e10vq
United States
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-35021
EVANS BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
|
|
16-1332767 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
14 -16 North Main Street, Angola, New York |
|
14006 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(716) 926-2000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date:
Common Stock, $.50 par value: 4,100,319 shares as of April 22, 2011
INDEX
EVANS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EVANS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2011 AND DECEMBER 31, 2010
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
13,553 |
|
|
$ |
13,467 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
17,567 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale, at fair value (cost: $93,940 at March 31, 2011;
$86,096 at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
95,468 |
|
|
|
87,422 |
|
Held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value: $2,221 at March 31, 2011;
$2,130 at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
2,235 |
|
|
|
2,140 |
|
FHLB and FRB common stock, at amortized cost and fair value |
|
|
3,165 |
|
|
|
3,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $10,482
in 2011 and $10,424 in 2010 |
|
|
521,147 |
|
|
|
517,554 |
|
Properties and equipment, net of depreciation of $12,368 in 2011
and $12,054 in 2010 |
|
|
10,609 |
|
|
|
10,841 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
8,101 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
12,493 |
|
|
|
12,389 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
14,335 |
|
|
|
14,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
699,711 |
|
|
$ |
671,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand |
|
$ |
99,444 |
|
|
$ |
98,016 |
|
NOW |
|
|
43,457 |
|
|
|
32,683 |
|
Regular savings |
|
|
263,854 |
|
|
|
249,410 |
|
Muni-vest |
|
|
34,804 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
Time |
|
|
143,588 |
|
|
|
142,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
585,147 |
|
|
|
544,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase |
|
|
4,807 |
|
|
|
5,227 |
|
Other short-term borrowings |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
13,669 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
12,055 |
|
|
|
11,776 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
11,330 |
|
|
|
11,330 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
635,378 |
|
|
|
608,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND COMMITMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.50 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized;
4,094,147 and 4,081,960 shares issued and outstanding, respectively, |
|
|
2,047 |
|
|
|
2,041 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
40,720 |
|
|
|
40,660 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
21,895 |
|
|
|
20,836 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
64,333 |
|
|
|
63,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
699,711 |
|
|
$ |
671,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EVANS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases |
|
$ |
7,152 |
|
|
$ |
6,941 |
|
Interest bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
Non-taxable |
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
8,013 |
|
|
|
7,746 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
NET INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
6,297 |
|
|
|
6,078 |
|
PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES |
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES |
|
|
5,809 |
|
|
|
4,864 |
|
NON-INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank charges |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
Insurance service and fees |
|
|
2,089 |
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
Data center income |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
Net gain (loss) on sales and calls of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Gain on loans sold |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Other |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
3,461 |
|
|
|
3,702 |
|
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
3,608 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
Repairs and maintenance |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
Advertising and public relations |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
Technology and communications |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
Other |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
6,605 |
|
|
|
6,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
2,665 |
|
|
|
2,115 |
|
INCOME TAX PROVISION |
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
1,875 |
|
|
$ |
1,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share-basic |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share-diluted |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
4,085,509 |
|
|
|
2,818,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
4,096,170 |
|
|
|
2,823,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EVANS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Surplus |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
(Loss) Income |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,407 |
|
|
$ |
27,279 |
|
|
$ |
17,381 |
|
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
$ |
45,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale, net of
reclassification of loss of ($4) (after tax) securities, net
of tax effect of ($8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost and net loss net
of tax effect of ($13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends ($0.20 per common share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued 14,620 restricted shares |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,414 |
|
|
$ |
27,321 |
|
|
$ |
18,263 |
|
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
|
$ |
46,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2011 |
|
$ |
2,041 |
|
|
$ |
40,660 |
|
|
$ |
20,836 |
|
|
$ |
(473 |
) |
|
$ |
63,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities,
net of tax effect of ($78) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost and net loss net
of tax effect of ($11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends ($0.20 per common share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued 12,260 restricted shares |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
2,047 |
|
|
$ |
40,720 |
|
|
$ |
21,895 |
|
|
$ |
(329 |
) |
|
$ |
64,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
3
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EVANS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received |
|
$ |
7,654 |
|
|
$ |
7,679 |
|
Fees received |
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
3,765 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
(1,829 |
) |
|
|
(1,805 |
) |
Cash paid to employees and vendors |
|
|
(5,985 |
) |
|
|
(5,079 |
) |
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans held for resale |
|
|
7,285 |
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
Originations of loans held for resale |
|
|
(9,779 |
) |
|
|
(2,817 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
2,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sales securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(10,029 |
) |
|
|
(38,305 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities and calls |
|
|
2,655 |
|
|
|
29,254 |
|
Held to maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and calls |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to properties and equipment |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
Increase in loans, net of repayments |
|
|
(2,327 |
) |
|
|
(9,725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(9,879 |
) |
|
|
(18,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,795 |
|
Repayments of borrowings |
|
|
(14,050 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
40,690 |
|
|
|
11,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
26,640 |
|
|
|
14,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents |
|
|
17,398 |
|
|
|
(2,204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
13,722 |
|
|
|
12,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
31,120 |
|
|
$ |
10,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (continued) |
4
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME TO NET CASH
PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,875 |
|
|
$ |
1,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
Net gain on sales of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Premium on loans sold |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Stock options expense |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Proceeds from sale of loans held for resale |
|
|
7,285 |
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
Originations of loans held for resale |
|
|
(9,779 |
) |
|
|
(2,817 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities affecting cash flow: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
(490 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(1,163 |
) |
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
$ |
637 |
|
|
$ |
2,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
5
PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1-FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
EVANS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010
1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies followed by Evans Bancorp, Inc. (the Company), a financial
holding company, and its two direct, wholly-owned subsidiaries: (i) Evans Bank, National
Association (the Bank), and the Banks subsidiaries, Evans National Leasing, Inc. (ENL), Evans
National Holding Corp. (ENHC) and Suchak Data Systems, Inc. (SDS); and (ii) Evans National
Financial Services, Inc. (ENFS), and ENFSs subsidiary, The Evans Agency, Inc. (TEA) and TEAs
subsidiaries, Frontier Claims Services, Inc. (FCS) and ENB Associates Inc. (ENBA), in the
preparation of the accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements conform with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and with general practice within the
industries in which it operates. Except as the context otherwise requires, the Company and its
direct and indirect subsidiaries are collectively referred to in this report as the Company.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited. In the opinion of management,
all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys financial position and results
of operations for the interim periods have been made. Certain reclassifications have been made to
the 2010 unaudited consolidated financial statements to conform to the presentation used in 2011.
The results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements and the Notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010. The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and/or
disclosure through the date of filing.
2. SECURITIES
The amortized cost of securities and their approximate fair value at March 31, 2011 and December
31, 2010 were as follows:
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Available for Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
$ |
24,057 |
|
|
$ |
572 |
|
|
$ |
(69 |
) |
|
$ |
24,560 |
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
|
37,800 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
38,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
$ |
61,857 |
|
|
$ |
1,302 |
|
|
$ |
(176 |
) |
|
$ |
62,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA |
|
$ |
13,162 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
(57 |
) |
|
$ |
13,371 |
|
FHLMC |
|
|
9,667 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
9,800 |
|
GNMA |
|
|
6,720 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
6,783 |
|
CMOS |
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
32,083 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
(98 |
) |
|
$ |
32,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities designated as available for
sale |
|
$ |
93,940 |
|
|
$ |
1,802 |
|
|
$ |
(274 |
) |
|
$ |
95,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
|
2,235 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities designated as held to maturity |
|
$ |
2,235 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
2,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities |
|
$ |
96,175 |
|
|
$ |
1,821 |
|
|
$ |
(307 |
) |
|
$ |
97,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Available for Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
$ |
23,130 |
|
|
$ |
609 |
|
|
$ |
(95 |
) |
|
$ |
23,644 |
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
|
35,796 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
36,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
$ |
58,926 |
|
|
$ |
1,335 |
|
|
$ |
(320 |
) |
|
$ |
59,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA |
|
$ |
10,207 |
|
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
|
$ |
10,462 |
|
FHLMC |
|
|
9,541 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
9,567 |
|
GNMA |
|
|
4,763 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,801 |
|
CMOS |
|
|
2,659 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
27,170 |
|
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
|
$ |
27,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities designated as available for
sale |
|
$ |
86,096 |
|
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
|
$ |
(457 |
) |
|
$ |
87,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities designated as held to maturity |
|
$ |
2,140 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
$ |
2,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities |
|
$ |
88,236 |
|
|
$ |
1,805 |
|
|
$ |
(489 |
) |
|
$ |
89,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities with a total fair value of $91.4 million and $65.6 million at
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, were pledged as collateral to secure public
deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law.
7
The Company uses the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (FHLBNY) as its primary source of
overnight funds and also has several long-term advances with FHLBNY. The Company had a total of
$22.0 million and $35.6 million in borrowed funds with FHLBNY at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively. The Company has placed sufficient collateral in the form of residential and
commercial real estate loans at FHLBNY that meet FHLB collateral requirements. As a member of the
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) System, the Bank is required to hold stock in FHLBNY. The Bank
held $1.8 million and $2.4 million in FHLBNY stock as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively, at fair value.
The scheduled maturities of debt and mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 2011 are summarized
below. All maturity amounts are contractual maturities. Actual maturities may differ from
contractual maturities because certain issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or
without call premiums.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Debt securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
2,882 |
|
|
$ |
2,905 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
19,539 |
|
|
|
19,957 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
23,063 |
|
|
|
23,448 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
16,373 |
|
|
|
16,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,857 |
|
|
|
62,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
|
|
32,083 |
|
|
|
32,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,940 |
|
|
$ |
95,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
879 |
|
|
$ |
878 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
|
$ |
2,235 |
|
|
$ |
2,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information regarding unrealized losses within the Companys available for sale securities at March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, is summarized below. The securities are primarily U.S.
government-guaranteed agency securities or municipal securities. All unrealized losses are
considered temporary and related to market interest rate fluctuations.
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or longer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
$ |
3,731 |
|
|
$ |
(69 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,731 |
|
|
$ |
(69 |
) |
States and political subdivisions |
|
|
6,709 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
7,014 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
$ |
10,440 |
|
|
$ |
(173 |
) |
|
$ |
305 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
10,745 |
|
|
$ |
(176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA |
|
$ |
4,413 |
|
|
$ |
(57 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,413 |
|
|
$ |
(57 |
) |
FHLMC |
|
|
3,730 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,730 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
GNMA |
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
CMOS |
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
12,171 |
|
|
$ |
(98 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,171 |
|
|
$ |
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held To Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
466 |
|
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
1,463 |
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
23,608 |
|
|
$ |
(277 |
) |
|
$ |
771 |
|
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
24,379 |
|
|
$ |
(307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or longer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
$ |
3,705 |
|
|
$ |
(95 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,705 |
|
|
$ |
(95 |
) |
States and political subdivisions |
|
|
9,144 |
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,144 |
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
$ |
12,849 |
|
|
$ |
(320 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,849 |
|
|
$ |
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA |
|
$ |
3,113 |
|
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,113 |
|
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
FHLMC |
|
|
7,897 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,897 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
CMOS |
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
13,021 |
|
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,021 |
|
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held To Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities |
|
$ |
25,870 |
|
|
$ |
(457 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,870 |
|
|
$ |
(457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
In regard to municipal securities, the Companys general investment policy is that in-state
securities must be rated at least Moodys Baa (or equivalent) at the time of purchase.
