PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP.
6065 Parkland Boulevard
Cleveland, Ohio 44124

Notice of 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

 

The 2011 annual meeting of shareholders of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., an Ohio corporation, will be held at The Cleveland Marriott East, 26300 Harvard Road, Warrensville Heights, Ohio 44122, on Thursday, May 26, 2011, at 10 A.M., Cleveland Time. The purposes of the Annual Meeting are:

 

1. To elect three directors to serve until the 2014 annual meeting of shareholders;

 

2. To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2011;

 

3. To re-approve the Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. Annual Cash Bonus Plan;

 

4. To hold an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation;

 

5. To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation; and

 

6. To act on other matters that are properly brought before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments, postponements or continuations thereof.

 

The Board of Directors set March 31, 2011 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. This means that owners of Common Stock at the close of business on that date are entitled to (1) receive notice of the Annual Meeting and (2) vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments, postponements or continuations of the Annual Meeting.

 

You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and urged to mark, sign and return the proxy card in the enclosed envelope, regardless of whether you expect to attend the Annual Meeting. No postage is required if mailed in the United States. Your proxy will not be used if you attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may be asked to present a valid picture identification.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

Robert D. Vilsack
  Secretary & General Counsel

 

April 19, 2011

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 26, 2011: A complete set of proxy materials relating to the Annual Meeting is available on the Internet. These materials, consisting of the Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement, Proxy Card and Annual Report, may be viewed at http://eproxy.pkoh.com.

 

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP.
6065 Parkland Boulevard
Cleveland, Ohio 44124

 

Proxy Statement for

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

To Be Held On May 26, 2011

 

GENERAL INFORMATION

 

The Board of Directors of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., or Board, is furnishing this proxy statement in order to solicit proxies on its behalf to be voted at our 2011 annual meeting of shareholders. The Annual Meeting will be held at The Cleveland Marriott East, 26300 Harvard Road, Warrensville Heights, Ohio 44122 on Thursday, May 26, 2011, at 10 A.M., Cleveland Time, and any and all adjournments, postponements or continuations thereof.

 

Proxy materials are first being mailed to shareholders on or about April 19, 2011. A shareholder giving a proxy may revoke it, without affecting any vote previously taken, by a later appointment received by us prior to the Annual Meeting or by giving notice to us in writing or in open meeting. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not in itself revoke a proxy. Shares represented by properly executed proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting. If a shareholder has specified how the proxy is to be voted with respect to a matter listed on the proxy, it will be voted in accordance with such specifications. If no specification is made, the executed proxy will be voted (1) “FOR” the election of the nominees for directors, (2) “FOR” ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2011, (3) “FOR” the re-approval of the Annual Cash Bonus Plan, (4) “FOR” the resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers, and (5) “EVERY THREE YEARS” with respect to the shareholder advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on named executive officer compensation.

 

The record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting is March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2011, there were issued and outstanding 11,826,020 shares of our Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share. Each share is entitled to one vote on each matter presented at the Annual Meeting. Our Articles of Incorporation do not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors.

 

We are not aware of any matters other than those described in this proxy statement that will be presented to the Annual Meeting for action on the part of the shareholders. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting that applicable law permits proxies to vote on a discretionary basis, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote the shares to which the proxy relates thereon in accordance with their best judgment. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining a quorum.

 

The cost of soliciting proxies, including the charges and expenses incurred by brokerage firms and other persons for the forwarding of proxy materials to the beneficial owners of such shares, will be borne by us. Proxies may be solicited by our officers and employees by letter, by telephone or in person. Such individuals will not be additionally compensated but may be reimbursed by us for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, we have retained Morrow & Co., LLC, 470 West Ave., Stamford, CT 06902, a professional proxy soliciting firm, to assist in the solicitation of proxies and will pay such firm a fee, estimated to be approximately $5,000, plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.

 

PROPOSAL NO. 1

 

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

General

 

The authorized number of directors is presently fixed at nine, divided into three classes of three members. The directors of each class are elected for three-year terms so that the term of office of one class of directors expires at each annual meeting. Proxies may only be voted for the nominees identified in the section entitled “Nominees for Election.”

 

The class of directors to be elected in 2011, who will hold their positions for a term of three years and until the election of their successors, has been fixed at three. Unless otherwise directed, the persons named in the accompanying proxy will vote the proxies received by them (unless authority to vote is withheld) in favor of electing to that class: Kevin R. Greene, A. Malachi Mixon III and Dan T. Moore III, all of whom were previously elected as directors by shareholders. If any nominee is not available at the time of election, the proxy holders may vote in their discretion for a substitute or such vacancy may be filled later by the Board. We have no reason to believe any nominee will be unavailable.

 

During 2010, the Board continued its search for a suitable candidate for a director to fill the remaining vacancy created by the retirement of Lewis E. Hatch, effective with the 2006 annual meeting of shareholders and whose term expired at the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders. In the interim, A. Malachi Mixon III, who had been a member of the class of directors whose term expires at our 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, was elected a member of the class of the Board whose term expires at the Annual Meeting. The Board continues to search for a suitable candidate for the remaining vacancy in the class of directors whose term expires at our 2012 annual meeting of shareholders.

 

Vote Required and Recommendation of the Board

 

The affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares of Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting is required to elect Kevin R. Greene, A. Malachi Mixon III and Dan T. Moore III, as directors to serve until the 2014 annual meeting of shareholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect with respect to the election of directors.

 

YOUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” KEVIN R. GREENE, A. MALACHI MIXON III AND DAN T. MOORE III.

Biographical Information

 

Information is set forth below regarding the nominees for election and the directors who will continue in office as directors after the Annual Meeting. The information includes their ages, principal occupations during at least the past five years and other directorships held currently or within the last five years. Also set forth is the date each was first elected as a director.

 

Also contained in the biographical information below are the qualifications that led the Board to conclude that each director and nominee should serve as a director. Each director and nominee possesses the integrity, judgment and analytical ability to guide the Company. The aforementioned qualities, when viewed in tandem with the attributes and accomplishments of each director and nominee, as reflected below, qualify each director and nominee to serve on the Board.

 

 

 

 (a) Member, Executive Committee

 (b) Member, Audit Committee

 (c) Member, Compensation Committee

 (d) Member, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

 

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to beneficial ownership of our Common Stock by: (i) each person (or group of affiliated persons) known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our outstanding Common Stock; (ii) each director or director nominee; (iii) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 25 of this proxy statement individually; and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the information is as of March 31, 2011, and the nature of beneficial ownership consists of sole voting and investment power.

