UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission File No. 001-31298
LANNETT COMPANY, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
State of Delaware |
|
23-0787699 |
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer I.D. No.) |
9000 State Road
Philadelphia, PA 19136
(215) 333-9000
(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer x |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12B-12 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each class of the registrants common stock, as of the latest practical date.
Class |
|
Outstanding as of January 31, 2013 |
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share |
|
28,389,531 |
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
(In thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
June 30, 2012 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
31,455 |
|
$ |
22,562 |
|
Investment securities |
|
6,638 |
|
6,667 |
| ||
Trade accounts receivable (net of allowance of $111 and $124, respectively) |
|
41,370 |
|
42,212 |
| ||
Inventories, net |
|
30,688 |
|
27,064 |
| ||
Prepaid income taxes |
|
249 |
|
2,120 |
| ||
Deferred tax assets |
|
4,955 |
|
4,833 |
| ||
Other current assets |
|
1,309 |
|
1,023 |
| ||
Total Current Assets |
|
116,664 |
|
106,481 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
38,876 |
|
37,068 |
| ||
Intangible assets, net |
|
3,488 |
|
4,429 |
| ||
Deferred tax assets |
|
8,540 |
|
9,069 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
810 |
|
1,171 |
| ||
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
168,378 |
|
$ |
158,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
18,625 |
|
$ |
17,989 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
1,982 |
|
1,518 |
| ||
Accrued payroll and payroll related |
|
3,810 |
|
3,198 |
| ||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
654 |
|
648 |
| ||
Rebates, chargebacks and returns payable |
|
18,961 |
|
17,039 |
| ||
Total Current Liabilities |
|
44,032 |
|
40,392 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
6,255 |
|
6,513 |
| ||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
50,287 |
|
46,905 |
| ||
Commitment and Contingencies, See notes 13 and 14 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock - authorized 50,000,000 shares, par value $0.001; issued 28,822,773 and 28,594,437 shares, respectively; outstanding, 28,386,894 and 28,252,192 shares, respectively |
|
29 |
|
29 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
100,913 |
|
99,515 |
| ||
Retained earnings |
|
19,043 |
|
13,236 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(26 |
) |
(63 |
) | ||
Treasury stock at cost 435,879 and 342,245 shares, respectively |
|
(2,034 |
) |
(1,594 |
) | ||
Total Shareholders Equity Attributable to Lannett Company, Inc. |
|
117,925 |
|
111,123 |
| ||
Noncontrolling Interest |
|
166 |
|
190 |
| ||
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
118,091 |
|
111,313 |
| ||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
168,378 |
|
$ |
158,218 |
|
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||||||||
(In thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
36,564 |
|
$ |
27,734 |
|
$ |
71,858 |
|
$ |
56,612 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
22,620 |
|
19,771 |
|
43,784 |
|
39,513 |
| ||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
470 |
|
470 |
|
941 |
|
938 |
| ||||
Product royalties |
|
53 |
|
66 |
|
86 |
|
118 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gross profit |
|
13,421 |
|
7,427 |
|
27,047 |
|
16,043 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Research and development expenses |
|
3,572 |
|
2,513 |
|
7,336 |
|
4,939 |
| ||||
Selling, general, and administrative expenses |
|
5,155 |
|
4,419 |
|
11,326 |
|
9,164 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating income |
|
4,694 |
|
495 |
|
8,385 |
|
1,940 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency gain (loss) |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
3 |
|
(3 |
) | ||||
Gain (loss) on sale of assets |
|
(112 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(42 |
) |
4 |
| ||||
Realized gain (loss) on investments |
|
132 |
|
27 |
|
96 |
|
(146 |
) | ||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
|
(61 |
) |
675 |
|
209 |
|
(151 |
) | ||||
Litigation settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
| ||||
Interest and dividend income |
|
27 |
|
36 |
|
62 |
|
89 |
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
(72 |
) |
(73 |
) |
(135 |
) |
(150 |
) | ||||
|
|
(86 |
) |
654 |
|
1,443 |
|
(357 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income before income tax expense |
|
4,608 |
|
1,149 |
|
9,828 |
|
1,583 |
| ||||
Income tax expense |
|
1,749 |
|
519 |
|
4,026 |
|
731 |
| ||||
Net income |
|
2,859 |
|
630 |
|
5,802 |
|
852 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Less net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
22 |
|
(21 |
) |
5 |
|
(37 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income attributable to Lannett Company, Inc. |
|
$ |
2,881 |
|
$ |
609 |
|
$ |
5,807 |
|
$ |
815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic earnings per common share - Lannett Company, Inc. |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share - Lannett Company, Inc. |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic weighted average number of shares |
|
28,347,464 |
|
28,526,658 |
|
28,312,989 |
|
28,479,195 |
| ||||
Diluted weighted average number of shares |
|
28,450,597 |
|
28,773,477 |
|
28,424,027 |
|
28,733,435 |
|
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Income |
|
$ |
2,859 |
|
$ |
630 |
|
$ |
5,802 |
|
$ |
852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
(4 |
) |
(32 |
) |
37 |
|
(35 |
) | ||||
Unrealized holding loss on securities |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) | ||||
Tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax |
|
(4 |
) |
(33 |
) |
37 |
|
(36 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Comprehensive Income |
|
2,855 |
|
597 |
|
5,839 |
|
816 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Less: Total Comprehensive Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
22 |
|
(21 |
) |
5 |
|
(37 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Comprehensive Income attributable to Lannett Company Inc. |
|
$ |
2,877 |
|
$ |
576 |
|
$ |
5,844 |
|
$ |
779 |
|
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Shareholders Equity Attributable to Lannett Company, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Additional |
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Total |
| ||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Treasury |
|
Attributable to |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Shareholders |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Balance, July 1, 2012 |
|
28,594 |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
99,515 |
|
$ |
13,236 |
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
$ |
(1,594 |
) |
$ |
111,123 |
|
$ |
190 |
|
$ |
111,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Shares issued in connection with share-based compensation plans |
|
229 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
458 |
| ||||||||
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
940 |
| ||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
(440 |
) |
|
|
(440 |
) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
37 |
| ||||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
(19 |
) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,807 |
|
(5 |
) |
5,802 |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2012 |
|
28,823 |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
100,913 |
|
$ |
19,043 |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
$ |
(2,034 |
) |
$ |
117,925 |
|
$ |
166 |
|
$ |
118,091 |
|
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Six months ended |
| ||||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
5,802 |
|
$ |
852 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
3,091 |
|
2,802 |
| ||
Deferred tax expense |
|
407 |
|
691 |
| ||
Share-based compensation expense |
|
940 |
|
1,162 |
| ||
Gain on sale of assets |
|
42 |
|
(4 |
) | ||
Realized (gain) loss on investments |
|
(96 |
) |
146 |
| ||
Unrealized (gain) loss on investments |
|
(209 |
) |
151 |
| ||
Gain on litigation settlement |