Out-of-state issues must be rated by Moodys at least Aa (or equivalent) at the time of purchase.
The Company did not own any out-of-state municipal bonds at March 31, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
Bonds rated below A are reviewed periodically to ensure their continued credit worthiness. While
purchase of non-rated municipal securities is permitted, such purchases are limited to bonds issued
by municipalities in the Companys general market area which, in the Companys judgment, possess no
greater credit risk than Baa (or equivalent) bonds. The financial statements of the issuers of
non-rated securities are reviewed by the Bank and a credit file of the issuers is kept on each
non-rated municipal security with relevant financial information.
Although concerns have been raised in the marketplace recently about the health of municipal bonds,
the Company has not experienced any credit troubles in this portfolio and does not believe any
credit troubles are imminent. Aside from the non-rated municipal securities to local
municipalities discussed above that are considered held-to-maturity, all of the Companys
available-for-sale municipal bonds are investment-grade government obligation (G.O.) bonds. G.O.
bonds are considered safer than revenue bonds because they are backed by the full faith and credit
of the government while revenue bonds rely on the revenue produced by a particular project. All of
the Companys municipal bonds are to municipalities in NY. There has never been a default of a NY
G.O. in the history of the state. Historical performance does not guarantee future performance,
but it does indicate that the risk of loss on default of a G.O. municipal bond for the Company is
relatively low.
Management has assessed the securities available for sale in an unrealized loss position at March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and determined the decline in fair value below amortized cost to be
temporary. In making this determination, management considered the period of time the securities
were in a loss position, the percentage decline in comparison to the securities amortized cost,
and the financial condition of the issuer (primarily government or government-sponsored
enterprises). In addition, management does not intend to sell these securities and it is not more
likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their
amortized cost. Management believes the decline in fair value is primarily related to market
interest rate fluctuations and not to the credit deterioration of the individual issuers.
The Company has not recorded any other-than-temporary impairment charges in 2011 or 2010, the gross
unrealized losses amounted to less than 0.5% of the total fair value of the securities portfolio at
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and the gross unrealized loss position decreased by $0.2
million from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011. Nevertheless, it remains possible that there
could be deterioration in the asset quality of the securities portfolio in the future. The credit
worthiness of the Companys portfolio is largely reliant on the ability of U.S. government
sponsored agencies such as FHLB, Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Government
National Mortgage Association (GNMA), and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), and
municipalities throughout New York State to meet their obligations. In addition, dysfunctional
markets could materially alter the liquidity, interest rate, and pricing risk of the portfolio.
The relatively stable past performance is not a guarantee for similar performance of the Companys
securities portfolio going forward.
3. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company follows the provisions of ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.
Those provisions relate to financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value and fair value
disclosures related to financial assets and liabilities. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value and
specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on the nature of the inputs used to develop the
fair value measures. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date.
There are three levels of inputs to fair value measurements:
|
|
Level 1, meaning the use of quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets; |
|
|
|
Level 2, meaning the use of quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or
quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active or are
directly or indirectly observable; and |
|
|
|
Level 3, meaning the use of unobservable inputs. |
Observable market data should be used when available.
10
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS
The following table presents for each of the fair-value hierarchy levels as defined in this
footnote, those financial instruments which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,560 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,560 |
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,423 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,485 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,644 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,644 |
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,297 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,481 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Securities available for sale
Fair values for securities are determined using independent pricing services and
market-participating brokers. The pricing service and brokers use a variety of techniques to
arrive at fair value including market maker bids, quotes, and pricing models. Inputs to their
pricing models include recent trades, benchmark interest rates, spreads, and actual and projected
cash flows. Management obtains a single market quote or price estimate for each security.
Securities available for sale are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as the
valuation provided by the third-party provider uses observable market data.
Mortgage servicing rights
Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices.
Accordingly, the Company obtains the fair value of the MSRs using a third-party pricing provider.
The provider uses a combination of market and income valuation methodologies. All assumptions are
market driven. Therefore, mortgage servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the fair
value hierarchy as the valuation is model driven and primarily based on unobservable inputs.
The following table summarizes the changes in fair value for items measured at fair value (Level 3)
on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
388 |
|
Gains included in earnings |
|
|
4 |
|
Mortgage originations |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
435 |
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A NONRECURRING BASIS
The Company is required, on a nonrecurring basis, to adjust the carrying value of certain assets or
provide valuation allowances related to certain assets using fair value measurements. The
following table presents for each of the fair-value hierarchy levels as defined in this footnote,
those financial instruments which are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010:
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,813 |
|
|
$ |
8,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,787 |
|
|
$ |
7,787 |
|
Impaired loans
The Company evaluates and values impaired loans at the time the loan is identified as impaired, and
the fair values of such loans are estimated using Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. Fair
value is estimated based on the value of the collateral securing these loans. Collateral may
consist of real estate and/or business assets including equipment, inventory and/or accounts
receivable and the value of these assets is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed
appraisers hired by the Company. Appraised and reported values may be discounted based on
managements historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation,
estimated costs to sell, and/or managements expertise and knowledge of the client and the clients
business. The Company has an appraisal policy in which appraisals are obtained upon a loan being
downgraded on the Companys internal loan rating scale to a 5 (special mention) or a 6
(substandard) depending on the amount of the loan, the type of loan and the type of collateral.
All impaired loans are either graded a 6 or 7 on the internal loan rating scale. Subsequent to the
downgrade, if the loan remains outstanding and impaired for at least one year more, management may
require another follow-up appraisal. Between receipts of updated appraisals, if necessary,
management may perform an internal valuation based on any known changing conditions in the
marketplace such as sales of similar properties, a change in the condition of the collateral, or
feedback from local appraisers. Impaired loans had a gross value of $10.2 million, with a
valuation allowance of $1.4 million, at March 31, 2011, compared with a gross value of $9.3
million, with a valuation allowance of $1.5 million, at December 31, 2010.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the estimated fair values of the Companys financial
instruments, including those that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis
or nonrecurring basis, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
31,120 |
|
|
$ |
31,120 |
|
|
$ |
13,722 |
|
|
$ |
13,722 |
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
95,468 |
|
|
|
95,468 |
|
|
|
87,422 |
|
|
|
87,422 |
|
Held to maturity securities |
|
|
2,235 |
|
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
|
2,130 |
|
FHLB and FRB stock |
|
|
3,165 |
|
|
|
3,165 |
|
|
|
3,770 |
|
|
|
3,770 |
|
Loans and leases, net |
|
|
521,147 |
|
|
|
530,764 |
|
|
|
517,554 |
|
|
|
535,338 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
585,147 |
|
|
$ |
585,082 |
|
|
$ |
544,457 |
|
|
$ |
544,889 |
|
Other borrowed funds and securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
26,846 |
|
|
|
27,871 |
|
|
|
40,896 |
|
|
|
41,710 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
11,330 |
|
|
|
11,330 |
|
|
|
11,330 |
|
|
|
11,330 |
|
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of
financial instruments for which it is practical to estimate that value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable
estimate of fair value. Cash and Cash Equivalents includes interest-bearing deposits at other
banks.
Securities available for sale. Fair values for available-for-sale securities are determined using
independent pricing
12
services and market-participating brokers. The pricing service and brokers use
a variety of techniques to arrive at fair value including market maker bids, quotes, and pricing
models. Inputs to their pricing models include recent trades, benchmark interest rates, spreads,
and actual and projected cash flows. Management obtains a single market quote or price estimate
for each security. These quoted prices reflect current information based on orderly transactions.
These are considered Level 2 inputs under ASC 820.
Securities held to maturity. The Company holds certain municipal bonds as held-to-maturity. These
bonds are generally small in dollar amount and are issued only by certain local municipalities
within the Companys market area. The original terms are negotiated directly and on an individual
basis consistent with our loan and credit guidelines. These bonds are not traded on the open
market and management intends to hold the bonds to maturity. The fair value of held-to-maturity
securities is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which
similar agreements would be made with municipalities with similar credit ratings and for the same
remaining maturities.
FHLB and FRB stock. The carrying value of FHLB and FRB stock approximate fair value.
Loans and Leases, net. The fair value of fixed rate loans is estimated by discounting the future
cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar
credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities, net of the appropriate portion of the
allowance for loan losses. For variable rate loans, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate
of fair value. This fair value calculation is not necessarily indicative of the exit price, as
defined in ASC 820.
Mortgage servicing rights. Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with
readily observable prices. Accordingly, the Company obtains the fair value of the MSRs using a
third-party pricing provider. The provider uses a combination of market and income valuation
methodologies. All assumptions are market driven.
Deposits. The fair value of demand deposits, NOW accounts, muni-vest accounts and regular savings
accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of time deposits is
estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Other Borrowed Funds and Securities Sold Under Agreement to Repurchase. The fair value of the
short-term portion of other borrowed funds approximates its carrying value. The fair value of the
long-term portion of other borrowed funds is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based
on the Companys current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Junior Subordinated Debentures. The carrying amount of Junior Subordinated Debentures is a
reasonable estimate of fair value due to the fact that they bear a floating interest rate that
adjusts on a quarterly basis.
Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. As described in Note 7 Contingent
Liabilities and Commitments to these Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company was
a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010. Such financial instruments consist of commitments to extend permanent financing and letters
of credit. If the options are exercised by the prospective borrowers, these financial instruments
will become interest-earning assets of the Company. If the options expire, the Company retains any
fees paid by the counterparty in order to obtain the commitment or guarantee. The fair value of
commitments is estimated based upon fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking
into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the
counterparties. For fixed-rate commitments, the fair value estimation takes into consideration an
interest rate risk factor. The fair value of guarantees and letters of credit is based on fees
currently charged for similar agreements. The fair value of these off-balance sheet items at March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 approximates the recorded amounts of the related fees, which are not
considered material.
4. LOANS, LEASES, AND THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
Loans
13
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future, or until
maturity or pay-off, generally are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted
for unamortized deferred fees or costs. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance
and is recognized using the interest method. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct
origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan yield using the
effective yield method of accounting.
Loans become past due when the payment date has been missed. If payment has not been received
within 30 days, then the loan is delinquent. Delinquent loans are placed into three categories;
30-59 days past due, 60-89 days past due, or 90+ days past due. Loans 90 or more days past due are
considered non-performing.
The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent, unless
the credit is well secured and in process of collection. If the credit is not well secured and in
the process of collection, the loan is placed on non-accrual status and is subject to charge-off if
collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.
All interest due but not collected for loans that are placed on non-accrual status or charged off
is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the
cost-recovery method, until it again qualifies for an accrual basis. Any cash receipts on
non-accrual loans reduce the carrying value of the loans. Loans are returned to accrual status
when all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current, the adverse
circumstances which resulted in the delinquent payment status are resolved, and payments are made
in a timely manner for a period of time sufficient to reasonably assure their future dependability.
The Bank considers a loan impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable
that it will be unable to collect principal or interest due according to the contractual terms of
the loan. Commercial mortgage, commercial and industrial (C&I), and large balance leases
(greater than $100,000) are identified for evaluation and individually considered impaired. These
loans and leases are assessed for any impairment. Loan impairment is measured based on the present
value of expected cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate or, as a practical
expedient, at the loans observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is
collateral dependent. Consumer loans and smaller balance leases are collectively evaluated for
impairment. Since these loans and leases are not individually identified and evaluated, they are
not considered impaired loans.
