Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 000-30713

LOGO

Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

 

Delaware   77-0416458
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

1266 Kifer Road

Sunnyvale, California 94086

(Address of Principal Executive Offices including Zip Code)

(408) 523-2100

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES   x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer  x   Accelerated filer  ¨   Non-accelerated filer  ¨   Smaller Reporting company  ¨
      (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  ¨    NO  x

The Registrant had 37,934,659 shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding as of July 17, 2009.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

          Page No.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  
Item 1.    Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):    3
   Condensed consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008    3
   Condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008    4
   Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008    5
   Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements    6
Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    19
Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk    27
Item 4.    Controls and Procedures    27

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

   29
Item 1.    Legal Proceedings    29
Item 1A.    Risk Factors    29
Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds    30
Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities    30
Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders    31
Item 5.    Other Information    31
Item 6.    Exhibits    32
   Signature    33

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PAR VALUE)

(UNAUDITED)

 

     June 30,
2009
   December 31,
2008
 

ASSETS

     

Current assets:

     

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 173,421    $ 194,623   

Short-term investments

     207,241      256,746   

Accounts receivable, net

     175,216      170,107   

Inventory

     59,247      63,460   

Prepaids and other assets

     13,634      9,496   

Deferred tax assets

     9,299      9,458   
               

Total current assets

     638,058      703,890   

Property, plant and equipment, net

     122,584      117,021   

Long-term investments

     521,399      450,504   

Long-term deferred tax assets

     44,124      35,899   

Intangible assets, net

     63,992      56,224   

Goodwill

     110,740      110,740   

Other assets

     385      346   
               

Total assets

   $ 1,501,282    $ 1,474,624   
               

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

     

Current liabilities:

     

Accounts payable

   $ 26,555    $ 20,501   

Accrued compensation and employee benefits

     29,315      36,930   

Deferred revenue

     88,215      77,981   

Other accrued liabilities

     34,915      29,104   
               

Total current liabilities

     179,000      164,516   

Long-term liabilities

     51,098      43,342   
               

Total liabilities

     230,098      207,858   
               

Commitments and contingencies

     —        —     

Stockholders’ equity:

     

Preferred stock, 2,500 shares authorized, $0.001 par value, issuable in series; no shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008

     —        —     

Common stock, 100,000 shares authorized, $0.001 par value, 37,931 and 39,183 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively

     38      39   

Additional paid-in capital

     900,712      871,846   

Retained earnings

     369,640      397,824   

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

     794      (2,943
               

Total stockholders’ equity

     1,271,184      1,266,766   
               

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 1,501,282    $ 1,474,624   
               

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

(UNAUDITED)

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   Six Months Ended
June 30,
     2009    2008    2009    2008

Revenue:

           

Products

   $ 219,346    $ 189,780    $ 368,396    $ 350,731

Services

     41,278      29,409      80,600      56,652
                           

Total revenue

     260,624      219,189      448,996      407,383

Cost of revenue:

           

Products

     55,542      50,036      100,808      94,888

Services

     14,897      13,097      29,299      26,632
                           

Total cost of revenue

     70,439      63,133      130,107      121,520
                           

Gross profit

     190,185      156,056      318,889      285,863
                           

Operating expenses:

           

Selling, general, and administrative

     67,276      57,504      129,642      106,138

Research and development

     23,369      20,357      44,681      36,658
                           

Total operating expenses

     90,645      77,861      174,323      142,796
                           

Income from operations

     99,540      78,195      144,566      143,067

Interest and other income, net

     5,171      5,707      10,187      14,248
                           

Income before taxes

     104,711      83,902      154,753      157,315

Income tax expense

     42,323      32,720      64,223      61,352
                           

Net income

   $ 62,388    $ 51,182    $ 90,530    $ 95,963
                           

Earnings per share:

           

Basic

   $ 1.65    $ 1.32    $ 2.36    $ 2.48
                           

Diluted

   $ 1.62    $ 1.28    $ 2.32    $ 2.40
                           

Shares used in computing earnings per share:

           

Basic

     37,897      38,773      38,390      38,677
                           

Diluted

     38,557      39,980      38,946      39,914
                           

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(IN THOUSANDS)

(UNAUDITED)

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2009     2008  

Operating Activities:

    

Net income

   $ 90,530      $ 95,963   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Depreciation

     9,089        6,719   

Amortization of intangible assets

     7,857        4,075   

Deferred income taxes

     (8,417     (7,600

Income tax benefits from employee stock option plans and acquisition

     715        38,018   

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

     (970     (35,580

Share-based compensation expense

     47,382        34,282   

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

    

Accounts receivable

     (5,108     (31,713

Inventory

     4,212        (10,198

Prepaids and other assets

     (3,956     4,416   

Accounts payable

     6,026        (9,828

Accrued compensation and employee benefits

     (7,622     (3,301

Deferred revenue

     10,290        11,361   

Accrued liabilities

     23,085        7,571   
                

Net cash provided by operating activities

     173,113        104,185   
                

Investing Activities:

    

Purchase of investments

     (303,224     (417,496

Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments

     286,124        405,931   

Purchase of property and equipment and acquisition of intellectual property

     (40,334     (52,035
                

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

     (57,434     (63,600
                

Financing Activities:

    

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net

     12,054        23,318   

Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation

     970        35,580   

Repurchase and retirement of common stock

     (150,000     —     
                

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     (136,976     58,898   
                

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     95        715   
                

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (21,202     100,198   

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

     194,623        122,825   
                

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

   $ 173,421      $ 223,023   
                

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

In this report, “Intuitive Surgical”, “Intuitive”, and the “Company” refer to Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Intuitive Surgical, Inc. designs, manufactures, and markets the da Vinci Surgical System, which is an advanced surgical system that the Company believes represents a new generation of surgery. The da Vinci Surgical System consists of a surgeon’s console, a patient-side cart, a high performance vision system and proprietary “wristed” instruments. The da Vinci Surgical System seamlessly translates the surgeon’s natural hand movements on instrument controls at the console into corresponding micro-movements of instruments positioned inside the patient through small puncture incisions, or ports. The Company markets its products through sales representatives in the United States, and through a combination of sales representatives and distributors in its international markets.

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (“financial statements”) of Intuitive Surgical, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) have been prepared on a consistent basis with the December 31, 2008 audited consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly state the information set forth herein. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and, therefore, omit certain information and footnote disclosure necessary to present the statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, which was filed on February 6, 2009. The results of operations for the first six months of fiscal 2009 are not indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or any future periods.

Subsequent Events Evaluation

Management has reviewed and evaluated material subsequent events from the balance sheet date of June 30, 2009 through the financial statements issue date of July 23, 2009. All appropriate subsequent event disclosures, if any, have been made in notes to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Foreign Currency and Other Hedging Instruments

The accounts of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated in accordance with SFAS No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation” (SFAS 52). The Company has determined that the functional currency of its subsidiaries should be their local currency, with the exception of its subsidiaries in the Cayman Islands and Switzerland, whose functional currency is the U.S. dollar. For subsidiaries whose local currency is their functional currency, their assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates at the balance sheet date and revenues and expenses are translated using average exchange rates in effect during the quarter. Gains and losses from foreign currency translation are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within stockholders’ equity in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.

For all non functional currency account balances, the re-measurement of such balances to the functional currency will result in either a foreign exchange gain or loss which is recorded to interest and other income, net in the same accounting period that the re-measurement occurred.

