GOLD INVESTMENT DIGEST 1Q 2011
Filed Pursuant To Rule 433
Registration No. 333-167132
June 29, 2011
Gold Investment Digest
First quarter 2011
Overview
Golds long-term supply and demand
dynamics and several macro-economic
factors ensured gold remained a sought-after
asset in Q1 2011. Following a
consolidation in January, gold ended the
quarter on a firm footing, returning 2.4%
over the period.
Price trends
The gold price rose by 2.4% during
Q1 2011 to US$1,439.00/oz by 31 March,
on the London PM fix. However, golds
volatility continued to diminish, a testament
to its measured price appreciation. Gold
prices rose to 28-year highs in yen terms
by the end of the quarter, despite a
temporary currency spike in March in the
wake of Japans crises. In other countries,
gold returns were more modest and even
negative, as the US dollar lost ground
against multiple currencies. Read more...
Market and economic influences
Investor sentiment improved in the first
part of Q1 2011. However, continued
geopolitical unrest likely slowed the
normalisation of economic growth and
also raised the potential for a significant
slowdown. Inflation especially from
food and energy prices remains a real
concern for consumers around the world.
These two influences also focused investor
attention on golds unique attributes and
its role as a store of value. Read more...
Investment trends
Investor activity in the gold market
during Q1 2011 differed by region.
ETFs in the US and the UK experienced
net redemptions on the back of year-end
rebalancing and some profit-taking, while
continental European and Indian investors
increased allocations. Recent data shows
a resumption of net inflows in the latter
half of March and early part of April. Coin
and bar purchases remained high, while
activity in the futures and OTC markets
was buoyant. Read more...
Gold market trends
Preliminary reports for Q1 2011 indicate
healthy but mixed activity in the market,
responding in part to changes in the gold
price. Evidence suggests central banks
continued their recent trend of limited sales
and increasing purchases. In addition while
mine production increased in 2010,
recycling activity declined marginally as
economic growth in emerging markets
mitigated part of the effect of higher
prices. Read more...
Contents
Contributors
Juan Carlos Artigas
juancarlos.artigas@gold.org
Johan Palmberg
johan.palmberg@gold.org
Eily Ong
eily.ong@gold.org
Louise Street
louise.street@gold.org
Marcus Grubb
Managing Director, Investment marcus.grubb@gold.org
Price trends
The gold price continued its upward trend, rising during the first quarter of 2011 by 2.4% to
finish the quarter at US$l,439/oz, on the London PM fix (the gold price referenced in the rest of
the text will refer to the London PM fix). While golds performance seemed more modest relative to
average gains of 6.2% per quarter over the past two years, its consistency and robust growth trend
has contributed significantly to its ability to provide diversification, risk management and wealth
preservation to an investors portfolio.
On average, gold prices increased by 1.4% to
US$1,386.27/oz in Q1 2011 from US$1,366.78/oz in
Q4 2010 (Chart 1). While gold experienced a price
consolidation in the early part of the quarter,
falling as low as US$1,319.00/oz on 29 January, it
climbed to new record highs throughout March and
continues to achieve new highs in April. More
importantly, Januarys price fall of 5.6%
corresponded to not much over a one standard
deviation move for a given month. The average
monthly volatility has been 4.9% over the past ten
years.
Golds long-term supply and demand dynamics and a
number of macro-economic factors ensured gold
remained a sought-after asset. First, the US
dollar weakened against major currencies, which in
turn supported gold prices given golds negative
correlation to the dollar. Second, comments by the
Federal
Reserve that signalled an extended period of low
rates have kept anxieties about rising inflation
entrenched in the US. Third, while inflation rates
in countries such as India and China appear to
have moderated, they remain uncomfortably high,
promoting activity in the gold market as
exemplified by higher delivery volumes in the
Shanghai Gold Exchange. Fourth, unrest in Africa
and the Middle East and the natural disaster in
Japan, have drawn attention to golds quality as a
vehicle to preserve capital and provide liquidity.
While gold prices did not react as much as oil for
example, this was in part due to golds ability to
absorb economic and geopolitical shocks and remain
less volatile. Finally, central bank activity
indicates a continuation of the trend of limited
supply and potential net purchases.
Chart 1: Gold price (US$/oz), London PM fix
Source: LBMA
Gold Investment Digest | First quarter 2011
Developed markets
During Q1 2011, gold prices continued to rise
in US dollars. However, as the US dollar generally
depreciated against most major currencies, gold
prices fell by 0.8%, 1.9%, and 4.3% in Canadian
dollar, British pound and euro terms respectively,
while remaining virtually unchanged in Swiss franc
and Australian dollar terms (Table 1). The notable
exception was the Japanese yen.
A combination of factors resulted in improved
sentiment among European investors which proved
particularly supportive of the euro. Attractive
valuations, higher expected growth in some parts
of Europe, expectations of a hawkish ECB preparing
to normalise rates helped the euro gain over 7%
versus the US dollar during Q1 2011. While
sterling also benefited in this environment, its
performance was not as strong as the euro; the
pound had strengthened against the US dollar about
half as much as the euro by the end of the
quarter. The Swiss franc, which had already
appreciated substantially during 2010, continued
that trend rising by 2.2% against the US dollar.
Gold had its largest gain in Japanese yen terms,
rising by 3.7% in Q1 2011 to ¥119,192.37/oz, as
the yen weakened against the US dollar by the end
of the quarter. While the yen appreciated against
most currencies shortly after Japan was hit by the
earthquake and subsequent tsunami on its northern
shores, it experienced a pull-back towards the end
of March. It is common for Japanese investors to
bring capital back home in times of crisis; which
appears to have occurred again this time. However,
following an immediate reaction, the yen fell
against the dollar. This was partly due to G7
official interventions, interpreted as a
coordinated show of support for a weaker yen.
During the first quarter of 2011 gold
outperformed (in US dollar terms) the US Treasury
and other government bond markets and was in the
middle of the pack relative to developed-country
equity markets (Chart 2). European stocks posted
the highest returns among developed country
indices, rising 6.5% over the quarter, in part
due to currency strength, followed by the US
stock market, which climbed 5.6% during the same
period. On the other hand, the MSCI Pacific
ex-Japan increased by only 2%, while Japanese
stocks fell by 5.7% as widespread concerns over
economic growth took hold of the market.
Table 1: Gold performance developed markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
31 Mar 2011 |
|
|
2011 max |
|
|
2011 min |
|
|
QoQ |
|
|
YoY |
|
|
Vol* |
|
|
US$/oz |
|
|
1,439.00 |
|
|
|
1,447.00 |
|
|
|
1,319.00 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
GBP/oz |
|
|
895.79 |
|
|
|
897.36 |
|
|
|
822.24 |
|
|
|
-1.9 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
EUR/oz |
|
|
1,014.09 |
|
|
|
1,059.45 |
|
|
|
963.25 |
|
|
|
-4.3 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
CHF/oz |
|
|
1,317.84 |
|
|
|
1,340.61 |
|
|
|
1,242.63 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
JPY/oz |
|
|
119,192.37 |
|
|
|
119,192.37 |
|
|
|
108,165.60 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
CAD/oz |
|
|
1,395.54 |
|
|
|
1,413.00 |
|
|
|
1,314.72 |
|
|
|
-0.8 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
AUD/oz |
|
|
1,389.13 |
|
|
|
1,431.52 |
|
|
|
1,308.25 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Annualised volatility based on daily returns. |
|
Source: Bloomberg, LBMA, World Gold Council |
Chart 2: Relative price performance of selected assets in US$ in Q1 2011
Note: For comparison purposes, gold performance was computed using 5pm EST prices.
