UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One) | ||
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2018 | ||
or | ||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from to | ||
Commission file number 1-4304
Commercial Metals Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 75-0725338 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
6565 North MacArthur Blvd, Irving, TX (Address of principal executive offices) | 75039 (Zip Code) | |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (214) 689-4300
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class | Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered | |
Common Stock, $0.01 par value | New York Stock Exchange | |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | |
Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |
Emerging growth company o | ||
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the Company's common stock on February 28, 2018 held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on the closing price per share on February 28, 2018 on the New York Stock Exchange was approximately $2.8 billion.
As of October 23, 2018, 117,025,790 shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the following document are incorporated by reference into the listed Part of Form 10-K:
Registrant's definitive proxy statement for the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders — Part III
1
COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (hereinafter referred to as the "Annual Report") contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors. For a discussion of important factors that could cause our results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements, please refer to Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" and Part II, Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this Annual Report.
GENERAL
Commercial Metals Company ("CMC") together with its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company," "we," "our" or "us") manufactures, recycles and markets steel and metal products, related materials and services through a network of facilities that includes four electric arc furnace ("EAF") mini mills, two EAF micro mills, a rerolling mill, steel fabrication and processing plants, construction-related product warehouses, and metal recycling facilities in the United States ("U.S.") and Poland.
We were incorporated in 1946 in the state of Delaware. Our predecessor company, a metals recycling business, has existed since 1915. We maintain our corporate office at 6565 North MacArthur Boulevard in Irving, Texas, 75039, telephone number (214) 689-4300. Our fiscal year ends August 31st, and any reference in this Annual Report to any year refers to the fiscal year ended August 31st of that year, unless otherwise noted.
We have four reportable segments: Americas Recycling, Americas Mills, Americas Fabrication and International Mill. Financial information for the last three fiscal years concerning our segments is incorporated herein by reference from Note 21, Business Segments, which is contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to these reports are made available free of charge through the Investors section of our website, http://www.cmc.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The information contained on our website or available by hyperlink from our website is not incorporated into this Annual Report or other documents we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.
AMERICAS RECYCLING
Our Americas Recycling segment processes scrap metals for use as a raw material by manufacturers of new metal products. This segment operates 34 scrap metal processing facilities, with 14 locations in Texas, five locations in each of Florida and South Carolina, two locations in each of Georgia, Missouri, and North Carolina, and one location in each of Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Tennessee.
We purchase ferrous and nonferrous metals, processed and unprocessed, from a variety of sources in a variety of forms. Sources of metal for processing include manufacturing and industrial plants, metal fabrication plants, electric utilities, machine shops, factories, railroads, refineries, shipyards, ordinance depots, demolition businesses, automobile salvage firms, wrecking firms, small scrap metal collection firms and retail individuals.
Our scrap metal processing facilities typically consist of an office and warehouse building located on several acres of land that we use for receiving, sorting, processing and storing metals. These facilities utilize specialized equipment for processing both ferrous and nonferrous metal, and one of our facilities has extensive equipment that segregates metallic content from large quantities of insulated wire. Our larger scrap metal processing facilities utilize various equipment, such as scales, shears, baling presses, briquetting machines, conveyors, magnetic separators, presses, and shredders, which enable these facilities to efficiently process large volumes of scrap metals. We use cranes to handle scrap metals for processing and to load material for shipment. We transport processed scrap to customers, including our mills, by rail, truck - utilizing a fleet of trucks that we own or lease, as well as private haulers - and barge.
3
Americas Recycling operates five large shredding machines, two in Texas and one in each of Florida, Oklahoma, and South Carolina capable of pulverizing obsolete automobiles or other sources of scrap metal. We have three additional shredders, two operated by our Americas Mills segment and one operated by our International Mill segment. With the exception of precious metals, our U.S. scrap metal processing facilities recycle and process practically all types of metal.
We sell scrap metals to steel mills and foundries, aluminum sheet and ingot manufacturers, brass and bronze ingot makers, copper refineries and mills, secondary lead smelters, specialty steel mills, high temperature alloy manufacturers and other consumers. Ferrous metal is the primary raw material for EAFs, such as those operated by our Americas Mills and International Mill segments. Our Irving, Texas office coordinates the sale of substantially all scrap metals from our metal processing facilities.
Our recycling business competes with other scrap metal processors and primary nonferrous metal producers, both in the U.S. and internationally, for sales of nonferrous materials. Consumers of nonferrous metals frequently utilize primary or "virgin" ingot processed by mining companies instead of nonferrous metals. The prices of nonferrous metals are closely related to, but generally are less than, the prices of primary or "virgin" ingot.
One customer represented approximately 15% of our Americas Recycling segment's net sales in fiscal 2018, and one customer represented 11% of this segment's net sales in fiscal 2017. No customers represented 10% or more of our Americas Recycling segment's net sales in fiscal 2016.
AMERICAS MILLS
Our Americas Mills segment includes our three EAF mini mills, two EAF micro mills, a rerolling mill, two scrap metal shredders, eight scrap metal processing facilities that directly support the mills, and a railroad salvage operation, all of which are based in the U.S.
Our three EAF mini mills, located in Alabama, South Carolina and Texas, our two EAF micro mills, located in Arizona and Oklahoma, and our rerolling mill, located in Arkansas, produce one or more of steel reinforcing bar ("rebar"), angles, flats, rounds, channels, fence post sections and other shapes. Our mills ship to a broad range of customers across all regions of the U.S. We utilize a fleet of trucks that we own or lease as well as private haulers and railcar to transport finished products. To minimize the cost of our products, to the extent feasibly consistent with market conditions and working capital demands, we prefer to operate our facilities at or near full capacity. Market conditions such as increases in quantities of competing imported steel, production rates at U.S. competitors, customer inventory levels or a decrease in non-residential construction activity may reduce demand for our products and limit our ability to operate at full capacity. Through operations and capital improvements, we strive to increase productivity, capacity and product mix at our mills. To remain competitive we regularly make substantial capital expenditures. Over the past three fiscal years, we invested approximately $404.1 million, or 74%, of total capital expenditures in our Americas Mills segment.
The following table presents the amount of steel melted, rolled and shipped by our six steel mills.
Short tons (in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Melted | 2,922 | 2,603 | 2,522 | ||||||
Rolled | 2,673 | 2,476 | 2,382 | ||||||
Shipped | 3,013 | 2,725 | 2,630 | ||||||
Descriptions of mill capacity, particularly rolling capacity, are highly dependent on the specific product mix manufactured. Our mills roll many different types and sizes of products in their range depending on market conditions, including pricing and demand. Our estimated annual capacity for finished goods of approximately 3.4 million short tons assumes a typical product mix and will vary with the products we produce.
4
Our EAF mini mills each consist of:
• | a melt shop with an electric arc furnace; |
• | continuous casting equipment that shapes molten metal into billets; |
• | a reheating furnace that prepares billets for rolling; |
• | a rolling mill that forms products from heated billets; |
• | a mechanical cooling bed that receives hot products from the rolling mill; |
• | finishing facilities that cut, straighten, bundle and prepare products for shipping; and |
• | supporting facilities such as maintenance, warehouse and office areas. |
Our Alabama mini mill primarily manufactures products that are larger in size relative to products manufactured by our other steel mini mills. These larger size products include mid-size structural steel products such as equal and unequal leg angles, channels and flats. This mini mill does not produce rebar. Our Alabama mini mill sells primarily to service centers and original equipment manufacturers; however, it also sells to customers in the construction, manufacturing and fabricating industries.
Our South Carolina mini mill manufactures a full line of bar-sized products, including rebar, corrosion-resistant rebar, angles, channels, flats, rounds, squares, and fence post sections. Our South Carolina mini mill sells primarily to customers in the fabrication industry; however, it also sells to service centers, manufacturers of original equipment, and the agricultural industry. In addition to the mini mill, we operate a steel fence post plant on the same site.
Our Texas mini mill manufactures a full line of bar-sized products, including rebar, corrosion-resistant rebar, angles, rounds, channels, flats, and other sections. This mini mill sells primarily to the fabrication, construction, energy and petrochemical industries; however, it also sells to service centers and manufacturers of original equipment. In addition to the mini mill, we operate a rebar fabrication facility, a shredder and downstream sorting equipment located on the same site.
Our micro mill in Arizona utilizes unique continuous process technology where metal flows uninterrupted from melting to casting to rolling. It is more compact than existing, larger capacity steel mini mills, and production is dedicated to a limited product range. This micro mill primarily produces rebar; however, it also manufactures fence post sections and is capable of producing other merchant sections. Our Arizona micro mill sells primarily to customers in the construction and fabrication industries, although it also sells to service centers. We operate a rebar fabrication facility located on the same site as the micro mill.
During 2018, we commissioned our new micro mill in Durant, Oklahoma. This micro mill utilizes the continuous process technology pioneered at our Arizona micro mill and, similarly, is more compact than existing, larger capacity steel mini mills, and production is dedicated to a limited product range. This micro mill primarily produces rebar and is uniquely equipped to produce spooled rebar. Additionally, our Oklahoma micro mill produces fence post sections to supply our automated post shop that is on the same site as the micro mill. Our Oklahoma micro mill sells primarily to customers in the construction and fabrication industries.
The primary raw material that our Alabama, Arizona, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas mills use is ferrous scrap metal. This segment operates eight metal processing facilities that directly support the mills: two in each of Alabama and South Carolina, and four in Texas. This segment also includes two shredders. We believe the supply of ferrous metal is adequate to meet our future needs, but it has historically been subject to significant price fluctuations which have occurred more rapidly over the last several years. All five of these mills consume large amounts of electricity and natural gas. We have not had any significant curtailments, and we believe that energy supplies are adequate. The supply and demand of regional and national energy and the extent of applicable regulatory oversight of rates charged by providers affect the prices we pay for electricity and natural gas.
Our smaller Arkansas rerolling mill primarily manufactures bed frame angles, t-stock, earth bar, and other specialty flat, angle and square shapes. This mill consists of a reheating furnace, rolling mill, cooling bed, finishing equipment and support facilities similar to, but on a smaller scale than, those at our other mills. This mill utilizes billets acquired either from our mills or unrelated suppliers or used rail, primarily salvaged from railroad abandonments. Our Arkansas rerolling mill primarily sells to customers in the construction and manufacturing industries. Since our Arkansas rerolling mill does not have melting facilities, the rerolling mill depends on an adequate supply of competitively priced billets or used rail.
Due to the nature of certain stock products we sell in the Americas Mills segment, we do not have a long lead time between order receipt and delivery. We generally fill orders for stock products from inventory or with products near completion. As a result, we do not believe that backlog, defined as the total value of unfulfilled orders, is a significant factor in the evaluation of these operations. Backlog at August 31, 2018 was approximately $326.4 million, compared to $224.4 million at August 31, 2017.
No customers represented 10% or more of our Americas Mills segment's net sales in fiscal 2018. One customer represented approximately 10% and 11% of our Americas Mills segment's net sales in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.
5
AMERICAS FABRICATION
Our Americas Fabrication segment consists of our steel fabrication facilities that bend, weld, cut and fabricate steel, primarily rebar, and produce steel fence posts; warehouses that sell or rent products for the installation of concrete; and facilities that heat-treat steel to strengthen and provide flexibility.
Steel Fabrication
Through our Americas Fabrication segment we operate 38 facilities engaged in the various aspects of steel fabrication. Most of the facilities engage in general fabrication of reinforcing steel, with four facilities fabricating only steel fence posts, including our new post shop in Durant, Oklahoma. We obtain steel for these facilities from our mills and third-party vendors.
We conduct steel fabrication activities at 12 locations in Texas, three locations in California, two locations in each of Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, South Carolina, and Virginia, and one location in each of Arizona, Hawaii, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah.
Fabricated steel products are used primarily in the construction of commercial and non-commercial buildings, hospitals, convention centers, industrial plants, power plants, highways, bridges, arenas, stadiums, and dams. Generally, we sell fabricated steel in response to a competitive bid solicitation from a construction contractor or a project owner. Typically, the contractor or project owner does not negotiate with the bidders individually.
Backlog in our steel fabrication operations was approximately $679.3 million at August 31, 2018, compared to $627.8 million at August 31, 2017. We do not consider other backlogs in the Americas Fabrication segment to be material.
Construction Services
Our Construction Services business unit sells and rents construction-related products and equipment to concrete installers and other businesses in the construction industry. We have 17 locations in Texas, six in Louisiana and one in Oklahoma where we store, sell and rent these construction-related products, which, with the exception of a small portion of steel products, are purchased from third-party suppliers.
Impact Metals
We provide heat-treated steel products through CMC Impact Metals, a subsidiary of CMC. CMC Impact Metals is one of North America's premier producers of high strength steel products. We operate facilities in Alabama and Pennsylvania, which manufacture high strength bar for the truck trailer industry, special bar quality steel for the energy market and armor plate for military vehicles. CMC Impact Metals works closely with our Alabama mini mill and other steel mills that sell specialized heat-treated steel for customer specific use.
No single customer accounted for 10% or more of our Americas Fabrication segment's net sales in fiscal 2018, 2017 or 2016.
INTERNATIONAL MILL
Our International Mill segment is comprised of our mini mill, recycling and fabrication operations located in Poland. Our subsidiary, CMC Poland Sp. z.o.o. ("CMCP"), operates an EAF mini mill in Zawiercie, Poland. Our Poland EAF mini mill operates equipment similar to the equipment operated by our U.S. EAF mini mills. This segment's operations are conducted through: two rolling mills that produce primarily rebar and high quality merchant products; a specialty rod finishing mill; 12 scrap processing facilities, which includes a large capacity scrap metal shredding facility similar to the largest shredder we operate in the U.S.; and four steel fabrication facilities primarily for rebar and wire mesh.
Our Poland mini mill operates a flexible rolling mill designed to allow efficient and flexible production of a range of medium section merchant bar products. This rolling mill complements the facility's other rolling mill dedicated primarily to rebar production. Either rolling mill can feed an alternative finishing end designed to produce high grade wire rod. Our Poland mini mill has annual rolling capacity of approximately 1.3 million short tons.
Our Poland mini mill is a significant manufacturer of rebar, merchant bar and wire rod in Central Europe, selling primarily to fabricators, manufacturers, distributors and construction companies. The majority of sales are to customers within Poland. However, the Poland mini mill also exports to the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Slovakia and other countries. Ferrous metal, the
6
principal raw material used by our Poland mini mill, electricity, natural gas and other necessary raw materials for the steel manufacturing process are generally readily available, although they can be subject to significant price fluctuations.
Our fabrication operations in Poland have expanded downstream captive uses for a portion of the rebar and wire rod manufactured at the Poland mini mill. We conduct rebar fabrication activities in Zawiercie, Żyrardów and Rzeszów, Poland. These three rebar fabrication facilities are similar to those operated by our U.S. fabrication facilities and sell fabricated rebar primarily to contractors for incorporation into construction projects. In addition to fabricated rebar, these facilities sell fabricated mesh, assembled rebar cages and other rebar by-products.
Additionally, we operate a fabrication facility in Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland that produces welded steel mesh, cold rolled wire rod and cold rolled rebar. This operation supplements sales of fabricated rebar by offering wire mesh to customers, which include metals service centers and construction contractors. We maintain a presence in the Polish fabrication market, but we also export to neighboring countries such as the Czech Republic, Germany and Slovakia.
Backlog in our Poland fabrication operations was approximately $53.5 million at August 31, 2018 compared to $48.3 million at August 31, 2017. Our Poland mini mill generally fills orders for stock products from inventory or with products near completion. As a result, we do not believe that backlog levels are a significant factor in the evaluation of this operation. No single customer represented 10% or more of our International Mill segment's net sales in fiscal 2018, 2017 or 2016.
SEASONALITY
Many of our mills and fabrication facilities serve customers in the construction industry. Due to the increase in construction during the spring and summer months, our net sales are generally higher in the third and fourth quarters of our fiscal year than in the first and second quarters.
