Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 1, 2007
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 0-25123
P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
86-0815086
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
7676 East Pinnacle Peak Road
Scottsdale, Arizona
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
85255
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(480) 888-3000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports, and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of July 1, 2007, there were 25,805,649 outstanding shares of the registrants Common
Stock.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements |
P.F. CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
9,469 |
|
|
$ |
31,589 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
4,349 |
|
|
|
4,232 |
|
Prepaids and other current assets |
|
|
24,373 |
|
|
|
28,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
38,191 |
|
|
|
64,816 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
467,324 |
|
|
|
421,770 |
|
Deferred income tax assets |
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
6,819 |
|
|
|
6,819 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
20,939 |
|
|
|
12,644 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
9,440 |
|
|
|
7,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
544,462 |
|
|
$ |
514,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
11,902 |
|
|
$ |
15,255 |
|
Construction payable |
|
|
14,526 |
|
|
|
9,075 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
58,302 |
|
|
|
55,848 |
|
Unearned revenue |
|
|
13,254 |
|
|
|
18,226 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt, including $3,289 and $3,542 due to
related parties at July 1, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
6,415 |
|
|
|
5,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
104,399 |
|
|
|
103,891 |
|
Long-term debt, including $3,015 and $588 due to related parties at July
1, 2007 and December 31, 2006 respectively |
|
|
14,779 |
|
|
|
13,723 |
|
Lease obligation |
|
|
79,316 |
|
|
|
71,682 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
20,334 |
|
|
|
33,315 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized:
25,805,649 shares and 25,373,019 shares issued and outstanding at July
1, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
189,142 |
|
|
|
174,101 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,397,261 shares outstanding at July 1, 2007
and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
(46,373 |
) |
|
|
(46,373 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
181,512 |
|
|
|
161,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
|
324,308 |
|
|
|
289,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
544,462 |
|
|
$ |
514,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
P.F. CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
267,409 |
|
|
$ |
225,981 |
|
|
$ |
531,815 |
|
|
$ |
454,594 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
73,011 |
|
|
|
61,285 |
|
|
|
145,926 |
|
|
|
124,725 |
|
Labor |
|
|
90,665 |
|
|
|
75,380 |
|
|
|
179,899 |
|
|
|
152,317 |
|
Operating |
|
|
42,436 |
|
|
|
36,210 |
|
|
|
83,630 |
|
|
|
71,051 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
15,615 |
|
|
|
12,725 |
|
|
|
30,523 |
|
|
|
25,218 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
15,806 |
|
|
|
14,037 |
|
|
|
32,528 |
|
|
|
27,289 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,606 |
|
|
|
10,565 |
|
|
|
26,285 |
|
|
|
20,920 |
|
Preopening expense |
|
|
3,296 |
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
5,836 |
|
|
|
4,511 |
|
Partner investment expense |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
(1,869 |
) |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
253,967 |
|
|
|
213,944 |
|
|
|
502,758 |
|
|
|
427,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
13,442 |
|
|
|
12,037 |
|
|
|
29,057 |
|
|
|
27,438 |
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest and
provision for income taxes |
|
|
13,621 |
|
|
|
12,605 |
|
|
|
29,579 |
|
|
|
28,498 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
(2,033 |
) |
|
|
(2,768 |
) |
|
|
(4,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
10,572 |
|
|
|
26,811 |
|
|
|
24,443 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(3,223 |
) |
|
|
(2,483 |
) |
|
|
(7,069 |
) |
|
|
(6,541 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,277 |
|
|
$ |
8,089 |
|
|
$ |
19,742 |
|
|
$ |
17,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
25,708 |
|
|
|
26,546 |
|
|
|
25,598 |
|
|
|
26,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
26,129 |
|
|
|
27,258 |
|
|
|
26,088 |
|
|
|
27,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
P.F. CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
19,742 |
|
|
$ |
17,902 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
26,285 |
|
|
|
20,920 |
|
Equity based compensation |
|
|
4,797 |
|
|
|
4,751 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(811 |
) |
|
|
(4,219 |
) |
Partner investment expense |
|
|
(1,869 |
) |
|
|
1,125 |
|
Partner bonus expense, imputed |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
Tax benefit from disqualifying stock option
dispositions credited to equity |
|
|
(4,136 |
) |
|
|
(1,365 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
2,768 |
|
|
|
4,055 |
|
Other |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
Prepaids and other current assets |
|
|
7,064 |
|
|
|
3,082 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(1,774 |
) |
|
|
(326 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(3,353 |
) |
|
|
(4,086 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
Lease obligation |
|
|
7,711 |
|
|
|
3,224 |
|
Unearned revenue |
|
|
(4,972 |
) |
|
|
(4,597 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
54,490 |
|
|
|
46,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(64,371 |
) |
|
|
(41,782 |
) |
Purchase of minority interests |
|
|
(9,461 |
) |
|
|
(1,214 |
) |
Capitalized interest |
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
(421 |
) |
Purchase of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,835 |
) |
Sale of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(74,583 |
) |
|
|
(45,597 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(14,293 |
) |
|
|
(4,409 |
) |
Proceeds from stock options exercised and employee
stock purchases |
|
|
6,108 |
|
|
|
2,859 |
|
Borrowings on credit facility |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to minority partners |
|
|
(4,128 |
) |
|
|
(5,069 |
) |
Tax benefit from disqualifying stock option
dispositions credited to equity |
|
|
4,136 |
|
|
|
1,365 |
|
Proceeds from minority partners contributions |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
Payments of capital lease obligation |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
Purchase of subsidiary common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(2,027 |
) |
|
|
(12,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(22,120 |
) |
|
|
(11,236 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
|
|
31,589 |
|
|
|
31,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
|
$ |
9,469 |
|
|
$ |
20,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
982 |
|
|
$ |
661 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
7,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of minority interests through issuance of
long-term-debt and conversion to members capital |
|
$ |
10,276 |
|
|
$ |
(333 |
) |
Change in construction payable |
|
|
5,451 |
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Business and Basis of Presentation
As of July 1, 2007, P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc. (the Company) owned and operated 157 full
service restaurants throughout the United States under the name of P.F. Changs China Bistro. The
Company also owned and operated 126 quick casual restaurants under the name of Pei Wei Asian
Diner and one full service restaurant under the name Taneko Japanese Tavern.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of
the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating
results for the three and six month periods ended July 1, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the year ending December 30, 2007.
The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes
required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company grants stock options for a fixed number of shares to certain employees and directors
with an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair value of the shares at the date of grant.
The Company also grants restricted stock with a fair value determined based on the Companys
closing stock price on the date of grant. On January 2, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions
of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS)
No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS 123R), Share-Based Payment, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107
(SAB 107), Share-Based Payment, requiring the measurement and recognition of all share-based
compensation under the fair value method. The Company implemented SFAS 123R using the modified
prospective transition method, which does not result in the restatement of previously issued
financial statements.
The fair value for options granted during the three and six months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2,
2006 was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
July 1, 2007 |
|
July 2, 2006 |
|
July 1, 2007 |
|
July 2, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
Expected life of options (years)
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Expected stock volatility
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
The estimated fair value of share-based compensation plans and other options is amortized to
expense over the vesting period. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further
discussion of the Companys share-based employee compensation.
5
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157
provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The standard expands
required disclosures about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair
value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on
earnings. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157 on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxesan interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that the Company recognize the impact of a tax
position in the Companys financial statements if that position is more likely than not to be
sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with the cumulative effect of the
change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The adoption
of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements. See
Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the Companys adoption of
FIN 48.
