Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-10524
UDR, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation of organization)
|
|
54-0857512
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
1745 Shea Center Drive, Suite 200, Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80129
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
(720) 283-6120
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of
large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the issuers common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of April 29,
2010, was 162,170,878.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
UDR, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate held for investment |
|
$ |
6,115,026 |
|
|
$ |
5,995,290 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,414,593 |
) |
|
|
(1,350,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,700,433 |
|
|
|
4,645,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate under development
(net of accumulated depreciation of $1,464 and $1,226) |
|
|
237,923 |
|
|
|
318,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate owned, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
|
4,938,356 |
|
|
|
4,963,754 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
19,920 |
|
|
|
5,985 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
37,992 |
|
|
|
37,650 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
8,642 |
|
|
|
8,879 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
26,710 |
|
|
|
26,601 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
13,241 |
|
|
|
14,126 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
63,055 |
|
|
|
67,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,115,716 |
|
|
$ |
5,132,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt |
|
$ |
1,945,065 |
|
|
$ |
1,989,434 |
|
Unsecured debt |
|
|
1,469,013 |
|
|
|
1,437,155 |
|
Real estate taxes payable |
|
|
16,895 |
|
|
|
16,976 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
20,098 |
|
|
|
19,146 |
|
Security deposits and prepaid rent |
|
|
30,223 |
|
|
|
31,798 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
30,857 |
|
Deferred gains on the sale of depreciable property |
|
|
28,822 |
|
|
|
28,826 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities |
|
|
56,449 |
|
|
|
80,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,598,565 |
|
|
|
3,634,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable non-controlling interests in operating partnership |
|
|
105,229 |
|
|
|
98,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,803,812 shares of 8.00% Series E Cumulative Convertible issued
and outstanding (2,803,812 shares at December 31, 2009) |
|
|
46,571 |
|
|
|
46,571 |
|
3,432,962 shares of 6.75% Series G Cumulative Redeemable issued
and outstanding (3,432,962 shares at December 31, 2009) |
|
|
85,824 |
|
|
|
85,824 |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,369,435 shares issued and outstanding (155,465,482 shares at December 31, 2009) |
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
1,555 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,027,966 |
|
|
|
1,948,669 |
|
Distributions in excess of net income |
|
|
(752,226 |
) |
|
|
(687,180 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(1,403 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total UDR, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
1,408,346 |
|
|
|
1,395,441 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
3,576 |
|
|
|
3,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,411,922 |
|
|
|
1,398,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
5,115,716 |
|
|
$ |
5,132,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
UDR, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income |
|
$ |
151,629 |
|
|
$ |
150,615 |
|
Non-property income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
3,320 |
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues |
|
|
154,949 |
|
|
|
155,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate taxes and insurance |
|
|
19,601 |
|
|
|
20,020 |
|
Personnel |
|
|
13,533 |
|
|
|
12,633 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
8,710 |
|
|
|
8,367 |
|
Repair and maintenance |
|
|
7,912 |
|
|
|
7,209 |
|
Administrative and marketing |
|
|
3,850 |
|
|
|
3,333 |
|
Property management |
|
|
4,170 |
|
|
|
4,142 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
1,654 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
72,207 |
|
|
|
68,985 |
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense incurred |
|
|
35,899 |
|
|
|
36,509 |
|
Net gain on debt extinguishment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,113 |
) |
Amortization of convertible debt premium |
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
Hurricane related expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
9,575 |
|
|
|
9,456 |
|
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses |
|
|
179,132 |
|
|
|
168,126 |
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(24,183 |
) |
|
|
(12,487 |
) |
Loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
(717 |
) |
Tax expense for taxable REIT subsidiary |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(24,985 |
) |
|
|
(13,255 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss |
|
|
(25,026 |
) |
|
|
(13,423 |
) |
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to UDR, Inc. |
|
|
(24,056 |
) |
|
|
(12,629 |
) |
Distributions to preferred stockholders Series E (Convertible) |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
(931 |
) |
Distributions to preferred stockholders Series G |
|
|
(1,448 |
) |
|
|
(1,869 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(26,435 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per weighted average common share basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common distributions declared per share |
|
$ |
0.180 |
|
|
$ |
0.305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding basic and diluted |
|
|
156,131 |
|
|
|
144,176 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
UDR, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except for share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss |
|
$ |
(25,026 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,423 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
73,430 |
|
|
|
70,379 |
|
Net (loss)/gain on the sale of depreciable property |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
Gains on debt extinguishment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,113 |
) |
Write off of bad debt |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
Write off of note receivable and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
439 |
|
Loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs and other |
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
Amortization of deferred compensation |
|
|
2,898 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
Amortization of convertible debt discount |
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
Prepayments on income taxes |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in operating assets |
|
|
2,044 |
|
|
|
11,051 |
|
(Decrease)/increase in operating liabilities |
|
|
(16,851 |
) |
|
|
3,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
41,510 |
|
|
|
71,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments related to the buyout of joint venture partner |
|
|
(16,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Development of real estate assets |
|
|
(28,565 |
) |
|
|
(53,583 |
) |
Capital expenditures and other major improvements real estate assets, net of escrow reimbursement |
|
|
(10,907 |
) |
|
|
(10,269 |
) |
Capital expenditures non-real estate assets |
|
|
(1,936 |
) |
|
|
(3,343 |
) |
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
(1,084 |
) |
Distributions received from unconsolidated joint venture |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,936 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(57,369 |
) |
|
|
(99,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on secured debt |
|
|
(72,357 |
) |
|
|
(15,196 |
) |
Proceeds from the issuance of secured debt |
|
|
28,052 |
|
|
|
269,969 |
|
Proceeds from the issuance of unsecured debt |
|
|
149,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on unsecured debt |
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
|
|
(200,031 |
) |
Net (repayment)/proceeds of revolving bank debt |
|
|
(68,300 |
) |
|
|
51,100 |
|
Payment of financing costs |
|
|
(1,766 |
) |
|
|
(3,330 |
) |
Issuance of common and restricted stock, net |
|
|
3,442 |
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
Proceeds from the issuance of common shares through public offering, net |
|
|
73,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(1,344 |
) |
|
|
(4,404 |
) |
Distributions paid to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(2,379 |
) |
|
|
(2,800 |
) |
Distributions paid to common stockholders |
|
|
(28,054 |
) |
|
|
(42,125 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
29,794 |
|
|
|
52,050 |
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
13,935 |
|
|
|
24,392 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
5,985 |
|
|
|
12,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
19,920 |
|
|
$ |
37,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid during the year, net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
38,429 |
|
|
$ |
39,376 |
|
Non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of operating partnership non-controlling interests to common stock
(41,804 in 2010 and 110,631 shares in 2009) |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
4,225 |
|
Payment of Special Dividend through the issuance of 11,358,042 shares of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,787 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock awards |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Retirement of fully depreciated assets |
|
|
7,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
UDR, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions in |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Excess of |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
Income/(Loss) |
|
|
interest |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
6,236,774 |
|
|
$ |
132,395 |
|
|
|
155,465,482 |
|
|
$ |
1,555 |
|
|
$ |
1,948,669 |
|
|
$ |
(687,180 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
3,541 |
|
|
$ |
1,398,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(24,021 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
Unrealized gain on derivative financial
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,234 |
) |
Allocation to redeemable non-controllable
interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,056 |
) |
|
|
(1,405 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(25,426 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common and restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,524,638 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,831 |
|
Issuance of common shares through public offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,358,753 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
73,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,310 |
|
Adjustment for conversion of non-controlling interests
of unitholders in operating partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
Common stock distributions declared ($0.18 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,117 |
) |
Preferred stock distributions declared-Series E
($0.322 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(931 |
) |
Preferred stock distributions declared-Series G
($0.421875 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,448 |
) |
Adjustment to reflect redeemable non-controlling
redemption value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
|
6,236,774 |
|
|
$ |
132,395 |
|
|
|
161,369,435 |
|
|
$ |
1,614 |
|
|
$ |
2,027,966 |
|
|
$ |
(752,226 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,403 |
) |
|
$ |
3,576 |
|
|
$ |
1,411,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
UDR, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2010
(UNAUDITED)
1. CONSOLIDATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
UDR, Inc., collectively with our consolidated subsidiaries (we, our, us, the Company
or UDR) is a self-administered real estate investment trust, or REIT, that owns, acquires,
renovates, develops, and manages apartment communities nationwide. The accompanying consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of UDR and its subsidiaries, including United Dominion
Realty, L.P. (the Operating Partnership), and Heritage Communities L.P. (the Heritage OP). As
of March 31, 2010, there were 179,863,065 units in the Operating Partnership outstanding, of which
173,897,719 units or 96.7% were owned by UDR and 5,965,346 units or 3.3% were owned by limited
partners. As of March 31, 2010, UDR owned 100% of the 6,264,460 units outstanding in Heritage OP.
The consolidated financial statements of UDR include the non-controlling interests of the
unitholders in the Operating Partnership. The consolidated financial statements of UDR include the
non-controlling interests of the unitholders in the Heritage OP prior to UDRs ownership of 100% of
the units outstanding in Heritage OP.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared
according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed
or omitted according to such rules and regulations, although management believes that the
disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments and eliminations necessary for the fair presentation of our financial
position as of March 31, 2010, and results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 have been included. Such adjustments are normal and recurring in nature. The interim
results presented are not necessarily indicative of results that can be expected for a full year.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing in UDRs Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 25, 2010.
The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements are presented in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the interim unaudited consolidated financial
statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual amounts
realized or paid could differ from those estimates. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain previously reported amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation.
The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date its financial statements were issued.
No recognized or non-recognized subsequent events were noted.
7
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Accounting Policies
Real Estate Sales
For sales transactions meeting the requirements for full accrual profit recognition, such as
the Company no longer having continuing involvement in the property, we remove the related assets
and liabilities from our consolidated balance sheet and record the gain or loss in the period the
transaction closes. For sale transactions that do not meet the full accrual sale criteria due to
our continuing involvement, we evaluate the nature of the continuing involvement and account for
the transaction under an alternate method of accounting.
Sales of real estate to entities in which we retain or otherwise own an interest are accounted
for as partial sales. If all other requirements for recognizing profit under the full accrual
method have been satisfied and no other forms of continuing involvement are present, we recognize
profit proportionate to the interest of the buyer in the real estate and defer the gain on the
interest we retain in the real estate. The Company will recognize any deferred gain when the
property is then sold to a third party. In transactions accounted by us as partial sales, we
determine if the buyer of the majority equity interest in the venture was provided a preference as
to cash flows in either an operating or a capital waterfall. If a cash flow preference has been
provided, we recognize profit only to the extent that proceeds from the sale of the majority equity
interest exceed costs related to the entire property.
Redeemable non-controlling interests in operating partnerships
Interests in operating partnerships held by limited partners are represented by operating
partnership units (OP Units). The income is allocated to holders of OP Units based upon net
income available to common stockholders and the weighted average number of OP Units outstanding to
total common shares plus OP Units outstanding during the period. Capital contributions,
distributions, and profits and losses are allocated to non-controlling interests in accordance with
the terms of the individual partnership agreements.
Limited partners have the right to require the Operating Partnership to redeem all or a portion of the OP Units held by the limited partner at a redemption price
equal to and in the form of the Cash Amount (as defined in the limited partnership agreement of the
Operating Partnership (the Partnership Agreement)), provided that such OP Units have been
outstanding for at least one year. UDR, as the general partner of the Operating Partnership may, in
its sole discretion, purchase the OP Units by paying to the limited partner either the Cash Amount
or the REIT Share Amount (generally one share of common stock of the Company for each OP Unit), as
defined in the Partnership Agreement. Accordingly, the Company records the OP Units outside of
permanent equity and reports the OP Units at their redemption value at each balance sheet date.
Marketable Securities
Marketable securities represent publicly traded debt securities and are classified as
available for sale and carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a
separate component of stockholders equity. Declines in the value of public and private investments
that management determines are other than temporary are recorded as a provision for loss on
investments. The amortization of any discount and interest income are recorded in Other Income on
the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
We continually evaluate our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures when events or
changes in circumstances indicate that there may be an other-than-temporary decline in value. We
consider various factors to determine if a decrease in the value of the investment is
other-than-temporary. These factors include, but are not limited to, age of the venture, our intent
and ability to retain our investment in the entity, the financial condition and long-term prospects
of the entity, and the relationships with the other joint venture partners and its lenders. The
amount of loss recognized is the excess of the investments carrying amount over its estimated fair
value. If we believe that the decline in fair value is temporary, no impairment is recorded. The
aforementioned factors are taken as a whole by management in determining the valuation of our
investment in unconsolidated entities. Should the
actual results differ from managements judgment, the valuation could be negatively affected
and may result in a negative impact to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
Income Taxes
Due to the structure of the Company as a REIT and the nature of the operations for the
operating properties, no provision for federal income taxes has been provided for at UDR.
Historically, the Company has generally incurred only state and local income, excise and franchise
taxes. UDR elected for certain consolidated subsidiaries to be treated as Taxable REIT Subsidiaries
(TRS), primarily those engaged in condominium conversion and development activities.
Income taxes for our TRS are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected
to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities from a change in tax
rate is recognized in earnings in the period of the enactment date. The Companys deferred tax
assets are generally the result of differing depreciable lives on capitalized assets and timing of
expense recognition for certain accrued liabilities. As of March 31, 2010, UDR has recorded a net
current liability of $2.3 million and a deferred tax asset of approximately $6.6 million and
recorded income tax expense of $65,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted guidance which defines a recognition threshold
and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim periods, disclosure and transition.
The Company recognizes its tax positions and evaluates them using a two-step process. First,
we determine whether a tax position is more likely than not (greater than 50 percent probability)
to be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation
processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Then the Company will determine the
amount of benefit to recognize and record the amount that is more likely than not to be realized
upon ultimate settlement.
UDR had no unrecognized tax benefit, accrued interest or penalties at March 31, 2010. UDR and
its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state
jurisdictions. The tax years 2005 2009 remain open to examination by the major taxing
jurisdictions to which we are subject. When applicable, UDR recognizes interest and/or penalties
related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 810, Consolidation (originally issued as Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 46(R)), which (1)
addresses the effects of eliminating the qualifying special-purpose entity concept from ASC 860,
Transfers and Servicing (formerly SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities), and (2) responds to concerns about the application of
certain key provisions of ASC 810, Consolidation (formerly FIN 46(R), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities), including concerns over the transparency of enterprises involvement with
variable interest entities. ASC 810 is effective for calendar yearend companies beginning on
January 1, 2010. The Company adopted this standard for the interim period ended March 31, 2010.
