e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
     
o   Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number: 000-52588
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
     
Missouri   43-1823071
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
     
10401 Clayton Road
Frontenac, Missouri

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
  63131
(Zip Code)
(314) 569-7200
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
     Large accelerated filer o    Accelerated filer o    Non-accelerated filer   þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No þ
As of October 31, 2008, the Registrant had 20,770,781 shares of outstanding Class A common stock, $0.25 par value.
 
 

 


 

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    Page
    1  
    1  
    1  
    2  
    3  
    4  
    5  
    6  
    12  
    33  
    34  
    35  
    35  
    35  
    36  
    37  
    37  
    37  
    37  
    37  
 EXHIBIT 31.1
 EXHIBIT 31.2
 EXHIBIT 32.1
 EXHIBIT 32.2

 


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Part I — Item 1 — Financial Statements
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
September 30, 2008 and 2007 and December 31, 2007
                         
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007     2007  
ASSETS
                       
Cash and due from banks
  $ 12,717,479       10,836,678       13,170,564  
Interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions
    2,041,867       98,598       89,876  
Federal funds sold
          39,000       30,000  
Investments in available-for-sale debt and equity securities, at fair value
    178,331,285       172,829,382       163,645,218  
Loans
    1,225,166,080       839,091,832       911,960,236  
Less - Deferred loan fees/costs
    (893,553 )     (269,909 )     (222,226 )
Reserve for possible loan losses
    (12,398,957 )     (8,890,557 )     (9,685,011 )
 
                 
Net loans
    1,211,873,570       829,931,366       902,052,999  
 
                 
Premises and equipment, net
    44,491,084       41,032,014       42,931,925  
Accrued interest receivable
    5,442,661       5,179,664       4,959,629  
Identifiable intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $86,869, $70,581 and $74,653 at September 30, 2008 and 2007, and December 31, 2007, respectively
    157,450       173,738       169,666  
Goodwill
    1,149,192       1,149,192       1,149,192  
Other real estate
    11,653,385       1,612,286       4,937,285  
Other assets
    8,271,407       3,137,029       3,016,068  
 
                 
 
  $ 1,476,129,380       1,066,018,947       1,136,152,422  
 
                 
 
                       
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                       
Deposits:
                       
Non-interest-bearing
  $ 54,401,841       46,139,342       53,441,589  
Interest-bearing
    1,042,132,382       753,325,445       781,134,860  
 
                 
Total deposits
    1,096,534,223       799,464,787       834,576,449  
Short-term borrowings
    86,214,611       72,320,906       88,324,915  
Notes payable to Federal Home Loan Bank
    149,000,000       50,000,000       68,000,000  
Accrued interest payable
    4,239,781       3,122,877       3,656,113  
Other liabilities
    3,581,183       2,451,928       1,703,972  
 
                 
Total liabilities
    1,339,569,798       927,360,498       996,261,449  
 
                 
Commitments and contingencies
                       
Stockholders’ equity:
                       
Preferred stock, no par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized
                 
Common stock, $0.25 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized, 20,770,781, 20,660,116, and 20,682,075 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2008 and 2007, and December 31, 2007, respectively
    5,192,695       5,165,029       5,170,519  
Surplus
    124,315,888       123,258,544       123,329,517  
Retained earnings
    9,772,943       10,561,804       10,982,306  
Treasury stock, at cost - 76,948 and 9,396 shares at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively
    (964,488 )     (112,752 )      
Accumulated other comprehensive income — net unrealized holding (losses) gains on available-for-sale debt securities
    (1,757,456 )     (214,176 )     408,631  
 
                 
Total stockholders’ equity
    136,559,582       138,658,449       139,890,973  
 
                 
 
  $ 1,476,129,380       1,066,018,947       1,136,152,422  
 
                 
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

1


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
Interest income:
                               
Interest and fees on loans
  $ 18,669,323       14,451,420       51,484,539       39,854,890  
Interest and dividends on debt and equity securities:
                               
Taxable
    1,636,351       1,636,356       4,806,351       5,222,663  
Exempt from Federal income taxes
    387,887       392,948       1,176,754       1,135,724  
Interest on short-term investments
    51,471       34,568       162,797       464,935  
 
                       
Total interest income
    20,745,032       16,515,292       57,630,441       46,678,212  
 
                       
Interest expense:
                               
Interest on deposits
    8,662,923       8,536,764       25,694,396       24,884,820  
Interest on short-term borrowings
    571,906       751,558       1,680,996       1,605,876  
Interest on notes payable to Federal Home Loan Bank
    1,375,939       486,992       3,463,592       1,057,913  
 
                       
Total interest expense
    10,610,768       9,775,314       30,838,984       27,548,609  
 
                       
Net interest income
    10,134,264       6,739,978       26,791,457       19,129,603  
Provision for possible loan losses
    1,800,000       1,515,000       8,539,000       2,405,000  
 
                       
Net interest income after provision for possible loan losses
    8,334,264       5,224,978       18,252,457       16,724,603  
 
                       
Noninterest income:
                               
Service charges on deposit accounts
    209,682       120,743       582,678       361,826  
Net gains (losses) on sale of debt and equity securities
    117             312,250       (7,026 )
Other noninterest income
    374,521       292,871       1,095,250       921,536  
 
                       
Total noninterest income
    584,320       413,614       1,990,178       1,276,336  
 
                       
Noninterest expense:
                               
Salaries and employee benefits
    4,219,635       3,258,328       12,628,179       9,266,254  
Occupancy and equipment expense
    1,212,522       827,839       3,375,614       2,404,268  
Postage, printing and supplies
    113,098       120,988       357,444       368,029  
Professional fees
    124,152       121,126       471,245       347,171  
Data processing
    473,512       393,291       1,359,070       1,048,903  
Advertising
    289,770       194,365       791,351       494,321  
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets
    4,072       4,072       12,216       12,216  
Other noninterest expenses
    1,364,110       627,251       3,655,767       1,881,008  
 
                       
Total noninterest expense
    7,800,871       5,547,260       22,650,886       15,822,170  
 
                       
Income (loss) before applicable income taxes
    1,117,713       91,332       (2,408,251 )     2,178,769  
Applicable income tax (benefit) expense
    266,621       (72,866 )     (1,198,888 )     484,324  
 
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ 851,092       164,198       (1,209,363 )     1,694,445  
 
                       
 
                               
Per share amounts:
                               
Basic earnings (loss) per share
  $ 0.04       0.01       (0.06 )     0.08  
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
    20,687,321       20,654,884       20,656,388       20,238,722  
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
  $ 0.04       0.01       (0.06 )     0.08  
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
    20,920,384       21,704,099       21,048,143       21,224,967  
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

2


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
                 
    2008     2007  
Net income (loss)
  $ (1,209,363 )     1,694,445  
 
           
 
               
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax:
               
 
               
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
    (3,594,200 )     131,929  
 
               
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net income
    (312,250 )     7,026  
 
               
 
           
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax
    (3,281,950 )     138,955  
 
               
Income tax related to items of other comprehensive income (loss)
    (1,115,863 )     47,245  
 
           
 
               
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
    (2,166,087 )     91,710  
 
           
 
               
Total comprehensive income (loss)
  $ (3,375,450 )     1,786,155  
 
           
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
                                                 
                                    Accumulated     Total  
                                    other     stock-  
    Common             Retained     Treasury     comprehensive     holders’  
    stock     Surplus     earnings     stock     income     equity  
Balance at December 31, 2006
  $ 4,892,812       110,042,307       8,867,359             (305,886 )     123,496,592  
Net income
                1,694,445                   1,694,445  
Issuance of 1,071,973 shares of common stock (91,100 shares from treasury)
    245,218       12,282,983             966,600             13,494,801  
Stock options exercised - 100,000 shares
    25,000       563,313                         588,313  
Treasury stock purchased - 104,128 shares
                      (1,123,461 )           (1,123,461 )
Issuance of 10,827 shares of common stock (3,632 shares from treasury) in connection with Employee Stock Purchase Plan
    1,799       83,503             44,109             129,411  
800 shares of common stock awarded to directors
    200       9,800                         10,000  
Stock issuance costs
          (28,759 )                       (28,759 )
Stock option expense
          305,397                         305,397  
Change in valuation of available-for-sale securities, net of related tax effect
                            91,710       91,710  
 
                                   
Balance at September 30, 2007
  $ 5,165,029       123,258,544       10,561,804       (112,752 )     (214,176 )     138,658,449  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Balance at December 31, 2007
  $ 5,170,519       123,329,517       10,982,306             408,631       139,890,973  
Net loss
                (1,209,363 )                 (1,209,363 )
Issuance of 9,615 shares of common stock from treasury
          (34,892 )           115,380             80,488  
Stock options exercised - 101,000 shares (12,296 from treasury)
    22,176       519,657             147,552             689,385  
Treasury stock purchased - 105,324 shares
                      (1,305,000 )           (1,305,000 )
Issuance of 2,565 shares of common stock from treasury as partial payment for certain operating leases
          (5,771 )           30,780             25,009  
1,400 shares of common stock from treasury awarded to directors
          (3,449 )           16,800             13,351  
Stock option expense
          421,946                         421,946  
Amortization of restricted stock
          88,880             30,000             118,880  
Change in valuation of available-for-sale securities, net of related tax effect
                            (2,166,087 )     (2,166,087 )
 
                                   
Balance at September 30, 2008
  $ 5,192,695       124,315,888       9,772,943       (964,488 )     (1,757,456 )     136,559,582  
 
                                   
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
                 
    2008     2007  
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net (loss) income
  $ (1,209,363 )     1,694,445  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    1,592,243       1,130,140  
Provision for possible loan losses
    8,539,000       2,405,000  
Capitalized interest expense on construction
    (85,984 )     (439,669 )
Stock option compensation cost
    421,946       305,397  
Common stock awarded to directors
    13,351       10,000  
Amortization of restricted stock expense
    118,880        
Losses on sale of other real estate
    38,525       10,389  
Net (gains) losses on sale of debt and equity securities
    (312,250 )     7,026  
Increase in accrued interest receivable
    (483,032 )     (767,334 )
Increase in accrued interest payable
    583,668       383,735  
Mortgage loans originated for sale in secondary market
    (18,076,916 )     (6,915,625 )
Mortgage loans sold in secondary market
    17,087,483       6,692,500  
Other operating activities, net
    425,966       375,890  
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    8,653,517       4,891,894  
 
           
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Purchase of available-for-sale debt and equity securities
    (90,282,122 )     (9,952,158 )
Proceeds from maturities and calls of available-for-sale debt securities
    45,513,113       24,712,652  
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale debt securities
    27,252,250       4,547,333  
Net increase in loans
    (325,613,463 )     (175,998,335 )
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned
    1,141,834       3,681,227  
Construction expenditures to finish other real estate
    (48,525 )      
Purchase of bank premises and equipment
    (5,565,726 )     (10,929,789 )
Proceeds from sale of bank premises and equipment
    105,685       60,799  
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (347,496,954 )     (163,878,271 )
 
           
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Net increase in deposits
    261,957,774       120,867,782  
(Decrease) increase in short-term borrowings
    (2,110,304 )     1,858,385  
Proceeds from notes payable to Federal Home Loan Bank
    93,000,000       30,000,000  
Payments of notes payable to Federal Home Loan Bank
    (12,000,000 )     (4,300,000 )
Purchase of treasury stock
    (1,305,000 )     (1,123,461 )
Stock options exercised
    689,385       588,313  
Issuance of common stock
    80,488       13,624,212  
Payment of stock issuance costs
          (28,759 )
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    340,312,343       161,486,472  
 
           
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    1,468,906       2,500,095  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    13,290,440       8,474,181  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 14,759,346       10,974,276  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental information:
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 30,341,300       27,548,609  
Cash paid for income taxes
    425,000       676,000  
Noncash transactions:
               
Transfers to other real estate in settlement of loans
    8,243,326       4,478,902  
Loans made to facilitate the sale of other real estate
          275,912  
Capitalized interest expense
    85,984       439,669  
Common stock awarded to directors
    13,350       10,000  
Stock option compensation cost
    421,946       305,397  
Amortization of restricted stock expense
    118,880        
Stock issued for operating lease payments
    25,009        
 
           
See accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers throughout the St. Louis metropolitan area in Missouri and Illinois and southwestern Florida through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Reliance Bank and Reliance Bank, F.S.B. (the “Banks”).
The Company and Banks are subject to competition from other financial and nonfinancial institutions providing financial products throughout the St. Louis metropolitan area and southwestern Florida. Additionally, the Company and Banks are subject to the regulations of certain Federal and state agencies and undergo periodic examinations by those regulatory agencies.
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and Banks conform to generally accepted accounting principles within the banking industry. In compiling the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to change in a short period of time include the determination of the reserve for possible loan losses, valuation of other real estate owned and stock options, and determination of possible impairment of intangible assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Certain amounts in the 2007 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation. Such reclassifications have no effect on previously reported net income or stockholders’ equity.
Operating results for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the year ending December 31, 2008. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Principles of Consolidation
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and Banks. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Basis of Accounting
The Company and Banks utilize the accrual basis of accounting, which includes in the total of net income all revenues earned and expenses incurred, regardless of when actual cash payments are received or paid. The Company is also required to report comprehensive income, of which net income is a component. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity (net assets) of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources, including all changes in equity during a period, except those resulting from investments by, and distributions to, owners.

