Edgar Filing: EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORP

EMMS 10K-2014

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)



ý	Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2014



¨	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the Transition Period from to .

EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

INDIANA

(State of incorporation or organization)

0-23264

(Commission file number)

35-1542018

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

ONE EMMIS PLAZA

40 MONUMENT CIRCLE

SUITE 700

INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204

(Address of principal executive offices)

(317) 266-0100

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: None

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT: Class A common stock, $.01 par value of Emmis Communications Corporation; 6.25% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $.01 par value of Emmis Communications Corporation.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

Table of Contents

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” and “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	ý

Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No ý

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of August 31, 2013, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $100,517,000.

The number of shares outstanding of each of Emmis Communications Corporation’s classes of common stock, as of May 2, 2014, was:

38,480,820 Class A Common Shares, $.01 par value

4,569,464 Class B Common Shares, $.01 par value

0 Class C Common Shares, $.01 par value

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE



Documents		Form 10-K Reference
Proxy Statement for 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders expected to be filed within 120 days		Part III

Table of Contents

EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS



	Page
PART I	5
Item 1. Business	5
Item 1A. Risk Factors	15
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments	21
Item 2. Properties	21
Item 3. Legal Proceedings	21
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	22

PART II	22
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	22
Item 6. Selected Financial Data	24
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	41
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	44
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	46
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	92
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures	92
Item 9B. Other Information	94

PART III	95
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	95
Item 11. Executive Compensation	95
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, and Management, and Related Stockholder Matters	95
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	95
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services	96

PART IV	96
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	96

Signatures	100

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report includes or incorporates forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. You can identify these forward-looking statements by our use of words such as “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “project,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “continue,” “potential,” “opportunity” and similar expressions, whether in the negative or affirmative. We cannot guarantee that we will achieve these plans, intentions or expectations. All statements regarding our expected financial position, business and financing plans are forward-looking statements.

Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. We have included important facts in various cautionary statements in this report that we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements that we make. These include, but are not limited to, the factors described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”

The forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers or dispositions. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements because of new information, future events or otherwise.

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

GENERAL

We are a diversified media company, principally focused on radio broadcasting. We operate the 9^th largest radio portfolio in the United States based on total listeners. Emmis owns 18 FM and 3 AM radio stations in New York, Los Angeles, St. Louis, Austin (Emmis has a 50.1% controlling interest in Emmis’ radio stations located there), Indianapolis and Terre Haute, IN and operates two additional stations in New York (one FM and one AM) pursuant to a Local Marketing Agreement (“LMA”) whereby Emmis provides the programming for these stations and sells all advertising within that programming pending its acquisition of the stations. In addition, one of the FM radio stations that Emmis currently owns in New York is operated pursuant to an LMA by a third party.

In addition to our radio properties, we publish several city and regional magazines. Our publishing operations consist of Texas Monthly, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Indianapolis Monthly, Cincinnati, and Orange Coast.

BUSINESS STRATEGY

We are committed to improving the operating results of our core assets while simultaneously seeking future growth opportunities in related businesses. Our strategy is focused on the following operating principles:

Develop unique and compelling content and strong local brands

Most of our established local media brands have achieved and sustained a leading position in their respective market segments over many years. Knowledge of local markets and consistently producing unique and compelling content that meets the needs of our target audiences are critical to our success. As such, we make substantial investments in areas such as market research, data analysis and creative talent to ensure that our content remains relevant, has a meaningful impact on the communities we serve and reinforces the core brand image of each respective property.

Extend the reach and relevance of our local brands through digital platforms

In recent years, we have placed substantial emphasis on enhancing the distribution of our content through digital platforms, such as the Internet and mobile phones. We believe these digital platforms offer excellent opportunities to further enhance the relationships we have with our audiences by allowing them to consume and share our content in new ways and providing us with new distribution channels for one-to-one communication with them.

Deliver results to advertisers

Competition for advertising revenue is intense and becoming more so. To remain competitive, we focus on sustaining and growing our audiences, optimizing our pricing strategy and developing innovative marketing programs for our clients that allow them to interact with our audiences in more direct and measurable ways. These programs often include elements such as on-air endorsements, events, contests, special promotions, Internet advertising, email marketing, text messaging and online video. Our ability to deploy multi-touchpoint marketing programs allows us to deliver a stronger return-on-investment for our clients while simultaneously generating ancillary revenue streams for our media properties.

Extend sales efforts into new market segments

Given the competitive pressures in many of our “traditional” advertising categories, we are expanding our network of advertiser relationships into not-for-profits, political advertising, corporate philanthropy, environmental initiatives and government agencies. We believe our capabilities can address these clients’ under-served needs. The early return on these efforts has been encouraging and we plan to shift additional resources toward these efforts over time.

Enhance the efficiency of our operations

We believe it is essential that we operate our businesses as efficiently as possible. In response to the 2008 economic recession, we implemented a series of aggressive restructurings and cost cuts. More recently, we have been investing in common technology platforms across all of our radio and publishing entities to help standardize our business processes.

Effectively deploy technology to enhance the value of our media assets

We continue to seek innovative ways to combine or enhance our scalable, low cost FM radio distribution system with digital systems like HD Radio^® and wireless broadband to enhance radio’s future through advances like TagStation^®, a cloud-based software platform that allows a broadcaster to manage album art, meta data and enhanced advertising on its various broadcasts, and NextRadio^®, a hybrid radio smartphone application, as an industry solution to make the user experience of listening to free over-the-air radio broadcasts on their enabled smartphones a rich experience.

Table of Contents

RADIO STATIONS

In the following table, “Market Rank by Revenue” is the ranking of the market revenue size of the principal radio market served by our stations among all radio markets in the United States. Market revenue rankings are from BIA/Kelsey’s Media Access Pro database as of March 26, 2014. “Ranking in Primary Demographic Target” is the ranking of the station within its designated primary demographic target among all radio stations in its market based on the January 2014 Portable People Meter^™ (PPM^™) results or, in the case of our Terre Haute stations, based on the Fall 2013 Nielsen Survey. A “t” indicates the station tied with another station for the stated ranking. “Station Audience Share” represents a percentage generally computed by dividing the average number of persons in the primary demographic listening to a particular station during specified time periods by the average number of such persons in the primary demographic for all stations in the market area as determined by Nielsen.



STATION AND MARKET	MARKET RANK BY REVENUE	FORMAT	PRIMARY DEMOGRAPHIC TARGET AGES	RANKING IN PRIMARY DEMOGRAPHIC TARGET	STATION AUDIENCE SHARE
Los Angeles, CA	1
KPWR-FM		Hip-Hop	18-34	1	8.4
New York, NY ¹	2
WQHT-FM		Hip-Hop	18-34	3	7.1
St. Louis, MO	20
KPNT-FM		Alternative Rock	18-34	5	8.6
KSHE-FM		Album Oriented Rock	25-54	4	6.6
KIHT-FM		Classic Hits	25-54	13	4.4
KFTK-FM		Talk	25-54	15t	3.0
Austin, TX	33
KLBJ-AM		News/Talk	25-54	14	3.1
KLZT-FM		Mexican Regional	18-34	6	5.7
KBPA-FM		Adult Hits	25-54	1	11.4
KLBJ-FM		Album Oriented Rock	25-54	7	4.7
KGSR-FM		Adult Album Alternative	25-54	13	3.4
KROX-FM		Alternative Rock	18-34	3	7.8
Indianapolis, IN	38
WFNI-AM		Sports Talk	25-54	19t	1.6
WYXB-FM		Soft Adult Contemporary	25-54	1	7.7
WLHK-FM		Country	25-54	8	5.4
WIBC-FM		News/Talk	35-64	3	7.1
Terre Haute, IN	227
WTHI-FM		Country	25-54	1	14.7
WFNF-AM		Sports Talk	25-54	11	0.9
WFNB-FM		Adult Hits	25-54	6	5.5
WWVR-FM		Classic Rock	25-54	4	9.2

¹ Our second owned station in New York, WEPN-FM, is operating pursuant to an LMA. Under the terms of the LMA, New York AM Radio LLC, a subsidiary of Disney Enterprises, Inc., provides the programming for the station and sells all advertising within that programming. Emmis continues to own and operate WEPN-FM.

Table of Contents

closing is scheduled to occur on or about February 15, 2015, and will involve the payment of the balance of the purchase price to YMF ($76 million) in exchange for the transfer to Emmis of YMF’s interest in the Emmis subsidiaries that own the Stations’ assets. The Purchase and Sale Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities, including liquidated damages in the amount of ten percent of the purchase price and specific performance remedies that may be asserted by either Emmis or YMF.

On February 11, 2014, Emmis entered into an LMA with YMF to program the Stations. The LMA did not commence until March 1, 2014.

In addition to our other radio broadcasting operations, we own and operate Network Indiana, a radio network that provides news and other programming to 90 affiliated radio stations in Indiana.

PUBLISHING OPERATIONS

We publish the following magazines:



	Monthly
	Paid & Verified Circulation¹
Texas Monthly	300,945
Los Angeles	141,000
Atlanta	68,280
Orange Coast	47,060
Indianapolis Monthly	39,280
Cincinnati	33,960

¹ Source: Publisher’s Statement subject to audit by the Alliance for Audited Media or Circulation Verification Council (as of December 31, 2013)

INTERNET AND NEW TECHNOLOGIES

We believe that the growth of the Internet and other new technologies present not only a challenge, but an opportunity for broadcasters and publishers. The primary challenge is increased competition for the time and attention of our listeners and readers. The opportunity is to further enhance the relationships we already have with our listeners and readers by expanding products and services offered by our stations and magazines.

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

We believe that to be successful, we must be integrally involved in the communities we serve. We see ourselves as community partners. To that end, each of our stations and magazines participates in many community programs, fundraisers and activities that benefit a wide variety of organizations. Charitable organizations that have been the beneficiaries of our contributions, marathons, walkathons, dance-a-thons, concerts, fairs and festivals include, among others, Big Brothers/Big Sisters, Coalition for the Homeless, Indiana Black Expo, the Children’s Wish Fund, the National Multiple Sclerosis Foundation and Special Olympics. The National Association of Broadcasters Education Foundation (“NABEF”) has honored us with the Hubbard Award, honoring a broadcaster “for extraordinary involvement in serving the community.” Emmis was the second broadcaster to receive this prestigious honor, after the Hubbard family, for which the award is named. The NABEF also recently recognized Emmis’ WQHT-FM in New York for its outreach after Hurricane Sandy, both for the news coverage it provided and the relief efforts it organized in the weeks after the storm.

INDUSTRY INVOLVEMENT

We have an active leadership role in a wide range of industry organizations. Our senior managers have served in various capacities with industry associations, including as directors of the National Association of Broadcasters, the Radio Advertising Bureau, the Radio Futures Committee, the Nielsen Audio Advisory Council, the Media Financial Management Association, MPA - the Association of Magazine Media, the City and Regional Magazine Association and as founding members of the Radio Operators Caucus and Magazine Publishers of America. Our chief executive officer has been honored with the National Association of Broadcasters’ “National Radio Award” and as Radio Ink’s “Radio Executive of the Year.” Our management and on-air personalities have won numerous industry awards.

COMPETITION

Radio broadcasting stations compete with the other broadcasting stations in their respective market areas, as well as with other advertising media such as newspapers, cable, magazines, outdoor advertising, transit advertising, the Internet, satellite radio and direct marketing. Competition within the broadcasting industry occurs primarily in individual market areas, so that a station in one market (e.g., New York) does not generally compete with stations in other markets (e.g., Los Angeles). In each of

Table of Contents

our markets, our stations face competition from other stations with substantial financial resources, including stations targeting the same demographic groups. In addition to management experience, factors that are material to competitive position include the station’s rank in its market in terms of the number of listeners, authorized power, assigned frequency, audience characteristics, local program acceptance and the number and characteristics of other stations in the market area. We attempt to improve our competitive position with programming and promotional campaigns aimed at the demographic groups targeted by our stations. We also seek to improve our position through sales efforts designed to attract advertisers that have done little or no radio advertising by emphasizing the effectiveness of radio advertising in increasing the advertisers’ revenues. The policies and rules of the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) permit certain joint ownership and joint operation of local stations. Most of our radio stations take advantage of these joint arrangements in an effort to lower operating costs and to offer advertisers more attractive rates and services. Although we believe that each of our stations can compete effectively in its market, there can be no assurance that any of our stations will be able to maintain or increase its current audience ratings or advertising revenue market share.

Although the broadcasting industry is highly competitive, barriers to entry exist. The operation of a broadcasting station in the United States requires a license from the FCC. Also, the number of stations that can operate in a given market is limited by the availability of the frequencies that the FCC will license in that market, as well as by the FCC’s multiple ownership rules regulating the number of stations that may be owned and controlled by a single entity and cross ownership rules which limit the types of media properties in any given market that can be owned by the same person or company.

ADVERTISING SALES

Our stations and magazines derive their advertising revenue from local and regional advertising in the marketplaces in which they operate, as well as from the sale of national advertising. Local and most regional sales are made by a station’s or magazine’s sales staff. National sales are made by firms specializing in such sales, which are compensated on a commission-only basis. We believe that the volume of national advertising revenue tends to adjust to shifts in a station’s audience share position more rapidly than does the volume of local and regional advertising revenue. During the year ended February 28, 2014, approximately 23% of our total advertising revenues were derived from national sales, and 77% were derived from local sales. For the year ended February 28, 2014, our radio stations derived a higher percentage of their advertising revenues from local and regional sales (81%) than our publishing entities (66%).

EMPLOYEES

As of February 28, 2014, Emmis had approximately 720 full-time employees and approximately 280 part-time employees. Approximately 20 employees are represented by unions at our various radio stations. We consider relations with our employees to be good.

INTERNET ADDRESS AND INTERNET ACCESS TO SEC REPORTS

Our Internet address is www.emmis.com. Through our Internet website, free of charge, you may obtain copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. These reports will be available the same day we electronically file such material with, or furnish such material to, the SEC. We have been making such reports available on the same day they are filed during the period covered by this report.

FEDERAL REGULATION OF BROADCASTING

Radio broadcasting in the United States is subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC under the Communications Act of 1934 (the “Communications Act”), as amended in part by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the “1996 Act”). Radio broadcasting is prohibited except in accordance with a license issued by the FCC upon a finding that the public interest, convenience and necessity would be served by the grant of such license. The FCC has the power to revoke licenses for, among other things, false statements made in applications or willful or repeated violations of the Communications Act or of FCC rules. In general, the Communications Act provides that the FCC shall allocate broadcast licenses for radio stations in such a manner as will provide a fair, efficient and equitable distribution of service throughout the United States. The FCC determines the operating frequency, location and power of stations; regulates the equipment used by stations; and regulates numerous other areas of radio broadcasting pursuant to rules, regulations and policies adopted under authority of the Communications Act. The Communications Act, among other things, prohibits the assignment of a broadcast license or the transfer of control of an entity holding such a license without the prior approval of the FCC. Under the Communications Act, the FCC also regulates certain aspects of media that compete with broadcast stations.

The following is a brief summary of certain provisions of the Communications Act and of specific FCC regulations and policies. Reference should be made to the Communications Act as well as FCC rules, public notices and rulings for further information concerning the nature and extent of federal regulation of radio stations. Other legislation has been introduced from time to time which would amend the Communications Act in various respects, and the FCC from time to time considers new regulations or amendments to its existing regulations. We cannot predict whether any such legislation will be enacted or whether

Table of Contents

new or amended FCC regulations will be adopted or what their effect would be on Emmis.

LICENSE RENEWAL. Radio stations operate pursuant to broadcast licenses that are ordinarily granted by the FCC for maximum terms of eight years and are subject to renewal upon approval by the FCC. The following table sets forth our FCC license expiration dates in addition to the call letters, license classification, antenna elevation above average terrain (for our FM stations only), power and frequency of all owned stations as of April 30, 2014:

Expiration Date

of License¹

Height Above

Average

Terrain (in feet)

Power (in Kilowatts)

Radio Market

Stations

City of License

Frequency

FCC Class

Los Angeles, CA

KPWR-FM

Los Angeles, CA

105.9

December 2021

3,035

New York, NY

WQHT-FM

New York, NY

97.1

June 2014

1,339

6.7

WEPN-FM

New York, NY

98.7

June 2014

1,362

St. Louis, MO

KFTK-FM

Florissant, MO

97.1

February 2021

561

100

KIHT-FM

St. Louis, MO

96.3

February 2021

1,027

KPNT-FM

Collinsville, IL

105.7

December 2004

^2, 3

835

KSHE-FM

Crestwood, MO

94.7

February 2021

1,027

100

Austin, TX

KBPA-FM

San Marcos, TX

103.5

August 2013

1,257

100

KGSR-FM

Cedar Park, TX

93.3

August 2021

1,926

100

KLZT-FM

Bastrop, TX

107.1

August 2013

499

KLBJ-AM

Austin, TX

590

August 2013

N/A

5 D / 1 N

KLBJ-FM

Austin, TX

93.7

August 2013

1,050

KROX-FM

Buda, TX

101.5

August 2013

847

12.5

Indianapolis, IN

WFNI-AM

Indianapolis, IN

1070

August 2020

N/A

50 D / 10 N

WLHK-FM

Shelbyville, IN

97.1

August 2020

732

WIBC-FM

Indianapolis, IN

93.1

August 2004

991

13.5

WYXB-FM

Indianapolis, IN

105.7

August 2020

492

Terre Haute, IN

WTHI-FM

Terre Haute, IN

99.9

August 2020

489

WWVR-FM

West Terre Haute, IN

105.5

August 2020

295

3.3

WFNB-FM

Brazil, IN

92.7

August 2020

299

WFNF-AM

Brazil, IN

1130

August 2020

N/A

0.5 D / 0.02 N

¹ Under the Communications Act, a license expiration date is extended automatically pending action on the renewal application.

² Renewal application is pending.

³ The FCC has authorized changes in technical facilities for KPNT-FM at a new transmitter site as follows: FCC Class, C1; Height Above Average Terrain, 715 ft; and Effective Radiated Power, 64 kW. The station is authorized to continue operation with its existing facilities until the new facilities are constructed. The KPNT-FM changes require change of the city of license of station KSEF-FM from Farmington, MO to St. Genevieve, MO, which the FCC has approved.

Under the Communications Act, at the time an application is filed for renewal of a station license, parties in interest, as well as members of the public, may apprise the FCC of the service the station has provided during the preceding license term and urge the denial of the application. If such a petition to deny presents information from which the FCC concludes (or if the FCC concludes on its own motion) that there is a “substantial and material” question as to whether grant of the renewal application would be in the public interest under applicable rules and policy, the FCC may conduct a hearing on specified issues to determine whether the renewal application should be granted. The Communications Act provides for the grant of a renewal application upon a finding by the FCC that the licensee:


•	has served the public interest, convenience and necessity;


•	has committed no serious violations of the Communications Act or the FCC rules; and


•	has committed no other violations of the Communications Act or the FCC rules which would constitute a pattern of abuse.

If the FCC cannot make such a finding, it may deny the renewal application, and only then may the FCC consider competing applications for the same frequency. In a vast majority of cases, the FCC renews a broadcast license even when petitions to deny have been filed against the renewal application.

Petitions to deny were filed against the renewal applications for KPNT submitted in 2004 and 2012, and remain pending. An informal objection was filed against the renewal applications of the Company’s Indiana radio stations and was rejected by the FCC, and the licenses of all the Indiana radio stations except WIBC were renewed. Both a petition for reconsideration, and later an application for review, related to the grant of those Indiana license renewals were filed, and both were rejected. A

Table of Contents

petition for reconsideration of the decision denying the application review to the Indiana license renewal applications was subsequently filed, and remains pending. See “PROGRAMMING AND OPERATION.”

REVIEW OF OWNERSHIP RESTRICTIONS. The FCC is required by statute to review all of its broadcast ownership rules on a quadrennial basis (i.e., every four years) and to repeal or modify any of its rules that are no longer “necessary in the public interest.”

Despite several such reviews and appellate remands, the FCC’s rules limiting the number of radio stations that may be commonly owned, or owned in combination with a television station, in a local market have remained largely intact. The most recent FCC quadrennial review decision was appealed by a number of parties (not including Emmis). The Third Circuit issued a decision in July 2011 which upheld the FCC’s decisions regarding all of its rules except for a revised newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership rule, which the Court vacated and remanded to the Commission based on the Court’s finding that the agency had failed to provide adequate notice and opportunity for comment on the changes to that rule. The Supreme Court denied petitions for certiorari of the Third Circuit’s decision in June 2012. Several parties jointly filed a petition for reconsideration of the December 2007 decision with the FCC, and that petition remains pending. In 2010, the FCC again commenced a quadrennial review of its broadcast ownership rules, which it subsequently incorporated into the record of 2104 quadrennial review launched in April 2014. Both the 2010 and 2014 quadrennial reviews remain pending, and we cannot predict whether these proceedings will result in modifications of the ownership rules or the impact (if any) that such modifications would have on our business.

The discussion below reviews the pertinent ownership rules currently in effect as well as the changes in the newspaper/broadcast rule adopted in the FCC’s December 2007 decision, which the FCC has largely proposed to reinstate in its 2010 and 2014 quadrennial reviews.

Local Radio Ownership:

The local radio ownership rule limits the number of commercial radio stations that may be owned by one entity in a given radio market based on the number of radio stations in that market:


•	if the market has 45 or more radio stations, one entity may own up to eight stations, not more than five of which may be in the same service (AM or FM);


•	if the market has between 30 and 44 radio stations, one entity may own up to seven stations, not more than four of which may be in the same service;


•	if the market has between 15 and 29 radio stations, one entity may own up to six stations, not more than four of which may be in the same service; and


•	if the market has 14 or fewer radio stations, one entity may own up to five stations, not more than three of which may be in the same service, however one entity may not own more than 50% of the stations in the market.

Each of the markets in which our radio stations are located has at least 15 radio stations.

For purposes of applying these numerical limits, the FCC has also adopted rules with respect to (i) so-called local marketing agreements, or “LMAs,” by which the licensee of one radio station provides programming for another licensee’s radio station in the same market and sells all of the advertising within that programming and (ii) so-called joint sale agreements, or “JSAs,” by which the licensee of one station sells the advertising time on another station in the market. Under these rules, an entity that owns one or more radio stations in a market and programs more than 15% of the broadcast time, or sells more than 15% of the advertising time, on another radio station in the same market pursuant to an LMA or JSA is generally required to count the station toward its media ownership limits even though it does not own the station. As a result, in a market where we own one or more radio stations, we generally cannot provide programming to another station under an LMA, or sell advertising on another station pursuant to a JSA, if we could not acquire that station under the local radio ownership rule. In its most recent quadrennial review, the FCC has also sought comment on whether to expand the categories of agreements that are considered for purposes of evaluating compliance with the ownership rules to include agreements such as “shared services agreements” and/or “local news service” agreements.

On April 26, 2012, a subsidiary of Emmis entered into an LMA with New York AM Radio, LLC pursuant to which, commencing April 30, 2012, it began purchasing from Emmis the right to provide programming on radio station WRKS-FM (now WEPN-FM), 98.7FM, New York, NY until August 31, 2024, subject to certain conditions. Disney Enterprises, Inc., the parent company of New York AM Radio, LLC, has guaranteed the obligations under the LMA. Emmis’ subsidiary will retain ownership of the 98.7FM FCC license during the term of the LMA and will receive an annual fee of $8.4 million for the first year of the term under the LMA, which fee will increase by 3.5% each year thereafter until the LMA’s termination.

Although the FCC’s quadrennial review decisions have not changed the numerical caps under the local radio rule, the FCC adjusted the rule in June 2003 by deciding that both commercial and noncommercial stations could be counted in determining the number of stations in a radio market. The decision also altered the definition of the relevant local market for

Table of Contents

purposes of the rule. The FCC “grandfathered” existing station “clusters” not in compliance with the numerical caps as calculated pursuant to the new market definition, but provided that they could be sold intact only to small businesses meeting certain requirements. In December 2007, the FCC expanded this policy to allow an owner to sell a grandfathered station cluster to any buyer, so long as the buyer committed to file, within 12 months, an application with the FCC to transfer the excess station(s) to an eligible small business or to a trust for ultimate sale to such an entity. Subsequently, however, the Third Circuit vacated the FCC’s selected definition of small businesses eligible to purchase clusters that exceed the numerical limits. The change in market definition appears to impact the Austin, Texas market, such that we exceed the numerical cap for FM stations. If we chose to sell our Austin cluster of stations, we would therefore have to “spin off” one FM station to a separate buyer. The FCC has proposed to retain intact its local radio ownership rule, and has sought comment on alternatives to its previous definition of eligible small businesses, in its most recent quadrennial reviews.

Cross-Media Ownership:

The FCC’s radio/television cross-ownership rule generally permits the common ownership of the following combinations in the same market, to the extent permitted under the FCC’s television duopoly rule and local radio rules:


•	up to two commercial television stations and six commercial radio stations or one commercial television station and seven commercial radio stations in a market where at least 20 independent media voices will remain post-merger;


•	up to two commercial television stations and four commercial radio stations in a market where at least 10 independent media voices will remain post-merger; and


•	two commercial television stations and one commercial radio station in a market with less than 10 independent media voices that will remain post-merger.

For purposes of this rule, the FCC counts as “voices” commercial and non-commercial broadcast television and radio stations as well as some daily newspapers and no more than one cable operator. The FCC will consider permanent waivers of its revised radio/television cross-ownership rule only if one of the stations is a “failed station.” The FCC has proposed to eliminate this rule in its most recent quadrennial reviews.

FCC rules also generally prohibit common ownership of a daily newspaper and a radio or television station in the same local market. In its December 2007 quadrennial review decision, the FCC adopted rules that contained a presumption in favor of allowing ownership of one television or radio station in combination with one daily newspaper in the 20 largest media markets. In smaller markets, there would have been a presumption against allowing such ownership. In the case of proposed TV/newspaper combinations, the TV station could not be among the top four ranked stations in its market, and at least eight independently owned and operated TV stations would have had to remain in the market post-transaction. As noted above, the Third Circuit vacated these changes to the newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership ban on procedural grounds. The FCC has largely proposed to reinstate the standards applicable to proposed newspaper/TV combinations in its most recent quadrennial reviews, while at the same time seeking comment on whether to eliminate the newspaper/radio cross-ownership rule.

ALIEN OWNERSHIP. Under the Communications Act, no FCC license may be held by a corporation if more than one-fifth of its capital stock is owned or voted by aliens or their representatives, a foreign government or representative thereof, or an entity organized under the laws of a foreign country (collectively, “Non-U.S. Persons”). Furthermore, the Communications Act provides that no FCC license may be granted to an entity directly or indirectly controlled by another entity of which more than one-fourth of its capital stock is owned or voted by Non-U.S. Persons if the FCC finds that the public interest will be served by the denial of such license. The FCC staff has interpreted this provision to require an affirmative public interest finding to permit the grant or holding of a license, and such a finding has been made only in limited circumstances. In November 2013 the FCC clarified that it would accept requests to allow foreign investment above 25% in broadcast stations, and that it would evaluate those requests on a case-by-case basis to determine whether the requesting party had provided a sufficient public interest showing. The foregoing restrictions on alien ownership apply in modified form to other types of business organizations, including partnerships and limited liability companies. An LMA with a foreign owned company is not prohibited as long as the non-foreign holder of the FCC license continues to control and operate the station. Our Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Code of By-Laws authorize the Board of Directors to prohibit such restricted alien ownership, voting or transfer of capital stock as would cause Emmis to violate the Communications Act or FCC regulations.

ATTRIBUTION OF OWNERSHIP INTERESTS. In applying its ownership rules, the FCC has developed specific criteria that it uses to determine whether a certain ownership interest or other relationship with an FCC licensee is significant enough to be “attributable” or “cognizable” under its rules. Specifically, among other relationships, certain stockholders, officers and directors of a broadcasting company are deemed to have an attributable interest in the licenses held by that company, such that there would be a violation of the FCC’s rules where the broadcasting company and such a stockholder, officer or director together hold attributable interests in more than the permitted number of stations or a prohibited combination of outlets in the same market. The FCC’s regulations generally deem the following relationships and interests to be attributable for purposes of its ownership restrictions:

Table of Contents


•	all officer and director positions in a licensee or its direct/indirect parent(s);


•	voting stock interests of at least 5% (or 20%, if the holder is a passive institutional investor, i.e., a mutual fund, insurance company or bank);


•	any equity interest in a limited partnership or limited liability company where the limited partner or member has not been “insulated” from the media-related activities of the LP or LLC pursuant to specific FCC criteria;

•

equity and/or debt interests which, in the aggregate, exceed 33% of the total asset value of a station or other media entity (the “equity/debt plus policy”), if the interest holder supplies more than 15% of the station’s total weekly programming (usually pursuant to a time brokerage, local marketing or network affiliation agreement) or is a same-market media entity (i.e., broadcast company or newspaper). In December 2007, the FCC increased these limits under certain circumstances where the equity and/or debt interests are in a small business meeting certain requirements. Subsequently, however, the Third Circuit vacated the FCC’s definition of small businesses eligible to take advantage of the increased limits. The FCC has sought comment on alternatives to its previous definition of eligible small businesses in its 2010 quadrennial review.

To assess whether a voting stock interest in a direct or indirect parent corporation of a broadcast licensee is attributable, the FCC uses a “multiplier” analysis in which non-controlling voting stock interests are deemed proportionally reduced at each non-controlling link in a multi-corporation ownership chain.

Under existing FCC policy, in the case of corporations having a “single majority shareholder,” the interests of minority shareholders are generally not deemed attributable. Because Jeffrey H. Smulyan’s voting interest in the Company currently exceeds 50%, this exemption appears to apply to the Company. Elimination of the exemption is, however, under consideration by the FCC. If the exemption is eliminated, or if Mr. Smulyan’s voting interest falls to or below 50%, then the interests of any minority shareholders that meet or exceed the thresholds described above would become attributable and would be combined with the Company’s interests for purposes of determining compliance with FCC ownership rules.

Ownership-rule conflicts arising as a result of aggregating the media interests of the Company and its attributable shareholders could require divestitures by either the Company or the affected shareholders. Any such conflicts could result in Emmis being unable to obtain FCC consents necessary for future acquisitions. Conversely, Emmis’ media interests could operate to restrict other media investments by shareholders having or acquiring an interest in Emmis.

ASSIGNMENTS AND TRANSFERS OF CONTROL. The Communications Act prohibits the assignment of a broadcast license or the transfer of control of a broadcast licensee without the prior approval of the FCC. In determining whether to grant such approval, the FCC considers a number of factors, including compliance with the various rules limiting common ownership of media properties, the “character” of the assignee or transferee and those persons holding attributable interests therein and compliance with the Communications Act’s limitations on alien ownership as well as other statutory and regulatory requirements. When evaluating an assignment or transfer of control application, the FCC is prohibited from considering whether the public interest might be served by an assignment of the broadcast license or transfer of control of the licensee to a party other than the assignee or transferee specified in the application.

