sbv2za
As
filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on October 7, 2005
Registration
Statement No. 333-127792
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
PRE-EFFECTIVE
AMENDMENT
NO. 1
TO
FORM SB-2
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
OLD LINE BANCSHARES, INC.
(Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
6022
|
|
20-0154352 |
|
|
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
2995 Crain Highway, Waldorf, Maryland 20601
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices and principal place of business)
|
|
|
|
|
Copies To: |
James W. Cornelsen, President and
|
|
Frank C. Bonaventure, Jr., Esquire |
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Kenneth B. Abel, Esquire |
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, |
2995 Crain Highway
|
|
A Professional Corporation |
Waldorf, Maryland 20601
|
|
120 E. Baltimore Street |
301-645-2624
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland 21202 |
|
|
410-685-1120 |
(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)
Approximate date of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date
of this Registration Statement.
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule
462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities
Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the
earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities
Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the
earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If delivery of the Prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the
following box. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed |
|
|
Proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
maximum |
|
|
maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
Title of each class of securities to |
|
|
Amount to be |
|
|
offering price per |
|
|
aggregate offering |
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
be registered |
|
|
registered |
|
|
unit |
|
|
price(1) |
|
|
registration fee |
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value |
|
|
1,725,000(1) |
|
|
$10.50 |
|
|
$18,112,500 |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount includes 225,000 shares of Common Stock that the Registrant may issue if it
increases the amount of Common Stock to be offered. |
|
(2) |
|
The registration fee of $2,131.84 was previously paid upon the initial filing of the Form SB-2 on August 23, 2005. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary
to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically
states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with
Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become
effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. WE MAY NOT SELL THESE
SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS
EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER
TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
PRELIMINARY
PROSPECTUS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED OCTOBER , 2005
1,500,000 Shares
OLD LINE BANCSHARES, INC.
Common Stock
We are a single-bank holding company currently headquartered in Waldorf, Maryland, which is
located approximately 10 miles south of Andrews Air Force Base and 25 miles southeast of
Washington, D.C. We own and operate Old Line Bank, a Maryland state-chartered bank that opened for
business in November 1989. We serve the suburban Maryland (Washington, D.C. suburbs) counties of
Prince Georges and Charles as well as the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area through four
branch offices and a loan production office.
We
are offering 1,500,000 shares of our common stock on a best efforts
basis. We have the right to increase the total
number of shares being offered in the offering by up to 225,000 shares.
Our common stock
is quoted on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market under the
symbol OLBK. On August
22, 2005, the closing sales price of our common stock was $10.50 per share.
These shares are offered by our underwriter, as our selling agent, on a best efforts basis and
subject to certain other conditions, including the right to reject any order in whole or in part.
Because the offering is being conducted on a best efforts basis, the underwriter is not required to
sell any minimum number or dollar amount of the shares and is not obligated to purchase the shares
if they are not sold to the public. Funds received by the underwriter from investors in the
offering will be deposited at, and held by, an independent escrow agent in a non-interest bearing
account pending closing. Other than approval by the underwriter,
there are no conditions to the release of funds from escrow. We anticipate that delivery of the shares will be made on or about ___2005.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. You should read the Risk Factors section
beginning on page 8 of this prospectus before buying shares of common stock.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission or other
regulatory body has approved or disapproved of the common stock or determined if this prospectus is
truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The shares of common stock offered are not deposit accounts and are not insured or guaranteed
by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting |
|
|
|
|
Offering Price |
|
Commissions(1) |
|
Proceeds to Us(2) |
Per Share |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
Total |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Payable to McKinnon & Company, Inc., our underwriter. We have agreed to indemnify the
underwriter against certain liabilities, including certain liabilities under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended. See Plan of Distribution. |
|
(2) |
|
Before deducting expenses of the offering payable by us estimated at
approximately $216,500.00.
See Use of Proceeds. |
McKinnon & Company, Inc.
The date of this prospectus is _____ __, 2005.
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights information about our company and the offering. You should read
the entire prospectus carefully, including the financial statements and notes to the financial
statements. You should also consider carefully the information set forth under the heading Risk
Factors before making any investment decision on our common stock.
All share amounts and dollar amounts per share with regard to the common stock have been
adjusted, unless otherwise indicated, to reflect Old Line Banks one for two stock exchange in June
2002, our 200% stock dividend paid on October 10, 2003 and our 20% stock dividend paid on March 24,
2005. The one for two stock exchange was completed in order to accommodate certain provisions of
Maryland law in connection with Old Line Banks conversion from a federal to a state bank charter.
The 200% stock dividend was paid to meet the listing requirements of the Nasdaq SmallCap Market.
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
We are a single-bank holding company currently headquartered in Waldorf, Maryland,
approximately 10 miles south of Andrews Air Force Base and 25 miles southeast of Washington, D.C.
We were incorporated in Maryland on April 11, 2003, and acquired all of the shares of Old Line Bank
in a statutory share exchange on September 15, 2003. Our primary asset is our banking subsidiary,
Old Line Bank.
Old Line Bank has four full service branch offices in suburban Maryland (Washington, D.C.
suburbs). Two branches are in Charles County, Maryland, including the main branch in Waldorf,
Maryland, and two branches are in Prince Georges County, Maryland.
In August 2005, Old Line Bank opened a loan production office in Prince Georges County. The
loan production office houses our new three-person team of loan officers. This team, which joined
us in August 2005 from a large southeastern regional bank, has a history of generating a high
volume of commercial, construction and commercial real estate loans in our market.
During the first half of 2006, Old Line Bank plans to open new branches in Bowie, Prince
Georges County, Maryland and Crofton, Anne Arundel County, Maryland. In January 2008, Old Line
Bank plans to open a new branch in College Park, Prince Georges County, Maryland in the same
building that houses our new team of loan officers.
In addition to owning the capital stock of Old Line Bank, we have a 50% equity investment in a
real estate investment limited liability company named Pointer Ridge Office Investment, LLC. Among
other things, Pointer Ridge was organized to construct a commercial office building at the
intersection of Pointer Ridge Road and Route 301 in Bowie, Maryland. Once completed, we intend to
lease approximately half of this building for our main office (moving our existing main office from
Waldorf, Maryland) and to operate a branch of Old Line Bank from this address. We anticipate that
we will move into this building during the first quarter of 2006.
Our main banking office and principal executive offices are located at 2995 Crain Highway,
Waldorf, Maryland 20601. Our telephone number is (301) 645-0333 or (301) 843-5552. We maintain a
website at www.oldlinebank.com. Information on the website is not incorporated by reference into
this prospectus and is not a part of this prospectus.
Performance Highlights
Since 1994, when we hired James W. Cornelsen, our President and Chief Executive Officer, we
have accomplished the following:
|
|
|
Assembled a management team consisting of commercial bankers from our local market
who each have over 20 years of banking experience; |
|
|
|
|
Reported 11 consecutive years of profitability despite the costs associated with
opening new branches; |
|
|
|
Expanded our market area within Charles County and into Prince Georges County,
Maryland, which is part of the fastest growing region in the State of Maryland, is
within the Washington standard metropolitan statistical area and borders the Washington
Beltway; |
|
|
|
|
Increased our commercial business, commercial real estate, construction, home equity
and consumer loans and attracted an increasing level of core deposits, with total
assets at year-end since 2000 increasing by 22.44%, 19.47%, 23.93% and 26.84%
respectively over the prior year and by 36.57% at June 30, 2005 compared to June 30,
2004. |
|
|
|
|
Kept our level of non-performing assets at essentially zero as of the end of each of
the last seven years; and |
|
|
|
|
Paid an increasing cash dividend in each of the last four years, including $0.10 per
share in 2004. |
To fund our growth, in June 2003, Old Line Bank conducted a public offering and raised
approximately $6.9 million of net offering proceeds. As a result, in part, of that offering, since
June 30, 2003 to June 30, 2005:
|
|
|
Assets increased by $41.4 million from $93.8 million to $135.2 million; |
|
|
|
|
Net loans increased by $40.7 million from $50.6 million to $91.3 million; |
|
|
|
|
Investment securities increased by $1.2 million from $15.7 million to $16.9 million; and |
|
|
|
|
Deposits increased by $30.1 million from $75.9 million to $106.0 million. |
Over the last two and one half years, our business model has produced strong operating
results, as follows:
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, net income grew from $337,869
to $470,262 to $816,641. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2005, net income
grew from $330,701 to $469,484. |
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004,
earnings per share diluted grew from $0.32 to $0.38. Earnings per share diluted for
the year ended December 31, 2003 was $0.28. A decline in 2003 as compared to 2002 was
anticipated due to the additional capital and additional shares from the stock
offering. |
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, book value per share grew from
$5.51 to $6.08 to $6.33. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2005, book value
grew from $6.07 to $6.49. |
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, our return on average assets
increased from 0.53% to 0.58% to 0.82%. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and
2005, our return on average assets increased from to 0.71% to 0.77%. |
Since January 1, 2002, we have had net charge-offs of $46,625. Our allowance for loan losses
to total loans was 0.95% at June 30, 2005.
Business Strategy
We engage in a general commercial banking business, making various types of loans and
accepting deposits. We market our financial services to small to medium sized businesses,
entrepreneurs, professionals, consumers and high net worth clients. Our current primary market
area is the suburban Maryland (Washington, D.C. suburbs) counties of Prince Georges and Charles.
We also target customers throughout the greater
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
3
Our principal source of revenue is interest income and fees generated by lending and investing
funds on deposit. We typically balance the loan and investment portfolio towards loans since they
earn more attractive returns and serve as a source of customer referrals.
We have based our strategic plan on the premise of enhancing stockholder value and growth
through branching and operating profits. Our short-term goals include maintaining credit quality,
creating an attractive branch network, expanding fee income, generating extensions of core banking
services and using technology to maximize stockholder value.
Branch Expansion
We believe a natural evolution of a community-focused bank like Old Line Bank is to expand the
delivery channels via the branch network. We are planning to expand in Prince Georges County and
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, and may expand in Charles County and contiguous northern and western
counties, such as Montgomery County and Howard County, Maryland.
As described above, we plan to open a new branch and move our headquarters to the Pointer
Ridge location in Bowie, Maryland during the first quarter of 2006.
In August 2004, we announced plans to open a branch in Crofton, Maryland in Anne Arundel
County, located at 1641 Route 3 North, Crofton, Maryland, approximately 10 miles north of Pointer
Ridge, the anticipated new Bowie, Maryland main office. We had planned to open that branch in the
fourth quarter of 2005 or the first quarter of 2006. However, the owner of the property
experienced engineering delays related to the construction of the facility. The owner has informed
us that he has resolved the engineering items and we anticipate the owner will receive a building
permit during the fourth quarter of 2005. We expect the branch to open in the first or second
quarter of 2006.
We plan to open a new branch in College Park (Prince Georges County), Maryland in the same
building as the loan production office that houses our new team of loan officers. Our lease
provides that we will lease the branch space in January 2008 when the existing branch of a large
southeastern regional bank moves from the space.
Expansion of Commercial, Construction and Commercial Real Estate Lending
In August 2005, we added a team of three experienced, highly skilled loan officers to our
staff. Each of these individuals has over 25 years of commercial banking experience and was
employed by a large southeastern regional bank with offices in the suburban Maryland market prior
to joining us. These individuals have worked in our market area for approximately 18 years, have
worked together as a team for over 14 years and have a history of successfully generating a high
volume of commercial, construction and commercial real estate loans. As indicated above, this team
operates from our College Park, Maryland loan production office.
We expect that the addition of these individuals will cause an increase in salary and benefit
expenses and an increase in rent expense. By the fourth quarter of 2005, we anticipate the
addition of these loan officers will cause a positive impact on loan growth and an increase in net
interest income.
Old Line Marine Division
In February 2005, we established Old Line Marine as a division of Old Line Bank to serve as a
boat loan broker and to originate loans for Old Line Bank. We hired a veteran in the marine
lending industry with over 27 years of experience to head this division, in addition to two brokers
with prior experience in the boat industry. The primary loan origination location for this
division is Annapolis, Maryland. We also service the Norfolk, Virginia market. Prior to joining
us, each of these individuals operated as brokers in these markets and was a major source of
referrals to Old Line Bank. We conduct secondary market activity in our marine division as a
broker and we earn a fee. In addition to increasing our non-interest income, we expect to
capitalize on our relationships with high net worth individuals as a result of loans we make
through this division.
4
Of the approximately $3.9 million in boat loans originated by Old Line Marine during the first
six months of 2005, we retained approximately $2.3 million in our portfolio. The average loan
originated by Old Line Marine that we retained was $195,000, with a twenty-year term and a fixed
interest rate. The average loan for which Old Line Marine served as a broker and we earned a fee
was $228,000 with an eighteen and one half year term and a fixed interest rate.
The establishment of this division increased non-interest expense by $61,345 for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 and increased non-interest revenue by $25,757 during the same period.
By the fourth quarter of 2005, we anticipate this division will have a modest, positive impact on
net income.
Other Opportunities
We use the Internet and technology to augment our growth plans. Currently, we offer our
customers image technology, telephone banking and Internet banking with on-line account access. We
will continue to evaluate cost effective ways that technology can enhance our management, products
and services.
We plan to take advantage of strategic opportunities presented to us via mergers occurring in
our marketplace. For example, we may purchase branches that other banks close or lease branch
space from other banks. We currently have no specific plans regarding acquisitions of existing
financial institutions or branches thereof.
Primary Market Area
We consider our current primary market area to consist of the suburban Maryland (Washington,
D.C. suburbs) counties of Prince Georges and Charles. The economy in our current primary market
area has focused on real estate development, high technology, retail and the government sector.
Our current corporate headquarters and two of our branch offices are located in Waldorf,
Maryland in Charles County. Just 15 miles south of the Washington Capital Beltway, Charles County
is the gateway to Southern Maryland. The northern part of Charles County is the development
district where the commercial, residential and business growth is focused. Waldorf, White Plains
and the planned community of St. Charles are located here.
A critical component of our strategic plan and future growth is Prince Georges County.
Prince Georges County wraps around the eastern boundary of Washington, D.C. and offers urban,
suburban and rural settings for employers and residents. There are several national and
international airports less than an hour away, as is Baltimore. We currently have two branch
locations in Prince Georges County. In the first quarter of 2006, we expect to move our
headquarters location from Waldorf, Maryland to the Pointer Ridge location in Bowie, Maryland in
Prince Georges County. We also plan to establish a new branch at the Pointer Ridge location. In
August 2005, we opened a loan production office in College Park, Prince Georges County. In 2008,
we intend to open a branch in the office building in which the loan production office is located.
We also plan to expand to Anne Arundel County through the opening of a branch at 1641 State
Route 3 North in Crofton. Anne Arundel County borders the Chesapeake Bay and is situated in the
high-tech corridor between Baltimore and Washington, D.C. With over 534 miles of shoreline, it
provides waterfront living to many residential communities. Annapolis, the State Capital and home
to the Naval Academy, and Baltimore/Washington International Airport (BWI), are located in Anne
Arundel County. Anne Arundel County has one of the strongest economies in the State of Maryland
and its unemployment rate is consistently below the national average.
5
THE OFFERING
|
|
|
Common Stock Offered
|
|
1,500,000 shares of common stock
(excluding up to 225,000 additional
shares that we may offer). |
|
|
|
|
Best
Efforts Offering
|
|
This is a
best efforts offering, in which the
underwriter will use its best efforts
to sell the shares of common stock we
are offering. The underwriter is not
required to sell any minimum number
or dollar amount of shares of common
stock. Our management will have broad
discretion in determining the specific timing and use of the offering
proceeds. See Risk Factors We will have broad discretion
over the use of the net proceeds of this offering and may not
allocate the proceeds in the most profitable manner. |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Outstanding
|
|
As of the date of this prospectus, we
had 2,152,360.5 shares of common
stock outstanding. Assuming the sale
of all 1,500,000 shares in the
offering (excluding up to 225,000
additional shares that we may offer),
we would have 3,652,360.5 shares of
common stock issued and outstanding.
The projected number of shares
outstanding does not include 126,820
shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of vested and unvested
outstanding options. |
|
|
|
Use of Proceeds
|
|
We intend to use the net proceeds
from the offering to provide
additional capital to Old Line Bank
to support its growth and expansion.
See Use of Proceeds. |
|
|
|
Current Ownership by Our Management
|
|
Our directors and executive officers
currently own 385,523 shares of our
common stock (excluding options), or
17.91% of our outstanding common
stock. Some of our directors and
executive officers have indicated to
us informally that they intend to
purchase additional shares of common
stock in the offering. |
|
|
|
NASDAQ SmallCap Market Symbol
|
|
OLBK |
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
You should carefully read the Risk
Factors section in this prospectus
before making any investment decision
or purchasing any shares of common
stock. |
6
SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth summary consolidated financial information for Old Line
Bancshares, Inc. We derived the information for the five years ended December 31, 2004 from our
consolidated financial statements and the financial statements of Old Line Bank (prior to 2003).
We derived the financial information for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 from our
unaudited consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, we have included all adjustments,
consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of results for
the selected financial information and other financial data presented herein. This information
should be read together with Managements Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And
Results Of Operations and our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus. Results for past periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be
expected for any future period, and results for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 are not
necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statement Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
2,199 |
|
|
$ |
1,678 |
|
|
$ |
3,727 |
|
|
$ |
2,799 |
|
|
$ |
2,291 |
|
|
$ |
1,888 |
|
|
$ |
1,825 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
2,806 |
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
1,631 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Net income |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share and Shares Outstanding
Data: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
Fully diluted net income |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
0.049 |
|
|
|
0.050 |
|
|
|
0.100 |
|
|
|
0.075 |
|
|
|
0.067 |
|
|
|
0.056 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Book value at period end |
|
$ |
6.49 |
|
|
$ |
6.07 |
|
|
$ |
6.33 |
|
|
$ |
6.08 |
|
|
$ |
5.51 |
|
|
$ |
5.20 |
|
|
$ |
4.88 |
|
Shares outstanding, period end |
|
|
2,146,060 |
|
|
|
2,131,673 |
|
|
|
2,131,673 |
|
|
|
2,108,273 |
|
|
|
1,031,873 |
|
|
|
1,031,873 |
|
|
|
1,031,873 |
|
Average shares outstanding, basic |
|
|
2,140,149 |
|
|
|
2,123,988 |
|
|
|
2,127,837 |
|
|
|
1,636,426 |
|
|
|
1,031,873 |
|
|
|
1,031,873 |
|
|
|
1,031,873 |
|
Average shares outstanding, diluted |
|
|
2,171,603 |
|
|
|
2,158,971 |
|
|
|
2,163,915 |
|
|
|
1,674,360 |
|
|
|
1,048,883 |
|
|
|
1,037,604 |
|
|
|
1,036,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
135,211 |
|
|
$ |
99,007 |
|
|
$ |
113,569 |
|
|
$ |
89,536 |
|
|
$ |
72,245 |
|
|
$ |
60,469 |
|
|
$ |
49,388 |
|
Total loans, net |
|
|
91,282 |
|
|
|
67,186 |
|
|
|
81,505 |
|
|
|
59,518 |
|
|
|
43,059 |
|
|
|
33,733 |
|
|
|
26,861 |
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
16,871 |
|
|
|
18,951 |
|
|
|
17,817 |
|
|
|
19,185 |
|
|
|
18,739 |
|
|
|
15,757 |
|
|
|
9,952 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
105,992 |
|
|
|
79,782 |
|
|
|
88,965 |
|
|
|
69,325 |
|
|
|
62,256 |
|
|
|
50,837 |
|
|
|
40,145 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
13,929 |
|
|
|
12,933 |
|
|
|
13,494 |
|
|
|
12,828 |
|
|
|
5,687 |
|
|
|
5,362 |
|
|
|
5,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets(2) |
|
|
0.77 |
% |
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
0.82 |
% |
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
0.53 |
% |
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
0.69 |
% |
Return on average equity(1)(2) |
|
|
6.94 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
|
|
6.40 |
|
|
|
6.02 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
|
Net interest margin(2) |
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to period-end loans |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
0.90 |
% |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
0.93 |
% |
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Non-performing assets to
provision for loan losses |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I risk-based capital |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
Total risk-based capital |
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
Leverage capital ratio |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Total equity to total assets |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Dividend payout ratio for period |
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
00.0 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All share amounts and dollar amounts per share with regard to the common stock have been
adjusted, unless otherwise indicated, to reflect Old Line Banks one for two stock exchange in
June 2002, our 200% stock dividend paid on October 10, 2003 and our 20% stock dividend paid on
March 24, 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operating
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures. |
7
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves risk, and you should not invest in our common stock
unless you can afford to lose some or all of your investment. You should carefully read the risks
described below, together with all of the other information included in this prospectus, before you
decide to buy any of our common stock. Our business, prospects, financial condition and results of
operations could be harmed by any of the following risks or other risks which we have not
identified or which we believe are immaterial or unlikely.
Risks Relating to Our Business
We depend on the services of key personnel. The loss of any of these personnel could disrupt our
operations and our business could suffer. Our success depends substantially on the skills and
abilities of our senior management team, including Mr. Cornelsen, our President and Chief Executive
Officer, Mr. Burnett, our Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer, and Ms. Rush our Senior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Credit Officer. They provide valuable services
to us and would be difficult to replace. Although we have entered into employment agreements with
these executives, the existence of such agreements does not assure that we will be able to retain
their services. See Management-Employment Agreements for
additional details.
Also, our growth and success and our anticipated future growth and success, in a large part, is due
and we anticipate will be due to the relationships maintained by our banking executives with our
customers. The loss of services of one or more of these executives or other key employees could
have a material adverse effect on our operations and our business could suffer. The three
experienced commercial lenders that we recently hired are not a party to any employment agreement
with us and they could terminate their employment with us at any time and for any reason.
Our growth and expansion strategy may not be successful. We intend to use the proceeds of the
offering to support further growth in the level of our assets and deposits and to add branches to
our banking network. Our ability to grow depends upon our ability to open new branches, attract
new deposits, identify loan and investment opportunities and maintain adequate capital levels. We
may also grow through acquisitions of existing financial institutions or branches thereof. There
are no guarantees that our expansion strategies will be successful.
See Use of Proceeds.
We recently hired three experienced commercial lenders from a large southeastern regional bank and
we anticipate that they will be successful in growing our loan portfolio. However, these lending
officers do not have a track record with us and we cannot guaranty that they will be successful.
We will incur additional costs associated with these individuals which will increase our
non-interest expense. Over time, we anticipate that the interest income generated by their efforts
will more than offset the additional expense, but there can be no assurance that will be the case.
Also, we may be required to make additional investments in equipment and personnel to manage the
anticipated and/or actual loan growth, which would also increase our non-interest expense.
During the first half of 2006, we intend to open a new branch in Crofton in Anne Arundel County,
Maryland and to move our main office from Waldorf, Maryland in Charles County, Maryland to Bowie,
Maryland in Prince Georges County and to open a branch in Bowie. In January 2008, we intend to
open a branch in College Park in Prince Georges County. With respect to these branches or any
other branches that we may open, we may not be able to correctly identify profitable or growing
markets for such new branches. If we were to acquire another financial institution or branch
thereof, we may not be able to integrate the institution or branch into our operations. Also, the
costs to start up new branch facilities or to acquire existing financial institutions or branches
thereof, and the additional costs to operate these facilities, will increase our non-interest
expense. It may also be difficult to adequately and profitably manage the anticipated growth from
the new branches or acquisitions and we may not be able to maintain the relatively low levels of
charge-offs and nonperforming loans that we have experienced.
If we grow too quickly and are not able to control costs and maintain asset quality, growth could
materially adversely affect our financial performance.
Our focus on commercial and real estate loans may increase the risk of credit losses. We offer a
variety of
loans including commercial business loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans, home
equity loans and
8
consumer loans, which includes luxury boat financing. We secure many of our loans
with real estate (both residential and commercial) in the Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C. We
believe our credit underwriting adequately considers the underlying collateral in the evaluation
process, however a major change in the real estate market could have an adverse effect on our
customers, which in turn could adversely impact us. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Loan Portfolio.
Our marine brokerage division may not be successful. In February 2005, we established Old Line
Marine as a division of Old Line Bank to serve as a boat loan broker and to originate loans for Old
Line Bank. The establishment of this division increased non-interest expense by $61,345 for the
six months ended June 30, 2005 and increased non-interest revenue by $25,757 during the same
period. We may not be successful in generating sufficient volume from this division to exceed the
divisions costs. Also, the investors to whom we broker loans will, among other things, evaluate
our financial performance and the underlying performance of the loans we broker. If any of the
investors to whom we broker loans terminate their relationships with us and we are not able to
enter into new relationships with other investors it could adversely affect the success of this
division. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Old Line Marine
Division.
If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings will
decrease. We maintain an allowance for loan losses that we believe is adequate for absorbing any
potential losses in our loan portfolio. Management, through a periodic review and consideration of
the loan portfolio, determines the amount of the allowance for loan losses. Although we believe
the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb probable losses in our loan portfolio, we
cannot predict such losses or that our allowance will be adequate in the future. If managements
assumptions and judgments prove to be incorrect and the allowance for loan losses is inadequate to
absorb future losses, our earnings will suffer. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Provision for Loan
Losses.
Our profitability depends on interest rates and changes in monetary policy may impact us. Our
results of operations depend to a large extent on our net interest income, which is the
difference between the interest expense incurred in connection with our interest-bearing
liabilities, such as interest on deposit accounts, and the interest income received from our
interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities. Interest rates, because they are
influenced by, among other things, expectations about future events, including the level of
economic activity, federal monetary and fiscal policy and geo-political stability, are not
predictable or controllable. In addition, competitive factors heavily influence the interest rates
we can earn on our loan and investment portfolios and the interest rates we pay on our deposits.
Community banks are often at a competitive disadvantage in managing their cost of funds compared to
the large regional, super-regional or national banks that have access to the national and
international capital markets. These factors influence our ability to maintain a stable net
interest margin.
We seek to maintain a neutral position in terms of the volume of assets and liabilities that mature
or re-price during any period so that we may reasonably predict our net interest margin; however,
interest rate fluctuations, loan prepayments, loan production and deposit flows are constantly
changing and influence our ability to maintain this neutral position. Generally speaking, our
earnings will be more sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates the greater the variance in
volume of assets and liabilities that mature and re-price in any period. The extent and duration
of the sensitivity will depend on the cumulative variance over time, the velocity and direction of
interest rates, and whether we are more asset sensitive or liability sensitive. Accordingly, we
may not be successful in maintaining this neutral position and, as a result, our net interest
margin may suffer. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Interest Rate
Sensitivity and Interest Rate Risk Management.
The market value of our investments could negatively impact stockholders equity. Approximately
86.94% of our securities investment portfolio at June 30, 2005 (and 10.85% of total assets) has
been designated as available for sale pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 115 relating to accounting for investments. SFAS 115 requires that unrealized gains and
losses in the estimated value of the available for sale portfolio be marked to market and
reflected as a separate item in stockholders equity, net of tax. As of June 30, 2005, we had
unrealized losses in our available for sale portfolio of $178,962 ($109,847 net of taxes). If the
market value of the available for sale investment portfolio declines further, it will cause a
corresponding decline in stockholders equity. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Investment
Securities.
Because Old Line Bank serves a limited market area in Maryland, an economic downturn in our market
area could more adversely affect us than it affects our larger competitors that are more
geographically diverse. Our current primary market area consists of the suburban Maryland
(Washington, D.C. suburbs) counties of Prince
Georges and Charles. We are expanding in Prince Georges County and Anne Arundel County,
Maryland, and may
9
expand in contiguous northern and western counties, such as Montgomery County and
Howard County, Maryland. However, broad geographic diversification is not currently part of our
community bank focus. As a result, if our market area suffers an economic downturn, it may more
severely affect our business and financial condition than it affects larger bank competitors. Our
larger competitors serve more geographically diverse market areas, parts of which may not be
affected by the same economic conditions that may exist in our market
area. See Business Location and Market Area.
Old Line Bank faces substantial competition which could adversely affect our growth and operating
results. Old Line Bank operates in a competitive market for financial services and faces intense
competition from other financial institutions both in making loans and in attracting deposits.
Many of these financial institutions have been in business for many years, are significantly
larger, have established customer bases, have greater financial resources and lending limits than
Old Line Bank, and are able to offer certain services that we are not able to offer.
We face limits on our ability to lend. We are limited in the amount we can lend to a single
borrower by the amount of our capital. Generally, under current law, we may lend up to 15% of our
unimpaired capital and surplus to any one borrower. As of June 30, 2005, we were able to lend
approximately $2.1 million to any one borrower. This amount is significantly less than that of
many of our competitors and may discourage potential borrowers who have credit needs in excess of
our legal lending limit from doing business with us. We generally try to accommodate larger loans
by selling participations in those loans to other financial institutions, but this strategy is not
always available. We cannot assure you that we will be able to attract or maintain customers
seeking larger loans or that we will be able to sell participations in such loans on terms we
consider favorable. We believe that the additional capital from the offering will enable us to
make larger loans, but there can be no assurance that we will be
successful in this regard. See Supervision and
Regulation Capital Adequacy Guidelines.
Our need to comply with extensive and complex governmental regulation could have an adverse effect
on our business and our growth strategy. The banking industry is subject to extensive regulation
by state and federal banking authorities. Many of these regulations are intended to protect
depositors, the public or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance funds, not
stockholders. Regulatory requirements affect our lending practices, capital structure, investment
practices, dividend policy and many other aspects of our business. These requirements may
constrain our rate of growth and changes in regulations could adversely affect us. The burden
imposed by these federal and state regulations may place banks in general, and Old Line Bank
specifically, at a competitive disadvantage compared to less regulated competitors. In addition,
the cost of compliance with regulatory requirements could adversely affect our ability to operate
profitably.
In addition, because federal regulation of financial institutions changes regularly and is the
subject of constant legislative debate, we cannot forecast how federal regulation of financial
institutions may change in the future and impact our operations. Although Congress in recent years
has sought to reduce the regulatory burden on financial institutions with respect to the approval
of specific transactions, we fully expect that the financial institution industry will remain
heavily regulated in the near future and that additional laws or regulations may be adopted further
regulating specific banking practices. See Supervision and
Regulation.
Our Stock Benefit Plans Will Increase Our Expenses, Which May Reduce Our Profitability and
Stockholders Equity. Pursuant to our compensation plans, we expect to grant additional stock
options. The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, which will apply to us beginning in 2006. SFAS
No. 123R eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and
requires such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method and the resulting cost
to be recognized in the financial statements over the option vesting periods. Recording
compensation expense in our statement of income for stock options using the fair value method could
have a significant negative effect on our reported financial results, particularly if we grant a
significant number of options in future periods. See
Management Executive Compensation.
The costs of being a public company are proportionately higher for small companies like us due to
the requirement of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules
and regulations promulgated by Securities and Exchange Commission have increased the scope,
complexity, and cost of corporate governance, reporting, and disclosure practices. These
regulations are applicable to our company. We expect to
experience increasing compliance costs, including costs related to internal controls, as a result
of the Sarbanes-Oxley
10
Act. These necessary costs are proportionately higher for a company of our
size and will affect our profitability more than that of some of our
larger competitors. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity.
The interest of our director Frank Lucente in Pointer Ridge Office
Investment, LLC (Pointer Ridge) creates potential conflicts of interest for us. Mr. Lucente, who is
the Vice Chairman of our and Old Line Banks Board of Directors, controls 25% of Pointer Ridge and controls the manager of Pointer
Ridge. We control 50% of our Pointer Ridge. Among other things, Pointer Ridge was organized to construct a commercial
office building at the intersection of Pointer Ridge Road and Route 301 in Bowie, Maryland. Once completed, we intend to lease approximately
half of this building for our main office (moving our existing main office from Waldorf, Maryland) and to
operate a branch of Old Line Bank from this address.
We anticipate that Pointer Ridge will borrow
approximately $6,000,000 for the construction of the building. We will be required to guaranty the construction of the building and will be required to guarantee the payment
of up to fifty percent (50%) of all costs and expenses incurred in completing the construction of the building, provided, in either case, that the lender
continues to advance sums under the loan. Also, entities controlled by Mr. Lucente may perform services and receive fees from Pointer Ridge.
Mr. Lucente and/or entities he controls will directly benefit from
Pointer Ridge, including as a result of our investment in Pointer Ridge, our guaranty of certain of Pointer
Ridges obligations, our leasing of approximately 50% of the building being constructed by Pointer Ridge and any fees earned by
services performed for Pointer Ridge.
Risks Related to the Offering
This is
a best efforts offering and you may be one of only a small number of
investors in the offering. As a result, we may use a
substantial percentage of the offering proceeds to pay for offering expenses and not to implement
our business plans. This is a best efforts offering with no minimum
of shares that must be sold. The underwriter will use its best
efforts to sell the common stock that we are offering and, there is no firm commitment by
the underwriter to sell any minimum dollar amount or number of shares. To the extent that the
underwriter sells significantly less than the total number of shares that we are offering through
this prospectus, you may be one of only a small number of investors in this offering, and we may
use a substantial percentage of the offering proceeds to pay for the offering expenses, and not for
the purposes identified under the caption Use of
Proceeds. Any funds received from an investor will be
available to us, regardless of the number of shares sold, and will
not be refunded to the investor. For example, if we sell only 10% of the shares that we are
offering, or 150,000 shares, at the assumed public offering price of $10.50, we would have gross
offering proceeds of $1,575,000. Under that scenario, we estimate that we would use approximately
18% of that amount to pay the underwriters commission and estimated expenses of the offering. See
Use of Proceeds.
We will have broad discretion over the use of the net proceeds of this offering and may not
allocate the proceeds in the most profitable manner. Our management will have broad discretion in
determining the specific timing and use of 100% of the offering proceeds. Until utilized, we
anticipate that we will invest the net offering proceeds in liquid assets. We have not otherwise
made a specific allocation for the use of the net proceeds. Therefore, our management will have
broad discretion as to the timing and specific application of the net proceeds, and investors will
not have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial and other relevant information that we
will use in applying the net proceeds. Although we intend to use the net proceeds to serve our
best interests, our application may not ultimately reflect the most profitable application of the
net proceeds. See Use of Proceeds.
Stock ownership by our directors and executive officers and their affiliates may allow them to
control us and block certain transactions that require stockholder approval, including transactions
in which stockholders would otherwise receive a premium for their shares. Our directors and
executive officers currently own 385,523 shares of our common stock and on a fully diluted basis
own 464,663 shares of our common stock. This represents approximately 17.91% of the outstanding
shares and 20.82% of the outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis. If these directors and
executive officers do not purchase any shares in the offering, they will own approximately 10.56%
of the shares (12.45% on a fully diluted basis) if all 1,500,000 of the shares are sold. They
would own a proportionately greater percentage if less than all of the 1,500,000 shares are sold.
We expect that at least some of our directors and executive officers will purchase shares in the
offering. Because of the percentage of stock held by our directors and executive officers, these
persons could influence the outcome of any matter submitted to a vote of our stockholders. In
particular, this group, by voting against a proposal submitted to stockholders, may be able to
block the approval of any proposal that requires the affirmative vote of 80% of the stockholders.
Those proposals include certain business combination transactions. See Description of Capital
Stock for more information about stockholder voting and other charter provisions.
There is a limited trading market for our common stock; it may be difficult to sell your shares
after you have purchased them. The Nasdaq SmallCap Market lists our common stock under the symbol
OLBK. The Nasdaq SmallCap Market has listed our common stock since December 1, 2003. The listing
has facilitated transactions between buyers and sellers, however, it cannot guarantee an active
trading market or liquidity in our common stock. Sellers of large positions of common stock may or
may not be able to execute transactions timely or at a desired price level. During the first six
months of 2005, our average daily trading volume was approximately 6,624 shares or 0.31% of the
total shares outstanding. We cannot assure you that this offering will increase the trading volume
for our stock. Even if a more active market develops, there can be no assurance that such market
will continue, or that you will be able to sell your shares at or above the offering price. You
should carefully consider the potential lack of liquidity of your investment in our common stock
when making your investment decision. See Market For Common
Stock.
There is no guarantee we will continue to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Although
we have paid cash dividends in each of the last four years, there is no guarantee that we will
continue to pay dividends. You should not buy shares in this offering if you need dividend income
from this investment. Our ability to declare and
pay dividends is dependent upon, among other things, restrictions imposed by the reserve and
capital requirements
11
of Maryland and federal law and regulations, our income and financial
condition, tax considerations, and general business conditions. Therefore, investors should not
purchase shares with a view for a current return on their investment in the form of cash dividends.
See Dividend Policy and Supervision and Regulation Old Line Bank Dividends for more
information regarding our dividend policy and the restrictions imposed on us in the payment of
dividends.
Because no governmental agency guarantees or insures our stock, you could lose your entire
investment. The shares of common stock offered in this offering are not savings accounts
or deposits, are not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any
other governmental agency, and involve investment risk, including the possible loss of your entire
investment. See Supervision and Regulation.
Our stock value may suffer from anti-takeover provisions that may impede potential takeovers.
Provisions in our corporate documents and in Maryland corporate law may make it difficult and
expensive to pursue a tender offer, change in control or takeover attempt of us. As a result, you
may not have an opportunity to participate in such a transaction, and the trading price of our
stock may not rise to the level of other institutions that are more vulnerable to hostile
takeovers. Anti-takeover provisions include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
supermajority (80%) vote required for business combination transactions with 15%
stockholders unless approved by the disinterested directors (i.e., those directors
unaffiliated with the 15% stockholder); |
|
|
|
|
the election of members of our board of directors to staggered three-year terms; |
|
|
|
|
the absence of cumulative voting by stockholders in the election of directors; |
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to issue preferred stock and additional shares of common stock without
stockholder approval; and |
|
|
|
|
|
directors may only be removed for cause. |
These provisions also will make it more difficult for an outsider to remove our current board of
directors or management. See Description of Capital Stock for a description of anti-takeover
provisions in our corporate documents and under Maryland law.
The
rights of the holder of our common stock will be subordinated if
we issue shares of preferred stock. Our charter allows our board
of directors to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock,
par value $0.01 per share, in one or more series. Prior to the
issuance, the board of directors is required to fix for each series
the designation, preferences, conversion and other rights, voting
powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends, qualifications and
terms or conditions of redemption. The board of directors could
authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock with terms and
conditions which could have the effect of subordinating the rights of
our common stockholder and discouraging a takeover or other
transaction which some of our stockholders might believe to be in
their best interests or in which they might receive a premium for
their shares of common stock over the market price of such shares. As
of the date hereof, we have no present plans to issue any preferred
stock.
Our
Stock-based Benefit Plans May Dilute Your Ownership Interest. We
have adopted and our shareholders have approved stock option plans
and an equity incentive plan, and we have issued, and intend to issue
in the future options to our officers, directors and employees
pursuant to these plans. In total, as of June 30, 2005, we may issue 365,500 shares of
common stock and options to purchase common stock under these plans.
If we sell 10%, 50% or 100% of the shares being offered (without
regard of the additional 225,000 shares that we may sell), your
ownership percentage would decrease by approximately 0.90%, 2.90% and
3.75% if all of the 365,500 shares were issued pursuant to these
plans.
You will experience immediate dilution in net tangible book value per share from the offering
price. In general, our current stockholders acquired their common stock at a cost below the price
at which we will offer the common stock in the offering, and we have issued options to purchase
shares of common stock with an exercise price below the price at which we will offer the common
stock in the offering. Furthermore, the offering price of the common stock in the offering will be
higher than the current book value per share of the common stock. Consequently, investors in the
offering will experience dilution in their investment. See Dilution for more information about
the dilution to investors in the offering.
