UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

 

TELADOC, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

 

 

TELADOC, INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on May 25, 2017

Dear Stockholders:

We cordially invite you to attend the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Teladoc, Inc. (“Teladoc” or the “Company”). Our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. EDT and will be a completely virtual meeting of stockholders. You will be able to attend the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, vote and submit your questions during the meeting via live webcast by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TDOC2017. To enter the meeting, you must have your sixteen-digit control number that is shown on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) or on your proxy card if you elected to receive proxy materials by mail. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person.

Details regarding logging onto and attending the meeting over the website and the business to be conducted are described in the Notice you received in the mail. We have also made available a copy of our 2016 Annual Report with the accompanying proxy statement. We encourage you to read our Annual Report. It includes our audited financial statements and provides information about our business and products.

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon the following matters, all of which are more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:

The Board of Directors of the Company recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” each of the proposals above.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 31, 2017 may vote at the meeting or any postponement(s) or adjournment(s) of the meeting.

 

April [__], 2017

HOW TO VOTE: Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we hope you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote over the Internet, as well as by telephone or, if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, by mailing a proxy or voting instruction card. Please review the instructions on each of your voting options described in the accompanying proxy statement as well as in the Notice you received in the mail.

 

 

2017 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

Teladoc, Inc.

2 Manhattanville Road, Suite 203

Purchase, New York 10577

(203) 635‑2002

www.teladoc.com

2017 PROXY STATEMENT

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Teladoc, Inc. (“Teladoc” or the “Company”) is furnishing you this proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TDOC2017 on Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. EDT. At the meeting, stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon the following matters:

By submitting your proxy (via the Internet, telephone or mail), you authorize Mr. Adam C. Vandervoort, Teladoc’s Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, and Mr. Mark Hirschhorn, Teladoc’s Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to represent you and vote your shares at the meeting in accordance with your instructions. They also may vote your shares to adjourn the meeting and will be authorized to vote your shares at any postponement(s) or adjournment(s) of the meeting.

Teladoc’s 2016 Annual Report, which includes Teladoc’s audited financial statements, is being made available to Teladoc’s stockholders concurrently herewith. Although the 2016 Annual Report is being made available concurrently with this proxy statement, it does not constitute a part of the proxy solicitation materials and is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

We are first making this proxy statement and accompanying materials available to stockholders on or about April [__], 2017.

We will be hosting the Annual Meeting live via the Internet. A summary of the information you need to attend the meeting online is provided below:

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE PROMPTLY VOTE YOUR SHARES OVER THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR BY MAIL.

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

Why am I receiving this proxy statement?

Teladoc is soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting. You are receiving a proxy statement because you owned shares of Teladoc common stock at the close of business on March 31, 2017, the record date for the Annual Meeting, which entitles you to vote at the Annual Meeting. By use of a proxy, you can vote whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting. This proxy statement describes the matters on which we would like you to vote and provides information on those matters so that you can make an informed decision.

What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?

At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon the following matters:

Our Bylaws require stockholders to give advance notice of any proposal intended to be presented at the meeting. The deadline for this notice has passed and we have not received any such notices. If any other matter properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the online meeting, however, the proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with their best judgment.

Why is the Annual Meeting being webcast?

The Annual Meeting is being held on a virtual-only basis in order to reach the broadest number of stockholders possible and to save costs relative to holding a physical meeting.

Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

In accordance with rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are permitted to furnish proxy materials, including this proxy statement and our 2016 Annual Report, to our stockholders by providing access to such documents on the Internet instead of mailing printed copies. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials. Most stockholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, the Notice, which was mailed to our stockholders, will instruct you as to how you may access and review all of the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice also instructs you as to how you may submit your proxy on the Internet. If you would like to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice. If you vote by Internet or telephone, please do not also mail your proxy card.

Who is entitled to vote?

The record date for the meeting is March 31, 2017. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date are entitled to vote at the meeting. The only class of stock entitled to be voted at the meeting is Teladoc common stock. Each outstanding share of common stock is entitled to one vote for all matters before the meeting. At the close of business on the record date, there were [54,304,487] shares of Teladoc common stock outstanding.

A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for examination on the Internet through the virtual web conference during the Annual Meeting.

Am I entitled to vote if my shares are held in “street name”?

If your shares are held by a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in “street name.” If your shares are held in street name, the proxy materials are being made available to you by your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, as the record holder, along with voting instructions. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your record holder how to vote your shares, and the record holder is required to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. We encourage you to provide specific instructions to your broker by returning your proxy card or by voting electronically via the Internet or by telephone, if permitted by the broker or other nominee that holds your shares. This ensures that your shares will be properly voted at the Annual Meeting.

How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

Shares of our common stock represented by proxies that are marked “ABSTAIN,” or which constitute broker non-votes, will be counted as present at the meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum. Under the rules that govern brokers who have record ownership of shares that are held in “street name” for their clients, brokers may vote such shares on behalf of their clients with respect to “routine” matters (such as the ratification of auditors), but not with respect to non-routine matters (such as the election of directors, the approval of an equity incentive award plan, the approval of an amendment to the Certificate or a proposal submitted by a stockholder). If the proposals to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting include both routine and non-routine matters, the broker may turn in a proxy card for uninstructed shares that votes on the routine matters, but expressly states that the broker is not voting on non-routine matters. This is called a “broker non-vote” as to non-routine matters.

Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the results of the vote on the election of directors, the approval of the amendment and restatement of the Incentive Award Plan or the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP. However, abstentions will have the effect of a vote against approval of each of the amendments to the Certificate.

How can I vote my shares without attending the online meeting?

Whether you hold shares directly as the stockholder of record or beneficially in street name, you may direct how your shares are voted without attending the online meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote by proxy. You can vote by proxy over the Internet or telephone by following the instructions provided in the Notice, or, if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, you can also vote by mail pursuant to instructions provided on the proxy card. If you hold shares beneficially in street name, you may also vote by proxy over the Internet or telephone, or, if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, you can also vote by mail by following the voting instruction card provided to you by your broker, bank, trustee or nominee.

Proxies submitted electronically or by telephone as described above must be received by 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 24, 2017. Proxies submitted by mail should be received before 10:00 a.m. EDT on May 24, 2017.

If you submit a proxy but do not indicate any voting instructions, your shares will be voted:

Can I revoke my proxy and change my vote?

You may change your vote at any time prior to the taking of the vote at the online meeting. If you are the stockholder of record, you may change your vote by:

Attendance at the online meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request. For shares you hold beneficially in street name, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank, trustee or nominee following the instructions they provided, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or nominee giving you the right to vote your shares, by attending the online meeting and voting.

How many shares must be present to hold the online meeting?

A quorum must be present at the meeting for any business to be conducted. The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding on the record date will constitute a quorum. Proxies received but marked as abstentions or treated as broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the meeting.

If a quorum is not present or represented at the meeting, the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting who are present in person or represented by proxy, or the chairman of the meeting, may adjourn the meeting until a quorum is present or represented. The time and place of the adjourned meeting will be announced at the time the adjournment is taken, and no other notice will be given.

How can I vote my shares during the online meeting?

The Company will be hosting the Annual Meeting live online. You can attend the Annual Meeting live online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TDOC2017. The webcast will start at 2:00 p.m. EDT. You may vote and submit questions while attending the meeting online. You will need the sixteen-digit control number included on your Notice or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials) in order to be able to enter the meeting.

Shares held in your name as the stockholder of record may be voted by you, while the polls remain open, at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TDOC2017 during the meeting. You will need your control number found in the Notice. Shares held beneficially in street name may be voted by you at the meeting only if you obtain a legal proxy from the broker, bank, trustee or nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares. Even if you plan to attend the online meeting, we recommend that you also submit your proxy or voting instructions as described above so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the online meeting.

Will my vote be kept confidential?

Yes, your vote will be kept confidential and not disclosed to Teladoc unless:

Who will count the votes?

Broadridge Financial Solutions, an independent third party, will tabulate and certify the votes. A representative of Broadridge Financial Solutions will serve as the inspector of election.

How does the Board recommend I vote on the proposals?

The Board recommends that you vote:

What vote is required to approve each proposal and how are votes counted?

 

Is Teladoc an “Emerging Growth Company?”

Yes. We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”) and, as such, have elected to comply with certain reduced public company reporting requirements. These reduced reporting requirements include reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements and no non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our initial public offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.0 billion, or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period.

Who can help answer my questions regarding the Annual Meeting or the proposals?

You may contact Teladoc to assist you with your questions. You may reach Teladoc at:

Teladoc, Inc.

Attention: Investor Relations

2 Manhattanville Road, Suite 203

Purchase, New York 10577

(914)  265‑6706

MacKenzie Partners, Inc.

105 Madison Avenue

New York, NY 10016

(800) 322‑2885

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our Board oversees the management of the Company and its business for the benefit of our stockholders in order to enhance stockholder value over the long term. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to assist it in the exercise of its responsibilities. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are reviewed annually and periodically amended as the Board enhances the Company’s corporate governance practices.

The Board has also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees. The purpose of this code is to promote honest and ethical conduct for conducting the business of the Company consistent with the highest standards of business ethics. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics establishes our policies and expectations with respect to a wide range of business conduct, including the preparation and maintenance of our financial and accounting information, our compliance with laws and possible conflicts of interest.

We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), regarding any amendment to, or waiver from a material provision of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics involving our principal executive, financial or accounting officer or controller by posting such information on our website. The Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are available on our website at ir.teladoc.com by clicking through “Corporate Governance.”

Board of Directors and Committees

Board Leadership Structure

Our governance framework provides the Board with the flexibility to select the appropriate leadership structure for Teladoc. This will be driven by the needs of the Company as well as the particular makeup of the Board at any point in time. As a result, no policy exists requiring the combination or separation of leadership roles, and Teladoc’s governing documents do not mandate a particular structure.

Our current leadership structure consists of the Chairman of the Board, a separate Chief Executive Officer and strong, active independent directors. The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for setting the strategic direction of the Company and for the day-to-day leadership and management of the Company, while the Chairman of the Board provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer, directs the agenda for Board meetings and presides over meetings of the full Board. Another component of our leadership structure is the active role played by our independent directors in overseeing the Company’s business, both at the Board and Committee level.

Consistent with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, 11 of 12 of our current directors are considered independent within the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), the non-independent member being Jason Gorevic, our President and Chief Executive Officer. In addition, all members of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees satisfy the applicable independence criteria of the SEC and NYSE. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and that at least two members of the Audit Committee, Messrs. Shedlarz and Goldstein, are “audit committee financial experts” as such term is defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.

At least annually, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee discusses the structure and composition of the Board and reviews the current leadership structure. This is discussed with the full Board as part of the Board’s annual evaluation to assess its effectiveness and takes into account our current business plans and long-term strategy, as well as the particular makeup of the Board at that time.