Source: Bloomberg, Barclays Capital, J.P.Morgan
02_03
Emerging markets
Gold prices rose in local currency terms in
many developing countries which tend to play an
important role in the gold market (Table 2). The
gold price went up by 4% in South Africa, on the
back of a weaker rand versus the US dollar.
However, gold performance was more measured in the
local currencies of India, China, and Turkey than
in US dollar terms, as currency appreciation in
the order of 0.8% mitigated some of the gains. For
example, gold rose by 1.6%, 1.7%, and 1.8% in
Turkish lira, Chinese yuan, and Indian rupee terms
respectively. In India, gold prices remained, on
average, above Rs20,000/g (Rs62,200/oz) during the
quarter, while the average price in China was
above CN¥290/g over the same period. On the other
hand, gold prices in Russia fell by 4.8% in local
terms as the rouble appreciated by 7% against the
US dollar in line with gains experienced by the
euro.
In US dollar terms, Golds performance was in line
with emerging market equities, as economic growth
in some of these economies witnessed deceleration
on the back of inflation-induced monetary and
fiscal tightening (Chart 2). The J.P. Morgan EMBIG
Index of external emerging market sovereign debt
posted low single-figure returns over the quarter
as geopolitical concerns increased investor
risk-aversion. The Hang Seng Index was up by 2.3%
during the quarter, while Indian stocks, as
represented by the BSE Sensex 30, fell by over
4.5% in the same period driven by high volatility,
a still elevated inflation rate, and concerns over
higher interest rates.
Table 2: Gold performance developing markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
31 Mar 2011 |
|
|
2011 max |
|
|
2011 min |
|
|
QoQ |
|
|
YoY |
|
|
Vol* |
|
|
RUB/oz |
|
|
40,889.55 |
|
|
|
42,488.10 |
|
|
|
39,051.81 |
|
|
|
-4.8 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
TRY/oz |
|
|
2,221.02 |
|
|
|
2,320.67 |
|
|
|
2,078.35 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
CNY/oz |
|
|
9,423.44 |
|
|
|
9,487.69 |
|
|
|
8,700.12 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
INR/oz |
|
|
64,161.41 |
|
|
|
64,767.72 |
|
|
|
60,364.04 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
ZAR/oz |
|
|
9,741.09 |
|
|
|
10,043.87 |
|
|
|
9,172.44 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Annualised volatility based on daily returns. |
|
Source: Bloomberg, LBMA, World Gold Council |
Commodity performance
Commodity performance was mixed
during the first quarter of 2011 (Table 3). Most
benchmark commodity indices were up during the
quarter driven by large gains in energy-related
commodities. Both agriculture and silver also
showed strong performances while a number of
industrial metal prices fell. The S&P Goldman
Sachs Commodity Index (S&P GSCI), which is
heavily energy-weighted (comprising 67% of the
index), was up by 14.8% during the quarter, while
the more diversified DJ-UBS Commodity Index (DJ-UBSCI) was up only by
4.4% over the same period.
Oil prices were driven higher by political unrest
in Africa and the Middle East, consequently
pushing gasoline prices up in many parts of the
world to levels not seen since the summer of 2008.
Brent crude had increased by 24.3% to
US$117.25/bbl by the end of the quarter, and
gasoline was above the US$3/gallon mark in the US.
Silver also had a record quarter, rising by 23.6%
in Q1 above US$35/oz by the end of the period, a
trend which has continued into April, as prices
reach multi-decade highs. Despite a steady rise in
the gold price, the recent moves in silver have
led to the gold-silver ratio falling to its lowest
level since 1983. Tin was also in high demand,
rising by 17.4% over the quarter. On the other
hand, copper, zinc, and palladium fell by 3.5%,
4.7%, and 4.8% respectively in Q1.
While gold gains were modest in comparison to
many other commodities, on an annual basis, it
continued to show consistent returns combined
with considerably lower volatility. In general,
gold tends to be only weakly correlated to other
commodities, providing further diversification
to an investors portfolio.
Table 3: Commodities returns and volatility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
QoQ |
|
|
YoY |
|
|
Vol* |
|
|
Gold London PM fix (US$/oz) |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
Silver London fix (US $/oz) |
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
116.4 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
Palladium (US $/oz) |
|
|
-4.8 |
|
|
|
59.1 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
Platinum (US $/oz) |
|
|
-0.1 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
Aluminum (US $/t) |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
Copper (US $/t) |
|
|
-3.5 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
Lead (US$/t) |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
Nickel (US $/t) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
Tin (US$/t) |
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
72.4 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
Zinc (US$/t) |
|
|
-4.7 |
|
|
|
-1.8 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
Brent crude oil (US$/bbl) |
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
S&P GS Commodity Index |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
S&P GS Agriculture Index |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
70.0 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
S&P GS Livestock Index |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
DJ-UBS Commodity Index |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
R/J CRB Commodity Index |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Annualised volatility during Q1 2011 based on daily returns. |
|
Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council |
Gold Investment Digest | First quarter 2011
Price volatility
Stock market volatility increased during Q1
2011, especially on the back of geopolitical
concerns in Africa and the Middle East, European
sovereign concerns, as well as the natural
disaster that hit Japan and its consequences.
Equity market risk by the end of the quarter, as
measured by the VIX index and depicted in Chart 3,
remained higher than levels seen at the end of
last year. Similarly, commodity volatility crept
up during the quarter.
On the other hand, despite an early
retracement in the gold price and subsequent
bounce-back later in the quarter, golds realised
volatility moved consistently lower over the
course of the quarter. The average annualised gold
volatility in Q1 2011 was only 13%, lower than the
historical trend of 15.8% over the past 20 years.
Similarly, the realised 1-month (22-day)
volatility for gold ended March at 12.9%.
Indeed, one of the distinguishing characteristics
of gold is its ability to absorb shocks and move
at a more measured pace compared not only to many
commodities but stock indices as well. Gold was,
on average, the least volatile of the commodities
that the World Gold Council monitors during Q1
2011 (Chart 4). Volatility on the S&P Goldman
Sachs Commodity Index was 18.6% during the
quarter, based on daily returns, compared to 13%
for gold. Silver had a sizeable average price
volatility of 39.9%, followed by lead, palladium
and nickel, each with average volatilities of more
than 30%. Many other commodities saw volatilities
top 25%, including crude oil, which reached 28.8%
over the quarter.
Chart 3: Annualised price volatility for gold and commodities (22-day rolling, %) versus the VIX
Index (level)
Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council
Chart 4: Annualised daily volatility during Q1 2011 for selected commodities
Source: Bloomberg, LBMA, World Gold Council
|
|
|
1 |
|
The VIX Index is a popular measure of the implied volatility and is a weighted-average
of prices for a range of options at different strike prices on the S&P500 Index. |
04_05
Investment trends
Investor activity in the gold market during Ql 2011 differed by region. Exchange traded funds
(ETFs) in the US and the UK experienced net redemptions, while demand for their European and Indian
counterparts increased. Coin and bar purchases remained high while activity in the futures and the
over-the-counter (OTC) markets dwindled in January but picked up by quarter-end.
