Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x Quarterly |
|
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002
OR
¨ Transition |
|
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission File Number: 0-30925
BLUE MARTINI SOFTWARE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
94-3319751 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
2600 Campus Drive
San Mateo, California 94403
(Address of principal executive offices)
Telephone Number (650) 356-4000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days: Yes x No ¨
As of April 29, 2002 there were approximately 73,992,000 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding.
INDEX
|
|
|
|
Page No.
|
|
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
Item 2. |
|
|
|
9 |
Item 3. |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
|
|
25 |
Item 6. |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
26 |
BLUE MARTINI SOFTWARE, INC.
(In thousands, except per share data)
ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
March 31, 2002
|
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash of $7,068 in 2002 and $2,399 in 2001 |
|
$ |
20,183 |
|
|
$ |
12,945 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
68,684 |
|
|
|
84,554 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
4,930 |
|
|
|
5,558 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
95,740 |
|
|
|
105,427 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
3,573 |
|
|
|
4,654 |
|
Intangible assets and other, net |
|
|
11,174 |
|
|
|
12,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
110,487 |
|
|
$ |
122,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,176 |
|
|
|
1,848 |
|
Accrued employee compensation |
|
|
6,423 |
|
|
|
6,354 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
4,755 |
|
|
|
6,696 |
|
Deferred revenues |
|
|
4,242 |
|
|
|
5,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
16,596 |
|
|
|
19,959 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, authorized 5,000 shares, issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and outstanding 69,384 shares in 2002 and 68,964 shares in 2001 |
|
|
249,904 |
|
|
|
254,014 |
|
Deferred stock compensation |
|
|
(4,624 |
) |
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(151,401 |
) |
|
|
(144,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
93,891 |
|
|
|
102,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
110,487 |
|
|
$ |
122,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
BLUE MARTINI SOFTWARE, INC.
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License |
|
$ |
1,029 |
|
|
$ |
8,023 |
|
Service |
|
|
7,480 |
|
|
|
13,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
8,509 |
|
|
|
21,395 |
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License |
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
Service* |
|
|
5,222 |
|
|
|
13,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
5,843 |
|
|
|
14,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
7,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing* |
|
|
6,931 |
|
|
|
15,518 |
|
Research and development* |
|
|
3,545 |
|
|
|
6,203 |
|
General and administrative* |
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
4,116 |
|
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
|
(2,018 |
) |
|
|
7,038 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
2,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
10,797 |
|
|
|
34,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(8,131 |
) |
|
|
(27,912 |
) |
Interest income and other, net |
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(7,254 |
) |
|
$ |
(25,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per common share |
|
|
66,940 |
|
|
|
62,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Amounts exclude amortization of deferred stock compensation as follows: |
Cost of service revenues: $58 in 2002 and $1,612 in 2001
Sales and marketing: $(476) in 2002 and $1,369 in 2001
Research and development: $204 in 2002 and $1,188 in 2001
General and administrative: $(1,804) in 2002 and $2,869 in 2001
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated
financial statements.
4
BLUE MARTINI SOFTWARE, INC.
(In thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(7,254 |
) |
|
$ |
(25,705 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property and equipment and amortization of intangible and other assets |
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
3,040 |
|
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
|
(2,018 |
) |
|
|
7,038 |
|
Non-cash restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,107 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
(769 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued employee compensation and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other current liabilities |
|
|
(2,515 |
) |
|
|
(3,177 |
) |
Deferred revenues |
|
|
(819 |
) |
|
|
(4,729 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(9,257 |
) |
|
|
(20,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(2,898 |
) |
Purchase of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,250 |
) |
Sales and maturities of short-term investments |
|
|
35,721 |
|
|
|
66,107 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(20,404 |
) |
|
|
(50,733 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
15,242 |
|
|
|
8,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
3,111 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7,238 |
|
|
|
(9,054 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
12,945 |
|
|
|
40,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
20,183 |
|
|
$ |
31,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
BLUE MARTINI SOFTWARE, INC.
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements. In the opinion of management all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three-months period ended March 31, 2002 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year ended December 31, 2002.
The balance sheet at
December 31, 2001 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further
information refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Blue Martini Software, Inc. (Blue Martini or the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Reclassifications
The 2001 financial information has been reclassified to conform to the 2002 presentation in three respects: (1) revenues and cost of revenues have been reclassified in accordance with EITF Topic D-103, to reflect
certain out-of-pocket expenses reimbursed by customers as revenues versus an offset to the related expense. The impact was an increase to both service revenues and cost of service revenues of $866,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2001; (2)
amortization of deferred stock compensation, previously included in cost of revenues, sales and marketing, research and development, and general and administrative expenses, is now presented as a separate line item as part of operating expenses; and
(3) accrued interest receivable related to short-term investments, previously reported as part of other current assets, has been reclassified and is now reported as part of short-term investments. The impact of reclassification of accrued interest
receivables at December 31, 2001 was $1,815,000.
Note 2. Restructuring Charges
In January 2002, the Company implemented a restructuring plan to preserve cash and reduce costs. The restructuring consisted of terminating approximately 30 employees. The action
resulted in a net restructuring charge of $703,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2002 related to severance payments to terminated employees. The following table summarized the January 2002 restructuring charge and activities related to accrued
restructuring charges (in thousands):
|
|
Accrued at December 31, 2001
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Cash Payments
|
|
|
Accrued at March 31, 2002
|
Lease cancellations |
|
$ |
458 |
|
$ |
(83 |
) |
|
$ |
(375 |
) |
|
$ |
|
Severance and related charges |
|
|
18 |
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
(804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
$ |
(1,179 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 3. Comprehensive Loss
The comprehensive loss was $(7,837) and $(25,214) for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The difference between net loss and comprehensive loss is primarily
due to unrealized gain or loss on available-for-sale investments.
6
BLUE MARTINI SOFTWARE, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
Note 4. Net Loss Per Common Share
The following potential common shares have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share for all periods presented because the effect would have been
anti-dilutive (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
Shares issuable under stock options |
|
11,229 |
|
11,083 |
Shares of restricted stock subject to repurchase |
|
1,877 |
|
7,116 |
Shares issuable pursuant to warrants |
|
2,528 |
|
2,445 |
Note 5. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company adopted as of January 1, 2002 the provisions of SFAS No.142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The adoption of this
new standard did not affect the Companys consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead be tested at least annually for impairment
and that intangible assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and periodically reviewed for impairment.
The Company adopted as of January 1, 2002 the provisions of SFAS No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The adoption of this new
standard did not affect the Companys consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets.