In May 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FIN 48-1, Definition of Settlement in FASB
Interpretation No. 48 (the FSP). The FSP provides guidance about how an enterprise should
determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously
unrecognized tax benefits. Under the FSP, a tax position could be effectively settled on
completion of examination by a taxing authority if the entity does not intend to appeal or litigate
the result and it is remote that the taxing authority would examine or re-examine the tax position.
Application of the FSP shall be upon the initial adoption date of FIN 48. The FSP did not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In March 2006, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force issued Issue 06-3 (EITF 06-3), How Sales Taxes
Collected From Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income
Statement. A tentative consensus was reached that a company should disclose its accounting policy
(i.e., gross or net presentation) regarding presentation of taxes within the scope of EITF 06-3. If
taxes are significant and reported on a gross basis, a company should disclose the amount of such
taxes for each period for which an income statement is presented. The guidance is effective for
periods beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company presents sales tax on a net basis in its
consolidated financial statements.
2. Net Income Per Share
Net income per share is computed in accordance with SFAS 128, Earnings per Share. Basic net income
per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed based on the weighted average number of
shares of common stock and potentially dilutive securities, which includes options outstanding
under the Companys stock option plans. For the three months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006,
1.6 million and 1.7 million, respectively, of the Companys shares were excluded from the
calculation due to their anti-dilutive effect. For the six months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2,
2006, 1.5 million and 1.2 million, respectively, of the Companys shares were excluded from the
calculation due to their anti-dilutive effect.
3. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, gross |
|
$ |
23,433 |
|
|
$ |
14,343 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(2,494 |
) |
|
|
(1,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
20,939 |
|
|
$ |
12,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets as of July 1, 2007 include additional intangible assets recognized upon the
Companys buyout of minority partner interests when the Companys purchase price exceeded the
imputed fair value at the time of the original investment.
6
4. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll |
|
$ |
17,094 |
|
|
$ |
18,099 |
|
Sales and use tax payable |
|
|
6,084 |
|
|
|
6,531 |
|
Property tax payable |
|
|
3,751 |
|
|
|
3,159 |
|
Accrued insurance |
|
|
15,230 |
|
|
|
13,701 |
|
Accrued rent |
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
3,708 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
12,704 |
|
|
|
10,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses |
|
$ |
58,302 |
|
|
$ |
55,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Credit Facility
On August 4, 2006, the Company entered into a credit agreement with a commercial lending
institution which allows for borrowings of up to $50.0 million at an interest rate of 50 basis
points over the applicable London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The revolving credit facility
expires on August 4, 2011 and contains certain restrictions and conditions which require the
Company to maintain a maximum adjusted leverage ratio of 2.25:1 and a minimum fixed-charge coverage
ratio of 1.25:1. The Company was in compliance with these restrictions and conditions as of July 1,
2007. As of July 1, 2007, the Company had borrowings outstanding under the credit facility totaling
$10.0 million with an average interest rate of 6.0% as well as $9.7 million committed for the
issuance of a letter of credit, which is required by insurance companies for the Companys workers
compensation and general liability insurance programs. Available borrowings under the line of
credit were $30.3 million as of July 1, 2007.
6. Share-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation expense includes compensation expense, recognized over the applicable
vesting periods, for new share-based awards and for share-based awards granted prior to, but not
yet vested as of, the Companys adoption of SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment on
January 2, 2006. At July 1, 2007, non-vested share-based compensation, net of estimated
forfeitures, totaled $18.0 million for stock options and $2.0 million for restricted stock. This
expense will be recognized over the remaining weighted average vesting period which is
approximately 2.4 years for stock options and 2.1 years for restricted stock.
Reported share-based compensation is classified as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
July 1, 2007 |
|
|
July 2, 2006 |
|
|
July 1, 2007 |
|
|
July 2, 2006 |
|
Labor |
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
$ |
716 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
2,189 |
|
|
|
4,388 |
|
|
|
4,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation |
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
4,797 |
|
|
|
4,751 |
|
Less: tax benefit |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
(711 |
) |
|
|
(1,319 |
) |
|
|
(1,318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation, net of tax |
|
$ |
1,798 |
|
|
$ |
1,850 |
|
|
$ |
3,478 |
|
|
$ |
3,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Income Taxes
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation,
the Company recognized no material adjustment to the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits
that existed as of December 31, 2006. At the date of adoption, the Company had $2.1 million of
unrecognized tax benefits, all of which would impact the Companys effective tax rate if
recognized. As of July 1, 2007, the Company had $1.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits.
It is the Companys policy to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions
in income tax expense. As of both the date of adoption and July 1, 2007, the Company had accrued
$0.2 million of interest and $0.1 million of penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
7
8. Segment Reporting
The Company operates exclusively in the food service industry and has determined that its
reportable segments are those that are based on the Companys methods of internal reporting and
management structure. The Companys reportable segments are Bistro and Pei Wei. During fiscal 2006,
the Company opened Taneko Japanese Tavern, a new full service restaurant located in Scottsdale,
Arizona, which is reported within Shared Services and Other. There were no material amounts of
revenues or transfers among reportable segments.
The table below presents information about reportable segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shared Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Bistro |
|
|
Pei Wei |
|
For the Three Months Ended July 1, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
267,409 |
|
|
$ |
586 |
|
|
$ |
208,174 |
|
|
$ |
58,649 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
(7,581 |
) |
|
|
20,044 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
35,686 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
25,180 |
|
|
|
10,414 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,606 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
10,054 |
|
|
|
3,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended July 2, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
225,981 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
183,705 |
|
|
$ |
42,276 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
10,572 |
|
|
|
(6,095 |
) |
|
|
17,124 |
|
|
|
(457 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
24,380 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
15,429 |
|
|
|
7,990 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,565 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
8,220 |
|
|
|
2,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended July 1, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
531,815 |
|
|
$ |
1,308 |
|
|
$ |
415,202 |
|
|
$ |
115,305 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
26,811 |
|
|
|
(15,537 |
) |
|
|
42,056 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
64,371 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
45,476 |
|
|
|
18,760 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
26,285 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
19,537 |
|
|
|
5,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended July 2, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
454,594 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
370,629 |
|
|
$ |
83,965 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
24,443 |
|
|
|
(11,747 |
) |
|
|
35,431 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
41,782 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
27,210 |
|
|
|
13,234 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
20,920 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
16,316 |
|
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of July 1, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
544,462 |
|
|
$ |
33,175 |
|
|
$ |
408,538 |
|
|
$ |
102,749 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
6,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,566 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
514,045 |
|
|
$ |
29,755 |
|
|
$ |
395,263 |
|
|
$ |
89,027 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
6,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,566 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
9. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is engaged in various legal actions, which arise in the ordinary course of its
business. The Company is also currently under examination by various taxing authorities for
calendar years 2003 through 2005. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate
disposition of these matters, it is the opinion of the Companys management, based upon the
information available at this time, that the expected outcome of these matters, individually or in
the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, liquidity or
financial condition of the Company.
10. Subsequent Event
In July 2007, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $50.0
million of the Companys outstanding shares of common stock from time to time in the open market or
in private at prevailing market prices over the next two years. The Company intends to use cash on
hand and available credit lines to repurchase shares.