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
| ||
Proceeds from litigation settlement |
|
1,250 |
|
|
| ||
Other noncash expenses |
|
7 |
|
6 |
| ||
Changes in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Trade accounts receivable |
|
842 |
|
(3,258 |
) | ||
Inventories |
|
(3,624 |
) |
3,034 |
| ||
Prepaid income taxes |
|
1,871 |
|
44 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
299 |
|
(908 |
) | ||
Accounts payable |
|
636 |
|
(4,723 |
) | ||
Accrued expenses |
|
464 |
|
(313 |
) | ||
Rebates, chargebacks and returns payable |
|
1,922 |
|
3,321 |
| ||
Accrued payroll and payroll related |
|
612 |
|
739 |
| ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
13,006 |
|
3,742 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
(4,303 |
) |
(2,263 |
) | ||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
73 |
|
7 |
| ||
Proceeds from sale of investment securities |
|
8,888 |
|
25,821 |
| ||
Purchase of investment securities |
|
(8,555 |
) |
(11,952 |
) | ||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
(3,897 |
) |
11,613 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Repayments of debt |
|
(252 |
) |
(276 |
) | ||
Proceeds from issuance of stock |
|
458 |
|
135 |
| ||
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
(440 |
) |
(480 |
) | ||
Tax shortfall on stock options exercised |
|
|
|
(7 |
) | ||
Distribution to noncontrolling interests |
|
(19 |
) |
(19 |
) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(253 |
) |
(647 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Effect of foreign currency rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
37 |
|
(35 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
8,893 |
|
14,673 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
22,562 |
|
5,277 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
31,455 |
|
$ |
19,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION - |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest paid |
|
$ |
135 |
|
$ |
149 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
1,748 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
Note 1. Interim Financial Information
The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for presentation of interim financial statements and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the unaudited financial statements do not include all the information and footnotes necessary for a comprehensive presentation of the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements include all the normal recurring adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. Operating results for the three and six months ended December 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. You should read these unaudited financial statements in combination with the other Notes in this section; Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations appearing in Item 2; and the Financial Statements, including the Notes to the Financial Statements, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Lannett Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and subsidiaries (the Company or Lannett), develop, manufacture, package, market, and distribute finished dosage forms of drugs as well as manufacture active pharmaceutical ingredients. The Company manufactures solid oral dosage forms, including tablets and capsules, topical and oral solutions, and is pursuing partnerships and contracts for the development and production of other dosage forms, including ophthalmic, nasal and injectable products.
The Company is engaged in an industry which is subject to considerable government regulation related to the development, manufacture, and marketing of pharmaceutical products. In the normal course of business, the Company periodically responds to inquiries or engages in administrative and judicial proceedings involving regulatory authorities, particularly the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the operating parent company, Lannett Company, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiaries, as well as the consolidation of Cody LCI Realty, LLC, a variable interest entity. See Note 12 regarding the consolidation of this variable interest entity. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Foreign Currency Translation - The local currency is the functional currency of the Companys foreign subsidiary. Assets and liabilities of the foreign subsidiary are translated into U.S. dollars at the period-end currency exchange rate and revenues and expenses are translated at an average currency exchange rate for the period. The resulting translation adjustment is recorded in a separate component of shareholders equity and changes to such are included in comprehensive income. Exchange adjustments resulting from transactions denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.
Reclassifications - Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year financial statement presentation.
Revenue Recognition - The Company recognizes revenue when its products are shipped. At this point, title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer and provisions for estimates, including rebates, promotional adjustments, price adjustments, returns, chargebacks, and other potential adjustments are reasonably determinable. Accruals for these provisions are presented in the consolidated financial statements as rebates, chargebacks and returns payable and reductions to net sales. The change in the reserves for various sales adjustments may not be proportionally equal to the change in sales because of changes in both the product and the customer mix. Increased sales to wholesalers will generally require additional accruals as they are the primary recipient of chargebacks and rebates. Incentives offered to secure sales vary from product to product. Provisions for estimated rebates and promotional credits are estimated based upon contractual terms. Provisions for other customer credits, such as price adjustments, returns, and chargebacks, require management to make subjective judgments on customer mix. Unlike branded innovator drug companies, Lannett does not use information about product levels in distribution channels from third-party sources, such as IMS and Wolters Kluwer, in estimating future returns and other credits. Lannett calculates a chargeback/rebate rate based on contractual terms
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
with its customers and applies this rate to customer sales. The only variable is customer mix, and this assumption is based on historical data and sales expectations.
Chargebacks - The provision for chargebacks is the most significant and complex estimate used in the recognition of revenue. The Company sells its products directly to wholesale distributors, generic distributors, retail pharmacy chains, and mail-order pharmacies. The Company also sells its products indirectly to independent pharmacies, managed care organizations, hospitals, nursing homes, and group purchasing organizations, collectively referred to as indirect customers. Lannett enters into agreements with its indirect customers to establish pricing for certain products. The indirect customers then independently select a wholesaler from which to actually purchase the products at these agreed-upon prices. Lannett will provide credit to the wholesaler for the difference between the agreed-upon price with the indirect customer and the wholesalers invoice price if the price sold to the indirect customer is lower than the direct price to the wholesaler. This credit is called a chargeback. The provision for chargebacks is based on expected sell-through levels by the Companys wholesale customers to the indirect customers and estimated wholesaler inventory levels. As sales to the large wholesale customers, such as Cardinal Health, AmerisourceBergen, and McKesson increase (decrease), the reserve for chargebacks will also generally increase (decrease). However, the size of the increase (decrease) depends on the product mix and the amount of those sales that end up at indirect customers with which the Company has specific chargeback agreements. The Company continually monitors the reserve for chargebacks and makes adjustments when management believes that expected chargebacks on actual sales may differ from actual chargeback reserves.
