UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(MARK ONE) |
|
x |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES |
|
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 |
OR |
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES |
|
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (No fee required) |
Commission file number 0-10345
CACHE, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Florida |
59-1588181 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
1440 Broadway, New York, New York |
10018 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (212) 575-3200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: none
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock $.01 par value
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if
the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large Accelerated Filer o |
Accelerated Filer x |
Non-Accelerated Filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $218 million as of July 1, 2005, the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based upon the closing sale price of $17.02 of the registrants Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market on such date. Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer and director and by each person who owns 10% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily conclusive for other purposes.
As of February 28, 2006, 15,770,553 common shares were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain information included in the Registrants Proxy Statement to be filed in connection with its 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders has been incorporated by reference into Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15) of this report on Form 10-K.
CACHE, INC.
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2005
|
PAGE |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
||
|
7 |
|
||
|
10 |
|
||
|
12 |
|
||
|
13 |
|
||
|
13 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Market for the Registrants Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters |
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
||
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
16 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
||
|
24 |
|
||
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
||
|
29 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Item 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
|
29 |
|
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation |
|
29 |
|
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management |
|
29 |
|
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
|
29 |
|
Item 14 |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Except for the historical information and current statements contained in this Annual Report, certain matters discussed herein, including, without limitation, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results and timing of certain events could differ materially from those projected in or contemplated by forward-looking statements due to a number of factors including, without limitation, industry trends, merchandise and fashion trends, competition, changes in general economic conditions and consumer spending patterns, vendor procurement issues and the ability to obtain financing, any of which could cause actual results to differ materially.
We are a specialty retailer of social occasion sportswear and dresses targeting style-conscious women. We own and operate two separate store concepts, Cache and Lillie Rubin, each of which carries its own distinctive branded merchandise. Cache targets women between the ages of 25 and 45 while Lillie Rubin stores offer a more sophisticated line of social occasion apparel targeting women between the ages of 35 and 55.
Both store concepts focus on social occasion dressing designed for contemporary women. Our Cache and Lillie Rubin lines extend from elegant eveningwear to our distinctive day-into-evening sportswear, which encompasses a variety of tops, bottoms and dresses versatile enough to be worn during the day or evening. We operate 267 Cache and 39 Lillie Rubin stores (as of December 31, 2005) primarily situated in central locations in high traffic, upscale malls throughout the United States.
Our merchandising focuses on providing a selection of sportswear and dresses extending from elegant eveningwear to day-into-evening sportswear. As a result of our short lead time of four weeks to 12 weeks, we are able to employ a constant process of test-and-ordering that allows us to restock popular items during the same season. We also maintain a key item strategy, providing some popular and core items for longer periods to meet ongoing customer demand. New merchandise typically arrives on a weekly basis at each of our stores, giving our customers a reason to visit our stores frequently. We introduce new floor sets into each of our stores approximately every six weeks. These new floor sets allow exciting changes in visual merchandising within both our stores and our window presentations.
We design and market three general categories of merchandise:
Sportswear. Sportswear consists of related tops and bottoms, versatile enough to be worn during the day or out for evening affairs.
Dresses. Dresses range from special occasion long dresses to shorter lengths for cocktail and day-into-evening wear.
Accessories. Accessories consist primarily of jewelry, belts and handbags intended to complement our sportswear and dress selections.
These categories of merchandise differ in style depending on whether they are offered in our Cache or Lillie Rubin stores.
1
Cache. Caches average price points for sportswear range from $60 to $300, dresses range from $125 to $450 and accessories range from $30 to $150. The following table indicates the percentage of Caches net sales by merchandise category for each of the last three fiscal years:
|
|
52 Weeks |
|
53 Weeks |
|
52 Weeks |
|
||||||
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
||||||
|
|
December 27, |
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
Sportswear |
|
|
67.3 |
% |
|
|
69.1 |
% |
|
|
68.7 |
% |
|
Dresses |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
Accessories |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Lillie Rubin. Price points at Lillie Rubin are approximately 25% to 30% higher than at Cache. The following table indicates the percentage of Lillie Rubins net sales by merchandise category for each of the last three fiscal years:
|
|
52 Weeks |
|
53 Weeks |
|
52 Weeks |
|
||||||
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
||||||
|
|
December 27, |
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
Sportswear |
|
|
49.7 |
% |
|
|
58.1 |
% |
|
|
65.1 |
% |
|
Dresses |
|
|
44.9 |
% |
|
|
36.6 |
% |
|
|
29.6 |
% |
|
Accessories |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
The percentage of sales represented by dresses is typically higher in the first half of the year for both Cache and Lillie Rubin due to buying for the Easter, wedding and prom seasons. The percentage of Lillie Rubin sales represented by sportswear is expected to increase again in fiscal 2006, as a result of the increased presentation of our day-into-evening sportswear collection in all of our Lillie Rubin stores.
Design
Our apparel design and merchandising are organized around the spring and fall seasons. Our internal design and merchandising team is comprised of a designer, buyers who specialize in particular fashion classifications and executive management personnel. Following the end of a season, our design team reviews data from that seasons results as well as market research, retail trends, trade shows and other resources. Based on this information, our team develops seasonal themes, which will influence our exclusive designs for the following year.
Approximately nine to twelve weeks prior to a season, we begin to coordinate with external designers at our vendors to select specific styles that reflect seasonal themes. In collaboration with our vendors, Caches merchants adjust test garments for color and style to ensure offerings reflect the appropriate balance between fashion content and marketability. The team then works with its technical department, in-house fit model and manufacturers to guarantee its missy fit and high-comfort standards are met. The Companys strong relationship with its vendor facilitates a seamless design cycle that enables us to create innovative, exclusive styles and test merchandise in select stores before full-store roll-outs.
Accessories are designed and manufactured for Cache, by third party vendors, a process which allows our design and merchandising team to focus on its core apparel offerings. The Company maintains close relationships with these vendors, and accessories offerings are designed to complement seasonal themes and palettes.
2
Planning
We conduct our planning process based on our historical point-of-sale data, economic trends, seasonality and anticipated demand based on market tests. We determine at a corporate level the total number of stock keeping units and the composition by product, print, color, style and size. Our vendors are then able to negotiate bulk material purchase with their suppliers, which we believe enables us to obtain better pricing.
Our merchandising and planning teams determine the appropriate level and type of merchandise per store and communicate that information to our vendors who drop ship the merchandise to each store. Following receipt at our stores the merchandising staff obtains daily sales information and store-level inventory generated by our point-of-sale computer system. Based upon this data management teams make decisions with respect to re-orders, store transfers and markdowns.
In addition to introducing new merchandise, we employ a key item strategy whereby we maintain an inventory of core items in every store. This provides customers with a level of certainty that these items will be in stock when they visit, rather than rotating out of the store with merchandise changes. In certain situations, a store that is experiencing particularly strong sell-throughs relays the information to our management team and buyers, who in turn may add or adjust new merchandise in response to this feedback.
Sourcing and Distribution
We employ a sourcing and distribution strategy that enhances our speed to market, allows us to respond quickly to fashion preferences and demand, and reduces inventory risk. We purchase the vast majority of our merchandise from domestic vendors. Sourcing from domestic vendors provides us with short lead times ranging from 4 to 12 weeks from order to shipment, compared with typically much longer periods for sourcing from foreign vendors. Our five largest vendors accounted for approximately 37% of our purchases in fiscal 2005, and our largest vendor accounted for 21% of our purchases during this period.
Nearly all of our merchandise is drop shipped directly by our vendors to our individual stores rather than sent to a warehouse or distribution center. Drop shipping significantly decreases our distribution expenses and reduces the time required to deliver merchandise to our stores. If a customer requests an item out of stock at a specific store, we can ship the merchandise from another store to the customer by overnight or common carrier, the cost of which typically is borne by the customer.
Store Design and Environment
Most of our stores range in size from approximately 1,500 to 2,500 square feet, with our typical store averaging approximately 2,000 square feet. We believe that our relatively smaller store size enables us to create a boutique-like atmosphere by providing a more intimate shopping environment and a higher level of customer service than department stores. Most of our stores are open during the same hours as the malls in which they are located, typically seven days and six nights a week.
We continue to implement our new store designs and layouts for both our Cache and Lillie Rubin stores to enhance their appeal to the customer, increase access to merchandise, facilitate movement throughout the store and improve our displays. Our new store design emphasizes a modern, sophisticated and well-lit atmosphere with streamlined exteriors and sleek interiors. In addition, at Cache we have moved the dressing rooms from the middle of the store to the rear, and check-out locations from the front of the store to the side. This eliminates barriers to movement throughout the store and permits greater flexibility in merchandise displays, allowing us to more effectively market our clothing.
3
We began to remodel existing stores using this new design during late fiscal 2001. We remodeled 20 Cache and two Lillie Rubin stores in fiscal 2005 and expect to remodel approximately 25 stores in fiscal 2006 and 30 stores in fiscal 2007, as leases come up for renewal. Most store remodels take from four to six weeks. During this period, we typically utilize temporary locations in the mall near the existing location so that customers can continue to shop for our merchandise.
Store Management and Training
We organize our stores into regions and districts, which are overseen by four regional vice presidents and 34 district managers, with each of our district managers typically responsible for eight to 12 stores. We typically staff our stores with two opening employees, three mid-day employees and two closing employees.
We seek to provide our customers with superior customer service. To promote this part of our strategy, store managers and co-managers receive both salaries and performance-based bonuses. We pay sales associates and assistant managers on an hourly basis as well as performance incentives. From time to time, we offer additional incentives, such as sales contests, to both management and sales associates. Additionally, we place special emphasis on the recruitment of fashion-conscious and career-oriented sales personnel. We train most new store managers in designated training stores and train most other new store sales personnel on the job.
As of December 31, 2005 we operated 306 stores located in 43 states, as well as in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Of these 267 were Cache stores and 39 were Lillie Rubin stores. The following tables indicate our stores by location:
Cache stores:
Alabama |
|
5 |
|
Louisiana |
|
5 |
|
Oklahoma |
|
2 |
Arizona |
|
4 |
|
Maryland |
|
7 |
|
Oregon |
|
2 |
Arkansas |
|
1 |
|
Massachusetts |
|
8 |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
7 |
California |
|
29 |
|
Michigan |
|
6 |
|
Rhode Island |
|
2 |
Colorado |
|
4 |
|
Minnesota |
|
2 |
|
South Carolina |
|
5 |
Connecticut |
|
4 |
|
Mississippi |
|
1 |
|
Tennessee |
|
6 |
Delaware |
|
1 |
|
Missouri |
|
3 |
|
Texas |
|
22 |
Florida |
|
35 |
|
Nebraska |
|
2 |
|
Utah |
|
1 |
Georgia |
|
9 |
|
Nevada |
|
6 |
|
Vermont |
|
1 |
Hawaii |
|
2 |
|
New Hampshire |
|
3 |
|
Virginia |
|
7 |
Illinois |
|
9 |
|
New Jersey |
|
12 |
|
Washington |
|
5 |
Indiana |
|
2 |
|
New Mexico |
|
2 |
|
West Virginia |
|
1 |
Iowa |
|
2 |
|
New York |
|
14 |
|
Wisconsin |
|
3 |
Kansas |
|
2 |
|
North Carolina |
|
8 |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
1 |
Kentucky |
|
3 |
|
Ohio |
|
10 |
|
Virgin Islands |
|
1 |
Lillie Rubin stores:
Alabama |
|
1 |
|
Louisiana |
|
1 |
|
North Carolina |
|
1 |
Arizona |
|
1 |
|
Maryland |
|
1 |
|
Ohio |
|
1 |
Colorado |
|
1 |
|
Michigan |
|
2 |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
2 |
Florida |
|
11 |
|
Minnesota |
|
1 |
|
Tennessee |
|
1 |
Georgia |
|
2 |
|
Nevada |
|
1 |
|
Texas |
|
4 |
Illinois |
|
2 |
|
New Jersey |
|
1 |
|
Virginia |
|
2 |
Indiana |
|
1 |
|
New York |
|
1 |
|
Washington |
|
1 |
4
The following table indicates the number of stores opened and closed over the past five fiscal years:
|
|
Stores |
|
Stores |
|
Stores |
|
Stores |
|
|
|
Total |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Cache |
|
L.R. |
|
Cache |
|
L.R. |
|
Cache |
|
L.R. |
|
Totals |
|
Footage |
|
||||||||||||||||
2001 |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
460,000 |
|
||
2002 |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
478,000 |
|
||
2003 |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
514,000 |
|
||
2004 |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
596,000 |
|
||
2005 |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
614,000 |
|
||
New Store Development
We continually review potential new locations for Cache and Lillie Rubin stores. We locate our new stores primarily in upscale shopping malls. When selecting a new site, we target high traffic locations with suitable demographics and favorable lease economics. When evaluating a new site, we also look at the principal and anchor stores in the mall, location of our store within the mall and other specialty stores located in the mall.