In January 2009, the Company began a hedging program to address the risk associated with non-functional currency (primarily Euro) financial statement exposures. The Company accounts for these instruments in accordance with FASB Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended,” (SFAS 133) which requires that every derivative instrument be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or a liability measured at its fair value as of the reporting date. Derivative valuations are determined using SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157) Level 2 inputs (as defined on Note 3), including closing currency prices and observable inputs other than quoted prices, including interest rates, forward points and credit risk.

 

6


Table of Contents

The Company sells products to certain European customers in foreign currencies. Fluctuations in exchange rates can change the Company’s U.S. dollar equivalent revenue and hence the Company’s U.S. dollar earnings. The Company hedges a portion of forecasted foreign currency denominated sales (primarily Euro-denominated) utilizing foreign exchange forward contracts. These transactions are designated as cash flow hedges and are accounted for under the hedge accounting provisions of SFAS No. 133. The effective portion of the hedge gain or loss is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and subsequently reclassified into net revenues when the hedged exposure affects earnings. Any ineffective portions of related gains or losses are recorded in the statements of income immediately. In the event the underlying forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, the Company will reclassify the gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to net revenues on its consolidated statement of income.

The Company also hedges the net recognized non-functional currency balance sheet exposures with foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that its earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in exchange rates. These derivative instruments are carried at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded to interest and other income, net on the Company’s consolidated statement of income and are intended to offset gains and losses on the assets and liabilities being hedged.

The bank counterparties to the foreign exchange forward contracts expose the Company to credit-related losses in the event of their nonperformance. However, to mitigate that risk, the Company only contracts with counterparties that meet certain minimum requirements under its counterparty risk assessment process. The Company monitors ratings, and potential downgrades on at least a quarterly basis. Based on its on-going assessment of counterparty risk, the Company will adjust its exposure to various counterparties.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

With the exception of those discussed below, there have been no recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements during the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the recent accounting pronouncements described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, that are of significance, or potential significance to the Company.

Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted three Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) Staff Positions (“FSP”) that were intended to provide additional application guidance and enhanced disclosures regarding fair value measurements and impairments of securities. FSP No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, provides additional guidelines for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. FSP No. 115-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, changes existing accounting requirements for other-than-temporary-impairment (OTTI) for debt securities by replacing the current requirement that a holder have the positive intent and ability to hold an impaired security to recovery in order to conclude an impairment was temporary with a requirement that an entity conclude it does not intend to sell an impaired security and it will not be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost basis. FSP No. 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, increases the frequency of fair value disclosures. These FSPs are effective for fiscal years and interim periods ended after June 15, 2009. The adoption of these FSPs did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (SFAS 165). The standard modifies the names of the two types of subsequent events either as recognized subsequent events (previously referred to in practice as Type I subsequent events) or non-recognized subsequent events (previously referred to in practice as Type II subsequent events). In addition, the standard modifies the definition of subsequent events to refer to events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date, but before the financial statements are issued (for public entities) or available to be issued (for nonpublic entities). It also requires the disclosure of the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The standard did not result in significant changes in the practice of subsequent event disclosures or the related accounting thereof, and therefore the adoption did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF No. 08-7, “Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets” (EITF 08-7) that clarifies accounting for defensive intangible assets subsequent to initial measurement. EITF 08-7 applies to acquired intangible assets which an entity has no intention of actively using, or intends to discontinue use of, the intangible asset but holds it to prevent others from obtaining access to it (i.e., a defensive intangible asset). Under EITF 08-7, the Task Force reached a consensus that an acquired defensive asset should be accounted for as a separate unit of accounting (i.e., an asset separate from other assets of the acquirer); and the useful life assigned to an acquired defensive asset should be based on the period during which the asset would diminish in value. The adoption did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

7


Table of Contents

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (FSP No. 142-3) that amends the factors considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142. FSP No. 142-3 requires a consistent approach between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of an asset under SFAS No. 141(R). The FSP also requires enhanced disclosures when an intangible asset’s expected future cash flows are affected by an entity’s intent and/or ability to renew or extend the arrangement. The adoption did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS 161). The standard requires additional quantitative disclosures (provided in tabular form) and qualitative disclosures for derivative instruments. The required disclosures include how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; the relative volume of derivative activity; the objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments; the accounting treatment for those derivative instruments formally designated as the hedging instrument in a hedge relationship; and the existence and nature of credit-risk-related contingent features for derivatives. SFAS 161 does not change the accounting treatment for derivative instruments. The Company adopted the disclosures required by SFAS 161 in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Since SFAS 161 only required additional disclosure, the adoption did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (FSP 157-2). FSP 157-2 delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), until the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2009. These include goodwill and other non-amortizable intangible assets. The adoption of SFAS 157 to non-financial assets and liabilities did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (SFAS 141(R)). Under SFAS 141(R), an entity is required to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, contractual contingencies, and contingent consideration at their fair value on the acquisition date. It further requires that acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the acquisition and expensed as incurred; that restructuring costs generally be expensed in periods subsequent to the acquisition date; and that changes in accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties after the measurement period be recognized as a component of provision for taxes. In addition, acquired in-process research and development is capitalized as an intangible asset and amortized over its estimated useful life. For Intuitive, SFAS 141(R) is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of January 1, 2009, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired contingencies under SFAS 109. With the adoption of SFAS 141(R), any tax related adjustments associated with acquisitions that closed prior to January 1, 2009 will be recorded through income tax expense, whereas the previous accounting treatment would require any adjustment to be recognized through the purchase price. The adoption of SFAS 141(R) did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached on EITF Issue No. 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (EITF 07-5). This EITF provides guidance for determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The EITF applies to any freestanding financial instrument or embedded feature that has all the characteristics of a derivative under paragraphs 6–9 of SFAS No. 133, for purposes of determining whether that instrument or embedded feature qualifies for the first part of the scope exception under paragraph 11(a) of SFAS No. 133. The EITF also applies to any freestanding financial instrument that is potentially settled in an entity’s own stock, regardless of whether the instrument has all the characteristics of a derivative under paragraphs 6–9 of SFAS No. 133, for purposes of determining whether the instrument is within the scope of EITF No. 00-19 “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock” (EITF 00-19), which provides accounting guidance for instruments that are indexed to, and potentially settled in, the issuer’s own stock. EITF No. 07-5 was effective beginning first quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company applied EITF 07-5 in its accounting for the share repurchase program. See Note 6 for further discussion.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This standard replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and establishes only two levels of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), authoritative and nonauthoritative. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) will become the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC

 

8


Table of Contents

accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. This standard is effective for financial statements for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company will begin to use the new guidelines and numbering system prescribed by the Codification when referring to GAAP in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. As the Codification was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it should not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3. INVESTMENTS

The following table summarizes the Company’s investments (in thousands):

 

     Amortized
Cost
   Gross
Unrealized
Gains
   Gross
Unrealized
Losses
    Fair
Value

June 30, 2009

          

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 173,421    $ —      $ —        $ 173,421

Short-term investments:

          

Commercial paper

     13,042      —        —          13,042

Municipal notes

     13,605      102      —          13,707

U.S. corporate debt

     115,615      838      (156     116,297

U.S. treasuries

     20,723      257      —          20,980

U.S government agencies

     42,911      304      —          43,215
                            

Total short-term investments

   $ 205,896    $ 1,501    $ (156   $ 207,241
                            

Long-term investments:

          

Municipal notes

   $ 194,390    $ 954    $ (11,500   $ 183,844

U.S. corporate debt

     169,289      2,114      (694     170,709

U.S. Treasuries

     32,075      194      (60     32,209

U.S government agencies

     125,869      1,147      (70     126,946

Put option

     —        7,691      —          7,691
                            

Total long-term investments

   $ 521,623    $ 12,100    $ (12,324   $ 521,399
                            

Total cash, cash equivalents and investments

   $ 900,940    $ 13,601    $ (12,480   $ 902,061
                            

December 31, 2008

          