Rebates - Rebates are offered to the Companys key chain drug store, distributor and wholesaler customers to promote customer loyalty and increase product sales. These rebate programs provide customers with rebate credits upon attainment of pre-established volumes or attainment of net sales milestones for a specified period. Other promotional programs are incentive programs offered to the customers. As a result of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) enacted in the U.S. in March 2010, the Company participates in a new cost sharing program for certain Medicare Part D beneficiaries designed primarily for the sale of brand drugs and certain generic drugs if their FDA approval was granted under a New Drug Application (NDA) or 505(b) NDA versus an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA). Because our drugs used for the treatment of thyroid deficiency and our Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution product were each approved by the FDA as a 505(b)(2) NDA, they are considered branded drugs for purposes of the PPACA. Drugs purchased under this program during Medicare Part D coverage gap (commonly referred to as the donut hole) result in additional rebates. At the time of shipment, the Company estimates reserves for rebates and other promotional credit programs based on the specific terms in each agreement. The reserve for rebates increases (decreases) as sales to certain wholesale and retail customers increase (decrease). However, since these rebate programs are not identical for all customers, the size of the reserve will depend on the mix of customers that are eligible to receive rebates.
Returns - Consistent with industry practice, the Company has a product returns policy that allows customers to return product within a specified period prior to and subsequent to the products lot expiration date in exchange for a credit to be applied to future purchases. The Companys policy requires that the customer obtain pre-approval from the Company for any qualifying return. The Company estimates its provision for returns based on historical experience, changes to business practices, and credit terms. While such experience has allowed for reasonable estimations in the past, history may not always be an accurate indicator of future returns. The Company continually monitors the provisions for returns and makes adjustments when management believes that actual product returns may differ from established reserves. Generally, the reserve for returns increases (decreases) as net sales increase (decrease). The reserve for returns is included in the rebates, chargebacks and returns payable account on the balance sheet.
Other Adjustments - Other adjustments consist primarily of price adjustments, also known as shelf stock adjustments, which are credits issued to reflect decreases in the selling prices of the Companys products that customers have remaining in their inventories at the time of the price reduction. Decreases in selling prices are discretionary decisions made by management to reflect competitive market conditions. Amounts recorded for estimated shelf stock adjustments are based upon specified terms with direct customers, estimated declines in market prices, and estimates of inventory held by customers. The Company regularly monitors these and other factors and evaluates the reserve as additional information becomes available. Other adjustments are included in the rebates, chargebacks and returns payable account on the balance sheet.
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
The following tables identify the reserves for each major category of revenue allowance and a summary of the activity for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:
For the six months ended December 31, 2012
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reserve Category |
|
Chargebacks |
|
Rebates |
|
Returns |
|
Other |
|
Total |
| |||||
Reserve Balance as of July 1, 2012 |
|
$ |
7,063 |
|
$ |
4,436 |
|
$ |
5,540 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
17,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Actual credits issued related to sales recorded in prior fiscal years |
|
(6,584 |
) |
(4,000 |
) |
(1,644 |
) |
(61 |
) |
(12,289 |
) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reserves or (reversals) charged during Fiscal 2013 related to sales in prior fiscal years |
|
(461 |
) |
131 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
(269 |
) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reserves charged to net sales during Fiscal 2013 related to sales recorded in Fiscal 2013 |
|
37,235 |
|
11,951 |
|
2,456 |
|
1,250 |
|
52,892 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Actual credits issued related to sales recorded in Fiscal 2013 |
|
(29,176 |
) |
(7,986 |
) |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
(38,412 |
) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reserve Balance as of December 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
8,077 |
|
$ |
4,532 |
|
$ |
6,352 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
18,961 |
|
For the six months ended December 31, 2011
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reserve Category |
|
Chargebacks |
|
Rebates |
|
Returns |
|
Other |
|
Total |
| |||||
Reserve Balance as of July 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
5,497 |
|
$ |
2,925 |
|
$ |
5,142 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
13,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Actual credits issued related to sales recorded in prior fiscal years |
|
(5,213 |
) |
(2,985 |
) |
(2,469 |
) |
(133 |
) |
(10,800 |
) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reserves or (reversals) charged during Fiscal 2012 related to sales in prior fiscal years |
|
(62 |
) |
255 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
326 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reserves charged to net sales during Fiscal 2012 related to sales recorded in Fiscal 2012 |
|
34,292 |
|
10,211 |
|
2,444 |
|
356 |
|
47,303 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Actual credits issued related to sales recorded in Fiscal 2012 |
|
(27,488 |
) |
(5,663 |
) |
|
|
(356 |
) |
(33,507 |
) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Reserve Balance as of December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
7,026 |
|
$ |
4,743 |
|
$ |
5,117 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
16,886 |
|
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
Reserve Activity December 31, 2012 vs. June 30, 2012
The following tables compare the reserve balances at December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012:
|
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
June 30, 2012 |
| ||||||
(In thousands) |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
| ||
Chargeback reserve |
|
$ |
8,077 |
|
43 |
% |
$ |
7,063 |
|
41 |
% |
Rebate reserve |
|
4,532 |
|
24 |
% |
4,436 |
|
26 |
% | ||
Return reserve |
|
6,352 |
|
33 |
% |
5,540 |
|
33 |
% | ||
Other reserve |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% | ||
|
|
$ |
18,961 |
|
100 |
% |
$ |
17,039 |
|
100 |
% |
The total reserve for chargebacks, rebates, returns and other adjustments increased from $17,039 at June 30, 2012 to $18,961 at December 31, 2012. The increase in chargeback reserves is due primarily to an increase in inventory levels at wholesale distribution centers as a result of increased gross sales during the six months of Fiscal 2013 as compared to Fiscal 2012. The activity in the Other category for the period ended December 31, 2012 includes shelf-stock, shipping and other sales adjustments.
The Company ships its products to the warehouses of its wholesale and retail chain customers. When the Company and a customer enter into an agreement for the supply of a product, the customer will generally continue to purchase the product, stock its warehouse(s), and resell the product to its own customers. The Companys customer will reorder the product as its warehouse is depleted. The Company generally has no minimum size orders for its customers. Additionally, most warehousing customers prefer not to stock excess inventory levels due to the additional carrying costs and inefficiencies created by holding excess inventory. As such, the Companys customers continually reorder the Companys products. It is common for the Companys customers to order the same products on a monthly basis. For generic pharmaceutical manufacturers, it is critical to ensure that customers warehouses are adequately stocked with its products. This is important due to the fact that multiple generic competitors may compete for the consumer demand for a given product. Availability of inventory ensures that a manufacturers product is considered. Otherwise, retail prescriptions would be filled with competitors products. For this reason, the Company periodically offers incentives to its customers to purchase its products. These incentives are generally up-front discounts off its standard prices at the beginning of a generic campaign launch for a newly-approved or newly-introduced product, or when a customer purchases a Lannett product for the first time. Customers generally inform the Company that such purchases represent an estimate of expected resale for a period of time. This period of time is generally up to three months. The Company records this revenue, net of any discounts offered and accepted by its customers at the time of shipment. The Companys products generally have either 24 months or 36 months of shelf-life at the time of manufacture. The Company monitors its customers purchasing trends to attempt to identify any significant lapses in purchasing activity. If the Company observes a lack of recent activity, inquiries will be made to such customer regarding the success of the customers resale efforts. The Company attempts to minimize any potential return (or shelf life issues) by maintaining an active dialogue with the customers.
