e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-52588
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Missouri
|
|
43-1823071 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
10401 Clayton Road
Frontenac, Missouri
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
63131
(Zip Code) |
(314) 569-7200
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act) Yes o No þ
As of October 31, 2008, the Registrant had 20,770,781 shares of outstanding Class A common stock,
$0.25 par value.
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Part I Item 1 Financial Statements
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
September 30, 2008 and 2007 and December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
12,717,479 |
|
|
|
10,836,678 |
|
|
|
13,170,564 |
|
Interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions |
|
|
2,041,867 |
|
|
|
98,598 |
|
|
|
89,876 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
Investments in available-for-sale debt and equity securities,
at fair value |
|
|
178,331,285 |
|
|
|
172,829,382 |
|
|
|
163,645,218 |
|
Loans |
|
|
1,225,166,080 |
|
|
|
839,091,832 |
|
|
|
911,960,236 |
|
Less - Deferred loan fees/costs |
|
|
(893,553 |
) |
|
|
(269,909 |
) |
|
|
(222,226 |
) |
Reserve for possible loan losses |
|
|
(12,398,957 |
) |
|
|
(8,890,557 |
) |
|
|
(9,685,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
1,211,873,570 |
|
|
|
829,931,366 |
|
|
|
902,052,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
44,491,084 |
|
|
|
41,032,014 |
|
|
|
42,931,925 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
5,442,661 |
|
|
|
5,179,664 |
|
|
|
4,959,629 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
of $86,869, $70,581 and $74,653 at September 30, 2008 and 2007,
and December 31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
157,450 |
|
|
|
173,738 |
|
|
|
169,666 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,149,192 |
|
|
|
1,149,192 |
|
|
|
1,149,192 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
11,653,385 |
|
|
|
1,612,286 |
|
|
|
4,937,285 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
8,271,407 |
|
|
|
3,137,029 |
|
|
|
3,016,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,476,129,380 |
|
|
|
1,066,018,947 |
|
|
|
1,136,152,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing |
|
$ |
54,401,841 |
|
|
|
46,139,342 |
|
|
|
53,441,589 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
1,042,132,382 |
|
|
|
753,325,445 |
|
|
|
781,134,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
1,096,534,223 |
|
|
|
799,464,787 |
|
|
|
834,576,449 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
86,214,611 |
|
|
|
72,320,906 |
|
|
|
88,324,915 |
|
Notes payable to Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
|
149,000,000 |
|
|
|
50,000,000 |
|
|
|
68,000,000 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
4,239,781 |
|
|
|
3,122,877 |
|
|
|
3,656,113 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,581,183 |
|
|
|
2,451,928 |
|
|
|
1,703,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,339,569,798 |
|
|
|
927,360,498 |
|
|
|
996,261,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.25 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized,
20,770,781, 20,660,116, and 20,682,075 shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2008 and 2007, and
December 31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
5,192,695 |
|
|
|
5,165,029 |
|
|
|
5,170,519 |
|
Surplus |
|
|
124,315,888 |
|
|
|
123,258,544 |
|
|
|
123,329,517 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
9,772,943 |
|
|
|
10,561,804 |
|
|
|
10,982,306 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost - 76,948 and 9,396 shares at
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively |
|
|
(964,488 |
) |
|
|
(112,752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income net unrealized
holding (losses) gains on available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
(1,757,456 |
) |
|
|
(214,176 |
) |
|
|
408,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
136,559,582 |
|
|
|
138,658,449 |
|
|
|
139,890,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,476,129,380 |
|
|
|
1,066,018,947 |
|
|
|
1,136,152,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
18,669,323 |
|
|
|
14,451,420 |
|
|
|
51,484,539 |
|
|
|
39,854,890 |
|
Interest and dividends on debt and equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
1,636,351 |
|
|
|
1,636,356 |
|
|
|
4,806,351 |
|
|
|
5,222,663 |
|
Exempt from Federal income taxes |
|
|
387,887 |
|
|
|
392,948 |
|
|
|
1,176,754 |
|
|
|
1,135,724 |
|
Interest on short-term investments |
|
|
51,471 |
|
|
|
34,568 |
|
|
|
162,797 |
|
|
|
464,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
20,745,032 |
|
|
|
16,515,292 |
|
|
|
57,630,441 |
|
|
|
46,678,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits |
|
|
8,662,923 |
|
|
|
8,536,764 |
|
|
|
25,694,396 |
|
|
|
24,884,820 |
|
Interest on short-term borrowings |
|
|
571,906 |
|
|
|
751,558 |
|
|
|
1,680,996 |
|
|
|
1,605,876 |
|
Interest on notes payable to Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
|
1,375,939 |
|
|
|
486,992 |
|
|
|
3,463,592 |
|
|
|
1,057,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
10,610,768 |
|
|
|
9,775,314 |
|
|
|
30,838,984 |
|
|
|
27,548,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
10,134,264 |
|
|
|
6,739,978 |
|
|
|
26,791,457 |
|
|
|
19,129,603 |
|
Provision for possible loan losses |
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
1,515,000 |
|
|
|
8,539,000 |
|
|
|
2,405,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision
for possible loan losses |
|
|
8,334,264 |
|
|
|
5,224,978 |
|
|
|
18,252,457 |
|
|
|
16,724,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
209,682 |
|
|
|
120,743 |
|
|
|
582,678 |
|
|
|
361,826 |
|
Net gains (losses) on sale of debt and equity securities |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,250 |
|
|
|
(7,026 |
) |
Other noninterest income |
|
|
374,521 |
|
|
|
292,871 |
|
|
|
1,095,250 |
|
|
|
921,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
584,320 |
|
|
|
413,614 |
|
|
|
1,990,178 |
|
|
|
1,276,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
4,219,635 |
|
|
|
3,258,328 |
|
|
|
12,628,179 |
|
|
|
9,266,254 |
|
Occupancy and equipment expense |
|
|
1,212,522 |
|
|
|
827,839 |
|
|
|
3,375,614 |
|
|
|
2,404,268 |
|
Postage, printing and supplies |
|
|
113,098 |
|
|
|
120,988 |
|
|
|
357,444 |
|
|
|
368,029 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
124,152 |
|
|
|
121,126 |
|
|
|
471,245 |
|
|
|
347,171 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
473,512 |
|
|
|
393,291 |
|
|
|
1,359,070 |
|
|
|
1,048,903 |
|
Advertising |
|
|
289,770 |
|
|
|
194,365 |
|
|
|
791,351 |
|
|
|
494,321 |
|
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
4,072 |
|
|
|
4,072 |
|
|
|
12,216 |
|
|
|
12,216 |
|
Other noninterest expenses |
|
|
1,364,110 |
|
|
|
627,251 |
|
|
|
3,655,767 |
|
|
|
1,881,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
7,800,871 |
|
|
|
5,547,260 |
|
|
|
22,650,886 |
|
|
|
15,822,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before applicable income taxes |
|
|
1,117,713 |
|
|
|
91,332 |
|
|
|
(2,408,251 |
) |
|
|
2,178,769 |
|
Applicable income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
266,621 |
|
|
|
(72,866 |
) |
|
|
(1,198,888 |
) |
|
|
484,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
851,092 |
|
|
|
164,198 |
|
|
|
(1,209,363 |
) |
|
|
1,694,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
0.08 |
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
20,687,321 |
|
|
|
20,654,884 |
|
|
|
20,656,388 |
|
|
|
20,238,722 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
0.08 |
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
20,920,384 |
|
|
|
21,704,099 |
|
|
|
21,048,143 |
|
|
|
21,224,967 |
|
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,209,363 |
) |
|
|
1,694,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(3,594,200 |
) |
|
|
131,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net income |
|
|
(312,250 |
) |
|
|
7,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax |
|
|
(3,281,950 |
) |
|
|
138,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax related to items of other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(1,115,863 |
) |
|
|
47,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
(2,166,087 |
) |
|
|
91,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(3,375,450 |
) |
|
|
1,786,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
stock- |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
holders |
|
|
|
stock |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
stock |
|
|
income |
|
|
equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
4,892,812 |
|
|
|
110,042,307 |
|
|
|
8,867,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(305,886 |
) |
|
|
123,496,592 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694,445 |
|
Issuance of 1,071,973 shares of
common stock (91,100 shares
from treasury) |
|
|
245,218 |
|
|
|
12,282,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
966,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,494,801 |
|
Stock options exercised -
100,000 shares |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
563,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
588,313 |
|
Treasury stock purchased -
104,128 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,123,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,123,461 |
) |
Issuance of 10,827 shares of
common stock (3,632 shares
from treasury) in connection
with Employee Stock
Purchase Plan |
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
83,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,411 |
|
800 shares of common stock
awarded to directors |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Stock issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,759 |
) |
Stock option expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,397 |
|
Change in valuation of
available-for-sale securities,
net of related tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,710 |
|
|
|
91,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
5,165,029 |
|
|
|
123,258,544 |
|
|
|
10,561,804 |
|
|
|
(112,752 |
) |
|
|
(214,176 |
) |
|
|
138,658,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
5,170,519 |
|
|
|
123,329,517 |
|
|
|
10,982,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408,631 |
|
|
|
139,890,973 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,209,363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,209,363 |
) |
Issuance of 9,615 shares of
common stock from treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,488 |
|
Stock options exercised -
101,000 shares (12,296
from treasury) |
|
|
22,176 |
|
|
|
519,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689,385 |
|
Treasury stock purchased -
105,324 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,305,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,305,000 |
) |
Issuance of 2,565 shares of
common stock from treasury
as partial payment for certain
operating leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,771 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,009 |
|
1,400 shares of common stock from
treasury awarded to directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,351 |
|
Stock option expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,946 |
|
Amortization of restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,880 |
|
Change in valuation of
available-for-sale securities,
net of related tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,166,087 |
) |
|
|
(2,166,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
5,192,695 |
|
|
|
124,315,888 |
|
|
|
9,772,943 |
|
|
|
(964,488 |
) |
|
|
(1,757,456 |
) |
|
|
136,559,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,209,363 |
) |
|
|
1,694,445 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,592,243 |
|
|
|
1,130,140 |
|
Provision for possible loan losses |
|
|
8,539,000 |
|
|
|
2,405,000 |
|
Capitalized interest expense on construction |
|
|
(85,984 |
) |
|
|
(439,669 |
) |
Stock option compensation cost |
|
|
421,946 |
|
|
|
305,397 |
|
Common stock awarded to directors |
|
|
13,351 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Amortization of restricted stock expense |
|
|
118,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
Losses on sale of other real estate |
|
|
38,525 |
|
|
|
10,389 |
|
Net (gains) losses on sale of debt and equity securities |
|
|
(312,250 |
) |
|
|
7,026 |
|
Increase in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
(483,032 |
) |
|
|
(767,334 |
) |
Increase in accrued interest payable |
|
|
583,668 |
|
|
|
383,735 |
|
Mortgage loans originated for sale in secondary market |
|
|
(18,076,916 |
) |
|
|
(6,915,625 |
) |
Mortgage loans sold in secondary market |
|
|
17,087,483 |
|
|
|
6,692,500 |
|
Other operating activities, net |
|
|
425,966 |
|
|
|
375,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
8,653,517 |
|
|
|
4,891,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of available-for-sale debt and equity securities |
|
|
(90,282,122 |
) |
|
|
(9,952,158 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities and calls of available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
45,513,113 |
|
|
|
24,712,652 |
|
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
27,252,250 |
|
|
|
4,547,333 |
|
Net increase in loans |
|
|
(325,613,463 |
) |
|
|
(175,998,335 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned |
|
|
1,141,834 |
|
|
|
3,681,227 |
|
Construction expenditures to finish other real estate |
|
|
(48,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of bank premises and equipment |
|
|
(5,565,726 |
) |
|
|
(10,929,789 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of bank premises and equipment |
|
|
105,685 |
|
|
|
60,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(347,496,954 |
) |
|
|
(163,878,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
261,957,774 |
|
|
|
120,867,782 |
|
(Decrease) increase in short-term borrowings |
|
|
(2,110,304 |
) |
|
|
1,858,385 |
|
Proceeds from notes payable to Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
|
93,000,000 |
|
|
|
30,000,000 |
|
Payments of notes payable to Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
|
(12,000,000 |
) |
|
|
(4,300,000 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(1,305,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,123,461 |
) |
Stock options exercised |
|
|
689,385 |
|
|
|
588,313 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
80,488 |
|
|
|
13,624,212 |
|
Payment of stock issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
340,312,343 |
|
|
|
161,486,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,468,906 |
|
|
|
2,500,095 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
13,290,440 |
|
|
|
8,474,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
14,759,346 |
|
|
|
10,974,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
30,341,300 |
|
|
|
27,548,609 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
676,000 |
|
Noncash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to other real estate in settlement of loans |
|
|
8,243,326 |
|
|
|
4,478,902 |
|
Loans made to facilitate the sale of other real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,912 |
|
Capitalized interest expense |
|
|
85,984 |
|
|
|
439,669 |
|
Common stock awarded to directors |
|
|
13,350 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Stock option compensation cost |
|
|
421,946 |
|
|
|
305,397 |
|
Amortization of restricted stock expense |
|
|
118,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for operating lease payments |
|
|
25,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) provides a full range of banking services to individual
and corporate customers throughout the St. Louis metropolitan area in Missouri and Illinois and
southwestern Florida through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Reliance Bank and Reliance Bank, F.S.B.