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 194,621      2      —        $ 194,623

Short-term investments:

          

Commercial paper

   $ 34,186    $ 81    $ —        $ 34,267

U.S. corporate debt

     109,048      590      (582     109,056

U.S. treasuries

     12,408      145      -        12,553

U.S. government agencies

     100,032      858      (20     100,870
                            

Total short-term investments

   $ 255,674    $ 1,674    $ (602   $ 256,746
                            

Long-term investments:

          

Municipal notes

   $ 143,088    $ 170    $ (15,597   $ 127,661

U.S. corporate debt

     166,215      1,152      (3,970     163,397

U.S. treasuries

     21,987      648      —          22,635

U.S. government agencies

     123,458      1,748      —          125,206

Put option

     —        11,605      —          11,605
                            

Total long-term investments

   $ 454,748    $ 15,323    $ (19,567   $ 450,504
                            

Total cash, cash equivalents and investments

   $ 905,043    $ 16,999    $ (20,169   $ 901,873
                            

 

9


Table of Contents

The following is a summary of the amortized cost and estimated fair value of the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and investments at June 30, 2009 by maturity date (in thousands):

 

     Amortized
Cost
   Fair Value

Mature in less than one year

   $ 379,317    $ 380,662

Mature in one to five years

     434,863      438,396

Mature in more than five years

     86,760      83,003
             

Total

   $ 900,940    $ 902,061
             

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, realized gains or losses recognized on the sale of investments were not material. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax, of $0.8 million and ($3.2) million, respectively, were included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. At June 30, 2009, the Company evaluated its net unrealized losses, the majority of which are from auction-rate securities, and determined them to be temporary. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary included the length of time and extent to which the investments fair value has been less than the cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, extent of the loss related to credit of the issuer, the expected cash flows from the security, the Company’s intent to sell the security and whether or not the Company will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost.

NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis, including cash equivalents, available-for-sale securities, trading securities and foreign currency derivatives. The fair value of these financial assets and liabilities was determined based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

 

10


Table of Contents

The following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009 (in thousands):

 

     Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2009 Using

Assets

   Level 1    Level 2    Level 3    Total

Money Market funds

   $ 141,411    $ —      $ —      $ 141,411

U.S. Treasuries

     53,189      —        —        53,189

Commercial paper

     —        21,542      —        21,542

Corporate debt

     —        287,006      —        287,006

U.S. government agencies

     —        170,161      —        170,161

Municipal notes

     —        114,548      83,003      197,551

Put option

     —        —        7,691      7,691
                           

Total assets measured at fair value

   $ 194,600    $ 593,257    $ 90,694    $ 878,551
                           

Liabilities

                   

Foreign Currency Derivatives

   $ —      $ 914    $ —      $ 914
                           

Total liabilities measured at fair value

   $ —      $ 914    $ —      $ 914
                           

Amounts included in:

           

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 141,411    $ 8,500    $ —      $ 149,911

Short-term investments

     20,980      186,261      —        207,241

Long-term investments

     32,209      398,496      90,694      521,399
                           

Total assets measured at fair value

   $ 194,600    $ 593,257    $ 90,694    $ 878,551
                           

Other accrued liabilities

   $ —      $ 914    $ —      $ 914
                           

Total liabilities measured at fair value

   $ —      $ 914    $ —      $ 914
                           

 

11


Table of Contents

The fair value of these financial assets was determined using the following level of inputs as of December 31, 2008 and are presented on the Company’s unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows (in thousands):

 

     Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using

Assets

   Level 1    Level 2    Level 3    Total

Money Market funds

   $ 156,729    $ —      $ —      $ 156,729

U.S. Treasuries

     45,188      —        —        45,188

Commercial paper

     —        37,465      —        37,465

Corporate debt

     —        272,453      —        272,453

U.S. government agencies

     —        226,077      —        226,077

Municipal notes

     —        48,590      79,070      127,660

Put option

     —        —        11,605      11,605
                           

Total assets measured at fair value

   $ 201,917    $ 584,585    $ 90,675    $ 877,177
                           

Amounts included in:

           

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 166,729    $ 3,198    $ —      $ 169,927

Short-term investments

   $ 12,553    $ 244,193      —      $ 256,746

Long-term investments

   $ 22,635    $ 337,194    $ 90,675    $ 450,504
                           

Total assets measured at fair value

   $ 201,917    $ 584,585    $ 90,675    $ 877,177
                           

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the assets measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in thousands):

 

     Fair Value Measurements at
Reporting Date Using

significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 
         Put Option             ARS      

Balance at January 1, 2009

   $ 11,605      $ 79,070   

Purchases

     —          —     

Sales/Maturities

     —          —     

Total gains or (losses):

     —          —     

Included in other comprehensive income (loss)

     —          (454

Included in earnings

     (3,675     3,675   
                

Balance at March 31, 2009

     7,930        82,291   

Purchases

     —          —     

Sales/Maturities

     —          (200

Total gains or (losses):

     —          —     

Included in other comprehensive income (loss)

     —          673   

Included in earnings

     (239     239   
                

Balance at June 30, 2009

   $ 7,691      $ 83,003   
                

 

12


Table of Contents

Level 3 assets consist of municipal bonds with an auction reset feature (ARS) whose underlying assets are student loans which are substantially backed by the federal government. Since the auctions for these securities have continued to fail since February 2008, these investments are not currently trading and therefore do not have a readily determinable market value. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of the ARS no longer approximates par value. A large portion of these ARS are held by UBS AG (UBS), one of the Company’s investment providers. In November 2008, the Company accepted an offer (the “Right”) from UBS entitling the Company to sell at par value auction-rate securities originally purchased from UBS (approximately $71.2 million, par value) at anytime during a two-year period from June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012. Although the Company expects to sell its ARS under the Right, if the Right is not exercised before July 2, 2012, it will expire and UBS will have no further rights or obligation to buy the Company’s ARS. The Company has valued the ARS and put option using a discounted cash flow model based on Level 3 assumptions. The assumptions used in valuing the ARS and the put option include estimates of, based on data available as of June 30, 2009, interest rates, timing and amount of cash flows, credit and liquidity premiums, expected holding periods of the ARS, loan rates per the UBS Rights offering and bearer risk associated with UBS’s financial ability to repurchase the ARS beginning June 30, 2010.

Foreign currency derivative

On a monthly basis, the Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts with one to seven month terms. It does not purchase derivatives for trading purposes. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had the notional amount of €18.0 million and £6.5 million outstanding currency forward contracts that were entered into to hedge non-functional currency denominated net monetary assets and €6.0 million to hedge Euro denominated sales.

The fair value of derivative instruments in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 was approximately $0.9 million in liabilities. The effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was not significant. The Company recognized loss of approximately $1.4 million for derivative instruments not designated as hedges during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and the recognized loss was not significant during the six months ended June 30, 2009.