 

 

 

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, requires our officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our Common Stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of such securities with the SEC. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners are required by applicable regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

 

Based upon our review of the copies of Section 16(a) forms received by us, and upon written representations from reporting persons concerning the necessity of filing a Form 5, we believe that, during 2010, all filing requirements applicable for reporting persons were met, with the exception of Mr. Edward Crawford who filed: Forms 4 on February 3, 2011 reporting the sale of 31,040 shares on November 15, 2010, the sale of 13,948 shares on November 19, 2010, the sale of 14,947 shares on November 23, 2010, and the sale of 2,241 shares on November 24, 2010, respectively; Mr. Matthew Crawford who filed: a Form 4 on June 10, 2010 reporting the sale of 22,260 shares on May 10, 2010 and a Form 4 on November 29, 2010 reporting the sale of 3,529 shares on November 19, 2010; Ms. Romney who filed a Form 4 on January 24, 2011 reporting the sale of 2,500 shares on November 29, 2010; Mr. Rutherford who filed a Form 5 on August 23, 2010 reporting the gifting of 1,875 shares on October 9, 2009 and filed a Form 4/A on January 24, 2011 reporting the payment of a tax liability by the delivery of 590 shares on August 19, 2010; and Mr. Wert who filed a Form 4 on February 15, 2011 reporting the purchase of 2,500 shares on March 17, 2009 and the purchase of 2,500 shares on March 18, 2009.

 

CERTAIN MATTERS PERTAINING TO THE BOARD AND
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Corporate Governance

 

Director Independence.  The Board believes that there should be a substantial majority of independent directors on the Board. The Board also believes that it is useful and appropriate to have members of management, including the Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and President, as directors. The current Board members include six independent directors (including all three nominees).

 

Each of Messrs. Auletta, Greene, Mixon, Moore, and Wert and Ms. Romney is “independent” in accordance with the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The Nasdaq Stock Market’s independence definition includes a series of objective tests, including that the director is not our employee and has not engaged in various types of business dealings with us. In addition, as further required by the Nasdaq Stock Market’s rules, the Board has made a subjective determination as to each independent director that no relationships exist that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In making these determinations, the Board reviewed and discussed information provided by the directors and the Company with regard to each director’s business and personal activities as they may relate to the Company and management.

 

In addition, as required by the Nasdaq Stock Market’s rules, the members of the Audit Committee are each “independent” under special standards established by the SEC for members of audit committees. The Audit Committee also includes at least one independent member whom the Board has determined meets the qualifications of an “audit committee financial expert” in accordance with SEC rules. Mr. Auletta is the independent director who has been determined to be an audit committee financial expert. Shareholders should understand that this designation is a disclosure requirement of the SEC related to Mr. Auletta’s experience and understanding with respect to certain accounting and auditing matters. The designation does not impose upon Mr. Auletta any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than are generally imposed on him as a member of the Audit Committee and the Board, and his designation as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this SEC requirement does not affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the Audit Committee or the Board.

 

Risk Oversight.  The Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s risk, with reviews of certain areas being conducted by the relevant committees of the Board and directly through senior management reports.

 

The Audit Committee oversees our risk policies and processes relating to the financial statements and financial reporting processes, as well as internal controls and compliance, and the guidelines, policies and processes for monitoring and mitigating those risks. The Compensation Committee assesses and monitors risks relating to our executive compensation policies and practices. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks related to our governance structure and processes, the independence of the Board and potential conflicts of interest and ensuring compliance with the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire Board is regularly informed through committee reports about such risks.

 

In addition, the Board’s role in our risk oversight process includes receiving regular reports either directly from presentations to the Board by senior or regional management or through executive officers at Board meetings on areas of material risk to us, including market-specific, operational, legal, regulatory, competitive and strategic risks.

 

The procedures described above permit the Board to maintain an awareness of material risks that may affect us and ensure the ability of the Board to take any and all appropriate actions to oversee risks we face. We also believe that our board leadership structure complements our risk management structure, as it allows our independent directors, through the independent committees, to exercise effective oversight of the actions of management in identifying risks and implementing effective risk management policies and controls.

 

Leadership Structure.  Our CEO, Mr. Edward Crawford, also serves as our Chairman. The Company has no fixed policy on whether the roles of Chairman and CEO should be separate or combined; this decision is based on the best interests of the Company considering the circumstances at the time. The Board believes that the combined role of Chairman and CEO promotes strategic development and execution of our business strategies, which is

essential to effective governance. The Board recognizes utilizing the expertise of Mr. Edward Crawford contributes to the success of the Company. The diversity of our operating units requires a leader who possesses the detailed and in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities and challenges facing those diverse businesses. At this time, the Board believes that Mr. Edward Crawford, based upon his experience in the various industries in which we are positioned, is best qualified to efficiently develop agendas that ensure that the Board’s time and attention are focused on the most critical matters and to execute strategic plans effectively.

 

The Board has chosen not to appoint a “lead director,” but instead uses executive sessions of the independent directors, as necessary, and other than the Executive Committee, the composition of the remaining committees of the Board is comprised solely of independent directors. We believe that shared leadership responsibility among the independent directors, as opposed to a single lead director, results in increased engagement of the Board as a whole, and that having a strong, independent group of directors fully engaged is important for good governance.

 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.  All directors, officers and employees must act ethically at all times and in accordance with the policies comprising our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, or Code. A copy of the Code is available, without charge, upon written request to: Secretary, Park-Ohio Holdings Corp., 6065 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124 and is also available on our website at www.pkoh.com. We intend to disclose any amendment to, or waiver from, the Code by posting such amendment or waiver, as applicable, on our website.

 

Board of Directors and Committees

 

Board Committees.  The Board currently has, and appoints the members of, Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Executive Committees. Each member of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees is an independent director in accordance with the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.

 

Audit Committee.  The Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Auletta, Greene and Wert, with Mr. Auletta as its chair. The Audit Committee assists the Board in its general oversight of our financial reporting, internal controls and audit functions, and is directly responsible for the retention, compensation and oversight of the work of our independent auditors. In 2010, the Audit Committee held six meetings. The Audit Committee has a written charter approved by the Board. The responsibilities and activities of the Audit Committee are described in greater detail in the Audit Committee Charter, which is available on our website at www.pkoh.com.

 

Compensation Committee.  The Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Wert and Moore and Ms. Romney, with Ms. Romney as its chair. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves salaries, performance-based incentives and other matters relating to executive compensation, including reviewing and granting equity awards to executive officers. As described in greater detail below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Compensation Committee determines the compensation of our executive officers, including our CEO, and directors. With respect to executive officers other than the CEO, the Compensation Committee takes into account the recommendations of the CEO when determining the various elements of their compensation, including the amount and form of such compensation. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate compensation consultants to assist in the evaluation of executive compensation and the sole authority to approve the fees and other retention terms of any such consultants.

 

The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves various other compensation policies and matters. The Compensation Committee held one meeting in 2010 and also acted by written consent. The Compensation Committee has not yet adopted a written charter.