(the Banks).
The Company and Banks are subject to competition from other financial and nonfinancial institutions
providing financial products throughout the St. Louis metropolitan area and southwestern Florida.
Additionally, the Company and Banks are subject to the regulations of certain Federal and state
agencies and undergo periodic examinations by those regulatory agencies.
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and Banks conform to generally accepted
accounting principles within the banking industry. In compiling the consolidated financial
statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to change in a short period of time include
the determination of the reserve for possible loan losses, valuation of other real estate owned and
stock options, and determination of possible impairment of intangible assets. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management
all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair
presentation have been included. Certain amounts in the 2007 consolidated financial statements
have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation. Such reclassifications have no effect
on previously reported net income or stockholders equity.
Operating results for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily
indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the year ending
December 31, 2008. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Companys 2007 Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Principles of Consolidation
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
Banks. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Basis of Accounting
The Company and Banks utilize the accrual basis of accounting, which includes in the total of net
income all revenues earned and expenses incurred, regardless of when actual cash payments are
received or paid. The Company is also required to report comprehensive income, of which net income
is a component. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity (net assets) of a business
enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner
sources, including all changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from investments
by, and distributions to, owners.
6
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Cash Flow Information
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash equivalents include due from banks,
interest-earning deposits in banks (all of which are payable on demand), and Federal funds sold.
Certain balances maintained in other financial institutions generally exceed the level of deposits
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Stock Issuance Costs
The Company incurs certain costs associated with the issuance of its common stock. Such costs were
recorded as a reduction of equity capital.
New Accounting Standards
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48) clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes in financial statements and prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
FIN 48 became effective and was implemented in 2007 by the Company; however, Company management
believes that the Company maintains no uncertain tax positions for tax reporting purposes, and,
accordingly, no FIN 48 liability is required to be recorded.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157
Fair Value Measurements (FAS No. 157) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (FAS No. 159). In accordance
with the FASB Staff Position 157-2, Effective Date of SFAS No. 157, the Company has not applied the
provisions of FAS No. 157 to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities such as other real
estate owned and goodwill. The Company uses fair value measurements to determine fair value
disclosures.
The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets recorded at fair value:
Investments in Available-For-Sale Debt Securities - Investments in available-for-sale debt
securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Companys available-for sale debt
securities are measured at fair value using Level 2 valuations. The market evaluation utilizes
several sources which include observable inputs rather than significant unobservable inputs and,
therefore, fall into the Level 2 category. The table below presents the balances of available-for
sale debt securities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies
and corporations |
|
$ |
66,847,242 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
33,615,128 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
4,831,760 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
62,488,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
167,782,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans - The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis other than loans that
are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as impaired, management measures impairment in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan. At September 30, 2008, all impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair
value of the collateral. The fair value of the collateral is based upon an observable market price or current
7
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
appraised value, and, therefore, the Company classifies these assets in the nonrecurring
Level 2 category.
The total principal balance of impaired loans measured at fair value at September 30, 2008 was
$15,258,135.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share data is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential
dilution of earnings per share which could occur under the treasury stock method if contracts to
issue common stock, such as stock options, were exercised. The following table presents a summary
of per share data and amounts for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
851,092 |
|
|
|
164,198 |
|
|
|
(1,209,363 |
) |
|
|
1,694,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common
shares outstanding |
|
|
20,687,321 |
|
|
|
20,654,884 |
|
|
|
20,656,388 |
|
|
|
20,238,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
851,092 |
|
|
|
164,198 |
|
|
|
(1,209,363 |
) |
|
|
1,694,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common
shares outstanding |
|
|
20,687,321 |
|
|
|
20,654,884 |
|
|
|
20,656,388 |
|
|
|
20,238,722 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options |
|
|
233,063 |
|
|
|
1,049,215 |
|
|
|
391,755 |
|
|
|
986,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common
shares outstanding |
|
|
20,920,384 |
|
|
|
21,704,099 |
|
|
|
21,048,143 |
|
|
|
21,224,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 2 INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Identifiable intangible assets include the core deposit premium relating to the Companys
acquisition of The Bank of Godfrey, which is being amortized into noninterest expense on a
straight-line basis over 15 years. Amortization of the core deposit intangible assets existing at
September 30, 2008 will be $4,072 per quarter until completely amortized.
The excess of the Companys consideration given in its acquisition of The Bank of Godfrey over the
fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill, an intangible asset on the
consolidated balance sheets. Goodwill is the Companys only intangible asset with an indefinite
useful life, and the Company is required to test the intangible asset for impairment on an annual
basis. Impairment is measured as the excess of carrying value over the fair value of an intangible
asset with an indefinite life. No impairment writedown has thusfar been required on this
intangible asset.
NOTE 3 STOCK OPTIONS
The Company maintains various stock option plans. Prior to 2006, the Company applied the intrinsic
value-based method, as outlined in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, (APB 25) and related interpretations, in accounting for stock options
granted under these plans. Under the intrinsic value-based method, no compensation expense was
recognized if the exercise price of the Companys employee stock options was equal to or greater
than the market price of the
8
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
underlying stock on the date of the grant. Accordingly, prior to
2006, no compensation cost was recognized in the consolidated statements of income for stock options granted to employees, since
all options granted under the Companys stock option plans had an exercise price equal to or
greater than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of the grant.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
123(R) (FAS 123R) Share-based Payments. This statement replaces FAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB 25. FAS 123R requires that all stock-based
compensation be recognized as an expense in the financial statements and that such cost be measured
at the grant date fair value for all equity classified awards. The Company adopted this statement
using the modified prospective method, which requires the Company to recognize compensation expense
on a prospective basis for all outstanding unvested awards. Therefore, prior period financial
statements have not been restated. Under this method, in addition to reflecting compensation
expense for share-based awards granted after the adoption date, expense is also recognized to
reflect the remaining service period of awards that had been included in pro forma disclosures in
prior periods.
Based on the valuation and accounting uncertainties that outstanding options presented under
proposed accounting treatment at the time, the Board of Directors accelerated the vesting of
substantially all of the Companys outstanding stock options during the fourth quarter of 2005.
This action resulted in the remaining fair value of substantially all of the outstanding stock
options being recognized in 2005 as part of the pro-forma disclosures in previous periods.
The weighted average fair values of options granted during the first nine months of 2008 and 2007
were $2.24 and $3.87, respectively, for an option to purchase one share of Company common stock;
however, the Company has only been in existence since July 24, 1998, and the Companys common stock
is not actively traded on any exchange. Accordingly, the availability of fair value information
for the Companys common stock is limited. In using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to
value the options, several assumptions have been made in arriving at the estimated fair value of
the options granted during the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, including 0-20% volatility in
the Companys common stock price, no dividends paid on the common stock, an expected weighted
average option life of 6.0 years for options granted in 2008 and 2007, and a risk-free interest
rate approximating the U.S. Treasury rates for the applicable duration period. Any change in these
assumptions could have a significant impact on the effects of determining compensation costs.
9
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Following is a summary of the Companys stock option activity for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Granted Under |
|
|
Options Granted to Directors |
|
|
|
Incentive Stock Option Plans |
|
|
Under Nonqualified Plans |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Price |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Option Price |
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
per Share |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
6.57 |
|
|
|
1,648,200 |
|
|
$ |
6.63 |
|
|
|
576,000 |
|
Granted |
|
|
13.40 |
|
|
|
169,500 |
|
|
|
16.38 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
11.67 |
|
|
|
(4,500 |
) |
|
|
4.85 |
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
Exercised |
|
|
5.73 |
|
|
|
(90,000 |
) |
|
|
7.25 |
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
7.27 |
|
|
|
1,723,200 |
|
|
$ |
8.41 |
|
|
|
686,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
7.31 |
|
|
|
1,648,200 |
|
|
$ |
8.41 |
|
|
|
701,000 |
|
Granted |
|
|
12.89 |
|
|
|
91,000 |
|
|
|
11.58 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
13.87 |
|
|
|
(27,250 |
) |
|
|
9.14 |
|
|
|
(41,500 |
) |
Exercised |
|
|
6.83 |
|
|
|
(101,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
7.54 |
|
|
|
1,610,950 |
|
|
$ |
8.44 |
|
|
|
675,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average option prices for the 2,286,450 and 2,409,200 options outstanding at September
30, 2008 and 2007, were $7.81 and $7.59, respectively. At September 30, 2008, options to purchase
an additional 495,800 shares of Company common stock were available for future grants under the
various plans.
NOTE 4 DISCLOSURES ABOUT FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Banks issue financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of the
business of meeting the financing needs of their customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and may involve, to varying degrees,
elements of credit risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the balance sheets. The contractual
amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Banks have in particular classes
of these financial instruments.
The Banks exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the
financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented
by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Banks use the same credit policies in making
commitments and conditional obligations as they do for financial instruments included on the
balance sheets. Following is a summary of the Banks off-balance-sheet financial instruments at
September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments for which
contractual amounts represent: |
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
288,866,860 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
23,174,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
312,041,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation
of any condition established in the contract. Of the total commitments to extend credit at
September 30, 2008,
10
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
$117,666,096 was made at fixed rates of interest. Commitments generally have
fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since
certain of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash
requirements. The Banks evaluate each customers creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The
amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Banks upon extension of credit, is based
on managements credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies, but is generally
residential or income-producing commercial property or equipment, on which the Banks generally have
a superior lien.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Banks to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party, for which draw requests have historically not been made
thereon. Such guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing
arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as
that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
11
Part I Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The following presents managements discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition
and results of operations of Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) for the three and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. This discussion and analysis is intended to review the
significant factors affecting the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, and
provides a more comprehensive review which is not otherwise apparent from the consolidated
financial statements alone. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
consolidated financial statements included in this report and the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2007, included in our most recent Form 10-K.
The Company has prepared all of the consolidated financial information in this report in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP). In preparing the consolidated
financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Company makes estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of
revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. No assurances can be given that actual results
will not differ from those estimates.
Forward-Looking Statements
Readers should note that in addition to the historical information contained herein, some of the
information in this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal
securities laws. Forward-looking statements typically are identified with use of terms such as
may, will, expect, anticipate, estimate, potential, could, and similar words,
although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. These forward-looking
statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. There are important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements, certain of
which are beyond our control. These factors, risks and uncertainties are discussed in our most
recent Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as updated from time to
time in our future SEC filings. The Company does not intend to publicly revise or update
forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this
report.
Overview
The Company provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers
throughout the St. Louis metropolitan area in Missouri and Illinois and southwestern Florida
through the 26 locations of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Reliance Bank and Reliance Bank, FSB
(hereinafter referred to as the Banks). The Company was incorporated and began its development
stage activities on July 24, 1998. Such development stage activities (i.e., applying for a banking
charter, raising capital, acquiring property, and developing policies and procedures, etc.) led to
the opening of Reliance Bank (as a new bank) upon receipt of all regulatory approvals on April 16,
1999. Since its opening in 1999 through September 30, 2008, Reliance Bank has added 20 branch
locations in the St. Louis metropolitan area of Missouri and Illinois and Loan Production Offices
(LPOs) in Houston, Texas and Phoenix, Arizona and has grown its total assets, loans and deposits
to $1.4 billion, $1.1 billion, and $1.0 billion, respectively, at September 30, 2008.
