SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER NO: 0-11113
PACIFIC CAPITAL BANCORP
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
California | 95-3673456 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1021 Anacapa St. Santa Barbara, California |
93101 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(805) 564-6405
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Common Stock - As of April 25, 2007, there were 47,023,219 shares of the issuers common stock outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Forward-looking statements | 3 | |||||
Item 1. | Financial Statements: |
|||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
4 | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) |
5 | |||||
6 | ||||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) |
7 | |||||
8 | ||||||
The financial statements included in this Form 10-Q should be read with reference to Pacific Capital Bancorps Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. | ||||||
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
25 | ||||
Item 3. | 42 | |||||
Item 4. | 44 | |||||
45 | ||||||
Item 1. | 47 | |||||
Item 1A. | 47 | |||||
Item 2. | 47 | |||||
Item 3. | 47 | |||||
Item 4. | 47 | |||||
Item 5. | 47 | |||||
Item 6. | 48 | |||||
SIGNATURES |
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Certain statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as some statements by the Company in periodic press releases and some oral statements made by Company officials to securities analysts and shareholders during presentations about the Company, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements in these provisions. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including statements that relate to or are dependent on estimates or assumptions relating to the prospects of continued loan and deposit growth, improved credit quality, the health of the capital markets, the Companys de novo branching and acquisition efforts, the operating characteristics of the Companys income tax refund loan and transfer programs and the economic conditions within its markets. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Companys control. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include, among others, the following possibilities: (1) increased competitive pressure among financial services companies; (2) changes in the interest rate environment reducing interest margins or increasing interest rate risk; (3) deterioration in general economic conditions, internationally, nationally or in California; (4) the occurrence of terrorist acts; (5) reduced demand for or earnings derived from the Companys income tax refund loan and refund transfer programs; (6) legislative or regulatory changes or litigation adversely affecting the businesses in which the Company engages; (7) unfavorable conditions in the capital markets; (8) challenges in opening additional branches, integrating acquisitions or introducing new products or services; and (9) other risks detailed in reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made. For a more detailed description of the risk factors associated with the Companys businesses, please refer to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
The assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the Companys tax refund and transfer programs are reported in its periodic filings with the SEC as a segment of its business. Because these are activities conducted by very few other financial institutions, users of the financial statements have indicated that they are interested in information for the Company exclusive of these programs so that they may compare the results of operations with financial institutions that have no comparable programs. The amounts and ratios may generally be computed from the information provided in the note to its financial statements that discloses segment information, but are computed and included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the convenience of those users.
Purpose and Definition of Terms
The following provides Managements comments on the financial condition and results of operations of Pacific Capital Bancorp and its subsidiaries. Unless otherwise stated, the Company, we, us and our refers to this consolidated entity. We utilize the term Core Bank throughout this Form 10-Q. Core Bank is defined as our Consolidated financial results less the financial results from the RAL/RT Programs and is interchangeably referred to as, Excluding RAL/RT. You should read this discussion in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, herein referred to as 2006 10-K. Terms and acronyms used throughout this document are defined in the glossary on pages 45 through 46.
3
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS | Pacific Capital Bancorp and Subsidiaries |
(dollars and share amounts in thousands except per share amounts)
March 31, 2007 (unaudited) |
December 31, 2006 | |||||
Assets: |
||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 178,822 | $ | 154,182 | ||
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
998,147 | 1,167,142 | ||||
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market |
233,939 | | ||||
Loans |
5,530,942 | 5,718,833 | ||||
Less: allowance for credit losses |
63,204 | 64,671 | ||||
Net Loans |
5,467,738 | 5,654,162 | ||||
Premises, equipment and other long-term assets |
93,525 | 95,400 | ||||
Accrued interest receivable |
31,990 | 32,294 | ||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
153,225 | 154,069 | ||||
Other assets |
275,295 | 237,581 | ||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,432,681 | $ | 7,494,830 | ||
Liabilities: |
||||||
Deposits: |
||||||
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits |
$ | 1,194,922 | $ | 1,079,152 | ||
Interest-bearing deposits |
3,814,362 | 3,967,249 | ||||
Total deposits |
5,009,284 | 5,046,401 | ||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Federal funds purchased |
344,667 | 356,352 | ||||
Long-term debt and other borrowings |
1,263,949 | 1,391,704 | ||||
Obligations under capital lease |
9,523 | 9,468 | ||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
136,253 | 73,529 | ||||
Total liabilities |
6,763,676 | 6,877,454 | ||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||
Preferred stock no par value; shares authorized: 1,000; shares issued and outstanding: none |
| | ||||
Common stock (no par value; $0.25 per share stated value; 100,000 authorized; 46,973 outstanding at March 31, 2007 and 46,880 at December 31, 2006 |
11,748 | 11,725 | ||||
Surplus |
120,950 | 117,631 | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
10,734 | 10,178 | ||||
Retained earnings |
525,573 | 477,842 | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
669,005 | 617,376 | ||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 7,432,681 | $ | 7,494,830 | ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
OF INCOME (Unaudited) |
Pacific Capital Bancorp and Subsidiaries |
(dollars and share amounts in thousands except per share amounts)
For the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, | ||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||
Interest income: |
||||||
Loans |
$ | 232,635 | $ | 202,345 | ||
Securities |
12,989 | 14,620 | ||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
804 | 126 | ||||
Total interest income |
246,428 | 217,091 | ||||
Interest expense: |
||||||
Deposits |
35,422 | 25,528 | ||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Federal funds purchased |
6,844 | 5,165 | ||||
Long-term debt and other borrowings |
19,050 | 11,260 | ||||
Total interest expense |
61,316 | 41,953 | ||||
Net interest income |
185,112 | 175,138 | ||||
Provision for credit losses |
77,466 | 48,146 | ||||
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
107,646 | 126,992 | ||||
Non-interest income: |
||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
4,257 | 3,998 | ||||
Trust and investment advisory fees |
6,230 | 4,500 | ||||
Refund transfer fees |
39,218 | 39,454 | ||||
Other service charges, commissions and fees |
8,424 | 10,457 | ||||
Net gain on sale of tax refund loans (RALs) |
41,822 | 43,163 | ||||
Net gain on securities transactions |
1,941 | 147 | ||||
Other income |
2,362 | 2,172 | ||||
Total non-interest income |
104,254 | 103,891 | ||||
Non-interest expense: |
||||||
Salaries and benefits |
35,800 | 34,614 | ||||
Net occupancy expense |
5,309 | 4,815 | ||||
Equipment rental, depreciation, and maintenance |
2,466 | 2,412 | ||||
Refund program marketing and technology fees |
44,487 | 52,043 | ||||
Other expense |
26,832 | 29,130 | ||||
Total non-interest expense |
114,894 | 123,014 | ||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
97,006 | 107,869 | ||||
Provision for income taxes |
38,861 | 40,501 | ||||
Net income |
$ | 58,145 | $ | 67,368 | ||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 1.24 | $ | 1.44 | ||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 1.23 | $ | 1.43 | ||
Average number of sharesbasic |
46,953 | 46,668 | ||||
Average number of sharesdiluted |
47,345 | 47,096 | ||||
Dividends declared per share |
$ | 0.22 | $ | 0.22 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited) |
Pacific Capital Bancorp and Subsidiaries |
(dollars in thousands) | For the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2007 |
For the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2006 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Before-Tax Amount |
Tax (Benefit)/ Expense |
Net-of-Tax Amount |
Before-Tax Amount |
Tax (Benefit)/ Expense |
Net-of-Tax Amount |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 97,006 | $ | 38,861 | $ | 58,145 | $ | 107,869 | $ | 40,501 | $ | 67,368 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized (loss) gain on securities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period |
2,900 | 1,219 | 1,681 | (8,438 | ) | (3,548 | ) | (4,890 | ) | ||||||||||||
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (1) |
1,941 | 816 | 1,125 | 147 | 62 | 85 | |||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
959 | 403 | 556 | (8,585 | ) | (3,610 | ) | (4,975 | ) | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 97,965 | $ | 39,264 | $ | 58,701 | $ | 99,284 | $ | 36,891 | $ | 62,393 | |||||||||
(1) | The gain on sale of $1.9 million in the three-month period ended of March 31, 2007, includes $1.6 million of realized gain associated with the sale of the 2003 and 2004 leveraging strategy as disclosed in Note 4, Securities of our Consolidated Financial Statements. The remainder of the gain is from called securities during the quarter. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) |
Pacific Capital Bancorp and Subsidiaries |
For the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, |
||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 58,145 | $ | 67,368 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,575 | 3,120 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
1,524 | 1,176 | ||||||
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation |
(641 | ) | (495 | ) | ||||
Provision for credit losses |
77,466 | 48,146 | ||||||
Net amortization of discounts and premiums for securities and commercial paper |
(2,123 | ) | (942 | ) | ||||
Amortization of net deferred loan fees |
1,275 | 1,170 | ||||||
Change in accrued interest receivable and other assets |
(16,303 | ) | (1,604 | ) | ||||
Change in accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
28,088 | 1,755 | ||||||
Recognized gain on securities |
(1,941 | ) | (147 | ) | ||||
Increase in income taxes payable |
34,636 | 38,513 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
185,701 | 158,060 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from sales of securities |
314,772 | | ||||||
Proceeds from calls, maturities, and partial paydowns of AFS securities |
64,806 | 76,006 | ||||||
Purchase of AFS securities |
(205,559 | ) | (52,435 | ) | ||||
Net increase in loans made to customers |
(126,256 | ) | (130,791 | ) | ||||
FHLB stock purchases |
(21,456 | ) | (34,269 | ) | ||||
Net purchase of premises and equipment |
(2,856 | ) | (2,860 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided (used) in investing activities |
23,451 | (144,349 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in deposits |
(37,117 | ) | 206,074 | |||||
Net decrease in borrowings with maturities of 90 days or less |
(66,355 | ) | (187,316 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from long-term debt and other borrowings |
| 58,432 | ||||||
Payments on long-term debt and other borrowings |
(73,085 | ) | (78,085 | ) | ||||
Tax benefit of stock-based compensation |
641 | 495 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
1,818 | 1,299 | ||||||
Dividends paid |
(10,414 | ) | (10,314 | ) | ||||
Net cash used by financing activities |
(184,512 | ) | (9,415 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash and due from banks |
24,640 | 4,296 | ||||||
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period |
154,182 | 158,880 | ||||||
Cash and due from banks at end of period |
$ | 178,822 | $ | 163,176 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure: |
||||||||
Interest paid during period |
$ | 64,343 | $ | 44,850 | ||||
Income taxes paid (refunded) during period |
$ | 4,336 | $ | (392 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) |
Pacific Capital Bancorp and Subsidiaries |
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The financial statements and notes included in this Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Form 10-Q (10-Q) should be read with reference to Pacific Capital Bancorps Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (2006 10-K).
Nature of Operations
Pacific Capital Bancorp (the Company) also referred to within these financial statements as (we, our and us) is a bank holding company organized under the laws of California. Through its banking subsidiary, Pacific Capital Bank, N.A. (PCBNA or the Bank), the Company provides a full range of commercial and consumer banking services to households, professionals, and small to medium-sized businesses. The banking services include making commercial, leasing, consumer, commercial and residential real estate loans and Small Business Administration guaranteed loans. Deposits are accepted for checking, interest bearing checking (NOW), money market, savings, and certificate of deposit accounts. PCBNA also offers safe deposit boxes, travelers checks, money orders, foreign exchange services, and cashiers checks. A wide range of wealth management services is offered through the Wealth Management segment and through a wholly-owned subsidiary, Morton Capital Management (MCM), purchased in July 2006. PCBNA is also one of the largest nationwide providers of financial services related to the electronic filing of income tax returns that generate our refund anticipation loans (RAL) and refund transfers (RT) business lines.
PCBNA conducts its banking services under five brand names: Santa Barbara Bank & Trust (SBB&T), First National Bank of Central California (FNB), South Valley National Bank (SVNB), San Benito Bank (SBB) and First Bank of San Luis Obispo (FBSLO). The offices using the SBB&T brand are located in Santa Barbara, Ventura and Los Angeles Counties. Offices using FNB are located in the counties of Monterey and Santa Cruz. Offices in southern Santa Clara County use SVNB, offices in San Benito County are branded SBB and offices in San Luis Obispo County are branded FBSLO. These brand names were formerly the names of independent banks merged at various times and eventually into PCBNA. The offices of the former Pacific Crest Bank that were acquired in the purchase by the Company of Pacific Crest Capital Inc. (PCCI) described in Note 2, Mergers and Acquisitions of the 2006 10-K were merged into PCBNA and were formerly using the Pacific Capital Bank brand name. However, as of March 2007, they began to use the SBB&T brand name.
Basis of Presentation
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and conform to practices within the banking industry. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated.
The preparation of these unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements are in accordance with GAAP and requires Management to make certain adjustments, estimates and assumptions that are necessary for a fair statement of our financial results for the periods presented. These adjustments, estimates and assumptions are of normal recurring nature unless otherwise disclosed in the Form 10-Q. Management believes these adjustments, estimates and assumptions to be reasonably accurate. However, actual results may differ. The results of operations in the interim Consolidated Financial Statements do not necessarily indicate the financial results for the entire year. The interim Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with our 2006 10-K.
Certain amounts in the 2006 financial statements have been reclassified to be comparable with classifications used in the 2007 financial statements.