6


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Cash Flow Information
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash equivalents include due from banks, interest-earning deposits in banks (all of which are payable on demand), and Federal funds sold. Certain balances maintained in other financial institutions generally exceed the level of deposits insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Stock Issuance Costs
The Company incurs certain costs associated with the issuance of its common stock. Such costs were recorded as a reduction of equity capital.
New Accounting Standards
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”) clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes in financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 became effective and was implemented in 2007 by the Company; however, Company management believes that the Company maintains no uncertain tax positions for tax reporting purposes, and, accordingly, no FIN 48 liability is required to be recorded.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (“FAS No. 157”) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“FAS No. 159”). In accordance with the FASB Staff Position 157-2, Effective Date of SFAS No. 157, the Company has not applied the provisions of FAS No. 157 to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities such as other real estate owned and goodwill. The Company uses fair value measurements to determine fair value disclosures.
The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets recorded at fair value:
Investments in Available-For-Sale Debt Securities - Investments in available-for-sale debt securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company’s available-for sale debt securities are measured at fair value using Level 2 valuations. The market evaluation utilizes several sources which include observable inputs rather than “significant unobservable inputs” and, therefore, fall into the Level 2 category. The table below presents the balances of available-for sale debt securities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
         
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations
  $ 66,847,242  
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
    33,615,128  
Other debt securities
    4,831,760  
Mortgage-backed securities
    62,488,281  
 
     
 
  $ 167,782,411  
 
     
Loans - The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis other than loans that are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. At September 30, 2008, all impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the collateral is based upon an observable market price or current

7


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
appraised value, and, therefore, the Company classifies these assets in the nonrecurring Level 2 category. The total principal balance of impaired loans measured at fair value at September 30, 2008 was $15,258,135.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share data is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution of earnings per share which could occur under the treasury stock method if contracts to issue common stock, such as stock options, were exercised. The following table presents a summary of per share data and amounts for the periods indicated.
                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
Basic
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ 851,092       164,198       (1,209,363 )     1,694,445  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    20,687,321       20,654,884       20,656,388       20,238,722  
 
                       
 
                               
Basic earnings (loss) per share
  $ 0.04       0.01       (0.06 )     0.08  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ 851,092       164,198       (1,209,363 )     1,694,445  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    20,687,321       20,654,884       20,656,388       20,238,722  
Effect of dilutive stock options
    233,063       1,049,215       391,755       986,245  
 
                       
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
    20,920,384       21,704,099       21,048,143       21,224,967  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
  $ 0.04       0.01       (0.06 )     0.08  
 
                       
NOTE 2 — INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Identifiable intangible assets include the core deposit premium relating to the Company’s acquisition of The Bank of Godfrey, which is being amortized into noninterest expense on a straight-line basis over 15 years. Amortization of the core deposit intangible assets existing at September 30, 2008 will be $4,072 per quarter until completely amortized.
The excess of the Company’s consideration given in its acquisition of The Bank of Godfrey over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill, an intangible asset on the consolidated balance sheets. Goodwill is the Company’s only intangible asset with an indefinite useful life, and the Company is required to test the intangible asset for impairment on an annual basis. Impairment is measured as the excess of carrying value over the fair value of an intangible asset with an indefinite life. No impairment writedown has thusfar been required on this intangible asset.
NOTE 3 — STOCK OPTIONS
The Company maintains various stock option plans. Prior to 2006, the Company applied the intrinsic value-based method, as outlined in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, (“APB 25”) and related interpretations, in accounting for stock options granted under these plans. Under the intrinsic value-based method, no compensation expense was recognized if the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock options was equal to or greater than the market price of the

8


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
underlying stock on the date of the grant. Accordingly, prior to 2006, no compensation cost was recognized in the consolidated statements of income for stock options granted to employees, since all options granted under the Company’s stock option plans had an exercise price equal to or greater than the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of the grant.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) (“FAS 123R”) Share-based Payments. This statement replaces FAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB 25. FAS 123R requires that all stock-based compensation be recognized as an expense in the financial statements and that such cost be measured at the grant date fair value for all equity classified awards. The Company adopted this statement using the modified prospective method, which requires the Company to recognize compensation expense on a prospective basis for all outstanding unvested awards. Therefore, prior period financial statements have not been restated. Under this method, in addition to reflecting compensation expense for share-based awards granted after the adoption date, expense is also recognized to reflect the remaining service period of awards that had been included in pro forma disclosures in prior periods.
Based on the valuation and accounting uncertainties that outstanding options presented under proposed accounting treatment at the time, the Board of Directors accelerated the vesting of substantially all of the Company’s outstanding stock options during the fourth quarter of 2005. This action resulted in the remaining fair value of substantially all of the outstanding stock options being recognized in 2005 as part of the pro-forma disclosures in previous periods.
The weighted average fair values of options granted during the first nine months of 2008 and 2007 were $2.24 and $3.87, respectively, for an option to purchase one share of Company common stock; however, the Company has only been in existence since July 24, 1998, and the Company’s common stock is not actively traded on any exchange. Accordingly, the availability of fair value information for the Company’s common stock is limited. In using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value the options, several assumptions have been made in arriving at the estimated fair value of the options granted during the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, including 0-20% volatility in the Company’s common stock price, no dividends paid on the common stock, an expected weighted average option life of 6.0 years for options granted in 2008 and 2007, and a risk-free interest rate approximating the U.S. Treasury rates for the applicable duration period. Any change in these assumptions could have a significant impact on the effects of determining compensation costs.

9


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Following is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
                                 
    Options Granted Under     Options Granted to Directors  
    Incentive Stock Option Plans     Under Nonqualified Plans  
    Weighted             Weighted         
    Average             Average        
    Option Price     Number     Option Price     Number  
    per Share     of Shares     per Share     of Shares  
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007:
                               
Balance at December 31, 2006
  $ 6.57       1,648,200     $ 6.63       576,000  
Granted
    13.40       169,500       16.38       125,000  
Forfeited
    11.67       (4,500 )     4.85       (5,000 )
Exercised
    5.73       (90,000 )     7.25       (10,000 )
 
                           
Balance at September 30, 2007
  $ 7.27       1,723,200     $ 8.41       686,000  
 
                       
 
                               
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008:
                               
Balance at December 31, 2007
  $ 7.31       1,648,200     $ 8.41       701,000  
Granted
    12.89       91,000       11.58       16,000  
Forfeited
    13.87       (27,250 )     9.14       (41,500 )
Exercised
    6.83       (101,000 )            
 
                           
Balance at September 30, 2008
  $ 7.54       1,610,950     $ 8.44       675,500  
 
                       
The weighted average option prices for the 2,286,450 and 2,409,200 options outstanding at September 30, 2008 and 2007, were $7.81 and $7.59, respectively. At September 30, 2008, options to purchase an additional 495,800 shares of Company common stock were available for future grants under the various plans.
NOTE 4 — DISCLOSURES ABOUT FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Banks issue financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of the business of meeting the financing needs of their customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and may involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the balance sheets. The contractual amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Banks have in particular classes of these financial instruments.
The Banks’ exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Banks use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as they do for financial instruments included on the balance sheets. Following is a summary of the Banks’ off-balance-sheet financial instruments at September 30, 2008:
         
Financial instruments for which contractual amounts represent:
       
Commitments to extend credit
  $ 288,866,860  
Standby letters of credit
    23,174,333  
 
     
 
  $ 312,041,193  
 
     
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Of the total commitments to extend credit at September 30, 2008,

10


Table of Contents

RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
$117,666,096 was made at fixed rates of interest. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since certain of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Banks evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Banks upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies, but is generally residential or income-producing commercial property or equipment, on which the Banks generally have a superior lien.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Banks to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party, for which draw requests have historically not been made thereon. Such guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

11


Table of Contents

Part I — Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following presents management’s discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. This discussion and analysis is intended to review the significant factors affecting the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, and provides a more comprehensive review which is not otherwise apparent from the consolidated financial statements alone. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements included in this report and the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007, included in our most recent Form 10-K.
The Company has prepared all of the consolidated financial information in this report in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). In preparing the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Company makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. No assurances can be given that actual results will not differ from those estimates.
Forward-Looking Statements
Readers should note that in addition to the historical information contained herein, some of the information in this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements typically are identified with use of terms such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “potential,” “could”, and similar words, although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. There are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements, certain of which are beyond our control. These factors, risks and uncertainties are discussed in our most recent Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), as updated from time to time in our future SEC filings. The Company does not intend to publicly revise or update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this report.
Overview
The Company provides a full range of banking services to individual and corporate customers throughout the St. Louis metropolitan area in Missouri and Illinois and southwestern Florida through the 26 locations of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Reliance Bank and Reliance Bank, FSB (hereinafter referred to as the “Banks”). The Company was incorporated and began its development stage activities on July 24, 1998. Such development stage activities (i.e., applying for a banking charter, raising capital, acquiring property, and developing policies and procedures, etc.) led to the opening of Reliance Bank (as a new bank) upon receipt of all regulatory approvals on April 16, 1999. Since its opening in 1999 through September 30, 2008, Reliance Bank has added 20 branch locations in the St. Louis metropolitan area of Missouri and Illinois and Loan Production Offices (“LPO’s”) in Houston, Texas and Phoenix, Arizona and has grown its total assets, loans and deposits to $1.4 billion, $1.1 billion, and $1.0 billion, respectively, at September 30, 2008.
Effective May 31, 2003, the Company purchased The Bank of Godfrey, a Godfrey, Illinois state banking institution. The Godfrey bank was merged with and into Reliance Bank on October 31, 2005. Reliance Bank also opened a LPO in Ft. Myers, Florida on July 1, 2004. Effective January 17, 2006, the Company opened a new Federal Savings Bank, Reliance Bank, FSB, in Ft. Myers, Florida, and loans totaling approximately $14 million that were originated by the Reliance Bank LPO were transferred to Reliance Bank, FSB. Since its opening in 2006 through September 30, 2008, Reliance Bank, FSB has added four branch locations in southwestern Florida and has grown its total assets, loans, and deposits to $110.3 million, $87.1 million, and $75.7 million, respectively, at September 30, 2008.
At September 30, 2008, Reliance Bank’s total assets, total revenues, and net income represented 92.51%, 93.39%, and (81.81%), respectively, of the Company’s consolidated total assets, total revenues, and net loss. Reliance Bank, FSB’s total assets, total revenues, and net loss represented 7.48%, 6.78%, and 152.20%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated totals. The Company incurred a net loss of $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

