Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
_____
to
_____
..
Commission file number: 0-25123
P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
86-0815086
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
7676 East Pinnacle Peak Road
Scottsdale, Arizona
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
85255
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(480) 888-3000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports, and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of September 30, 2007, there were 26,000,154 outstanding shares of the registrants
Common Stock.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements |
P.F. CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Note 1) |
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4,624 |
|
|
$ |
31,589 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
4,406 |
|
|
|
4,232 |
|
Prepaids and other current assets |
|
|
24,502 |
|
|
|
28,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
33,532 |
|
|
|
64,816 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
502,463 |
|
|
|
421,770 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
6,819 |
|
|
|
6,819 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
21,751 |
|
|
|
12,644 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
10,887 |
|
|
|
7,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
575,452 |
|
|
$ |
514,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
16,145 |
|
|
$ |
15,255 |
|
Construction payable |
|
|
11,302 |
|
|
|
9,075 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
53,320 |
|
|
|
55,848 |
|
Unearned revenue |
|
|
13,794 |
|
|
|
18,226 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt, including $3,480 and $3,542 due to
related parties at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively |
|
|
6,844 |
|
|
|
5,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
101,405 |
|
|
|
103,891 |
|
Long-term debt, including $3,048 and $588 due to related parties at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
35,247 |
|
|
|
13,723 |
|
Lease obligations |
|
|
83,479 |
|
|
|
71,682 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,041 |
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
18,184 |
|
|
|
33,315 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized:
26,000,154 shares and 25,373,019 shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
193,655 |
|
|
|
174,101 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,397,261 shares outstanding at both
September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 |
|
|
(46,373 |
) |
|
|
(46,373 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
186,787 |
|
|
|
161,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
|
334,096 |
|
|
|
289,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
575,452 |
|
|
$ |
514,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
P.F. CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
270,880 |
|
|
$ |
231,024 |
|
|
$ |
802,695 |
|
|
$ |
685,618 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
74,092 |
|
|
|
62,954 |
|
|
|
220,018 |
|
|
|
187,679 |
|
Labor |
|
|
92,127 |
|
|
|
76,209 |
|
|
|
272,026 |
|
|
|
228,526 |
|
Operating |
|
|
43,999 |
|
|
|
36,382 |
|
|
|
127,629 |
|
|
|
107,433 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
16,025 |
|
|
|
13,371 |
|
|
|
46,548 |
|
|
|
38,589 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
17,375 |
|
|
|
14,641 |
|
|
|
49,903 |
|
|
|
41,930 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,855 |
|
|
|
11,584 |
|
|
|
41,140 |
|
|
|
32,504 |
|
Preopening expense |
|
|
4,939 |
|
|
|
3,792 |
|
|
|
10,775 |
|
|
|
8,303 |
|
Partner investment expense |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
|
|
2,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
263,341 |
|
|
|
220,420 |
|
|
|
766,099 |
|
|
|
647,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
10,604 |
|
|
|
36,596 |
|
|
|
38,042 |
|
Interest and other income (expense), net |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest and provision for income taxes |
|
|
7,529 |
|
|
|
10,948 |
|
|
|
37,108 |
|
|
|
39,446 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(808 |
) |
|
|
(1,948 |
) |
|
|
(3,576 |
) |
|
|
(6,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
6,721 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
33,532 |
|
|
|
33,443 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
|
|
(2,414 |
) |
|
|
(8,515 |
) |
|
|
(8,955 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,275 |
|
|
$ |
6,586 |
|
|
$ |
25,017 |
|
|
$ |
24,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
25,773 |
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
25,656 |
|
|
|
26,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
26,105 |
|
|
|
26,558 |
|
|
|
26,093 |
|
|
|
27,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
P.F. CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
25,017 |
|
|
$ |
24,488 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
41,140 |
|
|
|
32,504 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
7,390 |
|
|
|
7,409 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
3,576 |
|
|
|
6,003 |
|
Partner bonus expense, imputed |
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
(6,529 |
) |
Partner investment expense |
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
|
|
2,612 |
|
Tax benefit from disqualifying stock option dispositions credited to equity |
|
|
(4,465 |
) |
|
|
(1,685 |
) |
Other |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(378 |
) |
Prepaids and other current assets |
|
|
8,920 |
|
|
|
1,698 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(2,774 |
) |
|
|
(1,667 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
(1,768 |
) |
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(2,528 |
) |
|
|
7,863 |
|
Lease obligations |
|
|
11,914 |
|
|
|
6,957 |
|
Unearned revenue |
|
|
(4,432 |
) |
|
|
(5,223 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
84,241 |
|
|
|
73,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(115,948 |
) |
|
|
(78,601 |
) |
Purchase of minority interests |
|
|
(11,716 |
) |
|
|
(1,579 |
) |
Capitalized interest |
|
|
(1,249 |
) |
|
|
(640 |
) |
Purchase of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,660 |
) |
Sale of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(128,913 |
) |
|
|
(38,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on credit facility |
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(30,006 |
) |
|
|
(4,999 |
) |
Proceeds from stock options exercised and employee stock purchases |
|
|
7,699 |
|
|
|
4,605 |
|
Tax benefit from disqualifying stock option dispositions credited to equity |
|
|
4,465 |
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
Distributions to minority partners |
|
|
(5,428 |
) |
|
|
(7,781 |
) |
Proceeds from minority partners contributions |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
Payments of capital lease obligation |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,515 |
) |
Purchase of subsidiary common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
17,707 |
|
|
|
(52,688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(26,965 |
) |
|
|
(17,376 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
|
|
31,589 |
|
|
|
31,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
|
$ |
4,624 |
|
|
$ |
14,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
1,341 |
|
|
$ |
812 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds |
|
|
4,524 |
|
|
|
10,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of minority interests through issuance of long-term debt and conversion
to members capital |
|
$ |
11,268 |
|
|
$ |
1,405 |
|
Change in construction payable |
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
5,972 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Business and Basis of Presentation
As of September 30, 2007, P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc. (the Company) owned and operated 162
full service restaurants throughout the United States under the name of P.F. Changs China Bistro
(the Bistro). The Company also owned and operated 137 quick casual restaurants under the name of
Pei Wei Asian Diner (Pei Wei) and one full service restaurant under the name Taneko Japanese
Tavern.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of
the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating
results for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 30, 2007.
The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes
required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company grants stock options for a fixed number of shares to certain employees and directors
with an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair value of the shares at the date of grant.
The Company also grants restricted stock with a fair value determined based on the Companys
closing stock price on the date of grant. On January 2, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions
of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS)
No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS 123R), Share-Based Payment, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107,
Share-Based Payment, requiring the measurement and recognition of all share-based compensation
under the fair value method. The Company implemented SFAS 123R using the modified prospective
transition method, which does not result in the restatement of previously issued financial
statements.
The fair value for options granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
October 1, 2006 was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with
the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
Expected life of options (years) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Expected stock volatility |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
The estimated fair value of share-based compensation plans and other options is amortized to
expense over the vesting period. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further
discussion of the Companys share-based employee compensation.
5
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157
provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The standard expands
required disclosures about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair
value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on
earnings. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157 on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxesan interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in tax positions. FIN 48 requires that the Company recognize the impact of a tax
position in the Companys financial statements if that position is more likely than not to be
sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with the cumulative effect of the
change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. The adoption
of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In May 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FIN 48-1, Definition of Settlement in FASB
Interpretation No. 48 (the FSP). The FSP provides guidance about how an enterprise should
determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously
unrecognized tax benefits. Under the FSP, a tax position could be effectively settled on
completion of examination by a taxing authority if the entity does not intend to appeal or litigate
the result and it is remote that the taxing authority would examine or re-examine the tax position.