We recently expanded to a number of street and lifestyle locations. We believe these stores can enhance our potential store base. These stores have generated faster sales growth and higher profitability. We plan to expand this program in fiscal 2006.
During fiscal 2005, we opened 17 Cache stores and 2 Lillie Rubin stores and closed 4 Cache stores. In fiscal 2006, we intend to open approximately 25 stores consisting of 20 Cache and 5 Lillie Rubin stores. In January 2006, we closed 5 Cache stores and 1 Lillie Rubin store, as part of our ongoing efforts to enhance store productivity. In fiscal 2007, we intend to open approximately 30 stores, consisting of 20 Cache and 10 Lillie Rubin stores. Currently 36 of our Lillie Rubin stores are located in malls that also contain Cache stores, and we intend to locate the substantial majority of our new Lillie Rubin stores in malls containing Cache stores.
Historically, we conducted limited marketing and advertising, relying on our individual store displays, mall locations and word-of-mouth to attract customers. During fiscal 2004 and 2005, we used a variety of media to promote our Cache brand and increase sales, consisting primarily of advertisements in magazines such as Harpers Bazaar, Latina, Lucky, People and Vogue. We also selectively advertise in targeted markets, employing various media, such as outdoor billboards and buses, including a large campaign in Grand Central Station in New York. We expect to continue to increase our Cache advertising and marketing expenditures. In fiscal 2003, we launched a first-time advertising and marketing campaign for the Lillie Rubin brand. These increased marketing efforts for both Cache and Lillie Rubin continued in fiscal 2005 and are intended to attract new customers and increase sales to existing customers.
We use direct mail campaigns to both potential and existing Cache customers. Over the past several years, we have built a database of over 3.1 million preferred Cache customers from our point-of-sale information system and mail 10 to 12 promotions per year to our targeted customers. We have continued to rapidly expand the Lillie Rubin Preferred Customer database over the past year. Our preferred customer tracking system enables us to identify and target specific merchandise promotions targeted at individual customers. We also send e-mail notices to customers and intend to increase our use of e-mail promotions in the future.
Our Cache and Lillie Rubin brands are supported by visual merchandising, which consists of window displays, front table layouts and various promotions. This type of marketing is an important component of
5
our marketing and promotion strategies since our mall locations provide significant foot traffic. We make decisions regarding store displays and advertising at the corporate level, ensuring a consistent appearance and message throughout all our stores. In addition, we encourage store management to become involved in community affairs, such as participating in local charity fashion shows, to enhance brand recognition and meet potential customers.
We expect to launch our enhanced customer loyalty program during the second half of fiscal 2006, with the assistance of our new marketing agency and will gradually roll out the program to all our locations. The completion of our store POS system upgrade will allow us the ability to introduce this program to all our stores. The program will be marketed in-store, as well as online and in targeted advertising media.
We have operated a Cache website, www.cache.com, since August 1999. We continue to enhance features on this website, which allows customers to purchase merchandise online, view currently available styles and schedule private fittings of merchandise at any Cache store. We have seen an increase in sales at the website over the past three years, as website sales have increased from $1.3 million in fiscal 2003 to $1.9 million in fiscal 2004 and $2.4 million in fiscal 2005.
The market for womens social occasion sportswear, dresses and accessories is highly competitive. We compete primarily with specialty retailers of womens apparel and department stores. Our stores typically compete directly with other womens apparel stores located in the same mall or a nearby location. We believe our target customers choose to purchase apparel based on the following factors:
· Style and fashion,
· Fit and comfort,
· Customer service,
· Shopping convenience and environment and
· Value.
We believe that our Cache and Lillie Rubin stores and merchandise have advantages over our competitors in meeting these needs.
Cache has made an investment in technology to improve sales, gain efficiencies and reduce operating costs. Our information systems integrate all major aspects of our business, including sales, finance, distribution, purchasing, inventory control and merchandise planning. Our stores utilize a point-of-sale (POS) system with price look-up capabilities for both inventory and sales transactions. In addition, the rollout of a new POS system to all of our stores, with many enhanced features, was begun in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. We are also installing a wide area network as part of this upgrade. This new system will allow us to add functionality to our POS system with the ability to capture debit card transactions, centralize credit authorizations, centralize our customer database, improve promotion transactions handling, and speed up customer transaction time. In addition, we will begin to sell gift cards and use merchandise credit cards in early fiscal 2006.
We are the owner in the United States of the Cache and Lillie Rubin trademarks and service marks. These marks are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Each federal registration is renewable indefinitely if the mark is still in use at the time of renewal. Our rights to the Cache mark and Lillie Rubin mark are a significant part of our business. Accordingly, we intend to maintain these marks and the related registrations. We are unaware of any material claims of infringement or other
6
challenges to our right to use our marks in the United States, although we have successfully brought infringement claims against third parties in the past.
As of December 31, 2005, we had approximately 2,700 employees, of whom approximately 1,225 were full-time employees and 1,475 were part time employees. None of these employees is represented by a labor union. We consider our employee relations to be satisfactory.
We make available on our website, www.cache.com, under Investor Relations, free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, currents reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and Board of Directors Committee Charters are also available on our website, under Corporate Governance.
Our success depends on our ability to respond rapidly to ever-changing fashion trends and customer demands.
Customer tastes and fashion trends change rapidly. Our success depends in large part on our ability to anticipate the fashion tastes of our customers, to respond to changing fashion tastes and consumer demands, and to translate market trends into fashionable merchandise on a timely basis. If we are unable to anticipate, identify or react to changing styles or trends, our sales may decline and we may be faced with excess inventories. If this occurs, we may be forced to rely on additional markdowns or promotional sales to dispose of excess or slow moving inventory. This could also cause us to miss opportunities. Both of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we miscalculate fashion tastes and our customers come to believe that we are no longer able to offer fashions that appeal to them, our brand image may suffer.
Our growth will depend on our ability to successfully open and operate new stores. This may strain our ability to manage our business.
Our growth strategy depends on our ability to open and operate new stores on a profitable basis. Opening new stores is dependant on a variety of factors including our ability to:
· Identify suitable markets and sites for store locations,
· Negotiate acceptable lease terms,
· Hire, train and retain competent store personnel,
· Maintain a proportion of new stores to mature stores that does not harm existing sales,
· Foster current relationships and develop new relationships with vendors that are capable of supplying an increasing volume of merchandise,
· Manage inventory effectively to meet the needs of new and existing stores in a timely basis and
· Expand our infrastructure to accommodate growth.
7
We opened 24 new stores in fiscal 2003, 40 new stores in fiscal 2004 and 19 new stores during fiscal 2005. Additionally, we plan to open approximately 25 new stores during fiscal 2006 and approximately 30 new stores in fiscal 2007. We intend to continue to open a significant number of new stores in future years and to remodel many of our existing stores as their leases come up for renewal. Our proposed expansion will place demands on our operational, managerial and administrative resources. These increased demands could have a material adverse effect on our ability to manage our business. As we open more stores, our resources may come under greater strain and may prove to be inadequate. If we are unable to open new stores or remodel our existing stores as planned, or if our new stores are unsuccessful, it could have a negative impact on our financial performance. In addition, even if we are able to open new stores as planned, some of our newly opened stores may not be commercially successful, possibly resulting in their closure at a significant cost to us or a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
In addition, some of our new stores will be opened in areas of the United States in which we currently have few or no stores. The expansion into new markets may present competitive, merchandising and administrative challenges that are different from those currently encountered in our existing markets. Any of these challenges could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results in operations. To the extent our new store openings are in existing markets, we may experience reduced net sales volumes in existing stores in those markets.
We recently made changes to our business strategy that, if not successful, could hurt our profitability.
We have embarked on a number of strategic initiatives intended to improve our business and profitability. These initiatives include hiring new members of senior management, significantly increasing our advertising and promotional activities, transitioning to exclusively Cache and Lillie Rubin branded lines of apparel, increasing the number of store openings, remodeling existing stores and reducing the number of items carried in our stores and vendors from which we source. These initiatives have costs associated with them, and we cannot assure you that they ultimately will prove successful or result in an increase to our sales or profitability.
Fluctuations in comparable store sales and quarterly results of operations could cause the price of our common stock to decline substantially.
Our quarterly results of operations for our individual stores have fluctuated in the past and will continue to fluctuate in the future. Since the beginning of fiscal 2000, our quarterly comparable store sales have ranged from an increase of 13% to a decrease of 5%. We cannot assure you that we will be able to increase comparable store sales in the future over any given period. Our comparable store sales and quarterly results of operations are affected by a variety of factors, including:
· Fashion trends,
· Calendar shifts of holiday or seasonal periods,
· The effectiveness of our inventory management,
· Changes in our merchandise mix,
· The timing of promotional events,
· Weather conditions,
· Changes in general economic conditions and consumer spending patterns and
· Actions of competitors or mall anchor tenants.
If our future comparable store sales fail to meet the expectations of research analysts, then the market price of our common stock could decline substantially.
8
Our success depends in part on the efforts of our management team, several of whom are relatively new to our company.
Our success in implementing our business and growth strategies depends on the abilities and experience of our management team. If we were to lose the services of one or more members of this team, and in particular the services of Brian Woolf, our Chief Executive Officer, we may be unable to find a suitable replacement on a timely basis. This in turn could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Additionally, some members of our management team recently joined us and have been working together for a relatively short amount of time. It is possible that we will be unable to integrate the new members of our management to effectively and efficiently run our business. If we are unable to do so, it could frustrate the execution of our business strategy and hurt our profitability.
We may be adversely impacted at any time by a significant number of competitors.
The womens apparel market is highly competitive, fragmented and characterized by low barriers to entry. We compete against a diverse group of retailers, including traditional department stores, national and local specialty retail stores, internet-based retailers and mail order retailers. Many of our competitors, particularly traditional department stores and national specialty retail stores, are larger and have greater resources to expend on marketing and advertising campaigns. In addition, may of these competitors are already established in markets that we have not yet penetrated and have greater name recognition in general. We cannot assure you that we will continue to be successful in competing against existing or future competitors. Our expansion into markets served our competitors or entry of new competitors or expansion of existing competitors into our markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our sales fluctuate on a seasonal basis and are sensitive to economic conditions and consumer spending patterns, leaving our operating results particularly susceptible to changes in shopping patterns.
Our net sales and net income are generally highest each year during our fourth fiscal quarter (October, November, and December) and lowest in our third fiscal quarter (July, August, and September). Sales during any period cannot be used as an accurate indicator of our annual results. Any significant decrease in sales during the fourth quarter in a given year would hurt our profitability.
Our business is also sensitive to changes in overall economic conditions and consumer spending patterns. Our growth, sales and profitability may be adversely affected by unfavorable local, regional, national or international economic conditions, including the effects of war, terrorism or the threat of these events.
We rely on a relatively small number of vendors, and our success depends on maintaining good relationships with these vendors to source our products.
For fiscal 2005, we purchased approximately 37% of our merchandise from our top five vendors, with approximately 21% being purchased from one vendor. The terms of our relationships with our vendors generally are not contractual and do not assure adequate supply or pricing on a long-term basis. If one or more of these vendors ceased to sell to us or significantly altered the terms of our relationship, we may be unable to obtain merchandise in a timely manner, in the desired styles, fabrics or colors, or at the prices and volumes we need. This could hurt our sales and our ability to respond to changing fashion trends. In addition, we have been reducing the number of vendors with which we do business and anticipate continuing this process. As we continue to do so, the risks associated with a vendor ceasing to sell to us may increase.
9
Some of our merchandise purchased from domestic vendors is produced in foreign facilities. This subjects us to the risks of international trade.
Many of our domestic vendors utilize overseas production facilities. To the extent that our domestic vendors rely on overseas sources for a significant portion of their materials or products, any event causing a disruption of imports, including financial or political instability or trade restrictions in the form of tariffs or quotas or both, could negatively affect our business. These adverse impacts may include an increased cost to us, reductions in the supply of merchandise or delays in our manufacturing lead time.
We rely on third parties to distribute our merchandise. If these third parties do not adequately perform this function, our business would be disrupted.
The efficient operation of our business depends on the ability of our vendors to ship merchandise through third party carriers, such as United Parcel Service, directly to our individual stores. These carriers typically employ personnel represented by labor unions and have experienced labor difficulties in the past. Due to our reliance on these parties for our shipments, interruptions in the ability of our vendors to ship our merchandise or the ability of carriers to fulfill the distribution of merchandise to our stores could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to attract new customers to our stores depends heavily on the success of the shopping malls in which we are located.
All but a few of our existing stores are located in shopping malls. We cannot control the development of new shopping malls, the availability or cost of appropriate locations within existing or new shopping malls, or the success of individual shopping malls. A significant decrease in shopping mall traffic would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We may be unable to protect our trademarks and other intellectual property rights.