8
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
This information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report and the audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 contained in our 2006
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Some of the statements in this section contain forwardlooking statements, which involve risks and
uncertainties. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as may,
will, should, expect, plan, intend, forecast, anticipate, believe, estimate, predict, potential,
continue or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. The forward-looking
statements contained in this section involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and situations
that may cause our or our industrys actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements
to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by these statements. Factors that might cause actual events or results to
differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements may include the matters
listed under Risk Factors in Item 1A (a detailed description of which can be found under the
caption Risk Factors in our most recently filed form 10-K) and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q,
including, but not limited to, failure of our existing or new restaurants to achieve predicted
results, the inability to develop and construct our restaurants within projected budgets and time
periods and our ability to successfully expand our operations. Because we cannot guarantee future
results, levels of activity, performance or achievements, you should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements.
Overview
We own and operate three restaurant concepts in the Asian niche: P.F. Changs China Bistro
(Bistro), Pei Wei Asian Diner (Pei Wei) and Taneko Japanese Tavern (Taneko).
Bistro
As of July 1, 2007, we owned and operated 157 full service Bistro restaurants that feature a blend
of high quality, traditional Chinese cuisine with attentive service and American hospitality in a
sophisticated, contemporary bistro setting. P.F. Changs was formed in early 1996 with the
acquisition of the four original Bistro restaurants and the hiring of an experienced management
team. Utilizing a partnership management philosophy, we embarked on a strategic expansion of the
concept targeted at major metropolitan areas throughout the United States. We own and operate all
of our restaurants with the exception of a Bistro restaurant located in Honolulu, Hawaii which
opened in September 2006 under a joint venture arrangement in which we own a minority interest.
We intend to open 19 new Bistros during fiscal 2007, five of which were open by the end of the
second quarter of 2007. We will continue our development in existing markets and plan to enter
eight new markets in 2007. We have signed lease agreements for all of our development planned for
fiscal 2007. We intend to continue to develop Bistro restaurants that typically range in size from
6,000 to 7,500 square feet, and that require, on average, a total cash investment of approximately
$2.8 million to $3.0 million and total invested capital of approximately $4.0 million per
restaurant (net of estimated landlord reimbursements). This total capitalized investment includes
the capitalized lease value of the property, which can vary greatly depending on the specific trade
area. Preopening expenses are expected to average approximately $415,000 per restaurant during
2007, which includes approximately $50,000 per restaurant in preopening rent.
Pei Wei
As of July 1, 2007, we owned and operated 126 quick casual Pei Wei restaurants that offer a modest
menu of freshly prepared, high quality Asian cuisine served in a relaxed, warm environment offering
attentive counter service and take-out flexibility. Pei Wei opened its first unit in July 2000 in
the Phoenix, Arizona area and has expanded significantly since then.
We intend to open 37 Pei Wei restaurants in 2007, 19 of which were open by the end of the second
quarter of 2007. We will continue our development in existing markets and plan to enter nine new
markets in 2007. We have signed lease agreements for all of our development planned for fiscal
2007. Our Pei Wei restaurants are generally 2,800 to 3,400 square feet in size and require an
average total cash investment of approximately $750,000 to $850,000 and total invested capital of
approximately $1.4 million per restaurant (net of estimated landlord reimbursements). Preopening
expenses are expected to average approximately $140,000 per restaurant during 2007, which includes
approximately $27,000 per restaurant in preopening rent.
9
Taneko
On October 2, 2006, we opened our first Taneko restaurant in Scottsdale, Arizona, featuring
natural, organic and seasonal ingredients highlighting the diverse cooking styles of Japan.
Inspired by izakayas, or local taverns, Taneko offers an extensive variety of food and beverages in
a comfortable atmosphere.
Change in Partnership Structure
We utilize a partnership philosophy to facilitate the development, leadership and operation of our
restaurants. Historically, this philosophy was embodied in a traditional legal partnership
structure, which included capital contributions from our partners in exchange for an ownership
stake in the profits and losses of our restaurants. Effective January 2007 for new store openings,
the Bistro began employing a different structure to achieve the same goal. At the restaurant
level, our Operating and Culinary Partners (still partners in the philosophical, but not legal
sense) no longer have a direct ownership stake in the profits and losses of a restaurant, but are
instead eligible to receive monthly incentive payments based upon the profitability of the
restaurant, as well as participate in an incentive program that rewards long-term improvements in
the operating performance of the restaurant. As a result of these changes, awards made to the
individuals participating in the new plan are classified as compensation rather than as minority
interest expense. Accordingly, compensation expense for our Operating and Culinary Partners is
reflected in the consolidated income statement as Labor Expense. Additionally, a similar structure
exists for our Market Partners and Regional Vice Presidents, with related compensation reflected as
General and Administrative Expense in the consolidated income statement. Partner investment
expense is no longer recognized for new Bistro restaurant openings beginning in 2007 as a result of
this change. Additionally, many existing legal partners have requested an early buyout of their
partnership interest as a result of their desire to participate in the new plan, the financial
impact of which is discussed under Partner Investment Expense in Results of Operations.
The Pei Wei partnership structure is not affected by the changes at the Bistro and the traditional
partnership structure remains in effect for new Pei Wei restaurant openings during 2007.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies are those that require significant judgment. There have been no
material changes to the critical accounting policies previously reported in our 2006 Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Results of Operations
The following tables set forth certain unaudited quarterly information for the three and six month
periods ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006, respectively. This quarterly information has been
prepared on a basis consistent with the audited financial statements and, in the opinion of
management, includes all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair presentation of the information for the periods presented. P.F. Changs quarterly operating
results may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, and operating results for
any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for a full fiscal year.
One of the factors that has in the past caused fluctuations in our operating results is preopening
expenses. Historically, we have experienced variability in the amount and percentage of revenues
attributable to preopening expenses. We typically incur the most significant portion of preopening
expenses associated with a given restaurant within the two months immediately preceding, and the
month of, the opening of the restaurant. Additionally, there may be variability in the amount and
percentage of revenues attributable to partner investment expense as a result of the timing of
opening new Pei Wei restaurants and the timing of purchasing partner interests. Partner investment
expense generally represents the difference between the imputed fair value of our partners
ownership interests and our partners cash capital contribution for these interests.
In addition, our experience to date has been that labor and operating costs associated with a newly
opened restaurant for the first several months of operation are materially greater than what can be
expected after that time, both in aggregate dollars and as a percentage of revenues. Accordingly,
the volume and timing of new restaurant openings has had and is expected to continue to have, a
meaningful impact on preopening expenses, labor, operating and partner investment costs until such
time as a larger base of restaurants in operation mitigates such impact.
10
Results for the three months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006
Our consolidated operating results for the three months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006 were as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
267,409 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
225,981 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
41,428 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
73,011 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
61,285 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
11,726 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
% |
Labor |
|
|
90,665 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
% |
|
|
75,380 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
% |
|
|
15,285 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
% |
Operating |
|
|
42,436 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
36,210 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
6,226 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
15,615 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
12,725 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
2,890 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
15,806 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
14,037 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13,606 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
10,565 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
3,041 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
% |
Preopening expense |
|
|
3,296 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
Partner investment expense |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
%) |
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
(1,393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
253,967 |
|
|
|
95.0 |
% |
|
|
213,944 |
|
|
|
94.7 |
% |
|
|
40,023 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
13,442 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
12,037 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
(68.5 |
%) |
Minority interest |
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
%) |
|
|
(2,033 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
%) |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
(44.9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
10,572 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
1,928 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(3,223 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
%) |
|
|
(2,483 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
%) |
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,277 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
$ |
8,089 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain percentage amounts do not sum to total due to rounding. Percentages over 100% not displayed.
