e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
February 25,
2011
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
Commission File Number
1-13873
STEELCASE INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Michigan
(State of incorporation)
|
|
38-0819050
(IRS employer identification
number)
|
901 44th Street SE
Grand Rapids, Michigan
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
49508
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(616) 247-2710
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
|
|
Securities
registered pursuant to 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer þ Non-accelerated
filer o Smaller
reporting
company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity of the registrant held by non-affiliates, computed by
reference to the closing price of the Class A Common Stock
on the New York Stock Exchange, as of August 27, 2010 (the
last day of the registrants most recently completed second
fiscal quarter) was approximately $503 million. There is no
quoted market for registrants Class B Common Stock,
but shares of Class B Common Stock may be converted at any
time into an equal number of shares of Class A Common Stock.
As of April 22, 2011, 87,435,440 shares of the
registrants Class A Common Stock and
44,199,378 shares of the registrants Class B
Common Stock were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for
its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be held on
July 13, 2011, are incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K.
STEELCASE INC.
FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 25, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Business
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
(Removed and Reserved)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Item. Executive Officers of the Registrant
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Item 7A.
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Item 8.
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Item 9.
|
|
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
Item 9A.
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
Item 9B.
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 10.
|
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part IV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 15.
|
|
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
Schedule II
|
|
|
S-1
|
|
|
Index of Exhibits
|
|
|
E-1
|
|
|
PART I
The following business overview is qualified in its entirety by
the more detailed information included elsewhere or incorporated
by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(Report). As used in this Report, unless otherwise
expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, all
references to Steelcase, we,
our, Company and similar references are
to Steelcase Inc. and its subsidiaries in which a controlling
interest is maintained. Unless the context otherwise indicates,
reference to a year relates to the fiscal year, ended in
February of the year indicated, rather than a calendar year.
Additionally, Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 reference the first, second,
third and fourth quarter, respectively, of the fiscal year
indicated. All amounts are in millions, except share and per
share data, data presented as a percentage or as otherwise
indicated.
Our
Business
Steelcase is the global leader in furnishing the work experience
in office environments. We aspire to create great experiences,
wherever work happens. We provide products and services founded
in a research methodology that generates insights about how
people work and how spaces can help create great experiences. We
offer a comprehensive portfolio of products and services for the
workplace, inspired by insights gained from serving the
worlds leading organizations for nearly 100 years.
We design for a wide variety of customer needs through our three
core brands: Steelcase, Turnstone and Coalesse. The primary
focus of these brands is the office furniture segment, but we
also extend our capabilities to serve needs in areas such as
healthcare, education and distributed work. Our strategy is to
grow by leveraging our deep understanding of the patterns of
work, workers and workplaces to offer solutions to help our
existing customers migrate to new ways of working, and to grow
our business into new customer markets and new geographies.
Insights are core to everything we do. We study the ways people
work, and we collaborate with a global network of research
partners including leading universities, research institutes and
corporations. We seek to understand and recognize emerging
social, spatial and informational patterns and create products
and solutions that solve for the intersection of all three. By
focusing our insights on the overlap of these elements, we can
create products and solutions that enable better social
interactions, enhance collaboration and facilitate greater
information sharing. This approach is the lens through which we
filter opportunities for development.
We create value by translating our insights into products,
solutions and experiences that solve our customers
critical business issues at competitive prices. Our insights are
translated into products, applications and experiences through
thoughtful design, which we define as being smart, desirable and
viable. When we understand something new about the way people
work and address that insight with a product, its smart.
When we create experiences or objects that are considered
refined and highly relevant, they are desirable. And when we do
this with fewer, more understandable elements, its viable.
We incorporate sustainability in our approach to design,
manufacturing, delivery and product life cycle management, and
we consider the impact of our work on the environment. At
Steelcase our approach to sustainability is holistic,
scientific, measureable and long-term in focus.
We offer our products and services to customers around the
globe, and we have significant sales, manufacturing and
administrative operations in North America, Europe and Asia. We
market our products and services primarily through a network of
independent and company-owned dealers, and we also sell directly
to end-use customers. We extend our reach with a presence in
retail and web-based channels.
Founded in 1912, Steelcase became a publicly-traded company in
1998, and our stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol SCS. Headquartered in Grand Rapids,
Michigan,
1
U.S.A., Steelcase is a global company with approximately
10,000 employees and 2011 revenue of $2.4 billion.
Our
Offerings
Our brands provide an integrated portfolio of furniture systems
and seating, user-centered technologies and interior
architectural products across a range of price points. Our
furniture portfolio includes panel-based and freestanding
furniture systems and complementary products such as storage,
tables and ergonomic worktools. Our seating products include
chairs which are highly ergonomic, seating that can be used in
collaborative or casual settings and specialty seating for
specific vertical markets such as healthcare and education. Our
technology solutions support group collaboration by integrating
furniture and technology. Our interior architectural products
include full and partial height walls and doors. We also offer
services designed to reduce costs and enhance the performance of
people, wherever they work. Among these services are workplace
strategy consulting, lease origination services and furniture
and asset management.
SteelcaseInsight-led
performance in an interconnected world
The Steelcase brand takes our insights and delivers high
performance, sustainable work environments while striving to be
a trusted partner. Being a trusted partner means understanding
and helping our customers and partners who truly seek to elevate
their performance. The Steelcase brands core customers are
leading organizations (such as corporations, healthcare
organizations, colleges/universities and government entities)
that are often large with complex needs and who have an
increasingly global reach. We strive to meet their diverse needs
while minimizing complexity by using a platform
approachfrom product components to common
processeswherever possible.
Steelcase
sub-brands
include:
|
|
|
|
|
Nurture by Steelcase, which is focused on healthcare
environments that can help make patients more comfortable,
caregivers more efficient and partners in care more receptive to
healthcare delivery. Nurture brings a holistic viewpoint to
healthcare environments and works with patients and healthcare
professionals to develop valuable insights into environments
that promote healing.
|
|
|
|
Details, which researches, designs and markets worktools
and furniture that provide healthy and productive connections
between people, their technology, their workplaces and their
work.
|
TurnstoneInsight-led
simplicity
Turnstone is focused on making it easy and compelling for
emerging companies to create great working spaces. Today,
emerging companies do not have easy access to solutions that
will help them work more effectively. These smaller companies
are faced with many of the same complex problems as larger
established companiesbut often without the professional
help. Turnstone strives to provide simple solutions for the
complex social, spatial and informational problems of emerging
companies through thoughtful products and solutions, convenient
access and a great experience.
CoalesseInsight-led
inspiration
Coalesse is founded on the belief that the boundaries between
work and life have blurred and seeks to design solutions that
support meaningful experiences and create inspiring spaces for a
growing class of high performance knowledge workers. Coalesse
collaborates with some of the worlds best design talent to
create inspired solutions that challenge generic approaches to
home and office environments. Coalesse also offers products that
knit together the rich design histories of our Brayton, Metro
and Vecta brands. Coalesses clients desire premium
performance and versatility in furnishings that can be applied
in a home workplace as elegantly as a professional office
environment.
Designtex, which is a
sub-brand of
Coalesse, is a design, marketing, sales and distribution
business focused on providing insight-led environment
enhancement. Designtex products are premium surface
2
materials designed to enhance seating, walls, work stations,
floors and ceilings, and can provide privacy, way-finding,
motivation, communications and artistic expression.
PolyVision
PolyVisions main focus is to understand the needs of K-12
teachers and students and to develop tools that bring learning
to life in an effort to provide a better learning experience for
students globally. PolyVision provides a comprehensive offering
of visual communication solutions, including static and
interactive electronic whiteboards.
Reportable
Segments
We operate on a worldwide basis within our North America and
International reportable segments plus an Other
category. Additional information about our reportable segments,
including financial information about geographic areas, is
contained in Item 7: Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements.
North America
Segment
Our North America segment serves customers in the United States
(U.S.) and Canada. Our portfolio of integrated
architecture, furniture and technology products is marketed to
corporate, government, healthcare, education and retail
customers through the Steelcase, Turnstone, Details and Nurture
by Steelcase brands.
We serve North America customers mainly through approximately
220 independent and company-owned dealers and we also sell
directly to end-use customers. Our end-use customers are
distributed across a broad range of industries and vertical
markets including healthcare, government, financial services,
higher education and technology, but no industry or vertical
market individually represented more than 15% of the North
America segment revenue in 2011. The healthcare, government and
higher education vertical markets collectively represented
approximately 39% of 2011 North America revenue.
Each of our dealers maintains its own sales force, which is
complemented by our sales representatives who work closely with
our dealers throughout the selling process. The largest
independent dealer in North America accounted for approximately
6% of the segments revenue in 2011, and the five largest
independent dealers collectively accounted for approximately 17%
of the segments revenue. From time to time, we extend
financial support to our dealers. The type of involvement
varies, but it most often takes the form of asset-backed lending
or term notes to facilitate the transition of a dealership to
owners suitable to us. Depending on the situation, accounting
rules may require us to consolidate a dealer for a period of
time when we extend such financing.
In 2011, the North America segment recorded revenue of $1,322.2,
or 54.3% of our consolidated revenue, and as of the end of the
year had approximately 5,600 employees, of which
approximately 3,600 related to manufacturing.
The North America office furniture industry is highly
competitive, with a number of competitors offering similar
categories of products. The industry competes on a combination
of insight, product performance, design, price and relationships
with customers, architects and designers. Our most significant
competitors in the U.S. are Haworth, Inc., Herman Miller,
Inc., HNI Corporation, Kimball International Inc. and Knoll,
Inc. Together with Steelcase, domestic revenue from these
companies represents approximately one-half of the
U.S. office furniture industry.
International
Segment
Our International segment serves customers outside of the
U.S. and Canada primarily under the Steelcase brand, with
an emphasis on freestanding furniture systems, storage and
seating solutions. The international office furniture market is
highly competitive and fragmented. We compete with many local
and regional manufacturers in many different markets. In many
cases, these competitors focus on
3
specific product categories. Our largest presence is in Western
Europe, where we have the leading market share in Germany,
France and Spain. In 2011, approximately 66% of International
revenue was from Western Europe. The remaining revenue was from
other parts of Europe, Latin America, Asia Pacific, the Middle
East and Africa. No individual country in the International
segment represented more than 7% of our consolidated revenue in
2011.
We serve International customers through approximately 440
independent and company-owned dealers. In certain geographic
markets, we sell directly to end-use customers. No single
independent dealer in the International segment accounted for
more than 2% of the segments revenue in 2011. The five
largest independent dealers collectively accounted for
approximately 8% of the segments revenue in 2011.
In 2011, our International segment recorded revenue of $698.9,
or 28.7% of our consolidated revenue, and as of the end of the
year had approximately 3,300 employees, of which
approximately 1,900 related to manufacturing.
Other
Category
The Other category includes the Coalesse Group and PolyVision.
The Coalesse Group is comprised of the Coalesse and Designtex
brands. Coalesse serves the markets of executive office,
conference, lounge, teaming environments and residential
live/work solutions utilizing a commissioned sales force with
revenue primarily generated through our North America dealer
network. Designtex primarily sells products specified by
architects and designers directly to end-use customers through a
direct sales force.
PolyVision designs and manufactures visual communication
products, such as static and interactive electronic whiteboards,
including a family of interactive electronic whiteboards called
ēno. PolyVision also manufactures steel and ceramic
surfaces for sale to third-party fabricators to create static
whiteboards sold in the primary and secondary education markets
in the U.S. and Europe. PolyVisions sales of visual
communication products are primarily through audio-visual
resellers and our North America dealer network.
Prior to December 14, 2010, the Other category also
included the operations of IDEO, an innovation and design firm.
On December 14, 2010, certain members of the management of
IDEO who collectively owned 20% of IDEO purchased an additional
60% equity interest in IDEO pursuant to an agreement entered
into during 2008. We retained a 20% equity interest in IDEO, and
we expect to continue our collaborative relationship. As a
result, we deconsolidated the operations of IDEO in Q4 2011 and
began to record our share of IDEOs earnings as equity in
earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in Other income
(expense), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In 2011, IDEO accounted for $103.4, or 4% of our consolidated
revenue.
In 2011, the Other category accounted for $416.0, or 17.1% of
our consolidated revenue, and as of the end of the year had
approximately 1,100 employees, of which approximately 600
related to manufacturing.
Corporate
Corporate costs include portions of shared service functions
such as information technology, human resources, finance,
executive, corporate facilities, legal and research.
Approximately 82% of corporate expenses were charged to the
operating segments in 2011 as part of a corporate allocation.
Unallocated corporate expenses are reported as Corporate.
Joint Ventures
and Other Equity Investments
We enter into joint ventures and other equity investments from
time to time to expand or maintain our geographic presence,
support our distribution network or invest in complementary
products and
4
services. As of February 25, 2011, our investment in these
unconsolidated joint ventures and other equity investments
totaled $45.2. Our share of the earnings from joint ventures and
other equity investments is recorded in Other income
(expense), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Customer and
Dealer Concentrations
Our largest direct-sale customer accounted for 0.4% of our
consolidated revenue in 2011, and our five largest direct-sale
customers collectively accounted for 1.5% of our consolidated
revenue. However, these percentages do not include revenue from
various government agencies. In aggregate, entities purchasing
under our U.S. General Services Administration contract
collectively accounted for approximately 4% of our consolidated
revenue. We do not believe our business is dependent on any
single or small number of end-use customers, the loss of which
would have a material adverse effect on our business.
No single independent dealer accounted for more than 4% of our
consolidated revenue in 2011. The five largest independent
dealers collectively accounted for approximately 10% of our
consolidated revenue. We do not believe our business is
dependent on any single dealer, the loss of which would have a
sustained material adverse effect upon our business.
Working
Capital
Our accounts receivable are from our dealers and direct-sale
customers. Payment terms vary by country and region. The terms
of our North America segment, and certain markets within the
International segment, encourage prompt payment from dealers by
offering an early settlement discount. Other international
markets have, by market convention, longer payment terms. We are
not aware of any special or unusual practices or conditions
related to working capital items, including accounts receivable,
inventory and accounts payable, which are significant to
understanding our business or the industry at large.
Backlog
Our products are generally manufactured and shipped within two
to six weeks following receipt of order; therefore, we do not
view the amount of backlog at any particular time as a
meaningful indicator of longer-term shipments.
Global
Manufacturing and Supply Chain
Manufacturing
and Logistics
We have manufacturing operations throughout North America
(principally in the United States and Mexico), Europe
(principally in France, Germany and Spain) and Asia (principally
in China and Malaysia).
Our manufacturing model is predominately
make-to-order
with lead times typically ranging from two to six weeks. We
manufacture our products using lean manufacturing principles,
which allow us to maintain efficiencies and cost savings by
minimizing the amount of inventory on hand. As a result, we
purchase direct materials and components as needed to meet
demand. We have evolved our manufacturing and supply chain
systems significantly over the past several years by
implementing continuous one-piece flow, platforming our
processes and product offerings and developing a global network
of integrated suppliers. Any operation which cannot be part of
one-piece flow may be evaluated to see whether outside partners
would offer better levels of service, quality and cost. Our
global manufacturing operations are centralized under a single
organization to serve our customers needs across multiple
brands and geographies.
This approach has reduced the capital needs of our business,
inventory levels and the footprint of our manufacturing space,
while at the same time, allowing us to improve quality, delivery
performance and the customer experience. We continue to identify
opportunities to improve the fitness of our business and
strengthen our long-term competitiveness. In 2011, we
substantially completed a project
5
to reorganize our European manufacturing operations, and we
announced the planned closure of three additional manufacturing
facilities in North America. We expect to move production within
these facilities to other Steelcase locations in North America
over the next 18 months.
In addition to our ongoing focus on enhancing the efficiency of
our manufacturing operations, we also seek to reduce costs
through our global sourcing effort. We have capitalized on raw
material and component cost savings available through lower cost
suppliers around the globe. This global view of potential
sources of supply has enhanced our leverage with domestic supply
sources, and we have been able to reduce cycle times through
improvements from all levels throughout the supply chain.
Our physical distribution system utilizes commercial transport,
company-owned and dedicated fleet delivery services. We have
implemented a network of regional distribution centers to reduce
freight costs and improve service to our dealers and customers.
Some of these distribution centers are located within our
manufacturing facilities, and we have engaged third-party
logistics providers to operate most of these regional
distribution centers.
Raw
Materials
We source raw materials and components from a significant number
of suppliers around the world. Those raw materials include
petroleum-based products, steel, other metals, wood,
particleboard and other materials and components. To date, we
have not experienced any significant difficulties in obtaining
these raw materials.
The prices for certain commodities such as steel, aluminum and
other metals, wood, particleboard and petroleum-based products
have fluctuated significantly in recent years due to changes in
global supply and demand. Our global supply chain team
continually evaluates current market conditions, the financial
viability of our suppliers and available supply options on the
basis of cost, quality and reliability of supply.
Research, Design
and Development
Our extensive global researcha combination of user
observations, feedback sessions and sophisticated
analysishas helped us develop social, spatial and
informational insights into work effectiveness. We maintain
collaborative relationships with external world-class
innovators, including leading universities, think tanks and
knowledge leaders, to expand and deepen our understanding of how
people work.
Understanding patterns of work enables us to identify and
anticipate user needs across the globe. Our design teams explore
and develop prototypical solutions to address these needs. These
solutions vary from furniture, architecture and technology
solutions to single products or enhancements to existing
products, and across different vertical market applications such
as healthcare, higher education and professional services.
Organizationally, global design leadership directs strategy and
project work, which is distributed to design studios across our
major businesses and often involves external design services.
Our marketing team evaluates product concepts using several
criteria, including financial return metrics, and chooses which
products will be developed and launched. Designers then work
closely with engineers and suppliers to co-develop products and
processes that incorporate innovative user features with
efficient manufacturing practices. Products are tested for
performance, quality and compliance with applicable standards
and regulations.
Exclusive of royalty payments, we invested $32.0, $33.0 and
$50.0 in research, design and development activities in 2011,
2010 and 2009, respectively. We continue to invest approximately
one to two percent of our revenue in research, design and
development each year. Royalties are sometimes paid to external
designers of our products as the products are sold. These costs
are not included in research and development expenses.
6
Intellectual
Property
We generate and hold a significant number of patents in a number
of countries in connection with the operation of our business.
We also hold a number of trademarks that are very important to
our identity and recognition in the marketplace. We do not
believe that any material part of our business is dependent on
the continued availability of any one or all of our patents or
trademarks or that our business would be materially adversely
affected by the loss of any of such, except the
Steelcase, Turnstone,
Coalesse, PolyVision,
Designtex, Details and Nurture by
Steelcase trademarks.
We occasionally enter into license agreements under which we pay
a royalty to third parties for the use of patented products,
designs or process technology. We have established a global
network of intellectual property licenses with our subsidiaries.
Employees
As of February 25, 2011, we had approximately
10,000 employees, including 5,100 hourly employees and
4,900 salaried employees. Additionally, we had approximately 800
temporary workers who primarily work in manufacturing.
Approximately 160 employees in the U.S. are covered by
collective bargaining agreements. Internationally, approximately
900 employees are represented by workers councils
that operate to promote the interests of workers. Management
promotes positive relations with employees based on empowerment
and teamwork.
Environmental
Matters
We are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and foreign
laws and regulations relating to the discharge of materials into
the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the
environment (Environmental Laws). We believe our
operations are in substantial compliance with all Environmental
Laws. We do not believe existing Environmental Laws and
regulations have had or will have any material effects upon our
capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.
Under certain Environmental Laws, we could be held liable,
without regard to fault, for the costs of remediation associated
with our existing or historical operations. We could also be
held responsible for third-party property and personal injury
claims or for violations of Environmental Laws relating to
contamination. We are a party to, or otherwise involved in,
proceedings relating to several contaminated properties being
investigated and remediated under Environmental Laws, including
as a potentially responsible party in several Superfund site
cleanups. Based on our information regarding the nature and
volume of wastes allegedly disposed of or released at these
properties, the total estimated cleanup costs and other
financially viable potentially responsible parties, we do not
believe the costs to us associated with these properties will be
material, either individually or in the aggregate. We have
established reserves that we believe are adequate to cover our
anticipated remediation costs. However, certain events could
cause our actual costs to vary from the established reserves.
These events include, but are not limited to: a change in
governmental regulations or cleanup standards or requirements;
undiscovered information regarding the nature and volume of
wastes allegedly disposed of or released at these properties;
and other factors increasing the cost of remediation or the loss
of other potentially responsible parties that are financially
capable of contributing toward cleanup costs.
Available
Information
We file annual reports, quarterly reports, proxy statements and
other documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act). The public may read and copy any
materials we file with the SEC at the SECs Public
Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information
on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC
at
1-800-SEC-0330.
Also, the SEC maintains an Internet website at www.sec.gov
that contains reports, proxy and information statements and
other information regarding issuers, including Steelcase, that
file electronically with the SEC.
7
We also make available free of charge through our internet
website, www.steelcase.com, our annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file such reports with or
furnish them to the SEC. In addition, our Corporate Governance
Principles, Code of Ethics, Code of Business Conduct and the
charters for the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committees are available free of charge
through our website or by writing to Steelcase Inc., Investor
Relations, GH-3C, PO Box 1967, Grand Rapids, Michigan
49501-1967.
We are not including the information contained on our website as
a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Report.
The following risk factors and other information included in
this annual report on
Form 10-K
should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties
described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks
and uncertainties that we do not know about currently, or that
we currently believe are less significant, may also adversely
affect our business, operating results, cash flows and financial
condition. If any of these risks actually occur, our business,
operating results, cash flows and financial condition could be
materially adversely affected.
Our industry
is influenced significantly by cyclical macroeconomic factors
which are difficult to predict.
Our revenue is generated predominantly from the office furniture
industry, and demand for office furniture is influenced heavily
by a variety of macroeconomic factors, such as corporate
profits, non-residential fixed investment, white-collar
employment and commercial office construction and vacancy rates.
During the past 10 years, the U.S. office furniture
industry has gone through two major downturns, with consumption
declining by more than 30% from calendar year 2000 to 2003 and
again from 2007 to 2009, according to the Business and
Institutional Furniture Manufacturers Association. During
these downturns, our revenue declined in similar proportion and
our profitability was significantly reduced. We have made a
number of changes to adapt our business model to these cycles,
but our profitability could be impacted in the future by
cyclical downturns. In addition, the pace of industry recovery
after a cyclical downturn may vary, including by geography or
vertical market. These macroeconomic factors are difficult to
predict, and if we are unsuccessful in adapting our business as
economic cyclical changes occur, our results may be adversely
affected.
Failure to
respond to changes in workplace trends and the competitive
landscape may adversely affect our revenue and
profits.
Advances in technology, the globalization of business and shifts
in work styles and behaviors are changing the world of work and
may have a significant impact on the types of workplace products
and services purchased by our customers and the geographic
location of the demand. For example, in recent years, these
trends have resulted in a reduction in the amount of office
floor space allocated per employee, a reduction in size (and
price) of a typical workstation and an increase in work
occurring in a variety of locations beyond the traditional
office. The confluence of these factors could attract new
competitors from outside the traditional office furniture
industry offering products and services which compete with those
offered by us and our dealers. In addition, the traditional
office furniture industry is highly competitive, with a number
of competitors offering similar categories of products. We
compete on a variety of factors, including: brand recognition
and reputation, insight from our research, product design and
features, price, lead time, delivery and service, product
quality, strength of dealers and other distributors and
relationships with customers and key influencers, such as
architects, designers and facility managers. If we are
unsuccessful in developing and offering products which respond
to changes in workplace trends, or we or our dealers are
unsuccessful in competing with existing competitors and new
competitive offerings which could arise from outside our
industry, our revenue and profits may be adversely affected.
8
We may not be
able to successfully develop, implement and manage our
diversification and growth strategies.
Our longer-term success depends on our ability to successfully
develop, implement and manage strategies that will preserve our
position as the worlds largest office furniture
manufacturer, as well as expand our offerings into adjacent and
emerging markets. In particular, our diversification and growth
strategies include:
|
|
|
|
|
translating our research regarding the world of work into
innovative solutions which address market needs,
|
|
|
|
continuing our expansion into adjacent markets such as smaller
companies, healthcare clinical spaces and classrooms,
|
|
|
|
growing our market share in emerging markets such as China,
India and the Middle East,
|
|
|
|
investing in acquisitions and new business ventures and
|
|
|
|
developing new alliances and additional channels of distribution.
|
If these strategies are not sufficient to diversify and expand
our revenue, our results of operations may be adversely affected.
We may be
adversely affected by changes in raw material and commodity
costs.
We procure raw materials (including steel, aluminum, other
metals, wood, particleboard and petroleum-based products) from a
significant number of sources globally. These raw materials are
not rare or unique to our industry. The costs of these
commodities, as well as fuel and energy costs, have fluctuated
significantly in recent years due to changes in global supply
and demand, which can also cause supply interruptions. In the
short-term, rapid increases in raw material and commodity costs
can be very difficult to offset with price increases because of
existing contractual commitments with our customers, and it is
difficult to find effective financial instruments to hedge
against such changes. As a result, our gross margins can be
adversely affected by short-term fluctuations in these costs.
Also, if we are not successful in passing along higher raw
material and commodity costs to our customers over the
longer-term because of competitive pressures, our profitability
could be negatively impacted.
Our global
presence subjects us to risks that may negatively affect our
profitability and financial condition.
We have manufacturing facilities and sales, administrative and
shared services offices in many countries, and as a result, we
are subject to risks associated with doing business globally.
Our success depends on our ability to manage the complexity
associated with designing, developing, manufacturing and selling
our solutions in a variety of countries. Our global presence is
also subject to market risks, which in turn could have an
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition, including:
|
|
|
|
|
differing business practices, cultural factors and regulatory
requirements,
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates and currency controls,
|
|
|
|
political, social and economic instability, natural disasters,
security concerns, including terrorist activity, armed conflict
and civil or military unrest, and global health issues and
|
|
|
|
intellectual property protection challenges.
|
Our continuing
efforts to improve our business model could result in additional
restructuring costs and may result in customer
disruption.
Over the past decade, we have implemented significant
restructuring actions to transform our business through the
reinvention of our industrial system and white collar processes.