The Company adopted as of January 1, 2002 the provisions of EITF Topic D-103, Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for out-of-pocket Expense
Incurred. The impact of adoption of EITF Topic D-103 was an increase to both revenues and costs of revenues by the amounts of reimbursable out-of pocket expenses for all periods presented. See Note 1 Reclassifications.
Note 6. Contingency
The Company is engaged in certain legal actions initiated in 2001 related to the stock allocation practices of the underwriters of the Companys initial public offering. The Company believes that it has adequate legal defenses and that
the ultimate outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position and results of operations.
Note
7. Subsequent Events
On April 16, 2002, the Company announced the acquisition of Cybrant Corporation, a provider
of configuration, pricing, quoting, guided selling and solution design applications in a stock for stock transaction. Under the terms of the acquisition agreement, the Company issued approximately 4.5 million shares of its common stock to purchase
all of Cybrant Corporations stock.
The purchase price is approximately $8 million, comprising the shares issued and costs
related to the transaction and minimal exit activities. The purchase price will be allocated to assets and liabilities acquired, based on a valuation analysis which the Company will complete in the second quarter of 2002.
On May 3, 2002, Blue Martini was notified that a shareholders derivative complaint was to be filed in Superior Court of the State of California,
County of San Mateo, under the caption Richard D. Yager, derivatively on behalf of Blue Martini Software, Inc., v. Zweben et al. The complaint provided to the Company purports to be
7
BLUE MARTINI SOFTWARE, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
filed on behalf of Blue Martini, names as defendants Blue Martini (as a nominal defendant), certain Blue Martini officers and directors, and Goldman Sachs, the managing underwriter of Blue
Martinis initial public offering, or IPO. The complaint alleges that the defendants breached fiduciary and other duties, were negligent, and were unjustly enriched because the IPO price of Blue Martinis stock allegedly was set too low.
The plaintiff seeks unspecified monetary damages and other relief. Similar complaints have been filed in California state Courts against other public companies that conducted IPOs of their common stock in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The Company
believes that the lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend against it vigorously. The Company believes that the ultimate outcome of this action will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position and results of operations.
8
The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of Blue Martini Software, Inc. (the Company) should be read in conjunction with the Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. This quarterly report on Form 10-Q
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements using terminology such as can,
may, believe, designated to, will, expect, plan, anticipate, estimate, potential, or continue, or the negative thereof or other
comparable terminology regarding beliefs, plans, expectations or intentions regarding the future. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking
statements. All forward-looking statements and risk factors included in this document are made as of the date hereof, based on information available to the Company as of the date thereof, and the Company assumes no obligation to update any
forward-looking statement or risk factors.
Overview
We compete in the Customer Relationship Management, or CRM market and provide enterprise software applications and services that enable companies to market and sell more profitably. Our revenues are derived from the
licensing of our application suite and the sale of related services. The license agreement for our application suite typically provides for an initial fee to use the software in perpetuity. Service revenues are principally derived from consulting
services, technical support and training. Our maintenance agreements entitle customers to receive software updates, maintenance releases and technical support and typically have a one-year term. Maintenance is typically payable in advance.
Consulting services and training are typically sold on a time-and-materials basis.
We market our application suite primarily
through a direct sales force with support from resellers. We also engage in alliances with systems integrators and technology vendors to assist us in marketing and selling our application suite and related services. A majority of our customers use
systems integrators to implement our product, and systems integrators are a significant influence in our customers purchasing decisions. We primarily target our products to the manufacturing and retail industries but have also delivered
solutions to customers in a wide range of industries, including education, energy, healthcare, pharmaceuticals and telecommunications. As of March 31, 2002, we had licensed our application suite to over 100 customers worldwide.
While our revenues to date have been derived principally from customers in the United States, international revenues accounted for 24% of our
revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2002. We believe international revenues will represent a significant portion of our total revenues in the future but may fluctuate as a percentage of revenues in the near term. Although we have a limited
operating history, our quarterly operating results have experienced seasonal fluctuations in the past. Quarterly results fluctuate based on several factors, including our customers fiscal year, budgeting cycles, sales incentive plans, slow
summer purchasing patterns and general economic conditions in markets where we conduct business.
To date, we have derived a
significant portion of our revenues from a small number of customers. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2002. While we do not anticipate that any one customer will represent
more than 10% of total revenues in 2002, we do expect that a limited number of customers will continue to account for a substantial portion of our license revenues in a given quarter. The loss of a major potential customer or the delay or
cancellation of anticipated significant license contracts would adversely affect our revenues and operating results in a particular quarterly period. Failure to obtain a significant number of new customers or additional orders from existing
customers in any period would adversely affect our business and operating results.
9
We believe that, to be successful, we must expand our customer base, grow our relationships
with consulting and system integrator partners, and continue to enhance our application suite. Our operating expenses are based in part on our expectations of future revenues over the long term, and are largely fixed in the short term. As such, a
delay in completion of new customer license contracts or the recognition of revenues from one or more license contracts could cause significant variations in our operating results from quarter to quarter and could result in net losses in a given
quarter being greater than expected.
Recent Developments
On April 16, 2002, we announced the acquisition of Cybrant Corporation, a provider of configuration, pricing, quoting, guided selling and solution design applications in an all-stock
deal. Under the terms of the acquisition agreement, the Company issued approximately 4.5 million shares of its common stock to purchase all of Cybrant Corporations stock.
The purchase price is approximately $8 million, comprising the shares issued and costs related to the transaction and minimal exit activities. The purchase price will be allocated to
assets and liabilities acquired, based on a valuation analysis which the Company will complete in the second quarter of 2002. The Companys financial statements as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 do not reflect the impact of the
acquisition of Cybrant. The operating results of Cybrant will be included with the Companys results beginning with the date of acquisition. We expect that the impact of the Cybrant acquisition will include (1) charges for in-process research
and development expenses in the second quarter of 2002, (2) increases to operating costs and expenses beginning in the second quarter of 2002, reflecting the additional personnel and activities from the Cybrant acquisition as well as integration
activities in the second quarter of 2002, (3) additional deferred stock compensation and resulting amortization, (4) recording of amortizable intangible assets and related amortization, and (5) potentially recording of non-amortizable intangible
assets including goodwill
Results of Operations
Revenues
License. License revenues decreased to $1.0 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2002 from $8.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2001 due to a decrease in the number of transactions recognized and in the average size of license transactions.