The products that the Company sells are generic versions of brand named drugs. The consumer markets for such drugs are well-established markets with many years of historically-confirmed consumer demand. Such consumer demand may be affected by several factors, including alternative treatments and costs, etc. However, the effects of changes in such consumer demand for the Companys products, like generic products manufactured by other generic companies, are gradual in nature. Any overall decrease in consumer demand for generic products generally occurs over an extended period of time. This is because there are thousands of doctors, prescribers, third-party payers, institutional formularies and other buyers of drugs that must change prescribing habits and medicinal practices before such a decrease would affect a generic drug market. If the historical data the Company uses and the assumptions management makes to calculate its estimates of future returns, chargebacks, and other credits do not accurately approximate future activity, its net sales, gross profit, net income and earnings per share could change. However, management believes that these estimates are reasonable based upon historical experience and current conditions.
Cash and cash equivalents - The Company considers all highly liquid securities purchased with original maturities of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates market value, and consist of certificates of deposit that are readily converted to cash. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents with several major financial institutions.
Accounts Receivable - The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customers current credit worthiness, as determined by a review of current credit information. The Company continuously monitors collections and payments from its customers and maintains a provision for estimated credit losses based upon
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that have been identified. While such credit losses have historically been within both the Companys expectations and the provisions established, the Company cannot guarantee that it will continue to experience the same credit loss rates that it has in the past.
Inventories - The Company values its inventory at the lower of cost (determined by the first-in, first-out method) or market, regularly reviews inventory quantities on hand, and records a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on estimated forecasts of product demand and production requirements. The Companys estimates of future product demand may fluctuate, in which case estimated required reserves for excess and obsolete inventory may increase or decrease. If the Companys inventory is determined to be overvalued, the Company reduces the inventory value and recognizes such costs in cost of goods sold at the time of such determination. Likewise, if inventory is determined to be undervalued, the Company may have recognized excess cost of goods sold in previous periods and would recognize such additional operating income at the time of sale.
Property, Plant and Equipment - Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided for by the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Depreciation expense for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $1,072 and $913, respectively. Depreciation expense for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $2,150 and $1,864, respectively.
Investment Securities The Companys investment securities consist of equity securities. The Companys equity securities are classified as trading. Investment securities are recorded at fair value based on quoted market prices. For trading investments, unrealized holding gains and losses are recorded on the consolidated statements of operations. No gains or losses on investment securities are realized until they are sold or a decline in fair value is determined to be other-than-temporary. The Company reviews its investment securities and determines whether the investments are other-than-temporarily impaired. If the investments are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, the investments are written down to their then current fair market value with a new cost basis being established. There were no securities determined by management to be other-than-temporarily impaired during the six months ended December 31, 2012 or the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
Shipping and Handling Costs The cost of shipping products to customers is recognized at the time the products are shipped, and is included in cost of sales.
Research and Development Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred.
Intangible Assets Indefinite-lived and definite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over the estimated useful lives, generally for periods ranging from 10 to 15 years. The Company continually evaluates the reasonableness of the useful lives of these assets.
Impairments An impairment loss is measured as the excess of the assets carrying value over its fair value, calculated using a discounted future cash flow method. Our discounted cash flow models are highly reliant on various assumptions which are considered level 3 inputs, including estimates of future cash flow (including long-term growth rates), discount rate, and expectations about variations in the amount and timing of cash flows and the probability of achieving the estimated cash flows.
Advertising Costs - The Company charges advertising costs to operations as incurred. Advertising expense for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $10 and $18, respectively.
Income Taxes - The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC 740. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates which will be in effect when these differences reverse. Deferred tax expense/(benefit) is the result of changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities. The Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position claimed on a tax return only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The authoritative standards issued by the FASB also provide guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization are the Companys forecast of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets. Failure to achieve forecasted taxable
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
income in applicable tax jurisdictions could affect the ultimate realization of deferred tax assets and could result in an increase in the Companys effective tax rate on future earnings.
Segment Information The Company operates one business segment - generic pharmaceuticals; accordingly the Company aggregates its financial information for all products and reports one reporting segment. The following table identifies the Companys approximate net product sales by medical indication for the three and six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:
(In thousands) |
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
Medical Indication |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Migraine Headache |
|
$ |
1,447 |
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
$ |
2,696 |
|
$ |
3,159 |
|
Glaucoma |
|
1,608 |
|
1,068 |
|
2,981 |
|
2,100 |
| ||||
Gallstone Prevention |
|
1,708 |
|
1,567 |
|
3,286 |
|
2,867 |
| ||||
Cardiovascular |
|
7,269 |
|
2,952 |
|
14,369 |
|
5,462 |
| ||||
Thyroid Deficiency |
|
14,474 |
|
11,211 |
|
28,111 |
|
24,246 |
| ||||
Antibiotic |
|
1,082 |
|
1,457 |
|
2,771 |
|
3,136 |
| ||||
Pain Management |
|
4,240 |
|
5,257 |
|
9,772 |
|
10,566 |
| ||||
Obesity |
|
1,104 |
|
1,044 |
|
2,414 |
|
1,591 |
| ||||
Other |
|
3,632 |
|
1,631 |
|
5,458 |
|
3,485 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
36,564 |
|
$ |
27,734 |
|
$ |
71,858 |
|
$ |
56,612 |
|
Concentration of Market and Credit Risk The following table identifies certain of the Companys products, defined as generics containing the same active ingredient or combination of ingredients, which accounted for greater than 10% of net sales in either of the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product 1 |
|
40 |
% |
40 |
% |
39 |
% |
43 |
% |
Product 2 |
|
12 |
% |
1 |
% |
11 |
% |
1 |
% |
Product 3 |
|
10 |
% |
8 |
% |
9 |
% |
10 |
% |
The following table identifies certain of the Companys customers which accounted for greater than 10% of net sales in either of the three and six month periods ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer A |
|
16 |
% |
17 |
% |
17 |
% |
19 |
% |
Customer B |
|
13 |
% |
11 |
% |
12 |
% |
11 |
% |
Customer C |
|
10 |
% |
19 |
% |
10 |
% |
15 |
% |
At December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, four customers accounted for 66% of the Companys accounts receivable balances, respectively. Credit terms are offered to customers based on evaluations of the customers financial condition. Generally, collateral is not required from customers. Accounts receivable payment terms vary and are stated in the financial statements at amounts due from customers net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts remaining outstanding longer than the payment terms are considered past due. The Company determines its allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, the Companys previous loss history, the customers current ability to pay its obligation to the Company, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes-off accounts receivable when they are determined to have become uncollectible.