Effective May 31, 2003, the Company purchased The Bank of Godfrey, a Godfrey, Illinois state
banking institution. The Godfrey bank was merged with and into Reliance Bank on October 31, 2005.
Reliance Bank also opened a LPO in Ft. Myers, Florida on July 1, 2004. Effective January 17, 2006,
the Company opened a new Federal Savings Bank, Reliance Bank, FSB, in Ft. Myers, Florida, and loans
totaling approximately $14 million that were originated by the Reliance Bank LPO were transferred
to Reliance Bank, FSB. Since its opening in 2006 through September 30, 2008, Reliance Bank, FSB
has added four branch locations in southwestern Florida and has grown its total assets, loans, and
deposits to $110.3 million, $87.1 million, and $75.7 million, respectively, at September 30, 2008.
At September 30, 2008, Reliance Banks total assets, total revenues, and net income represented
92.51%, 93.39%, and (81.81%), respectively, of the Companys consolidated total assets, total
revenues, and net loss. Reliance Bank, FSBs total assets, total revenues, and net loss
represented 7.48%, 6.78%, and 152.20%, respectively, of the Companys consolidated totals. The
Company incurred a net loss of $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
12
During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company completed building its St. Louis metropolitan
branch network. The Company plans to continue building its branch network in southwestern Florida,
with three additional branches planned; however, the building of these branches has been suspended
while management focuses on Reliance Bank, FSBs profitability. The Companys branch expansion
plans are designed to increase the Companys market share in the St. Louis metropolitan area in
Missouri and Illinois and southwestern Florida and to allow the Companys banking subsidiaries to
compete with much larger financial institutions in these markets. The Houston and Phoenix LPOs
are intended to benefit from commercial and residential lending and fee income generation
opportunities in these larger and historically higher-growth markets.
The St. Louis metropolitan, southwestern Florida, Houston and Phoenix markets in which the
Companys banking subsidiaries operate are highly competitive in the financial services area. The
Banks are subject to competition from other financial and nonfinancial institutions providing
financial products throughout these markets.
The Companys total consolidated assets increased to $1.5 billion at September 30, 2008, with loans
and deposits increasing to $1.2 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, primarily as a result of
the Companys continued emphasis on growth to improve its market share. The branch locations of the
Banks have provided the Company with excellent strategic locations from which depositors and
borrowers can be accessed. Three Reliance Bank branches were opened in 2008, six Reliance Bank
branches were opened in 2006, one branch was opened in 2005, four branches were opened in 2004, two
branches were opened in 2003, and one branch was opened each year in 2002, 2001, and 1999. Three
Reliance Bank, FSB branches were opened in 2007 and one branch was opened in 2006. The Company has
sought to staff each new branch location with an experienced commercial lender familiar with that
branchs market area and other experienced banking personnel.
The Company has funded its Banks branch expansion with several private placement stock offerings
made to accredited investors since its inception. The Company has held a total of 13 such offerings
since its inception and has sold a net 20,770,781 shares of Company Common Stock for a total of
$129.5 million through September 30, 2008.
The Companys consolidated net income (loss) for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008
and 2007 totaled $(1,209,363) and $1,694,445, respectively. Consolidated net income for the
three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $851,092 and $164,198, respectively.
While the Companys consolidated total assets and net interest income have continued to grow, the
Company has continued to experience pricing pressures on its loans and deposits, and the provision
for possible loan losses was increased for an increase in nonperforming loans, resulting from a
softening in the real estate markets in which the Companys banking subsidiaries operate and the
overall economic downturn experienced nationally. These factors and their effect on the Companys
results of operations are discussed in more detail below.
Net interest income before the provision for possible loan losses for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $26,791,457 and $19,129,603, respectively. Net interest income
before the provision for possible loan losses for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008
and 2007 totaled $10,134,264 and $6,739,978, respectively. This growth in net interest income
resulted from an increasing level of interest-earning assets during this time period, with an
increasingly proportionate share of such interest-earning assets being comprised of loans, which
are the Companys highest interest-earning assets.
Holding down the net interest income earned by the Company during these periods was an increasing
cost of funds on an increasing total of interest-bearing liabilities. Interest expense incurred on
interest-bearing liabilities for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled
$30,838,984 and $27,548,609, respectively. Interest expense incurred on interest-bearing
liabilities for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $10,610,768 and $9,775,314,
respectively.
The softening of the real estate market and the overall economic downturn that has occurred during
the past twelve to eighteen months on a national scale has also been experienced in the St. Louis
metropolitan and southwestern Florida areas. Residential home building and sales have declined
significantly from the levels enjoyed prior to 2007. As a result, the Company has experienced an
increase in nonperforming assets (which include nonperforming loans and other real estate owned).
Nonperforming assets totaled $26.9 million at September 30, 2008 compared with $10.4 million at
September 30, 2007. The reserve for possible loan losses as a percentage of net outstanding loans
was 1.01% at September 30, 2008 compared with 1.06% at September 30, 2007. Net charge-offs for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 totaled $5.8 million compared with $615 thousand for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007.
13
Net charge-offs for the three months ended September 30, 2008 totaled $2.1 million compared with
$161 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The provision for possible loan
losses charged to expense for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled
$8,539,000 and $2,405,000, respectively, and $1,800,000 and $1,515,000 for the three-month periods
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in the provision for loan losses in
these nine and three-month periods of 2008 was a direct reaction to the continued softening of the
real estate market and overall economic downturn. See further discussion regarding the Companys
management of credit risk in the section below entitled Risk Management.
As the Company has grown its assets, the total of noninterest income has grown and new products
have been introduced. Total noninterest income for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008
and 2007 was $1,990,178 and $1,276,336, respectively, and $584,320 and $413,614 for the three-month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Companys fixed rate mortgage lending operation, which was established to arrange for long-term
fixed rate commercial real estate financing with institutional investors, generated commission
income of $228,671 and $418,825 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and $145,800 and $100,500 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively. Residential mortgage lending operations (in which fixed rate loans are
originated and sold in the secondary market) were also expanded beginning in 2007. Total income
from these secondary market activities was $220,180 and $180,956 for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $41,538 and $48,256 for the three-month periods
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Deposit service charge income also increased due
to a larger deposit base. The Company also sold $27.3 million of available-for-sale investment
securities in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 for a net gain of $312,250. During
the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Company sold $4.2 million of available-for-sale
investment securities for a net gain of $117.
Noninterest expenses have increased significantly during the nine and three-month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, resulting from the Companys branch expansion program and increased
level of problem assets. Total noninterest expense was $22,650,886 and $15,822,170 for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $7,800,871 and $5,547,260
for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Companys effective tax rate for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was
49.78% and 22.23%, respectively, and 23.85% and 79.78% for the three-month periods ended September
30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The change in effective tax rates during these periods is a
result of the effect that tax-exempt interest income levels have on this percentage.
The Companys basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the nine and three-month periods
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, reflect the Companys focus on growth in equity ownership and
total assets, loans and deposits, with less of an emphasis on short-term earnings per share, as
well as the problems experienced in the real estate markets of the St. Louis metropolitan area and
southwestern Florida. Basic earnings (loss) per share were $(0.06) and $0.08 per share for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $.04 and $.01 per share for
the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Fully-diluted earnings
(loss) per share for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were $(0.06) and
$0.08 per share, respectively, and $0.04 and $.01 for the three-month periods ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
Following are certain of the Companys ratios generally followed in the banking industry for the
three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the |
|
|
As of and for the |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, |
|
|
Quarters Ended Sept. 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Percentage of net income to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total assets |
|
|
(0.12 |
)% |
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
Average stockholders equity |
|
|
(1.16 |
)% |
|
|
1.71 |
% |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
|
|
0.47 |
% |
Percentage of common dividends declared
to net income per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of average stockholders equity
to average total assets |
|
|
10.60 |
% |
|
|
13.52 |
% |
|
|
9.43 |
% |
|
|
13.35 |
% |
14
Critical Accounting Policies
The impact and any associated risks related to the Companys critical accounting policies on
business operations are discussed throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial
results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see
the Companys consolidated financial statements as of and for year ended December 31, 2007 and the
related Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included in our Form 10-K, which was filed March 28, 2008. Management believes there have been no
material changes to our critical accounting policies during the first nine months of 2008.
Results of Operations for the Three and Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
Net Interest Income
The Companys net interest income increased $7,661,854 (40.05%) to $26,791,457 for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2008 from the $19,129,603 earned during the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2007. The Companys net interest margin for the nine-month periods ended September
30, 2008 and 2007 was 2.90% and 2.80%, respectively. The Companys net interest income increased
$3,394,286 (50.36%) to $10,134,264 for the three-month period ended September 30, 2008 from the
$6,739,978 earned during the three-month period ended September 30, 2007. The Companys net
interest margin for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was 2.96% and 2.76%,
respectively.
Average earning assets for the first nine months of 2008 increased $320,500,787 (34.44%) to
$1,251,070,616 from the level of $930,569,829 for the first nine months of 2007. Average earning
assets for the third quarter of 2008 increased $402,539,742 (41.07%) to $1,382,742,565 from the
level of $980,202,823 for the third quarter of 2007. This strong growth in interest earning assets
was primarily due to the growth in the loan portfolio. Total average loans for the first nine
months of 2008 increased $333,958,709 (45.35%) to $1,070,366,888 from the level of $736,408,179 for
the first nine months of 2007. Total average loans for the third quarter of 2008 increased
$388,825,400 (48.42%) to $1,191,904,958 from the level of $803,079,558 for the third quarter of
2008. The Companys addition of LPOs in Houston and Phoenix and expanding branch program and
practice of adding an experienced commercial lender at each new branch were the primary reasons for
the strong growth in the Companys loan portfolio during these periods.
Total average investment securities for the first nine months of 2008 decreased $8,483,436 (4.64%)
to $174,348,180 from the level of $182,831,616 for the first nine months of 2007. Total average
investment securities for the third quarter of 2008 increased $7,224,687 (4.12%) to $182,478,731
from the level of $175,254,044 for the third quarter of 2007. The Company uses its investment
portfolio to (a) provide support for borrowing arrangements for securities sold under repurchase
agreements, (b) provide support for pledging purposes for deposits of governmental and municipality
deposits over $100,000, (c) provide a secondary source of liquidity through laddered maturities
of such securities, and (d) provide increased interest income over that which would be earned on
overnight/daily fund investments. The total carrying value of securities pledged to secure public
funds and repurchase agreements was approximately $134.1 million at September 30, 2008. The Banks
have also pledged letters of credit from the Federal Home Loan Banks totaling $44,615,000 as
additional collateral to secure public funds at September 30, 2008.
Average short-term investments can fluctuate significantly from day to day based on a number of
factors, including, but not limited to, the collected balances of customer deposits, loan demand
and investment security maturities. Excess funds not invested in loans or investment securities
are invested in overnight funds with various unaffiliated financial institutions. The average
balances of such short-term investments for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and
2007 were $6,355,548 and $11,330,034, respectively. The average balances of such short-term
investments for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were $8,358,876 and $1,869,221,
respectively.
A key factor in attempting to increase the Companys net interest margin is to maintain a higher
percentage of earning assets in the loan category, which is the Companys highest earning asset
category. Average loans as a percentage of average earning assets were 85.56% for the first nine
months of 2008, which was a 6.42% increase over the 79.14%
15
achieved in the first nine months of 2007. Average loans as a percentage of average earning assets
were 86.20% for the third quarter of 2008, which was a 4.27% increase over the 81.93% achieved in
the third quarter of 2007.
Funding the Companys growth in interest-earning assets has been a challenge in the markets in
which the Companys banking subsidiaries operate. When the stock market was rebounding over the
past three years from its depressed levels in 2004 and 2003, deposits were not as plentiful in the
banking market overall, until the second half of 2007, when a softening real estate economy
significantly reduced loan demand. The stock market has also declined from its record levels in
2007. Additionally, the St. Louis metropolitan area has added over ten new banks in recent years
(as well as several institutions such as Reliance Bank adding numerous branches), resulting in an
intensely competitive environment for customer deposits during the past few years. Competition for
deposits in southwestern Florida has been equally as intense as the market for deposits in the St.
