Edgar Filing: BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

Form 10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-35522

BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Maryland		04-3639825
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)
18500 Von Karman Ave, Suite 1100, Irvine, California		92612
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) (949) 236-5211

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Depositary Shares each representing a 1/40th Interest in a share of 8.00% Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C		The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
7.50% Senior Notes Due April 15, 2020		The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES ¨ NO x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. YES ¨ NO x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	¨		Accelerated filer	x
Non-accelerated filer	¨	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES ¨ NO x

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the closing price of such stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC as of June 30, 2013, was $200.9 million. (The exclusion from such amount of the market value of the shares owned by any person shall not be deemed an admission by the registrant that such person is an affiliate of the registrant.) As of March 3, 2014, the registrant had outstanding 19,689,430 shares of voting common stock and 590,068 shares of Class B non-voting common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

PART III of Form 10-K—Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2014.

BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

FORM 10-K

December 31, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS



PART I		1

Item 1.	Business	2
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	30
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	43
Item 2.	Properties	44
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	44
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	44

PART II		45

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	45
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	48
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	49
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	92
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	95
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	192
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	192
Item 9B.	Other Information	193

PART III		194

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	194
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	194
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	194
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	195
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	195

PART IV		196

Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	196

SIGNATURES		202

EXHIBIT INDEX

PART I

Forward-looking Statements

When used in this report and in public shareholder communications, in other documents of Banc of California, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our”) filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the words or phrases “believe,” “will,” “should,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project,” “plans,” “guidance” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. These statements may relate to our future financial performance, strategic plans or objectives, revenue, expense or earnings projections, or other financial items. By their nature, these statements are subject to numerous uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the statements.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated or projected include, but are not limited to, the following:

risks that the Company’s recently completed acquisitions of The Private Bank of California (PBOC), The Palisades Group, and CS Financial and/or the recent merger of the Company’s subsidiary banks may disrupt current plans and operations, the potential difficulties in customer and employee retention as a result of the transaction and the amount of the costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the transaction;

ii.

The possibility that the changing of the Bank’s charter to a national bank charter or its name to Banc of California could cause customer reaction that negatively impacts the bank;

iii.

a worsening of current economic conditions, as well as turmoil in the financial markets;

iv.

the credit risks of lending activities, which may be affected by deterioration in real estate markets and the financial condition of borrowers, may lead to increased loan and lease delinquencies, losses and nonperforming assets in our loan and lease portfolio, and may result in our allowance for loan and lease losses not being adequate to cover actual losses and require us to materially increase our loan and lease loss reserves;

the quality and composition of our securities portfolio;

vi.

changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas;

vii.

continuation of the historically low short-term interest rate environment, changes in the levels of general interest rates, and the relative differences between short- and long-term interest rates, deposit interest rates, our net interest margin and funding sources;

viii.

fluctuations in the demand for loans and leases, the number of unsold homes and other properties and fluctuations in commercial and residential real estate values in our market area;

ix.

results of examinations of us by regulatory authorities and the possibility that any such regulatory authority may, among other things, require us to increase our allowance for loan and lease losses, write-down asset values, increase our capital levels, or affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits, which could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings;

legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business, including changes in regulatory capital or other rules;

xi.

our ability to control operating costs and expenses;

xii.

staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of corporate strategies that affect our work force and potential associated charges;

xiii.

errors in our estimates in determining fair value of certain of our assets, which may result in significant declines in valuation;

xiv.

the network and computer systems on which we depend could fail or experience a security breach;

xv.

our ability to attract and retain key members of our senior management team;

xvi.

costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments;

xvii.

increased competitive pressures among financial services companies;

xviii.

changes in consumer spending, borrowing and saving habits;

xix.

adverse changes in the securities markets;

xx.

earthquake, fire or other natural disasters affecting the condition of real estate collateral;

xxi.

the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules or regulations or to respond to regulatory actions;

xxii.

inability of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to us;

xxiii.

changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the Financial Accounting Standards Board or their application to our business, including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods;

xxiv.

war or terrorist activities; and

xxv.

other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, products and services and the other risks described in this report and from time to time in other documents that we file with or furnish to the SEC, including, without limitation, the risks described under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” presented elsewhere in this report.

The Company undertakes no obligation to update any such statement to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date on which the forward-looking statement is made, except as required by law.

Item 1. Business

General

Banc of California, Inc. is a financial holding company and the parent of Banc of California, National Association, a national bank (the Bank), the Palisades Group, LLC, an SEC-registered investment advisor (TPG), and PTB Property Holdings, LLC, an entity formed to hold real estate, cash and fixed income investments (PTB). Prior to October 11, 2013, Banc of California, Inc. was a multi-bank holding company with two banking subsidiaries, Pacific Trust Bank, a federal savings bank (PacTrust Bank or Pacific Trust Bank) and The Private Bank of California (Beach Business Bank prior to July 1, 2013). On October 11, 2013, Banc of California, Inc. became a one-bank holding company when Pacific Trust Bank converted from a federal savings bank to a national bank and changed its name to Banc of California, National Association, and immediately thereafter The Private Bank of California was merged into Banc of California, National Association. On January 17 2014, Banc of California, Inc. became a financial holding company. Unless the context indicates otherwise, references to the “Bank” prior to October 11, 2013 mean Pacific Trust Bank and The Private Bank of California (Beach Business Bank prior to July 1, 2013), collectively, and references to the “Bank” on or after October 11, 2013 refer to Banc of California, National Association. Unless the context indicates otherwise, all references to “Banc of California, Inc.” refer to Banc of California, Inc. excluding its consolidated subsidiaries and all references to the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to Banc of California, Inc. including its consolidated subsidiaries.

The Company was incorporated under Maryland law in March 2002, and in July 2013, the Company changed its name to “Banc of California, Inc.” and, as noted above, in October 2013, the Company’s subsidiary banks merged to form a single, national bank subsidiary under the name Banc of California, National

Association. The Bank has one wholly owned subsidiary, CS Financial, Inc., which was acquired on October 31, 2013. See “Recent Transactions—CS Financial Acquisition.”

Banc of California, Inc. is subject to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve Board or FRB), and the Bank is subject to regulation primarily by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). As a financial holding company, Banc of California, Inc. may engage in activities permissible for bank holding companies and may engage in other activities that are financial in nature or incidental or complementary to activities that are financial in nature, primarily securities, insurance and merchant banking activities. See “Regulation and Supervision.”

Banc of California, Inc. is not an operating company and its assets primarily consist of the outstanding stock of the Bank as well as the outstanding membership interests of TPG and PTB. From time to time, Banc of California, Inc. has purchased impaired loans and leases, investments and other real estate owned (OREO) from the Bank to assure the Bank’s safety and soundness. Banc of California, Inc. has no significant liabilities at the holding company level other than $82.3 million in its 7.50 percent Senior Notes due April 15, 2020 (Senior Notes) and related interest payments, compensation of its executive employees and directors, as well as expenses related to strategic initiatives. Banc of California, Inc. also utilizes the support staff and offices of the Bank and pays the Bank for these services. If Banc of California, Inc. expands or changes its business in the future, it may hire additional employees of its own.

The Bank offers a variety of financial services to meet the banking and financial needs of the communities we serve. The Bank is headquartered in Orange County, California and as of December 31, 2013, the Bank operated 15 branches in San Diego, Orange, and Los Angeles Counties in California and 68 producing mortgage loan production offices in California, Arizona, Oregon, Montana, Virginia and Washington.

The principal business of the Bank consists of attracting retail deposits from the general public and investing these funds primarily in commercial, consumer and real estate secured loans. The Bank solicits deposits in its market area and, to a lesser extent, from institutional depositors nationwide and may accept brokered deposits.

The Bank’s deposit product and service offerings include checking, savings, money market, certificates of deposit, retirement accounts as well as mobile, online, cash and treasury management, card payment services, remote deposit, ACH origination, employer/employee retirement planning, telephone banking, automated bill payment, electronic statements, safe deposit boxes, direct deposit and wire transfers. Bank customers also have the ability to access their accounts through a nationwide network of over 30,000 surcharge-free ATMs.

The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 18500 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1100, California, and its telephone number is (949) 236-5211. Banc of California, Inc.’s voting common stock, the depository shares each representing a 1/40^th interest in a share of its 8.00 percent Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, and its Senior Notes are listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbols BANC, BANCP and BANCL, respectively.

The reports, proxy statements and other information that Banc of California, Inc. files with the SEC, as well as news releases, are available free of charge through the Company’s Internet site at http://www.bancofcal.com. This information can be found on the BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC. “News” or “Investor relations” pages of our Internet site. The annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed and furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act are available as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been filed or furnished to the SEC. Reference to the Company’s Internet address is not intended to incorporate any of the information contained on our Internet site into this document.

Strategy

The Company is committed to building the top full-service bank serving California’s diverse private businesses, entrepreneurs, and homeowners, and investing in and growing complementary businesses that enhance shareholder value.

Our overall strategy is comprised of specific growth and operating objectives. The key elements of that strategy are:

Growth Strategies

•

Build California’s Bank

•

Extend branch footprint throughout attractive markets in California

•

Enhance suite of simple, fair products to meet needs of small businesses, entrepreneurs, homeowners including Residential Lending, Commercial Real Estate Lending, Private Banking, Entertainment Banking, Small / Middle Market Lending, C&I and SBA Lending, Multi-Family Lending

•

The Company successfully completed two bank acquisitions in 2012 and one bank acquisition in 2013, each of which included a team of local commercial lending officers which has given us a greater network and far greater capacity to attract commercial and private banking relationships. The Company will seek to continue to develop its commercial lending activities through strategic “lift outs” of lending teams in various geographic markets that have particular business “niches” and “specialty.”

•

The Company has successfully attracted and launched several new loan origination groups through acquisitions and the new hire process. These include the acquisition of The Palisades Group and CS Financial as well as the hiring and launch of our Financial Institutions Bank (which has a product offerings such as securities backed lines of credit, insurance backed lines of credit and financial advisor acquisition financing), our multi-family and CRE lending teams, and equipment finance teams. We will seek to continue to diversify our lending capabilities through our hiring and M&A process.

•

Develop simple, fair deposit products: checking, CD, analysis and cash management

•

Implement a robust CRA plan focused on integrating with and investing in our communities

•

Invest in Complementary Financial Services Businesses

•

The Company seeks to invest in and grow mutually complementary financial services businesses either as part of its subsidiary bank or through other non-bank subsidiaries. In 2013, these efforts resulted in the acquisition of The Palisades Group (an asset management and investment advisory businesses focused on whole loans, which became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company) and CS Financial (a private mortgage bank serving high net worth borrowers throughout California, which became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank).

•

Continue as a public company with a common stock that is quoted and traded on a national stock market. In addition to providing access to growth capital in a diversified approach, such as common or preferred stock and debt, we believe a “public currency” provides flexibility in structuring acquisitions and will allow us to attract and retain qualified management through equity-based compensation.

Operating Strategies

•

Achieve appropriate scale and profitability for each line of business.

•

Execute its focused value proposition and marketing to become California’s Bank.

•

Enhance the Company’s risk management functions by proactively managing sound procedures and committing experienced human resources to this effort. We seek (i) to identify risks in all functions of our business, including credit, operations and asset and liability management, (ii) to evaluate such risks and their trends and (iii) to adopt strategies to manage such risks based upon our evaluations.

•

Maintain and improve asset quality through prudent loan underwriting standards and credit risk management practices.

•

Actively manage interest rate and market risks by closely matching the volume and maturity of our interest sensitive assets to our interest sensitive liabilities in order to mitigate adverse effects of rapid changes in interest rates on either side of our balance sheet.

•

Expand lending, to California’s private businesses, entrepreneurs and homeowners, which commonly are associated with deposits that are a lower cost and/or more stable funding source.

•

Share the success of the Company with employees aligned with shareholders by establishing the Employee Equity Ownership Plan effective October 15, 2013 to make every employee a shareholder, subject to vesting, as of their 90^th day of employment.

Recent Transactions

CS Financial Acquisition

Effective October 31, 2013, the Company acquired CS Financial, Inc. (CS Financial), which became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank. CS Financial specializes in higher balance residential mortgage loans that serve the Bank’s high net worth individual, entrepreneur and family office clients, and the Bank believes the acquisition of CS Financial will increase its origination of such loan products.

The CS Financial acquisition was accounted for under GAAP guidance for business combinations. The purchased assets, including identifiable intangible assets and assumed liabilities were recorded at their estimated fair values as of October 31, 2013. Because of the short time period between acquisition date and December 31, 2013, the Company used significant estimates and assumptions to value the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The closing date valuations related to loans, premises, equipment, capital leases, other intangible assets, other assets, and assumed liabilities are considered preliminary and could differ significantly when finalized.

For additional information regarding this transaction, see Notes 2 and 25 of the notes to consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 of this report.

Branch Sales

Effective October 4, 2013, the Company completed the sale of eight branches to AmericanWest Bank, a Washington state chartered bank (AWB). The transaction provided for the transfer of deposits of $464.3 million and its related assets to AWB in exchange for a deposit premium of 2.3 percent applied to certain deposit balances transferred. Certain other assets related to the branches included the real estate for three of the branch locations and certain overdraft and other credit facilities related to the deposit accounts. The branches were located in San Diego, Riverside and Los Angeles Counties. The sale was done to reshape the Bank’s branch network to focus on serving small-to-mid sized businesses and high net worth families throughout Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego counties.

For additional information regarding this transaction, see Note 2 of the notes to consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 of this report.

The Palisades Group, LLC Acquisition

Effective September 10, 2013, the Company acquired The Palisades Group, LLC (Palisades), a Delaware limited liability company and a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, pursuant to the terms of the Amended and Restated Units Purchase Agreement dated as of November 30, 2012, amended and restated as of August 12, 2013. Palisades provides financial advisory and asset management services to third parties, including the Bank, with respect to the purchase, sale and management of residential mortgage loans.

The Palisades acquisition was accounted for under GAAP guidance for business combinations. The assets and liabilities were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the September 10, 2013 acquisition date. No goodwill was recognized.

For additional information regarding this transaction, see Notes 2 and 25 of the notes to consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 of this report.

The Private Bank of California Acquisition

Effective July 1, 2013, the Company completed its acquisition of The Private Bank of California (PBOC) pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 21, 2012, as amended (the Merger Agreement), by and between the Company, Beach Business Bank (Beach) (then a separate subsidiary bank of the Company) and PBOC. PBOC merged with and into Beach, with Beach continuing as the surviving entity in the merger and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and changing its name to “The Private Bank of California.” As noted above, on October 11, 2013, The Private Bank of California was merged with the Company’s other wholly owned banking subsidiary, Banc of California, National Association (formerly Pacific Trust Bank.)

Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company paid aggregate merger consideration of (1) 2,082,654 shares of Company common stock (valued at $28.3 million based on the $13.58 per share closing price of Company common stock on July 1, 2013), and (2) $25.3 million in cash. Additionally, the Company paid out $2.7 million for certain outstanding options to acquire PBOC common stock in accordance with the merger agreement and converted outstanding PBOC stock options to the Company’s stock options with an assumed fair value of approximately $30 thousand. On the basis of the number of shares of PBOC common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the Merger, each outstanding share of PBOC common stock was converted into the right to receive $6.52 in cash and 0.5379 shares of Company common stock.

In addition, upon completion of the acquisition, each share of preferred stock issued by PBOC as part of the Small Business Lending Fund (SBLF) program of the United States Department of Treasury (10,000 shares in the aggregate with a liquidation preference amount of $1,000 per share) was converted automatically into one substantially identical share of preferred stock of the Company. The terms of the preferred stock issued by the Company in exchange for the PBOC preferred stock are substantially identical to the preferred stock previously issued by the Company as part of its own participation in the SBLF program (32,000 shares in aggregate with a liquidation preference amount of $1,000 per share).

PBOC provided a range of financial services, including credit and deposit products as well as cash management services, from its headquarters located in the Century City area of Los Angeles, California as well as full-service branches in Hollywood and Irvine, and a loan production office in downtown Los Angeles. PBOC’s target clients included high-net worth and high income individuals, business professionals and their professional service firms, business owners, entertainment service businesses and non-profit organizations.

In accordance with GAAP guidance for business combinations, the Company has expensed approximately $2.6 million of direct acquisition costs and recorded $15.0 million of goodwill and $10.4 million of other intangible assets. The other intangible assets are primarily related to core deposits and are being amortized on an accelerated basis over 2-7 years. Loans that were acquired from PBOC that were considered credit-impaired were written down at the acquisition date in accordance with purchase accounting to fair value. In addition, the allowance for loan losses for all PBOC loans was not carried over to the Company’s allowance for loan and lease losses. A full valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset was recorded as well. For tax purposes purchase accounting adjustments, including goodwill are all nontaxable and/or non-deductible. Certain valuations related to assumed liabilities are considered preliminary and could differ significantly when finalized.

Gateway Bancorp Acquisition

Effective August 18, 2012, the Company acquired Gateway Bancorp, the holding company of Gateway Business Bank (Gateway) pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement) dated June 3, 2011, as amended on November 28, 2011, February 24, 2012, June 30, 2012, and July 31, 2012. The acquisition was accomplished by the Company’s purchase of all of the outstanding stock of Gateway Bancorp for $15.4 million in cash.

Gateway operated branches in Lakewood and Laguna Hills, California. As part of the acquisition, Mission Hills Mortgage Bankers, a division of Gateway, including its 22 loan production offices in California, Arizona,

Oregon and Washington, became a part of the Bank’s mortgage banking operations. Gateway’s consolidated assets and equity (unaudited) as of August 17, 2012 totaled $175.5 million and $25.8 million, respectively. The acquired assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition.

In accordance with GAAP guidance for business combinations, the Company recorded $11.6 million of bargain purchase gain and $1.7 million of other intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2012. The other intangible assets are related to $720 thousand of core deposits, which are being amortized on an accelerated basis over 4 - 6 years, and $955 thousand of trade name intangible which is being amortized over 20 years. For tax purposes the purchase accounting adjustments and bargain purchase gain are non-taxable and/or non-deductible. Due to circumstances that Gateway faced at the time the acquisition was negotiated, which include regulatory orders and operating losses, the terms negotiated included a purchase price that was $5 million lower than Gateway Bancorp’s equity book value. The discount was further increased to $6.5 million in exchange for the elimination of any contingent liability to the shareholder of Gateway Bancorp related to mortgage repurchase risk. Due to delays in obtaining regulatory approval, the transaction closed nine months later than originally planned. This passage of time allowed Gateway to eliminate all regulatory orders, return to profitability, improve asset quality, and increase the book value of equity by reducing the expected discount on assets.

Beach Business Bank Acquisition

Effective July 1, 2012, the Company acquired Beach Business Bank pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Beach Merger Agreement) dated August 30, 2011, as amended October 31, 2011. At the effective time of the transaction, a newly formed and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (Merger Sub) merged with and into Beach (the Merger), with Beach continuing as the surviving entity in the Merger and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Pursuant and subject to the terms of the Beach Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of Beach common stock (other than specified shares owned by the Company, Merger Sub or Beach, and other than in the case of shares in respect of, or underlying, certain Beach options and other equity awards, which were treated as set forth in the Beach Merger Agreement) was converted into the right to receive $9.21415 in cash and one warrant. Each warrant entitled the holder to purchase 0.33 of a share of Company common stock at an exercise price of $14.00 per share for a period of one year. All of the warrants expired on June 30, 2013 without being exercised. The aggregate cash consideration paid to Beach shareholders in the Merger was approximately $39.1 million. In addition, Beach shareholders received in aggregate warrants to purchase the equivalent of 1,401,959 shares of the Company’s common stock with an estimated fair value of $1.0 million.

Beach (re-named The Private Bank of California effective July 1, 2013 and merged with Pacific Trust Bank on October 11, 2013 to form the Bank) operated branches in Manhattan Beach, Long Beach, and Costa Mesa, California. Beach also has a division named The Doctors Bank^®, which serves physicians and dentists nationwide. Additionally, Beach provided loans to small businesses based on Small Business Administration (SBA) lending programs, which the Bank continues to provide. Beach’s consolidated assets and equity (unaudited) as of June 30, 2012 totaled $311.9 million and $33.3 million, respectively. The acquired assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition.

In accordance with GAAP guidance for business combinations, the Company recorded $7.0 million of goodwill and $4.5 million of other intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2012. The other intangible assets were primarily related to core deposits and are being amortized on an accelerated basis over 2 - 7 years. For tax purposes purchase accounting adjustments, including goodwill are all non-taxable and/or non-deductible.

Lending Activities

Governance

The Company conducts its lending activities under a system of risk governance controls. A key element of our risk governance structure is our risk appetite framework and risk appetite statement. The risk appetite

framework adopted by the Company and the Bank has been developed in conjunction with the Company’s strategic and capital plans. The strategic and capital plans articulate the Board approved balance sheet and loan concentration targets and the appropriate level of capital to properly manage our risks.

The risk appetite framework provides the overall approach, including policies, processes, controls, and systems through which the risk appetite is established, communicated, and monitored. The risk appetite framework utilizes a risk assessment process to identify inherent risks across the Company, gauge the effectiveness of our internal controls, and establish tolerances for residual risk in each of the regulatory risk categories: credit, market (interest rate and price risks), liquidity, operational, compliance, strategic, and reputational. Each risk category is assigned risk ratings with a target overall residual risk rating for the organization. The risk appetite framework includes a risk appetite statement, risk limits, and an outline of roles and responsibilities of those overseeing the implementation and monitoring of the framework. The risk appetite statement is an expression of the maximum level of risk that we are prepared to accept in order to achieve our business objectives. Defining, communicating, and monitoring risk appetite is fundamental to a safe and sound control environment and a risk-focused culture. The Board of Directors establishes the Company’s strategic objectives and approves the Company’s risk appetite statement, which is developed in collaboration with the chief executive officer, chief risk officer, general counsel, chief financial officer, and business unit leaders. The executive team translates the Board approved strategic objectives and the risk appetite statement into targets and constraints for business lines and legal entities to follow.

The risk appetite framework is supported by an enterprise risk management program. Enterprise risk management at the Company integrates all risk efforts under one common framework. Key elements of enterprise risk management that are intended to support prudent lending activities include:

•

Policies— Loan policy articulates the credit culture of our lending business and provides clarity around encouraged and discouraged lending activities. Additional policies cover key business segments of the portfolio, for example Commercial Real Estate Policy, and other important aspects supporting our lending activities, for example appraisal, risk ratings, fair lending, etc.

•

Credit Approval Authorities— all material credit exposures of the Bank are approved by a credit risk management group that is independent of the business units. Above this threshold, credit approvals are made by the chief credit officer or an executive management committee of the Bank. The enterprise risk committee of the Board reviews/approves material loan pool purchases/divestitures and any other transactions as appropriate.

•

Concentration Policy and Guidelines—To mitigate and manage the risk within the Company’s loan portfolio, the Board of Directors established certain concentration guidelines which it expects to review and revise from time to time as appropriate. It is anticipated that these guidelines will be reviewed regularly and may change at any time including pursuant to quarterly or annual reviews. For instance, the Company’s Board expects to review the concentration guidelines when considering material strategic initiatives such as acquisitions and new product launches. The Company has developed policies relating to the appropriate actions to be taken should management seek to increase the concentration guidelines or exceed the guideline maximum, including for good reason. These concentration guidelines are not meant to be restrictive limits, but are intended to aid management and the Board to ensure that the Bank’s loan concentrations are consistent with the Board’s risk appetite.

•

Stress Testing– the Bank has developed a stress test policy and stress testing methodology as a tool to evaluate our loan portfolio, capital levels and strategic plan with the objective of ensuring that our loan portfolio and balance sheet concentrations are consistent with the Board approved risk appetite and strategic and capital plans.