Operating results for the Bistro for the three months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006 were
as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
208,174 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
183,705 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
24,469 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
56,696 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
49,810 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
6,886 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
% |
Labor |
|
|
69,827 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
% |
|
|
60,753 |
|
|
|
33.1 |
% |
|
|
9,074 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
% |
Operating |
|
|
32,194 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
28,653 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
3,541 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
11,598 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
9,928 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
5,907 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
5,319 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,054 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
8,220 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
1,834 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
% |
Preopening expense |
|
|
1,790 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
% |
Partner investment expense |
|
|
(753 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
%) |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
(1,323 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
187,313 |
|
|
|
90.0 |
% |
|
|
164,828 |
|
|
|
89.7 |
% |
|
|
22,485 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
20,861 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
18,877 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(837 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
%) |
|
|
(1,753 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
%) |
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
(52.3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes |
|
$ |
20,044 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
$ |
17,124 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
$ |
2,920 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain percentage amounts do not sum to total due to rounding. Percentages over 100% not
displayed.
11
Operating results for Pei Wei for the three months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006 were as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
58,649 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
42,276 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
16,373 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
16,070 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
11,475 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
4,595 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
% |
Labor |
|
|
20,480 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
|
14,627 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
% |
|
|
5,853 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
% |
Operating |
|
|
10,004 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
7,557 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
3,963 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
41.7 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
2,878 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
2,485 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,164 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
2,064 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
53.3 |
% |
Preopening expense |
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
% |
Partner investment expense |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(19.7 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
58,350 |
|
|
|
99.5 |
% |
|
|
42,486 |
|
|
|
100.5 |
% |
|
|
15,864 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(33.3 |
%) |
Minority interest |
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
%) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
$ |
(457 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
%) |
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain percentage amounts do not sum to total due to rounding. Percentages over 100% not
displayed.
Revenues
Our revenues are derived primarily from food and beverage sales. Each segment contributed to
current year revenue growth as follows:
Bistro: The increase in revenues was attributable to revenues of $24.4 million generated by the
20 new Bistro restaurants that opened during the first half of 2007 and the second half of 2006,
partially offset by a slight net decrease in revenues for restaurants that opened prior to the
second quarter of 2006. An effective price increase of approximately 2-3% impacted all
restaurants and also contributed to the increase in revenues. Such increases were partially
offset by a decline in overall guest traffic during the second quarter of fiscal 2007.
Pei Wei: The increase in revenues was attributable to revenues of $14.3 million generated by the
38 new Pei Wei restaurants that opened during the first half of 2007 and the second half of 2006
and a $2.0 million increase in revenues for restaurants that opened prior to the second quarter
of 2006. An effective price increase of approximately 1-2% impacting all restaurants and a slight
increase in overall guest traffic also contributed to the increase in revenues.
In addition to the revenues earned by Bistro and Pei Wei, consolidated revenues include $0.6
million of revenues generated by our Taneko concept.
Costs and Expenses
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales is comprised of the cost of food and beverages. Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro increased slightly due to an
adjustment resulting from a modification of our accounting policy related to rebate accruals
during the second quarter of 2006. Excluding this adjustment,
cost of sales as a percentage of revenues decreased slightly primarily due to lower pork and
seafood expense resulting from favorable pricing, improved yields and increased purchasing
through national distribution contracts, partially offset by slightly higher poultry prices and
increased produce expense.
12
Pei Wei: Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei increased due to an adjustment
resulting from a modification of our accounting policy related to rebate accruals during the
second quarter of 2006. Excluding this adjustment, cost of sales as a percentage of revenues
decreased slightly primarily due to lower pork expense resulting from favorable pricing and
yields partially offset by higher poultry costs.
Labor
Labor expenses consist of restaurant management salaries, hourly staff payroll costs, other
payroll-related items and imputed partner bonus expense. Imputed partner bonus expense represents
the portion of restaurant level operating results that are allocable to minority partners, but are
presented as bonus expense for accounting purposes. Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Labor expenses as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro increased primarily due to
higher management incentive costs principally resulting from the 2007 change in the Bistro
partnership structure as well as wage rate pressure across all labor categories. The impact of
these factors was partially offset by the benefit of reduced workers compensation insurance
liabilities resulting from lower than anticipated claims development.
Pei Wei: Labor expenses as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei increased primarily due to
decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales, increased management incentive
costs and continued wage rate pressure in culinary positions.
Operating
Operating expenses consist primarily of various restaurant-level costs such as repairs and
maintenance, utilities and marketing, which are generally variable and fluctuate with revenues. Our
experience to date has been that operating costs during the first four to nine months of a newly
opened restaurant are materially greater than what can be expected after that time, both in
aggregate dollars and as a percentage of revenues. Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues at our Bistro restaurants decreased due
to an adjustment resulting from a modification of our accounting policy related to utility
accruals during the second quarter of 2006. Excluding this adjustment, operating expenses as a
percentage of revenues increased primarily due to higher disposable supplies expenses, increased
marketing spending and higher maintenance contract costs.
Pei Wei: Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues at our Pei Wei restaurants decreased
due to an adjustment resulting from a modification of our accounting policy related to utility
accruals during the second quarter of 2006. Excluding this adjustment, operating expenses as a
percentage of revenues were consistent with prior year. This was primarily due to reduced
take-out supplies, disposable supplies and menu printing costs partially offset by higher
utilities and maintenance expenses and increased marketing spending as well as the impact of
decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales.
Occupancy
Occupancy costs include both fixed and variable portions of rent, common area maintenance charges,
property insurance and property taxes. Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro increased primarily due to
higher general liability insurance costs for 2007 and a slight increase in property tax expense
due to new stores opening in geographic areas with higher property tax rates.
Pei Wei: Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei increased primarily due
decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales and higher general liability
insurance costs for 2007.
13
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses are comprised of expenses associated with corporate and
administrative functions that support restaurant development and operations and provide
infrastructure to support future growth, including management and staff salaries, employee
benefits, travel, legal and professional fees, technology and market research. Each segment
contributed as follows:
Bistro: General and administrative costs at the Bistro increased primarily due to higher
management incentive accruals due to the impact of the 2007 change in the Bistro partnership
structure.
Pei Wei: General and administrative costs at Pei Wei increased primarily due to an increase in
compensation and benefits expense related to the addition of development and operating partners,
higher management incentive accruals and, to a lesser extent, increased health insurance costs
and higher share-based compensation expense. As a percentage of revenues, Pei Weis general and
administrative costs decreased compared to the prior year due to improved leveraging of general
and administrative costs resulting from additional store openings.
Shared Services and Other: General and administrative costs for Shared Services and Other
increased $0.9 million principally due to higher compensation and benefits expense primarily
related to the addition of corporate management personnel, and, to a lesser extent, increased
share-based compensation expense.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses include the depreciation and amortization of fixed assets
and the amortization of intangible assets and non-transferable liquor license fees. Each segment
contributed as follows:
Bistro: Depreciation and amortization increased primarily due to additional depreciation and
amortization on restaurants opened during the last half of fiscal 2006 and during the first half
of fiscal 2007 and, to a lesser extent, an increase in amortization of intangible and other
assets. As a percentage of revenues, depreciation and amortization increased due to higher
average capital expenditures for new restaurants and increased remodeling costs at existing
restaurants.