There was no impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or
disclosures.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, Improving
Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements an amendment to ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures. This amendment provides for more robust disclosures about (1) the different
classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the valuation techniques and inputs
used, (3) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (4) the transfers between Levels 1,
2, and 3. ASU No. 2010-06 is effective for the Company for
interim and annual reporting beginning after December 15, 2009, with one new disclosure
effective after December 15, 2010. See Note 9, Fair Value of Derivatives and Financial
Instruments.
9
3. REAL ESTATE OWNED
Real estate assets owned by the Company consist of income producing operating properties,
properties under development, land held for future development and properties deemed as held for
sale. As of March 31, 2010 the Company owned and consolidated 167 communities in 10 states plus the
District of Columbia totaling 46,357 apartment homes. The following table summarizes the carrying
amounts for our real estate owned (at cost) as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (dollar
amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,672,972 |
|
|
$ |
1,635,401 |
|
Depreciable property held and used: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building and improvements |
|
|
4,184,962 |
|
|
|
4,111,254 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
257,092 |
|
|
|
248,635 |
|
Under development: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
48,653 |
|
|
|
65,525 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
190,734 |
|
|
|
254,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned |
|
$ |
6,354,413 |
|
|
$ |
6,315,047 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,416,057 |
) |
|
|
(1,351,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned, net |
|
$ |
4,938,356 |
|
|
$ |
4,963,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Discontinued operations represent properties that UDR has either sold or which management
believes meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale. In order to be classified as held for
sale and reported as discontinued operations, a propertys operations and cash flows have or will
be divested to a third party by the Company whereby UDR will not have any significant continuing
involvement in the ownership or operation of the property after the sale or disposition. The
results of operations of the property are presented as discontinued operations for all periods
presented and do not impact the net earnings reported by the Company. Once a property is deemed as
held for sale, depreciation is no longer recorded. However, if the Company determines that the
property no longer meets the criteria of held for sale, the Company will recapture any unrecorded
depreciation for the property. The assets and liabilities of properties deemed as held for sale are
presented separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Properties deemed as held for sale are
reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value less the costs to sell
the assets.
UDR did not dispose of any communities during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
nor did we have any classified as held for disposition at March 31, 2010 and 2009. The only
activity related to discontinued operations during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
was net loss on the sale of depreciable property, excluding RE3 of $41,000 and $168,000,
respectively.
5. JOINT VENTURES
UDR has entered into joint ventures with unrelated third parties that are either consolidated
and included in real estate owned on our Consolidated Balance Sheets or are accounted for under the
equity method of accounting,
which are not consolidated and are included in investment in unconsolidated joint ventures on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company consolidates an entity in which we own less than 100%
when we have the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly affect the
entitys economic performance. In addition, the Company consolidates any joint venture in which we
are the general partner or managing member and the third party partner or member does not have the
ability to substantively participate in the decision-making process nor the ability to remove us as
general partner or managing member, without cause.
10
UDRs joint ventures are funded with a combination of debt and equity. Our losses are limited
to our investment and the Company does not guarantee any debt (issued by our unconsolidated joint
ventures), capital payout or other obligations associated with our joint venture portfolio. The
Company guarantees 100% of the debt issued by one of our consolidated joint ventures for which our
equity ownership percentage is 98%.
Consolidated Joint Ventures
UDR is a partner with an unaffiliated third party in a joint venture (989 Elements) which
owns and operates a 23-story, 166 home high-rise apartment community in the central business
district of Bellevue, Washington. On December 30, 2009, UDR entered into an agreement with our
partner to purchase its 49% interest in 989 Elements for $7.7 million. Concurrently, our partner
resigned as managing member and appointed UDR as managing member. In addition, our partner
relinquished its voting rights and approval rights and its ability to substantively participate in
the decision-making process of the joint venture resulting in the consolidation of the joint
venture. The joint venture assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value. The fair value of
the assets was $55.0 million ($54.8 million of real estate owned and $200,000 of current assets)
and the fair value of liabilities was $34.1 million ($33.4 million of a construction loan, net of
fair market value adjustment of $1.6 million and $700,000 of current liabilities) at the
consolidation date. On December 31, 2009, the Company repaid the outstanding balance of $35.0
million on the construction loan held by 989 Elements. In March 2010, the Company paid $7.7
million and acquired our partners 49% interest in the joint venture. At closing of the agreement
and at March 31, 2010, the Company interest in 989 Elements was 98%.
UDR is a partner with an unaffiliated third party in a joint venture (Elements Too) which
owns and operates a 274 home apartment community in the central business district of Bellevue,
Washington. Construction began in the fourth quarter of 2006 and was completed in the first
quarter of 2010. On October 16, 2009, our partner resigned as managing member and appointed UDR as
managing member. In addition, our partner relinquished its voting rights and approval rights and
its ability to substantively participate in the decision-making process of the joint venture
resulting in the consolidation of the joint venture. The joint venture assets and liabilities were
recorded at fair value. Prior to consolidation, our equity investment in Elements Too was $24.4
million (net of an $11.0 million equity loss discussed below) at October 16, 2009. The fair value
of the assets was $100.3 million ($99.5 million of real estate owned and $814,000 of current
assets) and the fair value of liabilities was $75.6 million ($70.5 million of a construction loan,
$917,000 of a derivative instrument, and $4.2 million of current liabilities). On December 30,
2009, UDR entered into an agreement with our partner to purchase its 49% interest in Elements Too
for $3.2 million. In March 2010, the Company paid the outstanding balance of $3.2 million and
acquired our partners 49% interest in the joint venture. During the three months ended March 31,
2010, the Company repaid the outstanding balance of $70.5 million on the construction loan held by
Elements Too.
UDR is a partner with an unaffiliated third party in a joint venture (Bellevue) which owns
an operating retail site in Bellevue, Washington. The Company initially planned to develop a 430
home high rise apartment building with ground floor retail on an existing operating retail center.
However, during the year ended December 31, 2009, the joint venture decided to continue to operate
the retail property as opposed to developing a high rise apartment building on the site. On
December 30, 2009, UDR entered into an agreement with our partner to purchase its 49% interest in
Bellevue for $5.2 million. In addition, our partner resigned as managing member and appointed UDR
as managing member. Concurrent with its resignation, our partner relinquished its voting rights and
approval rights and its ability to substantively participate in the decision-making process of the
joint venture resulting in the consolidation of the joint venture at fair value. Prior to
consolidation, our equity investment in Bellevue was $5.0 million (net of a $5.0 million equity
loss discussed below). The fair value of the assets was $33.0 million ($32.8 million of real estate
owned and $211,000 of current assets) and the fair value of liabilities was $23.0 million ($22.3
million of a mortgage payable, $506,000 of a derivative instrument, and $213,000 of current
liabilities). In March
2010, the Company paid $5.2 million and acquired our partners 49% interest in the joint
venture. At closing of the agreement and at March 31, 2010, the Companys interest in Bellevue was
98%.
11
The activities and accounts of these joint ventures are included in the Companys consolidated
financial position as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and consolidated results of
operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
The Company recognizes earnings or losses from our investments in unconsolidated joint
ventures consisting of our proportionate share of the net earnings or loss of the joint venture.
In addition, we may earn fees for providing management and development services to the
unconsolidated joint ventures. As of March 31, 2010, UDR had investments in the following
unconsolidated joint ventures which are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
In August 2009, UDR and an unaffiliated third party, Kuwait Finance House, formed a jointed
venture for the investment of up to $450.0 million in multifamily properties located in key, high
barrier to entry markets. The partners will contribute equity of $180.0 million of which the
Companys maximum equity will be 30% or $54.0 million when fully invested. At closing and at March
31 2010, the Company owned 30%. Our investment at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $382,000
and $242,000, respectively. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the joint venture did not own
any multifamily properties.
In November 2007, UDR and an unaffiliated third party formed a joint venture which owns and
operates 10 operating properties located in Texas (3,992 homes). UDR contributed cash and property
equal to 20% of the fair value of the properties. The unaffiliated member contributed cash equal
to 80% of the fair value of the properties comprising the joint venture, which was then used to
purchase the nine operating properties from UDR. Our initial investment was $20.4 million. Our
investment at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $12.9 million and $13.9 million,
respectively.
We evaluate our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that there may be an other-than-temporary decline in value. We consider
various factors to determine if a decrease in the value of the investment is other-than-temporary.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company did not recognize any
other-than-temporary decreases in the value of its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.
Summary financial information relating to 100% of all the unconsolidated joint ventures
operations (not just our proportionate share), is presented below for the three months ended March
31, (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
10,003 |
|
|
$ |
11,520 |
|
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,043 |
|
|
|
5,155 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
(3,614 |
) |
|
|
(2,886 |
) |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes results of operations of joint ventures subsequently consolidated during the
fourth quarter of 2009. See Consolidated Joint Ventures above. |
12
The combined summary balance sheets relating to 100% of all the unconsolidated joint ventures
(not just our proportionate share) is presented below as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate, net |
|
$ |
316,092 |
|
|
$ |
320,786 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
323,310 |
|
|
|
332,694 |
|
Amount due to UDR |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
Third party debt |
|
|
254,000 |
|
|
|
254,000 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
260,117 |
|
|
|
265,091 |
|
Equity |
|
|
63,193 |
|
|
|
67,603 |
|
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had deferred profit from the sale of properties of $28.8
million, which the Company will not recognize until the underlying property is sold to a third
party. The Company recognized $391,000 and $474,000 of management fees for our involvement in the
joint ventures for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Company may, in the future, make additional capital contributions to certain of our joint
ventures should additional capital contributions be necessary to fund development costs or
operating shortfalls.
6. SECURED DEBT
Our secured debt instruments generally feature either monthly interest and principal or
monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. For purposes of
classification of the following table, variable rate debt with a derivative financial instrument
designated as a cash flow hedge is deemed as fixed rate debt due to the Company having effectively
established the interest rate for the underlying debt instrument. Secured debt on continuing
operations, which encumbers $3.0 billion or 47% of UDRs real estate owned based upon book value
($3.4 billion or 53% of UDRs real estate owned is unencumbered) consists of the following as of
March 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Principal Outstanding |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Communities |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Years to Maturity |
|
|
Encumbered |
|
Fixed Rate Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
$ |
341,907 |
|
|
$ |
506,203 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable |
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
949,288 |
|
|
|
949,971 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed rate secured debt |
|
|
1,304,520 |
|
|
|
1,469,499 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
353,094 |
|
|
|
243,810 |
|
|
|
2.23 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Tax-exempt secured note payable |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
260,451 |
|
|
|
249,125 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable rate secured debt |
|
|
640,545 |
|
|
|
519,935 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total secured debt |
|
$ |
1,945,065 |
|
|
$ |
1,989,434 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR entered into secured revolving credit facilities with Fannie Mae with an aggregate
commitment of $1.4 billion at March 31, 2010. The Fannie Mae credit facilities are for an initial
term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and certain variable rate facilities
can be extended for an additional five years at our option. We have $949.3 million of the funded
balance fixed at a weighted average interest rate of 5.4% and the remaining balance on these
facilities is currently at a weighted average variable rate of 1.6%.
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
|
Borrowings outstanding |
|
$ |
1,209,739 |
|
|
$ |
1,199,096 |
|
Weighted average borrowings during the period ended |
|
|
1,202,444 |
|
|
|
1,033,658 |
|
Maximum daily borrowings during the period ended |
|
|
1,209,739 |
|
|
|
1,199,322 |
|
Weighted average interest rate during the period ended |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Weighted average interest rate at the end of the period |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
The Company will from time to time acquire properties subject to fixed rate debt instruments.
In those situations, management will record the secured debt at its estimated fair value and
amortize any difference between the fair value and par to interest expense over the life of the
underlying debt instrument. The unamortized fair market adjustment was a net discount of $979,000
and $987,000 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Fixed Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable. Fixed rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly
installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from August 2010 through June
2016 and carry interest rates ranging from 2.66% to 6.84%. Mortgage notes payable includes debt
associated with development activities.
Tax-exempt secured notes payable. Fixed rate mortgage notes payable that secure tax-exempt
housing bond issues mature in March 2031 and carry an interest rate of 5.30%. Interest on these
notes is payable in semi-annual installments.
Secured credit facilities. At March 31, 2010, UDRs fixed rate secured credit facilities
consisted of $949.3 million on a $1.4 billion aggregate commitment under five revolving secured
credit facilities with Fannie Mae (the Company also owes $260.5 million under the variable rate
component of this credit facility). The Fannie Mae credit facilities are for an initial term of 10
years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and certain variable rate facilities can be
extended for an additional five years at our option. As of March 31, 2010, the fixed rate Fannie
Mae credit facilities had a weighted average fixed rate of interest of 5.40%.
Variable Rate Debt
Mortgage notes payable. Variable rate mortgage notes payable are generally due in monthly
installments of principal and interest and mature at various dates from August 2010 through April
2016. The mortgage notes payable are based on LIBOR plus basis points, which translate into
interest rates ranging from 0.91% to 5.25% at March 31, 2010.
Tax-exempt secured note payable. The variable rate mortgage note payable that secures
tax-exempt housing bond issue matures in March 2030. Interest on this note is payable in monthly
installments. The variable mortgage note has an interest rate of 1.15% as of March 31, 2010.
Secured credit facilities. The variable rate secured credit facilities consisted of $260.5
million outstanding on the Fannie Mae credit facilities. As of March 31, 2010, the variable rate
Fannie Mae credit facilities had a weighted average floating rate of interest of 1.64%.
14
The aggregate maturities, including amortizing principal payments, of our secured debt due
during each of the next five calendar years and thereafter are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Tax Exempt |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Tax Exempt |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Notes Payable |
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Notes Payable |
|
|
Facilities |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
49,944 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,970 |
|
|
$ |
113,211 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
165,125 |
|
2011 |
|
|
103,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,808 |
|
|
|
73,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,513 |
|
|
|
269,053 |
|
2012 |
|
|
56,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,944 |
|
|
|
50,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,529 |
|
|
|
344,762 |
|
2013 |
|
|
61,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,631 |
|
|
|
38,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,543 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,328 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,443 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
70,322 |
|
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
674,607 |
|
|
|
76,476 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
161,409 |
|
|
|
1,023,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
341,907 |
|
|
$ |
13,325 |
|
|
$ |
949,288 |
|
|
$ |
353,094 |
|
|
$ |
27,000 |
|
|
$ |
260,451 |
|
|
$ |
1,945,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. UNSECURED DEBT
A summary of unsecured debt as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is as follows (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Commercial Banks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings outstanding under an unsecured credit facility due July 2012 (a) |
|
$ |
121,000 |
|
|
$ |
189,300 |
|
|
Senior Unsecured Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.90% Medium-Term Notes due March 2010 (includes premium of $34) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,034 |
|
3.625% Convertible Senior Notes due September 2011 (net of discount of
$2,883 and $3,351) (b), (g) |
|
|
123,452 |
|
|
|
122,984 |
|
5.00% Medium-Term Notes due January 2012 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
3.72% Term Notes due July 2012 (c) |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
6.05% Medium-Term Notes due June 2013 |
|
|
122,500 |
|
|
|
122,500 |
|
5.13% Medium-Term Notes due January 2014 (d) |
|
|
184,000 |
|
|
|
184,000 |
|
5.50% Medium-Term Notes due April 2014 (net of discount of $277 and $295) (d) |
|
|
128,223 |
|
|
|
128,205 |
|
5.25% Medium-Term Notes due January 2015 (includes net discount of $615 and
premium $177) (d), (e) |
|
|
324,560 |
|
|
|
175,352 |
|
5.25% Medium-Term Notes due January 2016 (d) |
|
|
83,260 |
|
|
|
83,260 |
|
8.50% Debentures due September 2024 |
|
|
15,644 |
|
|
|
15,644 |
|
4.00% Convertible Senior Notes due December 2035 (net of discount of $1,416
and $1,916) (f), (g) |
|
|
166,334 |
|
|
|
165,834 |
|
Other |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,348,013 |
|
|
|
1,247,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,469,013 |
|
|
$ |
1,437,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
We have a $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility that matures on July 26, 2012.