The Board held the following meetings during 2016, either in person or by teleconference: 12 full-Board meetings; five Audit Committee meetings; seven Compensation Committee meetings; six Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meetings; and three Quality of Care and Patient Safety Committee meetings. During 2016, each of our directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of: (i) the total number of meetings of the full Board; and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which he or she served. Under Teladoc’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors are expected to be active and engaged in discharging their duties and to keep

themselves informed about Company business and operations. Each director is expected to attend the Annual Meeting. All of our directors that were directors at the time of the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders attended the 2016 annual meeting.

Non-employee Board members meet without management present at least quarterly, at regularly scheduled executive sessions. Mr. Snow, Chairman of the Board, presides over meetings of the non-employee and independent directors. The purpose of these sessions is to promote open discussions among the independent directors concerning the business and affairs of the Company as well as matters concerning management, without any member of management present.

Committees of the Board

The Board has four standing committees: Audit; Compensation; Nominating and Corporate Governance; and Quality of Care and Patient Safety. The charters for the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are available on our website at ir.teladoc.com by clicking through “Corporate Governance.”

Audit Committee. The principal functions of the Audit Committee are to: (i) select, approve the compensation of and assess the independence of an independent registered public accounting firm for us; (ii) review and approve management’s plan for engaging Teladoc’s independent registered public accounting firm during the year to perform non-audit services and consider what effect these services will have on the independence of Teladoc’s independent registered public accounting firm; (iii) review our annual financial statements and other financial reports which require review and/or approval by the Board; (iv) oversee the integrity of our financial statements and our systems of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (v) review the scope of audit plans of our independent registered public accounting firm and the results of its audit; (vi) evaluate the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm; (vii) review our earnings releases; (viii) review all related-party transactions for potential conflicts of interest and approve all such transactions; and (ix) review and evaluate Teladoc’s risk management plans, including relating specifically to information technology security and data privacy compliance.  Mr. Shedlarz is Chairman of the Audit Committee. Messrs. Goldstein, Mawhinney and Outland are members of the Audit Committee.

Compensation Committee. The principal functions of the Compensation Committee are to: (i) review and approve corporate goals and objectives relative to the compensation of our President and Chief Executive Officer; (ii) evaluate the performance of our President and Chief Executive Officer in light of such corporate goals and objectives and determine his compensation; (iii) review and approve the compensation of our other senior officers; (iii) review and establish our overall management compensation, philosophy and policy; (iv) administer and oversee the Incentive Award Plan, the Teladoc, Inc. 2015 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Employee Stock Purchase Plan”) and the Teladoc, Inc. 2017 Employment Inducement Incentive Award Plan (the “Inducement Plan”); (v) evaluate and assess potential and current compensation advisors in accordance with the applicable independence standards set by the NYSE; (vi) retain and approve the compensation of any compensation advisor; (vii) review and approve our policies and procedures for equity-based incentive awards; (viii) review and make recommendations to the Board concerning our director compensation; and (ix) ratify the report required by the rules of the SEC to be included in our annual proxy statement. Mr. McKinley is Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Messrs. Multani, Shedlarz and Snow are members of the Compensation Committee.

The compensation committee has the authority to retain or obtain the advice of compensation consultants, legal counsel and other advisors (independent or otherwise) to assist in carrying out its responsibilities and may delegate its authority under its charter to one or more subcommittees as it deems appropriate from time to time. The compensation committee may also delegate to an officer the authority to grant equity awards to certain employees, as further described in its charter and subject to the terms of our equity plans.

In 2016, the Compensation Committee engaged Radford, a compensation consulting firm, to assess and make recommendations with respect to the amount and types of compensation to provide our executives and directors. Radford reported directly to the Compensation Committee; however, our Chief Executive Officer consulted with Radford with respect to its assessments of the compensation of executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee reviewed compensation assessments provided by Radford comparing our compensation to

that of a group of peer companies within our industry and met with Radford to discuss compensation of our executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, and to receive input and advice. The Compensation Committee has considered the adviser independence factors required under SEC rules as they relate to Radford and does not believe Radford’s work in 2016 raised a conflict of interest.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The principal functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are to: (i) develop and recommend to the Board criteria for Board and committee membership; (ii) establish procedures for identifying and evaluating director candidates, including nominees recommended by stockholders; (iii) identify individuals qualified to become Teladoc directors; (iv) recommend to the Board nominees for election as directors and to each of the Board’s committees; (v) oversee the annual evaluation of the Board and its committees; (vi) review and discuss with the Board corporate succession plans for our President and Chief Executive Officer and for other key officers; and (vi) oversee the development and administration of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Mr. Snow is Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Dr. Frist, Mr. Goldstein and Mr. Paulus are members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Quality of Care and Patient Safety Committee. The Quality of Care and Patient Safety Committee is governed by a written charter adopted in April 2016. The Quality of Care and Patient Safety Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the review of our policies and procedures relating to the delivery of quality medical care to our members. The Quality of Care and Patient Safety Committee maintains communication between the Board and the senior officers with management responsibility for medical care and reviews matters concerning or relating to the quality of medical care delivered to our members, efforts to advance the quality of medical care provided and patient safety. Dr. Frist is Chairman of the Quality of Care and Patient Safety Committee. Messrs. Felsenthal and Paulus and Ms. Darling are members of the Quality of Care and Patient Safety Committee.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

The Board administers its risk oversight function directly and through the Audit Committee. The Board and the Audit Committee regularly discuss with management, and the Company’s independent auditors, our major risk exposures, their potential financial impact on Teladoc and the steps we take to manage these risks.

In general, management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks Teladoc faces, while the Board, acting as a whole and through the Audit Committee, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, the Board has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed. Senior management attends the regular meetings of the Board and is available to address questions and concerns raised by the Board on risk management-related and other matters. This combination provides us with the focus, scope, expertise and continuous attention necessary for effective risk management.

The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to risk management in the areas of financial reporting, internal controls, cybersecurity and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. In addition, the Audit Committee discusses policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management with management and the independent auditors.

The Audit Committee assists the Board with oversight of risk management by reviewing the Company’s financial statements and meeting with the Company’s independent auditors at regularly scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee, to review their reports on the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal control systems and discusses with management the Company’s major financial risks and exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such risks and exposures.

In addition, our Compensation Committee assists our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks arising from our compensation policies and programs, and retains outside compensation and legal experts for that purpose. In establishing and reviewing our compensation philosophy and programs, we consider whether such programs encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking. We believe that our executive compensation program does not encourage excessive or unnecessary risk taking. This is primarily due to the fact that our compensation programs are designed to encourage our executive officers and other employees to remain

focused on both short-term and long-term strategic goals. As a result, we do not believe that our compensation programs are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also assists our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of risks associated with the organization, membership and structure of the Board, succession planning for our directors and corporate governance. Our Quality of Care and Patient Safety Committee does so with respect to the management of risks associated with the quality of medical care delivered to our members, efforts to advance the quality of medical care provided and patient safety.

Classified Board of Directors

Our Certificate and our Bylaws provide that the number of our directors shall be fixed from time to time by a resolution of the majority of the Board. Immediately prior to the Annual Meeting, our Board will consist of 12 members. Historically, our Board has been divided into three staggered classes of directors as nearly equal in number as possible. One class is elected each year at the annual meeting of stockholders for a term of three years. The term of the Class II directors expires at the Annual Meeting. The term of the Class III directors expires at the 2018 annual meeting and the term of the Class I directors expires at the 2019 annual meeting. After the initial terms expire, directors are expected to be elected to hold office for a three-year term or until the election and qualification of their successors in office. Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one third of the directors. The classes are as follows:

As described in Subproposal 1(b), our Board approved an amendment to our Certificate to eliminate the classified Board and recommended that the amendment be submitted to the stockholders for approval. If Subproposal 1(b) is approved, in order to make the declassification of the Board effective at this Annual Meeting under Delaware law, each member of our Board whose term does not expire at this Annual Meeting will resign, effective upon stockholder approval of Subproposal 1(b) and the filing of a certificate of amendment to our Certificate with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. All directors (with the exception of Messrs. Felsenthal and Outland) will then stand for election to a one-year term. If Subproposal 1(b) is not approved, we will continue to have a staggered board and the Class II directors will stand for election to a three-year term expiring at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.

Identifying and Evaluating Director-Nominees

The Board is responsible for selecting its own members. It delegates the selection and nomination process to its Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, with the expectation that other members of the Board, and management, will be requested to take part in the process as appropriate.

Generally, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies candidates for director-nominees in consultation with management, through the use of search firms or other advisors, through the recommendations submitted by stockholders or current directors or through such other methods as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee deems to be helpful to identify candidates. All directors appointed to the Board since the 2016 annual meeting were identified and recommended by sitting members of the Board.

Once candidates have been identified, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee confirms that the candidates meet all of the minimum qualifications for director-nominees established by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may gather information about the candidates through interviews, detailed questionnaires, comprehensive background checks or any other means that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee deems to be appropriate in the evaluation process. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee then meets as a group to discuss and evaluate the qualities and skills of each candidate, both on an individual basis and taking into account the overall composition and needs of the Board. Based on

the results of the evaluation process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends candidates for the Board’s approval as director-nominees for election to the Board.

When assessing director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider such nominee’s qualifications, skills and attributes, including depth and breadth of professional experience and independence. Such nominee must, at a minimum, have demonstrated exceptional ability and judgment and, to the extent it can be ascertained, be of the highest personal and professional integrity. The Nominating and Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity. However, the Board seeks to have a Board that reflects an appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise and diversity, as applicable to our industry. The Board assesses its achievement of diversity through the review of Board composition as part of the Board’s annual self-assessment process.

Stockholders may submit recommendations for director candidates to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by sending the individual’s name and qualifications to our corporate secretary at Teladoc, Inc., 2 Manhattanville Road, Suite 203, Purchase, New York 10577, who will forward all recommendations to the Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate any candidate recommended by stockholders against the same criteria and pursuant to the same policies and procedures applicable to the evaluation of candidates proposed by directors or management. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has full discretion in considering all nominations to the Board. Alternatively, stockholders who would like to nominate a candidate for director (in lieu of making a recommendation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee) must comply with the requirements described in this proxy statement and our Bylaws. See “Additional Information—Procedures for Submitting Stockholder Proposals.”

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Company encourages its executive officers and directors to purchase shares of Teladoc’s common stock and to maintain a minimum ownership level during his or her tenure to foster alignment with our investing stockholders. To reinforce this objective, in early 2017 we adopted minimum stock ownership guidelines for our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Operating Officer, certain other executive officers and all of our non-management directors. Pursuant to those guidelines, our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Operating Officer and certain other executive officers must hold a number of shares of Teladoc’s common stock equal to three, two and one times such executive officer’s base salary, respectively, and our non-management directors must hold a number of shares of Teladoc’s common stock equal to three times the annual cash retainer paid to such non-management directors for board service. Our executive officers and non-management directors subject to the ownership guidelines must be in compliance with this policy by the later of February 23, 2022 or five years after they become an executive officer or non-management director of Teladoc, as applicable.