Pei Wei: Depreciation and amortization increased primarily due to additional depreciation and
amortization on restaurants opened during the last half of fiscal 2006 and during the first half
of fiscal 2007. As a percentage of revenues, depreciation and amortization increased due to
decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales and higher average capital
expenditures for new restaurants.
Preopening Expense
Preopening expenses, which are expensed as incurred, consist of expenses incurred prior to opening
a new restaurant and are comprised principally of manager salaries and relocation costs, employee
payroll and related training costs. Preopening expenses also include straight-line rent for the
period between the possession date of leased premises and the restaurant opening date. Each
segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Preopening expense increased primarily due to the timing of costs related to upcoming
third and fourth quarter new restaurant openings compared to the prior year.
Pei Wei: Preopening expense increased primarily due to the impact of opening ten new Pei Wei
restaurants during the second quarter of 2007 compared to seven new Pei Wei restaurants during
the second quarter of 2006, partially offset by a slight decrease in average per location
preopening costs incurred during the current year principally due to opening additional new
stores in mature markets which typically results in lower preopening costs due to operational
efficiencies.
Partner Investment Expense
Partner investment expense represents the difference between the imputed fair value of our legal
partners ownership interests at the time the partners invest in their restaurants and our
partners cash contributions for those ownership interests. Additionally, for those partners who
are bought out prior to the restaurant reaching maturity (typically after five years of operation),
partner investment expense includes a reversal of previously recognized expense for the difference
between the fair value of the partners interest at inception date and the fair value at the date
of repurchase, to the extent that the former is greater.
14
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Partner investment expense at the Bistro decreased due to the change in partnership
structure discussed above, which led to a significant increase in early buyouts of minority
partner interests during the first half of fiscal 2007. These early buyouts resulted in a $0.8
million reversal during the second quarter of previously recognized partner investment expense
due to the fair value of the partners interest at inception date exceeding the fair value of
the partners interest at repurchase date. Additionally, as a result of the change in
partnership structure, partner investment expense is no longer recognized at the time a new
restaurant opens.
Pei Wei: Partner investment expense at Pei Wei decreased primarily due to expense reductions
related to minority partner buyouts and, to a lesser extent, the impact of a lower imputed fair
value of partnership interests in new Pei Wei restaurants in 2007. These items were partially
offset by the impact of opening ten new restaurants during the second quarter of fiscal 2007
compared to opening seven new restaurants during the second quarter of fiscal 2006.
Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net
Consolidated interest and other income (expense), net decreased primarily due to lower interest
income resulting from the sale of interest-bearing securities to finance our share repurchase
program, which commenced during the third quarter of fiscal 2006 (see Share Repurchase Program in
the Liquidity and Capital Resources section for further detail). Interest income earned during
2007 primarily relates to interest-bearing overnight deposits.
Minority Interest
Minority interest represents the portion of our net earnings which is attributable to the
collective ownership interests of our minority investors. As previously discussed, in many of our
restaurants we employ a partnership management structure whereby we have entered into a series of
partnership agreements with our regional managers, certain of our general managers, and certain of
our executive chefs. Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Minority interest as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro decreased due to the impact
of partner buyouts occurring during the first half of fiscal 2007, which resulted in a reduction
in the number of minority interests from 357 as of July 2, 2006 to 182 minority interests as of
July 1, 2007.
Pei Wei: Minority interest as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei decreased slightly due to the
impact of lower restaurant net income and partner buyouts occurring during the first half of
fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our
effective tax rate was 25.8% for the second quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to 23.5% for the
second quarter of fiscal 2006. The income tax rates for the second quarter of fiscal 2007 and
fiscal 2006 differed from the expected provision for income taxes, which is derived by applying the
statutory income tax rate, primarily as a result of FICA tip credits.
See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our adoption of FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109.
15
Results for the six months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006
Our consolidated operating results for the six months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006 were as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
531,815 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
454,594 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
77,221 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
145,926 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
124,725 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
21,201 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
Labor |
|
|
179,899 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
|
152,317 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
% |
|
|
27,582 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
% |
Operating |
|
|
83,630 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
71,051 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
12,579 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
30,523 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
25,218 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5,305 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
32,528 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
27,289 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
5,239 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
26,285 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
20,920 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
5,365 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
% |
Preopening expense |
|
|
5,836 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
4,511 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
% |
Partner investment expense |
|
|
(1,869 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
%) |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
(2,994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
502,758 |
|
|
|
94.5 |
% |
|
|
427,156 |
|
|
|
94.0 |
% |
|
|
75,602 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
29,057 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
27,438 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
(538 |
) |
|
|
(50.8 |
%) |
Minority interest |
|
|
(2,768 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
(4,055 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
%) |
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
(31.7 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
26,811 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
24,443 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
2,368 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(7,069 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
|
|
(6,541 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
%) |
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
19,742 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
$ |
17,902 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
$ |
1,840 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain percentage amounts do not sum to total due to rounding. Percentages over 100% not
displayed.
Operating results for the Bistro for the six months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006 were
as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
415,202 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
370,629 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
44,573 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
113,477 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
101,581 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
11,896 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
Labor |
|
|
139,139 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
% |
|
|
123,405 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
15,734 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
Operating |
|
|
63,878 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
56,550 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
7,328 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
22,815 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
19,787 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
3,028 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
11,834 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
10,436 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
19,537 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
16,316 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
3,221 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
% |
Preopening expense |
|
|
3,046 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
2,641 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
Partner investment expense |
|
|
(2,679 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
%) |
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
(3,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
371,047 |
|
|
|
89.4 |
% |
|
|
331,712 |
|
|
|
89.5 |
% |
|
|
39,335 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
44,155 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
38,917 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
5,238 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(2,170 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
(3,486 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
%) |
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
(37.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes |
|
$ |
42,056 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
$ |
35,431 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
$ |
6,625 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain percentage amounts do not sum to total due to rounding. Percentages over 100% not
displayed.
16
Operating results for Pei Wei for the six months ended July 1, 2007 and July 2, 2006 were as
follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
July 1, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
115,305 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
83,965 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
31,340 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
31,921 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
23,144 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
8,777 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
% |
Labor |
|
|
40,031 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
28,912 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
% |
|
|
11,119 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
Operating |
|
|
19,386 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
14,501 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
4,885 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
7,599 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
5,431 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
5,908 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
4,784 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
1,124 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,987 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
48.1 |
% |
Preopening expense |
|
|
2,789 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
1,729 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
61.3 |
% |
Partner investment expense |
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
114,431 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
% |
|
|
82,673 |
|
|
|
98.5 |
% |
|
|
31,758 |
|
|
|
38.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
(32.4 |
%) |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(55.6 |
%) |
Minority interest |
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
%) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes |
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
$ |
759 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
$ |
(467 |
) |
|
|
(61.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain percentage amounts do not sum to total due to rounding. Percentages over 100% not
displayed.
Revenues
Each segment contributed to current year revenue growth as follows:
Bistro: The increase in revenues was attributable to revenues of $44.7 million generated by 20
new Bistro restaurants that opened during the first half of 2007 and the second half of 2006,
partially offset by a $0.2 million net decrease in revenues for restaurants that opened prior to
the second quarter of 2006. An effective price increase of approximately 2-3% impacted all
restaurants and also contributed to the increase in revenues. Such increases were partially
offset by a decline in overall guest traffic during the first half of fiscal 2007.
