CKH-3.31.2012-10Q
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 ________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
________________________________________ 
(Mark One)
ý
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012              or             
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from              to             
Commission file number 1-12289
SEACOR Holdings Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
________________________________________ 
Delaware
 
13-3542736
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
2200 Eller Drive, P.O. Box 13038,
 
 
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
 
33316
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(Zip Code)
954-523-2200
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Not Applicable
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
________________________________________ 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  ý     No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer  x
 
Accelerated filer  ¨
 
Non-accelerated filer  ¨
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ¨    No  ý
The total number of shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding as of April 27, 2012 was 21,122,654. The Registrant has no other class of common stock outstanding.


Table of Contents

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.
Table of Contents
 
Part I.
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
Part II.
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
 
 
Item 6.



Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data, unaudited)
 
March 31,
2012
 
December 31,
2011
ASSETS
 
 
 
Current Assets:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
281,977

 
$
462,188

Restricted cash
25,958

 
21,281

Marketable securities
68,586

 
66,898

Receivables:
 
 
 
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,805 and $3,652 in 2012 and 2011, respectively
299,484

 
303,843

Other
41,699

 
51,793

Inventories
94,329

 
69,109

Deferred income taxes
11,123

 
11,123

Prepaid expenses and other
11,384

 
9,323

Discontinued operations
4,019

 
44,989

Total current assets
838,559

 
1,040,547

Property and Equipment
3,314,759

 
3,018,145

Accumulated depreciation
(905,362
)
 
(867,914
)
Net property and equipment
2,409,397

 
2,150,231

Investments, at Equity, and Advances to 50% or Less Owned Companies
220,772

 
249,753

Construction Reserve Funds & Title XI Reserve Funds
259,926

 
259,974

Goodwill
57,054

 
57,054

Intangible Assets, Net
22,132

 
21,528

Other Assets
99,113

 
102,348

Discontinued Operations

 
46,699

 
$
3,906,953

 
$
3,928,134

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
Current Liabilities:
 
 
 
Current portion of long-term debt
$
22,078

 
$
41,091

Current portion of capital lease obligations
2,289

 
2,368

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
142,410

 
185,156

Other current liabilities
176,558

 
150,864

Discontinued operations
650

 
22,047

Total current liabilities
343,985

 
401,526

Long-Term Debt
976,872

 
995,450

Capital Lease Obligations
2,848

 
3,068

Deferred Income Taxes
576,195

 
566,920

Deferred Gains and Other Liabilities
135,695

 
143,390

Discontinued Operations

 
9,717

Total liabilities
2,035,595

 
2,120,071

Equity:
 
 
 
SEACOR Holdings Inc. stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued nor outstanding

 

Common stock, $.01 par value, 60,000,000 shares authorized; 36,603,406 and 36,444,439 shares issued in 2012 and 2011, respectively
366

 
364

Additional paid-in capital
1,265,708

 
1,256,209

Retained earnings
1,549,167

 
1,512,679

Shares held in treasury of 15,489,052 and 15,511,323 in 2012 and 2011, respectively, at cost
(970,023
)
 
(971,687
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
(5,369
)
 
(7,958
)
 
1,839,849

 
1,789,607

Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
31,509

 
18,456

Total equity
1,871,358

 
1,808,063

 
$
3,906,953

 
$
3,928,134

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
and should be read in conjunction herewith.


1

Table of Contents

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except share data, unaudited)
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
Operating Revenues
$
497,885

 
$
438,011

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
Operating
384,112

 
341,743

Administrative and general
46,178

 
41,654

Depreciation and amortization
39,327

 
38,330

 
469,617

 
421,727

Gains on Asset Dispositions and Impairments, Net
5,542

 
7,255

Operating Income
33,810

 
23,539

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
Interest income
2,976

 
3,732

Interest expense
(12,024
)
 
(10,040
)
Debt extinguishment losses, net
(160
)
 
(48
)
Marketable security gains, net
3,358

 
1,534

Derivative losses, net
(4,119
)
 
(3,318
)
Foreign currency gains, net
2,552

 
5,059

Other, net
(54
)
 
(178
)
 
(7,471
)
 
(3,259
)
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Tax Expense and Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies
26,339

 
20,280

Income Tax Expense
10,608

 
7,673

Income from Continuing Operations Before Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies
15,731

 
12,607

Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
1,242

 
42

Income from Continuing Operations
16,973

 
12,649

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
19,400

 
(1,180
)
Net Income
36,373

 
11,469

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries
(115
)
 
299

Net Income attributable to SEACOR Holdings Inc.
$
36,488

 
$
11,170

 
 
 
 
Net Income (Loss) attributable to SEACOR Holdings Inc.:
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
17,088

 
$
12,350

Discontinued operations
19,400

 
(1,180
)
 
$
36,488

 
$
11,170

Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share of SEACOR Holdings Inc.:
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
0.83

 
$
0.59

Discontinued operations
0.95

 
(0.06
)
 
$
1.78

 
$
0.53

Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share of SEACOR Holdings Inc.:
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
0.82

 
$
0.58

Discontinued operations
0.93

 
(0.06
)
 
$
1.75

 
$
0.52

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
 
 
 
Basic
20,519,660

 
21,104,739

Diluted
20,893,210

 
21,439,424

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
and should be read in conjunction herewith.

2

Table of Contents

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands, except share data, unaudited)
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2012
 
2011
Net Income
 
$
36,373

 
$
11,469

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
3,200

 
1,374

Reclassification of net foreign currency translation losses to foreign currency gains, net
 
758

 

Derivative losses on cash flow hedges
 
(500
)
 
(99
)
Reclassification of net derivative losses on cash flow hedges to interest expense or equity in earnings of 50% or less owned companies
 
734

 
748

Other
 
42

 

 
 
4,234

 
2,023

Income tax expense
 
(1,394
)
 
(708
)
 
 
2,840

 
1,315

Comprehensive Income
 
39,213

 
12,784

Comprehensive Income attributable to Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries
 
136

 
299

Comprehensive Income attributable to SEACOR Holdings Inc.
 
$
39,077

 
$
12,485



















The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
and should be read in conjunction herewith.


3

Table of Contents


SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(in thousands, unaudited)
 
SEACOR Holdings Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
 
Non-
Controlling
Interests In
Subsidiaries
 
Total
Equity
 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Shares
Held In
Treasury
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
December 31, 2011
$
364

 
$
1,256,209

 
$
1,512,679

 
$
(971,687
)
 
$
(7,958
)
 
$
18,456

 
$
1,808,063

Issuance of common stock:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

 

 
1,696

 

 

 
1,696

Exercise of stock options
1

 
3,174

 

 

 

 

 
3,175

Director stock awards

 
97

 

 

 

 

 
97

Restricted stock and restricted stock units
1

 
388

 

 
(32
)
 

 

 
357

Amortization of share awards

 
5,840

 

 

 

 

 
5,840

Acquisition of subsidiary with noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 
13,250

 
13,250

Issuance of noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 
83

 
83

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests

 

 

 

 

 
(416
)
 
(416
)
Net income (loss)

 

 
36,488

 

 

 
(115
)
 
36,373

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 
2,589

 
251

 
2,840

Three months ended March 31, 2012
$
366

 
$
1,265,708

 
$
1,549,167

 
$
(970,023
)
 
$
(5,369
)
 
$
31,509

 
$
1,871,358


































The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
and should be read in conjunction herewith.

4

Table of Contents


SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands, unaudited)
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities of Continuing Operations
$
49,580

 
$
92,556

Cash Flows from Investing Activities of Continuing Operations:
 
 
 
Purchases of property and equipment
(119,604
)
 
(63,338
)
Proceeds from disposition of property and equipment
5,818

 
13,632

Cash settlements on derivative transactions, net
(98
)
 
3,314

Investments in and advances to 50% or less owned companies
(13,546
)
 
(8,708
)
Return of investments and advances from 50% or less owned companies
2,442

 
2,674

Net advances on revolving credit line to 50% or less owned companies
(300
)
 
(3,728
)
Principal payments on third party notes receivable, net
3,713

 
545

Net increase in restricted cash
(4,677
)
 
(6,894
)
Net (increase) decrease in construction reserve funds and title XI reserve funds
48

 
(7,804
)
Net increase in escrow deposits on like-kind exchanges

 
(4,047
)
Repayments on leases, net
955

 
1,373

Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
(148,139
)
 

Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations
(273,388
)
 
(72,981
)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities of Continuing Operations:
 
 
 
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations
(61,017
)
 
(3,081
)
Net borrowings (repayments) on inventory financing arrangements
(17,312
)
 
3,488

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
38,069

 

Proceeds and tax benefits from share award plans
5,261

 
4,633

Cash received from (dividends paid to) noncontrolling interests, net
(333
)
 
597

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of continuing operations
(35,332
)
 
5,637

Effects of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents
2,185

 
3,554

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents from Continuing Operations
(256,955
)
 
28,766

Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations:
 
 
 
Operating Activities
(11,815
)
 
13,471

Investing Activities
88,532

 
(1,758
)
Effects of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents
27

 
10

Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents from Discontinued Operations
76,744

 
11,723

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
(180,211
)
 
40,489

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period
462,188

 
365,329

Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period
$
281,977

 
$
405,818

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
and should be read in conjunction herewith.

5

Table of Contents

SEACOR HOLDINGS INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
 
1.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICY

The condensed consolidated financial information for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 has been prepared by the Company and has not been audited by its independent registered public accounting firm. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SEACOR Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made to fairly present the Company’s financial position as of March 31, 2012, its results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, its comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, its changes in equity for the three months ended March 31, 2012, and its cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. Results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the full year or any future periods.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States have been condensed or omitted. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Unless the context otherwise indicates, any reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the “Company” refers to SEACOR Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and any reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “SEACOR” refers to SEACOR Holdings Inc.

Discontinued Operations. On March 16, 2012, the Company sold certain companies and assets of its Environmental Services business segment for a net sales price of $99.9 million and recognized a gain of $20.7 million, net of tax, or $0.99 per diluted share. The Company has no continuing involvement in the business sold, although the sales agreement provides that the Company may receive contingent consideration equal to a portion of the revenue generated by any extraordinary oil spill response that occurs within three years following the date of sale. As a result, the Company has reported, for all periods presented, the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the sold business as discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The remaining business in the segment was renamed Emergency and Crisis Services.

Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. Revenue is realized or realizable and earned when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue that does not meet these criteria is deferred until the criteria are met. Deferred revenues, included in other current liabilities, for the three months ended March 31 were as follows (in thousands): 
 
2012
 
2011
Balance at beginning of period
$
9,968

 
$
21,045

Revenues deferred during the period
4,050

 
263

Revenues recognized during the period
(4,700
)
 
(2,554
)
Balance at end of period
$
9,318

 
$
18,754


As of March 31, 2012, deferred revenues included $6.3 million relating to the time charter of several offshore support vessels operating in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico that are scheduled to be paid through the conveyance of a limited net profit interest in developmental oil and gas producing properties owned by a customer. Payments from the conveyance of the limited net profit interest, and the timing of such payments, are contingent upon production and energy sale prices. Based on the current production payout estimate, the deferred revenues are expected to be paid through mid-2012. The Company expects to defer an additional $0.8 million of vessel charter hire under this arrangement through December 2012. The Company will continue to recognize revenues as cash is received or earlier should future payments become determinable. All costs and expenses related to these charters were recognized as incurred.


6

Table of Contents

As of March 31, 2012, deferred revenues also included $2.8 million related to contract-lease revenues for certain helicopters leased by Aviation Services to Aeroleo Taxi Aero S/A ("Aeroleo"), its Brazilian joint venture (see Note 6). The deferral resulted from difficulties experienced by Aeroleo following one of its customer's cancellation of certain contracts for a number of AW139 aircraft under contract-lease from Aviation Services. The Company will recognize revenues as cash is received or earlier should future collectability become reasonably assured. All costs and expenses related to these contract-leases were recognized as incurred.

Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications of prior period information have been made to conform to the presentation of the current period information. These reclassifications had no effect on net income as previously reported.


2.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The fair value of an asset or liability is the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company utilizes a fair value hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value and defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or inputs derived from observable market data. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2012 that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands):
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
Marketable securities(1)
$
30,563

 
$
38,023

 
$

Derivative instruments (included in other receivables)
319

 
2,040

 

Construction reserve funds and Title XI reserve funds
259,926

 

 

LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
 
Short sale of marketable securities (included in other current liabilities)
24,761

 

 

Derivative instruments (included in other current liabilities)
3,011

 
8,154

 

 ______________________
(1)
Marketable security gains (losses), net include gains of $2.6 million and losses of $3.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to marketable security positions held by the Company as of March 31, 2012.

As of March 31, 2012, the Company's Level 2 marketable securities included a $33.1 million investment in 9.25% Senior Secured Notes (the “Notes”) due from Trailer Bridge, Inc. (“Trailer Bridge”). The Company held a 50.9% interest in the total outstanding Notes. Trailer Bridge filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida (the “Bankruptcy Court”) on November 16, 2011. On March 16, 2012, the Bankruptcy court confirmed Trailer Bridge's second amended restructuring plan, which provided for a majority of the Note holders, including the Company, to receive a pro rata share of a new $65.0 million debt instrument and a pro rata share of at least 91% of the equity interest in the newly restructured company. Existing common shareholders had the option to receive a 9% equity interest in the newly restructured company or a cash payment of $0.15 per share. The restructuring plan was implemented on April 2, 2012 resulting in the Company obtaining a 47.3% ownership interest in the newly restructured company after the exercise of the existing common shareholders' option.