NOTE 5. INVENTORY

The following table provides details of selected balance sheet items (in thousands):

 

     June 30,
2009
   December 31,
2008

Inventory

     

Raw materials

   $ 16,285    $ 19,901

Work-in-process

     2,956      4,097

Finished goods

     40,006      39,462
             

Total

   $ 59,247    $ 63,460
             

 

13


Table of Contents

NOTE 6. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2009     2008     2009     2008  

Net income, as reported

   $ 62,388      $ 51,182      $ 90,530      $ 95,963   

Foreign currency translation adjustments

     251        132        66        511   

Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments, net of tax:

        

Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative

     (1,049     —          (696     —     

Reclassification adjustment for (gain) loss on derivative instruments recognized during the period

     606        —          436        —     

Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax:

        

Unrealized gains (losses) arising during period

     1,963        (5,117     3,931        (6,780
                                

Total other comprehensive income

   $ 64,159      $ 46,197      $ 94,267      $ 89,694   
                                

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (in thousands):

 

     June 30,
2009
    December 31,
2008
 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

   $ 293      $ 227   

Accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives, net of tax

     (260     —     

Accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax

     761        (3,170
                

Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   $ 794      $ (2,943
                

 

14


Table of Contents

Stock Option Plans

A summary of stock option activity under the Plans for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is presented as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

           Stock Options Outstanding
     Shares
Available
for Grant
    Number
Outstanding
    Weighted Average
Exercise Price

Per Share

Balance at December 31, 2008 (with 1,791 options exerciseable at a weighted-average exercise price of $100.71 per share and with 3,551 options vested and expected to vest at a weighted-average exercise price of $160.68 per share)

   8,449      3,749      $ 163.25

Options authorized

   2,046       

Options granted

   (1,481   1,481        108.76

Options exercised

   —        (99     74.15

Options forfeited/expired

   93      (93     194.49
              

Balance at June 30, 2009 (with 2,148 options exerciseable at a weighted-average exercise price of $121.43 per share and with 4,764 options vested and expected to vest at a weighted-average exercise price of $146.96 per share)

   9,107      5,038      $ 148.40
              

Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)

Under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, employees purchased approximately 55,185 shares for $4.7 million and 46,700 shares for $4.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

15


Table of Contents

Stock-based Compensation

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation charges (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   Six Months Ended
June 30,
     2009    2008    2009    2008

Cost of sales - products

   $ 1,941    $ 1,639    $ 3,740    $ 2,905

Cost of sales - services

     1,690      1,288      3,230      2,269
                           

Total cost of sales

     3,631      2,927      6,970      5,174

Selling, general and administrative

     15,494      12,353      29,866      21,370

Research and development

     5,524      4,439      10,546      7,738
                           

Stock-based compensation expense before income taxes

     24,649      19,719      47,382      34,282

Income taxes

     6,878      7,170      14,142      12,347
                           

Stock-based compensation expense after income taxes

   $ 17,771    $ 12,549    $ 33,240    $ 21,935
                           

The fair value of each option grant and the fair value of the option component of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan shares were estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions, assuming no expected dividends:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2009     2008     2009     2008  

Stock Options

        

Average risk free interest rate

     2.10     2.88     1.68     2.79

Average expected term (years)

     5.1        5.0        5.3        5.0   

Average expected volatility

     51     51     56     52

Weighted average fair value at grant date

   $ 62.26      $ 142.66      $ 55.18      $ 143.03   

Total stock-based compensation expense (000’s)

   $ 22,999      $ 18,803      $ 44,260      $ 32,336   

ESPP

        

Average risk free interest rate

         0.58     2.19

Average expected term (years)

         1.3        1.3   

Average expected volatility

         65     57

Weighted average fair value at grant date

       $ 43.94      $ 101.03   

Total stock-based compensation expense (000’s)

   $ 1,650      $ 916      $ 3,122      $ 1,946   

There were no new ESPP offerings during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

 

16


Table of Contents

NOTE 7. SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM

In March 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $300 million of the Company’s common stock through open market and private block transactions pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 plans or privately negotiated purchases or other means, including accelerated stock repurchase transactions or similar arrangements. In connection with this stock repurchase authorization, the Company entered into a collared accelerated share repurchase program (the “ASR Program”) with Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“Goldman”) to repurchase $150 million of the Company’s common stock. The number of shares repurchased by Intuitive under the ASR Program was based generally on the average daily volume-weighted average price of Intuitive’s common stock during a specific period less a predetermined discount per share. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has received and retired 1,406,049 shares of the Company’s common stock. All ASR Program purchases were completed on June 5, 2009 and during the three months ended June 30, 2009 the Company did not receive any additional shares. As of June 30, 2009, the Company had $150 million remaining under the board authorized amount of stock repurchases.

In accordance with EITF Issue No. 99-7, “Accounting for an Accelerated Share Repurchase Program,” the Company accounted for the accelerated share repurchase as two separate transactions: (a) as shares of common stock acquired in a treasury stock transaction recorded on the transaction date and (b) as a forward contract indexed to the Company’s common stock. As such, the Company accounted for the 1,406,049 shares that it received as a repurchase of its common stock and retired those shares immediately for net income per share purposes. The Company has determined that the forward contract indexed to the Company’s common stock met all of the applicable criteria for equity classification in accordance with EITF 00-19, and therefore, the contract was not accounted for as a derivative under SFAS 133.

The Company uses the par value method of accounting for its stock repurchases. Under the par value method, common stock is first charged with the par value of the shares involved. The excess of the cost of shares acquired over the par value is allocated to additional-paid-in capital (APIC) based on an estimated average amount per issued share with the excess amounts charged to retained earnings. As a result of the stock repurchases during March 2009, the Company reduced common stock and APIC by an aggregate of $31.3 million and charged $118.7 million to retained earnings.

NOTE 8. INCOME TAXES

As part of the process of preparing the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company is required to estimate its income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. This process involves estimating the current tax liability under the most recent tax laws and assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $42.3 million, or 40.4% of pre-tax income, compared with $32.7 million, or 39.0% of pre-tax income for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $64.2 million, or 41.5% of pre-tax income, compared with $61.3 million, or 39.0% of pre-tax income for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to state income taxes and non-deductible stock option expenses, partially offset by 2009 research and development (“R&D”) credits and domestic production deductions. The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 differs from the federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes and non-deductible stock option expenses, partially offset by domestic production deductions.

A California tax law change enacted in February 2009 allows an elective single sales factor for state apportionment for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The Company expects to benefit from the California single sale factor election for apportioning income for years 2011 and beyond. As a result of its anticipated election of the single sales factor, in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (SFAS 109), the Company has re-measured its deferred tax assets taking into account the reversal pattern and the expected California tax rate under the elective single sales factor. The impact of this change resulted in a decrease to California beginning deferred tax assets of $1.6 million and this charge was recorded in the Company’s income tax provision during the three months ended March 31, 2009.

As of June 30, 2009, the Company has total gross unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $51.0 million compared with approximately $42.0 million as of December 31, 2008, representing an increase of approximately $9.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Of the total gross unrecognized tax benefits, $49.9 million, if recognized, would reduce the Company’s effective tax rate in the period of recognition.

The Company files federal, state and foreign income tax returns in many jurisdictions in the United States and abroad. For U.S. federal and California income tax purposes, the statute of limitations currently remain open for all years since inception due to utilization of net operating losses and R&D credits generated in prior years.

 

17


Table of Contents

NOTE 9. NET INCOME PER SHARE

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
   Six Months Ended
June 30,
     2009    2008    2009    2008

Net income

   $ 62,388    $ 51,182    $ 90,530    $ 95,963

Basic:

           

Weighted-average shares outstanding

     37,897      38,773      38,390      38,677
                           

Basic net income per share

   $ 1.65    $ 1.32    $ 2.36    $ 2.48
                           

Diluted:

           

Weighted-average shares outstanding used in basic calculation

     37,897      38,773      38,390      38,677

Add common stock equivalents

     660      1,207      556      1,237
                           

Weighted-average shares used in computing diluted net income per shares

     38,557      39,980      38,946      39,914
                           

Diluted earnings per share

   $ 1.62    $ 1.28    $ 2.32    $ 2.40
                           

Employee stock options to purchase approximately 2,914,505 and 1,251,460 weighted shares for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 2,957,813 and 962,294 weighted shares for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been antidilutive.