Under certain circumstances, we may increase the $600 million credit facility to $750 million.
Based on our current credit rating, the $600 million credit facility carries an interest rate
equal to LIBOR plus 47.5 basis points. In addition, the unsecured credit facility contains a
provision that allows us to bid up to 50% of the commitment and we can bid out the entire
unsecured credit facility once per quarter so long as we maintain an investment grade rating. |
|
(b) |
|
Subject to the restrictions on ownership of our common stock and certain other conditions, at
any time on or after July 15, 2011 and prior to the close of business on the second business
day prior to the maturity date of September 15, 2011, and also following the occurrence of
certain events, holders of outstanding 3.625% notes may convert their notes into cash and, if
applicable, shares of our common stock, at the conversion rate in effect at such time. Upon
conversion of the notes, UDR will deliver cash and common stock, if any, based on a daily
conversion value calculated on a proportionate basis for each trading day of the relevant 30
trading day observation period. The initial conversion rate for each $1,000 principal amount
of notes was 26.6326 shares of our common stock (equivalent to an initial conversion price of
approximately $37.55 per share), subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The
Companys Special Dividend paid in January 2009 met the criteria to adjust the conversion rate
and resulted in an adjusted conversion rate of 29.0207 shares of our common stock for each
$1,000 of principal (equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $34.46 per share). If
UDR undergoes certain change in control transactions, holders of the 3.625% notes may require
us to repurchase their notes in whole or in part for cash equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the notes to be repurchased plus any unpaid interest accrued to the repurchase date.
In connection with the issuance of the 3.625% notes, UDR entered into a capped call
transaction covering approximately 6.7 million shares of our common stock, subject to
anti-dilution adjustments similar to those contained in the notes. The capped call expires on
the maturity date of the 3.625% notes. The capped call transaction combines a purchased call
option with a strike price of $37.548 with a written call option with a strike price of
$43.806. The capped call transaction effectively increased the initial conversion price to
$43.806 per share, representing a 40% conversion premium. The net cost of approximately $12.6
million of the capped call transaction was included in stockholders equity. |
15
|
|
|
(c) |
|
The Company had an interest rate swap agreement related to these notes, which expired during
the three months ended March 31, 2010. The notes carried a variable interest rate of 3.72% at
March 31, 2010 and a fixed interest rate of 6.26% at December 31, 2009. |
|
(d) |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company repurchased several different
traunches of its unsecured debt in open market purchases. As a result of these transactions,
we retired debt with a notional value of $159.6 million for $150 million of cash. The gain of
$7.1 million is presented as a separate component of interest expense on our Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Consistent with our
accounting policy, the Company expensed $737,000 million of unamortized financing costs and
$1.8 million of unamortized discount on convertible debt as a result of these debt retirements
for the three months ended March 31, 2009. |
|
(e) |
|
On December 7, 2009, the Company entered into an amended and restated distribution agreement
with respect to the issue and sale by the Company from time to time of its Medium-Term Notes,
Series A Due Nine Months or More From Date of Issue. During the three months ended March 31,
2010, the Company issued $150 million of 5.25% senior unsecured medium-term notes under the
amended and restated distribution agreement dated December 7, 2009. These notes were priced at
99.46% of the principal amount at issuance and had a discount of $783,000 at March 31, 2010. |
|
(f) |
|
Holders of the outstanding 4.00% notes may require us to repurchase their notes in whole or
in part on January 15, 2011, December 15, 2015, December 15, 2020, December 15, 2025 and
December 15, 2030, or upon the occurrence of a fundamental change, for cash equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest. On
or after January 15, 2011, UDR will have the right to redeem the 4.00% notes in whole or in
part, at any time or from time to time, for cash equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
notes to be redeemed plus any accrued and unpaid interest. Subject to the restrictions on
ownership of shares of our common stock and certain other conditions, holders of the 4.00% notes
may convert their notes, into cash and, if applicable, shares of our common stock, at the
conversion rate in effect at such time, as follows: (i) prior to the close of business on the
second business day immediately preceding the stated maturity date at any time on or after
December 15, 2030, and (ii) prior to December 15, 2030 under certain specified circumstances.
The initial conversion rate for the notes was 35.2988 shares of our common stock per $1,000
principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $28.33 per
share), subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. The Companys Special Dividend paid
in January 2009 met the criteria to adjust the conversion rate and the conversion rate was
adjusted to 38.7123 shares of our common stock for each $1,000 of principal (equivalent to a
conversion price of approximately $25.83 per share). |
|
(g) |
|
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted guidance that applies to all convertible debt
instruments that have a net settlement feature, which means that such convertible debt
instruments, by their terms, may be settled either wholly or partially in cash upon
conversion. This guidance requires issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be
settled wholly or partially in cash upon conversion to separately account for the liability
and equity components in a manner reflective of the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing
rate. The adoption impacted the historical accounting for the 3.625% convertible senior notes
due September 2011 and the 4.00% convertible senior notes due December 2035, and resulted in
increased interest expense of $967,000 and $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. |
16
The following is a summary of short-term bank borrowings under UDRs bank credit facility at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
Borrowings outstanding at end of period (1) |
|
|
121,000 |
|
|
|
189,300 |
|
Weighted average daily borrowings during the period ended |
|
|
165,468 |
|
|
|
83,875 |
|
Maximum daily borrowings during the period ended |
|
|
296,700 |
|
|
|
279,400 |
|
Weighted average interest rate during the period ended |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
Weighted average interest rate at the end of the period |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes $11.3 million of letters of credit at March 31, 2010 |
The convertible notes are convertible at the option of the holder, and as such are presented
as if the holder will convert the debt instrument at the earliest available date. The aggregate
maturities of unsecured debt for the five years subsequent to March 31, 2010 are as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank |
|
|
Unsecured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2011 (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
289,594 |
|
|
|
289,594 |
|
2012 |
|
|
121,000 |
|
|
|
199,808 |
|
|
|
320,808 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,308 |
|
|
|
122,308 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,353 |
|
|
|
312,353 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,950 |
|
|
|
423,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
121,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,348,013 |
|
|
$ |
1,469,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The convertible debt balances have been adjusted to reflect the effect of
guidance adopted effective January 2009. Excluding the adjustment, the total
maturities in 2011 would be $294.1 million. |
Our debt instruments contain covenants that we were in compliance with at March 31, 2010.
8. LOSS PER SHARE
Basic loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share is computed based upon common
shares outstanding plus the effect of dilutive stock options and other potentially dilutive common
stock equivalents such as the non-vested restricted stock awards.
17
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share for the
periods presented (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for loss per share basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(26,435 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for loss per share basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
157,192 |
|
|
|
145,543 |
|
Non-vested restricted stock awards |
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
(1,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic and diluted loss per share |
|
|
156,131 |
|
|
|
144,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of the conversion of the operating partnership units, convertible preferred stock,
convertible debt, stock options and restricted stock is not dilutive and is therefore not included
in the above calculations as the Company reported a loss from continuing operations.
If the operating partnership units were converted to common stock, the additional weighted
average common shares outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, would be
5,975,967 and 7,854,830.
The effect of the conversion of the Series E Out-Performance Partnership Shares (the Series E
Out-Performance Program terminated on December 31, 2009) is not dilutive for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 and is not included in the above calculations as the Company reported a loss from
continuing operations.
If the convertible preferred stock were converted to common stock, the additional shares of
common stock outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 would be 3,035,548
weighted average common shares.
If the stock options and unvested restricted stock were converted to common stock, the
additional weighted average common shares outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 would be 1,514,041 and 18,037 weighted average common shares, respectively.
9. FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVES AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or the exit price
that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date. A three-level valuation hierarchy prioritizes observable and unobservable
inputs used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which
are described below:
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
entity has the ability to access. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices
for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated with observable market data. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and
that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes
certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use
significant unobservable inputs.
|
18
The estimated fair
values of the Companys financial instruments either recorded or disclosed on a recurring basis
as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at March 31, 2010 Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets or |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale debt securities- Corporate debt |
|
$ |
37,992 |
|
|
$ |
37,992 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (c) |
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
38,823 |
|
|
$ |
37,992 |
|
|
$ |
831 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (c) |
|
$ |
6,035 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,035 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Contingent purchase consideration (d) |
|
|
6,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,037 |
|
Secured debt instruments- fixed rate: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
353,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,968 |
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable |
|
|
14,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,917 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
964,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
964,641 |
|
Secured debt instruments- variable rate: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
353,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,094 |
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
260,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,451 |
|
Unsecured debt instruments: (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial bank |
|
|
121,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,000 |
|
Senior Unsecured Notes |
|
|
1,356,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,356,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
3,464,127 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,035 |
|
|
$ |
3,458,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at December 31, 2009 Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets or |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale debt securities- Corporate debt |
|
$ |
37,650 |
|
|
$ |
37,650 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (c) |
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
39,944 |
|
|
$ |
37,650 |
|
|
$ |
2,294 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives- Interest rate contracts (c) |
|
$ |
5,947 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,947 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Secured debt instruments- fixed rate: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
516,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516,578 |
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable |
|
|
13,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,540 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
952,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
952,468 |
|
Secured debt instruments- variable rate: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage notes payable |
|
|
243,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,810 |
|
Tax-exempt secured notes payable |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
Fannie Mae credit facilities |
|
|
249,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,125 |
|
Unsecured debt instruments: (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial bank |
|
|
189,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Unsecured Notes |
|
|
1,236,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,236,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
3,434,283 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,947 |
|
|
$ |
3,239,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
See Note 6, Secured Debt |
|
(b) |
|
See Note 7, Unsecured Debt |
|
(c) |
|
See Note 10, Derivatives and Hedging Activity |
|
(d) |
|
As of March 31, 2010, the Company accrued a liability of $6.0 million related to a contingent
purchase consideration on one of its properties. The contingent consideration was determined based
on the fair market value of the related asset which is estimated using Level 3 inputs utilized in a
third party appraisal. |
Financial
Instruments Carried at Fair Value
The fair value of the corporate debt securities is determined by Level 1 inputs which utilize
quoted prices in active markets where we have the ability to access values for identical assets.
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and fair value of the Companys investments at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Corporate debt securities- U.S.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
33,632 |
|
|
$ |
33,066 |
|
Gross unrealized gains |
|
|
4,360 |
|
|
|
4,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value (net carrying amount) |
|
$ |
37,992 |
|
|
$ |
37,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of
netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected
variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an
expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate
curves. The fair values of interest rate options are determined using the market standard
methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest
rates rise above the strike rate of the caps. The variable interest rates used in the calculation
of projected receipts on the cap are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from
observable market interest rate curves and volatilities.
The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own
nonperformance risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance risk in the fair value
measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of
nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit
enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its
derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments
associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads
to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of March 31,
2010 and 2009, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation
adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit
valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a
result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified
in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value
At March 31, 2010, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, notes
receivable, accounts receivable, prepaids, real estate taxes payable, accrued interest payable,
security deposits and prepaid rent, distributions payable and accounts payable approximated their
carrying values because of the short term nature of these instruments. The estimated fair values
of other financial instruments were determined by the Company using available market information
and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market
data and develop estimated fair values. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not
necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize on the disposition of the financial
instruments. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a
material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
We estimate the
fair value of our debt instruments by discounting the remaining
cash flows of the debt instrument at a discount rate equal to the replacement market credit spread
plus the corresponding treasury yields. Factors considered in determining a replacement market
credit spread include general market conditions, borrower specific credit spreads, time remaining
to maturity, loan-to-value ratios and collateral quality (Level 3).
We record impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when events and
circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated
to be generated by the future operation and disposition of those assets are less than the net book
value of those assets. Our cash flow estimates are based upon historical results adjusted to
reflect our best estimate of future market and operating conditions and our estimated holding
periods. The net book value of impaired assets is reduced to fair value. Our estimates of fair
value represent our best estimate based upon Level 3 inputs such as industry trends and reference
to market rates and transactions.
The Company did not recognize any other-than-temporary decrease in the value of its other
investments in unconsolidated joint ventures during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
We consider various factors to determine if a decrease in the value of the investment is
other-than-temporary. These factors include, but are not limited to, age of the venture, our intent
and ability to retain our investment in the entity, the financial condition and long-term prospects
of the entity, and the relationships with the other joint venture partners and its lenders. Based
on the significance of the unobservable inputs, we classify these fair value measurements within
Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
21
After determining an other-than-temporary decrease in the value of an equity method has
occurred, we estimate the fair value of our investment by estimating the proceeds we would receive
upon a hypothetical liquidation of the investment at the date of measurement. Inputs reflect
managements best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the investment giving
consideration to the terms of the joint venture agreement and the estimated discounted future cash
flows to be generated from the underlying joint venture asset. The inputs and assumptions utilized
to estimate the future cash flows of the underlying asset are based upon the Companys evaluation
of the economy, market trends, operating results, and other factors, including judgments regarding
costs to complete any construction activities, lease up and occupancy rates, rental rates,
inflation rates, capitalization rates utilized to estimate the projected cash flows at the
disposition, and discount rates.
10. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITY
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Company is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations and economic
conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and
operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic
risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount,
sources, and duration of its debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments.
Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that
arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain
cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Companys derivative
financial instruments are used to manage
differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Companys known or expected cash
receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to the Companys investments
and borrowings.