We believe that the decrease in licenses to new customers is due in part to the global economic conditions that developed in 2001 and continue today. These economic conditions have
resulted in decreased information technology spending by companies in our target markets; in particular, in 2001 we experienced an increase in the average length of our sales cycles and a marked decrease in the average size of license transactions
as compared to 2000. These large sales cycles continued into 2002. We believe that the decrease in average size of license transactions is due partly to our offering of CPU-based pricing, as CPU-based license transactions are generally smaller in
size than enterprise transactions while offering greater possibility for follow-on licensing, and partly to competitive pricing pressure. During 2002, the future direction of the overall domestic and global economies will have a significant impact
on our overall performance; in view of that, we anticipate that our license revenues will remain depressed for the second quarter and then trend upwards.
Service. Service revenues decreased to $7.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 from $13.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2001. The decrease was
primarily due to a sequential reduction in the number of license contracts signed in the preceding quarters, which resulted in a decrease in the number of customers under consulting service engagements and customer maintenance agreements, as well as
a decrease in training revenues. We expect that our service revenues will continue to fluctuate. During 2001 and the quarter ended March 31, 2002, we experienced pricing pressures caused in part by rate reductions by many system integrators and
other third-party service providers as well as our competing vendors. We expect these pricing pressures to continue.
10
The Company adopted the provisions of EITF Topic D-103 as of January 1, 2002. The Company is
now reporting reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses as service revenues for all periods presented. This reclassification amounted to $866,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2001, and increased both service revenues and cost of service
revenues for the period.
Cost of Revenues
License. Cost of license revenues consists of royalties payable to third parties and amortization of purchased intangibles for software that is either embedded in or bundled with
our products. Cost of license revenues decreased to $621,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2002 from $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2001. These amounts represented 60% and 15% of license revenues for the three months ended
March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The decrease in cost of license revenues in absolute dollar terms was due to the reduction in license revenues resulting in decreased royalties payable to third parties. The increase in terms of percentage of
license revenues is due to the fixed amortization of purchased intangibles.Our cost of licenses, when expressed in absolute dollar terms, will be impacted by our license revenues. To the extent license revenues increase (or decrease), we expect cost
of license revenues to increase (or decrease) in absolute dollars but to decline (increase) as a percentage of license revenues as a result of relatively fixed amortization of purchased intangibles.
Service. Cost of service revenues consists primarily of salaries and other personnel-related expenses, costs of
services provided by third party consultants engaged by the company, allocated overhead costs, and depreciation of equipment used to provide consulting services, technical support and training. Allocated overhead costs for costs of services and
other expense categories include facilities, information systems, and other corporate infrastructure costs. Cost of service revenues decreased to $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 from $13.1 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2001. These amounts represented 70% and 98% of service revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The decrease in absolute dollars was primarily due to the reduction in force and other cost-saving actions
implemented in March 2001, July 2001 and January 2002. Because our cost of service revenues are relatively fixed, our cost of services, when expressed as a percentage of related service revenues, may fluctuate in the near term, based primarily our
related service revenues. We expect cost of service revenues to increase in the second quarter of 2002, reflecting the additional personnel and activities related to the Cybrant acquisition.
Operating Expenses
Sales and
Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, and other personnel-related expenses associated with our direct sales and marketing personnel, allocated overhead costs, and costs of
marketing programs including trade shows, advertisements, promotional activities and media events. Sales and marketing expenses decreased to $6.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 from $15.5 million for the same period in 2001. The
decrease was primarily due to lower spending on marketing and advertising programs, and lower personnel related expenses resulting from our reduction in force and other cost-saving actions implemented in 2001 and January 2002. Sales and marketing
expenses differ from one another in that marketing expense, which consists primarily of personnel-related expenses, marketing programs, and travel expenses, generally does not vary significantly based on our license revenues. Sales expense, which
has a relatively larger commission component, does vary based on our license revenues, while remaining relatively fixed as a percentage of those revenues. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase in the second quarter of 2002, reflecting
the additional personnel and activities related to the Cybrant acquisition.
Research and
Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and other personnel-related expenses for engineering personnel, allocated overhead costs, costs of contractors, and depreciation of equipment
used in the development of our software products. To date, all costs related to the development of our software have been expensed as incurred.
11
Research and development expenses decreased to $3.5 million for the three months ended March
31, 2002 from $6.2 million for the same period in 2001. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in personnel-related expenses resulting from reduction in force and other cost-saving actions implemented in 2001 and January 2002. The Company
continues to invest in the research and development of our products, recognizing the importance of maintaining our competitive advantage; research and development expenses increased as a percent of total costs and expenses in the three months ended
March 31, 2002, as compared to the same period in 2001, although in dollar terms such expenses decreased. We expect research and development expenses to increase in the second quarter of 2002, reflecting the additional personnel and activities
related to the Cybrant acquisition.
General and Administrative. General and administrative
expenses include costs associated with our finance, human resources, legal, and other administrative functions. These costs consist principally of salaries and other personnel-related expenses, professional fees, provision for doubtful accounts,
equipment depreciation, and allocated overhead costs. General and administrative expenses decreased to $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 from $4.1 million for the same period in 2001. The decrease was primarily due to the
reduction in force and other cost-saving actions implemented in 2001 and January 2002, which resulted in a decrease in expenses for administrative personnel and related activities. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in the
second quarter of 2002, reflecting integration activities related to the Cybrant acquisition.
Restructuring
Charges. In January 2002, the Company implemented a restructuring plan to preserve cash and reduce costs. The restructuring consisted of terminating approximately 30 employees. The action resulted in a net
restructuring charge of $703,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2002 related to severance payments to terminated employees.
Amortization of Deferred Stock Compensation. Net amortization of deferred stock compensation expense resulted in a credit of $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 as compared to a charge
of $7.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2001. The credit was the result of the effects of forfeitures of unvested stock options and the corresponding adjustment of the amortization of deferred stock compensation that was amortized on an
accelerated basis. Net amortization of deferred stock compensation consists of the amortization of deferred stock compensation using the accelerated method, net of an adjustment for terminated employees during the quarter that reverses previously
recognized expenses calculated on the accelerated method and records the expense on the straight-line method. This adjustment resulted in a credit of $3.6 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
At March 31, 2002, the unamortized deferred stock compensation balance was $4.6 million. This amount will be amortized through
2004.
Interest Income and Other, Net
Interest income and other, net consists primarily of interest income from cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale short-term investments. Interest income and other, net decreased to $877,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2002 from $2.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2001. The decrease was due primarily to lower interest rates as well as lower balances of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments during the quarter ended March
31, 2002. We expect interest income to decrease as the amount of cash and cash equivalents available for investment decreases as cash is used in operations. In addition, due to current prevailing interest rates, reinvestment of maturing marketable
securities is expected to generate lower interest income.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of March 31, 2002, cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $88.9 million, compared to $97.5 million as of December 31, 2001. Net cash used in operating
activities was $9.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002, of which $8.1 million was used for on going operations, and $1.2 million was used for
12
payments for restructuring activities. The net cash used in operating activities was primarily attributable to net losses and a decrease in current liabilities partially offset by other working
capital changes. For the three months ended in March 31, 2001, net cash used in operating activities was $20.3 million.