We believe that our trademarks and service marks are important to our success and our competitive position due to their name recognition with our customers. There can be no assurance that the actions we have taken to establish and protect our trademarks and service marks will be adequate to prevent imitation of our products by others or to prevent others from seeking to block sales of our products as a violation of the trademarks, service marks and proprietary rights of others. Also, others may assert rights in, or ownership of, our trademarks and other proprietary rights, and we may be unable to successfully resolve those types of conflicts to our satisfaction.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
10
Executive Officers, Directors and Key Employees
The following table sets forth information concerning our executive officers, directors and key employees:
Name |
|
|
|
Age |
|
Position |
||
Executive Officers and Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Brian Woolf |
|
|
57 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |
||
Thomas E. Reinckens |
|
|
52 |
|
|
President, Chief Operating Officer |
||
Margaret Feeney |
|
|
48 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
||
Arthur S. Mintz |
|
|
60 |
|
|
Director |
||
Andrew M. Saul |
|
|
59 |
|
|
Director |
||
Morton J. Schrader |
|
|
74 |
|
|
Director |
||
Gene G. Gage |
|
|
58 |
|
|
Director |
||
Other Key Employees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Victor Coster |
|
|
48 |
|
|
Treasurer and Secretary |
||
Lisa Decker |
|
|
44 |
|
|
Vice President, Marketing |
||
Clifford Gray |
|
|
50 |
|
|
Vice President, Construction |
||
Joanne Marselle |
|
|
45 |
|
|
Vice President, Planning and Distribution |
||
Caryl Paez |
|
|
45 |
|
|
Director, Information Technologies |
Executive Officers and Directors
Brian Woolf has served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board since October 2000. From March 1999 to October 2000, Mr. Woolf served as Vice President and General Merchandise Manager for The Limited. From 1995 to March 1999, Mr. Woolf served as Senior Vice President and General Merchandise Manager for Caldor. Mr. Woolf has held various management positions within the retail industry over the last 30 years.
Thomas E. Reinckens has served as President and Chief Operating Officer since October 2000. Mr. Reinckens joined our company in February 1987 and has held various positions throughout his tenure, most recently serving as Chief Financial Officer from November 1989 to October 2000 and Executive Vice President from September 1995 to October 2000. Mr. Reinckens has over 20 years of retail experience.
Margaret Feeney has served as Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer since May 2005. Ms. Feeney was promoted to Vice President of Finance in July 2001. Ms. Feeney has served in a variety of financial and operational capacities with us since 1992. Prior to joining us, Ms. Feeney served as Manager of Financial Analysis and Budgeting for Toys R Us and in various financial positions at Brooks Fashion Stores, a junior specialty chain. Ms. Feeney has 20 years of retail experience.
Arthur S. Mintz has served as one of our directors since September 2002. Mr. Mintz has served as the President of Bees & Jam, Inc., an apparel manufacturer, since 1971.
Andrew M. Saul has served as one of our directors since 1986. Mr. Saul also served as our Chairman of the Board from February 1993 to October 2000. Mr. Saul is a partner in Saul Partners, an investment partnership, a position he has held since 1986.
Morton J. Schrader has served as one of our directors since 1989. Mr. Schrader was the President of Abe Schrader Corp., a manufacturer of womens apparel, from 1968 through March 1989. Since 1989, he has been active as a real estate broker and is a principal of PBS Realty Advisors.
Gene G. Gage has served as one of our directors since September 2004. Mr. Gage is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer of Gage Associates, a firm which provides financial planning and
11
services to individuals and businesses. He is a certified public accountant, as well as a certified financial planner. He has over 30 years of financial experience.
Other Key Employees
Victor Coster has served as Secretary since July 1991 and as our Treasurer since July 2001. Mr. Coster is responsible for all treasury and tax matters. Mr. Coster joined us in February 1991, and has held various positions, most recently as Controller from February 1997 to July 2001. Mr. Coster has over 25 years of experience in finance and accounting and has been a Certified Public Accountant since 1981.
Lisa Decker has served as Vice President of Marketing and Advertising since 1998 and was our Director of Marketing from 1991 until 1998. She has over 20 years of experience in marketing, advertising, sales promotion and visual merchandising within the retail industry.
Clifford Gray has served as Vice President of Construction since 1999 and was our Operations Manager from 1991 to 1999. Prior to joining us, Mr. Gray served as Operations Manager with Kids R Us.
Joanne Marselle has served as Vice President of Planning and Distribution since 2000 and was our Director of Planning from 1990 to 2000. Prior to joining us, Ms. Marselle served at various times as a Planning and Distribution Analyst and a Merchandise Coordinator for both Country Road Australia and Ann Taylor. Ms. Marselle has over 20 years experience in the areas of planning and distribution.
Caryl Paez has served as Director of Information Technologies since he rejoined our company in 1999. From 1996 to 1999, he was Director of Information Technologies for Louis Vuitton Americas. From 1992 to 1996, he served as our Director of Management Systems and from 1989 to 1992, as our Manager of Point of Sales Systems.
All but a few of our 306 stores are located in shopping malls. The substantial majority of our stores contain between 1,500 and 2,500 square feet of space, with the typical store averaging 2,000 square feet. All of our stores are in leased facilities, and we typically negotiate our rental agreements based on our portfolio of store locations with a particular landlord rather than on an individual basis. Rental terms usually include a fixed minimum rent plus a percentage rent based on sales in excess of a specified amount. In addition, we generally are required to pay a charge for common area maintenance, utility consumption, promotional activities and/or advertising, insurance and real estate taxes. Many leases contain fixed escalation clauses. Most leases contain leasehold improvement reimbursements from landlords and/or rent holidays. In recognizing landlord incentives and minimum rent expenses, the Company amortizes the charges on a straight line basis over the lease term.
Our leases expire at various dates through 2019. The following table indicates the periods during which our leases expire.
Fiscal Years |
|
|
|
Cache |
|
Lillie Rubin |
|
Totals |
|
||||||
Present-2008 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
||
2009-2011 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
||
2012-2014 |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
||
2015-2017 |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
||
2018-2019 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
||
Totals |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
12
Our corporate office is a 20,000 square foot facility located at 1440 Broadway in New York City. We lease this space under a 10-year lease through 2013 at a rate of approximately $543,000 per year.
We contract for space in a warehouse in New York on an as-needed basis to serve as a staging area for new store inventories and fixtures.
We are party to various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of our business. Management does not believe it is reasonably possible that resolution of these matters will result in a material loss.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Cache, Inc. held its annual meeting of shareholders at its headquarters in New York, New York on November 10, 2005. Of the 15,752,553 shares outstanding as of the record date, 15,250,454 shares were represented by proxy at the meeting. Proxies were solicited by Cache pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. At the meeting, Caches shareholders voted on the following matters:
(1) Proposal to elect five directors to hold office for a one-year term and until their successors are elected and qualified.
|
|
For |
|
Withheld |
|
Andrew M. Saul |
|
14,696,096 |
|
554,358 |
|
Brian Woolf |
|
14,991,455 |
|
258,999 |
|
Gene G. Gage |
|
15,087,655 |
|
162,799 |
|
Arthur S. Mintz |
|
15,197,590 |
|
52,864 |
|
Morton J. Schrader |
|
15,062,563 |
|
187,891 |
|
(2) Proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte and Touche LLP as the Companys independent auditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
15,243,448 |
|
5,184 |
|
1,822 |
13
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
a. The principal market on which the Companys Common Stock is traded is the NASDAQ National Market System. The stock symbol is CACH. The price range of the high and low bid information for the Companys Common Stock during 2004 and 2005, by fiscal quarters, are as follows:
Fiscal Period |
|
|
|
Fiscal 2004 |
|
Fiscal 2005 |
|
||||||||
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
||||||
First Fiscal Quarter |
|
$ |
21.59 |
|
$ |
12.50 |
|
$ |
18.05 |
|
$ |
13.33 |
|
||
Second Fiscal Quarter |
|
$ |
23.63 |
|
$ |
13.39 |
|
$ |
17.69 |
|
$ |
10.90 |
|
||
Third Fiscal Quarter |
|
$ |
15.85 |
|
$ |
11.31 |
|
$ |
18.52 |
|
$ |
13.71 |
|
||
Fourth Fiscal Quarter |
|
$ |
18.53 |
|
$ |
13.69 |
|
$ |
19.09 |
|
$ |
14.47 |
|
Such over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
b. As of February 28, 2006, there were approximately 315 registered holders of record of the Companys Common Stock.
c. The Company has never paid cash dividends on its common stock. Payment of dividends is within the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors.
d. The following table summarizes our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2005:
Plan Category |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted average |
|
Number of |
|
|||||||
|
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
|||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
|
1,481,500 |
|
|
|
$ |
10.85 |
|
|
|
210,532 |
|
|
||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|||
Total |
|
|
1,481,500 |
|
|
|
$10.85 |
|
|
|
210,532 |
|
|
14
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following Selected Consolidated Financial Data should be read in conjunction with the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.
|
|
52 WEEKS ENDED |
|
53 WEEKS |
|
52 WEEKS |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
DEC. 29, |
|
DEC. 28, |
|
DEC. 27, |
|
JAN. 1, |
|
DEC. 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
(in thousands, except per share and operating data) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
NET SALES |
|
$ |
180,750 |
|
$ |
200,315 |
|
$ |
216,256 |
|
|
$ |
247,300 |
|
|
|
$ |
266,345 |
|
|
COST OF SALES |
|
117,201 |
|
116,490 |
|
120,731 |
|
|
135,745 |
|
|
|
144,984 |
|
|
|||||
GROSS PROFIT |
|
63,549 |
|
83,825 |
|
95,525 |
|
|
111,555 |
|
|
|
121,361 |
|
|
|||||
STORE OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
51,285 |
|
57,322 |
|
63,546 |
|
|
76,466 |
|
|
|
85,529 |
|
|
|||||
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
|
8,929 |
|
12,190 |
|
14,074 |
|
|
14,221 |
|
|
|
15,824 |
|
|
|||||
OPERATING INCOME |
|
3,335 |
|
14,313 |
|
17,905 |
|
|
20,868 |
|
|
|
20,008 |
|
|
|||||
OTHER INCOME, (net)(1) |
|
1,858 |
|
260 |
|
273 |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
5,193 |
|
14,573 |
|
18,178 |
|
|
21,327 |
|
|
|
21,080 |
|
|
|||||
INCOME TAX PROVISION |
|
1,895 |
|
5,632 |
|
7,089 |
|
|
8,030 |
|
|
|
7,675 |
|
|
|||||
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
3,298 |
|
$ |
8,941 |
|
$ |
11,089 |
|
|
$ |
13,297 |
|
|
|
$ |
13,405 |
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
BASIC |
|
13,637 |
|
13,650 |
|
14,256 |
|
|
15,589 |
|
|
|
15,726 |
|
|
|||||
DILUTED(2) |
|
13,844 |
|
14,448 |
|
14,721 |
|
|
16,004 |
|
|
|
16,150 |
|
|
|||||
STORE DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
NUMBER OF STORES OPEN AT END OF PERIOD |
|
222 |
|
234 |
|
255 |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|||||
AVERAGE SALES PER SQUARE FOOT(3) |
|
$ |
408 |
|
$ |
438 |
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
COMPARABLE STORE SALES INCREASE(4) |
|
0 |
% |
7 |
% |
3 |
% |
|
5 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|||||
TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE |
|
460 |
|
478 |
|
514 |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|||||
STATEMENT OF BALANCE SHEET AND OTHER DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
WORKING CAPITAL |
|
$ |
20,197 |
|
$ |
26,654 |
|
$ |
41,034 |
|
|
$ |
53,469 |
|
|
|
$ |
63,786 |
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
61,182 |
|
$ |
76,480 |
|
$ |
104,067 |
|
|
$ |
132,028 |
|
|
|
$ |
150,884 |
|
|
TOTAL LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
$ |
36,306 |
|
$ |
45,292 |
|
$ |
65,142 |
|
|
$ |
84,840 |
|
|
|
$ |
98,996 |
|
|
RATIO OF CURRENT ASSETS TO CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
2.03:1 |
|
2.07:1 |
|
2.41:1 |
|
|
2.75:1 |
|
|
|
2.91:1 |
|
|
|||||
INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO |
|
5.07:1 |
|
5.28:1 |
|
4.94:1 |
|
|
4.60:1 |
|
|
|
4.46:1 |
|
|
|||||
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES |
|
$ |
6,220 |
|
$ |
9,033 |
|
$ |
15,628 |
|
|
$ |
21,753 |
|
|
|
$ |
15,490 |
|
|
DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION |
|
$ |
5,247 |
|
$ |
5,519 |
|
$ |
6,395 |
|
|
$ |
8,232 |
|
|
|
$ |
9,779 |
|
|
BOOK VALUE PER SHARE |
|
$ |
2.66 |
|
$ |
3.32 |
|
$ |
4.35 |
|
|
$ |
5.42 |
|
|
|
$ |
6.28 |
|
|
(1) Other income in fiscal 2001 included $1,518,000 from the settlement of a trademark litigation claim undertaken against a third party, net of professional fees related to the lawsuit. Other income generally consists of interest income.