12
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the matters discussed under the captions Prospectus Summary, Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Business
of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and Old Line Bank, and elsewhere in this prospectus include
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding
profitability, liquidity, allowance for loan losses, interest rate sensitivity, market risk and
financial and other goals. Forward-looking statements often use words such as believe, expect,
plan, may, will, should, project, contemplate, anticipate, forecast, intend or
other words of similar meaning. You can also identify them by the fact that they do not relate
strictly to historical or current facts. The forward-looking statements we use in this prospectus
are subject to significant risks, assumptions and uncertainties, including among other things, the
following important factors that could affect the actual outcome of future events:
|
|
|
Loss of key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in market rates of interest and loan and deposit pricing, which could
negatively affect our net interest margin, asset valuation and income and expense
projections; |
|
|
|
|
Adverse changes in the overall national economy as well as adverse economic
conditions in our market areas; |
|
|
|
|
Competitive factors within the financial services industry; |
|
|
|
|
Changes in regulatory requirements and/or restrictive banking legislation; and |
|
|
|
|
Other factors described in the Risk Factors section of this prospectus. |
Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual results and performance may be materially
different from results indicated by these forward-looking statements. You should not put undue
reliance on any forward-looking statements.
All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are
expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth in this prospectus.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation
to update publicly any of these statements in light of new information or future events.
13
USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table reflects the anticipated allocation of the net proceeds of the offering at
an assumed public offering price of $10.50 per share, after deducting estimated expenses. Because
this is a best efforts offering and there is no minimum number of
shares that must be sold, any funds received from an investor will be
available to us regardless of the number of shares sold, and will not
be refunded to the investor. We are
presenting this information assuming that we sell 10%, 50% and 100% of the shares of common stock
that we are offering. Our management will have broad discretion in
determining the specific timing and use of proceeds. The table below does not reflect the sale of any of the additional 225,000
shares that we may offer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% |
|
50% |
|
100% |
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent of Net Proceeds |
|
Amount |
|
Percent of Net Proceeds |
|
Amount |
|
Percent of Net Proceeds |
Gross offering proceeds |
|
$ |
1,575,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,875,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
Estimated underwriters commission(1) |
|
|
78,750 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
393,750 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
787,500 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Estimated
offering expenses excluding underwriters commissions(2) |
|
|
202,500 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
208,500 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
216,000 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net offering
proceeds |
|
$ |
1,293,750 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
7,272,750 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
14,746,500 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of net proceeds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Old Line Bank |
|
$ |
1,293,750 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
7,272,750 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
14,746,500 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) 5%
of the gross proceeds. See Plan of Distribution for additional
details.
(2) This
amount includes filing fees, printer fees and fees incurred by us for
legal and accounting services.
We intend to invest all of the net offering proceeds in Old Line Bank. The net proceeds will:
|
|
|
provide Old Line Bank with additional capital to support its banking, lending and/or
investment activities, and |
|
|
|
|
support the expansion of Old Line Banks operations through the establishment of
additional branch offices. |
We have not made a specific allocation for the use of the net proceeds. Until utilized, we
anticipate that we will invest the net offering proceeds in liquid assets. See Risk Factors We
will have broad discretion over the use of the net proceeds of this offering and may not allocate
the proceeds in the most profitable manner.
14
MARKET FOR COMMON STOCK
On November 13, 2003, Nasdaq approved our application to list our securities on the Nasdaq
SmallCap Market under the symbol OLBK with listing to occur on December 1, 2003. Prior to the
establishment of the holding company structure, Old Line Banks common stock was quoted for trading
on the OTC Bulletin Board operated by the National Association of Securities Dealers under the
symbol OLBK. From September 15, 2003 until November 30, 2003, our common stock was quoted for
trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol OLBC. Prior to listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap
Market, our or Old Line Banks common stock traded only sporadically.
The following table reflects the high and low sales information as reported on the OTC
Bulletin Board through December 1, 2003. Subsequent to December 1, 2003, the table shows the high
and low sales information as reported on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. The quotations reflect
inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commission, and may not represent actual
transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale Price Range |
|
|
High |
|
Low |
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
5.42 |
|
|
$ |
4.83 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
7.57 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
8.48 |
|
|
|
7.63 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
9.67 |
|
|
|
8.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
$ |
9.03 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
9.88 |
|
|
|
7.55 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
9.58 |
|
|
|
7.88 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
10.46 |
|
|
|
9.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
12.50 |
|
|
|
9.79 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
11.00 |
|
|
|
8.90 |
|
Third
Quarter (through August 22, 2005) |
|
|
10.75 |
|
|
|
9.60 |
|
The closing
price for our common stock on August 22, 2005 as reported on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market
was $10.50.
As of August 1, 2005, we had 2,152,360.5 shares of common stock issued and outstanding held by
approximately 298 stockholders of record. There were 126,820 shares of common stock issuable on
the exercise of outstanding stock options, 88,740 of which were exercisable. There were 6,240
options that are exercisable in 2005, 12,640 exercisable in 2006 and 6,400 exercisable in each of
2007, 2008 and 2009.
DIVIDEND POLICY
In February 2003, Old Line Bank paid a dividend of $0.075 per share. In March, June,
September and December of 2004 and March of 2005, we paid a dividend of $0.025 per share and in
June 2005, we paid a dividend of $0.024 per share.
Our ability to pay dividends in the future will depend on the ability of Old Line Bank to pay
dividends to us. Old Line Banks ability to continue paying dividends will depend on Old Line
Banks compliance with certain dividend regulations imposed upon it by bank regulatory authorities.
See Supervision and Regulation Old Line Bank Dividends. In addition, we will consider a
number of other factors, including our income and financial condition, tax considerations, general
business conditions and other factors before deciding to pay additional dividends in the future.
There can be no assurance that we will continue to pay dividends to our stockholders.
15
CAPITALIZATION
The following table presents our consolidated capitalization as of June 30, 2005. You should
read this information together with our financial statements and related notes, which are included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2005 |
Indebtedness: |
|
|
|
|
Long term debt (1) |
|
$ |
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness |
|
$ |
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 5,000,000 shares
authorized; 2,146,060.5 shares issued and outstanding
(2) |
|
$ |
21,461 |
|
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share; 1,000,000
shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
0 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
12,532,415 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,485,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
(109,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
13,929,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity and long term debt |
|
$ |
19,929,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk based capital ratio |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
Total risk based capital ratio |
|
|
14.5 |
|
Leverage ratio(3) |
|
|
11.1 |
|
Equity to assets ratio |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances maturing more than one year from June 30, 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
Does not include 99,120 shares of common stock reserved for issuance as of June 30,
2005 upon exercise of outstanding options. Such options have exercise prices ranging from
$3.33 to $9.83 per share. 86,640 of the options were exercisable at June 30, 2005. |
|
(3) |
|
The leverage ratio is Tier 1 capital divided by average assets. |
16
DILUTION
Net tangible book value per share represents the amount of stockholders equity, less
intangible assets, divided by the number of shares of common stock that are outstanding. On June
30, 2005, our net tangible book value was $13.9 million or $6.49 per share of common stock.
Dilution per share to new investors in this offering represents the difference between the amount
per share that these investors pay and the pro forma net tangible book value per share of common
stock immediately after completion of the offering.
Assuming the sale of all 1,500,000 shares of common stock in the offering at an assumed
offering price of $10.50 per share, and after giving effect to the estimated offering expenses, at
June 30, 2005, our adjusted net tangible book value would be $28.7 million or $7.86 per share. The
dilution to the new investors would be $2.64 per share or approximately 25.14% less than the price
per share paid in the offering.
The following table illustrates the dilution to new investors assuming that we sell 10%, 50%
and 100% of the common stock being offered. This is a best efforts offering and there is no minimum
number of shares that we must sell. The tables below do not take into account the sale of any of
the additional 225,000 shares that we may offer.
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of 10% of Offering (150,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per share at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
6.49 |
|
Increase (decrease) attributable to investors in the offering |
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma net tangible book value per share after offering |
|
$ |
6.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering price per share |
|
$ |
10.50 |
|
Dilution per share to new investors |
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution as a percentage of offering price |
|
|
36.86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of 50% of Offering (750,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per share at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
6.49 |
|
Increase (decrease) attributable to investors in the offering |
|
|
.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma net tangible book value per share after offering |
|
$ |
7.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering price per share |
|
$ |
10.50 |
|
Dilution per share to new investors |
|
|
3.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution as a percentage of offering price |
|
|
30.29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of 100% of Offering (1,500,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per share at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
6.49 |
|
Increase (decrease) attributable to investors in the offering |
|
|
1.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma net tangible book value per share after offering |
|
$ |
7.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offering price per share |
|
$ |
10.50 |
|
Dilution per share to new investors |
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution as a percentage of offering price |
|
|
25.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
17
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial information for Old Line
Bancshares, Inc. We derived the information for the five years ended December 31, 2004 from our
consolidated financial statements and the financial statements of Old Line Bank (prior to 2003). We
derived the financial information for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 from our
unaudited consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, we have included all adjustments,
consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of results for
the selected financial information and other financial data presented herein. This information
should be read together with Managements Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And
Results Of Operations and our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus. Results for past periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be
expected for any future period, and results for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 are not
necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
Income Statement Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
2,199 |
|
|
$ |
1,678 |
|
|
$ |
3,727 |
|
|
$ |
2,799 |
|
|
$ |
2,291 |
|
|
$ |
1,888 |
|
|
$ |
1,825 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
2,806 |
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
1,631 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Net income |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share and Shares Outstanding
Data: (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
Fully diluted net income |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
0.049 |
|
|
|
0.050 |
|
|
|
0.100 |
|
|
|
0.075 |
|
|
|
0.067 |
|
|
|
0.056 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Book value at period end |
|
$ |
6.49 |
|
|
$ |
6.07 |
|
|
$ |
6.33 |
|
|
$ |
6.08 |
|
|
$ |
5.51 |
|
|
$ |
5.20 |
|
|
$ |
4.88 |
|
Shares outstanding, period end |
|
|
2,146,060 |
|
|
|
2,131,673 |
|
|
|
2,131,673 |
|
|
|
2,108,273 |
|
|
|
1,031,873 |
|
|
|
1,031,873 |
|
|
|
1,031,873 |
|
Average shares outstanding, basic |
|
|
2,140,149 |
|
|
|
2,123,988 |
|
|
|
2,127,837 |
|
|
|
1,636,426 |
|
|
|
1,031,873 |
|
|
|
1,031,873 |
|
|
|
1,031,873 |
|
Average shares outstanding, diluted |
|
|
2,171,603 |
|
|
|
2,158,971 |
|
|
|
2,163,915 |
|
|
|
1,674,360 |
|
|
|
1,048,883 |
|
|
|
1,037,604 |
|
|
|
1,036,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
135,211 |
|
|
$ |
99,007 |
|
|
$ |
113,569 |
|
|
$ |
89,536 |
|
|
$ |
72,245 |
|
|
$ |
60,469 |
|
|
$ |
49,388 |
|
Total loans, net |
|
|
91,282 |
|
|
|
67,186 |
|
|
|
81,505 |
|
|
|
59,518 |
|
|
|
43,059 |
|
|
|
33,733 |
|
|
|
26,861 |
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
16,871 |
|
|
|
18,951 |
|
|
|
17,817 |
|
|
|
19,185 |
|
|
|
18,739 |
|
|
|
15,757 |
|
|
|
9,952 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
105,992 |
|
|
|
79,782 |
|
|
|
88,965 |
|
|
|
69,325 |
|
|
|
62,256 |
|
|
|
50,837 |
|
|
|
40,145 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
13,929 |
|
|
|
12,933 |
|
|
|
13,494 |
|
|
|
12,828 |
|
|
|
5,687 |
|
|
|
5,362 |
|
|
|
5,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets (2) |
|
|
0.77 |
% |
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
0.82 |
% |
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
0.53 |
% |
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
0.69 |
% |
Return on average equity (1)(2) |
|
|
6.94 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
|
|
6.40 |
|
|
|
6.02 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
|
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to period-end loans |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
0.90 |
% |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
0.93 |
% |
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Non-performing assets to
provision for loan losses |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I risk-based capital |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
Total risk-based capital |
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
Leverage capital ratio |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Total equity to total assets |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Dividend payout ratio for period |
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
00.0 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All share amounts and dollar amounts per share with regard to the common stock have
been adjusted, unless otherwise indicated, to reflect Old Line Banks one for two stock
exchange in June 2002, our 200% stock dividend paid on October 10, 2003 and our 20% stock
dividend paid on March 24, 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operating Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures. |
18
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion is intended to assist readers in understanding and evaluating
our financial condition and results of operations. You should read this review in conjunction with
our financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
All share amounts and dollar amounts per share with regard to the common stock have been
adjusted, unless otherwise indicated, to reflect Old Line Banks one for two stock exchange in June
2002, our 200% stock dividend paid on October 10, 2003 and our 20% stock dividend paid on March 24,
2005.
Summary of Recent Performance and Other Activities
We continue to make progress towards accomplishing our 2005 goals. During the year, we plan to
improve earnings by:
|
|
|
Increasing interest revenue through continued growth. |
|
|
|
|
Reducing interest expense by growing core deposits and non-interest bearing deposits
with increased business development and promotional campaigns. |
|
|
|
|
Increasing non-interest revenue by establishing a boat loan origination division that
provides boat loan brokerage services for a fee. |
Because of our continued and we believe successful business development efforts, Old Line Bank
continues to achieve name recognition in the markets in which we operate and experienced a 12.00%
growth in net loans and a 19.14% growth in deposits during the six months ended June 30, 2005
compared to December 31, 2004. This loan and deposit growth has allowed us to improve Old Line
Bancshares net interest income while maintaining asset quality. At June 30, 2005, we had no loans
past due more than 90 days. We maintained an allowance for loan losses to period end gross loans of
0.95% at June 30, 2005 compared to 0.91% at December 31, 2004. We have accomplished this growth
while preserving leverage and capital standards that exceed regulatory requirements.
The following outlines the highlights of our financial performance for the six month period
ended June 30, 2005 compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands ) |
Net income |
|
$ |
469 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
|
41.69 |
% |
Interest revenue |
|
|
3,080 |
|
|
|
2,241 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
37.44 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
56.38 |
|
Net interest income
after provision for loan losses |
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
1,588 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
30.60 |
|
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(3.31 |
) |
Non-interest expense |
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
19.27 |
|
Average interest earning assets |
|
|
116,125 |
|
|
|
87,634 |
|
|
|
28,491 |
|
|
|
32.51 |
|
Average gross loans |
|
|
84,548 |
|
|
|
63,854 |
|
|
|
20,694 |
|
|
|
32.41 |
|
Average interest bearing deposits |
|
|
71,381 |
|
|
|
54,888 |
|
|
|
16,493 |
|
|
|
30.05 |
|
Average non interest bearing deposits |
|
|
26,499 |
|
|
|
19,668 |
|
|
|
6,831 |
|
|
|
34.73 |
|
Interest Margin (1) |
|
|
3.88 |
% |
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
|
(0.06 |
)% |
|
|
(1.52 |
) |
Return on average equity (1) |
|
|
6.94 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
|
|
|
1.69 |
|
|
|
32.19 |
|
Earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
37.50 |
|
Earnings per share diluted |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
46.67 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures |
19
In June 2005, we remitted a one time premium payment of $3.3 million to a broker for an
insurance company for the purchase of Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) on the lives of our
executive officers Messrs. Cornelsen and Burnett and Ms. Rush. We have submitted applications for
the BOLI and the executive officers have completed their physicals required for the insurance. By
November 1, 2005, we will enter into supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) agreements with
the executives. The SERP agreements will provide for future benefits to the executives. We will
also enter into separate agreements that will provide that upon the death of the executive, Old
Line Bank will split the insurance proceeds in excess of cash surrender value evenly between Old
Line Bank and the executive officers designated beneficiary. We anticipate these transactions will
have a modest positive impact on non-interest income and net income.
Growth Strategy
We have based our strategic plan on the premise of enhancing stockholder value and growth
through branching and operating profits. Our short-term goals include maintaining credit quality,
creating an attractive branch network, expanding fee income, generating extensions of core banking
services and using technology to maximize stockholder value.
Expansion
We believe a natural evolution of a community-focused bank like Old Line Bank is to expand the
delivery channels via the branch network. We are planning to expand in Prince Georges County and
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, and may expand in Charles County and contiguous northern and western
counties, such as Montgomery County and Howard County, Maryland.
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. owns a 50% equity investment in a real estate investment limited
liability company named Pointer Ridge Office Investment, LLC. Frank Lucente, a director of Old Line
Bancshares, Inc. and Old Line Bank, controls twenty five percent of Pointer Ridge and controls the
manager of Pointer Ridge. Among other things, Pointer Ridge was organized to construct a commercial
office building at the intersection of Pointer Ridge Road and Route 301 in Bowie, Maryland. Once
completed, we intend to lease approximately half of this building for our main office (moving our
existing main office from Waldorf, Maryland) and to operate a branch of Old Line Bank from this
address.
In
April 2005, Pointer Ridge executed a contract with Waverly
Construction Inc. (Waverly), an unrelated party, to
begin construction of an approximately 40,000 square foot commercial office building at the
property. The contract sum is four million one hundred eight thousand dollars ($4,108,000). The
contract stipulates that Waverly will begin work within seven calendar days of the receipt of (1)
notice to proceed from Pointer Ridge; (2) grading permit; (3) building permit; (4) fully executed
contract; and (5) written verification from Pointer Ridge of funding for the project being in
place. Waverly has received notice to proceed and a fully executed contract from Pointer Ridge, and
a grading and building permit from Prince Georges County.
Although Waverly had not received
written verification from Pointer Ridge that funding for the project
was in place, Waverly began
construction of the project in May 2005 and the building is partially
completed.
Pointer
Ridge is currently in negotiations with an unrelated bank to obtain
funding for construction and permanent financing on the building. We
anticipate that the loan amount will be approximately $6,000,000 and
will contain market terms. Old Line Bancshares, Inc. will
be required to guaranty the construction of the building, and will be
required to guarantee the payment of up to fifty percent (50%) of all
costs and expenses incurred in completing the construction of the
building, provided, in either case, that the lender continues to advance sums under the loan. We anticipate that the construction financing will be in
place by October 20, 2005. Prior to completion of construction
of the building, Pointer Ridge may require additional capital
contributions from its members. We anticipate moving to our new
headquarters in the first quarter of 2006.
In August 2004, we announced plans to open a branch in Crofton, Maryland in Anne Arundel
County, located at 1641 Route 3 North, Crofton, Maryland, approximately 10 miles north of Pointer
Ridge, the anticipated new Bowie, Maryland main office. We had planned to open that branch in the
fourth quarter of 2005 or the first quarter of 2006. However, the owner of the property experienced
engineering delays related to the construction of the facility. The owner has informed us that he
has resolved the engineering items and we anticipate the owner will receive a building permit
during the fourth quarter of 2005. We expect the branch to open in the first or second quarter of
2006.
We plan to open a new branch in College Park (Prince Georges County), Maryland in the same
building as the loan production office that houses our new team of loan officers (see - Expansion
of Commercial, Construction
20
and Commercial Real Estate Lending below). Our lease provides that we will lease the branch space
in January 2008 when the existing branch of a large southeastern regional bank moves from the
space.
Because of the new branches, we anticipate salaries and benefits expenses and other operating
expenses will increase through 2008. We anticipate that, over time, income generated from the
branches will offset any increase in expenses.
Expansion of Commercial, Construction and Commercial Real Estate Lending
In August 2005, we added a team of three experienced, highly skilled loan officers to our
staff. Each of these individuals has over 25 years of commercial banking experience and was
employed by a large southeastern regional bank with offices in the suburban Maryland market prior
to joining us. These individuals have worked in our market area for approximately 18 years, have
worked together as a team for
over 14 years and have a history of successfully generating a high volume of commercial,
construction and commercial real estate loans. This team operates from our College Park, Maryland
loan production office.
We expect that the addition of these individuals will cause an increase in salary and benefit
expenses and an increase in rent expense. By the fourth quarter of 2005, we anticipate the addition
of these loan officers will cause a positive impact on loan growth and an increase in net interest
income. The additional capital from the offering should allow us to leverage our balance sheet to
support the anticipated loan growth as a result of these new hires.
Old Line Marine Division
In February 2005, we established Old Line Marine as a division of Old Line Bank to serve as a
boat loan broker and to originate loans for Old Line Bank. We hired a veteran in the marine lending
industry with over 27 years of experience to head this division, in addition to two brokers with
prior experience in the boat industry. The primary loan origination location for this division is
Annapolis, Maryland. We also service the Norfolk, Virginia market. Prior to joining us, each of
these individuals operated as brokers in these markets and was a major source of referrals to Old
Line Bank. We conduct secondary market activity in our marine division as a broker and we earn a
fee. In addition to increasing our non-interest income, we expect to capitalize on our
relationships with high net worth individuals as a result of loans we make through this division.
The establishment of this division increased non-interest expense by $61,345 for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 and increased non-interest revenue by $25,757 during the same period. By
the fourth quarter of 2005, we anticipate this division will have a modest, positive impact on net
income.
Other Opportunities
We use the Internet and technology to augment our growth plans. Currently, we offer our
customers image technology, telephone banking and Internet banking with on-line account access. We
will continue to evaluate cost effective ways that technology can enhance our management, products
and services.
We plan to take advantage of strategic opportunities presented to us via mergers occurring in
our marketplace. For example, we may purchase branches that other banks close or lease branch space
from other banks. We currently have no specific plans regarding acquisitions of existing financial
institutions or branches thereof.
21
Results of Operations
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the difference between income on interest earning assets and the cost
of funds supporting those assets. Earning assets are comprised primarily of loans, investments, and
federal funds sold; interest-bearing deposits and other borrowings make up the cost of funds.
Non-interest bearing deposits and capital are also funding sources. Changes in the volume and mix
of earning assets and funding sources along with changes in associated interest rates determine
changes in net interest income.
Six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to six months ended June 30, 2004
Net interest income after provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2005
increased 31.25% to $2.1 million from $1.6 million for the same period in 2004. The increase was
primarily attributable to a 32.53% or $28.5 million increase in total average interest earning
assets to $116.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 from $87.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2004.
Interest revenue increased from $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 to $3.1
million for the same period in 2005. Interest expense for all interest bearing liabilities amounted
to $881,706 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 versus $563,731 for the six months ended June
30, 2004. As discussed below and outlined in detail in the Rate/Volume Analysis, these changes were
a result of normal business growth offset by increases in the interest rates.
Our net interest margin was 3.88% for the first six months of 2005, as compared to 3.94% for
the first six months of 2004. The decrease in the net interest margin is the result of several
components. The yield on average interest-earning assets improved during the period 20 basis points
from 5.22% in 2004 to 5.42% in 2005, and average interest-earning assets grew by $28.5 million.
However, a 30 basis point increase of the yield on average interest-bearing liabilities from 1.87%
in 2004 to 2.17% in 2005, and a $21.4 million increase in interest bearing liabilities offset these
improvements. The yield on average interest-earning assets improved because the prime rate was
4.00% from January 1, 2004 through June 30, 2004 when it increased to 4.25%. On January 1, 2005,
the rate was 5.25% with a 100 basis point increase during the period to 6.25% at June 30, 2005. The
increase in the yield on average interest bearing liabilities occurred because of a promotional
campaign used to attract certificates of deposits in January 2005 and increased rates. We expect
improvement in our net interest margin during the year because of the increase in the prime rate
and because we expect loans to grow at a faster rate than interest bearing liabilities. We will
offer promotional campaigns to attract deposits throughout the year if required to maintain an
acceptable loan to deposit ratio.
2004 compared to 2003
Net interest income after provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2004
amounted to $3.5 million, which was $869,381 or 32.97% greater than the 2003 level of $2.6 million.
Interest income increased from $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 to $4.9
million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The yield on interest earning assets was 5.31% in
2004, which was nine basis points less than the 2003 level of 5.40%.
Average loans, net of allowance, were $69.0 million in 2004, compared to $51.2 million in
2003. The related interest income including fees from loans was $4.2 million in 2004, or $804,662
greater than the 2003 level of $3.4 million. The average yield on loans decreased to 5.95% in 2004
from 6.49% in 2003, as a result of the reduction in the prime rate. On December 31, 2002, the prime
rate was 4.25%. By December 31, 2003, the prime rate had declined to 4.00% where it remained until
July 2004. During this six month period of 2004, interest income and the average yield on the
portfolio declined. During the period of July 2004 to December 2004, the prime rate increased to
5.00%, ending on December 31, 2004 at 5.25%. As a result, we began to see improvement in the loan
yield, but this improvement was not sufficient to offset the earlier decline. Investment securities
and other earning assets, such as federal funds sold, contributed $739,180 to interest income for
the year ended December 31, 2004. This represents an increase of $27,181 over the 2003 level of
$711,999. This increase was a result of higher average
22
balances maintained in investment securities. These balances derived from the funds received in the
equity offering and higher average deposit levels.
Interest expense for all interest bearing liabilities amounted to $1.2 million in 2004, which
was $95,538 lower than the 2003 level of $1.3 million. The cost of interest bearing liabilities was
1.80% in 2004, or 48 basis points lower than the 2003 level of 2.28%. The decrease in interest
expense resulted from declining market interest rates exceeding the increase in interest bearing
liabilities. Consistent with asset growth, average interest bearing funding sources (deposits and
borrowed funds) grew to $64.6 million in 2004, which was $9.5 million greater than the 2003 level
of $55.1 million. Average non-interest bearing deposits grew $4.6 million to $21.2 million at
December 31, 2004 compared to $16.6 million at December 31, 2003.
2003 compared to 2002
Net interest income after provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2003
amounted to $2.6 million, which was $490,114 or 22.83% greater than the 2002 level of $2.1 million.
Interest income increased from $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 to $4.1
million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase was primarily attributable to
substantial increases in earning assets, which was somewhat offset by decreasing market interest
rates. The increase in earning assets was directly attributable to the increased legal lending
limit, the opening of the Clinton, Maryland branch and increased marketing efforts.
Average loans, net of allowance, were $51.2 million in 2003, compared to $36.9 million in
2002. The related interest income including fees from loans was $3.4 million in 2003, or $494,512
greater than the 2002 level of $2.8 million. The average yield on loans decreased to 6.49% in 2003
from 7.66% in 2002, as a result of the reduction in the prime rate from 4.75% at December 31, 2001
to 4.00% at December 31, 2003. Investment securities and other earning assets, such as federal
funds sold, contributed $711,999 to interest income for the year ended December 31, 2003. This
represents a decrease of $219,700 from the 2002 level of $931,699 as a higher level of assets was
maintained in lower rate federal funds for future deployment into loan growth and interest rates
declined during the period. The yield on earning assets was 5.40% in 2003, which was 93 basis
points lower than the 2002 level of 6.33%.
Interest expense for all interest bearing liabilities amounted to $1.3 million in 2003, which
was $238,142 lower than the 2002 level of $1.5 million. The cost of interest bearing liabilities
was 2.28% in 2003, or 86 basis points lower than the 2002 level of 3.14%. The decrease in interest
expense resulted from declining market interest rates exceeding the increase in interest bearing
liabilities. Consistent with asset growth, average funding sources (deposits and borrowed funds)
grew to $71.7 million in 2003, which was $13.2 million greater than the 2002 level of $58.5
million.
The following table illustrates average balances of total interest earning assets and total
interest bearing liabilities for the periods indicated, showing the average distribution of assets,
total liabilities, stockholders equity and related income, expense and corresponding weighted
average yields and rates. The average balances used in this table and other statistical data were
calculated using average daily balances.
23
Average Balances, Interest, and Yields
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Yield |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Yield |
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds Sold |
|
$ |
13,370,288 |
|
|
$ |
183,003 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
% |
|
$ |
4,288,086 |
|
|
$ |
21,097 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
% |
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
115,470 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
|
659,890 |
|
|
|
9,491 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
Investment
Securities (1) (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
|
4,000,450 |
|
|
|
66,407 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
|
|
|
3,188,183 |
|
|
|
52,007 |
|
|
|
3.23 |
|
U.S. Agency |
|
|
7,475,004 |
|
|
|
125,145 |
|
|
|
3.33 |
|
|
|
8,876,931 |
|
|
|
159,458 |
|
|
|
3.55 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2,346,376 |
|
|
|
45,969 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
|
|
|
3,225,328 |
|
|
|
63,877 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
Tax exempt securities |
|
|
3,514,248 |
|
|
|
84,485 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
|
|
|
3,283,925 |
|
|
|
84,779 |
|
|
|
5.11 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,570,276 |
|
|
|
23,251 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
|
854,439 |
|
|
|
18,206 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
18,906,354 |
|
|
|
345,257 |
|
|
|
3.63 |
|
|
|
19,428,806 |
|
|
|
378,327 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
11,961,409 |
|
|
|
424,702 |
|
|
|
7.16 |
|
|
|
8,455,232 |
|
|
|
298,372 |
|
|
|
7.10 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
50,693,693 |
|
|
|
1,595,463 |
|
|
|
6.35 |
|
|
|
35,791,803 |
|
|
|
1,040,681 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
Installment |
|
|
21,892,481 |
|
|
|
567,972 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
|
|
|
19,607,026 |
|
|
|
534,963 |
|
|
|
5.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross loans |
|
|
84,547,583 |
|
|
|
2,588,137 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
|
|
|
63,854,061 |
|
|
|
1,874,016 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
815,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
597,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of allowance |
|
|
83,732,569 |
|
|
|
2,588,137 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
|
|
|
63,257,012 |
|
|
|
1,874,016 |
|
|
|
5.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
116,124,681 |
|
|
|
3,118,521 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
|
|
|
87,633,794 |
|
|
|
2,282,931 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing cash |
|
|
2,920,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,394,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
2,378,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,280,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,187,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
990,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
122,610,315 |
|
|
$ |
3,118,521 |
|
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
$ |
93,299,070 |
|
|
$ |
2,282,931 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
$ |
10,199,443 |
|
|
$ |
24,117 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
% |
|
$ |
10,607,277 |
|
|
$ |
26,370 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
% |
Money market and NOW |
|
|
18,892,714 |
|
|
|
58,426 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
15,268,556 |
|
|
|
34,428 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
42,289,229 |
|
|
|
656,652 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
29,012,512 |
|
|
|
392,017 |
|
|
|
2.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
71,381,386 |
|
|
|
739,195 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
54,888,345 |
|
|
|
452,815 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
10,580,445 |
|
|
|
142,511 |
|
|
|
2.72 |
|
|
|
5,696,703 |
|
|
|
110,916 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
81,961,831 |
|
|
|
881,706 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
|
|
|
60,585,048 |
|
|
|
563,731 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
|
Non interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
26,498,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,668,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,460,501 |
|
|
|
881,706 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
|
80,253,532 |
|
|
|
563,731 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
510,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
13,639,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,671,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
122,610,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,299,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,236,815 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,719,200 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest revenue is presented on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis. The FTE basis
adjusts for the tax favored status of these types of securities. Management believes
providing this information on a FTE basis provides investors with a more accurate picture
of our net interest spread and net interest income and we believe it to be the preferred
industry measurement of these calculations. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures. |
|
(2) |
|
Available for sale investment securities are presented at amortized cost. |
|
(3) |
|
We had no non-accruing loans for the periods presented. |
24
Average Balances, Interest and Yields
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
balance |
|
Interest |
|
Yield |
|
balance |
|
Interest |
|
Yield |
|
balance |
|
Interest |
|
Yield |
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
$ |
4,055,755 |
|
|
$ |
51,368 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
% |
|
$ |
7,990,566 |
|
|
$ |
82,300 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
% |
|
$ |
6,809,790 |
|
|
$ |
109,880 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
% |
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
551,093 |
|
|
|
16,746 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
|
629,041 |
|
|
|
14,759 |
|
|
|
2.35 |
% |
|
|
347,945 |
|
|
|
8,297 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
% |
Investment securities (1) (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
|
3,654,031 |
|
|
|
119,041 |
|
|
|
3.26 |
% |
|
|
152,131 |
|
|
|
5,074 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Agency |
|
|
8,752,327 |
|
|
|
308,354 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
10,633,180 |
|
|
|
412,000 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
% |
|
|
11,806,666 |
|
|
|
609,988 |
|
|
|
5.17 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2,988,771 |
|
|
|
118,088 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
% |
|
|
2,721,922 |
|
|
|
101,186 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
% |
|
|
2,969,958 |
|
|
|
160,498 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
% |
Tax exempt securities |
|
|
3,401,218 |
|
|
|
163,754 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
% |
|
|
2,741,896 |
|
|
|
138,725 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
% |
|
|
694,697 |
|
|
|
31,966 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
% |
Other |
|
|
1,015,507 |
|
|
|
35,097 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
% |
|
|
492,883 |
|
|
|
24,242 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
% |
|
|
378,988 |
|
|
|
20,832 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
19,811,854 |
|
|
|
744,334 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
% |
|
|
16,742,012 |
|
|
|
681,227 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
% |
|
|
15,850,309 |
|
|
|
823,284 |
|
|
|
5.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
9,224,604 |
|
|
|
648,870 |
|
|
|
7.03 |
% |
|
|
6,421,338 |
|
|
|
528,249 |
|
|
|
8.23 |
% |
|
|
5,842,925 |
|
|
|
533,785 |
|
|
|
9.14 |
% |
Mortgage |
|
|
39,958,732 |
|
|
|
2,388,944 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
|
27,023,348 |
|
|
|
1,731,030 |
|
|
|
6.41 |
% |
|
|
17,156,866 |
|
|
|
1,274,959 |
|
|
|
7.43 |
% |
Installment |
|
|
20,517,755 |
|
|
|
1,112,861 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
18,209,333 |
|
|
|
1,091,574 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
% |
|
|
14,278,193 |
|
|
|
1,047,597 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
69,701,091 |
|
|
|
4,150,675 |
|
|
|
5.95 |
% |
|
|
51,654,019 |
|
|
|
3,350,853 |
|
|
|
6.49 |
% |
|
|
37,277,984 |
|
|
|
2,856,341 |
|
|
|
7.66 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
654,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of allowance |
|
|
69,047,084 |
|
|
|
4,150,675 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
% |
|
|
51,172,318 |
|
|
|
3,350,853 |
|
|
|
6.55 |
% |
|
|
36,947,089 |
|
|
|
2,856,341 |
|
|
|
7.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
93,465,786 |
|
|
|
4,963,123 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
% |
|
|
76,533,937 |
|
|
|
4,129,139 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
59,955,133 |
|
|
|
3,797,802 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing cash |
|
|
2,471,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,028,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,737,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
2,278,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,129,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,758,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,108,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,040,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
901,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
99,324,908 |
|
|
$ |
4,963,123 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
$ |
81,731,927 |
|
|
$ |
4,129,139 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
% |
|
$ |
64,352,291 |
|
|
$ |
3,797,802 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholdersequity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
$ |
11,252,236 |
|
|
$ |
54,698 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
% |
|
$ |
12,560,842 |
|
|
$ |
64,886 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
% |
|
$ |
10,320,302 |
|
|
$ |
87,873 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
% |
Money market and NOW |
|
|
16,912,834 |
|
|
|
78,162 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
12,110,101 |
|
|
|
69,953 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
8,211,172 |
|
|
|
69,791 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
% |
Other time deposits |
|
|
30,438,116 |
|
|
|
800,697 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
% |
|
|
26,375,442 |
|
|
|
928,560 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
25,176,433 |
|
|
|
1,144,434 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposit |
|
|
58,603,186 |
|
|
|
933,557 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
% |
|
|
51,046,385 |
|
|
|
1,063,399 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
% |
|
|
43,707,907 |
|
|
|
1,302,098 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
% |
Borrowed funds |
|
|
6,036,503 |
|
|
|
229,696 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
% |
|
|
4,053,425 |
|
|
|
195,392 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
% |
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
194,835 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
64,639,689 |
|
|
|
1,163,253 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
% |
|
|
55,099,810 |
|
|
|
1,258,791 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
47,707,907 |
|
|
|
1,496,933 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
% |
Non-interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
21,222,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,643,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,839,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,862,541 |
|
|
|
1,163,253 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
|
71,743,537 |
|
|
|
1,258,791 |
|
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
58,547,873 |
|
|
|
1,496,933 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
% |
Other liabilities |
|
|
431,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
795,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
13,031,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,192,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,278,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
|
$ |
99,324,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,731,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
64,352,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.19 |
% |
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,799,870 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,870,348 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,300,869 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest revenue is presented on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis. The FTE basis
adjusts for the tax favored status of these types of securities. Management believes providing this
information on a FTE basis provides investors with a more accurate picture of our net interest
spread and net interest income and we believe it to be the preferred industry measurement of these
calculations. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures. |
|
(2) |
|
Available for sale investment securities are presented at amortized cost. |
|
(3) |
|
We had no non-accruing loans for the periods presented. |
The following table describes the impact on our interest income and expense resulting from
changes in average balances and average rates for the periods indicated. The change in interest
income due to both volume and rate is reported with the rate variance.
Rate /Volume Variance Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 compared to 2004 |
|
|
Variance due to: |
|
|
Total |
|
Rate |
|
Volume |
Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds Sold |
|
$ |
161,906 |
|
|
$ |
117,319 |
|
|
$ |
44,587 |
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
(7,367 |
) |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
(7,802 |
) |
Investment Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
|
14,400 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
13,190 |
|
U.S. Agency |
|
|
(34,313 |
) |
|
|
(9,291 |
) |
|
|
(25,022 |
) |
Mortgage backed |
|
|
(17,908 |
) |
|
|
(585 |
) |
|
|
(17,323 |
) |
Tax exempt securities |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
(6,211 |
) |
|
|
5,917 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,045 |
|
|
|
(10,107 |
) |
|
|
15,152 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
126,330 |
|
|
|
2,884 |
|
|
|
123,446 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
554,782 |
|
|
|
122,484 |
|
|
|
432,298 |
|
Installment |
|
|
33,009 |
|
|
|
(29,211 |
) |
|
|
62,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest revenue (1) |
|
|
835,590 |
|
|
|
188,927 |
|
|
|
646,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
|
(2,253 |
) |
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
Money market and NOW |
|
|
23,998 |
|
|
|
15,911 |
|
|
|
8,087 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
264,635 |
|
|
|
85,556 |
|
|
|
179,079 |
|
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
31,595 |
|
|
|
(63,340 |
) |
|
|
94,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
317,975 |
|
|
|
36,885 |
|
|
|
281,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
517,615 |
|
|
$ |
152,042 |
|
|
$ |
365,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest revenue is presented on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis. The FTE basis
adjusts for the tax favored status of these types of securities. Management believes
providing this information on a FTE basis provides investors with a more accurate picture
of our net interest spread and net interest income and we believe it to be the preferred
industry measurement of these calculations. See Reconciliation of Non- GAAP Measures. |
26
Rate/Volume Variance Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve months Ended December 31, |
|
Twelve months Ended December 31, |
|
|
2004 compared to 2003 |
|
2003 compared to 2002 |
|
|
Variance due to: |
|
Variance due to: |
|
|
Total |
|
Rate |
|
Volume |
|
Total |
|
Rate |
|
Volume |
Interest Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
$ |
(30,932 |
) |
|
$ |
9,597 |
|
|
$ |
(40,529 |
) |
|
$ |
(27,580 |
) |
|
$ |
(46,590 |
) |
|
$ |
19,010 |
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
3,819 |
|
|
|
(1,832 |
) |
|
|
6,462 |
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
6,690 |
|
Investment Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasuries |
|
|
113,967 |
|
|
|
(2,996 |
) |
|
|
116,963 |
|
|
|
5,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,074 |
|
U.S. Agency |
|
|
(103,646 |
) |
|
|
(30,857 |
) |
|
|
(72,789 |
) |
|
|
(197,988 |
) |
|
|
(137,319 |
) |
|
|
(60,669 |
) |
Mortgage backed |
|
|
16,902 |
|
|
|
6,975 |
|
|
|
9,927 |
|
|
|
(59,312 |
) |
|
|
(45,918 |
) |
|
|
(13,394 |
) |
State, county, municipals |
|
|
25,029 |
|
|
|
(8,332 |
) |
|
|
33,361 |
|
|
|
106,759 |
|
|
|
12,588 |
|
|
|
94,171 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,855 |
|
|
|
(14,858 |
) |
|
|
25,713 |
|
|
|
3,410 |
|
|
|
(2,854 |
) |
|
|
6,264 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
120,621 |
|
|
|
(110,087 |
) |
|
|
230,708 |
|
|
|
(5,536 |
) |
|
|
(58,403 |
) |
|
|
52,867 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
657,914 |
|
|
|
(171,244 |
) |
|
|
829,158 |
|
|
|
456,071 |
|
|
|
(277,008 |
) |
|
|
733,079 |
|
Installment |
|
|
21,287 |
|
|
|
(116,987 |
) |
|
|
138,274 |
|
|
|
43,977 |
|
|
|
(244,569 |
) |
|
|
288,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest revenue(1) |
|
|
833,984 |
|
|
|
(434,970 |
) |
|
|
1,268,954 |
|
|
|
331,337 |
|
|
|
(800,301 |
) |
|
|
1,131,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and NOW deposits |
|
|
(10,188 |
) |
|
|
(3,383 |
) |
|
|
(6,805 |
) |
|
|
(22,987 |
) |
|
|
(42,064 |
) |
|
|
19,077 |
|
Money market |
|
|
8,209 |
|
|
|
(19,647 |
) |
|
|
27,856 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
(32,977 |
) |
|
|
33,139 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
(127,863 |
) |
|
|
(270,869 |
) |
|
|
143,006 |
|
|
|
(215,874 |
) |
|
|
(270,377 |
) |
|
|
54,503 |
|
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
34,304 |
|
|
|
(61,280 |
) |
|
|
95,584 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
(2,045 |
) |
|
|
2,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
(95,538 |
) |
|
|
(355,179 |
) |
|
|
259,641 |
|
|
|
(238,142 |
) |
|
|
(347,463 |
) |
|
|
109,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
929,522 |
|
|
$ |
(79,791 |
) |
|
$ |
1,009,313 |
|
|
$ |
569,479 |
|
|
$ |
(452,838 |
) |
|
$ |
1,022,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest revenue is presented on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis. Management
believes providing this information on a FTE basis provides investors with a more accurate picture
of our net interest spread and net interest income and we believe it to be the preferred industry
measurement of these calculations. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures. |
Provision for Loan Losses
Originating loans involves a degree of risk that credit losses will occur in varying amounts
according to, among other factors, the type of loans being made, the credit-worthiness of the
borrowers over the term of the loans, the quality of the collateral for the loan, if any, as well
as general economic conditions. We charge the provision for loan losses to earnings to maintain the
total allowance for loan losses at a level considered by management to represent its best estimate
of the losses known and inherent in the portfolio that are both probable and reasonable to
estimate, based on, among other factors, prior loss experience, volume and type of lending
conducted, estimated value of any underlying collateral, economic conditions (particularly as such
conditions relate to Old Line Banks market area), regulatory guidance, peer statistics,
managements judgment, past due loans in the loan portfolio, loan charge-off experience and
concentrations of risk (if any). We charge losses on loans against the allowance when we believe
that collection of loan principal is unlikely. Recoveries on loans previously charged off are added
back to the allowance.
