UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For Quarterly Period Ended April 30, 2012
¨ | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-8597
The Cooper Companies, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 94-2657368 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
6140 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 590, Pleasanton, CA 94588
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code (925) 460-3600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one).
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.): Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, $.10 par value |
48,140,727 Shares | |
Class |
Outstanding at April 30, 2012 |
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
Page No. | ||||||
PART I. |
||||||
Item 1. |
||||||
Consolidated Statements of Income Three and Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 |
3 | |||||
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets April 30, 2012 and October 31, 2011 |
4 | |||||
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows Six Months Ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 |
5 | |||||
6 | ||||||
7 | ||||||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
19 | ||||
Item 3. |
32 | |||||
Item 4. |
32 | |||||
PART II. |
||||||
Item 1. |
34 | |||||
Item 1A. |
35 | |||||
Item 2. |
35 | |||||
Item 6. |
36 | |||||
37 | ||||||
38 |
2
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
Periods Ended April 30,
(In thousands, except for earnings per share)
(Unaudited)
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 344,589 | $ | 325,301 | $ | 670,649 | $ | 618,530 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
123,893 | 123,539 | 239,500 | 240,162 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
220,696 | 201,762 | 431,149 | 378,368 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
136,962 | 126,382 | 268,710 | 239,835 | ||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
13,031 | 10,390 | 24,455 | 20,117 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
5,263 | 4,734 | 10,816 | 9,447 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
65,440 | 60,256 | 127,168 | 108,969 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
3,071 | 4,268 | 6,733 | 11,219 | ||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
0 | 16,487 | 0 | 16,487 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
310 | 219 | 992 | (514 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
62,679 | 39,720 | 121,427 | 80,749 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
7,758 | 4,360 | 11,883 | 6,174 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 54,921 | $ | 35,360 | $ | 109,544 | $ | 74,575 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 1.15 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 2.30 | $ | 1.61 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 1.12 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 2.24 | $ | 1.56 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Number of shares used to compute earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
47,708 | 46,506 | 47,691 | 46,242 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted |
49,007 | 48,239 | 48,941 | 47,807 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 7,745 | $ | 5,175 | ||||
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,324 at April 30, 2012 and $4,826 at October 31, 2011 |
202,882 | 214,779 | ||||||
Inventories |
286,069 | 253,584 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
33,226 | 33,684 | ||||||
Prepaid expense and other current assets |
46,361 | 33,125 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
576,283 | 540,347 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
979,085 | 955,980 | ||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
385,482 | 346,775 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
593,603 | 609,205 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Goodwill |
1,275,444 | 1,276,567 | ||||||
Other intangibles, net |
118,077 | 128,341 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
20,237 | 21,828 | ||||||
Other assets |
44,917 | 48,230 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 2,628,561 | $ | 2,624,518 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Short-term debt |
$ | 44,216 | $ | 52,979 | ||||
Accounts payable |
54,926 | 61,755 | ||||||
Employee compensation and benefits |
42,380 | 48,790 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes |
2,507 | 2,828 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
84,096 | 100,854 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
228,125 | 267,206 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Long-term debt |
275,092 | 327,453 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
19,008 | 20,127 | ||||||
Accrued pension liability and other |
68,380 | 72,244 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
590,605 | 687,030 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 11) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, 10 cents par value, shares authorized: 1,000; zero shares issued or outstanding |
0 | 0 | ||||||
Common stock, 10 cents par value, shares authorized: 70,000; issued 48,915 at April 30, 2012 and 48,015 at October 31, 2011 |
4,892 | 4,802 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
1,218,238 | 1,180,250 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(21,068 | ) | (18,110 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
881,259 | 773,136 | ||||||
Treasury stock at cost: 774 shares at April 30, 2012 and 169 shares at October 31, 2011 |
(45,365 | ) | (2,590 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Stockholders equity |
2,037,956 | 1,937,488 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 2,628,561 | $ | 2,624,518 | |||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended April 30,
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 109,544 | $ | 74,575 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
52,570 | 46,405 | ||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
0 | 16,487 | ||||||
Decrease in operating capital |
(59,847 | ) | (14,911 | ) | ||||
Other non-cash items |
19,924 | 15,266 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
122,191 | 137,822 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(43,057 | ) | (52,016 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired, and other |
(647 | ) | (36,599 | ) | ||||
Insurance proceeds received |
4,740 | 0 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(38,964 | ) | (88,615 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Payment of contingent consideration |
(1,314 | ) | 0 | |||||
Net repayments of short-term debt |
(8,762 | ) | (2,562 | ) | ||||
Repayments of long-term debt |
(628,750 | ) | (1,104,905 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
576,388 | 1,037,465 | ||||||
Dividends on common stock |
(1,421 | ) | (1,385 | ) | ||||
Debt acquisition costs |
0 | (9,524 | ) | |||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(46,143 | ) | 0 | |||||
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation arrangements |
5,576 | 0 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock for employee stock plans |
23,857 | 36,165 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(80,569 | ) | (44,746 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(88 | ) | 396 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
2,570 | 4,857 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period |
5,175 | 3,573 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period |
$ | 7,745 | $ | 8,430 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Periods Ended April 30,
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 54,921 | $ | 35,360 | $ | 109,544 | $ | 74,575 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
8,521 | 21,617 | (3,313 | ) | 21,790 | |||||||||||
Change in value of derivative instruments, net of tax |
365 | (2,538 | ) | 284 | (2,396 | ) | ||||||||||
Additional minimum pension liability, net of tax |
7 | 7 | 15 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of tax |
19 | 0 | 56 | 0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
8,912 | 19,086 | (2,958 | ) | 19,409 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 63,833 | $ | 54,446 | $ | 106,586 | $ | 93,984 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
6
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1. General
The Cooper Companies, Inc. (Cooper, we or the Company) is a global medical device company publicly traded on the NYSE Euronext (NYSE:COO). Cooper is dedicated to serving the needs of the healthcare professional, improving the quality of life for its employees and customers and providing competitive products. Cooper operates through our business units, CooperVision and CooperSurgical.
| CooperVision produces a broad range of monthly, two-week and single-use contact lenses, featuring advanced materials and optics. CooperVision brings a commitment to solving the toughest vision challenges such as astigmatism, presbyopia and ocular dryness; with a broad collection of spherical, toric and multifocal contact lenses. |
| CooperSurgical develops, manufactures and markets medical devices and procedure solutions to improve healthcare delivery to women in any clinical setting. |
The unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements presented in this report contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly Coopers consolidated condensed financial position at April 30, 2012 and October 31, 2011, the consolidated results of its operations for the three and six months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 and its consolidated condensed cash flows for the six months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011. Most of these adjustments are normal and recurring. However, certain adjustments associated with acquisitions and the related financial arrangements are of a nonrecurring nature. Readers should not assume that the results reported here either indicate or guarantee future performance.
During interim periods, we follow the accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011. Please refer to this when reviewing this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Management estimates and judgments are an integral part of financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). We believe that the critical accounting policies listed below address the more significant estimates required of management when preparing our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. We consider an accounting estimate critical if changes in the estimate may have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We believe that the accounting estimates employed are appropriate and resulting balances are reasonable; however, actual results could differ from the original estimates, requiring adjustment to these balances in future periods. The accounting policies that reflect our more significant estimates, judgments and assumptions and which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results are:
| Revenue recognition |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts |
| Net realizable value of inventory |
| Valuation of goodwill |
| Business combinations |
| Income taxes |
| Share-based compensation |
7
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Continued
(Unaudited)
During the fiscal first half of 2012, there were no significant changes in our estimates and critical accounting policies. Please refer to Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, for a more complete discussion of our estimates and critical accounting policies.
Note 2. Inventories
(In thousands) |
April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | ||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 67,724 | $ | 62,832 | ||||
Work-in-process |
12,746 | 15,440 | ||||||
Finished goods |
205,599 | 175,312 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 286,069 | $ | 253,584 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed using standard cost that approximates actual cost, on a first-in, first-out basis.
