e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-32938
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Bermuda
|
|
98-0481737 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
27 Richmond Road, Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda
(Address of Principal Executive Offices and Zip Code)
(441) 278-5400
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of outstanding common shares, par value $0.03 per share, of Allied World Assurance
Company Holdings, Ltd as of August 2, 2010 was 48,873,660.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity investments available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2010: $2,602,000;
2009: $4,260,844) |
|
$ |
2,755,934 |
|
|
$ |
4,427,072 |
|
Fixed maturity investments trading, at fair value |
|
|
4,275,893 |
|
|
|
2,544,322 |
|
Other invested assets trading, at fair value |
|
|
388,761 |
|
|
|
184,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
7,420,588 |
|
|
|
7,156,263 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
442,689 |
|
|
|
292,188 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
101,206 |
|
|
|
87,563 |
|
Insurance balances receivable |
|
|
552,330 |
|
|
|
395,621 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance |
|
|
202,107 |
|
|
|
186,610 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
932,435 |
|
|
|
919,991 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
46,105 |
|
|
|
53,046 |
|
Net deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
103,286 |
|
|
|
87,821 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
268,376 |
|
|
|
268,376 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
58,576 |
|
|
|
60,359 |
|
Balances receivable on sale of investments |
|
|
24,318 |
|
|
|
55,854 |
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
|
14,170 |
|
|
|
21,895 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
48,182 |
|
|
|
67,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
10,214,368 |
|
|
$ |
9,653,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
4,920,435 |
|
|
$ |
4,761,772 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
1,069,956 |
|
|
|
928,619 |
|
Reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
137,790 |
|
|
|
102,837 |
|
Balances due on purchases of investments |
|
|
50,425 |
|
|
|
55,670 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
498,984 |
|
|
|
498,919 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
68,235 |
|
|
|
92,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
6,745,825 |
|
|
$ |
6,439,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, par value $0.03 per share (2010: 50,488,342; 2009: 49,734,487 shares issued
and 2010: 49,407,301; 2009: 49,734,487 shares outstanding) |
|
$ |
1,515 |
|
|
$ |
1,492 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,378,262 |
|
|
|
1,359,934 |
|
Treasury shares, at cost (2010: 1,081,041; 2009: nil) |
|
|
(49,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income: net unrealized gains on investments, net of tax |
|
|
138,245 |
|
|
|
149,849 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,999,610 |
|
|
|
1,702,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
$ |
3,468,543 |
|
|
$ |
3,213,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
10,214,368 |
|
|
$ |
9,653,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
-1-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
493,847 |
|
|
$ |
492,782 |
|
|
$ |
998,010 |
|
|
$ |
972,379 |
|
Premiums ceded |
|
|
(124,052 |
) |
|
|
(131,344 |
) |
|
|
(194,923 |
) |
|
|
(205,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
369,795 |
|
|
|
361,438 |
|
|
|
803,087 |
|
|
|
766,476 |
|
Change in unearned premiums |
|
|
(30,871 |
) |
|
|
(27,770 |
) |
|
|
(125,839 |
) |
|
|
(108,836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
338,924 |
|
|
|
333,668 |
|
|
|
677,248 |
|
|
|
657,640 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
65,594 |
|
|
|
76,537 |
|
|
|
134,496 |
|
|
|
154,391 |
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
94,933 |
|
|
|
5,093 |
|
|
|
172,420 |
|
|
|
41,695 |
|
Net impairment charges recognized in earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,225 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(58,188 |
) |
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income,
before taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment charges recognized in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,474 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(47,437 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,067 |
|
|
|
410,193 |
|
|
|
984,909 |
|
|
|
807,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
188,722 |
|
|
|
177,719 |
|
|
|
420,876 |
|
|
|
326,216 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
37,938 |
|
|
|
36,963 |
|
|
|
78,722 |
|
|
|
74,091 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
68,089 |
|
|
|
61,495 |
|
|
|
131,552 |
|
|
|
118,860 |
|
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
2,130 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9,531 |
|
|
|
9,522 |
|
|
|
19,059 |
|
|
|
19,969 |
|
Foreign exchange loss (gain) |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
(1,222 |
) |
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,730 |
|
|
|
285,542 |
|
|
|
653,627 |
|
|
|
540,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
194,337 |
|
|
|
124,651 |
|
|
|
331,282 |
|
|
|
266,245 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
10,378 |
|
|
|
10,981 |
|
|
|
13,583 |
|
|
|
21,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
|
183,959 |
|
|
|
113,670 |
|
|
|
317,699 |
|
|
|
245,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on investments arising during the period net of
applicable deferred income tax expense for the three months
2010: $(471); 2009: $(1,822); and six months 2010: $(690); 2009: $(441) |
|
|
63,852 |
|
|
|
140,209 |
|
|
|
101,322 |
|
|
|
76,149 |
|
Portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in
other comprehensive income, net of applicable deferred income tax
for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 nil; 2009: nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,751 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,751 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for net realized investment (gains)
losses included in net income, net of applicable income tax |
|
|
(67,891 |
) |
|
|
7,856 |
|
|
|
(112,926 |
) |
|
|
14,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(4,039 |
) |
|
|
137,314 |
|
|
|
(11,604 |
) |
|
|
79,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
179,920 |
|
|
$ |
250,984 |
|
|
$ |
306,095 |
|
|
$ |
324,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PER SHARE DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
3.66 |
|
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
$ |
6.34 |
|
|
$ |
4.96 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
3.47 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
5.98 |
|
|
$ |
4.79 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
50,222,974 |
|
|
|
49,523,459 |
|
|
|
50,123,945 |
|
|
|
49,386,549 |
|
Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents
outstanding |
|
|
52,974,410 |
|
|
|
51,257,887 |
|
|
|
53,086,708 |
|
|
|
51,215,808 |
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
-2-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,492 |
|
|
$ |
1,359,934 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
149,849 |
|
|
$ |
1,702,020 |
|
|
$ |
3,213,295 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317,699 |
|
|
|
317,699 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,109 |
) |
|
|
(20,109 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses, net of
deferred income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,604 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,604 |
) |
Portion of other-than-temporary
impairment losses recognized in
other comprehensive income, net
of deferred income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,604 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,604 |
) |
Stock compensation |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
18,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,351 |
|
Share repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,515 |
|
|
$ |
1,378,262 |
|
|
$ |
(49,089 |
) |
|
$ |
138,245 |
|
|
$ |
1,999,610 |
|
|
$ |
3,468,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,471 |
|
|
$ |
1,314,785 |
|
|
$ |
105,632 |
|
|
$ |
994,974 |
|
|
$ |
2,416,862 |
|
Cumulative effect adjustment upon
adoption of ASC 320-10-651, net of
deferred taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136,848 |
) |
|
|
136,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,078 |
|
|
|
245,078 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,828 |
) |
|
|
(17,828 |
) |
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,636 |
|
Portion of other-than-temporary
impairment losses recognized in other
comprehensive income, net of deferred
income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,751 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,751 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,885 |
|
Stock compensation |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
17,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,486 |
|
|
$ |
1,332,200 |
|
|
$ |
48,669 |
|
|
$ |
1,359,072 |
|
|
$ |
2,741,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Cumulative effect adjustment reflects adoption of ASC 320-10-65 as of April 1, 2009. |
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
-3-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
317,699 |
|
|
$ |
245,078 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains on sales of investments |
|
|
(113,151 |
) |
|
|
(34,311 |
) |
Mark to market adjustments |
|
|
(59,269 |
) |
|
|
(7,384 |
) |
Net impairment charges recognized in earnings |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
47,437 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
17,454 |
|
|
|
16,560 |
|
Insurance balances receivable |
|
|
(156,709 |
) |
|
|
(73,832 |
) |
Prepaid reinsurance |
|
|
(15,497 |
) |
|
|
(27,531 |
) |
Reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
(12,444 |
) |
|
|
(21,402 |
) |
Accrued investment income |
|
|
6,941 |
|
|
|
(5,980 |
) |
Net deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
(15,465 |
) |
|
|
(10,422 |
) |
Net deferred tax assets |
|
|
8,415 |
|
|
|
(8,783 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
22,318 |
|
|
|
(1,353 |
) |
Reserve for losses and loss expenses |
|
|
158,663 |
|
|
|
136,899 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
141,337 |
|
|
|
136,368 |
|
Reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
34,953 |
|
|
|
37,819 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(23,806 |
) |
|
|
(24,263 |
) |
Other items, net |
|
|
(6,005 |
) |
|
|
(2,518 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
305,602 |
|
|
|
402,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed maturity investments available for sale |
|
|
(113,118 |
) |
|
|
(5,379,219 |
) |
Purchases of fixed maturity investments trading |
|
|
(6,927,637 |
) |
|
|
(234,049 |
) |
Purchases of other invested assets |
|
|
(203,011 |
) |
|
|
(125,376 |
) |
Sales of fixed maturity investments available for sale |
|
|
1,827,800 |
|
|
|
5,297,600 |
|
Sales of fixed maturity investments trading |
|
|
5,344,007 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Sales of other invested assets |
|
|
3,155 |
|
|
|
134,386 |
|
Changes in securities lending collateral received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,026 |
|
Purchases of fixed assets |
|
|
(5,213 |
) |
|
|
(3,072 |
) |
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
(13,643 |
) |
|
|
(8,636 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(87,660 |
) |
|
|
(146,983 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(20,109 |
) |
|
|
(17,828 |
) |
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
3,576 |
|
|
|
2,228 |
|
Share repurchase |
|
|
(49,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of syndicated loan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243,750 |
) |
Changes in securities lending collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177,010 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(65,622 |
) |
|
|
(436,360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on foreign currency cash |
|
|
(1,819 |
) |
|
|
801 |
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
150,501 |
|
|
|
(180,160 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR |
|
|
292,188 |
|
|
|
655,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR |
|
$ |
442,689 |
|
|
$ |
475,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
4,386 |
|
|
$ |
37,878 |
|
Cash paid for interest expense |
|
|
18,750 |
|
|
|
20,365 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
-4-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
1. GENERAL
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd (Holdings) was incorporated in Bermuda on
November 13, 2001. Holdings, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Company),
provides property and casualty insurance and reinsurance on a worldwide basis through operations in
Bermuda, the United States, Europe, Hong Kong and Singapore.
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND CONSOLIDATION
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Holdings
and its subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and with
Article 10 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements reflect all adjustments that are normal and recurring in nature and necessary
for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations as of the end of and for
the periods presented. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily
indicative of the results for a full year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates. The significant estimates reflected in the Companys financial statements
include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
The premium estimates for certain reinsurance agreements, |
|
|
|
|
Recoverability of deferred acquisition costs, |
|
|
|
|
The reserve for outstanding losses and loss expenses, |
|
|
|
|
Valuation of ceded reinsurance recoverables, |
|
|
|
|
Determination of impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, |
|
|
|
|
Valuation of financial instruments, and |
|
|
|
|
Determination of other-than-temporary impairment of investments. |
Inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation and all entities
meeting consolidation requirements have been included in the consolidation. Certain immaterial
reclassifications in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income (consolidated income statements) and consolidated statements of cash flows
and notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been made to prior
years amounts to conform to the current years presentation.
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, including these notes, should be
read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements, and related notes
thereto, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
3. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard
Update (ASU) 2010-06 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASU 2010-06). ASU 2010-06
updated section ASC 820-10 to require a greater level of disaggregated information and more robust
disclosure about valuation techniques and inputs to fair value measurements. ASU 2010-06 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, with the
exception of the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward
of activity in Level 3 fair value measures which are effective for interim and annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2010. See Note 6 Fair Value of Financial Instruments for the
Companys disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments.
In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11 Derivatives and Hedging: Scope Exception Related
to Embedded Credit
-5-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
Derivatives (ASU 2010-11). ASU 2010-11 clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative
that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements, specifically one that is related
only to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. ASU 2010-11 is effective for
interim and annual periods beginning after June 15, 2010. As permitted under the transitional
provisions of ASU 2010-11, effective July 1, 2010 the Company has elected the fair value option for
any investment in a beneficial interest in a securitized asset. As a result, the Company elected
the fair value option for all of its mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities held as of June
30, 2010. On July 1, 2010, the Company reclassified net unrealized gains of $42,402 from
accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. As a result of the fair value
election, any changes in fair value of the mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities will be
recognized in net realized investment gains (losses) on the consolidated income statement. On
July 1, 2010, these investments, which totaled $968,825 as of June 30, 2010, were classified as
fixed maturity investments trading, at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet.
4. INVESTMENTS
a) Available for Sale Securities
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, unrealized losses, other-than-temporary-impairment
charges (OTTI) recorded through other comprehensive income (OCI) and fair value of the
Companys available for sale investments by category as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
OTTI OCI |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and Government agencies |
|
$ |
197,602 |
|
|
$ |
13,662 |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
211,256 |
|
Non-U.S. Government and Government agencies |
|
|
135,790 |
|
|
|
10,055 |
|
|
|
(5,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,606 |
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
145,495 |
|
|
|
14,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,045 |
|
Corporate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial institutions |
|
|
337,266 |
|
|
|
15,609 |
|
|
|
(2,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,497 |
|
Industrials |
|
|
691,159 |
|
|
|
49,728 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
740,878 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
168,265 |
|
|
|
15,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,827 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency residential |
|
|
151,416 |
|
|
|
6,306 |
|
|
|
(6,759 |
) |
|
|
(563 |
) |
|
|
150,400 |
|
Agency residential |
|
|
551,635 |
|
|
|
32,508 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
584,075 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
157,464 |
|
|
|
8,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,179 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
65,908 |
|
|
|
2,345 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity investments, available for sale |
|
$ |
2,602,000 |
|
|
$ |
169,040 |
|
|
$ |
(14,543 |
) |
|
$ |
(563 |
) |
|
$ |
2,755,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and Government agencies |
|
$ |
689,858 |
|
|
$ |
34,831 |
|
|
$ |
(1,389 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
723,300 |
|
Non-U.S. Government and Government agencies |
|
|
271,528 |
|
|
|
13,752 |
|
|
|
(1,590 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
283,690 |
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
210,315 |
|
|
|
17,429 |
|
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,408 |
|
Corporate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial institutions |
|
|
684,386 |
|
|
|
27,695 |
|
|
|
(1,751 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
710,330 |
|
Industrials |
|
|
879,905 |
|
|
|
46,489 |
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
926,210 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
143,773 |
|
|
|
10,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,252 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency residential |
|
|
172,000 |
|
|
|
4,206 |
|
|
|
(11,517 |
) |
|
|
(1,856 |
) |
|
|
162,833 |
|
Agency residential |
|
|
708,652 |
|
|
|
28,882 |
|
|
|
(1,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
736,439 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
406,236 |
|
|
|
6,482 |
|
|
|
(7,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,803 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
94,191 |
|
|
|
3,762 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity investments, available for sale |
|
$ |
4,260,844 |
|
|
$ |
194,007 |
|
|
$ |
(25,923 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,856 |
) |
|
$ |
4,427,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-6-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
b) Trading Securities
Securities accounted for at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the
consolidated income statements by category as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
U.S. Government and Government agencies |
|
$ |
1,558,731 |
|
|
$ |
655,266 |
|
Non-U.S. Government and Government agencies |
|
|
246,180 |
|
|
|
227,310 |
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
88,965 |
|
|
|
15,810 |
|
Corporate debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial institutions |
|
|
687,744 |
|
|
|
590,130 |
|
Industrials |
|
|
359,285 |
|
|
|
191,729 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
69,802 |
|
|
|
11,934 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency residential |
|
|
256,130 |
|
|
|
259,055 |
|
Agency residential |
|
|
377,748 |
|
|
|
139,858 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
29,545 |
|
|
|
18,266 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
601,763 |
|
|
|
434,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity investments, trading |
|
|
4,275,893 |
|
|
|
2,544,322 |
|
Hedge funds |
|
|
319,592 |
|
|
|
184,725 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
69,169 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,664,654 |
|
|
$ |
2,729,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c) Contractual Maturity Dates
The contractual maturity dates of fixed maturity investments (available for sale and trading)
as of June 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
396,310 |
|
|
$ |
399,476 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
3,593,575 |
|
|
|
3,676,074 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
596,166 |
|
|
|
611,326 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
100,233 |
|
|
|
110,940 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
1,523,938 |
|
|
|
1,564,077 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
667,671 |
|
|
|
669,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,877,893 |
|
|
$ |
7,031,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the
right to prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.
d) Other Invested Assets
As of June 30, 2010, the Company held sixteen hedge fund investments with a total fair value
of $319,592, which comprised 4.0% of the total fair value of its investments and cash and cash
equivalents and are summarized as follows by type of investment strategy:
-7-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long |
|
|
Short |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge Fund |
|
Fair Value as of |
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
Exposure(1) |
|
|
Exposure(2) |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
Type |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Commitments |
|
|
(% of funded) |
|
|
(% of funded) |
|
|
Exposure(3) |
|
|
Exposure(4) |
|
Secondary private
equity funds |
|
$ |
17,464 |
|
|
$ |
43,319 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
Distressed |
|
|
68,310 |
|
|
|
42,660 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
Equity long/short |
|
|
76,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
Multi-strategy |
|
|
107,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
142 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
Event driven |
|
|
49,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
142 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
319,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Long exposure represents the ratio of the funds long investments in securities to the funds
equity capital (over 100% may denote explicit borrowing). |
|
(2) |
|
Short exposure represents the ratio of the securities sold short to the funds equity
capital. |
|
(3) |
|
Gross exposure is the addition of the long and short exposures (over 100% may denote explicit
borrowing). |
|
(4) |
|
Net exposure is the subtraction of the short exposure from the long exposure. |
|
|
|
Secondary private equity funds: These funds buy limited partnership interests from
existing limited partners of primary private equity funds. As owners of private equity funds
seek liquidity, they can sell their existing investments, plus any remaining commitment, to
secondary market participants. The Company has invested in two secondary private equity
funds to purchase those primary limited partnership interests. The fair values of the
investments in this class have been estimated using the net asset value per share of the
investments. These funds cannot be redeemed because the investments include restrictions
that do not allow for redemption until termination of the fund. The remaining restriction
period for these funds ranges from seven to eight years. |
|
|
|
|
Distressed funds: In distressed debt investing, managers take positions in the debt of
companies experiencing significant financial difficulties, including bankruptcy, or in
certain positions of the capital structure of structured securities. The manager relies on
the fundamental analysis of these securities, including the claims on the assets and the
likely return to bondholders. The fair values of the funds in this class have been estimated
using the net asset value per share of the funds. The Company has invested in five
distressed funds, four of which (representing approximately 34% of the value of the funds in
this class) are not currently eligible for redemption due to imposed lock-up periods with
remaining periods ranging from eighteen months to seven years. Funds representing
approximately 43% of the value of the funds in this class are currently eligible for
quarterly redemption with a 65-day notification period, subject to redemption limitations.
Funds representing approximately 23% of the value of the funds in this class are currently
eligible for quarterly redemption with a 45-day notification period and redemption fee if
redeemed prior to January 2012. |
|
|
|
|
Equity long/short funds: In equity long/short funds, managers take long positions in
companies they deem to be undervalued and short positions in companies they deem to be
overvalued. Long/short managers may invest in countries, regions or sectors and vary by
their use of leverage and target net long position. The fair values of the funds in this
class have been estimated using the net asset value per share of the funds. The Company has
invested in three equity long/short funds, two of which (representing approximately 69% of
the value of the funds in this class) are not currently eligible for redemption due to
imposed lock-up periods with remaining periods ranging from two to six months, at which time
the funds will be eligible for quarterly redemption with a 60-day notification period. The
third fund, representing approximately 31% of the value of the funds in this class, is
currently eligible for quarterly redemption with a 30-day notification period or monthly
redemption with a 30-day notification period and redemption fee. |
|
|
|
|
Multi-strategy funds: These funds may utilize many strategies employed by specialized
funds including distressed investing, equity long/short, merger arbitrage, convertible
arbitrage, fixed income arbitrage and macro trading. The fair values of the funds in this
class have been estimated using the net asset value per share of the funds. The Company has
invested in four multi-strategy funds. Funds representing approximately 24% of the value of
the funds in this class currently are not eligible for |
-8-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
|
|
|
redemption due to imposed lock-up periods with remaining periods of approximately eight
months. Funds representing approximately 29% of the value of the funds in this class are
currently eligible for quarterly redemption with a 60-day notification period. Funds
representing approximately 23% of the value of the funds in this class are currently eligible
for quarterly redemption with a 45-day notification period and redemption fee if redeemed
prior to December 2010. Funds representing approximately 24% of the value of the funds in this
class are not eligible for redemption due to a seven month lock-up period. |
|
|
|
Event driven funds: Event driven strategies seek to deploy capital into specific
securities whose returns are affected by a specific event that affects the value of one or
more securities of a company. Returns for such securities are linked primarily to the
specific outcome of the events and not by the overall direction of the bond or stock
markets. Examples could include mergers and acquisitions (arbitrage), corporate
restructurings and spin-offs and capital structure arbitrage. The fair values of the funds
in this class have been estimated using the net asset value per share of the funds. The
Company has invested in two event driven funds. Approximately 50% of the value of the funds
is not currently eligible for redemption due to an imposed two year lock-up period. The
remaining 50% of the value of the funds in this class is currently eligible for quarterly
redemption, but is subject to redemption fees and limitations. |
Two of the Companys hedge funds, a multi-strategy fund and an event driven fund, had long
exposure greater than 100% of the funds net asset value (indicating explicit leverage of 122% and
120%, respectively as of June 30, 2010). None of the other funds in which the Company invests have
used explicit leverage as of June 30, 2010.