 

Executive Committee.  The Executive Committee consists of Messrs. Auletta, Edward Crawford and Wert, with Mr. Wert as its chair. The Executive Committee may exercise the authority of the Board between Board meetings, except to the extent that the Board has delegated authority to another committee or to other persons and except as limited by Ohio law and our Regulations. The Executive Committee held no meetings in 2010.

 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Messrs. Auletta, Greene, Mixon, Moore and Wert and Ms. Romney, with Mr. Wert as its chair, and consists of all of our independent directors, in accordance with the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee makes recommendations to the Board regarding the size and

composition of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing with the Board from time to time the appropriate skills and characteristics required of Board members in the context of the current size and make-up of the Board. This assessment includes issues of diversity in numerous factors such as: age; understanding of and achievements in manufacturing, technology, finance and marketing; and international experience and culture. These factors, and any other qualifications considered useful by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, are reviewed in the context of an assessment of the perceived needs of the Board at a particular point in time. As a result, the priorities and emphasis of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and of the Board may change from time to time to take into account changes in business and other trends and the portfolio of skills and experience of current and prospective Board members. Therefore, while focused on the achievement and the ability of potential candidates to make a positive contribution with respect to such factors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not established any specific minimum criteria or qualifications that a nominee must possess. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee establishes procedures for the nomination process, recommends candidates for election to the Board and also nominates officers for election by the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not yet adopted a written charter but operates under a resolution regarding the nomination process.

 

Consideration of new Board nominee candidates typically involves a series of internal discussions, review of information concerning candidates and interviews with selected candidates. In general, candidates for nomination to the Board are suggested by Board members or by employees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates proposed by shareholders and evaluates these candidates proposed by shareholders using the same criteria as for other candidates. Any shareholder nominations proposed for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee should include (1) complete information as to the identity and qualifications of the proposed nominee, including name, address, present and prior business and/or professional affiliations, education and experience and particular fields of expertise, (2) an indication of the nominee’s consent to serve as a director if elected, and (3) the reasons why, in the opinion of the recommending shareholder, the proposed nominee is qualified and suited to be a director, and should be addressed to our Secretary at 6065 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and reports to the Board on a periodic basis with regard to matters of corporate governance. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also reviews and assesses the effectiveness of the Code and recommends to the Board proposed revisions to the Code. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews shareholder proposals and makes recommendations to the Board for action on such proposals. The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met twice and acted by written consent in 2010.

 

Attendance at Board, Committee and Annual Shareholders’ Meetings.  The Board held five meetings in 2010. All directors are expected to attend each meeting of the Board and the committees on which he or she serves. In 2010, no director attended less than 75% of the meetings of the Board and the committees on which he or she served. Directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting, and all directors except for Mr. Mixon who could not attend due to health reasons, attended the 2010 annual meeting of shareholders.

 

Shareholder Communications

 

The Board believes that it is important for shareholders to have a process to send communications to the Board. Accordingly, shareholders who wish to communicate with the Board or a particular director may do so by sending a letter to our Secretary at 6065 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124. The mailing envelope must contain a clear notation indicating that the enclosed letter is a “Shareholder-Board Communication” or “Shareholder-Director Communication.” All such letters must identify the author as a shareholder and clearly state whether the intended recipients are all members of the Board or certain specified individual directors. The Secretary will make copies of all such letters and circulate them to the appropriate director or directors.

Company Affiliations with the Board

 

Mr. Mixon currently serves as the executive Chairman of the Board of Invacare Corporation. In the ordinary course of business, we sell parts to Invacare Corporation and its subsidiaries. Total sales to Invacare Corporation during 2010 were approximately $7.6 million.

 

In concluding the independence of Mr. Mixon, the Board determined that since the sales were made in the ordinary course of business and that the sales did not constitute a material portion of our total net sales, the sales transactions did not create a material relationship or impair the independence of Mr. Mixon.

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

Members of the Compensation Committee during 2010 were Messrs. Moore and Wert and Ms. Romney. No current or former officer or employee of ours served on the Compensation Committee during 2010.

 

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

 

We compensate non-employee directors for serving on our Board and reimburse them for expenses incurred in connection with Board and committee meetings. During 2010, each non-employee director earned, as an annual retainer, $20,000 and was granted 2,500 restricted shares. The restricted shares were granted in accordance with our Amended and Restated 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the 1998 Plan. The non-employee directors also received $4,000 for each Board meeting attended in-person or $1,000 for each Board meeting attended telephonically, and $1,000 for each committee meeting attended. The Compensation, Audit, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairpersons each received a $5,000 committee retainer fee.

 

 

 

 

In 2009, we established a 2009 Director Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan, or Director DC Plan, which is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for our directors. Under the Director DC Plan, eligible directors can defer up to 100% of their cash retainer, attendance fees, and/or restricted share units for pre-tax savings opportunities. The investment options available to the eligible directors are the same investment options offered under our 401(k) Plan. Eligible directors’ contributions and earnings are always 100% vested. Distributions under the Director DC Plan may be made only upon a Separation of Service (as defined in the Director DC Plan). Distributions are paid in a lump sum or in annual installments over a maximum of 10 years. We do not pay above-market interest rates or provide preferential earnings.

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

Audit Committee Report

 

The Audit Committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of financial statements. The Audit Committee selects our independent auditors. The Audit Committee is composed of three directors, each of whom is independent as defined under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market and SEC rules. Currently, the Audit Committee is composed of Messrs. Auletta, Greene and Wert. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board.

 

Management is responsible for our internal controls and financial reporting process. The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States and to issue a report thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.

 

In connection with these responsibilities, the Audit Committee met with management and Ernst & Young LLP to review and discuss the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010. The Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of our accounting principles and such other matters as are required by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 114 (Auditor’s Communication With Those Charged With Governance), as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountants communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence from management and has considered the compatibility of non-audit services with the auditors’ independence.

 

The Audit Committee meets with the internal and independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the overall scope and plans for their respective audits, the results of audit examinations, their evaluations of our internal controls, and the overall quality of our financial reporting.

 

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

 

Patrick V. Auletta, Chair

Kevin R. Greene

James W. Wert

 

PROPOSAL NO. 2

 

 

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

The Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP our independent auditors to examine our financial statements and those of our subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011. During fiscal year 2010, Ernst & Young LLP examined our financial statements and those of our subsidiaries, including those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. The Board recommends ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.

 

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and have an opportunity to make a statement at the Annual Meeting, if they so desire, and will be available to respond to appropriate shareholders’ questions.

 

Vote Required and Recommendation of the Board

 

Although shareholder approval of this appointment is not required by law or binding on the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee believes that shareholders should be given the opportunity to express their views. If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors, the Audit Committee will consider this vote in determining whether or not to continue the engagement of Ernst & Young LLP. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.

 

YOUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THIS APPOINTMENT.

