e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 0-26524
LOUD TECHNOLOGIES INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Washington
|
|
91-1432133 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
16220 Wood-Red Road, N.E., Woodinville, Washington
|
|
98072 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(425) 487-4333
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name or former address, if
changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.): Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Common Stock, no par value |
|
4,858,941 |
Class
|
|
Number of Shares Outstanding |
|
|
(as of August 12, 2008) |
LOUD TECHNOLOGIES INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended June 30, 2008
INDEX
2
LOUD TECHNOLOGIES INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except for share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
4,670 |
|
|
$ |
3,589 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $4,246 and $3,537, respectively |
|
|
28,639 |
|
|
|
25,204 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
46,631 |
|
|
|
56,804 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
3,741 |
|
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
83,681 |
|
|
|
87,512 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
4,895 |
|
|
|
5,744 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
19,709 |
|
|
|
19,726 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
26,942 |
|
|
|
27,975 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
2,669 |
|
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
137,896 |
|
|
$ |
143,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity (Deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
3,748 |
|
|
$ |
1,318 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
20,216 |
|
|
|
25,830 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
10,278 |
|
|
|
11,020 |
|
Current deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
1,773 |
|
|
|
1,834 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
39,433 |
|
|
|
48,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion |
|
|
91,078 |
|
|
|
92,358 |
|
Convertible debt, net of discount |
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
4,377 |
|
|
|
4,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
136,378 |
|
|
|
145,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity (deficit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value. Authorized 5,000,000 shares,
no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value. Authorized 40,000,000 shares,
issued and outstanding 4,858,941 and 4,618,942
shares at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
41,951 |
|
|
|
41,810 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
6,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(47,224 |
) |
|
|
(43,662 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity (deficit) |
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
(1,717 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity (deficit) |
|
$ |
137,896 |
|
|
$ |
143,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
LOUD TECHNOLOGIES INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended |
|
|
Six Months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
54,981 |
|
|
$ |
50,583 |
|
|
$ |
109,130 |
|
|
$ |
101,536 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
37,870 |
|
|
|
36,049 |
|
|
|
76,203 |
|
|
|
73,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
17,111 |
|
|
|
14,534 |
|
|
|
32,927 |
|
|
|
28,139 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
11,533 |
|
|
|
11,032 |
|
|
|
23,523 |
|
|
|
22,533 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,583 |
|
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
5,615 |
|
|
|
5,631 |
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
14,378 |
|
|
|
14,398 |
|
|
|
29,434 |
|
|
|
29,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
2,733 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
3,493 |
|
|
|
(1,579 |
) |
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,336 |
) |
|
|
(2,758 |
) |
|
|
(6,240 |
) |
|
|
(4,608 |
) |
Management fee |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
(485 |
) |
Other |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(2,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(3,627 |
) |
|
|
(2,910 |
) |
|
|
(6,826 |
) |
|
|
(7,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(894 |
) |
|
|
(2,774 |
) |
|
|
(3,333 |
) |
|
|
(8,705 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,050 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,735 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,562 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.73 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
|
4,859 |
|
|
|
4,855 |
|
|
|
4,859 |
|
|
|
4,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,050 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,735 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,562 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,700 |
) |
Foreign currency translation loss (gain) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(1,046 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,735 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,599 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
LOUD TECHNOLOGIES INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,562 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,700 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,619 |
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
Amortization and write-offs of deferred financing costs |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
Gain on asset dispositions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(526 |
) |
Stock based compensation |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(3,443 |
) |
|
|
1,962 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
10,171 |
|
|
|
11,798 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(1,829 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and
payable to former Italian subsidiary |
|
|
(6,349 |
) |
|
|
(7,804 |
) |
Taxes payable |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(523 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used)/provided by operating activities |
|
|
(1,266 |
) |
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(758 |
) |
|
|
(1,323 |
) |
Acquisition of St. Louis Music, Inc., including transaction fees paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,181 |
) |
Acquisition of Martin Audio, Ltd., net of cash acquired of $3,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,964 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(758 |
) |
|
|
(35,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(6,500 |
) |
|
|
(42,069 |
) |
Issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,000 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds (payments) on line of credit and short term borrowings |
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
|
(14,210 |
) |
Net payment on debt and credit facility acquired in acquition of Martin Audio, Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,030 |
) |
Financing costs associated with debt issuance |
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
(2,946 |
) |
Net proceeds from stock sales and exercise of stock options |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
3,101 |
|
|
|
39,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
6,377 |
|
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
3,589 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
4,670 |
|
|
$ |
6,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
4,886 |
|
|
$ |
3,422 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
441 |
|
|
$ |
536 |
|
Accrued acquition related expenses |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,397 |
|
Cash paid for acquisition related expenses |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
659 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
LOUD TECHNOLOGIES INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity (Deficit)
Six months ended June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
4,619 |
|
|
|
41,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,662 |
) |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
(1,717 |
) |
Stock based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
Exercise of warrants |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Convertible debt beneficial
conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,693 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,562 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
4,859 |
|
|
|
41,951 |
|
|
|
6,693 |
|
|
|
(47,224 |
) |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
LOUD TECHNOLOGIES INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2008
(Unaudited)
1. Description of Business
LOUD Technologies Inc. (LOUD or the Company) was founded in 1988. The Company was incorporated
in Washington under the name Mackie Designs Inc., and subsequently changed its name to LOUD
Technologies Inc. LOUD is one of the worlds largest dedicated professional audio and music
products companies. As the corporate parent for world-recognized brands Alvarez®, Ampeg®, Crate®,
EAW®, Knilling®, Mackie®, Martin Audio®, SIA® and TAPCO®, LOUD engineers, manufactures, markets and
distributes a wide range of professional audio and musical instrument products worldwide.