7

Table of Contents

The estimated fair value of the Company’s other financial assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2012 were as follows (in thousands): 
 
 
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
$
307,935

 
$
307,935

 
$

 
$

Investments, at cost, in 50% or less owned companies (included in other assets)
9,315

 
see below
 
 
 
 
Notes receivable from other business ventures (included in other receivables and other assets)
57,054

 
see below
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term debt, including current portion
998,950

 

 
1,028,047

 


The carrying value of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash approximates fair value. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was estimated based upon quoted market prices or by using discounted cash flow analyses based on estimated current rates for similar types of arrangements. It was not practicable to estimate the fair value of the Company’s investments, at cost, in 50% or less owned companies because of the lack of quoted market prices and the inability to estimate fair value without incurring excessive costs. It was not practicable to estimate the fair value of the Company’s notes receivable from other business ventures as the overall returns are uncertain due to certain provisions for additional payments contingent upon future events. Considerable judgment was required in developing certain of the estimates of fair value and, accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange.

The Company’s non-financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value during the three months ended March 31, 2012 were as follows (in thousands): 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
Investment in Illinois Corn Processing LLC(1)
$

 
$
30,916

 
$

 ______________________
(1)
During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company marked its equity investment in its Illinois Corn Processing LLC ("ICP") joint venture to fair value following the acquisition of a controlling interest (see Note 6). The investment's fair value was determined based on a fair value analysis of the assets and liabilities of ICP.


3.
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING STRATEGIES

Derivative instruments are classified as either assets or liabilities based on their individual fair values. Derivative assets and liabilities are included in other receivables and other current liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments as of March 31, 2012 were as follows (in thousands): 
 
Derivative
Asset
 
Derivative
Liability
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
Interest rate swap agreements (cash flow hedges)
$

 
$
4,681

 

 
4,681

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
Options on equities and equity indices
369

 
646

Forward currency exchange, option and future contracts
427

 
282

Interest rate swap agreements

 
3,075

Commodity swap, option and future contracts:
 
 
 
Exchange traded
319

 
2,259

Non-exchange traded
1,244

 
222

 
2,359

 
6,484

 
$
2,359

 
$
11,165


8

Table of Contents

Fair Value Hedges. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company utilized forward currency exchange contracts designated as fair value hedges to fix a portion of its euro-denominated capital commitments in U.S. dollars to protect against currency fluctuations. As of March 31, 2012, there were no forward currency exchange contracts designated as fair value hedges.

The Company recognized gains (losses) on derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges for the three months ended March 31 as follows (in thousands):
 
Derivative losses, net
 
2012
 
2011
Forward currency exchange contracts, effective and ineffective portions
$

 
$
4,684

Decrease in fair value of hedged items included in property and equipment corresponding to effective portion of derivative gains

 
(4,684
)
 
$

 
$


Cash Flow Hedges. As of March 31, 2012, the Company is a party to various interest rate swap agreements, with maturities ranging from 2013 to 2014, which have been designated as cash flow hedges. These agreements call for the Company to pay fixed interest rates ranging from 2.25% to 2.85% on aggregate notional values of $125.0 million and receive a variable interest rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) on these notional values. As of March 31, 2012, one of the Company’s Offshore Marine Services 50% or less owned companies had an interest rate swap agreement maturing in 2015 that has been designated as a cash flow hedge. This instrument calls for the joint venture to pay a fixed interest rate of 1.48% on the amortized notional value of $19.2 million and receive a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on the amortized notional value. In addition, as of March 31, 2012, one of the Company’s Inland River Services 50% or less owned companies had four interest rate swap agreements with maturities ranging from 2013 to 2015 that have been designated as cash flow hedges. These instruments call for the joint venture to pay fixed rates of interest ranging from 1.53% to 4.16% on the aggregate amortized notional value of $53.7 million and receive a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on the aggregate amortized notional value. By entering into these interest rate swap agreements, the Company and its joint ventures have converted the variable LIBOR component of certain of their outstanding borrowings to a fixed interest rate.

The Company recognized gains (losses) on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges for the three months ended March 31 as follows (in thousands): 
 
Other comprehensive income
 
Derivative losses, net
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
Interest rate swap agreements, effective portion
$
(500
)
 
$
(99
)
 
$

 
$

Interest rate swap agreements, ineffective portion

 

 
(28
)
 
(79
)
Reclassification of derivative losses to interest expense or equity in earnings of 50% or less owned companies
734

 
748

 

 

 
$
234

 
$
649

 
$
(28
)
 
$
(79
)

Other Derivative Instruments. The Company recognized gains (losses) on derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments for the three months ended March 31 as follows (in thousands):
 
Derivative losses, net
 
2012
 
2011
Options on equities and equity indices
$
(1,212
)
 
$
(263
)
Forward currency exchange, option and future contracts
583

 
418

Interest rate swap agreements
(334
)
 
321

Commodity swap, option and future contracts:
 
 
 
Exchange traded
(1,427
)
 
(3,127
)
Non-exchange traded
(1,701
)
 
(452
)
U.S. Treasury notes, rate-locks and bond future and option contracts

 
(136
)
 
$
(4,091
)
 
$
(3,239
)


9

Table of Contents

The Company holds positions in publicly traded equity options that convey the right or obligation to engage in a future transaction on the underlying equity security or index. The Company’s investment in equity options primarily includes positions in energy, marine, transportation and other related businesses. These contracts are typically entered into to mitigate the risk of changes in the market value of marketable security positions that the Company is either about to acquire, has acquired or is about to dispose of.

The Company enters and settles forward currency exchange, option and future contracts with respect to various foreign currencies. As of March 31, 2012, the outstanding forward currency exchange contracts translated into a net purchase of foreign currencies with an aggregate U.S. dollar equivalent of $47.9 million. These contracts enable the Company to buy currencies in the future at fixed exchange rates, which could offset possible consequences of changes in currency exchange rates with respect to the Company’s business conducted outside of the United States. The Company generally does not enter into contracts with forward settlement dates beyond twelve to eighteen months.

The Company has entered into various interest rate swap agreements with maturities ranging from 2012 through 2015 that call for the Company to pay fixed interest rates ranging from 1.67% to 2.59% on aggregate amortized notional values of $94.5 million and receive a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on these notional values. In addition, one of the Company’s Offshore Marine Services 50% or less owned companies has entered into an interest rate swap agreement maturing in 2014 that calls for the joint venture to pay a fixed interest rate of 3.05% on the amortized notional value of $25.2 million and receive a variable interest rate based on LIBOR on the amortized notional value. The general purpose of these interest rate swap agreements is to provide protection against increases in interest rates, which might lead to higher interest costs for the Company or its joint venture.

The Company enters and settles positions in various exchange and non-exchange traded commodity swap, option and future contracts. In the Company’s commodity trading and logistics business, fixed price future purchase and sale contracts for ethanol and sugar are included in the Company’s non-exchange traded derivative positions. The Company enters into exchange traded positions to protect these purchase and sale contracts as well as its inventory balances from market changes. As of March 31, 2012, the net market exposure to ethanol and sugar under these contracts was not material. The Company also enters into exchange traded positions (primarily natural gas, heating oil, crude oil, gasoline, ethanol and sugar) to provide value to the Company should there be a sustained decline in the price of commodities that could lead to a reduction in the market values and cash flows of the Company’s Offshore Marine Services and Inland River Services businesses. As of March 31, 2012, these positions were not material.

The Company enters and settles various positions in U.S. Treasury notes and bonds through rate locks, futures or options on futures tied to U.S. Treasury notes. The general purpose of these transactions is to provide value to the Company should the price of U.S. Treasury notes and bonds decline, leading to generally higher interest rates, which might lead to higher interest costs for the Company. As of March 31, 2012, there were none of these types of positions outstanding.


4.
BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS

Superior Lift Boats Acquisition. On March 30, 2012, the Company acquired 18 lift boats, real property and working capital from Superior Energy Inc. (“Superior”) for $142.5 million. The Company performed a preliminary fair value analysis and the purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their fair values resulting in no goodwill being recorded. The preliminary fair value analysis is pending completion of a final valuation for the acquired assets and liabilities.

ICP Acquisition. On February 1, 2012, the Company obtained a 70% controlling interest in ICP through its acquisition of a portion of its partner's interest for $9.1 million in cash (see Note 6). ICP owns and operates an alcohol manufacturing facility dedicated to the production of alcohol for beverage, industrial and fuel applications. The Company performed a preliminary fair value analysis and the purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their fair values resulting in no goodwill being recorded. The preliminary fair value analysis is pending completion of a final valuation for the acquired assets and liabilities.

Lewis & Clark Acquisition. On December 31, 2011, the Company acquired certain assets and liabilities of Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc. and certain related affiliates (“Lewis & Clark”) for $29.6 million. The Company performed a preliminary fair value analysis and the purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their fair values resulting in $1.6 million in goodwill being recorded. The preliminary fair value analysis is pending completion of a final valuation for the acquired assets and liabilities.

10

Table of Contents

Windcat Acquisition. On December 22, 2011, the Company acquired 75% of the issued and outstanding shares in Windcat Workboats Holdings Ltd. (“Windcat”) for $21.5 million in cash. Windcat, based in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, is an operator of 29 wind farm utility vessels operating in the main offshore wind markets of Europe. The Company performed a preliminary fair value analysis and the purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their fair values resulting in no goodwill being recorded. The preliminary fair value analysis is pending completion of a final valuation for the acquired assets and liabilities.

Naviera Acquisition. On December 21, 2011, the Company acquired a 70% controlling interest in SEACOR Colombia Fluvial (MI) LLC for $1.9 million in cash. SEACOR Colombia Fluvial (MI) LLC's wholly-owned subsidiary, Naviera Central S.A. (“Naviera”), is a provider of inland river barge and terminal services in Colombia. The Company performed a preliminary fair value analysis and the purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their fair values resulting in $1.0 million in goodwill being recorded. The preliminary fair value analysis is pending completion of a final valuation for the acquired assets and liabilities.

Soylutions Acquisition. On July 29, 2011, the Company obtained a 100% controlling interest in Soylutions LLC (“Soylutions”) through its acquisition of its partner’s interest for $11.9 million in cash (see Note 6). The Company performed a fair value analysis and the purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and liabilities based on their fair values resulting in no goodwill being recorded. The fair value analysis was finalized during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Purchase Price Allocation. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price for the Company’s business acquisitions during the three months ended March 31, 2012 (in thousands):
Trade and other receivables
$
18,136

Other current assets
16,611

Investments, at Equity, and Advances to 50% or Less Owned Companies
(42,358
)
Property and Equipment
175,793

Intangible Assets
2,071

Accounts payable
(4,465
)
Other current liabilities
(3,300
)
Long-Term Debt
(946
)
Other Liabilities
(157
)
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
(13,246
)
Purchase price(1)
$
148,139

 ______________________
(1)
Purchase price is net of cash acquired of $3.5 million.


5.
EQUIPMENT ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSITIONS AND DEPRECIATION AND IMPAIRMENT POLICIES

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, capital expenditures were $119.6 million. Equipment deliveries during the period included one offshore support vessel, one wind farm utility vessel, three inland river dry cargo barges and seven helicopters.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company sold one offshore support vessel, one helicopter, one inland river towboat and other equipment for net proceeds of $5.8 million and gains of $4.5 million, all of which was recognized currently.

11

Table of Contents


From time to time, the Company enters into vessel sale-leaseback transactions with finance companies, provides seller financing on sales of its vessels to third parties and sells vessels, helicopters and barges to its 50% or less owned companies. A portion of the gains realized from these transactions may be deferred and recorded in deferred gains and other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Deferred gain activity related to these transactions for the three months ended March 31 was as follows (in thousands):
 
2012
 
2011
Balance at beginning of period
$
119,570

 
$
131,836

Amortization of deferred gains included in operating expenses as a reduction to rental expense
(4,925
)
 
(5,596
)
Amortization of deferred gains included in gains on asset dispositions and impairments, net
(1,064
)
 
(1,074
)
Balance at end of period
$
113,581

 
$
125,166


Equipment, stated at cost, is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset to an estimated salvage value. With respect to each class of asset, the estimated useful life is based upon a newly built asset being placed into service and represents the point at which it is typically not justifiable for the Company to continue to operate the asset in the same or similar manner. From time to time, the Company may acquire older assets that have already exceeded the Company’s useful life policy, in which case the Company depreciates such assets based on its best estimate of remaining useful life, typically the next survey or certification date.

As of March 31, 2012, the estimated useful life (in years) of each of the Company’s major categories of new equipment was as follows:
Offshore support vessels
20
Helicopters(1)
15
Inland river dry cargo and deck barges
20
Inland river liquid tank barges
25
Inland river towboats
25
U.S.-flag tankers
25
RORO vessels
20
Harbor and offshore tugs
25
Ocean liquid tank barges
25
______________________ 
(1)
Effective July 1, 2011, the Company changed its estimated useful life and salvage value for helicopters from 12 to 15 years and 30% to 40%, respectively, due to improvements in new aircraft models that continue to increase their long-term value and make them viable for operation over a longer period of time. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the change in estimate increased operating income by $3.9 million, net income by $2.6 million, and basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.12.

The Company performs an impairment analysis of long-lived assets used in operations, including intangible assets, when indicators of impairment are present. If the carrying value of the assets is not recoverable, as determined by the estimated undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value of the assets is reduced to fair value. Generally, fair value is determined using valuation techniques, such as expected discounted cash flows or appraisals, as appropriate. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, impairment charges recognized by the Company related to long-lived assets held for use were not material.


6.
INVESTMENTS, AT EQUITY, AND ADVANCES TO 50% OR LESS OWNED COMPANIES

Illinois Corn Processing. In January 2012, the Company and its partner each made a capital contribution of $0.5 million. On February 1, 2012, the Company obtained a 70% controlling interest in ICP through its acquisition of a portion of its partner’s interest for $9.1 million in cash (see Note 4). Upon the acquisition, the Company adjusted its investment in ICP to fair value resulting in the recognition of a gain of $6.0 million, net of tax, which is included in equity in earnings in 50% or less owned companies in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income. During the month ended January 31, 2012, the Company made net advances of $0.3 million under its revolving line of credit.