For the
first three months of 2002, net cash provided from investing activities was $15.2 million primarily due to maturities of our available-for-sale investments portfolio. For the first three months of 2001, net cash provided by investing activities was
$8.2 million principally due to maturities of our available-for-sale investments portfolio, partially offset by purchase of intangible assets and property and equipment. The cash outlay associated with non-recurring payments relating to the
acquisition of Cybrant Corporation is expected to be approximately $2.5 million in the second quarter of 2002. The cash outlay includes payments of capital lease obligations assumed in the acquisition, the minimal exit cost and the transaction
costs.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and $3.0 million
for the comparable period in 2001. The cash provided by financing activities for both periods was principally related to proceeds from shares issued under our employee stock plans.
Our liquidity, capital resources and results of operations in any period could be impacted by the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants and issuance of our common stock
under employee stock purchase plan. Further, our per share results of operations could also be impacted by the increased number of outstanding shares. However, we cannot predict the timing or amount of proceeds from the exercise of these securities,
if they are exercised at all.
We expect that for the foreseeable future, our operating expenses and planned capital
expenditures will constitute a significant use of our cash balances. In addition, we may use cash to fund acquisitions or invest in other businesses, technologies or product lines. We currently anticipate that our existing cash and investments will
be sufficient to meet our presently anticipated working capital, capital expenditure and our operating requirements for at least the next 12 months.Either within this time period or at some future date, we may seek to raise additional funds through
public or private debt or equity financing. There can be no assurance that this additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on reasonable terms and not dilutive to our stockholders. If adequate funds are not available on
acceptable terms, we would have to accept financing on terms we view as unreasonable or that are dilutive to our stockholders, or to cease operations. If we were to seek additional financing today, we do not believe it would be available on
reasonable terms.
The existence or even the anticipation of an uncertain economic environment by potential customers in the
markets in which we operate has affected the demand for our applications, caused pricing pressures for our products, increased customer requests for extended payment terms, and substantially reduced our sales activity during 2001 and the first
quarter of 2002, and may continue to do so in future periods, which could in turn affect our liquidity.
Contingent Matters
Refer to Notes 6 and 7 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of legal contingencies.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The
Company adopted as of January 1, 2002 the provisions of SFAS No.142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The adoption of this new standard did not affect the Companys consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 142
requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead be tested at least annually for impairment and that intangible assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective
estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and periodically reviewed for impairment.
13
The Company adopted as of January 1, 2002 the provisions of SFAS No.144 Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The adoption of this new standard did not affect the Companys consolidated financial statements. SFAS No.144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal
of long-lived assets.
The Company adopted as of January 1, 2002 the provisions of EITF Topic D-103, Income Statement
Characterization of Reimbursements Received for out-of-pocket Expense Incurred. The impact of adoption of EITF Topic D-103 was to increase both revenues and costs of revenues by the amounts relating to the reimbursable out-of
pocket expenses for all periods presented. See Note 1 Reclassifications.
Critical Accounting Policies
Please refer to our discussion of critical accounting policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
We Disclose Pro Forma Financial Information
We prepare and release quarterly unaudited financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). We also disclose and discuss certain pro forma financial information in the related earnings release and investor conference call. Our pro forma financial information does not include restructuring charges, non-cash
stock-based compensation to non-employees, and amortization of deferred stock compensation, stock-based deferred marketing expense, and acquired intangible assets. We believe the disclosure of the pro forma financial information helps investors more
meaningfully evaluate the results of our ongoing operations. However, we urge investors to carefully review the GAAP financial information included as part of our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, and our quarterly
earnings release, and compare that GAAP financial information with the pro forma financial results disclosed in our quarterly earnings releases and investor calls.
The following table shows the Companys pro forma results reconciled to the GAAP consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2002. Our pro forma
results for the three months ended March 31, 2002 exclude restructuring charges, amortization of deferred stock compensation, amortization of stock-based deferred marketing expense, and amortization of acquired intangible assets (in thousands,
except per share amount):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2002
|
|
GAAP net loss |
|
$ |
(7,254 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
703 |
|
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
|
(2,018 |
) |
Amortization of deferred marketing expense |
|
|
638 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(7,431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted pro forma net loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic and diluted pro forma net loss per common share |
|
|
66,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Factors That May Impact Future Operating Results
Risks Related To Our Financial Condition
We have incurred losses
during our operating history. These losses may continue for the foreseeable future, and we may not achieve profitability.
We incurred net losses of $7.3 million in the first quarter of 2002 and $69.6 million in 2001. As of March 31, 2002, we had an accumulated deficit of $151.4 million. We expect to continue to incur losses on both a quarterly and annual
basis, and may continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Moreover, we expect to continue to incur significant costs of services and substantial operating expenses. Further, we will continue to incur stock-based compensation expense in future
periods, which represents non-cash charges incurred mostly due to the issuance of stock options prior to our initial public offering on July 25, 2000. Therefore, we will need to significantly increase our revenues to achieve and maintain
profitability and a positive cash flow. We may not be able to generate sufficient revenues to achieve profitability.
Our declining cash balance
and volatile stock price may affect our potential and current customers and partners perception of our viability, which in turn could affect our ability to close sales and partnership transactions.
Notwithstanding the fact that we have a substantial cash balance, concerns about our perceived financial viability were a factor in multiple potential
and actual customer transactions and partner relationships during 2001 and the quarter ended March 31, 2002. We attribute these concerns primarily to the following: we are not yet profitable and thus must use our cash balance (offset by revenues) to
fund our operations; our stock price experienced a dramatic decline from 2000 into 2001; our stock price has been, and continues to be, extremely volatile; and many of our competitors are better funded, more established, or significantly larger than
we are. We will continue to use our cash balance (offset by revenues) to fund our operations until we achieve profitability (which may not occur); thus, our cash balance will continue to decline during the rest of 2002. Therefore, if these
conditions do not improve significantly later in 2002, we expect these concerns about our perceived viability to continue throughout 2002.
Because
our stock price is low and volatile, we could be at risk of having our stock delisted from the NASDAQ, which would harm our business in a number of ways.