•

Loan Portfolio Management— the Bank has an internal asset review committee that formally reviews the loan portfolio on a regular basis. Risk rating trends, loan portfolio performance, including delinquency status, and the resolution of problem assets are reviewed and evaluated.

•

Commercial Real Estate Loan Pricing, Multi-Family Loan Pricing and Residential Loan Pricing—Regular discussions occur between Treasury, Capital Markets, Credit and Risk Management and the Business units with regard to the pricing of our loan products. These committees meet to ensure that the Bank is pricing its products appropriately to meet our strategic and capital plans while ensuring an appropriate return for shareholders.

General

The Company offers a number of different commercial and consumer loan products, including commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, multi-family loans, SBA guaranteed business loans, construction and renovation loans, lease financing, one-to-four family residential (single family residential and SFR) mortgage loans, warehouse loans, asset or security backed loans, home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), consumer and business lines of credit, home equity loans and other consumer loans.

Legal lending limits are calculated in conformance with OCC regulations, which prohibit a national bank from lending to any one individual or entity or its related interests on any amount that exceeds 15 percent of the bank’s capital and surplus, plus an additional 10 percent of the bank’s capital and surplus, if the amount that exceeds the bank’s 15 percent general limit is fully secured by readily marketable collateral. At December 31, 2013, the Bank’s authorized legal lending limits for loans to one borrower were $54.1 million for unsecured loans plus an additional $36.1 million for specific secured loans.

Commercial and Industrial Loans

Commercial and industrial loans are made to finance operations, provide working capital, or to finance the purchase of assets, equipment or inventory. A borrower’s cash flow from operations is generally the primary source of repayment. Accordingly, our policies provide specific guidelines regarding debt coverage and other important financial ratios. Commercial and industrial loans include lines of credit and commercial term loans. Lines of credit are extended to businesses or individuals based on the financial strength and integrity of the borrower and guarantor(s) and generally are collateralized by short-term assets such as accounts receivable, inventory, equipment or real estate and have a maturity of one year or less. Commercial term loans are typically made to finance the acquisition of fixed assets or refinance short-term debt originally used to purchase fixed assets. Commercial term loans generally have terms of one to five years. They may be collateralized by the asset being acquired or other available assets.

Commercial and industrial loans include short-term secured and unsecured business and commercial loans with maturities typically ranging up to 5 years (up to 10 years if a SBA loan), accounts receivable financing typically for 1-5 years (up to 10 years if a SBA loan), and equipment leases up to 6 years. The interest rates on these loans generally are adjustable and usually are indexed to The Wall Street Journal’s prime rate or LIBOR and will vary based on market conditions and be commensurate to the credit risk. Where it can be negotiated, loans are written with a floor rate of interest. Generally, lines of credit are granted for no more than a 12-month period.

Commercial and industrial loans, including accounts receivable and inventory financing, generally are made to businesses that have been in operation for at least 5 years or less if a SBA loan, including start-ups. To qualify for such loans, prospective borrowers generally must have debt-to-net worth ratios not exceeding 3-to-1, operating cash flow sufficient to demonstrate the ability to pay obligations as they become due, and good payment histories as evidenced by credit reports. We attempt to control our risk by generally requiring loan-to-value (LTV) ratios of not more than 80 percent and by closely and regularly monitoring the amount and value of the collateral in order to maintain that ratio.

The Company’s commercial and industrial business lending policy includes credit file documentation and analysis of the borrower’s background, capacity to repay the loan, the adequacy of the borrower’s capital and collateral as well as an evaluation of other conditions affecting the borrower. Analysis of the borrower’s past,

present and future cash flows is also an important aspect of our credit analysis. In order to mitigate the risk of borrower default, we generally require collateral to support the credit or, in the case of loans made to businesses, personal guarantees from their owners, or both. In addition, all such loans must have well-defined primary and secondary sources of repayment. Nonetheless, these loans are believed to carry higher credit risk than traditional single-family home loans.

Commercial and industrial loans are typically made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial and industrial loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the business itself (which, in turn, is often dependent in part upon general economic conditions). The Company’s commercial business loans are usually, but not always, secured by business assets. However, the collateral securing the loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. See “—Asset Quality—Non-Performing Assets” in Item 7.

Commercial and industrial loan growth also assists in the growth of our deposits because many commercial loan borrowers establish noninterest-bearing (demand) and interest-bearing transaction deposit accounts and banking services relationships with us. Those deposit accounts help us to reduce our overall cost of funds and those banking services relationships provide us with a source of non-interest income.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, commercial and industrial loans totaled $287.8 million or 11.8 percent and $80.4 million or 6.4 percent, respectively, of the total gross loans. This increase was due mainly to the acquisition of PBOC as well as loan originations in 2013.

Commercial Real Estate Lending and Multi-Family Real Estate Lending

Commercial real estate and multi-family real estate loans are secured primarily by multi-family dwellings, industrial/warehouse buildings, anchored and non-anchored retail centers, office buildings and hospitality properties, on a limited basis, primarily located in the Company’s market area, and throughout the West Coast. At December 31, 2013, commercial real estate and multi-family real estate loans totaled $529.9 million, or 21.7 percent, and $141.6 million, or 5.8 percent, respectively, of the Company’s total gross loans, as compared to $338.9 million, or 27.1 percent, and $115.1 million, or 9.2 percent, respectively, of the Company’s total gross loans, at December 31, 2012. This increase was due mainly to the acquisition of PBOC as well as loan originations in 2013.

The Company’s loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate are originated with either a fixed or adjustable interest rate. The interest rate on adjustable-rate loans is based on a variety of indices, generally determined through negotiation with the borrower. Loan-to-value ratios on these loans typically do not exceed 75 percent of the appraised value of the property securing the loan. These loans typically require monthly payments, may contain balloon payments and have maximum maturities of 30 years.

Loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate are underwritten based on the income producing potential of the property and the financial strength of the borrower/sponsor. The net operating income, which is the income derived from the operation of the property less all operating expenses, must be sufficient to cover the payments related to the outstanding debt. The Company generally requires an assignment of rents or leases in order to be assured that the cash flow from the project will be used to repay the debt. Appraisals on properties securing multi-family and commercial real estate loans are performed by independent state licensed fee appraisers approved by management. See “—Loan and Lease Originations, Purchases, Sales and Repayments” In item 7. The Company may require the borrower to maintain a tax or insurance escrow account for loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate. In order to monitor the adequacy of cash flows on income-producing properties, the borrower is generally required to provide periodic financial information.

Loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate properties generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. These loans typically involve large balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers.

Because payments on loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate properties are often dependent on the successful operation or management of the properties, repayment of these loans may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. If the cash flow from the project is reduced, or if leases are not obtained or renewed, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. See “—Asset Quality—Non-Performing Assets” in Item 7.

Small Business Administration Loans

The Company provides numerous SBA loan products, primarily through the Bank. Beach Business Bank (which was acquired by the Company in 2012, re-named The Private Bank of California on July 1, 2013 and merged with and into the Bank on October 11, 2013) had approval to access the Preferred Lenders Program (PLP) within the SBA. After the October 11, 2013 subsidiary bank merger, the Bank received PLP status within the SBA effective as of February 3, 2014. The Bank’s PLP status generally gives it the authority to make the final credit decision and have most servicing and liquidation authority.

The Company provides the following SBA products:

•

7(a)—These loans provide the Bank with a guarantee from the SBA of the United States Government for up to 85 percent of the loan amount for loans up to $150,000 and 75 percent of the loan amount for loans of more than $150,000, with a maximum loan amount of $5 million. These are term loans that can be used for a variety of purposes including expansion, renovation, new construction, and equipment purchases. Depending on collateral, these loans can have terms ranging from 7 to 25 years. The guaranteed portion of these loans is often sold into the secondary market.

•

Cap Lines—In general, also guaranteed up to 75 percent and typically used for working capital purposes, secured by accounts receivable and/or inventory. These lines are generally allowed for up to $5 million and can be issued with maturities of up to 5 years.

•

504 Loans—These are real estate loans in which the lender can advance up to 90 percent of the purchase price; retain 50 percent as a first trust deed; and, have a Certified Development Company (CDC) retain the 2nd position for 40 percent of the total cost. CDC’s are licensed by the SBA. Required equity of the borrower is 10 percent. Terms of the first trust deed are typically similar to market rates for conventional real estate loans, while the CDC establishes rates and terms for the second trust deed loan.

•

SBA Express—These loans offer a 50 percent guaranty by the SBA and are up to a maximum of $350,000 (although the SBA temporarily increased the maximum limit to $1 million on October 8, 2010 for a period of one year). These loans are typically revolving lines and have maturities of up to 7 years.

SBA lending is subject to federal legislation that can affect the availability and funding of the program. This dependence on legislative funding might cause future limitations and uncertainties with regard to the continued funding of such programs, which could potentially have an adverse financial impact on our business.

The Company’s portfolio of SBA loans is subject to certain risks, including, but not limited to: (i) the effects of economic downturns on the Southern California economy; (ii) interest rate increases; (iii) deterioration of the value of the underlying collateral; and, (iv) deterioration of a borrower’s or guarantors financial capabilities. We attempt to reduce the exposure of these risks through: (a) reviewing each loan request and renewal individually; (b) adhering to written loan policies; (c) adhering to SBA policies and regulations; (e) obtaining independent third party appraisals; and (f) obtaining external independent credit reviews. SBA loans normally require monthly installment payments of principal and interest and therefore are continually monitored for past due conditions. In general, the Company receives and reviews financial statements and other documents of borrowing customers on an ongoing basis during the term of the relationship and responds to any deterioration identified.

At December 31, 2013, SBA loans totaled $27.4 million or 1.1 percent of total gross loans compared to $36.1 million or 2.9 percent of total gross loans at December 31, 2012.

Construction Lending

Our construction lending primarily relates to one-to-four family residential properties. The Company may in the future originate or purchase loans or participations in construction and rehabilitation loans on residential, multi-family and/or commercial real estate properties. The Company had $24.9 million in construction loans at December 31, 2013, or 1.0 percent of total gross loans compared to $6.6 million or 0.5 percent of total gross loans at December 31, 2012. The increase was due mainly to the acquisition of $16.7 million construction loans in the PBOC acquisition.

Lease Financing

Commercial equipment leasing and financing was introduced as a product in the third quarter of 2012 to meet the needs of small and medium sized businesses for growth through investments in commercial equipment. The Company provides full payout capital leases and equipment finance agreements for essential use equipment to small and medium sized business nationally. The terms are 1 to 7 years in length and generally provide more flexibility to meet the equipment obsolescence needs of small and medium sized businesses than traditional business loans.

Commercial equipment leases are secured by the business assets being financed. The Company also obtains a commercial guaranty of the business and generally a personal guaranty of the owner(s) of the business. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had $31.9 million in commercial equipment leases outstanding, or 1.3 percent of total loans and leases, an increase of $20.7 million, or 185.2 percent, from $11.2 million, or 0.9 percent of total loans and leases at December 31, 2012.

Real Estate 1-4 Family First Mortgages Loans

The Company originates loans secured by first mortgages on one-to-four family residences throughout California and the United States.

The Company offers a variety of loan products catering to the specific needs of borrowers, including fixed rate and adjustable rate mortgages with either 30-year or 15-year terms. The Company offers conventional mortgages eligible for sale to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, government insured Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and Veteran Affairs (VA) mortgages, and jumbo loans where the loan amount exceeds Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac limits.

The Company’s residential lending activity includes both a direct-to-consumer retail residential lending business and a wholesale and correspondent mortgage business. In the retail business, Company loan officers are located either in our call center in Irvine, Bank branches in San Diego, Orange, and Los Angeles Counties, or loan production offices throughout California and in Arizona, Oregon, Montana, Virginia and Washington, and originate mortgage loans directly to consumers. The wholesale mortgage business originates residential mortgage loans submitted to the Company by outside mortgage brokers for underwriting and funding. The correspondent mortgage business acquires residential mortgage loans originated by outside mortgage bankers. The Company does not originate loans defined as high cost by state or federal regulators.

The Company also purchases closed residential mortgage loans from other banks or mortgage bankers through its correspondent subsidiary. Purchased loans are underwritten by the Bank prior to purchase and contain representations and warranties from the seller concerning the accuracy of the credit file and compliance with regulations.

A majority of residential mortgage loans originated by the Company are made to finance the purchase or the refinance of existing loans on owner-occupied homes with a smaller percentage used to finance non-owner occupied homes. A majority of the Company’s loan originations for the held for investment portfolio are collateralized by real properties located in Southern California; however the Bank originates loans held for sale collateralized by real properties located throughout the United States.

The Company generally underwrites one-to-four family residential mortgage loans based on the applicant’s income and credit history and the appraised value of the subject property. Generally, the Company requires private mortgage insurance for conventional loans with a loan to value greater than 80 percent of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price, and FHA insurance or a VA guaranty for government loans. Properties securing our one-to-four family residential mortgage loans are appraised by independent fee appraisers approved by management. The Company requires borrowers to obtain title insurance, hazard insurance, and flood insurance, if necessary.

The Company currently originates one-to-four family residential mortgage loans on either a fixed- or an adjustable-rate basis, as consumer demand and the Bank’s risk management dictates. The Company’s pricing strategy for mortgage loans includes setting interest rates that are competitive with other local financial institutions and mortgage originators.

Adjustable-rate mortgages (ARM) loans are offered with flexible initial and periodic repricing dates, ranging from one year to seven years through the life of the loan. The Company uses a variety of indices to reprice ARM loans. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company originated $792.5 million of one-to-four family residential ARM loans with terms up to 30 years.

The Company sells a majority of the mortgage loans it originates to various investors in the secondary market and may not service these loans after sale of the loans. However, a percentage of adjustable rate mortgage loans are held for investment, and the Company services these loans. Loans sold to investors are subject to certain indemnification provisions, including the repurchase of loans sold and the repayment of sales proceeds to investors under certain conditions. In addition, if a customer defaults on a mortgage payment within the first few payments after the loan is sold, the Company may be required to repurchase the loan at the full amount paid by the purchaser.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, one-to-four family first mortgages totaled $1.29 billion, or 52.6 percent and $638.7 million, or 51.2 percent, respectively, of the total gross loans. The increase was mainly due to the Company’s originations and purchases of five seasoned SFR loan pools in 2013.

HELOCs, Home Equity Loans and Other Consumer Credit

The Company offers a variety of secured consumer loans, including second trust deed home equity loans and home equity lines of credit and loans secured by savings deposits. The Company also offers a limited amount of unsecured loans. The Company originates consumer and other real estate loans primarily in its market area. Consumer loans generally have shorter terms to maturity or variable interest rates, which reduce our exposure to changes in interest rates, and carry higher rates of interest than do conventional one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. Management believes that offering consumer loan products helps to expand and create stronger ties to the Company’s existing customer base by increasing the number of customer relationships and providing cross-marketing opportunities.

The Company’s second deed of trust home equity lines of credit and other consumer loans totaled $116.0 million, and comprised 4.7 percent of the total gross loans at December 31, 2013. Other home equity lines of credit have a seven or ten year draw period and require the payment of 1.0 percent or 1.5 percent of the outstanding loan balance per month (depending on the terms) during the draw period. Following receipt of payments, the available credit includes amounts repaid up to the credit limit. Home equity lines of credit with a 10 year draw period have a balloon payment due at the end of the draw period. For loans with shorter term draw periods, once the draw period has lapsed, generally the payment is fixed based on the loan balance and prevailing market interest rates at that time.

The Company proactively monitors changes in the market value of all home loans contained in its portfolio. The Company’s credit risk management policy requires the purchase of independent, third party valuations of every property in its residential loan portfolio twice during the year. The most recent valuations were as of

November 30, 2013. The Company has the right to adjust, and has adjusted, existing lines of credit to address current market conditions subject to the terms of the loan agreement and covenants. At December 31, 2013, unfunded commitments totaled $46.1 million on other consumer lines of credit. Other consumer loan terms vary according to the type of collateral, length of contract and creditworthiness of the borrower.

Off-Balance Sheet Commitments

As part of service to the Bank’s customers, the Bank from time to time issues formal commitments and lines of credit. These commitments can be either secured or unsecured. They may be in the form of revolving lines of credit for seasonal working capital needs or may take the form of commercial letters of credit or standby letters of credit. Commercial letters of credit facilitate import trade. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.

Private Banking

The Bank offers loans, deposits, and a full range of other banking services to high net worth individuals and entrepreneurs including its full suite of credit products discussed above. Private banking loans include working capital lines of credit to balance the borrower’s business cash flow cycle, loans to finance capital investments or equipment, commercial or residential real estate loans, or unsecured personal loans, customized to fit the needs of the individual or business borrower, based upon the relationship with the customer and the net worth of the customer.

Acquisitions of Seasoned SFR Loan Pools

The acquisition program implemented and executed by the Company initially in 2012 and enhanced in 2013 with the acquisition of Palisades involved a multifaceted due diligence process that included compliance reviews, title analyses, review of modification agreements, updated property valuation assessments, collateral inventory and other undertakings related to the scope of due diligence. Prior to acquiring mortgage loans, the Company, its affiliates, sub-advisors or due diligence partners typically will review the loan portfolio and conduct certain due diligence on a loan by loan basis according to its proprietary diligence plan. This due diligence encompasses analyzing the title, subordinate liens and judgments as well as a comprehensive reconciliation of current property value. The Company, its affiliates, and its sub-advisors prepare a customized version of its diligence plan for each mortgage loan pool being reviewed that is designed to address certain identified pool specific risks. The diligence plan generally reviews several factors, including but not limited to, obtaining and reconciling property value, reviewing chain of titles, reviewing assignments, confirming lien position, reviewing regulatory compliance, updating borrower credit, certifying collateral, and reviewing servicing notes. In certain transactions, a portion of the diligence may be provided by the seller. In those instances, the Company reviews the mortgage loan portfolio to confirm the accuracy of the provided diligence information and supplements as appropriate.

As part of the confirmation of property values in the diligence process, the Company conducts independent due diligence on the individual properties and borrowers prior to the acquisition of the mortgage loans. In addition, market conditions, regional mortgage loan information and local trends in home values, coupled with market knowledge, are used by the Company in calculating the appropriate additional risk discount to compensate for potential property declines, foreclosures, defaults or other risks associated with the mortgage loan portfolio to be acquired. Typically, the Company may enter into one or more agreements with affiliates or third parties to perform certain of these due diligence tasks with respect to acquiring potential mortgage loans.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company completed five seasoned SFR mortgage loan pool acquisitions with unpaid principal balances and fair values of $1.02 billion and $849.9 million at their respective acquisition dates. These loan pools generally consist of seasoned re-performing residential mortgage loans whose characteristics and payment history were consistent with borrowers that demonstrated a willingness and ability to remain in the residence pursuant to the current terms of the mortgage loan agreement. The Company was able to acquire these loans at a

significant discount to both current property value at acquisition and note balance. At December 31, 2013, the unpaid principal balance and carrying value of these loans were $814.0 million and $711.1 million, respectively. The Company determined that certain loans in these seasoned SFR mortgage loan acquisitions reflect credit quality deterioration since origination and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected. The unpaid principal balances and fair values of these loans at the respective dates of acquisition were $473.9 million and $342.1 million, respectively. At December 31, 2013, the unpaid principal balance and carrying value of these loans were $326.0 million and $261.3 million, respectively. At December 31, 2013, approximately 5.63 percent of unpaid principal balance of these loans were delinquent 60 or more days and 1.37 percent were in bankruptcy or foreclosure.

For each acquisition the Company was able to utilize its background in mortgage credit analysis to re-underwrite the borrower’s credit to arrive at what it believes to be an attractive risk adjusted return for a highly collateralized investment in performing mortgage loans. In aggregate, the purchase price of the loans was less than 62 percent of current property value at the time of acquisition based on a third party broker price opinion, and less than 83 percent of note balance at the time of acquisition. At the time of acquisition, approximately 86 percent of the mortgage loans by current principal balance (excluding any forbearance amounts) had the original terms modified at some point since origination by a prior owner or servicer. The mortgage loans had a current weighted average interest rate of 4.39 percent, determined by current principal balance. The weighted average credit score of the borrowers comprising the mortgage loans at or near the time of acquisition determined by current principal balance and excluding those with no credit score on file was 655. The average property value determined by a broker price opinion by third party licensed real estate professionals at or around the time of acquisition was $292 thousand. Approximately 89.6 percent of the borrowers by current principal balance had made at least 12 monthly payments in the 12 months preceding the trade date (or, in some cases calculated as making 11 monthly payments in the 11 months preceding the trade date), and 94 percent had made nine monthly payments in the nine months preceding the trade date. The mortgage loans are secured by residences located in all 50 states and Washington DC, with California being the largest state concentration representing 36.3 percent of the note balance, and with no other state concentration exceeding 10.0 percent based upon the current note balance.

During the course of 2012, the Company completed three seasoned SFR loan acquisitions with unpaid principal balances and fair values of $114.8 million and $66.7 million at the respective acquisition dates. These loan pools generally consist of seasoned re-performing residential mortgage loans whose characteristics and payment history were consistent with borrowers that demonstrated a willingness and ability to remain in the residence pursuant to the current terms of the mortgage loan agreement. In aggregate, the purchase price of the loans was less than 70 percent of current property value at the time of acquisition based on a third party broker price opinion, and less than 60 percent of note balance at the time of acquisition. The mortgage loans had a current weighted average interest rate of 4.13 percent, determined by current unpaid principal balance. The weighted average credit score of the borrowers comprising the mortgage loans at or near the time of acquisition determined by current principal balance and excluding those with no credit score on file was 632. The average property value determined by a broker price opinion obtained by third party licensed real estate professionals at or around the time of acquisition was $252 thousand. As of December 31, 2013, the unpaid principal balance and carrying value of these loans were $88.0 million and $53.2 million, respectively.

As part of the acquisition program, the Company may sell from time to time seasoned SFR mortgage loans that do not meet the Company’s investment standards. During 2013, the Company sold seasoned SFR mortgage loans with an unpaid principal balance of $176.6 million and a carrying value of $113.0 million.

Non-Traditional Mortgage Loans

The Company’s non-traditional mortgage portfolio (NTM) is comprised of three interest only products: the Green Account Loans (Green Loans), the hybrid interest only adjustable rate mortgage (ARM) and a small number of negatively amortizing ARM loans. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the non-traditional mortgages totaled $309.6 million or 12.7 percent and $368.3 million or 29.5 percent of the total gross loan portfolio, respectively, which is a decrease of $58.7 million or 15.9 percent.

The initial credit guidelines for the non-traditional mortgage portfolio were established based on borrower Fair Isaac Company (FICO) score, loan-to-value, property type, occupancy type, loan amount, and geography. Additionally from an ongoing credit risk management perspective, the Company has assessed that the most significant performance indicators for NTMs to be loan-to-value and FICO scores. On a semi-annual basis, the Company performs loan reviews of the NTM loan portfolio that includes refreshing FICO scores on the Green Loans and HELOCs and ordering third party automated valuation models (AVM) to confirm collateral value.

Green Account Loans

Green Loans are single family residential first mortgage lines of credit with a linked checking account that allows all types of deposits and withdrawals to be performed. The loans are generally interest only with a 15 year balloon payment due at maturity. Transactions posted to the checking account are cleared on a daily basis against the loan, effectively bringing the checking account balance to zero on a daily basis. If the outstanding balance of the loan is paid down to a zero balance, excess funds remain in the linked checking account. Subsequent debit activity will use these funds before the line of credit is accessed. Although we ceased originating Green Loan accounts in 2011, existing Green Loan borrowers who continue to meet the Green Loan credit and property value requirements are entitled to continue to draw on their Green Loans, and at December 31, 2013 the balance of Green Loans in our portfolio was $153.0 million, a decrease of $53.4 million from $206.4 million at December 31, 2012.