27
The provision for loan losses was $125,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, as compared
to $90,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an increase of $35,000 or 38.89%. The increase
was primarily the result of growth in loan balances outstanding in all segments of the portfolio as
well as a change in the composition of the portfolio. If the loan portfolio continues to grow at
the rate we anticipate it will grow, we expect that we will increase the provision for loan losses
at a higher rate than we did during the first six months of the year.
The provision for loan losses was $220,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004, as compared
to $162,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $58,000 or 35.80%. The increase
was primarily the result of growth in loan balances outstanding in all segments of the portfolio as
well as a change in the composition of the portfolio.
We review the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses at least quarterly. Our review
includes evaluation of impaired loans as required by SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan, and SFAS No. 118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan-Income
Recognition and Disclosure. Also incorporated in determining the adequacy of the allowance is
guidance contained in the Securities and Exchange Commissions SAB No. 102, Loan Loss Allowance
Methodology and Documentation; and the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Councils Policy
Statement on Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses Methodologies and Documentation for Banks and
Savings Institutions.
We base the evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses upon loan categories.
We categorize loans as installment and other consumer loans (other than boat loans), boat loans,
mortgage loans (commercial real estate, residential real estate and real estate construction) and
commercial loans. We apply loss ratios to each category of loans other than commercial loans
(including letters of credit and unused commitments). We further divide commercial loans by risk
rating and apply loss ratios by risk rating, to determine estimated loss amounts. We evaluate
delinquent loans and loans for which management has knowledge about possible credit problems of the
borrower or knowledge of problems with loan collateral separately and assign loss amounts based
upon the evaluation.
We determine loss ratios for installment and other consumer loans (other than boat loans),
boat loans and mortgage loans (commercial real estate, residential real estate and real estate
construction) based upon a review of prior 18 months delinquency trends for the category, the three
year loss ratio for the category, peer group loss ratios and industry standards.
With respect to commercial loans, management assigns a risk rating of one through eight to
each loan at inception, with a risk rating of one having the least amount of risk and a risk rating
of eight having the greatest amount of risk. For commercial loans of less than $250,000, we may
review the risk rating annually based on, among other things, the borrowers financial condition,
cash flow and ongoing financial viability; the collateral securing the loan; the borrowers
industry and payment history. We review the risk rating for all commercial loans in excess of
$250,000 at least annually. We evaluate loans with a risk rating of five or greater separately and
assign loss amounts based upon the evaluation. For loans with risk ratings between one and four, we
determine loss ratios based upon a review of prior 18 months delinquency trends, the three year
loss ratio, peer group loss ratios and industry standards.
We also identify and make any necessary allocation adjustments for any specific concentrations
of credit in a loan category that in managements estimation increase the risk inherent in the
category. If necessary, we will also make an adjustment within one or more loan categories for
economic considerations in our market area that may impact the quality of the loans in the
category. For all periods presented, there were no specific adjustments made for concentrations of
credit or economic considerations.
In the event that our review of the adequacy of the allowance results in any unallocated
amounts, we reallocate such amounts to our loan categories based on the percentage that each
category represents to total gross loans. We have risk management practices designed to ensure
timely identification of changes in loan risk profiles. However, undetected losses inherently exist
within the portfolio. We believe that the allocation of the unallocated portion of the reserve in
the manner described above is appropriate.
28
We will not create a separate valuation allowance unless we consider a loan impaired under
SFAS No. 114 and SFAS No. 118. For all periods presented, we had no impaired loans.
Our policies require a review of assets on a regular basis, and we believe that we
appropriately classify loans as well as other assets if warranted. We believe that we use the best
information available to make a determination with respect to the allowance for loan losses,
recognizing that the determination is inherently subjective and that future adjustments may be
necessary depending upon, among other factors, a change in economic conditions of specific
borrowers or generally in the economy, and new information
that becomes available to us. However, there are no assurances that the allowance for loan
losses will be sufficient to absorb losses on non-performing assets, or that the allowance will be
sufficient to cover losses on non-performing assets in the future.
The allowance for loan losses represents 0.95% of gross loans at June 30, 2005 and 0.91% of
gross loans at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and 0.90% of gross loans at December 31, 2002. Old Line
Bank has no exposure to foreign countries or foreign borrowers. Management believes that the
allowance for loan losses is adequate for each period presented.
The following table represents an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods
indicated:
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
744,862 |
|
|
$ |
547,690 |
|
|
$ |
547,690 |
|
|
$ |
389,553 |
|
|
$ |
268,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
162,000 |
|
|
|
144,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chargeoffs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(15,768 |
) |
|
|
(18,408 |
) |
|
|
(16,554 |
) |
|
|
(35,748 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total chargeoffs |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(15,768 |
) |
|
|
(39,007 |
) |
|
|
(16,554 |
) |
|
|
(35,748 |
) |
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
2,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
13,142 |
|
|
|
16,179 |
|
|
|
12,691 |
|
|
|
12,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
|
13,142 |
|
|
|
16,179 |
|
|
|
12,691 |
|
|
|
12,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net chargeoffs |
|
|
3,319 |
|
|
|
(2,627 |
) |
|
|
(22,828 |
) |
|
|
(3,863 |
) |
|
|
(23,253 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
873,181 |
|
|
$ |
635,063 |
|
|
$ |
744,862 |
|
|
$ |
547,690 |
|
|
$ |
389,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to gross loans |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
0.90 |
% |
Ratio of net-chargeoffs during period to
average loans outstanding during period |
|
|
(0.004 |
%) |
|
|
0.004 |
% |
|
|
0.033 |
% |
|
|
0.700 |
% |
|
|
0.620 |
% |
29
The following table provides a breakdown of the allowance for loan losses.
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
in Each |
|
|
Amount |
|
Category |
|
Amount |
|
Category |
|
Amount |
|
Category |
|
Amount |
|
Category |
|
Amount |
|
Category |
Installment &
others |
|
$ |
6,624 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
$ |
7,838 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
% |
|
$ |
7,120 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
$ |
9,840 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
% |
|
$ |
29,512 |
|
|
|
3.08 |
% |
Boat |
|
|
163,432 |
|
|
|
24.63 |
|
|
|
146,496 |
|
|
|
29.09 |
|
|
|
148,411 |
|
|
|
25.35 |
|
|
|
141,826 |
|
|
|
31.04 |
|
|
|
114,282 |
|
|
|
35.43 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
456,095 |
|
|
|
60.39 |
|
|
|
325,372 |
|
|
|
56.94 |
|
|
|
401,585 |
|
|
|
60.27 |
|
|
|
278,329 |
|
|
|
53.89 |
|
|
|
172,277 |
|
|
|
47.27 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
247,030 |
|
|
|
14.39 |
|
|
|
155,357 |
|
|
|
13.04 |
|
|
|
187,746 |
|
|
|
13.66 |
|
|
|
117,695 |
|
|
|
13.78 |
|
|
|
73,482 |
|
|
|
14.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
873,181 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
635,063 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
744,862 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
547,690 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
389,553 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest Revenue
Six-month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to six months ended June 30, 2004
Non-interest revenue totaled $262,718 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of
$8,853 or 3.26% from the 2004 amount of $271,571. Non-interest revenue for the six months ended
June 30, 2005 included primarily fee income from service charges on deposit accounts, mortgage
origination fees from a third party processor, credit card fees, ATM fees and gain on disposal of
assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, non-interest revenue also included broker
origination fees from the marine division.
Non-interest revenue declined during the six months ended June 30, 2005. Loan fees declined
$17,602 and letter of credit fees declined $5,466. A $19,482 increase in broker origination fees
generated by the marine division offset this decline. Loan fees and letter of credit fees declined
because we collected fewer fees on loans during the period.
In the second quarter of 2005, we began classifying fees from advances on
construction loans as part of interest income instead of non-interest revenue. In 2005, management
determined that this revenue relates more to the use of funds than to commitments to make such
funds available. We have also re-classified these fees for 2004 and 2003. Some of our residential
builders who have revolving lines of credit for home construction pay fees for us to provide
advances under these revolving lines of credit. The amounts reclassified did not have a material
effect on total interest revenue on loans or other non-interest revenue.
2004 compared to 2003
Non-interest revenue for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003
included fee income from service charges on deposit accounts, mortgage origination fees from a
third party processor, credit card fees, ATM fees and gain on disposal of assets. Non-interest
revenue totaled $554,201 for the year ended December 31, 2004, or $17,122 or 3.19% higher than the
2003 amount of $537,079. The increase was primarily because of a $100,329 or 47.99% increase in
other fees and commissions during the period offset by an $88,359 decline in gain on disposal of
assets. Other fees and commissions consist of broker/origination fees, other loan fees and letter
of credit fees. Other loan fees increased $133,549 to $224,883 for the twelve months ended December
31, 2004 compared to $91,334 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003. This increase was
primarily due to the increase in the dollar value of commitments accepted by customers during the
period. Letter of credit fees increased $20,643 due to an increase in the dollar value of letters
of credit issued. These increases were offset by a $61,857 decline in broker/origination fees.
Broker fees declined because of a rise in interest rates that caused a decrease in the refinancing
of residential mortgages. We had no gains on disposal of assets because we sold no assets during
the
30
period.
2003 compared to 2002
Non-interest revenue consisted primarily of gains on securities sales, fee income from service
charges on deposit accounts, mortgage origination fees from a third party processor, credit card
fees and ATM fees. Revenues amounted to $537,079 for the year ended December 31, 2003, or 22.11%
higher than the 2002 amount of $439,846. As part of our business strategy, we continued to focus
our efforts on increasing the levels of non-interest income during 2003. As a result of increased
volume as well as an increase in fees assessed on accounts, service charges on deposit accounts
increased $21,930 or 10.07% during 2003 to $239,679 from $217,749 in 2002. Other fees and
commissions also increased during the year by $25,290 or 13.76% to $209,041 versus $183,751 in
2002. This was largely attributable to an increase in mortgage origination fees received on
residential mortgages brokered to a third party processor caused by the historically low interest
rate environment as well as miscellaneous fees collected on loan originations. We also realized
gains on the sale of securities of $88,359 during 2003 versus $38,346 in 2002.
Non-interest Expense
Six-month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to six months ended June 30, 2004
Non-interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $1.6 million versus $1.3
million for the same period in 2004. The $259,443 or 19.23% increase was attributable to a $200,798
increase in salary and benefit expense, an $8,315 increase in occupancy expense, and a $58,555
increase in other operating expenses.
Salaries and benefits expenses increased because of general salary increases and because we
hired a new credit officer in March 2004, a new branch manager in September 2004 and a new loan
officer for the marine division in February 2005. Annual escalations in the leases caused the
increased occupancy expenses. Other operating expenses increased because of a $17,525 increase in
audit and legal fees, an $8,335 increase in stationary and supplies, a $6,700 increase in business
development and entertainment costs associated with the start up of the marine division. A $4,830
increase in stock transfer costs and NASDAQ fees associated with the 20% stock dividend, and a
$8,800 increase in director fees caused by an increase in the number of meetings and the fee paid
per meeting also contributed to the increase. A $29,753 reduction in robbery and security costs
offset these increases. In June 2004, we experienced a robbery loss and completed installation of
new security devices in all of our branches. These devices reduced security expenses and reduced
the risk of robbery.
2004 compared to 2003
Non-interest expense was $2.8 million in 2004, which was $326,357 or 13.17% greater than the
2003 level of $2.5 million. Salaries and benefit costs amounted to $1.7 million in 2004, as
compared to $1.4 million in 2003. Salaries and benefit expenses increased during the year because
we hired a new credit officer in March 2004. Additionally, prior to September 2004, the individual
responsible for overall branch administration was also managing the Clinton branch. In September of
2004, we hired a new branch manager for Clinton. Salary and benefit expenses also increased because
of annual payroll increases and bonuses.
Occupancy expenses increased $3,060 in 2004 due to scheduled annual rental increases at the
Old Line Centre branch.
Other operating expenses increased $77,690 or 12.57% from $618,214 for the year ended December
31, 2003 to $695,904 for the year ended December 31, 2004. This increase occurred because of an
approximately $30,000 increase in expenses associated with SEC filings, and NASDAQ fees incurred by
the holding company that we did not have during the first nine months of 2003. Additionally, we
incurred a $25,000 expense that represented the deductible on Old Line Banks robbery insurance
policy
because of a robbery in June. During the year, we also increased director compensation by
$39,860. These increases were offset by an approximately $45,000 decrease in legal and
organizational costs and a $25,000 reduction in security costs. During the year, we installed
enhanced security equipment in all of our branches that caused the reduction in security costs.
Data processing expenses increased by approximately $13,292 from $113,260 for the year ended
December 31, 2003 compared to $126,552 for the period ended December 31, 2004. This increase
occurred because of an increase in the number of customers
31
and new services we began providing in 2004.
2003 compared to 2002
Non-interest expense was $2.5 million in 2003, which was $395,222 greater than the 2002 level
of $2.1 million. Salaries and benefit costs amounted to $1.4 million in 2003, as compared to $1.2
million in 2002. During 2003, the Clinton, Maryland branch was staffed for a full twelve months
versus approximately five months in 2002 and we added a commercial loan officer in January of 2003.
These items in addition to annual salary and bonus increases caused the increase in salaries and
benefits.
Occupancy expenses declined $2,911 or 1.44% in 2003. Prior to 2002, we expensed property taxes
in arrears based on the payment date. In 2002, in order to properly accrue for these expenses, we
double expensed the taxes during the year. As a result, property taxes were $17,639 higher in 2002
than in 2003. The reduced property tax expense in 2003 was offset by an increase in building
maintenance, improvements and depreciation expenses totaling $16,634.
Other operating expenses, including data processing, increased $128,692 or 21.35% from
$602,782 for the year ended December 31, 2002 to $731,474 for the year ended December 31, 2003.
This was primarily the result of a $61,564 increase in organizational and legal expenses and a
$34,684 increase in audit & exam fees.
Organizational and legal fees as well as audit fees increased primarily as a result of the expenses
associated with the formation of the holding company and listing on the Nasdaq Smallcap market.
Additionally, during 2002, the Accokeek and Old Line Centre branches experienced robbery related
losses. As a result, during the year, we increased security at all branch locations which increased
other operating expenses during 2003 by approximately $35,000. In 2003, director fees increased
$15,299 due to an increased number of meetings and an increase in meeting fees. Data processing
fees increased $14,356 as a result of increases in the number of customers as well as enhanced
services.
Income Taxes
Six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to six months ended June 30, 2004
Income tax expense was $258,298 (35.49%) of pre-tax income for the six months ended June 30,
2005 compared to $179,518 (35.18% of pre-tax net income) for the same period in 2004.
2004 compared to 2003
Income tax expense was $438,203 (34.92% of pre-tax income) for 2004 as compared to $224,616
(32.32% of pre-tax income) for 2003.
2003 compared to 2002
Income tax expense was $224,616 (32.32% of pre-tax income) for 2003 as compared to $164,884
(32.80% of pre-tax income) for 2002.
Net Income
Six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to six months ended June 30, 2004
Net income was $469,484 or $0.22 basic and diluted earnings per common share for the six month
period ending June 30, 2005, an increase of $138,783 or 41.97% compared to net income of $330,701
or $0.16 basic and $0.15 diluted earnings per common share for the same period in 2004. The
increase in net income was the result of a $485,859 increase in net interest income after provision
for loan losses. An $8,853 decrease in non-interest revenue, a $259,443 increase in non-interest
expense and a $78,780 increase in income tax expense for the period compared to the same period in
2004 offset the increase in net interest income. Earnings per share increased on a basic and
diluted basis because of the increase in net income.
32
2004 Compared to 2003
Net income was $816,641 or $0.38 basic and $0.38 diluted earnings per common share for the
year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $346,379 or 73.66%, compared to net income of $470,262
for the same period during 2003. The increase in net income was the result of increases in net
interest income of $927,381 and non-interest revenue of $17,122, offset by increases in the
provision of loan losses of $58,000, income tax expense of $213,587, and non-interest expense of
$326,537.
2003 Compared to 2002
Net income was $470,262 or $0.29 basic and $0.28 diluted earnings per common share for the
year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $132,393 or 39.18%, compared to net income of $337,869
for the same period during 2002. The increase in net income was the result of increases in net
interest income of $508,114 and non-interest revenue of $97,233, offset by increases in the
provision of loan losses of $18,000, income tax expense of $59,732, and non-interest expense of
$395,222.
Analysis of Financial Condition
Investment Securities
Our portfolio consists primarily of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government agency
securities, securities issued by states, counties and municipalities, mortgage-backed securities,
and certain equity securities, including Federal Reserve Bank Stock and Federal Home Loan Bank
Stock. The portfolio provides a source of liquidity, collateral for repurchase agreements as well
as a means of diversifying our earning asset portfolio. While we generally intend to hold the
investment portfolio assets until maturity, we classify a significant portion of the portfolio as
available for sale. We account for securities so classified at fair value and report the unrealized
appreciation and depreciation as a separate component of stockholders equity, net of income tax
effects. We account for securities classified in the held to maturity category at amortized cost.
We invest in securities for the yield they produce and not to profit from trading the securities.
There are no trading securities in the portfolio.
The investment portfolio at June 30, 2005 amounted to $16.9 million, a decrease of $945,559,
or 5.31%, from $17.8 million at December 31, 2004. The decrease in the investment portfolio
occurred because some of these assets matured or were called and we deployed the proceeds into
loans and federal funds for future loan fundings. The carrying value of available for sale
securities includes net unrealized losses of $178,962 at June 30, 2005 (reflected as unrealized
losses of $109,847 in stockholders equity after deferred taxes) as compared to net unrealized
losses of $141,229 ($90,386 net of taxes) as of December 31, 2004. In general, the increase in
unrealized losses was a result of rising interest rates.
The investment portfolio at December 31, 2004 amounted to $17.8 million, a decrease of $1.4
million, or 7.29%, from the December 31, 2003 amount of $19.2 million. Available for sale
investment securities decreased to $15.6 million at December 31, 2004 from $17.4 million at
December 31, 2003. Held
to maturity securities increased to $2.2 million at December 31, 2004 from $1.8 million at
December 31, 2003. The carrying value of available for sale securities included net unrealized
losses of $141,229 at December 31, 2004 (reflected as unrealized losses of $90,386 in stockholders
equity after deferred taxes) as compared to net unrealized losses of $109,732 ($69,914 net of
taxes) as of December 31, 2003. In general, the increase in unrealized losses was a result of
rising interest rates, the maturity of the securities or the fact that some of the securities were
called.
The investment portfolio at December 31, 2003 amounted to $19.2 million, an increase of
$446,190, or 2.38%, from the December 31, 2002 amount of $18.7 million. Available for sale
investment securities increased to $17.4 million at December 31, 2003 from $13.4 million at
December 31, 2002. Held to maturity securities decreased to $1.8 million at December 31, 2003 from
$5.4 million at December 31, 2002. This decrease occurred in the second quarter of 2003 when Old
Line Bank sold $1 million in investments that were previously classified as held-to maturity. As
required under FASB Statement No. 115 all securities previously classified as held to maturity were
reclassified as available-for-sale. The carrying value of available for sale securities included
net unrealized losses of $109,732 at December 31, 2003 (reflected as unrealized depreciation of
$69,914 in stockholders equity after deferred taxes) as compared to net unrealized appreciation of
$141,192 ($93,187 net of taxes) as of December
33
31, 2002. In general, the increase in unrealized losses was a result of rising interest rates, the
maturity of securities or the fact that some of the securities were called.
The following table sets forth a summary of the investment securities portfolio as of the
periods indicated. Available for sale securities are reported at estimated fair value; held to
maturity securities are reported at amortized cost.
Investment Securities
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Available For Sale Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
1,969 |
|
|
$ |
1,971 |
|
|
$ |
1,980 |
|
|
$ |
1,503 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. government agency |
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
|
8,680 |
|
|
|
7,778 |
|
|
|
9,332 |
|
|
|
8,075 |
|
State, county and municipal |
|
|
3,316 |
|
|
|
3,253 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
3,098 |
|
|
|
1,472 |
|
Mortgage backed |
|
|
2,122 |
|
|
|
2,842 |
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
3,448 |
|
|
|
3,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Available for Sale Securities |
|
$ |
14,667 |
|
|
$ |
16,746 |
|
|
$ |
15,612 |
|
|
$ |
17,381 |
|
|
$ |
13,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held To Maturity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
2,002 |
|
|
$ |
2,003 |
|
|
$ |
2,003 |
|
|
$ |
1,804 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. government agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
State, county and municipal |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Held to Maturity Securities |
|
$ |
2,204 |
|
|
$ |
2,205 |
|
|
$ |
2,204 |
|
|
$ |
1,804 |
|
|
$ |
5,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Securities |
|
$ |
1,128 |
|
|
$ |
868 |
|
|
$ |
1,080 |
|
|
$ |
818 |
|
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the maturities for the securities portfolio at June 30, 2005.
Amortized Cost, Carrying Value and Average Yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Available for Sale |
|
Held to Maturity |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Market |
|
Average |
|
Amortized |
|
Market |
|
Average |
|
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Yield |
|
|
|
Maturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Months or less |
|
$ |
655,100 |
|
|
$ |
646,253 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
>3 Months through 1 Yr. |
|
|
192,730 |
|
|
|
189,096 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>1 Year through 5 Yrs. |
|
|
12,363,432 |
|
|
|
12,192,105 |
|
|
|
3.23 |
% |
|
|
2,002,420 |
|
|
|
1,987,656 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
% |
>5 Years through 10 Yrs. |
|
|
1,634,971 |
|
|
|
1,639,817 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
201,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>10 Yrs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,280 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,846,233 |
|
|
$ |
14,667,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,203,871 |
|
|
$ |
2,193,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged Securities |
|
$ |
10,057,879 |
|
|
$ |
9,892,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,002,420 |
|
|
$ |
1,987,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual maturities of mortgage-backed securities are not reliable indicators of their
expected life because mortgage borrowers have the right to prepay mortgages at any time.
Additionally, the issuer may call the callable agency securities listed above prior to the
contractual maturity.
34
Investment in Pointer Ridge LLC
On July 22, 2004, Old Line Bancshares, Inc. executed an Operating Agreement as a member with
unaffiliated parties, Lucente Enterprises, Inc., and Chesapeake Custom Homes, LLC, as members, and
Chesapeake Pointer Ridge Manager, LLC, as manager, to establish Pointer Ridge Office Investment,
LLC (Pointer Ridge). The members ownership of Pointer Ridge is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Unaffiliated parties |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
Lucente Enterprises, Inc. |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
Chesapeake Custom Homes, LLC |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
Mr. Frank Lucente, Vice Chairman and a member of the Board of Directors of Old Line
Bancshares, Inc., is the President and majority owner of Lucente Enterprises, Inc. Lucente
Enterprises, Inc. is the manager and majority member of Chesapeake Custom Homes, LLC and Chesapeake
Pointer Ridge Manager, LLC.
The purpose of Pointer Ridge is to acquire, own, hold for profit, sell, assign, transfer,
operate, lease, develop, mortgage, refinance, pledge and otherwise deal with real property located
at the intersection of Pointer Ridge Road and Route 301 in Bowie, Maryland. Pointer Ridge has
acquired the property and plans to construct a commercial office building containing approximately
40,000 square feet. Old Line Bancshares, Inc. plans to lease approximately 50% of this building for
its main office (moving its existing main office from Waldorf, Maryland) and a branch of Old Line
Bank. On August 26, 2004, Old Line Bancshares, Inc. transferred its initial $550,000 capital
contribution to Pointer Ridge and on September 16, 2005
transferred an additional $182,500 to Pointer Ridge as a capital
contribution.
In
April 2005, Pointer Ridge executed a contract with Waverly
Construction Inc. (Waverly), an unrelated party, to
begin construction of an approximately 40,000 square foot commercial office building at the
property. The contract sum is four million one hundred eight thousand dollars ($4,108,000). The
contract stipulates that Waverly will begin work within seven calendar days of the receipt of (1)
notice to proceed from Pointer Ridge; (2) grading permit; (3) building permit; (4) fully executed
contract; and (5) written verification from Pointer Ridge of funding for the project being in
place. Waverly has received notice to proceed and a fully executed contract from Pointer Ridge, and
a grading and building permit from Prince Georges County.
Although Waverly had not received
written verification from Pointer Ridge that funding for the project
was in place, Waverly began
construction of the project in May 2005 and the building is partially
complete.
Pointer
Ridge is currently in negotiations with an unrelated bank to obtain
funding for construction and permanent financing on the building. We
anticipate that the loan amount will be approximately $6,000,000 and
will contain market terms. Old Line Bancshares, Inc. will
be required to guaranty the construction of the building, and will be
required to guarantee the payment of up to fifty percent (50%) of all
costs and expenses incurred in completing the construction of the
building, provided, in either case, that the lender continues to advance sums under the loan. We anticipate that the construction financing will be in
place by October 20, 2005. Prior to completion of construction
of the building, Pointer Ridge may require additional capital
contributions from its members. We anticipate moving to our new
headquarters in the first quarter of 2006.
Loan Portfolio
Loans secured by real estate or luxury boats comprise the majority of the loan portfolio. Old
Line Banks loan customers are generally located in the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
The loan portfolio, net of allowance, unearned fees and origination costs increased $9.8
million or 12.02% to $91.3 million at June 30, 2005 from $81.5 million at December 31, 2004. This
growth was attributable to increased business development efforts. Commercial business loans
increased by $2 million (17.86%), commercial real estate loans (generally owner-occupied) increased
by $5.6 million (16.33%), residential real estate loans (generally home equity and fixed rate home
improvement loans) increased by $3.2 million (37.65%), real estate construction loans decreased by
$2.7 million (40.91%) and installment loans increased by $1.8 million (8.41%) from their respective
balances at December 31, 2004.
During the first six months of 2005, our increased business development efforts have allowed
Old Line Bank to establish several new customer relationships and expand existing relationships.
Considering our current backlog of approved loans, and the addition of the new loan production
office in College Park, Maryland, we anticipate that loan growth will continue during the remainder
of 2005.
35
The loan portfolio, net of allowance, unearned fees and origination costs increased $22.0
million or 36.97% to $81.5 million at December 31, 2004 from $59.5 million at December 31, 2003.
Commercial business loans increased by $2.9 million (34.94%), commercial real estate loans
(generally owner-occupied) increased by $7.4 million (27.51%), residential real estate loans
(generally home equity and fixed rate home improvement loans) increased by $4.9 million (136.11%),
real estate construction loans increased by $4.8 million (266.67%) and installment loans increased
by $2 million (10.31%) from their respective balances at December 31, 2003.
The loan portfolio, net of allowance, unearned fees and origination costs increased $16.4
million or 38.05% to $59.5 million at December 31, 2003 from $43.1 million at December 31, 2002.
Commercial business loans increased by $2.1 million (33.87%), commercial real estate loans
(generally owner-occupied) increased by $10.2 million (61.08%), residential real estate loans
(generally home equity and fixed rate home improvement loans) increased by $757,067 (26.25%), real
estate construction loans increased by $883,107 (100.51%) and installment loans increased by $2.7
million (16.17%) from their respective balances at December 31, 2002.
The increase in our legal lending limit that occurred as a result of our June 2003 capital
offering allowed us to retain a higher percentage of loans that we had previously participated to
other financial institutions. In 2002, we participated out approximately $7 million in loans that
we originated because they would have exceeded our legal lending limit. As a result of the capital
offering, we were able to retain all or a larger portion of these types of loans in the third and
fourth quarters of 2003 and during all subsequent periods.
The following table summarizes the composition of the loan portfolio by dollar amount and
percentages:
Loan Portfolio
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
39,857 |
|
|
|
43.43 |
% |
|
$ |
34,300 |
|
|
|
41.86 |
% |
|
$ |
26,859 |
|
|
|
44.87 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
3,885 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
|
6,551 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
Residential |
|
|
11,686 |
|
|
|
12.73 |
|
|
|
8,530 |
|
|
|
10.41 |
|
|
|
3,641 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
13,205 |
|
|
|
14.39 |
|
|
|
11,190 |
|
|
|
13.66 |
|
|
|
8,251 |
|
|
|
13.78 |
|
Installment |
|
|
23,152 |
|
|
|
25.22 |
|
|
|
21,356 |
|
|
|
26.07 |
|
|
|
19,355 |
|
|
|
32.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,785 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
81,927 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
59,868 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net deferred loan (fees) and costs |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
91,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
The following table presents the maturities or repricing periods of selected loans
outstanding at June 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Maturity Distribution at June 30, 2005 |
|
|
1 year or less |
|
1-5 years |
|
After 5 years |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
15,670 |
|
|
$ |
20,980 |
|
|
$ |
3,207 |
|
|
$ |
39,857 |
|
Construction |
|
|
3,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,885 |
|
Residential |
|
|
9,901 |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
11,686 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
8,594 |
|
|
|
4,472 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
13,205 |
|
Installment |
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
21,904 |
|
|
|
23,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
$ |
38,887 |
|
|
$ |
27,152 |
|
|
$ |
25,746 |
|
|
$ |
91,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rates |
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
12,944 |
|
|
|
24,955 |
|
|
|
41,469 |
|
Variable Rates |
|
|
35,317 |
|
|
|
14,208 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
50,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
$ |
38,887 |
|
|
$ |
27,152 |
|
|
$ |
25,746 |
|
|
$ |
91,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality
Management performs reviews of all delinquent loans and relationship officers are charged with
working with customers to resolve potential credit issues in a timely manner. Management generally
classifies loans as non-accrual when collection of full principal and interest under the original
terms of the loan is not expected or payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past due.
Classifying a loan as non-accrual results in our no longer accruing interest on such loan and
reversing any interest previously accrued but not collected. We will generally restore a
non-accrual loan to accrual status when delinquent principal and interest payments are brought
current and we expect to collect future monthly principal and interest payments. We recognize
interest on non-accrual loans only when received.
There were no non-accrual loans as of June 30, 2005 or December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. No
loans were 90 days or more past due as of June 30, 2005 or December 31, 2004, 2003 or 2002.
We classify any property acquired as a result of foreclosure on a mortgage loan as real
estate owned and record it at the lower of the unpaid principal balance or fair value at the date
of acquisition and subsequently carry the loan at the lower of cost or net realizable value. We
charge any required write-down of the loan to its net realizable value against the allowance for
credit losses at the time of foreclosure. We charge to expense any subsequent adjustments to net
realizable value. Upon foreclosure, Old Line Bank generally requires an appraisal of the property
and, thereafter, appraisals of the property on at least an annual basis and external inspections on
at least a quarterly basis. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we held no
real estate acquired as a result of foreclosure.
We apply the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114 (SFAS No.
114), Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, as amended by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 118 (SFAS No. 118), Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a
Loan-Income Recognition and Disclosure. SFAS No. 114 and SFAS No. 118 require that impaired
loans, which consist of all modified loans and other loans for which collection of all contractual
principal and interest is not probable, be measured based on the present value of expected future
cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or at the loans observable market
price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the measure of
the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, an impairment is recognized
through a valuation allowance and corresponding provision for credit losses. Old Line Bank
considers consumer loans as homogenous loans and thus does not apply the SFAS No. 114 impairment
test to these loans. We write off impaired loans when collection of the loan is doubtful.
37
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, we had no impaired or restructured
loans.
Bank owned life insurance
In June 2005, we remitted a one time premium payment of $3.3 million to a broker for an
insurance company for the purchase of Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) on the lives of our
executive officers Messrs. Cornelsen, and Burnett and Ms. Rush. We have submitted applications for
the BOLI and the officers have completed their physicals required for
the insurance. By November 1,
2005, we will enter into supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) agreements with the
executives. The SERP agreements will provide for future benefits to the executives. We will also
enter into separate agreements that will provide that upon the death of the executive, Old Line
Bank will split the insurance proceeds in excess of cash surrender value evenly between Old Line
Bank and the executive officers designated beneficiary.
Deposits
We seek deposits within our market area by paying competitive interest rates, offering high
quality customer service and using technology to deliver deposit services effectively.
At June 30, 2005, the deposit portfolio had grown to $106.0 million, a $17.0 million or 19.10%
increase over the December 31, 2004 level of $89.0 million. Non-interest bearing deposits grew
$1.5 million during the period from $25.4 million to $26.9 million while interest-bearing deposits
grew $15.6 million to $79.1 million from $63.5 million. Most of the growth in interest-bearing
deposits was in other time deposits, which increased from $36.4 million at December 31, 2004 to
$44.4 million at June 30, 2005 and money market and NOW accounts which grew from $16.5 million at
December 31, 2004 to $25.8 million at June 30, 2005. Our deposit base expanded due to increased
commercial relationships, a promotional certificate of deposit campaign in January 2005 that
increased other time deposits and increased activity and balances in real estate settlement
accounts at period end that increased money market, NOW, and non interest-bearing deposits.
At December 31, 2004, the deposit portfolio had grown to $89.0 million, a $19.7 million or
28.43% increase over the December 31, 2003 level of $69.3 million. Non-interest bearing deposits
grew $5.5 million during the period to $25.4 million from $19.9 million while interest-bearing
deposits grew $14.1 million to $63.5 million from $49.4 million. Increased business development
efforts, the addition of key personnel and promotional campaigns expanded the number of customers.
As a result, our non-interest and interest bearing deposit balances grew.
At December 31, 2003, deposits were $69.3 million, a $7 million increase over the December 31,
2002 level of $62.3 million. Non-interest bearing deposits grew $7.3 million during the period to
$19.9 million from $12.6 million, and interest-bearing deposits declined $219,062 to $49.4 million
from $49.6 million.
As a general practice, we do not purchase brokered deposits. During the periods reported, we
had no brokered deposits. As market conditions warrant and balance sheet needs dictate, we may
participate in the wholesale certificates of deposit market.
38
The following is a summary of the maturity distribution of certificates of deposit as of June
30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Deposit Maturity Distribution |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
to |
|
Over |
|
|
|
|
or |
|
Twelve |
|
Twelve |
|
|
|
|
Less |
|
Months |
|
Months |
|
Total |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than $100,000 |
|
$ |
3,131 |
|
|
$ |
4,635 |
|
|
$ |
16,494 |
|
|
$ |
24,260 |
|
Greater than or equal to $100,000 |
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
|
|
16,594 |
|
|
|
20,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,299 |
|
|
$ |
6,062 |
|
|
$ |
33,088 |
|
|
$ |
44,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
Old Line Bank has available lines of credit, including overnight federal funds and repurchase
agreements from its correspondent banks that totaled $9.5 million as of June 30, 2005 and as of
December 31, 2004. Old Line Bank has an additional secured line of credit from the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Atlanta that totaled $26.3 million as of June 30, 2005 and $22.7 million at December
31, 2004. We had borrowed $6 million as of June 30, 2005 and as of December 31, 2004.
Short-term borrowings consist of short-term promissory notes issued to Old Line Banks
customers and federal funds purchased. In 2004, Old Line Bank developed an enhancement to the
basic non-interest bearing demand deposit account for its commercial clients. This service
electronically sweeps excess funds from the customers account into an interest bearing Master Note
with Old Line Bank. These Master Notes reprice daily and have maturities of 270 days or less. At
June 30, 2005, Old line Bank had $8.9 million outstanding in these short term promissory notes with
an interest rate of 1.31%. At December 31, 2004, Old Line Bank had $3.6 million outstanding with
an average interest rate of 0.77%. At December 31, 2004, Old Line Bank also had $1 million
outstanding in overnight federal funds at 1.64% with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta.
At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, long-term borrowings were comprised of advances from
the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta totaling $6 million. Old Line Bank borrowed $4.0 million of
the $6.0 million in January 2001, currently pays interest only at 4.80%, and must repay the $4.0
million in January 2011. Interest is payable January 3, April 3, July 3, and October 3 of each
year. Effective January 3, 2002 and any payment date thereafter, the FHLB has the option to
convert the interest rate into a three (3) month LIBOR based floating rate.
In March 2004, Old Line Bank borrowed an additional $2 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank
of Atlanta. Old Line Bank pays interest only, currently at 1.79%, and must repay the $2.0 million
in March 2009. Interest is payable March 17, June 17, September 17 and December 17, of each year.
Effective March 16, 2006 and any payment date thereafter, the FHLB has the option to convert the
interest rate into a three (3) month LIBOR based floating rate.
Old Line Bank may not prepay the Federal Home Loan Bank loans prior to maturity without
incurring a significant prepayment penalty.
Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis and Interest Rate Risk Management
A principal objective of Old Line Banks asset/liability management policy is to minimize
exposure to changes in interest rates by an ongoing review of the maturity and re-pricing of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The Asset and Liability Committee of the
Board of Directors oversees this review.
The Asset and Liability Committee establishes policies to control interest rate sensitivity.
Interest rate sensitivity is the volatility of a banks earnings resulting from movements in market
interest rates. Management
39
monitors rate sensitivity in order to reduce vulnerability to interest rate fluctuations while
maintaining adequate capital levels and acceptable levels of liquidity. Monthly financial reports
supply management with information to evaluate and manage rate sensitivity and adherence to policy.
Old Line Banks asset/liability policys goal is to manage assets and liabilities in a manner that
stabilizes net interest income and net economic value within a broad range of interest rate
environments. Adjustments to the mix of assets and liabilities are made periodically in an effort
to achieve dependable, steady growth in net interest income regardless of the behavior of interest
rates in general.