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Companys objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest
expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the
Company primarily uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest rate risk management
strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate
amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of
the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest rate caps designated as
cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty if interest rates
rise above the strike rate on the contract in exchange for an up front premium.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify
as cash flow hedges is recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) and is
subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction
affects earnings. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, such derivatives were used
to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt. The ineffective
portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings. During
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded less than $1,000 of
ineffectiveness in earnings attributable to reset date and index mismatches between the derivative
and the hedged item, and the fair value of interest rate swaps that were not zero at inception of
the hedging relationship.
Amounts reported in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) related to derivatives
will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Companys
variable-rate debt. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $5.3
million will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that
were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivative |
|
Instruments |
|
|
Notional |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
327,344 |
|
|
Interest rate caps |
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
113,909 |
|
22
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Companys
exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the strict hedge
accounting requirements. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging
relationships are recorded directly in earnings and resulted in a loss of $317,000 and $55,000 for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of March 31, 2010, the Company
had the following outstanding derivatives that were not designated as hedges in qualifying hedging
relationships (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
Instruments |
|
|
Notional |
|
Interest rate caps |
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
244,787 |
|
Tabular Disclosure of Fair Values of Derivative Instruments on the Balance Sheet
The table below presents the fair value of the Companys derivative financial instruments as
well as their classification on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009 (amounts in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at: |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Balance |
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Sheet Location |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Sheet Location |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
$ |
1,348 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
6,035 |
|
|
$ |
5,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
$ |
1,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,035 |
|
|
$ |
5,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
946 |
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Tabular Disclosure of the Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations
The tables below present the effect of the Companys derivative financial instruments on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (dollar
amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or |
|
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized in Income on |
|
|
(Loss) Recognized in Income on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
|
Amount of Gain or |
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion |
|
|
Derivative (Ineffective Portion |
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified |
|
|
and Amount |
|
|
and Amount |
|
Derivatives in Cash |
|
Recognized in OCI |
|
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
|
from Accumulated |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
Flow Hedging |
|
on Derivative |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
OCI into Income |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
Relationships |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
Testing) |
|
|
Testing) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010: |
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
$ |
(3,314 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
2,080 |
|
|
Other expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(3,314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2009: |
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
$ |
(2,493 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(2,646 |
) |
|
Other expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(2,493 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
Income on |
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
Derivative |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
For the three months
ended March 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
Other income / (expense) |
|
$ |
(317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months
ended March 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Products |
|
Other income / (expense) |
|
$ |
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with some of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision
whereby (1) if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment
of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared
in default on its derivative obligations; or (2) the Company could be declared in default on its
derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due
to the Companys default on the indebtedness.
Certain of the Companys agreements with its derivative counterparties contain provisions
where if there is a change in the Companys financial condition that materially changes the
Companys creditworthiness in an adverse manner, the Company may be required to fully collateralize
its obligations under the derivative instrument.
The Company also has an agreement with a derivative counterparty that incorporates the loan
and financial covenant provisions of the Companys indebtedness with a lender affiliate of the
derivative counterparty. Failure to comply with these covenant provisions would result in the
Company being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreement.
24
As of March 31, 2010, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position related to
these agreements, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance
risk, was $6.6 million. As of March 31, 2010, the Company has not posted any collateral related to
these agreements. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at March 31, 2010, it would
have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of
$6.6 million.
11. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, components of comprehensive
income/(loss) consisted of an unrealized (loss)/gain of ($224,000) and $765,000, respectively, from
the mark-to-market of marketable securities classified as available-for-sale and an unrealized
(loss)/gain of ($1.2 million) and $154,000, respectively, from derivative financial instruments.
The Company allocated a pro-rata share of gain/(loss) of $53,000 and ($47,000) to non-controlling
interests for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Total comprehensive
loss for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $25.4 million and $11.7 million,
respectively.
12. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the modified prospective method for stock based
compensation. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we recognized $2.9 million
and $2.3 million, respectively as stock based compensation expense, which is inclusive of awards
granted to our outside directors.
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Commitments
Real Estate Under Development
The following summarizes the Companys real estate commitments at March 31, 2010 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Costs Incurred |
|
|
Expected Costs |
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
|
Properties |
|
|
to Date |
|
|
to Complete |
|
|
Stake |
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly owned under development |
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
239,387 |
|
|
$ |
22,113 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Contingencies
Litigation and Legal Matters
UDR is subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of
business. UDR cannot determine the ultimate liability with respect to such legal proceedings and
claims at this time. UDR believes that such liability, to the extent not provided for through
insurance or otherwise, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results
of operations or cash flow.
14. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
GAAP guidance requires that segment disclosures present the measure(s) used by the chief
operating decision maker to decide how to allocate resources and for purposes of assessing such
segments performance. UDRs chief operating decision maker is comprised of several members of its
executive management team who use several
generally accepted industry financial measures to assess the performance of the business for
our reportable operating segments.
25
UDR owns and operates multifamily apartment communities throughout the United States that
generate rental and other property related income through the leasing of apartment homes to a
diverse base of tenants. The primary financial measures for UDRs apartment communities are rental
income and net operating income (NOI). Rental income represents gross market rent less
adjustments for concessions, vacancy loss and bad debt. NOI is defined as total revenues less
direct property operating expenses. UDRs chief operating decision maker utilizes NOI as the key
measure of segment profit or loss.
UDRs two reportable segments are same communities and non-mature/other communities:
|
|
|
Same communities represent those communities acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to
January 1, 2009, and held as of March 31, 2010. A comparison of operating results from the
prior year is meaningful as these communities were owned and had stabilized occupancy and
operating expenses as of the beginning of the prior year, there is no plan to conduct
substantial redevelopment activities, and the community is not held for disposition within
the current year. A community is considered to have stabilized occupancy once it achieves
90% occupancy for at least three consecutive months. |
|
|
|
Non-mature/other communities represent those communities that were acquired or developed
in 2008, 2009 or 2010, sold properties, redevelopment properties, properties classified as
real estate held for disposition, condominium conversion properties, joint venture
properties, properties managed by third parties and the non-apartment components of mixed
use properties. |
Management evaluates the performance of each of our apartment communities on a same community
and non-mature/other basis, as well as individually and geographically. This is consistent with the
aggregation criteria under GAAP as each of our apartment communities generally has similar economic
characteristics, facilities, services, and tenants. Therefore, the Companys reportable segments
have been aggregated by geography in a manner identical to that which is provided to the chief
operating decision maker.
All revenues are from external customers and no single tenant or related group of tenants
contributed 10% or more of UDRs total revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009.
26
The accounting policies applicable to the operating segments described above are the same as
those described in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies. The following table details rental
income and NOI for UDRs reportable segments for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
and reconciles NOI to loss from continuing operations per the Consolidated Statements of Operations
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable apartment home segment rental income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
$ |
56,410 |
|
|
$ |
59,495 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
37,688 |
|
|
|
37,741 |
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
28,872 |
|
|
|
29,728 |
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
11,301 |
|
|
|
11,558 |
|
Non-Mature communities/Other |
|
|
17,358 |
|
|
|
12,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated
rental income |
|
$ |
151,629 |
|
|
$ |
150,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable apartment home segment NOI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
$ |
38,711 |
|
|
$ |
42,110 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
25,247 |
|
|
|
25,632 |
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
18,130 |
|
|
|
18,579 |
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
6,634 |
|
|
|
6,514 |
|
Non-Mature communities/Other |
|
|
9,301 |
|
|
|
6,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated NOI |
|
|
98,023 |
|
|
|
99,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-property income |
|
|
3,320 |
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
Property management |
|
|
(4,170 |
) |
|
|
(4,142 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(1,485 |
) |
|
|
(1,654 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(72,207 |
) |
|
|
(68,985 |
) |
Interest, net |
|
|
(36,866 |
) |
|
|
(30,692 |
) |
Hurricane related expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(9,575 |
) |
|
|
(9,456 |
) |
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
|
|
(1,394 |
) |
Loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
(717 |
) |
Tax expense for the TRS |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(24,985 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table details the assets of UDRs reportable segments as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Reportable apartment home segment assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same communities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
$ |
2,407,611 |
|
|
$ |
2,404,218 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
1,259,936 |
|
|
|
1,263,755 |
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
914,309 |
|
|
|
911,973 |
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
419,530 |
|
|
|
418,303 |
|
Non-mature communities/Other |
|
|
1,353,027 |
|
|
|
1,316,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
6,354,413 |
|
|
|
6,315,047 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(1,416,057 |
) |
|
|
(1,351,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets net book value |
|
|
4,938,356 |
|
|
|
4,963,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
19,920 |
|
|
|
5,985 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
37,992 |
|
|
|
37,650 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
8,642 |
|
|
|
8,879 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
26,710 |
|
|
|
26,601 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
|
7,800 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
13,241 |
|
|
|
14,126 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
63,055 |
|
|
|
67,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets |
|
$ |
5,115,716 |
|
|
$ |
5,132,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures related to our same communities totaled $8.4 million and $13.3 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Capital expenditures related to
our non-mature/other communities totaled $456,000 and $2.0 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Markets included in the above geographic segments are as follows:
|
i. |
|
Western Orange County, San Francisco, Monterey Peninsula, Los Angeles, Seattle, San
Diego, Inland Empire, Sacramento and Portland |
|
ii. |
|
Mid-Atlantic Metropolitan DC, Baltimore, Richmond, Norfolk, and Other Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
iii. |
|
Southeastern Tampa, Orlando, Nashville, Jacksonville, and Other Florida |
|
|
iv. |
|
Southwestern Dallas, Phoenix, Austin, and Houston |
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
This Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking
statements include, without limitation, statements concerning property acquisitions and
dispositions, development activity and capital expenditures, capital raising activities, rent
growth, occupancy, and rental expense growth. Words such as expects, anticipates, intends,
plans, believes, seeks, estimates, and variations of such words and similar expressions are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such statements involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, unanticipated
adverse business developments affecting us, or our properties, adverse changes in the real estate
markets and general and local economies and business conditions. Although we believe that the
assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of the
assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore such statements included in this Report may not
prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking
statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a
representation by us or any other person that the results or conditions described in such
statements or our objectives and plans will be achieved.
The following factors, among others, could cause our future results to differ materially from
those expressed in the forward-looking statements:
|
|
general economic conditions, |
|
|
unfavorable changes in apartment market and economic conditions that could adversely affect occupancy
levels and rental rates, |
|
|
the failure of acquisitions to achieve anticipated results,
|
28
|
|
possible difficulty in selling apartment communities, |
|
|
competitive factors that may limit our ability to lease apartment homes or increase or maintain rents, |
|
|
insufficient cash flow that could affect our debt financing and create refinancing risk, |
|
|
failure to generate sufficient revenue, which could impair our debt service payments and distributions to
stockholders, |
|
|
development and construction risks that may impact our profitability, |
|
|
potential damage from natural disasters, including hurricanes and other weather-related events, which
could result in substantial costs to us, |
|
|
risks from extraordinary losses for which we may not have insurance or adequate reserves, |
|
|
uninsured losses due to insurance deductibles, self-insurance retention, uninsured claims or casualties,
or losses in excess of applicable coverage, |
|
|
delays in completing developments and lease-ups on schedule, |
|
|
our failure to succeed in new markets, |
|
|
changing interest rates, which could increase interest costs and affect the market price of our securities, |
|
|
potential liability for environmental contamination, which could result in substantial costs to us, |
|
|
the imposition of federal taxes if we fail to qualify as a REIT under the Code in any taxable year, |
|
|
our internal control over financial reporting may not be considered effective which could result in a loss
of investor confidence in our financial reports, and in turn have an adverse effect on our stock price,
and |
|
|
changes in real estate laws, tax laws and other laws affecting our business. |
A discussion of these and other factors affecting our business and prospects is set forth
below in Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors. We encourage investors to review these risk factors.
Business Overview
We are a real estate investment trust, or REIT, that owns, acquires, renovates, develops, and
manages apartment communities nationwide. We were formed in 1972 as a Virginia corporation. In June
2003, we changed our state of incorporation from Virginia to Maryland. Our subsidiaries include two
operating partnerships, Heritage Communities L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and United
Dominion Realty, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. Unless the context otherwise requires, all
references in this Report to we, us, our, the Company, or UDR refer collectively to UDR,
Inc., its subsidiaries and its consolidated joint ventures.
At March 31, 2010, our consolidated real estate portfolio included 167 communities with 46,357
apartment homes and our total real estate portfolio, inclusive of our unconsolidated communities,
included an additional 10 communities with 3,992 apartment homes.
29
The following table summarizes our market information by major geographic markets as of
March 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Total Income |
|
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
Apartment |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Physical |
|
|
per Occupied |
|
Same Communities |
|
Communities |
|
|
Homes |
|
|
Value |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
Home (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Co, CA |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
4,363 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
$ |
802,601 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
% |
|
$ |
1,466 |
|
San Francisco, CA |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,727 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
402,701 |
|
|
|
96.4 |
% |
|
|
1,886 |
|
Seattle, WA |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
302,994 |
|
|
|
96.8 |
% |
|
|
1,159 |
|
Monterey Peninsula, CA |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
151,231 |
|
|
|
93.5 |
% |
|
|
1,044 |
|
Los Angeles, CA |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
288,307 |
|
|
|
96.6 |
% |
|
|
1,529 |
|
San Diego, CA |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
173,708 |
|
|
|
95.5 |
% |
|
|
1,320 |
|
Inland Empire, CA |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
149,712 |
|
|
|
95.3 |
% |
|
|
1,211 |
|
Portland, OR |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
68,849 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
% |
|
|
936 |
|
Sacramento, CA |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
67,508 |
|
|
|
94.2 |
% |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metropolitan DC |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3,765 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
667,358 |
|
|
|
96.6 |
% |
|
|
1,508 |
|
Baltimore, MD |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2,121 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
249,433 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
% |
|
|
1,240 |
|
Richmond, VA |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
182,279 |
|
|
|
95.8 |
% |
|
|
1,009 |
|
Norfolk VA |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
83,277 |
|
|
|
95.3 |
% |
|
|
943 |
|
Other Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
77,589 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
% |
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeastern Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tampa, FL |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3,278 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
251,164 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
% |
|
|
915 |
|
Orlando, FL |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2,796 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
218,621 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
% |
|
|
900 |
|
Nashville, TN |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,260 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
178,005 |
|
|
|
96.3 |
% |
|
|
833 |
|
Jacksonville, FL |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,857 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
155,287 |
|
|
|
95.3 |
% |
|
|
814 |
|
Other Florida |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
111,232 |
|
|
|
95.3 |
% |
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southwestern Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas, TX |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
266,970 |
|
|
|
96.0 |
% |
|
|
947 |
|
Phoenix, AZ |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
70,897 |
|
|
|
95.3 |
% |
|
|
847 |
|
Austin, TX |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
59,957 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
% |
|
|
1,081 |
|
Houston, TX |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
21,706 |
|
|
|
90.8 |
% |
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Average Same Communities |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
40,848 |
|
|
|
78.7 |
% |
|
|
5,001,386 |
|
|
|
95.8 |
% |
|
$ |
1,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non Matures, Commercial Properties & Other |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
4,905 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
1,113,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Held for Investment |
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
45,753 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
% |
|
|
6,115,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Under Development (b) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
239,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Owned |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
46,357 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
6,354,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accumulated Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,416,057 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Owned, Net of Accumulated
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,938,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total Income per Occupied Home represents total monthly revenues per weighted average number
of apartment homes occupied. |
|
(b) |
|
The Company is currently developing four wholly-owned communities with a total of 1,575
apartment homes of which 971 have not yet been completed. |
30
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to meet present and future financial obligations either through
operating cash flows, the sale of properties, and the issuance of debt and equity. Both the
coordination of asset and liability maturities and effective capital management are important to
the maintenance of liquidity. Our primary source of liquidity is our cash flow from operations as
determined by rental rates, occupancy levels, and operating expenses related to our portfolio of
apartment homes and borrowings under credit agreements. We routinely use our unsecured credit
facility to temporarily fund certain investing and financing activities prior to arranging for
longer-term financing or the issuance of equity or debt securities. During the past several years,
proceeds from the sale of real estate have been used for both investing and financing activities as
we repositioned our portfolio.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by
operations and borrowings under credit agreements. We expect to meet certain long-term liquidity
requirements such as scheduled debt maturities, the repayment of financing on development
activities, and potential property acquisitions, through secured and unsecured borrowings, the
issuance of debt or equity securities, and the disposition of properties. We believe that our net
cash provided by operations and borrowings under credit agreements will continue to be adequate to
meet both operating requirements and the payment of dividends by the Company in accordance with
REIT requirements. Likewise, the budgeted expenditures for improvements and renovations of certain
properties are expected to be funded from property operations, borrowings under credit agreements,
and the issuance of debt or equity securities.