The finance charge is calculated based on the current interest rate and daily outstanding principal balance. On the payment due date, depending on availability on the line of credit, the payment may be paid by an advance to the loan resulting in the borrower not making a payment. Borrowers who choose to make a payment do so by making a deposit into the linked checking account that is applied to the loan in a daily sweep.

The Green Loans are similar to HELOCs in that they are collateralized primarily by the equity in single family residential mortgage loans. However, some Green Loans are subject to differences from HELOCs relating to certain characteristics including one-action laws. Similar to Green Loans, HELOCs allow the borrower to draw down on the credit line based on an established loan amount for a period of time, typically 10 years, requiring an interest only payment with an option to pay principal at any time. A typical HELOC provides that at the end of the term the borrower can continue to make monthly principal and interest payments based loan balance until the maturity date. The Green Loan is an interest only loan with a maturity of 15 years at which time the loan comes due and payable with a balloon payment due at maturity. The unique payment structure also differs from a traditional HELOC in that payments are made through the direct linkage of a personal checking account to the loan through a nightly sweep of funds into the Green Loan account. This reduces any outstanding balance on the loan by the total amount deposited into the checking account. As a result, every time a deposit is made, effectively a payment to the Green Loan is made. HELOCs typically do not cause the loan to be paid down by a borrowers depositing of funds into their checking account at the same bank.

Credit guidelines for Green Loans were established based on borrower Fair Isaac Company (FICO) scores, property type, occupancy type, loan amount, and geography. Property types include single family residences and second trust deeds where the Company owned the first liens, owner occupied as well as non-owner occupied properties. The Company utilized its underwriting guidelines for first liens to underwrite the Green Loan secured by second trust deeds as if the combined loans were a single Green Loan.

For single family properties, the loan sizes ranged up to $7.0 million and $650 thousand for owner occupied and non-owner occupied, respectively. For two-to-four family properties, the loan sizes ranged up to $1.1 million. As loan size increased, the maximum LTV decreases from 80 percent to 60 percent. Maximum LTVs were adjusted by 5-10 percent for specified property types such as condos. FICOs were based on the primary wage earners’ mid FICO score and the lower of two mid FICO scores for full and alternative documentation, respectively. Seventy-six percent of the FICO scores exceeded 700 at the time of origination. Loans greater than $1 million were subject to a second appraisal or third party appraisal review at origination.

Interest Only Mortgage Loans

Interest-only mortgage loans are primarily single family residential first mortgage loans with payment features that allow interest-only payments during the first one, three, or five years during which time the interest rate is fixed before converting to fully amortizing payments. Following the expiration of the fixed interest rate, the interest rate and payment begins to adjust on an annual basis, with fully amortizing payments that include principal and interest calculated over the remaining term of the loan. The loan can be secured by owner or non-owner occupied properties that include single family units and second homes. As of December 31, 2013, our interest only loans decreased by $2.6 million, or 1.8 percent, to $140.0 million from $142.5 million at December 31, 2012.

Loans with the Potential for Negative Amortization

Negative amortization loans decreased by $2.7 million, or 14.1 percent, to $16.6 million as of December 31, 2013 from $19.3 million as of December 31, 2012. The Company discontinued origination of negative amortization loans in 2007. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, $1.2 million and none, respectively, of the loans that had the potential for negative amortization were non-performing. These loans pose a potentially higher credit risk because of the lack of principal amortization and potential for negative amortization; however, management believes the risk is mitigated through the loan terms and underwriting standards, including the Company’s policies on loan-to-value ratios.

Loan and Lease Servicing

During 2013, single family residential mortgage loans held in the portfolio were serviced in house, pursuant to secondary market guidelines. In 2014, the Bank contracted with a nationally known sub-servicer to service these loans. Generally, when a borrower fails to make a payment on a mortgage loan, a late charge notice is mailed approximately 16 days after the due date. All delinquent accounts are reviewed by a collector, who attempts to cure the delinquency by contacting the borrower prior to the loan becoming 30 days past due. If the loan becomes 60 days delinquent, the collector will generally contact the borrower by phone, send a personal letter and/or engage a field service company to visit the property in order to identify the reason for the delinquency. Once the loan becomes 90 days delinquent, contact with the borrower is made requesting payment of the delinquent amount in full, or the establishment of an acceptable repayment plan to bring the loan current. When a loan becomes 90 days delinquent, a drive-by inspection is made and if an acceptable repayment plan has not been agreed upon, a collection officer will generally initiate foreclosure or refer the account to the Company’s counsel to initiate foreclosure proceedings.

For SBA, construction, lease financing and consumer loans a similar process is followed, with the initial written contact being made once the loan is 10 days past due with a follow-up notice at 16 days past due. Follow-up contacts are generally on an accelerated basis compared to the SFR mortgage loan procedure.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

The allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) represents management’s best estimate of the probable losses inherent in the existing loan and lease portfolio. The ALLL is increased by the provision for loan losses charged to expense and reduced by loan and lease charge-offs, net of recoveries.

Management evaluates the Company’s ALLL on a quarterly basis, or more often if needed. Management believes the ALLL is a “critical accounting estimation” because it is based upon the assessment of various quantitative and qualitative factors affecting the collectability of loans and lease, including current economic conditions, past credit experience, delinquency status, the value of the underlying collateral, if any, and a continuing review of the portfolio of loans and leases.

The Company’s ALLL is based on a number of quantitative and qualitative factors, including levels and trends of past due and non-accrual loans and leases, TDR, asset classifications, loan and lease credit risk grades,

changes in the volume and mix of loans and leases, collateral value, historical loss experience, peer group loss experience, size and complexity of individual credits, and economic conditions. Provisions for loan and lease losses are provided on both a specific and general basis.

The Company incorporates statistics provided by the FDIC regarding loss percentages experience by banks in the western United States, as well as an internal three-year loss history, to establish potential risk based on the type of collateral, if any, securing each loan and lease. As an additional comparison, data from local banks with the Company’s peer group is reviewed to determine the nature and scope of their losses to date. These reviews provide an understanding of the geographic and size trends in the local banking community.

Specifically, our allowance methodology contains three key elements: (i) amounts based on specific evaluations of impaired loans and leases; (ii) amounts of estimated losses by loans and leases segmentation and by risk rating; and (iii) amounts for qualitative factors, including environmental and general economic factors that indicate probable losses were incurred but were not captured through the other elements of our ALLL process. In addition, for loans and leases measured at fair value on the acquisition date, and deemed to be non-impaired, our allowance methodology captures deterioration in credit quality and other inherent risks of such acquired assets experienced after the purchase date.

Impaired loans and leases are identified at each reporting date based on certain criteria and the majority of which are individually reviewed for impairment. Nonaccrual loans and leases and all performing restructured loans are reviewed individually for the amount of impairment, if any. A loan or lease is considered impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the agreement. We measure impairment of a loan based upon the fair value of the loan’s collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent, or the present value of cash flows, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, if the loan is not collateral-dependent. We measure impairment of a lease based upon the present value of the scheduled lease and residual cash flows, discounted at the lease’s effective interest rate. Increased charge-offs or additions to specific reserves generally result in increased provisions for credit losses.

Our loan and lease portfolio, excluding impaired loans and leases that are evaluated individually, is evaluated by segmentation. The segmentations we currently evaluate are:

•

Commercial and industrial

•

Commercial real estate

•

Construction

•

SBA

•

Leases

•

Single family residence — 1st trust deeds

•

Single family residence — 2nd trust deeds

•

Other consumer

Within these loan segments, we then evaluate loans and leases not adversely classified, which we refer to as “pass” credits, separately from adversely classified loans and leases. The adversely classified loans and leases are further grouped into three credit risk rating categories: “special mention,” “substandard,” and “doubtful.” See “—Asset Quality—Risk Ratings” in Item 7.

In addition, we may refer to the loans and leases classified as “substandard” and “doubtful” together as “classified” loans and leases.

The allowance amounts for “pass” rated loans and leases and those loans and leases adversely classified, which are not reviewed individually, are determined using historical loss rates. The historical loss rates are updated quarterly based on historical losses.

Finally, in order to ensure our allowance methodology is incorporating recent trends and economic conditions, we perform a qualitative analysis, including the consideration of environmental and general economic factors to our ALLL methodology including: (i) credit concentrations; (ii) delinquency trends; (iii) economic and business conditions; (iv) the quality of lending management and staff; (v) lending policies and procedures; (vi) loss and recovery trends; (vii) nature and volume of the portfolio; (viii) nonaccrual and problem loan trends; (ix) usage trends of unfunded commitments; (x) and other adjustments for items not covered by other factors.

Management periodically reviews the quantitative and qualitative loss factors utilized in its analysis of the specific and general ALLL in an effort to incorporate the current status of the factors described above.

Although management believes the level of the ALLL as of December 31, 2013 was adequate to absorb probable losses in the portfolio, declines in economies of the Company’s primary markets or other factors could result in losses that cannot be reasonably predicted at this time.

Although we have established an ALLL that we consider appropriate, there can be no assurance that the established ALLL will be sufficient to offset losses on loans and leases in the future. Management also believes that the reserve for unfunded loan commitments is appropriate. In making this determination, we use the same methodology for the reserve for unfunded loan commitments as we do for the allowance for loan and lease losses and consider the same quantitative and qualitative factors, as well as an estimate of the probability of advances of the commitments correlated to their credit risk rating.

At December 31, 2013, our total ALLL was $18.8 million or 0.77 percent of the total loans and leases, as compared to $14.4 million, or 1.16 percent of the total loans and leases at December 31, 2012. The ALLL that was collectively evaluated for impairment on originated loans and leases at December 31, 2013 was $17.1 million, which represented 1.46 percent of total originated loans and leases, as compared to $13.2 million, or 1.48 percent, of total originated loans and leases at December 31, 2012. Including the non-credit impaired loans acquired through the Beach, Gateway, and PBOC acquisitions, ALLL that was collectively evaluated for impairment was $18.5 million, which represents 1.13 percent of total of such loans and leases, as compared to $13.2 million, or 1.18 percent, or total of such loans and leases. The ALLL that was individually evaluated for impairment was $96 thousand at December 31, 2013 compared to $1.2 million at December 31, 2012. An unallocated ALLL of $450 thousand was held at December 31, 2013. Assessing the allowance for loan and lease losses is inherently subjective as it requires making material estimates, including the amount and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans and leases that may be susceptible to significant change. In the opinion of management, the allowance, when taken as a whole, reflects estimated probable losses presently inherent in our loan and lease portfolios.

Investment Activities

The general objectives of our investment portfolio are to provide liquidity when loan and lease demand is high, to assist in maintaining earnings when loan and lease demand is low and to maximize earnings while satisfactorily managing risk, including credit risk, reinvestment risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk. See Item 7A “—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

The Company currently invests in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) as part of our asset/liability management strategy. Management believes that MBS can represent attractive investment alternatives relative to other investments due to the wide variety of maturity and repayment options available through such investments. In particular, the Company has concluded that short and intermediate duration MBS (with an expected average life of less than ten years) represent a combination of rate and duration that match the Company’s liquidity and risk profile goals. All of the Company’s negotiable securities, including MBS, are held as “available for sale.”

Sources of Funds

General

The Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, payments and maturities of outstanding loans and leases and investment securities, and other short-term investments and funds provided from operations. While scheduled payments from the amortization of loans and leases and mortgage-backed securities and maturing securities and short-term investments are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan and lease prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and competition. In addition, the Company invests excess funds in short-term interest-earning assets, which provide liquidity to meet lending requirements. The Company also generates cash through borrowings. The Company utilizes Federal Home Loan Bank advances to leverage its capital base, to provide funds for its lending activities, as a source of liquidity, and to enhance its interest rate risk management.

Deposits

The Company offers a variety of deposit accounts to both consumers and businesses having a wide range of interest rates and terms. The Company’s deposits consist of savings accounts, money market deposit accounts, interest bearing demand accounts, and certificates of deposit. The Company solicits deposits primarily in our market area and from institutional investors.

During 2012, we introduced the “One Account” and the “Preferred Account,” in order to grow a stable, high quality, core deposit base, and reduce our reliance on brokered deposits, resulting in a lower cost and more stable funding base. Core deposits grew $1.66 billion during 2013 and totaled $2.48 billion at December 31, 2013 and represented 84.9 percent of total deposits. Our One Account is designed to attract and serve individuals who may not need our loan products or otherwise be familiar with our Bank. We believe our service encourages them to build a full relationship with us, including lending relationships. Our Preferred Account serves customers who use the Bank as one of their primary banking relationships. Our relationship managers have successfully learned how to offer full deposit products to their loan clients and build long-term, deep relationships. Our business banking is also a key source of core deposits and, more recently, we have begun to attract core deposits from our private banking clients as well.

The Bank held brokered deposits of $350.0 million at December 31, 2013. The Company primarily relies on competitive pricing policies, marketing and customer service to attract and retain deposits.

The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in money market and prevailing interest rates and competition. The variety of deposit accounts the Company offers has allowed the Company to be competitive in obtaining funds and to respond with flexibility to changes in consumer demand. The Company tries to manage the pricing of our deposits in keeping with our asset/liability management, liquidity and profitability objectives, subject to competitive factors. Based on our experience, the Company believes that our deposits are relatively stable sources of funds. Despite this stability, the Company’s ability to attract and maintain these deposits and the rates paid on them has been and will continue to be significantly affected by market conditions.

Borrowings

Although deposits are our primary source of funds, the Company may utilize borrowings when they are a less costly source of funds and can be invested at a positive interest rate spread, when the Company desires additional capacity to fund loan and lease demand or when they meet our asset/liability management goals. The Company’s borrowings historically have consisted of advances to the Bank from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (FHLB). However, the Bank also has the ability to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Federal Reserve Bank), in additional to Federal Funds borrowings and reverse repurchase agreements.

The Bank may obtain advances from the FHLB by collateralizing the advances with certain of the Bank’s mortgage loans and mortgage-backed and other securities. These advances may be made pursuant to several different credit programs, each of which has its own interest rate, range of maturities and call features. At December 31, 2013, the Bank had $250.0 million in FHLB advances outstanding and the ability to borrow an additional $322.9 million. The Bank also had the ability to borrow $80.8 million from the Federal Reserve Bank as of that date. See also Note 11 of the Notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information regarding FHLB advances. Of the $250.0 million in FHLB borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2013, $235.0 million are expected to mature in 2014 and $15.0 million are expected to mature in 2015.

Competition and Market Area

The Company faces strong competition in originating real estate and other loans and in attracting deposits. Competition in originating real estate loans comes primarily from other commercial banks, savings institutions, credit unions and mortgage bankers. Other commercial banks, savings institutions, credit unions and finance companies provide vigorous competition in consumer lending.

The Company attracts deposits through the retail branch network and through the internet. One of the ways the Company has been able to be competitive in this area is through its retail branch network. A greater understanding for the needs of the client is uncovered through certain sales processes utilized by the branch network. Consequently, the branches have the ability to service those needs with a variety of deposit accounts at competitive rates. Competition for deposits is principally from other commercial banks savings institutions, and credit unions located in the same community, as well as mutual funds and other alternative investments. Effective October 4, 2013, the Company sold eight branches located in Los Angeles, Riverside and San Diego counties. From this transaction, the Company sold all of its deposits in Riverside county and a substantial portion of deposits in San Diego county. Based on the most recent branch deposit data as of June 30, 2013 provided by the FDIC, the share of deposits for the Bank in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Diego counties was as follows:


	As of
	June 30, 2013
Los Angeles County		0.21	%
Orange County		0.59	%
Riverside County		0.67	%
San Diego County		1.10	%

Employees

At December 31, 2013, we had a total of 1,361 full-time employees and 23 part-time employees. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group. Management considers its employee relations to be satisfactory.

Regulation and Supervision

General

The Company and the Bank are extensively regulated under federal laws.

As a financial holding company, the Banc of California, Inc. is subject to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and its primary regulator is the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. As a national bank, the Bank is subject to regulation primarily by the OCC. In addition, the Bank is also subject to backup regulation from the FDIC.

Regulation and supervision by the federal banking agencies are intended primarily for the protection of customers and depositors and the Deposit Insurance Fund administered by the FDIC and not for the benefit of shareholders. Set forth below is a brief description of material information regarding certain laws and regulations that are applicable to Banc of California, Inc. and the Bank. This description, as well as other descriptions of laws and regulations in this 10-K, is not complete and qualified in its entirety by reference to applicable laws and regulations.

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) enacted on July 1, 2010 is the most significant financial legislation since the 1930s.

The Dodd-Frank Act requires that bank holding companies, such as the Company as a bank holding company that has elected to become a financial holding company pursuant to the BHCA, act as a source of financial and managerial strength for their insured depository institution subsidiaries, such as the Bank, particularly when such subsidiaries are in financial distress. The FDIC has the authority to hold a bank liable for losses it incurs in connection with another commonly controlled bank.

The FRB has extensive enforcement authority over the Company and the OCC has extensive enforcement authority over the Bank under federal law. Enforcement authority generally includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease-and-desist or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Other actions or inactions may provide the basis for enforcement action, including misleading or untimely filing of reports. Except under certain circumstances, public disclosure of formal enforcement actions by the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC is required by law.

The Dodd-Frank Act made other significant changes to the regulation of bank holding companies and their subsidiary banks, which includes the regulation of the Company and the Bank, and other significant changes will continue to occur as rules are promulgated under the Dodd-Frank Act. These regulatory changes have had and will continue to have a material effect on the business and results of the Company and the Bank. The Dodd-Frank Act created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), with the authority to promulgate regulations intended to protect consumers with respect to financial products and services, including those provided by the Bank, and to restrict unfair, deceptive or abusive conduct by providers of consumer financial products and services. The CFPB has issued rules under the Dodd-Frank Act affecting the Bank’s residential mortgage lending business, including ability-to-repay and qualified mortgage standards, mortgage servicing standards, loan originator compensation standards, high-cost mortgage requirements, appraisal and escrow standards and requirements for higher-priced mortgages. The activities of the Bank are also subject to regulation under numerous federal laws and state consumer protection statutes.

In addition to the Dodd-Frank Act, other legislative and regulatory proposals affecting banks have been made both domestically and internationally. Among other things, these proposals include significant additional capital and liquidity requirements and limitations on size or types of activity in which banks may engage.

Legislation is introduced from time to time in the United States Congress that may affect our operations. In addition, the regulations governing us may be amended from time to time. Any legislative or regulatory changes in the future, including those resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act, could adversely affect our operations and financial condition.

The Company

The Company became a financial holding company effective January 17, 2014. As a bank holding company that has elected to become a financial holding company pursuant to the BHCA, the Company may engage in activities permitted for bank holding companies and may affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and engage in other activities that are financial in nature or incidental or complementary to activities that are

financial in nature. “Financial in nature” activities include securities underwriting, dealing and market making; sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies; insurance underwriting and agency; and merchant banking. See “—Volcker Rule” below.

The Company is required to register and file reports with, and is subject to regulation and examination by the FRB. The FRB’s approval is required for acquisition of another financial institution or holding company thereof, and, under certain circumstances, for the acquisition of other subsidiaries.

As a bank holding company, is the Company subject to the current regulations of the Federal Reserve Board on capital for a bank holding company, which establish a capital framework based on Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital generally the same as Tier 1 and a Tier 2 capital for the Bank, as described below. For bank holding companies, generally the minimum capital ratios (all on a consolidated basis) consist of a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4 percent, a total risk-based capital ratio of 8 percent and a leverage ratio of 4 percent. On an individual basis, the Federal Reserve Board can impose higher ratios on a bank holding company. To be considered well-capitalized, a bank holding company must have a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6 percent and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10 percent, and must not be subject to a written agreement, order or directive to maintain a specific capital measure. As of December 31, 2013, Banc of California, Inc. was considered well-capitalized, with capital ratios in excess of those required to qualify as such.

The Federal Reserve Board has proposed substantial revisions to the regulations on capital for bank holding companies. See “New Capital Regulations” below.

Under the Federal Reserve Board’s policy statement on the payment of cash dividends, a bank holding company should pay cash dividends only to the extent that its net income for the past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a rate of earnings retention that is consistent with the company’s capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition. A bank holding company must give the Federal Reserve Board prior notice of any purchase or redemption of its equity securities if the consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the consideration for all such purchases or redemptions in the preceding 12 months is equal to 10 percent or more of its consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve Board may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would be an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve Board order, or condition imposed in writing by the Federal Reserve Board. This notification requirement does not apply to a bank holding company that qualifies as well capitalized, received a composite rating and a rating for management of “1” or “2” in its last examination and is not subject to any unresolved supervisory issue.

The Bank

The Bank is subject to a variety of requirements under federal law.

The Bank is required to maintain sufficient liquidity to ensure safe and sound operations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity.”

The OCC has adopted guidelines establishing safety and soundness standards on such matters as loan and lease underwriting and documentation, asset quality, earnings standards, internal controls and audit systems, interest rate risk exposure and compensation and other employee benefits. Any institution which fails to comply with these standards must submit a compliance plan.

The Federal Reserve Board requires all depository institutions to maintain non-interest bearing reserves at specified levels against their transaction accounts, primarily checking, NOW and Super NOW checking accounts. At December 31, 2013, Bank was in compliance with these reserve requirements.

FDIC Insurance

The deposits of the Bank are insured up to the applicable limits by the FDIC, and such insurance is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. The basic deposit insurance limit is generally $250,000 as specified in FDIC regulations. Non-interest bearing transaction accounts received unlimited coverage through December 31, 2013.

As insurer, the FDIC imposes deposit insurance premiums and is authorized to conduct examinations of and to require reporting by FDIC-insured institutions. The Bank’s deposit insurance premiums for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $1.7 million. FDIC-insured institutions are required to pay an additional quarterly assessment called the FICO assessment in order to fund the interest on bonds issued to resolve thrift failures in the 1980’s. This assessment will continue until the bonds mature in the years 2017 through 2019. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Bank paid $131 thousand in FICO assessments.

The FDIC assesses deposit insurance premiums quarterly on each FDIC-insured institution based on annualized rates. Each institution under $10 billion in assets is assigned to one of four risk categories based on its capital, supervisory ratings and other factors, with higher risk institutions paying higher premiums. Its deposit insurance premiums are based on the rates applicable to its risk category, subject to certain adjustments, and as required by the Dodd-Frank Act, are assessed on the amount of an institution’s total assets minus its Tier 1 capital.

Capital Requirements

The Bank is required to maintain specified levels of regulatory capital under the current capital and prompt corrective action regulations of the OCC. To be adequately capitalized, an institution must have a leverage ratio of at least 4.0 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 4.0 percent and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.0 percent. To be a well-capitalized, an institution must have a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5.0 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.0 percent and total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0 percent. Institutions that are not well-capitalized are subject to certain restrictions on brokered deposits and interest rates on deposits.

The term leverage ratio means the ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted total leverage assets. The term Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio means the ratio of Tier 1 capital to total risk-weighted assets. The term total risk-based capital ratio means the ratio of total capital to total risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 capital generally consists of common stockholders’ equity and retained earnings and certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related earnings, excluding most intangible assets. Total capital consists of the sum of an institution’s Tier 1 capital and the amount of its Tier 2 capital up to the amount of its Tier 1 capital. Tier 2 capital consists generally of certain permanent and maturing capital instruments, the amount of the institution’s allowance for loan and lease losses up to 1.25 percent of risk-weighted assets and certain unrealized gains on equity securities. Total adjusted total assets consist of total assets as specified for call report purposes, less such certain items as disallowed servicing assets and accumulated gains/losses on available-for-sale securities. Risk-weighted assets are determined under the capital regulations, which assign to every asset and off-balance sheet item, a risk weight generally ranging from 0 percent to 100 percent based on the inherent risk of the asset. At December 31, 2013, the regulatory capital ratios of the Bank exceeded the ratios required to qualify as well-capitalized. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Capital.”

