e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal
Year Ended January 3,
2010
|
or
|
|
o
|
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission File
Number: 0-25123
P.F. Changs China Bistro,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
86-0815086
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
7676 East Pinnacle Peak Road
Scottsdale, AZ
|
|
85255
(Zip Code)
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(480) 888-3000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par Value
|
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such report(s), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants common stock
held by non-affiliates as of the last day of the
registrants second fiscal quarter ended, June 28,
2009, was $374,486,928.
On February 12, 2010 there were outstanding
22,933,862 shares of the registrants Common Stock.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
(to the extent indicated herein)
Specified portions of the registrants Proxy Statement with
respect to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held
April 22, 2010 are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this Report.
PART I
General
P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc. (P.F.
Changs or the Company) was incorporated
in January 1996 as a Delaware corporation. We conducted our
initial public offering in December 1998. We incorporated our
subsidiary, Pei Wei Asian Diner, Inc., in December 1999 as a
Delaware corporation. We report our financial and descriptive
information according to two reportable operating segments: P.F.
Changs China Bistro (Bistro) and Pei Wei Asian
Diner (Pei Wei) (see Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements Note 19 Segment
Reporting).
As of January 3, 2010, we owned and operated 197 full
service Bistro restaurants that feature a blend of high quality,
Chinese-inspired cuisine and attentive service, in a high-energy
contemporary bistro setting. Our restaurants offer intensely
flavored, highly memorable culinary creations, prepared from
fresh ingredients, including premium herbs and spices imported
directly from China. The menu features traditional Chinese
offerings and innovative dishes that illustrate the emerging
influence of Southeast Asia on modern Chinese cuisine. Our menu
is complemented by a full service bar offering an extensive
selection of wines, specialty drinks, Asian beers, sake,
cappuccino and espresso. We offer superior customer service in a
high energy atmosphere and a decor that includes wood and slate
floors, life-size replicas of the terra cotta Xian
warriors and narrative murals depicting scenes of life in
ancient China. Additionally, there are two Bistro locations
located in Hawaii and two Bistro locations located in
international markets that are operated by business partners
under licensing agreements.
As of January 3, 2010, we also owned and operated 166 quick
casual Pei Wei restaurants that serve freshly prepared,
wok-seared, contemporary pan-Asian cuisine in a relaxed, warm
environment with friendly attentive counter service and take-out
flexibility. Pei Wei offers the same spirit of hospitality and
commitment to providing fresh, high quality Asian food at a
great value that has made our Bistro restaurants successful. Pei
Wei opened its first unit in the Phoenix, Arizona metro-area in
July 2000.
Concept
and Strategy
Our objectives are to develop and operate a nationwide system of
Asian-inspired restaurants that offer guests a sophisticated
dining experience, create a loyal customer base that generates a
high level of repeat business and provide superior returns to
our investors. To achieve our objectives, we strive to offer
high quality Asian cuisine in a memorable atmosphere while
delivering superior customer service and an excellent dining
value. Key to our strategy and success at the restaurant level
is a philosophy that allows regional managers, general managers
and executive chefs to participate in the profitability of the
restaurants for which they have responsibility. We have
established Bistro and Pei Wei restaurants in a wide variety of
markets across the United States.
Menu
Bistro
The menu for our Bistro restaurants offers a harmony of taste,
texture, color and aroma by balancing the Chinese principles of
fan and tsai, which mean balance
and moderation. Fan foods include rice,
noodles, grains and dumplings, while tsai foods
include vegetables, meat, poultry and seafood. To further
encourage the Chinese principles of fan and tsai, our menu
is served family-style, the traditional Chinese way of dining.
Our chefs are trained to produce distinctive Chinese cuisine
using traditional recipes from the major culinary regions of
China updated with a contemporary twist. The intense heat of
Mandarin-style wok cooking sears in the clarity and distinct
flavor of fresh ingredients. Slow-roasted Northern-style BBQ
spare ribs are prepared in vertical ovens, while handmade
shrimp, pork and vegetable dumplings, as well as flavorful fish
and vegetables, are prepared in custom-made steamer cabinets.
The menu is highlighted by dishes such as Changs Spicy
Chicken, Mongolian Beef, Dumplings, Changs Chicken Lettuce
Wraps, Oolong Marinated Sea Bass and Dan Dan Noodles. We also
offer an array of vegetarian dishes and are able to modify
dishes to accommodate our customers with special dietary needs,
including a gluten free menu. No MSG is added to any ingredients
at our restaurants.
3
As a result of our extensive research and development efforts,
we periodically change our menu. For example, during 2009 the
Bistro introduced Changs for Two, a prix-fixe menu
offering a four-course meal for two people for $39.95. The menu
includes two soups, one starter, two entrees and two mini
desserts, all of which can be chosen from an extensive selection
of signature dishes and guest favorites. Changs for Two
allows our customers to enjoy a premium dining experience that
offers both enticing culinary cuisine and great value.
Additionally, in early 2010, the Bistro added a new daily Happy
Hour from 3-6 PM at participating locations that includes
appetizers and drink specials priced from $3.00
$6.00. The Happy Hour menu includes all starters on the Bistro
menu as well as a variety of beer, wine, sake and signature
cocktails. Our Happy Hour rewards guests by providing appealing,
affordable cuisine and drinks at a great value on a daily basis.
Entrées at the Bistro range in price from $4.95
$22.95, and our starters range in price from $3.00
$13.00. The average check per guest, including alcoholic
beverages, is approximately $20.00 to $21.00. Sales of alcoholic
beverages, featuring an extensive selection of wine, Asian beer,
sake and signature cocktails, have constituted approximately 14%
to 15% of total revenues for each of the past three years.
Take-away sales comprise approximately 11% of Bistros
total revenues. Lunch and dinner contribute approximately 32%
and 68% of revenues, respectively.
Pei
Wei
The menu at Pei Wei also offers a variety of intensely flavored
culinary creations; however, this menu is more concise than that
of the Bistro and includes not only Chinese cuisine but other
Asian fare as well. As with the Bistro, Pei Wei has a high
energy exhibition kitchen featuring
made-to-order
items using traditional Mandarin-style wok cooking. Along with
our handmade dim sum, our guests can order traditional favorites
such as Chicken Lettuce Wraps and Mandarin Kung Pao Chicken,
while sampling a variety of Asian dishes such as Vietnamese
Chicken Salad Rolls, Pad Thai and Spicy Korean Beef.
Entrées at Pei Wei range in price from $6.50 to $9.00, with
starters ranging from $1.95 to $6.95. The average check per
guest at Pei Wei, including beer and wine sales, is
approximately $9.00 to $10.00. Sales of alcoholic beverages,
featuring limited selection of beer and wine, have constituted
approximately 1% to 2% of total revenues for each of the past
three years. Take-away sales comprise approximately 39% of Pei
Weis total revenues. Lunch and dinner contribute
approximately 43% and 57% of revenues, respectively.
Operations
Bistro
The Bistro strives to create a sophisticated dining experience
through the careful selection, training and supervision of
personnel. The staff of a typical Bistro restaurant consists of
an Operating Partner, three or four managers, a Culinary
Partner, one or two sous chefs and approximately 125 hourly
employees, many of whom work part-time. The Operating Partner of
each restaurant is responsible for the
day-to-day
operations of that restaurant, including the hiring, training
and development of personnel, as well as operating results. The
Culinary Partner is responsible for product quality, purchasing,
food costs and kitchen labor costs. We require our Operating
Partners and Culinary Partners to have significant experience in
the full service restaurant industry.
The Bistro has a comprehensive eight-week management development
program. This program consists of four weeks of culinary
training, including both culinary job functions and culinary
management, with the remaining four weeks focused on service
strategies, guest relations and administration. All salaried
hospitality and culinary management personnel are required to
successfully complete all sections of the program. Upon the
completion of each four-week section, each trainee must
successfully complete a comprehensive certification.
The Operating Partners are responsible for selecting hourly
employees for their restaurants and are responsible for
administering hourly staff training programs that are developed
by the training and culinary departments. The hourly employee
development program lasts between one and two weeks and focuses
on both technical and cultural knowledge.
4
Additionally, during fiscal 2009, the Bistro implemented a new
online ordering system to help facilitate take-away ordering.
The Bistro also added online reservation capabilities to its
website during 2009.
Pei
Wei
A typical staff at Pei Wei consists of a general manager, a
kitchen manager, one or two managers, and approximately
35 hourly employees. Our general managers are responsible
for the
day-to-day
operations of the restaurant, including the hiring, training and
development of personnel, as well as operating results. The
kitchen manager collaborates with the general manager on product
quality, purchasing, food cost and kitchen labor costs.
Pei Wei uses a comprehensive nine-week management training
program, which consists of six weeks of hands-on culinary
functions and culinary management, with the remaining three
weeks focusing on service strategies specific to dine-in and
take-away service, guest and employee relations and
administration. Upon completion of training, each new manager
must complete a comprehensive culinary and overall operations
certification.
Each Pei Wei hourly employee undergoes a week-long comprehensive
training program that focuses on the culinary knowledge required
for his or her specific position. After completion of the
program, each employee is required to pass a test specific to
their position prior to serving our guests.
Additionally, during fiscal 2009 Pei Wei implemented an online
ordering system to help facilitate take-away ordering. Digital
menu boards were also installed in all locations to facilitate
menu changes and product messaging.
Global
Brand Development
International
Based on our belief that our brands would work well in the
international market, we are selectively pursuing international
expansion of our Bistro restaurants. During the second quarter
of fiscal 2009, we signed two development and licensing
agreements with partners who will develop and operate Bistro
restaurants in international markets. The first two restaurants
under these development and licensing agreements opened in
Mexico City and Kuwait City during the fourth quarter of fiscal
2009. A third development and licensing agreement was also
signed during February 2010. We continue to engage in
discussions with additional potential partners regarding
expansion of the Bistro into various international markets. We
expect these relationships to take the form of license
agreements under which we would receive an initial territory
fee, store opening fees and ongoing royalty revenues based on a
percentage of international restaurant sales.
Retail
In August 2009, we entered into an exclusive licensing agreement
with Unilever to develop and launch a new premium line of frozen
Asian-style entrées in the U.S., under the P.F.
Changs brand. The new products are expected to be
available in retail outlets during the first half of fiscal
2010. We will receive ongoing royalty revenues based on a
percentage of product sales. These percentages will escalate
over the first three years of the agreement.
Marketing
We focus our business strategy on providing high quality, Asian
cuisine prepared by an attentive staff in a distinctive
environment at a great value. By focusing on the food, service
and ambiance of the restaurant, we strive to create an
environment that fosters repeat patronage and encourages
word-of-mouth
recommendations. We believe that
word-of-mouth
advertising is a key component in driving guests initial
trial and subsequent visits, and that creating a great
experience for guests will always be the ultimate marketing
vehicle.
To attract and retain new customers, we have historically
utilized a mix of marketing strategies including paid
advertising, public relations and local community involvement.
While we had used limited radio, print and outdoor advertising
in the past, over the past few years we began making more
significant investments in these marketing channels in key
markets. At the same time, we added online, direct mail, social
media, and customer relationship initiatives to the media mix to
both drive new customer trials and foster better ongoing
communication with our guests. We expect to continue these
efforts in fiscal 2010.
5
Management
Information Systems
We utilize an integrated information system to manage the flow
of information within each restaurant and between the
restaurants and the corporate office. This system includes a
point-of-sale
local area network that helps facilitate the operations of the
restaurant by recording sales transactions and printing orders
in the appropriate locations within the restaurant.
Additionally, the
point-of-sale
system is utilized to authorize, batch and transmit credit card
transactions, to record employee time clock information, to
schedule labor and to produce a variety of management reports.
Select information that is captured from this system is
transmitted to the corporate office on a daily basis, enabling
senior management to continually monitor operating results. We
believe that our current
point-of-sale
system will be an adequate platform to support our continued
expansion for the foreseeable future.
Supply
Chain Management
Our supply chain management function provides our restaurants
with high quality ingredients at competitive prices from
reliable sources. Consistent menu specifications, as well as
purchasing and receiving guidelines, ensure freshness and
quality. Because we utilize only fresh ingredients in all of our
menu offerings, inventory is maintained at a modest level. We
negotiate short-term and long-term contracts depending on demand
for the commodities used in the preparation of our products.
These contracts generally average from two to twelve months in
duration, though they can be longer at times for certain
commodities. With the exception of a portion of our commodities,
like produce, we utilize Distribution Market Advantage, a
cooperative of multiple food distributors located throughout the
United States, as the primary distributor of product to all of
our restaurants. We have a non-exclusive contract with
Distribution Market Advantage on terms and conditions that we
believe are consistent with those made available to similarly
situated restaurant companies. Our produce is distributed by a
network of local specialty distributors who service our
restaurants in adherence to our quality and safety standards.
Our most important items are contracted annually to stabilize
prices and ensure availability.
We believe that competitively priced alternative distribution
sources are available should they become necessary.
Asian-specific ingredients, primarily spices and sauces, are
usually sourced directly from Hong Kong, China, Taiwan and
Thailand. We have developed an extensive network of suppliers in
order to maintain an adequate supply of items that conform to
our brand and product specifications.
Competition
The restaurant business is intensely competitive with respect to
food quality, price-value relationships, ambiance, service and
location, and many existing restaurants compete with us at each
of our locations. Key competitive factors in the industry
include the quality and value of the food, quality of service,
price, dining experience, restaurant location and the ambiance
of the facilities. For the Bistro, our primary competitors
include mid-priced, full service casual dining restaurants. For
Pei Wei, our main competitors are other value-priced, quick
service concepts as well as locally owned and operated Asian
restaurants.
There are a number of well-established competitors with
substantially greater financial, marketing, personnel and other
resources than ours. In addition, many of our competitors are
well established in the markets where our operations are, or in
which they may be, located. While we believe that our
restaurants are distinctive in design and operating concept,
other companies may develop restaurants that operate with
similar concepts. Additionally, the rising popularity of Asian
food may result in increased competition from non-Asian
restaurants as well as other food outlets, such as supermarkets,
as they increase their number of Asian-inspired menu offerings.
Employees
At January 3, 2010, we employed approximately
26,000 persons, approximately 300 of whom were home office
and field personnel, approximately 1,700 of whom were unit
management personnel and the remainder of whom were hourly
restaurant personnel. Our employees are not covered by a
collective bargaining agreement. We consider our employee
relations to be good.
6
Unit
Economics
We believe that unit economics are critical to the long-term
success of any restaurant concept. Accordingly, we focus on
unit-level returns over time as a key measurement of our success
or failure. For analysis purposes, we group our restaurants by
the year in which they opened. We then compare each
class to its peers over time as well as to the
performance of the entire system. These unit economics are
available on our website: www.pfcb.com.
Access to
Information
Our Internet address is www.pfcb.com. We make available
at this address, free of charge, our annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
amendments to those reports, and beneficial ownership reports
filed by our directors and officers pursuant to Section 16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file such material with, or
furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.
The
failure of our existing or new restaurants to achieve expected
results could have a negative impact on our revenues and
financial results, including potential impairment of the
long-lived assets of our restaurants, and could negatively
impact our stock price.
We operated 197 full service Bistro restaurants and 166 quick
casual Pei Wei restaurants as of January 3, 2010, 15 of
which opened within the last twelve months. The results achieved
by these restaurants may not be indicative of longer term
performance or the potential market acceptance of restaurants in
other locations. There can be no assurance that any new
restaurant that we open will have similar operating results to
those of prior restaurants. Our new restaurants commonly take
several months to reach planned operating levels due to
inefficiencies typically associated with new restaurants,
including the training of new personnel, lack of market
awareness, inability to hire sufficient staff and other factors.
The failure of our existing or new restaurants to perform as
expected could have a significant negative impact.
We are subject to a number of significant risks that might cause
our actual results to vary materially from our historical
results or future projections including:
|
|
|
|
|
lower customer traffic or average guest check, which negatively
impacts comparable store sales, net revenues, operating income,
operating margins and earnings per share, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of initiatives by competitors and increased
competition generally;
|
|
|
|
lack of customer acceptance of new menu items or potential price
increases necessary to cover higher input costs;
|
|
|
|
unfavorable general economic conditions in the markets in which
we operate, including, but not limited to, downturns in the
housing market, higher interest rates, higher unemployment
rates, lower disposable income due to higher energy or other
consumer costs, lower consumer confidence, and other events or
factors that adversely affect consumer spending;
|
|
|
|
customers trading down to lower priced items
and/or
shifting to competitors with lower priced products; or
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer preferences or declines in general consumer
demand for Asian menu items
|
|
|
|
|
|
cost increases that are either wholly or partially beyond our
control, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
costs for commodities that we do not or cannot effectively hedge;
|
|
|
|
labor costs such as increased health care costs, general market
wage levels and workers compensation insurance costs;
|
|
|
|
operating expenses, such as utilities and other expenses that
are impacted by energy price fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
fair value fluctuations related to our cash-settled share-based
compensation awards;
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
litigation against the Company, particularly class action
litigation;
|
|
|
|
construction costs associated with new store openings;
|
|
|
|
information technology costs and other logistical resources
necessary to maintain and support the global growth of our
business; and
|
|
|
|
material interruptions in our supply chain, such as a material
interruption of ingredient supply due to the failures of
third-party suppliers, or interruptions in service by common
carriers that ship goods within our distribution channels
|
Additionally, we have historically experienced variability in
the amount and percentage of revenues attributable to preopening
expenses. We typically incur the most significant portion of
preopening expenses associated with a given restaurant within
the two months immediately preceding and the month of the
opening of the restaurant. Our experience has been that labor
and operating costs associated with a newly opened restaurant
for the first several months of operation are materially greater
than what can be expected after that time, both in aggregate
dollars and as a percentage of revenues. Accordingly, the volume
and timing of new restaurant openings has had, and may continue
to have, a meaningful impact on preopening expenses as well as
labor and operating costs. Due to the foregoing factors, results
for any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to
be expected for any other quarter or for a full fiscal year and
these fluctuations may cause our operating results to be below
expectations of public market analysts and investors, adversely
impacting our stock price.
Changes
in general economic and political conditions could affect
consumer spending and may harm our revenues, operating results
or liquidity.
General weak economic conditions may continue throughout fiscal
2010. As a result, our customers may continue to remain
apprehensive about the economy and maintain or further reduce
their already lowered level of discretionary spending. This
could impact the frequency with which our customers choose to
dine out or the amount they spend on meals while dining out,
thereby decreasing our revenues and potentially negatively
affecting our operating results. Additionally, we believe there
is a risk that if the current negative economic conditions
persist for a long period of time or become more pervasive,
consumers might make long-lasting changes to their discretionary
spending behavior, including dining out less frequently on a
more permanent basis.
Changes
in government legislation may increase our labor costs and have
a material adverse effect on our business and financial
results.
A substantial number of our restaurant personnel are hourly
workers whose wage rates are affected by increases in the
federal or state minimum wage or changes to tip credits. Tip
credits are the amounts an employer is permitted to assume an
employee receives in tips when the employer calculates the
employees hourly wage for minimum wage compliance
purposes. FICA tip credits resulting from tip credit reporting
are also a significant factor when calculating the
Companys effective tax rate. Mandated increases in minimum
wage levels and changes to the tip credit have recently been and
continue to be proposed and implemented at both federal and
state government levels. Additionally, as minimum wage rates
increase, we may need to increase not only the wages of our
minimum wage employees but also the wages paid to employees at
wage rates that are above minimum wage. Future legislation that
increases minimum wage rates or changes allowable tip credits
may increase our labor costs or effective tax rate and have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
Additionally, potential changes in labor legislation, including
all or parts of the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA),
could result in portions of our workforce being subjected to
greater organized labor influence. The EFCA, also referred to as
the card check bill, could impact the nature of
labor relations in the United States, specifically, how union
elections and contract negotiations are conducted. The EFCA aims
to make it easier for unions to form, and employers of unionized
employees may face mandatory, binding arbitration of labor
scheduling, costs and standards, which could increase the costs
of doing business. Although we do not currently have any union
employees, EFCA or similar labor legislation could have an
adverse effect on our business and
8
financial results by imposing requirements that could
potentially increase costs, reduce flexibility and impact our
ability to service our guests.
We are
dependent on sales concentrated in certain geographic areas as
well as sales generated by corporate spending.
Our financial performance is highly dependent on restaurants
located in California, Arizona, Nevada and Florida which
comprise one-third of our total store population. Additionally,
restaurants located in Texas comprise almost 20 percent of
our total store population. In recent years, certain of these
states have been more negatively impacted by the housing
downturn, unemployment and the overall economic crisis than
other geographic areas. As a result, we have seen a more
substantial decline in guest traffic at some of our restaurants
in these locations, which has adversely affected the operations
of the company as a whole. If we are unable to improve operating
performance in these geographic areas, our financial results
will continue to be adversely affected.
Our business is also influenced by the level of corporate travel
and entertainment spending by businesses as a significant
portion of our sales is generated by guests conducting business
at our restaurants. During fiscal 2009, there was a considerable
reduction in business travel and corporate spending in general,
which negatively impacted our revenues. Such reduced spending
could continue to have a significant negative impact on our
financial results until such time as corporate spending
increases.
Intense
competition in the restaurant industry could prevent us from
increasing or sustaining our revenues and
profitability.
The restaurant industry is intensely competitive with respect to
food quality, price-value relationships, ambiance, service and
location, and many restaurants compete with us at each of our
locations. Our competitors at the Bistro concept include
mid-price, full service, casual dining restaurants. For Pei Wei,
our main competitors are other value-priced, quick-service
concepts as well as locally owned and operated Asian
restaurants. There are a number of well-established competitors
with substantially greater financial, marketing, personnel and
other resources than ours, and many of our competitors are well
established in the markets where we have restaurants, or in
which we intend to locate restaurants. Additionally, other
companies may develop restaurants that operate with similar
concepts and the rising popularity of Asian food may result in
increased competition from non-Asian restaurants as well as
other food outlets.
Any inability to successfully compete with the other restaurants
in our markets may prevent us from increasing or sustaining our
revenues and profitability and could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows. We may also need to modify or refine
elements of our restaurant system to evolve our concepts in
order to compete with popular new restaurant formats or concepts
that develop from time to time. We cannot ensure that we will be
successful in implementing these modifications or that these
modifications will not reduce our profitability.
Global
Brand Development initiatives could negatively impact our
brand.
Our business expansion into international markets and retail
product licensing could create new risks to our brand and
reputation. We believe that we have selected high-caliber
International operating partners with significant experience in
restaurant operations; however, there is risk that our brand
could be harmed if customers have negative experiences at
International Bistro locations due to issues with food quality
or operational execution. Our new line of premium frozen
Asian-style entrées is expected to be available in retail
outlets during fiscal 2010. We believe that this new retail
product offering is a growth opportunity that allows our brand
to reach more customers more often. Though we believe our guests
will view it as a different experience from dining in our
restaurants, there is a risk that guests may be inclined to
visit our restaurants less frequently due to the availability of
similar products in retail outlets or they may develop a lower
opinion of our brand due to issues with food quality or overall
product expectations. If customers have negative perceptions or
experiences at International restaurants or with retail
products, our brand value could suffer which could have an
adverse effect on our business.
9
Damage
to our brands or reputation could negatively impact our
business.
Our success depends substantially on the value of our brands and
our reputation for offering a high quality, memorable experience
to our guests. Our brands have been highly rated in annual
consumer studies such as Restaurants &
Institutions annual Choice in Chains survey in which
P.F. Changs won honors in the casual dining and Asian
categories as well as across numerous demographic groups during
fiscal 2009. We believe that we must protect and grow the value
of our brands to continue to be successful in the future. Any
incident that erodes consumer trust in or affinity for our
brands could significantly reduce their value. If consumers
perceive or experience a reduction in food quality, service,
ambiance or in any way believes we failed to deliver a
consistently positive experience, our brand value could suffer
which could have an adverse effect on our business.
Additionally,
multi-unit
food service businesses such as ours can be materially and
adversely affected by widespread negative publicity of any type,
particularly regarding food quality, illness or public health
issues (such as epidemics or the prospect of a pandemic),
safety, injury or other health concerns. We have taken steps to
mitigate each of these risks. To minimize the risk of food-borne
illness, we have implemented a HACCP system for managing food
safety and quality. Nevertheless, these risks cannot be
completely eliminated and any outbreak of illness attributed to
our restaurants or within the food service industry in general
could cause a decline in our sales and have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations.
Litigation
could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
We are, from time to time, the subject of complaints or
litigation from guests alleging food borne illnesses, injuries
or other food quality, health or operational concerns. We may be
adversely affected by publicity resulting from such allegations,
regardless of whether such allegations are valid or whether we
are ultimately determined to be liable. We are also subject to
complaints or allegations from former or prospective employees
from time to time as well as vendors, landlords, and other
third-parties. A lawsuit or claim could result in an adverse
decision against us that could have a material adverse effect on
our business. Additionally, the costs and expense of defending
ourselves against lawsuits or claims, regardless of merit, could
have an adverse impact on our profitability and could cause
variability in our results compared to expectations.
We are subject to state dram shop laws and
regulations, which generally provide that a person injured by an
intoxicated person may seek to recover damages from an
establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to such
person. While we carry liquor liability coverage as part of our
existing comprehensive general liability insurance, we may still
be subject to a judgment in excess of our insurance coverage and
we may not be able to obtain or continue to maintain such
insurance coverage at reasonable costs, or at all.