PROGRAMMING AND OPERATION. The Communications Act requires broadcasters to serve the “public interest.” Beginning in the late 1970s, the FCC gradually relaxed or eliminated many of the more formalized procedures it had developed to promote the broadcast of certain types of programming responsive to the needs of a station’s community of license. However, licensees continue to be required to present programming that is responsive to community problems, needs and interests and to maintain certain records demonstrating such responsiveness.

Federal law prohibits the broadcast of obscene material at any time and the broadcast of indecent material during specified time periods; these prohibitions are subject to enforcement by the FCC and carry fines of up to $325,000 per violation.

In August 2004, Emmis entered into a Consent Decree with the FCC, pursuant to which (i) the company adopted a compliance plan intended to avoid future indecency violations, (ii) the company admitted, solely for purposes of the Decree, that certain prior broadcasts were “indecent,” (iii) the company agreed to make a voluntary payment of $300,000 to the U.S. Treasury, (iv) the FCC rescinded its prior enforcement actions against the company based on allegedly indecent broadcasts, and agreed not to use against the company any indecency violations based on complaints within the FCC’s possession as of the date of the Decree or “similar” complaints based on pre-Decree broadcasts, and (v) the FCC found that neither the alleged indecency violations nor the circumstances surrounding a civil suit filed by an announcer at an Emmis station that has since been sold raised any substantial and material questions concerning the company’s qualifications to hold FCC licenses. The Consent Decree was subsequently upheld by a federal court of appeals. Petitions were filed against the license renewal applications of KPNT and the previously owned station, and an informal objection was filed against the license renewals of the company’s Indiana radio stations, in each case based primarily on the matters covered by the Decree. Petitions against KPNT remain pending. The objections against the Indiana license renewals and a petition for reconsideration of the grant of those applications were rejected by the FCC, as were applications for review of those FCC actions. A petition for reconsideration of the decision denying the application for review related to the license renewal applications for the Indiana stations and the previously owned station was later filed, and remains pending. Subsequent to the approval of the Consent Decree, the company has received letters of inquiry from the FCC alleging

Table of Contents

additional violations of the indecency rules. The broadcasts covered by these letters of inquiry are not covered by the Consent Decree and could result in the imposition of liability.

The FCC’s indecency rules have also been the subject of litigation. In July 2010, the Second Circuit held the FCC’s indecency standards to be unconstitutionally vague in violation of the First Amendment. The Second Circuit later vacated the agency decision at issue in another appeal based on its earlier decision. The FCC challenged these rulings in the Supreme Court. In June 2012 the Supreme Court vacated the Second Circuit’s decision, finding that the FCC had failed to provide adequate notice regarding the contours of its indecency policy with respect to the broadcasts at issue in the underlying proceedings, but leaving open the possibility that the agency might be able to enforce the prohibition on broadcast indecency in the future. The Third Circuit issued a decision vacating another FCC indecency ruling in November 2011, and the Supreme Court denied the FCC’s request for review of this decision. It is not clear how the FCC will apply these judicial decisions to outstanding complaints, including those involving Emmis stations, or how they will impact future FCC policies in this area. The FCC has also solicited public comment on whether, and if so how, to revise its indecency enforcement policies, in a proceeding that remains pending.

In 2006, the FCC commenced an industry-wide inquiry into possible violations of sponsorship identification requirements and “payola” in the radio industry. Its initial inquiries were directed to four radio groups (Emmis was not one of them), and in April 2007, those groups entered into Consent Decrees with the FCC to resolve outstanding investigations and allegations. Emmis received similar inquiries from the FCC concerning an individual complaint which alleged violations of the sponsorship identification requirements and submitted responses and in April 2011 entered into a Consent Decree with the FCC to resolve these inquiries. Pursuant to the Consent Decree, (i) the company adopted a compliance plan intended to avoid violations of the sponsorship identification requirements, (ii) the company agreed to make a voluntary payment of $12,000 to the U.S. Treasury, and (iii) the FCC terminated its investigation of the matters covered by the complaint and agreed not to use against the company the facts that it had developed in its investigation of the complaint or the existence of the Consent Decree.

Stations also must pay regulatory and application fees and follow various rules promulgated under the Communications Act that regulate, among other things, political advertising, sponsorship identification, equal employment opportunities, contest and lottery advertisements, and technical operations, including limits on radio frequency radiation.

Failure to observe FCC rules and policies can result in the imposition of various sanctions, including monetary fines, the grant of “short-term” (less than the maximum term) license renewals or, for particularly egregious violations, the denial of a license renewal application or the revocation of a license.

ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENTS AND PROPOSED CHANGES. The FCC has adopted rules implementing a new low power FM (“LPFM”) service, and approximately 800 such stations are in operation. In November 2007, the FCC adopted rules that, among other things, enhance LPFM’s interference protection from subsequently-authorized full-service stations. Congress then passed legislation eliminating certain minimum distance separation requirements between full-power and LPFM stations, thereby reducing the interference protection afforded to FM stations. As required by the legislation, the FCC in January 2012 submitted a report to Congress indicating that the results of a statutorily mandated economic study indicated that, on the whole, LPFM stations do not currently have, and in the future are unlikely to have, a demonstrable economic impact on full-service commercial FM radio stations. In March 2012, the FCC modified its rules to permit the processing of additional LPFM applications and to implement the legislative requirements regarding interference protection. The FCC opened a window for the filing of applications seeking authority to construct or make major changes to LPFM facilities which extended from October 15 through November 14, 2013, and in which it received more than 2,800 LPFM applications. The FCC continues to process the applications submitted during the window and, despite the findings of the March 2012 FCC study, we cannot predict whether any LPFM stations will interfere with the coverage of our radio stations.

In June 2009, the FCC adopted rules that allow an AM radio station to use currently authorized FM translator stations to retransmit the AM station’s programming within the AM station’s authorized service area.

The FCC also previously authorized the launch and operation of a satellite digital audio radio service (“SDARS”) system. In July 2008, the two original SDARS companies-Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc. and XM Satellite Radio Holdings, Inc.-merged into a new company called Sirius XM, which currently provides nationwide programming service. Sirius XM also offers channels that provide local traffic and weather information for major cities.

In October 2002, the FCC issued an order selecting a technical standard for terrestrial digital audio broadcasting (“DAB,” also known as high definition radio or “HD Radio”). The in-band, on-channel (“IBOC”) technology chosen by the agency allows AM and FM radio broadcasters to introduce digital operations and permits existing stations to operate on their current frequencies in either full analog mode, full digital mode, or a combination of both (at reduced power). In March 2005, the FCC announced that, pending adoption of final rules, it would allow stations on an interim basis to broadcast multiple digital channels. In March 2007, the FCC adopted service rules for HD Radio^®. Significantly, the FCC decided to allow FM stations to broadcast digital multicast streams without seeking prior FCC authority, to provide datacasting services, to lease excess digital capacity to third parties, and to offer subscription services pursuant to requests for experimental authority. Under the new rules, FM stations may operate in the “extended hybrid mode,” which provides more flexibility for multicasting and datacasting services; and may use

Table of Contents

separate analog and digital antennas without seeking prior FCC authority. FM translators, FM boosters and low power FM stations may also broadcast digitally where feasible, and AM stations may now operate digitally during nighttime hours. The new rules mandate that broadcasters offering digital service provide at least one free over-the-air signal comparable in quality to their analog signal and that they simulcast their analog programming on their main digital stream, and prohibit broadcasters from operating exclusively in digital. The FCC declined either to set any mandatory deadline for broadcasters to convert to digital operations or to impose additional public interest obligations (beyond those that already apply to analog broadcasters) on digital broadcasters. The FCC did, however, adopt a Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on (among other things) whether additional public interest obligations are necessary, including consideration of a requirement that radio stations report their public service programming in detail on a standardized form and post that form and all other contents of their public inspection files on the station’s website. (The FCC subsequently imposed such a requirement on television stations. Broadcasters challenged the portions of the requirement related to the political file, and their appeal remains pending.) In January 2010, the FCC revised its DAB service rules to allow FM DAB stations to increase the permitted power levels of DAB transmissions. In September 2008, shortly after approving the Sirius-XM merger, the FCC sought comment on whether it should mandate the inclusion of HD Radio^® features in satellite radio receivers. That proceeding remains pending, and we cannot predict its outcome or the impact that a decision might have on our business.

For the license period 2006-2015, Emmis has been paying royalty rates for non-interactive Internet streaming of sound recordings in accordance with a settlement agreement reached in February 2009 between the National Association of Broadcasters (“NAB”) and SoundExchange (the entity that represents the recording industry and receives royalty payments from webcasters). On March 9, 2011, the Copyright Royalty Board (“CRB”) published statutory royalty rates and terms for non-interactive Internet streaming of sound recordings for 2011-2015. The rates do not apply to services, like Emmis’ Internet streaming services, that are governed by the NAB-SoundExchange settlement. For radio broadcasters, however, the CRB modeled the statutory rates after the rates agreed to in the settlement; both sets of rates increase from 0.17 cent per listener per song in 2011 to 0.25 cent per listener per song in 2015. The CRB has commenced a proceeding to set rates for the upcoming 2016-2020 license period, which remains pending. We cannot predict the outcome of that proceeding or determine the impact (if any) on our business of any new rates the CRB may set or the parties may agree to for the upcoming license period.

Legislation has also been introduced in Congress that would require the payment of performance royalties to artists, musicians, or record companies whose music is played on terrestrial radio stations, ending a long-standing copyright law exception. If enacted, such legislation could have an adverse impact on the cost of music programming.

In December 2007, the FCC initiated a proceeding to consider imposing requirements intended to promote broadcasters’ service to their local communities, including (i) requiring stations to establish a “community advisory board,” (ii) reinstating a requirement that a station’s main studio be in its community of license and (iii) imposing local programming “guidelines” that, if not met, would result in additional scrutiny of a station’s license renewal application. While many broadcasters have opposed these proposals, we cannot predict how the FCC will resolve the issue.

In February 2012, Congress passed legislation authorizing the FCC to conduct an incentive auction to redistribute spectrum currently used by television broadcasters and to require television broadcasters that do not participate in the auction to make certain modifications to their transmission facilities. The FCC has commenced proceedings to adopt rules implementing this legislation, which remain pending. The spectrum used by radio broadcasters such as Emmis, however, is not included in this legislation.

Congress and the FCC also have under consideration, and may in the future consider and adopt, new laws, regulations and policies regarding a wide variety of additional matters that could, directly or indirectly, affect the operation, ownership and profitability of our broadcast stations, result in the loss of audience share and advertising revenues for our broadcast stations and/or affect our ability to acquire additional broadcast stations or finance such acquisitions. Such matters include, but are not limited to:


•	proposals to impose spectrum use or other fees on FCC licensees;


•	proposals to repeal or modify some or all of the FCC’s multiple ownership rules and/or policies;


•	proposals to change rules relating to political broadcasting;


•	technical and frequency allocation matters;


•	AM stereo broadcasting;


•	proposals to modify service and technical rules for digital radio, including possible additional public interest requirements for terrestrial digital audio broadcasters;


•	proposals to restrict or prohibit the advertising of beer, wine and other alcoholic beverages;


•	proposals to tighten safety guidelines relating to radio frequency radiation exposure;


•	proposals permitting FM stations to accept formerly impermissible interference;


•	proposals to reinstate holding periods for licenses;


•	changes to broadcast technical requirements related to the implementation of SDARS;


•	proposals to reallocate spectrum associated with TV channels 5 and 6 for FM radio broadcasting;


•	proposals to modify broadcasters’ public interest obligations;


•	proposals to limit the tax deductibility of advertising expenses by advertisers; and

Table of Contents


•	proposals to regulate violence and hate speech in broadcasts.

We cannot predict whether any proposed changes will be adopted, what other matters might be considered in the future, or what impact, if any, the implementation of any of these proposals or changes might have on our business.

The foregoing is only a brief summary of certain provisions of the Communications Act and of specific FCC regulations. Reference should be made to the Communications Act as well as FCC regulations, public notices and rulings for further information concerning the nature and extent of federal regulation of broadcast stations.

GEOGRAPHIC FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The Company’s segments operate exclusively in the United States. We formerly operated radio networks in eastern Europe, all of which had been sold or ceased broadcasting as of February 28, 2013. All financial information related to our international radio operations has been reclassified to discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

The risk factors listed below, in addition to those set forth elsewhere in this report, could affect the business and future results of the Company. Past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods.

Risks Related to our Business

Our results of operations could be negatively impacted by weak economic conditions and instability in financial markets.

We believe that advertising is a discretionary business expense. Spending on advertising tends to decline disproportionately during an economic recession or downturn as compared to other types of business spending. Consequently, a downturn in the United States economy generally has an adverse effect on our advertising revenue and, therefore, our results of operations. A recession or downturn in the economy of any individual geographic market, particularly a major market such as Los Angeles or New York, also generally has a significant effect on us. The 2008 economic recession negatively impacted our results of operations. While economic conditions appear to be improving, unemployment remains high and we cannot ensure that our results of operations won’t be negatively impacted by delays or reversals in the economic recovery or by future economic downturns.

Even with a recovery from the 2008 economic recession, an individual business sector (such as the automotive industry) that tends to spend more on advertising than other sectors might be forced to maintain a reduced level of advertising expenditures if that sector experiences a slower recovery than the economy in general, or might reduce its advertising expenditures further if additional downturns occur. If that sector’s spending represents a significant portion of our advertising revenues, any reduction in its advertising expenditures may affect our revenue.

We may lose audience share and advertising revenue to competing radio stations or other types of media.

We operate in highly competitive industries. Our radio stations compete for audiences and advertising revenue with other radio stations and station groups, as well as with other media. Shifts in population, demographics, audience tastes, consumer use of technology and forms of media and other factors beyond our control could cause us to lose market share. Any adverse change in a particular market, or adverse change in the relative market positions of the stations located in a particular market, could have a material adverse effect on our revenue or ratings, could require increased promotion or other expenses in that market, and could adversely affect our revenue in other markets. Other radio broadcasting companies may enter the markets in which we operate or may operate in the future. These companies may be larger and have more financial resources than we have. Our radio stations may not be able to maintain or increase their current audience ratings and advertising revenue in the face of such competition.

We routinely conduct market research to review the competitive position of our stations in their respective markets. If we determine that a station could improve its operating performance by serving a different demographic within its market, we may change the format of that station. Our competitors may respond to our actions by more aggressive promotions of their stations or by replacing the format we vacate, limiting our options if we do not achieve expected results with our new format.

From time to time, other stations may change their format or programming, a new station may adopt a format to compete directly with our stations for audiences and advertisers, or stations might engage in aggressive promotional campaigns. These tactics could result in lower ratings and advertising revenue or increased promotion and other expenses and, consequently, lower earnings and cash flow for us. Any failure by us to respond, or to respond as quickly as our competitors, could also have an adverse effect on our business and financial performance.

Table of Contents

Because of the competitive factors we face, we cannot assure investors that we will be able to maintain or increase our current audience ratings and advertising revenue.

Our radio operations are heavily concentrated in the New York and Los Angeles markets.

Our radio operations in New York and Los Angeles, including the LMA fee we receive from a subsidiary of Disney, accounted for approximately 50% of our radio revenues in fiscal 2014. Our results from operations can be materially affected by decreased ratings or resulting revenues in either one of these markets. This concentration is expected to increase in fiscal 2015 due to our planned acquisition of WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM in New York.

Our radio operations lack the scale of some of our competitors, especially in the New York and Los Angeles markets.

We currently own one station in Los Angeles and two stations in New York, one of which is being programmed by another broadcaster under the terms of an LMA. Some of our competitors in these markets have larger clusters of radio stations. Our competitors may be able to leverage their market share to extract a greater percentage of available advertising revenues in these markets and may be able to realize operating efficiencies by programming multiple stations in a market. Also, given the reliance on single formats in each of these markets, our results from operations can be materially affected by additional format competition by our competitors. While the acquisition of WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM in New York will increase our scale in that market, we will continue to have fewer stations than several of our competitors in New York.

We must respond to the rapid changes in technology, services and standards that characterize our industry in order to remain competitive, and changes in technology may increase the risk of material intellectual property infringement claims.

The radio broadcasting industry is subject to rapid technological changes, evolving industry standards and the emergence of competition from new technologies and services. We cannot assure that we will have the resources to acquire new technologies or to introduce new services that could compete with these new technologies. Various media technologies and services that have been developed or introduced include:


•	satellite-delivered digital audio radio service, which has resulted in subscriber-based satellite radio services with numerous niche formats;


•	audio programming by cable systems, direct-broadcast satellite systems, personal communications systems, Internet content providers and other digital audio broadcast formats;


•	personal digital audio devices (e.g., audio via Wi-Fi, mobile phones, iPods^®, iPhones^®, WiMAX, the Internet and MP3 players);


•	HD Radio^®, which provides multi-channel, multi-format digital radio services in the same bandwidth currently occupied by traditional AM and FM radio services; and


•	low-power FM radio, which could result in additional FM radio broadcast outlets, including additional low-power FM radio signals authorized in December 2010 under the Local Community Radio Act.

New media has resulted in fragmentation in the advertising market, but we cannot predict the impact that additional competition arising from new technologies may have on the radio broadcasting industry or on our financial condition and results of operations. We also cannot ensure that our investments in HD Radio^®, TagStation^®, NextRadio^® and other technologies will produce the desired returns.

Additionally, technological advancements in the operation of radio stations and related businesses have increased the number of patent and other intellectual property infringement claims brought against broadcasters, including Emmis. While Emmis has not historically been subject to material patent and other intellectual property claims and takes certain steps to limit the likelihood of, and exposure to, such claims, no assurance can be given that material claims will not be asserted in the future.

Our business depends heavily on maintaining our licenses with the FCC. We could be prevented from operating a radio station if we fail to maintain its license.

The radio broadcasting industry is subject to extensive and changing regulation. The Communications Act and FCC rules and policies require FCC approval for transfers of control and assignments of FCC licenses. The filing of petitions or complaints against FCC licensees could result in the FCC delaying the grant of, or refusing to grant, its consent to the assignment of licenses to or from an FCC licensee or the transfer of control of an FCC licensee. In certain circumstances, the Communications Act and FCC rules and policies will operate to impose limitations on alien ownership and voting of our common stock. There can be no assurance that there will be no changes in the current regulatory scheme, the imposition of additional regulations or the creation of new regulatory agencies, which changes could restrict or curtail our ability to acquire, operate and dispose of stations or, in general, to compete profitably with other operators of radio and other media properties.

Each of our radio stations operates pursuant to one or more licenses issued by the FCC. Under FCC rules, radio licenses are granted for a term of eight years. Our licenses expire at various times through February 2021. Although we will apply to renew these licenses, third parties may challenge our renewal applications. While we are not aware of facts or circumstances

Table of Contents

that would prevent us from having our current licenses renewed, there can be no assurance that the licenses will be renewed or that renewals will not include conditions or qualifications that could adversely affect our business and operations. Failure to obtain the renewal of any of our broadcast licenses may have a material adverse effect on our business and operations. In addition, if we or any of our officers, directors or significant stockholders materially violates the FCC’s rules and regulations or the Communications Act, is convicted of a felony or is found to have engaged in unlawful anticompetitive conduct or fraud upon another government agency, the FCC may, in response to a petition from a third party or on its own initiative, in its discretion, commence a proceeding to impose sanctions upon us which could involve the imposition of monetary fines, the revocation of our broadcast licenses or other sanctions. If the FCC were to issue an order denying a license renewal application or revoking a license, we would be required to cease operating the applicable radio station only after we had exhausted all rights to administrative and judicial review without success.

The FCC has engaged in vigorous enforcement of its indecency rules against the broadcast industry, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The FCC’s rules prohibit the broadcast of obscene material at any time and indecent material between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. Broadcasters risk violating the prohibition on the broadcast of indecent material because of the FCC’s broad definition of such material, coupled with the spontaneity of live programming.

Congress has dramatically increased the penalties for broadcasting obscene, indecent or profane programming and broadcasters can potentially face license revocation, renewal or qualification proceedings in the event that they broadcast indecent material. In addition, the FCC’s heightened focus on indecency, against the broadcast industry generally, may encourage third parties to oppose our license renewal applications or applications for consent to acquire broadcast stations. As a result of these developments, we have implemented certain measures that are designed to reduce the risk of broadcasting indecent material in violation of the FCC’s rules. These and other future modifications to our programming in an effort to reduce the risk of indecency violations could have an adverse effect on our competitive position.

Any changes in current FCC ownership regulations may negatively impact our ability to compete or otherwise harm our business operations.

The FCC is required to review all of its broadcast ownership rules every four years and to repeal or modify any of its rules that are no longer “necessary in the public interest.” We cannot predict the impact of these reviews on our business or their effect on our ability to acquire broadcast stations in the future or to continue to own and freely transfer stations that we have already acquired.

In 2003, we acquired a controlling interest in five FM stations and one AM station in the Austin, Texas market. Under ownership regulations released after the date of our acquisition, it appears that we would be permitted to own or control only four FM stations in the Austin market (ownership of one AM station would continue to be allowed). The new rules do not require divestiture of existing non-conforming station combinations, but do provide that such clusters may be transferred only to defined small business entities or to buyers that commit to selling any excess stations to such entities within one year. Consequently, if we wish to sell our interest in the Austin stations, we will have to either sell to an entity that meets those FCC requirements or exclude at least one FM station from the transaction.

Changes in current Federal regulations could adversely affect our business operations.

Congress and the FCC have under consideration, and may in the future consider and adopt, new laws, regulations and policies that could, directly or indirectly, affect the profitability of our broadcast stations. In particular, Congress is considering a revocation of radio’s exemption from paying royalties to performing artists for use of their recordings (radio already pays a royalty to songwriters). A requirement to pay additional royalties could have an adverse effect on our business operations and financial performance.

Our business strategy and our ability to operate profitably depend on the continued services of our key employees, the loss of whom could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our ability to maintain our competitive position depends to a significant extent on the efforts and abilities of our senior management team and certain key employees. Although our executive officers are typically under employment agreements, their managerial, technical and other services would be difficult to replace if we lose the services of one or more of them or other key personnel. Our business could be seriously harmed if one of them decides to join a competitor or otherwise competes directly or indirectly against us.

Our radio stations employ or independently contract with several on-air personalities and hosts of syndicated radio programs with significant loyal audiences in their respective broadcast areas. These on-air personalities are sometimes significantly responsible for the ranking of a station and, thus, the ability of the station to sell advertising. These individuals may not remain with our radio stations and may not retain their audiences.

Table of Contents

Future operation of our business may require significant additional capital; closing the WBLS-FM/WLIB-AM acquisition will require refinancing our 2012 Credit Agreement.

The continued development, growth and operation of our businesses may require substantial capital. In particular, additional acquisitions may require large amounts of capital. We intend to fund our growth, including acquisitions, if any, with cash generated from operations, borrowings under our Credit Agreement, dated December 28, 2012 (the “2012 Credit Agreement”), and proceeds from future issuances of debt and equity, both public and private. Currently, the 2012 Credit Agreement substantially limits our ability to make acquisitions. Our ability to raise additional debt or equity financing is subject to market conditions, our financial condition and other factors. If we cannot obtain financing on acceptable terms when needed, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely impacted. Furthermore, in order to consummate our announced acquisition of WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM in New York, we must raise additional debt and refinance the debt currently outstanding under the 2012 Credit Agreement. We cannot ensure that we will be able to raise this indebtedness on acceptable terms, if at all.

We may fail to realize any benefits and incur unanticipated losses related to any acquisition.

The success of our strategic acquisitions will depend, in part, on our ability to successfully integrate the acquired assets with our existing assets. It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees, the disruption of ongoing business or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with clients, customers and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. Successful integration may also be hampered by any differences between the operations and corporate culture of the two organizations. If we experience difficulties with the integration process, the anticipated benefits of the acquisition may not be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected. Finally, any cost savings that are realized may be offset by losses in revenues from the acquired business.

Our operating results have been and may again be adversely affected by acts of war, terrorism and natural catastrophes.

Acts of war and terrorism against the United States, and the country’s response to such acts, may negatively affect the U.S. advertising market, which could cause our advertising revenues to decline due to advertising cancellations, delays or defaults in payment for advertising time, and other factors. In addition, these events may have other negative effects on our business, the nature and duration of which we cannot predict.

For example, after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, we decided that the public interest would be best served by the presentation of continuous commercial-free coverage of the unfolding events on our stations. This temporary policy had a material adverse effect on our advertising revenues and operating results for the month of September 2001. Future events like those of September 11, 2001 may cause us to adopt similar policies, which could have a material adverse effect on our advertising revenues and operating results.

Additionally, the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 resulted in the destruction of the transmitter facilities that were located there. Although we had no transmitter facilities located at the World Trade Center, broadcasters that had facilities located in the destroyed buildings experienced temporary disruptions in their ability to broadcast. Since we tend to locate transmission facilities for stations serving urban areas on tall buildings or other significant structures, such as the Empire State Building in New York, further terrorist attacks or other disasters could cause similar disruptions in our broadcasts in the areas affected. If these disruptions occur, we may not be able to locate adequate replacement facilities in a cost-effective or timely manner or at all. Failure to remedy disruptions caused by terrorist attacks or other disasters and any resulting degradation in signal coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Similarly, hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, earthquakes, wild fires and other natural disasters can have a material adverse effect on our operations in any given market. While we generally carry insurance covering such catastrophes, we cannot be sure that the proceeds from such insurance will be sufficient to offset the costs of rebuilding or repairing our property or the lost income.

We have significant obligations relating to our current operating leases.

There are proposed changes to the accounting guidance that could require us to recognize our current operating leases on the balance sheet. As of February 28, 2014, we had operating lease commitments of approximately $58.5 million. These leases are classified as operating leases and disclosed in Note 12 to our accompanying consolidated financial statements. Currently, operating leases are classified as off-balance sheet transactions and only the current year operating lease expense is accounted for in the consolidated statements of operations as rent expense. All of our leases, which have been classified as operating leases, require us to make certain estimates at the inception of the lease in order to determine whether the lease is operating or capital. The proposed change would require that substantially all operating leases be recognized as assets (the right to use the leased property) and liabilities (the present value of future lease payments). The effective date has not been determined and may require retrospective adoption. If adopted in its present form, this would result in: (1) an increase in the assets and

Table of Contents

liabilities reflected on our consolidated balance sheets; and (2) an increase in our interest expense and depreciation and amortization expense and a decrease to our rent expense reflected on our consolidated statements of operations.

Our business is dependent upon the proper functioning of our internal business processes and information systems and modification or interruption of such systems may disrupt our business, processes and internal controls.

The proper functioning of our internal business processes and information systems is critical to the efficient operation and management of our business. If these information technology systems fail or are interrupted, our operations may be adversely affected and operating results could be harmed. Our business processes and information systems need to be sufficiently scalable to support the future growth of our business and may require modifications or upgrades that expose us to a number of operational risks. Our information technology systems, and those of third party providers, may also be vulnerable to damage or disruption caused by circumstances beyond our control. These include catastrophic events, power anomalies or outages, natural disasters, computer system or network failures, viruses or malware, physical or electronic intrusions, unauthorized access and cyber-attacks. Any material disruption, malfunction or similar challenges with our business processes or information systems, or disruptions or challenges relating to the transition to new processes, systems or providers, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Because of our holding company structure, we depend on our subsidiaries for cash flow, and our access to this cash flow is restricted.

We operate as a holding company. All of our radio stations and magazines are currently owned and operated by our subsidiaries. Emmis Operating Company(“EOC”), our wholly-owned subsidiary, is the borrower under our credit facility. All of our station and magazine operating subsidiaries and FCC license subsidiaries are subsidiaries of EOC. Further, we guarantee EOC’s obligations under the credit facility and substantially all of EOC’s assets are pledged as collateral under the credit facility. As a holding company, our only source of cash to pay our obligations, including corporate overhead expenses, is cash distributed from our subsidiaries. We currently expect that the majority of the net earnings and cash flow of our subsidiaries will be retained and used by them in their operations, including servicing their debt obligations. Even if our subsidiaries elect to make distributions to us, we cannot be assured that applicable state law and contractual restrictions, including covenants contained in our credit facility, would permit such dividends or distributions.

Risks Related to our Indebtedness:

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health.

We have a significant amount of indebtedness. At February 28, 2014, our total indebtedness was $128.9 million, consisting of $54.0 million under our 2012 Credit Agreement and $74.9 million of 98.7FM nonrecourse debt. The Company expects that proceeds from the LMA in New York with a subsidiary of Disney will be sufficient to pay all debt service related to the 98.7FM nonrecourse debt. Our shareholders’ equity was $35.8 million. Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences to investors. For example, it could:


•	make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness;


•	increase our vulnerability to generally adverse economic and industry conditions;


•	require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;


•	result in higher interest expense in the event of increases in interest rates because some of our debt is at variable rates of interest;


•	limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our businesses and the industries in which we operate;


•	place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to some of our competitors that have less debt; and


•	limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants in our 2012 Credit Agreement, our ability to borrow additional funds.

If we cannot continue to comply with the financial covenants in our debt instruments, or obtain waivers or other relief from our lenders, we may default, which could result in loss of our sources of liquidity and acceleration of our indebtedness.

We have a substantial amount of indebtedness, and the instruments governing such indebtedness contains restrictive financial covenants. Our ability to comply with the covenants in our debt instruments will depend upon our future performance and various other factors, such as business, competitive, technological, legislative and regulatory factors, some of which are beyond our control. We may not be able to maintain compliance with all of these covenants. In that event, we would need to seek an amendment to our debt instruments, or would need to refinance our debt instruments. There can be no assurance that we can obtain future amendments or waivers of our debt instruments, or refinance our debt instruments and, even if so, it is

Table of Contents

likely that such relief would only last for a specified period, potentially necessitating additional amendments, waivers or refinancings in the future. In the event that we do not maintain compliance with the covenants under our debt instruments, the lenders could declare an event of default, subject to applicable notice and cure provisions, resulting in a material adverse impact on our financial position. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under our debt instruments, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under our 2012 Credit Agreement to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If we were unable to repay those amounts, the lenders could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness. Our lenders under our 2012 Credit Agreement have taken security interests in substantially all of our consolidated assets. If the lenders accelerate the repayment of borrowings, we may be forced to liquidate certain assets to repay all or part of our debt instruments, and we cannot be assured that sufficient assets will remain for us to continue our business operations after we have paid all of the borrowings under our debt instruments. Our ability to liquidate assets is affected by the regulatory restrictions associated with radio stations, including FCC licensing, which may make the market for these assets less liquid and increase the chances that these assets will be liquidated at a significant loss.