As part of the interest rate risk sensitivity analysis, the Asset and Liability Committee
examines the extent to which Old Line Banks assets and liabilities are interest rate sensitive and
monitors the interest rate sensitivity gap. An interest rate sensitive asset or liability is one
that, within a defined time period, either matures or experiences an interest rate change in line
with general market rates. The interest rate sensitivity gap is the difference between
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities scheduled to mature or re-price within
such time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets
exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the
amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the interest rate sensitive assets. During a
period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income,
while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period
of declining interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest
income, while a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income. If re-pricing of
assets and liabilities were equally flexible and moved concurrently, the impact of any increase or
decrease in interest rates on net interest income would be minimal.
Old Line Bank currently has a negative gap over the short term, which suggests that the net
yield on interest earning assets may decrease during periods of rising interest rates. However, a
simple interest rate gap analysis by itself may not be an accurate indicator of how net interest
income will be affected by changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest-earning
assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by
changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates
may have a significant impact on net interest income. Although certain assets and liabilities may
have similar maturities or periods of re-pricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in
market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in
advance of changes in general market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag
behind changes in general market rates. In the event of a change in interest rate, prepayment and
early withdrawal levels also could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the
interest-rate gap. The ability of many borrowers to service their debts also may decrease in the
event of an interest rate increase.
The table below presents Old Line Banks interest rate sensitivity at June 30, 2005. Because
certain categories of securities and loans are prepaid before their maturity date even without
regard to interest rate fluctuations, we have made certain assumptions to calculate the expected
maturity of securities and loans.
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Sensitivity Analysis |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Maturing or Repricing |
|
|
Within |
|
4-12 |
|
1-5 |
|
Over |
|
|
|
|
3 Months |
|
Months |
|
Years |
|
5 Years |
|
Total |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Interest Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities |
|
$ |
646 |
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
14,195 |
|
|
$ |
1,841 |
|
|
$ |
16,871 |
|
Loans |
|
|
32,092 |
|
|
|
6,795 |
|
|
|
27,152 |
|
|
|
25,746 |
|
|
|
91,785 |
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
15,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets |
|
|
48,031 |
|
|
|
6,984 |
|
|
|
41,347 |
|
|
|
27,587 |
|
|
|
123,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction deposits |
|
|
17,210 |
|
|
|
8,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,815 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,850 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
5,299 |
|
|
|
6,062 |
|
|
|
33,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
25,459 |
|
|
|
17,617 |
|
|
|
36,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB Advances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
12,877 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing
liabilities |
|
|
38,336 |
|
|
|
19,617 |
|
|
|
36,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Gap |
|
$ |
9,695 |
|
|
$ |
(12,633 |
) |
|
$ |
5,310 |
|
|
$ |
27,587 |
|
|
$ |
29,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Gap |
|
$ |
9,695 |
|
|
$ |
(2,938 |
) |
|
$ |
2,372 |
|
|
$ |
29,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Gap/Total Assets |
|
|
7.17 |
% |
|
|
(2.17 |
%) |
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
22.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Liquidity
Our overall asset/liability strategy takes into account our need to maintain adequate
liquidity to fund asset growth and deposit runoff. Our management monitors the liquidity position
daily in conjunction with Federal Reserve guidelines. We have credit lines unsecured and secured
available from several correspondent banks totaling $9.5 million. Additionally, we may borrow
funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. We can use these credit facilities in
conjunction with the normal deposit strategies, which include pricing changes to increase deposits
as necessary. We can also sell or pledge available for sale investment securities to create
additional liquidity. From time to time we may sell or participate out loans to create additional
liquidity as required. Additional sources of liquidity include funds held in time deposits and
cash from the investment and loan portfolios.
Our immediate sources of liquidity are cash and due from banks and federal funds sold. As of
June 30, 2005, we had $3.7 million in cash and due from banks and $15.3 million in federal funds
sold and other overnight investments compared to $4.1 million in cash and due from banks and $5.2
million in federal funds sold and other overnight investments at December 31, 2004. As of
December 31, 2003 and 2002, we had $2.5 million and $1.4 million in cash and due from banks, and
$4.0 million and $5.6 million, respectively, in federal funds sold and other overnight investments.
41
Old Line Bank has sufficient liquidity to meet its loan commitments as well as fluctuations in
deposits. We usually retain maturing certificates of deposit as we offer competitive rates on
certificates of deposit. Management is not aware of any demands, trends, commitments, or events
that would result in Old Line Banks inability to meet anticipated or unexpected liquidity needs.
Capital
Our stockholders equity amounted to $13.9 million at June 30, 2005, $13.5 million at December
31, 2004, $12.8 million at December 31, 2003 and $5.7 million at December 31, 2002. We are
considered well capitalized under the risk-based capital guidelines adopted by the Federal
Reserve.
Stockholders equity increased from December 31, 2004 to June 30, 2005 because of net income
of $469,484, the $89,883 in proceeds after tax adjustment for stock options exercised less the
$105,158 in dividends paid in March and June and the $19,461 unrealized losses in available for
sale securities.
The following table shows Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s regulatory capital ratios and the
minimum capital ratios currently required by its banking regulator to be well capitalized. For a
discussion of these capital requirements, see Supervision and Regulation Capital Adequacy
Guidelines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
2,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
12,532 |
|
|
|
12,446 |
|
|
|
12,446 |
|
|
|
12,363 |
|
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: disallowed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tier 1 Capital |
|
$ |
14,038 |
|
|
$ |
13,205 |
|
|
$ |
13,585 |
|
|
$ |
12,898 |
|
|
$ |
5,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 2 Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Risk Based Capital |
|
$ |
14,911 |
|
|
$ |
13,840 |
|
|
$ |
14,330 |
|
|
$ |
13,445 |
|
|
$ |
5,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk weighted assets |
|
$ |
102,929 |
|
|
$ |
74,048 |
|
|
$ |
88,131 |
|
|
$ |
66,574 |
|
|
$ |
50,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
Capital Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk based capital ratio |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Total risk based capital ratio |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
Leverage ratio |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
42
Return on Average Assets and Average Equity
The ratio of net income to average equity and average assets and certain other ratios are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Average total assets |
|
$ |
122,610 |
|
|
$ |
93,299 |
|
|
$ |
99,325 |
|
|
$ |
81,732 |
|
|
$ |
64,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average equity |
|
|
13,639 |
|
|
|
12,672 |
|
|
|
13,031 |
|
|
|
9,193 |
|
|
|
5,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend payout ratio for period |
|
|
22.37 |
% |
|
|
32.19 |
% |
|
|
26.09 |
% |
|
|
17.07 |
% |
|
|
20.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets |
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average equity |
|
|
6.94 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
|
|
|
6.27 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
|
|
6.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
stockholders equity to
average total assets |
|
|
11.12 |
|
|
|
13.58 |
|
|
|
13.12 |
|
|
|
11.25 |
|
|
|
8.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Contingent Liabilities, and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in
the normal course of business. These financial instruments primarily may include commitments to
extend credit, lines of credit and standby letters of credit. In addition, Old Line Bancshares,
Inc. also has operating lease obligations. Old Line Bancshares, Inc. uses these financial
instruments to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments involve, to
varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, and liquidity risk. These do not represent
unusual risks and management does not anticipate any losses that would have a material effect on
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
43
Outstanding loan commitments and lines and letters of credit at June 30, 2005, December 31 of
2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Commitments to extend credit and available credit lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
3,687 |
|
|
$ |
2,896 |
|
|
$ |
1,395 |
|
|
$ |
2,385 |
|
Real estate-undisbursed development and construction |
|
|
13,305 |
|
|
|
7,419 |
|
|
|
3,931 |
|
|
|
3,582 |
|
Real estate-undisbursed home equity lines of credit |
|
|
4,185 |
|
|
|
3,426 |
|
|
|
2,686 |
|
|
|
3,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,177 |
|
|
$ |
13,741 |
|
|
$ |
8,012 |
|
|
$ |
9,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
1,611 |
|
|
$ |
1,307 |
|
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
$ |
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Old Line Bancshares, Inc. generally
requires collateral to support financial instruments with credit risk on the same basis as it does
for on-balance sheet instruments. The collateral is based on managements credit evaluation of the
counter party. Commitments generally have interest rates fixed at current market rates, expiration
dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Available credit lines
represent the unused portion of lines of credit previously extended and available to the customer
so long as there is no violation of any contractual condition. These lines generally have variable
interest rates. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, and
since it is unlikely that customers will draw upon their lines of credit in full at any time, the
total commitment amount or line of credit amount does not necessarily represent future cash
requirements. Each customers credit-worthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
We are not aware of any loss we would incur by funding our commitments or lines of credit.
Commitments for real estate development and construction, which totaled $13.3 million, or 62.74% of
the $21.2 million at June 30, 2005, are generally short-term and turn over rapidly, satisfying cash
requirements with principal repayments and from sales of the properties financed.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a
customer to a third party. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the
customer is the contract amount of the commitment. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of
credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
In general, loan commitments, credit lines and letters of credit are made on the same terms,
including with respect to collateral, as outstanding loans. We evaluate each customers
credit-worthiness and the collateral required on a case-by-case basis.
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations
and commitments. The following table presents, as of June 30, 2005, significant fixed and
determinable contractual obligations to third parties by payment date.
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
One to |
|
Three to |
|
Over |
|
|
one year |
|
three years |
|
five years |
|
five years |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
26,879 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
46,025 |
|
|
|
15,101 |
|
|
|
17,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
73,676 |
|
|
$ |
16,499 |
|
|
$ |
18,423 |
|
|
$ |
657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s operating lease obligations represent rental payments for
three branches and assumes we become obligated on the Crofton lease in March 2006. The
interest-bearing obligations include accrued interest. Purchase obligations represent estimated
obligations under agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally
binding. The purchase obligation amounts presented above primarily relate to estimated obligations
under data and item processing contracts, and accounts payable for goods and services received
through June 30, 2005.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
Below is a reconciliation of the FTE adjustments and the GAAP basis information presented in
this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds |
|
Investment |
|
Earning |
|
Total |
|
Net Interest |
|
Net Interest |
|
|
Sold |
|
Securities |
|
Assets |
|
Assets |
|
Income |
|
Spread |
GAAP Interest income |
|
$ |
180,989 |
|
|
$ |
309,042 |
|
|
$ |
3,080,292 |
|
|
$ |
3,080,292 |
|
|
$ |
2,198,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Equivalent adjustment |
|
|
2,014 |
|
|
|
36,215 |
|
|
|
38,229 |
|
|
|
38,229 |
|
|
|
38,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Equivalent interest income |
|
$ |
183,003 |
|
|
$ |
345,257 |
|
|
$ |
3,118,521 |
|
|
$ |
3,118,521 |
|
|
$ |
2,236,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP Interest yield |
|
|
2.73 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
|
5.07 |
% |
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
3.19 |
% |
Taxable Equivalent adjustment |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Equivalent interest yield |
|
|
2.76 |
% |
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
3.88 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds |
|
Investment |
|
Earning |
|
Total |
|
Net Interest |
|
Net Interest |
|
|
Sold |
|
Securities |
|
Assets |
|
Assets |
|
Income |
|
Spread |
GAAP Interest income |
|
$ |
20,836 |
|
|
$ |
337,115 |
|
|
$ |
2,241,458 |
|
|
$ |
2,241,458 |
|
|
$ |
1,677,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Equivalent adjustment |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
41,212 |
|
|
|
41,473 |
|
|
|
41,473 |
|
|
|
41,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Equivalent interest income |
|
$ |
21,097 |
|
|
$ |
378,327 |
|
|
$ |
2,282,931 |
|
|
$ |
2,282,931 |
|
|
$ |
1,719,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP Interest yield |
|
|
0.98 |
% |
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
3.26 |
% |
Taxable Equivalent adjustment |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
0.42 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Equivalent interest yield |
|
|
0.99 |
% |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
5.22 |
% |
|
|
4.92 |
% |
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds |
|
Investment |
|
Earning |
|
Total |
|
Net Interest |
|
Net Interest |
|
|
Sold |
|
Securities |
|
Assets |
|
Assets |
|
Income |
|
Spread |
GAAP interest income |
|
$ |
50,936 |
|
|
$ |
671,498 |
|
|
$ |
4,889,855 |
|
|
$ |
4,889,855 |
|
|
$ |
3,726,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent adjustment |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
72,836 |
|
|
|
73,268 |
|
|
|
73,268 |
|
|
|
73,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent interest income |
|
$ |
51,368 |
|
|
$ |
744,334 |
|
|
$ |
4,963,123 |
|
|
$ |
4,963,123 |
|
|
$ |
3,799,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP interest yield |
|
|
1.26 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
|
4.93 |
% |
|
|
3.99 |
% |
|
|
3.44 |
% |
Taxable equivalent adjustment |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
0.08 |
% |
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent interest yield |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
|
|
3.76 |
% |
|
|
5.31 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
4.07 |
% |
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds |
|
Investment |
|
Earning |
|
Total |
|
Net Interest |
|
Net Interest |
|
|
Sold |
|
Securities |
|
Assets |
|
Assets |
|
Income |
|
Spread |
GAAP interest income |
|
$ |
82,300 |
|
|
$ |
610,100 |
|
|
$ |
4,058,012 |
|
|
$ |
4,058,012 |
|
|
$ |
2,799,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,127 |
|
|
|
71,127 |
|
|
|
71,127 |
|
|
|
71,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent interest income |
|
$ |
82,300 |
|
|
$ |
681,227 |
|
|
$ |
4,129,139 |
|
|
$ |
4,129,139 |
|
|
$ |
2,870,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP interest yield |
|
|
1.03 |
% |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
5.31 |
% |
|
|
4.97 |
% |
|
|
3.66 |
% |
|
|
3.02 |
% |
Taxable equivalent adjustment |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.43 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
0.08 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent interest yield |
|
|
1.03 |
% |
|
|
4.07 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
5.05 |
% |
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds |
|
Investment |
|
Earning |
|
Total |
|
Net Interest |
|
Net Interest |
|
|
Sold |
|
Securities |
|
Assets |
|
Assets |
|
Income |
|
Spread |
GAAP interest income |
|
$ |
109,880 |
|
|
$ |
813,522 |
|
|
$ |
3,788,040 |
|
|
$ |
3,788,040 |
|
|
$ |
2,291,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,762 |
|
|
|
9,762 |
|
|
|
9,762 |
|
|
|
9,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent interest income |
|
$ |
109,880 |
|
|
$ |
823,284 |
|
|
$ |
3,797,802 |
|
|
$ |
3,797,802 |
|
|
$ |
2,300,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP interest yield |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
6.32 |
% |
|
|
5.89 |
% |
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
3.17 |
% |
Taxable equivalent adjustment |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent interest yield |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
|
|
5.19 |
% |
|
|
6.33 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
3.84 |
% |
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices and Seasonality
The financial statements and related data presented herein have been prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles which require the measurement of financial position
and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative
purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.
Unlike industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial
institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on
a financial institutions performance than the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest
rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the price of goods
and services, and may frequently reflect government policy initiatives or economic
46
factors not measured by price index. As discussed above, we strive to manage our interest
sensitive assets and liabilities in order to offset the effects of rate changes and inflation.
Application Of Critical Accounting Policies
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and follow general practices within the industry in which
we operate. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions,
and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the date of
the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could
reflect different estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a
greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and as such have a greater
possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported.
Estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be
recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the financial
statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established,
or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event. Carrying
assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial statement volatility.
The fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and
liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other third-party sources,
when available.
The most significant accounting policies that we follow are presented in Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the
other financial statement notes and in this financial review, provide information on how
significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are
determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement
amounts to the methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, management has
identified the determination of the provision for loan losses as the accounting area that requires
the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new
information becomes available.
The provision for loan losses represents managements best estimate of the losses known and
inherent in the loan portfolio that are both probable and reasonable to estimate, based on, among
other factors, prior loss experience, volume and type of lending conducted, estimated value of any
underlying collateral, economic conditions (particularly as such conditions relate to Old Line
Banks market area), regulatory guidance, peer statistics, managements judgment, past due loans in
the loan portfolio, loan charge off experience and concentrations of risk (if any). Determining
the amount of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it
requires significant estimates, assumptions, and judgments. The loan portfolio also represents the
largest asset type on the consolidated balance sheets.
The evaluation of the adequacy of the provision for loan losses is based upon loan categories
except for delinquent loans and loans for which management has knowledge about possible credit
problems of the borrower or knowledge of problems with loan collateral, which are evaluated
separately and assigned loss amounts based upon the evaluation. Loss ratios are applied to each
category of loan other than commercial loans (including letters of credit and unused commitments),
where the loans are further divided by risk rating and loss ratios are applied by risk rating, to
determine estimated loss amounts. Categories of loans are installment and other consumer loans
(other than boat loans), boat loans, mortgage loans (commercial real estate, residential real
estate and real estate construction) and commercial loans.
Management has significant discretion in making the judgments inherent in the determination of
the provision and allowance for loan losses, including in connection with the valuation of
collateral and the financial condition of the borrower, and in establishing loss ratios and risk
ratings. The establishment of allowance factors is a continuing exercise and allowance factors may
change over time, resulting in an increase or decrease in the amount of the provision or allowance
based upon the same volume and classification of loans.
Changes in allowance factors or in managements interpretation of those factors will have a
direct impact on the amount of the provision, and a corresponding effect on income and assets.
Also, errors in managements perception and assessment of the allowance factors could result in the
allowance not being adequate to cover losses in the portfolio, and may result in additional
provisions or charge-offs, which would adversely affect income and
47
capital. For additional information regarding the allowance for loan losses, see the
Provision for Loan Losses section of this financial review.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting pronouncements that have recently been approved follow. We do not expect these
statements to have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company.
FASB Statement No. 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (revised 2004) Share-Based
Payment, establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its
equity instruments for goods or services. This Statement eliminates the alternative to use
Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25s intrinsic value method of accounting that was provided in
Statement 123 as originally issued. Under Opinion 25, issuing stock options to employees generally
results in recognition of no compensation costs. This Statement requires entities to recognize the
cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the
grant-date fair value of those awards. In addition, this Statement amends FASB Statement No. 95,
Statement of Cash Flows, to require that excess tax benefits be reported as financing cash inflow
rather than as a reduction of taxes paid. This statement is effective for the Company for the
first interim reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005.
AICPA Statement of Position No. 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired
in a Transfer, prohibits the carrying over of valuation allowances in loans and securities
acquired in a transfer. At transfer, the assets are to be recorded at the total cash flows
expected to be collected. The SOP is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2004.
48
BUSINESS OF OLD LINE BANCSHARES, INC. AND OLD LINE BANK
Business of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland in April 11, 2003 to serve as the
holding company of Old Line Bank.
On May 22, 2003, the stockholders of Old Line Bank approved the reorganization of Old Line
Bank into a holding company structure. The reorganization became effective at 12:01 a.m. on
September 15, 2003. In connection with the reorganization, (i) Old Line Bank became our
wholly-owned subsidiary and (ii) each outstanding share (or fraction thereof) of Old Line Bank
common stock was converted into one share (or fraction thereof) of our common stock, and the former
holders of Old Line Bank common stock became the holders of all our outstanding shares.
Our primary business is owning all of the capital stock of Old Line Bank. We also have an
approximately $732,500 equity investment in a real estate investment limited liability company
named Pointer Ridge Office Investment, LLC. We own 50% of Pointer Ridge. Frank Lucente, one of
our directors and a director of Old Line Bank, controls twenty five percent of Pointer Ridge and
controls the manager of Pointer Ridge. The purpose of Pointer Ridge is to acquire, own, hold for
profit, sell, assign, transfer, operate, lease, develop, mortgage, refinance, pledge and otherwise
deal with real property located at the intersection of Pointer Ridge Road and Route 301 in Bowie,
Maryland. Pointer Ridge has acquired the property and plans to construct a commercial office
building containing approximately 40,000 square feet. We plan to lease approximately 50% of this
building for our main office (moving our existing main office from Waldorf, Maryland) and a branch
of Old Line Bank. We anticipate moving to our new headquarters in the first quarter of 2006.
Business of Old Line Bank
General
Old Line Bank is a trust company chartered under Subtitle 2 of Title 3 of the Financial
Institutions Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland. Old Line Bank was originally chartered in
1989 as a national bank under the title Old Line National Bank. In June 2002, Old Line Bank
converted to a Maryland-chartered trust company exercising the powers of a commercial bank, and
received a Certificate of Authority to do business from the Maryland Commissioner of Financial
Regulation.
Old Line Bank converted from a national bank to a Maryland-chartered trust company to reduce
certain federal supervisory and application fees that were then applicable to Old Line National
Bank and to have a local primary regulator. Prior to the conversion, Old Line Banks primary
regulator was the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Currently, Old Line Banks primary
regulator is the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation.
Old Line Bank does not exercise trust powers and its regulatory structure is the same as a
Maryland chartered commercial bank. Old Line Bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System and
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insures its deposits.
In June 2003, Old Line Bank completed a public offering of 299,000 shares of common stock at
an offering price of $25 per share. The $6.9 million in net offering proceeds provided Old Line
Bank the capital necessary to retain higher percentages of loans that it previously participated to
other financial institutions. It also allowed Old Line Bank to maintain its well-capitalized
status with the bank regulatory authorities. We have also used these funds in connection with our
expansion efforts.
Old Line Bank is headquartered in Waldorf, Maryland, approximately 10 miles south of Andrews
Air Force Base and 25 miles southeast of Washington, D.C. We engage in a general commercial
banking business, making various types of loans and accepting deposits. We market our financial
services to small to medium sized businesses, entrepreneurs, professionals, consumers and high net
worth clients. Our current primary market area is the suburban Maryland (Washington, D.C. suburbs)
counties of Prince Georges and Charles. We also target customers throughout the greater
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Our branch offices generally
operate six days a week from 8:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. on weekdays
and from 8:00 a.m. until noon on Saturday. None of our branch offices
are open on Sunday.
49
Our principal source of revenue is interest income and fees generated by lending and investing
funds on deposit. We typically balance the loan and investment portfolio towards loans. Generally
speaking, loans earn more attractive returns than investments and are a key source of product cross
sales and customer referrals. Our loan and investment strategies balance the need to maintain
adequate liquidity via excess cash or federal funds sold with opportunities to leverage our capital
appropriately.
Location and Market Area
We consider our current primary market area to consist of the suburban Maryland (Washington,
D.C. suburbs) counties of Prince Georges and Charles. The economy in our current primary market
area has focused on real estate development, high technology, retail and the government sector.
Our corporate headquarters and two of our branch offices are located in Waldorf, Maryland in
Charles County. Just 15 miles south of the Washington Capital Beltway, Charles County is the
gateway to Southern Maryland. The northern part of Charles County is the development district
where the commercial, residential and business growth is focused. Waldorf, White Plains and the
planned community of St. Charles are located here.
A critical component of our strategic plan is the future growth of Prince Georges County,
which wraps around the eastern boundary of Washington, D.C. and offers urban, suburban and rural
settings for employers and residents. Several regional, national and international airports are
less than an hour away, as is Baltimore. We currently have two branch locations in Prince Georges
County including our newest branch, which opened in 2002. In the first quarter of 2006, we expect
to move our headquarters location from Waldorf, Maryland to the Pointer Ridge location in Bowie,
Maryland in Prince Georges County. We also plan to establish a new branch at the Pointer Ridge
location. In August 2005, we opened a loan production office in College Park, Prince Georges
County. In 2008, we intend to open a branch in the office building in which the loan production
office is located.
We also plan to expand to Anne Arundel County through the opening of a branch at 1641 State
Route 3 North in Crofton. Anne Arundel County borders the Chesapeake Bay and is situated in the
high-tech corridor between Baltimore and Washington, D.C. With over 534 miles of shoreline, it
provides waterfront living to many residential communities. Annapolis, the State Capital and home
to the Naval Academy, and Baltimore/Washington International Airport (BWI), are located in Anne
Arundel County. Anne Arundel County has one of the strongest economies in the State of Maryland
and its unemployment rate is consistently below the national average. The economy in Anne Arundel
County consists of over 13,000 businesses with focuses on Internet-based services, high technology,
telecommunications, distribution and technical support services.
Lending Activities
General. Our primary market focus is on making loans to small and medium size businesses,
entrepreneurs, professionals, consumers and high net worth clients in our primary market area. Our
lending activities consist generally of short to medium term commercial business loans, commercial
real estate loans, real estate construction loans, home equity loans and consumer installment
loans, both secured and unsecured. As a niche-lending product, we provide luxury boat financing to
individuals, who generally tend to be high net-worth individuals. These boats are generally Coast
Guard documented and have a homeport of record in the Chesapeake Bay or its tributaries.
The following table summarizes the composition of the loan portfolio by dollar amount and
percentages at the dates indicated:
50
Loan
Portfolio
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
39,857 |
|
|
|
43.43 |
% |
|
$ |
34,300 |
|
|
|
41.86 |
% |
|
$ |
26,859 |
|
|
|
44.87 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
3,885 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
|
|
|
6,551 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
Residential |
|
|
11,686 |
|
|
|
12.73 |
|
|
|
8,530 |
|
|
|
10.41 |
|
|
|
3,641 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
13,205 |
|
|
|
14.39 |
|
|
|
11,190 |
|
|
|
13.66 |
|
|
|
8,251 |
|
|
|
13.78 |
|
Installment |
|
|
23,152 |
|
|
|
25.22 |
|
|
|
21,356 |
|
|
|
26.07 |
|
|
|
19,355 |
|
|
|
32.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,785 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
81,927 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
59,868 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net deferred loan (fees) and costs |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
91,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Policies and Administration. We have adopted a comprehensive lending policy,
which includes stringent underwriting standards for all types of loans. Our lending staff follows
pricing guidelines established periodically by our management team. In an effort to manage risk,
prior to funding, the loan committee consisting of the President, Chief Credit Officer, Chief
Lending Officer and six members of the Board of Directors must approve by a majority vote all
credit decisions in excess of a lending officers lending authority. Management believes that it
employs experienced lending officers, secures appropriate collateral and carefully monitors the
financial conditions of its borrowers and the concentration of loans in the portfolio.
In addition to the normal repayment risks, all loans in the portfolio are subject to the state
of the economy and the related effects on the borrower and/or the real estate market. With the
exception of loans provided to finance luxury boats, generally longer-term loans have periodic
interest rate adjustments and/or call provisions. Senior management monitors the loan portfolio
closely to ensure that we minimize past due loans and that we swiftly deal with potential problem
loans.
In addition to the internal business processes employed in the credit administration area, Old
Line Bank retains an outside, independent credit review firm to review the loan portfolio. This
firm performs a detailed annual review and an interim update at least once a year. We use the
results of the firms report to validate our internal loan ratings and we review their commentary
on specific loans and on our loan administration activities in order to improve our operations.
Commercial Business Lending. Our commercial business lending consists of lines of credit,
revolving credit facilities, accounts receivable financing, term loans, equipment loans, SBA loans,
stand-by letters of credit and unsecured loans. We originate commercial loans for any business
purpose including the financing of leasehold improvements and equipment, the carrying of accounts
receivable, general working capital, contract administration and acquisition activities. We have a
diverse client base and we do not have a concentration of these types of loans in any specific
industry segment. We generally secure commercial business loans with accounts receivable,
equipment, deeds of trust and other collateral such as marketable securities, cash value of life
insurance, and time deposits at Old Line Bank.
Commercial business loans have a higher degree of risk than residential mortgage loans because
the availability of funds for repayment generally depends on the success of the business. They may
also involve higher average balances, increased difficulty monitoring and a higher risk of default
since their repayment generally depends on the successful operation of the borrowers business. To
help mitigate this risk, we typically limit these loans to proven businesses and we generally
obtain appropriate collateral and personal guarantees from the
51
borrowers principal owners and
monitor the financial condition of the business. For loans in excess of $250,000,
monitoring usually includes a review of the borrowers tax returns and financial statements on
an annual basis.
Commercial Real Estate Lending. We finance commercial real estate for our clients, usually
for owner occupied properties. We generally will finance owner-occupied commercial real estate at
a maximum loanto-value of 80%. Our underwriting policies and processes focus on the clients
ability to repay the loan as well as an assessment of the underlying real estate. We originate
commercial real estate loans on a fixed rate or adjustable rate basis. Usually, these rates adjust
during a three, five or seven year time period based on the then current treasury or prime rate
index. Repayment terms include amortization schedules ranging from three years to a maximum of 25
years with principal and interest payments due monthly and with all remaining principal due at
maturity.
Commercial real estate lending entails significant additional risks as compared with
residential mortgage lending. Risks inherent in managing a commercial real estate portfolio relate
to sudden or gradual drops in property values as well as changes in the economic climate that may
detrimentally impact the borrowers ability to repay. We attempt to mitigate these risks by
carefully underwriting these loans. Our underwriting generally includes an analysis of the
borrowers capacity to repay, the current collateral value, a cash flow analysis and review of the
character of the borrower and current and prospective conditions in the market. We generally limit
loans in this category to 75%-80% of the value of the property and require personal and/or
corporate guarantees. For loans of this type in excess of $250,000, we monitor the financial
condition and operating performance of the borrower through a review of annual tax returns and
updated financial statements. In addition, we will meet with the borrower and/or perform site
visits as required.
Real Estate Construction Lending. This segment of our loan portfolio is predominately
residential in nature and is comprised of loans of short duration, meaning maturities typically of
nine months or less. Residential houses under construction and the underlying land for which the
loan was obtained secure the construction loans. All of these loans are concentrated in our
primary market area.
Construction lending entails significant risks compared with residential mortgage lending.
These risks involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers with funds advanced
upon the security of the land or home under construction, which is estimated prior to the
completion of the home. Thus, it is more difficult to evaluate accurately the total loan funds
required to complete a project and related loan-to-value ratios. To mitigate these risks, we
generally limit loan amounts to 80% of appraised values and obtain first lien positions on the
property. We generally only offer real estate construction financing to experienced builders and
individuals who have demonstrated the ability to obtain a permanent loan take-out. We also
perform a complete analysis of the borrower and the home under construction. This analysis
includes a review of the cost to construct, the borrowers ability to obtain a permanent take
out, the cash flow available to support the debt payments and construction costs in excess of loan
proceeds, and the value of the collateral. During construction, we advance funds on these loans
on a percentage of completion basis. We inspect each project as needed prior to advancing funds
during the term of the construction loan.
Residential Real Estate Lending. We offer a variety of consumer-oriented residential real
estate loans. The bulk of our portfolio is made up of home equity loans to individuals with a loan
to value not exceeding 85%. We also offer fixed rate home improvement loans. Our home equity and
home improvement loan portfolio gives us a diverse client base. Although most of these loans are
in our primary market area, the diversity of the individual loans in the portfolio reduces our
potential risk. Usually, we secure our home equity loans and lines of credit with a security
interest in the borrowers primary or secondary residence. Our initial underwriting includes an
analysis of the borrowers debt/income ratio that generally may not exceed 40%, collateral value,
length of employment and prior credit history.
Consumer Installment Lending.
Luxury Boats Loans. We offer various types of secured and unsecured consumer loans.
A primary aspect of our consumer lending is our financing for luxury boat purchases ($22.4 million
or 97.66% of the consumer loans, excluding consumer real estate, and 24.63% of gross loans at June
30, 2005). Our average loan in the luxury boat loan category is approximately $150,000, with an
18-year term and a fixed interest rate. Our internal analysis and industry statistics indicate
that the average life of these loans is approximately 42 months as the purchaser either
52
trades or sells the vessel.
These loans entail greater risks than residential mortgage lending because the boats that
secure these loans are depreciable assets. Further, payment on these loans depends on the
borrowers continuing financial stability. Job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy may
adversely impact the borrowers ability to pay. To mitigate these risks, we have more stringent
underwriting standards for these loans than for other installment loans. As a general guideline,
the individuals debt service should not exceed 36% of their gross income, they must own their
home, have stability of employment and residency, verifiable liquidity, satisfactory prior credit
repayment history and the loan to value ratio may not exceed 85%. To ascertain value, we generally
receive a survey of the boat from a qualified surveyor and/or a current purchase agreement and
compare the determined value to published industry values.
The majority of these boats are United States Coast Guard documented vessels and we obtain a
lien on the vessel with a first preferred ship mortgage, where applicable, or a security interest
on the title. As a result of these stringent guidelines, this segment of our portfolio has
experienced minimal delinquency. Since inception of the portfolio in 1997, only two accounts have
experienced 30-day delinquency with total losses in the portfolio of $20,000 from one account.
Historically, we have generally paid a fee to a broker to originate a boat loan. We will
continue to pay brokers for boat loans and will originate boat loans for our portfolio through Old
Line Marine. We do not plan to increase our boat loan portfolio because of Old Line Marine.
Personal and Household Loans. We also make consumer loans for personal, family or
household purposes as a convenience to our customer base. However, these loans are not a focus of
our lending activities. As a general guideline, a consumers total debt service should not exceed
40% of their gross income. The underwriting standards for consumer loans include a determination
of the applicants payment history on other debts and an assessment of his or her ability to meet
existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan.
Consumer loans may present greater credit risk than residential mortgage loans because many
consumer loans are unsecured or are secured by rapidly depreciating assets. Repossessed collateral
for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding
loan balance because of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation. Consumer loan
collections depend on the borrowers continuing financial stability. If a borrower suffers
personal financial difficulties, the loan may not be repaid. Also, various federal and state laws,
including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount we can recover on such loans.
However, in our opinion, many of these risks do not apply to the luxury boat loan portfolio due to
the credit quality and liquidity of the borrowers.
Lending Limit. As of June 30, 2005, our legal lending limit for loans to one borrower was
approximately $2.1 million. As part of our risk management strategy, we may attempt to participate
a portion of larger loans to other financial institutions. This strategy allows Old Line Bank to
maintain customer relationships yet reduce credit exposure. However, this strategy may not always
be available.
Old Line Marine
In February 2005, we established Old Line Marine as a division of Old Line Bank to serve as a
boat loan broker and to originate loans for Old Line Bank. The primary loan origination location
for this division is Annapolis, Maryland. We also service the Norfolk, Virginia market. We
conduct secondary market activity in our marine division as a broker and we earn a fee.
53
Investments and Funding
We balance our liquidity needs based on loan and deposit growth via the investment portfolio
and purchased funds. It is our goal to provide adequate liquidity to support our loan growth. In
the event we have excess liquidity, we use investments to generate positive earnings. In the event
deposit growth does not fully support our loan growth, we can use a combination of investment
sales, federal funds and other purchased funds to augment our funding position.
We actively monitor our investment portfolio and the majority of the portfolio is generally
classified as available for sale. In general, under such a classification, we may sell
investment instruments as management deems appropriate. On a monthly basis, we mark to market
the investment portfolio via equity as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
115 (SFAS 115). Additionally, we use the investment portfolio to balance our asset and liability
position. We invest in fixed rate or floating rate instruments as necessary to reduce our interest
rate risk exposure.
Other Banking Products
We offer our customers safe deposit boxes, wire transfer services, debit cards, ATM machines
at three of our branch locations and credit cards through a third party processor. Additionally,
we provide Internet banking capabilities to our customers. With our Internet banking service, our
customers may view their accounts on-line and electronically remit bill payments. Our commercial
account services include direct deposit of payroll for our commercial clients employees and an
overnight sweep service.
Deposit Activities
Deposits are the major source of our funding. We offer a broad array of deposit products that
include demand, NOW, money market and savings accounts as well as certificates of deposit. We
believe that we pay competitive rates on our interest bearing deposits. As a relationship-oriented
organization, we generally seek to obtain deposit relationships with our loan clients.
As our overall balance sheet position dictates, we may become more or less competitive in our
interest rate structure. To date, we have not used brokered deposits.
Competition
The banking business is highly competitive. We compete with other commercial banks, savings
associations, credit unions, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, securities
brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market mutual funds and other financial institutions
operating in our primary market area and elsewhere.
We believe that we have effectively leveraged our talents, contacts and location to achieve a
strong financial position. However, our primary market area is highly competitive and heavily
branched. Competition in our primary market area for loans to small and medium sized businesses,
entrepreneurs, professionals and high net worth clients is intense, and pricing is important. Most
of our competitors have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we do and offer
extensive and established branch networks and other services that we do not offer. Moreover,
larger institutions operating in our primary market area have access to borrowed funds at a lower
rate than is available to us. Deposit competition also is strong among institutions in our primary
market area. As a result, it is possible that to remain competitive we may need to pay above
market rates for deposits.
Employees
As of July 31, 2005, Old Line Bank had 36 full time and four part time employees. No
collective bargaining unit represents any of our employees and we believe that relations with our
employees are good. Old Line Bancshares, Inc. has no employees.
54
Properties
We acquired our headquarters, which is a full service banking branch and office facility
located at 2995 Crain Highway in Waldorf, Maryland, in 1998 for $750,000, renovated the space at a
cost of approximately $716,000, and moved our main office into it from our branch office located at
12080 Old Line Centre in Waldorf, Maryland. As an accommodation to the seller, we purchased this
facility subject to a 99-year lease that we paid in full. In 2004, we exercised the option to
purchase the facility for $1.00. As further described below, we
anticipate moving our headquarters from this location to the
intersection of Pointers Ridge Road and Route 301 in Bowie, Maryland
during the first quarter of 2006. We intend to retain our branch
office at 2995 Crain Highway and plan to lease the remainder of the
space in this building. We have not currently identified a tenant
interested for this space.
We continue to maintain a branch operation at the Old Line Centre location, and have done so
since 1989.
The lease, which commenced in August 1999, is a ten-year lease with two, five-year options.
Payment terms on the lease are triple net, at $4,633 monthly with 1.5% annual increases.
In 1995, we opened a branch at 15808 Livingston Road in Accokeek, Maryland in Prince Georges
County in leased facilities. In March 2003, we purchased the Accokeek location for $155,877.
Our Clinton, Maryland, Prince Georges County branch, located at 7801 Old Branch Avenue, was
opened in September 2002 in leased space. Exclusive of the $825 in monthly rent, we pay no
utilities or other expenses associated with this facility. The lease incorporates increases in
monthly rent beginning in October 2006 to $2,301, in October 2008 to $2,685 and 1.5% every year
thereafter. The lease term is for a period of ten years, with three, five-year options.
Our loan production office in College Park, Prince Georges County, Maryland, is located in
leased space on the fourth floor of a four story building located at 9658 Baltimore Avenue. The
lease, which commenced in August 2005, is for two years and six months. Payment terms on the lease
are triple net, at $2,525.00 monthly, with 3% annual increases. We have also leased space for a
new branch on the first floor of this building commencing January 2008 at $5,000 monthly (triple
net) with 3% annual increases. The term for this space is 10 years with two five year renewal
terms.
In the first quarter or second quarter of 2006, Old Line Bank plans to open a new branch in
Crofton, Maryland in Anne Arundel County, located at 1641 Route 3 North, Crofton, Maryland. On
July 7, 2004, Old Line Bank executed a lease agreement with Ridgley I, LLC, an unrelated entity, to
lease 2,420 square feet of office space for a period of 10 years with three additional renewals for
terms of 5 years. The lease commences 120 days after the landlord completes construction or the
day Old Line Bank opens for business, whichever is sooner. Payment terms on the lease are $6,353
monthly with 2.5% annual increases. In addition to the monthly rent, we will pay any increase in
taxes during the term of the lease and utilities. The space is to be located in newly constructed
space at the end of an existing strip center.
In the first quarter of 2006, we plan to move our main office facility from Waldorf, Maryland
to the intersection of Pointer Ridge Road and U.S. Route 301 in Bowie, Maryland in Prince Georges
County and to establish a branch in this facility. Pointer Ridge Office Investment, LLC, an entity
50% owned by us and in which we currently have an approximately
$732,500 investment, owns this
property. Frank Lucente, a director of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and Old Line Bank controls 25% of
Pointer Ridge and controls the manager of Pointer Ridge. Pointer Ridge has acquired the property
and plans to construct a commercial office building containing approximately 40,000 square feet.