12

Table of Contents


Aeroleo. On March 1, 2012, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $5.9 million, net of tax, on its investment in and advances to Aeroleo. The impairment charge resulted from difficulties experienced by Aeroleo following one of its customer's cancellation of certain contracts for a number of AW139 aircraft under contract-lease from Aviation Services.

Hawker Pacific. The Company's Hawker Pacific joint venture is an aviation sales and support organization and a distributor of aviation components. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company advanced $3.3 million to Hawker Pacific. The advance bears interest at 10.0% per annum and matures on December 31, 2012, or earlier if a qualified refinancing occurs. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had an outstanding loan totaling $3.3 million inclusive of accrued interest.

Avion Pacific Limited. Avion Pacific Limited (“Avion”) is a joint venture that distributes aircraft and aircraft-related parts in Asia. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company made advances of $9.0 million to Avion and received repayments of $2.1 million. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had outstanding loans to Avion totaling $16.7 million inclusive of accrued interest.

SCFCo Holdings. SCFCo Holdings LLC (“SCFCo”) was established to operate towboats and dry cargo barges on the Parana-Paraguay Rivers and a terminal facility at Port Ibicuy, Argentina. At various times, SCFCo has agreed to expand its operations through additional capital contributions and bank financing. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company and its partner each contributed additional capital of $0.5 million.

Guarantees. The Company has guaranteed the payment of amounts owed by one of its joint ventures under a vessel charter agreement that expires in 2012. In addition, the Company has guaranteed amounts owed under banking facilities by certain of its joint ventures. As of March 31, 2012, the total amount guaranteed by the Company under these arrangements was $24.0 million. In addition, as of March 31, 2012, the Company had uncalled capital commitments to two of its joint ventures for a total of $2.6 million.


7.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

As of March 31, 2012, the Company’s unfunded capital commitments consisted primarily of offshore support vessels, helicopters, inland river tank barges, an interest in a dry-bulk articulated tug-barge, an interest in a river grain terminal and other property and equipment. These commitments totaled $343.0 million, of which $157.7 million is payable during the remainder of 2012 with the balance payable through 2016. Of the total unfunded capital commitments, $44.9 million may be terminated without further liability other than the payment of liquidated damages of $1.4 million.

On August 19, 2011, the Company granted two fixed price purchase options to an unrelated third party to acquire up to 25% of the outstanding common stock of O'Brien's Response Management Inc. ("O'Brien's"), the Company's Emergency and Crisis Services business segment. The first option to acquire a 12.5% interest may be exercised beginning August 19, 2012 through August 19, 2014. If the first option is exercised, the second option to acquire an additional 12.5% may be exercised beginning August 19, 2013 through August 19, 2015.

On June 12, 2009, a purported civil class action was filed against the Company, Era Group Inc., Era Helicopters LLC and three other defendants (collectively, the “Defendants”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, Superior Offshore International, Inc. v. Bristow Group Inc., et al., No. 09-CV-438 (D. Del.).  The Complaint alleges that the Defendants violated federal antitrust law by conspiring with each other to raise, fix, maintain or stabilize prices for offshore helicopter services in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico during the period January 2001 to December 2005.  The purported class of plaintiffs includes all direct purchasers of such services and the relief sought includes compensatory damages and treble damages.  The Company believes that the claims set forth in the Complaint are without merit and intends to vigorously defend the action.  On September 4, 2009, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint.  On September 14, 2010, the Court entered an order dismissing the Complaint.  On September 28, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration and amendment and a motion for re-argument (the “Motions”).  On November 30, 2010, the Court granted the Motions, amended the Court's September 14, 2010 Order to clarify that the dismissal was without prejudice, permitted the filing of an amended Complaint, and authorized limited discovery with respect to the new allegations in the amended Complaint.  Following the completion of such limited discovery, on February 11, 2011, the Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the amended Complaint with prejudice.  On June 23, 2011, the Court granted summary judgment for the Defendants.  On July 22, 2011, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.  On August 9, 2011, Defendants moved for certain excessive costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. That motion is fully briefed and a decision is pending. On October 11, 2011, the plaintiffs filed their opening appeal brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. That motion was fully briefed and oral argument completed on March 20, 2012. The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these claims but

13

Table of Contents

believes they are without merit and will continue to vigorously defend the action.

On July 14, 2010, a group of individuals and entities purporting to represent a class commenced a civil action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Terry G. Robin, et al. v. Seacor Marine, L.L.C., et al., No. 2:10-cv-01986 (E.D. La.) (the “Robin Case”), in which they assert that support vessels, including vessels owned by the Company, responding to the explosion and resulting fire that occurred aboard the semi-submersible drilling rig, the Deepwater Horizon, were negligent in their efforts to save lives and put out the fire and contributed to the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon and subsequent oil spill. The action now is part of the overall multi-district litigation, In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon”, MDL No. 2179 (“MDL”). The complaint seeks compensatory, punitive, exemplary, and other damages.  In response to this lawsuit, the Company filed petitions seeking exoneration from, or limitation of liability in relation to, any actions that may have been taken by vessels owned by the Company to extinguish the fire.  Pursuant to the Limitation of Liability Act, those petitions imposed an automatic stay on the Robin Case, and the court set a deadline of April 20, 2011 for individual claimants to assert claims in the limitation cases.  Approximately 66 claims were submitted by the deadline in all of the limitation actions.  On June 8, 2011, the Company moved to dismiss these claims (with the exception of one claim filed by a Company employee) on various legal grounds.  On October 12, 2011, the Court granted the Company's motion to dismiss in its entirety, dismissing with prejudice all claims that had been filed against the Company in the limitation actions (with the exception of one claim filed by a Company employee that was not subject to the motion to dismiss).  The Court entered final judgments in favor of the Company in the Robin Case and each of the limitation actions on November 21, 2011.  On December 12, 2011, the claimants appealed each of those judgments to the Unites States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.  The claimants' opening brief was filed on March 26, 2012, and the Company's response brief is due on May 7, 2012.  The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from this matter but believes it is without merit and will continue to vigorously defend the action.

On July 20, 2010, two individuals purporting to represent a class commenced a civil action in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans in the State of Louisiana, John Wunstell, Jr. and Kelly Blanchard v. BP, et al., No. 2010-7437 (Division K) (the “Wunstell Action”), in which they assert, among other theories, that Mr. Wunstell suffered injuries as a result of his exposure to certain noxious fumes and chemicals in connection with the provision of remediation, containment and response services by O'Brien's. The action now is part of the overall MDL. The complaint also seeks to establish a “class-wide court-supervised medical monitoring program” for all individuals “participating in BP's Deepwater Horizon Vessels of Opportunity Program and/or Horizon Response Program” who allegedly experienced injuries similar to those of Mr. Wunstell. The Company believes this lawsuit has no merit and will seek its dismissal.  Pursuant to contractual agreements with the responsible party, the responsible party has agreed, subject to certain potential limitations, to indemnify and defend O'Brien's in connection with the Wunstell Action and claims asserted in the MDL.

On December 15, 2010, O'Brien's and then-SEACOR subsidiary National Response Corporation (“NRC”) were named as defendants in one of the several consolidated “master complaints” that have been filed in the overall MDL.  The master complaint naming O'Brien's and NRC asserts various claims on behalf of a putative class against multiple defendants concerning the clean-up activities generally, and the use of dispersants specifically.  By court order, the Wunstell Action has been stayed as a result of the filing of the referenced master complaint.  The Company believes that the claims asserted against O'Brien's and NRC in the master complaint have no merit and on February 28, 2011, O'Brien's and NRC moved to dismiss all claims against them in the master complaint on legal grounds.  On September 30, 2011, the Court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss that O'Brien's and NRC had filed (an amended decision was issued on October 4, 2011 that corrected several grammatical errors and non-substantive oversights in the original order).  Although the Court refused to dismiss the referenced master complaint in its entirety at that time, the Court did recognize the validity of the “derivative immunity” and “implied preemption” arguments that O'Brien's and NRC advanced and has directed O'Brien's and NRC to (i) conduct limited discovery to develop evidence to support those arguments and (ii) then re-assert the arguments.  A schedule for such limited discovery and future motion practice has been established by the Court and currently contemplates that O'Brien's and NRC will file motions re-asserting their derivative immunity and implied preemption arguments on May 18, 2012.  The Court did, however, dismiss all state-law claims and certain other claims that had been asserted in the referenced master complaint, and dismissed the claims of all plaintiffs that have failed to allege a legally-sufficient injury.  In addition to the indemnity provided to O'Brien's, pursuant to contractual agreements with the responsible party, the responsible party has agreed, subject to certain potential limitations, to indemnify and defend O'Brien's and NRC in connection with these claims in the MDL. 

Subsequent to the filing of the referenced master complaint, four additional individual civil actions have been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana concerning the clean-up activities generally, which name the Company, O'Brien's and/or NRC as defendants and are part of the overall MDL. On April 8, 2011, O'Brien's was named as a defendant in Johnson Bros. Corporation of Louisiana v. BP, PLC, et al., No. 2:11-cv-00781 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by an individual business seeking damages allegedly caused by a delay on a construction project alleged to have resulted from the clean-up operations. On April 15, 2011, O'Brien's and NRC were named as defendants in James and Krista Pearson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et al., No. 2:11-cv-00863 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by a husband and wife, who allegedly participated in the clean-up effort and

14

Table of Contents

are seeking damages for personal injury, property damage to their boat, and amounts allegedly due under contract. On April 15, 2011, O'Brien's and NRC were named as defendants in Thomas Edward Black v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et al., No. 2:11-cv-00867 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by an individual who is seeking damages for lost income because he allegedly could not find work in the fishing industry after the oil spill. On April 20, 2011, a complaint was filed in Darnell Alexander, et al. v. BP, PLC, et al., No. 2:11-cv-00951 (E.D. La.) on behalf of 117 individual plaintiffs that seek to adopt the allegations made in the referenced master complaint against O'Brien's and NRC (and the other defendants). By court order, all four of these additional individual cases have been stayed as a result of the filing of the referenced master complaint.  The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from this matter but believes it is without merit and does not expect this matter will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

On February 18, 2011, Triton Asset Leasing GmbH, Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc., and Transocean Deepwater Inc. (collectively “Transocean”) named O'Brien's and NRC as third-party defendants in a Rule 14(c) Third-Party Complaint in Transocean's own Limitation of Liability Act action, which is part of the overall MDL, tendering to O'Brien's and NRC the claims in the referenced master complaint that have already been asserted against O'Brien's and NRC. Transocean, Cameron International Corporation, Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., M-I L.L.C., Weatherford U.S., L.P., and Weatherford International, Inc. have also filed cross-claims against O'Brien's and NRC for contribution and tort indemnity should they be found liable for any damages in Transocean's Limitation of Liability Act action and O'Brien's and NRC have asserted counterclaims against those same parties for identical relief.  As provided above, the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these actions but believes they are without merit and does not expect this matter will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

Separately, on March 2, 2012, the Court announced that BP Exploration & Production Inc. and BP America Production Company (collectively "BP") and the plaintiffs had reached an agreement on the terms of two proposed class action settlements that will resolve, among other things, plaintiffs' economic loss claims and clean-up related claims against BP.  The parties filed their proposed settlement agreements on April 18, 2012 along with motions seeking preliminary approval of the settlements, and the Court held a hearing on April 25, 2012 to consider those motions but has yet to make a ruling.   Although neither the Company, O'Brien's or NRC are parties to the settlement agreements, the Company, O'Brien's and NRC are listed on the releases accompanying both settlement agreements, such that if the settlement agreements are approved by the Court as currently drafted, any plaintiffs that settle will be required to release their claims against the Company, O'Brien's and NRC.

In the course of the Company's business, it may agree to indemnify a party.  If the indemnified party makes a successful claim for indemnification, the Company would be required to reimburse that party in accordance with the terms of the indemnification agreement.  Indemnification agreements generally are subject to threshold amounts, specified claim periods and other restrictions and limitations. 

In connection with the disposition of certain entities of the Company's Environmental Services Business Segment (the “NRC Entities”) on March 16, 2012, the Company remains contingently liable for certain obligations of the NRC Entities, including potential liabilities relating to work performed in connection with the Oil Spill Response.  These potential liabilities may not exceed the purchase consideration received by the Company for the NRC Entities and the Company currently is indemnified under contractual agreements with BP.

In the normal course of its business, the Company becomes involved in various other litigation matters including, among other things, claims by third parties for alleged property damages and personal injuries. Management has used estimates in determining the Company's potential exposure to these matters and has recorded reserves in its financial statements related thereto where appropriate. It is possible that a change in the Company's estimates of that exposure could occur, but the Company does not expect such changes in estimated costs would have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

In 2011, the Company received a Notice of Infringement (the “Notice”) from the Brazilian Federal Revenue Office. The Notice alleged the Company had imported a number of vessels into Brazil without properly completing the required importation documents and levied an assessment of $25.7 million. The Company intends to vigorously defend its position that the proposed assessment is erroneous and believes the resolution of this matter will not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations. Of the levied assessment, $19.3 million relates to managed vessels whose owner would be responsible to reimburse any potential payment.


8.
MULTI-EMPLOYER PENSION PLANS

There has been no material change in the multi-employer pension plans in which the Company participates, except that the Company received notification from the American Maritime Officers Pension Plan (the "AMOPP”) that, based on an actuarial valuation performed as of September 30, 2011, if the Company chose to withdraw from the AMOPP, its withdrawal liability would have been $39.3 million. That liability may change in future years based on various factors, primarily employee census. As of March 31, 2012, the Company has no intention to withdraw from the AMOPP and no deficit amounts have been invoiced. Depending upon the results of the future actuarial valuations and the ten-year rehabilitation plan, it is possible that the AMOPP will experience further funding deficits, requiring the Company to recognize additional payroll related operating expenses in the periods invoices are received or contribution levels are increased.

