e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 |
-or-
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from
to |
Commission file number 014140
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, I N C.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
|
|
22-2655804 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
12 East 49th Street, New York, New York
|
|
10017 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code
(212) 273-7100
Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc.
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o | Accelerated Filer o | Non-accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller Reporting Company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
117,873,453 shares of Common Stock were outstanding as of the close of business on August 3, 2009
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Part I Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands of dollars except for per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amounts and shares outstanding) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal transactions |
|
$ |
65,264 |
|
|
$ |
20,867 |
|
|
$ |
117,305 |
|
|
$ |
34,805 |
|
Commissions |
|
|
4,693 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
9,595 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
Investment banking |
|
|
8,199 |
|
|
|
3,529 |
|
|
|
12,459 |
|
|
|
3,824 |
|
Investment banking revenue from
related party |
|
|
4,837 |
|
|
|
5,755 |
|
|
|
5,767 |
|
|
|
6,130 |
|
Investment gains |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
Interest |
|
|
11,504 |
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
22,152 |
|
|
|
7,851 |
|
Fees and other |
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
97,167 |
|
|
|
35,089 |
|
|
|
171,429 |
|
|
|
55,251 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,422 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
8,124 |
|
|
|
3,828 |
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
92,745 |
|
|
|
34,080 |
|
|
|
163,305 |
|
|
|
51,423 |
|
|
Expenses (excluding interest): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
63,537 |
|
|
|
26,126 |
|
|
|
115,944 |
|
|
|
43,279 |
|
Clearing, settlement and brokerage |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
Communications and data processing |
|
|
2,653 |
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
3,899 |
|
Occupancy and depreciation |
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
3,106 |
|
Selling |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
2,794 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,063 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,922 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
5,568 |
|
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
Total expenses (excluding interest) |
|
|
73,730 |
|
|
|
34,333 |
|
|
|
134,954 |
|
|
|
60,151 |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
19,015 |
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
28,351 |
|
|
|
(8,728 |
) |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
7,237 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
16,135 |
|
|
|
(1,016 |
) |
|
|
21,114 |
|
|
|
(10,264 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, (net of taxes) (see
Discontinued Operations note) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
16,121 |
|
|
$ |
(1,095 |
) |
|
$ |
21,142 |
|
|
$ |
(10,338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
Diluted earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
Weighted average common and common
equivalent shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
83,325,632 |
|
|
|
70,888,424 |
|
|
|
79,157,920 |
|
|
|
65,972,687 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
90,221,391 |
|
|
|
70,888,424 |
|
|
|
85,105,004 |
|
|
|
65,972,687 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars, except for per share amounts and |
|
|
|
|
shares outstanding) |
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
As of |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
20,191 |
|
|
$ |
7,377 |
|
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory purposes |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
Receivables from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokers, dealers and clearing agencies |
|
|
13,971 |
|
|
|
3,465 |
|
Customers, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $48 and $48 at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
Related party |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
Others |
|
|
7,886 |
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
Securities owned, at fair value (includes assets
pledged of $652,740 and $602,454 at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively) |
|
|
670,284 |
|
|
|
618,822 |
|
Investments |
|
|
16,687 |
|
|
|
15,398 |
|
Office equipment and leasehold improvements, net |
|
|
1,916 |
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
104,996 |
|
|
|
23,283 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
22,404 |
|
|
|
8,239 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
11,404 |
|
|
|
10,804 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
870,971 |
|
|
$ |
694,271 |
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokers, dealers and clearing agencies |
|
$ |
551,941 |
|
|
$ |
511,827 |
|
Related party |
|
|
15,532 |
|
|
|
1,365 |
|
Others |
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value |
|
|
16,893 |
|
|
|
15,228 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,216 |
|
|
|
2,172 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
50,011 |
|
|
|
31,939 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
6,017 |
|
|
|
6,178 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
9,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatory redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
24,303 |
|
|
|
24,187 |
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
677,603 |
|
|
|
594,319 |
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Debt |
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock; $1.00 par value; authorized
1,500,000 shares; issued 1,000,000 (Mandatory
Redeemable) shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock; $.01 par value; authorized 200,000,000
and 100,000,000 shares, respectively; issued
103,957,958 and 81,556,246 shares, respectively; and
outstanding 103,275,164 and 79,829,492 shares, respectively |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
308,162 |
|
|
|
236,824 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(116,920 |
) |
|
|
(138,062 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost (682,794 shares and 1,726,754
shares, respectively) |
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
(2,241 |
) |
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
192,171 |
|
|
|
98,290 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
870,971 |
|
|
$ |
694,271 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
21,142 |
|
|
$ |
(10,338 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Amortization of discount of mandatory redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of stock compensation |
|
|
4,782 |
|
|
|
3,164 |
|
Reduction of deferred tax valuation allowance |
|
|
(5,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized investment (gains), net |
|
|
(1,066 |
) |
|
|
(298 |
) |
Realized losses (gains) on investments |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
Disposal of office equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory purposes |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
Net receivables from customers |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
3,168 |
|
Net payables to related party |
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
(800 |
) |
Securities owned, at fair value |
|
|
(51,462 |
) |
|
|
(106,665 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
(5,206 |
) |
Net payable to brokers, dealers and clearing agencies |
|
|
29,608 |
|
|
|
117,278 |
|
Net receivable from others |
|
|
(4,663 |
) |
|
|
(956 |
) |
Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value |
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
|
(46,747 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
15,925 |
|
|
|
2,330 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in drafts payable |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
57 |
|
Income taxes payable, net |
|
|
9,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash providing by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
21,077 |
|
|
|
(43,675 |
) |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of office equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
(700 |
) |
Payment for purchase of Debt Capital Markets Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(809 |
) |
Payment for purchase of Gleacher Partners Inc., net of cash acquired |
|
|
(6,560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment to sellers of American Technology Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions investments |
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(7,798 |
) |
|
|
(1,373 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of mandatory redeemable preferred stock and warrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Payment of expenses for issuance of mandatory redeemable preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(671 |
) |
Repayment of subordinated debt |
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
(1,300 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,670 |
|
Payment of expenses for issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
42,514 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash |
|
|
12,814 |
|
|
|
(2,534 |
) |
Cash at beginning of the period |
|
|
7,377 |
|
|
|
31,747 |
|
|
Cash at the end of the period |
|
$ |
20,191 |
|
|
$ |
29,213 |
|
|
Non Cash Investing and Financing Activities
During the six-months ended June 30, 2009, Goodwill increased by $80.0 million and Intangible
assets increased by $14.9 million for the acquisition of Gleacher Partners Inc. Goodwill also
increased by $1.7 million associated with earn-out payments related to the acquisition of American
Technology Research Holdings, Inc.
During the six-months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company distributed $0.4 million and $0.6
million, respectively, of the Companys stock from the employee stock trust to satisfy deferred
compensation liabilities payable to employees (see Stockholders Equity note).
Refer to Stock-Based Compensation Plans note for non-cash financing activities related to
restricted stock.
Refer to Investments note for non-cash investing activities related to the Employee Investment
Fund.
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements contain all normal, recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of results for
such periods. The results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of those for the
full year. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America have been omitted. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Broadpoint Gleacher Securities Group, Inc., formerly Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc. (and
including its subsidiaries, the Company), is an independent investment bank that provides
corporations and institutional investors with strategic, research-based investment opportunities,
capital raising, and financial advisory services, including merger and acquisition, restructuring,
recapitalization and strategic alternative analysis services. The Company offers a diverse range of
products through the Debt Capital Markets, Investment Banking and Broadpoint DESCAP divisions of
Broadpoint Capital, Inc., its new Investment Banking financial advisory subsidiary, Gleacher
Partners LLC, its Equity Capital Markets subsidiary, Broadpoint AmTech and its venture capital
subsidiary, FA Technology Ventures Inc. The Company is a New York corporation, incorporated in
1985, and is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market (NASDAQ) under the symbol BPSG.
Reclassification
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform to the
current period presentation. Certain 2008 amounts on the condensed consolidated statements of cash
flows have been reclassified to conform to account for purchase and sale agreements entered into on
to-be-announced (TBA) mortgage-backed securities. These TBAs were previously accounted for as
Securities owned and Securities sold, but not yet purchased, and are now recorded as derivative
transactions. These revisions decreased Securities owned by $1.0 million, decreased Securities
sold, but not yet purchased by $77.9 million, and increased net payable to brokers, dealers, and
clearing agencies by $76.9 million. There was no impact to the condensed consolidated statement of
financial condition. In addition, amounts Payable to related parties
of $1.4 million, as of December 31, 2008, have been
reclassified from Payables to others to its own separate line item on the condensed consolidated
statement of financial condition. The Company also reclassified $0.1 million from Investment gains
to Principal transactions for the three months ended June 30, 2008 on the condensed consolidated
statement of operations. There was no impact to total revenues related to this reclassification.
The Company does not believe these revisions are material to any of the previously issued financial
statements, based on the Companys assessment performed in accordance with the SECs Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 99.
Recent Accounting Developments
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)).
Under SFAS 141(R), an entity is required to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed,
contractual contingencies and contingent consideration measured at their fair value at the
acquisition date for any business combination consummated after the effective date. It further
requires that acquisition-related costs are to be recognized separately from the acquisition and
expensed as incurred. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. Accordingly, the Company applied the provisions of FASB 141(R)
to business combinations occurring after January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 141(R) resulted in
approximately $0.44 million of certain acquisition related costs that were not otherwise
capitalized in 2009, but were recognized separately and expensed as incurred.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 requires an entity to clearly
identify and present ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the entity in
the consolidated financial statements within the equity section but separate from the entitys
equity. It also requires: (i) the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and
to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated
statement of earnings; (ii) changes in ownership interest be accounted for similarly, as equity
transactions; and (iii) when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any
retained noncontrolling equity
investment in the former subsidiary and the gain or loss on the deconsolidation of the subsidiary
be measured at fair value. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008 and shall be applied prospectively, except for the
presentation and disclosure requirements,
which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods. The adoption of SFAS 160 did not have a
material effect on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and requires qualitative
disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about
fair values and amounts of gains and losses on derivative contracts and disclosures about
credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. SFAS 161 is effective for the
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 161 did
not have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
In April of 2008, the FASB issued FSP 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 is intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of
a recognized intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value
of the asset. The effective date for FSP 142-3 is for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. The adoption of FSP 142-3 did not impact the Companys condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In June 2008, FASB issued EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (EITF 03-6-1). EITF 03-6-1 applies to the
calculation of earnings per share under SFAS No. 128 Earnings Per Share for share-based payment
awards with rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. Unvested share-based payment awards that
contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are
participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to
the two-class method. The effective date for EITF 03-6-1 is for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. EITF 03-6-1 was not applicable to the Company for the period ended June 30,
2009.
On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued FAP No 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset
When the Market for that Asset is Not Active (FSP 157-3). FSP 157-3 clarifies how SFAS 157, Fair
Value Measurements, should be applied when valuing securities in markets that are not active. The
adoption of FSP 157-3, effective September 30, 2008, did not have a material impact on the
Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, Disclosures by Public Entities
(Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities
(FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8). FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 require public entities to provide
additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets and require public enterprises to
provide additional disclosures about their involvement with variable interest entities. FSP FAS
140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 were adopted for the Companys year end consolidated financial statements as
of December 31, 2008 and did not affect the Companys condensed statement of financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows as they require only additional disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2). Under the FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS
124-2, only the portion of an other-than-temporary impairment on a debt security related to credit
loss is recognized in current period earnings, with the remainder recognized in other comprehensive
income, if the holder does not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that the
holder will not be required to sell the security prior to recovery. Currently, the entire
other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in current period earnings. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS
124-2 are effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP No. FAS 115-2 and
FAS 124-2 did not have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 require
that the fair value disclosures prescribed by SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments be included in financial statements prepared for interim periods. FSP FAS
107-1 and APB 28-1 are effective for periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The Company adopted the
interim disclosure about fair value of financial instruments during the second quarter 2009 and it
did not have a material effect on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level
of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions
That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4). FSP FAS 157-4 provides guidance for estimating fair value
when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have decreased significantly.
Specifically, FSP No FAS 157-4 lists factors which should be evaluated to determine whether a
transaction is orderly, clarifies that adjustments to transactions or quoted prices may be
necessary when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have decreased
significantly, and provides guidance for determining the concurrent weighting of the transaction
price relative to fair value indications from other valuation techniques when estimating fair
value. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 during the second quarter did not have a material impact on
the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS 165). SFAS 165 establishes
general standards of accounting and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date
but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The standard, which
includes a new required disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent
events, is effective for interim or annual periods ending June 15, 2009.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
amendment of FASB No. 140 (SFAS 166). SFAS 166 improves financial reporting by eliminating the
exceptions for qualifying special-purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and the
exception that permitted sale accounting for certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has
not surrendered control over the transferred financial assets. SFAS 166 modifies the
financial-components approach used in SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, and limits the circumstances in which a financial asset,
or portion of a financial asset, should be derecognized when the transferor has not transferred the
entire original financial asset to an entity that is not consolidated with the transferor in the
financial statements being presented and/or when the transferor has continuing involvement with the
transferred financial asset. SFAS 166 also requires that a transferor recognize and initially
measure at fair value all assets obtained and liabilities incurred as a result of a transfer of
financial assets accounted for as a sale. SFAS 166 is effective as of the beginning of each
reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim
periods within the first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods
thereafter. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 166 on the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, The FASB issued SFAS 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities (SFAS 167). SFAS 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) to
require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise variable interest
or interest give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This analysis
identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the enterprise that has the
power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could
potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from
the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. Additionally,
SFAS 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) to require ongoing reassessments of whether an
enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 also amends
certain guidance in FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) for determining whether an entity is a variable
interest entity and to add an additional reconsideration event for determining whether an entity is
a variable interest entity when any changes in facts and circumstances occur such that the holders
of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights
of those investments to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance. SFAS 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) to require enhanced
disclosures and more transparent information about an enterprise s involvement in a variable
interest entity. SFAS 167 is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual
reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within the first annual
reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The Company is
currently assessing the impact of SFAS 167 on the Companys condensed consolidated financial
statements.
8
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(Codification) and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of
SFAS No 162. The Codification will become the source of authoritative United States generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernment
entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under
authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.
The Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting
and reporting standards. All other nongrandfathered non-SEC accounting literature included in the
Codification will become nonauthoritative. This Statement is effective for financial statements
issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company is currently
assessing the impact of SFAS 168 on the Companys condensed consolidated statement of financial
condition and results of operations.
Resale and Repurchase Agreements
Transactions involving purchases of securities under agreements to resell or sales of securities
under agreements to repurchase are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and are
recorded at their contracted resale or repurchase amounts plus accrued interest. It is the policy
of the Company to obtain possession of collateral with a market value equal to or in excess of the
principal amount loaned under resale agreements. Collateral is valued daily and the Company may
require counterparties to deposit additional collateral or return collateral pledged when
appropriate. The Company had no outstanding resale or repurchase agreements as of June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008.
2. Earnings Per Common Share
The Company calculates its basic and diluted earnings per share in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share are
computed based upon weighted-average shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive earnings per
share is computed consistently with the basic computation while giving effect to all dilutive
potential common shares and common share equivalents that were outstanding during the period. The
Company uses the treasury stock method to reflect the potential dilutive effect of unvested stock
awards, warrants, and unexercised options. The weighted-average shares outstanding as calculated
are as follows:
The weighted-average shares outstanding as calculated are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Weighted average
shares for basic
earnings per share |
|
|
83,325,632 |
|
|
|
70,888,424 |
|
|
|
79,157,920 |
|
|
|
65,972,687 |
|
Effect of dilutive
common equivalent
shares |
|
|
6,895,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,947,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares and dilutive
common stock
equivalents for
diluted earnings
per share |
|
|
90,221,391 |
|
|
|
70,888,424 |
|
|
|
85,105,004 |
|
|
|
65,972,687 |
|
|
For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company excluded approximately 3.2
million and 3.1 million restricted stock units, respectively, in its computation of diluted
earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive. Also, for the three and six months ended June
30, 2008, the Company excluded approximately 2.7 million and 2.3 million of options, respectively,
in its computation of dilutive earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive. In addition, at
June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, approximately 6.6 million and 6.2 million shares of restricted
stock awards (see Stock-Based Compensation Plans note), respectively, which awards are included
in shares outstanding and excluded from weighted average shares, are not included in the basic
earnings per share computation because they were not vested as of June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008,
respectively.
9
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
3. Receivables from and Payables to Brokers, Dealers and Clearing Agencies
Amounts receivable from and payable to brokers, dealers and clearing agencies consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Receivable from clearing organizations |
|
$ |
9,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,809 |
|
Syndicate and commissions receivable |
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
Good faith deposits |
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
Total Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing agencies |
|
$ |
13,971 |
|
|
$ |
3,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable to clearing organizations |
|
|
551,941 |
|
|
|
511,827 |
|
|
Total Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing agencies |
|
$ |
551,941 |
|
|
$ |
511,827 |
|
|
Securities transactions are recorded on trade date basis. The related amounts
receivable and payable for unsettled securities transactions are recorded on a net basis in
receivables from or payables to brokers, dealers and clearing agencies on the unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of financial condition.
The customers of the Companys subsidiaries agency and principal securities transactions are
cleared through third party clearing agreements on a fully disclosed basis. Under these
agreements, the clearing agents settle these transactions on a fully disclosed basis, collect
margin receivables related to these transactions, monitor the credit standing and required margin
levels related to these customers and, pursuant to margin guidelines, require the customer to
deposit additional collateral with them or to reduce positions, if necessary.
4. Receivables from and Payables to Customers
At June 30, 2009, receivables from customers represent principal due from institutional clients
relating to factor changes on mortgage backed securities and aged fails to deliver related to the
Companys legacy self clearing business executed with institutional clients which has been fully
reserved. Receivables from customers at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $0.4 million and
$0.0 million, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.05 million and $0.05 million,
respectively. There were no payables to customers at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
The Companys broker-dealer subsidiaries are parties to clearing agreements with clearing agents in
connection with their securities trading activities. If the clearing agent incurs a loss, it has
the right to pass the loss through to such subsidiaries which, as a result, exposes the Company to
off-balance-sheet risk. The subsidiaries have retained the right to pursue collection or
performance from customers who do not perform under their contractual obligations and monitors
customer balances on a daily basis along with the credit standing of the clearing agent. As the
potential amount of losses during the term of this contract has no maximum, the Company believes
there is no maximum amount assignable to this indemnification.
Prior to the end of the second quarter of 2008, Broadpoint Capital, Inc. (Broadpoint Capital),
one of the Companys broker-dealer subsidiaries, was self-clearing for certain transactions
executed with institutional customers. Broadpoint Capitals non-institutional customer securities
transactions, including those of officers, directors, employees and related individuals, were
cleared through a third party under a clearing agreement. Under this agreement, the clearing agent
executed and settled customer securities transactions, collected margin receivables related to
these transactions, monitored the credit standing and required margin levels related to these
customers and, pursuant to margin guidelines, required the customer to deposit additional
collateral with them or to reduce positions, if necessary. In the event the customer was unable to
fulfill its contractual obligations, the clearing agent had the option of either purchasing or
selling the financial instrument underlying the contract, and as a result might have incurred a
loss for which the clearing agent could have sought indemnification from Broadpoint Capital in the
manner described in the prior paragraph.
10
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
5. Financial Instruments
Substantially all of the Companys financial assets and liabilities are carried at fair value or
contractual amounts, which approximate fair value. Financial instruments recorded at contractual
amounts approximating fair value consist largely of receivables from and payables to brokers,
dealers and clearing organizations, customers, related party and others. Securities owned and
securities sold, but not yet purchased are recorded at fair value. Investments are recorded at
fair value. Mandatory redeemable preferred stock was recorded at an amount approximating fair
value and the financial instrument was valued in conjunction with the underlying warrant at the
date of issuance recorded at a discount, which is being amortized over the duration of the debt
(see Mandatory Redeemable Preferred Stock note).
Management believes the carrying amount approximates fair value, as
the yield on a similar instrument issued as of the balance sheet date
would approximate the same as the yield on the original date of
issuance. The carrying amount of liabilities subordinated
to claims of general creditors associated with the Companys deferred compensation plan for key
employees has a fair market of approximately $866,000.
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157)
effective January 1, 2008. Under this standard, fair value is defined as the price that would be
received upon the sale of an asset or paid upon the transfer of a liability (i.e., the exit
price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use
of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most
observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent
of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Companys assumptions about the
assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best
information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on
the reliability of inputs as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets that the Company has the ability to access at the
reporting date, for identical assets or liabilities. Prices are not adjusted for the
effects, if any, of the Company holding a large block relative to the overall trading
volume (referred to as a blockage factor)
Level 2: Directly or indirectly observable prices in active markets for similar assets or
liabilities; quoted prices for identical or similar items in markets that are not active;
inputs other than quoted prices (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, credit risks,
volatilities); or market corroborated inputs.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect managements own assumptions about the
assumptions market participants would make.
The availability of observable inputs can vary from product to product and is affected by a wide
variety of factors, including, for example, the type of product, whether the product is new and not
yet established in the marketplace, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. To the
extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the
market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment
exercised by management in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level
3. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the
fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes the level in the fair value hierarchy
within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest
level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
FSP FAS 157-3 is consistent with the joint press release the FASB issued with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 30, 2008, which provides general clarification guidance on
determining fair value under FASB 157 when markets are inactive. FSP FAS 157-3 specifically
addresses the use of judgment in determining whether a transaction in a dislocated market
represents fair value, the inclusion of market participant risk adjustments when an entity
significantly adjusts observable market data based on unobservable inputs, and the degree of
reliance to be placed on broker quotes or pricing services. FSP FAS
157-3 is effective October 10, 2008. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-3 did not have a material effect on the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements.
11
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS 157
when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly declined. FSP
FAS 157-4 also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not
orderly. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15,
2009, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted FSP FAS 157-4 in the second quarter of
2009. The application of FSP FAS 157-4 did not have an impact on the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Fair Valuation Methodology
Cash Instruments These financial assets represent cash in banks or cash invested in liquid money
market funds. These investments are valued at par, which represent fair value, and are reported as
Level 1.
Securities Owned/Securities Sold But Not Yet Purchased These financial assets represent
investments in fixed income and equity securities.
Fixed income securities which are traded in active markets include on the run treasuries,
investment grade debt, asset and mortgage backed securities including TBAs, and corporate debt.
The on the run treasuries and TBAs
are generally traded in active, quoted and highly liquid markets. These assets are generally
classified as Level 1. TBAs which are not issued within the next earliest date for issuance are
treated as derivatives and are generally classified as Level 1. As there is no quoted market for
investment grade debt, asset and mortgage backed securities, and corporate debt, the Company
utilizes observable market factors in determining fair value. These financial instruments are
reported as Level 2. In certain circumstances, the Company may utilize unobservable inputs that
reflect managements own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would make. These
financial assets are reported as Level 3.
In determining fair value for Level 2 financial instruments, management utilizes benchmark yields,
reported trades for comparable trade sizes, issuer spreads, two sided markets, benchmark
securities, bids and offers. These inputs relate either directly to the financial asset being
evaluated or indirectly to a similar security (for example, another bond of the same issuer or a
bond of a different issuer in the same industry with similar maturity, terms and conditions).
