one hand, and the SEC or
members of its staff, on the other hand, with respect to the Preliminary Proxy
Statement, the Definitive Proxy Statement or the Merger. If at any time prior to
the Company Shareholders Meeting, (i) any event should occur relating to the
Company or any of the Subsidiaries which should be set forth in an amendment of,
or a supplement to, the Definitive Proxy Statement, or (ii) any event should
occur relating to Acquiror, Parent, or Merger Sub or any of their respective
Affiliates, or relating to the plans of any such Persons for the Surviving
Corporation after the Effective Time of the Merger, or relating to the Financing
of the transaction, in either case that should be set forth in an amendment of,
or a supplement to, the Definitive Proxy Statement, then the Company or Acquiror
(as applicable), will, upon learning of such event, promptly inform the other of
such event and the Company shall prepare, file and, if required, mail such
amendment or supplement to the Company's shareholders; provided that, prior to
such filing or mailing the Company shall consult with Acquiror with respect to
such amendment or supplement and shall afford Acquiror reasonable opportunity to
comment thereon. Acquiror will furnish to the Company the information relating
to Acquiror, Parent, and Merger Sub, their respective Affiliates and the plans
of such Persons for the Surviving Corporation after the Effective Time of the
Merger, and relating to the Financing, which is required to be set forth in the
Preliminary Proxy Statement or the Definitive Proxy Statement under the Exchange
Act and the rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder.
21
(b) The Company will take all action necessary in accordance with
applicable law and its governing documents to duly call, give notice of, and,
after SEC clearance of the Definitive Proxy Statement, convene a meeting of its
shareholders (the "Company Shareholders Meeting") to consider and vote upon the
adoption of this Agreement. The Board of Directors of the Company shall
recommend such adoption and approval, and subject to fiduciary obligations under
applicable law, shall not withdraw or modify such recommendation other than in
compliance with SECTION 4.4(A) and SECTION 7.1(E), or if the Fairness Opinion is
withdrawn by Financial Advisor and the Company terminates this Agreement under
SECTION 7.1(F), and shall take all lawful action necessary to obtain such
shareholder approval.
(c) Parent will take all action necessary in accordance with applicable
law, including the rules and regulations of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong, to
obtain approval of the Merger by the shareholders of Parent. The disclosure
statement or other communication sent by Parent to its shareholders shall
contain (i) the recommendation of the Board of Directors of Parent that such
shareholders vote in favor of the Merger and (ii) a statement that the executive
members of the Board of Directors of Parent intend to vote their shares of
Parent Common Stock in favor of the Merger.
SECTION 5.2 Access to Information; Confidentiality. To the extent
permitted by applicable law and subject to the Agreement dated October 2, 2002
between Acquiror and the Company (the "Confidentiality Agreement"), the Company
shall, and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to afford to Acquiror and to the
officers, employees, accountants, counsel, financial advisors and other
representatives of Acquiror, reasonable access during normal business hours
during the period prior to the Effective Time to all their respective properties
(including access to perform environmental studies, if deemed necessary or
appropriate by the Acquiror), books, contracts, commitments, personnel and
records and, during such period, the Company shall, and shall cause each of its
subsidiaries to furnish promptly to Acquiror (a) a copy of each report,
schedule, registration statement and other document filed by it during such
period pursuant to the requirements of federal or state securities laws and (b)
all other information concerning its business, properties and Personnel as such
other party may reasonably request. Any review pursuant to this SECTION 5.2
shall be for the purposes of confirming the accuracy of any representation or
warranty contained in this Agreement given by the Company to Acquiror, Parent
and Merger Sub. The Acquiror will hold, and will cause its respective officers,
employees, accountants, counsel, financial advisors and other representatives
and affiliates, any non-public information in accordance with the terms of the
Confidentiality Agreement.
SECTION 5.3 Commercially Reasonable Efforts; Cooperation.
(a) Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
Agreement, each of the parties agrees to use commercially reasonable efforts to
take, or cause to be taken, all actions, and to do, or cause to be done, and to
assist and cooperate with the other parties in doing, all things necessary,
proper or advisable to consummate and make effective, in the most expeditious
manner practicable, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, including (i) obtaining of all necessary actions or non-actions,
waivers, consents and approvals from Governmental Entities and the making of all
necessary registrations and filings and the taking of all steps as may be
necessary to obtain an approval or waiver from, or to avoid an action or
proceeding by, any Governmental Entity, (ii) obtaining of all necessary
consents, approvals or waivers from third parties, (iii) defending any lawsuits
or other legal proceedings, whether judicial or administrative, challenging this
Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including
seeking to have any stay or temporary restraining order entered by any court or
other Governmental Entity vacated or reversed, and (iv) executing and delivering
of any additional instruments necessary to consummate the transactions
contemplated by, and to fully carry out the purposes of, this Agreement. Nothing
set forth in this SECTION 5.3(A) will limit or affect actions permitted to be
taken pursuant to SECTION 4.2.
(b) Each of Acquiror and the Company shall use their best efforts to file
as soon as practicable notifications under the HSR Act with respect to the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement and to respond
at the earliest practicable date with any request under the HSR Act for
additional information, documents or other materials received by such party from
the Federal Trade Commission or the Department of Justice or any other
Governmental Entity in respect of such filings or the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The parties to this Agreement will
cooperate with the other party in connection with making any filing under the
HSR Act and in connection with any filings, conferences or other submissions
related to resolving any investigation or other inquiry by any Governmental
Authority with respect to the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by
this Agreement.
22
SECTION 5.4 Director, Officer and Employee Indemnification.
(a) Acquiror shall, and shall cause the Surviving Corporation to, and the
Surviving Corporation shall, indemnify and hold harmless, to the fullest extent
permitted under applicable law, the individuals who on or prior to the Effective
Time were officers, directors or employees of the Company or its Subsidiaries
(collectively, the "Indemnitees") with respect to all acts or omissions by them
in their capacities as such or taken at the request of the Company or its
Subsidiaries at any time prior to the Effective Time. With respect to all acts
or omissions by them in their capacities as such or taken at the request of the
Company or its Subsidiaries at any time prior to the Effective Time. Acquiror
agrees that, and Acquiror agrees to cause the Surviving Corporation to agree
that, all rights of the Indemnitees to indemnification and exculpation from
liabilities for acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the Effective Time as
provided in the respective articles of incorporation or regulations (or
comparable organizational and governing documents) of the Company and its
Subsidiaries as now in effect and any indemnification agreements or arrangements
of the Company or its Subsidiaries shall survive the Merger and shall continue
in full force and effect in accordance with their terms. Such rights shall not
be amended, or otherwise modified in any manner that would adversely affect the
rights of the Indemnitees, unless such modification is required by law. In
addition, the Surviving Corporation shall pay any expenses of any Indemnitee
under this SECTION 5.4 as incurred to the fullest extent permitted under
applicable law, provided that the Person to whom expenses are advanced provides
an undertaking to repay such advances to the extent required by applicable law.
(b) In the event any action is asserted or made, any determination required
to be made with respect to whether an Indemnitee's conduct complies with the
standards set forth under the Ohio Statutes, the applicable organizational
documents of the Company or its Subsidiaries or any indemnification agreements
or arrangements of the Company or its Subsidiaries, as the case may be, shall be
made by independent legal counsel selected by the Acquiror and reasonably
acceptable to the Indemnitee; provided, however, that nothing in this SECTION
5.4 shall impair any rights of any current or former director or officer of the
Company or its Subsidiaries, including pursuant to the respective articles of
incorporation or bylaws of Surviving Corporation or the Company, or their
respective subsidiaries, under Ohio law or otherwise.
(c) Each of Acquiror, the Surviving Corporation and the Indemnitee shall
cooperate, and cause their respective affiliates to cooperate, in the defense of
any action and shall provide access to properties and individuals as reasonably
requested and furnish or cause to be furnished records, information and
testimony, and attend such conferences, discovery proceedings, hearings, trials
or appeals, as may be reasonably requested in connection therewith.
(d) For the six-year period commencing immediately after the Effective
Time, Surviving Corporation shall either (i) maintain in effect the Company's
current directors' and officers' liability insurance policies providing coverage
as respects acts or omissions occurring prior to the Effective Time with respect
to those persons who are currently covered by the Company's directors' and
officers' liability insurance policy ("D&O Insurance") on terms and at limits no
less favorable to the Company's directors and officers currently covered by
policies in effect on the date hereof or (ii) a directors' and officers'
insurance policy for the exclusive benefit of those persons who are currently
covered by the Company's directors' and officers' liability insurance policy
from a financially sound and nationally reputable carrier which (1) is at least
as favorable to the Persons currently covered by the Company's directors' and
officers' liability insurance in effect as of the date hereof and (2) will at a
minimum have the same terms and limits as the Company's directors' and officers'
liability insurance policies in effect as of the date hereof; provided, however,
that, if the Company's current directors' and officers' liability insurance
expires, is terminated or is canceled during such six-year period, Acquiror
shall, or shall cause the Surviving Corporation to, obtain directors' and
officers' liability insurance covering such acts or omissions with respect to
each such Person on terms and at limits no less favorable to the Company's
directors and officers currently covered by policies in effect immediately prior
to the date of such expiration, termination or cancellation, provided, however,
that the Surviving Corporation shall not be required to pay an annual premium
for the D&O Insurance in excess of 200% of the estimated premium for 2003. The
Company and Acquiror shall cooperate to make any arrangements necessary to
obtain or continue such directors' and officers' liability insurance for such
six-year period, including the prepayment any fees or premiums to the applicable
insurance providers of such amounts as necessary to provide the coverage
contemplated by this SECTION 5.4.
23
(e) The provisions of this SECTION 5.4 are intended to be for the benefit
of, and shall be enforceable by, each Indemnitee, such Indemnitee's heirs and
representatives and (ii) are in addition to, and not in substitution for, any
other rights to indemnification or contribution that any such Person may have by
contract or otherwise.
(f) In the event that the Surviving Corporation or any of its successors or
assigns (i) consolidates with or merges into any other Person and is not the
continuing or surviving corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger or
(ii) transfers or conveys all or substantially all of its properties and assets
to any Person, then, and in each such case, proper provision shall be made so
that the successors and assigns of the Surviving Corporation shall assume all of
the obligations thereof set forth in this SECTION 5.4.
(g) The obligations of Acquiror and the Surviving Corporation under this
SECTION 5.4 shall not be terminated or modified in such a manner as to adversely
affect any Indemnitee to whom this SECTION 5.4 applies without the consent of
the affected Indemnitee (it being expressly agreed that the Indemnitees to whom
this SECTION 5.4 applies shall be third party beneficiaries of this SECTION
5.4).
SECTION 5.5 Public Announcements. Acquiror and the Company will consult
with each other before issuing, and provide each other the opportunity to
review, comment upon and concur with, any press release or other public
statements with respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
including the Merger, and, subject to SECTION 4.4(D), shall not issue any such
press release or make any such public statement prior to such consultation,
except as either party may determine is required by applicable law, court
process or by obligations pursuant to any listing rules or listing agreement
with any national securities or stock exchange. The parties agree that the
initial press release to be issued with respect to the transactions contemplated
by this Agreement shall be in the form heretofore agreed to by the parties.
SECTION 5.6 2002 Year-End Benefits. The Surviving Corporation agrees to
make, if not previously paid prior to the Effective Time, payments under the
Company's current incentive bonus and profit sharing plans with respect to the
year ended December 31, 2002.
SECTION 5.7 Delisting. Each of the parties hereto shall cooperate with
each other in taking, or causing to be taken, all actions necessary to delist
all of the Company Common Stock from the New York Stock Exchange and to
terminate registration under the Exchange Act; provided, that such delisting and
termination shall not be effective until after the Effective Time.
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
SECTION 6.1 Conditions to Each Party's Obligation to Effect the
Merger. The respective obligations of each party to effect the Merger are
subject to the satisfaction or waiver on or prior to the Closing Date of the
following conditions:
(a) Shareholders' Approval. The Company Shareholder Approval and the
Parent Shareholder Approval shall each have been obtained.
(b) Governmental and Regulatory Approvals. All consents, approvals
and actions of, filings with and notices to any Governmental Entity
required of the Company, Acquiror, Merger Sub, or any of their Subsidiaries
to consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby,
the failure of which to be obtained or taken is reasonably expected to have
a Material Adverse Effect on the Surviving Corporation and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, shall have been obtained in form and
substance reasonably satisfactory to Acquiror.
(c) No Injunctions or Restraints. No judgment, order, decree,
statute, law, ordinance, rule or regulation, entered, enacted, promulgated,
enforced or issued by any court or other Governmental Entity of competent
jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition (collectively,
"Restraints") affecting the Closing or seeking to prohibit the transactions
contemplated under this Agreement shall be in effect; provided, however,
that the parties asserting this condition shall have used its commercially
reasonable efforts to prevent the entry of any such Restraints and to
appeal as promptly as possible any such Restraints that may be entered.
24
(d) HSR Act. The waiting or similar period (including any extension
thereof) applicable to the consummation of the Merger under the HSR Act and
any applicable Foreign Antitrust Law shall have expired or been terminated.
SECTION 6.2 Conditions to Obligations of Acquiror, Parent and Merger
Sub. The obligations of Acquiror, Parent and Merger Sub to effect the Merger
are further subject to satisfaction or waiver of the following conditions:
(a) Representations and Warranties. The representations and
warranties of the Company set forth herein shall be true and correct both
when made and at and as of the Closing Date, as if made at and as of such
time (except to the extent expressly made as of an earlier date, in which
case as of such date), except where the failure of such representations and
warranties to be so true and correct (without giving effect to any
limitation as to "materiality" or "Material Adverse Effect" set forth
therein) would not have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect.
(b) Performance of Obligations of the Company. The Company shall have
performed or complied in all material respects to all obligations required
to be performed or complied by it under this Agreement at or prior to the
Closing Date.
(c) No Material Adverse Change. At any time after the date of this
Agreement there shall not have occurred any Material Adverse Change.
(d) Dissenting Shares. Acquiror shall have received evidence, in form
and substance reasonably satisfactory to it, that the number of Dissenting
Shares shall constitute no greater than 10% of the total number of shares
of Company Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the Effective
Time.
(e) Closing Certificate. The Acquiror shall have received on the
Closing Date a closing certificate in the form of Exhibit 4 hereto dated
the Closing Date and executed by the chief executive officer of the Company
certifying to the fulfillment of the conditions specified in SECTIONS 6.1
and 6.2.
(f) Resolutions, etc. The Acquiror shall have received from the
Company a certificate, dated as of the Closing Date, of its secretary or
assistant secretary as to (i) any resolutions of the Company authorizing
the execution, delivery or performance of this Agreement, the Merger or any
other related document; and (ii) the articles of incorporation and code of
regulations of the Company, with any amendments thereto, in effect as of
the date hereof, upon which the Acquiror may conclusively rely until it
shall have received a further certificate of secretary of the Company
canceling or amending such prior articles of incorporation.
(g) Good Standing Certificate. The Company shall provide to the
Acquiror a certificate of the Secretary of State of Ohio as to the
Company's good standing.
(h) Director Resignations. The Company shall deliver or cause to be
delivered to the Acquiror letters of resignation executed by the directors
of the Company effective as of the Effective Time.
SECTION 6.3 Conditions to Obligations of the Company. The obligations of
the Company to effect the Merger are further subject to satisfaction or waiver
of the following conditions:
(a) Representations and Warranties. The representations and
warranties of Acquiror set forth herein shall be true and correct both when
made and at and as of the Closing Date, as if made at and as of such time
(except to the extent expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case
as of such date), except where the failure of such representations and
warranties to be so true and correct (without giving effect to any
limitation as to "materiality" or "Material Adverse Effect" set forth
therein) would not have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect on Acquiror.
(b) Performance of Obligations of Acquiror, Parent and Merger
Sub. Acquiror, Parent and Merger Sub shall have performed or complied in
all material respects to all obligations required to be performed or
complied by them under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date.
(c) Exchange Fund Funding. On or prior to the Closing Date, but prior
to the Effective Time, Parent, Acquiror or Merger Sub shall have deposited
with the Exchange Agent the Exchange Fund.
(d) Payment for Termination of Employment Agreement. Immediately
prior to the Effective Time, Parent, Acquiror or Merger Sub shall have
furnished cashiers' checks or wire transfers of funds to each of
25
the employees listed on Section 6.3(d) of the Company Disclosure Schedule
in the aggregate amount of $2.4 million.
(e) Closing Certificate. The Company shall have received on the
Closing Date a closing certificate in the form of Exhibit 5 dated the
Closing Date and executed by the chief executive officer of Parent
certifying to the fulfillment of the conditions specified in SECTIONS 6.1
and 6.3.
SECTION 6.4 Frustration of Closing Conditions. None of Acquiror, Parent
or the Company may rely on the failure of any condition set forth in SECTION 6.1
(Conditions to Each Party's Obligation to Effect the Merger), SECTION 6.2
(Conditions to Obligations of the Acquiror), or SECTION 6.3 (Conditions to
Obligations of the Company), as the case may be, to be satisfied if such failure
was caused by such party's failure to use commercially reasonable efforts to
consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
as required by and subject to SECTION 5.3 (Commercially Reasonable Efforts;
Cooperation).
ARTICLE VII
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
SECTION 7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time
prior to the Effective Time, whether before or after the Company Shareholder
Approval:
(a) By mutual written consent of Acquiror and the Company;
(b) By either Acquiror or the Company:
(i) if the Merger shall not have been consummated by May 15, 2003;
provided, however, that the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant
to this Section 7.1(b)(i) shall not be available to any party whose
failure to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement solely is
the basis for the failure of the Merger to be consummated by such time;
(ii) if the Company Shareholder Approval shall not have been
obtained at a Company Shareholders Meeting duly convened therefor or at
any adjournment or postponement thereof; or
(iii) if any Restraint having any of the effects set forth in
SECTION 6.1(C) shall be in effect and shall have become final and
nonappealable; provided, however, that the party seeking to terminate
this Agreement pursuant to this SECTION 7.1(B)(III) shall have used
commercially reasonable efforts to prevent the entry of and to remove
such Restraint;
(c) By Acquiror, if the Company shall have breached or failed to
perform in any material respect any of its representations, warranties,
covenants or other agreements contained in this Agreement, which breach or
failure to perform would give rise to a Material Adverse Effect relating to
the Company and (A) is not cured within 30 days after written notice
thereof or (B) is incapable of being cured by the Company;
(d) By the Company, if Acquiror, Parent or Merger Sub shall have
breached or failed to perform in any material respect any of their
respective representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements
contained in this Agreement, which breach or failure to perform includes
failure to fully fund the Exchange Fund and (A) is not cured within 30 days
after written notice thereof or (B) is incapable of being cured by
Acquiror;
(e) By the Company upon the Company's execution of a binding agreement
with a third party with respect to a Superior Proposal, provided that for
any termination by the Company under this SECTION 7.1(E) to be effective,
the Company must have complied with all provisions of this Agreement,
including the notice provisions contained in SECTION 4.4(B) and paid the
Termination Fee and expense reimbursement to Acquiror in accordance with
SECTION 7.3;
(f) by the Company if any event, circumstance, condition, fact, effect
or other matter has occurred or exists which (i) would, or would be
reasonably likely to give rise to the failure of any of the conditions to
the obligations of the Parent, Merger Sub or Acquiror set forth in SECTION
6.1 OR 6.3; and (ii) cannot be or has not been cured within 30 days after
the giving of written notice to the Acquiror;
(g) by Acquiror if any event, circumstance, condition, fact, effect or
other matter has occurred or exists which (i) would, or would be reasonably
likely to give rise to the failure of any of the conditions of the
26
Company set forth in SECTION 6.1 OR 6.2; and (ii) cannot be or has not been
cured within 30 days after the giving of written notice to the Company;
(h) by Acquiror if any of the following shall have occurred:
(i) any Person (other than Acquiror or any Subsidiary of Acquiror)
shall have commenced (as such term is defined in Rule 14d-2 under the
Exchange Act), a tender offer or exchange offer to purchase any Company
Common Stock or securities convertible into such shares such that, upon
consummation of such offer, such person would own or control 50% or more
of the then outstanding Company Common Stock, and the Board of Directors
of the Company, within ten Business Days after such tender or exchange
offer shall have been so commenced, fails to recommend against
acceptance of such tender or exchange offer by its shareholders;
(ii) the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company shall have
authorized, recommended, proposed or publicly announced an intention to
authorize, recommend or propose, or entered into, an agreement with any
Person (other than Acquiror or any Subsidiary of Acquiror) to (A) effect
a merger, consolidation or similar transaction involving the Company or
any of its material Subsidiaries, (B) sell, lease or otherwise dispose
of assets of the Company or its Subsidiaries representing 20% or more of
the consolidated assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries or (C)
issue, sell or otherwise dispose of (including by way of merger,
consolidation, tender offer, share exchange or any similar transaction)
securities (or options, rights or warrants to purchase, or securities
convertible into, such securities) representing 10% or more of the
voting power of the Company;
(iii) any Person (other than Acquiror or any Subsidiary of
Acquiror) shall have acquired beneficial ownership (as such term is
defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) or the right to acquire
beneficial ownership of, or any "group" (as such term is defined under
the Exchange Act) shall have been formed which beneficially owns or has
the right to acquire beneficial ownership of, 15% or more of the then
outstanding Company Common Stock, except for any Person that
beneficially owns more than 15% of the outstanding Company Common Stock
as of the date of this Agreement, unless such Person's beneficial
ownership increases by more than 1% of the outstanding Company Common
Stock; or
(iv) the Company's Board of Directors shall have withdrawn or
modified in a manner adverse to Acquiror the recommendation of the
Company's Board of Directors that the shareholders approve this
Agreement and the Merger (an "Adverse Recommendation") (it being
understood and agreed that any communication by the Company or the
Company's Board of Directors to the shareholders that indicates that the
Company's Board of Directors had determined not to withdraw or modify
such recommendation, in whole or in part, because such action would or
might give rise to a right on the part of Acquiror to terminate this
Agreement and/or obligate the Company to pay the fee set forth in
SECTION 7.3(B) shall nevertheless be deemed to be an Adverse
Recommendation).
SECTION 7.2 Effect of Termination. In the event of termination of this
Agreement by either the Company or Acquiror as provided in SECTION 7.1, this
Agreement shall forthwith become void and have no effect, without any liability
or obligation on the part of Acquiror or the Company, other than pursuant to the
provisions of this SECTION 7.2, SECTION 7.3 and ARTICLE VIII, which provisions
survive such termination; provided, however, that nothing herein shall relieve
any party to this Agreement from any liability for any willful and material
breach by such party of any of its representations, warranties, covenants or
agreements set forth in this Agreement.
SECTION 7.3 Fees and Expenses.
(a) Expenses. If this Agreement is terminated in connection with any of
the circumstances described in SECTION 7.3(B), the Company shall reimburse
Acquiror and Merger Sub for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and fees
payable by Acquiror or Merger Sub in connection with the Merger; provided,
however, that the Company shall not be obligated to reimburse Acquiror and
Merger Sub for expenses in excess of Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000)
in the aggregate. Any such required reimbursement shall take place on the later
of the termination of this Agreement or submission of evidence of such incurred
expenses to the Company.
(b) Termination Fee. If this Agreement is terminated (i) pursuant to
SECTION 7.1(H) within two (2) Business Days after such termination, or (ii)
pursuant to SECTION 7.1(E) on the date of such termination, the Company
27
shall pay Acquiror a fee of Five Million Three Hundred Thousand Dollars
($5,300,000), by wire transfer to an account specified by Parent (the
"Termination Fee").
(c) Other Expenses. Except as provided otherwise in paragraph (a) above,
all costs and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement, and the
transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the party incurring such
expenses, whether or not the Merger is consummated.
ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION 8.1 Survival of Representations and Warranties. None of the
representations and warranties in this Agreement or in any instrument delivered
pursuant to this Agreement shall survive the Effective Time. This SECTION 8.1
shall not limit any covenant or agreement of the parties which by its terms
contemplates performance after the Effective Time.