Adverse
public or medical opinions about the health effects of consuming
our products or new information or attitudes regarding diet and
health could result in changes in regulations and consumer
eating habits that could adversely affect our
business.
Multi-unit
restaurant operators and foodservice operations have received
more scrutiny from regulators and health organizations in recent
years relating to the health effects of consuming certain
products. Regulations and consumer eating habits may change as a
result of new information or attitudes regarding diet and
health. Although our menu provides a range of healthy options,
an unfavorable report on our menu ingredients, the size of our
portions or the consumption of our menu items could influence
the demand for our offerings. These changes may include
regulations that impact the ingredients and nutritional content
of our menu items. For example, a number of states, counties and
cities are enacting menu labeling laws requiring
multi-unit
restaurant operators to make certain nutritional information
available to guests or restrict the sales of certain types of
ingredients in restaurants. The success of our restaurant
operations is dependent, in part, upon our ability to
effectively respond to changes in consumer health and disclosure
regulations and to adapt our menu offerings to trends in eating
habits. If consumer health regulations or consumer eating habits
change significantly, we may be required to modify or delete
certain menu items. We may experience higher costs associated
with the implementation and oversight of such changes. To the
extent we are unable to respond with appropriate changes to our
menu offerings, it could materially affect customer demand and
have an adverse impact on our business.
10
Our
failure to comply with governmental regulations could harm our
business and our reputation.
We are subject to regulation by federal agencies and to
licensing and regulation by state and local health, sanitation,
building, zoning, safety, fire and other departments relating to
the development and operation of restaurants. These regulations
include matters relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
the environment;
|
|
|
|
building construction;
|
|
|
|
zoning requirements;
|
|
|
|
the preparation and sale of food and alcoholic beverages;
|
|
|
|
employment; and
|
|
|
|
integrity and security of data.
|
Our facilities are licensed and subject to regulation under
state and local fire, health and safety codes. The development
and construction of additional restaurants will be subject to
compliance with applicable zoning, land use and environmental
regulations. We may not be able to obtain necessary licenses or
other approvals on a cost-effective and timely basis in order to
construct and develop restaurants in the future.
Various federal and state labor laws govern our operations and
our relationship with our employees, including minimum wage,
overtime, working conditions, fringe benefit and citizenship
requirements. In particular, we are subject to the regulations
of the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, or BCIS.
The United States Congress has recently been considering changes
to Federal immigration laws and various states, some of which
where we have significant operations, are also in the process of
considering or have already adopted new immigration laws. Some
of these new laws may adversely affect our operations by
increasing our obligations for compliance and oversight.
Although we require all workers to provide us with the
government-specified documentation evidencing their employment
eligibility, some of our employees may, without our knowledge,
be unauthorized workers. Unauthorized workers are subject to
seizure and deportation and may subject us to fines, penalties
or loss of our business license in certain jurisdictions. Any
material disruption of our business, as a result of seizure of
our workers, changes in immigration law, or significantly
increased labor costs at our facilities in the future, could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and operating results.
In fiscal 2009, approximately 14 percent of our revenues at
the Bistro and 1 percent of revenues at Pei Wei were
attributable to the sale of alcoholic beverages. We are required
to comply with the alcohol licensing requirements of the federal
government, states and municipalities where our restaurants are
located. Alcoholic beverage control regulations require
applications to state authorities and, in certain locations,
county and municipal authorities for a license and permit to
sell alcoholic beverages. Typically, licenses must be renewed
annually and may be revoked or suspended for cause at any time.
Alcoholic beverage control regulations relate to numerous
aspects of the daily operations of the restaurants, including
minimum age of guests and employees, hours of operation,
advertising, wholesale purchasing, inventory control and
handling, storage and dispensing of alcoholic beverages. If we
fail to comply with federal, state or local regulations, our
licenses may be revoked and we may be forced to terminate the
sale of alcoholic beverages at one or more of our restaurants.
We receive and maintain certain personal information about our
guests and employees. The use of this information by us is
regulated at the federal and state levels. If our security and
information systems are compromised or our business associates
fail to comply with these laws and regulations and this
information is obtained by unauthorized persons or used
inappropriately, it could adversely affect our reputation, as
well as results of operations, and could result in litigation
against us or the imposition of penalties. As privacy and
information security laws and regulations change, we may incur
additional costs to ensure we remain in compliance.
The federal Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits
discrimination on the basis of disability in public
accommodations and employment. We are required to comply with
the Americans with Disabilities Act and regulations relating to
accommodating the needs of the disabled in connection with the
construction of new facilities and with significant renovations
of existing facilities.
11
Failure to comply with these and other regulations could
negatively impact our business and our reputation.
Changes
in food costs could negatively impact our revenues and results
of operations.
Our profitability is dependent in part on our ability to
anticipate and react to changes in food costs. Other than for a
portion of our commodities, such as produce, which are purchased
locally by each restaurant, we rely on Distribution Market
Advantage, a cooperative of multiple food distributors located
throughout the nation, as the primary distributor of our
ingredients. We have a non-exclusive contract with Distribution
Market Advantage on terms and conditions that we believe are
consistent with those made available to similarly situated
restaurant companies. Although we believe that alternative
distribution sources are available, any increase in distribution
prices or failure to perform by the Distribution Market
Advantage could cause our food costs to fluctuate. Any
disruption in the supply of specialty items from China due to
quality or availability issues could also cause our food costs
to fluctuate. Additional factors beyond our control, including
adverse weather conditions and governmental regulation, may
affect our food costs. We may not be able to anticipate and
react to changing food costs through our purchasing practices
and menu price adjustments in the future, and failure to do so
could negatively impact our revenues and results of operations.
Our
inability to retain key personnel could negatively impact our
business.
Our success will continue to be highly dependent on our key
operating officers and employees. We must continue to attract,
retain and motivate a sufficient number of qualified management
and operating personnel, including regional managers, general
managers and executive chefs, to maintain consistency in the
quality and atmosphere of our restaurants. Additionally, the
ability of these key personnel to maintain consistency in the
quality of our product offerings and service and atmosphere of
our restaurants is a critical factor in our success. Any failure
to attract, retain and motivate key personnel may harm our
reputation and result in a loss of business.
Development
is critical to our long-term success.
Critical to our long-term future success is our ability to
successfully expand our operations. We have expanded from seven
restaurants at the end of 1996 to 363 restaurants as of
January 3, 2010. We expect to open three to five new Bistro
restaurants and three to five new Pei Wei restaurants during
fiscal 2010. Our ability to expand successfully will depend on a
number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
identification and availability of suitable locations;
|
|
|
|
competition for restaurant sites;
|
|
|
|
negotiation of favorable lease arrangements;
|
|
|
|
timely development of commercial, residential, street or highway
construction near our restaurants;
|
|
|
|
management of the costs of construction and development of new
restaurants;
|
|
|
|
securing required governmental approvals and permits;
|
|
|
|
recruitment of qualified operating personnel, particularly
managers and chefs;
|
|
|
|
weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
competition in new markets; and
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions, including those arising from the
current economic crisis described above.
|
The opening of additional restaurants in the future will depend
in part upon our ability to generate sufficient funds from
operations or to obtain sufficient equity or debt financing on
favorable terms to support our expansion as well as the
availability of high-quality commercial real estate projects of
the type we typically target for new locations. We may not be
able to open our planned new restaurants on a timely basis, if
at all, and, if opened, these restaurants may not be operated
profitably. We have experienced, and expect to continue to
experience, delays in restaurant openings from time to time.
Delays or failures in opening planned new restaurants could have
an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results
of operations or cash flows.
12
Federal,
state and local tax rules can adversely impact our results of
operations and financial position.
We are subject to federal, state and local taxes in the
U.S. Significant judgment is required in determining the
provision for income taxes. Although we believe our tax
estimates are reasonable, if the IRS or other taxing authority
disagrees with the positions we have taken on our tax returns,
we could have additional tax liability, including interest and
penalties. If material, payment of such additional amounts upon
final adjudication of any disputes could have a material impact
on our results of operations and financial position.
Complying with new tax rules, laws or regulations could impact
our financial condition and increases to federal or state
statutory tax rates and other changes in tax laws, rules or
regulations may increase our effective tax rate. Any increase in
our effective tax rate could have a material impact on our
financial results.
Fluctuating
insurance requirements and costs could negatively impact our
profitability and projections.
The cost of workers compensation insurance, general
liability insurance and directors and officers liability
insurance fluctuates based on market conditions and availability
as well as our historical trends. We self-insure a substantial
portion of our workers compensation and general liability
costs and unfavorable changes in trends could have a negative
impact on our profitability.
Additionally, health insurance costs in general have risen
significantly over the past few years and are expected to
continue to increase in 2010. These increases, as well as
potential legislation requirements for employers to provide
specified levels of health insurance to all employees, could
have a negative impact on our profitability if we are not able
to offset the effect of such increases with plan modifications
and cost control measures, or by continuing to improve our
operating efficiencies.
Our
marketing programs may not be successful.
We have significantly increased in our marketing expenditures
over the past few years and expect to continue investing in
campaigns and initiatives designed to attract and retain guests.
These efforts may not be successful, resulting in expenses
incurred without the benefit of higher revenues.
Potential
labor shortages may delay planned openings or damage customer
relations.
Our success will continue to depend on our ability to attract
and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees, including
kitchen staff and wait staff, to work our restaurants. Our
inability to recruit and retain qualified individuals may delay
the planned openings of new restaurants while high employee
turnover in existing restaurants may negatively impact customer
service and customer relations, resulting in an adverse effect
on our revenues or results of operations.
The
inability to develop and construct our restaurants within
projected budgets and time periods could adversely affect our
business and financial condition.
Each of our restaurants is distinctively designed to accommodate
particular characteristics of each location and to blend local
or regional design themes with our principal trade dress and
other common design elements. This presents each location with
its own development and construction risks. Many factors may
affect the costs and timeframes associated with the development
and construction of our restaurants, including:
|
|
|
|
|
landlord delays;
|
|
|
|
labor disputes;
|
|
|
|
shortages of materials and skilled labor;
|
|
|
|
weather interference;
|
|
|
|
unforeseen engineering problems;
|
|
|
|
environmental problems;
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
construction or zoning problems;
|
|
|
|
local government regulations;
|
|
|
|
modifications in design to the size and scope of the
projects; and
|
|
|
|
other unanticipated increases in costs, any of which could give
rise to delays or cost overruns.
|
If we are not able to develop additional restaurants within
anticipated budgets or time periods, our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely
affected.
The
seasonality of our business could result in fluctuations in our
financial performance
Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. Our sales
volumes are generally higher in the winter months and lower in
the summer months, which can cause fluctuations in our operating
results from
quarter-to-quarter
within a fiscal year. As a result, results of operations for any
single quarter are not indicative of results that may be
achieved for a full fiscal year. Additionally, quarterly
fluctuations in our results can impact the amount of quarterly
cash dividend payments, which are based on a fixed percentage of
net income.
Special
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements in this
Form 10-K
and the documents we incorporate by reference constitute
forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking
statements can be identified by terms such as may,
will, should, expect,
plan, intend, forecast,
anticipate, believe,
estimate, predict,
potential, continue or the negative of
these terms or other comparable terminology. The forward-looking
statements contained in this document involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and situations that may cause our or our
industrys actual results, level of activity, performance
or achievements to be materially different from any future
results, levels of activity, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by these statements. Factors that might
cause actual events or results to differ materially from those
indicated by these forward-looking statements may include the
matters listed under Risk Factors and elsewhere in this
Form 10-K,
including, but not limited to, failure of our existing or new
restaurants to achieve predicted results, changes in general
economic and political conditions and changes in government
legislation may increase our labor costs. Because we cannot
guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements, undue reliance should not be placed on these
forward-looking statements.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
14
Our Bistro restaurants average 6,900 square feet and our
Pei Wei restaurants average 3,100 square feet. The
following table lists the number of existing Bistro and Pei Wei
locations by state as of January 3, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
Bistro
|
|
|
Pei Wei
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Arkansas
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
California
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Idaho
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Indiana
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Iowa
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Kansas
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Kentucky
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Mississippi
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Nebraska
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Nevada
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
New York
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Oregon
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Additionally, two international Bistro restaurants were opened
in Mexico City and Kuwait City during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2009 under international development and licensing
agreements. Two Bistro restaurants are also operated in Hawaii
under a joint venture arrangement in which we own a
noncontrolling interest.
Our home office is located in a 50,000 square foot office
building in Scottsdale, Arizona. We purchased the land and
building during 2004.
Expansion
Strategy and Site Selection
We have historically developed Bistro and Pei Wei restaurants in
both new and existing markets utilizing an expansion strategy
targeted at metropolitan areas throughout the United States.
Within each targeted metropolitan area, we identify specific
areas with high traffic patterns and suitable demographic
characteristics, including population density, consumer
attitudes and household income. Within an appropriate area, we
evaluate specific sites that provide visibility, accessibility
and exposure to traffic volume. Our site criteria are flexible,
as is evidenced by the variety of environments and facilities in
which we currently operate. These facilities include
freestanding buildings, regional malls, urban properties and
entertainment and strip centers.
We plan to open three to five new Bistro restaurants during
fiscal 2010 primarily located in existing markets. Additionally,
we plan to open three to five new Pei Wei restaurants during
fiscal 2010 in new and existing markets. As of the date of this
Form 10-K,
we had opened one of the new Pei Wei restaurants and none of the
new Bistro restaurants planned for fiscal 2010.
Bistros typically range in size from 6,000 to 7,500 square
feet, and require an average total capitalized investment of
approximately $3.5 million to $4.0 million per
restaurant (net of estimated tenant incentives). This total
investment includes the capitalized lease value of the property,
which can vary greatly depending on the specific location. We
expect that our planned future restaurants will require, on
average, a total cash investment per restaurant of approximately
$2.5 million to $3.0 million (net of estimated tenant
incentives). Preopening expenses are expected to average
approximately $350,000 to $400,000 per Bistro restaurant during
fiscal 2010.
Pei Wei restaurants typically range in size from 2,800 to
3,400 square feet and require an average total capitalized
investment of approximately $1.5 million per restaurant
(net of estimated tenant incentives). This total investment cost
includes the capitalized lease value of the property, which can
vary greatly depending on the specific location. We expect that
our planned future restaurants will require, on average, a total
cash investment per restaurant of approximately $750,000 to
$850,000 (net of estimated tenant incentives). Preopening
expenses are expected to average approximately $140,000 to
$160,000 per Pei Wei restaurant during fiscal 2010.
We currently lease the sites for all of our Bistro and Pei Wei
restaurants and do not intend to purchase real estate for our
sites in the future. Current restaurant leases have expiration
dates ranging from 2010 to 2025, with the majority of the leases
providing for at least one five-year renewal option. We are
currently negotiating with the landlords on lease renewal
options for three restaurant leases that are scheduled to expire
in 2010. Generally, our leases provide for minimum annual rent,
and most leases require additional rent based on a percentage of
sales volume in excess of minimum contractual levels at the
particular location. Most of our leases require us to pay the
costs of insurance, property taxes, and a portion of the
lessors operating costs. We do not anticipate any
difficulties renewing existing leases as they expire.
Item 3. Legal
Proceedings
We are engaged in legal actions arising in the ordinary course
of our business and believe that the ultimate outcome of these
actions will not have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations, liquidity or financial position.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
None.
16
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol PFCB.
The following table sets forth the high and low price per share
of our common stock for each quarterly period for our two most
recent fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
March 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
32.48
|
|
|
$
|
20.41
|
|
June 29, 2008
|
|
$
|
33.00
|
|
|
$
|
22.30
|
|
September 28, 2008
|
|
$
|
30.00
|
|
|
$
|
21.15
|
|
December 28, 2008
|
|
$
|
24.14
|
|
|
$
|
14.51
|
|
March 29, 2009
|
|
$
|
25.49
|
|
|
$
|
16.51
|
|
June 28, 2009
|
|
$
|
34.49
|
|
|
$
|
21.73
|
|
September 27, 2009
|
|
$
|
36.98
|
|
|
$
|
29.56
|
|
January 3, 2010
|
|
$
|
39.57
|
|
|
$
|
29.18
|
|
We have not historically paid any cash dividends. During
February 2010, the Board of Directors approved the initiation of
a quarterly variable cash dividend based on our desire to
consistently return excess cash flow to its shareholders. The
amount of the cash dividend will be computed based on 45% of
quarterly net income and is expected to total approximately
$0.90 per share during fiscal 2010. Based on seasonal
fluctuations in quarterly net income, the amount of cash
dividend payments, which are based on a fixed percentage of net
income, may fluctuate between quarters.
On February 12, 2010, there were 112 holders of record
of P.F. Changs common stock.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Our Board of Directors has authorized programs to repurchase our
outstanding shares of common stock from time to time in the open
market, pursuant to
Rule 10b5-1
trading plans or in private transactions at prevailing market
prices. Under previous share repurchase programs authorized by
our Board of Directors, we have repurchased a total of
5.1 million shares of our common stock for
$146.0 million at an average price of $28.83 since July
2006. Included in this total are 1.4 million shares of our
common stock repurchased during 2009 for $39.7 million at
an average price of $27.73.
In December 2009, our Board of Directors authorized a new share
repurchase program to repurchase up to $100.0 million of
our outstanding shares of common stock from time to time in the
open market or in private transactions at prevailing market
prices over the next two years. We intend to use cash on hand to
repurchase shares. We did not repurchase any shares under this
authorization during fiscal 2009.
The following table sets forth our share repurchases of common
stock during each period in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Maximum Dollar Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Shares that May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
|
Purchased Under the
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 28, 2009 November 1, 2009
|
|
|
112,409
|
|
|
$
|
33.76
|
|
|
|
112,409
|
|
|
$
|
7,040,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 2, 2009 November 29, 2009
|
|
|
93,450
|
|
|
$
|
31.25
|
|
|
|
93,450
|
|
|
$
|
4,120,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2009 January 3, 2010(1)
|
|
|
104,600
|
|
|
$
|
35.95
|
|
|
|
104,600
|
|
|
$
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
310,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310,459
|
|
|
$
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our previous share repurchase program expired on
December 31, 2009. Prior to program expiration, we
repurchased an additional 6,900 shares at an average price
of $38.71; however, these shares did not settle until after
January 3, 2010 and thus are not included in the amounts
shown for the December purchases period. The maximum dollar
value of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs
reflects our new share repurchase program, which was authorized
in December 2009. |
17
Performance
Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative five-year total
return on the Companys common stock with the cumulative
total returns of the Nasdaq Composite Index and the Russell 2000
Index, in each case assuming an initial investment of $100 on
January 2, 2005 and no dividend payments. Historical
performance should not be considered indicative of future
stockholder returns.
Comparison
of Cumulative Total Return from January 2, 2005 through
January 3, 2010
18
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following selected consolidated financial data should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto and Item 7, Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year(1)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Statement of Income Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,228,179
|
|
|
$
|
1,198,124
|
|
|
$
|
1,084,193
|
|
|
$
|
932,116
|
|
|
$
|
806,838
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
326,421
|
|
|
|
325,630
|
|
|
|
297,242
|
|
|
|
254,923
|
|
|
|
223,966
|
|
Labor
|
|
|
401,583
|
|
|
|
396,911
|
|
|
|
364,074
|
|
|
|
307,573
|
|
|
|
265,274
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
203,859
|
|
|
|
198,967
|
|
|
|
172,147
|
|
|
|
145,309
|
|
|
|
121,849
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
70,635
|
|
|
|
69,809
|
|
|
|
62,164
|
|
|
|
51,958
|
|
|
|
42,586
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
82,749
|
|
|
|
77,488
|
|
|
|
66,968
|
|
|
|
56,030
|
|
|
|
41,117
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
74,429
|
|
|
|
68,711
|
|
|
|
55,988
|
|
|
|
44,378
|
|
|
|
36,782
|
|
Preopening expense
|
|
|
3,919
|
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
14,310
|
|
|
|
11,922
|
|
|
|
9,102
|
|
Partner investment expense
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
(2,012
|
)
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,162,966
|
|
|
|
1,145,619
|
|
|
|
1,030,881
|
|
|
|
876,464
|
|
|
|
745,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
65,213
|
|
|
|
52,505
|
|
|
|
53,312
|
|
|
|
55,652
|
|
|
|
61,362
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(1,637
|
)
|
|
|
(3,362
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
1,315
|
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes
|
|
|
63,576
|
|
|
|
49,143
|
|
|
|
53,212
|
|
|
|
56,967
|
|
|
|
63,203
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(18,492
|
)
|
|
|
(12,193
|
)
|
|
|
(12,420
|
)
|
|
|
(14,078
|
)
|
|
|
(17,033
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
|
45,084
|
|
|
|
36,950
|
|
|
|
40,792
|
|
|
|
42,889
|
|
|
|
46,170
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(2)(3)
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
(7,591
|
)
|
|
|
(4,560
|
)
|
|
|
(1,520
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
44,605
|
|
|
|
29,359
|
|
|
|
36,232
|
|
|
|
41,369
|
|
|
|
46,023
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
4,169
|
|
|
|
8,116
|
|
|
|
8,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to PFCB
|
|
$
|
43,197
|
|
|
$
|
27,426
|
|
|
$
|
32,063
|
|
|
$
|
33,253
|
|
|
$
|
37,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB common
stockholders per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
$
|
1.47
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
22,986
|
|
|
|
23,776
|
|
|
|
25,473
|
|
|
|
26,075
|
|
|
|
26,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
23,413
|
|
|
|
24,080
|
|
|
|
25,899
|
|
|
|
26,737
|
|
|
|
27,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to PFCB:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
43,676
|
|
|
$
|
35,017
|
|
|
$
|
36,623
|
|
|
$
|
34,773
|
|
|
$
|
37,943
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
(7,591
|
)
|
|
|
(4,560
|
)
|
|
|
(1,520
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to PFCB
|
|
$
|
43,197
|
|
|
$
|
27,426
|
|
|
$
|
32,063
|
|
|
$
|
33,253
|
|
|
$
|
37,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
63,499
|
|
|
$
|
40,951
|
|
|
$
|
24,055
|
|
|
$
|
31,589
|
|
|
$
|
31,948
|
|
Short-term investments (including restricted short-term
investments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,410
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
652,150
|
|
|
|
667,363
|
|
|
|
622,630
|
|
|
|
514,045
|
|
|
|
474,859
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
82,496
|
|
|
|
90,828
|
|
|
|
13,723
|
|
|
|
5,360
|
|
Total PFCB common stockholders equity
|
|
|
335,349
|
|
|
|
320,826
|
|
|
|
293,887
|
|
|
|
289,525
|
|
|
|
293,898
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We operate on a 52/53-week year, with the fiscal year ending on
the Sunday closest to December 31. Fiscal year 2009 was
comprised of 53 weeks. Fiscal years 2008, 2007, 2006, and
2005 each were comprised of 52 weeks. |
|
(2) |
|
As a result of our decision to exit operations of Taneko, the
results of Taneko (including a related asset impairment charge
recognized during fiscal 2007) were classified as a
discontinued operation for all periods presented as discussed
further in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. |
|
(3) |
|
As a result of our decision to close 10 Pei Wei stores in fiscal
2008, the results of those 10 Pei Wei stores (including related
asset impairment, lease termination and severance charges
recognized during fiscal 2009 and 2008) were classified as
discontinued operations for all periods presented as discussed
further in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. |
No cash dividends were paid during any of the five previous
years.
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Overview
The following section presents an overview of our restaurant
concepts, other business lines, our growth strategy and
challenges we face. A summary of our 2009 financial results and
our 2010 outlook are also presented.
Restaurants
We own and operate two restaurant concepts in the Asian niche:
P.F. Changs China Bistro (Bistro) and Pei Wei
Asian Diner (Pei Wei). On August 1, 2008, we
sold the long-lived assets of Taneko Japanese Tavern
(Taneko), a third restaurant concept developed in
2006, which has been classified as a discontinued operation in
the Companys consolidated financial statements since the
end of fiscal 2007.
Bistro
As of January 3, 2010, we owned and operated 197 full
service Bistro restaurants that feature a blend of high quality,
traditional Chinese cuisine and attentive service in a high
energy contemporary bistro setting. P.F. Changs was formed
in early 1996 with the acquisition of the four original Bistro
restaurants and the hiring of an experienced management team.
Utilizing a partnership management philosophy, we embarked on a
strategic expansion of the concept targeted at major
metropolitan areas throughout the United States. We own and
operate all of our restaurants in the U.S. with the
exception of two Bistro restaurants located in Hawaii which are
operated under a joint venture arrangement in which we own a
noncontrolling interest. Additionally, two international Bistro
restaurants were opened in Mexico City and Kuwait City during
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 under international
development and licensing agreements.
Pei
Wei
As of January 3, 2010, we also owned and operated 166 quick
casual Pei Wei restaurants that serve freshly prepared,
wok-seared, contemporary pan-Asian cuisine in a relaxed, warm
environment with friendly attentive
20
counter service and take-out flexibility. We opened our first
Pei Wei restaurant in July 2000 in the Phoenix, Arizona area and
have expanded the concept significantly since that time. We
closed 10 Pei Wei restaurants during the fourth quarter of 2008
and the results of these restaurants are reported within
discontinued operations in our consolidated income statements
for all periods presented. See Note 2 to our consolidated
financial statements for further discussion.