Exchange traded funds
Collectively, the gold-backed exchange traded
funds (ETFs) that the World Gold Council monitors
experienced net outflows during Q1 2011. However,
ETFs are fully established as an integral way to
access the gold market and their holdings remain
robust; by the end of the quarter these ETFs held
a collective 2,110.3 tonnes in gold worth
US$97.6bn (Chart 5). Moreover, activity in the
different regions was not uniform. Redemptions
were the highest in the US and London, but most
other countries had positive net inflows.
SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) listed on the NYSE and
cross-listed in Mexico, Singapore, Tokyo and Hong
Kong saw net outflows of 69.5 tonnes in Q1 2011,
primarily driven by activity in January
coinciding with golds price retracement during
that month along with year-end rebalancing by investors.
ETFS Physical Gold Shares and GBS both listed in
London had net outflows of 7.6 and 8.0 tonnes
respectively. On the other hand, iShares Gold
Trust (IAU), listed on the NYSE, Julius Baer
Physical Gold and UBS Index Solutions-Gold ETF,
listed in Switzerland, had the largest inflows
adding 7.6, 6.5 and 4.8 tonnes of gold
respectively.
In India, preliminary figures for gold ETF
activity (the majority of which are currently
wholly backed by gold bullion, but can also
contain a percentage of derivative contracts)
indicate a continued positive trend. Moreover,
new gold mutual funds (which tend to be easier to
access by Indian investors) were launched during
Q1 2011; it is expected that these vehicles will
further increase access to gold ETFs by the
Indian population.
Gold Investment Digest | First quarter 2011
Chart 5: Gold ETF holdings in tonnes and the gold price (US$/oz)
Note: Gold holdings are as reported by the ETF/ETC issuers. Where data is unavailable,
holdings have been calculated using reported AUM numbers.
Source: Bloomberg, LBMA, Respective ETF/ETC providers, World Gold Council
06_07
ETF options
Activity in the ETF options market remains
robust, which continues to offer alternative
strategies for investors. The majority of the
volume in these products is still being transacted
by way of GLD options. In line with some of the
outflows experienced in the ETF market during the
quarter, GLD options volumes dropped in Q1 2011 on
a quarter-on-quarter basis. However, at an average
daily volume of 234,724 contracts during the first
quarter, trading volumes remain higher than the
daily average of 208,131 contracts during the
whole of 2010. In general, call option volumes
remained higher than put volumes during the
period. Similarly, open interest on call options
accounted for the majority of traded contracts, at
an average of 2.1 million contracts in Q1,
compared to 1.7 million put contracts. However,
open interest in call options fell further
relative to Q4 2010 than the open interest in
puts, as investors likely exercised some of those
calls as the price of gold fell in the early part
of the year.
Realised 60-day GLD volatility followed the same
pattern as gold-price volatility, falling at a
steady pace throughout the quarter to end March at
13.4%. Similarly, the 3-month ATM (at-the-money)
implied GLD volatility, fell from 20.3% at the end
of December 2010 to 15.7% by the end of March. The
spread of 3-month implied volatility over realised
volatility was almost non-existent during January
and February, however, it rose back again in March
to almost 1% suggesting that demand in the options
market for protection against physical gold
volatility had increased by the end of the
quarter.
Gold futures
COMEX total non-commercial and non-reportable
net long positions, a measure of more speculative
investment demand, fell during Q1 2011. The net
long hovered around 22.4 million ounces (698.8
tonnes) in the first quarter, below the 26.3
million-ounce average seen throughout 2010, but
above the 3-year average of 20.4 million ounces
(Chart 6). Moreover, the net long by source,
analysed as a percentage of the total open
interest, indicates that money managers remain
active in the market (Chart 7). In general, a
healthy net long level supports the view that many
investors continue to see value in the gold trade.
Over-the-counter market
The majority of gold trading takes place in
the global over-the-counter (OTC) wholesale market
for physical bullion. While OTC markets are the
deepest and most liquid markets in the world,
information about transactions is not always fully
accessible to the public as they are conducted
outside of regulated exchanges. However, evidence
suggests that trading volumes in the global gold
market is quite large; in-line with or larger than
trading of other high-quality assets such as
sovereign debt.
The London Bullion Market Association (LBMA), through surveys of its members, estimates that the daily net amount of
gold that was transferred between accounts in 2010 averaged US$22bn (based on the average 2010 gold price). However, in practice,
trading volumes between the bullion banks are significantly higher. Most banks estimate that actual daily turnover is at least three times that
amount and could be up to ten times higher. This would value global OTC trading volumes anywhere between US$67bn and US$211bn.
During the first quarter of 2011, figures from
the LBMA show that activity in the OTC market
mirrored that of ETFs and futures. Volumes rose
during the January consolidation to an 8-month
high of US$26.1bn/day before subsiding in
February as prices recovered. Assuming a
continuation of this pattern, indications from
ETF and futures markets are that OTC volumes
picked up again in March as gold prices
maintained their steady climb.
Gold Investment Digest | First quarter 2011
Chart 6: COMEX net long gold futures contracts* versus the gold price (US$/oz)
* Net long non-commercial and non-reportable contracts.
Source: Bloomberg, COMEX, World Gold Council
Chart 7: COMEX net long on non-commercial and non-reportable positions by source as a
percentage of open interest
Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council
08_09
Bars and coins
Investment activity in China remained high.
Physical delivery at the Shanghai Gold Exchange
totalled 278.5 tonnes in Q1 2011, compared to
236.6 tonnes delivered during Q4 2010. Trading
volumes remained high at 1,424.6 tonnes over the
quarter. Anecdotal evidence suggests continuing
strong demand for retail investment products and
robust gold savings in vehicles such as the
Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) gold
accumulation plan (GAP) in Beijing. Moreover, Q1
tends to be a traditionally busy period for gold
purchases as it coincides with the Chinese New
Year celebrations. Anecdotal evidence indicates
that this, along with gold outperformance
relative to other assets in China, pushed
investment demand up.
Gold investment in other parts of Asia remained at
healthy levels. In Taiwan, bar imports reached 4.2
tonnes in the first quarter. It is estimated that
80% of imported bars are used by local gold
jewellery manufacturers while the other 20% are
acquired either as physical bars by investors or
accounts held as part of the Gold Passbook of the
Bank of Taiwan (BOT) scheme.2 In fact,
turnover of the Gold Passbook reached a record in
Q1 2011, as volumes soared by 60% QoQ and 200%
YoY. In Vietnam, retail investment demand remained
constant and strong at 14 tonnes in Q1 2011
despite higher gold prices in the local currency,
as the inflation rate continued to
increase. Inflation rose to 13.9% YoY and the
Vietnamese dong was further devalued by 9% versus
the US dollar in February. The experience in
Vietnam serves to demonstrate how investors around
the world are using gold for currency and
inflation hedging against their domestic
currencies.
In India, investors witnessed a shortage of
physical supply and an increase in domestic market
premiums in January following the demand surge in
China during their New Year. However, anecdotal
evidence suggests that physical investment demand
for gold, in the form of bars and coins being sold
to be converted into jewellery during the marriage
season, was also strong.