 

18


Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

In this report, “Intuitive Surgical”, “Intuitive”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our” refer to Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition as of June 30, 2009 and results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 should be read in conjunction with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations concerning matters that are not historical facts. Words such as “projects”, “believes”, “anticipates”, “plans”, “expects”, “intends” and similar words and expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements related to our expected business, new product introductions, results of operations, future financial position, our ability to increase our revenues, the mix of our revenues between product and service revenues, our financing plans and capital requirements, our costs of revenue, our expenses, our potential tax assets or liabilities, the effect of recent accounting pronouncements, our investments, cash flows and our ability to finance operations from cash flows and similar matters and include statements based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the economies and markets in which we operate and our beliefs and assumptions regarding these economies and markets. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are based on current expectation and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict, including those risk factors described throughout this filing and detailed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and other periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, particularly in Part I, “Item 1A: Risk Factors”. Our actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.

Intuitive®, Intuitive Surgical®, da Vinci®, da Vinci S®, da Vinci® S HD Surgical System™, da Vinci® Si™, EndoWrist®, and InSite® are trademarks of Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

Overview

Products. We design, manufacture and market da Vinci Surgical Systems, which are advanced surgical systems that we believe represent a new generation of surgery. The da Vinci Surgical System consists of a surgeon’s console, a patient-side cart and a high performance vision system. The product line also includes proprietary “wristed” instruments and surgical accessories. The da Vinci Surgical System seamlessly translates the surgeon’s natural hand movements on instrument controls at a console into corresponding micro-movements of instruments positioned inside the patient through small puncture incisions, or ports. We believe that the da Vinci Surgical System is the only commercially available technology that can provide the surgeon with intuitive control, range of motion, fine tissue manipulation capability and 3-D High Definition (HD) visualization, while simultaneously allowing the surgeons to work through the small ports of minimally invasive surgery, or MIS. By placing computer-enhanced technology between the surgeon and the patient, we believe that the da Vinci Surgical System enables surgeons to improve clinical outcomes while reducing the invasiveness of complex surgical procedures. The da Vinci Surgical System is sold into multiple surgical specialties, principally urology, gynecology, cardiothoracic, and general surgery.

Business Model. In our business model, we generate revenue from both the initial capital sales of da Vinci Surgical Systems as well as recurring revenue, comprised of instruments, accessories, and service revenue. The da Vinci Surgical System generally sells for $0.7 million to $2.3 million, depending on configuration, and represents a significant capital equipment investment for our customers. We then generate recurring revenue as our customers purchase our EndoWrist instruments and accessory products for use in performing procedures with the da Vinci Surgical System. EndoWrist instruments and accessories will either expire or wear out as they are used in surgery and will need to be replaced as they are consumed. We generate additional recurring revenue from ongoing system service. We typically enter into service contracts at the time the system is sold. These service contracts have been generally renewable at the end of the service period, typically at an annual rate of approximately $100,000 to $180,000 per year, depending on the configuration of the underlying system.

Since the introduction of the da Vinci Surgical System in 1999, our established base of da Vinci Surgical Systems has grown and robotic surgery volume has increased. Recurring revenue has grown at an equal or faster rate than system revenue. Revenue generated from the sale of instruments and accessories, and service increased from 45% of total revenue in 2006 to 48% of total revenue in 2008. Recurring revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $137.1 million or 53% of total revenue and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $256.0 million, or 57% of total revenue. The increase in recurring revenue relative to system revenue reflects continuing adoption of procedures on a growing base of installed da Vinci Surgical Systems. The installed base of da Vinci Surgical Systems has grown from 559 at December 31, 2006 to 1,111 at December 31, 2008 to 1,242 at June 30, 2009.

 

19


Table of Contents

Regulatory Clearances

We believe that we have obtained the necessary clearances to market our products to our targeted surgical specialties within the United States. As we make additions to the target procedures, we will continue to obtain the necessary clearances. The following table lists chronologically our FDA clearances to date:

 

   

July 2000 – General laparoscopic procedures

 

   

March 2001 – Non-cardiac thoracoscopic procedures

 

   

May 2001 – Prostatectomy procedures

 

   

November 2002 – Cardiotomy procedures

 

   

July 2004 – Cardiac revascularization procedures

 

   

March 2005 – Urologic surgical procedures

 

   

April 2005 – Gynecologic surgical procedures

 

   

June 2005 – Pediatric surgical procedures

During the first quarter of 2009, we received clearance to market our da Vinci Si Surgical System.

2009 Business Events and Trends

Introduction. We have experienced rapid procedure growth since introducing our products in 1999 through the second quarter of 2009. This has been driven by the continued adoption of the da Vinci Surgical System for use in urologic, gynecologic, cardiothoracic, and general surgeries. While procedure growth has continued to be strong, system sales during late 2008 and first half of 2009 have been impacted by reduced hospital demand for capital equipment in connection with the current economic recession.

da Vinci Si Surgical System Product Launch. We recently launched our newest da Vinci model, the da Vinci Si. The da Vinci Si brings to market three significant innovations. First, our InSite™ imaging system has been substantially redesigned for increased visual acuity and improved ease-of-use. The HD imaging system’s increased performance is equivalent to the move from 720p to 1080i in commercial television. We believe that the increased visual performance will continue to increase surgeon precision and confidence and will contribute to improved patient outcomes and shorter procedure times. Secondly, the da Vinci Si surgeon’s user interface has been redesigned to allow simplified and integrated control of da Vinci products and other operating room devices, such as electro-surgical units. The new user interface also includes a set of ergonomic controls for surgeon comfort. We believe the simplified interface will allow for easier surgeon training and decreased surgeon workload during surgery. The third significant improvement is the introduction of a dual surgeon’s console for use during surgery, which will allow new methods of training da Vinci surgeons and enable collaborative da Vinci surgery. With the da Vinci Si, a surgeon sitting at a second console can view the same surgery as the primary surgeon and can be passed control of some or all of the da Vinci arms during a case. We believe this will both shorten the learning curve for new surgeons and will allow collaborative surgery in complex cases.

The da Vinci Si Surgical System is FDA approved and CE marked. It is currently available in the United States and most of Europe. da Vinci Si Systems are available with an option to purchase a second console. Existing da Vinci S instruments and most da Vinci S accessories are compatible with the da Vinci Si system. An upgrade from a da Vinci S System to the da Vinci Si System is available for our current customers. We will continue to sell, service and support the previous da Vinci models - the standard da Vinci and the da Vinci S Surgical Systems.

We offered certain of our customers who purchased da Vinci S Surgical Systems in the first quarter of 2009 the opportunity to upgrade their recently purchased da Vinci S Surgical Systems to da Vinci Si Surgical Systems at a discount to the list price of our upgrade. The upgrade program also provided our customers the opportunity to return their recently purchased da Vinci S camera accessories and receive a credit towards the purchase of da Vinci Si camera or other accessories. These customers were given until June 30, 2009 to accept our offer. Total revenue in an amount equal to the discount, of approximately $20.1 million, was deferred in the first quarter of 2009. During the second quarter of 2009, we recognized $13.8 million of revenue from offers declined, upgrades completed or accessories delivered. We expect to be able to complete all accepted da Vinci Si system upgrade offers and recognize the remaining $6.3 million deferred revenue by the end of 2009.