12


Table of Contents

During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company completed building its St. Louis metropolitan branch network. The Company plans to continue building its branch network in southwestern Florida, with three additional branches planned; however, the building of these branches has been suspended while management focuses on Reliance Bank, FSB’s profitability. The Company’s branch expansion plans are designed to increase the Company’s market share in the St. Louis metropolitan area in Missouri and Illinois and southwestern Florida and to allow the Company’s banking subsidiaries to compete with much larger financial institutions in these markets. The Houston and Phoenix LPO’s are intended to benefit from commercial and residential lending and fee income generation opportunities in these larger and historically higher-growth markets.
The St. Louis metropolitan, southwestern Florida, Houston and Phoenix markets in which the Company’s banking subsidiaries operate are highly competitive in the financial services area. The Banks are subject to competition from other financial and nonfinancial institutions providing financial products throughout these markets.
The Company’s total consolidated assets increased to $1.5 billion at September 30, 2008, with loans and deposits increasing to $1.2 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, primarily as a result of the Company’s continued emphasis on growth to improve its market share. The branch locations of the Banks have provided the Company with excellent strategic locations from which depositors and borrowers can be accessed. Three Reliance Bank branches were opened in 2008, six Reliance Bank branches were opened in 2006, one branch was opened in 2005, four branches were opened in 2004, two branches were opened in 2003, and one branch was opened each year in 2002, 2001, and 1999. Three Reliance Bank, FSB branches were opened in 2007 and one branch was opened in 2006. The Company has sought to staff each new branch location with an experienced commercial lender familiar with that branch’s market area and other experienced banking personnel.
The Company has funded its Banks’ branch expansion with several private placement stock offerings made to accredited investors since its inception. The Company has held a total of 13 such offerings since its inception and has sold a net 20,770,781 shares of Company Common Stock for a total of $129.5 million through September 30, 2008.
The Company’s consolidated net income (loss) for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $(1,209,363) and $1,694,445, respectively. Consolidated net income for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $851,092 and $164,198, respectively. While the Company’s consolidated total assets and net interest income have continued to grow, the Company has continued to experience pricing pressures on its loans and deposits, and the provision for possible loan losses was increased for an increase in nonperforming loans, resulting from a softening in the real estate markets in which the Company’s banking subsidiaries operate and the overall economic downturn experienced nationally. These factors and their effect on the Company’s results of operations are discussed in more detail below.
Net interest income before the provision for possible loan losses for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $26,791,457 and $19,129,603, respectively. Net interest income before the provision for possible loan losses for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $10,134,264 and $6,739,978, respectively. This growth in net interest income resulted from an increasing level of interest-earning assets during this time period, with an increasingly proportionate share of such interest-earning assets being comprised of loans, which are the Company’s highest interest-earning assets.
Holding down the net interest income earned by the Company during these periods was an increasing cost of funds on an increasing total of interest-bearing liabilities. Interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $30,838,984 and $27,548,609, respectively. Interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $10,610,768 and $9,775,314, respectively.
The softening of the real estate market and the overall economic downturn that has occurred during the past twelve to eighteen months on a national scale has also been experienced in the St. Louis metropolitan and southwestern Florida areas. Residential home building and sales have declined significantly from the levels enjoyed prior to 2007. As a result, the Company has experienced an increase in nonperforming assets (which include nonperforming loans and other real estate owned). Nonperforming assets totaled $26.9 million at September 30, 2008 compared with $10.4 million at September 30, 2007. The reserve for possible loan losses as a percentage of net outstanding loans was 1.01% at September 30, 2008 compared with 1.06% at September 30, 2007. Net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 totaled $5.8 million compared with $615 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

13


Table of Contents

Net charge-offs for the three months ended September 30, 2008 totaled $2.1 million compared with $161 thousand for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The provision for possible loan losses charged to expense for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $8,539,000 and $2,405,000, respectively, and $1,800,000 and $1,515,000 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in the provision for loan losses in these nine and three-month periods of 2008 was a direct reaction to the continued softening of the real estate market and overall economic downturn. See further discussion regarding the Company’s management of credit risk in the section below entitled “Risk Management.”
As the Company has grown its assets, the total of noninterest income has grown and new products have been introduced. Total noninterest income for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $1,990,178 and $1,276,336, respectively, and $584,320 and $413,614 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Company’s fixed rate mortgage lending operation, which was established to arrange for long-term fixed rate commercial real estate financing with institutional investors, generated commission income of $228,671 and $418,825 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $145,800 and $100,500 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Residential mortgage lending operations (in which fixed rate loans are originated and sold in the secondary market) were also expanded beginning in 2007. Total income from these secondary market activities was $220,180 and $180,956 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $41,538 and $48,256 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Deposit service charge income also increased due to a larger deposit base. The Company also sold $27.3 million of available-for-sale investment securities in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 for a net gain of $312,250. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Company sold $4.2 million of available-for-sale investment securities for a net gain of $117.
Noninterest expenses have increased significantly during the nine and three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, resulting from the Company’s branch expansion program and increased level of problem assets. Total noninterest expense was $22,650,886 and $15,822,170 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $7,800,871 and $5,547,260 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Company’s effective tax rate for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was 49.78% and 22.23%, respectively, and 23.85% and 79.78% for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The change in effective tax rates during these periods is a result of the effect that tax-exempt interest income levels have on this percentage.
The Company’s basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the nine and three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, reflect the Company’s focus on growth in equity ownership and total assets, loans and deposits, with less of an emphasis on short-term earnings per share, as well as the problems experienced in the real estate markets of the St. Louis metropolitan area and southwestern Florida. Basic earnings (loss) per share were $(0.06) and $0.08 per share for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $.04 and $.01 per share for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Fully-diluted earnings (loss) per share for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were $(0.06) and $0.08 per share, respectively, and $0.04 and $.01 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Following are certain of the Company’s ratios generally followed in the banking industry for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
                                 
    As of and for the     As of and for the  
    Nine Months Ended Sept. 30,     Quarters Ended Sept. 30,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
Percentage of net income to:
                               
Average total assets
    (0.12 )%     0.23 %     0.23 %     0.06 %
Average stockholders’ equity
    (1.16 )%     1.71 %     2.47 %     0.47 %
Percentage of common dividends declared to net income per common share
                       
Percentage of average stockholders’ equity to average total assets
    10.60 %     13.52 %     9.43 %     13.35 %

14


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies
The impact and any associated risks related to the Company’s critical accounting policies on business operations are discussed throughout “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for year ended December 31, 2007 and the related “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Form 10-K, which was filed March 28, 2008. Management believes there have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies during the first nine months of 2008.
Results of Operations for the Three and Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
Net Interest Income
The Company’s net interest income increased $7,661,854 (40.05%) to $26,791,457 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 from the $19,129,603 earned during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007. The Company’s net interest margin for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was 2.90% and 2.80%, respectively. The Company’s net interest income increased $3,394,286 (50.36%) to $10,134,264 for the three-month period ended September 30, 2008 from the $6,739,978 earned during the three-month period ended September 30, 2007. The Company’s net interest margin for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was 2.96% and 2.76%, respectively.
Average earning assets for the first nine months of 2008 increased $320,500,787 (34.44%) to $1,251,070,616 from the level of $930,569,829 for the first nine months of 2007. Average earning assets for the third quarter of 2008 increased $402,539,742 (41.07%) to $1,382,742,565 from the level of $980,202,823 for the third quarter of 2007. This strong growth in interest earning assets was primarily due to the growth in the loan portfolio. Total average loans for the first nine months of 2008 increased $333,958,709 (45.35%) to $1,070,366,888 from the level of $736,408,179 for the first nine months of 2007. Total average loans for the third quarter of 2008 increased $388,825,400 (48.42%) to $1,191,904,958 from the level of $803,079,558 for the third quarter of 2008. The Company’s addition of LPO’s in Houston and Phoenix and expanding branch program and practice of adding an experienced commercial lender at each new branch were the primary reasons for the strong growth in the Company’s loan portfolio during these periods.
Total average investment securities for the first nine months of 2008 decreased $8,483,436 (4.64%) to $174,348,180 from the level of $182,831,616 for the first nine months of 2007. Total average investment securities for the third quarter of 2008 increased $7,224,687 (4.12%) to $182,478,731 from the level of $175,254,044 for the third quarter of 2007. The Company uses its investment portfolio to (a) provide support for borrowing arrangements for securities sold under repurchase agreements, (b) provide support for pledging purposes for deposits of governmental and municipality deposits over $100,000, (c) provide a secondary source of liquidity through “laddered” maturities of such securities, and (d) provide increased interest income over that which would be earned on overnight/daily fund investments. The total carrying value of securities pledged to secure public funds and repurchase agreements was approximately $134.1 million at September 30, 2008. The Banks have also pledged letters of credit from the Federal Home Loan Banks totaling $44,615,000 as additional collateral to secure public funds at September 30, 2008.
Average short-term investments can fluctuate significantly from day to day based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the collected balances of customer deposits, loan demand and investment security maturities. Excess funds not invested in loans or investment securities are invested in overnight funds with various unaffiliated financial institutions. The average balances of such short-term investments for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were $6,355,548 and $11,330,034, respectively. The average balances of such short-term investments for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were $8,358,876 and $1,869,221, respectively.
A key factor in attempting to increase the Company’s net interest margin is to maintain a higher percentage of earning assets in the loan category, which is the Company’s highest earning asset category. Average loans as a percentage of average earning assets were 85.56% for the first nine months of 2008, which was a 6.42% increase over the 79.14%

15


Table of Contents

achieved in the first nine months of 2007. Average loans as a percentage of average earning assets were 86.20% for the third quarter of 2008, which was a 4.27% increase over the 81.93% achieved in the third quarter of 2007.
Funding the Company’s growth in interest-earning assets has been a challenge in the markets in which the Company’s banking subsidiaries operate. When the stock market was rebounding over the past three years from its depressed levels in 2004 and 2003, deposits were not as plentiful in the banking market overall, until the second half of 2007, when a softening real estate economy significantly reduced loan demand. The stock market has also declined from its record levels in 2007. Additionally, the St. Louis metropolitan area has added over ten new banks in recent years (as well as several institutions such as Reliance Bank adding numerous branches), resulting in an intensely competitive environment for customer deposits during the past few years. Competition for deposits in southwestern Florida has been equally as intense as the market for deposits in the St. Louis metropolitan area. As a result, the Company has had to supplement its deposit growth with alternate funding sources, including short-term overnight borrowings from unaffiliated financial institutions, sweep repurchase agreement borrowing arrangements with several of the Company’s larger depositors, and longer term advances from the Federal Home Loan Banks. Additionally, the inflated rates at which deposits have been offered in such competitive markets have served to offset the gains achieved in the Company’s net interest margin from loan growth.
Total average interest-bearing deposits for the first nine months of 2008 were $911,769,174, an increase of $188,976,231 (26.15%) from the level of $722,792,943 for the first nine months of 2007. Total average interest-bearing deposits for the third quarter of 2008 were $1,014,441,074, an increase of $273,754,703 (36.96%) from the level of $740,686,371 for the third quarter of 2007. This increase in deposits resulted from the Company’s aggressive branch expansion and aggressive pricing of deposits. The Company’s banking subsidiaries have sought to be aggressive on deposits, without necessarily being the highest rate available in their markets.
The Company’s short-term borrowings consist of overnight funds borrowed from unaffiliated financial institutions and securities sold under sweep repurchase agreements with larger deposit customers. The averages for securities sold under sweep repurchase agreements for the first nine months of 2008 and 2007 were $40,416,939 and $27,731,031, respectively. The averages for securities sold under sweep repurchase agreements for the third quarters of 2008 and 2007 were $38,360,162 and $28,839,047, respectively. Securities sold under sweep repurchase agreements have continued to provide a stable source of funding from certain of the Company’s larger depositors. The averages for funds purchased through daily/overnight borrowing arrangements for the first nine months of 2008 and 2007 totaled $41,160,319 and $15,153,822, respectively. The averages for funds purchased through daily/overnight borrowing arrangements for the third quarters of 2008 and 2007 totaled $51,316,409 and $28,768,859, respectively. Daily/overnight funds are used for short-term liquidity purposes as a less expensive alternative to the intensely competitive deposit market.
The Company also uses longer-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank as a less expensive alternative to the intensely competitive deposit market, particularly when such longer-term fixed rate advances can be matched up with longer-term fixed rate assets. The average balance of Federal Home Loan Bank advances grew $88,813,543 (282.04%) to $120,302,920 for the first nine months of 2008, compared with $31,489,377 for the first nine months of 2007. The average balance of Federal Home Loan Bank advances grew $102,576,088 (241.66%) to $145,021,740 for the third quarter of 2008, compared with the $42,445,652 average balance for the third quarter of 2007.
The overall mix of the Company’s funding sources has a significant impact on the Company’s net interest margin. Following is a summary of the percentage of the various components of average interest-bearing liabilities and noninterest-bearing deposits to the total of all average interest-bearing liabilities and noninterest-bearing deposits (hereinafter described as “total funding sources”) for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    September 30,   September 30,
    2008   2007   2008   2007
Average deposits:
                               