Global
Brand Development
International
We are selectively pursuing international expansion of our
Bistro restaurants. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we
signed two development and licensing agreements with partners
who will develop and operate Bistro restaurants in international
markets. We expect these relationships to take the form of
license agreements under which we would receive an initial
territory fee, store opening fees and ongoing royalty revenues
based on a percentage of international restaurant sales.
The first development and licensing agreement was signed with
M.H. Alshaya, the Middle Easts leading retailer, to
develop 34 Bistro restaurants throughout the Middle East over
the next 10 years. The first restaurant opened in Kuwait
City during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
The second development and licensing agreement was signed with
Alsea S.A.B. de C.V., the leading quick service restaurant
operator in Mexico, to develop 30 Bistro restaurants in Mexico
over the next 10 years. The first restaurant opened in
Mexico City during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
Additionally, during February 2010, we signed a development and
licensing agreement with Global Restaurant Concepts, Inc., a
leading casual dining operator in the Philippines, to develop
eight restaurants over the next five years. The first restaurant
is scheduled to open in Manila during the first quarter of
fiscal 2011.
We continue to engage in discussions with additional potential
partners regarding expansion of the Bistro into various
international markets.
Retail
In August 2009, we entered into an exclusive licensing agreement
with Unilever to develop and launch a new premium line of frozen
Asian-style entrées in the U.S., under the P.F.
Changs brand. The new products are expected to be
available in retail outlets during the first half of fiscal
2010. We will receive ongoing royalty revenues based on a
percentage of product sales.
Other
Ventures
In August 2009, we announced an agreement with FRC Balance LLC,
d/b/a True Food Kitchen, to provide debt capital for the
early-stage development of True Food Kitchen restaurants. The
agreement provides for up to a $10.0 million loan facility
to develop True Food Kitchen restaurants and can, under certain
conditions, be converted by us into a majority equity position
in True Food Kitchen. As of January 3, 2010, no borrowings
were outstanding under the loan facility.
Our
strategy
Our objective is to be the best operator of Asian restaurants as
viewed by our guests and our employees. We aim to develop and
operate a nationwide system of Asian-inspired restaurants that
offer guests a sophisticated dining experience, create a loyal
customer base that generates a high level of repeat business and
provide superior returns to our investors. To achieve our
objectives, we strive to offer high quality Asian cuisine in a
memorable atmosphere while delivering exceptional customer
service and an excellent dining value.
We are currently operating restaurants exclusively in the Asian
niche due in part to the continued popularity of Asian cuisine,
combined with a relatively lower level of organized competition
in this segment compared to other popular cuisines segments such
as Mexican and Italian. We believe this creates a significant
long-term opportunity for us to both grow our existing
restaurant sales and open new locations in new and existing
markets. We are selective when choosing our new restaurant
locations and assess anticipated returns on invested capital at
both an
21
individual restaurant and market level when determining future
development plans. We seek an average unit-level return on
invested capital of 30 percent for both of our concepts and
plan to continue opening new restaurants to the extent that we
continue to achieve our target rate of return.
Our
challenges
Our business is highly sensitive to changes in guest traffic.
Increases in guest traffic drive higher sales, which improve the
leverage of our fixed operating costs and thus enable us to
achieve higher operating margins. As guest traffic decreases, as
it has during the past few years, lower sales result in
decreased leverage that can lead to deteriorations in our
operating margins. To help offset the negative impacts of
decreased leverage in a declining sales environment, our Bistro
and Pei Wei operators have undertaken a series of initiatives
designed to gain efficiencies at the restaurant level, with a
focus on labor and cost of sales improvement opportunities,
while taking special care to ensure that these initiatives do
not negatively impact our guests dining experience. These
initiatives included a focus on improved cross-training, food
preparation and scheduling, which created significant
improvement in back of the house labor efficiencies.
The restaurant industry can be significantly affected by changes
in discretionary spending patterns, economic conditions,
consumer tastes, lifestyle trends and cost fluctuations. In
recent years, consumers have been under increased economic
pressures and as a result, many have changed their discretionary
spending patterns. Many consumers dine out less frequently than
in the past or have reduced the amount they spend on meals while
dining out. Accordingly, we strive to continuously evolve and
refine the critical elements of our restaurant concepts to help
maintain and enhance the strength of our brands and remain fresh
and relevant to our guests while maintaining a high
value-to-price
perception. We continuously update our menu offerings and have
injected our restaurants with an updated contemporary look and
feel. We also continue to implement a number of new marketing
initiatives designed to increase brand awareness and help drive
guest traffic.
The restaurant business is intensely competitive with respect to
food quality, price-value relationships, ambiance, service and
location, and many existing restaurants compete with us at each
of our locations. Additionally, the continued popularity of
Asian cuisine may result in increased competition from new
Asian-branded concepts as well as non-Asian restaurants and
other food outlets, such as supermarkets, that may increase
their Asian-inspired menu offerings.
Our business is also influenced by the level of corporate travel
and entertainment spending by businesses as a significant
portion of our sales is generated by guests conducting business
at our restaurants. During fiscal 2009, there was a considerable
reduction in business travel and corporate spending in general,
which negatively impacted our fiscal 2009 revenues and is
expected to continue to have a significant effect on our results
until such time as corporate spending increases.
Our
2009 Financial Results
During 2009, we experienced continued deterioration in guest
traffic at our Bistro restaurants, while we saw improvement in
guest traffic at our Pei Wei restaurants. We achieved higher
operating margins at both concepts due to labor and operational
efficiencies, which contributed to higher income in fiscal 2009.
Our 2009 financial results include:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenue growth of 2.5 percent to
$1.2 billion, driven primarily by new restaurant openings
and the benefit of an extra week in fiscal 2009, partially
offset by a decline in sales at Bistro restaurants open longer
than 18 months;
|
|
|
|
An increase in income from continuing operations of
24.7 percent to $43.7 million primarily due to
operational efficiencies in cost of sales and labor and lower
preopening costs;
|
|
|
|
An increase in diluted income per share from continuing
operations attributable to PFCB of 29.0 percent to $1.87
due to a 24.7 percent increase in income from continuing
operations combined with the benefit of lower diluted shares
outstanding principally resulting from share repurchases;
|
|
|
|
Eight new Bistro openings and seven new Pei Wei openings.
|
22
2010
Outlook
We anticipate fiscal 2010 consolidated revenues will be flat
compared to fiscal 2009. This is based on our expectation of
slightly lower average weekly sales at both concepts during
fiscal 2010 and the impact of a 52-week fiscal year in fiscal
2010 (versus 53 weeks in fiscal 2009), offset by the
benefit of a full year of revenues for restaurants that opened
during fiscal 2009 combined with revenues from six to ten
anticipated new restaurant openings during fiscal 2010.
Despite the impact of slightly lower anticipated average weekly
sales, we expect restaurant operating margins for fiscal 2010 to
be consistent with fiscal 2009, primarily due to our expectation
of favorable cost of sales offsetting the anticipated impact of
deleverage of certain fixed operating costs and higher planned
marketing spend.
We expect to open three to five new Bistro restaurants and three
to five new Pei Wei restaurants during fiscal 2010. As a result,
we anticipate slightly lower preopening expenses for fiscal
2010. Additionally, we expect to decrease interest expense and
reduce diluted shares outstanding as a result of our planned
paydown of outstanding credit line borrowings and additional
repurchases of our common shares during fiscal 2010.
We also plan to fully repay our outstanding credit line
borrowings of $40.0 million and repurchase approximately
$40.0 million in common shares under our current
$100.0 million share repurchase authorization during fiscal
2010.
Overall, we expect consolidated diluted earnings per share from
continuing operations to approximate $2.00 for fiscal 2010.
2010
Development
Bistro
We intend to open three to five new Bistro restaurants in 2010,
primarily located in existing markets. Our Bistro restaurants
typically range in size from 6,000 to 7,500 square feet,
and require an average total cash investment of approximately
$2.5 million to $3.0 million (net of estimated tenant
incentives) and total invested capital of approximately
$3.5 million to $4.0 million per restaurant (net of
estimated tenant incentives). This total capitalized investment
includes the capitalized lease value of the property, which can
vary greatly depending on the specific trade area. See
Risk Factors Development and Construction
Risks. Preopening expenses are expected to average
approximately $350,000 to $400,000 per restaurant during fiscal
2010.
Pei
Wei
We intend to open three to five new Pei Wei restaurants in new
and existing markets. Our Pei Wei restaurants typically range in
size from 2,800 to 3,400 square feet and require an average
total cash investment of approximately $750,000 to $850,000 (net
of estimated tenant incentives) and total invested capital of
approximately $1.5 million per restaurant (net of estimated
tenant incentives). Preopening expenses are expected to average
approximately $140,000 to $160,000 per restaurant during fiscal
2010.
Operating
Statistics
There are several key financial metrics that can be useful in
evaluating and understanding our business. These metrics, which
are widely used throughout the restaurant industry, include
short-term revenue measures such as average weekly sales and
total revenues and long-term profitability measures such as
return on invested capital, each of which are described in
further detail below. We believe it is helpful to review these
measures both in total and by class year (i.e., year of
restaurant opening).
|
|
|
|
|
Average weekly sales represents an average sales amount per
restaurant and helps gauge the changes in traffic, pricing and
brand development. New restaurants are included in our average
weekly sales comparison at the start of their thirteenth month
of operation. It is not uncommon in the casual dining industry
for new restaurant locations to open with an initial honeymoon
period of higher than normal sales volumes and then experience a
drop-off in sales after initial customer trials.
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues by class year helps assess the sales performance
of our new and existing restaurants as well as the growth of
each concept as we continue our expansion strategy.
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital is a key profitability measure that
provides an indication of the long-term health of our concepts.
This metric is based on a comparison of operating profit to the
average capital invested in our restaurants. We believe return
on invested capital is a critical indicator in evaluating our
ability to create long-term value for our shareholders.
|
The following table shows total revenues and average weekly
sales for our company-owned Bistro and Pei Wei restaurants based
on the year of opening (revenues in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Average Weekly Sales
|
|
Year of Unit Opening
|
|
Units
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Bistro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-2002
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
350,057
|
|
|
|
365,577
|
|
|
|
379,013
|
|
|
|
103,201
|
|
|
|
110,213
|
|
|
|
113,886
|
|
2002
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
66,106
|
|
|
|
68,872
|
|
|
|
69,390
|
|
|
|
89,092
|
|
|
|
94,603
|
|
|
|
95,316
|
|
2003
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
91,914
|
|
|
|
95,740
|
|
|
|
98,101
|
|
|
|
96,346
|
|
|
|
102,287
|
|
|
|
104,809
|
|
2004
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
75,539
|
|
|
|
78,853
|
|
|
|
81,263
|
|
|
|
79,181
|
|
|
|
84,245
|
|
|
|
86,817
|
|
2005
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
76,653
|
|
|
|
79,875
|
|
|
|
83,259
|
|
|
|
80,349
|
|
|
|
85,337
|
|
|
|
88,953
|
|
2006
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
87,267
|
|
|
|
90,702
|
|
|
|
96,792
|
|
|
|
82,327
|
|
|
|
87,214
|
|
|
|
93,069
|
|
2007
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
91,726
|
|
|
|
98,756
|
|
|
|
41,687
|
|
|
|
86,534
|
|
|
|
94,958
|
|
|
|
108,279
|
|
2008
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
72,868
|
|
|
|
41,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,875
|
|
|
|
94,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bistro
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
925,282
|
|
|
$
|
919,744
|
|
|
$
|
849,505
|
|
|
$
|
91,161
|
|
|
$
|
98,127
|
|
|
$
|
102,486
|
|
Pei Wei(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-2002
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
10,479
|
|
|
|
10,529
|
|
|
|
11,209
|
|
|
|
39,543
|
|
|
|
40,497
|
|
|
|
43,111
|
|
2002
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
21,460
|
|
|
|
21,475
|
|
|
|
23,168
|
|
|
|
36,810
|
|
|
|
37,543
|
|
|
|
40,503
|
|
2003
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
34,342
|
|
|
|
33,982
|
|
|
|
36,021
|
|
|
|
38,115
|
|
|
|
38,440
|
|
|
|
40,748
|
|
2004
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
39,583
|
|
|
|
39,357
|
|
|
|
40,525
|
|
|
|
39,307
|
|
|
|
39,836
|
|
|
|
41,017
|
|
2005
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
43,761
|
|
|
|
42,598
|
|
|
|
43,458
|
|
|
|
35,899
|
|
|
|
35,618
|
|
|
|
36,337
|
|
2006
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
51,555
|
|
|
|
49,197
|
|
|
|
50,383
|
|
|
|
36,028
|
|
|
|
35,041
|
|
|
|
35,885
|
|
2007
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
54,179
|
|
|
|
52,792
|
|
|
|
29,673
|
|
|
|
31,945
|
|
|
|
31,726
|
|
|
|
34,909
|
|
2008
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
40,841
|
|
|
|
28,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,824
|
|
|
|
34,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Pei Wei
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
302,679
|
|
|
$
|
278,161
|
|
|
$
|
234,437
|
|
|
$
|
35,171
|
|
|
$
|
35,675
|
|
|
$
|
38,095
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects revenues and average weekly sales for Pei Wei
continuing operations only. |
Return on invested capital metrics are available on our website
at www.pfcb.com.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 1
to our consolidated financial statements. The following
discussion addresses our most critical accounting policies,
which are those that require significant judgment.
Share-Based
Compensation
We account for share-based compensation based on fair value
measurement guidance. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing
model, which requires the input of subjective assumptions, for
our options and cash-settled liability awards, with the
exception of performance units. These assumptions include
estimating 1) expected term, 2) common stock price
volatility over the expected term and 3) the number of
awards that will ultimately not vest (forfeitures).
For performance units, a Monte Carlo simulation model is used to
calculate fair value. The Monte Carlo simulation model
incorporates the historical performance, volatility and
correlation of our stock price and the Russell 2000 Index.
Additionally, we use assumptions to estimate the expected
forfeiture rate related to restricted stock in determining the
share-based compensation for these awards. Changes in these
assumptions can materially affect fair value and our estimates
of share-based compensation and consequently, the related amount
recognized in the consolidated statements of income.
24
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
We review property and equipment and intangible assets with
finite lives (those assets resulting from the acquisition of
noncontrolling interests in the operating rights of certain of
our restaurants) for impairment when events or circumstances
indicate these assets might be impaired, but at least quarterly.
An analysis is performed at the individual restaurant level and
primarily includes an assessment of historical cash flows and
other relevant facts and circumstances. For restaurants open
greater than two years, negative restaurant-level cash flows
over the previous twelve-month period is considered a potential
impairment indicator. In these situations, we evaluate future
restaurant cash flow projections in conjunction with qualitative
factors and future operating plans. Based on this assessment, we
either (a) continue to monitor these restaurants over the
near-term for evidence of improved performance or
(b) immediately recognize an impairment charge based on the
amount by which the asset carrying value exceeds fair value,
which is based on undiscounted future cash flows.
In the past, restaurants under monitoring have typically
achieved cash flow improvements in a timely fashion such that no
impairment charge was deemed necessary and the restaurant was
removed from active monitoring. However, an impairment charge
was recognized during fiscal 2008 based on our decision to close
ten underperforming Pei Wei restaurants, including several
locations that were previously being monitored for impairment.
We did not recognize any impairment charges during fiscal 2009.
Our impairment assessment process requires the use of estimates
and assumptions regarding future cash flows and operating
outcomes, which are subject to a significant degree of judgment
based on our experience and knowledge. These estimates can be
significantly impacted by changes in the economic environment,
real estate market conditions and overall operating performance.
At any given time, we are actively monitoring a small number of
restaurants and impairment charges could be triggered in the
future if individual restaurant performance does not improve or
if management decides to close that location. Also, if current
economic conditions worsen, additional restaurants could be
placed on active monitoring and potentially trigger impairment
charges in future periods.
Income
Taxes
We provide for income taxes based on our estimate of federal and
state income tax liabilities. These estimates include, among
other items, effective rates for state and local income taxes,
allowable tax credits for items such as taxes paid on reported
tip income, estimates related to depreciation and amortization
expense allowable for tax purposes, and the tax deductibility of
certain other items.
Our estimates are based on the information available to us at
the time that we prepare the income tax provision. We generally
file our annual income tax returns several months after our
fiscal year-end. Income tax returns are subject to audit by
federal, state, and local governments, generally years after the
returns are filed. These returns could be subject to material
adjustments or differing interpretations of the tax laws.
On a quarterly basis, we review and update our inventory of tax
positions as necessary to add any new uncertain positions taken,
or to remove previously identified uncertain positions that have
been adequately resolved. Additionally, uncertain positions may
be re-measured as warranted by changes in facts or law.
Accounting for uncertain tax positions requires significant
judgments, including estimating the amount, timing and
likelihood of ultimate settlement. Although we believe that
these estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ from
these estimates.
Lease
Obligations
We lease all of our restaurant properties. At the inception of
the lease, each property is evaluated to determine whether the
lease will be accounted for as an operating or capital lease.
The term of the lease used for this evaluation includes renewal
option periods only in instances in which the exercise of the
renewal option can be reasonably assured and failure to exercise
such option would result in an economic penalty.
There is potential for variability in the rent holiday period,
which begins on the possession date and ends on the store open
date, during which no cash rent payments are typically due under
the terms of the lease. Factors that may affect the length of
the rent holiday period generally relate to construction related
delays. Extension of the rent holiday period due to delays in
store opening will result in greater preopening rent expense
recognized during the rent holiday period and lower occupancy
expense during the rest of the lease term (post-opening).
25
For leases that contain rent escalations, we record the total
rent payable during the lease term, as determined above, on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease (including the
rent holiday period beginning upon our possession of the
premises), and record the difference between the minimum rent
paid and the straight-line rent as a lease obligation. Many of
our leases contain provisions that require additional rental
payments based upon restaurant sales volume (contingent
rent). Contingent rent is accrued each period as the
liability is incurred, in addition to the straight-line rent
expense noted above. This results in variability in occupancy
expense as a percentage of revenues over the term of the lease
in restaurants where we pay contingent rent.
Management makes judgments regarding the probable term for each
restaurant property lease, which can impact the classification
and accounting for a lease as capital or operating, the rent
holiday
and/or
escalations in payments that are taken into consideration when
calculating straight-line rent and the term over which tenant
incentives received from landlords in connection with certain
operating leases for each restaurant are amortized. These
judgments may produce materially different amounts of
depreciation, amortization and rent expense than would be
reported if different assumed lease terms were used.
Self
Insurance
We are self-insured for a significant portion of our current and
prior years exposures related to our workers
compensation, general liability, medical and dental programs. We
have paid to our insurance carrier amounts that approximate the
cost of claims known to date and we have accrued additional
liabilities for our estimate of ultimate costs related to those
claims. We develop these estimates using historical experience
factors to estimate the ultimate claim exposure. Our
self-insurance liabilities are actuarially determined and
consider estimates of expected losses, based on statistical
analyses of our actual historical trends as well as historical
industry data. If actual claims experience differs from our
assumptions and estimates, changes in our insurance reserves
would impact the expense recorded in our consolidated income
statements.
Partnership
Structure
We utilize a partnership philosophy to facilitate the
development, leadership and operation of our restaurants.
Historically, this philosophy was embodied in a traditional
legal partnership structure, which included capital
contributions from our partners in exchange for an ownership
stake in the profits and losses of our restaurants. Under this
legal partnership program, each partner who wished to
participate in our legal partnership structure, to the extent
applicable, was required to make a cash capital contribution in
exchange for a specified interest in the partnership. The
ownership interest purchased by each partner generally ranged
between two and ten percent of the restaurant or region the
partner oversees. Generally, no more than ten percent of an
individual restaurant was owned in total by noncontrolling
partners. We performed an assessment of what the imputed fair
value of these interests might be for a passive equity investor
(i.e. not someone actually working in the restaurant), utilizing
a discounted cash flow model and updated assumptions based on
the results of an annual valuation analysis. This methodology
involved the use of various estimates relating to future cash
flow projections and discount rates for which significant
judgments were required. We recognized any excess of the imputed
fair value of these interests, determined by using the
discounted cash flow model, over the cash contribution paid by
our partners as partner investment expense upon purchase by the
partner of the respective interest.
At the end of a specific term (generally five years), we have
the right, but not the obligation, to purchase the
noncontrolling interest in the partners respective
restaurant or region at fair value. The estimated fair value of
the noncontrolling interest is determined by reference to
current industry purchase metrics as well as the historical cash
flows or net income of the subject restaurant or region. We have
the option to pay the agreed upon purchase price in cash over a
period of time not to exceed five years. Given that there is no
public market for these interests, the fair value determinations
are subjective and require the use of various estimates for
which significant judgments are required. Prior to fiscal year
2009, any excess of the purchase price over the imputed fair
value was recorded as an intangible asset and amortized over
approximately 15 years for our Bistro restaurants and
approximately 10 years for our Pei Wei restaurants.
Beginning in fiscal year 2009 upon the adoption of new
accounting guidance, an intangible asset is no longer recognized
upon buyout of noncontrolling interests. Instead, any excess of
the purchase price over the imputed fair value is recognized as
a reduction to additional-paid-in-capital in equity. See
Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for further
discussion.
26
Effective January 2007 for new store openings, the Bistro began
employing a different partnership structure to achieve the same
goal. At the restaurant level, our Operating and Culinary
Partners at stores opened on or after January 1, 2007
(still partners in the philosophical, but not legal
sense) no longer have a direct ownership stake in the profits
and losses of a restaurant, but are instead eligible to receive
monthly incentive payments based upon the profitability of the
restaurant, as well as to participate in an incentive program
that rewards improvements in the operating performance of the
restaurant. As a result of these changes, incentive payments
made to the individuals participating in the new plan are
classified as compensation expense rather than as net income
attributable to noncontrolling interests. Accordingly,
compensation expense for these Operating and Culinary Partners
is reflected in the consolidated income statement as labor
expense. Additionally, a similar structure exists for our Market
Partners, Market Chefs and Regional Vice Presidents, with
related compensation expense reflected as general and
administrative expense in the consolidated income statement. As
a result of this change, since the beginning of 2007, we have no
longer recognized partner investment expense for new Bistro
restaurant openings. Additionally, many existing legal partners
requested an early buyout of their partnership interests during
2007 and 2008 as a result of their desire to participate in the
new plan, the financial impact of which is discussed under
Partner Investment Expense in Results of Operations.
The Pei Wei partnership structure was not affected by the
changes at the Bistro and the traditional partnership structure
remains in effect for new Pei Wei restaurant openings.
Results
of Operations
We operate on a 52/53-week year, with the fiscal year ending on
the Sunday closest to December 31. Fiscal year 2009 was
comprised of 53 weeks and fiscal years 2008 and 2007 were
each comprised of 52 weeks.
Fiscal
2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
Our consolidated operating results for the fiscal years ended
January 3, 2010 (fiscal 2009) and December 28,
2008 (fiscal 2008) were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% of Revenues
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% of Revenues
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,228,179
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,198,124
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
30,055
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
326,421
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
%
|
|
|
325,630
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Labor
|
|
|
401,583
|
|
|
|
32.7
|
%
|
|
|
396,911
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
%
|
|
|
4,672
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Operating
|
|
|
203,859
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
198,967
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
4,892
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
70,635
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
69,809
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
82,749
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
77,488
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
5,261
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
74,429
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
68,711
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
5,718
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
Preopening expense
|
|
|
3,919
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
(4,538
|
)
|
|
|
(53.7
|
)%
|
Partner investment expense
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
77.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,162,966
|
|
|
|
94.7
|
%
|
|
|
1,145,619
|
|
|
|
95.6
|
%
|
|
|
17,347
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
65,213
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
52,505
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
12,708
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(1,637
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(3,362
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
(51.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes
|
|
|
63,576
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
49,143
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
14,433
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(18,492
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(12,193
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(6,299
|
)
|
|
|
51.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
|
45,084
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
36,950
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
8,134
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(7,591
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
7,112
|
|
|
|
(93.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
44,605
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
29,359
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
15,246
|
|
|
|
51.9
|
%
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
(27.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to PFCB
|
|
$
|
43,197
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
27,426
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
15,771
|
|
|
|
57.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Certain percentage amounts may not sum due to rounding.
Selected operating statistics for the Bistro were as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
925,321
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
919,963
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,358
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
244,816
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
%
|
|
|
249,911
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
(5,095
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
Labor
|
|
|
300,775
|
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
301,967
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
|
|
(1,192
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
Operating
|
|
|
150,883
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
149,083
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
50,186
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
50,670
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
54,521
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
51,091
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
3,430
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Preopening expense
|
|
|
2,835
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
5,677
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
(2,842
|
)
|
|
|
(50.1
|
)%
|
Partner investment expense
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(1,066
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
(77.9
|
)%
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
(823
|
)
|
|
|
(60.5
|
)%
|
Selected operating statistics for Pei Wei were as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
302,724
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
278,161
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
24,563
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
81,605
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
%
|
|
|
75,719
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
5,886
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
Labor
|
|
|
100,808
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
%
|
|
|
94,944
|
|
|
|
34.1
|
%
|
|
|
5,864
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
Operating
|
|
|
52,976
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
|
|
49,884
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
3,092
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
20,449
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
19,139
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
18,103
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
16,158
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
Preopening expense
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
2,780
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
(1,696
|
)
|
|
|
(61.0
|
)%
|
Partner investment expense
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
(1,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
%
|
Percentages over 100% are not displayed.