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
Share-based Compensation - Share-based compensation costs are recognized over the vesting period based on the fair value of the instrument on the date of grant less an estimate for forfeitures. The Company uses the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine the fair value of stock options and the share price on the grant date to value restricted stock. The fair value model includes various assumptions, including the expected volatility, expected life of the awards, and risk-free interest rates. These assumptions involve inherent uncertainties based on market conditions which are generally outside the Companys control. Changes in these assumptions could have a material impact on share-based compensation costs recognized in the financial statements.
Note 3. New Accounting Standards
In June 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which allows an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both options, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders equity. This guidance does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. This authoritative guidance must be applied retrospectively, and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. In December 2011, the FASB issued an update deferring the effective date for amendments to the presentation of reclassifications of items out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The adoption of this guidance by the Company on July 1, 2012 did not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements as it only requires a change in the format of the presentation.
In July 2012, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which allows an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. An entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test. An entity will be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entitys financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The Company adopted this guidance effective July 1, 2012. The adoption of this guidance by the Company did not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Note 4. Inventories
Inventories at December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012 consist of the following:
(In thousands) |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
| ||
Raw Materials |
|
$ |
13,634 |
|
$ |
11,351 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
5,129 |
|
4,805 |
| ||
Finished Goods |
|
9,538 |
|
9,130 |
| ||
Packaging Supplies |
|
2,387 |
|
1,778 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
30,688 |
|
$ |
27,064 |
|
The preceding amounts are net of excess and obsolete inventory reserves of $1,021 and $1,472 at December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, respectively.
Recently, the FDA increased its efforts to force companies to file and seek FDA approval for GRASE or Grandfathered products. GRASE products are those old drugs that do not require prior approval from FDA in order to be marketed because they are generally recognized as safe and effective based on published scientific literature. Similarly, Grandfathered products are those which entered the market before the passage of the 1906 Act, the 1938 Act or the 1962 amendments to the Act. Efforts have included issuing notices to discontinue marketing certain products to companies currently producing these products. Lannett currently manufactures and markets two products that are considered GRASE or Grandfathered products, including C-Topical Solution and Oxycodone
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
HCl Oral Solution through October 2012. The FDA is currently undertaking activities to force all companies who manufacture such products to file applications and seek approval for these types of products or remove them from the market. The Company had approximately $320 and $1,703 of net inventory value of other Grandfathered products at December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, respectively.
Note 5. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment at December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012 consist of the following:
(In thousands) |
|
Useful Lives |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
| ||
Land |
|
|
|
$ |
1,279 |
|
$ |
1,350 |
|
Building and improvements |
|
10 - 39 years |
|
28,768 |
|
28,420 |
| ||
Machinery and equipment |
|
5 - 10 years |
|
33,023 |
|
32,322 |
| ||
Furniture and fixtures |
|
5 - 7 years |
|
1,285 |
|
1,247 |
| ||
Construction in progress |
|
|
|
4,924 |
|
2,159 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
69,279 |
|
65,498 |
| ||
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
(30,403 |
) |
(28,430 |
) | ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
$ |
38,876 |
|
$ |
37,068 |
|
At December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, Property, plant and equipment, net included amounts held in foreign countries in the amount of $1,143 and $1,239, respectively.
Note 6. Fair Value Measures
The Company follows the authoritative guidance which clarifies the definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands the disclosures on fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The authoritative guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Three levels of inputs were established that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The fair value of the Companys equity securities classified as trading securities in Note 7 below are derived solely from Level 1 inputs.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; or model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable. The Companys Level 2 assets and liabilities primarily include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments, corporate bonds, U.S. government and agency securities and certain mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities whose values are determined using pricing models with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. The Company did not have any Level 2 assets or liabilities as of December 31, 2012 or June 30, 2012.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are financial instruments whose values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. The Company did not have any Level 3 assets or liabilities as of December 31, 2012 or June 30, 2012.
If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
The carrying value of certain financial instruments, primarily cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses approximate their estimated fair values based upon the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying amount of the Companys debt obligations approximates fair value based on current rates available to the Company on similar debt obligations.
Note 7. Investment Securities
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of the Companys investment securities as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012:
December 31, 2012
(In thousands) |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
Gross |
|
Fair Value |
| ||||
Trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Equity securities |
|
$ |
6,636 |
|
$ |
191 |
|
$ |
(189 |
) |
$ |
6,638 |
|
June 30, 2012
(In thousands) |
|
Amortized Cost |
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
Gross |
|
Fair Value |
| ||||
Trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Equity securities |
|
$ |
6,874 |
|
$ |
157 |
|
$ |
(364 |
) |
$ |
6,667 |
|
The Company uses the specific identification method to determine the cost of securities sold. For the three months ended December 31, 2012 the Company had gains on investments of $71, of which $132 were realized gains and $61 were unrealized losses. For the three months ended December 31, 2011, the Company had gains on investments of $702, of which $27 were realized gains and $675 were unrealized gains. For the six months ended December 31, 2012 the Company had gains on investments of $305, of which $96 were realized gains and $209 were unrealized gains. For the six months ended December 31, 2011, the Company had losses on investments of $297, of which $146 were realized losses and $151 were unrealized losses.
As of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, there were no securities held from a single issuer that represented more than 10% of shareholders equity. As of December 31, 2012, securities with an aggregate fair value of $2,982 were in an unrealized loss position totaling $189. As of June 30, 2012, securities with an aggregate fair value of $3,466 were in an unrealized loss position totaling $364. No securities were in a continuous unrealized loss position for more than 12 months as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012.