Additionally, LOUD is a distributor of branded professional audio and music accessories through its
SLM Marketplace catalog.
Our product lines include sound reinforcement speakers, analog mixers, guitar and bass amplifiers,
professional loudspeaker systems, and branded musical instruments. These products can be found in
professional and project recording studios, video and broadcast suites, post-production facilities,
sound reinforcement applications including churches and nightclubs, retail locations, and on major
musical concert tours. The Company distributes its products primarily through retail dealers, mail
order outlets and installed sound contractors. The Company has its primary operations in the
United States with smaller operations in the United Kingdom, Canada, China and Japan.
On April 11, 2007, the company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Martin Audio, Ltd.
(Martin Audio), a UK-based manufacturer of loudspeakers and related equipment. The purchase
price was $33.6 million, plus fees of $2.1 million, for a total consideration amount of $35.7
million. Management believes that the acquisition of Martin Audio adds another well-known brand to
the Companys growing portfolio of brands and provides the Company with additional geographic and
channel diversification.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by LOUD
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements
and include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. They do not include all of the
information and disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. In managements
opinion, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair
presentation of the results of the interim periods are reflected herein. Operating results for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of future financial results.
The financial statements herein have been prepared assuming the Company continues as a going
concern, and do not include any adjustments that might be required were the Company to be unable to
continue as a going concern. While we were in compliance with applicable loan covenants as of June
30, 2008, we have not offered assurances that we will remain in compliance in future periods.
Were we to fall out of compliance and fail to negotiate waivers or obtain additional sources of
liquidity, our lenders could foreclose on our assets or take other steps that may impede our
ability to continue as a going concern.
The Company is highly leveraged and maintains a number of credit arrangements that are critical to
our growth and to our ongoing operations. These credit agreements include certain financial
covenants and ratios and require that we maintain adequate levels of eligible collateral to support
our borrowing level, among other restrictions. In previous quarters, we have been in breach of
certain financial covenants in our senior credit facility, and we have received forbearances from
the lender and entered into waiver agreements with respect to the defaults and amended our credit
agreement.
Under the terms of the senior secured credit facility, we are required to maintain certain
financial ratios, such as a fixed charge coverage ratio and a consolidated leverage ratio. We are
also required to meet certain EBITDA targets and adhere to certain
capital expenditure limits. The agreement also provides, among other matters, restrictions on
additional financing, dividends, mergers, and acquisitions. As of June 30, 2008, we met all of our
covenant requirements. The Company is uncertain whether it will meet these covenants in third and
fourth quarter 2008 and can offer no assurances that it will remain in compliance with the terms of
the credit agreement.
7
If breaches of the covenants of our senior secured credit facility occur, there is no
assurance that the lender would grant waivers or agree to restructure our debt or that we would be
able to obtain other financing. If we default on our debt, the lender has a variety of remedies
against us including accelerating all amounts so that they come due immediately and foreclosing on
their security interests, which would allow the creditor to take
possession of all of our assets. The accompanying financial
statements do not reflect any adjustments that might be required
should the Company default on debt agreements. |
Stock Based Compensation
The Company recorded stock based compensation expense for the relevant period as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock based compensation |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected life for each award granted is calculated using the simplified method as described in
SAB No. 107. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of LOUD common stock. The
risk free interest rate is based on the constant maturity U.S. Treasury rate with a remaining term
equal to the expected life. Compensation expense recorded includes estimates of the ultimate
number of options that are expected to vest. No options were granted during the three and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the allocation of purchase
costs to the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the carrying amount
of property and equipment and intangibles; valuation allowances for receivables, inventories, and
deferred income tax assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from sales of products, net of sales discounts, returns and allowances, are recognized
upon shipment under an agreement with a customer when risk of loss has passed to the customer, all
significant contractual obligations have been satisfied, the fee is fixed or determinable and
collection of the resulting receivable is considered probable. Products are generally shipped FOB
shipping point with no right of return. We do have some dealers who finance their purchases
through finance companies. We have manufacturers repurchase agreements with the finance companies
and defer the revenue and related cost of goods sold of these sales at the time of the sale. We
then recognize the revenue and related cost of goods sold of these sales when the right of return
no longer exists. Sales with contingencies, such as rights of return, rotation rights, conditional
acceptance provisions and price protection, are deferred until the contingencies have been
satisfied or the contingent period has lapsed. We generally warrant our products against defects
in materials and workmanship for periods of between one and six years, with the exception of
Alvarez Yairi guitars, which have a limited lifetime warranty. The estimated cost of warranty
obligations, sales returns and other allowances are recognized at the time of revenue recognition
based on
contract terms and prior claims experience.
8
Foreign Currency
The financial statements of our non-U.S. subsidiary, Martin Audio, have been translated into U.S.
Dollars. The functional currency of this subsidiary is the British Pound. All assets and
liabilities in the balance sheet of this subsidiary are translated at period-end exchange rates.
Net sales, costs and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange prevailing during the
period. Translation gains and losses are accumulated in a separate component of shareholders
equity.
The functional currency of the Companys other international subsidiaries is the U.S. Dollar.
Assets and liabilities recorded in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. Dollars at the
exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Net sales, costs and expense and cash flows are
translated at average rates of exchange prevailing during the period. Foreign currency transaction
gains and losses are included in other income (expense).
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
basis and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets
and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance due to the uncertainty surrounding
the ultimate realization of such assets. Management evaluates, on a periodic basis, the
recoverability of the net deferred tax assets and the amount of the valuation allowance. At such
time as it is determined that it is more likely than not the deferred tax assets are realizable,
the valuation allowance will be reduced.