Application of the FSP shall be upon the initial adoption date of FIN 48.
In March 2006, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force issued Issue 06-3 (EITF 06-3), How Sales Taxes
Collected From Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income
Statement. A tentative consensus was reached that a company should disclose its accounting policy
(i.e., gross or net presentation) regarding presentation of taxes within the scope of EITF 06-3. If
taxes are significant and reported on a gross basis, a company should disclose the amount of such
taxes for each period for which an income statement is presented. The guidance is effective for
periods beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company presents sales tax on a net basis in its
consolidated financial statements.
2. Net Income Per Share
Net income per share is computed in accordance with SFAS 128, Earnings per Share. Basic net income
per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed based on the weighted average number of
shares of common stock and potentially dilutive securities, which includes options outstanding
under the Companys stock option plans. For the three months ended September 30, 2007 and October
1, 2006, 1.6 million and 1.8 million, respectively, of the Companys shares were excluded from the
calculation due to their anti-dilutive effect. For both the nine months ended September 30, 2007
and October 1, 2006, 1.6 million of the Companys shares were excluded from the calculation due to
their anti-dilutive effect.
3. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, gross |
|
$ |
24,720 |
|
|
$ |
14,343 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(2,969 |
) |
|
|
(1,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
21,751 |
|
|
$ |
12,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets as of September 30, 2007 include additional intangible assets recognized upon the
Companys buyout of minority partner interests when the Companys purchase price exceeded the
imputed fair value at the time of the original investment.
6
4. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll |
|
$ |
15,637 |
|
|
$ |
18,099 |
|
Sales and use tax payable |
|
|
5,923 |
|
|
|
6,531 |
|
Property tax payable |
|
|
3,991 |
|
|
|
3,159 |
|
Accrued insurance |
|
|
14,557 |
|
|
|
13,701 |
|
Accrued rent |
|
|
4,296 |
|
|
|
3,708 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
8,916 |
|
|
|
10,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses |
|
$ |
53,320 |
|
|
$ |
55,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Credit Facility
On August 31, 2007, the Company entered into a senior credit facility (Credit Facility) with
several commercial financial institutions which allows for borrowings of up to $150.0 million.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest, at the Companys option, at a rate equal to
either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin as defined in the Credit Facility or (ii) the higher of
(a) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus one-half of 1.0% or (b) the Prime Rate as announced by
JPMorgan Chase Bank. The Credit Facility bears a commitment fee on the unused portion of the
revolver at an annual rate of 0.125%.
The Credit Facility expires on August 30, 2013 and contains customary representations, warranties,
negative and affirmative covenants, including a requirement for the Company to maintain a maximum
leverage ratio of 2.5:1 and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25:1, as well as customary
events of default and certain default provisions that could result in acceleration of the Credit
Facility. The Company was in compliance with these restrictions and conditions as of September 30,
2007.
The Credit Facility is guaranteed by the Companys material existing and future domestic
subsidiaries.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company had borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility totaling
$30.0 million at an average interest rate of 6.50% as well as $9.7 million committed for the
issuance of letters of credit, which is required by insurance companies for the Companys workers
compensation and general liability insurance programs. Available borrowings under the Credit
Facility were $110.3 million at September 30, 2007.
7
6. Share-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation expense includes compensation expense, recognized over the applicable
vesting periods, for share-based awards granted after January 2, 2006 and for share-based awards
granted prior to, but not yet vested as of the Companys adoption of SFAS 123R on January 2, 2006.
At September 30, 2007, non-vested share-based compensation, net of estimated forfeitures, totaled
$18.9 million for stock options and $5.3 million for restricted stock. This expense will be
recognized over the remaining weighted average vesting period which is approximately 2.4 years for
both stock options and restricted stock.
During the three months ended September 30, 2007, in conjunction with its annual corporate grant,
the Company issued 240,260 stock options and 124,972 restricted stock awards with weighted average
grant date fair values of $13.76 and $33.57, respectively.
Share-based compensation is classified as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Labor |
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
606 |
|
|
$ |
1,048 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
2,326 |
|
|
|
6,784 |
|
|
|
6,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation |
|
|
2,593 |
|
|
|
2,658 |
|
|
|
7,390 |
|
|
|
7,409 |
|
Less: tax benefit |
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
|
|
(2,037 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation, net of tax |
|
$ |
1,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,927 |
|
|
$ |
5,450 |
|
|
$ |
5,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Income Taxes
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation,
the Company recognized no material adjustment to the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits
that existed as of December 31, 2006. At the date of adoption, the Company had $2.1 million of
unrecognized tax benefits, all of which would impact the Companys effective tax rate if
recognized. As of September 30, 2007, the Company had $1.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits.
It is the Companys policy to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions
in income tax expense. As of both the date of adoption and September 30, 2007, the Company had
accrued $0.2 million of interest and $0.1 million of penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
8
8. Segment Reporting
The Company operates exclusively in the food service industry and has determined that its
reportable segments are those that are based on the Companys methods of internal reporting and
management structure. The Companys reportable segments are Bistro and Pei Wei. During fiscal 2006,
the Company opened Taneko Japanese Tavern, a new full service restaurant located in Scottsdale,
Arizona, which is reported within Shared Services and Other. There were no material amounts of
revenues or transfers among reportable segments.
The table below presents information about reportable segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shared Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Bistro |
|
|
Pei Wei |
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
270,880 |
|
|
$ |
598 |
|
|
$ |
208,544 |
|
|
$ |
61,738 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
6,721 |
|
|
|
(8,773 |
) |
|
|
16,904 |
|
|
|
(1,410 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
51,577 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
40,340 |
|
|
|
11,153 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,855 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
10,861 |
|
|
|
3,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended October 1, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
231,024 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
184,914 |
|
|
$ |
46,110 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
(7,733 |
) |
|
|
17,528 |
|
|
|
(795 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
36,819 |
|
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
25,930 |
|
|
|
9,235 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,584 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
8,831 |
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
802,695 |
|
|
$ |
1,906 |
|
|
$ |
623,746 |
|
|
$ |
177,043 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
33,532 |
|
|
|
(24,310 |
) |
|
|
58,960 |
|
|
|
(1,118 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
115,948 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
85,816 |
|
|
|
29,913 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
41,140 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
30,398 |
|
|
|
9,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended October 1, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
685,618 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
555,543 |
|
|
$ |
130,075 |
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
|
33,443 |
|
|
|
(19,480 |
) |
|
|
52,959 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
78,601 |
|
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
53,140 |
|
|
|
22,469 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
32,504 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
25,147 |
|
|
|
6,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
575,452 |
|
|
$ |
37,011 |
|
|
$ |
426,395 |
|
|
$ |
112,046 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
6,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,566 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
514,045 |
|
|
$ |
29,755 |
|
|
$ |
395,263 |
|
|
$ |
89,027 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
6,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,566 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
9. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is engaged in various legal actions, which arise in the ordinary course of its
business. The Company is also currently under examination by various taxing authorities for years
not closed by the statute of limitations. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate
disposition of these matters, it is the opinion of the Companys management, based upon the
information available at this time, that the outcome of these matters, individually or in the
aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, liquidity or
financial condition of the Company.