Pei Wei: The increase in revenues was attributable to revenues of $25.3 million generated by 38
new Pei Wei restaurants that opened during the first half of 2007 and the second half of 2006 and
a $6.0 million increase in revenues for restaurants that opened prior to the second quarter of
2006. An effective price increase of approximately 2% impacted all restaurants and also
contributed to the increase in revenues. Such increases were partially offset by a slight
decline in overall guest traffic during the first half of fiscal 2007.
In addition to the revenues earned by Bistro and Pei Wei, consolidated revenues include $1.3
million of revenues generated by our Taneko concept.
Costs and Expenses
Cost of Sales
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro decreased slightly primarily
due to lower pork and seafood expense resulting from favorable pricing, improved yields and
increased purchasing through national distribution contracts partially offset by higher produce
expense. An adjustment resulting from a modification of our accounting policy related to rebate
accruals during the second quarter of 2006 partially offset this decrease.
17
Pei Wei: Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei increased slightly primarily due
to an adjustment resulting from a modification of our accounting policy related to rebate
accruals during the second quarter of 2006. Excluding this adjustment, cost of sales as a
percentage of revenues decreased slightly primarily due to lower pork expense resulting from
favorable pricing and yields partially offset by higher other food expense.
Labor
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Labor expenses as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro increased primarily due to
higher management incentive costs principally resulting from the 2007 change in the Bistro
partnership structure and, to a lesser extent, the impact of wage rate pressure across all labor
categories and decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales. The impact of
these factors was partially offset by the benefit of reduced workers compensation insurance
liabilities resulting from lower than anticipated claims activity.
Pei Wei: Labor expenses as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei increased primarily due to
decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales, increased management incentive
costs and continued wage rate pressure in culinary positions, partially offset by the benefit of
reduced workers compensation insurance liabilities.
Operating
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues at our Bistro restaurants increased
slightly including an adjustment resulting from a modification of our accounting policy related
to utility accruals during the second quarter of 2006. Excluding this adjustment, operating
expenses as a percentage of revenues increased primarily due to higher maintenance contract
costs, higher disposable supplies expenses, increased marketing spending and menu printing costs
related to our new Yunnan menu and new menu format introduced during the first quarter of 2007.
Pei Wei: Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues at our Pei Wei restaurants decreased
due to an adjustment resulting from a modification of our accounting policy related to utility
accruals during the second quarter of 2006. Excluding this adjustment, operating expenses as a
percentage of revenues were consistent with prior year. This was primarily due to reduced
take-out supplies, disposable supplies and menu printing costs partially offset by higher
utilities and maintenance expenses, increased marketing spending as well as the impact of
decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales.
Occupancy
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro increased primarily due to
higher general liability insurance costs for 2007 combined with decreased leverage resulting
from lower average weekly sales.
Pei Wei: Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei increased slightly primarily
due to decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales combined with higher general
liability insurance costs for 2007.
General and Administrative
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: General and administrative costs at the Bistro increased primarily due to higher
management incentive accruals due to the impact of the 2007 change in the Bistro partnership
structure.
Pei Wei: General and administrative costs at Pei Wei increased primarily due to an increase in
compensation and benefits expense related to the addition of development and operating partners,
higher management incentive accruals, increased health insurance costs and higher share-based
compensation expense. As a percentage of revenues, Pei Weis general and administrative costs
decreased compared to the prior year due to improved leveraging of general and administrative
costs resulting from additional store openings.
18
Shared Services and Other: General and administrative costs for Shared Services and Other
increased $2.8 million principally due to higher compensation and benefits expense primarily
related to the addition of corporate management personnel, increased share-based compensation
expense and, to a lesser extent, higher consulting and marketing costs.
Depreciation and Amortization
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Depreciation and amortization increased primarily due to additional depreciation and
amortization on restaurants opened during the last half of fiscal 2006 and during the first half
of fiscal 2007 and, to a lesser extent, an increase in amortization of intangible and other
assets. As a percentage of revenues, depreciation and amortization increased due to higher
average capital expenditures for new restaurants and decreased leverage resulting from lower
average weekly sales.
Pei Wei: Depreciation and amortization increased primarily due to additional depreciation and
amortization on restaurants opened during the last half of fiscal 2006 and during the first half
of fiscal 2007. As a percentage of revenues, depreciation and amortization increased due to
higher average capital expenditures for new restaurants and decreased leverage resulting from
lower average weekly sales.
Preopening Expense
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Preopening expense increased primarily due to the timing of costs related to upcoming
third and fourth quarter new restaurant openings compared to the prior year.
Pei Wei: Preopening expense increased primarily due to the impact of opening 19 new Pei Wei
restaurants during the first half of 2007 compared to 11 new Pei Wei restaurants during the
first half of 2006, partially offset by a slight decrease in average per location preopening
costs incurred during the current year principally due to opening additional new stores in
mature markets, which typically results in lower preopening costs due to operational
efficiencies.
Partner Investment Expense
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Partner investment expense at the Bistro decreased due to the change in partnership
structure discussed above, which led to a significant increase in early buyouts of minority
partner interests during the first half of fiscal 2007. These early buyouts resulted in a $2.7
million reversal of previously recognized partner investment expense due to the fair value of
the partners interest at inception date exceeding the fair value of the partners interest at
repurchase date. Additionally, as a result of the change in partnership structure, partner
investment expense is no longer recognized at the time a new restaurant opens.
Pei Wei: Partner investment expense at Pei Wei increased primarily due to the impact of
opening 19 new restaurants during the first half of fiscal 2007 compared to opening 11 new
restaurants during the first half of fiscal 2006, as well as expense reductions related to
minority partner buyouts in the prior year. These increases were partially offset by the
impact of a lower imputed fair value of partnership interests in new Pei Wei restaurants in
2007.
Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net
Consolidated interest and other income (expense), net decreased primarily due to lower interest
income resulting from the sale of interest-bearing securities to finance our share repurchase
program, which commenced during the third quarter of fiscal 2006 (see Share Repurchase Program in
the Liquidity and Capital Resources section for further detail). Interest income earned during
2007 primarily relates to interest-bearing overnight deposits.
19
Minority Interest
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Minority interest as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro decreased due to the impact
of partner buyouts occurring during the first half of fiscal 2007, which resulted in a reduction
in the number of minority interests from 357 as of July 2, 2006 to 182 minority interests as of
July 1, 2007.
Pei Wei: Minority interest as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei decreased due to the impact
of lower restaurant net income and partner buyouts occurring during the first half of fiscal
2007, which resulted in fewer minority partners compared to the prior year.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 26.4% for the first half of fiscal 2007 compared to 26.8% for the first
half of fiscal 2006. Disregarding the impact of reserve adjustments in both periods, our effective
tax rate was 27.5% and 27.8% for the first half of fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. The income
tax rates for the first half of fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 differed from the expected provision
for income taxes, which is derived by applying the statutory income tax rate, primarily as a result
of FICA tip credits.
See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our adoption of FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Our primary source of liquidity is cash provided by operations, though we also borrow under our
credit facility from time to time. Historically, our need for capital resources has primarily
resulted from our construction of new restaurants. In fiscal 2006, our need for capital resources
was also driven by the repurchase of our common stock and Pei Wei minority interests.