Our stock is publicly traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market, or NASDAQ. NASDAQ rules allow the stock of a company whose stock price remains below $1 per share for 30 consecutive business
days to be delisted (removed from the NASDAQ exchange such that shares can no longer be traded on NASDAQ), unless the companys stock price exceeds $1 for at least 10 consecutive business days within a 90-day grace period. While NASDAQ
voluntarily suspended enforcement of this rule for a period during 2001, when many companies stocks (including ours) were trading near or below the $1 level, there can be no assurance that NASDAQ will not enforce this rule in the future. Our
stock price was near or below $1 for a substantial portion of 2001, and has been near $1 or below for portions of 2002 as well. If our stock were to be delisted from NASDAQ, it is likely that customers, partners, and potential sources of funding
would be less likely to do business with us on terms that we view as reasonable, and our operating results would suffer accordingly.
Cost-reduction efforts may adversely impact our productivity and service levels.
During 2001, we
instituted various cost-control measures affecting various aspects of our business operations. We also initiated reductions in our workforce of approximately 13% in March 2001, 25% in July 2001, and 10% in January 2002. Given current economic
conditions and our declining revenues over the last several quarters, we may in the future be required to take additional reduction in force and other cost-saving actions to reduce our losses and to conserve cash. The failure to achieve such future
cost savings could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. Moreover, even if we are successful with these efforts and generate the anticipated cost savings, there is no assurance that these actions will not adversely impact our
employees morale and productivity, the competitiveness of our products and business, and the results of our operations.
15
The recoverability of our investment in intangible and other assets could be reduced by several factors.
As of March 31, 2002, we had approximately $11.2 million of net intangible and other assets and $1.1 million of prepaid
license royalties to third parties capitalized on our balance sheet. We believe these intangible and other assets and prepaid license royalties are recoverable. However, changes in the economy, the business in which we operate, and our own relative
performance could change the assumptions used to evaluate the recoverability of intangible asset and prepaid royalties. We continue to monitor those assumptions and their effect on the estimated recoverability of our intangible assets.
Risks Related To Our Products
If we fail to keep pace
with technological innovation, improve our existing products, or develop new products, our application suite could become obsolete and our revenues would decline.
The market for our application suite is marked by rapid technological change, frequent new product introductions, Internet-related technology enhancements, uncertain product life cycles,
changes in client demands and evolving industry standards. New products based on new technologies or new industry standards can render existing products obsolete and unmarketable. To succeed, we will need to enhance our current application suite and
develop new products on a timely basis to keep pace with developments related to Internet technology and to satisfy the increasingly sophisticated requirements of our clients.
Enterprise application software technology is complex, and new products and product enhancements can require long development and testing periods; we cannot be certain that we will
successfully develop and market new products, new product enhancements or new products compliant with present or emerging Internet technology standards. Our future revenues will depend, in significant part, on our ability to successfully develop and
license new and enhanced versions of our application suite, and our ability to continue diversifying our offerings by developing and licensing new products. If we are not able to successfully improve our existing products and develop new products,
or if we develop new products and they do not achieve market acceptance, or if we were to experience delays in either, our revenues are likely to decline.
If we fail to release new versions and upgrades of our application suite in a timely manner, customers may license competing products and our revenues may decline.
We may fail to introduce or deliver new products on a timely basis, if at all. In the past, we have experienced delays in the commencement of commercial shipments of enhancements to our
application suite. To date, these delays have not had a material impact on our revenues. If we are unable to ship or implement new products or enhancements to our application suite when planned or at all, or fail to achieve timely market acceptance
of these new products or enhancements, we may suffer lost sales and thus reduce our revenues. Our future operating results will depend on demand for our application suite, including new and enhanced releases that are subsequently introduced.
If our application suite does not successfully function for customers with large numbers of transactions, customers or product offerings, we may
lose sales and suffer decreased revenues.
Our application suite must be able to accommodate a large number of
transactions, customers and product offerings. Large-scale usage presents significant technical challenges that are difficult or impossible to predict. To date, our application suite has been deployed by only a limited number of customers and,
therefore, we can make no assurances that our application suite is able to meet our customers demands for large-scale usage. If our customers experience difficulty with our application suite during periods of high traffic or usage, the
reputation of our products would suffer and our revenues would be likely to decline accordingly.
16
If our product does not operate with the wide variety of hardware, software and operating systems used by our
current and potential customers, our revenues would be harmed.
We currently serve a customer base that uses a wide
variety of constantly changing hardware, software applications and operating systems. Our application suite will gain broad market acceptance only if it can support a wide variety of hardware, software applications, systems, and standards, including
those developed in the future.
Defects in our application suite could diminish demand for our application suite and result in loss of revenues,
decreased market acceptance, injury to our reputation and product liability claims.
As is not unusual for software
companies, we have in the past discovered software errors and performance problems with various versions of our application suite after release, and, as a result, have experienced injury to our reputation, increased expenses, delays in the shipment
of our application suite and our customers have experienced difficulty in deploying and operating our application suite.
Errors
in our application suite may be caused by defects in third-party software incorporated into our application suite. If so, we may not be able to fix these defects without the cooperation of these software providers. Since these defects may not be as
significant to our software providers as they are to us, we may not receive the rapid cooperation that we may require. We may not have the contractual right to access the source code of third-party software and, even if we access the source code, we
may not be able to fix the defect.
Since our customers use our application suite for critical business applications such as
e-commerce, any errors, defects or other performance problems of our application suite could damage our customers businesses. Consequently, these customers could delay or withhold payment to us for our software and services, which could result
in an increase in our provision for doubtful accounts or an increase in collection cycles for accounts receivable. In addition, these customers could seek significant compensation from us for their losses. Even if unsuccessful, a product liability
claim brought against us would likely be time consuming and costly and harm our reputation, and thus our ability to license to new customers. Even if a suit is not brought, correcting errors in our application suite could increase our expenses.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property or become subject to intellectual property infringement claims, we may lose a valuable asset
or incur costly and time-consuming litigation.
Our success depends in part on the development and protection of the
proprietary aspects of our technology as well as our ability to operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others. To protect our proprietary technology, we rely primarily on a combination of trade secret, copyright, trademark, and
patent laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual restrictions. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights and technology, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or obtain the source code to our
software or use other information that we regard as proprietary or could develop software competitive to ours. Our means of protecting our proprietary rights may not be adequate, and our competitors may independently develop similar technology or
duplicate our product. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others, or to defend against claims of
infringement or invalidity. Any such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources that could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
We have no issued patents. We presently have several patent applications pending. It is possible that some or all of the patents that we have applied
for will not be issued, and even if issued, that some or all may be successfully challenged. It is also possible that we may not develop additional proprietary products or technologies that are patentable, that any patent issued to us may fail to
provide us with competitive advantage, and that the patents of others may harm our ability to do business.