SECTION 8.2 Notices. All notices, requests, claims, demands and other
communications under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed
given if delivered personally, telecopied (which is confirmed) or sent by
overnight courier (providing proof of delivery) to the parties at the following
addresses (or at such other address for a party as shall be specified by like
notice):
(a) if to the Company, to:
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
7005 Cochran Road
Glenwillow, Ohio 44139
Facsimile No.: (440) 996-2027
Attention: Michael J. Merriman,
Chief Executive Officer
with a copy to:
Kahn Kleinman, A Legal Professional Association
2600 Erieview Tower
1301 East Ninth Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1824
Facsimile No.: (216) 623-4912
Attention: Marc H. Morgenstern, Esq. or
Michael A. Ellis, Esq.
(b) if to Acquiror, Parent or Merger Sub, to:
TechTronic Industries Co, Ltd.
24/F., CDW Bldg.,
388 Castle Peak Rd.
Tsuen Wan, N.T., Hong Kong
Facsimile No.: 011-852-2413-0620
Attention: Horst Pudwill,
Chief Executive Officer
with a copy to:
Willkie Farr & Gallagher
787 Seventh Ave
New York, NY 10019
Facsimile No.: 212-728-9237
Attention: Bruce R. Kraus, Esq.
SECTION 8.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more
counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement and
shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of
the parties and delivered to the other parties.
28
SECTION 8.4 Specific Performance. The parties hereto agree that
irreparable damage would occur in the event that any of the provisions of this
Agreement were not performed in accordance with their specific terms or were
otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the parties shall be entitled
to an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to
enforce specifically the terms and provisions hereof in any court of the United
States or any state having jurisdiction without the necessity of posting a bond,
this being in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or
in equity.
SECTION 8.5 Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries. This
Agreement (including the documents and instruments referred to herein), and the
Confidentiality Agreement (a) constitute the entire agreement, and supersede all
prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the parties
with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement and (b) except for the
provisions of SECTION 5.4 and SECTION 5.6, are not intended to confer upon any
Person other than the parties any rights or remedies.
SECTION 8.6 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and
construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Ohio, without regard to
principles of conflict of laws thereof.
SECTION 8.7 Assignment. Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights,
interests or obligations under this Agreement shall be assigned, in whole or in
part, by operation of law or otherwise by any of the parties hereto without the
prior written consent of the other party; provided, however, that RAMC Holdings,
Inc. may assign its rights and obligations hereunder to Parent, or to any direct
or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent. Any assignment in violation of
the preceding sentence shall be void. Subject to the preceding two sentences,
this Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable
by, the parties and their respective successors and assigns.
SECTION 8.8 Consent to Jurisdiction. Each of the parties hereto (a)
consents to submit itself to the personal jurisdiction of any federal court
located in the State of Delaware or any Delaware state court, in the event any
dispute arises out of this Agreement or any of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, (b) agrees that it will not attempt to deny or defeat such
personal jurisdiction by motion or other request for leave from any such court,
and (c) agrees that it will not bring any action relating to this Agreement or
any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement in any court other than a
federal court sitting in the State of Delaware or a Delaware state court.
SECTION 8.9 Interpretation. When a reference is made in this Agreement to
an Article, Section or Exhibit, such reference shall be to an Article or Section
of, or an Exhibit to, this Agreement unless otherwise indicated. The table of
contents and headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes
only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this
Agreement. Whenever the words "include", "includes" or "including" are used in
this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words "without
limitation". The words "hereof", "herein" and "hereunder" and words of similar
import when used in this Agreement shall refer to this Agreement as a whole and
not to any particular provision of this Agreement. All terms defined in this
Agreement shall have the defined meanings when used in any certificate or other
document made or delivered pursuant hereto unless otherwise defined therein. The
definitions contained in this Agreement are applicable to the singular as well
as the plural forms of such terms and to the masculine as well as to the
feminine and neuter genders of such term. The language used in this Agreement
shall be deemed to be the language chosen by the parties to express their mutual
intent, and no rule of strict construction will be applied against any party.
Any references to any federal, state, local or foreign statute or law shall also
refer to all rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, unless the context
requires otherwise.
SECTION 8.10 Headings. The headings contained in this Agreement are for
reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement.
SECTION 8.11 Severability. If any term or other provision of this
Agreement is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced by any rule of law
or public policy, all other conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall
nevertheless remain in full force and effect. Upon such determination that any
term or other provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced, the
parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to
effect the original intent of the parties as closely as possible to the fullest
extent permitted by applicable law in an acceptable manner so that the
transactions contemplated hereby are fulfilled to the extent possible.
SECTION 8.12 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by the parties at
any time before or after the Company Shareholder Approval; provided, however,
that after any such Company Shareholder Approval,
29
there shall not be made any amendment affecting the Merger Consideration or that
by law requires further approval by the shareholders of the Company without the
further approval of such shareholders. This Agreement may not be amended except
by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of each of the parties.
SECTION 8.13 Extension; Waiver. At any time prior to the Effective Time,
a party may (a) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or
other acts of the other party, (b) waive any inaccuracies in the representations
and warranties of another party contained in this Agreement or in any document
delivered pursuant to this Agreement or (c) subject to the proviso of SECTION
8.11, waive compliance by any party with any of the agreements or conditions
contained in this Agreement. Any agreement on the part of a party to any such
extension or waiver shall be valid only if set forth in an instrument in writing
signed on behalf of such party. The failure of any party to this Agreement to
assert any of its rights under this Agreement or otherwise shall not constitute
a waiver of such rights.
SECTION 8.14 Schedules. The Company has set forth information in the
Company Disclosure Schedule in a section thereof that corresponds to the section
of this Agreement to which it relates. Such information will qualify other
sections hereof, and be deemed included in the Company Disclosure Schedule for
such other section, only to the extent that such applicability is manifestly
evident on the face of such disclosures. The fact that any item of information
is disclosed in the Company Disclosure Schedule to this Agreement shall not be
construed to mean that such information is required to be disclosed by this
Agreement or is necessarily material.
[THIS SPACE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]
30
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement and Plan
of Merger to be signed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized,
all as of the date first written above.
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
By:
------------------------------------
Name:
Title:
RAMC HOLDINGS, INC.
By:
------------------------------------
Name:
Title:
TIC ACQUISITION CORP.
By:
------------------------------------
Name:
Title:
TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.
By:
------------------------------------
Name:
Title:
31
APPENDIX A
DEFINITIONS
For purposes of this Agreement:
"Acquiror" has the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
"Acquiror Disclosure Schedule" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.2(c).
"Adjustment Event" has the meaning set forth in Section 2.4.
"Affiliate" of any Person means another Person that directly or indirectly,
through one or more intermediaries, Controls, is Controlled by, or is under
common Control with, such first Person.
"Agreement" has the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
"Balance Sheet" means the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of
September 30, 2002.
"Certificates" has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(b).
"Certificate of Merger" has the meaning set forth in Section 1.3.
"Closing" has the meaning set forth in Section 1.2.
"Closing Date" has the meaning set forth in Section 1.2.
"Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
"Company" has the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
"Company Benefit Plans" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(j).
"Company Common Stock" has the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
"Company Disclosure Schedule" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1.
"Company Permits" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(i).
"Company Preferred Stock" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(c).
"Company Rights Agreement" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(t).
"Company SEC Documents" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(f).
"Company Stock Options" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(c).
"Company Shareholder Approval" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(t).
"Company Shareholders Meeting" has the meaning set forth in Section 5.1(b).
"Company Stock Plans" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(c).
"Company Takeover Proposal" means any inquiry, proposal or offer from any
person relating to any (a) direct or indirect acquisition or purchase of a
business that constitutes 20% or more of the net revenues, net income or the
assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (b) direct or
indirect acquisition or purchase of 20% or more of any class of equity
securities of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries whose business constitutes
20% or more of the net revenues, net income or assets of the Company and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (c) tender offer or exchange offer that if
consummated would result in any person beneficially owning 20% or more of any
class of equity securities of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries whose
business constitutes 20% or more of the net revenues, net income or assets of
the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (d) merger,
consolidation, business combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution
or similar transaction involving the Company or any of its Subsidiaries whose
business constitutes 50% or more of the net revenues, net income or assets of
the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other than the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
"Confidentiality Agreement" has the meaning set forth in Section 5.2.
A-1
"Consent" shall mean any approval consent, ratification, permission, waiver
or authorization (including any License or Governmental authorization).
"Control" means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to
direct or cause the direction of the management policies of a Person, whether
through the ownership of voting securities, by contract, or otherwise.
"Dissenting Shares" has the meaning set forth in Section 2.5.
"Effective Time" has the meaning set forth in Section 1.3.
"ERISA" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(j).
"ERISA Affiliate" means any trade or business, whether or not incorporated,
that together with the Company would be deemed to be a "single employer" within
the meaning of Section 4001(b) of ERISA.
"Exchange Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
"Exchange Agent" has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(a).
"Exchange Fund" has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(a).
"Fairness Opinion" shall mean the opinion referenced in Section 3.1(m).
"Financial Advisor" means NatCity Investments, Inc.
"Foreign Antitrust Laws" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(e).
"GAAP" means United States generally accepted accounting principles.
"Governmental Entity" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(e).
"HSR Act" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(e).
"Indebtedness" means (without duplication), with respect to any Person,
whether recourse is to all or a portion of the assets of such Person, (i) the
principal of and premium, if any, in respect of any indebtedness of such Person
for money borrowed, (ii) the principal, premium, if any, and interest of such
Person with respect to obligations evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes or,
except for accrued liabilities arising in the Ordinary Course of Business, other
similar instruments, including obligations incurred in connection with the
acquisition of property, assets or businesses (other than trade payables which
are not overdue or in default), (iii) all obligations of such Person in respect
of letters of credit or other similar instruments (including reimbursement
obligations with respect thereto) but only to the extent of drawings thereunder,
(iv) every obligation of such Person issued or assumed as the deferred purchase
price of property or services (excluding trade accounts payable or accrued
liabilities arising in the Ordinary Course of Business which are not overdue or
in default), (v) every capital lease obligation (determined in accordance with
GAAP) of such Person, (vi) all Indebtedness of other Persons secured by a Lien
on any asset of such Person, whether or not such Indebtedness is assumed by such
Person; provided, however, that the amount of such Indebtedness shall be the
lesser of (A) the fair market value of such asset at such date of determination
and (B) the amount of such Indebtedness of such other Persons, (vii) every
obligation to pay rent or other payment amounts of such Person with respect to
any sale-leaseback transaction to which such Person is a party, payable through
the stated maturity of such sale-leaseback transaction, (viii) factoring
arrangements of such Person, whether or not such arrangements appear on the
balance sheet of such Person; and (ix) every obligation of the type referred to
in clauses (i) through (viii) of another Person the payment of which, in any
case, such Person has guaranteed or is responsible or liable, directly or
indirectly, as obligor, guarantor or otherwise.
"Indemnitees" have the meaning set forth in Section 5.4(a).
"Insurance Policies" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(w).
"Knowledge" means the actual knowledge of those individuals listed on
Section 6.3(d) of the Company Disclosure Schedule.
"Legal Requirement" means any federal, state, local, municipal, foreign,
international, multinational or other Order, constitution law, rule ordinance,
permit, principle of common law, regulation, statute or treaty.
"Liens" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(b).
A-2
"Material Adverse Change" or "Material Adverse Effect" means any change,
effect, event, occurrence or state of facts that is, has had or is reasonably
likely to have a material and adverse effect to the business, financial
condition, results of operations or prospects of the Company and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, other than any change, effect, event or
occurrence (i) relating to the economy or capital or securities markets of the
United States or any other region in general, including changes in interest or
exchange rates, (ii) resulting from entering into this Agreement or the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby or the announcement
thereof, or (iii) relating to its business, financial condition or results of
operations that has been disclosed in writing to the other party prior to the
date of this Agreement. The parties agree that termination of the employment of
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company under circumstances that trigger the
severance payment under Section 7A of his employment agreement, dated of even
date herewith, shall constitute a Material Adverse Change.
"Merger" has the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
"Merger Consideration" has the meaning set forth in Section 2.1(b).
"Merger Sub" has the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
"Ohio Statutes" means the Ohio General Corporation Law.
"Order" means any administrative award, decision, injunction, judgment,
order, ruling, subpoena, or verdict entered, issued, made, or rendered by any
court, administrative agency, or other Governmental Entity.
"Ordinary Course of Business" has the meaning set forth in Section
3.1(f)(ii).
"Parent" has the meaning set forth in the recitals.
"Parent Shareholder Approval" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.2(c).
"Permitted Liens" means, with respect to any asset, (i) covenants,
conditions, restrictions, encroachments, encumbrances, easements, rights of way,
licenses, grants, building or use restrictions, exceptions, reservations,
limitations or other imperfections of title (other than a Lien securing any
Indebtedness) with respect to such asset which, individually or in the
aggregate, does not materially detract from the value of, or materially
interfere with the present occupancy or use of, such asset and the continuation
of the present occupancy or use of such asset; (ii) the matters set forth on
Section 3.1(v) of the Company Disclosure Schedule; (iii) unfiled mechanic's,
materialmen's and similar liens with respect to amounts not yet due and payable
or which are being contested in good faith through appropriate proceedings and,
for those existing on the date of the Balance Sheet, for which adequate reserves
in accordance with GAAP are reflected on the Balance Sheet, or arose subsequent
to September 30, 2002 in the Ordinary Course of Business; (iv) liens for Taxes
not yet delinquent or which are being contested in good faith through
appropriate proceedings and, for those existing on the date of the Balance
Sheet, for which adequate reserves in accordance with GAAP are reflected on the
Balance Sheet, or arose subsequent to September 30, 2002 in the Ordinary Course
of Business; and (v) liens securing rental payments under capital lease
arrangements, which capital lease arrangements if existing on the date of the
Balance Sheet were reflected on the Balance Sheet, or arose subsequent to the
date of the Balance Sheet in the Ordinary Course of Business.
"Person" means an individual, corporation, partnership, limited liability
company, joint venture, association, trust, unincorporated organization or other
entity.
"Preliminary Proxy Statement" has the meaning set forth in Section 5.1(a).
"Product" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(z).
"Product Claim" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(z).
"Proxy Statement" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(e).
"Restraints" has the meaning set forth in Section 6.1(c).
"SEC" means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
"Securities Act" means the Securities Act of 1933.
"Stock Reference Date" has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(c).
"Subsidiary" of any Person means another Person of which sufficient voting
securities, other voting ownership, or voting partnership interests (or, if
there are no such voting interests, 50% or more of the equity
A-3
interests) of such Person to elect at least a majority of its Board of Directors
or other governing body are owned, directly or indirectly, by such first Person.
"Superior Proposal" means any bona fide written offer for a Company
Takeover Proposal by a Third Party that, the Board of Directors of the Company
determines in good faith, has the good faith intent to proceed with negotiations
and the financial and other capabilities to consummate the Company Takeover
Proposal, taking into account, among other things, the legal, financial,
regulatory and other aspects of such Company Takeover Proposal, (i) on terms
which the Board of Directors of the Company determines in its good faith
judgment (based on the advice of its legal and financial advisors) is more
favorable to the constituencies of the Company that may be considered by the
directors of the Company under Section 1701.59(E) of the Ohio Statutes, and (ii)
that is reasonably capable of being completed.
"Surviving Corporation" has the meaning set forth in Section 1.1.
"Taxes" means all (x) federal, state, local or foreign net and gross
income, alternative or add-on minimum, environmental, gross receipts, ad
valorem, value added, goods and services, capital stock, profits, license,
single business, employment, severance, stamp, unemployment, customs, property,
sales, excise, use, occupation, service, transfer, payroll, social security,
franchise, withholding and other taxes or similar governmental duties, charges,
fees, levies or other assessments including any interest, penalties or additions
with respect thereto, (y) liability for the payment of any amounts of the type
described in clause (x) as a result of being a member of an affiliated,
consolidated, combined or unitary group, and (z) liability for the payment of
any amounts as a result of being party to any tax sharing agreement or as a
result of any express or implied obligation to indemnify any other person with
respect to the payment of any amounts of the type described in clause (x) or
(y).
"Termination Fee" has the meaning set forth in Section 7.3(b).
"Third Party" means any Person or group other than the Company, the
Acquiror, Parent, Merger Sub or any of their respective Affiliates.
"Withholding Amount" has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(h).
A-4
EXHIBIT 1
VOTING AGREEMENT
THIS VOTING AGREEMENT, dated as of December 16, 2002 (this "Agreement"), is
made by and among TechTronic Industries, Inc., a Hong Kong corporation
("Parent"), Richmont Capital Partners I, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
("Richmont"), and E. Patrick Nalley, individually and as Trustee of the Eldon P.
Nalley D/T/D January 18, 1993 ("Nalley" and, together with Richmont, each a
"Shareholder" and collectively, the "Shareholders").
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, as of the date hereof, each of the Shareholders owns beneficially
the number of common shares without par value (the "Company Common Shares") of
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co., an Ohio corporation (the "Company"), in each case as
set forth opposite such Shareholder's name on the signature page hereof (such
shares, together with any Company Common Shares acquired by any Shareholder
prior to the termination of this Agreement, are collectively referred to herein
as the "Shares");
WHEREAS, concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, Parent, RAMC
Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Acquiror"), TIC Acquisition Corp., an
Ohio corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Acquiror ("Merger Sub"), and the
Company are entering into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of the date
hereof (the "Merger Agreement"; capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined
herein shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in the Merger
Agreement), pursuant to which, upon the terms and subject to the conditions
thereof, Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company (the "Merger"); and
WHEREAS, as a condition to the willingness of the Company, Parent,
Acquiror, and Merger Sub to enter into the Merger Agreement, Parent has
requested each of the Shareholders to agree, and in order to induce Parent to
enter into the Merger Agreement, such Shareholders are willing to agree, to vote
in favor of adopting the Merger Agreement and approving the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, upon the terms and subject to
the conditions set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants
and agreements contained herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the
parties hereby agree, severally and not jointly, as follows:
Section 1. Voting of Shares.
(a) Until the termination of this Agreement in accordance with the terms
hereof, each Shareholder hereby agrees that, at the Shareholders' Meeting of the
Company or any other meeting of the shareholders of the Company, however called,
each Shareholder will (i) appear at such meeting or otherwise cause its Shares
to be counted as present thereat for purposes of establishing a quorum, and (ii)
vote all of such Shareholder's Shares (A) in favor of the adoption of the Merger
Agreement and the approval of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
by the Merger Agreement, and (B) against any action or agreement that is
inconsistent with the Merger or would reasonably be expected to result in a
breach of any covenant, representation or warranty or any other obligation or
agreement of the Company under the Merger Agreement or which would reasonably be
expected to result in any of the conditions to the Merger Agreement not being
fulfilled. In addition, each Shareholder agrees that it will, upon request by
the Parent, furnish written confirmation, in form and substance reasonably
acceptable to Parent, of such Shareholder's vote in favor of the Merger
Agreement and the Merger.
(b) In the event that any Shareholder fails to satisfy its obligations
under clauses (a)(i) or (a)(ii) above, each Shareholder hereby grants Parent a
power of attorney up to and through the termination of this Agreement to execute
and deliver a proxy in the form attached hereto as Annex A for and on behalf of
such Shareholder.
(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in this Agreement shall (i)
limit or restrict any Shareholder, or any affiliate thereof, from acting in his
capacity as director or officer of the Company, to the extent applicable, it
being understood that this Agreement shall apply to any such Shareholder solely
in his capacity as a Shareholder of the Company and (ii) nothing in this
Agreement shall be interpreted as obligating the Shareholders to exercise any
options to acquire Shares.
Section 2. Transfer of Shares. Each Shareholder represents and warrants
that it has no present intention of taking action to, prior to the termination
of this Agreement, and shall not, directly or indirectly, (a) sell, assign,
1
transfer (including by operation of law), tender or otherwise dispose of any of
the Shares, (b) deposit any of the Shares into a voting trust or enter into a
voting agreement or arrangement with respect to the Shares or grant any proxy or
power of attorney with respect thereto which is inconsistent with this
Agreement, or (c) enter into any contract, option or other arrangement or
undertaking with respect to the direct or indirect sale, transfer (including by
operation of law) or other disposition of any Shares. Notwithstanding anything
to the contrary in clauses (a) and (c) above, any Shareholder may transfer any
or all of its Shares; provided, however, that in any such case, prior to and as
a condition to the effectiveness of such transfer, each person as to which any
of such Shares or any interest in any of such Shares is or may be transferred
shall have executed and delivered to each of the Company and Parent a
counterpart to this Agreement pursuant to which such person shall be bound by
all of the terms and provisions of this Agreement.
Section 3. Purchase of Shares. Each Shareholder agrees that it shall not
directly or indirectly acquire additional Shares except pursuant to the exercise
of any option to purchase Shares in which such Shareholder has an interest as of
the date hereof.
Section 4. Agreement of Parent. Parent hereby covenants and agrees with
the Shareholders that it shall take all reasonably necessary actions to ensure
that immediately following the Effective Time, each Shareholder or its designee
shall receive the Merger Consideration in immediately available funds with
respect to the number of Shares for which such Shareholder is entitled to
receive Merger Consideration pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement,
provided that such Shareholder or its designee shall have surrendered to Parent
a Certificate or Certificates evidencing such number of Shares together with a
letter or letters of transmittal in accordance with Section 2.3 of the Merger
Agreement, duly executed and completed in accordance with the instructions
thereto.
Section 5. Representations, Warranties and Covenants of Shareholder. Each
Shareholder hereby represents, warrants and covenants to Parent with respect to
itself and its ownership of its Shares as follows:
(a) Shareholder has all legal capacity to execute and deliver this
Agreement and to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.
(b) Shareholder is the beneficial owner of its Shares and will
continue to be the beneficial owner of its Shares until the termination of
this Agreement, except as permitted by Section 2 of this Agreement.
(c) This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by such
Shareholder.
(d) This Agreement constitutes the valid and binding agreement of such
Shareholder, enforceable against Shareholder in accordance with its terms,
except as such enforceability may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization, moratorium and similar laws relating to or affecting
creditors' rights generally, by general equity principles, (regardless of
whether such enforceability is considered in a proceeding in equity or at
law) or by an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
(e) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Shareholder does
not, and the performance of this Agreement by Shareholder will not, (i)
conflict with or violate any trust agreement or other similar documents
relating to any trust of which Shareholder is trustee, (ii) conflict with
or violate any law applicable to Shareholder or by which Shareholder or any
of Shareholder's properties is bound or affected or (iii) result in any
breach of or constitute a default (or an event that with notice or lapse of
time or both would become a default) under, or give to others any rights of
termination, acceleration or cancellation of, or result in the creation of
a lien or encumbrance on any assets of Shareholder, including, without
limitation, Shareholder's Shares, pursuant to, any note, bond, mortgage,
indenture, contract, agreement, lease, license, permit, franchise or other
instrument or obligation to which Shareholder is a party or by which
Shareholder or any of Shareholder's assets is bound or affected, except for
any such breaches, defaults, conflicts, violations or other occurrences
that would not prevent or delay the performance by Shareholder of
Shareholder's obligations under this Agreement.
(f) Until the termination of this Agreement, Shareholder will not (and
will use Shareholder's reasonable best efforts to cause the Company, its
respective officers, directors and employees, and any investment banker,
attorney, accountant or other advisor or representative of Shareholder or
the Company or any of the same not to) (i) solicit, initiate or knowingly
encourage (including by furnishing nonpublic information) any inquiries or
the making of any proposal or offer that constitutes, or may reasonably be
expected to lead to a Company takeover, (ii) participate in any discussions
or negotiations in furtherance of such inquiries or to obtain a Company
Takeover Proposal, or the making of any proposal that constitutes any
2
Company Takeover Proposal, or (iii) or knowingly facilitate any effort or
attempt to make or implement a Company Takeover Proposal. Notwithstanding
any provision of this Section 3(f) to the contrary, any Shareholder that is
a member of the Company's Board of Directors may take actions in such
capacity to the extent permitted by the Merger Agreement.
(g) Shareholder hereby waives any rights of appraisal or rights to
dissent from the Merger.
(h) Shareholder agrees to execute and deliver any additional documents
necessary, in the reasonable opinion of Parent, to carry out the purpose
and intent of this Agreement.
(i) Shareholder understands and acknowledges that Parent is entering
into the Merger Agreement in reliance upon the execution and delivery of
this Agreement by Shareholder.
Section 6. Representations and Warranties of Parent. Parent hereby
represents and warrants to the Shareholders as follows:
(a) Parent is a company duly organized and validly existing under the
laws of the jurisdiction of its incorporation. Parent has all necessary
corporate power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery
of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby by Parent have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the
part of Parent.