The OCC has the ability to establish an individual minimum capital requirement for a particular institution, based on its circumstances, which varies from the capital levels that would otherwise be required. The OCC has not imposed any such requirement on the Bank.

The OCC is authorized and, under certain circumstances, required to take certain actions against an institution that is less than adequately capitalized. Such an institution must submit a capital restoration plan, including a specified guarantee by its holding company, and until the plan is approved by the OCC, the institution may not increase its assets, acquire another institution, establish a branch or engage in any new activities, and generally may not make capital distributions.

For institutions that are not at least adequately capitalized, progressively more severe restrictions generally apply as capital ratios decrease, or if the OCC reclassifies an institution into a lower capital category due to unsafe or unsound practices or unsafe or unsound condition. Such restrictions may cover all aspects of operations and may include a forced merger or acquisition. An institution that becomes “critically undercapitalized” because it has a

tangible equity ratio of 2.0 percent or less is generally subject to the appointment of the FDIC as receiver or conservator for the institution within 90 days after it becomes critically undercapitalized. The imposition by the OCC of any of these measures on the Bank may have a substantial adverse effect on its operations and profitability.

The OCC has adopted substantial revisions to the regulations on capital prompt corrective action for FDIC-insured institutions. See “New Capital Regulations” below.

Anti-Money Laundering and Suspicious Activity

Several federal laws, including the Bank Secrecy Act, the Money Laundering Control Act and the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the Patriot Act) require all financial institutions, including banks, to implement policies and procedures relating to anti-money laundering, compliance, suspicious activities, and currency transaction reporting and due diligence on customers. The Patriot Act also requires federal bank regulators to evaluate the effectiveness of an applicant in combating money laundering when determining whether to approve a proposed bank acquisition.

Community Reinvestment Act

The Bank is subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). Under the terms of the CRA, the Bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with safe and sound operation, to help meet the credit needs of its community, including providing credit to individuals residing in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions, and does not limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community in a manner consistent with the CRA.

The OCC regularly assesses the Bank on its record in meeting the credit needs of the community served by that institution, including low-income and moderate-income neighborhoods. The Bank received a satisfactory rating in its most recent CRA evaluation.

The CRA assessment also is considered when the Federal Reserve reviews applications by banking institutions to acquire, merge or consolidate with another banking institution or its holding company, to establish a new branch office that will accept deposits or to relocate an office. In the case of a bank holding company applying for approval to acquire a bank, the Federal Reserve will assess the records of each subsidiary depository institution of the applicant bank holding company, and those records may be the basis for denying the application.

Financial Privacy Under the Requirements of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the GLBA)

The Company and its subsidiaries are required periodically to disclose to their retail customers the Company’s policies and practices with respect to the sharing of nonpublic customer information with its affiliates and others, and the confidentiality and security of that information. Under the GLBA, retail customers also must be given the opportunity to “opt out” of information-sharing arrangements with nonaffiliates, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the GLBA.

Limitations on Transactions with Affiliates and Loans to Insiders

Transactions between either the Bank and any affiliate are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. An affiliate of a bank is any company or entity which controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the bank but which is not a subsidiary of the bank. The Company and its subsidiaries are affiliates of the Bank. Generally, Section 23A limits the extent to which the Bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10.0 percent of the Bank’s capital stock and surplus, and imposes an aggregate limit on all such transactions with all affiliates in an amount equal to 20.0 percent of such capital stock and surplus. Section 23B applies to “covered transactions” as well as certain other transactions and requires that all transactions be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the Bank, as those

provided to a non-affiliate. The term “covered transaction” includes the making of loans to an affiliate, the purchase of or investment in the securities issued by an affiliate, the purchase of assets from an affiliate, the acceptance of securities issued by an affiliate as collateral security for a loan or extension of credit to any person or company, or the issuance of a guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit on behalf of an affiliate. Loans to an affiliate must be collateralized.

In addition, Sections 22(g) and (h) of the Federal Reserve Act place restrictions on loans to executive officers, directors and principal shareholders of the Bank and its affiliates. Under Section 22(h), loans to a director, executive officer or greater than 10.0 percent shareholder of the Bank or its affiliates and certain related interests may generally not exceed, together with all other outstanding loans to such person and related interests, 15.0 percent of the Bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus, plus an additional 10.0 percent of unimpaired capital and surplus for loans that are fully secured by readily marketable collateral having a value at least equal to the amount of the loan. Section 22(h) also requires that loans to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders be made on terms substantially the same as those offered in comparable transactions to other persons, and not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. There is an exception for loans that are made pursuant to a benefit or compensation program that (1) is widely available to employees of the Bank or its affiliate and (2) does not give preference to any director, executive officer or principal shareholder or certain related interests over other employees of the Bank or its affiliate. Section 22(h) also requires prior board approval for certain loans. In addition, the aggregate amount of all loans to all of the executive officers, directors and principal shareholders of the Bank or its affiliates and certain related interests may not exceed 100.0 percent of the institution’s unimpaired capital and surplus. Furthermore, Section 22(g) places additional restrictions on loans to executive officers.

Identity Theft. Under Section 315 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACT Act), the Bank is required to develop and implement a written Identity Theft Prevention Program to detect, prevent and mitigate identity theft “red flags” in connection with the opening of certain accounts or certain existing accounts. Under the FACT Act, the Bank is required to adopt “reasonable policies and procedures” to (i) identify relevant red flags for covered accounts and incorporate those red flags into the program: (ii) detect red flags that have been incorporated into the program; (iii) respond appropriately to any red flags that are detected to prevent and mitigate identity theft; and (iv) ensure the program is updated periodically, to reflect changes in risks to customers or to the safety and soundness of the financial institution or creditor from identity theft.

The Bank maintains a program to meet the requirements of Section 315 of the FACT Act and the Bank believes it is currently in compliance with these requirements.

Consumer Protection Laws and Regulations; Other Regulations

The Bank and its affiliates are subject to a broad array of federal and state consumer protection laws and regulations that govern almost every aspect of its business relationships with consumers including but not limited to the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Secure and Fair Enforcement in Mortgage Licensing Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Service Members’ Civil Relief Act, the Right to Financial Privacy Act, the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act, the Consumer Leasing Act, the Fair Credit Billing Act, the Homeowners Protection Act, the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, laws governing flood insurance, federal and state laws prohibiting unfair and deceptive business practices, foreclosure laws and various regulations that implement some or all of the foregoing. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits, making loans, collecting loans and providing other services. If the Bank fails to comply with these laws and regulations, it may be subject to various penalties.

The Dodd-Frank Act established the CFPB as a new independent bureau within the Federal Reserve System that is responsible for regulating consumer financial products and services under federal consumer financial laws.

The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority with respect to these laws. The Company and the Bank are subject to CFBB’s regulation of consumer financial services and products. The CFPB has issued numerous regulations, and is expected to continue to do so in the next few years. For the Bank and its affiliates, the CFPB’s regulations are enforced by the federal banking regulators. The CFPB’s rulemaking, examination and enforcement authority is expected to significantly affect financial institutions involved in the provision of consumer financial products and services, including the Company and the Bank.

New restrictions on residential mortgages were also promulgated under the Dodd-Frank Act. The provisions include (i) a requirement that lenders make a determination that at the time a residential mortgage loan is consummated the consumer has a reasonable ability to repay the loan and related costs, (ii) a ban on loan originator compensation based on the interest rate or other terms of the loan (other than the amount of the principal), (iii) a ban on prepayment penalties for certain types of loans, (iv) bans on arbitration provisions in mortgage loans and (v) requirements for enhanced disclosures in connection with the making of a loan. The Dodd-Frank Act also imposes a variety of requirements on entities that service mortgage loans.

The OCC must approve the Bank’s acquisition of other financial institutions and certain other acquisitions, and its establishment of branches. Generally, the Bank may branch de novo nationwide, but branching by acquisition may be restricted by applicable state law.

The Bank’s general limit on loans to one borrower is 15 percent of its capital and surplus, plus an additional 10 percent of its capital and surplus if the amount of loans greater than 15 percent of capital and surplus is fully secured by readily marketable collateral. Capital and surplus means Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital plus the amount of allowance for loan and lease losses not included in Tier 2 capital. The Bank has no loans in excess of its loans-to-one borrower limit.

OCC regulations impose various restrictions on the ability of a bank to make capital distributions, which include dividends, stock redemptions or repurchases, and certain other items. Generally, a bank may make capital distributions during any calendar year equal to up to 100 percent of net income for the year-to-date plus retained net income for the two preceding years without prior OCC approval. However, the OCC may restrict dividends by an institution deemed to be in need of more than normal supervision.

The Bank is a member of the FHLB, which makes loans or advances to members. All advances are required to be fully secured by sufficient collateral as determined by the FHLB, and all long-term advances are required to provide funds for residential home financing. The Bank is required to purchase and maintain stock in the FHLB. At December 31, 2013, the Bank had $14.4 million in FHLB stock, which was in compliance with this requirement.

New Capital Requirements

Effective January 1, 2015 (with some changes transitioned into full effectiveness over two to four years), the Company and the Bank will be subject to new capital regulations adopted by the FRB and the OCC, which create a new required ratio for common equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital, increase the minimum leverage and Tier 1 capital ratios, change the risk-weightings of certain assets for purposes of the risk-based capital ratios, create an additional capital conservation buffer over the required capital ratios, and change what qualifies as capital for purposes of meeting the capital requirements.

Under the new capital regulations, the minimum capital ratios are: (1) a CET1 capital ratio of 4.5 percent of risk-weighted assets; (2) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0 percent of risk-weighted assets; (3) a total capital ratio of 8.0 percent of risk-weighted assets; and (4) a leverage ratio (the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average total adjusted assets) of 4.0 percent. CET1 generally consists of common stock; retained earnings; accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) unless we elect to exclude AOCI from regulatory capital, as discussed below; and certain minority interests; all subject to applicable regulatory adjustments and deductions.

There are a number of changes in what constitutes regulatory capital, subject to transition periods. These changes include the phasing-out of certain instruments as qualifying capital. Mortgage servicing and deferred tax assets over designated percentages of CET1 will be deducted from capital. In addition, Tier 1 capital will include AOCI, which includes all unrealized gains and losses on available for sale debt and equity securities. Because of our asset size, we have the one-time option of deciding in the first quarter of 2015 whether to permanently opt-out of the inclusion of unrealized gains and losses on available for sale debt and equity securities in our capital calculations. We are considering whether to elect this option.

The new requirements also include changes in the risk-weighting of assets to better reflect credit risk and other risk exposure. These include a 150 percent risk weight (up from 100 percent ) for certain high volatility commercial real estate acquisition, development and construction loans and for non-residential mortgage loans that are 90 days past due or otherwise in nonaccrual status; a 20 percent (up from 0 percent) credit conversion factor for the unused portion of a commitment with an original maturity of one year or less that is not unconditionally cancellable (currently set at 0 percent ); and a 250 percent risk weight (up from 100 percent) for mortgage servicing and deferred tax assets that are not deducted from capital.

In addition to the minimum CET1, Tier 1 and total capital ratios, the Company and the Bank will have to maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of additional CET1 capital greater than 2.5 percent of risk-weighted assets above the required minimum levels in order to avoid limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses. The new capital conservation buffer requirement is to be phased in beginning on January 1, 2016 when a buffer greater than 0.625 percent of risk-weighted assets will be required, which amount will increase each year until the buffer requirement is fully implemented on January 1, 2019.

The OCC’s prompt corrective action standards change when these new capital regulations become effective. Under the new standards, in order to be considered well-capitalized, the Bank must have a ratio of CET1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 6.5 percent (new), a ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 8 percent (increased from 6 percent), a ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 10 percent (unchanged), and a leverage ratio of 5 percent (unchanged); and in order to be considered adequately capitalized, it must have the minimum capital ratios described above.

Although we continue to evaluate the impact that the new capital rules will have on the Company and the Bank, we anticipate that the Company and the Bank will remain well-capitalized under the new capital rules, and will meet the capital conservation buffer requirement.

Volcker Rule

The federal banking agencies have adopted regulations, effective April 15, 2014, with a conformance period for certain features lasting until July 21, 2015, to implement the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act known as the Volcker Rule. Under the regulations, FDIC-insured depository institutions, their holding companies, subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, banking entities), are generally prohibited, subject to certain exemptions, from proprietary trading of securities and other financial instruments and from acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in a “covered fund.”

Trading in certain government obligations is not prohibited. These include, among others, obligations of or guaranteed by the United States or an agency or government-sponsored entity of the United States, obligations of a State of the United States or a political subdivision thereof, and municipal securities. Proprietary trading generally does not include transactions under repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions and purchases and sales for the purpose of liquidity management if the liquidity management plan meets specified criteria; nor does it generally include transactions undertaken in a fiduciary capacity.

The term “covered fund” can include, in addition to many private equity and hedge funds and other entities, certain collateralized mortgage obligations, collateralized debt obligations and collateralized loan obligations, and other items, but it does not include wholly owned subsidiaries, certain joint ventures, or loan securitizations

generally if the underlying assets are solely loans. The term “ownership interest” includes not only an equity interest or a partnership interest, but also an interest that has the right to participate in selection or removal of a general partner, managing member, director, trustee or investment manager or advisor; to receive a share of income, gains or profits of the fund; to receive underlying fund assets after all other interests have been redeemed; to receive all or a portion of excess spread; or to receive income on a pass-through basis or income determined by reference to the performance of fund assets. In addition, “ownership interest” includes an interest under which amounts payable can be reduced based on losses arising from underlying fund assets.

Activities eligible for exemptions include, among others, certain brokerage, underwriting and marketing activities, and risk-mitigating hedging activities with respect to specific risks and subject to specified conditions.

Future Legislation or Regulation

In light of recent conditions in the United States economy and the financial services industry, the Obama administration, Congress, the regulators and various states continue to focus attention on the financial services industry. Additional proposals that affect the industry have been and will likely continue to be introduced. We cannot predict whether any of these proposals will be enacted or adopted or, if they are, the effect they would have on our business, our operations or our financial condition.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Risk Factors

An investment in our securities is subject to certain risks. These risk factors should be considered by prospective and current investors in our securities when evaluating the disclosures in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition could suffer. In that event, the value of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Risk Relating to Our Business and Operating Environment

Our business strategy includes significant growth plans, and our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to grow or fail to manage our growth effectively.

We have pursued and intend to continue to pursue an organic and acquisition growth strategy for our business. We regularly evaluate potential acquisitions and expansion opportunities. If appropriate opportunities present themselves, we expect to engage in selected acquisitions of financial institutions, branch acquisitions and other business growth initiatives or undertakings. There can be no assurance that we will successfully identify appropriate opportunities, that we will be able to negotiate or finance such activities or that such activities, if undertaken, will be successful.

There are risks associated with our growth strategy. To the extent that we grow through acquisitions, we cannot ensure that we will be able to adequately or profitably manage this growth. Acquiring other banks, branches or other assets, as well as other expansion activities, involves various risks including the risks of incorrectly assessing the credit quality of acquired assets, encountering greater than expected costs of integrating acquired banks or branches, the risk of loss of customers and/or employees of the acquired institution or branch, executing cost savings measures, not achieving revenue enhancements and otherwise not realizing the transaction’s anticipated benefits. Our ability to address these matters successfully cannot be assured. In addition, our strategic efforts may divert resources or management’s attention from ongoing business operations, may require investment in integration and in development and enhancement of additional operational and reporting processes and controls, and may subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny.

Our growth initiatives may also require us to recruit experienced personnel to assist in such initiatives. Accordingly, the failure to identify and retain such personnel would place significant limitations on our ability to successfully execute our growth strategy. In addition, to the extent we expand our lending beyond our current market areas, we could incur additional risks related to those new market areas. We may not be able to expand our market presence in our existing market areas or successfully enter new markets.

If we do not successfully execute our acquisition growth plan, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and growth prospects. In addition, if we were to conclude that the value of an acquired business had decreased and that the related goodwill had been impaired, that conclusion would result in an impairment of goodwill charge to us, which would adversely affect our results of operations. While we believe we will have the executive management resources and internal systems in place to successfully manage our future growth, there can be no assurance growth opportunities will be available or that we will successfully manage our growth.

Our recent acquisitions of PBOC, Palisades and CS Financial may present certain risks to our business and operations.

We completed our acquisitions of PBOC and the Palisades on July 1, 2013 on September 11, 2013, respectively, and our wholly owned subsidiary, the Bank completed the acquisition of CS Financial on

October 31, 2013. Difficulties in capitalizing on the opportunities presented by the PBOC, Palisades and CS Financial acquisitions may prevent us from fully achieving the expected benefits from the acquisitions, or may cause the achievement of such expected benefits to take longer than expected.

Further, the assimilation of PBOC’s customers and markets could result in higher than expected deposit attrition, loss of key employees, disruption of our businesses, or otherwise adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees or achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions. These matters could have an adverse effect on us for an undetermined period. We will likely be subject to similar risks and difficulties in connection with any future acquisitions.

Our financial condition and results of operations are dependent on the economy, particularly in the Bank’s market areas. The current economic conditions in the market areas we serve may continue to impact our earnings adversely and could increase the credit risk of our loan and lease portfolio.

Our primary market area is concentrated in the greater San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles counties. Adverse economic conditions in any of these, market areas can reduce our rate of growth, affect our customers’ ability to repay loans and leases and adversely impact our financial condition and earnings. General economic conditions, including inflation, unemployment and money supply fluctuations, also may affect our profitability adversely. Weak economic conditions and ongoing strains in the financial and housing markets have resulted in higher levels of loan and lease delinquencies, problem assets and foreclosures and a decline in the values of the collateral securing our loans and leases.

A further deterioration in economic conditions in the market areas we serve could result in the following consequences, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations:

•

Demand for our products and services may decline;

•

Loan and lease delinquencies, problem assets and foreclosures may increase;

•

Collateral for our loans and leases may further decline in value; and

•

The amount of our low-cost or non-interest-bearing deposits may decrease.

We cannot accurately predict the effect of the weakness in the national economy on our future operating results.

The national economy in general and the financial services sector in particular continue to face significant challenges. We cannot accurately predict the severity or duration of current economic weaknesses, which have adversely impacted the markets we serve. Any further deterioration in national or local economic conditions would have an adverse effect, which could be material, on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. While it is impossible to predict how long these conditions may exist, the current economic weaknesses could present substantial risks for some time for the banking industry and for us.

Our allowance for loan and lease losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb probable incurred losses in our loan and lease portfolio.

Lending money is a substantial part of our business. Every loan and lease carries a certain risk that it will not be repaid in accordance with its terms or that any underlying collateral will not be sufficient to assure repayment. This risk is affected by, among other things:

•

Cash flow of the borrower and/or the project being financed;

•

In the case of a collateralized loan or lease, the changes and uncertainties as to the future value of the collateral;

•

The credit history of a particular borrower;

•

Changes in economic and industry conditions; and

•

The duration of the loan or lease.

We maintain an allowance for loan and lease losses which we believe is appropriate to provide for probable incurred losses in our loan and lease portfolio. The amount of this allowance is determined by our management through a periodic review and consideration of several factors, including, but not limited to:

•

An ongoing review of the quality, size and diversity of the loan and lease portfolio;

•

Evaluation of non-performing loans and leases;

•

Historical default and loss experience;

•

Historical recovery experience;

•

Existing economic conditions;

•

Risk characteristics of the various classifications of loans and leases; and

•

The amount and quality of collateral, including guarantees, securing the loans and leases.

If our loan and lease losses exceed our allowance for probable incurred loan and lease losses, our business, financial condition and profitability may suffer.

The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for loan and lease losses inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires us to make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan and lease portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans and leases. In determining the amount of the allowance for loan and lease losses, we review our loans and leases and the loss and delinquency experience, and evaluate economic conditions and make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. If our estimates are incorrect, the allowance for loan and lease losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan and lease portfolio, resulting in the need for additions to our allowance through an increase in the provision for loan and lease losses. Continuing deterioration in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans and leases, identification of additional problem loans and leases and other factors, both within and outside of our control, may require an increase in the allowance for loan and lease losses. Our allowance for loan and lease losses was 0.77 percent of gross loans and leases held for investment and 59.42 percent of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2013. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for loan and lease losses and may require an increase in the provision for loan and lease losses or the recognition of further charge-offs, based on judgments different than that of management. If charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance for loan and lease losses, we will need additional provisions to increase the allowance for loan and lease losses. Any increases in the provision for loan and lease losses will result in a decrease in net income and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our business may be adversely affected by credit risk associated with residential property and declining property values.

At December 31, 2013, $1.39 billion, or 56.9 percent of our total gross loan and lease portfolio, was secured by one-to-four family mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit. This type of lending is generally sensitive to regional and local economic conditions that significantly impact the ability of borrowers to meet their loan payment obligations, making loss levels difficult to predict. The decline in residential real estate values as a result of the downturn in the California housing markets has reduced the value of the real estate collateral securing these types of loans and increased the risk that we would incur losses if borrowers default on their loans. Residential loans with high combined loan-to-value ratios generally will be more sensitive to declining property values than those with lower combined loan-to-value ratios and therefore may experience a higher incidence of default and severity of losses. In addition, if the borrowers sell their homes, the borrowers may be unable to repay their loans in full from the sale proceeds. As a result, these loans may experience higher rates of delinquencies, defaults and losses, which will in turn adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our loan portfolio possesses increased risk due to our level of adjustable rate loans.

A substantial majority of our real estate secured loans held are adjustable-rate loans. Any rise in prevailing market interest rates may result in increased payments for borrowers who have adjustable rate mortgage loans, increasing the possibility of defaults that may adversely affect our profitability.

Our underwriting practices may not protect us against losses in our loan portfolio.

We seek to mitigate the risks inherent in our loan portfolio by adhering to specific underwriting practices, including: analyzing a borrower’s credit history, financial statements, tax returns and cash flow projections; valuing collateral based on reports of independent appraisers; and verifying liquid assets. Although we believe that our underwriting criteria are, and historically have been, appropriate for the various kinds of loans we make, we have incurred losses on loans that have met these criteria, and may continue to experience higher than expected losses depending on economic factors and consumer behavior. In addition, our ability to assess the creditworthiness of our customers may be impaired if the models and approaches we use to select, manage, and underwrite our customers become less predictive of future behaviors. Finally, we may have higher credit risk, or experience higher credit losses, to the extent our loans are concentrated by loan type, industry segment, borrower type, or location of the borrower or collateral. Our residential loan portfolio is largely jumbo loans that exceed the loan size limit of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and therefore have a more limited secondary market demand than that of conforming loans. At December 31, 2013, 71.9 percent of our commercial real estate loans and 98.1 percent of our residential mortgages were secured by collateral in Southern California. Deterioration in real estate values and underlying economic conditions in Southern California could result in significantly higher credit losses to our portfolio.

Our non-traditional, interest-only single-family residential loans expose us to increased lending risk.

Many of the residential mortgage loans we have originated for investment consisted of non-traditional single family residential mortgage loans that do not conform to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac underwriting guidelines as a result of characteristics of the borrower or property, the loan terms, loan size or exceptions from agency underwriting guidelines.