Private investor demand for bars and coins in
Europe and North America also continued to grow
during Q1 2011, in line with activity observed in
other categories of investment demand. Investors
were attracted to gold bars and coins for multiple
reasons and purposes, including risk protection
and currency and/or inflation hedging. In the US,
investors bought 300,000 ounces (9.3 tonnes) worth
of American Eagle bullion coins, according to the
US Mint, above total coin sales in the previous
two quarters (Chart 8). Investors wishing to
purchase gold coins or small bars can find a list
of retail dealers on our website at:
http://www.gold.org/investment/why_how_and_where/
where_to_invest/.
Chart 8: American Eagle bullion sales*
* Total sales include one, half, quarter and tenth ounce coins.
Source: The United States Mint
2 The Gold Passbook, a type of gold savings account, was launched in 1997.
Gold Investment Digest | First quarter 2011
Lease rates
The implied gold lease rate is the difference between the
US dollar LIBOR rate and the equivalent duration
Gold Forward Offered Rate (GOFO), the rate at
which gold holders are willing to lend gold in
exchange for US dollars (also known as the swap
rate).
Barring a brief spike during the recent financial
crisis in 2008 and 2009 as LIBOR rates moved sharply higher
on counterparty risk concerns, gold lease rates
have remained very low since early 2003. During
the past 12 months, near-zero interest rate
policies in Western countries and lack of producer
hedging has kept lease rates down. In Q1 2011, the
3-month lease rate averaged -0.05% (Chart 9). Both
the 1- and 2-month maturities averaged negative
rates of -0.065% and -0.056% respectively. The 6-
and 12-month maturities saw average rates rise
mildly above zero at 0.04% and 0.25% respectively.
The components of the leasing rate were
relatively stable during the first quarter
although the GOFO saw a slight decline in January
through to February from 0.5% to 0.3%, congruent
with a steepening of the forward and futures
curve, as spot gold experienced a mild
consolidation in the first month of the quarter
relative to the futures price.
As the leasing process often involves the sale of
physical gold into the spot market, to provide a
riskless hedge for bullion banks, the current
environment should continue to be supportive of
the gold price.
Chart 9: Implied 3-month lease rate
Source: Bloomberg, World Gold Council
10_11
Market and economic influences
The first part of Ql 2011 was characterised by improved investor sentiment, as concerns about
the European sovereign debt crisis subsided (or were already priced in) while economic data in the
US was increasingly upbeat. However, continued unrest in Africa and the Middle East forced oil and
energy prices up which, in turn, increased the likelihood of a much longer road to normalisation of
economic growth in developed countries and the potential deceleration of some emerging economies.
Moreover, inflation especially from food prices continues to be a real concern for
investors around the world. These influences also heightened investor attention to golds
unique attributes and its role as a means to preserve wealth.
In March, a combination of earthquakes, a
tsunami, and the subsequent compromise of a
nuclear facility in northern Japan sent further
jitters to the market, pushing equity prices and
US Treasury yields down. Not surprisingly,
volatility remained high. With a likely cost of
reconstruction of between ¥16tn and ¥25tn
(excluding the cost of the nuclear crisis), the
damage caused by Japans natural disaster is
anticipated to have a long-term effect on its
economy. As the government plans to introduce an
unprecedented fiscal recovery plan to finance
reconstruction work, financial conditions can
deteriorate further and fuel concerns over the
creditworthiness of Japanese government debt.
In Europe, Portugals request for a bailout by the
European Union towards the end of the quarter,
reinforced investors fears that Europes recovery
will be fragmented, not homogeneous, and that
internal tensions are likely to have a significant
impact on the future of the EU and the euro.
Finally, commentary by Federal Reserve officials
indicating that rates are likely to stay low for
some time have kept concerns about future
inflation anchored and put pressure on the US
dollar, evident by the greenbacks performance
over the quarter.
However, golds performance during the quarter
was not all about unrest or concerns in Europe.
Economic growth in other parts of the world,
especially in developing economies has also
supported golds trajectory over the past 10
years. It is sometimes forgotten that the global
gold market is indeed the product of multiple
macro-economic variables which can have different
effects on the various components of demand. For
example, a rising real interest rate environment
could potentially shift some investment demand
away from gold due to the rising associated opportunity cost of
holding it. However, such an environment could
also be a signal of higher future inflation
itself a potential demand driver. Alternatively,
it could convey economic strength a catalyst
for both technology and jewellery demand through
increased discretionary spending. Furthermore,
given that business cycles on different
continents are rarely entirely convergent, two
regions could promote very different demand
reactions. This well-diversified demand base
provides gold with more stable demand dynamics
than many other commodities.
Gold Investment Digest | First quarter 2011
India, China and gold
Gold investors especially in regions like
North America or Europe sometimes forget the
important role India and China play in the gold
market, and the significance and prevalence that
gold has in those and many other countries. In a
previous research note entitled China gold
report: Gold in the year of the tiger, the World
Gold Council examines the connection
China has to gold and explores its role in the
future. Similarly, a recent set of research
papers commissioned by the World Gold Council
entitled India: heart of gold,3
explores the religious and economic significance
of gold in India and concludes that gold demand
in this key market will continue to grow at a
healthy pace over the next decade. In fact,
jewellery and investment demand in India and
China combined currently represent 40% of total
global demand (Chart 10).
Chart 10: Jewellery and investment demand in China and India1
|
|
|
1 |
|
Includes jewellery and total bar and coin demand only (excludes ETFs and similar, and
techology). |
|
2 |
|
Global demand includes demand for jewellery, bars, coins, ETFs and similar, and technology. |
Source: GFMS, World Gold Council
3 A preliminary presentation was made to the media at the end of March 2011.
12_13
Hedging against global food inflation
Most central banks around the world primarily
use a core measure of inflation to gauge their
rate of intervention. This core measure typically
excludes all food and energy items as they tend
to be more volatile, and while many economists
around the world consider this a sensible
practice, consumers are still subject to
purchasing power erosion if food or energy prices
are appreciating at higher rates than all other
items. In an economic environment such as the
current one in which strong economic growth
continues to elude most developed countries,
central banks around the world (and especially
the Federal Reserve with its dual mandate of
price stability and full employment) are likely
to keep an easy monetary policy supported by low
CPI inflation. These low readings are partly
driven by weak real estate markets and the fact
that still elevated levels of unemployment force
consumers to prioritise basic needs. However,
social unrest in Africa and the Middle East,
extreme weather conditions in Australia, Russia,
China and elsewhere, as well as strong demand
from emerging economies, have conspired to push
up the prices of energy and agricultural
commodities. Hence, food inflation continues to
increase even in developed economies where core
inflation otherwise remains low (Chart 11).
This trend is even more evident in regions like
Asia (Chart 12). Consumer prices are generally
rising, but food inflation is worryingly higher.
India saw multi-year record price increases for
food during 2010 and while the trend has subsided,
it remains extremely elevated at an average of
over 12% this year. In China, food prices are
relentlessly going up, with food inflation having
reached 11.7% in Q1 2011. Interestingly, earlier
this year, Chinas National Bureau of Statistics
published revised inflation statistics in which
the weight for food, among others, had been
revised down, compensated by a higher weight in
housing. This, in turn, seems to have procured a
lower CPI inflation reading than the market
anticipated.4
In general, consumers around the world have started to feel the effects
of higher commodity prices and food inflation. In
addition, following a surprise downgrade of global
inventories by the US department of Agriculture on
31 March, the price of corn has exceeded its highs
set in June 2008. Given its importance as both
food and feed for livestock in developed and
emerging markets, there is a risk that the recent
price moves serve as a catalyst for continued
rises in global food inflation. As such, gold
provides an alternative to hedge this exposure in
a way that is not easily replicated by other asset
classes.