Revenues
Our revenues are derived primarily from food and beverage sales.
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: The increase in revenues was
attributable to incremental new store revenues of
$44.7 million, comprised of a full year of revenues from
the 17 new stores that opened during 2008 and revenues generated
by the eight new Bistro restaurants that opened during 2009. The
increase was partially offset by a $39.1 million decline in
revenues for stores that opened prior to 2008, due to a
significant reduction in overall guest traffic combined with a
slight decline in the average check. Fiscal year 2009 also
includes the benefit from one extra week of revenues compared to
fiscal year 2008.
Pei Wei: The increase in revenues was
attributable to incremental new store revenues of
$19.1 million, comprised of a full year of revenues from
the 25 new stores that opened during 2008 and revenues generated
by the seven new Pei Wei restaurants that opened during 2009.
The remainder of the increase was due to a $5.4 million
increase in revenues for stores that opened prior to 2008, as
well as a slight increase in overall guest traffic partially
offset by a slight decline in the average check. Fiscal year
2009 also includes the benefit from one extra week of revenues
compared to fiscal year 2008.
28
Costs and
Expenses
Cost of
Sales
Cost of sales is comprised of the cost of food and beverages.
Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues decreased at both
Bistro and Pei Wei due to the net impact of favorable product
mix shifts, operational efficiencies, and favorable produce
pricing. These declines were partially offset by higher wok oil
costs. We negotiate annual pricing agreements for many of our
key commodities and such contracts provided for favorable
produce costs, consistent beef and seafood costs, and
unfavorable poultry costs for fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal
2008.
Labor
Labor expenses consist of restaurant management salaries, hourly
staff payroll costs, other payroll-related items and imputed
partner bonus expense. Imputed partner bonus expense represents
the portion of restaurant level operating results that is
allocable to certain noncontrolling partners, but is presented
as bonus expense for accounting purposes. Each segment
contributed as follows:
Bistro: Labor expenses as a percentage of
revenues decreased primarily due to improved labor efficiencies
in culinary and hospitality positions and, to a lesser extent,
the benefit of reduced workers compensation insurance
liabilities resulting from lower than anticipated claim
development. These declines were partially offset by the impact
of decreased leverage on lower average weekly sales on the
portion of labor expenses that is fixed in nature and, to a
lesser extent, higher management incentive and health insurance
costs.
Pei Wei: Labor expenses as a percentage of
revenues decreased primarily due to improved labor efficiencies
in culinary and hospitality positions, lower manager salaries
resulting from reduced management headcount, and the benefit of
reduced workers compensation insurance liabilities
resulting from lower than anticipated claim development. These
declines were partially offset by higher expenses associated
with the utilization of additional key hourly employees as well
as the impact of decreased leverage on lower average weekly
sales on the portion of labor expenses that is fixed in nature
and, to a lesser extent, higher management incentive accruals.
Operating
Operating expenses consist primarily of various restaurant-level
costs such as repairs and maintenance, utilities and marketing,
certain of which are variable and may fluctuate with revenues.
Our experience to date has been that operating costs during the
first four to nine months of a newly opened restaurant are
materially greater than what can be expected after that time,
both in aggregate dollars and as a percentage of revenues. Also,
expenditures associated with marketing expenses are
discretionary in nature and the timing and amount of marketing
spend will vary. Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Operating expenses as a percentage of
revenues increased primarily due to the impact of decreased
leverage on lower average weekly sales on the portion of
operating costs that is fixed in nature, higher repairs and
maintenance expense and higher menu printing costs. These
increases were partially offset by lower utilities costs
resulting from favorable rates and lower usage.
Pei Wei: Operating expenses as a percentage of
revenues decreased primarily due to lower utilities costs
resulting from favorable rates, lower menu printing costs and
the impact of increased leverage resulting from an extra week of
revenues in fiscal 2009 on the portion of operating costs that
is fixed in nature. These decreases were partially offset by
higher repairs and maintenance costs and, to a lesser extent,
increased marketing spend.
Occupancy
Occupancy costs include both fixed and variable portions of
rent, common area maintenance charges, property and general
liability insurance and property taxes. Each segment contributed
as follows:
Bistro: Occupancy costs as a percentage of
revenues decreased from prior year primarily due to lower
contingent rent expense resulting from lower sales, the impact
of increased leverage resulting from an extra
29
week of revenues in fiscal 2009 and, to a lesser extent,
decreased general liability insurance. These decreases were
partially offset by the impact of decreased leverage on lower
average weekly sales.
Pei Wei: Occupancy costs as a percentage of
revenues decreased from prior year primarily due to the impact
of increased leverage resulting from an extra week of revenues
in fiscal 2009 and lower property tax expense partially offset
by the impact of decreased leverage on lower average weekly
sales.
General
and Administrative
General and administrative expenses are comprised of costs
associated with corporate and administrative functions that
support restaurant development and operations and provide
infrastructure to support future growth including, but not
limited to, management and staff compensation, employee
benefits, travel, legal and professional fees, technology and
market research.
Consolidated general and administrative costs increased
primarily due to higher management incentive accruals, higher
share-based compensation expense, principally resulting from the
performance unit award grants issued to our co-CEOs during the
first quarter of 2009 and the cash-settled liability awards
issued during fiscal 2009, as well as additional compensation
expense resulting from unrealized holding gains associated with
investments in the 401(k) Restoration Plan. These increases were
partially offset by lower management salaries due to decreased
headcount and a reduction in other administrative support costs.
Fiscal 2008 also includes $2.0 million of cash and non-cash
charges related to a separation agreement with the former Pei
Wei president which included a severance payment, accelerated
vesting of unvested options and the extension of the expiration
date of all outstanding stock options.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses include the depreciation
of fixed assets, gains and losses on disposal of assets and the
amortization of intangible assets, software and non-transferable
liquor license fees.
Depreciation and amortization increased at both Bistro and Pei
Wei primarily due to additional depreciation on restaurants that
opened during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008. As a percentage of
revenues, depreciation and amortization increased at both Bistro
and Pei Wei primarily due to the impact of decreased leverage
resulting from lower average weekly sales, partially offset by
the impact of increased leverage resulting from an extra week of
revenues in fiscal 2009.
Preopening
Expense
Preopening expenses, which are expensed as incurred, consist of
expenses incurred prior to opening a new restaurant and are
comprised principally of manager salaries, employee payroll and
related training costs. Preopening expenses also include
straight-line rent expense for the period between the possession
date of leased premises and the restaurant opening date. Each
segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Preopening expense decreased primarily
due to the impact of opening eight new restaurants during fiscal
2009 compared to opening 17 new restaurants during fiscal 2008.
Pei Wei: Preopening expense decreased
primarily due to the impact of opening seven new restaurants
during fiscal 2009 compared to opening 25 new restaurants during
fiscal 2008.
Partner
Investment Expense
Partner investment expense represents the difference between the
imputed fair value of noncontrolling interests at the time our
partners invested in our restaurants and our partners cash
contributions for those ownership interests. Additionally, for
those interests that are bought out prior to the restaurant
reaching maturity (typically after five years of operation),
partner investment expense includes a reversal of previously
recognized expense for
30
the difference between the fair value of the noncontrolling
interest at inception date and the fair value at the date of
repurchase, to the extent that the former is greater. Each
segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: All partner investment expense
activity for the Bistro is related to early buyouts of
noncontrolling interests. The change in partner investment
expense resulted from fewer early buyouts of noncontrolling
interests during fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008.
Pei Wei: Partner investment expense decreased
primarily due to the impact of opening fewer new restaurants
during fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008.
Interest
and Other Income (Expense), Net
Interest expense primarily consists of interest costs in excess
of amounts capitalized related to our outstanding credit line
and other borrowings, as well as accretion expense related to
our conditional asset retirement obligations. Interest income
earned primarily relates to interest-bearing overnight deposits.
Realized and unrealized holding gains (losses) related to
investments in the 401(k) Restoration Plan are included within
other income (expense), with a corresponding offset in general
and administrative expense.
The change in consolidated interest and other income (expense),
net was primarily due to lower interest expense resulting from
the repayment of $40.0 million of our outstanding credit
line borrowings in fiscal 2009. Additionally, unrealized holding
gains during the current year compared to unrealized holding
losses in the prior year associated with investments in the
401(k) Restoration Plan, lower capitalized interest and lower
interest income contributed to the change. We expect to continue
to recognize net interest expense until such time as we further
lower our outstanding debt levels or increase our development.
Provision
for Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate from continuing operations, including
discrete items and deduction for noncontrolling interests, was
29.7% for fiscal 2009 compared to 25.8% for fiscal 2008. Prior
fiscal year includes the impact of a change in estimate related
to amended tax returns. Additionally, fiscal year
2009 state tax expense increased from fiscal year 2008.
This is due to an increase in state tax filings, impacts of
state tax reform measures and changes in filing methodology as a
result of audits. The income tax rate for both fiscal 2009 and
fiscal 2008 differed from the expected provision for income
taxes, which is derived by applying the statutory income tax
rate, primarily as a result of FICA tip credits. In fiscal year
2009, income from continuing operations increased at a greater
rate than FICA tip credits generated as compared to fiscal year
2008. Because there are no tipped employees at Pei Wei, as Pei
Wei contributes more net income, and if Bistros income
from operations grows at a rate greater than revenue growth, the
impact of Bistros tip credit on the companys
effective tax rate will continue to decrease.
Management has evaluated all positive and negative evidence
concerning the realizability of deferred tax assets and has
determined that, with the exception of a small amount of state
net operating losses, we will recognize sufficient future
taxable income to realize the benefit of our deferred tax assets.
Loss
from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
The results of Taneko and 10 closed Pei Wei restaurants are
classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
During fiscal 2009, we recognized pretax charges of
$1.4 million related to estimated and actual lease
termination costs. See Fiscal 2008 compared to Fiscal 2007
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax section for
further discussion.
Net
Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represents
the portion of our net income which is attributable to the
collective ownership interests of our noncontrolling partners.
In certain of our restaurants, we employ a partnership
management structure whereby we have entered into a series of
partnership agreements
31
with our regional managers, certain of our general managers, and
certain of our executive chefs. Each segment contributed as
follows:
Bistro: The change in net income attributable
to noncontrolling interests was primarily due to the full year
impact of noncontrolling interest buyouts that occurred during
fiscal 2008 and, to a lesser, extent, the impact of
noncontrolling interest buyouts occurring during fiscal 2009.
These buyouts reduced the number of noncontrolling interests
from 133 at the beginning of fiscal 2008 to 20 as of
January 3, 2010.
Pei Wei: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests as a percentage of revenues increased
from the prior year primarily due to the impact of higher
restaurant net income and, to a lesser extent, a cumulative
adjustment of prior period expense, partially offset by the
impact of 132 noncontrolling interest buyouts occurring since
the beginning of fiscal 2008.
Fiscal
2008 compared to Fiscal 2007
Our consolidated operating results for the fiscal years ended
December 28, 2008 (fiscal 2008) and December 30,
2007 (fiscal 2007) were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,198,124
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,084,193
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
113,931
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
325,630
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
297,242
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
%
|
|
|
28,388
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
Labor
|
|
|
396,911
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
%
|
|
|
364,074
|
|
|
|
33.6
|
%
|
|
|
32,837
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
Operating
|
|
|
198,967
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
172,147
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|
|
26,820
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
69,809
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
62,164
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
7,645
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
77,488
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
66,968
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
10,520
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
68,711
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
|
55,988
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
12,723
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
Preopening expense
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
14,310
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
(5,853
|
)
|
|
|
(40.9
|
)%
|
Partner investment expense
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(2,012
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
|
(82.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,145,619
|
|
|
|
95.6
|
%
|
|
|
1,030,881
|
|
|
|
95.1
|
%
|
|
|
114,738
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
52,505
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
53,312
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(3,362
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(3,262
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes
|
|
|
49,143
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
53,212
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
(4,069
|
)
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(12,193
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(12,420
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
|
36,950
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
40,792
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
(3,842
|
)
|
|
|
(9.4
|
)%
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(7,591
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(4,560
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(3,031
|
)
|
|
|
66.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
29,359
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
36,232
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
(6,873
|
)
|
|
|
(19.0
|
)%
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
4,169
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
(2,236
|
)
|
|
|
(53.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to PFCB
|
|
$
|
27,426
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
32,063
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(4,637
|
)
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain percentage amounts do not sum to total due to rounding.
Percentages over 100% not displayed.
32
Selected operating statistics for the Bistro were as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
919,963
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
849,743
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
70,220
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
249,911
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
232,578
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
%
|
|
|
17,333
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
Labor
|
|
|
301,967
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
|
|
282,919
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
%
|
|
|
19,048
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Operating
|
|
|
149,083
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
131,863
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
17,220
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
50,670
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
47,059
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
3,611
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
51,091
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
42,294
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
8,797
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
%
|
Preopening expense
|
|
|
5,677
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
9,012
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
(3,335
|
)
|
|
|
(37.0
|
)%
|
Partner investment expense
|
|
|
(1,066
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(3,358
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
2,292
|
|
|
|
(68.3
|
)%
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
3,351
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
(1,990
|
)
|
|
|
(59.4
|
)%
|
Selected operating statistics for Pei Wei were as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
278,161
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
234,450
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
43,711
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
%
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
75,719
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
64,664
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
|
|
11,055
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
Labor
|
|
|
94,944
|
|
|
|
34.1
|
%
|
|
|
81,155
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
%
|
|
|
13,789
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
Operating
|
|
|
49,884
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
40,284
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
|
9,600
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
19,139
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
15,105
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
4,034
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,158
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
12,278
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
3,880
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
%
|
Preopening expense
|
|
|
2,780
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
5,298
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
(2,518
|
)
|
|
|
(47.5
|
)%
|
Partner investment expense
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
(47.1
|
)%
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
818
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
(30.1
|
)%
|
Revenues
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: The increase in revenues was
attributable to revenues of $98.4 million generated by 17
new Bistro restaurants that opened during 2008 combined with a
full year of revenues for the 20 new stores that opened during
2007. Revenues for stores that opened prior to 2007 declined by
$28.2 million as a significant reduction in overall guest
traffic more than offset the benefit of a three to four percent
average check increase, reflecting the net benefit of price and
menu mix changes.
Pei Wei: The increase in revenues was
attributable to revenues of $51.3 million generated by 25
new Pei Wei restaurants that opened during 2008 combined with a
full year of revenues for the 32 new stores that opened during
2007. Revenues for stores that opened prior to 2007 decreased by
$7.6 million primarily due to a significant reduction in
overall guest traffic partially offset by the benefit of a
slightly higher average check, reflecting the net benefit of
price and menu mix changes.
33
Costs and
Expenses
Cost of
Sales
Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues decreased at both
Bistro and Pei Wei due to the net impact of favorable product
mix shifts. We negotiate annual pricing agreements for many of
our key commodities and such contracts provided for favorable
seafood and produce costs, unfavorable poultry and wok oil
costs, and consistent beef costs during fiscal 2008 compared to
fiscal 2007.
Labor
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Labor expenses as a percentage of
revenues decreased primarily due to improved efficiency
primarily in culinary as well as hospitality positions. The
decrease was partially offset by the benefit of reduced
workers compensation insurance liabilities recorded in
2007 resulting from lower than anticipated claim development
from prior claim years, higher management incentive costs
principally resulting from the full year impact of the 2007
change in the Bistro partnership structure and the impact of
decreased leverage on lower average weekly sales on the portion
of labor expenses that is fixed in nature.
Pei Wei: Labor expenses as a percentage of
revenues decreased primarily due to improved labor efficiency in
culinary and hospitality positions as well as lower manager
salaries resulting from reduced management headcount. The
benefit of opening fewer new stores on a larger base of existing
stores during fiscal 2008 also contributed to the decrease. The
decrease was partially offset by costs associated with the
utilization of additional key hourly employees, the benefit of
reduced workers compensation insurance liabilities
recorded in 2007 resulting from lower than anticipated claim
development from prior claim years and the impact of decreased
leverage on lower average weekly sales on the portion of labor
expenses that is fixed in nature.
Operating
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Operating expenses as a percentage of
revenues increased primarily due to increased marketing spend,
the impact of decreased leverage on lower average weekly sales
on the portion of operating costs that is fixed in nature and
higher utility costs.
Pei Wei: Operating expenses as a percentage of
revenues increased primarily due to the impact of decreased
leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales on the
portion of operating costs that is fixed in nature as well as
increased marketing spend, higher utility costs, and higher menu
printing costs related to new menu rollouts.
Occupancy
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Occupancy costs as a percentage of
revenues remained consistent primarily due to lower contingent
rent expense offset by the impact of decreased leverage on lower
average weekly sales.
Pei Wei: Occupancy costs as a percentage of
revenues increased primarily due to the impact of decreased
leverage on lower average weekly sales.
General
and Administrative
Consolidated general and administrative costs increased
primarily due to higher management incentive accruals resulting
from the accrual of a corporate bonus for fiscal 2008 compared
to the absence of such an accrual in fiscal 2007 as well as
higher compensation and benefits expense primarily related to
the addition of corporate management personnel and increased
health insurance costs. These increases were
34
partially offset by lower share-based compensation expense.
Fiscal 2008 also includes $2.0 million of cash and non-cash
charges related to a separation agreement with the former Pei
Wei president which included a severance payment, accelerated
vesting of unvested options and the extension of the expiration
date of all outstanding stock options.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Depreciation and amortization
increased primarily due to depreciation on restaurants that
opened during fiscal 2008 as well as a full year of depreciation
on restaurants that opened during fiscal 2007. As a percentage
of revenues, depreciation and amortization increased primarily
due to the impact of decreased leverage resulting from lower
average weekly sales.
Pei Wei: Depreciation and amortization
increased primarily due to depreciation on restaurants that
opened during fiscal 2008 as well as a full year of depreciation
on restaurants that opened during fiscal 2007. As a percentage
of revenues, depreciation and amortization increased primarily
due to the impact of decreased leverage resulting from lower
average weekly sales.
Preopening
Expense
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Preopening expense decreased primarily
due to the impact of opening 17 new restaurants during fiscal
2008 compared to opening 20 new restaurants during fiscal 2007
in addition to a lower number of scheduled new restaurant
openings in early fiscal 2009 compared to early fiscal 2008.
Pei Wei: Preopening expense decreased
primarily due to the timing of expenses related to restaurants
that opened during the first quarter of 2008, which resulted in
a greater portion of preopening expenses related to fiscal 2008
openings being recognized during fiscal 2007. Also contributing
to the decrease was the impact of opening 25 new restaurants
during fiscal 2008 compared to opening 32 new restaurants during
fiscal 2007 as well as a lower number of scheduled new
restaurant openings in early fiscal 2009 compared to early
fiscal 2008.
Partner
Investment Expense
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: The change in partner investment
expense resulted primarily from changes in the partnership
structure beginning in 2007 which led to a significant increase
in early buyouts of noncontrolling interests beginning in fiscal
2007. Early buyouts resulted in a $1.1 million reversal of
previously recognized partner investment expense during fiscal
2008 as compared to a $3.4 million reversal during fiscal
2007, in each case due to the fair value of the noncontrolling
interests at inception date exceeding the fair value of the
noncontrolling interests at repurchase date.
Pei Wei: Partner investment expense decreased
primarily due to the impact of opening fewer new restaurants
during fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007.
Interest
and Other Income (Expense), Net
Consolidated interest and other income (expense), net increased
primarily due to higher interest expense in 2008 resulting from
interest incurred on a higher average level of outstanding
credit line borrowings throughout 2008, a portion of which
exceeded our limit for capitalization during 2008. We expect to
continue to recognize net interest expense until such time as we
lower our outstanding debt levels or increase our development.
35
Provision
for Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate from continuing operations was 25.8% for
fiscal 2008 compared to 25.3% for fiscal 2007. The increase from
the prior year was primarily attributable to state taxes, and,
to a lesser extent, the impact of a change in estimate related
to amended tax returns. Besides the effect of state taxes and
the change in estimate related to the amended returns, the
income tax rate for both fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 differed
from the expected provision for income taxes, which is derived
by applying the statutory income tax rate, primarily as a result
of FICA tip credits.
Management has evaluated all positive and negative evidence
concerning the realizability of deferred tax assets and has
determined that, with the exception of a small amount of state
net operating losses, we will recognize sufficient future
taxable income to realize the benefit of our deferred tax assets.
Loss
from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
As part of ongoing profitability initiatives, we closed 10
underperforming Pei Wei restaurants during the fourth quarter of
2008. This decision, which was reached during the third quarter
of 2008, was the result of a rigorous evaluation of our entire
store portfolio. We reviewed each locations past and
present operating performance combined with projected future
results. The locations selected for closure represent
restaurants with lower profitability that were not projected to
provide acceptable returns in the foreseeable future.
During the second half of 2008, we recognized non-cash asset
impairment charges of $7.5 million ($4.6 million net
of tax) related to the write-off of the carrying value of
long-lived assets associated with the 10 Pei Wei store closures.
We also recognized additional pretax charges of
$2.6 million related to estimated and actual lease
termination costs and $0.1 million related to severance
payments made in connection with the store closures. These
charges as well as all historical operations related to the
closed stores are reflected within discontinued operations in
the consolidated financial statements for all years presented as
further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements.
Additionally, as a result of the expected sale of Tanekos
long-lived assets, Taneko was classified as a discontinued
operation as of December 30, 2007. We recognized a
$3.1 million ($2.1 million net of tax) asset
impairment charge which was included within discontinued
operations during 2007. All revenues, costs and expenses and
income taxes attributable to Taneko are reflected within
discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements
for all periods presented.
Net
Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Each segment contributed as follows:
Bistro: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests as a percentage of revenues at the
Bistro decreased due to the impact of noncontrolling interest
buyouts occurring during fiscal 2008 and the full year impact of
noncontrolling interest buyouts that occurred during fiscal
2007. During fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, 92 interests and 203
interests were purchased, respectively, which reduced the number
of noncontrolling interests to 40 interests at the end of fiscal
2008.
Pei Wei: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests as a percentage of revenues decreased
slightly primarily due to the impact of noncontrolling interest
buyouts occurring during fiscal 2007 and 2008.
36
Quarterly
Results
The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly
information for the eight fiscal quarters in the two-year period
ended January 3, 2010, expressed as a percentage of
revenues, except for revenues which are expressed in thousands.
This quarterly information has been prepared on a basis
consistent with the audited financial statements and, in the
opinion of management, includes all adjustments, consisting only
of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of the information for the periods presented. Our
quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly as a
result of a variety of factors, and operating results for any
quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for a full
fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Revenues, in thousands
|
|
$
|
309,837
|
|
|
$
|
301,360
|
|
|
$
|
290,329
|
|
|
$
|
326,653
|
|
|
$
|
305,917
|
|
|
$
|
301,533
|
|
|
$
|
295,877
|
|
|
$
|
294,797
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
26.8
|
%
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
|
|
26.7
|
%
|
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
27.0
|
%
|
Labor
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
33.8
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
32.4
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
Preopening expense
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Partner investment expense
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
93.7
|
|
|
|
94.1
|
|
|
|
97.0
|
|
|
|
94.2
|
|
|
|
95.0
|
|
|
|
95.0
|
|
|
|
96.3
|
|
|
|
96.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to PFCB
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain percentage amounts may not sum to total due to rounding.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash provided by operations
and borrowings under our credit facility. Historically, our need
for capital resources has been driven by our construction of new
restaurants. More recently, our need for capital resources has
also been driven by repayments of long-term debt, repurchases of
our common stock, and purchases of noncontrolling interests.
37
The following table presents a summary of our cash flows for
fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
160,419
|
|
|
$
|
139,753
|
|
|
$
|
137,920
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(50,118
|
)
|
|
|
(87,886
|
)
|
|
|
(153,344
|
)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(87,753
|
)
|
|
|
(34,971
|
)
|
|
|
7,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
22,548
|
|
|
$
|
16,896
|
|
|
$
|
(7,534
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities
Our funding requirements since inception have been met through
sales of equity securities, debt financing and cash flows from
operations. Net cash provided by operating activities exceeded
net income for the periods shown due principally to the effect
of depreciation and amortization, a net increase in operating
liabilities and share-based compensation expense as well as
non-cash asset impairment and lease termination charges.
Investing
Activities
We have historically used cash primarily to fund the development
and construction of new restaurants. Investment activities
primarily related to capital expenditures of $49.9 million,
$87.2 million, and $151.6 million in fiscal years
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Capital expenditures were
relatively higher during fiscal 2008 and relatively lower during
fiscal 2009 due to the number of new restaurant openings in each
year (15 new restaurants during fiscal 2009 compared to 42 new
restaurants during fiscal 2008). Also included is capitalized
interest of $0.3 million, $0.7 million, and
$1.8 million in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
We intend to open three to five new Bistro restaurants and three
to five new Pei Wei restaurants in fiscal year 2010. We expect
that our planned future Bistro restaurants will require, on
average, a total cash investment per restaurant of approximately
$2.5 million to $3.0 million(net of estimated tenant
incentives). We expect to spend approximately $350,000 to
$400,000 per restaurant for preopening costs. Total cash
investment per each Pei Wei restaurant is expected to average
$750,000 to $850,000 (net of estimated tenant incentives) and we
expect to spend approximately $140,000 to $160,000 per
restaurant for preopening costs. The anticipated total cash
investment per restaurant is based on recent historical averages
which have increased over prior years due to increases in
construction related costs of steel, aluminum and lumber. We
expect total gross capital expenditures for fiscal 2010 to
approximate $30.0 million to $40.0 million
($25.0 million to $35.0 million, net of tenant
incentives).