9
10. Subsequent Event
On October 19, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors increased the amount of the Companys current
share repurchase program authorization from $50.0 million to $100.0 million. Under this program,
the Company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open
market or in private during the two-year period ending October 19, 2009, at prevailing market
prices. The Company intends to use cash on hand and available credit lines to repurchase shares
under the program.
10
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
This information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report and the audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 contained in our 2006
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Some of the statements in this section contain forwardlooking statements, which involve risks and
uncertainties. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as may,
will, should, expect, plan, intend, forecast, anticipate, believe, estimate, predict, potential,
continue or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. The forward-looking
statements contained in this section involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and situations
that may cause our or our industrys actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements
to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by these statements. Factors that might cause actual events or results to
differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements may include the matters
listed under Risk Factors in Item 1A (a detailed description of which can be found under the
caption Risk Factors in our most recently filed form 10-K) and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q,
including, but not limited to, failure of our existing or new restaurants to achieve predicted
results, the inability to develop and construct our restaurants within projected budgets and time
periods and our ability to successfully expand our operations. Because we cannot guarantee future
results, levels of activity, performance or achievements, you should not place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements.
Overview
We own and operate three restaurant concepts in the Asian niche: P.F. Changs China Bistro
(Bistro), Pei Wei Asian Diner (Pei Wei) and Taneko Japanese Tavern (Taneko).
Bistro
As of September 30, 2007, we owned and operated 162 full service Bistro restaurants that feature a
blend of high quality, traditional Chinese cuisine with attentive service and American hospitality
in a sophisticated, contemporary bistro setting. P.F. Changs was formed in early 1996 with the
acquisition of the four original Bistro restaurants and the hiring of an experienced management
team. Utilizing a partnership management philosophy, we embarked on a strategic expansion of the
concept targeted at major metropolitan areas throughout the United States. We own and operate all
of our restaurants with the exception of a Bistro restaurant located in Honolulu, Hawaii which
opened in September 2006 under a joint venture arrangement in which we own a minority interest.
We intend to open 20 new Bistros during fiscal 2007, 10 of which were open by the end of the third
quarter of 2007. We will continue our development in existing markets and plan to enter eight new
markets in 2007. We have signed lease agreements for all of our development planned for fiscal
2007. We intend to continue to develop Bistro restaurants that typically range in size from 6,000
to 7,500 square feet, and that require, on average, a total cash investment of approximately $2.8
million to $3.0 million and total invested capital of approximately $4.0 million per restaurant
(net of estimated landlord reimbursements). This total capitalized investment includes the
capitalized lease value of the property, which can vary greatly depending on the specific trade
area. Preopening expenses are expected to average approximately $415,000 per restaurant during
2007, which includes approximately $50,000 per restaurant in preopening rent.
Pei Wei
As of September 30, 2007, we owned and operated 137 quick casual Pei Wei restaurants that offer a
modest menu of freshly prepared, high quality Asian cuisine served in a relaxed, warm environment
offering attentive counter service and take-out flexibility. Pei Wei opened its first unit in July
2000 in the Phoenix, Arizona area and has expanded significantly since then.
We intend to open 37 Pei Wei restaurants in 2007, 30 of which were open by the end of the third
quarter of 2007. We will continue our development in existing markets and plan to enter nine new
markets in 2007. We have signed lease agreements for all of our development planned for fiscal
2007. Our Pei Wei restaurants are generally 2,800 to 3,400 square feet in size and require an
average total cash investment of approximately $750,000 to $850,000 and total invested capital of
approximately $1.4 million per restaurant (net of estimated landlord reimbursements). Preopening
expenses are expected to average approximately $140,000 per restaurant during 2007, which includes
approximately $27,000 per restaurant in preopening rent.
11
Taneko
On October 2, 2006, we opened our first Taneko restaurant in Scottsdale, Arizona, featuring
natural, organic and seasonal ingredients highlighting the diverse cooking styles of Japan.
Inspired by izakayas, or local taverns, Taneko offers an extensive variety of food and beverages in
a comfortable atmosphere.
Change in Partnership Structure
We utilize a partnership philosophy to facilitate the development, leadership and operation of our
restaurants. Historically, this philosophy was embodied in a traditional legal partnership
structure, which included capital contributions from our partners in exchange for an ownership
stake in the profits and losses of our restaurants. Effective January 2007 for new store openings,
the Bistro began employing a different structure to achieve the same goal. At the restaurant
level, our Operating and Culinary Partners (still partners in the philosophical, but not legal
sense) no longer have a direct ownership stake in the profits and losses of a restaurant, but are
instead eligible to receive monthly incentive payments based upon the profitability of the
restaurant, as well as participate in an incentive program that rewards long-term improvements in
the operating performance of the restaurant. As a result of these changes, awards made to the
individuals participating in the new plan are classified as compensation rather than as minority
interest expense. Accordingly, compensation expense for our Operating and Culinary Partners is
reflected in the consolidated income statement as Labor Expense. Additionally, a similar structure
exists for our Market Partners and Regional Vice Presidents, with related compensation reflected as
General and Administrative Expense in the consolidated income statement. Partner investment
expense is no longer recognized for new Bistro restaurant openings beginning in 2007 as a result of
this change. Additionally, many existing legal partners have requested an early buyout of their
partnership interest as a result of their desire to participate in the new plan, the financial
impact of which is discussed under Partner Investment Expense in Results of Operations.
The Pei Wei partnership structure is not affected by the changes at the Bistro and the traditional
partnership structure remains in effect for new Pei Wei restaurant openings during 2007.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies are those that require significant judgment. There have been no
material changes to the critical accounting policies previously reported in our 2006 Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Results of Operations
The following tables set forth certain unaudited quarterly information for the three and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, respectively. This quarterly information has
been prepared on a basis consistent with the audited financial statements and, in the opinion of
management, includes all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair presentation of the information for the periods presented. Our quarterly operating results may
fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, and operating results for any quarter
are not necessarily indicative of results for a full fiscal year.
One of the factors that has in the past caused fluctuations in our operating results is preopening
expenses. Historically, we have experienced variability in the amount and percentage of revenues
attributable to preopening expenses. We typically incur the most significant portion of preopening
expenses associated with a given restaurant within the two months immediately preceding, and the
month of, the opening of the restaurant. Additionally, there may be variability in the amount and
percentage of revenues attributable to partner investment expense as a result of the timing of
opening new Pei Wei restaurants and the timing of purchasing partner interests. Partner investment
expense generally represents the difference between the imputed fair value of our partners
ownership interests and our partners cash capital contribution for these interests.
In addition, our experience to date has been that labor and operating costs associated with a newly
opened restaurant for the first several months of operation are materially greater than what can be
expected after that time, both in aggregate dollars and as a percentage of revenues. Accordingly,
the volume and timing of new restaurant openings has had and is expected to continue to have, a
meaningful impact on preopening expenses, labor, operating and partner investment costs until such
time as a larger base of restaurants in operation mitigates such impact.
12
Results for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006
Our consolidated operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1,
2006 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
270,880 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
231,024 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
39,856 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
74,092 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
62,954 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
11,138 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
Labor |
|
|
92,127 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
76,209 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
% |
|
|
15,918 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
% |
Operating |
|
|
43,999 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
36,382 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
7,617 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
16,025 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
13,371 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
17,375 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
14,641 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,855 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
11,584 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
3,271 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
% |
Preopening expense |
|
|
4,939 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
3,792 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
% |
Partner investment expense |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
%) |
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
263,341 |
|
|
|
97.2 |
% |
|
|
220,420 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
% |
|
|
42,921 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
10,604 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
(3,065 |
) |
|
|
(28.9 |
%) |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
%) |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(808 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
|
|
(1,948 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
%) |
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
6,721 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
(2,279 |
) |
|
|
(25.3 |
%) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
(2,414 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
%) |
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
40.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,275 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
$ |
6,586 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
$ |
(1,311 |
) |
|
|
(19.9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain percentage amounts may not sum to total due to rounding. Percentages over 100% not
displayed.