Insider Trading Policy

We maintain an Insider Trading Compliance Policy that applies to all securities issued by the Company, including common stock, options to purchase shares of common stock, preferred stock and any other type of security that the Company may issue or that relates to the Company’s securities. Company officers, directors and employees are prohibited from engaging in hedging transactions, including purchasing Teladoc stock on margin or engaging in transactions in puts, calls or other derivative securities designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of Teladoc’s equity securities. Additionally, our Incentive Award Plan and Inducement Plan prohibit the pledging of awards granted under the respective plan.

Communications with Directors

You may communicate directly with any member or committee of the Board by writing to: Teladoc Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, 2 Manhattanville Road, Suite 203, Purchase, New York 10577. Please specify to whom your letter should be directed. Our corporate secretary will review all such correspondence and regularly forward to the Board a summary of all such correspondence and copies of all correspondence that, in his opinion, deals with the functions of the Board or its committees or that he otherwise determines requires the attention of any member, group or committee of the Board. Board members may, at any time, review a log of all correspondence received by Teladoc that is addressed to Board members and request copies of any such correspondence.

Interested parties who wish to communicate with non-management Teladoc directors, or with the presiding director of the Board’s executive sessions, may do so by writing to Teladoc Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, Attn: Non-management Directors or the Presiding Director for executive sessions, as applicable, 2 Manhattanville Road, Suite 203, Purchase, New York 10577. All such mail received will first be opened and screened for security purposes.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table provides information for the year ended December 31, 2016 regarding all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to each person who served as a non-employee member of our Board during some portion of that year.  Mr. Gorevic, who is also our President and Chief Executive Officer, received no compensation for his service as a director. Refer to “Executive Compensation––2016 Summary Compensation Table” and the narrative description thereto for information regarding Mr. Gorevic’s compensation from us during 2016.

Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy

The Board’s non-employee director compensation policy is designed to provide a total compensation package that enables us to attract and retain, on a long-term basis, high-caliber, non-employee directors. The policy is reviewed and revised annually by the Compensation Committee and the full Board with reference to the policies of each of the members of a peer group of similar companies selected by the Compensation Committee in consultation with its outside advisor. Under the policy, all non-employee directors are paid cash compensation as set forth below. Annual retainers

for non-employee members of our Board are in addition to the annual retainers for chairpersons and members of the committees of our Board. Cash retainers are prorated for a partial year of service. In addition to the amounts set forth below, on the date of the Annual Meeting, each continuing non-employee director who has served on the Board for the previous six months receives an option to purchase shares of our common stock with a value, determined using the Black-Scholes options pricing model that we used most recently (relative to the date of the award) in preparing the consolidated financial statements for the quarterly reports we file with the SEC, equal to $140,000. Each non-employee director who is initially elected or appointed to the Board after June 22, 2016 receives an option to purchase shares of our common stock with a value, determined using the Black-Scholes options pricing model that we used most recently (relative to the date of the award) in preparing the consolidated financial statements for the quarterly reports we file with the SEC, equal to $210,000.

 

In March 2017, the Board approved certain changes to our non-employee director compensation policy. As a result, effective March 21, 2017,  (i) the annual retainer for the Chairman of our Board was increased from $20,000 to $30,000 and (ii) the non-employee director compensation policy was revised to clarify that a portion of the option awards provided to non-employee directors thereunder may, at the election of the Board, instead be paid in restricted stock units of equivalent value.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Procedures for Approval of Related-Party Transactions

The Board reviews and approves transactions with directors, officers and holders of 5% or more of our capital stock and their affiliates, each of whom we refer to as a “related party.” We have adopted a written Related-Party Transaction Policy that governs the review of related-party transactions. Pursuant to this policy, the Audit Committee reviews the material facts of all related-party transactions. The Audit Committee takes into account, among other factors that it deems appropriate, whether the related-party transaction is on terms no less favorable to us than terms generally available in a transaction with an unrelated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related party’s interest in the related-party transaction. Further, when stockholders are entitled to vote on a transaction with a related party, the material facts of the related party’s relationship or interest in the transaction are disclosed to the stockholders, who must approve the transaction in good faith. Pursuant to the policy, no director may participate in any approval of a related-party transaction to which he or she is a related party. The Audit Committee, as applicable, will then, in its sole discretion, either approve or disapprove the transaction.

Certain types of transactions, which would otherwise require individual review, have been pre-approved by the Audit Committee. These types of transactions include, for example, compensation to an officer where such compensation is required to be disclosed in our proxy statement and transactions where the interest of the related party arises only by way of a directorship or minority stake in another organization that is a party to the transaction. Additionally, pursuant to the terms of our related-party transaction policy, all related-party transactions are required to be disclosed in our applicable filings as required by the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Exchange Act and related rules. Furthermore, any material related-party transactions are required to be disclosed to the full Board. We have established internal policies relating to disclosure controls and procedures, which include policies relating to the reporting of related-party transactions that must be pre-approved under our Related-Party Transaction Policy.

During 2016, there was not, and there is not currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were or will be a party for which the amount involved exceeds or will exceed $120,000 and in which any director, executive officer, holder of 5% or more of any class of our capital stock or any member of their immediate family had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2016, Messrs. McKinley, Multani and Shedlarz served as members of the Compensation Committee. No member of the Compensation Committee was an employee or officer of Teladoc during 2016, is a former officer of Teladoc, or had any other relationship with us requiring disclosure herein.

During the last fiscal year, none of our executive officers served as: (1) a member of the compensation committee (or other committee of the board of directors performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Compensation Committee; (2) a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Compensation Committee; or (3) a member of the compensation committee (or other committee of the board of directors performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors) of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Board.

PROPOSAL 1 – APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

After careful consideration and upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, our Board voted to approve, and to recommend to our stockholders that they approve, amendments to our Certificate to:

If the proposed amendments are approved by our stockholders, they will become effective upon the filing of a certificate of amendment to our Certificate with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, which we will do promptly after the Annual Meeting. The Board will approve any corresponding changes to our Bylaws. Our Board reserves the right, at any time prior to the effectiveness of the filing of the proposed certificate of amendment, to abandon the proposed amendments.

Because we consider Subproposals 1(b), 1(c), 1(d) or 1(e) to be interrelated, the approval of each of those Subproposals is conditioned on the approval of the others. Accordingly, if any of Subproposals 1(b), 1(c), 1(d) or 1(e) does not receive the required level of stockholder approval, none of the amendments proposed thereby will be made and the Company’s current Certificate and Bylaws will remain in place with respect to such provisions.

The full text of the proposed amendments to our Certificate is set forth in Appendix A to this proxy statement. The general description of provisions of our Certificate and the proposed amendments set forth herein are qualified in their entirety by reference to the text of Appendix A.

Vote Required

With respect to Subproposal 1(a) below, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the meeting is required to approve the Subproposal. With respect to Subproposals 1(b), 1(c), 1(d) and 1(e) below, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the meeting is required to approve each Subproposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as shares voted against each Subproposal. For the approval of each Subproposal, you may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” from voting on the Subproposal.

Subproposal 1(a) – Increase Number of Shares of Authorized Common Stock

General

Our Certificate currently authorizes the issuance of up to 75,000,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock. As of March 31, 2017, [54,304,487] shares of common stock were issued and outstanding, [9,337,819] shares of common stock were reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding options granted under our existing stock plans, [144,360] shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the Incentive Award Plan, [551,641] shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and [512,000] shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the Inducement Plan, leaving [10,149,693] shares of common stock unissued and unreserved. As of March 31, 2017, we had no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

In order to ensure sufficient shares of common stock will be available for issuance by us, the Board has approved, subject to stockholder approval, an amendment to the Certificate that increases the number of shares of such common stock authorized for issuance from 75,000,000 to 100,000,000. If the proposed amendment is approved, 25,000,000 additional shares of common stock would be authorized but unissued and unreserved, resulting in a total of [35,149,693] shares of common stock available for future issuance.

Purpose of the Amendment

We desire to authorize additional shares of common stock to ensure that enough shares will be available in the event the Board determines that it is necessary or appropriate to (i) raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities, (ii) acquire another company or its assets, (iii) provide equity incentives to employees and officers, (iv) permit future stock splits in the form of stock dividends or (v) satisfy other corporate purposes. The availability of additional shares of common stock is particularly important in the event that the Board needs to undertake any of the foregoing actions on an expedited basis and thus to avoid the time and expense of seeking stockholder approval in connection with the contemplated issuance of common stock. The Company has no immediate plans, arrangements, commitments or understandings with respect to issuance of any of the additional shares of common stock that would be authorized by the proposed amendment. However, the Board believes that the currently available number of unissued and unreserved shares is not sufficient to meet corporate needs in the future, including in connection with potential strategic acquisitions as we have made in the past.

Rights of Additional Authorized Shares

The additional authorized shares of common stock, if and when issued, would be part of the existing class of common stock and would have the same rights and privileges as the shares of common stock presently outstanding. Our stockholders do not have preemptive rights with respect to our common stock and the Board has no plans to grant such rights with respect to any such shares. Accordingly, should the Board elect to issue additional shares of our common stock, existing stockholders would not have any preferential rights to purchase the shares.

Potential Effects of the Amendment

The increase in authorized common stock will not have any immediate effect on the rights of existing stockholders. However, the Board will have the authority to issue authorized common stock without requiring future stockholder approval of such issuances, except as may be required by applicable law or the NYSE. For example, the rules of the NYSE require that we obtain stockholder approval prior to the issuance of shares of common stock in a private financing at a price less than the greater of the book value or market value of our common stock, where the total number of shares that may be issued pursuant to such transactions exceeds 20% of the outstanding common stock prior to issuance. To the extent that additional authorized shares are issued in the future, they may decrease the existing stockholders’ percentage equity ownership and, depending on the price at which they are issued, could be dilutive to the existing stockholders.

In addition, the availability of additional shares of our common stock for issuance could, under certain circumstances, discourage or make more difficult efforts to obtain control of the Company under a possible take-over scenario. The amendment is not presently intended for the purposes of effecting an anti-takeover device and is not proposed in response to any specific takeover threat known to the Board. Furthermore, this proposal is not part of any plan by the Board to adopt anti-takeover devices, and the Board currently has no present intention of proposing anti-takeover measures in the near future.

If the proposed amendment is not approved by our stockholders, it may impede the Company’s ability to raise capital should the need arise, and may cause the loss of significant business opportunities, which could adversely affect our financial performance, growth and ability to continue our operations.

Subproposal 1(b) – Declassify the Board of Directors

General

We are asking you to approve an amendment to our Certificate to eliminate the classified structure of our Board. If you approve this amendment, all directors elected by the stockholders at and after the Annual Meeting will be elected for one-year terms.

The Certificate currently divides the Board into three classes, with directors of each class being elected to serve three-year terms. This creates the staggered, or “classified,” board structure that we have used since becoming an

independent, publicly traded company in 2015. Under this structure, only one class of directors, constituting approximately one-third of the Board, is considered for election each year.