We plan to lease approximately 50% of this building for our main office (moving our existing main
office from Waldorf, Maryland) and a branch of Old Line Bank. We anticipate moving to our new
headquarters in the first quarter of 2006.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our
normal course of business. As of the date of this prospectus, we are not aware of any material
pending litigation matters.
55
MANAGEMENT
Directors and Officers
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s directors and executive officers and Old Line Banks directors and
executive officers are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
Name |
|
Age(1) |
|
Position |
|
Since(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles A. Bongar
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Director of Old
Line Bancshares,
Inc. and Old Line
Bank
|
|
|
1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig E. Clark
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Chairman of the
Board of Directors
of Old Line
Bancshares, Inc.
and of Old Line
Bank
|
|
1988(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Cornelsen
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
President and Chief
Executive Officer
of Old Line
Bancshares, Inc.
and Old Line Bank
and Director of Old
Line Bancshares,
Inc. and Old Line
Bank
|
|
|
1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel W. Deming
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Director of Old
Line Bancshares,
Inc. and Old Line
Bank
|
|
|
1992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Dent
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
Director of Old
Line Bancshares,
Inc. and Old Line
Bank
|
|
|
1988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nancy L. Gasparovic
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Director of Old
Line Bancshares,
Inc. and Old Line
Bank
|
|
|
1993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Lucente, Jr.
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Vice Chairman of
the Board of
Directors of Old
Line Bancshares,
Inc. and Old Line
Bank
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gail D. Manuel
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Director of Old
Line Bancshares,
Inc. and Old Line
Bank
|
|
|
1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John D. Mitchell, Jr.
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Director of Old
Line Bancshares,
Inc. and Old Line
Bank
|
|
|
1992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory S. Proctor
Jr.
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Director of Old
Line Bancshares,
Inc. and Old Line
Bank
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of July 31, 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. was incorporated in April 2003. This column indicates the
date on which each of the directors became a member of the Board of Directors of Old Line
Bank. Each director has been a director of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. since its
incorporation other than Mr. Proctor, who became a director in September 2004. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Clark. has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Old Line Bank since 1994
and of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. since its incorporation in April 2003. |
Messrs. Bongar and Lucente and Ms. Gasparovics terms as directors expire at the 2006 annual
meeting of the stockholders of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
Messrs. Cornelsen, Deming, Dent and Mitchells terms as directors expire at the 2007 annual
meeting of the stockholders of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
Messrs. Clark and Proctor along with Ms. Manuels terms as directors expire at the 2008 annual
meeting of the stockholders of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
Charles A. Bongar, Jr., is a lawyer with the firm of Andrews, Bongar, Starkey & Claggett, P.A.
The firm has an office in Waldorf, Maryland. He has practiced law since 1972 and specializes in
real estate transactions, estate probate, and personal injury cases. Mr. Bongar resides in
LaPlata, Maryland.
Craig E. Clark is President of Waldorf Carpets, Inc., a wholesale and retail flooring company,
which he established in 1969. Mr. Clark is a founder of Old Line Bank. Mr. Clark resides in
Lusby, Maryland.
James W. Cornelsen is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
and Old Line Bank. He has 29 years of commercial banking experience. Prior to joining Old Line
Bank, Mr. Cornelsen was a Senior Vice President at Sequoia National Bank and Vice President of
Commercial Lending at Citizens Bank of Maryland. Mr. Cornelsen resides in LaPlata, Maryland.
Daniel W. Deming is a Director of Deming Associates, Inc., in Accokeek, Maryland. He also
serves as a
56
Director of Kanawha Roxalana Company, in West Virginia and is a Director of Livingston, Ltd.
All three of these companies are engaged in various aspects of real estate. Mr. Deming resides in
Accokeek, Maryland.
James F. Dent is owner and operator of a State Farm Insurance Agency that he established in
1961. He resides in LaPlata, Maryland.
Nancy L. Gasparovic, is owner and operator of Title Professionals, Ltd., a real estate
settlement company in LaPlata, Maryland. Ms. Gasparovic resides in Issue, Maryland.
Frank Lucente, Jr. is Chairman of Chesapeake Custom Homes, a Suburban Maryland residential
home builder and developer, and President of Lucente Enterprises, a land development holding
company. Mr. Lucente resides in Tequesta, Florida.
Gail D. Manuel is owner and Director of Trinity Memorial Gardens and Mausoleum in Waldorf,
Maryland. She is a past Board of Director of the Charles County Chamber of Commerce and past
President of Charles County Zonta Club. She resides in Welcome, Maryland.
John D. Mitchell, Jr. is President of JCV, Inc. a petroleum equipment company located in
Hughesville, Maryland. Mr. Mitchell resides in LaPlata, Maryland.
Gregory S. Proctor Jr. is President and Chief Executive Officer of G.S. Proctor & Associates,
Inc., a Maryland registered lobbying and consulting firm, which he established in 1995. He resides
in Upper Marlboro, Maryland.
The directors of Old Line Bancshares are divided into three classes, with each class
containing one-third of the total number of directors, as near as is possible, and one of the three
classes expiring each year. Each director serves for a term ending on the date of the third annual
meeting of stockholders following the annual meeting at which such director was elected. Pursuant
to the charter of Old Line Bancshares, Inc., the term of office of one of the three classes of
directors expires each year.
The directors of Old Line Bank are also divided into three classes, with each class containing
one-third of the total number of directors, as near as is possible, and one of the three classes
expiring each year. Directors of Old Line Bank serve the same term of office as their directorship
with Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
Executive Officers Who are Not Directors and Key Employees
Executive Officers
Joseph E. Burnett, 59, joined Old Line Bank as a Senior Vice President and Chief Lending
Officer in August 2001. He is also a Senior Vice President of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. He has
over 39 years of banking experience in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area specializing in
commercial transactions. Prior to joining Old Line Bank, Mr. Burnett was a Senior Vice President
in Commercial Lending at Farmers Bank for two years (1999-2001) and at Suburban Bank for twelve
years (1987-1999). Mr. Burnett resides in Dunkirk, Maryland. One
of our new commercial lenders, Ms. Sandi Burnett, is the
sister-in-law of Mr. Burnett.
Christine M. Rush, 49, joined Old Line Bank in 1998. She is a Senior Vice President, the
Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Credit Officer and the Secretary of Old Line Bank. She is also
a Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and the Secretary of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
Prior to joining Old Line Bank, Ms. Rush was a Vice President in Commercial Lending and Cash
Management at Signet Bank. She has over 27 years banking and financial management experience. Ms.
Rush resides in LaPlata, Maryland.
Key Employees
Jeffrey Franklin, 39, Senior Vice President of Old Line Bank, has been in charge of branch
operations of Old Line Bank since March 2002. Prior to joining Old Line Bank, he was a Vice
President at The Columbia Bank where he was responsible for various aspects of branch operations
for six years. Prior to his tenure at The Columbia Bank, he held various positions at First
Virginia Bank. Mr. Franklin has over 14 years of banking experience. He
57
resides in Crofton, Maryland.
Erin G. Lyddane, 31, Treasurer and Vice President of Old Line Bank, has been responsible for
the daily operations of the bank and financial reporting since February 2000. She has worked in
various positions at the bank, including Assistant Vice President, Branch Manager, Assistant
Treasurer and Cashier. She joined Old Line Bank in 1992. She resides in LaPlata, Maryland.
Sandi F. Burnett, 47, Senior Vice President of Old Line Bank, is the team leader for the
College Park loan production office since August 2005. Prior to joining Old Line Bank, she was
employed by BB&T, a major south-eastern regional bank, most recently as a City Executive, Senior
Vice President. In this capacity, she was responsible for supervising the overall team management,
portfolio quality and growth within suburban Maryland, principally Prince Georges County. Prior
to this position, she was employed by Commerce Bank, a local bank that merged into BB&T in 1999.
She started with Commerce Bank in 1994. Ms. Burnett is a career banker with over 26 years of
commercial banking experience. She resides in Lothian, Maryland. Ms.
Burnett is the sister-in-law of Joseph W. Burnett.
The officers of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and Old Line Bank are elected annually by the
respective Boards of Directors following the annual meeting of stockholders and serve for terms of
one year or until their successors are duly elected and qualified except where a longer term is
expressly provided in an employment contract duly authorized and approved by the Board of
Directors. See -Employment Agreements.
Board Meetings and Committees
General
The Board of Directors of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. has standing audit, nominating and
compensation committees. Old Line Bank also has a number of standing committees, including the
asset & liability committee, audit committee, compensation committee, loan/loan review committee,
nominating committee and real estate committee. The members of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s and Old
Line Banks audit, compensation and nominating committees are the same, and these committees
typically hold joint meetings.
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s policy requires that, in the absence of an unavoidable conflict,
all directors are expected to attend the annual meeting of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s
stockholders. All members of the Board of Directors attended the 2005 annual meeting.
Audit Committee
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s audit committee currently has three members: Craig E. Clark, James
F. Dent and John D. Mitchell, Jr. The Board of Directors has determined that each of these
individuals is independent, as defined under the applicable rules and listing standards of the
Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that each committee member is able to read and
understand fundamental financial statements, including Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s consolidated
balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. The audit committee has adopted a written
charter, a copy of which is available in the stockholder relations section of Old Line Banks
website.
The audit committees primary responsibilities are to assist the Board of Directors by
monitoring (i) the integrity of the financial statements of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.; (ii) the
independent auditors qualifications and independence; (iii) the performance of Old Line
Bancshares, Inc.s and its subsidiaries internal audit function and independent auditors;(iv) Old
Line Bancshares Inc.s system of internal controls; (v) Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s financial
reporting and system of disclosure controls; and (vi) Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s compliance with
legal and regulatory requirements.
The audit committee also has oversight responsibility over the treatment of, and any necessary
investigation concerning, any employee complaints or other concerns regarding Old Line Bancshares,
Inc.s accounting and auditing matters. Pursuant to procedures adopted by Old Line Bancshares,
Inc., any employee with such complaints or concerns is encouraged to report them, anonymously if
they desire, to the Chair of the audit committee for
58
investigation, and if appropriate, corrective action, by the audit committee and Old Line
Bancshares, Inc.
Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, we are required to disclose in our
annual report whether one or more members of our audit committee is an audit committee financial
expert, as that term is defined by the SEC, and the name of that member. If, however, the Board
of Directors of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. determines that none of the audit committee members
possess the requisite expertise, an explanation is required as to why this is the case.
The SEC defines the term audit committee financial expert to mean a person who has the
following qualifications:
|
|
|
An understanding of generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements; |
|
|
|
|
The ability to assess the general application of such principles in connection with the
accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves; |
|
|
|
|
Experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that
present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally
comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be
raised by the financial statements, or experience actively supervising one or more persons
engaged in such activities; |
|
|
|
|
An understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting; and |
|
|
|
|
An understanding of audit committee functions. |
In our 2004 annual report, we reported that the Board of Directors had determined that Randy
A. Lakes, a former member of our Board of Directors and the former chairman of our audit committee,
was the audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC. Mr. Lakes resigned from the
Board of Directors of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and Old Line Bank effective on June 13, 2005 due to
professional obligations.
In light of Mr. Lakes resignation, our Board of Directors has determined that, as of the date
of this prospectus, none of the members of our audit committee meet the definition of audit
committee financial expert.
Unlike the SEC rule which would require us to explain why we do not have an audit committee
financial expert in our annual report, the rules governing the listing of our common stock on the
NASDAQ SmallCap Market require that we have an audit committee financial expert at all times,
unless an exception applies. Mr. Lakes resignation satisfies an exception to the general rule
provided that we again have an audit committee financial expert by the earlier of our 2006
stockholders meeting or June 13, 2006 (one year from the date of Mr. Lakes resignation). As
required by the applicable NASDAQ rules, we have informed NASDAQ SmallCap Market of our current
lack of an audit committee financial expert.
In its proposing release regarding financial experts on audit committees, the SEC indicated
that a primary benefit of having a financial expert serving on a companys audit committee is that
the person, with his or her enhanced level of financial sophistication or expertise, can serve as a
resource for the audit committee as a whole in carrying out its functions. While our Board of
Directors recognizes the importance of having such a person serve on the audit committee, it
believes that our audit committee, as it is presently constituted, is able to carry out its
functions fully and in the best interests of our stockholders, notwithstanding the lack of an
audit committee financial expert.
Our Board of Directors expects that it will add a director to the audit committee who would
qualify as an audit committee financial expert by the date required to comply with the NASDAQ
rules.
Nominating Committee
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. nominating committee currently has three members: Nancy L.
Gasparovic, Craig E. Clark and Gregory S. Proctor, Jr. The Board of Directors has determined that
each of these individuals is
59
independent, as defined under the applicable rules and listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock
Market, Inc. The nominating committee has adopted a written charter, a copy of which is available
in the stockholder relations section of Old Line Banks website.
The nominating committee determines whether the incumbent directors should stand for
reelection to the Board of Directors and identifies and evaluates candidates for membership on the
Board of Directors. In the case of a director nominated to fill a vacancy on the Board of
Directors due to an increase in the size of the Board of Directors, the nominating committee
recommends to the Board of Directors the class of directors in which the director-nominee should
serve. The nominating committee also conducts appropriate inquiries into the backgrounds and
qualifications of possible director candidates and reviews and makes recommendations regarding the
composition and size of the Board of Directors. The nominating committee will also evaluate
candidates for nomination to the Board of Directors who are recommended by a stockholder.
Compensation Committee
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s compensation committee currently has three members: Charles A.
Bongar, Craig E. Clark, and Gail D. Manuel. The Board of Directors has determined that each of
these individuals is independent, as defined under the applicable rules and listing standards of
the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
The compensation committee evaluates the performance of the president and chief executive
officer and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the president and chief
executive officers compensation. The compensation committee also reviews the current industry
practices regarding compensation packages provided to executive management and the Board of
Directors, including salary, bonus, stock options and other perquisites. Based on recommendations
from the president and chief executive officer, the compensation committee approves compensation
provided to members of executive management, excluding the president and chief executive officer.
The compensation committee also evaluates and recommends to the Board of Directors fees for
non-employee board members.
Director Compensation
For 2005, each non-employee Director of Old Line Bank, other than the Chairman of the Board
and the Vice Chairman of the Board, receives $400 for each attended meeting of the Board of
Directors, and $200 for each attended meeting of the asset & liability committee, the loan/loan
review committee, the real estate committee and the nominating committee. Each non-employee
Director of Old Line Bank, other than the Chairman of the Board and the Vice Chairman of the Board,
also receives $300 for each attended meeting of the compensation committee and the audit committee.
Each non-employee Director of Old Line Bank, other than the Chairman of the Board and the Vice
Chairman of the Board, also receives a $250 quarterly retainer. During 2005, the Chairman of the
Board will receive an annual compensation of $30,000 and the Vice Chairman will receive an annual
compensation of $15,000. We reserve the right to change these amounts during 2005.
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. has paid no cash remuneration, direct or otherwise, to its directors
since its incorporation. It is expected that unless and until Old Line Bancshares, Inc. becomes
actively involved in additional businesses other than owning all the capital stock of Old Line
Bank, no separate cash compensation will be paid to the directors of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. in
addition to that paid to them by Old Line Bank in their capacities as directors of Old Line Bank.
However, Old Line Bancshares, Inc. may determine in the future that such separate cash compensation
is appropriate.
In addition to cash compensation, since 1997, Old Line Bancshares, Inc. or Old Line Bank
(prior to Old Line Banks reorganization into the holding company structure) has granted options in
December of each year to its non-employee directors. Historically, each non-employee director was
granted an option to purchase 750 shares. For 2004, Old Line Bancshares, Inc. increased the 750
amount to 1,000 (1,200 shares if adjusted for the stock dividend). All options were granted at
fair market value, are exercisable immediately, and expire on the tenth anniversary of
the grant date. Also, the options terminate (if not exercised) on the first anniversary of the
termination of the directors service on the Board of Directors.
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. intends to grant options to purchase 1,200 shares of its common
stock to its non-
60
employee directors in December 2005. It is anticipated that the options will be granted at
fair market value, will be exercisable immediately, and will expire on the tenth
anniversary of the grant date. It is also anticipated that the options will terminate (if
not exercised) on the first anniversary of the termination of the directors service on the Board
of Directors. Old Line Bancshares, Inc. reserves the right to change this policy.
Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth the compensation paid by Old Line Bank to its Chief Executive
Officer and to any other executive officer who received compensation in excess of $100,000 during
2004.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation |
|
Long-term Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
All Other |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary ($) |
|
Bonus ($) |
|
Options (#) |
|
Compensation |
James W. Cornelsen, President &
Chief Executive Officer (1) |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
$ |
127,609 |
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
135,000 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
|
3,960 |
|
|
$ |
11,069 |
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
$ |
120,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
3,960 |
|
|
$ |
4,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph E. Burnett
Senior Vice President &
Chief Lending Officer (2) |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
114,000 |
|
|
$ |
17,000 |
|
|
|
3,960 |
|
|
$ |
6,105 |
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
107,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
$ |
6,126 |
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christine M. Rush
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
Corporate Secretary &
Chief Credit Officer (3) |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
17,000 |
|
|
|
3,960 |
|
|
$ |
5,609 |
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,000 |
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
$ |
4,794 |
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
$ |
84,000 |
|
|
$ |
13,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,468 |
|
(1) |
|
Other compensation includes $6,783, $6,633, and $2,400 of contributions to Old Line
Banks 401(k) retirement plan for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively; $2,480, $3,160, and
$990 of term life insurance payments paid by Old Line Bank on Mr. Cornelsens behalf for
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively; auto reimbursement of $176, $1,276, and $805 in 2004,
2003 and 2002, respectively. In 2004, Mr. Cornelsen exercised his option to purchase
18,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.81. The market price of the
common stock on the date of exercise was $9.31. The exercise price, the market price and
the number of shares of common stock are adjusted for the 20% stock dividend paid on March
24, 2005. All other compensation in 2004 includes the $118,170 that represents the dollar
difference between the price paid of the common stock and the fair market value of the
common stock at exercise of the options. |
(2) |
|
Other compensation includes $4,890, $4,910, and $2,000 of contributions to Old Line
Banks 401(k) retirement plan for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively; and $1,215, $1,216,
and $722 of term life insurance payments paid by Old Line Bank on Mr. Burnetts behalf for
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. |
(3) |
|
Other compensation includes $4,279, $4,190, and $1,935 of contributions to Old Line
Banks 401(k) retirement plan for 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively; and $1,330, $604, and
$533 of term life insurance payments paid by Old Line Bank on Ms. Rushs behalf for 2004,
2003 and 2002. |
61
The following table contains information concerning the grant of stock options made during the
last completed fiscal year to Messrs. Cornelsen and Burnett and Ms. Rush.
Individual Grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
Granted to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Employees in |
|
Exercise or Base |
|
Expiration |
Name |
|
Granted |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Price ($/Share)(1) |
|
Date |
James W. Cornelsen (2) |
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
|
57.69 |
% |
|
$ |
9.83 |
|
|
|
12/31/2014 |
|
Joseph E. Burnett (3) |
|
|
3,960 |
|
|
|
21.15 |
% |
|
$ |
9.83 |
|
|
|
12/31/2014 |
|
Christine M. Rush (4) |
|
|
3,960 |
|
|
|
21.15 |
% |
|
$ |
9.83 |
|
|
|
12/31/2014 |
|
(1) |
|
The exercise price is equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. |
(2) |
|
Mr. Cornelsen received options to purchase 10,800 shares of common stock in December
2004 pursuant to his employment agreement. One-third of the grant vested as of December
31, 2004, one-third of the grant will vest on December 31, 2005 and one-third of the grant
will vest on December 31, 2006. |
(3) |
|
Mr. Burnett received options to purchase 3,960 shares of common stock in December 2004
pursuant to his employment agreement. One-third of the grant vested as of December 31,
2004, one-third of the grant will vest on December 31, 2005 and one-third of the grant will
vest on December 31, 2006. |
(4) |
|
Ms. Rush received options to purchase 3,960 shares of common stock in December 2004
pursuant to her employment agreement. One-third of the grant vested as of December 31,
2004, one-third of the grant will vest on December 31, 2005 and one-third of the grant will
vest on December 31, 2006. |
The following table sets forth information on the aggregate number of shares of common stock
exercised during 2004 by Mr. Cornelsen and the value realized by him as a result of such exercise,
the underlying unexercised options held as of December 31, 2004 by Mr. Cornelsen, Mr. Burnett and
Ms. Rush and the aggregate dollar value of in-the-money unexercised options held as of December 31,
2004 by Mr. Cornelsen, Mr. Burnett and Ms. Rush.
Aggregate Options Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities |
|
Value of Unexercised in-the- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
Money |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised Options at |
|
Options at |
|
|
Acquired |
|
Value |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
December 31, 2004(1) |
Name |
|
On Exercise (#) |
|
Realized ($) |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
James W. Cornelsen |
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
$ |
118,170 |
(2) |
|
|
28,800 |
(3) |
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
$ |
114,975 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Joseph E. Burnett |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
4,020 |
(4) |
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
$ |
653 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Christine M . Rush |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
4,020 |
(4) |
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
$ |
653 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the total gain which would be realized if all in-the-money options held at
December 31, 2004 were exercised, determined by multiplying the number of shares underlying
the options by the difference between the per share option exercise price and the fair
market value of the shares at December 31, 2004 of $9.83. |
(2) |
|
On February 26, 2004, Mr. Cornelsen exercised his option to purchase 18,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $2.81. The
market price of the common stock on the
date of exercise was $9.31. The |
62
|
|
value realized represents the dollar difference between
the price paid of the common stock and the fair market value of the common stock at
exercise of the options. |
(3) |
|
The exercise price of these options is $3.97 per share with respect to 3,600 of these
options, $4.725 per share with respect to 3,600 of these options, $3.60 per share with
respect to 4,500 of these options, $4.39
with respect to 4,500 of these options, $4.94 with respect to 4,500 of these options, $9.58
with respect to 4,500 of these options and $9.825 with respect to 3,600 of these options. |
(4) |
|
The exercise price of these options is $9.58 per share with respect to 2,700 of these
options and 9.83 per share with respect to 1,320 of these options. |
The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2004, with respect to
compensation plans under which equity securities of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. are authorized for
issuance.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities to be issued |
|
Weighted average exercise |
|
Number of securities |
|
|
upon exercise of outstanding |
|
price of outstanding options, |
|
remaining available for |
Plan Category |
|
options, warrants and rights |
|
warrants and rights |
|
future issuance |
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security
holders(1)
|
|
|
114,420 |
|
|
$ |
6.62 |
|
|
|
293,580 |
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the 1990 Stock Option Plan, as amended, the 2001 Incentive Stock Option Plan,
as amended and the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. The 1990 Stock Option Plan, as amended and
the 2001 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended, were approved by security holders of Old
Line Bank and its predecessor, Old Line National Bank. Effective September 15, 2003, all
of the then stockholders of Old Line Bank became stockholders of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
The 2004 Equity Incentive Plan was approved by security holders of Old Line Bancshares,
Inc. |
|
Employment Agreements
Old Line Bank has entered into employment agreements with each of James W. Cornelsen, Joseph
W. Burnett and Christine M. Rush.
On March 31, 2003, Old Line Bank entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Cornelsen
(replacing a 1999 agreement) to serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Old Line
Bank. This agreement provides for an initial term of five years and may be extended by the Board
of Directors, in their sole discretion, for one additional year or such greater term as the Board
of Directors deems appropriate. In December 2003, the Board of Directors extended the term by one
additional year and did the same in December 2004. Mr. Cornelsens employment agreement is
currently set to expire in March 2010.
Mr. Cornelsens agreement currently provides for a salary of $190,000 and Mr. Cornelsen may
receive an annual bonus to be determined by the Board of Directors. In addition, Mr. Cornelsen is
entitled to receive an annual grant of options to purchase at least 4,500 shares of common stock of
Old Line Bancshares, Inc., assuming such options are available to
grant under a stockholder
approved stock option plan.
The agreement terminates upon Mr. Cornelsens death, permanent disability or by mutual written
agreement. In addition, Mr. Cornelsen may terminate the agreement within six months following a
change in control, as described below, or for good reason as described in the agreement. Old
Line Bank may terminate the agreement for certain events constituting cause as described in the
agreement. Old Line Bank may also terminate the agreement without cause provided that it provides
sixty days prior written notice to Mr. Cornelsen.
If Mr. Cornelsen terminates the agreement for good reason, or if Old Line Bank terminates Mr.
Cornelsens employment without cause or because of permanent disability, Mr. Cornelsen will receive
severance pay for the remaining term of the agreement in an amount equal to his average annual
compensation over the prior five years.
63
If Mr. Cornelsen is terminated or terminates his employment in anticipation of or within six
months following a change in control, he is entitled to a single payment equal to 2.99 times his
average annual compensation over the prior five years. If the change of control payments were
required to be paid in 2005, Mr. Cornelsen would receive approximately $421,369.
Pursuant to the employment agreement, a change in control will occur if:
|
|
|
any person or persons acting in concert acquires, whether by purchase, assignment,
transfer, pledge or otherwise (including as a result of a redemption of securities),
then outstanding voting securities of Old Line Bancshares, Inc, if, after the
transaction, the acquiring person (or persons) owns, controls or holds with power to
vote twenty-five percent (25%) or more of any class of voting securities of Old Line
Bancshares, Inc., as the case may be; |
|
|
|
|
within any twelve-month period (beginning on or after the effective date of the
employment agreement) the persons who were directors of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
immediately before the beginning of such twelve-month period (the Incumbent
Directors) cease to constitute at least a majority of such Board of Directors;
provided that any director who was not a director as of the effective date of the
employment agreement will be deemed to be an Incumbent Director if that director was
elected to such Board of Directors by, or on the recommendation of or with the approval
of, at least two-thirds of the directors who then qualified as Incumbent Directors; |
|
|
|
|
the stockholders of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. approve a reorganization, merger or
consolidation with respect to which persons who were the stockholders of Old Line
Bancshares, Inc. immediately prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation do
not, immediately thereafter, own more than fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting
power entitled to vote in the election of directors of the reorganized, merged or
consolidated companys then outstanding voting securities (other than in connection
with the formation of the holding company); or |
|
|
|
|
all or substantially all of the assets of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. are sold,
transferred or assigned to any third party. |
On March 31, 2003, Old Line Bank entered into employment agreements with Mr. Burnett and Ms.
Rush to serve as Senior Vice Presidents of Old Line Bank. Each agreement has an initial term of
two years and thereafter automatically extend for periods of one year unless either party
terminates the automatic renewal by giving written notice ninety days prior to the renewal date.
No party provided such a notice within 90 days of March 31, 2005.
Mr. Burnetts agreement currently provides for a salary of $127,000 and Ms. Rushs agreement
currently provides for a salary of $120,000. Each of these two officers may receive an annual
discretionary bonus. In addition, these officers are each entitled to receive an annual grant of
options to purchase at least 2,700 shares of common stock of Old Line Bancshares, Inc., assuming
such options are available to grant under a stockholder approved stock option plan.
Each agreement terminates upon the employees death or physical or mental incapacitation that
has left the employee unable to perform his or her duties for a period of sixty consecutive days.
In addition, the employee may terminate his or her agreement by giving Old Line Bank sixty days
written notice. Old Line Bank may terminate each agreement for certain events constituting cause
as described in the agreements. Each employee is entitled to receive the remaining balance of his
or her unused vacation and personal leave at the termination of employment unless the employee is
terminated for cause.
64
Bank Owned Life Insurance Policy and SERP Agreements
During June 2005, we remitted a one time premium payment of $3.3 million to a broker for an
insurance company for the purchase of Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) on the lives of our
executive officers Messrs. Cornelsen and Burnett and Ms. Rush. We have submitted applications for
the BOLI and the officers have completed their physicals required for
the insurance. By November 1,
2005, we will enter into supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) agreements with the
executives. The SERP agreements will provide for future benefits to the executives. We will also
enter into separate agreements that will provide that upon the death of the executive, Old Line
Bank will split the insurance proceeds in excess of cash surrender value evenly between Old Line
Bank and the executive officers designated beneficiary.
Incentive Compensation
2004 Equity Incentive Plan
General. On May 27, 2004, Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s stockholders, upon the recommendation
of its Board of Directors, approved the Old Line Bancshares, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the
2004 Plan). The 2004 Plan is intended to encourage stock ownership by employees of Old Line
Bancshares, Inc. and any current or future subsidiaries, including Old Line Bank, so that they may
acquire or increase their proprietary interest in Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and align their
interests with the interests of the stockholders, and to provide an incentive to such employees to
remain in our employ. The 2004 Plan is also intended to encourage our directors who are not either
our employees or employees of our subsidiary (Eligible Directors) to acquire or increase their
proprietary interest in us, to further promote and strengthen the interest of such Eligible
Directors in our development and financial success, and to assist us in attracting and retaining
highly qualified directors.
Administration of the Stock Option Plan; Eligibility of Participants. The 2004 Plan is
administered by the compensation committee of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Board of Directors. The
compensation committee has the authority, subject to and not inconsistent with the express
provisions of the 2004 Plan, to administer the 2004 Plan and to exercise all the powers and
authorities either specifically granted to it under the 2004 Plan or necessary or advisable in the
administration of the 2004 Plan, including, without limitation, the authority to grant options
(Options) and make awards of restricted shares and restricted units (Restricted Stock Awards
and Restricted Unit Awards, respectively, and sometimes collectively with the grant of Options,
Grants); to determine the purchase price of the shares of our common stock covered by each
Option, which shall be not less than the fair market value (as defined in the 2004 Plan) thereof
(the Option Price); to determine the persons to whom, and the time or times at which, Options,
Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Unit Awards are to be granted; to determine the number of
shares to be covered by each Option, and to determine the number of restricted shares and
restricted units to be covered by each Restricted Stock Award and Restricted Unit Award; to
interpret the 2004 Plan; to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the 2004
Plan; to determine the terms and provisions of the agreements (which need not be identical) entered
into in connection with grants of Options and Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Unit Awards;
and to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the
2004 Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the full Board of Directors may exercise some or all of
the powers of the compensation committee with respect to Grants to Eligible Directors.
Eligibility. Options, Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Unit Awards may be granted to
employees (including, without limitation, officers who are employees) of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
or its present or future and subsidiaries, and to Eligible Directors of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
or its present or future subsidiaries. A person to whom an Option has been granted hereunder is
sometimes referred to as an Optionee.
Share of Common Stock Subject to the 2004 Plan. Subject to the next sentence, the aggregate
number of shares of our common stock as to which Options and Restricted Stock may be granted from
time to time under the 2004 Plan may not exceed 300,000 shares. The share amount in the preceding
sentence shall be subject to adjustment in the event of certain changes in the capital structure of
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. Such was the case in connection with the 20% stock dividend, when the
shares subject to the 2004 Plan increased from 250,000 to 300,000. The shares to be made subject
to Grants under the 2004 Plan may, in whole or in part, be authorized but unissued shares or shares
that shall have been or may be reacquired by Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
65
Except with respect to Incentive Stock Options, if any shares subject to an Option grant or
Restricted Stock Award are forfeited, canceled, exchanged or surrendered (Forfeited) or if a
Grant otherwise terminates or expires without a distribution of shares to the Grantee, the shares
of our common stock with respect to such Grant would be, to the extent Forfeited or otherwise
terminated or expired, again available for Grants under the 2004 Plan. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, in no event shall any such shares be again available for Grants under the 2004 Plan if
such action would cause the 2004 Plan to be a formula plan under applicable interpretations of
The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
Terms of Options. Each Option granted pursuant to the 2004 Plan must be evidenced by a
written Option Agreement between Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and the Optionee, which provides, among
other things, the number of shares subject to such Option, the Option Price, the form and time of
payment for shares to be received upon exercise of the Option, the term of the Option (which may
not exceed 10 years), and other terms and conditions. Options may be either Incentive Stock
Options, within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, or Nonstatutory Stock
Options, which are not intended to be Incentive Stock Options.
In general, Options may be exercised over such period, in cumulative installments or
otherwise, or upon such terms and conditions, as the compensation committee may determine;
provided, however, that the compensation committee has the authority to accelerate the
exercisability of all or any portion of any outstanding Option at such time and under such
circumstances as it, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate, as long as such exercise period is
not earlier than six months from the date of grant of such Option and does not exceed 10 years from
the date of grant of such Option.
The exercise price of any Option granted must be at least 100 percent of the fair market value
of the common stock on the date of grant. The exercise price must be paid at the time of exercise
in cash or, if permitted by the compensation committee, (i) in shares of common stock, (ii) in a
combination of cash and shares of common stock, or (iii) in a cashless exercise procedure through a
broker; provided, however, that such method and time for payment shall be permitted by and be in
compliance with applicable law.
If an Optionees employment or service terminates for cause, all options, whether or not then
exercisable, will terminate immediately upon such termination. If an Optionees employment or
service terminates other than for cause and other than by death, disability or retirement (in the
case of Eligible Directors only), all Options then exercisable shall terminate three months after
the date of such termination with respect to Options to employees and one year after the date of
such termination with respect to Options to Eligible Directors; provided, however, that the
compensation committee may in its discretion extend the period for exercise of Options that were
exercisable at the time of separation of employment or cessation of service to a later date, but in
any event not beyond the date on which the Option would otherwise expire.
If an Optionees employment or service terminates by reason of death, disability or retirement
(in the case of Eligible Directors only), all Options then exercisable may be exercised by the
Optionee or by the Optionees estate or by a person who acquired the right to exercise such Option
by bequest or inheritance or otherwise by reason of the death or disability of the Optionee, at any
time within one (1) year after the date of death or termination by reason of disability or
retirement, or at such later time as the compensation committee may in its discretion determine,
but in any event not beyond the date on which the Option would otherwise expire.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, all Incentive Stock Options will lapse and cease to be
exercisable no later than three months following the termination of Grantees employment unless (i)
the Grantees termination of employment is a result of death or disability, in which event the
Incentive Stock Option will lapse and cease to be exercisable no later than one year after the date
of death or disability; or (ii) the Grantee dies following the termination of employment and while
the Incentive Stock Option is still exercisable, in which event the Incentive Stock Option will
lapse and cease to be exercisable no later than one (1) year after the date of death.
If a change of control (as defined in the 2004 Plan) occurs while unexercisable Options remain
outstanding under the 2004 Plan, Options not previously exercisable by their terms will become
fully exercisable. Following the change of control, the compensation committee may cause any
Option to be canceled in consideration of a cash payment or alternative award made to the holder of
such Option equal in value to the fair market value of the canceled Option (which shall equal the
fair market value of the shares of common stock underlying the Option, less
66
any exercise price therefor).
Terms and Conditions of Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Unit Awards. The 2004 Plan
provides for the grant of restricted shares and restricted units. In general, a Grantee may not
sell, assign, transfer, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of any restricted shares or
restricted units, except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, until the restricted
period elapses. In determining the restricted period of an award, the compensation committee may
provide that the restrictions lapse with respect to specified percentages of the awarded shares or
units upon the satisfaction of such conditions as the compensation committee may impose.
Participants may be granted awards of restricted units under the 2004 Plan, which entitle such
participant to receive on the date on which the restricted period lapses, an amount in cash equal
to, with respect to each such unit, the fair market value of one share of common stock on such
date.
If during the restricted period, the Grantees continuous employment terminates for any
reason, any restricted shares and any restricted units remaining subject to restrictions will be
forfeited by the employee and transferred, at no cost, to Old Line Bancshares, Inc. Upon the
occurrence of a change of control, all restrictions outstanding with respect to Restricted Stock
Awards and Restricted Unit Awards will automatically expire. The compensation committee has the
authority to cancel any or all outstanding restrictions prior to the end of the restricted period.
Amendment and Termination. Our Board of Directors may suspend, terminate, modify or amend the
2004 Plan at any time. Unless earlier terminated by the Board of Directors, the 2004 Plan will
continue in effect until March 25, 2014.
While the Board of Directors may amend or terminate the 2004 Plan, in general, stockholder
approval is required for any amendment that would increase the aggregate number of shares of common
stock that may be available for Grants under the 2004 Plan or that would reduce the exercise price
for Options by repricing or replacing such Options. The compensation committee does not have the
authority to cancel any outstanding Option and issue a new Option in its place with a lower
exercise price; provided, however, that this does not prohibit an exchange offer whereby Old Line
Bancshares, Inc. provides certain participants with an election to cancel an outstanding Option and
receive a grant of a new Option at a future date if such exchange offer only occurs with
stockholder approval.
Grants Outstanding under the 2004 Plan
As of the date of this prospectus, there were options to purchase 52,720 shares of our common
stock outstanding pursuant to the 2004 Plan. These options are exercisable at exercise prices
ranging from $9.83 to $10.23 per share. We have not issued any restricted shares or restricted
units under the 2004 Plan.
Other Stock Option Plans
Prior to the 2004 Plan, we issued options pursuant to our 1990 Stock Option Plan and our 2001
Stock Option Plan. Pursuant to these plans, we granted options to our executive officers and to
our directors.
The 1990 Stock Option Plan had a 10-year term, which terminated in 2000. In general, options
granted pursuant to this plan expire on the 10th anniversary of the date of grant. As of the date
of this prospectus, there were options to purchase 15,300 shares of our common stock outstanding
pursuant to the 1990 Stock Option Plan. These options are exercisable at exercise prices ranging
from $3.97 to $4.72.
The 2001 Stock Option Plan has a 10-year term. In general, options granted pursuant to this
plan expire on the 10th anniversary of the date of grant. As of the date of this prospectus, there
were options to purchase 58,800 shares of our common stock outstanding pursuant to the 2001 Stock
Option Plan. These options are exercisable at exercise prices ranging from $3.33 to $9.83. We do
not anticipate granting any additional options pursuant to the 2001 Plan.
67
Incentive Plan Model and Stock Option Model
On June 24, 2005, our Board of Directors approved an Incentive Plan Model and a Stock Option
Model for calendar year 2005 for Messrs Cornelsen and Burnett and Ms. Rush. The Incentive Plan
Model and the Stock Option Model provide mechanisms under which the compensation committee may in
its discretion authorize cash and equity compensation bonuses to the executive officers.
The models provide the compensation committee with guidelines for determining discretionary
bonuses. The cash bonus under the Incentive Plan Model is determined by multiplying the named
executives base salary by a percentage factor calculated based on our return on assets, return on
equity and earnings per share at a threshold, target and stretch level. The options to be granted
under the Stock Option Model depend on whether we meet the cumulative threshold, target and stretch
levels for our return on assets, return on equity and earnings per share. If we do, options with a
value equal on the date of grant to a percentage of the executives base salary based on the
Black-Scholes pricing model would be issued to the executives.
Under the Incentive Plan Model, at the target levels, Mr. Cornelsen would be eligible to
receive a bonus equal to 25% of his base salary and Mr. Burnett and Ms. Rush would be eligible to
receive a bonus equal to 15% of their base salaries. Under the Stock Option Model, at the target
levels, the officers would be eligible to receive options with a value equal on the date of grant
to 20% (for Mr. Cornelsen) or 10% (for Mr. Burnett and Ms. Rush) of base salary based on
Black-Scholes pricing model.
The compensation committee designed the incentive structure to reward achievement based on our
return on assets, return on equity and earnings per share, and to discourage the achievement of one
metric at the expense of the others. The Board of Directors and the compensation committee of the
Board of Directors may adjust, modify or terminate the models, in full or in part, at any time in
their sole discretion. Notwithstanding the Stock Option Model, the executive officers will
continue to receive a number of options at least equal to the number provided for in their
employment agreements, subject to the terms of those agreements.
Employer Benefit Plans
Discounted Loan Rate and Free Checking
Old Line Bank currently provides employees a 1% discount on the then prevailing market
interest rate on loans made by Old Line Bank to the employee, subject to satisfaction with Old Line
Banks underwriting standards for such loans. Additionally, all employees receive free checking.
Health and Retirement
Old Line Bank currently provides health care benefits, including medical, disability and group
life insurance, subject to certain deductibles and copayments, for its full time employees.
Old Line Bank maintains a 401(k) profit sharing plan for employees who meet the eligibility
requirements set forth in the plan. Pursuant to the plan, Old Line Bank matches the first 3% of
employee contributions to the plan and 50% of the next 2% of employee contributions, for a maximum
required contribution of 4% of employee eligible compensation. This plan, which covers
substantially all employees, allows for elective employee deferrals. Old Line Banks contributions
to the plan for 2004, 2003 and 2002, were $42,673, $37,716 and $14,255, respectively.