Our 98.7FM debt is not subject to these risks to the same degree as the debt under our 2012 Credit Agreement, as certain rights and payments under the 98.7FM LMA have been assigned to the holder of the 98.7FM debt, the 98.7FM debt is generally nonrecourse to the rest of Emmis, and the LMA payments have been guaranteed by Disney Enterprises, Inc.

The terms of our indebtedness and the indebtedness of our direct and indirect subsidiaries may restrict our current and future operations, particularly our ability to respond to changes in market conditions or to take some actions.

Our debt instruments impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions significantly limit or prohibit, among other things, our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, issue preferred stock, incur liens, pay dividends, enter into asset purchase or sale transactions, merge or consolidate with another company, dispose of all or substantially all of our assets or make certain other payments or investments.

These restrictions currently limit our ability to grow our business through acquisitions and could limit our ability to respond to market conditions or meet extraordinary capital needs. They also could restrict our corporate activities in other ways. These restrictions could adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs.

To service our indebtedness and other obligations, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control.

Our 2012 Credit Agreement requires us to repay $8.0 million of our term notes annually in addition to periodic interest payments. Our ability to make payments on our indebtedness and to fund capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. This ability to generate cash, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. Our businesses might not generate sufficient cash flow from operations. We might not be able to complete future offerings, and future borrowings might not be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. We need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness in order to fund the acquisition of radio stations WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM. While we believe we have reasonable prospects of refinancing on commercially reasonable terms, we cannot assure investors that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Risks Related to our Common Stock:

One shareholder controls a majority of the voting power of our common stock, and his interest may conflict with those of other shareholders.

As of May 2, 2014, our Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President, Jeffrey H. Smulyan, beneficially owned shares representing approximately 57% of the outstanding combined voting power of all classes of our common stock, as calculated pursuant to Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act. He therefore is in a position to exercise substantial influence over the outcome of most matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders, including the election of directors.

The difficulties associated with any attempt to gain control of our company could adversely affect the price of our Class A common stock.

Jeffrey H. Smulyan has substantial influence over the decision as to whether a change in control will occur for our company. There are also provisions contained in our articles of incorporation, by-laws and Indiana law that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of Emmis. In addition, FCC approval for transfers of control of FCC licenses and assignments of FCC licenses are required. These restrictions and limitations could adversely affect the trading price of our Class A common stock.

Table of Contents

Our stock price and trading volume could be volatile.

Our Class A common stock is currently listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “EMMS.” The market price of our Class A common stock and our trading volume have been subject to fluctuations since our initial public offering in 1994. Accordingly, the market price of our Class A common stock could experience volatility, regardless of our operating performance.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

The types of properties required to support each of our radio stations include offices, studios and transmitter/antenna sites. We typically lease our studio and office space, although we do own some of our facilities. Most of our studio and office space leases contain lease terms with expiration dates of five to fifteen years. A station’s studios are generally housed with its offices in downtown or business districts. We generally consider our facilities to be suitable and of adequate size for our current and intended purposes. We own many of our main transmitter/antenna sites and lease the remainder of our transmitter/antenna sites with lease terms that generally range from five to twenty years. The transmitter/antenna site for each station is generally located so as to provide maximum market coverage, consistent with the station’s FCC license. In general, we do not anticipate difficulties in renewing facility or transmitter/antenna site leases or in leasing additional space or sites if required. We have approximately $58.5 million in aggregate annual minimum rental commitments under real estate leases. Many of these leases contain escalation clauses such as defined contractual increases or cost-of-living adjustments.

Our principal executive offices are located at 40 Monument Circle, Suite 700, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, in approximately 91,500 square feet of owned office space which is shared by our Indianapolis radio stations and our Indianapolis Monthly publication. This property is subject to a mortgage under our 2012 Credit Agreement.

We own substantially all of our other equipment, consisting principally of transmitting antennae, transmitters, studio equipment and general office equipment. The towers, antennae and other transmission equipment used by our stations are generally in good condition, although opportunities to upgrade facilities are periodically reviewed.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The Company is a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management of the Company, there are no legal proceedings pending against the Company likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Emmis and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed April 16, 2012 by certain holders of Preferred Stock (the “Lock-Up Group”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana entitled Corre Opportunities Fund, LP, et al. v. Emmis Communications Corporation, et al. The plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that Emmis and the other defendants violated various provisions of the federal securities laws and breached fiduciary duties in connection with Emmis’ entry into total return swap agreements and voting agreements with certain holders of Emmis Preferred Stock, as well as by issuing shares of Preferred Stock to Emmis’ 2012 Retention Plan and Trust (the “Trust”) and entering into a voting agreement with the trustee of the Trust. The plaintiffs also alleged that Emmis violated certain provisions of Indiana corporate law by directing the voting of the shares of Preferred Stock subject to the total return swap agreements (the “Swap Shares”) and the shares of Preferred Stock held by the Trust (the “Trust Shares”) in favor of certain amendments to Emmis’ Articles of Incorporation.

Emmis filed an answer denying the material allegations of the complaint, and filed a counterclaim seeking a declaratory judgment that Emmis may legally direct the voting of the Swap Shares and the Trust Shares in favor of the proposed amendments.

On August 31, 2012, the U.S. District Court denied the plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs subsequently filed an amended complaint seeking monetary damages and dismissing all claims against the individual officer and director defendants. On February 28, 2014, the U.S. District Court issued a summary judgment in favor of Emmis on all matters in the complaint. The Plaintiffs filed an appeal of the U.S. District Court's decision in March 2014. Emmis is defending this lawsuit vigorously.

Certain individuals and groups have challenged applications for renewal of the FCC licenses of certain of the Company’s stations. The challenges to the license renewal applications are currently pending before the FCC. Emmis does not expect the challenges to result in the denial of any license renewals.

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Listed below is certain information about the executive officers of Emmis or its affiliates who are not directors or nominees to be directors.



NAME	POSITION	AGE AT FEBRUARY 28, 2014	YEAR FIRST ELECTED OFFICER
Richard F. Cummings	President—Radio Programming	62	1984
J. Scott Enright	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	51	1998
Gregory T. Loewen	President—Publishing Division and Chief Strategy Officer	42	2007

Set forth below is the principal occupation for the last five years of each executive officer of the Company or its affiliates who is not also a director.

Mr. Cummings was appointed President – Radio Programming in March 2009. Mr. Cummings served as Radio Division President from December 2001 to February 2009. Prior to becoming Radio Division President, Mr. Cummings was Executive Vice President of Programming. Mr. Cummings joined Emmis in 1981.

Mr. Enright was appointed Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in March 2009. Previously, Mr. Enright served as Senior Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Secretary of Emmis from September 2006 to February 2009 and as Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from the date he joined Emmis in October 1998, adding the office of Secretary in 2002.

Mr. Loewen was appointed President – Publishing Division and Chief Strategy Officer in March 2010. Previously, Mr. Loewen served as Chief Strategy Officer from February 2007 to February 2010. Prior to joining Emmis in February 2007, Mr. Loewen served as Vice President of Digital Media and Strategy for The Toronto Star.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

MARKET INFORMATION FOR OUR COMMON STOCK

Emmis’ Class A common stock is traded in the over-the-counter market and is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol EMMS. There is no established public trading market for Emmis’ Class B common stock or Class C common stock.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the Class A common stock for the periods indicated.



QUARTER ENDED	HIGH	LOW
May 2012	1.79	0.68
August 2012	2.57	1.36
November 2012	2.50	1.61
February 2013	2.01	1.57

May 2013	1.85	1.43
August 2013	3.44	1.58
November 2013	3.61	2.19
February 2014	3.67	2.34

Table of Contents

HOLDERS

At May 2, 2014, there were 5,168 record holders of the Class A common stock, and there was one record holder of the Class B common stock.

DIVIDENDS

Emmis currently intends to retain future earnings for use in its business and has no plans to pay any dividends on shares of its common stock in the foreseeable future. Emmis’ 2012 Credit Agreement sets forth certain restrictions on our ability to pay dividends. See Note 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for more discussion of the 2012 Credit Agreement.

In connection with the September 4, 2012 amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, all accumulated but undeclared dividends on our Preferred Stock were canceled and the Preferred Stock was changed from cumulative to noncumulative. This amendment is the subject of litigation discussed under Part I, Item 3, “Legal Proceedings.”

SHARE REPURCHASES

During the three-month period ended February 28, 2014, there was withholding of shares of common stock upon vesting of restricted stock to cover withholding tax obligations. The following table provides information on our repurchases during the three months ended February 28, 2014:



Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid Per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (in 000’s)
Class A Common Stock
December 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	—	N/A		—	$	—
January 1, 2014 - January 31, 2014	2,607	$	2.74	—	$	—
February 1, 2014 - February 28, 2014	159,272	$	3.51	—	$	—
	161,879			—
Series A Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
December 1, 2013 - December 31, 2013	—	N/A		—	$	392,875
January 1, 2014 - January 31, 2014	—	N/A		—	$	392,875
February 1, 2014 - February 28, 2014	—	N/A		—	$	392,875
	—			—

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following Performance Graph shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Form 10-K into any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this performance graph by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

The following line graph compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return of our Class A common stock with the cumulative total return of the Nasdaq Stock Market Index and the cumulative total return of an index of certain peer radio broadcasting companies with which the Company competes from February 28, 2009, to the fiscal year ended February 28, 2014. The peer group is comprised of Cumulus Media Inc., Entercom Communications Corp., Radio One, Inc. and Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. The performance graph assumes that an investment of $100 was made in the Class A common stock and in each index on February 28, 2009 and that all dividends were reinvested.

Table of Contents



	2/28/2009		2/28/2010		2/28/2011		2/29/2012		2/28/2013		2/28/2014
Emmis	$	100.00	$	290.32	$	354.84	$	235.48	$	519.35	$	1,012.90
NASDAQ	100.00		162.45		201.93		215.33		229.36		312.67
Peer Group	100.00		509.55		641.74		355.01		421.38		776.71

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The selected financial data as of and for year ended February 28, 2014 and for the four prior years are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The selected financial data for the years ended February 28 (29), 2014, 2013 and 2012 and balance sheets as of February 28, 2014 and 2013 are qualified by reference to, and should be read in conjunction with, the corresponding audited consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this annual report. The selected financial data for the years ended February 28, 2011 and 2010 and the balance sheets as of February 28 (29), 2012, 2011 and 2010 are derived from financial statements not included herein.

Our financial results are not comparable from year to year due to dispositions of radio stations and other businesses, impairments of broadcasting licenses and goodwill and other significant events including:


•	During the years ended February 28, 2013, 2011 and 2010, we recorded impairment losses in continuing operations of $11.4 million, $7.0 million and $146.3 million, respectively. See the notes accompanying the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the contributing factors to the impairment;

•

The Company historically recorded a full valuation allowance on all U.S. (federal and state) deferred tax assets. During the year ended February 28, 2014, principally due to improved operating results, the Company determined that a valuation allowance on most of its deferred tax assets was no longer appropriate and reversed the valuation allowance on all U.S. deferred tax assets (with the exception of certain state NOL DTA's);

•

Throughout the five-year period ending on February 28, 2014, the Company disposed of numerous radio stations, including both of its stations in Chicago, one station in New York and one station in Los Angeles. The net proceeds from station sales were generally used to pay down long-term debt. The decrease in our long-term debt balance coupled with lower rates on outstanding debt balances subsequent to our debt refinancing in December 2012 substantially decreased our interest expense; and


•	On September 1, 2011, Emmis sold a controlling interest in WRXP-FM (New York), WLUP-FM (Chicago) and WKQX-FM (Chicago). Emmis retained a preferred equity interest and common equity interest in the

Table of Contents

company that purchased the stations. Due to its continued equity interests, the Company did not reclassify the results of operations of these stations (which includes a gain on sale of controlling interest of $31.9 million during the year ended February 29, 2012) to discontinued operations, which affects comparability amongst the periods presented below. During the year ended February 29, 2012, Emmis incurred approximately $2.5 million of equity-method losses related to its retained investment in these stations and recorded an other-than-temporary impairment loss of $13.9 million, reducing the carrying amount of the investment to zero.



	Year ended February 28 (29),
	2010			2011			2012		2013			2014
	(in 000's, except per share data)
Operating Data:
Net revenues	$	208,222		$	216,486		$	202,218	$	196,084		$	205,146
(Loss) income from continuing operations	$	(87,424	)	$	(3,319	)	$	35,725	$	(1,829	)	$	48,655
(Loss) income from continuing operations per share (basic)	$	(2.71	)	$	(0.46	)	$	2.21	$	(0.21	)	$	1.08
(Loss) income from continuing operations per share (diluted)	$	(2.71	)	$	(0.46	)	$	0.69	$	(0.21	)	$	0.94

Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets	$	498,168		$	472,477		$	340,769	$	261,624		$	265,348
Long-term debt, net of current portion	$	337,758		$	327,704		$	229,725	$	131,494		$	114,926

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

GENERAL

The following discussion pertains to Emmis Communications Corporation (“ECC”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Emmis” or the “Company”).

We own and operate radio and publishing properties located in the United States. Our revenues are mostly affected by the advertising rates our entities charge, as advertising sales represent approximately 70% of our consolidated revenues. These rates are in large part based on our entities’ ability to attract audiences/subscribers in demographic groups targeted by their advertisers. The Nielsen Company generally measures radio station ratings weekly for markets measured by the Portable People Meter^™ and four times a year for markets measured by diaries. Because audience ratings in a station’s local market are critical to the station’s financial success, our strategy is to use market research, advertising and promotion to attract and retain audiences in each station’s chosen demographic target group.

Our revenues vary throughout the year. As is typical in the broadcasting industry, our revenues and operating income are usually lowest in our fourth fiscal quarter.

In addition to the sale of advertising time for cash, stations typically exchange advertising time for goods or services, which can be used by the station in its business operations. These barter transactions are recorded at the estimated fair value of the product or service received. We generally confine the use of such trade transactions to promotional items or services for which we would otherwise have paid cash. In addition, it is our general policy not to preempt advertising spots paid for in cash with advertising spots paid for in trade.

The following table summarizes the sources of our revenues for the past three years. The category “Non Traditional” principally consists of ticket sales and sponsorships of events our stations and magazines conduct in their local markets. The category “Other” includes, among other items, network revenues and barter.

Table of Contents



	Year ended February 28 (29),
	2012		% of Total		2013		% of Total		2014		% of Total
Net revenues:
Local	$	114,006	56.4	%	$	103,089	52.6	%	$	108,010	52.7	%
National	34,122		16.9	%	31,253		15.9	%	31,995		15.6	%
Political	702		0.3	%	2,242		1.1	%	604		0.3	%
Publication Sales	6,128		3.0	%	6,141		3.1	%	6,312		3.1	%
Non Traditional	19,177		9.5	%	19,653		10.0	%	20,762		10.1	%
Interactive	8,242		4.1	%	8,969		4.6	%	11,429		5.6	%
LMA Fees	310		0.2	%	8,609		4.4	%	10,331		5.0	%
Other	19,531		9.6	%	16,128		8.3	%	15,703		7.6	%
Total net revenues	$	202,218			$	196,084			$	205,146

A significant portion of our expenses varies in connection with changes in revenue. These variable expenses primarily relate to costs in our sales department, such as salaries, commissions and bad debt. Our costs that do not vary as much in relation to revenue are mostly in our programming and general and administrative departments, such as talent costs, syndicated programming fees, utilities, office expenses and salaries. Lastly, our costs that are highly discretionary are costs in our marketing and promotions department, which we primarily incur to maintain and/or increase our audience and market share.

KNOWN TRENDS AND UNCERTAINTIES

Although advertising revenues have stabilized following the 2008 economic recession, radio revenue growth remains challenged. Management believes this is principally the result of two factors: (1) new media, such as various media distributed via the Internet, telecommunication companies and cable interconnects, as well as social networks, which have gained advertising share against radio and other traditional media and created a proliferation of advertising inventory and (2) the fragmentation of the radio audience and time spent listening caused by satellite radio, internet radio, and digital audio sales has led some investors and advertisers to conclude that the effectiveness of radio advertising has diminished.

The Company and the radio industry have begun several initiatives to address these issues. The radio industry is working aggressively to increase the number of smartphones that contain an enabled FM tuner. Most smartphones currently sold in the United States contain an FM tuner. However, most wireless carriers in the United States do not permit the FM tuner to receive the free over-the-air local radio stations it was designed to receive. Furthermore, in many countries outside the United States, enabled FM tuners are made available to smartphone consumers; consequently, radio listening increases. Activating FM as a feature on smartphones sold in the United States has the potential to increase radio listening and improve perception of the radio industry while offering network providers the benefits of a proven emergency notification system, reduced network congestion from audio streaming services, and a host of new revenue generating applications. Emmis is at the leading edge of this initiative and has developed TagStation^®, a cloud-based software platform that allows a broadcaster to manage album art, meta data and enhanced advertising on its various broadcasts, and NextRadio^®, a hybrid radio smartphone application, as an industry solution to make the user experience of listening to free over-the-air radio broadcasts on their enabled smartphones a rich experience. In August 2013, Sprint began enabling FM tuners and pre-loading the NextRadio^® application on certain models of smartphones. The radio industry continues to work with other leading United States network providers, device manufacturers, regulators and legislators to cause FM tuners to be enabled in all smartphones.

The Company has also aggressively worked to harness the power of broadband and mobile media distribution in the development of emerging business opportunities by becoming one of the fifteen largest streaming audio providers in the United States, developing highly interactive websites with content that engages our listeners, using SMS texting and deploying mobile applications, harnessing the power of digital video on our websites and YouTube channels, and delivering real-time traffic to navigation devices.

Along with the rest of the radio industry, the majority of our stations have deployed HD Radio^®. HD Radio^® offers listeners advantages over standard analog broadcasts, including improved sound quality and additional digital channels. In addition to offering secondary channels, the HD Radio^® spectrum allows broadcasters to transmit other forms of data. We are participating in a joint venture with other broadcasters to provide the bandwidth that a third party uses to transmit location-based data to hand-held and in-car navigation devices. The number of radio receivers incorporating HD Radio has increased in the past year, particularly in new automobiles. It is unclear what impact HD Radio^® will have on the markets in which we operate.

Table of Contents

The results of our radio operations are heavily dependent on the results of our stations in the New York and Los Angeles markets. These markets account for approximately 50% of our radio net revenues. During the year ended February 28, 2014, KPWR-FM in Los Angeles experienced revenue growth that was better than its overall market, but revenue growth at WQHT-FM in New York lagged its overall market growth. Our results in New York and Los Angeles are often more volatile than our larger competitors due to our lack of scale in these markets. Our dependence on the performance of one station in each of these markets limits our ability to adapt as the competitive environment shifts. Furthermore, some of our competitors that operate larger station clusters in New York and Los Angeles are able to leverage their market share to extract a greater percentage of available advertising revenue through packaging a variety of advertising inventory at discounted unit rates and may be able to realize operating efficiencies by programming multiple stations in these markets. On March 1, 2014, we significantly increased our scale in New York when we began programming WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM pursuant to a Local Marketing and Programming Agreement. We expect to consummate our acquisition of these assets during fiscal 2015.

As part of our business strategy, we continually evaluate potential acquisitions of radio stations, publishing properties and other businesses that we believe hold promise for long-term appreciation in value and leverage our strengths. However, Emmis Operating Company’s 2012 Credit Agreement substantially limits our ability to make acquisitions. To consummate the announced acquisition of WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM in New York, we will refinance the 2012 Credit Agreement. We also regularly review our portfolio of assets and may opportunistically dispose of assets when we believe it is appropriate to do so. See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of various dispositions.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Critical accounting policies are defined as those that encompass significant judgments and uncertainties, and potentially derive materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our critical accounting policies are those described below.

Revenue Recognition

Broadcasting revenue is recognized as advertisements are aired. Publication revenue is recognized in the month of delivery of the publication. Both broadcasting revenue and publication revenue recognition is subject to meeting certain conditions such as persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists and collection is reasonably assured. These criteria are generally met at the time the advertisement is aired for broadcasting revenue and upon delivery of the publication for publication revenue. Advertising revenues presented in the financial statements are reflected on a net basis, after the deduction of advertising agency fees, usually at a rate of 15% of gross revenues.

FCC Licenses and Goodwill

We have made acquisitions in the past for which a significant amount of the purchase price was allocated to FCC licenses and goodwill assets. As of February 28, 2014, we have recorded approximately $163.2 million in goodwill and FCC licenses, which represents approximately 62% of our total assets.

In the case of our radio stations, we would not be able to operate the properties without the related FCC license for each property. FCC licenses are renewed every eight years; consequently, we continually monitor our stations’ compliance with the various regulatory requirements. Historically, all of our FCC licenses have been renewed at the end of their respective periods, and we expect that all FCC licenses will continue to be renewed in the future. We consider our FCC licenses to be indefinite-lived intangibles.

We do not amortize goodwill or other indefinite-lived intangible assets, but rather test for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired. When evaluating our radio broadcasting licenses for impairment, the testing is performed at the unit of accounting level as determined by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350-30-35. In our case, radio stations in a geographic market cluster are considered a single unit of accounting, provided that they are not being operated under a Local Marketing Agreement by another broadcaster.

We complete our annual impairment tests on December 1 of each year and perform additional interim impairment testing whenever triggering events suggest such testing is warranted.

Valuation of Indefinite-lived Broadcasting Licenses

Table of Contents

Major assumptions involved in this analysis include market revenue, market revenue growth rates, unit of accounting audience share, unit of accounting revenue share and discount rate. Each of these assumptions may change in the future based upon changes in general economic conditions, audience behavior, consummated transactions, and numerous other variables that may be beyond our control. The projections incorporated into our license valuations take current economic conditions into consideration.

Assumptions incorporated into the annual impairment testing as of December 1, 2013 were similar to those used in our December 1, 2012 annual impairment testing. Below are some of the key assumptions used in our annual and interim impairment assessments. The methodology used to value our FCC licenses has not changed in the three-year period ended February 28, 2014.



	December 1, 2011	December 1, 2012	December 1, 2013
Discount Rate	11.9% - 12.2%	11.9% - 12.3%	12.0% - 12.4%
Long-term Revenue Growth Rate	2.5% - 3.3%	2.3% - 3.3%	2.3% - 3.1%
Mature Market Share	3.2% - 29.4%	3.2% - 29.4%	3.5% - 30.2%
Operating Profit Margin	26.0% - 37.2%	25.1% - 38.3%	25.0% - 39.1%

In connection with the April 2012 LMA of 98.7FM in New York previously discussed, the Company separated its two New York stations into separate units of accounting. The Company performed an interim impairment test of those licenses during the quarter ended May 31, 2012, and recorded an interim impairment charge of $11.0 million. No further impairment of our FCC licenses was recorded as a result of our December 1, 2012 or December 1, 2013 annual tests.

Valuation of Goodwill

ASC Topic 350 requires the Company to test goodwill for impairment at least annually using a two-step process. The first step is a screen for potential impairment, while the second step measures the amount of impairment. The Company conducts the two-step impairment test on December 1 of each fiscal year, unless indications of impairment exist during an interim period. When assessing its goodwill for impairment, the Company uses an enterprise valuation approach to determine the fair value of each of the Company’s reporting units (radio stations grouped by market and magazines on an individual basis). Management determines enterprise value for each of its reporting units by multiplying the two-year average station operating income generated by each reporting unit (current year based on actual results and the next year based on budgeted results) by an estimated market multiple. The Company uses a blended station operating income trading multiple of publicly traded radio operators as a benchmark for the multiple it applies to its radio reporting units. There are no publicly traded publishing companies that are focused predominantly on city and regional magazines as is our publishing segment. Therefore, the market multiple used as a benchmark for our publishing reporting units is based on recently completed transactions within the city and regional magazine industry or analyst reports that include valuations of magazine divisions within publicly traded media conglomerates. For the annual assessment performed as of December 1, 2013, the Company applied a market multiple of 7.0 times and 5.0 to 7.0 times the reporting unit’s operating performance for our radio and publishing reporting units, respectively. Management believes this methodology for valuing radio and publishing properties is a common approach and believes that the multiples used in the valuation are reasonable given our peer comparisons and market transactions. To corroborate the step-one reporting unit fair values determined using the market approach described above, management also uses an income approach, which is a discounted cash flow method to determine the fair value of the reporting unit.

This enterprise valuation is compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit for the first step of the goodwill impairment test. If the reporting unit exhibits impairment, the Company proceeds to the second step of the goodwill impairment test. For its step-two testing, the enterprise value is allocated among the tangible assets, indefinite-lived intangible assets (FCC licenses valued using a direct-method valuation approach) and unrecognized intangible assets, such as customer lists, with the residual amount representing the implied fair value of the goodwill. To the extent the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, the difference is recorded as an impairment charge in the statement of operations. The methodology used to value our goodwill has not changed in the three-year period ended February 28, 2014.

During our December 1, 2012 annual goodwill impairment test, the Company wrote off $0.4 million of goodwill associated with our Indianapolis Monthly publication. Declining operating performance of Indianapolis Monthly resulted in a step-one indication of impairment for Indianapolis Monthly on both the market and income approaches. Upon completing the step-two analysis, the Company determined that the full carrying amount of Indianapolis Monthly goodwill of $0.4 million was impaired. No further impairment of our goodwill was recorded as a result of our December 1, 2013 annual test.

Sensitivity Analysis

Based on the results of our December 1, 2013 annual impairment assessment, the fair value of our broadcasting licenses was approximately $281.5 million which was in excess of the $150.6 million carrying value by $130.9 million, or 87%. The fair values exceeded the carrying values of all of our units of accounting. Should our estimates or assumptions worsen, or

Table of Contents

should negative events or circumstances occur in the units that have limited fair value cushion, additional license impairments may be needed.



	Radio Broadcasting Licenses
	As of
Unit of Accounting	December 1, 2013 Carrying Value	December 1, 2013 Fair Value	Percentage by which fair value exceeds carrying value
WQHT-FM (New York)	2,596	61,981	2,287.6	%
98.7FM (New York)	60,525	61,981	2.4	%
Austin Cluster	39,254	40,683	3.6	%
St. Louis Cluster	27,692	30,874	11.5	%
Indianapolis Cluster	17,654	22,812	29.2	%
KPWR-FM (Los Angeles)	2,018	62,305	2,987.5	%
Terre Haute Cluster	819	830	1.3	%
Total	150,558	281,466	86.9	%

If we were to assume a 100 basis points change in any of our three key assumptions (a reduction in the long-term revenue growth rate, a reduction in local commercial share or an increase in the discount rate) used to determine the fair value of our broadcasting licenses on December 1, 2013, the resulting impairment charge would have been $27.7 million, $19.0 million and $11.9 million, respectively. Also, if we were to assume a market multiple decrease of one or a 10% decrease in the two-year average station operating income, two of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of our goodwill on December 1, 2013, the resulting estimates of enterprise valuations would still exceed the carrying values of the enterprises. As such, step two of the goodwill impairment testing would not be required, thus no goodwill impairment would be recognized if these two key assumptions were lowered.

Deferred Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequence of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or income tax returns. Income taxes are recognized during the year in which the underlying transactions are reflected in the consolidated statements of operations. Deferred taxes are provided for temporary differences between amounts of assets and liabilities as recorded for financial reporting purposes and amounts recorded for income tax purposes. After determining the total amount of deferred tax assets, the Company determines whether it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. If the Company determines that a deferred tax asset is not likely to be realized, a valuation allowance will be established against that asset to record it at its expected realizable value.

Insurance Claims and Loss Reserves

The Company is self-insured for most healthcare claims, subject to stop-loss limits. Claims incurred but not reported are recorded based on historical experience and industry trends, and accruals are adjusted when warranted by changes in facts and circumstances. The Company had $0.5 million and $0.6 million accrued for employee healthcare claims as of February 28, 2013 and 2014, respectively. The Company also maintains large deductible programs (ranging from $100 thousand to $250 thousand per occurrence) for workers’ compensation, employment liability, automotive liability and media liability claims.

ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSITIONS AND INVESTMENTS

The transactions described below impact the comparability of operating results for the three years ended February 28, 2014.

Sale of Slovakia radio operations

On February 25, 2013, Emmis completed the sale of its Slovakian radio network to Bauer Ausland 1 GMBH for $21.2 million in cash. Emmis believed the sale of its international radio properties would better enable the Company to focus its efforts on its domestic radio stations. The sale of our Bulgarian radio network on January 3, 2013 created a one-time tax benefit that we could use if we sold the Slovakian network on or before February 28, 2013. In connection with the sale, Emmis recorded a gain on sale of assets of approximately $14.8 million, which is included in income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Emmis paid approximately $1.7 million to settle working capital adjustments and other transaction related costs during the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

Table of Contents

Sale of Bulgarian radio operations

On January 3, 2013, Emmis completed the sale of its Bulgarian radio network to Reflex Media EEOD for $1.7 million in cash. Emmis believed the sale of its international radio properties would better enable the Company to focus its efforts on its domestic radio stations. In connection with the sale, Emmis recorded a loss on sale of assets of approximately $1.3 million, which is included in income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The loss on disposal primarily resulted from the reclassification of accumulated currency translation adjustments.

Sale of Emmis Interactive Inc.

On October 31, 2012, Emmis completed the sale of Emmis Interactive Inc., a subsidiary of Emmis that provided a content management system, data analytic tools and related services, to Marketron Broadcast Solutions, LLC (“Marketron”) for no net proceeds. The sale of Emmis Interactive Inc. allowed Emmis to mitigate expected future operating losses and focus its efforts on its domestic radio operations and other promising technology initiatives. Marketron had assumed operating control of Emmis Interactive, Inc., on October 4, 2012. In connection with the sale, Emmis recorded a loss on sale of assets of approximately $0.7 million, which is primarily related to severance for former employees and is included in income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Sale of Sampler Publications

On October 1, 2012, Emmis completed the sale of Country Sampler magazine, Smart Retailer magazine, and related publications (altogether the “Sampler Publications”) and certain real estate used in their operations to subsidiaries of DRG Holdings, LLC. Emmis believed the sale of the Sampler Publications, which were niche crafting publications, would enable it to more clearly focus on its core city and regional publications. Emmis received gross proceeds from the sale of $8.7 million, incurred approximately $0.2 million in transaction expenses and tax obligations, and used the remaining $8.5 million to repay term loans under the Company’s 2006 Credit Agreement. In connection with the sale, Emmis recorded a gain on sale of assets of approximately $0.7 million, which is included in income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations

Sale of KXOS-FM

On August 23, 2012, Emmis completed the sale of KXOS-FM in Los Angeles for $85.5 million in cash. In connection with the sale, Emmis recorded a gain on sale of assets of approximately $32.8 million, which is included in income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. KXOS-FM had previously been operating pursuant to a local programming and marketing agreement, which is discussed in more detail in Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Sale of controlling interest in WRXP-FM, WKQX-FM AND WLUP-FM

On September 1, 2011, the Company completed the sale of a controlling interest in Merlin Media, LLC (“Merlin Media”), which owned the following radio stations: (i) WKQX-FM, 101.1 MHz, Channel 266, Chicago, IL (FIN 19525), (ii) WRXP-FM, 101.9 MHz, Channel 270, New York, NY (FIN 67846) and (iii) WLUP-FM, 97.9 MHz, Channel 250, Chicago, IL (FIN 73233) (collectively the “Merlin Stations”). The Company received gross cash sale proceeds of $130 million in the transaction, and incurred approximately $8.6 million of expenses, principally consisting of severance, state and local taxes, and professional and other fees and expenses. The Company used the net cash proceeds to repay approximately 38% of the term loans then outstanding under its 2006 Credit Agreement. Emmis also paid a $2.0 million exit fee to Canyon related to the repayment of Extended Term Loans on September 1, 2011.