The proposed amendment would modify Article Eighth of the Certificate to eliminate our Board’s classified structure. If the amendment is adopted, then effective immediately upon such proposal, all of our Class I and Class III directors will resign, and all of the resigning directors (with the exception of Mr. Outland) will be nominated to stand for election to a one-year term expiring at our 2018 annual meeting, along with all of our Class II directors (with the exception of Mr. Felsenthal), whose term already expires at this Annual Meeting, and who have also been nominated to stand for election to a one-year term expiring at our 2018 annual meeting. As a result, assuming the proposed amendment is approved, at this Annual Meeting and at subsequent annual meetings, absent future changes to our board election procedures, all of our directors would be subject to election to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

Consistent with Delaware law for corporations having classified boards, the Certificate currently provides that directors may be removed from office only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds in voting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock of our Company entitled to vote thereon. In December 2015, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that if a Delaware corporation has neither a classified board of directors nor cumulative voting in the election of directors, provisions of such a corporation’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws providing that directors may be removed “only for cause” are contrary to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and are therefore invalid and unenforceable. The amendment provides that directors may be removed with or without cause in order to conform the Certificate to the requirement of Delaware law, as interpreted by this ruling.

Purpose of the Amendment

In making its determination, the Board considered arguments in favor of and against continuation of the classified board and determined that it is in the Company’s best interests to propose to declassify its Board. In its review, the Board considered the advantages of maintaining the classified Board structure, including that a classified Board structure promotes Board continuity and stability and encourages a long-term perspective by company management, because a majority of directors will always have experience as directors of the Company. Classified boards also provide protection against certain abusive takeover tactics and more time to solicit higher bids in a hostile takeover situation because it is more difficult to change a majority of directors on the board in a single year. While the Board continues to believe that these are important considerations, the Board also considered potential advantages of declassification, including the ability of stockholders to evaluate directors annually. Annually elected boards are perceived by many institutional stockholders as increasing the accountability of directors to such stockholders. After carefully weighing all of these considerations, the Board approved the proposed amendment to the Certificate and recommended that the stockholders adopt these amendments by voting in favor of this proposal.

If our stockholders do not approve this proposal, our directors will continue to be elected in three classes with staggered three-year terms and provisions of our Certificate relating to the removal of directors only for cause will not be amended.

Subproposal 1(c) – Eliminate Supermajority Voting Requirement for Removal of Directors

General

Our Certificate currently provides that directors may be removed only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds in voting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote thereon. In connection with the proposed declassification of the Board (and the related elimination of the “only for cause” director-removal standard), we are asking you to approve an amendment to our Certificate, the effect of which would be to replace the supermajority voting requirement for the removal of directors from office with a majority vote standard.

Purpose of the Amendment

After evaluation, the Board has determined that, in light of the proposed declassification of the Board (and the related elimination of the “only for cause” director-removal standard), it is in the best interests of stockholders to replace

the supermajority voting requirement for removal of directors from office with a majority vote standard. While the current supermajority voting requirement imposed by the Certificate is designed to ensure that interests of all stockholders are fully protected, the Board recognizes that there are different perspectives on this matter and compelling arguments for the elimination of the supermajority voting requirement, including increasing the accountability of directors to stockholders. After carefully weighing all of these considerations, the Board approved the proposed amendment to the Certificate and recommended that the stockholders adopt the amendment by voting in favor of this proposal.

If our stockholders do not approve this proposal, removal of directors from office will continue to require the affirmative vote of two-thirds in voting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote thereon.

Subproposal 1(d) – Eliminate Supermajority Voting Requirement for Amendment of Certain Provisions of Our Certificate

General

We are asking you to approve an amendment to our Certificate, the effect of which would be to eliminate supermajority voting requirements for approval of amendments to certain provisions of our Certificate. The Certificate currently requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds in voting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote thereon to amend or repeal, or to adopt any provision inconsistent with, the following provisions of our Certificate:

If the proposed amendment is approved and adopted by the stockholders, the relevant voting requirement to approve amendments to such provisions of our Certificate in the future would be a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote thereon.

Purpose of the Amendment

After evaluation, the Board has determined that, while the current supermajority voting requirements imposed by the Certificate are designed to ensure that interests of all stockholders are fully protected, the Board recognizes that there are different perspectives on this matter and compelling arguments for the elimination of supermajority voting requirements to amend a company’s charter, including growing sentiment that the elimination of such a provision provides stockholders greater ability to participate in the corporate governance of a company. The Board has also determined that an increasing number of companies are beginning to view such a voting requirement as overly burdensome. After carefully weighing all of these considerations, the Board approved the proposed amendment to the Certificate and recommended that the stockholders adopt these amendments by voting in favor of this proposal.

If our stockholders do not approve this proposal, amendment or repeal of the provisions of our Certificate referenced above will continue to require the approval of two-thirds in voting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote thereon.

Subproposal 1(e) – Eliminate Supermajority Voting Requirement for Amendment of Our Bylaws

General

We are asking you to approve an amendment to our Certificate, the effect of which would be to eliminate the supermajority voting requirement to amend, alter or repeal our Bylaws.

The Certificate currently provides that stockholders may not amend, alter or repeal our Bylaws, or adopt any provision inconsistent therewith, unless such action is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds in voting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote thereon. If the proposed amendment is approved and adopted by the stockholders, the relevant voting requirement to amend, alter or repeal the Bylaws in the future would be a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote thereon.

Purpose of the Amendment

After evaluation, the Board has determined that while the current voting requirement imposed by the Certificate is designed to ensure that interests of all stockholders are fully protected, the Board recognizes that there are different perspectives on this matter and compelling arguments for the elimination of supermajority voting requirements to amend a company’s bylaws, including growing sentiment that the elimination of such a provision provides stockholders greater ability to participate in the corporate governance of a company. The Board has also determined that an increasing number of companies are beginning to view such a voting requirement as overly burdensome. After carefully weighing all of these considerations, the Board approved the proposed amendment to the Certificate and recommended that the stockholders adopt these amendments by voting in favor of this proposal.

If our stockholders do not approve this proposal, amendment, alteration or repeal of provisions of our Bylaws will continue to require the approval of two-thirds in voting power of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company entitled to vote thereon.

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF EACH OF THE AMENDMENTS TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION.

PROPOSAL 2 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

General

Our Certificate and our Bylaws provide that the number of our directors shall be fixed from time to time by a resolution of the majority of the Board. Immediately prior to the Annual Meeting, our Board will consist of 12 members. Historically, our Board has been divided into three staggered classes of directors as nearly equal in number as possible. One class is elected each year at the annual meeting of stockholders for a term of three years. The term of the Class II directors expires at the Annual Meeting. The term of the Class III directors expires at the 2018 annual meeting and the term of the Class I directors expires at the 2019 annual meeting. After the initial terms expire, directors are expected to be elected to hold office for a three-year term or until the election and qualification of their successors in office.

Declassification Proposal

As described in Subproposal 1(b) above, our Board approved an amendment to our Certificate to eliminate the classified Board and recommended that the amendment be submitted to the stockholders for approval. If Subproposal 1(b) is approved, in order to make the declassification of the Board effective at this Annual Meeting under Delaware law, each member of our Board whose term does not expire at this Annual Meeting will resign, effective upon stockholder approval of Subproposal 1(b) and the filing of a certificate of amendment to our Certificate with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. All directors (with the exception of Messrs. Felsenthal and Outland) will then stand for election to a one-year term. If Subproposal 1(b) is not approved, we will continue to have a staggered board and the directors whose terms expire at this Annual Meeting, Messrs. Mawhinney, McKinley and Multani (but not Mr. Felsenthal), will stand for election to a three-year term expiring at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.

Director-Nominees

If Subproposal 1(b) is approved, our Board will be declassified and each of the ten directors elected at this Annual Meeting will serve for a one-year term expiring at the 2018 annual meeting and until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified. Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board has nominated Helen Darling, William H. Frist, M.D., Michael Goldstein, Jason Gorevic, Thomas Mawhinney, Thomas G. McKinley, Arneek Multani, Kenneth H. Paulus, David Shedlarz and David B. Snow, Jr. for election to the board for a one-year term.

In the event Subproposal 1(b) is not approved, our Board will remain classified and each Class I and Class III director (other than Mr. Outland) will continue to serve three-year terms. Upon the recommendation of the Nominating Committee, the board has nominated Messrs. Mawhinney, McKinley and Multani for election to the Board for a three-year term, in the event Subproposal 1(b) is not approved.

Each nominee has consented to being named in this proxy statement and has agreed to serve if elected. If a nominee is unable to stand for election, the Board may either reduce the number of directors to be elected or select a substitute nominee. If a substitute nominee is selected, the proxy holders will vote your shares for the substitute nominee, unless you have withheld authority.

The affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting is required to elect the director-nominees as directors. This means that the nominees will be elected if they receive more affirmative votes than any other person.

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR-NOMINEES.

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD

 

PROPOSAL 3 – APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF

THE 2015 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN

General

Our stockholders are being asked to approve an amendment and restatement of the Incentive Award Plan. The proposed amended and restated Incentive Award Plan is referred to herein as the “Restated Plan.” The Board approved the Restated Plan on March 21, 2017, subject to stockholder approval. The Restated Plan will become effective immediately upon stockholder approval at the Annual Meeting. If the Restated Plan is not approved by our stockholders, the Restated Plan will not become effective, the existing Incentive Award Plan will continue in full force and effect, and we may continue to grant awards under the Incentive Award Plan, subject to its terms, conditions and limitations, using the shares available for issuance thereunder.

We strongly believe that an employee equity compensation program is a necessary and powerful incentive and retention tool that benefits all stockholders. The Incentive Award Plan was first adopted by the Board and approved by our stockholders in June 2015 in connection with our initial public offering. As of March 31, 2017, a total of [6,434,126] shares of our common stock were reserved under the Incentive Award Plan, the aggregate number of shares of common stock subject to stock options under the Incentive Award Plan was [6,289,766], no awards other than stock options were outstanding under the Incentive Award Plan and a total of [144,360] shares of common stock remained available under the Incentive Award Plan for future awards.

Overview of Proposed Amendments

Increase in Available Shares and Change to Automatic Refresh.  As of March 31, 2017, a total of [6,434,126] shares of our common stock were reserved under the Incentive Award Plan, with a total of [144,360] shares remaining available for future awards. The Incentive Award Plan contains an “automatic refresh”  provision that allows for an annual increase in the number of shares available for issuance under the Incentive Award Plan on January 1 of each year during the ten-year term of the Incentive Award Plan, with the first increase occurring on January 1, 2016 and the final increase occurring on January 1, 2025. The annual increase in the number of shares is currently equal to the least of:

The automatic increase pursuant to the refresh provision of the Incentive Award Plan on each of January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2017 was 1,876,722 shares and these increases are included in the total number of shares available for issuance under the Incentive Award Plan as of March 31, 2017, set forth above.