While we believe we have made significant progress, we continue
to evolve and optimize our business model to be more
9
flexible and agile in meeting changing demand, and incremental
restructuring actions may be necessary. The success of our
restructuring initiatives is dependent on several factors,
including our ability to manage these actions without disrupting
existing customer commitments. Further, these actions may take
longer than anticipated and may distract management from other
activities, and we may not fully realize the expected benefits
of our restructuring activities, either of which would have a
negative impact on our results of operations.
We are
increasingly reliant on a global network of
suppliers.
Our migration to a less vertically integrated manufacturing
model has increased our dependency on a global network of
suppliers. We are reliant on the timely flow of raw materials,
components and finished goods from third-party suppliers. The
flow of such materials, components and goods may be affected by:
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the availability and quality of raw materials,
|
|
|
|
the financial solvency of our suppliers and their supply chains,
|
|
|
|
disruptions caused by labor activities and
|
|
|
|
damage and loss of production from accidents, natural disasters
and other causes.
|
Any disruptions in the supply and delivery of raw materials,
component parts and finished goods or deficiencies in our
ability to manage our global network of suppliers could have an
adverse impact on our business, operating results or financial
condition.
Disruptions
within our dealer network could adversely affect our
business.
We rely largely on a network of over 650 independent and
company-owned dealers to market, deliver and install our
products to customers. From time to time, we or a dealer may
choose to terminate our relationship, or the dealer could face
financial insolvency or difficulty in transitioning to new
ownership. Our business is influenced by our ability to initiate
and manage new and existing relationships with dealers, and
establishing new dealers in a market can take considerable time
and resources. Disruption of dealer coverage within a specific
local market could have an adverse impact on our business within
the affected market. The loss or termination of a significant
number of dealers or the inability to establish new dealers
could cause difficulties in marketing and distributing our
products and have an adverse effect on our business, operating
results or financial condition. In the event that a dealer in a
strategic market experiences financial difficulty, we may choose
to make financial investments in the dealership which would
reduce the risk of disruption but increase our financial
exposure.
We may be
required to record impairment charges related to goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets which would adversely affect
our results of operations.
Goodwill and other acquired intangible assets with indefinite
lives are not amortized but are evaluated for impairment
annually and whenever an event occurs or circumstances change
such that it is reasonably possible that an impairment may
exist. Poor performance in portions of our business where we
have goodwill or intangible assets, or declines in the market
value of our equity, may result in impairment charges, which
would adversely affect our profitability.
There may be
significant limitations to our utilization of net operating loss
carryforwards to offset future taxable income.
We have deferred tax asset values related to net operating loss
carryforwards (NOLs) totaling $63.5 which reside
primarily in various
non-U.S. jurisdictions
and reflect a $32.6 valuation allowance. We may be unable to
generate sufficient taxable income from future operations in the
applicable jurisdiction or implement tax, business or other
planning strategies to fully utilize the estimated value of our
NOLs. We have NOLs in various currencies that are also subject
to foreign exchange risk, which could reduce
10
the amount we may ultimately realize. Additionally, future
changes in tax laws or interpretations of such tax laws may
limit our ability to fully utilize our NOLs.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments:
|
None.
We have operations at locations throughout the U.S. and
around the world. None of our owned properties are mortgaged or
are held subject to any significant encumbrance. We believe our
facilities are in good operating condition and, at present, are
in excess of that needed to meet volume needs currently and for
the foreseeable future. Our global headquarters is located in
Grand Rapids, Michigan, U.S.A. Our owned and leased principal
manufacturing and distribution center locations with greater
than 50,000 square feet are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment/Category Primarily Supported
|
|
|
Locations
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2011, we closed three owned manufacturing facilities (one
located in Europe, one located in Asia and one located in
the United States) and closed one leased manufacturing facility
located in the United States. In addition, we sold and
subsequently leased back two manufacturing facilities, one in
North America and the other in Asia.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings:
|
We are involved in litigation from time to time in the ordinary
course of our business. Based on known information, we do not
believe we are a party to any lawsuit or proceeding that is
likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
|
|
Item 4.
|
(Removed
and Reserved)
|
11
Supplementary
Item. Executive Officers of the Registrant:
Our executive officers are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Position
|
Sara E. Armbruster
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
Vice President, WorkSpace Futures and Corporate Strategy
|
Mark A. Baker
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Global Operations Officer
|
James P. Hackett
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer, Director
|
Nancy W. Hickey
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer
|
James P. Keane
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
President, Steelcase Group
|
Frank H. Merlotti, Jr.
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
President, Coalesse
|
James G. Mitchell
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
President, Steelcase EMEA
|
Mark T. Mossing
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
|
Lizbeth S. OShaughnessy
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
|
David C. Sylvester
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|
Sara E. Armbruster has been Vice President, WorkSpace
Futures and Corporate Strategy since May 2009.
Ms. Armbruster was Vice President, Corporate Strategy from
2007 to May 2009. Prior to joining Steelcase in 2007,
Ms. Armbruster was employed by Banta Corporation, a
printing and supply chain management services company based in
Menasha, Wisconsin, where she led Bantas strategy and
business development functions, serving as Vice President,
Business Development from 2006 to 2007 and Director, Business
Development from 2003 to 2006.
Mark A. Baker has been Senior Vice President, Global
Operations since September 2004 and has been employed by
Steelcase since 1995.
James P. Hackett has been President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director since December 1994. Mr. Hackett also
serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Northwestern
Mutual Life Insurance Company and the Board of Directors of
Fifth Third Bancorp. Mr. Hackett has been employed by
Steelcase since 1981.
Nancy W. Hickey has been Senior Vice President, Chief
Administrative Officer since November 2001 and also served as
Secretary on an interim basis from March to July 2007.
Ms. Hickey has been employed by Steelcase since 1986.
James P. Keane has been President, Steelcase Group since
October 2006. Mr. Keane was Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer from 2001 to October 2006 and has been
employed by Steelcase since 1997.
Frank H. Merlotti, Jr. has been President, Coalesse
since October 2006 (Coalesse was known as the Premium Group from
2007 to 2008 and the Design Group from 2006 to 2007).
Mr. Merlotti has been employed by Steelcase since 2002, and
from 2002 to October 2006, he held the position of President,
Steelcase North America.
James G. Mitchell has been President, Steelcase EMEA
since April 2011 and was President, Steelcase International from
2004 to April 2011. Mr. Mitchell has been employed by
Steelcase since 1993.
Mark T. Mossing has been Corporate Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer since April 2008 and served as Vice
President, Corporate Controller from 1999 to April 2008.
Mr. Mossing has been employed by Steelcase since 1993.
Lizbeth S. OShaughnessy has been Senior Vice
President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since April 2011
and was Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary from
2007 to April 2011 and Assistant General Counsel from 2000 to
2007. From 2005 to 2007, Ms. OShaughnessy also held
the position of Assistant Secretary. Ms. OShaughnessy
has been employed by Steelcase since 1992.
David C. Sylvester has been Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer since April 2011 and was Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer from 2006 to April 2011 and Vice President,
Global Operations Finance from 2005 to 2006. Mr. Sylvester
has been employed by Steelcase since 1995.
12
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities:
|
Common
Stock
Our Class A Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol SCS. Our Class B
Common Stock is not registered under the Exchange Act or
publicly traded. See Note 14 to the consolidated financial
statements for additional information. As of the close of
business on April 22, 2011, we had outstanding
131,634,818 shares of common stock with
8,311 shareholders of record. Of these amounts,
87,435,440 shares are Class A Common Stock with
8,208 shareholders of record and 44,199,378 shares are
Class B Common Stock with 103 shareholders of record.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
Per Share Price Range
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
$
|
9.47
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.59
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.66
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.23
|
|
Low
|
|
|
$
|
6.35
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.17
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.17
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.27
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
$
|
5.87
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.54
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.68
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.15
|
|
Low
|
|
|
$
|
3.03
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.63
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.98
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.37
|
|
Dividends
The declaration of dividends is subject to the discretion of our
Board of Directors and to compliance with applicable laws.
Dividends in 2011 and 2010 were declared and paid quarterly. The
amount and timing of future dividends depends upon our results
of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, future
business prospects, general business conditions and other
factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant at the
time.
Our global committed, syndicated credit facility contains a
restricted payment covenant which establishes a maximum level of
dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions or payments (such as share
repurchases) we may make in a fiscal year. We are permitted to
make dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions or payments of up to $25 per year
provided we remain compliant with the financial covenants and
other conditions set forth in the credit agreement. We are
permitted to make dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions or payments in excess of $25 in a
fiscal year to the extent that our Liquidity and Leverage Ratio
(as defined in the credit agreement) meet certain thresholds set
forth in the credit agreement. Under this provision, there were
no restrictions on our ability to make dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions; however, our availability under
the credit facility would be reduced if dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions exceeded $154 due to financial
covenant constraints as of February 25, 2011. See
Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dividends Paid
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Total
|
2011
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.6
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
26.9
|
|
13
Fourth Quarter
Share Repurchases
The following table is a summary of share repurchase activity
during Q4 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
Dollar Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
|
Shares that May
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
|
Yet be Purchased
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
|
Under the Plans
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
|
or Programs (1)
|
|
|
|
or Programs
|
|
11/27/1012/31/10
|
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
210.8
|
|
1/1/111/28/11
|
|
|
|
646,441
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.88
|
|
|
|
|
645,900
|
|
|
|
|
203.8
|
|
1/29/112/25/11
|
|
|
|
318,555
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.55
|
|
|
|
|
277,600
|
|
|
|
|
200.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
966,825
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In December 2007, our Board of Directors approved a share
repurchase program permitting the repurchase of up to $250 of
our common stock. This program has no specific expiration date. |
|
(2) |
|
43,325 of these shares were repurchased to satisfy
participants tax withholding obligations upon the vesting
of restricted stock and restricted stock unit grants, pursuant
to the terms of our Incentive Compensation Plan. |
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
|
|
February 29,
|
|
|
|
February 23,
|
|
Financial Highlights
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2008 (1)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Operating Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
2,437.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,291.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,183.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,420.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,097.4
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
717.5
|
|
|
|
|
649.8
|
|
|
|
|
923.1
|
|
|
|
|
1,098.6
|
|
|
|
|
920.9
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
202.8
|
|
|
|
|
113.7
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
|
(31.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
211.4
|
|
|
|
|
124.6
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
133.2
|
|
|
|
|
106.9
|
|
Supplemental Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
$
|
(30.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(34.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(37.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(23.7
|
)
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
Variable life COLI income (loss) (2)
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
|
(41.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
Dividends paid per common share (3)
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.35
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
213.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
527.2
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
350.8
|
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
|
|
|
76.0
|
|
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
Working capital (4)
|
|
|
|
275.5
|
|
|
|
|
222.9
|
|
|
|
|
246.1
|
|
|
|
|
267.5
|
|
|
|
|
602.8
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
1,996.5
|
|
|
|
|
1,677.2
|
|
|
|
|
1,750.0
|
|
|
|
|
2,124.4
|
|
|
|
|
2,399.4
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
546.8
|
|
|
|
|
300.8
|
|
|
|
|
255.2
|
|
|
|
|
258.7
|
|
|
|
|
255.1
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
541.3
|
|
|
|
|
567.0
|
|
|
|
|
520.7
|
|
|
|
|
556.1
|
|
|
|
|
545.5
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
1,278.1
|
|
|
|
|
979.6
|
|
|
|
|
1,017.2
|
|
|
|
|
1,213.5
|
|
|
|
|
1,161.5
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
718.4
|
|
|
|
|
697.6
|
|
|
|
|
732.8
|
|
|
|
|
910.9
|
|
|
|
|
1,237.9
|
|
Statement of Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
$
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
249.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
280.5
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
(254.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(61.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(91.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(51.9
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
211.1
|
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
(132.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(484.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(127.1
|
)
|
14
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 contained
53 weeks. All other years shown contained 52 weeks. |
|
(2) |
|
Variable life COLI income (loss) represents the net returns in
cash surrender value, normal insurance expenses and any death
benefit gains (COLI income) related to our
investments in variable life company-owned life insurance
(COLI) policies. In Q1 2011, we began considering
our investments in variable life COLI policies to be primarily a
source of corporate liquidity. As a result of this change
beginning in Q1 2011, variable life COLI income has been
recorded in Investment income on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. See Note 9 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes special cash dividend of $1.75 per share paid in
January 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Working capital equals current assets minus current liabilities,
as presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations:
|
The following review of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes thereto included
elsewhere within this Report.
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
This item contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. A
non-GAAP financial measure is defined as a numerical
measure of a companys financial performance that excludes
or includes amounts so as to be different than the most directly
comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with
GAAP in the consolidated statements of operations, balance
sheets or statements of cash flows of the company. We have
provided a reconciliation below of non-GAAP financial measures
to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
The non-GAAP financial measures used are: (1) organic
revenue growth, which represents the change in revenue over the
prior year excluding estimated currency translation effects and
the impact of dealer deconsolidations and divestitures and the
IDEO ownership transition (see Note 19 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information), and
(2) adjusted operating income (loss), which represents
operating income (loss) excluding restructuring costs, goodwill
and intangible assets impairment charges and income (loss)
associated with changes in the cash surrender value of variable
life company-owned life insurance policies (variable life
COLI income (loss)). These measures are presented because
management uses this information to monitor and evaluate
financial results and trends. Therefore, management believes
this information is also useful for investors.
15
Financial
Summary
Results of
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
2,437.1
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
2,291.7
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
3,183.7
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
1,693.8
|
|
|
|
|
69.5
|
|
|
|
|
1,619.9
|
|
|
|
|
70.7
|
|
|
|
|
2,236.7
|
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
717.5
|
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
|
|
|
|
649.8
|
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
|
923.1
|
|
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
661.2
|
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
|
648.4
|
|
|
|
|
28.3
|
|
|
|
|
842.9
|
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Interest expense, Investment income and Other income (expense),
net
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
(19.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
(31.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
(17.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Organic Revenue GrowthConsolidated
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Prior year revenue
|
|
|
$
|
2,291.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,183.7
|
|
Dealer deconsolidations and divestitures
|
|
|
|
(63.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22.0
|
)
|
IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
(29.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation effects (1)
|
|
|
|
(21.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(31.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior year revenue, adjusted
|
|
|
|
2,178.7
|
|
|
|
|
3,130.7
|
|
Current year revenue
|
|
|
|
2,437.1
|
|
|
|
|
2,291.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth (decline)
|
|
|
$
|
258.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(839.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth (decline) %
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Currency translation effects represent the net effect of
translating prior year foreign currency revenues using the
average exchange rate on a quarterly basis during the current
year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Adjusted Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Add: Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Less: Variable life COLI income (loss) (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
(41.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
82.1
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
145.2
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In Q1 2011, we began considering our investments in variable
life COLI policies to be primarily a source of corporate
liquidity. As a result of this change beginning in Q1 2011, COLI
income related to our investments in variable life COLI policies
has been recorded in Investment income on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The variable life COLI
income (loss) previously included in operating income is
excluded for comparative purposes. |
Overview
Following a significant reduction in our revenue during 2009 and
2010 in connection with the global economic recession and
downturn in our industry, we began experiencing organic revenue
growth in our business in Q1 2011 as a result of the broader
global economic recovery. This trend strengthened in Q2 2011 as
a result of increased customer project activity and accelerated
in the second half of 2011 when we posted organic revenue growth
over the prior year more broadly across all reporting segments
and in most geographies. This growth is consistent with general
trends in our industry as companies have been increasing
corporate spending.
The organic revenue growth was the primary driver of the
significant increase in adjusted operating income from 2010 to
2011. In addition, our current year results benefited from
previous restructuring activities and other cost reduction
efforts implemented during the downturn, as well as our efforts
to improve the profitability across various businesses,
including PolyVision, the Coalesse Group and Asia. These
benefits were offset in part by the reinstatement of employee
salaries and certain retirement benefits to 2009 levels and
inflation in commodity costs, which increased significantly in
late 2011.
During the downturn in 2009 and 2010, we continued to invest in
our growth initiatives, which we believe will help diversify our
revenue base and grow our revenues at a faster rate than we
would otherwise experience coming out of the downtown. Our
growth initiatives include expanding our offerings and
penetration in certain vertical markets (such as healthcare,
education and government) and emerging geographical markets
(such as China, India and the Middle East), as well as
developing new products, applications and experiences to meet
the evolving business needs of our global customer base.
From 2009 through 2011, in order to reduce our costs and
continue the reinvention of our industrial model, we implemented
a number of restructuring actions which resulted in more than
$100 of annualized fixed cost reductions by the end of 2011. In
addition, we are in the process of closing three additional
plants in North America which is expected to reduce our
annualized costs by an additional $35 once completed over the
next 18 months. We also took a number of steps to improve
our operating fitness and organize our business as a globally
integrated enterprise, including the creation and increased
utilization of captive shared service centers in Malaysia and
Mexico. We expect to be able to preserve these cost reductions
and hold our other fixed costs relatively flat as our industry
continues to recover and our revenue grows.
2011 compared
to 2010
We recorded net income of $20.4 in 2011 compared to a net loss
of $13.6 in 2010. The increase in net income was driven by
operating leverage from organic revenue growth across all of our
reporting segments and benefits from restructuring activities
and other cost reduction efforts, offset in part by lower
variable life COLI income and an income tax charge of $11.4
resulting from the U.S. healthcare reform legislation
enacted in Q1 2011.
Operating income grew to $51.5 in 2011 compared to an operating
loss of $11.5 in 2010. The 2011 adjusted operating income of
$82.1 represented an improvement of $91.8 compared to the prior
year primarily due to operating leverage from organic revenue
growth, benefits from restructuring
17
activities and other cost reduction efforts and a gain from the
IDEO ownership transition totaling $9 (net of incremental
variable compensation expense), partially offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
higher compensation costs of $12 related to the reinstatement of
employee salaries and certain retirement benefits to 2009
levels and
|
|
|
|
increased commodity costs of approximately $10.
|
Revenue for 2011 was $2,437.1 compared to $2,291.7 for 2010,
representing organic revenue growth of 12% after adjusting for
dealer deconsolidations, the IDEO ownership transition and
currency translation effects. The organic revenue growth was
broad-based, with organic growth of 12% in the North America
segment, 14% in the International segment and 8% in the Other
category.
Cost of sales decreased to 69.5% of revenue in 2011, a
120 basis point improvement compared to 2010. Higher
absorption of fixed costs associated with organic revenue growth
and benefits from restructuring activities and other cost
reduction efforts were partially offset by the reclassification
of variable life COLI income, which beginning in Q1 2011 is
reported in Investment income, and increased commodity
costs.
Operating expenses increased by $12.8 in 2011 compared to 2010.
The increase was primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
higher variable compensation expense of $21 related to our
Economic Value Added (EVA)-based compensation plans,
|
|
|
|
variable life COLI income in the prior year of $13.8,
|
|
|
|
higher compensation costs of $9 related to the reinstatement of
employee salaries and certain retirement benefits to 2009
levels and
|
|
|
|
increases in other operating costs.
|
These increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
a reduction of $31.0 from deconsolidations,
|
|
|
|
a gain of $13.2 from the IDEO ownership transition,
|
|
|
|
favorable currency translation effects of approximately
$7 and
|
|
|
|
benefits from restructuring activities and other cost reduction
efforts.
|
We recorded restructuring costs of $30.6 in 2011 compared to
$34.9 in 2010. The 2011 charges primarily related to the
reorganization of our European manufacturing operations on the
basis of specialized competencies and several smaller actions to
consolidate manufacturing facilities and reorganize other areas
of our business. In addition, Q4 2011 included a $10.6 gain
related to the sale and leaseback of a facility in Canada offset
by $10.1 of restructuring costs associated with the planned
closure of three additional manufacturing facilities in North
America. See further discussion and detail of these items in the
Segment Disclosure analysis below and in Note 20 to
the consolidated financial statements.
Our 2011 effective tax rate was 60%, significantly higher than
the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%. The difference
was primarily driven by a tax charge of $11.4 related to a
reduction in deferred tax assets related to the
U.S. healthcare reform legislation enacted in Q1 2011. See
Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
2010 compared
to 2009
We recorded a net loss of $13.6 in 2010 compared to a net loss
of $11.7 in 2009. The year over year comparison is significantly
impacted by results from variable life COLI, which generated
significant income in 2010 compared to significant losses in
2009. 2009 also included $65.2 of goodwill and intangible asset
impairment charges. Beyond variable life COLI income and prior
year impairment
18
charges, the 2010 deterioration was primarily driven by lower
volume, which was partially offset by benefits from
restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts, lower
commodity costs and temporary reductions in employee salaries
and retirement benefits.
Operating income decreased by $12.5 in 2010 compared to 2009.
The 2010 adjusted operating loss of $9.7 represented a decline
of $154.9 compared to the prior year due to the reduction in
revenue, partially offset by benefits from restructuring
activities and other cost reduction efforts, lower commodity
costs and temporary reductions in employee salaries and
retirement benefits.
Our revenue decreased $892.0 or 28.0% in 2010 compared to 2009,
representing an organic revenue decline of 27%. The global
economic slowdown and turmoil in the capital markets had the
effect of significantly decreasing the demand for office
furniture in 2010. 2010 revenue declines were broad-based,
significantly affecting almost all of our geographies, vertical
markets and product categories. However, percentage declines
compared to the prior year began to moderate in Q4 2010, as we
entered this downturn beginning in Q3 2009.
Cost of sales increased to 70.7% of revenue in 2010, a
40 basis point deterioration compared to 2009. The
deterioration was driven largely by lower absorption of fixed
costs associated with the revenue decline, partially mitigated
by benefits from restructuring activities and other cost
reduction efforts. The deterioration was also offset by
approximately:
|
|
|
|
|
210 basis points due to lower commodity costs,
|
|
|
|
190 basis points due to an increase in variable life COLI
income and
|
|
|
|
80 basis points related to temporary reductions in employee
salaries and retirement benefits.
|
Operating expenses decreased by $194.5 compared to 2009. The
decrease was primarily due to benefits from restructuring
activities and other cost reduction efforts and the following:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in variable life COLI income of $32,
|
|
|
|
a reduction of $27 in variable compensation expense,
|
|
|
|
temporary reductions in employee salaries and retirement
benefits of $21,
|
|
|
|
an $8.5 impairment charge in 2009 related to an asset classified
as held for sale, and
|
|
|
|
favorable currency translation effects of $7.
|
There were no goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
in 2010. Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges in
2009 were primarily related to PolyVision, which is included in
the Other category. These charges were primarily due to the
impact of the substantial decline in our stock price and market
capitalization. As part of our annual goodwill impairment
testing, we prepared a reconciliation of the fair value of our
reporting units to our adjusted market capitalization as of
February 27, 2009. Through this reconciliation process, we
determined the fair value of PolyVision (using a discounted cash
flow method) was less than its carrying value, resulting in
non-cash impairment charges of $63.0 in Q4 2009.
We recorded restructuring costs of $34.9 in 2010 compared to
$37.9 in 2009. The 2010 charges primarily related to the
consolidation of additional manufacturing and distribution
facilities and employee termination costs related to the
reduction of our global white-collar workforce. See further
discussion and detail of these items in the Segment
Disclosure analysis below and in Note 20 to the
consolidated financial statements.
Our 2010 effective tax rate was favorably impacted by
significant non-taxable income associated with increases in cash
surrender value of COLI and negatively impacted by increases in
valuation allowances of $8.9. See Note 15 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information.
19
Interest Expense,
Investment Income and Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Interest Expense, Investment Income and
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
$
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(18.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(17.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
Other income (expense), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Miscellaneous, net
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense and other income (expense), net
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(19.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning in Q1 2011, Investment income includes gains
and losses from variable life COLI policies. See Note 9 to
the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates increased in the
current year primarily due to an increase in equity in earnings
of our unconsolidated dealer relationships. See Note 11 to
the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Segment
Disclosure
We operate on a worldwide basis within North America and
International reportable segments plus an Other
category. Our Other category includes the Coalesse Group,
PolyVision and IDEO (through Q3 2011). Unallocated
corporate expenses are reported as Corporate. Additional
information about our reportable segments is contained in
Item 1: Business and Note 18 to the
consolidated financial statements included within this report.
North
America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
North America
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
1,322.2
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
1,237.4
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
1,740.0
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
940.9
|
|
|
|
|
71.2
|
|
|
|
|
877.1
|
|
|
|
|
70.9
|
|
|
|
|
1,256.4
|
|
|
|
|
72.2
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
375.7
|
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
|
353.3
|
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
|
469.6
|
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
318.4
|
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
|
|
|
293.5
|
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
|
394.5
|
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
$
|
56.5
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
56.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Organic Revenue GrowthNorth America
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Prior year revenue
|
|
|
$
|
1,237.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,740.0
|
|
Dealer deconsolidations and divestitures
|
|
|
|
(63.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)
|
Currency translation effects (1)
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior year revenue, adjusted
|
|
|
|
1,184.4
|
|
|
|
|
1,719.0
|
|
Current year revenue
|
|
|
|
1,322.2
|
|
|
|
|
1,237.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth (decline)
|
|
|
$
|
137.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
(481.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth (decline) %
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Currency translation effects represent the net effect of
translating prior year foreign currency revenues using the
average exchange rate on a quarterly basis during the current
year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Adjusted Operating IncomeNorth America
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
$
|
56.5
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
56.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Add: Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Less: Variable life COLI income (loss) (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
(40.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income
|
|
|
$
|
62.9
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
131.3
|
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In Q1 2011, we began considering our investments in variable
life COLI policies to be primarily a source of corporate
liquidity. As a result of this change beginning in Q1 2011, COLI
income related to our investments in variable life COLI policies
has been recorded in Investment income on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The variable life COLI
income (loss) previously included in operating income is
excluded for comparative purposes. |
2011 compared
to 2010
Operating income in North America remained relatively flat in
2011 compared to 2010, which included $32.9 of variable life
COLI income. Adjusted operating income increased by $29.0,
primarily driven by operating leverage from organic revenue
growth and benefits from restructuring activities and other cost
reduction efforts, partially offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
higher compensation costs of $10 related to the reinstatement of
employee salaries and certain retirement benefits to 2009 levels,
|
|
|
|
incremental variable compensation expense of approximately $6
related to a gain on sale of a facility, which was recorded as a
restructuring item, and a gain from the IDEO ownership
transition, which was recorded in Corporate,
|
|
|
|
current year charges related to a product recall and an
impairment related to an asset held for sale totaling $8 and
|
|
|
|
increased commodity costs of approximately $8.
|
North America revenue represented 54.3% of consolidated revenue
in 2011. Revenue for 2011 was $1,322.2 compared to $1,237.4 in
2010, representing organic revenue growth of 12% after adjusting
for dealer deconsolidations and currency translation effects.