On September 1, 2011, subsidiaries of Emmis entered into the 2nd Amended & Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (the “LLC Agreement”) of Merlin Media, together with Merlin Holdings, LLC (“Merlin Holdings”), an affiliate of investment funds managed by GTCR, LLC, and Benjamin L. Homel (aka Randy Michaels) (together with Merlin Holdings, the “Investors”).

In connection with the completion of the disposition of assets to Merlin Media and sale of a controlling interest in Merlin Media pursuant to the Purchase Agreement dated June 20, 2011 among the Company, Merlin Holdings and Mr. Homel (the “Purchase Agreement), the Company retained preferred equity and common equity interests in Merlin Media, the terms of which were governed by the LLC Agreement. The Company’s common equity interests in Merlin Media represented 20.6% of the initial outstanding common equity interests of Merlin Media and were subject to dilution if the Company failed to participate pro rata in future capital calls. The fair value of the Company’s 20.6% common equity ownership of Merlin Media LLC as of September 1, 2011 was approximately $5.6 million, and accounted for under the equity method. The Company’s preferred equity interests in Merlin Media consist of approximately $28.7 million (at par) of non-redeemable perpetual preferred interests, on which a preferred return accretes quarterly at a rate of 8% per annum. The fair value of this preferred equity interest as of September 1, 2011, was approximately $10.8 million and is accounted for under the cost method. See Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for more discussion of our investments in Merlin Media. The preferred interests held by the Company are junior to initial non-redeemable perpetual preferred interests held by the Investors of

Table of Contents

approximately $87 million, on which a preferred return accretes quarterly at a rate of 8% per annum. The preferred interests held by the Company and the Investors are both junior to an initial $60 million senior secured note issued to an affiliate of Merlin Holdings. The note matures five years from closing, and interest accrues on the note semi-annually at a rate of 15% per annum, payable in cash or in-kind at Merlin Media’s election. Distributions in respect of Merlin Media’s common and preferred interests are made when declared by Merlin Media’s board of managers. Given the Company’s continued equity interests in the stations, it was precluded from reclassifying the operating results of the stations to discontinued operations.

Upon deconsolidation, Emmis recorded the retained common and preferred equity interests at fair value. The fair value of our investments in Merlin Media LLC was calculated using the Black Scholes option-pricing model. The model’s inputs reflect assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument in a current period transaction based upon estimated future cash flows and other estimates at September 1, 2011. Inputs to the model include stock volatility, dividend yields, expected term of the derivatives and risk-free interest rates. Results from the valuation model in one period may not be indicative of future period measurements.

Merlin Media changed the format of WKQX-FM in Chicago and WRXP-FM in New York from a music-intensive format to a news/talk format. Both stations incurred substantial start-up losses well in excess of the original business model used in the September 1, 2011 valuation. Both stations underperformed through February 29, 2012, so much so that station cash flows were expected to be substantially lower than the estimated cash flows used in the September 1, 2011 valuation of our retained common and preferred equity interests. As such, Emmis reassessed the fair value of the retained common and preferred equity interests using the same valuation methodology described above with updated assumptions, and determined that our equity interests were fully impaired. The Company believes that the magnitude of the impairment and the potentially prolonged recovery period indicate that the impairment is other-than-temporary. As such, Emmis wrote-off the remaining carrying value of its investments in Merlin Media LLC. The total equity method loss and other-than-temporary impairment loss recognized related to Merlin Media LLC of $16.4 million is recognized in other income (expense), net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. During the year ended February 28, 2013, Merlin Media sold WRXP-FM in New York to a third party and changed the format of WKQX-FM in Chicago to a music-intensive format. During the year ended February 28, 2014, Merlin Media entered into an LMA with Cumulus Media, Inc. ("Cumulus") whereby Cumulus began programming Merlin Media's two remaining radio stations in Chicago. The transaction also includes a put and call feature that will presumably result in Cumulus purchasing Merlin Media's remaining assets within four years. The monthly fees provided for in the LMA with Cumulus plus the put/call price are not sufficient for Emmis to realize any value as a result of its retained preferred and common ownership interests.

Under the LLC Agreement, the Company is entitled initially to appoint one out of five members of Merlin Media’s board of managers and has limited consent rights with respect to specified transactions. The Company has no obligation to make ongoing capital contributions to Merlin Media, but as noted above is subject to dilution if it fails to participate pro rata in future capital calls. As of February 28, 2014, due to our nonparticipation in capital contributions to Merlin Media, our common equity ownership interest is approximately 17.5%.

Merlin Media is a private company and the Company will have limited ability to sell its interests in Merlin Media, except pursuant to customary tag-along rights with respect to sales by Merlin Media’s controlling Investor or, after five years, in a private sale to third parties subject to rights of first offer held by the controlling Investor. The Company has customary registration rights and is subject to a “drag-along” right of the controlling Investor.

On September 30, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved a discretionary bonus of $1.7 million to certain employees that were key participants in the Merlin Media transaction. The discretionary bonus is reflected in corporate expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense during the year ended February 29, 2012.

Sale of Glendale, CA Tower Site

On April 6, 2011, Emmis sold land, towers and other equipment at its Glendale, CA tower site to Richland Towers Management Flint, Inc. for $6.0 million in cash. In connection with the sale, Emmis recorded a gain on sale of assets of approximately $4.9 million. Net proceeds from the sale were used to repay amounts outstanding under the 2006 Credit Agreement.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Table of Contents

YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2013 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2014

Net revenues:



	For the years ended February 28,
	2013		2014		$ Change		% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Net revenues:
Radio	$	138,630	$	145,399	$	6,769	4.9	%
Publishing	57,454		59,747		2,293		4.0	%
Total net revenues	$	196,084	$	205,146	$	9,062	4.6	%

Radio net revenues increased during the year ended February 28, 2014 due to low single-digit market revenue growth and strong operating performance in four of our five measured markets. We typically monitor the performance of our stations against the aggregate performance of the markets in which we operate based on reports for the periods prepared by Miller Kaplan. Miller Kaplan reports are generally prepared on a gross revenues basis and exclude revenues from barter arrangements. Miller Kaplan reports are not available for the Terre Haute radio market. A summary of market revenue performance and Emmis’ revenue performance in those markets for the year ended February 28, 2014 is presented below:



	For the year ended February 28, 2014
	Overall Market		Emmis
Market	Revenue Performance		Revenue Performance ¹
New York	5.5	%	-2.3	%
Los Angeles	1.2	%	8.6	%
St. Louis	-1.6	%	2.7	%
Indianapolis	-1.6	%	4.2	%
Austin	5.0	%	10.0	%
All Markets	2.7	%	4.9	%

¹ Emmis revenue performance in New York reflects only WQHT-FM

We principally attribute our better-than-market revenue growth to three factors: (1) our focus on local sales and our strategy of having the most highly skilled local sales team in each market, (2) our digital initiatives, which generated revenue growth in excess of 25% over the prior year, and (3) our Incite group, which caters to the under-served government, not-for-profit, and corporate philanthropy segment of the local advertising market.

Publishing net revenues increased in the year ended February 28, 2014 as investments in our sales teams have helped us accelerate revenue growth at our magazines. In addition, we have increased the number of custom publications (e.g., college alumni magazines, tourism guides, etc.) that we produce.

Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense:



	For the years ended February 28,
	2013		2014		$ Change		% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense:
Radio	$	95,830	$	99,924	$	4,094	4.3	%
Publishing	58,241		59,085		844		1.4	%
Total station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense	$	154,071	$	159,009	$	4,938	3.2	%

The increase in station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense for our radio division for the year ended February 28, 2014 is mainly attributable to increased noncash compensation expense associated with the 2012 Retention Trust Plan, expenses related to the development and launch of our smartphone application, and higher sales-related costs due to the increase in net revenues.

Table of Contents

Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense for publishing increased during the year ended February 28, 2014 mostly due to increased print production costs, increased noncash compensation expense associated with the 2012 Retention Trust Plan, and continued strategic investments in sales, marketing and digital initiatives.

Corporate expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense:



	For the years ended February 28,
	2013		2014		$ Change			% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Corporate expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense	$	17,819	$	17,024	$	(795	)	(4.5	)%

Corporate expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense decreased during the year ended February 28, 2014 primarily due to a decline in legal expenses associated with our preferred stock litigation and a $1.2 million nonrecurring expense in the prior year related to the forgiveness of a loan to our CEO. These decreases were partially offset by higher noncash compensation expense related to the 2012 Retention Trust Plan and contractual bonuses that were paid in stock.

Hungary license litigation expense:



	For the year ended February 28,
	2013		2014		$ Change		% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Hungary license litigation expense	$	1,381	$	2,058	$	677	49.0	%

On October 28, 2009, the Hungarian National Radio and Television Board (ORTT) announced that it was awarding to another bidder the national radio license then held by our majority-owned subsidiary, Slager. Slager ceased broadcasting effective November 19, 2009. The Company believes that the awarding of the license to the other bidder was unlawful. In October 2011, Emmis filed for arbitration with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) seeking resolution of its claim. In April 2014, the ICSID arbitral tribunal ruled that ICSID did not have the jurisdiction to hear the merits of Emmis' claim. The increase in expenses for the year ended February 28, 2014 is mostly due to legal costs incurred in connection with our preparation for the December 2013 ICSID jurisdictional hearing.

Impairment loss on intangible assets:



	For the year ended February 28,
	2013		2014		$ Change			% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Impairment loss on intangible assets	$	11,419	$	—	$	(11,419	)	(100	)%

In connection with our April 2012 LMA of 98.7FM in New York and in accordance with the Company’s accounting policy, the Company decoupled its two New York FCC licenses into separate units of accounting. The Company performed an interim impairment test of the 98.7FM in New York given its carrying value exceeded the fair value of a single New York FCC license as of our December 2011 impairment test. The Company recorded an $11.0 million impairment loss in connection with the interim review.

In connection with our annual impairment review conducted on December 1, 2012, the Company determined that the goodwill of its Indianapolis Monthly publication was fully impaired and recorded a $0.4 million loss.

Absent further changes in the Company’s determination of units of accounting due to the execution of an LMA or a significant change in the Company’s assumptions used in determining the fair value of its FCC licenses, the Company believes that continued growth of radio revenues makes it unlikely that further impairment losses will be recorded related to its FCC licenses. Furthermore, barring a significant change in the Company’s assumptions used in determining the fair value of its goodwill, the operating performance of our entities with recorded goodwill makes it unlikely that material amounts of goodwill will be written off in future periods. Accordingly, we do not expect historical operating results to be indicative of future operating results.

Table of Contents

Depreciation and amortization:



	For the years ended February 28,
	2013		2014		$ Change			% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Depreciation and amortization:
Radio	$	2,451	$	2,476	$	25		1.0	%
Publishing	318		235		(83		)	(26.1	)%
Corporate	1,953		2,155		202			10.3	%
Total depreciation and amortization	$	4,722	$	4,866	$	144		3.0	%

The increase in depreciation and amortization for the year ended February 28, 2014 is mostly due to new computer equipment and software placed into service this fiscal year.

Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets:



	For the years ended February 28,
	2013			2014			$ Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets:
Radio	$	(9,897	)	$	(10	)	$	9,887
Publishing	20			2			(18		)
Corporate	—			—			—
Total loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets:	$	(9,877	)	$	(8	)	$	9,869

In April 2012, Emmis sold the intellectual property of WRKS-FM in New York for $10.0 million. WRKS-FM’s intellectual property had no carrying value at the time of sale.

Operating income:



	For the years ended February 28,
	2013			2014			$ Change		% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Operating income:
Radio	$	37,894		$	40,951		$	3,057	8.1	%
Publishing	(1,573		)	425			1,998		127.0	%
Corporate	(19,772		)	(19,179		)	593		3.0	%
Total operating income	$	16,549		$	22,197		$	5,648	34.1	%

Radio operating income increased in the year ended February 28, 2014 principally due to (1) strong operating performance in most of our radio markets, as discussed above, and (2) the 98.7FM LMA, which greatly reduced our operating expenses in New York, coupled with severance and contract termination costs incurred in connection with the LMA transaction in the prior year.

Publishing operating income increased in the year ended February 28, 2014 mostly due to stronger advertising revenue performance at most of our magazines, as discussed above.

Corporate operating losses decreased in the year ended February 28, 2014 mostly due to a decline in legal expenses associated with our preferred stock litigation and a $1.2 million nonrecurring expense in the prior year related to the forgiveness of a loan to our CEO, both of which were previously discussed.

Table of Contents

Interest expense:



	For the years ended February 28,
	2013			2014			$ Change			% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Interest expense	$	(20,899	)	$	(7,068	)	$	(13,831	)	(66.2	)%

Interest expense decreased due to significant repayments of long-term debt throughout fiscal 2013, coupled with lower interest rates on long-term debt as a result of our refinancing activity in December 2012.

Loss on debt extinguishment:



	For the years ended February 28,
	2013			2014			$ Change			% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Loss on debt extinguishment	$	(4,508	)	$	(653	)	$	(3,855	)	(85.5	)%

In the prior year the Company recorded a loss on debt extinguishment related to the write-off of debt fees associated with term loans it repaid under our 2006 Credit Agreement. In the current year, the Company recorded a loss on debt extinguishment related to the write-off of debt fees and unamortized debt discount associated with term loans it repaid under our 2012 Credit Agreement.

Other (expense) income, net:



	For the years ended February 28,
	2013			2014		$ Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Other (expense) income, net	$	(10	)	$	116	$	126

Other income for the year ended February 28, 2014 mostly relates to income from equity method investments.

Benefit from income taxes:



	For the years ended February 28,
	2013			2014			$ Change			% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Benefit from income taxes	$	(7,039	)	$	(34,063	)	$	(27,024	)	383.9	%

The Company previously recorded a valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets, including its net operating loss carryforwards, but excluding deferred tax liabilities related to indefinite-lived intangibles. During the year ended February 28, 2014, due to improved operating results, the Company determined that a valuation allowance on most of its net deferred tax assets was no longer appropriate, and reversed the valuation allowance. Also, during the year ended February 28, 2014, the Company recorded a benefit of approximately $0.7 million related to the favorable settlement of a state tax dispute and a benefit of approximately $0.5 million related to lower than expected state tax liabilities on asset dispositions.

The benefit for income taxes in the year ended February 28, 2013 principally relates to the utilization of previously reserved net operating losses and the tax benefit associated with our impairment loss on the 98.7FM FCC license.

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax:



	For the years ended February 28,
	2013		2014		$ Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	50,080	$	—	$	(50,080	)

Our international radio operations in Hungary, Slovakia and Bulgaria, our Emmis Interactive operations, our operations of KXOS-FM and our Country Sampler operations were classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements. These operations all ceased prior to February 28, 2013. The income from discontinued operations, net of tax for the year ended February 28, 2013 mostly relates to the gain on sale recorded in connection with the sale of KXOS-FM and our Slovakian radio operations.

Table of Contents

Consolidated net income:



	For the years ended February 28,
	2013		2014		$ Change		% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Consolidated net income	$	48,251	$	48,655	$	404	0.8	%

Consolidated net income is mostly flat as improved operating results in the current year, coupled with lower interest expense and the tax benefits associated with the reversal of our valuation allowance, are mostly offset by income from discontinued operations, net of tax, in the prior year.

Gain on extinguishment of preferred stock:



	For the years ended February 28,
	2013		2014		$ Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Gain on extinguishment of preferred stock	$	—	$	325	$	325

During the year ended February 28, 2014, the Company purchased 8,650 shares of its preferred stock for an

average price of $12.38 per share. Emmis recognized a gain on extinguishment of the preferred stock equal to the difference of

the acquisition price and the liquidation preference of $50 per share.

YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 2012 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2013

Net revenues:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		$ Change			% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Net revenues:
Radio	$	144,826	$	138,630	$	(6,196	)	(4.3	)%
Publishing	57,392		57,454		62			0.1	%
Total net revenues	$	202,218	$	196,084	$	(6,134	)	(3.0	)%

Radio net revenues decreased principally due to the July 15, 2011 commencement of an LMA related to the Merlin Stations and the ultimate sale of a controlling interest in these stations on September 1, 2011. During the time these stations were operated pursuant to the LMA, Emmis recorded, as net revenue, a $0.3 million monthly LMA fee, but did not record advertising sales during this period. Given the Company’s continued equity interests in the stations, it is precluded from reclassifying the operating results of the stations to discontinued operations. Also, the operating results for 98.7FM (formerly known as WRKS-FM in New York) as an adult urban station through April 30, 2012 and the LMA fee revenue recognized since April 30, 2012 have not been classified as discontinued operations. Excluding the Merlin Stations and 98.7FM for both periods presented, radio net revenues would have increased $4.1 million or 3.3%.

Table of Contents

We typically monitor the performance of our stations against the aggregate performance of the markets in which we operate based on reports for the periods prepared by Miller Kaplan. Miller Kaplan reports are generally prepared on a gross revenues basis and exclude revenues from barter arrangements. A summary of market revenue performance and Emmis’ revenue performance in those markets for the year ended February 28, 2013 is presented below:



	For the year ended February 28, 2013
	Overall Market		Emmis
Market	Revenue Performance		Revenue Performance ¹
New York	-0.6	%	9.8	%
Los Angeles	1.5	%	4.7	%
St. Louis	3.0	%	-2.6	%
Indianapolis	0.0	%	0.8	%
Austin	0.7	%	3.0	%
All Markets	0.7	%	3.4	%

¹ Emmis revenue performance in New York reflects only WQHT-FM and Los Angeles reflects only KPWR-FM

Publishing net revenues were flat for the year ended February 28, 2013 as compared to the year ended February 29, 2012. During the year ended February 28, 2013, the publishing division made an effort to increase the percentage of its advertising sales settled in cash and reduce the amount settled in barter. In prior periods, the level of barter activity was significantly higher than the level of barter activity during fiscal 2013. Excluding barter revenue, publishing net revenues for the year ended February 28, 2013 would have increased approximately $2.3 million or 4.6%.

Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		$ Change			% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense:
Radio	$	110,772	$	95,830	$	(14,942	)	(13.5	)%
Publishing	56,522		58,241		1,719			3.0	%
Total station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense	$	167,294	$	154,071	$	(13,223	)	(7.9	)%

Radio station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense, decreased principally due to the LMA and eventual sale of the Merlin Stations as previously discussed as well as our LMA of 98.7FM in New York. In connection with the LMA of 98.7FM in April 2012, Emmis’ operating expenses related to that station were reduced dramatically. Excluding the Merlin Stations and 98.7FM, radio station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense would have increased $5.0 million or 5.7%. This increase is due to continued targeted investments in sales training and enhancements in our digital capabilities, coupled with higher operating expenses associated with WQHT-FM in New York as shared costs that had previously been spread across three stations in New York are now borne by WQHT-FM.

Publishing operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense, increased predominately due to increases in advertising expenses.

Corporate expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		$ Change			% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Corporate expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense	$	19,096	$	17,819	$	(1,277	)	(6.7	)%

During the year ended February 29, 2012, corporate expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense, included the following nonrecurring items (i) approximately $0.6 million of indirect costs associated with the preferred stock transactions discussed in Note 3 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, (ii) approximately $3.0 million of costs associated with the 3^rd Amendment to the Company’s 2006 Credit Agreement discussed in Note 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, (iii) a $1.7 million bonus paid to certain employees in connection with the sale of the Merlin

Table of Contents

Stations and (iv) a $0.7 million discretionary bonus paid to substantially all corporate employees during the quarter ended August 31, 2011.

During the year ended February 28, 2013, corporate expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense, included $2.5 million of costs incurred related to preferred stock litigation, a $1.4 million discretionary bonus paid to substantially all corporate employees and $1.2 million related to the forgiveness of a loan to our CEO in connection with his December 2012 employment agreement. These increases were partially offset by a favorable resolution of an accrued expense, resulting in a $1.4 million reduction to corporate expenses.

Hungary license litigation expense:



	For the year ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		$ Change		% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Hungary license litigation expense	$	871	$	1,381	$	510	58.6	%

On October 28, 2009, the Hungarian National Radio and Television Board (ORTT) announced that it was awarding to another bidder the national radio license then held by our majority-owned subsidiary, Slager. Slager ceased broadcasting effective November 19, 2009. The Company believes that the awarding of the license to the other bidder was unlawful. In October 2011, Emmis filed for arbitration with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”) seeking resolution of its claim. The increase in Slager litigation expense and related costs during the year ended February 28, 2013 is due to additional 3^rd party legal costs incurred by Emmis in the prosecution of its claim.

Impairment loss on intangible assets:



	For the year ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		$ Change		% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Impairment loss on intangible assets	$	—	$	11,419	$	11,419	N/A

Depreciation and amortization:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		$ Change			% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Depreciation and amortization:
Radio	$	2,970	$	2,451	$	(519	)	(17.5	)%
Publishing	365		318		(47		)	(12.9	)%
Corporate	1,390		1,953		563			40.5	%
Total depreciation and amortization	$	4,725	$	4,722	$	(3	)	(0.1	)%

The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense for our radio segment is mostly attributable to the sale of a controlling interest in the Merlin Stations on September 1, 2011. The increase in corporate depreciation and amortization is mostly due to the implementation of a new customer management system that was internally developed.

Table of Contents

Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013			$ Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets:
Radio	$	797	$	(9,897	)	$	(10,694	)
Publishing	1		20			19
Corporate	—		—			—
Total loss (gain) on disposal of fixed assets:	$	798	$	(9,877	)	$	(10,675	)

In July 2011, Emmis sold its office building in Terre Haute, Indiana for $0.2 million and recorded a loss on sale of assets of $0.8 million. In April 2012, Emmis sold the intellectual property of WRKS-FM in New York for $10.0 million. WRKS-FM’s intellectual property had no carrying value at the time of sale.

Operating income:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012			2013			$ Change			% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Operating income:
Radio	$	29,416		$	37,894		$	8,478		28.8	%
Publishing	504			(1,573		)	(2,077		)	(412.1	)%
Corporate	(20,486		)	(19,772		)	714			3.5	%
Total operating income	$	9,434		$	16,549		$	7,115		75.4	%

Most of the change in operating income is related to the effect of the sale of a controlling interest in the Merlin Media Stations and the LMA of 98.7FM. As previously discussed, the operations of the Merlin Media stations remain in continuing operations given the Company’s retained investment in the stations. The operating loss for these stations during fiscal 2012 was approximately $4.9 million. Also contributing to the increase in operating income was the 98.7FM LMA in New York. In connection with the LMA, the Company’s operating expenses of that station were significantly reduced, but the Company continues to receive an LMA payment. The impairment losses recorded during the year ended February 28, 2013 are mostly negated by the gain on sale of WRKS-FM’s intellectual property.

Interest expense:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		$ Change		% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Interest expense	$	19,904	$	20,899	$	995	5.0	%

Although we repaid a significant amount of long-term debt during the year ended February 28, 2013, interest expense increased due to interest incurred on the senior unsecured notes which were issued late in fiscal 2012 and exit fees paid on our extended term loans during fiscal 2013. The company refinanced its debt on December 28, 2012 and expects that interest expense for fiscal 2014 will be materially lower than prior periods.

In accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 205-20-45, the Company allocated interest expense to discontinued operations associated with the portion of term loans required to be repaid as a result of dispositions.

Loss on debt extinguishment:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		$ Change		% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Loss on debt extinguishment	$	2,006	$	4,508	$	2,502	124.7	%

During the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company recorded a $0.5 million loss related to the write-off of debt fees associated with term loans repaid during the year. Additionally, the Company recorded a $1.5 million loss related to the write-

Table of Contents

off of debt fees associated with term loans that were deemed to be substantially modified in connection with the Third Amendment to the 2006 Credit Agreement.

During the year ended February 28, 2013, the Company recorded a $3.1 million loss related to the write-off of debt fees and the redemption premium related to the full repayment of its senior unsecured notes. Also, the Company recorded a $1.4 million loss related to the write-off of debt fees associated with the 2006 Credit Agreement that was repaid on various dates throughout fiscal 2013.

Gain on sale of controlling interest Merlin Media LLC:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		$ Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Gain on sale of controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC	$	31,865	$	—	$	(31,865	)

On September 1, 2011, the Company sold a controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC for $130 million in cash proceeds. Additionally, the Company retained a preferred and common equity interest in Merlin Media LLC. The gain on sale of controlling interest was measured as the aggregate of cash received and the fair value of the retained noncontrolling interests in Merlin Media LLC, less the Company’s carrying value of the assets and liabilities sold.

Other expense, net:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		$ Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Other expense, net	$	15,951	$	10	$	(15,941	)

Other expense, net for the year ended February 29, 2012, principally relates to the Company’s share of Merlin Media LLC’s losses through its investment in Merlin Media LLC’s common equity interests and an other-than-temporary impairment loss on the Company’s investment in both the common equity interests and preferred equity interests of Merlin Media LLC, all of which was $16.4 million. Partially offsetting the losses related to our investments in Merlin Media LLC was income related to our other equity method investments as well as interest income.

Benefit from income taxes:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012			2013			$ Change		% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Benefit from income taxes	$	(32,287	)	$	(7,039	)	$	25,248	(78.2	)%

The benefit for income taxes for the year ended February 29, 2012, principally relates to the utilization of previously reserved net operating losses and the elimination of the portion of the Company’s deferred tax liability attributable to indefinite-lived intangibles associated with the sale of the Merlin Stations.

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012			2013		$ Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	(4,997	)	$	50,080	$	55,077

Discontinued operations consist of our international radio operations (Hungary, Slovakia and Bulgaria), KXOS-FM in Los Angeles, the operations of our Flint Peak Tower Site, Emmis Interactive, and Country Sampler and related publications. The increase in income from discontinued operations, net of tax, for the year ended February 28, 2013 mostly relates to the $32.8 million gain on sale of KXOS-FM and the $14.8 million gain on sale of our Slovakian radio operations.

For a description of properties sold, see the discussion in Note 1(j) and Note 8 to our accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Consolidated net income:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		$ Change		% Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Consolidated net income	$	30,728	$	48,251	$	17,523	57.0	%

The increase in consolidated net income is mostly due to the gain on sale of our discontinued operations during fiscal 2013 as noted above, which is partially offset by the prior year gain on sale of a controlling interest in the Merlin Media Stations and the related impairment of our investment in Merlin Media, all net of tax.

Gain on extinguishment of preferred stock:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		$ Change
	(As reported, amounts in thousands)
Gain on extinguishment of preferred stock	$	61,892	$	—	$	(61,892	)

During the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company purchased or purchased rights in 1,871,529 shares of its preferred stock for $31.7 million. Prior to the September 4, 2012 amendments to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, preferred stock was carried on the balance sheet at its stated liquidation preference of $50 per share. The shares that Emmis purchased rights in are considered extinguished from an accounting perspective, and thus Emmis recognized a gain on extinguishment of the preferred stock equal to the difference of the acquisition price and the carrying amount of the preferred stock.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

CREDIT AGREEMENT

On December 28, 2012, Emmis Operating Company (“EOC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emmis, entered into a credit facility (the “2012 Credit Agreement”) to provide for total borrowings of up to $100 million, including (i) an $80 million term loan and (ii) a $20 million revolver, of which $5 million may be used for letters of credit.

A portion of the proceeds under the 2012 Credit Agreement were used to repay (i) EOC’s indebtedness under and terminate the 2006 Credit Agreement, for which Bank of America, N.A. acted as administrative agent and (ii) the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of November 11, 2011 between Emmis Communications Corporation, as Issuer, and Zell Credit Opportunities Master Fund, L.P., as Purchaser, as amended, (“Senior Unsecured Notes”).

In addition to repaying in full the 2006 Credit Agreement and the Senior Unsecured Notes, the proceeds of the borrowings under the 2012 Credit Agreement were used for working capital needs and other general corporate purposes of Emmis, and certain other transactions permitted under the 2012 Credit Agreement.

All outstanding amounts under the 2012 Credit Agreement bear interest, at the option of EOC, at a rate equal to the Eurodollar Rate or an alternative base rate (as defined in the 2012 Credit Agreement) plus a margin. The margin over the Eurodollar Rate or the alternative base rate varies (ranging from 2.50% to 5.00%), depending on Emmis’ ratio of consolidated total debt to consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the agreement. Interest is due on a calendar month basis under the alternative base rate and at least every three months under the Eurodollar Rate. Beginning 60 days after closing, the 2012 Credit Agreement required Emmis to maintain fixed interest rates, for at least one year, on a minimum of 50% of its total outstanding debt, as defined.

The term loan and revolver both mature on December 28, 2017. Beginning on April 1, 2013, the borrowings under the term loan are payable in quarterly installments equal to 2.50% of the term loan, with the remaining balance payable December 28, 2017. Proceeds from raising additional equity, issuing additional subordinated debt or from asset sales, as well as excess cash flow, subject to certain exceptions, are required to be used to repay amounts outstanding under the 2012 Credit Agreement.

In February 2013, the Company entered into a two-year interest rate exchange agreement (a “Swap”), whereby the Company pays a fixed rate of 0.42% on $40 million of notional principal to Fifth Third Bank, and Fifth Third Bank pays to the Company a variable rate on the same amount of notional principal based on the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). This agreement was the Company’s only interest rate derivative designated as a cash flow hedge of interest rate risk outstanding as of February 28, 2014.

Table of Contents

restrictions with which we must comply include, among others, restrictions on additional indebtedness, incurrence of liens, engaging in businesses other than our primary business, paying certain dividends, redeeming or repurchasing capital stock of Emmis, acquisitions and asset sales. No default or event of default has occurred or is continuing. The 2012 Credit Agreement provides that an event of default will occur if there is a “change in control” of Emmis, as defined. The payment of principal, premium and interest under the 2012 Credit Agreement is fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by ECC and most of its existing wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. Substantially all of Emmis’ assets, including the stock of Emmis’ wholly-owned, domestic subsidiaries are pledged to secure the 2012 Credit Agreement.