The Company has recorded a deferred tax liability related to goodwill associated with the St. Louis
Music acquisition, which is being amortized for tax purposes, but not for book purposes. As
goodwill has an indeterminable life, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the amount, if any, of
deferred tax liabilities related to goodwill which will reverse during the net operating loss carry
forward period. Accordingly, the Company increases the valuation allowance with a corresponding
deferred tax provision as the deferred tax liability related to goodwill increases due to continued
amortization of goodwill for tax purposes.
The Company has also recorded a deferred tax liability related to the identifiable intangible
assets and fair value adjustments to the assets purchased associated with the acquisition of Martin
Audio. The Company recognizes a tax benefit as these assets are amortized for book purposes.
The Company adopted the provision of Financial Standards Accounting Board Interpretation No. 48
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48) an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 on
January 1, 2007. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had $1.5 million and $1.5
million of unrecognized tax benefits, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits
that would affect the Companys effective tax rate if recognized is $1.5 million as of June 30,
2008 and $1.5 million as of December 31, 2007.
In accordance with FIN 48, the Company elected to recognize accrued interest and penalties related
to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. As of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, the Company had approximately $0.4 million of accrued interest and penalties
related to uncertain tax positions, respectively. To the extent interest and penalties are not
assessed with respect to uncertain tax positions, amounts accrued will be reduced and reflected as
a reduction of the overall income tax position. The Company does not anticipate that total
unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change within the next twelve months.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the total amounts of unrecognized tax
benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,513 |
|
Decreases related to prior year tax positions |
|
|
(50 |
) |
Increases related to current year tax positions |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30,2008 |
|
$ |
1,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
9
Concentration of Credit and Supply Risk
We sell products on a worldwide basis and a significant portion of our accounts receivable are due
from customers outside of the United States. Where we are exposed to material credit risk, we
generally require letters of credit, advance payments, or carry foreign credit insurance. No
individual country outside of the United States accounted for more than 10% of net sales from
continuing operations in any of the periods presented. Sales to United States customers are
generally on open credit terms. In the United States, we primarily sell our products through
certain resellers and experience individually significant annual sales volumes with major
resellers. For the three-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company had sales to one
customer of $5.9 million and $9.0 million, or 10.7% and 17.7%, respectively of consolidated net
sales. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company had sales to the same
customer of $15.4 million and $18.3 million, or 14.1% and 18.1%, respectively.
The majority of our products are being manufactured exclusively by contract manufacturers on our
behalf. For the three-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, net sales of products
manufactured by one manufacturer were $26.4 million and $16.5 million, or 47.9% and 32.6%,
respectively of net sales while net sales of products manufactured by another manufacturer were
$10.3 million and $6.6 million, or 18.7% and 13.1%, respectively of consolidated net sales. For
the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, net sales of products manufactured by one
manufacturer were $51.0 million and $34.1 million, or 46.7% or 33.6%, respectively of net sales,
while net sales of products manufactured by another manufacturer were $19.8 million and $12.7
million, or 18.2% and 12.5%, respectively of consolidated net sales.
At June 30, 2008, the Company had 527 employees of which approximately 30 were members of an
organized labor union.
Recently Adopted Accounting Principles
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair
value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair value by providing a fair value
hierarchy used to classify the source of the information.
Effective January 1, 2008 the Company adopted SFAS 157 for our financial assets and liabilities
that are re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period. In accordance with the
provisions of FSP No., FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, we elected to defer
implementation of SFAS 157 related to our non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that
are recognized and disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis
until January 1, 2009. We are currently reviewing this provision of SFAS 157 to determine the
impact on our non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed
at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
The adoption of SFAS 157 with respect to financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and
reported at fair value did not have a material impact on our financial results in the first half of
2008. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the
types of inputs used for the various valuation techniques. The levels of the hierarchy are
described below:
|
|
|
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly; these include quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or
liabilities in markets that are not active |
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entitys own assumptions |
The following table presents our financial assets that have been measured at fair value as of June
30, 2008 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs utilized to determine such
fair value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2008 |
|
|
Level I |
|
Level II |
|
Level III |
Short-term investment |
|
$ |
2,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities, which provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets
and liabilities at fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to reduce both the complexity in
accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related
assets and liabilities differently. The Company adopted Statement No. 159, effective January 1,
2008, and did not elect the fair value option to measure certain financial instruments as it has
not had a material impact on the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
10
New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, which establishes
principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non controlling interest in an
acquiree, including the recognition and measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination.
The requirements of SFAS 141R are effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2008. The
Company is still assessing the full impact of this standard on its future consolidated financial
statements.
3. Net Loss Per Share
Basic net loss per common share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed on the basis of
the weighted average number of common shares plus dilutive potential common shares outstanding.
Dilutive potential common shares are calculated under the treasury stock method. Securities that
could potentially dilute basic income per share consist of outstanding stock options.
As the Company had a net loss in each of the periods presented, basic and diluted net loss per
common share are the same. Stock options to purchase 341,621 and 461,000 shares in 2008 and 2007,
respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted per share amounts because they are anti
dilutive.