Revenue growth was broad-based with notable vertical market
growth reflected in financial services, technical/professional,
higher education, healthcare and government. In addition,
seating revenue growth was the strongest across our product
categories.
21
Cost of sales increased to 71.2% of revenue in 2011, a
30 basis point deterioration compared to 2010. Excluding
the 150 basis point favorable impact of variable life COLI
income in 2010, cost of sales improved by 120 basis points,
which was largely driven by higher absorption of fixed costs
associated with organic revenue growth and benefits from
restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts,
partially offset by higher commodity costs and a product
specific warranty charge related to a retrofit project.
Operating expenses increased by $24.9 in 2011 compared to 2010
primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
higher variable compensation expense of $16 related to our
EVA-based compensation plans,
|
|
|
|
variable life COLI income in 2010 of $13.6 and
|
|
|
|
higher compensation costs of $7 related to the reinstatement of
employee salaries and certain retirement benefits to 2009 levels.
|
These increases were partially offset by a reduction of $20.6
from dealer deconsolidations as well as benefits of
restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts.
Restructuring costs of $6.4 incurred in 2011 primarily related
to the consolidation of manufacturing facilities. In addition,
Q4 2011 included a $10.6 gain related to the sale and leaseback
of a facility in Canada offset by $10.1 of restructuring costs
associated with the planned closure of three additional
manufacturing facilities in North America as part of our ongoing
efforts to improve the fitness of our business and strengthen
the Companys long-term competitiveness. We expect to move
production within these facilities to other Steelcase locations
in North America over the next 18 months. We estimate the
cash restructuring costs associated with these actions will be
approximately $45 million, with approximately
$30 million related to workforce reductions and
approximately $15 million related to costs associated with
manufacturing consolidation and production moves. We anticipate
annualized savings from these actions to be approximately $35
when fully implemented in 2013.
2010 compared
to 2009
Operating income in the North America segment decreased by $10.3
in 2010 compared to 2009. The 2010 adjusted operating income of
$33.9 represented a decline of $97.4 compared to the prior year
primarily due to the reduction in volume, mostly offset by lower
commodity costs, benefits from restructuring activities and
other cost reduction efforts and temporary reductions in
employee salaries and retirement benefits.
North America revenue, which accounted for 54.0% of consolidated
2010 revenue, decreased by $502.6 or 28.9% from 2009,
representing an organic revenue decline of 28% primarily due to
decreased volume across most of our vertical markets (except for
the U.S. Federal government) and product categories. The
revenue declines within higher education, state and local
government and healthcare were less than the declines
experienced in other vertical markets. In addition, the revenue
decline in the financial services vertical market was lower than
the average decline in 2010, as this vertical market entered the
downturn earlier than other markets and experienced a
significant decline in 2009.
Cost of sales as a percent of revenue decreased 130 basis
points compared to the prior year. 2010 results benefited from
restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts. The
improvement was also driven by approximately:
|
|
|
|
|
350 basis points of a favorable impact related to an
increase in variable life COLI income,
|
|
|
|
300 basis points due to lower commodity costs and
|
|
|
|
130 basis points related to temporary reductions in
employee salaries and retirement benefits.
|
These benefits more than offset the negative effects of lower
fixed cost absorption related to lower volume.
22
Operating expenses decreased by $101.0 in 2010 compared to 2009
primarily due to benefits from restructuring activities and
other cost reduction efforts and the following:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in variable life COLI income of $31,
|
|
|
|
temporary reductions in employee salaries and retirement
benefits of $17,
|
|
|
|
lower variable compensation expense of $14 and
|
|
|
|
non-cash impairment charges of $12 in 2009.
|
Restructuring costs of $10.4 in 2010 primarily consisted of
employee termination costs related to the reduction of our
white-collar workforce and the closure of manufacturing
facilities.
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Statement of Operations DataInternational
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
698.9
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
641.6
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
922.2
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
490.7
|
|
|
|
|
70.2
|
|
|
|
|
454.1
|
|
|
|
|
70.8
|
|
|
|
|
629.1
|
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
189.5
|
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
|
176.0
|
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
|
292.8
|
|
|
|
|
31.8
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
201.1
|
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
|
204.9
|
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
|
|
|
250.1
|
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(35.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Organic Revenue GrowthInternational
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Prior year revenue
|
|
|
$
|
641.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
922.2
|
|
Dealer deconsolidations and divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
Currency translation effects (1)
|
|
|
|
(31.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(28.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior year revenue, adjusted
|
|
|
|
610.6
|
|
|
|
|
889.2
|
|
Current year revenue
|
|
|
|
698.9
|
|
|
|
|
641.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth
|
|
|
$
|
88.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
(247.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth %
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Currency translation effects represent the net effect of
translating prior year foreign currency revenues using the
average exchange rate on a quarterly basis during the current
year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Adjusted Operating Income (Loss)International
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(35.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Add: Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Variable life COLI income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(17.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
43.3
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
2011 compared
to 2010
International reported an operating loss of $13.9 in 2011
compared to an operating loss of $35.5 in 2010. Adjusted
operating income of $7.1 represents an improvement of $24.5
compared to 2010. Overall, the profit improvement was primarily
driven by operating leverage from organic revenue growth and
benefits from restructuring activities and other cost reduction
efforts, offset in part by higher commodity costs and other
operating costs.
Our results in the United Kingdom continued to be negatively
affected by unfavorable currency impacts, and we continued to
fund our expansionary efforts in China and India. In the
aggregate, these businesses reported an operating loss of
approximately $10 in 2011, $24 in 2010 and $19 in 2009.
International revenue represented 28.7% of consolidated revenue
in 2011. Revenue for 2011 was $698.9 compared to $641.6 in 2010,
representing organic revenue growth of 14% after adjusting for
currency translation effects. During 2011, all regions reported
organic revenue growth, with notable increases in Germany, Asia
Pacific, Latin America and Spain.
Cost of sales decreased to 70.2% of revenue in 2011, a
60 basis point improvement compared to 2010. The
improvement was mainly due to higher absorption of fixed costs
associated with organic revenue growth and benefits from
restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts,
offset in part by higher commodity costs.
2011 operating expenses decreased by $3.8 due to benefits
from restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts
and favorable currency translation effects of approximately $7,
offset by higher variable compensation expense related to our
EVA-based compensation plans and higher bad debt charges.
Restructuring costs of $21.0 incurred in 2011 primarily related
to the project to reorganize our European manufacturing
operations. We expect to incur a total of approximately $21 of
cash restructuring costs in connection with this project, with
the majority relating to workforce reductions and some
additional costs for manufacturing consolidation and production
moves. The total estimated cost is slightly higher than our
previous estimates because more employees than anticipated
accepted the severance offer. While the estimated costs have
increased, these additional departures will provide greater
staffing flexibility at our manufacturing facilities. We
anticipate annualized savings from these actions to be
approximately $8 when fully implemented by the end of Q1 2012.
2010 compared
to 2009
International reported an operating loss of $35.5 in 2010
compared to operating income of $41.0 in 2009. The adjusted
operating loss of $17.4 represented a decrease of $60.7 compared
to the prior year primarily due to a significant decline in
revenue. Cost reduction efforts were only able to offset a
portion of the negative effect of lower volume, as the pace of
cost structure changes in our larger International markets was
tempered by the process of negotiating with the related
workers councils.
International revenue, which accounted for 28.0% of consolidated
2010 revenue, declined by $280.6 or 30.4%, representing an
organic revenue decline of 28%. The decrease in revenue was
primarily due to the impact of the global economic slowdown on
the demand for office furniture across all International
markets. The 2010 revenue percentage declines within China,
Eastern Europe, the United Kingdom and Latin America were deeper
than those experienced in other geographic regions.
Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue increased by
260 basis points in 2010 compared to 2009. The 2010
deterioration was almost entirely due to lower fixed cost
absorption related to lower volume, partially offset by benefits
from restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts.
The deterioration was also partially offset by approximately
120 basis points related to lower commodity costs.
Operating expenses decreased by $45.2 compared to 2009 primarily
due to benefits from restructuring activities and other cost
reduction efforts, a reduction in variable compensation expense
of $8 and favorable currency translation effects of $7.
24
Restructuring costs of $18.1 incurred in 2010 primarily
consisted of employee termination costs related to workforce
reductions, mainly in Europe, as well as consolidation of
manufacturing in Asia.
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Statement of Operations DataOther
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
416.0
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
412.7
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
521.5
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
262.2
|
|
|
|
|
63.0
|
|
|
|
|
288.7
|
|
|
|
|
70.0
|
|
|
|
|
351.2
|
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
152.3
|
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
|
120.5
|
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
|
160.7
|
|
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
127.6
|
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
|
132.2
|
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
|
|
|
172.9
|
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(14.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(79.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(15.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Organic Revenue GrowthOther
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Prior year revenue
|
|
|
$
|
412.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
521.5
|
|
IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
(29.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation effects (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior year revenue, adjusted
|
|
|
|
383.7
|
|
|
|
|
521.5
|
|
Current year revenue
|
|
|
|
416.0
|
|
|
|
|
412.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth
|
|
|
$
|
32.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
(108.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth %
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Currency translation effects represent the net effect of
translating prior year foreign currency revenues using the
average exchange rate on a quarterly basis during the current
year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Adjusted Operating Income (Loss)Other
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(14.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(79.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(15.2
|
)%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Add: Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Less: Variable life COLI income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
26.2
|
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 compared
to 2010
Our Other category includes the Coalesse Group, PolyVision and
IDEO (through Q3 2011). Operating income in the Other category
increased by $37.6 in 2011 compared to 2010. Adjusted operating
income improved by $34.4 primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
operational improvements and business mix within the Coalesse
group,
|
|
|
|
improvements at PolyVision as a result of growth in higher
margin Technology and Surfaces product categories and benefits
from the 2010 exit of lower margin businesses in the U.S.,
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
benefits from restructuring activities and other cost reduction
efforts and
|
|
|
|
revenue growth at IDEO through Q3 2011.
|
2011 revenue in the Other category increased by $3.3
compared to 2010, representing organic growth of 8% after
adjusting for the IDEO ownership transition. The Coalesse Group
and PolyVision both experienced single digit revenue growth;
however, excluding the impact of businesses exited in 2010,
PolyVision revenue increased by 17%. IDEO experienced a
significant increase in revenue through Q3 2011 compared to
the same period last year as a result of a number of large
consulting projects.
Cost of sales in the Other category as a percent of revenue
improved by 700 basis points compared to 2010 primarily due
to:
|
|
|
|
|
benefits from restructuring activities, operational improvements
and business mix within the Coalesse Group and
|
|
|
|
improvements at PolyVision as a result of growth in higher
margin Technology and Surfaces product categories and benefits
from the 2010 exit of lower margin businesses in the U.S.
|
Operating expenses in the Other category decreased by $4.6 due
to $10.4 from the IDEO deconsolidation in Q4 2011 offset by
higher variable compensation expense related to our EVA-based
compensation plans.
Restructuring costs of $3.2 in 2011 primarily related to the
consolidation of manufacturing facilities.
On December 14, 2010, certain members of the management of
IDEO who collectively owned 20% of IDEO purchased an additional
60% equity interest in IDEO pursuant to an agreement entered
into during 2008. We retained a 20% equity interest in IDEO, and
we expect to continue our collaborative relationship. This
transaction generated $30 of cash and resulted in a Q4 2011
pre-tax gain of $9, net of incremental variable compensation
expense. In Q4 2011, we deconsolidated the operations of IDEO
and recorded our share of IDEOs earnings as equity in
earnings of unconsolidated affiliates in Other income
(expense), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
See Note 19 consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
2010 compared
to 2009
The Other category reported an operating loss of $14.6 in 2010
compared to an operating loss of $79.3 in 2009. The adjusted
operating loss represented a decline of $5.6 compared to the
prior year primarily due to the revenue decline, offset by
benefits from restructuring activities and other cost reduction
efforts and temporary reductions in employee salaries and
retirement benefits.
2010 revenue decreased by $108.8 or 20.9% compared to 2009.
The Coalesse Group experienced a 29% decline, while IDEO and
PolyVision posted much lower revenue declines of 13% and 11%,
respectively.
Cost of sales as a percent of revenue increased by
270 basis points in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily as a
result of lower fixed cost absorption related to lower volume.
The negative volume effect was partially offset by benefits from
restructuring activities and other cost reduction efforts and
lower commodity costs, as well as initial benefits from the exit
of the final portion of the PolyVision public-bid contractor
whiteboard fabrication business in North America.
Operating expenses decreased by $40.7 compared to 2009 primarily
due to benefits from restructuring activities and other cost
reduction efforts, lower variable compensation expense and
temporary reductions in employee salaries and retirement
benefits. There were no goodwill and intangible assets
impairment charges in 2010.
Restructuring costs of $6.4 in 2010 primarily related to the
closure of two manufacturing facilities: one within the Coalesse
Group and one at PolyVision.
26
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
February 27,
|
Statement of Operations DataCorporate
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
$
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately 82% of corporate expenses were charged to the
operating segments in 2011, 2010 and 2009 as part of a corporate
allocation. Unallocated portions of these expenses are
considered general corporate costs and are reported as
Corporate. Corporate costs include unallocated portions of
executive costs and shared service functions such as information
technology, human resources, finance, legal, research and
development and corporate facilities.
2011 operating expenses include a $13.2 gain from the
ownership transition of IDEO. Related variable compensation
expense was allocated among the North America and International
segments, the Other category and Corporate. Excluding this gain,
the increase in Corporate operating expenses primarily relates
to higher variable compensation expense related to our EVA-based
incentive compensation plans in the current year.
Corporate costs decreased in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily due
to temporary reductions in employee salaries and retirement
benefits, lower variable compensation expense and other
reductions in discretionary spending.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
Liquidity
Based on current business conditions, we target a minimum of
$100 in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments to
fund
day-to-day
operations, to provide available liquidity for investments in
growth initiatives and as a cushion against economic volatility.
Our actual cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment
balances will fluctuate from quarter to quarter as we plan for
and manage certain seasonal disbursements, particularly the
annual payment of accrued variable compensation and retirement
plan contributions in Q1 of each fiscal year, when applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Primary Liquidity Sources
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
350.8
|
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
Variable life COLI
|
|
|
|
110.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Availability under credit facilities
|
|
|
|
165.7
|
|
|
|
|
132.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total primary liquidity sources
|
|
|
$
|
769.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
312.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of February 25, 2011, we held a total of $493.0 in cash
and cash equivalents and short-term investments, including
$246.9 from the net proceeds received in Q4 2011 from the
issuance of unsecured unsubordinated senior notes, due in
February 2021. The net proceeds were invested in short-term
managed investment accounts and are expected to be used,
together with available cash on hand, to repay the outstanding
$250 aggregate principal amount of our 6.5% senior notes
due August 15, 2011. There are no restrictions on the use
or access of these assets. See Note 12 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
Of our total cash and cash equivalents, approximately 63% was
located in the U.S. and the remaining 37% was located
outside of the U.S., primarily in France, Asia and Canada. The
majority of our short-term investments are maintained in the
U.S. in a managed investment portfolio, which primarily
consists of U.S. agency debt securities,
U.S. government debt securities, corporate debt securities
and municipal debt securities.
27
In Q1 2011, we began considering investments in variable life
COLI policies to be primarily a source of corporate liquidity.
Accordingly, during Q1 2011, we set the allocation of our
investments in variable life COLI policies to a more
conservative profile with a heavier weighting to fixed income
securities. In addition, our investments in whole life COLI
policies represent a potential source of liquidity. The whole
life and variable life policies are recorded at their net cash
surrender values. We believe the financial strength of the
issuing insurance companies associated with our variable and
whole life COLI policies are sufficient to meet their
obligations to us. See Note 9 to the consolidated financial
statements for more information.
Availability under credit facilities may be reduced by the use
of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments for
purposes other than the repayment of debt as a result of
constraints related to our maximum leverage ratio covenant. See
Liquidity Facilities for more information.
The following table summarizes our consolidated statements of
cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Cash Flow Data
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net cash flow provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
$
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
104.2
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
(254.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(61.1
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
211.1
|
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
(132.2
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(96.3
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
|
213.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by
(used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Cash Flow DataOperating Activities
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(11.7
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
64.4
|
|
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
|
|
|
87.3
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.2
|
|
Changes in accounts receivable, inventories, and accounts
payable, net of deconsolidation
|
|
|
|
(59.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
61.9
|
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
Changes in cash surrender value of COLI
|
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
Changes in deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
|
(18.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
Changes in employee compensation liabilities
|
|
|
|
41.7
|
|
|
|
|
(62.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(52.5
|
)
|
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities, net of
deconsolidation
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
(20.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(67.3
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
$
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in cash provided by operating activities in 2011
compared to cash used in operating activities in 2010 was
primarily due to cash generated from net income and the receipt
of a U.S. income tax refund, partially offset by a use of
cash for working capital due to the increase in revenue.
28
Cash provided by
(used in) investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Cash Flow DataInvesting Activities
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
$
|
(46.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(35.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(83.0
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Proceeds from IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
|
(335.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25.6
|
)
|
Liquidations of investments
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Business divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
$
|
(254.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(61.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures in 2011 were primarily related to
investments in product development in North America and
International, and included progress payments totaling $10.2
towards a replacement corporate aircraft. We received proceeds
from the IDEO ownership transition and the sale of facilities in
Canada and Malaysia. Purchases of investments include the
short-term investment of the net proceeds from the issuance of
senior notes in Q4 2011.
Cash provided by
(used in) financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Cash Flow DataFinancing Activities
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Borrowings (repayments) of short-term and long-term debt, net
|
|
|
$
|
243.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
45.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2.6
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
(21.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(71.3
|
)
|
Common stock repurchases, net of issuances
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(58.7
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
$
|
211.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
(132.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Q4 2011, we issued $250 in unsecured unsubordinated senior
notes, due in February 2021. Proceeds, net of bond discount and
issuance costs, totaled $246.9 and were invested in short-term
managed investment accounts. We expect to use the net proceeds,
together with available cash on hand, to repay the outstanding
$250 aggregate principal amount of our 6.5% senior notes
due August 15, 2011. See Note 12 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
The primary use of cash in financing activities continues to
relate to dividends paid on our common stock.
We paid dividends of $0.04 per common share during all quarters
in 2011 and the last three quarters of 2010 and $0.08 per common
share during the first quarter of 2010. We paid dividends of
$0.08 per share in Q4 2009 and $0.15 per share in Q1, Q2 and Q3
2009. On March 23, 2011 our Board of Directors declared a
dividend of $0.06 per common share to be paid in Q1 2012.
During 2011, 2010 and 2009, we made common stock repurchases of
$10.8, $4.6 and $59.2, respectively, all of which related to our
Class A Common Stock. As of February 25, 2011, we had
$200.9 of remaining availability under the $250 share
repurchase program approved by our Board of Directors in Q4
2008. We have no outstanding share repurchase commitments.
29
Share repurchases of Class A Common Stock to enable
participants to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon vesting
of restricted stock and restricted stock units, pursuant to the
terms of our Incentive Compensation Plan, were $0.7, $0.4 and
$1.7 in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Capital
Resources
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
We are contingently liable under loan and lease guarantees for
certain Steelcase dealers and joint ventures in the event of
default or non-performance of the financial repayment of a
liability. In certain cases, we also guarantee completion of
contracts by our dealers. Due to the contingent nature of
guarantees, the full value of the guarantees is not recorded on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets; however, when necessary we
record reserves to cover potential losses. See Note 17 to
the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Contractual
Obligations
Our contractual obligations as of February 25, 2011 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Long-term debt and short-term borrowings
|
|
|
$
|
546.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
255.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
281.2
|
|
Estimated interest on debt obligations
|
|
|
|
174.6
|
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
34.6
|
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
|
163.2
|
|
|
|
|
41.1
|
|
|
|
|
60.9
|
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
Committed capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
37.4
|
|
|
|
|
37.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefit and compensation obligations
|
|
|
|
250.8
|
|
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
|
43.9
|
|
|
|
|
38.2
|
|
|
|
|
85.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
1,200.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
466.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
149.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
112.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
472.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated debt as of February 25, 2011 was $546.8.
Of our total debt, $249.9 is in the form of term notes due in
August 2011, $249.9 is in the form of term notes due in February
2021 and $43.1 is related to financing secured by our two
corporate aircraft.
We have commitments related to certain sales offices, showrooms,
warehouses and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases
that expire at various dates through 2021. Minimum payments
under operating leases, net of sublease rental income, are
presented in the contractual obligations table above.
Committed capital expenditures represent obligations we have
related to property, plant and equipment purchases and include
an outstanding commitment of $19.8 to purchase one corporate
aircraft that is intended to replace an existing aircraft.
We define purchase obligations as non-cancelable signed
contracts to purchase goods or services beyond the needs of
meeting current backlog or production.
Other liabilities represent obligations for foreign exchange
forward contracts.
Employee benefit obligations represent contributions and benefit
payments expected to be made for our post-retirement, pension,
deferred compensation, defined contribution, severance
arrangements and variable compensation plans. Our obligations
related to post-retirement benefit plans are not contractual and
the plans could be amended at the discretion of the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors. We limited our disclosure
of contributions and benefit payments to 10 years as
information beyond this time period was not available. See
Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
30
The contractual obligations table above is current as of
February 25, 2011. The amounts of these obligations could
change materially over time as new contracts or obligations are
initiated and existing contracts or obligations are terminated
or modified.
Liquidity
Facilities
Our total liquidity facilities as of February 25, 2011 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
Liquidity Facilities
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Global committed bank facility
|
|
|
$
|
125.0
|
|
Various uncommitted lines
|
|
|
|
43.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit lines available
|
|
|
|
168.8
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings outstanding
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available capacity
|
|
|
$
|
165.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our $125 global committed, syndicated credit facility expires in
Q4 2013. As of February 25, 2011, there were no borrowings
outstanding under the facility. The facility requires us to
satisfy financial covenants including a maximum leverage ratio
covenant and a minimum interest coverage ratio covenant.
Additionally, the facility requires us to comply with certain
other terms and conditions, including a restricted payment
covenant which establishes a maximum level of dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions or payments (such as share
repurchases) we may make in a fiscal year. As of
February 25, 2011, we were in compliance with all covenants
under the facility. See Note 12 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
The various uncommitted lines may be changed or cancelled by the
banks at any time. Outstanding borrowings on uncommitted
facilities of $3.0 as of February 25, 2011 were primarily
related to short-term liquidity management within our
International segment. In addition, we have a revolving letter
of credit agreement for $15.5 of which $14.5 was utilized
primarily related to our self-insured workers compensation
programs as of February 25, 2011. There were no draws on
our standby letters of credit during 2011. See Note 12 to
the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Total consolidated debt as of February 25, 2011 was $546.8.
Our debt primarily consists of $249.9 in term notes due in Q2
2012 (2012 Notes) with an effective interest rate of
6.3% and $249.9 in term notes due in Q4 2021 (2021
Notes) with an effective interest rate of 6.6%. The 2012
Notes are classified as short-term in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets as they are due within one year. The 2021 Notes were
issued in Q4 2011, and the proceeds of the notes have been
invested in short-term investments. It is our intention to use
these funds and other available cash on hand to pay off the 2012
Notes when they come due. In addition, we have a $43.1 term loan
due in Q2 2017 at a floating interest rate based on
30-day LIBOR
plus 3.35%. The term notes are unsecured, the term loan is
secured by our two corporate aircraft, and neither the term
notes nor the term loan contain financial covenants or are
cross-defaulted to other debt facilities. See Note 12 to
the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Liquidity
Outlook
Our current cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment
balances, funds available from COLI, funds available under our
credit facilities and cash generated from future operations are
expected to be sufficient to finance our known or foreseeable
liquidity needs. We believe there are indicators that most
geographies and markets around the world have emerged from the
adverse impacts of the global economic recession, although the
strength and continuity of the economic recovery remain
uncertain which may continue to challenge our level of cash
generation from operations. We continue to maintain a
conservative approach to liquidity and maintain flexibility over
significant uses of cash including our capital expenditures and
discretionary operating expenses.
31
It is our current intention to repay the 2012 Notes at or before
maturity with the proceeds from the 2021 Notes and other
available cash on hand. Our other significant funding
requirements include operating expenses, non-cancelable
operating lease obligations, capital expenditures, variable
compensation and retirement plan contributions, dividend
payments and debt service obligations.
We expect capital expenditures to total approximately $70 in
2012 compared to $46 in 2011. This amount includes progress
payments associated with a replacement corporate aircraft
totaling $20 and approximately $10 in spending on corporate
facilities as a result of campus consolidation. We closely
manage capital spending to ensure we are making investments that
we believe will sustain our business and preserve our ability to
introduce innovative new products.
In Q4 2011, we announced our intention to close three additional
manufacturing facilities in North America as part of our
ongoing efforts to improve the fitness of our business and
strengthen the Companys long-term competitiveness. We
estimate the cash restructuring costs associated with these
actions will be approximately $45 to be paid over the next
18 months related to workforce reductions and costs
associated with manufacturing consolidation and production
moves. We anticipate annualized savings from these actions to be
approximately $35 when fully implemented in 2013.
On March 23, 2011, we announced a quarterly dividend on our
common stock of $0.06 per share, or $7.9 to be paid in Q1 2012.
Future dividends will be subject to approval by our Board of
Directors.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Our
consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. These principles require the use
of estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported and
disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Although these estimates are based on
historical data and managements knowledge of current
events and actions it may undertake in the future, actual
results may differ from the estimates if different conditions
occur. The accounting estimates that typically involve a higher
degree of judgment and complexity are listed and explained
below. These estimates were discussed with the Audit Committee
of the Board of Directors and affect all segments of the Company.
Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price
and the related underlying tangible and identifiable intangible
net asset values resulting from business acquisitions. Annually
in Q4, or earlier if conditions indicate it is necessary, the
carrying value of the reporting unit is compared to an estimate
of its fair value. If the estimated fair value of the reporting
unit is less than the carrying value, goodwill is impaired and
is written down to its estimated fair value. Goodwill is
assigned to and the fair value is tested at the reporting unit
level. We evaluated goodwill and intangible assets using six
reporting units where goodwill is recordedspecifically,
North America; Europe and Asia Pacific within the International
segment; and Coalesse, Designtex and PolyVision within the Other
category.