We have a shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
SEC which provides for the issuance of an indeterminate amount of common stock, preferred stock,
guarantees of debt securities, warrants, subscription rights, purchase contracts and units to
facilitate future financing activities in the public capital markets. Access to capital markets is
dependent on market conditions at the time of issuance.
On September 15, 2009, the Company entered into an equity distribution agreement under which
the Company may offer and sell up to 15.0 million shares of its common stock over time to or
through its sales agents. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we sold 4,358,753 shares of
common stock through this program for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $74.8 million at a
weighted average price per share of $17.16. Aggregate net proceeds from such sales, after deducting
related expenses, including commissions paid to the sales agents of approximately $1.5 million,
were approximately $73.3 million.
On December 7, 2009, the Company entered into an amended and restated distribution agreement
with respect to the issue and sale by the Company from time to time of its Medium-Term Notes,
Series A Due Nine Months or More From Date of Issue. In February 2010, the Company issued $150
million of 5.25% senior unsecured medium-term notes under the amended and restated distribution
agreement dated December 7, 2009. These notes were priced at 99.46% of the principal amount at
issuance and had a discount of $783,000 at March 31, 2010.
Future Capital Needs
Future development expenditures are expected to be funded with proceeds from construction
loans, through joint ventures, unsecured or secured credit facilities, proceeds from the issuance
of equity or debt securities, the sale of properties and to a lesser extent, with cash flows
provided by operating activities. Acquisition activity in strategic markets is expected to be
largely financed by the reinvestment of proceeds from the sale of properties, through the issuance
of equity or debt securities, the issuance of operating partnership units, and the assumption or
placement of secured and/or unsecured debt.
During the remainder of 2010, we have approximately $165.1 million of secured debt and no
unsecured debt maturing and we anticipate repaying that debt with proceeds from borrowings under
our secured or unsecured credit facilities, the issuance of equity or debt securities, and by
exercising extension rights with respect to secured debt of $151.2 million.
31
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our critical accounting policies are those having the most impact on the reporting of our
financial condition and results and those requiring significant judgments and estimates. These
policies include those related to (1) capital expenditures, (2) impairment of long-lived assets,
and (3) real estate investment properties. Based on the Companys repositioning initiative,
management deemed our policy surrounding real estate sales to be a critical accounting policy.
Our other critical accounting policies are described in more detail in the section entitled
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in UDRs
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the SEC on February 25,
2010. There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies from those
reported in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2010. With respect to these critical
accounting policies, we believe that the application of judgments and assessments is consistently
applied and produces financial information that fairly depicts the results of operations for all
periods presented.
Statements of Cash Flow
The following discussion explains the changes in net cash provided by operating activities and
net cash provided by/(used in) investing and financing activities that are presented in our
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Operating Activities
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, our net cash flow provided by operating activities
was $41.5 million compared to $71.6 million for the comparable period in 2009. The decrease in cash
flow from operating activities is primarily due to changes in operating assets and liabilities.
Investing Activities
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, net cash used in investing activities was $57.4
million compared to $99.2 million for the comparable period in 2009. The change is primarily driven
by a reduction in development expenditures and the purchase of marketable securities in 2009
partially offset by the payment of $16.1 million to buy out a joint venture partner, all of which
are discussed in further detail throughout this Report.
Acquisitions
We did not have any acquisitions during the three months ended March 31, 2010 Our long-term
strategic plan is to achieve greater operating efficiencies by investing in fewer, more
concentrated markets. As a result, we have been seeking to expand our interests in communities
located in California, Metropolitan D.C., Texas and the Washington State markets over the past
years. Prospectively, we plan to channel new investments into those markets we believe will provide
the best investment returns. Markets will be targeted based upon defined criteria including
favorable job formation, low single-family home affordability and favorable demand/supply ratio for
multifamily housing.
Capital Expenditures
In conformity with GAAP, we capitalize those expenditures that materially enhance the value of
an existing asset or substantially extend the useful life of an existing asset. Expenditures
necessary to maintain an existing property in ordinary operating condition are expensed as
incurred.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, $8.8 million or $199 per home was spent on
recurring capital expenditures. These include revenue enhancing capital expenditures, kitchen and
bath upgrades, and other extensive exterior/interior upgrades, turnover related expenditures for
floor coverings and appliances, other recurring capital expenditures such as exterior paint, roofs,
siding, parking lots, and asset preservation capital expenditures. Total aggregated capital
expenditures, which include recurring capital expenditures, of $13.5 million or $306 per home was
spent on all of our communities, excluding development and commercial properties, for the three
months ended March 31, 2010. In addition, major renovations totaled $4.7 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010.
32
The following table outlines capital expenditures and repair and maintenance costs for all of
our communities, excluding real estate under development, condominium conversions and commercial
properties, for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
(per home) |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Revenue enhancing improvements |
|
$ |
3,052 |
|
|
$ |
7,989 |
|
|
|
-61.8 |
% |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
|
-62.5 |
% |
Turnover capital expenditures |
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
2,111 |
|
|
|
-8.4 |
% |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
-10.2 |
% |
Asset preservation expenditures |
|
|
3,812 |
|
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recurring capital expenditures |
|
|
8,797 |
|
|
|
13,670 |
|
|
|
-35.6 |
% |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
-36.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Major renovations |
|
|
4,747 |
|
|
|
4,529 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
13,544 |
|
|
$ |
18,199 |
|
|
|
-25.6 |
% |
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
$ |
419 |
|
|
|
-27.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repair and maintenance expense |
|
$ |
7,477 |
|
|
$ |
7,018 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average stabilized home count |
|
|
44,270 |
|
|
|
43,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will continue to selectively add revenue enhancing improvements which we believe will
provide a return on investment substantially in excess of our cost of capital. Recurring capital
expenditures during 2010 are currently expected to be approximately $1,000 per home.
Development
At March 31, 2010, our development pipeline for wholly-owned communities totaled 1,575 homes
with a budget of $261.5 million in which we have a carrying value of $239.4 million. We anticipate
the completion of these communities during 2010.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we invested approximately $28.6 million in
development projects, a decrease of $25.0 million from our 2009 level of $53.6 million. We also
completed development of one community held by a joint venture with 274 apartment homes and retail
space with costs of $120.1 million as of March 31, 2010.
Consolidated Joint Ventures
UDR is a partner with an unaffiliated third party in a joint venture (989 Elements) which
owns and operates a 23-story, 166 home high-rise apartment community in the central business
district of Bellevue, Washington. On December 30, 2009, UDR entered into an agreement with our
partner to purchase its 49% interest in 989 Elements for $7.7 million. Concurrently, our partner
resigned as managing member and appointed UDR as managing member. In addition, our partner
relinquished its voting rights and approval rights and its ability to substantively participate in
the decision-making process of the joint venture resulting in the consolidation of the joint
venture. The joint venture assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value. The fair value of
the assets was $55.0 million ($54.8 million of real estate owned and $200,000 of current assets)
and the fair value of liabilities was $34.1 million ($33.4 million of a construction loan, net of
fair market value adjustment of $1.6 million and $700,000 of current liabilities) at the
consolidation date. On December 31, 2009, the Company repaid the outstanding balance of $35.0
million on the construction loan held by 989 Elements. In March 2010, the Company paid $7.7
million and acquired our partners 49% interest in the joint venture. At closing of the agreement
and at March 31, 2010, the Companys interest in 989 Elements was 98%.
33
UDR is a partner with an unaffiliated third party in a joint venture (Elements Too) which
owns and operates a 274 home apartment community in the central business district of Bellevue,
Washington. Construction began in the fourth quarter of 2006 and was completed in the first
quarter of 2010. On October 16, 2009, our partner resigned as managing member and appointed UDR as
managing member. In addition, our partner relinquished its voting rights and approval rights and
its ability to substantively participate in the decision-making process of the joint venture
resulting in the consolidation of the joint venture. The joint venture assets and liabilities were
recorded at fair value.
Prior to consolidation, our equity investment in Elements Too was $24.4 million (net of an
$11.0 million equity loss discussed below) at October 16, 2009. The fair value of the assets was
$100.3 million ($99.5 million of real estate owned and $814,000 of current assets) and the fair
value of liabilities was $75.6 million ($70.5 million of a construction loan, $917,000 of a
derivative instrument, and $4.2 million of current liabilities). On December 30, 2009, UDR entered
into an agreement with our partner to purchase its 49% interest in Elements Too for $3.2 million.
In March 2010, the Company paid the outstanding balance of $3.2 million and acquired our partners
49% interest in the joint venture. The joint ventures activities and accounts are included in the
Companys consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and
consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company repaid the outstanding balance of $70.5
million on the construction loan held by Elements Too.
UDR is a partner with an unaffiliated third party in a joint venture (Bellevue) which owns
an operating retail site in Bellevue, Washington. The Company initially planned to develop a 430
home high rise apartment building with ground floor retail on an existing operating retail center.
However, during the year ended December 31, 2009, the joint venture decided to continue to operate
the retail property as opposed to developing a high rise apartment building on the site. On
December 30, 2009, UDR entered into an agreement with our partner to purchase its 49% interest in
Bellevue for $5.2 million. In addition, our partner resigned as managing member and appointed UDR
as managing member. Concurrent with its resignation, our partner relinquished its voting rights and
approval rights and its ability to substantively participate in the decision-making process of the
joint venture resulting in the consolidation of the joint venture at fair value. Prior to
consolidation, our equity investment in Bellevue was $5.0 million (net of a $5.0 million equity
loss discussed below). The fair value of the assets was $33.0 million ($32.8 million of real estate
owned and $211,000 of current assets) and the fair value of liabilities was $23.0 million ($22.3
million of a mortgage payable, $506,000 of a derivative instrument, and $213,000 of current
liabilities). In March 2010, the Company paid $5.2 million and acquired our partners 49% interest
in the joint venture. At closing of the agreement and at March 31, 2010, the Companys interest in
Bellevue was 98%.
For additional information regarding these joint ventures, see Note 5, Joint Ventures, in
the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
In August 2009, UDR and an unaffiliated third party, Kuwait Finance House, formed a jointed
venture for the investment of up to $450.0 million in multifamily properties located in key, high
barrier to entry markets. The partners will contribute equity of $180.0 million of which the
Companys maximum equity will be 30% or $54.0 million when fully invested. At closing and at March
31 2010, the Company owned 30%. Our investment at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $382,000
and $242,000, respectively. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the joint venture did not own
any multifamily properties.
In November 2007, UDR and an unaffiliated third party formed a joint venture which owns and
operates various properties located in Texas. UDR contributed cash and property equal to 20% of
the fair value of the properties. The unaffiliated member contributed cash equal to 80% of the
fair value of the properties comprising the joint venture, which was then used to purchase the nine
operating properties from UDR. Our initial investment was $20.4 million. Our investment at March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $12.9 million and $13.9 million, respectively.
For additional information regarding these joint ventures, see Note 5, Joint Ventures, in
the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report.
Disposition of Investments
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we did not dispose of any communities. We plan
to continue to pursue our strategy of exiting markets where long-term growth prospects are limited
and redeploying capital into markets we believe will provide the best investment returns.
34
Financing Activities
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, our net cash provided by financing activities was
$29.8 million compared to $52.1 million for the comparable period of 2009.
The following significant financing activities occurred during the three months ended March
31, 2010:
|
|
|
repaid $72.4 million of secured debt and $50.0 million of maturing medium-term unsecured
notes. The $72.4 million of secured debt includes $70.5 million for a maturing
construction loan held by one of our consolidated joint ventures, repayment of $684,000 of
credit facilities and $1.2 million of mortgage payments; |
|
|
|
|
net repayments of $68.3 million were applied toward the Companys $600 million revolving
credit facility; |
|
|
|
|
received proceeds of $28.1 million from the issuance of secured debt. The $28.1 million
includes $9.8 million in variable rate mortgages, $7.0 million in fixed rate mortgages, and
$11.3 million in credit facilities; |
|
|
|
|
in December 2009, the Company entered into an amended and restated distribution
agreement with respect to the issue and sale by the Company from time to time of its
Medium-Term Notes, Series A Due Nine Months or More From Date of Issue. In February 2010,
the Company issued $150 million of 5.25% senior unsecured medium-term notes under the
amended and restated distribution agreement dated December 7, 2009. These notes were priced
at 99.46% of the principal amount at issuance and had a discount of $783,000 at March 31,
2010; and |
|
|
|
|
in September 2009, the Company initiated an At the Market equity distribution program
pursuant to which we may sell up to 15 million shares of common stock from time to time to
or through sales agents, by means of ordinary brokers transactions on the New York Stock
Exchange at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, or as otherwise agreed with the
applicable agent. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we sold 4,358,753 shares
of common stock through this program for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $74.8
million at a weighted average price per share of $17.16. Aggregate net proceeds from such
sales, after deducting related expenses, including commissions paid to the sales agents of
approximately $1.5 million, were approximately $73.3 million. |
Credit Facilities
As of March 31, 2010, we have secured revolving credit facilities with Fannie Mae with an
aggregate commitment of $1.4 billion with $1.2 billion outstanding. The Fannie Mae credit
facilities are for an initial term of 10 years, bear interest at floating and fixed rates, and
certain variable rate facilities can be extended for an additional five years at our option. We
have $949.3 million of the funded balance fixed at a weighted average interest rate of 5.4% and the
remaining balance on these facilities is currently at a weighted average variable rate of 1.6%.
We have a $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility that matures on July 26, 2012.
Under certain circumstances, we may increase the $600 million credit facility to $750 million.
Based on our current credit rating, the $600 million credit facility carries an interest rate equal
to LIBOR plus 47.5 basis points. In addition, the unsecured credit facility contains a provision
that allows us to bid up to 50% of the commitment and we can bid out the entire unsecured credit
facility once per quarter so long as we maintain an investment grade rating. As of March 31, 2010,
we had $121.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the credit facility leaving $479.0 million of
unused capacity (excluding $11.3 million of letters of credit at March 31, 2010).
The Fannie Mae credit facility and the bank revolving credit facility are subject to customary
financial covenants and limitations.
35
Derivative Instruments
As part of UDRs overall interest rate risk management strategy, we use derivatives as a means
to fix the interest rates of variable rate debt obligations or to hedge anticipated financing
transactions. UDRs derivative transactions used for interest rate risk management includes
interest rate swaps with indexes that relate to the pricing of specific financial instruments of
UDR. We believe that we have appropriately controlled our interest rate risk through the use of
derivative instruments so that there will not be any material unintended effect on consolidated
earnings. Derivative contracts did not have a material impact on the results of operations during
the three months ended March 31, 2010 (see Note 10- Derivatives and Hedging Activity in Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report).
Funds from Operations
Funds from operations, or FFO, is defined as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP),
excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable property, plus real estate depreciation and
amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We compute
FFO for all periods presented in accordance with the recommendations set forth by the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) April 1, 2002 White Paper. We consider FFO
in evaluating property acquisitions and our operating performance, and believe that FFO should be
considered along with, but not as an alternative to, net income and cash flow as a measure of our
activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. FFO does not represent cash
generated from operating activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs.
Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes
that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values
instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and
analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use
historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a
supplemental measure of REIT operating performance and defines FFO as net income (computed in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States), excluding gains (or
losses) from sales of depreciable property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after
adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. The use of FFO, combined with the
required presentations, has been fundamentally beneficial, improving the understanding of operating
results of REITs among the investing public and making comparisons of REIT operating results more
meaningful. We generally consider FFO to be a useful measure for reviewing our comparative
operating and financial performance (although FFO should be reviewed in conjunction with net income
which remains the primary measure of performance) because by excluding gains or losses related to
sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and excluding real estate asset
depreciation and amortization, FFO can help one compare the operating performance of a Companys
real estate between periods or as compared to different companies. We believe that FFO is the best
measure of economic profitability for real estate investment trusts.
36
The following table outlines our FFO calculation and reconciliation to GAAP for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to UDR, Inc. |
|
$ |
(24,056 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to preferred stockholders |
|
|
(2,379 |
) |
|
|
(2,800 |
) |
Real estate depreciation and amortization, including discontinued operations |
|
|
72,207 |
|
|
|
68,985 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
(970 |
) |
|
|
(794 |
) |
Real estate depreciation and amortization on unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
1,143 |
|
Net loss on the sale of depreciable property in discontinued operations,
excluding RE3 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations (FFO) basic |
|
$ |
45,852 |
|
|
$ |
54,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution to preferred stockholders Series E (Convertible) |
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations diluted |
|
$ |
46,783 |
|
|
$ |
55,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and OP Units outstanding basic |
|
|
162,107 |
|
|
|
152,031 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares, OP Units, and common stock
equivalents outstanding diluted |
|
|
166,657 |
|
|
|
155,085 |
|
In the computation of diluted FFO, OP Units, unvested restricted stock, stock options, and the
shares of Series E Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock are dilutive; therefore, they are
included in the diluted share count. The effect of the conversion of the Series E Out-Performance
Partnership Shares (the Series E Out-Performance Program terminated on December 31, 2009) are
dilutive for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and is included in the diluted share count.
RE3 is our subsidiary that focuses on development, land entitlement and short-term
hold investments. RE3 tax benefits and gain on sales, net of taxes, is defined as net
sales proceeds less a tax provision and the gross investment basis of the asset before accumulated
depreciation. We consider FFO with RE3 tax benefits and gain on sales, net of taxes, to
be a meaningful supplemental measure of performance because the short-term use of funds produce a
profit that differs from the traditional long-term investment in real estate for REITs.
37
The following table is our reconciliation of FFO share information to weighted average common
shares outstanding, basic and diluted, reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and OP units
outstanding basic |
|
|
162,107 |
|
|
|
152,031 |
|
Weighted average number of OP units outstanding |
|
|
(5,976 |
) |
|
|
(7,855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
basic per the Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|
|
156,131 |
|
|
|
144,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares, OP units, and
common stock equivalents outstanding diluted |
|
|
166,657 |
|
|
|
155,085 |
|
Weighted average number of OP units outstanding |
|
|
(5,976 |
) |
|
|
(7,855 |
) |
Weighted average incremental shares from assumed conversion
of stock options |
|
|
(1,353 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
Weighted average incremental shares from unvested restricted stock |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Series E preferred shares outstanding |
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
|
(3,036 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding diluted
per the Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|
|
156,131 |
|
|
|
144,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO also does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP,
and therefore should not be considered an alternative to net cash flows from operating activities,
as determined by generally accepted accounting principles, as a measure of liquidity. Additionally,
it is not necessarily indicative of cash availability to fund cash needs. A presentation of cash
flow metrics based on GAAP is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
41,510 |
|
|
$ |
71,557 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
$ |
(57,369 |
) |
|
$ |
(99,215 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
$ |
29,794 |
|
|
$ |
52,050 |
|
Results of Operations
The following discussion includes the results of both continuing and discontinued operations
for the periods presented.
Net Loss Attributable to Common Stockholders
Net loss attributable to common stockholders was $26.4 million ($0.17 per diluted share) for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to net loss attributable to common stockholders
of $15.4 million ($0.11 per diluted share) for the comparable period in the prior year. The
increase in net loss attributable to common stockholders for the three months ended March 31, 2010
resulted primarily from the following items, all of which are discussed in further detail elsewhere
within this Report:
|
|
|
a decrease in our net operating income; |
|
|
|
|
an increase in depreciation expense primarily due to the Companys acquisition of
operating properties and the completion of redevelopment and development communities in
2008 and 2009; |
38
|
|
|
a decrease in the recognition of net gain on debt extinguishment related to unsecured
debt repurchase activity in 2009; and |
|
|
|
|
a decrease in other income primarily due to a decrease in interest income offset by an
increase in recoveries from real estate tax accruals. |
The increase to our net loss attributable to common stockholders was partially offset by a
decrease in interest expense.
Apartment Community Operations
Our net income is primarily generated from the operation of our apartment communities. The
following table summarizes the operating performance of our total apartment portfolio which
excludes commercial operating income and expense for each of the periods presented (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property rental income |
|
$ |
149,945 |
|
|
$ |
148,762 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
Property operating expense (a) |
|
|
(52,707 |
) |
|
|
(50,363 |
) |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property net operating income |
|
$ |
97,238 |
|
|
$ |
98,399 |
|
|
|
-1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes depreciation, amortization, and property management expenses. |
The following table is our reconciliation of property NOI to net loss attributable to UDR as
reflected, for both continuing and discontinued operations, for the periods presented (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property net operating income |
|
$ |
97,238 |
|
|
$ |
98,399 |
|
Other net operating income |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
Non-property income, net |
|
|
3,320 |
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
Hurricane related expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
Real estate depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(72,207 |
) |
|
|
(68,985 |
) |
Interest, net |
|
|
(36,866 |
) |
|
|
(30,692 |
) |
General and administrative and property management |
|
|
(13,745 |
) |
|
|
(13,598 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(1,485 |
) |
|
|
(1,654 |
) |
Other depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
|
|
(1,394 |
) |
Loss from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
(717 |
) |
Tax expense for taxable REIT subsidiary |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
Net loss on sale of depreciable property |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to UDR |
|
$ |
(24,056 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Communities
Our same community properties (those acquired, developed, and stabilized prior to January 1,
2009 and held on March 31, 2010) consisted of 40,848 apartment homes and provided 91% of our total
NOI for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
39
NOI for our same community properties decreased 4.4% or $4.1 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease in property NOI was
primarily attributable to a 3.1% or $4.3 million decrease in property rental income, which was
partially offset by a 0.3% or $138,000 decrease in operating expenses. The decrease in revenues
was primarily driven by a 5.1% or $7.1 million decrease in rental rates which was offset by a 41.2%
or $439,000 decrease in rental concessions, a 26.9% or $1.8 million decrease in vacancy loss, a
39.1% or $341,000 decrease in bad debt, and an 12.0% or $667,000 increase in reimbursement income.
Physical occupancy increased 1.1% to 95.8% and total monthly income per occupied home decreased $50
to $1,144.
The decrease in property operating expenses was primarily driven by a 6.1% or $936,000
decrease in real estate taxes partially offset by a 14.3% or $299,000 increase in insurance, and a
4.7% or $312,000 increase in repairs and maintenance primarily due to snow removal costs in the
Mid-Atlantic region.
As a result of the percentage changes in property rental income and property operating
expenses, the operating margin (property net operating income divided by property rental income)
decreased to 66.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to 67.0% for the
comparable period in 2009.
Non-Mature Communities
The remaining $8.5 million or 9% of our NOI during the three months ended March 31, 2010, was
generated from communities that we classify as non-mature communities. UDRs non-mature
communities consist of communities that do not meet the criteria to be included in same
communities, which includes communities developed or acquired, redevelopment properties, sold
properties, non-apartment components of mixed use properties, properties classified as real estate
held for disposition and condominium properties. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we
recognized NOI for our developments of $2.6 million, acquired communities of $1.5 million, and
redeveloped properties of $2.9 million.
Other Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, significant amounts reflected in other income
include: interest income and discount amortization from an interest in a convertible debt security,
a recovery from real estate tax accruals, and fees earned for both recurring and non-recurring
items related to the Companys joint ventures. Other income for the three months ended March 31,
2009 includes interest income on a note receivable and excludes the recovery from real estate tax
accruals.
Real Estate Depreciation and Amortization
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, real estate depreciation and amortization in
continuing operations increased 4.7% or $3.2 million as compared to the comparable period in 2009.
The increase in depreciation and amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is
primarily the result of the consolidation of certain joint ventures assets in the fourth quarter of
2009, development completions during 2010 and 2009, and additional capital expenditures. As part of
the Companys acquisition activity a portion of the purchase price is allocated to intangible
assets and are typically amortized over a period of less than one year.
Interest Expense
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, interest expense in continuing operations increased
20.1% or $6.2 million as compared to the comparable period in 2009. This increase is primarily due
to the recognition of a $7.1 million gain from the repurchase of unsecured debt securities during
the three months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease in the gain was partially offset by a reduction
in interest expense of $610,000, which was primarily due to the slight decrease in the weighted
average interest rate from 4.5% in 2009 to 4.4% in 2010.
40
General and Administrative
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, general and administrative expenses increased 1.3%
or $119,000 as compared to the comparable period in 2009. The increase was due to a number of
factors, none of which were significant.
Inflation
We believe that the direct effects of inflation on our operations have been immaterial. While
the impact of inflation primarily impacts our results through wage pressures, utilities and
material costs, substantially all of our leases are for a term of one year or less, which generally
enables us to compensate for any inflationary effects by increasing rents on our apartment homes.
Although an extreme escalation in energy and food costs could have a negative impact on our
residents and their ability to absorb rent increases, we do not believe this has had a material
impact on our results for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any other off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to
have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition,
revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources
that are material.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to interest rate changes associated with our unsecured credit facility and
other variable rate debt as well as refinancing risk on our fixed rate debt. UDRs involvement with
derivative financial instruments is limited and we do not expect to use them for trading or other
speculative purposes. UDR uses derivative instruments solely to manage its exposure to interest
rates.
See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 under the heading
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for a more complete
discussion of our interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities. As of March 31, 2010, our market
risk has not changed materially from the amounts reported on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of March 31, 2010, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Our disclosure controls and
procedures are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in
our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Based on this evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in
our periodic SEC reports. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer
concluded that during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, there has been no change in our internal
control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over
financial reporting is designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of our financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design
will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how
remote. However, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective under circumstances where our disclosure controls
and procedures should reasonably be expected to operate effectively.
41
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is a party to various claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course
of business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims and litigation, individually or
in the aggregate, will have a material averse effect on our business, financial position or results
of operations.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
There are many factors that affect our business and our results of operations, some of which
are beyond our control. The following is a description of important factors that may cause our
actual results of operations in future periods to differ materially from those currently expected
or discussed in forward-looking statements set forth in this report relating to our financial
results, operations and business prospects. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation
to update any such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on
which it is made.
Risks Related to Our Real Estate Investments and Our Operations
Unfavorable Apartment Market and Economic Conditions Could Adversely Affect Occupancy Levels,
Rental Revenues and the Value of Our Real Estate Assets. Unfavorable market conditions in the areas
in which we operate and unfavorable economic conditions generally may significantly affect our
occupancy levels, our rental rates and collections, the value of the properties and our ability to
strategically acquire or dispose of apartment communities on economically favorable terms. Some of
our major expenses, including mortgage payments and real estate taxes, generally do not decline
when related rents decline. We would expect that declines in our occupancy levels, rental revenues
and/or the values of our apartment communities would cause us to have less cash available to pay
our indebtedness and to distribute to our stockholders, which could adversely affect our financial
condition and the market value of our securities. Factors that may affect our occupancy levels, our
rental revenues, and/or the value of our properties include the following, among others:
|
|
|
downturns in the national, regional and local economic conditions, particularly
increases in unemployment; |
|
|
|
|
declines in mortgage interest rates, making alternative housing more affordable; |
|
|
|
|
government or builder incentives which enable first time homebuyers to put little or no
money down, making alternative housing options more attractive; |
|
|
|
|
local real estate market conditions, including oversupply of, or reduced demand for,
apartment homes; |
|
|
|
|
declines in the financial condition of our tenants, which may make it more difficult
for us to collect rents from some tenants; |
|
|
|
|
changes in market rental rates; |
|
|
|
|
the timing and costs associated with property improvements, repairs or renovations; |
|
|
|
|
declines in household formation; and |
|
|
|
|
rent control or stabilization laws, or other laws regulating rental housing, which
could prevent us from raising rents to offset increases in operating costs. |
42
We Are Subject to Certain Risks Associated with Selling Apartment Communities, Which Could
Limit Our Operational and Financial Flexibility. We have periodically disposed of apartment
communities that no longer meet our strategic objectives, but adverse market conditions may make it
difficult to sell apartment communities like the ones we own, and purchasers may not be willing to
pay prices acceptable to us. These conditions may limit our ability to dispose of properties and to
change our portfolio promptly in order to meet our strategic objectives, which may in turn have a
materially adverse effect on our financial condition and the market value of our securities. We are
also subject to the following risks in connection with sales of our apartment communities:
|
|
|
a significant portion of the proceeds from our overall property sales may be held by
intermediaries in order for some sales to qualify as like-kind exchanges under Section 1031
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, so that any related
capital gain can be deferred for federal income tax purposes. As a result, we may not have
immediate access to all of the cash flow generated from our property sales; |
|
|
|
|
federal tax laws limit our ability to profit on the sale of communities that we have
owned for less than two years, and this limitation may prevent us from selling communities
when market conditions are favorable. |
Competition Could Limit Our Ability to Lease Apartment Homes or Increase or Maintain Rents.
Our apartment communities compete with numerous housing alternatives in attracting residents,
including other apartment communities, condominiums and single-family rental homes, as well as
owner occupied single-and multi-family homes. Competitive housing in a particular area could
adversely affect our ability to lease apartment homes and increase or maintain rents.
We May Not Realize the Anticipated Benefits of Past or Future Acquisitions, and the Failure to
Integrate Acquired Communities and New Personnel Successfully Could Create Inefficiencies. We have
selectively acquired in the past, and if presented with attractive opportunities we intend to
selectively acquire in the future, apartment communities that meet our investment criteria. Our
acquisition activities and their success are subject to the following risks:
|
|
|
we may be unable to obtain financing for acquisitions on favorable terms or at all; |
|
|
|
|
even if we enter into an acquisition agreement for an apartment community, we may be
unable to complete the acquisition after incurring certain acquisition-related costs; |
|
|
|
|
an acquired apartment community may fail to perform as we expected in analyzing our
investment, or a significant exposure related to the acquired property may go undetected
during our due diligence procedures; |
|
|
|
|
when we acquire an apartment community, we may invest additional amounts in it with the
intention of increasing profitability, and these additional investments may not produce the
anticipated improvements in profitability; and |
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate acquired apartment communities
and new personnel into our existing operations, and the failure to successfully integrate
such apartment communities or personnel will result in inefficiencies that could adversely
affect our expected return on our investments and our overall profitability. |
We do not expect to acquire apartment communities at the rate we have in prior years, which
may limit our growth and have a material adverse effect on our business and the market value of our
securities. In the past, other real estate investors, including insurance companies, pension and
investment funds, developer partnerships, investment companies and other public and private
apartment REITs, have competed with us to acquire existing properties and to develop new
properties, and such competition in the future may make it more difficult for us to pursue
attractive investment opportunities on favorable terms, which could adversely affect growth.
Development and Construction Risks Could Impact Our Profitability. In the past we have
selectively pursued the development and construction of apartment communities, and we intend to do
so in the future as appropriate opportunities arise. Development activities have been, and in the
future may be, conducted through wholly owned affiliated companies or through joint ventures with
unaffiliated parties. Our development and construction activities are subject to the following
risks:
|
|
|
we may be unable to obtain construction financing for development activities under
favorable terms, including but not limited to interest rates, maturity dates and/or loan to
value ratios, or at all which could cause us to delay or even abandon potential
developments; |
43
|
|
|
we may be unable to obtain, or face delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, land-use,
building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations, which could
result in increased development costs, could delay initial occupancy dates for all or a
portion of a development community, and could require us to abandon our activities entirely
with respect to a project for which we are unable to obtain permits or authorizations; |
|
|
|
|
yields may be less than anticipated as a result of delays in completing projects, costs
that exceed budget and/or higher than expected concessions for lease up and lower rents
than pro forma; |
|
|
|
|
if we are unable to find joint venture partners to help fund the development of a
community or otherwise obtain acceptable financing for the developments, our development
capacity may be limited; |
|
|
|
|
we may abandon development opportunities that we have already begun to explore, and we
may fail to recover expenses already incurred in connection with exploring such
opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to complete construction and lease-up of a community on schedule, or
incur development or construction costs that exceed our original estimates, and we may be
unable to charge rents that would compensate for any increase in such costs; |
|
|
|
|
occupancy rates and rents at a newly developed community may fluctuate depending on a
number of factors, including market and economic conditions, preventing us from meeting our
profitability goals for that community; and |
|
|
|
|
when we sell to third parties communities or properties that we developed or renovated,
we may be subject to warranty or construction defect claims that are uninsured or exceed
the limits of our insurance. |
In some cases in the past, the costs of upgrading acquired communities exceeded our original
estimates. We may experience similar cost increases in the future. Our inability to charge rents
that will be sufficient to offset the effects of any increases in these costs may impair our
profitability.
Some Potential Losses May Not Be Adequately Covered by Insurance. We have a comprehensive
insurance program covering our property and operating activities. We believe the policy
specifications and insured limits of these policies are adequate and appropriate. There are,
however, certain types of extraordinary losses which may not be adequately covered under our
insurance program. In addition, we will sustain losses due to insurance deductibles, self-insured
retention, uninsured claims or casualties, or losses in excess of applicable coverage.
If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could lose all or a
portion of the capital we have invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenue
from the property. In such an event, we might nevertheless remain obligated for any mortgage debt
or other financial obligations related to the property. Material losses in excess of insurance
proceeds may occur in the future. If one or more of our significant properties were to experience a
catastrophic loss, it could seriously disrupt our operations, delay revenue and result in large
expenses to repair or rebuild the property. Such events could adversely affect our cash flow and
ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Failure to Succeed in New Markets May Limit Our Growth. We have acquired in the past, and we
may acquire in the future if appropriate opportunities arise, apartment communities that are
outside of our existing markets. Entering into new markets may expose us to a variety of risks, and
we may not be able to operate successfully in new markets. These risks include, among others:
|
|
|
inability to accurately evaluate local apartment market conditions and local economies; |
|
|
|
|
inability to hire and retain key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
lack of familiarity with local governmental and permitting procedures; and |
|
|
|
|
inability to achieve budgeted financial results. |
44
Risk of Inflation/Deflation. Substantial inflationary or deflationary pressures could have a
negative effect on rental rates and property operating expenses. Although inflation has not
materially impacted our operations in the recent past, increased inflation could have a more
pronounced negative impact on our debt interest and general and administrative expenses, as these
costs could increase at a rate higher than our rental rates.
Potential Liability for Environmental Contamination Could Result in Substantial Costs. Under
various federal, state and local environmental laws, as a current or former owner or operator of
real estate, we could be required to investigate and remediate the effects of contamination of
currently or formerly owned real estate by hazardous or toxic substances, often regardless of our
knowledge of or responsibility for the contamination and solely by virtue of our current or former
ownership or operation of the real estate. In addition, we could be held liable to a governmental
authority or to third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred
in connection with the contamination. These costs could be substantial, and in many cases
environmental laws create liens in favor of governmental authorities to secure their payment. The
presence of such substances or a failure to properly remediate any resulting contamination could
materially and adversely affect our ability to borrow against, sell or rent an affected property.
Property Ownership Through Joint Ventures May Limit Our Ability to Act Exclusively in Our
Interest. We have in the past and may in the future develop and acquire properties in joint
ventures with other persons or entities when we believe circumstances warrant the use of such
structures. If we use such a structure, we could become engaged in a dispute with one or more of
our joint venture partners that might affect our ability to operate a jointly-owned property.
Moreover, joint venture partners may have business, economic or other objectives that are
inconsistent with our objectives, including objectives that relate to the appropriate timing and
terms of any sale or refinancing of a property. In some instances, joint venture partners may have
competing interests in our markets that could create conflicts of interest.
Compliance or Failure to Comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 or Other
Safety Regulations and Requirements Could Result in Substantial Costs. The Americans with
Disabilities Act generally requires that public buildings, including our properties, be made
accessible to disabled persons. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of fines by the
federal government or the award of damages to private litigants. From time to time claims may be
asserted against us with respect to some of our properties under this Act. If, under the Americans
with Disabilities Act, we are required to make substantial alterations and capital expenditures in
one or more of our properties, including the removal of access barriers, it could adversely affect
our financial condition and results of operations.
Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such
as state and local fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements,
we could incur fines or private damage awards. We do not know whether existing requirements will
change or whether compliance with future requirements will require significant unanticipated
expenditures that will affect our cash flow and results of operations.
Real Estate Tax and Other Laws. Generally we do not directly pass through costs resulting from
compliance with or changes in real estate tax laws to residential property tenants. We also do not
generally pass through increases in income, service or other taxes, to tenants under leases. These
costs may adversely affect net operating income and the ability to make distributions to
stockholders. Similarly, compliance with or changes in (i) laws increasing the potential liability
for environmental conditions existing on properties or the restrictions on discharges or other
conditions or (ii) rent control or rent stabilization laws or other laws regulating housing, such
as the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, may result in
significant unanticipated expenditures, which would adversely affect funds from operations and the
ability to make distributions to stockholders.
Risk of Damage from Catastrophic Weather Events. Certain of our communities are located in the
general vicinity of active earthquake faults, mudslides and fires, and others where there are
hurricanes, tornadoes or risks of other inclement weather. The adverse weather events could cause
damage or losses that may be greater than insured levels. In the event of a loss in excess of
insured limits, we could lose our capital invested in the affected community, as well as
anticipated future revenue from that community. We would also continue to be obligated to repay any
mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the community. Any such loss could materially
and adversely affect our business and our financial condition and results of operations.
45
Actual or Threatened Terrorist Attacks May Have an Adverse Effect on Our Business and
Operating Results and Could Decrease the Value of Our Assets. Actual or threatened terrorist
attacks and other acts of violence or war
could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. Attacks that
directly impact one or more of our apartment communities could significantly affect our ability to
operate those communities and thereby impair our ability to achieve our expected results. Further,
our insurance coverage may not cover all losses caused by a terrorist attack. In addition, the
adverse effects that such violent acts and threats of future attacks could have on the U.S. economy
could similarly have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Any Weaknesses Identified in Our Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Could Have an
Adverse Effect on Our Stock Price. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to
evaluate and report on our internal control over financial reporting. If we identify one or more
material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we could lose investor
confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which in turn could have an
adverse effect on our stock price.
Our Success Depends on Our Senior Management. Our success depends upon the retention of our
senior management, whose continued service in not guaranteed. We may not be able to find qualified
replacements for the individuals who make up our senior management if their services should no
longer be available to us. The loss of services of one or more members of our senior management
team could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We are Unable to Predict the Effect of Current Governmental Proposals. The current United
States administration and Congress have enacted, or called for consideration of, proposals relating
to a variety of issues, including with respect to health care, financial regulation reform, climate
control, executive compensation and others. We believe that these and other potential proposals
could have varying degrees of impact on us ranging from minimal to material. At this time, we are
unable to predict with certainty what level of impact any such proposal could have on us.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness and Financings
Insufficient Cash Flow Could Affect Our Debt Financing and Create Refinancing Risk. We are
subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our operating
income and cash flow will be insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest, or
could restrict our borrowing capacity under our line of credit due to debt covenant restraints.
Sufficient cash flow may not be available to make all required principal payments and still satisfy
our distribution requirements to maintain our status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and
the full limits of our line of credit may not be available to us if our operating performance falls
outside the constraints of our debt covenants. Additionally, we are likely to need to refinance
substantially all of our outstanding debt as it matures. We may not be able to refinance existing
debt, or the terms of any refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of the existing debt,
which could create pressures to sell assets or to issue additional equity when we would otherwise
not choose to do so. In addition, our failure to comply with our debt covenants could result in a
requirement to repay our indebtedness prior to its maturity, which could have an adverse effect on
our cash flow and increase our financing costs.
Failure to Generate Sufficient Revenue Could Impair Debt Service Payments and Distributions to
Stockholders. If our apartment communities do not generate sufficient net rental income to meet
rental expenses, our ability to make required payments of interest and principal on our debt
securities and to pay distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected. The following
factors, among others, may affect the net rental income generated by our apartment communities:
|
|
|
the national and local economies; |
|
|
|
|
local real estate market conditions, such as an oversupply of apartment homes; |
|
|
|
|
tenants perceptions of the safety, convenience, and attractiveness of our communities
and the neighborhoods where they are located; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to provide adequate management, maintenance and insurance; |
|
|
|
|
rental expenses, including real estate taxes and utilities; |
46
|
|
|
changes in interest rates and the availability of financing; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in tax and housing laws, including the enactment of rent control laws or other
laws regulating multi-family housing. |
Expenses associated with our investment in an apartment community, such as debt service, real
estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a
reduction in rental income from that community. If a community is mortgaged to secure payment of
debt and we are unable to make the mortgage payments, we could sustain a loss as a result of
foreclosure on the community or the exercise of other remedies by the mortgage holder.
Debt Level May Be Increased. Our current debt policy does not contain any limitations on the
level of debt that we may incur, although our ability to incur debt is limited by covenants in our
bank and other credit agreements. We manage our debt to be in compliance with these debt covenants,
but subject to compliance with these covenants, we may increase the amount of our debt at any time
without a concurrent improvement in our ability to service the additional debt.
Financing May Not Be Available and Could Be Dilutive. Our ability to execute our business
strategy depends on our access to an appropriate blend of debt financing, including unsecured lines
of credit and other forms of secured and unsecured debt, and equity financing, including common and
preferred equity. We and other companies in the real estate industry have experienced limited
availability of financing from time to time. If we issue additional equity securities to finance
developments and acquisitions instead of incurring debt, the interests of our existing stockholders
could be diluted.
Financing Could be Impacted by Negative Capital Market Conditions. Recently, domestic
financial markets have experienced unusual volatility and uncertainty. While this condition has
occurred most visibly within the subprime mortgage lending sector of the credit market, liquidity
has tightened in overall domestic financial markets, including the investment grade debt and equity
capital markets. Consequently, there is greater risk that the financial institutions we do business
with could experience disruptions that would negatively affect our ability to obtain financing.