Louis metropolitan area. As a result, the Company has had to supplement its deposit growth with
alternate funding sources, including short-term overnight borrowings from unaffiliated financial
institutions, sweep repurchase agreement borrowing arrangements with several of the Companys
larger depositors, and longer term advances from the Federal Home Loan Banks. Additionally, the
inflated rates at which deposits have been offered in such competitive markets have served to
offset the gains achieved in the Companys net interest margin from loan growth.
Total average interest-bearing deposits for the first nine months of 2008 were $911,769,174, an
increase of $188,976,231 (26.15%) from the level of $722,792,943 for the first nine months of 2007.
Total average interest-bearing deposits for the third quarter of 2008 were $1,014,441,074, an
increase of $273,754,703 (36.96%) from the level of $740,686,371 for the third quarter of 2007.
This increase in deposits resulted from the Companys aggressive branch expansion and aggressive
pricing of deposits. The Companys banking subsidiaries have sought to be aggressive on deposits,
without necessarily being the highest rate available in their markets.
The Companys short-term borrowings consist of overnight funds borrowed from unaffiliated financial
institutions and securities sold under sweep repurchase agreements with larger deposit customers.
The averages for securities sold under sweep repurchase agreements for the first nine months of
2008 and 2007 were $40,416,939 and $27,731,031, respectively. The averages for securities sold
under sweep repurchase agreements for the third quarters of 2008 and 2007 were $38,360,162 and
$28,839,047, respectively. Securities sold under sweep repurchase agreements have continued to
provide a stable source of funding from certain of the Companys larger depositors. The averages
for funds purchased through daily/overnight borrowing arrangements for the first nine months of
2008 and 2007 totaled $41,160,319 and $15,153,822, respectively. The averages for funds purchased
through daily/overnight borrowing arrangements for the third quarters of 2008 and 2007 totaled
$51,316,409 and $28,768,859, respectively. Daily/overnight funds are used for short-term liquidity
purposes as a less expensive alternative to the intensely competitive deposit market.
The Company also uses longer-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank as a less expensive
alternative to the intensely competitive deposit market, particularly when such longer-term fixed
rate advances can be matched up with longer-term fixed rate assets. The average balance of Federal
Home Loan Bank advances grew $88,813,543 (282.04%) to $120,302,920 for the first nine months of
2008, compared with $31,489,377 for the first nine months of 2007. The average balance of Federal
Home Loan Bank advances grew $102,576,088 (241.66%) to $145,021,740 for the third quarter of 2008,
compared with the $42,445,652 average balance for the third quarter of 2007.
The overall mix of the Companys funding sources has a significant impact on the Companys net
interest margin. Following is a summary of the percentage of the various components of average
interest-bearing liabilities and noninterest-bearing deposits to the total of all average
interest-bearing liabilities and noninterest-bearing deposits (hereinafter described as total
funding sources) for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Average deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
|
4.47 |
% |
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
|
4.71 |
% |
|
|
5.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction accounts |
|
|
12.33 |
|
|
|
19.66 |
|
|
|
14.14 |
|
|
|
18.34 |
|
Savings |
|
|
3.64 |
|
|
|
6.72 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
|
|
7.37 |
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Time deposits of $100,000 or more |
|
|
28.75 |
|
|
|
23.86 |
|
|
|
28.58 |
|
|
|
26.60 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
32.86 |
|
|
|
33.14 |
|
|
|
31.11 |
|
|
|
33.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
77.58 |
|
|
|
83.38 |
|
|
|
78.02 |
|
|
|
86.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average deposits |
|
|
82.05 |
|
|
|
88.74 |
|
|
|
82.73 |
|
|
|
91.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average short-term borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sweep repurchase agreements |
|
|
2.93 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
|
Daily/overnight funds purchased |
|
|
3.93 |
|
|
|
3.24 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average short-term borrowings |
|
|
6.86 |
|
|
|
6.49 |
|
|
|
6.98 |
|
|
|
5.10 |
|
Average longer-term advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
|
11.09 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
|
|
|
10.29 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The composition of the Companys deposit portfolio has fluctuated as new branches were added, which
served to diversify the Companys deposit base. The overall level of interest rates will also
cause fluctuations between categories. The Company has sought to increase the percentage of its
noninterest-bearing deposits to the total of all funding sources; however, in the competitive
markets in which the Companys banking subsidiaries operate, this has been difficult. Over the past
two years, the Company modified its pricing strategies on its savings (reducing rates) and
transaction accounts (raising rates) products, resulting in a significant shift in mix from savings
to interest-bearing transaction accounts. For the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, the
Companys most significant funding source has continued to be certificates of deposit, which
comprised 59.69% of total average funding sources during the first nine months of 2008, as compared
with 60.30% during the first nine months of 2007. Certificates of deposit have a lagging effect
with interest rate changes, as most certificates of deposit have longer maturities at fixed rates.
Due to the instability in the wholesale funding market, opportunity arose to take advantage of a
lower cost of funds in the wholesale market compared to retail deposits. The positive result of
this increase is reflected in the Companys improved net interest margin for the first nine months
of 2008; however, this has significantly tightened the Companys liquidity.
The following table sets forth, on a tax-equivalent basis for the period indicated, a summary of
the changes in interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in volume and changes in
yield/rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Nine Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change From 2007 to 2008 Due to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (1) |
|
|
Rate (2) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Volume (1) |
|
|
Rate (2) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
6,249,348 |
|
|
|
(2,028,919 |
) |
|
|
4,220,429 |
|
|
$ |
16,492,495 |
|
|
|
(4,862,334 |
) |
|
|
11,630,161 |
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
89,866 |
|
|
|
(89,871 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(340,830 |
) |
|
|
(75,482 |
) |
|
|
(416,312 |
) |
Exempt from Federal income taxes |
|
|
(8,413 |
) |
|
|
66,392 |
|
|
|
57,979 |
|
|
|
45,155 |
|
|
|
(11,276 |
) |
|
|
33,879 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
52,736 |
|
|
|
(35,833 |
) |
|
|
16,903 |
|
|
|
(162,547 |
) |
|
|
(139,591 |
) |
|
|
(302,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
6,383,537 |
|
|
|
(2,088,231 |
) |
|
|
4,295,306 |
|
|
|
16,034,273 |
|
|
|
(5,088,683 |
) |
|
|
10,945,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing transaction accounts |
|
|
(138,771 |
) |
|
|
(912,850 |
) |
|
|
(1,051,621 |
) |
|
|
341,814 |
|
|
|
(2,388,991 |
) |
|
|
(2,047,177 |
) |
Savings accounts |
|
|
(76,487 |
) |
|
|
(181,376 |
) |
|
|
(257,863 |
) |
|
|
(260,113 |
) |
|
|
(564,290 |
) |
|
|
(824,403 |
) |
Time deposits of $100,000 or more |
|
|
1,658,870 |
|
|
|
(864,209 |
) |
|
|
794,661 |
|
|
|
3,659,489 |
|
|
|
(1,698,420 |
) |
|
|
1,961,069 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
1,373,309 |
|
|
|
(732,327 |
) |
|
|
640,982 |
|
|
|
2,641,415 |
|
|
|
(921,328 |
) |
|
|
1,720,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
2,816,921 |
|
|
|
(2,690,762 |
) |
|
|
126,159 |
|
|
|
6,382,605 |
|
|
|
(5,573,029 |
) |
|
|
809,576 |
|
Funds purchased and securities sold
under repurchase agreements |
|
|
305,360 |
|
|
|
(485,012 |
) |
|
|
(179,652 |
) |
|
|
1,017,529 |
|
|
|
(942,409 |
) |
|
|
75,120 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
985,483 |
|
|
|
(96,536 |
) |
|
|
888,947 |
|
|
|
2,577,181 |
|
|
|
(171,502 |
) |
|
|
2,405,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
4,107,764 |
|
|
|
(3,272,310 |
) |
|
|
835,454 |
|
|
|
9,977,315 |
|
|
|
(6,686,940 |
) |
|
|
3,290,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
2,275,773 |
|
|
|
1,184,079 |
|
|
|
3,459,852 |
|
|
$ |
6,056,958 |
|
|
|
1,598,257 |
|
|
|
7,655,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Change in volume multiplied by yield/rate of prior year. |
17
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Change in yield/rate multiplied by volume of prior year. |
|
|
|
NOTE: |
|
The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated to volume and rate
changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in
each. |
During the last half of 2007 through the third quarter of 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank has
lowered its Federal funds target interest rate 3.25%, in an attempt to stimulate the sluggish
national economy. Such actions have caused the overall rates earned and paid by the Company to be
lowered; however, not all financial instruments reprice at the same time. Floating rate loans
reprice immediately, while certificates of deposit and other fixed rate instruments have a lagging
effect with interest rate changes. Competition will also cause interest rates to react
differently.
Provision for Possible Loan Losses
The provision for possible loan losses charged to earnings for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $8,539,000 and $2,405,000, respectively. The provision for
possible loan losses charged to earnings for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and
2007 was $1,800,000 and $1,515,000, respectively. Net charge-offs for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $5,825,054 and $615,474, respectively. Net charge-offs for the
three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $2,083,464 and $161,614,
respectively. At September 30, 2008 and 2007, the reserve for possible loan losses as a percentage
of net outstanding loans was 1.01% and 1.06%, respectively. During Reliance Banks first three
years of existence (1999, 2000, and 2001), Reliance Bank was required by the Missouri Division of
Finance to maintain a minimum reserve for possible loan losses of at least 1.00% of net outstanding
loans. Reliance Bank, FSB has a similar requirement through the year ended December 31, 2008.
Accordingly, since its inception, the Company has sought to maintain its reserve for possible loan
losses at a level of approximately 1.00% to 1.10% of net outstanding loans. The reserve for
possible loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans (comprised of loans for which the
accrual of interest has been discontinued and loans still accruing interest that were 90 days
delinquent) was 81.26% and 100.83% at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The continued
softening of the real estate market and overall economic downturn have resulted in an increase in
the level of nonperforming loans and a higher provision for loan losses in the first nine months of
2008. See further discussion regarding the Companys credit risk management in the section below
entitled Risk Management.
Noninterest Income
Total noninterest income for the first nine months of 2008, excluding security sale gains and
losses, increased $394,566 (30.14%) to $1,677,928 from the $1,283,362 earned for the first nine
months of 2007. Total noninterest income for the third quarter of 2008, excluding security sale
gains and losses, increased $170,589 (41.24%) to $584,203 from the $413,614 earned for the third
quarter of 2007. The commercial real estate brokerage department earned commission income of
$228,671 and $418,825 for the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, respectively. The commercial
real estate brokerage department earned commission income of $145,800 and $100,500 for the third
quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Commissions are earned by this department for arranging
long-term, fixed rate commercial real estate financing for customers with institutional investors.
Secondary market residential mortgage fee income was $220,180 and $180,956 for the first nine
months of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Secondary market residential mortgage fee income was
$41,538 and $48,256 for the third quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively. These secondary market
originators make long-term, fixed rate residential loans which are then sold into the secondary
market. The company was a relatively new entrant into the secondary mortgage market, having just
ramped up this business in 2007. Even with the softening of the real estate market, the secondary
market has continued to remain relatively strong, but only at certain price points. Service
charges on deposit accounts increased $220,852 (61.04%) to $582,678 for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2008 from $361,826 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, due to the
increased level of customer deposits and the fees generated by the Banks overdraft privilege
programs. During the first nine months of 2008, the Company also sold $27.3 million of
available-for-sale investment securities for a net gain of $312,250. From time to time, the
Company will sell its available-for-sale investment securities for short-term liquidity purposes or
longer-term asset/liability management reasons. See further discussion below in the sections
entitled Risk Management and Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense increased $6,828,716 (43.16%) for the first nine months of 2008 to $22,650,886
from the $15,822,170 incurred during the first nine months of 2007. Noninterest expense increased
$2,253,611 (40.63%) for the third quarter
18
of 2008 to $7,800,871 from the $5,547,260 incurred during the third quarter of 2007. Most of the
categories of noninterest expense increased due to the addition of six new branches and two LPOs
during 2007 and 2008. The largest single component of the increase in noninterest expense for the
first nine months and third quarter of 2008 was the category of salaries and employee benefits.