4. Restructuring Costs
During 2007, management approved and implemented a restructuring plan primarily consisting of the
consolidation of our LOUD UK operations and a shift of our domestic manufacturing to overseas
contract manufacturers. During the six-month period ended June, 30 2008 we incurred approximately
$296,000 of restructuring costs primarily representing employee severance and related costs for 10
terminated employees. We had $345,000 of these restructuring amounts remaining in accrued
liabilities at June 30, 2008. The restructuring liability is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
462 |
|
New charges |
|
|
296 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
5,690 |
|
|
$ |
7,580 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
40,840 |
|
|
|
49,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,631 |
|
|
$ |
56,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Other Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Customer and distributor relationships |
|
$ |
13,855 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
12,293 |
|
Trademark |
|
|
12,713 |
|
|
|
1,742 |
|
|
|
10,971 |
|
Developed technology |
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
|
2,491 |
|
|
|
3,658 |
|
Non-compete agreement |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
32,767 |
|
|
$ |
5,825 |
|
|
$ |
26,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
32,785 |
|
|
$ |
4,810 |
|
|
$ |
27,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The company acquired Martin Audio on April 11, 2007. Certain identifiable intangible assets were
recorded as a result of this acquisition. Amortization for the three month period ended June 30,
2008 was approximately $507,000.
7. Goodwill
Changes in goodwill are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
19,726 |
|
Effects of foreign currency translation |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
19,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Financing
On March 6, 2008 we entered into an Amendment related to the Ableco credit facility. The Amendment
modified certain definitions used in the Financing Agreement and required us to reduce the balance
outstanding under the Financing Agreement by $7.5 million. The Amendment modified the definition
of Consolidated EBITDA and Consolidated Funded Indebtedness to change the calculations pursuant
to these terms, as well as other terms used in the Financing Agreement.
Our credit arrangements generally accrue interest based on variable short-term interest rates.
Increases in the prime rate or LIBOR would increase our interest expense, which would adversely
affect our profitability and cash flows.
(a) Short-term borrowings
The Company has a line of credit where it can borrow up to $10.0 million, subject to certain
restrictions, including available borrowing capacity. At June 30, 2008, the line of credit had an
outstanding balance of approximately $3.7 million with the ability to borrow up to an additional
$6.3 million. Interest is due quarterly and is based on Chase Manhattan Banks prime rate plus
0.5% or LIBOR plus 3.0%.
(b) Long-term debt
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Companys long-term debt consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Convertible debt, net of discount |
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ableco Term Loan A |
|
|
17,869 |
|
|
|
19,203 |
|
Ableco US Term Loan B |
|
|
34,668 |
|
|
|
39,333 |
|
Ableco UK Term Loan B |
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
29,500 |
|
Ableco Term Loan C |
|
|
12,541 |
|
|
|
12,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,568 |
|
|
|
100,358 |
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of debt |
|
$ |
92,568 |
|
|
$ |
92,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
The $95.6 million term loans under the $112 million senior secured credit facility require the
company to make quarterly principal payments. Term Loan A bears interest at the Chase Manhattan
Banks prime rate plus 0.85% or LIBOR plus 3.35%. Term Loans B bear interest at the Chase
Manhattan Banks prime rate plus 2.95% or LIBOR plus 5.20%. Term Loan C bears interest at the
Chase Manhattan Banks prime rate plus 4.5% or LIBOR plus 7.0%. In addition, Term Loan C bears
additional paid in kind interest of 3.5%, added to the principal balance of Term Loan C on a
monthly basis. Interest is due quarterly on each term loan. The $112 million senior secured
credit facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.
On March 18, 2008, the Company issued to our controlling stockholder, Sun Mackie, a $7.5 million
Convertible Senior Subordinated Secured Promissory Note due 2012 (the Note) that is secured by
all of the assets of the Company now owned and thereafter acquired. The Note bears interest at a
rate of 15.25% per annum, payable in kind until maturity, and is convertible into common stock
stated at a conversion price of $5.00. We paid Sun Mackie a fee of $150,000 upon issuance of the
Note.
The company applied the guidance of Emerging Issue Task Force (EITF) No. 98-5, Accounting for
Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingent Adjustable Conversion
Ratios and EITF No. 00-27, Application of Issue No. 98-5 Certain Convertible Instruments and
concluded that the convertible debt included a beneficial conversion feature, which was valued at
$6.7 million using the fair value of the stock at the commitment date and the stated conversion
rate. This amount was determined by multiplying the shares to be issued upon conversion times the
intrinsic value per share. The number of shares shares to be issued upon conversion was calculated
by adding the proceeds of $7.5 million plus the unpaid accrued interest at maturity and dividing
this sum by the stated conversion price of $5.00. The intrinsic value per share is the difference
between the $7.35 fair value of the stock at commitment date less the stated conversion price. The
beneficial conversion feature was recorded as a debt discount, credited to additional paid in
capital, and is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the Note using the effective
interest method.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the Companys convertible debt issued in
March 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Face value of convertible debt(s) |
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
Less: unamortized debt discounts |
|
|
(6,339 |
) |
Add: accreted interest |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total carrying value, net of debt discount June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
The debt is considered long-term, as principal and interest are not due and payable until 2012.
The debt issuance costs associated with the financing are recorded as a long-term asset and are
being amortized over the term of the debt to interest expense using the effective interest method.
The debt issuance costs include cash costs of $318,000 for legal and Sun Mackie related fees.
9. Guarantees
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is not subject to any significant obligations under
guarantees that fall within the scope of FIN No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others except for
standard indemnification and warranty provisions and give rise only to the disclosure requirements
prescribed by FIN No. 45.
Indemnification and warranty provisions contained within the Companys sales agreements are
generally consistent with those prevalent in its industry. The duration of product warranties is
generally one to six years following delivery of products, with the exception of the Companys
Alvarez Yairi guitars, which have a limited lifetime warranty.
The warranty liability is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,065 |
|
|
$ |
1,160 |
|
Charged to cost of sales |
|
|
(941 |
) |
|
|
1,516 |
|
Applied to liability |
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
(1,766 |
) |
Foreign currency adjustment |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,074 |
|
|
$ |
910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Commitments and Contingencies
We are involved in various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of
business. We believe that these matters will not have a material adverse impact on our financial
position, liquidity or results of operations.