17
It is possible that in the future, a third party may bring suit claiming that our current or
future products infringe its patents, trade secrets or copyrights. Any claims, with or without merit, could be costly and time-consuming to defend, divert our managements attention, or cause product delays. We currently have no issued patents
that we could use defensively against any company bringing such a claim. If our product was found to infringe a third partys proprietary rights, we could be required to enter into royalty or licensing agreements to be able to sell our product.
Royalty and licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms that are acceptable to us (or at all), which could harm our business.
Risks Related to Our Market and Our Ability to Sell
The current economic
downturn has significantly affected demand for our products and services and may continue to adversely impact future revenues.
The existence of economic downturns in the markets in which we operate has decreased the demand for our applications, caused pricing pressures for our products, and substantially reduced our sales activity during 2001. In 2001, we signed 29
new license contracts, a decrease from 67 new license contracts signed in 2000. The decreased demand continued into 2002. Because of macroeconomic conditions during 2001 and the first quarter of 2002, customers reduced their information technology
budgets and postponed or cancelled planned CRM projects, including the evaluation and purchase of new applications, upgrades to existing applications, and purchase of related services. As a result, our revenues have been negatively impacted, and may
continue to be in the future.
Our budgeting and forecasting depend on estimates of revenue growth in our target markets. Thus,
the prevailing economic uncertainty makes it difficult to estimate anticipated license contract signings and future revenues. The future performance of the overall domestic and global economies will have a significant impact on our overall
performance. To the extent that the current downturn continues or increases in severity or scope, we believe demand for our products and services, and therefore future revenues, could be further reduced.
We may not be able to maintain our competitive position against current and potential competitors.
We compete in the highly competitive CRM market, which is subject to rapid technological change. Our products compete with stand-alone point solutions offered by providers such as
BroadVision, Inc. and Vignette Corporation, components offered by vendors such as Art Technology Group, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation, and the external-facing CRM products beginning to be offered by vendors such as Oracle Corp., PeopleSoft, Inc.,
SAP AG, E.phipany, Inc., and Siebel Systems, Inc. Another principal source of competition is the internal information technology departments at potential customers, which may develop systems that provide for some or all of the functionality of our
applications.
Compared to us, many of these competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger
customer bases and significantly greater financial resources. This may place us at a disadvantage in responding to our competitors pricing strategies, technological advances, advertising campaigns, strategic partnerships and other initiatives.
Competitive pressures and our perceived viability in this market may make it difficult for us to acquire and retain customers, and may require us to reduce the price of our products which could reduce our revenues and result in increased operating
losses.
The sales cycle for our products is long, lengthening, and variable, which makes it difficult to predict our future revenues and may cause
our operating results to vary significantly.
Our revenues and results of operations are difficult to predict and may
fluctuate substantially from quarter to quarter. For example, certain indicators that we relied upon in developing our license revenue forecasts, such as our historical pattern of transaction timing and anticipated sales cycles, did not prove
reliable during 2001 or during the first quarter of 2002. During these periods, we continued to see extended sales cycles and postponed customer spending; our average sales period was six to twelve months in 2001, compared to three to six months in
2000.
18
The period between initial contact with a prospective customer and the licensing of our
application suite varies and can range from three to more than twelve months. Because of this variable sales cycle, the timing of revenues from the licensing of our application suite is difficult to forecast. Factors affecting it include:
|
|
|
A significant portion of our license agreements is completed within the last few weeks of each quarter. |
|
|
|
Customers consider a number of factors related to our products and services, as well as our financial condition, before committing to purchase our application suite. As a
result, we spend significant time and resources informing prospective customers about our company, application suite, and other offerings, which may not result in a completed transaction but may nonetheless impact our operating margins;
|
|
|
|
The licensing of our application suite is often an enterprise-wide decision by our customers that involves many factors and decision-makers; thus, if our customers
management, budget, or strategy changes, our ability to conclude license agreements may be affected; |
|
|
|
Because a substantial portion of our quarterly revenues are derived from a small number of customers, delays in the signing of one or more large license agreements or the loss
of a significant customer order may materially affect revenues and our operating results; |
|
|
|
Due to macroeconomic conditions, customers have postponed or canceled planned CRM projects, including the evaluation and purchase of new applications or upgrades to existing
applications, and have increased customer requests for contract terms that affect our ability to recognize revenue. These conditions may persist in the future; |
|
|
|
Customer approval processes are unpredictable; delays in approvals, even after selection of a vendor, could impact the timing and amount of revenues recognized in a quarterly
period; |
|
|
|
Changes in our sales incentive plans may have an unpredictable impact on our sales cycle and contracting activities; and |
|
|
|
The number, timing and significance of enhancements to our application suite and the introduction by us or our competitors of new software may affect customers purchasing
decisions. |
Because of this variation in sales cycle length, it is hard for us to predict revenues and thus
our operating results could be affected. For example, if our license results do not meet our internal expectations, our service offerings would be affected (since service utilization lags licenses) and our services revenues would be reduced, which
would harm our overall results since service expenses are relatively fixed in the short term.
A small number of customers have accounted for a
substantial portion of our revenues, and this pattern is likely to continue for the foreseeable future; as a result, our revenues could decline due to the loss or delay of a single customer order, the delay in recognizing revenue associated with a
single customer order, or the failure to collect revenue associated with a single customer.
Each quarter during our
operating history, a relatively small number of customers has accounted for a significant portion of that quarters total revenues. We expect this to continue in the future. Thus, the loss or delay of individual orders could have a significant
impact on revenues and operating results.
The timing of recognition of customer revenue may also affect our results. Customer
payments that do not meet our revenue recognition policy requirements are recorded as deferred revenue. Although new agreements may not result in revenues in the quarter in which the agreement was signed, commissions and royalties may nonetheless
become payable on such agreements during that quarter, which would impact our operating results.
19
We may not successfully establish ourselves in international markets or generate significant revenues abroad,
which could result in slower revenue growth and harm our business.