Operating results for the Bistro for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1,
2006 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
208,544 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
184,914 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
23,630 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
56,943 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
50,131 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
6,812 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
Labor |
|
|
69,946 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
% |
|
|
59,959 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
% |
|
|
9,987 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
% |
Operating |
|
|
32,981 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
28,306 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
4,675 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
11,739 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
10,307 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
5,990 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
4,773 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,861 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
8,831 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
% |
Preopening expense |
|
|
2,974 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
% |
Partner investment expense |
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
%) |
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
(1,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
191,001 |
|
|
|
91.6 |
% |
|
|
165,618 |
|
|
|
89.6 |
% |
|
|
25,383 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
17,543 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
19,296 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
(1,753 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
%) |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
%) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
%) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
% |
Minority interest |
|
|
(599 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
|
|
(1,717 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
%) |
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
65.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes |
|
$ |
16,904 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
$ |
17,528 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
$ |
(624 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain percentage amounts may not sum to total due to rounding. Percentages over 100% not
displayed.
13
Operating results for Pei Wei for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1,
2006 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
61,738 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
46,110 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
15,628 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
16,922 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
12,823 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
4,099 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
% |
Labor |
|
|
21,843 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
% |
|
|
16,250 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
|
5,593 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
% |
Operating |
|
|
10,835 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
8,076 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
2,759 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
4,231 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
3,064 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
3,342 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
46.8 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,417 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
% |
Preopening expense |
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
63.2 |
% |
Partner investment expense |
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(31.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
62,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,239 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
(1,179 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
%) |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
%) |
|
|
(611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
%) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(9.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
(1,410 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
%) |
|
$ |
(795 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
%) |
|
$ |
(615 |
) |
|
|
77.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain percentage amounts may not sum to total due to rounding. Percentages over 100% not
displayed.
Revenues
Our revenues are derived primarily from food and beverage sales. Each segment contributed to
current year revenue growth as follows:
Bistro: The increase in revenues was attributable to revenues of $22.0 million generated by 20
new Bistro restaurants that opened during the first three quarters of 2007 and the last quarter
of 2006 combined with a full quarter of revenues for those stores that opened during the third
quarter of 2006. Revenue for stores that opened prior to the third quarter of 2006 experienced a
decline in overall guest traffic which resulted in lower sales volumes despite the benefit of a
two to three percent effective price increase.
Pei Wei: The increase in revenues was attributable to revenues of $14.6 million generated by the
40 new Pei Wei restaurants that opened during the first three quarters of 2007 and the last
quarter of 2006 combined with a full quarter of revenues for those stores that opened during the
third quarter of 2006. Revenue for stores that opened prior to the third quarter of 2006
experienced a decline in overall guest traffic which resulted in lower sales volumes.
In addition to the revenues earned by Bistro and Pei Wei, consolidated revenues include $0.6
million of revenues generated by our Taneko concept.
Costs and Expenses
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales is comprised of the cost of food and beverages. Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro increased slightly primarily
due to higher dry food expenses as well as the impact of our new
grill menu items. The increases were partially offset by lower seafood and pork expenses resulting from
favorable pricing, improved yields and increased purchasing through national distribution
contracts.
14
Pei Wei: Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei decreased primarily due to lower
produce expense resulting from the increase in product availability, favorable yields and the
number of products covered by contract pricing, as well as lower pork expense resulting from
favorable pricing and yields, partially offset by increased dry food expense.
Labor
Labor expenses consist of restaurant management salaries, hourly staff payroll costs, other
payroll-related items and imputed partner bonus expense. Imputed partner bonus expense represents
the portion of restaurant level operating results that are allocable to minority partners, but are
presented as bonus expense for accounting purposes. Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Labor expenses as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro increased primarily due to
wage rate pressure impacting all hourly labor categories, the impact of decreased leverage
resulting from lower average weekly sales on the portion of labor costs that are fixed by
nature, higher management incentive costs principally resulting from the 2007 change in the
Bistro partnership structure and increased health insurance costs. The impact of these factors
was partially offset by the benefit of reduced workers compensation insurance liabilities
resulting from lower than anticipated claims development.
Pei Wei: Labor expenses as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei increased primarily due to the
impact of wage rate pressure in culinary positions, increased management incentive costs and the
impact of decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales on the portion of labor
costs that are fixed by nature. The impact of these factors was partially offset by the benefit
of reduced workers compensation insurance liabilities resulting from lower than anticipated
claims development and decreased management salaries expense resulting from operational
efficiencies.
Operating
Operating expenses consist primarily of various restaurant-level costs such as repairs and
maintenance, utilities and marketing, certain of which are variable and fluctuate with revenues.
Our experience to date has been that operating costs during the first four to nine months of a
newly opened restaurant are materially greater than what can be expected after that time, both in
aggregate dollars and as a percentage of revenues. Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues at our Bistro restaurants increased
primarily due to higher repair and maintenance costs (including the impact of repair costs
related to a fire at our Nashville restaurant), higher disposable supplies expenses and to a
lesser extent, the impact of decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales on the
portion of operating costs that are fixed by nature.
Pei Wei: Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues at our Pei Wei restaurants were
consistent with the prior year primarily due to the impact of decreased leverage resulting from
lower average weekly sales on the portion of operating costs that are fixed by nature and an
increase in marketing spending, partially offset by a decrease in cleaning supply costs and
utilities expense.
Occupancy
Occupancy costs include both fixed and variable portions of rent, common area maintenance charges,
property and general liability insurance and property taxes. Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro increased slightly primarily
due to higher general liability insurance costs and the impact of decreased leverage resulting
from lower average weekly sales, partially offset by a slight decrease in property tax expense.
Pei Wei: Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei increased primarily due to the
impact of decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales and higher general
liability insurance costs, partially offset by a slight decrease in property tax expense.
15
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses are comprised of costs associated with corporate and
administrative functions that support restaurant development and operations and provide
infrastructure to support future growth, including management and staff salaries, employee
benefits, travel, legal and professional fees, technology and market research. Each segment
contributed as follows:
Bistro: General and administrative costs at the Bistro increased primarily due to an increase
in health insurance costs, increased travel-related expenses and, to a lesser extent, increased
management salaries due to the addition of regional partners and our new Bistro Chief Operating
Officer position, and higher management incentive accruals due to the impact of the 2007 change
in the Bistro partnership structure.
Pei Wei: General and administrative costs at Pei Wei increased primarily due to an increase in
compensation expense related to the addition of development and operating partners as well as
our new Pei Wei Chief Operating Officer position, increased health insurance costs and, to a
lesser extent, higher management incentive accruals, increased travel-related expenses and
higher share-based compensation expense.