13
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. This discussion
contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our
plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Actual results may differ materially from those
discussed herein. The cautionary statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the
Annual Report on Form 10-K may apply to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear. We
undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements that
may be required to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any
statement that may predict, forecast, indicate, or imply future results, performance, or
achievements, and may contain the words believe, anticipate, expect, estimate, project,
will be, will continue, will likely result, or words or phrases of similar meaning.
Overview
LOUD Technologies Inc. was founded in 1988 and incorporated in Washington under the name Mackie
Designs Inc., and subsequently changed its name to LOUD Technologies Inc. LOUD is one of the
worlds largest dedicated pro audio and music products companies. As the corporate parent for
world-recognized brands Alvarez®, Ampeg®, Crate®, EAW®, Knilling®,
Mackie®, Martin Audio®, SIA® and
Tapco®, LOUD engineers, markets and distributes a wide range of professional audio and musical
instrument products worldwide. Additionally, LOUD is one of the largest distributors of branded
professional audio and music accessories through its SLM Marketplace catalog.
Our product lines include sound reinforcement speakers, analog mixers, guitar and bass amplifiers,
professional loudspeaker systems, and branded musical instruments. These products can be found in
professional and project recording studios, video and broadcast suites, post-production facilities,
sound reinforcement applications including churches and nightclubs, retail locations, and on major
musical concert tours. We distribute our products primarily through retail dealers, mail order
outlets and installed sound contractors. We have our primary operations in the United States with
smaller operations in the United Kingdom, Canada, China and Japan.
Our stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol LTEC.
MACKIE, the running man figure, TAPCO, EAW, and SIA are registered trademarks of LOUD
Technologies Inc. Alvarez, Ampeg, Crate, and Knilling are registered trademarks of our
wholly owned subsidiary, St. Louis Music, Inc. Martin Audio is a registered trademark of our
wholly owned subsidiary, Martin Audio, Ltd. To the extent our trademarks are unregistered, we are
unaware of any conflicts with trademarks owned by third parties. This document also contains names
and marks of other companies, and we claim no rights in the trademarks, service marks and trade
names of entities other than those
in which we have a financial interest or licensing right.
The financial statements herein have been prepared assuming the Company continues as a going
concern. While we were in compliance with applicable loan covenants as of June 30, 2008, we have
not offered assurances that we will remain in compliance in future periods. Were we to fall out of
compliance and fail to negotiate waivers or obtain additional sources of liquidity, our lenders
could foreclose on our assets or take other steps that may impede our ability to continue as a
going concern.
The Company is highly leveraged and maintains a number of credit arrangements that are critical to
our growth and to our ongoing operations. These credit agreements include certain financial
covenants and ratios and require that we maintain adequate levels of eligible collateral to support
our borrowing level, among other restrictions. In previous quarters, we have been in breach of
certain financial covenants in our senior credit facility, and we have received forbearances from
the lender and entered into waiver agreements with respect to the defaults and amended our credit
agreement. If future breaches of the covenants of our credit arrangements occur, there is no
assurance that the lenders would grant waivers or agree to restructure our debt or that we would be
able to obtain other financing. We are unable to offer assurances that we can remain in compliance
with such covenants in the future. If we default on our debt, our lenders have a variety of
remedies against us including accelerating all amounts so that they come due immediately and
foreclosing on their security interests, which would allow the creditors to take possession of all
of our assets.
14
Under the terms of the senior secured credit facility, we are required to maintain certain
financial ratios, such as a fixed charge coverage ratio and a consolidated leverage ratio. We are
also required to meet certain EBITDA targets and adhere to certain capital expenditure limits. The
agreement also provides, among other matters, restrictions on additional financing, dividends,
mergers, and acquisitions. As of June 30, 2008, we met all of our covenant requirements. The
Company is uncertain whether it will meet these covenants in third and fourth quarter 2008 and can
offer no assurances that it will remain in compliance with the terms of the credit agreement.
During July 2008 the Company experienced lower than expected sales and margins due to a backlog of
orders with a contract manufacturer. This decline, which we believe to be temporary, could
negatively impact EBITDA calculations.
In previous quarters, we have been in breach of certain financial covenants in our senior credit
facility and we have received forebearances from the lender and entered into waiver agreements with
respect to the defaults and amended our credit agreement. If breaches of the covenants of our
senior secured credit facility occur, there is no assurance that the lender would grant waivers or
agree to restructure our debt or that we would be able to obtain other financing. If we default on
our debt, the lender has a variety of remedies against us including accelerating all amounts so
that they come due immediately and foreclosing on their security interests, which would allow the
creditor to take possession of all of our assets. The accompanying financial statements do not
reflect any adjustments that might be required should the Company default on debt agreements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Judgments
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
We believe there have been no additional significant changes in our critical accounting policies
during the six months ended June 30, 2008 from that disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Estimates and Assumptions Related to Financial Statements
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements. The preparation of
these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates including
revenue recognition, the allowance
for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, intangible assets, income taxes and general business
contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that
we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form our basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
Results of Operations (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
54,981 |
|
|
$ |
50,583 |
|
|
$ |
109,130 |
|
|
$ |
101,536 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
17,111 |
|
|
|
14,534 |
|
|
|
32,927 |
|
|
|
28,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
11,533 |
|
|
|
11,032 |
|
|
|
23,523 |
|
|
|
22,533 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,583 |
|
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
5,615 |
|
|
|
5,631 |
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
14,378 |
|
|
|
14,398 |
|
|
|
29,434 |
|
|
|
29,718 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
2,733 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
3,493 |
|
|
|
(1,579 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
(3,627 |
) |
|
|
(2,910 |
) |
|
|
(6,826 |
) |
|
|
(7,126 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,050 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,735 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,562 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 vs. Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
Net Loss
Results of operations for the three months ended June, 2008, showed a net loss of approximately
$1.1 million, a decrease of $1.7 million from a net loss of $2.7 million for the comparable period
in 2007. Operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $2.7 million compared to
operating income of $0.1 million in the comparable period in 2007. The increase is a result
primarily from new Mackie products of $4.4 million which carry a higher gross profit on the 2008
sales.