(b) (i) No filing with any governmental authority and no
authorization, consent or approval of any other Person is necessary for the
execution of this Agreement by Parent and the consummation by Parent of the
transactions contemplated hereby and (ii) none of the execution and
delivery of this Agreement by Parent, the consummation by Parent of the
transactions contemplated hereby shall (A) conflict with or result in any
breach of the organizational documents of Parent, (B) result in, or give
rise to, a violation or breach of or a default under any of the terms of
any material contract, understanding, agreement or other instrument or
obligation to which Parent is a party or by which Parent or any of its
assets may be bound, or (C) violate any applicable order, writ, injunction,
decree, judgment, statute, rule or regulation, except for any of the
foregoing as could not reasonably be expected to impair Parent's ability to
perform its obligations under this Agreement.
(c) Parent understands and acknowledges that the Shareholders are
entering into this Agreement in reliance upon the execution and delivery of
the Merger Agreement by Parent.
Section 7. Termination. This Agreement shall terminate upon the earliest
to occur of (i) the Effective Time, (ii) the termination of the Merger Agreement
in accordance with the terms thereof, (iii) the mutual consent of the parties
hereto, or (iv) the date set forth in Section 7.1(b)(i) of the Merger Agreement;
provided that no such termination shall relieve any party of liability for a
breach hereof prior to termination.
Section 8. Expenses. Each party hereto shall be responsible for its own
fees and expenses (including, without limitation, the fees and expenses of
financial consultants, investment bankers, accountants and counsel) in
connection with the entering into of this Agreement.
Section 9. Miscellaneous.
(a) This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties
hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior
agreements and understandings, both written and oral, between the parties with
respect to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement is not intended to confer
upon any other person any rights or remedies hereunder. This Agreement may not
be amended, modified or rescinded except by an instrument in writing signed by
each of the parties hereto.
(b) Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations
hereunder shall be assigned by operation of Law (including by merger or
consolidation) or otherwise without the prior written consent of the other
parties hereto. Any assignment in violation of the preceding sentence shall be
void. Subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement will be binding upon,
inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their
respective successors and assigns.
(c) The failure of any party hereto to exercise any right, power or remedy
provided under this Agreement or otherwise available in respect hereof at law or
in equity, or to insist upon compliance by any other party hereto with its
obligations hereunder, and any custom or practice of the parties at variance
with the terms hereof shall
3
not constitute a waiver by such party of its right to exercise any such or other
right, power, or remedy or to demand such compliance. Each of the parties hereto
agrees that it will use its reasonable best efforts to do all things necessary
to effectuate this Agreement.
(d) All notices, requests, claims, demands and other communications to be
given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed given (i)
three (3) business days following sending by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, (ii) when sent if sent by facsimile; provided, however, that
the fax is promptly confirmed by telephone confirmation thereof, (iii) when
delivered, if delivered personally to the intended recipient, and (iv) one
business day following sending by overnight delivery via a national courier
service, and in each case, addressed to a party at the following address for
such party:
if to the Shareholders:
c/o Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
7005 Cochran Road
Glenwillow, Ohio 44139-4303
Attention: Chief Executive Officer
Facsimile: (440) 996-2027
with a copy to:
Kahn Kleinman, a Legal Professional Association
2600 Erieview Tower
1301 East Ninth Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
Attention: Marc H. Morgenstern, Esq.
Facsimile: (216) 623-4912
If to Parent:
Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd.
24/F, CDW Bldg.
388 Castle Peak Road
Tsuen Wan, N.T.
Hong Kong
Attention: Horst Pudwill, Chief Executive Officer
Facsimile: +852-2413-0620
With a copy to:
Willkie Farr & Gallagher
787 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Attention: Bruce R. Kraus, Esq.
Facsimile: (212) 728-8111
or to such other address as the person to whom notice is given may have
previously furnished to the other in writing in the manner set forth above.
(e) This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of Ohio, without giving effect to the choice of law
provisions thereof.
(f) The descriptive headings herein are inserted for convenience of
reference only and are not intended to be part of or to affect the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement.
(g) The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable and the
invalidity or unenforceability of any provision shall not affect the validity or
enforceability of the other provisions hereof. If any provision of this
Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or any circumstance, is
invalid or unenforceable, (a) if necessary, a suitable and equitable provision
shall be substituted therefor in order to carry out, so far as may be valid and
enforceable, the intent and purpose of such invalid or unenforceable provision
and (b) the remainder of this Agreement and the application of such provision to
other persons or circumstances shall not be affected by
4
such invalidity or unenforceability, nor shall such invalidity or
unenforceability affect the validity or enforceability of such provision, or the
application thereof, in any other jurisdiction.
(h) The parties agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event that
any of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed in accordance with
their specific terms or were otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that,
in addition to any other members at law or in equity, the parties shall be
entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement
and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this Agreement.
(i) This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of
which shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall become effective
when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and
delivered to the other parties.
(j) The words "hereof," "herein" and "herewith" and words of similar import
shall, unless otherwise stated, be construed to refer to this Agreement as a
whole and not to any particular provision of this Agreement, and section and
paragraph references are to the sections and paragraphs of this Agreement unless
otherwise specified. Whenever the words "include," "includes" or "including" are
used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words
"without limitation." All terms defined in this Agreement shall have the defined
meanings contained herein when used in any certificate or other document made or
delivered pursuant hereto unless otherwise defined therein. Any agreement,
instrument or statute defined or referred to herein or in any agreement or
instrument that is referred to herein means such, instrument or statute as from
time to time, amended, qualified or supplemented, including (in the case of
agreements and instruments) by waiver or consent and (in the case of statutes)
by succession of comparable successor statutes and all attachments thereto and
instruments incorporated therein. References to a person are also to its
permitted successors and assigns.
(k) The parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting
of this Agreement. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or
interpretation arises, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly
by the parties and no presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or
disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any provisions of this
Agreement.
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Agreement to
be executed as of the date first written above.
SHARES HELD OF ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
---------------------------------------
TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
0 By: ----------------------------------------------------
Name: Horst Pudwill
Its: Chief Executive Officer
RICHMONT CAPITAL PARTNERS I, L.P.
2,969,900 By: J.R. Investment Corp.
Its: General Partner
By: ----------------------------------------------
Name: John Rochon
Its: President
1,020,000 --------------------------------------------------------
E. PATRICK NALLEY, Individually and
as Trustee of the Eldron P. Nalley D/T/D
January 18, 1993
6
ANNEX B
NATCVITY INVESTMENTS, INC. LOGO
December 9, 2002
PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL
Board of Directors
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
7005 Cochran Road
Glenwillow, Ohio 44139
Gentlemen:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point
of view, to the holders of the issued and outstanding Common Shares, without par
value (the "Common Shares"), of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co., an Ohio corporation
(the "Company"), of the consideration to be received by such holders pursuant to
the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") to be entered into by
the Company, RAMC Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Acquiror"),
Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of Hong
Kong ("Parent"), and TIC Acquisition Corp., an Ohio corporation, and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Acquiror ("Merger Sub").
You have advised us that the Merger Agreement contemplates that at the
closing of the transaction contemplated thereby, among other things, Merger Sub
will be merged with and into the Company (the "Merger") and each Common Share of
the Company issued and outstanding as of the closing date (other than shares
owned by Parent or the Company and any of their respective parent entities and
subsidiaries and any shares as to which appraisal rights have been perfected in
accordance with provisions of applicable law) will be converted into the right
to receive the amount of $7.37 per share in cash (the "Merger Consideration").
In connection with rendering this opinion, we have, among other things:
(i) reviewed a draft of the Merger Agreement, dated December 6, 2002,
which we understand to be in substantially final form;
(ii) reviewed a draft of the form of Voting Agreement dated December 6,
2002 for certain shareholders of the Company, which we understand to
be in substantially final form;
(iii) reviewed a draft of the form of Employment Agreement dated December
7, 2002 for certain executives officers of the Company, which we
understand to be in substantially final form;
(iv) reviewed certain publicly available information concerning the
Company, including the Company's Annual Reports on Form 10-K for each
of the fiscal years ended December 31, 1997, December 31, 1998,
December 31, 1999, December 31, 2000, and December 31, 2001, and the
Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for each of the periods
ended March 31, 2002, June 30, 2002, and September 30, 2002;
(v) analyzed certain unaudited internal information, primarily financial
in nature and including projections for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2002 through 2007, prepared and furnished to us by the
Company's management for purposes of our analysis;
(vi) reviewed certain publicly available information concerning the
trading of, and the trading market for, the Company's Common Shares;
(vii) reviewed certain publicly available information with respect to
certain other companies that we believe to be comparable to the
Company and the trading markets for certain of such other companies'
securities;
(viii) compared the proposed financial terms of the Merger with certain
publicly available information concerning the nature and terms of
certain other transactions that we considered to be relevant;
7
Board of Directors
December 9, 2002
Page 2
(ix) discussed past and current operations and financial condition and the
prospects of the Company, as well as other matters we believe
relevant to our inquiry, with certain officers and employees of the
Company; and
(x) conducted such other financial studies, analyses and investigations,
and considered such other information, as we deemed necessary or
appropriate.
In our review and analysis and in arriving at our opinion, we have assumed
and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other
information provided to us or publicly available and have assumed and relied
upon the representations and warranties of the Company contained in the Merger
Agreement. We have not been engaged to, and have not independently attempted to,
verify any of such information. We have also relied upon the management of the
Company as to the reasonableness and achievability of the financial and
operating projections (and the assumptions and bases therefor) provided to us
and, with your consent, we have assumed that such projections reflect
management's best currently available estimates and judgments. We have not been
engaged to assess the reasonableness or achievability of such projections or the
assumptions on which they were based and express no view as to such projections
or assumptions. In addition, we have not evaluated or appraised any of the
assets, properties or facilities of the Company nor have we been furnished with
any such evaluation or appraisal.
At your direction, we have not been asked to, nor do we, offer any opinion
as to the material terms of the Merger Agreement or the form of the transaction
as a merger. We have also assumed, with your consent, that the final executed
form of the Merger Agreement does not differ in any material respect from the
draft we have examined and that the conditions to the Merger as set forth in the
Merger Agreement would be satisfied and that the Merger would be consummated on
a timely basis in the manner contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
It should be noted that this opinion is necessarily based on the economic,
monetary, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made
available to us, as of the date hereof and does not address any matters
subsequent to such date. It should be noted that although subsequent
developments may affect this opinion, we do not have any obligation to update,
revise or reaffirm our opinion. We reserve, however, the right to withdraw,
revise or modify our opinion based upon additional information which may be
provided to or obtained by us after the issuance of the opinion which suggests,
in our judgment, a material change in the assumptions upon which our opinion is
based. Our opinion is limited to the fairness, as of the date hereof, from a
financial point of view, of the Merger Consideration and does not address the
Company's underlying business decision to effect the Merger or any other terms
of the Merger.
We have acted as the Company's financial advisor in connection with the
Merger and will receive a fee for our services, which is contingent upon
completion of the Merger. We will also receive a fee for our services in
rendering this opinion, and the Company has agreed to indemnify us under certain
circumstances.
In the ordinary course of our business, we may actively trade the Company's
Common Shares and other securities of the Company, as well as Parent's common
stock and other securities of Parent, for our own account and for the accounts
of customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in
such securities.
It is understood that this letter was prepared at the request of the Board
of Directors of the Company for its confidential use and may not be reproduced,
disseminated, quoted or referred to at any time, in any manner or for any
purpose without our prior written consent, except that the Company may use this
letter in its entirety as part of any filing made by the Company in respect of
the Merger with the Securities and Exchange Commission and except as otherwise
required by law or any regulatory agency or commission. Our opinion is directed
to the Board of Directors and does not constitute a recommendation to any
shareholder of the Company as to how such shareholder should vote at the
shareholders' meeting held in connection with the Merger.
8
Board of Directors
December 9, 2002
Page 3
Based upon and subject to the foregoing and such other matters as we
consider relevant, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Merger
Consideration is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the
Company's Common Shares.
Very Truly Yours,
/s/ NATCITY INVESTMENTS, INC.
--------------------------------------
NATCITY INVESTMENTS, INC.
9
ANNEX C
SECTIONS 1701.84 AND 1701.85 OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE
RIGHTS OF DISSENTING SHAREHOLDERS
1701.84 DISSENTING SHAREHOLDERS ENTITLED TO RELIEF
The following are entitled to relief as dissenting shareholders under
section 1701.85 of the Revised Code:
(A) Shareholders of a domestic corporation that is being merged or
consolidated into a surviving or new entity, domestic or foreign, pursuant
to section 1701.78, 1701.781, 1701.79, 1701.791, or 1701.801 of the Revised
Code;
(B) In the case of a merger into a domestic corporation, shareholders
of the surviving corporation who under section 1701.78 or 1701.781 of the
Revised Code are entitled to vote on the adoption of an agreement of
merger, but only as to the shares so entitling them to vote;
(C) Shareholders, other than the parent corporation, of a domestic
subsidiary corporation that is being merged into the domestic or foreign
parent corporation pursuant to section 1701.80 of the Revised Code;
(D) In the case of a combination or a majority share acquisition,
shareholders of the acquiring corporation who under section 1701.83 of the
Revised Code are entitled to vote on such transaction, but only as to the
shares so entitling them to vote;
(E) Shareholders of a domestic subsidiary corporation into which one
or more domestic or foreign corporations are being merged pursuant to
section 1701.801 of the Revised Code.
1701.85 QUALIFICATIONS OF AND PROCEDURES FOR DISSENTING SHAREHOLDERS
(A) (1) A shareholder of a domestic corporation is entitled to relief as a
dissenting shareholder in respect of the proposals described in sections
1701.74, 1701.76, and 1701.84 of the Revised Code, only in compliance with this
section.
(2) If the proposal must be submitted to the shareholders of the
corporation involved, the dissenting shareholder shall be a record holder of the
shares of the corporation as to which he seeks relief as of the date fixed for
the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of a meeting of the
shareholders at which the proposal is to be submitted, and such shares shall not
have been voted in favor of the proposal. Not later than ten days after the date
on which the vote on the proposal was taken at the meeting of the shareholders,
the dissenting shareholder shall deliver to the corporation a written demand for
payment to him of the fair cash value of the shares as to which he seeks relief,
which demand shall state his address, the number and class of such shares, and
the amount claimed by him as the fair cash value of the shares.
(3) The dissenting shareholder entitled to relief under division (C) of
section 1701.84 of the Revised Code in the case of a merger pursuant to section
1701.80 of the Revised Code and a dissenting shareholder entitled to relief
under division (E) of section 1701.84 of the Revised Code in the case of a
merger pursuant to section 1701.801 of the Revised Code shall be a record holder
of the shares of the corporation as to which he seeks relief as of the date on
which the agreement of merger was adopted by the directors of that corporation.
Within twenty days after he has been sent the notice provided in section 1701.80
or 1701.801 of the Revised Code, the dissenting shareholder shall deliver to the
corporation a written demand for payment with the same information as that
provided for in division (A)(2) of this section.
(4) In the case of a merger or consolidation, a demand served on the
constituent corporation involved constitutes service on the surviving or the new
entity, whether the demand is served before, on, or after the effective date of
the merger or consolidation.
(5) If the corporation sends to the dissenting shareholder, at the address
specified in his demand, a request for the certificates representing the shares
as to which he seeks relief, the dissenting shareholder, within fifteen days
from the date of the sending of such request, shall deliver to the corporation
the certificates requested so that the corporation may forthwith endorse on them
a legend to the effect that demand for the fair cash value of such shares has
been made. The corporation promptly shall return such endorsed certificates to
the dissenting shareholder. A dissenting shareholder's failure to deliver such
certificates terminates his rights as a dissenting
1
shareholder, at the option of the corporation, exercised by written notice sent
to the dissenting shareholder within twenty days after the lapse of the
fifteen-day period, unless a court for good cause shown otherwise directs. If
shares represented by a certificate on which such a legend has been endorsed are
transferred, each new certificate issued for them shall bear a similar legend,
together with the name of the original dissenting holder of such shares. Upon
receiving a demand for payment from a dissenting shareholder who is the record
holder of uncertificated securities, the corporation shall make an appropriate
notation of the demand for payment in its shareholder records. If uncertificated
shares for which payment has been demanded are to be transferred, any new
certificate issued for the shares shall bear the legend required for
certificated securities as provided in this paragraph. A transferee of the
shares so endorsed, or of uncertificated securities where such notation has been
made, acquires only such rights in the corporation as the original dissenting
holder of such shares had immediately after the service of a demand for payment
of the fair cash value of the shares. A request under this paragraph by the
corporation is not an admission by the corporation that the shareholder is
entitled to relief under this section.
(B) Unless the corporation and the dissenting shareholder have come to an
agreement on the fair cash value per share of the shares as to which the
dissenting shareholder seeks relief, the dissenting shareholder or the
corporation, which in case of a merger or consolidation may be the surviving or
new entity, within three months after the service of the demand by the
dissenting shareholder, may file a complaint in the court of common pleas of the
county in which the principal office of the corporation that issued the shares
is located or was located when the proposal was adopted by the shareholders of
the corporation, or, if the proposal was not required to be submitted to the
shareholders, was approved by the directors. Other dissenting shareholders,
within that three-month period, may join as plaintiffs or may be joined as
defendants in any such proceeding, and any two or more such proceedings may be
consolidated. The complaint shall contain a brief statement of the facts,
including the vote and the facts entitling the dissenting shareholder to the
relief demanded. No answer to such a complaint is required. Upon the filing of
such a complaint, the court, on motion of the petitioner, shall enter an order
fixing a date for a hearing on the complaint and requiring that a copy of the
complaint and a notice of the filing and of the date for hearing be given to the
respondent or defendant in the manner in which summons is required to be served
or substituted service is required to be made in other cases. On the day fixed
for the hearing on the complaint or any adjournment of it, the court shall
determine from the complaint and from such evidence as is submitted by either
party whether the dissenting shareholder is entitled to be paid the fair cash
value of any shares and, if so, the number and class of such shares. If the
court finds that the dissenting shareholder is so entitled, the court may
appoint one or more persons as appraisers to receive evidence and to recommend a
decision on the amount of the fair cash value. The appraisers have such power
and authority as is specified in the order of their appointment. The court
thereupon shall make a finding as to the fair cash value of a share and shall
render judgment against the corporation for the payment of it, with interest at
such rate and from such date as the court considers equitable. The costs of the
proceeding, including reasonable compensation to the appraisers to be fixed by
the court, shall be assessed or apportioned as the court considers equitable.
The proceeding is a special proceeding and final orders in it may be vacated,
modified, or reversed on appeal pursuant to the Rules of Appellate Procedure
and, to the extent not in conflict with those rules, Chapter 2505 of the Revised
Code. If, during the pendency of any proceeding instituted under this section, a
suit or proceeding is or has been instituted to enjoin or otherwise to prevent
the carrying out of the action as to which the shareholder has dissented, the
proceeding instituted under this section shall be stayed until the final
determination of the other suit or proceeding. Unless any provision in division
(D) of this section is applicable, the fair cash value of the shares that is
agreed upon by the parties or fixed under this section shall be paid within
thirty days after the date of final determination of such value under this
division, the effective date of the amendment to the articles, or the
consummation of the other action involved, whichever occurs last. Upon the
occurrence of the last such event, payment shall be made immediately to a holder
of uncertificated securities entitled to such payment. In the case of holders of
shares represented by certificates, payment shall be made only upon and
simultaneously with the surrender to the corporation of the certificates
representing the shares for which the payment is made.
(C) If the proposal was required to be submitted to the shareholders of the
corporation, fair cash value as to those shareholders shall be determined as of
the day prior to the day on which the vote by the shareholders was taken and, in
the case of a merger pursuant to section 1701.80 or 1701.801 of the Revised
Code, fair cash value as to shareholders of a constituent subsidiary corporation
shall be determined as of the day before the adoption of the agreement of merger
by the directors of the particular subsidiary corporation. The fair cash value
of a share for the purposes of this section is the amount that a willing seller
who is under no compulsion to sell would be willing to accept and that a willing
buyer who is under no compulsion to purchase would be willing to pay, but in
2
no event shall the fair cash value of a share exceed the amount specified in the
demand of the particular shareholder. In computing such fair cash value, any
appreciation or depreciation in market value resulting from the proposal
submitted to the directors or to the shareholders shall be excluded.
(D) (1) The right and obligation of a dissenting shareholder to receive
such fair cash value and to sell such shares as to which he seeks relief, and
the right and obligation of the corporation to purchase such shares and to pay
the fair cash value of them terminates if any of the following applies:
(a) The dissenting shareholder has not complied with this section,
unless the corporation by its directors waives such failure;
(b) The corporation abandons the action involved or is finally
enjoined or prevented from carrying it out, or the shareholders rescind
their adoption of the action involved;
(c) The dissenting shareholder withdraws his demand, with the consent
of the corporation by its directors;
(d) The corporation and the dissenting shareholder have not come to an
agreement as to the fair cash value per share, and neither the shareholder
nor the corporation has filed or joined in a complaint under division (B)
of this section within the period provided in that division.
(2) For purposes of division (D)(1) of this section, if the merger or
consolidation has become effective and the surviving or new entity is not a
corporation, action required to be taken by the directors of the corporation
shall be taken by the general partners of a surviving or new partnership or the
comparable representatives of any other surviving or new entity.
(E) From the time of the dissenting shareholder's giving of the demand
until either the termination of the rights and obligations arising from it or
the purchase of the shares by the corporation, all other rights accruing from
such shares, including voting and dividend or distribution rights, are
suspended. If during the suspension, any dividend or distribution is paid in
money upon shares of such class or any dividend, distribution, or interest is
paid in money upon any securities issued in extinguishment of or in substitution
for such shares, an amount equal to the dividend, distribution, or interest
which, except for the suspension, would have been payable upon such shares or
securities, shall be paid to the holder of record as a credit upon the fair cash
value of the shares. If the right to receive fair cash value is terminated other
than by the purchase of the shares by the corporation, all rights of the holder
shall be restored and all distributions which, except for the suspension, would
have been made shall be made to the holder of record of the shares at the time
of termination.
3
ANNEX D
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-19431
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
OHIO 34-1350353
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification)
7005 COCHRAN ROAD, GLENWILLOW, OHIO 44139
(Address of principal executive offices) Zip Code
(440) 996-2000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
COMMON SHARES, WITHOUT PAR VALUE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
(Title of Each Class) (Name of Each Exchange on which Registered)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:
NONE
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate, by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K (Sec. 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of the voting shares held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, based upon the
closing sale price of Registrant's Common Shares on March 11, 2002, was
$44,639,303. Common Shares held by each officer and director have been excluded
in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of
affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other
purposes.
The number of outstanding shares of the Registrant's common shares as of
March 11, 2002, was 13,017,352.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Applicable portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on Thursday, April 25, 2002, are incorporated by
reference in Part III of this form.
The Exhibit index appears on sequential page 36.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. ("Royal" or the "Company"), an Ohio corporation
with its corporate offices in the Cleveland, Ohio metropolitan area, develops,
assembles or sources and markets a full line of cleaning products for home and
some for commercial use, primarily in North America under the Dirt Devil(R) and
Royal(R) brand names. In 1984, the Company introduced the first in a line of
Dirt Devil floorcare products, which the Company believes has become one of the
largest selling lines of vacuum cleaners in the United States. The Company has
used the Dirt Devil brand name recognition to gain acceptance for other Dirt
Devil floorcare products. The Company continues to market certain metal vacuum
cleaners for home and commercial use under the Royal brand name.
During 2001, the Company's subsidiary, Privacy Technologies, Inc. ("Privacy
Technologies(TM)") introduced the TeleZapper(TM) -- a telephone attachment that
helps block unwanted telemarketing calls and removes consumers' phone numbers
from the telemarketers' computerized dialing lists.
The Company has also created Product Launch Partners, Inc. Product Launch
Partners, Inc. was established as a vehicle for inventors and start-up consumer
product companies to joint venture with the Company on new product launch
opportunities.
The Company's business strategy is primarily focused on leveraging its
distribution channels and its well-known Dirt Devil brand, where applicable, to
new and innovative products both inside and outside the floorcare industry,
primarily in North America. The Company's product offering consists of name
brand consumer products in two business segments: Consumer Products -- Floorcare
and Consumer Products -- Other. The Company's goal is to expand the number,
visibility and volume of its products sold by retailers, as well as to increase
the number of major retailers carrying its products. The Company also seeks to
increase the sale of its products through independent floorcare dealers by
offering dealer-exclusive product lines and cooperative promotional programs.