Consolidation of Subsidiaries
The Company has seven subsidiaries.
| PCBNA is a consolidated wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company referred to as PCBNA or the Bank. |
8
| SBB&T RAL Funding Corporation is a consolidated wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that is used in the securitization of RALs as described in Note 11, Securitizations and Servicing of Financial Assets in our 2006 10-K and Note 8, Refund Anticipation Loan and Refund Transfer Programs of our 10-Q. |
| Five wholly-owned unconsolidated subsidiaries used as business trusts in connection with issuance of trust-preferred securities that are described in Note 14, Long-term Debt and Other Borrowings to the Financial Statements of our 2006 10-K and Note 10, Long-term Debt and Other Borrowings of our 10-Q. |
PCBNA has one consolidated subsidiary, MCM that was purchased in July 2006 to increase our customer base for providing trust and investment advisory services. The Bank also retains ownership in several Low-Income Tax Housing Partnerships that generate tax credits, these are considered variable interest entities and they are not consolidated into our Financial Statements.
The accompanying unaudited condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required for complete financial statements. In the opinion of Management, all adjustments considered necessary have been reflected in the financial statements. However, the results of operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES REGARDING SPECIFIC ASSETS, LIABILITIES, AND INCOME STATEMENT ACCOUNTS
Except as noted below, the significant accounting policies for specific assets, liabilities and income statement accounts have not changed from those described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the 2006 10-K.
Loans held for sale
Loans identified as held for sale are comprised of assets previously classified as Loans that Management does not have the intent and/or ability to hold until maturity. Loans held for sale are valued at the lower of cost or market, less anticipated selling expenses, with adjustment, if any, recorded as a gain or loss on the sale of loans within non-interest income. The market value of the loans is determined on an aggregate basis.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 addresses how companies should measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value measure for recognition or disclosure purposes under U.S. GAAP. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company will adopt SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008, and is assessing the impact of the adoption of this Statement.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 would allow the Company an irrevocable election to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses on the elected items recognized in earnings at each reporting period. The fair value option may only be elected at the time of initial recognition of a financial asset or financial liability or upon the occurrence of certain specified events. The election is applied on an instrument by instrument basis, with a few exceptions, and is applied only to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments. SFAS 159 also provides expanded disclosure requirements regarding the effects of electing the fair value option on the financial statements. SFAS 159 is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating this Statement and has not yet determined the financial assets and liabilities, if any, for which the fair value option would be elected or the potential impact on the consolidated financial statements, if such election were made.
2. MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
The acquisitions of MCM in July 2006 and FBSLO in August 2005, are described in Note 2, Mergers and Acquisitions of the 2006 10-K. The Company has not disclosed pro forma financial information about combined operations as the acquisitions were not material to the Company as a whole.
9
3. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table presents a reconciliation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share. The denominator of the diluted earnings per share ratio includes the effect of dilutive securities. The only securities outstanding that are potentially dilutive are employee stock options and restricted stock grants.
(share and net income amounts in thousands) | Three-Month Periods | |||||
Basic Earnings Per Share |
Diluted Earnings Per Share | |||||
Period ended March 31, 2007 |
||||||
Numerator Net income |
$ | 58,145 | $ | 58,145 | ||
Denominator weighted average shares outstanding |
46,953 | 46,953 | ||||
Plus: net shares issued in assumed stock based compensation |
392 | |||||
Diluted denominator |
47,345 | |||||
Earnings per share |
$ | 1.24 | $ | 1.23 | ||
Anti-dilutive options excluded |
214 | |||||
Period ended March 31, 2006 |
||||||
Numerator Net income |
$ | 67,368 | $ | 67,368 | ||
Denominator weighted average shares outstanding |
46,668 | 46,668 | ||||
Plus: net shares issued in assumed stock based compensation |
428 | |||||
Diluted denominator |
47,096 | |||||
Earnings per share |
$ | 1.44 | $ | 1.43 | ||
Anti-dilutive options excluded |
101 |
4. SECURITIES
A summary of securities owned by the Company at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, is as follows:
(dollars in thousands) | Amortized Cost |
Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||
March 31, 2007 |
|||||||||||||
Available-for-sale: |
|||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury obligations |
$ | 49,652 | $ | | $ | (281 | ) | $ | 49,371 | ||||
U.S. Agency obligations |
399,155 | 28 | (1,420 | ) | 397,763 | ||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
27,533 | 49 | (136 | ) | 27,446 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
289,286 | 612 | (6,144 | ) | 283,754 | ||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
2,671 | 6 | | 2,677 | |||||||||
State and municipal securities |
206,828 | 30,771 | (463 | ) | 237,136 | ||||||||
$ | 975,125 | $ | 31,466 | $ | (8,444 | ) | $ | 998,147 | |||||
10
Amortized Cost |
Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Estimated Fair Value | ||||||||||
December 31, 2006 |
|||||||||||||
Available-for-sale: |
|||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury obligations |
$ | 64,653 | $ | | $ | (504 | ) | $ | 64,149 | ||||
U.S. Agency obligations |
208,264 | | (2,032 | ) | 206,232 | ||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
64,833 | 31 | (880 | ) | 63,984 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
601,252 | 584 | (15,541 | ) | 586,295 | ||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
3,021 | 9 | | 3,030 | |||||||||
State and municipal securities |
211,817 | 32,114 | (479 | ) | 243,452 | ||||||||
$ | 1,153,840 | $ | 32,738 | $ | (19,436 | ) | $ | 1,167,142 | |||||
The mortgage-backed securities in the tables above primarily consist of securities issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises, specifically Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Federal Home Loan Banks.
We account for all of our securities in an available for sale portfolio, and the unrealized gains or losses are accounted for by placing the unrealized gain or loss in an asset account with a corresponding amount in other comprehensive income (OCI), which is then reduced by a deferred tax asset at our statutory tax rate of 42.05%. The fair value is based on current market prices obtained from independent sources for each security held. If a security is in an unrealized loss position for more than 12 months, Management is required to state whether or not each security is temporarily or permanently impaired.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company decided to sell a portion of the investment portfolio formerly referred to as the 2003 and 2004 leveraging strategy. In response to this change we marked the securities in this portfolio to market as of December 31, 2006 and recognized a loss of $8.8 million in non-interest income. During the first quarter of 2007, all of the securities from the 2003 and 2004 leveraging strategy were sold and the Company recognized a $1.6 million gain. The gain occurred due to a favorable change in the interest rate environment between December 31, 2006 and at the time of the sale of the leveraging portfolio in the first quarter of 2007.
The following table shows all securities that are in an unrealized loss position and temporarily impaired as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006.
As of March 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands) |
Less than 12 months | 12 months or more | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Unrealized Loss |
Fair Value | Unrealized Loss |
Fair Value | Unrealized Loss |
||||||||||||||||
US Treasury/US Agencies |
$ | 117,320 | $ | (102 | ) | $ | 221,648 | $ | (1,599 | ) | $ | 338,968 | $ | (1,701 | ) | ||||||
Mortgage Backed Securities |
22,069 | (118 | ) | 239,889 | (6,026 | ) | 261,958 | (6,144 | ) | ||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds |
8,053 | (31 | ) | 16,336 | (432 | ) | 24,389 | (463 | ) | ||||||||||||
Asset backed Securities |
| | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
48 | | 12,809 | (136 | ) | 12,857 | (136 | ) | |||||||||||||
Subtotal, Debt Securities |
147,490 | (251 | ) | 490,682 | (8,193 | ) | 638,172 | (8,444 | ) | ||||||||||||
Common Stock |
| | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities |
$ | 147,490 | $ | (251 | ) | $ | 490,682 | $ | (8,193 | ) | $ | 638,172 | $ | (8,444 | ) | ||||||
11
As of December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands) |
Less than 12 months | 12 months or more | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value |
Unrealized Loss |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Loss |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Loss |
||||||||||||||||
US Treasury/US Agencies |
$ | 19,688 | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 250,693 | $ | (2,514 | ) | $ | 270,381 | $ | (2,536 | ) | ||||||
Mortgage Backed Securities |
21,331 | (163 | ) | 536,029 | (15,378 | ) | 557,360 | (15,541 | ) | ||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds |
8,419 | (35 | ) | 16,326 | (444 | ) | 24,745 | (479 | ) | ||||||||||||
Asset backed Securities |
| | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
13,675 | (22 | ) | 48,458 | (858 | ) | 62,133 | (880 | ) | ||||||||||||
Subtotal, Debt Securities |
63,113 | (242 | ) | 851,506 | (19,194 | ) | 914,619 | (19,436 | ) | ||||||||||||
Common Stock |
| | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities |
$ | 63,113 | $ | (242 | ) | $ | 851,506 | $ | (19,194 | ) | $ | 914,619 | $ | (19,436 | ) | ||||||
The unrealized losses at March 31, 2007 of $8.4 million are largely a result of market interest rate fluctuations. The issuers of these securities have not, to our knowledge, established any cause for default on these securities and the various rating agencies have reaffirmed these securities long-term investment grade status at March 31, 2007. The Company has the ability and the intention to hold these securities until their fair values recover. As such, Management does not believe that there are any securities that are other-than-temporarily impaired as of March 31, 2007.
5. LOANS HELD FOR SALE
In March 2007, the Bank made the decision to cease origination of indirect auto loans and sell the existing portfolio. As of March 31, 2007, the Bank was actively seeking a buyer for the indirect auto loan portfolio and classified the qualifying loans in this portfolio as held for sale in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The carrying value of the indirect auto loan portfolio was $233.9 million as of March 31, 2007 based on our lower of cost or market analysis. The carrying value includes $4.3 million of allowance for credit losses, unamortized loan origination cost and fees and, dealer simple interest receivable associated with the indirect auto loans held for sale.
We have excluded $5.3 million of indirect auto loans from loans held for sale that are 30 days or more past due and their associated allowance for credit losses of $3.1 million as the bids obtained for this portfolio have specifically excluded past due loans. These indirect auto loans remain within the Loans classification on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We do not anticipate recording a material gain or loss on the sale of the indirect auto loan portfolio. The realized gain or loss associated with the sale of this portfolio will be reported in non-interest income upon the completion of the sale. We anticipate the sale to be completed during the second quarter of 2007.
12
6. LOANS
The loans held for investment portfolio consists of the following:
(dollars in thousands) | March 31, 2007 |
December 31, 2006 | ||||
Real estate: |
||||||
Residential |
$ | 1,456,290 | $ | 1,393,681 | ||
Multi-family residential |
287,187 | 287,626 | ||||
Non-residential |
1,243,983 | 1,226,439 | ||||
Construction |
544,803 | 536,443 | ||||
Commercial loans |
1,032,410 | 1,072,831 | ||||
Home equity loans |
373,028 | 372,637 | ||||
Consumer loans |
199,208 | 527,751 | ||||
Tax refund loans (RALs) |
108,629 | | ||||
Leases |
282,857 | 297,526 | ||||
Other loans |
2,547 | 3,899 | ||||
Total loans |
5,530,942 | 5,718,833 | ||||
Allowance for credit losses |
63,204 | 64,671 | ||||
Net loans |
$ | 5,467,738 | $ | 5,654,162 | ||
The amounts above are shown net of deferred loan origination, commitment and extension fees and origination costs of $6.5 million as of March 31, 2007 and $7.1 million as of December 31, 2006. The indirect auto loans with a value of $233.9 million as of March 31, 2007, are reported as loans held for sale and are not included in the above table. A description of the indirect auto loans reported as held for sale is in Note 5, Loans held for sale of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Impaired Loans
The table below discloses information about the loans classified as impaired and the valuation allowance related to them:
(dollars in thousands) | March 31, 2007 |
December 31, 2006 | ||||
Impaired loans for which a valuation allowance has been established |
$ | 2,951 | $ | | ||
Impaired loans for which no valuation allowance has been established |
4,705 | 19,887 | ||||
Loans identified as impaired |
$ | 7,656 | $ | 19,887 | ||
Valuation allowance for impaired loans |
$ | 244 | $ | |
13
A valuation allowance is established for an impaired loan when the fair value of the loan is less than the recorded investment. The valuation allowance amounts disclosed above are included in the allowance for credit losses reported in the balance sheets for March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006. Impaired loans for which no valuation allowance has been established has decreased $15.2 million since December 31, 2006. The decrease of $12.2 million of impaired loans from December 31, 2006 to March 31, 2007 is mostly attributed to two large loans with the same borrower, one loan was paid-off during the quarter and the other is no longer considered to be impaired.
Below is the average balance and interest recognized for impaired loans for the first quarter of 2007 and 2006.
(dollars in thousands) | Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, | |||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||
Average amount of recorded investment in impaired loans for the period |
$ | 13,685 | $ | 47,119 | ||
Interest recognized during the period for impaired loans |
$ | 182 | $ | 690 |
The decrease of $33.4 million in the average balance of impaired loans is due to a combination of several large loans that were either paid-off or were subsequently upgraded since March 31, 2006.
Refund Anticipation Loans
The discussion of the RALs and the securitization of RALs are discussed in Note 8, Refund Anticipation Loan and Refund Transfer Programs of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Pledged Loans
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 loans secured by first trust deeds on residential and commercial property with principal balances totaling $916.3 million and $925.0 million, respectively were pledged as collateral to the FRB and $2.33 billion and $2.13 billion, respectively were pledged to FHLB.
These amounts pledged do not represent the amount of outstanding borrowings that are required to be supported by collateral. The Company borrows extensively during the first quarter of each year to fund its RAL Program and borrows funds throughout the year to fund loans held in our portfolio.
Letters and Lines of Credit
In order to meet the financing needs of its customers in the normal course of business, the Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. These financial instruments consist of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.
Lines of credit are obligations to lend money and may include borrowers whose financial condition may indicate less ability to pay than when the commitment was originally made. In the case of standby letters of credit, this risk arises from the possibility of the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of a contract. In such a situation the third party might draw on the standby letter of credit to pay for completion of the contract and the Company would have to look to its customer to repay these funds to the Company with interest. To minimize the risk, the Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it would for a loan to that customer.