Net Sales
Net sales increased by 8.7% to $55.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $50.6
million in the comparable period in 2007. The increase in sales compared to the prior year is
related to strength in the core brands of Mackie, Ampeg, and EAW, as well as, strong international
sales.
Gross Profit
Gross profit was $17.1 million, or 31.1% of net sales, in the three months ended June 30, 2008
compared to $14.5 million, or 28.7% of net sales, in the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Excluding the Martin Audio acquisition and the write down of inventory associated with the factory
shutdowns in 2007, gross profit was comparable to prior year results.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $0.5 million to $11.5 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2008 from $11.0 million in the comparable period in 2007. The increase
is primarily attributable to increased commissions and bonuses on higher sales volumes.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses decreased by $0.2 million to $2.6 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2008 from $2.8 million in the comparable period in 2007. The $0.2 million decrease
is due to a reduction in engineering projects and
prototype costs.
Restructuring Costs
We incurred approximately $262,000 in restructuring costs during the three-month period ended June
30, 2008, primarily attributed to employee severance and related costs for 3 terminated employees.
In the comparable period in 2007, approximately $536,000 in restructuring costs were incurred,
primarily representing severance accruals related to the closure and overseas transfer of our
domestic manufacturing plants and closure of our St. Louis Music engineering functions.
Other Expense
Other expense was $3.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to $2.9 million
in the comparable period last year. The increase in other expense of $0.7 million is primarily due
to the cost associated with the Sun Mackie $7.5 million Convertible Senior Subordinated Secured
Promissory Note due 2012 issued on March 18, 2008.
The majority of our debt has variable interest rates, and the interest expense component of other
income (expense) in future quarters will be affected by changing interest rates.
16
Income Taxes
Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $156,000 compared to a benefit of
($39,000) for the comparable period in 2007. The primary components of the 2008 income tax include
income tax expense of $0.3 million related to Martin Audio, $0.3 million associated with the
deferred tax benefit recorded as a result of the partial amortization of the deferred tax liability
recorded as a result of the acquisition of Martin Audio, and $0.1 million related to federal tax
expense. The primary components of the 2007 benefit are current taxes due from our foreign
subsidiaries and an increase to our income tax reserve offset by the deferred tax benefit recorded
as a result of the partial amortization of the deferred tax liability as a result of the
acquisition of Martin Audio.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 vs. Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
Net Sales
Net sales from continuing operations increased by 7.5% to $109.1 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2008 from $101.5 million in the comparable period in 2007. The majority of the
increase in sales was related to new Mackie products of $6.6 million along with increased sales in
our core brands, including Ampeg and EAW.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased to $32.9 million, or 30.2% of net sales, in the six months ended June 30,
2008 from $28.1 million, or 27.7% of net sales, in the six months ended June 30, 2007. Excluding
the Martin Audio acquisition and the write down of inventory associated with the factory shutdowns
in 2007 gross profit, was comparable to prior year results.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.0 million to $23.5 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2008 from $22.5 million in the comparable period in 2007. The increase was
primarily attributable to the increased commissions and bonuses on higher sales volumes.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $6.5 million,
comparable to the same period in 2007.
Restructuring Costs
Restructuring costs were $0.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily attributed
to employee severance and related costs for 10 employees. Restructuring costs were $1.6 million in
the six months ended June 30, 2007. The 2007 costs
were primarily severance accruals related to the closure and overseas transfer of our domestic
manufacturing plants and the closure of our St. Louis Music engineering functions.
Other Expense
Net other expense was $6.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to $7.1
million in the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in other expense of $0.3 million is
primarily due to the cost associated with the write-off of $2.5 million of unamortized fees related
to the prior debt facility as a result of the refinancing of the debt facility in 2007, which was
offset by an increase of approximately $1.6 million in interest expense incurred for the Ableco and
Sun Capital financing arrangements and a $0.1 million increase in management fees.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense for the first six months of 2008 was $229,000 compared to income tax benefit of
$5,000 for the comparable period in 2007. The primary components of the 2008 expense are current
taxes due from our foreign subsidiaries and an increase to our income tax reserve partially offset
by the deferred tax benefit recorded as a result of the partial amortization of the deferred tax
liability recorded as a result of the acquisition of Martin Audio. The primary component of the
2007 benefit are current taxes due from our foreign subsidiaries and an increase to our income tax
reserve offset by the deferred tax benefit recorded as a result of the partial amortization of the
deferred tax liability recorded as a result of the acquisition of Martin Audio.
17
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $4.7 million and short-term borrowings of
$3.7 million. At June 30, 2008 we had $6.3 million available on our revolving line of credit.