Total personnel costs increased $3,361,925 (36.28%) for the first nine months of 2008 to
$12,628,179 from the $9,266,254 of personnel costs incurred for the first nine months of 2007.
Total personnel costs increased $961,307 (29.50%) for the third quarter of 2008 to $4,219,635 from
the $3,258,328 of personnel costs incurred for the third quarter of 2007. The Companys branch
expansion program includes the hiring of personnel in each location with strong banking skills,
including a seasoned commercial lender in each location. Due to the slowing economy, the Company
has placed the opening of any new branches on hold. The Company had planned to open three
additional branches in Florida in 2008.
The increased number of branches resulted in a growing level of occupancy and equipment expenses
(including leases for temporary facilities during construction) during the first nine months and
third quarter of 2008 compared with the first nine months and third quarter of 2007. Total
occupancy and equipment expenses increased $971,346 (40.40%) to $3,375,614 for the first nine
months of 2008 from the $2,404,268 incurred in the first nine months of 2007. Total occupancy and
equipment expenses increased $384,683 (46.47%) to $1,212,522 for the third quarter of 2008 from the
$827,839 incurred in the third quarter of 2007.
Total data processing expenses for the first nine months of 2008 increased $310,167 (29.57%) to
$1,359,070, as compared with the $1,048,903 of expenses incurred for the first nine months of 2007.
Total data processing expenses for the third quarter of 2008 increased $80,221 (20.40%) to
$473,512, as compared with the $393,291 of expenses incurred for the third quarter of 2007. The
increased number of customer accounts and additional new products offered has resulted in this
increase in data processing expenses.
Total advertising expenses for the first nine months of 2008 increased $297,030 (60.09%) to
$791,351, as compared with the $494,321 of expenses incurred for the first nine months of 2007.
Total advertising expenses for the third quarter of 2008 increased $95,405 (49.09%) to $289,770, as
compared with the $194,365 of expenses incurred for the third quarter of 2007. The increase is
primarily related to the Companys new branding and entry into the television media market.
Total professional fees increased $124,074 (35.74%) for the first nine months of 2008 to $471,245
from the $347,171 incurred for the first nine months of 2007. Total professional fees increased
$3,026 (2.50%) for the third quarter of 2008 to $124,152 from the $121,126 incurred for the third
quarter of 2007. Increased professional and legal costs relating to the Companys nonperforming
loans and charge-offs has contributed to this increase.
Other noninterest expenses increased $1,774,759 (94.35%) to $3,655,767 for the first nine months of
2008, from the $1,881,008 incurred for the first nine months of 2007. Other noninterest expenses
increased $736,859 (117.47%) to $1,364,110 for the third quarter of 2008, from the $627,251
incurred for the third quarter of 2007. The increase during these periods is primarily due to (a)
increased expenses relating to the operations of the Companys expanding branch network, (b)
additional costs incurred with its nonperforming assets, (c) an additional write-down on the value
of Florida properties in the Companys other real estate owned asset of $189,050, and (d) an
additional $263,878 of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations (FDIC) assessments in 2008. These
assessments are based on the Banks net assets and have increased substantially on an industry-wide
basis with the FDICs new assessment methodologies implemented in 2007.
Income Taxes
Applicable income tax expenses (benefits) totaled $(1,198,888) and $484,324 for the nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effective tax rates for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were 49.78% and 22.23%, respectively.
Applicable income tax (benefits) expenses totaled $266,622 and $(72,866) for the three-month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effective tax rates for the
three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were 23.85% and 79.78%, respectively. The
change in effective tax rates was primarily influenced by the level of tax-exempt interest income
earned in each period.
Financial Condition
Total assets of the Company grew $339,976,958 (29.92%) in the first nine months of 2008 to
$1,476,129,380 at September 30, 2008, from the level of $1,136,152,422 at December 31, 2007. This
growth resulted from the Companys continued
19
emphasis on increasing its market share of loans and deposits with its branch expansion program,
establishment of LPOs in the Houston and Phoenix markets, a strong capital base, and competitive
pricing of banking products.
Total deposits of the Company grew $261,957,774 (31.39%) in the first nine months of 2008 to
$1,096,534,223 at September 30, 2008, from the level of $834,576,449 at December 31, 2007. This
growth in deposits resulted from the Companys branch expansion program and competitive pricing on
deposit products.
Short-term borrowings at September 30, 2008 decreased $2,110,304 (2.39%) to $86,214,611 from the
level of $88,324,915 at December 31, 2007, with the increase in longer-term Federal Home Loan Bank
advances. Short-term borrowings will fluctuate significantly based on short-term liquidity needs
and certain seasonal deposit trends. Longer-term borrowings have increased significantly during
the first nine months of 2008. At September 30, 2008, total longer-term advances from the Federal
Home Loan Bank were $149,000,000, as compared with $68,000,000 at December 31, 2007. These
longer-term fixed rate advances were used as an alternative funding source to a competitive deposit
market. Due to the instability in the wholesale funding market, opportunity arose to take advantage
of a lower cost of funds in the wholesale market compared to retail deposits. The positive result
of this increase is reflected in the Companys improved net interest margin for the first nine
months of 2008; however, this has significantly tightened the Companys liquidity.
Total loans increased $313,205,844 (34.34%) in the first nine months of 2008 to $1,225,166,080 at
September 30, 2008, from the level of $911,960,236 at December 31, 2007. Company management has
emphasized the need to grow the loan portfolio to improve the Companys net interest margin,
without, however, sacrificing the quality of the Companys assets. This emphasis is supported by
the inclusion of a seasoned commercial lending officer at each of the Banks branches.
Investment securities, all of which are maintained as available-for-sale, increased $14,686,067
(8.97%) in the first nine months of 2008 to $178,331,285 at September 30, 2008, from the level of
$163,645,218 at December 31, 2007. The Companys investment portfolio growth is dependent upon the
level of deposit growth and the funding requirements of the Companys loan portfolio, as described
above. Rates offered on investment grade and low risk bonds have continued to remain very low in
the current economic market.
The capitalization of the Company has remained strong since its initial capitalization in 1998.
Total capital at September 30, 2008 was $136,559,582, which computes to a capital-to-asset
percentage of 9.25%. Since its inception, the Company has had 13 separate private placement
offerings of its Common Stock to accredited investors.
20
The following tables show the condensed average balance sheets for the periods reported and the
percentage of each principal category of assets, liabilities and stockholders equity to total
assets. Also shown is the average yield on each category of interest-earning assets and the average
rate paid on each category of interest-bearing liabilities for each of the periods reported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) (2) (3) |
|
$ |
1,070,366,888 |
|
|
|
81.48 |
% |
|
$ |
51,501,359 |
|
|
|
6.43 |
% |
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
136,085,251 |
|
|
|
10.36 |
|
|
|
4,806,351 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
|
Exempt from Federal income taxes (3) |
|
|
38,262,929 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
|
|
1,536,860 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
6,355,548 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
162,797 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
1,251,070,616 |
|
|
|
95.23 |
|
|
|
58,007,367 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonearning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
10,950,903 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for possible loan losses |
|
|
(11,406,428 |
) |
|
|
(0.87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
43,961,674 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
18,810,531 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investment market valuation |
|
|
314,438 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonearning assets |
|
|
62,631,118 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,313,701,734 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
|
$ |
165,207,045 |
|
|
|
12.58 |
% |
|
|
3,027,936 |
|
|
|
2.45 |
% |
Savings |
|
|
48,944,845 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
|
|
621,548 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
|
Time deposits of $100,000 or more |
|
|
334,052,847 |
|
|
|
25.43 |
|
|
|
10,440,040 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
363,564,437 |
|
|
|
27.67 |
|
|
|
11,604,872 |
|
|
|
4.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
911,769,174 |
|
|
|
69.41 |
|
|
|
25,694,396 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
120,302,920 |
|
|
|
9.16 |
|
|
|
3,463,592 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
|
Funds purchased and securities sold under
repurchase agreements |
|
|
81,577,258 |
|
|
|
6.21 |
|
|
|
1,680,996 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,113,649,352 |
|
|
|
84.78 |
|
|
|
30,838,984 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
55,075,699 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
5,684,111 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,174,409,162 |
|
|
|
89.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
139,292,572 |
|
|
|
10.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,313,701,734 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
27,168,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net yield on earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(continued)
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) (2) (3) |
|
$ |
736,408,179 |
|
|
|
75.22 |
% |
|
$ |
39,871,198 |
|
|
|
7.24 |
% |
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
145,699,487 |
|
|
|
14.88 |
|
|
|
5,222,663 |
|
|
|
4.79 |
|
Exempt from Federal income taxes (3) |
|
|
37,132,129 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
|
|
|
1,502,981 |
|
|
|
5.41 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
11,330,034 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
464,935 |
|
|
|
5.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
930,569,829 |
|
|
|
95.05 |
|
|
|
47,061,777 |
|
|
|
6.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonearning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
9,806,640 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for possible loan losses |
|
|
(7,411,018 |
) |
|
|
(0.76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
36,260,504 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
10,780,453 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investment market valuation |
|
|
(991,940 |
) |
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonearning assets |
|
|
48,444,639 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
979,014,468 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
|
$ |
154,148,693 |
|
|
|
15.74 |
% |
|
|
5,075,113 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
% |
Savings |
|
|
61,939,351 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
1,445,951 |
|
|
|
3.12 |
|
Time deposits of $100,000 or more |
|
|
223,509,035 |
|
|
|
22.83 |
|
|
|
8,478,971 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
283,195,864 |
|
|
|
28.93 |
|
|
|
9,884,785 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
722,792,943 |
|
|
|
73.83 |
|
|
|
24,884,820 |
|
|
|
4.60 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
31,489,377 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
|
1,057,913 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
|
Funds purchased and securities sold under
repurchase agreements |
|
|
42,884,853 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
1,605,876 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
797,167,173 |
|
|
|
81.43 |
|
|
|
27,548,609 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
43,199,115 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
6,243,834 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
846,610,122 |
|
|
|
86.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
132,404,346 |
|
|
|
13.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
979,014,468 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,513,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net yield on earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(continued)
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) (2) (3) |
|
$ |
1,191,904,958 |
|
|
|
82.24 |
% |
|
$ |
18,675,103 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
% |
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
144,600,823 |
|
|
|
9.98 |
|
|
|
1,636,351 |
|
|
|
4.50 |
|
Exempt from Federal income taxes (3) |
|
|
37,877,908 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
|
|
|
530,220 |
|
|
|
5.57 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
8,358,876 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
51,471 |
|
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
1,382,742,565 |
|
|
|
95.41 |
|
|
|
20,893,145 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonearning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
13,045,160 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for possible loan losses |
|
|
(13,092,284 |
) |
|
|
(0.90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
44,776,852 |
|
|
|
3.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
24,132,986 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investment market valuation |
|
|
(2,318,941 |
) |
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonearning assets |
|
|
66,543,773 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,449,286,338 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
|
$ |
161,183,261 |
|
|
|
11.12 |
% |
|
|
875,197 |
|
|
|
2.16 |
% |
Savings |
|
|
47,548,423 |
|
|
|
3.28 |
|
|
|
181,987 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
Time deposits of $100,000 or more |
|
|
375,945,922 |
|
|
|
25.94 |
|
|
|
3,488,393 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
429,763,468 |
|
|
|
29.65 |
|
|
|
4,117,346 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
1,014,441,074 |
|
|
|
69.99 |
|
|
|
8,662,923 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
145,021,740 |
|
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
|
1,375,939 |
|
|
|
3.77 |
|
Funds purchased and securities sold under
repurchase agreements |
|
|
89,676,651 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
|
|
|
571,906 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,249,139,465 |
|
|
|
86.19 |
|
|
|
10,610,768 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
58,414,574 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
5,012,265 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,312,566,304 |
|
|
|
90.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
136,720,034 |
|
|
|
9.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,449,286,338 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,282,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net yield on earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(continued)
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Income/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Rate |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) (2) (3) |
|
$ |
803,079,558 |
|
|
|
77.76 |
% |
|
$ |
14,454,674 |
|
|
|
7.14 |
% |
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
136,710,657 |
|
|
|
13.24 |
|
|
|
1,636,356 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
|
Exempt from Federal income taxes (3) |
|
|
38,543,387 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
|
|
472,241 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
1,869,221 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
34,568 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets |
|
|
980,202,823 |
|
|
|
94.92 |
|
|
|
16,597,839 |
|
|
|
6.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonearning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
10,721,633 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for possible loan losses |
|
|
(7,738,045 |
) |
|
|
(0.75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
40,360,578 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
10,841,953 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investment market valuation |
|
|
(1,684,677 |
) |
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonearning assets |
|
|
52,501,442 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,032,704,265 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
|
$ |
174,639,435 |
|
|
|
16.91 |
% |
|
|
1,926,818 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
% |
Savings |
|
|
59,654,478 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
|
|
|
439,850 |
|
|
|
2.93 |
|
Time deposits of $100,000 or more |
|
|
211,946,138 |
|
|
|
20.52 |
|
|
|
2,693,732 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
294,446,320 |
|
|
|
28.51 |
|
|
|
3,476,364 |
|
|
|
4.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
740,686,371 |
|
|
|
71.72 |
|
|
|
8,536,764 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
42,445,652 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
|
|
|
486,992 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
Funds purchased and securities sold under
repurchase agreements |
|
|
57,607,906 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
|
|
|
751,558 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
840,739,929 |
|
|
|
81.41 |
|
|
|
9,775,314 |
|
|
|
4.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
47,582,506 |
|
|
|
4.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
6,487,530 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
894,809,965 |
|
|
|
86.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
137,894,300 |
|
|
|
13.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,032,704,265 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,822,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net yield on earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest includes loan fees, recorded as discussed in Note 1 to our consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2007, included in our Form 10-K, which was filed
March 28, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Average balances include nonaccrual loans. The income on such loans is included in interest,
but is recognized only upon receipt. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest yields are presented on a tax-equivalent basis. Nontaxable income has been adjusted
upward by the amount of Federal income tax that would have been paid if the income had been
taxed at a rate of 34%, adjusted downward by the disallowance of the interest cost to carry
nontaxable loans and securities. |
Risk Management
Managements objective in structuring the balance sheet is to maximize the return on average assets
while minimizing the associated risks. The major risks concerning the Company are credit, liquidity
and interest rate risks. The following is a discussion concerning the Companys management of these
risks.