Note 8. Other Assets
As of July 24, 2010, Lannett stopped manufacturing and distributing Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution (MS). Lannett filed a 505(b)(2) New Drug Application (MS NDA) in February 2010. Lannett met with the FDA in January 2011 to review the status of the application. At that time, the FDA stated that it will need to finalize its Establishment Inspection Report for the February 2011 inspection of Lannetts facilities before it could give final approval on the MS NDA. The Company received FDA approval in June 2011. The filing fee related to this application totaled $1,406 and was initially recorded within other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets because the fee was thought to be refundable.
In March 2011 and September 2012, the Company had further communications with the FDA regarding the refundable portion of the filing fee. During December 2012, $584 of the filing fee was returned to the Company. Of the original $1,406 filing fee, the Company has reclassified $398 to intangible assets and received $584 as a refund from the FDA. Based on communications with the FDA, the Company continues to believe that the remaining $424 of the filing fee is refundable, and therefore is recorded in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet.
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
The Companys position has been that the value related to the nonrefundable portion of the filing fee is the cost of getting regulatory approval for its MS product and that this value should be properly recorded as an intangible asset upon approval and shipment of the product. The intangible asset would then be amortized over the products estimated useful life. As a result of the FDA approval of the MS NDA, an estimate of the nonrefundable amount totaling $398, determined based upon input from a third party analysis, was reclassified to intangible assets upon shipment of the product which commenced in August 2011. Amortization will be adjusted prospectively, if needed, once the nonrefundable portion of the fee is finalized with the FDA.
Note 9. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets, net as of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, consist of the following:
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount |
|
Accumulated Amortization |
|
Intangible Assets, Net |
| ||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
JSP Marketing and Dist. Rights |
|
$ |
16,062 |
|
$ |
16,062 |
|
$ |
(13,831 |
) |
$ |
(12,939 |
) |
$ |
2,231 |
|
$ |
3,123 |
|
Cody Labs Import License |
|
582 |
|
582 |
|
(173 |
) |
(154 |
) |
409 |
|
428 |
| ||||||
Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution NDA |
|
398 |
|
398 |
|
(38 |
) |
(24 |
) |
360 |
|
374 |
| ||||||
Other ANDA Product Rights(A) |
|
600 |
|
600 |
|
(112 |
) |
(96 |
) |
488 |
|
504 |
| ||||||
|
|
$ |
17,642 |
|
$ |
17,642 |
|
$ |
(14,154 |
) |
$ |
(13,213 |
) |
$ |
3,488 |
|
$ |
4,429 |
|
(A) The amounts above include the product line covered by the ANDAs purchased in August 2009 for $149. These ANDAs are not being amortized at this time and will continue to be un-amortized intangible assets until such time as the Company begins shipping these products.
The following table summarizes intangible assets, net activity
(In thousands) |
|
Intangible assets, net |
| |
Balances at July 1, 2012 |
|
$ |
4,429 |
|
Additions |
|
|
| |
Amortization |
|
(941 |
) | |
Impairments |
|
|
| |
Balances at December 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
3,488 |
|
There were no impairments related to intangible assets during the three and six months ended December 31, 2012 or the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
For the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company incurred amortization expense of approximately $470. For the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company incurred amortization expense of approximately $941 and $938, respectively.
Future annual amortization expense consists of the following as of December 31, 2012:
(In thousands) |
|
Annual Amortization Expense |
| |
2013 |
|
$ |
941 |
|
2014 |
|
1,435 |
| |
2015 |
|
97 |
| |
2016 |
|
97 |
| |
2017 |
|
97 |
| |
Thereafter |
|
672 |
| |
|
|
$ |
3,339 |
|
The amounts above do not include the product line covered by the ANDAs purchased in August 2009 for $149, as amortization will begin when the Company starts shipping these products.
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
Note 10. Bank Line of Credit
The Company has a $3,000 line of credit from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo) that was scheduled to expire on March 31, 2012. The line of credit was renewed and extended until April 30, 2013 and bears interest of 1-month LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 2.00%. The interest rate at December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012 was 2.21% and 2.22%. Availability under the line of credit is reduced by outstanding letters of credit. As of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, the Company had $3,000 and $2,995 of availability under the line of credit, respectively. The availability fee on the unused balance of the line of credit is 0.375%. The line of credit is collateralized by the working capital assets of the Company. As of December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the agreement.
Note 11. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
| ||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2012 |
| ||
Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority loan |
|
$ |
737 |
|
$ |
777 |
|
Tax-exempt bond loan (PAID) |
|
290 |
|
290 |
| ||
Wells Fargo N.A. Townsend Road mortgage |
|
2,716 |
|
2,818 |
| ||
PIDA Townsend Road mortgage |
|
1,847 |
|
1,899 |
| ||
First National Bank of Cody mortgage |
|
1,319 |
|
1,377 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total debt |
|
6,909 |
|
7,161 |
| ||
Less current portion |
|
654 |
|
648 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long term debt |
|
$ |
6,255 |
|
$ |
6,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Portion of Long Term Debt |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2012 |
| ||
Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority loan |
|
$ |
83 |
|
$ |
81 |
|
Tax-exempt bond loan (PAID) |
|
140 |
|
140 |
| ||
Wells Fargo N.A. Townsend Road mortgage |
|
204 |
|
204 |
| ||
PIDA Townsend Road mortgage |
|
107 |
|
105 |
| ||
First National Bank of Cody mortgage |
|
120 |
|
118 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total current portion of long term debt |
|
$ |
654 |
|
$ |
648 |
|
The Company financed $1,250 through the Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority (PIDA). The Company is required to make equal payments each month for 180 months starting February 1, 2006 with interest of 2.75% per annum.
In April 1999, the Company entered into a loan agreement with a governmental authority, the Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development (the Authority or PAID), to finance future construction and growth projects of the Company. The Authority issued $3,700 in tax-exempt variable rate demand and fixed rate revenue bonds to provide the funds to finance such growth projects pursuant to a trust indenture (the Trust Indenture). A portion of the Companys proceeds from the bonds was used to pay for bond issuance costs of approximately $170. The Trust Indenture requires that the Company repay the Authority loan through installment payments beginning in May 2003 and continuing through May 2014, the year the bonds mature. The bonds bear interest at the floating variable rate determined by the organization responsible for selling the bonds. The interest rate fluctuates on a weekly basis. The effective interest rate at December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012 was 0.35% and 0.38%, respectively.