COMPETITION
The nonferrous recycling industry is fragmented in the U.S. However, we believe our Americas Recycling segment is one of the largest entities engaged in the recycling of nonferrous metals in the U.S. We are also a major regional processor of ferrous metal. The metal processing business is subject to cyclical fluctuations based upon the availability and price of unprocessed scrap metal and the demand for steel and nonferrous metals. In our Americas Recycling segment, we compete primarily on price and on the services we provide to scrap suppliers and generators. The price offered for scrap metal is the principal competitive factor in acquiring material from smaller scrap metals collection firms. Industrial generators of scrap metal may also consider factors other than price, such as supplying appropriate collection containers, timely removal, reliable documentation including accurate and detailed purchase records with customized reports, the ability to service multiple locations, insurance coverage, and the buyer's financial strength.
Our Americas Mills segment competes with regional, national and international manufacturers of steel. We produce a significant percentage of the total domestic output of rebar and merchant bar. We do not produce a significant percentage of the total U.S. output of our other products. We compete primarily on the services we provide to our customers and on the price and quality of our products. See "Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Industry" below.
Our Americas Fabrication segment competes with regional and national suppliers. We believe that we are among the largest fabricators of rebar in the U.S. We also believe that we are the largest manufacturer of steel fence posts in the U.S. We compete primarily on price, although we also compete based on the value added services we provide to our customers, our speed of delivery, ability to service large projects, and technical capability.
Our International Mill segment competes with several large manufacturers of rebar and wire rod in Central and Eastern Europe, primarily on the basis of price, quality, delivery times and product availability. We believe we are the largest producer of merchant bars for the products we produce and the second largest producer of rebar and wire rod in Poland.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
A significant factor in our business is our compliance with environmental laws and regulations. See Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Industry" in this Annual Report. Compliance with and changes in various environmental requirements and environmental risks applicable to our industry may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Occasionally, we may be required to clean up or take remediation action with regard to sites we operate or formerly operated. We may also be required to pay for a portion of the cleanup or remediation cost at sites we never owned or at sites which we never
7
operated, if we are found to have arranged for treatment or disposal of hazardous substances on the sites. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA" or "Superfund") and analogous state statutes, we could be responsible for both the costs of cleanup as well as for associated natural resource damages. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), or equivalent state agency, has named us as a potentially responsible party ("PRP") at several federal Superfund sites or similar state sites. In some cases, these agencies allege that we are one of many PRPs responsible for the cleanup of a site because we sold scrap metals to or otherwise disposed of materials at the site. With respect to the sale of scrap metals, we contend that an arm's length sale of valuable scrap metal for use as a raw material in a manufacturing process that we do not control should not constitute "an arrangement for disposal or treatment of hazardous substances" as defined under federal law. In 2000, the Superfund Recycling Equity Act was signed into law which, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, provides legitimate sellers of scrap metal for recycling with some relief from Superfund liability under federal law. Despite Congress' clarification of the intent of the federal law, some state laws and environmental agencies still seek to impose such liability. We believe efforts to impose such liability are contrary to public policy objectives and legislation encouraging recycling and promoting the use of recycled materials, and we continue to support clarification of state laws and regulations consistent with Congress' action.
New federal, state and local laws, regulations and the varying interpretations of such laws by regulatory agencies and the judiciary impact how much money we spend on environmental compliance. In addition, uncertainty regarding adequate control levels, testing and sampling procedures, new pollution control technology and cost benefit analysis based on market conditions impact our future expenditures in order to comply with environmental requirements. We cannot predict the total amount of capital expenditures or increases in operating costs or other expenses that may be required as a result of environmental compliance. We also do not know if we can pass such costs on to our customers through product price increases. During fiscal 2018, we incurred environmental costs including disposal, permits, license fees, tests, studies, remediation, consultant fees and environmental personnel expense of $32.0 million. In addition, during fiscal 2018, we spent approximately $7.5 million on capital expenditures for environmental projects. We believe that our facilities are in material compliance with currently applicable environmental laws and regulations. We anticipate capital expenditures for new environmental control facilities during fiscal 2019 to be approximately $4.7 million.
EMPLOYEES
As of August 31, 2018, the Company employed the following numbers of employees in each reportable segment and Corporate:
Segment | Number of Employees | ||
Americas Recycling | 1,304 | ||
Americas Mills | 1,932 | ||
Americas Fabrication | 3,282 | ||
International Mill | 2,014 | ||
Corporate & Other | 368 | ||
Total | 8,900 | ||
Certain of our employees belong to unions for collective bargaining purposes, including (i) employees at one metal processing facility in our Americas Recycling segment, (ii) employees at five fabrication facilities in our Americas Fabrication segment, and (iii) approximately 37% of the employees in our International Mill segment. We believe that our labor relations are generally good to excellent and that our work force is highly motivated.
8
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Our Board of Directors typically elects officers at its first meeting after our annual meeting of stockholders. Our executive officers continue to serve for terms set from time to time by our Board of Directors in its discretion. The table below sets forth the name, current position and offices, age and period served for each of our executive officers.
EXECUTIVE | ||||||
NAME | CURRENT POSITION & OFFICES | AGE | OFFICER SINCE | |||
Barbara R. Smith | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer | 59 | 2011 | |||
Adam R. Hickey | Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer | 43 | 2012 | |||
Paul K. Kirkpatrick | Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | 47 | 2013 | |||
Paul J. Lawrence | Vice President of Finance | 48 | 2016 | |||
Mary A. Lindsey | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 63 | 2016 | |||
Tracy L. Porter | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | 61 | 2010 | |||
Barbara R. Smith joined the Company in May 2011 as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Smith was appointed Chief Operating Officer in January 2016, President and Chief Operating Officer in January 2017 and President and Chief Executive Officer in September 2017. She was appointed to our Board of Directors on September 1, 2017 and was named Chairman of the Board of Directors on January 11, 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Smith served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation, a mini mill steel producer, from July 2007 to May 2011, after joining Gerdau Ameristeel as Treasurer in July 2006. From February 2005 to July 2006, she served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FARO Technologies, Inc., a developer and manufacturer of 3-D measurement and imaging systems. From 1981 to 2005, Ms. Smith was employed by Alcoa Inc., a producer of primary aluminum, fabricated aluminum and alumina, where she held various financial leadership positions, including Vice President of Finance for Alcoa's Aerospace, Automotive & Commercial Transportation Group, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Alcoa Fujikura Ltd. and Director of Internal Audit.
Adam R. Hickey joined the Company in February 2004 as a Senior Accountant at our corporate headquarters. From October 2006 to April 2012, Mr. Hickey held various financial leadership roles of increasing responsibility in the Americas operations, most recently as the Controller of the CMC Americas division. In April 2012, Mr. Hickey was appointed Vice President and Controller of the Company and in January 2017, was named Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. From September 1998 to January 2004, Mr. Hickey worked in the assurance practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers in Dallas, Texas.
Paul K. Kirkpatrick joined the Company in December 2009 as Assistant General Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary. He was appointed Vice President, Corporate Secretary and Assistant General Counsel in February 2013 and Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in October 2013. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Kirkpatrick was an attorney at Haynes and Boone, LLP, a law firm based in Dallas, Texas.
Paul J. Lawrence joined the Company in February 2016 as Vice President of Finance. He was appointed Vice President of Finance and Treasurer in September 2016; Treasurer, Vice President of Financial Planning and Analysis in January 2017; and Vice President of Finance in June 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Lawrence served as North American Information Technology Leader of Gerdau Long Steel North America, a U.S. steel producer, from 2014 to 2016, and from 2010 to 2014, he served as Gerdau Template Deployment Leader at Gerdau Long Steel North America. From 2003 to 2010, Mr. Lawrence held a variety of financial roles at Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation, including Assistant Vice President and Corporate Controller, and Deputy Corporate Controller. From 1998 to 2002, Mr. Lawrence held several financial positions with Co-Steel Inc., which was acquired by Gerdau SA.
Mary A. Lindsey joined the Company in September 2009 as Vice President-Tax. She was appointed Vice President-Tax and Investor Relations in June 2015, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in January 2016 and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in September 2017. Prior to joining CMC, Ms. Lindsey served as Vice President Tax and Tax Counsel for Albany International Corp., a global advanced textiles and materials processing company, from March 2006 to September 2009, and from January 2005 to March 2006, Ms. Lindsey was an attorney at Baker & Hostetler LLP, a national law firm. In addition, Ms. Lindsey served in various roles, including Vice President Tax and Tax Counsel, Legal Counsel responsible for global M&A and intellectual property, and General Manager of Corporate M&A, at The Timken Company, a global manufacturer of bearings, transmissions, gearboxes, and related components, from January 1985 to January 2005.
Tracy L. Porter joined the Company in 1991 and has held various positions within the Company, including General Manager of CMC Steel Arkansas at Magnolia, Arkansas, head of the Company's Rebar Fabrication Division, and Interim President of CMC
9
Americas Division. Mr. Porter served as Vice President of the Company and President of CMC Americas Division from April 2010 to July 2010. Mr. Porter was appointed Senior Vice President of the Company and President of CMC Americas Division in July 2010, Executive Vice President, CMC Operations in September 2016, and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in April 2018.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There are inherent risks and uncertainties associated with our business that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Set forth below are descriptions of those risks and uncertainties that we currently believe to be material, but the risks and uncertainties described below are not the only risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDUSTRY
Our industry and the industries we serve are vulnerable to global economic conditions.
Metals industries and commodity products have historically been vulnerable to significant declines in consumption, global overcapacity and depressed product pricing during prolonged periods of economic downturn. Our business supports cyclical industries such as commercial, government and residential construction, energy, metals service center, petrochemical and original equipment manufacturing. We may experience significant fluctuations in demand for our products from these industries based on global or regional economic conditions, energy prices, consumer demand and decisions by governments to fund infrastructure projects such as highways, schools, energy plants and airports. Although the residential housing market is not a significant direct factor in our business, related commercial and infrastructure construction activities, such as shopping centers, schools and roads, could be adversely impacted by a prolonged slump in new housing construction. Our business, results of operations and financial condition are adversely affected when the industries we serve suffer a prolonged downturn or anemic growth. Because we do not have unlimited backlogs, our business, results of operations and financial condition are promptly affected by short-term economic fluctuations.
Although we believe that the long-term prospects for the steel industry remain bright, we are unable to predict the duration of current economic conditions that are contributing to current demand for our products compared to pre-recession levels. Future economic downturns or a prolonged period of slow growth or economic stagnation could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are vulnerable to the economic conditions in the regions in which our operations are concentrated.
Our geographic concentration in the southern and southwestern U.S. as well as Central Europe exposes us to the local market conditions in these regions. Economic downturns in these areas or decisions by governments that have an impact on the level and pace of overall economic activity in one of these regions could adversely affect demand for our products and, consequently, our sales and profitability. As a result, our financial results are substantially dependent upon the overall economic conditions in these areas.
Rapid and significant changes in the price of metals could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Prices for most metals in which we deal have experienced increased volatility over the last several years, and such increased price volatility impacts us in several ways. Some of our operations, such as our fabrication operations, may benefit from rapidly decreasing steel prices as their material cost for previously contracted fixed price work declines. Others, such as our Americas Mills and International Mill segments, would likely experience reduced margins and may be forced to liquidate high cost inventory at reduced margins or losses until prices stabilize. Sudden increases could have the opposite effect in each case. Overall, we believe that rapid substantial price changes are not to our industry's benefit. Our customer and supplier base would be impacted due to uncertainty as to future prices. A reluctance to purchase inventory in the face of extreme price decreases or to sell quickly during a period of rapid price increases would likely reduce our volume of business. Marginal industry participants or speculators may attempt to participate to an unhealthy extent during a period of rapid price escalation with a substantial risk of contract default if prices suddenly reverse. Risks of default in contract performance by customers or suppliers as well as an increased risk of bad debts and customer credit exposure could increase during periods of rapid and substantial price changes.
10
Excess capacity and over-production by foreign producers in our industry could increase the level of steel imports into the U.S., resulting in lower domestic prices, which would adversely affect our sales, margins and profitability.
Global steel-making capacity exceeds demand for steel products in some regions around the world. Rather than reducing employment by rationalizing capacity with consumption, steel manufacturers in these countries (often with local government assistance or subsidies in various forms) have traditionally periodically exported steel at prices significantly below their home market prices, which prices may not reflect their costs of production or capital. For example, steel production in China, the world's largest producer and consumer of steel, has continued to exceed Chinese demand. This rising excess capacity in China has resulted in a further increase in imports of artificially low-priced steel and steel products to the U.S. and world steel markets. A continuation of this trend or a significant decrease in China's rate of economic expansion could result in increasing steel imports from China. Excessive imports of steel into the U.S. have exerted, and may continue to exert, downward pressure on U.S. steel prices, which negatively affects our ability to increase our sales, margins, and profitability. The excess capacity may create downward pressure on our steel prices and lead to reduced sales volumes as imports absorb market share that would otherwise be filled by domestic supply, all of which would adversely affect our sales, margins and profitability and could subject us to possible renegotiation of contracts or increases in bad debt.
We believe the downward pressure on, and periodically depressed levels of, U.S. steel prices in some recent years have been further exacerbated by imports of steel involving dumping and subsidy abuses by foreign steel producers. While some tariffs and quotas are periodically put into effect for certain steel products imported from a number of countries that have been found to have been unfairly pricing steel imports to the U.S., there is no assurance that tariffs and quotas will always be levied, even if otherwise justified, and even when imposed many of these are short-lived or ineffective.
On March 8, 2018, President Trump signed a proclamation imposing a 25% tariff on all imported steel products for an indefinite period of time under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. The tariff will be imposed on all steel imports with the exception of steel imported from Canada, Mexico and Australia, and the administration is considering exemption requests from other countries. We expect that this tariff, while in effect, will discourage some steel imports from non-exempt countries. However, we do not yet have sufficient information to evaluate in detail the possible impact of this tariff on our operations or results. When this or other tariffs or duties expire or if others are further relaxed or repealed, or if relatively higher U.S. steel prices make it attractive for foreign steelmakers to export their steel products to the U.S., despite the presence of duties or tariffs, the resurgence of substantial imports of foreign steel could create downward pressure on U.S. steel prices.
Excess capacity has also led to greater protectionism as is evident in raw material and finished product border tariffs put in place by China, Brazil and other countries. Such protectionism could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Compliance with and changes in environmental compliance requirements and remediation requirements could result in substantially increased capital requirements and operating costs; violations of environmental requirements could result in costs that have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Existing environmental laws or regulations, as currently interpreted or reinterpreted in the future, and future laws and regulations, may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations is a significant factor in our business. We are subject to local, state, federal and international environmental laws and regulations concerning, among other matters, waste disposal, air emissions, waste and storm water effluent and disposal and employee health. Federal and state regulatory agencies can impose administrative, civil and criminal penalties and may seek injunctive relief impacting continuing operations for non-compliance with environmental requirements.
New facilities that we may build, especially steel mills, like the micro mill we built in Durant, Oklahoma, are required to obtain several environmental permits before significant construction or commencement of operations. Delays in obtaining permits or unanticipated conditions in such permits could delay the project or increase construction costs or operating expenses. Our manufacturing and recycling operations produce significant amounts of by-products, some of which are handled as industrial waste or hazardous waste. For example, our EAF mills generate electric arc furnace dust ("EAF dust"), which the EPA and other regulatory authorities classify as hazardous waste. EAF dust and other industrial waste and hazardous waste require special handling, recycling or disposal.