Noninterest-bearing
    4.47 %     5.36 %     4.71 %     5.14 %
 
                               
Interest-bearing:
                               
Transaction accounts
    12.33       19.66       14.14       18.34  
Savings
    3.64       6.72       4.19       7.37  

16


Table of Contents

                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    September 30,   September 30,
    2008   2007   2008   2007
Time deposits of $100,000 or more
    28.75       23.86       28.58       26.60  
Other time deposits
    32.86       33.14       31.11       33.70  
 
                               
Total average interest-bearing deposits
    77.58       83.38       78.02       86.01  
 
                               
Total average deposits
    82.05       88.74       82.73       91.15  
 
                               
Average short-term borrowings:
                               
Sweep repurchase agreements
    2.93       3.25       3.46       3.30  
Daily/overnight funds purchased
    3.93       3.24       3.52       1.80  
 
                               
Total average short-term borrowings
    6.86       6.49       6.98       5.10  
Average longer-term advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
    11.09       4.77       10.29       3.75  
 
                               
 
    100.00 %     100.00 %     100.00 %     100.00 %
 
                               
The composition of the Company’s deposit portfolio has fluctuated as new branches were added, which served to diversify the Company’s deposit base. The overall level of interest rates will also cause fluctuations between categories. The Company has sought to increase the percentage of its noninterest-bearing deposits to the total of all funding sources; however, in the competitive markets in which the Company’s banking subsidiaries operate, this has been difficult. Over the past two years, the Company modified its pricing strategies on its savings (reducing rates) and transaction accounts (raising rates) products, resulting in a significant shift in mix from savings to interest-bearing transaction accounts. For the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, the Company’s most significant funding source has continued to be certificates of deposit, which comprised 59.69% of total average funding sources during the first nine months of 2008, as compared with 60.30% during the first nine months of 2007. Certificates of deposit have a lagging effect with interest rate changes, as most certificates of deposit have longer maturities at fixed rates. Due to the instability in the wholesale funding market, opportunity arose to take advantage of a lower cost of funds in the wholesale market compared to retail deposits. The positive result of this increase is reflected in the Company’s improved net interest margin for the first nine months of 2008; however, this has significantly tightened the Company’s liquidity.
The following table sets forth, on a tax-equivalent basis for the period indicated, a summary of the changes in interest income and interest expense resulting from changes in volume and changes in yield/rates:
                                                 
    Amount of Increase (Decrease)  
    Third Quarter                     First Nine Months  
                    Change From 2007 to 2008 Due to              
            Yield/                     Yield/        
    Volume (1)     Rate (2)     Total     Volume (1)     Rate (2)     Total  
       
Interest income:
                                               
Loans
  $ 6,249,348       (2,028,919 )     4,220,429     $ 16,492,495       (4,862,334 )     11,630,161  
Investment securities:
                                               
Taxable
    89,866       (89,871 )     (5 )     (340,830 )     (75,482 )     (416,312 )
Exempt from Federal income taxes
    (8,413 )     66,392       57,979       45,155       (11,276 )     33,879  
Short-term investments
    52,736       (35,833 )     16,903       (162,547 )     (139,591 )     (302,138 )
 
                                   
Total interest income
    6,383,537       (2,088,231 )     4,295,306       16,034,273       (5,088,683 )     10,945,590  
 
                                   
Interest expense:
                                               
Interest bearing transaction accounts
    (138,771 )     (912,850 )     (1,051,621 )     341,814       (2,388,991 )     (2,047,177 )
Savings accounts
    (76,487 )     (181,376 )     (257,863 )     (260,113 )     (564,290 )     (824,403 )
Time deposits of $100,000 or more
    1,658,870       (864,209 )     794,661       3,659,489       (1,698,420 )     1,961,069  
Other time deposits
    1,373,309       (732,327 )     640,982       2,641,415       (921,328 )     1,720,087  
 
                                   
Total deposits
    2,816,921       (2,690,762 )     126,159       6,382,605       (5,573,029 )     809,576  
Funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements
    305,360       (485,012 )     (179,652 )     1,017,529       (942,409 )     75,120  
Long-term borrowings
    985,483       (96,536 )     888,947       2,577,181       (171,502 )     2,405,679  
 
                                   
Total interest expense
    4,107,764       (3,272,310 )     835,454       9,977,315       (6,686,940 )     3,290,375  
 
                                   
Net interest income
  $ 2,275,773       1,184,079       3,459,852     $ 6,056,958       1,598,257       7,655,215  
 
                                   
 
(1)   Change in volume multiplied by yield/rate of prior year.

17


Table of Contents

 
(2)   Change in yield/rate multiplied by volume of prior year.
NOTE:   The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.
During the last half of 2007 through the third quarter of 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank has lowered its Federal funds target interest rate 3.25%, in an attempt to stimulate the sluggish national economy. Such actions have caused the overall rates earned and paid by the Company to be lowered; however, not all financial instruments reprice at the same time. Floating rate loans reprice immediately, while certificates of deposit and other fixed rate instruments have a lagging effect with interest rate changes. Competition will also cause interest rates to react differently.
Provision for Possible Loan Losses
The provision for possible loan losses charged to earnings for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $8,539,000 and $2,405,000, respectively. The provision for possible loan losses charged to earnings for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $1,800,000 and $1,515,000, respectively. Net charge-offs for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $5,825,054 and $615,474, respectively. Net charge-offs for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 totaled $2,083,464 and $161,614, respectively. At September 30, 2008 and 2007, the reserve for possible loan losses as a percentage of net outstanding loans was 1.01% and 1.06%, respectively. During Reliance Bank’s first three years of existence (1999, 2000, and 2001), Reliance Bank was required by the Missouri Division of Finance to maintain a minimum reserve for possible loan losses of at least 1.00% of net outstanding loans. Reliance Bank, FSB has a similar requirement through the year ended December 31, 2008. Accordingly, since its inception, the Company has sought to maintain its reserve for possible loan losses at a level of approximately 1.00% to 1.10% of net outstanding loans. The reserve for possible loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans (comprised of loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued and loans still accruing interest that were 90 days delinquent) was 81.26% and 100.83% at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The continued softening of the real estate market and overall economic downturn have resulted in an increase in the level of nonperforming loans and a higher provision for loan losses in the first nine months of 2008. See further discussion regarding the Company’s credit risk management in the section below entitled “Risk Management.”
Noninterest Income
Total noninterest income for the first nine months of 2008, excluding security sale gains and losses, increased $394,566 (30.14%) to $1,677,928 from the $1,283,362 earned for the first nine months of 2007. Total noninterest income for the third quarter of 2008, excluding security sale gains and losses, increased $170,589 (41.24%) to $584,203 from the $413,614 earned for the third quarter of 2007. The commercial real estate brokerage department earned commission income of $228,671 and $418,825 for the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, respectively. The commercial real estate brokerage department earned commission income of $145,800 and $100,500 for the third quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Commissions are earned by this department for arranging long-term, fixed rate commercial real estate financing for customers with institutional investors. Secondary market residential mortgage fee income was $220,180 and $180,956 for the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Secondary market residential mortgage fee income was $41,538 and $48,256 for the third quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively. These secondary market originators make long-term, fixed rate residential loans which are then sold into the secondary market. The company was a relatively new entrant into the secondary mortgage market, having just ramped up this business in 2007. Even with the softening of the real estate market, the secondary market has continued to remain relatively strong, but only at certain price points. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $220,852 (61.04%) to $582,678 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 from $361,826 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, due to the increased level of customer deposits and the fees generated by the Banks’ overdraft privilege programs. During the first nine months of 2008, the Company also sold $27.3 million of available-for-sale investment securities for a net gain of $312,250. From time to time, the Company will sell its available-for-sale investment securities for short-term liquidity purposes or longer-term asset/liability management reasons. See further discussion below in the sections entitled “Risk Management” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense increased $6,828,716 (43.16%) for the first nine months of 2008 to $22,650,886 from the $15,822,170 incurred during the first nine months of 2007. Noninterest expense increased $2,253,611 (40.63%) for the third quarter

18


Table of Contents

of 2008 to $7,800,871 from the $5,547,260 incurred during the third quarter of 2007. Most of the categories of noninterest expense increased due to the addition of six new branches and two LPOs during 2007 and 2008. The largest single component of the increase in noninterest expense for the first nine months and third quarter of 2008 was the category of salaries and employee benefits. Total personnel costs increased $3,361,925 (36.28%) for the first nine months of 2008 to $12,628,179 from the $9,266,254 of personnel costs incurred for the first nine months of 2007. Total personnel costs increased $961,307 (29.50%) for the third quarter of 2008 to $4,219,635 from the $3,258,328 of personnel costs incurred for the third quarter of 2007. The Company’s branch expansion program includes the hiring of personnel in each location with strong banking skills, including a seasoned commercial lender in each location. Due to the slowing economy, the Company has placed the opening of any new branches on hold. The Company had planned to open three additional branches in Florida in 2008.
The increased number of branches resulted in a growing level of occupancy and equipment expenses (including leases for temporary facilities during construction) during the first nine months and third quarter of 2008 compared with the first nine months and third quarter of 2007. Total occupancy and equipment expenses increased $971,346 (40.40%) to $3,375,614 for the first nine months of 2008 from the $2,404,268 incurred in the first nine months of 2007. Total occupancy and equipment expenses increased $384,683 (46.47%) to $1,212,522 for the third quarter of 2008 from the $827,839 incurred in the third quarter of 2007.
Total data processing expenses for the first nine months of 2008 increased $310,167 (29.57%) to $1,359,070, as compared with the $1,048,903 of expenses incurred for the first nine months of 2007. Total data processing expenses for the third quarter of 2008 increased $80,221 (20.40%) to $473,512, as compared with the $393,291 of expenses incurred for the third quarter of 2007. The increased number of customer accounts and additional new products offered has resulted in this increase in data processing expenses.
Total advertising expenses for the first nine months of 2008 increased $297,030 (60.09%) to $791,351, as compared with the $494,321 of expenses incurred for the first nine months of 2007. Total advertising expenses for the third quarter of 2008 increased $95,405 (49.09%) to $289,770, as compared with the $194,365 of expenses incurred for the third quarter of 2007. The increase is primarily related to the Company’s new branding and entry into the television media market.
Total professional fees increased $124,074 (35.74%) for the first nine months of 2008 to $471,245 from the $347,171 incurred for the first nine months of 2007. Total professional fees increased $3,026 (2.50%) for the third quarter of 2008 to $124,152 from the $121,126 incurred for the third quarter of 2007. Increased professional and legal costs relating to the Company’s nonperforming loans and charge-offs has contributed to this increase.
Other noninterest expenses increased $1,774,759 (94.35%) to $3,655,767 for the first nine months of 2008, from the $1,881,008 incurred for the first nine months of 2007. Other noninterest expenses increased $736,859 (117.47%) to $1,364,110 for the third quarter of 2008, from the $627,251 incurred for the third quarter of 2007. The increase during these periods is primarily due to (a) increased expenses relating to the operations of the Company’s expanding branch network, (b) additional costs incurred with its nonperforming assets, (c) an additional write-down on the value of Florida properties in the Company’s other real estate owned asset of $189,050, and (d) an additional $263,878 of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (“FDIC”) assessments in 2008. These assessments are based on the Banks’ net assets and have increased substantially on an industry-wide basis with the FDIC’s new assessment methodologies implemented in 2007.
Income Taxes
Applicable income tax expenses (benefits) totaled $(1,198,888) and $484,324 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effective tax rates for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were 49.78% and 22.23%, respectively. Applicable income tax (benefits) expenses totaled $266,622 and $(72,866) for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effective tax rates for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were 23.85% and 79.78%, respectively. The change in effective tax rates was primarily influenced by the level of tax-exempt interest income earned in each period.
Financial Condition
Total assets of the Company grew $339,976,958 (29.92%) in the first nine months of 2008 to $1,476,129,380 at September 30, 2008, from the level of $1,136,152,422 at December 31, 2007. This growth resulted from the Company’s continued