Note 3. Intangible Assets
Goodwill
(In thousands) |
CooperVision | CooperSurgical | Total | |||||||||
Balance as of October 31, 2010 |
$ | 1,044,272 | $ | 217,704 | $ | 1,261,976 | ||||||
Net additions during the year ended October 31, 2011 |
952 | 12,272 | 13,224 | |||||||||
Translation |
1,363 | 4 | 1,367 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance as of October 31, 2011 |
1,046,587 | 229,980 | 1,276,567 | |||||||||
Net additions during the six-month period ended April 30, 2012 |
260 | (120 | ) | 140 | ||||||||
Translation |
(1,216 | ) | (47 | ) | (1,263 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance as of April 30, 2012 |
$ | 1,045,631 | $ | 229,813 | $ | 1,275,444 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
We performed our annual impairment test in our fiscal third quarter of 2011, and our analysis indicated that we had no impairment of goodwill. As described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, we will continue to monitor conditions and changes which could indicate that our recorded goodwill may be impaired.
8
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Continued
(Unaudited)
Other Intangible Assets
As of April 30, 2012 | As of October 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization & Translation |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization & Translation |
||||||||||||
Trademarks |
$ | 3,204 | $ | 1,517 | $ | 3,204 | $ | 1,431 | ||||||||
Technology |
110,283 | 67,142 | 109,896 | 62,525 | ||||||||||||
Shelf space and market share |
110,296 | 53,479 | 110,296 | 47,861 | ||||||||||||
License and distribution right and other |
23,782 | 7,350 | 23,782 | 7,020 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
247,565 | $ | 129,488 | 247,178 | $ | 118,837 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Less accumulated amortization and translation |
129,488 | 118,837 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
$ | 118,077 | $ | 128,341 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
We estimate that amortization expense for our existing other intangible assets will average $20.6 million per year in the three-year period ending October 31, 2014, and average $11.7 million in the two succeeding years ending October 31, 2016.
Note 4. Debt
(In thousands) |
April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | ||||||
Short-term: |
||||||||
Overdraft and other credit facilities |
$ | 31,716 | $ | 40,479 | ||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
12,500 | 12,500 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 44,216 | $ | 52,979 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Long-term: |
||||||||
Credit agreement |
$ | 274,875 | $ | 327,225 | ||||
Other |
217 | 228 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 275,092 | $ | 327,453 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement: See Note 13. Subsequent Event for details on our recent amendment to this credit agreement. On January 12, 2011, Cooper refinanced its existing syndicated Senior Unsecured Revolving Line of Credit (Revolver) with a new Credit Agreement that provides for a multicurrency revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $750.0 million and an amortizing term loan facility in an original principal amount of $250.0 million, each of which, unless terminated earlier, mature on January 12, 2016. In addition, we have the ability from time to time to increase the revolving credit facility by up to an additional $250.0 million. KeyBank led the refinancing with certain banks that participated in the Revolver retaining or increasing their participation in the Credit Agreement.
9
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Continued
(Unaudited)
At April 30, 2012, we had $696.8 million available under the Credit Agreement.
Amounts outstanding under the new Credit Agreement bear interest, at our option, at either the base rate, which is a rate per annum equal to the greatest of (a) KeyBanks prime rate, (b) one-half of one percent in excess of the federal funds effective rate and (c) one percent in excess of the adjusted Eurodollar rate for a one-month interest period on such day, or the Eurodollar or adjusted foreign currency rate, plus, in each case, an applicable margin in respect of base rate loans and in respect of Eurodollar or adjusted foreign currency rate loans. The applicable margins are determined quarterly based upon our ratio of consolidated funded indebtedness to consolidated proforma EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement.
We pay an annual commitment fee that ranges from 0.15% to 0.50% of the unused portion of the revolving credit facility depending on our ratio of consolidated funded indebtedness to consolidated proforma EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement. In addition to this annual commitment fee, we are also required to pay certain letter of credit and related fronting fees and other administrative fees pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement.
The Credit Agreement is not secured by any of its, or any of its subsidiaries, assets. All obligations under the Credit Agreement will be guaranteed by each of our existing and future direct and indirect material domestic subsidiaries.
The term loan facility will amortize in equal quarterly installments as follows, with the remainder due on the term loan maturity date: 5% of the aggregate principal amount of the term loan for the first three years following the closing date and 10% of the aggregate principal amount of the term loan for the fourth and fifth years following the closing date.
Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, we are also required to maintain specified financial ratios:
| The ratio of Consolidated Proforma EBITDA to Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined, Interest Coverage Ratio) be at least 3.00 to 1.00 at all times. |
| The ratio of Consolidated Funded Indebtedness to Consolidated Proforma EBITDA (as defined, Total Leverage Ratio) be no higher than 3.75 to 1.00. |
At April 30, 2012, we were in compliance with the Interest Coverage Ratio at 30.86 to 1.00 and the Total Leverage Ratio at 0.80 to 1.00.
In our fiscal first quarter of 2011, we wrote off about $0.3 million of debt issuance costs in interest expense as a result of extinguishing the Revolver. The remaining $0.5 million of existing debt issuance costs and the $9.5 million of costs incurred to refinance the Credit Agreement are carried in other assets and amortized to interest expense over the life of the Credit Agreement.
Senior Notes: On January 31, 2007, we issued $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.125% Senior Notes (the Notes) due February 15, 2015, of which none were outstanding during fiscal 2012. The Notes paid interest semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year, beginning August 15, 2007. The Notes were offered in a private placement to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.
On January 12, 2011, we provided formal notice, and on February 15, 2011, we redeemed all $339.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Notes in accordance with the terms of the
10
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Continued
(Unaudited)
Indenture among the Company, the guarantors party thereto and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which the Notes were issued. In accordance with the Indenture, the redemption price for the Notes was 103.563% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to February 15, 2011, the redemption date. Due to the redemption of all outstanding Notes, we no longer disclose financial information for guarantor and non-guarantor subsidiaries.
In our fiscal second quarter of 2011, we recorded a $16.5 million loss on the repurchase that includes the write-off of about $4.4 million of unamortized costs and the redemption premium of $12.1 million related to the Notes on our Consolidated Statement of Income. We paid the aggregate purchase price from borrowings under the new Credit Agreement, including $250.0 million from the term loan facility.
Note 5. Income Taxes
Coopers effective tax rate (ETR) (provision for income taxes divided by pretax income) for the fiscal first half of 2012 was 9.8%. Our year-to-date results include the projected fiscal year ETR, plus any discrete items. The ETR used to record the provision for income taxes for the fiscal first half of 2011 was 7.6%. The ETR is below the United States statutory rate as a majority of our income is earned in foreign jurisdictions with lower tax rates.
We recognize the benefit from a tax position only if it is more likely than not that the position would be sustained upon audit based solely on the technical merits of the tax position. As of November 1, 2011, the Company had total gross unrecognized tax benefits of $27.4 million. If recognized, $27.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the Companys ETR. For the six-month period ended April 30, 2012, there were no material changes to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits.
Interest and penalties of $1.6 million have been reflected as a component of the total liability as of November 1, 2011. It is the Companys policy to recognize the items of interest and penalties directly related to income taxes as additional income tax expense.
Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at November 1, 2011, is $9.0 million related to tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts could significantly change during the next twelve months. This amount represents a decrease in unrecognized tax benefits related to the settlement of litigation in the U.S. Tax Court and expiring statutes in various jurisdictions worldwide and is comprised of transfer pricing, Subpart F and other items.
As of April 30, 2012, the tax years for which the Company remains subject to United States Federal income tax assessment upon examination are 2008 through 2011. The Company remains subject to income tax examinations in other major tax jurisdictions including the United Kingdom, France and Australia for the tax years 2007 through 2011.
11
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Continued
(Unaudited)
On April 1, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a Notice of Deficiency to the Company in connection with its audit of the Companys income tax returns for the years 2005 and 2006. The Notice asserted that the Company is subject to additional taxes due for its tax year 2005 under the anti-deferral provisions of Subpart F of the Internal Revenue Code. A settlement concerning the 2005 claimed deficiency was subsequently reached with District Counsel for the IRS which effectively settled all related matters. The decision document was filed with the U.S. Tax Court on January 19, 2012, with an agreed net deficiency of about $50 thousand.