(2) Diluted weighted average shares for the fiscal years ended December 29, 2001, December 28, 2002, December 27, 2003, January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2005 include 207,000, 798,000, 465,000, 415,000 and 424,000, shares respectively, due to the potential exercise of stock options that were outstanding and exercisable during those years.
(3) Average sales per square foot are calculated by dividing net sales by the weighted average store square footage available.
(4) Comparable store sales data is calculated based on the net sales of stores open at least 12 full months at the beginning of the period for which the data are presented.
15
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We are a specialty retailer of social occasion sportswear and dresses targeting style-conscious women. We own and operate two separate store concepts, Cache and Lillie Rubin, each of which carries its own distinctive branded merchandise. Cache targets women between the ages of 25 and 45 while Lillie Rubin stores offer a more sophisticated line of social occasion apparel targeting women between the ages of 35 and 55.
Both store concepts focus on social occasion dressing designed for contemporary women. Our Cache and Lillie Rubin lines extend from elegant eveningwear to our distinctive day-into-evening sportswear, which encompasses a variety of tops, bottoms and dresses versatile enough to be worn during the day or evening. We operate 267 Cache and 39 Lillie Rubin stores (as of December 31, 2005), primarily situated in central locations in high traffic, upscale malls throughout the United States.
Fiscal 2005 represents the companys fifteenth consecutive profitable year.
The overall success of fiscal 2005 was not without challenges. The first half of fiscal 2005 was a pivotal period for the Company. We expanded our casual fashion assortments, while reducing our key item and dress business. These repositioning efforts created lower gross margins for the first half, gross profits as a percentage of net sales in the first half decreased to 44.3% from 46.0% in fiscal 2004. During the second half of fiscal 2005, our consumer responded well to the increased penetration of casual fashions versus basics. Also, we reduced the quantity per style being offered, which we believe created a greater sense of urgency for the customer. The second half gross profit margin increased to 46.8% in fiscal 2005 from 44.3% in fiscal 2004.
In fiscal 2006, the Company will focus on its sourcing strategy and has already hired an Executive Vice President of Production and Sourcing to lead this initiative. The merchandising team had in the past also been responsible for sourcing. We believe that having a separate area responsible for this integral process will enhance consistent flow and quality of product.
The company opened 19 stores in fiscal 2005, 17 Cache and 2 Lillie Rubin stores and closed 4 Cache stores. Operating cash flow funded all store openings. In fiscal 2006, we intend to open approximately 25 stores consisting of 20 Cache and 5 Lillie Rubin stores, also intended to be funded by operating cash flow. In fiscal 2005, the company remodeled 18 Cache stores and 2 Lillie Rubin, approximately 60% of the chain is now in the new format.
In Spring 2006, the Company intends to roll-out a new POS system to all locations. The new systems will allow the Company to then go forward with a customer loyalty program in late 2006, which will link to the Companys direct marketing.
The Company is optimistic about its opportunity for success in fiscal 2006. Management will continue to offer the consumer the most current fashion trends in a boutique setting with high levels of customer service.
16
We use a number of key indicators of financial condition and operating performance to evaluate the performance of our business, some of which are set forth in the following table:
|
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
53 Weeks Ended |
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
|||||||||
|
|
December 27, |
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
|||||||||
Operating Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total store count, at end of period |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|||
Net sales growth |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|||
Comparable store sales growth |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|||
Net sales per square foot |
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
Total square footage (in thousands) |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|||
Net sales. Net sales consist of sales from comparable stores and non-comparable stores. A store is not included in comparable store sales until the first day of the fiscal month following the twelfth full month of sales. Non-comparable store sales include sales generated at new stores prior to the period when they are considered comparable stores and sales generated from stores that we have since closed.
Shipping and handling. Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling fees are included in net sales at the time of shipment. Costs incurred for shipping and handling are included in cost of sales.
Cost of sales. Cost of sales includes the cost of merchandise, cost of freight from vendors, costs incurred for shipping and handling, payroll for our design, buying and merchandising personnel and store occupancy costs. Store occupancy costs include rent, contingent rents, common area maintenance and real estate taxes.
Store operating expenses. Store operating expenses include payroll, payroll taxes, health benefits, insurance, credit card processing fees, depreciation, licenses and taxes as well as marketing and advertising expenses.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses include district and regional manager payroll, other corporate personnel payroll and employee benefits, employment taxes, insurance, legal and other professional fees and other corporate level expenses. Corporate level expenses are primarily attributable to our corporate headquarters in New York.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which requires us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in our financial statements and related notes. Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results will inevitably differ from our estimates. Such differences could be material to the financial statements.
Our accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to the financial statements, located elsewhere in this document. We have identified certain critical accounting policies which are described below.
Inventories. Our inventories are valued at lower of cost or market using the retail inventory method. Under the retail method (RIM), the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross margins are calculated by applying a calculated cost to retail ratio to the retail value of inventories. RIM is an averaging method that had been widely used in the retail industry due to its practicality. Additionally, it is recognized that the use of RIM will result in valuing inventories at the lower of cost or market if markdowns are currently taken as a reduction of the retail value of inventories. Inherent in the RIM calculation are certain
17
significant management judgments including, among others, merchandise markon, markups, and markdowns, which significantly impact the ending inventory valuation at cost as well as the resulting gross margins. We take markdowns due to changes in fashion and style, based on the following factors: (i) supply on hand, (ii) historical experience and (iii) our expectations as to future sales. We do not anticipate any significant change in our markdown strategy that would cause a significant change in our earnings. We believe that our RIM provides an inventory valuation, which results in a carrying value at the lower of cost or market.
Finite-long lived assets. The Companys judgment regarding the existence of impairment indicators is based on market and operational performance. We assess the impairment of long-lived assets, primarily fixed assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:
· significant changes in the manner of our use of assets or the strategy for our overall business;
· significant negative industry or economic trends;
· store closings; or
· underperforming business trends.
In the evaluation of the fair value and future benefits of finite long-lived assets, we perform an analysis by store of the anticipated undiscounted future net cash flows of the related finite long-lived assets. If the carrying value of the related asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value is reduced to its fair value. Various factors including future sales growth and profit margins are included in this analysis. To the extent these future projections or strategies change, the conclusion regarding impairment may differ from the current estimates. No impairment charges were incurred in fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively.
Self Insurance. We are self-insured for losses and liabilities related primarily to employee health and welfare claims. Losses are accrued based upon our estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred using certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry and based on Company experience. Adjustments to earnings resulting from changes in historical loss trends have been insignificant for fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005. Further, we do not anticipate any significant change in loss trends, settlements or other costs that would cause a significant change in our earnings.
Revenue Recognition. Sales are recognized at the point of sale, which occurs when merchandise is sold in an over-the-counter transaction or upon receipt by a customer. Sales of merchandise via our website are recognized at the expected time of delivery to the customer. Our customers have the right to return merchandise. Sales are reported net of actual and estimated returns. We maintain a reserve for potential product returns and record, as a reduction to sales, a provision for estimated product returns, which is determined based on historical experience. Charges or credits to earnings resulting from revisions to estimates on our sales return provision were approximately $66,000, $20,000 and $(29,000) for fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling fees are included in net sales at the time of shipment. Costs incurred for shipping and handling are included in cost of sales.
Income Taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This statement requires the Company to recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using applicable tax rates for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company reserves for tax contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the
18
contingent amount is reasonably estimable. These reserves are based upon the Companys best estimation of the potential exposures associated with the timing and amount of deductions as well as various tax filing positions. Due to the complexity of these examination issues, $325,000 has been accrued to date.
Seasonality. We experience seasonal and quarterly fluctuations in net sales and operating income. Quarterly results of operations may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, including the timing of new store openings, fashion trends and shifts in timing of certain holidays. Our business is subject to seasonal influences, characterized by highest sales during the fourth quarter (October, November and December) and lowest sales during the third quarter (July, August and September).
The following table sets forth our operating results, expressed as a percentage of net sales.
|
|
52 Weeks |
|
53 Weeks |
|
52 Weeks |
|
||||||
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
||||||
|
|
December 27, |
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
Operating Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
55.8 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
54.4 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
45.6 |
|
|
Store operating expenses |
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
Other income (net) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
52 Weeks Ended December 31, 2005 (Fiscal 2005) Compared to 53 Weeks Ended January 1, 2005 (Fiscal 2004)
Net sales. Net sales increased to $266.3 million from $247.3 million, an increase of $19.0 million, or 7.7%, over the prior fiscal year. Fiscal 2004 net sales included a fifty-third week; on a comparable basis, assuming a fifty-two week year in both periods, total sales would have risen by approximately 10.0% in fiscal 2005. The actual increase in fiscal 2005 net sales as compared to fiscal 2004 reflects $10.1 million of additional net sales primarily due to a 4% increase in comparable store sales. Comparable store sales were higher in the second half of fiscal 2005, rising 5.4%, as compared to a 3.1% increase during the first half of fiscal 2005. This improvement resulted from a change in the merchandise assortment in the second half of fiscal 2005, to reflect a greater proportion of fashion-forward merchandise. The increase in full year fiscal 2005 sales was also partially attributable to the increase in accessory sales, which increased to 9.6% of total sales for Cache stores in fiscal 2005, from 8.6% of sales in fiscal 2004. The remainder of the increase in sales was the result of additional net sales from non-comparable stores and new stores. We believe our new store expansion, planned at approximately 25 new stores in fiscal 2006, will help to increase sales during the next fiscal year.
Gross profit. Gross profit increased to $121.4 million from $111.6 million, an increase of $9.8 million, or 8.8%, over the prior fiscal year. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit increased to 45.6% from 45.1%. This increase in gross profit was the combined result of higher net sales and an increase in gross profit margins, due to improved inventory management, which led to an increase in initial markup as compared to fiscal 2004. Partially offsetting the increase in gross margins was an increase in occupancy costs, which rose an additional 0.6% of sales in fiscal 2005 as compared to fiscal 2004, primarily due to the
19
increase in new stores opened in late 2004 and during 2005. We believe it generally takes three years for new stores to reach maturity levels, which provide positive leverage for occupancy costs. We estimate that excluding the fifty-third week from fiscal 2004 results, gross profit would have risen by an additional approximately 0.8% in fiscal 2005.
We will seek to increase gross margin rates in fiscal 2006 and beyond by establishing our own in-house production department. To that end, in March 2006 we hired a Vice President of Production and Sourcing, to assist in this effort.
Store operating expenses. Store operating expenses increased to $85.5 million from $76.5 million, an increase of $9.0 million, or 11.8%, over the prior fiscal year. This was due primarily to an increase in the total number of new stores open. As a percentage of net sales, store operating expenses increased to 32.1% from 30.9%, primarily due to an increase in payroll expense of $3.3 million, an increase in licenses and taxes of $1.0 million (rising to 1.7% of net sales in fiscal 2005, as compared to 1.4% in fiscal 2004) and an increase in depreciation expense of $2.8 million (rising to 3.5% of net sales in fiscal 2005, as compared to 2.6% in fiscal 2004). The increases in depreciation and taxes were partially attributable to the increase in new stores, as well as an increase in store remodels. Excluding the fifty-third week from fiscal 2004 results, we estimate that store operating expenses would have risen by approximately 1.5% in fiscal 2005. We anticipate that store operating expenses will decrease, as a percent of net sales in future years, as comparable store sales rise in our newer locations.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased to $15.8 million from $14.2 million, an increase of $1.6 million or 11.3% from the prior fiscal year. As a percentage of net sales, general and administrative expenses increased to 5.9% from 5.8%. This increase was primarily attributable to increase in corporate level payroll of $520,000, as well as an increase in incentive compensation expense of $680,000 (rising to 0.5% of net sales in fiscal 2005 as compared to 0.2% in fiscal 2004) and was partially offset by a reduction in travel expense of $297,000 (decreasing to 0.7% of net sales in fiscal 2005 as compared to 0.8% in fiscal 2004). Excluding the fifty-third week from fiscal 2004 results, we estimate that general and administrative expenses would have been 5.7% of net sales.
Other income. Other income increased to $1.1 million from $459,000, primarily attributable to higher average cash balances and higher interest rates in fiscal 2005, as compared to fiscal 2004. Other income generally consists of interest income. We expect interest income to grow in the future due to stronger cash flows from operations.
Income taxes. Income taxes decreased to $7.7 million from $8.0 million, a decrease of $355,000, below the same period last year. The overall effective tax rate decreased to 36.4% in fiscal 2005 from 37.7% in fiscal 2004. The decrease in the overall effective income tax rate is primarily attributable to a reversal of overaccrued state income taxes. An increase in tax-free interest from municipal bond investments in the first half of fiscal 2005 also contributed to the reduction in effective rate during fiscal 2005. Refer to Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details of the income tax provision.