19


Table of Contents

emphasis on increasing its market share of loans and deposits with its branch expansion program, establishment of LPO’s in the Houston and Phoenix markets, a strong capital base, and competitive pricing of banking products.
Total deposits of the Company grew $261,957,774 (31.39%) in the first nine months of 2008 to $1,096,534,223 at September 30, 2008, from the level of $834,576,449 at December 31, 2007. This growth in deposits resulted from the Company’s branch expansion program and competitive pricing on deposit products.
Short-term borrowings at September 30, 2008 decreased $2,110,304 (2.39%) to $86,214,611 from the level of $88,324,915 at December 31, 2007, with the increase in longer-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances. Short-term borrowings will fluctuate significantly based on short-term liquidity needs and certain seasonal deposit trends. Longer-term borrowings have increased significantly during the first nine months of 2008. At September 30, 2008, total longer-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank were $149,000,000, as compared with $68,000,000 at December 31, 2007. These longer-term fixed rate advances were used as an alternative funding source to a competitive deposit market. Due to the instability in the wholesale funding market, opportunity arose to take advantage of a lower cost of funds in the wholesale market compared to retail deposits. The positive result of this increase is reflected in the Company’s improved net interest margin for the first nine months of 2008; however, this has significantly tightened the Company’s liquidity.
Total loans increased $313,205,844 (34.34%) in the first nine months of 2008 to $1,225,166,080 at September 30, 2008, from the level of $911,960,236 at December 31, 2007. Company management has emphasized the need to grow the loan portfolio to improve the Company’s net interest margin, without, however, sacrificing the quality of the Company’s assets. This emphasis is supported by the inclusion of a seasoned commercial lending officer at each of the Banks’ branches.
Investment securities, all of which are maintained as available-for-sale, increased $14,686,067 (8.97%) in the first nine months of 2008 to $178,331,285 at September 30, 2008, from the level of $163,645,218 at December 31, 2007. The Company’s investment portfolio growth is dependent upon the level of deposit growth and the funding requirements of the Company’s loan portfolio, as described above. Rates offered on investment grade and low risk bonds have continued to remain very low in the current economic market.
The capitalization of the Company has remained strong since its initial capitalization in 1998. Total capital at September 30, 2008 was $136,559,582, which computes to a capital-to-asset percentage of 9.25%. Since its inception, the Company has had 13 separate private placement offerings of its Common Stock to accredited investors.

20


Table of Contents

The following tables show the condensed average balance sheets for the periods reported and the percentage of each principal category of assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity to total assets. Also shown is the average yield on each category of interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on each category of interest-bearing liabilities for each of the periods reported.
                                 
    Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008  
            Percent     Interest     Average  
    Average     of Total     Income/     Yield/  
    Balance     Assets     Expense     Rate  
ASSETS
                               
Loans (1) (2) (3)
  $ 1,070,366,888       81.48 %   $ 51,501,359       6.43 %
Investment securities:
                               
Taxable
    136,085,251       10.36       4,806,351       4.72  
Exempt from Federal income taxes (3)
    38,262,929       2.91       1,536,860       5.37  
Short-term investments
    6,355,548       0.48       162,797       3.42  
 
                         
Total earning assets
    1,251,070,616       95.23       58,007,367       6.19  
 
                       
Nonearning assets:
                               
Cash and due from banks
    10,950,903       0.83                  
Reserve for possible loan losses
    (11,406,428 )     (0.87 )                
Premises and equipment
    43,961,674       3.35                  
Other assets
    18,810,531       1.44                  
Available-for-sale investment market valuation
    314,438       0.02                  
 
                           
Total nonearning assets
    62,631,118       4.77                  
 
                           
Total assets
  $ 1,313,701,734       100.00 %                
 
                           
LIABILITIES
                               
Interest-bearing liabilities
                               
Interest-bearing transaction accounts
  $ 165,207,045       12.58 %     3,027,936       2.45 %
Savings
    48,944,845       3.73       621,548       1.70  
Time deposits of $100,000 or more
    334,052,847       25.43       10,440,040       4.17  
Other time deposits
    363,564,437       27.67       11,604,872       4.26  
 
                         
Total interest-bearing deposits
    911,769,174       69.41       25,694,396       3.76  
Long-term borrowings
    120,302,920       9.16       3,463,592       3.85  
Funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements
    81,577,258       6.21       1,680,996       2.75  
 
                         
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    1,113,649,352       84.78       30,838,984       3.70  
 
                           
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    55,075,699       4.19                  
Other liabilities
    5,684,111       0.43                  
 
                           
Total liabilities
    1,174,409,162       89.40                  
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    139,292,572       10.60                  
 
                           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 1,313,701,734       100.00 %                
 
                           
Net interest income
                  $ 27,168,383          
 
                             
Net yield on earning assets
                            2.90 %
 
                             
(continued)

21


Table of Contents

                                 
    Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007  
            Percent     Interest     Average  
    Average     of Total     Income/     Yield/  
    Balance     Assets     Expense     Rate  
ASSETS
                               
Loans (1) (2) (3)
  $ 736,408,179       75.22 %   $ 39,871,198       7.24 %
Investment securities:
                               
Taxable
    145,699,487       14.88       5,222,663       4.79  
Exempt from Federal income taxes (3)
    37,132,129       3.79       1,502,981       5.41  
Short-term investments
    11,330,034       1.16       464,935       5.49  
 
                         
Total earning assets
    930,569,829       95.05       47,061,777       6.76  
 
                       
Nonearning assets:
                               
Cash and due from banks
    9,806,640       1.01                  
Reserve for possible loan losses
    (7,411,018 )     (0.76 )                
Premises and equipment
    36,260,504       3.70                  
Other assets
    10,780,453       1.10                  
Available-for-sale investment market valuation
    (991,940 )     (0.10 )                
 
                           
Total nonearning assets
    48,444,639       4.95                  
 
                           
Total assets
  $ 979,014,468       100.00 %                
 
                           
LIABILITIES
                               
Interest-bearing liabilities
                               
Interest-bearing transaction accounts
  $ 154,148,693       15.74 %     5,075,113       4.40 %
Savings
    61,939,351       6.33       1,445,951       3.12  
Time deposits of $100,000 or more
    223,509,035       22.83       8,478,971       5.07  
Other time deposits
    283,195,864       28.93       9,884,785       4.67  
 
                         
Total interest-bearing deposits
    722,792,943       73.83       24,884,820       4.60  
Long-term borrowings
    31,489,377       3.22       1,057,913       4.49  
Funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements
    42,884,853       4.38       1,605,876       5.01  
 
                         
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    797,167,173       81.43       27,548,609       4.62  
 
                           
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    43,199,115       4.41                  
Other liabilities
    6,243,834       0.64                  
 
                           
Total liabilities
    846,610,122       86.48                  
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    132,404,346       13.52                  
 
                           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 979,014,468       100.00 %                
 
                           
Net interest income
                  $ 19,513,168          
 
                             
Net yield on earning assets
                            2.80 %
 
                             
(continued)

22


Table of Contents

                                 
    Quarter Ended September 30, 2008  
            Percent     Interest     Average  
    Average     of Total     Income/     Yield/  
    Balance     Assets     Expense     Rate  
ASSETS
                               
Loans (1) (2) (3)
  $ 1,191,904,958       82.24 %   $ 18,675,103       6.23 %
Investment securities:
                               
Taxable
    144,600,823       9.98       1,636,351       4.50  
Exempt from Federal income taxes (3)
    37,877,908       2.61       530,220       5.57  
Short-term investments
    8,358,876       0.58       51,471       2.45  
 
                         
Total earning assets
    1,382,742,565       95.41       20,893,145       6.01  
 
                       
Nonearning assets:
                               
Cash and due from banks
    13,045,160       0.90                  
Reserve for possible loan losses
    (13,092,284 )     (0.90 )                
Premises and equipment
    44,776,852       3.09                  
Other assets
    24,132,986       1.66                  
Available-for-sale investment market valuation
    (2,318,941 )     (0.16 )                
 
                           
Total nonearning assets
    66,543,773       4.59                  
 
                           
Total assets
  $ 1,449,286,338       100.00 %                
 
                           
LIABILITIES
                               
Interest-bearing liabilities
                               
Interest-bearing transaction accounts
  $ 161,183,261       11.12 %     875,197       2.16 %
Savings
    47,548,423       3.28       181,987       1.52  
Time deposits of $100,000 or more
    375,945,922       25.94       3,488,393       3.69  
Other time deposits
    429,763,468       29.65       4,117,346       3.81  
 
                         
Total interest-bearing deposits
    1,014,441,074       69.99       8,662,923       3.40  
Long-term borrowings
    145,021,740       10.01       1,375,939       3.77  
Funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements
    89,676,651       6.19       571,906       2.54  
 
                         
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    1,249,139,465       86.19       10,610,768       3.38  
 
                           
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    58,414,574       4.03                  
Other liabilities
    5,012,265       0.35                  
 
                           
Total liabilities
    1,312,566,304       90.57                  
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    136,720,034       9.43                  
 
                           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 1,449,286,338       100.00 %                
 
                           
Net interest income
                  $ 10,282,377          
 
                             
Net yield on earning assets
                            2.96 %
 
                             
(continued)

23


Table of Contents

                                 
    Quarter Ended September 30, 2007  
            Percent     Interest     Average  
    Average     of Total     Income/     Yield/  
    Balance     Assets     Expense     Rate  
ASSETS
                               
Loans (1) (2) (3)
  $ 803,079,558       77.76 %   $ 14,454,674       7.14 %
Investment securities:
                               
Taxable
    136,710,657       13.24       1,636,356       4.75  
Exempt from Federal income taxes (3)
    38,543,387       3.73       472,241       4.86  
Short-term investments
    1,869,221       0.19       34,568       7.34  
 
                         
Total earning assets
    980,202,823       94.92       16,597,839       6.72  
 
                       
Nonearning assets:
                               
Cash and due from banks
    10,721,633       1.04                  
Reserve for possible loan losses
    (7,738,045 )     (0.75 )                
Premises and equipment
    40,360,578       3.91                  
Other assets
    10,841,953       1.04                  
Available-for-sale investment market valuation
    (1,684,677 )     (0.16 )                
 
                           
Total nonearning assets
    52,501,442       5.08                  
 
                           
Total assets
  $ 1,032,704,265       100.00 %                
 
                           
LIABILITIES
                               
Interest-bearing liabilities
                               
Interest-bearing transaction accounts
  $ 174,639,435       16.91 %     1,926,818       4.38 %
Savings
    59,654,478       5.78       439,850       2.93  
Time deposits of $100,000 or more
    211,946,138       20.52       2,693,732       5.04  
Other time deposits
    294,446,320       28.51       3,476,364       4.68  
 
                         
Total interest-bearing deposits
    740,686,371       71.72       8,536,764       4.57  
Long-term borrowings
    42,445,652       4.11       486,992       4.55  
Funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements
    57,607,906       5.58       751,558       5.18  
 
                         
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    840,739,929       81.41       9,775,314       4.61  
 
                           
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    47,582,506       4.61                  
Other liabilities
    6,487,530       0.63                  
 
                           
Total liabilities
    894,809,965       86.65                  
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    137,894,300       13.35                  
 
                           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 1,032,704,265       100.00 %                
 
                           
Net interest income
                  $ 6,822,525          
 
                             
Net yield on earning assets
                            2.76 %
 
                             
 
(1)   Interest includes loan fees, recorded as discussed in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007, included in our Form 10-K, which was filed March 28, 2008.
 