 

20


Table of Contents

Second Quarter 2009 Financial Highlights

 

   

Procedures grew approximately 52% during the second quarter of 2009, compared to the second quarter of 2008.

 

   

Total revenue, including the $13.8 million recognized from the upgrade offer, increased to $260.6 million from $219.2 million during the second quarter of 2008.

 

   

Recurring revenue increased 33% to $137.1 million from $103.0 million during the second quarter of 2008.

 

   

Instruments and accessories revenue, including $1.4 million of the $13.8 million recognized from the upgrade offer, increased to $95.8 million from $73.6 million during the second quarter of 2008.

 

   

System revenue, including $12.4 million of the $13.8 million recognized from the upgrade offer, increased to $123.5 million from $116.2 million during the second quarter of 2008.

 

   

We sold 76 da Vinci Surgical Systems during the second quarter of 2009 compared with 85 in the second quarter of 2008. 47 of the 76 systems sold were the recently launched da Vinci Si model.

 

   

As of June 30, 2009, we had a da Vinci Surgical System installed base of 1,242 systems, 916 in the United States, 221 in Europe, and 105 in the rest of the world.

 

   

Operating income, including the $13.8 million recognized from the upgrade offer, increased to $99.5 million, or 38% of revenue, during the second quarter of 2009 from $78.2 million, or 36% of revenue, during the second quarter of 2008. Operating income included $24.6 million and $19.7 million during the second quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense for the estimated fair value of employee stock options and stock purchases.

 

   

We ended the second quarter of 2009 with $902.1 million in cash, cash equivalents and investments, an increase of $80.4 million from the end of the first quarter of 2009.

Procedure adoption

We believe the adoption of da Vinci surgery occurs surgical procedure by surgical procedure, and it is being adopted for those procedures which offer significant patient value. The value of a surgical procedure to a patient is higher if it offers superior clinical outcomes, less surgical trauma, or both.

The procedures that have driven the most growth in our business recently are the da Vinci Prostatectomy (dVP) and the da Vinci Hysterectomy (dVH). Other urologic procedures such as da Vinci Nephrectomy, da Vinci Cystectomy and da Vinci Pyeloplasty, other gynecologic procedures such as da Vinci Myomectomy and da Vinci Sacral Colpopexy, cardiothoracic procedures such as da Vinci Mitral Valve Repair and da Vinci Revascularization, and various general surgery procedures have also contributed to our growth. We anticipate total 2009 procedures to grow over 45% from approximately 136,000 procedures performed in 2008.

Technology Acquisitions

We continue to make several strategic acquisitions of intellectual property. Total investments in intellectual property during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $8.0 million and $20.0 million, and $25.7 million and $30.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Amortization expenses related to purchased intellectual property for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $4.0 million and $2.4 million, and $7.6 million, and $3.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

21


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income information (in thousands):

 

     Three months Ended June 30,     Six months Ended June 30,  
     2009    % of total
revenue
    2008    % of total
revenue
    2009    % of total
revenue
    2008    % of total
revenue
 

Revenue:

                    

Products

   $ 219,346    84   $ 189,780    87   $ 368,396    82   $ 350,731    86

Services

     41,278    16     29,409    13     80,600    18     56,652    14
                                                    

Total revenue

     260,624    100     219,189    100     448,996    100     407,383    100
                                                    

Cost of revenue:

                    

Products

     55,542    21     50,036    23     100,808    22     94,888    23

Services

     14,897    6     13,097    6     29,299    7     26,632    7
                                                    

Total cost of revenue

     70,439    27     63,133    29     130,107    29     121,520    30
                                                    

Products gross profit

     163,804    63     139,744    64     267,588    60     255,843    63

Services gross profit

     26,381    10     16,312    7     51,301    11     30,020    7
                                                    

Gross profit

     190,185    73     156,056    71     318,889    71     285,863    70
                                                    

Operating expenses:

                    

Selling, general, and administrative

     67,276    26     57,504    26     129,642    29     106,138    26

Research and development

     23,369    9     20,357    9     44,681    10     36,658    9
                                                    

Total operating expenses

     90,645    35     77,861    35     174,323    39     142,796    35
                                                    

Income from operations

     99,540    38     78,195    36     144,566    32     143,067    35

Interest and other income, net

     5,171    2     5,707    3     10,187    2     14,248    4
                                                    

Income before taxes

     104,711    40     83,902    39     154,753    34     157,315    39

Income tax expense

     42,323    16     32,720    15     64,223    14     61,352    15
                                                    

Net income

   $ 62,388    24   $ 51,182    24   $ 90,530    20   $ 95,963    24
                                                    

Total Revenue

Total revenue increased to $260.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $219.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, revenue increased to $449.0 million from $407.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. During the second quarter of 2009, as described previously, we recognized $13.8 million of $20.1 million revenue that was originally deferred in the first quarter of 2009 in association with da Vinci Si launch. First half of 2009 revenue growth was driven by the continued adoption of da Vinci surgery. We believe that robotic surgery will be adopted surgical procedure by surgical procedure. Our revenue growth during the periods presented reflects adoption progress made in all of our target procedures. dVP has been our highest volume procedure to date, while dVH has been one of our fastest growing procedures since 2006. dVP and dVH have represented more than 75% of our total procedures over the past several years. An increasing body of clinical evidence has indicated that dVP offers superior surgical outcomes compared to traditional open prostatectomy in the critical categories of cancer removal, continence, and sexual potency. Favorable clinical results have been reported in hysterectomies for cancerous pathology, which include increased lymph node retrieval counts and significant reduction in blood transfusions. For most patients, a minimally invasive approach using the da Vinci Surgical System offers reduced pain, less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, reduced post-operation complications and a quicker return to normal daily activities.

Revenue within the United States accounted for 78% and 77% of total revenue for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and 80% and 78% of total revenue for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively. We believe domestic revenue accounts for the large majority of total revenue primarily due to the competitive nature of the domestic healthcare market.

 

22


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our revenue and da Vinci Surgical System unit sales for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands, except percentages and unit sales):

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2009     2008     2009     2008  

Revenue

        

Instruments and accessories

   $ 95,827      $ 73,632      $ 175,355      $ 135,473   

Systems

     123,519        116,148        193,041        215,258   
                                

Total product revenue

     219,346        189,780        368,396        350,731   

Services

     41,278        29,409        80,600        56,652   
                                

Total revenue

   $ 260,624      $ 219,189      $ 448,996      $ 407,383   
                                

Recurring revenue

   $ 137,105      $ 103,041      $ 255,955      $ 192,125   
                                

% of total revenue

     53     47     57     47

Domestic

   $ 202,815      $ 175,051      $ 344,713      $ 319,077   

International

     57,809        44,138        104,283        88,306   
                                

Total revenue

   $ 260,624      $ 219,189      $ 448,996      $ 407,383   
                                

% of Revenue - Domestic

     78     80     77     78

% of Revenue - International

     22     20     23     22

Domestic Unit Sales

     56        66        100        120   

International Unit Sales

     20        19        42        39   
                                

Total Unit Sales

     76        85        142        159   
                                

Product Revenue

Product revenue increased to $219.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared with $189.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Second quarter 2009 product revenue included recognition of $13.8 million of revenue that was originally deferred in the first quarter of 2009 associated with da Vinci Si launch described above.

Instruments and accessories revenue increased to $95.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared with $73.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The increase in revenue was primarily driven by an increase in procedures performed. Procedure growth occurred in all of our targeted procedures with hysterectomy and prostatectomy being the largest drivers of growth. Instruments and accessories revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2009 included recognition of $1.4 million of the total $2.1 million of accessories revenue deferred in the first quarter of 2009 associated with da Vinci Si upgrade program described above.