The Bank monitors the credit risk in its loan portfolio by reviewing certain credit quality
indicators (CQI). The primary CQI for its commercial mortgage and C&I portfolios is the
individual loans credit risk rating. The following list provides a description of the credit risk
ratings that are used internally by the Bank when assessing the adequacy of its allowance for loan
and lease losses:
|
|
|
1-3-Pass: Risk Rated 1-3 loans are loans with a slight risk of loss. The loan is
secured by collateral of sufficient value to cover the loan by an acceptable margin. The
financial statements of the company demonstrate sufficient net worth and repayment ability.
The company has established an acceptable credit history with the bank and typically has a
proven track record of performance. Management is experienced, and has an at least average
ability to manage the company. The industry has an average or less than average
susceptibility to wide fluctuations in business cycles. |
|
|
|
|
This risk rating includes all accruing consumer loans, including residential mortgages and
home equities, that are less than 60 days past due. |
|
|
|
|
4-Watch: Although generally acceptable, a higher degree of risk is evident in these
watch credits. Obligor assessment factors may have elements which reflect marginally
acceptable conditions warranting more careful review and analysis and monitoring. |
|
|
|
|
The obligors balance sheet reflects generally acceptable asset quality with some elements
weak or marginally acceptable. Liquidity may be somewhat strained, but is at an acceptable
level to support operations. Obligor may be fully leveraged with ratios higher than
industry averages. High leverage is negatively impacting the company, leaving it vulnerable
to adverse change. Inconsistent or declining capability to service existing debt
requirements evidenced by debt service coverage temporarily below or near acceptable level.
The margin of collateral may be adequate, but declining or fluctuating in value. Company
management may be unproven, but capable. Rapid expansion or acquisition may increase
leverage or reduce cash flow. |
14
|
|
|
Negative industry conditions or weaker management could also be characteristic. Proper
consideration should be given to companies in a high growth phase or in development business
segments that may not have achieve sustainable earnings. |
|
|
|
|
Obligors demonstrate sufficient financial flexibility to react to and positively address the
root cause of the adverse financial trends without significant deviations from their current
business strategy. The rating is also used for borrowers that have made significant
progress in resolving their financial weaknesses. |
|
|
|
|
5-O.A.E.M. (Other Assets Especially Mentioned): Special Mention (SM) A special
mention asset has potential weaknesses that warrant managements close attention. If left
uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment
prospects for the asset or in the institutions credit position at some future date. SM
assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to
warrant adverse classification. |
|
|
|
|
SM assets have potential weaknesses that may, if not checked or corrected, weaken the asset
or inadequately protect the institutions position at some future date. These assets pose
elevated risk, but their weakness does not yet justify a substandard classification.
Borrowers may be experiencing adverse operating trends (declining revenues or margins) or an
ill proportioned balance sheet (e.g. increasing inventory without an increase in sales, high
leverage, tight liquidity). |
|
|
|
|
Adverse economic or market conditions, such as interest rate increases or the entry of a new
competitor, may also support a special mention rating. |
|
|
|
|
Nonfinancial reasons for rating a credit exposure special mention include management
problems, pending litigation, an ineffective loan agreement or other material structural
weakness, and any other significant deviation from prudent lending practices. |
|
|
|
|
The SM rating is designed to identify a specific level of risk and concern about asset
quality. Although an SM asset has a higher probability of default than a pass asset, its
default is not imminent. |
|
|
|
|
This risk rating includes the pool of consumer loans, including residential mortgages and
home equities, that are 60-89 days past due. |
|
|
|
|
6-Substandard: A substandard asset is inadequately protected by the current sound worth
and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so
classified must have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, that jeopardize the
liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the bank
will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. |
|
|
|
|
Substandard assets have a high probability of payment default, or they have other
well-defined weaknesses. They require more intensive supervision by bank management. |
|
|
|
|
Substandard assets are generally characterized by current or expected unprofitable
operations, inadequate debt service coverage, inadequate liquidity, or marginal
capitalization. Repayment may depend on collateral or other credit risk subsidies. For
some substandard assets, the likelihood of full collection of interest and principal may be
in doubt; such assets should be placed on non-accrual. Although substandard assets in the
aggregate will have distinct potential for loss, an individual assets loss potential does
not have to be distinct for the asset to be rated substandard. These loans are periodically
reviewed and tested for impairment. |
|
|
|
|
This risk rating includes the pool of consumer loans, including residential mortgages and
home equities, that are 90 or more days past due or in non-accrual status. |
|
|
|
|
7-Doubtful: An asset classified doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one
classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or
liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values,
highly questionable and improbable. |
15
|
|
|
A doubtful asset has a high probability of total or substantial loss, but because of
specific pending events that may strengthen the asset, its classification of loss is
deferred. |
|
|
|
|
Doubtful borrowers are usually in default, lack adequate liquidity or capital, and lack the
resources necessary to remain an operating entity. Pending events can include mergers,
acquisitions, liquidations, capital injections, the perfection of liens on additional
collateral, the valuation of collateral, and refinancing. |
|
|
|
|
Generally, pending events should be resolved within a relatively short period and the
ratings will be adjusted based on the new information. Because of high probability of loss,
non-accrual accounting treatment is required for doubtful assets. |
|
|
|
|
8-Loss: Assets classified loss are considered uncollectable and of such little value
that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does not
mean that the assets have absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather that it is
not practical or desirable to defer writing off this basically worthless asset even though
partial recovery may be achieved in the future. |
|
|
|
|
With loss assets, the underlying borrowers are often in bankruptcy, have formally suspended
debt repayments, or have otherwise ceased normal business operations. Once an asset is
classified loss, there is little prospect of collecting either its principal or interest.
When access to collateral, rather than the value of the collateral, is a problem, a less
severe classification may be appropriate. However, management should not maintain an asset
on the balance sheet if realizing its value would require long-term litigation or other
lengthy recovery efforts. Losses are to be recorded in the period an obligation becomes
uncollectible. |
Leases
The Banks leasing operations consists principally of the leasing of various types of small ticket
commercial equipment. The Company follows ASC Topic 840, Leases, for all of its direct financing
leases. The net investment in direct financing leases is the sum of all minimum lease payments and
estimated residual values, less unearned income, net of the remaining mark. In the third quarter
of 2009, the Company announced its intention to sell the leasing portfolio. As a result, the
Company classified the leasing portfolio as held-for-sale and marked the portfolio down to its fair
market value as of June 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, management decided to service the
portfolio to maturity and transferred it to held-for-investment. The carrying value of the leasing
portfolio amounted to $12.4 million and $15.5 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. The CQI used for leases are delinquency and accruing status. The leasing CQIs are
discussed in more detail in the Credit Quality Indicators section of this footnote.
Loan and Lease Portfolio Composition
The following table presents selected information on the composition of the Companys loan and
lease portfolio as of the dates indicated:
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgages |
|
$ |
69,815 |
|
|
$ |
69,958 |
|
Commercial and multi-family |
|
|
274,138 |
|
|
|
261,371 |
|
Construction-Residential |
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
Construction-Commercial |
|
|
25,397 |
|
|
|
32,332 |
|
Home equities |
|
|
53,736 |
|
|
|
53,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate loans |
|
|
424,498 |
|
|
|
418,101 |
|
|
Direct financing leases |
|
|
12,449 |
|
|
|
15,475 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
92,120 |
|
|
|
91,445 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
2,458 |
|
Other |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
Net deferred loan origination costs |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross loans |
|
|
531,629 |
|
|
|
527,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(10,482 |
) |
|
|
(10,424 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
$ |
521,147 |
|
|
$ |
517,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgages: The Company originates adjustable-rate and fixed-rate, one-to-four-family
residential real estate loans for the construction, purchase or refinancing of a mortgage. These
loans are collateralized by owner-occupied properties located in the Companys market area. They
are amortized over 10 to 30 years. Loans on one-to-four-family residential real estate are mostly
originated in amounts of no more than 80% of appraised value or have private mortgage insurance.
Mortgage title insurance and hazard insurance are normally required. Construction loans have a
unique risk, because they are secured by an incomplete dwelling.
Due to the lack of foreclosure activity and absence of any ongoing litigation, the Company has no
accrual for loss contingencies or potential costs associated with foreclosure-related activities.
The Bank sells certain fixed rate residential mortgages to FNMA, while maintaining the servicing
rights for those mortgages. During the three month period ended March 31, 2011, the Bank sold
mortgages to FNMA totaling $7.3 million, as compared with $2.0 million sold during the three month
period ended March 31, 2010. At March 31, 2011, the Bank had a loan servicing portfolio principal
balance of $49.8 million upon which it earns servicing fees, as compared with $44.2 million at
December 31, 2010. The value of the mortgage servicing rights for that portfolio was $0.4 million
at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Residential mortgage loans held-for-sale were $1.4
million at March 31, 2011, compared with $2.9 million at December 31, 2010. The Company has never
been contacted by FNMA to repurchase any loans due to improper documentation or fraud.
Commercial and Multi-Family Mortgages: Commercial real estate loans are made to finance the
purchases of real estate with completed structures or in the midst of being constructed. These
commercial real estate loans are secured by first liens on the real estate, which may include
apartments, hotels, retail stores or plazas, healthcare facilities, and other non-owner-occupied
facilities. These loans are less risky than commercial and industrial loans, since they are
secured by real estate and buildings. The Company offers commercial mortgage loans with up to an
80% LTV ratio for up to 20 years on a variable and fixed rate basis. Many of these mortgage loans
either mature or are subject to a rate call after three to five years. The Companys underwriting
analysis includes credit verification, independent appraisals, a review of the borrowers financial
condition, and the underlying cash flows. These loans are typically originated in amounts of no
more than 80% of the appraised value of the property. Construction loans have a unique risk,
because they are secured by an incomplete dwelling.
Home Equities: The Company originates home equity lines of credit and second mortgage loans (loans
secured by a second lien position on owner-occupied one-to-four-family residential real estate).
These loans carry a higher risk than first mortgage residential loans as they are in a second
position relating to collateral. Risk is reduced through underwriting criteria, which include
credit verification, appraisals, a review of the borrowers financial condition,
17
and personal cash flows. A security interest, with title insurance when necessary, is taken in the
underlying real estate.
Direct Financing Leases: From January 2005 to April 2009 the Company originated direct financing
leases of commercial small-ticket general business equipment to companies located throughout the
United States. These leases carry a high risk of loss. As a result of the increase in credit
risks, poor performance in the portfolio, the lack of strategic fit with the Companys community
banking philosophy, and with the intention of reallocating capital back to its core business,
management announced its exit from the national leasing business in April 2009. As a result of
managements decision to sell the portfolio a mark-to-market adjustment of $7.2 million was made on
June 30, 2009. The mark was charged off against the allowance. The portfolio was subsequently
placed back into held-for-investment as of September 30, 2009 after management determined that a
greater value for the portfolio would be realized by keeping it and servicing it to maturity rather
than selling it. The portfolio was re-classified as held-for-investment using the same $7.2 million
mark. Since that time, leases that are determined to have zero value have been applied to the
remaining mark, rather than charged off through the allowance. There is an allowance for lease
losses for $1.5 million at March 31, 2011.
Commercial and Industrial Loans: These loans generally include term loans and lines of credit.