The Company's marketing strategy is essential to its success. The Company
uses television, print, cooperative advertising and its Dirt Devil and Privacy
Technologies websites to build and maintain brand awareness and consumer demand,
as well as to gain shelf space for its product lines from major retailers.
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
CONSUMER PRODUCTS -- FLOORCARE:
The Company's Consumer Products -- Floorcare business segment designs,
assembles or sources, markets and distributes a full line of plastic and metal
vacuum cleaners. The Company's Dirt Devil vacuum cleaners are intended for home
use. The Company's metal vacuum cleaners are intended for home and commercial
use.
This business segment's primary retail product lines are sold under the
Dirt Devil name. The first Dirt Devil product, the Hand Vac, was introduced in
1984. The Dirt Devil line has since been expanded to include a full line of
upright vacuum cleaners at various price points, both with bags and bagless,
upright and hand held carpet and upholstery extractors, canister vacuum
cleaners, and a full line of corded and cordless hand held vacuum cleaners.
During 2001, the Dirt Devil line of products was further expanded with the
introduction of Dirt Devil(R) Platinum Force(TM), a family of floorcare products
that offer unique features at premium retail price points.
The Company has produced durable metal vacuum cleaners since the early
1900's. Currently, the Company markets a full line of metal upright and canister
vacuum cleaners under the Royal brand name for home and commercial use
exclusively through its network of independent dealers. The Company also sells
accessories, carpet and upholstery cleaning solutions, attachments, refurbished
cleaners and replacement parts for each of its product lines.
In order to provide the retailers with distinct product alternatives, the
Company offers different Dirt Devil products in a variety of styles and colors
and with various features. Major retailers currently carrying some portion of
the Dirt Devil product line include Best Buy, Canadian Tire, Kmart, Sam's Club,
Sears, Lowe's,
1
Target, and Wal*Mart. The Company also sells its Dirt Devil products through
independent dealers, who primarily sell the metal line of Royal vacuum cleaners.
CONSUMER PRODUCTS -- OTHER:
The Company's Consumer Products -- Other segment primarily represents
business conducted by Privacy Technologies, Inc. and Product Launch Partners,
Inc. This business segment designs, sources and distributes consumer products
outside of the Company's traditional floorcare business. Currently, this segment
is substantially comprised of the TeleZapper, which was introduced in the second
half 2001 by Privacy Technologies, Inc. The TeleZapper is a telephone attachment
that helps block unwanted telemarketing calls and removes consumers' phone
numbers from telemarketers' computerized dialing lists. Major retailers
currently offering the TeleZapper include Best Buy, Canadian Tire, Kmart,
RadioShack, Target and Wal*Mart. In order to optimize the value of the
TeleZapper product line, the Company is exploring the possibility of licensing
the TeleZapper intellectual property or an outright sale of the entire
TeleZapper business.
NET SALES BY BUSINESS SEGMENT:
The following table sets forth the amounts and percentages of the Company's
net sales for the three years ended December 31, 2001 for the Company's two
business segments.
2001 % 2000 % 1999 %
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Consumer Products --
Floorcare.................... $406,502 94.8% $408,223 100.0% $407,984 100.0%
Consumer Products --
Other........................ 21,923 5.2% -- -- -- --
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
$428,425 100.0% $408,223 100.0% $407,984 100.0%
======== ===== ======== ===== ======== =====
For further information on business segments, see Note 13 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
NEW PRODUCTS
The Company introduces new products and enhances its existing products on a
regular basis for both the retail and dealer markets. In order to support its
product development efforts, the Company engages in research and development
activities, particularly with respect to new product engineering. The Company's
engineering and product development expenditures were approximately $7.9
million, $6.8 million, and $6.3 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
The Company has recently formed licensing and R&D partnerships, including
one with The Procter & Gamble Company to launch, in the second half of 2002, a
new product to clean carpets more effectively. Additionally, the Company has
licensing agreements with third parties, that license the Dirt Devil brand name
for certain other cleaning products in North America and for use of the Dirt
Devil brand name in other countries.
In addition to internally developing products, the Company may purchase
product tooling, license product designs and patents, and outsource certain
product assembly for products to be marketed under the Dirt Devil and Royal
brand names or through Privacy Technologies.
MARKETING AND CUSTOMERS
The Company markets its Dirt Devil and TeleZapper products primarily
through major retailers, including mass market retailers (e.g. Wal*Mart, Target
and Kmart), electronic chains (e.g. Best Buy and RadioShack), warehouse clubs
(e.g. Sam's Club), home improvement centers (e.g. Lowe's), regional chains and
department stores (e.g. Ames). During 2001, Wal*Mart (including Sam's Club),
Kmart and Target accounted for approximately 31.1%, 14.3%, and 14.1%
respectively, of the Company's net sales, compared to approximately 32.6%,
13.5%, and 13.1%, respectively, of the Company's net sales in 2000. These were
the only customers who accounted for 10% or more of the Company's net sales
during such periods. During 2001 and 2000, the Company's net sales in the
aggregate to its five largest customers were 68.1% and 66.1%, respectively, of
its total net sales. The loss of any of these customers or loss of their shelf
space could have a significant impact on the Company's operations. The Company
anticipates that the significant percentage of the Company's net sales
attributable to a limited number of major retail customers will continue. The
Company believes that its relations with its customers are good. The Company
sells most of its products to retailers through its internal sales staff.
2
Recently, several major retailers have experienced significant financial
difficulties and some, including Kmart, have filed for protection from creditors
under applicable bankruptcy laws. As of December 31, 2001, the net exposure
related to Kmart as well as other customer balances for which management
believes collection is doubtful was included in the calculation of allowance for
doubtful accounts. The Company sells its products to certain customers that are
in bankruptcy proceedings.
Since Dirt Devil and TeleZapper products are targeted to sell to the mass
market, the Company believes that brand name recognition is critical to the
success of these products. The Company provides advertising and promotional
support for its Dirt Devil and TeleZapper products through television and
cooperative advertising with retailers and believes that these promotional
activities, as well as those of its major customers, affect brand name awareness
and sales. The Company's cooperative advertising program is established based
upon planning with its mass market retail customers. Some of the Company's
advertising and promotional activities are tied to holidays and also to specific
promotional activities of retailers, and historically have been higher during
the Christmas shopping season. The Company's advertising and promotional
expenditures are not proportional to anticipated sales. In addition, the Company
has generated a small portion of its sales from consumer direct orders,
primarily for accessories and new product launches, through the Company's
toll-free number, websites and from direct response television infomercials.
The Company devotes considerable attention to the design and appearance of
its products and their packaging in order to enhance their appeal to consumers
and to stand out among other brands on retailers' shelves. In order to increase
the presence of its Dirt Devil products in major retail outlets, the Company
provides retailers with distinct product alternatives by offering its Dirt Devil
product lines in a variety of styles and colors and with various features.
The Company also strives to meet the logistic and product merchandising
needs of its retailers. The Company endeavors to have sufficient quantities of
products in stock in order to process and fill orders in a timely manner. Since
orders are typically shipped within 10 days of the receipt of a purchase order,
the Company does not have a significant order backlog. The Company permits
cancellation of orders up to 72 hours prior to shipment.
The Company's line of metal vacuum cleaners is sold exclusively through a
network of independent vacuum cleaner dealers. As part of its effort to support
its independent dealer network, the Company has attempted to meet independent
dealers' needs for distinctive product offerings not available to mass
merchants. The Company's metal product lines are targeted at consumers and
commercial customers who are interested in purchasing more durable and higher
quality vacuum cleaners. The Company focuses its promotional activities with its
independent dealers on cooperative advertising.
Many of the Company's independent dealers also provide warranty service for
Royal and Dirt Devil products. This allows the consumer to have prompt access to
local service outlets and is an important component of the Company's efforts to
be responsive to consumers. The Company's products are generally sold with a one
to six-year limited warranty.
The Company has generally accepted over-the-counter product returns from
its retail customers reflecting the retailers' customer return policies.
Each of the Company's products has a toll-free number printed on it that
consumers may use to contact a Company customer service representative. Through
its customer service computer system, the Company can provide a prompt response
to consumer inquiries concerning the availability of its products and service
dealers in the consumer's vicinity.
COMPETITION
The Company's Consumer Products -- Floorcare business segment's most
significant competitors are Hoover, Eureka and Bissell in the upright vacuum and
carpet shampooer markets and, Black & Decker and Euro Pro in the hand-held
market. Many of these competitors and several others are subsidiaries or
divisions of companies that are more diversified and have greater financial
resources than the Company. The Company believes that the domestic vacuum
cleaner industry is a mature industry with modest annual growth in many of its
products but with a decline in certain other products. Competition is dependent
upon price, quality, extension of product lines, and advertising and promotion
expenditures. Additionally, competition is influenced by innovation in the
design of replacement models and by marketing and approaches to distribution.
The Company experiences
3
extensive competition, including price pressure and increased advertising by its
competitors, in all product lines within the Consumer Products -- Floorcare
segment. These trends are expected to continue into 2002.
TRADEMARKS AND PATENTS
The Company holds numerous trademarks registered in the United States and
foreign countries for various products. The Company has registered trademarks in
the United States and a number of foreign countries for the Dirt Devil, Royal,
TeleZapper, and other names and logos, which are used in connection with the
sale of its vacuum cleaners, consumer electronics and other products and
accessory parts. The Company considers both the Dirt Devil and TeleZapper
trademarks to be of considerable value and critical to its business. No
challenges to its rights to these trademarks have arisen and the Company has no
reason to believe that any such challenges will arise in the future.
The Company holds or licenses the use of numerous domestic and
international patents, including design patents and processes. The Company may
also license its trademarks and patents. The Company believes that its product
lines in the Consumer Products -- Floorcare segment are generally not dependent
upon any single patent or group of patents. Within the Consumer
Products -- Other segment, the primary product line, the TeleZapper, is
dependent upon a limited number of patents for that product.
SEASONALITY
The Company believes that a significant percentage of certain of its
products are given as gifts and therefore, sell in larger volumes during the
Christmas and other holiday shopping seasons. Because of the Company's continued
dependency on its major customers, the timing of purchases by these major
customers and the timing of new product introductions cause quarterly
fluctuations in the Company's net sales. As a consequence, results in prior
quarters are not necessarily indicative of future results of operations.
PRODUCTION
The Company currently assembles certain products in its facilities located
in the Cleveland, Ohio metropolitan area. The products that are not assembled in
Northeast Ohio have been outsourced to global third party contract
manufacturers. Unlike many of its competitors, the Company does not manufacture
component parts for its products. Component parts for the Company's products are
manufactured by suppliers, frequently using molds and tooling owned by the
Company and built to its specifications. Since the Company's production
operations are currently limited to final assembly, it believes that its fixed
costs are lower than many of its competitors. The Company also believes that
this lack of vertical integration and the use of third party contract
manufacturers has provided increased flexibility in the introduction and
modification of products.
The Company's engineering department is primarily responsible for the
design and testing of its products. The Company has computer-aided design
systems to assist its engineers in developing new products and modifying
existing products. The Company also retains outside design firms to assist its
engineers in designing new products. In addition to internally developing
products, the Company may purchase tooling, license intellectual property, or
otherwise sell products produced by others to the Company's specifications which
may be marketed under the Dirt Devil and Royal brand names or through Privacy
Technologies.
A majority of the raw materials purchased by the Company are component
parts, such as motors, bags, cords, and plastic parts, which are available from
multiple suppliers. The amount of time required by suppliers to fill orders
released by the Company varies from 1 to 3 months for sourced finished goods,
and days to several weeks for component parts. The Company does not believe that
it is dependent on any single source for any significant portion of its raw
material or component purchases. The Company believes that it has good
relationships with its suppliers and contract manufacturers and has not
experienced any significant raw material or component shortages.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2001, the Company employed approximately 670 full-time
employees. In addition, the Company generally utilizes temporary personnel
during the period when the Company is responding to its peak selling season.
During 2001, the peak temporary personnel level reached approximately 260. The
Company's
4
employees are not represented by any labor union. The Company considers its
relations with its employees to be good.
The Company also has in effect a severance compensation plan that provides
for a severance payment to full-time employees, based on years of employment, if
within thirty-six months after a change-in-control of the Company their
employment is terminated for any reason other than death, permanent disability,
voluntary retirement or for cause. Executives who receive payments pursuant to
change-in-control and other employment arrangements will not receive duplicative
severance payments under the severance compensation plan.
GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION
The Company's facilities are subject to numerous federal, state and local
laws and regulations designed to protect the environment from waste, emissions,
and from hazardous substances. The Company is also subject to the Federal
Occupational Safety and Health Act and other laws and regulations affecting the
safety and health of employees in its facilities. The Company is not a party to
any investigation or litigation by the Environmental Protection Agency or any
state environment agency. The Company believes that it is in compliance, in all
material respects, with applicable environmental and occupational safety
regulations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
On December 31, 2001, the Company and its subsidiaries owned or leased the
material properties listed on the following table:
APPROXIMATE
SQUARE FOOTAGE
----------------- LEASE EXPIRATIONS
LOCATION AND ADDRESS OWNED LEASED (EXCLUDING RENEWALS) FUNCTION
-------------------- ------- ------- -------------------- --------
7005 Cochran Road...... -- 458,000 07/15 Distribution Center &
Glenwillow, Ohio Corporate Headquarters
1340 East 289th 106,000 -- 11/11 Assembly and Refurb
Street............... Operations
Wickliffe, Ohio(1)
8120 Tyler Blvd........ 300,000 -- N/A Assembly, Shipping and
Mentor, Ohio Warehouse
1350 Rockefeller....... -- 147,000 05/02 Assembly
Wickliffe, Ohio(2)
3951 East Earlstone.... -- 140,400 06/06 Distribution Center
Ontario, California
---------------
(1) This leased property is reflected as owned because it contains a bargain
purchase option of $1. For further description, see Note 4 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2) The Company intends to vacate this facility at the end of the lease term and
transfer operations to the 8120 Tyler Blvd., Mentor, Ohio facility.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Hoover Company (Hoover) filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the
Northern District of Ohio (case #1:00cv 0347), against the Company on February
4, 2000, under the patent, trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United
States. The Complaint asserts that the Company's Dirt Devil Easy Steamer
infringes certain patents held by Hoover. Hoover seeks damages, injunction of
future production, and legal fees. The Company is vigorously defending the suit
and believes that it is without merit. If Hoover were to prevail on all of its
claims, it could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.
The Company filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the Northern District of
Ohio (case #1:01cv 2775), against The Hoover Company (Hoover) on December 10,
2001, under the patent, trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United
States. The Complaint asserts that Hoover infringes certain patents relating to
bagless technology held by the Company. The Company seeks damages, injunction on
future production, and legal fees.
The Company filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the Northern District of
Ohio (case #1:02cv 0338), against Bissell Homecare, Inc. (Bissell) in 2002,
under the patent, trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United
5
States. The Complaint asserts that Bissell infringes certain patents relating to
bagless technology held by the Company. The Company seeks damages, injunction on
future production, and legal fees.
Bissell Homecare, Inc. (Bissell) filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the
Western District of Michigan (case 1:02cv 0142), against the Company in 2002,
under the patent, trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United States.
The Complaint asserts that the Company's Dirt Devil Easy Steamer and Platinum
Force Extractor infringes certain patents held by Bissell. Bissell seeks
damages, injunction of future production, and legal fees. The Company is
vigorously defending the suit and believes that it is without merit. If Bissell
were to prevail on all of its claims, it could have a material adverse effect on
the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the
Company.
The Company is involved in various other claims and litigation arising in
the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate
resolution of these actions will not materially affect the consolidated
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Set forth below is certain information with respect to the named executive
officers of the Company.
NAME AGE POSITION AND OFFICES WITH THE COMPANY
---- --- -------------------------------------
Michael J. Merriman........................ 45 President and Chief Executive Officer
Richard C. Farone.......................... 38 Executive Vice President -- Sales,
Marketing & Engineering
Richard G. Vasek........................... 37 Chief Financial Officer, Vice
President -- Finance and Secretary
David M. Brickner.......................... 35 Vice President -- Operations
The following is a brief account of the business experience during the past
five years of each such executive officer:
Michael J. Merriman was appointed Chief Executive Officer and President in
1995 and Director in October 1993.
Richard C. Farone has been Executive Vice President -- Sales, Marketing &
Engineering since December 2000. Since 1987, he has served in several different
roles in the Company's marketing and new products areas, most recently as Vice
President -- Product Development.
Richard G. Vasek was appointed Chief Financial Officer and Vice
President -- Finance in September 1998, and Secretary in January 1996. From
February 1992 until his appointment as Chief Financial Officer and Vice
President -- Finance he served as the Company's Corporate Controller.
David M. Brickner has been Vice President -- Operations since 2001. Prior
to that, he was Vice President -- Manufacturing from December 1998 to 2001.
Since 1988, he has served in several different roles in the Company's
engineering, purchasing, and sourced products areas.
6
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE COMPANY'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's common shares are quoted on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) under the symbol "RAM". The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, the high and low sales price for the Company's Common Shares as
reported by the New York Stock Exchange.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------
2001 2000
------------- -------------
HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
----- ----- ----- -----
QUARTERS:
First................................................ $4.75 $3.85 $6.00 $4.37
Second............................................... $6.10 $3.15 $6.44 $4.62
Third................................................ $6.61 $3.57 $6.87 $4.94
Fourth............................................... $5.55 $4.00 $5.94 $3.44
The Company has not declared or paid any cash dividends and currently
intends not to pay any cash dividends in 2002. The Board of Directors intends to
retain earnings, if any, to support the operations, growth of the business and
to fund the stock repurchase program. The Company's current credit agreement
prohibits the payment of cash dividends and permits additional stock repurchases
up to $40 million, of which $23.0 million was utilized through December 31,
2001, in accordance with the stock repurchase programs (see Notes 3 and 11 of
the Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements).
On March 11, 2002, there were approximately 900 shareholders of record of
the Company's Common Shares, as reported by National City Corporation, the
Company's Registrar and Transfer Agent, which maintains its corporate offices at
National City Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-0756.
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data of the
Company. The selected Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated
Balance Sheet data for each of the five years during the period ended December
31, 2001, are derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the
Company. Prior
7
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2001 presentation. The
data presented below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated
Financial Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere herein.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS:
Net sales............................... $428,425 $408,223 $407,984 $282,720 $325,417
Cost of sales........................... 325,746 315,849 304,452 208,861 229,469
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gross margin.......................... 102,679 92,374 103,532 73,859 95,948
Selling, general and administrative
expenses.............................. 84,701 79,694 77,849 68,346 73,319
Charge for tooling obsolescence......... -- -- 2,621 -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income from operations................ 17,978 12,680 23,062 5,513 22,629
Interest expense, net................... 2,415 3,503 1,401 1,521 1,412
Receivable securitization and other
expense (income), net................. 1,181 1,713 1,369 (140) 1,033
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income before taxes................... 14,382 7,464 20,292 4,132 20,184
Income tax expense...................... 5,058 1,525 7,610 1,606 7,777
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income............................ $ 9,324 $ 5,939 $ 12,682 $ 2,526 $ 12,407
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding (in thousands)............ 13,731 15,083 18,155 21,368 23,553
Earnings per share...................... $ .68 $ .39 $ .70 $ .12 $ .53
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Weighted average number of common shares
and equivalents outstanding (in
thousands)............................ 14,297 15,574 18,371 21,562 23,944
Earnings per share...................... $ .65 $ .38 $ .69 $ .12 $ .52
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT END
OF PERIOD)
Working capital......................... $ 32,566 $ 39,885 $ 38,950 $ 30,240 $ 32,486
Total assets............................ 140,444 138,552 151,892 117,480 134,947
Long-term debt.......................... 33,978 48,537 34,704 18,426 13,672
Shareholders' equity.................... 38,622 31,053 44,669 46,723 60,219
8
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND
FINANCIAL CONDITION
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management's discussion and analysis of its financial position and results
of operations are based upon the Company's consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ
from those estimates. Management believes that the critical accounting policies
and areas that require the most significant judgments and estimates to be used
in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are revenue
recognition including customer based programs and incentives, allowance for
doubtful accounts, useful lives of tooling and other long lived assets and
accrued warranty and customer returns.
Revenue Recognition -- The Company's revenue recognition policy is to
recognize revenues when products are shipped. All sales are final upon shipment
of product to the customer. The Company records estimated reductions to net
sales for customer programs and incentive offerings including pricing
arrangements, promotions and other volume based incentives. If market conditions
were to soften, the Company may take actions to increase customer incentives,
possibly resulting in a reduction of net sales and gross margins at the time the
incentive is offered.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts -- The Company maintains an allowance for
trade accounts receivable for which collection on specific customer accounts is
doubtful. In determining collectibility, management reviews available customer
financial statement information, credit rating reports as well as other external
documents and public filings. When it is deemed probable that a specific
customer account is uncollectible, that balance is included in the reserve
calculation. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different
assumptions.
Useful Lives of Tooling -- The Company capitalizes the cost of tooling used
in the production of its products by third party suppliers and global contract
manufacturers. The tooling is depreciated on a straight-line basis over 2 - 4
years, based on the nature of the product and the estimated product life cycle.
The useful lives are reviewed on a quarterly basis by management and useful
lives may be shortened if needed. In determining whether or not shortening of
useful lives is required, management reviews retail sell-through data, forecast
demands and the timeframe of new product introductions.
Accrued Warranty and Customer Returns -- The Company's return policy is to
replace, repair or issue credit for product under warranty. Returns received
during the current period are expensed as received and a reserve is maintained
for future returns from current shipments. Management calculates the reserve
utilizing historical return rates by product family. These rates are reviewed
and adjusted periodically. Management utilizes judgment for estimating return
rates of new products and adjusts those estimates as actual results become
available.
The following table sets forth, for the years indicated, the percentages of
net sales of certain items in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the
percentage change in such items as compared to the indicated prior year.
YEAR TO YEAR
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, INCREASES (DECREASES)
------------------------ -----------------------------
2001 2000 1999 2001 VS. 2000 2000 VS. 1999
------ ------ ------ ------------- -------------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
Net sales..................................... 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 4.9% 0.1%
Cost of sales................................. 76.0 77.4 74.6 3.1 3.7
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Gross margin................................ 24.0 22.6 25.4 11.2 (10.8)
Selling, general and administrative
expenses.................................... 19.8 19.5 19.0 6.3 2.4
Charge for tooling obsolescence............... -- -- 0.7 -- N/M
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Income from operations...................... 4.2 3.1 5.7 41.8 (45.0)
Interest expense, net......................... 0.6 0.9 0.4 (31.1) 150.0
Receivable securitization and other expense
(income), net............................... 0.2 0.4 0.3 (31.1) 25.1
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Income before income taxes.................. 3.4% 1.8% 5.0% 92.3% (63.2)%
===== ===== ===== ===== =====
9
2001 VS. 2000
Net sales for 2001 were $428,425, an increase of 4.9% from 2000. The
increase in sales for 2001 was attributable to the shipments of the TeleZapper,
which was introduced during the third quarter of 2001. These sales increases
were partially offset by lower sales of certain product lines within the
Consumer Products -- Floorcare segment including Dirt Devil canisters and stick
vacuums. Overall sales to the top 5 customers for 2001 (all of which are major
retailers) accounted for approximately 68.1% of net sales as compared with
approximately 66.1% in 2000. The Company believes that its dependence on sales
to its largest customers will continue. Recently, several major retailers have
experienced significant financial difficulties and some, including Kmart, have
filed for protection from creditors under applicable bankruptcy laws. As of
December 31, 2001, the net exposure related to Kmart as well as other customer
balances for which management believes collection is doubtful was included in
the calculation of allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company sells its
products to certain customers that are in bankruptcy proceedings.
Gross margin, as a percent of net sales, increased from 22.6% for 2000 to
24.0% in 2001. The gross margin percentage was positively affected in 2001
primarily by shipments of the TeleZapper. The increase was partially offset by
competitive pressure resulting in lower selling prices and margins on various
floorcare products.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2001 were $84,701, an
increase of 6.3% from 2000. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased as a percentage of net sales from 19.5% in 2000 to 19.8% in 2001. The
dollar increase is primarily attributable to employee compensation and related
benefits, higher professional fees associated with litigation (see Note 5 of the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements), bad debt expense primarily
associated with the bankruptcy filing by Kmart, and expenses associated with
upgrades to the Company's information technology systems.