SOURCES OF LIQUIDITY

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash provided by operations and cash available through revolver borrowings under our credit facility. Our primary uses of capital during the past few years have been, and are expected to continue to be, capital expenditures, working capital, debt service requirements, repayment of debt and investments in future growth opportunities in related businesses.

At February 28, 2014, we had cash and cash equivalents of $5.3 million and net working capital of $4.8 million. At February 28, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of $8.7 million and net working capital of $5.8 million. Cash and cash equivalents held at various European banking institutions at February 28, 2013 and 2014 was $6.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Since we manage cash on a consolidated basis, any cash needs of a particular segment or operating entity are met by intercompany transactions. See Investing Activities below for a discussion of specific segment needs.

Operating Activities

Cash flows provided by operating activities were $24.7 million and $1.8 million for the years ended February 28, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in cash flows provided by operating activities was mainly attributable to lower interest expense coupled with an increase in radio operating income.

Cash flows provided by operating activities were $3.8 million and $1.8 million for the years ended February 28 (29), 2012 and 2013, respectively. The decrease in cash flows provided by operating activities was mainly attributable to higher interest expense, partially offset by an increase in radio operating income.

Investing Activities

For the year ended February 28, 2014, cash used in investing activities of $5.4 million primarily consisted of $3.1 million of capital expenditures, $1.7 million related to the settlement of transaction fees and working capital adjustments associated with the sale of our Bulgarian and Slovakian radio operations which are included in discontinued operations and $0.7 million of additional investments, net of distributions from investments.

For the years ended February 28 (29), 2012 and 2013, cash flows provided by investing activities were $131.3 million and $114.0 million, respectively. These amounts mostly relate to cash received from the sale of our controlling interest in the Merlin Media Stations during fiscal 2012 of $130.0 million and the cash generated by our discontinued operations of $113.8 million in fiscal 2013, most of which related to the sale of Country Sampler and related publications, KXOS-FM and our Bulgarian and Slovakian radio operations.

Financing Activities

Cash flows used in financing activities were $22.8 million, $112.9 million and $135.3 million for the years ended February 28 (29) 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Cash used in financing activities for the year ended February 28, 2014 primarily relates to net payments related to our senior credit agreement and senior unsecured notes of $17.1 million, distributions to noncontrolling interests of $4.6 million and the settlement of tax withholding obligations of $1.1 million.

Cash used in financing activities for the year ended February 28, 2013 primarily relates to net payments related to our senior credit agreement and senior unsecured notes of $98.5 million, payments for other debt-related costs of $9.3 million and distributions to noncontrolling interests of $5.1 million.

Cash used in financing activities for the year ended February 29, 2012 primarily relates to net payments related to our senior credit agreement of $127.2 million, payments to either purchase or purchase rights in preferred stock of $31.7 million, payments for other debt-related costs of $4.2 million and distributions to noncontrolling interests of $4.2 million, all of which are partially offset by the issuance of senior unsecured notes of $31.9 million.

As of February 28, 2014, Emmis had $54.0 million of borrowings under the 2012 Credit Agreement ($8.0 million current and $46 million long-term), $74.9 million of non-recourse debt ($4.5 million current and $70.4 million long-term) and $46.5 million of Preferred Stock liquidation preference. Borrowings under the 2012 Credit Agreement debt bears interest, at our option, at a rate equal to the Eurodollar rate or an alternative Base Rate plus a margin. The non-recourse debt bears interest at

Table of Contents

4.1% per annum. As of February 28, 2014, our weighted average borrowing rate under our 2012 Credit Agreement including the effect of our interest rate exchange agreement was approximately 4.4%.

The debt service requirements of Emmis over the next twelve-month period are expected to be $9.8 million related to our 2012 Credit Agreement ($8.0 million of mandatory repayments of term notes and $1.8 million of interest related to our interest rate exchange agreement) and $7.5 million related to our 98.7FM non-recourse debt ($4.5 million of principal repayments and $3.0 million of interest payments). The Company expects that proceeds from the 98.7FM LMA will be sufficient to pay all debt service related to the 98.7FM non-recourse debt. The 2012 Credit Agreement debt bears interest at variable rates and is not included in the debt service requirements previously discussed.

On September 4, 2012, following approval by the Company’s shareholders, the Company filed amendments to its Articles of Incorporation that modify the rights of holders of the Company’s Preferred Stock. The amendments:


•	canceled the amount of undeclared dividends in respect of the Preferred Stock that were accumulated but undeclared on or prior to the effectiveness of the Proposed Amendments;

•

changed the designation of the Preferred Stock from “Cumulative” to “Non-Cumulative” and changed the rights of the holders of the Preferred Stock such that dividends or distributions on the Preferred Stock will not accumulate unless declared by the board of directors and subsequently not paid (and thereby effectively canceled associated rights to elect directors in the event of dividend arrearages);


•	canceled the restrictions on Emmis’ ability to pay dividends or make distributions on, or repurchase, its Common Stock or other junior stock prior to paying accumulated but undeclared dividends or distributions on the Preferred Stock;


•	changed the ability of the holders of the Preferred Stock to require Emmis to repurchase all of such holders’ Preferred Stock upon certain going-private transactions in which an affiliate of Mr. Smulyan participates that do not constitute a change of control transaction, to cause the holders of the Preferred Stock to no longer have such ability;


•	changed the ability of the holders of the Preferred Stock to convert all of such Preferred Stock to Class A Common Stock upon a change of control at specified conversion prices to cause the holders of the Preferred Stock to no longer have such ability;


•	changed the ability of holders of the Preferred Stock to vote as a separate class on a plan of merger, share exchange, sale of assets or similar transaction to the ability to vote with the Common Stock on an as-converted basis (except as may otherwise be required by law); and


•	changed the conversion price adjustment applicable to certain merger, reclassification and other transactions to provide that the Preferred Stock converts into the right to receive property that would have been receivable had such Preferred Stock been converted into Class A Common Stock immediately prior to such transaction.

As a result of the elimination of the rights of holders of Preferred Stock to require Emmis to repurchase all of such holders’ Preferred Stock in certain going-private transactions, the Preferred Stock was reclassified from temporary equity to permanent equity. Additionally, the cancellation of the cumulative feature of the Preferred Stock and the cancellation of accumulated but undeclared preferred dividends modified earnings per share calculations as the numerator in the calculation no longer includes undeclared preferred dividends. Certain holders of our Preferred Stock have challenged the validity of these amendments. See further discussion under Item 3, Legal Proceedings

As of May 2, 2014, we had $16.0 million available for additional borrowing under our credit facility. Availability under the credit facility depends upon our continued compliance with certain operating covenants and financial ratios. Emmis was in compliance with these covenants as of February 28, 2014. As part of our business strategy, we continually evaluate potential acquisitions of radio stations, publishing properties and other businesses that we believe hold promise for long-term appreciation in value and leverage our strengths. However, Emmis Operating Company’s credit facility substantially limits our ability to make acquisitions. To consummate the announced acquisition of WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM in New York, we will refinance our existing credit facility. We also regularly review our portfolio of assets and may opportunistically dispose of assets when we believe it is appropriate to do so. See Note 8 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of various dispositions that occurred during the three years ended February 2014.

Table of Contents

SUMMARY DISCLOSURES ABOUT CONTRACTUAL CASH OBLIGATIONS

The following table reflects a summary of our contractual cash obligations as of February 28, 2014:



	Payments Due by Period
	(Amounts in 000's)
		Less than	1 to 3	3 to 5	More than
Contractual cash obligations:	Total	1 Year	Years	Years	5 Years

Long-term debt ¹	153,952	17,697	35,109	48,015	53,131
Operating leases	58,545	7,921	14,762	12,715	23,147
Purchase obligations ²	24,271	15,579	7,869	823	—
Total contractual cash obligations	236,768	41,197	57,740	61,553	76,278

¹ Includes an estimate of interest expense on amounts outstanding related to our Credit Agreement as of February 28, 2014 using our weighted average interest rate as of the same date as well as interest due under our 98.7FM nonrecourse debt. See Note 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements included in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for more discussion of our long-term debt.

² Includes contractual commitments to purchase goods and services, including employment agreements, radio broadcast agreements, audience measurement information and music license fees.

INTANGIBLES

As of February 28, 2014, approximately 62% of our total assets consisted of intangible assets, such as FCC broadcast licenses, goodwill, and trademarks, the value of which depends significantly upon the operational results of our businesses. In the case of our radio stations, we would not be able to operate the properties without the related FCC license for each property. FCC licenses are renewed every eight years; consequently, we continually monitor the activities of our stations for compliance with regulatory requirements. Historically, all of our FCC licenses have been renewed (or a waiver has been granted pending renewal) at the end of their respective eight-year periods, and we expect that all of our FCC licenses will continue to be renewed in the future.

SEASONALITY

Our results of operations are usually subject to seasonal fluctuations, which result in higher second and third quarter revenues and operating income. For our radio operations, this seasonality is due to the younger demographic composition of many of our stations. Advertisers increase spending during the summer months to target these listeners. In addition, advertisers generally increase spending across all segments during the months of October and November, which are part of our third quarter, in anticipation of the holiday season.

INFLATION

The impact of inflation on operations has not been significant to date. However, there can be no assurance that a high rate of inflation in the future would not have an adverse effect on operating results, particularly since a significant portion of our senior bank debt is comprised of variable-rate debt.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCINGS AND LIABILITIES

Other than interest rate swap agreements, which are discussed in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, and lease commitments, legal contingencies incurred in the normal course of business, contractual commitments to purchase goods and services and employment contracts for key employees, all of which are discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company does not have any material off-balance sheet financings or liabilities. The Company does not have any majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries that are not included in the consolidated financial statements, nor does the Company have any interests in or relationships with any “special-purpose entities” that are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements or disclosed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

General

Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of Emmis due to adverse changes in financial and commodity market prices and rates. Emmis is exposed to market risk from changes in domestic and international interest rates (i.e. prime and LIBOR). To manage interest-rate exposure, Emmis periodically enters into interest-rate derivative agreements. Emmis does not use financial instruments for trading and is not a party to any leveraged derivatives.

Table of Contents

Interest Rates

Under the terms of its 2012 Credit Agreement, the Company is required to fix or cap the interest rate on at least 50% of its Term Loan exposure for a two-year period ending December 28, 2014. The requirement to fix or cap interest rates can be reduced to a one-year period provided the Company’s Senior Leverage Ratio (as defined in the 2012 Credit Agreement) is at or under 2.50:1:00 as of May 31, 2014. In February 2013, the Company entered into a two-year interest rate exchange agreement (a “Swap”), whereby the Company pays a fixed rate of 0.42% on $40 million of notional principal to Fifth Third Bank, and Fifth Third Bank pays to the Company a variable rate on the same amount of notional principal based on the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”).

Based on amounts outstanding at February 28, 2014, if the interest rate on our variable debt were to increase by 1.0%, our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $0.1 million.

Table of Contents

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Emmis Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Emmis Communications Corporation as of February 28, 2013 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 28, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Emmis Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries at February 28, 2013 and 2014, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 28, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Emmis Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated May 8, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana

May 8, 2014

Table of Contents

EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012			2013			2014
NET REVENUES	$	202,218		$	196,084		$	205,146
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense of $3,335, $2,769 and $2,711 respectively	167,294			154,071			159,009
Corporate expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense of $1,390, $1,953 and $2,155 respectively	19,096			17,819			17,024
Hungary license litigation expense	871			1,381			2,058
Impairment loss on intangible assets	—			11,419			—
Depreciation and amortization	4,725			4,722			4,866
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets	798			(9,877		)	(8		)
Total operating expenses	192,784			179,535			182,949
OPERATING INCOME	9,434			16,549			22,197
OTHER EXPENSE:
Interest expense	(19,904		)	(20,899		)	(7,068		)
Loss on debt extinguishment	(2,006		)	(4,508		)	(653		)
Gain on sale of controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC	31,865			—			—
Other (expense) income, net	(15,951		)	(10		)	116
Total other expense	(5,996		)	(25,417		)	(7,605		)
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS	3,438			(8,868		)	14,592
BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES	(32,287		)	(7,039		)	(34,063		)
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS	35,725			(1,829		)	48,655
(LOSS) INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX	(4,997		)	50,080			—
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME	30,728			48,251			48,655
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS	4,535			4,479			5,174
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE COMPANY	26,193			43,772			43,481
GAIN ON EXTINGUISHMENT OF PREFERRED STOCK	61,892			—			325
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS	(8,591		)	(1,806		)	—
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS	$	79,494		$	41,966		$	43,806

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS – (CONTINUED)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012			2013			2014
Amounts attributable to common shareholders for basic earnings per share:
Continuing operations	84,443			(8,114		)	43,806
Discontinued operations	(4,949		)	50,080			—
Net income attributable to common shareholders	79,494			41,966			43,806
Amounts attributable to common shareholders for diluted earnings per share:
Continuing operations	31,142			(8,114		)	43,481
Discontinued operations	(4,949		)	50,080			—
Net income attributable to common shareholders	26,193			41,966			43,481
Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders:
Continuing operations	$	2.21		$	(0.21	)	$	1.08
Discontinued operations, net of tax	(0.13		)	1.29			—
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	2.08		$	1.08		$	1.08
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	38,293			39,034			40,506
Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders:
Continuing operations	$	0.69		$	(0.21	)	$	0.94
Discontinued operations, net of tax	(0.11		)	1.29			—
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	0.58		$	1.08		$	0.94
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	44,953			39,034			46,042

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)



	For the year ended February 28 (29),
	2012			2013			2014
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME	$	30,728		$	48,251		$	48,655
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME:
Change in value of derivative instrument	(489		)	(107		)	8
Cumulative translation adjustment	(156		)	(1,249		)	(8		)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	30,083			46,895			48,655
LESS: COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS	4,476			4,431			5,155
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS	$	25,607		$	42,464		$	43,500

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)



	FEBRUARY 28,
	2013		2014
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,735	$	5,304
Restricted cash	1,426		2,239
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $523 and $574, respectively	28,126		31,000
Prepaid expenses	7,674		8,582
Deferred tax asset	—		4,882
Other	3,985		2,005
Current assets—discontinued operations	762		—
Total current assets	50,708		54,012
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
Land and buildings	25,544		25,593
Leasehold improvements	12,814		13,860
Broadcasting equipment	37,987		40,013
Office equipment and automobiles	30,072		31,262
Construction in progress	496		239
	106,913		110,967
Less-accumulated depreciation and amortization	74,360		78,736
Total property and equipment, net	32,553		32,231
INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
Indefinite lived intangibles	150,522		150,558
Goodwill	12,639		12,639
Other intangibles	749		810
	163,910		164,007
Less-accumulated amortization	524		548
Total intangible assets, net	163,386		163,459
OTHER ASSETS:
Deferred debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $217 and $577, respectively	3,533		3,178
Investments	7,889		7,181
Deposits and other	3,555		5,287
Total other assets, net	14,977		15,646
Total assets	$	261,624	$	265,348

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS – (CONTINUED)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)



	FEBRUARY 28,
	2013			2014
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	8,301		$	8,958
Current maturities of long-term debt	12,126			12,541
Accrued salaries and commissions	7,535			8,552
Deferred revenue	10,862			11,506
Share-based compensation arrangement	—			2,926
Other	3,914			4,767
Current liabilities—discontinued operations	2,169			—
Total current liabilities	44,907			49,250
LONG-TERM DEBT, NET OF CURRENT PORTION	131,494			114,926
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES	10,052			8,021
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES	38,072			9,783
Total liabilities	224,525			181,980
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 12)
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 170,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 35,907,925 shares and 37,267,123 shares at February 28, 2013 and 2014, respectively	359			373
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 30,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 4,722,684 shares 4,569,464 shares at February 28, 2013 and 2014, respectively.	47			46
Class C common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 30,000,000 shares; none issued	—			—
Series A convertible preferred stock. $.01 par value; $50.00 liquidation preference per share, aggregate liquidation preference and redemption amount of $46,882 and $46,450 at February 28, 2013 and 2014, respectively; authorized 2,875,000 shares; issued and outstanding 1,337,641 shares at February 28, 2013 and 1,328,991 at February 28, 2014, both of which include 400,000 shares in trust (Note 3)	9			9
Additional paid-in capital	578,555			580,776
Accumulated deficit	(588,836		)	(545,355		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(118		)	(99		)
Total shareholders’ (deficit) equity	(9,984		)	35,750
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS	47,083			47,618
Total equity	37,099			83,368
Total liabilities and equity	$	261,624		$	265,348

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2014

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)



	Class A Common Stock			Class B Common Stock					Series A Preferred Stock
	Shares	Amount		Shares		Amount			Shares		Amount
BALANCE, FEBRUARY 28, 2011	33,499,770	$	335	4,722,684		$	47		—		$	—
Net income	—	—		—		—			—		—
Exercise of stock options and related income tax benefits	10,000	—		—		—			—		—
Issuance of Common Stock to employees and officers and related income tax benefits	497,509	5		—		—			—		—
Acquisition of additional controlling interests	—	—		—		—			—		—
Payments of dividends and distributions to noncontrolling interests
Preferred stock transactions
Cumulative translation adjustment	—	—		—		—			—		—
Change in value of derivative instrument	—	—		—		—			—		—
BALANCE, FEBRUARY 29, 2012	34,007,279	$	340	4,722,684		$	47		—		$	—
Net income	—	—		—		—			—		—
Exercise of stock options and related income tax benefits	784,376	8		—		—			—		—
Issuance of Common Stock to employees and officers and related income tax benefits	605,205	6		—		—			—		—
Issuance of Common Stock in exchange for cancellation of stock options	511,065	5		—		—			—		—
Payments of dividends and distributions to noncontrolling interests	—	—		—		—			—		—
Reclassify preferred stock from mezzanine	—	—		—		—			937,641		9
Cumulative translation adjustment	—	—		—		—			—		—
Change in value of derivative instrument	—	—		—		—			—		—
BALANCE, FEBRUARY 28, 2013	35,907,925	$	359	4,722,684		$	47		937,641		$	9
Net income	—	—		—		—			—		—
Exercise of stock options and related income tax benefits	425,800	4		—		—			—		—
Issuance of Common Stock to employees and officers and related income tax benefits	780,178	9		—		—			—		—
Conversion of Class B to Class A	153,220	1		(153,220	)	(1		)
Purchase of preferred stock	—	—		—		—			(8,650	)	—
Payments of dividends and distributions to noncontrolling interests	—	—		—		—			—		—
Cumulative translation adjustment	—	—		—		—			—		—
Change in value of derivative instrument	—	—		—		—			—		—
BALANCE, FEBRUARY 28, 2014	37,267,123	$	373	4,569,464		$	46		928,991		$	9

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (DEFICIT) – (CONTINUED)

FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2014

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)



	Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity (Deficit)
BALANCE, FEBRUARY 28, 2011	$	528,786		$	(720,693	)	$	1,776		$	47,764		$	(141,985	)
Net income	—			26,193			—			4,535			30,728
Exercise of stock options and related income tax benefits	3			—			—			—			3
Issuance of Common Stock to employees and officers and related income tax benefits	1,004			—			—			—			1,009
Acquisition of additional controlling interests	—			—			—			(246		)	(246		)
Payments of dividends and distributions to noncontrolling interests	—			—			—			(4,152		)	(4,152		)
Preferred stock transactions	—			61,892			—			—			61,892
Cumulative translation adjustment	—			—			(97		)	(59		)	(156		)
Change in value of derivative instrument	—			—			(489		)	—			(489		)
BALANCE, FEBRUARY 29, 2012	$	529,793		$	(632,608	)	$	1,190		$	47,842		$	(53,396	)
Net income	—			43,772			—			4,479			48,251
Exercise of stock options and related income tax benefits	294			—			—			—			302
Issuance of Common Stock to employees and officers and related income tax benefits	1,595			—			—			—			1,601
Acquisition of additional controlling interests	—			—			—			—			5
Payments of dividends and distributions to noncontrolling interests	—			—			—			(5,103		)	(5,103		)
Reclassify preferred stock from mezzanine	46,873			—			—			—			46,882
Cumulative translation adjustment	—			—			(1,201		)	(48		)	(1,249		)
Change in value of derivative instrument	—			—			(107		)	—			(107		)
BALANCE, FEBRUARY 28, 2013	$	578,555		$	(588,836	)	$	(118	)	$	47,083		$	37,099
Net income	—			43,481			—			5,174			48,655
Exercise of stock options and related income tax benefits	325			—			—			—			329
Issuance of Common Stock to employees and officers and related income tax benefits	2,003			—			—			—			2,012
Conversion of Class B to Class A	—			—			—			—			—
Purchase of preferred stock	(107		)	—			—			—			(107		)
Payments of dividends and distributions to noncontrolling interests	—			—			—			(4,620		)	(4,620		)
Cumulative translation adjustment	—			—			11			(19		)	(8		)
Change in value of derivative instrument	—			—			8			—			8
BALANCE, FEBRUARY 28, 2014	$	580,776		$	(545,355	)	$	(99	)	$	47,618		$	83,368

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)



	FOR THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28 (29),
	2012			2013			2014
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Consolidated net income	$	30,728		$	48,251		$	48,655
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities—
Discontinued operations	4,997			(50,080		)	—
Gain on sale of controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC	(31,865		)	—			—
Impairment losses on intangible assets	—			11,419			—
Loss on debt extinguishment	2,006			4,508			653
Accretion of debt instruments to interest expense	4,968			13,240			—
Amortization of deferred financing costs, including original issue discount	819			953			838
Depreciation and amortization	4,725			4,722			4,866
Provision for bad debts	232			86			510
Benefit for deferred income taxes	(34,326		)	(6,519		)	(33,176		)
Noncash compensation	1,092			2,942			4,884
Loss (gain) on equity method investments including other-than-temporary impairment	16,068			302			(96		)
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets	797			(9,877		)	(8		)
Changes in assets and liabilities—
Restricted cash	—			(1,426		)	(813		)
Accounts receivable	4,915			632			(3,256		)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	1,290			480			1,638
Other assets	(310		)	(438		)	(1,831		)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	981			(4,501		)	1,704
Deferred revenue	(791		)	(1,608		)	644
Income taxes	1,865			(1,852		)	(686		)
Other liabilities	(1,110		)	(9,294		)	237
Net cash used in operating activities—discontinued operations	(3,323		)	(95		)	(68		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	3,758			1,845			24,695
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property and equipment	(5,122		)	(3,364		)	(3,057		)
Proceeds from the sale of assets	160			10,006			11
Cash paid for investments, net of distributions	—			(6,489		)	(659		)
Sale of controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC	130,000			—			—
Distributions from equity method investments	1,308			73			—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities—discontinued operations	4,945			113,760			(1,650		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	131,291			113,986			(5,355		)

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – (CONTINUED)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)



	FOR THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28 (29),
	2012			2013			2014
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Payments on long-term debt	(146,151		)	(279,716		)	(24,126		)
Proceeds from long-term debt	50,941			181,198			7,000
Settlement of tax withholding obligations	(86		)	(220		)	(1,071		)
Dividends and distributions paid to noncontrolling interests	(4,152		)	(5,103		)	(4,620		)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases	—			302			325
Payments for debt related costs	(4,191		)	(9,343		)	(164		)
Acquisition of rights in and purchase of preferred stock	(31,685		)	—			(107		)
Other	3			—			—
Net cash used in financing activities	(135,321		)	(112,882		)	(22,763		)
Effect of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents	(177		)	167			(8		)
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(449		)	3,116			(3,431		)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of period	6,068			5,619			8,735
End of period	$	5,619		$	8,735		$	5,304
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
Cash paid for (refund from)—
Interest	$	25,368		$	21,811		$	6,289
Income taxes	1,007			2,175			(903		)
Non-cash financing transactions—
Value of stock issued to employees under stock compensation program and to satisfy accrued incentives	1,090			1,798			3,074

The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a. Principles of Consolidation

The following discussion pertains to Emmis Communications Corporation (“ECC”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Emmis,” the “Company,” or “we”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

b. Organization

Emmis is a diversified media company with radio broadcasting and magazine publishing operations. We own and operate three FM radio stations serving the nation’s top two markets – New York and Los Angeles, although one station in New York is operated pursuant to a Local Programming and Marketing Agreement ("LMA") whereby a third party provides the programming for the station and sells all advertising within that programming. On March 1, 2014, we began operating two additional stations in New York (one FM and one AM) pursuant to an LMA. See Note 1e below for more discussion of LMAs. Additionally, we own and operate fifteen FM and three AM radio stations with strong positions in St. Louis, Austin (we have a 50.1% controlling interest in our radio stations located there), Indianapolis and Terre Haute. In addition to our radio businesses, we operate a radio news network in Indiana, and publish Texas Monthly, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Indianapolis Monthly, Cincinnati and Orange Coast.

Substantially all of ECC’s business is conducted through its subsidiaries. Our credit agreement, dated December 28, 2012 (the “2012 Credit Agreement”), contains certain provisions that may restrict the ability of ECC’s subsidiaries to transfer funds to ECC in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances.

c. Revenue Recognition

d. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

An allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded based on management’s judgment of the collectability of receivables. When assessing the collectability of receivables, management considers, among other things, historical loss experience and existing economic conditions. The activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the three years ended February 28, 2014 was as follows:



	Balance At Beginning Of Year		Provision		Write-Offs			Balance At End Of Year
Year ended February 28, 2012	$	1,359	$	232	$	(576	)	$	1,015
Year ended February 28, 2013	1,015		86		(578		)	523
Year ended February 28, 2014	523		510		(459		)	574

e. Local Programming and Marketing Agreement Fees

The Company from time to time enters into LMAs in connection with acquisitions and dispositions of radio stations, pending regulatory approval of transfer of the FCC licenses. Under the terms of these agreements, the acquiring company makes specified periodic payments to the holder of the FCC license in exchange for the right to program and sell advertising for a specified portion of the station’s inventory of broadcast time. The acquiring company records revenues and expenses associated with the portion of the station’s inventory of broadcast time it manages. Nevertheless, as the holder of the FCC license, the owner-operator retains control and responsibility for the operation of the station, including responsibility over all programming broadcast on the station.

Table of Contents

Active LMAs

On February 11, 2014, the Company entered into an LMA in connection with its agreement to purchase WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM in New York City from YMF Media New York LLC and YMF Media New York License LLC (collectively, "YMF"). The LMA, which commenced on March 1, 2014, gives Emmis the right to program and sell advertising for the two New York stations. Emmis will pay YMF $1.3 million per month and reimburse YMF for certain monthly expenses. After the first closing of the transaction, the LMA will continue in effect until the 2nd closing at a reduced monthly fee of approximately $0.7 million. This LMA had no effect on our results of operations for the three years ended February 2014 as it did not commence until March 1, 2014. See Note 8 for more discussion of the Company's pending purchase of WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM from YMF.

On April 26, 2012, the Company entered into an LMA with New York AM Radio, LLC (“98.7FM Programmer”) pursuant to which, commencing April 30, 2012, 98.7FM Programmer purchased from Emmis the right to provide programming on 98.7FM until August 31, 2024. Disney Enterprises, Inc., the parent company of 98.7FM Programmer, has guaranteed the obligations of 98.7FM Programmer under the LMA. The Company retains ownership and control of the Station, including the related FCC license during the term of the LMA and received an annual fee from 98.7FM Programmer of $8.4 million for the first year of the term under the LMA, which fee increases by 3.5% each year thereafter until the LMA’s termination. This LMA fee revenue is recorded on a straight-line basis over the term of the LMA. Emmis retains the FCC license of 98.7FM after the term of the LMA expires.

Terminated LMAs

On April 3, 2009, Emmis entered into an LMA and a Put and Call Agreement for KXOS-FM in Los Angeles with a subsidiary of Grupo Radio Centro, S.A.B. de C.V (“GRC”), a Mexican broadcasting company. The LMA for KXOS-FM started on April 15, 2009 and terminated upon the sale of the station on August 23, 2012 (see Note 8 for more discussion of the sale transaction).

On June 20, 2011, Emmis entered into an LMA for WRXP-FM in New York, WKQX-FM in Chicago and WLUP-FM in Chicago with LMA Merlin Media LLC. The LMA for these stations started on July 15, 2011 and terminated upon the sale of a controlling interest in these stations on September 1, 2011 (see Note 8 for more discussion of the sale transaction).

LMA fees were recorded as net revenues (except for discontinued operations) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and were as follows for the years ended February 2012, 2013 and 2014:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		2014
Continuing Operations:
98.7FM, New York	$	—	$	8,609	$	10,331
Merlin Media	310		—		—
Total	$	310	$	8,609	$	10,331
Discontinued Operations:
KXOS-FM, Los Angeles	$	7,000	$	3,331	$	—

f. Share-based Compensation

The Company determines the fair value of its employee stock options at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the value of exchange-traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. The Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different than these traded options. In addition, option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility and expected term of the options granted. The Company relies heavily upon historical data of its stock price when determining expected volatility, but each year the Company reassesses whether or not historical data is representative of expected results. See Notes 3 and 4 for more discussion of share-based compensation.

g. Cash and Cash Equivalents

Emmis considers time deposits, money market fund shares and all highly liquid debt investment instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At times, such deposits may be in excess of FDIC insurance limits.

Table of Contents

h. Restricted Cash

Restricted cash generally represents either cash on deposit in trust accounts related to our 98.7FM LMA in New York City that services long-term debt as discussed in Note 5, or cash collected by our wholly-owned subsidiary, NextRadio LLC. Usage of cash collected by NextRadio LLC is restricted for specific purposes by funding agreements. For more discussion of NextRadio LLC, see Note 9.

i. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is generally computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which are 39 years for buildings, the shorter of economic life or expected lease term for leasehold improvements, five to seven years for broadcasting equipment, five years for automobiles, and three to five years for office equipment. Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are expensed as incurred; improvements are capitalized. On a continuing basis, the Company reviews the carrying value of property and equipment for impairment. If events or changes in circumstances were to indicate that an asset carrying value may not be recoverable, a write-down of the asset would be recorded through a charge to operations. See Note 1r for more discussion of impairment losses related to our property and equipment. Depreciation expense for the years ended February 2012, 2013 and 2014 was $4.7 million, $4.7 million and $4.8 million, respectively.

j. Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Indefinite-lived Intangibles and Goodwill

In connection with past acquisitions, a significant amount of the purchase price was allocated to radio broadcasting licenses, goodwill and other intangible assets. Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible net assets acquired. In accordance with ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other,” goodwill and radio broadcasting licenses are not amortized, but are tested at least annually for impairment at the reporting unit level and unit of accounting level, respectively. We test for impairment annually, on December 1 of each year, or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances or other conditions suggest impairment may have occurred. Impairment exists when the asset carrying values exceed their respective fair values, and the excess is then recorded to operations as an impairment charge. See Note 10, Intangible Assets and Goodwill, for more discussion of our interim and annual impairment tests performed during the three years ended February 28, 2014.