Additionally for certain mortgage backed securities, management also considers various
characteristics such as issuer, underlying collateral, prepayment speeds, cash flows and credit
ratings.
In determining fair value for Level 3 financial instruments, management maximizes the use of market
observable inputs when available. Management utilizes factors such as bids that were received,
spreads to the yield curve on similar offered financial assets, or comparing spreads to similar
financial assets that traded and had been priced through an independent pricing source. Management
considers these pricing methodologies consistent with assumptions in how other market participants
value certain financial assets. These pricing methodologies involve management judgment and as a
result, lead to a Level 3 classification.
Management then evaluates the fair value against other factors and valuation models it deems
relevant. These factors may be a recent purchase or sale of the financial asset at a price that
differs from the fair value based upon observable inputs or economic events that impact the value
of the asset such as liquidity in the market, political events or observations of equity curves
related to the issuer. These same factors are utilized to value Level 3 financial assets where no
observable inputs are available.
Equity securities are valued at quoted market prices. These financial assets are reported as Level
1 when traded in active markets. When quoted prices are not available, valuation models are applied
to these financial assets. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation
and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or
market and the instruments complexity. Accordingly, these
financial assets are recorded as Level 3.
Derivatives In connection with mortgage-backed securities trading, the Company economically
hedges its exposure through the use of TBAs. These TBAs, which are not due to settle within the
next earliest date for settlement, are accounted for as derivatives. These derivatives are traded
in an active quoted market and therefore generally classified as Level 1. (See Derivative
Financial Instruments note for further information regarding the use by the Company of Derivative
instruments).
12
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Investments These financial assets represent investments in partnerships.
Valuation models are applied to the underlying investments of the partnership which are important
inputs into the valuation of the partnership interests. These valuation techniques involve some
level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price
transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments complexity. Accordingly, these
investments in partnerships are recorded as Level 3.
Transfers Assets will transfer in and out of Level 3 based upon widening and tightening of
spreads due to increased or decreased volumes and liquidity.
The following table summarizes the categorization of the financial instruments within the fair
value hierarchy at June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at Fair Value |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Cash Instruments (1) |
|
$ |
20,291 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,291 |
|
Securities Owned (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426 |
|
U.S. Government and federal agency
obligations |
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
|
614,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616,804 |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Corporate obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,647 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,390 |
|
|
|
9,138 |
|
|
|
12,528 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
13,593 |
|
|
|
15,964 |
|
Other debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
2,870 |
|
|
|
5,887 |
|
Derivatives (2) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,687 |
|
|
|
16,687 |
|
|
Total Financial Assets At Fair Value |
|
$ |
22,415 |
|
|
$ |
642,559 |
|
|
$ |
42,288 |
|
|
$ |
707,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities at Fair Value |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Securities Sold But Not Yet Purchased (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agency
obligations |
|
$ |
11,246 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,246 |
|
Corporate obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,774 |
|
Derivatives (2) |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
Total Financial Liabilities At Fair Value |
|
$ |
12,119 |
|
|
$ |
4,774 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cash instruments include Cash and cash equivalents of $20.2 million and Cash segregated for
regulatory purposes of $0.1 million in the condensed consolidated statements of financial
condition. |
|
(2) |
|
Unrealized gains/(losses) relating to Derivatives are reported in Securities owned and
Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value in the condensed consolidated statements
of financial condition. |
13
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the categorization of the financial instruments within the fair
value hierarchy at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at Fair Value |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Cash Instruments (1) |
|
$ |
7,847 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,847 |
|
Securities Owned (2) |
|
|
13,070 |
|
|
|
581,360 |
|
|
|
24,381 |
|
|
|
618,811 |
|
Derivatives (2) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,398 |
|
|
|
15,398 |
|
|
Total Financial Assets At Fair Value |
|
$ |
20,928 |
|
|
$ |
581,360 |
|
|
$ |
39,779 |
|
|
$ |
642,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities at Fair Value |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Securities Sold But Not Yet Purchased (2) |
|
$ |
14,476 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
14,477 |
|
Derivatives (2) |
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
Total Financial Liabilities At Fair Value |
|
$ |
15,227 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
15,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cash instruments include Cash and cash equivalents of $7.4 million and Cash segregated for
regulatory purposes of $0.5 million in the condensed consolidated statements of financial
condition. |
|
(2) |
|
Unrealized gains/(losses) relating to Derivatives are reported in Securities owned and
Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value in the condensed consolidated statements
of financial condition. |
The following tables summarize the changes in the Companys Level 3 financial instruments for the
three month period ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Debt |
|
mortgage-backed |
|
mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
Obligations |
|
securities |
|
securities |
|
Investments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,987 |
|
|
$ |
2,156 |
|
|
$ |
10,830 |
|
|
$ |
15,379 |
|
|
$ |
31,352 |
|
Realized gains/(losses) (1) |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(335 |
) |
Unrealized gains/(losses) (1) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
Purchases, sales and settlements |
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
9,882 |
|
|
|
(3,776 |
) |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
6,144 |
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 (2) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,023 |
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,870 |
|
|
$ |
13,593 |
|
|
$ |
9,138 |
|
|
$ |
16,687 |
|
|
$ |
42,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains/(losses) on Level 3
assets still held at the reporting
date (1) |
|
$ |
(83 |
) |
|
$ |
(409 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,036 |
) |
|
$ |
1,367 |
|
|
$ |
(161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) are reported in Principal transactions in the
condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company reviews the classification assigned to financial instruments on a
quarterly basis. As the observability and strength of valuation attributes changes,
reclassifications of certain financial assets or liabilities may occur among levels. The
reporting of these reclassifications results in a transfer in/out of Level 3 at fair value
in the quarter of the change. During the three month period ended June 30, 2009, there
was a net transfer in of approximately $4.0 million to Level 3 based upon assumptions
used on prepayment speeds and defaults. These transfers were primarily investment grade
performing mortgage and asset backed securities. |
14
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following tables summarize the changes in the Companys Level 3 financial instruments for the
three month period ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
owned |
|
Investments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
117,796 |
|
|
$ |
16,860 |
|
|
$ |
134,656 |
|
Realized gains/(losses) (1) |
|
|
(467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(467 |
) |
Unrealized gains/(losses) (1) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements |
|
|
(61,725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,725 |
) |
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 (2) |
|
|
(9,244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,244 |
) |
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
46,238 |
|
|
$ |
17,150 |
|
|
$ |
63,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains/(losses) on Level 3
assets still held at the reporting
date (1) |
|
$ |
(1,452 |
) |
|
$ |
4,245 |
|
|
$ |
2,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) are reported in Principal transactions in the
condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company reviews the classification assigned to financial instruments on a
quarterly basis. As the observability and strength of valuation attributes changes,
reclassifications of certain financial assets or liabilities may occur among levels. The
reporting of these reclassifications results in a transfer in/out of Level 3 at fair value
in the quarter of the change. During the three month period ended June 30, 2008, there
was a net transfer out of approximately $9.2 million from Level 3. These transfers were
primarily investment grade performing mortgage and asset backed securities. |
The following tables summarize the changes in the Companys Level 3 financial instruments for the
six month period ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Debt |
|
mortgage-backed |
|
mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
Obligations |
|
securities |
|
securities |
|
Investments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
2,348 |
|
|
$ |
1,165 |
|
|
$ |
20,868 |
|
|
$ |
15,398 |
|
|
$ |
39,779 |
|
Realized gains/(losses) (1) |
|
|
(280 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(1,088 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(1,417 |
) |
Unrealized gains/(losses) (1) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1,576 |
) |
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
(491 |
) |
Purchases, sales and settlements |
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
12,018 |
|
|
|
(7,640 |
) |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
5,436 |
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 (2) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
(1,426 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,019 |
) |
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
2,870 |
|
|
$ |
13,593 |
|
|
$ |
9,138 |
|
|
$ |
16,687 |
|
|
$ |
42,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains/(losses) on Level 3
assets still held at the reporting
date (1) |
|
$ |
(83 |
) |
|
$ |
(409 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,036 |
) |
|
$ |
1,367 |
|
|
$ |
(161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) are reported in Principal transactions
in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company reviews the classification assigned to financial instruments on a
quarterly basis. As the observability and strength of valuation attributes changes,
reclassifications of certain financial
assets or liabilities may occur among levels. The reporting of these reclassifications
results in a transfer in/out of Level 3 at fair value in the quarter of the change.
During the six month period ended June 30, 2009, there was a net transfer out of
approximately $1.0 million from Level 3. These transfers were primarily investment
grade performing mortgage and asset backed securities. |
15
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following tables summarize the changes in the Companys Level 3 financial instruments for the
six month period ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
owned |
|
Investments |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
64,822 |
|
|
$ |
16,913 |
|
|
$ |
81,735 |
|
Realized gains/(losses) (1) |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
Unrealized gains/(losses) (1) |
|
|
(1,022 |
) |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
(793 |
) |
Purchases, issuances and settlements |
|
|
(14,795 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(14,787 |
) |
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 (2) |
|
|
(2,205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,205 |
) |
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
46,238 |
|
|
$ |
17,150 |
|
|
$ |
63,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains/(losses) on Level 3
assets still held at the reporting
date (1) |
|
$ |
(1,452 |
) |
|
$ |
4,245 |
|
|
$ |
2,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) are reported in Principal transactions in the
condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company reviews the classification assigned to financial instruments on a
quarterly basis. As the observability and strength of valuation attributes changes,
reclassifications of certain financial assets or liabilities may occur among levels. The
reporting of these reclassifications results in a transfer in/out of Level 3 at fair value
in the quarter of the change. During the six month period ended June 30, 2008, there
was a net transfer out of approximately $2.2 million from Level 3. These transfers were
primarily investment grade performing mortgage and asset backed securities. |
6. Securities owned and sold, but not yet purchased
Securities owned and sold, but not yet purchased consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold, but |
|
|
|
|
|
Sold, but |
|
|
|
|
|
|
not yet |
|
|
|
|
|
not yet |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
Owned |
|
purchased |
|
Owned |
|
purchased |
|
Marketable Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations |
|
$ |
616,804 |
|
|
$ |
11,246 |
|
|
$ |
546,436 |
|
|
$ |
14,476 |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate obligations |
|
|
52,965 |
|
|
|
4,774 |
|
|
|
71,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate stocks |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
Not Readily Marketable Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities with no publicly quoted
market |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
670,284 |
|
|
$ |
16,893 |
|
|
$ |
618,822 |
|
|
$ |
15,228 |
|
|
Securities not readily marketable include investment securities (a) for which there is no market on
a securities exchange or no independent publicly quoted market, (b) that cannot be publicly offered
or sold unless registration has been effected under the Securities Act of 1933, or (c) that cannot
be offered or sold because of other arrangements, restrictions or conditions applicable to the
securities or to the Company.
16
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
7. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Intangible Assets (amortizable): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadpoint Securities, Inc. Acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
641 |
|
|
$ |
641 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
Broadpoint Debt Capital Markets Customer Relationship |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
American Technology Research Customer Relationship |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
6,960 |
|
|
|
6,960 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(454 |
) |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
6,506 |
|
|
|
6,809 |
|
|
American Technology Research Covenant not to Compete |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
American Technology Research Trademarks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
Gleacher Partners Trade Name |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
7,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
7,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gleacher Partners Backlog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gleacher Partners Non Compete Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gleacher Partners Customer Relationships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
6,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible Assets |
|
$ |
22,404 |
|
|
$ |
8,239 |
|
|
17
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Customer related intangible assets are being amortized from 3 to 12 years. Covenant not to compete
assets are being amortized over 3 years, trademark assets are being amortized from 1 to 20 years,
and backlog investment banking projects are being amortized over 0.6 years. Future amortization
expense is estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 (remaining) |
|
$ |
3,141 |
|
2010 |
|
|
3,698 |
|
2011 |
|
|
3,047 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,928 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,050 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,024 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
8,516 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
22,404 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Goodwill: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadpoint Securities, Inc. Acquisition |
|
$ |
17,364 |
|
|
$ |
17,364 |
|
American Technology Research Acquisition |
|
|
7,628 |
|
|
|
5,919 |
|
Gleacher Partners Acquisition |
|
|
80,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Goodwill |
|
$ |
104,996 |
|
|
$ |
23,283 |
|
|
8. Investments
The Companys investment portfolio includes interests in privately held companies. Information
regarding these investments has been aggregated and is presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private |
|
$ |
15,615 |
|
|
$ |
14,321 |
|
Employee Investment Funds,
net of Companys ownership interest |
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
Total carrying value |
|
$ |
16,687 |
|
|
$ |
15,398 |
|
|
Investment gains were comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Private (net realized and unrealized gains)
|
|
$ |
991 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
982 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
Investments in privately held companies include an investment of $15.6 million in FA Technology
Ventures L.P. (the Partnership). The Company is also committed to invest an additional $1.0
million to the Partnership. The Partnerships primary purpose is to provide investment returns
consistent with the risk of investing in venture capital. At June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008,
total Partnership capital for all investors in the Partnership equaled $60.2 million and $60.3
million, respectively. The Partnership is considered a variable interest entity. The Company is
not the primary beneficiary, due to other investors level of investment in the Partnership.
Accordingly, the Company has not consolidated the Partnership in these financial statements, but
has only recorded the fair value of its investments. FA Technology Ventures Corporation (FATV),
a wholly-owned subsidiary, is the investment advisor to the Partnership.
Revenues derived from the management of
this investment and the Employee Investment Funds (as defined below) for the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $0.4 million and $0.6 million in consolidation, respectively.
(See Commitments and Contingencies note for further information regarding FATV).
18
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The Company has recorded the employees portion of the fair value and related unrealized
gains/(losses) associated with its Employee Investment Funds (EIF) on its condensed consolidated
financial statements. The EIF are limited liability companies, established by the Company for the
purpose of having select employees invest in private equity securities. The EIF is managed by
Broadpoint Management Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary, which has contracted with FATV to act as an
investment advisor with respect to funds invested in parallel with the Partnership. The Companys
carrying value of the EIF at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is $0.1 million and $0.1 million,
respectively. The Company recorded $0.01 million unrealized loss and $0.01 million unrealized gain
on the EIF for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, in Investment
Gains on the condensed consolidated statement of operations. The offset $0.01 million unrealized
gain and $0.01 million unrealized loss in minority interest in EIF was recorded in Other income on
the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months and three months ended June
30, 2009, respectively. The Company has outstanding loans of $0.3 million from the EIF and is also
committed to loan an additional $0.2 million to the EIF. The effect of recording the EIF on the
Companys condensed consolidated statement of financial condition at June 30, 2009 was to increase
Investments by $1.1 million, decrease Receivable from others by $0.3 million and increase Payable
to others by $0.8 million. The amounts in Payable to others relates to the value of the EIF owned
by employees. (See Commitments and Contingencies note for further information regarding EIF).
9. Receivables from and Payables to Others
Amounts receivable from and payable to others consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Interest |
|
$ |
4,254 |
|
|
$ |
3,025 |
|
Investment advisory fees |
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
Sublease rental income |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Loans and advances from employees |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Management fees |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Others |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
Total
Receivables to others |
|
$ |
7,886 |
|
|
$ |
4,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Payable to Employees for the Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Funds (see Investments note) |
|
$ |
792 |
|
|
$ |
797 |
|
Drafts payable |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
Others |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
Total Payables to others |
|
$ |
1,429 |
|
|
$ |
1,423 |
|
|
The Company maintains a group of zero balance bank accounts which are included in payable to
others on the Statement of Financial Condition. Drafts payable represent the balance in these
accounts related to outstanding checks that have not yet been presented for payment at the bank.
The Company has sufficient funds on deposit to clear these checks, and these funds will be
transferred to the zero-balance accounts upon presentment.
19
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments:
FA Technology Ventures
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had a commitment to invest up to an additional $1.0 million in the
Partnership. The investment period expired in July 2006, however, the general partner of the
Partnership, FATV GP LLC (the General Partner), may continue to make capital calls up through
July 2011 for additional investments in portfolio companies and for the payment of management fees.
The Company intends to fund this commitment from operating cash flow. The Partnerships primary
purpose is to provide investment returns consistent with risks of investing in venture capital.
The majority of the limited partners of the Partnership are non-affiliates of the Company.
The General Partner is responsible for the management of the Partnership, including among other
things, making investments for the Partnership. The members of the General Partner are George
McNamee, a former Director of the Company, Broadpoint Enterprise Funding, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, and certain other employees of FATV. Subject to the terms of the
partnership agreement, under certain conditions, the General Partner is entitled to share in the
gains received by the Partnership in respect of its investment in a portfolio company.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had an additional commitment to invest up to $0.2 million in EIF.
The investment period expired in July 2006, but the General Partner may continue to make capital
calls up through July 2011 for additional investments in portfolio companies and for the payment of
management fees. The Company anticipates that this will be funded by the Company through operating
cash flow.
On April 30, 2008, the Company entered into a Transition Agreement (the Transition Agreement)
with FATV, FA Technology Holding, LLC and certain other employees of FATV, to effect a
restructuring of the investment management arrangements relating to the Partnership and the
formation of FA Technology Ventures III, L.P., a new venture capital fund (Fund III). Pursuant to
the Transition Agreement, among other things, the Company was to make a capital commitment of $10
million to Fund III and FATV was to cease advising the Partnership. The Transition Agreement
provided that if the initial closing of Fund III did not occur on or before March 31, 2009, the
Transition Agreement would automatically terminate. The initial closing of Fund III did not occur
on or before March 31, 2009, and the Transition Agreement terminated in accordance with its terms.
Mandatory Redeemable Preferred Stock
On June 27, 2008, the Company entered into a Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the Preferred
Stock Purchase Agreement) with Mast Credit Opportunities I Master Fund Limited, a Cayman Islands
corporation (Mast) for the issuance and sale of (i) 1,000,000 newly-issued unregistered shares of
Series B Mandatory Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (the Series B Preferred
Stock) and (ii) a warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock, at an
exercise price of $3.00 per share, for an aggregate cash purchase price of $25 million. Cash
dividends of 10 percent per annum must be paid quarterly on the Series B Preferred Stock, while an
additional dividend of 4 percent per annum accrues and is cumulative, if not otherwise paid
quarterly at the option of the Company. The Series B Preferred Stock must be redeemed on or before
June 27, 2012 (see Mandatory Redeemable Preferred Stock note).
Gleacher Partners
On June 5, 2009, the Company acquired Gleacher Partners, Inc. (Gleacher Partners), an
internationally recognized financial advisory boutique best known for advising major corporation in
mergers and acquisitions (the Gleacher Transaction). Pursuant to the related merger agreement
(the Merger Agreement), at the closing, the Company paid $10 million in cash and issued 23
million shares of Company Common Stock as merger consideration for all the outstanding shares of
Gleacher Partners. Of these shares, 14,542,035 shares were issued to Eric J. Gleacher, the founder
and Chairman of Gleacher Partners. All of the shares issued as merger consideration are subject to
resale restrictions. The Company is obligated to pay the shareholders an additional $10 million in
cash after five years, subject to acceleration under certain circumstances (see Acquisitions
note).
20
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Contingent Consideration:
On October 2, 2008, the Company acquired 100 percent of the outstanding common shares of American
Technology Research Holdings, Inc. (Broadpoint AmTech). The purchase price consisted of (i) $10
million in cash, (ii) 2,676,437 shares of common stock of the Company subject to transfer
restrictions lapsing ratably over the three years following the closing, and (iii) 323,563 shares
of restricted stock to be issued pursuant to the Companys 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan (the
Purchase Price Plan Shares).
The stock purchase agreement provides that, in the event that
Purchase Price Plan Shares are forfeited pursuant to the Companys 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan
(the Incentive Plan), shares will be reissued as Company common stock to certain other sellers
subject to transfer restrictions as above and not as shares under the 2007 Incentive Compensation
Plan. In addition, the stock purchase agreement provides that the sellers have the right to
receive earnout payments consisting of approximately 100 percent of the profits earned by
Broadpoint AmTech in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 and all of fiscal years 2009, 2010 and
2011, up to an aggregate of $15 million in such profits, and 50 percent of such profits in excess
of $15 million. All such earn-out payments will be paid 50 percent in cash and, depending on the
recipient thereof, either 50 percent in Company common stock, which will be subject to transfer
restrictions lapsing ratably over the three years following issuance, or 50 percent in restricted
stock from the Incentive Plan, subject to vesting based on continued employment with Broadpoint
AmTech. Based on the profits earned by Broadpoint AmTech in the first six months of fiscal year
2009, $1.6 million of contingent consideration has been accrued at June 30, 2009, $1.5 million of
which has been recorded as additional purchase price (goodwill).
Leases:
The Companys headquarters and sales offices, and certain office and communication equipment, are
leased under non-cancelable operating leases, certain of which contain renewal options and
escalation clauses, and which expire at various times through 2021. To the extent the Company is
provided tenant improvement allowances funded by the lessor, they are amortized over the initial
lease period and serve to reduce rent expense. To the extent the Company is provided free rent
periods, the Company recognizes the rent expense over the entire lease term on a straightline
basis.
Future minimum annual lease payments, and sublease rental income, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
Sublease |
|
|
|
|
Lease |
|
Rental |
|
Net Lease |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
Payments |
|
Income |
|
Payments |
|
2009 (remaining) |
|
$ |
4,443 |
|
|
$ |
988 |
|
|
$ |
3,455 |
|
2010 |
|
|
7,425 |
|
|
|
1,676 |
|
|
|
5,749 |
|
2011 |
|
|
6,523 |
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
2012 |
|
|
6,481 |
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
4,990 |
|
2013 |
|
|
6,382 |
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
4,950 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
30,830 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
29,587 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
62,084 |
|
|
$ |
8,321 |
|
|
$ |
53,763 |
|
|
Litigation:
In 1998, the Company was named in lawsuits by Lawrence Group, Inc. and certain related entities
(the Lawrence Parties) in connection with a private sale of Mechanical Technology Inc. stock from
the Lawrence Parties that was approved by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of New York (the Bankruptcy Court). The Company acted as placement agent in that sale,
and a number of persons who were employees and officers of the Company at that time, who have also
been named as defendants, purchased shares in the sale. The complaints alleged that the defendants
did not disclose certain information to the sellers and that the price approved by the court was therefore not proper. The cases were initially filed in the
Bankruptcy Court and the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (the
District Court), and were subsequently consolidated in the District Court. The District Court
dismissed the cases, and that decision was subsequently vacated by the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit, which remanded the cases for consideration of the plaintiffs
claims as motions to modify the Bankruptcy Court sale order. The plaintiffs claims were referred
back to the Bankruptcy Court for such consideration. In February 2009, the Bankruptcy Court
dismissed the motions in their entirety. Plaintiffs have filed a notice of appeal, which would be
heard by the District Court. The Company believes that it has strong defenses and intends to
vigorously defend itself against the plaintiffs claims, and believes the claims lack merit.
However, an unfavorable resolution could have
a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
position, results of operations and cash flows in the period which resolved. The appeal has been
stayed pending settlement discussions.