14
The maximum non-discounted exposure to credit risk is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The majority of the commitments are for one year or less. The majority of the credit lines and commitments may be withdrawn by the Company and they are subject to applicable legal requirements. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the contractual notional amounts of these instruments are as follows:
(dollars in thousands) | As of March 31, 2007 | As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
Less than one year |
One to three years |
Three to five years |
More than five years |
Total | ||||||||||||||
Commercial lines of credit |
$ | 301,160 | $ | 96,978 | $ | 28,688 | $ | 94,767 | $ | 521,593 | $ | 510,428 | ||||||
Consumer lines of credit |
4,122 | 8,351 | 21,254 | 335,052 | 368,779 | 365,647 | ||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees |
66,280 | 36,661 | 21,896 | 21,374 | 146,211 | 131,368 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 371,562 | $ | 141,990 | $ | 71,838 | $ | 451,193 | $ | 1,036,583 | $ | 1,007,443 | ||||||
The Company anticipates that a majority of the above commitments will not be fully drawn on by customers. Consumers do not tend to borrow the maximum amounts available under their home equity lines and businesses typically arrange for credit lines in excess of their expected needs to handle contingencies. A majority of the lines of credit are adjustable rate loans that are tied to prime or a base-lending rate. If a rate is fixed on a line of credit, the commitments are not usually for more than three months.
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party in borrowing arrangements. The Company generally has recourse to recover from the customer any amounts paid under these guarantees. Most of the guarantees are fully collateralized by the same types of assets used as loan collateral, however several are unsecured. The Company has recorded a $449,000 liability associated with these guarantees at March 31, 2007.
15
7. ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The following summarizes the changes in the allowance for credit losses:
(dollars in thousands) | Consolidated | Excluding RAL |
RAL | |||||||||
Balance, beginning of quarter |
$ | 64,671 | $ | 64,669 | $ | 2 | ||||||
Provision for credit losses |
77,466 | 7,120 | 70,346 | |||||||||
Recoveries added to allowance |
24,139 | 2,979 | 21,160 | |||||||||
Credit losses charged against allowance |
(98,736 | ) | (14,836 | ) | (83,900 | ) | ||||||
Allowance for indirect auto loans reclassified as held for sale |
(4,336 | ) | (4,336 | ) | | |||||||
Balance, March 31, 2007 |
$ | 63,204 | $ | 55,596 | $ | 7,608 | ||||||
Balance, beginning of quarter |
$ | 55,598 | $ | 55,598 | $ | | ||||||
Provision for credit losses |
48,146 | 1,975 | 46,171 | |||||||||
Recoveries added to allowance |
15,719 | 2,525 | 13,194 | |||||||||
Credit losses charged against allowance |
(64,787 | ) | (10,742 | ) | (54,045 | ) | ||||||
Balance, March 31, 2006 |
$ | 54,676 | $ | 49,356 | $ | 5,320 | ||||||
The provision for credit losses for the RAL program is discussed in Note 8, Refund Anticipation Loan and Refund Transfer Programs of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company has exposure to credit losses from extending loan commitments and letters of credit as well as from loans and leases. Because funds have not yet been disbursed on these commitments and letters of credit, the face amount is not included in the amounts reported for loans and leases outstanding. Consequently, any amount provided for credit losses related to these instruments is not included in the allowance for credit losses reported in the table above, but is instead accounted for as a loss contingency and a liability on the balance sheet. The recording of this separate liability is accomplished by a charge to other non-interest expense.
The table below shows activity for this liability for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:
(dollars in thousands) | For the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, |
||||||
2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Beginning estimate |
$ | 1,448 | $ | 1,685 | |||
Additions and (Reductions) |
103 | (645 | ) | ||||
Ending estimate |
$ | 1,551 | $ | 1,040 | |||
8. REFUND ANTICIPATION LOAN AND REFUND TRANSFER PROGRAMS
RAL/RT Programs
Note 15, Segment Reporting of these Consolidated Financial Statements provides the financial impact of the RAL/RT programs. The RAL/RT Programs are highly seasonal. Approximately 90% of the activity occurs in the first quarter of each year which causes the first quarter segment reporting to appear as if the RAL/RT Programs are the Companys main source of income. As the year progresses, the RAL/RT Programs impact on the Companys consolidated financial results becomes less apparent since, historically the RAL/RT Programs have not contributed a significant amount of income in the three remaining quarters of the year. For the first quarter of 2007, the
16
RAL/RT Programs net income before tax and after net credit or charge for funds was $62.9 million compared to $87.6 million for the first quarter of 2006. The main drivers of the RAL/RT Programs are fees earned on these products. The fees earned on RALs are reported in interest income while the fees earned on RTs are reported in non-interest income.
Refund Anticipation Loans
RALs are short-term consumer loans offered to taxpayers, secured by their anticipated tax refund and subject to an underwriting process prior to approval. RALs are offered during the tax-filing season of January through April of each year. RALs are repaid directly by the IRS to the Company once the tax return has been processed. Funds received from the IRS above the RAL plus associated fees are remitted to the taxpayer by the Company. The funds advanced are generally repaid within several weeks. Therefore, the processing costs and provision for loan loss represent the major costs of the loans. This is in contrast to other loans for which the cost of funds is the major cost to the Company. Because of their short duration, the Company cannot recover the processing costs through interest calculated over the term of the loan. Consequently, the Company has a tiered fee schedule for this service. The larger the loan, the larger the amount at risk from nonpayment and therefore the fee varies by the amount of funds advanced due to the increased credit risk rather than the length of time that the loan is outstanding. Nonetheless, because the customer signs a loan application and note, the Company reports the fees received for the RALs as interest income. Net interest income for RALs was $114.4 million in the first quarter of 2007 and $108.0 million for the first quarter of 2006.
As of March 31, 2007, we had $108.6 million of RAL loans remaining on our balance sheet. The remaining balance of RALs as of March 31, 2007 represents the balance of RALs the Company has estimated to be collectable prior to the end of the year. This balance is higher than in prior years due to increased fraud screening by the IRS. Any loan balance for which repayment has not been received by the end of the year is charged off. Therefore, no RALs were reported as of December 31, 2006.
Refund Transfer Fees
When customers do not choose or do not qualify for a RAL, they may still benefit from an expedited payment of their income tax refund. An RT is an electronic transfer of an income tax refund directly to the taxpayer. The Company acts as a conduit from the IRS to the taxpayer enabling a quick and safe delivery of the taxpayers income tax refund. There is no credit risk or borrowing cost for the Company because RTs are only delivered to the taxpayer upon receipt of the refund directly from the IRS. Payment of an RT is made in one of two ways. The Company either authorizes the tax preparer to provide a check directly to the taxpayer or the Company deposits the refund into a taxpayers account. Fees earned on RTs are recognized as fee income within non-interest income. RT fees earned for the first quarter of 2007 was $39.2 million compared to $39.5 million in the first quarter of 2006. The slight decrease in RT fees is due to lower than expected requests for RTs from users of tax preparation software.
Refund Anticipation Loan Securitizations
In December 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with other financial institutions to make use of Securitization financing for the 2007 RAL season by selling RALs into their multi-seller conduits or to the other institution directly. The terms of this agreement are substantially the same as the agreements used in prior years.
The Company has established a special purpose, wholly-owned subsidiary corporation named SBB&T RAL Funding Corporation to securitize RALs into multi-seller conduits, backed by commercial paper. PCBNA acted as the servicer for all such RALs during the securitization periods. These occur during the first quarter of each year. Generally, the conduit holds loans for only three or four weeks during January and February of each year. The Company has estimated the amount of subsequent recoveries on loans charged-off in the securitizations during the remainder of the year as part of the gain calculated below.
17
Below is a summary of the gain on sale of RAL loans sold into the securitizations for March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006:
(dollars in thousands) | For the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, |
|||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
RAL fees |
$ | 59,969 | $ | 60,867 | ||||
Fees paid to investor |
(2,383 | ) | (1,796 | ) | ||||
Commitment fees paid |
(1,575 | ) | (1,155 | ) | ||||
Credit losses |
(14,189 | ) | (14,753 | ) | ||||
Net gain on sale of RALs |
$ | 41,822 | $ | 43,163 | ||||
Provision for Credit Losses for RAL
Provision for credit losses increased by $29.3 million in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the first quarter of 2006. The increase is largely driven by the RAL program and Holiday loans. The RAL provision for credit losses was $70.3 million in the first quarter of 2007 compared to $46.2 million in the first quarter of 2006. The increase is largely driven by higher loss rates in the RAL pre-file product and higher incidences of fraud in all RAL business lines. The remainder of the increase in the provision for credit losses is mostly attributed to the Holiday loan program. Due to the higher loss rates on the RAL pre-file product and Holiday loans, the Company has decided to no longer offer these products.
The RAL pre-file product is a RAL product that is offered in advance of the taxpayers filing of their tax return, primarily in the month of January, for a portion of the anticipated refund amount. The loan is repaid upon a funded RAL or RT.
9. DEPOSITS
Deposits and the related interest expense consist of the following:
(dollars in thousands) | March 31, 2007 |
December 31, 2006 |
March 31, 2006 | ||||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
$ | 1,194,922 | $ | 1,079,152 | $ | 1,161,005 | |||
Interest-bearing deposits: |
|||||||||
NOW accounts |
1,169,867 | 1,186,352 | 1,363,548 | ||||||
Money market deposit accounts |
637,535 | 630,155 | 657,617 | ||||||
Other savings deposits |
287,099 | 275,910 | 343,198 | ||||||
Time certificates of $100,000 or more |
1,195,365 | 1,350,527 | 1,181,186 | ||||||
Other time deposits |
524,496 | 524,305 | 517,386 | ||||||
Total deposits |
$ | 5,009,284 | $ | 5,046,401 | $ | 5,223,940 | |||
Included in time certificates of $100,000 or more are $158.9 million of broker certificate of deposits.
18
(dollars in thousands) | Interest Expense on Deposits for the | |||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||
NOW accounts |
$ | 6,149 | $ | 4,521 | ||
Money market deposit accounts |
5,603 | 4,534 | ||||
Other savings deposits |
796 | 946 | ||||
Time certificates of $100,000 or more |
17,483 | 11,230 | ||||
Other time deposits |
5,391 | 4,297 | ||||
Total interest on deposits |
$ | 35,422 | $ | 25,528 | ||
Deposits decreased primarily due to the maturity of $154.8 million of broker time certificate of deposits entered into in the fourth quarter of 2006 of $313.8 million to provide funding of RALs during the first quarter of 2007. Interest expense on deposits increased during the three-month period ended March 31, 2007 compared to March 31, 2006 due to rising interest rates paid on deposits and an increase of $267.5 million in the average balance of time certificates of deposits in the two respective periods.
10. LONG-TERM DEBT AND OTHER BORROWINGS
Long-term debt and other borrowings include the following items:
(dollars in thousands) | March 31, 2007 |
December 31, 2006 | ||||
Long-term debt and other borrowings: |
||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
$ | 1,064,935 | $ | 1,088,203 | ||
Treasury Tax & Loan amounts due to Federal Reserve Bank |
67 | 104,492 | ||||
Subordinated debt issued by the Bank |
121,000 | 121,000 | ||||
Subordinated debt issued by the Company |
77,947 | 78,009 | ||||
Total Long-term debt and other borrowings |
1,263,949 | 1,391,704 | ||||
Obligation under capital lease |
9,523 | 9,468 | ||||
Total Long-term debt and other borrowings and obligations under capital lease |
$ | 1,273,472 | $ | 1,401,172 | ||
Treasury tax and loans with the Federal Reserve Bank have decreased $104.4 million since December 31, 2006. The main source of this change is from $100.0 million of short-term debt maturing on January 3, 2007 through the Term Investment Option (TIO) program. The TIO is an investment opportunity offered to participants that have treasury tax and loans with the Federal Reserve Bank. The U.S. Treasury will periodically auction excess operating funds to participants for a fixed term at a rate determined through a competitive bidding process. Included within the Treasury tax and loan amounts are payroll deposits made by employers to PCBNA for eventual payment to the IRS. PCBNA may hold these deposits and pay interest on them until called by the U.S. Treasury.
11. OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
All eligible retirees may obtain health insurance coverage through the Companys Retiree Health Plan. The Company is required to recognize the cost of the benefits as the eligible retirees earn them rather than when the benefits are paid. The commitment the Company has made to provide these benefits is recognized in the financial statements and they are described in detail in our Consolidated Financial Statements of our 2006 10-K in Note 15, Other Postretirement Benefits.
19
The amount of the periodic expense recognized in the three-month period ending March 31, 2007 and 2006 are disclosed in the following table.
(dollars in thousands) | For the Three- Month Periods Ended March 31, |
|||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Service cost |
$ | 346 | $ | 427 | ||||
Interest cost |
280 | 266 | ||||||
Return on assets |
(191 | ) | (167 | ) | ||||
Amortization cost |
11 | 90 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 446 | $ | 616 | ||||
12. INCOME TAXES
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007. This Interpretation provides guidance for accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in tax provisions and for the recognition and measurement related to the accounting for income taxes.
The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect to our financial statements. We have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our financial statements.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. Pursuant to the statute of limitations, the Company is open to audit by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for 2003-2006 tax years and by various state taxing authorities for 2002-2006 tax years. However, we currently do not have any examinations in progress or any inquiries from the IRS or states that would cause us to record an additional tax liability. We also do not believe there will be any material changes in our unrecognized tax positions over the next 12 months.
We may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by major tax jurisdictions, although any such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to our financial results. In the event we have an assessment from taxing authority, it is our accounting policy to recognize any interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense.