9.
LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS

As of March 31, 2012, the Company had $125.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the SEACOR revolving credit facility. The remaining availability under this facility was $279.0 million, net of issued letters of credit of $1.0 million. As of March 31, 2012, Era Group Inc. ("Era") had $290.0 million of outstanding borrowings under its senior secured revolving credit facilities. The remaining availability under this facility was $59.7 million, net of issued letters of credit of $0.3 million. In addition, as of March 31, 2012, the Company had other outstanding letters of credit totaling $56.7 million with various expiration dates through 2014.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company made scheduled payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $2.1 million, repaid $3.2 million of acquired debt, made repayments of $50.0 million of borrowings under the SEACOR revolving credit facility, made net repayments on inventory financing arrangements of $17.3 million and borrowed $38.0 million under the Era senior secured revolving credit facility.

SEACOR’s Board of Directors has previously authorized the Company to purchase any or all of its 5.875% Senior Notes due 2012 and its 7.375% Senior Notes due 2019, which may be acquired through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, depending on market conditions. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company purchased $5.5 million, in principal amount, of its 5.875% Senior Notes for $5.7 million, resulting in a loss on debt extinguishment of $0.2 million.


10.
STOCK REPURCHASES

SEACOR’s Board of Directors previously approved a securities repurchase plan that authorizes the Company to acquire shares of SEACOR common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), which may be acquired through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, depending on market conditions. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company did not acquire any Common Stock for treasury. As of March 31, 2012, the remaining authority under the repurchase plan was $150.0 million.


11.
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE OF SEACOR

Basic earnings per common share of SEACOR are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding during the relevant periods. Diluted earnings per common share of SEACOR are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding plus the effect of potentially dilutive securities through the application of the treasury stock method. Dilutive securities for this purpose assumes restricted stock grants have vested and common shares have been issued pursuant to the exercise of outstanding stock options. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, diluted earnings per common share of SEACOR excluded 501,274 of certain share awards as the effect of their inclusion in the computation would have been antidilutive. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, diluted earnings per common share of SEACOR excluded 182,839 of certain share awards as the effect of their inclusion in the computation would have been antidilutive.

15

Table of Contents


A reconciliation of basic and diluted weighted average outstanding common shares of SEACOR for the three months ended March 31 was as follows:
 
2012
 
2011
Basic Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
20,519,660

 
21,104,739

Effect of Dilutive Share Awards:
 
 
 
Options and Restricted Stock
373,550

 
334,685

Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
20,893,210

 
21,439,424




12.
SHARE BASED COMPENSATION

Transactions in connection with the Company’s share based compensation plans during the three months ended March 31, 2012 were as follows:
Director stock awards granted
1,000

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) shares issued
22,641

Restricted stock awards granted
109,100

Restricted stock awards canceled

Shares released from Deferred Compensation Plan

Restricted Stock Unit Activities:
 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2011
1,130

Granted

Converted to shares and issued to Deferred Compensation Plan
(370
)
Outstanding as of March 31, 2012
760

Stock Option Activities:
 
Outstanding as of December 31, 2011
1,272,192

Granted
37,400

Exercised
(48,497
)
Forfeited

Expired
(750
)
Outstanding as of March 31, 2012
1,260,345

Shares available for future grants and ESPP purchases as of March 31, 2012
368,896



13.
SEGMENT INFORMATION

Accounting standards require public business enterprises to report information about each of their operating business segments that exceed certain quantitative thresholds or meet certain other reporting requirements. An operating business segment has been defined as a component of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Certain reclassifications of prior year information have been made to conform to the current year's reportable segment presentation as a result of the Company's presentation of discontinued operations (see Note 1). The Company’s basis of measurement of segment profit or loss is as previously described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

16

Table of Contents

The following tables summarize the operating results, capital expenditures and assets of the Company’s reportable segments.
 
Offshore
Marine
Services
$’000
 
Aviation
Services
$’000
 
Inland
River
Services
$’000
 
Marine
Transportation
Services
$’000
 
Emergency and Crisis
Services
$’000
 
Commodity
Trading and
Logistics
$’000
 
Other
$’000
 
Corporate
and
Eliminations
$’000
 
Total
$’000
For the three months ended March 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
External customers
120,938

 
61,052

 
49,896

 
26,196

 
10,163

 
209,696

 
19,944

 

 
497,885

Intersegment
148

 

 
3,594

 
87

 
52

 

 

 
(3,881
)
 

 
121,086

 
61,052

 
53,490

 
26,283

 
10,215

 
209,696

 
19,944

 
(3,881
)
 
497,885

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
75,340

 
39,676

 
35,183

 
15,758

 
6,873

 
203,233

 
11,814

 
(3,765
)
 
384,112

Administrative and general
11,856

 
9,677

 
3,982

 
2,475

 
3,254

 
3,141

 
2,817

 
8,976

 
46,178

Depreciation and amortization
12,882

 
9,630

 
7,007

 
5,651

 
484

 
1,060

 
2,158

 
455

 
39,327

 
100,078

 
58,983

 
46,172

 
23,884

 
10,611

 
207,434

 
16,789

 
5,666

 
469,617

Gains on Asset Dispositions
1,845

 
1,765

 
1,927

 

 
5

 

 

 

 
5,542

Operating Income (Loss)
22,853

 
3,834

 
9,245

 
2,399

 
(391
)
 
2,262

 
3,155

 
(9,547
)
 
33,810

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative losses, net

 
(124
)
 

 

 

 
(2,939
)
 

 
(1,056
)
 
(4,119
)
Foreign currency gains (losses), net
1,123

 
917

 
(22
)
 
9

 
14

 
79

 
(16
)
 
448

 
2,552

Other, net

 
30

 

 
30

 

 

 

 
(114
)
 
(54
)
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
1,829

 
(6,419
)
 
250

 
(217
)
 
67

 
6,154

 
(422
)
 

 
1,242

Segment Profit (Loss)
25,805

 
(1,762
)
 
9,473

 
2,221

 
(310
)
 
5,556

 
2,717

 
 
 
 
Other Income (Expense) not included in Segment Profit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(5,850
)
Less Equity Earnings included in Segment Profit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,242
)
Income Before Taxes, Equity Earnings and Disc. Ops.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
26,339

Capital Expenditures
42,778

 
54,272

 
4,884

 
2,541

 
412

 

 
13,696

 
1,021

 
119,604

As of March 31, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property and Equipment
826,153

 
752,602

 
375,968

 
223,137

 
1,523

 
42,821

 
166,423

 
20,770

 
2,409,397

Investments, at Equity, and Advances to 50% or Less Owned Companies
68,645

 
40,841

 
50,758

 
11,989

 
268

 

 
48,271

 

 
220,772

Inventories (1)
6,261

 
25,876

 
2,681

 

 
642

 
57,393

 
1,476

 

 
94,329

Goodwill
13,367

 
352

 
4,345

 
550

 
37,138

 

 
1,302

 

 
57,054

Intangible Assets
5,500

 

 
8,755

 
1,423

 
5,909

 
157

 
388

 

 
22,132

Other current and long-term assets, excluding cash and near cash assets(2)
140,019

 
77,356

 
61,675

 
4,444

 
19,904

 
71,617

 
68,434

 
19,354

 
462,803

Segment Assets
1,059,945

 
897,027

 
504,182

 
241,543

 
65,384

 
171,988

 
286,294

 
 
 
 
Cash and near cash assets(2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
636,447

Discontinued operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4,019

Total Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3,906,953

______________________
(1)
Inventories for Commodity Trading and Logistics includes raw materials of $2.8 million and work in process of $2.4 million resulting from the acquisition of ICP. (see Note 4).
(2)
Cash and near cash assets includes cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, marketable securities, construction reserve funds and Title XI reserve funds.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

17

Table of Contents

 
Offshore
Marine
Services
$’000
 
Aviation
Services
$’000
 
Inland
River
Services
$’000
 
Marine
Transportation
Services
$’000
 
Emergency and Crisis Services
$’000
 
Commodity
Trading
and Logistics
$’000
 
Other
$’000
 
Corporate
and
Eliminations
$’000
 
Total
$’000
For the three months ended March 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
External customers
80,323

 
56,155

 
43,928

 
17,224

 
28,833

 
194,012

 
17,536

 

 
438,011

Intersegment
21

 

 
2,541

 
88

 

 

 

 
(2,650
)
 

 
80,344

 
56,155

 
46,469

 
17,312

 
28,833

 
194,012

 
17,536

 
(2,650
)
 
438,011

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
63,020

 
33,465

 
27,884

 
8,979

 
14,776

 
187,018

 
9,142

 
(2,541
)
 
341,743

Administrative and general
11,770

 
7,020

 
2,697

 
1,417

 
2,811

 
2,660

 
2,620

 
10,659

 
41,654

Depreciation and amortization
12,533

 
11,919

 
5,622

 
4,978

 
502

 
13

 
2,289

 
474

 
38,330

 
87,323

 
52,404

 
36,203

 
15,374

 
18,089

 
189,691

 
14,051

 
8,592

 
421,727

Gains on Asset Dispositions and Impairments, Net
4,364

 
2,194

 
697

 

 

 

 

 

 
7,255

Operating Income (Loss)
(2,615
)
 
5,945

 
10,963

 
1,938

 
10,744

 
4,321

 
3,485

 
(11,242
)
 
23,539

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative gains (losses), net

 
310

 

 

 

 
(4,750
)
 

 
1,122

 
(3,318
)
Foreign currency gains (losses), net
725

 
353

 

 
16

 
(51
)
 
(5
)
 
1

 
4,020

 
5,059

Other, net

 

 
1

 

 

 

 
(1
)
 
(178
)
 
(178
)
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
735

 
(99
)
 
(256
)
 

 

 
51

 
(389
)
 

 
42

Segment Profit (Loss)
(1,155
)
 
6,509

 
10,708

 
1,954

 
10,693

 
(383
)
 
3,096

 
 
 
 
Other Income (Expense) not included in Segment Profit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(4,822
)
Less Equity Earnings included in Segment Profit
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(42
)
Income Before Taxes, Equity Earnings and Disc. Ops
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
20,280

Capital Expenditures
18,093

 
9,209

 
31,521

 
4,199

 
16

 

 
229

 
71

 
63,338

As of March 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
Property and Equipment
617,170

 
603,904

 
343,618

 
217,938

 
900

 
143

 
150,983

 
18,704

 
1,953,360

Investments, at Equity, and Advances to 50% or Less Owned Companies
45,865

 
32,669

 
40,472

 

 

 
14,546

 
54,773

 

 
188,325

Inventories
4,523

 
24,408

 
2,702

 
365

 
380

 
58,607

 
1,539

 

 
92,524

Goodwill
13,367

 
353

 
1,743

 

 
37,086

 

 
1,302

 

 
53,851

Intangible Assets
7,502

 

 
1,001

 
1,834

 
7,733

 

 
502

 

 
18,572

Other current and long-term assets, excluding cash and near cash assets(1)
109,330

 
54,585

 
41,359

 
2,418

 
39,738

 
38,477

 
43,392

 
38,886

 
368,185

Segment Assets
797,757

 
715,919

 
430,895

 
222,555

 
85,837

 
111,773

 
252,491

 
 
 
 
Cash and near cash assets(1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
906,078

Discontinued operations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
153,803

Total Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3,734,698

 ______________________
(1)
Cash and near cash assets includes cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, marketable securities, construction reserve funds and Title XI reserve funds.

18

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements concerning management’s expectations, strategic objectives, business prospects, anticipated economic performance and financial condition and other similar matters involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements discussed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other important factors include, among others: decreased demand and loss of revenues as a result of U.S. government implemented moratoriums directing operators to cease certain drilling activities and any extension of such moratoriums (the “Moratoriums”), weakening demand for the Company’s services as a result of unplanned customer suspensions, cancellations, rate reductions or non-renewals of vessel charters and aviation equipment or failures to finalize commitments to charter vessels and aviation equipment in response to Moratoriums, increased government legislation and regulation of the Company’s businesses which could increase cost of operations, increased competition if the Jones Act is repealed, liability, legal fees and costs in connection with providing spill and emergency response services, including the Company’s involvement in response to the oil spill that resulted from the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon in April 2010, decreased demand for the Company’s services as a result of declines in the global economy, declines in valuations in the global financial markets and illiquidity in the credit sectors, including, interest rate fluctuations, availability of credit, inflation rates, change in laws, trade barriers, commodity prices and currency exchange fluctuations, the cyclical nature of the oil and gas industry, activity in foreign countries and changes in foreign political, military and economic conditions, changes in foreign and domestic oil and gas exploration and production activity, safety record requirements related to Offshore Marine Services, Marine Transportation Services and Aviation Services, decreased demand for Marine Transportation Services and Harbor and Offshore Towing Services due to construction of additional refined petroleum products, natural gas or crude oil pipelines or due to decreased demand for refined petroleum products, crude oil or chemical products or a change in existing methods of delivery, compliance with U.S. and foreign government laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations, the dependence of Offshore Marine Services, Marine Transportation Services and Aviation Services on several customers, consolidation of the Company’s customer base, safety issues experienced by a particular helicopter model that could result in customers refusing to use that helicopter model or a regulatory body grounding that helicopter model, which could also permanently devalue that helicopter model, the ongoing need to replace aging vessels and aircraft, industry fleet capacity, restrictions imposed by the Shipping Acts and Aviation Acts on the amount of foreign ownership of the Company’s Common Stock, operational risks of Offshore Marine Services, Marine Transportation Services, Harbor and Offshore Towing Services and Aviation Services, effects of adverse weather conditions and seasonality, dependence of spill response revenue on the number and size of spills and upon continuing government regulation in this area and Emergency and Crisis Services’ ability to comply with such regulation and other governmental regulation, liability in connection with providing spill response services, the level of grain export volume, the effect of fuel prices on barge towing costs, variability in freight rates for inland river barges, the effect of international economic and political factors in Inland River Services’ operations, adequacy of insurance coverage, the attraction and retention of qualified personnel by the Company and various other matters and factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. In addition, these statements constitute the Company’s cautionary statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. It is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, the following should not be considered a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties. The words “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “believe,” “plan” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of the document in which they are made. The Company disclaims any obligation or undertaking to provide any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect any change in the Company’s expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which the forward-looking statement is based. The forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect the Company’s businesses, particularly those mentioned under “Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7 on the Company’s Form 10-K and SEACOR’s periodic reporting on Form 8-K (if any), which are incorporated by reference.