Net Cash Used in and Provided by Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities was $1.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared
to cash provided by operating activities of $1.6 million for the comparable period in 2007. The
net loss for the first six months of 2008 was $3.6 million including $2.6 million in depreciation
and amortization, $0.3 million in amortization of deferred financing fees, $0.9 million in interest
expense capitalized, and $0.1 million in stock based compensation expense. In the first six months
of 2008, an increase in accounts receivable of $3.4 million and an increase prepaid other current
assets of $1.8 million accompanied by a decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of
$6.3 million used cash, while a decrease to inventories of $10.2 million, provided cash. The net
loss for the first six months of 2007 was $8.7 million including $2.3 million in depreciation and
amortization, $2.8 million in amortization and write-off of deferred financing fees, $0.2 million
in stock based compensation expense, and a gain on asset dispositions of $0.5 million. In the
first six months of 2007, a decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $7.8 million
and increases to inventories and accounts receivable of $11.8 million and $2.0 million,
respectively, used cash.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $0.8 million for the first six months of 2008, compared to
$35.2 million for the first six months of 2007. The cash used in investing activities for the
first six months of 2008 primarily related to purchases of new product tooling. The cash used in
investing activities for the first six months of 2007 primarily related to the acquisition of
Martin Audio and the payment of the St. Louis Music, Inc. future commitment to pay of $3.2 million.
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities was $3.1 million during the first six months of 2008,
compared to $40.0 million during the first six months of 2007. Cash provided in the first three
months of 2008 is primarily attributable to the Sun Mackie Convertible Debt of $7.5 million which
was used to partially pay down the existing debt and line of credit. Cash provided in the first
six months of 2007 is primarily attributable to a new credit facility of $102.0 million consisting
of a Term Loan A of $20.0 million, a US Term Loan B of $40.0 million, a UK Term Loan B of $30.0
million and a Term Loan C of $12.1 million. Along with this refinance, we paid off our existing
credit facility of $67.2 million as of March 30, 2007, which consisted of a revolving loan facility
of $26.2 million, a Term Loan A of $11.9 million, a Term Loan B of $14.3 million and a senior
subordinated note for $14.8 million. We also incurred $2.9 million in deferred financing costs.
Ability to Stay in Compliance With Debt Covenants
Under the terms of the senior secured credit facility, we are required to maintain certain
financial ratios, such as a fixed charge coverage ratio and a consolidated leverage ratio. We are
also required to meet certain EBITDA targets and adhere to certain capital expenditure limits. The
agreement also provides, among other matters, restrictions on additional financing, dividends,
mergers, and acquisitions. As of June 30, 2008, we met all of our covenant requirements. The
Company is uncertain whether it will meet these covenants in third and fourth quarter 2008 and can
offer no assurances that it will remain in compliance with the terms of the credit agreement.
During July 2008 the Company experienced lower than expected sales and margins due to a backlog of
orders with a contract manufacturer. This decline, while we believe to be temporary, could
negatively impact EBITDA calculations.
In previous quarters, we have been in breach of certain financial covenants in our senior credit
facility and we have received forebearances from the lender and entered into waiver agreements with
respect to the defaults and amended our credit agreement. If breaches of the covenants of our
senior secured credit facility occur, there is no assurance that the lender would grant waivers or
agree to restructure our debt or that we would be able to obtain other financing. If we default on
our debt, the lender has a variety of remedies against us including accelerating all amounts so
that they come due immediately and foreclosing on their security interests, which would allow the
creditor to take possession of all of our assets. The accompanying financial statements do not
reflect any adjustments that might be required should the Company default on debt agreements.
18
Commitments
We had the following significant contractual commitments related to operating leases for equipment
facilities at June 30, 2008. In addition, we had significant obligations related to short-term and
long-term debt arrangements, excluding our accounts payable, accrued liabilities and taxes payable
of $32.3 million at June 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
5+ Years |
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
6,708 |
|
|
$ |
2,455 |
|
|
$ |
3,756 |
|
|
$ |
497 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Convertible debt,
including interest |
|
|
14,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,240 |
|
Short-term and long-term
debt, including interest |
|
|
130,087 |
|
|
|
12,242 |
|
|
|
23,782 |
|
|
|
94,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
151,035 |
|
|
$ |
14,697 |
|
|
$ |
27,538 |
|
|
$ |
94,560 |
|
|
$ |
14,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We also have purchase commitments that range between $20 million to $35 million that are primarily
due to our contract manufacturers.
We believe we will have adequate resources to meet our material obligations as they come due
through December 31, 2008.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in foreign currency rates and interest
rates.
Our $112.0 million term loans have variable interest rates. As such, changes in U.S. interest
rates affect interest paid on debt and we are exposed to interest rate risk. For the quarter ended
June 30, 2008, an increase in the average interest rate of 10%, i.e. from 9.8% to 10.8%, would have
resulted in an approximately $521,000 increase in net loss before income taxes.
A majority of our sales are denominated in U.S. Dollars, and during the three months ended June 30,
2008 approximately 39.5% of our sales were denominated in foreign currencies. We ordinarily do not
engage in hedging, rate swaps, or other
derivatives as a means to minimize our foreign currency risk and, instead, mitigate that exposure
by limiting the portion of our sales that are denominated in other than U.S. Dollars. Assuming the
same level of foreign currency denominated sales as in the three months ended June, 2008, a 10%
decline in the average exchange rates for all these currencies would have caused a decline of
approximately $2.0 million, or 3.6%, of our sales.
The majority of our products are manufactured by foreign third-party contract manufacturers with
the majority of the contracts denominated in U.S. Dollars. Foreign third-party manufacturing
creates risks that include fluctuations in currency exchange rates that could affect the price we
pay for our product. Our two largest foreign contract manufacturers products represented 64.9% of
our net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2008. A 10% increase to the cost of the product
sold that was manufactured by these two manufacturers would have resulted in an increase to cost of
sales for the six months ended June 30, 2008 of approximately $1.8 million.