Shared Services and Other: General and administrative costs for Shared Services and Other
increased $0.5 million principally due to higher compensation and benefits expense primarily
related to the addition of corporate management personnel, increased health and other employee
benefits costs, and, to a lesser extent, higher share-based compensation expense. The increase
was offset by the absence of incentive accruals in fiscal 2007.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses include the depreciation and amortization of fixed assets,
gains and losses on disposal of assets and the amortization of intangible assets and
non-transferable liquor license fees. Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Depreciation and amortization increased primarily due to additional depreciation and
amortization on restaurants opened during the last quarter of fiscal 2006 and the first three
quarters of fiscal 2007 and, to a lesser extent, costs related
to our new plateware and grill menu initiatives and higher intangible and other assets. The increase was partially offset by the impact of a change in the
amortization of non-transferable liquor license fees during the prior year. As a percentage of
revenues, depreciation and amortization increased due to higher average capital expenditures for
new restaurants and increased remodeling costs at existing restaurants.
Pei Wei: Depreciation and amortization increased primarily due to additional depreciation and
amortization on restaurants opened during the last quarter of fiscal 2006 and the first three
quarters of fiscal 2007. The increase was partially offset by the impact of a change in the
amortization of non-transferable liquor license fees during the prior year. As a percentage of
revenues, depreciation and amortization increased due to decreased leverage resulting from lower
average weekly sales and higher average capital expenditures for new restaurants.
Preopening Expense
Preopening expenses, which are expensed as incurred, consist of expenses incurred prior to opening
a new restaurant and are comprised principally of manager salaries and relocation costs, employee
payroll and related training costs. Preopening expenses also include straight-line rent expense for
the period between the possession date of leased premises and the restaurant opening date. Each
segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Preopening expense increased primarily due to the timing of expenses related to
restaurants scheduled to open during the fourth quarter of 2007 and early fiscal 2008 as well as
the impact of a greater number of restaurants scheduled to open during the first quarter of 2008
compared to the first quarter of 2007.
Pei Wei: Preopening expense increased primarily due to the impact of opening 11 new Pei Wei
restaurants during the third quarter of 2007 compared to nine new Pei Wei restaurants during the
third quarter of 2006, as well as the timing of expenses related to restaurants scheduled to
open during the fourth quarter of 2007 and early fiscal 2008 compared to the fourth quarter of
2006 and greater preopening rent expense due to earlier possession of new stores in fiscal 2007
as compared to fiscal 2006.
16
Partner Investment Expense
Partner investment expense represents the difference between the imputed fair value of our
partners ownership interests at the time the partners invest in their restaurants and our
partners cash contributions for those ownership interests. Additionally, for those partners who
are bought out prior to the restaurant reaching maturity (typically after five years of operation),
partner investment expense includes a reversal of previously recognized expense for the difference
between the fair value of the partners interest at inception date and the fair value at the date
of repurchase, to the extent that the former is greater. Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Partner investment expense at the Bistro decreased due to the change in partnership
structure discussed above, which led to a significant increase in buyouts of minority partner
interests during fiscal 2007. These buyouts resulted in a $0.4 million reversal during the
third quarter of previously recognized partner investment expense, due to the fair value of the
partners interest at inception date exceeding the fair value of the partners interest at
repurchase date. Additionally, as a result of the change in partnership structure, partner
investment expense is no longer recognized at the time a new restaurant opens.
Pei Wei: Partner investment expense at Pei Wei decreased primarily due to the impact in the
current quarter of expense reductions related to minority partner buyouts and, to a lesser
extent, the impact of a lower imputed fair value of partnership interests in new Pei Wei
restaurants in 2007. These items were partially offset by the impact of opening 11 new
restaurants during the third quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to opening nine new restaurants
during the third quarter of fiscal 2006.
Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net
Interest expense recognized during fiscal 2007 primarily consists of accretion expense related to
our conditional asset retirement obligations. Interest income earned during fiscal 2007 primarily
relates to interest-bearing overnight deposits.
Consolidated interest and other income (expense), net decreased primarily due to lower interest
income resulting from the sale of interest-bearing securities to finance our share repurchase
program, which commenced during the third quarter of fiscal 2006 (see Share Repurchase Program in
the Liquidity and Capital Resources section for further detail).
Minority Interest
Minority interest represents the portion of our net earnings which is attributable to the
collective ownership interests of our minority partners. As previously discussed, in many of our
restaurants we employ a partnership management structure whereby we have entered into a series of
partnership agreements with our regional managers, certain of our general managers, and certain of
our executive chefs. Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Minority interest as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro decreased due to the impact
of partner buyouts occurring during fiscal 2007. These buyouts reduced the number of minority
interests from 349 as of October 1, 2006 to 152 as of September 30, 2007.
Pei Wei: Minority interest as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei decreased slightly due to the
impact of lower restaurant net income and partner buyouts occurring during fiscal 2007.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 21.5% for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to 26.8% for the
third quarter of fiscal 2006. Disregarding the impact of reserve adjustments in both periods, our
effective tax rate was 26.3% and 27.5% for the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The income tax rates for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 differed
from the expected provision for income taxes, which is derived by applying the statutory income tax
rate, primarily as a result of FICA tip credits.
See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our adoption of FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109.
17
Results for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006
Our consolidated operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006
were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
802,695 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
685,618 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
117,077 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
220,018 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
187,679 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
32,339 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
Labor |
|
|
272,026 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
% |
|
|
228,526 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
43,500 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
% |
Operating |
|
|
127,629 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
107,433 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
20,196 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
46,548 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
38,589 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
7,959 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
49,903 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
41,930 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
7,973 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
41,140 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
32,504 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
8,636 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
% |
Preopening expense |
|
|
10,775 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
8,303 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
2,472 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
% |
Partner investment expense |
|
|
(1,940 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
%) |
|
|
2,612 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
(4,552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
766,099 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
% |
|
|
647,576 |
|
|
|
94.5 |
% |
|
|
118,523 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
36,596 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
38,042 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
%) |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
|
(63.5 |
%) |
Minority interest |
|
|
(3,576 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
%) |
|
|
(6,003 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
%) |
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes |
|
|
33,532 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
33,443 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(8,515 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
%) |
|
|
(8,955 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
25,017 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
$ |
24,488 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
$ |
529 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain percentage amounts may not sum to total due to rounding. Percentages over 100% not
displayed.
Operating results for the Bistro for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1,
2006 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
623,746 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
555,543 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
68,203 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
170,420 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
151,712 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
18,708 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
Labor |
|
|
209,085 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
% |
|
|
183,364 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
% |
|
|
25,721 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
Operating |
|
|
96,859 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
84,856 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
12,003 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
34,554 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
30,094 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
4,460 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
17,824 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
15,209 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
30,398 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
25,147 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
5,251 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
% |
Preopening expense |
|
|
6,020 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
4,996 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
% |
Partner investment expense |
|
|
(3,112 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
1,952 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
(5,064 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
562,048 |
|
|
|
90.1 |
% |
|
|
497,330 |
|
|
|
89.5 |
% |
|
|
64,718 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
61,698 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
58,213 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
3,485 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
%) |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(2,769 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
%) |
|
|
(5,203 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
%) |
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
46.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for
income taxes |
|
$ |
58,960 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
$ |
52,959 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
$ |
6,001 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain percentage amounts may not sum to total due to rounding. Percentages over 100% not
displayed.
18
Operating results for Pei Wei for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006
were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
177,043 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
130,075 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
46,968 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
% |
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
48,843 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
% |
|
|
35,967 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
12,876 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
% |
Labor |
|
|
61,874 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
|
45,162 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
16,712 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
% |
Operating |
|
|
30,221 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
22,577 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
7,644 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
% |
Occupancy |
|
|
11,830 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
8,495 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
3,335 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
9,250 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
7,060 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
2,190 |
|
|
|
31.0 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
9,404 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
6,497 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
% |
Preopening expense |
|
|
4,754 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
% |
Partner investment expense |
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
77.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
177,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,351 |
|
|
|
99.4 |
% |
|
|
47,997 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
%) |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
(1,029 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
%) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
|
|
(800 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
%) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
(1,118 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
%) |
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
%) |
|
$ |
(1,082 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain percentage amounts may not sum to total due to rounding. Percentages over 100% not
displayed.