In the case of interest-only loans, a borrower’s monthly payment is subject to change when the loan converts to fully-amortizing status. Since the borrower’s monthly payment may increase by a substantial amount even without an increase in prevailing market interest rates, the borrower might not be able to afford the increased monthly payment. In addition, interest-only loans have a large, balloon payment at the end of the loan term, which the borrower may be unable to pay. Negative amortization involves a greater risk to us because credit risk exposure increases when the loan incurs negative amortization and the value of the home serving as collateral for the loan does not increase proportionally. Negative amortization is only permitted up to 110 percent of the original loan to value ratio during the first five years the loan is outstanding, with payments adjusting periodically as provided in the loan documents, potentially resulting in higher payments by the borrower. The adjustment of these loans to higher payment requirements can be a substantial factor in higher loan delinquency levels because the borrowers may not be able to make the higher payments. Also, real estate values may decline, and credit standards may tighten in concert with the higher payment requirement, making it difficult for borrowers to sell their homes or refinance their loans to pay off their mortgage obligations. For these reasons, interest-only loans and negative amortization loans are considered to have an increased risk of delinquency, default and foreclosure than conforming loans and may result in higher levels of realized losses.

Our income property loans, consisting of commercial and multi-family real estate loans, involve higher principal amounts than other loans and repayment of these loans may be dependent on factors outside our control or the control of our borrowers.

We originate commercial and multi-family real estate loans for individuals and businesses for various purposes, which are secured by commercial properties. These loans typically involve higher principal amounts than other types of loans, and repayment is dependent upon income generated, or expected to be generated, by the property securing the loan in amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and debt service, which may be adversely affected by

changes in the economy or local market conditions. For example, if the cash flow from the borrower’s project is reduced as a result of leases not being obtained or renewed, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Commercial and multi-family real estate loans also expose us to greater credit risk than loans secured by residential real estate because the collateral securing these loans typically cannot be sold as easily as residential real estate. In addition, many of our commercial and multi-family real estate loans are not fully amortizing and contain large balloon payments upon maturity. Such balloon payments may require the borrower to either sell or refinance the underlying property in order to make the payment, which may increase the risk of default or non-payment.

If we foreclose on a commercial or multi-family real estate loan, our holding period for the collateral typically is longer than for residential mortgage loans because there are fewer potential purchasers of the collateral. Additionally, commercial and multi-family real estate loans generally have relatively large balances to single borrowers or related groups of borrowers. Accordingly, if we make any errors in judgment in the collectability of our commercial and multi-family real estate loans, any resulting charge-offs may be larger on a per loan basis than those incurred with our residential or consumer loan portfolios. As of December 31, 2013, our commercial and multi-family real estate loans totaled $671.5 million, or 27.5 percent of our total gross loan portfolio.

Our portfolio of Green Loans subjects us to greater risks of loss.

We have a portfolio of Green Account home equity loans which generally have a fifteen year draw period with interest-only payment requirements, and a balloon payment requirement at the end of the draw period. The Green Loans include an associated “clearing account” that allows all types of deposit and withdrawal transactions to be performed by the borrower during the term. We ceased originating new Green Loans in 2011; however, existing Green Loan borrowers are entitled to continue to draw on their Green Loan, and at December 31, 2013, the balance of Green Loans in our portfolio totaled $153.0 million.

In 2011, we implemented an information reporting system which allowed us to capture more detailed information than was previously possible, including transaction level data concerning our Green Loans. Although such transaction level data would have enabled us to more closely monitor trends in the credit quality of our Green Loans, we do not possess the enhanced transaction level data relating to the Green Loans for periods prior to the implementation of those enhanced systems. Although we do not believe that the absence of such historical data itself represents a material impediment to our current mechanisms for monitoring the credit quality of the Green Loans, until we compile sufficient transaction level data going forward we are limited in our ability to use historical information to monitor trends in the portfolio that might assist us in anticipating credit problems. Green Loans expose us to greater credit risk than other residential mortgage loans because they are non- amortizing and contain large balloon payments upon maturity. Although the loans require the borrower to make monthly interest payments, we are also subject to an increased risk of loss in connection with the Green Loans because payments due under the loans can be made by means of additional advances drawn by the borrower, up to the amount of the credit limit, thereby increasing our overall loss exposure due to negative amortization. The balloon payment due on maturity may require the borrower to either sell or refinance the underlying property in order to make the payment, which may increase the risk of default or non-payment. Our ability to take remedial actions in response to these additional risks of loss is limited by the terms and conditions of the Green Loans and our alternatives consist primarily of the ability to curtail additional borrowing when we determine that either the collateral value of the underlying real property or the credit worthiness of the borrower no longer supports the level of credit originally extended. Additionally, many of our Green Loans have larger balances than traditional residential mortgage loans, and accordingly, if the loans go into default either during the draw period or at maturity, any resulting charge-offs may be larger on a per loan basis than those incurred with traditional residential loans.

If our investments in other real estate owned are not properly valued or sufficiently reserved to cover actual losses, or if we are required to increase our valuation reserves, our earnings could be reduced.

We obtain updated valuations in the form of appraisals and broker price opinions when a loan has been foreclosed upon and the property is taken in as other real estate owned (OREO), and at certain other times during the asset’s holding period. Our net book value (NBV) in the loan at the time of foreclosure and thereafter is

compared to the updated market value (fair value) of the foreclosed property less estimated selling costs. A charge-off is recorded for any excess in the asset’s NBV over its fair value. If our valuation process is incorrect, the fair value of our investments in OREO may not be sufficient to recover our NBV in such assets, resulting in the need for additional write-downs. Additional write-downs to our investments in OREO could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Our bank regulators periodically review our OREO and may require us to recognize further write-downs. Any increase in our write-downs, as required by such regulator, may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. As of December 31, 2013, we had no OREO.

Our portfolio of “re-performing” loans subjects us to a greater risk of loss.

We have a portfolio of re-performing residential mortgage loans which we purchased in several large pools at a discount to the outstanding principal balance on the loans. These re-performing loans were discounted because either (i) the borrower was delinquent at the time of the loan purchase or had previously been delinquent and had become current prior to our purchase of the loan, or (ii) because the loan had been modified from its original terms. We purchased the loans because we believe that we can successfully service the loans and have the borrowers consistently meet their obligations under the loan, which will increase the value of the loans. However, re-performing loans expose us to greater credit risk than other residential mortgage loans because they have a higher risk of delinquency, default and foreclosure than other residential mortgage loans and may result in higher levels of realized losses.

Repayment of our commercial and industrial loans is often dependent on the cash flows of the borrower, which may be unpredictable, and the collateral securing these loans may not be sufficient to repay the loan in the event of default.

We make our commercial and industrial loans primarily based on the identified cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. Collateral securing commercial and industrial loans may depreciate over time, be difficult to appraise and fluctuate in value. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect the amounts due from its customers. As of December 31, 2013, our commercial and industrial loans totaled $287.8 million, or 11.8 percent of our total gross loan portfolio.

We rely on communications, information, operating and financial control systems technology from third-party service providers, and we may suffer an interruption in those systems.

We rely heavily on third-party service providers for much of our communications, information, operating and financial control systems technology, including our online banking services and data processing systems. Any failure or interruption, or breaches in security, of these systems could result in failures or interruptions in our customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, servicing and/or loan origination systems and, therefore, could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. Additionally, interruptions in service and security breaches could lead existing customers to terminate their banking relationships with us and could make it more difficult for us to attract new banking customers.

We are exposed to risk of environmental liabilities with respect to real properties which we may acquire.

In recent years, due to the continued weakness of the U.S. economy and, more specifically, the California economy, including higher levels of unemployment than the nationwide average and declines in real estate values, many borrowers have been unable to meet their loan repayment obligations and, as a result, we have had to initiate foreclosure proceedings with respect to and take title to an increased number of real properties that had collateralized their loans. As an owner of such properties, we could become subject to environmental liabilities

and incur substantial costs for any property damage, personal injury, investigation and clean-up that may be required due to any environmental contamination that may be found to exist at any of those properties, even though we did not engage in the activities that led to such contamination. In addition, if we are the owner or former owner of a contaminated site, we may be subject to common law claims by third parties seeking damages for environmental contamination emanating from the site. If we were to become subject to significant environmental liabilities or costs, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be adversely affected.

The expansion of our single family residential mortgage loan originations could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A significant portion of our loan originations business consists of providing purchase money loans to homebuyers and refinancing existing loans. The origination of purchase money mortgage loans is greatly influenced by independent third parties involved in the home buying process such as realtors and builders. As a result, our ability to secure relationships with such independent third parties will affect our ability to grow our purchase money mortgage loan volume and, thus, our loan originations business. Our retail branches and retail call center also originates refinances of existing mortgage loans, which is very sensitive to increases in interest rates, and may decrease significantly if interest rates rise.

Our wholesale originations business operates largely through third party mortgage brokers who are not contractually obligated to do business with us. Further, our competitors also have relationships with our brokers and actively compete with us in our efforts to expand our broker networks. Accordingly, we may not be successful in maintaining our existing relationships or expanding our broker networks.

We have made substantial investments to grow our residential mortgage lending business in recent quarters, including adding experienced mortgage loan officers and administrators and management, leasing additional space at our headquarters, opening additional loan production offices, and investing in technology. Our residential mortgage lending business may not generate sufficient revenues to enable us to recover our substantial investment in our residential mortgage lending business, or may not grow sufficiently to contribute to earnings in relation to our investment. Moreover, we may be unable to sell the mortgage loans we originate into the secondary mortgage market at a profit due to changes in interest rates or a reduction in the demand for mortgage loans in the secondary mortgage market. Accordingly, our investment in and expansion of our residential mortgage lending business could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

An increase in interest rates, change in the programs offered by governmental sponsored entities (GSE) or our ability to qualify for such programs may reduce our mortgage revenues, which would negatively impact our non-interest income.

Our mortgage banking operations provide a significant portion of our non-interest income. We generate mortgage revenues primarily from gains on the sale of single-family residential loans pursuant to programs currently offered by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other investors on a servicing released basis. These entities account for a substantial portion of the secondary market in residential mortgage loans. Any future changes in these programs, our eligibility to participate in such programs, the criteria for loans to be accepted or laws that significantly affect the activity of such entities could, in turn, materially adversely affect our results of operations. Further, in a rising or higher interest rate environment, our originations of mortgage loans may decrease, resulting in fewer loans that are available to be sold to investors. This would result in a decrease in mortgage revenues and a corresponding decrease in non-interest income. In addition, our results of operations are affected by the amount of non-interest expense associated with mortgage banking activities, such as salaries and employee benefits, occupancy, equipment and data processing expense and other operating costs. During periods of reduced loan demand, our results of operations may be adversely affected to the extent that we are unable to reduce expenses commensurate with the decline in loan originations.

Secondary mortgage market conditions could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and earnings.

In addition to being affected by interest rates, the secondary mortgage markets are also subject to investor demand for single-family residential loans and mortgage-backed securities and increased investor yield requirements for those loans and securities. These conditions may fluctuate or even worsen in the future. Our business strategy is to originate conforming conventional and government residential mortgage loans and a portion of our nonconforming jumbo conventional residential mortgage loans for sale in the secondary market. Originating loans for sale enables us to earn revenue from fees and gains on loan sales, while reducing our credit risk on the loans as well as our liquidity requirements. We also can use the loan sale proceeds to generate new loans.

We rely on government sponsored entities- Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae - to purchase residential mortgage loans that meet their conforming loan requirements and on other capital markets investors to purchase a portion of our residential mortgage loans that do not meet those requirements – referred to as “nonconforming” loans. Investor demand for nonconforming loans can be volatile, reducing the demand or pricing for those loans. Reduced demand in the capital markets could cause us to retain more nonconforming loans. In addition, we cannot assure that GSEs will not materially limit their purchases of conforming loans, including because of capital constraints, or change their criteria for conforming loans (e.g., maximum loan amount or borrower eligibility). Each of the GSEs is currently in conservatorship, with its primary regulator, the Federal Housing Agency acting as conservator. We cannot predict if, when or how the conservatorship will end, or any associated changes to the GSEs business structure and operations that could result. In addition, there are various proposals to reform the role of the GSEs in the U.S. housing finance market. The extent and timing of any such regulatory reform regarding the housing finance market and the GSEs, including whether the GSEs will continue to exist in their current form, as well as any effect on the Company’s business and financial results, are uncertain.

As a result, significant changes in the secondary mortgage market or a prolonged period of secondary market illiquidity may reduce our loan production volumes and could have a material adverse impact on our future earnings and financial condition.

Any breach of representations and warranties made by us to our residential mortgage loan purchasers or credit default on our loan sales may require us to repurchase residential mortgage loans we have sold.

We sell a majority of the residential mortgage loans we originate in the secondary market pursuant to agreements that generally require us to repurchase loans in the event of a breach of a representation or warranty made by us to the loan purchaser. Any fraud or misrepresentation during the mortgage loan origination process, whether by us, the borrower, mortgage broker, or other party in the transaction, or, in some cases, upon any early payment default on such mortgage loans, may require us to repurchase such loans.

We believe that, as a result of the increased defaults and foreclosures during the past several years resulting in increased demands for repurchases and indemnifications in the secondary market, many purchasers of residential mortgage loans are particularly aware of the conditions under which originators must indemnify or repurchase loans and would benefit from enforcing any repurchase remedies they may have. We believe that our exposure to repurchases under our representations and warranties includes the current unpaid balance of all loans we have sold, including loans originated and sold by Gateway prior to our acquisition. Gateway previously originated loans that had more flexible underwriting guidelines than our current guidelines, and we believe, a higher risk of loss. From 2004 through the time of our acquisition of Gateway in 2012, Gateway sold an aggregate of $8.0 billion of residential loans. To recognize the potential loan repurchase or indemnification losses from those loans, we have recorded a reserve of $5.4 million as of December 31, 2013. During 2013, we sold an aggregate of $1.86 billion of residential loans. A deterioration in the economy, an increase in interest rates or a decrease in home values could increase customer defaults on residential loans we sold and increase demands for repurchases and indemnification and increase our losses from loan repurchases and

indemnifications. If we are required to indemnify or repurchase loans that we originate and sell that result in losses that exceed our reserve, this could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, any claims asserted against us in the future by one of our loan purchasers may result in liabilities or legal expenses that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Other-than-temporary impairment charges in our investment securities portfolio could result in losses and adversely affect our continuing operations.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s investment securities portfolio consisted of 120 securities, 84 of which were in an unrealized loss position. The majority of unrealized losses are related to the Company’s private label residential mortgage-backed securities and agency residential mortgage-backed securities, as discussed below.

The Company’s private label residential mortgage-backed securities that are in a loss position had a fair value of $6.0 million with unrealized losses of $36 thousand at December 31, 2013. The Company’s agency residential mortgage-backed securities that are in a loss position had a fair value of $115.9 million with unrealized losses of approximately $1.8 million. These residential mortgage-backed securities were rated AA or above at purchase and are not within the scope of ASC 325. The Company monitors to ensure it has adequate credit support and as of December 31, 2013, the Company believes there is no other than temporary impairment (OTTI) and did not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery.

We closely monitor our investment securities for changes in credit risk. The valuation of our investment securities also is influenced by external market and other factors, including implementation of SEC and Financial Accounting Standards Board guidance on fair value accounting. Accordingly, if market conditions deteriorate further and we determine our holdings of other investment securities are OTTI, our future earnings, shareholders’ equity, regulatory capital and continuing operations could be materially adversely affected.

Rising interest rates may hurt our profits.

To be profitable, we have to earn more money in interest that we receive on loans and investments than we pay to our depositors and lenders in interest. If interest rates rise, our net interest income and the value of our assets could be reduced if interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings, increases more quickly than interest received on interest-earning assets, such as loans, other mortgage-related investments and investment securities. This is most likely to occur if short-term interest rates increase at a faster rate than long-term interest rates, which would cause net income to go down. In addition, rising interest rates may hurt our income, because that may reduce the demand for loans and the value of our securities. In a rapidly changing interest rate environment, we may not be able to manage our interest rate risk effectively, which would adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.

We face significant operational risks.

We operate many different financial service functions and rely on the ability of our employees, third-party vendors and systems to process a significant number of transactions. Operational risk is the risk of loss from operations, including fraud by employees or outside persons, employees’ execution of incorrect or unauthorized transactions, data processing and technology errors or hacking and breaches of internal control systems.

Managing reputational risk is important to attracting and maintaining customers, investors and employees.

Threats to our reputation can come from many sources, including adverse sentiment about financial institutions generally, unethical practices, employee misconduct, failure to deliver minimum standards of service or quality, compliance deficiencies and questionable or fraudulent activities of our customers. We have policies

and procedures in place to promote ethical conduct and protect our reputation. However, these policies and procedures may not be fully effective. Negative publicity regarding our business, employees, or customers, with or without merit, may result in the loss of customers, investors and employees, costly litigation, a decline in revenues and increased governmental oversight.

Liquidity risk could impair our ability to fund operations and jeopardize our financial condition.

Liquidity is essential to our business. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities or on terms that are acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry or economy in general. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include a decrease in the level of our business activity as a result of a downturn in the markets in which our loans are concentrated or adverse regulatory action against us. Our ability to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a disruption in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry in light of the recent turmoil faced by banking organizations and the continued deterioration in credit markets.

We may elect or be compelled to seek additional capital in the future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed.

We are required by federal regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. At some point, we may need to raise additional capital to support continued growth, both organically and through acquisitions.

Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, many of which are outside our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you of our ability to raise additional capital if needed or on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability to further expand our operations through organic growth and acquisitions could be materially impaired and our financial condition and liquidity could be materially and adversely affected.

We depend on our key employees.

Our future prospects are and will remain highly dependent on our directors and executive officers. Our success will, to some extent, depend on the continued service of our directors and continued employment of the executive officers. The unexpected loss of the services of any of these individuals could have a detrimental effect on our business. Although we have entered into employment agreements with members of our senior management team, no assurance can be given that these individuals will continue to be employed by us. The loss of any of these individuals could negatively affect our ability to achieve our growth strategy and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We currently hold a significant amount of bank-owned life insurance.

At December 31, 2013, we held $18.9 million of bank-owned life insurance (BOLI) on certain key and former employees and executives, with a cash surrender value of $18.9 million. The eventual repayment of the cash surrender value is subject to the ability of the various insurance companies to pay death benefits or to return the cash surrender value to us if needed for liquidity purposes. We continually monitor the financial strength of the various companies with whom we carry these policies. However, any one of these companies could experience a decline in financial strength, which could impair its ability to pay benefits or return our cash surrender value. If we need to liquidate these policies for liquidity purposes, we would be subject to taxation on the increase in cash surrender value and penalties for early termination, both of which would adversely impact earnings.

If our investment in the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco becomes impaired, our earnings and shareholders’ equity could decrease.

At December 31, 2013, we owned $14.4 million in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock. We are required to own this stock to be a member of and to obtain advances from our FHLB. This stock is not marketable and can only be redeemed by our FHLB. Our FHLB’s financial condition is linked, in part, to the eleven other members of the FHLB System and to accounting rules and asset quality risks that could materially lower their capital, which would cause our FHLB stock to be deemed impaired, resulting in a decrease in our earnings and assets.

Our information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security; we may have fewer resources than many of our competitors to continue to invest in technological improvements.

We rely heavily on communications and information systems to conduct our business. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in our customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan and other systems. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption or security breach of our information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions or security breaches of our information systems could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our clients by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy client demands for convenience, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our clients.

We operate in a highly regulated environment and our operations and income may be affected adversely by changes in laws, rules and regulations governing our operations.

We are subject to extensive regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve Board, the OCC and the FDIC. The Federal Reserve Board regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. Its fiscal and monetary policies determine in a large part our cost of funds for lending and investing and the return that can be earned on those loans and investments, both of which affect our net interest margin. Federal Reserve Board policies can also materially affect the value of financial instruments that we hold, such as debt securities, certain mortgage loans held for sale and mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). Its policies also can affect our borrowers, potentially increasing the risk that they may fail to repay their loans or satisfy their obligations to us. Changes in policies of the Federal Reserve Board are beyond our control and the impact of changes in those policies on our activities and results of operations can be difficult to predict.

The Company and the Bank are heavily regulated. This regulation is to protect depositors, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole. These regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the ability to impose restrictions on a bank’s operations, reclassify assets, determine the adequacy of a bank’s allowance for loan and lease losses and determine the level of deposit insurance premiums assessed.

The federal banking regulatory agencies recently adopted rules to implement a new global regulatory standard on bank capital adequacy referred to as Basel III, as well as to implement new capital requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act. The new rules increase minimum capital ratios, add a new minimum common equity ratio, add a new capital conservation buffer, and would change the risk-weightings of certain assets. The new rules become effective January 1, 2015, with some changes transitioned to full effectiveness over two to four years.

Congress and federal agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, new regulations or legislation or additional deposit insurance premiums could have a material adverse impact on our operations. Because our business is highly regulated, the laws and applicable regulations are subject to frequent change. Any new laws, rules and regulations could make compliance more difficult or expensive or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition or growth prospects. Such changes could subject us to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products we may offer and/or increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things.

The Dodd-Frank Act and supporting regulations could have a material adverse effect on us.

The Dodd-Frank Act provides for, among other things, new restrictions and an expanded framework of regulatory oversight for financial institutions and their holding companies. These changes may result in additional restrictions on investments and other activities. Effective July 21, 2011, financial institutions have been allowed to pay interest on demand deposits, which has increased our interest expense.

Regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act significantly impact our operations, and we expect to continue to face increased regulation. These regulations may affect the manner in which we do business and the products and services that we provide, affect or restrict our ability to compete in our current businesses or our ability to enter into or acquire new businesses, reduce or limit our revenue or impose additional fees, assessments or taxes on us, intensify the regulatory supervision of us and the financial services industry, and adversely affect our business operations. The Dodd-Frank Act, among other things, established a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the CFPB) with broad authority to administer and enforce a new federal regulatory framework of consumer financial regulation. The Dodd-Frank Act enhanced the regulation of mortgage banking and gave authority to the new CFPB to adopt mortgage regulations. New mortgage rules could dramatically alter our residential mortgage business, from application, to underwriting, to closing, and servicing. In addition, many of the other provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act have extended implementation periods and require extensive additional rulemaking, guidance and interpretation by various regulatory agencies. We expect that the Dodd-Frank Act, including current and future rules implementing its provisions and the interpretations of those rules, will reduce our revenues, increase our expenses, require us to change certain of our business practices, increase the regulatory supervision of us, increase our capital requirements and impose additional assessments and costs on us, and otherwise adversely affect our business.

Increases in deposit insurance premiums and special FDIC assessments will negatively impact our earnings.

We may pay higher FDIC premiums in the future. The Dodd-Frank Act increased the minimum FDIC deposit insurance reserve ratio from 1.15 percent to 1.35 percent. The FDIC has adopted a plan under which it will meet this ratio by the statutory deadline of December 31, 2020. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the FDIC to offset the effect of the increase in the minimum reserve ratio on institutions with assets less than $10.0 billion. The FDIC has not announced how it will implement this offset. In addition to the minimum reserve ratio, the FDIC must set a designated reserve ratio. The FDIC has set a designated reserve ratio of 2.0, which exceeds the minimum reserve ratio.

As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC has adopted final regulations, under which insurance premiums are based on an institution’s total assets minus its Tier 1 capital instead of its deposits. Although our FDIC insurance premiums were initially reduced by these regulations, it is possible that our future insurance premiums will increase.

We rely on dividends from the Bank for substantially all of our revenue.

Our primary source of revenue at the holding company level is earnings of available cash and securities and dividends from the Bank. The OCC regulates and, in some cases, must approve the amounts the Bank pays as dividends to us. If the Bank is unable to pay dividends to us, then we may not be able to service our debt, including our Senior Notes, pay our other obligations or pay dividends on our preferred and common stock which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and the value of your investment in our securities.