Financing
Activities
Financing activities during fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007 included
debt repayments of $45.9 million, $12.5 million, and
$30.5 million, respectively, and repurchases of common
stock of $39.7 million, $10.0 million, and
$50.0 million, respectively. Financing activities also
included purchases of noncontrolling interests, proceeds from
stock options exercised and employee stock purchases,
distributions to noncontrolling interest partners, and the tax
benefit (shortfall) from share-based compensation, net. Fiscal
2007 also included $96.0 million of credit line borrowings.
Future
Capital Requirements
Our capital requirements, including development costs related to
the opening of additional restaurants, have historically been
significant. Our future capital requirements and the adequacy of
our available funds will depend on many factors, including the
operating performance of our restaurants, the pace of expansion,
real estate markets, site locations, the nature of the
arrangements negotiated with landlords and any potential
repurchases of our common stock.
For fiscal 2010, we believe that our cash flow from operations
will significantly exceed our projected capital requirements. As
a result, we plan to continue evaluating other uses of capital,
including, but not limited to, debt repayment, repurchases of
our common stock and cash dividends.
38
In the longer term, in the unlikely event that additional
capital is required, we may seek to raise such capital through
public or private equity or debt financing. Future capital
funding transactions may result in dilution to current
shareholders. We cannot ensure that such capital will be
available on favorable terms, if at all.
Credit
Facility
On August 31, 2007, we entered into a senior credit
facility (Credit Facility) with several commercial
financial institutions, which allowed for borrowings of up to
$150.0 million. On December 15, 2009, we amended the
Credit Facility which reduced the borrowings allowed to
$75.0 million and modified certain restrictive language
regarding restricted payments such as dividends and share
repurchases. The Credit Facility is guaranteed by our material
existing and future domestic subsidiaries. The Credit Facility
expires on August 30, 2013 and contains customary
representations, warranties, and negative and affirmative
covenants, including a requirement to maintain a maximum
leverage ratio, as defined, of 2.5:1 and a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio, as defined, of 1.25:1, as well as customary
events of default and certain default provisions that could
result in acceleration of the Credit Facility. We were in
compliance with these restrictions and conditions as of
January 3, 2010 as our leverage ratio was 1.23:1 and the
fixed charge coverage ratio was 2.19:1.
As of January 3, 2010, we had borrowings outstanding under
the Credit Facility totaling $40.0 million as well as
$11.2 million committed for the issuance of letters of
credit, which is required by insurance companies for our
workers compensation and general liability insurance
programs. We intend to fully repay the outstanding borrowings of
$40.0 million under the Credit Facility during fiscal 2010.
Available borrowings under the Credit Facility were
$23.8 million at January 3, 2010. See Item 7A
below for a discussion of interest rates and our interest rate
swap.
Share
Repurchase Program
Under share repurchase programs authorized by our Board of
Directors, we have repurchased a total of 5.1 million
shares of our common stock for $146.0 million at an average
price of $28.83 since July 2006. Included in this total are
1.4 million shares of our common stock repurchased during
2009 for $39.7 million at an average price of $27.73. The
remaining $0.4 million available under the Companys
previous share repurchase program expired in December 2009.
In December 2009, our Board of Directors authorized a new share
repurchase program to repurchase up to $100.0 million of
our outstanding shares of common stock from time to time in the
open market or in private transactions at prevailing market
prices over the next two years. We intend to use cash on hand to
repurchase shares. We did not repurchase any shares under this
authorization during fiscal 2009. We plan to repurchase
approximately $40.0 million of our outstanding shares of
common stock under the $100.0 million repurchase
authorization during fiscal 2010.
Cash
Dividends
Based on our desire to consistently return excess cash flow to
our shareholders, the Board of Directors has approved the
initiation of a quarterly variable cash dividend. The amount of
the cash dividend will be computed based on 45% of our quarterly
net income and is expected to total approximately $0.90 per
share during fiscal 2010.
Partnership
Activities
As of January 3, 2010, there were 40 partners within our
partnership system representing 141 partnership interests.
During fiscal 2009, we had the opportunity to purchase 18
noncontrolling interests which had reached the five-year
threshold period during the year, as well as 79 additional
noncontrolling interests which (i) had reached the end of
their initial five-year term in prior years (ii) related to
partners who left the Company prior to the initial five-year
term or (iii) related to partners who requested an early
buyout of their interest. We purchased 96 of these
noncontrolling interests in their entirety for a total of
$4.7 million, all of which was paid in cash.
39
During fiscal 2010, we will have the opportunity to purchase 11
additional noncontrolling interests which will reach their
five-year anniversary. If all of these interests are purchased,
the total purchase price will approximate less than
$1.0 million based upon the estimated fair value of the
respective interests at January 3, 2010.
Purchase
Commitments
The following table shows our purchase commitments by category
as of January 3, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
42,957
|
|
|
$
|
41,236
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
1,467
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
341,414
|
|
|
|
49,635
|
|
|
|
96,184
|
|
|
|
82,841
|
|
|
|
112,754
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
205,030
|
|
|
|
116,142
|
|
|
|
78,851
|
|
|
|
10,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
592,744
|
|
|
$
|
207,429
|
|
|
$
|
175,993
|
|
|
$
|
93,838
|
|
|
$
|
115,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above does not include obligations related to lease
renewal option periods even if it is reasonably assured that we
will exercise the related option. Additionally, purchase
obligations have been included only to the extent that our
failure to perform would result in formal recourse against us.
Accordingly, certain procurement arrangements that require us to
purchase future items are included, but only to the extent they
include a recourse provision for our failure to purchase.
Other
Commitments
In August 2009, we announced an agreement with FRC Balance LLC,
d/b/a True Food Kitchen, to provide debt capital for the
early-stage development of True Food Kitchen restaurants. The
agreement provides for up to a $10.0 million loan facility
to develop True Food Kitchen restaurants and can, under certain
conditions, be converted by P.F. Changs into a majority
equity position in True Food Kitchen. As of January 3,
2010, no borrowings were outstanding under the loan facility.
New
Accounting Standards
See the Recent Accounting Pronouncements section of Note 1
to our consolidated financial statements for a summary of new
accounting standards.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
We are exposed to market risk primarily from fluctuations in
interest rates on our revolving credit facility and other
borrowings as well as from changes in commodities prices.
Interest
Rates
We have exposure to interest rate risk related to our variable
rate borrowings. Our revolving credit facility allows for
borrowings of up to $75.0 million with outstanding amounts
bearing interest at variable rates equal to LIBOR plus an
applicable margin which is subject to change based on our
leverage ratio. At January 3, 2010, we had borrowings of
$40.0 million outstanding under our credit facility as well
as unsecured promissory notes totaling $1.2 million.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2008, we entered into an
interest rate swap with a notional amount of $40.0 million
to hedge a portion of the cash flows of our variable rate
borrowings. We have designated the interest rate swap as a cash
flow hedge of our exposure to variability in future cash flows
attributable to interest payments on a $40.0 million
tranche of floating rate debt borrowed under our revolving
credit facility. Under the terms of the swap, we pay a fixed
rate of 3.32% on the $40.0 million notional amount and
receive payments from the counterparty based on the
1-month
LIBOR rate for a term ending on May 20, 2010, effectively
resulting in a fixed rate on the LIBOR component of the
$40.0 million notional amount. The effective interest rate
on the total
40
borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility,
including the impact of the interest rate swap agreement, was
4.8% as of January 3, 2010.
Additionally, by using a derivative instrument to hedge
exposures to changes in interest rates, we expose ourselves to
credit risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to
perform under the terms of the derivative contract. We seek to
minimize the credit risk by entering into transactions with
high-quality counterparties whose credit rating is evaluated on
a quarterly basis.
As of January 3, 2010, based on current interest rates and
total borrowings outstanding, including the impact of our
interest rate swap, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase
in interest rates would have an insignificant pre-tax impact on
our results of operations.
Commodities
Prices
We purchase certain commodities such as beef, pork, poultry,
seafood and produce. These commodities are generally purchased
based upon market prices established with vendors. These
purchase arrangements may contain contractual features that fix
the price paid for certain commodities. Historically, we have
not used financial instruments to hedge commodity prices because
these purchase arrangements help control the ultimate cost paid
and any significant commodity price increases have historically
been relatively short-term in nature.
Cash-settled
Awards
We issued cash-settled awards during fiscal 2009, including
performance units, cash-settled stock appreciation rights and
cash-settled stock-based awards. The fair value of these awards
is remeasured at each reporting period until the awards are
settled and is affected by market changes in our stock price
and, in the case of performance units, the relative performance
of our stock price to the performance of the Russell 2000 Index.
Fair value fluctuations are recognized as cumulative adjustments
to share-based compensation expense. See Note 13 to our
consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the
fair value of the cash-settled awards and fair value
fluctuations of cash-settled awards.
41
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
42
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008,
and the related consolidated statements of income, equity, and
cash flows for the years ended January 3, 2010,
December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of January 3, 2010 and December 28,
2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28,
2008, and December 30, 2007, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective December 29, 2008, the Company has
changed its method of accounting and reporting for minority
interests such that they will be recharacterized as
noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
January 3, 2010, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 17, 2010
expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
(signed) KPMG LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
February 17, 2010
43
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
63,499
|
|
|
$
|
40,951
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
5,291
|
|
|
|
4,930
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
38,449
|
|
|
|
51,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
107,239
|
|
|
|
97,524
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
497,928
|
|
|
|
524,004
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
6,819
|
|
|
|
6,819
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
22,241
|
|
|
|
24,270
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
17,923
|
|
|
|
14,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
652,150
|
|
|
$
|
667,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
19,825
|
|
|
$
|
15,203
|
|
Construction payable
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
4,358
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
77,088
|
|
|
|
71,162
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
35,844
|
|
|
|
31,115
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt, including $976 and $3,502 due
to related parties at January 3, 2010 and December 28,
2008, respectively
|
|
|
41,236
|
|
|
|
5,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
175,593
|
|
|
|
127,591
|
|
Lease obligations
|
|
|
116,547
|
|
|
|
113,178
|
|
Long-term debt, including $0 and $1,073 due to related parties
at January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
82,496
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
18,488
|
|
|
|
14,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
311,840
|
|
|
|
337,956
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PFCB common stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 40,000,000 shares
authorized: 22,911,054 shares and 24,114,107 shares
issued and outstanding at January 3, 2010 and
December 28, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
217,181
|
|
|
|
206,667
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 5,064,733 shares and
3,634,979 shares at January 3, 2010 and
December 28, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
(146,022
|
)
|
|
|
(106,372
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(755
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
264,456
|
|
|
|
221,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total PFCB common stockholders equity
|
|
|
335,349
|
|
|
|
320,826
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
4,961
|
|
|
|
8,581
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
340,310
|
|
|
|
329,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
652,150
|
|
|
$
|
667,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
44
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,228,179
|
|
|
$
|
1,198,124
|
|
|
$
|
1,084,193
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
326,421
|
|
|
|
325,630
|
|
|
|
297,242
|
|
Labor
|
|
|
401,583
|
|
|
|
396,911
|
|
|
|
364,074
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
203,859
|
|
|
|
198,967
|
|
|
|
172,147
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
70,635
|
|
|
|
69,809
|
|
|
|
62,164
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
82,749
|
|
|
|
77,488
|
|
|
|
66,968
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
74,429
|
|
|
|
68,711
|
|
|
|
55,988
|
|
Preopening expense
|
|
|
3,919
|
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
14,310
|
|
Partner investment expense
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
(2,012
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,162,966
|
|
|
|
1,145,619
|
|
|
|
1,030,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
65,213
|
|
|
|
52,505
|
|
|
|
53,312
|
|
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(1,637
|
)
|
|
|
(3,362
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes
|
|
|
63,576
|
|
|
|
49,143
|
|
|
|
53,212
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(18,492
|
)
|
|
|
(12,193
|
)
|
|
|
(12,420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
|
45,084
|
|
|
|
36,950
|
|
|
|
40,792
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
(7,591
|
)
|
|
|
(4,560
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
44,605
|
|
|
|
29,359
|
|
|
|
36,232
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
4,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to PFCB
|
|
$
|
43,197
|
|
|
$
|
27,426
|
|
|
$
|
32,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
$
|
1.47
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, attributable to
PFCB common stockholders
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to PFCB common stockholders
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
1.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, attributable to
PFCB common stockholders
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.31
|
)
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to PFCB common stockholders
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
22,986
|
|
|
|
23,776
|
|
|
|
25,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
23,413
|
|
|
|
24,080
|
|
|
|
25,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to PFCB:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
43,676
|
|
|
$
|
35,017
|
|
|
$
|
36,623
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
(7,591
|
)
|
|
|
(4,560
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to PFCB
|
|
$
|
43,197
|
|
|
$
|
27,426
|
|
|
$
|
32,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
45
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PFCB Common Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
25,373
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
174,101
|
|
|
$
|
(46,373
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
161,770
|
|
|
$
|
33,315
|
|
|
$
|
322,840
|
|
Issuance of common stock under stock option plans
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,617
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
Issuance of restricted shares under incentive plans, net of
forfeitures
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(1,844
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,985
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,985
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,512
|
|
Tax benefit from share-based compensation, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,981
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,365
|
)
|
|
|
(6,365
|
)
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interest partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
Purchases of noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,699
|
)
|
|
|
(13,699
|
)
|
Partner investment expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,012
|
)
|
|
|
(2,012
|
)
|
Partner bonus expense, imputed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,063
|
|
|
|
4,169
|
|
|
|
36,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 30, 2007
|
|
|
24,152
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
196,385
|
|
|
|
(96,358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,833
|
|
|
|
17,169
|
|
|
|
311,056
|
|
Issuance of common stock under stock option plans
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
Issuance of restricted shares under incentive plans, net of
forfeitures
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,014
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,014
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,715
|
|
Tax shortfall from share-based compensation, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(755
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(755
|
)
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,323
|
)
|
|
|
(3,323
|
)
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interest partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
Purchases of noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,002
|
)
|
|
|
(8,002
|
)
|
Partner investment expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
Partner bonus expense, imputed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
913
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,426
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
29,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 28, 2008
|
|
|
24,114
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
206,667
|
|
|
|
(106,372
|
)
|
|
|
(755
|
)
|
|
|
221,259
|
|
|
|
8,581
|
|
|
|
329,407
|
|
Issuance of common stock under stock option plans
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,892
|
|
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
Shares withheld for taxes on restricted stock, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(673
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(673
|
)
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(1,430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,650
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,700
|
|
Tax benefit from share-based compensation, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,749
|
)
|
|
|
(1,749
|
)
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interest partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Purchases of noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,184
|
)
|
|
|
(4,710
|
)
|
Partner investment expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
Partner bonus expense, imputed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,197
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
44,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, January 3, 2010
|
|
|
22,911
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
217,181
|
|
|
$
|
(146,022
|
)
|
|
$
|
(294
|
)
|
|
$
|
264,456
|
|
|
$
|
4,961
|
|
|
$
|
340,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Share-based compensation expense includes equity-settled awards
only. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
44,605
|
|
|
$
|
29,359
|
|
|
$
|
36,232
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
74,429
|
|
|
|
69,661
|
|
|
|
57,251
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
11,552
|
|
|
|
9,715
|
|
|
|
10,512
|
|
Non-cash asset impairment and lease termination charges in
discontinued operations
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
9,889
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(4,354
|
)
|
|
|
5,381
|
|
|
|
4,767
|
|
Partner bonus expense, imputed
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
Other
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
Partner investment expense
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
(2,012
|
)
|
Tax (benefit) shortfall from share-based compensation, net
|
|
|
(1,348
|
)
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
(3,981
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
17,640
|
|
|
|
(18,406
|
)
|
|
|
(786
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,398
|
)
|
|
|
(434
|
)
|
|
|
(3,937
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
4,622
|
|
|
|
(2,542
|
)
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
4,015
|
|
|
|
9,524
|
|
|
|
3,411
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
4,729
|
|
|
|
5,769
|
|
|
|
7,120
|
|
Lease obligations
|
|
|
4,382
|
|
|
|
19,914
|
|
|
|
21,911
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,377
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
160,419
|
|
|
|
139,753
|
|
|
|
137,920
|
|
Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(49,865
|
)
|
|
|
(87,178
|
)
|
|
|
(151,553
|
)
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
(708
|
)
|
|
|
(1,791
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(50,118
|
)
|
|
|
(87,886
|
)
|
|
|
(153,344
|
)
|
Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(45,850
|
)
|
|
|
(12,512
|
)
|
|
|
(30,475
|
)
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(39,650
|
)
|
|
|
(10,014
|
)
|
|
|
(49,985
|
)
|
Purchases of noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(4,710
|
)
|
|
|
(9,763
|
)
|
|
|
(13,032
|
)
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest partners
|
|
|
(1,749
|
)
|
|
|
(3,323
|
)
|
|
|
(6,365
|
)
|
Payments of capital lease obligation
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
Borrowings on credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,000
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interest partners
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
Tax benefit (shortfall) from share-based compensation, net
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
|
|
3,981
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised and employee stock
purchases
|
|
|
2,993
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
7,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(87,753
|
)
|
|
|
(34,971
|
)
|
|
|
7,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
22,548
|
|
|
|
16,896
|
|
|
|
(7,534
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
|
|
|
40,951
|
|
|
|
24,055
|
|
|
|
31,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
|
|
$
|
63,499
|
|
|
$
|
40,951
|
|
|
$
|
24,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
3,478
|
|
|
$
|
5,442
|
|
|
$
|
1,907
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds
|
|
$
|
11,782
|
|
|
$
|
9,842
|
|
|
$
|
4,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of noncontrolling interests through issuance of
long-term-debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,693
|
|
|
$
|
11,732
|
|
Change in construction payable
|
|
$
|
(2,758
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,961
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,244
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
47
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
January 3, 2010
|
|
1.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Organization
and Nature of Operations
P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc. (the Company)
operates two restaurant concepts consisting of restaurants
throughout the United States under the names P.F. Changs
China Bistro (Bistro) and Pei Wei Asian Diner
(Pei Wei). The Company was formed in 1996 and became
publicly traded in 1998.
Fiscal
Year
The Companys fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to the
end of December. Fiscal year 2009 was comprised of 53 weeks
and fiscal years 2008 and 2007 were each comprised of
52 weeks.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Principles
of Consolidation and Presentation
The Companys consolidated financial statements include the
accounts and operations of the Company and its majority-owned
subsidiaries. All material balances and transactions between the
consolidated entities have been eliminated. Beginning fiscal
2009, noncontrolling interests (previously shown as minority
interest) are reported below net income under the heading
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
in the consolidated income statements and shown as a component
of equity in the consolidated balance sheets. See Recent
Accounting Literature for further discussion.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts shown in the prior periods consolidated
financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
current year consolidated financial statement presentation.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Companys cash and cash equivalent balances are not
pledged or restricted. The Companys policy is to invest
cash in excess of operating requirements in income-producing
investments. Income-producing investments with maturities of
three months or less at the time of investment are reflected as
cash equivalents. Amounts receivable from credit card processors
are also considered cash equivalents because they are both
short-term and highly liquid in nature and are typically
converted to cash within three days of the sales transaction.
Cash equivalents as of January 3, 2010 and
December 28, 2008 consisted primarily of money market fund
investments and amounts receivable from credit card processors.
Receivables
Receivables, which the Company classifies within other current
assets, consist primarily of amounts due from landlords for
tenant incentives and amounts due from third-party gift card
sales. Management believes outstanding amounts to be collectible.
Inventories
Inventories consist of food and beverages and are stated at the
lower of cost or market using the
first-in,
first-out method.
48
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost, which includes
capitalized interest during the construction and development
period. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful service lives of
the related assets, which approximate seven years. The
Companys home office building is depreciated on a
straight-line basis over 30 years, and building
improvements are depreciated on a straight-line basis over
20 years. Leasehold improvements and buildings under
capital leases are amortized over the shorter of the useful life
of the asset or the length of the related lease term. The term
of the lease includes renewal option periods only in instances
in which the exercise of the renewal option can be reasonably
assured and failure to exercise such option would result in an
economic penalty. China and smallwares are generally depreciated
over two years up to 50 percent of their original cost and
replacements are recorded as operating expenses as they are
purchased.
Depreciation and amortization expense included in continuing
operations includes the depreciation and amortization of fixed
assets, gains and losses on disposal of assets and the
amortization of intangible assets, non-transferable liquor
license fees and capitalized software costs, which totaled
$74.4 million, $68.7 million and $56.0 million
for the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28,
2008, and December 30, 2007, respectively. Depreciation and
amortization expense included in continuing operations
associated with property and equipment, including property under
capital leases, which totaled $71.0 million,
$65.5 million, and $53.3 million for the years ended
January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and
December 30, 2007, respectively.
During the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28,
2008, and December 30, 2007, the Company incurred gross
interest expense of $3.1 million, $4.8 million, and
$2.5 million, respectively. Of these amounts,
$0.3 million, $0.7 million, and $1.8 million,
respectively, were capitalized during the years ended
January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and
December 30, 2007.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to annual impairment
tests. Intangible assets deemed to have definite lives are
amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the residual purchase price after allocation
of the purchase price of assets acquired and relates to the
Companys purchase of interests in various restaurants at
the formation of the Company. Impairment tests are performed
with respect to goodwill at the segment level of reporting. On
an annual basis, the Company reviews the recoverability of
goodwill based primarily on a multiple of earnings analysis
which compares the estimated fair value of the reporting segment
to the carrying value. As a secondary review, the Company also
compares the market value of its common stock to the total
Company carrying value. Generally, the Company performs its
annual assessment for impairment during the fourth quarter of
its fiscal year and performs the analysis more frequently if
there are any impairment indicators identified during the year.
As of January 3, 2010, management determined there was no
impairment of goodwill. There can be no assurance that future
goodwill impairment tests will not result in a charge to
earnings.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible assets were historically recognized upon the
Companys buyout of noncontrolling interests when the
Companys purchase price exceeded the imputed fair value at
the time of the partners original investment. Beginning
fiscal 2009 upon the adoption of new accounting guidance, an
intangible asset is no longer recognized upon buyout of
noncontrolling interests. Instead, any excess of the
Companys purchase price over the imputed fair value is
recognized as additional-paid-in-capital in equity. See
Noncontrolling Interests in Recent Accounting
49
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Literature for further discussion. Intangible assets outstanding
as of December 28, 2008 continue to be amortized over their
useful lives.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews property and equipment and intangible assets
with finite lives (those assets resulting from the acquisition
of partners noncontrolling interests in the operating
rights of certain of our restaurants) for impairment when events
or circumstances indicate these assets might be impaired, but at
least quarterly. An analysis is performed at the individual
restaurant level and primarily includes an assessment of
historical cash flows and other relevant facts and
circumstances. For restaurants open greater than two years,
negative restaurant-level cash flows over the previous
twelve-month period is considered a potential impairment
indicator. In these situations, the Company evaluates future
restaurant cash flow projections in conjunction with qualitative
factors and future operating plans. Based on this assessment,
the Company either (a) continues to monitor these
restaurants over the near-term for evidence of improved
performance or (b) immediately recognizes an impairment
charge based on the amount by which the asset carrying value
exceeds fair value, which is based on undiscounted future cash
flows.
In the past, restaurants under monitoring have typically
achieved cash flow improvements in a timely fashion such that no
impairment charge was deemed necessary and the restaurant was
removed from active monitoring. During the year-ended
December 28, 2008, the Company recognized non-cash asset
impairment charges of $7.5 million ($4.6 million net
of tax) related to the write-off of the carrying value of the
long-lived assets associated with the closure of 10 Pei Wei
stores. During the year-ended December 30, 2007, the
Company recognized an asset impairment charge of
$3.1 million ($2.1 million net of tax) related to the
write-off of the carrying value of the long-lived assets of
Taneko associated with the fiscal 2008 asset sale. See
Note 2 for further discussion. No other impairment of
long-lived assets was recognized by the Company during the years
ended December 28, 2008 and December 30, 2007. There
were no impairments recognized by the Company during the year
ended January 3, 2010. There can be no assurance that
future impairment tests will not result in additional charges to
earnings.
The Companys impairment assessment process requires the
use of estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows and
operating outcomes, which are subject to a significant degree of
judgment based on experience and knowledge. These estimates can
be significantly impacted by changes in the economic
environment, real estate market conditions and overall operating
performance. At any given time, the Company is actively
monitoring a small number of restaurants and impairment charges
could be triggered in the future if individual restaurant
performance does not improve or if management decides to close
that location. Also, if current economic conditions worsen,
additional restaurants could be placed on active monitoring and
potentially trigger impairment charges in future periods.