Note 6. Earnings Per Share
Periods Ended April 30, | Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 54,921 | $ | 35,360 | $ | 109,544 | $ | 74,575 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares |
47,708 | 46,506 | 47,691 | 46,242 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 1.15 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 2.30 | $ | 1.61 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares |
47,708 | 46,506 | 47,691 | 46,242 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options |
1,299 | 1,733 | 1,250 | 1,565 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted weighted average common shares |
49,007 | 48,239 | 48,941 | 47,807 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 1.12 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 2.24 | $ | 1.56 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth stock options to purchase Coopers common stock that were not included in the diluted net income per share calculation because their effect would have been antidilutive for the periods presented:
Periods Ended April 30, | Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except exercise prices) |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Numbers of stock option shares excluded |
10 | 1,232 | 99 | 1,255 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Range of exercise prices |
$ | 80.51 | $ | 67.65-$80.51 | $ | 73.40-$80.51 | $ | 62.60-$80.51 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Continued
(Unaudited)
Note 7. Share-Based Compensation Plans
The Company has several share-based compensation plans that are described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011. The compensation expense and related income tax benefit recognized in the Companys consolidated financial statements for share-based awards were as follows:
Periods Ended April 30, | Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
$ | 4.2 | $ | 3.2 | $ | 10.7 | $ | 7.9 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized in inventory |
0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total compensation expense |
$ | 4.9 | $ | 3.8 | $ | 12.7 | $ | 9.2 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Related income tax benefit |
$ | 1.5 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 4.0 | $ | 2.8 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Stockholders Equity
Share Repurchases
On December 15, 2011, we announced that the Companys Board of Directors authorized the 2012 Share Repurchase Program of up to $150.0 million of the Companys common stock. This program runs through December 31, 2012, and may be discontinued at any time. Purchases under the 2012 Share Repurchase Program are subject to a review of the circumstances in place at the time and will be made from time to time as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements. No shares were repurchased in the three-month period ended April 30, 2012. During the six months ended April 30, 2012, the Company repurchased 663 thousand shares of the Companys common stock for $46.1 million, at an average purchase price of $69.60 per share. The Company did not repurchase any shares during fiscal 2011. At April 30, 2012, approximately $103.9 million remained authorized for repurchase under the 2012 Share Repurchase Program.
Dividends
We paid a semiannual dividend of approximately $1.4 million or 3 cents per share on February 7, 2012, to stockholders of record on January 25, 2012.
Note 9. Fair Value Measurements
As of April 30, 2012 and October 31, 2011, the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, lines of credit, accounts payable and other current liabilities approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of such instruments and the ability to obtain financing on similar terms.
13
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Continued
(Unaudited)
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), applies to all assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported at fair value and defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. An assets or liabilitys level is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be valued and disclosed in one of the following three levels of the valuation hierarchy:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting the reporting entitys own assumptions.
The Company has derivative assets and liabilities that include interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps and foreign currency forward contracts. The impact of the counterpartys creditworthiness when in an asset position and the Companys creditworthiness when in a liability position has also been factored into the fair value measurement of the derivative instruments. Both the counterparty and the Company are expected to continue to perform under the contractual terms of the instruments.
We may use interest rate swaps to maintain our desired mix of fixed-rate and variable-rate debt. The swaps exchange fixed and variable rate payments without exchanging the notional principal amount of the debt. The Company has elected to use the income approach to value the derivatives using observable Level 2 market expectations at the measurement date and standard valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount assuming that participants are motivated, but not compelled to transact. Level 2 inputs are limited to quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, specifically Eurodollar futures contracts up to three years, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability - specifically LIBOR cash and swap rates and credit risk at commonly quoted intervals. Mid-market pricing is used as a practical expedient for fair value measurements.
We may use foreign exchange forward contracts to minimize, to the extent reasonable and practical, our exposure to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. The Company has elected to use the income approach to value the derivatives, using observable Level 2 market expectations at the measurement date and standard valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount assuming that participants are motivated but not compelled to transact. Level 2 inputs for the valuations are limited to quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability - specifically LIBOR cash rates, credit risk at commonly quoted intervals, foreign exchange spot rates and forward points. Mid-market pricing is used as a practical expedient for fair value measurements.
The following table sets forth the Companys financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 2 inputs during the fiscal first half of 2012, within the fair value hierarchy at April 30, 2012, and fiscal year 2011, within the fair value hierarchy at October 31, 2011:
(In millions) |
April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | ||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
$ | 0.4 | $ | 0.5 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
$ | 4.2 | $ | 4.6 | ||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
0.4 | 0.4 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 4.6 | $ | 5.0 | |||||
|
|
|
|
14
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Continued
(Unaudited)
Note 10. Employee Benefits
Coopers Retirement Income Plan (Plan), a defined benefit plan, covers substantially all full-time United States employees. Coopers contributions are designed to fund normal cost on a current basis and to fund the estimated prior service cost of benefit improvements. The unit credit actuarial cost method is used to determine the annual cost. Cooper pays the entire cost of the Plan and funds such costs as they accrue. Virtually all of the assets of the Plan are comprised of equities and participation in equity and fixed income funds.
Coopers results of operations for the three and six months ended April 30, 2012 and 2011 reflect the following components of net periodic pension costs:
Periods Ended April 30, | Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 1,234 | $ | 1,187 | $ | 2,468 | $ | 2,374 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
764 | 743 | 1,527 | 1,487 | ||||||||||||
Expected returns on assets |
(856 | ) | (736 | ) | (1,712 | ) | (1,472 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
6 | 6 | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of transition obligation |
5 | 5 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss |
281 | 188 | 563 | 376 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 1,434 | $ | 1,393 | $ | 2,868 | $ | 2,787 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company contributed to the pension plan $1.2 million and $2.2 million for the three and six months ended April 30, 2012, respectively, and expects to contribute an additional $3.0 million in fiscal 2012. The Company contributed to the pension plan $1.2 million and $2.0 million for the three and six months ended April 30, 2011. The expected rate of return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost is 8.5%.
Note 11. Contingencies
Legal Proceedings
Securities Litigation
On November 28, 2011, Harold Greenberg filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 4:11-cv-05697-YGR, against the following defendants: the Company; Robert S. Weiss, its President, Chief Executive Officer and a director; Eugene J. Midlock, its former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and Albert G. White, III, its Vice President of Investor Relations, Treasurer and Chief Strategic Officer. On December 12, 2011, a second individual, Ross Wallen, filed a related complaint against the same defendants in the Northern District of California, Case No. 4:11-cv-06214-YGR. The Wallen complaint largely repeats the allegations in the Greenberg complaint. Greenberg and Wallen each sought to represent a class of persons who purchased the Companys common stock between March 4, 2011 and November 15, 2011.
15
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Continued
(Unaudited)
On February 29, 2012, the court ordered the Greenberg and Wallen actions consolidated and appointed Universal-Investment-Gesellschaft mbH Lead Plaintiff. On May 4, 2012, the lead plaintiff filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint, which alleges that the Company, Robert S. Weiss and Eugene J. Midlock violated Sections 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act by, among other things, making misrepresentations with an intent to deceive investors concerning the safety of the Avaira® Toric and Avaira Sphere contact lenses, which the Company recalled in 2011. The Consolidated Amended Complaint seeks unspecified damages on behalf of the purported class.
On June 1, 2012, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, which is scheduled for hearing on August 7, 2012. Discovery is stayed pending a resolution of motions to dismiss. The Company is not in a position to assess whether any loss or adverse effect on the Companys financial condition is probable or remote or to estimate the range of potential loss, if any.
Derivative Litigation
On January 9, 2012, Joseph Operman filed a purported shareholder derivative complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 4:12-cv-00143-YGR, against members of the Companys board of directors. The derivative complaint seeks recovery on behalf of the Company, which is named as a nominal defendant. The derivative complaint purports to allege causes of action for breach of fiduciary duties and failure to exercise oversight responsibilities against all defendants and a cause of action for contribution against Mr. Weiss for alleged violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On May 18, 2012, Operman filed an Amended Derivative Complaint. The amended derivative complaint largely repeats the allegations of misrepresentations in the securities class action complaints described above, and includes allegations of false projections of future financial results. The Company and the individual defendants have not yet filed a response to the derivative complaint. The parties have agreed, pending approval by the Court, to extend the deadline for responding to the derivative complaint until after the court rules on the defendants motion to dismiss in the class action.
Note 12. Business Segment Information
Cooper uses operating income, as presented in our financial reports, as the primary measure of segment profitability. We do not allocate costs from corporate functions to segment operating income. Items below operating income are not considered when measuring the profitability of a segment. We use the same accounting policies to generate segment results as we do for our consolidated results.