Net income. As a result of the foregoing, net increased to $13.4 million from $13.3 million, as compared to the same period last year.
20
53 Weeks Ended January 1, 2005 (Fiscal 2004) Compared to 52 Weeks Ended December 27, 2003 (Fiscal 2003)
Net sales. The results of the Company for fiscal 2004 were favorably impacted by the extra reporting week. Net sales increased to $247.3 million from $216.3 million, an increase of $31.0 million, or 14.3%, over the prior fiscal year, for the 53 week period ended January 1, 2005 as compared to the 52 week period in Fiscal 2003. The one week of additional sales in Fiscal 2004 was approximately 2.7% of the total sales increase. The sales increase reflects $10.1 million of additional net sales as a result of a 5% increase in comparable store sales. The remainder of the increase was the result of additional net sales from non-comparable stores.
Gross profit. Gross profit increased to $111.6 million from $95.5 million, an increase of $16.1 million, or 16.9%, over the prior fiscal year. This increase was the combined result of higher net sales, partially due to the additional one week of sales in the Fiscal 2004 period and increased gross profit margins. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit increased to 45.1% from 44.2%. This increase as a percentage of net sales was primarily due to higher initial margins resulting from sourcing improvements.
Store operating expenses. Store operating expenses increased to $76.5 million from $63.5 million, an increase of $13.0 million, or 20.5%, over the prior fiscal year. As a percentage of net sales, store operating expenses increased to 30.9% from 29.4%, primarily due to the increase in stores opened over the past two years and an increase in marketing and advertising expenses of $1.8 million. Store operating expenses in Fiscal 2004 were also higher than Fiscal 2003, due to the additional one week period included in Fiscal 2004 results.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased to $14.2 million from $14.1 million, an increase of $147,000 or 1.0%, above the prior fiscal year. As a percentage of net sales, general and administrative expenses decreased to 5.8% from 6.5%, primarily due to lower incentive compensation expense in Fiscal 2004 costs. General and administrative expenses in Fiscal 2004 were also slightly higher than Fiscal 2003, due the additional one week period included in Fiscal 2004 results.
Other income. Other income increased to $459,000 from $273,000, in the prior fiscal year, primarily attributable to higher average cash balances and higher interest rates during fiscal 2004, as compared to fiscal 2003.
Income taxes. Income taxes increased to $8.0 million from $7.1 million, an increase of $941,000, over the prior fiscal year. This increase was attributable to higher taxable income, and was partially offset by a decrease in the effective tax rate from 39.0% in fiscal 2003 to 37.7% in fiscal 2004. The decrease in the overall effective income tax rate is primarily attributable to a reversal of state income tax over accrued in prior fiscal years.
Net income. As a result of the foregoing, net income increased to $13.3 million from $11.1 million, an increase of $2.2 million or 19.8%, over the same period last year.
Quarterly Results and Seasonality
We experience seasonal and quarterly fluctuations in our net sales and operating income. Our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, including the timing of new store openings, fashion trends and shifts in timing of certain holidays. Our business is subject to seasonal influences, characterized by highest sales during our fourth fiscal quarter (October, November and December) and lowest sales during our third fiscal quarter (July, August and September).
The following table includes our unaudited quarterly results of operations data for each of the eight quarters during the two-year period ended December 31, 2005. We derived this data from our unaudited quarterly consolidated financial statements. We believe that we have prepared this information on the
21
same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and that we have included all necessary adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, to present fairly the selected quarterly information when read in conjunction with our audited annual consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this document. The operating results for any particular quarter are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for any future period.
|
|
13 Weeks |
|
14 Weeks |
|
13 Weeks |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Mar. 27, |
|
June 26, |
|
Sept. 25, |
|
Jan. 1, |
|
Apr. 1, |
|
July 2, |
|
Oct. 1, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net sales |
|
|
$ |
57,194 |
|
|
|
$ |
62,087 |
|
|
|
$ |
49,430 |
|
|
|
$ |
78,589 |
|
|
$ |
62,793 |
|
$ |
66,970 |
|
$ |
57,262 |
|
|
$ |
79,320 |
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
25,688 |
|
|
|
29,149 |
|
|
|
19,596 |
|
|
|
37,122 |
|
|
27,133 |
|
30,366 |
|
26,113 |
|
|
37,749 |
|
|
|
||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
|
7,102 |
|
|
|
(961 |
) |
|
|
9,576 |
|
|
2,751 |
|
4,717 |
|
1,541 |
|
|
10,999 |
|
|
|
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
$ |
3,249 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,361 |
|
|
|
($521 |
) |
|
|
$ |
6,208 |
|
|
$ |
1,757 |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
$ |
1,107 |
|
|
$ |
7,541 |
|
|
|
|
As a Percentage of Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
Gross profit |
|
|
44.9 |
% |
|
|
46.9 |
% |
|
|
39.6 |
% |
|
|
47.2 |
% |
|
43.2 |
% |
45.3 |
% |
45.6 |
% |
|
47.6 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
(1.9 |
%) |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
4.4 |
% |
7.0 |
% |
2.7 |
% |
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
(1.1 |
%) |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
2.8 |
% |
4.5 |
% |
1.9 |
% |
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
Selected Operating Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Number of stores open at end of period |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
294 |
|
297 |
|
301 |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
||||||||
Comparable store sales increase (decrease) |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
1 |
% |
5 |
% |
8 |
% |
|
4 |
% |
|
|
||||||||
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our cash requirements are primarily for the construction of new stores and inventory for new stores as well as the remodeling of existing stores. We have historically satisfied our cash requirements principally through cash flow from operations. Cash flows have increased significantly in recent years, due to the dramatic increase in gross margin contribution.
As of December 31, 2005, we had working capital of $63.8 million, which included cash and marketable securities of $53.3 million.
The following table sets forth our cash flows for the period indicated (in thousands):
|
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
53 Weeks Ended |
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
|||||||
Net cash from operating activities |
|
|
$ |
21,810,000 |
|
|
$ |
22,983,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,482,000 |
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
($20,982,000 |
) |
|
($27,881,000 |
) |
|
($26,136,000 |
) |
|
|||
Net cash from financing activities |
|
|
$ |
5,772,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,859,000 |
|
|
$ |
559,000 |
|
|
Net increase (decrease), in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
$ |
6,600,000 |
|
|
($39,000 |
) |
|
($95,000 |
) |
|
During fiscal 2005, we generated $25.5 million in cash from operating activities due primarily to net income, depreciation of $9.8 million, an increase in accrued liabilities and compensation of $5.3 million, an
22
increase in accounts payable of $1.3 million, partially offset by a decrease of $1.0 million in deferred taxes and an increase in prepaid expenses of $2.8 million.
During fiscal 2004, we generated $23.0 million in cash from operating activities due primarily to net income, depreciation of $8.2 million, an increase in deferred taxes of $2.7 million, an increase in accounts payable of $2.7 million, an increase in accrued liabilities of $3.9 million and a tax benefit of $1.6 million from stock option exercises, which were partially offset by an increase in inventories of $5.6 million (primarily due to the net increase of 36 stores), reversal of deferred rent of $1.2 million, and an increase in receivables of $1.9 million.
During fiscal 2003, we generated $21.8 million in cash from operating activities due primarily to net income, depreciation of $6.4 million, an increase in accrued liabilities and compensation of $5.4 million, and an increase in accounts payable of $2.4 million and a tax benefit of $2.9 million from stock option exercises, partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $1.9 million and an increase in inventories of $4.7 million, primarily due to the net increase of 21 stores.
Cash used in investing activities was approximately $26.1 million in fiscal 2005, $27.9 million in fiscal 2004, $21.0 million in fiscal 2003. These amounts were used for the purchase of marketable securities, as well as the payment for equipment and leasehold improvements in new and remodeled stores. Our capital requirements depend primarily on the number of new stores we open, the number of existing stores we remodel and the timing of these expenditures. Projected capital expenditures for fiscal 2006 to fund new store openings and remodelings are approximately $16.0 to $18.0 million.
Based on our experience with new store openings, we estimate that the average net investment to open new stores is approximately $225,000 to $375,000, which includes new store opening expenses and initial inventory, net of landlord contributions. We estimate that the average net investment to remodel an existing store is approximately $200,000 to $300,000, net of landlord contributions.
Cash provided by financing activities was approximately $559,000 in fiscal 2005, primarily due to cash provided from the proceeds of common stock issuances. Cash provided by financing activities was approximately $4.9 million in fiscal 2004, primarily due to stock option exercises and stock issuances. During fiscal 2003, we received net proceeds of $5.8 million from stock issuances and stock option exercises.
We have a line of credit with Fleet Bank, N.A., permitting us to borrow up to $17.5 million on a revolving basis. At December 31, 2005, there was no outstanding balance under this credit facility. Amounts outstanding under the credit facility bear interest at a maximum annual rate equal to the banks prime rate, currently 7.50% at February 28, 2006, less 0.25%. The agreement relating to this facility contains selected financial and other covenants. In addition, the credit facility contains restrictions on our ability to make capital expenditures, incur indebtedness or create or incur liens on our assets. While this facility is unsecured, if a default occurs under the facility, we are required to grant the lender a security interest in our inventory and accounts receivable. We have at all times been in compliance with all loan covenants. This facility currently expires in November 2008.
We believe that cash flow from operations, our current available cash and funds available under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs and contemplated new store opening expenses for at least the next 12 months. If our cash flow from operations should decline significantly or if we should accelerate our store expansion or remodeling program, it may be necessary for us to seek additional sources of capital.
23
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following tables summarize our minimum contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2005:
|
|
Payments Due in Period |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Within |
|
2-3 Years |
|
4-5 Years |
|
After |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Employment contracts |
|
$ |
4,110 |
|
$ |
1,255 |
|
$ |
2,855 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Purchase Obligations |
|
38,222 |
|
38,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating leases |
|
188,625 |
|
25,859 |
|
48,547 |
|
44,622 |
|
69,597 |
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
230,957 |
|
$65,336 |
|
$51,402 |
|
$44,622 |
|
$69,597 |
|
||||
|
|
Payments Due in Period |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Within |
|
2-3 Years |
|
4-5 Years |
|
After |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Credit facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Standby Letters of credit |
|
969 |
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
969 |
|
|
$ |
969 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
We issue standby letters of credit primarily for the importation of merchandise inventories. The Company does not have any off balance sheet financing arrangements.
The operating leases included in the above table do not include contingent rent based upon sales volume, which represented approximately 0.8% of minimum lease obligations in fiscal 2005, or variable costs such as maintenance, insurance and taxes, which represented approximately 43.5% of minimum lease obligations in fiscal 2005.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our market risk relates primarily to changes in interest rates. We bear the risk in two specific ways. First, the revolving credit facility carries a variable interest rate that is tied to market indices and, therefore, the statement of income and cash flows will be exposed to changes in interest rates. As of December 31, 2005, we had no borrowing under our credit facility. However, we may borrow funds under the revolving credit facility, as needed.
The second component of interest rate risk involves the short-term investment of excess cash in short-term, investment-grade interest-bearing securities. These investments are included in cash and equivalents as well as marketable securities on our balance sheet. If there are changes in interest rates, those changes would affect the investment income we earn on these investments and, therefore, impact our cash flows and results of operations.
Recent Accounting Developments
See the section Recent Accounting Developments included in Note 1 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recent accounting developments and their impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Companys unaudited selected quarterly financial data is incorporated herein by reference to Note 12 to the Companys consolidated financial statements on page F-21. The Companys consolidated
24
financial statements and the report of independent public accountants are listed at Item 16 of this Report and are included in this Form 10-K on pages F-1 through F-22.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND/OR DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
During the two fiscal years prior to the fiscal year ended December 31,2005, (i) there were no disagreements with KPMG on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of KPMG, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its report, and (ii) there were no reportable events (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K). Please see our Report on Form 8-K filed February 15, 2005 for additional disclosure regarding our change in accountants.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(1) Disclosure Controls and ProceduresThe Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Companys reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as the Companys are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as of December 31, 2005, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Management identified a material weakness, due to an insufficient number of resources in the accounting and finance department, resulting in an ineffective review, monitoring and analysis of schedules, reconciliations and financial statement disclosures and several audit adjustments to the financial statements for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2005. Due to the pervasive effect of the lack of resources and the potential impact on the financial statements and disclosures and the importance of the annual and interim financial closing and reporting process, in the aggregate, there is more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual financial statements would not have been prevented or detected. Based on that evaluation, the Companys CEO and CFO concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2005.
(2) Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial ReportingManagement is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). A system of internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting,
25
management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework.
In performing this assessment, management reviewed the lack of resources in the accounting and finance department. As a result of this review, management concluded that the lack of resources resulted in an ineffective review, monitoring and analysis of schedules, reconciliations and financial statement disclosures, resulting in several adjustments to the current financial statements.