Other
Assets
Other assets consist primarily of transferable and
nontransferable liquor licenses, capitalized software costs,
deferred compensation plan assets (see Note 13 for
additional information), vendor deposits, trademarks and
deferred financing costs. Nontransferable liquor licenses and
trademarks are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of
the asset or the length of the related lease or contract term.
The term of the lease or contract includes renewal option
periods only in instances in which the exercise of the renewal
option can be reasonably assured and failure to exercise such
option would result in an economic penalty. Capitalized software
costs are typically amortized over five years. See Note 6
for additional details on the Companys other assets.
Accrued
Insurance
The Company is self-insured for certain exposures, principally
medical and dental, general liability and workers
compensation, for the first $100,000, $250,000 or $500,000 of
individual claims, depending on the type of claim. The Company
has paid amounts to its insurance carrier that approximate the
cost of claims known to date and has accrued additional
liabilities for its estimate of ultimate costs related to those
claims. In developing these estimates, the Company uses
historical experience factors to estimate the ultimate claim
exposure. The Companys self insurance liabilities are
actuarially determined and consider estimates of expected
losses, based on statistical
50
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
analyses of the Companys actual historical trends as well
as historical industry data. It is reasonably possible that
future adjustments to these estimates will be required.
Management believes the Company has provided adequate reserves
for its self-insured exposure.
Lease
Obligations
The Company leases all of its restaurant properties. At the
inception of the lease, each property is evaluated to determine
whether the lease will be accounted for as an operating or
capital lease. The term of the lease used for this evaluation
includes renewal option periods only in instances in which the
exercise of the renewal option can be reasonably assured and
failure to exercise such option would result in an economic
penalty.
The Company accounts for tenant incentives received from its
landlords in connection with certain of its operating leases as
a deferred rent liability within lease obligations and amortizes
such amounts over the relevant lease term. For leases that
contain rent escalations, the Company records the total rent
payable during the lease term, as determined above, on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease (including the
rent holiday period beginning upon possession of the
premises), and records the difference between the minimum rents
paid and the straight-line rent as a lease obligation.
Certain leases contain provisions that require additional rental
payments based upon restaurant sales volume (contingent
rent). Contingent rent is accrued each period as the
liability is incurred, in addition to the straight-line rent
expense noted above.
Other
Liabilities
Other liabilities include the Companys conditional asset
retirement obligations (ARO), which are primarily
associated with certain of the Companys restaurant leases
under which the landlord has the option to require, at a future
date, the Company to remove its leasehold improvements at the
end of the lease term and return the property to the landlord in
its original condition. The Company estimates the fair value of
these liabilities based on estimated store closing costs,
accretes that current cost forward to the date of estimated ARO
removal and discounts the future cost back as if it were
performed at the inception of the lease. At the inception of
such a lease, the Company records the ARO liability and also
records a related capital asset in an amount equal to the
estimated fair value of the liability. The ARO liability is
accreted to its future value, with accretion expense recognized
as interest and other income, net, and the capitalized asset is
depreciated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the
asset, which is generally the life of the leasehold improvement.
The estimate of the conditional asset retirement liability is
based on a number of assumptions requiring managements
judgment, including store closing costs, inflation rates and
discount rates. As a result, in future periods the Company may
make adjustments to the ARO liability as a result of the
availability of new information, changes in estimated costs,
inflation rates and other factors. See Note 12 for further
details of the Companys other liabilities.
Other liabilities also include the Companys net long-term
deferred tax liabilities, liabilities related to the
Companys deferred compensation plans (discussed further in
Note 13) and a derivative liability (discussed further
in this footnote and Note 8).
Unearned
Revenue
The Company sells gift cards to customers in its restaurants,
through its websites and via other retail outlets. Unearned
revenue represents gift cards sold for which revenue recognition
criteria, generally redemption, has not been met. These amounts
are presented net of any discounts issued by the Company in
connection with the terms of its third-party gift card
distribution agreements.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues from food, beverage and alcohol sales are recognized as
products are sold.
The Company recognizes income from gift cards when: (i) the
gift card is redeemed by the customer; or (ii) the
likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the customer is
remote (gift card breakage) and the Company
51
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
determines there is no legal obligation to remit the value of
unredeemed gift cards to the relevant jurisdictions. The Company
determines the gift card breakage rate based upon historical
redemption patterns. Gift card breakage income was not
significant in any fiscal year and is reported within revenues
in the consolidated statements of income.
Initial territory fees received pursuant to licensing agreements
are recognized as revenue when the Company has performed its
material obligations under the agreement, which is typically
after the opening of a certain number of restaurants within the
territory. Store opening fees are recognized as revenue when the
Company has substantially performed its obligations to assist
the licensee in opening a new restaurant, which is generally at
the time such restaurant opens for business. Ongoing royalty
fees from licensed restaurants are based on a percentage of
restaurant sales and are recognized as revenue in the period the
related restaurants revenues are earned.
Ongoing royalty fees from retail product are based on a
percentage of product sales, and are recognized as revenue upon
the sale of the product to retail outlets.
Advertising
The Company expenses advertising production costs at the time
the advertising first takes place. All other advertising costs
are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense for the years
ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and
December 30, 2007 was $10.4 million,
$9.2 million, and $5.5 million, respectively.
Partner
Bonus Expense, Imputed
Partner bonus expense, imputed, which is classified within labor
expense on the consolidated statements of income, represents the
portion of restaurant level operating results that is allocable
to certain noncontrolling partners, but which is presented as
bonus expense for accounting purposes. Specifically, given that
employees who choose to invest as partners are not eligible to
participate in restaurant-level bonus programs, a portion of
their partnership earnings that would otherwise be presented as
net income attributable to noncontrolling interests expense is
deemed to be a bonus expense for financial reporting purposes.
The amounts imputed are based on existing bonus programs used by
the Company for non-investing employees based on individual
restaurant-level operating results. Partner bonus expense,
imputed for the years ended January 3, 2010,
December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007 was
$0.5 million, $0.9 million, and $1.4 million,
respectively.
Preopening
Expense
Preopening expense, consisting primarily of manager salaries,
employee payroll and related training costs incurred prior to
the opening of a restaurant, is expensed as incurred. Preopening
expense also includes the accrual for straight-line rent
recorded during the period between date of possession and the
restaurant opening date for the Companys leased restaurant
locations.
Partner
Investment Expense
Partner investment expense generally represents the difference
between the imputed fair value of noncontrolling interests at
the time the partners invest in their restaurants and the
partners cash capital contribution for these ownership
interests. Additionally, for those interests that are bought out
prior to the restaurant reaching maturity (typically after five
years of operation), partner investment expense includes a
reversal of previously recognized expense for the difference
between the fair value of the noncontrolling interest at
inception date and the fair value at the date of repurchase, to
the extent that the former is greater.
Consolidated partner investment expense for the years ended
January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008 and
December 30, 2007 was a net benefit of $0.6 million,
$0.4 million and $2.0 million, respectively. See
Note 16 for further discussion on the Companys
partnership structure.
52
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Taxes
The Company utilizes the liability method of accounting for
income taxes in which deferred taxes are determined based on the
difference between the financial statement and tax basis of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the
years in which the differences are expected to reverse.
Recognition of deferred tax assets is limited to amounts
considered by management to be more likely than not of
realization in future periods.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense.
See Note 17 for additional information regarding the change
in unrecognized tax benefits.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests relating to
the income or loss of consolidated partnerships includes no
provision for income taxes as any tax liability related thereto
is the responsibility of the individual noncontrolling interest
investors.
Additionally, the Company presents sales tax on a net basis in
its consolidated financial statements.
Share-Based
Compensation
The Company has granted equity-settled and liability-settled
awards to certain of its employees and directors, and accounts
for the awards based on the fair value measurement guidance. The
estimated fair value of share-based compensation is amortized to
expense over the vesting period. See Note 13 for further
discussion of related accounting for share-based compensation.
Income
from Continuing Operations Attributable to PFCB per
Share
Basic income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB per
share is computed based on the weighted average of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted income from continuing
operations attributable to PFCB per share is computed based on
the weighted average number of shares of common stock and
potentially dilutive securities, which includes options,
restricted stock and RSUs outstanding under the Companys
equity plans and employee stock purchase plan. For the years
ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and
December 30, 2007, 2.1 million, 2.3 million, and
1.6 million, respectively, of the Companys options
were excluded from the calculation due to their anti-dilutive
effect.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB
per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB common
stockholders, net of tax
|
|
$
|
43,676
|
|
|
$
|
35,017
|
|
|
$
|
36,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: Weighted-average shares outstanding during the year
|
|
|
22,986
|
|
|
|
23,776
|
|
|
|
25,473
|
|
Add: Dilutive effect of equity awards
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
23,413
|
|
|
|
24,080
|
|
|
|
25,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB common
stockholders per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
$
|
1.47
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, receivables,
accounts payable, and accrued expenses is deemed to approximate
fair value due to the immediate or short-term maturity of these
financial instruments. The fair value of long-term debt
approximates the carrying value due to the Companys right
to repay outstanding balances at any time.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of
cash investments and receivables. The Company maintains cash and
cash equivalents, funds on deposit and certain other financial
instruments with financial institutions that are considered in
the Companys investment strategy. Concentrations of credit
risk with respect to receivables are limited as the
Companys receivables are primarily related to tenant
incentives from landlords and third party gift card sales.
Derivatives
All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair
value as either assets or liabilities. The fair value of the
Companys derivative financial instruments is determined
using either market quotes or valuation models that are based
upon the net present value of estimated future cash flows and
incorporate current market data inputs. The Company reports its
derivative assets or liabilities in other assets, other
liabilities, other current assets or accrued expenses as
applicable. The accounting for the change in the fair value of a
derivative financial instrument depends on its intended use and
the resulting hedge designation, if any, as discussed below.
A cash flow hedge is a derivative designed to hedge the exposure
of variable future cash flows that is attributable to a
particular risk associated with an existing recognized asset or
liability, or a forecasted transaction. The Company utilizes the
hypothetical derivative method to measure hedge effectiveness.
For derivative financial instruments that qualify as cash flow
hedges, the effective portions of the gain or loss on the
derivatives are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
(loss) income and reclassified into earnings when the hedged
cash flows are recognized into earnings. The amount that is
reclassified into earnings, as well as any ineffective portion
of the gain or loss, as determined by the accounting
requirements, are reported as a component of interest and other
income (expense). If a hedge is de-designated or terminated
prior to maturity, the amount previously recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income is recognized into earnings
over the period that the hedged item impacts earnings. If a
hedge relationship is discontinued because it is probable that a
forecasted transaction will not occur according to the original
strategy, any related amounts previously recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income are recognized into earnings
immediately. There was no hedge ineffectiveness recognized
during the periods ended January 3, 2010, and
December 28, 2008.
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company hedged a portion
of its existing long-term variable-rate debt through the use of
an interest rate swap. This derivative instrument effectively
fixes the interest expense on a portion of the Companys
long-term debt for the duration of the swap. See Note 8 for
further discussion of the Companys interest rate swap.
Recent
Accounting Literature
Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting
Standards Codification
(Accounting
Standards Update (ASU)
2009-01)
In June 2009, FASB approved the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (the Codification) as the single source
of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. All existing accounting
standard documents, such as FASB, American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues Task Force and
other related literature, excluding guidance from the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC), have been superseded
by the
54
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Codification. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting
literature not included in the Codification has become
nonauthoritative. The Codification did not change GAAP, but
instead introduced a new structure that combines all
authoritative standards into a comprehensive, topically
organized online database. The Codification is effective for
interim or annual periods ending after September 15, 2009,
and impacts the Companys financial statements as all
future references to authoritative accounting literature will be
referenced in accordance with the Codification. There have been
no changes to the content of the Companys financial
statements or disclosures as a result of implementing the
Codification.
As a result of the Companys implementation of the
Codification during fiscal 2009, previous references to new
accounting standards and literature are no longer applicable. In
the current year financial statements, the Company will provide
reference to both new and old guidance to assist in
understanding the impacts of recently adopted accounting
literature, particularly for guidance adopted since the
beginning of the current fiscal year but prior to the
Codification.
Subsequent
Events
(Included
in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 855
Subsequent Events, previously SFAS No. 165
Subsequent Events)
SFAS No. 165 established general standards of
accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the
balance sheet date, but before the financial statements are
issued or available to be issued (subsequent
events). An entity is required to disclose the date
through which subsequent events have been evaluated and the
basis for that date. For public entities, this is the date the
financial statements are issued. SFAS No. 165 does not
apply to subsequent events or transactions that are within the
scope of other GAAP and did not result in significant changes in
the subsequent events reported by the Company.
SFAS No. 165 became effective for interim or annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009 and did not impact the
Companys consolidated financial statements. The Company
evaluated for subsequent events through February 17, 2010,
the issuance date of the Companys financial statements. No
recognized subsequent events were noted. See Note 21 for a
discussion of the Companys non-recognized subsequent
events.
Determination
of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets
(Included
in ASC 350 Intangibles Goodwill and
Other, previously FSP SFAS
No. 142-3
Determination of the Useful Lives of Intangible
Assets)
FSP
SFAS No. 142-3
amended the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under previously issued
goodwill and intangible assets topics. This change was intended
to improve the consistency between the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset and the period of expected cash
flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under topics
related to business combinations and other GAAP. The requirement
for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to
intangible assets acquired after the effective date and the
disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all
intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the
effective date. FSP
SFAS No. 142-3
became effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of FSP
SFAS No. 142-3
did not impact the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
Noncontrolling
Interests
(Included
in ASC 810 Consolidation, previously
SFAS No. 160 Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB
No. 51)
SFAS No. 160 changed the accounting and reporting for
minority interests such that they will be recharacterized as
noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of
equity. SFAS No. 160 became effective for fiscal
55
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
years beginning after December 15, 2008 with early
application prohibited. The Company implemented
SFAS No. 160 at the start of fiscal 2009 and no longer
records an intangible asset when the purchase price of a
noncontrolling interest exceeds the book value at the time of
buyout. Any excess or shortfall for buyouts of noncontrolling
interests in mature restaurants is recognized as an adjustment
to additional paid-in capital in stockholders equity. Any
shortfall resulting from the early buyout of noncontrolling
interests will continue to be recognized as a benefit in partner
investment expense up to the initial amount recognized at the
time of buy-in. Additionally, operating losses can be allocated
to noncontrolling interests even when such allocation results in
a deficit balance (i.e. book value can go negative).
The Company presents noncontrolling interests (previously shown
as minority interest) as a component of equity on its
consolidated balance sheets. Minority interest expense is no
longer separately reported as a reduction to net income on the
consolidated income statement, but is instead shown below net
income under the heading net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests. The adoption of
SFAS No. 160 did not have any other material impact on
the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities Amended
(Included
in ASC 810 Consolidation, SFAS No. 167
Amendments to FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R))
SFAS No. 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
regarding certain guidance for determining whether an entity is
a variable interest entity and modifies the methods allowed for
determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest
entity. The amendments include: (1) the elimination of the
exemption for qualifying special purpose entities, (2) a
new approach for determining who should consolidate a
variable-interest entity, and (3) changes to when it is
necessary to reassess who should consolidate a variable-interest
entity. SFAS No. 167 is effective for the first annual
reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009, with
earlier adoption prohibited. The Company will adopt
SFAS No. 167 in fiscal 2010 and does not anticipate
any material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
2.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
Discontinued operations include results attributable to 10 Pei
Wei restaurants that were closed during the fourth quarter of
2008 and Taneko Japanese Tavern (Taneko), a third
restaurant concept developed in 2006 whose assets were sold on
August 1, 2008. Loss from discontinued operations includes
both the historical results of operations as well as estimated
and actual lease termination costs associated with the 10 closed
Pei Wei restaurants and Taneko.
Pei
Wei
As part of ongoing profitability initiatives, the Company closed
10 underperforming Pei Wei restaurants during the fourth quarter
of 2008. This decision, which was reached during the third
quarter of 2008, was the result of a rigorous evaluation of the
Companys entire store portfolio. The Company reviewed each
locations past and present operating performance combined
with projected future results. The restaurants selected for
closure had lower profitability and were not projected to
provide acceptable returns in the foreseeable future.
During the second half of fiscal 2008, the Company recognized a
non-cash asset impairment charge of $7.5 million
($4.6 million net of tax) related to the write-off of the
carrying value of long-lived assets associated with the 10 Pei
Wei store closures, which was included in discontinued
operations. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the
Company recognized additional pretax charges of
$2.6 million related to estimated and actual lease
termination costs and $0.1 million related to severance
payments made in connection with the store closures, which was
included in discontinued operations. During fiscal 2009, the
Company recognized additional pretax charges of
$1.4 million related to estimated and actual lease
termination costs.
56
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company is pursuing lease termination agreements with each
of the closed Pei Wei restaurants landlords as well as
potential
sub-tenant
agreements. Lease termination agreements for seven of the ten
locations have been executed as of the date of this
Form 10-K.
Activity associated with the lease termination accrual is
summarized below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
2,379
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
Charges
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$
|
1,416
|
|
|
$
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges include additional amounts recognized based on
availability of new information which led to updated estimates
of anticipated lease termination costs for certain closed
locations where the accrual recorded at the time of lease
termination was insufficient. Cash payments include settlement
payments as well as ongoing rent and other property-related
payments. From store closure date through January 3, 2010,
the Company has recognized and reported in discontinued
operations a total of $4.0 million in lease termination
charges for the closed Pei Wei locations. The lease termination
accrual is included in accrued expenses on the consolidated
balance sheets with the timing of payments uncertain.
Goodwill allocated to the Pei Wei concept totaled
$0.3 million. The Company did not record any impairment to
Pei Wei goodwill related to the fiscal 2008 store closures.
The Company determined that each individual Pei Wei restaurant
represents a component of an entity since each store has
separately identifiable operations and cash flows. Each
restaurant is therefore considered a reporting unit in
accordance with accounting guidance for goodwill and intangible
assets. The ten closed restaurants were not in close proximity
to other Pei Wei restaurants and the Company does not anticipate
having significant ongoing cash inflows or outflows related to
these operations subsequent to closure and lease termination. As
a result, the Company determined that the Pei Wei restaurant
closures met the criteria for classification as discontinued
operations in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. As a result, all historical operating results as
well as asset impairment, lease termination and severance
charges related to the closed stores are reflected within
discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements
for all periods presented.
Taneko
The Company opened its Taneko Japanese Tavern
(Taneko) restaurant on October 1, 2006 in
Scottsdale, Arizona. As a result of the operating losses
realized by Taneko and managements increased focus on the
Companys core Bistro and Pei Wei restaurant concepts, at
the end of fiscal 2007 the Company decided to exit operation of
the Taneko business. As of December 30, 2007, the Company
classified Taneko as held for sale and determined that Taneko
met the criteria for classification as a discontinued operation
in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. During
the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company recognized a non-cash
asset impairment charge of $3.1 million ($2.1 million
net of tax) related to the write-off of the carrying value of
Tanekos long-lived assets, which was included in
discontinued operations. On August 1, 2008, the Company
completed the sale of Tanekos long-lived assets.
57
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Loss
from Discontinued Operations
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax is comprised of
the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,597
|
|
|
$
|
11,089
|
|
Lease termination charges
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before income tax benefit(1)
|
|
|
(786
|
)
|
|
|
(4,932
|
)
|
|
|
(3,951
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
1,923
|
|
|
|
1,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, before asset
impairment charges
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
(3,009
|
)
|
|
|
(2,507
|
)
|
Asset impairment charges, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,582
|
)
|
|
|
(2,053
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(479
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,591
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,560
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes lease termination charges, deferred rent write-offs
upon lease termination and deferred rent amortization |
Other current assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
$
|
15,752
|
|
|
$
|
24,867
|
|
Current portion of deferred tax asset
|
|
|
11,036
|
|
|
|
8,344
|
|
Prepaid rent
|
|
|
5,508
|
|
|
|
5,180
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
2,388
|
|
|
|
9,960
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,765
|
|
|
|
3,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other current assets
|
|
$
|
38,449
|
|
|
$
|
51,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables as of January 3, 2010 and December 28,
2008 are primarily comprised of amounts due from landlords for
tenant incentives as a result of new restaurant openings and
amounts due from third-party gift card sales.
|
|
4.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
3,681
|
|
|
$
|
3,681
|
|
Building and improvements
|
|
|
15,357
|
|
|
|
15,337
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
600,798
|
|
|
|
576,861
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
182,970
|
|
|
|
167,153
|
|
China and smallwares
|
|
|
17,883
|
|
|
|
17,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820,689
|
|
|
|
780,201
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(325,108
|
)
|
|
|
(262,775
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495,581
|
|
|
|
517,426
|
|
Add: Construction in progress
|
|
|
2,347
|
|
|
|
6,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
497,928
|
|
|
$
|
524,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Intangible assets consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Intangible assets, gross
|
|
$
|
29,863
|
|
|
$
|
29,863
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(7,622
|
)
|
|
|
(5,593
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
22,241
|
|
|
$
|
24,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets included in
depreciation and amortization expense in the consolidated income
statement, for the years ended January 3, 2010,
December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007 was
$2.0 million, $2.2 million, and $1.7 million,
respectively.
The estimated aggregate annual amortization expense for
intangible assets at January 3, 2010, is summarized as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
2,240
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,240
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,215
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
11,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Software, net
|
|
$
|
5,459
|
|
|
$
|
4,581
|
|
Liquor licenses, net
|
|
|
6,836
|
|
|
|
6,632
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
3,454
|
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
1,898
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
$
|
17,923
|
|
|
$
|
14,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Accrued payroll
|
|
$
|
26,262
|
|
|
$
|
25,409
|
|
Accrued insurance
|
|
|
17,426
|
|
|
|
16,130
|
|
Sales and use tax payable
|
|
|
7,104
|
|
|
|
5,026
|
|
Property tax payable
|
|
|
3,638
|
|
|
|
4,151
|
|
Accrued rent
|
|
|
3,730
|
|
|
|
4,315
|
|
Derivative Liability(1)
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
18,457
|
|
|
|
16,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
77,088
|
|
|
$
|
71,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Derivative Liability was reclassified from other liabilities
during fiscal year 2009 |
59
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On August 31, 2007, the Company entered into a senior
credit facility (Credit Facility) with several
commercial financial institutions, which allowed for borrowings
of up to $150.0 million. On December 15, 2009, the
Company amended the Credit Facility which reduced the borrowings
allowed to $75.0 million and modified certain restrictive
language regarding restricted payments such as dividends and
share repurchases. The Credit Facility expires on
August 30, 2013 and contains customary representations,
warranties, negative and affirmative covenants, including a
requirement to maintain a maximum leverage ratio, as defined, of
2.5:1 and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined, of
1.25:1, as well as customary events of default and certain
default provisions that could result in acceleration of the
Credit Facility. The Company was in compliance with these
restrictions and conditions as of January 3, 2010 as the
Companys leverage ratio was 1.23:1 and the fixed charge
coverage ratio was 2.19:1.
The Credit Facility is guaranteed by the Companys material
existing and future domestic subsidiaries. As of January 3,
2010, the Company had borrowings outstanding under the Credit
Facility totaling $40.0 million as well as
$11.2 million committed for the issuance of letters of
credit, which is required by insurance companies for the
Companys workers compensation and general liability
insurance programs. Available borrowings under the Credit
Facility were $23.8 million at January 3, 2010.
Interest
Rate Swap
During the second quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company entered
into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of
$40.0 million. The purpose of this transaction is to
provide a hedge against the effects of changes in interest rates
on a portion of the Companys current variable rate
borrowings. The Company has designated the interest rate swap as
a cash flow hedge of its exposure to variability in future cash
flows attributable to interest payments on a $40.0 million
tranche of floating rate debt.
Under the terms of the interest rate swap, the Company pays a
fixed rate of 3.32% on the $40.0 million notional amount
and receives payments from its counterparty based on the
1-month
LIBOR rate for a term ending on May 20, 2010, effectively
resulting in a fixed rate on the LIBOR component of the
$40.0 million notional amount. Interest rate differentials
paid or received under the swap agreement are recognized as
adjustments to interest expense.
At January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, the recorded
fair value of the interest rate swap was a liability of
$0.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively
($0.3 million and $0.8 million, net of tax,
respectively). The interest rate swap is reported in the
consolidated balance sheets within accrued expenses at
January 3, 2010 and other liabilities at December 28,
2008 and is offset by a corresponding amount in equity,
representing net unrealized losses included in accumulated other
comprehensive loss. Such amounts will be recognized in the
consolidated income statement over the remainder of the term
ending on May 20, 2010. At January 3, 2010 and
December 28, 2008, accumulated other comprehensive loss, as
reflected in equity, consisted of unrealized losses on
derivatives totaling $0.3 million and $0.8 million,
net of tax, respectively. For the fiscal years ended
January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, a
$0.5 million unrealized gain and $0.8 million
unrealized loss, respectively, was recorded in other
comprehensive loss. There was no hedge ineffectiveness
recognized during the fiscal years ended January 3, 2010
and December 28, 2008.
60
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
9.
Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Credit line borrowings (see Note 8)
|
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
80,000
|
|
Unsecured promissory notes related parties, maturing
February 2010 through November 2010
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
Unsecured promissory notes non-related parties, maturing
March 2010 through May 2010
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
42,448
|
|
|
|
88,249
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
41,236
|
|
|
|
5,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,212
|
|
|
$
|
82,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured promissory notes relate to the Companys purchase
of noncontrolling interests and have interest rates of 65 to
75 basis points over LIBOR. Such notes are classified as
related party for those partners who remain associated with the
Company after the purchase of their interests. Other debt is
presented net of debt discounts and is primarily comprised of
non-interest-bearing promissory notes related to the purchase of
certain of the Companys liquor licenses.