The Company has a significant deferred tax asset and may or may not be fully realized.

The Company has a significant deferred tax asset (DTA) and cannot assure that it will be fully realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities computed using enacted tax rates. If we determine that we will not achieve sufficient future taxable income to realize our net deferred tax asset, we are required under generally accepted accounting principles to establish a full or partial valuation allowance. If we determine that a valuation allowance is necessary, we are required to incur a charge to operations. We regularly assess available positive and negative evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that our net deferred tax asset will be realized. Realization of a deferred tax asset requires us to apply significant judgment and is inherently speculative because it requires estimates that cannot be made with certainty. At December 31, 2013, the Company had a net deferred tax asset of none, net of a deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $17.3 million.

Our ability to utilize our DTAs to offset future taxable income may be significantly limited if the Company experiences an “ownership change” under the Internal Revenue Code.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company did not recognize DTAs. The Company’s ability to utilize its DTAs to offset future taxable income may be significantly limited if the Company experiences an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, referred to herein as the Code. In general, an ownership change will occur if there is a cumulative change in the Company’s ownership by “5-percent or more shareholders” (as defined in the Code) that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. If this were to occur, the Company would be subject to an annual limitation on its pre-ownership change DTAs equal to the value of the corporation immediately before the ownership change, provided that the annual limitation would be increased each year to the extent that there is an unused limitation in a prior year.

Changes in accounting standards may affect our performance.

Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. From time to time there are changes in the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements. These changes can be difficult to predict and can materially impact how we report and record our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in a retrospective adjustment to prior financial statements.

Strong competition within our market areas may limit our growth and profitability.

Competition in the banking and financial services industry is intense. In our market areas, we compete with commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, and brokerage and investment banking firms operating locally and elsewhere. Many of these competitors have substantially greater name recognition, resources and lending limits than we do and may offer certain services or prices for services that we do not or cannot provide. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to successfully compete in our markets.

Anti-takeover provisions could negatively impact our shareholders.

Provisions in our charter and bylaws, the corporate law of the State of Maryland and federal regulations could delay, defer or prevent a third party from acquiring us, despite the possible benefit to our shareholders, or otherwise adversely affect the market price of any class of our equity securities. These provisions include: a prohibition on voting shares of common stock beneficially owned in excess of 10 percent of total shares outstanding, supermajority voting requirements for certain business combinations with any person who beneficially owns more than 10 percent of our outstanding common stock; the election of directors to staggered terms of three years; advance notice requirements for nominations for election to our Board of Directors and for proposing matters that stockholders may act on at stockholder meetings, a requirement that only directors may fill a vacancy in our Board of Directors, supermajority voting requirements to remove any of our directors and

the other provisions of our charter. Our charter also authorizes our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock, and preferred stock could be issued as a defensive measure in response to a takeover proposal. In addition, pursuant to federal banking regulations, as a general matter, no person or company, acting individually or in concert with others, may acquire more than 10 percent of our common stock without prior approval from the our federal banking regulator.

These provisions may discourage potential takeover attempts, discourage bids for our common stock at a premium over market price or adversely affect the market price of, and the voting and other rights of the holders of, our common stock. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for holders of our common stock to elect directors other than the candidates nominated by our Board of Directors.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service our debt obligations, including our obligations under the Senior Notes.

Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, including the Senior Notes, will depend on our financial and operating performance, which is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business and other factors beyond our control. We may be unable to maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness, including the Senior Notes.

If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be unable to provide new loans, other products or to fund our obligations to existing customers and otherwise implement our business plans, or to sell assets, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness, including the Senior Notes. As a result, we may be unable to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In the absence of sufficient operating results and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions of assets or to obtain the proceeds that we could realize from them and these proceeds may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due.

Our debt level may harm our financial condition and results of operations.

As of December 31, 2013, we had $250.0 million of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank and $82.3 million in Senior Notes. We also had 82,250 shares of preferred stock outstanding, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, issued and outstanding. Our level of indebtedness could have important consequences to you, because:

•

It could affect our ability to satisfy our financial obligations, including those relating to the senior notes;

•

A portion of our cash flows from operations will have to be dedicated to interest and principal payments and may not be available for operations, working capital, capital expenditures, expansion, acquisitions or general corporate or other purposes;

•

It may impair our ability to obtain additional financing in the future;

•

It may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry; and

•

It may make us more vulnerable to downturns in our business, our industry or the economy in general.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties

As of December 31, 2013, the Company conducts its operations from its main and executive offices at 18500 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1100, Irvine, California, 15 branch offices in Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego counties, and 68 producing mortgage loan production offices in California, Arizona, Oregon, Montana, Virginia and Washington. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company purchased a certain improved real property office complex located at 1588 South Coast Drive, Costa Mesa, California (the Property) at a purchase price of approximately $40.0 million. The Property will be used for the Company’s main office in the future following the completion of certain renovation and construction projects.

See further discussion in Note 6—Premises and Equipment in the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in Item 8 of this report.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time we are involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. We do not anticipate incurring any material liability as a result of such currently pending litigation.

On December 14, 2011, CMG Financial Services, Inc. (CMG) initiated a patent lawsuit against Pacific Trust Bank in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (styled CMG Financial Services, Inc. v. Pacific Trust Bank, F.S.B., et al., Case No. 2:11-cv-10344-PSG-MRW) (the Action) alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,627,509 (the 509 Patent) of limited number of financial products previously offered by Pacific Trust Bank. The 509 Patent relates to the origination and servicing of loans with characteristics similar to the Bank’s Green Loans. On December 16, 2013, the court stayed the Action in its entirety, and administratively closed the case, pending a decision by the Supreme Court in CLS Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp. The Company and its counsel believe the asserted claim is without merit and the resolution of the matter is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations, though no assurance can be given in this regard.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company’s voting common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol “BANC.” The Company’s Class B Non-Voting Common Stock is not listed or traded on any national securities exchange or automated quotation system, and there currently is no established trading market for such stock. The approximate number of holders of record of the Company’s voting common stock as of December 31, 2013 was 1,276. Certain shares are held in “nominee” or “street” name and accordingly, the number of beneficial owners of such shares is not known or included in the foregoing number. There was one holder of record of the Company’s Class B Non-Voting Common Stock as of December 31, 2013. At December 31, 2013 there were 20,959,286 shares and 19,561,469 shares of voting common stock issued and outstanding, respectively, and 584,674 shares of Class B non-voting common stock issued and outstanding. The following table presents quarterly market information for the Company’s voting common stock for the two years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

The following table presents quarterly information for the Company’s voting common stock for the two years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.


	Market Price Range
	High		Low		Dividends
Year ended December 31, 2013
Quarter ended December 31, 2013	$	14.57	$	12.45	$	0.12
Quarter ended September 30, 2013	$	15.54	$	13.24	$	0.12
Quarter ended June 30, 2013	$	13.86	$	11.06	$	0.12
Quarter ended March 31, 2013	$	12.33	$	10.26	$	0.12

					$	0.48

Year ended December 31, 2012
Quarter ended December 31, 2012	$	12.58	$	11.03	$	0.12
Quarter ended September 30, 2012	$	12.64	$	11.12	$	0.12
Quarter ended June 30, 2012	$	12.47	$	10.29	$	0.12
Quarter ended March 31, 2012	$	13.29	$	11.06	$	0.12

					$	0.48

Dividend Policy

The timing and amount of cash dividends paid to the Company’s preferred and common shareholders depends on the Company’s earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other relevant factors. The ability of Banc of California, Inc. to pay cash dividends to its preferred and common shareholders depends, in large part, upon its receipt of dividends from the Bank, because Banc of California, Inc. has limited sources of income other than dividends from the Bank. There were no dividends paid from the Bank to Banc of California, Inc. during 2013. For a description of the regulatory restrictions on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to Banc of California, Inc., and on the ability of Banc of California, Inc. to pay dividends to its shareholders, see “Item 1. Business—Regulation and Supervision.”

As of December 31, 2013, the Company had 82,250 shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding, consisting of 32,000 shares of Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, liquidation amount $1,000 per share (Series A Preferred Stock), 10,000 shares of Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B, liquidation amount $1,000 per share (Series B Preferred Stock), and 40,250 shares of 8.00 percent Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, liquidation amount $1,000 per share (Series C Preferred Stock

and together with the Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock, the Preferred Stock). Each series of the Preferred Stock ranks equally (pari passu) with each other series of the Preferred Stock and senior to our common stock in the payment of dividends and in the distribution of assets on any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Banc of California, Inc.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table presents information for the three months ended December 31, 2013 with respect to repurchases by the Company of its common stock:


	Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Weighted Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans		Total Number of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Plan
10/1/13-10/31/13		91,301	$	14.01		83,132		1,046,152
11/1/13-11/30/13		81,752	$	13.14		72,289		973,863
12/1/13-12/31/13		102,639	$	13.11		75,905		897,958

Total		275,692	$	13.42		231,326

On September 5, 2013, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved changes to the Company’s previously announced share buyback program authorizing the Company to buy back, from time to time during the 12 months ending September 3, 2014, an aggregate amount representing up to 10 percent of the Company’s then currently outstanding common shares. The buyback program included a 10b5-1 plan that was adopted by the Company on September 3, 2013 pursuant to which up to a maximum of 300,000 shares could be repurchased during the year ended December 31, 2013, subject to certain price and volume restrictions. The 10b5-1 plan has now terminated as the 300,000 maximum share amount authorized for repurchase has now been exhausted.

The Company has a practice of buying back stock for tax purposes pertaining to employee benefit plans, and does not count these purchases toward the allotment of the shares. The Company has purchased 9,914 shares during the three months ended December 31, 2013 at an average price of $13.35 with a total cost of $132 thousand, including fees, related to tax liability sales for employee stock benefit plans.

Stock Performance Graph

The following graph and related discussion are being furnished solely to accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K and shall not be deemed to be “soliciting materials” or to be “filed” with the SEC (other than as provided in Item 201) nor shall this information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained therein, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into a filing.

The following graph shows a comparison of stockholder return on Banc of California, Inc.’s common stock with the cumulative total returns for: 1) the Nasdaq Composite^® (U.S.) Index; 2) the Standard and Poor’s (S&P) 500 Financials Index; and 3) the SNL Bank $1B-$5B Index, which was compiled by SNL Financial LC of Charlottesville, Virginia. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 and reinvestment of dividends. The graph is historical only and may not be indicative of possible future performance.

LOGO


	Period Ending
Index	12/31/08		12/31/09		12/31/10		12/31/11		12/31/12		12/31/13
Banc of California, Inc.		100.00		57.77		147.25		117.63		146.63		166.34
NASDAQ Composite		100.00		145.36		171.74		170.38		200.63		281.22
S&P 500 Financials		100.00		117.22		131.44		109.01		140.43		190.46
SNL Bank $1B-$5B Index		100.00		71.68		81.25		74.10		91.37		132.87

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth certain consolidated financial and other data of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included herein at Item 7 and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included herein at Item 8.


	As of or for the year ended December 31,
	2013⁽⁵⁾			2012 ⁽⁶⁾			2011			2010			2009
	($ in thousands, except per share data)
Selected Financial Condition Data:
Total assets	$	3,628,023		$	1,682,702		$	999,041		$	861,621		$	893,921
Cash and cash equivalents		110,118			108,643			44,475			59,100			34,596
Loans and leases receivable, net excluding loans held for sale		2,427,306			1,234,023			775,609			678,175			748,303
Loans held for sale		716,733			113,158			—			—			—
Real estate owned, net		—			4,527			14,692			6,562			5,680
Securities available-for-sale		170,022			121,419			101,616			64,790			52,304
Bank owned life insurance		18,881			18,704			18,451			18,151			17,932
Other investments (interest-bearing term deposit)		1,846			5,027			—			—			—
FHLB and other bank stock		22,600			8,842			6,972			8,323			9,364
Deposits		2,918,644			1,306,342			786,334			646,308			658,432
Total borrowings		332,320			156,935			20,000			75,000			135,000
Total equity		324,869			188,757			184,495			136,009			97,485
Selected Operations Data:
Total interest income	$	120,511		$	55,031		$	35,177		$	40,944		$	46,666
Total interest expense		23,282			8,479			6,037			10,788			17,976
Net interest income		97,229			46,552			29,140			30,156			28,690
Provision for loan losses		7,963			5,500			5,388			8,957			17,296
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		89,266			41,052			23,752			21,199			11,394
Total non-interest income		96,743			36,619			4,913			4,879			1,813
Total non-interest expense		178,670			71,560			31,689			22,217			15,901
Income/(loss) before income taxes		7,339			6,111			(3,024	)		3,861			(2,694	)
Income tax expense/(benefit)		7,260			115			(296	)		1,036			(1,695	)
Net income/(loss)		79			5,996			(2,728	)		2,825			(999	)
Dividends paid on preferred stock and discount accretion		2,185			1,359			534			960			1,003
Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders		(2,106	)		4,637			(3,262	)		1,865			(2,002	)
Basic earnings/(loss) per common share	$	(0.14	)	$	0.40		$	(0.31	)	$	0.37		$	(0.48	)
Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share	$	(0.14	)	$	0.40		$	(0.31	)	$	0.37		$	(0.48	)
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:
Performance ratios:
Return on average assets		0.00	%		0.45	%		-0.31	%		0.32	%		-0.10	%
Return on average equity		0.03	%		3.17	%		-1.71	%		2.59	%		-0.61	%
Dividend payout ratio (ratio of dividends declared per common share to basic earnings per common share) (1)		—			120.00	%		—			67.57	%		—
Interest Rate Spread Information:
Average during year		3.49	%		3.49	%		3.31	%		3.38	%		3.00	%
Net interest margin (2)		3.67	%		3.69	%		3.48	%		3.58	%		3.32	%
Ratio of operating expense to average total assets		6.44	%		5.33	%		3.54	%		2.50	%		1.63	%
Efficiency ratio (3)		92.11	%		86.04	%		93.06	%		63.41	%		52.13	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		121.07	%		127.14	%		124.20	%		115.23	%		115.18	%
Credit Quality Ratios and Other Data:
Nonperforming assets to total assets		0.87	%		1.64	%		3.40	%		5.27	%		5.80	%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans (4)		59.42	%		62.84	%		66.38	%		37.70	%		28.33	%
Allowance for loan losses to gross loans (4)		0.77	%		1.16	%		1.62	%		2.11	%		1.72	%
Nonperforming loans	$	31,648		$	22,993		$	19,254		$	38,830		$	46,172
Nonperforming assets	$	31,648		$	27,520		$	33,946		$	45,392		$	51,852
Capital Ratios:
Equity to total assets at end of year		8.95	%		11.22	%		18.47	%		15.79	%		10.91	%
Average equity to average assets		9.55	%		14.11	%		17.89	%		12.25	%		16.75	%

(1)

Not applicable due to the net loss reported for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2011, and 2009

(2)

Net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

(3)

Efficiency ratio represents noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest income plus noninterest income.

(4)

The allowance for loan and lease losses at December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010, and 2009 was $18.8 million, $14.4 million, $12.8 million, $14.6 million and $13.1 million, respectively.

(5)

The Company completed its acquisition of PBOC effective July 1, 2013.

(6)

The Company completed its acquisitions of Beach and Gateway effective July 1, 2012 and August 18, 2012, respectively.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies

Securities

Under FASB Codification Topic 320 (ASC 320), Investments-Debt and Equity Securities, investment securities must be classified as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale or trading. Management determines the appropriate classification at the time of purchase. The classification of securities is significant since it directly impacts the accounting for unrealized gains and losses on securities. Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and the Company has the ability to hold the securities to maturity. Securities not classified as held-to-maturity are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, with the unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, reported in other comprehensive income (loss) and do not affect earnings until realized unless a decline in fair value below amortized cost is considered to be other than temporarily impaired (OTTI).

The fair values of the Company’s securities are generally determined by reference to quoted prices from reliable independent sources utilizing observable inputs. Certain of the Company’s fair values of securities are determined using models whose significant value drivers or assumptions are unobservable and are significant to the fair value of the securities. These models are utilized when quoted prices are not available for certain securities or in markets where trading activity has slowed or ceased. When quoted prices are not available and are not provided by third party pricing services, management judgment is necessary to determine fair value. As such, fair value is determined using discounted cash flow analysis models, incorporating default rates, estimation of prepayment characteristics and implied volatilities.

The Company evaluates all securities on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic conditions warrant additional evaluations, for determining if other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) exists pursuant to guidelines established in ASC 320. In evaluating the possible impairment of securities, consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial conditions and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the ability and intent of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, the Company may consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies or government sponsored agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition.

If management determines that an investment experienced an OTTI, management must then determine the amount of the OTTI to be recognized in earnings. If management does not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period loss, the OTTI will be separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the OTTI related to other factors will be recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings will become the new amortized cost basis of the investment. If management intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period credit loss, the OTTI will be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. Any recoveries related to the value of these securities are recorded as an unrealized gain (as other comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders’ equity) and not recognized in income until the security is ultimately sold.

The Company from time to time may dispose of an impaired security in response to asset/liability management decisions, future market movements, business plan changes, or if the net proceeds can be reinvested at a rate of return that is expected to recover the loss within a reasonable period of time.

Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans and Leases

The Company purchases loans and leases with and without evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination. Evidence of credit quality deterioration as of the purchase date may include statistics such as prior loan or lease modification history, updated borrower credit scores and updated loan or lease-to-value (LTV) ratios, some of which are not immediately available as of the purchase date. Purchased loans and leases with evidence of credit quality deterioration where the Company estimates that it will not receive all contractual payments are accounted for as purchased credit impaired loans and leases (PCI loans and leases). The excess of the cash flows expected to be collected on PCI loans and leases, measured as of the acquisition date, over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income over the remaining life of the loan or lease using a level yield methodology. The difference between contractually required payments as of the acquisition date and the cash flows expected to be collected is referred to as the nonaccretable difference. PCI loans and leases that have similar risk characteristics, primarily credit risk, collateral type and interest rate risk, are pooled and accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows.

The Company estimates cash flows expected to be collected over the life of the loan or lease using management’s best estimate of current key assumptions such as default rates, loss severity and payment speeds. If, upon subsequent evaluation, the Company determines it is probable that the present value of the expected cash flows have decreased, the PCI loan or lease is considered further impaired which will result in a charge to the provision for loan and lease losses and a corresponding increase to a valuation allowance included in the allowance for loan and lease losses. If, upon subsequent evaluation, it is probable that there is an increase in the present value of the expected cash flows, the Company will reduce any remaining valuation allowance. If there is no remaining valuation allowance, the Company will recalculate the amount of accretable yield as the excess of the revised expected cash flows over the current carrying value resulting in a reclassification from nonaccretable difference to accretable yield. The present value of the expected cash flows for PCI purchased loan pools is determined using the PCI loans’ effective interest rate, adjusted for changes in the PCI loans’ interest rate indexes. The present value of the expected cash flows for PCI loans and leases acquired through mergers with other banks includes, in addition to the above, an evaluation of the credit worthiness of the borrower. Loan and lease dispositions, which may include sales of loans and leases, receipt of payments in full from the borrower or foreclosure, result in removal of the loan or lease from the PCI loan or lease pool. Write-downs are not recorded on the PCI loan or lease pool until actual losses exceed the remaining nonaccretable difference. To date, no write-downs have been recorded for the PCI loans and leases held by the Company, all of which were purchased by the Company during 2012 and 2013.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan and lease losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses, increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs less recoveries. Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, peer group information, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions, and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes that the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed.

The Company believes that the allowance for loan losses and related provision expense are particularly susceptible to change in the near term, as a result of changes in the credit quality, which are evidenced by charge-offs and nonperforming loan trends. Changes in economic conditions, the mix and size of the loan portfolio and individual borrower conditions can dramatically impact the level of allowance for loan losses in relatively short periods of time. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that represents the best estimate of probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions or other factors. In addition, banking regulators, as an integral part of their examination

process, periodically review the allowance for loan losses. These regulatory agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance for loan losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. Management evaluates current information and events regarding a borrower’s ability to repay its obligations and considers a loan to be impaired when the ultimate collectability of amounts due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, is in doubt. If an impaired loan is collateral-dependent, the fair value of the collateral is used to determine the amount of impairment. Impairment losses are included in the allowance for loan losses through a charge to the provision for loan losses. Subsequent recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan losses. Cash receipts for accruing loans are applied to principal and interest under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Cash receipts for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued are applied first to principal and then to interest income, if there is no doubt that the principal balance is fully collectible.

Other Real Estate Owned

Foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. Management estimates the fair value of the properties based on current appraisal information. Fair value estimates are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the economic environment, market conditions, and real estate market. A worsening or protracted economic decline would increase the likelihood of a decline in property values and could create the need to write down the properties through current operations.

Mortgage Loan Repurchase Obligations and Reserve for Loss Reimbursements on Sold Loans

In the ordinary course of business, as loans held for sale are sold, the Bank makes standard industry representations and warranties about the loans. The Bank may have to subsequently repurchase certain loans or reimburse certain investor losses due to defects that occurred in the origination of the loans. Such defects include documentation or underwriting errors. In addition, certain investor contracts require the Bank to repurchase loans from previous whole loan sales transactions that experience early payment defaults. If there are no such defects or early payment defaults, the Bank has no commitment to repurchase loans that it has sold. The level of reserve for loss reimbursements on sold loans is an estimate that requires considerable management judgment. The Bank’s reserve is based upon the expected future repurchase trends for loans already sold in whole loan sale transactions and the expected valuation of such loans when repurchased, and include first and second trust deed loans. At the point the loans are repurchased, the associated reserves are transferred to the allowance for loan and lease losses. At the point when loss reimbursements are made directly to the investor, the reserve for loss reimbursements on sold loans is charged for the losses incurred.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill resulting from business combinations is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but are periodically evaluated for impairment at the reporting unit level. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values.

In accordance with ASU 2011-08 Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. In other words, before the first step of the existing guidance, the entity has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that the fair value of goodwill is less than carrying value. The qualitative assessment includes adverse events or circumstances identified that could negatively affect the reporting units’ fair value as well as positive and mitigating events. Such indicators may include, among others: a significant change in legal factors or in the general business climate; significant change in the Company’s stock price and market capitalization; unanticipated competition; and an action or assessment by a regulator. If, after assessing the totality of events or

circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step process is unnecessary. The entity has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment step for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to the first step of the exiting two-step process. The entity can resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period.

The first step of the goodwill impairment test is performed, when considered necessary, by comparing the reporting unit’s aggregate fair value to its carrying value. Absent other indicators of impairment, if the aggregate fair value exceeds the carrying value, goodwill is not considered impaired and no additional analysis is necessary. If the carrying value of the reporting unit were to exceed the aggregate fair value, a second step would be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. To measure any impairment loss the implied fair value would be determined in the same manner as if the reporting unit were being acquired in a business combination. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the recorded goodwill an impairment charge would be recorded for the difference. No goodwill impairment charges were required for the year ended December 31, 2013. For year ended December 31, 2013, the Company’s qualitative assessment concluded that a two-step impairment test of goodwill was not necessary. Even though there was no goodwill impairment at December 31, 2013, adverse events may impact the recoverability of goodwill and could result in a future impairment charge which could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite life on our consolidated statements of financial condition.

Other intangible assets consist of core deposit intangibles and trade name intangibles arising from whole bank and their subsidiaries acquisitions, and are generally amortized on an accelerated method over their estimated useful lives of 2-7 years and 1-20 years, respectively.

Deferred Income Taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Deferred tax assets are also recognized for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Accounting guidance requires that companies assess whether a valuation allowance should be established against their deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard.

Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management evaluates both positive and negative evidence, including the existence of any cumulative losses in the current year and the prior two years, the amount of taxes paid in available carry-back years, the forecasts of future income and tax planning strategies.

The Company had a full valuation allowance of $17.3 million against net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2013. At December 31, 2012, the Company had a valuation allowance of $8.4 million, resulting a net deferred tax assets of $7.6 million.

Executive Management Overview

This overview of management’s discussion and analysis highlights selected information in the financial results of the Company and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. For a more complete understanding of trends, commitments, uncertainties, liquidity, capital resources and critical accounting policies and estimates, you should carefully read this entire document. Each of these items could have an impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company is the bank holding company of the Bank. The Company derives substantially all of its revenues from the retail, commercial, and mortgage banking services provided by the Bank.

The Company’s assets consist primarily of loans and investment securities, which are funded by deposits, borrowings and capital. The primary source of revenue is net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses, which is the difference between interest income on loans and investments, and interest expense on deposits and borrowed funds, less the amount of provision for loan and lease losses. The Company also generates non-interest income by providing fee based banking services and by the origination and sale of conventional conforming and FHA/VA residential mortgage loans to the secondary market. The Company’s basic strategy is to maintain and grow net interest income and non-interest income by the retention of its existing customer base and the expansion of its core businesses and branch offices within its current market and plans to expand its banking offices further into Southern California and its loan production offices throughout the western United States. The Company’s primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk and credit risk.

The Company announced July 16, 2013 that its corporate name was changed from First PacTrust Bancorp, Inc. to Banc of California, Inc. The new name is intended to reflect the Company’s goal to be the leading community banking organization serving businesses and families in California.

On July 1, 2013, the Company completed its previously announced acquisition of The Private Bank of California (PBOC). The acquisition was accomplished by merging PBOC into Beach Business Bank (Beach), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Upon completion of the transaction, Beach was renamed “The Private Bank of California.” On October 11, 2013, the Company merged PBOC, a California-chartered bank, with the Company’s other banking subsidiary, Pacific Trust Bank, a federal savings bank, to form the Bank, which has a national bank charter issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Unless the context indicates otherwise, references to the “Bank” prior to October 11, 2013 mean Pacific Trust Bank and PBOC (Beach prior to July 1, 2013), collectively, and references to the “Bank” on or after October 11, 2013 refer to Banc of California, National Association.

In connection with the rebranding and renaming of the Company and the Bank, the Bank’s mortgage banking operations of Mission Hills Mortgage Bankers and PacTrust Home Mortgage were consolidated and rebranded under a single national brand, Banc Home Loans. As a mortgage banking operation of Banc of California, Banc Home Loans will be positioned to leverage all of the products and resources of the Bank as Banc Home Loans seeks to establish a national presence as a leading provider and innovator in the residential lending business.

The Bank is a community-oriented financial institution offering a variety of financial services to meet the banking and financial needs of the communities the Bank serves. The Bank is headquartered in Orange County, California. On October 4, 2013, eight of the Bank’s banking offices were sold to AmericanWest Bank. The sale of these banking offices is a key part of the Bank’s ongoing effort to improve its overall efficiency and profitability and to reshape the Bank’s retail branch network to focus on servicing small – to mid – sized businesses and high net worth families throughout Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego Counties. As a result, the Bank now operates 15 banking offices in San Diego, Orange, Los Angeles Counties in California and 68 producing loan production offices in in California, Arizona, Oregon, Montana, Virginia and Washington.

The principal business of the Bank consists of attracting deposits from the general public and investing these funds primarily in loans secured by first mortgages on owner-occupied, one-to-four family residences, a variety of consumer loans, multi-family and commercial real estate and commercial business loans. The Bank offers a variety of deposit accounts for both individuals and businesses with varying rates and terms, which generally include savings accounts, money market deposits, certificate accounts and checking accounts. The Bank solicits deposits in its market area and, to a lesser extent, from institutional depositors nationwide, and in the past has accepted brokered deposits. The Bank also provides SBA loans, as member of the SBA’s Preferred Lender Program. In addition, the acquisition of PBOC gave the Company the ability to offer specialized private banking services to high net worth individuals, family owned businesses, entrepreneurs, law firms, the entertainment business and others who require a very high level of personalized banking services and customized solutions.

2013 Highlights

•

Completed the acquisitions of PBOC, Palisades and CS Financial.

•

Total interest and dividend income for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $65.5 million, or 119.0 percent, to $120.5 million from $55.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.

•

Net interest margin was 3.67 percent and 3.69 percent for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

•

Net interest income increased by $50.7 million, or 108.9 percent, to $97.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $46.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.

•

Non-interest income increased by $60.1 million, or 164.2 percent, to $96.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $36.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The Company recognized a $67.9 million on net gain on mortgage banking activities and a $12.1 million gain on sale of branches for the year ended December 31, 2013.

•

Non-interest expense increased by $107.1 million, or 149.7 percent, to $178.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $71.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase relates predominantly to the acquisitions the Company completed during 2013 along with growth during 2013 related to the mortgage banking strategy.

•

Total assets increased by $1.95 billion, or 115.6 percent, to $3.63 billion at December 31, 2013 from $1.68 billion at December 31, 2012, due primarily to the acquisitions during 2013 and the seasoned SFR mortgage loan pool purchases during 2013. Average assets increased to $2.77 billion in 2013 from $1.34 billion in 2012.

•

Loans and leases receivable, net of allowance for loan and lease losses, increased by $1.19 billion, or 96.7 percent, to $2.43 billion at December 31, 2013 from $1.23 billion at December 31, 2012. Average gross loans and leases receivable increased to $2.22 billion in 2013 from $1.05 billion in 2012.

•

Total deposits increased by $1.61 billion, or 123.4 percent, to $2.92 billion at December 31, 2013 from $1.31 billion at December 31, 2012.

•

Expanded the mortgage origination platform by opening new retail loan production offices and commencing a wholesale origination channel. Banc Home Loans originated $1.94 billion and sold $1.86 billion during the year ended December 31, 2013.

•

Purchased five seasoned SFR mortgage loan pools with unpaid principal balances and fair values of $1.02 billion of conforming residential mortgage loans and $849.9 million at the respective acquisition dates.

Result of Operations

The following table presents condensed statements of operations for the periods indicated:


	Year ended December 31,
	2013			2012		2011
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Interest and dividend income	$	120,511		$	55,031	$	35,177
Interest expense		23,282			8,479		6,037

Net interest income		97,229			46,552		29,140
Provision for loan and lease losses		7,963			5,500		5,388

Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses		89,266			41,052		23,752
Noninterest income		96,743			36,619		4,913
Noninterest expense		178,670			71,560		31,689

Income (loss) before income taxes		7,339			6,111		(3,024	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		7,260			115		(296	)

Net income (loss)		79			5,996		(2,728	)
Preferred stock dividends		2,185			1,359		534

Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	(2,106	)	$	4,637	$	(3,262	)

Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	(0.14	)	$	0.40	$	(0.31	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	(0.14	)	$	0.40	$	(0.31	)
Basic earnings (loss) per class B common share	$	(0.14	)	$	0.40	$	(0.31	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per class B common share	$	(0.14	)	$	0.40	$	(0.31	)

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded net income of $79 thousand, a decrease of $5.9 million from net income of $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, and an increase of $2.8 million from a net loss of $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Net loss attributable to common shareholders was $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease of $6.7 million from a net income available to shareholders of $4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, and an increase of $1.2 million from a net loss attributable to shareholders of $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2012, net income increased by $8.7 million to $6.0 million and net income available to common shareholders increased by $8.0 million to $4.6 million.

Net Interest Income

The following table presents the total amount of interest income from average interest-earning assets and the resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates for the periods indicated. Also presented is the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets, rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, net interest margin and the resultant net interest spread. No tax equivalent adjustments were made. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accruing loans and lease have been included in the table as loans and leases carrying a zero yield.


	For the year ended December 31,
	2013								2012								2011
	Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield/Cost ⁽⁵⁾			Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield/Cost ⁽⁵⁾			Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield/Cost ⁽⁵⁾
	($ in thousands)
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS
Gross loans and leases (1)	$	2,217,421		$	116,673		5.26	%	$	1,053,240		$	51,942		4.93	%	$	693,585		$	30,997		4.47	%
Securities		153,229			2,632		1.72	%		115,467			2,736		2.37	%		84,167			3,963		4.71	%
Other interest-earning assets (2)		276,420			1,206		0.44	%		97,902			353		0.36	%		60,130			217		0.36	%

Total interest-earning assets		2,647,070			120,511		4.55	%		1,266,609			55,031		4.34	%		837,882			35,177		4.20	%

Allowance for loan and lease losses		(17,332	)							(11,968	)							(10,484	)
BOLI and non-interest earning assets (3)		143,538								88,203								66,860

Total assets	$	2,773,276							$	1,342,844							$	894,258

INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES
Savings	$	756,625		$	7,994		1.06	%	$	261,667		$	1,096		0.42	%	$	215,971		$	319		0.15	%
NOW		339,731			2,041		0.60	%		29,802			99		0.33	%		10,246			81		0.79	%
Money market		371,058			1,901		0.51	%		67,569			271		0.40	%		9,974			306		3.07	%
Certificates of deposit		558,994			4,115		0.74	%		556,326			4,494		0.81	%		398,498			4,283		1.07	%
FHLB advances		74,712			269		0.36	%		54,030			348		0.64	%		39,918			1,048		2.63	%
Long-term debt and other interest-bearing liabilities		85,333			6,962		8.16	%		26,840			2,171		8.09	%		—			—		0.00	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities		2,186,453			23,282		1.06	%		996,234			8,479		0.85	%		674,607			6,037		0.89	%

Noninterest-bearing deposits		287,325								141,573								54,580
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		34,680								15,626								5,112

Total liabilities		2,508,458								1,153,433								734,299
Total shareholders’ equity		264,818								189,411								159,959

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	2,773,276							$	1,342,844							$	894,258

Net interest income/spread				$	97,229		3.49	%				$	46,552		3.49	%				$	29,140		3.31	%

Net interest margin (4)							3.67	%							3.69	%							3.48	%

Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities		121.07	%							127.14	%							124.20	%

(1)

Gross loans and leases are net of deferred fees and costs, related direct costs and discounts, but exclude the allowance for loan and lease losses. Non-accrual loans are included in the average balance. Loan fees of $1.7 million, $615 thousand, and $10 thousand, and accretion of discount on purchased loans of $20.3 million, $2.2 million, and none for the year ended 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively, are included in interest income.

(2)	Includes FHLB stock at cost and term deposits with other financial institutions

(3)	Includes BOLI investment of $18.8 million, $18.6 million and $18.3 million at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively

(4)	Net interest income divided by interest-earning assets

(5)	Not on a tax equivalent basis

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents the amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) changes in volume, which are changes in volume multiplied by the old rate, and (2) changes in rate, which are changes in rate multiplied by the old volume. Changes attributable to both rate and volume which cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.


	For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 compared to 2012								For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 compared to 2011
	Total Change			Change Due To Volume		Change Due To Rate			Total Change			Change Due To Volume		Change Due To Rate
	(In thousands)
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS
Gross loans and leases	$	64,731		$	61,036	$	3,695		$	20,945		$	17,460	$	3,485
Securities		(104	)		761		(865	)		(1,227	)		1,161		(2,388	)
Other interest-earning assets		853			765		88			136			136		—

Total interest-earning assets		65,480			62,562		2,918			19,854			18,757		1,097

INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES
Savings	$	6,898		$	3,822	$	3,076		$	777		$	80	$	697
NOW		1,942			1,802		140			18			86		(68	)
Money market		1,630			1,535		95			(35	)		432		(467	)
Certificates of deposit		(379	)		22		(401	)		211			1,437		(1,226	)
FHLB advances		(79	)		106		(185	)		(700	)		281		(981	)
Long-term debt and other interest-bearing liabilities		4,791			4,772		19			2,171			2,171		—

Total interest-bearing liabilities		14,803			12,059		2,744			2,442			4,487		(2,045	)

Net Interest Income	$	50,677		$	50,503	$	174		$	17,412		$	14,270	$	3,142

Net interest income increased by $50.7 million and $17.4 million, or 108.9 percent and 59.8 percent, to $97.2 million and $46.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, comparing to the prior years.

Interest income increased by $65.5 million, or 119.0 percent, to $120.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, due mainly to increases in average balances of all interest-earning assets, and increases in average yield of loans and other interest-bearing earning assets, partially offset by a decrease in average yield of securities. For the year ended December 31, 2012, interest income increased by $19.9 million, or 56.4 percent, to $55.0 million, due mainly to increases of average balances in all interest-earning assets and an increase in average yield on loans, partially offset by a decrease in average yield of securities.

Interest income on loans and leases increased by $64.7 million, or 124.6 percent, to $116.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, due mainly to an increase in average balance of $1.16 billion, or 110.5 percent, to $2.22 billion and an increase in average yield of 33 basis points (bps) to 5.26 percent. The increase in average balance was due mainly to acquired loans of $385.3 million from the PBOC acquisition and purchases of the seasoned SFR mortgage loan pools with unpaid principal balances and fair values of $1.02 billion and $849.9 million at the respective acquisition dates. The increase in average yield was mainly due to the higher yields on the acquired loans from PBOC, which had a high concentration of commercial and industrial loans that generally had higher yields than mortgage loans, and on seasoned SFR mortgage loan pools, which discounts on these pools would generate additional interest income. Such discount accretion totaled $20.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2012, interest income on loans and leases increased by $20.9 million, or 67.6 percent, to $51.9 million, due mainly to an increase in average balance of $359.7

million, or 51.9 percent, to $1.05 billion and an increase in average yield of 46 bps to 4.93 percent. The increase in average balance was mainly due to acquired loans of $361.0 million from the Beach and Gateway acquisitions and purchases of the seasoned SFR mortgage loan pools with unpaid principal balances and fair values of $114.8 million and $66.7 million at the respective acquisition dates. The increase in average yield was mainly due to the higher yields on seasoned SFR mortgage loan pools, which discounts on these pools generate additional interest income. Such discount accretion totaled $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Interest income on securities decreased by $104 thousand, 3.8 percent, to $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, due mainly to a decrease in average yield of 65 bps to 1.72 percent, partially offset by an increase in average balance of $37.8 million to $153.2 million. The decrease in average yield was mainly due to the current low interest-rate environment and the increase in average balance was mainly due to acquired securities of $219.3 million from the PBOC acquisition and purchases of $71.1 million, partially offset by sales, calls, paid offs, and pay-downs of $237.9 million. For the year ended December 31, 2012, interest income on securities decreased by $1.2 million, or 31.0 percent, to $2.7 million, due mainly to a decrease in average yield of 234 bps to 2.37 percent, partially offset by an increase in average balance of $31.3 million to $115.5 million. The decrease in average yield was due mainly to an overall decrease in market rates.

Interest expense increased by $14.8 million and $2.4 million, or 174.6 percent and 40.5 percent, to $23.3 million and $8.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increases were due mainly to increases in average balances and average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits increased by $10.1 million, or 169.3 percent, to $16.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, due mainly to an increase in average balance of $1.11 billion, or 121.4 percent, to $2.03 billion and an increase in average cost of 14 bps to 0.79 percent. The increase in average balance was mainly due to acquired interest-bearing deposits of $325.8 million from the PBOC acquisition and $1.37 billion of deposits generated through strategic plans aiming to increase core deposits by launching interest-bearing core deposit products with enhanced features to attract high net worth depositors, partially offset by $464.3 million of deposits sold to AWB. The increase in average cost was due mainly to the higher interest rates on those deposits generated through strategic plans. For the year ended December 31, 2012, interest expense on interest-bearing deposits increased by $971 thousand, or 19.5 percent, to $6.0 million, due mainly to an increase in average balance of $280.7 million, 44.2 percent, to $915.4 million, partially offset by a decrease in average cost of 14 bps to 0.65 percent. The increase in average balance was due mainly to acquired deposits of $414.3 million from Beach and Gateway acquisitions and the decrease in average cost was due mainly to the overall decreases in short-term market interest rates during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Interest expense on FHLB advances decreased by $79 thousand and $700 thousand, or 22.7 percent and 66.8 percent, to $269 thousand and $348 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, due mainly to the replacement of matured long-term advances with short-term advances.

Interest expense on long-term debt and other interest-bearing liabilities increased by $4.8 million, or 220.7 percent, to $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, due mainly to the full-year impact on average balances of two issuances of the Company’s Senior Notes, in April and December of 2012. The Company did not have any interest expense for the Senior Notes during the year ended December 31, 2011.

Provision for Loan and Lease Losses

The Company maintains an allowance for loan and lease losses to absorb probable expected losses presently inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance is based on ongoing assessments of the estimated probable losses presently inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. In evaluating the level of the allowance for loan and lease losses, management considers the types of loans and leases and the amount of loans and leases in the loan portfolio, peer group information, historical loss experience, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions. The Company currently takes into account many factors, including the Company’s own historical and peer loss trends, loan and

lease-level credit quality ratings, loan and lease specific attributes along with a review of various credit metrics and trends. In addition, the Company uses adjustments for numerous factors including those found in the Interagency Guidance on Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses, which include current economic conditions, loan and lease seasoning, underwriting experience, and collateral value changes among others.

The Company evaluates all impaired loans and leases individually, primarily through the evaluation of cash flows or collateral values. Management uses available information to recognize loan and lease losses, however, future loan and lease loss provisions may be necessary based on changes in the above mentioned factors. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the allowance for loan and lease losses and may require the Bank to recognize additional provisions based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination. The allowance for loan and lease losses as of December 31, 2013 was maintained at a level that represented management’s best estimate of incurred losses in the loan and lease portfolio to the extent they were both probable and reasonably estimable as of the balance sheet date. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available or as future events change. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company acquired five pools of loans that were partially ASC 310-30 loans. During the year ended December 31, 2013, there was no provision for loan and lease losses or allowance for loan and lease losses related to these pools as these loans were acquired at 16.9 percent discount to the aggregated unpaid principal balances and there was no impairment on these pools. The Company may recognize provision for loan and lease losses in the future should there be further deterioration in these loans after the purchase date should the impairment exceed the non-accretable yield and purchased discount.

Provisions for loan and lease losses are charged to operations at a level required to reflect probable incurred credit losses in the loan and lease portfolio. In this regard, a majority of the Company’s loans and leases are to individuals and businesses in Southern California. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company provided $8.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively, to its provision for loan and lease losses. The increase in 2013 related primarily to general reserve allocations on new loan and lease originations and impairments on seasoned SFR mortgage loan pools and PCI loans related to the Beach, Gateway and PBOC acquisitions. On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates the PCI loans relating to the Beach, Gateway, and PBOC acquisitions and the loan pools for potential impairment. We had $707 thousand and no provision for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for PCI loans. The provision for losses on these loans is the result of changes in expected cash flows, both amount and timing, due to loan payments and the Company’s revised loss forecasts. The revisions of the loss forecasts were based on the results of management’s review of the credit quality of the outstanding loans/loan pools and the analysis of the loan performance data since the acquisition of these loans. The Company will continue updating cash flow projections on PCI loans on a quarterly basis. Due to the uncertainty in the future performance of the PCI loans, additional impairments may be recognized in the future.

Noninterest Income

The following table sets forth the breakdown of non-interest income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:


	Year ended December 31,							Change in
	2013		2012			2011		2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Customer service fees	$	1,942	$	1,883		$	1,473	$	59		$	410
Loan servicing income		2,049		92			—		1,957			92
Income from bank owned life insurance		177		253			300		(76	)		(47	)
Net gain (loss) on sales of securities available for sale		331		(83	)		2,888		414			(2,971	)
Net gain on sale of loans		8,700		1,106			—		7,594			1,106
Net gain on mortgage banking activities		67,890		21,310			—		46,580			21,310
Gain on sale of branches		12,104		—			—		12,104			—
Bargain purchase gain		—		11,627			—		(11,627	)		11,627
Other income		3,550		431			252		3,119			179

Total noninterest income	$	96,743	$	36,619		$	4,913	$	60,124		$	31,706

Noninterest income increased by $60.1 million and $31.7 million, or 164.2 percent and 645.3 percent, to $96.7 million and $36.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in noninterest income from 2012 to 2013 relates predominantly to increases in net gain on mortgage banking activities, net gain on sale of loans, and gain on sale of branches, partially offset by the absence in 2013 of a bargain purchase gain recognized in 2012 for the acquisition of Gateway. The increase in noninterest income from 2011 to 2012 relates predominantly to net gain on mortgage banking activities and a bargain purchase gain for the acquisition of Gateway.

Customer service fees increased by $59 thousand and $410 thousand, or 3.1 percent and 27.8 percent, to $1.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, due mainly to a continuous increase in transaction deposits. The increase for 2013 was flattened despite the fact of the transaction deposit increase, due to the Company’s strategy of attracting high net worth deposits into core deposits and the sale of eight branches that adversely impacted number of overall transaction accounts in this deposit category, which is the primary source of service fees.

Loan servicing income was $2.0 million and $92 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, due mainly to the expansion of the Company’s mortgage banking activities.

Net gain (loss) on sales of securities available for sale was $331 thousand, $(83) thousand and $2.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During 2011, the Company was able to profitably reduce risk within its investment portfolio by adjusting the mix of the portfolio to reduce private label mortgage-backed securities and increase agency mortgage-backed securities. These sales took place during the time where interest rates were falling and prices were rising, resulting in a net gain. During 2012 and 2013, the Company continued its strategy of reducing risk of the securities portfolio by eliminating lower grade and undesirable bonds.

The net gain on the sale of loans of $8.7 million resulted from the sale of SBA and single family residential mortgage loans. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company sold $2.5 million of SBA loans and realized a gain of $120 thousand. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company sold a portion of seasoned SFR loan pools totaling $113.0 million realizing a gain of $3.4 million.

The Company reported $67.9 million in net gain on mortgage banking activities. The amount of net gain on mortgage banking activities is a function of mortgage loans originated for sale and the fair value of these loans. Net gain on mortgage banking activities includes mark to market pricing adjustments on loan commitments and forward sales contracts, initial capitalized value of mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) and loan origination fees.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Bank originated $1.94 billion of conforming single family residential mortgage loans and sold $1.86 billion of loans in the secondary market. The net gain and margin were $58.0 million and 3.0 percent, respectively, and loan origination fees were $9.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Included in the net gain is the initial capitalized value of our MSRs, which totaled $10.9 million, on loans sold to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Gain on sale of branches of $12.1 million was recognized for the year ended December 31, 2013. On October 4, 2013, the Bank completed a branch sale transaction to AmericanWest Bank, a Washington state chartered bank (AWB). In the transaction, the Bank sold sell eight branches and related assets and deposit liabilities to AWB. The transaction was completed with a transfer of $464.3 million deposits to AWB in exchange for a deposit premium of 2.3 percent. Certain other assets related to the branches include the real estate for three of the branch locations and certain overdraft and other credit facilities related to the deposit accounts.

Bargain purchase gain of $11.6 million was recognized for the year ended December 31, 2012 from the Gateway acquisition.

Other income increased by $3.1 million and $179 thousand, or 723.7 percent and 71.0 percent, to $3.6 million and $431 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase from 2012 to 2013 was due mainly to additional broker fee income generated from non-bank subsidiaries that were acquired during 2013.