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FEE INFORMATION

 

The following table presents fees for services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP in each of the last two fiscal years:

 

 

Audit fees included fees associated with the annual audit, the reviews of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, statutory audits required internationally and the audit of management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Audit-related fees principally included fees in connection with pension plan audits and accounting consultations. Tax fees included fees in connection with tax compliance and tax planning services.

 

Pre-approval policy

 

The Audit Committee has adopted a formal policy on auditor independence requiring the approval by the Audit Committee of all professional services rendered by our independent auditor prior to the commencement of the specified services.

 

All of the services described in “Audit-Related Fees,” “Tax Fees,” and “All Other Fees” were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with the Audit Committee’s formal policy on auditor independence.

 

PROPOSAL NO. 3

 

RE-APPROVAL OF THE PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP. ANNUAL CASH BONUS PLAN

 

You are being asked to re-approve the Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. Annual Cash Bonus Plan, which we refer to as the Bonus Plan. The Bonus Plan was initially approved by our shareholders in May 2006. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 requires that certain executive compensation plans be re-approved by the shareholders every five years in order to continue qualification of compensation awarded under such plans as performance-based compensation pursuant to Section 162(m). Accordingly, we are seeking shareholders’ re-approval of the Bonus Plan in order for all bonus payments made under the Bonus Plan to continue to satisfy the requirements for qualified performance-based compensation under the Internal Revenue Service’s regulations under Section 162(m) and, accordingly, to be eligible for deductibility by the Company.

 

Summary of the Bonus Plan

 

The purpose of the Bonus Plan is to attract and retain key executives for the Company and its subsidiaries and to provide such persons with incentives for superior performance. A summary of the terms of the Bonus Plan is set forth below. The full text of the Bonus Plan is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A, and the summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to Appendix A.

 

Administration.  The Bonus Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee or any other committee appointed by the Board to administer the Bonus Plan (consisting of at least two directors, each of whom must be an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m)). In administering the Bonus Plan, the Compensation Committee shall have full power and authority to interpret and administer the Bonus Plan and shall have the exclusive right to establish Management Objectives (as defined below) and the amount of incentive bonuses payable upon achievement of such objectives.

 

Eligible Executive.  Participation in the Bonus Plan will be limited to an “Eligible Executive,” which is defined as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and any other executive officer of the Company designated by the Compensation Committee.

 

Management Objectives.  An Eligible Executive’s right to receive a bonus under the Bonus Plan depends on achievement of certain specified performance goals, referred to as Management Objectives. Management Objectives may be described in terms of Company-wide objectives or objectives that are related to the performance of the individual Eligible Executive or of the subsidiary, division, department or function within the Company or subsidiary in which the Eligible Executive is employed. Management Objectives may be measured on a relative or absolute basis. The Management Objectives shall be limited to specified levels of, growth in or relative peer company performance in one or more or a combination of the following: earnings per share; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization; earnings before interest and taxes; earnings before taxes; return on invested capital; return on total capital; return on assets; return on equity; total shareholder return; net income; revenue; cash flow or operating profit; and productivity improvement.

 

Awards.  Not later than the 90th day of each fiscal year of the Company, the Compensation Committee shall establish the Management Objectives for each Eligible Executive and the amount of incentive bonus payable (or formula for determining such amount) upon full achievement of the specified Management Objectives. The Compensation Committee may further specify in respect of the specified Management Objectives a minimum acceptable level of achievement below which no incentive bonus payment will be made and shall set forth a formula for determining the amount of any payment to be made if performance is at or above the minimum acceptable level but falls short of full achievement of the specified Management Objectives. The Compensation Committee may not modify any terms of awards established, except to the extent that after such modification the incentive bonus would continue to constitute qualified “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.

 

The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to reduce the amount of any incentive bonus that would be otherwise payable to an Eligible Executive (including a reduction in such amount to zero).

 

Notwithstanding any other provision of the Bonus Plan to the contrary, in no event shall the incentive bonus paid to an Eligible Executive under the Bonus Plan for a year exceed $3.0 million.

Committee Certification.  As soon as practicable after the end of each fiscal year of the Company, the Compensation Committee shall determine whether the Management Objective has been achieved and the amount of the incentive bonus to be paid to each Eligible Executive for such fiscal year and shall certify such determinations in writing.

 

Effective Date.  Subject to its re-approval by the shareholders, the Bonus Plan shall become effective May 26, 2011, and shall remain effective until the first shareholders’ meeting in 2016, subject to any further shareholder approvals (or re-approvals) mandated for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. The Board, however, may terminate the Bonus Plan, on a prospective basis only, at any time.

 

Bonus Plan Benefits.  Since the Bonus Plan affords the Compensation Committee discretion in establishing target bonuses (subject to the $3.0 million annual limit per person noted above), it is not possible to determine the amount of the benefits that may become payable under the Bonus Plan. If the Bonus Plan is not approved by shareholders, no bonuses will be paid under such plan.

 

Federal Income Tax Consequences

 

Under present federal income tax law, a Bonus Plan participant will be taxed at ordinary income rates on the amount of any payment received pursuant to the Bonus Plan. Generally, and subject to the provisions of Section 162(m), the Company will receive a federal income tax deduction corresponding to the amount of income recognized by a Bonus Plan participant.

 

Vote Required and Recommendation of the Board

 

Your Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company to qualify performance-based compensation for deductibility under Section 162(m) in order to maximize the Company’s income tax deductions. The re-approval of the Bonus Plan is necessary to qualify performance-based compensation for such deductibility.

 

The affirmative vote of a majority of our shares of Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal is required to approve the Bonus Plan. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against and broker non-votes will have no effect, with respect to the approval of this proposal.

 

YOUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RE-APPROVAL OF THE BONUS PLAN.

 

PROPOSAL NO. 4

 

ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

 

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, shareholders have an opportunity to cast a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to SEC rules.

 

Our compensation philosophy is designed to align each executive’s compensation with our short-and long-term performance and to provide the compensation and incentives needed to attract, motivate, reward, and retain key executives who are crucial to achieving our business goals and who will build long-term economic value for us. We seek to provide an executive compensation package that is tied to our overall financial performance and that aligns executive and shareholder interests. Our executive compensation decisions demonstrate our commitment to those goals. This link between incentive compensation and achievement of business goals and shareholder value helped drive our strong performance in 2010.

 

Our executive compensation is discussed in further detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, which discusses how our compensation policies and procedures implement our compensation philosophy.

 

The Compensation Committee and our Board believe these policies and procedures are effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and in achieving its goals.

 

We are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. Accordingly, we ask our shareholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

 

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to SEC rules, and the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosures in this proxy statement.”

 

The say-on-pay vote is advisory and, therefore, not binding; however, the Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of the vote when considering future named executive officer compensation.