In addition, the primary feed materials for the shredders operated by our scrap metal recycling facilities are automobile hulks and obsolete household appliances. Approximately 20% of the weight of an automobile hull consists of unrecyclable material known as shredder fluff. After the segregation of ferrous and saleable nonferrous metals, shredder fluff remains. We, along with others in the recycling industry, interpret federal regulations to require shredder fluff to meet certain criteria and pass a toxic leaching test to avoid classification as a hazardous waste. We also endeavor to remove hazardous contaminants from the feed material prior
11
to shredding. As a result, we believe the shredder fluff we generate is not normally considered or properly classified as hazardous waste. If the laws, regulations or testing methods change with regard to EAF dust or shredder fluff or other by-products, we may incur additional significant costs.
Changes to National Ambient Air Quality Standards ("NAAQS") or other requirements on our air emissions could make it more difficult to obtain new permits or to modify existing permits and could require changes to our operations or emissions control equipment. Such difficulties and changes could result in operational delays and capital and ongoing compliance expenditures.
Legal requirements are changing frequently and are subject to interpretation. New laws, regulations and changing interpretations by regulatory authorities, together with uncertainty regarding adequate pollution control levels, testing and sampling procedures, new pollution control technology and cost/benefit analysis based on market conditions are all factors that may increase our future expenditures to comply with environmental requirements. Accordingly, we are unable to predict the ultimate cost of future compliance with these requirements or their effect on our operations. We cannot predict whether such costs would be able to be passed on to customers through product price increases. Competitors in various regions or countries where environmental regulation is less restrictive, subject to different interpretation or generally not enforced, may enjoy a competitive advantage.
We may also be required to conduct additional cleanup (and pay for associated natural resource damages) at sites where we have already participated in remediation efforts or take remediation action with regard to sites formerly used in connection with our operations. We may be required to pay for a portion or all of the costs of cleanup or remediation at sites we never owned or on which we never operated if we are found to have arranged for treatment or disposal of hazardous substances on the sites. In cases of joint and several liability, we may be obligated to pay a disproportionate share of cleanup costs if other responsible parties are financially insolvent.
We are involved, and may in the future become involved, in various environmental matters that may result in fines, penalties or judgments being assessed against us or liability imposed upon us which we cannot presently estimate or reasonably foresee and which may have a material impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Under CERCLA or similar state statutes, we may have obligations to conduct investigation and remediation activities associated with alleged releases of hazardous substances or to reimburse the EPA (or state agencies as applicable) for such activities and to pay for natural resource damages associated with alleged releases. We have been named a PRP at several federal and state Superfund sites because the EPA or an equivalent state agency contends that we and other potentially responsible scrap metal suppliers are liable for the cleanup of those sites as a result of having sold scrap metal to unrelated manufacturers for recycling as a raw material in the manufacture of new products. We are involved in litigation or administrative proceedings with regard to several of these sites in which we are contesting, or at the appropriate time may contest, our liability. In addition, we have received information requests with regard to other sites which may be under consideration by the EPA as potential CERCLA sites.
We are presently participating in PRP organizations at several sites, which are paying for certain remediation expenses. Although we are unable to estimate precisely the ultimate dollar amount of exposure to loss in connection with various environmental matters or the effect on our consolidated financial position, we make accruals as warranted. In addition, although we do not believe that a reasonably possible range of loss in excess of amounts accrued for pending lawsuits, claims or proceedings would be material to our financial statements, additional developments may occur, and due to inherent uncertainties, including evolving remediation technology, changing regulations, possible third-party contributions, the inherent shortcomings of the estimation process, the uncertainties involved in litigation and other factors, the amounts we ultimately are required to pay could vary significantly from the amounts we accrue, and this could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Increased regulation associated with climate change and greenhouse gas emissions could impose significant additional costs on both our steelmaking and metals recycling operations.
The U.S. government and various governmental agencies have introduced or are contemplating regulatory changes in response to the potential impact of climate change. International treaties or agreements may also result in increasing regulation of greenhouse gas emissions, including the introduction of carbon emissions trading mechanisms. Any such regulation regarding climate change and greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions could impose significant costs on our steelmaking and metals recycling operations and on the operations of our customers and suppliers, including increased energy, capital equipment, environmental monitoring and reporting and other costs in order to comply with current or future laws or regulations concerning and limitations imposed on our operations by virtue of climate change and GHG emissions laws and regulations. The potential costs of "allowances," "offsets" or "credits" that may be part of potential cap-and-trade programs or similar future regulatory measures are still uncertain. Any adopted future climate change and GHG regulations could negatively impact our ability (and that of our customers and suppliers) to compete with companies situated in areas not subject to such limitations. From a medium and long-term perspective, as a result of these regulatory initiatives, we may see an increase in costs relating to our assets that emit significant amounts of GHGs. These
12
regulatory initiatives will be either voluntary or mandatory and may impact our operations directly or through our suppliers or customers. Until the timing, scope and extent of any future regulation becomes known, we cannot predict the effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition, but such effect could be materially adverse to our business, results of operations and financial condition.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMPANY
Potential limitations on our ability to access credit, or the ability of our customers and suppliers to access credit, may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If our access to credit is limited or impaired, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely impacted. Our senior unsecured debt is rated by Standard & Poor's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service and Fitch Group, Inc. In determining our credit ratings, the rating agencies consider a number of both quantitative and qualitative factors. These factors include earnings (loss), fixed charges such as interest, cash flows, total debt outstanding, off-balance sheet obligations and other commitments, total capitalization and various ratios calculated from these factors. The rating agencies also consider predictability of cash flows, business strategy and diversity, industry conditions and contingencies. Any downgrades in our credit ratings may make raising capital more difficult, increase the cost and affect the terms of future borrowings, affect the terms under which we purchase goods and services and limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities. We could also be adversely affected if our banks refused to honor their contractual commitments or cease lending.
We are also exposed to risks associated with the creditworthiness of our customers and suppliers. In certain markets, we have experienced a consolidation among those entities to whom we sell. This consolidation has resulted in an increased credit risk spread among fewer customers, often without a corresponding strengthening of their financial status. If the availability of credit to fund or support the continuation and expansion of our customers' business operations is curtailed or if the cost of that credit is increased, the resulting inability of our customers or of their customers to either access credit or absorb the increased cost of that credit could adversely affect our business by reducing our sales or by increasing our exposure to losses from uncollectible customer accounts. The consequences of such adverse effects could include the interruption of production at the facilities of our customers, the reduction, delay or cancellation of customer orders, delays or interruptions of the supply of raw materials we purchase, and bankruptcy of customers, suppliers or other creditors. Any of these events may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The potential impact of our customers' non-compliance with existing commercial contracts and commitments, due to insolvency or for any other reason, may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
From time to time in the past, some of our customers have sought to renegotiate or cancel their existing purchase commitments with us. In addition, some of our customers have breached previously agreed upon contracts to buy our products by refusing delivery of the products.
Where appropriate, we have and will in the future pursue litigation to recover our damages resulting from customer contract defaults. We also use credit insurance in Poland to mitigate the risk of customer insolvency. However, it is possible that we may not be capable of recovering all of our insured losses if the insurers with whom our accounts receivable are insured experience significant losses threatening their viability. Additionally, credit insurance policies typically have relatively short policy periods and require pre-approval of customers with maximum insured limits established by the customer. If credit insurers incur large losses, the insurance may be more difficult and more costly to secure and may be on less favorable terms. In addition, a significant amount of our accounts receivable are considered to be open account uninsured accounts receivable. A large number of our customers defaulting on existing contractual obligations to purchase our products could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The agreements governing our notes and our other debt contain financial covenants and impose restrictions on our business.
The indenture governing our 4.875% senior notes due 2023, our 5.750% senior notes due 2026, and our 5.375% senior notes due 2027 contains restrictions on our ability to create liens, sell assets, enter into sale and leaseback transactions and consolidate or merge. In addition to these restrictions, our credit facility contains covenants that restrict our ability to, among other things, enter into transactions with affiliates and guarantee the debt of some of our subsidiaries. Our credit facility also requires that we meet certain financial tests and maintain certain financial ratios, including maximum debt to capitalization and interest coverage ratios.
Other agreements that we may enter into in the future may contain covenants imposing significant restrictions on our business that are similar to, or in addition to, the covenants under our existing agreements. These restrictions may affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise.
13
Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. The breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under the indenture governing our notes or under our other debt agreements. An event of default under our debt agreements would permit our lenders to declare all amounts borrowed from them to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest. If we were unable to repay debt to our secured lenders or if we incur secured debt in the future, these lenders could proceed against the collateral securing that debt. In addition, acceleration of our other indebtedness may cause us to be unable to make interest payments on our notes.
We may not be able to successfully identify, consummate or integrate acquisitions, and acquisitions may adversely affect our financial leverage.
Part of our business strategy includes pursuing synergistic acquisitions. We have expanded, and plan to continue to expand, our business by making strategic acquisitions and regularly seeking suitable acquisition targets to enhance our growth. We may fund such acquisitions using cash on hand, drawing under our credit facility or accessing the capital markets. To the extent we finance such acquisitions with additional debt, the incurrence of such debt may result in a significant increase in our interest expense and financial leverage, which could be further exacerbated by volatility in the debt capital markets. Further, an increase in our leverage could lead to deterioration in our credit ratings.
The pursuit of acquisitions may pose certain risks to us. We may not be able to identify acquisition candidates that fit our criteria for growth and profitability. Even if we are able to identify such candidates, we may not be able to acquire them on terms or financing satisfactory to us. We will incur expenses and dedicate attention and resources associated with the review of acquisition opportunities, whether or not we consummate such acquisitions.
Additionally, even if we are able to acquire suitable targets on agreeable terms, we may not be able to successfully integrate their operations with ours. Achieving the anticipated benefits of any acquisition will depend in significant part upon whether we integrate such acquired businesses in an efficient and effective manner. We may not be able to achieve the anticipated operating and cost synergies or long-term strategic benefits of our acquisitions within the anticipated timing or at all. For example, elimination of duplicative costs may not be fully achieved or may take longer than anticipated. The benefits from any acquisition will be offset by the costs incurred in integrating the businesses and operations. We may also assume liabilities in connection with acquisitions to which we would not otherwise be exposed. An inability to realize any or all of the anticipated synergies or other benefits of an acquisition as well as any delays that may be encountered in the integration process, which may delay the timing of such synergies or other benefits, could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We may not be able to successfully or timely complete the pending acquisition of assets from Gerdau S.A.
On December 29, 2017, we entered into a definitive purchase agreement to acquire certain U.S. rebar steel mill and fabrication assets from Gerdau S.A., a producer of long and specialty steel products in the Americas for a cash purchase price of $600.0 million, subject to customary purchase price adjustments. We expect the acquisition to close before the end of calendar year 2018, subject to customary closing conditions. However, there can be no assurance that the acquisition will be completed or on what terms it may be completed.
There are a number of risks and uncertainties relating to the acquisition. For example, the acquisition may not be completed, or may not be completed in the time frame, on the terms or in the manner currently anticipated, as a result of a number of factors, including, among other things, the failure to satisfy one or more of the conditions to closing. There can be no assurance that the conditions to closing of the acquisition of the acquired businesses will be satisfied or waived or that other events will not intervene to delay or result in the failure to close such acquisition.
The consummation of the acquisition is subject to, among other things, review and approval under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”). In addition, both we and the sellers have the ability to terminate the purchase agreement under certain circumstances. Failure to complete the acquisition would prevent us from realizing the anticipated benefits of such acquisition. We would also remain liable for significant transaction costs, including legal, accounting and financial advisory fees, and we could become liable to the sellers if the purchase agreement is terminated under certain circumstances for a termination fee equal to $40.0 million. In addition, the market price of our common stock may reflect various market assumptions as to whether the acquisition will be completed. Consequently, the completion of, the failure to complete, or any delay in the closing of the acquisition could result in a significant change in the market price of our common stock.
14
Recently enacted U.S. tax legislation may adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.
On December 22, 2017, the President signed into law Public Law No. 115-97, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("TCJA"), following its passage by the United States Congress, which significantly changed the U.S. corporate income tax system. The TCJA requires complex computations to be performed which require significant judgments, estimates and calculations to be made in interpreting its provisions. The U.S. Treasury Department, the Internal Revenue Service, and other federal or state standard-setting bodies could interpret or issue guidance on how provisions of the TCJA will be applied or otherwise administered that is different from our interpretation. As we continue our ongoing analysis of the TCJA and its related interpretations, including interpretation of any additional guidance, we may be required to make adjustments to amounts that we have previously recorded that may adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
Goodwill impairment charges in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We review the recoverability of goodwill annually, as of the first day of our fiscal fourth quarter, and whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit may not be recoverable.
The impairment tests require us to make an estimate of the fair value of our reporting units and other long-lived assets. An impairment could be recorded as a result of changes in assumptions, estimates or circumstances, some of which are beyond our control. Factors which could result in an impairment include, but are not limited to: (i) reduced demand for our products; (ii) our cost of capital; (iii) higher material prices; (iv) slower growth rates in our industry; and (v) changes in the market based discount rates. Since a number of factors may influence determinations of fair value of goodwill, we are unable to predict whether impairments of goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangibles will occur in the future, and there can be no assurance that continued conditions will not result in future impairments of goodwill. The future occurrence of a potential indicator of impairment could include matters such as (i) a decrease in expected net earnings; (ii) adverse equity market conditions; (iii) a decline in current market multiples; (iv) a decline in our common stock price; (v) a significant adverse change in legal factors or the general business climate; (vi) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (vii) a significant downturn in non-residential construction markets in the U.S.; and (viii) levels of imported steel into the U.S. Any such impairment would result in us recognizing a non-cash charge in our consolidated statements of earnings, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Impairment of long-lived assets in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We have a significant amount of property, plant and equipment and finite-lived intangible assets that may be subject to impairment testing. Long-lived assets are subject to an impairment assessment when certain triggering events or circumstances indicate that their carrying value may be impaired. If the net carrying value of the asset or group of assets exceeds our estimate of future undiscounted cash flows of the operations related to the asset, the excess of the net book value over estimated fair value is charged to impairment loss in the consolidated statements of earnings. The primary factors that affect estimates of future cash flows for these long-lived asset groups are (i) management's scrap price outlook; (ii) scrap demand; (iii) working capital changes; (iv) capital expenditures; and (v) selling, general and administrative expenses. There can be no assurance that continued market conditions, demand for our products, or facility utilization levels or other factors will not result in future impairment charges.
Increases in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
An increase in the value of the U.S. dollar may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, and in particular, the increased strength of the U.S. dollar as compared to China's renminbi or the euro could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. A strong U.S. dollar makes imported metal products less expensive, resulting in more imports of steel products into the U.S. by our foreign competitors, while a weak U.S. dollar may have the opposite impact on imports. With the exception of exports of nonferrous scrap metal by our Americas Recycling segment, we have not recently been a significant exporter of metal products from our U.S. operations. Economic difficulties in some large steel-producing regions of the world, resulting in lower local demand for steel products, have historically encouraged greater steel exports to the U.S. at depressed prices which can be exacerbated by a strong U.S. dollar. As a result, our products that are made in the U.S. may become relatively more expensive as compared to imported steel, which has had, and in the future could have, a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
15
There can be no assurance that we will repurchase shares of our common stock at all or in any particular amounts.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized the Company to repurchase up to $100.0 million of shares of our common stock. The stock markets in general have experienced substantial price and trading fluctuations, which have resulted in volatility in the market prices of securities that often are unrelated or disproportionate to changes in operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. Price volatility over a given period may also cause the average price at which we repurchase our own common stock to exceed the stock's price at a given point in time. In addition, significant changes in the trading price of our common stock and our ability to access capital on terms favorable to us could impact our ability to repurchase shares of our common stock. The timing and amount of any repurchases will be determined by the Company's management based on its evaluation of market conditions, capital allocation alternatives and other factors beyond our control. Our share repurchase program may be modified, suspended, extended or terminated by the Company at any time and without notice.