Identifiable assets are those used in continuing operations except cash and cash equivalents, which we include as corporate assets. Long-lived assets are property, plant and equipment.
16
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Continued
(Unaudited)
Segment information:
Periods Ended April 30, | Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
CooperVision net sales by category: |
||||||||||||||||
Toric lens |
$ | 89,374 | $ | 84,882 | $ | 171,165 | $ | 160,669 | ||||||||
Multifocal lens |
22,280 | 18,083 | 43,042 | 34,712 | ||||||||||||
Single-use sphere lens |
62,616 | 58,922 | 123,062 | 111,870 | ||||||||||||
Non single-use sphere and other eye care products and other |
113,737 | 113,404 | 219,671 | 211,669 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total CooperVision net sales |
288,007 | 275,291 | 556,940 | 518,920 | ||||||||||||
CooperSurgical net sales |
56,582 | 50,010 | 113,709 | 99,610 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 344,589 | $ | 325,301 | $ | 670,649 | $ | 618,530 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
CooperVision |
$ | 57,787 | $ | 55,932 | $ | 113,908 | $ | 100,734 | ||||||||
CooperSurgical |
16,534 | 12,200 | 32,185 | 24,469 | ||||||||||||
Headquarters |
(8,881 | ) | (7,876 | ) | (18,925 | ) | (16,234 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating income |
65,440 | 60,256 | 127,168 | 108,969 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
3,071 | 4,268 | 6,733 | 11,219 | ||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
0 | 16,487 | 0 | 16,487 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
310 | 219 | 992 | (514 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 62,679 | $ | 39,720 | $ | 121,427 | $ | 80,749 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | ||||||
Identifiable assets: |
||||||||
CooperVision |
$ | 2,211,275 | $ | 2,206,068 | ||||
CooperSurgical |
355,743 | 354,020 | ||||||
Headquarters |
61,543 | 64,430 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 2,628,561 | $ | 2,624,518 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Geographic information:
Periods Ended April 30, | Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands) |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Net sales to external customers by country of domicile: |
||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 164,668 | $ | 154,470 | $ | 314,798 | $ | 288,205 | ||||||||
Europe |
96,162 | 95,500 | 189,913 | 184,404 | ||||||||||||
Rest of world |
83,759 | 75,331 | 165,938 | 145,921 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 344,589 | $ | 325,301 | $ | 670,649 | $ | 618,530 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | ||||||
Long-lived assets by country of domicile: |
||||||||
United States |
$ | 362,845 | $ | 373,211 | ||||
Europe |
221,864 | 226,665 | ||||||
Rest of world |
8,894 | 9,329 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 593,603 | $ | 609,205 | ||||
|
|
|
|
17
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, Concluded
(Unaudited)
Note 13. Subsequent Event
On May 31, 2012, Cooper entered into an amendment (Amendment) to our Credit Agreement, dated as of January 12, 2011, by and among the Company, CooperVision International Holding Company, LP, the lenders party thereto and KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent. The Credit Agreement provided for a multicurrency revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $750.0 million and a delayed draw term loan facility in an original principal amount of $250.0 million. Concurrently with the effectiveness of the Amendment, and pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, we repaid in full the outstanding term loan.
The Amendment also modified certain provisions of the Credit Agreement. Significant modifications include an increase in the aggregate commitment amount under the revolving credit facility to $1.0 billion; amending the amount by which the aggregate commitment amount under the revolving facility may be increased, upon written request by Cooper, to $500.0 million; and the extension of the termination date of the Credit Agreement to May 31, 2017.
The Amendment also amended the commitment fee rate to a range between 0.100% and 0.275% of the unused portion of the revolving facility based on a pricing grid tied to our total leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and amended the applicable margin rates such that the loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement will bear interest based, at our option, on either the base rate or the adjusted Eurodollar rate or adjusted foreign currency rate (each as defined in the Credit Agreement), plus an applicable margin of between 0.00% and 0.75% in respect of base rate loans and between 1.00% and 1.75% in respect of adjusted Eurodollar rate or adjusted foreign currency rate loans, in each case in accordance with a pricing grid tied to our total leverage ratio.
In our fiscal third quarter of 2012, we will record a charge of about $1.4 million of debt issuance costs in interest expense as a result of amending the Credit Agreement. The remaining $6.0 million of existing debt issuance costs and the approximately $1.3 million of costs incurred to amend the Credit Agreement are carried in other assets and amortized to interest expense over the life of the Credit Agreement.
18
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
Note numbers refer to Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements in Item 1. Financial Statements.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These include statements relating to plans, prospects, goals, strategies, future actions, events or performance and other statements which are other than statements of historical fact. In addition, all statements regarding anticipated growth in our revenue, anticipated effects of any product recalls, anticipated market conditions, planned product launches and expected results of operations and integration of any acquisition are forward-looking. To identify these statements look for words like believes, expects, may, will, should, could, seeks, intends, plans, estimates or anticipates and similar words or phrases. Forward-looking statements necessarily depend on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Among the factors that could cause our actual results and future actions to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements are:
| Adverse changes in global or regional general business, political and economic conditions due to the current global economic downturn, including the impact of continuing uncertainty and instability of certain European Union countries which could adversely affect our global markets. |
| Reduced sales, loss of customers, and costs and expenses related to the recall of certain lots of the Avaira® Toric and Avaira Sphere contact lenses. |
| Foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations including the risk of further declines in the value of the euro that would decrease our revenues and earnings. |
| A major disruption in the operations of our manufacturing, research and development or distribution facilities, due to technological problems, natural disasters or other causes. |
| Disruptions in supplies of raw materials, particularly components used to manufacture our silicone hydrogel lenses. |
| Legal costs, insurance expenses, settlement costs and the risk of an adverse decision or settlement related to product liability, patent protection or other litigation. |
| Changes in tax laws or their interpretation and changes in effective tax rates. |
| Limitations on sales following new product introductions due to poor market acceptance. |
| New competitors, product innovations or technologies. |
| The impact of acquisitions or divestitures on revenues, earnings or margins. |
| Interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. |
19
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, Continued
| The requirement to provide for a significant liability or to write off, or accelerate depreciation on, a significant asset, including goodwill. |
| Changes in U.S. and foreign government regulation of the retail optical industry and of the healthcare industry generally. |
| Failures to receive, or delays in receiving, U.S. or foreign regulatory approvals for products. |
| Failure to obtain adequate coverage and reimbursement from third party payors for our products. |
| Compliance costs and potential liability in connection with U.S. and foreign healthcare regulations, including product recalls, and potential losses resulting from sales of counterfeit and other infringing products. |
| The success of the Companys research and development activities and other start-up projects. |
| Dilution to earnings per share from acquisitions or issuing stock. |
| Changes in accounting principles or estimates. |
| Environmental risks. |
| Other events described in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including the Business and Risk Factors sections in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, as such Risk Factors may be updated in quarterly filings. |
We caution investors that forward-looking statements reflect our analysis only on their stated date. We disclaim any intent to update them except as required by law.
20
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, Continued
Results of Operations
In this section, we discuss the results of our operations for the fiscal second quarter of 2012 and compare them with the same period of fiscal 2011. We discuss our cash flows and current financial condition under Capital Resources and Liquidity.
Second Quarter Highlights
| Net sales of $344.6 million, up 6% from $325.3 million. |
| Gross profit $220.7 million, up 9% from $201.8 million. |
| Operating income $65.4 million, up 9% from $60.3 million. |
| Diluted earnings per share of $1.12, up from 73 cents per share. |
| Cash provided by operations $80.6 million, up from $64.9 million. |
Six-Month Highlights
| Net sales of $670.6 million, up 8% from $618.5 million. |
| Gross profit $431.1 million, up 14% from $378.4 million. |
| Operating income $127.2 million, up 17% from $109.0 million. |
| Diluted earnings per share of $2.24, up from $1.56 cents per share. |
| Cash provided by operations $122.2 million, down from $137.8 million. |
Outlook
Overall, we remain optimistic about the long-term prospects for the worldwide contact lens and womens healthcare markets. However, events affecting the economy as a whole, including the uncertainty and instability of global markets driven by employment, housing and credit concerns together with the European debt crisis and related foreign currency volatility impacts our current performance and continue to represent a risk to our forecasted performance for fiscal year 2012 and beyond.