4 Inflation Revisionism, The Economist, 15 February 2011.
Gold Investment Digest | First quarter 2011
Chart 11: Food inflation in the US, UK and Europe (% YoY)
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Eurostat, UK Office for National Statistics
Chart 12: Food inflation in India and China versus all items CPI in Asia (% YoY)
Source: China Economic Information Net, IMF, Press Information Bureau of India
14_15
Gold and commodities
Commodity allocations have become more common
among investors as a means by which portfolio
diversification can be enhanced as well as providing a
hedge against inflation or currency depreciation.
While gold is often considered by investors as part of
a larger set of commodities, its weighting in most
commodity indices is small. Within indices such as the
S&P Goldman Sachs Commodity Index or the Dow Jones-UBS
Commodity Index, for example, golds weighting
typically ranges between just 3% and 7%.
In a recent study, Gold: A commodity like no other,
World Gold Council research shows that if part of a
commodity allocation is directly assigned to gold, not
only is portfolio performance improved, but so is the
potential for loss, by decreasing so-called Value at
Risk (VaR). In 2008, an investor with an asset
allocation similar to a simple benchmark portfolio (50%
equities, 40% fixed income, 10% commodities) would have
reduced portfolio losses by between US$200,000 and
US$400,000 on a US$10mn investment by allocating 5% to
10% of the overall portfolio directly to gold and
proportionally reducing the exposure to other
commodities. Furthermore, over the past
20 years, the same investor would have increased
average annual portfolio gains by between US$100,000 to
US$200,000 by directing a similar allocation to gold
(Table 4). These findings suggest that portfolio
managers and investors who already have exposure to
commodities in their portfolio stand to benefit by
including gold as a separate strategic asset class,
without compromising long-term returns.
This performance is a direct consequence of the
dynamics of the gold market: a market where the
sources of demand and supply are diverse and
complementary; where a ready, deep and liquid global
market exists; and where gold is often viewed as an
alternative monetary asset with no default risk.
Indeed, golds physical attributes and functional
characteristics set it apart from the rest of the
commodity complex. For example, the technology and
industrial sectors account for a much larger portion
of demand for most other metals, including silver
(Table 5). Therefore, gold is less exposed to swings
in business cycles, typically exhibits lower
volatility and tends to be significantly more robust
at times of financial duress. In turn, this causes
golds correlation to other commodities and other
asset classes to be low.
Gold Investment Digest | First quarter 2011
Table 4: Performance for assets and portfolios containing various allocations to gold1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold |
|
|
MSCI |
|
|
MSCI |
|
|
BarCap |
|
|
JPM |
|
|
|
S&P |
|
Portfolio2 |
|
|
|
(US$/oz) |
|
|
US |
|
|
ex US |
|
|
US Agg |
|
|
3M Tbill |
|
|
GSCI Light |
|
|
0% gold |
|
|
5% gold |
|
|
10% gold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1991 to December 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Volatility |
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Inf. ratio |
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
|
13.23 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
5% VaR |
|
|
3.39 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
3.53 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
3.09 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
1.65 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
-36.5 |
|
|
|
-43.3 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
-37.7 |
|
|
|
-24.3 |
|
|
|
-22.3 |
|
|
|
-20.3 |
|
Volatility |
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
Inf. ratio |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
-1.05 |
|
|
|
-1.09 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
|
|
|
8.28 |
|
|
|
-1.02 |
|
|
|
-1.19 |
|
|
|
-1.15 |
|
|
|
-1.10 |
|
5% VaR |
|
|
7.96 |
|
|
|
7.88 |
|
|
|
9.27 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
|
|
|
4.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return |
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
Volatility |
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Inf. ratio |
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
10.32 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
|
5% VaR |
|
|
3.17 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
|
|
|
7.43 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Volatility |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
Inf. ratio |
|
|
2.04 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
2.22 |
|
|
|
9.13 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
5% VaR |
|
|
3.16 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
3.78 |
|
|
|
2.31 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
2.26 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Calculations are based on weekly total returns and converted to annualised return and
volatility when applicable. |
|
2 |
|
Portfolio using a 30% allocation to US equities, 20% to international equities, 39% to fixed
income, 1% to cash and various allocations to gold and commodity indices. A 0% gold allocation is
equivalent to a 10% allocation to the S&P GSLE; 5% in gold implies 5% in S&P GSLE; and a 10% gold
weight implies a 0% allocation to S&P GSLE. |
Source: Barclays Capital, J.P. Morgan, MSCI, Standard & Poors, World Gold Council
Table 5: Demand and supply by source (%) for selected metals1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand |
|
|
Supply |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment/ |
|
|
Technology/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity |
|
Jewellery |
|
|
bars and coins |
|
|
industry |
|
|
Mine production |
|
|
Recycling |
|
|
Other sources |
|
Gold |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
41 |
%2 |
|
|
10 |
%3 |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Silver |
|
|
25 |
%4 |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Copper |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Platinum |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
As of 2009 except for gold for which 2010 figures are available. |
|
2 |
|
Includes net central bank activity which accounted for 2% of gold demand in 2010. |
|
3 |
|
Primarily used in electronics and other high-end technology uses. |
|
4 |
|
Includes silverware. |
Source: GFMS, Johnson Matthey, International Copper Institute, The Silver Institute, US Geological
Survey, World Gold Council
16_17
Gold market trends
Please note that data on jewellery and industrial demand are released with a lag; the latest
data is as of Q4 2010. Data for the first quarter of 2011 will be released in mid-May 2011 and will
be published in the World Gold Council quarterly Gold Demand Trends.
Gold price performance during 2010 was the combination of strong investment activity, a recovery in jewellery demand
(especially in India) and a normalisation of gold demand in technological applications to historical levels. While mine production increased slightly in 2010, recycling
activity marginally slowed down and central banks turned net buyers for the first time in two decades. Perliminary reports for Q1 2011 indicate healthy but mixed activity in the market, with
demand responding in part to changes in the gold price.
Jewellery
Global demand for gold jewellery was up by 17% in
2010 relative to year earlier levels, reaching 2,060
tonnes. Expressed in value terms, jewellery demand
totalled US$81.1bn in 2010, 1.5 times higher than the
US$55.5bn spent on gold jewellery during 2009 (Chart
13). In other words, consumers increased their gold
jewellery spending during 2010, despite the measured
appreciation in the gold price in multiple currencies.
This is likely the product of two factors: first, a
continuation of economic growth and currency
appreciation in key countries for the gold market,
especially India, and China; and second, a higher
perception of value for gold jewellery around the
world, both as a luxury good as well as a store of
wealth.