Interest expense for 2001 was $2,415, a decrease of 31.1% from 2000. The
decrease in interest expense resulted from a lower effective borrowing rate
combined with lower levels of variable rate borrowings to finance working
capital, share repurchases, and capital expenditures.
Receivable securitization and other expense (income), net principally
reflects the cost of the Company's trade accounts receivable securitization
program and foreign currency transaction gains or losses related to the
Company's North American assets. The decrease during 2001 was due to lower
receivable securitization expense associated with a lower effective borrowing
rate and reduced foreign currency transaction losses on Canadian sales activity.
Due to the factors discussed above, the Company had income before income
taxes for 2001 of $14,382 as compared to income before income taxes for 2000 of
$7,464. The components of the Company's effective income tax expense rate of
35.2% are described in Note 6 of the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements.
2000 VS. 1999
Net sales for 2000 were $408,223, an increase of 0.1% from 1999. Increased
unit and dollar volume shipments of the Dirt Devil Easy Steamer(TM) (which was
introduced in mid 1999) and the Dirt Devil Spot Scrubber(TM) (which was
introduced in mid 2000) offset lower sales of certain other product lines
including the Company's line of upright vacuums and the Dirt Devil Broom
Vac(TM). Overall sales to the top 5 customers for 2000 (all of which are major
retailers) accounted for approximately 66.1% of net sales as compared with
approximately 67.1% in 1999.
Gross margin, as a percent of net sales, decreased from 25.4% for 1999 to
22.6% in 2000. The gross margin percentage was negatively affected in 2000
primarily by heightened competition resulting in lower margins on various
products, higher depreciation expense on tooling for certain product lines due
to shortened expected useful lives and inventory obsolescence charges related
primarily to the discontinued corded Mop Vac product.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2000 were $79,694, an
increase of 2.4% from 1999. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased as a percentage of net sales from 19.0% in 1999 to 19.5% in 2000. The
dollar increase is primarily due to increases in employee related benefit
expenses, professional services associated with litigation and increased
engineering and product development expenses associated with new product
introductions.
Interest expense for 2000 was $3,503, an increase of 150.0% from 1999. The
increase in interest expense resulted primarily from a higher effective
borrowing rate combined with higher levels of variable rate borrowings
10
to finance working capital, capital expenditures, the balloon payment made on
fixed rate debt on one of the Company's facilities and share repurchases.
Receivable securitization and other expense (income), net principally
reflects the cost of the Company's trade accounts receivable securitization
program and foreign currency transaction gains or losses related to the
Company's North American assets. The increase during 2000 was due to higher
receivable securitization expense associated with a higher effective borrowing
rate and foreign currency transaction losses on Canadian sales activity.
Due to the factors discussed above, the Company had income before income
taxes for 2000 of $7,464, as compared to income before income taxes for 1999 of
$20,292. The components of the Company's effective income tax expense rate of
20.4% are described in Note 6 of the Company's Consolidated Financial
Statements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company has used cash generated from operations to fund its working
capital needs, capital expenditures and share repurchases. Working capital was
$32,566 at December 31, 2001, a decrease of 18.3% over the December 31, 2000
level. Current assets increased by $1,820 reflecting in part a $5,337 increase
of inventories partially offset by a $6,111 decrease of trade accounts
receivable. Current liabilities increased by $9,139 reflecting a $5,224 increase
in trade accounts payable, $3,903 increase of accrued salaries, benefits, and
payroll taxes, a $1,370 increase of accrued income taxes, partially offset by a
$1,907 decrease of accrued advertising and promotion.
In 2001, the Company utilized $13,842 of cash for capital expenditures,
including approximately $4,600 for tooling related to the new Dirt Devil
Platinum Force line of products which includes a bagless upright, full size
extractor, corded hand vac, bagged upright and bagless stick vac and
approximately $4,800 for computer equipment and software and consulting
services, primarily related to the Oracle ERP implementation and other
information technology upgrades.
At December 31, 2001, the Company had a reducing collateralized revolving
credit facility with availability of up to $72,000 and a maturity date of March
7, 2003. Under the agreement, pricing options of the bank's base lending rate
and LIBOR rate are based on a formula, as defined. In addition, the Company pays
a commitment fee based on a formula, as defined, on the unused portion of the
facility. The revolving credit facility contains covenants which require, among
other things, the achievement of minimum net worth levels and the maintenance of
certain financial ratios. The Company was in compliance with all applicable
covenants as of December 31, 2001. The revolving credit facility is
collateralized by the assets of the Company and prohibits the payment of cash
dividends. As long as the Company remains in compliance with all covenants, the
revolving credit facility permits additional share repurchases up to $40,000, of
which $22,952 was utilized through December 31, 2001. The Company's effective
interest rate was 7.34% and 9.28% for 2001 and 2000, respectively.
The Company also utilizes a revolving trade accounts receivable
securitization program to sell without recourse, through a wholly-owned
subsidiary, certain trade accounts receivable. Under the program, the maximum
amount allowed to be sold at any given time through December 31, 2001, was
$35,000. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, the Company had received approximately
$24,700 and $19,200, respectively, from the sale of trade accounts receivable
that has not yet been collected. The proceeds from the sales were used to reduce
borrowings under the Company's revolving credit facility. Costs of the program,
which primarily consist of the purchaser's financing cost of issuing commercial
paper backed by the receivables, totaled $993, $1,559, and $1,281 in 2001, 2000
and 1999, respectively, and have been classified as Receivable securitization
and other expense (income), net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The Company's effective borrowing rate under this program was 5.42%,
7.56% and 6.51% for 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. The Company, as agent
for the purchaser of the receivables, retains collection and administrative
responsibilities for the purchased receivables. Additionally, the program
contains covenants which the Company was in compliance with as of December 31,
2001.
In February 2000, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a common
share repurchase program that enabled the Company to purchase, in the open
market and through negotiated transactions, up to an additional 4,250 of its
outstanding common shares. The Company completed the program repurchasing 3,289
shares for an aggregate purchase price of $20,065 in February 2001. In April
2001, the Company's Board of Directors authorized another common share
repurchase program that enables the Company to purchase, in the open market
11
and through negotiated transactions, up to an additional 3,400 of its
outstanding common shares. As of March 11, 2002, the Company has repurchased
approximately 1,052 for an aggregate purchase price of $5,250 under the program
that expires in December 2002.
The following tables present total contractual obligations and other
commercial commitments of the Company as of December 31, 2001:
PAYMENTS DUE BY YEAR
-------------------------------------------
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS TOTAL 2002 2003-2006 THEREAFTER
----------------------- ------- ------ --------- ----------
Long-Term Debt -- Revolver.......................... $32,000 $ -- $32,000(a) $ --
Capital Lease Obligations........................... 3,061 235 1,264 1,562
Operating Leases.................................... 26,640 3,419 9,783 13,438
------- ------ ------- -------
Total Contractual Cash Obligations.................. $61,701 $3,654 $43,047 $15,000
======= ====== ======= =======
AMOUNT OF COMMITMENT EXPIRATION PER YEAR
-----------------------------------------------
TOTAL AMOUNTS
OTHER COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS COMMITTED 2002 2003-2006 THEREAFTER
---------------------------- ------------- ------ --------- ----------
Standby Letters of Credit.......................... $1,562 $1,250 $-- $312
Other Commercial Commitments....................... 7,300 7,300 -- --
------ ------ -- ----
Total Commercial Commitments....................... $8,862 $8,550 $-- $312
====== ====== == ====
---------------
(a) The existing revolving credit facility has a maturity date of March 2003.
The Company is in negotiations with its bank group to renew and extend the
revolving line of credit for a three year period beginning April 1, 2002.
The Company believes that cash generated by operations along with its
revolving credit facilities will be sufficient to provide for the Company's
anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the next
twelve months, as well as additional stock repurchases, if any.
QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
The following table presents certain unaudited consolidated quarterly
operating information for the Company and includes all adjustments that the
Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of such information for the
interim periods.
THREE MONTHS ENDED
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEC. 31, SEPT. 30, JUNE 30, MARCH 31, DEC. 31, SEPT. 30, JUNE 30, MARCH 31,
2001 2001 2001 2001 2000 2000 2000 2000
-------- --------- -------- --------- -------- --------- -------- ---------
Net sales.................... $130,730 $112,726 $80,447 $104,522 $126,549 $96,129 $82,075 $103,470
Gross margin................. 36,157 27,684 16,204 22,634 31,690 21,778 15,451 23,455
Net income (loss)............ 3,773 4,085 (708) 2,174 3,018 3,345 (1,504) 1,080
Net income (loss) per
share -- diluted(a)........ $ 0.27 $ 0.29 $ (0.05) $ 0.15 $ 0.21 $ 0.22 $ (0.10) $ 0.06
---------------
(a) The sum of 2001 and 2000 quarterly net income (loss) per common share does
not equal annual net income per common share due to the change in the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding due to share
repurchases.
The Company believes that a significant percentage of certain of its
products are given as gifts and therefore sell in larger volumes during the
Christmas and other holiday shopping seasons. Because of the Company's continued
dependency on its major customers, the timing of purchases by these major
customers and the timing of new product introductions causes quarterly
fluctuations in the Company's net sales. As a consequence, results in prior
quarters are not necessarily indicative of future results of operations.
OTHER
The Company's Consumer Products -- Floorcare segment's most significant
competitors are Hoover, Eureka and Bissell in the upright vacuum and carpet
shampooer markets and, Black & Decker and Euro Pro in
12
the hand-held market. Most of these competitors and several others are
subsidiaries or divisions of companies that are more diversified and have
greater financial resources than the Company. The Company believes that the
domestic vacuum cleaner industry is a mature industry with modest annual growth
in many of its products but with a decline in certain other products.
Competition is dependent upon price, quality, extension of product lines, and
advertising and promotion expenditures. Additionally, competition is influenced
by innovation in the design of replacement models and by marketing and
approaches to distribution. The Company experiences extensive competition,
including price pressure and increased advertising by its competitors, in all
product lines within the Consumer Products-Floorcare segment. These trends are
expected to continue into 2002.
INFLATION
The Company does not believe that inflation by itself has had a material
effect on the Company's results of operations. However, as the Company
experiences price increases from its suppliers, which may include increases due
to inflation, retail pressures may prevent the Company from increasing its
prices.
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
The Company implemented Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
in the first quarter of 2001. The implementation of SFAS No. 133 did not have a
material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations,
or cash flows.
The Company is required to implement the following new accounting
pronouncements during the first quarter of 2002:
SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" -- This statement requires that all
business combinations be accounted for under a single method, the purchase
method. Use of the pooling-of-interests method is no longer permitted.
SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" -- This statement
addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other
intangible assets, and in summary discontinues the amortization of goodwill and
other intangibles with indefinite lives.
SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" -- This
statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations
associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated
asset retirement costs.
SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets" -- This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for the
impairment or disposal of long-lived assets.
The Company expects that the implementation of the above standards will not
have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Forward-looking statements in this release are made pursuant to the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such
forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements
which speak only as of the date hereof. Potential risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to: the financial strength of the retail industry
particularly in the major mass retail channel; the impact of Kmart's recent
bankruptcy filing on Royal's future sales and earnings; the competitive pricing
and aggressive product development environment within the floorcare industry;
the impact of private-label programs by mass retailers; the cost and
effectiveness of planned advertising, marketing and promotional campaigns; the
success at retail and the continued acceptance by consumers of the Company's new
products, including the Company's bagless uprights, carpet shampooers, and its
first consumer electronics product, the TeleZapper(TM), the dependence upon the
Company's ability to continue to successfully develop and introduce innovative
products; the uncertainty of the Company's global suppliers to continuously
supply sourced finished goods and component parts; and general business and
economic conditions
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company sells a small portion of its products in various global
markets. As a result, the Company's cash flow and earnings are exposed to
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relating to receipts from
customers and payments to service providers in foreign currencies. As a general
policy, the Company has hedged
13
certain foreign currency commitments of future payments and receipts by
purchasing foreign currency-forward contracts. As of December 31, 2001, there
were no such contracts outstanding. The majority of the Company's receipts and
expenditures are contracted in U.S. dollars, and the Company does not consider
the market risk exposure relating to currency exchange to be material at this
time.
14
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash
flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Royal
Appliance Mfg. Co. and its Subsidiaries (the "Company") at December 31, 2001 and
2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
February 11, 2002
15
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
2001 2000
------------ ------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash...................................................... $ 3,421 $ 704
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $3,000 and $1,300 at December 31, 2001 and
2000, respectively...................................... 35,986 42,097
Inventories............................................... 50,807 45,470
Refundable and deferred income taxes...................... 4,549 4,735
Prepaid expenses and other................................ 1,636 1,573
-------- --------
Total current assets............................... 96,399 94,579
-------- --------
Property, plant and equipment, at cost:
Land...................................................... 1,541 1,541
Buildings................................................. 7,777 7,777
Molds, tooling, and equipment............................. 52,031 48,650
Furniture, office and computer equipment, and software.... 12,154 12,721
Assets under capital leases............................... 3,171 3,171
Leasehold improvements and other.......................... 7,456 5,067
-------- --------
84,130 78,927
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization..... (46,556) (37,119)
-------- --------
37,574 41,808
-------- --------
Computer software and tooling deposits...................... 4,405 807
Other....................................................... 2,066 1,358
-------- --------
Total assets....................................... $140,444 $138,552
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Trade accounts payable.................................... $ 27,433 $ 22,209
Accrued liabilities:
Advertising and promotion............................... 11,196 13,103
Salaries, benefits, and payroll taxes................... 7,258 3,355
Warranty and customer returns........................... 9,950 9,800
Income taxes............................................ 1,370 --
Other................................................... 6,479 6,091
Current portions of capital lease obligations and notes
payable................................................. 147 136
-------- --------
Total current liabilities.......................... 63,833 54,694
-------- --------
Revolving credit agreement................................ 32,000 46,400
Capitalized lease obligations, less current portion....... 1,978 2,137
-------- --------
Total long-term debt............................... 33,978 48,537
-------- --------
Deferred income taxes..................................... 4,011 4,268
-------- --------
Total liabilities.................................. 101,822 107,499
-------- --------
Commitments and contingencies (Note 4 and 5).............. -- --
Shareholders' equity:
Serial preferred shares; authorized -- 1,000,000 shares;
none issued and outstanding............................. -- --
Common shares, at stated value; authorized -- 101,000,000
shares; issued 25,829,452 and 25,509,152 at December 31,
2001 and 2000, respectively............................. 214 212
Additional paid-in capital................................ 44,167 43,038
Retained earnings......................................... 70,489 61,165
-------- --------
114,870 104,415
Less treasury shares, at cost (12,365,700 and 11,780,500
shares at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively)..... (76,248) (73,362)
-------- --------
Total shareholders' equity......................... 38,622 31,053
-------- --------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity......... $140,444 $138,552
======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
16
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS,
EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
Net sales................................................... $428,425 $408,223 $407,984
Cost of sales............................................... 325,746 315,849 304,452
-------- -------- --------
Gross margin.............................................. 102,679 92,374 103,532
Selling, general and administrative expenses................ 84,701 79,694 77,849
Charge for tooling obsolescence............................. -- -- 2,621
-------- -------- --------
Income from operations.................................... 17,978 12,680 23,062
Interest expense, net....................................... 2,415 3,503 1,401
Receivable securitization and other expense (income), net... 1,181 1,713 1,369
-------- -------- --------
Income before income taxes.................................. 14,382 7,464 20,292
Income tax expense.......................................... 5,058 1,525 7,610
-------- -------- --------
Net income................................................ $ 9,324 $ 5,939 $ 12,682
======== ======== ========
BASIC
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (in
thousands)................................................ 13,731 15,083 18,155
Earnings per share.......................................... $ .68 $ .39 $ .70
DILUTED
Weighted average number of common shares and equivalents
outstanding (in thousands)................................ 14,297 15,574 18,371
Earnings per share.......................................... $ .65 $ .38 $ .69
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
17
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
COMMON SHARES ADDITIONAL TREASURY SHARES TOTAL
------------------- PAID-IN RETAINED --------------------- SHAREHOLDERS'
NUMBER AMOUNT CAPITAL EARNINGS NUMBER AMOUNT EQUITY
---------- ------ ---------- -------- ---------- -------- -------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1998... 25,347,924 $211 $42,115 $42,544 5,726,400 $(38,147) $ 46,723
Shares issued from stock
option plan................ 116,428 1 413 414
Purchase of treasury
shares..................... 2,764,600 (15,150) (15,150)
Net income................... 12,682 12,682
---------- ---- ------- ------- ---------- -------- --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 1999... 25,464,352 212 42,528 55,226 8,491,000 (53,297) 44,669
Compensatory effect of stock
options.................... 361 361
Shares issued from stock
option plan................ 44,800 149 149
Purchase of treasury
shares..................... 3,289,500 (20,065) (20,065)
Net income................... 5,939 5,939
---------- ---- ------- ------- ---------- -------- --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2000... 25,509,152 212 43,038 61,165 11,780,500 (73,362) 31,053
Compensatory effect of stock
options.................... 586 586
Shares issued from stock
option plan................ 320,300 2 543 545
Purchase of treasury
shares..................... 585,200 (2,886) (2,886)
Net income................... 9,324 9,324
---------- ---- ------- ------- ---------- -------- --------
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2001... 25,829,452 $214 $44,167 $70,489 12,365,700 $(76,248) $ 38,622
========== ==== ======= ======= ========== ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
18
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income................................................ $ 9,324 $ 5,939 $ 12,682
-------- -------- --------
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization.......................... 15,279 15,836 11,896
Charge for tooling obsolescence........................ -- -- 2,621
Compensatory effect of stock options................... 586 361 --
(Gain) loss on sale of property, plant and equipment,
net.................................................. -- (32) 85
Deferred income taxes.................................. (382) 618 (1,853)
(Increase) decrease in assets:
Trade accounts receivable, net......................... 6,111 6,429 (10,990)
Inventories, net....................................... (5,337) 4,991 (19,373)
Refundable and accrued income taxes.................... 1,681 (3,677) 1,436
Prepaid expenses and other............................. (63) 108 2,891
Other.................................................. (1,509) (1,147) (308)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Trade accounts payable................................. 5,224 (1,700) 2,745
Accrued advertising and promotion...................... (1,907) (2,829) 7,164
Accrued salaries, benefits, and payroll taxes.......... 3,903 (4,650) 5,706
Accrued warranty and customer returns.................. 150 (250) 1,950
Accrued other.......................................... 388 2,257 (3,508)
-------- -------- --------
Total adjustments................................. 24,124 16,315 462
-------- -------- --------
Net cash from operating activities................ 33,448 22,254 13,144
-------- -------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of tooling, property, plant, and equipment,
net.................................................... (10,244) (17,776) (16,474)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment....... -- 32 --
(Increase) decrease in computer software and tooling
deposits............................................... (3,598) 4,370 (2,407)
-------- -------- --------
Net cash from investing activities................ (13,842) (13,374) (18,881)
-------- -------- --------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
(Payments) proceeds on bank debt, net..................... (14,400) 15,829 22,488
Payments on notes payable................................. -- (5,186) (302)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options................... 545 149 414
Payments on capital lease obligations..................... (148) (330) (286)
Purchase of treasury shares............................... (2,886) (20,065) (15,150)
-------- -------- --------
Net cash from financing activities................ (16,889) (9,603) 7,164
-------- -------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash............................. 2,717 (723) 1,427
-------- -------- --------
Cash at beginning of year................................... 704 1,427 --
-------- -------- --------
Cash at end of year......................................... $ 3,421 $ 704 $ 1,427
======== ======== ========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash payments for:
Interest.................................................. $ 2,611 $ 3,818 $ 1,594
======== ======== ========
Income taxes, net of refunds.............................. $ 3,759 $ 4,574 $ 8,021
======== ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
19
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Description of Business -- Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. ("Royal" or the
"Company"), an Ohio corporation with its corporate offices in the Cleveland,
Ohio metropolitan area, develops, assembles or sources and markets a full line
of cleaning products for home and some for commercial use, primarily in North
America under the Dirt Devil and Royal brand names. In 1984, the Company
introduced the first in a line of Dirt Devil floorcare products, which the
Company believes has become one of the largest selling lines of vacuum cleaners
in the United States. The Company has used the Dirt Devil brand name recognition
to gain acceptance for other Dirt Devil floorcare products. The Company
continues to market certain metal vacuum cleaners for home and commercial use
under the Royal brand name.
During 2001, the Company's subsidiary, Privacy Technologies, Inc. ("Privacy
Technologies") introduced the TeleZapper -- a telephone attachment that helps
block unwanted telemarketing calls and removes consumers' phone numbers from the
telemarketers' computerized dialing lists.
The Company also created Product Launch Partners, Inc. Product Launch
Partners, Inc. was established as a vehicle for inventors and start-up consumer
product companies to joint venture with the Company on new product launch
opportunities.
The following is a summary of significant policies followed in the
preparation of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
Basis of Presentation -- The Consolidated Financial Statements include the
accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries after elimination of
all intercompany accounts and transactions. The companies are hereinafter
referred to as "Royal" or the "Company".
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and
related disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts, the reserve
for returns and allowances, and depreciation and amortization, among others.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2001
presentation.
Net income per common share is computed based on the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for basic earnings per share and on the
weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents
outstanding for diluted earnings per share.
The Company's revenue recognition policy is to recognize revenues when
products are shipped. The Company's return policy is to replace, repair or issue
credit for product under warranty. Returns received during the current period
are expensed as received and a provision is provided for future returns based on
current shipments. All sales are final upon shipment of goods to the customers.
The Company's revenue recognition policy is in accordance with Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements."
International operations, primarily Canadian, are conducted in their local
currency. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are
translated at current exchange rates, and income and expenses are translated
using weighted average exchange rates. The net effect of currency gains and
losses realized on these business transactions is included in the determination
of net income.
The Company has used forward exchange contracts to reduce fluctuations in
foreign currency cash flows related to receivables denominated in foreign
currencies. The terms of the currency instruments are consistent with the timing
of the transactions being hedged. The purpose of the Company's foreign currency
management activity is to protect the Company from the risk that the eventual
cash flows from the foreign currency denominated transactions may be adversely
affected by changes in exchange rates. Gains and losses on forward exchange
contracts are deferred and recognized in income when the related transactions
being hedged are recognized. Such gains and losses are generally reported on the
same financial line as the hedged transaction. The Company does not use
derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Outstanding as of
20
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
December 31, 2001 and 2000 were $0 and $2,670, respectively, in contracts to
purchase foreign currency forward. There is no significant unrealized gain or
loss on these contracts. All contracts have terms of four months or less.
Advertising and Promotion -- Cost incurred for producing and communicating
advertising are expensed during the period aired, including costs incurred under
the Company's cooperative advertising program. Advertising and promotion costs
were $44,486, $47,154 and $46,546 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000
and 1999, respectively.
Inventories -- Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market using
the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
Inventories at December 31, consisted of the following:
2001 2000
------------ ------------
Finished goods.............................................. $43,277 $37,832
Work in process and component parts......................... 7,530 7,638
------- -------
$50,807 $45,470
======= =======
Property, Plant and Equipment -- The Company capitalizes, as additions to
property, plant and equipment, expenditures at cost for molds, tooling, land,
buildings, equipment, furniture, computer software, and leasehold improvements.
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operating expense as
incurred. The asset and related accumulated depreciation or amortization
accounts are adjusted to reflect retirements and disposals and the resulting
gain or loss is included in the determination of net income.
Internal and external costs incurred to develop internal use computer
software during the application development stage are capitalized and amortized
on the straight line method over the estimated useful life of software.
Capitalized costs include payroll costs and related benefits, costs of related
hardware and consulting fees. During 2001 and 2000, $185 and $94, respectively
of such internal costs were capitalized.