Such loans are made available to businesses for working capital (including inventory and
receivables), business expansion (including acquisition of real estate, expansion and improvements)
and equipment purchases. As a general practice, a collateral lien is placed on equipment or other
assets owned by the borrower. These loans carry a higher risk than commercial real estate loans
by the nature of the underlying collateral, which can be business assets such as equipment and
accounts receivable. To reduce the risk, management also attempts to secure real estate as
collateral and obtain personal guarantees of the borrowers. To further reduce risk and enhance
liquidity, these loans generally carry variable rates of interest, re-pricing in three- to
five-year periods, and have a maturity of ten years or less. Lines of credit generally carry
floating rates of interest (e.g., prime plus a margin).
Consumer Loans: The Company funds a variety of consumer loans, including direct automobile loans,
recreational vehicle loans, boat loans, aircraft loans, home improvement loans, and personal loans
(collateralized and uncollateralized). Most of these loans carry a fixed rate of interest with
principal repayment terms typically ranging up to five years, based upon the nature of the
collateral and the size of the loan. The majority of consumer loans are underwritten on a secured
basis using the underlying collateral being financed. A minimal amount of loans are unsecured,
which carry a high risk of loss.
Other Loans: These loans include $0.1 million and $0.3 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively, of overdrawn deposit accounts classified as loans.
Net loan commitment fees or costs for commitment periods greater than one year are deferred and
amortized into fee income or other expense on a straight-line basis over the commitment period.
Credit Quality Indicators
The following tables provide data, at the class level, of credit quality indicators of certain
loans and leases for the dates specified:
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Exposure By |
|
Commercial Real |
|
|
Commercial Real |
|
|
Total Commercial |
|
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Estate Construction |
|
|
Estate Other |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Commercial |
|
3 |
|
$ |
19,441 |
|
|
$ |
222,248 |
|
|
$ |
241,689 |
|
|
$ |
61,931 |
|
4 |
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
36,929 |
|
|
|
39,140 |
|
|
|
19,329 |
|
5 |
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
5,442 |
|
|
|
7,718 |
|
|
|
5,090 |
|
6 |
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
9,519 |
|
|
|
10,988 |
|
|
|
4,847 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,397 |
|
|
$ |
274,138 |
|
|
$ |
299,535 |
|
|
$ |
92,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Corporate Credit |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Exposure By |
|
Commercial Real |
|
|
Commercial Real |
|
|
Total Commercial |
|
|
|
|
Credit Rating |
|
Estate Construction |
|
|
Estate Other |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Commercial |
|
3 |
|
$ |
25,584 |
|
|
$ |
212,825 |
|
|
$ |
238,409 |
|
|
$ |
60,728 |
|
4 |
|
|
2,703 |
|
|
|
37,393 |
|
|
|
40,096 |
|
|
|
19,692 |
|
5 |
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
2,176 |
|
|
|
4,741 |
|
|
|
4,699 |
|
6 |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
8,977 |
|
|
|
10,457 |
|
|
|
4,966 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
32,332 |
|
|
$ |
261,371 |
|
|
$ |
293,703 |
|
|
$ |
91,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys risk ratings are monitored by the individual relationship managers and changed
as deemed appropriate after receiving updated financial information from the borrowers or
deterioration or improvement in the performance of a loan is evident in the customers payment
history. Each commercial relationship is individually assigned a risk rating. The Company also
maintains a loan review process that monitors the management of the Companys commercial loan
portfolio by the relationship managers. The Companys loan review function reviews at least 40% of
the commercial and commercial mortgage portfolio annually.
The Companys consumer loans, including residential mortgages and home equity loans, are not
individually risk rated or reviewed in the Companys loan review process. Consumers are not
required to provide the Company with updated financial information as a commercial customer is.
Consumer loans are also smaller in balances. Given the lack of updated information since the
initial underwriting of the loan and small size of individual loans, the Company uses the
delinquency status as the credit quality indicator for consumer loans. The delinquency table is
shown below. The Company does not lend to sub-prime borrowers. Unless the loan is well secured
and in the process of collection, all consumer loans that are more than 90 days past due are placed
in non-accrual status.
Similar to consumer loans, direct financing leases are evaluated in pools according to delinquency
and accruing status rather than assigned risk ratings. Given the comparable lower credit quality
of the leasing portfolio, leases are rarely kept in accruing status beyond 30 days past due.
Non-accrual leases are assigned a reserve percentage based on the historical loss history of the
Companys non-accrual lease portfolio. Evaluating non-accruing leases as a pool is appropriate as
they are small-balance and homogeneous in nature. On a quarterly basis, large leases (defined as
leases greater than $100,000 in balances) are evaluated for any deterioration not readily apparent
through payment performance. If any risk factors become apparent during the review such as
deteriorating financial performance for the customers business or requests for a restructuring
from the original terms of the contract, management places those large leases that are performing
from a payment perspective but have some indications of credit deterioration
19
into a second pool.
These large leases with additional risk are assigned a reserve percentage reflective of the
additional risk characteristics while taking into account the adequate payment performance. The
Company does have two large leases in which it performs specific impairment tests because they
contain significantly different risk characteristics than the remaining leasing portfolio. One of
the leases is with a local borrower with whom the Bank has a developed relationship and a
restructuring plan is in place. The second lease is with a large public company that recently
declared bankruptcy. The Company is considered a secured creditor in the bankruptcy and has
received payments as scheduled in 2011. While the two large leases have characteristics of
troubled credits and are classified as nonaccrual, management does not believe these two leases
have similar characteristics as compared with the remaining lease portfolio. Management believes
appropriate reserves have been established on an individual basis for the two leases. All other
leases are placed in a third pool and assigned a reserve percentage
commensurate with the credit history of the Companys leasing portfolio, delinquency trends,
non-accrual trends, charge-off trends, and general macro-economic factors.
Past Due Loans and Leases
The following tables provide an analysis of the age of the recorded investment in loans and leases
that are past due as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Past |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Total |
|
|
90+ Days |
|
|
Loans and |
|
|
|
30-59 days |
|
|
60-89 days |
|
|
90+ days |
|
|
Due |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
Leases |
|
Commercial and
industrial |
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,696 |
|
|
$ |
1,914 |
|
|
$ |
90,206 |
|
|
$ |
92,120 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,808 |
|
Residential real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
68,419 |
|
|
|
69,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
708 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
2,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,835 |
|
|
|
5,453 |
|
|
|
268,685 |
|
|
|
274,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,546 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
23,929 |
|
|
|
25,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
Home equities |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
53,249 |
|
|
|
53,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439 |
|
Direct financing leases |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
10,860 |
|
|
|
12,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,127 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
$ |
4,135 |
|
|
$ |
1,589 |
|
|
$ |
6,998 |
|
|
$ |
12,722 |
|
|
$ |
518,907 |
|
|
$ |
531,629 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
13,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Past |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Total |
|
|
90+ Days |
|
|
Loans and |
|
|
|
30-59 days |
|
|
60-89 days |
|
|
90+ days |
|
|
Due |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
Leases |
|
Commercial and
industrial |
|
$ |
403 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
1,827 |
|
|
$ |
2,430 |
|
|
$ |
89,015 |
|
|
$ |
91,445 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,203 |
|
Residential real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
|
68,219 |
|
|
|
69,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
696 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
4,196 |
|
|
|
2,014 |
|
|
|
6,561 |
|
|
|
254,810 |
|
|
|
261,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,724 |
|
Construction |
|
|
6,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
|
7,932 |
|
|
|
24,400 |
|
|
|
32,332 |
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
Home equities |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
52,565 |
|
|
|
53,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
Direct financing leases |
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
13,064 |
|
|
|
15,475 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,930 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
2,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans |
|
$ |
8,845 |
|
|
$ |
5,148 |
|
|
$ |
8,230 |
|
|
$ |
22,223 |
|
|
$ |
505,755 |
|
|
$ |
527,978 |
|
|
$ |
806 |
|
|
$ |
13,121 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
The provision for loan and lease losses represents the amount charged against the Banks earnings
to maintain an allowance for probable loan and lease losses inherent in the portfolio based on
managements evaluation of the loan and lease portfolio at the balance sheet date. Factors
considered by the Banks management in establishing the allowance include: the collectability of
individual loans and leases, current loan and lease concentrations, charge-off history, delinquent
loan and lease percentages, the fair value of the collateral, input from regulatory agencies, and
general economic conditions.
On a quarterly basis, management of the Bank meets to review and determine the adequacy of the
allowance for loan and lease losses. In making this determination, the Banks management analyzes
the ultimate collectability of
the loans and leases in its portfolio by incorporating feedback provided by the Banks internal
loan and lease staff, an independent internal loan and lease review function and information
provided by examinations performed by regulatory agencies.
The analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses is composed of two components: specific
credit allocation and general portfolio allocation. The specific credit allocation includes a
detailed review of each impaired loan and allocation is made based on this analysis. Factors may
include the appraisal value of the collateral, the age of the appraisal, the type of collateral,
the performance of the loan to date, the performance of the borrowers business based on financial
statements, and legal judgments involving the borrower. The general portfolio allocation consists
of an assigned reserve percentage based on the historical loss experience and other quantitative
and qualitative factors of the loan or lease category.
The general portfolio allocation is segmented into pools of loans with similar characteristics.
Separate pools of loans include loans pooled by loan grade and by portfolio segment. The Company
does not have sufficient meaningful data to perform a traditional loss migration analysis and thus
has implemented alternative procedures. Loans graded 5 or worse (criticized loans) that exceed a
material balance threshold are evaluated by the Companys credit department to determine if the
collateral for the loan is worth less than the loan. All of these shortfalls are added together
and divided by the respective loan pool to calculate the quantitative factor applied to the
respective pool. These loans are not considered impaired because the cash flow of the customer and
the payment history of the loan suggest that it is not probable that the Company will be unable to
collect the full amount of principal and interest as contracted and are thus still accruing
interest.
Loans that are graded 4 or better (non-criticized loans) are reserved in separate loan pools in
the general portfolio
21
allocation. A weighted average 5-year historical charge-off ratio by
portfolio segment is calculated and applied against these loan pools.
For both the criticized and non-criticized loan pools in the general portfolio allocation,
additional qualitative factors are applied. The qualitative factors applied to the general
portfolio allocation reflect managements evaluation of various conditions. The conditions
evaluated include the following: industry and regional conditions; seasoning of the loan and lease
portfolio and changes in the composition of and growth in the loan and lease portfolio; the
strength and duration of the business cycle; existing general economic and business conditions in
the lending areas; credit quality trends in non-accruing loans and leases; timing of the
identification of downgrades; historical loan and lease charge-off experience; and the results of
bank regulatory examinations. Due to the nature of the loans, the criticized loan pools carry
significantly higher qualitative factors than the non-criticized pools.
Direct financing leases are segregated from the rest of the loan portfolio in determining the
appropriate allowance for that portfolio segment. Unlike the loan portfolio, the Company does have
sufficient historical loss data to perform a migration analysis for non-accruing leases.
Management periodically updates this analysis by examining the non-accruing lease portfolio at
different points in time and studying what percentage of the non-accruing portfolio ends up being
charged off. There are selected large leases in non-accruing status which carry different
characteristics than the rest of the portfolio. The Company has more information on these
particular lessees. The underwriting for these leases was different due to the size of the leases
and the subsequent servicing of these leases was also more intensive. Due to the elevated level of
information on these leases, the Company is able to specifically analyze these leases and allocate
an appropriate specific reserve based on the information available including cash flow, payment
history, and collateral value. These selected large leases are not considered when performing the
migration analysis. All of the remaining leases not in non-accrual are allocated a reserve based
on several factors including: delinquency and non-accrual trends, charge-off trends, and national
economic conditions.
Changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Beginning balance, January 1 |
|
$ |
10,424 |
|
|
$ |
6,971 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
Recoveries |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Loans and leases charged off |
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Ending balance, March 31 |
|
$ |
10,482 |
|
|
$ |
8,170 |
|
The following tables summarize the allowance for loan and lease losses according to portfolio
segment, as of March 31, 2011:
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
|
Mortgages* |
|
|
Consumer ^ |
|
|
Mortgages* |
|
|
HELOC |
|
|
Leases |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
Total |
|
Allowance for loan and lease
losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
3,435 |
|
|
$ |
4,252 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
548 |
|
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
$ |
1,471 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
10,424 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(437 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Provision |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
3,330 |
|
|
$ |
4,384 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
$ |
1,471 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
10,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and
lease losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated
for impairment |
|
$ |
546 |
|
|
$ |
768 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,376 |
|
Collectively evaluated
for impairment |
|
|
2,784 |
|
|
$ |
3,585 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
9,075 |
|
Loans acquired with
deteriorated credit
quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,330 |
|
|
$ |
4,384 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
$ |
1,471 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
10,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated
for impairment |
|
$ |
1,808 |
|
|
$ |
7,860 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,066 |
|
Collectively evaluated
for impairment |
|
|
90,312 |
|
|
|
291,521 |
|
|
|
2,152 |
|
|
|
71,227 |
|
|
|
53,736 |
|
|
|
12,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
521,061 |
|
Loans acquired with
deteriorated credit
quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
92,120 |
|
|
$ |
299,535 |
|
|
$ |
2,298 |
|
|
$ |
71,227 |
|
|
$ |
53,736 |
|
|
$ |
12,449 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
531,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes construction loans |
|
^ |
|
Includes other loans |
Impaired Loans and Leases
The following tables provide data, at the class level, of impaired loans and leases as of the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Foregone |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
With no related allowance
recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Residential real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Home equities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct financing leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans and leases |
|
$ |
3,289 |
|
|
$ |
3,621 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,946 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Foregone |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
With a related allowance
recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
1,445 |
|
|
$ |
2,115 |
|
|
$ |
546 |
|
|
$ |
1,864 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Residential real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
5,172 |
|
|
|
5,988 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
4,897 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct financing leases |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans and leases |
|
$ |
7,015 |
|
|
$ |
8,512 |
|
|
$ |
1,407 |
|
|
$ |
7,375 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Foregone |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
1,808 |
|
|
$ |
2,479 |
|
|
$ |
546 |
|
|
$ |
2,228 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Residential real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
6,546 |
|
|
|
7,504 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
6,272 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Home equities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct financing leases |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans and leases |
|
$ |
10,304 |
|
|
$ |
12,133 |
|
|
$ |
1,407 |
|
|
$ |
10,321 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
2,203 |
|
|
$ |
2,610 |
|
|
$ |
803 |
|
Residential real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
5,724 |
|
|
|
6,515 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
Construction |
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Home equities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct financing leases |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans and leases |
|
$ |
9,299 |
|
|
$ |
10,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, the Company did not have any impaired loans for which there is no related
allowance for credit loss. The interest income in the preceding tables as of March 31, 2011 was
interest income recognized prior to these loans and leases being identified as impaired and placed
on non-accrual. The Company did not recognize any interest income on those loans and leases while
they were on non-accrual and impaired.
Non-performing loans and leases
The following table sets forth information regarding non-performing loans and leases as of the
dates specified:
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Non-accruing loans and leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgages |
|
$ |
708 |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
Commercial and multi-family |
|
|
6,546 |
|
|
|
5,724 |
|
Construction-residential |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
Construction-commercial |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
Home equities |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate loans |
|
|
9,345 |
|
|
|
7,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct financing leases |
|
|
2,127 |
|
|
|
2,930 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accruing loans and leases |
|
$ |
13,429 |
|
|
$ |
13,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans 90+ days past due |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans and leases |
|
$ |
13,449 |
|
|
$ |
13,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans and leases
to total assets |
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
|
2.07 |
% |
Total non-performing loans and leases
to total loans and leases |
|
|
2.53 |
% |
|
|
2.64 |
% |
Troubled debt restructurings
The Company had $6.0 million in loans and leases that were restructured in a troubled debt
restructuring (TDR) at March 31, 2011, compared with $2.5 million at December 31, 2010. $4.4
million and $1.3 million of those balances were in non-accrual status at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. Any TDR that is placed on non-accrual is not reverted back to
accruing status until the borrower makes timely payments as contracted for at least six months.
Those loans and leases that are in accruing status have shown evidence of performance for at least
six months as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. None of the restructurings are covered
under loss-sharing arrangements with the FDIC or were made under a government assistance program.
These restructurings were allowed in an effort to maximize the Companys ability to collect on
loans and leases where borrowers were experiencing financial difficulty. Previous to the first
quarter of 2011, most of the Companys TDRs have been in the leasing portfolio. The most common
modification and concession made by the Company is to permit the borrower to skip a lease payment
and add an additional payment to the end of the lease. The increase in the first quarter of 2011 in
commercial real estate TDRs is due to the addition of a single loan in the amount of $3.5 million.
The loan, which was placed on nonaccrual in the fourth quarter of 2010 and considered impaired as
of December 31, 2010, was restructured to a reduced payment structure in the first quarter of 2011.
Modifications made to loans in a troubled debt restructuring did not have a material impact on the
Companys net income for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. The general practice of the
Bank is to work with borrowers so that they are able to pay back their loan or lease in full. If a
borrower continues to be delinquent or cannot meet the terms of a TDR, the loan or lease will be
placed on non-accrual or charged off. TDRs are reserved similarly to the rest of the portfolio in
that their CQIs are considered. The reserve for an impaired TDR is based upon the present value of
the future expected cash flows discounted at the loans original effective rate or upon the fair
value of the collateral less costs to sell, if the loan is deemed collateral dependent. There were
no commitments to lend additional funds to debtors owing loans or leases whose terms have been
modified in TDRs. The following table summarizes the loans and leases that were classified as
troubled debt restructurings as of the dates indicated.
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Commerical and industrial |
|
$ |
362 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
Residential real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commerical real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and multi family |
|
|
3,622 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equities |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Direct financing leases |
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
2,155 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total troubled restructured loans and leases |
|
$ |
6,015 |
|
|
$ |
2,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covered Loans and the Related Allowance
On July 24, 2009, the Bank entered into a definitive purchase and assumption agreement with the
FDIC under which the Bank assumed approximately $51.0 million in liabilities, consisting almost
entirely of deposits, and purchased substantially all of the assets of Waterford Village Bank. The
loan portfolio acquired in the transaction was $42.0 million. The loans acquired in that
acquisition are referred to as covered loans because they are covered by a loss sharing
agreement with the FDIC. The agreement calls for the FDIC to reimburse the Bank for 80% of losses
up to $5.6 million and to reimburse the Bank for 95% of losses beyond that threshold. At
acquisition, the Company marked the covered loan portfolio to its market value and the allowance
for loan and lease losses related to the covered loans was zero. Since acquisition, management has
provisioned for any incremental increases in estimated credit losses due to deterioration in
specific loans or increased risk factors on pools of loans. As a result of the FDIC guarantees,
the provision for loan and lease losses and the allowance for loan and lease losses at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010 are presented net of FDIC guarantees related to covered loans. The
following table depicts the allowance for loan and lease losses related to covered loans as of
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Covered loans |
|
$ |
31,832 |
|
|
$ |
34,157 |
|
Incremental estimated credit losses since acquisition |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
FDIC guarantee |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. PER SHARE DATA
The common stock per share information is based upon the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during each period. The Company had 10,661 and 5,412 dilutive shares for the three
month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Potential common shares that would have the effect of increasing diluted earnings per share are
considered to be anti-dilutive and not included in calculating diluted earnings per share. For the
three months periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, there were approximately 153,150 and 162,447 shares, respectively, that were not
included in calculating diluted earnings per share because their effect was anti-dilutive.
27
6. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company is comprised of two primary business segments, banking and insurance agency activities.
The following tables set forth information regarding these segments for the three month periods
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking Activities |
|
|
Activities |
|
|
Total |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
6,327 |
|
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
6,297 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) after
provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
5,839 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
5,809 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
Insurance service and fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,089 |
|
|
|
2,089 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
6,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,929 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
2,665 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,423 |
|
|
$ |
452 |
|
|
$ |
1,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance Agency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking Activities |
|
|
Activities |
|
|
Total |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
6,127 |
|
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
|
$ |
6,078 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) after
provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
4,913 |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
4,864 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
Insurance service and fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
4,977 |
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
6,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
2,115 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,003 |
|
|
$ |
444 |
|
|
$ |
1,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND COMMITMENTS
The unaudited consolidated financial statements do not reflect various commitments and contingent
liabilities, which arise in the normal course of business, and which involve elements of credit
risk, interest rate risk and liquidity risk. These commitments and contingent liabilities consist
of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. A summary of the Banks commitments
and contingent liabilities is as follows:
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
131,638 |
|
|
$ |
136,549 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
3,570 |
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
135,208 |
|
|
$ |
140,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit include some exposure to credit loss in
the event of nonperformance of the customer. The Banks credit policies and procedures for credit
commitments and financial guarantees are the same as those for extensions of credit that are
recorded on the Companys unaudited consolidated balance sheets. Because these instruments have
fixed maturity dates, and because they may expire without being drawn upon, they do not necessarily
represent cash requirements of the Bank. The Bank has not incurred any losses on its commitments
during the past two years.
Certain lending commitments for construction residential mortgage loans are considered derivative
instruments under the guidelines of GAAP. The changes in the fair value of these commitments, due
to interest rate risk, are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as the fair value of
these derivatives is not considered material.
The Company is subject to possible litigation proceedings in the normal course of business. As of
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no claims pending against the Company that
management considered material.
8. NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COSTS
On January 31, 2008, the Bank froze its defined benefit pension plan. The plan covered
substantially all Company employees. The plan provides benefits that are based on the employees
compensation and years of service. Under the freeze, eligible employees will receive at retirement
the benefits already earned through January 31, 2008, but have not accrued any additional benefits
since then. As a result, service cost is no longer incurred.
The Bank used an actuarial method of amortizing prior service cost and unrecognized net gains or
losses which result from actual expense and assumptions being different than those that are
projected. The amortization method the Bank used recognized the prior service cost and net gains or
losses over the average remaining service period of active employees.
The Bank also maintains a nonqualified supplemental executive retirement plan covering certain
members of the Companys senior management. The Bank uses an actuarial method of amortizing
unrecognized net gains or losses which result from actual expense and assumptions being different
than those that are projected. The amortization method the Bank uses recognizes the net gains or
losses over the average remaining service period of active employees.
The following table presents the net periodic cost for the Banks defined benefit pension plan and
supplemental executive retirement plan for the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Retirement Plan |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Amortization of the net loss |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-02, A Creditors Determination of Whether a Restructuring
Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. The main objective of the ASU is to clarify guidance in
identifying restructuring of receivables that constitute troubled debt restructurings for a
creditor so that there is more consistent application of U.S. GAAP for debt restructurings. The
ASU clarifies the guidance on a creditors evaluation of whether it has granted a concession and
whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. The new guidance is effective for interim
periods beginning after June 15, 2011. The Company will adopt ASU 2011-02 for the three month
period ended September 30, 2011. The Company is evaluating whether the new guidance will have any
impact on the Companys identification of troubled debt restructurings.
30
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain certain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), that involve
substantial risks and uncertainties. When used in this report, or in the documents incorporated by
reference herein, the words anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, may, plan,
seek, and similar expressions identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements include statements regarding the Companys business plans, prospects, growth and
operating strategies, statements regarding the asset quality of the Companys loan and investment
portfolios, and estimates of the Companys risks and future costs and benefits.
These forward-looking statements are based largely on the expectations of the Companys management
and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to general
economic conditions, either nationally or in the Companys market areas, that are worse than
expected; increased competition among depository or other financial institutions; inflation and
changes in the interest rate environment that reduce the Companys margins or reduce the fair value
of financial instruments; changes in laws or government regulations affecting financial
institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements; the Companys ability
to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities; the Companys ability to
successfully integrate acquired entities; changes in accounting pronouncements and practices, as
adopted by financial institution regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and saving
habits; changes in the Companys organization, compensation and benefit plans; and other factors
discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as in the Companys periodic
reports filed with the SEC, in particular the Risk Factors discussed in Item 1A of the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. Many of these factors are
beyond the Companys control and are difficult to predict.
Because of these and other uncertainties, the Companys actual results, performance or achievements
could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements contained herein. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made.
The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking information,
whether as a result of new, updated information, future events or otherwise.
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The Companys Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and follow general practices within the industries
in which it operates. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates,
assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the Companys Unaudited Consolidated
Financial Statements and Notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on
information available as of the date of the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
Accordingly, as this information changes, the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements could
reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater
reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments, and as such, have a greater
possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported.
Estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be
recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the financial
statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established,
or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event. Carrying assets
and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial statement volatility. The fair
values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities
are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other third-party sources, when
available. When third-party information is not available, valuation adjustments are estimated in
good faith by management primarily through the use of internal cash flow modeling techniques.
Refer to Note 3 Fair Value Measurements to the Companys Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further detail on fair
value measurement.
Significant accounting policies followed by the Company are presented in Note 1 Organization
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Item 8 in its Annual
31
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. These policies, along with the
disclosures presented in the other Notes to the Companys Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K and in this financial review, provide information on
how significant assets and liabilities are presented in the Companys Unaudited Consolidated
Financial Statements and how those values are determined.
Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the
methods, assumptions and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the
determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses and valuation of goodwill to be the
accounting areas that require the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such, could be most
subject to revision as new information becomes available.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses represents managements estimate of probable losses in the
Companys loan and lease portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan and lease
losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment on the
part of management and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future
cash flows on impaired loans and leases, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans and leases
based on historical loss experience and consideration of current economic trends and conditions,
all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan and lease portfolio also
represents the largest asset type on the Companys Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets. Note 1
to the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 in the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, describes the methodology used to determine the
allowance for loan and lease losses.
Goodwill
The amount of goodwill reflected in the Companys Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements is
required to be tested by management for impairment on at least an annual basis. The test for
impairment of goodwill on the identified reporting unit is considered a critical accounting
estimate because it requires judgment on the part of management and the use of estimates related to
the growth assumptions and market multiples used in the valuation model. The goodwill impairment
testing is typically performed annually on December 31st. No impairment charges were
incurred in the most recent test and the fair value of the tested reporting unit substantially
exceeded its fair value.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Loan and Lease Activity
Total loans and leases grew to $531.6 million at March 31, 2011, reflecting a $3.6 million or 0.7%
increase from December 31, 2010. The national direct financing lease portfolio declined $3.1
million during the first quarter to $12.4 million at March 31, 2011 as the Company ceased lease
originations in the second quarter of 2009 and is winding down the portfolio and exiting this
business line. The national direct financing lease portfolio currently comprises 2.3% of the
Companys total loan and lease portfolio, down from 2.9% at December 31, 2010.
Core loans, defined as total loans less leases, were $519.2 million at March 31, 2011, a $6.7
million, or 1.3% increase from $512.5 million at December 31, 2010. This equates to a 5.2%
annualized growth rate. The annualized growth rate in the fourth quarter of 2010 for the core loan
portfolio was 21.9%. The large amount of loans closed in the fourth quarter of 2010 left the loan
pipeline relatively lighter to start 2011.
Loans secured by real estate were $424.5 million at March 31, 2011, an increase of $6.4 million or
1.5% from December 31, 2010. The strongest growth was in commercial and multi-family real estate
loans, which increased $12.7 million or 4.9% in the first quarter of 2011. Some of that growth is
attributable to commercial construction loans converting to permanent loans in the first quarter.
Commercial construction loans decreased $6.9 million in the quarter to $25.4 million at March 31,
2011.
Residential mortgages decreased slightly from $70.0 million at December 31, 2010 to $69.8 million
at March 31, 2011. The sluggish national real estate market has kept long-term fixed rate mortgage
loan rates near all-time historic lows. As a result, the Company has sold the majority of its
originated residential mortgage loans. This, along with prepayments from existing customers
re-financing their homes, has resulted in the slight decrease in
32
residential mortgage balances in the first quarter of 2011. Residential mortgage originations have
increased sharply with $9.0 million in originations in the 2011 first quarter, compared with $4.1
million in last years first quarter, as the Company has added mortgage loan officers in the past
year.
The Bank sells certain fixed rate residential mortgages to FNMA, while maintaining the servicing
rights for those mortgages. During the three month period ended March 31, 2011, the Bank sold
mortgages to FNMA totaling $7.3 million, as compared with $2.0 million sold during the three month
period ended March 31, 2010. At March 31, 2011, the Bank had a loan servicing portfolio principal
balance of $49.8 million upon which it earns servicing fees, as compared with $44.2 million at
December 31, 2010. The value of the mortgage servicing rights for that portfolio was $0.4 million
at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Residential mortgage loans held-for-sale were $1.4
million at March 31, 2011, compared with $2.9 million at December 31, 2010. The Company has never
been contacted by FNMA to repurchase any loans due to improper documentation or fraud.
The Company continues to focus on C&I lending as a way to diversify its loan portfolio, which has
historically experienced strong growth rates in real estate loans. The C&I portfolio grew $0.7
million, or 0.8% in the first quarter of 2011. This equates to a 3.2% annualized growth rate. The
Company has recently bolstered its C&I potential with recent hirings and improvements to its cash
management capabilities. However, the Company faces the headwinds of a low growth economy and a
very competitive local market.
Leasing Portfolio
As noted above, management made the strategic decision in April 2009 to exit the national direct
financing lease business and market the portfolio for sale. This decision resulted in the
classification of the leasing portfolio as held-for-sale and the portfolio being marked to its
market value at June 30, 2009. The mark-to-market adjustment was $7.2 million. At September 30,
2009, management determined to keep the lease portfolio and service it to maturity, terminated its
plans to actively market the portfolio for sale, and the portfolio was placed back into
held-for-investment at the revised carrying amount as of June 30, 2009. The difference between the
principal value and the carrying value, initially created by the mark-to-market adjustment at June
30, 2009, reduces over time as individual leases deteriorate, become uncollectible, and are written
off. The allowance for lease losses was zero at June 30, 2009 when the portfolio was classified as
held-for-sale and reported at its fair market value. With the portfolio classified as
held-for-investment at March 31, 2011, the portfolio has been evaluated in accordance with the
Companys normal credit review policies in determining the appropriate allowance for lease losses.
During the first quarter of 2011, $0.6 million in leases were deemed uncollectible and the
difference between the principal value and carrying value of the leases declined from $1.5 million
to $0.9 million. The first quarter write-offs were flat when compared to the fourth quarter of
2010, but down from $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2010. Non-performing leases of $2.1
million at March 31, 2011 declined from $2.9 million at December 31, 2010 and $2.7 million at March
31, 2010. With both leasing write-offs and non-accruing lease balances declining, management
determined that there was no need to add to the allowance for leasing losses at March 31, 2011.
The following table illustrates the write-off and allowance activity related to the leasing
portfolio over the past five quarters.
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Leasing Principal Balance |
|
$ |
13,339 |
|
|
$ |
16,968 |
|
|
$ |
20,869 |
|
|
$ |
25,142 |
|
|
$ |
29,788 |
|
Mark |
|
|
(890 |
) |
|
|
(1,493 |
) |
|
|
(2,124 |
) |
|
|
(2,469 |
) |
|
|
(3,084 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing Carrying Value |
|
$ |
12,449 |
|
|
$ |
15,475 |
|
|
$ |
18,745 |
|
|
$ |
22,673 |
|
|
$ |
26,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-Market Adjustment |
|
$ |
1,493 |
|
|
$ |
2,124 |
|
|
$ |
2,469 |
|
|
$ |
3,084 |
|
|
$ |
4,159 |
|
Net Write-Offs |
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
(631 |
) |
|
|
(345 |
) |
|
|
(615 |
) |
|
|
(1,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Mark |
|
$ |
890 |
|
|
$ |
1,493 |
|
|
$ |
2,124 |
|
|
$ |
2,469 |
|
|
$ |
3,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Allowance for lease losses |
|
$ |
1,471 |
|
|
$ |
1,077 |
|
|
$ |
772 |
|
|
$ |
772 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Provision for leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
772 |
|
Leasing net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for lease losses |
|
$ |
1,471 |
|
|
$ |
1,471 |
|
|
$ |
1,077 |
|
|
$ |
772 |
|
|
$ |
772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mark plus allowance |
|
$ |
2,361 |
|
|
$ |
2,964 |
|
|
$ |
3,201 |
|
|
$ |
3,241 |
|
|
$ |
3,856 |
|
Mark + allowance/leasing
principal balance |
|
|
17.70 |
% |
|
|
17.47 |
% |
|
|
15.34 |
% |
|
|
12.89 |
% |
|
|
12.94 |
% |
Credit Quality of Loan Portfolio
Total non-performing loans and leases, defined as accruing loans and leases greater than 90 days
past due and non-accrual loans and leases, totaled $13.4 million, or 2.53% of total loans and
leases outstanding, at March 31, 2011, compared with $13.9 million, or 2.64% of total loans and
leases outstanding at December 31, 2010. In the first quarter of 2011, two commercial real estate
loans with a balance of $0.9 million, one commercial construction loan with a balance of $0.6
million, and two home equity loans with a balance of $0.2 million were moved into non-accrual. The
total impairment on those loans was $0.1 million and was included in the provision for loan and
lease losses in the three month period ended March 31, 2011.
The $1.7 million in loans moved into non-performing loans and leases was offset by a decrease in
non-accruing leases of $0.8 million in the first quarter, the payoff of a $0.8 million loan that
was 90 days past due and still accruing at December 31, 2010, and the partial charge-off of three
non-performing loan relationships for $0.4 million. The decrease in leasing nonaccruals resulted
mostly from charge-offs of leases in nonaccrual at December 31, 2010 and fewer leases being placed
on nonaccrual in the first quarter of 2011. There was also a $0.1 million pay-down on the
Companys largest non-accruing lease.
The allowance for loan and lease losses totaled $10.5 million or 1.97% of total loans and leases
outstanding at March 31, 2011, as compared with $10.4 million or 1.97% of total loans and leases
outstanding at December 31, 2010. The increase in the allowance over the prior year resulted from
a $0.5 million provision for loan and lease losses offset by net charge-offs of $0.4 million in the
three month period ended March 31, 2011. The provision resulted from an upward trend in loans
categorized as special mention (risk rating of 5) or substandard (risk rating of 6) in the
Companys internal credit ratings, loan growth, and an increase in specific reserves for impaired
loans. The $0.4 million in net charge-offs equates to a 0.33% annualized ratio as a percentage of
net loans and leases. This compares with a 0.06% ratio in the fourth quarter of 2010 and 0.01% in
the first quarter of 2010. The charge-offs in the first quarter of 2011 stemmed from partial
charge-offs of three C&I loan relationships that were already identified as impaired and on
nonaccrual and adequately reserved as of December 31, 2010.