Definite-lived Intangibles

The Company’s definite-lived intangible assets are trademarks which are amortized over the period of time the trademarks are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the Company’s future cash flows.

k. Discontinued operations and assets held for sale

The results of operations and related disposal gains and losses for business units that the Company has sold, expects to sell, or has ceased operations are classified in discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Table of Contents

A summary of the income from discontinued operations is presented below:



	Year ended February 28 (29),
	2012			2013			2014
Income (loss) from operations:
Slager (Radio)	$	(312	)	$	—		$	—
Flint Peak Tower Site (Radio)	1			—			—
KXOS-FM (Radio)	(261		)	(223		)	—
Emmis Interactive Inc. (Radio)	(4,692		)	(2,815		)	—
Slovakia Radio Network (Radio)	1,160			782			—
Bulgaria Radio Network (Radio)	(618		)	(810		)	—
Sampler Publications (Publishing)	387			(171		)	—
Total	(4,335		)	(3,237		)	—
Provision for income taxes	5,544			532			—
Loss from operations, net of tax	(9,879		)	(3,769		)	—
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations:
Flint Peak Tower Site (Radio)	4,882			—			—
KXOS-FM (Radio)	—			32,757			—
Emmis Interactive Inc. (Radio)	—			(654		)	—
Slovakia Radio Network (Radio)	—			14,798			—
Bulgaria Radio Network (Radio)	—			(1,254		)	—
Sampler Publications (Publishing)	—			695			—
Total	4,882			46,342			—
Benefit for income taxes	—			(7,507		)	—
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax	4,882			53,849			—
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	(4,997	)	$	50,080		$	—

Discontinued Operation – Slovakia Radio

On February 25, 2013, Emmis completed the sale of its Slovakian radio network to Bauer Ausland 1 GMBH for $21.2 million in cash. Emmis believed the sale of its international radio properties would better enable the Company to focus its efforts on its domestic radio stations. In connection with the sale, Emmis recorded a gain on sale of assets of approximately $14.8 million, which is included in income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Emmis included the results of operations of its Slovakian radio network for the period January 1, 2012 through the sale of the network on February 25, 2013 in discontinued operations in its year ended February 28, 2013. Net income of the Slovakia radio network for the period beginning January 1, 2013 through the sale of the network on February 25, 2013 was not material.

Table of Contents

The operations of our Slovakian radio network had historically been included in the radio segment. The following table summarizes certain operating results of our Slovakian radio network for all periods presented:



	For the year ended February 28 (29),
	2012			2013			2014
Net revenues	$	12,111		$	11,375		$	—
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense	8,151			8,663			—
Depreciation and amortization	1,291			781			—
Gain on sale of assets	—			244			—
Interest expense	1,517			1,461			—
Other income, net	(8		)	(68		)	—
Gain on sale of business	—			14,798			—
Provision for income taxes	644			532			—

Discontinued Operation – Bulgaria Radio

The operations of our Bulgarian radio network had historically been included in the radio segment. The following table summarizes certain operating results of our Bulgarian radio network for all periods presented:



	For the year ended February 28 (29),
	2012			2013			2014
Net revenues	$	1,407		$	1,152		$	—
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense	1,990			1,769			—
Depreciation and amortization	239			174			—
Other expense (income), net	(204		)	19			—
Loss on sale of business	—			(1,254		)	—

Discontinued Operation — Emmis Interactive

On October 31, 2012, Emmis completed the sale of Emmis Interactive Inc., a subsidiary of Emmis that provided a content management system, data analytic tools and related services, to Marketron Broadcast Solutions, LLC (“Marketron”) for no net proceeds. The sale of Emmis Interactive Inc. allowed Emmis to mitigate expected future operating losses and focus its efforts on its domestic radio operations and other promising technology initiatives. Marketron assumed operating control of Emmis Interactive, Inc., on October 4, 2012. In connection with the sale, Emmis recorded a loss on sale of assets of approximately $0.7 million, which is primarily related to severance for former employees and is included in income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Table of Contents

The operations of Emmis Interactive Inc. had historically been included in the radio segment. The following table summarizes certain operating results of Emmis Interactive Inc. for all periods presented:



	For the year ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013			2014
Net revenues	$	4,809	$	2,743		$	—
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense	8,656		4,698			—
Depreciation and amortization	845		257			—
Other income, net	—		(134		)	—
Impairment loss	—		737			—
Loss on sale of business	—		(654		)	—

Discontinued Operation – Country Sampler, Smart Retailer and related publications

On October 1, 2012, Emmis completed the sale of Country Sampler magazine, Smart Retailer magazine, and related publications (altogether the “Sampler Publications”) and certain real estate used in their operations to subsidiaries of DRG Holdings, LLC. Emmis believed the sale of the Sampler Publications, which were niche crafting publications, would enable it to more clearly focus on its core city and regional publications. Emmis received gross proceeds from the sale of $8.7 million, incurred approximately $0.2 million in transaction expenses and tax obligations, and used the remaining $8.5 million to repay term loans under the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated November 2, 2006, as further amended (the "2006 Credit Agreement"). In connection with the sale, Emmis recorded a gain on sale of assets of approximately $0.7 million, which is included in income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

In accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 205-20-45, the Company allocated interest expense associated with the estimate of term loans required to be repaid as a result of the sale of the Sampler Publications to its operations for all periods presented.

The operations of the Sampler Publications had historically been included in the publishing segment. The following table summarizes certain operating results of the Sampler Publications for all periods presented:



	For the year ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013			2014
Net revenues	$	8,462	$	5,298		$	—
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense	7,250		4,985			—
Depreciation and amortization	86		44			—
Loss on disposal of assets	23		—			—
Interest expense	716		440			—
Gain on sale of business	—		695			—
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	516		(2,764		)	—

Discontinued Operation – KXOS-FM

In accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 205-20-45, the Company allocated interest expense associated with the portion of term loans required to be repaid as a result of the sale of KXOS-FM to its operations for all periods presented.

Table of Contents

The operations of KXOS-FM had historically been included in the radio segment. The following table summarizes certain operating results of KXOS-FM for all periods presented:



	For the years ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013			2014
Net revenues	$	7,000	$	3,331		$	—
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense	93		27			—
Depreciation and amortization expense	462		169			—
Gain on sale of assets	1		—			—
Interest expense	6,707		3,358			—
Gain on sale of station, net of taxes	—		32,757			—
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	4,384		(4,743		)	—

Discontinued Operation – Flint Peak Tower Site

On April 6, 2011, Emmis sold land, towers and other equipment at its Glendale, CA tower site (the “Flint Peak Tower Site”) to Richland Towers Management Flint, Inc. for $6.0 million in cash. In connection with the sale, Emmis recorded a gain on sale of assets of approximately $4.9 million. Net proceeds from the sale were used to repay amounts outstanding under the 2006 Credit Agreement.

The operations of the Flint Peak Tower Site had historically been included in the radio segment. The following table summarizes certain operating results for the Flint Peak Tower Site for all periods presented:



	Year ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		2014
Net revenues	$	59	$	—	$	—
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense	51		—		—
Depreciation and amortization	7		—		—
Gain on sale of assets	4,882		—		—

Discontinued Operation – Slager

On October 28, 2009, the Hungarian National Radio and Television Board (ORTT) announced that it awarded to another bidder the national radio license then held by our majority-owned subsidiary, Slager. Slager ceased broadcasting effective November 19, 2009. We are seeking equitable relief through the International Centre for Settlement of Investments Disputes (“ICSID”) as we believe the award of the license by the ORTT to another bidder violated law and various bilateral agreements. For developments related to our ICSID case that occurred subsequent to February 28, 2014, see Note 18, Subsequent Events.

Slager had historically been included in the radio segment. The following table summarizes certain operating results for Slager for all periods presented:



	Year ended February 28 (29),
	2012			2013		2014
Net revenues	$	30		$	—	$	—
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense	344			—		—
Other income (expense), net	2			—		—
Net loss attributable to minority interests	(48		)	—		—

Table of Contents

Summary of Assets and Liabilities of Discontinued Operations:



	As of February 28,
	2013		2014
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	579	$	—
Accounts receivable, net	128		—
Prepaid expenses	17		—
Income tax receivable	34		—
Other	4		—
Total current assets	762		—
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	2,169	$	—
Accrued salaries and commissions	—		—
Deferred revenue	—		—
Other current liabilities	—		—
Total current liabilities	2,169		—

l. Advertising and Subscription Acquisition Costs

Advertising and subscription acquisition costs are expensed the first time the advertising takes place, except for certain direct-response advertising related to the identification of new magazine subscribers, the primary purpose of which is to elicit sales from customers who can be shown to have responded specifically to the advertising and that results in probable future economic benefits. When determining probable future economic benefits, the Company includes in its analysis future revenues from renewals if sufficient operating history exists. These direct-response advertising costs are capitalized as assets and amortized over the estimated period of future benefit, ranging from six months to two years subsequent to the promotional event. As of each balance sheet date, the Company evaluates the realizability of capitalized direct-response advertising by comparing the carrying value of such assets on a campaign-by-campaign basis to the probable remaining future primary net revenues expected to result directly from such advertising. If the carrying amounts of such advertising exceed the remaining future primary net revenues that are likely to be realized from such advertising, the excess is recorded as advertising expense immediately. No direct-response advertising costs were capitalized as of the years ended February 28, 2013 and 2014. Advertising expense for the years ended February 2012, 2013 and 2014 was $4.6 million, $4.1 million and $2.8 million, respectively.

m. Investments

For those investments in common stock or in-substance common stock in which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the investee, the investment is accounted for under the equity method. For other investments held at February 28, 2014, the Company applies the accounting guidance for certain investments in debt and equity securities. Emmis’ equity method investments report on a fiscal year ending December 31, which Emmis incorporates into its fiscal year ended February 28.

Emmis has various investments, the carrying values of which are summarized in the following table and discussed below:



	For the years ending February 28 (29),
	2013		2014
Available-for-sale investments	$	6,500	$	6,750
Equity method investment—Texas tower partnership	1,389		—
Other equity method investments	—		431
Total investments	$	7,889	$	7,181

Table of Contents

Equity method investments

Emmis, through its partnership in the Austin market, owned a 25% ownership interest in a company that held a tower site in Austin, Texas. Emmis, through its partnership in the Austin market, purchased the Texas tower partnership during the year ended February 28, 2014.

In connection with the sale of its controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC on September 1, 2011, the Company retained an initial 20.6% common equity interest in Merlin Media LLC. The fair value of this common equity interest as of September 1, 2011, was approximately $5.6 million. Emmis determined that the investment in the common equity of Merlin Media LLC was impaired at February 29, 2012 and the impairment was other-than-temporary. As such, Emmis recognized an impairment loss of $3.1 million recorded in other income (expense), net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related to its common equity investment. Emmis previously recorded $2.5 million of equity method losses prior to recognizing the investment impairment. The impairment loss reduced the carrying value of the investment in Merlin Media LLC common equity to zero as of February 29, 2012. See Note 8 for more discussion of the sale of a controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC and Note 15 for discussion of other income (expense), net.

Available for sale investments

Emmis’ available for sale investments are investments in the preferred shares of non-public companies. These investments are accounted for under the provisions of ASC 320.

Emmis made investments totaling $0.5 million in iBiquity, Inc, a company that specializes in digital radio transmission technology. During the years ended February 2012 and 2013, Emmis recorded noncash impairment charges of less than $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in other income (expense), net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, as it deemed the investment was impaired and the impairment was other-than-temporary. The impairment charge recorded during the year ended February 28, 2013 reduced the carrying value of this investment to zero as of February 28, 2013.

During the year ended February 28, 2013, Emmis made investments totaling $6.0 million in Courseload, Inc, a provider of online textbooks and other course material. Emmis made an additional investment of $0.25 million in Courseload, Inc. during the year ended February 28, 2014. This investment is carried at fair value, which the Company determined approximates the original acquisition cost of $6.25 million.

During the year ended February 28, 2013, Emmis made investments totaling $0.5 million in TuneIn, Inc., an on-line access point for over-the-air radio streams and other on-demand audio programming such as podcasts, interviews and concerts. This investment is carried at fair value, which the Company believes approximates the original acquisition cost of $0.5 million.

Although no unrealized or realized gains or losses have been recognized on these investments, unrealized gains and losses would be reported in other comprehensive income until realized, at which point they would be recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. If the Company determines that the value of an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired, the Company will recognize, through the statements of operations, a loss on the investment.

Cost method investment

In connection with the sale of its controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC on September 1, 2011, the Company retained a preferred equity interest in Merlin Media LLC with a par value of $28.7 million. The fair value of this preferred equity interest as of September 1, 2011, was approximately $10.8 million. As the preferred equity interest in Merlin Media LLC is non-redeemable and does not have a readily determinable fair value, as defined by accounting standards, this investment is accounted for under the cost method. Emmis determined that the investment in the preferred equity of Merlin Media LLC was impaired at February 29, 2012 and the impairment was other-than-temporary. As such, Emmis recognized an impairment loss of $10.8 million recorded in other income (expense), net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related to its preferred equity investment. The impairment loss reduced the carrying value of the investment in Merlin Media LLC preferred equity to zero as of February 29, 2012. See Note 8 for more discussion of the sale of a controlling interest in Merlin Media LLC and Note 16 for detail of other income (expense), net.

n. Deferred Revenue and Barter Transactions

Deferred revenue includes deferred magazine subscription revenue, deferred barter and other transactions in which payments are received prior to the performance of services (i.e. cash-in-advance advertising and prepaid LMA payments). Magazine subscription revenue is recognized when the publication is shipped. Barter transactions are recorded at the estimated fair value of the product or service received. Broadcast revenue from barter transactions is recognized when commercials are broadcast or a publication is delivered. The appropriate expense or asset is recognized when merchandise or services are used

Table of Contents

or received. Barter revenues for the years ended February 2012, 2013 and 2014 were $12.5 million, $9.2 million and $8.5 million, respectively, and barter expenses were $12.4 million, $9.2 million, and $8.7 million, respectively.

o. Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currencies of our international radio entities, all of which have now been sold or have ceased operations, are shown in the following table. The balance sheets of these entities were translated from their functional currencies to the U.S. dollar using the current exchange rate in effect at the subsidiaries’ balance sheet date (December 31 for our international radio entities). The results of operations for our international radio entities were translated using an average exchange rate for the period. The net translation adjustments reflected in shareholders’ (deficit) equity during the respective periods were as follows:



	Functional	For the Years Ended February 28 (29),
	Currency	2012			2013			2014
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Slovakia	Euro	$	(353	)	$	23		$	(11	)
Bulgaria	Leva	256			(175		)	—
Hungary	Forint	—			—			—
Reclassification due to substantial liquidation
Slovakia	Euro	$	—		$	3,324		$	—
Bulgaria	Leva	—			(1,971		)	—
Hungary	Forint	—			—			—
		$	(97	)	$	1,201		$	(11	)

p. Earnings Per Share

ASC Topic 260 requires dual presentation of basic and diluted income (loss) per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement for all entities with complex capital structures. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted. Potentially dilutive securities at February 2012, 2013 and 2014 consisted of stock options, restricted stock awards and preferred stock.

The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share from continuing operations:



	For the year ended
	February 29, 2012						February 28, 2013							February 28, 2014
	Net Income			Shares	Net Income Per Share		Net Loss			Shares	Net Loss Per Share			Net Income			Shares	Net Income Per Share
	(amounts in 000’s, except per share data)
Basic net income (loss) per common share:
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders from continuing operations	$	84,443		38,293	$	2.21	$	(8,114	)	39,034	$	(0.21	)	$	43,806		40,506	$	1.08
Impact of equity awards	—			967			—			—				—			3,264
Impact of conversion of preferred stock into common stock	(53,301		)	5,693			—			—				(325		)	2,272
Diluted net income (loss) per common share:
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders from continuing operations	$	31,142		44,953	$	0.69	$	(8,114	)	39,034	$	(0.21	)	$	43,481		46,042	$	0.94

Table of Contents

Shares excluded from the calculation as the effect of their conversion into shares of our common stock would be antidilutive were as follows:



	For the year ended February 28 (29),
	2012	2013	2014
	(shares in 000’s )
Preferred stock	—	2,288	—
Stock options and restricted stock awards	6,651	6,953	1,995
Antidilutive common share equivalents	6,651	9,241	1,995

q. Income Taxes

r. Long-Lived Tangible Assets

The Company periodically considers whether indicators of impairment of long-lived tangible assets are present. If such indicators are present, the Company determines whether the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows attributable to the assets in question are less than their carrying value. If less, the Company recognizes an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount of the assets over their respective fair values. Fair value is determined by discounted future cash flows, appraisals and other methods. If the assets determined to be impaired are to be held and used, the Company recognizes an impairment charge to the extent the asset’s carrying value is greater than the fair value. The fair value of the asset then becomes the asset’s new carrying value, which, if applicable, the Company depreciates or amortizes over the remaining estimated useful life of the asset.

s. Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in the financial statements and in disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

t. National Representation Agreement

On October 1, 2007, Emmis terminated its existing national sales representation agreement with Interep National Radio Sales, Inc. (“Interep”) and entered into a new agreement with Katz Communications, Inc. (“Katz”) extending through March 2018. Emmis’ existing contract with Interep extended through September 2011. Emmis, Interep and Katz entered into a tri-party termination and mutual release agreement under which Interep agreed to release Emmis from its future contractual obligations in exchange for a one-time payment of $15.3 million, which was paid by Katz on behalf of Emmis as an inducement for Emmis to enter into the new long-term contract with Katz. Emmis measured and recognized the charge associated with terminating the Interep contract as of the effective termination date, which was recorded as a noncash contract termination fee in the year ended February 2008. The liability established as a result of the termination represents an incentive received from Katz that is being recognized as a reduction of our national agency commission expense over the term of the agreement with Katz. The current portion of this liability is included in other current liabilities and the long-term portion of this liability is included in other noncurrent liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at February 28, 2013 and 2014.

u. Liquidity

The Company continually projects its anticipated cash needs, which include its operating needs, capital needs, principal and interest payments on its indebtedness and preferred stock dividends. As of the filing of this Form 10-K, management believes the Company can meet its liquidity needs through the end of fiscal year 2015 with cash and cash equivalents on hand, projected cash flows from operations, and, to the extent necessary, through its borrowing capacity under the 2012 Credit

Table of Contents

Agreement, which was $20.0 million at February 28, 2014. Based on these projections, management also believes the Company will be in compliance with its debt covenants through the end of fiscal year 2015.

v. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the accounting guidance was modified with respect to how to report the effect of a significant reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income. This guidance was effective for the Company as of March 1, 2013 and was applied prospectively. The adoption of this guidance did not materially change the presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2013, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that will require the presentation of certain unrecognized tax benefits as reductions to deferred tax assets rather than as liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The new standard requires adoption on a prospective basis for the Company as of March 1, 2014. The Company does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

w. Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years’ financial statements to be consistent with the February 28, 2014 presentation. The reclassifications have no impact on net income previously reported.

2. COMMON STOCK

Emmis has authorized Class A common stock, Class B common stock, and Class C common stock. The rights of these three classes are essentially identical except that each share of Class A common stock has one vote with respect to substantially all matters, each share of Class B common stock has 10 votes with respect to substantially all matters, and each share of Class C common stock has no voting rights with respect to substantially all matters. Class B common stock is owned by our Chairman, CEO and President, Jeffrey H. Smulyan. All shares of Class B common stock convert to Class A common stock upon sale or other transfer to a party unaffiliated with Mr. Smulyan. At February 28, 2013 and 2014, no shares of Class C common stock were issued or outstanding.

3. REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK

Each share of redeemable Preferred Stock is convertible into a number of shares of common stock, which is determined by dividing the liquidation preference of the share of preferred stock ($50.00 per share) by the conversion price. The conversion price is $20.495, which results in a conversion ratio of approximately 2.44 shares of common stock per share of Preferred Stock. Emmis may redeem the Preferred Stock for cash at 100% of the liquidation preference per share, which totaled $46.5 million as of February 28, 2014. Emmis’ 2012 Credit Agreement sets forth certain restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.

On September 3, 2012, the Company's shareholders approved amendments to the Company's Articles of Incorporation that, among other things, canceled Preferred Stock undeclared dividends and changed the designation of Preferred Stock from cumulative to non-cumulative. On May 2, 2013, the Board of the Company approved a repurchase program for the Company’s Preferred Stock under which the Company may repurchase up to $0.5 million in aggregate purchase price of its Preferred Stock commencing May 9, 2013. During the year ended February 28, 2014, the Company purchased 8,650 shares of Preferred Stock at a weighted average price of $12.38 per share. We recorded a gain on extinguishment of preferred stock of $0.3 million, net of transaction fees and expenses, which was recorded as a decrease to accumulated deficit and included in the computation of net income available to common shareholders in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Subsequent to our purchases during the year ended February 28, 2014, we have 1,328,991 shares of Preferred Stock outstanding, which includes 400,000 shares held pursuant to the 2012 Retention Plan and Trust discussed below.

The Company may make further repurchases its Preferred Stock from time to time in amounts and at prices the management of the Company deems appropriate, based on its evaluation of market conditions and other considerations. The Company’s repurchases may be executed using a combination of open market purchases, privately negotiated agreements, written repurchase plans or other transactions. The repurchases will be funded from cash on hand or available borrowings. The Preferred Stock repurchase program may be modified, extended, suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice.

2012 Retention Plan & Trust

On April 2, 2012, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2012 Retention Plan at a special meeting of shareholders. The Company contributed 400,000 shares of its Preferred Stock to the Trust in connection with the approval of the 2012 Retention Plan. Awards granted under the 2012 Retention Plan entitle the participants to receive a distribution two

Table of Contents

years from the date of shareholder approval of the plan, provided the participant is still an employee and was an employee upon inception of the plan. Distributions may be in the form of Class A common stock if the Company elects to convert the Preferred Stock to common stock at the then-current conversion ratio prior to distribution. The initial Trustee of the plan is Jeffrey H. Smulyan, our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer.

As of the Trust’s inception and February 28, 2014, no shares of Preferred Stock have been allocated to individual employees, nor is any individual entitled to any minimum number of shares. As a result, the service inception date for these awards precedes the grant date, and the Company is accounting for the 2012 Retention Plan as a liability plan, using variable accounting. Prior to establishment of a grant date, the Company will estimate the fair value of the shares at each reporting period, and will recognize the compensation expense over a two-year period that began on April 2, 2012. Upon the second anniversary of the Trust’s inception, the Trust’s governance will allocate the shares to individual employees, at which point fully vested shares will be distributed to employees. See Note 18, Subsequent Events, for a discussion of the distribution of vested shares to employees subsequent to February 28, 2014. The Trust is consolidated by the Company and both the assets and deferred compensation obligation of the Trust are accounted for within the applicable preferred stock classification in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company recognized approximately $0.7 million and $2.2 million of compensation expense related to the 2012 Retention Plan during the years ended February 28, 2013 and 2014, respectively.

In connection with the approval of the 2012 Retention Plan, the Trustee and the Trust entered into a Voting and Transfer Restriction Agreement with Emmis, pursuant to which Emmis has the right to direct the vote of the 400,000 shares of Preferred Stock contributed to the Trust under the 2012 Retention Plan. The Company also has the right to exchange the 400,000 shares of Preferred Stock into shares of Class A common stock at the same ratio as the conversion formula in the Preferred Stock (currently approximately 2.44 shares of Class A common stock for each share of Preferred Stock).

Total Return Swaps and Voting Agreements

On various dates in November 2011 and January 2012, Emmis either purchased or purchased rights in 1,871,529 shares of Preferred Stock at a weighted average price of $15.64 per share. We purchased 386,850 shares for cash and these shares were retired. The purchase price for the rights in the remaining shares was also paid in cash, but these shares were subject to total return swap arrangements. Pursuant to those agreements and arrangements, we had the ability to direct the vote of 1,484,679 shares of Preferred Stock, or approximately 61% of the Preferred Stock outstanding as of February 29, 2012. While the shares of Preferred Stock subject to total return swap and voting agreements were not retired for record purposes, they were considered extinguished for accounting purposes. Accordingly, during the year ended February 29, 2012, we recorded a gain on extinguishment of preferred stock of $61.9 million, net of transaction fees and expenses, which was recorded as a decrease to accumulated deficit and included in the computation of net income available to common shareholders in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

In order to comply with the terms of its 2006 Credit Agreement, Emmis exercised its early termination option under the total return swap transactions that it had entered into with certain holders of 1,484,679 shares of its Preferred Stock. The termination was effective on September 19, 2012. As a result, these 1,484,679 shares of Preferred Stock have returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares.

4. SHARE BASED PAYMENTS

The amounts recorded as share based compensation expense consist of stock option and restricted stock grants, common stock issued to employees and directors in lieu of cash payments, and Preferred Stock contributed to the 2012 Retention Plan.

Stock Option Awards

The Company has granted options to purchase its common stock to employees and directors of the Company under various stock option plans at no less than the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant. These options are granted for a term not exceeding 10 years and are forfeited, except in certain circumstances, in the event the employee or director terminates his or her employment or relationship with the Company. Generally, these options either vest annually over 3 years (one-third each year for 3 years), or cliff vest at the end of 3 years. The Company issues new shares upon the exercise of stock options.

Table of Contents

The fair value of each option awarded is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within the valuation model. The Company includes estimated forfeitures in its compensation cost and updates the estimated forfeiture rate through the final vesting date of awards. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The following assumptions were used to calculate the fair value of the Company’s options on the date of grant during the years ended February 28 (29), 2012, 2013 and 2014:



	For the Years Ended February 28 (29),
	2012	2013	2014
Risk-Free Interest Rate:	1.2% - 2.5%	0.5% - 0.7%	0.6% - 1.5%
Expected Dividend Yield:	0%	0%	0%
Expected Life (Years):	6.0	4.2	4.3
Expected Volatility:	110.2% - 111.3%	128.9% – 131.4%	80.4% - 115.9%

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s stock options outstanding at February 28, 2014, and stock option activity during the year ended February 28, 2014 (“Price” reflects the weighted average exercise price per share):



	Options	Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding, beginning of period	7,132,459	$	4.31
Granted	886,219	2.44
Exercised (1)	434,500	0.77
Forfeited	32,500	0.70
Expired	567,073	11.09
Outstanding, end of period	6,984,605	3.74		6.2	$	11,610
Exercisable, end of period	3,659,124	5.96		4.2	$	5,481


(1)	The Company did not record an income tax benefit related to option exercises in the year ended February 28 (29), 2012, 2013 and 2014. Cash received from option exercises during the years ended February 2012, 2013 and 2014 was less than $0.1 million, $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended February 28, 2013 and 2014, was $0.77 and $1.67, respectively.

A summary of the Company’s nonvested options at February 28, 2014, and changes during the year ended February 28, 2014, is presented below:



	Options	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested, beginning of period	3,188,104	$	0.76
Granted	886,219	1.67
Vested	716,342	0.85
Forfeited	32,500	0.57
Nonvested, end of period	3,325,481	0.98

There were 3.0 million shares available for future grants under the Company’s various equity plans at February 28, 2014. The vesting dates of outstanding options at February 28, 2014 range from March 2014 to July 2017, and expiration dates range from March 2014 to January 2024.

Table of Contents

Restricted Stock Awards

The Company grants restricted stock awards to directors annually, and periodically grants restricted stock to employees in connection with employment agreements. Awards to directors are granted on the date of our annual meeting of shareholders and vest on the earlier of (i) the completion of the director’s 3-year term or (ii) the third anniversary of the date of grant. Restricted stock award grants are granted out of the Company’s 2012 Equity Compensation Plan. The Company may also award, out of the Company’s 2012 Equity Compensation Plan, stock to settle certain bonuses and other compensation that otherwise would be paid in cash. Any restrictions on these shares may be immediately lapsed on the grant date.

On January 16, 2013, the Company commenced an option exchange program whereby optionees holding certain fully-vested underwater stock options were given the opportunity to exchange those stock options into restricted stock with a one-year vesting term. The exchange ratios were intended to result in little to no incremental accounting cost to the Company because the fair value of the options was measured immediately prior to the exchange and compared to the fair value of the restricted stock exchanged. The exchange offer closed February 15, 2013. Pursuant to the exchange offer and based on participant elections, approximately 2.2 million stock options were canceled and approximately 0.5 million shares of restricted stock were issued. These shares of restricted stock vested February 19, 2014. The exchange resulted in less than $0.1 million of incremental accounting cost during the years ended February 28, 2013 and 2014.

The following table presents a summary of the Company’s restricted stock grants outstanding at February 28, 2014, and restricted stock activity during the year ended February 28, 2014 (“Price” reflects the weighted average share price at the date of grant):



	Awards	Price
Grants outstanding, beginning of period	537,405	$	1.72
Granted	1,153,080	2.04
Vested (restriction lapsed)	1,097,832	2.02
Forfeited	2,109	1.73
Grants outstanding, end of period	590,544	1.79

The total grant date fair value of shares vested during the year ended February 28 (29), 2012, 2013 and 2014, was $1.0 million, $1.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively.

Recognized Non-Cash Compensation Expense

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense and related tax benefits recognized by the Company in the years ended February 28 (29), 2012, 2013 and 2014:



	Year Ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		2014
Station operating expenses	$	146	$	852	$	2,236
Corporate expenses	946		2,090		2,648
Stock-based compensation expense included in operating expenses	1,092		2,942		4,884
Tax benefit	—		—		1,954
Recognized stock-based compensation expense, net of tax	$	1,092	$	2,942	$	2,930

As of February 28, 2014, there was $2.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years.

Table of Contents

5. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt was comprised of the following at February 28, 2013 and 2014:



	As of February 28, 2013			As of February 28, 2014
2012 Credit Agreement debt :
Revolver	$	5,000		$	—
Term Loan	62,000			54,000
Total 2012 Credit Agreement debt	67,000			54,000
98.7FM nonrecourse debt	79,068			74,942
Current maturities	(12,126		)	(12,541		)
Unamortized original issue discount	(2,448		)	(1,475		)
Total long-term debt	$	131,494		$	114,926

2012 Credit Agreement Debt and Related Amendment

On December 28, 2012, Emmis Operating Company (“EOC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emmis, entered into a credit facility (the “2012 Credit Agreement”) to provide for total borrowings of up to $100.0 million, including (i) an $80 million term loan and (ii) a $20.0 million revolver, of which $5.0 million may be used for letters of credit.

A portion of the proceeds under the 2012 Credit Agreement were used to repay (i) EOC’s indebtedness under and terminate the 2006 Credit Agreement, for which Bank of America, N.A. acted as administrative agent and (ii) the Notes issued under the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of November 11, 2011 between Emmis Communications Corporation, as Issuer, and Zell Credit Opportunities Master Fund, L.P., as Purchaser, as amended, (“Senior Unsecured Notes”).