Plant and equipment are depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the
respective classes of assets. Leasehold improvements and assets held under
capital leases are amortized over the shorter of useful lives or their
respective lease terms. Accumulated amortization on assets under capital leases
totaled $1,555 and $1,407 at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Depreciation for financial reporting purposes is computed on the
straight-line method using the following depreciable lives:
Buildings................................................... 40 years
Building under capital lease................................ 20 years
Molds, tooling, and equipment............................... 3 - 5 years
Furniture, office and computer equipment, and software...... 2 - 5 years
Vehicles.................................................... 3 years
Internal use software....................................... 2 - 5 years
Accelerated methods as permitted by the applicable tax law are used for tax
reporting purpose.
The Company reviews for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment
may not be recoverable under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
and for Long Lived Assets to be Disposed Of. If it is determined that an
impairment loss has occurred based on expected future cash flows, the loss is
recognized on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments -- Financial instruments consist of a
revolving credit agreement that is carried at an amount which approximates fair
value.
New Accounting Pronouncements -- The Company implemented Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, in the first quarter of
21
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
2001. The implementation of SFAS No. 133 did not have a material impact on its
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
The Company is required to implement the following new accounting
pronouncements during the first quarter of 2002:
SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" -- This statement requires that all
business combinations be accounted for under a single method, the purchase
method. Use of the pooling-of-interests method is no longer permitted.
SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" -- This statement
addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other
intangible assets, and in summary, discontinues the amortization of goodwill and
other intangibles with indefinite lives.
SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" -- This
statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations
associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated
asset retirement costs.
SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets" -- This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for the
impairment or disposal of long-lived assets.
The Company expects that the implementation of the above standards will not
have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
2. CHANGES IN DEPRECIABLE LIVES AND CHARGES FOR TOOLING OBSOLESCENCE:
During 2001 and 2000, the Company shortened the useful lives of tooling for
certain product families due to declining sales volumes, reduced product life
cycles and the launch of replacement products. As a result of the reduced useful
lives for certain product families, including certain Royal metal products
during 2001 and the Dirt Devil Corded Mop Vac, Dirt Devil Stick Vac and Dirt
Devil Broom Vac during 2000, the Company recorded accelerated depreciation
expense of $191 and $1,788 during 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Also during 2000, the Company relocated its corporate headquarters. As a
result of the move, the remaining net book value of leasehold improvements
associated with the former corporate headquarters was amortized on an
accelerated basis from the date the decision was made to move through the actual
date of the move. Due to this event, accelerated depreciation expense of
approximately $1,200 was recorded in 2000.
During the fourth quarter of 1999, the wholesale price for the cordless
Dirt Devil Mop Vac(R) (Mop Vac) decreased significantly. This reduction in
wholesale price triggered an impairment review for cordless Mop Vac tooling.
Previous to the fourth quarter reduction in wholesale prices, the cordless Mop
Vac had net future cash flows in excess of the remaining net book value of the
tooling. However, earlier that year, the Company shortened the depreciable lives
of such tooling due to the decision to discontinue the product line at the end
of 1999. Subsequent to the price reduction, the product was no longer profitable
and therefore discontinued. As a result of the impairment review, the Company
determined that net future cash flows for the product were negative, therefore,
an impairment charge of $992 was recorded during the fourth quarter of 1999.
During 1999, the Dirt Devil Ultra MVP(R) lost its shelf placement in retail
stores, however, the unit was slotted for special promotions at several
retailers. When the unit lost its shelf placement at retail, an impairment
review was performed resulting in no impairment charge as the estimated net
future cash flows exceeded the net book value of the tooling. During the 1999
Holiday season, the Dirt Devil Ultra MVP had some limited special promotion
distribution. However, retail subsequently lowered the retail price point below
the wholesale price. With the reduction of price, the Company would no longer be
able to produce the unit at a profit, thus triggering an impairment review. As a
result of the review, an impairment charge of $1,629 was recorded at the end of
the fourth quarter and accelerated depreciation of $436 was also taken during
the fourth quarter of 1999.
Prior to the fourth quarter of 1999, due to sales commitments and component
part usage requirements, the assets were considered as "held for use" in
accordance with SFAS No. 121. However, due to specific trigger
22
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
events which occurred during the fourth quarter, the remaining value of the
assets were determined to be impaired and the assets were written down to zero
and removed from service during the fourth quarter of 1999.
3. DEBT:
At December 31, 2001, the Company had a reducing collateralized revolving
credit facility with availability of up to $72,000 and a maturity date of March
7, 2003. Under the agreement, pricing options of the bank's base lending rate
and LIBOR rate are based on a formula, as defined. In addition, the Company pays
a commitment fee based on a formula, as defined, on the unused portion of the
facility. The revolving credit facility contains covenants which require, among
other things, the achievement of minimum net worth levels and the maintenance of
certain financial ratios. The Company was in compliance with all applicable
covenants as of December 31, 2001. The revolving credit facility is
collateralized by the assets of the Company and prohibits the payment of cash
dividends. As long as the Company remains in compliance with all covenants, the
revolving credit facility permits additional share repurchases up to $40,000, of
which $22,952 was utilized through December 31, 2001. The Company's effective
interest rate was 7.34% and 9.28% for 2001 and 2000, respectively.
The Company also utilizes a revolving trade accounts receivable
securitization program to sell without recourse, through a wholly-owned
subsidiary, certain trade accounts receivable. Under the program, the maximum
amount allowed to be sold at any given time through December 31, 2001, was
$35,000. At December 31, 2001 and 2000, the Company had received approximately
$24,700 and $19,200, respectively, from the sale of trade accounts receivable
that has not yet been collected. The proceeds from the sales were used to reduce
borrowings under the Company's revolving credit facility. Costs of the program,
which primarily consist of the purchaser's financing cost of issuing commercial
paper backed by the receivables, totaled $993, $1,559, and $1,281 in 2001, 2000
and 1999, respectively, and have been classified as Receivable securitization
and other (income) expense, net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The Company's effective borrowing rate under this program was 5.42%,
7.56%, and 6.51% for 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. The Company, as agent
for the purchaser of the receivables, retains collection and administrative
responsibilities for the purchased receivables. Additionally, the program
contains covenants which the Company was in compliance with as of December 31,
2001.
4. LEASES:
Royal leases various facilities, equipment, computers, software and
vehicles under capital and operating lease agreements. Operating lease payments
totaled $2,905, $1,912, and $796 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000,
and 1999, respectively.
Minimum commitments under all capital and operating leases at December 31,
2001 are as follows:
YEAR CAPITAL OPERATING
---- ------- ---------
2002........................................................ $ 235 $ 3,419
2003........................................................ 315 3,057
2004........................................................ 317 2,760
2005........................................................ 314 2,117
2006........................................................ 318 1,849
Thereafter.................................................. 1,562 13,438
------ -------
Total minimum lease payments................................ 3,061 $26,640
=======
Less amount representing interest........................... 936
------
Total present value of capital obligation................... 2,125
Less current portion........................................ 147
------
Long-term obligation under capital leases................... $1,978
======
23
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
At December 31, 2001, the Company estimates having contractual commitments
for future advertising and promotional expense of approximately $3,000,
including commitments for television advertising through December 31, 2002.
Other contractual commitments for items in the normal course of business total
approximately $4,300.
The Company is self-insured with respect to workers' compensation benefits
in Ohio and carries excess workers' compensation insurance covering aggregate
claims exceeding $350 per occurrence.
The Hoover Company (Hoover) filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the
Northern District of Ohio (case #1:00cv 0347), against the Company on February
4, 2000, under the patent, trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United
States. The Complaint asserts that the Company's Dirt Devil Easy Steamer
infringes certain patents held by Hoover. Hoover seeks damages, injunction of
future production, and legal fees. The Company is vigorously defending the suit
and believes that it is without merit. If Hoover were to prevail on all of its
claims, it could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.
The Company filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the Northern District of
Ohio (case #1:01cv 2775), against The Hoover Company (Hoover) on December 10,
2001, under the patent, trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United
States. The Complaint asserts that Hoover infringes certain patents relating to
bagless technology held by the Company. The Company seeks damages, injunction on
future production, and legal fees.
The Company filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the Northern District of
Ohio (case #1:02cv 0338), against Bissell Homecare, Inc. (Bissell) in 2002,
under the patent, trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United States.
The Complaint asserts that Bissell infringes certain patents relating to bagless
technology held by the Company. The Company seeks damages, injunction on future
production, and legal fees.
Bissell Homecare, Inc. (Bissell) filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the
Western District of Michigan (case 1:02cv 0142), against the Company in 2002,
under the patent, trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United States.
The complaint asserts that the Company's Dirt Devil Easy Steamer and Platinum
Force Extractor infringes certain patents held by Bissell. Bissell seeks
damages, injunction of future production, and legal fees. The Company is
vigorously defending the suit and believes that it is without merit. If Bissell
were to prevail on all of its claims, it could have a material adverse effect on
the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the
Company.
The Company is involved in various claims and litigation arising in the
normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution
of these actions will not materially affect the consolidated financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.
6. INCOME TAXES:
The income tax expense consisted of the following:
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ -------
Current:
Federal.................................................. $4,888 $ 782 $ 8,683
State and local.......................................... 552 125 780
Deferred................................................... (382) 618 (1,853)
------ ------ -------
Total...................................................... $5,058 $1,525 $ 7,610
====== ====== =======
24
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Deferred income taxes reflect the impact, for financial statement reporting
purposes, of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. At December 31, 2001 and
2000, the components of the net deferred tax asset were as follows:
2001 2000
------- -------
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS:
Warranty and customer returns............................. $ 3,881 $ 4,017
Bad debt reserve.......................................... 1,170 507
Inventory basis difference................................ 636 833
Accrued vacation, compensation and benefits............... 866 422
State and local taxes..................................... 127 166
Accrued advertising....................................... 98 164
Self insurance reserves................................... 90 59
Deferred compensation plan................................ 164 154
State and local taxes..................................... -- 309
Other..................................................... -- 7
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES:
Accounts receivable mark to market........................ -- (658)
Basis difference in fixed and intangible assets........... (4,566) (4,409)
State and local taxes..................................... (240) --
Other..................................................... (1,688) (1,415)
------- -------
Net deferred tax asset...................................... $ 538 $ 156
======= =======
The differences between income taxes at the statutory federal income tax
rate of 34% and those reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations are
as follows:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
% OF % OF % OF
PRE-TAX PRE-TAX PRE-TAX
2001 INCOME 2000 INCOME 1999 INCOME
------ ------- ------- ------- ------ -------
Tax expense at statutory rate..... $4,890 34.0% $ 2,538 34.0% $6,900 34.0%
Research & experimentation
credit.......................... (400) (2.8) (1,130) (15.1) -- --
State and local income taxes, net
of federal benefit.............. 360 2.5 81 1.1 507 2.5
Federal surtax on income over $10
million......................... 42 0.3 -- -- 196 1.0
Other, net........................ 166 1.2 36 0.4 7 --
------ ---- ------- ----- ------ ----
$5,058 35.2% $ 1,525 20.4% $7,610 37.5%
====== ==== ======= ===== ====== ====
During 2000, the Company performed a detailed study of Research and
Experimentation ("R&E") expenses over the preceding three-year period. As a
result of this study, it was determined that additional expenditures qualify
under the current guidance. Based on revised calculations, the Company was
entitled to R & E credits of $462, $166 and $302 for the years ended 1999, 1998
and 1997, respectively. These Federal Income Tax refunds were received in 2001.
For the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, the R & E credit amounted to
$400 and $200, respectively.
7. MAJOR CUSTOMERS:
Royal's three largest customers represented approximately 31.1%, 14.3%, and
14.1% of total net sales in 2001. The Company's three largest customers
represented approximately 32.6%, 13.5% and 13.1% in 2000 and
25
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
36.9%, 13.6% and 12.1% of total net sales in 1999. Additionally, a significant
concentration of Royal's business activity is with major domestic mass market
retailers whose ability to meet their financial obligations with Royal is
dependent on economic conditions germane to the retail industry. During recent
years, several major retailers have experienced significant financial
difficulties and some, including Kmart, have filed for protection from creditors
under applicable bankruptcy laws. As of December 31, 2001, the net exposure
related to Kmart as well as other customers balances for which management
believes collection is doubtful was included in the calculation of allowance for
doubtful accounts. The Company sells its products to certain customers that are
in bankruptcy proceedings.
The Company provides credit, in the normal course of business, to the
retail industry which includes mass market retailers, warehouse clubs, and
independent dealers. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its
customers and establishes appropriate allowances for doubtful accounts based
upon factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers, historical
trends and other information.
8. STOCK BASED PLANS:
Under the terms of the Company's stock option plans for employees, outside
directors and consultants, all outstanding options have been granted at prices
at least equal to the then current market value on the date of grant. Certain
stock options granted become exercisable in cumulative 20% installments,
commencing one year from date of grant with full vesting occurring on the fifth
anniversary date, and expire in ten years, subject to earlier termination in
certain events related to termination of employment. Other stock options granted
vest at the end of five years ("5 year cliff vesting") and expire in six to ten
years, subject to earlier termination in certain events related to termination
of employment. Vesting may be accelerated in certain events relating to change
of the Company's ownership.
The following summarizes the changes in the number of Common Shares under
option:
2001 2000 1999
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Options outstanding at beginning of
the year........................... 2,673 2,764 2,244
Options granted during the year...... 204 90 673
Options exercised during the year.... (321) (45) (116)
Options canceled during the year..... (185) (136) (37)
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Options outstanding at end of the
year............................... 2,371 2,673 2,764
=============== =============== ===============
Options exercisable at end of the
year............................... 1,651 865 669
Option price range per share......... $2.50 to $10.25 $2.50 to $10.25 $2.50 to $10.25
The 1,651 exercisable options at December 31, 2001 are exercisable at an
average exercise price of $6.14. The Company's current option plans, which
provide for a total of 3,060 options, have 59 options remaining for future
grants at December 31, 2001.
The Company adopted the disclosure only provisions of SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" in fiscal 1996. As permitted by SFAS
No. 123, the Company continues to measure compensation cost in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations
in accounting for its plans. Had compensation cost for the Company's stock-based
compensation plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates
for awards under these plans consistent with the method of
26
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
SFAS 123, the Company's net income and earnings per share would have been
reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ -------
Net income (in thousands)
As reported............................................. $9,324 $5,939 $12,682
Pro forma............................................... $9,091 $5,623 $12,314
Basic earnings per share
As reported............................................. $ .68 $ .39 $ .70
Pro forma............................................... $ .66 $ .37 $ .68
Diluted earnings per share
As reported............................................. $ .65 $ .38 $ .69
Pro forma............................................... $ .64 $ .36 $ .67
The effect on net income and earnings per share is not expected to be
indicative of the effects on net income and earnings per share in future years.
Since the SFAS No. 123 method of accounting has not been applied to options
granted prior to 1995, the resulting pro forma compensation costs may not be
representative of those to be expected in future years. The fair value of each
option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------- ------- -------
Expected volatility....................................... 35.7% 36.6% 39.0%
Risk-free interest rate................................... 4.85% 5.12% 6.70%
Expected life of options in years......................... 7 years 7 years 7 years
Expected dividend yield................................... 0% 0% 0%
During fiscal years 2001, 2000 and 1999 the weighted average grant-date
fair value of options granted was $2.17, $2.39 and $1.44 per share,
respectively.
The Company has also established compensation plans under which stock
rights have been granted to certain key employees to receive Company stock upon
exercise. These rights become 60% vested on the third anniversary from date of
grant and an additional 20% vested for each subsequent year, subject to earlier
termination in certain events related to termination of employment. Vesting may
be accelerated in certain events relating to change of the Company's ownership.
During 2001 and 2000, the Company awarded 116 and 330 stock rights under the
plans, respectively, with a weighted average fair value at the date of grant of
$4.25 and $4.89 per share for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000,
respectively. The Company amortizes unearned compensation to expense over the
five-year vesting period. Compensation expense related to these awards was $586
and $361 for 2001 and 2000, respectively. At December 31, 2001, 4 total stock
rights were reserved for future issuance.
9. SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN:
The Company has a Shareholder Rights Plan which provides that under certain
circumstances each Right will entitle the shareholder to purchase one
one-hundredth of a share of Series A Participating Preferred Stock at an
exercise price of $40. Upon the occurrence of certain other events, including if
a "Person" becomes the beneficial owner of more than 20% of the outstanding
Common Shares or an "Adverse Person" becomes the beneficial owner of 10% of the
outstanding Common Shares, the holder of a Right will have the right to receive,
upon exercise, Common Shares of the Company, or Common Stock of the acquirer,
having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the Right. The
Shareholder Rights Plan is designed to deter abusive market manipulation or
unfair takeover tactics and to prevent an acquirer from gaining control of the
Company without
27
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
offering a fair price to all shareholders. The Rights expire on November 2,
2003, unless redeemed prior to that date. The Rights can be redeemed at a price
of $.01 per Right.
10. BENEFIT PLANS:
The Company sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan which covers
substantially all of its employees who have satisfied the plan's eligibility
requirements. Participants may contribute to the plan by voluntarily reducing
their salary up to a maximum of 15% of qualified compensation subject to annual
I.R.S. limits. All contributions vest immediately. For each of the last three
years, the matching contribution was 100%, up to the first 3% of qualified
compensation, and 50% of the next 2% of such compensation. The Company has also
made discretionary contributions to the plan. The Company's provisions for
matching and discretionary contributions totaled approximately $965, $1,017, and
$906 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Voluntary after-tax contributions and certain rollover contributions are also
permitted.
The Company also sponsors a non-qualified deferred compensation plan which
permits key employees to annually elect (via individual contracts) to defer a
portion of their compensation on a pre-tax basis until retirement. The
retirement benefit to be provided is based on the amount of compensation
deferred, Company match and investment earnings. All contributions vest
immediately. Although the Plan is designed to be unfunded, the Company has
funded the deferred compensation liability with investments in marketable
securities, primarily stock mutual funds, which are classified as current
assets. The Company's provisions for matching and discretionary contributions
totaled approximately $72, $77, and $25 for the years ended December 31, 2001,
2000 and 1999, respectively. The deferred compensation liability which equals
the related assets recorded by the Company was $419 and $395 as of December 31,
2001 and 2000, respectively.
The Company does not offer any other post-retirement benefits, accordingly,
it is not subject to the provisions of SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for
Post Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions."
11. SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM:
In February 2000, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a common
share repurchase program that enabled the Company to purchase, in the open
market and through negotiated transactions, up to an additional 4,250 of its
outstanding common shares. The Company completed the program repurchasing 3,289
shares for an aggregate purchase price of $20,065 in February 2001. In April
2001, the Company's Board of Directors authorized another common share
repurchase program that enables the Company to purchase, in the open market and
through negotiated transactions, up to an additional 3,400 of its outstanding
common shares. As of March 11, 2002, the Company has repurchased approximately
1,052 for an aggregate purchase price of $5,250 under the program that expires
in December 2002.
28
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
12. EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing
income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted earnings per share includes the dilution of common stock
equivalents.
2001 2000 1999
------- ------- -------
Net income.................................................. $ 9,324 $ 5,939 $12,682
======= ======= =======
BASIC:
Common shares outstanding, net of treasury shares,
beginning of year...................................... 13,729 16,973 19,622
Weighted average common shares issued during year......... 170 23 68
Weighted average treasury shares repurchased during
year................................................... (168) (1,913) (1,535)
------- ------- -------
Weighted average common shares outstanding, net of treasury
shares, end of year....................................... 13,731 15,083 18,155
======= ======= =======
Net income per common share................................. $ .68 $ .39 $ .70
======= ======= =======
DILUTED:
Common shares outstanding, net of treasury shares,
beginning of year...................................... 13,729 16,973 19,622
Weighted average common shares issued during year......... 170 23 68
Weighted average common share equivalents................. 566 491 216
Weighted average treasury shares repurchased during
year................................................... (168) (1,913) (1,535)
------- ------- -------
Weighted average common shares outstanding, net of treasury
shares, end of year....................................... 14,297 15,574 18,371
======= ======= =======
Net income per common share................................. $ .65 $ .38 $ .69
======= ======= =======
13. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION:
The Company has two reportable segments: Consumer Products -- Floorcare and
Consumer Products -- Other. The operations of the Consumer Products -- Floorcare
segment includes the design, assembly or sourcing, marketing and distribution of
a full line of plastic and metal vacuum cleaners. The primary brand names
associated with this segment include Dirt Devil and Royal. These products are
sold primarily to major mass merchant retailers and independent dealers in North
America. The operations of the Consumer Products -- Other segment represents
business conducted by Privacy Technologies, Inc. and Product Launch Partners,
Inc., both of which are wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. Currently, the
primary product line within this segment is the TeleZapper, a telephone
attachment that helps block unwanted telemarketing calls and removes consumers'
phone numbers from telemarketers' computerized dialing lists. These products are
sold primarily to major mass merchant retailers and national electronic chains
in North America.
The Company's reportable segments are distinguished by the nature of
products sold. The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources to
reportable segments primarily based on net sales and operating income. The
accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described
in Note 1. The Company records its federal and state tax assets and liabilities
at corporate. There are no intersegment sales.
29
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
Financial information for the Company's reportable segments consisted of
the following:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
Net Sales
Consumer Products -- Floorcare..................... $406,502 $408,223 $407,984
Consumer Products -- Other......................... 21,923 -- --
-------- -------- --------
Consolidated Total................................. $428,425 $408,223 $407,984
======== ======== ========
Income from Operations
Consumer Products -- Floorcare..................... $ 15,882 $ 12,680 $ 23,062
Consumer Products -- Other......................... 2,096 -- --
-------- -------- --------
Consolidated Total................................. $ 17,978 $ 12,680 $ 23,062
======== ======== ========
Capital Expenditures
Consumer Products -- Floorcare..................... $ 6,011 $ 7,298 $ 16,827
Consumer Products -- Other......................... 74 -- --
-------- -------- --------
Total for Reportable Segments...................... 6,085 7,298 16,827
Corporate.......................................... 7,757 6,076 2,054
-------- -------- --------
Consolidated Total................................. $ 13,842 $ 13,374 $ 18,881
======== ======== ========
Depreciation and Amortization
Consumer Products -- Floorcare..................... $ 12,079 $ 13,046 $ 11,012
Consumer Products -- Other......................... 208 -- --
-------- -------- --------
Total for Reportable Segments...................... 12,287 13,046 11,012
Corporate.......................................... 2,992 2,790 884
-------- -------- --------
Consolidated Total................................. $ 15,279 $ 15,836 $ 11,896
======== ======== ========
Total Assets
Consumer Products -- Floorcare..................... $114,376 $124,638 $139,763
Consumer Products -- Other......................... 6,773 -- --
-------- -------- --------
Total for Reportable Segments...................... 121,149 124,638 139,763
Corporate.......................................... 19,295 13,914 12,129
-------- -------- --------
Consolidated Total................................. $140,444 $138,552 $151,892
======== ======== ========
Financial information related to the Company's operations by geographic
location consisted of the following:
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
REVENUES, NET:
United States...................................... $408,289 $389,867 $390,121
All other Countries................................ 20,136 18,356 17,863
-------- -------- --------
$428,425 $408,223 $407,984
======== ======== ========
LONG LIVED ASSETS, NET:
United States...................................... $ 32,527 $ 38,109 $ 34,676
All other Countries................................ 5,047 3,699 4,219
-------- -------- --------
$ 37,574 $ 41,808 $ 38,895
======== ======== ========
30
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information required by this Item with respect to Executive Officers of the
Company is set forth in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Information
required by this Item with respect to members of the Board of Directors of the
Company contained under the headings "Nominees for Terms Expiring in 2004" and
"Directors whose Terms Expire in 2003" in the Company's Proxy Statement, dated
March 27, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference.
Information required by this Item with respect to compliance with Section
16 of the Exchange Act contained under the heading "Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Company's Proxy Statement, dated March
27, 2002, is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item relating to executive compensation
contained under the headings "Compensation of Directors", "Executive Officers'
Compensation", "Options/SAR Grants in 2001", "Aggregated Option/SAR Exercises in
2001 and Year-End Option/SAR Values", and "Change-in-Control and Other
Employment Arrangements" in the Company's Proxy Statement, dated March 27, 2002,
is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this Item contained under the headings
"Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners" and "Security Ownership of
Management", in the Company's Proxy Statement, dated March 27, 2002, is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
None
31
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
PAGE
-----
(a) (1) Financial Statements
Report of Independent Accountants........................... 15
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2001 and 2000... 16
Consolidated Statements of Operations -- Years Ended
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999.......................... 17
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity -- Years
Ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999.................... 18
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -- Years Ended
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999.......................... 19
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. 20-30
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
The following consolidated financial statement schedule of
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. and Subsidiaries is included in
Item 14(d):
Report of Independent Accountants on Financial Statement
Schedule.................................................. 34
Schedule II -- Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.......... 35
All other schedules for which provision is made in the
applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission are not required under the related
instructions, are inapplicable, or the information has
been included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
(3) Exhibits
The exhibits filed herewith are set forth on the Index to
Exhibits filed as part of this report..................... 36-37
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended
December 31, 2001......................................... --
32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 15th day of
March, 2002.