Operating internationally carries risks and uncertainties which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We have significant facilities in Poland. Our Polish operations generated approximately 19% of our fiscal 2018 net sales. Our stability, growth and profitability are subject to a number of risks inherent in doing business internationally in addition to the currency exchange risk discussed above, including:
• | political, military, terrorist or major pandemic events; |
• | local labor and social issues; |
• | legal and regulatory requirements or limitations imposed by foreign governments (particularly those with significant steel consumption or steel-related production including China, Brazil, Russia and India), including quotas, tariffs or other protectionist trade barriers, adverse tax law changes, nationalization or currency restrictions; |
• | disruptions or delays in shipments caused by customs compliance or government agencies; and |
• | potential difficulties in staffing and managing local operations. |
These factors may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Operating, commodity and market risks associated with our new micro mill in Durant, Oklahoma could prevent us from realizing anticipated benefits and could result in a loss of all or a substantial part of our investment.
Although we have successfully commissioned and operated similar technology in Mesa, Arizona, there are technological, operational and market risks associated with our newest micro mill, located in Durant, Oklahoma. We believe this micro mill should be capable of consistently producing high-quality reinforcing bar and other products, and in sufficient quantities and at a cost that will compare favorably with other similar steel manufacturing facilities; however, this micro mill has been in operation for less than a year, and there can be no assurance that these expectations will be achieved. If we encounter systems or process difficulties or quality control restrictions, our costs could materially increase, the expected cost benefits from the development of this micro mill could be diminished or lost, and we could lose all or a substantial portion of our investment. We could also encounter commodity market risk if, during a sustained period, the cost to manufacture is greater than projected.
Scrap and other supplies for our business are subject to significant price fluctuations and limited availability, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
At any given time, we may be unable to obtain an adequate supply of critical raw materials at a price and other terms acceptable to us. We depend on ferrous scrap, the primary feedstock for our steel mills, and other supplies such as graphite electrodes and ferroalloys for our steel mill operations. The price of scrap and other supplies has historically been subject to significant fluctuation, and we may not be able to adjust our product prices to recover the costs of rapid increases in material prices, especially over the short-term and in our domestic fabrication segment's fixed price contracts. The profitability of our steel mill operations and domestic fabrication segments would be adversely affected if we are unable to pass on to our customers increased raw material and supply costs. Changing processes could potentially impact the volume of scrap metal available to us and the volume and realized margins of processed metal we sell.
The purchase prices for automobile bodies and various other grades of obsolete and industrial scrap, as well as the selling prices
16
for processed and recycled scrap metals we utilize in our own manufacturing process or resell to others, are highly volatile. A prolonged period of low scrap prices or a fall in scrap prices could reduce our ability to obtain, process and sell recycled material, which could have a material adverse effect on our metals recycling operations business, results of operations and financial condition. Our ability to respond to changing recycled metal selling prices may be limited by competitive or other factors during periods of low scrap prices, when the supply of scrap may decline considerably, as scrap generators hold onto their scrap in the hope of getting higher prices later. Conversely, increased foreign demand for scrap due to economic expansion in countries such as China, India, Brazil and Turkey can result in an outflow of available domestic scrap as well as higher scrap prices that cannot always be passed on to domestic scrap consumers, further reducing the available domestic scrap flows and scrap margins, all of which could adversely affect our sales and profitability.
Our Arkansas rerolling mill does not have melting capacity, so it is dependent on an adequate supply of competitively priced semi–finished billets either from our mini mills or competitors. Occasionally, our Arkansas rerolling mill utilizes used rail as a feedstock instead of billets, primarily from railroad abandonments or replacements. The inability to source billets internally or purchase competitively priced billets from other sources could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The availability and process of raw materials may also be negatively affected by new laws and regulations, allocations by suppliers, interruptions in production, accidents or natural disasters, changes in exchange rates, worldwide price fluctuations, and the availability and cost of transportation. If we were unable to obtain adequate and timely deliveries of our required raw materials, we may be unable to timely manufacture significant quantities of our products.
We rely on the availability of large amounts of electricity and natural gas for our mill operations. Disruptions in delivery or substantial increases in energy costs, including crude oil prices, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our EAF mills melt steel scrap in electric arc furnaces and use natural gas to heat steel billets for rolling into finished products. As large consumers of electricity and gas, often the largest in the geographic area where our mills are located, we must have dependable delivery of electricity and natural gas in order to operate. Accordingly, we are at risk in the event of an energy disruption. Prolonged black-outs or brown-outs or disruptions caused by natural disasters such as hurricanes would substantially disrupt our production. While we have not suffered prolonged production delays due to our inability to access electricity or natural gas, several of our competitors have experienced such occurrences. Prolonged substantial increases in energy costs would have an adverse effect on the costs of operating our mills and would negatively impact our gross margins unless we were able to fully pass through the additional expense to our customers. Our finished steel products are typically delivered by truck. Rapid increases in the price of fuel attributable to increases in crude oil prices would increase our costs and adversely affect many of our customers' financial results, which in turn could result in reduced margins and declining demand for our products. Rapid increases in fuel costs may also negatively impact our ability to charter ships for international deliveries at anticipated freight rates, thereby decreasing our margins on those transactions or causing our customers to look for alternative sources of supply.
The loss of or inability to hire key employees may adversely affect our ability to successfully manage our operations and meet our strategic objectives.
Our future success depends, in large part, on the continued service of our officers and other key employees and our ability to continue to attract and retain additional highly qualified personnel. These employees are integral to our success based on their expertise and knowledge of our business and products. We compete for such personnel with other companies, including public and private company competitors who may periodically offer more favorable terms of employment. The loss or interruption of the services of a number of our key employees could reduce our ability to effectively manage our operations due to the fact that we may not be able to find appropriate replacement personnel in a timely manner should the need arise.
We may have difficulty competing with companies that have a lower cost structure or access to greater financial resources.
We compete with regional, national and foreign manufacturers and traders. Consolidation among participants in the steel manufacturing and recycling industries has resulted in fewer competitors, and several of our competitors are significantly larger than us and have greater financial resources and more diverse businesses than us. Some of our foreign competitors may be able to pursue business opportunities without regard to certain of the laws and regulations with which we must comply, such as environmental regulations. These companies may have a lower cost structure and more operating flexibility, and consequently they may be able to offer better prices and more services than we can. There is no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully with these companies. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
17
Information technology interruptions and breaches in data security could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We rely on computers, information and communications technology and related systems and networks in order to operate our business, including to store sensitive data such as intellectual property, our own proprietary business information and that of our customers, suppliers and business partners and personally identifiable information of our employees. Increased global information technology security requirements, vulnerabilities, threats and a rise in sophisticated and targeted computer crime pose a risk to the security of our systems, networks and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of our data. Our systems and networks are also subject to damage or interruption from power outages, telecommunications failures, employee error and other similar events. Any of these or other events could result in system interruption, the disclosure, modification or destruction of proprietary and other key information, legal claims or proceedings, production delays or disruptions to operations including processing transactions and reporting financial results and could adversely impact our reputation and our operating results. We have taken steps to address these concerns and have implemented internal control and security measures to protect our systems and networks from security breaches; however, there can be no assurance that a system or network failure, or security breach, will not impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our mills require continual capital investments that we may not be able to sustain.
We must make regular substantial capital investments in our steel mills to maintain the mills, lower production costs and remain competitive. We cannot be certain that we will have sufficient internally generated cash or acceptable external financing to make necessary substantial capital expenditures in the future. The availability of external financing depends on many factors outside of our control, including capital market conditions and the overall performance of the economy. If funding is insufficient, we may be unable to develop or enhance our mills, take advantage of business opportunities and respond to competitive pressures.
Unexpected equipment failures may lead to production curtailments or shutdowns, which may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Interruptions in our production capabilities would adversely affect our production costs, steel available for sale and earnings for the affected period. Our manufacturing processes are dependent upon critical pieces of steel-making equipment, such as our furnaces, continuous casters and rolling equipment, as well as electrical equipment, such as transformers. This equipment may, on occasion, be out of service as a result of unanticipated failures. We have experienced, and may in the future experience, material plant shutdowns or periods of reduced production as a result of such equipment failures. In addition to equipment failures, our facilities are also subject to the risk of catastrophic loss due to unanticipated events such as fires, explosions or violent weather conditions.
Competition from other materials may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In many applications, steel competes with other materials, such as aluminum and plastics (particularly in the automobile industry), cement, composites, glass and wood. Increased use of or additional substitutes for steel products could adversely affect future market prices and demand for steel products.
Hedging transactions may expose us to losses or limit our potential gains.
Our product lines and worldwide operations expose us to risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and interest rates. As part of our risk management program, we sometimes use financial instruments, including metals commodity futures, natural gas forward contracts, freight forward contracts, foreign currency exchange forward contracts and interest rate swap contracts. While intended to reduce the effects of fluctuations in these prices and rates, these transactions may limit our potential gains or expose us to losses. If our counterparties to such transactions or the sponsors of the exchanges through which these transactions are offered, such as the London Metal Exchange, fail to honor their obligations due to financial distress, we would be exposed to potential losses or the inability to recover anticipated gains from these transactions.
We enter into the foreign currency exchange forward contracts as economic hedges of trade commitments or anticipated commitments denominated in currencies other than the functional currency to mitigate the effects of changes in currency rates. These foreign exchange commitments are dependent on timely performance by our counterparties. Their failure to perform could result in our having to close these hedges without the anticipated underlying transaction and could result in losses if foreign currency exchange rates have changed.
18
We are subject to litigation and legal compliance risks which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are involved in various litigation matters, including regulatory proceedings, administrative proceedings, governmental investigations, environmental matters and construction contract disputes. The nature of our operations also exposes us to possible litigation claims in the future. Because of the uncertain nature of litigation and coverage decisions, we cannot predict the outcome of these matters. These matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Litigation is very costly, and the costs associated with prosecuting and defending litigation matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Although we are unable to estimate precisely the ultimate dollar amount of exposure to loss in connection with litigation matters, we make accruals as warranted. However, the amounts that we accrue could vary significantly from the amounts we actually pay, due to inherent uncertainties and the inherent shortcomings of the estimation process, the uncertainties involved in litigation and other factors. See Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings of this Annual Report, for a description of our current significant legal proceedings.
As noted above, existing laws or regulations, as currently interpreted or reinterpreted in the future, and future laws and regulations, may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. See the risk factor "Compliance with and changes in environmental compliance requirements and remediation requirements could result in substantially increased capital requirements and operating costs; violations of environmental requirements could result in costs that have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition" above for a description of such risks relating to environmental laws and regulations. In addition to such environmental laws and regulations, complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations, including without limitation the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar laws in other countries, which generally prohibit companies and those acting on their behalf from making improper payments to foreign government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business, regulations related to import-export controls, the Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctions program and antiboycott provisions, may increase our cost of doing business in international jurisdictions and expose us and our employees to elevated risk. While we believe that we have adopted appropriate risk management and compliance programs, the nature of our operations means that legal and compliance risks will continue to exist. A negative outcome in an unusual or significant legal proceeding or compliance investigation could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Some of our operations present significant risk of injury or death.
The industrial activities conducted at certain of our facilities present significant risk of serious injury or death to our employees, customers or other visitors to our operations, notwithstanding our safety precautions, including our material compliance with federal, state and local employee health and safety regulations, and we may be unable to avoid material liabilities for injuries or deaths. We maintain workers' compensation insurance to address the risk of incurring material liabilities for injuries or deaths, but there can be no assurance that the insurance coverage will be adequate or will continue to be available on the terms acceptable to us, or at all, which could result in material liabilities to us for any injuries or deaths.
Health care legislation could result in substantially increased costs and adversely affect our workforce.
The health care mandates enacted in connection with the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act may cause us to evaluate the scope of health benefits offered to our workforce and the method in which they are delivered, and increase our and our employees' costs. If we are not able to offer a competitive level of benefits, our ability to hire and retain qualified personnel may be adversely affected. Higher health care costs may result in (i) an inability to reinvest sufficient capital in our operations, (ii) an inability to sustain dividends, (iii) lowered debt ratings and (iv) an increase in the cost of capital, all of which may have a negative effect on the price of our common stock and a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
19
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The following table describes our principal properties as of August 31, 2018. These properties are owned by us and not subject to any significant encumbrances, or are leased by us. We consider all properties to be appropriately utilized, suitable and adequate to meet the requirements of our present and foreseeable future operations. Refer to Part I, Item 1, Business, included in this Annual Report for a discussion of the nature of our operations.
Segment and Operation | Location | Site Acreage Owned | Site Acreage Leased | Approximate Building Square Footage | Capacity (Millions of Short Tons)(1) | |||||||||
Americas Recycling | 3.8 | |||||||||||||
Recycling | Five locations in Florida | 107 | — | 150,000 | ||||||||||
Recycling | Two locations in Georgia | 32 | — | 110,000 | ||||||||||
Recycling | Independence, Kansas | 5 | 5 | 10,000 | ||||||||||
Recycling | Shreveport, Louisiana | 6 | 2 | 20,000 | ||||||||||
Recycling | Two locations in Missouri | 42 | 3 | 90,000 | ||||||||||
Recycling | Two locations in North Carolina | 32 | — | 100,000 | ||||||||||
Recycling | Tulsa, Oklahoma | 29 | — | 50,000 | ||||||||||
Recycling | Five locations in South Carolina | 147 | 2 | 270,000 | ||||||||||
Recycling | Chattanooga, Tennessee | 19 | — | 160,000 | ||||||||||
Recycling | Fourteen locations in Texas | 230 | 9 | 390,000 | ||||||||||
Americas Mills | 3.4 | |||||||||||||
Steel Mini Mill | Birmingham, Alabama | 71 | 1 | 560,000 | ||||||||||
Steel Micro Mill | Mesa, Arizona | 229 | — | 300,000 | ||||||||||
Steel Rerolling Mill | Magnolia, Arkansas | 123 | — | 280,000 | ||||||||||
Steel Micro Mill | Durant, Oklahoma | 400 | — | 290,000 | ||||||||||
Steel Mini Mill | Cayce, South Carolina | 142 | — | 760,000 | ||||||||||
Steel Mini Mill | Seguin, Texas | 661 | — | 870,000 | ||||||||||
Recycling | Two locations in Alabama | 24 | — | 40,000 | ||||||||||
Recycling | Two locations in South Carolina | 166 | — | 50,000 | ||||||||||
Recycling | Four locations in Texas | 21 | 26 | 240,000 | ||||||||||
Americas Fabrication | 1.6 | |||||||||||||
Fabrication | Mesa, Arizona | — | — | 50,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Three locations in California | 27 | — | 180,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Two locations in Colorado | 8 | — | 120,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Two locations in Florida | 15 | — | 100,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Two locations in Georgia | 19 | 8 | 220,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Kapolei, Hawaii | 5 | — | 40,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Two locations in Illinois | 11 | 10 | 110,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Two locations in Louisiana | 21 | — | 190,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Polo, Missouri | 40 | — | 30,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Gastonia, North Carolina | 16 | — | 90,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Las Vegas, Nevada | 7 | — | 10,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Albuquerque, New Mexico | 4 | — | 20,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Durant, Oklahoma | — | — | 80,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Two locations in South Carolina | 8 | — | 100,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Nashville, Tennessee | 3 | — | 40,000 | ||||||||||
20
Fabrication | Twelve locations in Texas | 95 | 2 | 830,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Brigham City, Utah | 20 | — | 100,000 | ||||||||||
Fabrication | Two locations in Virginia | 10 | — | 60,000 | ||||||||||
Construction Services | Six locations in Louisiana | 7 | 6 | 110,000 | ||||||||||
Construction Services | Tulsa, Oklahoma | — | 2 | 30,000 | ||||||||||
Construction Services | Seventeen locations in Texas | 24 | 43 | 240,000 | ||||||||||
Impact Metals | Pell City, Alabama | 20 | — | 220,000 | ||||||||||
Impact Metals | Chicora, Pennsylvania | 92 | — | 80,000 | ||||||||||
International Mill | ||||||||||||||
Steel Mini Mill | Zawiercie, Poland | 517 | — | 2,760,000 | 1.3 | |||||||||
Fabrication | Four locations in Poland | 22 | 1 | 230,000 | 0.3 | |||||||||
Recycling | Twelve locations in Poland | 108 | 5 | 150,000 | 0.6 | |||||||||
(1) Refer to Part I, Item 1, Business, included in this Annual Report for a discussion of the calculation of capacity for our mill-related segments.