Annually in Q4, or earlier if conditions indicate it is
necessary, we perform an impairment analysis of our intangible
assets not subject to amortization using an income approach
based on the cash flows attributable to the related products. We
also perform an impairment analysis of our intangible assets
subject to amortization during interim periods upon the
occurrence of certain events or changes in circumstance. An
impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of a
long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. In testing for
impairment, we first determine if the asset is recoverable and
then compare the discounted cash flows over the assets
remaining life to the carrying value.
32
As of February 25, 2011, we had $174.8 of goodwill and
$21.7 of net intangible assets recorded on our Consolidated
Balance Sheets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible
|
|
Reportable Segment
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
Assets, Net
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$
|
57.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.6
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Other category
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
174.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During Q4 2011, we performed our annual impairment assessment of
goodwill in our reporting units. In the first step to test for
potential impairment, we measured the estimated fair value of
our reporting units using a discounted cash flow valuation
(DCF) method and reconciled the fair value of our
reporting units to the sum of our total market capitalization
plus a control premium (our adjusted market
capitalization). The control premium represents an
estimate associated with obtaining control of the company in an
acquisition of the outstanding shares of Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock. The DCF analysis used the
present value of projected cash flows and a residual value.
Considerable management judgment is necessary to evaluate the
impact of operating changes and to estimate future cash flows in
measuring fair value. Assumptions used in our impairment
valuations, such as forecasted growth rates and cost of capital,
are consistent with our current internal projections.
As part of the reconciliation to our adjusted market
capitalization, we made adjustments to the estimated future cash
flows, as well as the discount rates used in calculating the
estimated fair value of the reporting units. The discount rates
ranged from 10.5% to 13.0%. Due to the subjective nature of this
reconciliation process, these assumptions could change over
time, which may result in future impairment charges.
As of the valuation date, the enterprise value available for
goodwill determined by each method described above is in excess
of the underlying reported value of goodwill as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value
|
|
|
|
|
Available in Excess
|
|
Reportable Segment
|
|
|
of Goodwill
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$
|
377.0
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
355.0
|
|
Other category
|
|
|
|
121.0
|
|
For each reporting unit, the excess enterprise value available
for goodwill is primarily driven by the residual value of future
years. Thus, increasing the discount rate by 1%, leaving all
other assumptions unchanged, would reduce the enterprise value
in excess of goodwill to the following amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value
|
|
|
|
|
Available in Excess
|
|
Reportable Segment
|
|
|
of Goodwill
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$
|
263.0
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
277.0
|
|
Other category
|
|
|
|
98.0
|
|
Based on the sensitivity analysis above, no reporting units
would have had goodwill balances in excess of enterprise value
available for goodwill.
See Note 2 and Note 10 to the consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
Income
Taxes
Our annual effective tax rate is based on income, statutory tax
rates and tax planning strategies available in various
jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax laws are complex and
subject to different
33
interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental
taxing authorities. Significant judgment is required in
determining our tax expense and in evaluating tax positions. Tax
positions are reviewed quarterly and balances are adjusted as
new information becomes available.
We are audited by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service under
the Compliance Assurance Process (CAP). Under CAP,
the U.S. Internal Revenue Service works with large business
taxpayers to identify and resolve issues prior to the filing of
a tax return. Accordingly, we expect to record minimal
liabilities for U.S. Federal uncertain tax positions. Tax
positions are reviewed regularly for state, local and
non-U.S. tax
liabilities associated with uncertain tax positions. Our
liability for uncertain tax positions in these jurisdictions is
$0.1.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the estimated future tax consequences attributable to temporary
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
These assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax
rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which
the temporary differences are expected to reverse. In evaluating
our ability to recover deferred tax assets within the
jurisdiction from which they arise, we consider all positive and
negative evidence. These assumptions require significant
judgment and are developed using forecasts of future taxable
income that are consistent with the internal plans and estimates
we are using to manage the underlying business.
Future tax benefits of tax loss and credit carryforwards are
recognized to the extent that realization of these benefits is
considered more likely than not. As of February 25, 2011,
we estimate a potential tax benefit from the operating loss
carryforwards before valuation allowances of $96.1, but we have
recorded a valuation allowance of $32.6, which reduced our
realized tax benefit to $63.5. Additionally, we have recognized
tax benefits from tax credit carryforwards of $35.1. It is
considered more likely than not that a combined benefit of $98.6
will be realized on these carryforwards in future periods. This
determination is based on the expectation that related
operations will be sufficiently profitable or various tax,
business and other planning strategies will enable us to utilize
the carryforwards. To the extent that available evidence raises
doubt about the realization of a deferred tax asset, a valuation
allowance is established.
As of February 25, 2011, we have recorded a partial
valuation allowance of $27.8 on certain net operating loss
carryforwards of $76.6. These carryforward benefits relate to
jurisdictions that allow indefinite carryforward periods and in
which we have reported cumulative operating losses in the most
recent three years. Our judgment regarding the utilization of
these net operating losses is based on our conclusion that we
have sufficient evidence that it is more likely than not that we
will generate future taxable income in these jurisdictions. The
key factors that we considered in our analysis included the
impact of restructuring activities and tax planning strategies,
as well as the impact of the cyclical nature of our business on
future sales levels. Our judgment related to the realization of
the deferred tax assets is based on current and expected market
conditions and could change in the event market conditions and
our profitability in these jurisdictions differ significantly
from our current estimates.
A 10% decrease in the expected amount of benefit to be realized
on the carryforwards would have resulted in a decrease in net
income for 2011 of approximately $10.
Changes in tax laws and rates could also affect recorded
deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future. In March
2010, the U.S. enacted significant healthcare reform
legislation for tax years beginning after December 31,
2012. This legislation effectively changes the tax treatment of
the federal subsidies received by employers who provide certain
prescription drug benefits for retirees (the Medicare
Part D subsidy). We are required to recognize the
impact of the tax law change in the period in which the law is
enacted. In Q1 2011, we recognized a reduction in deferred tax
assets related to the Medicare Part D subsidy with an
offsetting increase in income tax expense of $11.4. We are not
aware of any other such tax law or rate changes that would have
a material effect on our results of operations, cash flows or
financial position.
See Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
34
Pension and
Other Post-Retirement Benefits
The Company sponsors a number of domestic and foreign plans to
provide pension, medical and life insurance benefits to retired
employees. As of February 25, 2011 and February 26,
2010, the benefit obligations, fair value of plan assets and
funded status of these plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
|
Post-Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Benefit plan obligations
|
|
|
$
|
87.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
83.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
110.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
131.8
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
$
|
(37.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(38.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(110.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(131.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The post-retirement medical and life insurance plans are
unfunded, but our investments in whole life COLI policies are
intended to be utilized as a long-term funding source for these
benefit obligations. The asset values of the whole life COLI
policies are not segregated in a trust specifically for the
plans, thus are not considered plan assets. Changes in the
values of these policies have no effect on the post-retirement
benefits expense or benefit obligations recorded in the
consolidated financial statements.
As of February 25, 2011, approximately 75% of our unfunded
defined benefit pension obligations related to our non-qualified
supplemental retirement plan that is limited to a select group
of management approved by the Compensation Committee. This plan
is unfunded, but our investments in whole life COLI policies are
intended to be utilized as a long-term funding source for these
benefit obligations. The asset values of the whole life COLI
policies are not segregated in a trust specifically for the
plan, thus are not considered plan assets. Changes in the values
of these policies have no effect on the defined benefit pension
expense or benefit obligations recorded in the consolidated
financial statements.
We recognize the cost of benefits provided during retirement
over the employees active working lives. Inherent in this
approach is the requirement to use various actuarial assumptions
to predict and measure costs and obligations many years prior to
the settlement date. Key actuarial assumptions that require
significant management judgment and have a material impact on
the measurement of our consolidated benefits expense and benefit
obligations include, among others, the discount rate and health
cost trend rates. These assumptions are reviewed with our
actuaries and updated annually based on relevant external and
internal factors and information, including, but not limited to,
benefit payments, expenses paid from the fund, rates of
termination, medical inflation, technology and quality care
changes, regulatory requirements, plan changes and governmental
coverage changes.
To conduct our annual review of discount rates, we perform a
matching exercise of projected plan cash flows against spot
rates on a yield curve comprised of high quality corporate bonds
as of the measurement date (Ryan ALM
45/95
curve) with a primary focus for our domestic plans. The
measurement dates for our retiree benefit plans are consistent
with our fiscal year-end. Accordingly, we select discount rates
to measure our benefit obligations that are consistent with
market indices at the end of each year.
Based on consolidated benefit obligations as of
February 25, 2011, a one percentage point decline in the
weighted-average discount rate used for benefit plan measurement
purposes would have changed the 2011 consolidated benefits
expense by less than $1 and changed the consolidated benefit
obligations by approximately $17. All obligation-related
experience gains and losses are amortized using a straight-line
method over the average remaining service period of active plan
participants.
To conduct our annual review of healthcare cost trend rates, we
model our actual claims cost data over a historical period,
including an analysis of pre-65 versus post-65 age groups and
other important demographic components of our covered retiree
population. This data is adjusted to eliminate the impact of
plan changes and other factors that would tend to distort the
underlying cost inflation trends. Our initial healthcare cost
trend rate is reviewed annually and adjusted as necessary to
remain consistent with recent historical experience and our
expectations regarding short-term future trends. As of
35
February 25, 2011, our initial rates of 8.58% for
pre-age 65 retirees and 6.86% for post-age 65 retirees
were trended downward by each year, until the ultimate trend
rate of 4.5% is reached. The ultimate trend rate is adjusted
annually, as necessary, to approximate the current economic view
on the rate of long-term inflation plus an appropriate
healthcare cost premium.
Based on consolidated benefit obligations as of
February 25, 2011, a one percentage point increase or
decrease in the assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have
changed the 2011 consolidated benefits expense by less than $1
and changed the consolidated benefit obligations by
approximately $2. All experience gains and losses are amortized
using a straight-line method, over at least the minimum
amortization period prescribed by accounting guidance.
Despite the previously described policies for selecting key
actuarial assumptions, we periodically experience material
differences between assumed and actual experience. As of
February 25, 2011, we had consolidated unamortized prior
service credits and net experience gains of $22.9, as compared
to $7.0 as of February 26, 2010, recorded in Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
Forward-Looking
Statements
From time to time, in written and oral statements, we discuss
our expectations regarding future events and our plans and
objectives for future operations. These forward-looking
statements discuss goals, intentions and expectations as to
future trends, plans, events, results of operations or financial
condition, or state other information relating to us, based on
current beliefs of management as well as assumptions made by,
and information currently available to, us. Forward-looking
statements generally are accompanied by words such as
anticipate, believe, could,
estimate, expect, forecast,
intend, may, possible,
potential, predict, project,
or other similar words, phrases or expressions. Although we
believe these forward-looking statements are reasonable, they
are based upon a number of assumptions concerning future
conditions, any or all of which may ultimately prove to be
inaccurate. Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary from
our expectations because of factors such as, but not limited to,
competitive and general economic conditions domestically and
internationally; acts of terrorism, war, governmental action,
natural disasters and other Force Majeure events; changes in the
legal and regulatory environment; our restructuring activities;
changes in raw materials and commodity costs; currency
fluctuations; changes in customer demands; and the other risks
and contingencies detailed in this Report and our other filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no
obligation to update, amend or clarify forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
Recently Issued
Accounting Standards
See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for
information regarding recently issued accounting standards.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk:
|
We are exposed to market risks from foreign currency exchange,
interest rates, commodity prices and fixed income and equity
prices, which could affect our operating results, financial
position and cash flows.
Foreign Currency
Exchange Risk
We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk primarily
on sales commitments, anticipated sales and purchases and assets
and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar. We transact business in 16 primary currencies
worldwide, of which the most significant in 2011 were the
36
euro, the Canadian dollar and the pound sterling. Revenue from
foreign locations represented approximately 38% of our
consolidated revenue in 2011, 36% in 2010 and 37% in 2009. We
actively manage the foreign currency exposures that are
associated with committed foreign currency purchases and sales
created in the normal course of business at the local entity
level. Exposures that cannot be naturally offset within a local
entity to an immaterial amount are often hedged with foreign
currency derivatives or netted with offsetting exposures at
other entities. Our results are affected by the strength of the
currencies in countries where we manufacture or purchase goods
relative to the strength of the currencies in countries where
our products are sold.
We estimate that an additional 10% strengthening of the
U.S. dollar against local currencies would have decreased
operating income by approximately $2 in 2011, assuming no
changes other than the exchange rate itself. However, this
quantitative measure has inherent limitations. The sensitivity
analysis disregards the possibility that rates can move in
opposite directions and that gains from one currency may or may
not be offset by losses from another currency.
The translation of the assets and liabilities of our
international subsidiaries is made using the foreign currency
exchange rates as of the end of the fiscal year. Translation
adjustments are not included in determining net income but are
disclosed in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
within shareholders equity on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets until a sale or substantially complete liquidation of the
net investment in the international subsidiary takes place. In
certain markets, we could recognize a significant gain or loss
related to unrealized cumulative translation adjustments if we
were to exit the market and liquidate our net investment. As of
February 25, 2011, the cumulative net currency translation
adjustments reduced shareholders equity by $18.6.
Foreign currency exchange gains and losses reflect transaction
gains and losses, which arise from monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in currencies other than a business
units functional currency. For 2011, net transaction
losses were $1.2.
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
Interest Rate
Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily on our short-term
and long-term investments and short-term and long-term
borrowings. Our short-term investments are primarily invested in
U.S. agency debt securities, U.S. government debt
securities and corporate debt securities. Additionally we held
$16.7 investments in auction rate securities and Canadian
$5.0 par asset-backed commercial paper restructuring notes
as of February 25, 2011, which are classified as long-term
investments as no liquid markets currently exist for these
securities. The risk on our short-term and long-term borrowings
is primarily related to a $43.1 loan, which bears a floating
interest rate based on
30-day LIBOR
plus 3.35%.
We estimate a 1% increase in interest rates would not have a
material impact on our results of operations or financial
condition, as we expect the higher interest expense would be
offset by an increase in interest income on our investments.
Significant changes in interest rates could have an impact on
the market value of our managed fixed-income investment
portfolio. However, as of February 25, 2011, approximately
80% of our fixed-income investments mature within one year,
approximately 10% in two years and approximately 10% in three to
five years, which mitigates the impact that interest rate
changes would have on the market value of these investments.
Accordingly, we believe that any change in interest rates would
not have a material impact on our results of operations or
financial condition. This quantitative measure has inherent
limitations since not all of our investments are in similar
asset classes. In addition, our investment manager actively
manages certain investments, thus our results could be better or
worse than market returns.
See Note 6 and Note 12 to the consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
37
Commodity Price
Risk
We are exposed to commodity price risk primarily on our raw
materials inventory. These raw materials are not rare or unique
to our industry. The cost of steel, aluminum, other metals,
wood, particleboard, petroleum-based products and other
commodities, such as fuel and energy, has fluctuated
significantly in recent years due to changes in global supply
and demand. Our gross margins could be affected if these types
of costs continue to fluctuate. We actively manage these raw
material costs through global sourcing initiatives and price
increases on our products. However, in the short-term, rapid
increases in raw material costs can be very difficult to offset
with price increases because of contractual agreements with our
customers, and it is difficult to find effective financial
instruments to hedge against such changes.
As a result of changes in commodity costs, cost of sales
increased approximately $10 during 2011. We estimate that a 1%
increase in commodity prices, assuming no offsetting benefit of
price increases, would have decreased our operating income by
approximately $9 in 2011.
Fixed Income and
Equity Price Risk
We are exposed to fixed income and equity price risk primarily
on the cash surrender value associated with our investments in
variable life COLI policies. During 2010 and 2009, our results
of operations were significantly impacted by net returns in cash
surrender value, normal insurance expenses and any death benefit
gains (COLI income) related to our investments in
variable life COLI policies. We recognized non-taxable income of
$33.1 in 2010 and non-tax deductible losses of $41.1 in 2009
related to variable life COLI income in Operating income
on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In Q1 2011, we
began considering our investments in variable life COLI policies
to be primarily a source of corporate liquidity. Accordingly, we
set the allocation of our investments in variable life COLI
policies to a more conservative profile with a heavier weighting
to fixed income securities, and we began recognizing variable
life COLI income in Investment income on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. See Note 9 to the consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
We estimate a 10% adverse change in the value of the equity
portion of our variable life COLI investments would have reduced
our net income by approximately $2 in 2011. We estimate that the
risk of changes in the value of the variable life COLI
investments due to other factors, including changes in interest
rates, yield curve and portfolio duration, would not have a
material impact on our results of operations or financial
condition. This quantitative measure has inherent limitations
since not all of our investments are in similar asset classes.
In addition, our investment manager actively manages certain
investments, thus our results could be better or worse than
market returns.
See Note 6 and Note 9 to the consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
38
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data:
|
MANAGEMENTS
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting. This system
is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and
expenditures are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and the Board of Directors; and
(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on
the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal
control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable
assurance and may not prevent or detect all misstatements.
Further, because of changes in conditions, effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting may vary over time.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the system of internal
control over financial reporting based on the framework in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on this assessment, management determined that
our system of internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of February 25, 2011.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, the independent registered
certified public accounting firm that audited our financial
statements included in this annual report on
Form 10-K,
also audited the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting, as stated in their report which is included
herein.
39
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
STEELCASE INC.
GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of
Steelcase Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
February 25, 2011, based on criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of February 25, 2011, based on the criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
accompanying consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 as of and
for the year ended February 25, 2011 of the Company and our
report dated April 25, 2011 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those financial statements and financial statement
schedule.
/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Grand Rapids, Michigan
April 25, 2011
40
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
STEELCASE INC.
GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Steelcase Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
shareholders equity, and cash flows for the years then
ended. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule
listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements
and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Steelcase Inc. and subsidiaries at February 25, 2011 and
February 26, 2010 and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
February 25, 2011, based on the criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
and our report dated April 25, 2011 expressed an
unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Grand Rapids, Michigan
April 25, 2011
41
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
STEELCASE INC.
GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows
of Steelcase Inc. for the year ended February 27, 2009. In
connection with our audit of the financial statements, we have
also audited the financial statement schedule for the year ended
February 27, 2009 as listed in Item 15(a). These
financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our
audits.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements and schedule, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements and schedule. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended
February 27, 2009, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule for the
year ended February 27, 2009, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein.
BDO USA, LLP
(formerly known as BDO Seidman, LLP)
Grand Rapids, Michigan
April 23, 2009
42
STEELCASE INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in
millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
2,437.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,291.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,183.7
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
1,693.8
|
|
|
|
|
1,619.9
|
|
|
|
|
2,236.7
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
717.5
|
|
|
|
|
649.8
|
|
|
|
|
923.1
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
661.2
|
|
|
|
|
648.4
|
|
|
|
|
842.9
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.2
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17.0
|
)
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
|
(31.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
|
(17.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
43
STEELCASE INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
350.8
|
|
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $23.1 and $20.6
|
|
|
|
271.0
|
|
|
|
|
242.5
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
127.1
|
|
|
|
|
98.4
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
58.0
|
|
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
|
49.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
1,012.3
|
|
|
|
|
635.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $1,228.1 and $1,309.9
|
|
|
|
345.8
|
|
|
|
|
415.7
|
|
Company-owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
223.1
|
|
|
|
|
209.6
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
132.2
|
|
|
|
|
144.5
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
174.8
|
|
|
|
|
183.8
|
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$58.7 and $56.8
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
45.2
|
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$
|
1,996.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,677.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
$
|
195.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
159.2
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
255.5
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Accrued expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation
|
|
|
|
136.3
|
|
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
Product warranties
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
Employee benefit plan obligations
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
|
|
|
91.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
736.8
|
|
|
|
|
412.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt less current maturities
|
|
|
|
291.3
|
|
|
|
|
293.4
|
|
Employee benefit plan obligations
|
|
|
|
170.0
|
|
|
|
|
189.5
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
|
|
|
84.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
541.3
|
|
|
|
|
567.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
1,278.1
|
|
|
|
|
979.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock-no par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized,
none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock-no par value; 475,000,000 shares
authorized, 88,009,433 and 80,360,130 issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
Class B Common Stock-no par value; 475,000,000 shares
authorized, 44,225,135 and 52,603,081 issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
(17.9
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
649.1
|
|
|
|
|
650.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
718.4
|
|
|
|
|
697.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
$
|
1,996.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,677.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
44
STEELCASE INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(in
millions, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
138,649,778
|
|
|
|
$
|
114.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
773.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
910.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
151.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issuance
|
|
|
|
47,591
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
|
(5,145,354
|
)
|
|
|
|
(59.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect of exercise of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock unit issuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock expense
|
|
|
|
(3,984
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units converted to common stock
|
|
|
|
127,254
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance shares converted to common stock, restricted stock
and restricted stock units
|
|
|
|
126,036
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance share, performance units and restricted stock units
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(39.9
|
)
|
Dividends paid ($0.53 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(71.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
133,801,321
|
|
|
|
$
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
(22.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
690.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
732.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
(51.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issuance
|
|
|
|
44,346
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
|
(1,060,743
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect of exercise of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation related to IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units converted to common stock
|
|
|
|
144,595
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance shares converted to common stock, restricted stock
and restricted stock units
|
|
|
|
33,692
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance share, performance units and restricted stock units
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Dividends paid ($0.20 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
132,963,211
|
|
|
|
$
|
57.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
650.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
697.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issuance
|
|
|
|
41,720
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
|
(1,001,590
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect of exercise of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation related to IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units converted to common stock
|
|
|
|
231,227
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance share, performance units and restricted stock units
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
Dividends paid ($0.16 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
132,234,568
|
|
|
|
$
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
649.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
718.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
38.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
45
STEELCASE INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(11.7
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in)
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
64.4
|
|
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
|
|
|
87.3
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.2
|
|
Changes in cash surrender value of COLI
|
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
(Gain) loss on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Gain from IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
|
(18.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
Pension and post-retirement benefit cost
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
Restructuring charges (payments), net
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
Excess tax expense (benefit) from vesting of stock awards
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of
acquisitions, divestures, and deconsolidations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
(65.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
|
70.2
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
(28.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(50.0
|
)
|
Employee compensation
|
|
|
|
41.7
|
|
|
|
|
(62.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(52.5
|
)
|
Employee benefit obligations
|
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22.7
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
|
(19.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(36.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
(46.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(35.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(83.0
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
|
(335.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25.6
|
)
|
Liquidations of investments
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Proceeds from IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
(254.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(61.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
(21.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(71.3
|
)
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(59.2
|
)
|
Common stock issuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Excess tax (expense) benefit from vesting of stock awards
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Borrowings of long-term debt, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
247.4
|
|
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
Borrowings of lines of credit
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Repayments of lines of credit
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
|
211.1
|
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
(132.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(96.3
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
|
213.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
117.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds received
|
|
|
$
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
$
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade-in value received for existing corporate aircraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final progress payment towards replacement corporate aircraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit towards future replacement corporate aircraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from trade-in of corporate aircraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
46
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Steelcase is the global leader in furnishing the work experience
in office environments. Founded in 1912, we are
headquartered in Grand Rapids, Michigan, U.S.A. and employ
approximately 10,000 employees. We operate manufacturing
and distribution center facilities in 25 principal locations. We
distribute products through various channels, including
independent and company-owned dealers, in more than 800
locations throughout the world, and have led the global office
furniture industry in revenue every year since 1974. We operate
under North America and International reportable segments plus
an Other category. Additional information about our
reportable segments is contained in Note 18.
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
|
|
|
Principles of
Consolidation
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Steelcase Inc. and its subsidiaries. We consolidate entities in
which we maintain a controlling interest. All material
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
We also consolidate variable interest entities
(VIEs) when appropriate. As of February 26,
2010, we consolidated a variable interest dealer because we were
considered the primary beneficiary under applicable accounting
guidance. However, we deconsolidated this dealer in 2011 under
new accounting guidance, which we adopted in Q1 2011. This
deconsolidation had no effect on net income. See Note 3 and
Note 19 for additional information.
Investments in entities where our equity ownership falls between
20% and 50%, or where we otherwise have significant influence,
are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. All
other investments in unconsolidated affiliates are accounted for
under the cost method of accounting. These investments are
reported as Investments in unconsolidated affiliates on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and income from equity method
and cost method investments are reported in Other income
(expense), net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
See Note 11 for additional information.
Our fiscal year ends on the last Friday in February with each
fiscal quarter including 13 weeks. In addition, reference
to a year relates to the fiscal year, ended in February of the
year indicated, rather than the calendar year, unless indicated
by a specific date. Additionally, Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 reference
the first, second, third and fourth quarter, respectively, of
the fiscal year indicated. All amounts are in millions, except
share and per share data, data presented as a percentage or as
otherwise indicated.
Certain amounts in the prior years financial statements
have been reclassified and corrected to conform to the current
year presentation. The long-term portions of the accrued
liabilities for product warranties and self-insured losses
related to workers compensation of $7.1 and $14.0,
respectively, as of February 26, 2010, previously
classified as current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets, have been reclassified to long-term liabilities. The
non-current portions of deferred income taxes related to these
liabilities of $8.1 have also been reclassified from current to
non-current deferred income taxes on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. We did not amend our 2010
Form 10-K
or any other prior period filing, as the corrections of these
amounts were not considered material to the Consolidated Balance
Sheets and they had no impact on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for any of
the periods presented.
47
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. Although these
estimates are based on historical data and managements
knowledge of current events and actions we may undertake in the
future, actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
For most international operations, local currencies are
considered the functional currencies. We translate assets and
liabilities of these subsidiaries to their U.S. dollar
equivalents at exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet
date. Translation adjustments are not included in determining
net income, but are recorded in Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets until a sale or substantially complete liquidation of the
net investment in the international subsidiary takes place. We
translate Consolidated Statements of Operations accounts at
average exchange rates for the period.