Item 4 and Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
The Companys management maintains an adequate system of internal controls to promote the timely
identification and reporting of material, relevant information. Additionally the Companys senior
management team meets regularly to discuss significant transactions and events affecting the
Companys operations. The Companys executive officers lead these meetings and consider whether
topics discussed represent information that should be disclosed under generally accepted accounting
principles and the rules of the SEC. The board of directors includes an Audit Committee that is
comprised solely of independent directors who meet the financial literacy requirements imposed by
the Securities Exchange Act and the Nasdaq Stock Market. At least one member of our Audit
Committee, Jon W. Gacek, is a financial expert within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq
rules. The Audit Committee reviews quarterly earnings releases and all reports on Form 10-Q and
Form 10-K prior to their filing. The Audit Committee is responsible for hiring and overseeing the
Companys external auditors and meets with those auditors at least four times each year.
19
The Companys executive officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures. They have designed such controls to ensure that others make known to them
all material information within the organization. Management regularly evaluates ways to improve
internal controls. As of the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q our executive
officers completed an evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures and have determined them
to be functioning effectively.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting for the Company. Internal control over financial reporting, as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, is a process designed by, or under
the supervision of, the Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the Companys board of directors, management and
other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys
chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has established and maintained policies and
procedures designed to maintain the adequacy of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting, and includes those policies and procedures that:
|
1) |
|
Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the assets of the Company; |
|
|
2) |
|
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management of the Company; and |
|
|
3) |
|
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Companys
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Management has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of June 30, 2008 based on the control criteria established in a report entitled
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Based on our assessment and those criteria, the Companys
management has concluded that the Companys internal control over financial reporting is effective
as of June 30, 2008.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect all errors or misstatements and all fraud. Therefore, even those systems determined to be
effective can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the policies
and procedures are met. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
This report does not include an attestation report of the Companys registered public accounting
firm, KPMG LLP, regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not
subject to attestation by the Companys registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only
managements report in this report.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting that occurred
during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
20
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course
of business which could, individually or in the aggregate, be material to the Companys business,
operations or financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(a) |
|
Our annual meeting of shareholders was held on June 30, 2008 (the Annual Meeting). |
|
(b) |
|
At the Annual Meeting, James T. Engen, Jon W. Gacek and R. Lynn Skillen were elected to serve
as Class 1 directors for a three-year term. Thomas V. Taylor, Jason H. Neimark, Kevin J.
Calhoun and Mark E. Kuchenrither continue to serve as Class 2 directors and will be up for
re-election at the 2009 annual meeting. C. Daryl Hollis, George R. Rea, and Clarence E. Terry
continue to serve as Class 3 directors and will be up for re-election at the 2010 annual
meeting. |
|
(c) |
|
Following are descriptions of and results of votes cast on matters voted upon by the
shareholders at the Annual Meeting. |
|
|
|
The results of the shareholder vote on the election of directors were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee |
|
For |
|
Withheld |
James T. Engen |
|
|
4,535,846 |
|
|
|
95,717 |
|
Jon W. Gacek |
|
|
4,529,806 |
|
|
|
101,757 |
|
R. Lynn Skillen |
|
|
4,529,606 |
|
|
|
101,957 |
|
|
|
|
The results of the shareholder vote on the proposal to amend the Companys Restated
Articles of Incorporation to provide that the Companys Restated Articles of
Incorporation may be amended by the Board of Directors without shareholder action to
the extent permitted by Section 23B.10.020 of the Washington Business Corporation Act
were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Votes |
|
Outstanding |
For |
|
|
4,434,411 |
|
|
|
91.26 |
|
Against |
|
|
196,932 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
Abstain |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
.00 |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results of the shareholder vote on the proposal to amend the Companys Restated
Articles of Incorporation to provide that the name of the Company is LOUD Technologies,
Inc. were as follows: |
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Votes |
|
Outstanding |
For |
|
|
4,628,040 |
|
|
|
95.25 |
|
Against |
|
|
3,443 |
|
|
|
.07 |
|
Abstain |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
.00 |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results of the shareholder vote on the proposal to amend the Companys Restated
Articles of Incorporation to give effect to the adjustment of the Companys issued and
authorized common stock related to the Companys 2005 reverse split were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Votes |
|
Outstanding |
For |
|
|
4,619,781 |
|
|
|
95.08 |
|
Against |
|
|
10,022 |
|
|
|
.21 |
|
Abstain |
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
.04 |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results of the shareholder vote on the proposal to amend the Companys Restated
Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of the Companys authorized common
shares from 8 million to 12 million so as to provide additional authorized common
shares to be issued upon conversion of the Convertible Senior Subordinated Secured
Promissory Note issued to Sun Mackie, LLC on March 18, 2008, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Votes |
|
Outstanding |
For |
|
|
4,592,385 |
|
|
|
94.51 |
|
Against |
|
|
38,298 |
|
|
|
.79 |
|
Abstain |
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
.02 |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results of the shareholder vote on the proposal to approve the Convertible
Senior Subordinated Secured
Promissory Note issued to Sun Mackie, LLC on March 18, 2008, the Security Agreement, and
the transactions contemplated therein, including but not limited to issuance of shares of
the Companys common stock upon conversion of the Note, were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Votes |
|
Outstanding |
For |
|
|
4,574,160 |
|
|
|
98.81 |
|
Against |
|
|
55,203 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
Abstain |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
22
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOUD Technologies Inc. |
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
Dated: August 14, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ James T. Engen
|
|
|
|
James T. Engen |
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 14, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ David E. Olson
|
|
|
|
David E. Olson |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice
President, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal
Financial and
Accounting Officer) |
|
23
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Document Description |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
24