At a country level, the Indian jewellery market was
undoubtedly the star performer during the year (Chart
14). Demand rose 69% above 2009 levels, a
year-over-year increase of 303 tonnes to a record 746
tonnes. This was a significant increase on the previous
record of 658 tonnes in 1998. In domestic value terms,
growth was all the more impressive. Consumers spent
Rs1.34tn on jewellery, double the amount spent during
the previous year. Buying has been consistently buoyant
despite rising gold prices, providing evidence that
while gold demand may have an inverse relationship to
price, growth in income and wealth among others, can
counter these effects. Furthermore, a decline in price
volatility over the past few years has lent itself to a
more orderly ascent for gold and an increasing
confidence in it. While Indians are more prolific
buyers of jewellery than investment products by our
definition, they do not draw a clear distinction
between the two as gold serves both purposes.
While the increase in jewellery demand across Greater
China of 13.6% during the year was dwarfed by that of
India, its performance was nonetheless remarkable.
Notably, China was the only market for which jewellery
demand increased in 2009 as well; as such, the
continuation of the trend confirms the importance of
the gold market for the region.
While the final data for Q1 2011 will be released in
mid-May 2011 and will appear in the World Gold
Councils Gold Demand Trends, preliminary reports on
gold demand indicate healthy activity in the market. In
India, 2011 began on a robust note as gold prices fell
in January and relative stability was supportive of
gold demand during the beginning of the auspicious
period of Makar Sankranti (from 14 January onwards). As
prices rose again in February and March, some consumers
adopted a more measured approach. However, a stronger
rupee relative to the US dollar partly mitigated the
higher prices. Interestingly, there seems to be a trend
in which many consumers book their jewellery purchases
with retailers by giving them a cash advance and
execute the purchase when they observe an attractive
entry price level. Marriage and festival buying will
still remain the cornerstone for gold demand, and the
season for that begins in mid-April, followed by
Akshaya Thrithiya in May.
In China, the traditional
peak season falls in the first quarter along with the New Year and Chinese New Year holidays. Consequently,
consumers increased their purchases of gold gifting
products, particularly in the cities. In Vietnam,
preliminary reports indicate that jewellery demand was
off to a good start in Q1 2011, rising by more than 5
tonnes relative to the previous quarter despite higher
prices. Consumers chose to acquire jewellery to avoid
the impact of potential restrictions on gold bar
trading by the Vietnamese government.
Gold Investment Digest | First quarter 2011
Chart 13: Jewellery demand in tonnes and value (US$bn)
Source: GFMS, World Gold Council
Chart 14: Tonnage growth in jewellery by country (2010 versus 2009, % change)
Source: GFMS
18_19
Technology
Full-year technology demand in 2010 recorded a solid
12.4% increase on the previous year from 373 to
420 tonnes, signalling a recovery from the
challenging economic landscape of 2008 2009.
Contributions to growth were led by the
electronics segment with a year-over-year
increase of 40.6 tonnes (+16%). The other
industrial category registered an 8.6 tonne
increase (+12% YoY), following two consecutive
annual declines. Dentistry, the third and
smallest component of technology demand, saw a
modest decline from 52.7 to 49.8 tonnes (-5.5%
YoY).
Preliminary reports on Q1 2011 activity indicate
that the positive trend of last year in
electronics demand remains quite strong. Moreover,
predictions from major semiconductor players are
bullish for 2011. While some manufacturers have
been reducing gold coating thicknesses on contacts
and connectors the second major use in
electronics to lower costs, anecdotal evidence
suggests some component failures have help limit
the practice.
Please note that data on mine production and
recycled gold are released with a lag; the
latest data is as of Q4 2010. Data for the first
quarter of 2011 will be released in mid-May
2011.
Mine production and recycled gold
Total gold supply including mine
production, recycled gold and official sector
transactions totalled 4,108 tonnes during 2010,
a modest 2% increase relative to 2009. However,
the performance from the different sources of
supply was not uniform. Mine production was up,
but recycling activity subsided from 2009 levels
and central banks turned net buyers during 2010
for the first time in 21 years (Chart 15).
Total mine production (which includes net producer
de-hedging) increased by 9% to 2,543 tonnes in
2010, from 2,332 tonnes a year earlier as a raft
of new operations either came online or ramped up
production (Chart 16). However, total mine
production was still below levels seen earlier in
this decade, despite the rise in the gold price.
While this may seem counter-intuitive at first,
rising production costs, a dearth of new
discoveries, and legislation in certain countries
has prevented miners from producing much larger
outputs.
In general, Australian production significantly
contributed to the increase in output as high
grades of ore at Newmonts Boddington mine
boosted production. Further positive
contributions came from Mexico, where Agnico
Eagle ramped up its Pinos Altos operation, and
Argentina and the US with Barricks continued
expansion of its Valadero mine and higher than
expected grades from Cortez Hills respectively.
Offsetting the impact of these developments was a
decline in production in Peru and Indonesia.
Net producer de-hedging continued to act as a
slight constraint on supply, although a sharp
decline in the levels of de-hedging (from 252
tonnes in 2009 to 116 tonnes in 2010) boosted
supply figures year-on-year by 136 tonnes. AngloGold Ashanti and other companies including OceanaGold and Norton GoldFields closed their hedge
books entirely in 2010. In total, the global hedge
book at the end of 2010 was about 125 tonnes.
While gold prices continued to trend up in 2010,
recycling activity during this period declined by
1.2% to 1,653 tonnes from 1,672 tonnes a year
earlier. This was partly driven by continued
economic growth in emerging economies, especially
in India and China which
substantially contribute to recycled gold supply.
However, recycling activity remains high on a
historical basis, especially among Western
consumers who have gradually seen a rising trend
in recycling. This, coupled with higher price
levels ensured that profit-taking on recycled gold
in Western markets was marginally higher than
year-earlier levels. Similarly, Middle Eastern and
Asian markets other than China and India witnessed
a consistent supply of recycled gold during 2010.
Gold Investment Digest | First quarter 2011
Chart 15: Technology demand by category in tonnes
Source: GFMS
Chart 16: Mine production and recycled gold supply in tonnes
Source: GFMS
20_21
The official sector
During the first quarter of 2011, activity in
the official sector appears to have followed the
same trend of limited supply or even net buying
by central banks as seen last year. From 1989 to
2007 net official sector sales averaged 400-500
tonnes per year serving as a significant source
of supply. However, in 2008, central bank sales
dropped by almost one half, and then declined
again to just 30 tonnes in 2009. Finally in 2010,
central banks became net buyers of gold (to the
tune of 87 tonnes) for the first time in 21 years
signalling the end of an era in which the
official sector had been a source of significant
supply to the gold market.
The latest data reported by the IMF suggests that
central banks remained marginal net buyers of
gold through February of 2011 as a major shift in
behaviour among central banks continues to
unfold. As a group, the official sector holds 18%
of all above ground stocks of gold. However, gold
holdings are not equally distributed among
nations. Western European and North American
central banks typically hold over 40% of their
total external reserves in gold, largely as a
legacy of the gold standard. Meanwhile,
developing country central banks have no such
historical legacy, and therefore have much
smaller gold reserves with on average 5% or less
of their total external reserves in gold. There
have been significant changes in official sector
behaviour in both groups.
First, emerging market economies that have been
experiencing rapid economic growth have been
substantial buyers of gold. The primary reason
for this has been a desire to move toward
restoring a prior balance between foreign
currencies and gold that has been eroded by the
rapid increase in their holdings of foreign
currencies, principally the US dollar. For this
group of countries, gold has also become an
increasingly attractive means of diversifying
their external reserves. As a result, emerging
market purchases of gold have made a significant
impact in reducing the quantity of gold the
official sector had been supplying to the market
each year.