During the third and fourth quarters of Fiscal 2011, the Company negotiated a set of mortgages on its Townsend Road facility with both Wells Fargo and the PIDA. The Wells Fargo portion of the loan is for $3,056, bears a floating interest rate of the 1 Month LIBOR rate plus 2.95%, amortizes over a 15 year term and has an 8 year maturity date. The effective interest rate at December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012 was 3.16% and 3.20%, respectively. The PIDA portion of the loan is for $2,000, bears an interest rate of
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
3.75% and matures in 15 years. Both loans closed and were funded in May 2011. As of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, the Company was in compliance with the new financial covenants under the agreements.
The Company has executed Security Agreements with Wells Fargo, PIDA and Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation (PIDC) in which the Company has agreed to pledge its working capital, some equipment and its Townsend Road property to collateralize the amounts due.
The Company is the primary beneficiary to a variable interest entity (VIE) called Cody LCI Realty, LLC. See Note 12, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entity for additional description. The VIE owns land and a building which is being leased to Cody. A mortgage loan with First National Bank of Cody has been consolidated in the Companys financial statements, along with the related land and building. The mortgage requires monthly principal and interest payments of $15. Effective February 2011, the interest rate was modified from a fixed rate of 7.5% to a floating rate with a floor of 4.5% and a ceiling of 9.0%, with payments to be made through April 2022. As of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, the effective rate was 4.5%. The mortgage is collateralized by the land and building.
Long-term debt amounts due, for the twelve month periods ending December 31 are as follows:
|
|
Amounts Payable |
| |
(In thousands) |
|
to Institutions |
| |
|
|
|
| |
2013 |
|
$ |
654 |
|
2014 |
|
676 |
| |
2015 |
|
538 |
| |
2016 |
|
551 |
| |
2017 |
|
564 |
| |
Thereafter |
|
3,926 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
$ |
6,909 |
|
Note 12. Consolidation of Variable Interest Entity
Lannett consolidates any Variable Interest Entity (VIE) of which it is the primary beneficiary. The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating a VIE do not represent additional claims on the Companys general assets rather, they represent claims against the specific assets of the consolidated VIE. Conversely, assets recognized as a result of consolidating a VIE do not represent additional assets that could be used to satisfy claims against our general assets. Reflected in each of the December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012 balance sheets are consolidated VIE assets of approximately $1,651 and $1,757, respectively, which are comprised mainly of land and a building. VIE liabilities consist primarily of a mortgage on that property in the amount of $1,319 and $1,377 at December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2012, respectively.
Cody LCI Realty, LLC (Realty) is the only VIE that is consolidated. Realty had been consolidated by Cody prior to its acquisition by Lannett. Realty is a 50/50 owned limited liability company between Lannett and an officer of Cody Labs (Cody). Its purpose was to acquire the facility used by Cody. Until the acquisition of Cody in April 2007, Lannett had not consolidated the VIE because Cody had been the primary beneficiary of the VIE. Risk associated with our interests in this VIE is limited to a decline in the value of the land and building as compared to the balance of the mortgage note on that property, up to Lannetts 50% share of the venture. Realty owns the land and building, and Cody leases the building and property from Realty for $20 per month. All intercompany rent expense is eliminated upon consolidation with Cody. The Company is not involved in any other VIE.
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
Note 13. Contingencies
In January 2010, the Company initiated an arbitration proceeding against Olive Healthcare (Olive) for damages arising out of Olives delivery of defective soft-gel prenatal vitamin capsules. The Company sought damages in excess of $3,500. Olive denied liability and filed a counterclaim in February 2010 for breach of contract. Olive also filed a lawsuit against the Company in Daman, India seeking to enjoin the United States arbitration and claiming damages of approximately $6,800 for compensatory damages and an additional approximately $6,800 for loss of business. The Company engaged Indian counsel and actively defended that suit. The parties reached a settlement agreement which was signed and executed on August 13, 2012. The agreement is favorable to Lannett and includes the dismissal with prejudice of all legal proceedings between the Company and Olive in the U.S. and India. As of December 31, 2012, the Company had recorded all amounts related to the agreement.
Note 14. Commitments
Leases
Lannetts subsidiary, Cody leases a 73 square foot facility in Cody, Wyoming. This location houses Codys manufacturing and production facilities. Cody leases the facility from Cody LCI Realty, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company which is 50% owned by Lannett. See Note 12.
Rental and lease expense for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $28 and $22, respectively. Rental and lease expense for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $51 and $49, respectively.
Employment Agreements
The Company has entered into employment agreements with Arthur P. Bedrosian, President and Chief Executive Officer, Martin P. Galvan, Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, Kevin R. Smith, Vice President of Sales and Marketing, William F. Schreck, Chief Operating Officer, Ernest J. Sabo, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs and Chief Compliance Officer and Robert Ehlinger, Vice President of Logistics and Chief Information Officer. Each of the agreements provide for an annual base salary and eligibility to receive a bonus. The salary and bonus amounts of these executives are determined by the review and approval of the Compensation Committee in accordance with the Committees Charter as approved by the Board of Directors. Additionally, these executives are eligible to receive stock options and restricted stock awards, which are granted at the discretion of the Compensation Committee in accordance with the Committees Charter as approved by the Board of Directors and in accordance with the Companys policies regarding stock option and restricted stock grants. Under the agreements, these executive employees may be terminated at any time with or without cause, or by reason of death or disability. In certain termination situations, the Company is liable to pay severance compensation to these executives.
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
Note 15. Accumulated Comprehensive Loss
The Companys Accumulated Comprehensive Loss is comprised of the following components as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:
(In thousands) |
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
Foreign Currency Translation |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Beginning Balance, July 1 |
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
$ |
22 |
|
Net gain (loss) on foreign currency translation (net of tax of $0 and $0) |
|
37 |
|
(35 |
) | ||
Reclassifications to net income (net of tax of $0 and $0) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
37 |
|
(35 |
) | ||
Ending Balance, December 31 |
|
(26 |
) |
(13 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Unrealized Holding Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Beginning Balance, July 1 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) (net of tax of $0 and $1) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) | ||
Reclassifications to net income (net of tax of $0 and $0) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
|
(1 |
) | ||
Ending Balance, December 31 |
|
|
|
1 |
| ||
Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
$ |
(12 |
) |
Note 16. Earnings Per Common Share
A dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is required on the face of the Companys consolidated statement of operations as well as a reconciliation of the computation of basic earnings per common share to diluted earnings per common share. Basic earnings per common share excludes the dilutive impact of common stock equivalents and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share include the effect of potential dilution from the exercise of outstanding common stock equivalents into common stock using the treasury stock method. Dilutive shares have been excluded in the weighted average shares used for the calculation of earnings per share in periods of net loss because the effect of such securities would be anti-dilutive. A reconciliation of the Companys basic and diluted earnings per common share follows:
|
|
For The Three Months Ended December 31, |
| ||||
(In thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Income attributable to Lannett common shareholders |
|
$ |
2,881 |
|
$ |
609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (basic) |
|
28,347,464 |
|
28,526,658 |
| ||
Effect of potentially dilutive options and restricted stock awards |
|
103,133 |
|
246,819 |
| ||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (diluted) |
|
28,450,597 |
|
28,773,477 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
For The Six Months Ended December 31, |
| ||||
(In thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Income attributable to Lannett common shareholders |
|
$ |
5,807 |
|
$ |
815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (basic) |
|
28,312,989 |
|
28,479,195 |
| ||
Effect of potentially dilutive options and restricted stock awards |
|
111,038 |
|
254,240 |
| ||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (diluted) |
|
28,424,027 |
|
28,733,435 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
The number of anti-dilutive shares that have been excluded in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were 2,331 and 1,877, respectively. The number of anti-dilutive shares that have been excluded in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were 2,323 and 1,560, respectively.