Management evaluated the impact of these adjustments on the Companys assessment of its system of internal control and has concluded that the control deficiencies that resulted from the lack of resources in the accounting and finance department, resulting in an ineffective review, monitoring and analysis of schedules, reconciliations and financial statement disclosures, represented a material weakness as of December 31, 2005. As a result of the material weakness in the Companys internal control over financial reporting, management has concluded that as of December 31, 2005, the Companys internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on the criteria set forth by the COSO of the Treadway Commission in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework. A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting is a control deficiency (within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Boards (PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 2), or combination of control deficiencies, that results in there being more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 2 identifies a number of circumstances that, because of their likely significant negative effect on internal control over financial reporting, are to be regarded as at least significant deficiencies as well as strong indicators that a material weakness exists, including the restatement of previously issued financial statements to reflect the correction of a misstatement.
The Companys independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued an attestation report on managements assessment of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. This report appears below.
(3) Remediation Steps to Address the Material Weakness
We are currently reviewing our remediation process for the material weakness described above. We may conclude to take one or more of the following actions:
i. Clearly define roles and responsibilities throughout the accounting/finance organization;
ii. Hiring additional resources;
iii. Institute a formal training of finance personnel;
iv. Conducting a review of accounting processes to incorporate technology enhancements and strengthen the design and operation of controls;
v. Implement process improvements to support timely reconciliation of all major balance sheet accounts on a monthly basis.
vi. Implement policies to ensure the accuracy of accounting calculations supporting the amounts reflected in our financial statements and to ensure all significant accounts are properly reconciled on a frequent and timely basis.
These remediation plans will be implemented during the second and third quarters of fiscal 2006. The material weakness will not be considered remediated until the applicable remedial procedures operate for a period of time, such procedures are tested and management has concluded that the procedures are operating effectively.
26
(4) Change in Internal Control Over Financial ReportingNo changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting has occurred during the Companys last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ BRIAN WOOLF |
|
March 17, 2006 |
Brian Woolf |
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
/s/ MARGARET FEENEY |
|
March 17, 2006 |
Margaret Feeney |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
27
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Cache, Inc.
New York, New York
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Cache, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, because of the effect of the material weakness identified by managements assessment based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the companys board of directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The Company identified and included in managements assessment a material weakness, due to an insufficient number of resources in the accounting and finance department, resulting in an ineffective review, monitoring and analysis of schedules, reconciliations and financial statement disclosures and several audit adjustments to the financial statements for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2005. Due to the pervasive effect of the lack of resources and the potential impact on the consolidated financial statements and disclosures and the importance of the annual and
28
interim financial closing and reporting process, in the aggregate, there is more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements would not have been prevented or detected. The material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, of the Company and this report does not affect our report on such consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 of the Company and the related financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15, and our report dated March 17, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |
New York, New York |
March 17, 2006 |
None.
The information called for by Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 is incorporated herein by reference from the definitive proxy statement to be filed by the Company in connection with its 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
29
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS and FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) |
|
1. |
|
The financial statements listed in the Index To The Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-2 are filed as a part of this report. |
|
|
2. |
|
Financial statement schedules are included on page F-22 or are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto. A Stockholder may obtain a copy of any of the exhibits included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K upon payment of a fee to cover the reasonable expenses of furnishing such exhibits, by written request to CACHE, Inc., at 1440 Broadway, 5th Floor, New York, New York 10018 Attention: Chief Financial Officer. |
3. |
|
Exhibits (10) |
3.1 |
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Company and all amendments thereto(2) |
3.2 |
|
Bylaws of the Company(1) |
10.1 |
|
Lease, dated July 28, 2003, between the Company, as Tenant, and New 1440 Broadway Partners, LLC, as Landlord, for the Companys offices at 1440 Broadway, New York, New York(10) |
10.2 |
|
1994 Stock Option Plan of the Company(3)(11) |
10.3 |
|
Form of Option Agreement relating to Options issued under the 1994 Stock Option Plan(4)(11) |
10.4 |
|
2000 Stock Option Plan of the Company(7)(11) |
10.5 |
|
Form of Option Agreement relating to Options issued under the 2000 Stock Option Plan(8)(11) |
10.6 |
|
2003 Stock Option Plan of the Company(9)(11) |
10.7 |
|
Form of Option Agreement relating to Options issued under the 2003 Stock Option Plan(10)(11) |
10.8 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement) dated as of August 26, 1996, between Fleet Bank, N.A. (Successor in interest to National Westminster Bank, New Jersey) and the Company(4) |
10.9 |
|
Security Agreement, dated as of August 26, 1996 (the Security Agreement), between the Company and Fleet Bank, N.A.(4) |
10.10 |
|
Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement dated August 10, 1998 between Lillie Rubin Fashions, Inc. and the Company(5) |
10.11 |
|
Master Amendment, dated July 19, 1999, to Revolving Credit Agreement and Security Agreement(6) |
10.12 |
|
Second Master Amendment, dated November 21, 2002, to Revolving Credit Agreement(10) |
10.13 |
|
Third Master Amendment, dated May 20, 2004, to Revolving Credit Agreement(10) |
10.14 |
|
Fourth Master Amendment, dated November 30, 2005 to Revolving Credit Agreement. |
10.15 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated February 8, 2006, between the Company and Brian P. Woolf(11) |
10.16 |
|
Employment Agreement dated February 8, 2006, between the Company and Thomas E. Reinckens(11) |
11.1 |
|
Calculation of Basic and Fully Diluted Earnings per Common Share |
12.1 |
|
Statements re: Computation of Ratios |
30
23.1 |
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP |
23.2 |
|
Consent of KPMG LLP |
31.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-18, dated December 29, 1980.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 15, 1993.
(3) Incorporated by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994.
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 1996.
(5) Incorporated by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 2, 1999.
(6) Incorporated by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2000.
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement filed on September 18, 2001.
(8) Incorporated by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2001.
(9) Incorporated by reference to the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement filed on October 6, 2003.
(10) Incorporated by references to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2003.
(11) Exhibits 10.2 through 10.7, 10.15 and 10.16 are management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements, which are required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 16(c) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.
31
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirement of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: March 17, 2006 |
CACHE, INC. |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
By: |
/s/ BRIAN WOOLF |
|
Brian Woolf |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
|
|
|
Title |
|
|
|
Date |
|
|
/s/ BRIAN WOOLF |
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
March 17, 2006 |
||||||
Brian Woolf |
|
|
|
|
||||||
/s/ THOMAS E. REINCKENS |
|
President |
|
March 17, 2006 |
||||||
Thomas E. Reinckens |
|
(Chief Operating Officer) |
|
|
||||||
/s/ MARGARET FEENEY |
|
Executive Vice President |
|
March 17, 2006 |
||||||
Margaret Feeney |
|
(Chief Financial Officer) |
|
|
||||||
/s/ GENE GAGE |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2006 |
||||||
Gene Gage |
|
|
|
|
||||||
/s/ ARTHUR S. MINTZ |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2006 |
||||||
Arthur S. Mintz |
|
|
|
|
||||||
/s/ ANDREW M. SAUL |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2006 |
||||||
Andrew M. Saul |
|
|
|
|
||||||
/s/ MORTON J. SCHRADER |
|
Director |
|
March 17, 2006 |
||||||
Morton J. Schrader |
|
|
|
|
32
CACHE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEX |
|
PAGE |
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
|
|
F-9 |
|
|
|
F-22 |
|
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Cache, Inc.
New York, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Cache, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the fiscal year then ended. Our audit also included financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2005, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 17, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on managements assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting and an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
March 17, 2006
F-3
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cache, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cache, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 1, 2005 and December 27, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 1, 2005. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cache, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 1, 2005 and December 27, 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 1, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
/s/ KPMG LLP
New York, New York
March 15, 2005
F-4
CACHE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents (Note 1) |
|
$ 16,848,000 |
|
$ 16,753,000 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
25,874,000 |
|
36,520,000 |
|
Receivables, net (Note 2) |
|
6,545,000 |
|
5,734,000 |
|
Inventories |
|
32,296,000 |
|
32,785,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net (Note 9) |
|
567,000 |
|
691,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
1,948,000 |
|
4,777,000 |
|
Total Current Assets |
|
84,078,000 |
|
97,260,000 |
|
EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS, net (Note 3) |
|
47,118,000 |
|
52,760,000 |
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
832,000 |
|
864,000 |
|
Total Assets |
|
$ 132,028,000 |
|
$ 150,884,000 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ 17,055,000 |
|
$ 18,404,000 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
1,927,000 |
|
2,624,000 |
|
Accrued liabilities (Note 4) |
|
11,627,000 |
|
12,446,000 |
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
30,609,000 |
|
33,474,000 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES (Note 7) |
|
13,556,000 |
|
16,309,000 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES, net (Note 9) |
|
3,023,000 |
|
2,105,000 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.01; authorized, 20,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 15,665,053 and 15,770,553 shares (Note 10) |
|
157,000 |
|
158,000 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
34,705,000 |
|
35,455,000 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
49,978,000 |
|
63,383,000 |
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
84,840,000 |
|
98,996,000 |
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ 132,028,000 |
|
$ 150,884,000 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
F-5
CACHE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
53 Weeks Ended |
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
December 27, |
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||||||||
NET SALES |
|
|
$ |
216,256,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
247,300,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
266,345,000 |
|
|
|||
COST OF SALES, including buying and occupancy (Note 8) |
|
|
120,731,000 |
|
|
|
135,745,000 |
|
|
|
144,984,000 |
|
|
||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
95,525,000 |
|
|
|
111,555,000 |
|
|
|
121,361,000 |
|
|
||||||
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Store operating expenses |
|
|
63,546,000 |
|
|
|
76,466,000 |
|
|
|
85,529,000 |
|
|
||||||
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
14,074,000 |
|
|
|
14,221,000 |
|
|
|
15,824,000 |
|
|
||||||
TOTAL EXPENSES |
|
|
77,620,000 |
|
|
|
90,687,000 |
|
|
|
101,353,000 |
|
|
||||||
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
17,905,000 |
|
|
|
20,868,000 |
|
|
|
20,008,000 |
|
|
||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Interest income |
|
|
259,000 |
|
|
|
439,000 |
|
|
|
1,071,000 |
|
|
||||||
Miscellaneous income (net) |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
||||||
TOTAL OTHER INCOME |
|
|
273,000 |
|
|
|
459,000 |
|
|
|
1,072,000 |
|
|
||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
18,178,000 |
|
|
|
21,327,000 |
|
|
|
21,080,000 |
|
|
||||||
INCOME TAX PROVISION (Note 9) |
|
|
7,089,000 |
|
|
|
8,030,000 |
|
|
|
7,675,000 |
|
|
||||||
NET INCOME |
|
|
$ |
11,089,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
13,297,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
13,405,000 |
|
|
|||
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|||
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
|||
BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING |
|
|
14,256,000 |
|
|
|
15,589,000 |
|
|
|
15,726,000 |
|
|
||||||
DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING |
|
|
14,721,000 |
|
|
|
16,004,000 |
|
|
|
16,150,000 |
|
|
||||||
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
F-6
CACHE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 28, 2002 |
|
9,100,150 |
|
$ 91,000 |
|
$ 19,609,000 |
|
$ 25,592,000 |
|
$ 45,292,000 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,089,000 |
|
11,089,000 |
|
Tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
2,933,000 |
|
|
|
2,933,000 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
881,000 |
|
9,000 |
|
5,819,000 |
|
|
|
5,828,000 |
|
Balance at December 27, 2003 |
|
9,981,150 |
|
100,000 |
|
28,361,000 |
|
36,681,000 |
|
65,142,000 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,297,000 |
|
13,297,000 |
|
Tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
1,583,000 |
|
|
|
1,583,000 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
472,125 |
|
5,000 |
|
4,813,000 |
|
|
|
4,818,000 |
|
Stock split |
|
5,211,778 |
|
52,000 |
|
(52,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005 |
|
15,665,053 |
|
157,000 |
|
34,705,000 |
|
49,978,000 |
|
84,840,000 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,405,000 |
|
13,405,000 |
|
Tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
105,500 |
|
1,000 |
|
590,000 |
|
|
|
591,000 |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
15,770,553 |
|
$ 158,000 |
|
$ 35,455,000 |
|
$ 63,383,000 |
|
$ 98,996,000 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
F-7
CACHE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
53 Weeks Ended |
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
||||||
|
|
December 27, |
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||||
Cash flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
$ 11,089,000 |
|
|
|
$ 13,297,000 |
|
|
|
$ 13,405,000 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6,395,000 |
|
|
|
8,232,000 |
|
|
|
9,779,000 |
|
|
Decrease (increase) in deferred tax assets |
|
|
916,000 |
|
|
|
2,705,000 |
|
|
|
(1,042,000 |
) |
|
Income tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
2,933,000 |
|
|
|
1,583,000 |
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
Amortization of deferred rent |
|
|
(835,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,221,000 |
) |
|
|
(940,000 |
) |
|
Change in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in receivables |
|
|
(1,937,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,931,000 |
) |
|
|
811,000 |
|
|
Decrease in notes receivable from related parties |
|
|
321,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in inventories |
|
|
(4,659,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,572,000 |
) |
|
|
(489,000 |
) |
|
Increase in prepaid expenses |
|
|
(219,000 |
) |
|
|
(709,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,829,000 |
) |
|
Increase in accounts payable |
|
|
2,374,000 |
|
|
|
2,693,000 |
|
|
|
1,349,000 |
|
|
Increase in accrued liabilities and accrued compensation |
|
|
5,432,000 |
|
|
|
3,906,000 |
|
|
|
5,278,000 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
21,810,000 |
|
|
|
22,983,000 |
|
|
|
25,482,000 |
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities |
|
|
(19,746,000 |
) |
|
|
(25,874,000 |
) |
|
|
(54,828,000 |
) |
|
Maturities of marketable securities |
|
|
14,392,000 |
|
|
|
19,746,000 |
|
|
|
44,182,000 |
|
|
Payments for equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
(15,628,000 |
) |
|
|
(21,753,000 |
) |
|
|
(15,490,000 |
) |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(20,982,000 |
) |
|
|
(27,881,000 |
) |
|
|
(26,136,000 |
) |
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
5,828,000 |
|
|
|
4,818,000 |
|
|
|
591,000 |
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
(56,000 |
) |
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
|
(32,000 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
5,772,000 |
|
|
|
4,859,000 |
|
|
|
559,000 |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents |
|
|
6,600,000 |
|
|
|
(39,000 |
) |
|
|
(95,000 |
) |
|
Cash and equivalents, at beginning of period |
|
|
10,287,000 |
|
|
|
16,887,000 |
|
|
|
16,848,000 |
|
|
Cash and equivalents, at end of period |
|
|
$ 16,887,000 |
|
|
|
$ 16,848,000 |
|
|
|
$ 16,753,000 |
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
F-8
CACHE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Cache, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the Company) owns and operates two chains of womens apparel specialty stores, of which 267 stores (as of December 31, 2005) are operated under the trade name Cache and 39 stores are operated under the trade name Lillie Rubin. The Company specializes in the sale of high fashion womens apparel and accessories in the better to expensive price range.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and use assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The most significant estimates made by management include those made in the areas of inventory; deferred taxes; contingencies; self insurance reserves; and sales returns and allowances. Management periodically evaluates estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for continued reasonableness. Appropriate adjustments, if any, to the estimates used are made prospectively based on such periodic evaluations.