Instruments and accessories revenue per procedure declined approximately 15% during the second quarter of 2009 compared with the second quarter of 2008 due to multiple factors. First, there were fewer initial stocking orders of instruments and accessories as we sold fewer systems during the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008, and stocking orders continue to represent a smaller portion of total instruments and accessories revenue as our installed base grows. Second, our average revenue per procedure has gradually declined due to customers becoming more efficient in their use of instruments and accessories and a gradual growth in the mix of procedures that require fewer instruments such as benign dVH procedures. We expect our average revenue per procedure to fluctuate quarter to quarter due to variations in stocking orders and customer buying patterns.

Systems revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $123.5 million compared with $116.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008. The increase was primarily due to recognition of $12.4 million of system revenue deferred from the first quarter of 2009, higher average selling prices (ASP’s) resulting from the impact of the higher-priced single and dual console da Vinci Si Surgical Systems, partially offset by fewer system sales. Excluding the impact of our deferral in the first quarter of 2009 of $18.0 million and revenue recognized in the second quarter of 2009 of $12.4 million, our ASP for three months ended June 30, 2009 was $1.43 million, compared to $1.35 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. We sold 76 da Vinci Surgical Systems during the second quarter of 2009, compared with 85 in the same period last year. 47 of the 76 systems sold during the second quarter of 2009 were the da Vinci Si Surgical Systems, of which 5 systems were dual console configurations.

 

23


Table of Contents

Product revenue was $368.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared with $350.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Product revenue in the first half of 2009 reflects the remaining unrecognized $6.3 million of revenue deferrals in connection with the da Vinci Si Surgical System launch described above.

Instruments and accessories revenue increased $175.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared with $135.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The increase for the six months ended June 30, 2009 resulted from the same factors as the three months ended June 30, 2009.

Systems revenue was $193.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared with $215.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to $5.6 million remaining unrecognized system revenue deferral as a result of the da Vinci Si upgrade offers and lower system unit sales. We sold 142 da Vinci Surgical Systems during the first half of 2009, compared with 159 in the same period last year.

Service Revenue

Service revenue, comprised primarily of system service, increased 40% to $41.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared with $29.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. We typically enter into service contracts at the time systems are sold. These service contracts have been generally renewed at the end of the service period. Higher service revenue for second quarter of 2009 was driven by a larger base of da Vinci Surgical Systems producing contract service revenue. There were approximately 1,171 and 867 systems installed, entering the second quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively, generating an average of $35,000 and $34,000 per system for each quarter, respectively.

Service revenue increased 42% to $80.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared with $56.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Higher first six months of 2009 service revenue was driven by a larger base of da Vinci Surgical Systems producing contract service revenue.

Gross Profit

Product gross profit during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 was $163.8 million, or 74.7% of product revenue, and $267.6 million, or 72.6% of product revenue, respectively, compared with $139.7 million, or 73.6% of product revenue, and $255.8 million, or 72.9% of product revenue, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. The higher product gross profit was driven by higher 2009 product revenue, as described above. The higher product gross profit percentage for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was driven by $13.8 million of da Vinci Si deferred revenue recognized and product material costs reductions. The lower product gross profit percentage for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was driven by the remaining $6.3 million of da Vinci Si deferred revenue, partially offset by product material costs reductions.

Service gross profit during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 was $26.4 million, or 63.9% of service revenue, and $51.3 million, or 63.6% of service revenue, respectively, compared with $16.3 million, or 55.5% of service revenue, and $30.0 million, or 53.0% of service revenue, during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively. The higher 2009 service gross profit was driven by higher revenue generated from a larger installed base. The higher 2009 gross service profit percentage was driven by leveraging service costs across a larger base of installed systems, lower service parts consumption and repair costs per system, and reduced customer training center costs.

Total gross profit during the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $190.2 million, or 73.0% of total revenue, compared to $128.7 million, or 68.3% of total revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2009, and $156.1 million, or 71.2% of total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Since there was no cost deferred in association with the deferred revenue related to the da Vinci Si upgrade offer, the $20.1 million of revenue deferred during the first quarter of 2009 and the $13.8 million of revenue recognized during the second quarter of 2009 had equal impacts on gross profit, operating income and pretax income. Excluding the impact of the da Vinci Si deferred revenue during the first quarter of 2009 and subsequent recognition during the second quarter of 2009 , the total gross profit margin percentage was 71.5%, 71.4%, and 71.2% of total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2009, March 31, 2009, and June 30, 2008 respectively.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses include costs for sales, marketing and administrative personnel, tradeshow expenses, legal expenses, regulatory fees and general corporate expenses.

 

24


Table of Contents

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 increased 17% to $67.3 million compared with $57.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased 22% to $129.6 million compared with $106.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The increases are due to organizational growth to support our expanding business, higher commissions related to higher revenue levels, and increased stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation expense charged to sales, general and administrative expenses for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $15.5 million and $29.9 million, and $12.4 million and $21.4 million, respectively.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses include costs associated with the design, development, testing and enhancement of our products. These enhancements represent significant improvements to our products.

Research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 increased 15% to $23.4 million compared with $20.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased 22% to $44.7 million compared with $36.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The increases are due to the growth in our research and development organization, stock-based compensation expense and higher amortization expenses of purchased intellectual property. Amortization expense related to purchased intellectual property during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was $3.8 million compared to $2.2 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Amortization expense related to purchased intellectual property during the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $7.2 million compared to $3.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008. Stock-based compensation expense increased to approximately $5.5 million and $10.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared with $4.4 million and $7.7 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. We expect to continue to make substantial investments in research and development and anticipate that research and development expense will continue to increase in the future.

Interest and Other Income, Net

Interest and other income, net for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $5.2 million compared with $5.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The change was primarily due to declining market interest rates associated with our marketable securities.

Interest and other income, net for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $10.2 million, which was $4.0 million less than $14.2 million recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The change was primarily due to declining market interest rates and the impact of funding the $150 million stock repurchase announced during the first quarter of fiscal 2009.

Income Tax Expense

We provide for income taxes during interim periods based on our estimate of the effective tax rate for the year. Discrete items and changes in our estimate of the annual effective tax rate are recorded in the period in which they occur. We recognize interest related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.

Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $42.3 million, or 40.4% of pre-tax income, compared with $32.7 million, or 39.0% of pre-tax income for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $64.2 million, or 41.5% of pre-tax income, compared with $61.3 million, or 39.0% of pre-tax income for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to state income taxes and non-deductible stock option expenses, partially offset by 2009 research and development (“R&D”) credits and domestic production deductions. The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 differs from the federal statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes and non-deductible stock option expenses, partially offset by domestic production deductions.

A California tax law change enacted in February 2009 allows an elective single sales factor for state apportionment for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2011. We expect to benefit from the California single sale factor election for apportioning income for years 2011 and beyond. As a result of its anticipated election of the single sales factor, in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” we re-measured our deferred tax assets taking into account the reversal pattern and the expected California tax rate under the elective single sales factor. The impact of this change resulted in a decrease to California beginning deferred tax assets of $1.6 million and this charge was recorded in our income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

 

25


Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2009, we had total gross unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $51.0 million compared with approximately $42.0 million as of December 31, 2008, representing an increase of approximately $9.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Of the total gross unrecognized tax benefits, $49.9 million, if recognized, would reduce our effective tax rate in the period of recognition.