Revenues
Each segment contributed to current year revenue growth as follows:
Bistro: The increase in revenues was attributable to revenues of $53.7 million generated by 20
new Bistro restaurants that opened during the first three quarters of 2007 and the last quarter
of 2006 combined with a full three quarters of revenues for those stores that opened during the
first three quarters of 2006. Revenue for stores that opened prior to 2006 experienced a decline
in overall guest traffic which resulted in lower sales volumes despite the benefit of a two to
three percent effective price increase.
Pei Wei: The increase in revenues was attributable to revenues of $31.7 million generated by the
40 new Pei Wei restaurants that opened during the first three quarters of 2007 and the last
quarter of 2006 combined with a full three quarters of revenues for those stores that opened
during the first three quarters of 2006. Revenue for stores that opened prior to 2006
experienced a decline in overall guest traffic which resulted in lower sales volumes despite the
benefit of a one to two percent effective price increase.
In addition to the revenues earned by Bistro and Pei Wei, consolidated revenues include $1.9
million of revenues generated by our Taneko concept.
Costs and Expenses
Cost of Sales
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro remained consistent primarily
due to lower seafood and pork expense resulting from favorable pricing, improved yields and
increased purchasing through national distribution contracts partially offset by higher produce
expense.
19
Pei Wei: Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei decreased slightly primarily due
to lower pork expense resulting from favorable pricing and yields and lower produce expense
resulting from the increase in product availability. This impact was partially offset by
increased dry food expense and the impact of an adjustment recorded during the second quarter of
2006 resulting from a modification of our accounting policy related to rebate accruals.
Labor
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Labor expenses as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro increased primarily due to
higher management incentive costs principally resulting from the 2007 change in the Bistro
partnership structure, wage rate pressure impacting all hourly labor categories and decreased
leverage on lower average weekly sales on the portion of labor costs that are fixed by nature.
The impact of these factors was partially offset by the benefit of reduced workers compensation
insurance liabilities resulting from lower than anticipated claims development.
Pei Wei: Labor expenses as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei increased primarily due to
continued wage rate pressure in culinary positions, increased management incentive costs, and
the impact of decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales on the portion of
labor costs that are fixed by nature, partially offset by the benefit of reduced workers
compensation insurance liabilities resulting from lower than anticipated claims development.
Operating
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues at our Bistro restaurants increased
slightly when considering an adjustment resulting from a modification of our accounting policy
related to utility accruals during the second quarter of 2006. Excluding the impact of this
adjustment, operating expenses as a percentage of revenues increased primarily due to higher
repair and maintenance costs (including the impact of repair costs related to a fire during the
third quarter at our Nashville restaurant), and disposable supplies expense as well as the
impact of decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales on the portion of
operating costs that are fixed by nature.
Pei Wei: Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues at our Pei Wei restaurants decreased
slightly including an adjustment resulting from a modification of our accounting policy related
to utility accruals during the second quarter of 2006. Excluding the impact of this adjustment,
operating expenses as a percentage of revenues increased primarily due to the impact of
decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales on the portion of operating costs
that are fixed by nature, and increase in marketing spending, partially offset by reduced
take-out supplies costs and other restaurant expenses.
Occupancy
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro increased slightly primarily
due to higher general liability insurance costs combined with the impact of decreased leverage
resulting from lower average weekly sales.
Pei Wei: Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei increased primarily due to the
impact of decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales combined with higher
general liability insurance costs.
General and Administrative
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: General and administrative costs at the Bistro increased primarily due to higher
management incentive accruals due to the impact of the 2007 change in the Bistro partnership
structure, an increase in health insurance costs, increased travel-related expenses and
increased management salaries due to the addition of regional partners and our new Bistro Chief
Operating Officer position.
20
Pei Wei: General and administrative costs at Pei Wei increased primarily due to an increase in
compensation and expense related to the addition of development and operating partners as well
as our new Pei Wei Chief Operating Officer position, increased health insurance costs, higher
management incentive accruals, and increased share-based compensation expense. As a percentage
of revenues, Pei Weis general and administrative costs decreased compared to the prior year due
primarily to the impact of a greater number of store openings in 2007.
Shared Services and Other: General and administrative costs for Shared Services and Other
increased $3.2 million principally due to higher compensation and benefits expense primarily
related to the addition of corporate management personnel, increased share-based compensation
expense and, to a lesser extent, higher consulting and marketing spending. The increase was
partially offset by the absence of incentive compensation accruals in fiscal 2007.
Depreciation and Amortization
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Depreciation and amortization increased primarily due to additional depreciation and
amortization on restaurants opened during the last quarter of fiscal 2006 and the first three
quarters of fiscal 2007 and, to a lesser extent, higher intangible
and other assets and costs related to our new plateware and grill
menu initiatives. As a percentage of revenues, depreciation and amortization
increased due to higher average capital expenditures for new restaurants and remodels as well as
the impact of decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales.
Pei Wei: Depreciation and amortization increased primarily due to additional depreciation and
amortization on restaurants opened during the last quarter of fiscal 2006 and the first three
quarters of fiscal 2007. As a percentage of revenues, depreciation and amortization increased
due to the impact of decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales, and higher
average capital expenditures for new restaurants.
Preopening Expense
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Preopening expense increased primarily due to the timing of expenses related to
restaurants scheduled to open during the fourth quarter of 2007 and early fiscal 2008 as well as
the impact of a greater number of restaurants scheduled to open during the first quarter of 2008
compared to the first quarter of 2007. Additionally, total preopening costs per restaurant
increased slightly during fiscal 2007 compared to the prior year.
Pei Wei: Preopening expense increased primarily due to the impact of opening 30 new Pei Wei
restaurants during the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 compared to 20 new Pei Wei
restaurants during the first three quarters of fiscal 2006, as well as an increase in preopening
expense related to unopened stores through the third quarter of each fiscal year.
Partner Investment Expense
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Partner investment expense at the Bistro decreased due to the change in partnership
structure discussed above, which led to a significant increase in early buyouts of minority
partner interests during fiscal 2007. These early buyouts resulted in a $3.1 million reversal
of previously recognized partner investment expense due to the fair value of the partners
interest at inception date exceeding the fair value of the partners interest at repurchase
date. Additionally, as a result of the change in partnership structure, partner investment
expense is no longer recognized at the time a new restaurant opens.
Pei Wei: Partner investment expense at Pei Wei increased primarily due to the impact of
opening 30 new restaurants during the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 compared to opening
20 new restaurants during the first three quarters of fiscal 2006, as well as higher expense
reductions related to minority partner buyouts. These increases were partially offset by the
impact of a lower imputed fair value of partnership interests in new Pei Wei restaurants in
fiscal 2007.
21
Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net
Consolidated interest and other income (expense), net decreased primarily due to lower interest
income resulting from the sale of interest-bearing securities to finance our share repurchase
program, which commenced during the third quarter of fiscal 2006 (see Share Repurchase Program in
the Liquidity and Capital Resources section for further detail). Interest income earned during
2007 primarily relates to interest-bearing overnight deposits.