The Company reports its annual results of operations based on fiscal periods comprised of 52 or 53 weeks, which is in accordance with industry practice. Results for fiscal 2004 includes 53 weeks. Results for fiscal 2005 and 2003 include 52 weeks.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of such items.
The Company considers all highly liquid investments that mature within three months of the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Marketable securities at January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2005 primarily consist of short-term United States Treasury bills. The Company classifies its short-term investments as held-to-maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are those securities in which the Company has the ability and intent to hold the securities until maturity. Because the Companys held-to-maturity securities mature within one year of the purchase date, the securities are classified as short-term marketable securities. Held-to-maturity debt securities are recorded at amortized cost, adjusted for the amortization or accretion of premiums or
F-9
discounts and such carrying values approximate fair value. A decline in the market value of any held-to-maturity security below cost that is deemed to be other than temporary results in a reduction in carrying amount to fair value. The impairment is charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established. Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related held-to-maturity as an adjustment to yield using the effective interest method. Interest income is recognized when earned.
Our inventories are valued at lower of cost or market using the retail inventory method. Under the retail method (RIM), the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross margins are calculated by applying a calculated cost to retail ratio to the retail value of inventories. RIM is an averaging method that had been widely used in the retail industry due to its practicality. Additionally, it is recognized that the use of RIM will result in valuing inventories at the lower of cost or market if markdowns are currently taken as a reduction of the retail value of inventories. Inherent in the RIM calculation are certain significant management judgments including, among others, merchandise markon, markups, and markdowns, which significantly impact the ending inventory valuation at cost as well as the resulting gross margins. We take markdowns due to changes in fashion and style, based on the following factors: (i) supply on hand, (ii) historical experience and (iii) our expectations as to future sales. We do not anticipate any significant change in our markdown strategy that would cause a significant change in our earnings. We believe that our RIM provides an inventory valuation, which results in a carrying value at the lower of cost or market.
Equipment and Leasehold Improvements
Equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which generally range from three to 10 years. For income tax purposes, accelerated methods are generally used. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their useful life or lease term.
The Company evaluates finite-lived assets in accordance with SFAS No.144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets (SFAS No. 144). This statement supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for Impairment of Long-lived Assets and for Long-lived Assets to Be Disposed of. Finite-lived assets are evaluated for recoverability in accordance with SFAS No. 144 whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset may have been impaired. In evaluating an asset for recoverability, the Company estimates the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss, equal to the excess of the carrying amount over the fair market value of the asset is recognized. The Company evaluated its finite-lived assets during fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005. Based on current and projected performance there was no fixed asset impairments in fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005, Management believes the carrying value and useful lives are appropriate.
We are self-insured for losses and liabilities related primarily to employee health and welfare claims. Losses are accrued based upon our estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred using certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry and based on Company experience. Adjustments to earnings resulting from changes in historical loss trends have been insignificant for fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005. Further, we do not anticipate any significant change in loss trends, settlements or other costs that would cause a significant change in our earnings.
F-10
Sales are recognized at the point of sale, which occurs when merchandise is sold in an over-the-counter transaction or upon receipt by a customer. Sales of merchandise via our website are recognized at the expected time of delivery to the customer. Our customers have the right to return merchandise. Sales are reported net of actual and estimated returns. We maintain a reserve for potential product returns and record, as a reduction to sales, a provision for estimated product returns, which is determined based on historical experience. Charges or credits to earnings resulting from revisions to estimates on our sales return provision were approximately $66,000, $20,000 and $(29,000) for fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling fees are included in net sales at the time of shipment. Costs incurred for shipping and handling are included in cost of sales.
The Company leases retail stores and office space under operating leases. Most leases contain construction allowance reimbursements by landlords, rent holidays, rent escalation clauses and/or contingent rent provisions. The Company recognizes the related rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term and records the difference between the amounts charged to expense and the rent paid as a deferred rent liability.
To account for construction allowance reimbursements from landlords and rent holidays, the Company records a deferred rent liability included in accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and amortizes the deferred rent over the lease term, as a reduction to rent expense on the consolidated income statements. For leases containing rent escalation clauses, the Company records minimum rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term on the consolidated income statement. The lease term used for lease evaluation includes option periods only in instances in which the exercise of the option period can be reasonably assured and failure to exercise such options would result in an economic penalty.
Costs associated with advertising are charged to store operating expense when the advertising first takes place. We spent $5,610,000, $7,373,000 and $7,695,000 on advertising in fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively.
Expenses associated with the opening of new stores are expensed as incurred.
Employees are eligible to participate in the Companys 401(k) plan if they have been employed by the Company for one year, have reached age 21, and work at least 1,000 hours annually. Generally, employees can defer up to 18% of their gross wages up to the maximum limit allowable under the Internal Revenue Code. We can make a discretionary matching contribution for the employee. Employer contributions to the plan for fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005 were $195,000, $205,000, and $227,000, respectively.
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This statement requires the Company to recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on
F-11
the difference between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using applicable tax rates for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company reserves for tax contingencies when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the contingent amount is reasonably estimable. These reserves are based upon the Companys best estimation of the potential exposures associated with the timing and amount of deductions as well as various tax filing positions. Due to the complexity of these examination issues, $325,000 has been accrued to date.
The Company periodically grants stock options to employees. Pursuant to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, the Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation arrangements using the intrinsic value method. If the options are granted to employees below fair market value, compensation expense is recognized. The Company has adopted the disclosure only provisions SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure, an Amendment of SFAS No. 123. If compensation cost for the Companys stock option plans had been determined in accordance with the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the Companys net income would have been (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
53 weeks Ended |
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
|||||||||
Net income as reported |
|
|
$ |
11,089,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
13,297,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
13,405,000 |
|
|
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under APB 25, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Deduct: Total stock based employee compensation determined under fair value based method of SFAS No. 123, net of tax(1) |
|
|
712,000 |
|
|
|
1,086,000 |
|
|
|
930,000 |
|
|
|||
Pro-forma net income |
|
|
$ |
10,377,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
12,211,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
12,475,000 |
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As reported |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
Pro-forma |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As reported |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
Pro-forma |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 123, the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the above assumptions for grants in the respective periods.
In accordance with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123), the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following assumptions for grants in the respective periods:
|
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
Grants |
|
Grants |
|
Grants |
|
|||||||||
Expected dividend rate |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
98.9 |
% |
|
|
97.8 |
% |
|
|
53.2 |
% |
|
|||
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
4.25 |
% |
|
|||
Expected lives (years) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
The weighted average fair value of options granted during fiscal years ended December 27, 2003, January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2005 were $12.44, $15.17 and $12.83, respectively.
F-12
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effect of potential common shares (dilutive stock options) outstanding during the period.
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards for reporting information about a companys operating segments. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers. We operate in a single operating segmentthe operation of mall-based specialty retail stores. Revenues from external customers are derived from merchandise sales and we do not rely on any major customers as a source of revenue.
Cache net sales mix by merchandise category at December 31, 2005 was as follows; Sportswear, 68.7 percent; Dresses, 21.7 percent and Accessories, 9.6 percent. Lillie Rubin net sales by merchandise category at December 31, 2005 were: Sportswear, 65.1 percent; Dresses, 29.6 percent and Accessories, 5.3 percent.
The Company has five major suppliers, who in total represented over 37% of purchases in fiscal 2005, of which the largest vendor accounted for 21% of the purchases during the year. The loss of any of these suppliers could adversely affect the Companys operations.
Recent Accounting Developments
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, which revises SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. This Statement requires an entity to recognize the cost of employee services received in share-based payment transactions and measure the cost on a grant-date fair value of the award. That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The provisions of SFAS No. 123R will be effective for the Companys financial statements issued for periods beginning after December 15, 2005. We estimate that the effect on fiscal 2006 earnings per share will be approximately $0.06 per share.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (SFAS No. 154), which replaces APB Opinion No. 120, Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for accounting and reporting a change in accounting principle, and applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principles, as well as changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance it does not include specific transition provisions. Specifically, SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. When it is impracticable to determine the effects of the change, the new accounting principle must be applied to the balances of assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the earliest period for which retrospective application is practicable and a corresponding adjustment must be made to the opening balance of retained earnings for that period rather than being reported in an income statement. When it is impracticable to determine the cumulative effect of the change, the new principle must be applied as if it were adopted prospectively from the earliest date practicable. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years
F-13
beginning after December 15, 2005. SFAS No. 154 does not change the transition provisions of any existing pronouncements. The Company has evaluated the impact of SFAS No. 154 and does not expect the adoption of this statement to have a significant impact on its consolidated statement of income or financial condition. The Company will apply SFAS No. 154 in future periods, when applicable.
In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143 (FIN 47). FIN 47 requires an entity to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value can be reasonably estimated. A conditional asset retirement obligation is a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing or method of settlement are conditional upon a future event that may or may not be within control of the entity. The Company adopted FIN 47 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and the adoption had an immaterial impact on the financial position or results of operations.
Supplemental Statements of Cash Flow Information
The Company paid no interest charges in fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005. During fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005 the Company paid $4,071,000, $4,143,000 and $8,248,000 in income taxes, respectively.
|
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
Construction allowances |
|
$ |
3,270,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,523,000 |
|
|
Third party credit card |
|
2,885,000 |
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
||
Other |
|
390,000 |
|
|
711,000 |
|
|
||
|
|
$ |
6,545,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,734,000 |
|
|
NOTE 3. EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS
|
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
||
Leasehold improvements |
|
$ |
45,349,000 |
|
$ |
51,827,000 |
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment |
|
45,049,000 |
|
51,715,000 |
|
||
|
|
90,398,000 |
|
103,542,000 |
|
||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
(43,280,000 |
) |
(50,782,000 |
) |
||
|
|
$ |
47,118,000 |
|
$ |
52,760,000 |
|
Store operating and general and administrative expenses include depreciation and amortization of $6,395,000, $8,232,000 and $9,779,000 in fiscal 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively.
F-14
|
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
||
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
3,315,000 |
|
$ |
2,894,000 |
|
Other taxes |
|
2,185,000 |
|
2,540,000 |
|
||
Group insurance |
|
509,000 |
|
598,000 |
|
||
Sales return reserve |
|
832,000 |
|
803,000 |
|
||
Leasehold additions |
|
928,000 |
|
859,000 |
|
||
Other customer deposits and credits |
|
3,858,000 |
|
4,752,000 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
11,627,000 |
|
$ |
12,446,000 |
|
Leasehold additions generally represent a liability to general contractors for a final 10% payable on construction contracts for store construction or renovations.