We lease the 132,395 square foot office space occupied by our corporate headquarters in Irving, Texas.
The leases in the table above generally expire on various dates over the next six years, with the exception of the CMCP leases. Several of the leases have renewal options. We have generally been able to renew leases prior to their expiration. We estimate our minimum annual rental obligation for our real estate operating leases in effect at August 31, 2018, to be paid during fiscal 2019, to be approximately $6.1 million.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the ordinary course of conducting our business, we become involved in litigation, administrative proceedings and government investigations, including environmental matters.
On April 28, 2016, the Company was served with a lawsuit filed by Ector County, Texas and the State of Texas by and through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality ("TCEQ") alleging violations of the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act, the Texas Water Code, the Texas Clean Air Act, and TCEQ rules on spill prevention and control. The Plaintiffs amended their petition in February 2017 to include violations of TCEQ rules on recycling and storm water permits. The Plaintiffs further amended their petition in April 2017, broadening their allegations. The lawsuit, filed in the 201st Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas, alleged improper disposal of solid waste and unauthorized outdoor burning activity at the Company’s recycling facility located in Odessa, Texas. The lawsuit sought a penalty for each day of alleged violation under the Texas Health & Safety Code, the Texas Water Code, or the Texas Administrative Code. The parties agreed to a mediated settlement on December 1, 2017 and entered into an Agreed Final Judgment on June 12, 2018. The Agreed Final Judgment was approved by the State of Texas on July 24, 2018. Under the settlement, the Company paid $1.1 million, net of insurance recoveries. The Company denies any wrongdoing in connection with the alleged claims, and the settlement does not contain an admission of liability from the Company.
We have received notices from the EPA or state agencies with similar responsibility that we and numerous other parties are considered PRPs and may be obligated under CERCLA, or similar state statutes, to pay for the cost of remedial investigation, feasibility studies and ultimately remediation to correct alleged releases of hazardous substances at ten locations. The notices refer to the following locations, none of which involve real estate we ever owned or upon which we ever conducted operations: the Sapp Battery Site in Cottondale, Florida, the Interstate Lead Company Site in Leeds, Alabama, the Ross Metals Site in Rossville, Tennessee, the Li Tungsten Site in Glen Cove, New York, the Peak Oil Site in Tampa, Florida, the R&H Oil Site in San Antonio, Texas, the SoGreen/Parramore Site in Tifton, Georgia, the Jensen Drive site in Houston, Texas, the Industrial Salvage site in Corpus Christi, Texas, and the Ward Transformer site in Raleigh, North Carolina. We may contest our designation as a PRP with regard to certain sites, while at other sites we are participating with other named PRPs in agreements or negotiations that have resulted or that we expect will result in agreements to remediate the sites. During 2010, we acquired a 70% interest in the real property at Jensen Drive as part of the remediation of that site. We have periodically received information requests from government environmental agencies with regard to other sites that are apparently under consideration for designation as listed sites under CERCLA or similar state statutes. Often we do not receive any further communication with regard to these sites, and as of the date of this Annual Report, we do not know if any of these inquiries will ultimately result in a demand for payment from us.
21
The EPA notified us and other alleged PRPs that under Section 106 of CERCLA, we and the other PRPs could be subject to a maximum fine of $25,000 per day and the imposition of treble damages if we and the other PRPs refuse to clean up the Peak Oil, Sapp Battery and SoGreen/Parramore sites as ordered by the EPA. We are presently participating in PRP organizations at these sites, which are paying for certain site remediation expenses. We do not believe that the EPA will pursue any fines against us if we continue to participate in the PRP groups or if we have adequate defenses to the EPA's imposition of fines against us in these matters.
We believe that adequate provisions have been made in the financial statements for the potential impact of any loss in connection with the above-described legal proceedings and environmental matters. Management believes that the outcome of the proceedings mentioned, and other miscellaneous litigation and proceedings now pending, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
MARKET AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
The table below summarizes the high and low prices per share of CMC common stock (as reported on the New York Stock Exchange), and the quarterly cash dividends per share that CMC paid for the past two fiscal years.
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
2018 FISCAL QUARTER | HIGH | LOW | CASH DIVIDENDS | |||
1st | $22.15 | $17.38 | $0.12 | |||
2nd | 26.72 | 19.24 | 0.12 | |||
3rd | 26.59 | 19.12 | 0.12 | |||
4th | 24.72 | 20.43 | 0.12 | |||
2017 FISCAL QUARTER | HIGH | LOW | CASH DIVIDENDS | |||
1st | $22.58 | $14.58 | $0.12 | |||
2nd | 24.64 | 19.90 | 0.12 | |||
3rd | 22.32 | 17.16 | 0.12 | |||
4th | 21.00 | 17.05 | 0.12 | |||
The number of stockholders of record of CMC common stock at October 23, 2018 was 2,855.
22
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table presents information about our equity compensation plans as of August 31, 2018:
Plan Category | (A) Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | (B) Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | (C) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (A)) | |||
Equity | ||||||
Compensation plans approved by security holders | 1,848,957 | $16.71 | 10,862,031 | |||
Equity | ||||||
Compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | — | |||
Total | 1,848,957 | $16.71 | 10,862,031 | |||
23
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the cumulative total return of CMC common stock during the five year period beginning September 1, 2013 and ending August 31, 2018 with the Standard & Poor's 500 Composite Stock Price Index (the "S&P 500") and the Standard & Poor's Steel Industry Group Index (the "S&P Steel"). Each index assumes $100 invested at the close of trading August 31, 2013, and reinvestment of dividends.
8/31/13 | 8/31/14 | 8/31/15 | 8/31/16 | 8/31/17 | 8/31/18 | |||||||
Commercial Metals Company | 100.00 | 119.14 | 111.67 | 113.94 | 142.21 | 166.38 | ||||||
S&P 500 | 100.00 | 125.25 | 125.84 | 141.64 | 164.64 | 197.01 | ||||||
S&P Steel | 100.00 | 128.76 | 102.66 | 119.14 | 138.97 | 161.61 | ||||||
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
There were no purchases of equity securities registered by the Company pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act during the quarter ended August 31, 2018.
24
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data derived from our audited financial statements for each of the five years in the period ended August 31, 2018. The data presented below should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" set forth in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report and the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
Net sales* | $ | 4,643,723 | $ | 3,844,069 | $ | 3,596,068 | $4,452,026 | $ | 5,027,975 | |||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 135,237 | 50,175 | 62,001 | 58,583 | 84,096 | |||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations | 1.16 | 0.43 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.72 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations | 1.14 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.71 | |||||||||||||||
Cash dividends per share | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.48 | |||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | 174,655 | 213,120 | 163,332 | 119,580 | 101,749 | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 3,328,304 | $ | 2,975,131 | $ | 3,130,869 | $ | 3,439,951 | $ | 3,833,708 | ||||||||||
Long-term debt (includes current maturities) | 1,158,365 | 824,762 | 1,071,417 | 1,282,355 | 1,282,212 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders' equity | 1,493,397 | 1,400,757 | 1,367,272 | 1,381,225 | 1,472,695 | |||||||||||||||
__________________________
* Excludes divisions classified as discontinued operations. For additional information on discontinued operations, see Note 3, Changes in Business, to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
25
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Annual Report contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities laws with respect to general economic conditions, key macro-economic drivers that impact our business, the effects of ongoing trade actions, the effects of continued pressure on the liquidity of our customers, potential synergies provided by our recent acquisitions, demand for our products, steel margins, the ability to operate our mills at full capacity, future supplies of raw materials and energy for our operations, share repurchases, legal proceedings, renewing the credit facilities of our Polish subsidiary, the reinvestment of undistributed earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries, U.S. non-residential construction activity, international trade, capital expenditures, our liquidity and our ability to satisfy future liquidity requirements, our new Oklahoma micro mill, estimated contractual obligations, the planned acquisition of substantially all of the U.S. rebar fabrication facilities and the steel mini mills located in or around Rancho Cucamonga, California, Jacksonville, Florida, Sayreville, New Jersey and Knoxville, Tennessee currently owned by Gerdau S.A. and certain of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Business”) and the timing thereof, the ability to obtain regulatory approvals and meet other closing conditions for the planned acquisition of the Business, and our expectations or beliefs concerning future events. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified by phrases such as we or our management "expects," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "intends," "plans to," "ought," "could," "will," "should," "likely," "appears," "projects," "forecasts," "outlook" or other similar words or phrases. There are inherent risks and uncertainties in any forward-looking statements. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.
Our forward-looking statements are based on management's expectations and beliefs as of the time this Annual Report is filed with the SEC or, with respect to any document incorporated by reference, as of the time such document was prepared. Although we believe that our expectations are reasonable, we can give no assurance that these expectations will prove to have been correct, and actual results may vary materially. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update, amend or clarify any forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, new information or circumstances or any other changes. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include those described in Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" of this Annual Report as well as the following:
• | changes in economic conditions which affect demand for our products or construction activity generally, and the impact of such changes on the highly cyclical steel industry; |
• | rapid and significant changes in the price of metals, potentially impairing our inventory values due to declines in commodity prices or reducing the profitability of our fabrication contracts due to rising commodity prices; |
• | excess capacity in our industry, particularly in China, and product availability from competing steel mills and other steel suppliers including import quantities and pricing; |
• | compliance with and changes in environmental laws and regulations, including increased regulation associated with climate change and greenhouse gas emissions; |
• | involvement in various environmental matters that may result in fines, penalties or judgments; |
• | potential limitations in our or our customers' abilities to access credit and non-compliance by our customers with our contracts; |
• | activity in repurchasing shares of our common stock under our repurchase program; |
• | financial covenants and restrictions on the operation of our business contained in agreements governing our debt; |
• | our ability to successfully identify, consummate, and integrate acquisitions and the effects that acquisitions may have on our financial leverage; |
• | risks associated with acquisitions generally, such as the inability to obtain, or delays in obtaining, required approvals under applicable antitrust legislation and other regulatory and third party consents and approvals; |
• | failure to retain key management and employees of the Business; |
• | issues or delays in the successful integration of the Business’ operations with those of the Company, including the inability to substantially increase utilization of the Business' steel mini mills, and incurring or experiencing unanticipated costs and/or delays or difficulties; |
26
• | difficulties or delays in the successful transition of the Business to the information technology systems of the Company as well as risks associated with other integration or transition of the operations, systems and personnel of the Business; |
• | unfavorable reaction to the acquisition of the Business by customers, competitors, suppliers and employees; |
• | lower than expected future levels of revenues and higher than expected future costs; |
• | failure or inability to implement growth strategies in a timely manner; |
• | impact of goodwill impairment charges; |
• | impact of long-lived asset impairment charges; |
• | currency fluctuations; |
• | global factors, including political uncertainties and military conflicts; |
• | availability and pricing of electricity, electrodes and natural gas for mill operations; |
• | ability to hire and retain key executives and other employees; |
• | competition from other materials or from competitors that have a lower cost structure or access to greater financial resources; |
• | information technology interruptions and breaches in security; |
• | ability to make necessary capital expenditures; |
• | availability and pricing of raw materials and other items over which we exert little influence, including scrap metal, energy and insurance; |
• | unexpected equipment failures; |
• | ability to realize the anticipated benefits of our investment in our new micro mill in Durant, Oklahoma; |
• | losses or limited potential gains due to hedging transactions; |
• | litigation claims and settlements, court decisions, regulatory rulings and legal compliance risks; |
• | risk of injury or death to employees, customers or other visitors to our operations; |
• | impacts of the TCJA; and |
• | increased costs related to health care reform legislation. |
This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes contained in this Annual Report.
OVERVIEW
As a vertically integrated organization, we manufacture, recycle and market steel and metal products, related materials and services through a network including four EAF mini mills, two EAF micro mills, a rerolling mill, steel fabrication and processing plants, construction-related product warehouses, and metal recycling facilities in the U.S. and Poland. Our operations are conducted through four reportable segments: Americas Recycling, Americas Mills, Americas Fabrication and International Mill. See Part I, Item 1. Business, for further information regarding our business and segments.
27
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SUMMARY
The following discussion of our results of operations is based on our continuing operations and excludes any results of our discontinued operations.
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands except per share data) | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||
Net sales* | $ | 4,643,723 | $ | 3,844,069 | $ | 3,596,068 | ||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 135,237 | 50,175 | 62,001 | |||||||||
Diluted earnings per share* | 1.14 | 0.43 | 0.53 | |||||||||
* from continuing operations
Fiscal Year 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year 2017
Continued improvement in global economic conditions in fiscal 2018, including increased steel consumption in energy and heavy machinery end-use markets, increased non-residential construction, and rising scrap prices, resulted in increases in net sales of $799.7 million, or 21%, and increased earnings from continuing operations by $85.1 million, or 170%, in both cases compared to fiscal 2017. These market conditions have led to increased pricing and margin expansion in our primary product offerings, which favorably impacted our year-over-year selling prices and profitability in our Americas Recycling, Americas Mills, and International Mill segments. Average selling prices in our Americas Fabrication segment, however, have not kept pace with increased input and production costs, resulting in reduced year–over–year results. However, new contract bookings indicate that pricing in this segment is beginning to reflect increased input costs.
We have incurred costs throughout fiscal 2018 related to the pending acquisition of the Business. These costs are reflected in the year-to-date results of our Corporate and Other segment. Additionally, our results for the twelve months ended August 31, 2018 include expenses in our Americas Mills segment related to start-up activities of our new micro mill in Durant, Oklahoma. During fiscal 2018, in connection with the disposition of certain non-core assets in our Americas Fabrication segment, we recorded an asset impairment of $13.7 million. Our fiscal 2018 results also reflect the estimated year-to-date discrete impact that the TCJA had on our net earnings.
During fiscal 2018, we concluded the wind down of our operations in the International Marketing and Distribution segment, the results of which are included in discontinued operations. As of August 31, 2018, we have collected substantially all proceeds related to the exit of this segment. See Note 3, Changes in Business, for further discussion of the wind down of the International Marketing and Distribution segment.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses from continuing operations in fiscal 2018 increased $14.1 million compared to fiscal 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $17.4 million increase in professional services for acquisition-related activities, partially offset by a $3.0 million decrease in employee-related expenses.
Interest Expense
Interest expense from continuing operations in fiscal 2018 decreased $3.2 million compared to fiscal 2017 due to (i) an $18.7 million decrease in fiscal 2018 as a result of the repayment of long-term debt during the fourth quarter of 2017, partially offset by (ii) an $11.7 million reduction in gains on interest rate swap transactions in fiscal 2018 resulting from the repayment of long-term debt during fiscal 2017 and (iii) a $2.5 million reduction in capitalized interest expense in fiscal 2018, primarily related to construction of our steel micro mill in Durant, Oklahoma. See Note 10, Credit Arrangements, for additional information regarding the repayment of long-term debt.
Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rate from continuing operations for the year ended August 31, 2018 was 18.2% compared to 23.3% for the year ended August 31, 2017. The year-over-year decrease was primarily due to $8.2 million of benefit on fiscal 2018 earnings from the reduction in the statutory corporate tax rate from 35% to a blended rate of 25.7% as a result of the TCJA as well as the following discrete benefits recorded during fiscal 2018: (i) $6.1 million related to a worthless stock deduction from the reorganization and exit of our steel trading business headquartered in the United Kingdom, (ii) $4.7 million related to federal research and experimentation expenditures and (iii) $3.2 million related to net favorable adjustments resulting from an audit
28
settlement. These benefits were partially offset by $11.0 million in additional income tax expense recorded for the effects of the TCJA. See Note 14, Income Tax, for further discussion of the effects of the TCJA.