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Table of Contractual Lease Obligations
The following table shows the contractual lease obligations the Company is committed to make. The nature, business purpose, and significance of the items are discussed in separate sections below the table.
(dollars in thousands) | As of March 31, 2007 | As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
Less than one year |
One to three years |
Three to five years |
More than five years |
Total | ||||||||||||||
Non-cancelable leases |
$ | 11,622 | $ | 17,797 | $ | 10,823 | $ | 12,438 | $ | 52,680 | $ | 52,799 | ||||||
Capital leases |
343 | 824 | 906 | 24,149 | 26,222 | 26,308 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 11,965 | $ | 18,621 | $ | 11,729 | $ | 36,587 | $ | 78,902 | $ | 79,107 | ||||||
Leasing of Premises: The Company leases most of its office locations and substantially all of these office leases contain multiple five-year renewal options and provisions for increased rentals, principally for property taxes and maintenance. As of March 31, 2007, the minimum rentals under non-cancelable leases for the next five years
20
and thereafter are shown in the above table. The amounts in the table for minimum rentals are not reported net of the contractual obligations of sub-tenants. Sub-tenants leasing space from the Company are contractually obligated to the Company for approximately $2.2 million. Approximately 63% of these payments are due to the Company over the next three years.
The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect to our financial statements. We have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our financial statements and, therefore we have not included additional disclosure regarding an outstanding commitment to the IRS or various state taxing authorities.
Legal
The Company has been a defendant in a class action lawsuit brought on behalf of persons who entered into a refund anticipation loan application and agreement (the RAL Agreement) with the Company from whose tax refund the Company deducted a debt owed by the applicant to another RAL lender. The lawsuit was filed on March 18, 2003 in the Superior Court in San Francisco, California as Canieva Hood and Congress of California Seniors v. Santa Barbara Bank & Trust, Pacific Capital Bank, N.A., and Jackson-Hewitt, Inc. The Company is a party to a separate cross-collection agreement with each of the other RAL lenders by which it agrees to collect sums due to those other lenders on delinquent RALs by deducting those sums from tax refunds due to its RAL customers and remitting those funds to the RAL lender to whom the debt is owed. This cross-collection procedure is disclosed in the RAL Agreement with the RAL customer and is specifically authorized and agreed to by the customer. The plaintiff does not contest the validity of the debt, but contends that the cross-collection is illegal and requests damages on behalf of the class, injunctive relief against the Company, restitution of sums collected, punitive damages and attorneys fees. Venue for this suit was changed to Santa Barbara. The Company filed an answer to the complaint and a cross complaint for indemnification against the other RAL lenders. On May 4, 2005, a superior court judge in Santa Barbara granted a motion filed by the Company and the other RAL lenders, which resulted in the entry of a judgment in favor of the Company dismissing the suit. The plaintiffs have filed an appeal. A hearing before the Court of Appeal was held on June 14, 2006, and the matter was taken under submission. On September 29, the Court of Appeal, in a 2-1 decision, issued an opinion, which held that the claims in the Complaint that the Company had violated certain California consumer protection laws were not preempted by Federal law and regulations. The Company and the Cross-Defendants have filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the United States Supreme Court seeking to reverse the Court of Appeals opinion. The Company continues to believe that there is no merit to the claims made in this action and intends to vigorously defend itself.
The Company is involved in various lawsuits of a routine nature that are being handled and defended in the ordinary course of the Companys business. Expenses are being incurred in connection with defending the Company, but in the opinion of Management, based in part on consultation with legal counsel, the resolution of these lawsuits will not have a material impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
21
14. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company has not adopted SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements but we are fulfilling the disclosure requirements as per SFAS 157, utilizing SFAS 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments guidance in calculating the fair values. There are several factors that users of these financial statements should keep in mind regarding the fair values disclosed in this note. First, there are uncertainties inherent in the process of estimating the fair value of certain financial instruments. Second, the Company must exclude from its estimate of the fair value of deposit liabilities any consideration of its on-going customer relationships that provide stable sources of investable funds. The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments are disclosed in our 2006 10-K in Note 24, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
The carrying amount and estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are as follows:
(dollars in thousands) | March 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | ||||||||||
Carrying Amount |
Fair Value | Carrying Amount |
Fair Value | |||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 178,821 | $ | 178,821 | $ | 154,182 | $ | 154,182 | ||||
Federal funds sold |
| | | | ||||||||
Securities available-for-sale |
998,147 | 998,061 | 1,167,142 | 1,167,142 | ||||||||
Loans held for sale |
233,939 | 233,939 | | | ||||||||
Net loans |
5,467,738 | 5,396,679 | 5,654,162 | 5,588,402 | ||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights |
1,805 | 1,805 | 1,861 | 1,861 | ||||||||
Total financial assets |
6,880,450 | 6,809,305 | 6,977,347 | 6,911,587 | ||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Deposits |
5,009,284 | 5,001,648 | 5,046,401 | 5,037,103 | ||||||||
Long-term debt and other borrowings |
1,273,472 | 1,269,238 | 1,401,172 | 1,387,966 | ||||||||
Repurchase agreements and |
||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
344,667 | 342,983 | 356,352 | 354,457 | ||||||||
Total financial liabilities |
6,627,423 | 6,613,869 | 6,803,925 | 6,779,526 | ||||||||
Net financial Assets |
$ | 253,027 | $ | 195,436 | $ | 173,422 | $ | 132,061 | ||||
15. SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company has five lines of business for management reporting purposes including Community Banking, Commercial Banking, RAL/RT Programs, Wealth Management, and All Other. Interest income and segment interest expense for segment reporting are presented on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis. The reported financial results for each segment are based on management accounting assumptions, which drive balance sheet and income statement items based on the type of customers, products and services offered. If the Management structure and or allocation process changes, allocations, transfers and assignments may change.
Each segments customers and services from which revenues are derived and the calculation of funds transfer pricing for segment reporting is disclosed within our 2006 10-Ks Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 25, Segment Reporting.
22
Specific Segment Disclosure
The following table presents information for each specific segment regarding assets, profit or loss, and specific items of revenue and expense that are included in that measure of segment profit or loss as reviewed by the Chief Executive Officer. Also included is the sum of the other operating and support units in the All Other column.
(dollars in thousands) |
Community Banking |
Commercial Banking |
RAL/RT Programs |
Wealth Management |
All Other |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
For the Three-months-ended March 31, 2007 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
FTE Interest Income |
$ | 59,943 | $ | 41,595 | $ | 123,985 | $ | | $ | 22,443 | $ | 247,966 | ||||||||||
FTE Interest Expense |
25,637 | | 9,600 | | 26,079 | 61,316 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income |
34,306 | 41,595 | 114,385 | | (3,636 | ) | 186,650 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for Credit Losses |
9,059 | (1,939 | ) | 70,346 | | | 77,466 | |||||||||||||||
Non-Interest Income |
8,146 | 695 | 85,466 | 6,313 | 3,634 | 104,254 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-Interest Expense |
15,380 | 2,204 | 62,002 | 2,693 | 32,615 | 114,894 | ||||||||||||||||
Direct Income before Tax |
18,013 | 42,025 | 67,503 | 3,620 | (32,617 | ) | 98,544 | |||||||||||||||
Indirect Allocations |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Credit (Charge) for funds |
16,981 | (27,546 | ) | (4,595 | ) | 266 | 14,894 | | ||||||||||||||
Net Income before Tax |
$ | 34,994 | $ | 14,479 | $ | 62,908 | $ | 3,886 | $ | (17,723 | ) | $ | 98,544 | |||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,236,833 | $ | 2,078,723 | $ | 135,872 | $ | 10,356 | $ | 1,970,897 | $ | 7,432,681 | ||||||||||
For the Three-months-ended March 31, 2006 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
FTE Interest Income |
$ | 49,948 | $ | 34,794 | $ | 113,526 | $ | | $ | 20,374 | $ | 218,642 | ||||||||||
FTE Interest Expense |
19,635 | | 5,576 | 313 | 16,429 | 41,953 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income |
30,313 | 34,794 | 107,950 | (313 | ) | 3,945 | 176,689 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for Credit Losses |
1,990 | (15 | ) | 46,171 | | | 48,146 | |||||||||||||||
Non-Interest Income |
8,078 | 575 | 89,364 | 4,562 | 1,312 | 103,891 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-Interest Expense |
17,301 | 2,094 | 66,520 | 1,650 | 35,449 | 123,014 | ||||||||||||||||
Direct Income before Tax |
19,100 | 33,290 | 84,623 | 2,599 | (30,192 | ) | 109,420 | |||||||||||||||
Indirect Allocations |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Credit (Charge) for funds |
19,344 | (14,658 | ) | 2,950 | 326 | (7,962 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net Income before Tax |
$ | 38,444 | $ | 18,632 | $ | 87,573 | $ | 2,925 | $ | (38,154 | ) | $ | 109,420 | |||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,693,477 | $ | 1,843,809 | $ | 59,017 | $ | 1,449 | $ | 2,372,384 | $ | 6,970,136 |
23
The following table reconciles total interest income and net income before tax for segments to total interest income and income before provision for income taxes in the Consolidated Financial Statements. For purposes of performance measurement in the segment disclosure above, income from tax-exempt securities, loans, and leases are reported on a fully taxable equivalent basis. Interest income and income before provision for income taxes reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income exclude a tax equivalent adjustment that reflects interest earned on certain municipal securities and loans that are exempt from Federal income tax. While useful to Management, this FTE adjustment to recognize the tax-exempt nature of these instruments is not in accordance with GAAP. Consequently, the table below shows the tax equivalent adjustment as a reconciling item between total interest income and net income before tax for the segments and the corresponding amounts reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
(dollars in thousands) | For the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, |
|||||||
2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Total FTE Interest Income for reportable segments |
$ | 247,966 | $ | 218,642 | ||||
Elimination of taxable equivalent adjustment |
(1,538 | ) | (1,551 | ) | ||||
Reported Total interest income |
$ | 246,428 | $ | 217,091 | ||||
Total Net income before tax for reportable segments |
$ | 98,544 | $ | 109,420 | ||||
Elimination of taxable equivalent adjustment |
(1,538 | ) | (1,551 | ) | ||||
Reported Income before provision for income taxes |
$ | 97,006 | $ | 107,869 | ||||
24
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
BUSINESS
The Company is a bank holding company. All references to the Company, we, our and us apply to Pacific Capital Bancorp and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Companys organizational structure and description of services are discussed in Item 1, Business in our 2006 10-K and in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of our Consolidated Financial Statements in the Form 10-K and they should be read in conjunction with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (10-Q). Terms and acronyms used throughout this document are defined in the glossary on pages 45 through 46.
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW AND HIGHLIGHTS
Effective April 2, 2007, the Board of Directors of Pacific Capital Bancorp named George S. Leis as President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors. Mr. Leis joined Pacific Capital as Executive Vice President in March 2006 and subsequently assumed the role of Chief Information Officer. He began his career in 1983 with the former Security Pacific National Bank and spent several years in a variety of roles within the retail and commercial banking areas. Mr. Leis held Senior Vice President positions in private banking divisions of Bank of America and Wells Fargo. Immediately preceding his arrival at Pacific Capital Bancorp, Mr. Leis was the Managing Director of the U.S. Head Products and National Practice Leader for investments at Deutsche Banks Private Wealth Management Division. Mr. Leis made significant contributions since his arrival at Pacific Capital Bancorp including stabilizing the Information Technology infrastructure and leading the effort to right-size and reorganize both support and revenue producing divisions of Pacific Capital Bancorp.
Mr. Leis replaced William S. Thomas Jr., who retired his role as President and CEO, but continues working with the Company in a community relations capacity.
Financial results in the first quarter of 2007 include a lower than expected financial performance from the RAL and RT Programs. We did experience improved performance in our Core Bank, specifically in non-interest income and lower non-interest expenses. Normalized for the impact of the RAL/RT Programs, Holiday Loans and one-time items recorded in the first quarter of 2007, the operating efficiency ratio improved to 65.32% compared with 69.56% in the first quarter of 2006.
Net income for the three-months ended March 31, 2007 was $58.1 million, or $1.23 per diluted share, compared with net income of $67.4 million, or $1.43 per diluted share for the three-months ended March 31, 2006.
Key drivers are described below and discussed in more detail throughout the Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) and in our Consolidated Financial Statements of this 10-Q:
| Net income from the RAL/RT programs declined by $9.9 million to $39.1 million in the first quarter of 2007 compared with $49.0 million in the first quarter of 2006. The decrease is largely driven by higher loss rates in the RAL pre-file product, higher incidences of fraud in RALs and lower than anticipated RT transaction volumes. |
| Net income from the Core Banking operations increased by $698,000 to $19.0 million in the first quarter of 2007 from $18.3 million in the first quarter of 2006. The increase was driven by a 29.3% increase in non-interest income and a further decline in non-interest expenses, which helped to offset a decline in the net interest margin. |
Net interest income on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis was $186.7 million for the first quarter of 2007 compared with $176.7 million in the first quarter of 2006. Excluding RALs, FTE net interest income was $72.3 million compared with $68.7 million in the first quarter of 2006. The increase is reflective of an 11.1% annualized growth in the loan portfolio compared with the first quarter of 2006.
Net interest income during the first quarter of 2007 from the RAL Program increased to $114.4 million from $108.0 million in the first quarter of 2006. Although the transaction volume decreased by 1.5%, the increase in net interest income was due to higher average RAL balances and fees earned on RAL loans.