The term loan and revolver both mature on December 28, 2017. Beginning on April 1, 2013, the borrowings under the term loan are payable in quarterly installments equal to 2.50% of the original balance of the term loan, with the remaining balance payable December 28, 2017. Proceeds from raising additional equity, issuing additional subordinated debt or from asset sales, as well as excess cash flow, subject to certain exceptions, are required to be used to repay amounts outstanding under the 2012 Credit Agreement.

Approximately $0.5 million of transaction fees related to the 2012 Credit Agreement were capitalized and are being amortized over the life of the 2012 Credit Agreement. These deferred debt costs are included in other assets, net in the consolidated balance sheets. The 2012 Credit Agreement is carried on our consolidated balance sheets net of an original issue discount. The original issue discount, which was $2.5 million as of the issuance of the debt on December 28, 2012 and $1.5 million as of February 28, 2014, is being amortized as additional interest expense over the life of the 2012 Credit Agreement.

Borrowing under the 2012 Credit Agreement depends upon our continued compliance with certain operating covenants and financial ratios, including leverage and fixed charge coverage as specifically defined. The operating covenants and other restrictions with which we must comply include, among others, restrictions on additional indebtedness, incurrence of liens, engaging in businesses other than our primary business, paying certain dividends, redeeming or repurchasing capital stock of Emmis, acquisitions and asset sales. No default or event of default has occurred or is continuing. The 2012 Credit Agreement provides that an event of default will occur if there is a “change in control” of Emmis, as defined. The payment of principal, premium and interest under the 2012 Credit Agreement is fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by ECC and most of its existing wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. Substantially all of Emmis’ assets, including the stock of most of Emmis’ wholly-owned, domestic subsidiaries are pledged to secure the 2012 Credit Agreement.

Table of Contents

On August 9, 2013, Emmis entered into the First Amendment to Credit Agreement, Security Agreement and Subsidiary Guarantee (“First Amendment”) which allowed for the formation of NextRadio LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Emmis, as an excluded subsidiary under the Credit Agreement and facilitated the transactions contemplated by the agreement with Sprint dated August 9, 2013 (see Note 9). No financial covenants were impacted by the First Amendment and total costs were less than $0.1 million.

During the year ended February 28, 2014, Emmis recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $0.7 million. Approximately $0.1 million of the loss related to the write-off of deferred debt fees and approximately $0.6 million related to the write-off of unamortized debt discount associated with the Company's early repayments of term loans.

We were in compliance with all financial and non-financial covenants as of February 28, 2014. Our Senior Leverage Ratio, Total Leverage Ratio and Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (each as defined in the 2012 Credit Agreement) requirements and actual amounts as of February 28, 2014 were as follows:



	As of February 28, 2014
	Covenant Requirement	Actual Results
Maximum Senior Leverage Ratio	3.25 : 1.00	2.51 : 1.00
Maximum Total Leverage Ratio	4.00 : 1.00	2.51 : 1.00
Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio	1.25 : 1.00	1.58 : 1.00

98.7FM Nonrecourse Debt

On May 30, 2012, the Company, through wholly-owned, newly-created subsidiaries, issued $82.2 million of nonrecourse notes. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, through a participation agreement with Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, National Association, is entitled to receive payments made on the notes. The notes are obligations only of the newly-created subsidiaries, are non-recourse to the rest of the Company’s subsidiaries and are secured by the assets of the newly-created subsidiaries, including the payments made to the newly-created subsidiary related to the 98.7FM LMA, which are guaranteed by Disney Enterprises, Inc. The notes bear interest at 4.1%.

Based on amounts outstanding at February 28, 2014, mandatory principal payments of long-term debt for the next five years and thereafter are summarized below:



	2012 Credit Agreement
Year Ended	Revolver		Term Loan		98.7FM Debt		Total
February 28 (29),	Amortization		Amortization		Amortization		Amortization
2015	$	—	$	8,000	$	4,541	$	12,541
2016	—		8,000		4,990		12,990
2017	—		8,000		5,453		13,453
2018	—		30,000		6,039		36,039
2019	—		—		6,587		6,587
Thereafter	—		—		47,332		47,332
Total	$	—	$	54,000	$	74,942	$	128,942

6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives

The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate exposure with the following objectives:


•	manage current and forecasted interest rate risk while maintaining optimal financial flexibility and solvency

Table of Contents


•	proactively manage the Company’s cost of capital to ensure the Company can effectively manage operations and execute its business strategy, thereby maintaining a competitive advantage and enhancing shareholder value


•	comply with covenant requirements in the Company’s credit facility

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk

The Company utilizes interest rate derivatives to add stability to cash payments for interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Under the terms of its 2012 Credit Agreement, the Company is required to fix or cap the interest rate on at least 50% of its Term Loan exposure for a two-year period ending December 28, 2014. The requirement to fix or cap interest rates can be reduced to a one-year period provided the Company’s Senior Leverage Ratio (as defined in the 2012 Credit Agreement) is at or under 2.50:1.00 as of May 31, 2014.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The Company’s interest rate derivatives are used to hedge the interest payment cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. The Company did not record any hedge ineffectiveness in earnings during the three years ended February 28, 2014. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivatives are reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. During fiscal 2015, the Company estimates that approximately $0.1 million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.

The Company does not generally use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instrument as well as its classification on the balance sheet as of February 28, 2013 and 2014. The accumulated other comprehensive loss balance related to our derivative instrument at February 28, 2014 was approximately $0.1 million. The fair value of the derivative instrument was estimated by obtaining quotations from the financial institution that was the counterparty to the instrument. The fair value was an estimate of the net amount that the Company would have been required to pay on February 28, 2014, if the agreement was transferred to another party or canceled by the Company, as further adjusted by a credit adjustment required by ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, as discussed below. For the years ended February 2012, 2013 and 2014, this credit adjustment was immaterial.



	Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments Liability Derivatives
	As of February 28, 2013			As of February 28, 2014
	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest Rate Swap Agreement	Other Noncurrent Liabilities	107		Other Current Liabilities	94
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		$	107		$	94

Table of Contents

The table below presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended February 2012, 2013 and 2014.



			For the Years Ended February 28 (29),
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)								Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)								Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)	Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	2012		2013			2014				2012			2013		2014				2012		2013		2014
Interest Rate Swap Agreement	$	—	$	(107	)	$	(83	)	Interest expense	$	(297	)	$	—	$	(96	)	N/A	$	—	$	—	$	—
Total	$	—	$	(107	)	$	(83	)		$	(297	)	$	—	$	(96	)		$	—	$	—	$	—

Credit-risk-related Contingent Features

The Company manages its counterparty risk by entering into derivative instruments with financial institutions where it believes the risk of credit loss resulting from nonperformance by the counterparty is low. As discussed above, the Company’s counterparty to its interest rate swap is Fifth Third Bank.

In accordance with ASC Topic 820, the Company makes a Credit Value Adjustment (CVA) to adjust the valuation of a derivative to account for our own credit risk with respect to all derivative liability positions. The CVA is accounted for as a decrease to the derivative position with the corresponding increase or decrease reflected in other comprehensive income (loss) for derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. The CVA also accounts for nonperformance risk of our counterparties in the fair value measurement of all derivative asset positions, when appropriate. As of February 28, 2014, this CVA was immaterial to the fair value of our derivative instrument.

The Company’s interest rate swap agreement with Fifth Third Bank incorporates the loan covenant provisions of the Company’s 2012 Credit Agreement. Fifth Third Bank is a lender under the Company’s 2012 Credit Agreement. Failure to comply with the loan covenant provisions of the 2012 Credit Agreement could result in the Company being in default of its obligations under the interest rate swap agreement.

As of February 28, 2014, the Company has not posted any collateral related to the interest rate swap agreement.

7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

As defined in ASC Topic 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of February 28, 2013 and 2014. The financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

Table of Contents



	As of February 28, 2014
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs		Total
Available for sale securities	$	—	$	—	$	6,750	$	6,750
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis	$	—	$	—	$	6,750	$	6,750
Share-based compensation arrangement	$	2,926	$	—	$	—	$	2,926
Interest rate swap agreement	—		94		—		94
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis	$	2,926	$	94	$	—	$	3,020

	As of February 28, 2013
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs		Total
Available for sale securities	$	—	$	—	$	6,500	$	6,500
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis	$	—	$	—	$	6,500	$	6,500
Share-based compensation arrangement	$	714	$	—	$	—	$	714
Interest rate swap agreement	—		107		—		107
Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis	$	714	$	107	$	—	$	821

Available for sale securities — Emmis’ available for sale securities are investments in preferred stock of private companies that are not traded in active markets. The investments are recorded at fair value, which is generally estimated using significant unobservable market parameters, resulting in a level 3 categorization. The carrying value of our preferred stock investments is determined by using implied valuations of recent rounds of financing and by other corroborating evidence, including the application of various valuation methodologies including option-pricing and discounted cash flow based models.

Share-based compensation arrangement — Emmis’ 2012 Retention Plan and Trust discussed in Note 3 is recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. As the fair value of the 2012 Retention Plant and Trust is tied to quoted prices of Emmis stock, it is considered a level 1 measurement. As of February 28, 2013 and 2014, our share-based compensation arrangement liability is included in our consolidated balance sheets as other noncurrent liabilities and share-based compensation arrangement, a current liability, respectively.

Interest rate swap agreement — Emmis’ derivative financial instruments consisted solely of an interest rate cash flow hedge in which the Company pays a fixed rate and receives a variable interest rate that was observable based upon a forward interest rate curve and is therefore considered a level 2 measurement.

The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs:



	Year Ended February 28,
	2013			2014
	Available For Sale Securities
Beginning Balance	$	160		$	6,500
Purchases	6,500			250
Other than temporary impairment losses	(160		)	—
Ending Balance	$	6,500		$	6,750

Table of Contents

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

The Company has certain assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis under circumstances and events that include those described in Note 10, Intangible Assets and Goodwill, and are adjusted to fair value only when the carrying values are more than the fair values. The categorization of the framework used to price the assets is considered a Level 3 measurement due to the subjective nature of the unobservable inputs used to determine the fair value (see Note 10 for more discussion).

Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments

The estimated fair value of financial instruments is determined using the best available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary, however, in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange, or the value that ultimately will be realized upon maturity or disposition. The use of different market assumptions may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments:

- Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, including accrued liabilities: The carrying amount of these assets and liabilities approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

- Long-term debt: The Company’s long-term debt is not actively traded and is considered a level 3 measurement. The Company believes the current carrying value of its long-term debt approximates its fair value.

8. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS

For the year ended February 28, 2014

On February 11, 2014, Emmis entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with YMF Media LLC ("YMF"), pursuant to which Emmis agreed to purchase the assets of radio stations WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM in New York, NY ("Stations") for $131 million, subject to customary adjustments and prorations. Following approval by the Federal Communications Commission and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions, the transaction is scheduled to close in two separate closings. The first closing is expected to occur promptly after receipt of the FCC’s consent to the assignment to Emmis of the Stations’ FCC licenses, and will involve YMF transferring WBLS-FM's and WLIB-AM's assets to Emmis and Emmis (i) transferring the Stations’ assets to newly-formed subsidiaries of Emmis, (ii) paying YMF $55 million of the purchase price and (iii) transferring to YMF a 49.9% noncontrolling ownership interest in the Emmis subsidiaries that will own the Stations’ assets. The second closing is scheduled to occur on or about February 15, 2015, and will involve the payment of the balance of the purchase price to YMF ($76 million) in exchange for the transfer to Emmis of YMF’s interest in the Emmis subsidiaries that own the Stations’ assets. The Purchase and Sale Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities, including liquidated damages in the amount of ten percent of the purchase price and specific performance remedies that may be asserted by either Emmis or YMF.

On February 11, 2014, Emmis entered into an LMA with YMF to program the Stations. The LMA did not commence until March 1, 2014, thus the operating results of the Stations are not included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. See Note 1e for more discussion of the LMA.

For the year ended February 28, 2013

Sale of Slovakia radio operations

Sale of Bulgarian radio operations

Table of Contents

which is included in income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The loss on disposal primarily resulted from the reclassification of accumulated currency translation adjustments.

Sale of Emmis Interactive Inc.

On October 31, 2012, Emmis completed the sale of Emmis Interactive Inc., a subsidiary of Emmis that provided a content management system, data analytic tools and related services, to Marketron Broadcast Solutions, LLC (“Marketron”) for no net proceeds. The sale of Emmis Interactive Inc. allowed Emmis to mitigate expected future operating losses. Marketron had assumed operating control of Emmis Interactive, Inc., on October 4, 2012. In connection with the sale, Emmis recorded a loss on sale of assets of approximately $0.7 million, which is primarily related to severance for former employees and is included in income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Sale of Sampler Publications

Sale of KXOS-FM

On August 23, 2012, Emmis completed the sale of KXOS-FM in Los Angeles for $85.5 million in cash. In connection with the sale, Emmis recorded a gain on sale of assets of approximately $32.8 million, which is included in income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. KXOS-FM had previously been operating pursuant to a local programming and marketing agreement, which is discussed in more detail in Note 1e to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

For the year ended February 29, 2012

Sale of controlling interest in WRXP-FM, WKQX-FM AND WLUP-FM

On September 1, 2011, the Company completed the sale of a controlling interest in Merlin Media, LLC (“Merlin Media”), which owned the following radio stations: (i) WKQX-FM, 101.1MHz, Channel 266, Chicago, IL (FIN 19525), (ii) WRXP-FM, 101.9MHz, Channel 270, New York, NY (FIN 67846) and (iii) WLUP-FM, 97.9MHz, Channel 250, Chicago, IL (FIN 73233) (collectively the “Merlin Stations”). The Company received gross cash sale proceeds of $130 million in the transaction, and incurred approximately $8.6 million of expenses, principally consisting of severance, state and local taxes, and professional and other fees and expenses. The Company used the net cash proceeds to repay approximately 38% of the term loans then outstanding under its 2006 Credit Agreement. Emmis also paid a $2.0 million exit fee to a lender related to the repayment of certain term loans on September 1, 2011.

Table of Contents

Merlin Media changed the format of WKQX-FM in Chicago and WRXP-FM in New York from a music-intensive format to a news/talk format. Both stations incurred substantial start-up losses well in excess of the original business model used in the September 1, 2011 valuation. Both stations underperformed through February 29, 2012, so much so that station cash flows were expected to be substantially lower than the estimated cash flows used in the September 1, 2011 valuation of our retained common and preferred equity interests. As such, Emmis reassessed the fair value of the retained common and preferred equity interests using the same valuation methodology described above with updated assumptions, and determined that our equity interests were fully impaired. The Company believes that the magnitude of the impairment and the potentially prolonged recovery period indicate that the impairment is other-than-temporary. As such, Emmis wrote-off the remaining carrying value of its investments in Merlin Media LLC. The total equity method loss and other-than-temporary impairment loss recognized related to Merlin Media LLC of $16.4 million is recognized in other income (expense), net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. During the year ended February 28, 2013, Merlin Media sold WRXP-FM in New York to a third party and changed the format of WKQX-FM in Chicago to a music-intensive format. During the year ended February 28, 2014, Merlin Media entered into an LMA with Cumulus Media Inc. pursuant to which Merlin Media will receive a monthly fee and Cumulus will program and manage Merlin Media's two radio stations in Chicago, which are Merlin Media's sole remaining stations. Cumulus Media Inc. retains all of the operating profits for managing the stations. Merlin Media and Cumulus Media Inc. also entered into a call option which gives Cumulus Media Inc. the right to purchase the two stations until October 4, 2017 and gives Merlin Media the right to require Cumulus Media Inc. to purchase the two stations during a ten-day period commencing on October 4, 2017.

Under the LLC Agreement, the Company is entitled initially to appoint one out of five members of Merlin Media’s board of managers and has limited consent rights with respect to specified transactions. The Company has no obligation to make ongoing capital contributions to Merlin Media, but as noted above is subject to dilution if it fails to participate pro rata in future capital calls. As of February 28, 2013, due to our nonparticipation in capital contributions to Merlin Media, our common equity ownership interest is approximately 17.5%.

Sale of Glendale, CA Tower Site

Table of Contents

9. OTHER SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS

Next Radio LLC - Sprint Agreement

On August 9, 2013, NextRadio LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Emmis, entered into an agreement with Sprint whereby Sprint agreed to pre-load theCompany's smartphone application, NextRadio, in a minimum of 30 million FM-enabled wireless devices on the Sprint wireless network over a three-year period. In return, NextRadio LLC agreed to pay Sprint $15 million per year in equal quarterly installments over the three year term and to share with Sprint certain revenue generated by the NextRadio app. Emmis has not guaranteed NextRadio LLC's performance under this agreement and Sprint does not have recourse to any Emmis related entity other than NextRadio LLC. Additionally, the agreement does not limit the ability of NextRadio LLC to place the NextRadio app on FM-enabled devices on other wireless networks. Through February 28, 2014, the NextRadio app had not generated a material amount of revenue.

Nearly all of the largest radio broadcasters and many smaller radio broadcasters have expressed support for NextRadio LLC's agreement with Sprint. Accordingly, NextRadio LLC has entered into a number of funding agreements with radio broadcasters and other participants in the radio industry to collect and remit cash to Sprint to fulfill the quarterly payment

obligation. As part of some of these funding agreements, Emmis agreed to certain limitations on the operation of its NextRadio and TagStation businesses, including assurances of access to the NextRadio app and to TagStation (the cloud-based engine that provides data to the NextRadio app), and limitations on sale of the businesses to potential competitors of the U.S. radio industry. Emmis also granted the U.S. radio industry (as defined in the funding agreements) a call option on substantially all of the assets used in the NextRadio and TagStation businesses in the United States. The call option may be exercised in August 2017 or August 2019 by paying Emmis a purchase price equal to the greater of (i) the appraised fair market value of the NextRadio and TagStation businesses, or (ii) two times Emmis' cumulative investments in the development of the businesses. If the call option is exercised, the businesses will continue to be subject to the operating limitations applicable today, and no radio operator will be permitted to own more than 30% of the NextRadio and TagStation businesses.

Emmis determined that NextRadio LLC is a variable interest entity (VIE) and that Emmis is the primary beneficiary because the Company has the power to direct substantially all of the activities of NextRadio LLC, and because the Company may absorb certain losses and receive certain benefits from the operations of the VIE. Emmis does not record any revenue or expense related to the amounts that are collected and remitted to Sprint except the portion of any payment to Sprint that was actually contributed to NextRadio LLC by Emmis, which is recorded as station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense. NextRadio LLC made the first $3.75 million quarterly payment to Sprint on August 9, 2013. Emmis paid $0.8 million of the first quarterly payment amount, which was expensed over the three-month period ending November 8, 2013. On various dates in December 2013 and January 2014, NextRadio LLC remitted the second $3.75 million quarterly payment to Sprint. Emmis paid $0.4 million of the second quarterly installment, which was expensed during the three-month period ending February 8, 2014. As of February 28, 2014, the carrying value of assets within NextRadio LLC totaled $0.8 million, which represents cash collected by NextRadio LLC from other broadcasting companies and other companies in the radio industry, which is considered restricted for the purpose of the third quarterly payment. NextRadio LLC had $0.8 million of liabilities at February 28, 2014, which represents the obligation to remit cash received from radio industry participants to Sprint. NextRadio LLC remitted the third quarterly payment to Sprint in March 2014, and Emmis paid $0.1 million of the third quarterly installment. Total expense recognized by Emmis during the year ended February 28, 2014 was $1.1 million.

LMA of 98.7FM in New York, NY and Related Financing Transaction

On April 26, 2012 Emmis entered into an LMA with a subsidiary of Disney Enterprises, Inc., pursuant to which the Disney subsidiary purchased the right to provide programming for 98.7FM in New York, NY until August 24, 2024. Emmis retains ownership and control of 98.7FM, including the related FCC license during the term of the LMA and receives an annual fee from from the Disney subsidiary. The fee, initially $8.4 million annually, increases by 3.5% annually until the LMA's termination.

As discussed in Note 5, Emmis, through newly-created subsidiaries, issued $82.2 million of notes, which are nonrecourse to the rest of the Company's subsidiaries and are secured by the assets of the newly-created subsidiaries including the payments made in connection with the 98.7FM LMA. See Notes 1e and 5 for more discussion of the LMA payments and nonrecourse debt.

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes certain operating results of 98.7FM for all periods presented. Emmis programmed 98.7FM until the LMA commenced on April 26, 2012. Results of operations for the period that Emmis programmed the station are included in the operating results presented below. 98.7FM is a part of our radio segment.



	For the year ended February 28 (29),
	2012		2013		2014
Net revenues	$	11,276	$	10,589	$	10,331
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense	10,279		4,410		1,009
Depreciation and amortization	125		112		—
Interest expense	—		2,689		3,416

Assets and liabilities of 98.7FM as of February 28, 2013 and 2014 were as follows:



	As of February 28,
	2013		2014
Current assets:
Restricted cash	$	1,426	$	1,407
Prepaid expenses	673		614
Total current assets	2,099		2,021
Noncurrent assets:
Indefinite lived intangibles	60,525		60,525
Deferred debt issuance costs, net	3,024		2,759
Deposits and other	1,432		3,082
Total noncurrent assets	64,981		66,366
Total assets	$	67,080	$	68,387
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	26	$	56
Current maturities of long-term debt	4,126		4,541
Deferred revenue	703		728
Other current liabilities	270		256
Total current liabilities	5,125		5,581
Noncurrent liabilities:
Long-term debt, net of current portion	74,942		70,401
Other noncurrent liabilities	—		24
Total noncurrent liabilities	74,942		70,425
Total liabilities	$	80,067	$	76,006

Sale of WRKS-FM Intellectual Property

On April 5, 2012, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with YMF in which the Company agreed to sell certain intellectual property rights, described below, to YMF, and YMF agreed to also assume certain liabilities of the Company. The purchase price was $10.0 million, plus quarterly earn-out payments, if any, equal to 15% of the incremental gross revenue over a three-year period in excess of calendar 2011 gross revenues attributable to radio station WBLS-FM, 107.5FM, New York, NY, which is owned by YMF. The assets sold to YMF included intellectual property rights used or held for use by the Company exclusively in the business or operation of 98.7FM (frequently known as WRKS-FM), and all assignable registrations, applications, renewals, issuances, extensions, restorations and reversions for, in respect of or relating to the intellectual property. The Asset Purchase Agreement contained customary representations, warranties, covenants and indemnities.

The sale of WRKS-FM’s intellectual property became effective on May 7, 2012. The $10.0 million gain was reflected in gain on sale of assets in the consolidated statements of operations. Emmis collected the $10.0 million intellectual property sale proceeds on July 6, 2012 and used the entire amount to repay term loans under the Company’s 2006 Credit Agreement.

Table of Contents

In connection with the agreement to purchase WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM from YMF as discussed in Note 8, Emmis and YMF agreed to modify the quarterly earn-out payments. Effective upon the first closing of the purchase of WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM, quarterly earn-out payments will be fixed at $0.5 million per quarter, retroactive to the first calendar quarter of 2014. Emmis will continue to collect earn-out payments until the second closing of the purchase of WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM, at which time all future earn-out payments in the three-year term are accelerated and settled at closing.

10. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

In accordance with ASC Topic 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other, the Company reviews goodwill and other intangibles at least annually for impairment. In connection with any such review, if the recorded value of goodwill and other intangibles is greater than its fair value, the intangibles are written down and charged to results of operations. FCC licenses are renewed every eight years at a nominal cost, and historically all of our FCC licenses have been renewed at the end of their respective eight-year periods. Since we expect that all of our FCC licenses will continue to be renewed in the future, we believe they have indefinite lives. Radio stations in a geographic market cluster are considered a single unit of accounting, provided that they are not being operated under a Local Marketing Agreement by another broadcaster.

Impairment testing

The Company generally performs its annual impairment review of indefinite-lived intangibles as of December 1 each year. At the time of each impairment review, if the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible is less than its carrying value a charge is recorded to results of operations. When indicators of impairment are present, the Company will perform an interim impairment test. In connection with the April 2012 LMA with a subsidiary of Disney Enterprises, Inc. discussed in Note 1e, the Company separated its two New York stations into separate units of accounting. In connection with the separation of the stations into separate units of accounting, the Company performed an interim impairment test of those licenses. Impairment recorded as a result of our interim and annual impairment testing is summarized in the table below. We will perform additional interim impairment assessments whenever triggering events suggest such testing for the recoverability of these assets is warranted.



	Interim Assessment			Annual Assessment
	FCC Licenses	Goodwill	Definite-lived	FCC Licenses		Goodwill		Definite-lived		Total
Year Ended February 29, 2012	N/A	N/A	N/A	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Year Ended February 28, 2013	10,971	—	—	—		448		—		11,419
Year Ended February 28, 2014	N/A	N/A	N/A	—		—		—		—

Valuation of Indefinite-lived Broadcasting Licenses

Fair value of our FCC licenses is estimated to be the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To determine the fair value of our FCC licenses, the Company uses an income valuation method when it performs its impairment tests. Under this method, the Company projects cash flows that would be generated by each of its units of accounting assuming the unit of accounting was commencing operations in its respective market at the beginning of the valuation period. This cash flow stream is discounted to arrive at a value for the FCC license. The Company assumes the competitive situation that exists in each market remains unchanged, with the exception that its unit of accounting commenced operations at the beginning of the valuation period. In doing so, the Company extracts the value of going concern and any other assets acquired, and strictly values the FCC license. Major assumptions involved in this analysis include market revenue, market revenue growth rates, unit of accounting audience share, unit of accounting revenue share and discount rate. Each of these assumptions may change in the future based upon changes in general economic conditions, audience behavior, consummated transactions, and numerous other variables that may be beyond our control. The projections incorporated into our license valuations take into consideration then current economic conditions.

Table of Contents

Assumptions incorporated into the annual impairment testing as of December 1, 2013 were similar to those used in our December 1, 2012 annual impairment testing. The methodology used to value our FCC licenses has not changed in the three-year period ended February 28, 2014.



	December 1, 2011	December 1, 2012	December 1, 2013
Discount Rate	11.9% - 12.2%	11.9% - 12.3%	12.0% - 12.4%
Long-term Revenue Growth Rate	2.5% - 3.3%	2.3% - 3.3%	2.3% - 3.1%
Mature Market Share	3.2% - 29.4%	3.2% - 29.4%	3.5% - 30.2%
Operating Profit Margin	26.0% - 37.2%	25.1% - 38.3%	25.0% - 39.1%

As of February 28, 2013 and 2014, the carrying amounts of the Company’s FCC licenses were $150.5 million and $150.6 million, respectively. These amounts are entirely attributable to our radio division. The table below presents the changes to the carrying values of the Company’s FCC licenses for the years ended February 2013 and 2014 for each unit of accounting.



	Change in FCC License Carrying Values
Unit of Accounting	As of February 29, 2012		Change in Unit of Accounting			Purchases		Impairment			Sale of KXOS-FM			As of February 28, 2013		Purchases		As of February 28, 2014
Continuing Operations
New York Cluster	$	74,093	$	(74,093	)	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—
WQHT-FM (New York)	—		2,597			—		—			—			2,597		—		2,597
98.7FM (New York)	—		71,496			—		(10,971		)	—			60,525		—		60,525
Austin Cluster	39,025		—			230		—			—			39,255		—		39,255
St. Louis Cluster	27,692		—			—		—			—			27,692		—		27,692
Indianapolis Cluster	17,274		—			380		—			—			17,654		—		17,654
KPWR-FM (Los Angeles)	2,018		—			—		—			—			2,018		—		2,018
Terre Haute Cluster	574		—			207		—			—			781		36		817
Total Continuing Operations	160,676		—			817		(10,971		)	—			150,522		36		150,558
Discontinued Operations
KXOS-FM (Los Angeles)	52,333		—			—		—			(52,333		)	—		—
Grand Total	$	213,009	$	—		$	817	$	(10,971	)	$	(52,333	)	$	150,522	$	36	$	150,558

Valuation of Goodwill

Table of Contents

licenses valued using a direct-method valuation approach) and unrecognized intangible assets, such as customer lists, with the residual amount representing the implied fair value of the goodwill. To the extent the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, the difference is recorded as an impairment charge in the statement of operations. The methodology used to value our goodwill has not changed in the three-year period ended February 28, 2014.

During our December 1, 2012 annual goodwill impairment test, the Company wrote off $0.4 million of goodwill associated with our Indianapolis Monthly publication. Declining operating performance of Indianapolis Monthly resulted in a step-one indication of impairment for Indianapolis Monthly on both the market and income approaches. Upon completing the step-two analysis, the Company determined that the full carrying amount of Indianapolis Monthly goodwill of $0.4 million was impaired. No goodwill impairment was recorded in connection with our annual test as of December 1, 2013.

As of February 28, 2013 and 2014, the carrying amount of the Company’s goodwill was $12.6 million. The table below presents the changes to the carrying values of the Company’s goodwill for the year ended February 2013 for each reporting unit. Goodwill carrying values did not change during the year ended February 28, 2014. As noted above, each reporting unit is a cluster of radio stations in one geographical market and magazines on an individual basis. We have previously written off all goodwill associated with our Austin cluster except for the portion of historical goodwill that exists at the Austin partnership level attributable to noncontrolling interests.



	Change in Goodwill Carrying Values
Reporting Unit	As of February 29, 2012		Impairment			Sale of Entity			As of February 28, 2013
Continuing Operations
Indianapolis Cluster	$	265	$	—		$	—		$	265
Austin Cluster	4,338		—			—			4,338
Total Radio Segment	4,603					—			4,603
Indianapolis Monthly	448		(448		)	—			—
Texas Monthly	8,036		—			—			8,036
Total Publishing Segment	8,484		(448		)	—			8,036
Total continuing operations	13,087		(448		)	—			12,639
Discontinued Operations
Slovakia	1,703		—			(1,703		)	—
Country Sampler	9,385		—			(9,385		)	—
Total discontinued operations	11,088		—			(11,088		)	—
Grand total	$	24,175	$	(448	)	$	(11,088	)	$	12,639

Definite-lived intangibles

The following table presents the weighted-average remaining useful life at February 28, 2014 and gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization for each major class of definite-lived intangible assets at February 28, 2013 and 2014:



		As of February 28, 2013						As of February 28, 2014
	Weighted Average Remaining Useful Life (in years)	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount
Trademarks	11.2	$	749	$	524	$	225	$	810	$	548	$	262

Total amortization expense from definite-lived intangibles related to continuing operations was less than $0.1 million for each of the years ended February 2012, 2013 and 2014 and is expected to be less than $0.1 million for each of the five succeeding years.