Overview

The Company’s operations are divided into six main business segments – Offshore Marine Services, Aviation Services, Inland River Services, Marine Transportation Services, Emergency and Crisis Services and Commodity Trading and Logistics. The Company also has activities that are referred to and described under Other that primarily includes Harbor and Offshore Towing Services, various other investments in joint ventures and lending and leasing activities.

On March 16, 2012, the Company sold certain companies and assets of its Environmental Services business segment for a net sales price of $99.9 million and recognized a gain of $20.7 million, net of tax, or $0.99 per diluted share.  The Company has no continuing involvement in the business sold, although the sales agreement provides that the Company may receive contingent consideration equal to a portion of the revenue generated by any extraordinary oil spill response that occurs within three years following the date of sale.  As a result, the Company has reported, for all periods presented, the financial

19

Table of Contents

position, results of operations and cash flows for the sold business as discontinued operations.  The remaining business in its Environmental Services business segment was renamed Emergency and Crisis Services.

Emergency and Crisis Services is primarily engaged in providing emergency preparedness and crisis management services to the public and private sectors in the United States and abroad. Clients served include aerospace, chemicals, energy, food, health care, industrial, mining, oil, retail, shipping and transportation as well as industry associations, non-profit associations, school districts and universities.


Consolidated Results of Operations

The sections below provide an analysis of the Company’s operations by business segment for the three months ended March 31, 2012 (“Current Year Quarter”), as compared with the three months ended March 31, 2011 (“Prior Year Quarter”). See “Item 1. Financial Statements—Note 13. Segment Information” included in Part I for consolidating segment tables for each period presented.

Offshore Marine Services
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States, primarily U.S. Gulf of Mexico
47,313

 
39
 
19,161

 
24

Africa, primarily West Africa
17,087

 
14
 
19,467

 
24

Middle East
12,018

 
10
 
11,758

 
15

Brazil, Mexico, Central and South America
18,287

 
15
 
11,910

 
15

Europe, primarily North Sea
24,066

 
20
 
16,746

 
21

Asia
2,315

 
2
 
1,302

 
1

 
121,086

 
100
 
80,344

 
100

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Personnel
37,092

 
30
 
32,451

 
40

Repairs and maintenance
10,816

 
9
 
8,505

 
11

Drydocking
5,329

 
4
 
4,664

 
6

Insurance and loss reserves
3,637

 
3
 
2,766

 
3

Fuel, lubes and supplies
6,866

 
6
 
5,411

 
7

Leased-in equipment
5,738

 
5
 
3,457

 
4

Brokered vessel activity
285

 
 
2,470

 
3

Other
5,577

 
5
 
3,296

 
4

 
75,340

 
62
 
63,020

 
78

Administrative and general
11,856

 
10
 
11,770

 
15

Depreciation and amortization
12,882

 
10
 
12,533

 
15

 
100,078

 
82
 
87,323

 
108

Gains on Asset Dispositions
1,845

 
1
 
4,364

 
5

Operating Income (Loss)
22,853

 
19
 
(2,615
)
 
(3
)
Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency gains, net
1,123

 
1
 
725

 
1

Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
1,829

 
1
 
735

 
1

Segment Profit (Loss)
25,805

 
21
 
(1,155
)
 
(1
)



20

Table of Contents


Operating Revenues by Type. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the amount of operating revenues earned by type.
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Time charter:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States, primarily U.S. Gulf of Mexico
44,653

 
37
 
17,379

 
22
Africa, primarily West Africa
16,593

 
14
 
16,313

 
20
Middle East
10,340

 
9
 
9,429

 
12
Brazil, Mexico, Central and South America
15,949

 
13
 
10,487

 
13
Europe, primarily North Sea
23,563

 
19
 
16,696

 
21
Asia
2,371

 
2
 
1,321

 
2
Total time charter
113,469

 
94
 
71,625

 
90
Bareboat charter
705

 
1
 
207

 
Brokered vessel activity
313

 
 
3,368

 
4
Other marine services
6,599

 
5
 
5,144

 
6
 
121,086

 
100
 
80,344

 
100



21

Table of Contents

Time Charter Operating Data. The table below sets forth the average rates per day worked, utilization and available days data for each group of Offshore Marine Services’ vessels operating under time charters for the periods indicated. The rate per day worked is the ratio of total time charter revenues to the aggregate number of days worked. Utilization is the ratio of aggregate number of days worked to total calendar days available for work. Available days represents the total calendar days during which owned and chartered-in vessels are operated by the Company.
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
Rates Per Day Worked:
 
 
 
Anchor handling towing supply
$
30,928

 
$
29,685

Crew
7,803

 
6,630

Mini-supply
7,409

 
7,677

Standby safety
9,230

 
8,870

Supply
16,662

 
13,224

Towing supply
9,301

 
10,388

Specialty
12,964

 
6,987

Overall Average Rates Per Day Worked (excluding wind farm utility)
13,174

 
10,123

Wind farm utility
2,431

 

Overall Average Rates Per Day Worked (including wind farm utility)
10,839

 
10,123

Utilization:
 
 
 
Anchor handling towing supply
77
%
 
34
%
Crew
79
%
 
66
%
Mini-supply
98
%
 
62
%
Standby safety
86
%
 
84
%
Supply
84
%
 
65
%
Towing supply
48
%
 
68
%
Specialty
62
%
 
72
%
Overall Fleet Utilization (excluding wind farm utility)
81
%
 
65
%
Wind farm utility
86
%
 
%
Overall Fleet Utilization (including wind farm utility)
82
%
 
65
%
Available Days:
 
 
 
Anchor handling towing supply
1,547

 
1,530

Crew
3,363

 
3,870

Mini-supply
637

 
779

Standby safety
2,275

 
2,250

Supply
1,705

 
1,548

Towing supply
364

 
540

Specialty
273

 
360

Overall Fleet Available Days (excluding wind farm utility)
10,164

 
10,877

Wind farm utility
2,647

 

Overall Fleet Available Days (including wind farm utility)
12,811

 
10,877


Current Year Quarter compared with Prior Year Quarter

Operating Revenues. Operating revenues increased by $40.7 million in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. Excluding the contribution of wind farm utility vessels, time charter revenues were $36.3 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. Overall fleet utilization was 81% compared with 65%. The number of days available for charter was 10,164 compared with 10,877, a 713 day or 7% reduction, primarily due to fleet dispositions which reduced time charter revenues by $3.0 million. Overall average day rates were $13,174 per day compared with $10,123 per day, an increase of $3,051 per day or 30%. Improved utilization increased time charter revenues by $12.9 million. Fleet additions,

22

Table of Contents

the impact of vessels mobilizing between geographic regions and other changes in fleet mix combined to increase time charter revenues by $7.9 million. In overall terms, higher average day rates increased time charter revenues by $18.8 million, while the impact of unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates decreased time charter revenues by $0.3 million. The Company's fleet of wind farm utility vessels, which was acquired in December 2011, contributed time charter revenues of $5.5 million during the Current Year Quarter with an average day rate of $2,431 per day and a utilization rate of 86%.

In the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, time charter revenues were $27.3 million higher primarily due to firmer market conditions. During the Current Year Quarter, improved utilization and higher average day rates increased time charter revenues by $10.1 million and $14.8 million, respectively. Net fleet additions and other changes in fleet mix combined to increase time charter revenues by $2.4 million. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had four vessels cold-stacked in this region compared with twelve as of March 31, 2011.

In Brazil, Mexico and Central and South America, time charter revenues were $5.5 million higher, of which $3.1 million was due to net fleet additions and vessels that mobilized into the region and $3.0 million was due to higher average day rates. Lower utilization decreased time charter revenues by $0.6 million.

In Europe, excluding the $5.5 million contribution of the wind farm utility vessels in the Current Year Quarter, time charter revenues were $1.3 million higher, of which $0.8 million was due to improved average day rates and $1.0 million was due to incremental time charter revenues from a vessel that mobilized into the region. A vessel disposition and unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates decreased time charter revenues by $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

Revenues from brokered vessel activity were $3.1 million lower primarily due to reduced activity in West Africa.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses were $12.3 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. Personnel costs were $4.6 million higher primarily due to net fleet additions, including the Company's wind farm utility vessels that were acquired in December 2011, the return to service of previously cold-stacked vessels and inflationary pressures on rates of pay. Repair and maintenance expenses were $2.3 million higher, primarily in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, as activity levels increased during the Current Year Quarter. Fuel, lubes and supplies expenses were $1.5 million higher primarily due to the wind farm utility vessel fleet. Leased-in equipment expense was $2.3 higher primarily due to the charter-in of several vessels into Brazil, Mexico and Central and South America. Brokered vessel activity was $2.2 million lower primarily due to reduced activity in West Africa. Other operating expenses were $2.3 million higher primarily due to net fleet additions and increased activity levels.

Gains on Asset Dispositions. During the Current Year Quarter, the Company sold one offshore support vessel and other equipment for net proceeds of $2.0 million and gains of $1.7 million. In addition, the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $0.1 million. During the Prior Year Quarter, the Company sold one offshore support vessel and other equipment for net proceeds of $9.6 million and gains of $4.2 million. In addition, the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $0.2 million.

Operating Income. Excluding the impact of gains on asset dispositions and the impact of brokered vessel activity, operating income as a percentage of operating revenues was 17% in the Current Year Quarter compared with -10% in the Prior Year Quarter. The improvement was primarily due to firmer market conditions in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico as noted above.

Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax. Equity in earnings of 50% or less owned companies, net of tax increased by $1.1 million in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter primarily due to the commencement of a long-term charter for a vessel in November 2011 and improved results in the Offshore Marine Services' Mexican joint venture. These increases were partially offset by lower results from Offshore Marine Services' liftboat and Angolan joint ventures.




23

Table of Contents

Fleet Count

The composition of Offshore Marine Services’ fleet as of March 31 was as follows: 
 
Owned
 
Joint
Ventured
 
Leased-in
 
Pooled or
Managed
 
Total
2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anchor handling towing supply
14

 
2

 
3

 

 
19

Crew
31

 
7

 
7

 
3

 
48

Mini-supply
5

 
2

 
2

 

 
9

Standby safety
25

 
1

 

 

 
26

Supply
11

 

 
9

 
8

 
28

Towing supply
2

 
1

 
2

 

 
5

Liftboats(1)
18

 
2

 

 

 
20

Specialty
3

 
3

 

 
3

 
9

Wind farm utility
29

 

 
1

 

 
30

 
138

 
18

 
24

 
14

 
194

2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Anchor handling towing supply
15

 
2

 
2

 

 
19

Crew
40

 
2

 
7

 
3

 
52

Mini-supply
6

 

 
3

 

 
9

Standby safety
25

 
1

 

 

 
26

Supply
10

 

 
7

 
9

 
26

Towing supply
4

 
1

 
2

 

 
7

Liftboats

 
2

 

 

 
2

Specialty
4

 
3

 

 
3

 
10

Wind farm utility

 

 

 

 

 
104

 
11

 
21

 
15

 
151

______________________
(1) 
On March 30, 2012, Offshore Marine Services acquired 18 liftboats, real property and working capital from Superior Energy Inc. for $142.5 million.

24

Table of Contents

Aviation Services
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
46,230

 
76

 
39,233

 
70

Foreign
14,822

 
24

 
16,922

 
30

 
61,052

 
100

 
56,155

 
100

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Personnel
15,707

 
26

 
14,626

 
26

Repairs and maintenance
10,298

 
17

 
9,731

 
17

Insurance and loss reserves
2,746

 
4

 
1,608

 
3

Fuel
4,619

 
7

 
4,183

 
7

Leased-in equipment
445

 
1

 
489

 
1

Other
5,861

 
10

 
2,828

 
5

 
39,676

 
65

 
33,465

 
59

Administrative and general
9,677

 
16

 
7,020

 
13

Depreciation and amortization
9,630

 
16

 
11,919

 
21

 
58,983

 
97

 
52,404

 
93

Gains on Asset Dispositions and Impairments, Net
1,765

 
3

 
2,194

 
4

Operating Income
3,834

 
6

 
5,945

 
11

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative gains (losses), net
(124
)
 

 
310

 

Foreign currency gains, net
917

 
2

 
353

 
1

Other, net
30

 

 

 

Equity in Losses of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
(6,419
)
 
(11
)
 
(99
)
 

Segment Profit
(1,762
)
 
(3
)
 
6,509

 
12


Operating Revenues by Service Line. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the amount of operating revenues earned by service line.
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Gulf of Mexico, primarily from oil and gas services
34,198

 
56

 
26,161

 
47

Alaska, primarily from oil and gas services
3,326

 
5

 
5,104

 
9

Contract-leasing
14,997

 
25

 
16,922

 
30

Air Medical Services
6,336

 
10

 
5,856

 
10

Flightseeing
2

 

 
3

 

FBO
2,291

 
4

 
2,214

 
4

Intersegment Eliminations
(98
)
 

 
(105
)
 

 
61,052

 
100

 
56,155

 
100



25

Table of Contents

Current Year Quarter compared with Prior Year Quarter

Operating Revenues. Operating revenues increased by $4.9 million in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. Operating revenues in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico were $8.0 million higher primarily due to newly delivered medium and heavy helicopters being placed on contract, an expansion of government services support and a general increase in charter activity. Operating revenues in Alaska were $1.8 million lower primarily due to the temporary suspension of a contract with a major oil and gas customer whose operations are expected to resume in October 2012. Operating revenues from contract-leasing activities were $1.9 million lower primarily due to the deferral of $2.8 million of contract-leasing revenues from Aviation Services’ Brazilian joint venture due to uncertainties regarding collectability. This reduction was partially offset by additional helicopters placed on contract-leases with existing customers. Operating revenues for air medical services were $0.5 million higher due to an additional hospital contract.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses were $6.2 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. Personnel costs were $1.1 million higher as additional personnel were added to support the increased activity discussed above. Repair and maintenance expenses were $0.6 million higher primarily due to $1.9 million from enrolling additional helicopters in power-by-hour maintenance programs, a $2.2 million increase from increased activity and timing of repairs, partially offset by $3.6 million of vendor credits recognized in the Current Year Quarter. Insurance and loss reserves were $1.1 million higher due to an increase in the overall fleet value and the recognition of a good experience credit from Aviation Services' hull and machinery underwriters in the Prior Year Quarter. Other operating expenses were $3.0 million higher primarily due to the receipt of $1.8 million in insurance proceeds related to hurricane damages sustained in 2005 in the Prior Year Quarter.