In addition, the Company has committed $50,000 and $25,000 for two new hedge funds,
respectively.
e) Net Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Fixed maturities and other investments |
|
$ |
67,552 |
|
|
$ |
76,703 |
|
|
$ |
138,650 |
|
|
$ |
155,581 |
|
Other invested assets |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
(3,009 |
) |
|
|
(1,607 |
) |
|
|
(5,563 |
) |
|
|
(3,864 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
65,594 |
|
|
$ |
76,537 |
|
|
$ |
134,496 |
|
|
$ |
154,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f) Components of Realized Gains and Losses
Components of realized gains for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are
summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Gross realized gains on sale of securities |
|
$ |
78,572 |
|
|
$ |
46,618 |
|
|
$ |
130,239 |
|
|
$ |
94,272 |
|
Gross realized losses on sale of securities |
|
|
(6,724 |
) |
|
|
(49,001 |
) |
|
|
(13,130 |
) |
|
|
(59,961 |
) |
Treasury yield hedge |
|
|
(3,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market changes: debt securities trading |
|
|
32,746 |
|
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
60,477 |
|
|
|
(428 |
) |
Mark-to-market changes: hedge funds and equity
securities |
|
|
(5,703 |
) |
|
|
7,904 |
|
|
$ |
(1,208 |
) |
|
|
7,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
$ |
94,933 |
|
|
$ |
5,093 |
|
|
$ |
172,420 |
|
|
$ |
41,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of available for sale securities |
|
$ |
539,449 |
|
|
$ |
1,942,811 |
|
|
$ |
1,846,074 |
|
|
$ |
5,365,294 |
|
Proceeds from sale of trading securities |
|
$ |
4,081,800 |
|
|
$ |
10,717 |
|
|
$ |
5,297,353 |
|
|
$ |
67,405 |
|
The Company recognized a realized loss of $3,958 related to a U.S. treasury yield hedge
transaction that was purchased in May 2010 and terminated in June 2010.
-9-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
g) Pledged Assets
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $391,355 and $323,681, respectively, of cash and
cash equivalents and investments were on deposit with various state or government insurance
departments or pledged in favor of ceding companies in order to comply with relevant insurance
regulations. In addition, the Company has set up trust accounts to meet security requirements for
inter-company reinsurance transactions. These trusts contained assets of $994,455 and $701,843 as
of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and are included in fixed maturity
investments.
The Company also has facilities available for the issuance of letters of credit collateralized
against the Companys investment portfolio. The collateralized portion of these facilities is up to
$1,300,000 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. See Note 7 Debt and Financing Arrangements
for details on the facilities.
The following table shows the Companys trust accounts on deposit, as well as outstanding and
remaining letters of credit facilities, and the collateral committed to support the letters of
credit facilities as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total trust accounts on deposit |
|
$ |
1,385,810 |
|
|
$ |
1,025,524 |
|
Total letters of credit facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citibank Europe plc |
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
Credit Facility |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total letters of credit facilities |
|
|
1,700,000 |
|
|
|
1,700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total letters of credit facilities outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citibank Europe plc |
|
|
765,241 |
|
|
|
794,609 |
|
Credit Facility |
|
|
206,452 |
|
|
|
376,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total letters of credit facilities outstanding |
|
|
971,693 |
|
|
|
1,171,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total letters of credit facilities remaining: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citibank Europe plc |
|
|
134,759 |
|
|
|
105,391 |
|
Credit Facility |
|
|
593,548 |
|
|
|
423,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total letters of credit facilities remaining |
|
|
728,307 |
|
|
|
528,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral committed to support the letter of credit facilities |
|
$ |
1,223,194 |
|
|
$ |
1,208,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trust accounts on deposit includes available for sale securities, trading securities and
cash and cash equivalents. The fair values of the combined total cash and cash equivalents and
investments held under trust were $2,609,004 and $2,233,883 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively. Of the total letters of credit facilities outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, $8,025 and $263,297 was used to meet security requirements for inter-company
transactions and the remaining letter of credit facilities outstanding of $963,668 and $907,970 was
used for third-party ceding companies, respectively. Trust accounts were substituted for
inter-company letters of credit during 2010.
h) Analysis of Unrealized Losses
The Companys primary investment objective is the preservation of capital. Although the
Company has been successful in meeting this objective, shifts in interest rates and credit spreads
affecting valuation can temporarily place some investments in an unrealized loss position.
The following table summarizes the market value of those investments in an unrealized loss
position for periods less than and greater than 12 months as of June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009:
-10-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Gross Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
OTTI OCI |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
OTTI OCI |
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and Government
agencies |
|
$ |
6,769 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
112,349 |
|
|
$ |
(1,367 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Non-U.S. Government and Government
agencies |
|
|
40,871 |
|
|
|
(4,519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,450 |
|
|
|
(1,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
States, municipalities and political
subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,637 |
|
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial institutions |
|
|
15,746 |
|
|
|
(1,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,697 |
|
|
|
(560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Industrials |
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,409 |
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency residential |
|
|
9,615 |
|
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,544 |
|
|
|
(8,797 |
) |
|
|
(1,527 |
) |
Agency residential |
|
|
3,546 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,525 |
|
|
|
(1,057 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,396 |
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
14,301 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,516 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
92,043 |
|
|
$ |
(6,433 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
442,523 |
|
|
$ |
(14,011 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and Government
agencies |
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Non-U.S. Government and Government
agencies |
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
$ |
(721 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial institutions |
|
|
42,685 |
|
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,462 |
|
|
|
(1,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency residential |
|
|
85,978 |
|
|
|
(6,191 |
) |
|
|
(563 |
) |
|
|
27,265 |
|
|
|
(2,720 |
) |
|
|
(329 |
) |
Agency residential |
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,074 |
|
|
|
(7,404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
134,803 |
|
|
$ |
(8,110 |
) |
|
$ |
(563 |
) |
|
$ |
204,405 |
|
|
$ |
(11,912 |
) |
|
$ |
(329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
226,846 |
|
|
$ |
(14,543 |
) |
|
$ |
(563 |
) |
|
$ |
646,928 |
|
|
$ |
(25,923 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,856 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were approximately 64 and 159
securities, respectively, in an unrealized loss position. The gross unrealized loss of $14,543 as
of June 30, 2010 was primarily the result of widening credit spreads related to increases in market
risk premium and reduced market liquidity since the acquisition of these securities. The decrease
in the gross unrealized loss from December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2010 is primarily due to selling
available for sale debt securities and reinvesting proceeds in trading debt securities thereby
reducing unrealized gains/losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income.
i) Other-than-temporary impairment charges
Following the Companys review of the securities in the investment portfolio during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010, nil and one mortgage-backed security, respectively, was
considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired due to the present value of the expected cash
flows being lower than the amortized cost. The $168 of OTTI during the six months ended June 30,
2010 was recognized through earnings due to credit related losses.
For the mortgage-backed security for which OTTI was recognized due to credit loss during
the six months ended June 30, 2010, the significant inputs utilized to determine a credit loss were
the estimated frequency and severity of losses of the underlying mortgages that comprise the
mortgage-backed security. The frequency of losses was measured as the credit default rate, which
includes such factors such as loan-to-value ratios and credit scores of borrowers. The severity of
losses includes such factors as trends in overall housing prices and house prices that are obtained
at foreclosure. The frequency and severity inputs were used in projecting
-11-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
the future cash flows of the mortgage backed security. For the security in which we recognized an
OTTI due to credit loss the credit default rate was 10.3% and the severity rate was 49.0%.
The following table summarizes the amounts related to credit losses on debt securities for
which a portion of the OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income in the consolidated income
statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, and the three months ended June 30,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
For the Six Months |
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
Beginning balance of credit losses |
|
$ |
1,264 |
|
|
$ |
1,096 |
|
|
$ |
7,140 |
|
Additions for credit loss for which OTTI was not previously
recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
3,167 |
|
Reductions for securities sold during the period (realized) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions for OTTI previously recognized due to intent to sell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions resulting from the increase in credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
Reductions resulting from the improvement in expected cash flows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of credit losses |
|
$ |
1,264 |
|
|
$ |
1,264 |
|
|
$ |
12,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following the Companys review of the securities in the investment portfolio during the six
months ended June 30, 2009, seven securities (six mortgage-backed securities and one corporate
bond) were considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired due to the present value of the
expected cash flows being lower than the amortized cost. Of the $58,188 recognized as OTTI, $5,474
was recognized through earnings due to credit related losses, $41,963 was recognized through
earnings for those securities in an unrealized loss position where the Companys investment
managers had the discretion to sell and $10,751 was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
5. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Company uses currency forward contracts to manage currency exposure, which are the only
derivative instruments used for risk management purposes. The U.S. dollar is the Companys
reporting currency and the functional currency of its operating subsidiaries. The Company enters
into insurance and reinsurance contracts where the premiums receivable and losses payable are
denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. In addition, the Company maintains a portion
of its investments and liabilities in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the Canadian
dollar, Euro and British Sterling. For liabilities incurred in currencies other than U.S. dollars,
U.S. dollars are converted to the currency of the loss at the time of claim payment. As a result,
the Company has an exposure to foreign currency risk resulting from fluctuations in exchange rates.
The Company has developed a hedging strategy using currency forward contracts to minimize the
potential loss of value caused by currency fluctuations. These currency forward contracts are not
designated as hedges and accordingly are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets
as a part of other assets or accounts payable and accrued liabilities, with the corresponding
realized and unrealized gains and losses included in foreign exchange loss in the unaudited
condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The fair value of our
currency forward contracts as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was a net payable of $2,216
and $1,650, respectively, and was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet.
6. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. There is a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value
measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon whether the inputs to the valuation of an asset
or liability are observable or unobservable in the market at the measurement date, with quoted
market prices being the highest level (Level 1) and unobservable inputs being the lowest level
(Level 3). A fair value measurement will fall within the level of the hierarchy based on the input
that is significant to determining such measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology that are quoted prices
(unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology other than quoted market prices
(unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs include
quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted |
-12-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
|
|
|
prices for identical assets in markets that are not active and inputs other than quoted prices
that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for
substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology that are unobservable for the asset or
liability. |
The following table shows the fair value of the Companys financial instruments and where in
the fair value hierarchy the fair value measurements are included as of June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurement using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in active |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
markets for |
|
|
Significant other |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Total fair |
|
|
identical assets |
|
|
observable inputs |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
value |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Available for sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and Government agencies |
|
$ |
211,256 |
|
|
$ |
211,256 |
|
|
$ |
145,662 |
|
|
$ |
65,594 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-U.S. Government and Government agencies |
|
|
140,606 |
|
|
|
140,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
160,045 |
|
|
|
160,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt |
|
|
1,275,202 |
|
|
|
1,275,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,275,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
900,654 |
|
|
|
900,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
771,490 |
|
|
|
129,164 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
68,171 |
|
|
|
68,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,087 |
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale fixed maturity investments |
|
|
2,755,934 |
|
|
|
2,755,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and Government agencies |
|
$ |
1,558,731 |
|
|
$ |
1,558,731 |
|
|
$ |
1,431,132 |
|
|
$ |
127,599 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-U.S. Government and Government agencies |
|
|
246,180 |
|
|
|
246,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
88,965 |
|
|
|
88,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt |
|
|
1,116,831 |
|
|
|
1,116,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,116,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
663,423 |
|
|
|
663,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
513,798 |
|
|
|
149,625 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
601,763 |
|
|
|
601,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501,292 |
|
|
|
100,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading fixed maturity investments |
|
|
4,275,893 |
|
|
|
4,275,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity investments |
|
|
7,031,827 |
|
|
|
7,031,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge funds |
|
|
319,592 |
|
|
|
319,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319,592 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
69,169 |
|
|
|
69,169 |
|
|
|
69,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
7,420,588 |
|
|
|
7,420,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
|
498,984 |
|
|
|
547,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to determine the
fair value of financial instruments held as of June 30, 2010.
U.S. Government and U.S. Government agencies: Comprised primarily of bonds issued by the
U.S. treasury, the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the
Federal National Mortgage Association. The fair values of the Companys U.S. government securities
are based on quoted market prices in active markets and are included in the Level 1 fair value
hierarchy. The Company believes the market for U.S. treasury securities is an actively traded
market given the high level of daily trading volume. The fair values of U.S. government agency
securities are priced using the spread above the risk-free yield curve. As the yields for the
risk-free yield curve and the spreads for these securities are observable market inputs, the fair
values of U.S. government agency securities are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Non-U.S. Government and Government agencies: Comprised of fixed income obligations of non-U.S.
governmental entities. The fair values of these securities are based on prices obtained from
international indices and are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
States, municipalities and political subdivisions: Comprised of fixed income obligations of
U.S. domiciled state and municipality entities. The fair values of these securities are based on
prices obtained from the new issue market, and are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
-13-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
Corporate debt: Comprised of bonds issued by corporations that are diversified across a wide
range of issuers and industries. The fair values of corporate bonds that are short-term are priced
using spread above the London Interbank Offered Rate yield curve, and the fair value of corporate
bonds that are long-term are priced using the spread above the risk-free yield curve. The spreads
are sourced from broker-dealers, trade prices and the new issue market. As the significant inputs
used to price corporate bonds are observable market inputs, the fair values of corporate bonds are
included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Mortgage-backed: Primarily comprised of pools of residential and commercial mortgages
originated by both U.S. government agencies (such as the Federal National Mortgage Association) and
non-U.S. government agency originators. The fair values of mortgage-backed securities originated by
U.S. government agencies and non-U.S. government agencies are based on a pricing model that
incorporates prepayment speeds and spreads to determine appropriate average life of mortgage-backed
securities. The spreads are sourced from broker-dealers, trade prices and the new issue market. As
the significant inputs used to price the mortgage-backed securities are observable market inputs,
the fair values of these securities are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy, unless the
significant inputs used to price the mortgage-backed securities are broker-dealer quotes and the
Company is not able to determine if those quotes are based on observable market inputs, in which
case the fair value is included in the Level 3 hierarchy.
Asset-backed: Principally comprised of bonds backed by pools of automobile loan receivables,
home equity loans, credit card receivables and collateralized loan obligations originated by a
variety of financial institutions. The fair values of asset-backed securities are priced using
prepayment speed and spread inputs that are sourced from the new issue market. As the significant
inputs used to price the asset-backed securities are observable market inputs, the fair values of
these securities are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy, unless the significant inputs
used to price the asset-backed securities are broker-dealer quotes and the Company is not able to
determine if those quotes are based on observable market inputs, in which case the fair value is
included in the Level 3 hierarchy.
Hedge funds: Comprised of hedge funds invested in a range of diversified strategies. In
accordance with U.S. GAAP, the fair values of the hedge funds are based on the net asset value of
the funds as reported by the fund manager, which is not considered an observable input, and as
such, the fair values of those hedge funds are included in the Level 3 fair value hierarchy.
Equity securities: The fair value of the equity securities are prices from market exchanges
and therefore included in the Level 1 fair value hierarchy.
Senior notes: The fair value of the senior notes is based on trades as reported in Bloomberg,
which was 109.5% of their principal amount, providing an effective yield of 5.63% as of June 30,
2010. The fair value of the senior notes is included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of financial instruments
using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
-14-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurement using significant |
|
|
|
unobservable inputs (Level 3): |
|
|
|
Hedge funds |
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
Asset-backed |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
$ |
242,135 |
|
|
$ |
233,667 |
|
|
$ |
36,532 |
|
Total realized and unrealized gains included in net income |
|
|
1,742 |
|
|
|
9,703 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Total realized and unrealized losses included in net income |
|
|
(2,906 |
) |
|
|
(6,987 |
) |
|
|
(279 |
) |
Change in unrealized gains included in OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Change in unrealized losses included in OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
78,621 |
|
|
|
96,089 |
|
|
|
28,868 |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,560 |
) |
|
|
(2,058 |
) |
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
|
50,641 |
|
Transfers out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,843 |
) |
|
|
(10,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
319,592 |
|
|
$ |
278,789 |
|
|
$ |
103,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
$ |
120,708 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total gains included in net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized losses |
|
|
(824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of investments |
|
|
5,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases or sales |
|
|
7,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
132,560 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
$ |
184,725 |
|
|
$ |
253,979 |
|
|
$ |
104,871 |
|
Total realized and unrealized gains included in net income |
|
|
6,584 |
|
|
|
18,084 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
Total realized and unrealized losses included in net income |
|
|
(3,386 |
) |
|
|
(7,098 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
Change in unrealized gains included in OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Change in unrealized losses included in OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(447 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Purchases |
|
|
131,669 |
|
|
|
120,943 |
|
|
|
51,181 |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119,228 |
) |
|
|
(5,246 |
) |
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,731 |
|
|
|
50,739 |
|
Transfers out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,259 |
) |
|
|
(98,460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
319,592 |
|
|
$ |
278,789 |
|
|
$ |
103,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
$ |
48,573 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total gains included in net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized losses |
|
|
(2,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of investments |
|
|
7,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases or sales |
|
|
78,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
132,560 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company attempts to verify the significant inputs used by broker-dealers in
determining the fair value of the securities priced by them. If the Company could not obtain
sufficient information to determine if the broker-dealers were using significant observable inputs
such securities have been transferred to Level 3 fair value hierarchy. The Company believes the
prices obtained from the broker-dealers are the best estimate of fair value of the securities being
priced as the broker-dealers are typically involved in the initial pricing of the security and the
Company has compared the price per the broker-dealer to other pricing sources and noted no material
differences.
-15-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company transferred $9,843 and
$41,259 of mortgage-backed securities, respectively, and $10,237 and $98,460 of asset-backed
securities, respectively, from Level 3 to Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The Company
transferred those securities as they no longer utilized broker-dealer quotes and instead used other
pricing sources that have significant observable inputs. The Company recognizes transfers between
levels at the end of the reporting period.
7. DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
On July 21, 2006, the Company issued $500,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.50% Senior Notes
due August 1, 2016 (Senior Notes), with interest on the notes payable on August 1 and February 1
of each year, commencing on February 1, 2007. The Senior Notes were offered by the underwriters at
a price of 99.71% of their principal amount, providing an effective yield to investors of 7.54%.
The Senior Notes can be redeemed by the Company prior to maturity subject to payment of a
make-whole premium. The Company has no current expectations of calling the notes prior to
maturity.
The Company has a collateralized amended letter of credit facility (the Credit Facility)
with Citibank Europe plc. that has been and will continue to be used to issue standby letters of
credit. The Credit Facility was amended in December 2008 to provide the Company with greater
flexibility in the types of securities that are eligible to be posted as collateral and to increase
the maximum aggregate amount available under the Credit Facility from $750,000 to $900,000 on an
uncommitted basis.
In November 2007, the Company entered into an $800,000 five-year senior credit facility (the
Facility) with a syndication of lenders. The Facility consists of a $400,000 secured letter of
credit facility for the issuance of standby letters of credit (the Secured Facility) and a
$400,000 unsecured facility for the making of revolving loans and for the issuance of standby
letters of credit (the Unsecured Facility). Both the Secured Facility and the Unsecured Facility
have options to increase the aggregate commitments by up to $200,000, subject to approval of the
lenders. The Facility will be used for general corporate purposes and to issue standby letters of
credit. The Facility contains representations, warranties and covenants customary for similar bank
loan facilities, including a covenant to maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to total
capitalization as of the last day of each fiscal quarter or fiscal year of not greater than 0.35 to
1.0 and a covenant under the Unsecured Facility to maintain a certain consolidated net worth. In
addition, each material insurance subsidiary must maintain a financial strength rating from A.M
Best Company of at least A- under the Unsecured Facility and of at least B++ under the Secured
Facility. Concurrent with this new Facility, the Company terminated the Letter of Credit Facility
with Barclays Bank Plc and all outstanding letters of credit issued thereunder were transferred to
the Secured Facility. The Company is in compliance with all covenants under the Facility as of June
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
There are a total of 13 lenders that make up the Facility syndication and that have varying
commitments ranging from $20,000 to $87,500. Of the 13 lenders, four have commitments of $87,500
each, four have commitments of $62,500 each, four have commitments of $45,000 each and one has a
commitment of $20,000. The one lender in the Facility with a $20,000 commitment has declared
bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This lender did not meet its commitment
under the Facility. In July 2010, the Company replaced this bankrupt lender with another lender
for the full $20,000 commitment under the Facility.
In November 2008, Holdings requested a $250,000 borrowing under its Unsecured Facility. The
borrowing was requested to ensure the preservation of the Companys financial flexibility in light
of the uncertainty in the credit markets at that time. On November 21, 2008, the Company received
$243,750 of loan proceeds from the borrowing, as $6,250 was not received from the lender in
bankruptcy. On February 23, 2009, the Company repaid in full the $243,750 borrowing under its
Unsecured Facility.
-16-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
8. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following table shows an analysis of goodwill and intangible assets for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets with |
|
|
Intangible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
indefinite |
|
|
assets with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
lives |
|
|
finite lives |
|
|
Total |
|
Net balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
268,532 |
|
|
$ |
23,920 |
|
|
$ |
47,490 |
|
|
$ |
339,942 |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,185 |
) |
|
|
(4,185 |
) |
Impairments |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,866 |
) |
|
|
(7,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
268,376 |
|
|
|
23,920 |
|
|
|
36,439 |
|
|
|
328,735 |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,783 |
) |
|
|
(1,783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
268,376 |
|
|
|
23,920 |
|
|
|
34,656 |
|
|
|
326,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross balance |
|
|
268,532 |
|
|
|
23,920 |
|
|
|
48,200 |
|
|
|
340,652 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,678 |
) |
|
|
(6,678 |
) |
Impairments |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,866 |
) |
|
|
(7,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance |
|
$ |
268,376 |
|
|
$ |
23,920 |
|
|
$ |
34,656 |
|
|
$ |
326,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortization of the intangible assets with definite lives for the remainder of 2010 and
for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and thereafter will be $1,700, $2,978,
$2,533, $2,533, $2,533 and $22,378, respectively. The intangible assets will be amortized over a
weighted average useful life of 13.0 years.
9. INCOME TAXES
Under current Bermuda law, Holdings and its Bermuda subsidiaries are not required to pay taxes
in Bermuda on either income or capital gains. Holdings and Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd have
received an assurance from the Bermuda Minister of Finance under the Exempted Undertakings Tax
Protection Act 1966 of Bermuda, that in the event of any such taxes being imposed, Holdings and
Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd will be exempted from such taxes until March 28, 2016.
Certain subsidiaries of Holdings file U.S. federal income tax returns and various U.S. state
income tax returns, as well as income tax returns in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Switzerland and
Hong Kong. The following tax years by jurisdiction are open to examination:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years |
|
U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the U.S. subsidiaries |
|
|
2006 2009 |
|
Inland Revenue for the U.K. branches |
|
|
2008 2009 |
|
Irish Revenue Commissioners for the Irish subsidiaries |
|
|
2005 2009 |
|
Swiss Federal Tax Administration for the Swiss branch |
|
|
2008 2009 |
|
Inland Revenue Department for the Hong Kong branch |
|
|
2009 |
|
To the best of the Companys knowledge, there are no examinations pending by the Inland
Revenue or the Irish Revenue Commissioners. The IRS is currently completing an examination of the
2006 tax returns of Darwin Professional Underwriters, Inc. (Darwin). The examination covers the
tax return filed for the period subsequent to Darwins initial public offering on May 16, 2006 to
December 31, 2006.
Management has deemed all material tax positions to have a greater than 50% likelihood of
being sustained based on technical merits if challenged. The Company does not expect any material
unrecognized tax benefits within 12 months of January 2010.
-17-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
10. SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
a) Authorized shares
The authorized share capital of Holdings as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was
$10,000. The issued share capital consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Common shares issued and fully paid, par value $0.03 per share |
|
|
50,488,342 |
|
|
|
49,734,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital at end of period |
|
$ |
1,515 |
|
|
$ |
1,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
Shares issued, balance at beginning of period |
|
|
49,734,487 |
|
Shares issued |
|
|
753,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares issued at end of period |
|
|
50,488,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares issued, balance at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
Shares repurchased |
|
|
(1,081,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total treasury shares at end of period |
|
|
(1,081,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares outstanding |
|
|
49,407,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010, there were outstanding 40,957,448 voting common shares and 8,449,853
non-voting common shares.
b) Share Warrants
In conjunction with the private placement offering at the formation of the Company, the
Company granted warrants to certain founding shareholders to acquire up to 5,500,000 common shares
at an exercise price of $34.20 per share. These warrants are exercisable in certain limited
conditions, including a public offering of common shares, and expire November 21, 2011. Any cash
dividends paid to shareholders do not impact the exercise price of $34.20 per share for these
founder warrants. There are various restrictions on the ability of warrant holders to dispose of
their shares. As of June 30, 2010, none of these founder warrants have been exercised.
c) Dividends
In February 2010, the Company declared a dividend of $0.20 per common share payable on April
1, 2010 to shareholders of record on March 16, 2010. The total dividend paid amounted to $10,092.
In May 2010, the Company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per common share, payable on June
10, 2010 to shareholders of record on May 25, 2010. The total dividend paid amounted to $10,017.
In February 2009, the Company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per common share on April
2, 2009 payable to shareholders of record on March 17, 2009. In May 2009, the Company declared a
quarterly dividend of $0.18 per common share payable on June 11, 2009 to shareholders of record on
May 26, 2009.
d) Share repurchase
On May 6, 2010, the board of directors of Holdings authorized the Company to repurchase up to
$500,000 of Holdings common shares through a share repurchase program. Repurchases under the
authorization may be effected from time to time through open market purchases, privately negotiated
transactions, tender offers or otherwise. This authorization is effective through May 3, 2012. The
timing, form and amount of the share repurchases under the program will depend on a variety of
factors, including market conditions, the Companys capital position, legal requirements and other
factors. At any time, the repurchase program may be modified, extended or terminated by the board
of directors. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company repurchased, through open
market purchases, 1,081,401 shares for total proceeds of $49,089, which represented an average
repurchase price of $45.41 per share.
-18-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
a) Employee option plan
In 2001, the Company implemented the Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd Second
Amended and Restated 2001 Employee Stock Option Plan (the Plan). Under the Plan, up to 4,000,000
common shares of Holdings may be issued. Holdings has filed a registration statement on Form S-8
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to register common shares issued or reserved for
issuance under the Plan. These options are exercisable in certain limited conditions, expire after
10 years, and generally vest pro-rata over four years from the date of grant. The exercise price of
options issued are determined by the compensation committee of the board of directors but shall not
be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common shares of Holdings on the date the option
award is granted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Options |
|
Exercise Price |
Outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
1,314,907 |
|
|
$ |
35.54 |
|
Granted |
|
|
311,610 |
|
|
|
46.05 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(122,403 |
) |
|
|
29.22 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(19,546 |
) |
|
|
42.76 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(5,062 |
) |
|
|
45.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
1,479,506 |
|
|
$ |
38.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used in the option-pricing model for the options granted during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Granted During |
|
|
|
the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
Expected term of option |
|
|
5.47 |
years |
Weighted average risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.65 |
% |
Weighted average expected volatility |
|
|
42.35 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
Weighted average fair value on grant date |
|
$ |
17.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has assumed a weighted average annual forfeiture rate of 6.37% in determining the
compensation expense over the service period.
Compensation expense of $758 and $1,550 relating to the options has been included in general
and administrative expenses in the Companys consolidated income statements for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Compensation expense of $682 and $1,307 relating to the
options has been included in general and administrative expenses in the Companys consolidated
income statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. As of June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company has recorded in additional paid-in capital on the
consolidated balance sheets an amount of $33,942 and $28,699, respectively, in connection with all
options granted.
b) Stock incentive plan
In 2004, the Company implemented the Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd Second
Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the Stock Incentive Plan). The Stock Incentive
Plan provides for grants of restricted stock, restricted stock units (RSUs), dividend equivalent
rights and other equity-based awards. A total of 2,000,000 common shares may be issued under the
Stock Incentive Plan. To date, only RSUs have been granted. These RSUs generally vest in the fourth
or fifth year from the original grant date, or pro-rata over four years from the date of the grant.
-19-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
RSUs |
|
Value |
Outstanding RSUs at beginning of period |
|
|
915,432 |
|
|
$ |
36.51 |
|
RSUs granted |
|
|
41,197 |
|
|
|
46.05 |
|
Performance-based RSUs granted |
|
|
279,900 |
|
|
|
46.05 |
|
RSUs fully vested |
|
|
(143,183 |
) |
|
|
40.97 |
|
RSUs forfeited |
|
|
(8,802 |
) |
|
|
38.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding RSUs at end of period |
|
|
1,084,544 |
|
|
$ |
38.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2010, the Company granted performance-based RSUs in lieu of utilizing the LTIP (as
defined in Note 11(c)). The performance-based RSUs are structured in exactly the same form as
shares issued under the LTIP in terms of vesting restrictions and achievement of established
performance criteria. For the performance-based RSUs granted in 2010, the Company anticipates that
the performance goals are likely to be achieved. Based on the performance goals, the
performance-based RSUs granted in 2010 are expensed at 100% of the fair market value of Holdings
common share on the date of grant. The expense is recognized over the performance period.
Compensation expense of $3,327 and $7,041 relating to the issuance of the RSUs, including the
performance based RSUs, has been recognized in general and administrative expenses in the
Companys consolidated income statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively. Compensation expense of $2,273 and $4,624 relating to the issuance of the RSUs,
including the performance-based RSUs, has been recognized in general and administrative expenses
in the Companys consolidated income statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively. The compensation expense for the RSUs is based on the fair market value of Holdings
common shares at the time of grant. The Company has assumed a weighted average annual forfeiture
rate of 4.98% in determining the compensation expense over the service period.
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company has recorded $32,679 and $28,827,
respectively, in additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheets in connection with
the RSUs awarded.
c) Long-term incentive plan
In 2006, the Company implemented the Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd Second
Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP). The LTIP provides for performance based
equity awards to key employees in order to promote the long-term growth and profitability of the
Company. Each award represents the right to receive a number of common shares in the future, based
upon the achievement of established performance criteria during the applicable three-year
performance period. A total of 2,000,000 common shares may be issued under the LTIP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
LTIP |
|
Value |
Outstanding LTIP awards at beginning of period |
|
|
1,148,411 |
|
|
$ |
42.28 |
|
Additional LTIP awards granted due to the
achievement of 2007 2009 performance criteria |
|
|
181,250 |
|
|
|
43.40 |
|
LTIP awards vested |
|
|
(543,750 |
) |
|
|
43.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding LTIP awards at end of period |
|
|
785,911 |
|
|
$ |
41.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense of $3,842 and $8,863 relating to the LTIP has been recognized in general
and administrative expenses in the Companys consolidated income statements for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Compensation expense of $4,642 and $9,284 relating to
the LTIP has been recognized in general and administrative expenses in the Companys consolidated
income statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The compensation
expense for the LTIP is based on the fair market value of the Companys common shares at the time
of grant. The LTIP is deemed to be an equity plan and as such, $68,626 and $59,777 have been
included in additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively.
In calculating the compensation expense and in the determination of share equivalents for the
purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share, it is estimated for the LTIP awards granted in
2008 that the maximum performance goals as set by the LTIP are
-20-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
likely to be achieved over the
performance period. Based on the performance goals, the LTIP awards granted in 2008 are expensed at
150% of the fair market value of Holdings common shares on the date of grant. For the LTIP
awards granted in 2009, the Company anticipates that the performance goals as set by the LTIP are
likely to be achieved above the target but below the maximum over the performance period. Based on
the performance goals, the LTIP awards granted in 2009 are expensed at 132.5% of the fair market
value of Holdings common shares on the date of grant. The expense is recognized over the
performance period.
d) Cash-equivalent stock awards
As part of the Companys annual year-end compensation awards, the Company granted both
stock-based awards and cash-equivalent stock awards. The cash-equivalent awards were granted to
employees who received RSU and LTIP awards and were granted in lieu of granting the full award as a
stock-based award. The cash-equivalent time vesting RSU awards vest pro-rata over four years from
the date of grant. The cash-equivalent LTIP awards and performance based RSU awards vest after a
three-year performance period. As the cash-equivalent awards are settled in cash, we establish a
liability equal to the product of the fair market value of Holdings common shares as of the end of
the reporting period and the total awards outstanding. The liability is included in accounts
payable and accrued expenses in the balance sheets and changes in the liability are recorded in
general and administrative expenses in the consolidated income statements. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, the expense recognized for the cash-equivalent stock awards was $3,012
and $5,321, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the expense recognized
for the cash-equivalent stock awards was $809 and $1,345, respectively.
The following table shows the stock related compensation expense relating to the stock
options, RSUs, LTIP and cash equivalent awards for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Stock Options |
|
$ |
758 |
|
|
$ |
682 |
|
|
$ |
1,550 |
|
|
$ |
1,307 |
|
RSUs |
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
|
7,041 |
|
|
|
4,624 |
|
LTIP |
|
|
3,842 |
|
|
|
4,642 |
|
|
|
8,863 |
|
|
|
9,284 |
|
Cash-equivalent stock awards |
|
|
3,012 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
5,321 |
|
|
|
1,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,939 |
|
|
$ |
8,406 |
|
|
$ |
22,775 |
|
|
$ |
16,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the comparison of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
183,959 |
|
|
$ |
113,670 |
|
|
$ |
317,699 |
|
|
$ |
245,078 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
50,222,974 |
|
|
|
49,523,459 |
|
|
|
50,123,945 |
|
|
|
49,386,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
3.66 |
|
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
$ |
6.34 |
|
|
$ |
4.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-21-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
183,959 |
|
|
$ |
113,670 |
|
|
$ |
317,699 |
|
|
$ |
245,078 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
50,222,974 |
|
|
|
49,523,459 |
|
|
|
50,123,945 |
|
|
|
49,386,549 |
|
Share equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants and options |
|
|
1,486,465 |
|
|
|
766,954 |
|
|
|
1,534,861 |
|
|
|
774,605 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
456,946 |
|
|
|
339,002 |
|
|
|
469,301 |
|
|
|
337,130 |
|
LTIP awards |
|
|
808,025 |
|
|
|
628,471 |
|
|
|
958,601 |
|
|
|
717,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares and common
share equivalents outstanding diluted |
|
|
52,974,410 |
|
|
|
51,257,886 |
|
|
|
53,086,708 |
|
|
|
51,215,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
3.47 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
5.98 |
|
|
$ |
4.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, a weighted average of 686,938 employee stock
options and 24,833 RSUs, were considered anti-dilutive and were therefore excluded from the
calculation of the diluted earnings per share. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, a weighted
average of 600,567 employee stock options and 15,988 RSUs were considered anti-dilutive and were
therefore excluded from the calculation of the diluted earnings per share.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009 a weighted average of 777,407 employee stock options
and 257,485 RSUs, respectively, were considered anti-dilutive and were therefore excluded from the
calculation of the diluted earnings per share. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, a weighted
average of 695,234 employee stock options and 325,868 RSUs were considered anti-dilutive and were
therefore excluded from the calculation of the diluted earnings per share.
13. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The determination of reportable segments is based on how senior management monitors the
Companys underwriting operations. Management monitors the performance of its direct underwriting
operations based on the geographic location of the Companys offices, the markets and customers
served and the type of accounts written. The Company is currently organized into three operating
segments: U.S. insurance, international insurance and reinsurance. All product lines fall within
these classifications.
The U.S. insurance segment includes the Companys direct specialty insurance operations in the
United States. This segment provides both direct property and specialty casualty insurance
primarily to non-Fortune 1000 North American domiciled accounts. The international insurance
segment includes the Companys direct insurance operations in Bermuda, Europe and Hong Kong. This
segment provides both direct property and casualty insurance primarily to Fortune 1000 North
American domiciled accounts and mid-sized to large non-North American domiciled accounts. The
reinsurance segment includes the reinsurance of property, general casualty, professional liability,
specialty lines and property catastrophe coverages written by insurance companies. We presently
write reinsurance on both a treaty and a facultative basis, targeting several niche reinsurance
markets.
Responsibility and accountability for the results of underwriting operations are assigned by
major line of business within each segment. Because the Company does not manage its assets by
segment, investment income, interest expense and total assets are not allocated to individual
reportable segments. General and administrative expenses are allocated to segments based on various
factors, including staff count and each segments proportional share of gross premiums written.
Management measures results for each segment on the basis of the loss and loss expense
ratio, acquisition cost ratio, general and administrative expense ratio and the combined
ratio. The loss and loss expense ratio is derived by dividing net losses and loss expenses by
net premiums earned. The acquisition cost ratio is derived by dividing acquisition costs by net
premiums earned. The general and administrative expense ratio is derived by dividing general and
administrative expenses by net premiums earned.
The combined ratio is the sum of the loss and loss expense ratio, the acquisition cost
ratio and the general and administrative expense ratio.
The following table provides a summary of the segment results for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
-22-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
U.S. Insurance |
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
189,663 |
|
|
$ |
167,601 |
|
|
$ |
136,583 |
|
|
$ |
493,847 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
135,238 |
|
|
|
98,509 |
|
|
|
136,048 |
|
|
|
369,795 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
125,659 |
|
|
|
89,427 |
|
|
|
123,838 |
|
|
|
338,924 |
|
Other income |
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616 |
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
(69,198 |
) |
|
|
(64,580 |
) |
|
|
(54,944 |
) |
|
|
(188,722 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
(15,854 |
) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
(22,150 |
) |
|
|
(37,938 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(30,683 |
) |
|
|
(22,657 |
) |
|
|
(14,749 |
) |
|
|
(68,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting income |
|
|
10,540 |
|
|
|
2,256 |
|
|
|
31,995 |
|
|
|
44,791 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,594 |
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,933 |
|
Net impairment charges recognized in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(891 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,531 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
194,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
55.1 |
% |
|
|
72.2 |
% |
|
|
44.4 |
% |
|
|
55.7 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
92.1 |
% |
|
|
97.4 |
% |
|
|
74.2 |
% |
|
|
87.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
U.S. Insurance |
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
182,712 |
|
|
$ |
191,985 |
|
|
$ |
118,085 |
|
|
$ |
492,782 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
127,469 |
|
|
|
116,170 |
|
|
|
117,799 |
|
|
|
361,438 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
111,025 |
|
|
|
111,807 |
|
|
|
110,836 |
|
|
|
333,668 |
|
Other income |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369 |
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
(46,842 |
) |
|
|
(74,101 |
) |
|
|
(56,776 |
) |
|
|
(177,719 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
(13,543 |
) |
|
|
(1,667 |
) |
|
|
(21,753 |
) |
|
|
(36,963 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(29,996 |
) |
|
|
(19,914 |
) |
|
|
(11,585 |
) |
|
|
(61,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting income |
|
|
21,013 |
|
|
|
16,125 |
|
|
|
20,722 |
|
|
|
57,860 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,537 |
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,093 |
|
Net impairment charges recognized in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,474 |
) |
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,522 |
) |
Foreign exchange gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
124,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
42.2 |
% |
|
|
66.3 |
% |
|
|
51.2 |
% |
|
|
53.3 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
81.4 |
% |
|
|
85.6 |
% |
|
|
81.3 |
% |
|
|
82.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-23-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
U.S. Insurance |
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
351,748 |
|
|
$ |
289,023 |
|
|
$ |
357,239 |
|
|
$ |
998,010 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
266,793 |
|
|
|
179,590 |
|
|
|
356,704 |
|
|
|
803,087 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
254,864 |
|
|
|
176,470 |
|
|
|
245,914 |
|
|
|
677,248 |
|
Other income |
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
913 |
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
(167,623 |
) |
|
|
(122,029 |
) |
|
|
(131,224 |
) |
|
|
(420,876 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
(32,814 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,908 |
) |
|
|
(78,722 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(57,797 |
) |
|
|
(44,502 |
) |
|
|
(29,253 |
) |
|
|
(131,552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwrting (loss) income |
|
|
(2,457 |
) |
|
|
9,939 |
|
|
|
39,529 |
|
|
|
47,011 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,496 |
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,420 |
|
Net impairment charges recognized in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,783 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,059 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
331,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
65.8 |
% |
|
|
69.1 |
% |
|
|
53.4 |
% |
|
|
62.1 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
101.4 |
% |
|
|
94.3 |
% |
|
|
84.0 |
% |
|
|
93.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
U.S. Insurance |
|
|
Insurance |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
336,081 |
|
|
$ |
317,904 |
|
|
$ |
318,394 |
|
|
$ |
972,379 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
243,313 |
|
|
|
205,127 |
|
|
|
318,036 |
|
|
|
766,476 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
216,292 |
|
|
|
223,001 |
|
|
|
218,347 |
|
|
|
657,640 |
|
Other income |
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
835 |
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
(101,019 |
) |
|
|
(113,294 |
) |
|
|
(111,903 |
) |
|
|
(326,216 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
(27,954 |
) |
|
|
(2,727 |
) |
|
|
(43,410 |
) |
|
|
(74,091 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(57,395 |
) |
|
|
(38,733 |
) |
|
|
(22,732 |
) |
|
|
(118,860 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwrting income |
|
|
30,759 |
|
|
|
68,247 |
|
|
|
40,302 |
|
|
|
139,308 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,391 |
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,695 |
|
Net impairment charges recognized in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,437 |
) |
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,130 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,969 |
) |
Foreign exchange gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
266,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
46.7 |
% |
|
|
50.8 |
% |
|
|
51.3 |
% |
|
|
49.6 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
86.1 |
% |
|
|
69.4 |
% |
|
|
81.6 |
% |
|
|
79.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows an analysis of the Companys net premiums written by geographic
location of the Companys subsidiaries for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
All inter-company premiums have been eliminated.
-24-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share, percentage and ratio information)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
192,980 |
|
|
$ |
168,220 |
|
|
$ |
438,260 |
|
|
$ |
412,793 |
|
Bermuda |
|
|
131,119 |
|
|
|
151,299 |
|
|
|
258,901 |
|
|
|
270,312 |
|
Europe |
|
|
38,550 |
|
|
|
41,462 |
|
|
|
90,710 |
|
|
|
82,914 |
|
Hong Kong |
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
5,613 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
Singapore |
|
|
5,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net premiums written |
|
$ |
369,795 |
|
|
$ |
361,438 |
|
|
$ |
803,087 |
|
|
$ |
766,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On August 5, 2010, the Company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per common share,
payable on September 9, 2010 to shareholders of record on August 24, 2010.
On July 2, 2010, the Company sold its program administrator and wholesale brokerage operations
for $2,395 and recognized a gain on the sale of $2,071.
-25-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and result of operations
should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. References in this Form 10-Q to the terms we,
us, our, the company or other similar terms mean the consolidated operations of Allied World
Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd and its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.
References in this Form 10-Q to the term Holdings means Allied World Assurance Company Holdings,
Ltd only.
Note on Forward-Looking Statement
This Form 10-Q and other publicly available documents may include, and our officers and
representatives may from time to time make, projections concerning financial information and
statements concerning future economic performance and events, plans and objectives relating to
management, operations, products and services, and assumptions underlying these projections and
statements. These projections and statements are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are not historical facts but instead
represent only our belief regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently
uncertain and outside our control. These projections and statements may address, among other
things, our strategy for growth, product development, financial results and reserves. Actual
results and financial condition may differ, possibly materially, from these projections and
statements and therefore you should not place undue reliance on them. Factors that could cause our
actual results to differ, possibly materially, from those in the specific projections and
statements are discussed throughout this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and in Risk Factors in Item 1A of Part I of our 2009 Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 1,
2010. We are under no obligation (and expressly disclaim any such obligation) to update or revise
any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new
information, future developments or otherwise.
Overview
Our Business
We write a diversified portfolio of property and casualty insurance and reinsurance
internationally through our subsidiaries and branches based in Bermuda, Europe, Hong Kong,
Singapore and the United States. We manage our business through three operating segments: U.S.
insurance, international insurance and reinsurance. As of June 30, 2010, we had approximately $10.2
billion of total assets, $3.5 billion of total shareholders equity and $4.0 billion of total
capital, which includes shareholders equity and senior notes.
During the three and six month periods that ended June 30, 2010, we experienced premium rate
declines across all of our operating segments, in particular for the professional liability and
healthcare lines of business. We believe the premium rate decreases are due to increased
competition, increased capacity and an absence of large severity casualty losses. We expect this
trend to continue during the remainder of 2010 and we are anticipating this trend to continue into
2011. Despite the challenging pricing environment, we do believe that there are opportunities where
certain products have adequate returns and that the expanded breadth of our operations allows us to
target those classes of business. We have seen premium rate increases for certain general casualty
business with decreases in exposures given the recent economic environment. Given these trends, we
continue to be selective in the policies and reinsurance contracts we underwrite. Our consolidated
gross premiums written increased slightly by $1.0 million, or 0.2%, for the three months ended June
30, 2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009 and our net income increased $70.2
million, or 61.7%, for the same three-month period. Our consolidated gross premiums written
increased by $25.6 million, or 2.6%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six
months ended June 30, 2009, and our net income increased $72.6 million, or 29.6%, for the same
six-month period. The increase in net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010
compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was primarily due to higher net realized
investment gains and lower other-than-temporary-impairment charges (OTTI), partially offset by
higher net losses and loss expenses due to increased property losses.
Recent Developments
In March 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard
Update (ASU) 2010-11 Derivatives and Hedging: Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit
Derivatives (ASU 2010-11). On June 30, 2010, in accordance with ASU 2010-11, we elected the
fair value option for all of our mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. As a result of the
fair value election, starting with the three months ended September 30, 2010, any changes in the
fair value of the mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities will be recognized through earnings
in net realized investment gains (losses) on the
-26-
unaudited condensed consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income (consolidated income statements). On July
1, 2010, we reclassified $968.8 million of mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities,
combined, from fixed maturity investments available for sale, at fair value to fixed maturity
investments trading, at fair value on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets
(consolidated balance sheets). Also on July 1, 2010, we reclassified $42.4 million of net
unrealized gains from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings on the
consolidated balance sheets.
In April 2010, the Deepwater Horizon oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico exploded triggering an
underwater oil leak. The Deepwater Horizon well has yet to be fully contained and it is too early
to determine the liability potential for this event. To date, we have received only a few notices
of loss from our insureds and cedents. As the allocation of liability is yet to be determined, we
will continue to monitor this situation. At this time, we believe that we have sufficient reserves
for this event.
In May 2010, the board of directors of Holdings authorized the company to repurchase up to
$500 million of Holdings common shares through a share repurchase program. Repurchases under the
authorization may be effected from time to time through open market purchases, privately negotiated
transactions, tender offers or otherwise. This authorization is effective through May 3, 2012. The
timing, form and amount of the share repurchases under the program will depend on a variety of
factors, including market conditions, the companys capital position, legal requirements and other
factors. At any time, the repurchase program may be modified, extended or terminated by the board
of directors. As part of the share repurchase program, we entered into a 10b5-1 repurchase plan
that enables us to complete share repurchases during trading blackout periods. During the three
months ended June 30, 2010, we repurchased, through open-market purchases, 1,081,041 shares at a
total cost of $49.1 million, for an average price of $45.41 per share. We have classified these
repurchased shares as Treasury shares, at cost on the consolidated balance sheets.
In June 2010, we received approval from Lloyds of London to establish Syndicate 2232
(pseudonym AWH) that became fully operational and began writing business in June 2010. The
syndicate offers select product lines including international property, general casualty,
professional liability and international treaty reinsurance, targeted at key territories such as
countries in Latin America and the Asia Pacific region. Syndicate 2232s primary purpose is to
enhance our international insurance and reinsurance platforms and capabilities. In June 2010, we
had gross premiums written of $3.4 million, primarily
consisting of new business, through Syndicate 2232.
Financial Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
($ in millions except share and per share data) |
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
493.8 |
|
|
$ |
492.8 |
|
|
$ |
998.0 |
|
|
$ |
972.4 |
|
Net income |
|
|
184.0 |
|
|
|
113.7 |
|
|
|
317.7 |
|
|
|
245.1 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
112.9 |
|
|
|
157.0 |
|
|
|
250.4 |
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3.66 |
|
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
$ |
6.34 |
|
|
$ |
4.96 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
|
$ |
3.13 |
|
|
$ |
5.07 |
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3.47 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
5.98 |
|
|
$ |
4.79 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
|
$ |
2.96 |
|
|
$ |
4.89 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
50,222,974 |
|
|
|
49,523,459 |
|
|
|
50,123,945 |
|
|
|
49,386,549 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
52,974,410 |
|
|
|
51,257,887 |
|
|
|
53,086,708 |
|
|
|
51,215,808 |
|
Basic book value per common share |
|
$ |
70.20 |
|
|
$ |
55.35 |
|
|
$ |
70.20 |
|
|
$ |
55.35 |
|
Diluted book value per common share |
|
$ |
65.18 |
|
|
$ |
51.78 |
|
|
$ |
65.18 |
|
|
$ |
51.78 |
|
Annualized return on average equity
(ROAE), net income |
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
Annualized ROAE, operating income |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In presenting the companys results, management has included and discussed certain non-GAAP
financial measures, as such term is defined in Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.
Management believes that these non-GAAP measures, which
-27-
may be defined differently by other
companies, better explain the companys results of operations in a manner that allows for a more
complete understanding of the underlying trends in the companys business. However, these measures
should not be viewed as a substitute for those determined in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP).
Operating income & operating income per share
Operating income is an internal performance measure used in the management of our operations
and represents after-tax operational results excluding, as applicable, net realized investment
gains or losses, net impairment charges recognized in earnings, impairment of intangible assets and
foreign exchange gain or loss. We exclude net realized investment gains or losses, net impairment
charges recognized in earnings and net foreign exchange gain or loss from our calculation of
operating income because the amount of these gains or losses is heavily influenced by and
fluctuates in part according to the availability of market opportunities and other factors. We
exclude impairment of intangible assets as these are non-recurring charges. We believe these
amounts are largely independent of our business and underwriting process and including them
distorts the analysis of trends in our operations. In addition to presenting net income determined
in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we believe that showing operating income enables investors, analysts,
rating agencies and other users of our financial information to more easily analyze our results of
operations in a manner similar to how management analyzes our underlying business performance.
Operating income should not be viewed as a substitute for U.S. GAAP net income. The following is a
reconciliation of operating income to its most closely related U.S. GAAP measure, net income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions except per share data) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
184.0 |
|
|
$ |
113.7 |
|
|
$ |
317.7 |
|
|
$ |
245.1 |
|
Add after tax affect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
(88.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(162.4 |
) |
|
|
(41.7 |
) |
Net impairment charges recognized in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
Foreign exchange loss (gain) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
95.7 |
|
|
$ |
112.9 |
|
|
$ |
157.0 |
|
|
$ |
250.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3.66 |
|
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
$ |
6.34 |
|
|
$ |
4.96 |
|
Add after tax affect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
(1.77 |
) |
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
(3.24 |
) |
|
|
(0.84 |
) |
Net impairment charges recognized in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
Foreign exchange loss (gain) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
|
$ |
3.13 |
|
|
$ |
5.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted per share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3.47 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
5.98 |
|
|
$ |
4.79 |
|
Add after tax affect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
(1.68 |
) |
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
(3.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.81 |
) |
Net impairment charges recognized in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
Foreign exchange loss (gain) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
|
$ |
2.96 |
|
|
$ |
4.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized return on equity
Annualized return on average shareholders equity (ROAE) is calculated using average equity,
excluding the average after tax unrealized gains or losses on investments. Unrealized gains or
losses on investments are primarily the result of interest rate and risk premium movements and the
resultant impact on fixed income securities. Such gains or losses are not related to management
actions or operational performance, nor are they likely to be realized. Therefore, we believe that
excluding these unrealized gains or losses provides a more consistent and useful measurement of
operating performance, which supplements U.S. GAAP information. We present ROAE as a measure that
is commonly recognized as a standard of performance by investors, analysts, rating agencies and
other users of our financial information.
-28-
Annualized operating return on average shareholders equity is calculated using operating
income and average shareholders equity, excluding the average after tax unrealized gains or losses
on investments. Unrealized gains or losses are excluded from equity for the reasons outlined above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Opening shareholders equity |
|
$ |
3,338.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,491.9 |
|
|
$ |
3,213.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,416.9 |
|
Deduct: accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
(142.3 |
) |
|
|
(48.2 |
) |
|
|
(149.8 |
) |
|
|
(105.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted opening shareholders equity |
|
$ |
3,196.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,443.7 |
|
|
$ |
3,063.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,311.3 |
|
|
Closing shareholders equity |
|
$ |
3,468.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,741.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,468.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,741.4 |
|
Deduct: accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
(138.3 |
) |
|
|
(48.7 |
) |
|
|
(138.3 |
) |
|
|
(48.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted closing shareholders equity |
|
$ |
3,330.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,692.7 |
|
|
$ |
3,330.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,692.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shareholders equity |
|
$ |
3,263.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,568.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,196.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,502.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to shareholders |
|
$ |
184.0 |
|
|
$ |
113.7 |
|
|
$ |
317.7 |
|
|
$ |
245.1 |
|
Annualized return on average shareholders equity
net income available to shareholders |
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income available to shareholders |
|
$ |
95.7 |
|
|
$ |
112.9 |
|
|
$ |
157.0 |
|
|
$ |
250.4 |
|
Annualized return on average shareholders equity
operating income available to shareholders |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted book value per share
We have included diluted book value per share because it takes into account the effect of
dilutive securities; therefore, we believe it is an important measure of calculating shareholder
returns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions except share |
|
|
|
and per share data) |
|
Price per share at period end |
|
$ |
45.38 |
|
|
$ |
40.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
$ |
3,468.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,741.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic common shares outstanding |
|
|
49,407,301 |
|
|
|
49,524,492 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted share units |
|
|
804,644 |
|
|
|
947,180 |
|
Performance based equity awards |
|
|
1,409,984 |
|
|
|
1,329,661 |
|
Dilutive options/warrants outstanding |
|
|
6,667,941 |
|
|
|
6,569,616 |
|
Weighted average exercise price per share |
|
$ |
34.52 |
|
|
$ |
33.70 |
|
Deduct: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options bought back via treasury method |
|
|
(5,072,455 |
) |
|
|
(5,423,031 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares and common share equivalents
outstanding |
|
|
53,217,415 |
|
|
|
52,947,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic book value per common share |
|
$ |
70.20 |
|
|
$ |
55.35 |
|
Diluted book value per common share |
|
$ |
65.18 |
|
|
$ |
51.78 |
|
-29-
Relevant Factors
Revenues
We derive our revenues primarily from premiums on our insurance policies and reinsurance
contracts, net of any reinsurance or retrocessional coverage purchased. Insurance and reinsurance
premiums are a function of the amounts and types of policies and contracts we write, as well as
prevailing market prices. Our prices are determined before our ultimate costs, which may extend far
into the future, are known. In addition, our revenues include income generated from our investment
portfolio, consisting of net investment income and net realized investment gains or losses.
Investment income is principally derived from interest and dividends earned on investments,
partially offset by investment management expenses and fees paid to our custodian bank. Net
realized investment gains or losses include gains or losses from the sale of investments, as well
as the change in the fair value of investments that we mark-to-market through net income.
Due to changes in the recognition and presentation of OTTI of our available for sale fixed
maturity investments based on guidance issued by the FASB in April 2009, OTTI, which was previously
included in net realized investment gains or losses, is presented separately in the consolidated
income statements as net impairment charges recognized in earnings.
Expenses
Our expenses consist largely of net losses and loss expenses, acquisition costs, and general
and administrative expenses. Net losses and loss expenses incurred are comprised of three main
components:
|
|
|
losses paid, which are actual cash payments to insureds and reinsureds, net of recoveries
from reinsurers; |
|
|
|
outstanding loss or case reserves, which represent managements best estimate of the
likely settlement amount for known claims, less the portion that can be recovered from
reinsurers; and |
|
|
|
reserves for losses incurred but not reported, or IBNR, which are reserves (in addition
to case reserves) established by us that we believe are needed for the future settlement of
claims. The portion recoverable from reinsurers is deducted from the gross estimated loss. |
Acquisition costs are comprised of commissions, brokerage fees and insurance taxes.
Commissions and brokerage fees are usually calculated as a percentage of premiums and depend on the
market and line of business. Acquisition costs are reported after (1) deducting commissions
received on ceded reinsurance, (2) deducting the part of acquisition costs relating to unearned
premiums and (3) including the amortization of previously deferred acquisition costs.
General and administrative expenses include personnel expenses including stock-based
compensation charges, rent expense, professional fees, information technology costs and other
general operating expenses.
Ratios
Management measures results for each segment on the basis of the loss and loss expense
ratio, acquisition cost ratio, general and administrative expense ratio, expense ratio and
the combined ratio. Because we do not manage our assets by segment, investment income, interest
expense and total assets are not allocated to individual reportable segments. General and
administrative expenses are allocated to segments based on various factors, including staff count
and each segments proportional share of gross premiums written. The loss and loss expense ratio
is derived by dividing net losses and loss expenses by net premiums earned. The acquisition cost
ratio is derived by dividing acquisition costs by net premiums earned. The general and
administrative expense ratio is derived by dividing general and administrative expenses by net
premiums earned. The expense ratio is the sum of the acquisition cost ratio and the general and
administrative expense ratio. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss and loss expense ratio,
the acquisition cost ratio and the general and administrative expense ratio.
Critical Accounting Policies
It is important to understand our accounting policies in order to understand our financial
position and results of operations. Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
reflect determinations that are inherently subjective in nature and require management to make
assumptions and best estimates to determine the reported values. If events or other factors cause
actual results to
-30-
differ materially from managements underlying assumptions or estimates, there could be a
material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. We believe that some
of the more critical judgments in the areas of accounting estimates and assumptions that affect our
financial condition and results of operations are related to reserves for losses and loss expenses,
reinsurance recoverables, premiums and acquisition costs, valuation of financial instruments, other
than temporary impairment of investments and goodwill and other intangible asset impairment
valuation. For a detailed discussion of our critical accounting policies please refer to our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC. There were no material
changes in the application of our critical accounting estimates subsequent to that report.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated statement of operations data for each
of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
493.8 |
|
|
$ |
492.8 |
|
|
$ |
998.0 |
|
|
$ |
972.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written |
|
$ |
369.8 |
|
|
$ |
361.4 |
|
|
$ |
803.1 |
|
|
$ |
766.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
338.9 |
|
|
|
333.7 |
|
|
|
677.2 |
|
|
|
657.6 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
65.6 |
|
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
|
134.5 |
|
|
|
154.4 |
|
Net realized investment gains |
|
|
94.9 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
172.4 |
|
|
|
41.7 |
|
Net impairment charges recognized in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(47.4 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
500.0 |
|
|
$ |
410.2 |
|
|
$ |
984.8 |
|
|
$ |
807.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
188.7 |
|
|
$ |
177.7 |
|
|
$ |
420.9 |
|
|
$ |
326.2 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
78.7 |
|
|
|
74.1 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
68.1 |
|
|
|
61.5 |
|
|
|
131.5 |
|
|
|
118.9 |
|
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
Foreign exchange loss (gain) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
305.6 |
|
|
$ |
285.6 |
|
|
$ |
653.5 |
|
|
$ |
540.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
194.4 |
|
|
$ |
124.6 |
|
|
$ |
331.3 |
|
|
$ |
266.2 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
184.0 |
|
|
$ |
113.7 |
|
|
$ |
317.7 |
|
|
$ |
245.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
55.7 |
% |
|
|
53.3 |
% |
|
|
62.1 |
% |
|
|
49.6 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
18.1 |
% |
Expense ratio |
|
|
31.3 |
% |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
29.4 |
% |
Combined ratio |
|
|
87.0 |
% |
|
|
82.8 |
% |
|
|
93.1 |
% |
|
|
79.0 |
% |
Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Premiums
Gross premiums written increased by $1.0 million, or 0.2%, for the three months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. The overall increase in gross premiums
written was primarily the result of the following:
|
|
|
Gross premiums written in our U.S. insurance segment increased by $7.0 million, or 3.8%.
The increase in gross premiums written was primarily due to increased new business,
including from new products, for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended June
30, 2009. This increase was partially offset by the non-renewal of business that did not
meet our underwriting requirements (which included inadequate pricing and/or terms and
conditions) and increased competition. |
-31-
|
|
|
Gross premiums written in our international insurance segment decreased by $24.4 million,
or 12.7%, due to the continued trend of the non-renewal of business that did not meet our
underwriting requirements (which included inadequate pricing and/or terms and conditions)
and increased competition. |
|
|
|
Gross premiums written in our reinsurance segment increased by $18.5 million, or 15.7%.
The increase in gross premiums written was primarily due to one of our professional
liability reinsurance treaties that was previously written in the third quarter of 2009 for
$16.5 million and was renewed in the second quarter of 2010 for $10.9 million thereby
increasing gross premiums written during the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to
the three months ended June 30, 2009. This increase was partially offset by the non-renewal
of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which included inadequate
pricing and/or terms and conditions), increased competition and increased cedent retention. |
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by geographic location for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
United States |
|
$ |
247.4 |
|
|
$ |
223.5 |
|
|
$ |
23.9 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
Bermuda |
|
|
182.3 |
|
|
|
207.9 |
|
|
|
(25.6 |
) |
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
Europe |
|
|
57.0 |
|
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
Singapore |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
n/a |
* |
Hong Kong |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
104.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
493.8 |
|
|
$ |
492.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written increased by $8.4 million, or 2.3%, for the three months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in net premiums written was
primarily due to a reduction in premiums ceded. The difference between gross and net premiums
written is the cost to us of purchasing reinsurance coverage, including the cost of property
catastrophe reinsurance coverage. We ceded 25.1% of gross premiums written for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to 26.7% for the same period in 2009. The reduction in premiums ceded
was due to lower cessions on our property catastrophe reinsurance coverage. We renewed our
property catastrophe reinsurance treaty from May 1, 2010 to April 30, 2011, which resulted in
premiums ceded of $21.8 million. The cost of the property catastrophe reinsurance treaty was lower
than the expiring treaty by $6.9 million primarily due to reduced property exposure. The decreased cost of
the property catastrophe reinsurance treaty was partially offset by lower return premium on our
expiring property catastrophe reinsurance treaties of $2.8 million.
Net premiums earned increased by $5.2 million, or 1.6%, for the three months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009 as a result of higher net premiums earned for
the U.S. insurance and reinsurance segments. This is driven by increased net premiums written in
the current and prior periods.
We evaluate our business by segment, distinguishing between U.S. insurance, international
insurance and reinsurance. The following chart illustrates the mix of our business on both a gross
premiums written and net premiums earned basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Premiums |
|
|
Premiums |
|
|
|
Written |
|
|
Earned |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
U.S. insurance |
|
|
38.4 |
% |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
International insurance |
|
|
33.9 |
% |
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
|
33.5 |
% |
Reinsurance |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
36.5 |
% |
|
|
33.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
Net investment income decreased by $10.9 million, or 14.2%, for the three months ended June
30, 2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease was due to lower yields on
our fixed maturity investments despite the increase in book
value of our fixed maturity investments from June 30, 2009 to June 30, 2010. The annualized
period book yield of the investment
-32-
portfolio for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was
3.5% and 4.4%, respectively. The decrease in book yield was primarily caused by the overall market
interest rate environment, which is at historically low levels, and by selling corporate bonds and
mortgage-backed securities and reinvesting in lower yielding U.S. treasury securities in order to
reduce spread risk and duration in our investment portfolio. A lower duration implies that we are
investing in securities with shorter average lives, which results in lower book yield and should
result in less price sensitivity. Investment management expenses of $3.0 million and $1.6 million
were incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in
investment management expenses was due to the increase in the size of our investment portfolio as
well as additional fees paid to investment advisors for higher cost investment strategies.
As of June 30, 2010, approximately 96% of our fixed income investments consisted of investment
grade securities. As of June 30, 2010, the average credit rating of our fixed income portfolio was
AA- as rated by Standard & Poors and Aa3 as rated by Moodys. As of December 31, 2009, average
credit rating of our fixed income portfolio was AA as rated by Standard & Poors and Aa2 as rated
by Moodys. The average duration as of June 30, 2010 was approximately 2.6 years. The average
duration of the investment portfolio was 3.0 years as of June 30, 2009.
Realized Investment Gains/Losses and Net Impairment Charges Recognized in Earnings
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized $94.9 million in net realized
investment gains compared to net realized investment gains of
$5.1 million during the three months ended June 30,
2009. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we did not recognize any net impairment charges
compared to $5.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009. Net realized investment gains
of $94.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 were comprised of the following:
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains of $71.8 million from the sale of fixed maturity securities
due to the rebalancing of our portfolio from U.S. treasury and agency securities into other
assets, as well as shortening the overall duration of our investment portfolio. |
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains of $27.1 million primarily related to the mark-to-market
adjustments for our hedge fund investments, equity securities and fixed maturity investments
that are accounted for as trading securities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-Market Adjustments |
|
|
|
for the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Fixed maturity investments accounted for as trading securities |
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
Hedge funds and equity securities |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
27.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment loss of $4.0 million related to a U.S. treasury yield hedge
transaction we purchased in May 2010 and terminated in June 2010. |
Net realized investment gains of $5.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 were
comprised of the following:
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains of $7.5 million primarily related to the mark-to-market
adjustments for our hedge fund investments and fixed maturity
investments that are accounted for as trading securities. |
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses of $2.4 million from the sale of securities. The net
realized investment losses primarily consisted of a realized loss of $21.9 million related
to the sale of our global high-yield bond fund partially offset by realized gains of $19.1
million from the sale of fixed maturity investments and hedge funds and $0.4 million from
the sale of equity securities. |
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we had $5.5 million of net impairment charges
recognized in earnings due to credit related losses where the anticipated discounted cash flows of
various fixed maturity investments were lower than the amortized cost. The $5.5 million of net
impairment charges recognized in earnings consisted of $4.5 million related to mortgage-backed
securities and $1.0 million related to a corporate bond.
Other Income
The other income of $0.6 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively, represents fee
income from our program administrator and wholesale brokerage
operations.
-33-
Net Losses and Loss Expenses
Net losses and loss expenses increased by $11.0 million, or 6.2%, for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in net losses and loss
expenses was due to higher attritional loss activity of $30.0 million in the current year, with no comparable events having
occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2009.
The increase due to higher loss activity was offset by higher net
favorable prior year reserve development.
We recorded net favorable reserve development related to prior years of $64.1 million and
$36.7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The following
table shows the net favorable reserve development of $64.1 million by loss year for each of our
segments for the three months ended June 30, 2010. In the table, a negative number represents net
favorable reserve development and a positive number represents net unfavorable reserve development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
U.S. insurance |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.6 |
) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(20.9 |
) |
International insurance |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
(23.2 |
) |
Reinsurance |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
(6.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(29.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(64.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the favorable reserve development of $36.7 million by loss year
for each of our segments for the three months ended June 30, 2009. In the table, a negative number
represents net favorable reserve development and a positive number represents net unfavorable
reserve development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
U.S. insurance |
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.3 |
) |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(20.6 |
) |
International insurance |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
Reinsurance |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(16.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(22.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(24.5 |
) |
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
(36.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss and loss expense ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was 55.7%
compared to 53.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Net favorable reserve development
recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2010 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by
18.9 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current loss year was
74.6%. Net favorable reserve development recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2009 reduced
the loss and loss expense ratio by 11.0 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio
related to that loss year was 64.3%. The increase in the loss and loss expense ratio for the
current loss year was primarily due to increased incidences of large individual losses
compared to those incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2009. The $30.0 million of
current period losses noted above contributed 8.9 percentage points to the loss and loss expense
ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
-34-
The following table shows the components of the increase in net losses and loss expenses of
$11.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended June 30,
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net losses paid |
|
$ |
129.4 |
|
|
$ |
104.0 |
|
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
Net change in reported case reserves |
|
|
72.1 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
Net change in IBNR |
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
188.7 |
|
|
$ |
177.7 |
|
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, April 1 |
|
$ |
3,933.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,722.7 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
252.8 |
|
|
|
214.4 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(60.3 |
) |
|
|
(38.5 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
188.7 |
|
|
$ |
177.7 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
93.4 |
|
|
|
83.3 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
129.4 |
|
|
$ |
104.0 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
3,988.0 |
|
|
|
3,804.0 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
932.4 |
|
|
|
909.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
4,920.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,713.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Costs
Acquisition costs increased by $0.9 million, or 2.4%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in acquisition costs was primarily
due to the increase in net premiums earned in our U.S. insurance and reinsurance segments,
which typically have higher acquisition costs than our international insurance segment and
represent a higher proportion of net premiums earned during the three months ended June 30, 2010
compared to the same period in 2009. Acquisition costs as a percentage of net premiums earned were
11.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 11.1% for the same period in 2009.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by $6.6 million, or 10.7%, for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in general and administrative
expenses was primarily due to an increase in global headcount from
614 at June 30, 2009 to 684 at
June 30, 2010 resulting in an overall increase in salary and related costs, including stock-based
compensation of $3.3 million. Professional fees also increased by $3.9 million, which was primarily
related to the establishment of our Lloyds syndicate and the evaluation of potential strategic
opportunities.
Our general and administrative expense ratio was 20.1% for the three months ended June 30,
2010, which was higher than the
18.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily due to the
factors discussed above.
-35-
Our expense ratio was 31.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 29.5% for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to an increase in the general and administrative
expense ratio.
Amortization and Impairment of Intangible Assets
The amortization and impairment of intangible assets decreased $0.2 million, or 18.2%, for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 compared the three months ended
June 30, 2009. The decrease was
primarily the result of no longer amortizing the trademark intangible asset that was fully impaired
during the fourth quarter of 2009. No impairment of intangible assets was recognized during the
three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
Interest Expense
Interest expense of $9.5 million was incurred for both the three months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, and represented the quarterly interest expense on the senior notes.
Net Income
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $184.0 million compared to $113.7
million for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily the result of higher
net realized investment gains partially offset by higher net losses and loss expenses and general
and administrative expenses. Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 included a net
foreign exchange loss of $0.6 million and an income tax expense of $10.4 million. Net income for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 included a net foreign exchange gain of $1.2 million and an
income tax expense of $10.9 million.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Premiums
Gross premiums written increased by $25.6 million, or 2.6%, for the six months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The overall increase in gross premiums written
was primarily the result of the following:
|
|
|
Gross premiums written in our U.S. insurance segment increased by $15.6 million, or
4.6%. The increase in gross premiums written was primarily due to
increased new business, including from
new products, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared
to the six months ended June 30, 2009. This
increase was partially offset by the non-renewal of business that did not meet our
underwriting requirements (which included inadequate pricing and/or terms and conditions)
and increased competition. |
|
|
|
Gross premiums written in our international insurance segment decreased by $28.9
million, or 9.1%, due to the continued trend of the non-renewal of business that did not
meet our underwriting requirements (which included inadequate pricing and/or terms and
conditions) and increased competition. |
|
|
|
Gross premiums written in our reinsurance segment increased by $38.8 million, or 12.2%.
The increase in gross premiums written was primarily due to the timing of renewals for two
treaties, a quota share reinsurance treaty for $23.6 million in our property reinsurance
line of business and a quota share reinsurance treaty for $10.9 million in our
professional liability reinsurance line of business. The property reinsurance treaty was
originally bound in the third quarter of 2009 for $9.0 million and expired on November 30,
2009. The renewed treaty is effective from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010. The
professional liability reinsurance treaty was previously written in the third quarter of
2009 for $16.5 million and was renewed in the second quarter of 2010 for $10.9 million.
These increases were partially offset by the non-renewal of business that did not meet our
underwriting requirements (which included inadequate pricing and/or terms and conditions),
increased competition and increased cedent retention. |
-36-
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by geographic location for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
United States |
|
$ |
523.2 |
|
|
$ |
505.5 |
|
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Bermuda |
|
|
336.4 |
|
|
|
352.8 |
|
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
Europe |
|
|
123.2 |
|
|
|
113.6 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
Singapore |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
n/a |
* |
Hong Kong |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
n/m |
** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
998.0 |
|
|
$ |
972.4 |
|
|
$ |
25.6 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
n/a: not applicable |
|
** |
|
n/m: not meaningful |
Net premiums written increased by $36.7 million, or 4.8%, for the six months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in net premiums written was
primarily due to higher gross premiums written as well as a reduction in premiums ceded. The
difference between gross and net premiums written is the cost to us of purchasing reinsurance
coverage, including the cost of property catastrophe reinsurance coverage. We ceded 19.5% of gross
premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 21.2% for the same period in
2009. The reduction in premiums ceded was due to lower premiums ceded under our property
catastrophe reinsurance coverage, as well as the commutation of certain variable-rated reinsurance
contracts that have swing-rated provisions of $9.3 million partially offset by
premiums ceded of $11.8 million for variable-rated reinsurance contracts that were not commuted. A
swing-rated reinsurance contract links the ultimate amount of ceded premium to the ultimate loss
ratio on the reinsured business. It enables the cedent to retain a greater portion of premium if
the ultimate loss ratio develops at a level below the initial loss threshold set by the reinsurers,
but requires a higher amount of ceded premium if the ultimate loss ratio develops above the initial
threshold. Swing-rated reinsurance often, but not always, contains a provision limiting the maximum
decrease or increase in ceded premium. In commuting a number of swing-rated reinsurance contracts,
we reduced certain premiums previously ceded and also reduced ceded losses by $8.9 million in
accordance with the terms of the contracts. The impact of the commutation was a net gain of $0.4
million.
Net premiums earned increased by $19.6 million, or 3.0%, for the six months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009 as a result of higher net premiums earned for
the U.S. insurance and reinsurance segments. This is driven by increased net premiums written in
the current and prior periods, as well as the impact of the commutation of the swing-rated
reinsurance contracts which are fully earned.
We evaluate our business by segment, distinguishing between U.S. insurance, international
insurance and reinsurance. The following chart illustrates the mix of our business on both a gross
premiums written and net premiums earned basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Premiums |
|
|
Premiums |
|
|
|
Written |
|
|
Earned |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
U.S. insurance |
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
|
34.6 |
% |
|
|
37.6 |
% |
|
|
32.9 |
% |
International insurance |
|
|
29.0 |
% |
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
26.1 |
% |
|
|
33.9 |
% |
Reinsurance |
|
|
35.8 |
% |
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
33.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
Net investment income decreased by $19.9 million, or 12.9%, for the six months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease was due to a combination of lower
accretion of book value to par value for our fixed maturity investments, lower yields on our fixed
maturity investments and an increased allocation to hedge funds, which contribute to our total
return but carry no current yield. We increased our hedge fund investments by over $180
million between June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2010. In response to new OTTI guidance issued by the
FASB in April 2009, we increased the book value of our fixed maturity investments for any
non-credit OTTI previously recognized, which resulted in higher book values and lower future
accretions. The annualized period book yield of the investment portfolio for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009 was 3.6% and 4.4%,
-37-
respectively. The decrease in book yield was primarily
caused by selling corporate bonds and mortgage-backed securities and reinvesting in lower yielding
U.S. treasury securities in order to reduce spread risk and duration in our investment portfolio.
Investment management expenses of $5.6 million and $3.9 million were incurred during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in investment management expenses was due
to the increase in the size of our investment portfolio
as well as additional fees paid to investment advisors for higher
cost investment strategies.
Realized Investment Gains/Losses and Net Impairment Charges Recognized in Earnings
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized $172.4 million in net realized
investment gains compared to net realized investment gains of $41.7 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2009. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized $0.2 million in net
impairment charges recognized in earnings compared to $47.4 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2009. Net realized investment gains of $172.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010 were comprised of the following:
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains of $117.1 million primarily from the sale of fixed maturity
securities due to the rebalancing of our portfolio from U.S. treasury and agency securities
into other asset classes, as well as shortening the overall duration of our investment
portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains of $59.3 million primarily related to the mark-to-market
adjustments for our hedge fund investments, equity securities and fixed maturity investments
that are accounted for as trading securities. We expect the mark-to-market adjustments on
our fixed maturity investments that are accounted for as trading securities to increase as
we continue to increase the balance of these securities. From December 31, 2009 to June 30,
2010, we have increased the balance of fixed maturity investments accounted for as trading
by $1.8 billion, or 68%, from $2.5 billion as of December 31, 2009 to $4.3 billion as of
June 30, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-Market Adjustments |
|
|
|
for the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Fixed maturity investments accounted for as trading securities |
|
$ |
60.5 |
|
Hedge funds and equity securities |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
59.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment loss of $4.0 million related to a U.S. treasury yield hedge
transaction we purchased in May 2010 and terminated in June 2010. |
Net realized investment gains of $41.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were
comprised of the following:
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains of $7.4 million primarily related to the mark-to-market
adjustments for our hedge fund investments and fixed maturity
investments that are accounted for as trading securities. |
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains of $34.3 million from the sale of securities. The net
realized investment gains primarily consisted of realized gains of $56.6 million from the
sale of fixed maturity investments and hedge funds partially offset by a realized loss of
$21.9 million related to the sale of our global high-yield bond fund. In addition, we sold
approximately $18 million of equity securities that we acquired as part of the acquisition
of Darwin Professional Underwriters, Inc. (Darwin). We recognized a realized loss of $0.4
million from that sale. |
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we had $47.4 million of net impairment charges
recognized in earnings, $5.5 million due to credit related losses where the anticipated discounted
cash flows of the various fixed maturity investments were lower than the amortized cost, and $41.9
million of net impairment charges for those securities in an unrealized loss position where our
investment managers had the discretion to sell.
Other Income
The other income of $0.9 million and $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively, represents fee income from our program administrator and wholesale brokerage
operations.
-38-
Net Losses and Loss Expenses
Net losses and loss expenses increased by $94.7 million, or 29.0%, for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in net losses and loss
expenses was due to a number of individual losses totaling $116.5 million in the current year, with no comparable events having
occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
The increase due to higher loss activity was offset by higher net favorable prior year reserve
development.
We recorded net favorable reserve development related to prior years of $138.1 million and
$96.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The $138.1 million
of net favorable reserve development excludes the impact of the commutation of the swing-rated
reinsurance contracts of $8.9 million. The following table shows the net favorable reserve
development of $138.1 million by loss year for each of our segments for the six months ended June
30, 2010. In the table, a negative number represents net favorable reserve development and a
positive number represents net unfavorable reserve development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
U.S. insurance |
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(14.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(24.6 |
) |
International insurance |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
(43.9 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
(80.9 |
) |
Reinsurance |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(32.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(39.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(64.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(14.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(138.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the favorable reserve development of $96.8 million by loss year
for each of our segments for the six months ended June 30, 2009. In the table, a negative number
represents net favorable reserve development and a positive number represents net unfavorable
reserve development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
U.S. insurance |
|
$ |
(4.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(13.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(17.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.5 |
) |
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
(28.1 |
) |
International insurance |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
|
|
(38.3 |
) |
|
|
(21.8 |
) |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
(47.4 |
) |
Reinsurance |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(9.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(41.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(61.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(28.9 |
) |
|
$ |
28.9 |
|
|
$ |
(5.5 |
) |
|
$ |
22.3 |
|
|
$ |
(96.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss and loss expense ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was 62.1% compared
to 49.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Net favorable reserve development recognized and
the impact of the commutation adjustment during the six months ended June 30, 2010 reduced the loss
and loss expense ratio by 20.2 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to
the current loss year was 82.3%. Net favorable reserve development recognized in the six months
ended June 30, 2009 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 14.7 percentage points. Thus, the
loss and loss expense ratio related to that loss year was 64.3%. The increase in the loss and loss
expense ratio for the current loss year was primarily due to
$116.5 million of losses from the Chilean, Haitian and Baja
earthquakes, the Connecticut power plant explosion, European Windstorm Xynthia, a mine
collapse and hail storms in Australia during the
six months ended June 30, 2010, which contributed 17.2 points to the current loss
years loss and loss expense ratio.
-39-
The following table shows the components of the increase in net losses and loss expenses of
$94.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30,
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
| |
| |
|
Net losses paid |
|
$ |
265.4 |
|
|
$ |
215.1 |
|
|
$ |
50.3 |
|
Net change in reported case reserves |
|
|
78.4 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
Net change in IBNR |
|
|
77.1 |
|
|
|
66.1 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
420.9 |
|
|
$ |
326.2 |
|
|
$ |
94.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, January 1 |
|
$ |
3,841.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,688.5 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commutation of variable-rated reinsurance contracts |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
485.1 |
|
|
|
423.0 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(133.4 |
) |
|
|
(98.5 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
420.9 |
|
|
$ |
326.2 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
216.8 |
|
|
|
172.8 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
265.4 |
|
|
$ |
215.1 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
3,988.0 |
|
|
|
3,804.0 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
932.4 |
|
|
|
909.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
4,920.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,713.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Costs
Acquisition costs increased by $4.6 million, or 6.2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in acquisition costs was primarily due
to the increase in net premiums earned in our U.S. insurance segment and reinsurance segment, which
typically have higher acquisition costs than our international insurance segment and represent a
higher proportion of net premiums earned during the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the
same period in 2009. Acquisition costs as a percentage of net premiums earned were 11.6% for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 11.3% for the same period in 2009 for the reasons
explained above.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by $12.6 million, or 10.6%, for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in general and administrative
expenses was primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
An overall increase in global headcount from 614 at June 30, 2009 to 684 at June 30, 2010
resulting in an overall increase in salary and related costs of $10.7 million. |
-40-
|
|
|
Increased stock-related compensation of $6.2 million, including an increase of $2.2
million for performance-based awards granted under the Companys equity plans in 2009 to
recognize expected performance above the target level. For all performance-based awards, we
initially recognize the stock compensation expense at 100% of the fair market value of
Holdings common shares on the date of grant and reassess, at least annually, the projected
growth in book value to determine whether an adjustment to the initial estimate of the
expense should be made. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we have accrued 132.5% of
the fair market value of Holdings common shares awarded on the date of grant, as we believe
it is probable that we will achieve the performance criteria above target but below the
maximum award when these performance-based awards vest at the end of 2011. For additional
information on our performance-based awards, see Note 11 in our notes to the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Decrease of $6.8 million related to the Darwin Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Darwin
LTIP). We recognized a reduction in the Darwin LTIP of $1.3 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to an increase of $5.5 million during the six months ended June
30, 2009. The amount incurred for the Darwin LTIP is a result of pre-acquisition
underwriting profitability, including any subsequent loss reserve development. The reduction
in the Darwin LTIP during the six months ended June 30, 2010 was due to unfavorable reserve
development. |
Our general and administrative expense ratio was 19.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
which was higher than the 18.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily
due to the factors discussed above.
Our expense ratio was 31.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 29.4% for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 due to an increase in both acquisition cost ratio and general and
administrative expense ratio.
Amortization and Impairment of Intangible Assets
The amortization and impairment of intangible assets decreased $0.3 million, or 14.3%, for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 compared the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease is
primarily the result of no longer amortizing the trademark intangible asset that was fully impaired
during the fourth quarter of 2009. No impairments were recognized during the six months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $1.0 million, or 5.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. Interest expense of $1.0 million was incurred
during the three months ended March 31, 2009 on our borrowing of $243.8 million from our $400
million unsecured revolving credit facility, which was paid in full in February 2009.
Net Income
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $317.7 million compared to $245.1
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily the result of higher net
realized investment gains, lower OTTI and higher net premiums earned partially offset by higher
net losses and loss expenses and general and administrative expenses. Net income for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 included a net foreign exchange loss of $1.6 million and an income tax expense
of $13.6 million. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 included a net foreign exchange
gain of $0.4 million and an income tax expense of $21.1 million. The decrease in the income tax
expense was primarily due to lower taxable income in our U.S. operations during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to same period in 2009.
Underwriting Results by Operating Segments
Our company is organized into three operating segments:
U.S. Insurance Segment. The U.S. insurance segment includes our direct specialty insurance
operations in the United States. This segment provides both direct property and specialty casualty
insurance to non-Fortune 1000 North American domiciled accounts.
International Insurance Segment. The international insurance segment includes our direct
insurance operations in Bermuda, Europe and Hong Kong. This segment provides both direct property
and casualty insurance primarily to Fortune 1000 North American domiciled accounts and mid-sized to
large non-North American domiciled accounts.
-41-
Reinsurance Segment. Our reinsurance segment has operations in Bermuda, Europe, Singapore and
the United States. This segment includes the reinsurance of property, general casualty,
professional liability, specialty lines and property catastrophe coverages written by insurance
companies. We presently write reinsurance on both a treaty and a facultative basis, targeting
several niche reinsurance markets.
U.S. Insurance Segment
The following table summarizes the underwriting results and associated ratios for the U.S.
insurance segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
189.7 |
|
|
$ |
182.7 |
|
|
$ |
351.7 |
|
|
$ |
336.1 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
135.2 |
|
|
|
127.5 |
|
|
|
266.8 |
|
|
|
243.3 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
125.7 |
|
|
|
111.0 |
|
|
|
254.9 |
|
|
|
216.3 |
|
Other income |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
69.2 |
|
|
$ |
46.8 |
|
|
$ |
167.6 |
|
|
$ |
101.0 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
Underwriting income (loss) |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
30.7 |
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
55.1 |
% |
|
|
42.2 |
% |
|
|
65.8 |
% |
|
|
46.7 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
Expense ratio |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
|
39.2 |
% |
|
|
35.6 |
% |
|
|
39.4 |
% |
Combined ratio |
|
|
92.1 |
% |
|
|
81.4 |
% |
|
|
101.4 |
% |
|
|
86.1 |
% |
Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Premiums. Gross premiums written increased by $7.0 million, or 3.8%, for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in gross premiums written was
primarily due to higher volume from new products and increased underwriting staff, particularly in
our general casualty and healthcare lines of business where we believe profitable underwriting
opportunities exist. The increase was partially offset by the non-renewal of business that did not
meet our underwriting requirements (which included inadequate pricing and/or terms and conditions)
and increased competition, particularly for public directors and officers liability products in our
professional liability line of business.
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
| |
| |
($ in millions) |
|
Professional liability |
|
$ |
44.8 |
|
|
$ |
46.9 |
|
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
Healthcare |
|
|
41.1 |
|
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
General casualty |
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
General property |
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
Programs |
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
109.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
189.7 |
|
|
$ |
182.7 |
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written increased by $7.7 million, or 6.0%, for the three months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2009. The increase in net premiums written was primarily due to higher gross
premiums written, as well as a reduction of premiums ceded.
-42-
Net premiums earned increased $14.7 million, or 13.2%, primarily due to the growth of our U.S.
insurance operations during 2009 and during the first half of 2010.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses increased by $22.4 million, or
47.9%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009.
The increase in net losses and loss expenses was primarily due to the growth of the U.S. insurance
operations and higher loss activity in the current year, which included net losses and loss
expenses incurred of $3.0 million from the Tennessee floods.
Overall, our U.S. insurance segment recorded net favorable reserve development of $20.9
million during the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to net favorable reserve development
of $20.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as shown in the tables below. In the
tables, a negative number represents net favorable reserve development and a positive number
represents net unfavorable reserve development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Professional liability |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(8.0 |
) |
Healthcare |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
General casualty |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
General property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
(20.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Professional liability |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
Healthcare |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
General casualty |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
General property |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.3 |
) |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
(20.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss and loss expense ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was 55.1%
compared to 42.2% for the three months ended June, 2009. Net favorable reserve development
recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased the loss and loss expense ratio by
16.6 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio for the current loss year was 71.7%.
In comparison, net favorable reserve development recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2009
decreased the loss and loss expense ratio by 18.6 percentage points. In addition, during the three
months ended June 30, 2009, the $4.0 million reduction in premiums ceded for the variable-rated
reinsurance contracts of Darwin that have swing-rated provisions reduced the loss and loss expense
ratio by 2.2 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio for that loss year was 63.0%.
The increase in the loss and loss expense ratio for the current loss year was primarily due to
higher loss activity, including incurred losses of $3.0 from the Tennessee floods, which
contributed 2.4 percentage points to the loss and loss expense ratio for the three months ended
June 30, 2010.
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
-43-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, April 1 |
|
$ |
972.0 |
|
|
$ |
847.1 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
90.1 |
|
|
|
67.4 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
69.2 |
|
|
$ |
46.8 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
35.5 |
|
|
$ |
24.6 |
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
1,005.7 |
|
|
|
869.3 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
378.0 |
|
|
|
324.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
1,383.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,194.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs increased by $2.4 million, or 17.8%, for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was
primarily caused by increased net premiums earned. The acquisition cost ratio increased to 12.6%
for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from 12.2% for the same period in 2009.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by $0.7
million, or 2.3%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended June
30, 2009. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to increased salary
and related costs partially offset by $2.0 million of lower expenses related to the Darwin LTIP.
The decrease in the general and administrative expense ratio from 27.0% for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 to 24.4% for the same period in 2010 was the result of the increase in net premiums
earned.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Premiums. Gross premiums written increased by $15.6 million, or 4.6%, for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in gross premiums written was
primarily due to higher volumes from new products and increased underwriting staff, particularly in
our general casualty and healthcare lines of business where we believe underwriting opportunities
were present. While healthcare premium rates are down, we still believe there are attractive
opportunities in this line of business. The increase was partially offset by the non-renewal of
business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which included inadequate pricing and/or
terms and conditions) and increased competition, particularly for public directors and officers
liability products in our professional liability line of business.
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
| |
| |
($ in millions) |
|
Healthcare |
|
$ |
88.6 |
|
|
$ |
86.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Professional liability |
|
|
83.7 |
|
|
|
88.9 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
General casualty |
|
|
66.4 |
|
|
|
57.0 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
Programs |
|
|
51.0 |
|
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
General property |
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
84.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
351.7 |
|
|
$ |
336.1 |
|
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-44-
Net premiums written increased by $23.5 million, or 9.7%, for the six months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in net premiums written was
primarily due to higher gross premiums written, as well as a reduction of premiums ceded. The
reduction in premiums ceded was primarily due to lower cessions in
our general casualty and general property lines of business and the commutation of certain variable-rated reinsurance
contracts that have swing-rated provisions of $9.3 million partially offset by
premiums ceded of $11.8 million for variable-rated reinsurance contracts that were not commuted. In
commuting these swing-rated reinsurance contracts, we reduced certain premiums previously ceded and
also reduced ceded losses by $8.9 million in accordance with the terms of the contracts. The net
impact of the commutation during the six months ended June 30, 2010 was a net gain of $0.4 million.
Overall, we ceded 24.2% of gross premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared
to 27.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in the cession percentage was
primarily due to the reduction of premiums ceded of $9.3 million related to the commutation of the
swing-rated reinsurance contracts. Excluding the impact of the commutation, we ceded 26.8% of gross
premiums written during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Net premiums earned increased $38.6 million, or 17.8%, primarily due to the growth of our U.S.
insurance operations during 2009 and during the first half of 2010 and $9.3 million from the
commutation, which was fully earned.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses increased by $66.6 million, or
65.9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
increase in net losses and loss expenses was primarily due to a $12.0 million net loss from a
Connecticut power plant explosion in our program line of business, the reduction of ceded IBNR for
the commutation of the swing-rated reinsurance contracts of $8.9 million, $3.0 million from the
Tennessee floods and lower net favorable reserve development recognized.
Overall, our U.S. insurance segment recorded net favorable reserve development of $24.6
million during the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to net favorable reserve development of
$28.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, as shown in the tables below. The $24.6
million of net favorable reserve development excludes the impact of the commutation of the
swing-rated reinsurance contracts of $8.9 million discussed above. In the tables, a negative number
represents net favorable reserve development and a positive number represents net unfavorable
reserve development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Professional liability |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(7.6 |
) |
Healthcare |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
General casualty |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
General property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(14.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.4 |
) |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
(24.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Professional liability |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
16.8 |
|
Healthcare |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
General casualty |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
General property |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(13.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(17.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.5 |
) |
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
(28.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss and loss expense ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was 65.8% compared
to 46.7% for the six months ended June, 2009. Net favorable reserve development recognized and the
impact of the commutation adjustment to ceded IBNR during the six months ended June 30, 2010
decreased the loss and loss expense ratio by 8.8 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense
ratio for the current loss year was 74.6%. In comparison, net favorable reserve development
recognized in the six months ended June
-45-
30, 2009 decreased the loss and loss expense ratio by 13.0 percentage points. In addition,
during the six months ended June 30, 2009, the $10.1 million reduction in premiums ceded for the
variable-rated reinsurance contracts of Darwin that have swing-rated provisions reduced the loss
and loss expense ratio by 2.9 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio for that
loss year was 62.6%. The increase in the loss and loss expense ratio for the current loss year was
primarily due to the $12.0 million net loss on the Connecticut power plant explosion and $3.0
million from the Tennessee floods. These losses contributed 6.1 percentage points to the current
loss years loss and loss expense ratio, after adjusting for the $9.3 million impact to ceded
earned premium of the commuted swing-rated reinsurance contracts previously discussed.
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, January 1 |
|
$ |
901.9 |
|
|
$ |
819.4 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commutation of variable-rated reinsurance contracts |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
183.3 |
|
|
|
129.1 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(25.6 |
) |
|
|
(32.0 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
167.6 |
|
|
$ |
101.0 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
57.3 |
|
|
|
40.5 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
63.8 |
|
|
$ |
51.1 |
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
1,005.7 |
|
|
|
869.3 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
378.0 |
|
|
|
324.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
1,383.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,194.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs increased by $4.8 million, or 17.1%, for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase was
primarily caused by increased net premiums earned. The acquisition cost ratio was 12.9% for both
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by $0.4
million, or 0.7%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30,
2009. The increase in general and administrative expenses was due to higher salary and related
costs from increased headcount offset by the reduction in the Darwin
LTIP of $6.8 million. The decrease in the
general and administrative expense ratio from 26.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to 22.7%
for the same period in 2010 was the result of the increase in net premiums earned.
-46-
International Insurance Segment
The following table summarizes the underwriting results and associated ratios for the
international insurance segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
167.6 |
|
|
$ |
192.0 |
|
|
$ |
289.0 |
|
|
$ |
317.9 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
116.2 |
|
|
|
179.6 |
|
|
|
205.1 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
89.4 |
|
|
|
111.8 |
|
|
|
176.4 |
|
|
|
223.0 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
64.6 |
|
|
$ |
74.1 |
|
|
$ |
122.0 |
|
|
$ |
113.3 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
44.5 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
Underwriting income |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
72.2 |
% |
|
|
66.3 |
% |
|
|
69.1 |
% |
|
|
50.8 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
Expense ratio |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
Combined ratio |
|
|
97.4 |
% |
|
|
85.6 |
% |
|
|
94.3 |
% |
|
|
69.4 |
% |
Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Premiums. Gross premiums written decreased by $24.4 million, or 12.7%, for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease in gross premiums written was
due to the continued trend of the non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting
requirements (which included inadequate pricing and/or terms and conditions) and increased
competition in our international insurance segment.
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
General property* |
|
$ |
59.7 |
|
|
$ |
73.1 |
|
|
$ |
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
(18.3 |
)% |
Professional liability |
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
General casualty |
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
Healthcare |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
167.6 |
|
|
$ |
192.0 |
|
|
$ |
(24.4 |
) |
|
|
(12.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes our energy line of business. |
Net premiums written decreased $17.7 million, or 15.2%, for the three months ended June 30,
2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in net premiums written was
primarily due to the decrease in gross premiums written, partially offset by lower premiums ceded
on our property catastrophe reinsurance coverage. We ceded to reinsurers 41.2% of gross premiums
written for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 39.5% for the three months ended June
30, 2009. The increase in the ceded premium percentage is due to increased cessions on our
professional liability and general casualty reinsurance treaties. Net premiums earned decreased
$22.4 million, or 20.0%, primarily due to lower net premiums written during 2009 and for the first
half of 2010.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses decreased by $9.5 million, or
12.8%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009.
The decrease in net losses and loss expenses was primarily due to higher net favorable reserve
development recognized partially offset by higher attritional loss activity in the current period.
During the three
-47-
months
ended June 30, 2010, we incurred net losses and loss expenses of
$24.0
million from a mine collapse, the Baja, Mexico earthquake and the
Tennessee floods. No comparable events occurred during the three months ended June 30,
2009. The loss from the mine collapse was incurred in our general casualty line of business,
while the rest of the losses noted above were incurred in our general property line of business.
Overall, our international insurance segment recorded net favorable reserve development of $23.2
million during the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to net favorable reserve development
of $6.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as shown in the tables below. In the
tables, a negative number represents net favorable reserve development and a positive number
represents net unfavorable reserve development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
General property |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.7 |
) |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
(10.6 |
) |
Professional liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
General casualty |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
Healthcare |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
(4.6 |
) |
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
$ |
(15.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.7 |
) |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
(23.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
General property |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
Professional liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
General casualty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Healthcare |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(14.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(20.6 |
) |
|
$ |
23.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss and loss expense ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was 72.2%,
compared to 66.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The net favorable reserve development
recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased the loss and loss expense ratio by
26.0 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current loss year was
98.2%. Comparatively, the net favorable reserve development recognized during the three months
ended June 30, 2009 decreased the loss and loss expense ratio by 6.1 percentage points. Thus, the
loss and loss expense ratio related to that periods business was 72.4%. The increase in the loss
and loss expense ratio for the current loss year was primarily due to net incurred losses of $24.0
million noted above, which occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and contributed
26.8 percentage points to the current years losses and loss expense ratio.
Net paid losses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were $53.5 million and $38.0
million, respectively. The increase in net paid losses was primarily due to net paid losses on
current year catastrophe losses.
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
-48-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, April 1 |
|
$ |
1,776.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,787.1 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
87.8 |
|
|
|
80.9 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(18.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
64.6 |
|
|
$ |
74.1 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
53.5 |
|
|
$ |
38.0 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
1,782.8 |
|
|
|
1,830.8 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
554.7 |
|
|
|
581.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
2,337.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,412.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs decreased to negative $0.1 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 from positive $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009.
The negative cost represents ceding commissions received on ceded premiums in excess of the
brokerage fees and commissions paid on gross premiums written. The acquisition cost ratio
decreased from 1.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 to negative 0.1% for the three months
ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in the acquisition cost ratio is due to higher premiums ceded,
which has increased ceding commission income.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $2.6
million, or 13.0%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended June
30, 2009. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to an increase in
salary and related costs, including stock-based compensation. The general and administrative
expense ratios for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were 25.3% and 17.8%,
respectively. The increase was due to higher general and administrative expense relative to lower net premiums
earned.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Premiums. Gross premiums written decreased by $28.9 million, or 9.1%, for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease in gross premiums written was due
to the continued trend of the non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting
requirements (which included inadequate pricing and/or terms and conditions) and increased
competition in our international insurance segment.
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
General property* |
|
$ |
99.4 |
|
|
$ |
116.7 |
|
|
$ |
(17.3 |
) |
|
|
(14.8 |
)% |
Professional liability |
|
|
77.7 |
|
|
|
88.2 |
|
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
General casualty |
|
|
76.8 |
|
|
|
81.4 |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
Healthcare |
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
289.0 |
|
|
$ |
317.9 |
|
|
$ |
(28.9 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes our energy line of business. |
-49-
Net premiums written decreased $25.5 million, or 12.4%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in net premiums written was primarily
due to the decrease in gross premiums written partially offset by lower premiums ceded on our
property catastrophe reinsurance coverage. We ceded to reinsurers 37.9% of gross premiums written
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to 35.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
The increase is primarily due to increased cessions on our general casualty and professional
liability lines of business. Net premiums earned decreased $46.6 million, or 20.9%, primarily due
to lower net premiums written during 2009 and for the first half of 2010.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses increased by $8.7 million, or 7.7%,
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase
in net losses and loss expenses was primarily due to higher loss activity in the current period
partially offset by higher net favorable reserve development recognized. During the six months
ended June 30, 2010, we experienced net losses and loss expenses
of $81.5 million from the
earthquakes in Haiti, Chile, and Baja, Mexico, a mine
collapse, and the Tennessee floods.
Overall, our international insurance segment recorded net favorable reserve development of $80.8
million during the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to net favorable reserve development of
$47.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, as shown in the tables below. In the tables,
a negative number represents net favorable reserve development and a positive number represents net
unfavorable reserve development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
General property |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(14.6 |
) |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
(24.8 |
) |
Professional liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
General casualty |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22.7 |
) |
Healthcare |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
(6.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(14.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(43.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.3 |
) |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
(80.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
General property |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.2 |
) |
|
$ |
20.3 |
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
Professional liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(28.0 |
) |
General casualty |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(16.6 |
) |
|
|
(15.9 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(12.7 |
) |
Healthcare |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(5.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(19.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(38.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(21.9 |
) |
|
$ |
21.9 |
|
|
$ |
(5.1 |
) |
|
$ |
20.6 |
|
|
$ |
(47.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss and loss expense ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was 69.1%,
compared to 50.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The net favorable reserve development
recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased the loss and loss expense ratio by
45.8 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current loss year was
114.9%. Comparatively, the net favorable reserve development recognized during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 decreased the loss and loss expense ratio by 21.3 percentage points. Thus, the loss
and loss expense ratio related to that periods business was 72.1%. The increase in the loss and
loss expense ratio for the current loss year was primarily due to net incurred losses of $81.5
million noted above, which occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and contributed 46.2
percentage points to the current years losses and loss expense ratio.
Net paid losses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were $120.0 million and $83.9
million, respectively. The increase in net paid losses was primarily due to two large loss
payments totaling approximately $17 million in our general casualty line of business and net paid
losses for current year catastrophe losses.
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
-50-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, January 1 |
|
$ |
1,790.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,797.0 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
152.8 |
|
|
|
160.7 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(76.5 |
) |
|
|
(45.6 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
122.0 |
|
|
$ |
113.3 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
83.5 |
|
|
|
64.9 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
120.0 |
|
|
$ |
83.9 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
1,782.8 |
|
|
|
1,830.8 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
554.7 |
|
|
|
581.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
2,337.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,412.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs decreased $2.7 million for the six months ended June
30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The acquisition cost ratio decreased from
1.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to 0.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The
decrease in the acquisition cost ratio is due to higher premiums ceded, which has increased ceding
commission income.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $5.8
million, or 15.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30,
2009. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to an increase in
salary and related costs, including stock-based compensation. The general and administrative
expense ratios for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were 25.2% and 17.4%, respectively,
due to higher general and administrative expense relative to lower net premiums earned.
Reinsurance Segment
The following table summarizes the underwriting results and associated ratios for the
reinsurance segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
-51-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
136.6 |
|
|
$ |
118.1 |
|
|
$ |
357.2 |
|
|
$ |
318.4 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
136.0 |
|
|
|
117.8 |
|
|
|
356.7 |
|
|
|
318.0 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
123.8 |
|
|
|
110.8 |
|
|
|
245.9 |
|
|
|
218.3 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
54.9 |
|
|
$ |
56.8 |
|
|
$ |
131.2 |
|
|
$ |
111.9 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
Underwriting income |
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
39.5 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
44.4 |
% |
|
|
51.2 |
% |
|
|
53.4 |
% |
|
|
51.3 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
Expense ratio |
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
30.1 |
% |
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
|
30.3 |
% |
Combined ratio |
|
|
74.2 |
% |
|
|
81.3 |
% |
|
|
84.0 |
% |
|
|
81.6 |
% |
Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Premiums. Gross premiums written increased by $18.5 million, or 15.7%, for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in gross premiums written was
primarily due to one of our professional liability reinsurance treaties that was previously written
in the third quarter of 2009 for $16.5 million and was renewed in the second quarter of 2010 for
$10.9 million causing higher gross premiums written during the three months ended June 30, 2010
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. The
increase was partially offset by the
non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which included inadequate
pricing and/or terms and conditions), increased competition and increased cedent retention.
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, our Bermuda, U.S., Singapore and European
reinsurance operations had gross premiums written of $69.4 million, $57.7 million, $5.8 million and
$3.7 million, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, our Bermuda, U.S.,
Singapore and European reinsurance operations had gross premiums written of $72.6 million, $40.7
million, nil, and $4.8 million, respectively.
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Property reinsurance |
|
$ |
53.1 |
|
|
$ |
42.5 |
|
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
% |
International reinsurance |
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
(27.7 |
) |
General casualty reinsurance |
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
116.8 |
|
Professional liability reinsurance |
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
Specialty reinsurance |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
Facultative reinsurance |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
136.6 |
|
|
$ |
118.1 |
|
|
$ |
18.5 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written increased by $18.2 million, or 15.4%, which is consistent with the
increase in gross premiums written. Net premiums earned increased $13.0 million, or 11.7%, due to
the increase in net premiums written. Premiums related to our reinsurance business earn at a slower
rate than those related to our direct insurance business. Direct insurance premiums typically earn
ratably over the term of a policy. Reinsurance premiums under a quota share reinsurance contract
are typically earned over the same period as the underlying policies, or risks, covered by the
contract. As a result, the earning pattern of a quota share reinsurance contract may extend up to
24 months, reflecting the inception dates of the underlying policies. Property catastrophe premiums
and premiums for other treaties written on a losses occurring basis earn ratably over the term of
the reinsurance contract.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses decreased by $1.9 million, or 3.3%,
for the three months ended June 30,
-52-
2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in net losses and loss
expenses is primarily due to higher net favorable reserve development recognized during the three
months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 partially offset by the growth of
the reinsurance operations and $3.0 million of losses incurred from the hail storms in Australia.
Overall, our reinsurance segment recorded net favorable reserve development of $20.0 million and
$9.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as shown in the
tables below. In the tables, a negative number represents net favorable reserve development and a
positive number represents net unfavorable reserve development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Property reinsurance |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
International reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
General casualty reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
Professional liability reinsurance |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
Specialty reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Facultative reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Property reinsurance |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
International reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
General casualty reinsurance |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
Professional liability reinsurance |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Specialty reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Facultative reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss and loss expense ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was 44.4%,
compared to 51.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Net favorable reserve development
recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2010 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by
16.2 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current loss year was
60.6%. In comparison, net favorable reserve development recognized in the three months ended June
30, 2009 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 8.4 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss
expense ratio related to that loss year was 59.6%.
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
-53-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, April 1 |
|
$ |
1,185.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,088.5 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
74.9 |
|
|
|
66.1 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
54.9 |
|
|
$ |
56.8 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
40.4 |
|
|
$ |
41.4 |
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
1,199.5 |
|
|
|
1,103.9 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
1,199.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,106.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs increased by $0.3 million, or 1.4%, for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009 primarily as a result
of higher net premiums earned. The acquisition cost ratio was 17.9% for the three months ended June
30, 2010, compared to 19.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in the
acquisition cost ratio is due to more business written on an excess-of-loss basis, which typically
carries a lower acquisition cost ratio than quota share business.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $3.3
million, or 28.7%, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the three months ended June
30, 2009. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to an increase in
salary and related costs included stock-based compensation. The 1.4 percentage point increase in
the general and administrative expense ratio from 10.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 to
11.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was due to higher general and administrative
expenses partially offset by higher net premiums earned.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Premiums. Gross premiums written increased by $38.8 million, or 12.2%, for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in gross premiums written was
primarily due to increased writings in our property reinsurance line of business and the timing of
renewals of two treaties, a quota share reinsurance treaty for $23.6 million in our property
reinsurance line of business and a quota share reinsurance treaty for $10.9 million in
our professional liability reinsurance line of business. The property reinsurance treaty was
originally bound during in the third quarter of 2009 for $9.0 million and expired on November 30,
2009. The renewed treaty is effective from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010. The professional
liability reinsurance treaty was previously written in the third quarter of 2009 for $16.5 million
and was renewed in the second quarter of 2010 for $10.9 million. These increases were partially
offset by the non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which
included inadequate pricing and/or terms and conditions), increased competition, increased cedent
retention and a reduction in adjustments on estimated premiums of $4.4 million. We recognized net
downward adjustments of $2.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to net
upward adjustments of $2.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009. We also had a
reduction of renewed premiums in our U.S. general casualty line of business of $27.5 million
primarily due to lowering our participation on several treaties.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, our Bermuda, U.S., Singapore and European
reinsurance operations had gross premiums written of $149.6 million, $171.5 million, $9.5 million,
and $26.6 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, our Bermuda, U.S.,
Singapore and European reinsurance operations had gross premiums written of $133.8 million, $169.5
million, nil and $15.1 million, respectively.
-54-
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Property reinsurance |
|
$ |
113.8 |
|
|
$ |
71.4 |
|
|
$ |
42.4 |
|
|
|
59.4 |
% |
General casualty reinsurance |
|
|
89.3 |
|
|
|
103.3 |
|
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
International reinsurance |
|
|
68.1 |
|
|
|
61.7 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Professional liability reinsurance |
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
56.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Specialty reinsurance |
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Facultative reinsurance |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
357.2 |
|
|
$ |
318.4 |
|
|
$ |
38.8 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written increased by $38.7 million, or 12.2%, which is consistent with the
increase in gross premiums written. Net premiums earned increased $27.6 million, or 12.6%, due to
the increase in net premiums written.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses increased by $19.3 million, or
17.2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
increase in net losses and loss expenses was primarily due to higher loss activity of $20.0 million
from the earthquake in Chile, the European Windstorm Xynthia, and the hail storms in Australia,
partially offset by higher net favorable reserve development. Overall, our reinsurance segment
recorded net favorable reserve development of $32.7 million and $21.3 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as shown in the tables below. In the tables, a
negative number represents net favorable reserve development and a positive number represents net
unfavorable reserve development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Property reinsurance |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
(7.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.3 |
) |
International reinsurance |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
General casualty reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
Professional liability reinsurance |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
Specialty reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
Facultative reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(32.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reserve Development by Loss Year |
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Property reinsurance |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.5 |
) |
International reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
General casualty reinsurance |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
Professional liability reinsurance |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
Specialty reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Facultative reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss and loss expense ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was 53.4%,
compared to 51.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Net favorable reserve development
recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2010 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by
13.3 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current loss year was
66.7%. In comparison, net favorable reserve development recognized in the six months ended June 30,
2009 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 9.8 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss
expense ratio related to that loss year was 61.1%. The increase in the loss and loss expense ratio
for the current loss year was primarily due to net incurred losses of $20.0 million noted above,
which contributed 8.1 percentage points to the current loss years loss and loss expense ratio.
-55-
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, January 1 |
|
$ |
1,149.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,072.1 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
148.9 |
|
|
|
133.2 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(31.3 |
) |
|
|
(20.9 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
131.2 |
|
|
$ |
111.9 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
76.0 |
|
|
|
67.4 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
81.5 |
|
|
$ |
80.1 |
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
1,199.5 |
|
|
|
1,103.9 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
1,199.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,106.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs increased by $2.5 million, or 5.8%, for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily as a result of
higher net premiums earned. The acquisition cost ratio was 18.7% for the six months ended June 30,
2010, compared to 19.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in the acquisition
cost ratio is due to more business written on an excess-of-loss basis, which typically carries a
lower acquisition cost ratio than quota share business.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $6.6
million, or 29.1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30,
2009. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to an increase in
salary and related costs included stock-based compensation. The 1.5 percentage point increase in
the general and administrative expense ratio from 10.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 to
11.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was due to higher general and administrative expenses
partially offset by higher net premiums earned.
Reserves for Losses and Loss Expenses
Reserves for losses and loss expenses by segment as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
were comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Insurance |
|
|
International Insurance |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Case reserves |
|
$ |
317.0 |
|
|
$ |
268.1 |
|
|
$ |
561.4 |
|
|
$ |
570.4 |
|
|
$ |
323.8 |
|
|
$ |
313.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,202.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,152.0 |
|
IBNR |
|
|
1,066.7 |
|
|
|
985.6 |
|
|
|
1,776.1 |
|
|
|
1,786.0 |
|
|
|
875.4 |
|
|
|
838.2 |
|
|
|
3,718.2 |
|
|
|
3,609.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses |
|
|
1,383.7 |
|
|
|
1,253.7 |
|
|
|
2,337.5 |
|
|
|
2,356.4 |
|
|
|
1,199.2 |
|
|
|
1,151.7 |
|
|
|
4,920.4 |
|
|
|
4,761.8 |
|
Reinsurance recoverables |
|
|
(378.0 |
) |
|
|
(351.8 |
) |
|
|
(554.7 |
) |
|
|
(566.3 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(932.4 |
) |
|
|
(920.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
1,005.7 |
|
|
$ |
901.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,782.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,790.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,199.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,149.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,998.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,841.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We participate in certain lines of business where claims may not be reported for many
years. Accordingly, management does not solely rely upon reported claims on these lines for
estimating ultimate liabilities. We also use statistical and actuarial methods to estimate expected
ultimate losses and loss expenses. Loss reserves do not represent an exact calculation of
liability. Rather, loss reserves are estimates of what we expect the ultimate resolution and
administration of claims will cost. These estimates are based on various factors including
underwriters expectations about loss experience, actuarial analysis, comparisons with the results
of industry benchmarks and loss experience to date. Loss reserve estimates are refined as
experience develops and as claims are reported and
-56-
resolved. Establishing an appropriate level of loss reserves is an inherently uncertain process.
Ultimate losses and loss expenses may differ from our reserves, possibly by material amounts.
The following tables provide our ranges of loss and loss expense reserve estimates by business
segment as of June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for Losses and Loss Expenses |
|
|
Gross of Reinsurance Recoverable(1) |
|
|
Carried |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
|
Reserves |
|
Estimate |
|
Estimate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
U.S. insurance |
|
$ |
1,383.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,151.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,492.8 |
|
International insurance |
|
|
2,337.5 |
|
|
|
1,759.5 |
|
|
|
2,683.1 |
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
1,199.2 |
|
|
|
905.5 |
|
|
|
1,447.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for Losses and Loss Expenses |
|
|
Net of Reinsurance Recoverable(2) |
|
|
Carried |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
|
Reserves |
|
Estimate |
|
Estimate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
U.S. insurance |
|
$ |
1,005.7 |
|
|
$ |
809.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,070.6 |
|
International insurance |
|
|
1,782.8 |
|
|
|
1,334.8 |
|
|
|
2,049.5 |
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
1,199.5 |
|
|
|
904.9 |
|
|
|
1,445.3 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For statistical reasons, it is not appropriate to add together the ranges of each business
segment in an effort to determine the low and high range around the consolidated loss
reserves. On a gross basis, the consolidated low estimate is $4,080.8 million and the
consolidated high estimate is $5,358.4 million. |
|
(2) |
|
For statistical reasons, it is not appropriate to add together the ranges of each business
segment in an effort to determine the low and high range around the consolidated loss
reserves. On a net basis, the consolidated low estimate is $3,271.3 million and the
consolidated high estimate is $4,343.3 million. |
Our range for each business segment was determined by utilizing multiple actuarial loss
reserving methods along with various assumptions of reporting patterns and expected loss ratios by
loss year. The various outcomes of these techniques were combined to determine a reasonable range
of required loss and loss expense reserves. While we believe our approach to determine the range of
loss and loss expense is reasonable, there are no assurances that actual loss experience will be
with the ranges of loss and loss expense noted above.
Our selection of the actual carried reserves has typically been above the midpoint of the
range. We believe that we should be prudent in our reserving practices due to the lengthy reporting
patterns and relatively large limits of net liability for any one risk of our direct excess
casualty business and of our casualty reinsurance business. Thus, due to this uncertainty regarding
estimates for reserve for losses and loss expenses, we have carried our consolidated reserve for
losses and loss expenses, net of reinsurance recoverable, above the midpoint of the low and high
estimates for the consolidated net losses and loss expenses. We believe that relying on the more
prudent actuarial indications is appropriate for these lines of business.
Reinsurance Recoverable
The following table illustrates our reinsurance recoverable as of June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance Recoverable |
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31 , |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Ceded case reserves |
|
$ |
247.6 |
|
|
$ |
266.5 |
|
Ceded IBNR reserves |
|
|
684.8 |
|
|
|
653.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable |
|
$ |
932.4 |
|
|
$ |
920.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We remain obligated for amounts ceded in the event our reinsurers do not meet their
obligations. Accordingly, we have evaluated the reinsurers that are providing reinsurance
protection to us and will continue to monitor their credit ratings and financial stability. We
generally have the right to terminate our treaty reinsurance contracts at any time, upon prior
written notice to the reinsurer, under
-57-
specified circumstances, including the assignment to the reinsurer by A.M. Best of a financial
strength rating of less than A-. Approximately 96% of ceded reserves as of June 30, 2010 were
recoverable from reinsurers who had an A.M. Best rating of A- or higher.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
As of June 30, 2010, our shareholders equity was $3.5 billion, a 7.9% increase compared to
$3.2 billion as of December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily the result of net income for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 of $317.7 million driven primarily by strong investment returns.
Holdings is a holding company and transacts no business of its own. Cash flows to Holdings may
comprise dividends, advances and loans from its subsidiary companies. Holdings is therefore reliant
on receiving dividends and other permitted distributions from its subsidiaries to make principal,
interest and/or dividend payments on its senior notes and common shares.
In May 2010, the board of directors of Holdings authorized the company to repurchase up to
$500 million of Holdings common shares through a share repurchase program. Repurchases under the
authorization may be effected from time to time through open market purchases, privately negotiated
transactions, tender offers or otherwise. This authorization is effective through May 3, 2012. The
timing, form and amount of the share repurchases under the program will depend on a variety of
factors, including market conditions, the companys capital position, legal requirements and other
factors. At any time, the repurchase program may be modified, extended or terminated by the board
of directors. As part of the share repurchase program, we entered into a 10b5-1 repurchase plan
that enables us to complete share repurchases during trading blackout periods. During the three
months ended June 30, 2010, we repurchased, through open-market purchases, 1,081,041 shares at a
total cost of $49.1 million, for an average price of $45.41 per share. We have classified these
repurchased shares as Treasury shares, at cost on the consolidated balance sheets.
We believe our companys capital position continues to remain well within the range needed for
our business requirements and we have sufficient liquidity to fund our ongoing operations.
Restrictions and Specific Requirements
The jurisdictions in which our operating subsidiaries are licensed to write business impose
regulations requiring companies to maintain or meet various defined statutory ratios, including
solvency and liquidity requirements. Some jurisdictions also place restrictions on the declaration
and payment of dividends and other distributions.
The payment of dividends from Holdings Bermuda domiciled operating subsidiary is, under
certain circumstances, limited under Bermuda law, which requires our Bermuda operating subsidiary
to maintain certain measures of solvency and liquidity. Holdings U.S. domiciled operating
subsidiaries are subject to significant regulatory restrictions limiting their ability to declare
and pay dividends. In particular, payments of dividends by Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.)
Inc., Allied World National Assurance Company, Allied World Reinsurance Company, Darwin National
Assurance Company, Darwin Select Insurance Company and Vantapro Specialty Insurance Company are
subject to restrictions on statutory surplus pursuant to the respective states in which these
insurance companies are domiciled. Each state requires prior regulatory approval of any payment of
extraordinary dividends. In addition, Allied World Assurance Company (Europe) Limited and Allied
World Assurance Company (Reinsurance) Limited are subject to significant regulatory restrictions
limiting their ability to declare and pay any dividends without the consent of the Irish Financial
Services Regulatory Authority. We also have insurance subsidiaries that are the parent company for
other insurance subsidiaries, which means that dividends and other distributions will be subject to
multiple layers of regulations in order to dividend funds to Holdings. The inability of the
subsidiaries of Holdings to pay dividends and other permitted distributions could have a material
adverse effect on Holdings cash requirements and ability to make principal, interest and dividend
payments on its senior notes and common shares.
Holdings insurance and reinsurance subsidiary in Bermuda, Allied World Assurance Company,
Ltd, is neither licensed nor admitted as an insurer, nor is it accredited as a reinsurer, in any
jurisdiction in the United States. As a result, it is generally required to post collateral
security with respect to any reinsurance liabilities it assumes from ceding insurers domiciled in
the United States in order for U.S. ceding companies to obtain credit on their U.S. statutory
financial statements with respect to insurance liabilities ceded to them. Under applicable
statutory provisions, the security arrangements may be in the form of letters of credit,
reinsurance trusts maintained by trustees or funds-withheld arrangements where assets are held by
the ceding company.
-58-
Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd uses trust accounts primarily to meet security
requirements for inter-company and certain reinsurance transactions. We also have cash and cash
equivalents and investments on deposit with various state or government insurance departments or
pledged in favor of ceding companies in order to comply with relevant insurance regulations. In
addition, Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd currently has access to up to $1.7 billion in letters
of credit under two letter of credit facilities, one with Citibank Europe plc and one with a
syndication of lenders described below. The credit facility with Citibank Europe plc was amended in
December 2008 to provide us with greater flexibility in the types of securities that are eligible
to be posted as collateral and to increase the maximum aggregate amount available under the credit
facility from $750 million to $900 million on an uncommitted basis. These facilities are used to
provide security to reinsureds and are collateralized by us, at least to the extent of letters of
credit outstanding at any given time. The letters of credit issued under the credit facility with
Citibank Europe plc are deemed to be automatically extended without amendment for twelve months
from the expiry date, or any future expiration date unless at least 30 days prior to any expiration
date Citibank Europe plc notifies us that they elect not to consider the letters of credit renewed
for any such additional period. If Citibank Europe plc no longer provides capacity under the credit
facility it may limit our ability to meet our security requirements and would require us to obtain
other sources of security at terms that may not be favorable to us.
In November 2007, we entered into an $800 million five-year senior credit facility (the
Facility) with a syndication of lenders. The Facility consists of a $400 million secured letter
of credit facility for the issuance of standby letters of credit (the Secured Facility) and a
$400 million unsecured facility for the making of revolving loans and for the issuance of standby
letters of credit (the Unsecured Facility). Both the Secured Facility and the Unsecured Facility
have options to increase the aggregate commitments by up to $200 million, subject to approval of
the lenders. The Facility will be used for general corporate purposes and to issue standby letters
of credit. The Facility contains representations, warranties and covenants customary for similar
bank loan facilities, including a covenant to maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to
total capitalization as of the last day of each fiscal quarter or fiscal year of not greater than
0.35 to 1.0 and a covenant under the Unsecured Facility to maintain a certain consolidated net
worth. In addition, each material insurance subsidiary must maintain a financial strength rating
from A.M. Best Company of at least A- under the Unsecured Facility and of at least B++ under
the Secured Facility. As of June 30, 2010, we had a consolidated indebtedness to total
capitalization of 0.14 to 1.0 and all of our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries had a financial
strength rating from A.M. Best of A. The Unsecured Facility required a minimum net worth as of
June 30, 2010 of $1.4 billion and our net worth as calculated according to the Unsecured Facility
was $3.3 billion as of June 30, 2010. Based on the results of these financial calculations, we were
in compliance with all covenants under the Facility as of June 30, 2010.
There are a total of 13 lenders that make up the Facility syndication and that have varying
commitments ranging from $20.0 million to $87.5 million. Of the 13 lenders, four have commitments
of $87.5 million each, four have commitments of $62.5 million each, four have commitments of $45.0
million each and one has a commitment of $20.0 million. The one lender in the Facility with a $20.0
million commitment has declared bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. This
lender did not meet its commitment under the Facility. In July 2010, we replaced this bankrupt
lender with another lender for the full $20.0 million commitment under the Facility.
On November 19, 2008, Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd requested a $250 million
borrowing under the Unsecured Facility. We requested the borrowing to ensure the preservation of
our financial flexibility in light of the uncertainty in the credit markets. On November 21, 2008,
we received $243.8 million of loan proceeds from the borrowing, as $6.3 million was not received
from the lender in bankruptcy. The interest rate on the borrowing was 2.588%. We repaid the loan on
its maturity date of February 23, 2009.
Security arrangements with ceding insurers may subject our assets to security interests or
require that a portion of our assets be pledged to, or otherwise held by, third parties. Both of
our letter of credit facilities are fully collateralized by assets held in custodial accounts at
the Bank of New York Mellon held for the benefit of the banks. Although the investment income
derived from our assets while held in trust accrues to our benefit, the investment of these assets
is governed by the terms of the letter of credit facilities or the investment regulations of the
state or territory of domicile of the ceding insurer, which may be more restrictive than the
investment regulations applicable to us under Bermuda law. The restrictions may result in lower
investment yields on these assets, which may adversely affect our profitability.
The following shows our trust accounts on deposit, as well as outstanding and remaining
letters of credit facilities and the collateral committed to support the letters of credit
facilities as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
-59-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Total trust accounts on deposit |
|
$ |
1,385.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,025.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total letters of credit facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citibank Europe plc |
|
|
900.0 |
|
|
|
900.0 |
|
Credit Facility |
|
|
800.0 |
|
|
|
800.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total letters of credit facilities |
|
|
1,700.0 |
|
|
|
1,700.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total letters of credit facilities outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citibank Europe plc |
|
|
765.2 |
|
|
|
794.6 |
|
Credit Facility |
|
|
206.5 |
|
|
|
376.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total letters of credit facilities outstanding |
|
|
971.7 |
|
|
|
1,171.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total letters of credit facilities remaining: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citibank Europe plc |
|
|
134.8 |
|
|
|
105.4 |
|
Credit Facility(1) |
|
|
593.5 |
|
|
|
423.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total letters of credit facilities remaining |
|
|
728.3 |
|
|
|
528.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral committed to support the letter of credit facilities |
|
$ |
1,223.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,208.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net of any borrowing or repayments under the Unsecured Facility. |
As of June 30, 2010, we had a combined unused letters of credit capacity of $728.3 million
from the Facility and Citibank Europe plc. We believe that this remaining capacity is
sufficient to meet our future letter of credit needs.
We have filed a shelf-registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-148409) with the SEC in
which we may offer from time to time common shares, preference shares, depository shares
representing common shares or preference shares, senior or subordinated debt securities, warrants
to purchase common shares, preference shares and debt securities, share purchase contracts, share
purchase units and units which may consist of any combination of the securities listed above. The
proceeds from any issuance may be used for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and
other general corporate purposes.
We do not currently anticipate that the restrictions on liquidity resulting from restrictions
on the payment of dividends by our subsidiary companies or from assets committed in trust accounts
or to collateralize the letter of credit facilities will have a material impact on our ability to
carry out our normal business activities, including interest and dividend payments, respectively,
on our senior notes and common shares.
Sources and Uses of Funds
Our sources of funds primarily consist of premium receipts net of commissions, investment
income, net proceeds from capital raising activities that may include the issuance of common
shares, senior notes and other debt or equity issuances, and proceeds from sales and redemption of
investments. Cash is used primarily to pay losses and loss expenses, purchase reinsurance, pay
general and administrative expenses and taxes, and pay dividends and interest, with the remainder
made available to our investment portfolio managers for investment in accordance with our
investment policy.
Cash flows from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were $305.6 million compared
to $402.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in cash flows from
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009
was primarily due to an increase in insurance balances receivable primarily related to a funds held
balance of $73.9 million for a property catastrophe reinsurance treaty entered into in the first
half of 2010. The funds held balance can be used by the cedent to pay claims, if any. Any balance
remaining after the expiry of the reinsurance treaty is returned to us. Also contributing to the
decrease in cash flow from operations was higher net losses paid and higher payouts on year-end
incentive compensation.
Cash flows from investing activities consist primarily of proceeds on the sale of investments
and payments for investments acquired in addition to an increase in restricted cash. We had cash
flows used in investing activities of $87.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared
to $147.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in cash flows used in
investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June
30, 2009 was primarily due to the lower cash flows from operations, which are reinvested into
investment securities.
-60-
Cash flows from financing activities consist primarily of capital raising activities, which
include the issuance of common shares or debt and the payment of
dividends or the repayment of debt. Cash flows used in
financing activities were $65.6 million for six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $436.4
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in cash flows used in financing
activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009
was primarily due to the repayment of our syndicated loan in 2009 partially offset by the share
repurchase program, which began during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
On August 5, 2010, our board of directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share, or
approximately $9.9 million in aggregate, payable on September 9, 2010 to the shareholders of record
as of August 24, 2010.
Our funds are primarily invested in liquid, high-grade fixed income securities. As of June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, 96.3% and 97.6%, respectively, of our fixed income portfolio consisted
of investment grade securities. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, net accumulated
unrealized gains on our available for sale fixed maturity investments were $138.2 million and
$149.8 million, respectively. The reduction in the unrealized gains is primarily due to selling
certain available for sale securities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and reinvesting the
proceeds in fixed maturity investments where mark-to-market changes are reflected in the
consolidated income statement. We expect this trend to continue for the remainder of 2010. The
maturity distribution of our fixed income portfolio (on a fair value basis) as of June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
399.5 |
|
|
$ |
156.3 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
3,676.0 |
|
|
|
3,221.7 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
611.3 |
|
|
|
1,166.9 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
110.9 |
|
|
|
172.4 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
1,564.1 |
|
|
|
1,721.3 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
669.9 |
|
|
|
532.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,031.8 |
|
|
$ |
6,971.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have investments in various hedge funds, the market value of which was $319.6 million as of
June 30, 2010. Each of the hedge funds has redemption notice requirements. For each of our hedge
funds, liquidity is allowed after certain defined periods based on the terms of each hedge fund.
See Note 4(d) to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional details
on our hedge fund investments.
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our consolidated results of
operations. The potential exists, after a catastrophe loss, for the development of inflationary
pressures in a local economy. The effects of inflation are considered implicitly in pricing. Loss
reserves are established to recognize likely loss settlements at the date payment is made. Those
reserves inherently recognize the effects of inflation. The actual effects of inflation on our
results cannot be accurately known, however, until claims are ultimately resolved.
Financial Strength Ratings
Financial strength ratings represent the opinions of rating agencies on our capacity to meet
our obligations. The rating agencies consider a number of quantitative and qualitative factors in
determining an insurance companys financial strength ratings. Quantitative considerations of an
insurance company include the evaluation of financial statements, historical operating results and,
through the use of proprietary capital models, the measure of investment and insurance risks
relative to capital. Among the qualitative considerations are management strength, business
profile, market conditions and established risk management practices used, among other things, to
manage risk exposures and limit capital volatility. Some of our reinsurance treaties contain
special funding and termination clauses that are triggered in the event that we or one of our
subsidiaries is downgraded by one of the major rating agencies to levels specified in the treaties,
or our capital is significantly reduced. If such an event were to happen, we would be required, in
certain instances, to post collateral in the form of letters of credit and/or trust accounts
against existing outstanding losses, if any, related to the treaty. In a limited number of
instances, the subject treaties could be cancelled retroactively or commuted by the cedent and
might affect our ability to write business.
-61-
The following were the financial strength ratings of all of our insurance and reinsurance
subsidiaries as of July 30, 2010, except as noted below:
|
|
|
A.M. Best
|
|
A/stable |
Moodys*
|
|
A2/stable |
Standard & Poors**
|
|
A-/positive |
|
|
|
* |
|
Moodys financial strength ratings are for Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd, Allied World
Assurance Company (U.S.) Inc., Allied World National Assurance Company and Allied World
Reinsurance Company only. Moodys revised its outlook from negative to stable on June 30,
2009. |
|
** |
|
Standard & Poors financial strength ratings are for Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd,
Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.) Inc., Allied World National Assurance Company, Allied
World Reinsurance Company, Allied World Assurance Company (Europe) Limited and Allied World
Assurance Company (Reinsurance) Limited only. Standard & Poors revised its outlook from
stable to positive on June 24, 2010. |
We believe that the quantitative and qualitative factors that influence our ratings are
supportive of our ratings.
Long-Term Debt
On July 21, 2006, we issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.50% senior notes
due August 1, 2016, with interest payable August 1 and February 1 each year, commencing February 1,
2007. We can redeem the senior notes prior to maturity, subject to payment of a make-whole
premium, however, we currently have no intention of redeeming the notes.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2010, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We believe that we are principally exposed to three types of market risk: interest rate risk,
credit risk and currency risk.
The fixed income securities in our investment portfolio are subject to interest rate risk and
credit risk. Any changes in interest rates and credit spreads have a direct effect on the market
values of fixed income securities. As interest rates rise, the market values fall, and vice versa.
As credit spreads widen, the market values fall, and vice versa.
The changes in market values as a result of changes in interest rates is determined by
calculating hypothetical June 30, 2010 ending prices based on yields adjusted to reflect the
hypothetical changes in interest rates, comparing such hypothetical ending prices to actual ending
prices, and multiplying the difference by the principal amount of the security. The sensitivity
analysis is based on estimates. The estimated changes of our fixed maturity investments and cash
and cash equivalents are presented below and actual changes for interest rate shifts could differ
significantly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Shift in Basis Points |
|
|
-200 |
|
-100 |
|
-50 |
|
0 |
|
+50 |
|
+100 |
|
+200 |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Total market value |
|
$ |
7,828.1 |
|
|
$ |
7,742.9 |
|
|
$ |
7,666.0 |
|
|
$ |
7,575.7 |
|
|
$ |
7,478.8 |
|
|
$ |
7,382.0 |
|
|
$ |
7,187.6 |
|
Market value change from base |
|
|
252.4 |
|
|
|
167.2 |
|
|
|
90.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(96.9 |
) |
|
|
(193.7 |
) |
|
|
(388.1 |
) |
Change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
|
(5.1 |
)% |
The changes in market values as a result of changes in credit spreads are determined by
calculating hypothetical June 30, 2010 ending prices adjusted to reflect the hypothetical changes
in credit spreads, comparing such hypothetical ending prices to actual ending prices, and
multiplying the difference by the principal amount of the security. The sensitivity analysis is
based on estimates. The estimated changes of our non-cash, non-U.S. treasury fixed maturity
investments are presented below and actual changes in credit spreads could differ significantly.
-62-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Spread Shift in Basis Points |
|
|
-200 |
|
-100 |
|
-50 |
|
0 |
|
+50 |
|
+100 |
|
+200 |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Total market value |
|
$ |
5,738.3 |
|
|
$ |
5,596.5 |
|
|
$ |
5,525.7 |
|
|
$ |
5,454.8 |
|
|
$ |
5,383.9 |
|
|
$ |
5,313.1 |
|
|
$ |
5,171.3 |
|
Market value change from base |
|
|
283.5 |
|
|
|
141.7 |
|
|
|
70.9 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(70.9 |
) |
|
|
(141.7 |
) |
|
|
(283.5 |
) |
Change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
|
|
(2.6 |
)% |
|
|
(5.2 |
)% |
As a holder of fixed income securities, we also have exposure to credit risk. In an
effort to minimize this risk, our investment guidelines have been defined to ensure that the assets
held are well diversified and are primarily high-quality securities. As of June 30, 2010 we held
assets totaling $7.0 billion of fixed income securities. Of those assets, approximately 3.7% were
rated below investment grade (Ba1/BB+ or lower) with the remaining 96.3% rated in the investment
grade category. The average credit quality of the investment grade portfolios was AA by S&P.
As of June 30, 2010 we held $2,392.0 million, or 30.0%, of our total investments and cash and
cash equivalents in corporate bonds, $1,038.2 million of which were issued by entities within the
financial services industry. These corporate bonds had an average credit rating of AA- by Standards
& Poors.
As of June 30, 2010, we held $1,564.1 million, or 19.7%, of our total investments and cash and
cash equivalents in mortgage-backed securities, which included agency pass-through mortgage-backed
securities, non-agency mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities. The
agency pass-through mortgage-backed securities, non-agency mortgage-backed securities and
commercial mortgage-backed securities represented 12.1%, 5.1% and 2.5%, respectively, of our total
investments and cash and cash equivalents. In addition, 99.8% of our commercial mortgage-backed
securities and 64.5% of our core non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities, of $183.2
million, were rated AAA by Standard & Poors and Fitch as of June 30, 2010. These agency
pass-through mortgage-backed securities are exposed to prepayment risk, which occurs when holders
of individual mortgages increase the frequency with which they prepay the outstanding principal
before the maturity date to refinance at a lower interest rate cost. Given the proportion that
these securities comprise of the overall portfolio, and the current interest rate environment and
condition of the credit market, prepayment risk is not considered significant at this time.
Additionally as of June 30, 2010, we held $223.3 million of high yield (below investment
grade) non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities, which is included in the $1,564.1 million
referenced in the preceding paragraph. As of June 30, 2010, 89.6% of those assets were rated below
investment grade, and the average credit rating of this below investment grade portfolio was CCC+
by S&P.
As of June 30, 2010, we held investments in hedge funds with a fair value of $319.6 million.
Investments in hedge funds involve certain risks related to, among other things, the illiquid
nature of the fund shares, the limited operating history of the fund, as well as risks associated
with the strategies employed by the managers of the funds. The funds objectives are generally to
seek attractive long-term returns with lower volatility by investing in a range of diversified
investment strategies. As our reserves and capital continue to build, we may consider additional
investments in these or other alternative investments.
The U.S. dollar is our reporting currency and the functional currency of all of our operating
subsidiaries. We enter into insurance and reinsurance contracts where the premiums receivable and
losses payable are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. In addition, we maintain a
portion of our investments and liabilities in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily
Euro, British Sterling and the Canadian dollar. Assets in non-U.S. currencies are generally
converted into U.S. dollars at the time of receipt. When we incur a liability in a non-U.S.
currency, we carry such liability on our books in the original currency. These liabilities are
converted from the non-U.S. currency to U.S. dollars at the time of payment. As a result, we have
an exposure to foreign currency risk resulting from fluctuations in exchange rates.
As of June 30, 2010 and 2009, 2.2% and 1.9%, respectively, of our aggregate invested assets
were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Of our business written during the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, approximately 12% and 11% was written in currencies other than
the U.S. dollar, respectively. We utilize a hedging strategy whose objective is to minimize the
potential loss of value caused by currency fluctuations by using foreign currency forward contract
derivatives that expire in approximately 90 days from purchase.
Our foreign exchange loss/gain for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and the year
ended December 31, 2009 are set forth in the chart below.
-63-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Realized exchange (loss) gain |
|
$ |
(4.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.7 |
) |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
Unrealized exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange (loss) gain |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report, our management has performed an
evaluation, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) as of June 30, 2010. Disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or
submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified by SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow for
timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2010, our companys disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified by SEC rules and forms and accumulated and communicated to management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow for
timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not
expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting
will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated,
can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are
met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of
the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide an absolute
assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been
detected.
No changes were made in our internal controls over financial reporting, as such term is
defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are and in the future may become involved in various claims and legal proceedings that
arise in the normal course of our business. While any claim or legal proceeding contains an
element of uncertainty, we do not currently believe that any claim or legal proceeding to which we
are presently a party to is likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Our business is subject to a number of risks, including those identified in Item 1A. of Part I
of our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2010, that could have a
material effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity and
that could cause our operating results to vary significantly from period to period. The risks
described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also could have
a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.
-64-
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
(c) |
|
The following table summarizes our repurchases of our common shares during the three
months ended June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Dollar Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
(or Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Value) of Shares that May |
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
Average Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Yet be Purchased Under |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Programs1 |
|
|
the Plans or Programs |
|
April 1 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
May 1 31, 2010 |
|
|
666,700 |
|
|
|
44.75 |
|
|
|
666,700 |
|
|
|
470,167,936 |
|
June 1 30, 2010 |
|
|
414,341 |
|
|
|
46.48 |
|
|
|
414,341 |
|
|
|
450,910,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,081,041 |
|
|
$ |
45.41 |
|
|
|
1,081,041 |
|
|
$ |
450,910,510 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On May 6, 2010, our board of directors authorized us to repurchase up to $500 million of
our common shares through a share repurchase program. Repurchases under the authorization
may be effected from time to time through open market purchases, privately negotiated
transactions, tender offers or otherwise. This authorization is effective through May 3,
2012. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Other Information.
None.
Item 5. Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101.1**
|
|
Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as
of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, (iii) the Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, (iv) the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and (v) the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. |
|
|
|
* |
|
These certifications are being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18 United States
Code) and are not being filed as part of this report. |
|
** |
|
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in Exhibit 101.1 to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or
prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, is deemed not filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and otherwise is not subject to liability under
these sections. |
-65-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 6, 2010
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Scott A. Carmilani |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Scott A. Carmilani |
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 6, 2010
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Joan H. Dillard
Joan H. Dillard
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
-66-
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101.1**
|
|
Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as
of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, (iii) the Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, (iv) the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and (v) the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. |
|
|
|
* |
|
These certifications are being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18 United States
Code) and are not being filed as part of this report. |
|
** |
|
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in Exhibit 101.1 to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or
prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, is deemed not filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and otherwise is not subject to liability under
these sections. |
-67-