 

Vote Required and Recommendation of the Board

 

The affirmative vote of a majority of our shares of Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on this proposal is required for the approval of the named executive officer compensation. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote against and broker non-votes will have no effect, with respect to the approval of this proposal.

 

YOUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

 

PROPOSAL NO. 5

 

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF THE ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

 

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, shareholders have an opportunity to cast a non-binding advisory vote on how frequently we should seek an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers. Shareholders may indicate whether they would prefer an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation once every year, two years, or three years. Alternatively, shareholders may abstain from casting a vote.

 

The Board believes it is most appropriate to conduct an advisory vote on named executive officer compensation once every three years and, therefore, the Board recommends that you vote for a three-year interval for the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation.

 

Our executive compensation program is designed to achieve a balance of short-term and long-term goals. To this end, the Compensation Committee combines potential annual cash incentive awards with long-term equity awards, which generally vest over a three-year period, and with value based on the price of our Common Stock. The Board believes that holding the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation once every three years will encourage a reasonably long-term focus on our executive compensation policies and practices.

 

When you vote, you may cast your vote on your preferred voting frequency by choosing among the following four options: once every one year, two years or three years, or you may abstain from voting.

 

Although this advisory vote is not binding, the Board will consider our shareholders’ preferences and may take them into account in making future determinations concerning the frequency of advisory votes on our named executive officer compensation.

 

Vote Required and Recommendation of the Board

 

As an advisory vote, the option of once every year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by shareholders is expected to be the frequency for the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation that has been selected by shareholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect with respect to this proposal.

 

YOUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EVERY “THREE YEARS” REGARDING THE FREQUENCY OF THE SHAREHOLDER ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION.

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Executive Summary

 

2010 Performance

 

Fiscal 2010 was a year of significant achievement for us and our financial performance was substantially improved over 2009. In summary:

 

 

Philosophy and Objectives

 

Our compensation program is designed to recognize the level of responsibility of an executive within our Company, taking into account the named executive officer’s role and expected leadership within our organization, and to encourage decisions and actions that have a positive impact on our overall performance.

 

Our compensation philosophy is based upon the following objectives:

 

 

Overview

 

The Compensation Committee administers our compensation program. The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving base salaries, bonuses and equity incentive awards for all named executive officers. Typically, our CEO makes compensation recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to decisions concerning named executive officers other than himself. With respect to our CEO, the Compensation Committee makes its decisions in executive session. Our compensation program recognizes the importance of ensuring that discretion is provided to the Compensation Committee and CEO in determining compensation levels and awards.

 

Compensation Consultants

 

The Compensation Committee has engaged compensation consultants on a periodic basis to help evaluate our compensation program and to help select appropriate market data for compensation and benchmarking. The Compensation Committee also may consider a variety of data sources and information related to market practices

for companies similar to ours. A comprehensive review was conducted by Towers Watson in 2006. We have in the past used, and continue to use, Towers Watson for actuarial-related services in connection with our retirement plans.

 

In the past, the Compensation Committee has considered medians for total compensation from the market survey and peer group data from the 2006 Towers Watson review for comparable positions in determining the base salary, bonus, equity components, and benefit package for our CEO and our President and Chief Operating Officer, or COO. However, actual compensation can and does vary widely, either above or below these medians, based on Company and individual performance, scope of responsibilities, competencies and experience. For 2010, the Compensation Committee did not consider the Towers Watson market survey or peer group data in making its compensation decisions for our CEO and COO.

 

In January 2011, the Compensation Committee engaged the services of Pearl Meyer & Partners (PM&P), a leading independent provider of executive compensation consulting services, to evaluate our executive compensation program and help select appropriate market data for compensation and benchmarking. For 2010, the Compensation Committee did not consider the PM&P market survey or peer group data in making its compensation decisions for our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee considers many factors in exercising its judgment and discretion in making compensation decisions. Other factors the Compensation Committee considers when making individual compensation decisions are described under “Compensation Components” below.

 

The Compensation Committee believes that the foregoing actions are consistent with our philosophy and objectives.

 

Compensation Components

 

Our compensation program has three primary components consisting of a base salary, an annual cash bonus, whether discretionary or pursuant to our Bonus Plan, and equity awards granted pursuant to our 1998 Plan. In addition, we also offer our named executive officers basic retirement savings opportunities, participation in a deferred compensation plan, health and welfare benefits and perquisites that supplement the three primary components of compensation. Beginning in 2008, our compensation program included a non-qualified defined benefit plan, or DB Plan, and a non-qualified defined contribution plan, or DC Plan, for our CEO.

 

We view these various components of compensation as related but distinct. Although our Compensation Committee does review total compensation, we do not believe that significant compensation derived from one component of compensation should negate or reduce compensation from other components. The appropriate level for each compensation component is based in part, but not entirely, on our view of internal equity and consistency, and other considerations we deem relevant, such as rewarding extraordinary performance. Our Compensation Committee has not adopted any formal or informal policies or guidelines for allocating compensation between long-term and currently paid-out compensation, between cash and non-cash compensation or among different forms of non-cash compensation.

 

Base Salary

 

We pay base salaries to recognize each named executive officer’s unique value and skills, competencies and experience in light of the executive’s position. Base salaries, including any annual or other adjustments, for our named executive officers, other than our CEO, are determined after taking into account recommendations by our CEO. Base salaries for all named executive officers are determined by the Compensation Committee after considering a variety of factors such as a subjective assessment of the nature and scope of the named executive officer’s position, the named executive officer’s unique value and historical contributions, historical increases, internal equitable considerations, and the experience and length of service of the named executive officer.

 

For 2009, the Compensation Committee, after considering recommendations from our CEO, and after taking into account economic and business conditions and our financial performance, reduced our named executive officers’ 2008 base salaries by 10% commencing March 1, 2009.

 

Effective April 1, 2010, the Compensation Committee, after considering recommendations from our CEO, and after taking into account improved economic and business conditions, and our financial performance, reinstated our

named executive officers’ 2008 salary levels (Messrs. Edward Crawford, $750,000; Rutherford, $340,000; Matthew Crawford, $400,000; Vilsack, $260,000; and Fogarty $240,000).