The coverage ratio of the allowance for loan and lease losses to non-performing loans and leases
increased from 72% to 78% at March 31, 2010 and 2011, respectively. There are two factors that
significantly influence these ratios. The first factor is the covered loan portfolio acquired in
the Waterford transaction discussed in Note 4 to the
34
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The second factor is the leasing portfolio, which
carries significantly higher risk, but also has the remaining mark to consider as depicted in the
table above. The following table depicts the allowance and non-performing ratios by segregating
the covered and non-covered loan portfolios and the leasing portfolio as of the following dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for loan and |
|
|
performing |
|
|
loan and lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
lease |
|
|
loans and |
|
|
losses/Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
performing |
|
|
losses/Total |
|
|
leases/Total |
|
|
performing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for loan and |
|
|
loans and |
|
|
loans and |
|
|
loans and |
|
|
loans and |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
lease losses |
|
|
leases |
|
|
leases |
|
|
leases |
|
|
leases |
|
Non-covered loans |
|
$ |
487,348 |
|
|
$ |
8,888 |
|
|
$ |
8,990 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
1.84 |
% |
|
|
98.87 |
% |
Covered loans |
|
|
31,832 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
2,332 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
% |
|
|
7.33 |
% |
|
|
5.27 |
% |
Leases |
|
|
12,449 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
2,127 |
|
|
|
11.82 |
% |
|
|
17.09 |
% |
|
|
69.16 |
% |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
531,629 |
|
|
$ |
10,482 |
|
|
$ |
13,449 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
% |
|
|
2.53 |
% |
|
|
77.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for loan and |
|
|
performing |
|
|
loan and lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
lease |
|
|
loans and |
|
|
losses/Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
performing |
|
|
losses/Total |
|
|
leases/Total |
|
|
performing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for loan and |
|
|
loans and |
|
|
loans and |
|
|
loans and |
|
|
loans and |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
lease losses |
|
|
leases |
|
|
leases |
|
|
leases |
|
|
leases |
|
Non-covered loans |
|
$ |
478,346 |
|
|
$ |
8,834 |
|
|
$ |
8,515 |
|
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
1.78 |
% |
|
|
103.75 |
% |
Covered loans |
|
|
34,157 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
|
7.27 |
% |
|
|
4.80 |
% |
Leases |
|
|
15,475 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
2,930 |
|
|
|
9.51 |
% |
|
|
18.93 |
% |
|
|
50.20 |
% |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
527,978 |
|
|
$ |
10,424 |
|
|
$ |
13,927 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
% |
|
|
2.64 |
% |
|
|
74.85 |
% |
|
|
|
Investing Activities
Total securities were $100.9 million at March 31, 2011, reflecting a $7.6 million, or 8.1%,
increase from $93.3 million at December 31, 2010. The increase in securities balances is a result
of deposit growth out-pacing loan growth in the first quarter of 2011. Management utilized some of
the excess funds raised to purchase investment securities. Compared with December 31, 2010, as of
March 31, 2011, the Company added $1.0 million in U.S. government-sponsored agency bonds, $2.1
million in tax-advantaged municipal bonds, and $5.0 million in U.S. government-sponsored
mortgage-backed securities. Interest-bearing deposits at other banks, which consist of overnight
funds kept at correspondent banks, increased from $0.3 million at December 31, 2010 to $17.6
million at March 31, 2011. $21.6 million of the deposit growth in the first quarter is
attributable to increases in municipal deposits. As most of that municipal deposit growth is
likely seasonal due to inflows from tax receipts, management decided to keep the funds invested
short-term. Securities and interest-bearing deposits at correspondent banks made up 16.8% of the
Banks total average interest earning assets in the first quarter of 2011, compared with 17.1% in
the fourth quarter of 2010.
The Companys highest concentration in its securities portfolio continues to be in its
tax-advantaged municipal bonds, which comprised 41.6% of the total portfolio at March 31, 2011,
compared with 42.9% at December 31, 2010. The concentration in government-sponsored
mortgage-backed securities increased from 30.7% at December 31, 2010 to 33.3% at March 31, 2011.
U.S. government-sponsored agency bonds of various types comprised 25.1% of the portfolio at March
31, 2011 versus 26.4% at December 31, 2010. As a member of both the Federal Reserve System and
FHLBNY, the Bank is required to hold stock in those entities. The credit quality of the securities
portfolio as a whole is believed to be strong as the portfolio is in an overall unrealized net gain
position, with no individual securities in a significant unrealized loss position. With interest
rates at historic lows, the net unrealized
35
gain position of the investment portfolio increased from
$1.3 million at December 31, 2010 to $1.5 million at March 31, 2011.
The Company monitors extension and prepayment risk in the securities portfolio to limit potential
exposures. The average expected life of the securities portfolio was 3.9 years as of March 31,
2011 compared with 4.0 years as of December 31, 2010. Available-for-sale securities with a total
fair value of $91.4 million and $65.6 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively, were pledged as collateral to secure public deposits and for other purposes required
or permitted by law. The Company has no direct exposure to subprime mortgages, nor does the
Company hold private mortgage-backed securities, credit default swaps, or FNMA or FHLMC preferred
stock investments in its investment portfolio.
Funding Activities
Total deposits at March 31, 2011 were $585.1 million, reflecting a $40.7 million, or 7.5%, increase
from December 31, 2010. $21.6 million of the growth occurred in municipal deposits. There is
typically a seasonal spike in municipal deposits in the first quarter of the year due to tax
receipt inflows at the municipalities. The municipal deposit growth was across various deposit
categories: demand ($0.4 million), NOW ($7.3 million), regular savings ($1.1 million), and
muni-vest savings ($12.8 million). Demand deposits at March 31, 2011 were $99.4 million,
reflecting a $1.4 million or 1.4% increase from December 31, 2010. Demand deposit balances
fluctuate day-to-day based on the high volume of transactions normally associated with the demand
product, and therefore average demand deposit growth is a better measure of sustained growth.
Average demand deposits during the three month period ended March 31, 2011 of $101.8 million were
4.0% higher than the fourth quarter of 2010 and 21.2% higher than the prior years first quarter.
Most of the Companys growth in demand deposits has come from commercial customers.
The Companys retail deposit growth vehicle continues to be the complementary Better Checking and
Better Savings products, which are included in the NOW and regular savings deposit categories on
the Companys balance sheet, respectively. The Better Checking product, introduced in the fourth
quarter of 2009, is unique in the Banks Western New York footprint as it pays a premium interest
rate as a reward to customers who demonstrate a deep relationship with the Bank as evidenced by
regular use of their debit card, use of direct deposit, and electronic statements. Overall, Better
Checking deposits increased $3.4 million for the first three months of the year. Regular savings
deposits increased $14.4 million, or 5.8%, in the first quarter of 2011. That growth is mostly a
result of an increase in Better Savings deposits, offset by decreases in legacy savings products.
Time deposits were $143.6 million at March 31, 2011, an increase of $1.3 million, or 0.9%, from
$142.3 million at December 31, 2010. While some long-term rates have risen recently, time deposit
rates remain near historic lows. As a result, customers have continued to show a preference for
liquid savings products over time deposits.
Short-term borrowings, which typically include the Banks overnight line of credit and other
advances with the FHLBNY and other short-term notes, decreased to near zero ($39 thousand) at March
31, 2011 from $13.7 million at December 31, 2010. Because the Companys deposit growth has
outpaced its loan growth this year, the Banks outstanding overnight line of credit with FHLBNY,
was reduced to zero at March 31, 2011. Long-term borrowings at March 31, 2011 remained unchanged
from the December 31, 2010 balance.
36
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Average Balance Sheet
The following tables present the significant categories of the assets and liabilities of the
Company, interest income and interest expense, and the corresponding yields earned and rates paid
for the periods indicated. The assets and liabilities are presented as daily averages. The
average loan and lease balances include both performing and non-performing loans and leases.
Investments are included at amortized cost. Yields are presented on a non-tax-equivalent basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Earned/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Earned/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases, net |
|
$ |
518,246 |
|
|
$ |
7,152 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
% |
|
$ |
484,241 |
|
|
$ |
6,941 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
% |
Taxable securities |
|
|
57,442 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
% |
|
|
41,809 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
3.86 |
% |
Tax-exempt securities |
|
|
38,536 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
39,564 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
4.06 |
% |
Interest bearing deposits at banks |
|
|
8,456 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
622,680 |
|
|
$ |
8,013 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
% |
|
|
567,947 |
|
|
$ |
7,746 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
15,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
10,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
684,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
623,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW |
|
$ |
38,469 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
$ |
19,638 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
0.75 |
% |
Regular savings |
|
|
256,158 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
231,761 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
% |
Muni-Vest savings |
|
|
24,616 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
|
30,913 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
143,177 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
2.44 |
% |
|
|
140,381 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
2.48 |
% |
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
27,129 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
40,373 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
% |
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
11,330 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
11,330 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
% |
Securities sold U/A to repurchase |
|
|
6,387 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
7,190 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
507,266 |
|
|
$ |
1,716 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
|
481,586 |
|
|
$ |
1,668 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
101,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
11,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
620,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
576,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
64,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity |
|
$ |
684,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
623,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.07 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Net Income
The Company had net income of $1.9 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, in the first quarter of
2011, an increase from net income of $1.4 million, or $0.51 per diluted share, in the first quarter
of 2010. The change in net income reflects a provision for loan and lease losses of $0.5 million
in the first quarter of 2011, which was $0.7 million lower than the first quarter of 2010. The
2010 first quarter included a $0.8 million provision for the Companys leasing portfolio, compared
with zero provision for the leasing portfolio in this years first quarter. The return on average
equity was 11.71% for the first quarter of 2011, compared with 12.29% in the first quarter of 2010.
The decline in diluted earnings per share and return on average equity reflects the impact of the
Companys common stock offering in May 2010 that resulted in the issuance of 1.2 million shares of
common stock which generated $13.4 million in net proceeds to the Company.
Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations
To provide investors with greater understanding of the Companys operating results, in addition to
the results measured in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the
Company provides supplemental reporting on net operating income, which excludes items that
management believes to be non-operating in nature. Specifically, net operating income excludes
gains and losses on the sale and call of securities, non-cash impairment and amortization of
acquisition-related goodwill and intangible assets. This non-GAAP information is being disclosed
because management believes that providing these non-GAAP financial measures provides investors
with information useful in understanding the Companys financial performance, its performance
trends, and financial position. While the Companys management uses these non-GAAP measures in its
analysis of the Companys performance, this information should not be viewed as a substitute for
financial results determined in accordance with GAAP or considered to be more important than
financial results determined in accordance with GAAP, nor is it necessarily comparable with
non-GAAP measures which may be presented by other companies. The reconciliation of net operating
income and diluted net operating earnings per share to GAAP net income and GAAP diluted earnings
per share is presented in the following table.