The Restated Plan will increase the number of shares available for issuance under the Incentive Award Plan by 800,000, such that a total of 7,234,126 shares will be reserved for issuance under the Restated Plan, with [944,360] shares initially available for future awards. The Restated Plan will also amend the automatic refresh provision of the Incentive Award Plan such that, commencing on January 1, 2018, and on each January 1  thereafter ending on and including January 1, 2021, the aggregate number of shares available for issuance under the Restated Plan will be increased by a number of shares equal to the lesser of:

Unless the Restated Plan is authorized and approved by our stockholders, we believe the number of shares available for issuance under the Incentive Award Plan will be insufficient to effectively achieve the Incentive Award Plan’s purpose as a powerful incentive and retention tool for employees, directors and consultants that benefits all of our stockholders. We expect the Restated Plan will enable us to continue our policy of equity ownership by employees, directors and consultants as an incentive to contribute to our success. Without sufficient equity awards to effectively

attract, motivate and retain employees, we could be forced to consider cash replacement alternatives to provide a market-competitive total compensation package necessary to attract, retain and motivate the individual talent critical to the future success of the Company. These cash replacement alternatives would then reduce the cash available for other important purposes, such as enhancing our operating infrastructure, supporting our business growth, responding to business challenges or opportunities, developing new applications and services, enhancing our existing solution and services and potentially acquiring complementary businesses and technologies.

No Repricings or Exchanges without Stockholder Approval. The Restated Plan amends the Incentive Award Plan to require the Company, except with respect to adjustments permitted under the Restated Plan in connection with corporate transactions, to obtain stockholder approval prior to (a) reducing the exercise price of any stock option or stock appreciation right (“SAR”) awarded under the Restated Plan or (b) cancelling a stock option or SAR at a time when its exercise price or base appreciation amount exceeds the fair market value of the underlying shares in exchange for cash or another stock option, SAR, restricted stock or other award.

Stockholder Approval Under Section 162(m) of the Code. Our stockholders are being asked to approve the Restated Plan to satisfy the stockholder approval requirements of Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and to approve the material terms of the performance goals for awards that may be granted under the Restated Plan as required under Section 162(m). In general, Section 162(m) places a limit on the deductibility for federal income tax purposes of the compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer or any of our other “named executive officers,” as the term is used in SEC rules (other than our Chief Financial Officer if he or she is a named executive officer by virtue of his or her role as our principal financial officer). Under Section 162(m), compensation paid to such persons in excess of $1 million in a taxable year generally is not deductible. However, compensation that qualifies as performance-based under Section 162(m) does not count against the $1 million deduction limitation. One of the requirements of performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) is that the material terms of the plan under which compensation may be paid be disclosed to and approved by our public stockholders. For purposes of Section 162(m), the material terms include (1) the employees eligible to receive compensation, (2) a description of the business criteria on which the performance goals may be based and (3) the maximum amount of compensation that can be paid to an employee under the performance goals.

The Restated Plan includes a description of the business criteria on which the performance goals may be based and amends the Incentive Award Plan to provide that (1) the maximum aggregate number of shares of our common stock with respect to which one or more awards of options or SARs may be granted under the Restated Plan to any one person during any fiscal year is 1,000,000 shares, (2) the maximum aggregate number of shares of our common stock with respect to which one or more awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) or other stock or cash based awards that are denominated in shares intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) may be granted under the Restated Plan to any one person during any fiscal year is 1,000,000 shares and (3) the maximum amount of cash that may be paid to any one person during any fiscal year with respect to one or more awards under the Restated Plan, payable in cash and not denominated in shares, is $5,000,000. The foregoing share numbers may be adjusted to take into account equity restructurings and certain other corporate transactions.

Stockholder approval of this Proposal 3 is intended to constitute approval of the material terms of the Restated Plan for purposes of the stockholder approval requirements of Section 162(m). However, stockholder approval of the Restated Plan is only one of several requirements under Section 162(m) that must be satisfied for amounts realized under the Restated Plan to qualify for the performance-based compensation exemption under Section 162(m). Submission of the material terms of the Restated Plan performance goals for stockholder approval should not be viewed as a guarantee that we will be able to deduct all compensation under the Restated Plan, but will permit us to seek to structure incentive compensation to meet the performance-based compensation requirements if we choose to do so. Nothing in this proposal precludes us or the plan administrator from making any payment or granting awards that do not qualify for tax deductibility under Section 162(m).

The Restated Plan is not being amended in any material respect other than to reflect the changes described above.

Equity Incentive Award Information

The table below presents information about the number of shares that were subject to outstanding equity awards under the Incentive Award Plan and the shares remaining available for issuance under the Incentive Award Plan, each at March 31,  2017.

We also maintain the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which is a plan intended to qualify under Section 423 of the Code, and the Inducement Plan, which allows us to issue awards to a new employee or to a rehired employee following a bona fide period of interruption of employment if the award is a material inducement to the employee’s entering into employment with the Company or any subsidiary. In addition, as of March 31, 2017, [171] employees and [three] directors held outstanding stock options granted under our Second Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the “Prior Plan”). We ceased granting awards under the Prior Plan when the Incentive Award Plan became effective. Additional information regarding the Prior Plan, the Inducement Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan is provided under “Equity Compensation Plan Information” elsewhere in this proxy statement.

Factors the Board Considered

In determining whether to approve the Restated Plan, the Board considered the following:

In light of the factors described above, and the fact that the ability to continue to grant equity compensation is vital to our ability to continue to attract and retain employees in the extremely competitive labor markets in which we compete, the Board has determined that approval of the Restated Plan is reasonable and appropriate at this time. The Board will not create a subcommittee to evaluate the risk and benefits for issuing shares under the Restated Plan.

Stockholder Approval Requirement

Stockholder approval of the Restated Plan is necessary in order for us to (1) meet the stockholder approval requirements of the NYSE and (2) be able to take tax deductions without regard to the deduction limits of Section 162(m) for certain compensation resulting from awards intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m).

Specifically, approval of the Restated Plan will constitute approval of the material terms of the Restated Plan pursuant to the stockholder approval requirements of Section 162(m), as discussed above, which is intended to enable (but not require) us to award performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) under the Restated Plan, thereby preserving the deductibility of these awards for federal income tax purposes without regard to the deduction limits of Section 162(m). In addition, to the extent required under the Code, approval of the Restated Plan will constitute approval pursuant to the stockholder approval requirements of Section 422 of the Code relating to incentive stock options (“ISOs”).

If the Restated Plan is not approved by our stockholders, the Restated Plan will not become effective, the existing Incentive Award Plan will continue in full force and effect, and we may continue to grant awards under the Incentive Award Plan, subject to its terms, conditions and limitations, using the shares available for issuance thereunder.

Summary of the Restated Plan

The principal features of the Restated Plan are summarized below, but the summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Restated Plan itself, which is attached as Appendix B to this proxy statement.

Purpose

The purpose of the Restated Plan is to enhance our ability to attract, retain and motivate persons who make (or are expected to make) important contributions to the Company by providing these individuals with equity ownership opportunities. We believe that the Restated Plan is essential to our success. Equity awards are intended to motivate high levels of performance and align the interests of our directors, employees and consultants with those of our stockholders by giving directors, employees and consultants the perspective of an owner with an equity stake in the Company and providing a means of recognizing their contributions to our success. The Board and management believe that equity awards are necessary to remain competitive in our industry and are essential to recruiting and retaining the highly qualified employees who help the Company meet its goals.

Eligibility and Administration

Our employees, consultants and directors, and the employees, consultants and directors of our subsidiaries, will be eligible to receive awards under the Restated Plan, but only employees may be granted ISOs. As of March 31, 2016, there were [11] non-employee directors, [five] consultants and [720] employees who would have been eligible for awards under the Restated Plan.

The Restated Plan will be administered by the Board, which may delegate its duties and responsibilities to committees of our directors or officers (referred to collectively as the “plan administrator” below), subject to certain limitations that may be imposed under applicable laws, including Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and stock exchange rules, as applicable. The plan administrator will have the authority to make all determinations and interpretations under, prescribe all forms for use with, and adopt rules for the administration of, the Restated Plan, subject to its express terms and conditions. The plan administrator will also have the authority to determine which eligible service providers receive awards, grant awards and set the terms and conditions of all awards under the Restated Plan, including any vesting and vesting acceleration provisions, subject to the conditions and limitations in the Restated Plan.

Shares Available for Awards

A total of 7,234,126 shares of our common stock will be authorized for issuance under the Restated Plan. In addition, commencing on January 1, 2018 and on each January 1  thereafter ending on and including January 1, 2021, the aggregate number of shares available for issuance under the Restated Plan will be increased by that number of shares of our common stock equal to the lesser of:

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the number of shares of stock that may be issued pursuant to ISOs under the Restated Plan may not exceed an aggregate of 25,000,000 shares. All of the foregoing share numbers may be adjusted for changes in our capitalization and certain corporate transactions, as described below under the heading “Certain Transactions.” We intend to register the shares reserved for issuance under the Restated Plan on a Form S‑8.

If an award under the Restated Plan expires, lapses or is terminated, exchanged for cash, surrendered, repurchased, canceled without having been fully exercised or forfeited, any unused shares subject to the award will again be available for new grants under the Restated Plan. However, the Restated Plan does not allow the shares available for grant under the Restated Plan to be recharged or replenished with shares that:

Awards granted under the Restated Plan in substitution for any options or other stock or stock-based awards granted by an entity before the entity’s merger or consolidation with us (or any of our subsidiaries) or our (or any subsidiary’s) acquisition of the entity’s property or stock will not reduce the shares available for grant under the Restated Plan, but will count against the maximum number of shares that may be issued upon the exercise of ISOs.

Individual Award Limits

The maximum aggregate number of shares of our common stock with respect to which one or more awards of options or SARs may be granted under the Restated Plan to any one person during any fiscal year is 1,000,000 shares, and the maximum aggregate number of shares of our common stock with respect to which one or more awards of restricted stock, RSUs or other stock or cash based awards that are denominated in shares and are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) may be granted under the Restated Plan to any one person during any fiscal year is 1,000,000 shares. However, these numbers may be adjusted to take into account equity restructurings and certain other corporate transactions as described below. The maximum amount of cash that may be paid to any one person during any fiscal year with respect to one or more awards under the Restated Plan, payable in cash and not denominated in shares, is $5,000,000.

Provisions of the Restated Plan Relating to Director Compensation

The Restated Plan provides that the plan administrator may establish compensation for non-employee directors from time to time subject to the Restated Plan’s limitations. The Board or its authorized committee may modify non-employee director compensation from time to time in the exercise of its business judgment, taking into account factors, circumstances and considerations as it deems relevant from time to time, provided that the sum of any cash or other compensation and the grant date fair value of any equity awards granted as compensation for services as a non-employee director may not exceed $650,000 during any fiscal year. The plan administrator may make exceptions to this limit for individual non-employee directors in extraordinary circumstances, as the plan administrator may determine in its discretion, provided that the non-employee director receiving such additional compensation may not participate in the decision to award such compensation or in other contemporaneous compensation decisions involving non-employee directors.