Credit Risk Management
24
Managing risks that the Companys banking subsidiaries assume in providing credit products to
customers is extremely important. Credit risk management includes defining an acceptable level of
risk and return, establishing appropriate polices and procedures to govern the credit process and
maintaining a thorough portfolio review process.
Of equal importance in the credit risk management process are the ongoing monitoring procedures
performed as part of the Companys loan review process. Credit policies are examined and procedures
reviewed for compliance each year. Loan personnel also continually monitor loans after disbursement
in an attempt to recognize any deterioration which may occur so that appropriate corrective action
can be initiated on a timely basis.
Prior to 2007, the Companys banking subsidiaries had incurred a minimal level of charge-offs, when
compared with the volume of loans generated; however, during 2007, the Banks net charge-offs
increased significantly, to $615,474, and have continued to increase in 2008. Net charge-offs for
the first nine months of 2008 were $5,825,054, compared to $615,474 for the first nine months of
2007. Net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2008 were $2,083,464, compared to $161,614 for the
third quarter of 2007. The Companys banking subsidiaries had no loans to any foreign countries at
September 30, 2008 and 2007, nor did they have any concentration of loans to any industry on these
dates, although a significant portion of the Companys loan portfolio is secured by real estate in
the St. Louis metropolitan and southwestern Florida areas. The Company has also refrained from
financing speculative transactions such as highly leveraged corporate buyouts, or
thinly-capitalized speculative start-up companies. Additionally, the Company had no other
interest-earning assets which were considered to be risk-element assets at September 30, 2008 and
2007.
In the normal course of business, the Companys practice is to consider and act upon borrowers
requests for renewal of loans at their maturity. Evaluation of such requests includes a review of
the borrowers credit history, the collateral securing the loan, and the purpose of such requests.
In general, loans which the Banks renew at maturity require payment of accrued interest, a
reduction in the loan balance, and/or the pledging of additional collateral and a potential
adjustment of the interest rate to reflect changes in economic conditions.
The softening of the real estate market in the St. Louis metropolitan and southwestern Florida
areas and the overall economic downturn have caused an increase in the Companys non-performing
assets of $16,482,521 (158.05%) to $26,911,521 at September 30, 2008 from $10,429,000 at September
30, 2007. At September 30, 2008 and 2007, nonperforming loans totaled $15,258,135 and $8,817,000,
respectively, comprised of nonaccrual loans of $14,595,718 and $8,414,000, respectively, and loans
90 days delinquent and still accruing interest of $662,417 and $403,000, respectively.
Nonperforming loans are defined as loans on non-accrual status, loans 90 days or more past due but
still accruing, and restructured loans. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when contractually
past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments, unless the loans are well secured
and in process of collection. Additionally, whenever management becomes aware of facts or
circumstances that may adversely impact the collectibility of principal or interest on loans, it is
managements practice to place such loans on non-accrual status immediately, rather than delaying
such action until the loans become 90 days past due. Previously accrued and uncollected interest on
such loans is reversed and income is recorded only to the extent that interest payments are
subsequently received in cash and a determination has been made that the principal balance of the
loan is collectible. If collectibility of the principal is in doubt, payments received are applied
to loan principal.
Loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing interest are also included in nonperforming
loans. Loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing interest are classified as such where the
underlying loans are both well secured (the collateral value is sufficient to cover principal and
accrued interest) and are in the process of collection. Also included in nonperforming loans are
restructured loans. Restructured loans involve the granting of some concession to the borrower
involving the modification of terms of the loan, such as changes in payment schedule or interest
rate.
At September 30, 2008, nonperforming loans have actually decreased $2,489,475 to $15,258,135, from
$17,747,610 at December 31, 2007, the largest components of which were primarily comprised of the
following loan relationships:
|
|
|
Loans totaling approximately $5.6 million to entities controlled by a Florida real estate
investor that were in default and for which foreclosure proceedings have commenced. These
loans are secured by commercial real estate properties in southwestern Florida for which the
values have continued to decline. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company wrote
down these loans to liquidation value by charging the reserve for possible loan losses in the
amount of $2,403,173 and transferring $3,108,000 to other real estate owned. During |
25
|
|
|
the quarter ended September 30, 2008 the one remaining property with a value of $232,000 was
transferred to other real estate owned. |
|
|
|
|
Approximately $1.7 million of loans categorized as restructured debt were carried as
nonperforming loans during the quarter ended June 30, 2008. These loans are collateralized by
three single family residences located in southwestern Florida. During the quarter ended June
30, 2008, the Company wrote down the value of these loans to 90% of appraised value by
charging the reserve for possible loan losses in the amount of $560,908, based on current
appraisals of the properties. The Company is working with the borrower to move these
properties as quickly as possible. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Company
entered into a forbearance agreement with the borrowers of these properties and transferred
$1.2 million to other real estate owned. |
|
|
|
|
A loan totaling $6.4 million representing a participation purchased is in the process of
foreclosure. The loan is collateralized by a construction condominium development in
southwestern Florida. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the company wrote down the
value of this loan by charging $1,546,372 to the reserve for possible loan losses. Based on
an internal review of the costs and status of the development, the Company has allocated an
additional $232,000 of the reserve for possible loan losses for this loan relationship; which
represents approximately thirty percent of the principal balance. |
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company accepted a deed in lieu of foreclosure
from a southwestern Florida home builder to settle loans outstanding. As part of this
transaction, $667,000 was transferred to other real estate owned and a charge-off to the
reserve for loan losses was taken in the amount of $211,000. Property transferred to other
real estate owned included three single family residences and eight residential lots, all
located in southwestern Florida. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company wrote
down the value of these properties to 90% of appraised value resulting in an $189,050 charge
to operations. |
The Company also has nonperforming assets in the form of other real estate owned. The Banks
maintained other real estate owned totaling $11,653,385 and $1,612,000 at September 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively. Other real estate owned represents property acquired through foreclosure, or
deeded to the Banks in lieu of foreclosure for loans on which borrowers have defaulted as to
payment of principal and interest.
During this period of a softening real estate market, the Company has sought to add loans to its
portfolio with increased collateral margins or excess payment capacity from proven borrowers, and
has often had to offer a lower interest rate on such loans to maintain the quality of the loan
portfolio. Given the collateral margins maintained on its loan portfolio, including the
nonperforming loans discussed above, the Company believes the reserve for possible loan losses is
adequate to absorb losses in the portfolio existing at September 30, 2008; however, should the real
estate market continue to soften, the Company may require additional provisions to the reserve for
possible loan losses to address the declining collateral values.
Potential Problem Loans
As of September 30, 2008, the Company had 18 loans with a total principal balance of $26,416,457
that were identified by management as having possible credit problems that raise doubts as to the
ability of the borrower to comply with the current repayment terms. These loans were continuing to
accrue interest and were less than 90 days past due on any scheduled payments. However, various
concerns, including, but not limited to, payment history, loan agreement compliance, adequacy of
collateral coverage, and borrowers overall financial condition caused management to believe that
these loans may result in reclassification at some future time as nonaccrual, past due or
restructured. Such loans are not necessarily indicative of future nonaccrual loans, as the Company
continues to work on resolving issues with both nonperforming and potential problem credits on its
watch list.
The Companys credit management policies and procedures focus on identifying, measuring, and
controlling credit exposure. These procedures employ a lender-initiated system of rating credits,
which is ratified in the loan approval process and subsequently tested in internal loan review and
regulatory bank examinations. The system requires rating all loans at the time they are made, at
each renewal date and as conditions warrant.
26
Adversely rated credits, including loans requiring close monitoring, which may not be considered
criticized credits by regulators, are included on a monthly loan watch list. Other loans are added
whenever any adverse circumstances are detected which might affect the borrowers ability to meet
the terms of the loan. This could be initiated by any of the following:
|
|
|
Delinquency of a scheduled loan payment; |
|
|
|
|
Deterioration in the borrowers financial condition identified in a review of periodic
financial statements; |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in the value of collateral securing the loan; or |
|
|
|
|
Change in the economic environment in which the borrower operates. |
Loans on the watch list require periodic detailed loan status reports, including recommended
corrective actions, prepared by the responsible loan officer, which are discussed at each monthly
loan committee meeting.
Downgrades of loan risk ratings may be initiated by the responsible loan officer, internal loan
review, the Loan Committee, or senior lending personnel at any time. Upgrades of certain risk
ratings may only be made with the concurrence of the Watch List Committee of the Board of
Directors.
The Companys loan underwriting policies limit individual loan officers to specific amounts of
lending authority, over which various committees must get involved and approve a credit. The
Companys underwriting policies require an analysis of a borrowers ability to pay the loan and
interest on a timely basis in accordance with the loan agreement. Collateral is then considered as
a secondary source of payment, should the borrower not be able to pay.
The Company conducts weekly loan committee meetings of all of its loan officers, including the
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Lending Officer, and Chief Credit Officer. This committee may
approve individual credit relationships up to $2,500,000. Larger credits must go to the Loan
Committee of the Board of Directors, which is comprised of three Directors on a rotating basis.
The Companys legal lending limit was $36,024,884 at September 30, 2008.
At September 30, 2008 and 2007, the reserve for possible loan losses was $12,398,957 and
$8,890,557, respectively, or 1.01% and 1.06% of net outstanding loans, respectively. The following
table summarizes the Companys loan loss experience for the nine-month periods ended September 30,
2008 and 2007. Bank management believes that the diligent underwriting process implemented at the
Companys inception and consistently applied throughout the Companys existence will allow for
continued maintenance of adequate asset quality; however, the continued softening of the real
estate market, particularly in Florida, has continued to challenge the Company.
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month Periods |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Average loans outstanding |
|
$ |
1,070,367 |
|
|
$ |
736,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve at beginning of year |
|
$ |
9,685 |
|
|
$ |
7,101 |
|
Provision for possible loan losses |
|
|
8,539 |
|
|
|
2,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,224 |
|
|
|
9,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
|
(2,710 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
(1,758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
|
|
(280 |
) |
Consumer |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Overdrafts |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
(5,846 |
) |
|
|
(658 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Overdrafts |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve at end of period |
|
$ |
12,399 |
|
|
$ |
8,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average loans |
|
|
0.54 |
% |
|
|
0.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
reserve to net outstanding loans at end of period |
|
|
1.01 |
% |
|
|
1.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged off are subject to continuous review, and specific efforts are taken to achieve
maximum recovery of principal, accrued interest, and related expenses.