We compete in the worldwide contact lens market with our spherical, toric and multifocal contact lenses offered in a variety of materials including using phosphorylcholine (PC) Technology and silicone hydrogel Aquaform® Comfort Science technology. We believe that there will be lower contact lens wearer dropout rates as technology improves and enhances the wearing experience through a combination of improved designs and materials and the growth of preferred modalities such as single-use and monthly wearing options. CooperVision is focused on greater worldwide market penetration as we roll out new products and continue to expand our presence in existing and emerging markets, including through acquisitions.
Sales of contact lenses utilizing silicone hydrogel materials, a major product material in the industry, have grown significantly. CooperVision markets monthly silicone hydrogel spherical, toric and multifocal lens products under our Biofinity® brand and two-week silicone hydrogel spherical and toric lens products under our Avaira brand. In fiscal 2011, we launched our Biofinity spherical silicone hydrogel lens in Japan and our Biofinity multifocal lens globally. Competitive silicone hydrogel single-use lens products are gaining market share and represent a risk to our business. We have not yet marketed a silicone hydrogel single-use product. Our ability to compete successfully with a full range of silicone hydrogel products is an important factor to achieving our projected future levels of sales growth and profitability.
21
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, Continued
In August 2011, CooperVision initiated a recall on limited lots of Avaira Toric contact lenses, and in November 2011, this recall was expanded to cover limited lots of Avaira Sphere contact lenses. While Avaira Toric was taken off of the market, Avaira Sphere remained on the market throughout the recall. On April 15, 2012, the FDA granted us a Special 501(k) clearance to return Avaira Toric lenses to the market and in May 2012, CooperVision relaunched Avaira Toric with shipments available for select distribution. Avaira Toric and Avaira Sphere lenses that were subject to the recall represented less than 2% of the Companys fiscal 2011 net sales.
We are also in the process of developing a number of new contact lens products to enhance CooperVisions worldwide product lines. We recently launched Proclear® 1 Day multifocal. New products planned for introduction over the next two years include additional lenses utilizing silicone hydrogel and PC Technology materials and new lens designs, including multifocal and single-use lenses.
The medical device segment of the womens healthcare market is highly fragmented. CooperSurgical has steadily grown its market presence and distribution system by developing products and acquiring products and companies that complement its business model. On June 4, 2012, we announced the voluntary tender offer to acquire all the issued and outstanding shares and warrants of Origio a/s, Oslo Stock Exchange (OSE: ORO), for NOK 28 per share. The tender offer is set to expire June 22, 2012, unless the tender offer is extended. Origios Board of Directors recommends that shareholders accept the tender offer. If the tender offer is successful, the transaction is anticipated to close during our fiscal third quarter 2012. Cooper, through its subsidiaries, plans to finance the acquisition with available off-shore cash and credit facilities. Origio is a global in-vitro fertilization (IVF) medical device company that develops, manufactures and distributes highly specialized products that target IVF treatment with a goal to make fertility treatment safer, more efficient and convenient. Based in Malov, Denmark, Origio has approximately 320 employees and generated sales of DKK 370 million, approximately US$65.0 million, in 2011.
On May 31, 2012, we entered into an amendment to our senior unsecured Credit Agreement. The aggregate commitment of the Senior Unsecured Revolving Line of Credit was increased to $1.0 billion from $750.0 million, and the $234.4 million outstanding balance on the term loan was fully repaid using the new revolving facility. This facility offers additional availability, lower interest rates and extends the maturity date to May 31, 2017 from January 12, 2016. In addition, we have the ability to increase the revolving credit facility by up to an additional $500.0 million. KeyBank led the refinancing with certain banks that participated in the Credit Agreement retaining or increasing their participation in the Revolver.
At April 30, 2012, we had $696.8 million available under the existing Credit Agreement. We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, cash flow from operating activities and borrowing capacity under existing credit facilities will fund operations both in the next 12 months and in the longer term as well as current and long-term cash requirements for capital expenditures, acquisitions, share repurchases and cash dividends.
22
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, Continued
Selected Statistical Information Percentage of Sales and Growth
Percentage of Sales | Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Periods Ended April 30, |
2012 | 2011 | % Change | 2012 | 2011 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
100 | % | 100 | % | 6 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 8 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
36 | % | 38 | % | | 36 | % | 39 | % | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
64 | % | 62 | % | 9 | % | 64 | % | 61 | % | 14 | % | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
40 | % | 39 | % | 8 | % | 40 | % | 39 | % | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
4 | % | 3 | % | 25 | % | 4 | % | 3 | % | 22 | % | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
1 | % | 1 | % | 11 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | 14 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
19 | % | 19 | % | 9 | % | 19 | % | 18 | % | 17 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
Coopers two business units, CooperVision and CooperSurgical, generate all of its sales.
| CooperVision produces a broad range of monthly, two-week and single-use contact lenses, featuring advanced materials and optics. CooperVision brings a commitment to solving the toughest vision challenges such as astigmatism, presbyopia and ocular dryness; with a broad collection of spherical, toric and multifocal contact lenses. |
| CooperSurgical develops, manufactures and markets medical devices and procedure solutions to improve healthcare delivery to women in any clinical setting. |
Our consolidated net sales grew by $19.3 million or 6% and $52.1 million or 8% in the three and six months ended April 30, 2012, respectively:
Periods Ended April 30, |
Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | % Change | 2012 | 2011 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
CooperVision |
$ | 288.0 | $ | 275.3 | 5 | % | $ | 556.9 | $ | 518.9 | 7 | % | ||||||||||||
CooperSurgical |
56.6 | 50.0 | 13 | % | 113.7 | 99.6 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 344.6 | $ | 325.3 | 6 | % | $ | 670.6 | $ | 618.5 | 8 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CooperVision Net Sales
The contact lens market has two major product categories:
| Spherical lenses including lenses that correct near- and farsightedness uncomplicated by more complex visual defects. |
| Toric and multifocal lenses including lenses that, in addition to correcting near- and farsightedness, address more complex visual defects such as astigmatism and presbyopia by adding optical properties of cylinder and axis, which correct for irregularities in the shape of the cornea. |
23
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, Continued
In order to achieve comfortable and healthy contact lens wear, products are sold with recommended replacement schedules, often defined as modalities, with the primary modalities being single-use, two-week and monthly. CooperVision offers spherical, aspherical, toric, multifocal and toric multifocal lens products in most modalities.
The contact lens market consists primarily of disposable and frequently replaced lenses. Disposable lenses are designed for either daily, two-week or monthly replacement; frequently replaced lenses are designed for replacement after one to three months. Significantly, the market for spherical lenses is growing with value-added spherical lenses to alleviate dry eye symptoms as well as lenses with aspherical optical properties or higher oxygen permeable lenses such as silicone hydrogels.
CooperVisions Proclear brand aspheric, toric and multifocal contact lenses, manufactured using PC Technology, help enhance tissue/device compatibility and offer improved lens comfort.
CooperVisions Biofinity brand silicone hydrogel spherical, toric and multifocal contact lenses and Avaira brand spherical and toric products are manufactured using proprietary Aquaform technology to increase oxygen transmissibility for longer wear. We believe that it is important to develop a full range of multifocal and single-use silicone hydrogel products due to increased pressure from silicone hydrogel products offered by our major competitors.
Net sales growth in the three-month period includes increases in single-use spheres up 6% and total spheres up 2%. Total toric lenses grew 5%, including 20% growth of single-use toric lenses, and multifocal lenses grew 23% compared to the prior year period. Silicone hydrogel products grew 29%. Proclear single-use sphere lenses grew 13% as total Proclear products declined 4%. Older conventional lens products and cosmetic lenses declined 12% and 5%, respectively.
CooperVision competes in the worldwide soft contact lens market and services three primary regions: the Americas, EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) and Asia Pacific.