 

Annual Bonus

 

Annual bonuses are used to reward our named executive officers for achieving key financial and operational objectives, to motivate certain desired individual behaviors and to reward superior individual achievements. Bonus awards for our named executive officers, other than for our CEO, are determined by the Compensation Committee after taking into account recommendations by our CEO. The annual bonus awards, other than for our CEO, are fully discretionary and are based on subjective criteria, which may include:

 

 

We have established the Bonus Plan, which was approved by our shareholders in 2006, and for which we are seeking re-approval at the Annual Meeting, for our CEO and any other named executive officer selected by the Compensation Committee to participate in the Bonus Plan. The Bonus Plan includes a set of performance measures that can be used to establish the bonus award. Under the Bonus Plan, our CEO or any other selected named executive officer is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus depending on the performance of our Company against specific performance measures established by the Compensation Committee before the end of the first quarter of each year. For 2010, only our CEO participated in the Bonus Plan, and the Compensation Committee determined that our CEO was entitled to a bonus award equal to 4% of our consolidated adjusted income before income taxes (adjusted for extraordinary gains and losses). The Compensation Committee believes income before income taxes, as adjusted, is an appropriate measure of our core operating performance, and directly links our CEO’s annual bonus award to our profitability. Under the Bonus Plan, the Compensation Committee is authorized to exercise negative discretion and reduce our CEO’s award, but did not do so for 2010.

 

For our other named executive officers, the 2010 bonus awards were determined by the Compensation Committee, after considering recommendations from our CEO, and after taking into account individual performance and our profitability. Information about bonuses paid to our named executive officers is contained in the “Summary Compensation Table”.

 

The Compensation Committee has established that the performance measure for our CEO under the Bonus Plan for 2011 will continue to be 4% of our consolidated adjusted income before income taxes (adjusted for special charges).

 

Equity Compensation

 

We use the grant of equity awards under our 1998 Plan to provide long-term incentive compensation opportunities, intended to align the named executive officers’ interests with those of our shareholders, and to attract and retain executive officers.

 

Our Compensation Committee administers our 1998 Plan. Historically, the Compensation Committee has granted options and restricted shares under our 1998 Plan, but awards also can be made in the form of performance shares, restricted share units, or performance units, stock appreciation rights and stock awards. There is no set formula for the granting of equity awards to named executive officers. Other than for grants of equity awards to our CEO, the Compensation Committee typically considers recommendations from our CEO when considering decisions regarding the grant of equity awards to named executive officers. The Compensation Committee grants equity awards based on its subjective judgment and discretion, and may consider a number of criteria, including the relative rank of the named executive officer, total compensation levels, and the named executive officer’s historical and ongoing contributions to our success based on subjective criteria. Because the Compensation Committee and the CEO in their discretion may consider such factors as they deem relevant in determining the named executive officer’s overall equity award, other factors may cause the award in any given year to differ from historical amounts.

We do not have any program, plan or obligation that requires us to grant equity awards on specific dates. We have not made equity grants in connection with the release or withholding of material, non-public information. Options granted under our 1998 Plan have exercise prices equal to the closing market price of our Common Stock on the day of the grant.

 

For 2010, no equity award was made to our CEO. The Compensation Committee approved restricted share awards for Messrs. Matthew Crawford, Rutherford, Vilsack, and Fogarty in the amounts of 24,000, 12,000, 12,000, and 12,000 shares, respectively. These restricted shares vest one-third each year over three years. The Compensation Committee did not perform a qualitative or quantitative analysis, but instead used its subjective judgment and discretion in determining the value of the equity awards. Restricted shares were utilized over stock options because restricted shares serve to reward and retain executives and foster stock ownership, while also minimizing the number of shares granted in aggregate. In exercising its judgment and discretion, the Compensation Committee was influenced by recommendations from our CEO and motivated by its desire to award each named executive officer with the equity value that is considered necessary to achieve the shareholder alignment and attraction, retention and motivation objectives of our compensation program. The Compensation Committee’s review and consideration of each of the named executive officer’s equity grants were of a general nature, rather than identifying and focusing on each individual’s performance relative to specific tasks, projects or accomplishments or distinguishable qualitative performance goals. The Compensation Committee did not otherwise take into account any specific performance, criteria or achievements relative to qualitative performance goals when making its equity compensation decisions for 2010. In granting the 2010 restricted share awards, the Compensation Committee also considered:

 

 

Information about equity awards granted in 2010 to our CEO and our other named executive officers is contained in the “2010 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table.

 

Retirement Benefits

 

Our Individual Account Retirement Plan, or 401(k) Plan, is a tax-qualified retirement savings plan that permits our employees, including our named executive officers, to defer a portion of their annual salary to the 401(k) Plan on a before-tax basis. Our named executive officers participate in the 401(k) Plan on the same basis as all other salaried employees whereby we annually contribute 2% of their salary into the 401(k) Plan on their behalf, subject to Internal Revenue Code limitations. Effective March 1, 2009, the Compensation Committee, after considering recommendations from our CEO, and after taking into account economic and business conditions and our financial performance for 2008 and 2009, suspended the 2% contribution for our named executive officers. Our named executive officers vest in the Company contributions ratably over six years of employment service, at which time they are 100% vested.

 

In 2008, the Compensation Committee established the DC Plan and the DB Plan for our CEO, which is described under “Pension Benefits” and “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation” below. These retirement benefits are intended to reward our CEO for his past service to us and, to recognize, over the long term, future service to us.

 

Deferred Compensation

 

The Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, which we refer to as the 2005 Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan, or 2005 Plan, that allows certain employees, including our named executive officers, to defer a percentage of their salary and bonus, to be paid at a time specified by the participant and consistent with the terms of the plan. We do not provide any matching contributions to the 2005 Plan. We do not pay above-market interest rates or provide preferential earnings.

Our CEO is the only participant in the DC Plan to which we make an annual contribution of $375,000 as noted in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation table below. We do not pay above-market interest rates or provide preferential earnings.

 

Termination-Related Payments

 

All of our named executive officers are employees-at-will and, as such, do not have employment agreements with us. Therefore, we are not obligated to provide any post-employment compensation or benefits. However, upon a change of control, as defined in the 1998 Plan, all unvested stock option grants become fully exercisable, all outstanding restricted share grants fully vest, and our CEO becomes 100% vested in his benefit under the DB Plan, regardless of years of service.

 

Other Benefits

 

We also provide other benefits to our named executive officers that we consider necessary in order to offer fully-competitive opportunities to attract and retain our named executive officers. These benefits include life insurance, Company cars or car allowances, executive physicals, and club dues. Named executive officers are eligible to participate in all of our employee benefit plans, such as the 401(k) Plan and medical, dental, group life, disability and accidental death and dismemberment insurance, in each case on the same basis as other employees.

 

Limitations on Deductibility of Compensation

 

As part of its role, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which generally disallows a tax deduction to public corporations for compensation over $1,000,000 paid for any fiscal year to a company’s CEO and certain other named executive officers as of the end of any fiscal year. However, the statute exempts qualifying performance-based compensation from the deduction limit if certain requirements are met.

 

The Compensation Committee believes that it is generally in our best interest to attempt to structure performance-based compensation, including annual bonuses, to named executive officers who may be subject to Section 162(m) in a manner that satisfies the statute’s requirements. However, the Compensation Committee also recognizes the need to retain flexibility to make compensation decisions that may not meet Section 162(m) standards when necessary to enable us to meet our overall objectives, even if we may not deduct all of the compensation. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has expressly reserved the authority to award non-deductible compensation in appropriate circumstances.