Foreign currency transaction gains and losses, net of
derivatives, arising primarily from changes in exchange rates on
foreign currency denominated intercompany working capital loans
and other intercompany transactions and balances between foreign
locations, are recorded in Other income (expense), net.
|
|
|
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
Cash and cash equivalents include demand bank deposits and
highly liquid investment securities with an original maturity of
three months or less. Cash equivalents are reported at cost and
approximate fair value. Outstanding checks in excess of funds on
deposit are classified as Accounts payable on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
Allowances for
Credit Losses
|
Allowances for credit losses related to accounts receivable and
notes receivable are maintained at a level considered by
management to be adequate to absorb an estimate of probable
future losses existing at the balance sheet date. In estimating
probable losses, we review accounts that are past due or in
bankruptcy. We consider an accounts receivable or notes
receivable balance past due when payment is not received within
the stated terms. We review accounts that may have higher credit
risk using information available about the customer or dealer,
such as financial statements, news reports and published credit
ratings. We also use general information regarding industry
trends, the economic environment and information gathered
through our network of field-based employees. Using an estimate
of current fair market value of any applicable collateral and
other credit enhancements, such as third party guarantees, we
arrive at an estimated loss for specific concerns and estimate
an additional amount for the remainder of trade balances based
on historical trends and other factors previously referenced.
Receivable balances are written off when we determine the
balance is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are
credited to bad debt expense when received.
|
|
|
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
|
Our trade receivables are primarily due from independent dealers
who, in turn, carry receivables from their customers. We monitor
and manage the credit risk associated with individual dealers
and direct customers where applicable. Dealers are responsible
for assessing and assuming credit risk of
48
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
their customers and may require their customers to provide
deposits, letters of credit or other credit enhancement
measures. Some sales contracts are structured such that the
customer payment or obligation is direct to us. In those cases,
we may assume the credit risk. Whether from dealers or
customers, our trade credit exposures are not concentrated with
any particular entity.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The North
America segment primarily uses the last in, first out
(LIFO) method to value its inventories. The
International segment values inventories primarily using the
first in, first out method. Businesses within the Other category
primarily use the first in, first out or the average cost
inventory valuation methods. See Note 7 for additional
information.
|
|
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment, including some
internally-developed internal use software, are stated at cost.
Major improvements that materially extend the useful lives of
the assets are capitalized. Expenditures for repairs and
maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is
provided using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets.
Long-lived assets such as property, plant and equipment are
tested for impairment when conditions indicate that the carrying
value may not be recoverable. We evaluate several conditions,
including, but not limited to, the following: a significant
decrease in the market price of an asset or an asset group; a
significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a
long-lived asset is being used, including an extended period of
idleness; and a current expectation that, more likely than not,
a long-lived asset or asset group will be sold or otherwise
disposed of significantly before the end of its previously
estimated useful life. We review the carrying value of our
long-lived assets held and used using estimates of future
undiscounted cash flows. If the carrying value of a long-lived
asset is considered impaired, an impairment charge is recorded
for the amount by which the carrying value of the long-lived
asset exceeds its fair value.
When assets are classified as held for sale, losses
are recorded for the difference between the carrying amount of
the property, plant and equipment and the estimated fair value
less estimated selling costs. Property, plant and equipment are
considered held for sale when it is expected that
the asset is going to be sold within twelve months. See
Note 8 for additional information.
Rent expense under operating leases is recorded on a
straight-line basis over the lease term unless the lease
contains an escalation clause which is not fixed and
determinable. The lease term begins when we have the right to
control the use of the leased property, which is typically
before rent payments are due under the terms of the lease. If a
lease has a fixed and determinable escalation clause, the
difference between rent expense and rent paid is recorded as
deferred rent. Rent expense under operating leases that do not
have an escalation clause or where escalation is based on an
inflation index is expensed over the lease term as it is
payable. See Note 17 for additional information.
|
|
|
Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price
and the related underlying tangible and identifiable intangible
net asset values resulting from business acquisitions. Annually
in Q4, or earlier if conditions indicate it is necessary, the
carrying value of the reporting unit is compared to an estimate
of its fair value. If the estimated fair value of the reporting
unit is less than the carrying value, goodwill is impaired and
is written down to its estimated fair value. Goodwill is
assigned to and the fair value is
49
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
tested at the reporting unit level. We evaluate goodwill and
intangible assets using six reporting units where goodwill is
recordedspecifically North America; Europe and Asia
Pacific within the International segment; and Coalesse,
Designtex and PolyVision within the Other category. See
Note 10 for additional information.
Other intangible assets subject to amortization consist
primarily of proprietary technology, trademarks and non-compete
agreements and are amortized over their estimated useful
economic lives using the straight-line method. Other intangible
assets not subject to amortization, consisting of certain
trademarks, are accounted for and evaluated for potential
impairment in a manner consistent with goodwill. See
Note 10 for additional information.
Loss contingencies are accrued if the loss is probable and the
amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal costs
associated with potential loss contingencies are expensed as
incurred. We are involved in litigation from time to time in the
ordinary course of our business. Based on known information, we
do not believe we are party to any lawsuit or proceeding that is
likely to have a material adverse impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
We are self-insured for certain losses relating to domestic
workers compensation, product liability, and employee
medical, dental, and short-term disability claims. We purchase
insurance coverage to reduce our exposure to significant levels
of these claims. Self-insured losses are accrued based upon
estimates of the aggregate liability for uninsured claims
incurred as of the balance sheet date using current and
historical claims experience and certain actuarial assumptions.
These estimates are subject to uncertainty due to a variety of
factors, including extended lag times in the reporting and
resolution of claims, and trends or changes in claim settlement
patterns, insurance industry practices and legal
interpretations. As a result, actual costs could differ
significantly from the estimated amounts. Adjustments to
estimated reserves are recorded in the period in which the
change in estimate occurs.
Our total reserve for estimated domestic workers
compensation claim costs incurred as of February 25, 2011
and February 26, 2010 was $16.8 and $20.0, respectively.
Our reserve for estimated domestic workers compensation
claims expected to be paid within one year as of
February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010 was $5.2 and
$6.0, respectively, and is included in Accrued expenses:
Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, while our reserve
for estimated domestic workers compensation claims
expected to be paid beyond one year is included in Other
long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During Q2 2011, we recognized a change in estimate, decreasing
the reserve for estimated domestic workers compensation
claim costs by $3.7. The change in estimate was mainly due to
the continuation of favorable trends in past experience.
Our reserve for estimated product liability claim costs incurred
as of February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010 was $5.3
and $7.1, respectively, and is included in Accrued expenses:
Other on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. During Q2 2011, we
recognized a change in estimate, decreasing the reserve for
estimated product liability claim costs by $3.0. The change in
estimate was due to the continuation of favorable trends in past
experience.
The estimate for employee medical, dental, and short-term
disability claims incurred as of February 25, 2011 and
February 26, 2010 was $4.1 and $2.8, respectively, and is
recorded within Accrued expenses: Other on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
50
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
We offer warranties ranging from 8 years to lifetime for
most products, subject to certain exceptions. These warranties
provide for the free repair or replacement of any covered
product, part or component that fails during normal use because
of a defect in materials or workmanship. The accrued liability
for product warranties is based on an estimated amount needed to
cover product warranty costs, including product recall and
retrofit costs incurred as of the balance sheet date determined
by historical claims experience and our knowledge of current
events and actions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Roll-Forward of Accrued
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Liability for Product Warranties
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Balance as of beginning of period
|
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.6
|
|
Accruals related to product warranties, recalls and retrofits
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
Adjustments related to changes in estimates
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions for settlements
|
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of end of period
|
|
|
$
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Q2 2011, we increased the estimate of our general reserve for
warranty claims by $6.0. The increase in our general warranty
reserve was linked to implementation of new software supporting
our claims management processes, which allowed us to more deeply
understand our historical experience as a foundation for
estimating future claims. In addition, during Q2 2011, we
recorded a specific product warranty charge of $4.7 for
estimated expenses related to a retrofit project. Our reserve
for estimated settlements expected to be paid beyond one year as
of February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010 was $14.0
and $7.1, respectively, and is included in Other long-term
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
Pension and
Other Post-Retirement Benefits
|
We sponsor a number of domestic and foreign plans to provide
pension benefits and medical and life insurance benefits to
retired employees. We measure the net over-funded or
under-funded positions of our defined benefit pension plans and
post-retirement benefit plans as of the fiscal year end and
display that position as an asset or liability on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any unrecognized prior service
cost, experience gains/losses or transition obligation is
reported as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss), net of tax, in shareholders equity. See
Note 5 and Note 13 for additional information.
Environmental expenditures related to current operations are
expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures related to
an existing condition allegedly caused by past operations, and
not associated with current or future revenue generation, are
expensed. Generally, the timing of these accruals coincides with
completion of a feasibility study or our commitment to a formal
plan of action. Liabilities are recorded on an undiscounted
basis unless site-specific plans indicate the amount and timing
of cash payments are fixed or reliably determinable. We have
ongoing monitoring and identification processes to assess how
the activities, with respect to the known exposures, are
progressing against the accrued cost estimates, as well as to
identify other potential remediation sites that are presently
unknown. The liability for environmental contingencies included
in Accrued expenses: Other on the Consolidated
51
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Balance Sheets was $2.2 as of February 27, 2011 and $3.6 as
of February 26, 2010. Our undiscounted liabilities were
$3.4 as of February 25, 2011 and $5.0 as of
February 26, 2010. Based on our ongoing evaluation of these
matters, we believe we have accrued sufficient reserves to
absorb the costs of all known environmental assessments and the
remediation costs of all known sites.
|
|
|
Asset
Retirement Obligations
|
We record all known asset retirement obligations for which the
liabilitys fair value can be reasonably estimated. We also
have known conditional asset retirement obligations that are not
reasonably estimable due to insufficient information about the
timing and method of settlement of the obligation. Accordingly,
these obligations have not been recorded in the consolidated
financial statements. A liability for these obligations will be
recorded in the period when sufficient information regarding
timing and method of settlement becomes available to make a
reasonable estimate of the liabilitys fair value. In
addition, there may be conditional asset retirement obligations
we have not yet discovered, and therefore, these obligations
also have not been included in the consolidated financial
statements.
Revenue consists substantially of product sales and related
service revenue. Product sales are reported net of discounts and
estimated returns and allowances and are recognized when title
and risks associated with ownership have passed to the dealer or
customer. Typically, this is when product is shipped to the
dealer. When product is shipped directly to an end customer,
revenue is typically recognized upon delivery or upon acceptance
by the end customer. Revenue from services is recognized when
the services have been rendered. Total revenue does not include
sales tax, as we consider ourselves a pass-through entity for
collecting and remitting sales taxes.
Cost of sales includes material, labor and overhead. Included
within these categories are such items as compensation expense,
depreciation, facilities expense, inbound freight charges,
warehousing costs, shipping and handling expenses, internal
transfer costs and other costs of our distribution network.
Operating expenses include selling, general and administrative
expenses not directly related to the manufacturing of our
products. Included in these expenses are items such as
compensation expense, depreciation, facilities expense, rental
expense, royalty expense, information technology services, legal
services and travel and entertainment expense.
|
|
|
Research and
Development Expenses
|
Research and development expenses, which are expensed as
incurred, were $32.0 for 2011, $33.0 for 2010 and $50.0 for
2009. We invest approximately one to two percent of our revenue
in research, design and development each year. Royalties are
sometimes paid to external designers of our products as the
products are sold. These costs are not included in the research
and development expenses.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the estimated future tax consequences attributable to temporary
differences between the consolidated financial statements
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. These deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which
52
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effect of
a change in tax rates on deferred income tax assets and
liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date.
We have net operating loss carryforwards available in certain
jurisdictions to reduce future taxable income. Future tax
benefits associated with net operating loss carryforwards are
recognized to the extent that realization of these benefits is
considered more likely than not. This determination is based on
the expectation that related operations will be sufficiently
profitable or various tax, business and other planning
strategies will enable us to utilize the net operating loss
carryforwards. In making this determination we consider all
available positive and negative evidence. To the extent that
available evidence raises doubt about the realization of a
deferred income tax asset, a valuation allowance is established.
We recognize the tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only
if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be
sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the
technical merits of the position. The tax benefits from
uncertain tax positions recognized are reflected at the amounts
most likely to be sustained on examination. See Note 15 for
additional information.
Our stock-based compensation consists of restricted stock,
restricted stock units, performance shares and performance
units. Our policy is to expense stock-based compensation using
the fair-value based method of accounting for all awards
granted, modified or settled.
Restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and
performance units are credited to equity as they are expensed
over the requisite service periods based on the grant-date fair
value of the shares expected to be issued. See Note 16 for
additional information.
The carrying amounts of our financial instruments, consisting of
cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable,
accounts and notes payable and certain other liabilities,
approximate their fair value due to their relatively short
maturities. Our short-term investments, foreign exchange forward
contracts and long-term investments are measured at fair value
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our total debt is carried at
cost and was $546.8 and $300.8 as of February 25, 2011 and
February 26, 2010, respectively. The fair value of our
total debt is measured using a discounted cash flow analysis
based on current market interest rates for similar types of
instruments and was approximately $555 and $309 as of
February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010, respectively.
See Note 6 and Note 12 for additional information.
We periodically use derivative financial instruments to manage
exposures to movements in interest rates and foreign exchange
rates. The use of these financial instruments modifies the
exposure of these risks with the intention to reduce our risk of
short-term volatility. We do not use derivatives for speculative
or trading purposes.
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange Forward Contracts
|
A portion of our revenue and earnings is exposed to changes in
foreign exchange rates. We seek to manage our foreign exchange
risk largely through operational means, including matching same
currency revenue with same currency costs and same currency
assets with same currency liabilities. Foreign exchange risk is
also managed through the use of derivative instruments. Foreign
exchange forward contracts serve to mitigate the risk of
translation of certain foreign denominated net income, assets
and liabilities. We primarily use derivatives for intercompany
working capital loans and certain forecasted transactions. The
foreign exchange forward contracts relate principally to the
euro, pound sterling,
53
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Canadian dollar and Mexican peso and have maturity dates less
than one year. See Note 6 for additional information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net fair value of derivative instruments (1)
|
|
|
$
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The notional amounts of the outstanding foreign exchange forward
contracts were $147.4 as of February 25, 2011 and $160.6 as
of February 26, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Consolidated Statements of
Operations
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net gains (losses)
|
|
|
$
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
NEW ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS
|
In Q4 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued updated guidance to add new
requirements regarding fair value disclosures about transfers
into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures
about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements relating to
Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value
disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs
and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. We adopted
the new guidance in Q1 2011. See Note 6 for additional
information.
|
|
|
Variable
Interest Entities
|
In Q2 2010, the FASB issued a new accounting statement which
changed the consolidation guidance for VIEs. This statement
requires companies to qualitatively assess the determination of
the primary beneficiary of a VIE based on whether the
beneficiary (1) has the power to direct matters that most
significantly impact the activities of the VIE and (2) has
the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits
of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. We
adopted the new guidance in Q1 2011. Based on this statement, we
deconsolidated a variable interest dealer in Q1 2011 which had
no effect on net income. See Note 19 for additional
information on the impact to our consolidated financial
statements.
In Q2 2011, the FASB issued new guidance expanding disclosures
about the credit quality of financing receivables and the
allowance for credit losses. Financing receivables include loans
and notes receivable, long-term trade accounts receivable and
certain other contractual rights to receive money on demand or
on fixed or determinable dates. Trade accounts receivable with
contractual maturities of
54
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
one year or less that arose from the sales of goods or
services are excluded from the new guidance. The new guidance
requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature of credit
risk inherent in an entitys portfolio of financing
receivables, how that risk is analyzed and the changes and
reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. We
adopted the new guidance in Q4 2011, and it did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Earnings per share is computed using the two-class method. The
two-class method determines earnings per share for each class of
common stock and participating securities according to dividends
or dividend equivalents and their respective participation
rights in undistributed earnings. Participating securities
include performance units and restricted stock units in which
the participants have non-forfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents during the performance period. Basic
earnings per share of participating securities is the same as
basic earnings per share of common shares for all periods
presented. Diluted earnings per share includes the effects of
options and certain performance shares and performance units in
which the participants have forfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents during the performance period. However,
diluted earnings per share does not reflect the effects of
options, performance shares and certain performance units of
3.3 million for 2011, 3.7 million for 2010 and
4.2 million for 2009 because their effect would have been
anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding for basic net earnings per
share (in millions)
|
|
|
|
132.9
|
|
|
|
|
132.9
|
|
|
|
|
134.4
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock-based compensation (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding for diluted net
earnings per share (in millions)
|
|
|
|
132.9
|
|
|
|
|
132.9
|
|
|
|
|
134.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Comprehensive income is comprised of net income and all changes
to shareholders equity except those due to investments by,
and distributions to, shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
|
Tax (Expense)
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
Tax Amount
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11.7
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
$
|
(40.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40.9
|
)
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Derivative adjustments
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(37.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(39.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(51.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13.6
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
(29.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on investments, net
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.4
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
Derivative adjustments
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on investments, net
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Q3 2011, we amended our post-retirement benefit plan, which
resulted in a pre-tax prior service credit in the minimum
pension liability of $24.4. See Note 13 for additional
information.
Foreign currency translation adjustments reflect the impact of
the changes in certain foreign currency values (principally the
euro, pound sterling and Canadian dollar) relative to the
U.S. dollar. As of February 25, 2011, approximately
26% of our assets were denominated in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar, the majority of which were denominated in
euros.
56
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
$
|
(18.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(24.2
|
)
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
Derivative adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Unrealized loss on investments, net
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit and post-retirement pension plans as a component
of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are
presented in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
|
Tax (Expense)
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
Minimum Pension Liability
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
Tax Amount
|
|
Balance as of February 27, 2009
|
|
|
$
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service (cost) credit from plan amendment arising during
period
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) included in net
periodic pension cost
|
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net prior service (cost) credit during period
|
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
Net actuarial gain (loss) arising during period
|
|
|
|
(25.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
|
(11.0
|
)
|
Amortization of net actuarial (gain) loss included in net
periodic pension cost
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial gain (loss) during period
|
|
|
|
(24.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
|
(10.6
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period change
|
|
|
|
(29.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of February 26, 2010
|
|
|
$
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service (cost) credit from plan amendment arising during
period
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) included in net
periodic pension cost
|
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net prior service (cost) credit during period
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Net actuarial gain (loss) arising during period
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial (gain) loss included in net
periodic pension cost
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial gain (loss) during period
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period change
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of February 25, 2011
|
|
|
$
|
22.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurements are classified under the following
hierarchy:
Level 1Inputs based on quoted market prices
for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the
measurement date.
57
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Level 2Inputs based on quoted prices for
similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for
identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active;
and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs or
significant value-drivers are observable in active markets.
Level 3Inputs reflect managements best
estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability at the measurement date and model-driven
valuations. The inputs are unobservable in the market and
significant to the instruments valuation.
Fair value measurements are classified according to the lowest
level input or value-driver that is significant to the
valuation. A measurement may therefore be classified within
Level 3 even though there may be other significant inputs
that are readily observable.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 25, 2011 are
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
U.S. agency debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254.9
|
|
U.S. government debt securities
|
|
|
|
58.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.9
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
Municipal debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Other long-term investments
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
Canadian asset-backed commercial paper restructuring notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
203.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
292.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
513.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.1
|
|
U.S. agency debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.5
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
U.S. government debt securities
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Foreign debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
Canadian asset-backed commercial paper restructuring notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Other long-term investments
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
120.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
59.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
203.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
During 2011, we determined that certain securities previously
presented in the Level 1 category should have been
presented in the Level 2 category based on the observable
inputs used to value the securities. We have reclassified and
corrected U.S. agency debt securities, corporate debt
securities and foreign debt securities from Level 1 to
Level 2 in the 2010 table above. The reclassification had
no impact on investment values reported in 2010 and had no
effect on the 2010 consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Managed
Investment Portfolio and Other Investments
|
Our managed investment portfolio consists of U.S. agency
debt securities, U.S. government debt securities, corporate
debt securities and municipal debt securities, and our
investment manager operates under a mandate to keep the average
duration of investments under two years. Our managed investment
portfolio and other investments are considered
available-for-sale.
Fair values for these investments are based upon valuations for
identical or similar instruments in active markets, with the
resulting net unrealized holding gains or losses reflected net
of tax as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The cost basis for these investments was $353.2 and $68.3 as of
February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010, respectively,
and the gross unrealized gains and losses were not material for
each year. As of February 25, 2011, approximately 80% of
the debt securities mature within one year, approximately 10% in
two years and approximately 10% in three to five years.
As of February 25, 2011, we held auction rate securities
(ARS) totaling $16.7 of par value. Historically,
liquidity for these securities was provided through a Dutch
auction process that reset the applicable interest rate at
pre-determined intervals every 7 to 28 days. The auctions
failed in 2008 and are not being conducted at this time. We
receive higher penalty interest rates on the securities ranging
from 30-day
LIBOR plus 2.0 to 2.5%. We will not be able to liquidate the
related principal amounts until a buyer is found outside of the
auction process, the issuer calls the security or the security
matures according to contractual terms. We have the intent and
ability to hold these securities until recovery of market value
or maturity, and we believe the current inability to liquidate
these investments will have no impact on our ability to fund our
ongoing operations.
During Q4 2011, three of the issuances held in our portfolio
were redeemed at par aggregating $9.8 in proceeds. While there
has been no payment default with respect to our remaining ARS,
these investments are not widely traded and therefore do not
currently have a readily-determinable market value. To estimate
fair value, we used an internally-developed discounted cash flow
analysis. Our discounted cash flow analysis considers, among
other factors, (i) the credit ratings of the ARS,
(ii) the credit quality of the underlying securities or the
credit rating of issuers, (iii) the estimated timing and
amount of cash flows and (iv) the formula applicable to
each security which defines the penalty interest rate paid as a
result of the failed auctions. Our discounted cash flow analysis
estimates future cash flows from our ARS over their anticipated
workout period at discount rates equal to the sum of
(a) the yield on U.S. Treasury securities with a term
through the estimated workout date plus (b) a risk premium
based on similarly rated observable securities. These
assumptions are based on our current judgment and our view of
current market conditions. Based upon these factors, ARS with an
original par value of approximately $16.7 have been adjusted to
an estimated fair value of $13.8 as of February 25, 2011.
We periodically review our investment portfolio to determine if
any investment is
other-than-temporarily
impaired due to changes in credit risk or other potential
valuation concerns. Through 2011, we recorded
other-than-temporary
impairment losses and unrealized impairment losses of $2.2 and
$0.7, respectively, on our ARS. Factors considered in
determining whether a loss is
other-than-temporary
59
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
include the length of time and extent to which estimated fair
value has been less than the cost basis, the financial condition
and near-term prospects of the issuer and our intent and ability
to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow
for any anticipated recovery in market value. The investments
other-than-temporarily
impaired as of 2011 were impaired due to general credit
declines. Temporary impairments are recorded as unrealized
losses in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The unrealized losses
are due to changes in interest rates and are expected to be
recovered over the contractual term of the instruments. The use
of different assumptions could result in a different valuation
and additional impairments. For example, an increase in the
recovery period by one year would reduce the estimated fair
value of our investment in ARS by approximately $0.1. An
increase to the discount rate of 100 basis points would
reduce the estimated fair value of our investment in ARS by
approximately $1.0.
We continue to monitor the market for ARS and consider the
impact, if any, on the estimated fair value of these
investments. If current market conditions deteriorate further,
or the anticipated recovery in market values does not occur, we
may be required to record additional
other-than-temporary
impairments
and/or
unrealized impairment losses.
|
|
|
Canadian
Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Restructuring Notes
|
As of February 25, 2011, we held four floating-rate
Canadian asset-backed commercial paper restructuring notes with
a combined par value of Canadian $5.0. These notes replaced an
investment in Canadian asset-backed commercial paper, which, as
a result of a lack of liquidity in the market, failed to settle
on maturity and went into default. We recorded an
other-than-temporary
impairment of our investment in 2008 of $0.9.
The restructuring notes were issued under the court-approved
restructuring entity, Master Asset Vehicle II, in 2009. We hold
a
class A-1
note, a
class A-2
note, a class B note and a class C note. The
class A-1
note is rated A by Dominion Bond Rating Service and
equals 68% of the par value of the notes; the
class A-2
note is rated BBB by Dominion Bond Rating Service
and equals 17% of the par value. The class B and
class C notes carry no rating, are subordinated to the
class A notes and approximate 15% of the par value of the
notes. There is not an active trading market for any of these
notes, and they pay interest quarterly at a rate equal to the
Canadian Bankers Acceptance Rate less 50 basis points. Due
to historically low short-term interest rates, less than $0.1 of
interest was received during 2011.
Data from the administrator of the restructuring committee
indicates the
class A-1
and
class A-2
notes are expected to be retired at par in six to seven years
and the class B and class C notes represent the
estimated loss on the underlying pool of financial assets. We
evaluated our investment for impairment as of February 25,
2011 using a discounted cash flow analysis. Our analysis
concluded that no additional impairment was necessary.
|
|
|
Foreign
Exchange Forward Contracts
|
From time to time, we enter into forward contracts to mitigate
the risk of translation into U.S. dollars of certain
foreign-denominated net income, assets and liabilities. We
primarily hedge intercompany working capital loans and certain
forecasted currency flows from intercompany transactions. The
fair value of foreign exchange forward contracts is based on a
valuation model that discounts cash flows resulting from the
differential between the contract price and the market-based
forward rate.
60
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Below is a roll-forward of assets and liabilities measured at
estimated fair value using Level 3 inputs for the years
ended February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-Backed
|
|
|
|
|
Auction Rate
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Roll-forward of Fair Value Using Level 3 Inputs
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
Paper
|
|
Balance as of February 28, 2009
|
|
|
$
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
Unrealized losses on investments
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairments
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of February 26, 2010
|
|
|
$
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on investments
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of investments
|
|
|
|
(9.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of February 25, 2011
|
|
|
$
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
$
|
55.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
45.8
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
|
79.1
|
|
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148.0
|
|
|
|
|
119.7
|
|
LIFO reserve
|
|
|
|
(20.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(21.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
127.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
98.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The portion of inventories determined by the LIFO method
aggregated $45.5 as of February 25, 2011 and $39.0 as of
February 26, 2010. The effect of LIFO liquidations on net
income was not material in 2011. During 2010, a reduction in
inventory quantities resulted in a liquidation of applicable
LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs in prior years.