Note 17. Share-based Compensation
At December 31, 2012, the Company had four share-based employee compensation plans (the Old Plan, the 2003 Plan, the 2006 Long-term Incentive Plan, or 2006 LTIP and the 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan or 2011 LTIP).
At December 31, 2012, there were 2,905 options outstanding. Of those, 1,570 were options issued under the 2006 LTIP, 852 were issued under the 2003 Plan, and 483 under the 2011 Plan. There are no further shares authorized to be issued under the Old Plan. Under the 2003 Plan, 1,125 shares were authorized to be issued, with 61 shares under options having already been exercised under that plan since its inception, leaving a balance of 212 shares in that plan for future issuances. The 2003 Plan expires on February 13, 2013 and will continue to exist only to administer existing outstanding options. Under the 2006 LTIP, 2,500 shares were authorized to be issued, with 218 shares under options having already been exercised and 708 shares of restricted stock having already vested under the plan since its inception. At December 31, 2012, a balance of 4 shares is available in the 2006 LTIP for future issuances.
Under the 2011 LTIP, 1,500 shares were authorized to be issued. As of December 31, 2012, 3 shares of restricted stock have vested under the plan, leaving a balance of 1,014 shares available in the 2011 LTIP for future issuances.
The following tables presents all share-based compensation costs recognized in our statements of income, substantially all of which is reflected in the selling, general and administrative expense line:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||||||||
(In thousands) |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Stock based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Stock options |
|
$ |
226 |
|
$ |
339 |
|
$ |
542 |
|
$ |
727 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
15 |
|
9 |
|
42 |
|
19 |
| ||||
Restricted stock |
|
41 |
|
143 |
|
356 |
|
416 |
| ||||
Tax benefit at statutory rate |
|
34 |
|
31 |
|
57 |
|
68 |
| ||||
Stock Options
The Company measures share-based compensation cost for options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following table presents the weighted average assumptions used to estimate fair values of the stock options granted during the six months ended December 31 and the estimated annual forfeiture rates used to recognize the associated compensation expense:
|
|
Incentive |
|
Non- |
|
Incentive |
|
Non- |
| ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
% |
1.0 |
% |
1.1 |
% |
1.0 |
% | ||||
Expected volatility |
|
|
% |
61.5 |
% |
63.6 |
% |
63.9 |
% | ||||
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
% |
|
% |
|
% |
|
% | ||||
Forfeiture rate |
|
|
% |
7.50 |
% |
7.50 |
% |
7.50 |
% | ||||
Expected term (in years) |
|
|
|
6.1 years |
|
5.2 years |
|
5.1 years |
| ||||
Weighted average fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2.36 |
|
$ |
2.02 |
|
$ |
1.98 |
|
Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the price of our common shares during the historical period equal to the expected term of the option. We use historical information to estimate expected term within the valuation model. The expected term of awards represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the expected life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Compensation cost is recognized using a straight-line method over the vesting or service period and is net of estimated forfeitures.
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
(In thousands, unless otherwise noted and per share data)
The forfeiture rate assumption is the estimated annual rate at which unvested awards are expected to be forfeited during the vesting period. This assumption is based on our historical forfeiture rate. Periodically, management will assess whether it is necessary to adjust the estimated rate to reflect changes in actual forfeitures or changes in expectations.
Options outstanding that have vested and are expected to vest as of December 31, 2012 are as follows:
(In thousands, except weighted average price and life data) |
|
Awards |
|
Weighted |
|
Aggregate |
|
Weighted |
| ||
Options vested |
|
1,812 |
|
$ |
7.19 |
|
$ |
824 |
|
5.12 |
|
Options expected to vest |
|
977 |
|
$ |
3.95 |
|
$ |
994 |
|
9.20 |
|
Total vested and expected to vest |
|
2,789 |
|
$ |
6.06 |
|
$ |
1,818 |
|
6.55 |
|
Options with a fair value of approximately $1,192 and $1,596 vested during the six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
A summary of stock option award activity under the Plans as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and changes during the six months then ended, is presented below:
|
|
Incentive Stock Options |
|
Nonqualified Stock Options |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Average |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
Remaining |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Intrinsic |
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Intrinsic |
|
Contractual |
| ||||
(In thousands, except for weighted average price and life data) |
|
Awards |
|
Price |
|
Value |
|
Life (yrs.) |
|
Awards |
|
Price |
|
Value |
|
Life (yrs.) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Outstanding at July 1, 2012 |
|
1,871 |
|
$ |
5.26 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
877 |
|
$ |
8.89 |
|
|
|
|
| |
Granted |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
536 |
|
$ |
4.16 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Exercised |
|
(73 |
) |
$ |
3.93 |
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Forfeited, expired or repurchased |
|
(161 |
) |
$ |
6.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
$ |
7.82 |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Outstanding at December 31, 2012 |
|
1,637 |
|
$ |
5.17 |
|
$ |
1,206 |
|
6.7 |
|
1,268 |
|
$ |
7.01 |
|
$ |
726 |
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2012 and not yet vested |
|
541 |
|
$ |
3.77 |
|
$ |
656 |
|
8.6 |
|
552 |
|
$ |
4.14 |
|
$ |
452 |
|
9.8 |
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2012 |
|
1,096 |
|
$ |
5.86 |
|
$ |
550 |
|
5.7 |
|
716 |
|
$ |
9.23 |
|
$ |
274 |
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
Incentive Stock Options |
|
Nonqualified Stock Options |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
| ||||
|
|
|
|