Awards

The Restated Plan provides for the grant of stock options, including ISOs, and non-qualified stock options (“NSOs”),  SARs, restricted stock, RSUs, performance awards and other stock or cash based awards. Certain awards under the Restated Plan may constitute or provide for a deferral of compensation, subject to Section 409A of the Code, which may impose additional requirements on the terms and conditions of such awards. All awards under the Restated Plan will be set forth in award agreements, which will detail the terms and conditions of the awards, including any applicable vesting and payment terms and post-termination exercise limitations. Awards other than cash awards generally will be settled in shares of our common stock, but the plan administrator may provide for cash settlement of any award. A brief description of each award type follows.

Performance-Based Awards

The plan administrator will determine whether specific performance awards are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) and will have discretion to pay compensation that does not qualify as performance-based compensation and that is not tax deductible. Under Section 162(m), a “covered employee” is our Chief Executive Officer or any of our other “named executive officers,” as the term is used in SEC rules (other than our Chief Financial Officer if he or she is a named executive officer by virtue of his or her role as our principal financial officer). Section 162(m) imposes a $1 million cap on the compensation deduction that we may take in respect of compensation paid to covered employees; however, compensation that qualifies as performance-based compensation is excluded from the calculation of the $1 million cap.

In order to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), in addition to certain other requirements, the relevant amounts must be payable only upon the attainment of pre-established, objective performance goals set by the plan administrator and based on stockholder-approved performance criteria. In asking our stockholders to approve the Restated Plan, we are also requesting our stockholders approve the below performance criteria to allow us to qualify awards as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m).

For purposes of the Restated Plan, one or more of the following performance criteria will be used in setting performance goals applicable to performance-based compensation intended to qualify under Section 162(m), either for the entire company or a subsidiary, division, business unit or an individual, and may be used in setting performance goals applicable to other stock or cash based awards: net earnings or losses (either before or after one or more of interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and non-cash equity-based compensation expense); gross or net sales or revenue or sales or revenue growth; net income (either before or after taxes) or adjusted net income; profits (including but not limited to gross profits, net profits, profit growth, net operation profit or economic profit), profit return ratios or operating margin; budget or operating earnings (either before or after taxes or before or after allocation of corporate overhead and bonus); cash flow (including operating cash flow and free cash flow or cash flow return on capital); return on assets; return on capital or invested capital; cost of capital; return on stockholders’ equity; total stockholder return; return on sales; costs, reductions in costs and cost control measures; expenses; working capital; earnings or loss per share; adjusted earnings or loss per share; price per share or dividends per share (or appreciation in or maintenance of such price or dividends); regulatory achievements or compliance; implementation, completion or attainment of objectives relating to research, development, regulatory, commercial or strategic milestones or developments; market share; economic value or economic value added models; division, group or corporate financial goals; individual business objectives; production or growth in production; reserves or added reserves; growth in reserves per share; inventory

growth; environmental, health and/or safety performance; effectiveness of hedging programs; improvements in internal controls and policies and procedures; customer satisfaction/growth; customer service; employee satisfaction; recruitment and maintenance of personnel; human resources management; supervision of litigation and other legal matters; strategic partnerships and transactions; financial ratios (including those measuring liquidity, activity, profitability or leverage); debt levels or reductions; sales-related goals; financing and other capital raising transactions; cash on hand; acquisition activity; investment sourcing activity; and marketing initiatives, any of which may be measured in absolute terms or as compared to any incremental increase or decrease. Such performance goals also may be based solely by reference to the Company’s performance or the performance of a subsidiary, division, business segment or business unit of the company or a subsidiary, or based upon performance relative to performance of other companies or upon comparisons of any of the indicators of performance relative to performance of other companies. When determining performance goals, the plan administrator may provide for exclusion of the impact of an event or occurrence which the plan administrator determines should appropriately be excluded, including, without limitation, non-recurring charges or events, acquisitions or divestitures, changes in the corporate or capital structure, events unrelated to the business or outside of the control of management, foreign exchange considerations, and legal, regulatory, tax or accounting changes.

Prohibition on Repricing

Under the Restated Plan, the plan administrator may not, except in connection with equity restructurings and certain other corporate transactions as described below, without the approval of our stockholders, authorize the repricing of any outstanding option or SAR to reduce its price per share, or cancel any option or SAR in exchange for cash or another award when the price per share exceeds the “fair market value” (as that term is defined in the Restated Plan) of an underlying share.

Certain Transactions

In connection with certain corporate transactions and events affecting our common stock, including a change in control, or change in any applicable laws or accounting principles, the plan administrator has broad discretion to take action under the Restated Plan to prevent the dilution or enlargement of intended benefits, facilitate the transaction or event or give effect to the change in applicable laws or accounting principles. This includes canceling awards for cash or property, accelerating the vesting of awards, providing for the assumption or substitution of awards by a successor entity, adjusting the number and type of shares subject to outstanding awards and/or with respect to which awards may be granted under the Restated Plan and replacing or terminating awards under the Restated Plan. In addition, in the event of certain non-reciprocal transactions with our stockholders, the plan administrator will make equitable adjustments to the Restated Plan and outstanding awards as it deems appropriate to reflect the transaction.

Foreign Participants, Claw-Back Provisions, Transferability and Participant Payments

The plan administrator may modify awards granted to participants who are foreign nationals or employed outside the United States or establish subplans or procedures to address differences in laws, rules, regulations or customs of such foreign jurisdictions. All awards will be subject to any company claw-back policy as set forth in such claw-back policy or the applicable award agreement. Except as the plan administrator may determine or provide in an award agreement, awards under the Restated Plan are generally non-transferrable, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, or, subject to the plan administrator’s consent, pursuant to a domestic relations order, and are generally exercisable only by the participant. With regard to tax withholding obligations arising in connection with awards under the Restated Plan, and exercise price obligations arising in connection with the exercise of stock options under the Restated Plan, the plan administrator may, in its discretion, accept cash, wire transfer or check, shares of common stock that meet specified conditions, a promissory note, a “market sell order,” such other consideration as the plan administrator deems suitable or any combination of the foregoing.

Plan Amendment and Termination

The Board may amend or terminate the Restated Plan at any time; however, no amendment, other than an amendment that increases the number of shares available under the Restated Plan, may materially and adversely affect an award outstanding under the Restated Plan without the consent of the affected participant and stockholder approval will be obtained for any amendment to the extent necessary to comply with applicable laws. The Restated Plan will

remain in effect until the tenth anniversary of the earlier of (i) the date the Board first adopted the Incentive Award Plan and (ii) the date our stockholders first approved the Incentive Award Plan, unless earlier terminated by the Board. No awards may be granted under the Restated Plan after its termination.

Federal Income Tax Consequences Associated with the Restated Plan

The federal income tax consequences of the Restated Plan under current federal income tax law are summarized in the following discussion, which deals with the general tax principles applicable to the Restated Plan and is intended for general information only. The following discussion of federal income tax consequences does not purport to be a complete analysis of all of the potential tax effects of the Restated Plan. It is based upon laws, regulations, rulings and decisions now in effect, all of which are subject to change. Foreign, state and local tax laws, and employment, estate and gift tax considerations are not discussed, and may vary depending on individual circumstances and from locality to locality.

Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. A Restated Plan participant generally will not recognize taxable income and we generally will not be entitled to a tax deduction upon the grant of a stock option or SAR. The tax consequences of exercising a stock option and the subsequent disposition of the shares received upon exercise will depend upon whether the option qualifies as an “incentive stock option” as defined in Section 422 of the Code. The Restated Plan permits the grant of options that are intended to qualify as ISOs, as well as options that are not intended to so qualify; however, ISOs may be granted only to our employees and employees of our parent or subsidiary corporations, if any. Upon exercising an option that does not qualify as an ISO when the fair market value of our stock is higher than the exercise price of the option, a Restated Plan participant generally will recognize taxable income at ordinary income tax rates equal to the excess of the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise over the purchase price, and we (or our subsidiaries, if any) generally will be entitled to a corresponding tax deduction for compensation expense, in the amount equal to the amount by which the fair market value of the shares purchased exceeds the purchase price for the shares. Upon a subsequent sale or other disposition of the option shares, the participant will recognize a short-term or long-term capital gain or loss in the amount of the difference between the sales price of the shares and the participant’s tax basis in the shares.

Upon exercising an ISO, a Restated Plan participant generally will not recognize taxable income, and we will not be entitled to a tax deduction for compensation expense. However, upon exercise, the amount by which the fair market value of the shares purchased exceeds the purchase price will be an item of adjustment for alternative minimum tax purposes. The participant will recognize taxable income upon a sale or other taxable disposition of the option shares. For federal income tax purposes, dispositions are divided into two categories: qualifying and disqualifying. A qualifying disposition generally occurs if the sale or other disposition is made more than two years after the date the option was granted and more than one year after the date the shares are transferred upon exercise. If the sale or disposition occurs before these two periods are satisfied, then a disqualifying disposition generally will result.

Upon a qualifying disposition of ISO shares, the participant will recognize long-term capital gain in an amount equal to the excess of the amount realized upon the sale or other disposition of the shares over their purchase price. If there is a disqualifying disposition of the shares, then the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date (or, if less, the price at which the shares are sold) over their purchase price will be taxable as ordinary income to the participant. If there is a disqualifying disposition in the same year of exercise, it eliminates the item of adjustment for alternative minimum tax purposes. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon the disposition will be recognized as a capital gain or loss by the participant.

We will not be entitled to any tax deduction if the participant makes a qualifying disposition of ISO shares. If the participant makes a disqualifying disposition of the shares, we should be entitled to a tax deduction for compensation expense in the amount of the ordinary income recognized by the participant.

Upon exercising or settling a SAR, a Restated Plan participant will recognize taxable income at ordinary income tax rates, and we should be entitled to a corresponding tax deduction for compensation expense, in the amount paid or value of the shares issued upon exercise or settlement. Payments in shares will be valued at the fair market value of the shares at the time of the payment, and upon the subsequent disposition of the shares the participant will recognize

a  short-term or long-term capital gain or loss in the amount of the difference between the sales price of the shares and the participant’s tax basis in the shares.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. A Restated Plan participant generally will not recognize taxable income at ordinary income tax rates and we generally will not be entitled to a tax deduction upon the grant of restricted stock or RSUs. Upon the termination of restrictions on restricted stock or the payment of RSUs, the participant will recognize taxable income at ordinary income tax rates, and we should be entitled to a corresponding tax deduction for compensation expense, in the amount paid to the participant or the amount by which the then fair market value of the shares received by the participant exceeds the amount, if any, paid for them. Upon the subsequent disposition of any shares, the participant will recognize a short-term or long-term capital gain or loss in the amount of the difference between the sales price of the shares and the participant’s tax basis in the shares. However, a Restated Plan participant granted restricted stock that is subject to forfeiture or repurchase through a vesting schedule such that it is subject to a “risk of forfeiture” (as defined in Section 83 of the Code) may make an election under Section 83(b) of the Code to recognize taxable income at ordinary income tax rates, at the time of the grant, in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the date of grant, less the amount paid, if any, for such shares. We should be entitled to a corresponding tax deduction for compensation, in the amount recognized as taxable income by the participant. If a timely Section 83(b) election is made, the participant will not recognize any additional ordinary income on the termination of restrictions on restricted stock, and we will not be entitled to any additional tax deduction.