To date, we have generated limited revenues from
sales outside the United States. We have established sales offices in the Australia, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Singapore, and United Kingdom, and have also sold successfully in each of these countries. We may add others
in the future. If we are not successful in licensing our application suite in international markets, we could experience slower revenue growth and our business could be harmed. We anticipate devoting additional resources and management attention to
expanding international opportunities. Our international expansion has a number of effects, including:
|
|
|
greater difficulty in staffing and managing foreign operations; |
|
|
|
expenses associated with foreign operations and compliance with applicable laws; |
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions political or economic conditions; |
|
|
|
expenses associated with localizing our product for foreign countries; |
|
|
|
differing intellectual property rights; |
|
|
|
protectionist laws and business practices that favor local competitors; |
|
|
|
different sales cycles and collection periods or seasonal reductions in business activity; |
|
|
|
multiple, conflicting and changing governmental laws and regulations; and |
|
|
|
foreign currency restrictions and exchange rate fluctuations. |
Increasing government regulation of the Internet, imposition of sales and other taxes on products sold by our customers over the Internet and privacy concerns relating to the Internet could reduce the license of our application suite
and harm our business.
Federal, state or foreign agencies may adopt laws or regulations affecting the use of the
Internet as a commercial medium. We expect that laws and regulations relating to user privacy, pricing, content and quality of products and services could indirectly affect our business.
Current federal legislation limits the imposition of state and local taxes on Internet-related sales at this time. Congress may choose not to renew this legislation in 2002, in which
case state and local governments would be free to impose taxes on electronically purchased goods. The imposition of new sales or other taxes could limit the growth of Internet commerce in general and, as a result, the demand for our application
suite and services.
Businesses use our application suite to capture information regarding their customers when those customers
contact them on-line with customer service inquiries. Privacy concerns may cause visitors to withhold personal data, which would limit the effectiveness of our application suite. More importantly, even the perception of privacy concerns, whether or
not valid, may indirectly inhibit market acceptance of our application suite.
Risks Related To System Integrators
Our failure to develop and maintain strong relationships with consulting and system integrator firms (CSIs) would harm our ability to
market our application suite, which could reduce future revenues and increase our expenses.
An increasing portion of
our sales are influenced by the recommendation of our application suite by systems integrators, consulting firms and other third parties that help deploy our application suite for our customers. Losing the support of these third parties may limit
our ability to penetrate our existing or potential markets. These third parties are under no obligation to recommend or support our application suite and could recommend or give higher priority to their own products and services or those of other
companies. Our inability to gain the support of CSIs or a shift by these companies toward favoring competing products could negatively affect our software license and service revenues.
20
Some CSIs also engage in joint marketing and sales efforts with us. If our relationships with
these CSIs fail, we will have to devote substantially more resources to the sales and marketing of our application suite. In many cases, these parties have extensive relationships with our existing and potential customers and influence the decisions
of these customers. A number of our competitors have longer and more established relationships with these CSIs than we do, and as a result those CSIs may be more likely to recommend competitors products and services and increase our expenses.
Our failure to develop and maintain strong relationships with systems integrators would harm our ability to implement our application suite.
Systems integrators assist our customers with the installation and deployment of our application suite, in addition to
those products of our competitors, and perform custom integration of computer systems and software. If we are unable to develop and maintain relationships with systems integrators, we would be required to hire additional personnel to install and
maintain our application suite, which would result in higher expenses and delays in our ability to recognize revenue.
Other Risks
Changes in accounting policies created and interpreted by authoritative agencies can have a significant effect
on our reported results and may even affect the reporting of transactions completed before a change is announced.
We
prepare our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles are subject to interpretation by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Securities
and Exchange Commission, and various bodies formed to interpret and create accounting policies. A change in these policies can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect the reporting of transactions completed before a
change is announced. Our accounting policies that may be affected by changes in the accounting rules are as follows:
|
|
|
rules relating to revenue recognition |
|
|
|
accounting for business combination |
|
|
|
stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
goodwill and other intangible assets accounting |
Changes to these rules or the questioning of current practices may have a significant adverse effect on our reported financial results or in the way in which we conduct our business. See the discussion under
Critical Accounting Policies above for additional information about our critical accounting policies and some risks associated with these policies.
We recently entered into an acquisition, and may enter into mergers or acquisitions in the future; our business could be affected by the distraction and challenges posed by such transactions.
Effective April 16, 2002, we acquired the Cybrant Corporation. In the future, we may merge with, or acquire other technologies or companies. Entering
into any business combination entails many risks, any of which could materially harm our business, including:
|
|
|
diversion of the attention of management or key technical employees from other business concerns; |
|
|
|
failure to assimilate the combined companies with the pre-existing business; |
|
|
|
failure to integrate the acquired technology with our existing technologies; |
|
|
|
delays in our product releases caused by the integration of the acquired technology with our existing technologies; |
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees from either our pre-existing business or the combined business; |
|
|
|
increasing our cost structure and thus our use of existing cash resources; |
21
|
|
|
dilution of our existing stockholders as a result of issuing equity securities; and |
|
|
|
assumption of liabilities of the merged or acquired company. |
In the future, we may not be able to identify suitable merger or acquisition candidates, and even if we do identify suitable candidates, we may not be able to make these transactions on commercially acceptable terms
(if at all). In our acquisition of Cybrant, or if we merge with or acquire other companies in the future, we may not be able to realize the benefits we expected to achieve at the time of entering into the transaction. In any future merger or
acquisition, we will likely face the same risks as those discussed above. Further, we may have to use our cash reserves, incur debt, or issue equity securities to pay for any future merger or acquisition. Each of these financing alternatives could
have negative consequences, by decreasing our cash reserves, increasing our debt burden, or diluting our existing stockholders.
We are the target
of securities class action claims relating to our IPO, and are at risk of securities class action litigation, which could result in substantial costs and divert management attention and resources.
During July 2001, several securities class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
against us, the underwriters of our initial public offering, our directors, and certain of our officers. In each of these complaints, the plaintiffs claim that Blue Martini, certain of its officers and directors, and the underwriters of its initial
public offering, or IPO, violated the federal securities laws because Blue Martinis IPO registration statement and prospectus allegedly contained untrue statements of material fact or omitted material facts regarding the compensation to be
received by, and the stock allocation practices of, the IPO underwriters. The complaints seek unspecified monetary damages and attorneys fees and other costs. These cases have been consolidated into a single case. Similar complaints were filed in
the same court against hundreds of other public companies that conducted IPOs of their common stock since the mid-1990s. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses against the lawsuits and intends to defend itself vigorously.
In addition, in the past, other types of securities class action litigation have been brought against companies following a
decline in the market price of their securities. This risk is especially acute for us because technology companies have experienced greater than average stock price volatility in recent years, particularly since mid-2000, and, as a result,
technology companies have been subject to a greater number of securities class action claims than companies in other industries. We may in the future be the target of additional securities class action litigation. Securities litigation could result
in substantial costs and divert managements attention and resources, which could harm our business.