In determining the reserve and the related provision for loan losses, three principal elements are
considered:
|
|
|
Specific allocations based upon probable losses identified during a quarterly review of the
loan portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
Allocations based principally on the Companys risk rating formulas; and |
|
|
|
|
An unallocated allowance based on subjective factors. |
The first element reflects managements estimate of probable losses based upon a systematic review
of specific loans considered to be impaired. These estimates are based upon collateral exposure,
using current fair values of collateral.
The second element reflects the application of our loan rating system. This rating system is
similar to those employed by state and Federal banking regulators. Loans are rated and assigned a
loss allocation factor for each category that is consistent with historical losses normally
experienced in our banking market, adjusted for environmental factors and the Banks own historical
experience (which until recently has been limited). The higher the rating assigned to a loan, the
greater the allocation percentage that is applied.
The unallocated allowance is based on managements evaluation of conditions that are not directly
reflected in the determination of the formula and specific allowances. The evaluation of the
inherent loss with respect to these
28
conditions is subject to a higher degree of uncertainty because they may not be identified with
specific problem credits or portfolio segments. The conditions evaluated in connection with the
unallocated allowance include the following:
|
|
|
General economic and business conditions affecting our key lending areas; |
|
|
|
|
Credit quality trends (including trends in nonperforming loans expected to result from
existing conditions); |
|
|
|
|
Collateral values; |
|
|
|
|
Loan volumes and concentrations; |
|
|
|
|
Competitive factors resulting in shifts in underwriting criteria; |
|
|
|
|
Specific industry conditions within portfolio segments; |
|
|
|
|
Recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
Bank regulatory examination results; and |
|
|
|
|
Findings of our internal loan review department. |
Executive management reviews these conditions quarterly in discussion with our entire lending
staff. To the extent that any of these conditions is evidenced by a specifically identifiable
problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, managements estimate of the effect
of such conditions may be reflected as a specific reserve allocation, applicable to such credit or
portfolio segment. Where any of these conditions is not evidenced by a specifically identifiable
problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, managements evaluation of the
probable loss related to such condition is reflected in the unallocated allowance.
Based on this quantitative and qualitative analysis, provisions are made to the reserve for
possible loan losses. Such provisions are reflected in our consolidated statements of income.
The allocation of the reserve for possible loan losses by loan category is a result of the above
analysis. The allocation methodology applied by the Company, designed to assess the adequacy of
the reserve for possible loan losses, focuses on changes in the size and character of the loan
portfolio, changes in levels of impaired and other nonperforming loans, the risk inherent in
specific loans, concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries, existing economic
conditions, and historical losses normally experienced in our banking market for each portfolio
category. Because each of the criteria used is subject to change, the allocation of the reserve for
possible loan losses is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the trend
of future loan losses in any particular loan category.
The total reserve for possible loan losses is available to absorb losses from any segment of the
portfolio. Management continues to target and maintain the reserve for possible loan losses equal
to the allocation methodology plus an unallocated portion, as determined by economic conditions and
other qualitative and quantitative factors affecting the Companys borrowers, as described above.
In determining an adequate balance in the reserve for possible loan losses, management places its
emphasis as follows: evaluation of the loan portfolio with regard to potential future exposure on
loans to specific customers and industries; reevaluation of each watch list loan or loan classified
by supervisory authorities; and an overall review of the remaining portfolio in light of loan loss
experience normally experienced in our banking market. Any problems or loss exposure estimated in
these categories is provided for in the total current period reserve.
Management views the reserve for possible loan losses as being available for all potential or
presently unidentifiable loan losses which may occur in the future. The risk of future losses that
is inherent in the loan portfolio is not precisely attributable to a particular loan or category of
loans.
The perception of risk with respect to particular loans within the portfolio will change over time
as a result of the characteristics and performance of those loans, overall economic and market
trends, and the actual and expected trends in nonperforming loans. Consequently, while there are no
specific allocations of the reserve resulting from
29
economic or market conditions or actual or expected trends in nonperforming loans, these factors
are considered in the initial assignment of risk ratings to loans, subsequent changes to those risk
ratings and to a lesser extent in the size of the unallocated allowance amount.
The Company has been in existence since 1999 and, while significant loan growth has been achieved,
the Company has not yet been around long enough to have a sufficient historical base of charge-off
data to fine-tune the unallocated reserve estimate. Accordingly, the Company has used benchmarks
from other similar institutions. The unallocated reserve is based on factors that cannot
necessarily be associated with a specific loan or loan category. Management focuses on the
following factors and conditions:
|
|
|
There is a level of imprecision necessarily inherent in the estimates of expected loan
losses, and the unallocated reserve gives reasonable assurance that this level of imprecision
in our formula methodologies is adequately provided for. |
|
|
|
|
Pressures to maintain and grow the loan portfolio with increasing competition from de novo
institutions and larger competitors have to some degree affected credit granting criteria
adversely. The Company monitors the disposition of all credits, which have been approved
through its Executive Loan Committee in order to better understand competitive shifts in
underwriting criteria. |
While the Company has no significant specific industry concentration risk, analysis showed that
over 90% of the loan portfolio was dependent on real estate collateral at September 30, 2008,
including commercial real estate, residential real estate, and construction and land development
loans. The Company has policies, guidelines, and individual risk ratings in place to control this
exposure at the transaction level; however, given the volatile nature of interest rates and their
affect on the real estate market and the likely adverse impacts on borrowers debt service coverage
ratios, management believes it is prudent to maintain an unallocated allowance component.
Additionally, the Company continues to be committed to a strategy of acquiring relationships with
larger commercial and industrial companies. Management believed it was prudent to increase the
percentage of the unallocated reserve to cover the risks inherent in the higher average loan size
of these relationships.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is a measurement of the Banks ability to meet the borrowing needs and the deposit
withdrawal requirements of their customers. The composition of assets and liabilities is actively
managed to maintain the appropriate level of liquidity in the balance sheet. Management is guided
by regularly-reviewed policies when determining the appropriate portion of total assets which
should be comprised of readily-marketable assets available to meet conditions that are reasonably
expected to occur.
Liquidity is primarily provided to the Banks through earning assets, including Federal funds sold
and maturities and principal payments in the investment portfolio, all funded through continued
deposit growth and short-term borrowings. Secondary sources of liquidity available to the Banks
include the sale of securities included in the available-for-sale category (with a carrying value
of $178,331,285 at September 30, 2008, of which approximately $134,097,094 is pledged to secure
deposits and repurchase agreements) and borrowing capabilities through correspondent banks and the
Federal Home Loan Banks. Maturing loans also provide liquidity on an ongoing basis. Accordingly,
Bank management believes it has the liquidity necessary to meet unexpected deposit withdrawal
requirements or increases in loan demand.
The Federal Reserve Board established risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies,
which require bank holding companies to maintain minimum levels of Tier 1 Capital and Total
Capital. Tier 1 Capital consists of common and qualifying preferred stockholders equity and
minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill and 50% of
investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries. Total capital consists of, in addition to Tier 1
Capital, mandatory convertible debt, preferred stock not qualifying as Tier 1 Capital, subordinated
and other qualifying term debt and a portion of the reserve for possible loan losses, less the
remaining 50% of qualifying total capital. Risk-based capital ratios are calculated with reference
to risk-weighted assets, which include both on-and off-balance sheet exposures. The minimum
required ratio for qualifying Total Capital is 8%, of which at least 4% must consist of Tier 1
Capital.
30
In addition, Federal Reserve guidelines require bank holding companies to maintain a minimum ratio
of Tier 1 Capital to average total assets (net of goodwill) of 3%. The Federal Reserve guidelines
state that all of these capital ratios constitute the minimum requirements for the most
highly-rated banking organizations, and other banking organizations are expected to maintain
capital at higher levels.
As of September 30, 2008, the Company and Banks were each in compliance with the Tier 1 Capital
ratio requirement and all other applicable regulatory capital requirements, as calculated in
accordance with risk-based capital guidelines. The actual capital amounts and ratios for the
Company, Reliance Bank, and Reliance Bank, FSB at September 30, 2008 are presented in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be a Well |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized Bank Under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
Prompt Corrective |
|
|
Actual |
|
Adequacy Purposes |
|
Action Provision |
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
149,410 |
|
|
|
10.75 |
% |
|
$ |
111,239 |
|
|
|
³8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance Bank |
|
|
129,975 |
|
|
|
10.06 |
% |
|
|
103,365 |
|
|
|
³8.0 |
% |
|
|
129,207 |
|
|
|
³10.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance Bank, FSB |
|
|
23,256 |
|
|
|
24.03 |
% |
|
|
7,742 |
|
|
|
³8.0 |
% |
|
|
9,678 |
|
|
|
³10.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
137,011 |
|
|
|
9.85 |
% |
|
$ |
55,620 |
|
|
|
³4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance Bank |
|
|
118,675 |
|
|
|
9.18 |
% |
|
|
51,683 |
|
|
|
³4.0 |
% |
|
|
77,524 |
|
|
|
³6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance Bank, FSB |
|
|
22,443 |
|
|
|
23.19 |
% |
|
|
3,871 |
|
|
|
³4.0 |
% |
|
|
5,807 |
|
|
|
³6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
137,011 |
|
|
|
9.44 |
% |
|
$ |
58,079 |
|
|
|
³4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance Bank |
|
|
118,675 |
|
|
|
8.78 |
% |
|
|
54,097 |
|
|
|
³4.0 |
% |
|
|
67,621 |
|
|
|
³5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance Bank, FSB |
|
|
22,443 |
|
|
|
20.06 |
% |
|
|
4,409 |
|
|
|
³4.0 |
% |
|
|
5,511 |
|
|
|
³5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal law provides the federal banking regulators with broad power to take prompt corrective
action to resolve the problems of undercapitalized banking institutions. The extent of the
regulators powers depend on whether the banking institution in question is well capitalized,
adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized or critically
undercapitalized, which are defined by the regulators as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Tier 1 |
|
Tier 1 |
|
|
Risk-Based |
|
Risk-Based |
|
Leverage |
|
|
Ratio |
|
Ratio |
|
Ratio |
Well capitalized |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Adequately capitalized |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Undercapitalized |
|
|
<8 |
|
|
|
<4 |
|
|
|
<4 |
|
Significantly undercapitalized |
|
|
<6 |
|
|
|
<3 |
|
|
|
<3 |
|
Critically undercapitalized |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
A critically undercapitalized institution is defined as having a tangible equity to total
assets ratio of 2% or less. |
Depending upon the capital category to which an institution is assigned, the regulators corrective
powers include: requiring the submission of a capital restoration plan; placing limits on asset
growth and restrictions on activities; requiring the institution to issue additional capital stock
(including additional voting stock) or to be acquired; restricting transactions with affiliates;
restricting the interest rate the institution may pay on deposits; ordering a new election of
directors of the institution; requiring that senior executive officers or directors be dismissed;
prohibiting the institution from accepting deposits from correspondent banks; requiring the
institution to divest certain subsidiaries; prohibiting the payment of principal or interest on
subordinated debt; and ultimately, appointing a receiver of the institution. The capital category
of an institution also determines in part the amount of the premium assessed against the
institution for FDIC insurance. At September 30, 2008, Reliance Bank and Reliance Bank, FSB were
considered well capitalized.
Contractual Obligations, Off-Balance Sheet Risk, and Contingent Liabilities
Through the normal course of operations, the Banks have entered into certain contractual
obligations and other commitments. Such obligations relate to funding of operations through
deposits or debt issuances, as well as leases for
31
premises and equipment. As financial services providers, the Banks routinely enter into commitments
to extend credit. While contractual obligations represent future cash requirements of the Banks, a
significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such
commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval processes accorded to loans made
by the Banks.