Administrative and General. Administrative and general expenses were $2.7 million higher primarily due to the recognition of previously deferred legal and other professional expenses.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $2.3 million lower due to a change in estimate of the useful life and salvage value of helicopters, which reduced depreciation expense by $3.9 million in the Current Year Quarter, partially offset by the addition of new and higher cost equipment. Effective July 1, 2011, the Company changed its estimated useful life and salvage value for helicopters from 12 to 15 years and 30% to 40%, respectively, due to improvements in new aircraft models that continue to increase their long-term value and make them viable for operation over a longer period of time.
 
Gains on Asset Dispositions and Impairments, Net. During the Current Year Quarter, Aviation Services sold one helicopter and other equipment for proceeds of $2.9 million and gains of $1.5 million. In addition, Aviation Services recognized previously deferred gains of $0.3 million. During the Prior Year Quarter, Aviation Services sold two helicopters and other equipment for proceeds of $2.8 million and gains of $2.0 million. In addition, Aviation Services recognized previously deferred gains of $0.2 million.

Operating Income. Operating income as a percentage of operating revenues was 6% in the Current Year Quarter compared with 11% in the Prior Year Quarter. The decrease was primarily due to higher personnel and insurance related costs and the recognition of previously deferred legal and other professional expenses as noted above, partially offset by the change in depreciation policy noted above.

Equity in Losses of 50% or Less Owned Companies. During the Current Year Quarter, Aviation Services recognized an impairment charge of $5.9 million, net of tax, on its Brazilian joint venture.


26

Table of Contents

Fleet Count

The composition of Aviation Services’ fleet as of March 31 was as follows: 
 
Owned(1)
 
Joint
Ventured
 
Leased-in(2)
 
Managed
 
Total
2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Light helicopters – single engine
52

 
6

 

 

 
58

Light helicopters – twin engine
30

 

 
6

 
10

 
46

Medium helicopters
61

 
1

 
1

 
3

 
66

Heavy helicopters
8

 

 

 

 
8

 
151

 
7

 
7

 
13

 
178

2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Light helicopters – single engine
52

 
6

 
3

 

 
61

Light helicopters – twin engine
29

 

 
6

 
9

 
44

Medium helicopters
58

 

 
2

 
3

 
63

Heavy helicopters
9

 

 

 

 
9

 
148

 
6

 
11

 
12

 
177

______________________
(1) 
Excludes one helicopter removed from service as of March 31, 2011.
(2) 
Excludes three helicopters removed from service as of March 31, 2011.


 

27

Table of Contents

Inland River Services
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
53,376

 
100

 
46,469

 
100

Foreign
114

 

 

 

 
53,490

 
100

 
46,469

 
100

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Barge logistics
19,737

 
37

 
17,754

 
38

Personnel
5,377

 
10

 
3,390

 
7

Repairs and maintenance
2,192

 
4

 
1,028

 
2

Insurance and loss reserves
705

 
1

 
658

 
2

Fuel, lubes and supplies
1,143

 
2

 
908

 
2

Leased-in equipment
3,362

 
6

 
2,788

 
6

Other
2,667

 
5

 
1,358

 
3

 
35,183

 
65

 
27,884

 
60

Administrative and general
3,982

 
8

 
2,697

 
6

Depreciation and amortization
7,007

 
13

 
5,622

 
12

 
46,172

 
86

 
36,203

 
78

Gains on Asset Dispositions
1,927

 
3

 
697

 
2

Operating Income
9,245

 
17

 
10,963

 
24

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency losses, net
(22
)
 

 

 

Other, net

 

 
1

 

Equity in Earnings (Losses) of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
250

 
1

 
(256
)
 
(1
)
Segment Profit
9,473

 
18

 
10,708

 
23


Operating Revenues by Service Line. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, operating revenues earned by service line.
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dry cargo barge pool participation
24,609

 
46
 
27,965

 
60
Liquid unit tow operations
6,855

 
13
 
6,677

 
14
Charter-out of dry cargo barges
2,201

 
4
 
2,034

 
5
10,000 barrel liquid tank barge operations
5,116

 
10
 
3,671

 
8
Inland river towboat operations and other activities
14,709

 
27
 
6,122

 
13
 
53,490

 
100
 
46,469

 
100

 

28

Table of Contents

Dry Cargo Barge Pool Operating Data. The following table presents, for the periods indicated, Inland River Services’ interest in tons moved and its available barge days in the dry cargo barge pools. Available barge days represents the total calendar days during which the Company’s owned and chartered-in barges were in the pool.
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
Tons
 
%
 
Tons
 
%
Tons Moved (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Grain
962

 
71
 
964

 
68
Non-Grain
388

 
29
 
462

 
32
 
1,350

 
100
 
1,426

 
100
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Days
 
 
 
Days
 
 
Available barge days
50,651

 
 
 
47,354

 
 

Current Year Quarter compared with Prior Year Quarter

Operating Revenues. Operating revenues increased by $7.0 million in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. Operating revenues from the dry cargo barge pools were $3.4 million lower as a result of a reduction in activity levels due to poor river conditions and weak demand for freight in the Current Year Quarter. As a result, a portion of the fleet was idled in the Current Year Quarter. Operating revenues from the 10,000 barrel liquid tank barge operations increased by $1.4 million primarily due to an increase in northbound activity. Operating revenues from inland river towboat operations and other activities increased by $8.6 million primarily due to activity in SCF's Lewis and Clark Fleeting and Terminal operations acquired in December 2011 ("Lewis & Clark").

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses were $7.3 million higher in the Current Year Quarter primarily due to Lewis & Clark. The increases were partially offset by a reduction of operating expenses for the dry cargo barge pools as a result of lower activity levels and idling a portion of the fleet as described above.

Administrative and General. Administrative and general expenses were $1.3 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter, primarily due to activity from Lewis & Clark, the acquisition of a 70% interest in Naviera in December 2011 and higher wage and benefit costs.
 
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $1.4 million higher in the Current Year Quarter primarily due to Lewis & Clark and the consolidation of Soylutions beginning in July 2011.

Operating Income. Excluding the impact of gains on assets dispositions, operating income as a percentage of operating revenues was 14% in the Current Year Quarter compared with 22% in the Prior Year Quarter. The decrease was primarily attributable to the idling a portion of the fleet noted above.

Gains on Asset Dispositions. During the Current Year Quarter, the Company financed the sale of one towboat and recognized gains of $1.2 million. In addition, the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $0.7 million. During the Prior Year Quarter, the Company recognized previously deferred gains of $0.7 million. 


29

Table of Contents

Fleet Count

The composition of Inland River Services’ fleet as of March 31 was as follows: 
 
Owned
 
Joint
Ventured
 
Leased-in
 
Pooled or
Managed
 
Total
2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Inland river dry cargo barges
692

 
172

 
2

 
613

 
1,479

Inland river liquid tank barges
69

 

 

 
8

 
77

Inland river deck barges
20

 

 

 

 
20

Inland river towboats
15

 
15

 

 

 
30

Dry cargo vessel(1)

 
1

 

 

 
1

 
796

 
188

 
2

 
621

 
1,607

2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Inland river dry cargo barges
689

 
172

 
2

 
634

 
1,497

Inland river liquid tank barges
70

 

 

 
10

 
80

Inland river deck barges
26

 

 

 

 
26

Inland river towboats
17

 
15

 

 

 
32

Dry cargo vessel(1)

 
1

 

 

 
1

 
802

 
188

 
2

 
644

 
1,636

 ______________________
(1)
Argentine-flag.

Marine Transportation Services
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
17,827

 
68

 
17,312

 
100
Foreign
8,456

 
32

 

 
 
26,283

 
100

 
17,312

 
100
Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Personnel
4,250

 
16

 
3,881

 
23
Repairs and maintenance
1,282

 
5

 
543

 
3
Drydocking
299

 
1

 
400

 
2
Insurance and loss reserves
605

 
2

 
490

 
3
Fuel, lubes and supplies
2,248

 
9

 
389

 
2
Leased-in equipment
3,117

 
12

 
2,900

 
17
Other
3,957

 
15

 
376

 
2
 
15,758

 
60

 
8,979

 
52
Administrative and general
2,475

 
9

 
1,417

 
8
Depreciation and amortization
5,651

 
22

 
4,978

 
29
 
23,884

 
91

 
15,374

 
89
Operating Income
2,399

 
9

 
1,938

 
11
Other Income (Expense):
 
 

 
 
 
 
Foreign currency gains, net
9

 

 
16

 
Other, net
30

 

 

 
Equity in Losses of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
(217
)
 
(1
)
 

 
Segment Profit
2,221

 
8

 
1,954

 
11

30

Table of Contents

 
Operating Revenues by Charter Arrangement. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the amount of operating revenues earned from charter arrangements.
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Time charter
9,166

 
35
 
8,621

 
50
Bareboat charter
8,649

 
33
 
8,554

 
49
Technical management services
182

 
1
 
137

 
1
G&G Shipping
8,286

 
31
 

 
 
26,283

 
100
 
17,312

 
100

Current Year Quarter compared with Prior Year Quarter

G&G Shipping Acquisition. In April 2011, Marine Transportation Services acquired real property, eight foreign flag Roll-on/Roll-off (“RORO”) vessels and a 70% interest in an operating company engaged in the shipping trade between the United States, the Bahamas and the Caribbean (the "G&G Shipping Acquisition"). The operating company leases-in the real property and the RORO vessels from the Company. In the Current Year Quarter, this operation contributed an operating loss of $0.8 million.

Operating Revenues.  Operating revenues increased by $9.0 million in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter primarily due to the G&G Shipping Acquisition as discussed above. Time charter revenues were $0.5 million higher in the Current Year Quarter primarily due to an increase in charter hire rates for three vessels and one additional operating day in the Current Year Quarter. Bareboat charter revenues were $0.1 million higher in the Current Year Quarter due to one additional operating day in the Current Year Quarter.

Operating Expenses.  Operating expenses increased by $6.8 million in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter primarily due to the G&G Shipping Acquisition.

Administrative and General. Administrative and general expenses were $1.1 million higher in the Current Year Quarter primarily due to the G&G Shipping Acquisition.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $0.7 million higher in the Current Year Quarter primarily due to the G&G Shipping Acquisition, partially offset by a reduction due to the sale of the Seabulk America in October 2011.

Operating Income. Operating income as a percentage of operating revenues was 9% in the Current Year Quarter compared with 11% in the Prior Year Quarter primarily due to the results of the G&G Shipping Acquisition.

Equity in Losses of 50% or Less Owned Companies. Equity in losses was $0.2 million in the Current Year Quarter primarily reflecting depreciation expense in the Company's joint venture established to own an articulated tug-barge, which began a charter in April 2012.

Fleet Count

As of March 31, 2012, Marine Transportation Services’ fleet included seven U.S.-flag product tankers operating in the domestic coastwise trade, of which five were owned and two were leased-in, and eight owned foreign flag RORO vessels operating in the shipping trade between the United States, the Bahamas and the Caribbean. Of the U.S-flag product tankers, four were operating under long-term bareboat charters and three were operating under time charters. As of March 31, 2011, Marine Transportation Services’ fleet included eight U.S.-flag product tankers operating in the domestic coastwise trade.
 

31

Table of Contents

Emergency and Crisis Services
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
8,896

 
87

 
27,582

 
96

Foreign
1,319

 
13

 
1,251

 
4

 
10,215

 
100

 
28,833

 
100

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subcontractors
4,522

 
44

 
13,006

 
45

Personnel
2,351

 
23

 
1,769

 
6

Other

 

 
1

 

 
6,873

 
67

 
14,776

 
51

Administrative and general
3,254

 
32

 
2,811

 
10

Depreciation and amortization
484

 
5

 
502

 
2

 
10,611

 
104

 
18,089

 
63

Gains on Asset Dispositions
5

 

 

 

Operating Income (Loss)
(391
)
 
(4
)
 
10,744

 
37

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency gains (losses), net
14

 

 
(51
)
 

Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
67

 
1

 

 

Segment Profit (Loss)
(310
)
 
(3
)
 
10,693

 
37

Operating Revenues by Service Line. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the amount of operating revenues earned by service line.
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Response Services
3,815

 
37
 
22,138

 
77
Retainer Services
2,785

 
27
 
2,562

 
9
Professional Services
3,456

 
34
 
3,410

 
11
Software Services
155

 
2
 
222

 
1
Equipment Sales and Leasing
4

 
 
501

 
2
 
10,215

 
100
 
28,833

 
100

Current Year Quarter compared with Prior Year Quarter
Operating Results. Operating revenues and operating margins for Emergency and Crisis Services can vary materially between comparable periods depending upon the number and magnitude of emergency responses. Emergency and Crisis Services' operating results in the Prior Year Quarter were impacted by oil spill response activities relating to the BP Macondo well incident in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico following the sinking of the semi-submersible drilling rig Deepwater Horizon in April 2010 (the “Oil Spill Response”). Emergency and Crisis Services provided professional assistance and software systems in support of incident management activities.