Reconciliation of GAAP Net Income to Net Operating Income (non-GAAP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
GAAP Net Income |
|
$ |
1,875 |
|
|
$ |
1,447 |
|
Loss on sale and call of securities 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Amortization of intangibles 1 |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income 2 |
|
$ |
1,954 |
|
|
$ |
1,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
Loss on sale and call of securities 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles 1 |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net operating earnings per share 2 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Tax effected |
|
2 |
|
Non-GAAP measure |
Other Results of Operations
Net interest income was $6.3 million during the first quarter of 2011, up 3.6% compared with the
first quarter of 2010 and 3.5% from the fourth quarter of 2010. Growth in net interest-earning
assets drove the increase from fourth quarter 2010 and also offset the net interest margin
contraction from first quarter 2010. Core loans, which are defined as total loans and leases less
direct financing leases, were $519.2 million at March 31, 2011, an increase of 9.8% from $472.9
million at March 31, 2010, and up 1.3% (5.2% annualized) from $512.5 million at December 31, 2010.
The annualized growth rate in the fourth quarter of 2010 for the core loan portfolio was 21.9%.
The large
38
amount of loans closed in the fourth quarter of 2010 left the loan pipeline relatively
lighter to start 2011. The commercial real estate portfolio experienced the strongest growth of the
different portfolio segments with growth of $5.8 million or 2.0% (8.0% annualized) in the first
quarter of 2011.
Net interest margin remained relatively strong at 4.05% for the first quarter of 2011, compared
with 4.00% in the 2010 fourth quarter and 4.28% in the 2010 first quarter. The 5 basis point
increase in net interest margin in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the fourth quarter of 2010
was a result of larger than normal prepayment fees of $0.2 million, which are recorded in interest
income and were a result of large commercial loan payoffs and re-financings. Adjusting for the
increase in prepayments the net interest margin would have compressed by 6 basis points to 3.94%
for the first quarter 2011 compared with fourth quarter 2010. Although the net interest margin
compression is slowing in relation to the last several quarters compression rate, it is consistent
with the quarter over quarter net interest margin trend. When comparing first quarter 2011 net
interest margin to first quarter 2010, the largest factor in the compression of the net interest
margin is the declining interest rate environment. As the low interest rate cycle matures, the
Companys loan and investment portfolios continue to re-price into lower yields as evidenced by a
decline in yield on interest-earning assets of 30 basis points from the first quarter of 2010. The
Company benefited from re-pricing its interest-bearing liabilities much earlier in the interest
rate cycle and these rates have fallen less than its interest-earning assets in 2011. The cost of
interest-bearing liabilities for the Company declined only 4 basis points in the first-quarter 2011
from the first-quarter 2010.
The provision for loan and lease losses decreased to $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2011,
from $1.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2010 and $1.2 million in the first quarter of 2010. The
primary reason for the decrease was that there was no leasing provision in the first quarter of
2011. The fourth quarter of 2010 had $0.4 million of provision related to the leasing portfolio,
while the first quarter of 2010 had $0.8 million in leasing provision. The provision for loan
losses was $1.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2010 and $0.4 million in the first quarter of
2010. The fourth quarter of 2010 had the relatively higher loan provision due to the increase in
non-performing loans.
Non-interest income, which represented 35.5% of total revenue in the first quarter of 2011,
declined 6.5%, or $0.2 million, to $3.5 million when compared with the first quarter of 2010. The
decrease was attributable to a reduction in service charges and insurance agency revenue. Service
charges on deposits decreased $125 thousand, or 24.5%, compared with the first quarter 2010,
primarily due to new Regulation E rules pertaining to overdraft fees. Insurance agency revenue of
$2.1 million was down $157 thousand, or 7.0%, when compared with the 2010 first quarter as the soft
insurance market and macro-economic conditions continue to put downward pressure on personal and
commercial property and casualty insurance commissions.
Total non-interest expense was $6.6 million in the first quarter of 2011, an increase of $0.1
million, or 2.4%, from $6.5 million in the first quarter of 2010. The largest component of the
increase was salaries and employee benefits, which increased $0.3 million, or 8.2%, to $3.9 million
in the first quarter of 2011 compared with the prior-year first quarter. This rise reflected merit
increases awarded for 2010 performance and increased staff, including commercial loan officers and
other business-generating positions. This was partially off-set by a decline in other expenses,
primarily related to a reduced amortization expense with respect to intangible assets acquired in
the purchase of Suchak Data Systems, Inc., which were fully amortized at the end of 2010.
As a result of the increase in non-interest expense and the decrease in non-interest income, the
efficiency ratio, excluding goodwill impairment and intangible amortization, increased to 66.36%
for the first quarter of 2011, from 63.56% in the first quarter of 2010.
Income tax expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 was $0.8 million, an effective tax rate of
29.6%, compared with an effective tax rate of 31.6% in the first quarter of 2010. The higher
effective tax rate for the first quarter 2010 reflected tax adjustments related to the wind down of the leasing portfolio requiring
an increase in the state income tax valuation allowance.
CAPITAL
The Company consistently maintains regulatory capital ratios measurably above the federal well
capitalized standard, including a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 9.89% at March 31, 2011 and 9.93% at
December 31, 2010. Book value per share of the Companys common stock was $15.71 at March 31,
2011, compared with $15.45 at December 31, 2010. Tangible book value per share at March 31, 2011
was $13.48, compared with $13.18 at December 31,
39
2010. The increase in both book value and
tangible book value per share is a result of the increase in the Companys earnings over the
quarter ended December 31, 2010, somewhat offset by the dividend declared in the first quarter of
2011.
On February 15, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a semi-annual cash dividend of
$0.20 per share on the Companys outstanding common stock. The dividend was paid on April 4, 2011
to shareholders of record as of March 10, 2011. The $0.20 dividend was equal to the previous
dividend paid on October 6, 2010.
LIQUIDITY
The Bank utilizes cash flows from the investment portfolio and federal funds sold balances to
manage the liquidity requirements related to loan demand and deposit fluctuations. The Bank also
has many borrowing options. As a member of the FHLB the Bank is able to borrow funds at competitive
rates. Advances of up to $100.2 million can be drawn on the FHLB via an Overnight Line of Credit
Agreement between the Bank and the FHLB. An amount equal to 25% of the Banks total assets could
be borrowed through the advance programs under certain qualifying circumstances. The Bank also has
the ability to purchase up to $14.0 million in federal funds from its correspondent banks. By
placing sufficient collateral in safekeeping at the Federal Reserve Bank, the Bank could borrow at
the discount window. The Banks liquidity needs also can be met by more aggressively pursuing time
deposits, or accessing the brokered time deposit market, including the Certificate of Deposit
Account Registry Service (CDARS) network. The Companys primary source of liquidity is dividends
from the Bank. Additionally, the Company has access to capital markets as a funding source, as
evidenced by its recent registered public offering of common stock, described in greater detail in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Cash flows from the Banks investment portfolio are laddered, so that securities mature at regular
intervals, to provide funds from principal and interest payments at various times as liquidity
needs may arise. Contractual maturities are also laddered, with consideration as to the volatility
of market prices. At March 31, 2011, approximately 3.8% of the Banks securities had contractual
maturity dates of one year or less and approximately 24.0% had maturity dates of five years or
less.
Management, on an ongoing basis, closely monitors the Companys liquidity position for compliance
with internal policies, and believes that available sources of liquidity are adequate to meet
funding needs in the normal course of business. As part of that monitoring process, management
calculates the 90-day liquidity each month by analyzing the cash needs of the Bank. Included in
the calculation are liquid assets and potential liabilities. Management stresses the potential
liabilities calculation to ensure a strong liquidity position. Included in the calculation are
assumptions of some significant deposit run-off as well as funds needed for loan closings and
investment purchases. At March 31, 2011, in the Companys internal stress test, the Company had net
short-term liquidity of $77.9 million as compared with $70.2 million at December 31, 2010.
Management does not anticipate engaging in any activities, either currently or in the long term,
for which adequate funding would not be available and which would therefore result in significant
pressure on liquidity. However, continued economic recession could negatively impact the Companys
liquidity.
The Company believes that the Bank maintains a sufficient level of U.S. government and government
agency securities and New York State municipal bonds that can be pledged as collateral for
municipal deposits.
40
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Additional information responsive to this Item is contained in the Liquidity section of
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which
information is incorporated herein by reference.
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and/or interest rates of the
Banks financial instruments. The primary market risk the Company is exposed to is interest rate
risk. The core banking activities of lending and deposit-taking expose the Bank to interest rate
risk, which occurs when assets and liabilities reprice at different times and by different amounts
as interest rates change. As a result, net interest income earned by the Bank is subject to the
effects of changing interest rates. The Bank measures interest rate risk by calculating the
variability of net interest income in future periods under various interest rate scenarios using
projected balances for interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Managements
philosophy toward interest rate risk management is to limit the variability of net interest income
to changes in net interest rates. The balances of financial instruments used in the projections are
based on expected growth from forecasted business opportunities, anticipated prepayments of loans,
and expected maturities of investment securities, loans and deposits. Management supplements the
modeling technique described above with analysis of market values of the Banks financial
instruments and changes to such market values given changes in the interest rates.
The Banks Asset-Liability Committee, which includes members of senior management, monitors the
Banks interest rate sensitivity with the aid of a model that considers the impact of ongoing
lending and deposit taking activities, as well as interrelationships in the magnitude and timing of
the repricing of financial instruments, including the effect of changing interest rates on expected
prepayments and maturities. When deemed prudent, management has taken actions, and intends to do so
in the future, to mitigate exposure to interest rate risk through the use of on- or off-balance
sheet financial instruments. Possible actions include, but are not limited to, changing the pricing
of loan and deposit products, and modifying the composition of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, and other financial instruments used for interest rate risk
management purposes.
The following table demonstrates the possible impact of changes in interest rates on the Banks net
interest income over a 12-month period of time:
SENSITIVITY OF NET INTEREST INCOME TO CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated (decrease) increase |
|
|
in projected annual net interest income |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
Changes in interest rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+200 basis points |
|
$759 |
|
$486 |
+100 basis points |
|
867 |
|
945 |
|
|
|
|
|
-100 basis points |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
-200 basis points |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
Many assumptions were utilized by management to calculate the impact that changes in interest rates
may have on the Banks net interest income. The more significant assumptions related to the rate of
prepayments of mortgage-related assets, loan and deposit volumes and pricing, and deposit maturities. The Bank assumed immediate changes in rates including 200 basis point rate changes. In
the event that the 200 basis point rate changes cannot be achieved, the applicable rate changes are
limited to lesser amounts such that interest rates cannot be less than zero. These assumptions are
inherently uncertain and, as a result, the Bank cannot precisely predict the impact of changes in
interest rates on net interest income. Actual results may differ significantly due to the timing,
magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes in market conditions and interest rate differentials (spreads) between maturity/repricing categories, as well as any actions such as those
previously described, which management may take to counter such changes. In light of the uncertainties and assumptions associated with the
process, the amounts
41
presented in the table and changes in such amounts are not considered
significant to the Banks projected net interest income.
ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2011 (the end of the period covered by this Report). Based on that
evaluation, the Companys principal executive and principal financial officers concluded that as of
March 31, 2011 the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
No changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting were identified in connection
with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 under the Exchange Act
that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6 EXHIBITS
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the Exhibit Index
included immediately following the signature page to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evans Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
DATE May 6, 2011 |
/s/ David J. Nasca
|
|
|
David J. Nasca |
|
|
President and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
DATE May 6, 2011 |
/s/ Gary A. Kajtoch
|
|
|
Gary A. Kajtoch |
|
|
Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
43
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Name |
|
Page No. |
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
45 |
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
46 |
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18
USC Section 1350 Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
|
47 |
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18
USC Section 1350 Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
48 |
44