Minority Interest
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Minority interest as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro decreased due to the impact
of partner buyouts occurring during fiscal 2007. These buyouts reduced the number of minority
interests from 349 as of October 1, 2006 to 152 minority interests as of September 30, 2007.
Pei Wei: Minority interest as a percentage of revenues at Pei Wei decreased due to the impact
of lower restaurant net income and partner buyouts occurring during the first three quarters of
fiscal 2007.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate was 25.4 % for the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 compared to 26.8% for
the first three quarters of fiscal 2006. Disregarding the impact of reserve adjustments in both
periods, our effective tax rate was 26.3% and 27.5% for the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 and
2006, respectively. The income tax rates for the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 and fiscal
2006 differed from the expected provision for income taxes, which is derived by applying the
statutory income tax rate, primarily as a result of FICA tip credits.
See Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our adoption of FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxesan interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Our primary source of liquidity is cash provided by operations, though we also borrow under our
credit facility from time to time. Historically, our need for capital resources has primarily
resulted from our construction of new restaurants. Our need for capital resources was also driven
by the purchase of minority interests in fiscal 2007 and the repurchase of our common stock and Pei
Wei minority interests in fiscal 2006
The following table presents a summary of our cash flows for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 and October 1, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
October 1, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
84,241 |
|
|
$ |
73,722 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(128,913 |
) |
|
|
(38,410 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
17,707 |
|
|
|
(52,688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(26,965 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Operating Activities
We have funded our capital requirements since inception through sales of equity securities, debt
financing and cash flows from operations. Net cash provided by operating activities was $84.2
million and $73.7 million for the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. Net
cash provided by operating activities exceeded net income for the periods due principally to the
effect of depreciation and amortization, an increase in operating liabilities, share-based
compensation, the effect of minority interest and partnership-related non-cash expenses.
Investing Activities
We use cash primarily to fund the development and construction of new restaurants. Net cash used in
investing activities during the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 and 2006 was $128.9 million and
$38.4 million, respectively. Included in investing activities were capital expenditures of $115.9
million and $78.6 million for the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006,
respectively. Capital expenditures during the current year increased compared to the prior year
primarily due to a higher number of new restaurant openings.
We intend to open 20 new Bistro restaurants, and 37 new Pei Wei restaurants in fiscal year 2007, of
which 10 Bistro and 30 Pei Wei restaurants were open by the end of the third quarter. We expect
that our planned future Bistro restaurants will require, on average, a total cash investment per
restaurant of approximately $2.8 million to $3.0 million. We expect to spend approximately $365,000
per restaurant for preopening costs, which excludes non-cash preopening rent expense of
approximately $50,000. Total cash investment per each Pei Wei restaurant is expected to average
$750,000 to $850,000 and we expect to spend $113,000 per restaurant for preopening costs, which
excludes non-cash preopening rent expense of approximately $27,000. The anticipated total cash
investment per restaurant is based on recent historical averages which have increased over prior
years due to increases in construction related costs of steel, aluminum and lumber. We expect
total capital expenditures for fiscal 2007 to approximate $135.0 million.
Investment activities also include purchases of minority interests of $11.7 million and $1.6
million during the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 and 2006. We purchased 230 partnership
interests during the first three quarters of 2007. This represents a significant increase in the
historical rate of purchases resulting primarily from the implementation of our new Bistro
partnership structure at the beginning of the current year and the corresponding desire of many of
our existing partners to sell their partnership interest and instead participate in our new
management incentive compensation program.
Additionally, investment activities in the first three quarters of fiscal 2006 included the impact
of net sales of short-term investments totaling $42.4 million.
Financing Activities
Financing activities during the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 and 2006 included proceeds from
stock options exercised and employee stock purchases, distributions to minority partners, debt
repayments and the tax benefit from disqualifying stock option dispositions. Additionally,
financing activities during the first three quarters of fiscal 2007 included $41.0 million of
credit line borrowings and $30.0 million of debt repayments, including $23.0 million related to our
credit line and $7.0 million related to debt resulting from prior minority interest purchases.
Financing activities during the first three quarters of fiscal 2006 included $39.5 million in
treasury stock purchases and $7.3 million related to the purchase of Pei Wei minority interests.
Future capital requirements
Our capital requirements, including development costs related to the opening of additional
restaurants, have been and will continue to be significant. Our future capital requirements and the
adequacy of our available funds will depend on many factors, including the pace of expansion, real
estate markets, site locations, the nature of the arrangements negotiated with landlords and any
potential repurchases of our common stock. We believe that our cash flow from operations, together
with our current cash reserves and available credit lines, will be sufficient to fund our projected
capital requirements through 2008 and the foreseeable future. In the unlikely event that additional
capital is required, we may seek to raise such capital through public or private equity or debt
financing. Future capital funding transactions may result in dilution to current shareholders. We
cannot ensure that such capital will be available on favorable terms, if at all.
23
Credit Facility
On August 31, 2007, we entered into a senior credit facility (Credit Facility) with several
commercial financial institutions, which allows for borrowings of up to $150.0 million. Borrowings
under the Credit Facility bear interest, at our option, at a rate equal to either (i) LIBOR plus an
applicable margin as defined in the Credit Facility or (ii) the higher of (a) the Federal Funds
Effective Rate plus one-half of 1.0% or (b) the Prime Rate as announced by JPMorgan Chase Bank.
The Credit Facility bears a commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolver at an annual rate
of 0.125%.
The Credit Facility expires on August 30, 2013 and contains customary representations, warranties,
negative and affirmative covenants, including a requirement to maintain a maximum leverage ratio of
2.5:1 and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25:1, as well as customary events of default
and certain default provisions that could result in acceleration of the Credit Facility. We were
in compliance with these restrictions and conditions as of September 30, 2007.
The Credit Facility is guaranteed by our material existing and future domestic subsidiaries.
As of September 30, 2007, we had borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility totaling $30.0
million at an average interest rate of 6.50% as well as $9.7 million committed for the issuance of
letters of credit, which is required by insurance companies for our workers compensation and
general liability insurance programs. Available borrowings under the Credit Facility were $110.3
million at September 30, 2007.
Share Repurchase Program
In July 2006, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $50.0 million of our
outstanding shares of common stock from time to time in the open market or in private at prevailing
market prices over a one-year period. We repurchased 1.4 million shares of our common stock for
$46.4 million during fiscal 2006 and we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during
fiscal 2007. The remaining $3.6 million available under this share repurchase authorization
expired in July 2007.
In July 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a subsequent program to repurchase up to $50.0
million of our outstanding shares of common stock from time to time in the open market or in
private at prevailing market prices over the next two years. We intend to use cash on hand and
available credit lines to repurchase shares. We did not repurchase any shares under this
authorization during the third quarter of fiscal 2007.
Partnership Activities
As of September 30, 2007, there were 125 partners within the P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc.
partnership system. During the first three quarters of fiscal 2007, we had the opportunity to
purchase 31 partner interests which had reached the five-year threshold period, as well as 219
additional partner interests which had either (i) reached the end of their initial five-year term
in prior years, (ii) related to partners who left the company prior to the initial five-year term
or (iii) related to Bistro partners who elected an early repurchase of their minority interest by
the company due to the opportunity to participate in the new Bistro management incentive
compensation program. We purchased 230 of these interests in their entirety for a total of $23.0
million. Of the total purchase price, approximately $11.7 million was paid in cash, while the
remaining balance has been recorded as debt, some of which is payable to related parties, on the
consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2007.