32

Table of Contents

Commodity Trading and Logistics
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States
182,260

 
87

 
165,095

 
85

Foreign
27,436

 
13

 
28,917

 
15

 
209,696

 
100

 
194,012

 
100

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating
203,233

 
97

 
187,018

 
96

Administrative and general
3,141

 
1

 
2,660

 
2

Depreciation
1,060

 
1

 
13

 

 
207,434

 
99

 
189,691

 
98

Gains on asset dispositions, net

 

 

 

Operating Income
2,262

 
1

 
4,321

 
2

Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative losses, net(1)
(2,939
)
 
(1
)
 
(4,750
)
 
(2
)
Foreign currency gains (losses), net
79

 

 
(5
)
 

Equity in Earnings of 50% or Less Owned Companies, Net of Tax
6,154

 
3

 
51

 

Segment Profit (Loss)
5,556

 
3

 
(383
)
 

______________________
(1)
In the Company’s energy and sugar trading businesses, fixed price future purchase and sale contracts for ethanol and sugar are included in derivative positions at fair value. The Company routinely enters into exchange traded derivative positions to offset its net commodity market exposure on these purchase and sale contracts as well as its inventory balances. As a result, derivative gains (losses), net recognized during any period are predominately offset by fair value adjustments included in operating revenues and expenses on completed transactions, subject to certain timing differences on the delivery of physical inventories. As of March 31, 2012 and 2011, the net market exposure to ethanol and sugar under its contracts and inventory balances was not material.

Operating Revenues and Segment Profit (Loss) by Commodity. The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the amount of operating revenues earned and segment profit (loss) by commodity.
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
%
 
$’000
 
%
Operating Revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Energy Trading
182,210

 
87

 
168,760

 
87
Sugar Trading
25,562

 
12

 
24,680

 
13
Rice Trading
2,023

 
1

 
572

 
Intersegment Eliminations
(99
)
 

 

 
 
209,696

 
100

 
194,012

 
100
Segment Profit (Loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Energy Trading
6,805

 
122

 
(43
)
 
11
Sugar Trading
(803
)
 
(14
)
 
(75
)
 
20
Rice Trading
(446
)
 
(8
)
 
(265
)
 
69
 
5,556

 
100

 
(383
)
 
100


Energy Trading. On February 1, 2012, the Company obtained a 70% controlling interest in ICP through its acquisition of a portion of its partner's interest for $9.1 million in cash. ICP owns and operates an alcohol manufacturing facility dedicated to the production of alcohol for beverage, industrial and fuel applications. Upon the acquisition, the Company adjusted its investment in ICP to fair value resulting in the recognition of a gain of $6.0 million, net of tax, which is included in equity in earnings in 50%

33

Table of Contents

or less owned companies. The operating results of ICP have been consolidated with operating results of energy trading beginning February 1, 2012.

Other Segment Profit
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
$’000
Harbor and Offshore Towing Services
3,282

 
3,488

Other Activities
(143
)
 
(3
)
Equity in Losses of 50% or Less Owned Companies
(422
)
 
(389
)
Segment Profit
2,717

 
3,096

 
Corporate and Eliminations
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
$’000
Corporate Expenses
(9,547
)
 
(11,242
)
Eliminations

 

Operating Loss
(9,547
)
 
(11,242
)
Other Income (Expense):
 
 
 
Derivative gains (losses), net
(1,056
)
 
1,122

Foreign currency gains, net
448

 
4,020

Other, net
(114
)
 
(178
)

Corporate Expenses. Corporate expenses decreased by $1.7 million in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter primarily due to lower audit and tax fees and management bonus accruals, partially offset by the receipt in the Prior Year Quarter of additional insurance proceeds related to hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

Derivative gains (losses), net. Derivative losses, net of $1.1 million in the Current Year Quarter were primarily due to losses on equity indices partially offset by gains on forward currency exchange, option and future contracts. Derivative gains, net of $1.1 million in the Prior Year Quarter were primarily due to gains on exchange traded commodity options and future contracts.

Foreign currency gains, net. Foreign currency gains, net of $0.4 million and $4.0 million in the Current Year Quarter and Prior Year Quarter, respectively, were primarily due to the strengthening of the euro against the U.S. dollar.

Other Income (Expense) not included in Segment Profit (Loss)
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
$’000
Interest income
2,976

 
3,732

Interest expense
(12,024
)
 
(10,040
)
Debt extinguishment losses, net
(160
)
 
(48
)
Marketable security gains, net
3,358

 
1,534

 
(5,850
)
 
(4,822
)

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by $2.0 million in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter primarily due to interest expense on borrowings from Era's $350.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility entered into on December 22, 2011.


34

Table of Contents


Marketable Security Gains, net. Marketable security gains, net in the Current Year Quarter and Prior Year Quarter were primarily attributable to gains on the Company's long marketable security positions partially offset by losses on its short marketable security positions.

Discontinued Operations

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax, was $19.4 million in the Current Year Quarter compared with a loss of $1.2 million in the Prior Year Quarter. On March 16, 2012, the Company sold certain companies and assets of its Environmental Services business segment for a net sales price of $99.9 million and recognized a gain of $20.7 million, net of tax, or $0.99 per diluted share. The Company has no continuing involvement in the business sold, although the sales agreement provides that the Company may receive contingent consideration equal to a portion of the revenue generated by any extraordinary oil spill response that occurs within three years following the date of sale.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

The Company's ongoing liquidity requirements arise primarily from working capital needs, and its obligations to meet capital commitments and repay debt obligations. The Company may use its liquidity to fund acquisitions, repurchase shares of SEACOR common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), for treasury or to make other investments. Sources of liquidity are cash balances, marketable securities, construction reserve funds, Title XI reserve funds, cash flows from operations and borrowings under the Company's revolving credit facilities. From time to time, the Company may secure additional liquidity through asset sales or the issuance of debt, shares of Common Stock or common stock of its subsidiaries, preferred stock or a combination thereof.

The Company’s unfunded capital commitments as of March 31, 2012, consisted primarily of offshore support vessels, helicopters, inland river tank barges, harbor tugs, an interest in a dry-bulk articulated tug-barge, an interest in a river grain terminal and other property and equipment. These commitments totaled $343.0 million, of which $157.7 million is payable during the remainder of 2012 with the balance payable through 2016. Of the total unfunded capital commitments, $44.9 million may be terminated without further liability other than the payment of liquidated damages of $1.4 million.

As of March 31, 2012, construction reserve funds of $250.3 million were classified as non-current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as the Company has the intent and ability to use the funds to acquire equipment.

SEACOR’s Board of Directors previously approved a securities repurchase plan that authorizes the Company to acquire Common Stock, which may be acquired through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, depending on market conditions. As of March 31, 2012, the remaining authority under the repurchase plan was $150.0 million.

SEACOR’s Board of Directors has previously authorized the Company to purchase any or all of its 5.875% Senior Notes due 2012 and its 7.375% Senior Notes due 2019, which may be acquired through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, depending on market conditions.

As of March 31, 2012, the Company had $125.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the SEACOR revolving credit facility. The remaining availability under this facility as of March 31, 2012 was $279.0 million, net of issued letters of credit of $1.0 million. On November 3, 2012, the maximum committed amount under the revolving credit facility will be reduced by $40.5 million. As of March 31, 2012, Era had $290.0 million of outstanding borrowings under its senior secured revolving credit facility. The remaining availability under this facility as of March 31, 2012 was $59.7 million, net of issued letters of credit of $0.3 million. In addition, the Company had other outstanding letters of credit totaling $56.7 million with various expiration dates through 2014.


35

Table of Contents

Summary of Cash Flows
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
$’000
Cash flows provided by or (used in):
 
 
 
Operating Activities - Continuing Operations
49,580

 
92,556

Operating Activities - Discontinued Operations
(11,815
)
 
13,471

Investing Activities - Continuing Operations
(273,388
)
 
(72,981
)
Investing Activities - Discontinued Operations
88,532

 
(1,758
)
Financing Activities - Continuing Operations
(35,332
)
 
5,637

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents
2,212

 
3,564

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
(180,211
)
 
40,489


Operating Activities

Cash flows provided by operating activities decreased by $68.3 million in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter. The components of cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities during the Current Year Quarter and Prior Year Quarter were as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2012
 
2011
 
$’000
 
$’000
Operating income from continuing operations before depreciation and gains on asset dispositions and impairments, net
67,595

 
54,614

Operating income from discontinued operations before depreciation and gains on asset dispositions and impairments, net
133

 
245

Changes in operating assets and liabilities before interest and income taxes
(29,748
)
 
44,996

Purchases of marketable securities
(10,498
)
 
(33,952
)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
14,658

 
46,940

Cash settlements on derivative transactions, net
(6,289
)
 
(4,398
)
Dividends received from 50% or less owned companies
422

 
1,110

Interest paid, excluding capitalized interest
(3,360
)
 
(1,206
)
Income taxes refunded (paid), net
1,053

 
(3,597
)
Other
3,799

 
1,275

Total cash flows provided by operating activities
37,765

 
106,027


Operating income from continuing operations before depreciation and gains on asset dispositions and impairments, net was $13.0 million higher in the Current Year Quarter compared with the Prior Year Quarter primarily due to improvements in Offshore Marine Services, partially offset by reduced oil spill response activities in Emergency and Crisis Services. See “Consolidated Results of Operations” included above for a discussion of the results of each of the Company's business segments.

During the Current Year Quarter, changes in operating assets and liabilities before interest and income taxes used cash flows of $29.7 million primarily due to increases in working capital employed by Offshore Marine Services, Aviation Services, Emergency and Crisis Services and Commodity Trading and Logistics. During the Prior Year Quarter, changes in operating assets and liabilities before interest and income taxes generated cash flows of $45.0 million primarily due to reduced working capital employed in Offshore Marine Services, Inland River Services, Emergency and Crisis Services and Discontinued Operations, partially offset by increased working capital in Commodity Trading and Logistics due to the accumulation of ethanol inventories.

36

Table of Contents


During the Current Year Quarter, cash used in operating activities included $9.0 million to purchase marketable security long positions and $1.5 million to cover marketable security short positions. During the Current Year Quarter, cash provided by operating activities included $12.2 million received from the sale of marketable security long positions and $2.5 million received upon entering into marketable security short positions.

During the Prior Year Quarter, cash used in operating activities included $10.3 million to purchase marketable security long positions and $23.7 million to cover marketable security short positions. During the Prior Year Quarter, cash provided by operating activities included $18.7 million received from the sale of marketable security long positions and $28.2 million received upon entering into marketable security short positions.

Investing Activities

During the Current Year Quarter, net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations was $273.4 million primarily as follows:

Capital expenditures were $119.6 million. Equipment deliveries included one offshore support vessel, one wind farm utility vessel, three inland river dry cargo barges and seven helicopters.

Proceeds from the disposition of property and equipment were $5.8 million. The Company sold one offshore support vessel, one helicopter, one inland river towboat and other equipment.

The Company made net investments in its 50% or less owned companies of $13.5 million.

The Company released restricted cash of $4.7 million.

The Company acquired 18 lift boats, real property and working capital from Superior for $142.5 million.

The Company obtained a 70% controlling interest in ICP through its acquisition of a portion of its partner's interest for $9.1 million in cash.

During the Current Year Quarter, net cash provided by investing activities of discontinued operations was $88.5 million primarily as follows:

The Company sold certain companies and assets that were part of its Environmental Services business segment for a net sales price of $99.9 million. Net cash proceeds received were $89.4 million.

During the Prior Year Quarter, net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations was $73.0 million primarily as follows:

Capital expenditures were $63.3 million. Equipment deliveries included three helicopters, 55 inland river dry cargo barges and two liquid tank barges. In addition, the Company acquired the remaining interest in an offshore support vessel previously joint ventured.

Proceeds from the disposition of property and equipment were $13.6 million. The Company sold one offshore support vessel, two helicopters and other equipment.

The Company made net investments in its 50% or less owned companies of $8.7 million.

Construction reserve fund account transactions included withdrawals of $0.2 million and deposits of $8.0 million.

Financing Activities

During the Current Year Quarter, net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations was $35.3 million. The Company:

borrowed $38.0 million under the Era senior secured revolving credit facility;

repaid $50.0 million under the SEACOR revolving credit facility;

37

Table of Contents


purchased $5.5 million, in principal amount, of its 5.875% Senior Notes due 2012 for an aggregate purchase price of $5.7 million;

made scheduled payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $2.1 million;

repaid $3.2 million of acquired debt;

had net borrowings on inventory financing arrangements of $17.3 million; and

received $5.3 million for share award plans.

During the Prior Year Quarter, net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations was $5.6 million. The Company:

purchased $1.0 million, in principal amount, of its 5.875% Senior Notes due 2012 for an aggregate purchase price of $1.1 million;

made scheduled payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $2.0 million;

had net borrowings on inventory financing arrangements of $3.5 million; and

received $4.6 million from share award plans.

Short and Long-Term Liquidity Requirements

Current economic conditions have continued to disrupt the credit and capital markets. To date, the Company’s liquidity has not been materially impacted by the current credit environment and management does not expect that it will be materially impacted in the near future. The Company anticipates it will continue to generate positive cash flows from operations and that these cash flows will be adequate to meet the Company’s working capital requirements. In support of the Company’s capital expenditure program or other liquidity requirements, the Company may: use its cash balances; sell securities; utilize construction reserve funds; sell assets; enter into sale and leaseback transactions for equipment; borrow under its revolving credit facilities; issue debt, shares of Common Stock, common stock of its subsidiaries or preferred stock; or a combination thereof.

The Company’s long-term liquidity is dependent upon its ability to generate operating profits sufficient to meet its requirements for working capital, capital expenditures and a reasonable return on shareholders’ investment. The Company believes that earning such operating profits will permit it to maintain its access to favorably priced debt, equity or off-balance sheet financing arrangements. Management will continue to closely monitor the Company’s liquidity and the credit and capital markets.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

For a discussion of the Company's off-balance sheet arrangements, refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. There has been no material change in the Company's off-balance sheet arrangements during the Current Year Quarter except for the indemnifications of the NRC Entities as discussed below in Contingencies.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

For a discussion of the Company's contractual obligations and commercial commitments, refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. There has been no material change in the Company's contractual obligations and commercial commitments during the Current Year Quarter.