The aggregate annual payments of long-term debt outstanding at
January 3, 2010, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
41,236
|
|
2011
|
|
|
63
|
|
2012
|
|
|
63
|
|
2013
|
|
|
64
|
|
2014
|
|
|
64
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
42,957
|
|
Less: debt discount
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
42,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: The Credit Facility expires on
August 30, 2013. However, the Company intends to repay
total outstanding credit line borrowings of $40.0 million
during fiscal 2010. As such, the aggregate amount due in 2010
shown above includes outstanding credit line borrowings totaling
$40.0 million as of January 3, 2010. Such amount is
included in the current portion of long-term debt on the
consolidated balance sheet as of January 3, 2010.
61
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
The Companys financial assets and financial liabilities
measured at fair value at January 3, 2010 are summarized
below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
Assets/Liabilities
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Valuation
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Technique
|
|
Money Markets
|
|
$
|
54,655
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,655
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
market approach
|
Restoration Plan investments
|
|
|
3,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
market approach
|
Interest rate swap liability
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
income approach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
57,638
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,638
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company invests excess cash in money market funds and
reflects these amounts within cash and cash equivalents on the
consolidated balance sheet at a net value of 1:1 for each dollar
invested. Money market investments held by the Company were
invested primarily in government backed securities at
January 3, 2010.
The Companys Restoration Plan investments are considered
trading securities and are reported at fair value based on third
party broker statements and are reflected within other assets in
the consolidated balance sheet. The realized and unrealized
holding gains and losses related to these investments are
recorded in interest and other income (expense), net in the
consolidated income statements.
The fair value of the Companys interest rate swap is
estimated using the net present value of a series of cash flows
on both the fixed and floating legs of the swap and is reflected
within accrued expenses at January 3, 2010 and other
liabilities at December 28, 2008 in the consolidated
balance sheet. These cash flows are based on yield curves which
take into account the contractual terms of the derivative,
including the period to maturity and market-based parameters
such as interest rates and volatility. The yield curves used in
the valuation model are based on published data for
counterparties with an AA rating. Market practice in pricing
derivatives initially assumes all counterparties have the same
credit quality. The Company mitigates derivative credit risk by
transacting with highly rated counterparties. Management has
evaluated credit and nonperformance risks and believes them to
be insignificant and not warranting a credit adjustment at
January 3, 2010. See Note 8 for a discussion of the
Companys interest rate swap.
The Company leases certain buildings and land which are
considered capital leases and are included in property and
equipment on the consolidated balance sheets. Amortization of
assets under capital leases is included in depreciation and
amortization expense.
Capital lease assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Capital lease assets, gross
|
|
$
|
4,494
|
|
|
$
|
4,494
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(2,507
|
)
|
|
|
(2,278
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease assets, net
|
|
$
|
1,987
|
|
|
$
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The related capital lease obligations are reported within lease
obligations and consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Building
|
|
$
|
2,062
|
|
|
$
|
2,246
|
|
Land
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
3,112
|
|
|
$
|
3,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company leases restaurant facilities and certain real
property as well as equipment under operating leases having
terms expiring between 2010 and 2025. The restaurant facility
and real property leases primarily have renewal clauses of five
to 20 years exercisable at the option of the Company.
Certain renewal terms contain rent escalation clauses
stipulating specific rent increases, some of which are based on
the consumer price index. Additionally, certain leases require
the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of gross
revenues, as defined in the leases.
Rent expense included in occupancy expense in the consolidated
statements of income for operating leases is summarized as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Minimum rent
|
|
$
|
37,215
|
|
|
$
|
35,052
|
|
|
$
|
30,511
|
|
Contingent rent
|
|
|
8,873
|
|
|
|
10,127
|
|
|
|
9,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rent expense
|
|
$
|
46,088
|
|
|
$
|
45,179
|
|
|
$
|
40,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 3, 2010, the Company had signed lease agreements
for unopened restaurants with total minimum lease payment
obligations of $7.1 million. The following table does not
include lease obligations related to renewal option periods even
if it is reasonably assured that the Company will exercise the
related option. Future minimum lease payments under capital and
operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Leases
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
49,635
|
|
|
$
|
50,051
|
|
2011
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
48,774
|
|
|
|
49,190
|
|
2012
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
47,410
|
|
|
|
47,826
|
|
2013
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
44,008
|
|
|
|
44,424
|
|
2014
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
38,833
|
|
|
|
39,249
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
112,754
|
|
|
|
114,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
|
$
|
341,414
|
|
|
$
|
344,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Amount representing interest
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company leases a building and certain furniture and
equipment from a partnership in which the Company owns an
approximate seven percent interest. Annual rent payments are
contingent based on a percentage of gross revenues. The
respective period rent expense is included in the amounts
disclosed above.
63
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
$
|
9,436
|
|
|
$
|
10,399
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
3,653
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
Performance units
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-settled awards
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities
|
|
$
|
18,488
|
|
|
$
|
14,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Derivative liability was reclassified to accrued expenses during
fiscal year 2009 |
|
|
13.
|
Preferred
Stock and PFCB Common Stockholders Equity
|
Preferred
Stock
The board of directors is authorized to issue up to
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the
powers, preferences, privileges, rights, including voting
rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of those
shares without any further vote or act by the common
stockholders. There was no outstanding preferred stock as of
January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008.
Stock
Option Plans
1996 and
1997 Plans
In August 1996, the Company adopted the 1996 Stock Option Plan
(1996 Plan), and in July 1997, the Company adopted
the 1997 Restaurant Management Stock Option Plan (1997
Plan). Options under the 1996 Plan may be granted to
employees, consultants and directors to purchase the
Companys common stock at an exercise price that equals or
exceeds the fair value of such shares on the date such option is
granted. Options under the 1997 Plan may be granted to key
employees of the Company who are actively engaged in the
management and operation of the Companys restaurants to
purchase the Companys common stock at an exercise price
that equals or exceeds the fair value of such shares on the date
such option is granted. Vesting periods are determined at the
discretion of the board of directors, and all options
outstanding at January 3, 2010 vest over five years.
Options may be exercised immediately upon grant, subject to a
right by the Company to repurchase any unvested shares at the
exercise price. Any options granted shall not be exercisable
after ten years. Upon certain changes in control of the Company,
the 1996 and 1997 Plans provide for two additional years of
immediate vesting. The Company had reserved a total of
2,173,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the
1996 and 1997 Plans, all of which have been granted as of
January 3, 2010. No awards were granted during fiscal 2009
under this plan.
1998
Plan
During 1998, the Companys Board of Directors approved the
1998 Stock Option Plan (1998 Plan) which provides
for discretionary grants of incentive stock options and
nonqualified stock options to the Companys employees,
including officers, directors, consultants, advisors, and other
independent contractors. The option exercise price per share for
an incentive stock option and nonstatutory stock option may not
be less than 100 percent of the fair market value of a
share of common stock on the grant date. The Companys
Compensation Committee has the authority to, among other things,
determine the vesting schedule for each option granted. Options
currently outstanding generally vest over five years and all
options expire within 10 years of their date of grant. A
total of
64
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
3,213,770 additional shares of common stock have been reserved
for issuance under the 1998 Plan of which approximately 437,000
were available to be granted as of January 3, 2010. No
awards were granted during fiscal 2009 under this plan.
1999
Plan
During 1999, the Companys Board of Directors approved the
1999 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (1999 Plan),
which provides for discretionary grants of nonqualified stock
options to the Companys employees. The 1999 Plan prohibits
grants to officers or directors. The option exercise price per
share may not be less than 100 percent of the fair market
value of a share of common stock on the grant date. The
Companys Compensation Committee has the authority to,
among other things, determine the vesting schedule for each
option granted. Options currently outstanding generally vest
over five years and all options expire within 10 years of
their date of grant. A total of 800,000 shares of common
stock have been reserved for issuance under the 1999 Plan of
which approximately 80,000 were available to be granted as of
January 3, 2010. No awards were granted during fiscal 2009
under this plan.
2006
Plan
In May 2006, the Companys Board of Directors approved the
2006 Equity Incentive Plan (2006 Plan) which
provides for grants of incentive and nonstatutory stock options
as well as stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, performance units, deferred compensation
awards and other stock-based awards. Awards other than incentive
stock options generally may be granted only to employees,
directors and consultants of the Company, or certain related
entities or designated affiliates. Shares subject to stock
options and stock appreciation rights are charged against the
2006 Plan share reserve on the basis of one share for each one
share granted while shares subject to other types of equity
awards are charged against the 2006 Plan share reserve on the
basis of two shares for each one share granted. The 2006 Plan
also contains other limits with respect to the terms of
different types of incentive awards and with respect to the
number of shares subject to awards that can be granted to an
employee during any fiscal year. Options currently outstanding
generally vest monthly over five years and expire within
10 years of their date of grant. All other types of awards
generally cliff-vest over various years. A total of
1,750,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for
issuance under the 2006 Plan of which approximately 319,000 were
available to be granted as of January 3, 2010. Cash-settled
awards are issued pursuant to the 2006 Plan, however do not
decrease shares available.
Share-Based
Compensation
The Company has granted stock options, cash-settled stock
appreciation rights (SARs) and cash-settled
stock-based awards (restricted cash units or RCUs)
for a fixed number of awards with an exercise price equal to or
greater than the fair value of the awards at the date of grant.
The Company has also granted restricted stock and restricted
stock units (RSUs) with fair value determined based
on the Companys closing stock price on the date of grant.
The Company has also granted performance units whose value will
be determined on the date of vesting. The estimated fair value
of share-based compensation is amortized to expense over the
vesting period.
Equity-Classified
Awards
Option
valuation
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use
in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no
vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition,
option valuation models require the input of subjective
assumptions, including estimating 1) expected term,
2) the Companys common stock price volatility over
the expected term, 3) the number of awards that will
ultimately not vest (forfeitures) and (4) the
weighted average risk-free rate of return. The Companys
outstanding options vest one-fifth after the first year and then
monthly over remaining four years.
65
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value for stock options was estimated at the date of
grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following weighted-average assumptions used for stock option
grants issued under the option plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended(1)
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Weighted average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
Expected life of options (years)
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Expected stock volatility
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
There were no stock options granted during the year ended
January 3, 2010. |
The following table presents information regarding options
granted and exercised (in thousands except weighted average fair
value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
December 28,
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Weighted average fair value of stock options granted
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.89
|
|
|
$
|
14.24
|
|
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised
|
|
$
|
4,386
|
|
|
$
|
590
|
|
|
$
|
13,208
|
|
Tax (shortfall) benefit from share-based compensation
|
|
$
|
1,348
|
|
|
$
|
(491
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,981
|
|
Option
activity
Information regarding activity for stock options outstanding
under the Plans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Exercise
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price (per share)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
3,333,780
|
|
|
$
|
35.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
308,251
|
|
|
|
34.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(439,924
|
)
|
|
|
12.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited (canceled)
|
|
|
(185,299
|
)
|
|
|
43.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 30, 2007
|
|
|
3,016,808
|
|
|
$
|
37.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
10,842
|
|
|
|
31.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(30,732
|
)
|
|
|
9.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited (canceled)
|
|
|
(209,595
|
)
|
|
|
46.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 28, 2008
|
|
|
2,787,323
|
|
|
$
|
37.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(240,754
|
)
|
|
|
12.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited (canceled)
|
|
|
(123,792
|
)
|
|
|
47.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at January 3, 2010
|
|
|
2,422,777
|
|
|
$
|
39.36
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
$
|
11,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at January 3, 2010
|
|
|
2,140,934
|
|
|
$
|
39.68
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
9,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options represents the
closing market price on the last trading day of the quarter less
the exercise price of each option multiplied by the number of
in-the-money
stock options. |
66
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Information regarding options outstanding and exercisable at
January 3, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
Number
|
|
Average
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
$ 1.20 - $10.00
|
|
|
9,746
|
|
|
3.6 years
|
|
$
|
7.18
|
|
|
|
9,746
|
|
|
$
|
7.18
|
|
$10.01 - $15.00
|
|
|
57,500
|
|
|
0.5 years
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
57,500
|
|
|
|
15.00
|
|
$15.01 - $20.00
|
|
|
219,328
|
|
|
1.3 years
|
|
|
18.76
|
|
|
|
219,328
|
|
|
|
18.76
|
|
$20.01 - $25.00
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
|
2.0 years
|
|
|
24.39
|
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
|
|
24.39
|
|
$25.01 - $30.00
|
|
|
7,738
|
|
|
2.7 years
|
|
|
29.03
|
|
|
|
7,738
|
|
|
|
29.03
|
|
$30.01 - $35.00
|
|
|
827,798
|
|
|
5.1 years
|
|
|
31.50
|
|
|
|
623,048
|
|
|
|
31.42
|
|
$35.01 - $40.00
|
|
|
110,614
|
|
|
5.2 years
|
|
|
38.44
|
|
|
|
106,780
|
|
|
|
38.50
|
|
$40.01 - $45.00
|
|
|
339,068
|
|
|
5.0 years
|
|
|
43.69
|
|
|
|
317,817
|
|
|
|
43.72
|
|
$45.01 - $50.00
|
|
|
253,975
|
|
|
4.0 years
|
|
|
46.28
|
|
|
|
241,643
|
|
|
|
46.28
|
|
$50.01 - $59.11
|
|
|
594,942
|
|
|
5.2 years
|
|
|
55.69
|
|
|
|
555,266
|
|
|
|
55.58
|
|
Restricted
stock activity
During the years ended December 28, 2008 and
December 30, 2007, the Company issued restricted stock and
RSUs as permitted under the 2006 Plan. Both restricted stock and
RSUs are charged against the 2006 Plan share reserve on the
basis of two shares for each one share granted. The fair value
of restricted stock and RSUs is determined based on the
Companys closing stock price on the date of grant. The
restricted stock awards vest and become unrestricted three years
after the date of grant. RSUs (which currently have only been
issued to the Board of Directors) vest and become unrestricted
one year after date of grant in accordance with each
Directors elected service term. Share-based compensation
expense is recognized ratably over a three-year service period
for restricted stock and over a one-year service period for RSUs.
Information regarding activity for restricted stock and RSUs
outstanding under the 2006 Plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
Awards and RSUs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
(per share)
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
96,400
|
|
|
$
|
30.46
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
128,922
|
|
|
|
33.84
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited (canceled)
|
|
|
(27,420
|
)
|
|
|
30.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 30, 2007
|
|
|
197,902
|
|
|
$
|
32.59
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
355,231
|
|
|
|
18.26
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited (canceled)
|
|
|
(42,439
|
)
|
|
|
31.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 28, 2008
|
|
|
510,694
|
|
|
$
|
22.72
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(60,780
|
)
|
|
|
30.61
|
|
Forfeited (canceled)
|
|
|
(31,405
|
)
|
|
|
24.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 3, 2010(1)
|
|
|
418,509
|
|
|
$
|
21.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Outstanding includes 15,426 RSUs that vested during fiscal 2009
but have yet not settled. |
67
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2009 totaled
approximately $2.1 million. No shares vested during fiscal
2008 and fiscal 2007.
Liability-Classified
Awards
Performance
Units
During fiscal 2009, the Company awarded 600,000 performance
units to each of the Companys Co-Chief Executive Officers
pursuant to the Companys 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Each
award will vest on January 1, 2012, at which time the value
of such awards, if any, will be determined and paid in cash.
The cash value of the performance units will be equal to the
amount, if any, by which the Companys final average stock
price, as defined in the agreements, exceeds the strike price.
The strike price will be adjusted, either up or down, based on
the percentage change in the Russell 2000 Index during the
performance period, as defined in the agreements, which
approximates three years. The total value of the performance
units is subject to a maximum value of $12.50 per unit. If the
Companys stock appreciation is less than the Russell 2000
Index, the performance units will have no value. In the event of
an executives involuntary separation without cause or a
change in control (as both terms are defined in each Chief
Executive Officers employment agreement) prior to the end
of the performance period, the performance period will end and
the maximum value per unit may be calculated at a reduced
amount. Additionally, if the Companys final average stock
price declines compared to the original strike price, the total
value of the performance units, if any, will be reduced by
50 percent.
The performance units are classified as liability awards and
reported within other liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheet, as they will be cash-settled at the end of the
performance period. The fair value of the performance units is
remeasured at each reporting period until the awards are
settled. At January 3, 2010, the fair value per performance
unit was $6.54 calculated using a Monte-Carlo simulation model
which incorporates the historical performance, volatility and
correlation of the Companys stock price and the Russell
2000 Index. At January 3, 2010, the recorded liability of
the performance units was $2.4 million.
Cash-Settled
Awards
During fiscal 2009, the Company issued cash-settled stock
appreciation rights SARs and RCUs to members of its Board of
Directors. The cash value of the SARs will be based on the
appreciation of the Companys stock price on the date of
settlement compared to the Companys stock price on the
date of grant. The cash value of the RCUs will be based on the
Companys stock price on the date of settlement. At the
election of each applicable director, the settlement date of
RCUs was deferred until the earlier of the date they cease
serving on the Companys Board of Directors or a change in
control of the Company. During fiscal 2009, the Company also
granted RCUs to eligible employees in conjunction with its
annual long-term incentive award grant.
Both SARs and RCUs are classified as liability awards and
reported within other liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheet, as they will be paid in cash on the settlement date. RCUs
granted to eligible employees vest three years after the date of
grant.
The fair value of the SARs and RCUs were estimated using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended(1)
|
|
|
January 3, 2010
|
|
|
RCUs
|
|
SARs
|
|
Weighted average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Expected life of cash-settled awards (years)
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Expected stock volatility
|
|
|
51.5
|
%
|
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
68
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
There were no liability-classified awards granted during the
years ended December 28, 2008 and December 30, 2007 |
The fair value of SARs is equal to the value calculated per the
Black-Scholes model. The fair value of RCUs is equal to the sum
of the value calculated per the Black-Scholes model and the
Companys stock price at the reporting date. The fair value
of SARs and RCUs is remeasured at each reporting period until
the awards are settled. At January 3, 2010, the recorded
liability of cash-settled awards was $1.5 million.
Share-based compensation expense for both performance units and
cash-settled awards is recognized ratably over the service
period with the impact of updated fair value recognized as
cumulative adjustments to share-based compensation expense at
the end of each reporting period.
Information regarding activity for RCUs and SARs outstanding
under the 2006 Plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RCUs
|
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
(per unit)
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
(per unit)
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
162,115
|
|
|
|
50.96
|
|
|
|
13,276
|
|
|
|
14.96
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited (canceled)
|
|
|
(4,645
|
)
|
|
|
50.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 3, 2010
|
|
|
157,470
|
|
|
$
|
50.98
|
|
|
|
13,276
|
|
|
$
|
14.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based
compensation expense
Share-based compensation expense from continuing operations for
equity and liability-classified awards is classified as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Equity-classified awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Labor
|
|
$
|
313
|
|
|
$
|
529
|
|
|
$
|
906
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
7,387
|
|
|
|
9,143
|
|
|
|
9,473
|
|
Liability-classified awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation
|
|
|
11,552
|
|
|
|
9,672
|
|
|
|
10,379
|
|
Less: tax benefit
|
|
|
(3,431
|
)
|
|
|
(2,495
|
)
|
|
|
(2,626
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation, net of tax
|
|
$
|
8,121
|
|
|
$
|
7,177
|
|
|
$
|
7,753
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 28, 2008, share-based
compensation expense includes a non-cash charge of
$1.2 million related to the acceleration of the vesting of
unvested options and the extension of the term of all
outstanding stock options pursuant to a separation agreement
with the former President of Pei Wei Asian Diner, Inc. entered
into in December 2008.
Share-based compensation presented above excludes $43,000 and
$133,000 ($26,000 and $87,000 net of tax), for fiscal years
ended December 28, 2008 and December 30, 2007,
respectively, related to discontinued operations.
69
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
There was no share-based compensation expense recorded in
discontinued operations for the fiscal year ended
January 3, 2010.
Non-Vested
Share-Based Compensation Expense
At January 3, 2010, unrecognized share-based compensation,
net of forfeitures (in thousands) as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-Classified Awards
|
|
|
Liability-Classified Awards(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
RCUs and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
SARs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
2,681
|
|
|
$
|
2,212
|
|
|
$
|
2,723
|
|
|
$
|
2,385
|
|
|
$
|
10,001
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
2,723
|
|
|
|
2,069
|
|
|
|
7,319
|
|
2012
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
2013
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,169
|
|
|
$
|
3,591
|
|
|
$
|
5,446
|
|
|
$
|
5,642
|
|
|
$
|
18,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Liability-classified awards are based on current fair value,
which is updated each reporting period. |
The unrecognized share-based compensation expense shown above
will be recognized over the remaining weighted average vesting
period which is approximately 1.1 years for stock options,
1.4 years for restricted stock, 2.0 years for
performance units and 2.5 years for RCUs and SARs awards.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
During 1998, the Companys Board of Directors approved the
1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Purchase Plan)
and reserved 800,000 shares for issuance thereunder. The
Purchase Plan permits eligible employees to purchase common
stock at a discount, but only through payroll deductions, during
concurrent 24 month offering periods. Each offering period
was originally divided into four consecutive six-month purchase
periods. The price at which stock is purchased under the
Purchase Plan was initially equal to 85 percent of the
lower of the fair market value of the common stock on the first
day of the offering period and the fair market value of the
common stock on the last day of the offering period. The Company
recognized share-based compensation expense for its Purchase
Plan, which totaled $0.2 million for the year ended
December 30, 2007.
In August 2007, the Company modified the terms of its Purchase
Plan such that the price at which stock is purchased is now
equal to 95 percent of the fair market value of the common
stock on the last day of the offering period. As a result of
this change, the Companys Purchase Plan is no longer
considered to be compensatory and therefore, the Company ceased
recognizing share-based compensation expense associated with the
Purchase Plan in August 2007. In November 2009, the Company
further modified the terms of its Purchase Plan such that each
offering period is divided into eight consecutive three-month
purchase periods.
Share
Repurchase Program
Under share repurchase programs authorized by the Companys
Board of Directors, the Company has repurchased a total of
5.1 million shares of its common stock for
$146.0 million at an average price of $28.83 since July
2006. Included in this total are 1.4 million shares of the
Companys common stock repurchased during 2009 for
$39.7 million at an average price of $27.73. The remaining
$0.4 million available under the Companys previous
share repurchase program expired in December 2009.
In December 2009, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a new share repurchase program to repurchase up to
$100.0 million of its outstanding shares of common stock
from time to time in the open market
70
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
or in private transactions at prevailing market prices over the
next two years. The Company intends to use cash on hand to
repurchase shares. The Company did not repurchase any shares
under this authorization during fiscal 2009.
401(k)
Plan
Effective July 1, 1997, the Company adopted a 401(k)
Defined Contribution Benefit Plan (the Plan).
Currently, the Plan covers employees that have completed six
months of service and have attained the age of 21 years
old. The Plan permits participants to contribute to the Plan,
subject to Internal Revenue Code restrictions, and also permits
the Company to make discretionary matching contributions.
Beginning July 1, 2007, the Company began bi-weekly
matching contributions in amounts equal to 25% of the first 6%
of employee compensation contributed, resulting in a maximum
contribution of 1.5% of participating employee compensation per
year (subject to annual dollar maximum limits). Company match
contributions to the Plan commence after one year of service and
a minimum of 1,000 hours worked. Matching contributions vest at
the rate of 20% each year beginning after the employees
first year of service. For the fiscal years ended
January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008 and
December 30, 2007, the Companys matching contribution
expense under the Plan was $0.5 million, $0.6 million
and $0.3 million, respectively.
Restoration
Plan
Effective July 1, 2007, the Company adopted a Restoration
Plan, a nonqualified deferred compensation plan which allows
officers and highly compensated employees with six months of
service to defer receipt of a portion of their compensation and
contribute such amounts to one or more investment funds. The
maximum aggregate amount deferrable under the Restoration Plan
is 75% of base salary and 100% of cash incentive compensation.
The Company makes bi-weekly matching contributions in an amount
equal to 25% of the first 6% of employee compensation
contributed, with a maximum annual Company contribution of 1.5%
of employee compensation per year (subject to annual dollar
maximum limits). Company match contributions to the Restoration
Plan commence after one year of service and a minimum of 1,000
hours worked. Matching contributions vest at the rate of 20%
each year beginning after the employees first year of
service. For the fiscal years ended January 3, 2010,
December 28, 2008 and December 30, 2007, the
Companys matching contribution expense under the
Restoration Plan was $0.2 million, $0.2 million and
$0.1 million, respectively.
Additionally, the Company entered into a rabbi trust agreement
to protect the assets of the Restoration Plan. Each
participants account is comprised of their contribution,
the Companys matching contribution and their share of
earnings or losses in the Restoration Plan. The accounts of the
rabbi trust are reported in the Companys consolidated
financial statements. The Company reports these investments
within other assets and the related obligation within other
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Such amounts
totaled $3.2 million and $1.2 million at
January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, respectively.