68
STOCK OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS
The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of Old
Line Bancshares, Inc.s common stock by each director, by its executive officers and by all of its
directors and executive officers as a group, as well as information regarding each other person
that we believe own in excess of 5% of the outstanding common stock. Unless otherwise noted below,
we believe that each person named in the table has or will have the sole voting and sole investment
power with respect to each of the securities reported as owned by such person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to |
|
of Shares |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Purchase |
|
Beneficially |
|
Percentage of |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1) |
|
Stock |
|
Common Stock |
|
Owned(2) |
|
Ownership (3) |
Charles A . Bongar, Jr.(4) |
|
|
19,890 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
21,990 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
% |
Joseph E. Burnett |
|
|
18,900 |
|
|
|
4,020 |
|
|
|
22,920 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
Craig E. Clark(5) |
|
|
82,199 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
84,299 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
|
James W . Cornelsen |
|
|
49,394 |
|
|
|
28,800 |
|
|
|
78,194 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
|
Daniel W . Deming(6) |
|
|
16,200 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
23,700 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
James F. Dent |
|
|
43,290 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
50,790 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
Nancy L. Gasparovic |
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
13,800 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
Frank Lucente(7) |
|
|
122,520 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
125,520 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
|
Gail D. Manuel(8) |
|
|
9,900 |
|
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
13,800 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
John D. Mitchell(9) |
|
|
10,828 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
18,328 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
Gregory S. Proctor, Jr. |
|
|
4,302 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
5,502 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
Christine M . Rush(10) |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
4,020 |
|
|
|
5,820 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors & executive officers
as a group (12 people) |
|
|
385,523 |
|
|
|
79,140 |
|
|
|
464,663 |
|
|
|
20.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John S. Clark
305 Lake Shore Drive
Shady Shores , Texas 76208 |
|
|
122,400 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
122,400 |
|
|
|
5.69 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey A . Miller and Eric D.
Jacobs (11)
c/o Miller & Jacobs Capital, L.L.C.
P.O. Box 26039, Gallows Bay Station
Christiansted, Virgin Islands
00824 |
|
|
118,680 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
118,680 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person listed in the foregoing table is
the address of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. |
|
(2) |
|
The total number of shares beneficially owned includes shares of common stock owned by the
named persons as of the date of this prospectus and shares of common stock subject to options held
by the named persons that are exercisable as of, or within 60 days of, the date of this prospectus. |
69
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The shares of common stock subject to options are deemed outstanding for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of the person holding the options, but are not deemed
outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 480 shares of common stock held for the benefit of his grandson. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 62,736 shares of common stock held jointly with his spouse. Does not include 11,329
shares owned by
an individual retirement account for the benefit of his spouse. Mr. Clark disclaims beneficial
ownership in such shares. Does not include 4,800 shares of common stock held in trust for the
benefit of his mother-in-law. His spouse is trustee of the trust. Mr. Clark disclaims beneficial
ownership in such shares. |
|
(6) |
|
Holds 6,840 shares of common stock jointly with his spouse, and 9,000 shares of common stock in
Deming Associates, Inc. of which Mr. Deming is President and sole owner. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes 63,100 shares of common stock held by Lucente Enterprises, Inc., of which Mr. Lucente
is the President, and 3,110 shares of common stock held by Chesapeake Custom Homes, LLC, of which
Lucente Enterprises, Inc. is a manager and the majority member. Does not include 5,760 share owned
by an individual retirement account for the benefit of his spouse. Mr. Lucente disclaims
beneficial ownership in such shares. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 1,008 shares of common stock held jointly with her spouse. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes 60 shares of common stock held for the benefit of his granddaughter. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes 360 shares of common stock held jointly with Mark O. Posten. |
|
(11) |
|
Mr. Jacobs and Mr. Miller have indicated that they indirectly own 118,680 shares of common
stock as the sole managers and members of Miller & Jacobs Capital, L.L.C., which is affiliated
with several investment entities, including the Acadia Fund I, L.P. |
70
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
General
Old Line Bank has had in the past, and expects to have in the future, banking transactions
with directors and executive officers and the business and professional organizations in which they
are associated in the ordinary course of business. Any loans and loan commitments are made in
accordance with all applicable laws. In the opinion of management, these transactions do not and
will not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features.
Directors or officers with any personal interest in any loan application are excluded from
considering any such loan application. The aggregate amount of loans outstanding at December 31,
2004 and 2003 to Old Line Banks directors, officers and their affiliates was approximately $2.9
million and $2.0 million, respectively. In addition, any future
transactions with officers, directors and five percent stockholders
will be undertaken on terms no less favorable to Old Line Bancshares
than could be obtained from independent third parties.
Old Line Bank has entered into various transactions with firms in which owners are also
members of the Board of Directors. Fees charged for these services are at similar rates charged by
unrelated parties for similar work. We paid to these parties a total of $6,886, $10,159, and
$18,175 during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
One of our new commercial lenders, Sandi Burnett, is the sister in law of Joseph W. Burnett,
the Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of Old Line Bank.
Ms. Burnett's current salary is $130,000 per year, in addition to any
discretionary bonus she may receive. She does not have an employment
agreement and is an at-will employee. Upon commencement of her
employment in August, 2005, Ms. Burnett was granted options to
purchase 12,000 shares of our common stock at the fair market
value on the date of grant. The options vest equally over a period of
five years, beginning with the date of the option grant and expire in
10 years. Although it is not
anticipated that Ms. Burnett will be paid more than $60,000 in compensation during 2005 (due to her
start in August 2005), it is anticipated that she will be paid in excess of $60,000 in 2006 and
thereafter.
Pointer Ridge
On July 22, 2004, Old Line Bancshares, Inc. executed an Operating Agreement as a member with
unaffiliated parties, Lucente Enterprises, Inc., and Chesapeake Custom Homes, LLC, as members, and
Chesapeake Pointer Ridge Manager, LLC, as manager, to establish Pointer Ridge Office Investment,
LLC (Pointer Ridge). The members ownership of Pointer Ridge is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Unaffiliated parties |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
Lucente Enterprises, Inc. |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
Chesapeake Custom Homes, LLC |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
Mr. Frank Lucente, Vice Chairman and a member of the Board of Directors of Old Line
Bancshares, Inc., is the President and majority owner of Lucente Enterprises, Inc. Lucente
Enterprises, Inc. is the manager and majority member of Chesapeake Custom Homes, LLC and Chesapeake
Pointer Ridge Manager, LLC.
The purpose of Pointer Ridge is to acquire, own, hold for profit, sell, assign, transfer,
operate, lease, develop, mortgage, refinance, pledge and otherwise deal with real property located
at the intersection of Pointer Ridge Road and Route 301 in Bowie, Maryland. Pointer Ridge has
acquired the property and plans to construct a commercial office building containing approximately
40,000 square feet. Old Line Bancshares, Inc. plans to lease approximately 50% of this building
for its main office (moving its existing main office from Waldorf, Maryland) and a branch of Old
Line Bank. On August 26, 2004, Old Line Bancshares, Inc. transferred its initial $550,000 capital
contribution to Pointer Ridge and on September 16, 2005
transferred an additional $182,500 to Pointers Ridge as a capital
contribution.
In April 2005, Pointer Ridge executed a contract with Waverly Construction Inc. (Waverly) to
begin construction of an approximately 40,000 square foot commercial office building at the
property. The contract sum is four million one hundred eight thousand dollars ($4,108,000). The
contract stipulates that Waverly will begin work within seven calendar days of the receipt of (1)
notice to proceed from Pointer Ridge; (2) grading permit; (3) building permit; (4) fully executed
contract; and (5) written verification from Pointer Ridge of funding for the project being in
place. Waverly has received notice to proceed and a fully executed contract from Pointer Ridge,
and a grading and building permit from Prince Georges County.
Although Waverly had not received
written
verification from Pointer Ridge that funding for the project was in place, Waverly began
construction of the project in
71
May 2005
and the building is partially complete.
Pointer
Ridge is currently in negotiations with an unrelated bank to obtain
funding for construction and permanent financing on the building. We
anticipate that the loan amount will be approximately $6,000,000 and
will contain market terms. Old Line Bancshares, Inc. will
be required to guaranty the construction of the building, and will be
required to guarantee the payment of up to fifty percent (50%) of all
costs and expenses incurred in completing the construction of the
building, provided in either case, that the lender continue to advance sums under the loan. We anticipate that the construction financing will be in
place by October 20, 2005. Prior to completion of construction
of the building, Pointer Ridge may require additional capital
contributions from its members. We anticipate moving to our new
headquarters in the first quarter of 2006.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and Old Line Bank are subject to extensive regulation under state
and federal banking laws and regulations. These laws impose specific requirements and restrictions
on virtually all aspects of operations and generally are intended to protect depositors, not
stockholders. The following discussion is only a summary and readers should refer to particular
statutory and regulatory provisions for more detailed information. In addition, management cannot
predict the nature or the extent of the effect on business and earnings that new federal or state
legislation may have in the future.
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
We are a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. We are
subject to regulation and examination by the Federal Reserve Board, and are required to file
periodic reports and any additional information that the Federal Reserve Board may require. The
Bank Holding Company Act generally prohibits a bank holding company from engaging in activities
other than banking, managing or controlling banks or other permissible subsidiaries and acquiring
or retaining direct or indirect control of any company engaged in any activities closely related to
banking or managing or controlling banks.
Historically, the Federal Reserve Board was required to approve, among other things, the
acquisition by a proposed bank holding company of control of more than five percent (5%) of the
voting shares, or substantially all the assets, of any bank, or the merger or consolidation by a
bank holding company with another bank holding company. The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and
Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the Riegle-Neal Act) repealed many of the restrictions on
interstate acquisitions of banks by bank holding companies in September, 1995. As a result of the
Riegle-Neal Act, subject to certain time and deposit base requirements, we can acquire a bank
located in Maryland or any other state, and a bank holding company located outside of Maryland can
acquire any Maryland-based bank holding company or bank.
Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company are subject to certain restrictions imposed by
statute on any extensions of credit to the bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries, or
investments in their stock or other securities, and on taking such stock or securities as
collateral for loans to any borrower. Further, a bank holding company and any of its subsidiary
banks are prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in arrangements in connection with the extension
of credit. In 1997, the Federal Reserve Board adopted amendments to its Regulation Y, creating
exceptions to the Bank Holding Company Acts anti-tying prohibitions that give bank subsidiaries of
holding companies greater flexibility in packaging products and services with their affiliates.
In accordance with Federal Reserve Board policy, Old Line Bancshares, Inc. is expected to act
as a source of financial strength to Old Line Bank and to commit resources to support Old Line Bank
in circumstances in which Old Line Bancshares, Inc. might not otherwise do so. The Federal Reserve
Board may require a bank holding company to terminate any activity or relinquish control of a
non-bank subsidiary (other than a non-bank subsidiary of a bank) upon the Federal Reserves
determination that such activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial soundness
or stability of any subsidiary depository institution of the bank holding company. Further,
federal bank regulatory authorities have additional discretion to require a bank holding company to
divest itself of any bank or non-bank subsidiary if the agency determines that divestiture may aid
the depository institutions financial condition.
The Federal Reserve Board imposes risk-based capital measures on bank holding companies in
order to insure their capital adequacy. Because Old Line Bancshares, Inc. is a bank holding
company with less than $150,000,000 in assets, Old Line Bancshares, Inc. is currently exempt from
most of these risk-based capital measures. However, the Federal Reserve Board still requires that
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. remain adequately capitalized and have the ability to retire any debt
within 25 years from the date it is incurred.
72
Old Line Bancshares, Inc., as a bank holding company, is subject to dividend regulations of
the Federal Reserve System. In general, a small bank holding company that has a debt to equity
ratio greater than 1:1 is not expected to pay corporate dividends until such time as its debt to
equity ratio declines to 1:1 or less and its bank subsidiary is otherwise well managed, well
capitalized and not under any supervisory order. Old Line Bancshares, Inc. is a small bank holding
company.
On November 12, 1999, President Clinton signed into law the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA).
Effective March 11, 2000, pursuant to authority granted under the GLBA, a bank holding company may
elect to become a financial holding company and thereby engage in a broader range of financial and
other activities than are permissible for traditional bank holding companies. In order to qualify
for the election, all of the depository institution subsidiaries of the bank holding company must
be well capitalized and well managed, as defined by regulation, and all of its depository
institution subsidiaries must have achieved a rating of satisfactory or better with respect to
meeting community credit needs.
Pursuant to the GLBA, financial holding companies are permitted to engage in activities that
are financial in nature or incidental or complementary thereto and not a substantial risk to the
safety and soundness of the depository institution or the financial system in general, as
determined by the Federal Reserve Board. The GLBA identifies several activities as financial in
nature, including, among others, insurance underwriting and agency, investment advisory services,
merchant banking and underwriting, and dealing or making a market in securities. Being designated
a financial holding company will allow insurance companies, securities brokers and other types of
financial companies to affiliate with and/or acquire depository institutions. Old Line Bancshares,
Inc. does not currently intend to become a financial holding company.
Under Maryland law, an existing bank holding company that desires to acquire a Maryland
state-chartered bank or trust company, a federally chartered bank with its main office in Maryland,
or a bank holding company that has its principal place of business in Maryland, must file an
application with the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation. In approving the application,
the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation must consider whether the acquisition may be
detrimental to the safety and soundness of the entity being acquired or whether the acquisition may
result in an undue concentration of resources or a substantial reduction in competition in
Maryland. The Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation may not approve an acquisition if, on
consummation of the transaction, the acquiring company, together with all its insured depository
institution affiliates, would control 30% or more of the total amount of deposits of insured
depository institutions in Maryland. The Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation has
authority to adopt by regulation a procedure to waive this requirement for good cause. In a
transaction for which approval of the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation is not required
due to an exemption under Maryland law, or for which federal law authorizes the transaction without
application to the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation, the parties to the acquisition
must provide written notice to the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation at least 15 days
before the effective date of the transaction.
The status of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as a registered bank holding company under the Bank
Holding Company Act and a Maryland-chartered bank holding company does not exempt it from certain
federal and state laws and regulations applicable to corporations generally, including, without
limitation, certain provisions of the federal securities laws.
Old Line Bank
Old Line Bank is a Maryland chartered trust company (with all powers of a commercial bank), is
a member of the Federal Reserve System (a state member bank) and the Bank Insurance Fund of the
FDIC insures its deposit accounts up to the maximum legal limits of the FDIC. It is subject to
regulation, supervision and regular examination by the Maryland Commissioner of Financial
Regulation and the Federal Reserve Board. The regulations of these various agencies govern most
aspects of Old Line Banks business, including required reserves against deposits, loans,
investments, mergers and acquisitions, borrowing, dividends and location and number of branch
offices. The laws and regulations governing Old Line Bank generally have been promulgated to
protect depositors and the deposit insurance funds, and not for the purpose of protecting
stockholders.
73
Branching and Interstate Banking
The federal banking agencies are authorized to approve interstate bank merger transactions
without regard to whether such transactions are prohibited by the law of any state, unless the home
state of one of the banks has opted out of the interstate bank merger provisions of the Riegle-Neal
Act by adopting a law after the date of enactment of the Riegle-Neal Act and prior to June 1, 1997
which applies equally to all out-of-state banks and expressly prohibits merger transactions
involving out-of-state banks. Interstate acquisitions of branches are permitted only if the law of
the state in which the branch is located permits such acquisitions. Such interstate bank mergers
and branch acquisitions are also subject to the nationwide and statewide insured deposit
concentration limitations described in the Riegle-Neal Act.
The Riegle-Neal Act authorizes the federal banking agencies to approve interstate branching de
novo by national and state banks in states that specifically allow for such branching. The District
of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia have all enacted laws that permit interstate acquisitions of
banks and bank branches and permit out-of-state banks to establish de novo branches.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
The GLBA altered substantially the statutory framework for providing banking and other
financial services in the United States of America. The GLBA, among other things, eliminated many
of the restrictions on affiliations among banks and securities firms, insurance firms, and other
financial service providers.
The GLBA also provides protections against the transfer and use by financial institutions of
consumers nonpublic personal information. A financial institution must provide to its customers,
at the beginning of the customer relationship and annually thereafter, the institutions policies
and procedures regarding the handling of customers nonpublic personal financial information. The
privacy provisions generally prohibit a financial institution from providing a customers personal
financial information to unaffiliated third parties unless the institution discloses to the
customer that the information may be so provided and the customer is given the opportunity to opt
out of such disclosure.
Capital Adequacy Guidelines
The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have adopted risk based capital adequacy guidelines
pursuant to which they assess the adequacy of capital in examining and supervising banks and in
analyzing bank regulatory applications. Risk-based capital requirements determine the adequacy of
capital based on the risk inherent in various classes of assets and off-balance sheet items.
State member banks are expected to meet a minimum ratio of total qualifying capital (the sum
of core capital (Tier 1) and supplementary capital (Tier 2)) to risk weighted assets of 8%. At
least half of this amount (4%) should be in the form of core capital. In general, this requirement
is similar to the capital that a bank must have in order to be considered adequately capitalized
under the prompt corrective action regulations. See - Prompt Corrective Action. Old Line Bank
currently complies with this minimum requirement.
Tier 1 Capital generally consists of the sum of common stockholders equity and perpetual
preferred stock (subject in the case of the latter to limitations on the kind and amount of such
stock which may be included as Tier 1 Capital), less goodwill, without adjustment for changes in
the market value of securities classified as available for sale in accordance with FAS 115. Tier
2 Capital consists of the following: hybrid capital instruments; perpetual preferred stock which is
not otherwise eligible to be included as Tier 1 Capital; term subordinated debt and
intermediate-term preferred stock; and, subject to limitations, general allowances for loan losses.
Assets are adjusted under the risk-based guidelines to take into account different risk
characteristics, with the categories ranging from 0% (requiring no risk-based capital) for assets
such as cash, to 100% for the bulk of assets which are typically held by a commercial bank,
including certain multi-family residential and commercial real estate loans, commercial business
loans and consumer loans. Residential first mortgage loans on one to four family residential real
estate and certain seasoned multi-family residential real estate loans, which are not 90 days or
more past-due or non-performing and which have been made in accordance with prudent underwriting
standards are assigned a 50% level in the risk-weighing system, as are certain privately-issued
mortgage-backed securities representing indirect
74
ownership of such loans. Off-balance sheet items also are adjusted to take into account
certain risk characteristics.
In addition to the risk-based capital requirements, the Federal Reserve Board has established
a minimum 3.0% Leverage Capital Ratio (Tier 1 Capital to total adjusted assets) requirement for the
most highly-rated banks, with an additional cushion of at least 100 to 200 basis points for all
other banks, which effectively increases the minimum Leverage Capital Ratio for such other banks to
4.0% 5.0% or more. The highest-rated banks are those that are not anticipating or experiencing
significant growth and have well diversified risk, including no undue interest rate risk exposure,
excellent asset quality, high liquidity, good earnings and, in general, those which are considered
a strong banking organization. A bank having less than the minimum Leverage Capital Ratio
requirement shall, within 60 days of the date as of which it fails to comply with such requirement,
submit a reasonable plan describing the means and timing by which the bank shall achieve its
minimum Leverage Capital Ratio requirement. A bank which fails to file such plan is deemed to be
operating in an unsafe and unsound manner, and could be subject to a cease-and-desist order. Any
insured depository institution with a Leverage Capital Ratio that is less than 2.0% is deemed to be
operating in an unsafe or unsound condition pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act (the FDIA) and is subject to potential termination of deposit insurance. However,
such an institution will not be subject to an enforcement proceeding solely on account of its
capital ratios if it has entered into and is in compliance with a written agreement to increase its
Leverage Capital Ratio and to take such other action as may be necessary for the institution to be
operated in a safe and sound manner. The capital regulations also provide, among other things, for
the issuance of a capital directive, which is a final order issued to a bank that fails to maintain
minimum capital or to restore its capital to the minimum capital requirement within a specified
time period.
Prompt Corrective Action
Under Section 38 of the FDIA, each federal banking agency is required to implement a system of
prompt corrective action for institutions that it regulates. The federal banking agencies have
promulgated substantially similar regulations to implement the system of prompt corrective action
established by Section 38 of the FDIA. Under the regulations, a bank will be deemed to be: (i)
well capitalized if it has a Total Risk Based Capital Ratio of 10.0% or more, a Tier 1 Risk Based
Capital Ratio of 6.0% or more, a Leverage Capital Ratio of 5.0% or more and is not subject to any
written capital order or directive; (ii) adequately capitalized if it has a Total Risk Based
Capital Ratio of 8.0% or more, a Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio of 4.0% or more and a Tier 1
Leverage Capital Ratio of 4.0% or more (3.0% under certain circumstances) and does not meet the
definition of well capitalized; (iii) undercapitalized if it has a Total Risk Based Capital
Ratio that is less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 Risk based Capital Ratio that is less than 4.0% or a
Leverage Capital Ratio that is less than 4.0% (3.0% under certain circumstances); (iv)
significantly undercapitalized if it has a Total Risk Based Capital Ratio that is less than 6.0%,
a Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio that is less than 3.0% or a Leverage Capital Ratio that is less
than 3.0%; and (v) critically undercapitalized if it has a ratio of tangible equity to total
assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%.
An institution generally must file a written capital restoration plan which meets specified
requirements with an appropriate federal banking agency within 45 days of the date the institution
receives notice or is deemed to have notice that it is undercapitalized, significantly
undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized. A federal banking agency must provide the
institution with written notice of approval or disapproval within 60 days after receiving a capital
restoration plan, subject to extensions by the applicable agency.
An institution that is required to submit a capital restoration plan must concurrently submit
a performance guaranty by each company that controls the institution. Such guaranty will be limited
to the lesser of (i) an amount equal to 5.0% of the institutions total assets at the time the
institution was notified or deemed to have notice that it was undercapitalized or (ii) the amount
necessary at such time to restore the relevant capital measures of the institution to the levels
required for the institution to be classified as adequately capitalized. Such a guaranty shall
expire after the federal banking agency notifies the institution that it has remained adequately
capitalized for each of four consecutive calendar quarters. An institution which fails to submit a
written capital restoration plan within the requisite period, including any required performance
guaranty, or fails in any material respect to implement a capital restoration plan, will be subject
to the restrictions in Section 38 of the FDIA which are applicable to significantly
undercapitalized institutions.
A critically undercapitalized institution is to be placed in conservatorship or receivership
within 90 days
75
unless the FDIC formally determines that forbearance from such action would better protect the
deposit insurance fund. Unless the FDIC or other appropriate federal banking regulatory agency
makes specific further findings and certifies that the institution is viable and is not expected to
fail, an institution that remains critically undercapitalized on average during the fourth calendar
quarter after the date it becomes critically undercapitalized must be placed in receivership. The
general rule is that the FDIC will be appointed as receiver within 90 days after a bank becomes
critically undercapitalized unless extremely good cause is shown and the federal regulators agree
to an extension. In general, good cause is defined as capital that has been raised and is
immediately available for infusion into the bank except for certain technical requirements that may
delay the infusion for a period of time beyond the 90 day time period.
Immediately upon becoming undercapitalized, an institution will become subject to the
provisions of Section 38 of the FDIA, which (i) restrict payment of capital distributions and
management fees; (ii) require that the appropriate federal banking agency monitor the condition of
the institution and its efforts to restore its capital; (iii) require submission of a capital
restoration plan; (iv) restrict the growth of the institutions assets; and (v) require prior
approval of certain expansion proposals. The appropriate federal banking agency for an
undercapitalized institution also may take any number of discretionary supervisory actions if the
agency determines that any of these actions is necessary to resolve the problems of the institution
at the least possible long-term cost to the deposit insurance fund, subject in certain cases to
specified procedures. These discretionary supervisory actions include: requiring the institution
to raise additional capital, restricting transactions with affiliates, requiring divestiture of the
institution or the sale of the institution to a willing purchaser, and any other supervisory action
that the agency deems appropriate. These and additional mandatory and permissive supervisory
actions may be taken with respect to significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized
institutions.
Additionally, under Section 11(c)(5) of the FDIA, a conservator or receiver may be appointed
for an institution where: (i) an institutions obligations exceed its assets; (ii) there is
substantial dissipation of the institutions assets or earnings as a result of any violation of law
or any unsafe or unsound practice; (iii) the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition; (iv)
there is a willful violation of a cease-and-desist order; (v) the institution is unable to pay its
obligations in the ordinary course of business; (vi) losses or threatened losses deplete all or
substantially all of an institutions capital, and there is no reasonable prospect of becoming
adequately capitalized without assistance; (vii) there is any violation of law or unsafe or
unsound practice or condition that is likely to cause insolvency or substantial dissipation of
assets or earnings, weaken the institutions condition, or otherwise seriously prejudice the
interests of depositors or the insurance fund; (viii) an institution ceases to be insured; (ix) the
institution is undercapitalized and has no reasonable prospect that it will become adequately
capitalized, fails to become adequately capitalized when required to do so, or fails to submit or
materially implement a capital restoration plan; or (x) the institution is critically
undercapitalized or otherwise has substantially insufficient capital.
Currently, Old Line Bank is well capitalized under the prompt corrective actions regulations
described above.
Regulatory Enforcement Authority
Federal banking law grants substantial enforcement powers to federal banking regulators. This
enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to
issue cease-and-desist or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions against banking
organizations and institution-affiliated parties. In general, these enforcement actions may be
initiated for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Other actions or
inactions may provide the basis for enforcement action, including misleading or untimely reports
filed with regulatory authorities.
Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders
Maryland law imposes restrictions on certain transactions with affiliates of Maryland
commercial banks. Generally, under Maryland law, a director, officer or employee of a commercial
bank may not borrow, directly or indirectly, any money from the bank, unless the loan has been
approved by a resolution adopted by and recorded in the minutes of the board of directors of the
bank, or the executive committee of the bank, if that committee is authorized to make loans. If
the executive committee approves such a loan, the loan approval must be reported to
76
the board of directors at its next meeting. Certain commercial loans made to directors of a
bank and certain consumer loans made to non-officer employees of the bank are exempt from the laws
coverage.
In addition, Old Line Bank is subject to the provisions of Section 23A of the Federal Reserve
Act, which limits the amount of loans or extensions of credit to, investments in, or certain other
transactions with, affiliates, and limits the amount of advances to third parties collateralized by
the securities or obligations of affiliates. Section 23A limits the aggregate amount of
transactions with any individual affiliate to ten percent (10%) of the capital and surplus of Old
Line Bank and also limits the aggregate amount of transactions with all affiliates to twenty
percent (20%) of capital and surplus. Loans and certain other extensions of credit to affiliates
are required to be secured by collateral in an amount and of a type described in Section 23A, and
the purchase of low quality assets from affiliates is generally prohibited.
Old Line Bank also is subject to the provisions of Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act
which, among other things, prohibits an institution from engaging in certain transactions with
certain affiliates unless the transactions are on terms substantially the same, or at least as
favorable to such institution and or its subsidiaries, as those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions with non-affiliated entities. In the absence of comparable transactions,
such transactions may only occur under terms and circumstances, including credit standards that in
good faith would be offered to or would apply to non-affiliated companies.
We have entered into banking transactions with our directors and executive officers and the
business and professional organizations in which they are associated in the ordinary course of
business. Any loans and loan commitments are made in accordance with all applicable laws. See
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
Loans to One Borrower
Old Line Bank is subject to the statutory and regulatory limits on the extension of credit to
one borrower. Generally, the maximum amount of total outstanding loans that a Maryland chartered
trust company may have to any one borrower at any one time is 15% of Old Line Banks unimpaired
capital and surplus. As of June 30, 2005, we were able to lend $2.1 million to any one borrower.
This amount is significantly less than that of many of our competitors.
Liquidity
Old Line Bank is subject to the reserve requirements imposed by the State of Maryland. A
Maryland commercial bank is required to have at all times a reserve equal to at least 15% of its
demand deposits. Old Line Bank is also subject to the reserve requirements of Federal Reserve
Board Regulation D, which applies to all depository institutions. Specifically, as of June 30,
2005, amounts in transaction accounts above $7,000,000 and up to $47,600,000 must have reserves
held against them in the ratio of three percent of the amount. Amounts above $47,600,000 require
reserves of $1,218,000 plus 10 percent of the amount in excess of $47,600,000. The Maryland
reserve requirements may be used to satisfy the requirements of Federal Reserve Regulation D. Old
Line Bank is in compliance with its reserve requirements.
Dividends
Under Maryland law, Old Line Bank may declare a cash dividend, after providing for due or
accrued expenses, losses, interest, and taxes, from its undivided profits or, with the prior
approval of the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation, from its surplus in excess of 100%
of its required capital stock. Also, if Old Line Banks surplus is less than 100% of its required
capital stock, cash dividends may not be paid in excess of 90% of net earnings. In addition to
these specific restrictions, the bank regulatory agencies have the ability to prohibit or limit
proposed dividends if such regulatory agencies determine the payment of such dividends would result
in Old Line Bank being in an unsafe and unsound condition.
Community Reinvestment Act
Old Line Bank is required to comply with the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regardless of
its
77
capital condition. The CRA requires that, in connection with its examinations of Old Line
Bank, the Federal Reserve evaluates the record of Old Line Bank in meeting the credit needs of its
local community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and
sound operation of the institution. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or
programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institutions discretion to develop the
types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community,
consistent with the CRA. These factors are considered in evaluating mergers, acquisitions and
applications to open a branch or facility. The CRA also requires all institutions to make public
disclosure of their CRA ratings. Old Line Bank received a Satisfactory rating in its latest CRA
examination.
USA PATRIOT Act
On October 26, 2001, President Bush signed into law comprehensive anti-terrorism legislation
known as the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the USA Patriot Act). Title III of the USA Patriot Act
substantially broadened the scope of U.S. anti-money laundering laws and regulations by imposing
significant new compliance and due diligence obligations, creating new crimes and penalties and
expanding the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the United States. The U.S. Treasury Department
(Treasury) has issued a number of implementing regulations that apply various requirements of the
USA Patriot Act to financial institutions such as Old Line Bank. Those regulations impose new
obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls to
detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing. Treasury is expected to issue
a number of additional regulations that will further clarify the USA Patriot Acts requirements.
Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA Patriot Acts requirements could
have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution. Old Line Bank has adopted
appropriate policies, procedures and controls to address compliance with the requirements of the
USA Patriot Act under the existing regulations and will continue to revise and update its policies,
procedures and controls to reflect changes required by the USA Patriot Act and Treasurys
regulations.
78
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
Our authorized capital stock consists of 5,000,000 shares of our common stock, $0.01 par
value, and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value. As of the date of this
prospectus, 2,152,360.5 shares of common stock are issued and outstanding and held by approximately
296 stockholders of record. In addition, options to purchase 126,820 shares of common stock are
outstanding as of the date of this prospectus. The following summary of certain terms of our
common stock and preferred stock is necessarily general and reference should be made in each case
to our charter and bylaws that are filed as exhibits to the Registration Statement of which this
prospectus is a part, copies of which may be obtained from the Securities and Exchange Commission.
See Where You Can Find More Information.
In general, stockholders or subscribers for our stock have no personal liability for the debts
and obligations of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. because of their status as stockholders or
subscribers, except to the extent that the subscription price or other agreed consideration for the
stock has not been paid.
Common Stock
We are authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share. Upon
completion of the offering, including the shares of common stock currently issued and outstanding,
a maximum of 3,652,360.5 shares of common stock will be issued and outstanding, excluding up to
225,000 additional shares that we may offer (and not including any shares issuable upon the
exercise of our outstanding options).
The outstanding shares of common stock currently are, and the shares of common stock to be
issued in the offering will be, upon payment as described in this prospectus, fully paid and
non-assessable. Subject to all rights of holders of any other class or series of stock, holders of
common stock are entitled to receive dividends if and when our Board of Directors declares
dividends from funds legally available. In addition, holders of common stock share ratably in our
net assets upon the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our
operations, after distributions are made to anyone with more senior rights.
In general, each outstanding share of common stock entitles the holder to vote for the
election of directors and on all other matters requiring stockholder action, and each share is
entitled to one vote. Holders of common stock have no conversion, sinking fund, redemption rights
or preemptive rights to subscribe to any of our equity securities.
Preferred Stock
We are authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
Shares of preferred stock may be issued from time to time by the Board of Directors in one or more
series. Prior to issuance of shares of each series of preferred stock, the Board of Directors is
required to fix for each series the designation, preferences, conversion and other rights, voting
powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends, qualifications and terms or conditions of
redemption. The Board of Directors will not offer shares of preferred
stock to promoters except on the same terms as it is offered to all
existing or new stockholders and such issuance is approved by a
majority of the independent directors. The Board of Directors could authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock with
terms and conditions which could have the effect of discouraging a takeover or other transaction
which some of our stockholders might believe to be in their best interests or in which they might
receive a premium for their shares of common stock over the market price of such shares. As of the
date hereof, we have no present plans to issue any preferred stock.
Anti-Takeover Provisions in our Charter and Bylaws
General. A number of provisions of our charter and bylaws deal with matters of corporate
governance and certain rights of stockholders. The following discussion is a general summary of
certain provisions of our charter and bylaws that might be deemed to have a potential
anti-takeover effect. The following description of certain of the provisions of our charter and
bylaws is necessarily general and reference should be made in each case to the charter and bylaws.
79
Extraordinary Transactions. Our charter provides that certain business combination (as
defined in the charter) transactions between us and any person who is the beneficial owner,
directly or indirectly, of more than fifteen percent (15%) of the shares of our capital stock
entitled to vote in the election of directors (an interested stockholder) (or between us and an
affiliate of the interested stockholder) require a supermajority vote of 80% of the total
outstanding shares of our capital stock unless a majority of our disinterested directors (as
defined in the charter) approve the business combination or unless certain fair price provisions
are satisfied. In general, the charter defines business combination as:
|
|
|
Any merger or consolidation of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. or any subsidiary of Old
Line Bancshares, Inc. with an interested stockholder; |
|
|
|
|
Any sale, lease, license, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition
to or with any interested stockholder or any affiliate of any interested stockholder of
any assets of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. or any subsidiary of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
having an aggregate fair market value equal to or greater than ten percent of the
combined assets of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
The issuance or transfer by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. or any subsidiary of Old Line
Bancshares, Inc. of any securities of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. or any subsidiary to
any interested stockholder or any affiliate of any interested stockholder in exchange
for cash, securities or other property (or a combination thereof) having an aggregate
fair market value equal to or greater than ten percent of the combined assets of Old
Line Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries, except pursuant to an employee benefit plan
of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. or any subsidiary; |
|
|
|
|
Any reclassification or recapitalization of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. or any
subsidiary of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. or any other transaction (whether or not with
or into or otherwise involving an interested stockholder) which has the effect,
directly or indirectly, of increasing the proportionate share of the outstanding shares
of any class of equity or convertible securities of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. or any
subsidiary which are directly or indirectly owned by any interested stockholder or any
affiliate of any interested stockholder; or |
|
|
|
|
The adoption of any plan or proposal for the liquidation or dissolution of Old Line
Bancshares, Inc. proposed by or on behalf of an interested stockholder or any affiliate
of any interested stockholder. |
In general, the charter defines the term disinterested director as any person who is not an
affiliate or associate of the interested stockholder and who was a member of the Board of Directors
prior to the time that the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder.
Classification of the Board of Directors. Our charter and bylaws provide that we shall have
not less than five nor more than 25 directors, the exact number to be fixed by the Board of
Directors, and that the number of directors may be increased or decreased by the Board of
Directors. Our directors are divided into three classes Class A, Class B and Class C each
class consisting of an equal number of directors, or as nearly equal as possible and each director
serves for a term ending on the date of the third annual meeting following the annual meeting at
which such director was elected. We believe that a classified board promotes continuity and
stability of management but makes it more difficult for stockholders to change a majority of the
directors because it generally takes at least two annual elections of directors for this to occur.
We believe that classification of our board of directors will help to assure the continuity and
stability of our business strategies and policies as determined by the Board of Directors.
Absence Of Cumulative Voting. There is no cumulative voting in the election of our directors.
Cumulative voting means that holders of stock of a corporation are entitled, in the election of
directors, to cast a number of votes equal to the number of shares that they own multiplied by the
number of directors to be elected. Because a stockholder entitled to cumulative voting may cast
all of his votes for one nominee or disperse his votes among nominees as he chooses, cumulative
voting is generally considered to increase the ability of minority stockholders to elect nominees
to a corporations board of directors. The absence of cumulative voting means that
80
the holders of a majority of our shares can elect all of the directors then standing for
election and the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any directors.
Removal of Directors. Our charter and bylaws provide that a director may only be removed by
the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors
and only for cause.
Amendment Of Charter and Bylaws. Our charter and bylaws generally provides that amendments to
the charter or bylaws that would impact anti-takeover provisions must be approved by the holders of
at least 80% of the shares entitled to be voted on the matter.
Authorized Shares. Our charter authorizes the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of common stock
and authorizes the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The authorization of shares of
common and preferred stock in excess of the amount issued provides our Board of Directors with
flexibility to effect, among other transactions, financings, acquisitions, stock dividends, stock
splits and stock options or other stock based compensation. The unissued authorized shares may
also be used by the Board of Directors consistent with its fiduciary duty to deter future attempts
to gain control of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. Also, as indicated above, the Board of Directors
right to set the terms of one or more series of preferred stock has anti-takeover effects.
Procedures For Stockholder Nominations and Proposals. For nominations for election to the
Board of Directors outside of the procedures established in the charter of our nominating
committee, as described above, and even if the proposal is not to be included in our proxy
statement, pursuant to our bylaws a stockholder must give notice in writing to the President of Old
Line Bancshares, Inc. not less than 14 days nor more than 50 days prior to the date of the meeting
called for the election of directors, provided, however, that if less than 21 days notice of the
meeting is given to stockholders, such nomination must be mailed or delivered to the President not
later than the close of business on the fifth business day following the date on which the notice
was mailed. At the discretion of the chair of any stockholder meeting, nominations that fail to
follow the prescribed procedures will not be considered. We believe that it is in our and our
stockholders best interests to provide sufficient time to enable management to disclose to
stockholders information about a dissident slate of nominations for directors. This advance notice
requirement also may give management time to solicit its own proxies in an attempt to defeat any
dissident slate of nominations should management determine that doing so is in the best interest of
stockholders generally. For shareholder proposals to be included in our proxy materials, the
stockholder must comply with all timing and information requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.
Limitations On Liabilities. Our charter provides that the personal liability of our directors
and officers for monetary damages is eliminated except:
|
|
|
To the extent that it is proved that the person actually received an
improper benefit or profit in money, property, or services for the amount of
the benefit or profit in money, property, or services actually received; |
|
|
|
|
To the extent that a judgment or other final adjudication adverse to the
person is entered in a proceeding based on a finding in the proceeding that the
persons action, or failure to act, was the result of active and deliberate
dishonesty and was material to the cause of action adjudicated in the
proceeding; and |
|
|
|
|
To the extent an administrative proceeding or action is instituted by an
appropriate bank regulatory agency which proceeding or actions results in a
final order requiring affirmative action by an individual or individuals in the
form of payment to Old Line Bancshares, Inc. |
Our charter also provides that we will indemnify our officers and directors against
liabilities and, in certain circumstances, will advance expenses to such persons prior to a final
disposition of an action. Also, the rights of indemnification provided in our charter are not
exclusive of any other rights which may be available under any insurance or other agreement, by
resolution of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.
These provisions are designed to reduce, in appropriate cases, the risks incident to serving
as a director, officer, employee or agent and to enable us to attract and retain the best personnel
available.
81
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling us under provisions of our
charter, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
and is therefore unenforceable.
Anti-Takeover Provisions in the MGCL
In addition to the provisions contained in our charter and bylaws, the MGCL includes certain
provisions applicable to Maryland corporations that may have an anti-takeover effect, including,
but not limited to, the provisions discussed below.