The required contractual obligations and other commitments at September 30, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over 1 Year |
|
|
|
|
Total Cash |
|
Less Than 1 |
|
Less Than 5 |
|
Over 5 |
|
|
Commitment |
|
Year |
|
Years |
|
Years |
Operating leases |
|
$ |
6,732,964 |
|
|
$ |
152,687 |
|
|
$ |
2,369,369 |
|
|
$ |
4,210,908 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
834,548,844 |
|
|
|
609,662,277 |
|
|
|
194,632,525 |
|
|
|
30,254,042 |
|
Federal Home
Loan Bank borrowings |
|
|
149,000,000 |
|
|
|
19,000,000 |
|
|
|
60,000,000 |
|
|
|
70,000,000 |
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
|
288,866,860 |
|
|
|
106,272,766 |
|
|
|
104,354,362 |
|
|
|
78,239,732 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
23,174,333 |
|
|
|
14,983,086 |
|
|
|
7,891,247 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Accounting Pronouncements
Several accounting rule changes that will or have gone into effect recently, as promulgated by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB), will have an effect on the Companys financial
reporting process. These accounting rule changes, issued in the form of Financial Accounting
Standards (FAS) or Interpretations include the following:
|
|
|
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, an Interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes in financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement
attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48
became effective and was implemented in 2007 by the Company; however, Company management
believes that the Company maintains no uncertain tax positions for tax reporting purposes and
accordingly, no FIN 48 liability is required to be recorded. |
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS No. 157). FAS
No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting standards, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS No.
157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FAS No. 157. In accordance with the
FASB Staff Position 157-2, Effective Date of SFAS No. 157, the Company has not applied the
provisions of FAS No. 157 to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities such as other
real estate owned and goodwill. The Company uses fair value measurements to determine fair
value disclosures. The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets
recorded at fair value: |
Investments in Available-For-Sale Debt Securities - Investments in available-for-sale debt
securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Companys available-for sale debt
securities are measured at fair value using Level 2 valuations. The market evaluation utilizes
several sources which include observable inputs rather than significant unobservable inputs and,
therefore, fall into the Level 2 category. The table below presents the balances of available-for
sale debt securities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies
and corporations |
|
$ |
66,847,242 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
33,615,128 |
|
Other debt securities |
|
|
4,831,760 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
62,488,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
167,782,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans - The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis other than loans that
are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as impaired, management measures impairment in
accordance with Statement of FAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. At
September 30, 2008, all impaired loans were evaluated
based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the collateral is based upon an
observable market price or current appraised value, and, therefore, the Company classifies these
assets in the nonrecurring Level 2 category. The total principal balance of impaired loans
measured at fair value at September 30, 2008 was $15,258,135.
32
Part I Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Management of rate sensitive earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities remains a key to the
Companys profitability. The Companys operations are subject to risk resulting from interest rate
fluctuations to the extent that there is a difference between the amount of the Companys
interest-earning assets and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities that are prepaid or
withdrawn, mature or are repriced in specified periods. The principal objective of the Companys
asset/liability management activities is to provide maximum levels of net interest income while
maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate and liquidity risk and facilitating the funding
needs of the Company. The Banks utilize gap analyses as the primary quantitative tool in measuring
the amount of interest rate risk that is present at the end of each quarter. Reliance Bank
management also monitors, on a quarterly basis the variability of earnings and fair value of equity
in various interest rate environments. Bank management evaluates the Banks risk position to
determine whether the level of exposure is significant enough to hedge a potential decline in
earnings and value or whether the Banks can safely increase risk to enhance returns.
The asset/liability management process, which involves structuring the balance sheet to allow
approximately equal amounts of assets and liabilities to reprice at the same time, is a dynamic
process essential to minimize the effect of fluctuating interest rates on net interest income. The
following table reflects the Companys interest rate gap (rate-sensitive assets minus
rate-sensitive liabilities) analysis as of September 30, 2008, individually and cumulatively,
through various time horizons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Maturity if Fixed Rate; |
|
|
|
Earliest Possible Repricing Interval if Floating Rate |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Over 3 |
|
|
Over 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
months |
|
|
months |
|
|
year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or |
|
|
through |
|
|
through |
|
|
Over |
|
|
|
|
|
|
less |
|
|
12 months |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
Total |
|
Interest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
422,578,720 |
|
|
$ |
118,042,538 |
|
|
$ |
611,326,331 |
|
|
$ |
73,218,491 |
|
|
$ |
1,225,166,080 |
|
Investment securities, at amortized cost |
|
|
24,422,227 |
|
|
|
42,294,394 |
|
|
|
90,747,565 |
|
|
|
23,529,911 |
|
|
|
180,994,097 |
|
Other interest-earning assets |
|
|
2,041,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,041,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
449,042,814 |
|
|
$ |
160,336,932 |
|
|
$ |
702,073,896 |
|
|
$ |
96,748,402 |
|
|
$ |
1,408,202,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing-liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and interest bearing transaction accounts |
|
$ |
207,571,700 |
|
|
$ |
11,838 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
207,583,538 |
|
Time certificates of deposit of $100,00 or more |
|
|
129,860,277 |
|
|
|
182,432,236 |
|
|
|
61,277,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,570,438 |
|
All other time deposits |
|
|
94,674,907 |
|
|
|
202,694,857 |
|
|
|
133,354,600 |
|
|
|
30,254,042 |
|
|
|
460,978,406 |
|
Nondeposit interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
80,560,040 |
|
|
|
24,654,571 |
|
|
|
60,000,000 |
|
|
|
70,000,000 |
|
|
|
235,214,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
512,666,924 |
|
|
$ |
409,793,502 |
|
|
$ |
254,632,525 |
|
|
$ |
100,254,042 |
|
|
$ |
1,277,346,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gap by period |
|
$ |
(63,624,110 |
) |
|
$ |
(249,456,570 |
) |
|
$ |
447,441,371 |
|
|
$ |
(3,505,640 |
) |
|
$ |
130,855,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative gap |
|
$ |
(63,624,110 |
) |
|
$ |
(313,080,680 |
) |
|
$ |
134,360,691 |
|
|
$ |
130,855,051 |
|
|
$ |
130,855,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of interest-sensitive assets to interest-
sensitive liabilities |
|
|
0.88 |
x |
|
|
0.39 |
x |
|
|
2.76 |
x |
|
|
0.97 |
x |
|
|
1.10 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative ratio of interest-sensitive assets to
interest-sensitive liabilities |
|
|
0.88 |
x |
|
|
0.66 |
x |
|
|
1.11 |
x |
|
|
1.10 |
x |
|
|
1.10 |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A gap report is used by Bank management to review any significant mismatch between the repricing
points of the Banks rate sensitive assets and liabilities in certain time horizons. A negative gap
indicates that more liabilities reprice in that particular time frame and, if rates rise, these
liabilities will reprice faster than the assets. A positive gap would indicate the opposite.
Management has set policy limits specifying acceptable levels of interest rate risk as measured by
the gap report. Gap reports can be misleading in that they capture only the repricing timing within
the balance sheet, and fail to capture other significant risks such as basis risk and embedded
options risk. Basis risk involves the potential for the spread relationship between rates to change
under different rate environments and embedded options risk relates to the potential for the
alteration of the level and/or timing of cash flows given changes in rates. As indicated in the
above table, the Company operates on a short-term basis similar to most other financial
institutions, as its liabilities, with savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts included,
could reprice more quickly than its assets. However, the process of asset/liability management in a
financial institution is dynamic. Bank management believes its current asset/liability management
program will allow adequate reaction time for trends in the marketplace as they occur, allowing
maintenance of adequate net interest margins.
Bank management also uses fair market value of equity analyses to help identify longer-term risk
that may reside on the current balance sheet. The fair market value of equity is represented by the
present value of all future income streams generated by the current balance sheet. The Company
measures the fair market value of equity as the net present value of all asset and liability cash
flows discounted at forward rates suggested by the current Treasury curve plus appropriate credit
spreads. This representation of the change in the fair market value of equity under different rate
scenarios gives insight into the magnitude of risk to future earnings due to rate
changes. Management has set policy limits relating to declines in the market value of equity. The
results of these analyses at September 30, 2008 indicate that the Companys fair market value of
equity would decrease 4.1%, 3.9%, and 1.8%, from an immediate and sustained parallel decrease in
interest rates of 100, 200, and 300 basis points, respectively, and decrease 5.6%, 12.0%, and
18.6%, from a corresponding increase in interest rates of 100, 200, and 300 basis points,
respectively.
33
Part I Item 4T Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and concluded
that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective as of September
30, 2008.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
34
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Part II Item 1 Legal Proceedings
The Company and its subsidiaries are, from time to time, parties to various legal proceedings
arising out of their businesses. Management believes that there are no such proceedings pending or
threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries which, if determined adversely, would have a
material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows
of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
Part II Item 1A Risk Factors
Other than the additional disclosure below, there have not been any material changes in the risk
factors as disclosed in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Our wholesale funding sources may prove insufficient to replace deposits at maturity and support
our future growth.
Liquidity is essential to the Companys business. Our liquidity could be impaired by
unforeseen outflows of cash that may arise due to circumstances that we may be unable to control,
such as general market disruption or an operational problem that affects third parties or us. The
Company must maintain sufficient funds to respond to the needs of depositors and borrowers. As
part of our liquidity management, we use a number of funding sources in addition to deposit growth
and repayments and maturities of loans and investments. These funding sources include Federal Home
Loan Bank borrowings, proceeds from the sale of loans, brokered certificates of deposit and secured
lines of credit from other financial institutions and the Federal Reserve Bank. If we were to
become less than well capitalized, as defined by applicable federal regulations, it would
materially restrict our ability to acquire and retain brokered certificates of deposit.
Additionally, adverse operating results or changes in industry conditions could lead to difficulty
or inability to access these additional funding sources. Our financial flexibility will be
severely constrained if we are unable to maintain our access to funding or if adequate financing is
not available to accommodate future growth at acceptable interest rates. Finally, if we are
required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to support future growth, our
revenues may not increase proportionately to cover our costs. In this case, our operating margins
and profitability would be adversely affected.
35
Part II Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
From July 1, 2008 through September 30, 2008, we issued the following 2,296 shares of our Class A
Common Stock upon the exercise of options to purchase such Common Stock granted to certain
executive and non-executive employees under various stock option plans and exempt from registration
pursuant to Rule 505 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Act).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares Issued |
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
Upon Exercise |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Proceeds |
August 11, 2008 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
The table below contains information regarding the grant of stock options to purchase the Companys
Common Stock to directors, officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, generally
pursuant to the Companys Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plans during the quarter ended
September 30, 2008. The grants of such stock and options were exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 505 promulgated under the Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
|
Date Exercisable/ |
|
|
Date |
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Vested |
|
Expiration Date |
August 5, 2008 |
|
10,000 Incentive |
|
$7.50 |
|
August 5, 2009-1,667; |
|
November 16, 2015 |
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
|
August 5, 2010-3,334; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2011-3,333; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2012-1,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2008 |
|
500 Non-Qualified |
|
$9.05 |
|
September 16,2009-250; |
|
November 16, 2015 |
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
|
September 16, 2010-250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2008 |
|
5,000 Incentive |
|
$8.30 |
|
Sept. 16, 2009-1,667; |
|
November 16, 2015 |
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
|
Sept. 16, 2010-1,667; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept. 16, 2011-1,666 |
|
|
On July 1, 2008, the Company sold 5,206 shares of our Common Stock to officers and employees of the
Company and our subsidiaries pursuant to our Employee Stock Purchase Plan pursuant to Rule 505
under the Act. Shares were sold at $5.95 per share, which was 85% of the closing sales price on
June 30, 2008, totalling $30,976 in proceeds.
On August 5, 2008, the Company awarded 2,500 shares of our Common Stock to an employee in
accordance with the employees initial employment arrangement pursuant to Rule 505 under the Act.
The shares are subject to time vesting according to the following schedule: 1,000 shares vested on
August 5, 2009 and 750 shares to vest on each of August 5, 2010 and 2011.
36
Part II Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Part II Item 4 Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders
None.
Part II Item 5 Other Information
(b) |
|
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend
nominees to the Companys Board of Directors implemented since the filing of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. |
Part II Item 6 Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
31.1
|
|
Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to Rules
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to Rules
13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Jerry S. Von Rohr
|
|
|
|
Jerry S. Von Rohr |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Dale E. Oberkfell
|
|
|
|
Dale E. Oberkfell |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date: November 7, 2008
37