o | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
o | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
o | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
þ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
o | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
þ | No fee required. | |
o | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | ||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | ||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | ||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | ||
(5) | Total fee paid: | ||
o | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |
o | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: | ||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | ||
(3) | Filing Party: | ||
(4) | Date Filed: | ||
| In order to determine the additional number of shares to be added to the 2004 Stock Plan, Leaps Compensation Committee retained Mercer (US), Inc. (Mercer), a national consulting firm specializing in executive compensation matters. Mercer reviewed and compared available share reserves under equity plans used by a select peer group of companies in the wireless telecommunications industry with revenues, business operations, numbers of employees and growth trajectories similar to ours. This peer group of companies included American Tower, CenturyTel, Crown Castle International, Frontier Communications, MetroPCS Communications, NII Holdings, Telephone and Data Systems, Time Warner Telecommunications, US Cellular and Windstream. We and Mercer believe this group of companies provides a better and more representative comparison against which to evaluate the size of the Proposed Increase rather than the companies against which shareholder advisory groups have compared us. Following its review of the comparative data, Leaps Compensation Committee recommended the Proposed Increase. |
| Leaps Compensation Committee generally reviews the compensation opportunities that we provide to our employees, including long-term equity incentive awards, with reference to and in the context of the 75th percentile of compensation opportunities provided by other comparable companies. | ||
| We believe that the share overhang that would result from the Proposed Increase is competitive and appropriate when compared to the peer group we surveyed. A share overhang methodology analyzes the number of shares that are outstanding and may be issued in the future under a stock plan as a percentage of total shares outstanding. After taking into account the additional shares from the Proposed Increase, Leaps share overhang would be approximately 11%, an amount that is estimated to be between the 50th and 75th percentiles of the other surveyed peer companies. This analysis is described in further detail in materials prepared by Mercer on Addendum A. | ||
| We believe that the economic overhang that would result from the Proposed Increase is also competitive and appropriate when compared to the peer group we surveyed. An economic overhang methodology analyzes the potential value of awards that may be issued under a stock plan as a percentage of a companys market capitalization. After taking into account the additional shares from the Proposed Increase, Leaps economic overhang would be approximately 8.6%, an amount that is estimated to be just below the 75th percentile of the other surveyed peer companies. This analysis is described in further detail in materials prepared by Mercer on Addendum B. |
| Leaps revenue growth over the past three years has been at appropriately the 75th percentile of the surveyed peer companies. In addition, Leaps annual growth in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) over this period has been generally at the median of the surveyed peer companies, even at a time when we were making significant continued investments in our business. We believe that equity compensation opportunities provide our employees with a direct incentive to deliver financial and operational performance, which in turn creates value for Leaps stockholders. |
| Leaps long-term business strategy has been focused on growing the company and its operations. Between 2005 and 2008, Leap experienced significant growth in its financial results and operating performance, including: |
| a 105% increase in revenues; |
| a 143% increase in the size of its wireless footprint; | ||
| a 130% increase in total customers; and | ||
| a 50% increase in adjusted operating income before depreciation and amortization (OIBDA), even during a time in which we invested approximately $172 million of net operating expenses into our growth initiatives. |
| Since the end of 2005, our number of employees increased from approximately 1,500 to approximately 4,120 as of May 1, 2009 (a 175% increase). | ||
| With the increase in the number of employees since the end of 2005, the number of plan participants increased from approximately 110 to approximately 270 as of May 1, 2009 (a 145% increase). |
| Leap has continued to experience significant growth in 2009, as evidenced by our recent first quarter 2009 financial and operational results: |
| Leap achieved a record number of approximately 493,000 net customer additions. | ||
| Quarterly service revenues increased approximately 29 percent over service revenues for the first quarter of 2008. | ||
| We recently launched our two largest wireless markets to date in Chicago and Philadelphia and plan to launch Cricket service in Washington D.C. and Baltimore by the middle of 2009. | ||
| Our Cricket Broadband service continues to achieve attractive customer growth. |
| Based upon our experience, Leaps growth and expansion will require that we continue to hire and recruit talent and grant additional stock awards to new and current employees as long-term incentives. |
| As of May 1, 2009, there were 278,982 shares available for grant under the 2004 Stock Plan. Based upon the current trading price of Leap common stock, Leap will not be able to make additional awards to eligible employees in 2009 in amounts that we consider to be appropriate to provide meaningful incentives. |
| We believe that Leaps ability to continue to execute on its long-term business strategy will require that we continue to provide meaningful equity incentive awards that align employee and stockholder interests. |
Sincerely, |
||||
/s/ S. Douglas Hutcheson | ||||
S. Douglas Hutcheson President and Chief Executive Officer |
||||