(2)   Average balances include nonaccrual loans. The income on such loans is included in interest, but is recognized only upon receipt.
 
(3)   Interest yields are presented on a tax-equivalent basis. Nontaxable income has been adjusted upward by the amount of Federal income tax that would have been paid if the income had been taxed at a rate of 34%, adjusted downward by the disallowance of the interest cost to carry nontaxable loans and securities.
Risk Management
Management’s objective in structuring the balance sheet is to maximize the return on average assets while minimizing the associated risks. The major risks concerning the Company are credit, liquidity and interest rate risks. The following is a discussion concerning the Company’s management of these risks.
Credit Risk Management

24


Table of Contents

Managing risks that the Company’s banking subsidiaries assume in providing credit products to customers is extremely important. Credit risk management includes defining an acceptable level of risk and return, establishing appropriate polices and procedures to govern the credit process and maintaining a thorough portfolio review process.
Of equal importance in the credit risk management process are the ongoing monitoring procedures performed as part of the Company’s loan review process. Credit policies are examined and procedures reviewed for compliance each year. Loan personnel also continually monitor loans after disbursement in an attempt to recognize any deterioration which may occur so that appropriate corrective action can be initiated on a timely basis.
Prior to 2007, the Company’s banking subsidiaries had incurred a minimal level of charge-offs, when compared with the volume of loans generated; however, during 2007, the Banks net charge-offs increased significantly, to $615,474, and have continued to increase in 2008. Net charge-offs for the first nine months of 2008 were $5,825,054, compared to $615,474 for the first nine months of 2007. Net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2008 were $2,083,464, compared to $161,614 for the third quarter of 2007. The Company’s banking subsidiaries had no loans to any foreign countries at September 30, 2008 and 2007, nor did they have any concentration of loans to any industry on these dates, although a significant portion of the Company’s loan portfolio is secured by real estate in the St. Louis metropolitan and southwestern Florida areas. The Company has also refrained from financing speculative transactions such as highly leveraged corporate buyouts, or thinly-capitalized speculative start-up companies. Additionally, the Company had no other interest-earning assets which were considered to be risk-element assets at September 30, 2008 and 2007.
In the normal course of business, the Company’s practice is to consider and act upon borrowers’ requests for renewal of loans at their maturity. Evaluation of such requests includes a review of the borrower’s credit history, the collateral securing the loan, and the purpose of such requests. In general, loans which the Banks renew at maturity require payment of accrued interest, a reduction in the loan balance, and/or the pledging of additional collateral and a potential adjustment of the interest rate to reflect changes in economic conditions.
The softening of the real estate market in the St. Louis metropolitan and southwestern Florida areas and the overall economic downturn have caused an increase in the Company’s non-performing assets of $16,482,521 (158.05%) to $26,911,521 at September 30, 2008 from $10,429,000 at September 30, 2007. At September 30, 2008 and 2007, nonperforming loans totaled $15,258,135 and $8,817,000, respectively, comprised of nonaccrual loans of $14,595,718 and $8,414,000, respectively, and loans 90 days delinquent and still accruing interest of $662,417 and $403,000, respectively.
Nonperforming loans are defined as loans on non-accrual status, loans 90 days or more past due but still accruing, and restructured loans. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments, unless the loans are well secured and in process of collection. Additionally, whenever management becomes aware of facts or circumstances that may adversely impact the collectibility of principal or interest on loans, it is management’s practice to place such loans on non-accrual status immediately, rather than delaying such action until the loans become 90 days past due. Previously accrued and uncollected interest on such loans is reversed and income is recorded only to the extent that interest payments are subsequently received in cash and a determination has been made that the principal balance of the loan is collectible. If collectibility of the principal is in doubt, payments received are applied to loan principal.
Loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing interest are also included in nonperforming loans. Loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing interest are classified as such where the underlying loans are both well secured (the collateral value is sufficient to cover principal and accrued interest) and are in the process of collection. Also included in nonperforming loans are “restructured” loans. Restructured loans involve the granting of some concession to the borrower involving the modification of terms of the loan, such as changes in payment schedule or interest rate.
At September 30, 2008, nonperforming loans have actually decreased $2,489,475 to $15,258,135, from $17,747,610 at December 31, 2007, the largest components of which were primarily comprised of the following loan relationships:
    Loans totaling approximately $5.6 million to entities controlled by a Florida real estate investor that were in default and for which foreclosure proceedings have commenced. These loans are secured by commercial real estate properties in southwestern Florida for which the values have continued to decline. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company wrote down these loans to liquidation value by charging the reserve for possible loan losses in the amount of $2,403,173 and transferring $3,108,000 to other real estate owned. During

25


Table of Contents

      the quarter ended September 30, 2008 the one remaining property with a value of $232,000 was transferred to other real estate owned.
 
    Approximately $1.7 million of loans categorized as “restructured debt” were carried as nonperforming loans during the quarter ended June 30, 2008. These loans are collateralized by three single family residences located in southwestern Florida. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company wrote down the value of these loans to 90% of appraised value by charging the reserve for possible loan losses in the amount of $560,908, based on current appraisals of the properties. The Company is working with the borrower to move these properties as quickly as possible. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement with the borrowers of these properties and transferred $1.2 million to other real estate owned.
 
    A loan totaling $6.4 million representing a participation purchased is in the process of foreclosure. The loan is collateralized by a construction condominium development in southwestern Florida. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the company wrote down the value of this loan by charging $1,546,372 to the reserve for possible loan losses. Based on an internal review of the costs and status of the development, the Company has allocated an additional $232,000 of the reserve for possible loan losses for this loan relationship; which represents approximately thirty percent of the principal balance.
 
    During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company accepted a deed in lieu of foreclosure from a southwestern Florida home builder to settle loans outstanding. As part of this transaction, $667,000 was transferred to other real estate owned and a charge-off to the reserve for loan losses was taken in the amount of $211,000. Property transferred to other real estate owned included three single family residences and eight residential lots, all located in southwestern Florida. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company wrote down the value of these properties to 90% of appraised value resulting in an $189,050 charge to operations.
The Company also has nonperforming assets in the form of other real estate owned. The Banks maintained other real estate owned totaling $11,653,385 and $1,612,000 at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Other real estate owned represents property acquired through foreclosure, or deeded to the Banks in lieu of foreclosure for loans on which borrowers have defaulted as to payment of principal and interest.
During this period of a softening real estate market, the Company has sought to add loans to its portfolio with increased collateral margins or excess payment capacity from proven borrowers, and has often had to offer a lower interest rate on such loans to maintain the quality of the loan portfolio. Given the collateral margins maintained on its loan portfolio, including the nonperforming loans discussed above, the Company believes the reserve for possible loan losses is adequate to absorb losses in the portfolio existing at September 30, 2008; however, should the real estate market continue to soften, the Company may require additional provisions to the reserve for possible loan losses to address the declining collateral values.
Potential Problem Loans
As of September 30, 2008, the Company had 18 loans with a total principal balance of $26,416,457 that were identified by management as having possible credit problems that raise doubts as to the ability of the borrower to comply with the current repayment terms. These loans were continuing to accrue interest and were less than 90 days past due on any scheduled payments. However, various concerns, including, but not limited to, payment history, loan agreement compliance, adequacy of collateral coverage, and borrowers’ overall financial condition caused management to believe that these loans may result in reclassification at some future time as nonaccrual, past due or restructured. Such loans are not necessarily indicative of future nonaccrual loans, as the Company continues to work on resolving issues with both nonperforming and potential problem credits on its watch list.
The Company’s credit management policies and procedures focus on identifying, measuring, and controlling credit exposure. These procedures employ a lender-initiated system of rating credits, which is ratified in the loan approval process and subsequently tested in internal loan review and regulatory bank examinations. The system requires rating all loans at the time they are made, at each renewal date and as conditions warrant.

26


Table of Contents

Adversely rated credits, including loans requiring close monitoring, which may not be considered criticized credits by regulators, are included on a monthly loan watch list. Other loans are added whenever any adverse circumstances are detected which might affect the borrower’s ability to meet the terms of the loan. This could be initiated by any of the following:
    Delinquency of a scheduled loan payment;
 
    Deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition identified in a review of periodic financial statements;
 
    Decrease in the value of collateral securing the loan; or
 
    Change in the economic environment in which the borrower operates.
Loans on the watch list require periodic detailed loan status reports, including recommended corrective actions, prepared by the responsible loan officer, which are discussed at each monthly loan committee meeting.
Downgrades of loan risk ratings may be initiated by the responsible loan officer, internal loan review, the Loan Committee, or senior lending personnel at any time. Upgrades of certain risk ratings may only be made with the concurrence of the Watch List Committee of the Board of Directors.
The Company’s loan underwriting policies limit individual loan officers to specific amounts of lending authority, over which various committees must get involved and approve a credit. The Company’s underwriting policies require an analysis of a borrower’s ability to pay the loan and interest on a timely basis in accordance with the loan agreement. Collateral is then considered as a secondary source of payment, should the borrower not be able to pay.
The Company conducts weekly loan committee meetings of all of its loan officers, including the Chief Operating Officer, Chief Lending Officer, and Chief Credit Officer. This committee may approve individual credit relationships up to $2,500,000. Larger credits must go to the Loan Committee of the Board of Directors, which is comprised of three Directors on a rotating basis. The Company’s legal lending limit was $36,024,884 at September 30, 2008.
At September 30, 2008 and 2007, the reserve for possible loan losses was $12,398,957 and $8,890,557, respectively, or 1.01% and 1.06% of net outstanding loans, respectively. The following table summarizes the Company’s loan loss experience for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Bank management believes that the diligent underwriting process implemented at the Company’s inception and consistently applied throughout the Company’s existence will allow for continued maintenance of adequate asset quality; however, the continued softening of the real estate market, particularly in Florida, has continued to challenge the Company.