Business Combinations. Under the MGCL, certain business combinations between a Maryland
corporation and an Interested Stockholder (as described in the MGCL) are prohibited for five
years after the most recent date on which the Interested Stockholder became an Interested
Stockholder, unless an exemption is available. Thereafter a business combination must be
recommended by the board of directors of the corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at
least: (i) 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding voting shares of the
corporation and (ii) two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding voting
shares of the corporation other than shares held by the Interested Stockholder with whom the
business combination is to be effected, unless the corporations stockholders receive a minimum
price (as described in the MGCL) for their shares and the consideration is received in cash or in
the same form as previously paid by the Interested Stockholder for its shares. These provisions of
Maryland law do not apply, however, to business combinations that are approved or exempted by the
Board of Directors prior to the time that the Interested Stockholder becomes an Interested
Stockholder. They also do not apply if the company has fewer than 100 beneficial owners of stock.
Control Share Acquisitions. The MGCL provides that control shares of a Maryland corporation
acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a
vote of two-thirds of the shares entitled to be voted on the matter, excluding shares of stock
owned by the acquirer or by officers or directors who are employees of the corporation. Control
shares are voting shares of stock which, if aggregated with all other such shares of stock
previously acquired by the acquirer, or in respect of which the acquirer is able to exercise or
direct the exercise of voting power except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy, would entitle the
acquirer to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the following ranges of
voting power: (i) one-tenth or more but less than one-third; (ii) one-third or more but less than a
majority or (iii) a majority of all voting power. Control shares do not include shares the
acquiring person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained stockholder
approval. A control share acquisition means the acquisition of control shares, subject to
certain exceptions.
A person who has made or proposes to make a control share acquisition, upon satisfaction of
certain conditions (including an undertaking to pay expenses and delivery of an acquiring person
statement), may compel the corporations board of directors to call a special meeting of
stockholders to be held within 50 days of demand to consider the voting rights of the shares. If
no request for a meeting is made, the corporation may itself present the question at any
stockholders meeting.
Unless the charter or bylaws provide otherwise, if voting rights are not approved at the
meeting or if the acquiring person does not deliver an acquiring person statement within 10 days
following a control share acquisition then, subject to certain conditions and limitations, the
corporation may redeem any or all of the control shares (except those for which voting rights have
previously been approved) for fair value determined, without regard to the absence of voting rights
for the control shares, as of the date of the last control share acquisition or of any meeting of
stockholders at which the voting rights of such shares are considered and not approved. Moreover,
unless the charter or bylaws provides otherwise, if voting rights for control shares are approved
at a stockholders meeting and the acquirer becomes entitled to exercise or direct the exercise of
a majority or more of all voting power, other stockholders may exercise appraisal rights. The fair
value of the shares as determined for purposes of such appraisal rights may not be less than the
highest price per share paid by the acquirer in the control share acquisition.
82
Summary of Anti-Takeover Provisions
The foregoing provisions of our charter and bylaws and Maryland law could have the effect of
discouraging an acquisition of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. or stock purchases in furtherance of an
acquisition, and could accordingly, under certain circumstances, discourage transactions that might
otherwise have a favorable effect on the price of our common stock. In addition, such provisions
may make Old Line Bancshares, Inc. less attractive to a potential acquiror and/or might result in
stockholders receiving a lesser amount of consideration for their shares of common stock than
otherwise could have been available.
Our Board of Directors believes that the provisions described above are prudent and will
reduce vulnerability to takeover attempts and certain other transactions that are not negotiated
with and approved by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors believes that these provisions
are in Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s best interests and the best interests of its stockholders. In
the Board of Directors judgment, the Board of Directors is in the best position to determine our
true value and to negotiate more effectively for what may be in the best interests of the
stockholders. Accordingly, the Board of Directors believes that it is in Old Line Bancshares,
Inc.s best interests and in the best interests of its stockholders to encourage potential
acquirors to negotiate directly with the Board of Directors and that these provisions will
encourage such negotiations and discourage hostile takeover attempts. It is also the Board of
Directors view that these provisions should not discourage persons from proposing a merger or
other transaction at prices reflective of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s true value and where the
transaction is in the best interests of all stockholders.
Despite the Board of Directors belief as to the benefits to Old Line Bancshares, Inc. of the
foregoing provisions, these provisions also may have the effect of discouraging a future takeover
attempt in which stockholders might receive a substantial premium for their shares over then
current market prices and may tend to perpetuate existing management. As a result, stockholders
who might desire to participate in such a transaction may not have an opportunity to do so. The
Board of Directors, however, believes that the potential benefits of these provisions outweigh
their possible disadvantages.
Transfer Agent
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company serves as our transfer agent.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
McKinnon & Company, Inc., 999 Waterside Drive, Suite 1200, Norfolk, Virginia, has agreed,
subject to the terms and conditions contained in an underwriting agreement with us, to sell, as
selling agent for us on a best efforts basis, 1,500,000 shares of common stock. McKinnon &
Company, Inc. has also agreed to sell on a best efforts basis up to 225,000 additional shares that
we may offer. Because the offering is on a best efforts basis and there is no minimum number of
shares to be sold, McKinnon & Company, Inc. is not obligated to purchase any shares if they are not
sold to the public, and McKinnon & Company, Inc. is not required to sell any specific number or
dollar amount of shares. McKinnon & Company, Inc. is a member of the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. and an SEC-registered broker-dealer.
McKinnon & Company, Inc. has informed us that it proposes to sell the common stock as selling
agent for us subject to prior sale, when, as and if issued by us in part to the public at the
public offering prices set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and in part through certain
selected dealers that are members of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. to
customers of such selected dealers at the public offering price. Each selected dealer will receive
a commission of $0.___for each share that it sells. Purchasers are required to have an account
either with McKinnon & Company, Inc. or a selected dealer to purchase shares of common stock in the
offering. However, McKinnon & Company, Inc. has no obligation to open an account for any
prospective investor. McKinnon & Company, Inc. reserves the right to reject any order for the
purchase of shares through it in whole or in part.
At
closing, McKinnon & Company, Inc. will notify all prospective
investors, directly or
through a selected dealer, of the number of shares to be purchased.
The investors, through their
dealers, will transmit their purchase funds to the escrow agent by
wire transmission. The independent escrow agent is SunTrust Bank, a
Georgia banking corporation. The purpose of the escrow is to
facilitate the closing process. The release of funds from escrow is
not dependent upon our raising any specific amounts in this offering
or any other event. McKinnon &
Company, Inc. will not purchase or
83
otherwise take ownership of any shares. Closing is expected to occur on or about October___, 2005.
We will pay McKinnon & Company, Inc. a commission equal to five percent of the aggregate sales price of the shares sold in the offering.
We determined the offering price through negotiations with McKinnon & Company, Inc. In determining the offering price, we considered the following factors, among others:
the per share book value of the common stock as of June 30, 2005 and as of December 31, 2004, the trading history of the common stock, including the frequency and volume of trades and
actual trading prices, but not necessarily the current quoted or last sale price; the history and our prospects and those of Old line Bank; our past and present earnings, trend of
such earnings and the prospects for future earnings; the current performance and prospects of the banking industry in which we compete; the general condition of the securities market
at the time of the offering and the prices of equity securities of other community banks.
McKinnon & Company, Inc. has advised us that it will use its best efforts to make a market in our common stock for a period of at least two years after the closing of the
offering as long as we remain listed on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market or other exchange and remain current in our periodic reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
We have agreed to indemnify and hold harmless McKinnon & Company, Inc. and the persons who control it against certain liabilities, including liability under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended. Under certain conditions, we have agreed to contribute to any payment that McKinnon & Company, Inc. may be required to make for such indemnified
liabilities. In addition, we have agreed to reimburse McKinnon & Company, Inc. for its expenses, including any legal fees, that it incurs in connection with the offering.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus and certain other legal matters will be passed upon by the law firm Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, a
Professional Corporation, 120 East Baltimore Street, Baltimore, Maryland.
EXPERTS
The audited financial statements of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and Old Line Bank included in this prospectus and in the registration statement have been audited by Rowles &
Company, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, as set forth in their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein and in the registration statement and are included in
reliance upon such report given upon the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We are subject to the information requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and we file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and
other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may read and copy any document that we file at the SECs public reference room facility located at 100 F Street,
N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. The SEC also maintains an Internet site at
http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers, including us, that file documents with the SEC electronically
through the SECs electronic data gathering, analysis and retrieval system known as EDGAR. On EDGAR, our reports are listed under Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
This prospectus is part of a registration statement we have filed with the SEC. Because the rules and regulations of the SEC allow us to omit certain portions of the registration
statement from this prospectus, this prospectus does not contain all the information set forth in the registration statement. You may review the registration statement and the
exhibits filed with the registration statement for further information regarding us and the shares of our common stock being offered by this prospectus. The registration statement
and its exhibits may be inspected at the public reference facility of the SEC at the locations described above.
84
OLD LINE BANCSHARES, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
Unaudited Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2005 (unaudited) and December 31, 2004 (audited) |
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004 (unaudited) |
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity for the six months ended
June 30, 2005 (unaudited) |
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004 (unaudited) |
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
F-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 |
|
|
F-11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 |
|
|
F-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 |
|
|
F-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 |
|
|
F-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
F-16 |
|
F-1
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
3,691,558 |
|
|
$ |
4,090,776 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
15,293,025 |
|
|
|
5,229,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
18,984,583 |
|
|
|
9,320,643 |
|
Time deposits in other banks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
14,667,271 |
|
|
|
15,612,411 |
|
Investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
2,203,871 |
|
|
|
2,204,290 |
|
Loans, less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
91,282,412 |
|
|
|
81,504,890 |
|
Restricted equity securities at cost |
|
|
1,127,750 |
|
|
|
1,079,950 |
|
Investment in real estate, LLC |
|
|
549,936 |
|
|
|
550,000 |
|
Bank premises and equipment |
|
|
2,371,974 |
|
|
|
2,352,348 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
418,019 |
|
|
|
365,388 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
130,282 |
|
|
|
88,723 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
3,250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
224,987 |
|
|
|
190,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
135,211,085 |
|
|
$ |
113,569,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
26,879,406 |
|
|
$ |
25,424,314 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
79,112,535 |
|
|
|
63,540,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
105,991,941 |
|
|
|
88,965,114 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
8,876,795 |
|
|
|
4,637,012 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
244,196 |
|
|
|
173,320 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
41,760 |
|
|
|
184,975 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
127,333 |
|
|
|
114,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,282,025 |
|
|
|
100,075,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.01 per share in 2005 and 2004,
authorized 5,000,000 shares in 2005 and 2004; issued
and
outstanding 2,146,060.5 in 2005 and 1,776,394.5 in 2004 |
|
$ |
21,461 |
|
|
$ |
17,764 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
12,532,415 |
|
|
|
12,446,229 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,485,031 |
|
|
|
1,120,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,038,907 |
|
|
|
13,584,698 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
(109,847 |
) |
|
|
(90,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,929,060 |
|
|
|
13,494,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
135,211,085 |
|
|
$ |
113,569,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
F-2
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Interest revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
1,354,841 |
|
|
$ |
945,038 |
|
|
$ |
2,588,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,874,016 |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
31,764 |
|
|
|
26,087 |
|
|
|
63,339 |
|
|
|
49,605 |
|
U. S. government agency securities |
|
|
58,570 |
|
|
|
73,810 |
|
|
|
119,363 |
|
|
|
152,091 |
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
22,009 |
|
|
|
30,548 |
|
|
|
45,969 |
|
|
|
63,877 |
|
Tax exempt securities |
|
|
28,825 |
|
|
|
28,486 |
|
|
|
57,668 |
|
|
|
53,623 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
109,608 |
|
|
|
13,964 |
|
|
|
180,989 |
|
|
|
20,836 |
|
Other |
|
|
11,072 |
|
|
|
12,547 |
|
|
|
24,827 |
|
|
|
27,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest revenue |
|
$ |
1,616,689 |
|
|
$ |
1,130,480 |
|
|
$ |
3,080,292 |
|
|
$ |
2,241,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
395,349 |
|
|
|
225,746 |
|
|
|
739,195 |
|
|
|
452,815 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
75,571 |
|
|
|
57,583 |
|
|
|
142,511 |
|
|
|
110,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
470,920 |
|
|
|
283,329 |
|
|
|
881,706 |
|
|
|
563,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
1,145,769 |
|
|
|
847,151 |
|
|
|
2,198,586 |
|
|
|
1,677,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision
for loan losses |
|
|
1,070,769 |
|
|
|
802,151 |
|
|
|
2,073,586 |
|
|
|
1,587,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
60,751 |
|
|
|
60,866 |
|
|
|
117,503 |
|
|
|
120,173 |
|
Other fees and commissions |
|
|
63,858 |
|
|
|
77,218 |
|
|
|
145,215 |
|
|
|
151,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest revenue |
|
|
124,609 |
|
|
|
138,084 |
|
|
|
262,718 |
|
|
|
271,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
421,373 |
|
|
|
340,184 |
|
|
|
830,010 |
|
|
|
658,673 |
|
Employee benefits |
|
|
74,985 |
|
|
|
59,902 |
|
|
|
147,656 |
|
|
|
118,195 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
53,400 |
|
|
|
49,369 |
|
|
|
108,981 |
|
|
|
100,666 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
26,950 |
|
|
|
32,116 |
|
|
|
53,243 |
|
|
|
60,466 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
31,637 |
|
|
|
32,305 |
|
|
|
63,083 |
|
|
|
64,085 |
|
Other operating |
|
|
209,598 |
|
|
|
190,093 |
|
|
|
405,549 |
|
|
|
346,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expenses |
|
|
817,943 |
|
|
|
703,969 |
|
|
|
1,608,522 |
|
|
|
1,349,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
377,435 |
|
|
|
236,266 |
|
|
|
727,782 |
|
|
|
510,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
134,750 |
|
|
|
85,911 |
|
|
|
258,298 |
|
|
|
179,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
242,685 |
|
|
$ |
150,355 |
|
|
$ |
469,484 |
|
|
$ |
330,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
comprehensive |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shares |
|
Par value |
|
capital |
|
earnings |
|
income (loss) |
|
income |
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
|
1,776,394.5 |
|
|
$ |
17,764 |
|
|
$ |
12,446,229 |
|
|
$ |
1,120,705 |
|
|
$ |
(90,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
469,484 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities
available for sale, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,461 |
) |
|
|
(19,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
450,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividend $0.049 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock split effected in the form of
a 20% stock dividend |
|
|
355,266.0 |
|
|
|
3,553 |
|
|
|
(3,553 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
14,400.0 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
89,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2005 |
|
|
2,146,060.5 |
|
|
$ |
21,461 |
|
|
$ |
12,532,415 |
|
|
$ |
1,485,031 |
|
|
$ |
(109,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received |
|
$ |
2,983,285 |
|
|
$ |
2,187,077 |
|
Fees and commissions received |
|
|
262,718 |
|
|
|
271,571 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
(810,830 |
) |
|
|
(559,641 |
) |
Cash paid to suppliers and employees |
|
|
(1,505,344 |
) |
|
|
(1,235,456 |
) |
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(424,799 |
) |
|
|
(271,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505,030 |
|
|
|
392,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(842,422 |
) |
Available for sale at maturity or call |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,253,113 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,000 |
|
Available for sale at maturity or call |
|
|
904,964 |
|
|
|
1,573,275 |
|
Loans made, net of principal collected |
|
|
(9,855,285 |
) |
|
|
(7,709,306 |
) |
Purchase of equity securities |
|
|
(47,800 |
) |
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
Investment in bank owned life insurance (BOLI) |
|
|
(3,250,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Redemption of certificates of deposit |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Purchase of premises and equipment and software |
|
|
(113,656 |
) |
|
|
(86,487 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,061,777 |
) |
|
|
(7,808,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits |
|
|
8,035,628 |
|
|
|
4,682,175 |
|
Other deposits |
|
|
8,991,199 |
|
|
|
5,774,961 |
|
Net change in borrowed funds |
|
|
4,239,783 |
|
|
|
(1,000,000 |
) |
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
|
59,235 |
|
|
|
73,200 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(105,158 |
) |
|
|
(106,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,220,687 |
|
|
|
9,423,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
9,663,940 |
|
|
|
2,007,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
9,320,643 |
|
|
|
6,479,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
18,984,583 |
|
|
$ |
8,487,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Reconciliation of net income to net cash
provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
469,484 |
|
|
$ |
330,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating actitivities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
73,942 |
|
|
|
75,115 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,964 |
|
Change in deferred loan fees net of costs |
|
|
(47,237 |
) |
|
|
(48,682 |
) |
Amortization of premiums and discounts |
|
|
2,861 |
|
|
|
5,251 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(23,286 |
) |
|
|
(15,414 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
70,876 |
|
|
|
4,090 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(99,819 |
) |
|
|
(85,031 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
(52,631 |
) |
|
|
(10,950 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(14,224 |
) |
|
|
45,050 |
|
Loss on Pointer Ridge, LLC |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
505,030 |
|
|
$ |
392,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. GENERAL
Organization
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland on April
11, 2003 to serve as the holding company of Old Line Bank. The primary business of Old Line
Bancshares, Inc. is owning all of the capital stock of Old Line Bank. Old Line Bancshares also has
an approximately $550,000 equity investment in a real estate investment limited liability company
named Pointer Ridge Office Investment, LLC (Pointer Ridge). Old Line Bancshares, Inc. owns 50%
of Pointer Ridge.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the activity of Old Line
Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Old Line Bank. All significant intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The foregoing consolidated financial statements are unaudited; however, in the opinion of
management, all adjustments (comprising only normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair
presentation of the results of the interim period have been included. The balances as of December
31, 2004 were derived from audited financial statements. These statements should be read in
conjunction with Old Line Bancshares financial statements and accompanying notes included in Old
Line Bancshares, Inc.s Form 10-KSB. There have been no significant changes to the Companys
accounting policies as disclosed in the Form 10-KSB. We have reclassified fees from advances on
construction loans to interest revenue. In 2005, management determined that this revenue relates
more to the use of funds than to commitments to make such funds available. The amounts that we
reclassified were $6,876 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and $31,616 for the six months
ended June 30, 2004. The results shown in this interim report are not necessarily indicative of
results expected for the full year 2005.
The accounting and reporting policies of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. conform to accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
2. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
As Old Line Bancshares, Inc. purchases securities, management determines if the securities
should be classified as held to maturity, available for sale or trading. Securities which
management has the intent and ability to hold to maturity are recorded at amortized cost which is
cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Securities
which management may sell before maturity are classified as available for sale and carried at fair
value with unrealized gains and losses included in stockholders equity on an after tax basis.
Management has not identified any investment securities as trading.
3. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes includes taxes payable for the current year and deferred income
taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for
the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
F-7
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
4. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per common share is determined by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding giving retroactive affect to the 20% stock dividend
paid to shareholders of record on March 7, 2005 and payable March 24, 2005. Diluted earnings per
share is calculated including the average dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the
period. Dilutive common equivalent shares consist of stock options, calculated using the treasury
stock method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Weighted average number of shares |
|
|
2,144,042.92 |
|
|
|
2,131,139.34 |
|
|
|
2,140,149.29 |
|
|
|
2,123,988.78 |
|
Dilutive average number of shares |
|
|
27,772.00 |
|
|
|
33,856.80 |
|
|
|
31,454.00 |
|
|
|
34,982.40 |
|
5. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. applies APB No. 25 in accounting for stock options. Accordingly,
Old Line Bancshares has not recognized compensation for stock options granted. Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123) was
issued in October, 1995 to establish accounting and reporting standards for stock-based employee
compensation plans. SFAS No. 123 requires measurement of compensation expense provided by
stock-based plans using a fair value based method of accounting, and recognition of compensation
expense in the statement of income or disclosure in the notes to the financial statements.
Had we determined compensation expense in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, our
net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the following pro forma amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
242,685 |
|
|
$ |
150,355 |
|
|
$ |
469,484 |
|
|
$ |
330,701 |
|
Stock -based employee compensation expense |
|
|
(3,283 |
) |
|
|
(7,233 |
) |
|
|
(6,566 |
) |
|
|
(14,466 |
) |
Income tax benefit of employee compensation expense |
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
2,790 |
|
|
|
2,536 |
|
|
|
5,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
240,670 |
|
|
$ |
145,912 |
|
|
$ |
465,454 |
|
|
$ |
321,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
F-8
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
5. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)
A summary of the status of the outstanding options follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
exercise price |
Outstanding, beginning of year |
|
|
114,420 |
|
|
$ |
6.62 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(14,400 |
) |
|
|
4.11 |
|
Options expired |
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
9.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, June 30, 2005 |
|
|
99,120 |
|
|
$ |
6.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-9
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
Waldorf, Maryland
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and
Subsidiary as of December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an
audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31,
2004, 2003, and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then
ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Rowles & Company, LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
January 21, 2005
F-10
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
4,090,776 |
|
|
$ |
2,477,119 |
|
|
$ |
1,409,172 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
5,229,867 |
|
|
|
4,002,828 |
|
|
|
5,622,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
9,320,643 |
|
|
|
6,479,947 |
|
|
|
7,032,155 |
|
Time deposits in other banks |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
15,612,411 |
|
|
|
17,381,519 |
|
|
|
13,387,553 |
|
Investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
2,204,290 |
|
|
|
1,803,812 |
|
|
|
5,351,588 |
|
Loans, less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
81,504,890 |
|
|
|
59,517,690 |
|
|
|
43,058,786 |
|
Restricted equity securities at cost |
|
|
1,079,950 |
|
|
|
818,450 |
|
|
|
373,750 |
|
Investment in real estate, LLC |
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank premises and equipment |
|
|
2,352,348 |
|
|
|
2,279,669 |
|
|
|
1,920,243 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
365,388 |
|
|
|
315,326 |
|
|
|
305,486 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
88,723 |
|
|
|
60,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
190,675 |
|
|
|
178,465 |
|
|
|
215,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
113,569,318 |
|
|
$ |
89,535,803 |
|
|
$ |
72,244,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
25,424,314 |
|
|
$ |
19,902,350 |
|
|
$ |
12,614,536 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
63,540,800 |
|
|
|
49,422,727 |
|
|
|
49,641,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
88,965,114 |
|
|
|
69,325,077 |
|
|
|
62,256,325 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
4,637,012 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
173,320 |
|
|
|
149,831 |
|
|
|
250,259 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
184,975 |
|
|
|
130,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,021 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
114,585 |
|
|
|
102,566 |
|
|
|
17,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,075,006 |
|
|
|
76,708,149 |
|
|
|
66,558,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.01 per
share in 2004 and 2003, $10 per share
in 2002; authorized 5,000,000 shares
in 2004 and 2003 and 1,000,000
in 2002; issued and oustanding
1,776,394.5 in 2004, 1,756,894.5
in 2003, and 286,631.5 in 2002 |
|
|
17,764 |
|
|
|
17,569 |
|
|
|
2,866,315 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
12,446,229 |
|
|
|
12,362,902 |
|
|
|
2,600,000 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,120,705 |
|
|
|
517,097 |
|
|
|
127,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,584,698 |
|
|
|
12,897,568 |
|
|
|
5,593,406 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
(90,386 |
) |
|
|
(69,914 |
) |
|
|
93,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,494,312 |
|
|
|
12,827,654 |
|
|
|
5,686,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
113,569,318 |
|
|
$ |
89,535,803 |
|
|
$ |
72,244,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-11
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Interest revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
4,150,675 |
|
|
$ |
3,346,013 |
|
|
$ |
2,856,341 |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
113,541 |
|
|
|
4,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
|
294,108 |
|
|
|
392,966 |
|
|
|
609,988 |
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
118,088 |
|
|
|
101,186 |
|
|
|
160,498 |
|
Tax exempt securities |
|
|
111,236 |
|
|
|
88,397 |
|
|
|
22,204 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
50,936 |
|
|
|
82,300 |
|
|
|
109,880 |
|
Other |
|
|
51,271 |
|
|
|
42,310 |
|
|
|
29,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest revenue |
|
|
4,889,855 |
|
|
|
4,058,012 |
|
|
|
3,788,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
933,557 |
|
|
|
1,063,399 |
|
|
|
1,302,098 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
229,696 |
|
|
|
195,392 |
|
|
|
194,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
1,163,253 |
|
|
|
1,258,791 |
|
|
|
1,496,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
3,726,602 |
|
|
|
2,799,221 |
|
|
|
2,291,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
162,000 |
|
|
|
144,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,506,602 |
|
|
|
2,637,221 |
|
|
|
2,147,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
244,831 |
|
|
|
239,679 |
|
|
|
217,749 |
|
Other fees and commissions |
|
|
309,370 |
|
|
|
209,041 |
|
|
|
183,751 |
|
Gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,359 |
|
|
|
38,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest revenue |
|
|
554,201 |
|
|
|
537,079 |
|
|
|
439,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
1,417,434 |
|
|
|
1,233,855 |
|
|
|
1,021,878 |
|
Employee benefits |
|
|
245,162 |
|
|
|
195,579 |
|
|
|
157,676 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
202,627 |
|
|
|
199,567 |
|
|
|
202,478 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
118,280 |
|
|
|
118,947 |
|
|
|
99,386 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
126,552 |
|
|
|
113,260 |
|
|
|
98,904 |
|
Other operating |
|
|
695,904 |
|
|
|
618,214 |
|
|
|
503,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
2,805,959 |
|
|
|
2,479,422 |
|
|
|
2,084,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,254,844 |
|
|
|
694,878 |
|
|
|
502,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
438,203 |
|
|
|
224,616 |
|
|
|
164,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
816,641 |
|
|
$ |
470,262 |
|
|
$ |
337,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-12
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
comprehensive |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Shares |
|
Par value |
|
capital |
|
earnings |
|
income |
|
income |
|
Balance, December 31, 2001 |
|
|
573,263.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,866,315 |
|
|
$ |
2,563,223 |
|
|
$ |
(105,210 |
) |
|
$ |
37,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
One for two share exchange |
|
|
(286,631.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
337,869 |
|
Transfer to surplus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,777 |
|
|
|
(36,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
securities available for
sale, net of income taxes of $27,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,011 |
|
|
|
56,011 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
393,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividend $0.067 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2002 |
|
|
286,631.5 |
|
|
|
2,866,315 |
|
|
|
2,600,000 |
|
|
|
127,091 |
|
|
|
93,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Offering |
|
|
299,000.0 |
|
|
|
2,990,000 |
|
|
|
3,924,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
470,262 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
securities available for
sale, net of income taxes of $87,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163,101 |
) |
|
|
(163,101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
307,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of $10 par value
shares for $.01 par value
shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,850,459 |
) |
|
|
5,850,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock split effected in the form of
a 200% stock dividend |
|
|
1,171,263.0 |
|
|
|
11,713 |
|
|
|
(11,713 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividend $0.075 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,257 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
|
|
1,756,894.5 |
|
|
$ |
17,569 |
|
|
|
12,362,902 |
|
|
|
517,096 |
|
|
|
(69,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
816,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
816,641 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
securities available for
sale, net of income taxes of $11,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,472 |
) |
|
|
(20,472 |
) |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
796,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividend $0.10 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(213,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
83,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
|
1,776,394.5 |
|
|
$ |
17,764 |
|
|
$ |
12,446,229 |
|
|
$ |
1,120,705 |
|
|
$ |
(90,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-13
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received |
|
$ |
4,722,940 |
|
|
$ |
4,041,277 |
|
|
$ |
3,794,112 |
|
Fees and commissions received |
|
|
554,201 |
|
|
|
448,720 |
|
|
|
402,971 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
(1,139,764 |
) |
|
|
(1,359,219 |
) |
|
|
(1,488,018 |
) |
Cash paid to suppliers and employees |
|
|
(2,668,340 |
) |
|
|
(2,172,857 |
) |
|
|
(2,038,914 |
) |
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(400,677 |
) |
|
|
(101,064 |
) |
|
|
(170,602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,068,360 |
|
|
|
856,857 |
|
|
|
499,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
(842,422 |
) |
|
|
(2,504,375 |
) |
|
|
(4,351,767 |
) |
Available for sale |
|
|
(1,253,113 |
) |
|
|
(15,888,784 |
) |
|
|
(14,508,839 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity at maturity or call |
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
2,700,000 |
|
Held to maturity sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,040,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale at maturity or call |
|
|
2,983,820 |
|
|
|
11,464,166 |
|
|
|
12,247,933 |
|
Available for sale sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,249,275 |
|
|
|
1,036,875 |
|
Loans made, net of principal collected |
|
|
(22,081,500 |
) |
|
|
(16,583,046 |
) |
|
|
(9,385,288 |
) |
Purchase of equity securities |
|
|
(261,500 |
) |
|
|
(444,700 |
) |
|
|
(6,950 |
) |
Investment in real estate, LLC |
|
|
(550,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Purchase) redemption of certificates of deposit |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
(600,000 |
) |
Purchase of premises and equipment and software |
|
|
(221,166 |
) |
|
|
(544,253 |
) |
|
|
(302,498 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,364,881 |
) |
|
|
(18,311,717 |
) |
|
|
(13,160,034 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits |
|
|
11,162,317 |
|
|
|
(910,139 |
) |
|
|
2,365,583 |
|
Other deposits |
|
|
8,477,720 |
|
|
|
7,978,892 |
|
|
|
9,053,865 |
|
Net change in borrowed funds |
|
|
3,637,012 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
|
73,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,914,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(213,032 |
) |
|
|
(80,257 |
) |
|
|
(68,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,137,217 |
|
|
|
16,902,652 |
|
|
|
11,350,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,840,696 |
|
|
|
(552,208 |
) |
|
|
(1,309,828 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
6,479,947 |
|
|
|
7,032,155 |
|
|
|
8,341,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
9,320,643 |
|
|
$ |
6,479,947 |
|
|
$ |
7,032,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-14
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Reconciliation of net income to net cash
provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
816,641 |
|
|
$ |
470,262 |
|
|
$ |
337,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
149,709 |
|
|
|
152,312 |
|
|
|
118,334 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
162,000 |
|
|
|
144,000 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,359 |
) |
|
|
(36,875 |
) |
(Gain) loss on sale of equipment |
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,471 |
) |
Change in deferred loan fees net of costs |
|
|
(125,700 |
) |
|
|
(37,858 |
) |
|
|
(84,382 |
) |
Amortization of premium and discounts |
|
|
8,847 |
|
|
|
30,963 |
|
|
|
14,724 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(16,774 |
) |
|
|
(7,123 |
) |
|
|
19,098 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest
payable and other liabilities |
|
|
89,808 |
|
|
|
115,310 |
|
|
|
(2,964 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest
receivable and other assets |
|
|
(75,135 |
) |
|
|
59,350 |
|
|
|
(8,784 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,068,360 |
|
|
$ |
856,857 |
|
|
$ |
499,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
F-15
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
1. |
|
Organization |
|
|
|
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. (Bancshares) was incorporated under the laws of the State of
Maryland on April 11, 2003 to serve as the holding company of Old Line Bank (Bank). On
May 22, 2003, the stockholders of Old Line Bank approved an Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization and Articles of Share Exchange pursuant to which (i) Old Line Bank would
become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Old Line Bancshares, Inc., and (ii) each outstanding
share (or fraction thereof) of Old Line Bank common stock would be converted into one share
(or fraction thereof) of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. common stock, and the former holders of
Old Line Bank common stock would become the holders of all the outstanding shares of Old
Line Bancshares, Inc. common stock. The reorganization became effective at 12:01 a.m. on
September 15, 2003. |
|
|
|
The reorganization was accounted for in a manner similar to that for a pooling of
interests. Under this accounting treatment, the net assets and liabilities of Old Line
Bank were recorded as the asset of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. (investment in subsidiary) at
book value, and the stockholders equity account of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. equals the
stockholders equity account of Old Line Bank. As part of this reorganization, $500,000
was transferred from Old Line Bank to fund the expenses associated with the holding company
formation and other anticipated holding company expenses. |
|
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
|
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation-The accompanying consolidated financial statements
include the activity of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Old Line
Bank. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation. |
|
|
|
Business-Old Line Bank is a full service commercial bank operating in the suburban Maryland
(Washington, D.C. suburbs) counties of Prince Georges and Charles. The Bank offers
deposit services and loans to individuals, small businesses, associations and government
entities. Other services include direct deposit of payroll and social security checks,
automatic drafts from accounts, automated teller machine services, cash management
services, safe deposit boxes, money orders and travelers cheques. The Bank also offers
credit card services. |
|
|
|
Use of estimates-The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. These estimates and assumptions
may affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from these estimates. Material estimates that are particularly
susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the
allowance for loan losses and deferred tax assets. |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents-For purposes of the consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, cash
and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, and federal funds sold.
Generally, federal funds are purchased and sold for one-day periods. |
|
|
|
Investment securities-As securities are purchased, management determines if the securities
should be classified as held to maturity, available for sale or trading. Securities
which management has the intent and ability to hold to maturity are recorded at
amortized cost which is cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of
discounts to maturity. Securities which may be sold before maturity are classified as
available for sale and carried at fair value with
unrealized gains and losses included in stockholders equity on an after tax basis.
Management has not identified any investment securities as trading. |
F-16
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2003, Old Line Bank sold $1 million in investments that were
previously classified as held-to-maturity. As required under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, all securities held at that time and previously
classified as held to maturity were reclassified as available-for-sale. |
|
|
|
Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and are
determined using the specific identification method. |
|
|
|
Stock options-The Company accounts for stock options under Accounting Principles Board
Opinion (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Options Issued to Employees in accounting for
the stock options. Accordingly, no compensation has been recognized for the stock options
granted. SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation was issued in October, 1995
to establish accounting and reporting standards for stock-based employee compensation
plans. SFAS No. 123 requires measurement of compensation expense provided by stock-based
plans using a fair value based method of accounting, and recognition of compensation
expense in the statement of income or disclosure in the notes to the financial statements. |
|
|
|
Had compensation been determined in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the
Banks net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the following pro forma
amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
816,641 |
|
|
$ |
470,262 |
|
|
$ |
337,869 |
|
Stock-based employee compensation expense |
|
|
(59,200 |
) |
|
|
(35,770 |
) |
|
|
(8,556 |
) |
Income tax benefit of employee compensation expense |
|
|
22,863 |
|
|
|
13,814 |
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
780,304 |
|
|
$ |
448,306 |
|
|
$ |
332,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
Bank premises and equipment-Bank premises and equipment are recorded at cost less
accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method.
Investment in real estate LLC-On July 22, 2004, Bancshares executed an Operating Agreement
as a member to establish Pointer Ridge Office Investment, LLC (Pointer Ridge). The
purpose of Pointer Ridge is to acquire, own, hold for profit, sell, assign, transfer,
operate, lease, develop, mortgage, refinance, pledge and otherwise deal with real property
located at the intersection of Pointer Ridge Road and Route 301 in Bowie, Md. Pointer
Ridge has acquired the property and intends to construct a commercial office building.
Bancshares plans to lease approximately 50% of this building for its main office and a
branch of Old Line Bank. Bancshares ownership percentage is 50% and four other members
hold the remaining 50% ownership. Bancshares records this investment on the equity method.
Foreclosed real estate-Real estate acquired through foreclosure is recorded at the lower of
cost or fair market value on the date acquired. Losses incurred at the time of acquisition
of the property
are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent reductions in the estimated value
of the property are included in non-interest expense.
F-17
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
|
|
Advertising-Advertising costs are expensed over the life of ad campaigns. General purpose
advertising is charged to expense as incurred. |
|
|
|
Loans and allowance for loan losses-Loans are stated at face value plus deferred
origination costs, less deferred origination fees and the allowance for loan losses. |
|
|
|
Interest on loans is accrued based on the principal amounts outstanding. Origination fees
and costs are amortized to income over the terms of the loans using an approximate interest
method.
The accrual of interest is discontinued when any portion of the principal or interest is
ninety days past due and collateral is insufficient to discharge the debt in full. |
|
|
|
Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information, management considers it
unlikely that the collection of principal and interest payments will be made according to
contractual terms. |
|
|
|
Generally, loans are not reviewed for impairment until the accrual of interest has been
discontinued. If collection of principal is evaluated as doubtful, all payments are
applied to principal. |
|
|
|
The allowance for loan losses represents an amount which, in managements judgment,
will be adequate to absorb probable losses on existing loans and other extensions of credit
that may become uncollectible. Managements judgment in determining the adequacy of the
allowance is based on evaluations of the collectibility of loans. These evaluations take
into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio,
current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers ability to pay, overall
portfolio quality, and review of specific problem areas. If the current economy or real
estate market were to suffer a severe downturn, the estimate for uncollectible accounts
would need to be increased. Loans which are deemed to be uncollectible are charged off and
deducted from the allowance. The provision for loan losses and recoveries on loans
previously charged off are added to the allowance. |
|
|
|
Income taxes-The provision for income taxes includes taxes payable for the current year and
deferred income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the
difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using
enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
Tax expense and tax benefits are allocated to the Bank and Bancshares based on their
proportional share of taxable income. |
|
|
|
Earnings per share-Basic earnings per common share are determined by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding giving retroactive affect
to the stock dividends. |
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share are calculated including the average dilutive common stock
equivalents outstanding during the period. Dilutive common equivalent shares consist of
stock options, calculated using the treasury stock method. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Weighted average number of shares |
|
|
2,127,837.4 |
|
|
|
1,636,426.8 |
|
|
|
1,031,873.4 |
|
Dilutive average number of shares |
|
|
36,078.0 |
|
|
|
37,933.2 |
|
|
|
17,010.0 |
|
F-18
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
|
|
Comprehensive income-Comprehensive income includes net income and the unrealized gain
(loss) on investment securities available for sale net of related income taxes. |
|
|
|
Reclassifications-Management has re-classified revenue from advances on construction loans
to interest revenue. In 2005, management determined that this revenue relates more to the
use of funds than to the commitment to make such funds available. The amounts reclassified
were $71,598, $63,662, and $31,707 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002.