21
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Due to the nature of the Companys business, the Company and its subsidiaries are now, and likely
in the future will be, involved in a variety of legal proceedings, including the matters described
above. These include litigation, arbitrations and other proceedings initiated by private parties
and arising from our underwriting, financial advisory or other transactional activities, client
account activities and employment matters. Third parties who assert claims may do so for monetary
damages that are substantial, particularly relative to the Companys financial position. In
addition, the securities industry is highly regulated. The Company and its subsidiaries are
subject to both routine and unscheduled regulatory examinations of its business and investigations
of securities industry practices by governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations. In
recent years securities firms have been subject to increased scrutiny and regulatory enforcement
activity. Regulatory investigations can result in substantial fines being imposed on the Company
and/or its subsidiaries. Periodically the Company and its subsidiaries receive inquiries and
subpoenas from the SEC, state securities regulators and self-regulatory organizations. The Company
does not always know the purpose behind these communications or the status or target of any related
investigation. The responses to these communications have in the past resulted in the Company
and/or its subsidiaries being cited for regulatory deficiencies, although to date these
communications have not had a material adverse effect on the Companys business.
The Company has taken reserves in its financial statements with respect to legal proceedings to the
extent it believes appropriate. However, accurately predicting the timing and outcome of legal
proceedings, including the amounts of any settlements, judgments or fines, is inherently difficult
insofar as it depends on obtaining all of the relevant facts (which is sometimes not feasible) and
applying to them often-complex legal principles. Based on currently available information, the
Company does not believe that any litigation, proceeding or other matter to which it is a party or
otherwise involved will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of
operations and cash flows, although an adverse development, or an increase in associated legal
fees, could be material in a particular period, depending in part on the Companys operating
results in that period.
Other:
The Company, during the normal course of business, may guarantee certain debts on behalf of its
subsidiaries.
The Companys subsidiaries utilize various economic hedging strategies to actively manage their
market, credit and liquidity exposures. They also may purchase and sell securities on a
when-issued basis. At June 30, 2009, the Companys subsidiaries had no outstanding underwriting
commitments, had not purchased or sold any securities on a when-issued basis, had not entered into
any purchase agreements on TBAs, and had entered into sale agreements on TBAs in the notional
amount of $171.4 million.
11. Mandatory Redeemable Preferred Stock
On June 27, 2008, the Company entered into the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement with Mast for the
issuance and sale of (i) 1,000,000 newly-issued unregistered shares of Series B Preferred Stock,
and (ii) a warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock, at an exercise price
of $3.00 per share, for an aggregate cash purchase price of $25 million. The Series B Preferred
Stock is recorded as a liability per
SFAS No. 150, Accounting For Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities
and Equity. The warrant has been recorded as an equity instrument and initially valued using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement and the Series B Preferred Stock include, among other
things, certain negative covenants and other rights with respect to the operations, actions and
financial condition of the Company and its subsidiaries so long as the Series B Preferred Stock
remains outstanding. Cash dividends of 10 percent per annum must be paid on the Series B Preferred
Stock quarterly, while an additional dividend of 4 percent per annum accrues and is cumulative, if
not otherwise paid quarterly at the option of the Company. The Series B Preferred Stock must be
redeemed on or before June 27, 2012.
22
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The redemption prices are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium |
Date |
|
Call Factor |
|
Prior to and including June 26, 2009
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
From June 27, 2009 to December 27, 2009
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
From December 28, 2009 to June 27, 2010
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
From June 28, 2010 to December 27, 2011
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
From December 28, 2011 to June 2012
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
The Warrant is subject to customary anti-dilution provisions and expires June 27, 2012.
Concurrently with the execution of the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company and Mast
entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2008 (the Warrant Registration
Rights Agreement), with respect to the shares of Common Stock that are issuable to Mast pursuant
to the Warrant (the Warrant Shares). Pursuant to the Warrant Registration Rights Agreement, Mast
has the right to request registration of the Warrant Shares if at any time the Company proposes to
register common stock for its own account or for another, subject to certain exceptions for
underwriting requirements. In addition, under certain circumstances Mast may demand a registration
of no less than 300,000 Warrant Shares. The Company must register such Warrant Shares as soon as
practicable and in any event within forty-five (45) days after the demand. The Company will bear
all of the costs of all such registrations other than underwriting discounts and commissions and
certain other expenses.
Concurrently with the execution of the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company and Mast
entered into a Preemptive Rights Agreement (the Preemptive Rights Agreement). The Preemptive
Rights Agreement provides that in the event that the Company proposes to offer or sell any equity
securities of the Company below the current market price, the Company shall first offer such
securities to Mast to purchase; provided, however, that in the case of equity securities being
offered to MatlinPatterson FA Acquisition LLC (including its affiliated entities, other than the
Company, MatlinPatterson), Mast shall only have the right to purchase its pro rata share of such
securities (based upon common stock ownership on a fully diluted basis). If Mast exercises such
right to purchase the offered securities, Mast must purchase all (but not a portion) of such
securities for the price, terms and conditions so proposed. The preemptive rights do not extend to
(i) common stock issued to employees or directors pursuant to a plan or agreement approved by the
Board of Directors, (ii) issuance of securities pursuant to a conversion of convertible securities,
(iii) stock splits or stock dividends or (iv) issuance of securities in connection with a bona fide
business acquisition of or by the Company, whether by merger, consolidation, sale of assets, sale
or exchange of stock or otherwise.
12. Subordinated Debt
A select group of management and highly compensated employees are eligible to participate in the
Broadpoint Gleacher Securities Group, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Key Employees (the Key
Employees Plan). The employees enter into subordinated loans with Broadpoint Capital to provide
for the deferral of compensation and employer allocations under the Key Employees Plan. The New
York Stock Exchange approved Broadpoint Capitals subordinated debt agreements related to the Key
Employees Plan. Pursuant to these approvals, these amounts are allowable in Broadpoint Capitals
computation of net capital. The accounts of the participants of the Key Employees Plan are
credited with earnings and/or losses based on the performance of various investment benchmarks
selected by the participants. Maturities of the subordinated debt are based on the distribution
election made by each participant, which may be deferred to a later date by the participant. As of
February 28, 2007, the Company no longer permits any new amounts to be deferred under the Key
Employees Plan.
23
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Principal debt repayment requirements, which occur on or about April 15th of each year,
as of June 30, 2009, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 (remaining) |
|
$ |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
287 |
|
2011 |
|
|
108 |
|
2012 |
|
|
208 |
|
2013 |
|
|
185 |
|
2014 to 2016 |
|
|
409 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,197 |
|
|
13. Stockholders Equity
Deferred Compensation and Employee Stock Trust
The Company has adopted or may hereafter adopt various nonqualified deferred compensation plans
(the Plans) for the benefit of a select group of highly compensated employees who contribute
significantly to the continued growth and development and future business success of the Company.
Participants may elect under the Plans to have the value of their Plans Accounts track the
performance of one or more investment benchmarks available under the Plans, including Broadpoint
Gleacher Securities Group Common Stock Investment Benchmark, which tracks the performance of
Broadpoint Gleacher Securities Group, Inc. common stock (Company Stock). With respect to the
Broadpoint Gleacher Securities Group Common Stock Investment Benchmark, the Company contributes
Company Stock to a rabbi trust (the Trust) it has established in connection with meeting its
related liability under the Plans. As of February 28, 2007, the Company no longer permits any new
amounts to be deferred under its current Plans.
Assets of the Trust have been consolidated with those of the Company. The value of the Companys
stock at the time contributed to the Trust has been classified in stockholders equity and
generally accounted for in a manner similar to treasury stock.
The deferred compensation arrangement requires the related liability to be settled by delivery of a
fixed number of shares of Company stock. Accordingly, the related liability is classified in
equity under deferred compensation and changes in the fair market value of the amount owed to the
participant in the Plan is not recognized.
Gleacher Transaction
On June 5, 2009, the Company completed the Gleacher Transaction. Pursuant to the related Merger
Agreement, at the closing, the Company paid $10 million in cash and issued 23 million shares of
Company Common Stock as merger consideration for all the outstanding
shares of Gleacher Partners. Of these shares, 14,542,035 shares were issued to
Eric J. Gleacher, the founder and Chairman of Gleacher Partners. All of the shares issued as merger consideration are subject to resale
restrictions. The Company is obligated to pay the shareholders an additional $10 million in cash
after five years, subject to acceleration under certain circumstances (see Acquisitions note).
Registration Rights Agreement
On June 5, 2009, upon the closing of the Gleacher Transaction, the Company and Eric J. Gleacher
entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the Registration Rights Agreement). The
Registration Rights Agreement entitles Mr. Gleacher, subject to limited exceptions, to have his
shares included in any registration statement filed by the Company in connection with a public
offering solely for cash, a right often
referred to as a piggyback registration right. Mr. Gleacher also has the right to require the
Company to prepare and file a shelf registration statement to permit the sale to the public from
time to time of the shares
of Company common stock that Mr. Gleacher received on the closing of the Gleacher Transaction.
However, the Company is not required to file the shelf registration statement until the third anniversary of the closing of the
Gleacher Transaction.
The Company has agreed to pay all expenses in connection with any
registration effected pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement. The Registration Rights
Agreement may be amended with the written consent of the Company and of the holders representing a
majority of Company common stock that is registrable pursuant thereto.
24
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
14. Income Taxes
The Company records its income tax provision using the asset and liability method in accordance
with Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No.
109). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences
attributable to temporary differences between amounts reported for income tax purposes and
financial statement purposes, reflected at tax rates expected to be applicable when these temporary
differences reverse. Valuation allowances are established if management anticipates that it is
more likely than not that some or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Significant
management judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets
and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets.
The
effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 is 15.1 percent and 25.5 percent,
respectively. The Companys effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate primarily due to
the Companys valuation allowance, the impact of Internal Revenue Code Section 382 which limits the
use of net operating losses, state and local income taxes, non-deductible expenses such as
Mandatory Redeemable Preferred Stock dividends, and a portion of meals and entertainment. The
effective tax rate also reflects a $6.0 million discrete benefit due to the tax valuation allowance
reduction triggered by the Gleacher Partners acquisition.
The valuation allowance reduction relates specifically to deferred tax liabilities recorded in
purchase accounting in connection with the Gleacher transaction. These liabilities are expected to
support the realization of an equal amount of the Companys net deferred tax assets. As a result,
the valuation allowance was reduced and recorded as a benefit to the tax provision pursuant to U.S.
GAAP. The deferred tax liabilities resulted predominantly from the excess of Gleacher Partners
book basis over tax basis in the intangible assets recorded as a result of the acquisition (trade
name, back log, non-compete agreements, customer relationships). Excluding this discrete item the
effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 would have been 46.7 percent.
Consistent with the prior year end, the Company continues to maintain a full valuation allowance at
June 30, 2009. The valuation allowance was established as a result of weighing all positive and
negative evidence regarding the realizability of the Companys deferred tax assets. Management
reviews the valuation allowance quarterly and will maintain the valuation allowance until
sufficient positive evidence exists to support a reduction. In determining the appropriate
valuation allowance, management is required to make judgments and estimates related to projections
of profitability, the timing and extent of the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards,
applicable tax rates and tax planning strategies. Because negative evidence such as cumulative
losses in recent periods is afforded more weight than forecasts for future periods, it is managements
conclusion that a full valuation allowance is appropriate at this time. However, if we continue to
experience improved profitability, we may be required to release a portion or all of this valuation
allowance before the end of this year, possibly as soon as next quarter, although the exact timing
and the portion of the valuation allowance released are subject to change based on the level of
profitability that we are able to achieve for the remainder of 2009 and our visibility into future
period results. Any reduction of the valuation allowance will be recorded as a tax benefit in the
period of the change, which may significantly increase our reported net income. The valuation
allowance is approximately $17.9 million at June 30, 2009 and was $24.7 million at December 31,
2008. The change in the valuation allowance is primarily due to the deferred tax liabilities of
approximately $6.0 million recorded as part of the Gleacher Partners acquisition.
25
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
As a result of the closing of the MatlinPatterson investment transaction on September 21, 2007 the
Company underwent a change in ownership within the meaning of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue
Code (IRC Section 382). In general, IRC Section 382 places an annual limitation on the use of
certain tax attributes such as net operating losses and tax credit carryovers in existence at the
ownership change date. The Company has determined that the limitation on the use of its net
operating loss carryforwards is approximately $1.1 million per year. The Company is engaged in a
study to finalize this estimate, and any difference is not expected to have a material impact on
the financial statements.
The Company reported a tax expense of approximately $2.9 million and $0.8 million for the quarters
ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively. The Company reported a tax expense of
approximately $7.2 million and $1.5 million for the six months ended as of June 30, 2009 and June
30, 2008, respectively. Included in the first six months of the 2009 tax provision is
approximately $0.04 million in the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits related to the current
year that, if recognized in the future, would affect the effective tax rate.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had accrued approximately $0.24 million and
$0.2 million, respectively, of interest and penalties included as a component of the unrecognized
tax benefit.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as state and local
income tax, primarily relating to New York State and New York City. As of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, with few exceptions, the Company and its subsidiaries were no longer subject to
U.S. federal tax or state and local income tax examinations for years before 2004. The Company
presently has an ongoing audit with the State of New York.
15. Stock-Based Compensation Plans
The Company has established equity incentive plans pursuant to which employees and non-employee
directors of the Company have been awarded stock options, restricted stock and/or restricted stock
units, which expire at various times through April 25, 2017. The following is a recap of all plans
as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Shares authorized for issuance |
|
|
43,493,791 |
|
|
Share awards used: |
|
|
|
|
Stock options granted and outstanding |
|
|
7,514,444 |
|
Restricted stock awards granted and unvested |
|
|
6,530,611 |
|
Restricted stock units granted and unvested |
|
|
6,984,840 |
|
Restricted stock units granted and vested |
|
|
2,651,936 |
|
Restricted stock units committed not yet granted |
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
Total share awards used |
|
|
24,056,831 |
|
|
Shares available for future awards |
|
|
19,436,960 |
|
|
For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, total compensation expense for
share based payment arrangements was $4.8 million and $3.2 million, respectively. There was no
related tax benefit for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively.
At June 30, 2009, the total compensation expense related to non-vested awards (which are expected
to vest) not yet recognized is $27.6 million, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining
weighted average vesting period of 3.0 years. At June 30, 2008, the total compensation expense
related to non-vested awards not yet recognized was $20.5 million.
The Incentive Plan allows awards in the form of incentive stock options (within the meaning of
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code), nonqualified stock options, performance awards, or other
stock based awards. The Incentive Plan imposes a limit on the number of shares of the Companys
common stock that may be subject to awards. On February 6, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized, and on June 5, 2008, the Companys shareholders approved, an additional 10.675 million
shares for issuance pursuant to the Incentive Plan. On April 16, 2009, in connection with amending
and restating the Incentive Plan, the Companys Board of Directors authorized and on June 16, 2009,
the Companys shareholders approved an additional 5 million shares for issuance pursuant to the
Incentive Plan. An award relating to shares may be granted if the aggregate number of
shares subject to then-outstanding awards, under the plan and under the pre-existing plans, plus
the number of shares subject to the award being granted do not exceed the sum of (A) 25 percent of
the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the grant plus (B)
15.675 million shares.
26
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The 2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan (the 2003 Director Plan) allows awards in the form of
stock options and restricted shares. The 2003 Director Plan imposes a limit on the number of
shares of our common stock that may be subject to awards. On April 16, 2009, in connection with
amending and restating the 2003 Plan, the Companys Board of Directors authorized and on June 16,
2009, the Companys shareholders approved, increasing the number of shares available for issuance
from 100,000 to 2,000,000 shares.
The restricted stock units committed, but not yet granted, are based on employment agreements with
the Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Operating Officer. The employment
agreements set forth a vesting schedule for such restricted stock units, and, with respect to
certain of such restricted stock units, performance targets as determined by the Board of Directors
in consultation with such officer.
Options: Options granted under the plans established by the Company have been granted at
not less than fair market value, vest over a maximum of five years, and expire one to ten years
after grant date. Unvested options are typically forfeited upon termination. Option transactions
for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009, under the plans were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Shares Subject |
|
Average Exercise |
|
|
to Option |
|
Price |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
7,390,996 |
|
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
197,322 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(73,874 |
) |
|
|
8.90 |
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
7,514,444 |
|
|
$ |
2.63 |
|
|
At June 30, 2009, 2,688,790 stock options were exercisable and had a remaining average contractual
term of 2.3 years and had an intrinsic value of $9,552,957.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding under the plans at June
30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
Exercisable |
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
Price |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Life |
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
Range |
|
Shares |
|
(years) |
|
Price |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
$1.43-$2.31
|
|
|
3,850,000 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
|
2,566,668 |
|
|
$ |
1.86 |
|
$3.00-$4.00
|
|
|
3,500,000 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$4.61-$5.80
|
|
|
140,681 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
|
|
|
98,359 |
|
|
|
5.59 |
|
$6.00-$7.17
|
|
|
12,666 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
6.47 |
|
|
|
12,666 |
|
|
|
6.47 |
|
$8.23-$14.98
|
|
|
11,097 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
11,097 |
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,514,444 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.63 |
|
|
|
2,688,790 |
|
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
|
The Black-Scholes option pricing model is used to determine the fair value of options granted. For
the six-months ended June 30, 2009, and the twelve-months ended December 31, 2008, significant
assumptions used to estimate the fair value of share based compensation awards include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Expected term |
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
63.5 |
% |
|
|
54.0 |
% |
Expected dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.2%-3.0 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
Restricted Stock Awards/Restricted Stock Units: Restricted stock awards under the plans
have been valued at the market value of the Companys common stock as of the grant date and are
amortized over the period in which the restrictions are outstanding, which is typically 3-5 years.
The Incentive Plan also allows for grants of restricted stock units.
Restricted stock units give a
participant the right to receive fully vested shares at the end of a specified deferral period.
Restricted stock units are generally subject to forfeiture conditions similar to those of the
Companys restricted stock awards granted under its other stock incentive plans historically. One
advantage of restricted stock units, as compared to restricted stock, is that the period during
which the award is deferred as to settlement can be extended past the date the award becomes
non-forfeitable, allowing a participant to hold an interest tied to common stock on a tax deferred
basis. Prior to settlement, restricted stock units carry no voting or dividend rights associated
with the stock ownership.
27
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Restricted stock awards/Restricted stock units for the period ended June 30, 2009, under the plans
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant- |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Unvested |
|
Date |
|
Unvested |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
Restricted |
|
Restricted |
|
Restricted |
|
|
Awards |
|
Stock |
|
Stock Units |
|
Stock Unit |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
7,337,546 |
|
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
|
6,303,214 |
|
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
Granted |
|
|
604,795 |
|
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
|
2,052,062 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(1,270,065 |
) |
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
|
(767,936 |
) |
|
|
1.77 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(141,665 |
) |
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
|
(602,500 |
) |
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
6,530,611 |
|
|
$ |
2.01 |
|
|
|
6,984,840 |
|
|
$ |
2.34 |
|
|
The total fair value of awards vested, based on the fair market value of the stock on the vest
date, during the six-month periods ending June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $4.7 million and $0.2 million,
respectively.
16. Net Capital Requirements
Broadpoint Capital is subject to the net capital requirements of Rule 15c3-1 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the Net Capital Rule), which requires the maintenance of a
minimum net capital. Broadpoint Capital has elected to use the alternative method permitted by the
rule, which requires it to maintain a minimum net capital amount of 2 percent of aggregate debit
balances arising from customer transactions as defined or $0.25 million, whichever is greater. As
of June 30, 2009, Broadpoint Capital had net capital, as defined, of $30.5 million and $30.2
million in excess of the $0.25 million required minimum net capital.
Broadpoint AmTech is also subject to the net capital rule which requires the maintenance of minimum
net capital of $0.10 million or 6 2/3 percent of aggregate indebtedness, whichever is greater.
Aggregate indebtedness to net capital must also not exceed 15:1. At June 30, 2009, Broadpoint
AmTech had net capital, as defined, of $1.7 million, which was $1.4 million in excess of its
required minimum net capital of $0.3 million. Broadpoint AmTech ratio of aggregate indebtedness to
net capital was 2.57:1.
Gleacher Partners LLC is also subject to the net capital rule which requires the maintenance of
minimum net capital. Gleacher Partners LLC has elected to use the alternative method permitted by
the rule, which requires it to maintain a minimum net capital amount of 2 percent of aggregate
debit balances arising from customer transactions as defined or $0.25 million, whichever is
greater. As of June 30, 2009, Gleacher Partners LLC had net capital, as defined, of $1.0 million
which was $0.8 million in excess of the $0.25 million required minimum net capital.
17. Derivative Financial Instruments
Market Risk
Derivative financial instruments involve varying degrees of off-balance sheet market risk, whereby
changes in the level or volatility of interest rates, or market values of the underlying financial
instruments may result in
changes in the value of a particular financial instrument in excess of
the amounts currently reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition as
Securities owned and Securities sold but not yet purchased at fair value, with realized and
unrealized gains and losses recognized in principal transactions in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations on a trade date basis.
28
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Derivatives entered into by the Companys subsidiaries include sale agreements on TBAs. The
subsidiaries enter into derivatives to manage the risk exposure
arising from their inventory accounts. The settlement of these
transactions is not expected to have a material effect upon the Companys condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Derivative Financial Instruments
SFAS No 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, requires recognition
of all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the condensed consolidated
statement of financial condition and distinguishes derivative instruments designated as fair value
hedge, cash flow hedge and hedges of a foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign
operation.
Derivative financial instruments involve degrees of off-balance sheet market risk, whereby changes
in the level or volatility of interest rates, or market values of the underlying financial
instruments may result in changes in the value of a particular financial instrument in excess of
the amounts currently reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition as
Securities owned and Securities sold but not yet purchased at fair value, with realized and
unrealized gains and losses recognized in principal transactions in the condensed consolidated
statement of operations on a trade date basis.
The Companys subsidiaries utilize various economic hedging strategies to actively manage their
market, credit and liquidity exposures. The subsidiaries also may purchase and sell securities on a
when-issued basis. At June 30, 2009, the Companys subsidiaries had no outstanding underwriting
commitments and had not purchased or sold any securities on a when-issued basis. At June 30, 2009,
they had sales agreements on TBAs of $171.4 million with $0.9 million of unrealized losses
recorded as Securities sold but not yet purchased at fair value and $0.02 million of unrealized
gains recorded in Securities owned on the condensed consolidated statement of financial condition.
The gains and losses on the designated hedge derivatives as well as the offsetting gains and losses
on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in current earnings in principal
transactions in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. During the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, the Company recorded a loss of $0.3 million and a gain of
$0.6 million respectively, related to the TBAs.
18. Segment Analysis
In an effort to reflect the Companys segments in a manner more consistent with the way in which
they are managed, the Company commenced reporting five business segments rather than the previously
reported three business segments, beginning in the third quarter of 2008. The Equities segment was
previously reported as two segments. Equities and Investment Banking and the Fixed Income segment
are now reported as two segments, Broadpoint Descap and Debt Capital Markets. Prior period
disclosures have been adjusted to conform to this presentation.
The Company provides services and generates revenues through our Broadpoint DESCAP, Debt Capital
Markets, Investment Banking, Equities, and Other segments:
|
|
|
Broadpoint Descap Broadpoint Descap provides sales and trading on a
wide range of mortgage and asset-backed securities, U.S. Treasury and
government agency securities, structured products such as CLOs
(collateralized loan obligations) and CDOs (collateralized debt
obligations), whole loans, swaps, and other securities. Broadpoint
Descap generates revenues from spreads and fees on trades executed on
behalf of clients and from principal transactions executed to
facilitate trades for clients. |
29
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Debt Capital Markets The Companys Debt Capital Markets team
provides sales and trading of corporate debt securities, including
bank debt, investment grade and high-yield debt, convertibles,
distressed debt and preferred stock. A team of 12 desk analyst
professionals provides quantitative and market-based analysis on
various credit securities to generate trading ideas for the benefit of
the teams institutional investor clients. The Debt Capital Markets
team also provides execution services for new issue activities and
liability management activities including open market repurchases,
tender offers and exchange offers. The Company formed the Debt Capital
Markets group during the first quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Investment Banking The Investment Banking team offers a broad range
of financial advisory services in regards to mergers and acquisitions,
restructurings and corporate finance related matters. In addition, it
raises capital for corporate clients through underwritings and private
placements of debt and equity securities. The investment banking
business includes its restructuring business, comprised of 25
professionals and the recently acquired Gleacher Partners LLC
subsidiary. |
|
|
|
|
Equities The Companys Equities group, operating through its
Broadpoint AmTech broker-dealer subsidiary, provides research-driven
sales and trading on equity securities and generates revenues through
cash commissions on customer trades and hard-dollar fees for research
and other services. The groups 17 research professionals develop
relationships with corporate management teams of issuers they cover
and maintain networks of industry contacts to gain proprietary data
points to support investment theses. |
|
|
|
|
Other The Companys Other segment includes the results from its
venture capital business and costs related to corporate overhead and
support including various fees associated with legal and settlement
expenses. This segment generates venture capital business revenue
through the management and investment of venture capital funds. |
The Companys business segments generate two types of revenues. Sales and Trading net revenues
consist of revenues derived from commissions, principal transactions, net interest, and other fee
related revenues. Investment Banking net revenues consist of revenues derived from a broad range
of financial advisory services. Certain expenses not directly associated with specific reportable
business segments were not allocated to each reportable business segments net profits. These
expenses are reflected in the Other segment.
Information concerning operations in these segments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Net revenue (including net interest income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadpoint Descap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and Trading |
|
$ |
37,982 |
|
|
$ |
10,572 |
|
|
$ |
65,473 |
|
|
$ |
21,310 |
|
Investment Banking |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
Total Broadpoint Descap |
|
|
38,319 |
|
|
|
10,621 |
|
|
|
66,190 |
|
|
|
21,395 |
|
|
Debt Capital Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and Trading |
|
|
33,253 |
|
|
|
11,715 |
|
|
|
64,082 |
|
|
|
15,415 |
|
Investment Banking |
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
|
2,205 |
|
|
|
4,671 |
|
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
Total Debt Capital Markets |
|
|
36,054 |
|
|
|
13,920 |
|
|
|
68,753 |
|
|
|
17,780 |
|
|
Equities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and Trading |
|
|
5,758 |
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
|
|
11,865 |
|
|
|
3,484 |
|
Investment Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
Total Equities |
|
|
5,758 |
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
|
11,865 |
|
|
|
3,918 |
|
|
Investment Banking |
|
|
9,659 |
|
|
|
6,635 |
|
|
|
12,599 |
|
|
|
7,101 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
2,955 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
3,898 |
|
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
Total Net Revenue |
|
$ |
92,745 |
|
|
$ |
34,080 |
|
|
$ |
163,305 |
|
|
$ |
51,423 |
|
|
Profit/(loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadpoint Descap |
|
$ |
14,974 |
|
|
$ |
4,411 |
|
|
$ |
27,964 |
|
|
$ |
9,003 |
|
Debt Capital Markets |
|
|
6,909 |
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
11,073 |
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
Equities |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
(2,162 |
) |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
(4,746 |
) |
Investment Banking |
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
Other |
|
|
(5,264 |
) |
|
|
(6,246 |
) |
|
|
(13,376 |
) |
|
|
(15,090 |
) |
|
Profit/(loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations |
|
$ |
19,015 |
|
|
$ |
(253 |
) |
|
$ |
28,351 |
|
|
$ |
(8,728 |
) |
|
30
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The Companys segments financial policies are the same as those described in the Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies note in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008. All assets are primarily located in the United States of America.
19. Related Party Transactions
From time to time, the Company provides Investment Banking services to MatlinPatterson or its
affiliated entities, which services are provided by Broadpoint Capital, Inc. in the ordinary course
of its business. Investment banking revenue from related parties disclosed on the condensed
consolidated statement of operations represents $5.8 million and $6.1 million of fees earned for
the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $4.8 million and $5.8 million of fees earned for the three-month periods ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, for advisory engagements performed for MatlinPatterson or its
affiliated entities.
In addition, from time to time, Broadpoint Capital provides brokerage services to MatlinPatterson
or its affiliated entities, which services are provided by Broadpoint Capital in the ordinary
course of its business. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, MatlinPatterson
paid $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, and $0.03 million and $0.3 million for the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, to Broadpoint Capital for such
services. This revenue is included in principal transactions in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations.
20. Discontinued Operations
On September 14, 2007, the Company completed an asset sale agreement with DEPFA BANK plc for the
sale of the Municipal Capital Markets Group of the Companys subsidiary, Broadpoint Capital in
connection with which the Company recognized a pre-tax gain on sale in the amount of $7.9 million.
The Company continues to report the receipt and settlement of pending contractual obligations
related to this transaction as discontinued operations.
Amounts reflected as discontinued operations on the condensed consolidated statements of operations
are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Net revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Capital Markets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Capital Markets |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Fixed Income Middle Markets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Private Client Group |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
Taxable Fixed Income |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Net (Loss)/Income |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
(79 |
) |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
(74 |
) |
|
Municipal Capital Markets
The revenue and expenses for the Municipal Capital Markets division for the three and six-months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 represents the residual activity of that operation during that time
period. No interest has been
allocated to Municipal Capital Markets since this division was
closed. Prior to closing this division, interest was allocated primarily based on the level of
securities owned attributable to this division.
31
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Fixed Income Middle Markets
The expense of the Fixed Income Middle Markets division for the three and six-months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 represents the residual activity of the operations during that time period. No
interest has been allocated to Fixed Income Middle Markets since this division was closed. Prior
to closing this division, interest was allocated primarily based on the level of securities owned
attributable to this division.
Private Client Group
The Private Client Groups activity for the three and six-months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30,
2008, respectively, relates primarily to legal matters which were related to the operations prior
to its disposal. For the periods presented, interest was not allocated to the Private Client
Group.
Taxable Fixed Income
The expense of the Taxable Fixed Income Corporate Bond division for the three and six-months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 represents the residual activity of the operations during that time period.
No interest has been allocated to Taxable Fixed Income since this division was closed. Prior to
closing this division, interest was allocated primarily based on the level of securities owned
attributable to this division.
21. Restructuring
On October 17, 2007, the Company announced a plan whereby the Company determined that it would
outsource certain of its administrative functions, consolidate certain of such functions in its New
York City location, and reduce staff in order to properly size its business consistent with its
then current levels of activity. In connection with the plan, the Company recognized approximately
$2.1 million of expense in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, of which $1.1 million relates
to termination benefits and $1.0 million, is related to occupancy and other expenses. The Company
completed its restructuring plan to properly size its infrastructure in the third quarter of 2008.
A summary of restructuring charges incurred as part of this plan are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Severance |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
349 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
Real Estate Exit Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
819 |
|
Asset Impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total Restructuring Charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,063 |
|
|
In connection with the plan, the Company has a remaining liability of approximately $1.1 million at
June 30, 2009, most of which relates to real estate exit/impairment costs. These real estate
leases will expire between 2010 and 2015.
32
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following tables summarize the changes in the Companys liability relating to the plan for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
Sublease Income |
|
|
437 |
|
Real Estate revaluation |
|
|
197 |
|
Payment of exit expenses |
|
|
(946 |
) |
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,104 |
|
|
22. Acquisitions
As part of the Companys strategy of building a premier investment bank though strategic
acquisitions, on June 5, 2009, the Company completed the Gleacher Transaction. Pursuant to the
related Merger Agreement, at the closing, the Company paid $10 million in cash and issued 23
million shares of Company Common Stock as merger consideration for all of the outstanding shares of
Gleacher Partners. Of these shares, 14,542,035 shares were issued to Eric J. Gleacher, the founder
and Chairman of Gleacher Partners. All of the shares issued as merger consideration are subject to
resale restrictions. The Company is obligated to pay the shareholders an additional $10 million in
cash after five years, subject to acceleration under certain circumstances.
The consideration paid by the Company in the Gleacher Transaction was valued at $88.93 million,
consisting of cash of $10 million and the Companys common stock, with a fair value of $69.23
million. Intangible assets purchased by the Company consisted of a trade name ($7.30 million);
backlog ($0.42 million); a non-compete agreement ($0.70 million); and customer relationships ($6.50
million). The excess of the cost of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed representing
goodwill and going concern value of $74.01 million, was recognized as an asset on the
Companys condensed consolidated statement of financial
condition. In managements opinion, this goodwill and going
concern value reflects the strong presence, reputation and expertise
of Gleacher in the advisory business. The combined strength of
Broadpoints sales, trading and research in fixed income, equity
and mortgage and asset-backed securities with Gleachers highly
respected advisory business creates synergies for both Broadpoint and
Gleacher Partners. Under generally accepted
accounting principles, Broadpoint is required to record deferred tax liabilities as part of
purchase accounting for the Gleacher Partners acquisition. Goodwill was adjusted by $6.0 million to
$80.0 million predominantly as the result of the excess of
Gleacher Partners book basis in its
intangible assets (trade name, back-log, non-compete agreements, customer relationships)
over their tax basis. Of the total amount recorded to goodwill $6.61
million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The business enterprise value of Gleacher
Partners was based upon an independent third party valuation. The transaction included terms
calling for a post-closing purchase price adjustment equal to the actual net tangible book value
compared to the target amount. The Company has established, on the condensed consolidated
statement of financial condition, a liability in the amount of $2.16 million with respect to the
potential obligation of the Company to pay to the former owners of Gleacher Partners Inc. amounts
under this purchase price adjustment feature. In conjunction with
this acquisition, related acquisition costs of approximately $0.44
million were incurred and included in Other expenses in the condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
For the period June 6, 2009 thru June 30, 2009, Gleacher Partners had net revenues of $0.1 million
and a net loss of $0.7 million.
33
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed
at the date of the acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
|
As of |
|
June 5, 2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,440 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
93 |
|
Office equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
145 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
368 |
|
|
Total Assets acquired |
|
$ |
4,046 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
458 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
Total Liabilities assumed |
|
$ |
1,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
2,158 |
|
|
The following table presents pro forma information as if the acquisition of Gleacher Partners had
occurred on January 1, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
97,054 |
|
|
$ |
34,291 |
|
|
$ |
170,123 |
|
|
$ |
53,862 |
|
|
Total expenses (excluding interest) |
|
|
75,906 |
|
|
|
37,047 |
|
|
|
139,746 |
|
|
|
65,777 |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
|
21,148 |
|
|
|
(2,756 |
) |
|
|
30,377 |
|
|
|
(11,915 |
) |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
3,057 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
7,416 |
|
|
|
1,582 |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
18,091 |
|
|
|
(3,519 |
) |
|
|
22,961 |
|
|
|
(13,497 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, (net of taxes) (see
Discontinued Operations note) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
18,077 |
|
|
$ |
(3,598 |
) |
|
$ |
22,989 |
|
|
$ |
(13,571 |
) |
|
23. Subsequent Events
The Company evaluated subsequent events through August 14, 2009, the date the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements were issued.
On August 3, 2009, the Company completed the underwritten public offering of its common stock,
consisting of 14,000,000 shares issued and sold by the Company and 9,500,000 shares sold by certain
of the Companys existing shareholders pursuant to an effective registration statement. The
proceeds to the Company from the offering, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, were
approximately $82.7 million before payment of expenses related to the underwriting. The Company
will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling shareholders. The
Company has granted to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 2,000,000
shares, and one of the selling shareholders has granted to the underwriters a 30-day option to
purchase up to an additional 1,525,000 shares, in each case to cover over-allotments, if any.
34
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
There are included or incorporated by reference in this document statements that may constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. These forward-looking statements are usually preceded by words such as may, will,
expect, anticipate, believe, estimate, and continue or similar words. All statements
other than historical information or current facts should be considered forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements may contain projections regarding revenues, earnings, operations, and
other financial projections, and may include statements of future performance, strategies and
objectives. However, there may be events in the future which the Company is not able to accurately
predict or control which may cause actual results to differ, possibly materially, from the
expectations set forth in the Companys forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those discussed as a
result of various factors. Such factors include, among others, market risk, credit risk and
operating risk. These and other risks are set forth in greater detail throughout this document.
The Company does not intend or assume any obligation to update any forward-looking information it
makes.
Business Overview
The Company is an independent investment bank providing value-added advice and services to
corporations and institutional investors. The Company has rapidly transformed its business by
making strategic acquisitions and hires, expanding businesses, increasing productivity and
rationalizing its cost structure.
The Company provides services and generates revenues through our Broadpoint DESCAP, Debt Capital
Markets, Investment Banking, Equities, and Other segments:
|
|
|
Broadpoint Descap Broadpoint Descap provides sales
and trading on a wide range of mortgage and
asset-backed securities, U.S. Treasury and government
agency securities, structured products such as CLOs
(collateralized loan obligations) and CDOs
(collateralized debt obligations), whole loans, swaps,
and other securities. Broadpoint Descap generates
revenues from spreads and fees on trades executed on
behalf of clients and from principal transactions
executed to facilitate trades for clients. Broadpoint
Descap has not incurred losses from exposure to
subprime or toxic mortgage-backed securities. |
|
|
|
|
Debt Capital Markets The Companys Debt Capital
Markets team provides sales and trading of corporate
debt securities, including bank debt, investment grade
and high-yield debt, convertibles, distressed debt and
preferred stock. A team of 12 desk analyst
professionals provides quantitative and market-based
analysis on various credit securities to generate
trading ideas for the benefit of the teams
institutional investor clients. The Debt Capital
Markets team also provides execution services for new
issue activities and liability management activities
including open market repurchases, tender offers and
exchange offers. The Company formed the Debt Capital
Markets group during the first quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Investment Banking With the Companys recently
acquired Gleacher Partners LLC subsidiary, its a
leading corporate advisory firm providing strategic
financial advice to corporations globally. The
Investment Banking team offers a broad range of
financial advisory services in regards to mergers and
acquisitions, restructurings and corporate finance
related matters. In addition, it raises capital for
corporate clients through underwritings and private
placements of debt and equity securities. The teams
investment banking business includes its restructuring
business, comprised of 25 professionals. The
Companys acquisition of Gleacher Partners closed on
June 5, 2009. Gleacher Partners operations had a
nominal impact on its second quarter 2009 financial
results. |
|
|
|
|
Equities The Companys Equities group, operating through its
Broadpoint AmTech broker-dealer subsidiary, provides research-driven
sales and trading on equity securities and generates revenues through cash commissions on customer trades and hard-dollar
fees for research and other services. The groups 17 research
professionals develop relationships with corporate management teams of
issuers they cover and maintain networks of industry contacts to gain
proprietary data points to support investment theses. These
professionals communicate their views via published research, in
person and hosted meetings, conferences and other investor events. |
35
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Other The Companys Other segment includes the results from its
venture capital business and costs related to corporate overhead and
support including various fees associated with legal and settlement
expenses. This segment generates venture capital business revenue
through the management and investment of venture capital funds. |
In March 2008, the Company and Broadpoint Capital completed its hiring of 47 employees of the New
Jersey-based Fixed Income division of BNY Capital Markets, Inc. and the acquisition of certain
related assets. The Company has formed a new Debt Capital Markets division with the new employees
that provide sales and trading of corporate debt securities, including bank debt, investment grade
debt, high-yield debt, convertibles, distressed debt, and preferred stock. The Debt Capital
Markets team also provides execution services for new issue activities and liability management
activities, including open market repurchases, tender offers and exchange offers.
On March 4, 2008, the Company completed the sale of 11,579,592 shares of the Companys common stock
in a private placement for $19.7 million, or approximately $1.70 per share. In connection
therewith, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with MatlinPatterson, Mast, and
certain other investors, which required the Company to file a registration statement on Form S-3
for the resale of the shares purchased by the lead investor, Mast, which purchased 7.1 million of
the shares issued, on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act.
Such registration statement was filed and thereafter became effective on April 29, 2008.
On June 27, 2008, the Company entered into a Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement with Mast, for the
issuance and sale of (i) 1,000,000 newly-issued unregistered shares of Series B Mandatory
Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Company, par value $1.00 per share (the Series B Preferred
Stock), and (ii) a warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock, par value
$.01 per share, at an exercise price of $3.00 per share, for an aggregate cash purchase price of
$25 million.
In October 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of Broadpoint AmTech, the parent of American
Technology Research, Inc., a broker-dealer specializing in institutional research, sales and
trading in the information technology, cleantech and defense areas. In connection with the
reorganization of its legacy equities business, the Company recorded a charge in the third quarter
of approximately $1.8 million relating to compensation and other expenses.
On October 16, 2008, the Company completed the merger of two of its principal broker-dealer
subsidiaries, Broadpoint Capital, Inc. and Broadpoint Securities, Inc. The two firms were merged
into a single broker-dealer under the name Broadpoint Capital, Inc.
On June 5, 2009, the Company completed the Gleacher Transaction. Pursuant to the related Merger
Agreement, at the closing, the Company paid $10 million in cash and issued 23 million shares of
Company Common Stock as merger consideration for all the outstanding shares of Gleacher Partners.
Of these shares, 14,542,035 shares were issued to Eric J. Gleacher, the founder and Chairman of
Gleacher Partners. All of the shares issued as merger consideration are subject to resale
restrictions. The Company is obligated to pay the shareholders an additional $10 million in cash
after five years, subject to acceleration under certain circumstances (see Acquisitions note to
the condensed consolidated financial statements).
On August 3, 2009, the Company completed the underwritten public offering of its common stock,
consisting of 14,000,000 shares issued and sold by the Company and 9,500,000 shares sold by certain
of the Companys existing shareholders pursuant to an effective registration statement. The
proceeds to the Company from the offering, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, were
approximately $82.7 million before payment of expenses related to the underwriting. The Company will not receive any of the proceeds from the
sale of shares by the selling shareholders. The Company has granted to the underwriters a 30-day
option to purchase up to an additional 2,000,000 shares, and one of the selling shareholders has
granted to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,525,000 shares, in
each case to cover over-allotments, if any.
36
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
RESTRUCTURING
In 2007, the Company implemented a restructuring plan to properly size the Companys infrastructure
with its then current level of activity. As a result, the Company incurred approximately $2.1
million in restructuring costs during the first six months of 2008 and incurred $2.8 million in
restructuring costs during the fourth quarter of 2007. The plan included a reduction in IT and
operations support headcount, outsourcing the Companys clearing operations, and eliminating excess
office space. The Company completed its restructuring plan to properly size its infrastructure in
the third quarter of 2008.
37
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Financial Overview
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Net revenues for the second quarter of 2009 were $92.7 million, an increase of $58.7 million, or
172 percent, from $34.1 million in the second quarter of 2008. Pre-tax profit from continuing operations
in the second quarter was $19.0 million compared to a loss of $0.3 million in the prior year
quarter. The Company reported a net profit of $16.1 million, or $0.19 per common share, for the
second quarter of 2009, compared to a net loss of $1.1 million, or $0.02 loss per common share, for
the second quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal transactions |
|
$ |
65,264 |
|
|
$ |
20,867 |
|
Commissions |
|
|
4,693 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
Investment banking |
|
|
8,199 |
|
|
|
3,529 |
|
Investment banking revenue from
related party |
|
|
4,837 |
|
|
|
5,755 |
|
Investment gains |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Interest |
|
|
11,504 |
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
Fees and other |
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
97,167 |
|
|
|
35,089 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,422 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
92,745 |
|
|
|
34,080 |
|
|
Expenses (excluding interest): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
63,537 |
|
|
|
26,126 |
|
Clearing, settlement and brokerage |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
Communications and data processing |
|
|
2,653 |
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
Occupancy and depreciation |
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
Selling |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
869 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,922 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
Total expenses (excluding interest) |
|
|
73,730 |
|
|
|
34,333 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
19,015 |
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
16,135 |
|
|
|
(1,016 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, (net
of taxes) (see Discontinued Operations
note) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
16,121 |
|
|
$ |
(1,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
11,504 |
|
|
$ |
3,176 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,422 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
7,082 |
|
|
$ |
2,167 |
|
|
38
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Net Revenue
Net revenue in the second quarter of 2009 was $92.7 million, an increase of $58.7 million, or 172
percent, compared to $34.1 million in the second quarter of 2008. Revenues from principal
transactions and commissions were $70.0 million in the second quarter of 2009, an increase of $48.1
million, or 220 percent compared to $21.8 million in the second quarter of 2008, due to increased
revenues in the Broadpoint Descap division of $23.3 million, the Debt Capital Markets division of
$22.2 million and the Equities division of $2.9 million. Investment Banking revenues of $13.0
million increased $3.8 million, or 40 percent, compared to $9.3 million in the second quarter of
2008, primarily due to an increase in advisory fees. Investment gains of $1.0 million increased
$0.8 million compared to $0.2 million in the second quarter of 2008 due to an increase in the value
of our investment in our FATV fund. Net interest income of $7.1 million increased by $4.9 million
over the second quarter of 2008, primarily due to coupon interest generated on higher inventory
levels at Broadpoint Descap and lower financing costs. Fees and other revenues of $1.7 million
increased by $1.1 million over the second quarter of 2008, primarily due to an increase in payments
received for equity research.
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits expense of $63.5 million in the second quarter of 2009, an increase of
$37.4 million, or 143 percent, compared to $26.1 million in the second quarter of 2008, primarily
due to an increase in net revenue of 172 percent. As part of the Companys compensation structure,
compensation levels vary with net revenues.
Non-Compensation Expense
Non-Compensation expenses of $10.2 million increased by $2.0 million, or 24 percent, compared to
$8.2 million in the second quarter of 2009. The increase in Clearing, settlement, and brokerage,
Communications and data processing, and Selling expenses was primarily driven by increased
headcount and activity in the Debt Capital Markets and Broadpoint Descap divisions. The remainder
of the increase was in Other expenses and was comprised of expenses associated with the acquisition
of Gleacher Partners and the amortization of intangibles related to the Broadpoint AmTech and
Gleacher Partners acquisitions. The Company completed its restructuring in the third quarter of
2008. There were no restructuring expenses in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the $0.9
million in restructuring expenses in the second quarter of 2008.
Income Taxes
The Company reported a tax expense of approximately $2.9 million and $0.8 million for the quarters
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Included in the tax provision for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 is an approximately $0.02 million increase in the gross amount of the
unrecognized tax benefits related to the current year that, if recognized in the future, would
affect the effective tax rate.
The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was 15.1 percent. This rate reflects a
$6.0 million non-cash income tax benefit related to the acquisition of Gleacher Partners. Excluding
this benefit, the effective tax rate would have been 46.7 percent.
The Company maintains a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset position. The
valuation allowance was recorded as a result of uncertainties as to the realization of the deferred
tax asset after weighing all positive and negative evidence, including the Companys history of
cumulative losses over at least the past three years and the difficulty of forecasting future
taxable income.
39
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Segment Highlights
For presentation purposes, net revenue within each of the businesses is classified as commissions
and principal transactions, investment banking, investment gains/(losses), net interest, and other.
Commissions and principal transactions include commissions on agency
trades and gains and losses
from sales and trading activities. Investment banking includes revenue generated from capital
raising through underwritings and private placements of equity and debt securities, and financial
advisory service fees in regards to mergers and acquisitions, restructuring and corporate finance
related matters. Investment gains/(losses) reflect gains and losses on the Companys investment
portfolio. Other revenue reflects management fees received from the partnerships the Company
manages and research fees. Net interest includes interest income net of interest expense and
reflects the effect of funding rates on the Companys inventory levels. Net revenue presented
within each category may differ from that presented in the financial statements as a result of
differences in categorizing revenue within each of the revenue line items listed below for purposes
of reviewing key business performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadpoint Descap |
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and Principal Transactions |
|
$ |
32,453 |
|
|
$ |
9,173 |
|
|
|
254 |
% |
Investment Banking |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
588 |
% |
Investment Gains/(Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Net Interest |
|
|
5,509 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
301 |
% |
Other |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(17 |
)% |
|
Total Net Revenue |
|
$ |
38,319 |
|
|
$ |
10,621 |
|
|
|
261 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Contribution |
|
$ |
14,974 |
|
|
$ |
4,411 |
|
|
|
239 |
% |
|
Broadpoint Descap Q2 2009 vs. Q2 2008
Broadpoint Descap net revenues of $38.3 million in the second quarter of 2009 increased $27.7
million, or 261 percent, compared to the second quarter of 2008. Commissions and principal
transactions revenue increased $23.3 million, or 254 percent, to $32.5 million due to increased
trading volumes and an overall widening of bid/ask spreads in their markets. Net interest
increased $4.1 million to $5.5 million due to higher inventory levels and higher coupon paying
securities in the portfolio partially offset by inter-company financing charges during the second
quarter of 2009 and decreased funding rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Capital Markets |
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and Principal Transactions |
|
$ |
33,149 |
|
|
$ |
10,935 |
|
|
|
203 |
% |
Investment Banking |
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
|
2,205 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Investment Gains/(Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Net Interest |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
(87 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Total Net Revenue |
|
$ |
36,054 |
|
|
$ |
13,920 |
|
|
|
159 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Contribution |
|
$ |
6,909 |
|
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
|
|
428 |
% |
|
Debt Capital Markets Q2 2009 vs. Q2 2008
Debt Capital Markets net revenues of $36.1 million in the second quarter of 2009 increased $22.1
million, or 159 percent, compared to $13.9 million in the second quarter of 2008. The $22.2
million increase in commissions and principal transactions revenue was due to widening spreads and
increased trading volume. Investment banking revenues increased due to advisory fees, which were
partially offset by a decrease in placement fees. Net interest decreased $0.7 million due to lower
inventory levels.
40
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Banking |
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and Principal Transactions |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Investment Banking |
|
|
9,648 |
|
|
|
6,604 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
Investment Gains/(Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Net Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Other |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Total Net Revenue |
|
$ |
9,659 |
|
|
$ |
6,635 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Contribution |
|
$ |
2,099 |
|
|
$ |
2,435 |
|
|
|
(14 |
)% |
|
Investment Banking Q2 2009 vs. Q2 2008
Investment Banking net revenue of $9.7 million increased $3.0 million, or 46 percent, in the second
quarter of 2009 compared to $6.6 million in the second quarter of 2008. The increase in investment
banking revenue was due to an increase in advisory fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities |
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and Principal Transactions |
|
$ |
4,441 |
|
|
$ |
1,501 |
|
|
|
196 |
% |
Investment Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Investment Gains/(Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Net Interest |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Other |
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
685 |
% |
|
Total Net Revenue |
|
$ |
5,758 |
|
|
$ |
2,094 |
|
|
|
175 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Contribution |
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
$ |
(2,162 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Equities Q2 2009 vs. Q2 2008
Equities net revenues of $5.8 million increased $3.7 million, or 175 percent, in the second quarter
of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008, due to the Companys acquisition of Broadpoint
AmTech in October 2008. Broadpoint AmTech replaced our legacy equity business that was unable to
generate sufficient revenues to operate profitably. Other revenues increased as a result of
payments received related to fee based research.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and Principal Transactions |
|
$ |
(86 |
) |
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Investment Banking |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Investment Gains/(Losses) |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
512 |
% |
Net Interest |
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
14,530 |
% |
Other |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
(23 |
)% |
|
Total Net Revenue |
|
$ |
2,955 |
|
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
|
265 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Contribution |
|
$ |
(5,264 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,246 |
) |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
Other Q2 2009 vs. Q2 2008
Other net revenue of $3.0 million increased $2.1 million, or 265 percent, in the second quarter of
2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008. Investment gains increased $0.8 million due to an
increase in the value of our investment in our FATV fund. The $1.5 million increase in net
interest revenues in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008 was
primarily due to an increase in inter-company financing of the activities of the other business
segments.
41
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Financial Overview
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Net revenues for the first six months of 2009 were $163.3 million, an increase of $111.9 million,
or 218 percent, from $51.4 million reported in the first six months of 2008. The Company reported
a net profit of $21.1 million or $0.27 per common share for the first six months of 2009 compared
to a net loss of $10.3 million or $0.16 loss per common share for the first six months of 2008.
Pre-tax income from continuing operations in the first six months of 2009 was $28.4 million
compared to a loss of $8.7 million in the prior year period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal transactions |
|
$ |
117,305 |
|
|
$ |
34,805 |
|
Commissions |
|
|
9,595 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
Investment banking |
|
|
12,459 |
|
|
|
3,824 |
|
Investment banking revenue from related
party |
|
|
5,767 |
|
|
|
6,130 |
|
Investment gains |
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
Interest |
|
|
22,152 |
|
|
|
7,851 |
|
Fees and other |
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
171,429 |
|
|
|
55,251 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
8,124 |
|
|
|
3,828 |
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
163,305 |
|
|
|
51,423 |
|
|
Expenses (excluding interest): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
115,944 |
|
|
|
43,279 |
|
Clearing, settlement and brokerage costs |
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
Communications and data processing |
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
3,899 |
|
Occupancy and depreciation |
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
3,106 |
|
Selling |
|
|
2,794 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,063 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,568 |
|
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
Total expenses (excluding interest) |
|
|
134,954 |
|
|
|
60,151 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
28,351 |
|
|
|
(8,728 |
) |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
7,237 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
Income (loss) income from continuing
operations |
|
|
21,114 |
|
|
|
(10,264 |
) |
Income (loss) income from discontinued
operations, (net of taxes) (see
Discontinued Operations note) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
21,142 |
|
|
$ |
(10,338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
22,152 |
|
|
$ |
7,851 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
8,124 |
|
|
|
3,828 |
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
14,028 |
|
|
$ |
4,023 |
|
|
42
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Net Revenue
Net revenue in the first six months of 2009 was $163.3 million, an increase of $111.9 million, or
218 percent, compared to $51.4 million in the first six months of 2008. Revenues from principal
transactions and commissions in the first six months of 2009 were $126.9 million, an increase of
$90.8 million, or 252 percent, compared to $36.1 million in the first six months of 2008, due to
increased revenues in the Broadpoint Descap division of $35.6 million, the Debt Capital Markets
division, which commenced operations in March 2008, of $49.4 million, and the Equities division of
$6.2 million. Investment Banking revenues of $18.2 million increased $8.3 million, or 83 percent,
compared to the $10.0 million in the first six months of 2008 due to an increase in advisory fees.
Net interest income of $14.0 million, increased by $10.0 million over the prior year period,
primarily due to coupon interest generated on higher inventory levels at Broadpoint Descap and
lower financing costs. Fees and other revenues of $3.2 million increased by $2.0 million over the
prior year period, primarily due to an increase in payments received for equity research.
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits expense of $115.9 million in the first six months of 2009, increased
$72.7 million, or 168 percent, compared to $43.3 million in the first six months of 2008, primarily
due to an increase in net revenue of 218 percent. As part of the Companys compensation structure,
compensation levels vary with net revenues.
Non-Compensation Expense
Non-Compensation expenses of $19.0 million increased by $2.1 million, or 13 percent, compared to
$16.9 million in the first six months of 2009. The increase in Clearing, settlement, and
brokerage, Communications and data processing, and Selling expenses was primarily due to the fact
that the Debt Capital Markets division had been operating for a full six months in the first six
months of 2009, the group commenced operations in March of 2008 and therefore did not have a full
six months activity for the same period in 2008. These expenses also increased, in part, due to
increased headcount and activity in the Debt Capital Markets and Broadpoint Descap divisions. The
remainder of the increase was in Other expense and was comprised of expenses associated with the
acquisition of Gleacher Partners and the amortization of intangibles related to the Broadpoint
AmTech and Gleacher Partners acquisitions. The Company completed its restructuring in the third
quarter of 2008. There were no restructuring expenses in the first six months of 2009 compared to
the $2.1 million in restructuring expenses in the first six months of 2008.
Income Taxes
The Company reported a tax expense of approximately $7.2 million and $1.5 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Included in the tax provision for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 is an approximately $0.04 million increase in the gross amount of
unrecognized tax benefits related to the current year that, if recognized in the future, would
affect the effective tax rate.
The
effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was
25.5 percent. This rate reflects
a $6.0 million non-cash income tax benefit related to the acquisition of Gleacher Partners.
Excluding this benefit, the effective tax rate would have been 46.7 percent.
The Company maintains a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset position. The
valuation allowance was recorded as a result of uncertainties as to the realization of the deferred
tax asset after weighing all positive and negative evidence, including the Companys history of
cumulative losses over at least the past three years and the difficulty of forecasting future
taxable income.
43
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Segment Highlights
For presentation purposes, net revenue within each of the businesses is classified as commissions
and principal transactions, investment banking, investment gains/(losses), net interest, and other.
Commissions and principal transactions include commissions on agency
trades and gains and losses
from sales and trading activities. Investment banking includes revenue generated from capital
raising transactions of equity and debt securities, fees for strategic advisory, fees for
restructuring and recapitalization services and valuations of structured products. Investment
gains/(losses) reflect gains and losses on the Companys investment portfolio. Other revenue
reflects management fees received from the partnerships the Company manages and research fees. Net
interest includes interest income net of interest expense and reflects the effect of funding rates
on the Companys inventory levels. Net revenue presented within each category may differ from that
presented in the financial statements as a result of differences in categorizing revenue within
each of the revenue line items listed below for purposes of reviewing key business performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadpoint Descap |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and Principal Transactions |
|
$ |
53,841 |
|
|
$ |
18,242 |
|
|
|
195 |
% |
Investment Banking |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
744 |
% |
Investment Gains/(Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Net Interest |
|
|
11,607 |
|
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
|
284 |
% |
Other |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(40 |
)% |
|
Total Net Revenue |
|
$ |
66,190 |
|
|
$ |
21,395 |
|
|
|
209 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Contribution |
|
$ |
27,964 |
|
|
$ |
9,003 |
|
|
|
211 |
% |
|
Broadpoint Descap YTD 2009 vs. YTD 2008
Broadpoint Descap net revenues of $66.2 million increased $44.8 million, or 209 percent, compared
to the first six months of 2008. Commissions and principal transactions revenue increased $35.6
million, or 195 percent, to $53.8 million due to increased trading volumes and an overall widening
of bid/ask spreads in their markets. Net interest increased $8.6 million to $11.6 million due to
higher inventory levels and higher coupon paying securities in the portfolio partially offset by
inter-company financing charges and decreased funding rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Capital Markets |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and Principal Transactions |
|
$ |
63,806 |
|
|
$ |
14,447 |
|
|
|
342 |
% |
Investment Banking |
|
|
4,671 |
|
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
98 |
% |
Investment Gains/(Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Net Interest |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
(71 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Total Net Revenue |
|
$ |
68,753 |
|
|
$ |
17,780 |
|
|
|
287 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Contribution |
|
$ |
11,703 |
|
|
$ |
1,635 |
|
|
|
616 |
% |
|
Debt Capital Markets YTD 2009 vs. YTD 2008
Debt Capital Markets net revenues of $68.8 million in the first six months of 2009 increased $51.0
million, or 287 percent, compared to $17.8 million in the first six months of 2008, which only
included four months of activity as the Debt Capital Market segment began to operate in March 2008.
The $49.4 million increase in commissions and principal transactions revenue was due to widening
bid/ask spreads and increased trading volume. Investment banking revenues increased $2.3 million
due to an increase in advisory fees. Net interest decreased $0.7 million due to lower inventory
levels.
44
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Banking |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and Principal Transactions |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Investment Banking |
|
|
12,588 |
|
|
|
7,070 |
|
|
|
78 |
% |
Investment Gains/(Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Net Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Other |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Total Net Revenue |
|
$ |
12,599 |
|
|
$ |
7,101 |
|
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Contribution |
|
$ |
2,075 |
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
|
341 |
% |
|
Investment Banking YTD 2009 vs. YTD 2008
Investment Banking net revenue of $12.6 million in the first six months of 2009 increased $5.5
million, or 77 percent, compared to $7.1 million in the first six months of 2008. The increase in
revenues is due to an increase in advisory fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and Principal Transactions |
|
$ |
9,281 |
|
|
$ |
3,128 |
|
|
|
197 |
% |
Investment Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Investment Gains/(Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Net Interest |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Other |
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
622 |
% |
|
Total Net Revenue |
|
$ |
11,865 |
|
|
$ |
3,918 |
|
|
|
203 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Contribution |
|
$ |
615 |
|
|
$ |
(4,746 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Equities YTD 2009 vs. YTD 2008
Equities net revenues of $11.9 million increased $7.9 million, or 203 percent, in the first six
months of 2009 compared to the first six months of 2008, due to the Companys acquisition of
Broadpoint AmTech in October 2008. Broadpoint AmTech replaced our legacy equity business that was
unable to generate sufficient revenues to operate profitably. Other revenues increased as a result
of payments received related to fee based research provided by Broadpoint AmTech.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions and Principal Transactions |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Investment Banking |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Investment Gains/(Losses) |
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
314 |
% |
Net Interest |
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
7,245 |
% |
Other |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
(25 |
)% |
|
Total Net Revenue |
|
$ |
3,898 |
|
|
$ |
1,229 |
|
|
|
217 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax Contribution |
|
$ |
(13,376 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,090 |
) |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
Other YTD 2009 vs. YTD 2008
Other net revenue of $3.9 million increased $2.7 million, or 217 percent, compared to $1.2 million
in the first six months of 2008. Investment Gains increased $0.7 million due to an increase in
the value of our investment in our
FATV fund. The $2.1 million increase in net interest was primarily due to inter-company financing
of the activities of the other business segments.
45
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2009, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $20.2 million, compared to $7.4
million at December 31, 2008. Subsequent to June 30, 2009, the Company received proceeds in the
amount of $82.7 million, prior to payment of certain expenses, related to the public offering
described below. This amount does not include the underwriters exercise of the over-allotment
option.
A substantial portion of the Companys assets are liquid, consisting of cash and assets that have
historically been readily convertible into cash such as our securities held in inventory. The
majority of these assets are financed by the Companys clearing agents. The majority of the
Companys securities positions in our trading accounts are readily marketable and actively traded.
The level of assets and liabilities will fluctuate as a result of the changes in the level of
positions held to facilitate customer transactions and changes in market conditions.
On March 4, 2008, the Company completed the sale of 11,579,592 shares of the Companys common stock
in a private placement for $19.7 million, or approximately $1.70 per share. In connection
therewith, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with MatlinPatterson, Mast, and
certain other investors, which required the Company to file a registration statement on Form S-3
for the resale of the shares purchased by the lead investor, Mast, which purchased 7.1 million of
the shares issued, on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act.
Such registration statement was filed and thereafter became effective on April 29, 2008.
On June 27, 2008, the Company entered into a Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement with Mast for the
issuance and sale of (i) 1,000,000 newly-issued unregistered shares of the Series B Preferred
Stock, and (ii) a warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise
price of $3.00 per share, for an aggregate cash purchase price of $25 million. The Preferred Stock
Purchase Agreement and the Series B Preferred Stock include, among other things, negative covenants
and other rights with respect to the operations, actions and financial condition of the Company and
its subsidiaries so long as the Series B Preferred Stock remains outstanding. Cash dividends of 10
percent per annum must be paid quarterly on the Series B Preferred Stock, while an additional
dividend of 4 percent per annum accrues and is cumulative, if not otherwise paid quarterly at the
option of the Company. The Series B Preferred Stock must be redeemed on or before June 27, 2012
(see Mandatory Redeemable Preferred Stock note of the condensed consolidated financial
statements).
On August 3, 2009, the Company completed the underwritten public offering of its common stock
consisting of 14,000,000 shares issued and sold by the Company and 9,500,000 shares sold by certain
of the Companys existing shareholders pursuant to an effective registration statement. The
proceeds to the Company from the offering, net of underwriting discounts and commissions, were
approximately $82.7 million before payment of expenses related to the underwriting. The Company
will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling shareholders. The
Company has granted to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 2,000,000
shares, and one of the selling shareholders has granted to the underwriters a 30-day option to
purchase up to an additional 1,525,000 shares, in each case to cover over-allotments, if any.
Regulatory
As of June 30, 2009, each of the Companys three registered broker-dealer subsidiaries, Broadpoint
Capital Inc., Broadpoint AmTech., and Gleacher Partners LLC were in compliance with the net
capital requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The net capital rules restrict the
amount of a broker-dealers net assets that may be distributed. Also, a significant operating loss
or extraordinary charge against net capital may
adversely affect the ability of the Companys broker-dealer subsidiaries to expand or even maintain
their present levels of business and the ability to support the obligations or requirements of the
Company. As of June 30, 2009, Broadpoint Capital had net capital
of $30.5 million, which exceeded
minimum net capital requirements by $30.2 million, Broadpoint AmTech had net capital of $1.7
million, which exceeded minimum net capital requirements by $1.4 million, and Gleacher Partners LLC
had net capital of $1.0 million which exceeded net capital requirements by $0.8 million.
46
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Derivatives
The Companys subsidiaries utilize various economic hedging strategies to actively manage their
market, credit and liquidity exposures. The subsidiaries also may purchase and sell securities on
a when-issued basis. At June 30, 2009, they had no outstanding underwriting commitments, had not
purchased or sold any securities on a when-issued basis, had not entered into any purchase
agreement on TBAs, and had entered into sale agreements on TBAs in the notional amount of $171.4
million.
Investments and Commitments
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had a commitment to invest up to an additional $1.0 million in the
Partnership. The investment period expired in July 2006; however, the general partner of the
Partnership, FATV GP LLC (the General Partner), may continue to make capital calls up through
July 2011 for additional investments in portfolio companies and for the payment of management fees.
The Company intends to fund this commitment from operating cash flow. The Partnerships primary
purpose is to provide investment returns consistent with risks of investing in venture capital.
The majority of the limited partners of the Partnership are non-affiliates of the Company.
The General Partner is responsible for the management of the Partnership, including among other
things, making investments for the Partnership. The members of the General Partner are George
McNamee, a former Director of the Company, Broadpoint Enterprise Funding, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company, and certain other employees of FATV. Subject to the terms of the
partnership agreement, under certain conditions, the General Partner is entitled to share in the
gains received by the Partnership in respect of its investment in a portfolio company.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had an additional commitment to invest up to $0.2 million in EIF.
The investment period expired in July 2006, but the General Partner may continue to make capital
calls up through July 2011 for additional investments in portfolio companies and for the payment of
management fees. The Company anticipates that this will be funded by the Company through operating
cash flow.
On April 30, 2008, the Company entered into a Transition Agreement (the Transition Agreement)
with FATV, FA Technology Holding, LLC and certain other employees of FATV, to effect a
restructuring of the investment management arrangements relating to the Partnership and the
formation of FA Technology Ventures III, L.P., a new venture capital fund (Fund III). Pursuant to
the Transition Agreement, among other things, the Company was to make a capital commitment of $10
million to Fund III and FATV was to cease advising the Partnership. The Transition Agreement
provided that if the initial closing of Fund III did not occur on or before March 31, 2009, the
Transition Agreement would automatically terminate. The initial closing of Fund III did not occur
on or before March 31, 2009, and the Transition Agreement terminated in accordance with its terms.
On June 5, 2009, the Company completed the Gleacher Transaction. Pursuant to the related Merger
Agreement, at the closing, the Company paid $10 million in cash and issued 22,401,712 of the 23
million shares of Company Common Stock as merger consideration for all the outstanding shares of
Gleacher Partners. Of these shares, 14,542,035 shares were issued to Eric J. Gleacher, the founder
and Chairman of Gleacher Partners. All of the shares issued as merger consideration are subject to
resale restrictions. The Company is obligated to pay the shareholders an additional $10 million in
cash after five years, subject to acceleration under certain circumstances.
Contingent Consideration
On October 2, 2008, the Company acquired 100 percent of the outstanding common shares of Broadpoint
AmTech. Per the stock purchase agreement, the sellers are entitled to receive future contingent
consideration consisting of approximately 100 percent of the profits earned by Broadpoint AmTech in
the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 and all of fiscal years 2009, 2010 and 2011, up to an
aggregate of $15 million in profits. The Sellers are also entitled to receive earn-out payments
consisting of 50 percent of such profits in excess of $15 million. All such earn-out payments will
be paid 50 percent in cash and, depending on the recipient thereof, either 50 percent in Company
common stock, subject to transfer restrictions lapsing ratably over
the three years following issuance, or 50 percent in restricted stock from the Incentive Plan, subject to vesting
based on continued employment with Broadpoint AmTech.
47
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Legal Proceedings
From time to time the Company and its subsidiaries are involved in legal proceedings or disputes.
(See Part I Item 3 Legal Proceedings). An adverse result or development in respect of these
matters, whether in settlement or as a result of litigation or arbitration, could materially
adversely affect the Companys condensed consolidated financial condition, results of operations,
cash flows and liquidity.
In addition, the securities industry is highly regulated. We are subject to both routine and
unscheduled regulatory examinations of our business and investigations of securities industry
practices by governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations. In recent years securities
firms have been subject to increased scrutiny and regulatory enforcement activity. Regulatory
investigations can result in substantial fines being imposed on us. Periodically we receive
inquiries and subpoenas from the SEC, state securities regulators and self-regulatory
organizations. We do not always know the purpose behind these communications or the status or
target of any related investigation. Our responses to these communications have in the past
resulted in our being cited for regulatory deficiencies, although to date these communications have
not had a material adverse effect on our business.
Intangible Assets
As of June 30, 2009, $105.0 million of goodwill and $22.4 million of amortizable customer
intangibles have been recorded on Broadpoint Gleacher Securities Group, Inc.s condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Intangible assets consist predominantly of customer related intangibles and goodwill related to the
acquisitions of Broadpoint Securities, Broadpoint AmTech, Gleacher Partners, and the Debt Capital
Markets Division. These intangible assets were allocated to the Companys Other business reporting
segment pursuant to SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill represents the
excess cost of a business acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. In accordance
with SFAS No. 142, indefinite-life intangible assets and goodwill are not amortized. The Company
reviews its goodwill on an annual basis in order to determine whether its value is impaired. In
addition to annual testing, goodwill is also tested for impairment at the time of a triggering
event requiring re-evaluation, if one were to occur. Goodwill is impaired when the carrying amount
of the reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the reporting unit. When available, the
Company uses recent, comparable transactions to estimate the fair value of the respective reporting
units. The Company calculates an estimated fair value based on multiples of revenues, earnings and
book value of comparable transactions. However, when such comparable transactions are not available
or have become outdated, the Company uses Income and Market approaches to determine fair value of
the reporting unit. The Income approach applies a discounted cash flow analysis based on
managements projections, while the Market approach analyzes and compares the operating performance
and financial condition of the reporting unit with those of a group of selected publicly-traded
companies that can be used for comparison. However, changes in current circumstances or business
conditions could result in an impairment of goodwill. As required the Company will continue to
perform impairment and goodwill testing on an annual basis or when an event occurs or circumstances
change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying
amount. In 2008, as a result of the annual impairment testing, the goodwill related to the
acquisition of Broadpoint Securities was determined not to be impaired. The Company did not
perform any impairment testing during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate is impacted by a variety of factors including fluctuations in
projected earnings, changes in the statutory tax rates to which the Companys operations are
subject, settlements or changes to FIN 48 uncertain tax positions and changes in the Companys
valuation allowance.
At June 30, 2009, the Company had a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. The
valuation allowance was established as a result of weighing all positive and negative evidence,
including the Companys history of cumulative losses over at least the past three years and the
difficulty of forecasting future taxable income.
48
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Currently, the Company is reporting income from continuing operations. To the extent the Company
can demonstrate it will have sustained earnings in future periods, this could be considered
positive evidence that a valuation allowance is unnecessary in part or whole. The release of the
Companys valuation allowance would result in a material impact on the Companys effective tax
rate.
Any
valuation allowance reduction will not affect the amount of cash paid
for income taxes. Because we expect our recorded tax rate to increase
in subsequent periods following a significant reduction of the
valuation allowance, our net income will be negatively affected in
periods following the reduction.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGMENTS
Information concerning the Companys off balance sheet arrangements are included in the Contractual
Obligations section which follows, except as set forth in the Derivative Financial Instruments
note to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table sets forth these contractual obligations by fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All |
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
Total |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Others |
|
Operating leases (net of
sublease rental
income)(1) |
|
$ |
53,763 |
|
|
$ |
3,455 |
|
|
$ |
5,749 |
|
|
$ |
5,032 |
|
|
$ |
4,990 |
|
|
$ |
4,950 |
|
|
$ |
29,587 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Partnership and employee
investment funds
commitments (2) |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mandatory Redeemable
Preferred Stock (3) |
|
|
35,630 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
29,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt (4) |
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
|
|
Merger Agreement
commitment(5) |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities from
unrecognized tax
benefits (6) |
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,575 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
105,365 |
|
|
$ |
5,905 |
|
|
$ |
8,536 |
|
|
$ |
7,640 |
|
|
$ |
34,577 |
|
|
$ |
5,135 |
|
|
$ |
39,997 |
|
|
$ |
3,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys headquarters and sales offices, and certain office and communication equipment,
are leased under non-cancelable operating leases, certain of which contain escalation clauses
and which expire at various times through 2021 (see Commitment and Contingencies note to the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements). |
|
(2) |
|
The Company has a commitment to invest in FA Technology Ventures L.P. (the Partnership) and
an additional commitment to invest in funds that invest in parallel with the Partnership (see
Commitment and Contingencies note to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements). |
|
(3) |
|
In connection with the Series B Preferred Stock effective June 27, 2008, the holders of
Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cash dividend of 10 percent per annum,
payable quarterly, as well as dividends at rate of 4 percent per annum which accrue and are
cumulative, if not otherwise paid quarterly at the option of the Company. The Company is
required to redeem all of the Series B Preferred Stock on or before June 27, 2012 at the
Redemption Price (see Mandatory Redeemable Preferred Stock note to the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements). |
|
(4) |
|
A select group of management and highly compensated employees are eligible to participate in
the Key Employees Plan. The employees enter into subordinate loans with the Company to
provide for the deferral of compensation and employer allocations under the Key Employee Plan.
The accounts of the participants of the Key Employees Plan are credited with earnings and/or
losses based on the performance of various investment benchmarks selected by the participants.
Maturities of the subordinated debt are based on the distribution election made by each
participant, which may be deferred to a later date by the participant. As of February 28,
2007, the Company no longer permits any new amounts to be deferred under the Key Employees
Plan. |
49
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(5) |
|
In connection with the acquisition of Gleacher Partners Inc., the Company has agreed to pay
$10 million to the Selling Parties five years after closing the Transaction, subject to
acceleration under certain circumstances (see Commitment and Contingencies note to the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements). |
|
(6) |
|
At June 30, 2009, the Company had a reserve for unrecognized tax benefits including related
interest of $3.6 million. The Company is unable at this time to estimate the periods in which
potential cash outflows relating to these liabilities would occur because the timing of the
cash flows are dependent upon audit by the relevant taxing authorities. The Company presently
has an ongoing audit with the State of New York. Management does not expect any significant
change in unrecognized tax benefits in the next twelve months. |
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)).
Under SFAS 141(R), an entity is required to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed,
contractual contingencies and contingent consideration measured at their fair value at the
acquisition date for any business combination consummated after the effective date. It further
requires that acquisition-related costs are to be recognized separately from the acquisition and
expensed as incurred. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. Accordingly, the Company applied the provisions of FASB 141(R)
to business combinations occurring after January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 141(R) resulted in
approximately $0.44 million of certain acquisition related costs that were not otherwise
capitalized in 2009, but were recognized separately and expensed as incurred.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 requires an entity to clearly
identify and present ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the entity in
the consolidated financial statements within the equity section but separate from the entitys
equity. It also requires the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to
the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated
statement of earnings; changes in ownership interest be accounted for similarly, as equity
transactions; and when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity
investment in the former subsidiary and the gain or loss on the deconsolidation of the subsidiary
be measured at fair value. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008 and shall be applied prospectively, except for the
presentation and disclosure requirements, which shall be applied retrospectively for all periods.
The adoption of SFAS 160 did not have a material effect on the Companys condensed consolidated
financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of SFAS 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and requires qualitative
disclosures about objectives and
strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair values and amounts of gains
and losses on derivative contracts and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in
derivative agreements. SFAS 161 is effective for the fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 161 did not have a material impact on the Companys
condensed consolidated financial statements.
In April of 2008, the FASB issued FSP 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 is intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of
a recognized intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value
of the asset. The effective date for FSP 142-3 is for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. The adoption of FSP 142-3 did not impact the Companys condensed financial statements.
In June 2008, FASB issued EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (EITF 03-6-1). EITF 03-6-1 applies to the
calculation of earnings per share under SFAS No. 128 Earnings Per Share for share-based payment
awards with rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. Unvested share-based payment awards that
contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are
participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to
the two-class method. The effective date for EITF 03-6-1 is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. EITF 03-6-1 was not applicable to the Company for
the period ended June 30, 2009.
50
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued FAP No 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset
When the Market for that Asset is Not Active (FSP 157-3). FSP 157-3 clarifies how SFAS 157, Fair
Value Measurements, should be applied when valuing securities in markets that are not active. The
adoption of FSP 157-3, effective September 30, 2008, did not have a material impact on the
Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, Disclosures by Public Entities
(Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities
(FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8). FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 require public entities to provide
additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets and require public enterprises to
provide additional disclosures about their involvement with variable interest entities. FSP FAS
140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 were adopted for the Companys year end consolidated financial statements as
of December 31, 2008 and did not affect the Companys condensed statement of financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows as they require only additional disclosures.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2). Under FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS
124-2, only the portion of an other-than-temporary impairment on a debt security related to credit
loss is recognized in current period earnings, with the remainder recognized in other comprehensive
income, if the holder does not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that the
holder will not be required to sell the security prior to recovery. Currently, the entire
other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in current period earnings. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS
124-2 is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP No. FAS 115-2 and
FAS 124-2 did not have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 require
that the fair value disclosures prescribed by SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments be included in financial statements prepared for interim periods. FSP FAS
107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted the
interim disclosure about fair value of financial instruments during the second quarter 2009 and it
did not have a material effect on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level
of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions
That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4). FSP FAS 157-4 provides guidance for estimating fair value
when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have decreased significantly.
Specifically, FSP No FAS 157-4 lists factors which should be evaluated to determine whether a
transaction is orderly, clarifies that adjustments to transactions or quoted prices may be
necessary when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have decreased
significantly, and provides guidance for determining the concurrent weighting of the transaction
price relative to fair value indications from other valuation techniques when estimating fair
value. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 during the second quarter did not have a material impact on
the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS 165). SFAS 165 establishes
general standards of accounting and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date
but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The standard, which
includes a new required disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent
events, is effective for interim or annual periods ending June 15, 2009.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
amendment of FASB No. 140 (SFAS 166). SFAS 166 improves financial reporting by eliminating the
exceptions for qualifying special-purpose entities from the
consolidation guidance and the exception
that permitted sale accounting
for certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not
surrendered control over
the transferred financial assets. SFAS 166 modifies the financial-components approach used in SFAS
140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,
and limits the circumstances in which a financial asset, or portion of a financial asset, should be
derecognized when the transferor has not transferred the entire original financial asset to an
entity that is not consolidated with the transferor in the financial statements being presented
and/or when the transferor has continuing involvement with the transferred financial asset. SFAS
166 also requires that a transferor recognize and initially measure at fair value all assets
obtained and liabilities incurred as a result of a transfer of financial assets accounted for as a
sale. SFAS 166 is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting
period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within the first annual reporting
period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The Company is currently
assessing the impact of SFAS 167 on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
51
BROADPOINT GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
In June 2009, The FASB issued SFAS 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities (SFAS 167). SFAS 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) to
require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise variable interest
or interest give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This analysis
identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the enterprise that has the
power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could
potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from
the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. Additionally,
SFAS 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) to require ongoing reassessments of whether an
enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 also amends
certain guidance in FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) for determining whether an entity is a variable
interest entity and to add an additional reconsideration event for determining whether an entity is
a variable interest entity when any changes in facts and circumstances occur such that the holders
of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights
of those investments to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance. SFAS 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) to require enhanced
disclosures and more transparent information about an enterprise s involvement in a variable
interest entity. SFAS 167 is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual
reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within the first annual
reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting
periods thereafter. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 167 on the Companys
condensed consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(Codification) and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of
SFAS No 162. The Codification will become the source of authoritative United States generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernment
entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under
authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.
The Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All
other nongrandfathered non-SEC accounting literature that are included in the Codification will become
nonauthoritative. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and
annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company is currently assessing the impact of
SFAS 168 on the Companys condensed consolidated statement of financial condition and results of
operations.
52
BROADPOINT
GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
(Unaudited)
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
MARKET RISK
Market risk generally represents the risk of loss that may result from the potential change in the
value of a financial instrument as a result of fluctuations in interest rates and equity prices,
changes in the implied volatility of interest rates and equity prices and also changes in the
credit ratings of either the issuer or its related country of origin. Market risk is inherent to
both derivative and non-derivative financial instruments, and accordingly, the scope of the
Companys market risk management procedures extends beyond derivatives to include all
market-risk-sensitive financial instruments. The Companys exposure to market risk is directly
related to trades executed on behalf of clients and from principal transactions executed to facilitate trades for clients.
The Company trades U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds; U.S. Government agency notes and bonds;
mortgage-backed securities, and corporate obligations. In connection with these activities, the
Company may be required to maintain inventories in order to facilitate customer transactions. In
connection with some of these activities, the Company attempts to mitigate its exposure to such
market risk by entering into economic hedging transactions, which may include U.S. Government, and
federal agency securities and TBAs.
The following table categorizes the Companys market risk sensitive financial instruments by type
of security and maturity date, if applicable (equity securities and other investments with no
maturity are being shown in the table under 2009). The fair value of securities shown is net of
long and short positions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair value of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
13,607 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
2,348 |
|
|
$ |
32,027 |
|
|
$ |
48,191 |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
US Government and federal agency
obligations |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
(6,260 |
) |
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
(655 |
) |
|
|
608,842 |
|
|
|
604,707 |
|
|
Subtotal interest rate sensitive
financial instruments |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
13,889 |
|
|
|
(6,260 |
) |
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
640,874 |
|
|
|
652,904 |
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426 |
|
Investments (1) |
|
|
15,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,615 |
|
Other |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Fair value of securities |
|
$ |
16,130 |
|
|
$ |
13,889 |
|
|
$ |
(6,260 |
) |
|
$ |
2,680 |
|
|
$ |
1,693 |
|
|
$ |
640,874 |
|
|
$ |
669,006 |
|
|
Notional amount of derivatives (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(171,356 |
) |
|
|
(171,356 |
) |
|
Fair value of interest rate
sensitive financial instruments
and notional amount of
derivatives |
|
$ |
16,130 |
|
|
$ |
13,889 |
|
|
$ |
(6,260 |
) |
|
$ |
2,680 |
|
|
$ |
1,693 |
|
|
$ |
469,518 |
|
|
$ |
497,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Investments exclude the consolidation of the Employee Investment Fund in the amount of
$1.1 million (see Investments note to the condensed consolidated financial statements). |
|
(2) |
|
TBA contracts have a maturity of two to three months. The underlying mortgage pools
maturity is shown in the table. |
The following is a discussion of the Companys primary market risk exposures as of June 30, 2009,
including a discussion of how those exposures are currently managed.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is a consequence of maintaining inventory positions and trading in
interest-rate-sensitive financial instruments. These financial instruments include corporate debt
securities, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, government securities and government
agency securities. In connection with trading activities, the Company exposes itself to interest
rate risk, arising from changes in the level or volatility of interest rates or the shape and slope
of the yield curve. The Companys fixed income activities also expose it to the risk of loss
related to changes in credit spreads. The Companys exposure to residential mortgage-backed agency
securities is reduced through the forward sale of such TBA contracts and government securities as
represented by the notional amount of derivatives.
53
BROADPOINT
GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
(Unaudited)
A sensitivity analysis has been prepared to estimate the Companys exposure to interest rate risk
of its net inventory positions. The fair market value of these securities included in the
Companys inventory at June 30, 2009 was $652.9 million and $190.4 million at June 30, 2008.
Interest rate risk is estimated as the potential loss in fair value resulting from a hypothetical
one-half percent increase in interest rates. At June 30, 2009, the potential change in fair value
using a yield to maturity calculation and assuming this hypothetical change was $36.5 million and
at June 30, 2008, it was $9.0 million. The actual risks and results of such adverse effects may
differ substantially.
Equity Price Risk
The Company does not currently make markets in equity securities, but is exposed to equity price
risk to the extent it holds equity securities in inventory. Equity price risk results from changes
in the level or volatility of equity prices, which affect the value of equity securities or
instruments that derive their value from a particular stock. The Company attempts to reduce the
risk of loss inherent in its inventory of equity securities by monitoring those security positions
throughout each day.
Marketable equity securities included in the Companys inventory, which were recorded at a fair
value of $0.4 million in securities owned at June 30, 2009 and $1.4 million in securities owned at
June 30, 2008, have exposure to equity price risk. This risk is estimated as the potential loss in
fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10 percent adverse change in prices quoted by stock
exchanges and amounts to $0.04 million at June 30, 2009 and $0.1 million at June 30, 2008. The
Companys investment portfolio excluding the consolidation of the Employee Investment Fund at June
30, 2009 and 2008 had a fair market value of $15.6 million and $14.3 million, respectively. Equity
price risk is also estimated as the potential loss in fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10
percent adverse change in equity security prices or valuations and for the Companys investment
portfolio excluding the consolidation of the Employee Investment Funds amounted to $1.6 million at
June 30, 2009 and $1.4 million at June 30, 2008. There can be no assurance that the Companys
actual losses due to its equity price risk will not exceed the amounts indicated above. The actual
risks and results of such adverse effects may differ substantially.
Prepayment Risk
Prepayment risk, which is related to the interest rate risk, arises from the possibility that the
rate of principal repayment on mortgages will fluctuate, affecting the value of mortgage-backed
securities. Prepayments are the full or partial repayment of principal prior to the original term
to maturity of a mortgage loan and typically occur due to refinancing of mortgage loans. Prepayment
rates on mortgage-related securities vary from time to time and may cause changes in the amount of
the Companys net interest income and the effectiveness of TBA economic hedging. Prepayments of
adjustable-rate mortgage loans usually can be expected to increase when mortgage interest rates
fall below the then-current interest rates on such loans and decrease when mortgage interest rates
exceed the then-current interest rate on such loans, although such effects are not predictable.
Prepayment experience also may be affected by the conditions in the housing and financial markets,
general economic conditions and the relative interest rates on fixed-rate and adjustable-rate
mortgage loans underlying mortgage-backed securities. The purchase prices of mortgage-backed
securities are generally based upon assumptions regarding the expected amounts and rates of
prepayments.
CREDIT RISK
The Company is engaged in various trading and brokerage activities whose counterparties primarily
include broker-dealers, banks, and other financial institutions. In the event counterparties do
not fulfill their obligations, the Company may be exposed to risk. The risk of default depends on
the credit worthiness of the counter party or issuer of the instrument. The Company seeks to
control credit risk by following an established credit approval process, monitoring credit limits,
and requiring collateral where it deems appropriate.
The Company purchases debt securities and may have significant positions in its inventory subject
to market and credit risk. In order to control these risks, security positions are monitored on a
daily basis. Should the Company find it necessary to sell such a security, it may not be able to realize the full carrying
value of the security due to the size of the position sold or market conditions.
54
BROADPOINT
GLEACHER SECURITIES GROUP, INC.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
(Unaudited)
Agency and principal securities transactions with customers of the Companys subsidiaries are
cleared through third party clearing agreements on a fully disclosed basis. Under these
agreements, the clearing agents settle these transactions on a fully disclosed basis, collect
margin receivables related to these transactions, monitor the credit standing and required margin
levels related to these customers and, pursuant to margin guidelines, require the customer to
deposit additional collateral with them or to reduce positions, if necessary.
In the normal course of business the Company guarantees certain service providers, such as clearing
and custody agents, trustees, and administrators, against specified potential losses in connection
with their acting as an agent of, or providing services to, the Company or its affiliates. The
maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company could be required to make under these
indemnifications cannot be estimated. However, the Company believes that it is unlikely it will
have to make material payments under these arrangements and has not recorded any contingent
liability in the condensed consolidated financial statements for these indemnifications.
OPERATING RISK
Operating risk is the potential for loss arising from limitations in the Companys financial
systems and controls, deficiencies in legal documentation and the execution of legal and fiduciary
responsibilities, deficiencies in technology and the risk of loss attributable to operational
problems. These risks are less direct than credit and market risk, but managing them is critical,
particularly in a rapidly changing environment with increasing transaction volumes. In order to
reduce or mitigate these risks, the Company has established and maintains an internal control
environment that incorporates various control mechanisms at different levels throughout the
organization and within such departments as Finance, Information Technology, Operations, Legal,
Compliance and Internal Audit. These control mechanisms attempt to ensure that operational
policies and procedures are being followed and that the Companys various businesses are operating
within established corporate policies and limits.
OTHER RISKS
Other risks encountered by the Company include political, regulatory and tax risks. These risks
reflect the potential impact that changes in local laws, regulatory requirements or tax statutes
have on the economics and viability of current or future transactions. In an effort to mitigate
these risks, the Company seeks to review new and pending regulations and legislation and their
potential impact on its business.
55
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys management, with the
participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Companys
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer, concluded
that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period
covered by this report. In addition, no changes in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
We have excluded from our assessment of internal controls, the controls and procedures
acquired as a result of the Gleacher Transaction. These controls are not
required to be included in managements evaluation of internal controls as of June 30, 2009, since
the transaction took place on June 5, 2009. Gleacher Partners
LLC is a consolidated subsidiary of Broadpoint Gleacher Securities Group, Inc.
whose total assets and net revenues comprise less than 0.5 percent of the
related consolidated statement amounts as of and for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009.
56
Part II-Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In 1998, the Company was named in lawsuits by Lawrence Group, Inc. and certain related entities
(the Lawrence Parties) in connection with a private sale of Mechanical Technology Inc. stock from
the Lawrence Parties that was approved by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of New York (the Bankruptcy Court). The Company acted as placement agent in that sale,
and a number of persons who were employees and officers of the Company at that time, who have also
been named as defendants, purchased shares in the sale. The complaints alleged that the defendants
did not disclose certain information to the sellers and that the price approved by the court was
therefore not proper. The cases were initially filed in the Bankruptcy Court and the United States
District Court for the Northern District of New York (the District Court), and were subsequently
consolidated in the District Court. The District Court dismissed the cases, and that decision was
subsequently vacated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which remanded
the cases for consideration of the plaintiffs claims as motions to modify the Bankruptcy Court
sale order. The plaintiffs claims were referred back to the Bankruptcy Court for such
consideration. In February 2009, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed the motions in their entirety.
Plaintiffs have filed a notice of appeal, which would be heard by the District Court. The Company
believes that it has strong defenses and intends to vigorously defend itself against the
plaintiffs claims, and believes the claims lack merit. However, an unfavorable resolution could
have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations and cash
flows in the period which resolved. The appeal has been stayed pending settlement discussions.
Due to the nature of the Companys business, the Company and its subsidiaries are now, and likely
in the future will be, involved in a variety of legal proceedings, including the matters described
above. These include litigation, arbitrations and other proceedings initiated by private parties
and arising from our underwriting, financial advisory or other transactional activities, client
account activities and employment matters. Third parties who assert claims may do so for monetary
damages that are substantial, particularly relative to the Companys financial position. In
addition, the securities industry is highly regulated. The Company and its subsidiaries are
subject to both routine and unscheduled regulatory examinations of its business and investigations
of securities industry practices by governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations. In
recent years securities firms have been subject to increased scrutiny and regulatory enforcement
activity. Regulatory investigations can result in substantial fines being imposed on the Company
and/or its subsidiaries. Periodically the Company and its subsidiaries receive inquiries and
subpoenas from the SEC, state securities regulators and self-regulatory organizations. The Company
does not always know the purpose behind these communications or the status or target of any related
investigation. The responses to these communications have in the past resulted in the Company
and/or its subsidiaries being cited for regulatory deficiencies, although to date these
communications have not had a material adverse effect on the Companys business.
The Company has taken reserves in its financial statements with respect to legal proceedings to the
extent it believes appropriate. However, accurately predicting the timing and outcome of legal
proceedings, including the amounts of any settlements, judgments or fines, is inherently difficult
insofar as it depends on obtaining all of the relevant facts (which is sometimes not feasible) and
applying to them often-complex legal principles. Based on currently available information, the
Company does not believe that any litigation, proceeding or other matter to which it is a party or
otherwise involved will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of
operations and cash flows, although an adverse development, or an increase in associated legal
fees, could be material in a particular period, depending in part on the Companys operating
results in that period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our business and operations entail a variety of serious risks and uncertainties. You should
carefully consider the risk factors described below and in our other public reports. If any of the
following risks actually occur, our financial condition or results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected. These risk factors are intended to highlight factors that may
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and are not meant to be an
exhaustive discussion. Additional risks and uncertainties of which we are currently unaware or that
we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect us.
57
Company Risks
Difficult market conditions have adversely affected and may continue to adversely affect our
business in many ways. Our businesses are materially affected by conditions in the financial
markets and economic conditions generally, both in the U.S. and elsewhere around the world.
Difficult market and economic conditions and geopolitical uncertainties have in the past adversely
affected and may in the future adversely affect our business and profitability in many ways. These
conditions have materially and adversely changed over the prior twelve to eighteen months in
unprecedented ways, characterized by substantial funding and liquidity pressures, substantial
volatility, decreased values in nearly all asset classes, and a significant reduction in business,
consumer and investor confidence. The U.S. and global economies have entered a deep recession. Many
companies in a broad range of industries are in serious financial jeopardy due to decreased
consumer spending, business activity and liquidity in the credit markets. These conditions have
also changed the broader landscape of the financial services industry, causing several
industry-leading institutions to fail or merge their businesses.
Despite the various initiatives and actions that the U.S. and other governments and banks have
implemented since the financial deterioration began, asset values and consumer and investor
confidence are still low and the liquidity crisis remains. These and other conditions could limit
our access to funding as well as increase our cost of funding, and could limit our ability to
engage in certain activities. These effects likely will continue until market conditions
substantially improve.
Weakness in the equity and fixed income markets and diminished trading volume of securities could
adversely impact our sales and trading business. As liquidity in the trading markets for debt
securities has diminished, spreads, or the difference between the bid and ask prices for a
security, have widened, creating the opportunity for higher margins per trade. This widening of
spreads has been one source of revenue growth for us, and if spreads narrow, our revenues could be
adversely affected. In addition, continued industry-wide declines in the size and number of
underwritings and mergers and acquisitions also would likely have an adverse effect on our
revenues, our growth and prospects. In addition, reductions in the trading prices for equity
securities also tend to reduce the dollar value of investment banking transactions, such as
underwriting and mergers and acquisitions transactions, which in turn may reduce the fees we earn
from these transactions. Our revenues would likely decline in those circumstances and, if we were
unable to reduce expenses at the same pace, our profit margin would erode. In addition, in the
event of extreme market events, such as a recurrence of the global credit crisis, we could incur
substantial risk of loss due to market volatility.
Our business is also significantly affected by interest rates, which can change suddenly and
unexpectedly. For example, a significant increase in interest rates would result in a decrease in
the level of customer activity, increase our cost of funding, likely would decrease new issues in
the debt capital markets and create a business environment in which M&A activity decreases. Any of
these results would increase our costs or decrease our revenues.
We have incurred losses in recent periods and may incur losses in the future. We have incurred
losses in recent periods. We recorded a net loss of $17.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2008, a net loss of $19.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and a net loss of $44.0
million for the year ended December 31, 2006. In recent years, we have experienced declines in
revenues generated by certain of our key segments, including Equities and Other. We may incur
losses and further declines in revenue in future periods. While we recorded net income for each of
our last three fiscal quarters, we may not be able to maintain profitability. If we incur
additional losses and are unable to raise funds to finance those losses, our liquidity and ability
to operate would be adversely affected.
Our recent improvements in financial results may not be representative of future results. We have
engaged in a restructuring of our business over the last eighteen months. In the past three fiscal
quarters, we have experienced significant improvements in our operating results. These
improvements, we believe, have resulted from a combination of our restructuring efforts and market
conditions favorable to our realigned business operations. We may not be able to maintain these
profitable results, either because we fail to adequately capitalize on market conditions or because
market conditions become adverse to our business model.
We may be unable to fully capture the expected value from acquisitions and investments and
personnel. We currently expect to grow through acquisitions and through strategic investments, as
well as through internal expansion. To the extent we make acquisitions or enter into combinations,
we face numerous risks and uncertainties combining or integrating the relevant businesses and
systems, including the need to combine accounting and data processing systems and management controls and to integrate relationships with
clients and business partners.
In addition, acquisitions may involve the issuance of additional
shares of our common stock, which may dilute our shareholders ownership of our firm, or the use of
cash or borrowing capacity, which may impact our funding and liquidity following the acquisition.
Furthermore, acquisitions could entail a number of risks, including problems with the effective
integration of operations, inability to maintain key pre-acquisition business relationships,
increased operating costs, exposure to unanticipated liabilities and difficulties in realizing
projected efficiencies, synergies and cost savings. For instance, we recently closed our
acquisition of Gleacher Partners, Inc., and we believe that the completion of this merger will
confer substantial benefits on us. However, Gleacher Partners has only been a part of our
organization for a short period of time and we may not obtain the anticipated benefits. We may not
be able to integrate successfully with Gleacher Partners, any of our other recent acquisitions or
any businesses we acquire in the future. Further, we may not be able to derive the benefits
anticipated from these acquisitions, including the growth opportunities anticipated to be derived
from the Gleacher Partners merger. If we are not able to integrate successfully our past and future
acquisitions, there is a risk that our results of operations may be materially and adversely
affected. Also, expansions or acquisitions divert our managements attention from our other
operations.
58
In connection with acquisitions, we have recorded a significant amount of goodwill and intangible
assets. At June 30, 2009, intangibles and goodwill represented $127.4 million. If the acquired
businesses do not perform as expected, we may need to record impairment charges against these
intangible assets, which would reduce net income, possibly materially.
Our ability to hire and retain our senior professionals is critical to the success of our business.
In order to operate our business successfully, we rely heavily on our senior professionals. Their
personal reputation, judgment, business generation capabilities and project execution skills are a
critical element in obtaining and executing client engagements. In particular, Eric J. Gleacher,
our Chairman of the Board of Directors, Lee Fensterstock, our Chief Executive Officer, and Peter J.
McNierney, our President and Chief Operating Officer, make important contributions to our business,
both as to management and business-generation. Also, like others in this industry, we have key
professionals responsible for a disproportionate portion of our clients and business. Any loss of
professionals, particularly key senior professionals or groups of related professionals, could
impair our ability to secure or successfully complete engagements, materially and adversely affect
our revenues and make it more difficult to operate profitably. We encounter intense competition for
qualified employees from other companies in the investment banking industry as well as from
businesses outside the investment banking industry, such as hedge funds, private equity funds and
venture capital funds. In the past, we have lost investment banking, brokerage, research, and
senior professionals. We could lose more in the future. In the future, we may need to hire
additional personnel. At that time, there could be a shortage of qualified personnel whom we could
hire. This could hinder our ability to expand or cause a backlog in our ability to conduct our
business, including the handling of investment banking transactions and the processing of brokerage
orders. These personnel challenges could harm our business, financial condition and operating
results.
Limitations on our access to capital could impair our liquidity and our ability to conduct our
businesses. Liquidity, or ready access to funds, is essential to financial services firms.
Failures of financial institutions have often been attributable in large part to insufficient
liquidity, such as that experienced recently and persisting in the U.S. and global economy.
Liquidity is of particular importance to our trading business, and perceived liquidity issues may
affect our clients and counterparties willingness to engage in brokerage transactions with us.
Our liquidity has been impaired by the current widening of credit spreads and significant decline
in availability of credit, and could be further impaired due to other circumstances that we may be
unable to control, such as a general market disruption, negative views about the financial services
industry generally or an operational problem that affects our trading clients, third parties or us.
We rely on cash and assets that have historically been readily convertible into cash, such as our
securities held in inventory, to finance our operations generally and to maintain our margin
requirements, particularly with our clearing firms, Ridge Clearing Outsource Solutions, Inc., JP
Morgan Clearing Corp., and Pershing LLC. Our ability to continue to access these and other forms of
capital could be impaired due to circumstances beyond our control, such as a dramatic change in the
value of our collateral, the willingness or ability of lenders to provide credit, and market
disruptions or dislocations, generally. Any such events could have a material adverse effect on our
ability to fund our operations and operate our business.
59
In order to obtain funding to grow our business or fund operations in the event of continuing
losses, we may seek to raise capital through the issuance and sale of our common stock or the
incurrence of debt. The sale of equity, or securities convertible into equity, would result in
dilution to our shareholders. The incurrence of debt may subject us to covenants restricting our
business activities. Additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.
Our venture capital business and investment portfolio may also create liquidity risk due to
increased levels of investments in high-risk, illiquid assets. We have made substantial principal
investments in our private equity funds and may make additional investments in future funds, which
are typically made in securities that are not publicly traded. At June 30, 2009, $16.7 million of
our total assets consisted of relatively illiquid private equity investments (see Investments
note of our consolidated financial statements). There is a risk that we may be unable to realize
our investment objectives by sale or other disposition at attractive prices or may otherwise be
unable to complete any exit strategy. In particular, these risks could arise from changes in the
financial condition or prospects of the portfolio companies in which investments are made, changes
in national or international economic conditions or changes in laws, regulations, fiscal policies
or political conditions of countries in which investments are made. It takes a substantial period
of time to identify attractive investment opportunities and then to realize the cash value of our
investments through resale. Even if a private equity investment proves to be profitable, it may be
several years or longer before any profits can be realized in cash.
Regulatory capital requirements may impede our ability to conduct our business. Broadpoint
Capital, Broadpoint AmTech and Gleacher Partners, our broker-dealer subsidiaries, are subject to
the net capital requirements of the SEC and various self-regulatory organizations of which they are
members. These requirements typically specify the minimum level of net capital a broker-dealer must
maintain. Any failure to comply with these net capital requirements could impair our ability to
conduct our core business as a brokerage firm.
Pricing and other competitive pressures may impair the revenues and profitability of our brokerage
business. In recent years, we have experienced significant pricing pressures on trading margins
and commissions in debt and equity trading. In the fixed income markets, regulatory requirements
have resulted in greater price transparency, leading to increased price competition and decreased
trading margins. In the equity markets, we have experienced increased pricing pressure from
institutional clients to reduce commissions, and this pressure has been augmented by the increased
use of electronic, algorithmic and direct market access trading, which has created additional
downward pressure on trading margins. The trend toward using alternative trading systems is
continuing to grow, which may result in decreased commission and trading revenue, reduce our
participation in the trading markets and our ability to access market information, and lead to the
creation of new and stronger competitors. As a result of pressure from institutional clients to
alter soft dollar practices and SEC rulemaking in the soft dollar area, some institutions are
entering into arrangements that separate (or unbundle) payments for research products or services
from sales commissions. These arrangements, both in the form of lower commission rates and
commission sharing agreements, have increased the competitive pressures on sales commissions and
have affected the value our clients place on high-quality research. Additional pressure on sales
and trading revenue may impair the profitability of our brokerage business. Moreover, our inability
to reach an agreement regarding the terms of unbundling arrangements with institutional clients who
are actively seeking such arrangements could result in the loss of those clients, which would
likely reduce our institutional commissions. We believe that pricing pressures in these and other
areas will continue as institutional investors continue to reduce the amounts they are willing to
pay, including reducing the number of brokerage firms they use, and some of our competitors seek to
obtain market share by reducing fees, commissions or margins. Additionally, in 2008 several
prominent financial institutions consolidated, merged or received substantial government
assistance. Such events could result in our competitors gaining greater capital and other
resources, or seeking to obtain market share by reducing fees, commissions or margins.
Certain of our businesses focus principally on specific sectors of the economy, and deterioration
in the business environment in these sectors generally or decline in the market for securities of
companies within these sectors could materially and adversely affect our business. For example,
our equities business focuses principally on the Technology, Aerospace, Defense and Clean Tech
sectors. Volatility in the business environment in these sectors, or in the market for securities
of companies within these sectors, could substantially affect our financial results and the market
value of our common stock. The market for securities in each of our target sectors may also be
subject to industry-specific risks. Underwriting transactions,
strategic advisory engagements and trading activities in our target sectors represent a significant portion
of our business.
This concentration exposes us to the risk of substantial declines in revenues in
the event of downturns in these sectors of the economy. Any future downturns in our target sectors
could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
60
We are a holding company and depend on payments from our subsidiaries. We depend on dividends,
distributions and other payments from our subsidiaries to fund our obligations. Regulatory and
other legal restrictions may limit our ability to transfer funds freely, either to or from our
subsidiaries. In particular, our broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to laws and regulations
that authorize regulatory bodies to block or reduce the flow of funds to the parent holding
company, or that prohibit such transfers altogether in certain circumstances. These laws and
regulations may hinder our ability to access funds that we may need to make payments on our
obligations. In addition, because our interests in the firms subsidiaries consist of equity
interests, our rights may be subordinated to the claims of the creditors of these subsidiaries.
Markets have and may continue to experience periods of high volatility. Financial markets are
susceptible to unanticipated, severe and rapid depreciation in asset values accompanied by a
reduction in asset liquidity, such as the asset price deterioration in the subprime residential
mortgage market. Higher interest rates during the first half of 2007 continuing through 2008,
falling property prices through this period and a significant increase in the number of subprime
mortgages originated in 2005 and 2006 contributed to dramatic increases in mortgage delinquencies
and defaults in 2007 and 2008 and led to delinquencies among higher-risk, or subprime, borrowers in
the United States. The widespread dispersion of credit risk related to mortgage delinquencies and
defaults, through the securitization of mortgage-backed securities, sales of collateralized debt
obligations and the creation of structured investment vehicles, and the broad range of unregulated
derivative products, caused banks to reduce their loans to each other or make them at higher
interest rates. During the second half of 2007 and 2008, the economic impact of these problems
spread and led to the most significant disruption of the financial markets since the Great
Depression, and ultimately what amounted to a complete shutdown of the credit markets.
Counterparties and other financial institutions failed in unprecedented fashion. It is impossible
to predict the long-term impact of this financial disruption, or whether it will persist or recur,
or to predict the extent to which our markets, products and businesses will be adversely affected.
As a result, these conditions could adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
Increase in capital commitments in our trading, underwriting and other businesses increases the
potential for significant losses. Until the onset of the recent financial disruption, the trend in
capital markets had been toward larger and more frequent commitments of capital by financial
services firms in many of their activities. For example, in order to win business, investment banks
increasingly committed to purchase large blocks of stock of publicly-traded issuers, instead of
employing the more traditional marketed underwriting process, in which marketing was typically
completed before an investment bank committed to purchase securities for resale. We believe that
the wide-spread capital impairment of investment banks resulting from the financial dislocations
experienced recently could reverse this trend. However, we cannot predict with certainty how the
industry will evolve or the extent to which investment banks will continue to use their own capital
as a competitive tool in winning business. As a result, we may be forced to commit greater amounts
of capital to facilitate primarily client-driven business.
Our principal trading and investments expose us to risk of loss. To facilitate client-trading
activities, we maintain securities trading positions in our DESCAP business. For example, if one of
our clients is seeking to acquire a significant position in a particular security, we may
accumulate a position in that security prior to selling it to the client. Conversely, we may
purchase a block of securities from a client before we have located purchasers for the entire
block. We seek to minimize market risk associated with these positions, by trading out of them as
quickly as possible and/or through hedging strategies. Certain positions, however, may be held by
us for longer periods of time while we are seeking buyers for those positions, thereby exposing us
to greater risk of loss.
We may incur significant losses from these positions due to market fluctuations and volatility. For
example, to the extent that we own securities, a downturn in the value of those securities would
result in losses from a decline in value. Conversely, to the extent that we have sold securities we
do not own, an upturn in value could expose us to potentially unlimited losses as we attempt to
acquire the securities in a rising market. In addition, we may engage in hedging transactions and
strategies that may not adequately mitigate losses in our principal positions. If the transactions
and strategies are not successful, we could suffer significant losses. Moreover,
taking such positions in times of significant volatility can lead to significant unrealized losses,
which further impact our ability to borrow to finance such activities.
The unprecedented volatility
of the markets recently for both fixed income and equity securities, in combination with the credit
crisis, caused several well established investment banks to fail or come close to failing. If these
conditions continue, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely
affected.
61
Our financial results may fluctuate substantially from period to period, which may impact our stock
price. We have experienced, and expect to experience in the future, significant periodic
variations in our revenues and results of operations. These variations may be attributed in part to
trading related losses and the fact that our investment banking revenues are typically earned upon
the successful completion of a transaction, the timing of which is uncertain and beyond our
control. As a result, our business is highly dependent on market conditions and the interest in the
market for the products and services we trade and offer, as well as the decisions and actions of
our clients and interested third parties. This risk may be intensified by focusing on companies in
specific industries or sectors. For example, our Broadpoint AmTech broker-dealer focuses on
companies in the Technology, Aerospace and Defense, and Clean Tech sectors. Concentrating in a
specific sector or industry exposes us to volatility in that area that may not affect the broader
markets. For more information, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations. In addition, our results of operations experience some seasonality, with
the third quarter typically being less robust than other quarters, most likely because of a general
business activity slow-down in July and August of each year.
We face strong competition from larger firms. The brokerage and investment banking industries are
intensely competitive, and we expect them to remain so. We compete on the basis of a number of
factors, including client relationships, reputation, the abilities of our professionals, market
focus and the relative quality and price of our services and products. We have experienced intense
price competition in some of our businesses, particularly discounts in large block trades and
trading commissions and spreads. In addition, pricing and other competitive pressures in investment
banking, including the trends toward multiple bookrunners, co-managers and multiple financial
advisors handling transactions, have continued and could adversely affect our revenues. We believe
we may experience competitive pressures in these and other areas in the future, as some of our
competitors seek to obtain market share by competing on the basis of price.
Many of our competitors in the brokerage and investment banking industries have a broader range of
products and services, greater financial and marketing resources, larger client bases, greater name
recognition, more professionals to serve their clients needs, greater global reach and more
established relationships with clients than we have. These larger and better-capitalized
competitors may be better able to respond to changes in the brokerage and investment banking
industries, to compete for skilled professionals, to finance acquisitions, to fund internal growth
and to compete for market share generally.
The scale of our competitors has increased in recent years as a result of substantial consolidation
among companies in the brokerage and investment banking industries. In addition, a number of large
commercial banks and other broad-based financial services firms have established or acquired
underwriting or financial advisory practices and broker-dealers or have merged with other financial
institutions. These firms have the ability to offer a wider range of products than we do, which may
enhance their competitive position. They also have the ability to support investment banking with
commercial banking, insurance and other financial services in an effort to gain market share, which
has resulted, and could further result, in pricing pressure in our businesses. For example, many of
our larger competitors have in the past provided bridge lending and equity participation and
otherwise committed their own capital to facilitate transactions. The ability to provide financing
had become, prior to the financial crisis, an important advantage for some of our larger
competitors, and if this trend continues it would adversely affect us competitively because we do
not provide such financing. Additionally, these broader, more robust investment banking and
financial services platforms may be more appealing to investment banking professionals than our
business, making it more difficult for us to attract new employees and retain those we have.
If we are unable to compete effectively in our markets, our business, financial condition and
results of operations will be adversely affected.
Our risk management policies and procedures may leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated
risk. Our risk management strategies and techniques may not be fully effective in mitigating our
risk exposure in all market environments or against all types of risk.
62
Our risk hedging strategies also expose us to the risk that counterparties that owe us money,
securities or other assets will not perform on their obligations. These counterparties may default
on their obligations to us due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failure, breach of
contract or other reasons. In 2008, an unprecedented number of counterparties defaulted on
obligations in the financial services community, although we suffered no losses from counterparty
defaults. We are also subject to the risk that our rights against third parties may not be
enforceable in all circumstances. Although we regularly review credit exposures to specific clients
and counterparties and to specific industries and regions that we believe may present credit
concerns, default risk may arise from events or circumstances that are difficult to detect or
foresee. In addition, concerns about, or a default by, one institution could lead to significant
liquidity problems, losses or defaults by other institutions, which in turn could adversely affect
us. If any of the variety of instruments, processes and strategies we utilize to manage our
exposure to various types of risk are not effective, we may incur losses.
Our operations and infrastructure may malfunction or fail. Our businesses are highly dependent on
our ability to process, on a daily basis, a large number of transactions across diverse markets,
and the transactions we process have become increasingly complex. Our financial, accounting or
other data processing systems may fail to operate properly or become disabled as a result of events
that are wholly or partially beyond our control, including a disruption of electrical or
communications services or our inability to occupy one or more of our buildings. The inability of
our systems to accommodate an increasing volume of transactions could also constrain our ability to
expand our businesses. If any of these systems do not operate properly or are disabled or if there
are other shortcomings or failures in our internal processes, people or systems, we could suffer
impairment to our liquidity, financial loss, a disruption of our businesses, liability to clients,
regulatory intervention or reputational damage.
We also face the risk of operational failure or termination of any of the clearing agents,
exchanges, clearing houses or other financial intermediaries we use to facilitate our securities
transactions. Any such failure or termination could adversely affect our ability to execute
transactions and to manage our exposure to risk.
In addition, our ability to conduct business may be adversely impacted by a disruption in the
infrastructure that supports our businesses and the communities in which we are located. This may
include a disruption involving electrical, communications, transportation or other services used by
us or third parties with which we conduct business, whether due to fire, other natural disaster,
power or communications failure, act of terrorism or war or otherwise. Nearly all of our employees
in our primary locations, including Greenwich, CT, New York City, NY, and Roseland, NJ, work in
close proximity to each other. If a disruption occurs in one location and our employees in that
location are unable to communicate with or travel to other locations, our ability to service and
interact with our clients may suffer and we may not be able to implement successfully contingency
plans that depend on communication or travel.
Our operations also rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and
other information in our computer systems and networks. Although we take protective measures and
endeavor to modify them as circumstances warrant, our computer systems, software and networks may
be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses or other malicious code and other events
that could have a security impact. If one or more of such events occur, this could potentially
jeopardize our, our clients or our counterparties confidential and other information processed
and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause
interruptions or malfunctions in our, our clients, our counterparties or third parties
operations. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to modify our protective
measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities or other exposures, and we may be subject
to litigation and financial losses that are either not insured against or not fully covered through
any insurance maintained by us.
To be successful, we must profitably expand our business operations. We face numerous risks and
uncertainties as we seek to expand. We seek growth in our business primarily from internal
expansion and through acquisitions. If we are successful in expanding our business, there can be no
assurance that our financial controls, the level and knowledge of our personnel, our operational
abilities, our legal and compliance controls, our risk management procedures and our other
corporate support systems will be adequate to manage our business and our growth. The
ineffectiveness of any of these controls or systems could adversely affect our business and
prospects.
63
Financial services firms have been subject to increased scrutiny and enforcement activity over the
last several years, increasing the risk of financial liability and reputational harm resulting from
adverse regulatory actions. The financial services industry has experienced increased scrutiny and
enforcement activity from a variety of regulators, including the SEC, the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority, or FINRA (formerly NASD), NASDAQ, the state securities commission and state
attorneys general. Penalties and fines sought by regulatory authorities have increased
substantially over the last several years. This regulatory environment has created uncertainty with
respect to a number of transactions that had historically been entered into by financial services
firms and that were generally believed to be permissible and appropriate. We may be adversely
affected by changes in the interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and rules by these
governmental authorities and self-regulatory organizations. We also may be adversely affected as a
result of new or revised legislation or regulations imposed by the U.S. Congress, the SEC, other
U.S. or foreign governmental regulatory authorities or self-regulatory organizations that supervise
the financial markets. Among other things, we could be fined, prohibited from engaging in some of
our business activities or subject to limitations or conditions on our business activities.
Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory action against us could have material adverse
financial effects or cause significant reputational harm to us, which could seriously harm our
business prospects. The Companys broker/dealer subsidiaries are subject to routine audits by
FINRA. If, in the course of these audits, any significant deficiencies are noted by FINRA, we may
incur fines or other censure.
On June 17, 2009, President Obama released draft legislation providing for a comprehensive
restructuring of the regulation of financial services firms. Legislators have introduced other
draft legislation that will affect the securities industry, including Senators Charles Schumer and
Maria Cantwell who have introduced the Shareholders Bill of Rights Act of 2009. While it is too
soon to predict any, or which, of these bodies of legislation will be adopted, or, if adopted, in
what form, new legislation could substantially change the way in which we operate, perhaps
materially and adversely.
In addition, financial services firms are subject to numerous conflicts or perceived conflicts of
interests. The SEC and other federal and state regulators have increased their scrutiny of
potential conflicts of interest. We have adopted various policies, controls and procedures to
address or limit actual or perceived conflicts and regularly seek to review and update our
policies, controls and procedures. However, appropriately dealing with conflicts of interest is
complex and difficult, and our reputation could be damaged if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal
appropriately with conflicts of interest. Our policies and procedures to address conflicts may also
result in increased costs, additional operational personnel and increased regulatory risk. Failure
to adhere to these policies and procedures may result in regulatory sanctions or client litigation.
Extensive regulation of public companies in the U.S. could reduce our revenue and otherwise
adversely affect our business. Highly-publicized financial scandals in past years have led to
investor concerns over the integrity of the U.S. financial markets, and have prompted Congress, the
SEC, the NYSE and NASDAQ to significantly expand corporate governance, internal control over
financial reporting and public disclosure requirements. The current crisis is likely to lead to
more regulation of both public companies and the financial services industry. To the extent that
private companies, in order to avoid becoming subject to these requirements, decide to forgo
initial public offerings, or list their securities instead on non-U.S. securities exchanges, our
equity underwriting business may be adversely affected. In addition, any new corporate governance
rules may divert a companys attention away from capital market transactions, including securities
offerings and acquisition and disposition transactions. These factors, in addition to adopted or
proposed accounting and disclosure changes, may have an adverse effect on our business. In
addition, we could be directly impacted, as a public company, by such changes or developments.
Our business is subject to significant credit risk, and the financial difficulty of another
prominent financial institution could adversely affect financial markets. In the normal course of
our businesses, we are involved in the execution and settlement of various customer transactions
and financing of various principal securities transactions. These activities are transacted on a
cash, margin or delivery-versus-payment basis and are subject to the risk of counterparty or
customer nonperformance. Although transactions are generally collateralized by the underlying
security or other securities, we still face the risks associated with changes in the market value
of securities that we may be obligated to purchase or have purchased in principal or riskless
principal trades where a counterparty or customer fails to perform. During the recent unprecedented
volatility of the financial markets, this risk greatly increased. We may also incur credit risk in
our derivative transactions to the extent such transactions result in uncollateralized credit
exposure to our counterparties. We seek to control the risk associated with these transactions by establishing and monitoring credit limits and by monitoring
collateral and transaction levels daily.
64
In addition, the creditworthiness and financial well-being of many financial institutions may be
interdependent because of credit, trading, clearing or other relationships between the
institutions. The financial difficulty of one company, therefore, could result in further market
illiquidity or financial difficulties with other institutions and may adversely affect the clearing
agencies, clearing houses, banks, exchanges and other intermediaries with which we conduct
business. Such events, therefore, could adversely impact our business.
Our business and results of operations could be adversely affected by governmental fiscal and
monetary policies. Our cost of funds for lending, investment activities and capital raising are
affected by the fiscal and monetary policies of the U.S. and foreign governmental and banking
authorities, changes to which are not wholly predictable or within our control. Such changes may
also affect the value of the securities we hold.
Our exposure to legal liability is significant, and damages that we may be required to pay and the
reputational harm that could result from legal action against us could materially adversely affect
our businesses. We face significant legal risks in our businesses and, in recent years, the volume
of claims and amount of damages sought in litigation and regulatory proceedings against financial
institutions have been increasing. We have in the past been, and are currently, subject to a
variety of litigation arising from our business, most of which we consider to be routine. Risks in
our business include potential liability under securities or other laws for materially false or
misleading statements made in connection with securities offerings and other transactions,
potential liability for fairness opinions and other advice we provide to participants in
strategic transactions and disputes over the terms and conditions of trading arrangements. We are
also subject to claims arising from disputes with employees for alleged discrimination or
harassment, among other things. These risks often may be difficult to assess or quantify, and their
existence and magnitude often remain unknown for substantial periods of time.
As a brokerage and investment banking firm, we depend to a large extent on our reputation for
integrity and high-caliber professional services to attract and retain clients. As a result, if a
client is not satisfied with our services, it may be more damaging in our business than in other
businesses. Moreover, our role as underwriter to our clients on important underwritings or as
advisor for mergers and acquisitions and other transactions involves complex analysis and the
exercise of professional judgment, including rendering fairness opinions in connection with
mergers and other transactions. Therefore, our activities may subject us to the risk of significant
legal liabilities to our clients and aggrieved third parties, including shareholders of our clients
who could bring securities class action lawsuits against us. Our investment banking engagements
typically include broad indemnities from our clients and provisions to limit our exposure to legal
claims relating to our services, but these provisions may not protect us or may not be enforceable
in all cases. As a result, we may incur significant legal and other expenses in defending against
litigation and may be required to pay substantial damages for settlements and adverse judgments.
Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory action against us could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations or cause significant reputational harm to us, which
could seriously harm our business and prospects.
We are subject to claims and litigations in the ordinary course of our business. For information
regarding certain pending claims, see Legal Proceedings.
Employee misconduct could harm us and is difficult to detect and deter. There have been a number
of highly publicized cases involving fraud or other misconduct by employees in the financial
services industry in recent years, and we run the risk that employee misconduct could occur at our
company. For example, misconduct by employees could involve the improper use or disclosure of
confidential information, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious reputational or
financial harm. It is not always possible to deter employee misconduct and the precautions we take
to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases. We may suffer significant
reputational harm for any misconduct by our employees.
Our businesses could be adversely affected by market uncertainty or lack of confidence among
customers and investors due to difficult geopolitical or market conditions. Our investment banking
business has been and may continue to be adversely affected by market conditions. Unfavorable
economic or geopolitical conditions have and may continue to adversely affect customer and investor
confidence, resulting in a substantial industry-wide decline in underwritings and financial
advisory transactions. Additionally, market uncertainty and unfavorable economic conditions may result in fewer institutional clients with
lesser amounts of assets to trade.
In each case this could have an adverse effect on our revenues
and profits. Additionally, unfavorable returns on investment, whether due to general adverse market
conditions or otherwise, could adversely affect our ability to retain clients and attract new
clients.
65
The impact of the current market and regulatory environment on trading customers may adversely
affect our sales and trading commission revenues. A large number of our institutional investor
sales and trading customers are also financial institutions, including hedge funds, banks,
insurance companies and institutional money managers. The majority of transactions conducted with
us relate to financial services companies. The current market environment may cause some of these
companies to curtail their investment activities or even cease to do business, which may reduce our
commissions. For example, a number of hedge funds have recently been experiencing significant
investor requests to withdraw funds in addition to having to curtail certain investing activities
as a result of regulatory limitations on short selling. Several hedge fund customers have announced
their intention to close.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
Provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, agreements to which we are a party,
regulations to which we are subject and provisions of our equity incentive plans could delay or
prevent a change in control of our company and entrench current management. Our Board of Directors
may, if it deems it advisable, take actions that have the effect of deterring a takeover or other
offer for our securities.
Any such actions, together with provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, as
well as New York law, could make more difficult efforts by shareholders to change our Board of
Directors or management.
Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws provide:
|
|
|
for the classification of our Board of Directors into three classes,
with staggered terms such that only approximately one-third of our
directors are elected each year; |
|
|
|
|
for limitations on the personal liability of our directors to the
Company and to our shareholders to the fullest extent permitted by
law, which may reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against
directors and may discourage or deter shareholders or management from
bringing a lawsuit against directors for breach of their duty of care; |
|
|
|
|
that special meetings of shareholders can be called only by our
President and Chief Executive Officer or by resolution of the Board of
Directors and do not provide our shareholders with the right to call a
special meeting or to require the Board of Directors to call a special
meeting; and |
|
|
|
|
that subject to rights of any series of preferred stock or any other
series or class of stock set forth in our Certificate of
Incorporation, any vacancy on the Board of Directors resulting from
death, resignation, retirement, disqualification, removal from office
or other cause or newly created directorships, may be filled only by
the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors, and a
director can be removed from office without cause only by a majority
vote of the Board of Directors or by the affirmative vote of the
holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the then outstanding
voting stock, voting together as a single class. |
In addition, our brokerage businesses are heavily regulated, and some of our regulators require
that they approve transactions which could result in a change of control, as defined by the
then-applicable rules of our regulators. The requirement that this approval be obtained may prevent
or delay transactions that would result in a change of control.
The market price of our common stock may fluctuate in the future. The market price of our common
stock has fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate in the future depending upon many factors,
including our results of operations and perceived prospects and the prospects of the financial
marketplaces in general, differences between our actual financial and operating results and those
expected by investors and analysts, changes in analysts recommendations or projections, seasonality, changes in general valuations for companies
in our business segment, changes in general economic or market conditions and broad market
fluctuations.
66
Future sales or anticipated future sales of our common stock in the public market, by us, by
MatlinPatterson or by others, could cause our stock price to decline. We may in the future issue
additional shares of common stock or securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or
that represent the right to receive, common stock. The issuance of any additional shares of common
stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for common stock or that represent the right
to receive common stock, or the exercise of such securities, could be substantially dilutive to
holders of our common stock. Holders of our common stock have no preemptive rights that entitle
holders to purchase their pro rata share of any offering of shares of any class or series, and
therefore, such sales or offerings could result in increased dilution to our shareholders. The
market price of our common stock could decline as a result of sales of, or an expectation of sales
of, shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for common stock.
In addition, the sale or anticipated future sale of a significant number of shares of our common
stock in the open market by MatlinPatterson or others, whether pursuant to a resale prospectus or
pursuant to Rule 144, promulgated under the Securities Act, may also have a material adverse effect
on the market price of our common stock. Any such decline in our stock price could impair our
ability to raise capital in the future through the sale of additional equity securities at a price
we deem appropriate.
We have granted to several of our significant shareholders and certain others rights with respect
to registration under the Securities Act of the offer and sale of our common stock. These rights
include both demand rights, which require us to file a registration statement if asked by such
holders, as well as incidental, or piggyback, rights granting the right to such holders to be
included in a registration statement filed by us. As of June 30, 2009, there were approximately
63,814,497 shares of our common stock to which these rights pertain. Of these shares, 9,500,000
were sold in our August 2009 underwritten public offering. The SEC has declared effective a
registration statement covering the resale of shares held by a shareholder, of which approximately
1,200,000 shares remain unsold as of the date of this report. These sales might impact the
liquidity of our common stock and might have a dilutive effect on existing shareholders, making it
more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price
that we deem appropriate.
We do not expect to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future. We do not anticipate that we
will pay any dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. We expect to
retain all future earnings, if any, for investment in our business.
Because MatlinPatterson FA Acquisition LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(MatlinPatterson) and Eric J. Gleacher, the Chairman of our Board of Directors, each controls a
significant percentage of the voting power of our common stock, they can exert significant
influence over the Company. As of June 30, 2009,
MatlinPatterson controlled approximately 42 percent of
the voting power of our common stock and Eric J. Gleacher controlled
approximately 14 percent of the
voting power of our common stock. As a result of MatlinPattersons sale of 6,000,000 shares of
common stock in our August 2009 underwritten public offering, its beneficial ownership has been
reduced to approximately 32 percent. Either MatlinPatterson or Mr. Gleacher, acting alone, can exert
significant influence over corporate actions requiring shareholder approval. As a result, it may be
difficult for other investors to affect the outcome of any shareholder vote.
In addition, if any of our shareholders, including MatlinPatterson and Mr. Gleacher, who in the
aggregate own a majority of our common stock choose to act together, they will be able to direct
the election of all of the members of our Board of Directors and determine the outcome of most
matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders, including matters involving mergers or other
business combinations, the acquisition or disposition of assets, the incurrence of indebtedness,
the issuance of any additional shares of common stock or other equity securities and the payment of
dividends on common stock. Furthermore, they would have the power to prevent or cause a change in
control, and could take other actions that might be favorable to them but not to our other
shareholders.
67
We are no longer a controlled company within the meaning of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. As a
result, we are subject to all of the NASDAQ corporate governance requirements and we may be
delisted if we fail to comply. From our recapitalization in 2007 until June 2009, we operated as a
controlled company, which allowed us to elect to not comply with certain NASDAQ corporate
governance requirements, including requirements that (1) a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors, (2)
compensation of officers be determined or recommended to the board of directors by a majority of
its independent directors or by a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent
directors and (3) director nominees be selected or recommended by a majority of the independent
directors or by a nominating committee composed solely of independent directors.
Following the
consummation of the Gleacher transaction on June 5, 2009, MatlinPatterson owned less than 50 percent of
the voting power of our common stock, and therefore we ceased to be a controlled company within
the meaning of the rules. In order to comply with the NASDAQ corporate governance rules, we have
appointed independent directors to our committees. Currently, our Audit Committee and Directors and
Corporate Governance Committee are composed entirely of independent directors, and our Executive
Compensation Committee is composed of a majority of independent directors. In addition, we plan to
take the following actions:
|
|
|
One year after the closing of the Gleacher transaction, the Executive
Compensation Committee will be composed entirely of independent
directors; and |
|
|
|
|
One year after the closing of the Gleacher transaction, the majority
of our Board of Directors will be composed of independent directors. |
We are actively working to be in compliance with the NASDAQ requirements by the required phase-in
date, but have not yet achieved that status. If we violate the NASDAQ requirements, we may be
delisted.
68
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
As reported on our Current Report on Form 8-K on June 5, 2009, the Company, upon the closing of the
Gleacher Transaction and pursuant to the Merger Agreement, issued and sold 23 million shares of
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company (the Stock Issuance) to certain
stockholders of Gleacher Partners Inc. and each of the holders of interests in Gleacher Holdings
LLC other than Gleacher Partners Inc. (collectively the Selling Parties). The Stock Issuance was
agreed upon between the Company and the Selling Parties in connection with the negotiation of the
Merger Agreement. The Stock Issuance was made in a private placement in reliance upon exemptions
from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated
thereunder. Based on representations provided by Gleacher Partners Inc. and the Selling Parties, the
Company believes that each of the parties receiving shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share, of the Company pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement were accredited investors as
defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D.
Item 4. Submission of matters to a vote of security holders
|
A. |
|
Annual meeting was held on June 16, 2009. |
|
|
B. |
|
Election of Directors: (There were no broker non-votes with respect to the election of Directors) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld Authority |
Class I Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert A. Gerard |
|
|
62,722,384 |
|
|
|
1,413,602 |
|
Class II Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lee Fensterstock |
|
|
62,463,103 |
|
|
|
1,672,883 |
|
Eric Gleacher |
|
|
62,463,053 |
|
|
|
1,672,933 |
|
Christopher R. Pechock |
|
|
61,343,457 |
|
|
|
2,792,529 |
|
Class III Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Victor Mandel |
|
|
63,398,982 |
|
|
|
737,004 |
|
|
C. |
|
Directors Whose Term of Office Continued After the Annual Meeting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration of Term as Director |
Peter J. McNierney |
|
|
2010 |
|
Frank S. Plimpton |
|
|
2010 |
|
Mark R. Patterson |
|
|
2011 |
|
Robert S. Yingling |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
D. |
|
Other matters voted on at the Annual Meeting |
|
1. |
|
To consider and act upon a proposal to approve an amended and restated
Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc. 2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Plan (the 2003 Plan), which would increase the number of shares of
Common Stock available for the grant of awards from 100,000 to
2,000,000, increase the individual annual dollar limit on grants of
stock options and restricted stock under the 2003 Plan from $50,000 to
$100,000, permit Non-Employee Directors to elect whether their annual
grants under the 2003 Plan will be made in the form of stock options
or restricted stock, permit Non-Employee Directors to elect to receive
their annual cash Directors fees in the form of stock options or
restricted stock (rather than just restricted stock), permit the Board
to determine the vesting schedule and term of stock options granted
under the 2003 Plan, and restate the 2003 Plan in its entirety; |
|
|
|
|
|
For: |
|
|
57,063,367 |
|
Against: |
|
|
3,376,026 |
|
Abstain: |
|
|
4,546 |
|
Broker non-votes: |
|
|
3,692,047 |
|
69
|
2. |
|
To consider and act upon a proposal to approve an amended and restated
Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc. 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan
(the 2007 Plan), which would increase the number of shares of Common
Stock available for the grant of awards by 5,000,000 shares, clarify
other provisions of the 2007 Plan and restate the 2007 Plan in its
entirety; |
|
|
|
|
|
For: |
|
|
56,875,653 |
|
Against: |
|
|
3,561,630 |
|
Abstain: |
|
|
6,656 |
|
Broker non-votes: |
|
|
3,692,047 |
|
|
3. |
|
To consider and act upon a proposal to approve an Amendment of the
Companys certificate of incorporation (the Certificate of
Incorporation) to effect a reverse stock split at a ratio of not less
than one-for-three, nor more than one-for-six, at any time prior to
June 16, 2010, with the exact ratio to be determined by the Board of
Directors; and |
|
|
|
|
|
For: |
|
|
60,488,606 |
|
Against: |
|
|
3,644,160 |
|
Abstain: |
|
|
3,218 |
|
Broker non-votes: |
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
To consider and act upon a proposal to ratify the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accounting
firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
For: |
|
|
63,422,195 |
|
Against: |
|
|
534,452 |
|
Abstain: |
|
|
179,338 |
|
Broker non-votes: |
|
|
|
|
Item 5. Other information
None
70
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of
Incorporation of Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc. dated
June 5, 2009, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2009 and
incorporated herein by reference thereto). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Broadpoint
Gleacher Securities Group, Inc. dated June 5, 2009, Inc.
(filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed June 8, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference thereto). |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Broadpoint Gleacher
Securities Group, Inc. dated June 5, 2009, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed June 8, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference
thereto). |
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
Non-Compete and Non-Solicit Agreement dated as of March 2,
2009 by and between Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc. and
Eric Gleacher (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 4, 2009 and
incorporated herein by reference thereto). |
|
|
|
10.73
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of March 2, 2009 by and
between Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc. and Eric Gleacher
(filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K filed March 4, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference thereto). |
|
|
|
10.74
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Broadpoint
Securities Group, Inc., Magnolia Advisory LLC, Gleacher
Partners Inc., certain stockholders of Gleacher Partners
Inc. and each of the holders of interests in Gleacher
Holdings LLC, dated as of March 2, 2009 (filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed
March 4, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference
thereto). |
|
|
|
10.75
|
|
Stock Option Agreement ($3.00 exercise price) dated
December 18, 2008 by and between Broadpoint Securities
Group, Inc. and Lee Fensterstock (filed as Exhibit 10.75 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 26,
2009 and incorporated herein by reference thereto). |
|
|
|
10.76
|
|
Stock Option Agreement ($4.00 exercise price) dated
December 18, 2008 by and between Broadpoint Securities
Group, Inc. and Lee Fensterstock (filed as Exhibit 10.76 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 26,
2009 and incorporated herein by reference thereto). |
|
|
|
10.77
|
|
Stock Option Agreement ($3.00 exercise price) dated
December 18, 2008 by and between Broadpoint Securities
Group, Inc. and Peter McNierney (filed as Exhibit 10.77 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 26,
2009 and incorporated herein by reference thereto). |
|
|
|
10.78
|
|
Stock Option Agreement ($4.00 exercise price) dated
December 18, 2008 by and between Broadpoint Securities
Group, Inc. and Peter McNierney (filed as Exhibit 10.78 to
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 26,
2009 and incorporated herein by reference thereto). |
|
|
|
10.79
|
|
Restricted Stock Units Agreement dated January 1, 2009 by
and between Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc. and Peter
McNierney (filed as Exhibit 10.79 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed March 26, 2009 and incorporated
herein by reference thereto). |
|
|
|
10.80
|
|
Restricted Stock Units Agreement dated January 1, 2009 by
and between Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc. and Lee
Fensterstock (filed as Exhibit 10.80 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 26, 2009 and
incorporated herein by reference thereto). |
71
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.81
|
|
Restricted Stock Units Agreement dated February 13, 2009 by
and between Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc. and Lee
Fensterstock (filed as Exhibit 10.81 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 26, 2009 and
incorporated herein by reference thereto). |
|
|
|
10.82
|
|
Restricted Stock Units Agreement dated February 13, 2009 by
and between Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc. and Peter
McNierney (filed as Exhibit 10.82 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed March 26, 2009 and incorporated
herein by reference thereto). |
|
|
|
10.83
|
|
Restricted Stock Units Agreement dated February 13, 2009 by
and between Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc. and Robert
Turner (filed as Exhibit 10.83 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed March 26, 2009 and incorporated
herein by reference thereto). |
|
|
|
10.84
|
|
Restricted Stock Units Agreement dated February 13, 2009 by
and between Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc. and Patricia
Arciero-Craig (filed as Exhibit 10.84 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 26, 2009 and
incorporated herein by reference thereto). |
|
|
|
10.85
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated June 5, 2009 by and
between Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc. and Eric J.
Gleacher (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2009 and incorporated
herein by reference thereto). |
|
|
|
10.86
|
|
Trade Name and Trademark Agreement, dated June 5, 2009 by
and among Broadpoint Securities Group, Inc., Eric J.
Gleacher and certain other parties thereto (filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed June 8, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference
thereto). |
|
|
|
10.87
|
|
Amended and Restated Broadpoint
Gleacher Securities
Group, Inc. 2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed June 22, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference
thereto). |
|
|
|
10.88
|
|
Amended and Restated Broadpoint Gleacher Securities
Group, Inc. 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed June 22, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference
thereto). |
|
|
|
10.89
|
|
Form of 2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan Restricted
Stock Agreement, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
10.90
|
|
Form of 2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan Stock Option
Agreement, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
10.91
|
|
Restricted Stock Units Agreement dated June 30, 2009 by and
between Broadpoint Gleacher Securities Group, Inc. and
Peter McNierney, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
10.92
|
|
Restricted Stock Units Agreement dated June 30, 2009 by and
between Broadpoint Gleacher Securities Group, Inc. and Lee
Fensterstock, filed herewith. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code. |
72
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadpoint Gleacher Securities Group, Inc. |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
August 14, 2009 |
|
|
|
/s/ Lee Fensterstock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lee Fensterstock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
August 14, 2009 |
|
|
|
/s/ Robert I. Turner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert I. Turner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
73