The investments are considered trading securities and are
reported at fair value with the realized and unrealized holding
gains and losses related to these investments, as well as the
offsetting compensation expense, recorded in operating income.
|
|
15.
|
Employment
Agreements
|
The Company has executed employment agreements with the
following executive officers: Co-Chief Executive Officers,
Executive Vice-President, and Chief Financial Officer. The term
for the current agreements for the Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer continues through May 28, 2011. The
term for each of the
Co-Chief
Executive Officers continues through January 1, 2012. The
agreements prohibit these officers from competing with P.F.
Changs China Bistro and Pei Wei Asian Diner in the area of
Chinese and Asian food concepts during the term of the
agreements and for one year after termination. The agreements
provide for immediate vesting of unvested stock options, and the
extension of the expiration date to three years, after the
occurrence of certain events. These events include a change in
control of the Company, termination of the executives
employment by the Company without cause or separation of
employment by the executive for good reason (as
defined in the agreements). Should any of these events occur,
the
71
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Company may be required to record an expense based upon the
difference between the original grant price of the options and
the fair value at the modification date for the number of awards
ultimately affected by the modification. As of January 3,
2010, approximately 1.1 million equity-settled awards were
affected by these agreements of which approximately
0.3 million shares were unvested, and approximately
1.2 million liability-settled awards were affected by these
agreements of which approximately 1.2 million awards were
unvested.
In December 2008, the President of Pei Wei Asian Diner, Inc.
resigned his position with the Company and the Company entered
into a separation agreement. According to the terms of the
agreement, the Company paid severance compensation and
accelerated the vesting of approximately 71,000 unvested stock
options and extended the exercise period of all outstanding
stock options. These terms resulted in the recognition of
additional non-cash share-based compensation expense of
$1.2 million and a cash severance payment of
$0.8 million for the year ended December 28, 2008.
|
|
16.
|
Partnership
Structure
|
The Company utilizes a partnership philosophy to facilitate the
development, leadership and operation of its restaurants.
Historically, this philosophy had been embodied in a traditional
legal partnership structure, which included capital
contributions from partners in exchange for an ownership stake
in the profits and losses of the Companys restaurants.
Each partner was required to make a capital contribution in
exchange for their percentage interest in the restaurant or
region the partner managed. The ownership interest purchased by
each partner generally ranged between two and ten percent of the
restaurant or region the partner oversaw. At the end of a
specific term (generally five years), the Company has the right,
but not the obligation, to purchase the noncontrolling interest
in the partners respective restaurant or region at fair
market value. An estimated fair value is determined by reference
to current industry purchase metrics as well as the historical
cash flows or net income of the subject restaurant or region, as
appropriate. The Company has the option to pay the agreed upon
purchase price in cash over a period of time not to exceed five
years.
Effective January 2007 for new store openings, the Bistro began
employing a different structure to achieve the same goal. At the
restaurant level, the Bistros Operating and Culinary
Partners (partners in the philosophical not legal
sense) share in the current profitability of the restaurant as
well as participate in a long-term incentive program that
rewards enhancement of economic value. Due to this change in
partnership structure, individuals participating in the new plan
receive amounts classified as compensation expense rather than a
share of noncontrolling interest. Accordingly, compensation
expense for the Bistros Operating and Culinary Partners is
reflected in the consolidated income statements as labor
expense. Additionally, a similar structure exists for the
Bistros Market Partners, Market Chefs and Regional Vice
Presidents, with related compensation expense reflected as
general and administrative expense in the consolidated income
statements. Partner investment expense has no longer been
recognized for new Bistro restaurant openings since the
beginning of fiscal 2007 as a result of this change; however,
for those partners who are bought out prior to the restaurant
reaching maturity (typically after five years of operation),
partner investment expense includes a reversal of previously
recognized expense for the difference between the fair value of
the partners interest at inception date and the fair value
at the date of repurchase, to the extent that the former is
greater.
The Pei Wei partnership structure was not affected by the
changes at the Bistro and the traditional partnership structure
remains in effect for new Pei Wei restaurant openings.
Beginning fiscal 2009 in accordance with new accounting
guidance, the Company changed the accounting and reporting for
minority interests, such that they have been recharacterized as
noncontrolling interests. See Note 1 Recent Accounting
Literature for further discussion of accounting and reporting
changes.
72
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a summary of partnership activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total number of partners
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Partnership interests purchased during the year
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Purchase price of partnership interests purchased (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
4,710
|
|
|
$
|
9,763
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,710
|
|
|
$
|
12,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense from continuing operations consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Federal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
19,023
|
|
|
$
|
4,258
|
|
|
$
|
5,475
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(3,682
|
)
|
|
|
5,762
|
|
|
|
5,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Federal
|
|
$
|
15,341
|
|
|
$
|
10,020
|
|
|
$
|
11,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
4,166
|
|
|
$
|
1,592
|
|
|
$
|
1,588
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(1,015
|
)
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total State
|
|
$
|
3,151
|
|
|
$
|
2,173
|
|
|
$
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
$
|
18,492
|
|
|
$
|
12,193
|
|
|
$
|
12,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys effective tax rate differs from the federal
statutory rate for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Income tax expense at federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State taxes, net of federal expense
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
FICA tip credit
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)%
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total effective rate
|
|
|
29.7
|
%
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
|
25.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The income tax effects of temporary differences that give rise
to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
$
|
11,560
|
|
|
$
|
9,456
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
5,880
|
|
|
|
2,397
|
|
Goodwill and intangibles
|
|
|
8,770
|
|
|
|
8,855
|
|
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
3,963
|
|
|
|
2,732
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
4,520
|
|
|
|
4,108
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
2,908
|
|
FICA and AMT credit carryforwards
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
State credit carryforwards
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
1,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
42,025
|
|
|
$
|
35,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation on property and equipment
|
|
$
|
39,928
|
|
|
$
|
36,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) before valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
2,097
|
|
|
$
|
(1,809
|
)
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
|
$
|
1,600
|
|
|
$
|
(2,056
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company currently files tax returns on a consolidated basis
in some states and on a stand-alone basis in others. At
January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, the Company had
deferred tax assets totaling $0.9 million and
$0.6 million, respectively, related to state net operating
loss carryforwards in certain states where stand-alone tax
returns are filed. These losses expire over the next five to
20 years. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance to
offset the deferred tax assets for those losses that the Company
does not anticipate being able to utilize prior to their
expiration.
At January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, the Company
took advantage of additional tax deductions available relating
to the exercise of non-qualified stock options and disqualifying
dispositions of incentive stock options. Accordingly, for the
years ended January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, the
Company recorded a $1.7 million and $0.3 million,
respectively, increase to equity with a corresponding reduction
to income tax liability. Additionally, at January 3, 2010
and December 28, 2008, the Company reversed
$0.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of
deferred tax assets related to fully vested cancelled options
for which the Company will not receive a tax benefit. Quarterly
adjustments for the exercise of non-qualified stock options and
disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options may vary
as they relate to the actions of the option holder or
shareholder.
The reserve for uncertain tax positions was $1.2 million
and $1.3 million, respectively, at January 3, 2010 and
December 28, 2008. This balance is the Companys best
estimate of the potential liability for uncertain tax positions.
The decrease in the uncertain tax position reserve was primarily
due to audit assessments that settled during 2009. This decrease
was partially offset by increases to the reserve relating to
current year requirements for asserted and unasserted items, as
well as preliminary audit assessments. Inherent uncertainties
exist in estimates of tax contingencies due to changes in tax
law, both legislated and concluded through the various
jurisdictions tax court systems.
74
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Changes in the Companys reserve for uncertain tax
positions are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
December 28,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
1,259
|
|
|
$
|
1,175
|
|
|
$
|
1,411
|
|
Increases (decreases) attributable to tax positions taken during
prior periods
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Increases attributable to tax positions taken during the current
period
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
|
(402
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
Decreases resulting from a lapse of applicable statutes of
limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
1,216
|
|
|
$
|
1,259
|
|
|
$
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, the
Company had accrued $0.4 million and $0.3 million,
respectively, of interest related to uncertain tax positions.
For the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28,
2008, and December 30, 2007, provision for income tax
includes a $0.1 million expense, a $0.02 million
expense, and a $0.3 million benefit, respectively, related
to interest expense on uncertain tax positions. As of
January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, the Company had
accrued $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively of
penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
Currently, the Company has statutes of limitations open in
various states ranging from the 1999 through 2008 tax years. The
federal statute of limitations is currently open for the 2004
through 2008 tax years.
|
|
18.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Purchase
Obligations
The Company enters into various purchase obligations in the
ordinary course of its business. Those that are binding relate
primarily to commodities contracts and construction for
restaurants planned to open in the near future. At
January 3, 2010, such purchase obligations approximated
$116.1 million and were due within the following
12-month
period.
Litigation
and other
The Company is engaged in various legal actions, which arise in
the ordinary course of its business. The Company is also
currently under examination by various taxing authorities for
years not closed by the statute of limitations. Although there
can be no assurance as to the ultimate disposition of these
matters, it is the opinion of the Companys management,
based upon the information available at this time, that the
outcome of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will
not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations,
liquidity or financial condition of the Company.
Loan
Facility
In August 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with FRC
Balance LLC, d/b/a True Food Kitchen, to provide debt capital
for the early-stage development of True Food Kitchen
restaurants. The agreement provides for up to a
$10.0 million loan facility to develop True Food Kitchen
restaurants and can, under certain conditions, be converted by
P.F. Changs into a majority equity position in True Food
Kitchen. As of January 3, 2010, no borrowings were
outstanding under the loan facility.
75
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Management has evaluated both quantitative and qualitative
factors regarding the terms of the agreement with FRC Balance
LLC, including, but not limited to, voting rights, obligations
to absorb expected losses and rights to receive expected
residual returns. Based on this assessment, management has
determined that the entity does not need to be consolidated
within the Companys financial statements.
The Company operates primarily in the United States food-service
industry and has determined that its reportable segments are
those that are based on the Companys methods of internal
reporting and management structure. The Companys
reportable segments are Bistro and Pei Wei. There were no
material amounts of revenues or transfers among reportable
segments.
The following table presents information about reportable
segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shared Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
and Other
|
|
Bistro
|
|
Pei Wei
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,228,179
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
925,321
|
|
|
$
|
302,724
|
|
Segment profit
|
|
|
149,844
|
|
|
|
(1,671
|
)
|
|
|
123,602
|
|
|
|
27,913
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
49,865
|
|
|
|
2,748
|
|
|
|
36,180
|
|
|
|
10,937
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
74,429
|
|
|
|
1,805
|
|
|
|
54,521
|
|
|
|
18,103
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
652,150
|
|
|
|
20,293
|
|
|
|
522,940
|
|
|
|
108,917
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
6,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,566
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
Fiscal Year 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,198,124
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
919,963
|
|
|
$
|
278,161
|
|
Segment profit
|
|
|
136,163
|
|
|
|
(1,462
|
)
|
|
|
115,880
|
|
|
|
21,745
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
87,178
|
|
|
|
2,450
|
|
|
|
65,546
|
|
|
|
19,182
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
68,711
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
51,091
|
|
|
|
16,158
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
667,363
|
|
|
|
20,478
|
|
|
|
534,224
|
|
|
|
112,661
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
6,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,566
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
Fiscal Year 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,084,193
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
849,743
|
|
|
$
|
234,450
|
|
Segment profit
|
|
|
128,409
|
|
|
|
(1,416
|
)
|
|
|
109,679
|
|
|
|
20,146
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
151,553
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
111,248
|
|
|
|
40,148
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
55,988
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
42,294
|
|
|
|
12,278
|
|
In addition to using consolidated GAAP results in evaluating the
Companys financial results, a primary measure used by
executive management in assessing the performance of existing
restaurant concepts is segment profitability (sometimes referred
to as restaurant operating income). Segment profitability is
defined as income from operations before general and
administrative, preopening and partner investment expenses, but
including a deduction for net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests. Because preopening and partner
investment expenses are associated with expansion of the
Companys business and vary in timing and magnitude, they
make an accurate assessment of ongoing operations more difficult
and are therefore excluded. Additionally, general and
administrative expenses are only included in the Companys
consolidated financial results as these costs relate to support
of both restaurant businesses and are generally not specifically
identifiable to individual restaurant operations. As the
Companys expansion is funded entirely from its ongoing
restaurant operations, segment profitability is one
consideration when determining whether and when to open
additional restaurants.
76
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Information to GAAP
measures (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Segment profit
|
|
$
|
149,844
|
|
|
$
|
136,163
|
|
|
$
|
128,409
|
|
Less: General and administrative
|
|
|
(82,749
|
)
|
|
|
(77,488
|
)
|
|
|
(66,968
|
)
|
Less: Preopening expense
|
|
|
(3,919
|
)
|
|
|
(8,457
|
)
|
|
|
(14,310
|
)
|
Less: Partner investment expense
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
2,012
|
|
Less: Interest & other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(1,637
|
)
|
|
|
(3,362
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
4,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes
|
|
$
|
63,576
|
|
|
$
|
49,143
|
|
|
$
|
53,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Interim
Financial Results (Unaudited)
|
The following tables set forth certain unaudited consolidated
financial information for each of the four quarters in fiscal
2009 and 2008 (in thousands, except per share data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
309,837
|
|
|
$
|
301,360
|
|
|
$
|
290,329
|
|
|
$
|
326,653
|
|
|
$
|
305,917
|
|
|
$
|
301,533
|
|
|
$
|
295,877
|
|
|
$
|
294,797
|
|
Income from continuing operations(1)
|
|
|
13,392
|
|
|
|
12,079
|
|
|
|
6,225
|
|
|
|
11,980
|
|
|
|
9,978
|
|
|
|
9,895
|
|
|
|
7,655
|
|
|
|
7,489
|
|
Net income(2)
|
|
|
13,349
|
|
|
|
11,605
|
|
|
|
6,208
|
|
|
|
12,035
|
|
|
|
9,649
|
|
|
|
9,370
|
|
|
|
2,962
|
|
|
|
5,445
|
|
Basic income from continuing operations per share
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
Basic net income per share
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
Diluted income from continuing operations per share
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
Diluted net income per share
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
23,442
|
|
|
|
23,057
|
|
|
|
22,810
|
|
|
|
22,633
|
|
|
|
23,972
|
|
|
|
23,898
|
|
|
|
23,613
|
|
|
|
23,623
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
23,795
|
|
|
|
23,526
|
|
|
|
23,285
|
|
|
|
23,045
|
|
|
|
24,295
|
|
|
|
24,247
|
|
|
|
23,927
|
|
|
|
23,851
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income from continuing operations refers to income from
continuing operations, net of tax, attributable to PFCB common
stockholders. |
|
(2) |
|
Net income refers to Net income attributable to PFCB common
stockholders. |
In managements opinion, the unaudited quarterly
information shown above has been prepared on the same basis as
the audited consolidated financial statements and includes all
necessary adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments that management considers necessary for a fair
presentation of the unaudited quarterly results when read in
conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and
Notes. The Company believes that
quarter-to-quarter
comparisons of its financial results are not necessarily
indicative of future performance.
77
P.F.
CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash
Dividends
During February 2010, the Board of Directors approved the
initiation of a quarterly variable cash dividend based on the
Companys desire to consistently return excess cash flow to
its shareholders. The amount of the cash dividend will be
computed based on 45% of the Companys quarterly net income
and is expected to total approximately $0.90 per share during
fiscal 2010. Based on seasonal fluctuations in the
Companys quarterly net income, the amount of cash dividend
payments, which are based on a fixed percentage of net income,
may fluctuate between quarters.
Global
Brand Development
During February 2010, the Company signed a development and
licensing agreement with Global Restaurant Concepts, Inc., a
leading casual dining operator in the Philippines, to develop
eight restaurants over the next five years. The first restaurant
is scheduled to open in Manila during the first quarter of
fiscal 2011.
78
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the
Companys reports under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to management,
including our Co-Chief Executive Officers (Co-CEOs)
and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as appropriate,
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In
designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures,
management recognized that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control
objectives, as the Companys controls are designed to do,
and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in
evaluating the risk related to controls and procedures.
In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as of January 3, 2010, an evaluation was performed under
the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including the Co-CEOs and CFO, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our Co-CEOs
and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of January 3, 2010. These conclusions
were communicated to the Audit Committee.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting Our management is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act. Our internal control system is designed
to provide reasonable assurance to the Companys management
and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair
presentation of published financial statements. All internal
control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent
limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be
effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to
financial statement preparation and presentation.
Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2010. In
making its assessment of internal control over financial
reporting, management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the
Treadway Commission in Internal Control
Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, our Co-CEOs
and CFO concluded that our internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of January 3, 2010 based on the
criteria set forth by COSO in Internal Control
Integrated Framework.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has
issued an audit report on the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting. This report appears below.
Change in Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting There were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during our last
fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
79
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc.:
We have audited P.F. Changs China Bistro, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Companys) internal control over
financial reporting as of January 3, 2010 based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of January 3, 2010 based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework, issued by
COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of P.F. Changs China Bistro,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 3, 2010 and
December 28, 2008, and the related consolidated statements
of income, equity, and cash flows for the years ended
January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and
December 30, 2007, and our report dated February 17,
2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements.
(signed) KPMG LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
February 17, 2010
80
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by Item 10 with respect to
Directors and Executive Officers is incorporated by reference
from the information under the captions Directors and
Executive Officers, Board Meetings and
Committees, Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance, and Code of Ethics,
contained in the Companys definitive proxy statement in
connection with the solicitation of proxies for the
Companys 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
April 22, 2010 (the Proxy Statement).
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by
reference from the information under the caption Executive
Compensation and Other Matters contained in the Proxy
Statement.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by
reference from information under the captions Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Equity Compensation Plan Information contained in
the Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by
reference from the information under the caption Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence contained in the Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by
reference from the information under the caption
Independent Auditors Fees and Other Matters,
contained in the Proxy Statement.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
Documents filed as part of this report:
1. The following Financial Statements of the Company are
included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm;
Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 3, 2010 and
December 28, 2008;
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended
January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and
December 30, 2007;
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended
January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and
December 30, 2007;
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and
December 30, 2007;
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2. Schedules to Financial Statements:
All financial statement schedules have been omitted because they
are either inapplicable or the information required is provided
in the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and
Notes thereto, included in Part II, Item 8 of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
81
3. Index to Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description Document
|
|
|
3(i)(1)
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
|
|
3(ii)(2)
|
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws.
|
|
4
|
.1(3)
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
4
|
.2(3)
|
|
Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated
May 1, 1997.
|
|
10
|
.1(3)
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and executive
officers.
|
|
10
|
.2(3)
|
|
1998 Stock Option Plan and forms of agreement thereunder.
|
|
10
|
.3(3)
|
|
1997 Restaurant Manager Stock Option Plan and forms of Agreement
thereunder.
|
|
10
|
.4(3)
|
|
1996 Stock Option Plan and forms of Agreement thereunder.
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Amended and Restated 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
effective November 1, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.13(4)
|
|
1999 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.16(5)
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 11, 2001.
|
|
10
|
.17(6)
|
|
Pei Wei Asian Diner, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.23(7)
|
|
Key Employee Stock Purchase Plan and forms of Agreement
thereunder.
|
|
10
|
.25(8)
|
|
2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
10
|
.26(8)
|
|
Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.27(9)
|
|
2007 Credit Agreement dated August 31, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.28(10)(11)
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between the
Company and Richard L. Federico, as amended, dated May 21,
2008. First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement dated February 18, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.29(10)(11)
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between the
Company and Robert T. Vivian, as amended, dated May 21,
2008. First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement dated February 18, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.30(10)
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between the
Company and Russell Owens, as amended, dated May 21, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.31(10)
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between the
Company and R. Michael Welborn, as amended, dated May 21,
2008.
|
|
10
|
.32(10)
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between the
Company and Mark Mumford, as amended, dated May 21, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan,
effective April 22, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.34(14)
|
|
Separation Agreement between the Company and Russell Owens,
dated December 18, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.35(12)
|
|
First Amendment to 2007 Credit Agreement dated December 31,
2008.
|
|
10
|
.36(12)
|
|
Second Amendment to 2007 Credit Agreement dated June 23,
2009.
|
|
10
|
.37(13)
|
|
Third Amendment to 2007 Credit Agreement dated December 15,
2009.
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 for Richard L. Federico.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 for Robert T. Vivian.
|
|
31
|
.3
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 for Mark D. Mumford.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 for Richard L. Federico.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 for Robert T. Vivian.
|
|
32
|
.3
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 for Mark D. Mumford.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Contract or Compensatory Plan. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated April 25, 2002. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on October 25, 2007. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-59749). |
82
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report
on Form 10-K
dated March 6, 2001. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 10-Q,
dated April 1, 2001. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report
on Form 10-K
dated February 19, 2002. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form S-8
dated January 31, 2005. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
dated May 4, 2006. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 10-Q,
dated October 26, 2007. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on July 23, 2008. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on February 20, 2009. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on July 22, 2009. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on December 17, 2009. |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 10-K
filed on February , 2009. |
83
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, on February 17, 2010.
P.F. CHANGS CHINA BISTRO, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ RICHARD
L. FEDERICO
|
Richard L. Federico
Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer
Robert T. Vivian
Co-Chief Executive Officer
Mark D. Mumford
Chief Financial Officer
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
Know all persons by these presents, that each person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints Richard L.
Federico, Robert T. Vivian and Mark D. Mumford, and each of
them, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for
him or her and in his or her name, place, and stead, in any and
all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Report,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to
be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming that all said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, or any of them or their substitute or substituted, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ KERRII
ANDERSON
Kerrii
Anderson
|
|
Director
|
|
February 17, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ RICHARD
L. FEDERICO
Richard
L. Federico
|
|
Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive
Officer)
|
|
February 17, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ LESLEY
H. HOWE
Lesley
H. HOWE
|
|
Director
|
|
February 17, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ KENNETH
A. MAY
Kenneth
A. May
|
|
Director
|
|
February 17, 2010
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ MARK
D. MUMFORD
Mark
D. Mumford
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
|
February 17, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ M.
ANN RHOADES
M.
Ann Rhoades
|
|
Director
|
|
February 17, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ JAMES
G. SHENNAN, JR.
James
G. Shennan, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
February 17, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ ROBERT
T. VIVIAN
Robert
T. Vivian
|
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive
Officer)
|
|
February 17, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ R.
MICHAEL WELBORN
R.
Michael Welborn
|
|
Executive Vice President and Director
|
|
February 17, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ KENNETH
J. WESSELS
Kenneth
J. Wessels
|
|
Director
|
|
February 17, 2010
|
85
EXHIBIT
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description Document
|
|
|
3(i)(1)
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
|
|
3(ii)(2)
|
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws.
|
|
4
|
.1(3)
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
|
|
4
|
.2(3)
|
|
Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated
May 1, 1997.
|
|
10
|
.1(3)
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and executive
officers.
|
|
10
|
.2(3)
|
|
1998 Stock Option Plan and forms of agreement thereunder.
|
|
10
|
.3(3)
|
|
1997 Restaurant Manager Stock Option Plan and forms of Agreement
thereunder.
|
|
10
|
.4(3)
|
|
1996 Stock Option Plan and forms of Agreement thereunder.
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Amended and Restated 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
effective November 1, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.13(4)
|
|
1999 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.16(5)
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 11, 2001.
|
|
10
|
.17(6)
|
|
Pei Wei Asian Diner, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.23(7)
|
|
Key Employee Stock Purchase Plan and forms of Agreement
thereunder.
|
|
10
|
.25(8)
|
|
2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
10
|
.26(8)
|
|
Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan.
|
|
10
|
.27(9)
|
|
2007 Credit Agreement dated August 31, 2007.
|
|
10
|
.28(10)(11)
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between the
Company and Richard L. Federico, as amended, dated May 21,
2008. First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement dated February 18, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.29(10)(11)
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between the
Company and Robert T. Vivian, as amended, dated May 21,
2008. First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement dated February 18, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.30(10)
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Russell Owens, as
amended, dated May 21, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.31(10)
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and R. Michael Welborn,
as amended, dated May 21, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.32(10)
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Mark Mumford, as
amended, dated May 21, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan,
effective April 22, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Separation Agreement between the Company and Russell Owens,
dated December 18, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.35(12)
|
|
First Amendment to 2007 Credit Agreement dated December 31,
2008.
|
|
10
|
.36(12)
|
|
Second Amendment to 2007 Credit Agreement dated June 23,
2009.
|
|
10
|
.37(13)
|
|
Third Amendment to 2007 Credit Agreement dated December 15,
2009.
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 for Richard L. Federico.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 for Robert T. Vivian.
|
|
31
|
.3
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 for Mark D Mumford.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 for Richard L. Federico.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 for Robert T. Vivian.
|
|
32
|
.3
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 for Mark D Mumford.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Contract or Compensatory Plan. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
dated April 25, 2002. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on October 25, 2007. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-59749). |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report
on Form 10-K
dated March 6, 2001. |
86
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 10-Q,
dated April 1, 2001. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report
on Form 10-K
dated February 19, 2002. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form S-8
dated January 31, 2005. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
dated May 4, 2006. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 10-Q,
dated October 26, 2007. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on July 23, 2008. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on February 20, 2009. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
filed on July 22, 2009. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on December 17, 2009. |
87