Per share information has been restated to give effect to the 20% stock dividend paid in
March 2005. |
|
3. |
|
Cash and Equivalents |
|
|
|
The Bank may carry balances with other banks that exceed the federally insured limit. The
average balance in 2004, 2003 and 2002 did not exceed the federally insured limit. The
Bank also sells federal funds on an unsecured basis to the same banks. The average balance
sold was $4,055,755, $7,990,556, and $6,809,790 in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. |
|
|
|
Banks are required to carry non-interest-bearing cash reserves at specified percentages of
deposit balances. The Banks normal amount of cash on hand and on deposit with other banks
is sufficient to satisfy the reserve requirements. |
F-19
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
4. |
|
Investment Securities |
|
|
|
Investment securities are summarized as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
December 31, 2004 |
|
cost |
|
gains |
|
losses |
|
value |
|
Available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. Treasury |
|
$ |
1,997,721 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(17,408 |
) |
|
$ |
1,980,313 |
|
U. S. government agency |
|
|
7,885,261 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
(107,612 |
) |
|
|
7,777,840 |
|
State, county, and municipal |
|
|
3,314,167 |
|
|
|
30,341 |
|
|
|
(22,006 |
) |
|
|
3,322,502 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
2,556,491 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
(25,484 |
) |
|
|
2,531,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,753,640 |
|
|
$ |
31,281 |
|
|
$ |
(172,510 |
) |
|
$ |
15,612,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. Treasury |
|
$ |
2,002,773 |
|
|
$ |
7,567 |
|
|
$ |
(12,449 |
) |
|
$ |
1,997,891 |
|
State, county, and municipal |
|
|
201,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,702 |
) |
|
|
196,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,204,290 |
|
|
$ |
7,567 |
|
|
$ |
(17,151 |
) |
|
$ |
2,194,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. Treasury |
|
$ |
1,497,209 |
|
|
$ |
5,837 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,503,046 |
|
U. S. government agency |
|
|
9,379,090 |
|
|
|
12,606 |
|
|
|
59,491 |
|
|
|
9,332,205 |
|
State, county, and municipal |
|
|
3,067,857 |
|
|
|
49,763 |
|
|
|
19,182 |
|
|
|
3,098,438 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
3,547,095 |
|
|
|
3,105 |
|
|
|
102,370 |
|
|
|
3,447,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,491,251 |
|
|
$ |
71,311 |
|
|
$ |
181,043 |
|
|
$ |
17,381,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. Treasury |
|
$ |
1,803,812 |
|
|
$ |
7,569 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,811,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. government agency |
|
$ |
8,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
74,843 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,074,843 |
|
State, county, and municipal |
|
|
1,485,996 |
|
|
|
15,527 |
|
|
|
29,935 |
|
|
|
1,471,588 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
3,760,365 |
|
|
|
82,899 |
|
|
|
2,142 |
|
|
|
3,841,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,246,361 |
|
|
$ |
173,269 |
|
|
$ |
32,077 |
|
|
$ |
13,387,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. government agency |
|
$ |
5,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
104,192 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,104,192 |
|
State, county, and municipal |
|
|
351,588 |
|
|
|
9,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,351,588 |
|
|
$ |
113,860 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,465,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
4. |
|
Investment Securities (Continued) |
|
|
|
The table below summarizes investment securities with unrealized losses as of December 31,
2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
December 31, 2004 |
|
Value |
|
Losses |
|
|
|
Losses less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
3,471,328 |
|
|
$ |
29,857 |
|
U.S. government agency |
|
|
6,790,038 |
|
|
|
95,223 |
|
State, county, and municipal |
|
|
942,771 |
|
|
|
14,175 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
1,695,115 |
|
|
|
24,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total less than 12 months |
|
$ |
12,899,252 |
|
|
$ |
163,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses greater than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. government agency |
|
|
487,611 |
|
|
|
12,389 |
|
State, county, and municipal |
|
|
388,068 |
|
|
|
12,533 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
418,528 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total greater than 12 months |
|
$ |
1,294,207 |
|
|
$ |
26,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
3,471,328 |
|
|
$ |
29,857 |
|
U.S. government agency |
|
|
7,277,649 |
|
|
|
107,612 |
|
State, county, and municipal |
|
|
1,330,839 |
|
|
|
26,708 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
2,113,643 |
|
|
|
25,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses |
|
$ |
14,193,459 |
|
|
$ |
189,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All unrealized losses on securities as of December 31, 2004 are considered to be temporary
losses because each security will be redeemed at face value at or prior to maturity. In
most cases, a temporary impairment in value is caused by market interest rate fluctuations.
The Bank has the intent and the ability to hold these securities until recovery or
maturity.
F-21
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
4. |
|
Investment Securities (Continued) |
|
|
|
There were no sales of securities in 2004. During 2003 and 2002 proceeds from sales of
investment securities were $2,289,275, and $1,036,875 resulting in gross gains of $88,359,
and $36,875, respectively. The unrealized gain on investment securities included in
comprehensive income is reported net of these realized gains. |
Contractual maturities and pledged securities at December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002,
are shown below. Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities because
borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or
prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale |
|
Held to Maturity |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
December 31, 2004 |
|
cost |
|
value |
|
cost |
|
value |
|
Maturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year |
|
$ |
575,557 |
|
|
$ |
575,035 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Over one to five years |
|
|
11,789,877 |
|
|
|
11,668,087 |
|
|
|
2,002,773 |
|
|
|
1,997,892 |
|
Over five years |
|
|
3,388,206 |
|
|
|
3,369,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over ten years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,517 |
|
|
|
196,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,753,640 |
|
|
$ |
15,612,411 |
|
|
$ |
2,204,290 |
|
|
$ |
2,194,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities |
|
$ |
12,824,536 |
|
|
$ |
12,686,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year |
|
$ |
1,091,411 |
|
|
$ |
997,674 |
|
|
$ |
299,475 |
|
|
$ |
299,662 |
|
Over one to five years |
|
|
9,723,800 |
|
|
|
9,735,006 |
|
|
|
1,504,337 |
|
|
|
1,511,719 |
|
Over five years |
|
|
6,676,040 |
|
|
|
6,648,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,491,251 |
|
|
$ |
17,381,519 |
|
|
$ |
1,803,812 |
|
|
$ |
1,811,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities |
|
$ |
7,498,999 |
|
|
$ |
7,450,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year |
|
$ |
1,496,969 |
|
|
$ |
1,515,646 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Over one to five years |
|
|
8,145,105 |
|
|
|
8,269,934 |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
2,529,575 |
|
Over five years |
|
|
3,604,287 |
|
|
|
3,601,973 |
|
|
|
2,851,588 |
|
|
|
2,935,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,246,361 |
|
|
$ |
13,387,553 |
|
|
$ |
5,351,588 |
|
|
$ |
5,465,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities |
|
$ |
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,042,987 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,578,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities are pledged to secure a line of credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank.
F-22
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
5. |
|
Credit Commitments |
|
|
|
The Bank is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course
of business in order to meet the financing needs of customers. These financial instruments
include commitments to extend credit, available credit lines and standby letters of credit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Commitments to extend credit and available credit lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
2,895,972 |
|
|
$ |
1,394,609 |
|
|
$ |
2,385,000 |
|
Real estate-undisbursed development and construction |
|
|
7,418,916 |
|
|
|
3,931,474 |
|
|
|
3,581,606 |
|
Real estate-undisbursed home equity lines of credit |
|
|
3,426,235 |
|
|
|
2,686,224 |
|
|
|
3,891,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,741,123 |
|
|
$ |
8,012,307 |
|
|
$ |
9,857,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
1,307,459 |
|
|
$ |
316,705 |
|
|
$ |
275,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan commitments and lines of credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there
is no violation of any condition to the contract. Loan commitments generally have variable
interest rates, fixed expiration dates, and may require payment of a fee. Lines of credit
generally have variable interest rates. Such lines do not represent future cash
requirements because it is unlikely that all customers will draw upon their lines in full
at any time. Letters of credit are commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a
customer to a third party.
The Banks exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the customer is the
contractual amount of the commitment. Loan commitments, lines of credit, and letters of
credit are made on the same terms, including collateral, as outstanding loans. Management
is not aware of any accounting loss it would incur by funding its outstanding commitments.
F-23
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
6. |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
Major classifications of loans are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
34,299,921 |
|
|
$ |
26,858,597 |
|
|
$ |
16,697,757 |
|
Construction |
|
|
6,550,550 |
|
|
|
1,761,724 |
|
|
|
878,617 |
|
Residential |
|
|
8,530,410 |
|
|
|
3,641,498 |
|
|
|
2,884,431 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
11,190,012 |
|
|
|
8,250,958 |
|
|
|
6,156,267 |
|
Installment |
|
|
21,355,734 |
|
|
|
19,355,178 |
|
|
|
16,665,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,926,627 |
|
|
|
59,867,955 |
|
|
|
43,282,830 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(744,862 |
) |
|
|
(547,690 |
) |
|
|
(389,553 |
) |
Net deferred loan fees and (costs) |
|
|
323,125 |
|
|
|
197,425 |
|
|
|
165,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,504,890 |
|
|
$ |
59,517,690 |
|
|
$ |
43,058,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The maturity and rate repricing distribution of the loan portfolio follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Maturing within one year |
|
$ |
34,943,883 |
|
|
$ |
22,589,080 |
|
|
$ |
10,347,276 |
|
Maturing over one to five years |
|
|
22,861,858 |
|
|
|
14,373,242 |
|
|
|
13,287,123 |
|
Maturing over five years |
|
|
24,120,886 |
|
|
|
22,905,633 |
|
|
|
19,648,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,926,627 |
|
|
$ |
59,867,955 |
|
|
$ |
43,282,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No loans were 90 days or more past due or considered impaired at December 31, 2004, 2003 or
December 31, 2002.
Transactions in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
547,690 |
|
|
$ |
389,553 |
|
|
$ |
268,806 |
|
Provisions charged to operations |
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
162,000 |
|
|
|
144,000 |
|
Recoveries |
|
|
16,179 |
|
|
|
12,691 |
|
|
|
12,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
783,869 |
|
|
|
564,244 |
|
|
|
425,301 |
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
39,007 |
|
|
|
16,554 |
|
|
|
35,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
744,862 |
|
|
$ |
547,690 |
|
|
$ |
389,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank makes loans to customers located in the Maryland suburbs of Washington D.C.
Although the loan portfolio is diversified, the regional economy will influence its
performance.
F-24
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
7. |
|
Restricted Equity Securities |
|
|
|
Restricted equity securities were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Federal Reserve Bank stock |
|
$ |
356,450 |
|
|
$ |
356,450 |
|
|
$ |
161,750 |
|
Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
511,500 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Maryland Financial Bank stock |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,079,950 |
|
|
$ |
818,450 |
|
|
$ |
373,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. |
|
Bank Premises and Equipment |
|
|
|
A summary of bank premises and equipment and the related depreciation follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Useful lives |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Land |
|
|
|
$ |
487,673 |
|
|
$ |
487,673 |
|
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
Building |
|
50 years |
|
|
1,264,831 |
|
|
|
1,201,361 |
|
|
|
1,135,350 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
5-30 years |
|
|
523,019 |
|
|
|
469,144 |
|
|
|
255,754 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
5-7 years |
|
|
767,515 |
|
|
|
738,372 |
|
|
|
629,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,043,038 |
|
|
|
2,896,550 |
|
|
|
2,411,057 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
690,690 |
|
|
|
616,881 |
|
|
|
490,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net bank premises and equipment |
|
|
|
$ |
2,352,348 |
|
|
$ |
2,279,669 |
|
|
$ |
1,920,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
|
$ |
123,673 |
|
|
$ |
126,067 |
|
|
$ |
98,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer software included in other assets, and related amortization, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
5 years |
|
$ |
201,436 |
|
|
$ |
198,586 |
|
|
$ |
139,826 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
|
|
148,103 |
|
|
|
122,066 |
|
|
|
95,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net computer software |
|
|
|
$ |
53,333 |
|
|
$ |
76,520 |
|
|
$ |
44,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
|
$ |
26,036 |
|
|
$ |
26,245 |
|
|
$ |
19,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. |
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
Major classifications of interest bearing deposits are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Money market and NOW |
|
$ |
16,475,269 |
|
|
$ |
13,834,126 |
|
|
$ |
15,052,542 |
|
Savings |
|
|
10,652,997 |
|
|
|
10,338,384 |
|
|
|
8,428,891 |
|
Other time $100,000 and over |
|
|
17,269,348 |
|
|
|
7,669,333 |
|
|
|
7,324,067 |
|
Other time |
|
|
19,143,186 |
|
|
|
17,580,884 |
|
|
|
18,836,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
63,540,800 |
|
|
$ |
49,422,727 |
|
|
$ |
49,641,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
9. |
|
Deposits (Continued) |
|
|
|
Time deposits mature as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Within one year |
|
$ |
10,636,468 |
|
|
$ |
13,291,356 |
|
|
$ |
9,946,325 |
|
Over one to two years |
|
|
9,445,817 |
|
|
|
6,097,076 |
|
|
|
10,375,593 |
|
Over two to three years |
|
|
5,430,631 |
|
|
|
3,160,300 |
|
|
|
4,683,713 |
|
Over three to four years |
|
|
10,899,618 |
|
|
|
1,008,669 |
|
|
|
247,247 |
|
Over four to five years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,692,816 |
|
|
|
907,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
36,412,534 |
|
|
$ |
25,250,217 |
|
|
$ |
26,160,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Money market and NOW |
|
$ |
81,213 |
|
|
$ |
74,869 |
|
|
$ |
77,414 |
|
Savings |
|
|
51,648 |
|
|
|
59,969 |
|
|
|
80,250 |
|
Time deposits $100,000 and over |
|
|
358,154 |
|
|
|
290,451 |
|
|
|
295,294 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
442,543 |
|
|
|
638,110 |
|
|
|
849,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
933,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,063,399 |
|
|
$ |
1,302,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
|
Short-Term Borrowings |
|
|
|
The Bank has available lines of credit including overnight federal funds and reverse
repurchase agreements from its correspondent bank totaling $9,500,000 as of December 31,
2004. The Bank has an additional secured line of credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Atlanta (FHLB) of $22,713,000 of which the Bank had borrowed $7,000,000 as of December 31,
2004 as outlined below. |
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings consist of promissory notes sold to the Banks customers and federal
funds purchased. The short-term promissory notes are sold to the Banks customers, reprice
daily and have maturities of 270 days or less. Federal funds purchased are unsecured,
overnight borrowings from other financial institutions. |
F-26
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
10. |
|
Short-Term Borrowings (Continued) |
|
|
|
Information relating to short-term borrowings is a follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
Amount |
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
Rate |
|
Amount outstanding at year-end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term promissory notes |
|
$ |
3,637,012 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB federal funds purchased |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
% |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,637,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average for the Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term promissory notes |
|
|
115,320 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB federal funds purchased |
|
|
85,117 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
|
53,425 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
8,219 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
200,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
53,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. |
|
Long-Term Borrowings |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, the Bank had two long-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
(FHLB) totaling $6,000,000. |
|
|
|
The 1.79% FHLB borrowings in the amount of $2,000,000 are due March 17, 2009. Interest is
payable March 17, June 17, September 17 and December 17, of each year. Effective March 16,
2006 and any payment date thereafter, the FHLB has the option to convert the interest rate
into a three (3) month LIBOR based floating rate. |
|
|
|
The 4.80% FHLB borrowings in the amount of $4,000,000 are due on January 3, 2011. Interest
is payable January 3, April 3, July 3, and October 3 of each year. Effective January 3,
2002 and any payment date thereafter, the FHLB has the option to convert the interest rate
into a three (3) month LIBOR based floating rate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
Amount |
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
Rate |
|
Amount outstanding at year-end |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advance due 2009 |
|
$ |
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1.79 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advance due 2011 |
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average for the Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advance due 2009 |
|
|
1,836,066 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advance due 2011 |
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,836,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
12. |
|
Related Party Transactions |
|
|
|
The Bank has entered into various transactions with firms in which owners are also members
of the Board of Directors. Fees charged for these services are at similar rates charged by
unrelated parties for similar work. Amounts paid to these related parties totaled $6,886,
$10,159, and $18,175 during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002,
respectively. Bancshares has a $550,000 investment in Pointer Ridge. Frank Lucente, a
director of Bancshares and the Bank, controls twenty five percent of Pointer Ridge. |
|
|
|
Loans made to officers and directors or their affiliated companies totaled $2,888,793,
$1,959,356, and $1,484,469, at December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. The
directors and officers and their affiliated companies maintained deposits with the Bank of
$7,992,743, $6,149,089, and $9,348,805 at December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
In the opinion of management, these transactions were made on substantially the same terms,
including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable
transactions with unrelated parties. |
|
|
|
The schedule below summarizes changes in amounts of loans outstanding to executive officers
and directors or their affiliated companies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
1,959,356 |
|
|
$ |
1,484,469 |
|
Additions |
|
|
2,661,910 |
|
|
|
3,486,164 |
|
Repayments |
|
|
(1,732,473 |
) |
|
|
(3,011,277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
2,888,793 |
|
|
$ |
1,959,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. |
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
|
The components of income tax are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
386,878 |
|
|
$ |
203,708 |
|
|
$ |
145,786 |
|
State |
|
|
68,099 |
|
|
|
28,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
454,977 |
|
|
|
231,739 |
|
|
|
145,786 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
(16,774 |
) |
|
|
(7,123 |
) |
|
|
19,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
438,203 |
|
|
$ |
224,616 |
|
|
$ |
164,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
13. |
|
Income Taxes (Continued) |
|
|
|
The components of the deferred income taxes are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
$ |
(75,849 |
) |
|
$ |
(75,018 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,054 |
) |
Organizational costs |
|
|
5,897 |
|
|
|
(28,013 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan origination fees and cost, net |
|
|
38,251 |
|
|
|
34,951 |
|
|
|
31,311 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
14,927 |
|
|
|
60,957 |
|
|
|
(753 |
) |
Operating loss carryover |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(16,774 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,123 |
) |
|
$ |
19,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the net deferred tax assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
253,337 |
|
|
$ |
177,488 |
|
|
$ |
102,470 |
|
Organization costs |
|
|
22,116 |
|
|
|
28,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale |
|
|
50,842 |
|
|
|
39,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforward |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326,295 |
|
|
|
245,319 |
|
|
|
102,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan origination costs |
|
|
137,022 |
|
|
|
98,771 |
|
|
|
63,820 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
100,550 |
|
|
|
85,623 |
|
|
|
24,666 |
|
Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237,572 |
|
|
|
184,394 |
|
|
|
136,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability) |
|
$ |
88,723 |
|
|
$ |
60,925 |
|
|
$ |
(34,021 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The differences between the federal income tax rate of 34 percent and the effective tax
rate for the Bank are reconciled as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Statutory federal income tax rate |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
Increase (decrease) resulting from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of
federal income tax benefit |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax exempt income |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Nondeductible expenses |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
|
32.3 |
% |
|
|
32.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
14. |
|
Retirement Plan |
|
|
|
The Bank maintains a 401(k) profit sharing plan for employees who meet the eligibility
requirements set forth in the plan. Pursuant to the plan, which was amended in March 2003
and effective January 1, 2003, the Bank matches the first 3% of employee contributions to
the plan and 50% of the next 2% of employee contributions, for a maximum required
contribution of 4% of employee eligible compensation. This plan, which covers
substantially all employees, allows for elective employee deferrals. The Banks
contributions to the plan for 2004, 2003, and 2002, were $42,623, $37,716, and $14,255,
respectively. |
|
15. |
|
Capital Standards
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has adopted risk-based capital standards for
banking organizations. These standards require ratios of capital to assets for minimum
capital adequacy and to be classified as well capitalized under prompt corrective action
provisions. As of December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, the capital ratios and minimum
capital requirements are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum capital |
|
To be well |
(in thousands) |
|
Actual |
|
adequacy |
|
capitalized |
December 31, 2004 |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
14,330 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
$ |
7,050 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
8,813 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Old Line Bank |
|
$ |
13,662 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
$ |
7,050 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
8,813 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
13,585 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
$ |
3,525 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
5,288 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Old Line Bank. |
|
$ |
12,917 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
$ |
3,525 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
5,288 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
13,585 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
$ |
4,272 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
5,340 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Old Line Bank |
|
$ |
12,917 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
$ |
4,257 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,407 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
13,445 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
$ |
5,326 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,657 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Old Line Bank |
|
$ |
13,002 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
$ |
5,312 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,639 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
12,898 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
$ |
2,663 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,994 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Old Line Bank. |
|
$ |
12,455 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
$ |
2,656 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,984 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
12,898 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
$ |
3,514 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,392 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Old Line Bank |
|
$ |
12,455 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
$ |
3,506 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,383 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Line Bank |
|
$ |
5,983 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
$ |
4,091 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
5,114 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Line Bank |
|
$ |
5,593 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
$ |
2,052 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,079 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Line Bank |
|
$ |
5,593 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
$ |
2,832 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,540 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
F-30
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
15. |
|
Capital Standards (Continued) |
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital consists of common stock, surplus, and undivided profits. Total capital
includes a limited amount of the allowance for loan losses. In calculating risk-weighted
assets, specified risk percentages are applied to each category of asset and off-balance
sheet items. |
|
|
|
Failure to meet the capital requirement could affect the Banks ability to pay dividends
and accept deposits and may significantly affect the operations of the Bank. |
|
|
|
In the most recent regulatory report, the Bank was categorized as well capitalized under
the prompt corrective action regulations. Management knows of no events or conditions that
should change this classification. |
|
16. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
The Bank leases three branch locations under operating lease agreements expiring through
2015. Each of the leases provides extension options. The approximate future minimum lease
commitments under the operating leases as of December 31, 2004, are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount |
2005 |
|
$ |
78,551 |
|
2006 |
|
|
145,736 |
|
2007 |
|
|
157,406 |
|
2008 |
|
|
162,371 |
|
2009 |
|
|
142,471 |
|
Remaining |
|
|
577,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,263,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense was $74,463, $81,056, and $83,651 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003,
and 2002, respectively.
In the normal course of business the Bank is involved in various legal proceedings. In the
opinion of management, any liability resulting from such proceedings would not have a
material adverse effect on the Banks financial statements.
F-31
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
17. |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The estimated fair values of financial instruments equal the carrying value of the
instruments except as noted.
Time
Deposits-The fair value of time deposits with other banks is an estimate by discounting
future cash flows using current rates offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Investment Securities-The fair values of investment securities available for sale and held
to maturity are based upon quoted market prices or dealer quotes.
Loans-The fair value of loans is an estimate determined by discounting future cash flows
using current rates for which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit
histories.
Deposits-The fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts is the amount payable on
demand. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is an estimate using the
rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Borrowed funds-The fair value of long-term FHLB advances is estimated by discounting the
value of contractual cash flows using rates currently offered for advances with similar
terms and remaining maturities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
December 31, 2002 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
|
amount |
|
value |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits |
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
301,469 |
|
|
$ |
700,000 |
|
|
$ |
713,092 |
|
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
624,920 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
17,816,701 |
|
|
|
17,807,117 |
|
|
|
19,185,331 |
|
|
|
19,192,900 |
|
|
|
18,739,141 |
|
|
|
18,853,001 |
|
Loans |
|
|
81,504,890 |
|
|
|
81,800,291 |
|
|
|
59,517,690 |
|
|
|
60,257,105 |
|
|
|
43,058,786 |
|
|
|
44,440,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
63,540,800 |
|
|
$ |
63,618,816 |
|
|
$ |
49,422,727 |
|
|
$ |
50,097,561 |
|
|
$ |
49,641,789 |
|
|
$ |
50,727,499 |
|
Long term borrowings |
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
6,024,540 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,150,607 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,172,581 |
|
F-32
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
18. |
|
Other Operating Expenses |
Other operating expenses that are over 1% of gross revenues are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Director fees |
|
$ |
93,359 |
|
|
$ |
53,499 |
|
|
$ |
38,200 |
|
Branch security costs |
|
|
34,042 |
|
|
|
58,726 |
|
|
|
28,078 |
|
Audit & exam fees |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
74,884 |
|
|
|
40,200 |
|
Organizational & legal expenses |
|
|
41,673 |
|
|
|
86,726 |
|
|
|
25,162 |
|
Other |
|
|
466,830 |
|
|
|
344,379 |
|
|
|
372,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
695,904 |
|
|
$ |
618,214 |
|
|
$ |
503,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19. |
|
Parent Company Financial Information |
|
|
|
The balance sheet, statement of income, and statement of cash flows for Old Line Bancshares,
Inc. (Parent Company) follow: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
47,715 |
|
|
$ |
113,908 |
|
Investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,475 |
|
Investment in Pointer Ridge, LLC |
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Old Line Bank |
|
|
12,826,689 |
|
|
|
12,384,821 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
22,116 |
|
|
|
28,013 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
47,912 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,494,432 |
|
|
$ |
12,827,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; authorized
5,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 1,776,394.5
in 2004, and 1,756,894.5 in 2003. |
|
$ |
17,764 |
|
|
$ |
17,569 |
|
Paid-in-capital |
|
|
12,446,229 |
|
|
|
12,362,902 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,120,705 |
|
|
|
517,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,584,698 |
|
|
|
12,897,568 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
(90,386 |
) |
|
|
(69,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,494,312 |
|
|
|
12,827,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,494,432 |
|
|
$ |
12,827,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
19. |
|
Parent Company Financial Information (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Line Bancshares, Inc |
|
|
|
|
Statement of Income |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Interest and dividend revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution from bank |
|
$ |
413,032 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
4,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and dividend revenue |
|
|
418,544 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organizational expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,726 |
|
Other operating |
|
|
94,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
94,499 |
|
|
|
86,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
324,045 |
|
|
|
(86,617 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(30,256 |
) |
|
|
(29,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354,301 |
|
|
|
(57,167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net income of bank |
|
|
462,340 |
|
|
|
527,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
816,641 |
|
|
$ |
470,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
19. |
|
Parent Company Financial Information (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows |
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividends received |
|
$ |
417,892 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Cash paid for operating expenses |
|
|
(94,379 |
) |
|
|
(86,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,513 |
|
|
|
(86,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
(139,874 |
) |
|
|
(499,366 |
) |
Proceeds from maturity of investment securities
held to maturity |
|
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Purchase (redemption) of certificates of deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate, LLC |
|
|
(550,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(249,874 |
) |
|
|
(299,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
|
73,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(213,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash from Bank at reorganization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139,832 |
) |
|
|
113,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
(66,193 |
) |
|
|
113,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
113,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
47,715 |
|
|
$ |
113,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
816,641 |
|
|
$ |
470,262 |
|
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net income of subsidiary |
|
|
(462,340 |
) |
|
|
(527,429 |
) |
Accretion of discount on debt securities |
|
|
(652 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,897 |
|
|
|
(28,013 |
) |
Increase in other liabilities |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(36,153 |
) |
|
|
(1,437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
323,513 |
|
|
$ |
(86,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
20. |
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
|
A summary of the status of the outstanding options follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Number |
|
average |
|
Number |
|
average |
|
Number |
|
average |
|
|
of shares |
|
exercise price |
|
of shares |
|
exercise price |
|
of shares |
|
exercise price |
|
Outstanding, beginning of year |
|
|
107,100 |
|
|
$ |
4.93 |
|
|
|
88,200 |
|
|
$ |
3.81 |
|
|
|
74,700 |
|
|
$ |
3.76 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
30,720 |
|
|
|
9.83 |
|
|
|
18,900 |
|
|
|
9.58 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
|
4.94 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(23,400 |
) |
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year |
|
|
114,420 |
|
|
$ |
6.62 |
|
|
|
107,100 |
|
|
$ |
4.93 |
|
|
|
88,200 |
|
|
$ |
3.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options |
|
Options exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Number |
|
average |
|
average |
|
Number |
|
average |
Exercise |
|
outstanding at |
|
remaining |
|
exercise |
|
outstanding at |
|
exercise |
price |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
term |
|
price |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
price |
$3.33-$4.17 |
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
5.36 years |
|
|
$ |
3.43 |
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
$ |
3.43 |
|
$4.18-$5.00 |
|
|
42,300 |
|
|
|
5.47 years |
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
|
|
42,300 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
$9.58-$10.00 |
|
|
49,620 |
|
|
|
9.50 years |
|
|
|
9.73 |
|
|
|
43,020 |
|
|
|
9.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,420 |
|
|
|
7.36 years |
|
|
$ |
6.62 |
|
|
|
107,820 |
|
|
$ |
6.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2004, 2003, and 2002, has been
estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Dividend yield |
|
|
1.02 |
% |
|
|
0.81 |
% |
|
|
1.37 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.22 |
% |
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
25.10 |
% |
|
|
25.10 |
% |
|
|
21.37 |
% |
Expected life in years |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Preferred stock
Bancshares is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value
of one cent per share.
F-36
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiary
Notes to Financial Statements
(Continued)
21. |
|
Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the unaudited quarterly results of operations |
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except per share data) |
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
1,366 |
|
|
$ |
1,283 |
|
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
|
$ |
1,111 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Net income |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
Earnings per share-basic |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
Earnings per share-diluted |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
|
$ |
1,045 |
|
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
$ |
973 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Net income |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
Earnings per share-basic |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
Earnings per share-diluted |
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
951 |
|
|
$ |
984 |
|
|
$ |
959 |
|
|
$ |
894 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Net income |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Earnings per share-basic |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
Earnings per share-diluted |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
F-37
No one has been authorized to give any
information or to make any representations in
connection with the public offering, other than
those contained in this prospectus. You may not
assume that we have authorized any other
information or representations. The delivery of
this prospectus and the sale of our common stock
does not mean that there has been no change in
our affairs since the date of this prospectus.
This prospectus is not an offer to sell or a
solicitation of an offer to buy securities in any
state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
Prospectus Summary
|
|
|
1 |
|
Summary Financial Data
|
|
|
7 |
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
8 |
|
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
|
|
|
13 |
|
Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
14 |
|
Market For Common Stock
|
|
|
15 |
|
Dividend Policy
|
|
|
15 |
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
16 |
|
Dilution
|
|
|
17 |
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
18 |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
|
19 |
|
Business of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and Old Line Bank
|
|
|
49 |
|
Management
|
|
|
56 |
|
Stock Ownership of Management and Principal Holders
|
|
|
69 |
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
|
|
|
71 |
|
Supervision and Regulation
|
|
|
72 |
|
Description of Capital Stock
|
|
|
79 |
|
Plan of Distribution
|
|
|
83 |
|
Legal Matters
|
|
|
84 |
|
Experts
|
|
|
84 |
|
Where You Can Find More Information
|
|
|
84 |
|
Index to Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
Shares
PROSPECTUS
, 2005
McKinnon &
Company, Inc.
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 24. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
The Registrants charter provides that the personal liability of its directors and officers
for monetary damages is eliminated except:
|
|
To the extent that it is proved that the person actually received an improper benefit or
profit in money, property, or services for the amount of the benefit or profit in money,
property, or services actually received; |
|
|
|
To the extent that a judgment or other final adjudication adverse to the person is
entered in a proceeding based on a finding in the proceeding that the persons action, or
failure to act, was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty and was material to the
cause of action adjudicated in the proceeding; and |
|
|
|
To the extent an administrative proceeding or action is instituted by an appropriate
bank regulatory agency which proceeding or actions results in a final order requiring
affirmative action by an individual or individuals in the form of payment to the
Registrant. |
The Registrants charter also provides that it will indemnify its officers and directors
against liabilities and, in certain circumstances, will advance expenses to such persons prior to a
final disposition of an action. Also, the rights of indemnification provided in the Registrants
charter are not exclusive of any other rights which may be available under any insurance or other
agreement, by resolution of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.
These provisions are designed to reduce, in appropriate cases, the risks incident to serving
as a director, officer, employee or agent and to enable us to attract and retain the best personnel
available.
Item 25. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
The estimated expenses payable by the Registrant in connection with the offering described in this
Registration Statement (other than underwriting commissions) will be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable to |
|
Type of Fee |
|
Total Cost |
Securities and Exchange
Commission |
|
Filing Fees |
|
$ |
2,200 |
|
NASDAQ SmallCap Market |
|
Listing Fees |
|
$ |
15,500 |
* |
American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company |
|
Transfer Agent Fees |
|
$ |
5,000 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Printing R.R. Donnelley Financial |
|
Printing, Postage, and EDGAR |
|
$ |
31,800 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, a
Professional Corporation |
|
Legal Fees and Expenses |
|
$ |
110,000 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rowles & Company, LLP |
|
Accounting Fees and Expenses |
|
$ |
20,000 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expenses* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(including Blue Sky fees) |
|
$ |
32,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
216,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-1
Item 26. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.
On May 22, 2003, the stockholders of Old Line Bank approved the reorganization of Old Line
Bank into a holding company structure. In connection with the reorganization, (i) Old Line Bank
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant and (ii) each outstanding share (or fraction
thereof) of Old Line Bank common stock was converted into one share (or fraction thereof) of the
Registrants common stock, and the former holders of Old Line Bank common stock became the holders
of all of the Registrants outstanding shares.
The Registrant acquired all of the outstanding securities of Old Line Bank upon receiving
regulatory approval and the satisfaction of the other conditions of the reorganization, which
became effective on September 15, 2003. The shares of common stock issued by the Registrant in the
reorganization of Old Line Bank were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration found
in Section 3(a)(12) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Item 27. Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
1.1#
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement |
|
|
|
|
3.1*
|
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. |
|
|
|
3.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. |
|
|
|
4.1*
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Opinion of Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, a Professional Corporation |
|
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement of James W. Cornelsen |
|
|
|
10.2(F)
|
|
First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement of James W. Cornelsen |
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement of Joseph E. Burnett |
|
|
|
10.4(F)
|
|
First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement of Joseph W. Burnett |
|
|
|
10.5*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Christine M. Rush |
|
|
|
10.6(F)
|
|
First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement of Christine M. Rush |
|
|
|
10.7(A)
|
|
2001 Stock Option Plan, as amended |
|
|
|
10.8(A)
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for 2001 Stock Option Plan |
|
|
|
10.9(A)
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for 2001 Stock Option Plan |
|
|
|
10.10(B)
|
|
1990 Stock Option Plan, as amended |
|
|
|
10.11(B)
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Grant Letter for 1990 Stock Option Plan |
|
|
|
10.12(B)
|
|
Form of Director Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for 1990 Stock Option Plan. |
|
|
|
10.13(D)
|
|
2004 Equity Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
10.14(F)
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for 2004 Equity Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
10.15(F)
|
|
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and Old Line Bank Director Compensation Policy |
|
|
|
10.16(C)
|
|
Lease Agreement dated April 29, 1999 between Live Oak Limited Partnership and Old
Line National Bank |
|
|
|
10.17(C)
|
|
Commercial Lease Agreement dated February 14, 2002 between Adams and Company
Commercial Brokers, Inc. and Old Line National Bank |
|
|
|
10.18(E)
|
|
Commercial Lease Agreement dated July 7, 2004 by and between Ridgely I, LLC and
Old Line Bank |
|
|
|
10.19(E)
|
|
Operating Agreement for Pointer Ridge Office Investment, LLC among J. Webb Group, Inc.,
Michael M. Webb, Lucente Enterprises, Inc., Chesapeake Custom Homes, L.L.C. and Old
Line Bancshares, Inc., all as Members and Chesapeake Pointer Ridge Manager, LLC. |
|
|
|
10.20(G)
|
|
AIA Construction Agreement dated April 14, 2005 between Pointer Ridge Office Investment,
LLC and Waverly Construction & Management Company Inc. |
|
|
|
10.21(G)
|
|
Incentive Plan Model and Stock Option Model |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Deed of Lease dated as of July 28, 2005 between Baltimore Boulevard Associates Limited
Partnership and Old Line Bank |
|
|
|
|
21#
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, a Professional Corporation (contained in their
opinion included herein as Exhibit 5) |
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Consent of Rowles & Company, LLP |
|
|
|
|
24#
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on signature page) |
|
II-2
#
Previously filed.
* Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as part of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB, as amended, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(File
Number 000-50345).
(A) Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as a part of, and incorporated by reference from,
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-8, under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (Registration Number 333-111587).
(B) Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as a part of, and incorporated by reference from,
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-8, under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (Registration Number 333-113097).
(C) Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as a part of, and incorporated by reference from,
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A filed on April 8, 2004.
(D) Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as a part of, and incorporated by reference from,
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-8, under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (Registration Number 333-116845).
(E) Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as a part of, and incorporated by reference from,
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed on November 8, 2004.
(F) Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as a part of, and incorporated by reference from,
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2005.
(G) Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as part of, and incorporated by reference from,
Old line Bancshares, Inc.s Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB filed on August 10, 2005.
Note: Exhibits 10.1 through 10.15, and 10.21 relate to management contracts or compensatory plans
or arrangements.
Item 28. Undertakings.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted
to directors, officers and controlling persons of the small business issuer pursuant to the
foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the small business issuer has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable.
In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment
by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or a controlling person of
the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the
small business issuer will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether
such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this Registration
Statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the
Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, shall be deemed to be part of this Registration Statement as of the time it was
declared effective.
II-3
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to
be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering
of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering
thereof.
II-4
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies
that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements of filing on Form
SB-2 and authorized this pre-effective amendment No. 1 to the registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned in
Waldorf, Maryland on October 7, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OLD LINE BANCSHARES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ James W. Cornelsen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Cornelsen |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement
was signed by the following persons in the capacities and dates stated.
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Title |
|
Date |
/s/ James W. Cornelsen
|
|
Director, President and
|
|
October 7, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
James W. Cornelsen
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Christine M. Rush
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief
|
|
October 7, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Christine M. Rush
|
|
Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal |
|
|
|
|
Accounting and Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Charles A. Bongar, Jr. |
|
Director
|
|
October 7, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Charles A. Bongar, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Craig E. Clark
|
|
Director and Chairman of the Board
|
|
October 7, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Craig E. Clark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel W. Deming |
|
Director
|
|
October 7, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel W. Deming |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James F. Dent |
|
Director
|
|
October 7, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Dent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Nancy L. Gasparovic |
|
Director
|
|
October 7, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nancy L. Gasparovic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Frank Lucente, Jr. |
|
Director
|
|
October 7, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Lucente, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
II-5
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Title |
|
Date |
/s/ Gail D. Manuel |
|
Director
|
|
October 7, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gail D. Manuel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John D. Mitchell, Jr. |
|
Director
|
|
October 7, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
John D. Mitchell, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gregory S. Proctor |
|
Director
|
|
October 7, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory S. Proctor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Pursuant to the Power of Attorney filed as Exhibit 24 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 for Old Line Bancshares, Inc. on August 23, 2005. |
II-6
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
1.1#
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement |
|
|
|
3.1*
|
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. |
|
|
|
3.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. |
|
|
|
4.1*
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate of Old Line Bancshares, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Opinion of Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, a Professional Corporation |
|
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement of James W. Cornelsen |
|
|
|
10.2(F)
|
|
First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement of James W. Cornelsen |
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Executive Employment Agreement of Joseph E. Burnett |
|
|
|
10.4(F)
|
|
First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement of Joseph W. Burnett |
|
|
|
10.5*
|
|
Employment Agreement of Christine M. Rush |
|
|
|
10.6(F)
|
|
First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement of Christine M. Rush |
|
|
|
10.7(A)
|
|
2001 Stock Option Plan, as amended |
|
|
|
10.8(A)
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for 2001 Stock Option Plan |
|
|
|
10.9(A)
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for 2001 Stock Option Plan |
|
|
|
10.10(B)
|
|
1990 Stock Option Plan, as amended |
|
|
|
10.11(B)
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Grant Letter for 1990 Stock Option Plan |
|
|
|
10.12(B)
|
|
Form of Director Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for 1990 Stock Option Plan. |
|
|
|
10.13(D)
|
|
2004 Equity Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
10.14(F)
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for 2004 Equity Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
10.15(F)
|
|
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. and Old Line Bank Director Compensation Policy |
|
|
|
10.16(C)
|
|
Lease Agreement dated April 29, 1999 between Live Oak Limited Partnership and Old
Line National Bank |
|
|
|
10.17(C)
|
|
Commercial Lease Agreement dated February 14, 2002 between Adams and Company
Commercial Brokers, Inc. and Old Line National Bank |
|
|
|
10.18(E)
|
|
Commercial Lease Agreement dated July 7, 2004 by and between Ridgely I, LLC and
Old Line Bank |
|
|
|
10.19(E)
|
|
Operating Agreement for Pointer Ridge Office Investment, LLC among J. Webb Group, Inc.,
Michael M. Webb, Lucente Enterprises, Inc., Chesapeake Custom Homes, L.L.C. and Old
Line Bancshares, Inc., all as Members and Chesapeake Pointer Ridge Manager, LLC. |
|
|
|
10.20(G)
|
|
AIA Construction Agreement dated April 14, 2005 between Pointer Ridge Office Investment,
LLC and Waverly Construction & Management Company Inc. |
|
|
|
10.21(G)
|
|
Incentive Plan Model and Stock Option Model |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Deed of Lease dated as of July 28, 2005 between Baltimore Boulevard Associates Limited
Partnership and Old Line Bank |
|
|
|
21#
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, a Professional Corporation (contained in their
opinion included herein as Exhibit 5) |
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
Consent of Rowles & Company, LLP |
|
|
|
24#
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on signature page) |
#
Previously filed.
* Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as part of Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Registration
Statement on Form 10-SB, as amended, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(File
Number 000-50345).
(A) Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as a part of, and incorporated by reference from,
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-8, under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (Registration Number 333-111587).
(B) Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as a part of, and incorporated by reference from,
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-8, under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (Registration Number 333-113097).
(C) Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as a part of, and incorporated by reference from,
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A filed on April 8, 2004.
(D) Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as a part of, and incorporated by reference from,
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-8, under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (Registration Number 333-116845).
(E) Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as a part of, and incorporated by reference from,
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed on November 8, 2004.
(F) Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as a part of, and incorporated by reference from,
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2005.
(G) Previously filed by Old Line Bancshares, Inc. as part of, and incorporated by reference from,
Old line Bancshares, Inc.s Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB filed on August 10, 2005.
Note: Exhibits 10.1 through 10.15, and 10.21 relate to management contracts or compensatory plans
or arrangements.