Disruptions in Financial Markets May Adversely Impact Availability and Cost of Credit, Impact
Our Tenant Base, and Have other Adverse Effects on Us and the Market Price of Our Stock. Our
ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance debt obligations will depend on our operating
and financial performance, which in turn is subject to prevailing economic conditions and to
financial, business and other factors beyond our control. The United States stock and credit
markets have recently experienced significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity
disruptions, which have caused market prices of many stocks to fluctuate substantially and the
spreads on prospective debt financings to widen considerably. These circumstances have materially
impacted liquidity in the financial markets, making terms for certain financings less attractive,
and in some cases have resulted in the unavailability of financing. Continued uncertainty in the
stock and credit markets may negatively impact our ability to access additional financing for
acquisitions, development of our properties and other purposes at reasonable terms, which may
negatively affect our business. Additionally, due to this uncertainty, we may be unable to
refinance our existing indebtedness or the terms of any refinancing may not be as favorable as the
terms of our existing indebtedness. If we are not successful in refinancing this debt when it
becomes due, we may be forced to dispose of properties on disadvantageous terms, which might
adversely affect our ability to service other debt and to meet our other obligations. A prolonged
downturn in the financial markets may cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially less
attractive financing, and may require us to adjust our business plan accordingly. These events also
may make it more difficult or costly for us to raise capital through the issuance of our common or
preferred stock. The disruptions in the financial markets have had and may continue to have a
material adverse effect on the market value of our common shares and other adverse effects on us
and our business.
Prospective buyers of our properties may also experience difficulty in obtaining debt
financing which might make it more difficult for us to sell properties at acceptable pricing
levels. Current tightening of credit in financial markets and increasing unemployment may also
adversely affect the ability of tenants to meet their lease obligations and for us to continue
increasing rents on a prospective basis. Disruptions in the credit and financial markets may also
have other adverse effects on us and the overall economy.
47
The Soundness of Financial Institutions Could Adversely Affect Us. We have relationships with
many financial institutions, including lenders under our credit facilities, and, from time to time,
we execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry. As a result,
defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, financial institutions or the financial services
industry generally, could result in losses or defaults by these institutions. In the event that the
volatility of the financial markets adversely affects these financial institutions or
counterparties, we or other parties to the transactions with us may be unable to complete
transactions as intended, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Changing Interest Rates Could Increase Interest Costs and Adversely Affect Our Cash Flow and
the Market Price of Our Securities. We currently have, and expect to incur in the future,
interest-bearing debt at rates that vary with market interest rates. As of March 31, 2010, we had
approximately $861.5 million of variable rate indebtedness outstanding, which constitutes
approximately 25.2% of our total outstanding indebtedness as of such date. An increase in interest
rates would increase our interest expenses and increase the costs of refinancing existing
indebtedness and of issuing new debt. Accordingly, higher interest rates could adversely affect
cash flow and our ability to service our debt and to make distributions to security holders. The
effect of prolonged interest rate increases could negatively impact our ability to make
acquisitions and develop properties. In addition, an increase in market interest rates may lead our
security holders to demand a higher annual yield, which could adversely affect the market price of
our common and preferred stock and debt securities.
Interest Rate Hedging Contracts May Be Ineffective and May Result in Material Charges. From
time to time when we anticipate issuing debt securities, we may seek to limit our exposure to
fluctuations in interest rates during the period prior to the pricing of the securities by entering
into interest rate hedging contracts. We may do this to increase the predictability of our
financing costs. Also, from time to time we may rely on interest rate hedging contracts to limit
our exposure under variable rate debt to unfavorable changes in market interest rates. If the terms
of new debt securities are not within the parameters of, or market interest rates fall below that
which we incur under a particular interest rate hedging contract, the contract is ineffective.
Furthermore, the settlement of interest rate hedging contracts has involved and may in the future
involve material charges.
Risks Related to Tax Laws
We Would Incur Adverse Tax Consequences if We Fail to Qualify as a REIT. We have elected to be
taxed as a REIT under the Code. Our qualification as a REIT requires us to satisfy numerous
requirements, some on an annual and quarterly basis, established under highly technical and complex
Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations, and
involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our
control. We intend that our current organization and method of operation enable us to continue to
qualify as a REIT, but we may not so qualify or we may not be able to remain so qualified in the
future. In addition, U.S. federal income tax laws governing REITs and other corporations and the
administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended at any time, potentially with
retroactive effect. Future legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court
decisions could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT or adversely affect our
stockholders.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to federal income tax
(including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate
rates, and would not be allowed to deduct dividends paid to our stockholders in computing our
taxable income. Also, unless the Internal Revenue Service granted us relief under certain statutory
provisions, we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the two taxable years following
the year in which we first failed to qualify. The additional tax liability from the failure to
qualify as a REIT would reduce or eliminate the amount of cash available for investment or
distribution to our stockholders. This would likely have a significant adverse effect on the value
of our securities and our ability to raise additional capital. In addition, we would no longer be
required to make distributions to our stockholders. Even if we continue to qualify as a REIT, we
will continue to be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and property.
48
REITs May Pay a Portion of Dividends in Common Stock. In December 2009, the Internal Revenue
Service issued Revenue Procedure 2010-12, which expanded previously issued temporary guidance
relating to certain stock distributions made by publicly traded REITs to satisfy their tax-related
distribution requirements. This expanded
temporary guidance is intended to permit REITs to limit cash distributions in order to
maintain liquidity during the current downturn in economic conditions. Under this expanded
guidance, for stock dividends declared on or after January 1, 2008 and before December 31, 2012,
with respect to a taxable year ending on or before December 31, 2011, the Internal Revenue Service
will treat a distribution of stock by a publicly traded REIT, pursuant to certain stockholder
elections to receive either stock or cash, as a taxable distribution of property, provided that,
among other conditions, (i) the total amount of cash available for distribution is not less than
10% of the aggregate declared distribution, and (ii) if too many stockholders elect to receive
cash, each stockholder electing to receive cash will receive a pro rata amount of cash
corresponding to its respective entitlement under the declaration, but in no event will any such
electing stockholder receive less than 10% of the stockholders entire entitlement in money. The
amount of such stock distribution will generally be treated as equal to the amount of cash that
could have been received instead. If we pay a portion of our dividends in shares of our common
stock pursuant to this temporary guidance, our stockholders may receive less cash than they
received in distributions in prior years and the market value of our securities may decline.
We May Conduct a Portion of Our Business Through Taxable REIT Subsidiaries, Which are Subject
to Certain Tax Risks. We have established several taxable REIT subsidiaries. Despite our
qualification as a REIT, our taxable REIT subsidiaries must pay income tax on their taxable income.
In addition, we must comply with various tests to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income
tax purposes, and our income from and investments in our taxable REIT subsidiaries generally do not
constitute permissible income and investments for these tests. While we will attempt to ensure that
our dealings with our taxable REIT subsidiaries will not adversely affect our REIT qualification,
we cannot provide assurance that we will successfully achieve that result. Furthermore, we may be
subject to a 100% penalty tax, we may jeopardize our ability to retain future gains on real
property sales, or our taxable REIT subsidiaries may be denied deductions, to the extent our
dealings with our taxable REIT subsidiaries are not deemed to be arms length in nature or are
otherwise not respected.
REIT Distribution Requirements Limit Our Available Cash. As a REIT, we are subject to annual
distribution requirements, which limit the amount of cash we retain for other business purposes,
including amounts to fund our growth. We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our net
REIT taxable income, excluding any net capital gain, in order for our distributed earnings not to
be subject to corporate income tax. We intend to make distributions to our stockholders to comply
with the requirements of the Code. However, differences in timing between the recognition of
taxable income and the actual receipt of cash could require us to sell assets or borrow funds on a
short-term or long-term basis to meet the 90% distribution requirement of the Code.
Certain Property Transfers May Generate Prohibited Transaction Income, Resulting in a Penalty
Tax on Gain Attributable to the Transaction. From time to time, we may transfer or otherwise
dispose of some of our properties. Under the Code, any gain resulting from transfers of properties
that we hold as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business
would be treated as income from a prohibited transaction and subject to a 100% penalty tax. Since
we acquire properties for investment purposes, we do not believe that our occasional transfers or
disposals of property are prohibited transactions. However, whether property is held for investment
purposes is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the
particular transaction. The Internal Revenue Service may contend that certain transfers or
disposals of properties by us are prohibited transactions. If the Internal Revenue Service were to
argue successfully that a transfer or disposition of property constituted a prohibited transaction,
then we would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on any gain allocable to us from the prohibited
transaction and we may jeopardize our ability to retain future gains on real property sales. In
addition, income from a prohibited transaction might adversely affect our ability to satisfy the
income tests for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
We Could Face Possible State and Local Tax Audits and Adverse Changes in State and Local Tax
Laws. As discussed in the risk factors above, because we are organized and qualify as a REIT we are
generally not subject to federal income taxes, but we are subject to certain state and local taxes.
From time to time, changes in state and local tax laws or regulations are enacted, which may result
in an increase in our tax liability. A shortfall in tax revenues for states and municipalities in
which we own apartment communities may lead to an increase in the frequency and size of such
changes. If such changes occur, we may be required to pay additional state and local taxes. These
increased tax costs could adversely affect our financial condition and the amount of cash available
for the payment of distributions to our stockholders. In the normal course of business, entities
through which we own real estate may
also become subject to tax audits. If such entities become subject to state or local tax
audits, the ultimate result of such audits could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.
49
Risks Related to Our Organization and Our Shares
Changes in Market Conditions and Volatility of Stock Prices Could Adversely Affect the Market
Price of Our Common Stock. The stock markets, including the New York Stock Exchange, on which we
list our common shares, have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. As a result,
the market price of our common stock could be similarly volatile, and investors in our common stock
may experience a decrease in the value of their shares, including decreases unrelated to our
operating performance or prospects.
The market price per share of our common stock may decline or fluctuate significantly in
response to many factors, including:
|
|
|
general market and economic conditions, |
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results or dividends
or our payment of dividends in shares of our stock, |
|
|
|
|
changes in our funds from operations or earnings estimates, |
|
|
|
|
difficulties or inability to access capital or extend or refinance existing debt, |
|
|
|
|
decreasing (or uncertainty in) real estate valuations, |
|
|
|
|
publication of research reports about us or the real estate industry, |
|
|
|
|
the general reputation of real estate investment trusts and the attractiveness
of their equity securities in comparison to other equity securities (including
securities issued by other real estate companies), |
|
|
|
|
general stock and bond market conditions, including changes in interest rates on
fixed income securities, that may lead prospective purchasers of our stock to
demand a higher annual yield from future dividends, |
|
|
|
|
a change in analyst ratings, |
|
|
|
|
adverse market reaction to any additional debt we incur in the future, |
|
|
|
|
speculation in the press or investment community, |
|
|
|
|
terrorist activity which may adversely affect the markets in which our
securities trade, possibly increasing market volatility and causing the further
erosion of business and consumer confidence and spending, |
|
|
|
|
governmental regulatory action and changes in tax laws, and |
|
|
|
|
the issuance of additional shares of our common stock, or the perception that
such sales might occur, including under our at-the-market equity distribution
program. |
Many of the factors listed above are beyond our control. These factors may cause the market
price of shares of our common stock to decline, regardless of our financial condition, results of
operations, business or our prospects.
We May Change the Dividend Policy for Our Common Stock in the Future. The decision to declare
and pay dividends on our common stock in the future, as well as the timing, amount and composition
of any such future dividends, will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will
depend on our earnings, funds from operations, liquidity, financial condition, capital
requirements, contractual prohibitions or other limitations under our
indebtedness, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code,
state law and such other factors as our board of directors considers relevant. Any change in our
dividend policy could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
50
Maryland Law May Limit the Ability of a Third Party to Acquire Control of Us, Which May Not be
in Our Stockholders Best Interests. Maryland business statutes may limit the ability of a third
party to acquire control of us. As a Maryland corporation, we are subject to various Maryland laws
which may have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire our Company and of increasing the
difficulty of consummating any such offers, even if our acquisition would be in our stockholders
best interests. The Maryland General Corporation Law restricts mergers and other business
combination transactions between us and any person who acquires beneficial ownership of shares of
our stock representing 10% or more of the voting power without our board of directors prior
approval. Any such business combination transaction could not be completed until five years after
the person acquired such voting power, and generally only with the approval of stockholders
representing 80% of all votes entitled to be cast and 66-2/3% of the votes entitled to be cast,
excluding the interested stockholder, or upon payment of a fair price. Maryland law also provides
generally that a person who acquires shares of our equity stock that represents 10% (and certain
higher levels) of the voting power in electing directors will have no voting rights unless approved
by a vote of two-thirds of the shares eligible to vote.
Limitations on Share Ownership and Limitations on the Ability of Our Stockholders to Effect a
Change in Control of Our Company May Prevent Takeovers That are Beneficial to Our Stockholders. One
of the requirements for maintenance of our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax
purposes is that no more than 50% in value of our outstanding capital stock may be owned by five or
fewer individuals, including entities specified in the Code, during the last half of any taxable
year. Our charter contains ownership and transfer restrictions relating to our stock primarily to
assist us in complying with this and other REIT ownership requirements; however, the restrictions
may have the effect of preventing a change of control, which does not threaten REIT status. These
restrictions include a provision that generally limits ownership by any person of more than 9.9% of
the value of our outstanding equity stock, unless our board of directors exempts the person from
such ownership limitation, provided that any such exemption shall not allow the person to exceed
13% of the value of our outstanding equity stock. These provisions may have the effect of delaying,
deferring or preventing someone from taking control of us, even though a change of control might
involve a premium price for our stockholders or might otherwise be in our stockholders best
interests.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
51
Repurchase of Equity Securities
In February 2006, our Board of Directors authorized a 10 million share repurchase program. In
January 2008, our Board of Directors authorized a new 15 million share repurchase program. Under
the two share repurchase programs, UDR may repurchase shares of our common stock in open market
purchases, block purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The following table
sets forth information regarding our common stock repurchases during the quarter ended March 31,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
that May Yet |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Be Purchased |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
or Programs (1) |
|
Beginning Balance |
|
|
9,967,490 |
|
|
$ |
22.00 |
|
|
|
9,967,490 |
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
January 1, 2010 through January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
February 1, 2010 through February 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
March 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010 |
|
|
9,967,490 |
|
|
$ |
22.00 |
|
|
|
9,967,490 |
|
|
|
15,032,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This number reflects the amount of shares that were available for purchase under our 10
million share repurchase program in effect on December 31, 2007 and our 15 million share
repurchase program announced on January 31, 2008. |
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
Item 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
There is no other information required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, that was not previously disclosed in a Form 8-K.
Item 6. EXHIBITS
The exhibits filed or furnished with this report are set forth in the Exhibit Index.
52
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UDR, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 4, 2010
|
|
/s/ David L. Messenger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David L. Messenger |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(duly authorized officer, principal financial officer
and chief accounting officer) |
|
|
53
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Description of the 2010-2012 Long-Term Incentive Program for
Senior Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated
February 26, 2010 and filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 4, 2010, Commission File No. 1-10524). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Summary of 2010 Non-Employee Director Compensation Program
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 8, 2010 and filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 12,
2010, Commission File No. 1-10524). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. |