Fiscal Year 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year 2016
Summary
Net sales for fiscal 2017 increased $248.0 million, or 7%, compared to fiscal 2016. The increase in net sales was primarily due to increasing ferrous scrap prices throughout fiscal 2017, strong scrap demand from increased U.S. steel mill capacity utilization, improved demand in the construction and energy markets and increasing average selling prices in Poland due to lower rebar imports.
Earnings from continuing operations were $50.2 million and $62.0 million for fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively. The year-over-year decrease was primarily due to margin pressures faced by our Americas Mills and Americas Fabrication segments from aggressive competition spurred by continued high levels of imported rebar into the U.S. at low pricing. Partially offsetting these margin pressures were improved results in fiscal 2017 in our Americas Recycling segment, resulting from rising scrap prices and margin expansion. Additionally, our International Mill segment realized improved 2017 results, driven primarily by an increase in volumes. Also contributing to the decline in year-over-year earnings from continuing operations, in fiscal 2017 we recognized an increase in debt extinguishment costs of $11.2 million and a $4.7 million increase in severance costs. Our results also include a reduction in year-over-year impairment charges of $38.3 million, primarily related to the impairment of certain long-lived assets in our Americas Recycling segment during fiscal 2016.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses from continuing operations in fiscal 2017 increased $3.6 million compared to fiscal 2016. The increase was primarily due to a $7.1 million increase in professional services and a $1.4 million increase in employee-related expenses. The increase was partially offset by a $4.5 million decrease in bad debt expense.
Interest Expense
Interest expense from continuing operations in fiscal 2017 decreased $18.8 million compared to fiscal 2016 primarily due to: (i) a $7.8 million decrease in cash interest expense from the repayment of long-term debt during fiscal years 2016 and 2017; (ii) a $4.1 million acceleration of unamortized deferred gains on interest rate swap transactions as a result of early extinguishment of long-term debt; and (iii) a $6.5 million increase in capitalized interest, which decreased interest expense, related to construction of our micro mill in Durant, Oklahoma. See Note 10, Credit Arrangements, for additional information regarding the repayment of long-term debt.
Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rate from continuing operations for the year ended August 31, 2017 was 23.3% compared to 18.4% for the year ended August 31, 2016. The year-over-year increase in our effective income tax rate was primarily due to a non-recurring $10.3 million discrete benefit recorded during fiscal 2016 related to the settlement of an audit. Our income tax rate in fiscal 2017 also increased due to a lower benefit realized under Section 199 of the Internal Revenue Code ("Section 199") compared to the benefit realized during fiscal 2016. The decrease in the Section 199 benefit was primarily driven by lower income before income taxes in the U.S. Our fiscal 2017 effective tax rate was less than the statutory rate of 35% due to benefits from a higher proportion of global income earned from operations in countries that have lower statutory income tax rates than the U.S., including Poland, which has a statutory income tax rate of 19%. Additionally, our effective income tax rate was favorably impacted by a non-taxable gain on assets related to our nonqualified Benefits Restoration Plan ("BRP"), which was larger than the comparable non-taxable gain recognized during fiscal 2016.
SEGMENTS
Unless otherwise indicated, results for our reportable segments are from continuing operations. All amounts are computed and presented in a manner that is consistent with the basis in which we internally disaggregate financial information for the purpose of making operating decisions. See Note 21, Business Segments, for further information on how we evaluate financial performance of our segments.
29
Fiscal Year 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year 2017
Americas Recycling
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 1,365,429 | $ | 1,011,500 | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA | 68,694 | 33,541 | ||||||
Average selling price (per short ton) | ||||||||
Ferrous | $ | 289 | $ | 242 | ||||
Nonferrous | 2,238 | 2,019 | ||||||
Short tons shipped (in thousands) | ||||||
Ferrous | 2,435 | 1,999 | ||||
Nonferrous | 263 | 234 | ||||
Total short tons shipped | 2,698 | 2,233 | ||||
Net sales in fiscal 2018 increased $353.9 million, or 35%, compared to fiscal 2017 as a result of increases in ferrous and nonferrous short tons shipped of 22% and 12%, respectively, coupled with increased ferrous and nonferrous selling prices of $47 and $219 per short ton, respectively. Improvements in total short tons shipped contributed to approximately 56% of the total year-over-year increase in net sales. Increases in both ferrous and nonferrous selling prices and shipments resulted from strong scrap demand due to increased domestic steel mill capacity utilization. Also driving the increase in ferrous tons shipped in fiscal 2018, as compared to fiscal 2017, was our acquisition of seven recycling facilities during the third quarter of fiscal 2017. These additional facilities accounted for approximately 65% of the year-over-year increase in total short tons shipped. See Note 3, Changes in Business, for further information regarding the acquisition of these recycling facilities.
Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2018 increased $35.2 million compared to fiscal 2017 primarily due to increases of 19% and 9% in average ferrous and nonferrous metal margins, respectively, coupled with increases in both ferrous and nonferrous tons shipped. Partially offsetting the impact of increased margins and volumes on adjusted EBITDA were increased year-over-year operating costs of approximately $3 per ton related to repairs and maintenance and supply costs, as well as a 2% per ton increase in freight. Adjusted EBITDA included non-cash stock compensation expense of $1.3 million and $0.8 million, in fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Americas Mills
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 1,996,903 | $ | 1,565,454 | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA | 301,805 | 224,183 | ||||||
Average price (per short ton) | ||||||||
Total selling price | $ | 612 | $ | 526 | ||||
Cost of ferrous scrap utilized | 303 | 243 | ||||||
Metal margin | 309 | 283 | ||||||
Short tons (in thousands) | ||||||
Melted | 2,922 | 2,603 | ||||
Rolled | 2,673 | 2,476 | ||||
Shipped | 3,013 | 2,725 | ||||
Net sales in fiscal 2018 increased $431.4 million, or 28%, compared to fiscal 2017. The increase in net sales for fiscal 2018 was primarily due to an increase in average selling price of $86 per short ton, contributing to approximately 60% of the total year-over-year increase, largely in response to the rising scrap prices described above in our Americas Recycling segment. Also contributing to the increase in net sales in fiscal 2018 over fiscal 2017 was an 11% increase in volumes, as shipments increased
30
by 288 short tons, including 91 short tons shipped by our new micro mill in Durant during fiscal 2018. Increased volumes across all mills are a result of improved demand from the service center industry, increased spending in non-residential construction and general improvement in the energy and industrial machinery sectors.
Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2018 increased $77.6 million compared to fiscal 2017 due to an increase in average metal margin of $26 per short ton as average selling prices outpaced ferrous scrap cost increases. Partially offsetting margin expansion were increases in freight costs of 5% per ton, and increased conversion costs of approximately $2 per ton, due to increased prices for electrodes and alloys compared to fiscal 2017. Adjusted EBITDA included non-cash stock compensation expense of $5.2 million and $3.8 million, in fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2018 also included certain amounts related to our new micro mill in Durant, Oklahoma, including startup costs (excluding depreciation, interest, and equity compensation) of $13.5 million, and $3.0 million of incentives recorded as income.
Americas Fabrication
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 1,427,882 | $ | 1,375,928 | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA | (39,394 | ) | 27,259 | |||||
Average selling price (excluding stock and buyout sales) (per short ton) | ||||||||
Rebar and other | $ | 800 | $ | 772 | ||||
Short tons shipped (in thousands) | ||||||
Rebar and other | 1,114 | 1,121 | ||||
Net sales in fiscal 2018 increased $52.0 million, or 4%, compared to fiscal 2017. The increase in net sales was due to an increase in the average selling price of $28 per short ton compared to fiscal 2017, while year-over-year shipments were relatively flat. Average selling prices in this segment were largely driven by projects that were contracted prior to the escalation of scrap and other input costs.
Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2018 decreased $66.7 million compared to fiscal 2017, primarily due to a 25% decrease in average rebar fabrication metal margin, driven by the lag in our fabrication project backlog where average selling prices did not keep pace with increasing raw material costs. Also contributing to the reduction in adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2018 were increases in freight and employee-related costs of 14% and 4%, respectively, both on a per ton basis, as compared to fiscal 2017. Adjusted EBITDA included non-cash stock compensation expense of $2.2 million in each of fiscal 2018 and 2017.
International Mill
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 887,038 | $ | 637,273 | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA | 131,720 | 76,068 | ||||||
Average price (per short ton) | ||||||||
Total sales | $ | 560 | $ | 432 | ||||
Cost of ferrous scrap utilized | 314 | 240 | ||||||
Metal margin | 246 | 192 | ||||||
Short tons (in thousands) | ||||||||
Tons melted | 1,542 | 1,465 | ||||||
Tons rolled | 1,317 | 1,286 | ||||||
Tons shipped | 1,500 | 1,379 | ||||||
31
Net sales in fiscal 2018 increased $249.8 million, or 39%, compared to fiscal 2017. The increase in net sales included a favorable foreign currency exchange rate impact of $74.2 million due to the decrease in the year-over-year average value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Polish zloty in fiscal 2018, as compared to fiscal 2017. Excluding the foreign exchange impact, net sales increased by approximately 28% on a year-over-year basis, driven largely by strong demand resulting from increased construction activity and economic improvements in Poland and surrounding markets, leading to increases in average selling prices and shipments of 30% and 9%, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2018 increased $55.7 million compared to fiscal 2017, primarily driven by a $54 per short ton, or 28%, increase in average metal margin. Metal margin expansion occurred across all product lines during fiscal 2018, as increased selling prices outpaced average cost increases, particularly for higher-margin merchant products. This increase in adjusted EBITDA was partially offset by increased employee-related expenses of $11.6 million, or 14% on a per ton basis. Adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2018 included a favorable foreign currency exchange rate impact of approximately $10.4 million due to the decrease in the year-over-year average value of the U.S. dollar relative to the Polish zloty in fiscal 2018, as compared to fiscal 2017. Adjusted EBITDA included non-cash stock compensation expense of $1.4 million and $0.7 million, in fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Corporate and Other
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (110,604 | ) | $ | (125,229 | ) | ||
Corporate and Other adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2018 improved by $14.6 million compared to fiscal 2017, primarily due to a $22.7 million loss on debt extinguishment in fiscal 2017 which did not reoccur in fiscal 2018. Additionally, employee-related expenses decreased by $15.5 million year-over-year due primarily to the exit of certain executives in fiscal 2017. Partially offsetting these year-over-year reductions was a $19.5 million increase in professional service fees in fiscal 2018, primarily incurred in connection with the pending acquisition of the Business. See Note 3, Changes in Business, for further information.
Discontinued Operations
See Note 3, Changes in Business, for information regarding discontinued operations.
Fiscal Year 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year 2016
Americas Recycling
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 1,011,500 | $ | 705,795 | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA | 33,541 | (2,975 | ) | |||||
Average selling price (per short ton) | ||||||||
Ferrous | $ | 242 | $ | 192 | ||||
Nonferrous | 2,019 | 1,711 | ||||||
Short tons shipped (in thousands) | ||||||
Ferrous | 1,999 | 1,614 | ||||
Nonferrous | 234 | 201 | ||||
Total short tons shipped | 2,233 | 1,815 | ||||
Net sales in fiscal 2017 increased $305.7 million, or 43%, compared to fiscal 2016 primarily due to an increase in the average ferrous selling price by $50 per short ton coupled with a 24% increase in ferrous tons shipped. Additionally, the average nonferrous selling price increased $308 per short ton and nonferrous tons shipped increased 16%. The improvements in ferrous and nonferrous tons shipped resulted from strong scrap demand due to increased U.S. steel mill capacity utilization along with our acquisition of seven recycling facilities during the third quarter of fiscal 2017.
32
Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2017 increased $36.5 million compared to fiscal 2016. Adjusted EBITDA was positively affected by the increase in average ferrous metal margin of 10%, coupled with average nonferrous metal margin expansion of 15%. Furthermore, employee-related expenses declined 16% per short ton and increases in tons shipped discussed above were partially offset by a 10% per short ton increase in supplies expense. Adjusted EBITDA included non-cash stock compensation expense of $0.8 million and $1.0 million, in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Americas Mills
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 1,565,454 | $ | 1,498,848 | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA | 224,183 | 262,192 | ||||||
Average price (per short ton) | ||||||||
Total selling price | $ | 526 | $ | 524 | ||||
Cost of ferrous scrap utilized | 243 | 207 | ||||||
Metal margin | 283 | 317 | ||||||
Short tons (in thousands) | ||||||
Melted | 2,603 | 2,522 | ||||
Rolled | 2,476 | 2,382 | ||||
Shipped | 2,725 | 2,630 | ||||
Net sales in fiscal 2017 increased $66.6 million, or 4%, compared to fiscal 2016 due to a 4% increase in total shipments compared to fiscal 2016, while average selling prices remained flat. Finished products shipments and shipments of our semi-finished products increased approximately 60 thousand and 35 thousand short tons, respectively, compared to fiscal 2016 due to stronger demand in fiscal 2017.
Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2017 decreased $38.0 million compared to fiscal 2016, due to average metal margin decreasing $34 per short ton as average selling prices did not keep pace with ferrous scrap cost increases. Partially offsetting margin compression was a $4.1 million decrease in repairs and maintenance expenses due to variances in the timing and amounts of routine maintenance and equipment upgrades. Adjusted EBITDA included non-cash stock compensation expense of $3.8 million and $3.7 million, in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Americas Fabrication
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 1,375,928 | $ | 1,489,455 | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA | 27,259 | 90,467 | ||||||
Average selling price (excluding stock and buyout sales) (per short ton) | ||||||||
Rebar and other | $ | 772 | $ | 841 | ||||
Short tons shipped (in thousands) | ||||||
Rebar and other | 1,121 | 1,155 | ||||
Net sales in fiscal 2017 decreased $113.5 million, or 8%, compared to fiscal 2016. The decrease in net sales was primarily due to a decrease in the average selling price of $69 per short ton compared to fiscal 2016 as a result of aggressive competition spurred by significant imports of low cost rebar during fiscal 2017, negatively impacting the average selling price of projects running through our fabrication backlog, coupled with a 3% decrease in tons shipped, compared to fiscal 2016.
Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2017 decreased $63.2 million compared to fiscal 2016, primarily due to a decrease in average composite metal margin of 15% as the average composite selling price declined faster than the decline in average composite material cost
33
and selling, general and administrative costs, compared to fiscal 2016. Adjusted EBITDA included non-cash stock compensation expense of $2.2 million and $2.6 million, in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.
International Mill
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 637,273 | $ | 520,831 | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA | 76,068 | 57,553 | ||||||
Average price (per short ton) | ||||||||
Total sales | $ | 432 | $ | 391 | ||||
Cost of ferrous scrap utilized | 240 | 195 | ||||||
Metal margin | 192 | 196 | ||||||
Short tons (in thousands) | ||||||||
Melted | 1,465 | 1,284 | ||||||
Rolled | 1,286 | 1,243 | ||||||
Shipped | 1,379 | 1,254 | ||||||
Net sales in fiscal 2017 increased $116.4 million, or 22%, compared to fiscal 2016 primarily due to a 10% increase in average selling price, as well as a 10% increase in shipments. The increase in average selling price in fiscal 2017 was due to strong demand for steel as a result of manufacturing and industrial activity, coupled with a shift in product mix, including a 5% increase in higher-priced merchant shipments, compared to fiscal 2016. Changes in the U.S. dollar relative to the Polish zloty did not have a material impact on the change in this segment's net sales for fiscal 2017.
Adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2017 increased $18.5 million compared to fiscal 2016, primarily driven by the increase in volume discussed above. However, during fiscal 2017, average metal margin decreased 2% as a result of a $45 per short ton increase in average cost of ferrous scrap utilized compared to fiscal 2016. This increase was partially offset by a $41 per short ton increase in the average selling price over fiscal 2016 as well as reductions in utilities expense per ton of 6% resulting from lower energy rates and greater efficiencies in our production processes. Changes in the U.S. dollar relative to the Polish zloty did not have a material impact on the change in this segment's adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2017. Adjusted EBITDA included non-cash stock compensation expense of $0.7 million and $0.8 million, in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Corporate and Other
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (125,229 | ) | $ | (102,000 | ) | ||
Corporate and Other adjusted EBITDA in fiscal 2017 deteriorated by $23.2 million compared to fiscal 2016 primarily due to a loss on debt extinguishment of $22.7 million in fiscal 2017 compared to $11.5 million in fiscal 2016. Additionally, severance expense related to the exit of certain executives and professional service fees increased by $2.1 million and $6.7 million, respectively, compared to fiscal 2016.
Discontinued Operations
See Note 3, Changes in Business, for information regarding discontinued operations.
FISCAL 2018 LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
While we believe the lending institutions participating in our credit arrangements are financially capable, the banking industry and capital markets periodically experience volatility that may limit our ability to raise capital. Additionally, changes to our credit rating by any rating agency may impact our ability to raise capital and manage our financing costs.
34
The table below reflects our sources, facilities and availability of liquidity as of August 31, 2018:
(in thousands) | Total Facility | Availability | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 622,473 | $ | 622,473 | ||||
Notes due from 2023 to 2027 | 980,000 | * | ||||||
Revolving credit facility | 350,000 | 346,728 | ||||||
U.S. receivables sale facility | 200,000 | 169,447 | ||||||
2022 Term Loan | 142,500 | — | ||||||
Poland receivables sale facility | 54,051 | 41,904 | ||||||
Bank credit facilities — uncommitted | 60,808 | 59,727 | ||||||
Other, including equipment notes | 47,629 | * | ||||||
_________________________________
* We believe we have access to additional financing and refinancing, if needed.
See Note 10, Credit Arrangements, for additional information.
Sources of Liquidity and Capital Resources
We expect cash on hand and cash generated from operations to be sufficient to meet all interest and principal payments due within the next twelve months.
Historically, our U.S. operations have generated the majority of our cash, which has been used to fund the cash needs of our U.S. operations. Additionally, as of August 31, 2018, our U.S. operations had access to a $350.0 million revolving credit facility as well as the sale of trade accounts receivable program described below.
Our foreign operations generated approximately 19% of our net sales in fiscal 2018. At August 31, 2018, cash and cash equivalents of $10.4 million were held by our non-U.S. subsidiaries. In general, it is our practice and intention to reinvest the earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries in those operations. See Note 14, Income Tax, for additional information regarding distributions of earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries.
We regularly maintain a substantial amount of accounts receivable. We actively monitor our accounts receivable and, based on market conditions and customers' financial condition, record allowances as soon as we believe accounts are uncollectible. We use credit insurance internationally to mitigate the risk of customer insolvency. We estimate that the amount of credit insured receivables (and those covered by export letters of credit) was approximately 18% of total receivables at August 31, 2018.
For added flexibility, we sell certain accounts receivable both in the U.S. and Poland and may draw cash advances as needed. Our U.S. sale of accounts receivable program contains certain cross-default provisions whereby a termination event could occur if we default under certain of our credit arrangements. Additionally, our U.S. sale of accounts receivable program contains covenants that are consistent with the covenants contained in the Credit Agreement (as defined in Note 10, Credit Arrangements). See Note 5, Sales of Accounts Receivable, for additional information on our sale of accounts receivable programs.
Stock Repurchase Program
During the first quarter of fiscal 2015, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $100.0 million of outstanding common stock. As of August 31, 2018, $27.6 million of our common stock was available to be purchased under this program. We intend to repurchase shares from time to time for cash in the open market or privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws. The timing and the amount of repurchases, if any, will be determined by management based on an evaluation of market conditions, capital allocation alternatives and other factors. The share repurchase program does not require us to purchase any dollar amount or number of shares of our common stock and may be modified, suspended, extended or terminated at any time without prior notice. We did not purchase any shares of common stock during fiscal 2018 or 2017.
35
Acquisitions
On December 29, 2017, we entered into a definitive stock and asset purchase agreement to acquire certain U.S. rebar steel mill and fabrication assets from Gerdau S.A. See Note 3, Changes in Business, for further information. We expect to fund the purchase price for the acquisition with cash on hand together with proceeds from the 2026 Notes and borrowings under the 2018 Term Loan (both defined in Note 10, Credit Arrangements). The closing of the transaction is expected before the end of calendar year 2018 and is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions, including regulatory review.
We regularly review potential acquisitions. We believe available cash resources, bank financing or the issuance of debt or equity could be used to finance future acquisitions. There can be no assurance we will enter into new acquisitions.
Operating Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures
Our cash flows from operating activities result primarily from sales of steel and related products, and to a lesser extent, sales of nonferrous metal products. We have a diverse and generally stable customer base. From time to time, we use futures or forward contracts to mitigate the risks from fluctuations in metal commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. See Note 12, Derivatives and Risk Management, for further information.
Fiscal 2018 Compared to Fiscal 2017
Operating Activities
Net cash flows from operating activities decreased by $15.8 million for fiscal 2018, compared to fiscal 2017. The decrease in net cash flows from operating activities in fiscal 2018 was driven primarily by (i) year-over-year increases in operating assets and liabilities ("working capital") caused by cyclical increases in commodity pricing and demand, and (ii) net repayments during fiscal 2018 under our sale of accounts receivable programs of $77.9 million, as compared to net advances of $81.7 million during fiscal 2017. Partially offsetting these decreases in operating cash flows was an increase in net earnings, after giving effect to non-cash items, as well as net cash collections of approximately $145 million associated with the wind down of working capital related to the exit of our International Marketing and Distribution segment. For continuing operations, days sales outstanding and days sales in inventory each declined by two days during fiscal 2018.
Investing Activities
Net cash flows used by investing activities decreased by $31.9 million for fiscal 2018, compared to fiscal 2017. Cash outflows related to capital expenditures in fiscal 2018 were $38.5 million lower on a year-over-year basis, in large part due to decreased spending in fiscal 2018 related to the construction of our new Oklahoma micro mill. Also contributing to the decrease in outflows in fiscal 2018 was a $49.1 million reduction in cash used for acquisitions. Largely offsetting these reduced outflows, our cash receipts related to dispositions were $88.0 million less in fiscal 2018, with the majority of such activity related to the exit of our International Marketing and Distribution segment. Also contributing to the net decrease in cash flows used by investing activities were cash receipts of $27.4 million in fiscal 2018 related to settlements under certain life insurance policies, with no comparable activity in fiscal 2017.
We estimate that our fiscal 2019 capital budget will range between approximately $150 million and $200 million. We regularly assess our capital spending and reevaluate our requirements based on current and expected results.
Financing Activities
Net cash flows from financing activities increased $583.9 million for fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017. The increase was primarily a result of changes in long-term debt financing activities. During fiscal 2018, we raised $350.0 million in connection with the issuance of the 2026 Notes (as defined in Note 10, Credit Arrangements), which are intended to partially fund the acquisition of the Business. In contrast, during fiscal 2017, we had net cash outflows related to long-term debt activities, including repayments of $711.9 million, partially offset by combined proceeds of $475.5 million from the issuance of the 2027 Notes and a draw under the Term Loan (both defined in Note 10, Credit Arrangements). See Note 10, Credit Arrangements, for additional information regarding long-term debt transactions occurring during fiscal 2018 and 2017. We regularly evaluate the use of our cash in efforts to maximize total shareholder return, including debt repayment, capital deployment, share repurchases and dividends.
We anticipate our current cash balances, cash flows from operations and our available credit sources will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements, including our scheduled debt repayments, payments for our contractual obligations, capital expenditures, working capital needs, share repurchases, dividends and other prudent uses of our capital, such as future acquisitions. However, in the event of sustained market deterioration, we may need additional liquidity, which would require us to evaluate available alternatives and take appropriate steps to obtain sufficient additional funds.
36
Fiscal 2017 Compared to Fiscal 2016
Operating Activities
Net cash flows from operating activities decreased $412.4 million for fiscal 2017, compared to fiscal 2016, primarily due to cash used for working capital of $65.9 million resulting from cyclical increases in commodity pricing and demand, as well as a decrease in net earnings, after giving effect to non-cash items. Days sales outstanding improved by two days and days sales in inventory deteriorated by two days during fiscal 2017.
Investing Activities
Net cash flows used by investing activities decreased $51.3 million for fiscal 2017, compared to fiscal 2016, primarily due to a $159.1 million increase in proceeds from the sale of subsidiaries, partially offset by a $56.1 million increase in cash used for acquisitions and a $49.8 million increase in capital expenditures. See Note 3, Changes in Business, for additional information regarding dispositions and acquisitions occurring during fiscal 2017.
Financing Activities
Net cash flows used by financing activities decreased $53.2 million during fiscal 2017, compared to fiscal 2016. The primary financing activities occurring during fiscal 2017 were: (i) repayments of long-term debt, resulting in a $500.5 million increase in similar activity as compared to fiscal 2016 and (ii) issuance of new debt, resulting in $475.5 million in proceeds from long-term debt transactions during fiscal 2017, compared to no such activity in fiscal 2016. See Note 10, Credit Arrangements, for additional information regarding long-term debt transactions occurring during fiscal 2017. Also contributing to the decrease in net cash flows used by financing activities was the repayment of short-term borrowings of $20.1 million and purchases of our common stock of $30.6 million during fiscal 2016 while no such activity occurred during fiscal 2017. Further, cash used by documentary letters of credit decreased $41.5 million during fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016.
Contractual Obligations
The following table represents our contractual obligations as of August 31, 2018:
Payments Due By Period* | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations (in thousands) | Total | Less than 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | More than 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt(1) | $ | 1,170,129 | $ | 19,746 | $ | 27,482 | $ | 456,662 | $ | 666,239 | ||||||||||
Interest | 412,730 | 58,436 | 117,014 | 109,952 | 127,328 | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases(2) | 65,144 | 22,714 | 26,169 | 14,401 | 1,860 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations(3) | 337,864 | 325,717 | 9,798 | 1,808 | 541 | |||||||||||||||
U.S. federal repatriation tax liability | 29,880 | 2,390 | 4,781 | 4,781 | 17,928 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations | $ | 2,015,747 | $ | 429,003 | $ | 185,244 | $ | 587,604 | $ | 813,896 | ||||||||||
__________________________________
* We have not discounted the cash obligations in this table.
(1) | Total amounts are included in the August 31, 2018 consolidated balance sheet. See Note 10, Credit Arrangements, for more information regarding scheduled maturities of our long-term debt. |
(2) | Includes minimum lease payment obligations for noncancelable equipment and real estate leases in effect as of August 31, 2018. See Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies, for more information regarding minimum lease commitments payable for noncancelable operating leases. |
(3) | Approximately 53% of these purchase obligations are for inventory items to be sold in the normal course of business. Purchase obligations include all enforceable, legally binding agreements to purchase goods or services that specify all significant terms, regardless of the duration of the agreement. Agreements with variable terms are excluded because we are unable to estimate the minimum amounts. Another significant obligation relates to capital expenditures. |
We provide certain eligible employees benefits pursuant to our nonqualified BRP equal to amounts that would have been available under the tax qualified plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), but for limitations of ERISA, tax laws and regulations. We did not include estimated payments related to the BRP in the above contractual obligation table. Refer to Note 17, Employees' Retirement Plans, for more information on the BRP.
37
Other Commercial Commitments
We maintain stand-by letters of credit to provide support for certain transactions that governmental agencies, our insurance providers and suppliers request. At August 31, 2018, we had committed $23.8 million under these arrangements, of which $3.3 million reduced availability under the Credit Agreement (as defined in Note 10, Credit Arrangements).
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
For added flexibility, we sell certain accounts receivable both in the U.S. and Poland. We utilize proceeds from cash advances under the sales of the trade accounts receivables programs as an alternative to short-term borrowings, effectively managing our overall costs and providing an additional source of working capital. We account for sales of the trade accounts receivables as true sales and the trade accounts receivable balances that are sold are removed from the consolidated balance sheets. The proceeds from cash advances and repayments of advances are reflected as cash provided by or used by, respectively, operating activities on our consolidated statements of cash flows. See Note 5, Sales of Accounts Receivable, for more information. On September 1, 2018, we amended certain terms of both our U.S. and Poland programs, disqualifying the sale of such receivables as sales of financial assets. As a result of the amendments, any future advances under the programs will be recorded as financing activities and recognized as debt on the consolidated balance sheets.
CONTINGENCIES
In the ordinary course of conducting our business, we become involved in litigation, administrative proceedings and governmental investigations, including environmental matters. We may incur settlements, fines, penalties or judgments because of some of these matters. Liabilities and costs associated with litigation-related loss contingencies require estimates and judgments based on our knowledge of the facts and circumstances surrounding each matter and the advice of our legal counsel. We record liabilities for litigation-related losses when a loss is probable and we can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. We evaluate the measurement of recorded liabilities each reporting period based on the current facts and circumstances specific to each matter. The ultimate losses incurred upon final resolution of litigation-related loss contingencies may differ materially from the estimated liability recorded at a particular balance sheet date. Changes in estimates are recorded in earnings in the period in which such changes occur. We do not believe that any currently pending legal proceedings to which we are a party will have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. See Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies, for more information.
Environmental and Other Matters
The information set forth in Note 18, Commitments and Contingencies, to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report is hereby incorporated by reference.
General
We are subject to federal, state and local pollution control laws and regulations in all locations where we have operating facilities. We anticipate that compliance with these laws and regulations will involve continuing capital expenditures and operating costs.
Metals recycling was our original business, and it has been one of our core businesses for over a century. In the present era of conservation of natural resources and ecological concerns, we are committed to sound ecological and business conduct. Certain governmental regulations regarding environmental concerns, however well-intentioned, may expose us and our industry to potentially significant risks. We believe that recycled materials are commodities that are diverted by recyclers, such as us, from the solid waste streams because of their inherent value. Commodities are materials that are purchased and sold in public and private markets and commodities exchanges every day around the world. They are identified, purchased, sorted, processed and sold in accordance with carefully established industry specifications.
38
Solid and Hazardous Waste
We currently own or lease, and in the past we have owned or leased, properties that have been used in our operations. Although we have used operating and disposal practices that were standard in the industry at the time, wastes may have been disposed of or released on or under the properties or on or under locations where such wastes have been taken for disposal. We are currently involved in the investigation and remediation of several such properties. State and federal laws applicable to wastes and contaminated properties have gradually become stricter over time. Under new laws, we could be required to remediate properties impacted by previously disposed wastes. We have been named as a potentially responsible party ("PRP") at a number of contaminated sites, none of which involve real estate we ever owned or upon which we have ever conducted operations. There is no guarantee that the EPA or individual states will not adopt more stringent requirements for the handling of, or make changes to the exemptions upon which we rely for, the wastes that we generate. Any such change could result in an increase in our costs to manage and dispose of waste which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of our operations and financial condition.
We generate wastes, including hazardous wastes, that are subject to the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and comparable state and local statutes where we operate. These statutes, regulations and laws may limit our disposal options with respect to certain wastes.