CooperVision Net Sales by Geography
Periods Ended April 30, | Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) |
2012 | 2011 | % Change | 2012 | 2011 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 122.0 | $ | 117.3 | 4 | % | $ | 228.0 | $ | 213.5 | 7 | % | ||||||||||||
EMEA |
98.0 | 97.2 | 1 | % | 193.4 | 187.9 | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
68.0 | 60.8 | 12 | % | 135.5 | 117.5 | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 288.0 | $ | 275.3 | 5 | % | $ | 556.9 | $ | 518.9 | 7 | % | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CooperVisions worldwide net sales grew 5% in the three-month period and grew 7% in the six-month period. Americas net sales grew 4% and 7% in the three- and six-month periods, respectively, primarily due to market gains of CooperVisions silicone hydrogel lenses, up 24% in the three-month period and 30% in the six-month period, and single-use lenses, up 14% in the three month period and 17% in the six-month period. EMEA net sales grew 1% and 3% driven by increases in sales of silicone hydrogel lenses, up 26% and 29% in the three- and six-month periods, respectively. EMEA net sales growth in both current year periods was negatively impacted due to the weakening of the euro and the British pound compared to the U.S. dollar. Net sales to the Asia Pacific region grew 12% and 15% in the three- and six-month periods, primarily due to sales growth of single-use lenses, up 10% and 13%, and silicone hydrogel lenses, up 114% and 110%, in each of the respective three- and six-month periods. Asia Pacific net sales growth in both current year periods was positively impacted by the strengthening of the Japanese yen and Australian dollar compared to the U.S. dollar.
24
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, Continued
CooperVisions net sales growth was driven primarily by increases in the volume of lenses sold and introduction of new products, primarily silicone hydrogel lenses together with acquisitions. While unit growth and product mix have influenced CooperVisions sales growth, average realized prices by product have not materially influenced sales growth.
CooperSurgical Net Sales
CooperSurgicals net sales increased 13% and 14% in the three- and six-month periods to $56.6 million and $113.7 million, respectively, with net sales growth excluding acquisitions of 8% and 9%, respectively. Sales of products used in surgical procedures grew 22% in the current year three-month period and now represent 39% of CooperSurgicals sales compared to 36% in the prior year period. CooperSurgicals sales are primarily comprised of womens healthcare products used by gynecologists and obstetricians in both office and surgical procedures. The balance consists of sales of medical devices outside of womens healthcare which CooperSurgical does not actively market. Unit growth and product mix along with increased average realized prices on disposable products have influenced organic sales growth.
Cost of Sales/Gross Profit
Gross Profit Percentage of Net Sales Periods Ended April 30, |
Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
CooperVision |
63 | % | 61 | % | 64 | % | 61 | % | ||||||||
CooperSurgical |
68 | % | 65 | % | 68 | % | 64 | % | ||||||||
Consolidated |
64 | % | 62 | % | 64 | % | 61 | % |
The increases in CooperVisions gross margin are largely attributable to improvements in manufacturing efficiencies and product mix, primarily the shift to higher margin silicone hydrogel products. Gross margin also reflects efficiencies associated with the 2009 CooperVision Manufacturing restructuring plan that was completed in the fiscal first quarter of 2011. There were no costs associated with this plan recorded in the current year periods and $1.9 million recorded as cost of sales in the prior fiscal year six-month period.
The increase in CooperSurgicals gross margin for the fiscal first half of 2012 is largely attributable to manufacturing efficiency improvements and product mix including higher margins on products used in surgical procedures that represented 39% of net sales in the current year period compared to 36% in the prior year period.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense (SGA)
Three Months Ended April 30, ($ in millions) |
2012 | % Net Sales |
2011 | % Net Sales |
% Change |
|||||||||||||||
CooperVision |
$ | 109.6 | 38 | % | $ | 101.2 | 37 | % | 8 | % | ||||||||||
CooperSurgical |
18.5 | 33 | % | 17.3 | 35 | % | 7 | % | ||||||||||||
Headquarters |
8.9 | N/A | 7.9 | N/A | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 137.0 | 40 | % | $ | 126.4 | 39 | % | 8 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
25
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, Continued
Six Months Ended April 30, ($ in millions) |
2012 | % Net Sales |
2011 | % Net Sales |
% Change |
|||||||||||||||
CooperVision |
$ | 212.0 | 38 | % | $ | 189.7 | 37 | % | 12 | % | ||||||||||
CooperSurgical |
37.8 | 33 | % | 33.9 | 34 | % | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
Headquarters |
18.9 | N/A | 16.2 | N/A | 17 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 268.7 | 40 | % | $ | 239.8 | 39 | % | 12 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The increase in CooperVisions SGA both in dollars and as a percentage of net sales in the fiscal 2012 periods are primarily due to our investment in sales and marketing, including increased headcount, to reach new customers and to promote our silicone hydrogel products.
The increase in CooperSurgicals SGA in the fiscal 2012 periods are primarily due to our increased investment in sales activities to promote our products, with emphasis on products used in surgical procedures, and to support anticipated further growth.
Corporate headquarters SGA increased in the fiscal 2012 periods primarily due to increased headcount and share-based compensation costs.
Research and Development Expense
Three Months Ended April 30, ($ in millions) |
2012 | % Net Sales |
2011 | % Net Sales |
% Change |
|||||||||||||||
CooperVision |
$ | 11.0 | 4 | % | $ | 9.0 | 3 | % | 23 | % | ||||||||||
CooperSurgical |
2.0 | 4 | % | 1.4 | 3 | % | 41 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 13.0 | 4 | % | $ | 10.4 | 3 | % | 25 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended April 30, ($ in millions) |
2012 | % Net Sales |
2011 | % Net Sales |
% Change |
|||||||||||||||
CooperVision |
$ | 20.7 | 4 | % | $ | 17.2 | 3 | % | 20 | % | ||||||||||
CooperSurgical |
3.8 | 3 | % | 2.9 | 3 | % | 30 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 24.5 | 4 | % | $ | 20.1 | 3 | % | 22 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
CooperVision research and development expense increased in absolute dollars and as a percentage of sales in the fiscal 2012 periods primarily due to investments in new technologies, clinical trials and increased headcount. CooperVisions research and development activities include programs to develop single-use silicone hydrogel products and products utilizing PC Technology.
CooperSurgical research and development expense increased in absolute dollars in the fiscal 2012 periods, primarily due to investments in the design and upgrade of surgical procedure devices.
Amortization Expense
The increases of 11% and 14% in the three- and six-month periods in amortization expense are due to intangible assets from acquisitions completed in fiscal 2011.
26
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, Continued
Operating Income
Three Months Ended April 30, ($ in millions) |
2012 | % Net Sales |
2011 | % Net Sales |
% Change |
|||||||||||||||
CooperVision |
$ | 57.8 | 20 | % | $ | 55.9 | 20 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||
CooperSurgical |
16.5 | 29 | % | 12.3 | 24 | % | 36 | % | ||||||||||||
Headquarters |
(8.9 | ) | N/A | (7.9 | ) | N/A | (13 | %) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 65.4 | 19 | % | $ | 60.3 | 19 | % | 9 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended April 30, ($ in millions) |
2012 | % Net Sales |
2011 | % Net Sales |
% Change |
|||||||||||||||
CooperVision |
$ | 113.9 | 20 | % | $ | 100.7 | 19 | % | 13 | % | ||||||||||
CooperSurgical |
32.2 | 28 | % | 24.5 | 25 | % | 32 | % | ||||||||||||
Headquarters |
(18.9 | ) | N/A | (16.2 | ) | N/A | (17 | %) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
$ | 127.2 | 19 | % | $ | 109.0 | 18 | % | 17 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The increases in consolidated operating income in the fiscal 2012 periods in absolute dollars were primarily due to the increases in gross profit of 9% and 14% for the three- and six-month periods, respectively, partially offset by the increase in operating expenses of 10% and 13% in the same periods, respectively.
Interest Expense
Interest expense in the fiscal second quarter of 2012 was $3.1 million representing a decrease of 28% from the prior year period. Interest expense for the first six months of fiscal 2012 was $6.7 million representing a decrease of 40% from the first six months of fiscal 2011. The decreases primarily reflects lower average debt in the current periods and a reduction in our long-term borrowings used for capital expenditures together with the redemption of our 7.125% Senior Notes in February 2011.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
In our fiscal second quarter of 2011, we recorded a $16.5 million loss related to the repurchase of all outstanding Senior Notes that includes the write-off of about $4.4 million of unamortized costs and the redemption premium of $12.1 million on our Consolidated Statement of Income.