Dividend Equivalents, Stock Payment Awards and Cash-Based Awards. A Restated Plan participant generally will not recognize taxable income and we will not be entitled to a tax deduction upon the grant of dividend equivalents, stock payment awards or cash-based awards until cash or shares are paid or distributed to the participant. At that time, any cash payments or the fair market value of shares that the participant receives will be taxable to the participant at ordinary income tax rates and we should be entitled to a corresponding tax deduction for compensation expense. Payments in shares will be valued at the fair market value of the shares at the time of the payment, and upon the subsequent disposition of the shares, the participant will recognize a short-term or long-term capital gain or loss in the amount of the difference between the sales price of the shares and the participant’s tax basis in the shares.

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Certain types of awards under the Restated Plan may constitute, or provide for, a deferral of compensation under Section 409A of the Code. Unless certain requirements set forth in Section 409A of the Code are complied with, holders of such awards may be taxed earlier than would otherwise be the case (e.g., at the time of vesting instead of the time of payment) and may be subject to an additional 20% federal income tax (and, potentially, certain interest penalties). To the extent applicable, the Restated Plan and awards granted under the Restated Plan will generally be structured and interpreted in a manner intended to comply with Section 409A of the Code and the Department of Treasury regulations and other interpretive guidance that may be issued pursuant to Section 409A of the Code.

Section 162(m) Limitation.  In general, under Section 162(m), income tax deductions of publicly held corporations may be limited to the extent total compensation (including base salary, annual bonus, stock option exercises and non-qualified benefits paid) for certain executive officers exceeds $1 million (less the amount of any “excess parachute payments” as defined in Section 280G of the Code) in any one year. However, under Section 162(m), the deduction limit does not apply to certain performance-based compensation if an independent compensation committee determines performance goals, the material terms of the performance-based compensation are disclosed to and approved by our stockholders and other requirements of Section 162(m) are met. In general, stock options and SARs should satisfy the performance-based compensation exception if the awards are made by a qualifying compensation committee, the plan sets the maximum number of shares that can be granted to any person within a specified period and the compensation is based solely on an increase in the stock price after the grant date. Specifically, the option exercise price must be equal to or greater than the fair market value of the stock subject to the award on the grant date. Rights or awards granted under the Restated Plan, other than options and SARs, will not qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) unless such rights or awards are granted or vest upon pre-established objective performance goals, the material terms of which are disclosed to and approved by our stockholders and other requirements under Section 162(m) are met. We have attempted to structure the Restated Plan in a manner that will allow us to grant compensation under the Restated Plan that meets the requirements of qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) and will not be subject to the $1 million limitation. We have not, however, requested a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or an opinion of counsel regarding this issue.

Excess Parachute Payments. Section 280G of the Code limits the deduction that the employer may take for otherwise deductible compensation payable to certain individuals if the compensation constitutes an “excess parachute payment.” Excess parachute payments arise from payments made to disqualified individuals that are in the nature of compensation and are contingent on changes in ownership or control of the employer or certain affiliates. Accelerated vesting or payment of awards under the Restated Plan upon a change in ownership or control of the employer or its affiliates could result in excess parachute payments. In addition to the deduction limitation applicable to the employer, a disqualified individual receiving an excess parachute payment is subject to a 20% excise tax on the amount thereof.

State and local tax consequences may in some cases differ from the federal tax consequences. The foregoing summary of the income tax consequences in respect of the Restated Plan is for general information only. Interested parties should consult their own advisors as to specific tax consequences of their awards.

The Restated Plan is not subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and is not intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code.

Plan Benefits

Awards under the Restated Plan are subject to the discretion of the plan administrator and, other than awards that will be made automatically under our non-employee director compensation program if the program is not amended, no determinations have been made by the plan administrator as to any future awards that may be granted pursuant to the Restated Plan. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the benefits that will be received in the future by participants in the Restated Plan. The following table sets forth, with respect to the individuals and groups identified therein, information regarding stock options awarded under the Incentive Award Plan through March 31, 2017:

 

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of a majority in voting power of the votes cast affirmatively or negatively (excluding abstentions) at the meeting by the holders entitled to vote thereon is required to approve the amendment and restatement of the Incentive Award Plan.

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF OUR 2015 INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN.

PROPOSAL 4 – RATIFYING THE APPOINTMENT OF

THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accountants retained to audit the Company’s financial statements. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP to be Teladoc’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2017 and has unanimously approved and voted to recommend that the stockholders ratify such appointment.

Ernst & Young LLP audited Teladoc’s annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016. In determining whether to reappoint the independent registered public accountants, the Audit Committee considers the length of time the firm has been engaged, the quality of the discussions with the independent registered public accountants and its annual assessment of the past performance of both the lead audit partner and Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee is responsible for the negotiation of audit fees associated with the Company’s retention of Ernst & Young LLP. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the meeting to respond to appropriate questions and to make a statement if they so desire.

Vote Required For Ratification

The Audit Committee is responsible for selecting Teladoc’s independent registered public accounting firm and neither our Certificate nor our Bylaws require approval or ratification of such selection by our stockholders. The Board believes, however, that submitting the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to the stockholders for ratification is a matter of good corporate governance. If the stockholders do not ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select a different public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Ratifying the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Teladoc’s independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority in voting power of the votes cast affirmatively or negatively (excluding abstentions) at the meeting by the holders entitled to vote thereon.

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” RATIFYING THE APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the amount of Teladoc common stock beneficially owned by each director or director-nominee, each named executive officer included in the 2016 Summary Compensation Table on page 47, and all directors, director-nominees and executive officers as a group as of March 31, 2017. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with applicable rules of the SEC. Unless otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership is direct and the person indicated has sole voting and investment power.

The address of each individual named in the table below is c/o Teladoc, Inc., 2 Manhattanville Road, Suite 203, Purchase, New York 10577.

*Represents less than 1% of the outstanding common stock.

Significant Stockholders

The following table lists certain persons known by Teladoc to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Teladoc common stock as of March 31, 2017. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with applicable rules of the SEC. Except as set forth below, and to the best knowledge of Teladoc, no other person (or persons acting in concert) owns beneficially more than 5% of Teladoc’s common stock.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires directors and certain officers of Teladoc and persons who own more than 10% of Teladoc common stock to file with the SEC initial reports of beneficial ownership (Form 3) and reports of

subsequent changes in their beneficial ownership (Form 4 or Form 5) of Teladoc’s common stock. Such directors, officers and greater-than‑10% stockholders are required to furnish Teladoc with copies of the Section 16(a) reports they file. The SEC has established specific due dates for these reports, and Teladoc is required to disclose in this proxy statement any late filings or failures to file.

Based solely upon a review of the copies of the Section 16(a) reports (and any amendments thereto) furnished to Teladoc and written representations from certain reporting persons that no additional reports were required, Teladoc believes that its directors, reporting officers and greater-than‑10% stockholders complied with all these filing requirements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, except for a  Form 4 filed on September 12, 2016 reporting Mr. James Outland’s exercise of options representing 897 shares of common stock in July 2015, which was delinquent due to an administrative error.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Except for Mr. Gorevic, who serves as (and is nominated to continue as) a Teladoc director, set forth below is biographical information about each of our executive officers. For biographical information on Mr. Gorevic, see page 24 of this proxy statement.

Mr. Gabriel R. Cappucci, 54

Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

Mr. Cappucci became our Senior Vice President, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer in May 2015. Prior to joining Teladoc, Mr. Cappucci had a nearly 20‑year career at Medco Health Solutions, Inc. where he held a variety of finance roles, including SVP & Controller, Chief Accounting Officer. Most recently, he was Chief Financial Officer of Enclara Pharmacia, a privately held company providing hospice pharmacy services. Mr. Cappucci began his professional career with KPMG LLP where he was a Senior Manager. He is a graduate of Boston College’s Carroll School of Management. Mr. Cappucci is a Certified Public Accountant and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

Mr. Mark Hirschhorn, 52

Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Hirschhorn became our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in October 2012, and took on the additional role of being our Chief Operating Officer in September 2016. Mr. Hirschhorn is an experienced senior financial and operations executive who has worked with numerous entrepreneurial ventures in a variety of different market segments. From April 2004 to October 2012, Mr. Hirschhorn served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of RCS/Media Monitors, an international software technology company that serves the media and entertainment markets. From 2000 to 2003, Mr. Hirschhorn served as the Chief Financial Officer in a number of technology companies, including BT Radianz. From 1996 to 2000, he spent five years as the Vice President and Global Controller of RSL Communications, a publicly traded multinational telecommunications company, and as Chief Financial Officer of Deltathree Communications, a publicly traded RSL subsidiary and pioneer in VOIP technology. He started his professional career with Deloitte and spent nine years with the firm. Mr. Hirschhorn earned a B.A. from Rutgers University and an M.B.A. from Rutgers Business School. Mr. Hirschhorn is a CPA and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

Mr. Michael King, 53

Chief Sales Officer

Mr. King became our Chief Sales Officer in July 2010. Prior to joining Teladoc, Mr. King held various positions at Healthways, Inc., beginning in 2001, and was most recently Senior Vice President of Insight and Innovations after serving as Senior Vice President of Sales. During his tenure, he was responsible for the creation, implementation, and execution of all sales business plans. In addition to sales operation, he also directed consultant relationship management, product marketing, and messaging. Prior to his time with Healthways, Mr. King held various positions at CareSteps.com, WellPath Community Health Plans, Doctors Health Plan and Aetna. Mr. King earned a B.S. in Employment Relations and Management from Michigan State University and attended the General Managers program at Harvard Business School.

Mr. Peter N. Nieves, 49

Executive Vice President and Chief Revenue Officer

Mr. Nieves became our Executive Vice President and Chief Revenue Officer in March 2017. Prior to joining Teladoc, beginning in 2013, Mr. Nieves was Executive Vice President – Employer Market for Optum, part of UnitedHealth Group. At Optum, Mr. Nieves was responsible for national client management and new business development teams serving large account and middle-market employer business, including the Government, Education and Labor sectors. He was accountable for market strategy development, client solution planning and overall profitable growth of the Employer business, which generated in excess of $1 billion of annual revenue. For more than ten years prior to that, he held various leadership roles with Mercer. Mr. Nieves holds a B.B.A. degree from Iona College.

Mr. Adam C. Vandervoort, 42

Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

Mr. Vandervoort joined Teladoc in February 2015. For more than five years prior to that, he was Corporate Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Independence Holding Company, a publicly traded insurance holding company. Mr. Vandervoort is licensed to practice law in the states of California, Connecticut and New York. He holds a J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania Law School and A.M. and A.B. degrees from the University of Chicago.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Teladoc is an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, and has elected to comply with the reduced disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies under the JOBS Act.