 

We are not obligated to offset any income taxes due on any compensation or benefits, including income or excise taxes due on any income from accelerated vesting of outstanding equity grants. To the extent any such amounts are considered “excess parachute payments” under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code and thus, not deductible by us, the Compensation Committee is aware of that possibility and has decided to accept the cost of that lost deduction. However, the Compensation Committee has not thought it necessary for us to take on the additional cost of reimbursing executives for any taxes generated by the vesting accelerations.

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

We have reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on our review and discussion with management, we have recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

Ronna Romney, Chair

Dan T. Moore III

James W. Wert

 

INFORMATION REGARDING COMPENSATION/GRANTS

 

The following table sets forth for fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008, all compensation earned by the individuals who served as our CEO and Chief Financial Officer during fiscal 2010, and by our three highest paid employees serving as other executive officers as of the end of 2010, whom we refer to collectively as our named executive officers.

 

Summary Compensation Table for 2010

 

 

 

For 2010, base salary was 37% of total compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for Mr. Edward Crawford; 41% for Mr. Matthew Crawford; 45% for Mr. Rutherford; 40% for Mr. Vilsack; and 40% for Mr. Fogarty.

 

None of the named executive officers has an employment agreement with us.

2010 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

The following table sets forth the restricted share grants and Bonus Plan award granted in 2010.

 

 

 

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2010 Fiscal Year-End

 

 

 

 

 

2010 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 

 

 

 

PENSION BENEFITS FOR 2010

 

The following table sets forth information with respect to our DB Plan, as of December 31, 2010.

 

 

 

 

The DB Plan provides Mr. Edward Crawford with an annual retirement benefit of up to $375,000 upon his termination of employment with us, for his life, as defined in the DB Plan. The annual benefit that he actually receives depends on his years of credited service as of his termination of employment. If he has 20 or more years of credited service, he will receive the full $375,000 annual benefit. Prior to 20 years of credited service, the accrued benefit equals $375,000 multiplied by the ratio of years of credited service to 20 years. If he dies while employed or before the first day of the month following his termination of employment, his spouse is entitled to receive an amount equal to 50% of the amount he would have been entitled to receive on the date of his death, payable semi-annually for the life of his spouse. In the event of a change in control of the Company, the full $375,000 annual benefit is payable, regardless of service.

 

No other named executive officer participated in a pension plan during 2010.

 

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR 2010

 

The following table sets forth information with respect to the DC Plan and our 2005 Plan, as of December 31, 2010.

 

 

 

 

The DC Plan provides our CEO with an aggregate annual credit of $375,000, or DC Benefit, during the seven-year period beginning on January 1, 2008 and ending on December 31, 2014. The DC Benefit is credited to an account on our books for our CEO, provided he has not had a termination of employment with the Company, as defined in the DC Plan. Our CEO’s account is adjusted for any positive or negative investment results from phantom investment alternatives selected by him. These phantom investment alternatives track actual market investments and are similar to the investment alternatives offered under our 401(k) Plan. We do not provide above-market or preferential earnings on the amounts credited under the DC Plan. We contribute to a grantor trust in order to provide a source of funds for the benefits under the DC Plan. Our CEO is at all times 100% vested in the DC Benefit and any earnings thereon. The amount credited under the DC Plan for our CEO will be paid upon his termination of employment.

 

Our 2005 Plan is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain key employees, including our named executive officers. Under the 2005 Plan, eligible participants can defer up to 100% of their base salary and 100% of their cash bonus for pre-tax savings opportunities. The investment options available to the participant are the same investment options offered under our 401(k) Plan. Participants’ contributions and earnings are always 100% vested. Distributions under the 2005 Plan may be made only upon a Separation of Service (as defined in the 2005 Plan), disability, or hardship. Distributions are paid in a lump sum or in annual installments over a maximum of 10 years.

 

No other named executive officers participated in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan during 2010.

 

POTENTIAL POST-EMPLOYMENT PAYMENTS

 

Upon termination of employment for any reason, no severance benefits are payable to any of the named executive officers.

 

Upon the death, disability, or retirement of a named executive officer, all restricted share grants fully vest and all unvested stock options become immediately exercisable under the 1998 Plan, and under the DB Plan, certain benefits are immediately recognized. The value of these vesting accelerations and benefits for the named executive officers, as if a death, disability or retirement had occurred on December 31, 2010, would be as follows:

 

 

 

 

Under the 1998 Plan, upon a change of control, all restricted share grants fully vest and all unvested stock options become immediately exercisable. Under the DB Plan, upon a change of control, all pension benefits fully vest. The value of these vesting accelerations for the named executive officers, as if a change of control had occurred on December 31, 2010, would be as follows:

 

 

 

 

No cash payments or other benefits are due the named executive officers upon a change of control, as defined in the 1998 Plan. A change of control is generally defined in the 1998 Plan and DB Plan as: (i) our corporate reorganization or a sale of substantially all of our assets with the result that the shareholders prior to the reorganization or sale afterwards hold less than a majority of our voting stock; (ii) any person becoming the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the combined voting power of our outstanding securities; and (iii) a change in the majority of our Board.

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

 

 

 

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

 

In accordance with our Audit Committee Charter, our Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the terms and conditions of all related-party transactions. In some cases, however, the Audit Committee will defer the approval of a related-party transaction to the disinterested members of the full Board.

 

Neither the Audit Committee nor the Board has written policies or procedures with respect to the review, approval or ratification of related-party transactions. Instead, the Audit Committee, or the Board, as applicable, reviews each proposed transaction on a case-by-case basis taking into account all relevant factors, including whether the terms and conditions are at least as favorable to us as if negotiated on an arm’s-length basis with unrelated third parties. The following related-party transactions have been approved either by our Board or our Audit Committee.

 

During 2010, we chartered, on an hourly basis, an airplane from a third-party private aircraft charter company. One of the aircraft available for use by us is an aircraft owned jointly by this charter company and a company owned by Mr. Edward Crawford. For 2010, we paid $270,585 for the use of that aircraft. Through companies owned by Mr. Edward Crawford, we lease a 125,000 square foot facility in Huntington, Indiana, at a monthly rent of $13,500 and a 60,450 square foot building we use as our corporate headquarters in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, at a monthly rent of $65,437.

 

Through companies owned by Mr. Matthew Crawford, we lease two buildings in Conneaut, Ohio: a 91,300 square foot facility, at a monthly rent of $35,740 and an additional 70,000 square foot attached facility, at a monthly rent of $10,500; a 150,000 square foot facility in Cleveland, Ohio, at a monthly rent of $29,686; and a 125,000 square foot facility in Canton, at a monthly rent of $51,500.

 

During 2010, we received an aggregate amount of $128,000 for providing office space, secretarial, and information technology support to companies owned by Mr. Edward Crawford.