In line with this trend, Russias central bank
continues to report monthly acquisitions of gold,
purchasing 8 tonnes between December and February
and raising its total holdings to 792 tonnes.
Also reporting an increase is Bolivia, which
raised its reported gold holdings from 28 tonnes
to 37 tonnes in December. Bolivias foreign
reserves have increased seven fold in the past 10
years, which reduced its gold holdings as a
percent of total reserves from 22% to 12% as
illustrated in Chart 17. While Bolivia has not
made any public comment on this increase in gold
holdings, it is very likely that Bolivia has
simply decided to restore its gold holdings
relative to its larger foreign currency reserves,
similar to other recent emerging market central
bank purchases.
The second component of this shift in behaviour is that
European central banks, holding a significant
amount of gold in their external reserves, have
had a reduced appetite for sales in the wake of
the financial crisis. Over the past decade,
several European central banks have sold gold in
order to rebalance their external reserve
portfolios. However, as the financial crisis
deepened and quickly developed into a major
sovereign debt crisis, European central banks
have shown a sharply diminished appetite for gold
sales, with sales effectively coming to a halt
over the past three years. In line with this
second trend, European central banks collectively
sold only 0.2 tonnes of gold between December and
February, demonstrating a continued lack of
interest in gold sales (Table 6).
These two significant forces have reduced the
total supply of gold to the market, and they are
likely to continue to do so as the Western
central banks remain
highly risk averse, while the central banks of
emerging market countries continue to add to
their gold holdings.
Gold Investment Digest | First quarter 2011
Chart 17: Bolivias gold reserves as % of total reserves and foreign exchange reserves
Source: IMF International Financial Statistics
Table 6: Top 30 official gold holdings as in IFS April 20111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes |
|
|
% of reserves2 |
|
1 |
|
United States |
|
|
8,133.5 |
|
|
|
74.8 |
% |
2 |
|
Germany |
|
|
3,401.0 |
|
|
|
70.8 |
% |
3 |
|
IMF |
|
|
2,814.0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
Italy |
|
|
2,451.8 |
|
|
|
69.0 |
% |
5 |
|
France |
|
|
2,435.4 |
|
|
|
65.9 |
% |
6 |
|
China |
|
|
1,054.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
7 |
|
Switzerland |
|
|
1,040.1 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
8 |
|
Russia |
|
|
792.3 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
9 |
|
Japan |
|
|
765.2 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
10 |
|
Netherlands |
|
|
612.5 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
% |
11 |
|
India |
|
|
557.7 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
12 |
|
ECB |
|
|
502.1 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
% |
13 |
|
Taiwan |
|
|
423.6 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
14 |
|
Portugal |
|
|
382.5 |
|
|
|
82.0 |
% |
15 |
|
Venezuela |
|
|
365.8 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
% |
16 |
|
Saudi Arabia |
|
|
322.9 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
17 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
310.3 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
% |
18 |
|
Lebanon |
|
|
286.8 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
% |
19 |
|
Spain |
|
|
281.6 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
% |
20 |
|
Austria |
|
|
280.0 |
|
|
|
55.4 |
% |
21 |
|
Belgium |
|
|
227.5 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
% |
22 |
|
Algeria |
|
|
173.6 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
23 |
|
Philippines |
|
|
153.6 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
24 |
|
Libya |
|
|
143.8 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
25 |
|
Singapore |
|
|
127.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
26 |
|
Sweden |
|
|
125.7 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
27 |
|
South Africa |
|
|
124.9 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
28 |
|
BIS4 |
|
|
120.0 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
29 |
|
Turkey |
|
|
116.1 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
30 |
|
Greece |
|
|
111.5 |
|
|
|
79.8 |
% |
|
|
|
1 |
|
This table was updated in April, 2011 and reports data available at that time. Data is taken
from the International Monetary Funds International Financial Statistics (IFS), April 2011
edition, and other sources where applicable. IFS data is two months in arrears, so holdings
are as of February 2011 for most countries, January 2011 or earlier for late reporters. The
table does not list all gold holders: countries which have not reported their gold holdings to
the IMF in the last six months are not included, while other countries are known to hold gold
but they do not report their holdings publicly. Where the World Gold Council knows of
movements that are not reported to the IMF, or misprints, changes have been made. The
countries showing as having 0.0 tonnes of gold report some gold but less than 0.05 tonnes to
the IMF. |
|
2 |
|
The percentage share held in gold of total foreign reserves, as calculated by the World Gold
Council. The value of gold holdings is calculated using the end of month London PM fix gold
price published daily by the LBMA. In February, the end of month gold price was US$1,402.50.
Data for the value of other reserves are taken from IFS, table Total Reserves minus Gold. |
|
3 |
|
BIS and IMF balance sheets do not allow this percentage to be calculated. In the case of any
countries, up-to-date data for other reserves are not available. |
|
4 |
|
BIS data is updated each year from the BISs annual report to reflect the Banks gold
investment assets excluding any gold held in connection with swap operations, under which the
Bank exchanges currencies for physical gold. The bank has an obligation to return the gold at
the end of the contract. |
Source: IMF, national data, World Gold Council
22_23
Key data
Table 7: Demand (cumulative Q1 2010Q4 2010)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes |
|
|
% QoQ* |
|
|
% YoY* |
|
|
Value ($bn) |
|
|
% YoY* |
|
|
Jewellery |
|
|
2,043 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
80,824 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
Identifiable investment |
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
-3 |
% |
|
|
51,412 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
of which ETFs and similar products |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
-13 |
% |
|
|
-45 |
% |
|
|
13,051 |
|
|
|
-29 |
% |
Industrial and dental |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
16,713 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Quarter-on-quarter and year-on-year % change in rolling four-quarter totals. |
Source: GFMS, World Gold Council
Table 8: Supply (cumulative Q1 2010Q4 2010)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes |
|
|
% QoQ* |
|
|
% YoY* |
|
|
Value ($bn) |
|
|
% YoY* |
|
|
Mining output |
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
104,681 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
Net producer hedging |
|
|
-121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-4,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total mine supply |
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
99,803 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
Official sales |
|
|
-98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-3,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recycled gold |
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
67,538 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Quarter-on-quarter and year-on-year % change in rolling four-quarter totals. |
Source: GFMS, World Gold Council
Table 9: Gold price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2010 |
|
|
Q3 2010 |
|
|
Q4 2010 |
|
|
Q1 2011 |
|
|
Gold (US$/oz); London PM fix
average |
|
|
1,196.74 |
|
|
|
1,226.75 |
|
|
|
1,366.78 |
|
|
|
1,386.27 |
|
% QoQ |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
% YoY |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
Source: LBMA, World Gold Council
Table 10: Volatility* (%) to end-March 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-month |
|
|
3-month |
|
|
6-month |
|
|
1-year |
|
|
Gold (US$/oz) |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Annualised daily return volatility. |
Source: LBMA, World Gold Council
Table 11: Market capitalisation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value (US$ bn) |
|
|
Above ground stocks of gold1 |
|
|
7,425.3 |
|
ETFs (as at 31 March 2011)2 |
|
|
97.6 |
|
Notional value of net long non-commercial and non-reportable positions as reported by CFTC gold futures (at 31 March 2011) |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Based on end-2010 volume and Q1 2011 average gold price. |
|
2 |
|
Data: www.exchangetradedgold.com; www.etfsecurities.com; www.ishares.com; Zurich
Kantonalbank; Finans Portföy; www.Deutsche-Boerse.com; www.juliusbaer.com. |