Noninterest Expense

The following table sets forth the breakdown of non-interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:


	Year ended December 31,								Change in
	2013			2012			2011		2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits, excluding commissions	$	87,239		$	36,446		$	13,914	$	50,793		$	22,532
Commissions for mortgage banking activities		23,448			5,445			—		18,003			5,445

Total salaries and employee benefits	$	110,687		$	41,891		$	13,914	$	68,796		$	27,977
Occupancy and equipment		19,662			7,902			2,848		11,760			5,054
Professional fees		13,864			7,888			2,121		5,976			5,767
Data processing		4,710			3,011			1,345		1,699			1,666
Advertising		4,361			1,046			477		3,315			569
Regulatory assessments		2,535			1,519			1,513		1,016			6
Loan servicing and foreclosure expense		905			980			1,282		(75	)		(302	)
Operating loss on equity investment		569			364			313		205			51
Valuation allowance for other real estate owned		97			703			4,843		(606	)		(4,140	)
Net gain (loss) on sales of other real estate owned		(464	)		(464	)		760		—			(1,224	)
Provision for loan repurchases		2,383			256			—		2,127			256
Amortization of intangible assets		2,651			696			—		1,955			696
Impairment on intangible assets		1,061			—			—		1,061			—
All other expense		15,649			5,768			2,273		9,881			3,495

Total noninterest expense	$	178,670		$	71,560		$	31,689	$	107,110		$	39,871

Noninterest expense increased by $107.1 million and $39.9 million, or 149.7 percent and 125.8 percent, to $178.7 million and $71.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase in noninterest expense relates predominantly to the acquisitions of the Company’s bank and non-bank subsidiaries along with growth related to the mortgage banking strategy.

Total salaries and employee benefits excluding commissions increased $50.8 million and $22.5 million, or 139.4 percent and 161.9 percent, to $87.2 million and $36.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, due mainly to additional compensation expense related to an increase in the number of full-time employees resulting from to the acquisitions of Beach, Gateway, PBOC, TPG and CS Financial and expansion in mortgage banking activities, primarily at Banc Home Loans. Commission expense, which is a variable expense, primarily related to mortgage banking activities, totaled $23.4 million and $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Total originations of single family residential mortgage loans for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 totaled $1.94 billion and $515.3 million, respectively.

Occupancy and equipment expenses increased $11.8 million and $5.1 million, or 148.8 percent and 177.5 percent, to $19.7 million and $7.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the increase was due mainly to increased building and maintenance costs associated with moving the Company headquarters to Irvine, a full year of branch costs associated with the 2012 acquisitions of Beach and Gateway, new branch locations associated with the PBOC acquisition, additional facilities costs associated with the TPG and CS acquisitions and new mortgage banking loan production offices. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the increase was due mainly to the acquisitions of Beach and Gateway and the initial expansion of mortgage banking loan production offices.

Professional fees increased by $6.0 million and $5.8 million, or 75.8 percent and 271.9 percent, to $13.9 million and $7.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increases were due mainly to accounting, legal and consulting costs associated with the acquisitions and costs associated with core system integration for both years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the branch sale to AWB and costs associated with information technology infrastructure updates for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Advertising costs increased by $3.3 million and $569 thousand, or 316.9 percent and 119.3 percent, to $4.4 million and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increases were due mainly to the overall expansion of the Company’s business footprint for the both years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and print media costs associated with deposit campaign and the Company rebranding for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Data processing expenses increased by $1.7 million and $1.7 million, or 56.4 percent and 123.9 percent, to $4.7 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, due mainly to a higher volume of transactions related to loan and deposit growth.

Regulatory assessments increased by $1.0 million, or 66.9 percent, to $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, due mainly to year-over-year balance sheet growth.

Valuation allowance for other real estate owned decreased by $606 thousand and $4.1 million, or 86.2 percent and 85.5 percent, to $97 thousand and $703 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, due mainly to a continuous improvement on asset quality. The Company also recognized gains on sales of other real estate owned of $464 thousand for each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, compared to a loss on sale of $760 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company had no other real estate owned as of December 31, 2013, compared to $4.5 million and $14.7 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Provision for loan repurchases increased by $2.1 million and $256 thousand, or 830.9 percent and from none, to $2.4 million and $256 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, due mainly to increased volume of mortgage loan originations of the Bank.

Amortization of intangible assets increased by $2.0 million and $696 thousand, or 280.9 percent and from none, to $2.7 million and $696 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, due to

the acquisitions in 2012 and 2013. The Company recognized impairment of intangible assets of $1.1 million by writing off all remaining trade name intangible assets of Beach, Gateway and PBOC of $976 thousand due to the merger of the Company’s two banking subsidiaries into a single bank and a portion of core deposit intangibles on savings deposits acquired from Gateway of $85 thousand due to the lower remaining balance than forecasted.

Other expenses increased by $9.9 million and $3.5 million, or 171.3 percent and 153.8 percent, to $15.6 million and $5.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the increase was due mainly to costs associated with the growth in mortgage banking activity and a $679 thousand increase in off balance sheet provision expense.

Income Tax Expense

For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, income tax expense was $7.3 million and $115 thousand, respectively, and the effective tax rate was 98.9 percent and 2.1 percent, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate increased due to increases in the valuation allowances and other permanent book tax differences.

The Company accounts for income taxes by recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities based upon temporary differences between the amounts for financial reporting purposes and tax basis of its assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more-likely-than-not that a portion or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management evaluates both positive and negative evidence, including the existence of any cumulative losses in the current year and the prior two years, the amount of taxes paid in available carry-back years, the forecasts of future income, applicable tax planning strategies, and assessments of current and future economic and business conditions. This analysis is updated quarterly and adjusted as necessary. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had a net deferred tax asset of none, net of a $17.3 million valuation allowance and as of December 31, 2012, the Company had a net deferred tax asset of $7.6 million, net of an $8.4 million valuation allowance.

The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 740-10-25 (formally FIN 48), which relates to the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements on January 1, 2007. ASC 740-10-25 prescribes a threshold and a measurement process for recognizing in the financial statements a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits. In the event we are assessed interest and/or penalties by federal or state tax authorities, such amounts will be classified in the consolidated financial statements as income tax expense. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had no accrued interest or penalties. The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to examination by U.S. Federal taxing authorities for years before 2010 (except for Gateway Bancorp’s pre-acquisition federal tax return which is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2008 and 2009 tax years). The statute of limitations for the assessment of California Franchise taxes has expired for tax years before 2009 (other state income and franchise tax statutes of limitations vary by state).

Financial Condition

Total assets increased by $1.95 billion, or 115.6 percent, to $3.63 billion at December 31, 2013, compared to $1.68 billion at December 31, 2012. The increase in total assets was due primarily to a $1.19 billion increase in net loans and leases receivable, a $603.6 million increase in loans held for sale, and a $48.6 million increase in investment securities. The increases were due mainly to the acquisition of PBOC, and organic loan growth and purchases of seasoned SFR loan pools.

Securities Available For Sale

The primary goal of our investment securities portfolio is to provide a relatively stable source of income while maintaining an appropriate level of liquidity. Investment securities provide a source of liquidity by being pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements and for certain public funds deposits. Investment securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at their estimated fair values with the corresponding changes in fair values recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, as a component of shareholders’ equity. All investment securities have been classified as available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Total investment securities available-for-sale increased by $48.6 million, or 40.0 percent, to $170.0 million at December 31, 2013, compared to $121.4 million at December 31, 2012, due mainly to acquired securities of $219.3 million from the acquisition of PBOC and $71.1 million of purchases, partially offset by $127.0 million of sales, $98.3 million of principal payments and $12.6 million of calls and pay-offs. Investment securities had a net unrealized loss of $1.5 million at December 31, 2013, compared to a net unrealized gain of $736 thousand at December 31, 2012.

The following tables summarize the amortized cost and fair value of the available-for-sale investment securities portfolio at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and the corresponding amounts of gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(In thousands)
December 31, 2013:
Available-for-sale
SBA loan pools securities	$	1,794	$	—	$	(58	)	$	1,736
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agency securities		1,928		—		(8	)		1,920
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities		14,653		135		(36	)		14,752
Agency mortgage-backed securities		153,134		299		(1,819	)		151,614

Total securities available for sale	$	171,509	$	434	$	(1,921	)	$	170,022

December 31, 2012:
Available-for-sale
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agency securities	$	2,706	$	4	$	—		$	2,710
State and Municipal securities		9,660		284		—			9,944
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities		41,499		475		(128	)		41,846
Agency mortgage-backed securities		66,818		335		(234	)		66,919

Total securities available for sale	$	120,683	$	1,098	$	(362	)	$	121,419

December 31, 2011:
Available-for-sale
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agency securities	$	4,000	$	38	$	—		$	4,038
State and Municipal securities		5,641		88		(16	)		5,713
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities		78,029		27		(1,853	)		76,203
Agency mortgage-backed securities		15,541		121		—			15,662

Total securities available for sale	$	103,211	$	274	$	(1,869	)	$	101,616

The following table summarizes the investment securities with unrealized losses at December 31, 2013 and 2012 by aggregated major security type and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position:


	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In thousands)
December 31, 2013:
Available-for-sale
SBA loan pools securities	$	1,736	$	(58	)	$	—	$	—		$	1,736	$	(58	)
U.S. government-sponsored entities		1,920		(8	)		—		—			1,920		(8	)
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities		2,064		(11	)		3,913		(25	)		5,977		(36	)
Agency mortgage-backed securities		114,104		(1,790	)		1,821		(29	)		115,925		(1,819	)

Total available-for-sale	$	119,824	$	(1,867	)	$	5,734	$	(54	)	$	125,558	$	(1,921	)

December 31, 2012:
Available-for-sale
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities	$	2,194	$	(13	)	$	10,061	$	(115	)	$	12,255	$	(128	)
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities		37,388		(234	)		—		—			37,388		(234	)

Total available-for-sale	$	39,582	$	(247	)	$	10,061	$	(115	)	$	49,643	$	(362	)

As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s securities available for sale portfolio consisted of 120 securities, 84 of which were in an unrealized loss position. The unrealized losses are related to a decrease in prepayment speeds due to an overall increase in interest rates of the agency mortgage-backed securities.

The Company’s private label residential mortgage-backed securities that are in an unrealized loss position had a fair value of $6.0 million with unrealized losses of $36 thousand at December 31, 2013. The Company’s agency residential mortgage-backed securities that are in an unrealized loss position had a fair value of $115.9 million with unrealized losses of $1.8 million at December 31, 2013.

The Company monitors to insure it has adequate credit support and as of December 31, 2013, the Company believes there is no OTTI and it does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is not likely that it will be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery. Of the Company’s $170.0 million securities portfolio, $169.8 million were rated AAA, AA or A, and $247 thousand were rated BBB based on the most recent credit rating as of December 31, 2013. The Company considers the lowest credit rating for identification of potential OTTI.

The following table presents the composition and maturities of the securities portfolio as of December 31, 2013:


	As of December 31, 2013
	One year or less				More than One Year through Five Years					More than Five Years through Ten Years					More than Ten Years					Total
	Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield		Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield
	($ in thousands)
Available-for-sale
SBA loan pools securities	$	—		—	$	—		—		$	—		—		$	1,794		2.68	%	$	1,794	$	1,736		2.68	%
U.S. government-sponsored entities and agency securities		—		—		—		—			1,928		2.35	%		—		—			1,928		1,920		2.35	%
Private label residential mortgage-backed securities		—		—		1,811		4.03	%		800		3.66	%		12,042		2.72	%		14,653		14,752		2.93	%
Agency mortgage-backed securities		—		—		6		1.33	%		25,459		1.76	%		127,669		2.21	%		153,134		151,614		2.13	%

Total securities available for sale	$	—		—	$	1,817		4.03	%	$	28,187		1.86	%	$	141,505		2.26	%	$	171,509	$	170,022		2.21	%

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale amounted to $716.7 million at December 31, 2013 compared to $113.2 million at December 31, 2012. The loans held for sale of $716.7 million was composed of $192.6 million at fair value and $524.1 million at lower of cost or fair value.

The loans at fair value represent conforming single family residential mortgage loans originated by the Bank that are expected to be sold into the secondary market on a whole loan basis. Certain of these loans are expected to be sold to the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae on a servicing retained basis. The servicing of these loans is performed by a third party sub-servicer. These loans increased by $79.5 million to $192.6 million due to originations of $1.94 billion, partially offset by sales of $1.86 billion, principal payments of $2.2 million, and $2.8 million changes in fair value and other adjustments.

During 2013, the Company also strategically transferred certain loans from loans and leases receivable to loans held for sale at lower of cost or fair value and sold them in pools, unlike the loans individually originated to be sold into the secondary market on a whole loan basis. These loans totaled $524.1 million at December 31, 2013, due mainly to loans transferred from loans and leases held for investment of $181.4 million, net of $1.4 million of allowance for loan and leases transferred, and originations of $442.0 million, partially offset by sales of $106.6 million and other net amortizations. Starting with the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company began originating these certain loans directly into the held for sale status.

Loans and Leases Receivable

Loan and lease receivables, net of allowance for loan and lease receivable, increased by $1.19 billion, or 96.7 percent, to $2.43 billion at December 31, 2013 from $1.23 billion at December 31, 2012. This increase was due primarily to the acquisition of PBOC and the purchases of seasoned SFR mortgage loan pools during the year.

Compositions of Loans and Leases Receivable

The following table presents the composition of the Company’s loan and lease portfolio as of the dates indicated:


	As of December 31,
	2013						2012						2011						2010						2009
	Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent
	($ in thousands)
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial	$	287,771			11.8	%	$	80,387			6.4	%	$	9,019			1.1	%	$	6,743			1.0	%	$	6,782			0.9	%
Real estate mortgage		529,883			21.7	%		338,900			27.1	%		125,830			16.0	%		61,314			8.9	%		63,885			8.4	%
Multi-family		141,580			5.8	%		115,082			9.2	%		87,196			11.1	%		32,911			4.8	%		34,100			4.5	%
SBA		27,428			1.1	%		36,076			2.9	%		—			—			—			—			—			—
Construction		24,933			1.0	%		6,623			0.5	%		—			—			—			—			—			—
Lease financing		31,949			1.3	%		11,203			0.9	%		—			—			—			—			—			—
Consumer:
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage		1,286,541			52.6	%		638,667			51.3	%		548,522			69.5	%		570,892			82.3	%		635,634			83.4	%
Other HELOC’s, home equity loans, and other consumer installment credit		116,026			4.7	%		21,533			1.7	%		17,822			2.3	%		20,952			3.0	%		20,981			2.8	%

Total Loans		2,446,111			100.0	%		1,248,471			100.0	%		788,389			100.0	%		692,812			100.0	%		761,382			100.0	%
Allowance for loan losses		(18,805	)					(14,448	)					(12,780	)					(14,637	)					(13,079	)

Total Loans and leases receivable, net	$	2,427,306					$	1,234,023					$	775,609					$	678,175					$	748,303

The following table presents the contractual maturity and repricing information with weighted average contractual yield of the loan and lease portfolio as of December 31, 2013:


	One year or less					More than One Year through Five Years					More than Five Years through Ten Years					More than Ten Years					Total
	Amount		Weighted Average Yield			Amount		Weighted Average Yield			Amount		Weighted Average Yield			Amount		Weighted Average Yield			Amount		Weighted Average Yield
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial		246,979		3.72	%		23,952		4.80	%		16,840		3.60	%		—		—			287,771		3.80	%
Real estate mortgage		166,914		4.67	%		213,407		4.86	%		137,915		4.71	%		11,647		5.13	%		529,883		4.76	%
Multi-family		41,229		4.69	%		64,060		4.79	%		34,617		5.03	%		1,674		5.20	%		141,580		4.82	%
SBA		25,385		5.42	%		185		8.65	%		1,453		6.06	%		405		5.93	%		27,428		5.48	%
Construction		23,794		4.67	%		—		—			—		—			1,139		3.60	%		24,933		4.62	%
Lease financing		2,035		7.86	%		27,650		8.08	%		2,264		—			—		—			31,949		7.50	%
Consumer:
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage		578,355		3.57	%		341,108		3.15	%		50,294		4.14	%		316,784		5.32	%		1,286,541		3.91	%
Other HELOC’s, home equity loans, and other consumer installment credit		113,875		3.68	%		224		4.91	%		1,432		4.33	%		495		13.94	%		116,026		3.74	%

Total Loans		1,198,566		3.87	%		670,586		4.12	%		244,815		4.52	%		332,144		5.32	%		2,446,111		4.20	%

Includes demand loans and leases, loans and leases having no stated maturity and overdraft loans

The following table presents the interest rate profile of the loan and lease portfolio due after one year at December 31, 2013:


	Due After One Year
	Fixed Rate		Floating Rate		Total
	(In thousands)
December 31, 2013:
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial	$	36,356	$	119,744	$	156,100
Real estate mortgage		294,262		195,663		489,925
Multi-family		69,461		62,752		132,213
SBA		2,041		25,294		27,335
Construction		1,139		9,898		11,037
Lease financing		29,914		—		29,914
Consumer:
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage		333,928		945,983		1,279,911
HELOC’s, home equity loans, and other consumer installment credit		2,152		93,017		95,169

Total Loans	$	769,253	$	1,452,351	$	2,221,604

Loan and Lease Originations, Purchases and Repayments

The Company originates real estate secured loans primarily through its retail channel under its DBA Banc Home Loans and under the Bank’s name, and through its wholesale and correspondent channels through other mortgage brokers and banking relationships. Loans originated are either: eligible for sale to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, government insured FHA or VA, held by the Company, or sold to private investors.

The Company also originates consumer and real estate loans on a direct basis through our marketing efforts and our existing and walk-in customers. The Company originates both adjustable and fixed-rate loans, however, the ability to originate loans is dependent upon customer demand for loans in our market areas. Demand is affected by competition and the interest rate environment. During the last few years, the Company has significantly increased origination of ARM loans. The Company has also purchased ARM loans secured by one-to-four family residences and participations in construction and commercial real estate loans in the past. Loans and participations purchased must conform to the Company’s underwriting guidelines or guidelines acceptable to the management loan committee.

The following table presents loan and lease originations, purchases, sales, and repayment activities excluding the conforming residential mortgage loans originated for sale, for the periods indicated:


	For the year ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011
	(In thousands)
Originations by type:
Adjustable rate:
Real Estate - one- to four- family	$	390,499		$	183,343		$	44,554
Commercial real estate and multi-family		120,631			72,142			12,826
SBA		1,474			5,216			—
Construction		6,226			16,961			—
Consumer and other		21,282			5,268			64,851
Commercial and industrial		81,048			32,329			—

Total adjustable rate		621,160			315,259			122,231
Fixed rate:
Real Estate - one- to four- family		3,464			2,382			—
Commercial real estate and multi-family		117,666			95,640			76,299
SBA		772			2,970			—
Construction		1,136			—			—
Consumer and other		307			150			97
Commercial and industrial		10,962			2,103			493
Lease financing		16,952			—			—

Total fixed rate		151,259			103,245			76,889

Total loans originated		772,419			418,504			199,120

Purchases:
Real Estate - one- to four- family		849,883			66,718			—
Multi-family		—			18,674			58,027
Construction		—			—			—
Lease financing		7,850			14,487			—
Consumer and other		—			—			—
Commercial and industrial		—			—			—

Total loans purchased		857,733			99,879			58,027

Acquired in business combination		385,256			288,285			—
Transferred to loans held for sale		(182,803	)
Repayments:
Principal repayments		(461,223	)		(276,399	)		(162,700	)
Sales		(263,554	)		(70,438	)		—
Increase (decrease) in other items, net		89,812			(1,417	)		2,987

Net increase (decrease)	$	1,197,640		$	458,414		$	97,434

Seasoned SFR Mortgage Loan Acquisition

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company completed five seasoned SFR mortgage loan pool acquisitions with unpaid principal balances and fair values of $1.02 billion and $849.9 million (excluding accrued interest paid and acquisition costs at settlement) at their respective acquisition dates and $814.0 million and $711.1 million at December 31, 2013. These loan pools generally consist of re-performing residential mortgage loans whose characteristics and payment history were consistent with borrowers that demonstrated a willingness and ability to remain in the residence pursuant to the current terms of the mortgage loan agreement.

The Company was able to acquire these loans at a significant discount to both current property value at acquisition and note balance. The Company determined that certain loans in these seasoned SFR mortgage loan acquisitions reflect credit quality deterioration since origination and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected. The unpaid principal balances and fair values of these loans at the respective dates of acquisition were $473.9 million and $342.1 million, respectively. At December 31, 2013, the unpaid principal balance and carrying value of these loans were $326.0 million and $261.3 million, respectively.

For each acquisition the Company was able to utilize its background in mortgage credit analysis to re-underwrite the borrower’s credit to arrive at what it believes to be an attractive risk adjusted return for a highly collateralized investment in performing mortgage loans. The acquisition program implemented and executed by the Company involved a multifaceted due diligence process that included compliance reviews, title analyses, review of modification agreements, updated property valuation assessments, collateral inventory and other undertakings related to the scope of due diligence. In aggregate, the purchase price of the loans was less than 61.1 percent of current property value at the time of acquisition based on a third party broker price opinion, and less than 83.1 percent of note balance at the time of acquisition. At the time of acquisition, approximately 86.3 percent of the mortgage loans by current principal balance (excluding any forbearance amounts) had the original terms modified at some point since origination by a prior owner or servicer. The mortgage loans had a current weighted average interest rate of 4.39 percent, determined by current principal balance. The weighted average credit score of the borrowers comprising the mortgage loans at or near the time of acquisition determined by current principal balance and excluding those with no credit score on file was 655. The average property value determined by a broker price opinion obtained by third party licensed real estate professionals at or around the time of acquisition was $292 thousand. Approximately 89.6 percent of the borrowers by current principal balance had made at least 12 monthly payments in the 12 months preceding the trade date (or, in some cases calculated as making 11 monthly payments in the 11 months preceding the trade date), and 94.0 percent had made nine monthly payments in the nine months preceding the trade date. The mortgage loans are secured by residences located in all 50 states and Washington DC, with California being the largest state concentration representing 36.3 percent of the note balance, and with no other state concentration exceeding 10.0 percent based upon the current note balance.

During the course of 2012, the Company completed three seasoned SFR loan acquisitions with unpaid principal balances and fair values of $114.8 million and $66.7 million at the respective acquisition dates. These loan pools generally consist of re-performing residential mortgage loans whose characteristics and payment history were consistent with borrowers that demonstrated a willingness and ability to remain in the residence pursuant to the current terms of the mortgage loan agreement. In aggregate, the purchase price of the loans was less than 70 percent of current property value at the time of acquisition based on a third party broker price opinion, and less than 60 percent of note balance at the time of acquisition. The mortgage loans had a current weighted average interest rate of 4.13 percent, determined by current unpaid principal balance. The weighted average credit score of the borrowers comprising the mortgage loans at or near the time of acquisition determined by current principal balance and excluding those with no credit score on file was 632. The average property value determined by a broker price opinion obtained by third party licensed real estate professionals at or around the time of acquisition was $252 thousand. As of December 31, 2013, the unpaid principal balance and carrying value of these loans were $88.0 million and $53.2 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, approximately 5.63 percent and 6.00 percent of unpaid principal balance of these loans were delinquent 60 or more days and 1.37 percent and 0.23 percent respectively were in bankruptcy or foreclosure. During the year ended December 31, 2013, delinquencies on seasoned SFR loan pools increased due to additional acquisitions as well as a transfer of servicing during the fourth quarter of 2013. A servicing transfer often causes a temporary increase in delinquencies due to confusion of some borrowers concerning where to send their payments and a disruption in the normal collection efforts of the loan servicer.

The following table presents the outstanding balance and carrying amount of PCI loans and leases as of dates indicated:

As of December 31,

2013

2012

Outstanding
Balance

Carrying
Amount

Outstanding
Balance

Carrying
Amount

(In thousands)

Commercial: