e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
January 29,
2011
|
|
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number 1-34536
rue21, inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
25-1311645
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
800 Commonwealth Drive
Suite 100
Warrendale, Pennsylvania
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
15086
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(724) 776-9780
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
(Title of class)
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market
(Name of each exchange where registered)
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant as of July 31, 2010 was
$458,727,450.
The number of shares of the registrants common stock
outstanding as of March 15, 2011 was 24,384,507.
Documents
Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the registrants Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 10, 2011
(hereinafter referred to as the 2011 Proxy
Statement) are incorporated by reference into
Part III.
Special
Note on Forward-looking Statements
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks
and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of
historical fact included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give
our current expectations and projections relating to our
financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives,
future performance and business. You can identify
forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate
strictly to historical or current facts. These statements may
include words such as anticipate,
estimate, expect, project,
plan, intend, believe,
may, will, should, can
have, likely and other words and terms of
similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing
or nature of future operating or financial performance or other
events. For example, all statements we make relating to our
estimated and projected earnings, revenues, costs, expenditures,
cash flows, growth rates and financial results, our plans and
objectives for future operations, growth or initiatives,
strategies, or the expected outcome or impact of pending or
threatened litigation are forward-looking statements. The
information contained in forward-looking statements is subject
to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to
differ materially from those that we expected, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to identify and respond to new and changing fashion
trends, customer preferences and other related factors;
|
|
|
|
our failure to successfully execute our growth strategy, due to
delays in store growth and store conversions, difficulties
executing sales and operating profit margin initiatives and
inventory shrinkage prevention;
|
|
|
|
the failure of our new stores or the conversion of our existing
stores to achieve sales and operating levels consistent with our
expectations;
|
|
|
|
risks and challenges in connection with sourcing merchandise
from third party domestic and foreign vendors, including the
risk that current or prospective vendors may be unable or
unwilling to supply us with adequate quantities of their
merchandise in a timely manner or at acceptable prices;
|
|
|
|
our level of success in gaining and maintaining broad market
acceptance of our exclusive brands;
|
|
|
|
our failure to protect our brand image;
|
|
|
|
economic conditions, and their effect on the financial and
capital markets, our vendors and business partners, employment
levels, consumer demand, spending patterns, inflation and the
cost of goods;
|
|
|
|
our loss of key personnel or our inability to hire additional
personnel;
|
|
|
|
seasonality of our business;
|
|
|
|
increases in costs of raw materials for our merchandise, fuel,
or other energy, transportation or utilities costs and in the
costs of labor and employment;
|
|
|
|
the impact of governmental laws and regulations and the outcomes
of legal proceedings;
|
|
|
|
disruptions in our supply chain and distribution facility;
|
|
|
|
damage or interruption to our information systems;
|
|
|
|
changes in the competitive environment in our industry and the
markets in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
natural disasters, unusually adverse weather conditions,
pandemic outbreaks, boycotts and geo-political events;
|
|
|
|
the incurrence of material uninsured losses or excessive
insurance costs; and
|
|
|
|
our failure to maintain effective internal controls.
|
We derive many of our forward-looking statements from our
operating budgets and forecasts, which are based upon many
detailed assumptions. While we believe that our assumptions are
reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the
impact of known factors, and, it is impossible for us to
anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from our expectations, or
1
cautionary statements, are disclosed under Risk
Factors and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to
us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in
their entirety by the cautionary statements as well as other
cautionary statements that are made from time to time in our
other Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and
public communications. You should evaluate all forward-looking
statements made in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
in the context of these risks and uncertainties. We caution you
that the important factors referenced above may not contain all
of the factors that are important to you. In addition, we cannot
assure you that we will realize the results or developments we
expect or anticipate or, even if substantially realized, that
they will result in the consequences we anticipate or affect us
or our operations in the way we expect. The forward-looking
statements included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation
to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as
otherwise required by law.
2
rue21,
inc.
2010 ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3
Part I
Our
Company
rue21, inc. (rue21) was originally incorporated in Pennsylvania
in October 1976. We changed our name to rue21, inc. in May 2003
and reincorporated in Delaware on October 30, 2009. rue21
is a fast growing specialty apparel retailer offering the newest
fashion trends to girls and guys at value prices. At the end of
fiscal year 2010, we operated 638 stores in 44 states. Our
merchandise is designed to appeal to 11 to 17 year olds who
aspire to be 21 and adults who want to look and feel
21. We react quickly to market trends and our daily
shipments ensure there is always new merchandise for our
customers to discover. In addition, we offer our own brands,
such as rue21 etc!, Carbon, and tarea, to create merchandise
excitement and differentiation in our stores. The energy in our
stores and our focus on customer service, combined with our
great value products, keep our customers returning to us.
Through viral marketing and our interactive website, we continue
to build a rueCommunity with a loyal customer base that will
drive our growth into the future. The company and customer
culture we have created invokes only one simple thought in the
minds of most... Do you rue? I do!
We pursue a three-pronged strategy that focuses on
diversification and growth. The key elements of our strategy are:
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Product girls, guys, rue21 etc!
We offer a broad range of girls and guys apparel, and
accessories, including footwear, jewelry and fragrances.
|
|
|
|
Flexible Real Estate strip centers, regional
malls, outlet centers. As of January 29, 2011 approximately
52% of our 638 stores were located in strip centers, 31% in
regional malls and 17% in outlet centers.
|
|
|
|
Balanced Growth new stores, store
conversions, comparable store sales. We drive sales growth
through opening new stores, converting existing stores into our
new, larger rue21 etc! layout, and increasing our comparable
store sales.
|
4
Our
Competitive Strengths
We attribute our success as a specialty apparel retailer to the
following competitive strengths:
|
|
|
|
|
Compelling fashion meets value
proposition. We offer the newest fashion to girls
and guys at prices lower than many other similar apparel
retailers. Our broad product assortment, ranging from apparel to
accessories to footwear, enables our customers to create a
complete look. In addition, we provide our customers with a
distinctive shopping experience in a
fun-to-shop
environment, further enhancing our branded value proposition.
|
|
|
|
Flexible, fast-fashion business model. Our
merchandising model allows us to quickly identify and respond to
trends and bring proven concepts and styles to our stores. Our
sourcing model is designed to achieve lower cost, faster
turnaround and lower inventory levels. Our vendor network
consists of domestic importers and domestic suppliers. Our
collaborative relationship with our vendors allows us to test
small quantities of new products in select stores before broadly
distributing them to our stores which, in turn, reduces markdown
risk. By carrying the newest styles and regularly updating our
floor sets, we provide our customers with a reason to frequently
shop our stores.
|
|
|
|
Attractive new store economics. We operate a
proven and efficient store model that delivers strong cash flow.
Not only do our stores provide a distinctive shopping experience
and compelling merchandise assortment, but with low store
build-out costs, competitive lease terms and a low-cost
operating model, our stores also generate a strong return on
store investment. All of our new stores feature our rue21 etc!
store-in-store
layout, showcasing an expanded accessories offering.
|
|
|
|
Distinct company and customer culture. We have
a strong core culture that emanates from our employees, many of
whom are high school and college students who live in the
community and are rue21 customers. Through our viral marketing
efforts and the support of our online rueCommunity, we bring the
rue21 culture to our customer base. We believe our culture
enables us to connect to our employees and customers,
differentiate our in-store shopping experience and ultimately
strengthen our brand image and drive customer loyalty.
|
|
|
|
Strong and experienced management team. Our
senior management team has extensive experience across a broad
range of disciplines in the specialty retail industry, including
merchandising, real estate, supply chain and finance. Bob Fisch,
our President and Chief Executive Officer, has more than
30 years of experience in the apparel industry. Since being
named President and Chief Executive Officer, the company has
experienced consistent growth in net sales and income from
operations.
|
Our
Growth Strategy
We believe we are positioned to take advantage of significant
opportunities to increase net sales and net income. We continue
to invest significant capital to build the infrastructure
necessary to support our growth. This includes investments in
new planning and allocation systems designed to drive sales and
improve merchandise margins, as well as the continued
implementation of supply chain initiatives that will increase
our ability to efficiently distribute merchandise to our stores.
Key elements of our growth strategy include:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase Square Footage. We intend to drive
our square footage growth by opening new stores and converting
existing stores to our larger rue21 etc! layout. Following a
disciplined real estate strategy, we have increased our
geographic presence by opening 105 new retail stores in fiscal
2010. We operated 638 locations as of January 29, 2011, and
believe there is significant opportunity to expand to over 1,000
stores.
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Most of our new stores will be opened in strip centers and
regional malls in small- and middle-market communities. In
addition, we plan to continue to convert our existing stores
into our larger rue21 etc! layout, which averages approximately
5,000 square feet. This store layout allows us to offer an
increased proportion of higher margin categories, such as
accessories, intimate apparel, footwear and fragrances. As of
January 29, 2011, more than 70% of our store base was in
the rue21 etc! layout. We converted 31 stores to the rue21 etc!
layout in fiscal year 2010 and plan to convert 35 stores in
fiscal year 2011. Historically, these conversions result in
increased store profitability and generate return on investment
in excess of 30% over a twelve-month period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drive Comparable Store Sales. We seek to
maximize our comparable store sales by increasing the
penetration of our diversified product categories, increasing
our rue21 brand awareness, continuing to provide our distinctive
store experience and converting existing stores to our larger
rue21 etc! layout. We believe that our fashionable merchandise
selections and affordable prices create more shopping excitement
for our customers, increase our brand loyalty and drive sales.
We believe significant opportunities exist to grow our higher
margin accessories and footwear categories, both of which have
been recent drivers of comparable store sales growth. We also
believe that our ability to quickly and consistently introduce
the newest fashions into our stores keeps our shopping
experience fresh and exciting and drives repeat customer visits.
|
|
|
|
Improve Profit Margins. We believe we have the
opportunity to drive margin expansion through scale
efficiencies, implementation of advanced planning and allocation
systems and business processes, continued cost discipline and
changes in merchandise mix. We believe our strong expected store
growth will permit us to take advantage of economies of scale in
sourcing and to leverage our existing infrastructure, corporate
overhead and fixed costs. We are focused on increasing
efficiencies in our supply chain and distribution systems to
achieve better product flow and a leaner inventory position. We
believe the expansion of our higher margin categories, such as
accessories and footwear, will increase our overall margins over
time.
|
Our
Stores
As of January 29, 2011, we operated 638 stores in
44 states throughout the United States. Our stores are
located in strip centers, regional malls and outlet centers.
We have an ongoing strategy to convert our existing store base
into the larger rue21 etc! layout. As a result, we have worked
with our landlords to either convert or relocate our existing
stores to attractively priced new locations, either in the same
shopping center or in shopping centers in close proximity to the
existing store, that would allow us to prominently showcase all
of our product lines in a compelling store layout. In fiscal
year 2010, we converted 31 stores to our rue21 etc! layout,
which features expanded accessories categories.
6
Store
Locations
The following store list shows the number of stores operated in
each state as of January 29, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
State
|
|
of Stores
|
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
28
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
16
|
|
Arkansas
|
|
|
10
|
|
California
|
|
|
23
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
7
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
1
|
|
Delaware
|
|
|
1
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
26
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
45
|
|
Idaho
|
|
|
2
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
18
|
|
Indiana
|
|
|
16
|
|
Iowa
|
|
|
8
|
|
Kansas
|
|
|
6
|
|
Kentucky
|
|
|
13
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
23
|
|
Maine
|
|
|
1
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
6
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
7
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
17
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
5
|
|
Mississippi
|
|
|
21
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
16
|
|
Nebraska
|
|
|
3
|
|
Nevada
|
|
|
5
|
|
New Hampshire
|
|
|
2
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
5
|
|
New Mexico
|
|
|
8
|
|
New York
|
|
|
14
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
40
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
20
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
17
|
|
Oregon
|
|
|
7
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
27
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
18
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
27
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
73
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
13
|
|
Vermont
|
|
|
2
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
16
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
8
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
State
|
|
of Stores
|
|
|
West Virginia
|
|
|
8
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
|
8
|
|
Wyoming
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
638
|
|
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
certain geographic information, which is incorporated herein by
reference.
Distinctive
Store Experience
Our stores are designed by our in-house team in partnership with
architectural consultants with the goal of creating an exciting
and inviting atmosphere for girls and guys to shop and
socialize. Our stores feature colorful displays showcasing the
latest styles and trends, themed dressing rooms and top-40
music. Girls and guys apparel is located in separate areas with
trend walls displaying the newest fashions. We believe that the
fun and playful atmosphere in our stores contributes to the
overall shopping experience.
Each of our stores is typically led by a manager, a full-time
assistant manager, two part-time assistant managers and eight to
ten part-time sales associates, depending on store volume.
Store
Growth and Store Conversions
Our in-house real estate team works along with our brokerage
network to negotiate the leases, lease renewals, and
construction costs of every site. We lease all of our stores and
determine store locations based on several factors, including
geographic location, demographic information and proximity to
other value retailers including Walmart, Target and Kohls.
Additionally, we analyze factors such as performance of a
particular shopping center, the quality and nature of existing
shopping center tenants and the configuration of the space and
the lease terms being offered.
In fiscal year 2010, we opened 105 new stores. We plan to open a
total of 110 stores in fiscal year 2011. We expect our store
base to grow from 638 stores today to more than 1,000 stores.
Our new store strategy is primarily focused on expanding our
strip center presence. We also see an opportunity to increase
our footprint within regional malls and to a more limited extent
in outlet centers.
Converting existing stores to our larger rue21 etc! layout
remains central to our growth strategy. As of January 29,
2011, 449 of our 638 stores were in the rue21 etc! layout. We
have plans to continue to convert additional stores within the
next five years to the larger rue 21 etc! layout as
opportunities to do so become available. In fiscal year 2011, we
have plans to convert 35 stores to the rue21 etc! layout. The
table below highlights certain information regarding our new
stores opened and existing stores converted to the rue21 etc!
layout as of the fiscal year end for each of the years indicated
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Stores at beginning of period
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
Stores opened during period(1)
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Stores closed during period
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stores at end of period
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Store conversions during the period
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stores opened during period do not include existing stores that
have been converted. |
8
rueCulture
and rueCommunity
A key component to our ongoing success has been our ability to
preserve and continue to build our deep rooted corporate and
customer culture. The passion and commitment fostered by
rueCulture enables us to connect with our employees and
customers, to differentiate our customers shopping
experience and to ultimately drive our growth and profitability.
Customer
Connection
We create a fun and exciting fashion destination for our
customers both in the store, through our themed dressing rooms
and our top-40 music selection, and on the internet via our
website, the rueCommunity blog and other social networking sites
such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. We consult a panel of
teen advisors who regularly provide us with feedback on products
and trends. By carrying the newest styles and regularly updating
floor sets, we encourage our customers to shop our stores
frequently. Our store associates share the rue21 excitement and
deliver a memorable, high energy in-store experience to our
customers. Our stores have become a community destination of
choice where customers can meet and socialize with friends.
Associate
Development
rueCulture emphasizes exceptional people, and we believe that
the passion and commitment of our managers, assistant managers
and sales associates are key to our past and future success. We
are intensely focused on fostering the talents of our employees,
and are committed to providing sales associates and managers
with career advancement opportunities. We endeavor to promote a
large portion of store managers and district managers from
within our company. We emphasize clear communication throughout
the company, and routinely hold store manager conference calls
and store level, district, and regional management meetings to
keep our employees focused, informed and involved. In addition,
we provide continuing education and training through our
Management Advancement Development training program and our
rueniversity assistant manager training program,
which promote building effective management skills and reinforce
the rueCulture.
Our
Products and Brands
We offer a complete assortment of fashion apparel and
accessories for girls and guys, including graphic t-shirts,
denim, dresses, shirts, hoodies, belts, jewelry, handbags,
footwear, intimate apparel and other accessories. We seek to
identify the most current fashion trends in the market and
utilize our product and sourcing teams to quickly introduce
these fashions to our stores. All our brands are sold
exclusively through our own stores. Our apparel and accessory
brands include rue21 (Girls apparel), rue21 etc! (Girls
accessories), tarea by rue21 (Girls intimate apparel), Carbon
and CJ Black (Guys apparel), rue Kicks (Girls and Guys
footwear), and Carbon Elements (Guys accessories). In addition,
we sell our own line of fragrances under names of rue by rue21,
revert eco rue21, CJ Black, sparkle rue21, Pink Ice by rue21,
MetroBlack rue21, tarea by rue21, and twentyone black rue21. Our
strategy is to price our fashion merchandise lower than most
other similar apparel retailers, with most of our products
priced below $35.00. The prices for each of our products
typically range from $7.99 to $39.99 for our girls and guys
apparel, $1.99 to $29.99 for our accessories, $12.99 to $39.99
for our footwear and $9.99 for our fragrances.
The table below indicates our product mix as a percentage of our
net sales derived from our product categories, based on our
internal merchandising system, as of the fiscal year end for
each of the years indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Girls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apparel
|
|
|
55.9
|
%
|
|
|
56.7
|
%
|
|
|
58.3
|
%
|
Accessories
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
Guys Apparel and Accessories
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
We believe that we have an opportunity to increase sales in our
accessories and intimate apparel categories. Our product mix may
change based on the growth rate of each product category,
although an increase in net sales in one of our product
categories may not necessarily decrease net sales in our other
product categories. Our diversified product assortment allows us
to benefit from increased sales in all categories.
Merchandising
and Sourcing
Our flexible, fast fashion model allows us to quickly identify
and respond to trends and bring the newest, tested concepts and
styles to our stores. We strive to offer a compelling product
selection for our customers by regularly editing our merchandise
assortment to reflect key fashion trends and by shipping daily
deliveries of new merchandise to our stores.
Merchandising
We maintain a separate merchandising team for each of the three
principal categories of our business girls apparel,
girls accessories and guys apparel and accessories. Our
merchandise directors, with the support of our product
development and visual teams, coordinate color and trends across
the product categories to ensure brand consistency. We utilize
fashion and color services, trade shows, vendors, retail
shopping and social networking to identify the merchandise that
meets the demands of our customers. Our merchandising team
schedules weekly trend meetings to review the information
gathered and determine the trends to incorporate into our
product offerings. We order our product assortments after
careful review and consideration of the volumes required by each
of our stores. We frequently test our new products in a limited
number of our stores before broadly distributing to the rest of
our stores.
Sourcing
We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities. We
purchase all of our merchandise from a network of third-party
vendors. We believe our lack of dependence on any one vendor
enhances our flexibility and minimizes product risk. In
addition, we believe our long-term relationships with many of
our vendors enable us to benefit from quick deliveries as well
as very competitive pricing.
Although all of our vendors are based in the United States, the
majority source our products from overseas. Our vendors are
responsible for importing products. We do not directly import
any of our merchandise. A small portion of our merchandise is
manufactured domestically. This maximizes our speed to market on
key fashion items.
Our vendors are required to sign our vendor agreement that
incorporates a comprehensive vendor compliance manual, which is
updated regularly. The vendor compliance manual details our
packing, shipping and production requirements, as well as our
legal requirements, professional and ethical standards and
payment terms. We typically transact business on an
order-by-order
basis. Each purchase order also incorporates and references the
requirements, standards and terms described in the preceding
sentence. The purchase orders, vendor agreement and vendor
compliance manual all are designed to ensure that our vendors
operate in compliance with all applicable rules and regulations,
including labor, customs and consumer protection laws. We do not
control or audit the vendors that produce the merchandise we
sell. We do reserve the right to conduct random testing of
products and use a third party resource to conduct such random
testing on designated categories of items to further address our
concern for customer safety.
Our national freight consolidator ships to our distribution
facility in Weirton, West Virginia from both the west coast and
east coast.
Marketing
and Advertising
We believe that girls and guys rely heavily on the opinions of
their peers, often expressed through social media, websites and
blogs, to determine whether a retailer is relevant to them. As a
result, we do not depend on
10
conventional advertising, but instead employ a viral approach to
marketing that is designed to capture the interest of our
customers and drive them into our stores. For example, product
knowledge, trend statements and fashion blogs are posted daily
through Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Our rue21.com website
reinforces our brand image and allows us to reach our customers
in a fun and interactive environment. Website promotions and
contests are an added incentive to motivate teens to share their
voice. In addition, email campaigning is used to send
e-blasts
on a regular basis to customers who have provided their email
addresses to us though our website or in-store collection
processes. The
e-blasts
highlight key trends, new products and promotional events to
drive our customer back to our stores.
In addition to using our website and social networking to
promote our brand image, we employ a community-based marketing
approach to building brand awareness and customer loyalty. We
often initiate marketing efforts in concert with the local
shopping center management in advance of opening our stores. At
a store level, we reinforce our brands through in-store signage,
events, and product labeling.
Our coupon programs encourage repeat business from our
customers. We have built an extensive coupon program, which is
strategically planned during select time periods of the year to
maximize sales, traffic and customer loyalty. During an event,
coupons are distributed in stores to our customers to generate
repeat traffic and to provide us with information as to customer
spending, shopping patterns and habits. Hiring the right people
is a brand building tool in and of itself. We seek to hire a
diverse, energetic, enthusiastic, trendy, passionate and
knowledgeable group of individuals to be a part of our team. We
promote individuality by welcoming diversity, keeping an open
mind, and valuing different points of view.
Distribution
We distribute all of our merchandise from an 189,600 square
foot distribution and office facility located in Weirton, West
Virginia. Substantially all merchandise arrives at our
distribution facility pre-ticketed by our vendors, which allows
for a quick turn around time and reduced internal labor. In
general, the merchandise is received, sorted by stock keeping
unit, or SKU, based upon class, vendor and style, and packed in
to shipments for each store based on a predetermined allocation
plan. The distribution facility then uses an automated sorting
system for separating shipments by store. Merchandise is shipped
to our stores daily via a third-party delivery service to ensure
a steady flow of new products to our stores. We enhanced our
packing operations in 2009 and have the packing capacity to
support 1,300 stores. We continue to pursue several supply chain
initiatives that will allow us to support our growing store base
without sacrificing efficiencies, including a planned expansion
of the current distribution facility footprint to
360,000 square feet.
Management
Information Systems
Our management information systems provide a full range of
business process support and information to our store,
merchandising, financial and real estate business teams. We
believe the combination of our business processes and systems
provide us with improved operational efficiencies, scalability,
increased management control and timely reporting that allow us
to identify and respond to trends in our business. See
Risk Factors We rely significantly on
information systems and any failure, inadequacy, interruption or
security failure of those systems could harm our ability to
effectively operate our business.
Competition
We believe rue21 is specialized in its ability to operate
successfully in many different types of markets, including small
or middle markets where there is limited direct competition.
11
Although large value retailers, including Walmart, Target and
Kohls, sell merchandise at comparable price points, our
store format and in-store shopping experience is distinctive,
with an exciting and inviting atmosphere offering trend-right
fashions and our exclusive brands. Large value retailers may
only have a small part of their store and total product
selection dedicated to apparel and accessories. Department
stores, including Dillards and JC Penney, or other junior
retailers may be located in regional malls or outlet centers in
small to middle markets; however we believe that we have been
successful competing in these markets against all types of
competition based on our product assortment, exclusive brands,
ability to respond to changing trends, and our distinctive
combination of fashion and value. Although we feel we have many
competitive strengths, we recognize that we face some
competitive challenges in small to middle markets, including the
fact that large value retailers, department stores and some
junior retail stores have substantially greater name
recognition, as well as financial, marketing, and other
resources, and devote greater resources to the marketing and
sale of their products than we do. We believe that we benefit
from the traffic that large value retailers generate in a
shopping center, and often seek to place ourselves in close
proximity to large value retailers.
The junior and young mens specialty apparel landscape is
highly competitive in large markets, which we define as
communities with populations in excess of 200,000 people.
We believe we are able to operate successfully in these markets
given our distinctive combination of fashion and value. In large
markets, we tend to position ourselves adjacent to other value
retailers in strip centers or outlet centers, providing the
possibility of significant customer traffic and increased
potential for sales.
Intellectual
Property
We have registered numerous trademarks, trade names and logos
with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including
rue21 and rue21 etc!, Carbon, Carbon Black, the CJ logo design,
rue Kicks and tarea by rue21. We also own trademark
registrations for the names of our fragrances, including rue by
rue21, revert eco rue21, CJ Black rue21, sparkle rue21, Metro
Black rue21, Pink Ice by rue21, Carbon elements and twentyone
black. These trademarks are renewable indefinitely, as long as
they are still in use and their registrations are properly
maintained. We believe that the recognition associated with
these trademarks makes them extremely valuable and, therefore,
we intend to use and renew our trademarks in accordance with our
business plans. In addition we own domain names, including
www.rue21.com, for our primary trademarks and own unregistered
copyright rights in our website content. We also rely on a
variety of intellectual property rights that we license from
third parties. We expect to continually grow our merchandise
assortment and strengthen our brands, and we will continue to
file new applications as appropriate to protect our intellectual
property rights.
Regulation
and Legislation
We are subject to labor and employment laws, laws governing
advertising and promotions, privacy laws, safety regulations and
other laws, including consumer protection regulations that
regulate retailers
and/or
govern the promotion and sale of merchandise and the operation
of stores and warehouse facilities. We monitor changes in these
laws and believe that we are in material compliance with
applicable laws.
Insurance
We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance to protect
ourselves against risks inherent in our business, including
workers compensation, general liability, automobile
liability, and employee-related health care benefits, a portion
of which is paid by the employees. We believe that we have
adequately reserved for our self-
12
insurance liability. We evaluate our insurance requirements on
an ongoing basis to ensure we maintain adequate levels of
coverage.
Employees
As of January 29, 2011, we had 7,243 employees of
which 5,295 were part-time employees. Of this total number,
228 employees were based at our corporate headquarters,
144 employees were employed at our distribution facility,
90 regional and district managers were employed in the field,
2,424 managers and assistant managers and 4,357 sales associates
were located in our stores. None of our employees is represented
by a union and we have had no labor-related work stoppages. Our
rueCulture emphasizes teamwork and the belief that everyone can
make a difference. The value we place on our employees is one of
the keys to our success, and as a result we believe our
relationship with our employees is strong.
Seasonality
Our business is seasonal and, historically, we have realized a
higher portion of our net sales, net income and operating cash
flows during the
back-to-school
and holiday selling seasons. As a result, our working capital
requirements fluctuate during the year, increasing in mid-summer
in anticipation of the
back-to-school
selling season. Our business is also subject, at certain times,
to calendar shifts, which may occur during key selling times
such as school holidays, Easter and regional fluctuations in the
calendar during the
back-to-school
selling season.
Available
Information
Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and all amendments to those reports and the proxy statement for
our annual meeting of stockholders are made available, free of
charge, on our corporate web site, www.rue21.com, as soon as
reasonably practicable after such reports have been filed with
or furnished to the SEC.
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the Code)
and Board of Directors Committee Charters (for each of our
Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committees) are also available on our website. The Committee
Charters and the Code can be found at www.rue21.com, under the
Investor Relations, Corporate Governance tab. Any
amendments and waivers to the Code will also be available on our
website.
All of these documents are available in print to any stockholder
who requests them via our website or by writing to rue21, inc.,
c/o Vice
President and General Counsel, 800 Commonwealth Dr.,
Suite 100, Warrendale, PA 15086.
The public may also read and copy any materials that we have
filed with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. In
addition, these materials may be obtained at the web site
maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. The public may obtain
information on the operation of the SECs Public Reference
room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The content of our web site (www.rue21.com) is not intended to
be incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our
business is highly dependent upon our ability to identify and
respond to new and changing fashion trends, customer preferences
and other related factors.
Fashion trends and customer tastes are volatile and can change
rapidly. Our success depends in large part upon our ability to
effectively identify and respond to changing fashion trends and
consumer demands, and to translate market trends into
appropriate, saleable product offerings in a timely manner. A
small number of our employees, including our divisional
merchandise managers, our Senior Vice President and General
Merchandise Manager and our President and Chief Executive
Officer, are primarily responsible for performing this analysis
and making related product purchase decisions. Failure of these
employees to identify and react appropriately to new and
changing trends or tastes or to accurately forecast demand for
certain product offerings could lead to, among other things,
13
excess inventories, markdowns and write-offs, which could
materially adversely affect us and our brand image. Because our
success depends significantly on our brand image, damage to our
brand in particular would have a negative impact on us. There
can be no assurance that our new product offerings will be met
with the same level of acceptance as our past product offerings
or that we will be able to adequately and timely respond to the
preferences of our customers. The failure of any new product
offerings could have a material adverse effect on our business
plan, results of operations and financial condition.
Our
growth strategy depends upon our ability to successfully open
and operate a significant number of new stores each year in a
timely and cost-effective manner without affecting the success
of our existing store base.
Our net sales have grown appreciably during the past several
years, primarily as a result of the opening of new stores. We
intend to continue to pursue our growth strategy of opening new
stores for the foreseeable future, and our future operating
results will depend largely upon our ability to successfully
open and operate a significant number of new stores each year in
a timely and cost-effective manner, and to profitably manage a
significantly larger business. We believe there is a significant
opportunity to expand our store base from 638 locations as of
January 29, 2011 to more than 1,000 stores. In fiscal year
2011, we plan to open 110 new stores, and convert 35 stores.
Our ability to successfully open and operate new stores depends
on many factors including, among others, our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
identify suitable store locations primarily in strip centers and
regional malls, the availability of which is largely outside of
our control;
|
|
|
|
negotiate acceptable lease terms, desired tenant allowances and
assurances from operators and developers that they can complete
the project, which depend in part on the financial resources of
the operators and developers;
|
|
|
|
obtain or maintain adequate capital resources on acceptable
terms;
|
|
|
|
source sufficient levels of inventory at acceptable costs;
|
|
|
|
hire, train and retain an expanded workforce of store managers
and other personnel;
|
|
|
|
successfully integrate new stores into our existing control
structure and operations, including information system
integration;
|
|
|
|
maintain adequate distribution facility, information system and
other operational system capabilities;
|
|
|
|
identify and satisfy the merchandise and other preferences of
our customers in new geographic areas and markets; and
|
|
|
|
address competitive, merchandising, marketing, distribution and
other challenges encountered in connection with expansion into
new geographic areas and markets.
|
In addition, as the number of our stores increases, we may face
risks associated with market saturation of our product
offerings. To the extent our new store openings are in markets
where we have existing stores, we may experience reduced net
sales in existing stores in those markets. Finally, there can be
no assurance that any newly opened stores will be received as
well as, or achieve net sales or profitability levels comparable
to those of, our existing stores in the time periods estimated
by us, or at all. If our stores fail to achieve, or are unable
to sustain, acceptable net sales and profitability levels, our
business may be materially harmed and we may incur significant
costs associated with closing those stores.
Our failure to effectively address challenges such as these
could adversely affect our ability to successfully open and
operate new stores in a timely and cost-effective manner, and
could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition. In addition, our current
expansion plans are only estimates. The actual number of new
stores we open each year and actual number of suitable locations
for our new stores could differ significantly from these
estimates. Any failure to successfully open and operate new
stores in the time frames
14
and at the costs estimated by us could have a material adverse
effect on our business and result in a decline in the price of
our common stock.
Our
growth strategy will require us to expand and improve our
operations and could strain our existing resources and cause the
performance of our existing stores to suffer.
Our operating complexity will increase as our store base grows.
Such increased complexity will require that we continue to
expand and improve our operating capabilities, and grow, train
and manage our employee base. We will need to continually
evaluate the adequacy of our information and distribution
systems and controls and procedures related to financial
reporting. Implementing new systems, controls and procedures and
any changes to existing systems, controls and procedures could
present challenges we do not anticipate and could negatively
impact us.
In addition, we may be unable to hire, train and retain a
sufficient number of personnel or successfully manage our
growth; moreover, our planned expansion will place increased
demands on our existing operational, managerial, administrative
and other resources. These increased demands could cause us to
operate our business less effectively, which in turn could cause
deterioration in the financial performance of our individual
stores or our overall business.
Our rapid growth also makes it difficult for us to adequately
predict the expenditures we will need to make in the future.
This growth may also place increased burdens on our vendors, as
we will likely increase the size of our merchandise orders in
connection with such growth. In addition, increased orders may
negatively impact our approach of generally striving to minimize
the time from purchase order to product delivery, and may
increase our markdown risk. If we do not make the necessary
capital or other expenditures necessary to accommodate our
future growth, we may not be successful in our growth strategy.
We may be unable to anticipate all of the demands that our
expanding operations will impose on our business, personnel,
systems and controls and procedures, and our failure to
appropriately address such demands could have a material adverse
effect on us.
Our
business depends in part on a strong brand image, and if we are
not able to maintain and enhance our brand, particularly in new
markets where we have limited brand recognition, we may be
unable to attract a sufficient number of customers to our stores
or sell sufficient quantities of our products.
We believe that the brand image we have developed has
contributed significantly to the success of our business. We
also believe that maintaining and enhancing our brand image,
particularly in new markets where we have limited brand
recognition, is important to maintaining and expanding our
customer base. Maintaining and enhancing our brand image may
require us to make substantial investments in areas such as
merchandising, marketing, store operations, community relations,
store promotions and employee training, and these investments
may not be successful. Moreover, we do not utilize some of the
advertising and marketing media used by some of our competitors,
including advertising through the use of newspapers, magazines,
billboards, television and radio. We believe our customers are
influenced by
word-of-mouth
and social media marketing when deciding where to shop. As a
result, we employ a viral approach to marketing that is designed
to capture the interest of our customers and drive them into our
stores. For example, we offer promotions and contests through
our website, we provide product knowledge, trend statements and
fashion blogs through Facebook, Twitter and YouTube and we send
regular
e-blasts
to customers to highlight key trends, new products and
promotional events.
Because we do not rely on traditional advertising channels, such
as newspaper or television advertisements, if our viral
marketing efforts are not successful, there may be no
immediately available alternative marketing channel for us to
build awareness of our products in a manner that we think will
be successful. This may impair our ability to successfully
integrate new stores into the surrounding communities, to expand
into new markets or to maintain the strength or distinctiveness
of our brand image in our existing markets. In addition, if our
viral marketing efforts are unsuccessful or we are otherwise
required to use traditional advertising channels in our overall
marketing strategy, then we will incur additional expenses
associated with the transition to and operation of traditional
advertising channels. Failure to successfully market our
products and brand in new and existing markets could harm our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
As of January 29, 2011, our 638 stores are located in
609 cities in 44 states. A primary component of our
strategy involves expanding into new geographic markets. As we
expand into new geographic markets, we may be unable to develop,
and consumers in these markets may not accept, our brand without
significant additional
15
expenditures or at all. Maintaining and enhancing our brand
image will depend largely on our ability to offer a
differentiated in-store experience to our customers and to
continue to provide high quality products, which we may not
continue to do successfully. In addition, our brand image may
also be adversely affected if our public image or reputation is
tarnished by negative publicity. The strength of our brand image
is also dependent on our ability to successfully market our
brand and product offerings to our customer demographic. To the
extent the store and merchandise preferences of these customers
change, the popularity of our brand may decline and our business
may suffer.
Our
inability to maintain or improve levels of comparable store
sales could cause our stock price to decline.
We may not be able to maintain or improve the levels of
comparable store sales that we have experienced in the recent
past. Although we have sustained net sales growth since fiscal
year 2005, our
quarter-to-quarter
comparable store sales have ranged from a decrease of 8.1% to an
increase of 14.2%. In the past, we have experienced strong
comparable store sales, which we may not be able to sustain. If
our future comparable store sales decline or fail to meet market
expectations, the price of our common stock could decline. In
addition, the aggregate results of operations of our stores have
fluctuated in the past and will fluctuate in the future. A
variety of factors affect comparable store sales, including
fashion trends, competition, current national and regional
economic conditions, pricing, inflation, the timing of the
release of new merchandise and promotional events, changes in
our merchandise mix, inventory shrinkage, the success of our
multi-channel marketing programs, the timing and level of
markdowns and weather conditions. In addition, many retailers
have been unable to sustain high levels of comparable store
sales growth during and after periods of substantial expansion.
These factors may cause our comparable store sales results to be
materially lower than in recent periods and our expectations,
which could harm our business and result in a decline in the
price of our common stock.
Our
current merchandise planning and allocation strategies may not
improve sales and merchandise margins.
We currently have several planning and allocation strategies
planned to improve sales and merchandise margins. There is no
guarantee that the shift to new business processes will result
in higher sales in our stores or improved margins for our
business as a whole. Moreover, implementation of these
strategies could increase costs and place a strain on our
management, operational resources, and information systems. The
failure of our planning and allocation strategies to improve
sales and merchandise margins could have a material adverse
impact on our business or our stock price.
Our
business is sensitive to global, national and regional consumer
spending and economic conditions.
Consumer purchases of discretionary retail items and specialty
retail products, including our products, may be affected by
economic conditions such as employment levels, salary and wage
levels, the availability of consumer credit, inflation, high
interest rates, high tax rates, high fuel prices and consumer
confidence in future economic conditions. A general decline in
consumer sentiment may occur due to national and regional
economic conditions, resulting in a general decrease in
discretionary purchases. Our financial performance is
particularly susceptible to economic and other conditions in
regions or states where we have a significant number of stores,
such as Texas, North Carolina or Georgia. Current economic
conditions and a future slowdown in the economy could further
adversely affect strip center and regional mall traffic and new
strip center and regional mall development and could materially
adversely affect us and our growth plans.
Our
plans to convert our existing stores and expand our product
offerings may not be successful, and implementation of these
plans may divert our operational, managerial and administrative
resources, which could impact our competitive
position.
In addition to our store growth strategy, we plan to convert
many of our existing stores and grow our business by expanding
some of our existing product categories, including our rue21
etc! girls jewelry and accessories
16
category, our footwear category and our Carbon guys apparel and
accessories category. These plans involve various risks
discussed elsewhere in these risk factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
implementation of these plans may be delayed or may not be
successful;
|
|
|
|
we may be unable to identify locations for conversion of
existing stores to our larger rue21 etc! layout;
|
|
|
|
if our expanded product offerings fail to maintain and enhance
our distinctive brand identity, our brand image may be
diminished and our sales may decrease;
|
|
|
|
if we fail to expand our infrastructure, including by securing
desirable store locations at reasonable costs and hiring and
training employees, we may be unable to manage our expansion
successfully; and
|
|
|
|
implementation of these plans may divert managements
attention from other aspects of our business and place a strain
on our management, operational and financial resources, as well
as our information systems.
|
In addition, our ability to successfully carry out our plans to
expand our product offerings may be affected by, among other
things, inventory shrinkage that can result from an inventory
that consists of smaller and easily concealable items such as
jewelry, economic and competitive conditions, changes in
consumer spending patterns and changes in consumer preferences
and style trends. Our expansion plans could be delayed or
abandoned, could cost more than anticipated or could divert
resources from other areas of our business, any one of which
could negatively impact our competitive position and reduce our
revenue and profitability.
We
could face increased competition from other retailers that could
adversely affect us and our growth strategy.
We face competition in the specialty retail industry. We compete
on the basis of a combination of factors, including among other
things, price, breadth, quality and style of merchandise
offered, in-store experience, level of customer service, ability
to identify and respond to new and emerging fashion trends,
brand image and scalability. We compete with a wide variety of
large and small retailers for customers, vendors, suitable store
locations and personnel. We face competition from major
specialty apparel retailers that offer their own private label
assortment, including Aéropostale, American Eagle
Outfitters, Charlotte Russe, Forever 21, the Gap, J. Crew,
Metropark, Old Navy and Wet Seal, as well as national off-price
apparel chains such as TJX Companies, Burlington Coat Factory,
and Ross Stores. We also face competition from department stores
such as Dillards, and JC Penney, and large value retailers
such as Walmart, Target and Kohls. We also compete against
local off-price and specialty retail stores, regional retail
chains, web-based retail stores and other direct retailers that
engage in the retail sale of junior and young mens
apparel, accessories, footwear and similar merchandise, which
offer a variety of products, including apparel, for the
value-conscious consumer. The competitive landscape we face,
particularly among specialty retailers, is subject to rapid
change which can affect customer preferences.
Many of our competitors have substantially greater name
recognition as well as financial, marketing and other resources
and therefore may be able to adapt to changes in customer
preferences more quickly, devote greater resources to marketing
and sale of their products, generate national brand recognition
or adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we can. Many of
our competitors also utilize advertising and marketing media
which we do not, including advertising through use of
newspapers, magazines, billboards, television and radio, which
may provide them with greater brand recognition than we have.
Our competitors may also sell certain products or substantially
similar products through the Internet or through outlet centers
or discount stores, increasing the competitive pricing pressure
for those products. We cannot assure you that we will continue
to be able to compete successfully against existing or future
competitors. Our expansion into markets served by our
competitors and entry of new competitors or expansion of
existing competitors into our markets could have a material
adverse effect on us. Competitive forces and pressures may
intensify as our presence in the retail marketplace grows.
We do not possess exclusive rights to many of the elements that
comprise our in-store experience and product offerings. Some
specialty retailers offer a personalized shopping experience
that in some ways is similar to the one we strive to provide to
our customers. Our competitors may seek to emulate facets of our
business strategy and in-store experience, which could result in
a reduction of any competitive advantage or special appeal that
we might
17
possess. In addition, some of our product offerings are sold to
us on a nonexclusive basis. As a result, our current and future
competitors may be able to duplicate or improve upon some or all
of our in-store experience or product offerings that we believe
are important in differentiating our stores and our
customers shopping experience, especially those
competitors with significantly greater financial, marketing and
other resources than ours. If our competitors were to duplicate
or improve upon some or all of our in-store experience or
product offerings, our competitive position and our business
could suffer.
We
depend on key personnel and may not be able to retain or replace
these individuals or recruit additional personnel, which could
harm our business.
We believe that we have benefited substantially from the
leadership and experience of our key personnel, including our
President and Chief Executive Officer, Robert N. Fisch, and our
Senior Vice President and General Merchandise Manager, Kim A.
Reynolds. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel
could have a material adverse effect on our business and
prospects, as we may not be able to find suitable individuals to
replace such personnel on a timely basis. In addition, any such
departure could be viewed in a negative light by investors and
analysts, which could cause our common stock price to decline.
Only our President and Chief Executive Officer is subject to
non-compete obligations at the present time. In addition, except
for our President and Chief Executive Officer and employees
subject to stock option award agreements, our employees are not
subject to non-solicitation obligations. Moreover, we do not
have employment agreements with any of our employees and we do
not maintain key man or key woman
insurance policies on the lives of these individuals, except for
our President and Chief Executive Officer. As a result, their
employment may be terminated by us or them at any time. We may
consider entering into employment agreements or other long-term
incentive programs with certain members of senior management. As
our business expands, our future success will depend greatly on
our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled and
qualified personnel. We are also currently in search of
qualified and experienced individuals to fill open senior
management positions. There is a high level of competition for
experienced, successful personnel in the retail industry. Our
inability to meet our staffing requirements in the future could
impair our growth and harm our business.
Our
ability to attract customers to our stores that are located in
strip centers, regional malls and outlet centers depends heavily
on the success of the shopping centers in which our stores are
located, and any decrease in customer traffic in these shopping
centers could cause our net sales to be less than
expected.
Our stores are located in strip centers, regional malls and
outlet centers and our expansion is expected to be predominantly
focused on strip centers and regional malls. Net sales at these
stores are derived, to a significant degree, from the volume of
traffic in those shopping centers and the surrounding area. Our
stores benefit from the ability of shopping centers other
tenants, particularly anchor stores such as Walmart, Target and
Kohls, to generate consumer traffic in the vicinity of our
stores and the continuing popularity of the strip centers,
regional malls and outlet centers as shopping destinations. Our
sales volume and traffic may be adversely affected by, among
other things, economic downturns nationally or regionally, high
fuel prices, increased competition, changes in consumer
demographics, a decrease in popularity of shopping centers or of
stores in the shopping centers in which our stores are located,
the closing of anchor stores important to our business, or a
deterioration in the financial condition of shopping center
operators or developers which could, for example, limit their
ability to finance tenant improvements for us and other
retailers. A reduction in consumer traffic as a result of these
or any other factors, or our inability to obtain or maintain
prominent store locations within shopping centers, could have a
material adverse effect on us.
We
plan to use cash from operations to fund our expanding business
and execute on our growth strategy and may require additional
financing, which may not be available to us.
We have grown rapidly, with our net sales increasing from
$225.6 million for fiscal year 2006 to $634.7 million
for fiscal year 2010. During fiscal year 2010, capital
expenditures, net of tenant allowances, were $25.5 million,
of which $11.9 million was related to the 105 new stores we
opened during fiscal year 2010. In addition, we spent
approximately $7.5 million to convert our existing stores
during fiscal year 2010. We plan to continue our growth and
expansion, including opening a significant number of additional
stores, as well as converting existing stores.
18
Our plans to expand our store base may not be successful and the
implementation of these plans may not result in expected
increases in our net sales even though they increase our costs.
To support our expanding business and execute our growth
strategy, we will need significant amounts of cash from
operations, including funds to pay our lease obligations, build
out new store space, purchase inventory, pay personnel, further
invest in our infrastructure and facilities, and pay for the
increased costs associated with operating as a public company.
In particular, payments under the operating leases associated
with our stores and our distribution facility account for a
significant portion of our operating expenses.
We primarily depend on cash flow from operations and our senior
secured credit facility to fund our business and growth plans.
If our business does not generate sufficient cash flow from
operations to fund these activities or we experience working
capital leverage deterioration, and sufficient funds are not
otherwise available to us under our senior secured credit
facility, we may need additional equity or debt financing. If
such financing is not available to us on satisfactory terms, our
ability to run and expand our business or to respond to
competitive pressures would be limited and we could be required
to delay, significantly curtail or eliminate planned store
openings or operations or other elements of our growth strategy.
We
have many important vendor relationships and our ability to
obtain merchandise at competitive prices could suffer as a
result of any deterioration or change in those relationships or
events that adversely affect our vendors or their ability to
obtain financing for their operations.
We have many important vendor relationships that we believe
provide us with a competitive advantage. We do not own or
operate any manufacturing facilities. We instead purchase all of
our merchandise from third-party vendors. Over the last twelve
months, we sourced a majority of our merchandise from our
various merchandise vendors, with no single vendor accounting
for more than 7% of our merchandise. Our financial performance
depends in large part on our ability to purchase desired
merchandise in sufficient quantities at competitive prices from
these and other vendors. In some cases, we obtain exclusive use
of select products from our vendors for a period of time.
Moreover, from time to time, some of our vendors allow us to
return certain merchandise purchased from them with their prior
consent. We are also typically able to return merchandise that
does not meet our preset specifications. However, we generally
have no long-term purchase contracts or other contractual
assurances of continued supply, pricing or access to new
products. Any of our vendors could discontinue supplying us with
desired products in sufficient quantities for a variety of
reasons. The benefits we currently experience from our vendor
relationships could be adversely affected if our vendors:
|
|
|
|
|
choose to discontinue selling non-exclusive or exclusive
products to us;
|
|
|
|
refuse to allow us to return merchandise purchased from them;
|
|
|
|
raise the prices they charge us;
|
|
|
|
sell similar or identical products to certain of our
competitors, many of whom purchase products in significantly
greater volume and, in some cases, at lower prices than we do;
|
|
|
|
enter into arrangements with competitors that could impair our
ability to sell their products, including by giving our
competitors exclusive licensing arrangements or exclusive access
to styles, brands and products or limiting our access to such
arrangements or styles, brands or products;
|
|
|
|
initiate or expand sales of their products through their own
stores or through the Internet to the retail market and
therefore compete with us directly; or
|
|
|
|
sell their products through outlet centers or discount stores,
increasing the competitive pricing pressure we face.
|
Continued challenging macroeconomic conditions and rising raw
material costs, such as the price of cotton, could negatively
impact our vendors, which, in turn, could have an adverse impact
on our business. Some of our vendors are small and specialized
with limited resources, production capacities and operating
histories. Rising costs of raw materials, fuel, or labor
shortages could cause our vendors to slow or cease shipments or
require or condition
19
their sale of merchandise on more stringent payment terms. If
this were to occur it could impair our ability to obtain desired
merchandise in sufficient quantities.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to acquire
desired merchandise in sufficient quantities on acceptable terms
or at all in the future, especially if we need significantly
greater amounts of inventory in connection with the growth of
our business. Any inability to acquire suitable merchandise in
sufficient quantities and at acceptable prices, in particular
exclusive merchandise, due to the loss of or deterioration or
change in our relationship with one or more key vendors, or
events harmful to our vendors, may materially adversely affect
us.
We are
subject to risks associated with leasing substantial amounts of
space, including future increases in occupancy
costs.
We do not own any real estate. Instead, we lease all of our
store locations, our corporate headquarters in Warrendale,
Pennsylvania and our distribution facility in Weirton, West
Virginia. We lease our distribution facility from the State of
West Virginia under a lease that expires in 2012, with one
five-year renewal option. We are currently negotiating with the
State of West Virginia to develop adjacent land and expand our
distribution facility in 2011, and we plan to enter into a new
lease that incorporates the expanded square footage. Although we
feel we have appropriate expansion plans, if we do not
successfully negotiate and execute a new lease, our distribution
facility may not be able to support our business demands in the
future, and we could incur higher costs and longer lead times if
we are forced to locate a new distribution facility.
We typically occupy our stores under operating leases with terms
of five to ten years, generally with additional five-year
renewal options. We have been able to negotiate favorable rental
rates over the last year due in part to the state of the economy
and high vacancy rates within some shopping centers; however,
there is no guarantee that we will be able to continue to
negotiate such favorable terms, and this could cause our
occupancy rates to be higher in future years or may force us to
close stores in desirable locations. Some of our leases have
early cancellation clauses, which permit the lease to be
terminated by us or the landlord if certain sales levels are not
met in specific periods or if the strip center does not meet
specified occupancy standards. In addition to future minimum
lease payments, most of our store leases provide for additional
rental payments based on a percentage of net sales, or
percentage rent, if sales at the respective stores
exceed specified levels, as well as the payment of common area
maintenance charges, real property insurance and real estate
taxes. Most of our lease agreements have defined escalating rent
provisions over the initial term and any extensions. As we
expand our store base, our lease expense and our cash outlays
for rent under the lease agreements will increase. Our
substantial operating lease obligations could have significant
negative consequences, including:
|
|
|
|
|
requiring that a substantial portion of our available cash be
applied to pay our rental obligations, thus reducing cash
available for other purposes;
|
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and
industry conditions;
|
|
|
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes
in our business or in the industry in which we compete; and
|
|
|
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing.
|
Any of these consequences could place us at a disadvantage with
respect to our competitors. We depend on cash flow from
operations to pay our lease expenses and to fulfill our other
cash needs. If our business does not generate sufficient cash
flow from operating activities to fund these expenses and needs,
we may not be able to service our lease expenses, grow our
business, respond to competitive challenges or fund our other
liquidity and capital needs, which would harm our business.
Additional sites that we lease may be subject to long-term
non-cancelable leases if we are unable to negotiate our current
standard lease terms. If an existing or future store is not
profitable, and we decide to close it, we may nonetheless be
committed to perform our obligations under the applicable lease
including, among other things, paying the base rent for the
balance of the lease term. Moreover, even if a lease has an
early cancellation clause, we may not satisfy the contractual
requirements for early cancellation under that lease. Our
inability to enter into new
20
leases or renew existing leases on terms acceptable to us or be
released from our obligations under leases for stores that we
close would materially adversely affect us.
Accounting regulatory authorities have indicated that they may
begin to require lessees to capitalize operating leases in their
financial statements in the next few years. If adopted, such a
change would require us to record a significant amount of lease
related assets and liabilities on our balance sheet and make
other changes to the recording and classification of lease
related expenses on our statement of operations and cash flows.
This and other future changes to accounting rules or regulations
or the questioning of current accounting practices in regard to
leases may materially impact the presentation of our results of
operations.
Our
failure to find store employees that reflect our brand image and
embody our culture, especially in light of our growth strategy,
could adversely affect our business.
Our success depends in part upon our ability to attract,
motivate and retain a sufficient number of store employees,
including store managers, who understand and appreciate our
corporate culture and customers, and are able to adequately and
effectively represent our culture and establish credibility with
our customers. The store employee turnover rate in the retail
industry is generally high. If we are unable to hire and retain
store personnel capable of consistently providing a high level
of customer service, as demonstrated by their enthusiasm for our
culture, understanding of our customers and knowledge of the
merchandise we offer, our ability to open new stores may be
impaired, the performance of our existing and new stores could
be materially adversely affected and our brand image may be
negatively impacted. We are also dependent upon temporary
personnel to adequately staff our stores and distribution
facility, with heightened dependence during busy periods such as
the Easter and spring break season,
back-to-school
season and the winter holiday season and when multiple new
stores are opening. There can be no assurance that we will
receive adequate assistance from our temporary personnel, or
that there will be sufficient sources of suitable temporary
personnel to meet our demand. Any such failure to meet our
staffing needs or any material increases in employee turnover
rates could have a material adverse effect on our business or
results of operations.
Currently, none of our employees is represented by a union.
However, our employees have the right at any time under the
National Labor Relations Act to form or affiliate with a union.
If some or all of our workforce were to become unionized and the
terms of the collective bargaining agreement were significantly
different from our current compensation arrangements, it could
increase our costs and adversely impact our profitability.
Our
net sales and inventory levels fluctuate on a seasonal basis or
due to store events or promotions, leaving our operating results
particularly susceptible to changes in seasonal shopping
patterns and related risks.
Our net sales are typically disproportionately higher in the
second through the fourth fiscal quarters due to increased net
sales during the
back-to-school
and winter holiday seasons. Net sales during these periods
cannot be used as an accurate indicator of annual results.
Likewise, as is the case with many retailers of apparel,
accessories and gifts, we typically experience lower net sales
in the first fiscal quarter relative to other quarters. Any
significant decrease in net sales during the
back-to-school
or winter holiday seasons would have a material adverse effect
on us. In addition, in order to prepare for these seasons, we
must order and keep in stock significantly more merchandise than
we carry during other parts of the year. This inventory
build-up may
require us to expend cash faster than is generated by our
operations during this period. Any unanticipated decrease in
demand for our products during these peak shopping seasons could
require us to sell excess inventory at a substantial markdown,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
profitability, ability to repay any indebtedness and our brand
image. In addition, we may experience variability in net sales
as a result of a variety of other factors, including the timing
of new store openings, store events, promotions or other
marketing activities, which may cause our results of operations
to fluctuate on a quarterly basis and relative to corresponding
periods in prior years.
21
We
only have one distribution facility and have not yet implemented
disaster recovery procedures, and if we encounter difficulties
associated with our distribution facility or if it were to shut
down for any reason, we could face shortages of inventory that
would have a material adverse affect on our business operations
and harm our reputation.
Our only distribution facility is located in Weirton, West
Virginia. Our distribution facility supports our entire
business. All of our merchandise is shipped to the distribution
facility from our vendors, and then packaged and shipped from
our distribution facility to our stores. The success of our
stores depends on their timely receipt of merchandise. The
efficient flow of our merchandise requires that we have adequate
capacity in our distribution facility to support our current
level of operations, and the anticipated increased levels that
may follow from our growth plans. If we encounter difficulties
associated with our distribution facility or if it were to shut
down for any reason, including by fire, natural disaster, or a
prolonged shutdown, we could face shortages of inventory,
resulting in
out-of-stock
conditions in our stores, and incur significantly higher costs
and longer lead times associated with distributing merchandise
to our stores. This could have a material adverse effect on our
business and harm our reputation. We are in the process of
developing disaster recovery and business continuity plans that
would allow us to be fully operational regardless of casualties
or unforeseen events that may affect our corporate headquarters
or distribution center. Without proper disaster recovery and
business continuity plans, if we encounter difficulties with our
distribution facility or other problems or disasters arise, we
cannot ensure that critical systems and operations will be
restored in a timely manner or at all and this would have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Although we recently implemented upgrades of our distribution
facilitys packing operations, we intend to expand the
footprint of our existing distribution facility in 2011 to
support our storage growth needs. We will need to continue to
evaluate the ability of a single facility to support our growing
business operations which may require us to secure additional
favorable real estate or may require us to obtain additional
financing. Appropriate locations or financing for the purchase
or lease of such additional real estate may not be available at
reasonable costs or at all. Our failure to provide adequate
order fulfillment and secure additional distribution capacity
when necessary could impede our growth plans, and the further
increase of this capacity would increase our costs.
We
rely upon independent third-party transportation providers for
substantially all of our product shipments.
We currently rely upon independent third-party transportation
providers for substantially all of our product shipments,
including shipments to all of our stores. Our utilization of
their delivery services for shipments, or those of any other
shipping companies we may elect to use, is subject to risks,
including increases in fuel prices, which would increase our
shipping costs, and employee strikes and inclement weather,
which may impact the shipping companys abilities to
provide delivery services that adequately meet our shipping
needs. If we change shipping companies, we could face logistical
difficulties that could adversely affect deliveries and we would
incur costs and expend resources in connection with such change.
Moreover, we may not be able to obtain terms as favorable as
those received from the independent third-party transportation
providers we currently use, which in turn would increase our
costs. We also face shipping and distribution risks and
uncertainties associated with the upgrade of our distribution
facility and related systems.
Our
ability to source our merchandise profitably or at all could be
hurt if new trade restrictions are imposed or existing trade
restrictions become more burdensome.
Trade restrictions, including increased tariffs, safeguards or
quotas, on apparel and accessories could increase the cost or
reduce the supply of merchandise available to us. Under the
World Trade Organization, or WTO, Agreement, effective
January 1, 2005, the United States and other WTO member
countries removed quotas on goods from WTO members, which in
certain instances affords us greater flexibility in importing
textile and apparel products from WTO countries from which we
source our merchandise. However, as the removal of quotas
resulted in an import surge from China, the United States in May
2005 imposed safeguard quotas on seven categories of goods and
apparel imported from China. Effective January 1, 2006, the
United States imposed quotas on approximately twelve categories
of goods and apparel from China, and may impose additional
quotas in the future. These and other trade restrictions could
have a significant impact on our sourcing patterns in the
future. The extent of this impact, if any, and the possible
effect on our purchasing patterns and costs, cannot be
determined at
22
this time. We cannot predict whether any of the countries in
which our merchandise is currently manufactured or may be
manufactured in the future will be subject to additional trade
restrictions imposed by the United States and foreign
governments, nor can we predict the likelihood, type or effect
of any such restrictions. Trade restrictions, including
increased tariffs or quotas, embargoes, safeguards and customs
restrictions against apparel items, as well as United States or
foreign labor strikes, work stoppages or boycotts, could
increase the cost or reduce the supply of apparel available to
us or may require us to modify our current business practices,
any of which could hurt our profitability.
We
rely significantly on information systems and any failure,
inadequacy, interruption or security failure of those systems
could harm our ability to effectively operate our
business.
We depend on information systems to manage our operations. Our
information systems consist of a full range of retail,
financial, and merchandise systems, including our Island Pacific
Inc., or Island Pacific, enterprise resource planning system and
Epicor Software Corporation, or Epicor, including its Customer
Relationship Management and store
point-of-sale,
or POS, system. See Business Management
Information Systems. We continue to make investments to
upgrade, enhance, or replace our systems in order to support our
growth and increase efficiencies and profitability. The failure
of our information systems to operate effectively, problems with
transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems or expanding
them into new stores, or a breach in security of these systems,
could adversely impact the promptness and accuracy of our
merchandise distribution, transaction processing, financial
accounting and reporting, the efficiency of our operations and
our ability to properly forecast earnings and cash requirements.
We could be required to make significant additional expenditures
to remediate any such failure, problem or breach. Such events
may have a material adverse effect on us.
System
security risk issues could disrupt our internal operations or
information technology services, and any such disruption could
harm our net sales, increase our expenses, and harm our
reputation and stock price.
We expend considerable time and technological resources to
secure our computer systems and technology. However despite our
best efforts, security breaches, such as unauthorized access or
computer viruses, may occur that could cause disruptions or
system shutdowns. We collect and store customer information for
limited marketing purposes. Currently, we may request customer
zip codes to assist in site selection or place customers on
email distribution lists at their request. Any compromise of
customer information could subject us to customer or government
litigation and harm our reputation, which could adversely affect
our business and growth. Moreover, we could incur significant
expenses or disruptions of our operations in connection with
system failures or breaches. In addition, sophisticated hardware
and operating system software and applications that we procure
from third parties, including that of Island Pacific or Epicor,
may contain defects in design or manufacture, including
bugs and other problems that could unexpectedly
interfere with the operation of the systems. The costs to us to
eliminate or alleviate security problems, viruses and bugs, or
any problems associated with the outsourced services provided by
Island Pacific or Epicor, could be significant, and such efforts
to address these problems could result in interruptions, delays
or cessation of service that may impede our sales, distribution
or other critical functions.
We may
suffer risks if our vendors fail to follow our vendor
guidelines, including the risk we could acquire merchandise
without full rights to sell it and the risks that a vendor or a
manufacturer may fail to use acceptable labor practices, comply
with other applicable laws or face interruption with its
operations.
We sometimes purchase merchandise from vendors who hold
manufacturing and distribution rights under the terms of certain
licenses or who themselves own intellectual property rights to
the merchandise. In addition, we purchase merchandise that may
be subject to design copyrights, design patents, or otherwise
may incorporate protected intellectual property. We are not
involved in the manufacture of any of the merchandise we
purchase from our vendors for sale to our customers, and we do
not independently investigate whether these vendors legally hold
intellectual property rights to merchandise that they are
manufacturing or distributing. As a result, we rely upon
vendors representations set forth in our purchase orders
and vendor agreements concerning their right to sell us the
products that we purchase from them. If a third party claims to
have licensing rights with respect to merchandise we
23
purchased from a vendor, or we acquire unlicensed merchandise,
we could be obligated to remove such merchandise from our
stores, incur costs associated with destruction of such
merchandise if the distributor or vendor is unwilling or unable
to reimburse us, and be subject to liability under various civil
and criminal causes of action, including actions to recover
unpaid royalties and other damages and injunctions. Although our
purchase orders and vendor agreement with each vendor require
the vendor to indemnify us against such claims, a vendor may not
have the financial resources to defend itself or us against such
claims, in which case, we may have to pay the costs and expenses
associated with defending such claim. Any of these results could
harm our brand image and have a material adverse effect on our
business and growth.
Many of the products sold in our stores are manufactured outside
of the United States, which may increase the risk that the
labor, manufacturing safety and other practices followed by the
manufacturers of these products may differ from those generally
accepted in the United States. Although we require each of our
vendors to sign a purchase order and vendor agreement that
requires adherence to accepted labor practices and compliance
with labor, manufacturing safety and other laws, we do not
supervise, control or audit our vendors or the manufacturers
that produce the merchandise we sell to our customers, and we
have no direct relationship and very limited contact with any of
the manufacturers. We do reserve the right to conduct random
testing of products and we use a third-party resource to conduct
such random testing on designated categories of items to further
address our concern for customer safety. However, some of our
vendors are small and may not have adequate procedures in place
to assure compliance with applicable labor, manufacturing safety
and other laws. The violation of such labor, manufacturing
safety or other laws by any of our vendors or these
manufacturers, or the divergence of the labor practices followed
by any of our vendors or these manufacturers from those
generally accepted in the United States, could interrupt, or
otherwise disrupt, the shipment of finished products to us or
damage our brand image
and/or
subject us to boycotts by our customers or activist groups.
So long as we purchase merchandise from domestic vendors who
source products overseas, any event causing a sudden disruption
of manufacturing or imports from Asia, Central America or
elsewhere, including the imposition of additional import
restrictions, could materially harm our operations. We have no
long-term merchandise supply contracts, and many of our imports
are subject to existing or potential duties, tariffs or quotas
that may limit the quantity of certain types of goods that may
be imported into the United States from countries in Asia,
Central America or elsewhere. We compete with other companies
for production facilities and import quota capacity.
Our vendors sourcing operations may also be hurt by
political and financial instability, strikes, health concerns
regarding infectious diseases in countries in which our
merchandise is produced, adverse weather conditions or natural
disasters that may occur in Asia, Central America or elsewhere
or acts of war or terrorism in the United States or
worldwide, to the extent these acts affect the production,
shipment or receipt of merchandise. Our future operations and
performance will be subject to these factors, which are beyond
our control, and these factors could materially hurt our
business, financial condition and results of operations or may
require us to modify our current business practices or incur
increased costs.
There
are claims made against us from time to time that can result in
litigation or regulatory proceedings which could distract
management from our business activities and result in
significant liability or damage to our brand
image.
As a growing company with expanding operations, we increasingly
face the risk of litigation and other claims against us.
Litigation and other claims may arise in the ordinary course of
our business and include employee claims, commercial disputes,
intellectual property issues, product-oriented allegations and
slip and fall claims. Often these cases raise complex factual
and legal issues, which are subject to risks and uncertainties
and which could require significant management time. We cannot
predict or determine the ultimate outcome of any legal or
administrative proceedings to which we are now subject or may
become subject in the future or quantify the loss, expense or
other amounts attributable to any such matter. The resolution of
any legal claims and administrative proceedings, if unfavorable,
could have a material adverse affect on our business and results
of operations.
24
We may
be subject to liability if we infringe upon the trademarks or
other intellectual property rights of third
parties.
We may be subject to liability if we infringe upon the
trademarks or other intellectual property rights of third
parties. If we were to be found liable for any such
infringement, we could be required to pay substantial damages
and could be subject to injunctions preventing further
infringement. Such infringement claims could subject us to
boycotts by our customers or otherwise harm our brand image. In
addition, any payments we are required to make and any
injunctions we are required to comply with as a result of such
infringement actions could adversely affect our financial
results.
Changes
in laws, including employment laws and laws related to our
merchandise, could make conducting our business more expensive
or otherwise change the way we do business.
We are subject to numerous regulations, including labor and
employment, customs,
truth-in-advertising,
consumer protection and zoning and occupancy laws and ordinances
that regulate retailers generally
and/or
govern the importation, promotion and sale of merchandise and
the operation of stores and warehouse facilities. If these
regulations were to change or were violated by our management,
employees, vendors, buying agents or trading companies, the
costs of certain goods could increase, or we could experience
delays in shipments of our goods, be subject to fines or
penalties, or suffer reputational harm, which could reduce
demand for our merchandise and hurt our business and results of
operations.
In addition to increased regulatory compliance requirements,
changes in laws could make ordinary conduct of our business more
expensive or require us to change the way we do business. For
example, changes in federal and state minimum wage laws could
raise the wage requirements for certain of our employees, which
would likely cause us to reexamine our entire wage structure for
stores. Other laws related to employee benefits and treatment of
employees, including laws related to limitations on employee
hours, supervisory status, leaves of absence, mandated health
benefits or overtime pay, could also negatively impact us, such
as by increasing compensation and benefits costs for overtime
and medical expenses. Moreover, changes in product safety or
other consumer protection laws could lead to increased costs to
us for certain merchandise, or additional labor costs associated
with readying merchandise for sale. For example, in August 2008,
the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, or CPSIA,
was signed into law. The CPSIA imposes new requirements for the
textile and apparel industries. These new requirements relate to
all products marketed to children 12 years of age and
under. Among other requirements, the Consumer Product Safety
Commission requires certification and testing of certain
regulated substances. We have engaged an accredited third party
testing service to ensure our vendors compliance with
consumer safety laws and to meet further product safety goals.
It is often difficult for us to plan and prepare for potential
changes to applicable laws and future actions or payments
related to such changes could be material to us.
We may
incur indebtedness in the future and that indebtedness could
adversely affect our financial health and harm our ability to
react to changes to our business. Any future indebtedness may
contain covenants that limit our business
activities.
We may incur indebtedness in the future. Any increase in the
amount of our indebtedness could require us to divert funds
identified for other purposes for debt service and impair our
liquidity position. If we cannot generate sufficient cash flow
from operations to service our debt, we may need to refinance
our debt, dispose of assets or issue equity to obtain necessary
funds. We do not know whether we will be able to take any of
such actions on a timely basis, on terms satisfactory to us or
at all.
Any indebtedness we incur may contain covenants that restrict
our ability to incur additional debt, pay dividends, make
acquisitions or investments or do certain other things that may
impact the value of our common stock.
We may
be unable to protect our trademarks or other intellectual
property rights.
We are not aware of any claims of infringement upon or
challenges to our right to use any of our brand names or
trademarks in the United States. Nevertheless, there can be no
assurance that the actions we have taken to establish and
protect our trademarks will be adequate to prevent imitation of
our products by others or to prevent others from
25
seeking to block sales of our products as a violation of the
trademarks or proprietary rights of others. Also, others may
assert rights in, or ownership of, our trademarks and other
proprietary rights or claim that we are infringing on their
proprietary rights, and we may not be able to successfully
resolve these types of conflicts to our satisfaction. In
addition, upon registration of our marks internationally, the
laws of certain foreign countries may not protect proprietary
rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.
Although we have begun to register our trademarks in some
foreign countries, international protection of our brand image
and the use of these marks could be limited. Other entities may
have rights to trademarks that contain portions of our marks or
may have registered similar or competing marks for apparel and
accessories in foreign countries in which our vendors source our
merchandise. There may also be other prior registrations in
other foreign countries of which we are not aware. Accordingly,
it may be possible for others to enjoin the manufacture, sale or
exportation of our branded goods to the United States. If we
were unable to reach a licensing arrangement with these parties,
our vendors may be unable to manufacture our products in those
countries. Our inability to register our trademarks or purchase
or license the right to use our trademarks or logos in these
jurisdictions could limit our ability to obtain supplies from
less costly markets or penetrate new markets should our business
plan change to include selling our merchandise in those
jurisdictions outside the United States.
Failure
to comply with regulatory requirements could negatively impact
our business.
As a public company, we are subject to numerous regulatory
requirements. Our policies, procedures and internal controls are
designed to comply with all applicable laws and regulations,
including those imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Payment Card Industry Data
Security Standards (PCI/DSS) and the NASDAQ stock market rules.
Failure to comply with such laws and regulations could have a
material adverse impact on our financial condition or the price
of our common stock.
Concentration
of ownership among our existing executive officers, directors
and principal stockholders may prevent new investors from
influencing significant corporate decisions.
Our executive officers, directors and our largest stockholder
own, in the aggregate, approximately 38.7% of our outstanding
common stock and will own options that will enable them to own,
in the aggregate, approximately 40.1% of our outstanding common
stock. As a result, these stockholders will be able to exercise
significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder
approval, including the election of directors and approval of
significant corporate transactions and will have significant
influence over our management and policies. Two of the seven
members of our board of directors are principals of Apax
Partners. Funds advised by Apax Partners can take actions that
have the effect of delaying a change in control of us or
discouraging others from making tender offers for our shares,
which could prevent stockholders from receiving a premium for
their shares. These actions may be taken even if other
stockholders oppose them. The concentration of voting power
among funds advised by Apax Partners may have an adverse effect
on the price of our common stock. The interests of these
stockholders may not be consistent with your interests as a
stockholder.
In addition, our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation will provide that the provisions of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the
DGCL, that relate to business combinations with interested
stockholders will apply to us. Section 203 of the DGCL
prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in
a business combination transaction with an interested
stockholder for a period of three years after the interested
stockholder became such unless the transaction fits within an
applicable exemption, such as board approval of the business
combination or the transaction which resulted in such
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder. The provisions
of Section 203 of the DGCL may delay, prevent or deter a
merger, acquisition, tender offer or other transaction that
might otherwise result in our stockholders receiving a premium
over the market price for their common stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides
that the doctrine of corporate opportunity does not apply to
Apax Partners, funds advised by Apax Partners, or any of our
directors who are employees of or affiliated with Apax Partners,
acting on Apax Partners behalf, or funds advised by Apax
Partners, in a manner that would prohibit them from investing or
participating in competing businesses. To the extent they invest
in such other
26
businesses, Apax Partners or funds advised by Apax Partners may
have differing interests than our other stockholders.
Our
stock price may be volatile or may decline regardless of our
operating performance or other factors.
Shares of our common stock were sold in our initial public
offering in November 2009 at a price of $19.00 per share, and
our common stock has subsequently traded as high as $37.63
during the period from our initial public offering to
January 29, 2011. There can be no assurance that the market
price of our common stock will not continue to fluctuate The
market price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially in
response to a number of factors, most of which we cannot control.
In addition, the stock markets, and in particular The NASDAQ
Global Select Market, have experienced extreme price and volume
fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the
market prices of equity securities of many retail companies. In
the past, stockholders have instituted securities class action
litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were
involved in securities litigation, we could incur substantial
costs and our resources and the attention of management could be
diverted from our business.
Anti-takeover
provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law might
discourage or delay acquisition attempts for us that you might
consider favorable.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make the
acquisition of our company more difficult without the approval
of our board of directors. These provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
establish a classified board of directors so that not all
members of our board of directors are elected at one time;
|
|
|
|
authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the
terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be
issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super
voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or
preferences superior to the rights of the holders of common
stock;
|
|
|
|
prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which requires
all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
provide that the board of directors is expressly authorized to
make, alter, or repeal our amended and restated bylaws; and
|
|
|
|
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for
elections to our board of directors or for proposing matters
that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.
|
These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under
Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction
involving a change in control of our company, even if doing so
would benefit our stockholders. These provisions could also
discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and
other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and to
cause us to take other corporate actions you desire.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments.
|
None.
We do not own any real property. Our principal executive office
is located in Warrendale, Pennsylvania and is leased under a
lease agreement expiring in 2017, with an option to renew for an
additional five-year term. The 60,633 square foot space
includes two
state-of-the-art
simulated stores that provide a forum for planning, visual and
marketing concepts prior to their execution in our stores. We
are undergoing an expansion of our executive offices to support
our growth, and will be adding approximately an additional
23,000 square feet by the end of 2011.
Our 189,600 square foot distribution facility is located in
Weirton, West Virginia. Our distribution facility is leased
under a lease agreement expiring in 2012, with an option to
renew for an additional five-year term. We are re-
27
negotiating the lease agreement for our distribution facility in
order to account for an expansion in 2011 that will provide us
with an additional 180,000 square feet for storage space,
additional receiving docks, and improved truck circulation. This
will enable the distribution facility to better support our
store expansion and inventory distribution strategies.
As of January 29, 2011, we operated 638 stores in
609 cities in 44 states. All of our stores are leased
from third parties and the leases typically have terms of five
to ten years with options to renew for additional five-year
periods thereafter. Most of our leases have early cancellation
clauses, which permit the lease to be terminated by us or the
landlord if certain sales levels are not met in specific periods
or if a shopping center does not meet specified occupancy
standards. In addition to future minimum lease payments, most of
our store leases provide for additional rental payments based on
a percentage of net sales if sales at the respective stores
exceed specified levels, as well as the payment of common area
maintenance charges, real property insurance and real estate
taxes. Many of our lease agreements have defined escalating rent
provisions over the initial term and any extensions.
We believe that with the planned expansions of our executive
offices and distribution facility, our facilities are generally
adequate for current and anticipated future use.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
We are subject to various legal proceedings and claims which
arise in the ordinary course of our business. If a potential
loss arising from these lawsuits, claims and pending actions is
probable and reasonably estimable, we record the estimated
liability based on circumstances and assumptions existing at the
time. Management does not believe that the outcome of current
litigation will have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated results of operations or financial condition, and
believes that the recorded liabilities are adequate. However,
there are inherent limitations in projecting the outcome of
these matters and in the estimation process, and if future
actual liabilities exceed projected liabilities, it could have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition
or on our operations.
Part II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Our common stock has been listed on The NASDAQ Global Select
Market under the symbol rue since our initial public
offering on November 13, 2009. Before then, there was no
public market for our common stock. The following table sets
forth the high and low sales prices of our common stock per
share, as reported by The NASDAQ Global Select Market. The
number of holders of record of our stock as of December 31,
2010 was approximately 110.
The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of
our common stock per share, as reported by The NASDAQ Global
Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
4th Quarter (Commencing November 13, 2009)
|
|
$
|
32.82
|
|
|
$
|
22.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2010
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
1st Quarter (January 31, 2010)
|
|
$
|
37.63
|
|
|
$
|
26.45
|
|
2nd Quarter (May 2, 2010)
|
|
$
|
36.57
|
|
|
$
|
27.75
|
|
3rd Quarter (August 1, 2010)
|
|
$
|
30.64
|
|
|
$
|
20.28
|
|
4th Quarter (October 31, 2010)
|
|
$
|
33.80
|
|
|
$
|
25.50
|
|
28
Dividends
The continued operation and expansion of our business will
require substantial funding. Accordingly, we do not anticipate
that we will pay any cash dividends on shares of our common
stock for the foreseeable future. Any determination to pay
dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board
of directors and will depend upon results of operations,
financial condition, contractual restrictions, including our
senior secured credit facility and other indebtedness we may
incur, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors
our board of directors deems relevant.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
The information incorporated by reference in Item 12 of
this Annual Report from our 2011 Proxy Statement under the
heading Equity Compensation Plan Information is
hereby incorporated by reference into this Item 5.
Stock
Price Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative stockholder return
on our common stock from November 13, 2009 (the date of our
initial public offering) through January 29, 2011 with the
return on the Total Return Index for the NASDAQ Stock Market (US
securities only) and the NASDAQ Retail Trade Stocks. The graph
assumes $100 invested on November 13, 2009, in the stock of
rue21, inc. the NASDAQ Global Stock Market (US securities only),
and the NASDAQ Retail Trade Stocks. It also assumes that all
dividends are reinvested.
Comparison of Cumulative Total Return
Assumes Initial Investment of $100
January 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement Period(1)
|
|
|
|
11/13/2009
|
|
|
1/30/2010
|
|
|
1/29/2011
|
Rue21, inc.
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
147.53
|
|
|
|
|
155.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASDAQ Stock Market (US securities only)
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
98.17
|
|
|
|
|
126.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASDAQ Retail Trade Index
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
102.71
|
|
|
|
|
128.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Returns are based upon the premise that $100 is invested in each
of (a) our common stock, (b) NASDAQ Stock Market (US
securities only), and (c) the index of NASDAQ Retail Trade
Stocks on November 13, 2009, and that all dividends (if
any) were reinvested. Stockholder returns over the indicated
period should not be considered indicative of future shareholder
returns. |
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities
Not applicable.
29
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Consolidated Financial Data.
|
The following selected financial data are derived from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company. We have also
included certain non-financial operating data to enhance your
understanding of our business. The data set forth below should
be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in Item 7 and the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes herein. The
historical results presented below are not necessarily
indicative of results of operations to be expected for any
future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
February 2,
|
|
|
February 3,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share and operating data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Income Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
634,728
|
|
|
$
|
525,600
|
|
|
$
|
391,414
|
|
|
$
|
296,887
|
|
|
$
|
225,559
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
399,896
|
|
|
|
337,693
|
|
|
|
257,853
|
|
|
|
195,034
|
|
|
|
150,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
234,832
|
|
|
|
187,907
|
|
|
|
133,561
|
|
|
|
101,853
|
|
|
|
75,396
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense
|
|
|
163,006
|
|
|
|
134,078
|
|
|
|
99,886
|
|
|
|
76,039
|
|
|
|
57,575
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
21,852
|
|
|
|
16,898
|
|
|
|
11,532
|
|
|
|
8,241
|
|
|
|
5,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
49,974
|
|
|
|
36,931
|
|
|
|
22,143
|
|
|
|
17,573
|
|
|
|
11,895
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
2,645
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
19,528
|
|
|
|
14,382
|
|
|
|
8,027
|
|
|
|
5,920
|
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
30,244
|
|
|
$
|
22,017
|
|
|
$
|
12,639
|
|
|
$
|
9,133
|
|
|
$
|
7,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
24,277
|
|
|
|
22,267
|
|
|
|
21,914
|
|
|
|
21,705
|
|
|
|
19,782
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
25,002
|
|
|
|
23,037
|
|
|
|
22,814
|
|
|
|
22,842
|
|
|
|
21,888
|
|
Operating Data (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable store sales change
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
Number of stores open at end of period
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Total gross square feet end of period (in thousands)
|
|
|
2,989
|
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
1,095
|
|
Store conversions during period
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Capital expenditures (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
40,480
|
|
|
$
|
33,630
|
|
|
$
|
26,464
|
|
|
$
|
20,265
|
|
|
$
|
16,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
January 31,
|
|
February 2,
|
|
February 3,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
50,111
|
|
|
$
|
26,751
|
|
|
$
|
4,611
|
|
|
$
|
3,343
|
|
|
$
|
2,525
|
|
Working capital (deficit)
|
|
|
49,723
|
|
|
|
21,604
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
3,946
|
|
|
|
(622
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
|
260,791
|
|
|
|
188,431
|
|
|
|
141,200
|
|
|
|
102,285
|
|
|
|
79,092
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,476
|
|
|
|
27,968
|
|
|
|
23,317
|
|
Stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
102,129
|
|
|
|
67,448
|
|
|
|
18,393
|
|
|
|
5,753
|
|
|
|
(3,537
|
)
|
Cash Flow Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash from operations
|
|
$
|
61,643
|
|
|
$
|
48,779
|
|
|
$
|
36,589
|
|
|
$
|
21,512
|
|
|
$
|
17,480
|
|
30
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
You should read the following discussion together with
Selected Consolidated Financial Data, and the
historical financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The statements in this discussion regarding industry outlook,
our expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and
capital resources and other non-historical statements in this
discussion are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and
uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and
uncertainties described in Part I Item 1A
Risk Factors. Our actual results may differ
materially from those contained in or implied by any
forward-looking statements.
We operate on a fiscal calendar widely used by the retail
industry that results in a given fiscal year consisting of a 52-
or 53-week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31
of the following year. For example, references to fiscal
year 2010 refer to the fiscal year ended January 29,
2011. Our fiscal year 2006 consisted of a 53-week period and
ended on February 3, 2007.
Overview
rue21 is a fast growing specialty apparel retailer offering the
newest fashion trends for girls and guys at value prices. We
were originally founded in 1976 as a value-focused specialty
apparel retailer. In 1998, we were acquired by certain funds now
advised by Apax Partners, through SKM Equity Fund II, L.P.
and SKM Investment Fund II. In 2001, our current President
and Chief Executive Officer, Bob Fisch, joined us. Upon his
hiring, Bob Fisch began repositioning our company by aligning
our stores under one brand name, strengthening our management
team, honing our fashion value merchandise approach and
refocusing our store growth strategy. In late 2006, we
introduced our larger rue21 etc! store layout, which averages
approximately 5,000 square feet and features a separate
store-in-store
for our rue21 etc! girls jewelry and accessories category. As of
January 29, 2011, we operated 638 stores in 44 states,
449 of which featured the larger rue21 etc! store layout.
Our strong growth and operating results reflect the initiatives
taken by our management team, as well as the increasing
acceptance of our brand and merchandise. Our net sales increased
from $225.6 million in fiscal year 2006 to
$634.7 million in fiscal year 2010, a compound annual
growth rate of 29.5%. Over the same period, we grew income from
operations from $11.9 million to $50.0 million, a
compound annual growth rate of 43.2%. Since the beginning of
fiscal year 2006, we have increased our store base from 229
stores to 638 stores as of January 29, 2011. Our total
square footage growth has outpaced our total store growth over
this same period, reflecting the increasing size of our average
store.
We expect to continue our strong growth in the future. We
believe there is a significant opportunity to grow our store
base to more than 1,000 stores. We plan to open 110 stores in
fiscal year 2011. We also plan to continue to convert our
existing stores into the larger rue21 etc! layout, which allows
us to offer an increased proportion of higher margin categories,
such as accessories, intimate apparel, footwear and fragrances.
We converted 31 stores to the rue21 etc! layout in fiscal year
2010 and plan to convert 35 stores in fiscal year 2011. We
expect to continue to drive our comparable store sales by
increasing the penetration of our newer product categories,
increasing our brand awareness, continuing to provide our
distinctive in-store experience and converting stores to the
rue21 etc! layout.
Our growth in total square footage is supported by our store
economics, which we believe to be very attractive. As a result
of our low store build-out costs, favorable lease terms and
low-cost operating model, our stores generate strong returns on
investment. We focus our real estate strategy on strip centers,
regional malls and outlet centers, primarily in small- and
middle-market communities, which we believe are underserved by
traditional junior and young mens specialty apparel
retailers. Our typical new store investment is approximately
$160,000, which includes build-out costs, net of landlord tenant
allowances and initial inventory, net of payables. New stores
generate on average between $900,000 and $1.1 million in
net sales per store in the first twelve months. However, new
stores opened in the future may not generate similar net sales
in the first twelve months or pay back our investment in a
similar time period.
We continue to invest the capital necessary to build our
infrastructure and support our future growth. In 2010 we
initiated expansion plans at our corporate headquarters in
Warrendale, Pennsylvania, and in 2011 we will be
31
expanding the footprint of our distribution facility in Weirton,
West Virginia. We also continue to invest in our systems
infrastructure, including implementation of the latest store
merchandising, supply chain, financial and real estate
applications.
We believe our business strategy will continue to offer
significant opportunity, but it also presents risks and
challenges. These risks and challenges include that we may not
be able to effectively identify and respond to changing fashion
trends and customer preferences, that we may not be able to find
desirable locations in strip centers and regional malls or that
we may not be able to effectively manage our operations which
have grown rapidly, or our future growth. We seek to ensure that
addressing these risks does not divert our managements
attention from continuing to build on the strengths that we
believe have driven the growth of our business. We believe our
focus on maintaining the desirability of our products to our
customers, maintaining and scaling our supply chain resources
and improving our in-store shopping experience and our customer
service will contribute to our ongoing success.
How We
Assess the Performance of Our Business
In assessing the performance of our business, we consider a
variety of performance and financial measures. The key measures
for determining how our business is performing are net sales,
comparable store and non-comparable store sales, gross profit
margin and selling, general and administrative expense.
Net
Sales
Net sales constitute gross sales net of any returns and
merchandise discounts. Net sales consist of sales from
comparable stores and non-comparable stores.
Comparable
Store Sales
A store is included in comparable store sales on the first day
of the sixteenth month after its opening, as new stores
generally open with above run-rate sales volumes, which usually
extend for a period of at least three months, and comparability
generally is achieved twelve months after the initial
three-month period after store opening. Comparable store sales
include existing stores that have been converted to our rue21
etc! layout. When a store that is included in comparable store
sales is in the process of being converted to our rue21 etc!
layout, net sales from that store remain in comparable store
sales. There may be variations in the way in which some of our
competitors and other apparel retailers calculate comparable or
same store sales. As a result, data in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
regarding our comparable store sales may not be comparable to
similar data made available by other retailers. Non-comparable
store sales include sales not included in comparable store sales
and sales from closed stores.
Measuring the change in
year-over-year
comparable store sales allows us to evaluate how our store base
is performing. Various factors affect comparable store sales,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
consumer preferences, buying trends and overall economic trends;
|
|
|
|
our ability to identify and respond effectively to fashion
trends and customer preferences;
|
|
|
|
competition;
|
|
|
|
changes in our merchandise mix;
|
|
|
|
pricing;
|
|
|
|
the timing of our releases of new merchandise and promotional
events;
|
|
|
|
the level of customer service that we provide in our stores;
|
|
|
|
our ability to source and distribute products
efficiently; and
|
|
|
|
the number of stores we open, close and convert in any period.
|
32
As we continue to pursue our store growth strategy, we expect
that a significant percentage of our net sales increase will
continue to come from non-comparable store sales. Opening new
stores is an important part of our growth strategy. Accordingly,
comparable store sales is only one element we use to assess the
success of our growth strategy.
The retail apparel industry is cyclical, and consequently our
net sales are affected by general economic conditions. Purchases
of apparel and accessories are sensitive to a number of factors
that influence the levels of consumer spending, including
economic conditions and the level of disposable consumer income,
consumer debt, interest rates and consumer confidence.
Our business is seasonal and as a result, our net sales
fluctuate from quarter to quarter. Net sales are usually higher
in the second through fourth fiscal quarters, and particularly
in the months of August and December, as customers make
back-to-school
and holiday purchases.
Gross
Profit
Gross profit is equal to our net sales minus our cost of goods
sold. Gross margin measures gross profit as a percentage of our
net sales. Cost of goods sold includes the direct cost of
purchased merchandise, distribution center costs, all freight
costs incurred to get merchandise to our stores, store occupancy
costs and buying costs. The components of our cost of goods sold
may not be comparable to those of other retailers.
Our cost of goods sold is substantially higher in higher volume
quarters because cost of goods sold generally increases as net
sales increase. Changes in the mix of our products, such as
changes in the proportion of accessories, may also impact our
overall cost of goods sold. We review our inventory levels on an
ongoing basis in order to identify slow-moving merchandise, and
generally use markdowns to clear that merchandise. The timing
and level of markdowns are not seasonal in nature but are driven
by customer acceptance of our merchandise. If we misjudge the
market for our products, we may be faced with significant excess
inventories for some products and be required to mark down those
products in order to sell them. Significant markdowns have
reduced our gross profit in some prior periods and may have a
material adverse impact on our earnings for future periods
depending on the amount of the markdowns and the amount of
merchandise affected.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense includes
administration, stock-based compensation and store expenses but
excludes store occupancy costs and freight to stores. These
expenses do not generally vary proportionally with net sales. As
a result, selling, general and administrative expense as a
percentage of net sales is usually higher in lower volume
quarters and lower in higher volume quarters. The components of
our selling, general and administrative expense may not be
comparable to those of other retailers. We expect that our
selling, general and administrative expense will increase in
future periods due to our continuing store growth and has
increased significantly in fiscal 2010 due to additional legal,
accounting, insurance and other expenses we incurred as a result
of being a public company and compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act and related rules and regulations.
33
Results
of Operations
The following tables summarize key components of our results of
operations for the periods indicated, both in dollars and as a
percentage of net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except operating data)
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
634,728
|
|
|
$
|
525,600
|
|
|
$
|
391,414
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
399,896
|
|
|
|
337,693
|
|
|
|
257,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
234,832
|
|
|
|
187,907
|
|
|
|
133,561
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
163,006
|
|
|
|
134,078
|
|
|
|
99,886
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
21,852
|
|
|
|
16,898
|
|
|
|
11,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
49,974
|
|
|
|
36,931
|
|
|
|
22,143
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
49,772
|
|
|
|
36,399
|
|
|
|
20,666
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
19,528
|
|
|
|
14,382
|
|
|
|
8,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
30,244
|
|
|
$
|
22,017
|
|
|
$
|
12,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of stores open at the end of the period
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Gross square feet at the end of the period (in thousands)
|
|
|
2,989
|
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
Comparable store sales change
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
63.0
|
%
|
|
|
64.2
|
%
|
|
|
65.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
37.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.8
|
%
|
|
|
34.1
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The approximate percentage of our net sales derived from our
product categories, based on our internal merchandising system,
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Girls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apparel
|
|
|
55.9
|
%
|
|
|
56.7
|
%
|
|
|
58.3
|
%
|
Accessories
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
Guys Apparel and Accessories
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
|
|
18.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
The following table summarizes the number of stores open at the
beginning of the period and at the end of the period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Stores at beginning of period
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
Stores opened during period(1)
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Stores closed during period
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stores at end of period
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
Store conversions during the period
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stores opened during period do not include existing stores that
have been converted. |
Fiscal
Year 2010 Compared to Fiscal Year 2009
Net
Sales
In fiscal year 2010, our net sales increased 20.8%, or
$109.1 million, to $634.7 million from
$525.6 million in fiscal year 2009. This increase in net
sales was due to an increase of approximately 20.3% in the
number of transactions, primarily driven by new store openings.
During fiscal year 2010, we opened 105 new stores and closed 2
stores compared to 88 new stores and 2 store closures in fiscal
year 2009. Our comparable store sales increased 2.1% in fiscal
year 2010 compared to an increase of 7.8% in fiscal year 2009.
Comparable store sales increased by $115.6 million and
non-comparable store sales decreased by $6.5 million for
fiscal year 2010 compared to fiscal year 2009. There were 523
comparable stores and 115 non-comparable stores open at
January 29, 2011 compared to 417 and 118, respectively, at
January 30, 2010.
In fiscal year 2010, net sales of girls apparel, girls
accessories and guys apparel and accessories represented 55.9%,
25.7% and 18.4%, respectively, of total net sales compared to
56.7%, 24.3% and 19.0%, respectively, for fiscal year 2009. For
fiscal year 2010, the girls apparel, girls accessories and guys
apparel and accessories categories grew by approximately 19.0%,
27.8% and 17.1%, respectively, as compared to fiscal year 2009.
Gross
Profit
Gross profit increased 25.0%, or $46.9 million, in fiscal
year 2010 to $234.8 million from $187.9 million in
fiscal year 2009. Gross margin increased 120 basis points
to 37.0% for fiscal year 2010 from 35.8% for fiscal year 2009.
This increase was attributable to a 120 basis point
increase in merchandise margin, primarily due to an improvement
in our initial
mark-up rate
in fiscal year 2010. Gross margin as a percent of sales was not
impacted by store occupancy, distribution and buying costs, as
these costs were flat as a rate to net sales in fiscal year 2010
compared to fiscal year 2009.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense increased 21.6%, or
$28.9 million to $163.0 million in fiscal year 2010
from $134.1 million in fiscal year 2009. As a percentage of
net sales, selling, general and administrative expense increased
20 basis points to 25.7% in fiscal year 2010 as compared to
25.5% in fiscal year 2009. In fiscal year 2010, we incurred
$3.1 million in public company expenses and stock-based
compensation expense of $2.2 million. In fiscal year 2009,
we incurred $2.5 million in public company expenses and
stock-based compensation expense of $0.4 million. In
November 2009, we and Apax Partners, L.P (Apax) agreed to
terminate the letter agreement relating to financial advisory
services provided to the Company. As part of termination
agreement, we were required to pay Apax a one-time termination
fee of $1.5 million, which is included as a component of
public company expenses in fiscal year 2009. Excluding the
impact of these items, selling, general and administrative
expenses as a percentage of net sales, would have leveraged
10 basis points in fiscal year 2010.
Store operating expenses increased by $20.4 million
primarily resulting from the operation of 638 stores as of
January 29, 2011 compared to the operation of 535 stores as
of January 30, 2010. As a percentage of net sales, store
operating expenses were flat at 18.6% in each of fiscal year
2010 and fiscal year 2009.
35
Administrative and general expenses increased as a percentage of
net sales to 7.1% in fiscal year 2010 as compared to 6.9% in
fiscal year 2009 due primarily to the incremental public company
and stock-based compensation expenses as discussed above.
Excluding the impact of the incremental public company and
stock-based compensation expenses, administrative and general
expenses as a percentage of net sales, would have decreased to
6.2% in fiscal year 2010 as compared to 6.3% in fiscal year 2009.
Depreciation
and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense increased as a percentage
of net sales to 3.4% in fiscal year 2010 from 3.2% in fiscal
year 2009, or $5.0 million. The increase in depreciation
and amortization expense was primarily due to the continued
opening of new stores and conversions, investments in
information technology and the completion of the distribution
center expansion during fiscal year 2010.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The increase in provision for income taxes of $5.1 million
in fiscal year 2010 from fiscal year 2009 was due primarily to a
$13.4 million increase in pre-tax income. The effective tax
rate was at 39.2% in fiscal year 2010 as compared to 39.5% in
fiscal year 2009. This rate decrease was the result of state tax
credits offset by non-deductible expenses in fiscal year 2010.
Net
Income
Net income increased 37.4%, or $8.2 million, to
$30.2 million in fiscal year 2010 from $22.0 million
in fiscal year 2009. This increase was due to the factors
discussed above.
Fiscal
Year 2009 Compared to Fiscal Year 2008
Net
Sales
In fiscal year 2009, our net sales increased 34.3%, or
$134.2 million, to $525.6 million from
$391.4 million in fiscal year 2008. This increase in net
sales was due to an increase of approximately 33% in the number
of transactions, primarily driven by new store openings and an
increase of approximately 1% in the average dollar value of
transactions per store. During fiscal year 2009, we opened 88
new stores and closed 2 stores compared to 99 new stores
and 2 store closures in fiscal year 2008. Our comparable store
sales increased 7.8% in fiscal year 2009 compared to an increase
of 3.7% in fiscal year 2008. Comparable store sales increased by
$100.5 million and non-comparable store sales increased by
$33.7 million for fiscal year 2009 compared to fiscal year
2008. There were 417 comparable stores and 118
non-comparable stores open at January 30, 2010 compared to
330 and 119, respectively, at January 31, 2009.
In fiscal year 2009, net sales of girls apparel, girls
accessories and guys apparel and accessories represented 56.7%,
24.3% and 19.0%, respectively, of total net sales compared to
58.3%, 23.5% and 18.2%, respectively, for fiscal year 2008. For
fiscal year 2009, the girls accessories and guys apparel and
accessories categories grew by approximately 39% and 40%,
respectively. The girls apparel category grew by approximately
31%. The increase in the guys apparel and accessories category
as a percentage of net sales was due to management efforts to
expand the number of items in the guys apparel and accessories
category.
Gross
Profit
Gross profit increased 40.7%, or $54.3 million, in fiscal
year 2009 to $187.9 million from $133.6 million in
fiscal year 2008. Gross margin increased 170 basis points
to 35.8% for fiscal year 2009 from 34.1% for fiscal year 2008.
This increase was attributable to a 90 basis point increase
in merchandise margin, due primarily to lower merchandise costs
throughout most of fiscal year 2009. Gross margin as a percent
of sales was also positively impacted by an 80 basis point
decrease in store occupancy, distribution and buying costs, as
these costs increased at a rate lower than net sales.
36
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense increased 34.2%, or
$34.2 million to $134.1 million in fiscal year 2009
from $99.9 million in fiscal year 2008. As a percentage of
net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses remained
constant at 25.5% in fiscal year 2009 as compared to fiscal year
2008. In November 2009, we and Apax Partners, L.P (Apax) agreed
to terminate the letter agreement relating to financial advisory
services provided to the Company. As part of the termination
agreement, we were required to pay Apax a one-time termination
fee of $1.5 million, which is included in selling, general
and administrative expenses. Additionally, our expense related
to our stock-based awards increased by $0.4 million to
$0.4 million for fiscal year 2009, as compared to $0 for
fiscal year 2008. Excluding the impact of these items, selling,
general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net
sales, would have decreased to 25.1% in fiscal year 2009.
Store operating expenses increased by $24.5 million
primarily resulting from the operation of 535 stores as of
January 30, 2010 compared to the operation of 449 stores as
of January 31, 2009. As a percentage of net sales, store
operating expenses decreased slightly to 18.5% in fiscal year
2009 from 18.6% in fiscal year 2008.
Depreciation
and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense increased as a percentage
of net sales to 3.2% in fiscal year 2009 from 2.9% in fiscal
year 2008, or $5.4 million. The increase was due to the
growth in capital expenditures of $7.1 million and
$6.2 million in fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2008,
respectively.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The increase in provision for income taxes of $6.4 million
in fiscal year 2009 from fiscal year 2008 was due primarily to a
$15.7 million increase in pre-tax income. The effective tax
rate increased to 39.5% in fiscal year 2009 from 38.8% in fiscal
year 2008. This increase was the result of an increase in the
amount of non-deductible expenses in fiscal year 2009.
Net
Income
Net income increased 74.2%, or $9.4 million, to
$22.0 million in fiscal year 2009 from $12.6 million
in fiscal year 2008. This increase was due to the factors
discussed above.
Fiscal
Year 2008 Compared to Fiscal Year 2007
Net
Sales
Net sales increased 31.8%, or $94.5 million, to
$391.4 million in fiscal year 2008 from $296.9 million
in fiscal year 2007. The increase in net sales was due to an
increase of approximately 23% in the number of transactions,
driven by new store openings and an increase of approximately 2%
in the average dollar value of transactions per store.
Comparable store sales increased 3.7% for fiscal year 2008
compared to an increase of 7.8% for fiscal year 2007. Comparable
store sales increased by $66.7 million and non-comparable
store sales increased by $27.8 million. There were 330
comparable stores and 119 non-comparable stores open at
January 31, 2009 compared to 260 and 92, respectively, at
February 2, 2008.
The increase in the girls accessories and guys apparel and
accessories categories as a percentage of net sales and the
approximate corresponding decrease in the girls apparel category
as a percentage of net sales was reflective of varying category
sales growth rates. The girls accessories and guys apparel and
accessories categories grew by approximately 42% and 45%,
respectively. Girls apparel category growth was approximately
25%. The increase in girls accessories as a percentage of net
sales was due to management efforts to expand the number of
items in the girls accessories category.
37
Gross
Profit
Gross profit increased 31.1%, or $31.7 million, in fiscal
year 2008 to $133.6 million from $101.9 million in
fiscal year 2007. Gross margin decreased 20 basis points to
34.1% for fiscal year 2008 from 34.3% for fiscal year 2007. This
decrease was primarily attributable to a 30 basis point
decrease in merchandise margin, due primarily to increased
markdowns. Gross margin was positively impacted by a
10 basis point increase in store occupancy, distribution
and buying costs, as these costs increased at a rate lower than
net sales.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense increased 31.4%, or
$23.8 million, to $99.9 million in fiscal year 2008
from $76.0 million in fiscal year 2007. As a percentage of
net sales, selling, general and administrative expense remained
relatively constant at 25.5% and 25.6% in fiscal year 2008 and
fiscal year 2007, respectively.
Store operating expenses increased by $18.6 million
primarily resulting from the operation of 449 stores as of
January 31, 2009 compared to the operation of 352 stores as
of February 2, 2008. As a percentage of net sales, store
operating expenses increased to 18.6% in fiscal year 2008 from
18.3% in fiscal year 2007, due primarily to increased store
salaries as a percentage of net sales.
Administrative and general expenses decreased as a percentage of
net sales to 6.9% in fiscal year 2008 from 7.4% in fiscal year
2007 as these costs increased at a lower rate than net sales.
Offsetting the decrease in administrative expense margin was a
$434,000 asset write-off related to store conversions.
Depreciation
and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense increased as a percentage
of net sales to 2.9% in fiscal year 2008 from 2.8% in fiscal
year 2007, or $3.3 million. The increase was due to growth
in capital expenditures of $6.2 million and $3.7 in fiscal
year 2008 and fiscal year 2007, respectively.
Interest
Expense, Net
Interest expense, net decreased by $1.0 million to
$1.5 million in fiscal year 2008 due to both reduced
weighted average borrowings and a reduced average interest rate
under our senior secured credit facility.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The increase in provision for income taxes of $2.1 million
in fiscal year 2008 from fiscal year 2007 was due primarily to a
$5.6 million increase in pre-tax income. The effective tax
rate declined to 38.8% in fiscal year 2008 from 39.3% in fiscal
year 2007.
Net
Income
Net income increased 38.4%, or $3.5 million, to
$12.6 million in fiscal year 2008 from $9.1 million in
fiscal year 2007. This increase was due primarily to a
$31.7 million increase in gross profit and lower interest
expense, partially offset by increases in selling, general and
administrative expense of $23.8 million, higher
depreciation and amortization expense of $3.3 million and a
higher provision for income taxes of $2.1 million.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our primary source of liquidity is cash flows from operations.
Our primary cash needs are generally for capital expenditures
incurred in connection with the opening of new stores, the
conversion of existing stores, and for the related increase in
merchandise inventories. Cash is also required for investment in
information technology and distribution facility enhancements
and funding normal working capital requirements. The most
significant components of our working capital are cash and cash
equivalents, merchandise inventories, accounts payable and other
current liabilities. Our working capital position benefits from
the fact that we generally collect cash from sales to customers
the same day or, in the case of credit or debit card
transactions, within several days of the related sale, and we
typically have up to 75 to 90 days to pay our vendors.
38
As of January 29, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents
totaling $50.1 million. Our cash and cash equivalents
consist of cash on deposit and credit and debit card
transactions. Our cash and cash equivalents balance at
January 29, 2011 increased by $23.3 million from
$26.8 million at January 31, 2010. Components of this
change in cash for fiscal year 2010, as well as for change in
cash for the fiscal years 2009 and 2008, are provided below in
more detail.
A summary of operating, investing and financing activities are
shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
61,643
|
|
|
$
|
48,779
|
|
|
$
|
36,859
|
|
Used for investing activities
|
|
|
(40,480
|
)
|
|
|
(33,630
|
)
|
|
|
(26,464
|
)
|
Provided by (used for) for financing activities
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
|
|
6,991
|
|
|
|
(9,127
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
23,360
|
|
|
$
|
22,140
|
|
|
$
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities
Operating activities consist primarily of net income adjusted
for non-cash items, including depreciation and amortization,
deferred taxes, the effect of working capital changes and tenant
allowances received from landlords.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
30,244
|
|
|
$
|
22,017
|
|
|
$
|
12,639
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21,852
|
|
|
|
16,994
|
|
|
|
11,624
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
2,240
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise inventory
|
|
|
(23,358
|
)
|
|
|
(5,855
|
)
|
|
|
(19,685
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
22,112
|
|
|
|
(486
|
)
|
|
|
24,134
|
|
Other working capital components
|
|
|
8,994
|
|
|
|
14,544
|
|
|
|
5,679
|
|
All other
|
|
|
(1,105
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
61,643
|
|
|
$
|
48,779
|
|
|
$
|
36,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal year 2010, we generated $61.6 million in cash
from operating activities; as compared to $48.8 million
during fiscal year 2009 and $36.9 million in fiscal year
2008. Our major source of cash from operations was attributable
to an increase in net income of $8.2 million and an
increase in accounts payable of $22.1 million. Net cash was
reduced for additional merchandise inventory required by
operations of $23.4 million.
During fiscal year 2009, we generated $48.8 million in cash
from operating activities; as compared to $36.9 million in
fiscal year 2008, an increase of $11.9 million. This
increase in cash from operating activities was primarily
attributable to an increase in net income of $9.4 million,
which includes the one-time termination fee of $1.5 million
paid to Apax, an increase in non-cash depreciation and
amortization of $5.4 million, which reflects our increased
level of cumulative capital investments over the past several
fiscal years and improvements in our requirements for
merchandise inventory of $13.8 million as compared to
fiscal year 2008. In addition, other working capital components
increased by $8.9 million due to increases in accrued
expenses and in tenant allowances received from landlords as a
result of new store openings. These cash inflows and
improvements were offset by reduction in the level of accounts
payable, which decreased our cash from operating activities by
$24.6 million as compared to fiscal year 2008.
39
Investing
Activities
Investing activities consist entirely of capital expenditures
for new and converted stores, as well as investment in
information technology and our distribution and headquarter
facility enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, net of tenant allowances
|
|
$
|
(25,462
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,297
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,555
|
)
|
Tenant allowances
|
|
|
(15,018
|
)
|
|
|
(9,333
|
)
|
|
|
(8,909
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
|
$
|
(40,480
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33,630
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,464
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal year 2010, capital expenditures, net of tenant
allowances increased $1.2 million as compared to fiscal
year 2009. Capital expenditures, net of tenant allowances, for
the opening of new stores and conversions were
$16.2 million, $11.5 million and $10.9 million in
fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The remaining
capital expenditures in fiscal year 2010 were primarily due to
increases in fixture refreshes, distribution center and
information technology infrastructure investments.
While there can be no assurance that current expectations will
be realized, the Company expects capital expenditures, net of
tenant allowances to be approximately $38.0 to
$40.0 million in fiscal year 2011.
Financing
Activities
Financing activities consist principally of proceeds from the
exercise of employee stock options and excess tax benefits from
share-based award activities, proceeds from our initial public
offering in fiscal year 2009, along with net borrowings under
our credit facilities in prior fiscal years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net (payments) borrowings under revolver
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(19,476
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,645
|
|
Payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,326
|
)
|
Proceeds from initial public offering, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
|
|
$
|
2,197
|
|
|
$
|
6,991
|
|
|
$
|
(9,127
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash of $2.2 million was provided by financing
activities in fiscal year 2010, which was primarily utilized to
fund general corporate activities. During fiscal year 2010, we
received $0.7 million for the exercise of stock options,
and we recognized a $1.5 million excess tax benefit related
to share based award activities.
We completed our initial public offering (IPO) on
November 13, 2009, which resulted in net proceeds to us of
$29.2 million after deducting underwriters discounts
and commissions. We incurred legal and other costs related to
our IPO of approximately $3.0 million, which is included as
a reduction of additional paid-in capital. We used the net
proceeds to us from the IPO to repay the $25.8 million
outstanding under the senior secured credit facilities.
In addition, during fiscal year 2009, we received
$0.1 million for the exercise of stock options, we
recognized a $0.3 million excess tax benefit related to
share based award activities and incurred $0.2 million
amount in fees and expenses to amend our senior secured credit
facility.
Senior
Secured Credit Facility
Effective April 10, 2008, we established a five-year
$60.0 million senior secured credit facility with Bank of
America, N.A., which was amended on November 24, 2009. Key
provisions of the amendment included an increase
40
in the borrowing ceiling to $85 million from
$60 million, which is further expandable at our option in
increments of $5 million up to a maximum of
$100 million under certain defined conditions. Interest
accrues at the higher of the Federal Funds rate plus .50%, the
prime rate or the adjusted LIBOR rate plus 1.00% plus the
applicable margin which ranges from 1.25% to 3.00%. Availability
under our senior secured credit facility is collateralized by a
first priority interest in all of our assets.
Our senior secured credit facility accrues interest at the Bank
of America N.A. base rate, defined at our option as the prime
rate or the Eurodollar rate plus applicable margin, which ranges
from 1.25% to 3.00%, set quarterly depending upon average net
availability under our senior secured credit facility during the
previous quarter. The weighted-average interest rate under our
senior secured credit facility for the year ended
January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 was 0% and
2.75%, respectively. We had $85.0 million of availability
under our senior secured credit facility on January 29,
2011 and January 30, 2010, respectively, excluding our
option to expand the facility.
Our senior secured credit facility includes a fixed charge
covenant applicable only if net availability falls below a 10%
threshold. We are in compliance with all covenants under our
senior secured credit facility as of January 29, 2011 and
expect to remain in compliance for the next twelve months.
We believe that our cash position, net cash provided by
operating activities and availability under our senior secured
credit facility will be adequate to finance working capital
needs and planned capital expenditures for at least the next
twelve months.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are not a party to any off balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of
January 29, 2011 and the effect such obligations are
expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future
periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than 1 Year
|
|
|
1 - 3 Years
|
|
|
4 - 5 Years
|
|
|
More than 5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations(1)
|
|
|
291,469
|
|
|
|
51,342
|
|
|
|
89,413
|
|
|
|
63,613
|
|
|
|
87,101
|
|
Merchandise inventory purchase commitments
|
|
|
109,195
|
|
|
|
109,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
400,664
|
|
|
$
|
160,537
|
|
|
$
|
89,413
|
|
|
$
|
63,613
|
|
|
$
|
87,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes common area maintenance (CAM) charges, real estate
taxes and certain other expenses which amounted to approximately
22% of minimum lease obligations in fiscal year 2010 which we
expect to be consistent for the next three years. |
Impact of
Inflation
Our results of operations and financial condition are presented
based on historical cost. While it is difficult to accurately
measure the impact of inflation due to the imprecise nature of
the estimates required, we believe the effects of inflation, if
any, on our consolidated results of operations and financial
condition have been immaterial.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations is based upon our consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States. The preparation of these financial statements requires
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of our
assets, liabilities, net sales and expenses. Management bases
estimates on historical experience and other assumptions it
believes to be reasonable given the circumstances and evaluates
these
41
estimates on an ongoing basis. Actual results may differ from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies
involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity. See
Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for the
fiscal year ended January 29, 2011 for a complete
discussion of our significant accounting policies. The following
reflect the significant estimates and judgments used in the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue is recognized upon purchase of merchandise by customers.
Allowances for sales returns are recorded as a reduction of
sales in the periods in which the sales are recognized. Deferred
revenue is established upon the purchase of gift cards by
customers, and revenue is recognized upon redemption of gift
cards for merchandise.
Inventory
Valuation
We value merchandise inventory at the lower of cost
(first-in,
first-out basis) or market using the retail inventory method. We
record merchandise receipts at the time they are delivered to
our consolidator, as we do not directly import any merchandise.
This is the point at which title and risk of loss transfer to us.
We review our inventory levels to identify slow-moving
merchandise and generally use markdowns to clear slow-moving
merchandise. We record a markdown reserve based on estimated
future markdowns related to current inventory. Each period we
evaluate the selling trends experienced and the related
promotional events or pricing strategies in place to sell
through the current inventory levels. Markdowns may occur when
inventory exceeds customer demand for reasons of style, seasonal
adaptation, changes in customer preference, lack of consumer
acceptance of fashion items, competition, or if it is determined
that the inventory in stock will not sell at its currently
ticketed price. Such markdowns may have an adverse impact on
earnings, depending on the extent and amount of inventory
affected. The anticipated deployment of new seasonal merchandise
is reflected within the estimated future markdowns reserve used
in valuing current inventory, as such new inventory in certain
circumstances will displace merchandise units currently on-hand.
The markdown reserve is recorded as an increase to cost of goods
sold in the consolidated statements of income.
We also estimate a shrinkage reserve for the period of time
between the last physical count and the balance sheet date. The
estimate for shrinkage reserve can be affected by changes in
merchandise mix and changes in actual shrinkage trends.
Asset
Impairment
We are exposed to potential impairment if the book value of our
assets exceeds their expected future cash flows. The major
components of our long-lived assets are store fixtures,
equipment and leasehold improvements. We have recognized
impairment charges related to store conversions and may
recognize impairment charges in the future. The impairment of
unamortized costs is measured at the store level and the
unamortized cost is reduced to fair value if it is determined
that the sum of expected undiscounted future net cash flows
estimated to be generated by those assets is less than net book
value.
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with the authoritative
guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB), which requires the use of the asset and liability
method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recognized based on the difference between our consolidated
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using the tax rates, based on
certain judgments regarding enacted tax laws and published
guidance, in effect in the years when those temporary
differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is
established against the deferred tax assets when it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred taxes
may not be realized. Changes in the level and composition of
earnings, tax laws or the deferred tax valuation allowance, as
well as the results of tax audits may materially impact our
effective tax rate.
42
We recognize income tax liabilities related to unrecognized tax
benefits in accordance with the FASBs authoritative
guidance related to uncertain tax positions and adjust these
liabilities when our judgment changes as the result of the
evaluation of new information. We classify interest and
penalties as an element of tax expense.
The calculation of the deferred tax assets and liabilities, as
well as the decision to recognize a tax benefit from an
uncertain position and to establish a valuation allowance
require management to make estimates and assumptions. We believe
that our assumptions and estimates are reasonable, although
actual results may have a positive or negative material impact
on the balances of deferred tax assets and liabilities,
valuation allowances, or net income.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with the
FASBs authoritative guidance for stock-based compensation.
Under this guidance, stock-based compensation cost is estimated
at the grant date based on the awards fair value as
calculated by the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and is
recognized as expense over the requisite service period. The
Black-Scholes model requires various highly judgmental
assumptions including volatility, expected option life, risk
free interest rate and dividend yield. The expected volatility
reflects the application of SAB Topic 14s
interpretive guidance and, accordingly, incorporates historical
volatility of similar entities whose share prices are publicly
available. The expected option life reflects the application of
the simplified method set out in SAB Topic 14. The
simplified method defines the life as the average of the
contractual term of the options and the weighted-average vesting
period for all option tranches. The risk-free interest rate is
based on
5-year
U.S. Treasury instruments whose maturities are similar to
those of the expected term of the award being valued. The
expected dividend yield was based on our expectation of not
paying dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.
If any of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model change
significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ
materially in the future from that recorded in the current
period. In addition, we are required to estimate the expected
forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares
expected to vest. We estimate the forfeiture rate based on
historical experience. Further, to the extent our actual
forfeiture rate is different from our estimate; stock-based
compensation expense is adjusted accordingly.
Prior to our initial public offering on November 13, 2009,
all stock-based awards granted to employees had been incentive
stock options (ISOs). The recipient of an ISO must hold the
underlying shares for at least two years from the date of grant
and one year from the date of exercise in order to receive
favorable capital gains tax treatment on any profit
realized from the sale of those shares. If this holding period
is not met, a disqualifying disposition has occurred
and all or a portion of the profit realized by the individual is
taxed at ordinary income tax rates. If we include this profit in
an individuals taxable compensation, then we can deduct it
as compensation expense on our corporate tax return. These
benefits are generally recorded as a reduction to income taxes
payable. Under the FASBs authoritative guidance, we
account for any disqualifying dispositions under the individual
award method. We do not expect that the application of this
method to our accounting for disqualifying dispositions related
to ISOs currently outstanding will materially affect our
provision for income taxes or our effective tax rate for the
foreseeable future. Subsequent to our initial public offering,
all director and employee stock option grants have been
non-qualified options and restricted stock options.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued authoritative guidance in connection with adding
qualified special purpose entities into the scope of guidance
for consolidation of variable interest entities. This literature
also modifies the analysis by which a controlling interest of a
variable interest entity is determined thereby requiring the
controlling interest to consolidate the variable interest
entity. A controlling interest exists if a party to a variable
interest entity has both (i) the power to direct the
activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly
impact the entitys economic performance and (ii) the
obligation to absorb losses of or receive benefits from the
entity that could be potentially significant to the variable
interest entity. The guidance is effective as of the beginning
of the first annual reporting period beginning after
November 15, 2009 and will be applied prospectively for
interim and annual periods upon adoption. The Company has
adopted the guidance without any impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
43
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
2010-06,
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements
(ASU
2010-6). ASU
2010-6
amends the FASBs authoritative guidance related to fair
value measurements and disclosures to require additional
disclosures related to transfers between levels in the hierarchy
of fair value measurements. ASU
2010-6 is
effective for interim and annual fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2009. The standard does not change how fair
values are measured. The Company has adopted the guidance
without any impact on the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
Our principal market risk relates to interest rate sensitivity,
which is the risk that future changes in interest rates will
reduce our net income or net assets. Our senior secured credit
facility accrues interest at the Bank of America N.A. base rate,
defined at our option as the prime rate or the Eurodollar rate
plus applicable margin, which ranges from 1.25% to 3.00% set
quarterly dependent upon average net availability under our
senior secured credit facility during the previous quarter.
Because our senior secured credit facility bears interest at a
variable rate, we will be exposed to market risks relating to
changes in interest rates, if we have a meaningful outstanding
balance. As of January 29, 2011, we had no outstanding
borrowings under our revolving facility, nor did we have any
borrowings during fiscal year 2010. We had outstanding balances
under our senior secured credit facility during fiscal year 2009
prior to our initial public offering, but we do not believe we
are significantly exposed to changes in interest rate risk. We
currently do not engage in any interest rate hedging activity
and currently have no intention to do so in the foreseeable
future.
44
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
45
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of rue21, inc. and
subsidiary
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
rue21, inc. and subsidiary as of January 29, 2011
and January 30, 2010, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended January 29,
2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of rue21, inc. and subsidiary at
January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended January 29,
2011, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
rue21, inc. and subsidiarys internal control over
financial reporting as of January 29, 2011, based on
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission and our report dated March 29, 2011
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 29, 2011
46
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
50,111
|
|
|
$
|
26,751
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
6,733
|
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
Merchandise inventory, net
|
|
|
96,051
|
|
|
|
72,693
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
10,580
|
|
|
|
6,783
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
5,024
|
|
|
|
4,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
168,499
|
|
|
|
114,347
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
91,371
|
|
|
|
73,147
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
260,791
|
|
|
$
|
188,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
82,075
|
|
|
$
|
59,963
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
15,616
|
|
|
|
14,384
|
|
Accrued payroll and related taxes
|
|
|
12,053
|
|
|
|
10,486
|
|
Deferred rent and tenant allowances, current portion
|
|
|
7,033
|
|
|
|
5,509
|
|
Accrued income and franchise taxes
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
2,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
118,776
|
|
|
|
92,743
|
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred rent, tenant allowances and other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
34,235
|
|
|
|
23,991
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
5,651
|
|
|
|
4,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
39,886
|
|
|
|
28,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
158,662
|
|
|
|
120,983
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock par value $0.001 per share;
200,000 shares authorized; 24,380 shares issued and
outstanding at January 29, 2011; 24,237 shares issued
and outstanding at January 30, 2010
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
31,552
|
|
|
|
27,115
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
70,553
|
|
|
|
40,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
102,129
|
|
|
|
67,448
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
260,791
|
|
|
$
|
188,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
47
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and
|
|
|
|
per share data)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
634,728
|
|
|
$
|
525,600
|
|
|
$
|
391,414
|
|
Cost of goods sold (includes certain buying, occupancy and
distribution center expenses)
|
|
|
399,896
|
|
|
|
337,693
|
|
|
|
257,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
234,832
|
|
|
|
187,907
|
|
|
|
133,561
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense
|
|
|
163,006
|
|
|
|
134,078
|
|
|
|
99,886
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
21,852
|
|
|
|
16,898
|
|
|
|
11,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
49,974
|
|
|
|
36,931
|
|
|
|
22,143
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
49,772
|
|
|
|
36,399
|
|
|
|
20,666
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
19,528
|
|
|
|
14,382
|
|
|
|
8,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
30,244
|
|
|
$
|
22,017
|
|
|
$
|
12,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per common share
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
Diluted income per common share
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding
|
|
|
24,277
|
|
|
|
22,267
|
|
|
|
21,914
|
|
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding
|
|
|
25,002
|
|
|
|
23,037
|
|
|
|
22,814
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
48
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.004 Par Value
|
|
|
$0.001 Par Value
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Balance February 2, 2008
|
|
|
21,869
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
5,653
|
|
|
$
|
5,753
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,639
|
|
|
|
12,639
|
|
Stock issued for stock option exercises
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 31, 2009
|
|
|
22,090
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
18,292
|
|
|
|
18,393
|
|
Conversion of common stock, $0.004 par value to common
stock, $.001 par value
|
|
|
(22,090
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
22,090
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in initial public offering (net of
issuance costs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
26,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,242
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,017
|
|
|
|
22,017
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
Stock issued for stock option exercises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,237
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
27,115
|
|
|
|
40,309
|
|
|
|
67,448
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,244
|
|
|
|
30,244
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,240
|
|
Stock issued for stock option exercises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 29, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
24,379
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
31,552
|
|
|
$
|
70,553
|
|
|
$
|
102,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
49
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
30,244
|
|
|
$
|
22,017
|
|
|
$
|
12,639
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21,852
|
|
|
|
16,994
|
|
|
|
11,624
|
|
Loss on fixed asset disposals
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
2,240
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities
|
|
|
(1,509
|
)
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(2,899
|
)
|
|
|
(1,307
|
)
|
|
|
122
|
|
Merchandise inventory, net
|
|
|
(23,358
|
)
|
|
|
(5,855
|
)
|
|
|
(19,685
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(3,797
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(3,180
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
22,112
|
|
|
|
(486
|
)
|
|
|
24,134
|
|
Accrued payroll and related taxes
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
|
|
2,954
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
3,846
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
Deferred rent and tenant allowances
|
|
|
11,768
|
|
|
|
6,903
|
|
|
|
6,259
|
|
Accrued income and franchise taxes
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
2,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
61,643
|
|
|
|
48,779
|
|
|
|
36,859
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and equipment
|
|
|
(40,480
|
)
|
|
|
(33,630
|
)
|
|
|
(26,464
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
|
|
(40,480
|
)
|
|
|
(33,630
|
)
|
|
|
(26,464
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under revolver
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,381
|
|
|
|
125,371
|
|
Payments under revolver
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117,857
|
)
|
|
|
(110,726
|
)
|
Payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,326
|
)
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based award activities
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from initial public offering, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
|
|
6,991
|
|
|
|
(9,127
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
23,360
|
|
|
|
22,140
|
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
26,751
|
|
|
|
4,611
|
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
50,111
|
|
|
$
|
26,751
|
|
|
$
|
4,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
360
|
|
|
$
|
417
|
|
|
$
|
2,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
18,052
|
|
|
$
|
13,510
|
|
|
$
|
7,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
50
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
For the Year Ended January 29, 2011
(Dollars in thousands, unless otherwise indicated)
Note 1
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Organization
rue21, inc. (the Company or rue21) is a specialty retailer of
junior and young mens apparel and accessories with 638,
535, and 449 stores as of January 29, 2011,
January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009 respectively, in
various strip centers, regional malls and outlet centers
throughout the United States. Sales are generally transacted for
cash, checks and through the acceptance of third-party credit
and debit cards.
On November 13, 2009, the Company completed an initial
public offering of 7,780,252 shares of common stock at a
price to the public of $19.00 per share, of which
1,650,000 shares were sold by the Company, 6,130,252 were
sold by the selling shareholders (including 913,590 by members
of the Companys management). Upon completion of the
offering, the Company received proceeds of approximately
$29,156, net of underwriters discounts and commissions. On
February 26, 2010, the Company completed an offering of
6,961,958 shares of common stock, including
908,081 shares of common stock subsequently sold pursuant
to the underwriters over-allotment option, at a price of
$28.50 per share, all of which were sold by funds advised by
Apax Partners L.P., the Companys principal stockholder and
certain members of the Companys management. The Company
received no proceeds from the offering and incurred
approximately $0.6 million in expense related to the
offering.
In conjunction with the initial public offering of common stock,
the Company was reincorporated in Delaware. The Companys
authorized capital stock consists of 200,000,000 shares of
common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per
share. The consolidated financial statements do not reflect the
reclassification of the common stock, $0.004 par value to
common stock, $0.001 par value, other than the related
adjustment to par value and the increase in the number of
authorized shares.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include all the accounts
of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary r services,
llc. All intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated in consolidation. At January 29, 2011, the
Company operated as one reporting segment.
Fiscal
Year
The Companys fiscal year is 52 or 53 weeks ending on
the Saturday nearest to January 31 of the following year. These
consolidated financial statements were prepared for the
52 weeks ended January 29, 2011, Fiscal Year
2010. As used herein, Fiscal Year 2009 and
Fiscal Year 2008 refer to the 52 week period
ended January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009,
respectively.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These
estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On an
ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates based on
currently available information. Changes in facts and
circumstances may result in revised estimates.
Seasonality
Our business is seasonal and historically we have realized a
higher portion of our net sales, net income and operating cash
flows in the second through the fourth fiscal quarters,
attributable to the impact of the
back-to-school
and holiday selling seasons. As a result, our working capital
requirements fluctuate during the year, increasing in
51
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Notes to
Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
mid-summer in anticipation of the
back-to-school
selling season. Our business is also subject, at certain times,
to calendar shifts which may occur during key selling times such
as school holidays, Easter and regional fluctuations in the
calendar during the
back-to-school
selling season.
Segment
Reporting
The Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) has established
authoritative guidance for reporting information about a
companys operating segments, including disclosures related
to a companys products and services, geographic areas and
major customers. The Company operates in and reports as a single
operating segment which is the operation of its retail stores
which are only located in the United States. The Company has no
international sales. Net sales are generated through the retail
store sale of merchandise to consumers only. All of the
Companys identifiable assets are located in the United
States.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The FASB has established authoritative guidance that requires
management to disclose the estimated fair value of certain
assets and liabilities defined as financial instruments. As of
January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010, management
believes that the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents,
receivables, and payables approximate fair value because of the
short maturity of these financial instruments.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Cash includes cash equivalents, which includes credit and debit
card transactions. Credit and debit card transactions are
typically paid to the Company on the next business day. Amounts
due from credit and debit card transactions totaled $3,323 and
$2,369 on January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010,
respectively. The Company considers all highly liquid
investments purchased with an initial maturity of three months
or less to be cash equivalents.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts receivable generally represent tenant allowances due
from lessors. The Company evaluates collectability and has
determined that no allowance is necessary. As of fiscal year end
2010, receivables consisted of: construction
allowances $5,063, third party sell offs
$928 and other $742. This compares to fiscal year
end 2009 of: construction allowances $3,456 and
other $378.
Merchandise
Inventory
Merchandise inventory is valued at the lower of cost
(first-in,
first-out basis) or market using the retail inventory method.
The Company records merchandise receipts at the time they are
delivered to our consolidator, as we are not directly importing
any merchandise. This is the point at which title and risk of
loss transfer to the Company.
The Company reviews its inventory levels to identify slow-moving
merchandise and generally uses markdowns to clear slow-moving
merchandise. The Company records a markdown reserve based on
estimated future markdowns related to current inventory. Each
period the Company evaluates the selling trends experienced and
the related promotional events or pricing strategies in place to
sell through the current inventory levels. Markdowns may occur
when inventory exceeds customer demand for reasons of style,
seasonal adaptation, changes in customer preference, lack of
consumer acceptance of fashion items, competition, or if it is
determined that the inventory in stock will not sell at its
currently ticketed price. Such markdowns may have an adverse
impact on earnings, depending on the extent and amount of
inventory affected. The anticipated deployment of new seasonal
merchandise is reflected within the estimated future markdowns
reserve utilized in valuing current inventory, as such
52
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Notes to
Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
new inventory in certain circumstances will displace merchandise
units currently on-hand. The markdown reserve is recorded as an
increase to cost of goods sold in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Income.
The Company also estimates a shrinkage reserve for the period of
time between the last physical count and the balance sheet date.
The estimate for shrinkage reserve can be affected by changes in
merchandise mix and changes in actual shrinkage trends.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded on the basis of cost with
depreciation and amortization computed utilizing the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives as follows:
|
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
7 years
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Lesser of 10 years or lease term
|
Automobiles
|
|
5 years
|
Computer equipment and software
|
|
3 to 5 years
|
In accordance with the FASBs authoritative guidance
related to the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets,
impairment losses may be recorded on long-lived assets used in
operations when events and circumstances indicate that the
assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows
estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the
carrying amounts of those assets. If such a condition occurs,
the assets are adjusted to their estimated fair value.
Impairment charges of $221, $273 and $219 were recognized for
the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30,
2010, January 31, 2009, respectively, for assets related to
stores to be converted and are recorded in selling, general, and
administrative expense in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Income.
Deferred
Rent and Tenant Allowances
Deferred rent is recognized when a lease contains a
predetermined fixed escalation of minimum rent. The Company
recognizes the related rent expense on a straight-line basis
from possession date and records the difference between the
recognized rental expense and the amounts payable under the
lease as deferred rent liability. Also included in deferred rent
are tenant allowances received from landlords in accordance with
negotiated lease terms. The tenant allowances are amortized as a
reduction to rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term
of the lease (including the pre-opening build-out period). The
short-term portion of deferred rent is recorded in accrued
expenses and other current liabilities and the long-term portion
is included in deferred rent, tenant allowances and other
long-term liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
Insurance
and Self-Insurance
The Company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance
for a number of risk management activities including
workers compensation, general liability, automobile
liability, and employee-related health care benefits, a portion
of which is paid by the employees. Costs related to claims are
accrued based on known claims and historical experiences of
incurred but not reported claims received from our insurers. The
Company believes that it has adequately reserved for its
self-insurance liability, which is capped through the use of
stop-loss contracts and specified retentions with insurance
companies. However, any significant variation of future claims
from historical trends could cause actual results to differ from
the accrued liability.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue is recognized upon purchase of merchandise by customers.
Allowances for sales returns are recorded as a reduction of net
sales in the periods in which the sales are recognized.
Consistent with our merchandise return policy of 30 days,
the allowance for sales returns at each period end is calculated
and recorded based upon an
53
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Notes to
Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
estimate of expected returns over a subsequent
30-day
period. The allowance for sales returns was $413 and $349 for
the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011 and
January 30, 2010, respectively. Sales tax collected from
customers is excluded from revenue and is included as part of
accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Deferred revenue is established upon the purchase of gift cards
by customers, and revenue is recognized upon redemption of gift
cards for merchandise. The Company evaluated unredeemed gift
cards and determined that the likelihood of certain gift cards
being redeemed by the customer after 18 months was remote,
based upon historical redemption patterns of gift cards. We have
established a wholly-owned subsidiary to administer the gift
card program within a state jurisdiction that does not require
remittance of unclaimed property. For those gift cards that were
determined redemption would be remote, the Company reversed the
liability, and recorded gift card breakage income. Gift card
breakage income of $328, $224 and $535 was recognized for the
fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010
and January 31, 2009, respectively. The amount recognized
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 represented the
initial recognition and includes income related to gift cards
sold since the inception of the gift card program. Gift card
breakage income is recorded as reduction to cost of goods sold.
Cost of
Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold includes costs related to merchandise sold,
distribution and warehousing, freight from the distribution
center to the stores, store occupancy, and buying and
merchandising department expenses. Cost of goods sold is reduced
by certain vendor allowances received, primarily for markdowns,
merchandise marked out of stock and vendor non-compliance
charges.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense includes
administration, share-based compensation and store expenses but
excludes store occupancy costs and freight to stores.
Income
Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the
authoritative guidance issued by the FASB, which requires the
use of the asset and liability method. Under this method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the
difference between the carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using the tax rates, based on
certain judgments regarding enacted tax laws and published
guidance, in effect in the years when those temporary
differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is
established against the deferred tax assets when it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred taxes
may not be realized. Changes in the level and composition of
earnings, tax laws or the deferred tax valuation allowance, as
well as the results of tax audits may materially impact the
effective tax rate.
The Company recognizes income tax liabilities related to
unrecognized tax benefits in accordance with the FASBs
authoritative guidance related to uncertain tax positions and
adjust these liabilities when our judgment changes as the result
of the evaluation of new information. The Company classifies
interest and penalties as an element of tax expense.
The calculation of the deferred tax assets and liabilities, as
well as the decision to recognize a tax benefit from an
uncertain position and to establish a valuation allowance
require management to make estimates and assumptions. The
Company believes that its assumptions and estimates are
reasonable, although actual results may have a positive or
negative material impact on the balances of deferred tax assets
and liabilities, valuation allowances, or net income.
54
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Notes to
Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
Stock
Based Compensation
The Company accounts for share based compensation awards in
accordance with the FASBs authoritative guidance, which
requires companies recognize all share based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options, in the
consolidated financial statements based on the grant date fair
value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The Company
recognizes compensation expense for stock option awards on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the
award. The Company has historically issued new shares of common
stock upon the exercise of employee stock options.
Prior to the Companys initial public offering on
November 13, 2009, all stock-based awards granted to
employees had been incentive stock options (ISOs). The recipient
of an ISO must hold the underlying shares for at least two years
from the date of grant and one year from the date of exercise in
order to receive favorable capital gains tax
treatment on any profit realized from the sale of those shares.
If this holding period is not met, a disqualifying
disposition has occurred and all or a portion of the
profit realized by the individual is taxed at ordinary income
tax rates. If the Company includes this profit in an
individuals taxable compensation, then it can deduct it as
compensation expense on its corporate tax return. These benefits
are generally recorded as a reduction to income taxes payable.
Under the FASBs authoritative guidance, the Company
accounts for any disqualifying dispositions under the individual
award method.
Store
Preopening Costs
Store preopening costs, which consist primarily of occupancy
costs and payroll, are expensed as incurred and are included in
selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Income.
Advertising
Costs
The Company expenses advertising costs when incurred.
Advertising expense, which is classified in selling, general,
and administrative expense in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Income, was $3,936, $3,000 and $2,381 for the
fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010
and January 31, 2009, respectively.
Repairs
and Maintenance
The Company capitalizes costs that extend the life of an asset
and that meet certain minimal dollar thresholds depending on
asset category. All other costs including maintenance agreements
are charged to selling, general and administrative expense in
the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. Repairs and
maintenance expense was $1,797, $1,464 and $1,204 for the fiscal
years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and
January 31, 2009, respectively. Repairs and maintenance
expense does not include any costs for store conversions.
Legal
Proceedings and Claims
The Company is subject to certain legal proceedings and claims
arising out of the conduct of its business. In accordance with
the FASBs authoritative guidance for contingent losses
management records a reserve for estimated losses when the loss
is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If a
range of possible loss exists and no anticipated loss within the
range is more likely than any other anticipated loss, the
Company records the accrual at the low end of the range. As the
Company believes that it has provided adequate reserves, it
anticipates that the ultimate outcome of any matter currently
pending against the Company will not materially affect the
consolidated financial position or results of operations of the
Company.
Earnings
per Share
Basic earnings per common share amounts are calculated using the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted earnings per common share amounts are calculated
using the weighted
55
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Notes to
Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
average number of common shares outstanding plus the additional
dilution for all potentially dilutive stock options utilizing
the treasury stock method.
The following table shows the amounts used in computing earnings
per share and the effect on net income and the weighted average
number of shares of potential dilutive common stock (stock
options):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
30,244
|
|
|
$
|
22,017
|
|
|
$
|
12,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding
|
|
|
24,277
|
|
|
|
22,267
|
|
|
|
21,914
|
|
Impact of dilutive securities
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding
|
|
|
25,002
|
|
|
|
23,037
|
|
|
|
22,814
|
|
Per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per common share
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
0.58
|
|
Diluted income per common share
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
Equity awards to purchase 340, 400 and 314 shares of common
stock for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011,
January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively,
were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of
weighted average diluted common share amounts as the effect of
doing so would have been anti-dilutive.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued authoritative guidance in connection with adding
qualified special purpose entities into the scope of guidance
for consolidation of variable interest entities. This literature
also modifies the analysis by which a controlling interest of a
variable interest entity is determined thereby requiring the
controlling interest to consolidate the variable interest
entity. A controlling interest exists if a party to a variable
interest entity has both (i) the power to direct the
activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly
impact the entitys economic performance and (ii) the
obligation to absorb losses of or receive benefits from the
entity that could be potentially significant to the variable
interest entity. The guidance is effective as of the beginning
of the first annual reporting period beginning after
November 15, 2009 and will be applied prospectively for
interim and annual periods upon adoption. The Company has
adopted the guidance without any impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
2010-06,
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements
(ASU
2010-6). ASU
2010-6
amends the FASBs authoritative guidance related to fair
value measurements and disclosures to require additional
disclosures related to transfers between levels in the hierarchy
of fair value measurements. ASU
2010-6 is
effective for interim and annual fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2009. The standard does not change how fair
values are measured. The Company has adopted the guidance
without any impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
2010-09,
Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure
Requirements. ASU
2010-09
relates to the accounting for and disclosure of events that
occur after the balance sheet date but before financial
statements are issued or available to be issued, otherwise known
as subsequent events. Specifically, these changes
clarify that an entity that is required to file or furnish its
financial statements with the SEC is not required to disclose
that date through which subsequent events have been evaluated.
Management has evaluated all subsequent events through the date
the consolidated financial statements were issued. No material
recognized or non-recognized subsequent events were identified.
56
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Notes to
Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
The FASB issues ASUs to amend the authoritative literature in
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC). There have been a
number of ASUs to date that amend the original text of ASC.
Except for ASU
2010-09
listed above, those issued to date either (i) provide
supplemental guidance, (ii) are technical corrections,
(iii) are not applicable to the Company or (iv) are
not expected to have a significant impact on the Company.
Note 2
Fair Value Measurements
The FASBs authoritative guidelines require the
categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based
upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets or
liabilities. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of
fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant
management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets and liabilities. The
Companys cash and cash equivalents of $50,111 and $26,751
as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010,
respectively, are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1
inputs.
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Observable inputs other than
those included in Level 1. For example, quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices
for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting
managements own assumptions about the inputs used in
pricing the asset or liability. The Company determined that the
fair value measurements related to the impaired long lived
assets disclosed in Note 1 are derived from significant
unobservable inputs. These non-financial assets are measured on
a non-recurring basis when events and circumstances warrant.
|
In accordance with ASC 820, the following tables represent
the fair value hierarchy for the Companys financial assets
(cash equivalents) measured at fair value on a recurring basis
as of January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at January 29, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in Active
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Cash and cash Equivalents
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
(level 3)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
50,111
|
|
|
$
|
50,111
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
50,111
|
|
|
$
|
50,111
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at January 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in Active
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Cash and cash Equivalents
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Inputs (Level 2)
|
|
|
(level 3)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
26,751
|
|
|
$
|
26,751
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
26,751
|
|
|
$
|
26,751
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Notes to
Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
Note 3
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
$
|
73,635
|
|
|
$
|
58,518
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
75,445
|
|
|
|
54,715
|
|
Computer equipment, software and other
|
|
|
18,044
|
|
|
|
15,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,124
|
|
|
|
129,170
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(75,753
|
)
|
|
|
(56,023
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
91,371
|
|
|
$
|
73,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense was $21,852, $16,898, and
$11,532 for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011,
January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively.
Note 4
Long-Term Debt
Effective April 10, 2008, the Company established a
five-year $60,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (the
Senior Secured Credit Facility) with Bank of America N.A. The
ceiling is expandable at the Companys option in increments
of $5,000 up to a limit of $85,000 under certain defined
conditions. The Senior Secured Credit Facility initial borrowing
was $27,217. Proceeds from the initial borrowing were used for
the extinguishment of all of the Companys existing
long-term debt facilities and the Bank of America N.A.
commitment fee. Availability under the Senior Secured Credit
Facility is collateralized by a first priority interest in all
the Companys assets. On November 24, 2009, the
Company amended its Senior Secured Credit Facility with Bank of
America, N.A. An amendment fee of $125 was paid on the effective
date of the amendment. Key provisions of the amendment include
an increase in the borrowing ceiling to $85,000 from $60,000,
which is further expandable at the Companys option in
increments of $5,000 up to a limit of $100,000 under certain
defined conditions. Interest accrues at the higher of the
Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%, the prime rate or the adjusted
LIBOR rate plus the applicable margin which ranges from 1.25% to
3.00% set quarterly dependent upon average net availability on
the facility during the previous quarter. The weighted-average
interest rate under the Senior Secured Credit Facility was 0.00%
and 2.75% for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011 and
January 30, 2010, respectively. The Senior Secured Credit
Facility includes a fixed charge covenant applicable only if net
availability falls below thresholds of 10%. The Company is in
compliance with all covenants under the Senior Secured Credit
Facility at January 29, 2011. The Senior Secured Credit
Facility matures in April 2013. As of January 29, 2011 and
January 30, 2010, $0 was outstanding under the Senior
Secured Credit Facility.
Note 5
Stock-Based Compensation
In November 2009, the Company adopted the 2009 Omnibus Incentive
Plan (the 2009 Plan) in connection with the Companys
initial public offering, pursuant to which key employees,
officers, and directors shall be eligible to receive grants of
stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock or
restricted stock units to purchase or receive, as applicable, up
to an aggregate of 3,626,000 shares of common stock based
on eligibility, vesting, and performance standards established
by the board of directors. Stock options granted are generally
exercisable ratably over 3 or 4 years, subject to certain
employment terms and conditions. The stock options generally
expire ten years from the date of issuance. To date, 478,878
stock options have been granted, 24,598 restricted stock units
have been granted and no stock appreciation rights or restricted
stock have been issued under the 2009 Plan.
Effective May 15, 2003, the Company adopted the 2003
Ownership Incentive Plan (the 2003 Plan) pursuant to which key
employees, officers, and directors were eligible to receive
options to purchase common stock for an
58
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Notes to
Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
aggregate of up to 19.8% of the number of shares of the common
stock outstanding upon adoption of the 2003 Plan based on
eligibility, vesting, and performance standards established by
the board of directors. Upon adopting the 2009 Plan, the Company
discontinued use of the 2003 Plan and no further option grants
will be made under the 2003 Plan.
Stock
Option Activity
The following table represents stock options granted, vested,
and expired under the existing share based compensation plans
for fiscal year ended January 29, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(Per share)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding January 30, 2010
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
$
|
7.84
|
|
|
|
8.13
|
|
|
$
|
23,615
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
$
|
32.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired or forfeited
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
16.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding January 29, 2011
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
$
|
15.63
|
|
|
|
7.83
|
|
|
$
|
21,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested at January 29,2011
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
$
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
6.48
|
|
|
$
|
13,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 29, 2011, the Company had
3,122,524 shares available for stock grants. The Company
recognized $2,240, $410 and $0 in compensation expense related
to stock options for the fiscal years ended January 29,
2011, January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009,
respectively. The weighted-average fair value of stock options
at the grant date was $17.37, $6.92 and $0.43 for the fiscal
years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and
January 31, 2009, respectively. The intrinsic value of
options exercised was $3,777, $13,834 and $617 for the fiscal
years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and
January 31, 2009, respectively. All outstanding vested
options are currently exercisable as of January 29, 2011.
The fair value of stock options was estimated at the date of
grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following range of weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate(1)
|
|
|
1.52%-2.46%
|
|
|
|
2.6%-3.3%
|
|
|
|
4.7%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility factors for the expected market price of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys common stock(2)
|
|
|
55.0%
|
|
|
|
53.0%-60.0%
|
|
|
|
55.0%
|
|
Weighted average expected term(3)
|
|
|
6.3 years
|
|
|
|
6.3 years
|
|
|
|
6.3 years
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant with a term consistent with the expected life of stock
options. |
|
(2) |
|
Expected stock price volatility is based on comparable
volatilities of peer companies within rue21s industry. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the period of time options are expected to be
outstanding. The weighted-average expected option term was
determined using the simplified method, as allowed
by Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 14. The expected term
used to value a share option grant under the simplified method
is the midpoint between the vesting date and the contractual
term of the share option. |
59
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Notes to
Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
The following table summarizes information regarding non-vested
outstanding stock options as of January 29, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Averaged Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
at Grant Date
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(Per share)
|
|
|
Non-vested as of January 30, 2010
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
$
|
4.70
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
$
|
17.37
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.76
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
9.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested as of January 29, 2011
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
$
|
11.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 29, 2011, there was $9,670 of unrecognized
compensation expense related to nonvested stock option awards
that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 1.96 years. The total fair value of shares vested during
the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30,
2010 and January 31, 2009, was $835, $5,312 and $851,
respectively.
Restricted
Stock Activity
Below is a summary of restricted stock unit activity for the
fifty-two weeks ended January 29, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(Per share)
|
|
|
Non-vested at January 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
30.49
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at January 29, 2011
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
30.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of restricted stock units granted during
the fifty-two week period ended January 29, 2011, was
$0.8 million. As of January 29, 2011, there was
$0.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested restricted stock units. The unrecognized
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 1.9 years.
Note 6
Lease Commitments
All of the Companys operations are conducted from leased
premises. Store leases provide for base rentals, some of which
increase over time, and the payment of a percentage of sales as
additional rent when sales exceed specified levels. Minimum
rentals relating to these leases are recorded on a straight-line
basis. Generally, lease terms are five to ten years in length
excluding renewal options. In addition, the Company is typically
responsible under its leases for maintenance, common area
charges, real estate taxes, and certain other expenses. Point of
sale equipment is also leased by the Company in terms of four
years. All leases are classified as operating leases.
60
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Notes to
Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
A summary of fixed minimum and contingent rent expense for all
operating leases follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Store Rent:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed minimum
|
|
$
|
44,276
|
|
|
$
|
35,665
|
|
|
$
|
28,057
|
|
Contingent
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total store rent, excluding common maintenance charges,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
real estate taxes and certain other expenses
|
|
|
46,976
|
|
|
|
38,090
|
|
|
|
29,096
|
|
Offices, distribution facilities and equipment
|
|
|
3,320
|
|
|
|
3,165
|
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Rent Expense
|
|
$
|
50,296
|
|
|
$
|
41,255
|
|
|
$
|
32,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company leases an approximately 190,000 square foot
distribution and office facility, which is accounted for as an
operating lease. The lease agreement expires in fiscal year 2012
with options to renew for an additional five-year term. Our
principal executive office, approximating 60,633 square
feet, is also under an operating lease agreement. This lease
agreement expires in fiscal year 2017 with an option to renew
for an additional five-year term.
The table below summarizes future annual minimum lease
obligations under all operating leases as required by the lease
agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
51,342
|
|
2012
|
|
|
47,595
|
|
2013
|
|
|
41,818
|
|
2014
|
|
|
34,813
|
|
2015
|
|
|
28,800
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
87,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total future lease obligations
|
|
$
|
291,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7
401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
The Company sponsors a qualified 401(k) plan with a contributory
profit-sharing feature (the Plan) for eligible employees.
Effective January 1, 2010, the Plan was amended to permit
participants of the Plan to contribute up to 50% of pretax
annual compensation as defined in the Plan, subject to certain
limitations. Also, effective January 1, 2010, the Company
will match 100% of participant contributions up to 4% of pretax
annual compensation as defined in the Plan. Prior to this
amendment, participants of the Plan could contribute up to 15%
of pretax annual compensation as defined in the Plan, subject to
certain limitations and the Company matched 25% of the first 6%
of base compensation that a participant contributes to the Plan.
Profit-sharing contributions to the Plan, as
determined by the Board of Directors, are discretionary, but
generally may not exceed 15% of defined annual compensation paid
to all participating employees. 401(k) matching contributions
and profit-sharing contributions to the Plan were $579, $184 and
$119 for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011,
January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively,
and are included in selling, general, and administrative expense
in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
61
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Notes to
Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
Note 8
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes at the fiscal years ended
January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and
January 31, 2009 consists of the current and deferred
elements in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
15,834
|
|
|
$
|
10,943
|
|
|
$
|
4,693
|
|
State
|
|
|
3,030
|
|
|
|
2,281
|
|
|
|
1,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
18,864
|
|
|
|
13,224
|
|
|
|
6,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
State
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
19,528
|
|
|
$
|
14,382
|
|
|
$
|
8,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys income taxes determined at the statutory rate
for the fiscal years ended January 29, 2011,
January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009 differ from the
actual rate as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Effective Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State taxes
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
Non-deductible expenses
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.3
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
39.2
|
%
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
|
|
38.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Notes to
Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
As a result of temporary differences, the Company has the
following net deferred tax amounts at January 29, 2011,
January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fin 48 temporary differences
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
Deferred Rent
|
|
|
15,925
|
|
|
|
11,371
|
|
|
|
8,618
|
|
Accrued Compensation
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
Accrued Reserve
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
18,961
|
|
|
|
13,475
|
|
|
|
10,241
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets
|
|
|
(19,588
|
)
|
|
|
(13,438
|
)
|
|
|
(9,046
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax (liability) asset
|
|
$
|
(627
|
)
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current-deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
5,024
|
|
|
$
|
4,286
|
|
|
$
|
3,135
|
|
Noncurrent-deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(5,651
|
)
|
|
|
(4,249
|
)
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(627
|
)
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the activity related to our
unrecognized tax benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
Gross balance as of February 2, 2008
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
Prior period tax positions (decrease)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross balance as of January 31, 2009
|
|
|
146
|
|
Prior period tax positions (decrease)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross balance as of January 30, 2010
|
|
|
35
|
|
Prior period tax positions (decrease)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross balance as of January 29, 2011
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
The gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits at
January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010 and
January 31, 2009 was $34, $35 and $146, respectively, of
which $0 would affect the effective tax rate if recognized. Over
the next 12 months the company believes that there will be
no material change in unrecognized tax benefits.
The Company classifies interest and penalties as an element of
tax expense. The amount of tax related interest and penalties
for fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30,
2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively, was not material.
The Company files a consolidated U.S. Federal Tax returns
as well as various state tax returns. The Companys
U.S. Federal tax returns are open for further audit by
taxing authorities for the periods of 2006 through 2010. The
principal state jurisdictions that remain open to examination
for the periods 2005 and forward are: Pennsylvania, Texas, North
Carolina, Illinois, and West Virginia.
63
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Notes to
Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
Note 9
Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation
relating to claims arising out of the normal course of business.
As of the date hereof, the Company is involved in no litigation
that the Company believes will have a material adverse effect on
its consolidated financial condition, results of operation, or
liquidity.
Note 10
Related Party Transactions
In May 2003, the Company entered into a letter agreement with
Apax Partners, L.P. (Apax) as successor to Saunders
Karp & Megrue, LLC, relating to financial advisory
services to be provided to the Company from time to time. Under
the letter agreement, the Company agreed to pay an annual fee of
$250 to Apax and to reimburse Apax for all reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with the letter agreement. In
addition, the letter agreement provided for customary
indemnification provisions and terminates once Apax and its
affiliates beneficially own, collectively, less than 25% of the
Companys voting common stock. In November 2009, the letter
agreement with Apax was terminated and Apax received a
termination fee of $1,500, which was recorded as a component of
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements on income. We also reimburse Apax for
reasonable expenses incurred to attend board of director
meetings. Amounts paid to Apax totaled $35, $1,696 and $250 for
fiscal years ended January 29, 2011, January 30, 2010
and January 31, 2009, respectively.
At January 29, 2011, funds advised by Apax owned
approximately 29% of the Companys outstanding common stock.
Note 11
Selected Quarterly Financial Data
(Unaudited)
The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly
financial information (in thousands, except share and per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended
|
|
|
May 1,
|
|
July 31,
|
|
October 30,
|
|
January 29,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
Fiscal Year 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
137,772
|
|
|
$
|
142,950
|
|
|
$
|
163,913
|
|
|
$
|
190,093
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
52,231
|
|
|
|
54,544
|
|
|
|
60,053
|
|
|
|
68,003
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
5,821
|
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
|
|
7,143
|
|
|
|
10,889
|
|
Basic income per common share
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
Diluted income per common share
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding
|
|
|
24,248
|
|
|
|
24,277
|
|
|
|
24,310
|
|
|
|
24,335
|
|
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding
|
|
|
25,044
|
|
|
|
25,044
|
|
|
|
24,972
|
|
|
|
25,029
|
|
64
rue21,
inc. and subsidiary
Notes to
Consolidated
Financial Statements (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
August 1,
|
|
October 31,
|
|
January 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
107,998
|
|
|
$
|
125,106
|
|
|
$
|
137,110
|
|
|
$
|
155,386
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
37,918
|
|
|
|
44,992
|
|
|
|
49,571
|
|
|
|
55,426
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,989
|
|
|
|
5,328
|
|
|
|
5,978
|
|
|
|
7,722
|
|
Basic income per common share
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
Diluted income per common share
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding
|
|
|
22,090
|
|
|
|
22,090
|
|
|
|
22,201
|
|
|
|
23,530
|
|
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding
|
|
|
23,006
|
|
|
|
23,008
|
|
|
|
23,058
|
|
|
|
24,281
|
|
65
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management has evaluated, under the supervision and with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in
Rule 13(a)-15(e),
as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
pursuant to
Rule 13a-15(b)
under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are effective in ensuring that information required to be
disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is (1) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner and
(2) accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined
in
Rules 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act.. Our internal control over financial
reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
to our management and board of directors regarding the
reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation and
fair presentation of published financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2011. In
making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) in Internal Control Integrated
Framework. Based on that assessment, our management
concluded that, as of January 29, 2011, our internal
control over financial reporting is effective based on those
criteria.
The Companys independent registered public accounting firm
that audited the consolidated financial statements included in
this Annual Report issued an attestation report on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Companys
fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010 that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
66
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of rue21, inc. and
subsidiary
We have audited rue21, inc. and subsidiarys internal
control over financial reporting as of January 29, 2011,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
rue21, inc. and subsidiarys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting,
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, rue21, inc. and subsidiary
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of January 29, 2011, based on
the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of rue21, inc. and subsidiary as of
January 29, 2011 and January 30, 2010 and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
January 29, 2011 of rue21, inc. and subsidiary and our
report dated March 29, 2011 expressed an unqualified
opinion thereon.
Pittsburgh, PA
March 29, 2011
67
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
Part III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the sections entitled
Proposal No. 1-Election
of Directors, Information Concerning Our Board of
Directors Audit Committee, Information
Concerning Executive Officers, Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance and
Information Concerning Our Board of Directors
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics in the 2011 Proxy
Statement.
The Code applies to all employees including our principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, controller and
persons performing similar functions. The Code is available on
our website, www.rue21.com, under Investor Relations,
Corporate Governance and in print to any person who
requests it. Any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of
our Code that applies to our principal executive officer,
principal financial officer or persons performing similar
functions and that relates to any element of the Code enumerated
in paragraph (b) of Item 406 of
Regulation S-K
shall be disclosed by posting such information on our website.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the sections entitled Information Concerning
our Board of Directors Director Compensation
and Understanding Our Director Compensation Table,
Executive Compensation Information Concerning
our Board of Directors Compensation
Committee Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation and Compensation Committee
Report in the 2011 Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the sections entitled Stock Ownership
and Equity Compensation Plan Information in the 2011
Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the sections Certain Relationships and
Transactions with Related Persons, Information
Concerning our Board of Directors Compensation
Committee Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation and Director
Independence in the 2011 Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the section entitled
Proposal 4 Ratification of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm For Fiscal Year
2011 Audit and Non-Audit Fees and Independent Public
Accountants in the 2011 Proxy Statement.
Part IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this
Form 10-K:
1. Financial Statements: See
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements in
Part II, Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for a list of the Financial Statements required to be filed
herewith.
2. Financial Statement Schedule: All
Schedules are omitted because they are not required or because
the information is immaterial or provided elsewhere in the
Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
3. Exhibits: See Exhibit Index
following the signature page of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
68
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
rue21, inc.
Name: Robert N. Fisch
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Date: March 29, 2011
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Keith
A. McDonough
|
Name: Keith A. McDonough
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Date: March 29, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
N. Fisch
Robert
N. Fisch
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (principal
executive officer)
|
|
March 29, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Keith
A. McDonough
Keith
A. McDonough
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer and principal accounting officer)
|
|
March 29, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Arnold
S. Barron
Arnold
S. Barron
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Macon
F. Brock Jr.
Macon
F. Brock Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Douglas
E. Coltharp
Douglas
E. Coltharp
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bruce
A. Hartman
Bruce
A. Hartman
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
F. Megrue, Jr.
John
F. Megrue, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alex
S. Pellegrini
Alex
S. Pellegrini
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2011
|
69
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Registrants Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the Registrants Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(SEC File
No. 333-164401)
filed on February 19, 2010.
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Registrants Amended and Restated By-laws, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(SEC File
No. 333-164401)
filed on February 19, 2010.
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-161850)
filed on November 10, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2008, by and
between Robert Fisch and rue21, inc., incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-161850)
filed on September 10, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of
December 17, 2010, by and between Robert Fisch and rue 21,
inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Registrants
Form 8-K
filed on December 21, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
rue21, inc. Second Amended and Restated 2003 Ownership Incentive
Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the
Registrants Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(SEC File
No. 333-164401)
filed on February 19, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
rue21, inc. 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrants
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(SEC File
No. 333-164401)
filed on February 19, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated April 10, 2008, among rue21, inc.,
as lead borrower, the borrowers named therein, r services llc,
as guarantor and Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent,
collateral agent, swing line lender and letter of credit issuer,
and the other lender parties thereto, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrants
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-161850)
filed on October 13, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Security Agreement, dated April 10, 2008, by and among
rue21, inc., as lead borrower, r services llc, as guarantor, and
Bank of America, N.A., as collateral agent, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registrants
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-161850)
filed on September 10, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Guaranty, dated April 10, 2008, by r services llc, as
guarantor, in favor of Bank of America, N.A., as administrative
agent and collateral agent, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 to Registrants
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-161850)
filed on September 10, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement by and among rue21, inc., as
the Lead Borrower, r services llc, as Guarantor, and Bank of
America, N.A., as Lender, Administrative Agent, Collateral
Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer, dated
November 24, 2009, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on December 1, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
First Amendment to Security Agreement by and among rue21, inc.,
as the Lead Borrower, r services llc, as Guarantor, and Bank of
America, N.A. as Collateral Agent, dated November 24, 2009,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on December 1, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
First Amendment to Intellectual Property Security Agreement by
and among rue21, inc., as the Lead Borrower, r services llc, as
Guarantor, and Bank of America, N.A. as Collateral Agent, dated
November 24, 2009, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 of the Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on December 1, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated June 28, 1999, by and between West
Virginia Economic Development Authority, as landlord, and
Pennsylvania Fashions, Inc., as tenant, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Registrants
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-161850)
filed on September 10, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
First Amendment to Lease, dated April 1, 2002, by and
between West Virginia Economic Development Authority, as
landlord, and Pennsylvania Fashions, Inc., as tenant,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8.1 to
Registrants
Form S-1
(File
No. 333-161850)
filed on October 13, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease, dated June 11, 2010, by and
between West Virginia Economic Development Authority and rue21,
inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Registrants
Form 10-Q
filed on September 3, 2010.
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for Directors, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Registrants
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-161850)
filed on November 9, 2009.
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for Officers, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Registrants
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-161850)
filed on November 9, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Registrants
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-161850)
filed on November 2, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Registrants
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-161850)
filed on November 2, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Registrants
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-161850)
filed on November 2, 2009.
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.16 to Registrants
Form S-1/A
(File
No. 333-161850)
filed on November 2, 2009.
|
|
21
|
.1*
|
|
List of subsidiaries of rue21, inc.
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm.
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of rue21 inc.
(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of rue21 inc.
(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).
|
|
32
|
.1*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of rue21 inc.
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2*
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of rue21 inc.
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
71