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
Registrant
By /s/ MICHAEL J. MERRIMAN
--------------------------------------
Michael J. Merriman
Chief Executive Officer and President
Date March 15, 2002
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities indicated, as of the 15th day of March 2002.
SIGNATURE TITLE
--------- -----
/s/ MICHAEL J. MERRIMAN Chief Executive Officer, President and
--------------------------------------------- Director
Michael J. Merriman (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ RICHARD G. VASEK Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
--------------------------------------------- (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Richard G. Vasek
/s/ R. LOUIS SCHNEEBERGER* Chairman of the Board
---------------------------------------------
R. Louis Schneeberger
/s/ JACK KAHL JR.* Director
---------------------------------------------
Jack Kahl Jr.
/s/ E. PATRICK NALLEY* Director
---------------------------------------------
E. Patrick Nalley
/s/ J.B. RICHEY* Director
---------------------------------------------
J.B. Richey
/s/ JOHN P. ROCHON* Director
---------------------------------------------
John P. Rochon
---------------
* The undersigned, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign this Form 10-K
on behalf of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co., and the above named directors and
officers of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co., pursuant to a Power of Attorney executed
on behalf of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. and each of such directors and officers
and which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
/s/ MICHAEL J. MERRIMAN
--------------------------------------
Michael J. Merriman
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Director,
and Attorney-in-Fact
33
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
report dated February 11, 2002, appearing on page 15 of the Form 10-K also
included an audit of the financial statement schedule listed as Schedule II of
this Form 10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
February 11, 2002
34
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II -- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, 2000, AND 2001
BALANCE AT ADDITIONS CHARGED TO BALANCE AT
BEGINNING OF YEAR EXPENSES AND COSTS DEDUCTIONS END OF YEAR
----------------- -------------------- ---------- -----------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS:
Year Ended December 31, 1999........ $1,500 $ 595 $1,195(A) $ 900
Year Ended December 31, 2000........ $ 900 $ 321 $ (79)(A) $1,300
Year Ended December 31, 2001........ $1,300 $2,118 $ 418(A) $3,000
INVENTORY RESERVE:
Year Ended December 31, 1999........ $1,475 $2,444(B) $1,591(C) $2,328
Year Ended December 31, 2000........ $2,328 $2,707(B) $3,190(C) $1,845
Year Ended December 31, 2001........ $1,845 $ 650(B) $1,308(C) $1,187
---------------
Note:
(A) Uncollectible accounts charged off, less recoveries.
(B) Reserve for product model changes.
(C) Disposal of obsolete inventory.
35
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
FOR FORM 10-K
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
3(a) Articles of Incorporation, amended and restated May 4, 1992,
filed as Exhibit 3.1 of Registrant's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1992, filed with
the Commission on August 13, 1992, and incorporated herein
by reference.
3(b) Code of Regulations, amended and restated May 4, 1992, filed
as Exhibit 3.2 of Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 1992, filed with the
Commission on August 13, 1992, incorporated herein by
reference.
3(c) Amendment to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
October 21, 1993, filed as an Exhibit to Registrant's Form
8-K filed with the Commission on November 1, 1993, and
incorporated herein by reference.
4(a) Credit Agreement dated as of March 7, 2000, by and among the
Registrant and various banks including National City Bank as
administrative agent, filed as Exhibit 4(a) to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999,
incorporated herein by reference.
4(b) Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of January 23, 2001,
among Royal Appliance Receivables, Inc., as Seller, the
Registrant, Market Street Funding Corporation and PNC Bank,
National Association, filed as Exhibit 4(b) to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000,
incorporated herein by reference.
4(c) Amendment No. 1 to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated
August 24, 2001.
The Registrant agrees to furnish copies of certain of its
other long-term debt to the Commission upon request.
4(d) Shareholder Rights Agreement dated as of October 21, 1993,
filed as an Exhibit to Registrant's Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on November 1, 1993, and incorporated herein by
reference.
10(a) Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. 1991 Stock Option Plan for Outside
Directors, filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant's
Registration Statement on Forms S-1, filed with the
Commission on August 6, 1991, file number 33-41211 (the
"Initial Registration Statement"), incorporated herein by
reference.
10(b) Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. Employees and Consultants Stock
Option Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Initial
Registration Statement, incorporated herein by reference.
10(c) Form of Indemnity Agreement for Directors and Officers of
the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 10.38 to the Initial
Registration Statement, incorporated herein by reference.
10(d) Form of Severance and Employment Arrangement between the
Registrant and Mssrs. Farone, Vasek and Brickner, filed as
Exhibit 10(g) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1994, incorporated herein by reference.
10(e) Annual Management Incentive Plan Description. Filed as
Exhibit 10(f) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1993, incorporated herein by reference.
10(f) Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. Key Executive Long-Term Incentive
Plan filed as Exhibit 10(f) to the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, incorporated
herein by reference.
10(g) Separation Agreement between the Registrant and Mr. Moone
dated March 6, 2002.
10(h) Form of Amendment to Severance and Employment Agreement
between the registrant and Mssrs. Farone, Vasek and Brickner
filed as Exhibit 10(h) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2000, incorporated herein by
reference.
10(i) Employment Agreement dated March 14, 2002, between the
Registrant and Mr. Merriman.
10(j) Royal Appliance 401(k) Plus Plan, effective October 1, 1999
filed as Exhibit 10(i) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1999, incorporated herein by
reference.
10(k) Royal Appliance Phantom Stock Plan, effective March 31,
2000, filed as Exhibit 10(k) of Registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, and
incorporated herein by reference.
36
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
FOR FORM 10-K -- (CONTINUED)
EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION
------- -----------
10(l) Royal Appliance Phantom Stock Plan, effective December 15,
2000, filed as Exhibit 10(l) to the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, incorporated
herein by reference.
10(m) Royal Appliance Phantom Stock Plan, dated April 23, 2001,
filed as Exhibit 10(p) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2001, incorporated herein by
reference.
10(n) Lease dated October 15, 1996, as amended, with respect to
Glenwillow, Ohio property filed as Exhibit 10(l) of
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference.
10(o) Promissory Note dated April 2, 2001, between Michael J.
Merriman and the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 10(n) to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2001, incorporated herein by reference.
10(p) Stock Pledge Agreement dated April 2, 2001, between Michael
J. Merriman and the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 10(o) to
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2001, incorporated herein by reference.
21 Subsidiaries of Registrant.
23 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP regarding S-8
Registration.
24 Powers of Attorney of the Registrant, Directors and
Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant.
99.1 Form 11-K Annual Report for Royal Appliance 401(k)
Retirement Savings Plan.
99.2 Consent of independent accountants.
37
ANNEX E
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
---------------------
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002.
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-19431
---------------------
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
OHIO 34-1350353
((State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
7005 COCHRAN ROAD, GLENWILLOW, OHIO 44139
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) Zip Code
(440) 996-2000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate, by check mark, whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes
of common shares, as of the latest practicable date.
COMMON SHARES, WITHOUT PAR VALUE 12,816,452
(Class) (Outstanding at November 13, 2002)
The Exhibit index appears on sequential page 22.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PAGE
NUMBER
-------
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Balance Sheets -- September 30, 2002 and
December 31, 2001........................................... 3
Consolidated Statements of Operations -- Three and nine
months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001.................... 4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -- Nine months ended
September 30, 2002 and 2001................................. 5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................. 6 - 10
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS................................... 11 - 15
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK........................................................ 16
ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES..................................... 16
ITEM 6 EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K............................ 16
SIGNATURES......................................................................... 17
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350................................................. 18
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350................................................. 19
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 15
U.S.C. 78m(a) or 70o(d)..................................... 20
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 15
U.S.C. 78m(a) or 70o(d)..................................... 21
EXHIBIT INDEX * Numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.... 22
2
PART I -- FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
2002 2001
------------- ------------
(UNAUDITED)
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash...................................................... $ 2,278 $ 3,421
Trade accounts receivable, net............................ 38,000 35,986
Inventories............................................... 63,114 50,807
Deferred income taxes..................................... 4,096 4,549
Prepaid expenses and other................................ 3,069 1,636
-------- --------
Total current assets.................................. 110,557 96,399
-------- --------
Property, plant and equipment, at cost:
Land...................................................... 1,541 1,541
Building.................................................. 7,777 7,777
Molds, tooling, and equipment............................. 52,403 52,031
Furniture, office and computer equipment and software..... 15,344 12,154
Assets under capital leases............................... 3,171 3,171
Leasehold improvements and other.......................... 7,230 7,456
-------- --------
87,466 84,130
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization........ (52,746) (46,556)
-------- --------
34,720 37,574
-------- --------
Computer software and tooling deposits...................... 884 4,405
Other....................................................... 2,412 2,066
-------- --------
Total assets.......................................... $148,573 $140,444
======== ========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Trade accounts payable.................................... $ 33,739 $ 27,433
Accrued liabilities:
Advertising and promotion............................... 7,797 11,196
Salaries, benefits, and payroll taxes................... 4,849 7,258
Warranty and customer returns........................... 9,200 9,950
Income taxes............................................ 881 1,370
Other................................................... 5,688 6,479
Current portions of capital lease obligations............. 158 147
-------- --------
Total current liabilities............................. 62,312 63,833
-------- --------
Revolving credit facility................................. 43,000 32,000
Capitalized lease obligations, less current portion....... 1,870 1,978
-------- --------
Total long-term debt.................................. 44,870 33,978
Deferred income taxes..................................... 3,675 4,011
-------- --------
Total liabilities..................................... 110,857 101,822
-------- --------
Commitments and contingencies (Note 3).................... -- --
Shareholders' equity:
Common shares, at stated value............................ 215 214
Additional paid-in capital................................ 45,363 44,167
Retained earnings......................................... 72,379 70,489
-------- --------
117,957 114,870
Less treasury shares, at cost (13,102,800 and 12,365,700
shares at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001,
respectively)........................................... (80,241) (76,248)
-------- --------
Total shareholders' equity............................ 37,716 38,622
-------- --------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity............ $148,573 $140,444
======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
---------------------- -----------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
--------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(UNAUDITED)
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
Net sales........................................... $91,705 $111,503 $272,259 $294,075
Cost of sales....................................... 70,619 85,042 216,481 231,173
------- -------- -------- --------
Gross margin...................................... 21,086 26,461 55,778 62,902
Selling, general and administrative expenses........ 15,417 19,210 51,261 51,419
------- -------- -------- --------
Income from operations............................ 5,669 7,251 4,517 11,483
Interest expense, net............................... 423 674 1,042 1,897
Receivable securitization and other expense, net.... 436 350 589 1,065
------- -------- -------- --------
Income before income taxes........................ 4,810 6,227 2,886 8,521
Income tax expense.................................. 1,676 2,142 996 2,970
------- -------- -------- --------
Net income........................................ $ 3,134 $ 4,085 $ 1,890 $ 5,551
======= ======== ======== ========
BASIC
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
(in thousands).................................... 12,816 13,649 13,036 13,786
Earnings per share.................................. $ .24 $ .30 $ .14 $ .40
DILUTED
Weighted average number of common shares and
equivalents outstanding (in thousands)............ 13,688 14,269 13,941 14,350
Earnings per share.................................. $ .23 $ .29 $ .14 $ .39
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
-----------------------
2002 2001
---------- ----------
(UNAUDITED)
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income................................................ $ 1,890 $ 5,551
-------- --------
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization.......................... 12,515 11,061
Compensatory effect of stock awards.................... 825 412
Deferred income taxes.................................. 117 (839)
(Increase) decrease in assets:
Trade accounts receivable, net....................... (2,014) (6,665)
Inventories.......................................... (12,307) (15,068)
Prepaid expenses and other........................... (1,433) (175)
Other................................................ (1,134) (1,706)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Trade accounts payable............................... 6,306 11,517
Accrued advertising and promotion.................... (3,399) (2,149)
Accrued salaries, benefits, and payroll taxes........ (2,409) 2,352
Accrued warranty and customer returns................ (750) (50)
Accrued income taxes................................. (489) 1,503
Accrued other........................................ (791) (350)
-------- --------
Total adjustments................................. (4,963) (157)
-------- --------
Net cash from operating activities................ (3,073) 5,394
-------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of tooling, property, plant, and equipment,
net.................................................... (8,873) (9,710)
Decrease (increase) in tooling deposits and other......... 3,521 (2,443)
-------- --------
Net cash from investing activities................ (5,352) (12,153)
-------- --------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds on bank debt, net................................ 11,000 7,700
Proceeds from exercise of stock options................... 372 310
Payments on capital lease obligations..................... (97) (102)
Repurchase of common stock................................ (3,993) (758)
-------- --------
Net cash from financing activities................ 7,282 7,150
-------- --------
Net (decrease) increase in cash............................. (1,143) 391
-------- --------
Cash at beginning of period................................. 3,421 704
-------- --------
Cash at end of period....................................... $ 2,278 $ 1,095
======== ========
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash payments for:
Interest.................................................. $ 1,150 $ 1,993
======== ========
Income taxes, net of refunds.............................. $ 1,368 $ 2,306
======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
NOTE 1 -- BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The financial information for Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. and Subsidiaries
(the Company) included herein is unaudited; however, such information reflects
all adjustments (including all normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the
opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated
balance sheets as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, and the related
statements of operations and cash flows as of, and for the interim periods
ended, September 30, 2002 and 2001. These condensed financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes
thereto included in the Company's latest annual report (Form 10-K).
The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2002, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected
for the full year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and
related disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts, the reserve
for returns and allowances, reserve for inventory obsolescence and depreciation
and amortization, among others.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2002
presentation.
Net income per common share is computed based on the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for basic earnings per share and on the
weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents
outstanding for diluted earnings per share.
The Company's revenue recognition policy is to recognize revenues when
products are shipped. The Company's return policy is to replace, repair or issue
credit for product under warranty. Returns received during the current period
are expensed as received and a provision is provided for estimated future
returns and sales agreements with certain customers. The Company records
estimated reductions to net sales for customer programs and incentive offerings
including pricing arrangements, promotions and other volume based incentives. If
market conditions were to soften, the Company may take actions to increase
customer incentives, possibly resulting in a reduction of net sales and gross
margins at the time the incentive is offered. The Company's revenue recognition
policy is in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue
Recognition in Financial Statements." The Company includes royalty income from
various license agreements in net sales. During the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2002 and 2001, royalty income totaled $433 and $205, respectively.
In fiscal 2001, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") issued EITF No.
00-14, "Accounting for Certain Sales Incentives," and EITF No. 00-25, "Vendor
Income Statement Characterization of Consideration to a Purchaser of the
Vendor's Products or Services" (both of which were clarified by EITF 01-09
"Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer"). These
pronouncements address the recognition, measurement and statement of operations
classification for certain sales incentives and are effective January 1, 2002.
The Company adopted these pronouncements in the first quarter of fiscal 2002 and
as a result certain items previously included in selling, general and
administrative expenses were reclassified as a reduction of net sales.
Additionally, prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the new
requirements. The impact of these two issues resulted in a reduction of net
sales of $1,378 and $1,223 for the quarters ended September 30, 2002 and 2001,
respectively and $2,967 and $3,620 for the nine-month periods ended September
30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. These amounts, consisting principally of
promotional allowances to the Company's retail customers, were previously
recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses; therefore, there was
no impact to net income for either period.
International operations, primarily Canadian, are conducted in their local
currency. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are
translated at current exchange rates, and income and expenses are translated
using weighted average exchange rates. The net effect of currency gains and
losses realized on these business transactions is included in the determination
of net income.
6
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
The Company has used forward exchange contracts to reduce fluctuations in
foreign currency cash flows related to receivables denominated in foreign
currencies. The terms of the currency instruments are consistent with the timing
of the transactions being hedged. The purpose of the Company's foreign currency
management activity is to protect the Company from the risk that the eventual
cash flows from the foreign currency denominated transactions may be adversely
affected by changes in exchange rates. Gains and losses on forward exchange
contracts are deferred and recognized in income when the related transactions
being hedged are recognized. Such gains and losses are generally reported on the
same financial line as the hedged transaction. The Company does not use
derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. There were
no contracts to purchase foreign currency forward outstanding as of September
30, 2002 or December 31, 2001.
Costs incurred for producing and communicating advertising are expensed
during the period aired, including costs incurred under the Company's
cooperative advertising program.
NOTE 2 -- INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market using the first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method. Inventories at September 30, 2002, and December 31,
2001, consisted of the following:
SEPTEMBER 30 DECEMBER 31
------------ -----------
Finished goods.............................................. $56,596 $43,277
Work in process and purchased parts......................... 6,518 7,530
------- -------
$63,114 $50,807
======= =======
NOTE 3 -- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
At September 30, 2002, the Company estimates having contractual commitments
for future advertising and promotional expense of approximately $6,700 including
commitments for television advertising through December 31, 2002. Other
contractual commitments for items in the normal course of business total
approximately $3,000.
The Company is self-insured with respect to workers' compensation benefits
in Ohio and carries excess workers' compensation insurance covering aggregate
claims exceeding $350 per occurrence.
The Hoover Company (Hoover) filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the
Northern District of Ohio (case #1:00cv 0347), against the Company on February
4, 2000, under the patent, trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United
States. The Complaint asserted that the Company's Dirt Devil Easy Steamer
infringed three utility patents and two design patents held by Hoover, and also
that the Easy Steamer design infringed the trade dress of Hoover's carpet
extractor products. The Court had dismissed charges of infringement against
Royal regarding one of the three utility patents, and found that the Dirt Devil
Easy Steamer infringed one claim of a second utility patent. The Company filed a
lawsuit in federal court, in the Northern District of Ohio (case #1:01cv 2775),
against The Hoover Company (Hoover) on December 10, 2001, under the patent,
trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United States. The Complaint
asserted that Hoover infringed certain patents relating to bagless technology
held by the Company. On October 17, 2002, the Company and Hoover reached a
settlement of all patent-related litigation described above. Hoover has granted
rights to the Company with regard to its existing carpet extractor patents. The
Company has granted rights to Hoover with regard to its existing bagless upright
vacuum cleaner patents. The settlement includes cash payments to the Company.
The Company filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the Northern District of
Ohio (case #1:02cv 0338), against Bissell Homecare, Inc. (Bissell) on February
22, 2002, under the patent, trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United
States. The Complaint asserts that Bissell infringes certain patents relating to
bagless technology held by the Company. The Company seeks damages, injunction on
future production, and legal fees.
Bissell Homecare, Inc. (Bissell) filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the
Eastern District of Michigan (case #02cv71079), against the Company on March 20,
2002, under the patent, trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United
States. On April 25, 2002, the Company filed a motion to transfer the case from
the Eastern District
7
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
of Michigan to the Northern District of Ohio. On June 19, 2002, the Court
transferred the case (now #1:02cv 1358) to the Northern District of Ohio. The
Complaint asserts that the Company's Dirt Devil Easy Steamer and Platinum Force
Extractor products infringe certain design and utility patents held by Bissell.
Bissell seeks damages, injunction on future production, and legal fees. The
Company is vigorously defending the suit and believes it is without merit. If
Bissell were to prevail on all its claims, it could have a material adverse
effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows of the Company.
The Company filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the Northern District of
Ohio (case #1:02cv 1127), against White Consolidated, Ltd. (Eureka) on June 14,
2002, under the patent, trademark and unfair competition laws of the United
Sates. The Complaint asserts that Eureka infringes certain patents relating to
bagless technology held by the Company. The Company seeks damages, injunction on
future production, and legal fees.
The Company is involved in various other claims and litigation arising in
the normal course of business. The Company has product liability and general
liability insurance policies in amounts management believes to be reasonable.
There can be no assurance, however, that such insurance will be adequate to
cover all potential product or other liability claims against the Company. In
the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of these actions will not
materially affect the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or
cash flows of the Company.
NOTE 4 -- DEBT
At September 30, 2002, the Company has a collateralized revolving credit
facility with availability of up to $70,000 and a maturity date of April 1,
2005. Under the agreement, pricing options of the bank's base lending rate and
LIBOR rate are based on a defined formula. In addition, the Company pays a
commitment fee based on a defined formula on the unused portion of the facility.
The revolving credit facility contains covenants, which require, among other
things, the achievement of minimum net worth levels and the maintenance of
certain financial ratios. The Company was in compliance with all applicable
covenants as of September 30, 2002. The revolving credit facility is
collateralized by the assets of the Company. As long as the Company remains in
compliance with all covenants, the revolving credit facility permits share
repurchases and dividends based on a defined formula up to $18,369 as of
September 30, 2002.
The Company also utilizes a revolving trade accounts receivable
securitization program to sell without recourse, through a wholly-owned
subsidiary, certain trade accounts receivable. Under the program, the maximum
amount allowed to be sold at any given time is $30,000, seasonally adjusted to
$35,000 from September to December. At September 30, 2002, the Company had
received approximately $18,100 from the sale of trade accounts receivable that
have not yet been collected. The proceeds from the sales were used to reduce
borrowings under the Company's revolving credit facility. Costs of the program,
which primarily consist of the purchaser's financing cost of issuing commercial
paper backed by the receivables, totaled $584 and $877 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and have been classified as
"Receivable securitization and other expense, net" in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company, as agent for the purchaser
of the receivables, retains collection and administrative responsibilities for
the purchased receivables. The Company is required to maintain certain financial
ratios associated with the receivables included within the program. The current
program with the existing provider will be terminated in January 2003 and be
replaced by another provider. The terms and conditions of the new agreement are
substantially the same as the current program.
NOTE 5 -- SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM
In April 2001, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a common share
repurchase program that provides for the Company to purchase, in the open market
and through negotiated transactions, up to 3,400 of its outstanding common
shares. As of November 13, 2002, the Company has repurchased approximately 1,322
shares for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $6,900 under the program
that is scheduled to expire in December 2002.
8
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
NOTE 6 -- EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS")
No. 128, Earnings per Share, for the calculation of earnings per share. Basic
earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
earnings per share includes the dilution of common stock equivalents.
THREE MONTHS ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------ ------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------- ------- ------- -------
Net income..................................... $3,134 $4,085 $1,890 $5,551
====== ====== ====== ======
BASIC:
Common shares outstanding, net of treasury
shares, beginning of period............... 13,078 13,614 13,464 13,729
Weighted average common shares issued during
period.................................... 3 52 53 130
Weighted average treasury shares repurchased
during period............................. (265) (17) (481) (73)
------ ------ ------ ------
Weighted average common shares outstanding, net
of treasury shares, end of period............ 12,816 13,649 13,036 13,786
====== ====== ====== ======
Net income per common share.................... $ 0.24 $ 0.30 $ 0.14 $ 0.40
====== ====== ====== ======
DILUTED:
Common shares outstanding, net of treasury
shares, beginning of period............... 13,078 13,614 13,464 13,729
Weighted average common shares issued during
period.................................... 3 52 53 130
Weighted average common share equivalents.... 872 620 905 564
Weighted average treasury shares repurchased
during period............................. (265) (17) (481) (73)
------ ------ ------ ------
Weighted average common shares outstanding, net
of treasury shares, end of period............ 13,688 14,269 13,941 14,350
====== ====== ====== ======
Net income per common share.................... $ 0.23 $ 0.29 $ 0.14 $ 0.39
====== ====== ====== ======
NOTE 7 -- RELATED PARTY NOTE RECEIVABLE:
On April 2, 2001, the Company and its Chief Executive Officer (Officer)
entered into a Promissory Note Agreement in the principal amount of
approximately $543. The non-interest bearing note was used by the Officer to
fund the exercise of stock options to purchase 167 common shares of the Company.
The promissory note is due and payable in full on April 2, 2008 or, if earlier,
within twelve months after the Officer's voluntary termination of employment
with the Company. The Officer simultaneously entered into a Stock Pledge
Agreement with the Company pledging the 167 common shares as security for the
promissory note.