Superfund
The EPA, or an equivalent state agency, has notified us that we are considered a PRP at several sites, none of which involve real estate we ever owned or upon which we have ever conducted operations. We may be obligated under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), or similar state statutes, to conduct remedial investigation, feasibility studies, remediation and/or removal of alleged releases of hazardous substances or to reimburse the EPA for such activities and pay costs for associated damages to natural resources. We are involved in litigation or administrative proceedings with regard to several of these sites in which we are contesting, or at the appropriate time may contest, our liability. In addition, we have received information requests with regard to other sites which may be under consideration by the EPA as potential CERCLA sites. Because of various factors, including the ambiguity of the regulations, the difficulty of identifying the responsible parties for any particular site, the complexity of determining the relative liability among them, the uncertainty as to the most desirable remediation techniques and the amount of damages and cleanup costs and the extended time periods over which such costs may be incurred, we cannot reasonably estimate our ultimate costs of compliance with CERCLA. Based on currently available information, which is in many cases preliminary and incomplete, we had $0.7 million accrued as of August 31, 2018 and 2017 in connection with CERCLA sites. We have accrued for these liabilities based upon our best estimates. The amounts paid and the expenses incurred on these sites for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016 were not material. Historically, the amounts that we have ultimately paid for such remediation activities have not been material.
Clean Water Act
The Clean Water Act ("CWA") imposes restrictions and strict controls regarding the discharge of wastes into waters of the U.S., a term broadly defined, or into publicly owned treatment works. These controls have become more stringent over time, and it is probable that additional restrictions will be imposed in the future. Permits must generally be obtained to discharge pollutants into federal waters or into publicly owned treatment works and comparable permits may be required at the state level. The CWA and many state statutes provide for civil, criminal and administrative penalties for unauthorized discharges of pollutants. In addition, the EPA's regulations and comparable state statutes may require us to obtain permits to discharge storm water runoff. In the event of an unauthorized discharge or non-compliance with permit requirements, we may be liable for penalties and costs.
Clean Air Act
Our operations are subject to regulations at the federal, state and local level for the control of emissions from sources of air pollution. New and modified sources of air pollutants are often required to obtain permits prior to commencing construction, modification or operations. Major sources of air pollutants are subject to more stringent requirements, including the potential need for additional permits and to increase scrutiny in the context of enforcement. The EPA has been implementing its stationary emission control program through expanded enforcement of the New Source Review Program. Under this program, new or modified sources may be required to construct emission sources using what is referred to as the Best Available Control Technology, or in any areas that are not meeting NAAQS, using methods that satisfy requirements for the Lowest Achievable Emission Rate. Additionally, the EPA has implemented and is continuing to implement new, more stringent standards for NAAQS including fine particulate matter. Compliance with new standards could require additional expenditures.
39
We incurred environmental expenses of $32.0 million, $29.9 million and $33.9 million for fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The expenses included the cost of disposal, environmental personnel at various divisions, permit and license fees, accruals and payments for studies, tests, assessments, remediation, consultant fees, baghouse dust removal and various other expenses. In addition, during fiscal 2018, we spent approximately $7.5 million in capital expenditures related to costs directly associated with environmental compliance. Our accrued environmental liabilities were $4.0 million and $4.3 million as of August 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of which $1.9 million and $2.1 million were classified as other long-term liabilities as of August 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
DIVIDENDS
We have paid quarterly cash dividends in each of the past 216 consecutive quarters. We paid quarterly dividends in fiscal 2018 at the rate of $0.12 per share of CMC common stock.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The preceding discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent liabilities. We evaluate the appropriateness of these estimates and assumptions, including those related to the valuation allowances for receivables, the carrying value of inventory, long-lived assets and goodwill, reserves for litigation, environmental obligations and income taxes, on an ongoing basis. Estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Accordingly, actual results in future periods could differ materially from these estimates. Judgments and estimates related to critical accounting policies used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements include the following.
Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We recognize sales when title passes to the customer either when goods are shipped or when they are delivered based on the terms of the sale, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. When we estimate that a contract with one of our customers will result in a loss, we accrue the calculated loss as soon as it is probable and estimable. We account for certain fabrication projects based on the percentage of completion accounting method which is based primarily on contract cost incurred to date compared to total estimated contract cost. Contracts recognized on the percentage of completion accounting method can be significantly impacted by changes in contract performance, contract delays, and contract change orders, which may affect the revenue recognition on a project. Changes in revenue attributed to the changes in the estimated total contract cost, or loss, if any, are recognized in the period in which they are determined. It is possible that there will be future and currently unforeseeable adjustments to our estimated contract revenues, costs and margins. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect our estimate of the uncollectability of accounts receivable. These reserves are based on historical trends, current market conditions and customers' financial condition.
Income Taxes
We determine the income tax expense related to continuing operations to be the income tax consequences of amounts reported in continuing operations without regard to the income tax consequences of other components of the financial statements, such as other comprehensive income or discontinued operations. The amount of income tax expense or benefit to be allocated to the other components is the incremental effect that those pre-tax amounts have on the total income tax expense or benefit. If there is more than one financial statement component other than continuing operations, the allocation is made on a pro-rata basis in accordance with each component's incremental income tax effects.
We periodically assess the likelihood of realizing our deferred tax assets based on the amount of deferred tax assets that we believe is more likely than not to be realized. We base our judgment of the recoverability of our deferred tax assets primarily on historical earnings, our estimate of current and expected future earnings, prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, and current and future ownership changes.
Our effective income tax rate may fluctuate on a quarterly basis due to various factors, including, but not limited to, total earnings and the mix of earnings by jurisdiction, the timing of changes in tax laws, and the amount of income tax provided for uncertain income tax positions. We establish income tax liabilities to reduce some or all of the income tax benefit of any of our income tax positions at the time we determine that the positions become uncertain based upon one of the following: (i) the tax position is not "more likely than not" to be sustained, (ii) the tax position is "more likely than not" to be sustained, but for a lesser amount, or
40
(iii) the tax position is "more likely than not" to be sustained, but not in the financial period in which the tax position was originally taken. Our evaluation of whether or not a tax position is uncertain is based on the following: (i) we presume the tax position will be examined by the relevant taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information, (ii) the technical merits of a tax position are derived from authorities such as legislation and statutes, legislative intent, regulations, rulings and case law and their applicability to the facts and circumstances of the tax position, and (iii) each tax position is evaluated without considerations of the possibility of offset or aggregation with other tax positions taken. We adjust these income tax liabilities when our judgment changes as a result of new information. Any change will impact income tax expense in the period in which such determination is made.
The TCJA was signed into law in December 2017 and constitutes a major change to the U.S. tax system. The estimated impact of the law is based on management’s current interpretations of the TCJA and related assumptions. Our final tax liability may be materially different from current estimates based on regulatory developments and our further analysis of the impacts of the TCJA. In future periods, our effective tax rate could be subject to additional uncertainty as a result of regulatory developments related to TCJA.
Inventory Cost
We state inventories at the lower of cost or net realizable value, which is defined as estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. Adjustments to inventory may be due to changes in price levels, obsolescence, damage, physical deterioration, and other causes. Any adjustments required to reduce the carrying value of inventory to net realizable value are recorded as a charge to cost of goods sold.
Elements of cost in finished goods inventory in addition to the cost of material include depreciation, amortization, utilities, consumable production supplies, maintenance, production, wages and transportation costs. Additionally, the costs of departments that support production, including materials management and quality control, are allocated to inventory. Inventory cost is determined by the weighted average cost method.
Goodwill
Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level annually and whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
Our reporting units represent an operating segment or one level below an operating segment. Additionally, the reporting units are aggregated based on similar economic characteristics, nature of products and services, nature of production processes, type of customers and distribution methods. We use a discounted cash flow model and a market approach to calculate the fair value of our reporting units. The discounted cash flow model includes a number of significant assumptions and estimates regarding future cash flows including discount rates, volumes, prices, capital expenditures and the impact of current market conditions. These estimates could be materially impacted by adverse changes in market conditions.
As of August 31, 2018 and 2017, one of our reporting units within our Americas Fabrication segment comprised $51.1 million and $51.6 million, respectively, of our total goodwill. At August 31, 2018, based on the results of our annual testing, the fair value of this reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by 25.8%. For all other reporting units, the excess of the fair value over carrying value of each reporting unit was substantial. The future occurrence of a potential indicator of impairment could include matters such as: a decrease in expected net earnings, adverse equity market conditions, a decline in current market multiples, a decline in our common stock price, a significant adverse change in legal factors or the general business climate, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, a significant downturn in non-residential construction markets in the U.S., and elevated levels of imported steel into the U.S. In the event of significant adverse changes of the nature described above, it may be necessary for us to recognize a non-cash impairment of goodwill, which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, the assumptions that have the most significant impact on determination of the Americas Fabrication reporting segment fair value are the estimates of gross margin expansion, value of the terminal year, and the weighted average cost of capital (discount rate). A change in any of these assumptions, individually or in the aggregate, or future financial performance that is below management's expectations may result in a goodwill impairment charge.
For fiscal 2018, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $0.5 million related to a reporting unit in our Americas Fabrication segment as a result of the sale of our structural steel fabrication assets. The annual goodwill impairment analysis did not result in any impairment charges for fiscal 2018. For fiscal 2017, the annual goodwill impairment analysis resulted in an impairment charge of $2.0 million related to a reporting unit that was classified as discontinued operations.
See Note 7, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, for additional information.
41
Long-Lived Assets
We evaluate the carrying value of property, plant and equipment and finite-lived intangible assets whenever a change in circumstances indicates that the carrying value may not be recoverable from the undiscounted future cash flows from operations. Events or circumstances that could trigger an impairment review of a long-lived asset or asset group include, but are not limited to, a significant decrease in the market price of the asset, a significant adverse change in the extent or manner that the asset is used or in its physical condition, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of the asset, an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of original expectation for the acquisition or construction of the asset, a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a forecast of continuing losses associated with the use of the asset, and a more-likely-than-not expectation that the asset will be sold or disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. If an impairment exists, the net book values are reduced to fair values. Our U.S. and international steel mills, fabrication and recycling businesses are capital intensive. Some of the estimated values for assets that we currently use in our operations are based upon judgments and assumptions of future undiscounted cash flows that the assets will produce. If these assets were for sale, our estimates of their values could be significantly different because of market conditions, specific transaction terms and a buyer's different viewpoint of future cash flows. Also, we depreciate property, plant and equipment on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Depreciable lives are based on our estimate of the assets' economical useful lives. To the extent that an asset's actual life differs from our estimate, there could be an impact on depreciation expense or a gain/loss on the disposal of the asset in a later period. We expense major maintenance costs as incurred.
Due to adverse margin and volume pressure in our Americas Recycling segment, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, management concluded that a triggering event had occurred. The results of the undiscounted future cash flow analysis indicated that the carrying amounts for certain long-lived asset groups were not expected to be recovered. Fair value for these long-lived asset groups was then estimated and compared to the carrying values of the long-lived asset groups, which resulted in a total non-cash, pre-tax impairment of $38.9 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.
Contingencies
In the ordinary course of conducting our business, we become involved in litigation, administrative proceedings and governmental investigations, including environmental matters. We may incur settlements, fines, penalties or judgments in connection with some of these matters. While we are unable to estimate the ultimate dollar amount of exposure or loss in connection with these matters, we make accruals when a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The amounts we accrue could vary substantially from amounts we pay due to several factors including the following: evolving remediation technology, changing regulations, possible third-party contributions, the inherent shortcomings of the estimation process, and the uncertainties involved in litigation. We believe that we have adequately provided for these contingencies in our consolidated financial statements. We also believe that the outcomes will not materially affect our results of operations, our financial position or our cash flows.
Other Accounting Policies and New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, which is incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risk
Approach to Mitigating Market Risk
See Note 12, Derivatives and Risk Management, for disclosure regarding our approach to mitigating market risk and for summarized market risk information by fiscal year. Also, see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for additional information. We utilized the following types of derivative instruments during fiscal 2018 in accordance with our risk management program. All of the instruments are highly liquid and were not entered into for trading purposes.
Currency Exchange Forward Contracts
We enter into currency exchange forward contracts as economic hedges of trade commitments denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of CMC or its subsidiaries. No single foreign currency poses a material risk to us. Fluctuations that cause temporary disruptions in one market segment tend to open opportunities in other segments.
42
Commodity Futures Contracts
We base pricing in some of our sales and purchase contracts on metal commodity futures exchange quotes, which we determine at the beginning of the contract. Due to the volatility of the metal commodity indices, we enter into metal commodity futures contracts for copper and aluminum. These futures contracts mitigate the risk of unanticipated declines in gross margin due to the price volatility of the underlying commodities. Physical transaction quantities will not match exactly with standard commodity lot sizes, leading to minimal gains and losses from ineffectiveness.
The following tables provide certain information regarding the foreign exchange forward contracts and commodity futures contracts discussed above.
Gross foreign currency exchange forward contract commitments as of August 31, 2018:
Functional Currency | Foreign Currency | ||||||||||||||||
Type | Amount (in thousands) | Type | Amount (in thousands) | Range of Hedge Rates (1) | U.S. Equivalent (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
PLN | 329,123 | EUR | 76,232 | 4.19 | — | 4.44 | $ | 89,988 | |||||||||
PLN | 3,612 | USD | 1,009 | 3.40 | — | 3.71 | 1,009 | ||||||||||
USD | 28,485 | AUD | 38,500 | 0.74 | 28,485 | ||||||||||||
$ | 119,482 | ||||||||||||||||
_________________
(1) All foreign currency exchange forward contracts mature within one year. The range of hedge rates represents functional to foreign currency conversion rates.
Commodity futures contract commitments as of August 31, 2018:
Terminal Exchange | Metal | Long/ Short | # of Lots | Standard Lot Size | Total Weight | Range or Amount of Hedge Rates Per MT/lb. (1) | Total Contract Value at Inception (in thousands) | |||||||||||||
London Metal Exchange | Aluminum | Long | 159 | 25 MT | 3,975 MT | 2,027.50 | — | 2,170.00 | $ | 8,308 | ||||||||||
Aluminum | Short | 22 | 25 MT | 550 MT | 2,037.00 | — | 2,159.00 | 1,179 | ||||||||||||
New York Mercantile Exchange | Copper | Long | 144 | 25,000 lbs. | 3,600,000 lbs. | 262.05 | — | 328.90 | 9,857 | |||||||||||
Copper | Short | 513 | 25,000 lbs. | 12,825,000 lbs. | 257.75 | — | 334.35 | 35,902 | ||||||||||||
$ | 55,246 | |||||||||||||||||||
_________________
MT = Metric ton
(1) All commodity futures contract commitments mature within one year.
43
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by or under the supervision of a company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework 2013 issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of August 31, 2018. Deloitte & Touche LLP has audited the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting; their attestation report is included on page 45 of this Annual Report.
44
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Commercial Metals Company
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Commercial Metals Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of August 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended August 31, 2018, of the Company and our report dated October 25, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Dallas, Texas
October 25, 2018
45
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Commercial Metals Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Commercial Metals Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of August 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2018, and the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of August 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated October 25, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Dallas, Texas
October 25, 2018
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1959.
46
COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS | ||||||||||||
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||
Net sales | $ | 4,643,723 | $ | 3,844,069 | $ | 3,596,068 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 4,021,558 | 3,322,711 | 3,021,862 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 401,452 | 387,354 | 383,748 | |||||||||
Loss on debt extinguishment | — | 22,672 | 11,480 | |||||||||
Impairment of assets | 14,372 | 1,730 | 40,028 | |||||||||
Interest expense | 40,957 | 44,151 | 62,973 | |||||||||
4,478,339 | 3,778,618 | 3,520,091 | ||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes | 165,384 | 65,451 | 75,977 | |||||||||
Income taxes | 30,147 | 15,276 | 13,976 | |||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | 135,237 | 50,175 | 62,001 | |||||||||
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes | 3,235 | (9,840 | ) | (8,736 | ) | |||||||
Income taxes (benefit) | (34 | ) | (5,997 | ) | (1,497 | ) | ||||||
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | 3,269 | (3,843 | ) | (7,239 | ) | |||||||
Net earnings | $ | 138,506 | $ | 46,332 | $ | 54,762 | ||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share* | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | $ | 1.16 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.54 | ||||||
Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations | 0.03 | (0.03 | ) | (0.06 | ) | |||||||
Net earnings | $ | 1.19 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.48 | ||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share* | ||||||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations | $ | |||||||||||