This LIFO liquidation resulted in a $4.0 decrease in the LIFO
reserve, along with additional deflation impacts of $1.5 during
the year.
|
|
8.
|
PROPERTY, PLANT
AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Lives
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
44.0
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
|
10 40
|
|
|
|
|
507.6
|
|
|
|
|
560.8
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
|
3 15
|
|
|
|
|
730.7
|
|
|
|
|
800.3
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
|
5 8
|
|
|
|
|
70.5
|
|
|
|
|
80.5
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
|
3 10
|
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
|
83.3
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
|
|
3 10
|
|
|
|
|
139.7
|
|
|
|
|
145.2
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,573.9
|
|
|
|
|
1,725.6
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,228.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,309.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
345.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
415.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
A majority of the net book value of property, plant and
equipment relates to machinery and equipment of $123.6 and
building and improvements of $118.5. Depreciation expense on
property, plant and equipment was $61.2 for 2011, $69.4 for 2010
and $79.1 for 2009. The estimated cost to complete construction
in progress as of February 25, 2011 was $37.4, including
$19.8 related to the replacement of a corporate aircraft. The
deposit, progress payments and capitalized interest related to
the new aircraft total $12.3 and are included in construction in
progress, within Property, plant and equipment, net on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We expect to take delivery of
the new aircraft and sell an existing aircraft in 2012. Interest
costs capitalized in construction in progress amounted to $0.4
for 2011, $0.1 for 2010 and $1.4 for 2009.
Included in Other current assets on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of February 25, 2011 is $17.6 of
machinery and equipment that is classified as assets held
for sale as we expect to sell the property in 2012. During
Q4 2011, we recognized a $4.0 impairment of the carrying value
of these assets based on the estimated fair value less costs to
sell.
|
|
9.
|
COMPANY-OWNED
LIFE INSURANCE
|
Our investments in company-owned life insurance
(COLI) policies are recorded at their net cash
surrender value.
Our investments in whole life COLI policies are intended to be
utilized as a long-term funding source for post-retirement
medical benefits, deferred compensation and supplemental
retirement plan obligations, which as of February 25, 2011
aggregated approximately $168, with a related deferred tax asset
of approximately $63. See Note 13 for additional
information. We believe the investments in whole life COLI
policies represent a stable source for these long-term benefit
obligations. Consequently, we allocate COLI income related to
our investments in whole life COLI policies between Cost of
sales and Operating expenses on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations consistent with the costs associated
with the long-term employee benefit obligations that the
investments in whole life policies are intended to fund. This
designation does not result in our investments in whole life
COLI policies representing a committed funding source for
employee benefit obligations. They are subject to claims from
creditors, and we can designate them to another purpose at any
time.
To more efficiently manage our balance sheet and liquidity
position, in Q1 2011, we began considering our investments in
variable life COLI policies to be primarily a source of
corporate liquidity. As a result of this change, we adjusted the
target asset allocation of the investments in variable life COLI
policies to more heavily weight the portfolio to fixed income
securities; and beginning in Q1 2011, net returns in cash
surrender value, normal insurance expenses and any death benefit
gains (COLI income)
62
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
related to our investments in variable life COLI policies have
been recorded in Investment income on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Surrender Value
|
|
|
|
|
Ability to Choose
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Asset Allocation
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Type
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Net Return
|
|
|
as of February 25, 2011
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Whole life COLI policies
|
|
|
No ability
|
|
|
A rate of return set periodically by the insurance companies
|
|
|
Not Applicable
|
|
|
$
|
112.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
109.3
|
|
Variable life COLI policies
|
|
|
Can allocate across a set of choices provided by the insurance
companies
|
|
|
Fluctuates depending on performance of underlying investments
|
|
|
80% Fixed Income; 20% Equity
|
|
|
|
110.3
|
|
|
|
|
100.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
223.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
209.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following is a summary of the allocation of COLI income for
2009, 2010 and 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whole Life
|
|
|
|
Variable Life
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
COLI Income
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
|
|
Policies
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.5
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
38.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
(23.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(22.7
|
)
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
(17.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
(41.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(36.6
|
)
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
(41.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(36.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
10.
|
GOODWILL &
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
A summary of the changes in goodwill during the years ended
February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010, by reportable
segment, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
|
275.3
|
|
|
|
|
138.0
|
|
|
|
|
473.6
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(229.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(60.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(292.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
|
45.4
|
|
|
|
|
77.1
|
|
|
|
|
181.1
|
|
Transfers (1)
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dispositions and adjustments (2)
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
64.2
|
|
|
|
|
277.9
|
|
|
|
|
134.2
|
|
|
|
|
476.3
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(229.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(60.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(292.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of February 26, 2010
|
|
|
$
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
48.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
73.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
183.8
|
|
Dispositions and adjustments (3)
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.4
|
)
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
|
|
|
279.5
|
|
|
|
|
128.2
|
|
|
|
|
467.3
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(229.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(60.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(292.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
$
|
57.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
67.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
174.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In 2010, the transfer of a portion of Coalesses healthcare
business to the North America segment resulted in a goodwill
reclassification of $3.8 between the Other category and the
North America segment. |
|
(2) |
|
In 2010, we deconsolidated a variable interest dealer in our
North America segment. See Note 19 for additional
information. |
|
(3) |
|
In 2011, we deconsolidated a variable interest dealer in our
North America segment and deconsolidated IDEO in the Other
category as a result of the ownership transition. See
Note 19 for additional information. |
In 2011 and 2010, no goodwill impairment charges were recorded.
During the second half of 2009, there was a substantial decline
in the market price of our Class A Common Stock and thus
our market capitalization. As part of our annual goodwill
impairment test, we prepared a reconciliation of the fair value
of our reporting units to the sum of our total market
capitalization plus a 30% control premium as of
February 27, 2009 (our adjusted market
capitalization). The control premium represented an
estimate associated with obtaining control of the company in an
acquisition of the outstanding shares of Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock. Our discounted cash flow
analysis was based on the present value of projected cash flows
of the reporting units plus a residual value. As part of our
reconciliation to our adjusted market capitalization, we made
adjustments to our estimated future cash flows, as well as the
discount rates used in calculating the estimated fair value of
our reporting units. Through this reconciliation process, we
determined the fair value of PolyVision was less than its
carrying value, resulting in a Q4 2009 goodwill impairment
charge of $52.1 in the Other category. In addition, during our
annual impairment testing, we evaluated our investment in an
unconsolidated dealer, which resulted in a Q4 2009 goodwill
impairment charge of $1.7 in the North America segment.
64
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
As of February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010, our
other intangible assets and related accumulated amortization
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible Assets
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proprietary technology
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67.8
|
|
|
|
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
|
69.2
|
|
|
|
|
56.8
|
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
80.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
81.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
56.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2011 and 2010, no intangible asset impairment charges were
recorded. In 2009, as a result of our reduced market
capitalization and our annual impairment testing, we recorded
intangible asset impairment charges of $10.9 related to
PolyVision, of which $7.1 related to intangible assets subject
to amortization and $3.8 related to intangible assets not
subject to amortization.
For 2011, we recorded amortization expense of $3.2 on intangible
assets subject to amortization compared to $4.8 for 2010 and
$8.2 for 2009. Based on the current amount of intangible assets
subject to amortization, the estimated amortization expense for
each of the following five years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending in February
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
2012
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future events, such as acquisitions, dispositions or
impairments, may cause these amounts to vary.
|
|
11.
|
INVESTMENTS IN
UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
|
We enter into joint ventures and other equity investments from
time to time to expand or maintain our geographic presence,
support our distribution network or invest in complementary
products and services. Equity method investments were $39.2 and
$17.6 as of February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010,
respectively. Cost method investments were $6.0 and $6.7 as of
February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010, respectively.
Our investments in unconsolidated affiliates primarily consist
of IDEO,
65
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
dealer relationships and manufacturing joint ventures. Our
investments in unconsolidated affiliates and related direct
ownership interests are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
Ownership
|
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
IDEO
|
|
|
$
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dealer relationships:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity method investments
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
|
20%-40%
|
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
|
25%-40%
|
|
Cost method investments
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
less than 10%
|
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
less than 10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dealer relationships
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing joint ventures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity method investments
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
25%-49%
|
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
25%-49%
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
various
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
various
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
$
|
45.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates is
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
IDEO
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Dealer relationships
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Manufacturing joint ventures
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IDEO, LLC is an innovation and design firm that uses a
human-centered, design-based approach to generate new offerings
and build new capabilities for its customers. IDEO serves
Steelcase and a variety of other organizations within consumer
products, financial services, healthcare, information
technology, government, transportation and other industries. We
began our collaborative relationship with IDEO in 1996 to
generate innovative solutions and customer experience insights,
and we owned a controlling equity interest in IDEO from January
1996 to December 2010. On December 14, 2010, certain
members of the management of IDEO purchased an additional 60%
equity interest in IDEO pursuant to an agreement entered into
during 2008. We retained a 20% equity interest in IDEO, and we
expect to continue our collaborative relationship after this
ownership transition. As a result, we deconsolidated the
operations of IDEO in Q4 2011 and began to record our share of
IDEOs earnings as equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliates in Other income (expense), net on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 19 for
additional information.
We have invested in dealers from time to time to expand or
maintain our geographic presence and support our distribution
network. Many of these dealer relationships begin with project
financing, asset-based lending and term financing as result of
the dealer facing financial difficulty or facing difficulty in
transitioning to new ownership. We choose to make financial
investments in these dealers to address
66
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
these risks or continue our presence in a region as establishing
new dealers in a market can take considerable time and resources.
|
|
|
Manufacturing
Joint Ventures
|
We have entered into manufacturing joint ventures from time to
time to expand or maintain our geographic presence. The
manufacturing joint ventures primarily consist of Steelcase
Jeraisy Company Limited, which is located in Saudi Arabia and is
engaged in the manufacturing of wood and metal office furniture
systems, accessories and related products for the region.
The summarized financial information presented below represents
the combined accounts of our equity method investments in
unconsolidated affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Statements of Operations
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Dividends received from our investments in unconsolidated
affiliates were $2.4, $3.2 and $2.8 in 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. We had sales to our investments in unconsolidated
affiliates of approximately $183, $140 and $163 in 2011, 2010
and 2009, respectively. Amounts due from our investments in
unconsolidated affiliates were $20.1 and $7.2 as of
February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010, respectively.
67
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
12.
|
SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS AND LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Range
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Debt Obligations
|
|
|
as of February 25, 2011
|
|
|
Maturity Range
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
U.S. dollar obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes (1)
|
|
|
|
6.375%
|
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
$
|
249.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Senior notes (2)
|
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
249.9
|
|
|
|
|
249.8
|
|
Revolving credit facilities (3)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable (4)
|
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.35%
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
43.1
|
|
|
|
|
45.4
|
|
Capitalized lease obligations
|
|
|
|
6.0%-6.5%
|
|
|
|
|
2012-2015
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
543.4
|
|
|
|
|
296.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facilities (5)
|
|
|
|
6.0%
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Note Payable
|
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term borrowings and long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546.8
|
|
|
|
|
300.8
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt (6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255.5
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
291.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
293.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2011, we issued $250 of unsecured unsubordinated senior
notes, due in February 2021 (2021 Notes). The 2021
Notes were priced at 99.953% of par value. The bond discount of
$0.1 and direct debt issue costs of $3.0 were deferred and are
being amortized over the life of the 2021 Notes. Although the
coupon rate of the 2021 Notes is 6.375%, the effective interest
rate is 6.6% after taking into account the impact of the
discount, debt issuance costs and the deferred loss on interest
rate locks related to the debt issuance. The 2021 Notes rank
equally with all of our other unsecured unsubordinated
indebtedness, and they contain no financial covenants. We expect
to use the net proceeds from the 2021 Notes, together with
available cash on hand, to repay the outstanding $250 aggregate
principal amount of our 6.5% senior notes due
August 15, 2011. We may redeem some or all of the 2021
Notes at any time. The redemption price would equal the greater
of (1) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed; or
(2) the present value of the remaining scheduled payments
of principal and interest discounted to the redemption date on a
semi-annual basis at the comparable U.S. Treasury rate plus
45 basis points; plus, in both cases, accrued and unpaid
interest. If the notes are redeemed within 3 months of
maturity, the redemption price would be equal to the principal
amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid
interest. During 2011, amortization expense related to the
discount and debt issuance costs on the 2021 Notes was
immaterial. |
|
(2) |
|
During 2007, we issued $250 of unsecured unsubordinated senior
notes, due in August 2011 (2012 Notes). The 2012
Notes were priced at 99.715% of par value. The bond discount of
$0.7 and direct debt issue costs of $1.9 were deferred and are
being amortized over the life of the 2012 Notes. Although the
coupon rate of the 2012 Notes is 6.5%, the effective interest
rate is 6.3% after taking into account the impact of the
discount and debt issuance costs, offset by the deferred gain on
interest rate locks related to the debt issuance. The 2012 Notes
rank equally with all of our other unsecured unsubordinated
indebtedness, and they contain no financial covenants. We may
redeem some or all of the 2012 Notes at any time. The redemption
price would equal the greater of (1) the full principal
amount of the notes being redeemed, or (2) the present
value of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and
interest discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual
basis at the comparable U.S. Treasury rate plus 25 basis
points; plus, in both cases, accrued and unpaid interest. |
68
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
During 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recorded amortization expense of
$0.5 in each year related to the discount and debt issuance
costs on the 2012 Notes. |
|
(3) |
|
We have a $125 global committed bank facility which was entered
into in Q4 2010. As of February 25, 2011, there were no
borrowings outstanding under the facility, and our availability
was not limited. As of February 26, 2010, there were no
borrowings outstanding under the facility, although our
availability was limited to $85 as a result of covenant
restraints and $15 utilized through an issued letter of credit
in support of our self-insured workers compensation
program. We had no draws against our standby letters of credit
during 2010. As of February 25, 2011 and February 26,
2010, we were in compliance with all covenants under the
facility. |
|
|
|
In addition, we have a $15.5 committed revolving bank facility
which is utilized primarily for standby letters of credit in
support of our self-insured workers compensation program.
As of February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010 we had
$14.5 and $3.0, respectively, in outstanding standby letters of
credit against this facility. We had no draws against our
standby letters of credit during 2011 or 2010. |
|
(4) |
|
During Q2 2010, we borrowed $47.0 at a floating interest rate
based on
30-day LIBOR
plus 3.35%. The loan has a term of seven years and requires
fixed monthly principal payments of $0.2 based on a
20-year
amortization schedule with a $30 balloon payment due in Q2 2017.
The loan is secured by our two corporate aircraft, contains no
financial covenants and is not cross-defaulted to our other debt
facilities. |
|
(5) |
|
We have agreements with certain financial institutions which
provide for borrowings on unsecured uncommitted short-term
credit facilities of up to $4.0 of U.S. dollar obligations and
$39.8 of foreign currency obligations as of February 25,
2011. Interest rates are variable and determined by each
agreement at the time of borrowing. These agreements expire
within one year, but may be renewed annually, subject to certain
conditions and may be changed or cancelled by the banks at any
time. Borrowings on these facilities as of February 25,
2011 and February 26, 2010 were $3.0 and $4.6, respectively. |
|
(6) |
|
The weighted-average interest rates for short-term borrowings
and the current portion of long-term debt were 6.5% and 5.1% as
of February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010,
respectively. |
The annual maturities of short-term borrowings and long-term
debt for each of the following five years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending in February
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
2012
|
|
|
$
|
255.5
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
2016 and after
|
|
|
|
283.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
546.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our $125 global committed, syndicated credit facility expires in
Q4 2013. At our option, and subject to certain conditions, we
may increase the aggregate commitment under the facility by up
to $75 by obtaining at least one commitment from one or more
lenders. Borrowings under this facility are unsecured and
unsubordinated.
69
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
We can use borrowings under the facility for general corporate
purposes, including friendly acquisitions. Interest on
borrowings under the facility is based on one of the following
two options, as selected by us:
|
|
|
|
|
The Eurocurrency rate plus the applicable margin as set forth in
the credit agreement, for interest periods of one, two, three or
six months, or
|
|
|
|
For Floating Rate Loans (as defined in the credit agreement),
the highest of the prime rate, the Federal funds effective rate
plus 0.5% and the Eurocurrency rate for a one month interest
period plus 1%, plus the applicable margin as set forth in the
credit agreement.
|
The facility requires us to satisfy two financial covenants:
|
|
|
|
|
A maximum leverage ratio covenant, which is measured by the
ratio of Indebtedness (as defined in the credit agreement),
minus the amount, if any, of Liquidity (as defined in the credit
agreement) in excess of $25, to trailing four quarter Adjusted
EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement, and which includes
adjustments for certain cash dividends received, extraordinary
or unusual non-cash gains and losses, impairments and cash
restructuring charges) and is required to be no greater than
3.0:1.
|
|
|
|
A minimum interest coverage ratio covenant, which is measured by
the ratio of trailing four quarter Adjusted EBITDA to trailing
four quarter interest expense and is required to be no less than
3.5:1.
|
The facility requires us to comply with certain other terms and
conditions, including a restricted payment covenant which
establishes a maximum level of dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions or payments (such as share
repurchases) we may make in a fiscal year. We are permitted to
make dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions or payments of up to $25 per year
provided we remain compliant with the financial covenants and
other conditions set forth in the credit agreement. We are
permitted to make dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions or payments in excess of $25 in a
fiscal year to the extent that our Liquidity and Leverage Ratio
(as defined in the credit agreement) meet certain thresholds set
forth in the credit agreement.
As of February 25, 2011, we were in compliance with all
covenants under the facility.
|
|
13.
|
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
PLAN OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Employee Benefit Plan Obligations
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Defined contribution retirement plans
|
|
|
$
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
Post-retirement medical benefits
|
|
|
|
110.5
|
|
|
|
|
131.8
|
|
Defined benefit pension plans
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
|
38.4
|
|
Deferred compensation plans and agreements
|
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185.5
|
|
|
|
|
206.2
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
|
$
|
170.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
189.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined
Contribution Retirement Plans
|
Substantially all of our U.S. employees are eligible to
participate in defined contribution retirement plans, primarily
the Steelcase Inc. Retirement Plan (the Retirement
Plan). Company contributions, including discretionary
profit sharing and 401(k) matching contributions, and employee
401(k) pre-tax contributions, fund the Retirement Plan. All
contributions are made to a trust which is held for the sole
70
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
benefit of participants. Company contributions for this plan are
discretionary and can be declared by the Compensation Committee
of our Board of Directors any time during each fiscal year. In
2010 and 2011, there were no discretionary profit sharing
contributions to the Retirement Plan, and we suspended our
401(k) matching contributions in Q1 2010. In Q3 2011, we
reinstated our 401(k) matching contributions, and we expect to
reinstate discretionary profit sharing contributions in 2012.
Our other defined contribution retirement plans provide for
matching contributions
and/or
discretionary contributions declared by management.
Total expense under all defined contribution retirement plans
was $3.4 for 2011, $1.7 for 2010 and $27.5 for 2009. We expect
to fund approximately $14.1 related to our defined contribution
plans in 2012, including funding related to our expectation to
reinstate discretionary profit sharing contributions in 2012.
|
|
|
Post-Retirement
Medical Benefits
|
We maintain post-retirement benefit plans that provide medical
and life insurance benefits to certain North American-based
retirees and eligible dependents. The plans were frozen to new
participants in 2003. We accrue the cost of post-retirement
benefits during the service periods of employees based on
actuarial calculations for each plan. These plans are unfunded,
but our investments in whole life COLI policies are
intended to be utilized as a long-term funding source for these
benefit obligations. See Note 9 for additional information.
While we do not expect the timing of cash flows to match, we
intend to hold the policies until maturity, and we expect the
policies will generate insufficient cash to cover the obligation
payments over the next several years and generate excess cash in
later years.
In Q3 2011, we changed the cost sharing provisions of the
post-retirement benefit plan that provides medical benefits to
certain North American-based retirees and eligible dependents,
which increased the required contributions for certain retirees.
This amendment resulted in a decrease in the accumulated
post-retirement projected benefit obligation of $24.4.
The Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act
of 2003 (the Medicare Act) entitles employers who
provide certain prescription drug benefits for retirees to
receive a federal subsidy, thereby creating the potential for
benefit cost savings. We provide retiree drug benefits through
our U.S. post-retirement benefit plans that exceed the
value of the benefits that will be provided by Medicare
Part D. On March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act was signed into law. As a result of this
legislation, we are no longer eligible to receive a tax
deduction for the portion of prescription drug expenses
reimbursed under the Medicare Part D subsidy. This change
resulted in a reduction of our deferred tax assets and a
corresponding charge to income tax expense of $11.4 during Q1
2011. See Note 15 for additional information. Aside from
the tax status change of the Medicare Part D subsidy, the
legislation did not have a material effect on our consolidated
financial statements and we will continue to evaluate the impact
it will have on our operating costs in the future.
71
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
Defined
Benefit Pension Plans
|
Our defined benefit pension plans include various qualified
domestic and foreign retirement plans as well as non-qualified
supplemental retirement plans that are limited to a select group
of management approved by the Compensation Committee. The
benefit plan obligations for the non-qualified supplemental
retirement plans are primarily related to the Steelcase Inc.
Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan. This plan is unfunded,
but our investments in whole life COLI policies are intended to
be utilized as a long-term funding source for these benefit
obligations. See Note 9 for additional information. The
funded status of our defined benefit pension plans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified Plans
|
|
|
|
Non-qualified
|
|
|
|
Qualified Plans
|
|
|
|
Non-qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
|
|
Defined Benefit Pension Plan Obligations
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plans
|
|
Plan assets
|
|
|
$
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
41.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
36.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Projected benefit plan obligations
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
48.4
|
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(28.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(26.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term asset
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Current liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
Long-term liability
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(23.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefit plan obligations
|
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(28.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(26.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
$
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
46.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
45.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
24.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
Summary
Disclosures for Defined Benefit Pension and Post-retirement
Plans
|
The following tables summarize our defined benefit pension and
post-retirement plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
|
|
|
|
Post-Retirement
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Changes in Benefit Obligations, Assets and Funded Status
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Change in benefit obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit plan obligations, beginning of year
|
|
|
$
|
83.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
66.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
131.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
117.7
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
Amendments
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
Net actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare subsidies received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Currency changes
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Adjustment due to plan curtailment
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment due to plan settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(19.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit plan obligations, end of year
|
|
|
|
87.3
|
|
|
|
|
83.0
|
|
|
|
|
110.5
|
|
|
|
|
131.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
|
35.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
Estimated Medicare subsidies received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Currency changes
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(19.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, end of year
|
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
$
|
(37.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(38.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(110.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(131.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid pension costs
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Current liability
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)
|
Long-term liability
|
|
|
|
(35.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(36.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(101.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(122.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
|
$
|
(37.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(38.3
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(110.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(131.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss)pretax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
$
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.9
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
(45.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(29.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)pretax
|
|
|
$
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(35.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(21.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated amounts to be amortized from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) into net periodic benefit cost over
the next fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)pretax
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
Post-retirement Plans
|
|
Components of
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Expense and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Assumptions
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Components of expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Amortization of net loss (gain)
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Amortization of prior year service cost (credit)
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment due to plan curtailment
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Adjustment due to plan settlement
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment due to special termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expense
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense recognized in beginning retained earnings (change in
measurement date)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expense recognized in consolidated statements of operations
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
Post-retirement Plans
|
|
Components of
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Expense and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Assumptions
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations
recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) (pre-tax):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (gain)
|
|
|
$
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
(12.9
|
)
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
(24.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Amortization of prior year service credit (cost)
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Prior service cost recognized as a part of curtailment/
settlement
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other
comprehensive income (loss) (pre-tax)
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
|
5.10
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
6.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.34
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.88
|
%
|
|
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
Rate of salary progression
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
|
5.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
7.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
6.10
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
%
|
|
|
|
7.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
6.40
|
%
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of salary progression
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
75
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The measurement dates for our retiree benefit plans are
consistent with our fiscal year-end. Accordingly, we select
discount rates to measure our benefit obligations that are
consistent with market indices at the end of each year. In
evaluating the expected return on plan assets, we considered the
expected long-term rate of return on plan assets based on the
specific allocation of assets for each plan, an analysis of
current market conditions and the views of leading financial
advisors and economists.
The assumed healthcare cost trend was 8.58% for pre-age 65
retirees and 6.86% for post-age 65 retirees as of
February 25, 2011, gradually declining to 4.50% after nine
years. As of February 26, 2010, the assumed healthcare cost
trend was 10.0% for pre-age 65 retirees and 6.0% for
post-age 65 retirees, gradually declining to 4.5% after
10 years. A one percentage point change in assumed
healthcare cost trend rates would have had the following effects
as of February 25, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One percentage
|
|
|
One percentage
|
Health Cost Trend Sensitivity
|
|
|
point increase
|
|
|
point decrease
|
Effect on total of service and interest cost components
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2.0
|
)
|
The investments of the domestic plans are managed by third-party
investment managers. The investment strategy for the domestic
plans is to maximize returns while taking into consideration the
investment horizon and expected volatility to ensure there are
sufficient assets to pay benefits as they come due.
The investments of the foreign plans are managed by third-party
investment managers. These investment managers follow local
regulations; we are not actively involved in the investment
strategies. In general, the investment strategy is designed to
accumulate a diversified portfolio among markets, assets classes
or individual securities in order to reduce market risk and
assure that the pension assets are available to pay benefits as
they come due.