Net interest margin for the first quarter of 2007 was 9.36%, which compares with 10.54% in the first quarter of 2006. Exclusive of RALs and Holiday loans in both periods, net interest margin for the first quarter of 2007 was 3.88%, compared with 4.37% in the first quarter of 2006. The decrease in net interest margin is driven by higher funding costs from Wholesale sources and a decline in core deposits.
25
Credit quality remained strong in the first quarter of 2007. Net charge-offs were $74.6 million or 4.38% of average total loans in the first quarter of 2007 compared to $49.1 million or 3.66% of average total loans in first quarter of 2006. Excluding the impact of the RAL Program, net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2007 were $11.9 million or 0.85% of average total loans compared to $8.2 million for the first quarter of 2006 or 0.68% of average total loans. The provision for credit losses was $77.5 million for the first quarter of 2007 compared to $48.1 million recorded in the same period of 2006 due to higher provision for credit losses in the RAL Program. Excluding the impact of the RAL Program and Holiday loans, the provision for credit losses was $5.2 million for the three-month period ending on March 31, 2007, an increase of $4.1 million compared to the three-month period ending March 31, 2006. The increase of $4.1 million in the provision for credit losses in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the first quarter of 2006 was due to an increase in net losses by our Community Lending Group, and the normalization of allowance expense this year compared to 2006 which had benefited from significant reductions in its substandard and SFAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairments of a Loan, pool of loans. The Company announced in April 2007 that Holiday loans and RAL pre-file products would no longer be offered.
Non-interest income increased by $363,000 to $104.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 from $103.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. Excluding the impact of the RAL/RT Programs, non-interest income increased by 29.3% or $4.3 million in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the first quarter of 2006. This increase is driven by the increases in nearly all categories with particularly strong growth in trust and investment advisory fees of 38.4% or $1.7 million and an increase of $1.8 million in the gain on sale of securities compared to the first quarter of 2006. The increase of trust and investment advisory fees is mostly attributed to the acquisition of Morton Capital Management (MCM), which has enabled the Company to increase its product offering to high net-worth customers. The increase in gain on the sale of securities is primarily from the $1.6 million gain realized on the sale of the 2003 and 2004 leveraging portfolios in the first quarter of 2007. This gain partially offsets the $8.8 million impairment loss recorded in the fourth quarter of 2006 as discussed in our 2006 10-K and in Note 4, Securities of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this 10-Q.
The table below highlights the changes in non-interest income and the contribution from the RAL/RT programs.
(dollars in thousands) | For the Three-Month Periods Ended | |||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2007 | March 31, 2006 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Excluding RAL/RT |
RAL/RT | Consolidated | Excluding RAL/RT |
RAL/RT | |||||||||||||
Non-interest income: |
||||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposits |
$ | 4,257 | $ | 4,257 | $ | | $ | 3,998 | $ | 3,998 | $ | | ||||||
Trust and investment advisory fees |
6,230 | 6,230 | | 4,500 | 4,500 | | ||||||||||||
Refund transfer fees |
39,218 | | 39,218 | 39,454 | | 39,454 | ||||||||||||
Other service charges, commissions and fees, net |
8,424 | 4,002 | 4,422 | 10,457 | 3,710 | 6,747 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of tax refund loans (RALs), net |
41,822 | | 41,822 | 43,163 | | 43,163 | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on securities, net |
1,941 | 1,941 | | 147 | 147 | | ||||||||||||
Other income |
2,362 | 2,358 | 4 | 2,172 | 2,172 | | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest income |
$ | 104,254 | $ | 18,788 | $ | 85,466 | $ | 103,891 | $ | 14,527 | $ | 89,364 | ||||||
Non-interest expense was $114.9 for the first quarter of 2007, a decrease of 6.6% or $8.1 million from $123.0 million in the first quarter of 2006. Excluding the impact of the RAL/RT Programs, non-interest expense was $52.9 million for the first quarter of 2007, a $3.6 million or 6.4% decrease from the first quarter of 2006 when the expense was $56.5 million. This improvement is due to our continued focus on expense management. The primary drivers include decreases in personnel expense from staff reductions, lower software amortization and an overall reduction in other non-interest expenses including consulting, marketing and discretionary expenses. The decrease in expenses from the RAL/RT Programs is due to lower marketing and technology fees incurred in the first quarter of 2007 as a result of lower transaction volumes.
26
The table below highlights the changes in non-interest expenses and the RAL/RT Programs impact.
(dollars in thousands) | For the Three-Month Periods Ended | |||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2007 | March 31, 2006 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Excluding RAL/RT |
RAL/RT | Consolidated | Excluding RAL/RT |
RAL/RT | |||||||||||||
Non-interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||||
Personnel |
$ | 35,800 | $ | 29,204 | $ | 6,596 | $ | 34,614 | $ | 29,845 | $ | 4,769 | ||||||
Occupancy expense |
5,309 | 5,053 | 256 | 4,815 | 4,588 | 227 | ||||||||||||
Equipment expense |
2,466 | 2,247 | 219 | 2,412 | 2,201 | 211 | ||||||||||||
Refund program marketing and technology fees |
44,487 | | 44,487 | 52,043 | | 52,043 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses |
26,832 | 16,388 | 10,444 | 29,130 | 19,860 | 9,270 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
$ | 114,894 | $ | 52,892 | $ | 62,002 | $ | 123,014 | $ | 56,494 | $ | 66,520 | ||||||
The Companys operating efficiency ratio for the first quarter of 2007 was 39.76%, compared with 43.87% in the same period last year. Excluding the impact of the RAL/RT programs, Holiday loans and the one-time items recorded in particular quarters, the Companys operating efficiency ratio for the first quarter of 2007 was 65.32%, compared with 69.56% in the same period last year. This also compares with an operating efficiency ratio of 66.16% in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Operating Efficiency Ratio:
(dollars in thousands) | For the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | RAL/RT Impact |
Excluding RAL/RT |
1st Quarter Items impact |
Excluding 1st Quarter items, RAL/RT |
Holiday Loans Impact |
Excluding RAL/RT, 1st Qtr and Holiday loan impact |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Interest Expense |
$ | 114,894 | $ | (62,002 | ) | $ | 52,892 | $ | 728 | $ | 53,620 | $ | | $ | 53,620 | ||||||||||||
Net Interest Income |
185,112 | (118,069 | ) | 67,043 | | 67,043 | (3,346 | ) | 63,697 | ||||||||||||||||||
Add: Non-Interest Income |
104,254 | (85,466 | ) | 18,788 | | 18,788 | | 18,788 | |||||||||||||||||||
Less: Gain/Loss on Securities |
1,941 | | 1,941 | | 1,941 | | 1,941 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Add: Tax Equivalent Adj. on Securities |
1,538 | | 1,538 | | 1,538 | | 1,538 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Income for Efficiency Ratio |
$ | 288,963 | $ | 85,428 | $ | 85,428 | $ | 82,082 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating Efficiency Ratio |
39.76 | % | 61.91 | % | 62.77 | % | 65.32 | % |
27
(dollars in thousands) | For the Three-Month Period Ended December 31, 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | RAL/RT Impact |
Excluding RAL/RT |
4th Quarter Items impact |
Excluding 4th Quarter items, RAL/RT |
Holiday Loans Impact |
Excluding RAL/RT, 4th Qtr and Holiday loan impact |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Interest Expense |
$ | 66,536 | $ | (3,363 | ) | $ | 63,173 | $ | (9,922 | ) | $ | 53,251 | $ | | $ | 53,251 | ||||||||||||
Net Interest Income |
66,572 | 622 | 67,194 | | 67,194 | (4,728 | ) | 62,466 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Add: Non-Interest Income |
9,887 | (235 | ) | 9,652 | (1,962 | ) | 7,690 | | 7,690 | |||||||||||||||||||
Less: Gain/Loss on Securities |
(8,761 | ) | | (8,761 | ) | N/A | (8,761 | ) | | (8,761 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Add: Tax Equivalent Adj. on Securities |
1,567 | | 1,567 | | 1,567 | | 1,567 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Income for Efficiency Ratio |
$ | 86,787 | $ | 87,174 | $ | 85,212 | $ | 80,484 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Efficiency Ratio |
76.67 | % | 72.47 | % | 62.49 | % | 66.16 | % |
(dollars in thousands) | For the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | RAL/RT Impact |
Excluding RAL/RT |
1st Quarter Items impact |
Excluding 1st Quarter items, RAL/RT |
Holiday Loans Impact |
Excluding RAL/RT, 1st Qtr and Holiday loan impact |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Interest Expense |
$ | 123,014 | $ | (66,520 | ) | $ | 56,494 | $ | | $ | 56,494 | $ | | $ | 56,494 | ||||||||||||
Net Interest Income |
175,138 | (107,950 | ) | 67,188 | | 67,188 | (1,904 | ) | 65,284 | ||||||||||||||||||
Add: Non-Interest Income |
103,891 | (89,364 | ) | 14,527 | | 14,527 | | 14,527 | |||||||||||||||||||
Less: Gain/Loss on Securities |
147 | | 147 | | 147 | | 147 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Add: Tax Equivalent Adj. on Securities |
1,551 | | 1,551 | | 1,551 | | 1,551 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Income for Efficiency Ratio |
$ | 280,433 | $ | 83,119 | $ | 83,119 | $ | 81,215 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating Efficiency Ratio |
43.87 | % | 67.97 | % | 67.97 | % | 69.56 | % |
The improvement in the core banks operating efficiency ratio from the fourth quarter of 2006 is primarily attributable to higher revenue and the continued impact of the Companys expense management initiatives.
Segments
We operate under five lines of business for management reporting including Community Banking, Commercial Banking, RAL/RT Programs, Wealth Management and All Other. A description of the segments, financial results and allocation methodology is discussed in our Consolidated Financial Statements within our 2006 10-K, Note 25, Segment Reporting and in our 10-Q, Note 15, Segment Reporting in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
28
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Companys accounting policies for significant balance sheet and income statement accounts are disclosed in our 2006 10-K, Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and in the Critical Accounting Polices section of the MD&A. Management believes that a number of these polices are critical to the understanding of the Companys financial condition and results of operation because they involve estimates, judgment, or are otherwise less subject to precise measurement and because the quality of the estimates materially impact those results. This section is intended (1) to identify those critical accounting policies used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements; (2) to help the reader understand the methodology used in determining these estimates; (3) to identify assumptions used in determining these estimates; and (4) to give readers an understanding of the impact those estimates have on the presentation of the Companys financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations.
The preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with GAAP requires Management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of reported assets and liabilities as well as contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of these financial statements. Some of these critical estimates concern past events that are uncertain or otherwise not subject to direct measurement. Others involve predictions regarding future events. As events occur and these estimates and assumptions are confirmed or are shown to require adjustment, they affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s). Although Management believes these estimates and assumptions to be reasonably accurate, actual results may differ.
The principal areas in which significant estimates and management judgment are used are as follows:
| Allowance for credit losses |
| Accounting for income taxes |
| Accounting for securities |
| Goodwill and other intangible assets |
| Revenue recognition on loans |
| RAL/RT Programs |
These principal areas are discussed in detail in our 2006 10-K in the Critical Accounting Polices section of the MD&A and in our Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies which are essential to understanding our financial information within this 10-Q.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
NET INTEREST INCOME AND NET INTEREST MARGIN
The Companys primary source of revenue is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest earned on the loans and securities portfolios and the interest paid on deposits and wholesale borrowings. The net interest income and the net interest margin are reported on a FTE basis. A tax equivalent adjustment is added to reflect interest earned on certain municipal securities and loans that are exempt from Federal income tax.
FTE net interest income increased by $10.0 million or 5.6% to $186.7 million for the first quarter of 2007 compared to $176.7 million in the first quarter of 2006. The primary driver of the increase was the growth in the average balance of the loan portfolio, increasing by $1.48 billion or 27.2% including RAL and $768.7 million or 15.7% excluding RAL. FTE interest income excluding RALs was $72.3 million in the first quarter of 2007 compared to $68.7 million in the first quarter of 2006. The weighted average rate on loans excluding RAL increased to 7.77% for the first quarter of 2007 compared to 7.40% for the first quarter of 2006.
Interest expense in the first quarter of 2007 was $61.3 million, an increase of $19.4 million or 46.2% over the first quarter of 2006 of $42.0 million. The increase in interest expense in the first three months of 2007 compared to the first three months of 2006 is mostly attributed to higher interest rates being paid on deposits and a reliance on more expensive wholesale borrowings such as FHLB advances to fund loan growth. This increase in interest expense is evident in the Volume and Rate Variance Analysis of Net Interest Income table on page 32. The weighted average rate on deposits increased by 95 basis points (bps) for the three-month period ending March 31, 2007 compared to the three-month period ending March 31, 2006 while the average balance on other borrowings increased $427.5 million in the first quarter of 2007 versus the first quarter of 2006.
29
The FTE net interest margin in the first quarter of 2007 decreased to 9.36% compared to 10.54% for the first quarter of 2006. This decrease is mainly attributable to higher funding costs and lower than anticipated RAL loans and a higher ending RAL loan balance as of March 31, 2007. Excluding RALs and Holiday loans FTE net interest margin increased 5 bps in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the fourth quarter of 2006. We are encouraged by this improvement and expect our net interest margin to expand in future quarters due to our business alignment strategies and our continued focus to improve our balance sheet management.
The table below depicts the FTE net interest margin excluding RALs and Holiday loans.