We may have difficulty retaining or
recruiting qualified personnel, which could impact the development and license of our application suite.
Difficulty in
hiring or retaining qualified personnel, or failure by newly hired personnel to develop necessary skills or reach expected levels of productivity, may weaken our ability to develop and market our application suite. Our success also depends on the
continued contributions of key engineering, sales and marketing, management, and professional services personnel. In particular, Monte Zweben, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, would be difficult to replace.
During 2001, we experienced both involuntary and voluntary turnover throughout the company, including several members of our executive staff. In
particular, our Chief Financial Officer and other members of management in our Finance organization voluntarily left. We have re-staffed the organization, including by appointing one of our existing executives as the new Chief Financial Officer, but
there is no assurance that our integration of new personnel into the existing organization will not disrupt operations.
Our
ability to increase our sales will depend on our ability to recruit, train and retain top-quality sales people who can target prospective customers senior management and generate and service large accounts. In our industry, competition for
qualified sales personnel is intense.
22
Our directors and executive officers maintain significant control over Blue Martini Software, which may lead to
conflicts with other stockholders over corporate governance.
Our directors, executive officers, and holders of 5% or
more of our outstanding common stock owned approximately 51.4% of our outstanding common stock as of April 8, 2002. Monte Zweben, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, together with related entities, owned approximately 39.0% of our common stock
as of this date. These stockholders, acting together, and Mr. Zweben, individually, will be able to significantly influence all matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and significant corporate
transactions such as mergers or other business combination transactions. This control may delay or prevent a third party from acquiring or merging with us.
We have implemented anti-takeover provisions that could discourage or prevent a takeover, even if an acquisition would be beneficial to our stockholders.
Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even
if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These provisions include:
|
|
|
establishment of a classified board of directors such that not all members of the board may be elected at one time; |
|
|
|
authorizing the issuance of blank check preferred stock that could be issued by our board of directors to increase the number of outstanding shares and thwart a
takeover attempt; |
|
|
|
prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors, which would otherwise allow less than a majority of stockholders to elect director candidates;
|
|
|
|
limitations on the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders; |
|
|
|
prohibiting stockholder action by written consent and requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders; and |
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder
meetings. |
In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporations Law and the terms of our stock
option plans may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of the Company.
23
Foreign Currency Exchange
Through March 31, 2002, most of our recognized revenues have been denominated
in United States dollars and were from both domestic and international customers. Our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate changes has not been material. We expect that future license and service revenues will continue to be derived from
international markets and may be denominated in the currency of the applicable market.We have incurred limited operating expenses denominated in foreign currencies. Our future operating results may become subject to significant fluctuations based
upon changes in the exchange rates of foreign currencies in relation to the United States dollar. In the future, we expect to engage in international sales denominated in both the United States dollar and in foreign currencies. An increase in the
value of the United States dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our products less competitive in international markets. Although we will continue to monitor our exposure to currency fluctuations and, when appropriate, may use economic
hedging techniques in the future to minimize the effect of these fluctuations, we can make no assurances that exchange rate fluctuations will not adversely affect our financial results in the future. Through March 31, 2002, the Company had not
engaged in foreign currency hedging activities.
Fixed Income Investments
At March 31, 2002, we had an investment portfolio of fixed income securities, including those classified as cash equivalents, of $88.9 million compared
to $97.5 million at December 31, 2001. Our exposure to financial market risk, including changes in interest rates, relates primarily to our investment portfolio. Our general policy is to limit the risk of principal loss and ensure the safety of
invested funds by limiting market and credit risk. This exposure is limited by the establishment and strict monitoring of compliance with our investment policy which provides for investments in fixed income securities with maturities not exceeding
18 months. This policy also establishes credit quality standards and limits investment exposure to any one issuer. We do not invest in any derivative instruments. The fair value of our investment portfolio or related income would not be
significantly impacted by either a 100 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates due mainly to the relatively short-term nature of our available-for-sale investment portfolio.
24
Beginning in July 2001, Blue Martini and certain of
its officers and directors were named as defendants in several class action shareholder complaints filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, consolidated under the caption, Tortoso v. Blue Martini Software,
Inc., et al., Case No. 01-CV-6241. In each of these complaints, the plaintiffs claim that Blue Martini, certain of its officers and directors, and the underwriters of its initial public offering, or IPO, violated the federal securities laws because
Blue Martinis IPO registration statement and prospectus allegedly contained untrue statements of material fact or omitted material facts regarding the compensation to be received by, and the stock allocation practices of, the IPO underwriters.
The plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary damages and other relief. Similar complaints were filed in the same Court against hundreds of other public companies that conducted IPOs of their common stock since the mid-1990s.
On August 8, 2001, all of these IPO-related lawsuits were consolidated for pretrial purposes before United States Judge Shira Scheindlin of the Southern
District of New York. Judge Scheindlin held an initial case management conference on September 7, 2001, at which time she ordered, among other things, that the time for all defendants in the IPO lawsuits to respond to any complaint be postponed
until further order of the Court. Thus, Blue Martini has not been required to answer any of the complaints, and no discovery has been served on Blue Martini.
In accordance with Judge Scheindlins orders at further status conferences in March and April, the appointed lead plaintiffs counsel filed amended, consolidated complaints in the IPO lawsuits on April 19,
2002. However, Judge Scheindlin does not expect any of the defendants to file motions to dismiss the amended, consolidated complaints until at least summer of 2002. The Company believes that this lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend
against it vigorously.
On May 3, 2002, Blue Martini was notified that a shareholders derivative complaint was to be filed
in Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo, under the caption Richard D. Yager, derivatively on behalf of Blue Martini Software, Inc., v. Zweben et al. The complaint provided to the Company purports to be filed on behalf of
Blue Martini, names as defendants Blue Martini (as a nominal defendant), certain Blue Martini officers and directors, and Goldman Sachs, the managing underwriter of Blue Martinis initial public offering, or IPO. The complaint alleges that the
defendants breached fiduciary and other duties, were negligent, and were unjustly enriched because the IPO price of Blue Martinis stock allegedly was set too low. The plaintiff seeks unspecified monetary damages and other relief. Similar
complaints have been filed in California state Courts against other public companies that conducted IPOs of their common stock in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The Company believes that the lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend against it
vigorously.
(a) Exhibits
None
(b) Reports on
Form 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended March 31, 2002.
25
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: May
6, 2002
BLUE MARTINI SOFTWARE, INC. (Registrant) |
|
By: |
|
/s/ MONTE ZWEBEN
|
|
|
Monte Zweben Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ ROBERT E. CELL
|
|
|
Robert E. Cell Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
26