Our pension plans weighted-average investment allocation
strategies and weighted-average target asset allocations by
asset category as of February 25, 2011 and
February 26, 2010 are reflected in the following table. The
target allocations are established by the investment committees
of each plan in consultation with external advisors after
consideration of the associated risk and expected return of the
underlying investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
|
Allocations
|
|
|
|
Allocations
|
|
|
|
Allocations
|
|
|
|
Allocations
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Other (1)
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents guaranteed insurance contracts, money market funds
and cash. |
76
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The fair value of the pension plan assets as of
February 25, 2011, by asset category are as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
Fair Value of Pension Plan Assets
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. large-cap (1)
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
U.S. small-cap (1)
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
U.S. index (1)
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
International (1)
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bond funds (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
Other investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group annuity contract (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Insurance products (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
Guaranteed insurance contracts (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Property funds (1)
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
Fair Value of Pension Plan Assets
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. large-cap (1)
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
U.S. small-cap (1)
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
U.S. index (1)
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
International (1)
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bond funds (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Other investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group annuity contract (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Insurance products (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
Guaranteed insurance contracts (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Property funds (1)
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
44.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These investments are valued utilizing a market approach that
includes various valuation techniques and sources such as the
net asset value per share multiplied by the number of shares
held as of the measurement date, broker quotes in active markets
and reported trades. |
|
(2) |
|
Group annuity contracts are valued utilizing a discounted cash
flow model. The term cash flow refers to the future
principal and interest payments we expect to receive on a given
asset in the general account. The model projects future cash
flows separately for each investment period and each category of
investment. |
|
(3) |
|
Guaranteed insurance contracts are valued at book value, which
approximates fair value, and is calculated using the prior year
balance plus or minus investment returns and changes in cash
flows. |
77
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
During 2011, we determined that certain securities previously
presented in the Level 1 category should have been
presented in the Level 2 category based on the observable
inputs used to value the securities. We have reclassified and
corrected bond funds from Level 1 to Level 2 in the
2010 table above. The reclassification had no impact on
investment values reported in 2010 and had no effect on the 2010
consolidated financial statements.
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of
the fair value hierarchy for any periods presented.
Below is a roll-forward of plan assets measured at estimated
fair value using Level 3 inputs for the year ended
February 25, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed
|
|
|
|
|
Annuity
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
Roll-forward of Fair Value Using Level 3 Inputs
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
Balance as of March 1, 2009
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.4
|
|
Unrealized return on plan assets, including changes in foreign
exchange rates
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Purchases, sales, and other, net
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of February 27, 2010
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized return on plan assets, including changes in foreign
exchange rates
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Purchases, sales, and other, net
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of February 25, 2011
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We expect to contribute approximately $4 to our pension plans
and fund approximately $10 related to our post-retirement plans
in 2012. Our estimated future cash outflows for benefit payments
under our pension and post-retirement plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-retirement Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare Act
|
|
|
Medicare Act
|
|
|
After Medicare
|
|
|
Year Ending in February
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
|
Subsidy
|
|
|
Subsidy
|
|
|
Act Subsidy
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-2021
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
|
|
|
(12.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
Compensation Programs
We maintain four deferred compensation programs. The first
deferred compensation program is closed to new entrants. In this
program, certain employees elected to defer a portion of their
compensation in return for a fixed benefit to be paid in
installments beginning when the participant reaches age 70.
Under the second plan, certain employees may elect to defer a
portion of their compensation. The third plan is intended to
restore retirement benefits that would otherwise be paid under
the Retirement Plan, but are precluded as a result of the
limitations on eligible compensation under Internal Revenue Code
Section 401(a)(17). Under the fourth plan, our non-employee
directors may elect to defer
78
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
all or a portion of their board retainer and committee fees. The
deferred amounts in the last three plans earn a return based on
the investment option selected by the participant.
These deferred compensation obligations are unfunded, but our
investments in whole life COLI policies are intended to be
utilized as a long-term funding source for these deferred
compensation obligations. See Note 9 for additional
information.
Deferred compensation expense, which represents annual
participant earnings on amounts that have been deferred, and
restoration retirement benefits were $5.1 for 2011, $5.1 for
2010 and ($0.5) for 2009. The deferred compensation benefit
recorded in 2009 is due to the downturn in the financial markets
which produced negative net returns to participants for the year
and reduced our obligations beyond the compensation deferrals
made during the year.
Terms of
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common
Stock
The holders of common stock are generally entitled to vote as a
single class on all matters upon which shareholders have a right
to vote, subject to the requirements of applicable laws and the
rights of any outstanding series of preferred stock to vote as a
separate class. Each share of Class A Common Stock entitles
its holder to one vote and each share of Class B Common
Stock entitles its holder to 10 votes. Each share of
Class B Common Stock is convertible into a share of
Class A Common Stock on a
one-for-one
basis (i) at the option of the holder at any time,
(ii) upon transfer to a person or entity which is not a
Permitted Transferee (as defined in our Second Restated Articles
of Incorporation), (iii) with respect to shares of
Class B Common Stock acquired after February 20, 1998,
at such time as a corporation, partnership, limited liability
company, trust or charitable organization holding such shares
ceases to be controlled or owned 100% by Permitted Transferees
and (iv) on the date on which the number of shares of
Class B Common Stock outstanding is less than 15% of all of
the then outstanding shares of common stock (calculated without
regard to voting rights).
Except for the voting and conversion features described above,
the terms of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common
Stock are generally similar. That is, the holders are entitled
to equal dividends when declared by the Board of Directors and
generally will receive the same per share consideration in the
event of a merger and be treated on an equal per share basis in
the event of a liquidation or winding up of the Company. In
addition, we are not entitled to issue additional shares of
Class B Common Stock, or issue options, rights or warrants
to subscribe for additional shares of Class B Common Stock,
except that we may make a pro rata offer to all holders of
common stock of rights to purchase additional shares of the
class of common stock held by them, and any dividend payable in
common stock will be paid in the form of Class A Common
Stock to Class A holders and Class B Common Stock to
Class B holders. Neither class of stock may be split,
divided or combined unless the other class is proportionally
split, divided or combined.
Preferred
Stock
Our Second Restated Articles of Incorporation authorize our
Board of Directors, without any vote or action by our
shareholders, to create one or more series of preferred stock up
to the limit of our authorized but unissued shares of preferred
stock and to fix the designations, preferences, rights,
qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof, including
the voting rights, dividend rights, dividend rate, conversion
rights, terms of redemption (including sinking fund provisions),
redemption price or prices, liquidation preferences and the
number of shares constituting any series.
79
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Share
Repurchases and Conversions
During 2011, we repurchased 1.0 million shares of our
Class A Common Stock for $10.8. During 2010, we repurchased
1.1 million shares of our Class A Common Stock for
$4.6. During 2011 and 2010, 8.4 million and
3.0 million shares of our Class B Common Stock were
converted to Class A Common Stock, respectively.
Provision for
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes on income (loss) before income
taxes consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Provision for Income TaxesExpense (Benefit)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Current income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
(22.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(1.7
|
)
|
State and local
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
|
(17.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxestemporary differences:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
State and local
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(12.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxesother:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare reform legislation
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments arising due to changes in tax rates
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance adjustments
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
$
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes were based on the following sources of income
(loss) before income tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Source of income (loss) Before Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
$
|
39.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(56.2
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
(28.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
47.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
51.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(31.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The total income tax expense we recognized is reconciled to that
computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of
35% as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Income Tax Provision (Benefit) Reconciliation
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Tax expense at the U.S. federal statutory rate
|
|
|
$
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(3.1
|
)
|
Healthcare reform (1)
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COLI (income) loss (2)
|
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
Tax balance adjustment (3)
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign operations, less applicable foreign tax credit
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
Valuation allowance provisions and adjustments (4)
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
U.S. research tax credit
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
Medicare Part D benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
Goodwill impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
Tax reserve adjustments (5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense recognized
|
|
|
$
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In Q1 2011, the U.S. enacted significant healthcare reform
legislation which effectively changed the tax treatment of the
federal subsidies received by employers who provide certain
prescription drug benefits for retirees (the Medicare
Part D subsidy) for fiscal years beginning after
December 31, 2012. We had previously recorded deferred tax
assets based on the liability for post-retirement benefit
obligations related to prescription drug benefits for retirees.
As a result of the law change during Q1 2011, deferred tax
assets were reduced as these obligations will no longer be
deductible for purposes of determining taxable income to the
extent they are reimbursed by the Medicare Part D subsidy. |
|
(2) |
|
The net returns in cash surrender value, normal insurance
expenses and death benefit gains related to our investments in
COLI policies are non-taxable. |
|
(3) |
|
The tax balance adjustment related to prior periods. Management
has evaluated the relevant qualitative and quantitative factors
related to these adjustments and concluded that had the
adjustments been recorded in the appropriate period the impact
individually and in the aggregate would not have been material
to the current or previously reported financial information for
any prior fiscal year. |
|
(4) |
|
Valuation allowances have been recognized when, based on
available evidence, it is considered more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. Valuation allowances were adjusted to reflect current
market conditions, changes in profitability expectations and
implementation of certain tax planning strategies. |
|
(5) |
|
Tax reserves were adjusted in 2009 as a result of the completion
of a multi-year audit in the U.S. |
81
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The significant components of deferred income taxes are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefit plan obligations
|
|
|
$
|
96.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
120.3
|
|
Foreign and domestic net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
|
96.1
|
|
|
|
|
89.6
|
|
Reserves and accruals
|
|
|
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
|
31.8
|
|
Tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
269.0
|
|
|
|
|
277.9
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
(34.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(38.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
234.1
|
|
|
|
|
239.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
34.5
|
|
|
|
|
37.4
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
|
50.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income taxes
|
|
|
$
|
185.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
189.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income taxes is comprised of the following
components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assetscurrent
|
|
|
$
|
58.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
49.6
|
|
Deferred income tax assetsnon-current
|
|
|
|
132.2
|
|
|
|
|
144.5
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilitiescurrent
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilitiesnon-current
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
In general, it is our practice and intention to reinvest the
earnings of our non U.S. subsidiaries in those operations.
Under U.S. GAAP, we are generally required to record
U.S. deferred taxes on the anticipated repatriation of
foreign income as the income is recognized for financial
reporting purposes. An exception under certain accounting
guidance permits us not to record a U.S. deferred tax
liability for foreign income that we expect to reinvest in
foreign operations and for which remittance will be postponed
indefinitely. If it becomes apparent that some or all
undistributed income will be remitted in the foreseeable future,
the related deferred taxes are recorded in that period. In
determining indefinite reinvestment we regularly evaluate the
capital needs of our foreign operations considering all
available information, including operating and capital plans,
regulatory capital requirements, debt requirements and cash flow
needs, as well as, the applicable tax laws to which our foreign
subsidiaries are subject. Our estimates are based on our
historical experience and our expectation of future performance.
Our judgments and assumptions are subject to change given the
inherent uncertainty in predicting future capital needs. As of
February 25, 2011, we have not made a provision for
U.S. or additional foreign withholding taxes on
approximately $237.2 of unremitted foreign income we considered
permanently reinvested.
82
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
Current Taxes
Payable or Refundable
|
Income taxes currently payable or refundable are reported on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Current Income Taxes
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Other current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expensesIncome taxes payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating
Loss and Tax Credit Carryforwards
|
Operating loss and tax credit carryforwards expire as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carryforwards (Gross)
|
|
|
|
Tax Effected Net Operating Loss Carryforwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Credit
|
|
Year Ending February
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Carryforwards
|
|
2012
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
2016-2031
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
174.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
No expiration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79.4
|
|
|
|
|
79.4
|
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
178.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
258.0
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
83.0
|
|
|
|
|
96.1
|
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(31.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(32.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
51.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
63.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
35.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future tax benefits for net operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards are recognized to the extent that realization of
these benefits is considered more likely than not. It is
considered more likely than not that a benefit of $98.6 will be
realized on these net operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards. This determination is based on the expectation
that related operations will be sufficiently profitable or
various tax, business and other planning strategies available to
us will enable utilization of the carryforwards. We assess the
available positive and negative evidence to estimate if
sufficient future taxable income will be generated to utilize
the existing deferred tax assets.
As of February 25, 2011, we have recorded a partial
valuation allowance of $27.8 on certain net operating loss
carryforwards of $76.6. These carryforward benefits relate to
jurisdictions that allow indefinite carryforward periods and in
which we have reported cumulative operating losses in the most
recent three years. Our judgment regarding the utilization of
these net operating losses is based on our conclusion that we
have sufficient evidence that it is more likely than not that we
will generate future taxable income in these jurisdictions. The
key factors that we considered in our analysis included the
impact of restructuring activities and tax planning strategies,
as well as the impact of the cyclical nature of our business on
future sales levels. Our judgment related to the realization of
the deferred tax assets is based on current and expected market
conditions and could change in the event market conditions and
our profitability in these jurisdictions differ significantly
from our current estimates.
83
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
We are subject to taxation in the U.S. and various states
and foreign jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitation.
While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the
timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position,
we believe our liability for uncertain tax positions reflects
the most likely outcome. We adjust these reserves, as well as
the related interest, in light of changing facts and
circumstances.
We are audited by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service under
the Compliance Assurance Process (CAP). Under CAP,
the U.S. Internal Revenue Service works with large business
taxpayers to identify and resolve issues prior to the filing of
a tax return. Accordingly, we record minimal liabilities for
U.S. Federal uncertain tax positions.
We recognize interest and penalties associated with uncertain
tax positions in income tax expense, and these items were not
material for 2011 and 2010.
As of February 25, 2011 and February 26, 2010, the
liability for uncertain tax positions, including interest and
penalties, reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Liability for Uncertain Tax Positions
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Accrued expensesincome taxes payable
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Balance as of beginning of period
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.5
|
|
Gross increasestax positions in prior period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross decreasestax positions in prior period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross increasestax positions in current period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Tax examination results 2004 through 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of end of period
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits reported would
affect our effective tax rate. We do not expect the balance of
unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase or decrease
within the next 12 months.
We have taken a tax position in a non U.S. jurisdiction
that does not meet the more likely than not test required under
the uncertain tax position accounting guidance. Accordingly, we
have not recognized the benefit in our financial statements and
have not recorded a tax liability related to this uncertain tax
position. If we prevail on this tax position, our financial
statements would reflect an increase in non-current deferred tax
assets and a decrease in tax expense of $2.2.
84
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan (the
Incentive Compensation Plan) provides for the
issuance of share-based compensation awards to employees and
members of the Board of Directors. There are
25,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock reserved for
issuance under our Incentive Compensation Plan, with 11,218,065
and 12,454,945 shares remaining for future issuance under
our Incentive Compensation Plan as of February 25, 2011 and
February 26, 2010, respectively.
A variety of awards may be granted under the Incentive
Compensation Plan including stock options, stock appreciation
rights (SARs), restricted stock, restricted stock
units, performance shares, performance units, cash-based awards,
phantom shares and other share-based awards. Outstanding awards
under the Incentive Compensation Plan vest over a period of one,
three or five years or at the time a participant becomes a
qualified retiree. Stock options granted under the Incentive
Compensation Plan may be either incentive stock options intended
to qualify under Section 422 of the Code or non-qualified
stock options not so intended. The Board may amend or terminate
the Incentive Compensation Plan at its discretion subject to
certain provisions as stipulated within the plan.
Awards currently outstanding under the Incentive Compensation
Plan are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
Total Outstanding Awards
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
|
3,566
|
|
Restricted stock units
|
|
|
|
496,151
|
|
Performance units (1)
|
|
|
|
3,024,000
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
3,149,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total outstanding awards
|
|
|
|
6,672,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This amount includes the maximum number of shares that may be
issued under outstanding performance unit awards; however, the
actual number of shares which may be issued will be determined
based on the satisfaction of certain criteria, and therefore may
be significantly lower. |
We have not granted any non-qualified stock option awards since
2003. All options granted had a
10-year
term, and thus all outstanding stock options will expire by the
end of 2013. Subsequent to 2003, we have used restricted stock,
restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units
as the primary share-based compensation awards, and the majority
of the outstanding awards as of February 25, 2011 are held
by our executive officers.
In the event of a change of control, as defined in
the Incentive Compensation Plan,
|
|
|
|
|
all outstanding options and SARs granted under the Incentive
Compensation Plan will become immediately exercisable and remain
exercisable throughout their entire term;
|
|
|
|
any performance-based conditions imposed with respect to
outstanding awards shall be deemed to be fully earned and a pro
rata portion of each such outstanding award granted for all
outstanding performance periods shall become payable in shares
of Class A Common Stock, in the case of awards denominated
in shares of Class A Common Stock, and in cash, in the case
of awards denominated in cash, with the remainder of such award
being canceled for no value; and
|
|
|
|
all restrictions imposed on restricted stock and restricted
stock units that are not performance-based shall lapse.
|
85
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
Restricted
Stock and Restricted Stock Units
|
Restricted shares of Class A Common Stock and restricted
stock units (RSUs) have restrictions on transfer
which lapse one, three or five years (depending on the terms of
the individual grant) after the date of grant, at which time
restricted shares are converted to, and RSUs are issued as,
unrestricted shares of Class A Common Stock. These awards
are subject to forfeiture if a participant leaves our company
for reasons other than retirement, disability, death or
termination by us without cause prior to the vesting date.
Restricted shares are expensed and recorded in Class A
Common Stock on the Consolidated Balance Sheets over the
requisite service period based on the value of the shares on the
grant date. RSUs are expensed and recorded in Additional
paid-in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheets over the
requisite service period based on the value of the shares on the
grant date.
Total restricted stock and RSU expense and the associated tax
benefit in 2011, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
February 27,
|
Restricted Stock and RSUs
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
Expense
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Holders of restricted stock and RSUs receive cash dividends
equal to the dividends we declare and pay on our Class A
Common Stock, which are included in Dividends paid on the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The 2011 activity for restricted stock and RSUs is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Nonvested Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
Nonvested as of February 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
25,166
|
|
|
|
|
457,078
|
|
|
|
|
482,244
|
|
|
|
|
9.30
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,800
|
|
|
|
|
275,800
|
|
|
|
|
8.69
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
(21,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
(231,227
|
)
|
|
|
|
(252,827
|
)
|
|
|
|
8.90
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
7.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested as of February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
3,566
|
|
|
|
|
496,151
|
|
|
|
|
499,717
|
|
|
|
|
7.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was $2.3 of remaining unrecognized compensation cost
related to restricted stock and RSUs as of February 25,
2011. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.4 years. The total fair value
of restricted stock and RSUs vested was $2.3, $1.4 and $4.2
during 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
February 27,
|
Grant Date Fair Value per Share
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share of restricted
shares and RSUs granted during 2011, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
$
|
8.69
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.97
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Performance
Shares and Performance Units
Performance shares and performance units have been granted only
to our executive officers. These awards are earned after a
three-year performance period and only if the performance
criteria stated in the applicable award are achieved. The
performance shares and performance units granted in 2011, 2010
and 2009 can be earned based on the achievement of certain total
shareholder return (TSR) results. The 2009 awards
can be earned 50% based on the absolute level of our TSR and 50%
based on the performance of our TSR relative to a comparison
group of companies (relative TSR). Based on the
actual performance results, no shares were earned under the 2009
awards. The 2010 and 2011 awards can be earned based 100% on
relative TSR, and a number of shares equal to 25% of the target
level of each 2010 and 2011 award will be earned if the
participant remains employed through the end of the performance
period, or retires during the performance period, whether or not
the minimum performance level is achieved. The minimum award
will be forfeited if a participant leaves our company for
reasons other than retirement, disability, death or termination
without cause prior to the vesting date. The remainder of the
2011 and 2010 awards will be forfeited if a participant leaves
our company for reasons other than retirement, disability or
death. The number of shares that may be earned can range from
25% to 200% of the target amount for the 2010 and 2011 awards.
The aggregate number of shares of Class A Common Stock that
ultimately may be issued under performance shares or units where
the performance period has not been completed ranges from
390,500 to 3,024,000 shares as of February 25, 2011.
For performance units granted during 2011 and 2010, participants
receive a cash dividend equivalent based on the underlying
target award during the performance period equal to the
dividends we declare and pay on our Class A Common Stock,
which are included in Dividends paid on the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows. For performance shares granted during
2009, a dividend equivalent is calculated on the basis of the
actual number of shares earned at the end of the applicable
performance period, equal to the dividends that would have been
payable on the earned shares had they been held during the
entire performance period. At the end of the performance period,
the dividend equivalents are paid in the form of cash or
Class A Common Stock at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. Based on the actual performance results, no dividend
equivalents were paid under the 2009 awards.
After completion of the performance period, the number of
performance shares or performance units earned will be issued as
shares of Class A Common Stock. Performance shares and
performance units are expensed and recorded in Additional
paid-in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheets over the
performance periods. The fair value of the performance shares
and performance units awarded during 2011, 2010 and 2009 were
calculated on the grant date using the Monte Carlo simulation
model, which resulted in a fair value of $7.1, $5.6 and $0.6
during 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Monte Carlo
simulation was computed using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Awards
|
|
|
2010 Awards
|
|
|
2009 Awards
|
Three-year risk-free interest rate (1)
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
Expected term
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Estimated volatility (2)
|
|
|
|
49.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
Dividend yield (3)
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share
|
|
|
$
|
9.14
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on the U.S. government bond benchmark on the grant date. |
87
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Represents the historical price volatility of the Companys
common stock for the three-year period preceding the grant date. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the Companys cash dividend yield over the
expected term of the shares. The dividend yield for the 2011 and
2010 awards is not meaningful as the participants are paid
dividend equivalents during the performance period. |
The performance shares and performance units expense and
associated tax benefit in 2011, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
February 27,
|
Performance Shares and Performance Units
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
Expense
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2011 activity for performance shares and performance units
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Maximum Number of Nonvested Shares
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair Value per Share (3)
|
|
Nonvested as of February 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
1,766,000
|
|
|
|
|
3.54
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
1,558,000
|
|
|
|
|
4.57
|
|
Adjustments (1)
|
|
|
|
(300,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested as of February 25, 2011 (2)
|
|
|
|
3,024,000
|
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjustments included a reduction of 300,000 shares because
no shares vested at the end of the performance period for the
2009 awards. |
|
(2) |
|
Total nonvested shares include 390,500 shares, which
represents the 25% portion of the awards granted in 2011 and
2010 which are not subject to performance conditions. |
|
(3) |
|
The fair value per share presented in this table has been
adjusted to align with the presentation of the awards at maximum. |
As of February 25, 2011, there was $3.9 of remaining
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested performance
shares and performance units. That cost is expected to be
recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of
1.7 years. The total fair value of performance shares and
performance units vested was $0, $0.1, and $0.5 during 2011,
2010 and 2009, respectively.
88
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Information relating to our stock options is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Option Price
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
Unexercised Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
|
(millions)
|
|
February 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
3,554,220
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited and expired
|
|
|
|
(405,140
|
)
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
3,149,080
|
|
|
|
|
13.91
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The exercise price per share of options outstanding ranged from
$9.73 to $16.03 as of February 25, 2011 and $9.46 to $16.03
as of February 26, 2010. All unexercised options
outstanding as of February 25, 2011 were exercisable.
Information relating to the intrinsic value of option exercises
under all share-based payment arrangements is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
February 27,
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
Intrinsic value of options exercised
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted
Share Grants
|
Under the Incentive Compensation Plan, unrestricted shares may
be issued to members of the Board of Directors as compensation
for directors fees, as a result of directors
elections to receive unrestricted shares in lieu of cash
payment. We granted a total of 41,720, 44,346 and 29,534
unrestricted shares at a weighted average grant date fair value
per share of $7.73, $5.44 and $9.52 during 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
|
|
17.
|
COMMITMENTS AND
GUARANTEES
|
We lease certain sales offices, showrooms, warehouses and
equipment under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at
various dates through 2021. During the normal course of
business, we have entered into sale-leaseback arrangements for
certain facilities. Accordingly, these leases are accounted for
as operating leases and the related gains from the sale of the
properties are recorded as deferred gains and are amortized over
the lease term. In Q3 2011, we completed the sale and leaseback
of a facility in Malaysia, which generated $13.0 of cash and
resulted in a $3.2 pre-tax gain. We deferred the entire amount
of this gain over the six-year lease term associated with the
space we are leasing back. In Q4 2011, we completed the sale and
leaseback of a facility in Canada, which generated $24.7 of cash
and resulted in a $15.9 pre-tax gain. We recognized $10.6 of
this gain as a restructuring item in Q4 2011 and deferred the
remaining gain over the five-year lease term associated with the
space we are leasing back. Total deferred gains, including the
facilities in Malaysia and Canada, are included as a component
of Other long-term liabilities, on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets and amounted to $20.8 as of February 25,
2011 and $15.4 as of February 26, 2010.
89
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Our estimated future minimum annual rental commitments and
sublease rental income under non-cancelable operating leases are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum annual
|
|
|
|
Minimum annual
|
|
|
|
Minimum annual
|
|
Year Ending in February
|
|
|
rental commitments
|
|
|
|
sublease rental income
|
|
|
|
rental commitments, net
|
|
2012
|
|
|
$
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
41.1
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
38.4
|
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
35.4
|
|
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
194.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
(31.4
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
163.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense under all operating leases, net of sublease rental
income and excluding lease impairment charges recorded as
restructuring costs, was $41.4 for 2011, $45.8 for 2010 and
$44.6 for 2009. Sublease rental income was $5.0 for 2011, $6.8
for 2010 and $8.4 for 2009. Lease impairment charges recorded as
restructuring costs were $1.2 for 2011, $1.2 for 2010 and $3.3
for 2009.
We have outstanding capital expenditure commitments of $37.4,
with $19.8 related to the purchase of a new corporate aircraft
intended to replace an existing aircraft.
|
|
|
Guarantees and
Performance Bonds
|
The maximum amount of future payments (undiscounted and without
reduction for any amounts that may possibly be recovered from
third parties) we could be required to make under guarantees and
performance bonds are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
Guarantees and Performance Bonds
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Performance bonds
|
|
|
$
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
23.9
|
|
Guarantees
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
25.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are party to performance bonds for certain installation or
construction activities of certain dealers. Under these
agreements, we are liable to make financial payments if the
installation or construction activities are not completed under
their specified guidelines and claims are filed. Projects with
performance bonds have completion dates typically around one
year. Where we have supplied performance bonds, we have the
ability to step in and cure performance failures thereby
mitigating our potential losses. No loss has been experienced
under these performance bonds, and we had no reserves recorded
related to our potential exposure as of February 25, 2011
and February 26, 2010.
We are contingently liable under guarantees to third parties for
the benefit of certain dealers in the event of default of a
financial obligation. The guarantees generally have terms
ranging from one to five years. We had no reserves recorded
related to these guarantees as of February 25, 2011 and
February 26, 2010.
We occasionally provide guarantees of the performance of certain
of our dealers to third parties. These performance guarantees
typically relate to dealer services such as delivery and
installation of products. In the event a dealer cannot complete
these services in a timely manner, we guarantee the
90
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
completion of these activities. It is not possible to estimate
the potential exposure under these types of guarantees because
of the conditional nature of our obligations and the unique
facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement;
however, we have never experienced a material loss as a result
of such guarantees and do not believe any potential loss would
be material.