FTE Net Interest Margin Exclusive of RAL and Holiday Loans:
(dollars in thousands) | For the Three-Month Periods Ended | |||||||||||
March 31, 2007 |
December 31, 2006 |
March 31, 2006 |
||||||||||
Consolidated Average Earning Assets |
$ | 8,086,319 | $ | 6,663,096 | $ | 6,799,230 | ||||||
RALAverage Earning Assets |
1,230,384 | 1,559 | 577,424 | |||||||||
Holiday LoanAverage Loans |
41,554 | 35,797 | 22,955 | |||||||||
Adjusted Consolidated Average Earning Assets |
$ | 6,814,381 | $ | 6,625,740 | $ | 6,198,851 | ||||||
Tax Equivalent Consolidated Net Interest Income |
$ | 186,650 | $ | 68,139 | $ | 176,689 | ||||||
Net Interest Income Adjustment for RAL |
(114,385 | ) | 622 | (107,950 | ) | |||||||
Internal Funds Transfer charge for RAL Deposit Float |
(3,684 | ) | | | ||||||||
Adjusted Tax Equivalent Consolidated Net Interest Income (Net of RAL) |
68,581 | 68,761 | 68,739 | |||||||||
Net Interest Income Adjustment for Holiday Loans (HL) |
(3,346 | ) | (4,728 | ) | (1,904 | ) | ||||||
Adjusted Tax Equivalent Consolidated Net Interest Income (Net of RAL & HL) |
$ | 65,235 | $ | 64,033 | $ | 66,835 | ||||||
Excluding RAL |
4.06 | % | 4.10 | % | 4.48 | % | ||||||
Excluding RAL and Holiday Loans |
3.88 | % | 3.83 | % | 4.37 | % |
The tables immediately following this discussion are useful in understanding the changes in balances and yields of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. A short description of the tables is as follows:
Distribution of Average Assets, Liabilities, and Shareholders Equity and Related Interest Income, Expense and Rates, sets forth the average daily balances for the major asset and liability categories, the related income or expense where applicable, and the resultant yield or cost attributable to the average earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in the average balances and the rates received or paid depend on market opportunities, how well the Company has managed interest rate risks, product pricing policy, product mix, and external trends and developments.
Volume and Rate Variance Analysis of Net Interest Income, analyzes the changes in net interest income from the current quarter of 2007 to the same quarter in 2006. The analysis shows the impact of volume and rate changes on the major categories of assets and liabilities from one year to the next. The table explains what portion of the difference or variance in interest income or expense from one year to the next for each major category of assets or liabilities is due to changes in the balances (volume) or to changes in rates.
30
Distribution of Average Assets, Liabilities, and Shareholders Equity and Related Interest Income, Expense, and Rates Fully Tax Equivalent Basis
For the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2007 |
For the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2006 |
||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Balance | Income | Rate | Balance | Income | Rate | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
$ | 59,243 | $ | 804 | 5.50 | % | $ | 11,314 | $ | 126 | 4.52 | % | |||||||
Securities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
912,814 | 10,209 | 4.54 | % | 1,147,434 | 11,835 | 4.18 | % | |||||||||||
Non-taxable |
207,970 | 4,225 | 8.13 | % | 209,608 | 4,237 | 8.09 | % | |||||||||||
Total securities |
1,120,784 | 14,434 | 5.21 | % | 1,357,042 | 16,072 | 4.78 | % | |||||||||||
Loans: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Commercial (including leasing) |
1,333,226 | 29,528 | 8.98 | % | 1,220,424 | 25,189 | 8.37 | % | |||||||||||
Real estate-multi family & nonresidential |
2,065,549 | 38,457 | 7.45 | % | 1,808,220 | 32,866 | 7.27 | % | |||||||||||
Real estate-residential 1-4 family |
1,414,174 | 20,695 | 5.85 | % | 1,147,242 | 16,271 | 5.67 | % | |||||||||||
Consumer (1) |
2,090,381 | 143,995 | 27.94 | % | 1,251,588 | 128,100 | 41.51 | % | |||||||||||
Other |
2,962 | 53 | 7.26 | % | 3,400 | 18 | 2.15 | % | |||||||||||
Total loans (2) (3) |
6,906,292 | 232,728 | 13.62 | % | 5,430,874 | 202,444 | 15.07 | % | |||||||||||
Total earning assets |
8,086,319 | 247,966 | 12.44 | % | 6,799,230 | 218,642 | 13.04 | % | |||||||||||
SFAS 115 Market Value Adjustment |
22,083 | 1,608 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-earning assets |
78,233 | 435,603 | |||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 8,186,635 | $ | 7,236,441 | |||||||||||||||
Liabilities and shareholders equity: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts |
$ | 2,072,980 | $ | 12,548 | 2.45 | % | $ | 2,293,446 | $ | 10,001 | 1.77 | % | |||||||
Time certificates of deposit |
2,016,157 | 22,874 | 4.60 | % | 1,748,645 | 15,527 | 3.60 | % | |||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
4,089,137 | 35,422 | 3.51 | % | 4,042,091 | 25,528 | 2.56 | % | |||||||||||
Borrowed funds: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Repos and Federal funds purchased |
525,802 | 6,844 | 5.28 | % | 470,775 | 5,165 | 4.45 | % | |||||||||||
Other borrowings |
1,453,147 | 19,050 | 5.32 | % | 1,025,610 | 11,260 | 4.45 | % | |||||||||||
Total borrowed funds |
1,978,949 | 25,894 | 5.31 | % | 1,496,385 | 16,425 | 4.45 | % | |||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
6,068,086 | 61,316 | 4.10 | % | 5,538,476 | 41,953 | 3.07 | % | |||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
1,393,120 | 1,398,904 | |||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
90,010 | (263,763 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
635,419 | 562,824 | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 8,186,635 | $ | 7,236,441 | |||||||||||||||
Interest income/earning assets |
12.44 | % | 13.04 | % | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense/earning assets |
3.08 | % | 2.50 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent net interest income/margin |
186,650 | 9.36 | % | 176,689 | 10.54 | % | |||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses charged to operations/earning assets |
77,466 | 3.88 | % | 48,146 | 2.87 | % | |||||||||||||
Net interest margin after provision for credit losses on tax equivalent basis |
109,184 | 5.48 | % | 128,543 | 7.67 | % | |||||||||||||
Less: tax equivalent income included in interest income from non-taxable securities and loans |
1,538 | 0.08 | % | 1,551 | 0.10 | % | |||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for credit loss |
$ | 107,646 | 5.40 | % | $ | 126,992 | 7.57 | % | |||||||||||
Loan information excluding RALs: |
|||||||||||||||||||
(1) Consumer loans other than RALs |
$ | 858,330 | $ | 20,010 | 9.45 | % | $ | 726,214 | $ | 15,157 | 8.46 | % | |||||||
(2) Loans other than RALs |
$ | 5,674,241 | $ | 108,743 | 7.77 | % | $ | 4,905,500 | $ | 89,501 | 7.40 | % | |||||||
(3) Nonaccrual loans are included in loan balances. Interest income includes related fee income. |
|
31
Volume and Rate Variance Analysis of Net Interest IncomeTaxable equivalent basis
(dollars in thousands) | For the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2007 vs. March 31, 2006 |
|||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in: | Change in Average Balance |
Change in Income/ Expense |
Rate | Volume | ||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Money market instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
$ | 47,929 | $ | 678 | $ | 33 | $ | 645 | ||||||||
Securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
(234,620 | ) | (1,626 | ) | 952 | (2,578 | ) | |||||||||
Non-taxable |
(1,638 | ) | (12 | ) | 21 | (33 | ) | |||||||||
Total securities |
(236,258 | ) | (1,638 | ) | 973 | (2,611 | ) | |||||||||
Loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial (including leasing) |
112,802 | 4,339 | 1,913 | 2,426 | ||||||||||||
Real estate-multi family & nonresidential |
257,329 | 5,591 | 829 | 4,762 | ||||||||||||
Real estate-residential 1-4 family |
266,932 | 4,424 | 531 | 3,893 | ||||||||||||
Consumer loans |
838,793 | 15,895 | (51,084 | ) | 66,979 | |||||||||||
Other loans |
(438 | ) | 35 | 37 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Total loans |
1,475,418 | 30,284 | (47,774 | ) | 78,058 | |||||||||||
Total earning assets |
$ | 1,287,089 | $ | 29,324 | $ | (46,768 | ) | $ | 76,092 | |||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: |
||||||||||||||||
Savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts |
$ | (220,466 | ) | $ | 2,547 | $ | 3,576 | $ | (1,029 | ) | ||||||
Time certificates of deposit |
267,512 | 7,347 | 4,738 | 2,609 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
47,046 | 9,894 | 8,314 | 1,580 | ||||||||||||
Borrowed funds: |
||||||||||||||||
Repos and Federal funds purchased |
55,027 | 1,679 | 1,032 | 647 | ||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
427,537 | 7,790 | 2,487 | 5,303 | ||||||||||||
Total borrowed funds |
482,564 | 9,469 | 3,519 | 5,950 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
$ | 529,610 | 19,363 | 11,833 | 7,530 | |||||||||||
Tax equivalent net interest income |
$ | 9,961 | $ | (58,601 | ) | $ | 68,562 | |||||||||
Loans excluding RALs |
$ | 768,741 | $ | 19,242 | $ | 4,654 | $ | 14,588 | ||||||||
Consumer loans excluding RALs |
$ | 132,116 | $ | 4,853 | $ | 1,900 | $ | 2,953 |
(1) | Income and yield calculations are presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis. |
(2) | The change not solely due to volume or rate has been prorated into rate and volume components. |
The proration is done based on the relative amounts of the rate and volume variances prior to the proration.
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES
Quarterly, the Company estimates its allowance for credit losses and calculates the change in the allowance for credit losses from the prior quarter. This net change in the allowance coupled with the net write-offs experienced during the period determines the provision for credit losses. For additional information regarding the calculation of the allowance for credit losses, refer to the allowance for credit losses discussion within the 2006 10-K MD&A.
Provision for credit losses increased by $29.3 million in the first quarter of 2007 when compared to the first quarter of 2006. The increase is largely driven by the RAL program and Holiday loans. The RAL provision for credit
32
losses was $70.3 million in the first quarter of 2007 compared with $46.2 million in the first quarter of 2006, an increase of $24.2 million. The increase is largely driven by higher loss rates in the RAL pre-file product and higher incidences of fraud in all RAL business lines. The remainder of the increase in the provision for credit losses is mostly attributed to the Holiday loan program. Due to the higher loss rates on the RAL pre-file product and Holiday loans, the Company has decided to no longer offer these products.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Non-interest income includes fee income received from servicing deposit relationships, trust and investment advisory fees, RT fees earned from processing tax refunds, fees and commissions earned on certain transactions and gains or losses on the sale of securities and assets. Non-interest income totaled $104.3 million for the three-months ended March 31, 2007, an increase of $363,000 over the same period in 2006. The following is a brief discussion of the material components of non-interest income.
Trust and Investment Advisory Fees
Trust and investment advisory fees earned by the Wealth Management segment represents a significant component of non-interest income. Fees earned in the first three months of 2007 totaled $6.2 million, an increase of $1.7 million or 38.4%. The key driver of the increase was investment advisory fees earned from MCM. In July 2006, the Bank purchased MCM and enabled the Company to expand its product offering to existing customers and the ability to service new customers. The Wealth Management segment offers a variety of services including individual, fiduciary and foundation asset management, a complete trust service offering, and private banking and cash management deposit services.
Gain on Sale of Tax Refund Loans (RALs)
The gain on the sale of Tax Refund loans (RALs) in the first quarter of 2007 totaled $41.8 million, a decrease of $1.3 million or 3.1% over the same period of 2006. Higher fees paid to investors and higher commitment fees drove this decrease.
Gain on sale of Tax Refund Loans (RALs):
For the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, |
||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
RAL fees |
$ | 59, 969 | $ | 60,867 | ||||
Fees paid to investor |
(2,383 | ) | (1,796 | ) | ||||
Commitment fees paid |
(1,575 | ) | (1,155 | ) | ||||
Credit losses |
(14,189 | ) | (14,753 | ) | ||||
Net gain on sale of RALs |
$ | 41,822 | $ | 43,163 | ||||
Cash flows associated with the RALs sold to securitization partners are reported net as a gain on sale of loans. This gain is reported in a separate non-interest income line item of the Consolidated Statements of Income and is further explained in Note 8, Refund Anticipation Loan and Refund Transfer Programs within the 10-Q, Consolidated Financial Statements.
Gain (Loss) on Sales and Calls of Securities
We sold all the securities in our 2003 and 2004 leveraging strategy portfolios in the first quarter of 2007 and recognized a gain of $1.6 million due to a more favorable interest rate environment at the time of the sale compared to December 31, 2006 when the securities were marked to market. This gain partially offset the $8.8 million loss we recorded at December 31, 2006. We also recognized a gain of $335,000 from called securities in the first quarter of 2007.
33
Other service charges, commissions and fees
Other service charges, commissions and fees totaled $8.4 million for the three-months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $10.5 million for the same period of 2006.
The decrease in other service charges, commissions and fees is driven by the $2.4 million decrease of collection fees in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the same quarter in 2006. Collection fees are fees paid by returning RAL customers and cross-collections from third party vendors that collect on previous years charged-off RALs. The main driver of the decrease in collection fees is due to fewer third-party vendors participating in cross-collections of RALs.
Below is a table that summarizes the significant components that caused the $2.0 million decrease.
For the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, | ||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2007 | 2006 | ||||
Included in other service charges, commissions and fees: |
||||||
Collection fees |
$ | 3,744 | $ | 6,112 | ||
Debit card fees |
832 | 738 | ||||
RAL ATM fees |
691 | 642 | ||||
Standby letter of credit fees |
431 | 199 |
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES
The Companys non-interest expenses decreased by $8.1 million to $114.9 million for the first quarter of 2007 compared to the first quarter of 2006. Key drivers of non-interest expenses are discussed below.
Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits were $35.8 million for the three-months ended March 31, 2007 versus $34.6 million for the same period in 2006. The increase is due to higher average salaries, overtime, temporary contract labor and bonus commitments to support the RAL/RT Programs. These expense increases were partially offset by a reduction in salaries and benefits in our core banking operations due to organizational right-sizing and staff eliminations.
Net Occupancy Expense
Net occupancy expense increased $494,000 in the first quarter of 2007 compared to the first quarter of 2006. This increase relates to newly opened wealth management offices and the Paso Robles branch, as well as consumer price index increases and improvements to our existing offices.
Refund program marketing and technology fees
The decrease of $7.6 million in refund program marketing and technology fees is attributable to lower RAL/RT volumes processed through the JHTS channel. The Company pays these fees in accordance with the 2006 contract change with JHTS as described in our 2006 10-K.
Other Expense
Other expense was $26.8 million for the three-months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $29.1 million for the same period in 2006, a decrease of $2.3 million. The decrease is due to an overall reduction in discretionary spending from initiatives we have implemented to reduce non-interest expenses such as business travel, employee related expenses and the elimination of consultants augmenting our IT staff. We also realized a $960,000 reduction in software amortization resulting from the write-off of obsolete software in the fourth quarter of 2006 and fully amortized software in the first quarter of 2007. The write-off of obsolete software is discussed in our 2006 10-K.
34
BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
SECURITIES
Securities decreased by $169.0 million since December 31, 2006. The decrease occurred due to the Companys decision to sell all the securities purchased in connection with the 2003 and 2004 leveraging strategies in the fourth quarter of 2006. The value of the securities sold in the first quarter of 2007 was $326.5 million. The decision to sell these securities required that we recognize the unrealized loss of $8.8 million in the income statement as a net loss on securities at December 31, 2006. We sold these securities during the first quarter of 2007 and recognized an off-setting gain of $1.6 million to result in a net loss on the sale of the 2003 and 2004 leveraging strategy of $7.2 million.
The majority of the proceeds from the sale of these securities were reinvested in higher yielding security instruments with a book value of $205.6 million. The purchase of these securities was necessary to maintain our collateral requirements. The remainder of the proceeds was used to pay down wholesale borrowings.
LOANS HELD FOR SALE
In the first quarter of 2007, we began a process of analyzing all business lines to assess their long range fit with our strategic plan. As a result of this analysis, we determined in March 2007 that we would exit the indirect auto loan origination business. As of March 31, 2007 these loans were classified as held for sale consistent with our intent to sell the existing portfolio and cease loan origination. Additional details associated with the indirect auto portfolio classified as Loans held for sale are in Note 5, Loans held for sale of our Consolidated Financial Statements of this 10-Q. We expect to sell the indirect auto loan portfolio by the end of the second quarter of 2007 and do not anticipate a material gain or loss on the sale of this portfolio.
LOAN PORTFOLIO
The Company offers a wide variety of loan types and terms to individuals and small to medium size businesses along with very competitive pricing and quick delivery of the credit decision. The following paragraphs highlight the changes in our loan portfolio since December 31, 2006.
The loan portfolio decreased by $187.9 million since December 31, 2006 largely due to the impact of Holiday loans on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 and the reclassification of indirect auto loans to Loans held for sale, partially offset by our core bank loan growth and higher RAL loans on the balance sheet as of March 31, 2007 compared to March 31, 2006. A discussion of major drivers follows.
In the fourth quarter of each year, the Company originates Holiday loans which are either repaid or charged-off by the first quarter of each year. As of December 31, 2006, we had $86.3 million of Holiday loans. Holiday loans are another product offered by professional tax preparers to their clients. Holiday loans are subject to the same underwriting criteria and credit review as a RAL. Holiday loans are unsecured loans, but typically pay-off with a RAL or RT product. Due to their unsecured nature, Holiday loans have a higher default rate than other loan categories. In a recent press release, we announced that we would no longer offer the Holiday loan product since we experienced higher than expected losses.
As of March 31, 2007 we reclassified $233.9 million of the qualifying indirect auto loan portfolio, net of the associated allowance for credit loss, deferred fees and expenses to Loans held for sale. The details of this reclassification are described in Note 5, Loans held for sale of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Company experienced positive loan growth of $88.1 million in loans secured by residential and commercial (nonresidential) real estate and in construction loans since December 31, 2006. The growth in these types of loans are indicative of the strong demand for housing and strong economic environment in the Companys market areas.
As of March 31, 2007, we had $108.6 million of RAL loans remaining on our balance sheet that we expect to be paid off by future IRS refund processing throughout the remainder of 2007. This balance is higher than in prior years due to increased fraud screening by the IRS. RALs are short-term consumer loans offered to taxpayers, secured by their anticipated tax refund and subject to an underwriting process prior to approval. RALs are repaid directly by the IRS to the Company once the tax return has been processed. Funds received from the IRS above the RAL less associated fees are remitted to the taxpayer by the Company. Due to their short duration, the Company
35
cannot recover the processing costs through interest calculated over the term of the loan. Consequently, the Company has a tiered fee schedule for this service. The larger the loan, the larger the credit risk from nonpayment. The fees vary by the amount of the loan to compensate for the increased credit risk rather than the duration that the loan is outstanding. The RAL fees are accounted for as interest income since this is a credit product. RALs are offered during the tax-filing season of January through April of each year. Any loan balance for which repayment has not been received by the end of the year is charged off. Therefore, no RALs were reported as of December 31, 2006.
ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
Credit risk is inherent in the business of extending loans and leases to borrowers. The Company sets aside an allowance or reserve for credit losses through charges to earnings. These charges are shown in the Consolidated Statements of Income as provision for credit losses. All specifically identifiable and quantifiable losses are charged off against the allowance when realized. However, for a variety of reasons, not all losses that have occurred are immediately made known to the Company and of those that are known the full extent of the loss may not be specifically quantifiable. The allowance for credit losses is an estimate of those losses. A summary of the activity for our provision of credit losses, charge-offs and recoveries for the first three months of 2007 and 2006 is included in Note 7, Allowance for Credit Losses of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
CREDIT LOSSES
The table below shows the current annualized ratio of charge-offs to average loans for the last four years. This ratio is disproportionately high in the first and second quarters of each year due to the large amount of RALs that are charged-off in the first and second quarters of each year. The first quarter is also impacted by the seasonal charge-off of Holiday loans. Holiday loans have a higher default rate than other loan categories. In the first quarter of 2007, net losses for Holiday loans totaled $6.0 million compared to $3.6 million in the first quarter of 2006.
The table below depicts the historical trend of charge-offs on a consolidated basis and without the impact of the RAL/RT Programs.
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans:
2007 YTD Annualized |
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding, Consolidated |
4.38 | % | 1.05 | % | 1.22 | % | 0.36 | % | 0.72 | % | |||||
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding, excluding RALs |
0.85 | % | 0.37 | % | 0.36 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.46 | % | |||||
Peer ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding |
n/a | 0.29 | % | 0.34 | % | 0.49 | % | 0.70 | % |
Exclusive of RALs, the ratio of net charge-offs to average loans over the last four years has varied from 0.14% to 0.46%. In the first quarter of 2007 the indirect auto portfolio was transferred to Loans held for sale thus reducing the average loan balance used as the denominator of the calculation. The increase to 85 bps for the ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding, excluding RALs in the first quarter of 2007 is partially due to this reclassification and also from higher Holiday loan charge-offs discussed above. This reclassification included the applicable reserve for loans losses. Management regards this range to be within normal expectations given the changing economic conditions over these periods and anticipates that we will be within this range by the end of the year. The table above shows the trend over the last four years and 2007 annualized for the first quarter results.
Annualized consolidated net charge-offs in the first quarter of 2007 were higher than in prior years largely driven by higher RAL charge-offs compared to prior periods due to higher losses on the RAL pre-file loans, certain
36
instances of fraud and higher past due RAL loan balances. The increase in the charge-off ratio in 2005 is due to a change in the terms of one of the contracts with Jackson Hewitt Technology Services (JHTS) in 2005 as described in our 2006 10-K.
The Company takes several steps to minimize losses from RAL loans. Preparers are screened before they are allowed to submit their electronic filings; procedures for the preparers to follow have been defined to ensure that the agreement signed by the taxpayer is a valid loan; and the preparers IRS reject rates are monitored very carefully. In accordance with the RAL loan application signed by the taxpayer, if the taxpayer applies for a loan the following year, the unpaid proceeds from the prior year are deducted from the current years loan proceeds. In addition, the Company has entered into cooperative collection agreements with other banks offering RAL products. Under those agreements, if a taxpayer owing money to one bank from a prior year applies for a loan from another bank, the second bank repays the delinquent amount to the first bank before remitting the refund to the taxpayer.
37
NONACCRUAL, PAST DUE, AND RESTRUCTURED LOANS
The table below summarizes the Companys nonperforming assets and credit quality ratios for the current quarter, the same quarter a year ago and the quarter ending December 31, 2006.
(dollars in thousands) | March 31, 2007 |
December 31, 2006 |
March 31, 2006 |
|||||||||
Nonaccrual loans |
$ | 19,246 | $ | 17,049 | $ | 14,542 | ||||||
90 days or more past due |
266 | 264 | 390 | |||||||||
Total nonperforming loans |
19,512 | 17,313 | 14,932 | |||||||||
Foreclosed collateral |
2,967 | 2,910 | 2,910 | |||||||||
Total nonperforming assets |
$ | 22,479 | $ | 20,223 | $ | 17,842 | ||||||
Allowance for credit losses, excluding RALs |
$ | 55,596 | $ | 64,669 | $ | 49,356 | ||||||
Allowance for credit losses, RALs |
7,608 | 2 | 5,320 | |||||||||
Total allowance for credit losses, Consolidated |
$ | 63,204 | $ | 64,671 | $ | 54,676 | ||||||
COMPANY RATIOSConsolidated: |
||||||||||||
Coverage ratio of allowance for credit losses to total loans |
1.14 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.10 | % | ||||||
Coverage ratio of allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans |
324 | % | 374 | % | 366 | % | ||||||
Ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans |
0.35 | % | 0.30 | % | 0.30 | % | ||||||
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets |
0.30 | % | 0.27 | % | 0.26 | % | ||||||
Ratio of allowance for credit losses to potential problem loans and nonperforming loans |
33.48 | % | 69.50 | % | 53.15 | % | ||||||
COMPANY RATIOSExcluding RAL: |
||||||||||||
Coverage ratio of allowance for credit losses to total loans |
1.03 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.00 | % | ||||||
Coverage ratio of allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans |
285 | % | 374 | % | 331 | % | ||||||
Ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans |
0.36 | % | 0.30 | % | 0.30 | % | ||||||
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets |
0.32 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.26 | % | ||||||
Ratio of allowance for credit losses to potential problem loans and nonperforming loans |
69.38 | % | 69.50 | % | 47.98 | % | ||||||
FDIC PEER GROUP RATIOS: |
||||||||||||
Coverage ratio of allowance for credit losses to total loans |
n/a | 1.27 | % | 1.29 | % | |||||||
Coverage ratio of allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans |
n/a | 188 | % | 227 | % | |||||||
Ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans |
n/a | 0.68 | % | 0.57 | % | |||||||
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets |
n/a | 0.51 | % | 0.43 | % |
Nonaccrual Loans: If there is reasonable doubt as to the collectibility of principal or interest on a loan, the loan is placed in nonaccrual status, i.e., the Company stops accruing income from the interest on the loan and reverses any uncollected interest that had been accrued. These loans may or may not be collateralized. Collection efforts are pursued on all nonaccrual loans. Consumer loans are an exception to this reclassification. They are charged-off at certain delinquency benchmarks determined by product and collateral. In any event, consumer loans are charged-off no later than 120 days past due with the exception of real estate secured loans, which are charged-off when a specific analysis can quantify the loss amount. Collection efforts continue even after charge-off.
38
Past Due Loans: Included in the amounts listed above as 90 days or more past due are commercial and industrial, real estate, and a diversity of secured consumer loans. These loans are well secured and in the process of collection. These figures do not include loans in nonaccrual status.
Foreclosed Collateral: While it may include other types of property such as vehicles, since such property is generally sold very quickly after repossession, foreclosed collateral consists primarily of real estate properties obtained through foreclosure or accepted in lieu of foreclosure that take longer to sell. At December 31st for each of the past five years, the foreclosed collateral consisted solely of real estate. As of March 31, 2007, a small business administration (SBA) loan of $57,000 was added to the foreclosed collateral category.
As of March 31, 2007, the balance of nonperforming loans has increased by $2.2 million since December 31, 2006. This increase is driven by two residential construction loans, which the Bank expects to collect on during the year. However, no other negative trends in residential construction lending are being experienced at this time. The ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans of 0.35% indicates that the credit quality of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2007 remains strong. However, should unemployment or interest rates increase during 2007, several portfolios could be negatively impacted, which could result in deteriorating credit quality.
OTHER ASSETS
Other assets increased by $37.7 million or 15.9%. The increase in other assets as of March 31, 2007 compared to December 31, 2006 is largely attributable to increases in our investment in FHLB Stock of $21.5 million, increases in our investment in Tax Credit funds of $10.5 million, seasonal increases in prepaid assets of $5.4 million and increases in accounts receivables for RAL cross-collections of $3.3 million.
The investment in FHLB Stock is classified as other assets and carried at cost per SFAS Statement No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities as there is no readily determinable fair market value. As FHLB advances increase, the Company is required to increase the investment in FHLB Stock. Dividends received for the investment in FHLB Stock are recorded in other income.