11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

a. Equity Incentive Plans

The Company has stock options and restricted stock grants outstanding that were issued to employees or non-employee directors under one or more of the following plans: 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2004 Equity

Table of Contents

Compensation Plan, the 2010 Equity Compensation Plan and the 2012 Equity Compensation Plan. These outstanding grants continue to be governed by the terms of the applicable plan.

2012 Equity Compensation Plan

At the 2012 annual meeting, the shareholders of Emmis approved the 2012 Equity Compensation Plan (“the Plan”). Under the Plan, awards equivalent to 2.0 million shares of common stock may be granted. Furthermore, any unissued awards from the 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (or shares subject to outstanding awards that would again become available for awards under this plan) increases the number of shares of common stock available for grant under the Plan. The awards, which have certain restrictions, may be for incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights or performance units. Under this Plan, all awards are granted with a purchase price equal to at least the fair market value of the stock except for shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units, which may be granted with any purchase price (including zero). The stock options under this Plan generally expire not more than 10 years from the date of grant. Under this Plan, awards equivalent to approximately 2.0 million shares of common stock were available for grant at February 28, 2014.

b. 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan

Emmis sponsors a Section 401(k) retirement savings plans that is available to substantially all employees age 18 years and older who have at least 30 days of service. Employees may make pretax contributions to the plans up to 50% of their compensation, not to exceed the annual limit prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). Emmis may make discretionary matching contributions to the plans in the form of cash or shares of the Company’s Class A common stock.

Employee contributions are matched at 33% up to a maximum of 6% of eligible compensation. Emmis’ discretionary contributions to the plan totaled $0.9 million for each the years ended February 2012, 2013 and 2014. All discretionary contributions were made in cash.

c. Defined Contribution Health and Retirement Plan

Emmis contributes to a multi-employer defined contribution health and retirement plan for employees who are members of a certain labor union. Amounts charged to expense for continuing operations related to the multi-employer plan were approximately $0.4 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the years ended February 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively.

12. OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

a. Commitments of our continuing operations

The Company has various commitments under the following types of material contracts for its continuing operations: (i) operating leases; (ii) radio syndicated programming; (iii) employment agreements and (iv) other contracts with annual commitments (mostly contractual services for audience measurement information) at February 28, 2014 as follows:



Year ending February 28 (29),	Operating Leases		Syndicated Programming		Employment Agreements		Other Contracts		Total
2015	$	7,921	$	615	$	12,376	$	2,588	$	23,500
2016	7,420		430		5,519		120		13,489
2017	7,342		235		1,442		123		9,142
2018	6,718		—		653		127		7,498
2019	5,997		—		—		43		6,040
Thereafter	23,147		—		—		—		23,147
Total	$	58,545	$	1,280	$	19,990	$	3,001	$	82,816

Emmis leases certain office space, tower space, equipment and automobiles under operating leases expiring at various dates through July 2027. Some of the lease agreements contain renewal options and annual rental escalation clauses (generally tied to the Consumer Price Index or increases in the lessor’s operating costs), as well as provisions for payment of utilities and maintenance costs. The Company recognizes escalated rents on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease agreement. Rental expense for continuing operations during the years ended February 2012, 2013 and 2014 was approximately $6.8 million, $7.5 million and $8.2 million, respectively. The Company recognized approximately $0.3 million, $0.9 million and $1.0 million of sublease income as a reduction of rent expense for the years ended February 2012, 2013, and 2014 respectively. Total minimum sublease rentals to be received in the future under noncancelable subleases as of February 28, 2014 were as follows:

Table of Contents



Year ending February 28 (29),	Noncancelable Sublease rentals¹
2015	$	1,262
2016	1,086
2017	1,092
2018	409
2019	—
Total	$	3,849

¹ Includes sublease rentals from YMF in New York City of $0.8 million in fiscal 2015, 2016 and 2017 and $0.2 million in fiscal 2018. These are expected to terminate upon consummation of our pending acquisition of WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM (See Note 8 for more discussion).

b. Litigation

On August 31, 2012, the U.S. District Court denied the plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs subsequently filed an amended complaint seeking monetary damages and dismissing all claims against the individual officer and director defendants. On February 28, 2014, the U.S. District Court issued a ruling in favor of Emmis on all counts. In March 2014, the Plaintiffs filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit an appeal of the U.S. District Court's decision. Emmis is defending this lawsuit vigorously.

13. INCOME TAXES

United States and foreign income (loss) before income taxes for the years ended February 2012, 2013 and 2014 was as follows:



	2012			2013			2014
United States	$	4,305		$	(7,518	)	$	16,659
Foreign	(867		)	(1,350		)	(2,067		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	3,438		$	(8,868	)	$	14,592

Table of Contents

The benefit for income taxes for the years ended February 2012, 2013, and 2014 consisted of the following:



	2012			2013			2014
Current:
Federal	$	529		$	(529	)	$	—
State	1,510			(152		)	(900		)
Foreign	—			161			13
	2,039			(520		)	(887		)
Deferred:
Federal	(29,303		)	(4,589		)	(25,219		)
State	(5,023		)	(1,930		)	(7,957		)
Foreign	—			—			—
	(34,326		)	(6,519		)	(33,176		)
Benefit for income taxes	$	(32,287	)	$	(7,039	)	$	(34,063	)
Other Tax Related Information:
Tax provision (benefit) of discontinued operations	5,544			(6,975		)	—

Table of Contents

The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended February 2012, 2013 and 2014 differs from that computed at the Federal statutory corporate tax rate as follows:



	2012			2013			2014
Computed income tax provision (benefit) at 35%	$	1,203		$	(3,109	)	$	5,110
State income tax benefit	(3,513		)	(2,082		)	(8,857		)
Foreign taxes	303			639			737
Tax benefit resulting from swap expiration and related OCI reversal	(786		)	—			—
Allocation of tax benefit from discontinued operations	—			(3,007		)	—
Nondeductible stock compensation and Section 162 disallowance	271			127			55
Entertainment disallowance	504			430			455
Change in valuation allowance	(30,092		)	6,966			(31,059		)
Tax attributed to noncontrolling interest	(1,496		)	(1,561		)	(1,793		)
Section 165(g) worthless stock deduction	—			(5,746		)	—
Alternative minimum tax	529			(529		)	—
Taxable dividend from foreign subsidiary	752			—			—
Other	38			833			1,289
Benefit for income taxes	$	(32,287	)	$	(7,039	)	$	(34,063	)

The components of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at February 28, 2013 and February 28, 2014 are as follows:



	2013			2014
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	29,070		$	27,963
Intangible assets	17,051			12,127
Compensation relating to stock options	2,884			2,199
Interest rate exchange agreement	43			38
Deferred revenue	2,049			1,639
Accrued rent	1,567			1,897
Tax credits	1,405			1,927
Investments in subsidiaries	320			352
Other	1,116			2,181
Valuation allowance	(40,863		)	(970		)
Total deferred tax assets	14,642			49,353
Deferred tax liabilities
Indefinite-lived intangible assets	(37,952		)	(40,549		)
Property and equipment	(1,507		)	(569		)
Cancellation of debt income	(13,136		)	(13,136		)
Other	(119		)	—
Total deferred tax liabilities	(52,714		)	(54,254		)
Net deferred tax liabilities	$	(38,072	)	$	(4,901	)

A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The Company historically recorded a full valuation allowance on all U.S. (federal and state) deferred tax assets. During the year ended February 28, 2014, due to improved operating results, the Company determined that a valuation allowance on most of its deferred tax assets was no longer appropriate and reversed the valuation allowance on all U.S. deferred tax assets (with the exception of certain state NOL DTA's). The Company decreased its valuation allowance for all jurisdictions by a net of $39.9 million, from $40.9 million as of February 28, 2013 to $1.0 million as of February 28, 2014.

Table of Contents

The Company has federal NOLs of $62 million and state NOLs of $164 million available to offset future taxable income. These net operating losses include an unrealized benefit of approximately $1.4 million related to share-based compensation that will be recorded in equity when realized. The federal net operating loss carryforwards begin expiring in 2028, and the state net operating loss carryforwards expire between the years ending February 2014 and February 2034. A valuation allowance has been provided for the net operating loss carryforwards related to states in which the Company no longer has operating results as it is more likely than not that substantially all of these net operating losses will expire unutilized.

The $1.9 million of tax credits at February 28, 2014 relate primarily to alternative minimum tax carryforwards that can be carried forward indefinitely. This amount also includes tax credits in Indiana and Texas that are expected to be fully utilized prior to expiration.

The Company has adopted FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740-10, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“ASC 740-10”). ASC 740-10 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by prescribing a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken within a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. As of February 28, 2014, the estimated value of the Company’s net uncertain tax positions is approximately $0.2 million, most of which is included in other noncurrent liabilities, as the Company does not expect to settle the items within the next 12 months.

The following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ending February 28, 2013 and February 28, 2014:



	For the year ending February 28,
	2013			2014
Gross unrecognized tax benefit – opening balance	$	(525	)	$	(683	)
Gross increases – tax positions in prior periods	(158		)	—
Gross decreases—settlements with taxing authorities	—			525
Gross unrecognized tax benefit – ending balance	$	(683	)	$	(158	)

Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at February 28, 2014 and February 28, 2013 are $0.2 million and $0.7 million of tax benefits that, if recognized, would reduce the Company’s provision for income taxes. Due to the uncertain and complex application of tax regulations, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of audits may result in liabilities that could be different from this estimate. In such case, the Company will record additional tax expense or tax benefit in the tax provision, or reclassify amounts on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in the period in which such matter is effectively settled with the taxing authority.

The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties as income tax expense. Related to the uncertain tax benefits noted above, the Company accrued an immaterial amount of interest during the year ending February 28, 2014 and in total, as of February 28, 2014, has recognized a liability for interest of $2 thousand.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state jurisdictions and various international jurisdictions. The Company has a number of federal, state and foreign income tax years still open for examination as a result of the net operating loss carryforwards. Accordingly the Company is subject to examination for both U.S. federal and certain state tax return purposes for the years ending February 29, 2004 to present.

14. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company’s operations are aligned into two business segments: (i) Radio and (ii) Publishing. These business segments are consistent with the Company’s management of these businesses and its financial reporting structure. Corporate expenses are not allocated to reportable segments. The results of operations of various sold businesses have been classified as discontinued operations and have been excluded from the segment disclosures below. See Note 1 for more discussion of our discontinued operations. Our radio operations in New York and Los Angeles, including the LMA fee we receive from a subsidiary of Disney, accounted for approximately 50% of our radio revenues for the year ended February 28, 2014. The Company’s segments operate exclusively in the United States.

The accounting policies as described in the summary of significant accounting policies included in Note 1 to these consolidated financial statements, are applied consistently across segments.

Table of Contents



Year Ended February 28, 2014	Radio			Publishing		Corporate			Consolidated
Net revenues	$	145,399		$	59,747	$	—		$	205,146
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense	99,924			59,085		—			159,009
Corporate expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense	—			—		17,024			17,024
Hungary license litigation and related expenses	2,058			—		—			2,058
Depreciation and amortization	2,476			235		2,155			4,866
Gain on sale of fixed assets	(10		)	2		—			(8		)
Operating income (loss)	$	40,951		$	425	$	(19,179	)	$	22,197



Year Ended February 28, 2013	Radio			Publishing			Corporate			Consolidated
Net revenues	$	138,630		$	57,454		$	—		$	196,084
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense	95,830			58,241			—			154,071
Corporate expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense	—			—			17,819			17,819
Hungary license litigation and related expenses	1,381			—			—			1,381
Impairment loss	10,971			448			—			11,419
Depreciation and amortization	2,451			318			1,953			4,722
Loss on sale of fixed assets	(9,897		)	20			—			(9,877		)
Operating income (loss)	$	37,894		$	(1,573	)	$	(19,772	)	$	16,549



Year Ended February 29, 2012	Radio		Publishing		Corporate			Consolidated
Net revenues	$	144,826	$	57,392	$	—		$	202,218
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense	110,772		56,522		—			167,294
Corporate expenses excluding depreciation and amortization expense	—		—		19,096			19,096
Hungary license litigation and related expenses	871		—		—			871
Depreciation and amortization	2,970		365		1,390			4,725
Gain on sale of fixed assets	797		1		—			798
Operating income (loss)	$	29,416	$	504	$	(20,486	)	$	9,434



			As of February 28, 2013
	Radio		Publishing		Corporate		Consolidated
Assets — continuing operations	$	209,721	$	21,005	$	30,136	$	260,862
Assets — discontinued operations	630		132		—		762
Total assets	$	210,351	$	21,137	$	30,136	$	261,624

			As of February 28, 2014
	Radio		Publishing		Corporate		Consolidated
Total assets	$	211,281	$	21,809	$	32,258	$	265,348

Table of Contents

15. OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME, NET

Components of other (expense) income, net for the three years ended February 2012, 2013 and 2014 were as follows:



	For the year ended February 28 (29),
	2012			2013			2014
(Loss) income from unconsolidated affiliate, including other-than-temporary impairment losses:
Merlin Media LLC	$	(16,377	)	$	—		$	—
Other investments	345			(211		)	96
Interest income	122			87			38
Other	(41		)	114			(18		)
Total other (expense) income, net	$	(15,951	)	$	(10	)	$	116

16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the year ended February 28, 2013, Emmis forgave a $1.2 million loan receivable from Mr. Jeffrey H. Smulyan, our Chariman, Chief Executive Officer and President in connection with the execution of a new three-year employment agreement. This non-cash charge is included in corporate expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization expense, in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ending February 28, 2013. The forgiven loan was grandfathered under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Emmis no longer makes loans to executive officers and directors.

Prior to 2002, the Company had made certain life insurance premium payments for the benefit of Mr. Smulyan. The Company discontinued making such payments in 2001; however, pursuant to a Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement and Limited Collateral Assignment dated November 2, 1997, the Company retains the right, upon Mr. Smulyan’s death, resignation or termination of employment, to recover all of the premium payments it has made, which total $1.1 million.

Table of Contents

17. SUMMARIZED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

The following table presents unaudited operating results for each quarter within the two most recent years. The Company believes that all necessary adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, have been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly the following quarterly results when read in conjunction with the financial statements included elsewhere in this report. Results of operations for any particular quarter are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for a full year. The Company’s financial results are also not comparable from quarter to quarter due to: (1) the seasonality of revenues, with revenues usually the lowest in the last quarter of each fiscal year; (2) the refinancing of our Credit Agreement in December 2012, which resulted in lower overall borrowing rates as described in Note 5, Long-Term Debt; (3) the impairment of a broadcast license in New York recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 as described in Note 10, Intangible Assets and Goodwill; (4) the Company’s gain on sale of the intellectual property of WRKS-FM to YMF of $10.0 million as discussed in Note 9, Other Significant Transactions; (5) the Company's various dispositions as discussed in Note 8, Acquisitions and Dispositions; and (6) the reversal of a valuation allowance on most of Emmis' deferred tax assets due to improved operating results during the quarter ended February 28, 2014, as discussed in Note 13, Income Taxes.



	Year ended February 28, 2014
	First Quarter		Second Quarter		Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter
	(in 000's except per share data)
Net revenues	$	50,586	$	54,967	$	52,621	$	46,972
Operating income	$	7,046	$	5,704	$	8,711	$	736
Consolidated net income	$	4,957	$	3,925	$	5,668	$	34,105
Basic earnings (loss) per common share	$	0.09	$	0.06	$	0.11	$	0.82
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share	$	0.08	$	0.05	$	0.09	$	0.71



	Year ended February 28, 2013
	First Quarter			Second Quarter			Third Quarter		Fourth Quarter
	(in 000's except per share data)
Net revenues	$	48,968		$	52,929		$	50,886	$	43,301
Operating income (loss)	$	1,124		$	7,617		$	8,158	$	(350	)
Consolidated net (loss) income	$	(2,873	)	$	40,208		$	5,636	$	5,280
Basic (loss) earnings per common share:
Continuing operations	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.02	)	$	0.02	$	(0.14	)
Discontinued operations	$	(0.06	)	$	1.00		$	0.10	$	0.25
Net (loss) income available to common shareholders	$	(0.13	)	$	0.98		$	0.12	$	0.11
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share:
Continuing operations	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.02	)	$	0.02	$	(0.14	)
Discontinued operations	$	(0.06	)	$	1.00		$	0.08	$	0.25
Net (loss) income available to common shareholders	$	(0.13	)	$	0.98		$	0.10	$	0.11

18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

2012 Retention Plan & Trust

On March 5, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the exercise of the Company's repurchase option under the Voting and Transfer Restriction Agreement with the trustee of the 2012 Retention Plan & Trust. Pursuant to the exercise of that option, the Company repurchased 400,000 shares of Preferred Stock from the trustee in exchange for 975,848 shares of the Company's Class A Common Stock. On April 2, 2014, 975,848 shares of Class A Common Stock were distributed to employees who met the vesting requirements of the plan. See Note 3, Redeemable Preferred Stock, for more discussion of the 2012 Retention Plan & Trust.

Hungary License Litigation

On April 16, 2014, the arbitral tribunal in Emmis International Holding, B.V., Emmis Radio Operating, B.V. and MEM Magyar Electronic Media Kereskedelmi es Szolgaltato Kft. v. Hungary (ICSID CASE NO. ARB/12/2) issued its ruling that the

Table of Contents

International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes ("ICSID") did not have jurisdiction to hear the case in which Emmis and the other owner of Slager sought damages for the unlawful taking of the station’s radio license in 2009.

After losing its license in 2009, Slager Radio had initially sought redress in the Hungarian courts. After Slager's success in the Hungarian trial and appellate courts, the Hungarian Parliament changed the media law to take away the remedy that Slager was seeking. Emmis and the other owner then filed for arbitration in ICSID , believing that ICSID presented the best forum for redress of their claims. In light of the tribunal’s decision, Emmis is evaluating whether any other viable forums exist.

Second Amendment to Credit Agreement

On May 6, 2014, Emmis entered into the Second Amendment to Credit Agreement and Limited Consent (“Second Amendment”) which permits Emmis to acquire majority control of a technology company for total consideration not to exceed $6.0 million. In addition, the Second Amendment permits the exclusion of certain transaction-related costs associated with the acquisition of WBLS-FM and WLIB-AM in an aggregate amount not in excess of $1.25 million. No financial covenants were impacted by the Second Amendment and total costs were less than $0.1 million


ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.


ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this annual report, the Company evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its “disclosure controls and procedures” (“Disclosure Controls”). This evaluation (the “Controls Evaluation”) was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”).

Based upon the Controls Evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that as of February 28, 2014, our Disclosure Controls are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information relating to Emmis Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries that is required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)) that occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Emmis Communications Corporation’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, Emmis Communications Corporation’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by Emmis Communications Corporation’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:


(1)	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of Emmis Communications Corporation;

Table of Contents


(2)	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of Emmis Communications Corporation are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of Emmis Communications Corporation; and


(3)	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of Emmis Communications Corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management has evaluated the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2014, based on the control criteria established in a report entitled Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992 Framework), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on such evaluation, we have concluded that Emmis Communications Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is effective as of February 28, 2014. The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2014 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears on the following page.

Jeffrey H. Smulyan Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Patrick M. Walsh Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Emmis Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries

We have audited Emmis Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). Emmis Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Emmis Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2014, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Emmis Communications Corporation and Subsidiaries as of February 28, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 28, 2014 and our report dated May 8, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana

May 8, 2014


ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item with respect to directors or nominees to be directors of Emmis is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Proposal 2: Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance – Certain Committees of the Board of Directors,” “Corporate Governance – Code of Ethics” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders expected to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report applies. Information about executive officers of Emmis or its affiliates who are not directors or nominees to be directors is presented in Part I under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”


ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Corporate Governance – Compensation of Directors,” “Executive Compensation,” "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" and "Compensation Committee Report" in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders expected to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report applies.


ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Security Ownership of Beneficial Owners and Management” in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders expected to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report applies.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table gives information about our common stock and preferred stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under our 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, 2004 Equity Compensation Plan, 2010 Equity Compensation Plan, 2012 Equity Compensation Plan and 2012 Retention Plan as of February 28, 2014. Our shareholders have approved these plans.



	Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights	Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights		Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (A))
Plan Category	(A)	(B)		(C)
Class A common stock
Equity Compensation Plans
Approved by Security Holders	6,984,605	$	3.74	3,004,733
Equity Compensation Plans
Not Approved by Security Holders	—	—		—
Total	6,984,605	$	3.74	3,004,733
6.25% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
Equity Compensation Plans
Approved by Security Holders	—	—		400,000
Equity Compensation Plans
Not Approved by Security Holders	—	—		—
Total	—	—		400,000

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Corporate Governance – Independent Directors” and “Corporate Governance – Transactions with Related Persons” in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders expected to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report applies.

Table of Contents

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Matters Relating to Independent Registered Public Accountants” in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders expected to be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report applies.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

Financial Statements

The financial statements filed as a part of this report are set forth under Item 8.

Financial Statement Schedules

No financial statement schedules are required to be filed with this report.

Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as a part of this report:

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

Number

Exhibit Description

Filed

Herewith

Form

Period

Ending

Exhibit

Filing

Date

3.1

Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Emmis Communications Corporation, as amended effective September 4, 2012

10-Q

8/31/2012

3.1

10/11/2012

3.2

Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Emmis Communications Corporation

10-K

2/28/2014

3.2

5/8/2013

4.1

Form of stock certificate for Class A common stock

S-1

3.5

12/22/1993

10.1

Amended and Restated Credit and Term Loan Agreement dated November 2, 2006

8-K

10.1

11/7/2006

10.2

First Amendment and Consent to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement

8-K

10.1

3/6/2009

10.3

Second Amendment and Consent to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement

8-K

10.1

8/19/2009

10.4

Third Amendment and Consent to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement

8-K

10.2

3/30/2011

10.5

Fourth Amendment and Consent to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement

10-Q

11/30/2011

10.18

1/12/2012

10.6

Fifth Amendment and Consent to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement

10-K

2/29/2012

10.6

5/10/2012

10.7

Sixth Amendment and Consent to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement

10-K

2/29/2012

10.7

5/10/2012

10.8

Seventh Amendment and Consent to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement

8-K

10.1

8/30/2012

10.9

Eighth Amendment and Consent to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement

10-Q

11/30/2012

10.3

1/10/2013

10.10

Waiver and Amendment in connection with the Restated Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement

10-Q

8/31/2012

10.3

10/11/2012

10.11

Note Purchase Agreement, dated November 10, 2011, by and between Zell Credit Opportunities Master Fund, L.P. and Emmis Communications Corporation

TO-I

12/1/2011

10.12

First Amendment and Consent to Note Purchase Agreement by and between Zell Credit Opportunities Master Fund, L.P. and Emmis Communications Corporation

10-K

2/29/2012

10.9

5/10/2012

10.13

Second Amendment and Consent to Note Purchase Agreement by and between Zell Credit Opportunities Master Fund, L.P. and Emmis Communications Corporation

10-K

2/29/2012

10.10

5/10/2012

Table of Contents

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

Number

Exhibit Description

Filed

Herewith

Form

Period

Ending

Exhibit

Filing

Date

10.14

Third Amendment and Consent to Note Purchase Agreement by and between Zell Credit Opportunities Master Fund, L.P. and Emmis Communications Corporation

10-Q

8/31/2012

10.2

10/11/2012

10.15

Fourth Amendment and Consent to Note Purchase Agreement by and between Zell Credit Opportunities Master Fund, L.P. and Emmis Communications Corporation

10-Q

11/30/2012

10.2

1/10/2013

10.16

Credit Agreement, dated as of December 28, 2012, among Emmis Operating Company, as the Borrower, Emmis Communications Corporation., as the Parent, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agent and the lenders party thereto

8-K

10.2

12/28/2012

10.17

First Amendment to Credit Agreement, Security Agreement and Subsidiary Agreement

10-Q

11/30/2013

10.1

10/10/2013

10.18

Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, Security Agreement and Subsidiary Agreement

10.19

Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of May 7, 2012, by and between Emmis Communications Corporation and Jeffrey H. Smulyan ++

10-K

2/29/2012

10.18

5/10/2012

10.20

Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of July 10, 2012, by and between Emmis Operating Company and Jeffrey H. Smulyan ++

10-Q

5/31/2012

10.18

7/12/2012

10.21

Employment Agreement, dated as of December 26, 2012, by and between Emmis Operating Company and Jeffrey H. Smulyan ++

8-K

10.1

12/28/2012

10.22

Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of September 4, 2011, by and between Emmis Operating Company and Patrick M. Walsh ++

10-Q

11/30/2011

10.2

1/12/2012

10.23

Employment Agreement, dated as of September 4, 2011, by and between Emmis Operating Company and Patrick M. Walsh ++

10-Q

11/30/2011

10.1

1/12/2012

10.24

Employment Agreement, dated as of September 4, 2013, by and between Emmis Operating Company and Patrick M. Walsh ++

8-K

10.1

10/25/2013

10.25

Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2012, by and between Emmis Operating Company and J. Scott Enright ++

10-K

2/29/2012

10.24

5/10/2012

10.26

Employment Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2012, by and between Emmis Operating Company and J. Scott Enright ++

10-K

2/29/2012

10.25

5/10/2012

10.27

Employment Agreement, effective as of March 3, 2009, by and between Emmis Operating Company and Gary L. Kaseff ++

10-K/A

2/28/2009

10.31

10/9/2009

10.28

Amendment to Employment Agreement, effective as of March 1, 2013, by and between Emmis Operating Company and Gary L. Kaseff ++

10-K

2/28/2013

10.23

5/8/2013

10.29

Employment Agreement, effective as of March 1, 2013, by and between Emmis Operating Company and Gregory T. Loewen ++

10-K

2/28/2013

10.24

5/8/2013

10.30

Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2012, by and between Emmis Operating Company and Gregory T. Loewen ++

10-K

2/28/2013

10.25

5/8/2013

10.31

Employment Agreement, effective as of March 1, 2013, by and between Emmis Operating Company and Richard F. Cummings ++

10-K

2/28/2013

10.37

5/8/2013

Table of Contents

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

Number

Exhibit Description

Filed

Herewith

Form

Period

Ending

Exhibit

Filing

Date

10.32

Employment Agreement, effective as of March 1, 2014, by and between Emmis Operating Company and Richard F. Cummings ++

10.33

Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2012, by and between Emmis Operating Company and Richard F. Cummings ++

8-K

10.1

3/12/2012

10.34

Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2012, by and between Emmis Operating Company and Richard F. Cummings ++

8-K

10.1

3/12/2012

10.35

First Amendment to the Put and Call Agreement between KMVN, LLC, KMVN License, LLC , Grupo Radio Centro LA, LLC., 93.9 Holdings, Inc. and 93.9 License, LLC

10-Q

5/31/2012

10.14

7/12/2012

10.36

Second Amendment to the Put and Call Agreement between KMVN, LLC, KMVN License, LLC , Grupo Radio Centro LA, LLC., 93.9 Holdings, Inc. and 93.9 License, LLC

8-K

10.1

7/20/2012

10.37

Third Amendment to the Put and Call Agreement between KMVN, LLC, KMVN License, LLC , Grupo Radio Centro LA, LLC., 93.9 Holdings, Inc. and 93.9 License, LLC

10-Q

8/31/2012

10.4

10/11/2012

10.38

Emmis Communications Corporation 2012 Retention Plan and Trust Agreement ++/

10-Q

5/31/2012

10.15

7/12/2012

10.39

Voting and Transfer Restriction Agreement between Emmis Communications Corporation and Jeffrey H. Smulyan as Trustee for the 2012 Retention Plan and Trust ++

10-Q

5/31/2012

10.16

7/12/2012

10.40

Local Programming and Marketing Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2012, between Emmis Radio License Corporation of New York and New York AM Radio, LLC

8-K

10.1

4/26/2012

10.41

Participation Agreement dated as of April 26, 2012, among Emmis New York Radio LLC, Emmis New York Radio License LLC, Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, National Association and Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America

8-K

10.2

4/26/2012

10.42

Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 5, 2012, among Emmis Radio, LLC, Emmis Radio License Corporation of New York, YMF Media LLC and certain other parties thereto

8-K

10.3

4/26/2012

10.43

Form of Asset Purchase Agreement, dated October 1, 2012, among Emmis Publishing, L.P., Country Sampler, LLC and Big Sandy Realty, LLC

8-K

10.1

10/2/2012

10.44

8-K

10.2

12/28/2012

10.45

Bonus Plan for Fiscal Year Ending 2013 ++

8-K

Item

5.02

5/3/2013

10.46

Bonus Plan for Fiscal Year Ending 2014 ++

8-K

Item 5.02

3/10/2014

10.47

Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement ++

10-K

2/28/2013

10.39

5/8/2013

Incorporated by Reference

Table of Contents

Exhibit
Number

Exhibit Description

Filed
Herewith

Form

Period
Ending

Exhibit

Filing
Date

10.48

Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement ++

10-K

2/28/2013

10.40

5/8/2013

10.49

Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2014, by and between YMF Media New York LLC, YMF Media New York License LLC, and Emmis Radio, LLC.

8-K

10.1

2/12/2014

10.50

Exhibit P to Purchase and Sale Agreement: Form of WBLS-WLIB LLC Operating Agreement

8-K

10.2

2/12/2014

10.51

Local Programming and Marketing Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2014, by and among Emmis Radio, LLC, YMF Media New York LLC and YMF Media New York License LLC.

8-K

10.3

2/12/2014

Subsidiaries of Emmis

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Powers of Attorney

31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer of Emmis Communications Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act

31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer of Emmis Communications Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange Act

32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer of Emmis Communications Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer of Emmis Communications Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document



++	Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Table of Contents

Signatures.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



	EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

Date: May 8, 2014	By:	/s/ Jeffrey H. Smulyan
		Jeffrey H. Smulyan
		Chairman of the Board,
		President and Chief Executive Officer

100

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



	SIGNATURE	TITLE

Date: May 8, 2014	/s/ Jeffrey H. Smulyan	President, Chairman of the Board and
	Jeffrey H. Smulyan	Director (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: May 8, 2014	/s/ Patrick M. Walsh	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
	Patrick M. Walsh	Chief Operating Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: May 8, 2014	Susan B. Bayh*	Director
	Susan B. Bayh

Date: May 8, 2014	James M. Dubin*	Director
	James M. Dubin

Date: May 8, 2014	Gary L. Kaseff*	Director
	Gary L. Kaseff

Date: May 8, 2014	Richard A. Leventhal*	Director
	Richard A. Leventhal

Date: May 8, 2014	Peter A. Lund*	Director
	Peter A. Lund

Date: May 8, 2014	Greg A. Nathanson*	Director
	Greg A. Nathanson

Date: May 8, 2014	Lawrence B. Sorrel*	Director
	Lawrence B. Sorrel



*By:		/s/ J. Scott Enright
		J. Scott Enright Attorney-in-Fact

101