We operate on a worldwide basis within North America and
International reportable segments plus an Other
category.
Our North America segment serves customers in the U.S. and
Canada mainly through independent dealers. Our portfolio of
integrated architecture, furniture and technology products is
marketed to corporate, government, healthcare, education and
retail customers through the Steelcase, Turnstone, Details and
Nurture by Steelcase brands.
The International segment serves customers outside of the
U.S. and Canada primarily under the Steelcase brand, with
an emphasis on freestanding furniture systems, storage and
seating solutions.
The Other category includes the Coalesse Group, PolyVision and
IDEO (through Q3 2011). The Coalesse Group is comprised of the
Coalesse and Designtex brands. Coalesse is a premium furnishings
brand that serves the markets of executive office, conference,
lounge, teaming environments and residential live/work
solutions. Designtex provides surface materials including
textiles, wall coverings, shades, screens and surface imagings
marketed primarily to architects and designers for use in
business, residential, healthcare and hospitality applications.
PolyVision designs and manufactures visual communications
products, such as static and interactive electronic whiteboards
for learning environments and office settings. IDEO is an
innovation and design firm which generates innovative solutions
and customer experience insights and serves a variety of
organizations within consumer products, financial services,
healthcare, information technology, government, transportation
and other industries. Effective the beginning of Q4 2011,
majority ownership of IDEO was transferred to certain members of
IDEO management. As a result, IDEO was deconsolidated in Q4
2011. See additional disclosure of the IDEO ownership transition
in Note 19.
We primarily review and evaluate operating income by segment in
both our internal review processes and for external financial
reporting. Total assets by segment include manufacturing assets
associated with each segment.
Corporate costs include portions of shared service functions
such as information technology, human resources, finance,
executive, corporate facilities, legal and research.
Approximately 82% of corporate expenses were charged to the
operating segments in 2011, 2010 and 2009 as part of a corporate
allocation. Unallocated corporate expenses are reported as
Corporate. Assets in Corporate consist primarily of unallocated
cash and investment balances and COLI balances.
91
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
No single customer represented more than 5% of our consolidated
revenue in 2011, 2010 or 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Segment Data
|
|
|
America
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
1,322.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
698.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
416.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,437.1
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
56.5
|
|
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
|
(14.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
624.3
|
|
|
|
|
452.5
|
|
|
|
|
168.7
|
|
|
|
|
751.0
|
|
|
|
|
1,996.5
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
46.0
|
|
Depreciation & amortization
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
64.4
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
1,237.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
641.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
412.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,291.7
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
56.4
|
|
|
|
|
(35.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
695.0
|
|
|
|
|
382.4
|
|
|
|
|
231.6
|
|
|
|
|
368.2
|
|
|
|
|
1,677.2
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.2
|
|
Depreciation & amortization
|
|
|
|
41.6
|
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
1,740.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
922.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
521.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,183.7
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
|
(79.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(27.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
712.6
|
|
|
|
|
410.3
|
|
|
|
|
226.8
|
|
|
|
|
400.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,750.0
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83.0
|
|
Depreciation & amortization
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87.3
|
|
We evaluate performance and allocate resources primarily based
on operating income. The accounting policies of each of the
reportable segments are the same as those described in
Note 2. Corporate assets increased significantly in 2011
due to the investment of the net proceeds from the 2021 Notes.
Revenue comparisons have been significantly impacted by
divestitures, deconsolidations and ownership transitions along
with currency translation effects. In addition, operating income
(loss) has been significantly impacted by variable life COLI
income, restructuring costs and impairment charges. See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for
additional information. In addition, see the Financial Summary
in Part II Item 7. Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Reportable geographic information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Reportable Geographic Data
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
$
|
1,518.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,469.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,000.6
|
|
Foreign locations
|
|
|
|
918.6
|
|
|
|
|
822.0
|
|
|
|
|
1,183.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,437.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,291.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,183.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
$
|
665.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
683.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign locations
|
|
|
|
162.4
|
|
|
|
|
185.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
828.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
868.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Revenue is attributable to countries based on the location of
the customer. No country other than the U.S. represents
greater than 10% of our consolidated revenue or long-lived
assets. In 2011, foreign revenues and long-lived assets
represented approximately 38% and 20% of consolidated amounts,
respectively. Our International business is spread across a
number of geographic regions with Western Europe representing
approximately 66% of International revenue in 2011.
Our global product offerings consist of furniture, interior
architecture, technology and services. These product offerings
are marketed, distributed and managed primarily as a group of
similar products on an overall portfolio basis. The following is
a summary of net sales by product category. As product line
information is not readily available for the Company as a whole,
this summary represents a reasonable estimate of net sales by
product category based on the best information available:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Product Category Data
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Systems and storage
|
|
|
$
|
1,036.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
944.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,454.2
|
|
Seating
|
|
|
|
678.9
|
|
|
|
|
595.9
|
|
|
|
|
740.5
|
|
Other (1)
|
|
|
|
721.6
|
|
|
|
|
751.7
|
|
|
|
|
989.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
2,437.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,291.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,183.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other consists primarily of consolidated dealers, textiles and
surface materials, static and electronic whiteboards and other
uncategorized product lines, and services, none of which are
individually greater than 10% of consolidated revenue. |
|
|
19.
|
DIVESTITURES,
DECONSOLIDATIONS AND OWNERSHIP TRANSITIONS
|
In Q2 2009, we sold Custom Cable Industries, Inc. (Custom
Cable), a wholly-owned subsidiary in our North America
segment. Total proceeds including limited seller financing were
$17.7. In connection with the sale, we recorded a loss on
disposal of $1.1 within Corporate in 2009.
For the year ended February 27, 2009, our Consolidated
Statements of Operations included the following related to
Custom Cable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
Custom Cable Divestiture
|
|
|
2009
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
In Q1 2011, based on the new accounting statement which changed
the consolidation guidance for variable interest entities, we
deconsolidated a variable interest dealer in our North America
segment which had no effect on net income. In addition, we
deconsolidated a variable interest dealer in our North America
segment in Q3 2010 after it was purchased by an independent
third party. The loss recognized upon deconsolidation was not
material.
93
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
For the year ended February 26, 2010, our Consolidated
Statements of Operations included the following related to the
consolidation of these dealers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
Dealer Deconsolidations
|
|
|
2010
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
62.7
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
IDEO Ownership
Transition
|
On December 14, 2010, certain members of the management of
IDEO purchased an additional 60% equity interest in IDEO
pursuant to an agreement entered into during 2008. We retained a
20% equity interest in IDEO, and we expect to continue our
collaborative relationship after this transition. This
transaction generated $30 of cash and resulted in a Q4 2011
pre-tax gain of $13.2 within Corporate. In Q4 2011, we
deconsolidated the operations of IDEO and recorded our share of
IDEOs earnings as equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliates in Other income (expense), net on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
For the year ended February 25, 2011, our Consolidated
Statements of Operations included the following related to IDEO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
IDEO
|
|
|
2011
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
103.4
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
47.1
|
|
Operating income (1)
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating income did not include variable compensation expense
of approximately $7 earned by IDEO management in 2011 related to
a contingent stock bonus program that was recognized and applied
toward the purchase price in Q4 2011. |
In Q1 2011, we announced a project to reorganize our European
manufacturing operations on the basis of specialized
competencies. The primary drivers of the changes included our
continued improvements in manufacturing practices, combined with
the need for manufacturing footprint optimization and further
cost reductions. During 2011, we incurred $18.6 of restructuring
costs with the majority relating to workforce reductions and
some additional costs for manufacturing consolidation and
production moves within the International segment. We expect to
incur approximately $2 of additional restructuring costs in Q1
2012 as we complete the project.
In Q4 2011, we announced the planned closure of three additional
manufacturing facilities in North America as part of our ongoing
efforts to improve the fitness of our business and strengthen
the Companys long-term competitiveness. We expect to move
production within these facilities to other Steelcase locations
in North America over the next 18 months. We estimate the
cash restructuring costs associated with these actions will be
approximately $45, with approximately $30 related to workforce
94
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
reductions and approximately $15 related to costs associated
with manufacturing consolidation and production moves. During
2011, we accrued $10.1 of restructuring costs related to this
project mainly due to workforce reductions. The North America
segment and Other category incurred costs of $9.0 and $1.1,
respectively.
The remaining restructuring costs incurred in 2011 primarily
related to several smaller actions to consolidate manufacturing
facilities and reorganize other areas of our business, offset by
a $10.6 gain recorded in North America related to the sale and
partial leaseback of a facility in Canada.
During 2010, we completed a series of actions, announced in Q2
2010, to reduce our global workforce and consolidate
manufacturing facilities. We incurred related costs associated
with these actions of $31.2, mainly attributable to employee
termination costs. The North America segment, International
segment and Other category incurred costs of $8.1, $17.7 and
$5.4, respectively.
During 2010, we completed a series of actions, announced in Q4
2009, to consolidate manufacturing and distribution facilities
in North America, reduce our white-collar workforce and other
operating costs globally and expand our white-collar reinvention
initiatives. Total related costs associated with these actions
were $17.6, including $3.7 in 2010 and $13.9 in 2009, mainly
attributable to employee termination costs. The North America
segment, International segment and Other category incurred costs
of $11.6, $2.1 and $3.9, respectively.
During 2009, we completed specific actions announced in Q1 2009
targeted toward further modernizing our industrial system,
rebalancing our workforce to better align with our growth
opportunities and improving profitability at PolyVision. We
incurred $27.9 in restructuring costs related to completing
these actions, including $27.0 in 2009 and $0.9 in 2008, mainly
attributable to employee termination costs and lease
impairments. In 2009, the North America segment, International
segment and Other category incurred costs of $16.1, $0.3 and
$10.6, respectively.
Restructuring costs are summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Restructuring Costs
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Cost of sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.0
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
34.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Below is a summary of the charges, payments and adjustments to
the restructuring reserve balance during 2011, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Exits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce
|
|
|
|
and Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Reserve
|
|
|
Reductions
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Reserve balance as of February 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
(20.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(25.9
|
)
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance as of February 27, 2009
|
|
|
$
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.1
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
(28.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(39.9
|
)
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance as of February 26, 2010
|
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
(19.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(24.2
|
)
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance as of February 25, 2011
|
|
|
$
|
25.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The workforce reductions reserve balance as of February 25,
2011 primarily relates to the employee termination costs related
to the Q1 and Q4 2011 announcements. The adjustments to the
business exits and related costs in 2011 primarily relates to a
$10.6 gain related to the sale and partial leaseback of a
facility in Canada.
|
|
21.
|
UNAUDITED
QUARTERLY RESULTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Quarterly Results
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Total
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
541.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
599.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
672.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
622.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,437.1
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
161.5
|
|
|
|
|
170.6
|
|
|
|
|
203.9
|
|
|
|
|
181.5
|
|
|
|
|
717.5
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
545.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
578.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
616.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
551.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,291.7
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
155.5
|
|
|
|
|
165.0
|
|
|
|
|
177.5
|
|
|
|
|
151.8
|
|
|
|
|
649.8
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
|
(20.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
96
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure:
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures:
|
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management,
under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act, as amended), as of February 25,
2011. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of February 25,
2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in
(1) recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a
timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and
(2) ensuring that information required to be disclosed by
us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
(b) Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, we have included a report of managements
assessment of the design and effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as part of this Report. The
independent registered public accounting firm of
Deloitte & Touche LLP also attested to, and reported
on, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting. Managements report and the independent
registered public accounting firms attestation report are
included in this Report in Item 8: Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data under the captions entitled
Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting and Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm.
(c) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were
no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during our fourth fiscal quarter that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information:
|
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance:
|
Certain information regarding executive officers required by
this Item is set forth as a Supplementary Item at the end of
Part I of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Other information required by this item is contained in
Item 1: Business under the caption
Available Information or in our 2011 Proxy
Statement under the captions Proposal 1Election
of Directors, Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance, Other Corporate
Governance Matters and Committees of the Board of
Directors and is incorporated into this Report by
reference.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation:
|
The information required by Item 11 is contained in our
2011 Proxy Statement, under the captions Committees of the
Board of Directors, Compensation Committee
Report, Compensation Discussion and Analysis,
Executive Compensation, Retirement Programs and Other
Arrangements and Director Compensation, and is
incorporated into this Report by reference.
97
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters:
|
The information required by Item 12 that is not listed
below is contained in our 2011 Proxy Statement, under the
caption Stock Ownership of Management and Certain
Beneficial Owners, and is incorporated into this Report by
reference.
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation
plans as of February 25, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
future issuance under
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equity compensation
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities to
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
|
|
plans
|
|
|
|
|
be issued upon exercise
|
|
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
|
|
(excluding securities
|
|
|
|
|
of outstanding options,
|
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
|
reflected in the
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
|
|
warrants and rights
|
|
|
|
second column)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
6,672,797
|
(1)
|
|
|
$
|
13.91
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
11,218,065
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
6,672,797
|
|
|
|
|
13.91
|
|
|
|
|
11,218,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This amount includes the maximum number of shares that may be
issued under outstanding performance share and performance unit;
however, the actual number of shares which may be issued will be
determined based on the satisfaction of certain criteria, and
therefore may be significantly lower. |
|
(2) |
|
The weighted average exercise price relates to stock options,
and excludes performance shares, performance units and
restricted stock units, as there is no exercise price associated
with these awards. |
All equity awards were granted under our Incentive Compensation
Plan. See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements
for additional information.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence:
|
The information required by Item 13 is contained in our
2011 Proxy Statement, under the captions Related Person
Transactions and Director Independence, and is
incorporated into this Report by reference.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services:
|
The information required by Item 14 is contained in our
2011 Proxy Statement under the caption Fees Paid to
Principal Independent Auditor and is incorporated into
this Report by reference.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules:
|
|
|
(a)
|
Financial
Statements and Schedules
|
|
|
|
1. Financial
Statements (Item 8)
|
The following consolidated financial statements of the Company
are filed as part of this Report:
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
|
|
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
February 25, 2011, February 26, 2010 and
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 25, 2011 and
February 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
for the Years Ended February 25, 2011, February 26,
2010 and February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
February 25, 2011, February 26, 2010 and
February 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
2. Financial
Statement Schedules
(S-1)
|
Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules required by
Form 10-K
have been omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information is disclosed elsewhere in this Report.
|
|
|
3. Exhibits Required
by Securities and Exchange Commission
Regulation S-K
|
See Index of Exhibits
The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a
separate section of this Report. See Item 15(a)(3) above.
|
|
(c)
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
|
The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a
separate section of this Report. See Item 15(a)(2) above.
99
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
STEELCASE INC.
Mark T. Mossing
Corporate Controller
and
Chief Accounting
Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer
and
Principal Accounting
Officer)
Date: April 25, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the
dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
|
Title
|
|
|
Date
|
/s/ James
P. Hackett
James
P. Hackett
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Director (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
April 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
C. Sylvester
David
C. Sylvester
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
April 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark
T. Mossing
Mark
T. Mossing
|
|
|
Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
April 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
P. Crawford
William
P. Crawford
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
April 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Connie
K. Duckworth
Connie
K. Duckworth
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
April 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Earl
D. Holton
Earl
D. Holton
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
April 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
W. Joos
David
W. Joos
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
April 18, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Elizabeth
Valk Long
Elizabeth
Valk Long
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
April 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
C. Pew III
Robert
C. Pew III
|
|
|
Chair of the Board of Directors, Director
|
|
|
April 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
|
Title
|
|
|
Date
|
/s/ Cathy
D. Ross
Cathy
D. Ross
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
April 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter
M. Wege II
Peter
M. Wege II
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
April 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ P.
Craig Welch, Jr.
P.
Craig Welch, Jr.
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
April 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kate
Pew Wolters
Kate
Pew Wolters
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
April 25, 2011
|
101
SCHEDULE II
STEELCASE INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Allowance for Losses on Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Balance as of beginning of period
|
|
|
$
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
29.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.8
|
|
Additions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
Charged to other accounts
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Deductions (1)
|
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
Other adjustments (2)
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of end of period
|
|
|
$
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
29.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Primarily represents excess of accounts written off over
recoveries. |
|
(2) |
|
Primarily currency translation adjustments and deconsolidations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
February 26,
|
|
|
|
February 27,
|
|
Valuation Allowance for Deferred Income Tax Assets
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Balance as of beginning of period
|
|
|
$
|
38.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
29.1
|
|
Additions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Charged to other accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions and expirations
|
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
Other adjustments (1)
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of end of period
|
|
|
$
|
34.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
38.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Primarily currency translation adjustments. |
S-1
Index of
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
Description
|
3.1
|
|
|
Second Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company (1)
|
3.2
|
|
|
Amended By-laws of Steelcase Inc., as amended March 27,
2004 (2)
|
4.1
|
|
|
Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of August 7,
2006 among Steelcase Inc. as Issuer and JP Morgan
Trust Company, National Association as Trustee (3)
|
4.2
|
|
|
Form of Global Note Representing 6.5% Senior Notes Due
2011 (4)
|
4.3
|
|
|
Officers Certificate of Steelcase establishing the terms
of the 6.5% Senior Notes Due 2011 (5)
|
4.4
|
|
|
Form of Global Note representing the 6.375% Senior Notes
due 2021 (6)
|
4.5
|
|
|
Officers Certificate of Steelcase Inc. establishing the
terms of the 6.375% Senior Notes due 2021 (7)
|
10.1
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of December 16, 2009 among
Steelcase Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative
Agent; Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent; Fifth Third
Bank, as Documentation Agent; and certain other lenders (8)
|
10.2
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Restoration Retirement Plan (9)
|
10.3
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (10)
|
10.4
|
|
|
2009-1
Amendment to the Steelcase Inc. Deferred Compensation
Plan (11)
|
10.5
|
|
|
Deferred Compensation Agreement dated January 12, 1998,
between Steelcase Inc. and James P. Hackett (12)
|
10.6
|
|
|
2009-1
Amendment to Deferred Compensation Agreement dated
January 12, 1998, between Steelcase Inc. and James P.
Hackett (13)
|
10.7
|
|
|
Deferred Compensation Agreement dated May 4, 1998, between
Steelcase Inc. and William P. Crawford (14)
|
10.8
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation
Plan (15)
|
10.9
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Executive Severance Plan (16)
|
10.10
|
|
|
2009-1
Amendment to the Steelcase Inc. Executive Severance
Plan (17)
|
10.11
|
|
|
2010-1
Amendment to the Steelcase Inc. Executive Severance
Plan (18)
|
10.12
|
|
|
2010-2
Amendment to the Steelcase Inc. Executive Severance
Plan (19)
|
10.13
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan, as
amended and restated as of March 27, 2003 (20)
|
10.14
|
|
|
2006-1
Amendment to the Steelcase Inc. Executive Supplemental
Retirement Plan (21)
|
10.15
|
|
|
2006-2
Amendment to the Steelcase Inc. Executive Supplemental
Retirement Plan (22)
|
10.16
|
|
|
2009-1
Amendment to the Steelcase Inc. Executive Supplemental
Retirement Plan (23)
|
10.17
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Management Incentive Plan, as amended and
restated as of February 24, 2007 (24)
|
10.18
|
|
|
2008-1
Amendment to the Steelcase Inc. Management Incentive
Plan (25)
|
10.19
|
|
|
2009-1
Amendment to the Steelcase Inc. Management Incentive
Plan (26)
|
10.20
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and
restated as of February 27, 2010 (27)
|
10.21
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Stock Option
Agreement for Board of Directors (28)
|
10.22
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Stock Option
Agreement for Executive Management Team (29)
|
10.23
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Stock Option
Agreement for Participants in France (30)
|
10.24
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Stock Option
Agreement for Participants in the United States (31)
|
10.25
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Stock Option
Agreement for Participants in the United Kingdom (32)
|
10.26
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Performance
Shares Agreement (FY2006) (33)
|
10.27
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Performance
Shares Agreement (FY 2009) (34)
|
E-1
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
Description
|
10.28
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Performance
Shares Agreement (FY 2006) (35)
|
10.29
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Performance
Shares Agreement (FY 2008) (36)
|
10.30
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Performance
Units Agreement (FY 2006) (37)
|
10.31
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Performance
Units Agreement (FY 2009) (38)
|
10.32
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Performance
Units Agreement (FY 2010) (39)
|
10.33
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Performance
Units Agreement (FY 2006) (40)
|
10.34
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Performance
Units Agreement (FY 2008) (41)
|
10.35
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Performance
Units Agreement (FY 2011) (42)
|
10.36
|
|
|
Steelcase Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Restricted
Stock Units Agreement (FY 2009) (43)
|
10.37
|
|
|
Summary of Steelcase Benefit Plan for Outside Directors (44)
|
10.38
|
|
|
Summary of Compensation for the Board of Directors for Steelcase
Inc. (45)
|
10.39
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Steelcase Inc. and James G.
Mitchell dated January 20, 2003 (46)
|
10.40
|
|
|
Amendment dated June 28, 2004 to Employment Agreement
between Steelcase Inc. and James G. Mitchell dated
January 20, 2003 (47)
|
10.41
|
|
|
Amendment dated December 16, 2009 to Employment Agreement
between Steelcase Inc. and James G. Mitchell dated
January 20, 2003 (48)
|
10.42
|
|
|
Aircraft Time-Sharing Agreement, dated December 15, 2005,
between Steelcase Inc. and James P. Hackett (49)
|
10.43
|
|
|
Aircraft Time-Sharing Agreement, dated December 15, 2005,
between Steelcase Inc. and James P. Hackett (50)
|
10.44
|
|
|
Amendment to Aircraft Time-Sharing Agreement, dated May 18,
2009, between Steelcase Inc. and James P. Hackett (51)
|
21.1
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
23.1
|
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
|
23.2
|
|
|
Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP
|
31.1
|
|
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
31.2
|
|
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
32.1
|
|
|
Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
99.1
|
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement between Steelcase Financial Services
Inc. and General Electric Capital Corporation, dated
May 24, 2002 (52)
|
99.2
|
|
|
Guaranty by Steelcase Inc., in favor of General Electric Capital
Corporation, dated May 24, 2002 (52)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Filed as the like numbered exhibit to the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(commission file number
333-41647),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(Commission) on December 5, 1997, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(2) |
|
Filed as the like numbered exhibit to the Companys
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended May 28, 2004, as filed with
the Commission on July 7, 2004 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(3) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 4.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on August 7, 2006 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
E-2
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 4.2 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on August 7, 2006 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(5) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 4.3 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on August 7, 2006 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(6) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 4.2 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on February 3, 2011
(commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(7) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 4.3 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on February 3, 2011
(commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(8) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on December 17, 2009
(commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(9) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended November 28, 2008, as filed with the
Commission on January 7, 2009 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(10) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.3 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended November 28, 2008, as filed with the
Commission on January 7, 2009 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(11) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.4 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended November 28, 2008, as filed with the
Commission on January 7, 2009 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(12) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.1 to Amendment 2 to the
Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
as filed with the Commission on January 20, 1998
(commission file number
333-41647),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(13) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.8 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended August 29, 2008, as filed with the
Commission on October 7, 2008 (commission file
number 001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(14) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.8 to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended February 27, 1998, as filed with
the Commission on May 28, 1998 (commission file
number 001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(15) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.2 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended November 28, 2008, as filed with the
Commission on January 7, 2009 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(16) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on February 9, 2007
(commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(17) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.6 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended August 29, 2008, as filed with the
Commission on October 7, 2008 (commission file
number 001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(18) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended August 28, 2009, as filed with the
Commission on October 5, 2009 (commission file
number 001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(19) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.2 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended November 27, 2009, as filed with the
Commission on January 5, 2010 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(20) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.19 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form
10-K for the
fiscal year ended February 28, 2003, as filed with the
Commission on May 16, 2003 (commission file
number 001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(21) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.33 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form
10-K for the
fiscal year ended February 25, 2005, as filed with the
Commission on May 6, 2005 (commission file
number 001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
E-3
|
|
|
(22) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.01 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended May 27, 2005, as filed with the
Commission on July 1, 2005 (commission file
number 001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(23) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.7 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended August 29, 2008, as filed with the
Commission on October 7, 2008 (commission file
number 001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(24) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on June 21, 2007 and amended
on June 22, 2007 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(25) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.4 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended May 30, 2008, as filed with the
Commission on July 9, 2008 (commission file
number 001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(26) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.4 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended August 29, 2008, as filed with the
Commission on October 7, 2008 (commission file
number 001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(27) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on June 30, 2010 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(28) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.28 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended November 26, 2004, as filed with the
Commission on January 5, 2005 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(29) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.29 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended November 26, 2004, as filed with the
Commission on January 5, 2005 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(30) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.30 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended November 26, 2004, as filed with the
Commission on January 5, 2005 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(31) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.31 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended November 26, 2004, as filed with the
Commission on January 5, 2005 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(32) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.32 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended November 26, 2004, as filed with the
Commission on January 5, 2005 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(33) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.01 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on May 25, 2005 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(34) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on April 3, 2008 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(35) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.01 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on March 22, 2005 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(36) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on May 4, 2007 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(37) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.02 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on May 25, 2005 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(38) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.2 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on April 3, 2008 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(39) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.01 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on March 31, 2009 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(40) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.02 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on March 22, 2005 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
E-4
|
|
|
(41) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.2 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on May 4, 2007 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(42) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on March 31, 2010 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(43) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.3 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on April 3, 2008 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(44) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.42 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form
10-K for the
fiscal year ended February 26, 2010, as filed with the
Commission on April 26, 2010 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(45) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on April 30, 2009 (commission
file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(46) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.26 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended August 27, 2004, as filed with the
Commission on October 6, 2004 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(47) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.27 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended August 27, 2004, as filed with the
Commission on October 6, 2004 (commission file
number 001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(48) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.3 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended November 27, 2009, as filed with the
Commission on January 5, 2010 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(49) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on January 30, 2006
(commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(50) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.2 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on January 30, 2006
(commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(51) |
|
Filed as Exhibit No. 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarterly period ended May 29, 2009, as filed with the
Commission on July 1, 2009 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(52) |
|
Filed as the like numbered exhibits to the Companys
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended May 24, 2002, as filed with
the Commission on July 8, 2002 (commission file number
001-13873),
and incorporated herein by reference. |
E-5