The following table presents a summary of our cash flows for the six months ended July 1, 2007 and
July 2, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
54,490 |
|
|
$ |
46,601 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(74,583 |
) |
|
|
(45,597 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(2,027 |
) |
|
|
(12,240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(22,120 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
We have funded our capital requirements since inception through sales of equity securities, debt
financing and cash flows from operations. Net cash provided by operating activities was $54.5
million and $46.6 million for the first half of fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. Net cash
provided by operating activities exceeded the net income for the periods due principally to the
effect of depreciation and amortization, an increase in operating liabilities and the effect of
minority interest, share-based compensation and partnership-related non-cash expenses.
Investing Activities
We use cash primarily to fund the development and construction of new restaurants. Net cash used in
investing activities during the first half of fiscal 2007 and 2006 was $74.6 million and $45.6
million, respectively, and primarily related to capital expenditures of
$64.4 million and $41.8 million during the first half of fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Capital expenditures during the current year increased compared to the prior year primarily due to
a higher number of new restaurant openings.
20
We intend to open 19 new Bistro restaurants and 37 new Pei Wei restaurants in fiscal year 2007. We
expect that our planned future Bistro restaurants will require, on average, a total cash investment
per restaurant of approximately $2.8 million to $3.0 million. We expect to spend approximately
$365,000 per restaurant for preopening costs, which excludes non-cash rent expense of approximately
$50,000. Total cash investment per each Pei Wei restaurant is expected to average $750,000 to
$850,000 and we expect to spend $113,000 per restaurant for preopening costs, which excludes
non-cash rent expense of approximately $27,000. The anticipated total cash investment per
restaurant is based on recent historical averages which have increased over prior years due to
increases in construction related costs of steel, aluminum and lumber. We expect total capital
expenditures for fiscal 2007 to approximate $120.0 million to $125.0 million.
Investment activities also include purchases of minority interests of $9.5 million and $1.2 million
during the first half of fiscal 2007 and 2006. We purchased 183 partnership interests during the
first half of 2007. This represents an increase in the historical rate of purchases resulting
primarily from the implementation of our new Bistro partnership structure at the beginning of the
current year and the corresponding desire of many of our existing partners to sell their
partnership interest and instead participate in our new management incentive compensation programs.
Additionally, net purchases of short-term investments totaling $2.2 million were included for the
first half of fiscal 2006.
Financing Activities
Financing activities during the first half of fiscal 2007 and 2006 included proceeds from stock
options exercised and employee stock purchases, distributions to minority partners, debt repayments
and the tax benefit from disqualifying stock option dispositions. Additionally, financing
activities during the first half of fiscal 2007 included $6.0 million of credit line borrowings and
financing activities during the first half of fiscal 2006 included $7.3 million related to the
purchase of Pei Wei minority interests.
Future capital requirements
Our capital requirements, including development costs related to the opening of additional
restaurants, have been and will continue to be significant. Our future capital requirements and the
adequacy of our available funds will depend on many factors, including the pace of expansion, real
estate markets, site locations, the nature of the arrangements negotiated with landlords and any
potential repurchases of our common stock. We believe that our cash flow from operations, together
with our current cash reserves and available credit lines, will be sufficient to fund our projected
capital requirements through 2007 and the foreseeable future. In the unlikely event that additional
capital is required, we may seek to raise such capital through public or private equity or debt
financing. Future capital funding transactions may result in dilution to current shareholders. We
can not assure you that such capital will be available on favorable terms, if at all.
Credit Facility
On August 4, 2006, we entered into a credit agreement with a commercial lending institution which
allows for borrowings up to $50.0 million at an interest rate of 50 basis points over the
applicable London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The revolving credit facility expires on August
4, 2011 and contains certain restrictions and conditions which require us to maintain a maximum
adjusted leverage ratio of 2.25:1 and a minimum fixed-charge coverage ratio of 1.25:1. We were in
compliance with these restrictions and conditions as of July 1, 2007. We had borrowings of $10.0
million outstanding under the credit facility as of July 1, 2007 and $9.7 million committed for the
issuance of a letter of credit which is required by insurance companies for our workers
compensation and general liability insurance programs. Available borrowings under the line of
credit were $30.3 million as of July 1, 2007.
Share Repurchase Program
In July 2006, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $50.0 million of our
outstanding shares of common stock from time to time in the open market or in private at prevailing
market prices over the next year. We have funded our share repurchases to date primarily with cash
on hand, however, we have also negotiated a $50.0 million revolving credit facility referenced
above to provide additional liquidity and offer flexibility in funding our share repurchases. We
repurchased 1.4 million shares of our common stock for $46.4 million during fiscal 2006 and none
thus far in fiscal 2007. The remaining $3.6 million available under this share repurchase
authorization expired during July 2007.
In July 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $50.0 million of our
outstanding shares of common stock from time to time in the open market or in private at prevailing
market prices over the next two years. We intend to use cash on hand and available credit lines to
repurchase shares.
21
Partnership Activities
As of July 1, 2007, there were 138 partners within the P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc. partnership
system. During the first half of fiscal 2007, we had the opportunity to purchase 19 partner
interests which had reached the five-year threshold period during the quarter, as well as 179
additional partner interests which had either (i) reached the end of their initial five-year term
in prior years, (ii) related to partners who left the Company prior to the initial five-year term
or (iii) related to partners who elected an early repurchase of their minority interest by the
Company due to the opportunity to participate in the new Bistro management incentive compensation
program. We purchased 183 of these interests in their entirety for a total of approximately $19.7
million. Of the total purchase price, approximately $9.5 million was paid in cash, while the
remaining balance has been recorded as debt on the consolidated balance sheet at July 1, 2007.
During the remainder of fiscal 2007, we will have the opportunity to purchase 19 additional
partnership interests which will reach their five-year anniversary. If all of these interests are
purchased, the total purchase price would approximate $2.0 million to $2.5 million based upon the
estimated fair value of the respective interests at July 1, 2007. If we purchase all of these
interests in 2007, the estimated liquidity impact would be a reduction of cash of approximately
$0.7 million to $0.8 million during the year.
Minority Interest Purchase
On January 9, 2006, we purchased the 13 percent minority interest held by key employees in our Pei
Wei Asian Diner subsidiary for a value of approximately $22.8 million, thereby making Pei Wei Asian
Diner a wholly owned subsidiary. The purchase price consideration consisted of $7.3 million in cash
and the conversion of outstanding options to purchase 98,100 shares of Pei Wei Asian Diner, Inc.
common stock into options to purchase 306,782 shares of P.F. Changs common stock. There was no
additional intrinsic value associated with the converted options to purchase P.F. Changs common
stock for the key employees. The transaction did not involve any changes in management or key
positions in Pei Wei.
New Accounting Standards
See Recent Accounting Pronouncements section of Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for
a summary of new accounting standards.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We are exposed to market risk primarily from fluctuations in interest rates on our short-term
investments and revolving credit facility. Our revolving credit facility allows for borrowings up
to $50.0 million bearing interest at variables rates of LIBOR plus 0.50%. We held no short-term
investments at December 31, 2006. We had borrowings of $10.0 million outstanding under our credit
facility and promissory notes totaling $11.2 million at July 1, 2007. A hypothetical 100 basis
point change in interest rates would not have a material impact on our results of operations.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
During the last fiscal quarter, there have been no significant changes in our internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect our internal control over financial reporting.