27


Table of Contents

                 
    Nine-Month Periods  
    Ended September 30,  
(in thousands of dollars)   2008     2007  
Average loans outstanding
  $ 1,070,367     $ 736,408  
 
           
Reserve at beginning of year
  $ 9,685     $ 7,101  
Provision for possible loan losses
    8,539       2,405  
 
           
 
    18,224       9,506  
 
           
 
               
Charge-offs:
               
Commercial loans:
               
Real estate
    (2,710 )     (317 )
Other
    (30 )     (36 )
Real estate:
               
Construction
    (1,758 )      
Residential
    (1,291 )     (280 )
Consumer
    (19 )     (24 )
Overdrafts
    (38 )     (1 )
 
           
Total charge-offs
    (5,846 )     (658 )
 
           
Recoveries:
               
Commercial loans:
               
Real estate
    1       10  
Other
    9       19  
Real estate:
               
Construction
           
Residential
          13  
Consumer
    3        
Overdrafts
    8       1  
 
           
Total recoveries
    21       43  
 
           
Reserve at end of period
  $ 12,399     $ 8,891  
 
           
Net charge-offs to average loans
    0.54 %     0.08 %
 
           
Ending reserve to net outstanding loans at end of period
    1.01 %     1.06 %
 
           
Loans charged off are subject to continuous review, and specific efforts are taken to achieve maximum recovery of principal, accrued interest, and related expenses.
In determining the reserve and the related provision for loan losses, three principal elements are considered:
    Specific allocations based upon probable losses identified during a quarterly review of the loan portfolio;
 
    Allocations based principally on the Company’s risk rating formulas; and
 
    An unallocated allowance based on subjective factors.
The first element reflects management’s estimate of probable losses based upon a systematic review of specific loans considered to be impaired. These estimates are based upon collateral exposure, using current fair values of collateral.
The second element reflects the application of our loan rating system. This rating system is similar to those employed by state and Federal banking regulators. Loans are rated and assigned a loss allocation factor for each category that is consistent with historical losses normally experienced in our banking market, adjusted for environmental factors and the Banks’ own historical experience (which until recently has been limited). The higher the rating assigned to a loan, the greater the allocation percentage that is applied.
The unallocated allowance is based on management’s evaluation of conditions that are not directly reflected in the determination of the formula and specific allowances. The evaluation of the inherent loss with respect to these

28


Table of Contents

conditions is subject to a higher degree of uncertainty because they may not be identified with specific problem credits or portfolio segments. The conditions evaluated in connection with the unallocated allowance include the following:
    General economic and business conditions affecting our key lending areas;
 
    Credit quality trends (including trends in nonperforming loans expected to result from existing conditions);
 
    Collateral values;
 
    Loan volumes and concentrations;
 
    Competitive factors resulting in shifts in underwriting criteria;
 
    Specific industry conditions within portfolio segments;
 
    Recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio;
 
    Bank regulatory examination results; and
 
    Findings of our internal loan review department.
Executive management reviews these conditions quarterly in discussion with our entire lending staff. To the extent that any of these conditions is evidenced by a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management’s estimate of the effect of such conditions may be reflected as a specific reserve allocation, applicable to such credit or portfolio segment. Where any of these conditions is not evidenced by a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management’s evaluation of the probable loss related to such condition is reflected in the unallocated allowance.
Based on this quantitative and qualitative analysis, provisions are made to the reserve for possible loan losses. Such provisions are reflected in our consolidated statements of income.
The allocation of the reserve for possible loan losses by loan category is a result of the above analysis. The allocation methodology applied by the Company, designed to assess the adequacy of the reserve for possible loan losses, focuses on changes in the size and character of the loan portfolio, changes in levels of impaired and other nonperforming loans, the risk inherent in specific loans, concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries, existing economic conditions, and historical losses normally experienced in our banking market for each portfolio category. Because each of the criteria used is subject to change, the allocation of the reserve for possible loan losses is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the trend of future loan losses in any particular loan category.
The total reserve for possible loan losses is available to absorb losses from any segment of the portfolio. Management continues to target and maintain the reserve for possible loan losses equal to the allocation methodology plus an unallocated portion, as determined by economic conditions and other qualitative and quantitative factors affecting the Company’s borrowers, as described above.
In determining an adequate balance in the reserve for possible loan losses, management places its emphasis as follows: evaluation of the loan portfolio with regard to potential future exposure on loans to specific customers and industries; reevaluation of each watch list loan or loan classified by supervisory authorities; and an overall review of the remaining portfolio in light of loan loss experience normally experienced in our banking market. Any problems or loss exposure estimated in these categories is provided for in the total current period reserve.
Management views the reserve for possible loan losses as being available for all potential or presently unidentifiable loan losses which may occur in the future. The risk of future losses that is inherent in the loan portfolio is not precisely attributable to a particular loan or category of loans.
The perception of risk with respect to particular loans within the portfolio will change over time as a result of the characteristics and performance of those loans, overall economic and market trends, and the actual and expected trends in nonperforming loans. Consequently, while there are no specific allocations of the reserve resulting from

29


Table of Contents

economic or market conditions or actual or expected trends in nonperforming loans, these factors are considered in the initial assignment of risk ratings to loans, subsequent changes to those risk ratings and to a lesser extent in the size of the unallocated allowance amount.
The Company has been in existence since 1999 and, while significant loan growth has been achieved, the Company has not yet been around long enough to have a sufficient historical base of charge-off data to fine-tune the unallocated reserve estimate. Accordingly, the Company has used benchmarks from other similar institutions. The unallocated reserve is based on factors that cannot necessarily be associated with a specific loan or loan category. Management focuses on the following factors and conditions:
    There is a level of imprecision necessarily inherent in the estimates of expected loan losses, and the unallocated reserve gives reasonable assurance that this level of imprecision in our formula methodologies is adequately provided for.
 
    Pressures to maintain and grow the loan portfolio with increasing competition from de novo institutions and larger competitors have to some degree affected credit granting criteria adversely. The Company monitors the disposition of all credits, which have been approved through its Executive Loan Committee in order to better understand competitive shifts in underwriting criteria.
While the Company has no significant specific industry concentration risk, analysis showed that over 90% of the loan portfolio was dependent on real estate collateral at September 30, 2008, including commercial real estate, residential real estate, and construction and land development loans. The Company has policies, guidelines, and individual risk ratings in place to control this exposure at the transaction level; however, given the volatile nature of interest rates and their affect on the real estate market and the likely adverse impacts on borrowers’ debt service coverage ratios, management believes it is prudent to maintain an unallocated allowance component.
Additionally, the Company continues to be committed to a strategy of acquiring relationships with larger commercial and industrial companies. Management believed it was prudent to increase the percentage of the unallocated reserve to cover the risks inherent in the higher average loan size of these relationships.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is a measurement of the Banks’ ability to meet the borrowing needs and the deposit withdrawal requirements of their customers. The composition of assets and liabilities is actively managed to maintain the appropriate level of liquidity in the balance sheet. Management is guided by regularly-reviewed policies when determining the appropriate portion of total assets which should be comprised of readily-marketable assets available to meet conditions that are reasonably expected to occur.
Liquidity is primarily provided to the Banks through earning assets, including Federal funds sold and maturities and principal payments in the investment portfolio, all funded through continued deposit growth and short-term borrowings. Secondary sources of liquidity available to the Banks include the sale of securities included in the available-for-sale category (with a carrying value of $178,331,285 at September 30, 2008, of which approximately $134,097,094 is pledged to secure deposits and repurchase agreements) and borrowing capabilities through correspondent banks and the Federal Home Loan Banks. Maturing loans also provide liquidity on an ongoing basis. Accordingly, Bank management believes it has the liquidity necessary to meet unexpected deposit withdrawal requirements or increases in loan demand.
The Federal Reserve Board established risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies, which require bank holding companies to maintain minimum levels of “Tier 1 Capital” and “Total Capital.” Tier 1 Capital consists of common and qualifying preferred stockholders’ equity and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill and 50% of investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries. Total capital consists of, in addition to Tier 1 Capital, mandatory convertible debt, preferred stock not qualifying as Tier 1 Capital, subordinated and other qualifying term debt and a portion of the reserve for possible loan losses, less the remaining 50% of qualifying total capital. Risk-based capital ratios are calculated with reference to risk-weighted assets, which include both on-and off-balance sheet exposures. The minimum required ratio for qualifying Total Capital is 8%, of which at least 4% must consist of Tier 1 Capital.

30


Table of Contents

In addition, Federal Reserve guidelines require bank holding companies to maintain a minimum ratio of Tier 1 Capital to average total assets (net of goodwill) of 3%. The Federal Reserve guidelines state that all of these capital ratios constitute the minimum requirements for the most highly-rated banking organizations, and other banking organizations are expected to maintain capital at higher levels.
As of September 30, 2008, the Company and Banks were each in compliance with the Tier 1 Capital ratio requirement and all other applicable regulatory capital requirements, as calculated in accordance with risk-based capital guidelines. The actual capital amounts and ratios for the Company, Reliance Bank, and Reliance Bank, FSB at September 30, 2008 are presented in the following table:
                                                 
                                    To Be a Well
                                    Capitalized Bank Under
                    For Capital   Prompt Corrective
    Actual   Adequacy Purposes   Action Provision
(in thousands of dollars)   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
                                               
Consolidated
  $ 149,410       10.75 %   $ 111,239       ³8.0 %   $ N/A       N/A  
 
                                               
Reliance Bank
    129,975       10.06 %     103,365       ³8.0 %     129,207       ³10.0 %
 
                                               
Reliance Bank, FSB
    23,256       24.03 %     7,742       ³8.0 %     9,678       ³10.0 %
 
                                               
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
                                               
Consolidated
  $ 137,011       9.85 %   $ 55,620       ³4.0 %   $ N/A       N/A  
 
                                               
Reliance Bank
    118,675       9.18 %     51,683       ³4.0 %     77,524       ³6.0 %
 
                                               
Reliance Bank, FSB
    22,443       23.19 %     3,871       ³4.0 %     5,807       ³6.0 %
 
                                               
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
                                               
Consolidated
  $ 137,011       9.44 %   $ 58,079       ³4.0 %   $ N/A       N/A  
 
                                               
Reliance Bank
    118,675       8.78 %     54,097       ³4.0 %     67,621       ³5.0 %
 
                                               
Reliance Bank, FSB
    22,443       20.06 %     4,409       ³4.0 %     5,511       ³5.0 %
 
                                               
Federal law provides the federal banking regulators with broad power to take prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of undercapitalized banking institutions. The extent of the regulators’ powers depend on whether the banking institution in question is “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized,” which are defined by the regulators as follows:
                         
    Total   Tier 1   Tier 1
    Risk-Based   Risk-Based   Leverage
    Ratio   Ratio   Ratio
Well capitalized
    10 %     6 %     5 %
Adequately capitalized
    8       4       4  
Undercapitalized
    <8       <4       <4  
Significantly undercapitalized
    <6       <3       <3  
Critically undercapitalized
    *       *       *  
 
*   A critically undercapitalized institution is defined as having a tangible equity to total assets ratio of 2% or less.
Depending upon the capital category to which an institution is assigned, the regulators’ corrective powers include: requiring the submission of a capital restoration plan; placing limits on asset growth and restrictions on activities; requiring the institution to issue additional capital stock (including additional voting stock) or to be acquired; restricting transactions with affiliates; restricting the interest rate the institution may pay on deposits; ordering a new election of directors of the institution; requiring that senior executive officers or directors be dismissed; prohibiting the institution from accepting deposits from correspondent banks; requiring the institution to divest certain subsidiaries; prohibiting the payment of principal or interest on subordinated debt; and ultimately, appointing a receiver of the institution. The capital category of an institution also determines in part the amount of the premium assessed against the institution for FDIC insurance. At September 30, 2008, Reliance Bank and Reliance Bank, FSB were considered “well capitalized.”
Contractual Obligations, Off-Balance Sheet Risk, and Contingent Liabilities
Through the normal course of operations, the Banks have entered into certain contractual obligations and other commitments. Such obligations relate to funding of operations through deposits or debt issuances, as well as leases for

31


Table of Contents

premises and equipment. As financial services providers, the Banks routinely enter into commitments to extend credit. While contractual obligations represent future cash requirements of the Banks, a significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval processes accorded to loans made by the Banks.
The required contractual obligations and other commitments at September 30, 2008 were as follows:
                                 
                    Over 1 Year    
    Total Cash   Less Than 1   Less Than 5   Over 5
    Commitment   Year   Years   Years
Operating leases
  $ 6,732,964     $ 152,687     $ 2,369,369     $ 4,210,908  
Time deposits
    834,548,844       609,662,277       194,632,525       30,254,042  
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
    149,000,000       19,000,000       60,000,000       70,000,000  
Commitments to extend credit
    288,866,860       106,272,766       104,354,362       78,239,732  
Standby letters of credit
    23,174,333       14,983,086       7,891,247       300,000  
Accounting Pronouncements
Several accounting rule changes that will or have gone into effect recently, as promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”), will have an effect on the Company’s financial reporting process. These accounting rule changes, issued in the form of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) or Interpretations include the following:
    In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes in financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 became effective and was implemented in 2007 by the Company; however, Company management believes that the Company maintains no uncertain tax positions for tax reporting purposes and accordingly, no FIN 48 liability is required to be recorded.
 
    In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“FAS No. 157”). FAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting standards, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FAS No. 157. In accordance with the FASB Staff Position 157-2, Effective Date of SFAS No. 157, the Company has not applied the provisions of FAS No. 157 to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities such as other real estate owned and goodwill. The Company uses fair value measurements to determine fair value disclosures. The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets recorded at fair value:
Investments in Available-For-Sale Debt Securities - Investments in available-for-sale debt securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company’s available-for sale debt securities are measured at fair value using Level 2 valuations. The market evaluation utilizes several sources which include observable inputs rather than “significant unobservable inputs” and, therefore, fall into the Level 2 category. The table below presents the balances of available-for sale debt securities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
         
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations
  $ 66,847,242  
Obligations of state and political subdivisions
    33,615,128  
Other debt securities
    4,831,760  
Mortgage-backed securities
    62,488,281  
 
     
 
  $ 167,782,411  
 
     
Loans - The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis other than loans that are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with Statement of FAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. At September 30, 2008, all impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the collateral is based upon an observable market price or current appraised value, and, therefore, the Company classifies these assets in the nonrecurring Level 2 category. The total principal balance of impaired loans measured at fair value at September 30, 2008 was $15,258,135.

32


Table of Contents

Part I — Item 3 — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Management of rate sensitive earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities remains a key to the Company’s profitability. The Company’s operations are subject to risk resulting from interest rate fluctuations to the extent that there is a difference between the amount of the Company’s interest-earning assets and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities that are prepaid or withdrawn, mature or are repriced in specified periods. The principal objective of the Company’s asset/liability management activities is to provide maximum levels of net interest income while maintaining acceptable levels of interest rate and liquidity risk and facilitating the funding needs of the Company. The Banks utilize gap analyses as the primary quantitative tool in measuring the amount of interest rate risk that is present at the end of each quarter. Reliance Bank management also monitors, on a quarterly basis the variability of earnings and fair value of equity in various interest rate environments. Bank management evaluates the Banks’ risk position to determine whether the level of exposure is significant enough to hedge a potential decline in earnings and value or whether the Banks can safely increase risk to enhance returns.
The asset/liability management process, which involves structuring the balance sheet to allow approximately equal amounts of assets and liabilities to reprice at the same time, is a dynamic process essential to minimize the effect of fluctuating interest rates on net interest income. The following table reflects the Company’s interest rate gap (rate-sensitive assets minus rate-sensitive liabilities) analysis as of September 30, 2008, individually and cumulatively, through various time horizons:
                                         
    Remaining Maturity if Fixed Rate;  
    Earliest Possible Repricing Interval if Floating Rate  
    3     Over 3     Over 1              
    months     months     year              
    or     through     through     Over        
    less     12 months     5 years     5 years     Total  
Interest-earning assets
                                       
Loans
  $ 422,578,720     $ 118,042,538     $ 611,326,331     $ 73,218,491     $ 1,225,166,080  
Investment securities, at amortized cost
    24,422,227       42,294,394       90,747,565       23,529,911       180,994,097  
Other interest-earning assets
    2,041,867                         2,041,867  
 
                             
Total interest-earning assets
  $ 449,042,814     $ 160,336,932     $ 702,073,896     $ 96,748,402     $ 1,408,202,044  
 
                             
Interest bearing-liabilities
                                       
Savings and interest bearing transaction accounts
  $ 207,571,700     $ 11,838     $     $     $ 207,583,538  
Time certificates of deposit of $100,00 or more
    129,860,277       182,432,236       61,277,925             373,570,438  
All other time deposits
    94,674,907       202,694,857       133,354,600       30,254,042       460,978,406  
Nondeposit interest-bearing liabilities
    80,560,040       24,654,571       60,000,000       70,000,000       235,214,611  
 
                             
Total interest-bearing liabilities
  $ 512,666,924     $ 409,793,502     $ 254,632,525     $ 100,254,042     $ 1,277,346,993  
 
                             
Gap by period
  $ (63,624,110 )   $ (249,456,570 )   $ 447,441,371     $ (3,505,640 )   $ 130,855,051  
 
                             
Cumulative gap
  $ (63,624,110 )   $ (313,080,680 )   $ 134,360,691     $ 130,855,051     $ 130,855,051  
 
                             
Ratio of interest-sensitive assets to interest- sensitive liabilities
    0.88     0.39     2.76     0.97     1.10
 
                             
Cumulative ratio of interest-sensitive assets to interest-sensitive liabilities
    0.88     0.66     1.11     1.10     1.10
 
                             
A gap report is used by Bank management to review any significant mismatch between the repricing points of the Banks’ rate sensitive assets and liabilities in certain time horizons. A negative gap indicates that more liabilities reprice in that particular time frame and, if rates rise, these liabilities will reprice faster than the assets. A positive gap would indicate the opposite. Management has set policy limits specifying acceptable levels of interest rate risk as measured by the gap report. Gap reports can be misleading in that they capture only the repricing timing within the balance sheet, and fail to capture other significant risks such as basis risk and embedded options risk. Basis risk involves the potential for the spread relationship between rates to change under different rate environments and embedded options risk relates to the potential for the alteration of the level and/or timing of cash flows given changes in rates. As indicated in the above table, the Company operates on a short-term basis similar to most other financial institutions, as its liabilities, with savings and interest-bearing transaction accounts included, could reprice more quickly than its assets. However, the process of asset/liability management in a financial institution is dynamic. Bank management believes its current asset/liability management program will allow adequate reaction time for trends in the marketplace as they occur, allowing maintenance of adequate net interest margins.
Bank management also uses fair market value of equity analyses to help identify longer-term risk that may reside on the current balance sheet. The fair market value of equity is represented by the present value of all future income streams generated by the current balance sheet. The Company measures the fair market value of equity as the net present value of all asset and liability cash flows discounted at forward rates suggested by the current Treasury curve plus appropriate credit spreads. This representation of the change in the fair market value of equity under different rate scenarios gives insight into the magnitude of risk to future earnings due to rate changes. Management has set policy limits relating to declines in the market value of equity. The results of these analyses at September 30, 2008 indicate that the Company’s fair market value of equity would decrease 4.1%, 3.9%, and 1.8%, from an immediate and sustained parallel decrease in interest rates of 100, 200, and 300 basis points, respectively, and decrease 5.6%, 12.0%, and 18.6%, from a corresponding increase in interest rates of 100, 200, and 300 basis points, respectively.

33


Table of Contents

Part I — Item 4T — Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, management has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective as of September 30, 2008.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

34


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Part II — Item 1 — Legal Proceedings
The Company and its subsidiaries are, from time to time, parties to various legal proceedings arising out of their businesses. Management believes that there are no such proceedings pending or threatened against the Company or its subsidiaries which, if determined adversely, would have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
Part II — Item 1A — Risk Factors
Other than the additional disclosure below, there have not been any material changes in the risk factors as disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Our wholesale funding sources may prove insufficient to replace deposits at maturity and support our future growth.
          Liquidity is essential to the Company’s business. Our liquidity could be impaired by unforeseen outflows of cash that may arise due to circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as general market disruption or an operational problem that affects third parties or us. The Company must maintain sufficient funds to respond to the needs of depositors and borrowers. As part of our liquidity management, we use a number of funding sources in addition to deposit growth and repayments and maturities of loans and investments. These funding sources include Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings, proceeds from the sale of loans, brokered certificates of deposit and secured lines of credit from other financial institutions and the Federal Reserve Bank. If we were to become less than “well capitalized,” as defined by applicable federal regulations, it would materially restrict our ability to acquire and retain brokered certificates of deposit. Additionally, adverse operating results or changes in industry conditions could lead to difficulty or inability to access these additional funding sources. Our financial flexibility will be severely constrained if we are unable to maintain our access to funding or if adequate financing is not available to accommodate future growth at acceptable interest rates. Finally, if we are required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to support future growth, our revenues may not increase proportionately to cover our costs. In this case, our operating margins and profitability would be adversely affected.

35


Table of Contents

Part II — Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
From July 1, 2008 through September 30, 2008, we issued the following 2,296 shares of our Class A Common Stock upon the exercise of options to purchase such Common Stock granted to certain executive and non-executive employees under various stock option plans and exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 505 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”).
                         
    Number of Shares Issued        
Date   Upon Exercise   Exercise Price   Proceeds
August 11, 2008
    10,000     $ 2.50     $ 25,000  
The table below contains information regarding the grant of stock options to purchase the Company’s Common Stock to directors, officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, generally pursuant to the Company’s Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plans during the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The grants of such stock and options were exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 505 promulgated under the Act.
                 
    Number of   Exercise   Date Exercisable/    
Date   Options   Price   Vested   Expiration Date
August 5, 2008
  10,000 Incentive   $7.50   August 5, 2009-1,667;   November 16, 2015
 
  Stock Options       August 5, 2010-3,334;    
 
          August 5, 2011-3,333;    
 
          August 5, 2012-1,666    
 
               
September 16, 2008
  500 Non-Qualified   $9.05   September 16,2009-250;   November 16, 2015
 
  Stock Options       September 16, 2010-250    
 
               
September 16, 2008
  5,000 Incentive   $8.30   Sept. 16, 2009-1,667;   November 16, 2015
 
  Stock Options       Sept. 16, 2010-1,667;    
 
          Sept. 16, 2011-1,666    
On July 1, 2008, the Company sold 5,206 shares of our Common Stock to officers and employees of the Company and our subsidiaries pursuant to our Employee Stock Purchase Plan pursuant to Rule 505 under the Act. Shares were sold at $5.95 per share, which was 85% of the closing sales price on June 30, 2008, totalling $30,976 in proceeds.
On August 5, 2008, the Company awarded 2,500 shares of our Common Stock to an employee in accordance with the employee’s initial employment arrangement pursuant to Rule 505 under the Act. The shares are subject to time vesting according to the following schedule: 1,000 shares vested on August 5, 2009 and 750 shares to vest on each of August 5, 2010 and 2011.

36


Table of Contents

Part II — Item 3 — Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Part II — Item 4 — Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders
None.
Part II — Item 5 — Other Information
(a)   None.
(b)   There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Company’s Board of Directors implemented since the filing of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
Part II — Item 6 — Exhibits
     
Exhibit    
Number   Description
 
31.1
  Chief Executive Officer’s Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
31.2
  Chief Financial Officer’s Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.1
  Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.2
  Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
  RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
 
 
  By:   /s/ Jerry S. Von Rohr    
    Jerry S. Von Rohr   
    Chief Executive Officer   
 
     
  By:   /s/ Dale E. Oberkfell    
    Dale E. Oberkfell   
    Chief Financial Officer   
 
Date: November 7, 2008

37