Contingencies

On August 19, 2011, the Company granted two fixed price purchase options to an unrelated third party to acquire up to 25% of the outstanding common stock of O'Brien's, the Company's Emergency and Crisis Services business segment. The first option to acquire a 12.5% interest may be exercised beginning August 19, 2012 through August 19, 2014. If the first option is exercised, the second option to acquire an additional 12.5% may be exercised beginning August 19, 2013 through August 19, 2015.


38

Table of Contents

On June 12, 2009, a purported civil class action was filed against the Company, Era Group Inc., Era Helicopters LLC and three other defendants (collectively, the “Defendants”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, Superior Offshore International, Inc. v. Bristow Group Inc., et al., No. 09-CV-438 (D. Del.).  The Complaint alleges that the Defendants violated federal antitrust law by conspiring with each other to raise, fix, maintain or stabilize prices for offshore helicopter services in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico during the period January 2001 to December 2005.  The purported class of plaintiffs includes all direct purchasers of such services and the relief sought includes compensatory damages and treble damages.  The Company believes that the claims set forth in the Complaint are without merit and intends to vigorously defend the action.  On September 4, 2009, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint.  On September 14, 2010, the Court entered an order dismissing the Complaint.  On September 28, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration and amendment and a motion for re-argument (the “Motions”).  On November 30, 2010, the Court granted the Motions, amended the Court's September 14, 2010 Order to clarify that the dismissal was without prejudice, permitted the filing of an amended Complaint, and authorized limited discovery with respect to the new allegations in the amended Complaint.  Following the completion of such limited discovery, on February 11, 2011, the Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the amended Complaint with prejudice.  On June 23, 2011, the Court granted summary judgment for the Defendants.  On July 22, 2011, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.  On August 9, 2011, Defendants moved for certain excessive costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. That motion is fully briefed and a decision is pending. On October 11, 2011, the plaintiffs filed their opening appeal brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. That motion was fully briefed and oral argument completed on March 20, 2012. The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these claims but believes they are without merit and will continue to vigorously defend the action.

On July 14, 2010, a group of individuals and entities purporting to represent a class commenced a civil action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Terry G. Robin, et al. v. Seacor Marine, L.L.C., et al., No. 2:10-cv-01986 (E.D. La.) (the “Robin Case”), in which they assert that support vessels, including vessels owned by the Company, responding to the explosion and resulting fire that occurred aboard the semi-submersible drilling rig, the Deepwater Horizon, were negligent in their efforts to save lives and put out the fire and contributed to the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon and subsequent oil spill. The action now is part of the overall multi-district litigation, In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon”, MDL No. 2179 (“MDL”). The complaint seeks compensatory, punitive, exemplary, and other damages.  In response to this lawsuit, the Company filed petitions seeking exoneration from, or limitation of liability in relation to, any actions that may have been taken by vessels owned by the Company to extinguish the fire.  Pursuant to the Limitation of Liability Act, those petitions imposed an automatic stay on the Robin Case, and the court set a deadline of April 20, 2011 for individual claimants to assert claims in the limitation cases.  Approximately 66 claims were submitted by the deadline in all of the limitation actions.  On June 8, 2011, the Company moved to dismiss these claims (with the exception of one claim filed by a Company employee) on various legal grounds.  On October 12, 2011, the Court granted the Company's motion to dismiss in its entirety, dismissing with prejudice all claims that had been filed against the Company in the limitation actions (with the exception of one claim filed by a Company employee that was not subject to the motion to dismiss).  The Court entered final judgments in favor of the Company in the Robin Case and each of the limitation actions on November 21, 2011.  On December 12, 2011, the claimants appealed each of those judgments to the Unites States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.  The claimants' opening brief was filed on March 26, 2012, and the Company's response brief is due on May 7, 2012.  The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from this matter but believes it is without merit and will continue to vigorously defend the action.

On July 20, 2010, two individuals purporting to represent a class commenced a civil action in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans in the State of Louisiana, John Wunstell, Jr. and Kelly Blanchard v. BP, et al., No. 2010-7437 (Division K) (the “Wunstell Action”), in which they assert, among other theories, that Mr. Wunstell suffered injuries as a result of his exposure to certain noxious fumes and chemicals in connection with the provision of remediation, containment and response services by O'Brien's. The action now is part of the overall MDL. The complaint also seeks to establish a “class-wide court-supervised medical monitoring program” for all individuals “participating in BP's Deepwater Horizon Vessels of Opportunity Program and/or Horizon Response Program” who allegedly experienced injuries similar to those of Mr. Wunstell. The Company believes this lawsuit has no merit and will seek its dismissal.  Pursuant to contractual agreements with the responsible party, the responsible party has agreed, subject to certain potential limitations, to indemnify and defend O'Brien's in connection with the Wunstell Action and claims asserted in the MDL.

On December 15, 2010, O'Brien's and then-SEACOR subsidiary National Response Corporation (“NRC”) were named as defendants in one of the several consolidated “master complaints” that have been filed in the overall MDL.  The master complaint naming O'Brien's and NRC as defendants asserts various claims on behalf of a putative class against multiple defendants concerning the clean-up activities generally, and the use of dispersants specifically.  By court order, the Wunstell Action has been stayed as a result of the filing of the referenced master complaint.  The Company believes that the claims asserted against O'Brien's and NRC in the master complaint have no merit and on February 28, 2011, O'Brien's and NRC moved to dismiss all claims against them in the master complaint on legal grounds.  On September 30, 2011, the Court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss that O'Brien's and NRC had filed (an amended decision was issued on October 4, 2011 that corrected several grammatical errors

39

Table of Contents

and non-substantive oversights in the original order).  Although the Court refused to dismiss the referenced master complaint in its entirety at that time, the Court did recognize the validity of the “derivative immunity” and “implied preemption” arguments that O'Brien's and NRC advanced and has directed O'Brien's and NRC to (i) conduct limited discovery to develop evidence to support those arguments and (ii) then re-assert the arguments.  A schedule for such limited discovery and future motion practice has been established by the Court and currently contemplates that O'Brien's and NRC will file motions re-asserting their derivative immunity and implied preemption arguments on May 18, 2012.  The Court did, however, dismiss all state-law claims and certain other claims that had been asserted in the referenced master complaint, and dismissed the claims of all plaintiffs that have failed to allege a legally-sufficient injury.  In addition to the indemnity provided to O'Brien's, pursuant to contractual agreements with the responsible party, the responsible party has agreed, subject to certain potential limitations, to indemnify and defend O'Brien's and NRC in connection with these claims in the MDL. 

Subsequent to the filing of the referenced master complaint, four additional individual civil actions have been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana concerning the clean-up activities generally, which name the Company, O'Brien's and/or NRC as defendants and are part of the overall MDL. On April 8, 2011, O'Brien's was named as a defendant in Johnson Bros. Corporation of Louisiana v. BP, PLC, et al., No. 2:11-cv-00781 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by an individual business seeking damages allegedly caused by a delay on a construction project alleged to have resulted from the clean-up operations. On April 15, 2011, O'Brien's and NRC were named as defendants in James and Krista Pearson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et al., No. 2:11-cv-00863 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by a husband and wife, who allegedly participated in the clean-up effort and are seeking damages for personal injury, property damage to their boat, and amounts allegedly due under contract. On April 15, 2011, O'Brien's and NRC were named as defendants in Thomas Edward Black v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et al., No. 2:11-cv-00867 (E.D. La.), which is a suit by an individual who is seeking damages for lost income because he allegedly could not find work in the fishing industry after the oil spill. On April 20, 2011, a complaint was filed in Darnell Alexander, et al. v. BP, PLC, et al., No. 2:11-cv-00951 (E.D. La.) on behalf of 117 individual plaintiffs that seek to adopt the allegations made in the referenced master complaint against O'Brien's and NRC (and the other defendants). By court order, all four of these additional individual cases have been stayed as a result of the filing of the referenced master complaint.  The Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from this matter but believes it is without merit and does not expect this matter will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

On February 18, 2011, Triton Asset Leasing GmbH, Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc., and Transocean Deepwater Inc. (collectively “Transocean”) named O'Brien's and NRC as third-party defendants in a Rule 14(c) Third-Party Complaint in Transocean's own Limitation of Liability Act action, which is part of the overall MDL, tendering to O'Brien's and NRC the claims in the referenced master complaint that have already been asserted against O'Brien's and NRC. Transocean, Cameron International Corporation, Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., M-I L.L.C., Weatherford U.S., L.P., and Weatherford International, Inc. have also filed cross-claims against O'Brien's and NRC for contribution and tort indemnity should they be found liable for any damages in Transocean's Limitation of Liability Act action and O'Brien's and NRC have asserted counterclaims against those same parties for identical relief.  As provided above, the Company is unable to estimate the potential exposure, if any, resulting from these actions but believes they are without merit and does not expect this matter will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations.
        
Separately, on March 2, 2012, the Court announced that BP Exploration & Production Inc. and BP America Production Company (collectively "BP") and the plaintiffs had reached an agreement on the terms of two proposed class action settlements that will resolve, among other things, plaintiffs' economic loss claims and clean-up related claims against BP.  The parties filed their proposed settlement agreements on April 18, 2012 along with motions seeking preliminary approval of the settlements, and the Court held a hearing on April 25, 2012 to consider those motions but has yet to make a ruling.   Although neither the Company, O'Brien's or NRC are parties to the settlement agreements, the Company, O'Brien's and NRC are listed on the releases accompanying both settlement agreements, such that if the settlement agreements are approved by the Court as currently drafted, any plaintiffs that settle will be required to release their claims against the Company, O'Brien's and NRC.

In the course of the Company's business, it may agree to indemnify a party.  If the indemnified party makes a successful claim for indemnification, the Company would be required to reimburse that party in accordance with the terms of the indemnification agreement.  Indemnification agreements generally are subject to threshold amounts, specified claim periods and other restrictions and limitations. 

In connection with the disposition of the NRC Entities of the Company's Environmental Services Business Segment (the “NRC Entities”) on March 16, 2012, the Company remains contingently liable for certain obligations of the NRC Entities, including potential liabilities relating to work performed in connection with the Oil Spill Response.  These potential liabilities may not exceed the purchase consideration received by the Company for the NRC Entities and the Company currently is indemnified under contractual agreements with BP.


40

Table of Contents

In the normal course of its business, the Company becomes involved in various other litigation matters including, among other things, claims by third parties for alleged property damages and personal injuries. Management has used estimates in determining the Company’s potential exposure to these matters and has recorded reserves in its financial statements related thereto where appropriate. It is possible that a change in the Company’s estimates of such exposure could occur, but the Company does not expect that any change in estimated exposure would have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

In 2011, the Company received a Notice of Infringement (the “Notice”) from the Brazilian Federal Revenue Office. The Notice alleged the Company had imported a number of vessels into Brazil without properly completing the required importation documents and levied an assessment of $25.7 million. The Company intends to vigorously defend its position that the proposed assessment is erroneous and believes the resolution of this matter will not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or its results of operations. Of the levied assessment, $19.3 million relates to managed vessels whose owner would be responsible to reimburse any potential payment.

41

Table of Contents

ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

For a discussion of the Company’s exposure to market risk, refer to Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. There has been no significant change in the Company’s exposure to market risk during the Current Year Quarter, except as described below.

As of March 31, 2012, the Company had capital purchase commitments of €66.0 million ($88.1 million). An adverse change of 10% in the underlying foreign currency exchange rate would increase the U.S. dollar equivalent of these non-hedged purchase commitments by $5.7 million, net of tax.

As of March 31, 2012, Era Group Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, had outstanding variable rate borrowings of $290.0 million under the terms of its senior secured revolving credit facility. The average borrowing rate as of March 31, 2012 was 3.2%. An adverse change of 10% in LIBOR would result in additional annual interest expense of $0.1 million, net of tax.


ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

With the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, management evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of March 31, 2012. Based on their evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2012.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the Current Year Quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.



42

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a description of developments with respect to pending legal proceedings described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, see Part I, Item II, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Contingencies".


ITEM 2.
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(c)
This table provides information with respect to purchases by the Company of shares of its Common Stock during the Current Year Quarter:
Period
Total Number  Of
Shares
Purchased
 
Average Price  Paid
Per Share
 
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly  Announced
Plans or Programs
 
Maximum Value of
Shares that may Yet be
Purchased under  the
Plans or Programs(1)
January 1 – 31, 2012

 
$

 

 
$
150,000,000

February 1 – 29, 2012

 
$

 

 
$
150,000,000

March 1 – 31, 2012

 
$

 

 
$
150,000,000

 ______________________
(1)
Since February 1997, SEACOR’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of Common Stock, certain debt or a combination thereof. From time to time thereafter, and most recently on January 18, 2012, SEACOR's Board of Directors increased the authority to repurchase Common Stock.

ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.


ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS
 
31.1
 
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
 
 
31.2
 
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
 
 
32.1
 
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
32.2
 
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
101.INS**
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
101.SCH**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
 
 
101.CAL**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
 
 
101.DEF**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
 
 
101.LAB**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
 
 
101.PRE**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
______________________ 
**
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.


43

Table of Contents


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 
SEACOR Holdings Inc. (Registrant)
 
 
 
 
DATE:
May 2, 2012
By:
 
/S/ CHARLES FABRIKANT
 
 
 
 
Charles Fabrikant, Executive Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
DATE:
May 2, 2012
By:
 
/S/ RICHARD RYAN
 
 
 
 
Richard Ryan, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


44

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

31.1
 
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
 
 
31.2
 
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
 
 
32.1
 
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
32.2
 
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 
101.INS**
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
101.SCH**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
 
 
101.CAL**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
 
 
101.DEF**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
 
 
101.LAB**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
 
 
101.PRE**
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
______________________ 
**
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.


45