24
Minority Interest Purchase
On January 9, 2006, we purchased the 13 percent minority interest held by key employees in our Pei
Wei Asian Diner subsidiary for a value of approximately $22.8 million, thereby making Pei Wei Asian
Diner a wholly owned subsidiary. The purchase price consideration consisted of $7.3 million in cash
and the conversion of outstanding options to purchase 98,100 shares of Pei Wei Asian Diner, Inc.
common stock into options to purchase 306,782 shares of P.F. Changs common stock. There was no
additional intrinsic value associated with the converted options to purchase P.F. Changs common
stock for the key employees. The transaction did not involve any changes in management or key
positions in Pei Wei.
New Accounting Standards
See Recent Accounting Pronouncements section of Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for
a summary of new accounting standards.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We are exposed to market risk primarily from fluctuations in interest rates on our short-term
investments and revolving credit facility. Our revolving credit facility allows for borrowings up
to $150.0 million bearing interest at variables rates of LIBOR plus an applicable margin. We held
no short-term investments at December 31, 2006. We had borrowings of $30.0 million outstanding
under our credit facility and promissory notes totaling $12.1 million at September 30, 2007. A
hypothetical 100 basis point change in interest rates would not have a material impact on our
results of operations.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
During the last fiscal quarter, there have been no significant changes in our internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect our internal control over financial reporting.
25
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
None
Risks that could have a negative impact on our business, revenues and performance results include
risks associated with the following: failure of our existing or new restaurants to achieve
predicted results; the inability to develop and construct our restaurants within projected budgets
and time periods; our ability to successfully expand our operations; increases in the minimum wage;
intense competition in the restaurant industry; changes in general economic and political
conditions that affect consumer spending; fluctuations in operating results; our inability to
retain key personnel; failure to comply with governmental regulations; future changes in financial
accounting standards; changes in how we account for certain aspects of our partnership program;
strain on our management resources resulting from implementing our growth strategy; potential labor
shortages that may delay planned openings; changes in food costs; rising insurance costs;
litigation; and expenses associated with compliance with changing regulation of corporate
governance and public disclosure. A more detailed description of each of these risk factors can be
found under the caption Risk Factors in our most recent Form 10-K, filed on February 14, 2007.
There have been no material changes to these risk factors other than the change of the following.
Failure to comply with governmental regulations could harm our business and our reputation.
We are subject to regulation by federal agencies and to licensing and regulation by state and local
health, sanitation, building, zoning, safety, fire and other departments relating to the
development and operation of restaurants. These regulations include matters relating to:
|
|
|
the environment; |
|
|
|
|
building construction; |
|
|
|
|
zoning requirements; |
|
|
|
|
the preparation and sale of food and alcoholic beverages; and |
|
|
|
|
employment. |
Our facilities are licensed and subject to regulation under state and local fire, health and safety
codes. The development and construction of additional restaurants will be subject to compliance
with applicable zoning, land use and environmental regulations. We may not be able to obtain
necessary licenses or other approvals on a cost-effective and timely basis in order to construct
and develop restaurants in the future.
Various federal and state labor laws govern our operations and our relationship with our employees,
including minimum wage, overtime, working conditions, fringe benefit and citizenship requirements.
In particular, we are subject to the regulations of the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration
Services, or BCIS. The United States Congress has recently been considering changes to Federal
immigration laws and various states are also in the process of considering or have already adopted
new immigration laws. Some of these new laws may adversely affect our operations by increasing our
obligations for compliance and oversight. Though we require all workers to provide us with the
government-specified documentation evidencing their employment eligibility, some of our employees
may, without our knowledge, be unauthorized workers. Unauthorized workers are subject to seizure
and deportation and may subject us to fines, penalties or loss of our business license in certain
jurisdictions. Any material disruption of our business, as a result of seizure of our workers,
changes in immigration law, or significantly increased labor costs at our facilities in the future,
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
26
Our business can be adversely affected by negative publicity resulting from complaints or
litigation alleging poor food quality, food-borne illness or other health concerns or operating
issues stemming from one or a limited number of restaurants. Unfavorable publicity could taint
public perception of our restaurants.
Approximately 15 percent of our revenues at the Bistro and two percent of revenues at Pei Wei are
attributable to the sale of alcoholic beverages. We are required to comply with the alcohol
licensing requirements of the federal government, states and municipalities where our restaurants
are located. Alcoholic beverage control regulations require applications to state authorities and,
in certain locations, county and municipal authorities for a license and permit to sell alcoholic
beverages. Typically, licenses must be renewed annually and may be revoked or suspended for cause
at any time. Alcoholic beverage control regulations relate to numerous aspects of the daily
operations of the restaurants, including minimum age of guests and employees, hours of operation,
advertising, wholesale purchasing, inventory control and handling, storage and dispensing of
alcoholic beverages. If we fail to comply with federal, state or local regulations, our licenses
may be revoked and we may be forced to terminate the sale of alcoholic beverages at one or more of
our restaurants.
The federal Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in
public accommodations and employment. We are required to comply with the Americans with
Disabilities Act and regulations relating to accommodating the needs of the disabled in connection
with the construction of new facilities and with significant renovations of existing facilities.
Failure to comply with these and other regulations could negatively impact our business and our
reputation.
Changes in food costs could negatively impact our revenues and results of operations.
Our profitability is dependent in part on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in food
costs. Other than for a portion of our commodities, like produce, which is purchased locally by
each restaurant and certain other specialty items that we purchase from Chinese import/export
brokers, we rely on Distribution Market Advantage as the primary distributor of our ingredients.
Distribution Market Advantage is a cooperative of multiple food distributors located throughout the
nation. We have a non-exclusive contract with Distribution Market Advantage on terms and conditions
which we believe are consistent with those made available to similarly situated restaurant
companies. Although we believe that alternative distribution sources are available, any increase in
distribution prices or failure to perform by the Distribution Market Advantage could cause our food
costs to fluctuate. Any disruption in the supply of specialty items from China due to quality or
availability issues could also cause our food costs to fluctuate. Additional factors beyond our
control, including adverse weather conditions and governmental regulation, may affect our food
costs. We may not be able to anticipate and react to changing food costs through our purchasing
practices and menu price adjustments in the future, and failure to do so could negatively impact
our revenues and results of operations.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
None
27
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description Document |
3(i)(1) |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. |
3(ii)(3) |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws. |
4.1(2) |
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate. |
4.2(2) |
|
Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated May 1, 1997 |
10.27 |
|
Credit Agreement between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank Dated August 31, 2007.
|
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for
Richard L. Federico. |
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Mark
D. Mumford. |
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for
Richard L. Federico. |
32.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Mark
D. Mumford. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on April
25, 2002. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-59749). |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to
the Registrants Form 8-K filed on October 25, 2007. |
28
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.F. CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ RICHARD L. FEDERICO
|
|
|
|
Richard L. Federico |
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ MARK D. MUMFORD
|
|
|
|
Mark D. Mumford |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
|
|
Date:
October 26, 2007
29
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description Document |
3(i)(1) |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. |
3(ii)(3) |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws. |
4.1(2) |
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate. |
4.2(2) |
|
Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated May 1, 1997. |
10.27 |
|
Credit Agreement between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank Dated August 31, 2007. |
31.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for
Richard L. Federico. |
31.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Mark
D. Mumford. |
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for
Richard L. Federico. |
32.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Mark
D. Mumford. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on April
25, 2002. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-59749). |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to
the Registrants Form 8-K filed on October 25, 2007. |
30