Source: CFTC, GFMS, LBMA, World Gold Council
Gold Investment Digest | First quarter 2011
Table 12: Performance of gold and selected assets to end-March 20111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade-weighted |
|
|
Brent crude oil |
|
|
DJ-UBS |
|
|
BarCap US |
|
|
BarCap US |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DJ/Wilshire |
|
|
|
Gold (US$/oz) |
|
|
US dollar |
|
|
(US$/bbl) |
|
|
Commodity Index |
|
|
Treasury Aggregate |
|
|
Credit Index |
|
|
S&P 500 |
|
|
MSCI World ex-US |
|
|
MSCI Europe (euro) |
|
|
NIKKEI (yen) |
|
|
Hang Seng (yuan) |
|
|
MSCI India (rupee) |
|
|
REITs Index |
|
|
1-month |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
-0.9 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
-0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
-2.0 |
% |
|
|
-3.6 |
% |
|
|
-8.2 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
3-month |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
-3.7 |
% |
|
|
26.9 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
-4.6 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
-4.6 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
6-month |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
-4.1 |
% |
|
|
44.0 |
% |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
|
|
-2.8 |
% |
|
|
-1.0 |
% |
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
-3.8 |
% |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
1-year |
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
-6.4 |
% |
|
|
44.2 |
% |
|
|
28.5 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
-12.0 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
28.5 |
% |
Volatility2 (1-year) |
|
|
15.1 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Performance computations in US$ unless otherwise noted. |
|
2 |
|
Annualised daily return volatility. |
Source: Barclays Capital, Bloomberg, IHS Global Insight, World Gold Council
Table 13: Correlation between gold and selected assets to end-March 2011*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade-weighted |
|
|
Brent crude oil |
|
|
S&P GS |
|
|
DJ-UBS |
|
|
BarCap 1-3 month |
|
|
BarCap US |
|
|
BarCap US |
|
|
BarCap US |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DJ Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DJ/Wilshire |
|
|
|
Gold (US$/oz) |
|
|
US dollar |
|
|
(US$/bbl) |
|
|
Commodity Index |
|
|
Commodity Index |
|
|
T-bills |
|
|
Treasury Aggregate |
|
|
Credit Index |
|
|
High Yield Index |
|
|
S&P 500 |
|
|
Average |
|
|
MSCI World ex US |
|
|
REITs Index |
|
|
Gold (US$/oz) |
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade-weighted US$ |
|
|
-0.44 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent crude oil (US$/bbl) |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
-0.49 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P GS Commodity Index |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
-0.59 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DJ-UBS Commodity Index |
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
-0.65 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BarCap 1-3 month T-bills |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
-0.08 |
|
|
|
-0.10 |
|
|
|
-0.15 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BarCap US Treasury Aggregate |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
-0.34 |
|
|
|
-0.35 |
|
|
|
-0.33 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BarCap US Credit Index |
|
|
-0.08 |
|
|
|
-0.22 |
|
|
|
-0.08 |
|
|
|
-0.03 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
-0.12 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BarCap US High Yield Index |
|
|
-0.06 |
|
|
|
-0.41 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
-0.30 |
|
|
|
-0.27 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P500 |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
-0.49 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
-0.23 |
|
|
|
-0.41 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DJ Industrial Average |
|
|
-0.03 |
|
|
|
-0.43 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
-0.21 |
|
|
|
-0.41 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSCI World ex US |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
-0.73 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
-0.26 |
|
|
|
-0.30 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
DJ/Wilshire REITs Index |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
-0.36 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
-0.09 |
|
|
|
-0.37 |
|
|
|
-0.02 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Correlations based on weekly returns in US$ unless otherwise noted. |
Source: Barclays Capital, Bloomberg, IHS Global Insight, World Gold Council
24_25
Disclaimers
This report is published by the World Gold
Council, 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG, United
Kingdom. Copyright © 2011. All rights reserved.
This report is the property of the World Gold
Council and is protected by U.S. and
international laws of copyright, trademark and
other intellectual property laws. This report is
provided solely for general information and
educational purposes. The information in this
report is based upon information generally
available to the public from sources believed to
be reliable. The World Gold Council does not
undertake to update or advise of changes to the
information in this report. Expressions of
opinion are those of the author and are subject
to change without notice. The information in this
report is provided as an as is basis. The World
Gold Council makes no express or implied
representation or warranty of any kind concerning
the information in this report, including,
without limitation, (i) any representation or
warranty of merchantability or fitness for a
particular purpose or use, or (ii) any
representation or warranty as to accuracy,
completeness, reliability or timeliness. Without
limiting any of the foregoing, in no event will
the World Gold Council or its affiliates be
liable for any decision made or action taken in
reliance on the information in this report and,
in any event, the World Gold Council and its
affiliates shall not be liable for any
consequential, special, punitive, incidental,
indirect or similar damages arising from, related
or connected with this report, even if notified
of the possibility of such damages.
No part of this report may be copied, reproduced,
republished, sold, distributed, transmitted,
circulated, modified, displayed or otherwise used
for any
purpose whatsoever, including, without
limitation, as a basis for preparing derivative
works, without the prior written authorisation
of the World Gold Council. To request such
authorisation, contact research@gold.org.
In no event may World Gold Council trademarks,
artwork or other proprietary elements in this
report be reproduced separately from the textual
content associated with them; use of these may be
requested from info@gold.org. This report is not,
and should not be construed as, an offer to buy
or sell, or as a solicitation of an offer to buy
or sell, gold, any gold related products or any
other products, securities or investments. This
report does not, and should not be construed as
acting to, sponsor, advocate, endorse or promote
gold, any gold related products or any other
products, securities or investments.
This report does not purport to make any
recommendations or provide any investment or
other advice with respect to the purchase, sale
or other disposition of gold, any gold related
products or any other products, securities or
investments, including, without limitation, any
advice to the effect that any gold related
transaction is appropriate for any investment
objective or financial situation of a prospective
investor. A decision to invest in gold, any gold
related products or any other products,
securities or investments should not be made in
reliance on any of the statements in this report.
Before making any investment decision,
prospective investors should seek advice from
their financial advisers, take into account their
individual financial needs and circumstances and
carefully consider the risks associated with such
investment decision.
Gold Investment Digest | First quarter 2011
World Gold Council
10 Old Bailey, London EC4M7NG
United Kingdom
E investment@gold.org
T +44 20 7826 4700
F +44 20 7826 4799
W www.gold.org
Published: April 2011
SPDR® GOLD TRUST has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus) with
the SEC for the offering to which this communication relates. Before you invest, you should
read the prospectus in that registration statement and other documents the issuer has filed
with the SEC for more complete information about the Trust and this offering. You may get
these documents for free by visiting EDGAR on the SEC Web site at www.sec.gov. Alternatively,
the Trust or any Authorized Participant will arrange to send you the prospectus if you request
it by calling toll free at 1-866-320-4053 or contacting State Street Global Markets, LLC, One
Lincoln Street, Attn: SPDR® Gold Shares, 30th Floor, Boston, MA 02111.