22
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
None
Risks that could have a negative impact on our business, revenues and performance results include
risks associated with the following: failure of our existing or new restaurants to achieve
predicted results; the inability to develop and construct our restaurants within projected budgets
and time periods; our ability to successfully expand our operations; increases in the minimum wage;
intense competition in the restaurant industry; changes in general economic and political
conditions that affect consumer spending; fluctuations in operating results; our inability to
retain key personnel; failure to comply with governmental regulations; future changes in financial
accounting standards; changes in how we account for certain aspects of our partnership program;
strain on our management resources resulting from implementing our growth strategy; potential labor
shortages that may delay planned openings; changes in food costs; rising insurance costs;
litigation; and expenses associated with compliance with changing regulation of corporate
governance and public disclosure. A more detailed description of each of these risk factors can be
found under the caption Risk Factors in our most recent Form 10-K, filed on February 14, 2007.
There have been no material changes to these risk factors other than the change of the following.
Failure to comply with governmental regulations could harm our business and our reputation.
We are subject to regulation by federal agencies and to licensing and regulation by state and local
health, sanitation, building, zoning, safety, fire and other departments relating to the
development and operation of restaurants. These regulations include matters relating to:
|
|
|
the environment; |
|
|
|
|
building construction; |
|
|
|
|
zoning requirements; |
|
|
|
|
the preparation and sale of food and alcoholic beverages; and |
|
|
|
|
employment. |
Our facilities are licensed and subject to regulation under state and local fire, health and
safety codes. The development and construction of additional restaurants will be subject to
compliance with applicable zoning, land use and environmental regulations. We may not be able to
obtain necessary licenses or other approvals on a cost-effective and timely basis in order to
construct and develop restaurants in the future.
Various federal and state labor laws govern our operations and our relationship with our
employees, including minimum wage, overtime, working conditions, fringe benefit and citizenship
requirements. In particular, we are subject to the regulations of the Bureau of Citizenship and
Immigration Services, or BCIS. The United States Congress has recently been considering changes to
Federal immigration laws and various states are also in the process of considering or have already
adopted new immigration laws. Some of these new laws may adversely affect our operations by
increasing our obligations for compliance and oversight. Though we require all workers to provide
us with the government-specified documentation evidencing their employment eligibility, some of our
employees may, without our knowledge, be unauthorized workers. Unauthorized workers are subject to
seizure and deportation and may subject us to fines, penalties or loss of our business license in
certain jurisdictions. Any material disruption of our business, as a result of seizure of our
workers, changes in immigration law, or significantly increased labor costs at our facilities in
the future, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating
results.
Our business can be adversely affected by negative publicity resulting from complaints or
litigation alleging poor food quality, food-borne illness or other health concerns or operating
issues stemming from one or a limited number of restaurants. Unfavorable publicity could taint
public perception of our restaurants.
Approximately 15 percent of our revenues at the Bistro, two percent at Pei Wei and 30 percent
at Taneko are attributable to the sale of alcoholic beverages. We are required to comply with the
alcohol licensing requirements of the federal government, states and municipalities where our
restaurants are located. Alcoholic beverage control regulations require applications to state
authorities and, in certain locations, county and municipal authorities for a license and permit to
sell alcoholic beverages. Typically, licenses must be renewed annually and may be revoked or
suspended for cause at any time. Alcoholic beverage control regulations relate to numerous aspects
of the daily operations of the restaurants, including minimum age of guests and employees, hours of
operation, advertising, wholesale purchasing, inventory control and handling, storage and
dispensing of alcoholic beverages. If we fail to comply with federal, state or local regulations,
our licenses may be revoked and we may be forced to terminate the sale of alcoholic beverages at
one or more of our restaurants.
The federal Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of
disability in public accommodations and employment. We are required to comply with the Americans
with Disabilities Act and regulations relating to accommodating the needs of the disabled in
connection with the construction of new facilities and with significant renovations of existing
facilities.
Failure to comply with these and other regulations could negatively impact our business and
our reputation.
Changes in food costs could negatively impact our revenues and results of operations.
Our profitability is dependent in part on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in food
costs. Other than for a portion of our commodities, like produce, which is purchased locally by
each restaurant and certain other specialty items that we purchase from Chinese import/export
brokers, we rely on Distribution Market Advantage as the primary distributor of our ingredients.
Distribution Market Advantage is a cooperative of multiple food distributors located throughout the
nation. We have a non-exclusive contract with Distribution Market Advantage on terms and conditions
which we believe are consistent with those made available to similarly situated restaurant
companies. Although we believe that alternative distribution sources are available, any increase in
distribution prices or failure to perform by the Distribution Market Advantage could cause our food
costs to fluctuate. Any disruption in the supply of specialty items from China due to quality or
availability issues could also cause our food costs to fluctuate. Additional factors beyond our
control, including adverse weather conditions and governmental regulation, may affect our food
costs. We may not be able to anticipate and react to changing food costs through our purchasing
practices and menu price adjustments in the future, and failure to do so could negatively impact
our revenues and results of operations.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None
23
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
Our Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on April 27, 2007. There were three proposals up for
approval. The results of voting are as follows:
1) The election of the Board of Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Votes |
|
Total Votes |
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
Richard L. Federico
|
|
|
24,480,695 |
|
|
|
332,770 |
|
|
|
6,162 |
|
F. Lane Cardwell, Jr.
|
|
|
20,769,830 |
|
|
|
4,036,653 |
|
|
|
12,944 |
|
Lesley H. Howe
|
|
|
24,761,606 |
|
|
|
52,660 |
|
|
|
5,361 |
|
M. Ann Rhoades
|
|
|
20,768,451 |
|
|
|
4,038,403 |
|
|
|
12,773 |
|
James G. Shennan, Jr.
|
|
|
20,769,097 |
|
|
|
4,037,564 |
|
|
|
12,966 |
|
R. Michael Welborn
|
|
|
24,754,158 |
|
|
|
60,451 |
|
|
|
5,018 |
|
Kenneth J. Wessels
|
|
|
24,764,676 |
|
|
|
50,953 |
|
|
|
3,998 |
|
Subsequent to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Kenneth A. May was appointed as an additional
member of the Board of Directors.
2) To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Companys independent auditors for the fiscal year
ending December 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Votes |
|
Total Votes |
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
24,784,538 |
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
4,089 |
|
3) To approve any adjournments of the meeting to another time or place, if necessary in the
judgment of proxy holders, for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies in favor of any of the
foregoing proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Votes |
|
Total Votes |
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
13,808,795 |
|
|
|
10,344,691 |
|
|
|
666,141 |
|
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
None
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description Document |
3(i)(1) |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. |
3(ii)(2) |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws. |
4.1(3) |
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate. |
4.2(3) |
|
Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated May 1, 1997. |
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for
Richard L. Federico. |
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Mark
D. Mumford. |
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for
Richard L. Federico. |
32.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Mark
D. Mumford. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on April
25, 2002. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-59749). |
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.F. CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ RICHARD L. FEDERICO |
|
|
|
Richard L. Federico |
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ MARK D. MUMFORD |
|
|
|
Mark D. Mumford |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
|
|
Date: July 25, 2007
25
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description Document |
3(i)(1) |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. |
3(ii)(2) |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws. |
4.1(3) |
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate. |
4.2(3) |
|
Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated May 1, 1997. |
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for
Richard L. Federico. |
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Mark
D. Mumford. |
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for
Richard L. Federico. |
32.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Mark
D. Mumford. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on April
25, 2002. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-59749). |
26