During November 2005, the Company reached an agreement with its bank to amend the amount available under the Amended Revolving Credit Facility. Pursuant to the newly Amended Revolving Credit Facility, $17,500,000 is available until expiration at November 30, 2008. The amounts outstanding under the credit facility bear interest at a maximum per annum rate equal to the banks prime rate, currently 7.50% at February 25, 2006, less 0.25%. The agreement contains selected financial and other covenants. Effective upon the occurrence of an Event of Default under the Revolving Credit Facility, the Company grants to the bank a security interest in the Companys inventory and certain receivables. The Company has at all times been in compliance with all loan covenants.
There have been no borrowings against the line of credit during fiscal 2004 and 2005. There were outstanding letters of credit of $3.1 million and $1.0 million pursuant to the Revolving Credit Facility at January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
Other liabilities primarily consist of accruals of future rent escalations and unamortized landlord construction allowances.
NOTE 8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
At December 31, 2005, the Company was obligated under operating leases for various store locations expiring at various times through 2019. The terms of the leases generally provide for the payment of minimum annual rentals, contingent rentals based on a percentage of sales in excess of a stipulated amount, and a portion of real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance. Most leases contain leasehold improvement reimbursements from landlords and/or rent holidays. In recognizing landlord incentives and minimum rent expenses, the Company amortizes the charges on a straight line basis over the lease term.
F-15
Store rental expense related to these leases, included in cost of sales, consisted of the following:
|
|
52 Weeks |
|
53 Weeks |
|
52 Weeks |
|
|||
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|||
|
|
December 27, |
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
|||
|
|
2003 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
Minimum rentals |
|
$ |
19,058,000 |
|
$ |
21,410,000 |
|
$ |
23,980,000 |
|
Contingent rentals |
|
8,258,000 |
|
9,176,000 |
|
10,625,000 |
|
|||
|
|
$ |
27,316,000 |
|
$ |
30,586,000 |
|
$ |
34,605,000 |
|
Future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consisted of the following at December 31, 2005:
Fiscal Year |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
25,859,000 |
|
2007 |
|
24,679,000 |
|
|
2008 |
|
23,868,000 |
|
|
2009 |
|
23,234,000 |
|
|
2010 |
|
21,388,000 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
69,597,000 |
|
|
Total future minimum lease payments |
|
$ |
188,625,000 |
|
The operating leases included in the above table do not include contingent rent based upon sales volume, which represented approximately 0.8% of minimum lease obligations in fiscal 2005, or variable costs such as maintenance, insurance and taxes, which represented approximately 43.5% of minimum lease obligations in fiscal 2005.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following tables summarize our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2005:
|
|
Payments Due in Period |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Within |
|
2-3 Years |
|
4-5 Years |
|
After |
|
|||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Employment contracts |
|
$ |
4,110 |
|
$ |
1,255 |
|
$ |
2,855 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Purchase Obligations |
|
38,222 |
|
38,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
42,332 |
|
$39,477 |
|
$2,855 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||
|
|
Payments Due in Period |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Within |
|
2-3 Years |
|
4-5 Years |
|
After |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Credit facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Standby Letters of credit |
|
969 |
|
|
969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
969 |
|
|
$ |
969 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
We issue standby letters of credit primarily for the importation of merchandise inventories. The Company does not have any off balance sheet financing arrangements.
F-16
The Company is exposed to a number of asserted and unasserted potential claims. Management does not believe it is probable that resolution of these matters will result in a material loss.
The Company has no guarantees, subleases or assigned lease obligations as of January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2005.
The provision for income taxes includes:
|
|
52 Weeks |
|
53 Weeks |
|
52 Weeks |
|
|||||
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|||||
|
|
December 27, |
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
|||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
|||||
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Federal |
|
|
$ |
5,105,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,328,000 |
|
$ |
7,792,000 |
|
State |
|
|
1,067,000 |
|
|
996,000 |
|
925,000 |
|
|||
|
|
|
6,172,000 |
|
|
5,324,000 |
|
8,717,000 |
|
|||
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Federal |
|
|
1,110,000 |
|
|
2,489,000 |
|
(959,000 |
) |
|||
State |
|
|
(193,000 |
) |
|
217,000 |
|
(83,000 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
917,000 |
|
|
2,706,000 |
|
(1,042,000 |
) |
|||
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
$ |
7,089,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,030,000 |
|
$ |
7,675,000 |
|
The Companys effective tax rate, as a percent of income before income taxes differs from the statutory federal tax rates as follows:
|
|
52 Weeks |
|
53 Weeks |
|
52 Weeks |
|
||||||
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
||||||
|
|
December 27, |
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||||
|
|
2003 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
Effective federal tax rate |
|
|
34.5 |
% |
|
|
34.5 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
Other net, primarily permanent items |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
37.7 |
% |
|
|
36.4 |
% |
|
The major components of the Companys net deferred tax assets (liabilities) at January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||||
Current |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
||||
Group insurance |
|
$ |
199,000 |
|
|
$ |
237,000 |
|
|
||
Sales return reserve |
|
325,000 |
|
|
319,000 |
|
|
||||
Inventory |
|
407,000 |
|
|
481,000 |
|
|
||||
Prepaid expenses |
|
(364,000 |
) |
|
(346,000 |
) |
|
||||
Total Current |
|
$ |
567,000 |
|
|
$ |
691,000 |
|
|
||
F-17
|
|
January 1, |
|
December 31, |
|
||||
Non-current |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
||
State tax net operating loss carryforwards |
|
$ |
76,000 |
|
$ |
76,000 |
|
||
Deferred rent |
|
590,000 |
|
875,000 |
|
||||
Deferred construction allowances |
|
|
|
(650,000 |
) |
||||
Other (principally depreciation expense) |
|
(3,689,000 |
) |
(2,406,000 |
) |
||||
Total Non-current |
|
$ |
(3,023,000 |
) |
$ |
(2,105,000 |
) |
||
The Companys income tax returns are periodically audited by various state and local jurisdictions. Additionally, the Internal Revenue Service audits the Companys federal income tax return. The Company reserves for tax contingencies, when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the contingent amount is reasonably estimable. These reserves are based upon the Companys best estimation of the potential exposures associated with the timing and amount of deductions as well as various tax filing positions. Due to the complexity of these examination issues, $325,000 has been accrued to date.
NOTE 10. INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN
On October 4, 2000, the Company adopted the 2000 Stock Option Plan. The plan is administered by the Compensation and Plan Administration Committee of the Companys Board of Directors. Under the option plan the Company reserved 550,000 shares of the Companys authorized common stock for issuance to officers and key employees of the Company.
On July 22, 2003, the Company adopted the 2003 Stock Option Plan. The plan is administered by the Compensation and Plan Administration Committee of the Companys Board of Directors. Under the option plan the Company reserved 900,000 shares of the Companys authorized common stock for issuance to officers and key employees of the Company.
On June 18, 2004, the Company paid a 3 for 2 stock dividend to holders of record.
Options granted under the plans have a ten-year term and may be either incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options. The options are granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant and generally vest over a four year period. The granted options generally become exercisable at the maximum rate of 25% per annum. The price is payable in cash at the time of the exercise or, at the discretion of the Administrators, through the delivery of shares of Common Stock or the Companys withholding of shares otherwise deliverable to the employee, or a combination thereof.
F-18
The following table summarizes all stock option transactions for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
Options |
|
Exercise |
|
|||||
Shares under option as of December 28, 2002 |
|
|
1,710,375 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
|
Options granted in 2003 |
|
|
1,222,500 |
|
|
|
12.44 |
|
|
|
Options exercised in 2003 |
|
|
(871,500 |
) |
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
Options canceled in 2003 |
|
|
(39,375 |
) |
|
|
3.30 |
|
|
|
Shares under option as of December 27, 2003 |
|
|
2,022,000 |
|
|
|
8.46 |
|
|
|
Options granted in 2004 |
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
15.17 |
|
|
|
Options exercised in 2004 |
|
|
(392,750 |
) |
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
Options canceled in 2004 |
|
|
(82,500 |
) |
|
|
9.67 |
|
|
|
Shares under option as of January 1, 2005 |
|
|
1,651,750 |
|
|
|
10.43 |
|
|
|
Options granted in 2005 |
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
12.83 |
|
|
|
Options exercised in 2005 |
|
|
(105,500 |
) |
|
|
5.63 |
|
|
|
Options canceled in 2005 |
|
|
(204,750 |
) |
|
|
11.48 |
|
|
|
Shares under options as of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,481,500 |
|
|
|
$ |
10.85 |
|
|
Options Exercisable at: |
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Weighted average |
|
|||||
December 27, 2003 |
|
|
531,750 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.71 |
|
|
||
January 1, 2005 |
|
|
712,375 |
|
|
|
$ |
7.47 |
|
|
||
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
742,250 |
|
|
|
$ |
8.80 |
|
|
Significant option groups outstanding at December 31, 2005 and related weighted average price and life information follows:
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Options |
|
Options |
|
Exercise |
|
Remaining |
|
|||||||||
8/30/05 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16.40 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
||
7/25/05 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.30 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|||
5/3/05 |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
11.53 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|||
5/2/05 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
11.61 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|||
4/25/05 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
11.00 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|||
1/22/04 |
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
47,250 |
|
|
|
15.17 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|||
7/22/03 |
|
|
932,250 |
|
|
|
369,750 |
|
|
|
12.65 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|||
4/16/02 |
|
|
114,500 |
|
|
|
114,500 |
|
|
|
4.69 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|||
10/2/01 |
|
|
77,250 |
|
|
|
77,250 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|||
10/4/00 |
|
|
112,500 |
|
|
|
112,500 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
F-19
NOTE 11. Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
53 weeks Ended |
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
|||||||||
Net income |
|
|
$ |
11,089,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
13,297,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
13,405,000 |
|
|
Net income per sharebasic |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
Net income per sharediluted |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
14,256,000 |
|
|
|
15,589,000 |
|
|
|
15,726,000 |
|
|
|||
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
465,000 |
|
|
|
415,000 |
|
|
|
424,000 |
|
|
|||
Weighted average common and potentially dilutive common shares |
|
|
14,721,000 |
|
|
|
16,004,000 |
|
|
|
16,150,000 |
|
|
Options to purchase common shares $16.40 and $18.30 per share during Fiscal 2005 were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the period presented.
|
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
53 Weeks Ended |
|
52 Weeks Ended |
|
|||||||||
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
as reported |
|
|
$ |
11,089,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
13,297,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
13,405,000 |
|
|
pro-forma |
|
|
$ |
10,377,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
12,211,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
12,475,000 |
|
|
Basic EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
as reported |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
pro-forma |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
Diluted EPS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
as reported |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
pro-forma |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
F-20
NOTE 12. QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
||||||
53 weeks ended January 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$57,194 |
|
$62,087 |
|
$49,430 |
|
$78,589 |
|
Gross profit |
|
25,688 |
|
29,149 |
|
19,596 |
|
37,122 |
|
Income (loss) before income tax provision |
|
5,246 |
|
7,229 |
|
(854 |
) |
9,706 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
1,997 |
|
2,868 |
|
(333 |
) |
3,498 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$3,249 |
|
$4,361 |
|
($521 |
) |
$6,208 |
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share: |
|
$0.21 |
|
$0.28 |
|
($0.03 |
) |
$0.40 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
|
$0.20 |
|
$0.27 |
|
($0.03 |
) |
$0.39 |
|
52 weeks ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$62,793 |
|
$66,970 |
|
$57,262 |
|
$79,320 |
|
Gross profit |
|
27,133 |
|
30,366 |
|
26,113 |
|
37,749 |
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
2,908 |
|
4,960 |
|
1,820 |
|
11,392 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
1,151 |
|
1,960 |
|
713 |
|
3,851 |
|
Net income |
|
$1,757 |
|
$3,000 |
|
$1,107 |
|
$7,541 |
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
$0.11 |
|
$0.19 |
|
$0.07 |
|
$0.48 |
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
$0.11 |
|
$0.19 |
|
$0.07 |
|
$0.47 |
|
Per share amounts are calculated independently for each quarter. The sum of the quarters may not equal the full year per share amounts.
F-21
Schedule II
Cache,
Inc and Subsidiaries
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Sales Return Reserve |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Charge to |
|
Other |
|
Deductions |
|
Balance at |
|
|||||||
52 Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
December 27, 2003 |
|
$ |
746,000 |
|
|
$ |
66,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
812,000 |
|
||
53 Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
January 1, 2005 |
|
$ |
812,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
832,000 |
|
||
52 Weeks Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
832,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($29,000) |
|
$ |
803,000 |
|
||
F-22