NOTE 8 -- BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company has two reportable segments: Consumer Products -- Floorcare and
Consumer Products -- Other. The operations of the Consumer Products -Floorcare
segment includes the design, assembly or sourcing, marketing and distribution of
a full line of plastic and metal vacuum cleaners. The primary brand names
associated with this segment include Dirt Devil and Royal. These products are
sold primarily to major mass merchant retailers and independent dealers in North
America. The operations of the Consumer Products -- Other segment represents
business conducted by Privacy Technologies, Inc. and Product Launch Partners,
Inc., both of
9
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)
which are wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. Currently, the primary
product line within this segment is the TeleZapper, a telephone attachment that
helps reduce unwanted computer-dialed telemarketing calls. These products are
sold primarily to major mass merchant retailers and national electronic chains
in North America. In August of 2002, the Company licensed the TeleZapper
intellectual property to a phone manufacturer for the inclusion in telephones
and answering machines.
The Company's reportable segments are distinguished by the nature of
products sold. The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources to
reportable segments primarily based on net sales and operating income. The
accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described
in Note 1, the accounting policies footnote. The Company records its federal and
state tax assets and liabilities at corporate. There are no intersegment sales.
Financial information for the Company's Reportable Segments consisted of
the following:
THREE MONTHS ENDED NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
------------------- -------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net Sales
Consumer Products -- Floorcare................... $ 82,937 $105,857 $248,953 $288,429
Consumer Products -- Other....................... 8,768 5,646 23,306 5,646
-------- -------- -------- --------
Consolidated Total............................... $ 91,705 $111,503 $272,259 $294,075
======== ======== ======== ========
Income from Operations
Consumer Products -- Floorcare................... $ 901 $ 5,846 $ 157 $ 10,078
Consumer Products -- Other....................... 4,768 1,405 4,360 1,405
-------- -------- -------- --------
Consolidated Total............................... $ 5,669 $ 7,251 $ 4,517 $ 11,483
======== ======== ======== ========
Capital Expenditures
Consumer Products -- Floorcare................... $ 1,586 $ 3,193 $ 4,654 $ 7,613
Consumer Products -- Other....................... 28 63 78 125
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total for Reportable Segments.................... 1,614 3,256 4,732 7,738
Corporate........................................ 143 952 620 4,415
-------- -------- -------- --------
Consolidated Total............................... $ 1,757 $ 4,208 $ 5,352 $ 12,153
======== ======== ======== ========
Depreciation and Amortization
Consumer Products -- Floorcare................... $ 2,523 $ 2,870 $ 9,002 $ 8,821
Consumer Products -- Other....................... 132 100 390 167
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total for Reportable Segments.................... 2,655 2,970 9,392 8,988
Corporate........................................ 1,031 775 3,123 2,073
-------- -------- -------- --------
Consolidated Total............................... $ 3,686 $ 3,745 $ 12,515 $ 11,061
======== ======== ======== ========
Total Assets
Consumer Products -- Floorcare................... $118,849 $140,552 $118,849 $140,552
Consumer Products -- Other....................... 8,211 4,046 8,211 4,046
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total for Reportable Segments.................... 127,060 144,598 127,060 144,598
Corporate........................................ 21,513 19,122 21,513 19,122
-------- -------- -------- --------
Consolidated Total............................... $148,573 $163,720 $148,573 $163,720
======== ======== ======== ========
10
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management's discussion and analysis of its financial position and results
of operations are based upon the Company's consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ
from those estimates. Financial Reporting Release No. 60, which was recently
issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), requires all
registrants, including the Company, to include a discussion of "Critical"
accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements.
Management believes that the critical accounting policies and areas that require
the most significant judgments and estimates to be used in the preparation of
the consolidated financial statements are revenue recognition, including
customer based programs and incentives, allowance for doubtful accounts, useful
lives of tooling and other long lived assets and accrued warranty and customer
returns.
Revenue Recognition -- The Company's revenue recognition policy is to
recognize revenues when products are shipped. The Company's return policy is to
replace, repair or issue credit for product under warranty. Returns received
during the current period are expensed as received and a provision is provided
for estimated future returns and sales agreements with certain customers. The
Company records estimated reductions to net sales for customer programs and
incentive offerings including pricing arrangements, promotions and other volume
based incentives. If market conditions were to soften, the Company may take
actions to increase customer incentives, possibly resulting in a reduction of
net sales and gross margins at the time the incentive is offered. The Company's
revenue recognition policy is in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 101,
"Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements". The Company includes royalty
income from various license agreements in net sales.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts -- The Company maintains an allowance for
trade accounts receivable for which collection on specific customer accounts is
doubtful. In determining collectibility, management reviews available customer
financial statement information, credit rating reports as well as other external
documents and public filings. When it is deemed probable that a specific
customer account is uncollectible, that balance is included in the reserve
calculation. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different
assumptions.
Useful Lives of Tooling -- The Company capitalizes the cost of tooling used
in the production of its products by third party suppliers and global contract
manufacturers. The tooling is depreciated on a straight-line basis over 2-3
years, based on the nature of the product and the estimated product life cycle.
The useful lives are reviewed on a quarterly basis by management and useful
lives may be shortened if needed. In determining whether or not shortening of
useful lives is required, management reviews product sell-through data at
retail, forecasted demand and the timeframe of new product introductions.
Accrued Warranty and Customer Returns -- The Company's return policy is to
replace, repair or issue credit for products under warranty. Returns received
during the current period are expensed as received and a reserve is maintained
for future returns from current shipments. Management calculates the reserve
utilizing historical return rates for each product family. These rates are
reviewed and adjusted periodically. Management utilizes judgment for estimating
return rates of new products and adjusts those estimates as actual results
become available.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net sales decreased 17.8% for the third quarter and decreased 7.4% for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2002, compared with the same periods in
the prior year. The decrease in the third quarter net sales was primarily due to
lower shipments of the Platinum Force line of products which were launched
during the third quarter of 2001, and lower average wholesale prices on
floorcare products, partially offset by an increase in shipments of the
Telezapper, which was also introduced during the third quarter of 2001. The
decrease in net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was primarily
due to lower shipments of carpet extractors and lower average wholesale prices
on floorcare products, partially offset by an increase in shipments of the
TeleZapper. Overall sales to the top 5 customers (all of which are major
retailers) decreased in the first nine
11
months of 2002, both in terms of dollars and as a percentage of total net sales,
accounting for approximately 68.0% as compared with approximately 70.3% in the
first nine months of 2001. The Company believes that its dependence on sales to
its largest customers will continue. Recently, several major retailers have
experienced significant financial difficulties and some, including Kmart and
Ames, have filed for protection from creditors under applicable bankruptcy laws.
As of September 30, 2002, the net exposure related to Kmart and Ames, as well as
other customer balances for which management believes that collection is
doubtful, was included in the calculation of allowance for doubtful accounts.
The Company sells its products to certain customers that are in bankruptcy
proceedings, including Kmart.
Gross margin, as a percent of net sales, decreased from 23.7% for the third
quarter 2001 to 23.0% in the third quarter 2002, and decreased from 21.4% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2001 to 20.5% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2002. The gross margin percentage was negatively affected in 2002
by lower average wholesale selling prices on the Company's floorcare products
due to continued heightened competition. This negative impact on gross margins
was partially offset by favorable TeleZapper margins, lower floorcare product
returns, lower costs on certain products and an adjustment to net sales of
$1,400, for certain sales programs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 19.7% for the third
quarter of 2002 and were consistent for the nine-month period ended September
30, 2002, compared with the same periods in 2001. The decrease in selling,
general and administrative expenses for the third quarter of 2002 was primarily
due to decreases in advertising and promotional expenditures.
Interest expense decreased 37.2% for the third quarter 2002, and decreased
45.1% for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2002 compared to the same
periods in 2001. The decrease in interest expense is the result of lower
effective borrowing rates and lower levels of variable rate borrowings to
finance working capital, capital expenditures and share repurchases.
Receivable securitization and other expense, net, principally reflects the
effect of the cost of the Company's trade accounts receivable securitization
program and foreign currency transaction gains or losses related to the
Company's North American assets.
Due to the factors discussed above, the Company had income before income
taxes for the third quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2002 of
$4,810 and $2,886, respectively, compared to income before taxes for the third
quarter and nine month period ended September 30, 2001 of $6,227 and $8,521,
respectively.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company used net cash generated from operations and bank borrowings to
fund its capital expenditures and share repurchases. Working capital was $48,245
at September 30, 2002, an increase of 48.1% over December 31, 2001. Current
assets increased by $14,158 reflecting in part an increase in trade accounts
receivable of $2,014, an increase in inventory of $12,307, and a $1,433 increase
in prepaid expenses and other, partially offset by a decrease in cash of $1,143.
Current liabilities decreased by $1,521, reflecting in part a $3,399 decrease in
accrued advertising and promotion, a $2,409 decrease in accrued salaries,
benefits, and payroll taxes, a $750 decrease in accrued warranty and customer
returns, a $791 decrease in accrued other, partially offset by an increase of
$6,306 in accounts payable. Inventories have increased, as well as accounts
payable related to inventory purchases, in order to meet seasonal demand.
In the first nine months of 2002, the Company utilized $5,352 of cash for
capital expenditures, including approximately $1,100 of tooling related to a new
bagged upright, approximately $650 of tooling for new metal uprights and
approximately $1,600 of tooling for various other floorcare products.
At September 30, 2002, the Company has a collateralized revolving credit
facility with availability of up to $70,000 and a maturity date of April 1,
2005. Under the agreement, pricing options of the bank's base lending rate and
LIBOR rate are based on a defined formula. In addition, the Company pays a
commitment fee based on a defined formula on the unused portion of the facility.
The revolving credit facility contains covenants, which require, among other
things, the achievement of minimum net worth levels and the maintenance of
certain financial ratios. The Company was in compliance with all applicable
covenants as of September 30, 2002. The revolving credit facility is
collateralized by the assets of the Company. As long as the Company remains in
compliance with all covenants, the revolving credit facility permits share
repurchases and dividends based on a defined formula up to $18,369 as of
September 30, 2002.
12
The Company also utilizes a revolving trade accounts receivable
securitization program to sell without recourse, through a wholly-owned
subsidiary, certain trade accounts receivable. Under the program, the maximum
amount allowed to be sold at any given time is $30,000, seasonally adjusted to
$35,000 from September to December. At September 30, 2002, the Company had
received approximately $18,100 from the sale of trade accounts receivable that
have not yet been collected. The proceeds from the sales were used to reduce
borrowings under the Company's revolving credit facility. Costs of the program,
which primarily consist of the purchaser's financing cost of issuing commercial
paper backed by the receivables, totaled $584 and $877 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and have been classified as
"Receivable securitization and other expense, net" in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company, as agent for the purchaser
of the receivables, retains collection and administrative responsibilities for
the purchased receivables. The Company is required to maintain certain financial
ratios associated with the receivables included within the program. The current
program with the existing provider will be terminated in January 2003 and be
replaced by another provider. The terms and conditions of the new agreement are
substantially the same as the current program.
In April 2001, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a common share
repurchase program that provides for the Company to purchase, in the open market
and through negotiated transactions, up to 3,400 of its outstanding common
shares. As of November 13, 2002, the Company has repurchased approximately 1,322
shares for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $6,900 under the program
that is scheduled to expire in December 2002.
The Company believes that its revolving credit facilities along with cash
generated by operations will be sufficient to provide for the Company's
anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the next
twelve months, as well as any additional stock repurchases under the current
repurchase program.
QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS
The following table presents certain unaudited consolidated quarterly
operating information for the Company and includes all adjustments (consisting
only of normal recurring adjustments) that the Company considers necessary for a
fair presentation of such information for the interim periods. Certain prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation
(See Note 1 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
THREE MONTHS ENDED
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SEPT. 30, JUNE 30, MARCH 31, DEC. 31, SEPT. 30, JUNE 30, MARCH 31,
2002 2002 2002 2001 2001 2001 2001
--------- -------- --------- -------- --------- -------- ---------
Net sales........................ $91,705 $89,390 $91,164 $127,236 $111,503 $79,512 $103,060
Gross margin..................... 21,086 16,344 18,348 32,663 26,461 15,269 21,172
Net income (loss)................ 3,134 (1,329) 85 3,773 4,085 (708) 2,174
Net income (loss) per share --
diluted (a).................... $ 0.23 $ (0.10) $ 0.01 $ 0.27 $ 0.29 $ (0.05) $ 0.15
---------------
(a) The sum of 2001 quarterly net income (loss) per common share does not equal
annual net income per common share due to the change in the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding due to share repurchases.
The Company believes that a significant percentage of certain of its
products are given as gifts and therefore, sell in larger volumes during the
Christmas and other holiday shopping seasons. The Company's continued dependency
on its major customers, the timing of purchases by these major customers and the
timing of new product introductions cause quarterly fluctuations in the
Company's net sales. As a consequence, results in prior quarters are not
necessarily indicative of future results of operations.
OTHER
The Company's Consumer Products -- Floorcare business segment's most
significant competitors are Hoover, Eureka and Bissell in the upright vacuum and
carpet shampooer markets and, Black & Decker and Euro Pro in the hand-held
market. Many of these competitors and several others are subsidiaries or
divisions of companies that are more diversified and have greater financial
resources than the Company. The Company believes that the domestic vacuum
cleaner industry is a mature industry with modest annual growth in many of its
13
products but with a decline in certain other products. Competition is dependent
upon price, quality, extension of product lines, and advertising and promotion
expenditures. Additionally, competition is influenced by innovation in the
design of replacement models and by marketing and approaches to distribution.
The Company experiences extensive competition, including price pressure and new
advertising and new product offerings from its competitors, in all product lines
within the Consumer Products -- Floorcare segment. These trends are expected to
continue.
The Company's Consumer Products -- Other business segment competes with a
variety of other consumer products and services. In addition to various state
"do not call" lists, the Federal Trade Commission is proposing a national "do
not call" list that may have an impact on the sales of the TeleZapper. In August
2002, the Company licensed the TeleZapper intellectual property to a phone
manufacturer for the inclusion in telephones and answering machines.
INFLATION
The Company does not believe that inflation by itself has had a material
effect on the Company's results of operations. However, as the Company
experiences price increases from its suppliers, which may include increases due
to inflation, retail pressures may prevent the Company from increasing its
prices.
LITIGATION
The Hoover Company (Hoover) filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the
Northern District of Ohio (case #1:00cv 0347), against the Company on February
4, 2000, under the patent, trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United
States. The Complaint asserted that the Company's Dirt Devil Easy Steamer
infringed three utility patents and two design patents held by Hoover, and also
that the Easy Steamer design infringed the trade dress of Hoover's carpet
extractor products. The Court had dismissed charges of infringement against
Royal regarding one of the three utility patents, and found that the Dirt Devil
Easy Steamer infringed one claim of a second utility patent. The Company filed a
lawsuit in federal court, in the Northern District of Ohio (case #1:01cv 2775),
against The Hoover Company (Hoover) on December 10, 2001, under the patent,
trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United States. The Complaint
asserted that Hoover infringed certain patents relating to bagless technology
held by the Company. On October 17, 2002, the Company and Hoover reached a
settlement of all patent-related litigation described above. Hoover has granted
rights to the Company with regard to its existing carpet extractor patents. The
Company has granted rights to Hoover with regard to its existing bagless upright
vacuum cleaner patents. The settlement includes cash payments to the Company.
The Company filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the Northern District of
Ohio (case #1:02cv 0338), against Bissell Homecare, Inc. (Bissell) on February
22, 2002, under the patent, trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United
States. The Complaint asserts that Bissell infringes certain patents relating to
bagless technology held by the Company. The Company seeks damages, injunction on
future production, and legal fees.
Bissell Homecare, Inc. (Bissell) filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the
Eastern District of Michigan (case #02cv71079), against the Company on March 20,
2002, under the patent, trademark, and unfair competition laws of the United
States. On April 25, 2002, the Company filed a motion to transfer the case from
the Eastern District of Michigan to the Northern District of Ohio. On June 19,
2002, the Court transferred the case (now #1:02cv 1358) to the Northern District
of Ohio. The Complaint asserts that the Company's Dirt Devil Easy Steamer and
Platinum Force Extractor products infringe certain design and utility patents
held by Bissell. Bissell seeks damages, injunction on future production, and
legal fees. The Company is vigorously defending the suit and believes it is
without merit. If Bissell were to prevail on all its claims, it could have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows of the Company.
The Company filed a lawsuit in federal court, in the Northern District of
Ohio (case #1:02cv 1127), against White Consolidated, Ltd. (Eureka) on June 14,
2002, under the patent, trademark and unfair competition laws of the United
Sates. The Complaint asserts that Eureka infringes certain patents relating to
bagless technology held by the Company. The Company seeks damages, injunction on
future production, and legal fees.
The Company is involved in various other claims and litigation arising in
the normal course of business. The Company has product liability and general
liability insurance policies in amounts management believes to be reasonable.
There can be no assurance, however, that such insurance will be adequate to
cover all potential product or other liability claims against the Company. In
the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of
14
these actions will not materially affect the consolidated financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In fiscal 2001, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") issued EITF No.
00-14, "Accounting for Certain Sales Incentives," and EITF No. 00-25, "Vendor
Income Statement Characterization of Consideration to a Purchaser of the
Vendor's Products or Services" (both of which were clarified by EITF 01-09
"Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer"). These
pronouncements address the recognition, measurement and statement of operations
classification for certain sales incentives and are effective January 1, 2002.
The Company adopted these pronouncements in the first quarter of fiscal 2002 and
as a result certain items previously included in selling, general and
administrative expenses were reclassified as a reduction of net sales.
Additionally, prior period amounts were reclassified to conform to the new
requirements. The impact of these two issues resulted in a reduction of net
sales of $1,378 and $1,223 for the quarters ended September 30, 2002 and 2001,
respectively and $2,967 and $3,620 for the nine-month periods ended September
30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. These amounts, consisting principally of
promotional allowances to the Company's retail customers, were previously
recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses; therefore, there was
no impact to net income for either period.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Forward-looking statements in this release are made pursuant to the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such
forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements
which speak only as of the date hereof. Potential risks and uncertainties
include, but are not limited to: the financial strength of the retail industry
particularly in the major mass retail channel; the impact of Kmart's recent
bankruptcy filing on Royal's future sales and earnings; the competitive pricing
and aggressive product development environment within the floorcare industry;
the impact of private-label programs by mass retailers; the cost and
effectiveness of planned advertising, marketing and promotional campaigns; the
success at retail and the continued acceptance by consumers of the Company's new
products, the dependence upon the Company's ability to continue to successfully
develop and introduce innovative products; the uncertainty of the Company's
global supply chain and suppliers to continuously supply sourced finished goods
and component parts; including interruptions from potential port work stopages,
and general business and economic conditions.
15
PART II -- OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There were no material changes in information about market risk than that
provided in the 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company maintains a system of controls and procedures designed to
provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of the financial statements
and other disclosures included in this report, as well as to safeguard assets
from unauthorized use or disposition. The Company evaluated the effectiveness of
the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures under
supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company's
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to
material information required to be included in the Company's periodic
Securities and Exchange Commission filings. No significant changes were made to
the Company's internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect
these controls subsequent to the date of evaluation.
ITEM 6 EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
The Exhibits filed herewith are set forth on the Index to Exhibits filed as
part of this report.
Forms 8-K -- None
The following documents are furnished as an exhibit and numbered pursuant
to Item 601 of Regulation S-K:
None
16
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
--------------------------------------
(Registrant)
MICHAEL J. MERRIMAN
--------------------------------------
Michael J. Merriman
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 13, 2002 /S/ RICHARD G. VASEK
--------------------------------------
Richard G. Vasek
Chief Financial Officer, Vice
President - Finance
and Secretary (Principal Financial
Officer)
17
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
I, Michael J. Merriman, the Chief Executive Officer and President of Royal
Appliance Mfg. Co. (the "Company"), certify that to the best of my knowledge,
based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002 of the Company (the "Report"):
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
/s/ MICHAEL J. MERRIMAN
---------------------------------------------------------
Michael J. Merriman,
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
Chief Executive Officer and President
November 13, 2002
18
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
I, Richard G. Vasek, Chief Financial Officer of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. (the
"Company") certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 of the
Company (the "Report"):
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
/s/ RICHARD G. VASEK
---------------------------------------------------------
Richard G. Vasek,
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2002
19
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. 78M(A) OR 78O(D)
(SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
I, Michael J. Merriman, the Chief Executive Officer and President of Royal
Appliance Mfg. Co. (the "Company"), certify that:
(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company;
(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;
(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;
(4) The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and we
have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;
(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
(c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
(5) The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit
committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):
(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
internal controls; and
(6) The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
/s/ MICHAEL J. MERRIMAN
---------------------------------------------------------
Michael J. Merriman,
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
Chief Executive Officer and President
November 13, 2002
20
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. 78M(A) OR 78O(D)
(SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
I, Richard G. Vasek, the Chief Financial Officer of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
(the "Company"), certify that:
(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company;
(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;
(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;
(4) The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and we
have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;
(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
(c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
(5) The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit
committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):
(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
internal controls; and
(6) The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
/s/ RICHARD G. VASEK
---------------------------------------------------------
Richard G. Vasek,
Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2002
21
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
PAGE NUMBER
-----------
None
22
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
FOR SPECIAL MEETING ON APRIL 22, 2003
The Special Meeting of Shareholders of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. will be held on
Tuesday, April 22, 2003 at 9:00 a.m. at The Forum Conference Center, One
Cleveland Center, 1375 East Ninth Street, Cleveland, Ohio.
[Royal Applicance Logo][DIRT DEVIL LOGO]
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
Please sign, date and return your proxy/voting instruction card below. Detach
and return the card in the envelope provided.
DETACH CARD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ROYAL APPLIANCE MFG. CO.
The undersigned hereby appoints Michael J. Merriman and R. Louis Schneeberger,
and each of them, as proxies with full power of substitution for and in the name
of the undersigned, to vote the Common Shares of Royal Appliance Mfg. Co. (the
"Company") held of record by the undersigned on February 28, 2003 at the Special
Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 22, 2003, at The Forum Conference
Center, One Cleveland Center, 1375 East Ninth Street, Cleveland, Ohio, at 9:00
a.m. local time, and at any adjournment thereof, with all the powers the
undersigned would possess if personally present.
The proxies shall vote in the manner indicated on this proxy card. The proxies
will vote "FOR" Proposals 1 and 2 if no direction is made. The proxies cannot
vote your shares unless you sign, date, and return this proxy card. If you wish
to vote as the Board of Directors recommends, all you need to do is sign and
return this card.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSALS 1 AND 2.
1. To adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 16, 2002 by
and among the Company, TechTronic Industries Co., Ltd., a corporation
organized under the laws of Hong Kong, RAMC Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of TechTronic, and TIC Acquisition
Corp., an Ohio corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of RAMC Holdings,
and approve the transactions contemplated thereby, including, without
limitation, the merger pursuant to which each Royal share is converted
into the right to receive $7.37 per share.
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN
(CONTINUED, AND TO BE SIGNED ON OTHER SIDE)
DETACH CARD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Continued from the other side)
2. Unless discretionary authority is withheld, the proxies are authorized to
vote, in their discretion, upon other matters as may be properly brought
before the Special Meeting, including in favor of a proposal to postpone
or adjourn the Special Meeting in order to solicit additional votes.
[ ] DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY GRANTED [ ] DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY WITHHELD
[ ] Please check this box if you expect to attend the special meeting in
person.
All as more particularly described in the Proxy Statement relating to such
meeting, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged.
Dated................, 2003
...........................
Signature
...........................
Signature
Please sign exactly as
name(s) appear on this
proxy. If joint account,
each joint owner should
sign. When signing as
attorney, executor,
administrator, trustee, or
guardian, please give your
full title. If the
shareholder is a
corporation or partnership,
please have the full
corporate or partnership
name signed by a duly
authorized person.
THIS PROXY, IF PROPERLY EXECUTED AND DELIVERED, WILL REVOKE ALL PRIOR PROXIES.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN YOUR PROXY PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE TO
NATIONAL CITY BANK,
P.O. BOX 92301, CLEVELAND, OHIO 44197-1200. NO POSTAGE REQUIRED IF MAILED IN THE
UNITED STATES.