Share Repurchase
In December 2011, we announced a $150.0 million share repurchase plan authorized by the Companys Board of Directors. No shares were repurchased in the three-month period ended April 30, 2012. During the fiscal first half ended April 30, 2012, we repurchased 663 thousand shares of our common stock for $46.1 million at an average purchase price of $69.60. As of April 30, 2012, we had remaining authorization to repurchase $103.9 million of our common stock. See Note 8. Stockholders Equity to our unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.
27
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, Continued
Other Income (Expense), Net
Periods Ended April 30, | Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
$ | 0.1 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.3 | $ | (0.4 | ) | |||||||
Other, net |
0.2 | (0.1 | ) | 0.7 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 0.3 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 1.0 | $ | (0.5 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
We recorded income tax expense of $11.9 million in the fiscal first half of 2012 compared to $6.2 million in the prior year period. Coopers effective tax rate (ETR) (provision for income taxes divided by pretax income) for the fiscal first half of 2012 was 9.8%. Our year-to-date results include the projected fiscal year ETR, plus any discrete items. The ETR used to record the provision for income taxes for the fiscal first half of 2011 was 7.6%.
The ETR is below the United States statutory rate as a majority of our income is earned in foreign jurisdictions with lower tax rates reflecting the shift in the geographic mix of income during recent periods with income earned in foreign jurisdictions increasing as compared to income earned in the United States. As a result, the ratio of domestic income to worldwide income primarily within CooperVision has decreased over recent fiscal periods. A reduction in the ratio of domestic income to worldwide income effectively lowers the overall tax rate due to the fact that the tax rates in the majority of foreign jurisdictions where the Company operates are significantly lower than the statutory rate in the United States.
On April 1, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a Notice of Deficiency to the Company in connection with its audit of the Companys income tax returns for the years 2005 and 2006. The Notice asserted that the Company is subject to additional taxes due for its tax year 2005 under the anti-deferral provisions of Subpart F of the Internal Revenue Code. A settlement concerning the 2005 claimed deficiency was subsequently reached with District Counsel for the IRS which effectively settled all related matters. The decision document was filed with the U.S. Tax Court on January 19, 2012, with an agreed net deficiency of about $50 thousand.
Share-Based Compensation Plans
The Company has several share-based compensation plans that are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011. The compensation expense and related income tax benefit recognized in our consolidated financial statements for share-based awards were as follows:
Periods Ended April 30, | Three Months | Six Months | ||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
$ | 4.2 | $ | 3.2 | $ | 10.7 | $ | 7.9 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized in inventory |
0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total compensation expense |
$ | 4.9 | $ | 3.8 | $ | 12.7 | $ | 9.2 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Related income tax benefit |
$ | 1.5 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 4.0 | $ | 2.8 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, Continued
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Second Quarter Highlights
| Operating cash flow $80.6 million vs. $64.9 million in the fiscal second quarter of 2011. |
| Expenditures for purchases of property, plant and equipment (PP&E) $23.1 million vs. $23.2 million in the prior year period. |
| Total debt decreased to $319.3 million from $410.3 million at January 31, 2012. |
Six-Month Highlights
| Operating cash flow $122.2 million vs. $137.8 million in the fiscal first half of 2011. |
| Expenditures for purchases of property, plant and equipment (PP&E) $43.1 million vs. $52.0 million in the prior year period. |
| Total debt decreased to $319.3 million from $380.4 million at October 31, 2011. |
Comparative Statistics
($ in millions) |
April 30, 2012 | October 31, 2011 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 7.7 | $ | 5.2 | ||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,628.6 | $ | 2,624.5 | ||||
Working capital |
$ | 348.2 | $ | 273.1 | ||||
Total debt |
$ | 319.3 | $ | 380.4 | ||||
Stockholders equity |
$ | 2,038.0 | $ | 1,937.5 | ||||
Ratio of debt to equity |
0.16:1 | 0.20:1 | ||||||
Debt as a percentage of total capitalization |
14 | % | 16 | % | ||||
Operating cash flow - twelve months ended |
$ | 320.7 | $ | 336.3 |
Working Capital
The increase in working capital at April 30, 2012, was primarily due to increases in inventory and other current assets and decreases in accounts payable, other accrued liabilities and short-term debt. This increase was partially offset by decreases in trade accounts receivable and deferred tax assets.
The $32.5 million increase in inventory was primarily due to increased production to support new product launches and in anticipation of the re-launch of Avaira Toric contact lenses. At April 30, 2012, Coopers inventory months on hand (MOH) were 6.9 representing an increase from 6.1 at April 30, 2011. The $11.9 million decrease in trade accounts receivable was primarily due to timing of collections. Our days sales outstanding (DSO) decreased to 53 days at April 30, 2012 from 54 days in the prior year period. Based on our experience and knowledge of our customers and our analysis of inventoried products and product levels, we believe that our reported accounts receivable and inventories are recoverable.
We have reviewed our needs in the United States for possible repatriation of undistributed earnings or cash of its foreign subsidiaries. The Company presently intends to continue to indefinitely invest all earnings and cash outside of the United States of all foreign subsidiaries to fund foreign investments or meet foreign working capital and property, plant and equipment requirements.
29
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, Continued
Operating Cash Flow
Cash flow provided by operating activities continued in the fiscal first half of 2012 as Coopers major source of liquidity, at $122.2 million compared to $137.8 million in the prior year period. Current period results include $109.5 million of net income which included non-cash items of $52.6 million for depreciation and amortization, $12.0 million related to share-based compensation and $2.8 million related to currency translation. Results also include changes in operating assets and liabilities, which primarily reflected the increase in inventories of $32.5 million, the decrease in accounts receivable of $11.9 million and decreases in accounts payable and other accrued expenses of $29.4 million.
For the six months ended April 30, 2012, our primary source of cash flows provided by operating activities was cash collections from our customers for purchase of our products. Our primary uses of cash flows from operating activities were for personnel and material costs along with cash payments of $7.1 million and $6.6 million for interest and income tax, respectively, and the $10.0 million single lump-sum payment, accrued in fiscal 2011, to settle the Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. lawsuit under the agreement reached December 2, 2011.
For the six months ended April 30, 2011, our primary source of cash flows provided by operating activities was cash collections from our customers for purchase of our products. Our primary uses of cash flows provided by operating activities were for personnel and material costs along with cash payments of $16.2 million and $1.2 million for interest and income tax, respectively.
Investing Cash Flow
Cash used in investing activities of $39.0 million in the fiscal first half of 2012 was for capital expenditures of $43.1 million, primarily to increase manufacturing capacity, and payments of $0.6 million related to acquisitions, partially offset by $4.7 million insurance recovery related to facility repairs.
Cash used in investing activities of $88.6 million in the fiscal first half of 2011 was for capital expenditures of $52.0 million, primarily to improve manufacturing efficiency, and payments of $36.6 million related to acquisitions.
Financing Cash Flow
The changes in cash flows from financing activities primarily relate to borrowings and payments of debt as well as share-based compensation awards and share repurchases. Cash used in financing activities of $80.6 million in the fiscal first half of 2012 was driven by $46.1 million in payments for share repurchases in our fiscal first quarter of 2012, under the plan discussed above, net payments of debt of $61.1 million, dividends paid on our common stock of $1.4 million and a $1.3 million payment for contingent consideration partially offset by $29.4 million from the exercise of share-based compensation awards.
Cash used in financing activities of $44.7 million in the fiscal first half of 2011 was driven by net repayments of debt of $70.0 million, payments for acquisition costs related to the Credit Agreement of $9.5 million and dividends paid on our common stock of $1.4 million, partially offset by proceeds of $36.2 million from the exercise of share-based compensation awards.
30
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, Concluded
At April 30, 2012, we had $696.8 million available under the Credit Agreement, and we are in compliance with the financial covenants including the Interest Coverage Ratio and Total Leverage Ratio at 30.86 to 1.00 versus the requirement to be at least 3.00 to 1.00 and 0.80 to 1.00 versus the requirement to remain below 3.75 to 1.00, respectively. As defined in the Credit Agreement, the Interest Coverage Ratio is the ratio of Consolidated Proforma EBITDA to Consolidated Interest Expense and the Total Leverage Ratio is the ratio of Consolidated Funded Indebtedness to Consolidated Proforma EBITDA.
Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies
Management estimates and judgments are an integral part of financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). We believe that the critical accounting policies listed below address the more significant estimates required of management when preparing our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. We consider an accounting estimate critical if changes in the estimate may have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We believe that the accounting estimates employed are appropriate and resulting balances are reasonable; however, actual results could differ from the original estimates, requiring adjustment to these balances in future periods. The accounting policies that reflect our more significant estimates, judgments and assumptions and which we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results are:
| Revenue recognition |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts |
| Net realizable value of inventory |
| Valuation of goodwill |
| Business combinations |
| Income taxes |
| Share-based compensation |
During the fiscal first half of 2012, there were no significant changes in our estimates and critical accounting policies. Please refer to Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, for a more complete discussion of our estimates and critical accounting policies.
The Company performed its annual impairment test of goodwill during the fiscal third quarter of 2011, and our analysis indicated that we had no impairment of goodwill. As described in Note 3. Intangible Assets in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, we will continue to monitor conditions and changes that could indicate that our recorded goodwill may be impaired.
Trademarks
Aquaform® , Avaira®, Biofinity® and Proclear® are registered trademarks of The Cooper Companies, Inc., its affiliates and/or subsidiaries. Comfort Science and PC Technology are trademarks of The Cooper Companies, Inc., its affiliates and/or subsidiaries.
31
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Most of our operations outside the United States have their local currency as their functional currency. We are exposed to risks caused by changes in foreign exchange, principally our British pound sterling, euro, Japanese yen, Swedish krona and Canadian dollar-denominated debt and receivables, and from operations in foreign currencies. We have taken steps to minimize our balance sheet exposure. Although we may enter into foreign exchange agreements with financial institutions to reduce our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency values relative to our debt or receivables obligations, these hedging transactions do not eliminate that risk entirely. We are also exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates, as the interest rate on our Credit Agreement may vary with the Eurodollar rate. We have decreased this interest rate risk by hedging a significant portion of variable rate debt effectively converting it to fixed rate debt for varying periods through December 2014. For additional detail, see Item 1A. Risk Factors and Note 1 and Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, and Note 9 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2012.
On May 31, 2012, we entered into an amendment to our senior unsecured Credit Agreement. The aggregate commitment of the Senior Unsecured Revolving Line of Credit was increased to $1.0 billion from $750.0 million, and the $234.4 million outstanding balance on the term loan was fully repaid using the new revolving facility. This facility offers additional availability, lower interest rates and extends the maturity date to May 31, 2017 from January 12, 2016. In addition, we have the ability to increase the revolving credit facility by up to an additional $500.0 million. KeyBank led the refinancing with certain banks that participated in the Credit Agreement retaining or increasing their participation in the Revolver.
On January 12, 2011, we refinanced our syndicated Senior Unsecured Revolving Line of Credit due to mature on January 31, 2012, with a new Credit Agreement that provides for a multicurrency revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $750.0 million and an amortizing term loan facility in an original principal amount of $250.0 million, each of which, mature on January 12, 2016. On February 15, 2011, we redeemed all $339.0 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our Senior Notes, in accordance with the terms of the Indenture, from borrowings under the new Credit Agreement, including $250.0 million from the term loan facility.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company has established and currently maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in its reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission and that any material information relating to the Company is recorded, processed, summarized and reported to its principal officers to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving desired control objectives. In reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
32
In conjunction with the close of each fiscal quarter, the Company conducts a review and evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. The Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, based upon their evaluation as of April 30, 2012, the end of the fiscal quarter covered in this report, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
As of April 30, 2012, there has been no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
33
Tax Matter
On April 1, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a Notice of Deficiency to the Company in connection with its audit of the Companys income tax returns for the years 2005 and 2006. The Notice asserted that the Company is subject to additional taxes due for its tax year 2005 under the anti-deferral provisions of Subpart F of the Internal Revenue Code. A settlement concerning the 2005 claimed deficiency was subsequently reached with District Counsel for the IRS which effectively settled all related matters. The decision document was filed with the U.S. Tax Court on January 19, 2012, with an agreed net deficiency of about $50 thousand.
Securities Litigation
On November 28, 2011, Harold Greenberg filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 4:11-cv-05697-YGR, against the following defendants: the Company; Robert S. Weiss, its President, Chief Executive Officer and a director; Eugene J. Midlock, its former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and Albert G. White, III, its Vice President of Investor Relations, Treasurer and Chief Strategic Officer. On December 12, 2011, a second individual, Ross Wallen, filed a related complaint against the same defendants in the Northern District of California, Case No. 4:11-cv-06214-YGR. The Wallen complaint largely repeats the allegations in the Greenberg complaint. Greenberg and Wallen each sought to represent a class of persons who purchased the Companys common stock between March 4, 2011 and November 15, 2011.
On February 29, 2012, the court ordered the Greenberg and Wallen actions consolidated and appointed Universal-Investment-Gesellschaft mbH Lead Plaintiff. On May 4, 2012, the lead plaintiff filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint, which alleges that the Company, Robert S. Weiss and Eugene J. Midlock violated Sections 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act by, among other things, making misrepresentations with an intent to deceive investors concerning the safety of the Avaira Toric and Avaira Sphere contact lenses, which the Company recalled in 2011. The Consolidated Amended Complaint seeks unspecified damages on behalf of the purported class.
On June 1, 2012, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, which is scheduled for hearing on August 7, 2012. Discovery is stayed pending a resolution of motions to dismiss. The Company is not in a position to assess whether any loss or adverse effect on the Companys financial condition is probable or remote or to estimate the range of potential loss, if any.
Derivative Litigation
On January 9, 2012, Joseph Operman filed a purported shareholder derivative complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 4:12-cv-00143-YGR, against members of the Companys board of directors. The derivative complaint seeks recovery on behalf of the Company, which is named as a nominal defendant. The derivative complaint purports to allege causes of action for breach of fiduciary duties and failure to exercise oversight responsibilities against all defendants and a cause of action for contribution against Mr. Weiss for alleged violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On May 18, 2012, Operman filed an Amended Derivative Complaint. The amended derivative complaint largely repeats the allegations of misrepresentations in the securities class action complaints described above, and includes allegations of false projections of future financial results. The Company and the individual defendants have not yet
34
filed a response to the derivative complaint. The parties have agreed, pending approval by the Court, to extend the deadline for responding to the derivative complaint until after the court rules on the defendants motion to dismiss in the class action.
There have been no material changes in the Companys risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended October 31, 2011.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period |
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid Per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
||||||||||||
11/1/11 11/30/11 |
| $ | | | $ | | ||||||||||
12/1/11 12/31/11 |
332,817 | $ | 69.48 | 332,817 | $ | 126,876,000 | ||||||||||
1/1/12 1/31/12 |
330,170 | $ | 69.72 | 330,170 | $ | 103,857,000 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
662,987 | $ | 69.60 | 662,987 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
The transactions described in the table above represent the repurchase of the Companys common stock on the New York Stock Exchange as part of the $150.0 million share repurchase program approved by the Companys Board of Directors in December 2011 (2012 Share Repurchase Program). Purchases under the 2012 Share Repurchase Program may be made from time-to-time on the open market at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions and are subject to a review of the circumstances in place at the time and will be made from time to time as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements. This program runs through December 31, 2012, and may be discontinued at any time. No shares were repurchased in the three-month period ended April 30, 2012. At April 30, 2012, approximately $103.9 million remained authorized for repurchase under the 2012 Share Repurchase Program.
35
Exhibit Number |
Description | |
11* | Calculation of Earnings Per Share | |
22.1 | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders filed as Item 5.07 in the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference | |
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | |
32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
* | The information called for in this Exhibit is provided in Note 6. Earnings Per Share to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements in this report. |
36
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
The Cooper Companies, Inc. | ||||||
(Registrant) | ||||||
Date: June 8, 2012 | /s/ Rodney E. Folden | |||||
Rodney E. Folden | ||||||
Vice President and Corporate Controller | ||||||
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
37
THE COOPER COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Exhibit No. |
Page No. | |||
11* | Calculation of Earnings Per Share | |||
22.1 | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders filed as Item 5.07 in the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference | |||
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |||
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |||
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | |||
32.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | |||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document | |||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema | |||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase | |||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase | |||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase | |||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
* | The information called for in this Exhibit is provided in Note 6. Earnings Per Share to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements in this report. |
38