Compensation Overview

This compensation discussion, which should be read together with the compensation tables set forth below, provides information regarding our executive compensation program for our “named executive officers” for 2016, who were: Mr. Jason Gorevic, President and Chief Executive Officer; Mr. Mark Hirschhorn, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer; and Mr. Michael King, Chief Sales Officer.

Our executive compensation program is administered by the Compensation Committee in consultation with the Board. The primary objectives of our executive compensation program are to retain key executives, attract new talent and link compensation achievement to business objectives.

A key objective of our compensation program is to allow us to retain and, as needed, attract qualified executives. We believe that our ability to keep our senior executive team intact is tied to our compensation programs. Additionally, for us to be appropriately positioned to attract new talent as needed, we must be prepared to be, and be perceived as, an employer that offers competitive compensation.

Elements of Compensation

Base Salary

The Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of our executive officers, including our named executive officers, from time to time and makes adjustments as it determines to be reasonable and necessary to reflect the scope of an executive officer’s performance, contributions, responsibilities, experience, prior salary level, position (in the case of a promotion) and market conditions.

The following table shows the annual base salaries of our named executive officers for 2016 and 2017. All annual base salary increases were effective January 1  (for 2016) and March 15 (for 2017), except that Mr. Hirschhorn’s annual base salary increased from $345,050 to $370,000 in connection with his promotion from Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer to Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, effective September 19, 2016.

 

Annual Cash Bonuses

We also believe that a significant portion of our named executive officers’ cash compensation should be based on the attainment of business goals established by the Board. The Incentive Award Plan allows the Board (and the Compensation Committee) to make formula-based cash incentive payments to each of our named executive officers based upon the achievement of established corporate goals. The Board and Compensation Committee retain discretion to adjust annual cash incentive payments based on such factors as they determine relevant for a given year.

For 2016, the Compensation Committee established goals for our executive cash incentive program based on a mix of: (i) corporate performance, measured against targets for revenue (60%), earnings (20%), member satisfaction (10%) and visit volume (10%); and (ii) individually assigned goals. For 2016, Mr. Gorevic’s target bonus was 100% of his base salary, based on corporate performance alone, and Mr. Hirschhorn’s target bonus was 65% of his base salary,  based 65% on corporate performance and 35% on individual performance against goals relating to his areas of responsibility within the Company.  Mr. King’s bonus for 2016 was determined based on a mix of corporate performance (paid annually), revenue retention (paid annually) and new revenues (paid quarterly) pursuant to the terms of his

employment agreement and his target annual bonus amount for 2016 upon at least 100% attainment of the corporate performance, revenue retention and new revenues goal was $27,500, $37,500 and $150,000, respectively. For calendar years 2017 and beyond, Mr. King’s target bonus will be determined by the Board and he will be eligible to earn an additional bonus based upon the attainment of “stretch” or “enhanced” performance objectives, which will be determined by the Board at the beginning of the year.

In February 2017, the Compensation Committee reviewed our performance against our 2016 objectives and determined that our achievement of corporate performance was 80%, representing the weighted average of achievement levels of 90% for revenue, 0% for earnings, 131% for member satisfaction and 125% for visit volume.  The Compensation Committee then considered whether any discretionary adjustments to the annual cash incentives were appropriate and, following this review, elected to pay our named executive officers under our 2016 annual cash bonus program the amounts set forth in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the 2016 Summary Compensation Table below.

Equity-Based Compensation

Equity-based compensation provides employees a common interest with our investors to increase the value of our common stock. We have historically granted equity awards to our employees, including our named executive officers, in the form of stock options to purchase shares of our common stock, though our Incentive Award Plan contemplates additional types of equity-based awards. Our stock options typically have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, as determined by Board, and vest as to 25% of the underlying shares on the first anniversary of the date of grant and in equal monthly installments over the following 36 months, subject to the holder’s continued employment with us. From time to time, the Board may also construct alternate vesting schedules as it determines are appropriate to motivate particular employees.

Our stock options may be intended to qualify as ISOs under applicable provisions of the Code. Stock options granted to our named executive officers may be subject to accelerated vesting in certain circumstances, as described below in the section titled “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers.”

We awarded stock options to our named executive officers during 2016 in the following amounts:

Retirement, Health, Welfare and Additional Benefits

Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in our employee benefit plans and programs, including medical and dental benefits, flexible spending accounts and short- and long-term disability and life insurance, to the same extent as our other full time employees, subject to the terms and eligibility requirements of those plans, except that we pay the full cost of the healthcare coverage for our named executive officers. We also sponsor a 401(k) defined contribution plan in which our named executive officers may participate, subject to limits imposed by the Code, to the same extent as our other full-time employees. Currently, we match 100% of contributions made by participants in the 401(k) plan up to 4% of eligible annual compensation. All matching contributions are fully vested when made.

Employment Agreements and Potential Payments to Named Executive Officers

Jason Gorevic

Our employment agreement with Mr. Gorevic is for an unspecified term and entitles him to an annual target bonus opportunity of 100% of his annual base salary. In addition, Mr. Gorevic is eligible to earn a potential bonus for over-performance of at least 150% of his annual base salary.

In the event Mr. Gorevic is terminated by us without cause or he resigns for good reason, subject to his timely executing a release of claims in our favor, he is entitled to receive: (i) 18 months of continued base salary and life insurance; (ii) up to 18 months of continued medical, dental or vision coverage pursuant to COBRA, if elected; (iii) a  pro rata portion of the bonus he would have earned for the year of termination; and (iv) accelerated vesting of time-based equity awards scheduled to vest within 12 months following the date of termination and continued eligibility to vest in awards subject to performance-based vesting conditions if and to the extent such performance conditions are satisfied during that 12‑month period. If the termination occurs within 12 months following a change in control, subject to his timely executing a release of claims in our favor, Mr. Gorevic is entitled to receive the following in lieu of the severance benefits described in the previous sentence: (i) a lump-sum payment equal to 150% of his base salary plus target bonus opportunity; (ii) 18 months of continued life insurance; (iii) up to 18 months of continued medical, dental or vision coverage pursuant to COBRA, if elected; (iv) a  pro rata portion of the bonus he would have earned for the year of termination; and (v) accelerated vesting of his time-based equity awards and continued eligibility to vest in awards subject to performance-based vesting conditions if and to the extent such performance conditions are thereafter satisfied.

Mr. Gorevic’s employment agreement contains restrictive covenants pursuant to which Mr. Gorevic has agreed to refrain from competing with us or soliciting our employees or customers for a period of 18 months following his termination of employment, provided that Mr. Gorevic may perform services for competitors with multiple lines of business if he (i) does not participate in any material respect in the competing business and, (ii) if multiple lines of business report to Mr. Gorevic, any competing business lines account for less than 15% of the net revenue over the prior year for the business lines reporting to him.

For purposes of Mr. Gorevic’s employment agreement:

Mark Hirschhorn and Michael King

Our employment agreements with Messrs. Hirschhorn and King are for unspecified terms. Mr. Hirschhorn is entitled to an annual target bonus opportunity in an amount determined by the Board or the Compensation Committee in its discretion. Mr. King was entitled to an annual bonus opportunity based on certain corporate, new business and net dollar retention goals for 2016, and an annual target bonus opportunity of 75% of his annual base salary thereafter. Mr. King is also entitled to receive an additional bonus in excess of his target bonus upon the attainment of certain “stretch” or “enhanced” performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee.

In the event either of Messrs. Hirschhorn or King is terminated by us without cause or he resigns for good reason, subject to his timely executing a release of claims in our favor, he is entitled to receive: (i) 12 months of continued base salary and life insurance; (ii) up to 12 months of continued medical, dental or vision coverage pursuant to COBRA, if elected; and (iii) accelerated vesting of time-based equity awards scheduled to vest within six months following the date of termination and continued eligibility to vest in awards subject to performance-based vesting conditions if and to the extent such performance conditions are satisfied during that six-month period. If either of Messrs. Hirschhorn’s or King’s termination occurs within 12 months following a change in control, subject to his timely executing a release of claims in our favor, he is entitled to receive the following in lieu of the severance benefits described in the previous sentence: (i) a lump-sum payment equal to his base salary plus target bonus opportunity; (ii) 12 months of continued life insurance; (iii) up to 12 months of continued medical, dental or vision coverage pursuant to COBRA, if elected; (iv) a  pro rata portion of the bonus he would have earned for the year of termination; and (v) accelerated vesting of his time-based equity awards and continued eligibility to vest in awards subject to performance-based vesting conditions if and to the extent such performance conditions are thereafter satisfied.

The employment agreements contain restrictive covenants pursuant to which each of Mr. Hirschhorn and Mr. King has agreed to refrain from competing with us or soliciting our employees or customers following his termination of employment for a period of 12 months.

For purposes of the employment agreements, “cause” has the same meaning as in Mr. Gorevic’s employment agreement.

“Good reason” generally means, with respect to Mr. King, subject to certain notice requirements and cure rights, (i) a material reduction in the aggregate amount of his base salary and target bonus without his consent (except for a reduction applicable to the management team generally); (ii) a material reduction in his overall responsibilities or authority, or scope of duties, except following a change in control in certain circumstances; (iii) a requirement that he relocate his principal place of employment outside of the New York City metropolitan area; or (iv) our material breach of the employment agreement.

“Good reason” generally means, with respect to Mr. Hirschhorn, subject to certain notice requirements and cure rights, (i) a material reduction in the aggregate amount of his base salary (except for a reduction applicable to the management team generally); (ii) a material reduction in his overall responsibilities or authority, or scope of duties; (iii) a requirement that he relocate his principal place of employment outside of the New York City metropolitan area; or (iv) our material breach of the employment agreement. Any change or action or inaction incident to a future separation of the roles of Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer in which Mr. Hirschhorn retains either such title and attendant responsibilities does not constitute “Good reason” for purposes of his employment agreement.

In December 2016, we entered into an amendment to Mr. Hirschhorn’s employment agreement that provided for, among other things, the vesting of all outstanding unvested Teladoc equity-based awards to be suspended during the period commencing on January 1, 2017 and ending on January 1, 2018 (the “Relevant Period”) such that (a) no equity awards will vest during the Relevant Period and (b) following the Relevant Period, equity awards will be eligible to vest on the same schedule (and subject to the same conditions) that otherwise would have applied to such equity awards absent the amendment, except that each applicable equity award’s vesting date shall (subject to the conditions of the equity awards, including, without limitation, any requirement for Mr. Hirschhorn’s continued employment or service through the modified vesting date) be the first anniversary of the vesting date that otherwise would have applied absent the amendment.

 

2016 Summary Compensation Table

The following table lists the annual compensation for Teladoc’s President and Chief Executive Officer and two other most-highly compensated executive officers during each of 2016 and 2015.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2016 Fiscal Year-End