 

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2012 ANNUAL MEETING

 

2012 Proposals.  Any shareholder who intends to present a proposal to include in the proxy materials for the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders must comply with Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act. To have the proposal included in our proxy statement and form of proxy for that meeting, the shareholder must deliver the proposal in writing by December 21, 2011 to the Secretary of the Company, at 6065 Parkland Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44124.

 

Advance Notice Procedures.  Under our Regulations, no business may be brought before an annual meeting unless it is specified in the notice of the meeting or otherwise brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board or by a shareholder who has delivered written notice to our Secretary not less than sixty days nor more than ninety days before the meeting. If there was less than seventy-five days notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting given or made to the shareholders, then in order for the written notice by the shareholder to be timely, it must be received no later than the close of business on the fifteenth day after the earlier of the day on which such notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. Accordingly, if a shareholder intends to present a proposal at the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders outside the processes of Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act, the shareholder must provide written notice pursuant to the procedures contained in our Regulations that are outlined above. Our proxy statement relating to the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders will give discretionary authority to those individuals named in the accompanying proxy to vote with respect to all non-Rule 14a-8 proposals not included in the proxy statement relating to the 2012 annual meeting if the proposals are properly presented at the 2012 annual meeting.

 

ANNUAL REPORT

 

Our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2010 is being mailed to each shareholder of record with this Proxy Statement. Additional copies may be obtained from the undersigned.

 

OTHER MATTERS

 

Set forth below are directions to The Cleveland Marriott East:

 

  Directions to the Marriott Cleveland East, 26300 Harvard Road, Warrensville Heights, Ohio 44122:

 

From South:

 

 

From East:

 

 

From North (Downtown Cleveland):

 

 

From West:

 

 

PARK-OHIO HOLDINGS CORP.

 

ROBERT D. VILSACK

  Secretary & General Counsel

 

April 19, 2011

 

APPENDIX A

 

PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES, INC.

ANNUAL CASH BONUS PLAN

 

1.  Purpose.  The purpose of the Annual Cash Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) is to attract and retain key executives for Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the “Company”), and its Subsidiaries and to provide such persons with incentives for superior performance. Incentive Bonus payments made under the Plan are intended to constitute qualified “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and Section 1.162-27 of the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, and the Plan shall be construed consistently with such intention.

 

2.  Definitions.  As used in this Plan,

 

“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

 

“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

 

“Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board or any other committee appointed by the Board to administer the Plan; provided, however, that in any event the Committee shall be comprised of not less than two directors of the Company, each of whom shall qualify as an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code and Section 1.162-27(e)(3) of the Regulations.

 

“Eligible Executive” means the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and any other executive officer of the Company designated by the Committee.

 

“Incentive Bonus” shall mean, for each Eligible Executive, a bonus opportunity amount determined by the Committee pursuant to Section 5 below.

 

“Management Objectives” means the achievement of a performance objective or objectives established pursuant to this Plan for Eligible Executives. Management Objectives may be described in terms of Company-wide objectives or objectives that are related to the performance of the individual Eligible Executive or of the Subsidiary, division, department or function within the Company or Subsidiary in which the Eligible Executive is employed. Management Objectives may be measured on a relative or absolute basis. The Management Objectives shall be limited to specified levels of, growth in or relative peer company performance in one or more or a combination of the following: (i) earnings per share; (ii) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization; (iii) earnings before interest and taxes; (iv) earnings before taxes; (v) return on invested capital; (vi) return on total capital; (vii) return on assets; (viii) return on equity; (ix) total shareholder return; (x) growth in net income, revenue, cash flow, or operating profit; and/or (xi) productivity improvement.

 

“Regulations” mean the Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Code, as amended from time to time.

 

“Subsidiary” means a corporation, partnership, joint venture, unincorporated association or other entity in which the Company has a direct or indirect ownership or other equity interest.

 

3.  Administration of the Plan.  The Plan shall be administered by the Committee, which shall have full power and authority to construe, interpret and administer the Plan and shall have the exclusive right to establish Management Objectives and the amount of Incentive Bonus payable to each Eligible Executive upon the achievement of the specified Management Objectives.

 

4.  Eligibility.  Eligibility under this Plan is limited to Eligible Executives designated by the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion.

 

5.  Awards.

 

(a) Not later than the 90th day of each fiscal year of the Company, the Committee shall establish the Management Objectives for each Eligible Executive and the amount of Incentive Bonus payable (or formula for determining such amount) upon full achievement of the specified Management Objectives. The Committee may further specify in respect of the specified Management Objectives a minimum acceptable level of achievement below which no Incentive Bonus payment will be made and shall set forth a formula for determining the amount of

any payment to be made if performance is at or above the minimum acceptable level but falls short of full achievement of the specified Management Objectives. The Committee may not modify any terms of awards established pursuant to this section, except to the extent that after such modification the Incentive Bonus would continue to constitute qualified “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.

 

(b) The Committee retains the discretion to reduce the amount of any Incentive Bonus that would be otherwise payable to an Eligible Executive (including a reduction in such amount to zero).

 

(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, in no event shall the Incentive Bonus paid to an Eligible Executive under the Plan for a year exceed $3.0 million.

 

6.  Committee Certification.  As soon as reasonably practicable after the end of each fiscal year of the Company, the Committee shall determine whether the Management Objective has been achieved and the amount of the Incentive Bonus to be paid to each Eligible Executive for such fiscal year and shall certify such determinations in writing.

 

7.  Payment of Incentive Bonuses.  Subject to a valid election made by an Eligible Executive with respect to the deferral of all or a portion of his or her Incentive Bonus, Incentive Bonuses shall be paid within 30 days after written certification pursuant to section 6, but in no event later than two and a half months from the end of the Company’s fiscal year.

 

8.  No Right to Bonus or Continued Employment.  Neither the establishment of the Plan, the provision for or payment of any amounts hereunder nor any action of the Company, the Board or the Committee with respect to the Plan shall be held or construed to confer upon any person (a) any legal right to receive, or any interest in, an Incentive Bonus or any other benefit under the Plan or (b) any legal right to continue to serve as an officer or employee of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company.

 

9.  Withholding.  The Company shall have the right to withhold, or require an Eligible Executive to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy any applicable federal, state, local or foreign withholding tax requirements imposed with respect to the payment of any Incentive Bonus.

 

10.  Nontransferability.  Except as expressly provided by the Committee, the rights and benefits under the Plan shall not be transferable or assignable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

 

11.  Effective Date.  Subject to its approval by the stockholders, this Plan shall become effective May 26, 2011, and shall remain effective until the first shareholders’ meeting in 2016, subject to any further stockholder approvals (or reapprovals) mandated for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, and subject to the right of the Board to terminate the Plan, on a prospective basis only, at any time.