DEPOSITS
On a consolidated basis, deposits decreased by $37.1 million since December 31, 2006. A majority of the decrease is attributed to the maturity of $154.8 million of brokered CDs to provide funding for the RAL/RT Programs during the first quarter of 2007, which is included in time certificates of $100,000 or more. At the same time, non-interest bearing deposits increased by $115.8 million due to the lag between the issuance of RAL checks and the time it takes for the taxpayers to cash the checks.
LONG-TERM DEBT AND OTHER BORROWINGS
Long-term debt and other borrowings decreased by $127.8 million since December 31, 2006. The decrease is mostly attributable to the selling of securities from the 2003 and 2004 leveraging portfolio during the first quarter of 2007. Funds received from the sale of securities were used to paydown high interest borrowings during the first quarter.
ACCRUED INTEREST PAYABLE AND OTHER LIABILITIES
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities was $136.3 million as of March 31, 2007 versus $73.5 million as of December 31, 2006, an increase of $62.7 million. The significant items attributed to the $62.7 million increase include:
| an increase in our tax liability of $39.0 million, |
| an increase in other payables for the commitment to purchase additional Tax Credit funds of $10.5 million, |
| an increase in undisbursed RAL proceeds of $9.4 million, |
| an increase of $7.1 million for unearned fees on RAL loans as of March 31, 2007, |
39
| a reduction of other liabilities due to federal and state income tax payments of $4.3 million. |
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Stockholders equity increases with net income of the Company, selling of the Companys stock, exercising of options, vesting of restricted stock grants and changes in OCI and decreases with payments of dividends, stock repurchases, losses in net income and changes in OCI. Since December 31, 2006, stockholders equity increased $51.6 million. Net income of $58.1 million is the largest component of the increase in stockholders equity, offset by the payment of dividends in the first quarter of 2007 of $10.4 million. The remainder of the change is a combination of option exercises, vesting of restricted stock grants, and changes in OCI due to unrealized gains and losses on securities.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of March 31, 2007, under current regulatory definitions, the Company and PCBNA were well-capitalized, the highest of the five categories defined under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA). The following table presents a comparison of regulatory ratios for March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006. These regulatory ratios are monitored and regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB) as discussed in our 2006 10-K.
Capital Ratios:
Pacific Capital Bancorp Actual |
Minimums for Capital Adequacy Purposes |
Minimums to be Well-Capitalized |
||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | ||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Tier I & Tier II Capital |
$ | 765,164 | 12.5 | % | $ | 489,156 | 8.0 | % | $ | 611,445 | 10.0 | % | ||||||
Tier I Capital |
$ | 582,274 | 9.5 | % | $ | 244,578 | 4.0 | % | $ | 366,867 | 6.0 | % | ||||||
Tier I Capital |
$ | 582,274 | 7.3 | % | $ | 320,994 | 4.0 | % | $ | 401,242 | 5.0 | % | ||||||
Risk Weighted Assets |
$ | 6,114,449 | ||||||||||||||||
Average Tangible Assets for the Quarter |
$ | 8,024,845 | ||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Tier I & Tier II Capital |
$ | 710,388 | 11.7 | % | $ | 483,697 | 8.0 | % | $ | 604,622 | 10.0 | % | ||||||
Tier I Capital |
$ | 530,469 | 8.8 | % | $ | 241,849 | 4.0 | % | $ | 362,773 | 6.0 | % | ||||||
Tier I Capital |
$ | 530,469 | 7.4 | % | $ | 284,970 | 4.0 | % | $ | 356,213 | 5.0 | % | ||||||
Risk Weighted Assets |
$ | 6,046,215 | ||||||||||||||||
Average Tangible Assets for the Quarter |
$ | 7,124,254 |
40
Share Repurchases
In prior years, the Company occasionally repurchased shares of its common stock to offset the increased number of shares issued as a result of the exercise of employee stock options and as part of its dividend reinvestment program. Share purchases are generally conducted as open-market transactions.
At March 31, 2007, approximately $18.9 million remained in the 2003 authorization to repurchase outstanding shares. No shares were repurchased in the first three months of 2007 or during 2006.
Future Sources and Uses of Capital and Expected Ratios
Net income is the major source to maintain the capital growth for the Company while payment of dividends reduces capital. There are three primary considerations Management must keep in mind in managing capital levels and ratios. The first is the Company must be able to meet the credit needs of our customers when they need to borrow. The second consideration is that the Company must be prepared to sell some of the loans it originates in order to manage capital targets. The third consideration is that as loan demand picks up in an improving economy, raising additional capital may be necessary. Management investigates the issuance of alternate forms of capital securities as well as common stock on an on-going basis.
Management intends to take the actions necessary to ensure that the Company and the Bank will continue to exceed the capital ratios required for well-capitalized institutions.
Impact of RAL/RT Programs on Capital Adequacy
Formal measurement of the capital ratios for the Company and PCBNA are done at each quarter-end. However, the Company does more frequent estimates of its capital classification during late January and early February of each year because of the large amount of RAL loans. Management estimates that, were it to do a formal computation, on certain days during those weeks, PCBNA may be classified as adequately capitalized, rather than well-capitalized. The Company has discussed this with its regulators and creditors.
In Note 8, Refund Anticipation Loan and Refund Transfer Programs of our Consolidated Financial Statements of this 10-Q and Note 11, Securitizations and Servicing of Financial Assets of our Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2006 10-K is a description of the securitization that the Company utilizes as one of its sources for funding RALs. This RAL securitization is a true sale of loans to other financial institutions, and except for the capital that must be allocated for the small-retained interest kept by the Company, the sales reduce the impact on the capital ratios for the Company.
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity is the ability to effectively raise funds on a timely basis to meet cash needs of our customers and the Company, whether it be to handle fluctuations in deposits, to provide for customers credit needs, or to take advantage of investment opportunities as they are presented in the market place.
The Companys objective, managed through the Companys Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO), is to ensure adequate liquidity at all times by maintaining adequate liquid assets, the ability to raise deposits and liabilities, and having access to additional funds via the capital markets.
For the Company, the most significant challenge relating to liquidity management is providing sufficient liquidity to fund the large amount of RALs, primarily in late January and early February of each year. In addition to the discussion above the following considerations are kept in mind in providing the needed liquidity:
| Using a large number of institutions so as to not become overly reliant on a limited number of institutions or a particular type of funding vehicle; |
| Using a mixture of committed and uncommitted lines so as to assure a minimum amount of funding in the event of tight liquidity in the markets; and |
| Arranging for at least 30% more funding than is anticipated to be needed on the peak-funding day for RALs. |
The securitization of RAL loans assists in the management of the Companys capital position during the RAL season by selling some RALs to third parties. In addition, the securitization program represents yet another source of liquidity as the proceeds from the sales are lent out to new RAL customers.
41
RALs present the Company with some special funding and liquidity needs. Funds are needed for RAL lending only for the very short period of time that RALs are outstanding. The season starts in January and continues into April, but even within that time frame, RAL originations are highly concentrated in the last week of January and first two weeks of February. The Company must arrange for a significant amount of very short-term borrowing capacity. A portion of the need can be met by borrowing overnight from other financial institutions through the use of Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements. These two sources match the short-term nature of the RALs and therefore are an efficient source of funding. However, they are not sufficient to meet the total need for funds, and other sources like advances from the FHLB and brokered deposits must be used. Extensive funding planning is accomplished prior to the RAL season to make effective and efficient use of various funding sources.
Beginning in late January, the IRS pays refunds to the Company each Friday. This allows the Company to repay up to all of its overnight borrowing and still have an excess of cash that must be invested. Included in the IRS payments are RTs. While RTs are strictly a processing business and do not involve an extension of credit, the Company benefits liquidity-wise from the float on RTs that are issued as paper checks.
As mentioned in our 2006 10-K, Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 11, Securitizations and Servicing of Financial Assets of the Financial Statements and in this 10-Q, Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8, Refund Anticipation Loan and Refund Transfer Programs, the Company has also securitized some of the RALs.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The Company cannot operate risk-free and make a profit. Instead, the process of risk definition and assessment allows the Company to select the appropriate level of risk for the anticipated level of reward and then decide on the steps necessary to manage this risk. The key risk factors affecting our business are addressed in Item 1A, Risk Factors in our 2006 10-K. Changes in interest rates can potentially have a significant impact on earnings. The Company has addressed the risks associated with interest rate risk in the section below.
INTEREST RATE RISK
With such a large proportion of the Companys income derived from net interest income, it is important to understand how the Company is subject to interest rate risk. Some reasons are as follows:
| In general, for a given change in interest rates, the amount of the change in value up or down is larger for instruments with longer remaining maturities. For instance, the shape of the yield curve may affect new loan yields and funding costs differently. |
| The remaining maturity of various assets or liabilities may shorten or lengthen as interest rates change. For example, if long-term mortgage interest rates decline sharply, adjustable rate mortgages may prepay, or paydown, faster than anticipated, thus reducing future cash flows and interest income. |
| Repricing frequencies and maturity profiles for assets and liabilities may occur at different times. For example, in a falling rate environment, if assets reprice faster than liabilities there will be an initial decline in earnings. Moreover, if assets and liabilities reprice at the same time, they may not be by the same increment. For instance, if the Federal funds rate increased 50 bps, demand deposits may rise by 10 bps, whereas prime based loans will instantly rise 50 bps. |
Monthly evaluations, monitoring and management of interest rate risk (including market risk, mismatch risk and basis risk) compares our most likely rate scenario, base case, with various earnings simulations using many interest rate scenarios. These scenarios differ in the direction of interest rate changes, the degree of change over time, the speed of change and the projected shape of the yield curve. These results are prepared by the Treasury department and presented to the ALCO each month for further consideration.
Net Interest Income (NII) and Economic Value of Equity (EVE) Simulations
The results of the asset liability model indicate how much of the Companys net interest income and net economic value are at risk (deviation from the base case) from +/- 2% shocks. This exercise is valuable in identifying risk exposures and in comparing the Companys interest rate risk profile relative to other financial intermediaries.
42
The EVE and NII results as of March 31, 2007 are displayed in the table below. These figures indicate that the Companys net interest income at risk over a one-year period and net economic value at risk are well within the adopted ALCO policy ranges.
RATE SENSITIVITY
The simulation indicates a 4.5% improvement in the Up 200 scenario for net interest income (NII) over the next 12 months, using a scenario in which the Federal funds rate immediately increases 200 basis points to 7.25%. As indicated above, with respect to net interest income over the next year, the Company has managed its Interest Rate Risk to mitigate against a FOMC restrictive monetary policy.
Simulation estimates depend on, and will change, with the size and mix of the actual and projected balance sheet at the time of each simulation. Management is unaware of any material limitations such that results would not reflect the net interest risk exposures of the Company. However, no model is a perfect description of the complexity of a banks balance sheet, and actual results are certain to differ from any models predicted results. There are no material positions, instruments or transactions that are not included in the modeling or included instruments that have special features that are not included.
The Company does not have a significant amount of derivative instruments. Also, almost all of those instruments the Company does have are offsetting instruments where increases in income, expenses, or value from some of the swaps are offset by expenses, income, or loss from the rest. Consequently, these instruments do not need to be specifically addressed in the model.
Financial instruments do not respond in a parallel fashion to rising or falling interest rates. This causes an asymmetry in the magnitude of changes in net interest income and net economic value resulting from the hypothetical increases and decreases in rates. It is therefore mandatory to monitor interest rate risk and adjust our funding strategies to mitigate adverse effects of interest rate shifts on the Companys balance sheet. While derivative
43
instruments are effective hedging tools, the Company has been successful at maintaining its interest rate risk profile within policy limits strictly from pro-active deposit pricing and funding strategies. In the future, however, other strategies may be implemented to manage interest rate risk. These strategies may include, but may not be limited to, utilizing interest rate derivatives, buying or selling loans or securities, and entering into other interest rate risk management instruments and techniques.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2007.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
44
45
46
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. |
Information regarding legal proceedings is incorporated by reference from Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
In addition to the other information set forth in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in the 2006 Form 10-K, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results.
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
During 2003, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $40.0 million of its common stock. At March 31, 2007, $18.9 million remained to repurchase outstanding shares. This authorization has no expiration date and the Company had no prior plans that expired during the current reporting period.
Shares available for repurchase:
(dollars in thousands) | Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased |
Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) |
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs | ||||||
Period |
||||||||||
Begin Date |
End Date |
|||||||||
1/1/2007 |
1/31/2007 | | | | $18,933 | |||||
2/1/2007 |
2/28/2007 | | | | $18,933 | |||||
3/1/2007 |
3/31/2007 | | | | $18,933 | |||||
Total |
| | | $18,933 | ||||||
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the current reporting period covered by this report. On April 2, 2007 we filed our proxy statement with the SEC and, announced our annual meeting of our shareholders on April 24, 2007. At the annual meeting, a vote of our shareholders took place on two separate items. The results of the votes will be presented in our second quarter Form 10-Q.
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
47
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
Exhibit Number |
Description | |||
10.22 | Employment Agreement dated March 29, 2007, between Pacific Capital Bancorp, Pacific Capital Bank, N.A., and George S. Leis. Herein incorporated by reference filed as Exhibit 10.1 on Form 8-K on March 30, 2007. | |||
31. | Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002** | |||
31.1 | Certification of George S. Leis | |||
31.2 | Certification of Joyce M. Clinton | |||
32. | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |||
32.1 | Certification of George S. Leis | |||
32.2 | Certification of Joyce M. Clinton |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized:
PACIFIC CAPITAL BANCORP
/s/ George S. Leis | May 9, 2007 | |||||
George S. Leis President Chief Executive Officer |
||||||
/s/ Joyce M. Clinton | May 9, 2007 | |||||
Joyce M. Clinton Executive Vice President Chief Executive Officer |
48