We file federal, state and foreign income tax returns in many jurisdictions in the United States and abroad. For U.S. federal and California income tax purposes, the statute of limitations currently remain open for all years since inception due to utilization of net operating losses and R&D credits generated in prior years.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Sources and Uses of Cash

Our principal source of liquidity is cash provided by operations and the exercise of stock options. Cash and cash equivalents plus short and long-term investments increased from $901.9 million at December 31, 2008 to $902.1 million at June 30, 2009, including the $150.0 million stock repurchase. Cash generation is one of our fundamental strengths and provides us with substantial financial flexibility in meeting our operating, investing and financing needs.

Consolidated Cash Flow Data

 

     Six Months
Ended June 30,
 
     2009     2008  
     (in thousands)  

Net cash provided by (used in)

  

Operating activities

   $ 173,113      $ 104,185   

Investing activities

     (57,434     (63,600

Financing activities

     (136,976     58,898   

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents

     95        715   
                

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   $ (21,202   $ 100,198   
                

Operating Activities

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, cash flow from operating activities of $173.1 million exceeded our net income of $90.5 million for two primary reasons:

 

  1. Our net income included substantial non-cash charges in the form of stock-based compensation, amortization of intangible assets, taxes, and depreciation. These non-cash charges totaled $55.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009.

 

  2. Cash provided by working capital and other assets during the six months ended June 30, 2009 was approximately $26.9 million.

Working capital is comprised primarily of deferred revenue and other current liabilities. Deferred revenue increased by $10.3 million or 13% during the six months ended June 30, 2009 related to the increase in the number of installed systems for which service contracts exist and due to the deferral associated with the da Vinci Si upgrade offers. Other liabilities including accounts payable, accrued compensation and employee benefits, and accrued liabilities increased by $21.5 million or 17% during the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to timing of vendor payments.

For the six months ended June 30, 2008, cash flow from operating activities of $104.2 million exceeded our net income of $96.0 million due to:

 

  1. Non-cash charges to our net income in the form of stock-based compensation, amortization of intangible assets, taxes, and depreciation. These non-cash charges totaled $39.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008.

 

  2. Partially offset by $31.7 million of investments in working capital for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

 

26


Table of Contents

Accounts receivable increased by $31.7 million or 24% during the six months ended June 30, 2008 reflecting increased revenue and the timing of system sales. Inventory increased by $10.2 million or 31% during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The increase in 2008 reflects inventory necessary to support growth in our business and inventory associated with the start up of our Mexican manufacturing operations. Deferred revenue increased by $11.4 million or 21% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 which is primarily related to the increase in the number of installed systems for which service contracts exist. Other liabilities including accounts payable, accrued compensation and employee benefits, and accrued liabilities decreased by $5.6 million or 6% during the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to the timing of vendor payments.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 consisted primarily of purchases of investments (net of proceeds from sales and maturities of investments) of $17.1 million and $11.6 million respectively, and, capital expenditures and acquisitions of intellectual property of $40.3 million and $52.0 million respectively. We invest predominantly in high quality, fixed income securities. Our investment portfolio may at any time contain investments in U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agency securities, taxable and/or tax exempt municipal notes (some of which may have an auction reset feature), corporate notes and bonds, commercial paper, and money market funds. We are not a capital intensive business.

Financing Activities

Net cash used by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2009 consisted primarily of proceeds from stock option exercises and employee stock purchases of $12.1 million and payment of $150.0 million for the repurchase of 1.4 million shares of our common stock through the accelerated share repurchase program. As of June 30, 2009, we had $150.0 million remaining under the board authorized amount of stock repurchases. Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2008 consisted primarily of proceeds from stock option exercises and employee stock purchases of $23.3 million and excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $35.6 million.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our critical accounting policies and estimates. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes in our market risk during the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the disclosures in Part II, Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in SEC Rule 13a-15(e), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act of 1934 reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

 

27


Table of Contents

As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

 

28


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in various ordinary and routine legal proceedings and disputes that arise in the normal course of business. These matters include product liability actions, patent infringement actions, contract disputes, and other matters. We do not know whether we will prevail in these matters nor can we assure that any remedy could be reached on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Based on currently available information, we believe that we have meritorious defenses to these actions and that the resolution of these cases is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or future results of operations. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” we record a liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impacts of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

With the exception of the new risk factors below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

WE MAY INCUR LOSSES ASSOCIATED WITH CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS AND MAY NOT BE ABLE TO EFFECTIVELY HEDGE OUR EXPOSURE.

Our operating results are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We attempt to mitigate a portion of these risks through foreign currency hedging, based on our judgment of the appropriate trade-offs among risk, opportunity and expense. We have established a hedging program to partially hedge our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations primarily for the Euro. We regularly review our hedging program and make adjustments as necessary based on the judgment factors discussed above. Our hedging activities may not offset more than a portion of the adverse financial impact resulting from unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates, which could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

HEALTHCARE REFORMS, CHANGES IN HEALTHCARE POLICIES AND CHANGES TO THIRD-PARTY REIMBURSEMENTS MAY AFFECT DEMAND FOR OUR PRODUCTS

The U. S. government has in the past, is currently considering and may in the future, consider healthcare policies and proposals intended to curb rising healthcare costs, including those that could significantly affect both private and public reimbursement for healthcare services. State and local governments, as well as a number of foreign governments, are also considering or have adopted similar types of policies. Future significant changes in the healthcare systems in the United States or elsewhere, and current uncertainty about whether and how changes may be implemented, could have a negative impact on the demand for our products and services and our business. These include changes that may reduce reimbursement rates for procedures using our products and changes that may be proposed or implemented by the current U.S. Presidential administration or Congress. It is unclear which, if any, of the various U.S. healthcare reforms currently being discussed and/or proposed might be enacted by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by the President. We are unable to predict what healthcare reform legislation or regulations, if any, will be enacted in the United States or elsewhere; whether other healthcare legislation or regulations affecting our business may be proposed or enacted in the future; what effect any legislation or regulation would have on our business; or the effect ongoing uncertainty about these matters will have on the purchasing decisions of our customers.

 

29


Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(c) Stock Repurchases

On March 4, 2009, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of up to $300.0 million of the Company’s common stock. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock under this publicly announced program. See Note 7 of our Notes to unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our stock repurchase program.

 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

 

30


Table of Contents
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 22, 2009, the stockholders of the Company elected Lonnie M. Smith, Gary S. Guthart, and Mark J. Rubash to the Board of Directors of the Company to terms expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders in the year 2012. The following table sets forth the votes for each director:

 

     Votes For    Withheld

Lonnie M. Smith

   33,321,558    898,167

Gary S. Guthart

   33,816,202    403,523

Mark J. Rubash

   32,809,702    1,410,023

After the meeting, our Board of Directors consisted of Alan J. Levy, Eric H. Halvorson, D. Keith Grossman, Robert W. Duggan, Floyd D. Loop, George Stalk Jr., Lonnie M. Smith, Gary S. Guthart, and Mark J. Rubash,

 

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

 

31


Table of Contents
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit
Number

  

Description

  3.1    Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2009).
  3.2    Amended and Restated Bylaws of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2009).
10.1    Amendment to Employment Agreement between Lonnie Smith and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. executed June 1, 2009.
10.2    Form of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 2000 Equity Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement (Incentive and Nonstatutory Stock Options)
31.1    Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2    Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1    Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2    Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101    The following materials from Intuitive Surgical, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

Users of the XBRL data are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

 

32


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.
(Registrant)
By:   /s/ MARSHALL L. MOHR
  Marshall L. Mohr
  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: July 23, 2009

 

33